{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sabnzbd/sabnzbd/issues/408","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sabnzbd/sabnzbd/issues/408/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sabnzbd/sabnzbd/issues/408/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sabnzbd/sabnzbd/issues/408/events","html_url":"https://github.com/sabnzbd/sabnzbd/issues/408","id":121008471,"number":408,"title":"Glitter layout needs tweaking before release","user":{"login":"Cpuroast","id":3321892,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3321892?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Cpuroast","html_url":"https://github.com/Cpuroast","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Cpuroast/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Cpuroast/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Cpuroast/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Cpuroast/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Cpuroast/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Cpuroast/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Cpuroast/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Cpuroast/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Cpuroast/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":26,"created_at":"2015-12-08T13:42:20Z","updated_at":"2015-12-26T19:42:34Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I find the glitter layout a bit too constrained.\r\n\r\nFor example you have this huge progress bar with tons of empty space where the category could be relocated to, right in the middle of it, instead of requiring a huge window to display.\r\n\r\nAlso, the job name should get prioritized over the progress bar in terms of screen real estate, meaning the progress bar should shrink to some extent to make space for the job name.\r\n\r\nI understand that it's a universal UI, so things are large for touch devices as well as mouse cursors.\r\nBut compared to plush(which obviously isn't really touch optimized), it's very inefficient as far as space usage goes, there must be a middle ground and I have a feeling it could be tweaked a bit to make it a bit less awkward on a non-touch device."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sabnzbd/sabnzbd/issues/comments/167356193","html_url":"https://github.com/sabnzbd/sabnzbd/issues/408#issuecomment-167356193","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sabnzbd/sabnzbd/issues/408","id":167356193,"user":{"login":"Safihre","id":5703454,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5703454?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Safihre","html_url":"https://github.com/Safihre","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Safihre/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Safihre/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Safihre/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Safihre/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Safihre/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Safihre/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Safihre/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Safihre/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Safihre/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-12-26T19:42:34Z","updated_at":"2015-12-26T19:42:34Z","body":"I also just found that when 'Download all PAR2' is turned on, the par2 is also put on this seperate list and in the queue. So the API ```get_files``` actually reports the files twice (status='active' and status='queued'):\r\n![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/5703454/12007700/d4eda602-ac10-11e5-8b73-60c678b61303.png)\r\n\r\nThis had the side effect that Glitter was confused since it only has the filename to go on as unique identifier of the Object, and so it would update the wrong files in the list. I fixed that behavior, but it still looks like there is more par2 then there actually is.\r\nI know this is a more exotic case, so probably is fine this way."}}