{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/abritinthebay/datejs/issues/198","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/abritinthebay/datejs/issues/198/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/abritinthebay/datejs/issues/198/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/abritinthebay/datejs/issues/198/events","html_url":"https://github.com/abritinthebay/datejs/issues/198","id":30745553,"number":198,"title":"Question: Date object","user":{"login":"crash2burn","id":23372,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/23372?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/crash2burn","html_url":"https://github.com/crash2burn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crash2burn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crash2burn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crash2burn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crash2burn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crash2burn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crash2burn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crash2burn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crash2burn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crash2burn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":22,"created_at":"2014-04-03T04:15:28Z","updated_at":"2015-02-20T17:24:19Z","closed_at":"2014-04-03T05:52:48Z","body":"I'm sure this has been asked before, but why overload/overwrite Date - only thing that makes me sad inside about this library, would be amazing as a new object (like moment.js). I understand the original library did the overloading as well but just wanted to know if there was a reason more than that? Thanks for the awesome work."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/abritinthebay/datejs/issues/comments/75279958","html_url":"https://github.com/abritinthebay/datejs/issues/198#issuecomment-75279958","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/abritinthebay/datejs/issues/198","id":75279958,"user":{"login":"abritinthebay","id":492797,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/492797?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/abritinthebay","html_url":"https://github.com/abritinthebay","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abritinthebay/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abritinthebay/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abritinthebay/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abritinthebay/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abritinthebay/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abritinthebay/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abritinthebay/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abritinthebay/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/abritinthebay/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-02-20T17:24:19Z","updated_at":"2015-02-20T17:24:19Z","body":"I addressed that above with the choosing libraries and overreaching libraries response.\r\n\r\nIf a developer is including libraries that do the same thing (or conflicting things) *then that developer is not doing something incorrectly* and at least one of the libraries *is doing too much*.\r\n\r\nDateJS does dates. That's it. SugarJS in theory would be compatible behind the scenes but might run into the current non-native behavior issues which is why I want to get those removed for the next major version.\r\n\r\nBut again - this is an argument for favoring slopping coding practices over sane library design and I'm sorry: I refuse to prioritize bad practice over sensible object extension."}}