Speaker 0: Okay, great. We're going to go ahead now take up item ten. Request from one of the from one of the council members who will take up item ten and then get back to the agenda.
Speaker 1: Report from the city manager recommendation to receive a report on the Thailand's capital budget and approve the five year capital plan and prioritization of projects districts two and three.
Speaker 3: Assistant City Manager Tom Modica.
Speaker 6: Mr. Mayor, members of the city council back in December, we actually back when the budget was adopted, the adopted budget was based on a set price of oil for funding tidelands projects. These are projects that are along the beaches area and they're primarily funded through oil revenue. At the time of the budget adoption, oil was slightly below $100 a barrel and the and the projections were really based on $100 a barrel. As we know, the price of oil has dropped significantly due to global events over the last several months. In December, we brought a report to the mayor and city council talking about the strategy for how to adopt, how to adapt to that drop in. The council asked us to put together a prioritization of process projects. Given that there's not as much funding as we had once expected. To put it in perspective, there is about 230 plus million dollars where the projects over the next five years and need and the city's identified approximately $95 million in funds available to fund those needs. In January, we were back in front of the city council where the council adopted some criteria to help us help staff prioritize those projects and bring you back a recommended list of projects based on your criteria. So we have gone through that process. We've also been updating the projects to make sure that they're reflective of current costs, that they include things like project labor agreement and administration, that they include things like cost escalation, if the scope is changed or if there's projects that that needed additional funding to be completed. The 95 million is available for you into full review in your packet today. It is attachment C. We have recommended a series of projects based on those criteria and been working very closely with council members and Vice Mayor Lowenthal and Councilmember Price as those are the two areas that are primarily affected. We're available to answer questions and talk about the specific projects and or any other questions about the methodology. I will add that we do hope that oil revenues will come back and as they come back, we'll be going through additional prioritization processes. You know, oil is very material. It it may go up. It may go down. So we're prepared to to be to be flexible. And as additional oil moneys come in, we can go through another prioritization process. And with that, we're available to answer questions.
Speaker 0: Thank you, Mr. Modica. I'm going to turn this over. There's been a motion and a second, so I'm gonna turn this over to Vice Mayor Lowenthal and then Councilwoman Price. Vice Mayor.
Speaker 4: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I wanted to thank staff, first and foremost, for the amount of work that they've put into this, not just during this time period, but really. Throughout the years, regardless of where we are in our budget cycle. Tidelands because of ongoing projects, ongoing interests and needs and unfunded needs, it's it's always a work in progress. So I do want to thank your staff, Mr. City Manager Tom Modica, and the staff that's seated behind you, Rachel, as well as Mr. Lopez. And I want to thank the community. We've heard a lot from residents and interested parties and stakeholders and businesses about this process. And I appreciate the very diligence and care that each of you provide along with the city staff. And the city staff really took a lot of effort to into developing criteria for the Tidelands and evaluating each project against those criteria. And then the criteria that this this Council has supported and helped help develop the input from residents is tremendously meaningful all the way to just I want to say a few minutes ago, we continue to get notes from residents who are interested in the projects, whether they live along the Tidelands or not. There's an understanding that the projects along the Tidelands are are of citywide benefit and citywide interest. These projects in this area, particularly ocean shoreline, the bike connection and improvements to concession stands in Alameda speech. We've heard a lot from residents, especially in the second district. I'm supportive of the list of projects and would urge my colleagues to support staff's good work and their recommendations that there are recommendations as well. I do, however, have one amendment to add to the list, and this comes in consultation with Councilmember Price, the city manager, as well as the mayor. I'd like to allocate $1.3 million to the Aquarium of the Pacific to be the city matched to the capital campaign for fiscal year 15, with funds from the following areas $250,000 from any funds available at the end of the year from closed out construction projects, item two would be $250,000 from critical infrastructure funding to be paid back when funds are again available. Item three is $400,000 from the Marina Vista Special Events bathroom, with funds to be paid back for projects in the same area, item four is $400,000 from the Cherry Beach Playground Capital funds to be paid back when funds are again available. All funds diverted would have first priority for repayment when new dollars become available. Any future allocation for the Aquarium of the Pacific would be on a case by case basis and reviewed annually against funds available and outstanding needs. And I wanted to make very clear that in coming up with the various parcels that make up $1.3 million, no project is is being delayed or denied that we were able to see an opportunity to take funding at this time because those projects are not starting right away. But our commitment is still to continue those projects and they will be on track and we have staff's commitment as well. And that's the motion I'd like to make, Mr. Mayor.
Speaker 0: Great. And I know that the second with Councilwoman Price, I might turn this over to Councilwoman Price.
Speaker 5: Thank you. And I want to thank the vice mayor for articulating that amendment so accurately and with the with the intent that we all have had as a team in terms of supporting the various projects that are on the list. So thank you, Vice Mayor. I do want, just for clarification, the $400,000 that was that was going to be coming from the Marina Vista bathroom. Just to be clear, we have two bathrooms in Marina Vista Park that we're hoping to have rebuilt. This one is actually two and which is closest to Marine Stadium, which is actually in the path of what where the open channel would go. So this is probably a bathroom that we wouldn't rebuild, at least not its current location anyway. And it's my understanding that staff has agreed to take the remaining 230 something thousand that was allocated for this project and move that over to M.V. one, which is the bathroom that's in Marina Vista Park, to either create two separate bathrooms or a larger bathroom in order to be able to service our residents in a way that's consistent with the open channel plan. Is that staff's understanding as well?
Speaker 6: Yes, that's.
Speaker 5: Correct. Thank you. I do have a couple of questions and and some points I want to make. I want to start with the pool and I want to be you know, I know there's going to be here. There's going to be people here to make public comment. And I'm really looking forward to hearing their their comments. And I want to just in advance take a moment to thank Lucie Johnson, who's a resident of the Fifth and really a champion for the pool. She's really been, you know, fighting the battle for the pool. And there have been times when Lucy and I have gotten into it on things. And, you know, she says it like it is. And we we we hammer it out and sometimes we agree to disagree. But there are some really great points that she's raised, and there are a few things that I just want to make clear as we go forward, because I think I want the record to be crystal clear on this when this comes up in community meetings and conversations. Mr.. MODICA Even if we had the $103 million for the pool right now, is there any part of the project that we could start that we are not already engaged in?
Speaker 6: No. We have still need to go through a number of steps before we can begin actual construction. We are currently in the design process working on conceptual and schematic design. We do need to release an environmental impact report and let everybody see what that design does in terms of the environmental impact. We need to go through the entitlement process at a city level. We need to go through the Coastal Commission entitlement process. And so even if we had, as you said, for funding, we would not be ready to start today or have facilities in the ground for, I'm estimating here about 18 months to two years at the very least, if we were to go incredibly quickly with that process.
Speaker 5: Now with money in hand, could we phase this project in any way other than it's currently phase, such as, for example, we're going through the design process now. Beyond that, is there any phasing of this project that could occur if we had the money in hand today?
Speaker 6: So we've looked at that and to see is are there segments of the pool that could be phase because we've done that with other projects. The Alamitos Bay Marina, for example, we've done in several phases because it's such a large project. The difference there is that that has discrete sections that you can isolate from all the other sections so that you can repair those work on that section, and when the money is exhausted, you can stop work and then go on to the next one. The pool that we are envisioning is trying to fit in a very tight space so that we're being cognizant of the the residents and of the cost. And we really do not see an ability to be able to phase the pool without having to shut down access to the bodies of water. And we really want to keep bodies of water available to the public. And so we don't see an opportunity for phasing on this project.
Speaker 5: Even if we were just, hypothetically speaking, able to phase this project, it still could not begin until we receive the necessary approvals and we're looking at 18 months on an accelerated pace.
Speaker 6: Yes, the 18 months is hard to estimate because the Coastal Commission can take some time and that's a very unpredictable year. But yes, that's correct. Roughly with, you know, give or take six months.
Speaker 5: Okay. So, I mean, what what I want to make clear is that the pool is a major priority for this council. I know it's a major priority for Vice Mayor Lowenthal, because during our discussions, we have decided to allocate $43 million to the pool, which is more than half of the available moneys we have in the Tidelands budget. So the pool is definitely a high priority, but we do have a $43 million gap to get the pool to the place where it's fully funded, correct?
Speaker 6: Yes, we have in total $60.1 million set aside with 43 left to be funded.
Speaker 5: So if we were to hear in the community, people say, you know, if you if you had the money, if you funded the pool today, we could start the pool sooner. That actually is just a factually inaccurate statement because we can't start the pool any sooner. It's not about having the money in hand. It's a process that we have to go through. Was that an accurate statement?
Speaker 6: Yes, that's correct.
Speaker 5: Okay. So in regards to the pool, you know, there have been some suggestions in regards to moving around some of the. The $43 million has already been allocated to the pool. The remaining money from the 95 million, some have said, well, could you allocate another million or 2 million or 3 million to the pool? And looking at some of our projects, you know, one a 1 to $3 million range can fund a lot of our smaller projects because we have projects that need to be funded as low as in the mid 100,000 range to a half a million dollar range is where most of our projects seem to be. I'm looking at the list. Does that sound about right?
Speaker 6: Yes. And that was one of the prioritization criteria is to try to get a balance of projects, realizing that all of the money could go to one or two projects and wait until you're ready to actually do them. But at the same time, you're losing opportunity to do some very, very needed and critical projects that are smaller dollar amount and important to the stakeholders as well.
Speaker 5: And did staff take that all into consideration with the recommendations in the list that have been provided?
Speaker 6: Yes, we did.
Speaker 5: I want to talk a little bit about Bluff Park lighting that doesn't appear on the projects that have been funded or the projects that are outlined in Attachment D in terms of projects that were previously funded. Where does the Bluff part of Bluff Park Lighting Project stand today?
Speaker 6: So we have a third list that's not included in this packet, but it's actually a very important part of our process, and it's called the Master Needs List. The Tidelands Master needs, it varies. We add projects to that. That really is our our list of projects that we know are important that don't yet have funding. That list ranges from 200 to $300 million. So it is a large list. Attachment D is really a smaller subset showing to help the Council understand what was previously funded as a priority over the last five years that now no longer is able to be funded with. When you take $232 million and apply $94 million worth of need. So the Bluff Lighting Project is still very much a project that's on our radar screen. It's on our master needs list. It will be eligible for funding if it determines that that's a high priority when we go through the next prioritization process. It won't just be attachment RD to look at. We can look at any project on the master needs list. That's a priority.
Speaker 5: Great. Thank you. And then I want to talk ask you a little bit about Leeway Sailing Center. Can you let us know what the staff's plan is in light of our current budget, in terms of the Leeway Sailing Center, including the parking lot and the pier?
Speaker 6: So Leeway Selling Center is definitely an important project. It was designed to be to have a number of different components funded. It is one. It has a very degraded parking lot. For example, anyone who's parked down there knows or you know, that's a very big need. We also have the pier and the and the dock, which are in severe disrepair and need to be upgraded. And then there's the building itself. And so under our recommendation, we are trying to look at what needs to be done and what can be done with the funding resources. And at the same time, we've had a request, request from both Parks and Rec and from some of the user groups to reevaluate the design a little. We've we've got the process and the project entitled and it's and it's available and it's ready to go forward if the funding were there. But there's been some requests on how can we maybe tweak that design. So what we're recommending is to fund the parking lot improvements. I believe that's approximately $600,000. We would also it's 505, 95, 500. We would then also prioritize the. The docking gangway, which would dock gangway and actually put aside about $417,000 for the classroom building rehabilitation at about $2.4 million. And then we would have the remaining actual real rebuild of the entire classroom on the list that would be funded at a future date. Once we've worked through some of those design issues.
Speaker 5: Thank you. I want to thank staff for your great work, especially Eric Lopez, who is our lead on Thailand's projects for the great work that you do and for your partnership. And of course, Rachel and Tom are always there to assist our staff with any issues we have with Thailand. So thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you. Vice Mayor Lowenthal.
Speaker 4: Just quickly, I wanted to acknowledge some residents that are here. I know we have residents from Alameda Speech as well as the Villa Riviera. And I want to thank you for your continued advocacy for projects not just in front of your homes, but really all along the Tidelands. And that's very meaningful. And my gratitude to Councilmember Pryce as well. She and I have worked very closely on these projects for several months, the project lists, I should say, and and I want to thank her for her great regard for the projects up and down the Tidelands. And I appreciate that. Thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you. Any public comment on the Tidelands item? Yes, sir. Come forward, please.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Council members. My name is Bill Five, resident of District three. I had a chance to review all the attachments online and after listening to Suja and Susie and Mr. Modica, I'm getting a bigger grasp of how big this project is and how it benefits the city. You know, honestly, you know, for me, the pool is like number one, because it benefits the entire city and all aspects. People come to the beach, they swim their swim, water polo, you know, all the teams and clubs that work out there. But I also listen to Mr. Modica and I see where we could probably juggle some of these other smaller projects with the money that's set aside and then come back and revisit the pool and make that a number one project. Again, as the funds come, as we get closer to the environmental reports and all the other cost commission reviews and all that. So. Well, I'd like to say, you know, keep the pool number one and, you know, benefit the entire city. I think we should also address the smaller projects throughout the city and the tidelands areas and then just reevaluate as funds come and we see what the cost of oil is doing, you know, across the markets, you know, and I know that's the big driver on that. So thank you for letting me see my piece. Thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you, sir. Next speaker, please make sure you identify yourself for the record.
Speaker 2: My name is Ray Thorne. I'm with Friends of Colorado. Lagoon. Went with them from the beginning. Want to comment on the part of the funds that are going toward the Colorado Lagoon restoration effort? And just a brief context. I've been with the Friends of Colorado Lagoon for over 15 years. We started as a group of concerned citizens going to County, L.A. County, Terminal Avenue, drain public meetings, addressed our concerns to them, ask for a special meeting and felt snubbed by the county, ignored and ended up taking the county to court to protest their approval of their mitigated negative declaration. We prevailed in court and forced the county to adopt a to redo the air and to reroute the terminal, having to drain to restore the Colorado lagoon. 95% of the wetlands or more in Long Beach have been devastated by the construction and building. And this is one of the very significant efforts in our in our city to actually do restorations of critical wetlands. I'm proud to say that we went from a competitive orientation with the can with the county and the city at that time, to moving toward a collaborative orientation with great help from Congressman Lowenthal, who was the Assembly member and Senate member from Amy Bodak. Eric Lopez, our assistant Tom said, Assistant City Manager Tom Modica And we're very appreciative of the support that we had from the council and especially Councilmember Price at this point. We want to we were instrumental in bringing in to the city over $15 million to do restoration of the Colorado Lagoon . We've diverted the storm flow waters that pollute the lagoon and they're now being treated in the cities that contaminated storm flow waters that produce. We've dredged out 80 million cubic 80,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment. All of that money was brought in by grants from outside of the city. So we're delighted that the city is now allocating tidelands funds to continue that restoration. And we strongly appreciate your and support the direction you're going. Actually are happy to give up 400,000 for restroom movement to support the the the aquarium of the Pacific which is very important. But we strongly support this and advocate that you move forward not only with the restoration within the lagoon, but with the open channel as well. Thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you, sir. Next speaker, please.
Speaker 4: My name is Christine Rycroft on the current president of the Friends of Colorado Lagoon. And again, to reiterate a little bit of Ray said, we're very appreciative of funds for the Colorado Lagoon Project moving forward in all aspects of it, to continue on the different phases and to look forward towards what an open waterway will look like . Because part of what we have there is a resource where all communities can come and use the lagoon. It's one of the few wetlands where people can access it, both in terms of educational programing and actually swimming within the lagoon. And that offers.
Speaker 7: The sort of unique ecosystem.
Speaker 4: And community resource that we are happy to see the city of Long Beach get behind. And we also just wanted to emphasize that putting money towards this sort of project is really funding.
Speaker 7: A unique.
Speaker 4: Setting as all over California, as well as the nation are looking at what cities do with their natural resources. And in funding the Colorado Lagoon Project, the city of Long Beach has the opportunity to be that sort of leader. So with all of the.
Speaker 7: Resources, time, support, staff.
Speaker 4: Time and the outside funding that the lagoon has gotten, it's essential that these two and. The faces of restoration go forward to make sure that that progress continues, because without them, the lagoon doesn't remain the healthy, vibrant ecosystem that it is now. So we wanted to thank you for the ongoing relationship between the Friends of Colorado Lagoon and the city and then acknowledge the support of the funding that will make sure this project is successful at such a timely and critical point. Thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you very much. Next speaker, please.
Speaker 5: Hi. My name is Leslie Sonnenberg and City. I live in the city. My daughter is a diver. She used to dove at the Belmont pool, which is obviously no longer in existence. And we would just urge the council to keep the pool a priority. It's been two years. I was at the City Council meeting in February of 2013, right after the pool was closed where there was a vote saying, we are going to rebuild the pool, we are going to put in diving, we are going to put in really everything that everybody wanted and that it was going to be a priority. It was the prior members of the council who are obviously no longer here indicated that they wanted to see it a priority to see if it could be expedited. Now, in the two years since that last city council meeting, it feels as though very little has been done. Yes, the pool has been knocked down. That took a year. We're talking now about having to have the environmental impact. It just feels as though in the last two years that very little has been done other than demolishing the pool and having design after design after design. The kids that currently use that need the use of the pool are just continuing to grow and grow. And by the time this pool is built, it seems as though my daughter is going to be graduated from college. And and this is her right now. She's nowhere near college. We would like to see a pool in her youth lifetime. Please make it a priority.
Speaker 0: Ma'am, just want to make sure I just clarify something. Thank you so much. The kids and I are very excited about the pool. I just want to make sure that, you know that a lot of the process, the pool is a priority. It's a priority to me. Prior to Councilman Price, it's a priority the entire council. But we also have to comply with a variety of legal regulations and framework that set from the state to the Coastal Commission to how we can demolish and can't demolish and the council. We also understand this is a huge financial commitment that we are making. Tonight, the council is looking at making a $43 million initial commitment, and we will make the rest of the commitment to get it done. But I just want you to know I understand your frustration, but know that at no time has the council slowed the process down. But the council has tried to put together a process that also included the community. And so I just want to make sure I just I said that I know it's frustrating, but we also are working with a variety of of of agencies here. Thank you very much. Come forward. You want to say something? Yeah. Come forward, please. And just say your name and you can go ahead. Okay.
Speaker 1: Is this okay? Hi, I'm Jenna Sonnenberg. That's my mom. And I just wanted to say that I was here at the other council meetings, the first one, and you guys did say yes to the pool and it was like, great for us to know that we were going to get a pool to learn new dives and to grow as a diver and seek our true potential. And it's been a very long time. And I know there's like a lot of things that we have to go through with the demolishing and going through the technical states of getting it back up. But I just would like to say that we as divers, we really need this pool, because right now we're at the Martin Luther King Junior Pool, and it's a very limiting area because there are not very many diving boards and there are no platforms at all. So we continually have to go to other pools to practice those platform dives. So I'm just trying to say that we would really hope to get this pool and hope that you guys consider that the pool is really important to all of the divers in the diving community. Thank you.
Speaker 0: Excellent job. Thank you so much. Please.
Speaker 1: Hi. My name is Drew Cummins. I live.
Speaker 7: In the Beaumont.
Speaker 1: Shore. I'm 11 years old and I've been diving with McCormick divers since I was seven years old. I got to learn how to swim at the Belmont when I was super little. I was there on the last day. The Belmont closed two years ago. My dream is to be able to see the pool being built and diving and diving well before I go off to college. My sisters are divers, too. There are two years older than me, and I honestly think I have a better chance to see the pool than they will ever. I don't really understand the money part of why we can't have the pool now. But if you look around, it affects a lot of us kids in our dreams. Thank you.
Speaker 0: A diver and an excellent speaker. Thank you. Next speaker.
Speaker 2: Please. For the record, Kevin McGowan 800 Ocean 90802 Villa Riviera resident since 1984. Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council. I want to thank you tonight for the work that you've done, including Staff Eric Lopez working with you regarding the Tidelands funds. The Alamitos Beach is such an integral part in the downtown area for not only the residents as well as the tourism and conventioneers. For years we've been hoping that there'll be some improvements. And most recently they did. They reviewed the El Meters beach stairway. Done a fabulous job. I must commend you on that. As far as the bike path, what I would also consider bike path and pedestrian walkway, because a day doesn't go by that I see a family with baby strollers walking down Shoreline Drive because they don't want to navigate the stairs. And again, this is very important that you approve that project regarding the concession stands. This has long been overdue as far as a concession in restrooms. For years, the Almeida's beach has hosted the Grand Prix, the Pride Festival, professional beach volleyball tournaments, the marathon and many other events. And to have a facility like that, we definitely need to have something that's representative of a world class city. So again, I applaud you for having that approved today as well. At the end, it's always a pleasure working with Susie Lowenthal, our council person. She's very receptive to our comments to build the Riviera, the harbor, the Pacific Tower. Again, thank you for your hard work. Have a good night.
Speaker 0: Thank you very much. Seeing no other see no other public comment. We go ahead. And we do have a motion any second to approve and receive and file the title. Councilwoman Price.
Speaker 5: You wanted to. Oh, I think. Oh, she's still here. I just wanted to make a comment regarding the the process and where it's been. I know it seems like nothing's happened, but we work on this. Regularly in June of 2014. There was a pool study session held right here in council chambers, and at that time the community came out and strongly advocated for a stakeholder committee so that the programmatic elements of the pool could reflect the swim and diving community in the city of Long Beach. As a result of that, a stakeholder committee was formed, took a while to come up with the names of those folks. They met several times. They went through a very democratic process of voting on the programmatic elements. And I'm happy to report that after the stakeholder committee met. Diving was recommended as a programmatic element of the pool, which it had not been previous to the stakeholder committee meeting. So even though it seems like nothing has happened, that process took several months. A lot of negotiation, a lot of discussion, a lot of back and forth, a lot of very emotional people feeling one way or the other that they wanted more for swim and some wanted more for water polo and some wanted more for diving. And the swimming community really came together to have a soft landing in terms of what their recommendations were going to be. And as a result of that process, which took many, many months, the programmatic design of the pool was created. So I know it seems like nothing is happening, and I know it's frustrating to to walk by there and not see it. My kids swim as well and they swim in the temporary pool. And so we're aware this is absolutely a priority for us. And, you know, what our options could be right now is let's say we just said we've got $95 million in our Tidelands Fund and we need 103 million to build the pool. So let's just say hypothetically that I made a motion tonight to allocate all $95 million to the pool, which I'm not going to do. But let's just say I did that. We would still be short and we wouldn't have enough money to build a pool that we won't be permitted to start any work on for 18 months . So we would sit here as a council with $95 million tied up for 18 months, not being able to do anything on the pool. Let's say in the alternative that we said, let's move a few, you know, let's not do the stairs and the bathrooms and the concession stands and all this stuff. Not that we're going to do that. I'm just saying hypothetically and we cobble up another, let's say, $3 million and we say, you know what, instead of $43 million, we're going to allocate $46 million to the pool. Okay. That closes the gap very minimally. It doesn't really get us that much closer to a pool. And now we've got six or seven projects that aren't funded and we still can't start the pool for 18 months. What I would rather see is we should share with the community that the pool remains a high priority and that it's getting more than half of the available money that we have, and that when more tidelands money comes in, we're able to give a significant amount of money to the pool to help close that $43 million gap. We're not going to close that gap with a million here or two millions there. We're going to close that gap with a substantial amount of money allocated to the pool, which I think is a priority for this council. We're moving to get there. When the pool project came before and I know somebody referenced something that happened two years ago, oil was trading at a much higher dollar amount at that time. Times have changed and our financial circumstances change. So we are doing our very best to communicate that it's a priority. But we are residents together. This is our city and we have to adjust to the change in Financial Times together with an attitude that's very collective and collaborative. You know, we can't build the pool today, so what other projects can we do and still make the pool a priority? And I hope that on some level, pool advocates understand that because it's in my district, it's a city wide asset and it's absolutely a priority to me, as are all the projects on Thailand's that we've been able to fund and recommend tonight. So thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you. And and and as we vote for those who have not been following this project, we've all been referring it tonight, including myself, as a pool. But we're building an aquatic center just so just so that we all, all know. So with that, please go ahead and cast your votes.
Speaker 1: Motion carries seven zero.
Speaker 0: Great. Thank you all for coming out. And we're now going to go to public comment. And then go on to the rest of the agenda. It's a long agenda. I'm going to have the first three public commenters please line up.
Recommendation to receive a report on the Tidelands Capital Budget, and approve the 5-Year Capital Plan and prioritization of projects.  (Districts 2,3)