{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/P-H-C/phc-winner-argon2/issues/22","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/P-H-C/phc-winner-argon2/issues/22/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/P-H-C/phc-winner-argon2/issues/22/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/P-H-C/phc-winner-argon2/issues/22/events","html_url":"https://github.com/P-H-C/phc-winner-argon2/issues/22","id":115299506,"number":22,"title":"autotools build framework","user":{"login":"0-wiz-0","id":2221844,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2221844?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/0-wiz-0","html_url":"https://github.com/0-wiz-0","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/0-wiz-0/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/0-wiz-0/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/0-wiz-0/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/0-wiz-0/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/0-wiz-0/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/0-wiz-0/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/0-wiz-0/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/0-wiz-0/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/0-wiz-0/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":9,"created_at":"2015-11-05T14:49:55Z","updated_at":"2015-11-07T23:21:33Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Please take a look at my fork, which contains a basic autotools framework for argon2.\r\nkats/test.sh needs to be converted to work with this.\r\nAnd it's currently a configure flag (--enable-optimization) to decide if opt.c or ref.c is used."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/P-H-C/phc-winner-argon2/issues/comments/154764710","html_url":"https://github.com/P-H-C/phc-winner-argon2/issues/22#issuecomment-154764710","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/P-H-C/phc-winner-argon2/issues/22","id":154764710,"user":{"login":"technion","id":1948596,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1948596?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/technion","html_url":"https://github.com/technion","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/technion/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/technion/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/technion/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/technion/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/technion/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/technion/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/technion/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/technion/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/technion/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-11-07T23:21:33Z","updated_at":"2015-11-07T23:21:33Z","body":"@sneves : Yes, that's my point. C99 features could easily (arguably, likely) slip in if autoconf decides it's not a required flag on developer's machines and removes it from the build going forward.\r\n\r\nIn line with the \"lowest common denominator\" comment, lets say I want to test on an old, uncommon, or otherwise autoconf-less platform - is the expectation that I would wait for someone to tag 1.0 release before identifying it as incompatible?\r\n"}}