{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/danmunn/redmine_dmsf/issues/316","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/danmunn/redmine_dmsf/issues/316/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/danmunn/redmine_dmsf/issues/316/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/danmunn/redmine_dmsf/issues/316/events","html_url":"https://github.com/danmunn/redmine_dmsf/issues/316","id":47707753,"number":316,"title":"Link between Issues and DMSF documents","user":{"login":"Pierstoval","id":3369266,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3369266?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pierstoval","html_url":"https://github.com/Pierstoval","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pierstoval/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pierstoval/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pierstoval/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pierstoval/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pierstoval/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pierstoval/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pierstoval/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pierstoval/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pierstoval/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/danmunn/redmine_dmsf/labels/type:%20enhancement","name":"type: enhancement","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":10,"created_at":"2014-11-04T12:29:07Z","updated_at":"2015-10-01T07:09:18Z","closed_at":"2015-10-01T07:09:17Z","body":"It's a following of the issue #151  which asks questions about the current Redmine system.\r\n \r\nWhat I'd like to see is a _real_ link between issues and documents.\r\n \r\nWe currently can make a link between them only by creating a custom field, allowing \"text formatting\", and writing {{dmsf(%document_id%)}} in this field if we want to link items.\r\nBut the problem is, the people who use redmine and are only managers have no time to remember this pattern, because it is freaking NOT user-friendly, and forces the manager to search for the id, which is barely sustainable for a very busy manager.\r\nA better use would be the issues-searchbox we have when we are linking a parent issue, for example.\r\n \r\nWhat I was thinking about is a completely new section in the issue, the same we have with the two sections under it. In french they're called \"Sous-tâches\" (I guess \"sub-tasks\") and \"Demandes Liées\" (I guess \"relations\" or \"associated issues\").\r\nYou can \"add\" a relationship between an issue and a document, and then it adds a link with details about the document itself : id (not mandatory, obviously), name, author, flux status, version... Any of them in fact, but the main ones are these ones in my opinion.\r\n \r\nThis tasks probably needs a new association table in the database, new views and forms, and damn myself I don't know Ruby, or I would have developed this feature.\r\n \r\nI just count on ya'll to tell me if you would find this useful ! (In fact, I REALLY need a feature like that :D ) \r\n \r\nThanks for reading and supporting this incredibly awesome plugin :heart: "}}