{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOM-Research/metaScience/issues/19","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOM-Research/metaScience/issues/19/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOM-Research/metaScience/issues/19/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOM-Research/metaScience/issues/19/events","html_url":"https://github.com/SOM-Research/metaScience/issues/19","id":90219780,"number":19,"title":"Collaboration evolution","user":{"login":"jcabot","id":1058925,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1058925?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcabot","html_url":"https://github.com/jcabot","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcabot/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcabot/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcabot/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcabot/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcabot/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcabot/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcabot/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcabot/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcabot/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOM-Research/metaScience/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":{"login":"rBoncorps","id":1138289,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1138289?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rBoncorps","html_url":"https://github.com/rBoncorps","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rBoncorps/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rBoncorps/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rBoncorps/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rBoncorps/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rBoncorps/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rBoncorps/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rBoncorps/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rBoncorps/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rBoncorps/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"milestone":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOM-Research/metaScience/milestones/1","html_url":"https://github.com/SOM-Research/metaScience/milestones/v0.2.0","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOM-Research/metaScience/milestones/1/labels","id":1156618,"number":1,"title":"v0.2.0","description":"Main feature: Support for authors","creator":{"login":"jlcanovas","id":1996760,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1996760?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas","html_url":"https://github.com/jlcanovas","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"open_issues":2,"closed_issues":11,"state":"open","created_at":"2015-06-09T10:56:34Z","updated_at":"2015-06-23T13:18:07Z","due_on":null,"closed_at":null},"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-06-22T21:39:52Z","updated_at":"2015-06-25T08:09:26Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I've been thinking about the role I´d like the second panel (the one now called \"written pages evolution\") to be.\r\n\r\nI think that while the first one focuses on overall results achieved by the author (in terms of number of publications), the second one could focus on  how the authors has been collaborating to achieve those results.\r\n\r\nTherefore, I propose to do the following changes:\r\n\r\n- \"Activity panel\": as it is now or, potentially, adding a line chart on top of the current bar chart with the total page published for the year (not taking into account the number of authors per paper, just total number of pages adding all publications in the year for that author) \r\n\r\n- Collaboration panel, showing for every year:\r\n\r\nAverage number of co-authors for the papers published that year\r\nNumber of papers for the year when taking into account the number of authors per paper. This would be similar to the idea of average number of pages but I think it's easier to understand. The idea is that I´ve published in one year 3 papers, with 3 authors each (including myself) in the first panel I´d show 3 as a result but on the collaboration panel I´d show 1 (1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3)\r\n\r\nBoth collaboration metrics are important. \r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOM-Research/metaScience/issues/comments/115157333","html_url":"https://github.com/SOM-Research/metaScience/issues/19#issuecomment-115157333","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOM-Research/metaScience/issues/19","id":115157333,"user":{"login":"jlcanovas","id":1996760,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1996760?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas","html_url":"https://github.com/jlcanovas","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlcanovas/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-06-25T08:09:26Z","updated_at":"2015-06-25T08:09:26Z","body":"The metric \"average number of co-authors per year\" is also clear to me. The second (i.e., \"number of papers for the year...\") is more difficult to see because the numeric result may not give a clue about how the collaboration was during the year. \r\n\r\nWhat about weighing the result according to some factor (e.g., number of papers considering that all of them were co-authored with the max number of co-authors)? Well, this may sound even more complicated...\r\n\r\nOther option could be to indicate the min and max values (e.g., papers with the least and most co-authored values).\r\n\r\n"}}