{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nipy/nibabel/issues/388","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nipy/nibabel/issues/388/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nipy/nibabel/issues/388/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nipy/nibabel/issues/388/events","html_url":"https://github.com/nipy/nibabel/pull/388","id":118524740,"number":388,"title":"WIP: Support calling Sphinx with Python 3","user":{"login":"effigies","id":83442,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/83442?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/effigies","html_url":"https://github.com/effigies","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effigies/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effigies/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effigies/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effigies/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effigies/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effigies/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effigies/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effigies/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effigies/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-11-24T03:29:32Z","updated_at":"2015-11-24T14:34:36Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nipy/nibabel/pulls/388","html_url":"https://github.com/nipy/nibabel/pull/388","diff_url":"https://github.com/nipy/nibabel/pull/388.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/nipy/nibabel/pull/388.patch"},"body":"As of this commit, Sphinx can compile documentation when called with Python 3.\r\n\r\nIt cannot run doctests from 3, so it seems like a good opportunity to go ahead and upgrade the doctests. It may be slow-going, though, so if we don't want to try it all in one PR, I'm open to alternatives."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nipy/nibabel/issues/comments/159285159","html_url":"https://github.com/nipy/nibabel/pull/388#issuecomment-159285159","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nipy/nibabel/issues/388","id":159285159,"user":{"login":"bcipolli","id":4072455,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4072455?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcipolli","html_url":"https://github.com/bcipolli","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcipolli/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcipolli/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcipolli/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcipolli/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcipolli/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcipolli/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcipolli/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcipolli/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcipolli/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-11-24T14:34:36Z","updated_at":"2015-11-24T14:34:36Z","body":"Those doctests can be skipped, or the output can be made more generic. Had to do this quite a bit while making `nipype` doctests Python2/3 compatible.\r\n\r\n`type(data_array).__name__` may work.\r\n\r\nOr append `# doctest: +SKIP` to the `type()` line, to have it print for documentation but skip the test aspect.\r\n"}}