{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/233","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/233/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/233/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/233/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/233","id":97996838,"number":233,"title":"Consider adding unsigned int operations to Int32x4","user":{"login":"littledan","id":189835,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/189835?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan","html_url":"https://github.com/littledan","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2015-07-29T18:11:15Z","updated_at":"2015-07-31T21:01:30Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Waldemar Horwat from TC39 noted that it is not orthogonal to have unsigned operations (like unsignedExtractLane) implemented only on Int16x8 and Int8x16, and not Int32x4. He supported adding these operations to Int32x4. He was OK with different operations being supported on int vs float (like max), on the other hand."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/comments/126811226","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/233#issuecomment-126811226","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/233","id":126811226,"user":{"login":"littledan","id":189835,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/189835?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan","html_url":"https://github.com/littledan","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-07-31T21:01:29Z","updated_at":"2015-07-31T21:01:29Z","body":"The unsigned type discussion is happening at #191. This thread is about whether unsigned ops should be just on int16x8 and int8x16 or also int32x4.\r\n\r\nWhich platforms are missing accelerated uint32 ops? My understanding was that at least Intel supported them."}}