{"push_id":687092089,"size":1,"distinct_size":1,"ref":"refs/heads/master","head":"3b2e9a1836094fc504eb413f31079f73517c7eb6","before":"e8466e0abfcd623467cb1200732d883092554004","commits":[{"sha":"3b2e9a1836094fc504eb413f31079f73517c7eb6","author":{"email":"181323dd666a182bc2d953e52d0ac3ab54cd8391@pengutronix.de","name":"Uwe Kleine-König"},"message":"ARM: 8160/1: drop warning about return_address not using unwind tables\n\nThe warning was introduced in 2009 (commit 4bf1fa5a34aa ([ARM] 5613/1:\nimplement CALLER_ADDRESSx)). The only \"problem\" here is that\nCALLER_ADDRESSx for x > 1 returns NULL which doesn't do much harm.\n\nThe drawback of implementing a fix (i.e. use unwind tables to implement CALLER_ADDRESSx) is that much of the unwinder code would need to be marked as not\ntraceable.\n\nChange-Id: I1833481898c3403aa2faafa8c36a819774aa3eee\nSigned-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>\nSigned-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>\n\nConflicts:\n\tarch/arm/kernel/return_address.c","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/WildfireDEV/ElementalX-Sense-5.0.2/commits/3b2e9a1836094fc504eb413f31079f73517c7eb6"}]}