{"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/apache/spark/comments/12336509","html_url":"https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f5b6dc5e3e7e3b586096b71164f052318b840e8a#commitcomment-12336509","id":12336509,"user":{"login":"pwendell","id":320616,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/320616?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pwendell","html_url":"https://github.com/pwendell","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pwendell/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pwendell/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pwendell/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pwendell/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pwendell/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pwendell/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pwendell/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pwendell/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pwendell/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"position":null,"line":null,"path":"","commit_id":"f5b6dc5e3e7e3b586096b71164f052318b840e8a","created_at":"2015-07-24T05:55:46Z","updated_at":"2015-07-24T05:55:46Z","body":"Hey @srowen @mallman - can we actually revert the fact that this patch changes the name of the script? The improvement seems just like a minor cosmetic, and this is a major incompatibility pain for everyone who builds for 2.11. For instance, it broke our own test harness. Also, it will make it confusing for users who stumble on old docs that have the existing script name. I just don't see compelling reason to change it given this high cost."}}