{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/daokoder/dao/issues/437","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/daokoder/dao/issues/437/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/daokoder/dao/issues/437/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/daokoder/dao/issues/437/events","html_url":"https://github.com/daokoder/dao/issues/437","id":95604069,"number":437,"title":"An alias for timestamps","user":{"login":"Night-walker","id":5074460,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5074460?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Night-walker","html_url":"https://github.com/Night-walker","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Night-walker/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Night-walker/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Night-walker/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Night-walker/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Night-walker/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Night-walker/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Night-walker/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Night-walker/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Night-walker/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2015-07-17T07:28:51Z","updated_at":"2015-07-17T09:36:50Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I think we need a built-in `int` alias for `time_t` values to use it in standard libraries. Something like `std::Timestamp`."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/daokoder/dao/issues/comments/122229477","html_url":"https://github.com/daokoder/dao/issues/437#issuecomment-122229477","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/daokoder/dao/issues/437","id":122229477,"user":{"login":"daokoder","id":1860002,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1860002?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/daokoder","html_url":"https://github.com/daokoder","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daokoder/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daokoder/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daokoder/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daokoder/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daokoder/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daokoder/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daokoder/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daokoder/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daokoder/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-17T09:36:50Z","updated_at":"2015-07-17T09:36:50Z","body":"> I'm not sure it's a good idea to force users to load another shared library regardless of whether they do or do not intend to work with datetimes. \r\n\r\nIf the timestamp is intended to be `time_t`-like, it is not necessary to work with `time` to use this type. But I prefer the timestamp to support fraction seconds (it can be the number of microseconds since 2000-1-1, like in PostgreSQL, since the Julian Epoch), so one might have to use `time` for this. And in this case, this timestamp should use 64 bit int."}}