{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam/issues/2060","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam/issues/2060/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam/issues/2060/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam/issues/2060/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ocaml/opam/issues/2060","id":62477254,"number":2060,"title":"Option to bypass locks","user":{"login":"samoht","id":103693,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/103693?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/samoht","html_url":"https://github.com/samoht","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/samoht/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/samoht/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/samoht/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/samoht/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/samoht/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/samoht/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/samoht/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/samoht/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/samoht/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-03-17T18:26:05Z","updated_at":"2015-03-18T01:37:54Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Would be nice to have an option to bypass the locks. While testing mirage apps, the `mirage configure` phase calls `opam install`, so if you happen to run `mirage configure` in `build` you are screwed. \r\n\r\nWould be nice to have an option to give to opam in that case (which can be used directly in the `mirage` tool)."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam/issues/comments/82672783","html_url":"https://github.com/ocaml/opam/issues/2060#issuecomment-82672783","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam/issues/2060","id":82672783,"user":{"login":"AltGr","id":807966,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/807966?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/AltGr","html_url":"https://github.com/AltGr","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AltGr/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AltGr/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AltGr/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AltGr/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AltGr/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AltGr/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AltGr/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AltGr/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AltGr/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-03-18T01:37:54Z","updated_at":"2015-03-18T01:37:54Z","body":"You really want dynamic dependencies then %)\r\nWhat's the issue with my last suggestion then ? It's equivalent, self-documenting, and doesn't advertise doing it from OPAM."}}