{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/karawoo/icetest/issues/20","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/karawoo/icetest/issues/20/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/karawoo/icetest/issues/20/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/karawoo/icetest/issues/20/events","html_url":"https://github.com/karawoo/icetest/issues/20","id":56447550,"number":20,"title":"Check for missing data in photicdepth","user":{"login":"karawoo","id":4452678,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4452678?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/karawoo","html_url":"https://github.com/karawoo","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karawoo/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karawoo/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karawoo/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karawoo/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karawoo/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karawoo/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karawoo/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karawoo/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karawoo/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/karawoo/icetest/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2015-02-03T22:25:44Z","updated_at":"2015-02-03T22:25:44Z","closed_at":null,"body":"...and maybe also `sampledepth`?\r\n\r\nIt is not necessarily a problem if these fields have missing data, but we may want to check in with data providers to make sure that it's not an oversight. I can imagine scenarios where there was no light penetration under thick/snow-covered ice and NA might get reported when we really want 0. I think we at least want to be aware if there are NAs in these fields."}}