{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ds4se/chapters/issues/52","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ds4se/chapters/issues/52/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ds4se/chapters/issues/52/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ds4se/chapters/issues/52/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ds4se/chapters/issues/52","id":111765181,"number":52,"title":"./meinagappan/Diversity_in_SE_Research.md","user":{"login":"timm","id":29195,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/29195?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/timm","html_url":"https://github.com/timm","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timm/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timm/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timm/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timm/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timm/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timm/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timm/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timm/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timm/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-10-16T05:54:48Z","updated_at":"2015-11-09T17:59:40Z","closed_at":null,"body":"After review, relabel to 'reviewTwo'. After second review, relabel to 'EditorsComment'."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ds4se/chapters/issues/comments/155140747","html_url":"https://github.com/ds4se/chapters/issues/52#issuecomment-155140747","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ds4se/chapters/issues/52","id":155140747,"user":{"login":"jacekczerwonka","id":9115223,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9115223?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacekczerwonka","html_url":"https://github.com/jacekczerwonka","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacekczerwonka/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacekczerwonka/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacekczerwonka/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacekczerwonka/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacekczerwonka/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacekczerwonka/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacekczerwonka/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacekczerwonka/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacekczerwonka/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-11-09T17:59:40Z","updated_at":"2015-11-09T17:59:40Z","body":"An important topic and a solid read. Could really use an editorial pass smoothing the language, making the text formatting consistent and fixing typos. I'm suggesting some of the necessary changes below.\r\n\r\n* \"evaluate the hypothesis\" makes it sound like there is one specific hypothesis, Chnage to \"evaluate hypotheses\"?\r\n* Use plural of hypothesis in the Introduction.\r\n* \"to study a hypothesis about distributed\" -> \"to study distributed\".\r\n* Capitalize \"dbms\".\r\n* \"it helps us to see the\" -> \"help illustrate\".\r\n* Why is \"Diversity and Representativeness\" capitalized?\r\n* Can diversity and representativeness and their relationship be emphasised with an appropriate graphic? This would enliven the text considerably.\r\n* \"is comprise by\" -> \"is comprised of\".\r\n* \"a diverse sample would be 50X and 50Y. On the other hand, a representative sample would be 40X and 10Y\" -> \"50X and 50Y would be considered a diverse sample, and 40X and 10Y a representative sample\".\r\n* \"ap- plications\" -> \"applications\", \"Ex- amples\" -> \"Examples\" -- a few more similar problems in the text.\r\n* Capitalize \"Java\".\r\n* Define \"LOC\" (or spell it out) before using.\r\n* Explain the \"coverage(P)\" forumla is layman's terms as well.\r\n* Try to avoid \"her/his\" if possible i.e. \"his/her research topic\" -> \"the research topic\".\r\n* \"important discuss\" -> \"important to discuss\".\r\n* \"What projects, is the\" -> \"What projects is the\".\r\n* \"Takingideasfromdiversity,identifytheneighborhoods(subgroups)ofallprojects\" ???\r\n* \"their neighborhood will overlap each other\" -> \"their neighborhoods will overlap\".\r\n* Can there be a graphic workflow depicting the steps of the \"What can we do about it chapter?\" A nice picture of this key point of the article would make the text even more accessible.\r\n* \"This result also counters a common criticism of some software engineering research\" -- this statement is very strong.  It makes it sound like the other 5,015 projects were not important for the coverage. Clearly the top 15 projects can't be representative if the \"size in LOC\" is one of the criteria. Also, the statement assumes that the chosen coverage criteria are always sufficient for any research study. Consider making it clearer.\r\n* Missing period at the end of the \"Evaluating the Sample Selection Technique\" chapter.\r\n* Chapter titles not capitalized consistently.\r\n* \"unique projects was found\" -> \"unique projects were found\".\r\n* \"studies with low coverage does not\" -> \"studies with low coverage do not\".\r\n* Why is \"Coverage\" capitalized?\r\n* \"it is common practice \" -> \"it is a common practice \"."}}