{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/julia/issues/7799","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/julia/issues/7799/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/julia/issues/7799/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/julia/issues/7799/events","html_url":"https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/7799","id":39177282,"number":7799,"title":"extensible bounds checking removal","user":{"login":"ivarne","id":131616,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/131616?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ivarne","html_url":"https://github.com/ivarne","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ivarne/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ivarne/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ivarne/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ivarne/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ivarne/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ivarne/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ivarne/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ivarne/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ivarne/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/julia/milestones/11","html_url":"https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/milestones/0.4.0","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/julia/milestones/11/labels","id":748886,"number":11,"title":"0.4.0","description":"For tracking release-defining items for 0.4: important new features, breaking changes, and blocking bugs.\r\n\r\nAfter a brief period for deciding scope, adding issues to this milestone is not allowed. Once the items in this milestone are done, 0.4 will enter its stabilizing period and a release candidate can be made soon after.","creator":{"login":"JeffBezanson","id":744556,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/744556?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/JeffBezanson","html_url":"https://github.com/JeffBezanson","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JeffBezanson/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JeffBezanson/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JeffBezanson/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JeffBezanson/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JeffBezanson/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JeffBezanson/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JeffBezanson/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JeffBezanson/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JeffBezanson/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"open_issues":10,"closed_issues":53,"state":"open","created_at":"2014-08-10T18:13:46Z","updated_at":"2015-06-30T06:08:55Z","due_on":"2015-06-20T18:30:00Z","closed_at":null},"comments":48,"created_at":"2014-07-31T09:22:50Z","updated_at":"2015-06-30T22:46:24Z","closed_at":null,"body":"For user written short functions that have a huge overhead from bounds checking, it would be nice if it was possible to hook into the `boundscheck` system with `@inbounds` in order to let the user be able to disable manual bounds checking inside the function.\r\n\r\nThis might be beneficial for `SubString`, `SubArray`, and many wrapping types that have to check bounds before forwarding to the internal storage.\r\n\r\nOne suggestion is to have a `@bounds` macro that you can wrap the optional checking code in, but that seems somewhat brittle.\r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/julia/issues/comments/117365512","html_url":"https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/7799#issuecomment-117365512","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/julia/issues/7799","id":117365512,"user":{"login":"mbauman","id":154641,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/154641?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbauman","html_url":"https://github.com/mbauman","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbauman/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbauman/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbauman/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbauman/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbauman/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbauman/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbauman/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbauman/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbauman/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-06-30T22:46:24Z","updated_at":"2015-06-30T22:46:24Z","body":"The consensus seems to be in strong favor of decoupling `@inbounds` from inlining.  The issue isn't just if it doesn't inline, but also if *too much* inlines.  That means that a base method effectively sticks `@inbounds` annotations all throughout user code.  None of us like that prospect."}}