10.6092/issn.1973-9494/7114
Il vasto patrimonio culturale di manufatti e di reperti biologici antichi può attualmente essere investigato con molte metodologie e tecnologie. Ne deriva una crescente diffusione di studi sul DNA, isotopici e morfogeometrici e una crescita esponenziale delle pubblicazioni e dei risultati bio-archeologici di inestimabile valore per ambiti interpretativi diversi, filogenetici, storici, archeologici. Il presente lavoro descrive uno studio morfologico e molecolare di un raro reperto di Felis proveniente da un orizzonte del Bronzo Antico. Il report offre per altro l’occasione per una breve disamina sull’addomesticamento del gatto, la provenienza di tale pratica e sull’importanza zooarcheologica della relazione con Homo nel Mediterraneo occidentale.
application/pdf
1973-9494
7114
2
en
Mario Cosenza
Conservation Science in Cultural Heritage
cat taming
Cat Taming in the Western Mediterranean. Issues, Problematics and Unpredictability in the Light of Bio-archaeological Approaches to a Museum Specimen
Text.Serial.Journal
https://conservation-science.unibo.it/
15
Articles
2017-06-01
2017-07-04
2017-06-01
2017-09-04
13-25
CSCH
Mario Cosenza
2015
10.6092/issn.1973-9494/7114
13
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale di Sicilia, Palermo
1973-9494
2
cat taming
en
25
Cat Taming in the Western Mediterranean. Issues, Problematics and Unpredictability in the Light of Bio-archaeological Approaches to a Museum Specimen
https://conservation-science.unibo.it/article/download/7114/6825
15
C     AT TAMING IN THE WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN.
      ISSUES, PROBLEMATICS AND UNPREDICTABILITY IN
      THE LIGHT OF BIO-ARCHAEOLOGICAL APPROACHES
       TO A MUSEUM SPECIMEN

    Roberto Miccichè, Pietro Valenti, Andrea D. Messina, Luca Sìneo*1
    Dipartimento STEBICEF, LabHOMO, Università di Palermo, Italy
    Noboyuki Yamaguchi
    Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences, Qatar University, Doha
    Giulio Catalano
    Department of Cultural Heritage (DBC), Università di Bologna, Ravenna, Italy
    Stefano Reale, Mario Cosenza
    Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale di Sicilia, Palermo, Italy

    Keywords: Felis silvestris Felis silvestris catus, animal domestication, Sicily, cat taming


    1. Introduction

    Applying a technological approach to “cultural heritage conservation” today envis-
ages physical, philosophical and managerial sustainability aimed at preserving, pro-
tecting and caring for the sites and signs that have distinguished humans during their
evolution and recent history. This is a multidisciplinary approach, which includes the
skills and technology of historians, engineers, archaeologists, physicists, chemists,




                                                                                                       CONSERVATION SCIENCE IN CULTURAL HERITAGE
biologists, and anthropologists, in collaboration with trained conservators. A well-pre-
served and accurately conserved material is a fertile and fruitful field of investigation
full of unexpected results. A network of cultural heritage conservation consequently
provides not only a modern approach to preservation and conservation but is a neces-
sary step in the scientific exploitation of cultural heritage.
    A substantial range of significant questions in understanding our past finds answers
in bioarchaeological studies. These include issues ranging from genetic relatedness
to palaeodiet, ecology and health, or archaeozoological questions on hunter-gather-
er subsistence, or times and mode of domestication. Several fundamental answers
come to archaeology and to the global Cultural Heritage Network from new genetic
approaches to museum collections of extinct animals and plants, or humans [1-3].
Nevertheless, new approaches in the study of morphologies can be of extreme impor-
tance for the taxonomy of museum collections.
    One of the most recent issues in archaeology and in related sciences such as physi-
cal anthropology is: what was the contribution of anthropochorus fauna to human evo-
lution across time?
    In the light of the Neolithic Transition to a productive economy, with storage of food-
stuffs and opportunistic animals and pests, humans soon appreciated having a small
tamable predator like the cat around them. Indeed, it has long been debated whether

*   Corresponding author: luca.sineo@unipa.it

                                                                                                  13
                                                                                                                        humans domesticated the cat or whether it was the cat that domesticated humans.
                                                                                                                        Nevertheless, this companionable situation certainly led to the development of an im-
                                                                                                                        portant relationship between humans and cats [4].
Miccichè, Valenti, Messina, Sìneo, Yamaguchi, Catalano, Reale, Cosenza - CAT TAMING IN THE WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN




                                                                                                                           The housecat is the most common pet in the world. Despite its prevalence among
                                                                                                                        humans, debates on the origin of the intimate feline-human bond are still inconclusive
                                                                                                                        and there are many open questions about the cat’s role in the broad process of animal
                                                                                                                        domestication. As every cat owner knows, it is an elusive and unpredictable animal.
                                                                                                                        Their housecat’s mercurial behavior is likewise mirrored in the difficulties in tracing the
                                                                                                                        history of their domestication. For zoo-archaeological researchers, the low incidence
                                                                                                                        of cat remains in archaeological records, and the minor morphological differences be-
                                                                                                                        tween domestic cats and wildcats, constitute the two main obstacles in determining
                                                                                                                        their developmental history. Such conditions make it necessary to employ a broad
                                                                                                                        empirical approach and to examine multiple lines of evidence. After briefly review-
                                                                                                                        ing the current understanding of the cat’s history of domestication, as an example,
                                                                                                                        this paper will present preliminary data from the study of an authentic archaeological
                                                                                                                        specimen. This study, still in progress, especially as regards molecular methods, is a
                                                                                                                        case-report on a multidisciplinary approach to museum sample analysis. The contribu-
                                                                                                                        tion focuses on a cat skull found at a prehistoric Sicilian site. The analyses were based
                                                                                                                        on examination of the morphometric features of the skull and biomolecular analysis of
                                                                                                                        DNA extracted from the bone.

                                                                                                                           2. Brief history of an “atypical” domestication process

                                                                                                                            In examining the origins and dynamics of the domestication of plants and animals,
                                                                                                                        cat taming has remained one of the main issues still to be resolved within the field of
                                                                                                                        prehistoric archaeology. Despite this, questions arose long ago within the theoreti-
                                                                                                                        cal framework of the Neolithic Revolution proposed by Child [5]; the argument is still
                                                                                                                        strongly debated among scholars, testified by the absence of a shared definition of
                                                                                                                        domestication. This is due to the extremely complex nature of the process of animal
                                                                                                                        domestication that avoids a univocal and generalized notion. It is impossible here to
                                                                                                                        examine in detail the multiple definitions of animal domestication, however, it is pos-
                                                                                                                        sible to find shared assumptions that may be useful in locating the cat within the history
                                                                                                                        of animal domestication.
                                                                                                                            Most definitions of animal domestication focus on an analysis of the relationship
                                                                                                                        between biological and cultural components [6-8]. However, despite the fact these two
                                                                                                                        components are present in virtually every scholarly description of animal domestica-
                                                                                                                        tion, there is a wide discrepancy in reference to the role played by each element [9].
                                                                                                                            Many scenarios emphasize the predominance of human intervention and character-
                                                                                                                        ize it as exerting full control over animals, managing reproduction, movement, suste-
                                                                                                                        nance, and shelter [10, 11]. Furthermore, since many theories point out the crucial po-
                                                                                                                        sition of animal domestication in shaping the developing social organization of ancient
                                                                                                                        human societies, the place assigned to animals within these communities is one that
                                                                                                                        sees them as mere objects of possession [12].
                                                                                                                            In opposition to this “utilitarian” view of domestication, other researchers claim a
                                                                                                                        more active role played by animals in the process of domestication. They reject the
                                                                                                                        conceptualization of humans as the unique beneficiaries in the relationship and point
                                                                                                                        out that the animals also benefit, notably in terms of improved reproductive fitness,
                                                                                                                        food supplies and shelter [13].


                                                                                                                   14
    Bökönyi [14] theorizes the dynamics of animal domestication in two phases: a first
phase provides for keeping an animal in captivity for utilitarian purposes, and a sec-
ond, which is a conscious action, is the control over reproduction intended to select
only those individuals that exhibit certain biological and behavioral characteristics. It
is important to note that the cat, for a large part of its history, was confined to the first
phase. This is because, as expressed by the currently large number of phenotypic
variations, complete domestication only took place in the last two hundred years. Fol-
lowing this model in relation to the cat, it would seem more appropriate to speak about
taming rather than domestication [15].
    The latter assumption introduces another shared factor present in almost all defini-
tions of domestication. This common denominator is that the relationship, between
human and non-human animals usually entails both morphological and behavioral
modifications in the animal population [10, 14, 16-18]. These modifications are guided
by the selective pressure of humans and have occured over several generations. For
many years, this particular aspect of domestication has guided researchers, and still
guides them today, in their attribution of a domesticated form and its wild predecessor,
in zoo-archaeological research. Due to the absence of strong morphological differ-
ences between wild and domestic cat types, the hypothesis was put forward of a par-
tial domestication or an “interested” tolerance by humans to semi-wild animals whose
presence was useful in limiting the number of rodents. However, this is still a “utilitar-
ian” point of view which highlights the dominant role of human agency. In the case of
the cat, this dominant role of human agency seems out of place.
    As Diamond [19] stated, when we attempt to determine why certain animals were
domesticated, we not only consider human agency, we also need to examine all be-
havioral and biological features of the animals. Simply put, animals must give their
permission before being domesticated. In referring to the cat, Budiansky [20] goes fur-
ther in his definition and ironically proposes a type of “reverse domestication” process
instigated by cats against humans. Thus the cat, in most of its biological and behav-




                                                                                                     CONSERVATION SCIENCE IN CULTURAL HERITAGE
ioral aspects, is not a species that falls into a “canonical” definition of domestication.
A favorable candidate for domestication generally comes from species in which social
structures are organized in large gregarious groups with a clear hierarchy, are easily
managed and non-aggressive and follow a generally herbivorous or omnivorous diet.
But in examining the cat, we note that it is lacking in all these characteristics. Wildcats
are territorial and solitary, hyper-carnivorous and not easily tamed, even when young.
These conditions are in clear contrast with the enormous success of cats as a domes-
tic species. Looking beyond the lack of qualifications displayed by cats we can refer to
a different theoretical model that instead empathizes aspects of cooperative patterns
played by both human and non-human animals in the domestication process.
    O’Connor [13] points out that instead of researching the goals of humans in control-
ling animals, we should attempt to answer the question of why humans were particularly
attractive to some animals. In regard to the cat’s biological and behavioral characteris-
tics, a model principally based on the expression of a mutual, co-dependent relation-
ship between humans and animals appears better suited than models which take the
“economical” utilitarian use of animals by humans as its main theoretical basis. Such
symbiotic theories balance human agency and put the role of animals’ opportunistic
strategies into the equation. Thus, we can place the phenomenon of cat domestication
into a more suitable theoretical framework, both in accordance with the intrinsic char-
acteristics of this small animal and the historic evidence from the beginning of radical
change in the structure of the earliest human societies during the Neolithic.

                                                                                                15
                                                                                                                            Animal domestication processes took place over different times and in at least ten
                                                                                                                        focal areas of the world [9]. The beginning of a domestication process for most princi-
                                                                                                                        pal domesticated animals finds its earliest archaeological traces in the Near East, and
Miccichè, Valenti, Messina, Sìneo, Yamaguchi, Catalano, Reale, Cosenza - CAT TAMING IN THE WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN




                                                                                                                        can be dated to the middle of the 11th millennium B.P. [21]. This evidence constitutes
                                                                                                                        one of the fundamental elements of the Neolithic Transition, and highlights human
                                                                                                                        adoption of new subsistence strategies. As a consequence, the growth of the human
                                                                                                                        population and the improved control of the evolutionary process through the artificial
                                                                                                                        selection of plants and animals, profoundly shaped almost every natural ecosystem
                                                                                                                        of the planet. However, the Neolithic Transition was not only limited to the human
                                                                                                                        control of plants and animals as a source of food, but involved a totally new concep-
                                                                                                                        tion of the world, where human groups organized in new and diverse ways and the
                                                                                                                        occupation of space took on new social dynamics through cognitive symbolic systems
                                                                                                                        [22]. Therefore, it is difficult to understand the Neolithic Transition without taking into
                                                                                                                        account the symbolic values from an emerging new relationship between humans and
                                                                                                                        animals. This latter assertion is even more true if we take as an example the cat and
                                                                                                                        its strong influence in different branches of human culture as testified by the history of
                                                                                                                        art, literature and religion.
                                                                                                                            It is generally accepted, on the basis of vast and well-defined artistic production,
                                                                                                                        that the Egyptians were the first to adopt cats as pets, consequently identifying Egypt
                                                                                                                        as the “cradle” of the domestic cat during the 2nd millennium B.C.. But in the last few
                                                                                                                        years, riding the wave of new archaeological discoveries and molecular studies, a new
                                                                                                                        scenario has emerged that positions the Near East during the Early Neolithic period as
                                                                                                                        showing the earliest evidence of cat taming.
                                                                                                                            The house cat derives from the polytypic wild species Felis silvetris, which is pre-
                                                                                                                        sent in three inter-fertile subspecies, covering wide geographical areas. They are re-
                                                                                                                        spectively: the subspecies F.s. ornata inhabiting Central Asia and the Middle East;
                                                                                                                        F.s. lybica in the Near East and North Africa; and the subspecies F.s. silvestris found
                                                                                                                        across the whole of Europe. In the last ten years, thanks to advances in biomolecular
                                                                                                                        techniques, numerous studies have focused on the genetic analysis of the cat. Even
                                                                                                                        if the majority of these studies focus on wildcat conservation problems caused by high
                                                                                                                        levels of hybridization between local wildcat populations and free-ranging domestic
                                                                                                                        cats [23-26], recent molecular studies, specifically conducted to reconstruct the phy-
                                                                                                                        logeny of the cat [27, 28], have shed new light on the topic of cat domestication. The
                                                                                                                        research suggests that current house cats seem to derive from the wild subspecies
                                                                                                                        Felis silvestris lybica, which was probably domesticated in the area of the Near East
                                                                                                                        during the Early Neolithic.
                                                                                                                            This ancient DNA data also supports the archaeological evidence that identifies
                                                                                                                        these regions as the center of cat domestication in the early phases of the Neolithic.
                                                                                                                        This is highlighted by evidence from the Cyprus burial site of Shillourokambos [21].
                                                                                                                        Despite Cyprus being in the Mediterranean basin, its proximity to the Anatolian coast
                                                                                                                        and the nature of its material culture, which highlights the presence of clear contacts
                                                                                                                        with, and influences from, the Levant cultures, accord with Cyprus’ inclusion in the
                                                                                                                        macro-geography of the Near East. During the excavation of the Neolithic village of
                                                                                                                        Shillourokambos, a complete cat’s skeleton was found in close association with a hu-
                                                                                                                        man grave. Contextual dating attributed the finds to the Pre-Pottery Neolithic period
                                                                                                                        (9500 BP). In this case it was not necessary to carry out detailed morphometric or
                                                                                                                        molecular analyses of the specimen, because in Cyprus there is no evidence of a pre-
                                                                                                                        existent endemic form of wildcat. Therefore, the simple occurrence of the cat allows


                                                                                                                   16
for allegations that the animal was introduced by humans. Furthermore, this skeleton
is the oldest known archaeological evidence of cat domestication and should be in-
terpreted as the pet of the buried person rather than a simple food offering. Thus, it
provides information regarding the highly symbolic and sentimental value conferred on
the cat in early Levant societies. The discovery of the Cypriot cat could constitute the
starting point for a survey oriented towards finding evidence of an early introduction of
the cat to other Mediterranean Islands possibly in connection with ancient trade routes.

   3. Evidence for the early introduction of the domestic cat in Sicily

   Due to its close proximity to the Italian peninsula, Sicily is a “continental” island
sporadically connected to Italy during glacial peaks, as shown by its continental mam-
mal fauna [29]. Unlike Cyprus, where the only Felis form still living on the island is the
domestic Felis s. catus, currently, both the domestic Felis s. catus and the European
wild subspecies Felis s. silvestris can be found in Sicily. The coexistence of these two
subspecies constitute a further obstacle to identifying when the domestic cat was intro-
duced to Sicily. The presence of a single “generic” form of cat in Sicilian archaeological
records does not provide enough evidence to claim when humans actually introduced
the domestic cat. Therefore, it is necessary to understand whether the oldest osteo-
logical cat specimens recovered belong to a particular subspecies of Felis silvestris or
not. To approach this problem, it is evident then, that different methodologies such as
ancient DNA and morphometric analysis need to be employed.
   Current literature reports the presence of the European wildcat in Sicily from the Up-
per Pleistocene – Holocene Transition [30]. This data comes from the faunal analysis
at a key site of the Mesolithic-Neolithic Transition in Italy: the Uzzo cave near the city
of Trapani [31]. This site is fundamental in understanding the emergence of the domes-
tication process in Sicily, since some of the earliest domesticated species introduced
to the island were recorded here [32]. The first occurrence of cat-related osteological




                                                                                                   CONSERVATION SCIENCE IN CULTURAL HERITAGE
finds came from the Early Neolithic (7000 – 6500 B.P.) layers of the cave, where almost
85 fragments belonging to several cats were found. These remains were interpreted
as the result of hunting and assigned to the wild form Felis s. silvestris [33], though no
specific morphometric or molecular analyses were undertaken.
   Apart from the Uzzo cave, there is only one other Sicilian prehistoric context with the
presence of cat remains. This evidence consists of the fragmentary skull of a cat. During
the recent redesigning of the museum where this find was on display, we had the op-
portunity to study the skull, applying both craniometric and biomolecular approaches to
determine its phylogenetic position as belonging to a specific Felis silvestris subspecies.

   4. Materials and methods

   The specimen examined in this research comes from the excavation of a system of
natural caves in the archaeological area of Stretto Partanna (Trapani). The specimen
was exhibited at the Museum of Partanna (TP).
   Archaeological operations conducted in 2000 by the Regional Heritage office of
Trapani (Soprintendendenza BB.CC.AA.), discovered a polysome burial dated, on the
basis of the grave-site items, to the Eneolithic period (late 3rd millennium B.C.). In
close proximity to the burial ground, in another small cave situated at a lower level with
respect to the grave, a different stratigraphic horizon was investigated. The deposit,


                                                                                              17
                                                                                                                        attributed to the Early Bronze Age (22nd century BCE – 16th century BCE) on the ba-
                                                                                                                        sis of the archaeological materials recovered, revealed a great many interesting finds
                                                                                                                        such as obsidian blades, lithic axes and dipper cups, among which a large bell-shaped
Miccichè, Valenti, Messina, Sìneo, Yamaguchi, Catalano, Reale, Cosenza - CAT TAMING IN THE WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN




                                                                                                                        vase (60 cm high) (Figure 1) stands out as exceptional. Archaeologists interpreted
                                                                                                                        the context as an expression of religious activities related to a cult of water. Inside the
                                                                                                                        large bell-shaped vase, a cat skull was found with other faunal remains (Figure 2). The
                                                                                                                        aim of the survey was to assign this sample to a subspecies of Felis silvestris and,
                                                                                                                        consequently, understand whether it was introduced by humans or if it was the feral
                                                                                                                        form Felis s. silvestris.
                                                                                                                            The morphometric analysis of the skull was set up following current cranial biom-
                                                                                                                        etrics standards [34]. The specimen was highly fragmented and before craniometric
                                                                                                                        analysis began, it was necessary to proceed with complete restoration of the speci-
                                                                                                                        men. To ensure the reversibility of the operation a cellulose nitrate adhesive, soluble
                                                                                                                        in acetone, was used to assemble the fragments. After conservation operations, it was
                                                                                                                        possible to take twenty linear (Figure 3) measurements of the skull through the use
                                                                                                                        of a digital caliper. Ten measurements were used to conduct a discriminant statisti-
                                                                                                                        cal analysis by comparing our specimen to a worldwide database of over 220 items
                                                                                                                        that includes the varieties silvestris, lybica, ornata and catus. Statistical analysis was
                                                                                                                        performed using the software package Statistica (StatSoft, Tulsa, USA). Taking into
                                                                                                                        account the preservation (conditions) of our specimen, only the shared variables were
                                                                                                                        considered. The data was processed in an Exploratory Statistical Analysis (EDA). Mul-
                                                                                                                        tivariate techniques such as principal component analysis, discriminant analysis and
                                                                                                                        single linkage cluster analysis were performed.
                                                                                                                            To investigate the relationship of our specimen with domestic cats and wild progeni-
                                                                                                                        tors, we selected mtDNA polymorphisms that were known to be variable and informa-
                                                                                                                        tive [27]. A skull fragment was prepared using appropriate ancient DNA techniques
                                                                                                                        (Golden criteria) [35], and DNA was extracted using a Charge Switch Forensic DNA
                                                                                                                        Purification Kit (Invitrogen). The extracted DNA was analyzed by polymerase chain re-
                                                                                                                        action (PCR), and PCR amplifications were performed with three sets of mitochondrial
                                                                                                                        primers. Multiple negative extraction and amplification controls were included in each
                                                                                                                        PCR reaction to detect eventual contamination. The primers used were: cytb1: Fw
                                                                                                                        5’-TCGAAAATCACACCCCCTTA-3’,Rv 5’-CCTAGAAGGGAGCCGAAGTT-3’ cytb2:
                                                                                                                        Fw        5’-CGGCTCCCTTCTAGGAGTCT-3’,Rv5’-GCGACAGATGTGGGTAACTG-3’;
                                                                                                                        ND5:Fw 5’-ACTCAAACGCATGGGACTTC-3’, Rv5’-AATTGGGCGGATTTACCTGT-3’.
                                                                                                                        All PCR reactions were performed using AmpliTaqGold (Applied Biosystems). The ini-
                                                                                                                        tial steps were: denaturation at 94°C for 10 minutes followed by 50 cycles of 45 sec-
                                                                                                                        onds at 94°C, 60 seconds annealing at 50-53°C and 60 seconds elongation at 72°C
                                                                                                                        with final extension of 10 minutes at 72°C. The double stranded PCR products were
                                                                                                                        run on 2 % low melting agarose gels to determine whether PCR was successful. Posi-
                                                                                                                        tive bands were purified using Gel Band Purification Kit (illustra) and sequenced using
                                                                                                                        the Big Dye Terminator system (Applied Biosystems Inc.). Extension products were
                                                                                                                        purified and resolved on an ABI 3700 sequencer. Gene identity was established by
                                                                                                                        comparison to homology in GenBank using BLAST 2.2.




                                                                                                                   18
Figure 1. The large bell-shaped vase and highlighted in the large square, the cat’s skull.




                                                                                                  CONSERVATION SCIENCE IN CULTURAL HERITAGE




              Figure 2. The Stretto Partanna specimen after conservation.




                                                                                             19
Miccichè, Valenti, Messina, Sìneo, Yamaguchi, Catalano, Reale, Cosenza - CAT TAMING IN THE WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN




                                                                                                                        Figure 3. Morphometric skull characters, measured skull variables are underscored in red
                                                                                                                        (modified from Yamaguchi [34]; Platz et al. [37]).


                                                                                                                           5. Results and discussion

                                                                                                                           Measurements resulting from morphometric examination were previously submit-
                                                                                                                        ted to standardization Q-mode in order to express only morphological information.
                                                                                                                        We calculated D² distances with an unbiased estimator to correct biased results and
                                                                                                                        misinterpretations [36]. We then used discriminant analysis to compare the Stretto
                                                                                                                        Partanna cat with four groups: silvestris, lybica, ornata and catus. The scatter plot
                                                                                                                        (Figure 4) showed the first two components as 93.2% of the variance (63.74% and
                                                                                                                        29.50%), highlighting along the positive side of the first component a clear similarity of
                                                                                                                        the Stretto Partanna cat to Felis silvestris silvestris. This result allowed us to classify
                                                                                                                        our sample as the local wild form of cat and to exclude the possibility of introduction by
                                                                                                                        humans. However, the craniometrics data are in sharp contrast with the results of the
                                                                                                                        biomolecular analysis detailed below.
                                                                                                                           Despite the impossibility of obtaining sequences for the mitocondrial polimorphic
                                                                                                                        locus ND5, we successfully sequenced two cytocrome b fragments. The finding of
                                                                                                                        haplotype 15082T- 15164T, not present in European wildcats, seems to indicate, in
                                                                                                                        contrast to what the morphometric analysis showed that our specimen is not a wildcat
                                                                                                                        of European origin. Hence, we might hypothesize that it was a tamed animal brought
                                                                                                                        to Sicily perhaps from the Levant. From the beginning of the 2nd millennium B.C. Sicily
                                                                                                                        was fully incorporated into Mediterranean trade routes, as testified by the presence of
                                                                                                                        Aegean, Levantine and Cypriot pottery in many Sicilian Bronze Age sites.
                                                                                                                           The discrepancies shown by the craniometrics data which designated our sample
                                                                                                                        as a European wild cat could be biased, not only due to the well-known morphological
                                                                                                                        similarity among cat subspecies, but also because of the coexistence of two inter-


                                                                                                                   20
Figure 4. The scatter plot of the first two components as 93.2% of the variance (63.74% and
29.50%) highlight similarity of the Stretto Partanna cat to Felis silvestris silvestris.

fertile forms in Sicily, that could have produced a high level of introgression resulting
in hybrid forms. In this case, it would be improbable to expect a clear morphometric
distinction between the wild and domestic form of cat [39].
   Once again the cat has displayed its elusive attributes. However, despite the fact that
these preliminary analyses leave the debate on the early introduction of the domestic cat in
Sicily inconclusive, these are promising results that encourage us to continue with further
studies, and with the aim to investigate a chronology and approach to cat domestication in
prehistoric Sicily and in the Western Mediterranean Basin. Furthermore, these preliminary
results highlight the necessity to proceed with systematic revisions and radiometric dating
of all Sicilian faunal assemblages where the presence of cat remains is recorded.




                                                                                                     CONSERVATION SCIENCE IN CULTURAL HERITAGE
      Acknowledgements

   Authors are particularly grateful to Lee Ambrozy for proofreading the English text
and for her valuable suggestions which greatly improved the paper. Thanks go to Fran-
co Palla and Sebastiano Tusa for advice and suggestions and to Andrew C. Kitchener
for sharing the craniometric data of the Felis silvestris silvestris.
   RM is supported by Research Grant PON It@ca Project: “Metodi innovativo speri-
mentali su base interdisciplinare (biologica – chimica fisica) per la valutazione del sis-
tema: bene culturale – ambiente – biota”, Università di Palermo.


      References

[1]     Brown, T.A., (1999) How ancient DNA may help in understanding the origin and
        spread of agriculture, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 354, pp. 89-98.
[2]     Beja-Pereira, A., Caramelli, D., Lalueza-Fox, C., Vernesi, C., Ferrand, N., Casoli,
        A., Goyache, F., Royo, L.R., Conti, S., Lari, M., Martini, A., Ouragh, L., Magid, A.,
        Atash, A., Zsolnai, A., Boscato, P., Triantaphylidis, C., Ploumi, K., Sineo, L., Mal-
        legni, F., Taberlet, P., Erhardt, G., Sampietro, L., Bertranpetit, J., Barbujani, G.,
        Luikart, G., Bertorelle, G., (2006) The origin of European cattle: Evidence from
        modern and ancient DNA, PNAS, 103(21), pp. 8113-8118.
                                                                                                21
                                                                                                                        [3]    Hofreiter, M., (2011) Drafting Human Ancestry: What Does the Neanderthal Ge-
                                                                                                                               nome Tell Us about Hominid Evolution? Commentary on Green et al. (2010),
                                                                                                                               Human Biology, 83(1), pp. 1-11.
Miccichè, Valenti, Messina, Sìneo, Yamaguchi, Catalano, Reale, Cosenza - CAT TAMING IN THE WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN




                                                                                                                        [4]    Hu, Y., Hu, S., Wang, W., Wu, X., Marshall, F.B., Chen, X., Hou, L., Wang, C.,
                                                                                                                               (2014) Earliest evidence for commensal processes of cat domestication, PNAS,
                                                                                                                               111(1), p. 117.
                                                                                                                        [5]    Childe, V.G., (1928) The Most Ancient East: The Oriental Prelude to European
                                                                                                                               Prehistory, Kegan Paul, London.
                                                                                                                        [6]    Clutton-Brock, J., (1992) The process of domestication, Mammal Review, 22, 79-85.
                                                                                                                        [7]    Crabtree, P.J., (1993) Early animal domestication in the Middle East and Europe.
                                                                                                                               In: Schiffer M.B. (ed.), Archaeological method and theory, Vol. 5. University of
                                                                                                                               Arizona Press, pp. 201-245.
                                                                                                                        [8]    Meadow, R.H., (1989) Osteological evidence for the process of animal domesti-
                                                                                                                               cation. In: Clutton-Brock J. (ed.), The walking larder: Patterns of domestication,
                                                                                                                               pastoralism, and predation. London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 80-90.
                                                                                                                        [9]    Zeder, M.A., (2006) Central Questions in the Domestication of Plants and Ani-
                                                                                                                               mals, Evolutionary Anthropology, 15(3), pp. 105-117.
                                                                                                                        [10]   Clutton-Brock, J., (1994) The unnatural world: Behavioural aspects of humans and
                                                                                                                               animals in the process of domestication. In: Manning A., Serpell J.A. (eds.), Ani-
                                                                                                                               mals and human society: Changing perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 23-35.
                                                                                                                        [11]   Bökönyi, S., (1989) Definitions of domestication. In: Clutton-Brock J. (ed.), The
                                                                                                                               walking larder: patterns of domestication, pastoralism, and predation. Cam-
                                                                                                                               bridge: Unwin, pp. 1-4.
                                                                                                                        [12]   Ducos, P., (1978) Domestication defined and methodological approaches to
                                                                                                                               its recognition in faunal assemblages. In: Meadow RH, Zeder MA, (eds.), Ap-
                                                                                                                               proaches to faunal analysis in the Middle East. Peabody Museum Bulletin 2. MA:
                                                                                                                               Harvard University, Cambridge, pp. 49-52.
                                                                                                                        [13]   O’Connor, T.P., (1997) Working at relationships: Another look at animal domesti-
                                                                                                                               cation, Antiquity, 71, pp. 149-156.
                                                                                                                        [14]   Bökönyi, S., (1969) Archaeological problems and methods of recognizing animal
                                                                                                                               domestication. In: Ucko P.J., Dimbleby G.W. (eds.), The domestication and ex-
                                                                                                                               ploitation of plants and animals. Chicago: Aldine Publishing, pp. 219-229.
                                                                                                                        [15]   Driscoll, C.A., Clutton-Brock, J., Kitchener, A.C., O’Brien, S.J., (2009) The Tam-
                                                                                                                               ing of the Cat, Genetic and archaeological findings hint that wildcats became
                                                                                                                               housecats earlier-and in a different place--than previously thought, Scientific
                                                                                                                               American, 300(6), pp. 68-75.
                                                                                                                        [16]   Harris, D.R., (1996) Domesticatory relationships of people, plants and animals.
                                                                                                                               In: Ellen R.F., Fukui K. (eds.), Redefining nature: Ecology, culture and domesti-
                                                                                                                               cation. Oxford: Berg, pp. 437-463.
                                                                                                                        [17]   Hesse, B.C., (1984) These are our goats: The origins of herding in west central
                                                                                                                               Iran. In: Clutton-Brock J., Grigson C. (eds.), Animals and archaeology: 3. Early
                                                                                                                               herders and their flocks, British Archaeological Reports, International Series 202.
                                                                                                                               Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, pp. 243-264.
                                                                                                                        [18]   Ingold, T., (1980) Hunters, pastoralists, and ranchers: Reindeer economies and
                                                                                                                               their transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
                                                                                                                        [19]   Diamond, J., (2002) Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal
                                                                                                                               domestication, Nature, 418, pp. 700-707.
                                                                                                                        [20]   Budiansky, S., (1992) The Covenant of the wild: Why animals chose domestica-
                                                                                                                               tion. New York: William Morrow & Co.

                                                                                                                   22
[21] Vigne, J.D., Carrère, I., Briois, F., Guilaine, J., (2011) The Early Process of Mammal
     Domestication in the Near East, Current Anthropology, 52(S4), pp. S255-S271.
[22] Helmer, D., Gourichon, L., Stordeur, D., (2004) À L’aube de La Domestication
     Animale. Imaginaire et Symbolisme Animal Dans Les Premières Sociétés Néo-
     lithiques Du Nord Du Proche-Orient, Anthropozoologica, 39(1), pp. 143-163.
[23] Daniels, M.J., Beaumont, M.A., Johnson, P.J., Balharry, D., Macdonald, D.W.,
     Barratt, E., (2001) Ecology and genetics of wild-living cats in the north-east of
     Scotland and the implications for the conservation of the wildcat, Journal of Ap-
     plied Ecology, 38, pp. 146-161.
[24] Reig, S., Daniels, M.J., Macdonald, D.W., (2001), Craniometric Differentiation
     Within Wild-Living Cats in Scotland Using 3D Morphometrics, Journal of Zool-
     ogy, 253, pp. 121-133.
[25] Randi, E., Pierpaoli, M., Beaumont, M., Ragni, B., Sforzi, A., (2001) Genetic
     Identification of Wild and Domestic Cats (Felis Silvestris) and Their Hybrids Us-
     ing Bayesian Clustering Methods, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 18(9), pp.
     1679-1693.
[26] Pierpaoli, M., Biro, Z.S., Herrmann, M., Hupe, K., Fernandes, M., Ragni, B., Sze-
     methy, L., Randi, E., (2003) Genetic Distinction of Wildcat (Felis Silvestris) Popu-
     lations in Europe, and Hybridization with Domestic Cats in Hungary, Molecular
     Ecology, 12(10), pp. 2585–2598.
[27] Driscoll, C.A., Menotti-Raymond, M., Roca, A.L., Hupe, K., Johnson, W.E., Gef-
     fen, E., Harley, E.H., Delibes, M., Pontier, D., Kitchener, A.C., Yamaguchi, N.,
     O’Brien, S.J., Macdonald, D.W. (2007) The Near Eastern Origin of Cat Domesti-
     cation, Science, 317(5837), pp. 519-523.
[28] O’Brien, S.J., Stephen, J., Warren, J., Driscoll, C.A., Pontius, J., Pecon-Slattery,
     J., Menotti-Raymond, M., (2008) State of Cat Genomics, Trends in Genetics :
     TIG, 24(6), pp. 268-79.
[29] Bonfiglio, L., Mangano, G., Marra, A.C., Masini, F., Pavia, M., Petruso, D., (2002)




                                                                                                   CONSERVATION SCIENCE IN CULTURAL HERITAGE
     Pleistocene Calabrian and Sicilian bioprovinces, Geobios Special Memoires, 24,
     pp. 29-39.
[30] Sommer, R.S., Benecke, N., (2006) Late Pleistocene and Holocene Develop-
     ment of the Felid Fauna (Felidae) of Europe: a Review, Journal of Zoology,
     269(1), pp. 7-19.
[31] Piperno, M., Scali, S., Tagliacozzo, A., (1980) Mesolitico e neolitico alla Grotta
     dell’Uzzo (Trapani). Primi dati per un’interpretazione paleoeconomica, Quater-
     naria, 22, 275-300.
[32] Malone, C., (2003) The Italian Neolithic: A Synthesis of Research, Journal of
     World Prehistory, 17(3), pp. 235-312.
[33] Tagliacozzo, A., (2005) Animal Exploitation in the Early Neolithic in Central-
     Southern Italy, Munibe, Antropologia-Arkeologia, 57, pp. 429-439.
[34] Yamaguchi, N., Driscoll, C.A., (2004) Craniological Differentiation Between Eu-
     ropean Wildcats (Felis Silvestris Silvestris), African Wildcats (F. S. Lybica) and
     Asian Wildcats (F. S. Ornata): Implications for Their Evolution and Conservation,
     Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 83, pp. 47-63.
[35] Cooper, A., Poinar, H.N., (2000) Ancient DNA: Do it right or not at all, Science,
     289, p. 1139.
[36] van Vark, G.N., Schaafsma, W., (1992) Advances in the quantitative analysis of
     skeletal morphology. In: Saunders S.R., Katzenberg M.A. (eds.), Skeletal Biol-
     ogy of Past Peoples: Research Methods. New York: Wiley-Liss, pp. 225-257.

                                                                                              23
                                                                                                                        [37] Platz, S.S., Hertwig, T., Jetschke, G., Krüger, M., Fischer, M.S., (2011) Com-
                                                                                                                             parative Morphometric Study of the Slovakian Wildcat Population (Felis Silvestris
                                                                                                                             Silvestris): Evidence for a Low Rate of Introgression?, Mammalian Biology –
Miccichè, Valenti, Messina, Sìneo, Yamaguchi, Catalano, Reale, Cosenza - CAT TAMING IN THE WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN




                                                                                                                             Zeitschrift Für Säugetierkunde, 76(2), pp. 222-233.
                                                                                                                        [38] Driscoll, C.A., Macdonald, D.W., O’Brien, S.J., (2009) From wild animals to do-
                                                                                                                             mestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication. In: Proceedings of the Na-
                                                                                                                             tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, pp. 9971-9978.
                                                                                                                        [39] O’Connor, T., (2007) Wild or domestic? Biometric variation in the cat Felis silves-
                                                                                                                             tris Schreber, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 595, pp. 581-595.


                                                                                                                          Biographical notes


                                                                                                                        Roberto Miccichè, Osteoarchaeologist, Honorary Fellow of Anthropology at the Uni-
                                                                                                                          versity of Palermo.
                                                                                                                        Pietro Valenti, Zooarchaeologist and Speleologist, Honorary Fellow of Anthropology
                                                                                                                           at the University of Palermo.
                                                                                                                        Andrea D. Messina, PhD in Animal Biology at the University of Palermo.
                                                                                                                        Giulio Catalano, PhD in Anthropology at the University of Bologna, Ravenna.
                                                                                                                        Luca Sìneo, Full Professor of Anthropology at the University of Palermo.
                                                                                                                        Noboyuki Yamaguchi, Associate Professor of Animal Ecology in the Department of
                                                                                                                          Biological and Environmental Sciences at the College of Arts & Sciences at the
                                                                                                                          University of Doha in Qatar.
                                                                                                                        Stefano Reale, Senior researcher at the molecular biology unit, Istituto Zooprofilattico
                                                                                                                          Sperimentale di Sicilia.
                                                                                                                        Mario Cosenza, Biologist at the molecular biology unit, Istituto Zooprofilattico Speri-
                                                                                                                          mentale di Sicilia.




                                                                                                                   24
    Summary
    The vast wealth of cultural artifacts and ancient biological samples can today be in-
vestigated using a great variety of methods and technologies. The result is a growing
diffusion of studies on DNA, isotopes and morphometrics, and the exponential growth of
publications and bio-archaeological discoveries of inestimable value for different areas
of interpretation, such as phylogeny, history and archaeology. This paper describes the
morphological and molecular study of a rare specimen of Felis from an Early Bronze
Age horizon. The report offers the opportunity for a brief discussion on cat taming, on
the origin of this practice and on the archaeological importance of this specimen for the
reconstruction of taming practices in the Western Mediterranean Basin.


    Riassunto
    Il vasto patrimonio culturale di manufatti e di reperti biologici antichi può attualmen-
te essere investigato con molte metodologie e tecnologie. Ne deriva una crescente
diffusione di studi sul aDNA, isotopici e morfogeometrici e una crescita esponenziale
delle pubblicazioni e dei risultati bio-archeologici di inestimabile valore per ambiti inter-
pretativi diversi, filogenetici, storici, archeologici. Il presente lavoro descrive uno studio
morfologico e molecolare di un raro reperto di Felis proveniente da un orizzonte del
Bronzo Antico. Il report offre per altro l’occasione per una breve disamina sull’addome-
sticamento del gatto, la provenienza di tale pratica e sull’importanza zooarcheologica
della relazione con Homo nel Mediterraneo occidentale.




                                                                                                      CONSERVATION SCIENCE IN CULTURAL HERITAGE




                                                                                                 25
