{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/neilj/Squire/issues/75","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/neilj/Squire/issues/75/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/neilj/Squire/issues/75/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/neilj/Squire/issues/75/events","html_url":"https://github.com/neilj/Squire/issues/75","id":71521712,"number":75,"title":"No npm package","user":{"login":"gertsonderby","id":783639,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/783639?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gertsonderby","html_url":"https://github.com/gertsonderby","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gertsonderby/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gertsonderby/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gertsonderby/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gertsonderby/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gertsonderby/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gertsonderby/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gertsonderby/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gertsonderby/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gertsonderby/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-04-28T08:28:43Z","updated_at":"2015-05-03T06:22:36Z","closed_at":"2015-05-03T06:22:36Z","body":"It seems like there ought to be an npm package in for this editor. Many front-end libraries use it, and support for including npm packages is improving (see systemjs for an excellent example). So would such a thing be possible? There already exists a `squire` package - a front-end build tool of some sort - but this could be named `squire-rte`, or `squire-editor`?\r\n\r\nFor my own purposes, I could get around this by maintaining a private package on our closed npm repository, but it would be far better for everyone if the package was public."}}