{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gfredericks/test.chuck/issues/5","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gfredericks/test.chuck/issues/5/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gfredericks/test.chuck/issues/5/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gfredericks/test.chuck/issues/5/events","html_url":"https://github.com/gfredericks/test.chuck/issues/5","id":57679417,"number":5,"title":"Reported args for failure case shows functions instead of values when using for-all","user":{"login":"dparis","id":149485,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/149485?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dparis","html_url":"https://github.com/dparis","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dparis/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dparis/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dparis/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dparis/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dparis/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dparis/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dparis/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dparis/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dparis/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":8,"created_at":"2015-02-14T03:34:51Z","updated_at":"2015-02-15T16:26:11Z","closed_at":"2015-02-15T16:26:11Z","body":"When a test fails using the test.chuck `for-all` macro, the failure report data lists functions as the failing arguments. Here's a simple repro case and the resulting failure report:\r\n\r\n```clojure\r\n(test-check/quick-check 20\r\n (test-chuck-prop/for-all [x test-check-gen/pos-int] (< 0 x)))\r\n```\r\n\r\n```clojure\r\n{:result false\r\n :seed 1423884093065\r\n :failing-size 0\r\n :num-tests 1\r\n :fail [#<utils_test$eval18115$fn__18118$fn__18119 hunter.utils_test$eval18115$fn__18118$fn__18119@7ff7aa49>]\r\n :shrunk {:total-nodes-visited 0\r\n          :depth 0 \r\n          :result false\r\n          :smallest (#<utils_test$eval18115$fn__18118$fn__18119 hunter.utils_test$eval18115$fn__18118$fn__18119@7ff7aa49>)}}\r\n```\r\n\r\nI looked over the macro expansion, but I wasn't familiar enough with the test.check internals to notice anything obviously wrong. Hopefully it's a quick fix!"}}