{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/thoughtbot/hound/issues/748","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/thoughtbot/hound/issues/748/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/thoughtbot/hound/issues/748/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/thoughtbot/hound/issues/748/events","html_url":"https://github.com/thoughtbot/hound/pull/748","id":66321591,"number":748,"title":"Lint `coffee.erb`","user":{"login":"teoljungberg","id":810650,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/810650?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/teoljungberg","html_url":"https://github.com/teoljungberg","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teoljungberg/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teoljungberg/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teoljungberg/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teoljungberg/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teoljungberg/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teoljungberg/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teoljungberg/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teoljungberg/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teoljungberg/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2015-04-04T13:40:28Z","updated_at":"2015-04-14T16:33:54Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/thoughtbot/hound/pulls/748","html_url":"https://github.com/thoughtbot/hound/pull/748","diff_url":"https://github.com/thoughtbot/hound/pull/748.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/thoughtbot/hound/pull/748.patch"},"body":"To avoid eval-ing `erb` tags, due to security reasons, we could instead\nreplace it the tag with a dummy value. I picked an emtpy string since\nthat seemed the easier way of solving it.\n\nThoughts?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/thoughtbot/hound/issues/comments/92961389","html_url":"https://github.com/thoughtbot/hound/pull/748#issuecomment-92961389","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/thoughtbot/hound/issues/748","id":92961389,"user":{"login":"thorncp","id":72176,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/72176?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/thorncp","html_url":"https://github.com/thorncp","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thorncp/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thorncp/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thorncp/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thorncp/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thorncp/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thorncp/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thorncp/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thorncp/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thorncp/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2015-04-14T16:33:54Z","updated_at":"2015-04-14T16:33:54Z","body":"The only thing I can think of is the possibility of substituting `123` leaving the content in a state that causes the linter to report a false violation. Does that seem likely? I can't think of a situation like that offhand."}}