Speaker 1: Complete actions to expand municipal services and territory for financing district at Alameda Landing and Levy of corresponding special tax community facility to District 13 Dash to Alameda Landing Municipal Services District. You'll do so by conducting public hearings and adopting for resolutions.
Speaker 0: So open. Do we have a presentation?
Speaker 1: Debbie's coming.
Speaker 2: So good evening once again, a short staff report. So on February 4th, 2014, the City Council established a community facilities district for Alameda Landing Phase one to fund maintenance of public infrastructure and other municipal services. Catullus has now requested that the city extend the existing CFD to include the Phase two property, which is primarily the property north of Mitchell. And there's a little piece of the property north of Mitchell that's actually part of phase one. But we're talking about approximately 40 acres north of Mitchell Street, which is the phase two property. So they would like to increase expand the CFD to include phase two property and the DDA. The disposition and development agreement that that we have with Catullus requires that the city cooperate with the establishment of a CFD if requested by the developer. Tonight's public hearings have been set to consider adding eligible municipal services that can be funded and to consider adding the Phase two property to the existing CFD by annexing Phase two property and adding additional services. The cost of maintaining the future waterfront park and additional Phase two public infrastructure can be covered by the special taxes to be collected from the resident, the property owners in the district. So that's essentially what the annexation and the addition of of eligible services does. It expands the size of the existing CFD and expands the eligible services that can be maintained via the special taxes. So I do have Paul Kimmage, who is our bond counsel here this evening. If there are any technical questions otherwise, I would recommend that the mayor open the public hearing and commence the proceedings.
Speaker 0: Vice Mayor.
Speaker 9: I have a request because there are two agenda items in the second. One is completely tied to the first and my right. Well, you can execute the first without the second.
Speaker 2: So you could the first. This this community facility, there are two existing community facilities districts. They were both adopted, one in January of 2014, one in February of 2014. This one the item. First up, CFD 13, dash two. It has to do with the municipal services and the funding of the municipal services, the cost of maintaining the backbone infrastructure. The second item has to do with the authority to issue bond bonded indebtedness to reimburse Catalist for the cost of the construction of the public improvements. So they are two separate community facilities districts there. Both of them work in the sense that both of them assess a special tax on the property owners in the districts. One to fund the municipal services. The other to fund the bond. The debt service on the bonds.
Speaker 9: And that requires an election.
Speaker 2: Both of them require an election so that that's what those are. Sure.
Speaker 9: Before we start the discussion that everybody.
Speaker 2: Knows they both require an election. And those are the proceedings that that will commence this evening is the election involving the property owners.
Speaker 0: Member de SA.
Speaker 7: So the question that I have has to do with the second item specifically. The item after this agenda specifically calls out. Moving the or in it from where it is now to here without without specifying a cost that it would be one of the items for which things could be covered. But there is no cost associated with with the $55 million or so and bonds, $26 million of which is for the Fort Worth alterations. The question I have is. While we have not vetted the merits or demerits of moving the Hornet from one part of Alameda point to another, it might be a good idea. The question I have is in moving forward with the first thing or even the second one, can that happen as an item that's a standalone that that. That all of this isn't predicated somehow that we have to we have to move the Hornet. Rather, it's predicated on the fact that, you know, we whether or not the Hornets, they are, we want to make these kind of changes to the the wharf area.
Speaker 2: Right. So the latter characterization is the accurate one. All of the work that's being proposed is predicated on the need to stabilize the existing wharf and to put in the park improvements. And it is not tied to the to the relocation of the Hornet.
Speaker 7: Thank you.
Speaker 0: Any other council questions? Right. All right. This is now the time and place where the public hearing in the City Council's proceedings for changes to community facilities. District Number 13 dash to the hearing is to allow public comment regarding additional municipal services to be financed by the CFD. Before I formally open the public hearing, are there any owners of property and CFD 13 Dash two or registered voters who reside in the Alameda Landing area who wish to file a written protest against the proposed changes to CFD 13 Dash two. If so, they must be filed with the city clerk now. Seen on the public hearing is now officially open. Does anyone in the audience wish to make any comments on this matter?
Speaker 1: We have no public speakers.
Speaker 0: I will now close the public hearing counsel discussion. During a council discussion. S Vice mayor, can.
Speaker 9: We have staff summarize the residential component of this transfer so that the public knows when their land is an expert, what zoning it carries and what the unit load is?
Speaker 2: To the Alameda landing. Phase two property is currently zoned a mixed PD. So it's a mixed use plan development. It is approximately 40 acres and a portion of that 40 acres, ten acres has a multi-family overlay in addition to the mixed PD zoning. Alameda Landing. Catullus is currently working on their master planning for phase two, and they don't have a completed proposal, land use proposal at this time. They will be working with city staff on that entitlement process as it moves forward. I was mentioned in the staff report that pursuant to the DDA, Catullus has to commence an initial phase land take down on the phase two property by December 31st of 2017, which is why they're working to put the pieces in place and are beginning their pre-development process. So they there is not a set there is not a set land plan yet, but they do have the ability to take advantage of the multifamily overlay on ten acres of that property and.
Speaker 9: The approximate number of units just by the zoning.
Speaker 2: As well. Ten acres, 30 acres to the unit is 300 units.
Speaker 0: So I have a question. Does this decision have does this impact the zoning?
Speaker 2: Not at all.
Speaker 0: Any other comments?
Speaker 9: I just have a comment because.
Speaker 0: I swear I.
Speaker 9: Was looking at the housing element and I didn't see this as part of our land. Listen, the 1523 background report. I didn't see it as part of the land inventory and I also didn't see it discussed. LME two point was discussed as being outside the land inventory. But this wasn't is is there a reason why? Is it before is it before the plan or was it an unknown at the time or I assume that the zoning was there.
Speaker 2: It's in the 2007, 2015 housing element, and I believe it's on a tape. I believe it's number six. So it's state 16 on the table.
Speaker 9: Is there a reason it disappeared from the current housing element? It's not even mentioned.
Speaker 2: And I. I don't I believe that it's just it's been you know, it was it was part of the the package initial housing element 27 to 2015. And so it's just carried over as one of the properties with the multifamily overlay designation was done as part of the 2007 2015 housing element.
Speaker 9: And that overlay was placed on it in 2012. Mm hmm. Thank you.
Speaker 5: You're welcome.
Speaker 0: Any other council questions? Comments?
Speaker 2: And.
Speaker 0: Q So then it's my understanding at this time, and I asked the city clerk to open the ballots of the owners of land in CFD 13, Dash two four. And if you will.
Speaker 1: Yes, really quickly, the first action is for the council to adopt the resolution calling the election.
Speaker 0: All right. So then do we have a motion for that?
Speaker 1: The first. Yeah.
Speaker 6: Yes, I will. Oh, sorry. Wrong way.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Mm hmm. Okay.
Speaker 6: All right. So I move. Adoption of the resolution calling special election regarding alteration of the municipal services to be financed by community facilities. District number 13 Dash to Alameda Landing Municipal Services District.
Speaker 0: We have a second.
Speaker 7: Second.
Speaker 0: Although some favor.
Speaker 5: I.
Speaker 0: Unanimously passes and now at this time I asked the city clerk to open the ballots of the owners of land in CFD 13, dash two and announce the results of the election. We will pause while she opens the ballot.
Speaker 6: And by the way, how many owners are we? Are we talking about five?
Speaker 1: Five? This one has four. All right. Oh, okay.
Speaker 6: Sorry.
Speaker 3: Mm hmm.
Speaker 1: You know what I mean? I need an assist. No, no. They still do well.
Speaker 5: They won't.
Speaker 1: Of. There is 534, five, six, three, six. They'll have different number of votes each time to just give me.
Speaker 6: Yeah, this party. Do you want it? Just for a little filler? So land owners, property owners have a different amount of votes depending on the amount of acreage they own. Is that correct? I'm just remembering this. When our the last council voted on this last year. I know I'm putting you on the spot, but generally speaking.
Speaker 2: That the the 51% yes vote has to be is based on the percentage as opposed to one one person, one vote, its percentage acreage relative ratio of the ownership. So total so that if you if you own 20% of the property, then your vote is weighted, 20% of you own 60%, it's weighted 60%. And there has to be a 51% affirmative buy percentage of of acreage of land ownership. If that's clear.
Speaker 6: News here is.
Speaker 2: That two thirds, not 50%. You need two thirds. Affirmative.
Speaker 6: Okay. Thank you, Miss Potter.
Speaker 5: Oh.
Speaker 1: And three for this one. Too for this.
Speaker 5: One. Oh.
Speaker 1: Okay. Got it. Let me juggle my own lives. Oh, one more. It was hiding there. Wait. Oh, I think I got it. Is society. You guys want to? I. The thing is that.
Speaker 0: We're going to take a recess.
Speaker 6: Thank you. Thank you.
Speaker 1: I think I have it now. Yeah. Yes, I do have it.
Speaker 2: Oh.
Speaker 1: Okay. So the votes for this one are 12, 11, ten and 14 in favor. You got it. Okay. So do you want to tell us about that resume? So they're all in favor and it passes all in favor.
Speaker 0: The results of the election being that all of the votes are in favor of allowing 5013 dash to the finance additional services. You may now proceed with the final actions for the changes to CAFTA 13. Dash two Do we have a motion to adopt the next part.
Speaker 1: Which is the resolution declaring the results?
Speaker 9: No.
Speaker 6: Moved a second. The resolution declaring results of the special election regarding the municipal services.
Speaker 0: All those in favor.
Speaker 5: I.
Speaker 0: Passes unanimously. Well, now open the second public hearing regarding the annexation of property to CFD 13 Dash two. This is now the time and place for the public hearing and this city council's proceedings for the annexation of property to community facilities, District Number 13, Dash two and the levy of special taxes in the area to be annexed to the district. For I formally open the public hearing. Are there any owners of property in CFD 13, dash two or in the area to be annexed to CFD 13? Dash two are registered voters who reside in the Alameda Landing area who wish to file a written protest against the annexation of land to CFD 13 Dash two . If so. They must be filed with the city clerk now. Seeing no protests. A public hearing is now officially re-opened. Does anyone in the audience wish to make any comments on this matter? I will now close the public hearing. Is there council discussion? CNN. We will now proceed with is there a motion to adopt this resolution?
Speaker 6: And this is the resolution.
Speaker 0: Of annexation.
Speaker 1: Taxation. Okay.
Speaker 6: So. Okay. I want to hand me the script. This is very scripted. We have to say the exact words so.
Speaker 2: Far this.
Speaker 6: Year. Okay. So I move that the council adopt the resolution of annexation of territory to the city of Alameda Community Facilities District Number 13 dash to Alameda Landing Municipal Services District authorizing the levy of a special tax therein and submitting levy of special tax to qualified electors.
Speaker 0: Is there a second? All those in favor.
Speaker 5: I.
Speaker 0: Motion unanimously passes. Thank you. At this time, I asked the city clerk to open the ballots of the owners of land in the area to be annexed to CFD 13, dash two and announce the results of the election. We will pause for that.
Speaker 1: We received two ballots for this one. Both are in favor. One is 48 votes. One is two votes. So that's 50 votes in favor.
Speaker 0: The results of the election being that all of the votes are in favor of the annexation of land to CFD 13 dash two women now proceed with the final actions for the annexation of property to CFD 13 Dash two. We have a motion to adopt a resolution declaring results of special annexation, election determining validity, validity of prior proceedings and directing recording of amendment to notice of special tax lien. Alameda Landing Municipal Services District. We have a second.
Speaker 8: Second.
Speaker 0: All those in favor. My motion unanimously passes. Thank you. And that was the end of that idea. Now we're going to proceed with six E.
Speaker 1: 60 is. Or sorry if a t e is clean actions to expand public improvements in territory for financing district add Alameda Landing and levy of corresponding special tax community facility District 13 Dash one Alameda Landing Public Improvements. You'll do so by conducting public hearings to adopt resolutions and introduce an ordinance amending and restating ordinance levying special taxes within the City of Alameda Community Facilities District 13. Dash one. Alameda Landing Public Improvements.
Speaker 0: As Potter.
Speaker 2: Okay. Once again, briefly. So this CFD was established on January 7th of 2014 and it was established for Alameda Planning Phase one to fund public facilities constructed by Catullus. This CFD allows bonds in an amount not to exceed $20 million to be issued to fund the public improvements. And they will be repaid. The bonds will be repaid by a special tax assessment on property owners within the district. Catullus has now requested that the city extend the existing CFD to include the Phase two property. Tonight's public hearings have been set to consider increasing the bonding capacity from 20 million to $40 million, adding eligible public improvements to be financed and to consider adding the additional phase two property to the existing CFD annex in the Phase two land. Adding public services to be financed and raising the bond limit, Catullus will be able to finance the necessary work to stabilize the existing wharf, to build the public waterfront park, complete Mitchell Street to the project boundaries
Summary Title:  Complete Actions to Expand Municipal Services and Territory for Financing District at Alameda Landing and Levy of Corresponding Special Tax - Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 13-2 (Alameda Landing Municipal Services District)

Public Hearing to Consider the Expansion of Municipal Services by Adoption of Resolution Calling Special Election Regarding Alteration of the Municipal Services to be Financed by Community Facilities District No. 13-2 (Alameda Landing Municipal Services District); Conducting Special Election; and Adoption of Resolution Declaring Results of Special Election in Community Facilities District No. 13-2 (Alameda Landing Municipal Services District), Determining that the Alteration of Municipal Services to be Financed by the District are Lawfully Authorized, and Directing Recording of an Amendment to Notice of Special Tax Lien; and  

Public Hearing to Consider the Expansion of Territory by Adoption of Resolution of Annexation of Territory to the City of Alameda Community Facilities District No. 13-2 (Alameda Landing Municipal Services Distr