Speaker 0: Thank you, Madam Clerk. Okay, I see a distinguished list of staff and consultants in front of me. Just let me know who is going to present this item.
Speaker 4: Lisa Fitz is going to present this item.
Speaker 0: Thanks, Ms.. Maxwell. I see your name.
Speaker 4: This shit. I'm here.
Speaker 0: Here you are. And now I see all of you. Well, at least from the shoulders that. Welcome. Happy New Year. And please, the floor is yours.
Speaker 4: Thank you. Madam Mayor, council members and staff. Every year, the successor agency to the Community Improvement Commission is required to prepare the ROPS, which stands for a recognized obligation payment schedule. The ROPS includes the cost of managing the enforceable obligations of the former Community Improvement Commission and includes project and staff costs. There are five outstanding obligations boundary repayment Alameda Landing Disposition and Development Agreement, the operating subsidy for Independence Plaza, the Boat Works Settlement Agreement, and the Guidant Judgment Settlement Agreement and School District Pass through agreement. In the packet. There are two exhibits that list the remaining obligations and anticipated payments for the upcoming fiscal year. It should be noted that Exhibit one shows a lower administrative cost, while Exhibit two shows 160,000. Exhibit two contains the correct number. And that concludes my presentation.
Speaker 0: Thank you. So, Counsel, do we have any. Any questions? Clarifying questions about the staff report. CNN. Madam Clerk, do we have any public comment on this item?
Speaker 2: We do not.
Speaker 0: Okay. Would anyone like that? Well, I just want to say a little bit about this item, because I think it's pretty exciting. Well, I mean, repayment of bonds or whatever they are. But this this recommendation includes providing approximately $2.032 million in redevelopment property tax trust funds to be allocated to Rose Fields Village, which is, I want to say, our oldest housing authority property. But now it is under construction being rebuilt and actually made into more units because there were some really big units, actually misfits. Why don't you tell us a little bit about that and tell us the connection to a USD two, if you would?
Speaker 4: Sure. Rose Field Village, like you said, is owned by the Housing Authority. It contains modular built units that have been demolished and currently construction is ongoing at the site. The construction has will result in a total of 92 units on the site. Some of the existing stick built buildings will remain and be rehabbed and then but in total, we will have a larger, denser building on the property there. And then in terms of the second part of your question, the relationship to the school district, the housing authority has a an Emmylou with the school district and the school district . Let me back up. The school district receives Rob some money. And that money may be used for the development of housing for school district employees. Obviously, the housing authority has expertize in affordable housing development. They have entered into an Emmylou with the school district, and the housing authority builds affordable housing, and they will either set aside or provide a preference to school district employees in exchange for the funds that are provided by the school district to help build the affordable housing.
Speaker 0: And if I recall correctly, it's also school district employees who make of whose income qualifies for the affordable housing.
Speaker 4: Yes, they must be low income. Thank you for that clarification, Ray.
Speaker 0: So Council, I think Councilmember Jason, do I see your hand go up?
Speaker 1: Well, I was just going to make a quick comment and if if if it's okay to make a motion to accept staff recommendation. The quick comment is two. One is I recall many years ago former assistant city manager Rob Wunder talking so excitedly about the day that he helped bring the modular units to where they are over there on Eagle Avenue. And and I'm sure he would be just as excited today about the major modernization that we're doing over there and the expansion project as well. And the second thing I just want to say is, you know, I think this is a great partnership with the school district. And so I'm glad to see that that we're we're able to continue where we can when it comes to providing housing for for employees over at a USDA.
Speaker 0: Thank you. So you're making a motion.
Speaker 1: To make motion to a priestess recommendation.
Speaker 0: Great. And do I have a second? A vice mayor validates your hand.
Speaker 4: Go second.
Speaker 0: Okay. Any further council discussion thing then? May we have a roll call vote, please?
Speaker 2: Councilmember Jason Knox White.
Speaker 3: Hi.
Speaker 2: Spencer. I think you're muted.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 2: I think Villa.
Speaker 4: High may.
Speaker 2: Or as the Ashcroft high carries by five eyes.
Speaker 0: Perfect. Thank you. Okay. With that, that was our last agenda item. I now adjourn this special meeting of the city council and successor agency to the Community Improvement Commission, and I will call to order the regular city council meeting. Roll Call, Madam Clerk.
Speaker 2: Roll Call has been voted five present.
Speaker 0: Thank you. Thank you, staff for your presentations. That was great and happy New Year. Okay. And do we have any agenda changes for this evening's meeting? Councilmember de.
Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Joint City Council/SACIC Resolution Approving the Development List of Affordable Housing Projects and Funding Request for Such Projects as Requested by the Alameda Unified School District (AUSD); and 
Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Submit the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) and Administrative Budget for the Period from July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 to the Countywide Oversight Board.  (Community Development 207)