{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/103","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/103/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/103/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/103/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/103","id":52689874,"number":103,"title":"Additional clarity about which messages are in session_hash","user":{"login":"ekr","id":1111457,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1111457?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ekr","html_url":"https://github.com/ekr","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ekr/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ekr/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ekr/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ekr/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ekr/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ekr/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ekr/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ekr/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ekr/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2014-12-22T21:20:34Z","updated_at":"2015-01-05T11:35:38Z","closed_at":null,"body":"WRT Pull Request #89, Martin Thomson writes.\r\n\r\n\"As I commented in the meeting, I think that we need to be somewhat more prescriptive about what is \r\ncovered by the session_hash at each point. That is, enumerate precisely what messages form handshake_messages (and probably also what parts of those messages). This is useful since session_hash is used in two ways. It will be more relevant when we talk about 0 RTT handshakes, where the order of messages that appear in the handshake could change significantly.\"\r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/comments/68697216","html_url":"https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/103#issuecomment-68697216","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/103","id":68697216,"user":{"login":"grubba","id":1169458,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1169458?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/grubba","html_url":"https://github.com/grubba","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grubba/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grubba/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grubba/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grubba/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grubba/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grubba/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grubba/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grubba/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grubba/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-05T11:35:38Z","updated_at":"2015-01-05T11:35:38Z","body":"One possible way to add clarity with a minimum of ambiguity, would to add indications of where the master keys are generated to figures 1 through 3 in section 7.2, but the figures aren't normative, are they?"}}