{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mnot/I-D/issues/140","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mnot/I-D/issues/140/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mnot/I-D/issues/140/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mnot/I-D/issues/140/events","html_url":"https://github.com/mnot/I-D/issues/140","id":111728374,"number":140,"title":"Stable URIs for registered relation types","user":{"login":"mnot","id":74384,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/74384?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot","html_url":"https://github.com/mnot","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mnot/I-D/labels/rfc5988bis","name":"rfc5988bis","color":"0052cc"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":24,"created_at":"2015-10-15T23:32:57Z","updated_at":"2015-10-29T08:08:09Z","closed_at":null,"body":"From #39. We need a convention for registered relation types to be assigned URIs, so that applications (such as RDF) can refer to them.\r\n\r\nFrom previous discussion: \r\n\r\nI think the resolution is a modification of what I suggested way above (incorporating feedback from @dret). In \"Registered Relation Types\", add:\r\n\r\n> Applications that wish to refer to registered relation types with a URI [RFC3986] MAY do so by prepending them with \"http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/\". Note that the resulting strings are not considered equivalent to the registered relation types by many processors, and SHOULD NOT be serialised unless the application using link relations specifically allows them.\r\n\r\n(with possible adjustments to the prefix depending on decisions below)"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mnot/I-D/issues/comments/152107980","html_url":"https://github.com/mnot/I-D/issues/140#issuecomment-152107980","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mnot/I-D/issues/140","id":152107980,"user":{"login":"mnot","id":74384,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/74384?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot","html_url":"https://github.com/mnot","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mnot/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-10-29T08:08:09Z","updated_at":"2015-10-29T08:08:09Z","body":"@asbjornu sounds reasonable, although some people will undoubtedly copy the resulting `#` URL and use it to identify :(\r\n\r\nThe other thing we could do is auto-generate a file for each relation. I'm not thrilled with that, though."}}