{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/issues/646","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/issues/646/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/issues/646/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/issues/646/events","html_url":"https://github.com/openETCS/modeling/issues/646","id":99912889,"number":646,"title":"InformationFilter: When working on Msg 3 : Concept of Delayed Messages does not fit to the use-case","user":{"login":"BerndHekele","id":3288918,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3288918?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele","html_url":"https://github.com/BerndHekele","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/labels/bug","name":"bug","color":"fc2929"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/labels/bug%20in%20Integration","name":"bug in Integration","color":"e11d21"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":{"login":"BerndHekele","id":3288918,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3288918?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele","html_url":"https://github.com/BerndHekele","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BerndHekele/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-08-09T16:48:24Z","updated_at":"2015-08-09T17:44:13Z","closed_at":null,"body":"When analysing the information filter we had a long discussion on whether complete messages need to be  stored or only packets.\r\n\r\nLooking into msg 3 of our 7th scenario, I believe we made the wrond decision.\r\n\r\nMsg 3 has packet 41 and packet 15 for nominal direction.\r\n\r\nPacket 41 indicates the requested level transition to level 2.\r\nFirst problem: in the current implementation, the information level 2 transition pending comes from a later cycle back to the entry.\r\nProposed solution: packet 41 is evaluated as a part of the handling of the incoming message.\r\nOtherwise, the complete message has to be ignored.\r\n\r\nSecond problem: packet 41 has to be forwarded to level management, packet 15 (and others) have to be stored for after the level transition.\r\n\r\nWith this use-case, we have two potential reasons for the error: message flow is not correct or the element filter needs to be able to split this information in parts to store and parts to send.\r\n\r\nI will take care for a work-around \r\n@BaseliyosJacob : can you please analyse the use-case."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/issues/comments/129221522","html_url":"https://github.com/openETCS/modeling/issues/646#issuecomment-129221522","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openETCS/modeling/issues/646","id":129221522,"user":{"login":"JakobGartner","id":8400941,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8400941?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner","html_url":"https://github.com/JakobGartner","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakobGartner/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-09T17:44:13Z","updated_at":"2015-08-09T17:44:13Z","body":"All this is working in the balise model and the radio message model inside\nthe AmsterdamUtrecht project\n\n\nOn 09.08.2015, at 19:40, Baseliyos Jacob <notifications@github.com> wrote:\n\nNext Step\n\nMessage 3\n\nComes with Packet 15, 21, 27,3, 5,41, 65\n\nPacket 41 Level Transition Order should triggering the Level Transiion\nchange on the Level and Mode Management\n\n[image: image]\n<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3975810/9156077/7c783532-3ece-11e5-82c9-ebc4d85fc721.png>\n\n—\nReply to this email directly or view it on GitHub\n<https://github.com/openETCS/modeling/issues/646#issuecomment-129221283>.\n"}}