{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/auraphp/Aura.Payload/issues/1","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/auraphp/Aura.Payload/issues/1/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/auraphp/Aura.Payload/issues/1/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/auraphp/Aura.Payload/issues/1/events","html_url":"https://github.com/auraphp/Aura.Payload/issues/1","id":80190054,"number":1,"title":"Why is the interface in a separate repo?","user":{"login":"shadowhand","id":38203,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/38203?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/shadowhand","html_url":"https://github.com/shadowhand","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shadowhand/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shadowhand/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shadowhand/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shadowhand/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shadowhand/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shadowhand/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shadowhand/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shadowhand/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shadowhand/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2015-05-24T15:28:45Z","updated_at":"2015-05-24T18:15:32Z","closed_at":null,"body":"It's weird to me that the PayloadInterface is in a separate repository. If someone wanted to use the interface, they could do so without using the implemented class. The usability of the current interface is also questionable, since it uses a weird namespace.\r\n\r\nI think Payload and PayloadInterface should be merged into a single repository."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/auraphp/Aura.Payload/issues/comments/105045682","html_url":"https://github.com/auraphp/Aura.Payload/issues/1#issuecomment-105045682","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/auraphp/Aura.Payload/issues/1","id":105045682,"user":{"login":"pmjones","id":25754,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/25754?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmjones","html_url":"https://github.com/pmjones","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmjones/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmjones/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmjones/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmjones/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmjones/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmjones/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmjones/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmjones/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmjones/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-05-24T18:15:32Z","updated_at":"2015-05-24T18:15:32Z","body":"> That's already possible, as a developer to choose not to use the default implementation.\r\n\r\nBut then he's stuck downloading code he's not using. (I know, it's just one file; I'm addressing the principle here. ;-)\r\n\r\n> having them together in one repo reduces the cognitive overhead\r\n\r\n(/me nods) Agreed. Like I said, this is mostly an experiment to see how well it works in a small case, before I move on to a larger case. It'll be easy in future to combine the two packages if it turns out to be unwise to deliver them separately (and before a 1.0 stable, obviously)."}}