{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/issues/4670","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/issues/4670/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/issues/4670/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/issues/4670/events","html_url":"https://github.com/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/issues/4670","id":122774960,"number":4670,"title":"Stats on implicit dependencies","user":{"login":"ashfurrow","id":498212,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/498212?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ashfurrow","html_url":"https://github.com/ashfurrow","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ashfurrow/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ashfurrow/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ashfurrow/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ashfurrow/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ashfurrow/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ashfurrow/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ashfurrow/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ashfurrow/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ashfurrow/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-12-17T16:51:47Z","updated_at":"2015-12-17T16:51:47Z","closed_at":null,"body":"From @searls' [talk on open source thingies](https://youtu.be/e_-qV8waPVM?t=577), I saw the following idea:\r\n\r\n<img width=\"1440\" alt=\"screen shot 2015-12-16 at 8 00 37 pm\" src=\"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/498212/11875707/03149360-a4b4-11e5-921a-b44e9f0e9026.png\">\r\n\r\nI think this would be really cool for CocoaPods. I may take a stab at the easy parts (like # of transitive dependencies) but I imagine the information about # of pods that you'd be unable to use requires more discussion."}}