{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bwallace/OpenMeta-analyst-/issues/270","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bwallace/OpenMeta-analyst-/issues/270/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bwallace/OpenMeta-analyst-/issues/270/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bwallace/OpenMeta-analyst-/issues/270/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bwallace/OpenMeta-analyst-/issues/270","id":64041676,"number":270,"title":"Cumulative forest plots","user":{"login":"vlangberg","id":11543672,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/11543672?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/vlangberg","html_url":"https://github.com/vlangberg","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vlangberg/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vlangberg/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vlangberg/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vlangberg/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vlangberg/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vlangberg/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vlangberg/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vlangberg/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vlangberg/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-03-24T16:28:27Z","updated_at":"2015-03-24T16:28:27Z","closed_at":null,"body":"The two forest plots are not on the same scale.  Also, apparently normal confidence intervals are used here which are not always appropriate (e.g., with proportions near zero or one, the normal approximation gives an interval that is going to be truncated at 0 and will look strange and be inaccurate.\r\n"}}