{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TauLabs/TauLabs/issues/2059","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TauLabs/TauLabs/issues/2059/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TauLabs/TauLabs/issues/2059/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TauLabs/TauLabs/issues/2059/events","html_url":"https://github.com/TauLabs/TauLabs/issues/2059","id":116960275,"number":2059,"title":"Arm Settings are Deceptive - and dangerous!","user":{"login":"SystemsGuy","id":2819484,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2819484?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy","html_url":"https://github.com/SystemsGuy","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-11-14T23:42:45Z","updated_at":"2015-11-19T15:30:56Z","closed_at":null,"body":"\r\nWhen setting \"arming\", the text on the page specifically states that you are selecting an option \"+ low throttle\".  This is not the case with switch arming, where you have to explicitly select \"switch + low throttle\".\r\n\r\nI believe this creates a dangerous situation  Rather than have \"Switch + Throttle\" the selection in fact should be \"Switch + IGNORE throttle\" if you want to arm at a non-zero throttle value.  In reality this should probably be \"not neutral\" throttle as opposed to \"low/high\" so that at some point in the future we can support reverse throttle.\r\n![arm](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2819484/11166391/1b003794-8af7-11e5-9aab-ea3e2d4dc442.jpg)\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TauLabs/TauLabs/issues/comments/158090565","html_url":"https://github.com/TauLabs/TauLabs/issues/2059#issuecomment-158090565","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TauLabs/TauLabs/issues/2059","id":158090565,"user":{"login":"SystemsGuy","id":2819484,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2819484?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy","html_url":"https://github.com/SystemsGuy","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SystemsGuy/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-11-19T15:30:56Z","updated_at":"2015-11-19T15:30:56Z","body":"True, but all of the options with the exception of switch arming respect the throttle setting - maybe it's just me, but it seems counterintutive for switch arming to be different.\r\n\r\nMy issue is that seeing the word \"switch\" to me implied \"switch + low throttle\" - which is not the case - if I'd looked further down and noticed the \"switch + throttle\" maybe I would have realized what was going on.  My suggestion is simply that we make it more obvious that selecting \"switch\" arming will allows you to arm at full throttle."}}