{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jjg/jsfs/issues/27","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jjg/jsfs/issues/27/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jjg/jsfs/issues/27/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jjg/jsfs/issues/27/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jjg/jsfs/issues/27","id":58080082,"number":27,"title":"Reconsider object contents in indexes","user":{"login":"jjg","id":122858,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/122858?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg","html_url":"https://github.com/jjg","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jjg/jsfs/milestones/1","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jjg/jsfs/milestones/1/labels","id":982214,"number":1,"title":"Merge object-warehouse","description":"Steps required to merge object-warehouse functionality into JSFS","creator":{"login":"jjg","id":122858,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/122858?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg","html_url":"https://github.com/jjg","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"open_issues":4,"closed_issues":3,"state":"open","created_at":"2015-02-17T01:48:28Z","updated_at":"2015-02-18T15:13:39Z","due_on":null,"closed_at":null},"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-02-18T15:13:39Z","updated_at":"2015-02-18T15:18:26Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Currently indexes return an array of the contents of the objects stored at the specified url, however if these contents are large binary files this may not be useful.\r\n\r\nDo some testing to see if this is really an issue, but if it is figure out a logical way to provide indexes that make sense for any type of stored object."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jjg/jsfs/issues/comments/74880949","html_url":"https://github.com/jjg/jsfs/issues/27#issuecomment-74880949","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jjg/jsfs/issues/27","id":74880949,"user":{"login":"jjg","id":122858,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/122858?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg","html_url":"https://github.com/jjg","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jjg/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-02-18T15:18:26Z","updated_at":"2015-02-18T15:18:26Z","body":"Upon further inspection it looks like I might have already solved this, but test regardless to confirm."}}