{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ipfs/go-ipfs/issues/2044","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ipfs/go-ipfs/issues/2044/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ipfs/go-ipfs/issues/2044/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ipfs/go-ipfs/issues/2044/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/issues/2044","id":120678483,"number":2044,"title":"`ipfs mount` failure in travis-ci","user":{"login":"thelinuxkid","id":459925,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/459925?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/thelinuxkid","html_url":"https://github.com/thelinuxkid","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thelinuxkid/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thelinuxkid/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thelinuxkid/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thelinuxkid/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thelinuxkid/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thelinuxkid/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thelinuxkid/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thelinuxkid/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thelinuxkid/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-12-07T00:52:47Z","updated_at":"2015-12-07T05:16:45Z","closed_at":null,"body":"When fuse is enabled in travis, the sharness test for `ipfs mount` fails with `failed to find any peer in table`"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ipfs/go-ipfs/issues/comments/162414358","html_url":"https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/issues/2044#issuecomment-162414358","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ipfs/go-ipfs/issues/2044","id":162414358,"user":{"login":"jbenet","id":138401,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/138401?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet","html_url":"https://github.com/jbenet","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbenet/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-07T05:16:45Z","updated_at":"2015-12-07T05:16:45Z","body":"we may want to re-evaluate these error conditions. i think in general it may be good to `log.Error` that (or maybe `log.Warning`, really) and not \"fail things specially\" here"}}