{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/inovance/traide-issues-public/issues/19","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/inovance/traide-issues-public/issues/19/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/inovance/traide-issues-public/issues/19/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/inovance/traide-issues-public/issues/19/events","html_url":"https://github.com/inovance/traide-issues-public/issues/19","id":63269923,"number":19,"title":"Indicators - folders with single indicator, information architecture","user":{"login":"mglowacki100","id":6077538,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6077538?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mglowacki100","html_url":"https://github.com/mglowacki100","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mglowacki100/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mglowacki100/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mglowacki100/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mglowacki100/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mglowacki100/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mglowacki100/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mglowacki100/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mglowacki100/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mglowacki100/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-03-20T17:29:22Z","updated_at":"2015-03-20T17:29:22Z","closed_at":null,"body":"1. There is a lot of folders with single indicator. Unless you don't have plans for more indicators in those folders, you should remove unnessary level in hiearchy.\r\n2. Order of indicators within folder (now it looks random to me):\r\ni) first approach - just alphabetic order\r\nii) second approach - copy order from MT or any other popular trading platform\r\n3. Relative RSI and Stochastic RSI should be close together\r\n\r\n"}}