{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/web-annotation/issues/7","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/web-annotation/issues/7/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/web-annotation/issues/7/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/web-annotation/issues/7/events","html_url":"https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/7","id":45179259,"number":7,"title":"Expanded role for agents' activities","user":{"login":"azaroth42","id":871868,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/871868?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42","html_url":"https://github.com/azaroth42","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/web-annotation/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"009800"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/web-annotation/labels/model","name":"model","color":"0052cc"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/web-annotation/labels/vocab","name":"vocab","color":"0052cc"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2014-10-07T22:30:34Z","updated_at":"2015-04-09T15:49:43Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Agents might play more roles than just \"annotator\" or \"serializer\" with respect to an Annotation.  The model should allow a more complete description of the agents' activities with respect to the annotation, to ensure that an accurate provenance trail is maintained.\r\n\r\nThis issue is distinct from  #8 as this is about activities that have taken place (provenance in the PROV sense) rather than the intended audience of the annotation.\r\n\r\n__Justification__\r\n\r\nTo be discussed.\r\n\r\n__Proposal__\r\n\r\nTo be discussed,\r\n\r\n__Background__\r\n\r\nUsing PROV-O completely was discussed in the CG and there wasn't a use case presented for why the full model was required.  The decision was to not require the creation of the full model, but to ensure that it could be [derived from the information given](http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/appendices.html#ProvMapping).\r\n\r\n__Links__\r\n * [Tracker](http://www.w3.org/annotation/track/issues/5)\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/web-annotation/issues/comments/91269506","html_url":"https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/7#issuecomment-91269506","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/web-annotation/issues/7","id":91269506,"user":{"login":"azaroth42","id":871868,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/871868?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42","html_url":"https://github.com/azaroth42","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-09T15:49:43Z","updated_at":"2015-04-09T15:49:43Z","body":"\r\nI guess the question is:  Should the data model specify more roles, or should that be left to extensions.  \r\n\r\nMy preference is just for creator/annotator as recommended, and generating software as optional, then leave everything else to further communities to define as needed.  Beyond curated, I haven't heard any further roles suggested?\r\n"}}