{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/xproc/specification/issues/182","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/xproc/specification/issues/182/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/xproc/specification/issues/182/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/xproc/specification/issues/182/events","html_url":"https://github.com/xproc/specification/issues/182","id":87729553,"number":182,"title":"Sibling shadowing for variables should be allowed.","user":{"login":"alexmilowski","id":1141890,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1141890?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexmilowski","html_url":"https://github.com/alexmilowski","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexmilowski/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexmilowski/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexmilowski/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexmilowski/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexmilowski/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexmilowski/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexmilowski/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexmilowski/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alexmilowski/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-06-12T13:28:44Z","updated_at":"2015-06-15T17:05:23Z","closed_at":null,"body":"In the current proposed XProc 1.0 errata (E.13), we clarified that variables can shadow up but not \"left\" (preceding siblings).  We should remove this restriction in 2.0 to make XProc more like XQuery and XSLT.  Variables can be redefined in both of those languages by following sibling elements."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/xproc/specification/issues/comments/112140776","html_url":"https://github.com/xproc/specification/issues/182#issuecomment-112140776","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/xproc/specification/issues/182","id":112140776,"user":{"login":"ndw","id":36793,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/36793?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndw","html_url":"https://github.com/ndw","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndw/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndw/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndw/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndw/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndw/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndw/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndw/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndw/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndw/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-06-15T17:05:23Z","updated_at":"2015-06-15T17:05:23Z","body":"Yes, that pipeline does seem to cause an undetected loop in XML Calabash. *blush*\r\n\r\nAnd yes, even before that discovery :-), I was pretty much convinced that we should fix this in 2.0.\r\n"}}