{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/464","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/464/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/464/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/464/events","html_url":"https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/pull/464","id":72209416,"number":464,"title":"Issue #417: Renamed types/properties per suggestions","user":{"login":"vholland","id":4692272,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4692272?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/vholland","html_url":"https://github.com/vholland","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vholland/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vholland/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vholland/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vholland/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vholland/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vholland/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vholland/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vholland/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vholland/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-04-30T16:18:24Z","updated_at":"2015-05-06T21:03:52Z","closed_at":"2015-05-06T20:58:07Z","pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/pulls/464","html_url":"https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/pull/464","diff_url":"https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/pull/464.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/pull/464.patch"},"body":""},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/comments/99609440","html_url":"https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/pull/464#issuecomment-99609440","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/464","id":99609440,"user":{"login":"danbri","id":170265,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/170265?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri","html_url":"https://github.com/danbri","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danbri/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-05-06T21:03:52Z","updated_at":"2015-05-06T21:03:52Z","body":"The old vs_termStatus vocabulary we made up in the pub for FOAF had  this:\r\n \r\n* 'unstable' - The meaning, deployment practices, documentation (or important associated software/services) associated with this term are liable to change arbitrarily at some point in the future. They may not, but stability is not guaranteed. Use with caution.\r\n* 'testing' - The meaning, deployment practices, documentation and general understanding of this term are approaching some stability, but changes are still possible due to implementation experience or other unanticipated factors.\r\n* 'stable' The term is relatively stable, and its documentation and meaning are not expected to change substantially.\r\n* 'archaic' This term is marked as old-fashioned; although used, it is not considered typical of current best practice and alternative expressions may be preferable.\r\n\r\nWe preferred to say \"archaic\" instead of \"deprecated\", but maybe that's too cutesy? The point was to not make people feel bad for having adopted against earlier versions of the spec, and to acknowledge that the term would continue to mean whatever it was that it meant earlier rather than \"dissapeared\" completely. Non-spec at http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/note\r\n\r\nIf these definitions are a reasonable start, I can reflect them into a schema.org enumeration trivially. I'd prefer discussion here to confirm first."}}