{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecma262/issues/199","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecma262/issues/199/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecma262/issues/199/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecma262/issues/199/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/199","id":117316946,"number":199,"title":"JP22: character reference inconsistency in 20.1.3.2, 20.1.3.3 and 20.1.3.5","user":{"login":"akr","id":10538,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10538?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/akr","html_url":"https://github.com/akr","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/akr/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/akr/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/akr/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/akr/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/akr/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/akr/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/akr/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/akr/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/akr/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-11-17T09:38:04Z","updated_at":"2015-12-02T00:09:04Z","closed_at":null,"body":"In the sections 20.1.3.2 (Number.prototype.toExponential), 20.1.3.3 (Number.prototype.toFixed) and 20.1.3.5 (Number.prototype.toPrecision), characters are referenced inconsistently.\r\nFor example, 20.1.3.2 step 13.b. and 20.1.3.3 step 10.c.iv refers a character as \".\" but\r\n20.1.3.5 step 12.c.iii refers it as \"code unit 0x002E (FULL STOP)\".\r\n\r\nUnicode character names identify the characters more reliably than the character glyphs."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecma262/issues/comments/161137743","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/199#issuecomment-161137743","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecma262/issues/199","id":161137743,"user":{"login":"bterlson","id":11236,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/11236?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson","html_url":"https://github.com/bterlson","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-02T00:09:04Z","updated_at":"2015-12-02T00:09:04Z","body":"Removing all mentions of \"code unit X (NAME)\" would be a good regexp replace someone could do. One concern would be tough-to-read code units like HYPHEN-MINUS, but since we consider the HTML normative now (and printed copies non-normative), and the HTML actually has the code point we want in its source, I think this is fine. What do you think?"}}