{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MailOnline/videojs-vast-vpaid/issues/60","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MailOnline/videojs-vast-vpaid/issues/60/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MailOnline/videojs-vast-vpaid/issues/60/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MailOnline/videojs-vast-vpaid/issues/60/events","html_url":"https://github.com/MailOnline/videojs-vast-vpaid/issues/60","id":106828125,"number":60,"title":"Release Process -- Should we use RELEASE branch or master?","user":{"login":"joshmadewell","id":3503785,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3503785?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/joshmadewell","html_url":"https://github.com/joshmadewell","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joshmadewell/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joshmadewell/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joshmadewell/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joshmadewell/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joshmadewell/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joshmadewell/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joshmadewell/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joshmadewell/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joshmadewell/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-09-16T18:06:01Z","updated_at":"2015-09-18T16:28:18Z","closed_at":"2015-09-18T16:28:18Z","body":"Hey Guys,\r\n\r\nWe have a few changes to the repo that we maintain ourselves because they are most likely features that you don't want added.\r\n\r\nAs such, when a release is made, we pull down your repo and manually merge the release into our copy of the repo. I noticed that there is  `RELEASE` branch with the latest release and  that it's 15 ahead of `master`. Is this the branch we should pull down moving forward?\r\n\r\nI guess worth asking is: would you guys be open to implementing the ability to call `stopAd` from the browser? I think I mentioned this before and @Fetz  mentioned you would not be implementing it but that I could look at how `skipAd` was implemented to do it myself. We've gone ahead and done this. \r\n\r\nThe reason we needed `stopAd` is because some our publishers require the ability for a user to close an ad after N seconds. VPAID spec requires us to call `stopAd` because the browser has stopped displaying the ad.\r\n\r\n"}}