{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/reduct/discussions/issues/2","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/reduct/discussions/issues/2/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/reduct/discussions/issues/2/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/reduct/discussions/issues/2/events","html_url":"https://github.com/reduct/discussions/issues/2","id":96393120,"number":2,"title":"Package names","user":{"login":"Inkdpixels","id":1557092,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1557092?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Inkdpixels","html_url":"https://github.com/Inkdpixels","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Inkdpixels/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Inkdpixels/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Inkdpixels/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Inkdpixels/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Inkdpixels/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Inkdpixels/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Inkdpixels/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Inkdpixels/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Inkdpixels/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-07-21T19:04:35Z","updated_at":"2015-07-22T17:04:43Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Regarding the existing packages @akoenig and myself had a discussion today.\r\n\r\nWe both came to the conclusion that all packages should have a short and rememberable name, so the `ComponentDomParser` for example definitely needs a rebrand. @akoenig proposed `assembler` which I really dig(Even though it has a connection with the language itself)! So thumbs up for that!\r\n\r\nRegarding the `NodeProto` - I am unsure about that one at the moment, I think if we scope the packages under the organization name f.e. `@reduct/assembler` we could just name it `component`.\r\n\r\nWhat are your thoughts about that @grebaldi @akoenig ?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/reduct/discussions/issues/comments/123793299","html_url":"https://github.com/reduct/discussions/issues/2#issuecomment-123793299","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/reduct/discussions/issues/2","id":123793299,"user":{"login":"grebaldi","id":2522299,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2522299?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/grebaldi","html_url":"https://github.com/grebaldi","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grebaldi/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grebaldi/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grebaldi/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grebaldi/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grebaldi/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grebaldi/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grebaldi/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grebaldi/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grebaldi/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-22T17:04:43Z","updated_at":"2015-07-22T17:04:43Z","body":"Actually I've written a pretty long text just a few minutes ago, but I realized, that I didn't like my ideas :D \r\n\r\nI'm fine with ``component``, but somehow can't cope with ``assembler``. Maybe something like ``dominjector`` might be kind of appropriate... \r\n\r\nOr maybe ``weaver``? Perhaps too much adobe/macromedia in there..."}}