<h1>Yi-Ping Ong, <em>The Art of Being: Poetics of the Novel and Existentialists Philosophy</em></h1>
10.13125/2039-6597/4121
Recensione di The Art of Being: Poetics of the Novel and Existentialists Philosophy di Yi-Ping Ong.
application/pdf
2039-6597
4121
19
en
Alberto Comparini
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Between
poetics
Yi-Ping Ong, <i> The Art of Being: Poetics of the Novel and Existentialists Philosophy <i>
Text.Serial.Journal
https://ojs.unica.it/index.php/between
10
Between the Texts/Reviews: Ed. Giulio Iacoli, Beatrice Seligardi, Claudia Cao
2020-05-30
2020-05-20
2020-05-30
2020-05-30
572-579
1
Alberto Comparini
2020/05/30
10.13125/2039-6597/4121
572
University of Trento, Italy
2039-6597
19
poetics
en
579
Yi-Ping Ong, <i> The Art of Being: Poetics of the Novel and Existentialists Philosophy <i>
https://ojs.unica.it/index.php/between/article/download/4121/3753
10
                 Yi-Ping Ong
               The Art of Being:
   Poetics of the Novel and Existentialists
                  Philosophy

    Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2018, 298 pp.
      At the very end of Literature, Theory, and Common Sense (Princeton,
Princeton University Press, 2004 [1998]), the French literary scholar and
intellectual Antoine Compagnon writes that «to study literature, you
must take sides, decide on an approach, for the various methods do not
complement each other and eclecticism leads nowhere. The critical
stance, the knowledge of problematic hypotheses that govern our
procedures, is vital» (2004: 197). Compagnon takes on the demon of
theory from a philosophical perspective – a perspective that within the
American, analytic philosophical tradition is commonly associated with
so-called ‘critical theory’. To be brief, even at the cost of generalizing for
the sake of argument, usually, in the United States, contemporary
Western philosophers are studied by literary theorists in comparative
literature, English, and modern language programs: just to give a couple
of notable examples, Jacques Derrida is usually associated with French
Theory, whereas Giorgio Agamben is part of the recent, yet promising
and significant, Italian Thought trend. On the other hand, in American
Philosophy Departments, it is rare to find undergraduate or even
graduate classes on Derrida’s De la grammatologie (1967) or Agamben’s
Homo sacer (1995), not to mention Martin Heidegger and other
existentialist or phenomenological thinkers—which is probably a good
thing.
      Comparative literature scholars trained in the U.S. tend – I have to
say, quite successfully – to work on comparative, global, and literary


Between, vol. X, n. 19 (Maggio/ May 2020)
                                          Between, vol. X, n. 19 (Maggio/May 2020)



theoretical issues from this ‘critical’ orientation: a recent, though ‘old’
example, is Jonathan Culler’s Theory of the Lyric (2015), whose main
argument on the Western lyric poetry tradition is rooted within the
debate around deconstruction that happened between the late 1960s and
the early 1980s; Derrida and De Man, among others, were and are still
perceived by Culler as primarily literary theory scholars, whose works
embrace formal and aesthetic elements of literary discourse, which
allowed him to develop his own ‘apostrophe’ theory to describe the
transhistorical and performative nature of lyric poetry.
      On the opposite side stands Yi-Ping Ong’s The Art of Being. Poetics
of the Novel and Existentialist Philosophy: her critical stance, to use
Compagnon’s words, resides within the intersection between the
continental and the analytic philosophical traditions, in that her
theoretical account of the novel aims to establish an aesthetic and ethical
relationship between literature and existentialism to outline an
existentialist poetics of realism in the novel that «makes possible to
discern and ascribe critical importance to various strategies for
portraying characterological freedom, worldhood, and detotalized
aesthetic form» (237).
      Compared to previous attempts at establishing a relation between
literature and existentialist philosophy by means of thematic and
allegorical themes (death, human freedom, angst), or through a
description of how philosophy influenced an author’s thought – not to
mention philological and intertextual exercises with philosophical
writers, such as Sartre and Camus – Ong’s book is original both in terms
of methodology as well as in terms of close and ‘distant’ readings, for
she is specifically concerned with the philosophical significance of
specific forms, modes, and genres. By «developing an account of the
impact of [existentialist philosophers’] discovery upon our
understanding of the form of the novel and of the narrative strategies»,
Ong studies how «novels draw their readers into the fictional reality of
the lives and worlds they represent» (23) by seeking to answer two
correlated questions: what is a novel? and what can a novel do? Her
goal, therefore, does not only pertain the domain of literary criticism, in
which her book stands as a groundbreaking piece of scholarship, but


                                                                              573
Yi-Ping Ong, The Art of Being (Alberto Comparini)



also – and foremost – in the domain of ethical discourse, for her
understanding of the novel by means of existentialist philosophy
considers narrative form as a privileged channel of self-knowledge and
understanding of the world: «The Art of Being […] recasts the
problematization of aesthetic totalization from the perspective of the
demands of first-person authority over existence, thus addressing from
a new perspective an aspect of novelistic poetics that has long been
debated» (34).
      If, on the one hand, human existence is understood by means of
literary forms, likewise, literary forms are understood from the point of
view of existence: «Only by unfolding the implications of this encounter
do we discover the power of literary form to shape philosophical
expression» (242). Ong’s project revolves around an enrichment of the
dialectic between existentialism and realism that has characterized
much of the theory of the novel of the twentieth and twenty-first century
(«from Auerbach to Lukács to Mazzoni», 241). Ong’s book requires a
deep knowledge of the current theoretical debates around the novel in
order to understand what her horizons are and where this book is
located, for a chapter – or a long section – dedicated to this topic is
missing, especially in the introductory part. I am particularly
sympathetic to the continental tradition to which Ong refers (Erich
Auerbach, György Lukács, and Guido Mazzoni, but also Franco
Moretti), but the theory of the novel from the 1960s to today has
developed models that, though not always convincing (and sometimes
overly politically ideologized), would have deserved a greater
discussion or problematization in the book—which Ong sometimes
does, though not consistently. On the other hand, The Art of Being is a
book for an audience of specialists, and this lack certainly does not
undermine the overall value of Ong’s work.
      If, as explained so far, her theoretical account and methodology are
highly innovative and offer a new perspective on literary forms (not
merely on the novel alone), her close readings display the intertwined
aspects of the novelistic work of art: the existential, philosophical, and
aesthetic. The philosophers at the core of The Art of Being are, among
others, Søren Kierkegaard, Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, Martin


574
                                          Between, vol. X, n. 19 (Maggio/May 2020)



Heidegger, and Albert Camus, whose works are central for the
philosophical investigation of the novel and its aesthetic and formal
development between the 19th and the 20th century, specifically in the
works of Jane Austen, Emily Brontë, Gustave Flaubert, George Eliot,
Henry James, Émile Zola, and Lev Tolstoy. From this list, which names
only some of the figures along the complex spectrum of literary,
theoretical, and philosophical texts tackled by Ong, it is clear that The
Art of Being does not try to trace a genetic relationship between literature
and philosophy, but rather aims to verify how the dialectic between
literary thought and philosophical thought between the 19th and 20th
centuries allows us to understand the immersive power of classic realist
novels.
      Building from Kierkegaard’s From the Papers of One Still Living,
Published against His Will, Sartre’s François Mauriac and Freedom, and
Beauvoir’s Literature and Metaphysics, in chapter 1 (Toward an
Existentialist Poetics of the Novel), Ong develops her argument around the
notion of what she calls the «life-view» of the novelist and around the
aesthetic elements of novelistic representations (characterological
freedom and self-consciousness). Although the chapter follows a quite
mechanical analysis (Kierkegaard, Sartre, and Beauvoir), Ong’s aesthetic
understanding of the form of the novel successfully merges each account
of the existentialist structure of narration by those philosophers around
one main philosophical paradox: that, at the same time, the novel must
«establish its manifest autonomy qua artwork» and «convince the reader
of the independent existence of its characters, to the point that the
aesthetic boundary separating reader from novel virtually vanishes,
giving rise to the effect of immersive inhabitation within the fictional
reality of the characters’ lives and world» (90). According to Ong,
therefore, the existence of the novel itself depends upon «the fiction of
the nonexistence of the novel’s reader» (17).
      In the nineteenth-century novel – but one may argue that it is
equally true within the entire novel tradition – this philosophical
paradox provokes readers to actively react to the realist lives that these
novel represent, to the point that they create a new perspective on
fictional worlds that is «completely other than the perspective that we


                                                                              575
Yi-Ping Ong, The Art of Being (Alberto Comparini)



ordinarily have upon what is represented» (192). That is: in realist
novels, the above-mentioned philosophical paradox becomes both
aesthetic and epistemic – which is also a dimension that readers
experience within the modernist tradition. Though chapter one
organizes the overall structure of the book of the following three
chapters around this constant dialectic between aesthetic and epistemic,
historically it fails to fully explain how this philosophical paradox differs
(if it does) from the post-19th century novel tradition, which at a point
Ong calls ‘existential’: as she writes, «This brief and schematic outline of
the history of the incomplete in aesthetic thought prior to modernism
can thus be divided into three phases: classical, Romantic, and
existential» (205).
       Nonetheless, this lack of historical comprehension of literary forms,
which is the risk of any interdisciplinary understanding of artwork, does
not at all undermine Ong’s argument concerning the 19th-century novel.
In chapters 2, 3 and 4, Ong exhaustively examines the relation between
the novel and philosophy through the novel’s representation of
freedom, worldhood, and detotalized aesthetic form. What is most
interesting in this respect is the correlation she draws between narrative
tools and philosophical concepts within the aesthetic domain, for the
«very possibility of the novel achieving the status of a convincing work
of art depends upon the resolution of the problem» (151): freedom and
marriage (chapter 2); situations and being-in-the-world (chapter 3);
unfinished narratives and unfinished thought (chapter 4). Both the
narrative tools and the philosophical concepts work towards a better
understanding of 19th-century European literature in terms of aesthetic
and forms, but they also function as stylistic clues for Ong in order to
offer a new account of the type of novel she works on.
       As she claims in chapter 2, «in the encounter between
characterological freedom and the calculated destiny of plot, one must
dominate: either the progress of the narrative is determined by the
contingency of individual free choice, or the fiction of individual agency
is merely a narrative pawn to be discarded once the ultimate plot
structure is established in its entirety» (92). To which follows the
question: what is the meaning of Isabel’s choice in The Portrait of a Lady?


576
                                          Between, vol. X, n. 19 (Maggio/May 2020)



Through Kierkegaard’s Either/Or (1843), Stages on Life’s Way (1845), and
Concluding Unscientific Postscript (1846), Ong elucidates a series of
dialectical shifts that generate narrative structure, which so far have
been either ignored or overlooked in James’s novel. In this sense, agency
and selfhood are expressions of Isabel’s single commitment that readers
are called to acknowledge in their reading and progressive
understanding of the plot: «How can an aesthetic representation
convince the reader of the reality of a ‘particular point of view on the
world and on oneself»—how can it convey, without falsification, the
existential condition of ‘unfinalizability’ in which the authority of self-
knowledge rests?» (101).
      In other words: What does it mean, again, to choose and how does
Isabel’s agency affect us? Or, to pick up another decisive philosophical
question that is at the core of chapter 3, can the world-disclosure in the
realist novel can be understood as an achievement of the novelistic work
of art by which a world is paradoxically rendered comprehensible to a
nonexisting subject from the point of view of an existing subject within»?
(153). How does the being-in-the-world of the novel impact the existence
of Elizabeth in Pride and Prejudice and, so to speak, our reader-response
to her actions? And, finally: what does it mean «to understand one’s own
life as a work in progress» (193) in Balzac’s Œuvre?
      These issues are central to both existentialist thought and the novel,
and this set of philosophical questions expands and to some extent
overcomes what literary theory aims to do in order to respond to the
narrative and theoretical elements raised by the novel: a philosophical
understanding of narrative theory (plot) and forms (characters), as well
as totality (the representation of modern life) by means of existentialism,
unveils «insights into the philosophical meaning and aesthetic aims of
novelistic conventions for portraying existence, reorienting us to aspects
of novelistic form that dominant paradigms of realism pass over» (236).
In Isabel’s decision to marry Osmond or Dorothea’s to marry Will
Ladislaw, the ethical commitment goes beyond the ethically and socially
conventional manifestations of duty in the eyes of both characters and
readers; the actions become, indeed, an ethical stage of self-affirmation,
a form of freedom as an autonomy of the will that defines the epistemic


                                                                              577
Yi-Ping Ong, The Art of Being (Alberto Comparini)



horizon of 19th-century realist novels and lays the foundations for the
genre’s modernist evolution in the early twentieth century.
      A similar condition comes to be when the range of action of the
character is read through its existence in the novelistic world in relation
to our own existence in the world, for «the world of the novel is both a
world as seen and experienced by an ‘other-self’ (the character, not the
reader qua concrete center of agency) and a world viewed by Nobody
(the reader-made-believer in the reality of the character, no longer
herself existing)» (153), so that the trope of entering into another world
would give meaning and existence to the narrative situations
experienced by Elizabeth Bennett in Pride and Prejudice. Finally,
incompleteness – the Dasein’s «lack of totality» (202) – is displayed in the
existentialist meditation on the unfinished form of our lives in the work
of art, when, for example, Austin’s Emma understands on a meta-
narrative level that she has no authority to determine her or another
person’s life choices.
      Where does this lead us? Where do we stand as readers towards
this existential reading of 19th-century realist novels? More could be said
about the comparative maps Ong built through the book and about the
relationship she established between aesthetic, narrative, and
philosophical categories, especially for the ways in which she considers
stricto sensu existential and/or existentialist authors such as Kierkegaard
and Heidegger. At any case, what Art of Being brilliantly does is to
challenge literary criticism and shed light on a new methodology in
order to understand literary texts, genre theory and aesthetic forms: «by
unfolding the implications of the encounter [between literature and
philosophy] we discover the power of literary form to shape
philosophical expression» (242).




578
                                             Between, vol. X, n. 19 (Maggio/May 2020)




                                  L’autore
Alberto Comparini

       Alberto Comparini (Ph.D., Stanford University) è ricercatore di
Critica letteraria e letterature comparate all’Università degli Studi di
Trento, dove si occupa di poesia lirica e di teoria del romanzo. Tra le sue
principali pubblicazioni ricordiamo le monografie La poetica dei «Dialoghi
con Leucò» di Cesare Pavese (Mimesis 2017, premio Pavese 2018), Geocritica
e poesia dell’esistenza (Mimesis 2018) e Un genere letterario in diacronia.
Forme e metamorfosi del dialogo nel Novecento (Fiorini 2018), e la curatela
Ovid’s Metamorphoses in Twentieth-Century Italian Literature (Winter
Verlag 2018).

      Email: alberto.comparini@unitn.it



                              La recensione
Data invio: 09/04/2020
Data accettazione: 20/04/2020
Data pubblicazione: 30/05/2020



                  Come citare questa recensione
Comparini, Alberto, “Yi-Ping Ong, The Art of Being: Poetics of the Novel
and Existentialists Philosophy”, Le culture del dissenso in Europa nella seconda
metà del Novecento, Eds. C. Pieralli - T. Spignoli, Between, X.19
(2020), www.betweenjournal.it




                                                                                 579
