{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/issues/782","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/issues/782/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/issues/782/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/issues/782/events","html_url":"https://github.com/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/issues/782","id":73196350,"number":782,"title":"Implement analyzers for StyleCop+ rules (SPxxxx)","user":{"login":"maboivin","id":4491851,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4491851?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/maboivin","html_url":"https://github.com/maboivin","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maboivin/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maboivin/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maboivin/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maboivin/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maboivin/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maboivin/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maboivin/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maboivin/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maboivin/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/labels/question","name":"question","color":"cc317c"}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-05-05T03:47:45Z","updated_at":"2015-09-14T14:28:41Z","closed_at":"2015-05-05T04:01:44Z","body":"It would be nice if you could add analyzers for StyleCop+ rules (SPxxxx). You can find the source code here on github: https://github.com/shuruev/StyleCopPlus."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/issues/comments/140098793","html_url":"https://github.com/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/issues/782#issuecomment-140098793","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/issues/782","id":140098793,"user":{"login":"DavidArno","id":196899,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/196899?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidArno","html_url":"https://github.com/DavidArno","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidArno/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidArno/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidArno/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidArno/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidArno/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidArno/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidArno/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidArno/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidArno/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-09-14T14:28:41Z","updated_at":"2015-09-14T14:28:41Z","body":"@bmenees, what was your reason for creating a separate analyser to StyleCopAnalyzers, rather than including them here?\r\n\r\n@sharwell, your position on StyleCop+ seems a little unclear. For me at least (and I'm sure many others), StyleCop+ transformed StyleCop and it's vital that all its rules be implemented to make StyleCopAnalyzers a viable replacement tool. Here you seem to suggest that we can propose those rules. Elsewhere (https://github.com/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/issues/422#issuecomment-128703160) you state that StyleCop+ rules won't be implemented, even if they are proposed. Also I'm puzzled by the idea that proposed rules like this need to be approved. Are you saying that if, for example, I implement SP2103 (files must not be more than n lines long) and submit a pull request, then it could be rejected simply because you or other existing contributors don't like it?"}}