{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/87","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/87/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/87/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/87/events","html_url":"https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/87","id":100615856,"number":87,"title":"License issue","user":{"login":"crypto","id":139306,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/139306?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/crypto","html_url":"https://github.com/crypto","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crypto/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crypto/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crypto/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crypto/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crypto/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crypto/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crypto/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crypto/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crypto/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-08-12T19:23:40Z","updated_at":"2015-08-14T15:31:58Z","closed_at":null,"body":"We want to use lib at LinkedIn, but legal department have concern about MPL 2.0 License that is slightly copyleft, please consider to use one of other open licenses e.g.:\r\n* Apache 2.0 License\r\n* BSD \"2-clause\" or \"Simplified\" License\r\n* BSD \"3-clause\" License\r\n* MIT License\r\n\r\nThanks."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/comments/131150771","html_url":"https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/87#issuecomment-131150771","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/87","id":131150771,"user":{"login":"quanah","id":1817107,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1817107?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/quanah","html_url":"https://github.com/quanah","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/quanah/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/quanah/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/quanah/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/quanah/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/quanah/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/quanah/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/quanah/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/quanah/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/quanah/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-14T15:31:58Z","updated_at":"2015-08-14T15:31:58Z","body":"For our company (Zimbra), Apache 1.1, 2.0 are considered free and clear for use.  MPL of any sort requires review by our legal team to see how the code will be used.  I think the larger difference is that the Apache License (2.0) does not require end user modifications to be shared back to a project, while MPL does in some circumstances.\r\n\r\nhttp://choosealicense.com/licenses/ has a basic bullet point of differences between the two as well."}}