{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mrkkrp/megaparsec/issues/10","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mrkkrp/megaparsec/issues/10/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mrkkrp/megaparsec/issues/10/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mrkkrp/megaparsec/issues/10/events","html_url":"https://github.com/mrkkrp/megaparsec/issues/10","id":98537604,"number":10,"title":"MegaParsec or Megaparsec?","user":{"login":"neongreen","id":1523306,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1523306?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/neongreen","html_url":"https://github.com/neongreen","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/neongreen/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/neongreen/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/neongreen/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/neongreen/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/neongreen/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/neongreen/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/neongreen/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/neongreen/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/neongreen/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-08-01T13:31:09Z","updated_at":"2015-08-01T13:31:09Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Pros of MegaParsec:\r\n\r\n* It's more obvious that it's related to Parsec. (Is it actually a good thing?)\r\n\r\nCons of MegaParsec:\r\n\r\n* “parsec” is a unit of measurement, so it shouldn't be capitalised in “megaparsec”.\r\n* “Megaparsec” is consistent with “Attoparsec” and “Picoparsec”, 2 other libraries with “parsec” in them.\r\n* I suspect (but can't prove) that everyone who uses ThisCapitalisation in nir product's name regrets it when the product becomes popular."}}