Common descent provides the best and most thorough explanation for a variety of facts concerning the geographical distribution of plants and animals across the world.This is especially obvious in the field of insular biogeography.
This theory of human evolution with common descent (or common ancestry) is accepted by most scientists, both Christian and non-Christian, although there is debate about some details [like the unresolved questions in the note below] in the timings and shape of our family tree. In other words, one can affirm Common Descent and Intelligent Design, Common Descent and Darwinian Evolution, or Intelligent Design and not Common Descent.. Above, Michael Behe (a prominent ID theorist) describes the strong genetic support for a common ancestry of humans and chimps. Further evidence comes from the field of biogeography because evolution with common descent provides the best and most thorough explanation for a variety of facts concerning the geographical distribution of plants and animals across the world. This is especially obvious in the field of insular biogeography. This evidence explicates that evolution does occur, and is able to show the natural processes by which the biodiversity of life on Earth developed. Additionally, this evidence supports the modern evolutionary synthesis —the current scientific theory that explains how and why life changes over time. Further evidence for common descent comes from genetic detritus such as pseudogenes, regions of DNA that are orthologous to a gene in a related organism, but are no longer active and appear to be undergoing a steady process of degeneration from cumulative mutations. This evidence explicates that evolution does occur, and is able to show the natural processes by which the biodiversity of life on Earth developed. Additionally, this evidence supports the modern evolutionary synthesis —the current scientific theory that explains how and why life changes over time. Summary. Since Darwin, homology has been cited in textbooks as a major proof for evolution. A review of the literature on homology indicates that the theory does not provide evidence for evolutionary naturalism, and that the common examples of homology can be better explained by Creation. However, Dobzhansky admitted that ’homology does not prove evolution, in the sense that nobody has actually witnessed the gradual changes in the millions of consecutive generations which led from a common ancestor to a bird on the one hand and to man on the other’. The prediction in this instance is that if evolution (as first observed by Charles Darwin) occurs, then all life might have descended from a common ancestor. This is not only a hypothesis, but is the basis for the Scientific Theory of Universal Common Descent (UCD). There is only one way I know of to falsify the theory of UCD, and that is to produce a life form that does not conform to nested hierarchy. All it takes is one. One of the most dubious challenges to universal common descent I have reviewed is Takahiro Yonezawa and Masami Hasegawa, “Some Problems in Proving the Existence of the Universal Common Ancestor of Life on Earth,” The Scientific World Journal, 2011. • Comparison of the Human and Great Ape Chromosomes as Evidence for Common Ancestry from the Evolution Evidence Page (Robert Williams); this page is 44% main body, plus 56% references. • Human Chromosome 2 is a fusion of two ancestral chromosomes by Alec MacAndrew, and. In other words, one can affirm Common Descent and Intelligent Design, Common Descent and Darwinian Evolution, or Intelligent Design and not Common Descent.. Above, Michael Behe (a prominent ID theorist) describes the strong genetic support for a common ancestry of humans and chimps. Universal common descent through an evolutionary process was first proposed by Charles Darwin in On the Origin of Species, which ended with There is a grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one. Common descent describes how, in evolutionary biology, a group of organisms share a most recent common ancestor. There is evidence of common descent that all life on Earth is descended from the last universal ancestor. Common ancestry between organisms of different species arises during speciation, in which new species are established from a single ancestral population Homology is not merely a minor proof of evolution, but instead has been widely cited by evolutionists as one of the most compelling lines of evidence for their theory. 2,3 Darwin concluded that homology was critically important evidence for common descent: However, Dobzhansky admitted that ’homology does not prove evolution, in the sense that nobody has actually witnessed the gradual changes in the millions of consecutive generations which led from a common ancestor to a bird on the one hand and to man on the other’.
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/education/origins/human-descent.htm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent https://answersingenesis.org/theory-of-evolution/evidence/does-homology-provide-evidence-of-evolutionary-naturalism/ https://dennisdjones.wordpress.com/2014/06/09/universal-common-descent/ http://www.asa3.org/ASA/education/origins/human-descent.htm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_descent https://answersingenesis.org/theory-of-evolution/evidence/does-homology-provide-evidence-of-evolutionary-naturalism/
how does common descent applied to the evolution of cameras