{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lttng/lttng-tools/issues/25","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lttng/lttng-tools/issues/25/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lttng/lttng-tools/issues/25/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lttng/lttng-tools/issues/25/events","html_url":"https://github.com/lttng/lttng-tools/pull/25","id":103186723,"number":25,"title":"Fix event exclusion names","user":{"login":"eepp","id":1816705,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1816705?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp","html_url":"https://github.com/eepp","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-08-26T06:30:33Z","updated_at":"2015-08-26T18:21:10Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lttng/lttng-tools/pulls/25","html_url":"https://github.com/lttng/lttng-tools/pull/25","diff_url":"https://github.com/lttng/lttng-tools/pull/25.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/lttng/lttng-tools/pull/25.patch"},"body":"Fix and implement different things related to event exclusion names.\r\n\r\nBoth validation and match algorithms are O(n²) in relation to the number of exclusion names, but this should not cause noticeable performance issues in this context."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lttng/lttng-tools/issues/comments/135129774","html_url":"https://github.com/lttng/lttng-tools/pull/25#issuecomment-135129774","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lttng/lttng-tools/issues/25","id":135129774,"user":{"login":"eepp","id":1816705,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1816705?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp","html_url":"https://github.com/eepp","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eepp/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-08-26T18:21:10Z","updated_at":"2015-08-26T18:21:10Z","body":"> Why memcmp() rather than strcmp() here?\r\n\r\nI guess `strcmp()` would also work. I used `memcmp()` because it was used previously, comparing the whole `names` block at once."}}