{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kmike/DAWG-Python/issues/1","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kmike/DAWG-Python/issues/1/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kmike/DAWG-Python/issues/1/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kmike/DAWG-Python/issues/1/events","html_url":"https://github.com/kmike/DAWG-Python/pull/1","id":68218506,"number":1,"title":"Adding edges() and iteredges() Functions for DAWGs","user":{"login":"EliFinkelshteyn","id":991121,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/991121?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn","html_url":"https://github.com/EliFinkelshteyn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EliFinkelshteyn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":15,"created_at":"2015-04-13T23:32:24Z","updated_at":"2015-04-20T08:57:24Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kmike/DAWG-Python/pulls/1","html_url":"https://github.com/kmike/DAWG-Python/pull/1","diff_url":"https://github.com/kmike/DAWG-Python/pull/1.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/kmike/DAWG-Python/pull/1.patch"},"body":"As discussed at https://github.com/kmike/marisa-trie/issues/20, this is support for adding the edges() and iteredges() methods for CompletionDAWG. If this looks good, I'll add similar support for RecordDAWGs and ByteDAWGs. The code isn't as optimized as it could be, but it works, it's clean (IMO), and it's fast enough for me."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kmike/DAWG-Python/issues/comments/94397746","html_url":"https://github.com/kmike/DAWG-Python/pull/1#issuecomment-94397746","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kmike/DAWG-Python/issues/1","id":94397746,"user":{"login":"coveralls","id":2354108,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2354108?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls","html_url":"https://github.com/coveralls","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/coveralls/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-20T08:57:24Z","updated_at":"2015-04-20T08:57:24Z","body":"\n[![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/2376072/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/2376072)\n\nCoverage decreased (-3.93%) to 89.91% when pulling **ae7472ab7c5d9e7f6257e5f97da705b0d3a8cdb2 on EliFinkelshteyn:master** into **3a5692264c98f5d085c707ad90d2fea64a53d07c on kmike:master**.\n"}}