{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/andrewabest/Conventional/issues/3","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/andrewabest/Conventional/issues/3/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/andrewabest/Conventional/issues/3/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/andrewabest/Conventional/issues/3/events","html_url":"https://github.com/andrewabest/Conventional/issues/3","id":66511226,"number":3,"title":"How to implement an async convention that requires Mono.Cecil","user":{"login":"michael-wolfenden","id":780521,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/780521?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/michael-wolfenden","html_url":"https://github.com/michael-wolfenden","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michael-wolfenden/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michael-wolfenden/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michael-wolfenden/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michael-wolfenden/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michael-wolfenden/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michael-wolfenden/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michael-wolfenden/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michael-wolfenden/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michael-wolfenden/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-04-06T02:46:28Z","updated_at":"2015-04-06T02:46:28Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I was thinking of adding a new async convention that for library code checks whether all tasks that are awaited have `ConfigureAwait(false)` set.\r\n \r\nThis requires the use of Mono.Cecil to detect, however the conventions are split into seperate 'Async' and 'Cecil' projects.\r\n\r\nWhat do you suggest?"}}