{"push_id":605775008,"size":1,"distinct_size":1,"ref":"refs/heads/send_patches_upstream","head":"ed5bdebe257db8e40050d30e1b4f4cfeb2d3acfc","before":"9f298af8e72b0c76035b8edf0b63efba6b5278d9","commits":[{"sha":"ed5bdebe257db8e40050d30e1b4f4cfeb2d3acfc","author":{"email":"f1fb2c614d1dda5801402d7e41d198ebe1881f0a@brocade.com","name":"Alan Dewar"},"message":"Allow multiple RFC groups to work on a single intf\n\n* When using RFC-compliant groups, each group uses the underlying ethernet\ninterface for receiving packets, but creates an individual VIF interface when\nthe group goes into the Master state.  The mapping between RFC groups and the\nsockets to the interfaces was broken meaning that all the groups tried to\nsend out of the first VIF interface, and when this VIF went down (because the\nfirst group dropped to the Backup state), the VRRP advertisements for any\nother groups in the Master state sharing this VIF were not sent by the kernel.\nThis led to the appearance that for the subsequent groups, both VRRP routers\nwere in the Master state.\n\nSigned-off-by: Colin Docherty <cdochert@brocade.com>","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/coldoch/keepalived/commits/ed5bdebe257db8e40050d30e1b4f4cfeb2d3acfc"}]}