{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tacitknowledge/aem-cookbook/issues/18","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tacitknowledge/aem-cookbook/issues/18/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tacitknowledge/aem-cookbook/issues/18/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tacitknowledge/aem-cookbook/issues/18/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tacitknowledge/aem-cookbook/issues/18","id":58249349,"number":18,"title":"Flatten attributes in attributes/default.rb","user":{"login":"bignastybryce","id":2035965,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2035965?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bignastybryce","html_url":"https://github.com/bignastybryce","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bignastybryce/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bignastybryce/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bignastybryce/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bignastybryce/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bignastybryce/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bignastybryce/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bignastybryce/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bignastybryce/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bignastybryce/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-02-19T18:35:59Z","updated_at":"2015-02-19T18:35:59Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Assigning attributes as hashes can cause some odd behavior during the merge.  The attributes should be flattened to single values per assignment where possible.  I know this takes a lot more typing, and I also know that I was the one who did it like this in the first place.  I can only plead youth(!?) and ignorance.  Might as well change the keys to strings instead of symbols while you're at it, to make foodcritic happy."}}