{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/26","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/26/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/26/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/26/events","html_url":"https://github.com/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/26","id":85658136,"number":26,"title":"Changing an Objection Validity Criteria","user":{"login":"brianjrobertson","id":12117751,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12117751?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson","html_url":"https://github.com/brianjrobertson","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-06-05T23:48:01Z","updated_at":"2015-06-06T22:50:15Z","closed_at":"2015-06-06T22:50:15Z","body":"I'm considering tweaking an objection validity criteria, and I'm trying to assess: (a) should I save this to consider for v5.0 instead of v4.1, and (b) does this change add greater clarity and distinction-making capacity, without breaking anything in the process?\r\n\r\nThe candidate change is from this objection validity criteria:\r\n(c) The Tension is triggered by presently known data or events, without regard to predicted data or events. However, relying on predicted data or events is allowed when no opportunity is likely to exist in the future to adequately sense and respond to the predicted situation before significant impact could result.\r\n\r\nTo this language instead:\r\n(c) The Tension is triggered immediately just by facts known at present or recent history, without regard to a prediction of what might happen in the future. However, relying on predictions is allowed when there won't be a reasonable opportunity to sense and respond in the future before significant impact results.\r\n\r\nThoughts or feedback anyone?"}}