{"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UniversalMediaServer/UniversalMediaServer/comments/13650100","html_url":"https://github.com/UniversalMediaServer/UniversalMediaServer/commit/b80aaffe47818e70a3530c6d0a7e0d2d6ac5581d#commitcomment-13650100","id":13650100,"user":{"login":"Nadahar","id":12900583,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12900583?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nadahar","html_url":"https://github.com/Nadahar","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nadahar/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nadahar/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nadahar/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nadahar/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nadahar/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nadahar/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nadahar/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nadahar/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nadahar/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"position":null,"line":null,"path":"","commit_id":"b80aaffe47818e70a3530c6d0a7e0d2d6ac5581d","created_at":"2015-10-07T21:39:06Z","updated_at":"2015-10-07T21:39:06Z","body":"@skeptical Ok. First, as I've said from the start I agree that checking for file/folder permissions is the correct thing to do. It's what we say to the users if permissions are lacking I'm worrying about, imo it's all about giving the users information that's most likely to help them resolve it, and I think that differs slightly from OS to OS. \r\n\r\nPlatform independent is such a nice pluss word and sounds great in theory, but trying to abstract ourselves from the fact that the users will be on some actual platform isn't helpful as I see it. Whenever the different platforms need special treatment we should give special treatment. What you've done now (message wise) is to make it more logical to Linux users and less logical to non-technical Windows users. How is that embracing platform independence?\r\n\r\nAbout the translations I thing you're taking on a typical \"english speakers\" stance. It's so easy to belittle issues you don't have to deal with. The state of the translations are terrible, and this attitude is probably to blame for much of it. I'm trying to do something about that, but it's a bit demotivating if others won't even care to take it into consideration.\r\n\r\nI really don't know how to interpret \"Should program development be driven by translating convenience?\". Are you suggesting that the problem is that the translators are lazy? Should we just tell those that choose to help us with the translations to pull themselves together and read through all the texts again and again because we can't be bothered to create new labels?\r\n\r\nIf the underlying issue is that you don't think localization is necessary then that should be discussed as an issue instead. It would certainly be a lot less job, and reduce the potential user base significantly. What language should UMS use then? Both Mandarin and Chinese is spoken by more people than English, so I assume we should use one of them then?"}}