Speaker 2: I. You know, you guys know our SEC. Madam Secretary is very fast on that. We get everyone. We just listen to people. Yes. All right. 11 eyes. Council Bill 71 is passed. Okay. Next up, councilman, clerk, will you please put Councilperson 52 on the floor?
Speaker 1: Jasmine's president I move that council bill 752 be placed upon final consideration and do pass.
Speaker 2: It has been moved and second it. Andrew Webb up. Can we hear the staff report?
Speaker 11: All right. Thank you again. Andrew Webb here from CPD. This is a request for rezoning of properties at 39, 55, 39, 65 and 3995 North High Street from Ibe you oh two to IMX three you owe to. This request is in Council District three. It's at the north edge of the Cole neighborhood. It's a little over three, three quarters of an acre at the intersection of 40th and high. Currently occupied by two industrial structures, the subject site zone or the surrounding zoning is also primarily ivy UO two, with some mixed use zoning to the south and a couple of planned unit developments.
Speaker 2: Andrew Scuse me real quick. Why don't you go black back one one slide.
Speaker 11: Absolutely.
Speaker 2: Another slide. Another slide. Okay. This is Council District nine. I just went, Oh, geez, I know. I don't want to get confused with a Lopez and.
Speaker 1: All council district three so bad.
Speaker 2: So let's let's just.
Speaker 11: I apologize for the misnomer there. This is indeed Council District nine.
Speaker 2: This is fine District nine. Everyone watching in at the OC. Go ahead. You can go back. Sorry to interrupt. You just wanted to be clear about that.
Speaker 11: Land users in the area are a are a fairly fine grained mix of industrial, commercial, multi and or single and multi-unit residential. And then of course to the north there on the north side of 40th over the A-line tracks, there is a major intermodal rail and trucking facility. Now, this aerial shows the subject site, along with an associated redevelopment site. They're kind of at the top of the of the frame. The subject site is proposed for rezoning to enable the construction of a parking garage that would serve redevelopment of this this collection of pre-war industrial structures. They're further west along 39th. This is a photograph or photographs of the subject site here. The first looking kind of southwest, a long high street and the one on the bottom, they're looking northwest along high. These photos are looking across High Street to the east. You can see that the development across the street includes residential, some industrial and some outdoor storage uses. These photos were taken at where the alley intersects 40th. So we're looking east at the back of the subject's site and then west toward the industrial use to the west of the site. So the existing zoning, as I mentioned, is I.B. with the quota or billboard overlay. I.B. is a is a high intensity industrial district and it does allow surface and structured parking. However, it requires fairly deep setbacks to the primary street, which in this case would be High Street. This photograph, this aerial shows the variation of setbacks in the area. As you can see, the structure at the north end of the subject site actually is built right up at the street. The structure on the south part of the site is set back about 30 feet. The applicant proposes this the IMX zone to allow full use of the site for this parking garage. So again, the IMX three, that is an industrial neighborhood context mixed use with a maximum height of three stories. The idea is to promote industrial mixed use, but in a pedestrian scaled environment with buildings up at the street, kind of shop front appearances and an active street level, it does allow the shallow front setbacks. It has high build to requirements and is generally accommodates a variety of commercial, civic and residential uses. Terms of the process to date. Informational notice did go out to all the Reno's counselors and other stakeholders on April 9th. Planning Board held a hearing on June 21st at which they recommended approval. The committee considered this request on July 11th and also recommended approval. There are quite a few registered neighborhood organizations that consider the subject site to be within their boundaries. All have received notices several times throughout the process. We have received one email from the whole neighborhood in support of this proposed rezoning. To approve a rezoning. As you know, the Council must find that the request meets these five criteria from the Denver zoning code. In terms of the first criteria with regard to consistency with adopted plans, there are five plans that impact the site comprehensive plan and Blueprint Denver and then also the River North Plan, the 30th and Blake Station Area Plan and the subsequent Hyde amendments that were adopted last year and the Elyria and Swansea Neighborhoods plans which abuts the area in terms of the comprehensive plan, the proposed IMX three district further several policies by increasing the feasibility of development on a smaller site in keeping with the existing fine grained mix of of uses in this area and small block sizes and furthers a mixed use redevelopment opportunities and support of nearby redevelopment of the nearby complex of of older industrial structures. The Blueprint Denver identifies this area as an area of change and highlights this particular site for mixed use. The River North Plan recommends a general transit oriented development and mixed use for this area, and this request is consistent with that. The 38th and Blake Station area plan does not technically impact this site, but it does impact the larger redevelopment site to the west. And for this area generally recommends a mix of uses the Elyria and Swansea. A neighborhood plan recommends a mixed uses in this area with a focus on employment, which is consistent with the IMX Zone District. With regard to the other criteria, the this request will result in the uniform application of building form, use and design regulations for the IMX three District Implements Plans for walkable, transit oriented development, thereby furthering public health, safety and welfare and staff agrees with the applicant's proposed justifying circumstance. As I'm sure you're all aware there, we've observed high levels of redevelopment and interest in this area. Redevelopment activity in this area intensified by the opening of the 30th and Blake Arcade Station and the efforts of the Arts District. And finally, staff finds this proposal is consistent with the surrounding industrial neighborhood context. So with that, CPD recommends approval based on the finding that all these criteria have been met. And I'm happy to answer any questions.
Speaker 2: All right. Thank you, Andrew. We have five speakers for this bill. I'm going to ask all five speakers to come up to the front. You have 3 minutes each. Bruce O'Donnell, John McIntyre, Brett Parmalee, Trina Moyer and Sekou. Bruce O'Donohue a first.
Speaker 13: Good evening, Mr. President, and members of council. My name is Bruce O'Donnell, and I'm at 770 Sherman Street here in Denver. And earlier this evening, this document was passed out to each of you. And I thought it might be helpful to give it some context to this rezoning request. In addition to what was provided in the staff report immediately west of this site is a nine acre adaptive reuse of a former industrial site, and to reuse these grade old brick buildings that have significant architecture and will be rhino's next hot spot. We need to be able to create a parking reservoir because that's the way to preserve the buildings and reuse the site. And so the purpose of this rezoning is to set up a parking reservoir for phase one of the redevelopment of the Denver Rock Trail property. And we're proposing I am x three, which would allow approximately 400 stall parking structure to be built on the site. It will comply with all of the requirements in the IMX zoning to include the possibility of activating the ground floor, special design and screening and transparency on the on the ground floor. And in fact, the parking garage is going through SDP review right now in the planning department. So that's kind of the context for this rezoning request. And members of the design team and the ownership team and I are all here tonight in available to answer any questions. Should you have any. Thank you.
Speaker 2: All right. Thank you, Mr. O'Donnell. John McIntyre. If you would, all of the folks that I call if you make your way up here. So here's a little time. Go ahead.
Speaker 1: John McIntyre with Tribe Tactics, 1759 Dahlia.
Speaker 2: Street hit answer any questions? Great. Thank you, Brett Parmalee.
Speaker 1: Brett Parmalee, 1302 South Vine with Saunders Construction here to answer any questions.
Speaker 2: Great. Thank you. Trina Moyer.
Speaker 3: Hello. I'm Trina Moyer. I'm a resident of Denver, and I'm here representing the whole neighborhood. As the vice president of the Neighborhood Association Board, we are in support of the rezoning of the properties located on North High Street in order that a parking structure can be built near the Rock Creek Rock Drill Development site if reasonably priced parking is made available. We believe that this will reduce the number of patrons parking elsewhere within coal, thereby keeping most of the on street parking available for all residents. The new zoning would also allow for possible ground street.
Speaker 7: Activation of the.
Speaker 3: Parking structure, which is preferred by the Coal Neighborhood Association. I also would like to express our appreciation to rock drill, for their willingness to engage.
Speaker 7: Us and the coal residents in their process. And we look forward to.
Speaker 3: Continued communications and collaboration.
Speaker 2: Thank. Great. Thank you. All right. So who?
Speaker 8: Oh Masuku as before, same organization went to three ABC. Okay. Continue on a dialog. Same thing, different location. But I didn't get it. You went. Why don't you hit something? Going to try it another way? Because what we're going to do is we're going to document the records, so. We're talking about congruent. See in It's Only Change and we're talking about making sure that it's like other pieces of property in the area. And so we want to really work on confusing this thing because we want to get people so caught up in the details of things that you missed the forest for the tree. Now I've been to them community meetings. Let me tell you how it works. Powerful people come in with a paradigm framework. And they tell the people flat out this is going to happen. It's going to happen. What do you want to happen or not? Because there are powerful people doing powerful things and we are all a city council already lined up for like the last 13 zip. People are now afraid that if they don't put an input into that is congruent to the paradigm, they will have no no input. So they operating out of fear. Well, if we don't go along with the program and we don't get none. And if they keep it going where they keep it going, then, you know, somebody's going to get in trouble because they oppose this. And you know how they do things. Now, historically, local governments were involved in the rezoning of Jewish people in Nazi Germany to put them into concentration camps. Same justification, always going to be found and abuse and everything, and then end up engaged in a world war that killed millions of people. And the rescue of humanity. Yeah. Yeah. And then because of that, there is a United Nations resolution on human rights violations that include genocide, gentrification and ethnic cleansing. The guy in Yugoslavia, he was doing life imprisonment and they have hung folks for that because it requires the requirement death penalty. Hmm. Imprisonment for life and enormous fines. Now, imagine this. That's filed in the United Nations under. As a focal point. Then all of a sudden, watch tourism drop. Watch economic development drop. And you know as well as I know, I've been here long enough to see this boom bust thing with you real estate, because it's unplanned. You got a misses cycle plan. Missed cycle didn't include marijuana. This was 10,000 people coming here every month. And where they're going to live must cycle and.
Speaker 0: Displace the local population.
Speaker 2: All right. You can have a seat. Thank you. Appreciate it. Yeah. Wow. Well, that concludes our speakers questions for members of council. I have a question for you, Andrew. So we had one person in our position on the on the planning board. Do you did you do you remember what the issue was there?
Speaker 11: Yes, Mr. President. The issue was the retention of the oh two billboard overlay.
Speaker 2: That's right. Okay. And. I mean, did they talk a little bit more about that or.
Speaker 11: I believe the commissioner's stance was that is this area redeveloped into more of a of a people oriented place with, you know, they're kind of the transit oriented development that's coming along with the 38 and Blake Station area plan that he didn't feel that billboard uses were remained appropriate for the area.
Speaker 2: Okay. So we have the 38th new question. We have the 30th and Blake design overlay, which you were actually a part of and working on. So do these specific properties fall within the design overlay?
Speaker 11: Yes, Mr. President. You know, I neglected to mention that during our presentation, but the the the recommended height here is consistent or the proposed height here of three stories is consistent with the base height recommendation of the 38th and Blake stationary, a plan height amendments which did include this area.
Speaker 2: Okay. And they call for activation of ground floor. Call for ground floor uses as as one of the is Trina moya from the neighborhood said so I guess what I'm trying to get to is and maybe someone from you know the owner's representative team can answer this. Is there a plan to activate the ground floor for the for the parking structure?
Speaker 11: And I'll let them speak to that. But I would say generally that the IMX three zone also does have some requirements for ground level activation entrances, transparency, that sort of thing. But right. I'll pass on to Mike to the development team here. Great.
Speaker 1: I can respond to that. John McIntyre with the architects. The, um, the parking structure that's being.
Speaker 2: Proposed currently is being designed to meet the IMX requirements for transparency.
Speaker 1: And street.
Speaker 0: Edge activation.
Speaker 1: It is also being designed for future conversion with flat four.
Speaker 2: Uses and the appropriate floor to ceiling.
Speaker 1: Heights should it need to be converted to full active ground use under the design overlay when it comes in. So it's being designed to meet the current requirements of mix with allowance, to fulfill the requirements of the.
Speaker 0: Design overlay.
Speaker 2: In terms of floor to ceiling.
Speaker 1: Clearance as a ground floor, height and flat levels and at the beach.
Speaker 2: Okay. And for the owners, is there a commitment to do it or are we still just talking about conception at this point?
Speaker 1: We're still talking about conception at this point. I think the there's a need and a requirement for us to meet all the requirements of the IMX zoning until we fully understand the design overlay.
Speaker 2: Requirements and those are issued.
Speaker 1: Legally.
Speaker 2: All right, Councilman Ortega.
Speaker 7: Thank you, Mr. President. Andrew, can you help me understand why we are doing parking for a project that's on a different block and that development is not providing its own parking. I mean, it may have some of its own parking, but why throw allowing an offsite parking structure for a different development that's not even adjacent?
Speaker 11: Councilmember Ortega, going back to the aerial here, hopefully you can see it on screen.
Speaker 7: Yeah, I'm real familiar with the site.
Speaker 11: The the sites are actually owned. They're under the same ownership. Okay. And and I believe the same development team is working on both projects. But the as you can see there, the rock drill site itself is fairly dense with prewar brick structures. While the while the subject site here is probably, I would say, 1950s to sixties, more modest industrial structures. And I think the idea is, is rather than to create the space on the rock drill site for for parking by tearing down some of those more historic structures is to use this space right nearby to to provide that parking and preserve some of the the unique architecture on the rock drill site.
Speaker 2: And.
Speaker 7: In.
Speaker 2: Councilwoman along along with that and correct me if I'm wrong here, this is the 39th Street, the channel that's coming coming through there. And they will be taking some of what could be used for parking some of the parking locations right there along 39th as well for this.
Speaker 11: Mr. President, that that is correct. That that project will run along 39th Street there, including the parcels that you see to the south that are currently being used for storage. So some of the it's not I'm not sure exactly how it will impact the parking, but it could be expected that parking will change.
Speaker 7: So I had another question. So basically what? I would like to know from Mr. O'Donnell is. Yes, I was just looking at the the PowerPoint, and it showed some schematics that look like we're not preserving that property. It would be a whole new development on that nine acre site. Can you correct me if if I'm saying that wrong?
Speaker 13: Yes. Also, if I could go back to your parking question for just a moment. We have also acquired property between High and William Street in. So there's a direct pedestrian connection from the park, the proposed parking structure site straight into the heart of the rock drill site on the west side of William Street. And so there is an easy pedestrian connection there.
Speaker 7: Okay. So is and I know the other property is not what we're dealing with tonight, but because it is already tied together via this application. Has that property been re zoned or is that a different project that's yet to come before this council?
Speaker 13: It is a different project. It is also zoned I.A. today. And as Triber architects explained a moment ago, we're waiting for the design overlay in in all of the 38 Blake Hyde amendments work to get work its way through and become adopted before we take any next steps.
Speaker 7: Okay. So is it anticipated that you would. The developer would utilize or the landowner, whichever is going to be doing the actual development is going to keep those buildings or actually level that and put in entirely new.
Speaker 13: So the intent and I'm going to use some approximations here right now, but I would estimate that about 60% of the site is built out with beautiful old red brick with classic architecture, old industrial architecture. In the intent is to preserve all of that and have this anchor of this be an adaptive reuse of those existing structures . Okay. And then about 40% of the structures there are of cinder block in in kind of 1960s, finest in. So the newer, taller buildings that that are in the plan right now would replace some of that. That isn't as architecturally significant.
Speaker 7: So in the newer, taller buildings, is it anticipated that given the fact that you have nine acres, that that site will provide some of its own parking?
Speaker 13: Yes.
Speaker 7: Okay. All right. And. So the people who own that property now, are they the actual applicant or is it someone else who, you know, is trying to purchase the land that's that's rezoning this today?
Speaker 13: So the property owners are the actual applicant and they're in a joint venture with Saunders development to pursue this whole plan.
Speaker 7: Great. I have no further questions. Thank you.
Speaker 2: Thank you. Thank you. Councilman Ortega. All right, Councilman Flynn.
Speaker 9: Thank you, Bruce.
Speaker 13: Yes, sir.
Speaker 9: Might as well just stand there. I remember going through the complex there, rock drill complex a few years back and was told that there on that site there are about 76 or 77 separate structures that grew over the years when that was an industrial complex and. With the if the ability to put the offsite parking garage is is granted through this rezoning, how many structures that otherwise might have to come down to satisfy parking requirements? How many of those structures would remain if you know.
Speaker 13: We'll put our heads together here. I think we can.
Speaker 9: Thank you. In other words, how many how many buildings of historical value might we actually be re using by allowing this off off site parking you?
Speaker 2: That number of existing buildings isn't as high as 70, but there is a.
Speaker 0: Number of very small buildings.
Speaker 9: Including those we.
Speaker 2: Are looking at retaining.
Speaker 0: 18 large.
Speaker 1: Historic structures. So the predominantly brick masonry to through structures as well as some of the more interesting manufacturing buildings that are located along 40th, which is the vast majority of the historically significant buildings, was only one building from earlier that we're looking at the potential of taking apart and reassembling because it was built between two more historically significant buildings. The balance of those are buildings that would be taken down are 1950s metal sheets.
Speaker 9: Right. Okay. Does that does the the buildings that would be retained on the 40th, does that include the one that has the the railroad siding that goes through there?
Speaker 0: Yeah, we're looking to retain both the.
Speaker 1: Spurs and all of the and increase the lines and courtyards within this one.
Speaker 9: Okay. Thank you, Mr. President.
Speaker 2: Yeah, thank you. Councilman Flynn. Councilman Espinosa.
Speaker 12: A question on the euro to. I'm looking at chapter 59. How was that? That was called you oh two in chapter 59, wasn't it. Or what was it called in chapter 59.
Speaker 11: But Councilmember Espinosa, I will have to get back to you on that. I'm not sure if that if that, you know, to overlay nomenclature was a carryover from former Chapter 59 or if that was in the current zoning code. But it it is it is an overlay zone in the overlay section of of the current zoning code. And it is the billboard overlay.
Speaker 12: That somebody from CPD or the city attorney. How is the year or two mapped in 2010? Thank you, Councilman Espinosa, Nate Lucero, Assistant City Attorney. When the city resumed in 2010, the UO two overlay, which is the billboard use overlay, was mapped everywhere where it was. Presently allowed at that time. And so the properties that were already entitled with the billboard use retained that.
Speaker 2: Use through the.
Speaker 12: You oh to. So would that have been so this was for this is currently I b was that a use that was allowed in i b and therefore it got you go to add it on even though it didn't go into a new zone district. Andrew Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the B is a Denver zoning code zone district, is that right? So in 2010 when that property was re zoned, it was rezone to I.B.M. to. Well, because we didn't actually have eyes on districts in the prior. What would that have? Well, we did. We had i0i1 and I to. Okay. So that would have been on a billboard use would have been allowed in the I zero. I wonder I to.
Speaker 11: I believe that is correct, yes.
Speaker 12: So there are five one, two, three, four, five, five different adopted plans that relate to this. Do any of them speak to signage and billboards?
Speaker 11: I would have to confirm that. But having read through all of those several times, I'm not aware of any of them really addressing specifically the issue of of off premise signage.
Speaker 12: The reason I ask is having been through a steering committee and their neighborhood planning process. We have billboards on federal, but we never actually that sort of subject never came off. And so do we have a sort of weakness in our process whereby we don't actually have a mechanism to address whether billboards are, in fact, appropriate going forward or not? Because I get that the former I's zone districts in Chapter 59 allowed them. But when we move from a in a high zoned district into our most flexible zone district, which is IMAX, which could be 100% residential, it could be 30% industrial, could it be 100% commercial? We're talking about different animal. And if we're not having the conversation about signage during a planning process or during a rezoning, you know, when do we have it? And so I think it's it's relevant. I mean, I'm glad that somebody from Planning Board raised the issue because instead of suddenly realizing that there's a sort of weakness in our process about when do when do we start having that conversation? Obviously, we've we've run into this problem when we went to LED signage and things like that. But so I guess I would like from CPD if you could get back to me on what, if any, of our current neighborhood plans address signage going forward and if we have that as sort of our NPI process where we're talking about overhead signage because they're just this layer of of things that apply to various parts of the city that should be discussed and we should have direction when it when these things come to us. So thank you.
Speaker 2: All right. Thank you, Councilman Espinosa. Councilman, do.
Speaker 1: I think it was Bruce s question about your handout, please? I want to talk about the picture, the vision and master plan. This is a very impressive picture. And can you I don't know if you've got a copy of it. Can you describe where this parking garage is and the other two buildings that are in this development? It's a very impressive looking, complete plan here. And I just want to make sure I in my mind, I know what are old buildings destroyed was brand new where this parking garage is.
Speaker 13: Yes, sir. Councilman, do the the page that is entitled Vision and Master Plan two. In the far right of that image, there's a light blue structure in that is the proposed parking structure. In it has a high street address. But but there's a connection straight into the heart of the bigger site across William Street, Mid-Block.
Speaker 1: Oh. Okay.
Speaker 13: Are we. Let's make sure we're looking at the same picture. No, no. Okay. I'm sorry. I'm looking at this picture. So that in that picture, the parking structure is in the bottom left corner.
Speaker 1: Okay. So first.
Speaker 13: Yes, this is the picture, correct? Yes, sir. So in the bottom left corner, there's an image of the parking structure and it's illuminated. Is there a way to.
Speaker 11: Thank. Yeah.
Speaker 13: You don't have that picture. So in the picture that you all have in front of you this evening, in the handout, there's an illustrative that's at night with all of these buildings illuminated in the parking structure is in the bottom left corner and it in it actually says Denver rock drill on it in that image.
Speaker 1: Okay. Okay.
Speaker 13: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Can you describe? Are these all your buildings going off to to the right there? Is this your entire plan?
Speaker 13: Yes, it is.
Speaker 1: Okay. Can you just give us just for education, can you explain what the future. Sure.
Speaker 13: So that right now the vision for the development program is that the generally single storey, historic redbrick structures would be reused for a lot of open office type uses and also retail, restaurant entertainment and recreation type uses. There's the taller buildings too, that further to the right are more futuristic at this point. But we're in discussions with the hotel company to perhaps do a hotel there and then some taller mixed use buildings in. Part of the idea, obviously, is to take advantage of the proximity to the 30th and Blake Rail Station.
Speaker 1: And I'm sure that some of those buildings will have its own parking like this parking garage is not going to satisfy the needs of that entire future.
Speaker 13: That's correct. That the the new buildings, the multistory new buildings would self park in in this parking reservoir would be available for visitors and tenants in the primarily in the red brick buildings where the there's a tradeoff. If we want to preserve and re-use those buildings, we need to find a parking solution.
Speaker 1: And it looks like some mixed use. Additional residential as well.
Speaker 13: Possibly. Yes.
Speaker 1: Very impressive image. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you.
Speaker 2: Okay. Yeah. Thank you. Let's go to Councilman Flynn. Back up.
Speaker 9: Thank you, Mr. President. When Councilman Espinosa was asking about the use overlay, he prompted a few questions that I had intended to ask, but kind of dismissed. So maybe, Bruce, I could ask you, are you intending to use billboards to bring billboards onto the site? And that's why you want to preserve this?
Speaker 13: Not at this time, no, sir.
Speaker 9: But you just want to preserve the right because it's there now.
Speaker 13: Generally, yes. So the this overlay, in order for a billboard to in order for a new billboard to appear anywhere in the city of Denver where this overlay is in place, a billboard somewhere else in the city would have to go away. Mm hmm. And that's the only way a new billboard could come here.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 13: And so the thinking is, is that it's a property, right? That that maybe someday could be of some value, in particular with the line running adjacent to this site. But there is no plan. There's no activity in in in a billboard somewhere else in the city would have to go away for anything to happen here.
Speaker 9: And, Mr. President, the reason I came back in after Councilman Espinosa was I was searching the other IMX zones in the areas, particularly along Walnut and Larimer and along Brighton Boulevard and all of the I Amex parcels there also have the billboard overlay as part of their zoning. So it's not an unusual thing. But would it allow, Andrew, would the billboard overlay allow the type of signage that we see, say, at the Convention Center, the lighted LED signs that advertise third party businesses or events or things like that?
Speaker 11: Councilman Nu Generally, yes, the bill overlay does have those location restrictions. It does have that. It does require the cap and trade program, but it would allow the the advertisement for off of off site services or or products.
Speaker 9: And would it need some special additional approval to do animated or variable messaging signs, billboards?
Speaker 11: My apologies. Without the without the the the Denver zoning code right in front of me, I can't answer that, but I will certainly circle back to you.
Speaker 9: Or perhaps I think the answer is yes.
Speaker 12: Councilman Flynn, at this point in time, the Denver zoning code does not allow billboards to be animated or illuminated. There are a couple that were grandfathered in 2010, but at this time, billboards are not allowed to be on billboards.
Speaker 9: That's all.
Speaker 2: All right. Thank you. All right, Councilman Espinosa, back up.
Speaker 12: I would be in support of them moving the one that's next to the student housing on Colfax. I mean, literally right outside the windows over to the side. The question I have, because everybody who comes in speaks, has to sort of mention who they are and most stay where they live. Mr. Donald, can you tell me who the principals are for? 3939 Williams Building Corp..
Speaker 13: Yes, the principles are the Weiss family, and they're Denver residents and business people in they've owned this site, I believe, since 1993. And they operate a business there. They operate their business there today and are in the process of relocating that business to accommodate the adaptive reuse of the site.
Speaker 12: Okay. Yeah, it's all right. This is there are so many layers between us and who's really making the ask. I just would like to know. So thank you.
Speaker 2: All right. Thank you. This concludes our questions. Now close counsel Bill 752 Comments. Members of council. This is again in my district. There are multiple things happening in this area right here. Full disclosure, I live down the street from this site. I think you got a you got a very active neighborhood. And you guys had to reach out to a lot of individuals, some of which aren't even close to this site, which. Again. Let's work on that. On our notification for neighborhoods, on some of these things. You probably didn't even receive a response from some of these neighbors, but the whole neighborhood is embedded right in this site. And rhino arts is is really close, close by. I'm going to be supporting it. This is something that I think, you know, again, it it it is on on par with the guidelines and consistent with what our plans are. And so I'll be supporting this. Other. I keep my screen just one out. Okay. No other comments. It's been more than a second reminder of Secretary Rocha.
Speaker 4: Black eye. Clark Espinosa. I. Flynn. I Gilmore. I cash in. Can eat. I. Lopez. I knew. Ortega.
Speaker 7: I.
Speaker 4: Sesan. Mr. President.
Speaker 2: I police those voting against the results.
Speaker 4: The sorry, councilor.
Speaker 2: 11 eyes. 11 eyes. Constable 752 has passed. Councilman. Clerk, will you please put up Council Bill 750 on the floor?
A bill for an ordinance changing the zoning classification for 3955, 3965 and 3995 North High Street in Cole.
Rezones property at 3955, 3965, and 3995 North High Street from I-B, UO-2 to I-MX-3, UO-2 (industrial to industrial, mixed-use) in Council District 9. The Committee approved filing this bill at its meeting on 7-11-17.