{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/trendwerk/post-type-as-taxonomy/issues/1","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/trendwerk/post-type-as-taxonomy/issues/1/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/trendwerk/post-type-as-taxonomy/issues/1/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/trendwerk/post-type-as-taxonomy/issues/1/events","html_url":"https://github.com/trendwerk/post-type-as-taxonomy/issues/1","id":93978637,"number":1,"title":"Work In Reverse","user":{"login":"NatESkiN","id":13084499,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/13084499?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/NatESkiN","html_url":"https://github.com/NatESkiN","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NatESkiN/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NatESkiN/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NatESkiN/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NatESkiN/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NatESkiN/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NatESkiN/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NatESkiN/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NatESkiN/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NatESkiN/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-07-09T07:30:05Z","updated_at":"2015-07-09T07:30:05Z","closed_at":null,"body":"It works perfectly, but I think it would be a good idea to also work in reverse. If you add a content taxonomy, which also appears as content in the post type.\r\n\r\nWhat do you like?"}}