{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DataViva/dataviva-site/issues/262","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DataViva/dataviva-site/issues/262/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DataViva/dataviva-site/issues/262/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DataViva/dataviva-site/issues/262/events","html_url":"https://github.com/DataViva/dataviva-site/issues/262","id":61186321,"number":262,"title":"Value <XX on stacked","user":{"login":"dgomes2004","id":6068338,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6068338?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dgomes2004","html_url":"https://github.com/dgomes2004","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dgomes2004/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dgomes2004/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dgomes2004/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dgomes2004/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dgomes2004/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dgomes2004/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dgomes2004/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dgomes2004/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dgomes2004/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-03-13T18:59:18Z","updated_at":"2015-03-13T18:59:18Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Guys, this kind of grouping is still showing on stacked. Just as on treemap, since the idea is to show the top values, we think this is not a good thing to do. Can we go back to the 1.0 way (not group anything and leave the little guys there, even if we cannot really see them)?\r\n\r\n![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/6068338/6645144/ca3902f2-c998-11e4-9b35-812d4d842793.png)\r\n\r\nhttp://dv2.datawheel.us/apps/builder/stacked/rais/4mg/all/all/cnae/?sort=asc&layout=value&controls=true&year=2002_2013&y=num_emp&order=color"}}