{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lib/pq/issues/399","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lib/pq/issues/399/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lib/pq/issues/399/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lib/pq/issues/399/events","html_url":"https://github.com/lib/pq/pull/399","id":109857409,"number":399,"title":"include Go 1.5 and allow tip to fail","user":{"login":"kr","id":4178,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4178?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kr","html_url":"https://github.com/kr","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kr/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kr/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kr/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kr/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kr/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kr/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kr/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kr/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kr/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2015-10-05T18:28:24Z","updated_at":"2015-10-07T19:35:14Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lib/pq/pulls/399","html_url":"https://github.com/lib/pq/pull/399","diff_url":"https://github.com/lib/pq/pull/399.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/lib/pq/pull/399.patch"},"body":"Go 1.5 was released in August of 2015.\r\n\r\nThe \"tip\" version of Go isn't guaranteed to be backwards\r\ncompatible or even stable, so those builds might fail\r\nfor reasons unrelated to any lib/pq pull request. It's\r\nuseful to see the results, but they shouldn't block a\r\npull request from being landed."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lib/pq/issues/comments/146304669","html_url":"https://github.com/lib/pq/pull/399#issuecomment-146304669","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lib/pq/issues/399","id":146304669,"user":{"login":"johto","id":951744,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/951744?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/johto","html_url":"https://github.com/johto","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johto/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johto/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johto/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johto/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johto/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johto/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johto/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johto/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johto/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-10-07T19:35:14Z","updated_at":"2015-10-07T19:35:14Z","body":"> For what it's worth, I'm convinced by @kr's argument here (but of course I'm not going to force a merge through by myself, especially since I'm minimally active now).\r\n\r\nWhich part exactly?  It seems to me that the PR makes the tests run less often (or the failures invisible, which AIUI in practice is the same thing), yet he would actually like to run the tests *more* often.  The reasoning seems to be a straw man representing belief that committers won't look at PRs if they don't pass tests, which to me suggests a fundamental lack of faith in the committers.\r\n\r\nThe only actual issue I see with the current setup which this *would* improve is that a (possibly less experienced) developer wouldn't have to go around chasing tip failures for their PR.  But I don't think the tip is broken often enough for that to actually truly matter."}}