{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/acardona/CATMAID/issues/796","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/acardona/CATMAID/issues/796/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/acardona/CATMAID/issues/796/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/acardona/CATMAID/issues/796/events","html_url":"https://github.com/acardona/CATMAID/issues/796","id":46767440,"number":796,"title":"Review widget: support constraining the neuron/arbor under review","user":{"login":"tomka","id":112226,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/112226?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomka","html_url":"https://github.com/tomka","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomka/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomka/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomka/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomka/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomka/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomka/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomka/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomka/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tomka/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/acardona/CATMAID/labels/difficulty:%20low","name":"difficulty: low","color":"D58D6D"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/acardona/CATMAID/labels/type:%20enhancement","name":"type: enhancement","color":"0b02e1"}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2014-10-24T18:15:01Z","updated_at":"2015-03-13T14:18:22Z","closed_at":"2015-03-13T14:18:22Z","body":"It would be nice to be able to constrain the neuron under review in such a way that one can make it display only the segments that are downstream the active node. This way one could have a much more targeted review.\r\n\r\nTo do this, `Arbor.js` and its partitioning functions will be helpful."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/acardona/CATMAID/issues/comments/78990859","html_url":"https://github.com/acardona/CATMAID/issues/796#issuecomment-78990859","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/acardona/CATMAID/issues/796","id":78990859,"user":{"login":"aschampion","id":460206,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/460206?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschampion","html_url":"https://github.com/aschampion","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschampion/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschampion/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschampion/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschampion/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschampion/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschampion/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschampion/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschampion/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschampion/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-03-13T14:18:22Z","updated_at":"2015-03-13T14:18:22Z","body":"The remaining part of this issue would be to segment the arbor on the client instead of the backend. However, this would require a significant refactoring of the backend review API, and would impact other widgets. It's not clear this is beneficial overall, so for now this ticket is closed because the original functionality is fulfilled."}}