{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/whatwg/fetch/issues/79","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/whatwg/fetch/issues/79/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/whatwg/fetch/issues/79/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/whatwg/fetch/issues/79/events","html_url":"https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/79","id":94693885,"number":79,"title":"Add a bit to Opaque Responses to distinguish redirects","user":{"login":"slightlyoff","id":97331,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/97331?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/slightlyoff","html_url":"https://github.com/slightlyoff","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slightlyoff/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slightlyoff/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slightlyoff/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slightlyoff/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slightlyoff/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slightlyoff/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slightlyoff/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slightlyoff/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slightlyoff/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-07-13T10:51:42Z","updated_at":"2015-07-16T07:39:26Z","closed_at":null,"body":"(apologies if this is a dupe)\r\n\r\n@sirdarckcat has brought up an issue (documented here: http://sirdarckcat.blogspot.de/2015/05/service-workers-secure-open-redirect.html ) that seems like it'd be mostly solved through the addition of a single bit to Response objects which notes if the content is the result of a redirect.\r\n\r\nAt the webappsec f2f today in Berlin, the group there seems to agree that exposing this bit on Responses doesn't leak any new information; it's observable via CSP + iframes already.\r\n\r\n/cc @jakearchibald @jungkees @annevk @metromoxie @hillbrad"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/whatwg/fetch/issues/comments/121864081","html_url":"https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/79#issuecomment-121864081","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/whatwg/fetch/issues/79","id":121864081,"user":{"login":"sirdarckcat","id":33089,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/33089?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sirdarckcat","html_url":"https://github.com/sirdarckcat","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sirdarckcat/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sirdarckcat/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sirdarckcat/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sirdarckcat/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sirdarckcat/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sirdarckcat/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sirdarckcat/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sirdarckcat/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sirdarckcat/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-16T07:39:26Z","updated_at":"2015-07-16T07:39:26Z","body":"The problem is that some sites are likely to install a SW that caches all\nrequests it sees.\n"}}