{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rmosolgo/graphql-ruby/issues/72","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rmosolgo/graphql-ruby/issues/72/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rmosolgo/graphql-ruby/issues/72/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rmosolgo/graphql-ruby/issues/72/events","html_url":"https://github.com/rmosolgo/graphql-ruby/issues/72","id":120269781,"number":72,"title":"Docs: for array fields, explain why \"!\" is needed twice","user":{"login":"kliuless","id":307761,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/307761?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless","html_url":"https://github.com/kliuless","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-12-03T21:05:34Z","updated_at":"2015-12-07T19:44:30Z","closed_at":null,"body":"It's not clear what the difference is between these two type definitions:\r\n```ruby\r\ntype !types[types.String]  # no \"!\" for wrapped type\r\n```\r\nand\r\n```ruby\r\ntype !types[!types.String]  # wrapped type has \"!\" also\r\n```\r\n\r\nThe tests seem to only use the 2nd form, but the first seems to work. Is there a difference?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rmosolgo/graphql-ruby/issues/comments/162637825","html_url":"https://github.com/rmosolgo/graphql-ruby/issues/72#issuecomment-162637825","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rmosolgo/graphql-ruby/issues/72","id":162637825,"user":{"login":"kliuless","id":307761,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/307761?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless","html_url":"https://github.com/kliuless","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kliuless/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-07T19:44:30Z","updated_at":"2015-12-07T19:44:30Z","body":"Thanks for the info. I think it's fine for the gem not to validate results; it was just my intuition that thought it was happening.\r\nWould be good to mention in the docs if it's not already there."}}