{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opengeospatial/ets-csw202/issues/6","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opengeospatial/ets-csw202/issues/6/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opengeospatial/ets-csw202/issues/6/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opengeospatial/ets-csw202/issues/6/events","html_url":"https://github.com/opengeospatial/ets-csw202/issues/6","id":69036373,"number":6,"title":"Timezone isn't valid for a dc:date","user":{"login":"tastle","id":1140570,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1140570?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tastle","html_url":"https://github.com/tastle","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tastle/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tastle/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tastle/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tastle/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tastle/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tastle/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tastle/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tastle/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tastle/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-04-17T00:28:14Z","updated_at":"2015-04-17T00:28:14Z","closed_at":null,"body":"There are several tests in the GetRecords script that have have filters like:\r\n\r\n```xml\r\n<ogc:PropertyIsGreaterThan>\r\n    <ogc:PropertyName>dc:date</ogc:PropertyName>\r\n    <ogc:Literal>2004-01-01Z</ogc:Literal>\r\n</ogc:PropertyIsGreaterThan>\r\n```\r\n\r\nThe problem is that the literal isn't a valid date.  Dates don't have timezones.  Omitting the Z makes the date valid.  The other option would be to do 2004-01-01TZ, but the spec seems to be pretty clear on using a date, not a date time.\r\n\r\nDoes anyone else have any thoughts on this?"}}