{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aspnet/Home/issues/261","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aspnet/Home/issues/261/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aspnet/Home/issues/261/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aspnet/Home/issues/261/events","html_url":"https://github.com/aspnet/Home/issues/261","id":53586764,"number":261,"title":"CommunityStandup: Can we rename K?","user":{"login":"glennc","id":234688,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/234688?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/glennc","html_url":"https://github.com/glennc","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glennc/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glennc/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glennc/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glennc/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glennc/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glennc/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glennc/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glennc/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glennc/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aspnet/Home/labels/discussion","name":"discussion","color":"009800"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":8,"created_at":"2015-01-07T01:30:28Z","updated_at":"2015-01-07T02:32:18Z","closed_at":null,"body":"In the community stand up today @shanselman asked if we should rename K, KPM, and KVM.\r\n\r\nHis suggestion was dotnet, so that we would have:\r\n\r\nk -> dotnet\r\nkpm -> nuget\r\nkvm -> dotnetsdk\r\n\r\nI've heard other suggestions about this in the past, and kpm changing to nuget seems fairly common, most people are ok with that.\r\n\r\nThe other decision is what to call the command that runs an app, the version manager name falls out of that. Dotnet makes sense \r\n\r\nThis issue is to discuss that, what do you all think of changing K to dotnet, so that the command to run an app is “dotnet foo”?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aspnet/Home/issues/comments/68970818","html_url":"https://github.com/aspnet/Home/issues/261#issuecomment-68970818","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aspnet/Home/issues/261","id":68970818,"user":{"login":"anurse","id":7574,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7574?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/anurse","html_url":"https://github.com/anurse","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anurse/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anurse/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anurse/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anurse/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anurse/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anurse/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anurse/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anurse/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anurse/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-01-07T02:32:18Z","updated_at":"2015-01-07T02:32:18Z","body":"I'm not sure it would take much more. The runtime package itself would come with a native executable, much like it does now (`klr`) to do the actual booting. Then `dotnet` would incorporate the functionality currently found in `k` and `kvm`. The `k` command is barely a command at all, implementation-wise it's just a simple call to `klr.exe`.\r\n\r\nI realize it differs from the existing node/ruby environments, but we don't have to duplicate them :). We just want to take inspiration and build something (we hope is) better (or at least more suited to our scenarios)"}}