title: Il canale Arte e Sky

author: NeuRoTiX

text:
Il 27 Set 2004, 10:37,
oi...@libero.it
 (Antonio) ha scritto:
> Ho in casa lo Skybox con codisica NDS e il Goldbox con la scheda seca non
> attiva.
Condoglianze...
> Ho poi leto della polemica tra Abbado e Sky, con il primo che denuncia il
> fatto che Sky impedisce agli italiani di ricevere ARTE.
Queste mi mancano... dove le hai lette?

> Sembra che SKY abbia risposto che ARTE non č visualizzabile sullo Skybox
in
> quanto non trasmette su Hotbird.
Eh?
Probabilmente la discussione in questione e' avvenuta - se non erro - prima
del 17 Settembre (o comunque prima di Settembre) ovvero quando Arte su
Hotbird era disponibile solo sul trasponder a 11060 MHz che, avendo un
Symbol Rate di 6510, non e' sintonizzabile su Goldbox, Skybox e abomini
simili... fondamentalmente era come se non esistesse per i possessori dei
suddetti decoder.
Ma da meta' Settembre Arte e' sintonizzabile sui 11623 MHz pol.V dove
abbiamo un Symbol Rate di 27500 (uno dei due supportati dagli *box)... il
trasponder e' lo stesso di alcuni canali porno, Tele Padania e qualche altro
canale italiano (cartomanzia, Hit Channel, ecc.).
> Ma se č vero che non trasmette su Hotbird, com'č che io riesco a vederlo
con
> un Goldbox puntato su Hotbird?
Perche' con il Goldbox hai sintonizzato la versione a 11623 MHz... prova a
fare la stessa cosa (sempre se ci riesci) con lo Skybox.
> Il fatto che Sky non abbia interesse al fatto che gli italiani riescano a
> ricevere ARTE č chiaro a tutti (visto che offre un canale alternativo di
> musica classica a pagamento).
Arte, parlando di musica classica, non e' affatto un'alternativa gratuita a
Classica. Arte e' un canale da - quando va grassa - un concerto a settimana.
Semmai Eins Festival (su Astra) potrebbe toglierti l'interesse per
Classica...
> Ma come fa a giustificarlo con fandonie simili?
Prima di dire che sono fandonie occorrerebbe circostanziare.
> E' poi legale che Sky oscuri un canale concorrente?
Il decoder e' il loro e ci fanno quello che vogliono... la gente non ha
ancora inteso questo "simpatico" particolare.
>che dice il Garante dell'antitrust?
Ultimamente, in merito a Sky, s'e' pronunciato dicendo che va tutto bene e
tutto quanto avviene e' piu' che lecito.
Questo avvalora la mia ipotesi che il retto italico e' una bottiglia di
Klein: puoi infilarci dentro di tutto che mai si riempira'. :P
   Jenner



title: Il canale Arte e Sky

author: Rodolfo Canaletti

text:
Antonio <
oi...@libero.it
> wrote:
> Sembra che SKY abbia risposto che ARTE non è visualizzabile sullo Skybox in
> quanto non trasmette su Hotbird.
Questa storia non l'ho mai capita. Con il goldbox e la parabola puntata
su Hotbird non sono mai riuscito a captare  arte (che invece sarebbe
captabile con ricevitori del commercio). Avendo solo goldbox ho duvuto
mettere il secondo focus alla parabola in modo essere collegato anche
con astra. In questo modo ho potuto ricevere arte.
Gia' qui sul NG c'e' stata una discussione, e molti si sono trovati
d'accordo nell'affermare che arte trasmetteva anche tramite Hiotbird ma
che goldbox non era il ricevitore adatto.
>
> Ma se è vero che non trasmette su Hotbird, com'è che io riesco a vederlo con
> un Goldbox puntato su Hotbird?
Non lo so. Evidentemente qualche cosa e' cambiato rispetto a un anno fa.
Con lo Skybox, comunque, potendo captare solo 20 canali liberi, si e'
totalmente nelle mani di Sky e delle sua tecnologia esclusiva, di sua
proprieta', e non presente neppure nei ricevitori del commercio.
Quindi in conclusione, se vuoi prendere canali liberi in chiaro di
qualita' come arte, 3sat, EinFestival, e le radio, italiane e straniere,
(Radio3, France Musiques, Bayern 4 Klassic etc) devi avere due
ricevitori e una parabola con due fuochi.
Almeno in questo modo io ci sono riuscito.
Sky e' stata sommersa da proteste come la tua. Sembra che non intenda
modificare la sua tecnologia, che rimarrebbe cosi' sua esclusiva
proprieta', ma acconsentirebbe a portare i canali liberi del suo
ricevitore da 20 a 300. Questo dovrebbe avvenire fra qualche mese.

> Il fatto che Sky non abbia interesse al fatto che gli italiani riescano a
> ricevere ARTE è chiaro a tutti (visto che offre un canale alternativo di
> musica classica a pagamento).
arte non offre solo musica classica, ma una grande quantita' di servizi
di alta qualita' , su storia, attualita', prosa, cinema, notizie, etc.
Dire che sia concorrente per la musica classica e' riduttivo. In realta'
sarebbe concorrente di moltissimi canali specialitici. Quello che non si
trova sono la pubblicità, le telenovele, i reality show, e tutta la
spazzatura offerta dalle nostre televisioni generaliste.
Non so se SKY sia in grado di oscurarlo. Il problema e' forse il range
di frequenze di Skybox, che con solo 20 canali liberi, non e' in grado
di captare arte su Hotbird.
Ciao
Rudy
--
For there was never yet philosopher
That could endure the toothache patiently
(Shakespeare: Much Ado about Nothing)


title: Il canale Arte e Sky

author: Antonio

text:
                    Il 27 Set 2004, 11:41,
rodolfo....@tin.it
 (Rodolfo Canaletti) ha
scritto:
> Antonio <
oi...@libero.it
> wrote:
>
>
> > Sembra che SKY abbia risposto che ARTE non è visualizzabile sullo Skybox
in
> > quanto non trasmette su Hotbird.
>
> Questa storia non l'ho mai capita. Con il goldbox e la parabola puntata
> su Hotbird non sono mai riuscito a captare arte (che invece sarebbe
> captabile con ricevitori del commercio). Avendo solo goldbox ho duvuto
> mettere il secondo focus alla parabola in modo essere collegato anche
> con astra. In questo modo ho potuto ricevere arte.
>
Come mi pare emerga con chiarezza anche dai post degli altri intervenuti
("Brenno", "G. A.", NeuRoTiX), ARTE trasmette anche su Hotbird. Se non ho
capito male è sintonizzabile da metà settembre. In effetti io lo vedo da
circa una decina di giorni.
>
> arte non offre solo musica classica, ma una grande quantita' di servizi
> di alta qualita' , su storia, attualita', prosa, cinema, notizie, etc.
> Dire che sia concorrente per la musica classica e' riduttivo.
OK, non intendevo essere riduttivo. Sicuramente però SKY lo avverte come un
concorrente pericoloso per il proprio canale a pagamento di musica classica.
Tant'è vero che nella polemica con Abbado riportata sui giornali, hanno
ricordato che se gli abbonati Sky non possono vedere Arte, tuttavia hanno la
possibilità di abbonarsi a "Classica" ed appagare le esigenze di cultura a
cui Abbado faceva riferimento.
Quindi non sono stato io il primo a considerare ARTE come competitore di
CLASSICA.
> Non so se SKY sia in grado di oscurarlo. Il problema e' forse il range
> di frequenze di Skybox, che con solo 20 canali liberi, non e' in grado
> di captare arte su Hotbird.
In realtà ho memorizzato ARTE nella lista dei 20 canali liberi. Però quando
lo seleziono, non si vede niente. Non so se è voluto o meno, ma non si vede.
E il motivo non può essere quanto SKY sembra aver detto, secondo quanto
hanno riferito i giornali, cioè che Sky non trasmette su Hotbird



title: Il canale Arte e Sky

text:
                    Il 27 Set 2004, 11:36,
jen...@neurotix.com
 (NeuRoTiX) ha scritto:
>
> > Ho poi letto della polemica tra Abbado e Sky, con il primo che denuncia
il
> > fatto che Sky impedisce agli italiani di ricevere ARTE.
>
> Queste mi mancano... dove le hai lette?
Un trafiletto su Repubblica un paio di giorni fa



title: Il canale Arte e Sky

author: G. A.

text:
Antonio wrote:
> Ho in casa lo Skybox con codisica NDS e il Goldbox con la scheda seca non
> attiva.
>
> Entrambi i decoder sono puntati su Hot bird.
>
> Con il Goldbox riesco a vedere il canale ARTE. Sullo Skybox, dopo aver fatto
> tutta la procedura per memorizzarlo tra i 20 canali in chiaro
> visualizzabili, ho scoperto che questo canale è oscurato.
>
Ho fatto delle ricerche ed Arte  lo puoi vedere ( con il meccanismo
veramente farraginoso che si sono inventati) tra "gli altri canali" e si
"nasconde" sotto la voce "Ultra Blue TV". Mi scuso con tutti per le
informazioni imprecise che avevo postato prima.
Gianfranco


title: Il canale Arte e Sky

text:
Antonio wrote:
<cut>
> In realtà ho memorizzato ARTE nella lista dei 20 canali liberi. Però quando
> lo seleziono, non si vede niente. Non so se è voluto o meno, ma non si vede.
>
Quell'ARTE che non vedi è quello codificato per il bouquet TPS e non è
mai stato visibile.


title: Il canale Arte e Sky

text:
Antonio <
oi...@libero.it
> wrote:
> Come mi pare emerga con chiarezza anche dai post degli altri intervenuti
> ("Brenno", "G. A.", NeuRoTiX), ARTE trasmette anche su Hotbird. Se non ho
> capito male è sintonizzabile da metà settembre. In effetti io lo vedo da
> circa una decina di giorni.
In effetti era noto. E quello che pure era noto che con goldbox non lo
si poteva ricevere da Hotbird. Se ora le cose sono cambiate, tanto
meglio.
Una curiosita', tu ricevi il canale tedesco o quello francese?



title: Il canale Arte e Sky

text:
                    Il 27 Set 2004, 13:19,
rodolfo....@tin.it
 (Rodolfo Canaletti) ha
scritto:
>
> Una curiosita', tu ricevi il canale tedesco o quello francese?
>
Quello che ricevo io ha il doppio audio, si può selezionare il tedesco o il
francese.
Mi viene però il dubbio che stiamo parlando della stessa cosa.
Il canale a cui mi riferisco io è quello che ha la programmazione su:
http://www.arte-tv.com/



title: Il canale Arte e Sky

text:
"NeuRoTiX" <
jen...@neurotix.com
> ha scritto
> > Ho in casa lo Skybox con codisica NDS e il Goldbox con la scheda seca
non
> > attiva.
>
> Condoglianze...
> cut
Leggo sempre i tuoi post sulle questioni tecniche anche se ci capisco
pochissimo, a causa della mia ignoranza in merito.
Intuendo che esistono varie tipologie di decoder e ti faccio quindi una
semplice domanda a cui puoi rispondere qui sul ng o, se preferisci, in pvt
(wf2 at
ciaoweb.it
): siccome devo acquistare un decoder e sapendo che quelli
Sky hanno tutta una serie di limitazioni, puoi dirmi che caratteristiche
deve aver un dec. per garantire la visione del maggior numero possibile di
stazioni (cioč che non sia Sky-limitato)?
Con un modello con tali caratteristiche posso cmq abbonarmi a Sky?
Chiedo perdono per l'ignoranza e ti ringrazio sin d'ora! :-)
--
WF2


title: Il canale Arte e Sky

text:
Antonio <
oi...@tele2.it
> wrote:
> Quello che ricevo io ha il doppio audio, si può selezionare il tedesco o il
> francese.
>
> Mi viene però il dubbio che stiamo parlando della stessa cosa.
E' lo stesso, lo stesso. Di arte ce n'e' uno solo, come trasmissione
Solo che il mio  canale e' parlato solo in tedesco e nelle opere la
sottotitolazione e' tedesca. Mi hanno detto anche altri cio' che stai
dicendo tu, ma il mio canale e' crucco fino in fondo. Di francese
proprio non ne vuol sapere.
O sono io che non sono capace di fare la miracolosa trasformazione?



title: Il canale Arte e Sky

author: Maestro Spinelloccio

text:
"Antonio" <
oi...@libero.it
> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:81Z208Z114Z69Y...@usenet.libero.it...
>
> Ho poi leto della polemica tra Abbado e Sky, con il primo che denuncia il
> fatto che Sky impedisce agli italiani di ricevere ARTE.
>
"L'annuncio ufficiale ci sarà a giorni. Lo darà a Cannes il presidente di
RaiSat Carlo Sartori in occasione di un incontro con Jerome Clement,
presidente del network franco-tedesco Arté. Vedremo per sei ore a settimana
(più una giornata tematica al mese), il meglio dei programmi offerti dal
canale culturale Arté, una vera istituzione europea, selezionati, tradotti
in italiano e trasmessi da RaiSat Premium (pacchetto Mondo Sky)."
Siamo una colonia.
M.S.


title: Il canale Arte e Sky

text:
Il 27 Set 2004, 11:41,
rodolfo....@tin.it
 (Rodolfo Canaletti) ha
scritto:
>Questa storia non l'ho mai capita.
Mo te la spiego.
Il Goldbox o lo Skybox possono sintonizzare _SOLAMENTE_ i canali trasmessi
in MCPC con un Symbol Rate o di 22000 o di 27500 kbaud (indicativamente MCPC
lo puoi pensare come alla possibilita' di mandare piu' di un canale per
trasponder; un baud e' un simbolo, puoi fare finta che si tratti di un bit
ma ti dico che, anche se c'e' coincidenza, un baud non equivale ad un bit).
Data questa premessa su Hotbird, per quel che riguarda ARTE, abbiamo questa
situazione:
a) ARTE Français - 10834 MHz; pol.V; Symbol Rate 27500; FEC 3/4; Crittato
Viaccess;
b) ARTE Deutsch - 11060 MHz; pol.V; Symbol Rate 6510; FEC 5/6;
c) ARTE Français - 11060 MHz; pol.V; Symbol Rate 6510; FEC 5/6;
d) ARTE Français - 11623 MHz; pol.V; Symbol Rate 27500; FEC 3/4;
Su Astra 19.2° Est, sempre per quel che riguarda ARTE:
e) ARTE Français - 11568 MHz; pol.V; Symbol Rate 22000; FEC 5/6;
f) ARTE Deutsch - 11836 MHz; pol.H; Symbol Rate 27500; FEC 3/4;
A fronte di quanto detto e' facile intuire che i canali (a), (b) e (c) non
sono sintonizzabili sul Goldbox, mentre i canali (d), (e) e (f) sono
sintonizzabili. Il canale (d) e' stato attivato giusto 15 giorni fa il che
significa che prima di quella data, per vedere ARTE con un Goldbox, era
necessario un sistema Dual Feed che captasse anche Astra.
Oggi praticamente non c'e' piu' necessita' dell'impianto Dual Feed per
vedere ARTE... solo che, a mio parere, un'appassionato di musica classica
che non si mette su almeno un Dual Feed Hotbird+Astra e' sostanzialmente
folle! :P
>Non lo so. Evidentemente qualche cosa e' cambiato rispetto a un anno fa.
La situazione dei canali sul satellite cambia (parliamo di cambiamenti
medio-importanti) con cadenza meno che bimestrale... per i cambiamenti
piccoli la cadenza e' giornaliera.
>Con lo Skybox, comunque, potendo captare solo 20 canali liberi,
>si e' totalmente nelle mani di Sky e delle sua tecnologia
>esclusiva, di sua proprieta', e non presente neppure nei
>ricevitori del commercio.
Soluzione: disdire l'abbonamento e acquistare un ricevitore CI o FTA.
   Jenner



title: Il canale Arte e Sky

text:
Maestro Spinelloccio <
leo...@fastwebnet.it
> wrote:
> "L'annuncio ufficiale ci sarà a giorni. Lo darà a Cannes il presidente di
> RaiSat Carlo Sartori in occasione di un incontro con Jerome Clement,
> presidente del network franco-tedesco Arté.
arte. E' un acronimo.
> Vedremo per sei ore a settimana
> (più una giornata tematica al mese), il meglio dei programmi offerti dal
> canale culturale Arté, una vera istituzione europea, selezionati, tradotti
> in italiano e trasmessi da RaiSat Premium (pacchetto Mondo Sky)."
Quindi siamo di nuovo nel guano. Che senso ha? sei ore alla settimana di
arte? Ridicolo!!!  e poi una giornata tematica al mese? Che cosa
significa? che faranno un assemblaggio dei programmi che interessano
loro e ce li propinano come giornata tematica? (Notoriamente arte non ha
giornate tematiche, ma programmi chiamati Thema che vengono trasmessi
tutti i giorni e che riguardano oggetti piu' svariati).
Mah! quasi quasi viene da rimpiangere il vecchio Bernabei, che era
bigotto come una beghina, ma almeno la televisione sapeva a che cosa
serviva (anche se non sapeva cosa farsene delle figlie, visto che una
l'ha mandata in sposa al vorace bruco fede).



title: Il canale Arte e Sky

text:
WF2 wrote:
[...]
> Chiedo perdono per l'ignoranza e ti ringrazio sin d'ora! :-)
Non hai nulla da farti perdonare... piuttosto dovrebbero essere i media
in generale a chiedere perdono per un sacco di cose (fra queste il
mettere confusione in testa alla gente).
Se non ho capito male cerchi un ricevitore che ti possa far vedere anche
Sky... ecco, se e' questo che cerchi mi spiace dirti che l'unica cosa
che ti permettera' di vedere Sky di qui a 4/5 mesi sara' il loro
decoder. [Detto questo penso sia chiaro dove e' criticabile il
comportamento di Sky]
Questa l'amara realta'.
Se sei anche interessato a ricevitori che non possono essere utilizzati
per vedere Sky (in pratica ci puoi vedere tutti i canali in chiaro e,
con il modulo di codifica apposito potresti sottoscrivere un qualsiasi
abbonamento ad una paytv europera - ad eccezione, ovviamente, di Sky UK)
allora la scelta e' vasta e la scelta si dovrebbe basare sulle
potenzialita' richieste al ricevitore.
Se ti basta guardare solo i canali in chiaro ci sono i ricevitori FTA
(free to air, ovvero in chiaro) il cui costo e' quasi sempre sotto i 100
euro (abbondantemente al di sotto, ma visto che ci sono eccezioni...).
Con questi ricevitori non hai praticamente possibilita', un giorno -
casomai ne avessi necessita', di ricevere nulla di crittato... per
tenere aperta la porta ai moduli contenenti le codifiche la tua scelta
dovra' andare verso ricevitori CI (Common Interface, praticamente
un'interfaccia standard che ti permette l'aggiunta di moduli al
ricevitore... attualmente usata solo per implementare la decodifica di
segnali crittati) i cui prezzi stanno mediamente sui 130 euro (in
realta' puoi partire da 90 euro fino ad arrivare a 400 euro).
Se le tue esigenze sono ancora superiori si arriva ai ricevitori PVR
(Personal Video Recorder, praticamente dei "videoregistratori" digitali)
che ti danno la possibilita', grazie ad un hard disk interno, di
registrare i programmi televisivi e/o radiofonici e di implementare la
funzione di time-shifting (praticamente il poter mettere in pausa un
programma - il tipico esempio e' il telefono che suona mentre guardi
qualcosa - e riprenderne la visione in differita). Le funzionalita' in
genere piu' richieste a questi ricevitori sono il consentire il
trasferimento delle registrazioni (si tratta di file MPEG) verso il PC.
Si preferiscono i ricevitori con connettore ethernet (10/100 mbps) in
quanto i file delle registrazioni sono di parecchi gigabyte (registrare
2 ore su Canale 5, per fare un esempio, genera un file di oltre 7GB)...
e se ti trovi con il solo connettore USB 1.1 ci metti molto tempo a
trasferire i file. Gia' meglio e' la connessione USB 2.0 (c'e' anche un
modello Jepssen che ha la connessione IDE esterna).
Il problema della connessione non si pone se prevedi di registrare quasi
solo programmi radiofonici: l'USB 1.1 e' gia' sufficente per queste
cose e la sua "lentezza" non si fa sentire piu' di tanto.
Il prezzo di questi ricevitori si aggira sui 500 euro e dipende molto
dal taglio dell'hard disk installato.
Come al solito qui arrivo a parlare del Dreambox... si tratta di un
ricevitore che fa tutto quello che fa un PVR e che, quanto ad
espandibilita' software e' pari ad un PC. Basti pensare che le codifiche
le puoi avere anche per emulazione software (quindi senza comprare i
moduli... generalmente molto costosi - indicativamente 80 euro medi) e
hai anche la possibilita' di installare plug-in che ti leggono altri
tipi di file (dagli mp3, agli ogg, ai flac...) rendendo, di fatto, il
ricevitore alla stregua di un centro multimediale. Infine la
possibilita' di metterlo in rete con un PC e poter usare quest'ultimo
per vedere (o ascoltare) i canali da remoto ne fanno una macchina
eccezionale.
Di contro, come ho gia' detto, il Dreambox non e' un ricevitore per
neofiti... gia' non e' facile abituarsi e comprende il mondo della tv
satellitare fuori dall'ovatta di Sky (anche se poi, dopo le difficolta'
iniziali, lo si apprezzera'... e anche parecchio), se poi uno ci mette
anche di mezzo il Dreambox o lascia perdere o se ne innamora.
[ora, non voglio metterti paura, il Dreambox e' sempre un ricevitore, lo
si usa senza particolari problemi... solo che quando sai che potresti
ottenere certe cose la curiosita' ha il sopravvento: se hai una Ferrari
vuoi non provare a spingere un po' sull'accelleratore? ;)]
Per quel che riguarda i modelli specifici ti rimanderei ai miei post di
qualche mese fa (e' un argomento che torna regolarmente).
Se hai altri dubbi scrivi pure, se posso rispondere lo faccio
volentieri.
   Jenner
--
**
http://neurotix.com
** jenner(a)
neurotix.com


title: Il canale Arte e Sky

text:
"Rodolfo Canaletti" <
rodolfo....@tin.it
> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:1gksdc0.nu0yhestgsvkN%rodolfo....@tin.it...
> Maestro Spinelloccio <
leo...@fastwebnet.it
> wrote:
>
>
> > "L'annuncio ufficiale ci sarà a giorni. Lo darà a Cannes il presidente
di
> > RaiSat Carlo Sartori in occasione di un incontro con Jerome Clement,
> > presidente del network franco-tedesco Arté.
>
> arte. E' un acronimo.
>
Siamo colonia due volte. Il pezzo sopra è tratto dalla home page di
Satellite.
M.S.


title: Il canale Arte e Sky

text:
"NeuRoTiX" ha scritto
> Non hai nulla da farti perdonare... piuttosto dovrebbero essere i media
> in generale a chiedere perdono per un sacco di cose (fra queste il
> mettere confusione in testa alla gente).
>cut
Non posso che ringraziarti di cuore e sperare che il nostro
"domanda/risposta" sia stato utile anche ad altri.
:-)
--
WF2


title: Il canale Arte e Sky

author: carlo gerelli

text:
                    Il 27 Set 2004, 12:55, "G. A." <g...@nowhere.land> ha scritto:
> Antonio wrote:
> Ho fatto delle ricerche ed Arte lo puoi vedere ( con il meccanismo
> veramente farraginoso che si sono inventati) tra "gli altri canali" e si
> "nasconde" sotto la voce "Ultra Blue TV". Mi scuso con tutti per le
> informazioni imprecise che avevo postato prima.
grazie moltissime invece per la dritta ! confermo che Arte si vede sullo
SkyBox
(fra gli "altri canali") sotto questo nome di Ultra Blue TV che dovrebbe
corrispondere
in teoria ad una TV porno. Invece c'è Arte, e pure in due lingue.
ciao e grazie ancora
c.



title: Il canale Arte e Sky

text:
Il 28 Set 2004, 08:59,
mancoc...@libero.it
 (carlo gerelli) ha scritto:
> grazie moltissime invece per la dritta ! confermo che Arte si vede sullo
> SkyBox
> (fra gli "altri canali") sotto questo nome di Ultra Blue TV che dovrebbe
> corrispondere
> in teoria ad una TV porno. Invece c'è Arte, e pure in due lingue.
Ecco, ti posto un po' di motivi per farti comunque il Dual Feed:
http://www.theaterkanal.de/inhalt/fernsehen/SearchReportDatum?datum=2004%2F09%2F28&x=8&y=4
(programmazione di oggi di ZDF Theaterkanal)
http://www.ard-digital.de/ipg/rubrik.php?tipMode=&genreID=7&timeStart=2004-09-28+05%3A30%3A00&timeEnd=2004-09-29+05%3A29%3A00
(spaccato della programmazione culturale di ARD - e' una settimana con poca
roba questa)
http://www.ard-digital.de/ipg/radiosender.php?stationID=3481
http://www.ard-digital.de/ipg/radiosender.php?stationID=3482
http://www.ard-digital.de/ipg/radiosender.php?stationID=3489
http://www.ard-digital.de/ipg/radiosender.php?stationID=3490
http://www.ard-digital.de/ipg/radiosender.php?stationID=3495
http://www.ard-digital.de/ipg/radiosender.php?stationID=3499
http://www.ard-digital.de/ipg/radiosender.php?stationID=3500
(alcune emittenti radiofoniche in chiaro... )
...magari tutto questo ti convince pure a cestinare il tuo *box! :D
[non fosse altro che su un ricevitore normale al posto di "Ultrablue"
avresti letto "Arte"]
   Jenner



title: L'IGNORANZA MUSICALE IN ITALIA E' GRAVISSIMA

author: enziotempo

text:
Articoletto intervista/Berlinguer su il Giornale dello Spettacolo
(11/01/2008).
qui in archivio data odierna:
http://www.enteteatrale.it/firstContent.asp?idContenutiLivello1=21&idScript=27


author: ranapo

text:
enziotempo;546916 Wrote:
> Articoletto intervista/Berlinguer su il Giornale dello Spettacolo
> (11/01/2008).
> qui in archivio data odierna:
> '_-_-_-_@@Eti - Ente Teatrale Italiano@@_-_-_-_'
> (
http://tinyurl.com/2u6kgp
)
Grazie per la segnalazione.
Che te ne pare?
Berlinguer mi pare coinvolto, sincero e appassionato.
ranapo
--
ranapo
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ranapo's Profile:
http://www.sonicbands.it/member.php?userid=810
View this thread:
http://www.sonicbands.it/showthread.php?t=69333


text:
On 16 Gen, 00:20, ranapo <ranapo.339...@no-
mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au
> wrote:
> enziotempo;546916 Wrote:
>
> > Articoletto intervista/Berlinguer su il Giornale dello Spettacolo
> > (11/01/2008).
> > qui in archivio data odierna:
> > '_-_-_-_@@Eti - Ente Teatrale Italiano@@_-_-_-_'
> > (
http://tinyurl.com/2u6kgp
)
>
> Grazie per la segnalazione.
> Che te ne pare?
Sono totalmente pessimista. Nessuno si accorgerà di nulla, né dentro
la scuola né, tantomeno, fuori. Ci vuole una rivoluzione per cambiare
le cose. Ma oggi se fai la rivoluzione ti dicono che sei fascista. C'è
un po' di confusione, tipicamente italiana. Finirà che l'Europa ci
esclude e si prende il Libano o il Marocco.
ET


author: Giampaolo Lomi

text:
Il Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:36:45 -0800 (PST), enziotempo
<
enzio...@libero.it
> ha scritto:
>Sono totalmente pessimista. Nessuno si accorgerà di nulla, né dentro
>la scuola né, tantomeno, fuori. Ci vuole una rivoluzione per cambiare
>le cose. Ma oggi se fai la rivoluzione ti dicono che sei fascista. C'è
>un po' di confusione, tipicamente italiana. Finirà che l'Europa ci
>esclude e si prende il Libano o il Marocco.
>
>ET
Si....magari....Ma chi ci piglia a noi ????
GP


author: Hans Rott

text:
On 18 Gen, 03:37, Giampaolo Lomi <
gialo3TO...@fastwebnet.it
> wrote:
> Si....magari....Ma chi ci piglia a noi ????
Forse il Vaticano.
P.


text:

Sento già puzza di carne arrostita...
ET


author: dimitri

text:
Oh, gente, avete letto cosa ha scritto ranapo?
> enziotempo;546916 Wrote:
>> Articoletto intervista/Berlinguer su il Giornale dello Spettacolo
>> (11/01/2008).
>> qui in archivio data odierna:
>> '_-_-_-_@@Eti - Ente Teatrale Italiano@@_-_-_-_'
>> (
http://tinyurl.com/2u6kgp
)
>
> Grazie per la segnalazione.
> Che te ne pare?
> Berlinguer mi pare coinvolto, sincero e appassionato.
>
> ranapo
secondo me Berlinguer è uno dei personaggi più tristi della storia della
nostra repubblica, il peggior ministro dell P.I. secondo me, la sua idea di
mettere la filosofia e la musica negli istituti professionali indica la sua
totale ignoranza circa la vita scolastica, non ha la più pallida idea di
cosa sia la scuola
D.


author: EmilimE

text:
>> Grazie per la segnalazione.
>> Che te ne pare?
>> Berlinguer mi pare coinvolto, sincero e appassionato.
>>
>> ranapo
>
> secondo me Berlinguer č uno dei personaggi piů tristi della storia della
> nostra repubblica, il peggior ministro dell P.I. secondo me, la sua idea
> di
> mettere la filosofia e la musica negli istituti professionali indica la
> sua
> totale ignoranza circa la vita scolastica, non ha la piů pallida idea di
> cosa sia la scuola
> D.
>
>
Perchč, si fa musica negli istituti professionali?
E.


author: Lulu

text:
Ho studiato musica alle superiori (si fa per dire). Qualcuno dovrebbe
spiegarmi perchè soltanto "le maestre" cioè alle magistrali è
riservato ancora quest'onore. Chi svela l'arcano?
E' ovvio che poi non potranno andarla ad insegnare... e dunque?!?
Vale!
Lulu


text:
Alle elementari la musica ("educazione al suono"?) č prevista come materia
quindi le "maestre" dovrebbero insegnarla, per quello č prevista
all'ex-istituto magistrale (oggi liceo pedagogico, credo).
E.
> Ho studiato musica alle superiori (si fa per dire). Qualcuno dovrebbe
> spiegarmi perchč soltanto "le maestre" cioč alle magistrali č



text:
Normalmente però le maestre appaltano l'insegnamento della materia a
gente che o ne sa meno di loro, o ne sa troppo, in ogni caso quasi mai
adeguata a quel tipo d'insegnamento, per cui conta poco aver suonato
in orchestra o essersi perfezionati nelle migliori accademie per lo
studio dello strumento!


text:

Non fanno altro che cantare... Come a suo tempo disse anche il
Pestelli al Berlinguer, "troppa enfasi sui cori" (intervista radio3).
ET


text:
> Non fanno altro che cantare... Come a suo tempo disse anche il
> Pestelli al Berlinguer, "troppa enfasi sui cori" (intervista radio3).
>
> ET
W il Pestelli!


text:
Oh, gente, avete letto cosa ha scritto EmilimE?
>>> Grazie per la segnalazione.
>>> Che te ne pare?
>>> Berlinguer mi pare coinvolto, sincero e appassionato.
>>>
>>> ranapo
>>
>> secondo me Berlinguer è uno dei personaggi più tristi della storia
>> della nostra repubblica, il peggior ministro dell P.I. secondo me,
>> la sua idea di
>> mettere la filosofia e la musica negli istituti professionali indica
>> la sua
>> totale ignoranza circa la vita scolastica, non ha la più pallida
>> idea di cosa sia la scuola
>> D.
>>
>>
>
> Perchè, si fa musica negli istituti professionali?
> E.
lui voleva inserire musica e filosofia in tutte le scuole, non considerando
che ai professionali hanno già 40 ore settimanali e che non gliene frega di
materie molto più importanti della musica, poer cui figurarsi quanti
sarebbero disposti a solfeggiare (Berlinguer è un accanito sostenitore del
solfeggio, pratica ormai quasi ridicola) e a suonare strumenti vari...,
insomma è proprio fuori dalla realtà
D.


title: HAPPY BIRTHDAY DONALD GRAMM/EMMA KIRKBY

author: Gerald Waldman

text:
NO BLOOD protocol FOR the elders of ZION
----------------------------
"In life, democracy.
In art, aristocracy."
--- Arturo Toscanini
----------------------------
On 26 September 2000, the so-called Great Mickey (Mouse) Richter
performed a 'plug in', heroically, on behalf of Klaus Heiman [sic],
the so-called Authority behind ---naXos---:
http://listserv.cuny.edu/Scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0009D&L=opera-l&P=R10995
Thus spoke the authority:
"Most singers understand that recording opera is extremely expensive,
especially under our perfect studio (not live) conditions and are
happy with our modest flat fees. Look at our Fidelio cast! The bit
about being allowed only two or three takes and no chance of fancy
editing is nonsense ... artists are allowed as many takes as necessary
to get the music right. However, having said that, we expect our
artists to be well prepared unlike many big-name artists who rely on
the producer and editor to produce a good performance."
We ask:
1. Mr. Heiman seems to have contradicted himself by simultaneously
affirming that his artists are indeed allowed "fancy editing...to get
the music right" and ranting against the "many big-name artists who
rely on the producer and editor to produce a good performance." What
exactly is the difference? Isn't fancy editing what earns producers
and editors their bacon, be it at naXos or Lucifer Classics? Or is Mr.
Heiman whining because Lucifer's console is bigger than his?
2. Mr. Heiman seems to have fallen prey to the epidemic virus of
unfounded critical prejudice and the politics of defamation and
character-assassination (the rate of infection appears to be
abnormally high within the familial fraternity of
American/Anglosaxon/Anglophile critical bedfellows). His words can be
easily formulized: "Big Name + Big Label = Little Music (or Falsity)".
No need to state the converse: "Little/No Name + Little Label = Big
Music (or Truth)". Who exactly are these many unprepared big names?
And how, where, and when?
3. A few years back, the authority was also quoted in "The Boston
Globe" - this other 'plug in' courtesy of
CareerFaggot-turned-critic-turned-promoter Richard "local church mice
are world-class people too" Dyer. Lately,
Dyer has been heard advocating for the equal part Charity/Chimpanzee
Acts that are The Three Mo' Tenors, Andrea Bocelli, and Charlotte
Church.
["Maestros of the Pen: A History of Classical Music Criticism in
America", by Mark N. Grant, Northeastern University Press, 1998, ISBN
1-55553-363-9:  n-o-t  o-n-e  f-o-o-t-n-o-t-e  on Dyer --- and this
after a 25-year+ career behind him dedicated to latter-day
Anglo+Judeo+Homo-centric bitchery and dishonesty; and just as long
dedicated to sobbing after one Lucine Amara.]
But back to the authority:
"The market is shifting away from name artists, and the average music
lover is confused by bins crowded by recordings. What is the
difference between Riccardo Muti, Claudio Abbado and Riccardo Chailly
in a given piece? Whatever the difference is, it doesn't mean anything
to the average music lover who gives up and chooses our recording
because it is more reasonably priced, and the performance is just as
good. It is an absurdity for Plácido Domingo to sing 'The Barber of
Seville'; our recording is a better performance of the opera. If
Cheryl Studer were to come to me and ask to sing some of the operas
she has recorded, I wouldn't let her." {Author: Richard Dyer / Date:
19.01.1994 / Page: 61 / Section: Living Arts}
We comment and ask:
3A. Funny but we bet that the suits at Lucifer Classics swear
t-h-e-i-r  barber gives a better haircut. Not that some of us (not
nearly enough) give a damn about Sire Domingo, at least not since his
early 90s (and thereafter) publicity and musical circus prostitutions.
3B. Let us cut to the chase: we propose that one big reason for
the present-day crisis is that the ever-so-important anecdotal
experience of the live stage experiences  a-n-d  documented
legacies of certain important big-names (those immediately preceding
the generation of today's so-called "A List") literally fell through a
 g-e-n-e-r-a-t-i-o-n-a-l  c-r-a-c-k.  In the realm of opera, this
previous generation came "too soon" after the Marias and the Renatas
and the Joans and the Montserrats and the Vickys and the Mirellas and
the Regines and whoever....and "too late" for today's democratic
free-for-all (think of the deregulation of the airline industry in the
U.S.A. - surely it is cheaper to fly and with more options but the
experience is ghastly) in deadly mix with the quick fixes and
seductions of Hyper Public
Relations, Hyper Text, and Cyberspace. Few artists can survive without
some form of critical and popular encouragement. It became fashionable
sport (nah, Mob Rule - nah, Olympics) for too influential but equally
ignorant, tin-eared and incredibly, corrosively partial critics and
their bedroom partners to dismiss these artists' work faster than they
could say Compact Disc (and worse: to fully ignore too - consider the
phenomenon that is the Phenomenally Perverse Eclipsing by the press of
a certain
v-e-t-e-r-a-n  soprano whose stage appearances are pre-judged to be
just that: Appearances: Phantom Ships In The Night, when noticed ----
or to fully  d-e-n-y  the usual "critical analysis" - is that what it
is? - accorded minor lights ("Monsieur G could not sustain pitch
b-u-t  the Sicilian
understanding" [the same understanding which, according to the
experts, eludes fellow Southerner Riccardo Muti] - "Madame F [no other
soprano before or during Renée is known to have ever "taken
chances"] shrieked unnaturally, flatting two high A
naturals and her overall intonation was insecure too  b-u-t  the
gowns" - "Hausfrau V was in customary squally voice again last night
and her top sounded tired, though no fault of her own,  b-u-t  her
sofa scene was comfortably moving" - "Irish-American AFL-CIO Heroine F
[who, by the by, tries, and is carded, to "sing" "everything"] [no
other soprano before or during Lauren is known to have ever "taken
chances"] could not sing Reiza's music [she replaced
DeVoid, who had also cancelled all engagements in Vienna, and for the
2nd season in a row - not a bad thing when you try to remember those
Scheiße AIDAs at the MET where Crayola connected them dots and none of
the music - not to mention the brutal stupor that were
Pavarotti and the ever-accomodating Levine]  b-u-t  the visceral
collision") - "Madame Shout squalled an Elektra consistently below
pitch (that's about 75% of your evening) but no matter: the visceral
excitement of some level or other of on-pitch faithfulness to and by
die Juden and a few silent-movie camp gestures secured her
an unqualified triumph...and an onstage kiss from Jimmy Boy the
Paedophile (or rather, Jimmy the boy-paedophile - ladies and gents,
you too can have it all: from orchestras in Munich, Boston, and
naturally New York to standing Os to gushing
press coverage to state-sanctioned murder to Presidential Pardons (see
"Rich, Jonathan" - see "The Hassidic Four [that's right, not one not
two not three but four)" - see "Hillary 'some of my relatives are
Jews' Clinton" and the race for the NY State Senate]....provided you
are "one of us" or "with us") --- but for how much longer? --- stay
tuned
---....well, all that plus Gaby is getting better and better and
better, yes?" - "Madame Attila spreads her
top like butter on warm bread but her cool, Nordic, blonde looks
carried the night" - "Debbie 'Crayola Opera Program' Void's French is
for and about pigeons [let alone a sour and rusty tone reminiscent of
soiled underwear and as dull as laundrywater] but her 'major'
contributions to Culture are 'consistent.' --- or is it the other way
'round?" - "The consensus that Madame Shorties could not really sing
Konstanze is questionable and, in the end, unfair for she is a gifted
singer......but more importantly, her name is not Cheryl Studer" -
"Monsieur Hiccup proved once more that you can crack loud
and wide before a Manhattan audience of tourists as long as your name
is not Cheryl Studer; but more importantly, the loss of 95-plus
pounds, in cocktail with a widely broadcast the-dog-ate-the-homework
medication Sob Story, are sufficient to satisfy the most
discriminating demands
of the-below-IQ-of-47.5(that's-50%-of-something-or-other-to-you)-and-minus
set and anyday's coverage of the Arts in the Jew York Times" -
"Maestrisssssimo of Legend, Gilbert "Lego Blocks" Kaplan, swears he
can conduct but one piece of music and one piece of music alone but,
as one of "our own", full coverage by the Jew York Times is fully
warranted - all that plus a recording under the
syphillitic Deutsche Grammophon" ---you know the skit--- why yes,
ladies and gents, even  these acts of levitation are denied Midland,
Michigan's Prodigal Daughter --- But then, taking into account the
desperate [in vain] efforts toward reconstruction, toward opening new
markets (undue over-exposure in Arts journalism - over who counts -
over what counts - and when and
where -being the final vestige of their former Imperial selves), what
is the increasingly brilliant, independent-minded, impartial,
cultured,
mature, and sympathetic ---right?--- Anglocentric Universe to do with
a creature who refuses categorization? - of what value or use is the
lady? - of what value or use is the artist? - who is neither English
(nor pretender)
n-o-r  r-e-s-i-d-e-n-t  n-o-r  c-i-t-i-z-e-n  n-o-r  D-a-m-e  nor
Faerie
Queene nor Greek (nor pretender) nor black-and-blue (nor pretender)
nor German (nor pretender) nor Austrian (nor pretender) nor
Kammersängerin nor French (nor pretender) nor Cinema Paradiso Italian
(nor pretender) nor Eastern European (nor pretender) nor
Spaniard/Latin American bombshell (they are the flavor of the moment)
nor Argentinian Tango nor East Coast Yiddishbbuk nor Anonymous 4 nor
Asian nor Canadian nor Aussie --- nor, most importantly, deemed
sufficiently  A-m-e-r-i-c-a-n  --- n-o-r  r-e-s-i-d-e-n-t  nor
MET-centric nor Manhattan/Queens/Brooklyn-ette nor Broadway belcher
nor Saint Francis-can nor Angelena nor Chicagoan nor Texan nor New
Mexican nor
Washingtonian nor Saint Louis Gal nor panderer nor tall nor thin nor
heroine-overdose chic nor blonde nor Blonde Ambition nor grotesque nor
grotesquely zaftig nor power hungry nor faghag nor lesbian nor cherub
nor hairy chested nor fashion rag nor glamour puss nor aspirant nor
aspirate nor potential nor promise (what you hear is what you get) nor
apology nor preserved museum mummy nor soccer mum nor sucker nor trend
nor hip nor H.I.P. nor castrata nor contralto nor countertenor nor
counterculture nor lyric mezzo nor soprano on the verge of a mezzo
breakdown nor vice versa nor chanteuse nor soubrette nor starlet nor
coquette nor canary nor woodbird nor nightingale nor tic toc tic toc
tic toc nor geriatric nor vanity record label owner nor
transposer-conductor-intendant-voicecompetitor-crossover-moviemogul-realestatemagnate-restaurateur-sexsymbol-jetsetter
(all in one and one for all and all in a night) nor lazy nor shrinking
violet nor daddy's lil' lass nor mystic nor minimalist nor hyperbole
nor Überfeminist nor Konzept nor dreams and fables nor metaphysics nor
philosopher ("Philosophier' Er nicht, Herr Schatz...") nor scholar
(nor pretender) nor didact nor pedant nor peasant nor composer (you
know, like Callas, who wrote all them masterpieces now falsely
ascribed to one Bellini, one Donizetti, and one other Verdi) nor
paladin of the glorious avant-garde nor rarity rat nor rat tat tat nor
archaeologist nor room temperature nor Sponsored By Talbots nor
Anglican Service nor Vivaldi postcard nor Handel MBA [opera's answer
to the 80s business phenomenon - everyone has one] nor Britten MD nor
Janácek Nobel Prize nor cliché nor stunt nor parody nor caricature nor
Disney nor Ozzie & Harriett nor Will & Grace nor smiley face nor
horseface nor humor monger (in any event, not the shtick you grew up
with) nor camp nor marketing-promo tramp nor trademark nor
image-chaser nor
sensation-seeker nor Eurogarbage nor ez-listenin' nor pleasure ride
nor automatic cruise control nor sentiment-al nor cripple nor married
to one nor victim nor tearjerker nor nostalgia trip nor tourist trap
nor good-cause nor fund-raiser (so to speak) nor social worker nor
Katie Couric nor Walk For A Cure nor We Are The World nor Sound Of
Music nor Under nor Over The Rainbow nor Rainbow Coalition nor
Summertime nor Supper Time (nice tunes....if you can) nor fruit salad
nor cotton candy nor peaches in double cream nor café au lait nor dark
chocolate nor civil/human rights centerfold nor gulag survivor nor
married to one nor refugee nor married to one nor UN Ambassador nor
married to one nor member of any one precious special interest group
(you know who you are)  n-o-r  m-a-r-r-i-e-d  t-o
o-n-e  n-o-r  s-t-r-a-t-e-g-i-c-a-l-l-y  w-e-d-d-e-d  nor politician
nor married to one nor inter-national political crisis parasite nor
ad-minister of propaganda nor grassroots peace activist (you do know,
don't you, that them ancient favourite warhorses of yours composed by
Beethoven and Brahms and Wagner and Liszt were inspired by the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict --- ask Mehta and Señor Honorario und
Tolerant Barenboim --- by the
by, in a recent Chicago program of Hugo Wolf's Lieder, the "Great
Jewish Musician" [and we thought it un-Klezmer to allude to this
musician's other career] in harmony with his German/Christian
sub-ordinates - a "physically handicapped baritone" and an "underpitch
soprano" (see "Kubiak, David") - were heard "r-e-c-l-a-i-m-i-n-g  the
true meaning of the 'heilge Deutsches Kunst'" --- again, see "Kubiak,
David" --- please note that no one else before GJM had accomplished
nearly as much, and in a mere evening - of course, we know now that
Wolf wrote his songs inspired by populations everywhere holding hands
- to promote future handholding) nor married to one nor Adler Fella
nor Crayola Opera Program alumna nor
Cardiff-VeraRosza-Domingo-GeorgeLondon-RichieTucker-BelleSilverman-Albanese-Horne-Scotto-vonStade-Heggie
groupie nor traveler along the Anglo Silk Road --- the
LandOfOz-BerlinStaatsoperUDL-LaMonnaie-ENO-Glyndebourne-NYCO-Glimmerglass-StLouis-SantaFe-SanDiego-DallasO-HoustonGO-FloridaGO-n-such
workshop ghettoes.
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
[Imagine, if you dare.]
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
E-N-V-Y = D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N
but
S-I-L-E-N-C-E = D-E-A-T-H
Enter into the equation the contemptibly stupid (discerning,
discerning) audiences who (wanted to and still do) believe everything
they read...and voilà, the science gives the (false)
i-m-p-r-e-s-s-i-o-n  of yielding the expected (forced) hubris. Then
add the ones who stayed away from attending these artists'
performances because they were simply told to do so (in so many
words). Never mind the  c-o-w-a-r-d-s  who  n-e-v-e-r  attended but
who later saw fit to publish obituaries passing for legitimate
eyewitness reports (see "Maestros of the Pen: A History of Classical
Music Criticism in
America", 1998, by Mark N. Grant, and look up "Dyer, Richard"). Never
mind the  h-y-p-o-c-r-i-t-e-s  who, in addition to prematurely and
irresponsibly issuing death certificates (see "Davis, Peter G."),
years later were caught with their pants down performing auto-erotica
to the tune of "Returns Triumphantly!" (see "Davis, Peter G."). Little
wonder many ceased listening --- and begin listening with others' ears
they did.  But leave it to the bloodless (and if you don't have blood
you don't need a heart and if you don't have blood you will find
yourself thirsty, very thirsty, guaranteed) - it is in fact their
exclusive province - to accomplish such feats.
No, they were/are not Maria or Renata or Joan or Leonie or Gwyneth and
why should they be? --- Take the particularly complex case of a
fascinatingly complex, yet elemental, yet thoroughly modern, and yet
not, artist (and most private woman), Cheryl Studer --- was/is the
backlash really for l-a-c-k  o-f  q-u-a-l-i-t-y  or  l-a-c-k  o-f
a-r-t-i-s-t-i-c  w-o-r-t-h?
A decade or so later there's a
perceptible sense of panic and fatigue among critics, industry folk,
and fans alike, most
shockingly noticeable within the gated communities of the old and the
jaded, who can be heard loudly cheerleading anyone (and we mean
anyone)....
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[....as long as their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer.]
[God Willing.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[And yet more Enchantment courtesy of the Panacea/Schadenfreude of
Cheryl Studer-free zones/ground zeroes.]
[God Willing.]
[Young Ones - Do not be duped by the hollow enthusiasms of the age ---
ever seen a sad clown?]
[But now, oh today....Music and Art....or rather, what passes for
it....and every new product or stage appearance tossed our way by the
Star System we hate to love (certainly a system long preceding but
fatally ran to the ground by the prissiness of political correctness
and the Gestapo tactics of the instinct/thought-control police, in
concert with the 'World Music Congress' - the Rudases, the Sire
Jonases,
the Mehtas, the Holenders (whose nose of Middle Eastern provenance is
long and arrogant enough to sniff all the way to Berlin), the Levines,
the Maazels, the Heymanns, the Previns, the self-professed rap-music
fan von
Dohnanyis of the world (uncle
must be spinning in his ashes - ladies and gentlemen, more often than
we are led to believe, death CAN be in vain), The Three or Four or
Five or Six or Seven Whores
- we are losing count -, Best Friends & Co. Inc. Ltd. S.A. GmbH - the
Ozawas and the Gergievs too are major shareholders (and puppets) in
this "Juderei" - that's right, jUdErEi - we repeat: all this JuDeReI)
- i.e., by
the Star System of Bocelli, of course, or Hampson (now a pretty much
undisputed by-the-book Straussian, Wagnerian  a-n-d ...hear
hear...Verdian...of Stature, don't you know) or the Alagnas (a
f-a-k-e recording of Verdi's -Trovatore- for Sire Tony/EMI --- Grecian
Approximation No. XXV - we have lost count - has not sung Leonora
where it counts, on the stage) or the other Bocelli comrade,
Fleming....well, all of it  h-a-s  sudden Meaning and Necessity, so
the public relationists tell us....the Magic courtesy,  n-o-t  because
of
especially great voices or exceptional interpretive forces or
personalities or even of remotely acceptable  n-e-w  music, but
because:
NUMBER 1:  their names are  n-o-t  Cheryl Studer
and
NUMBER 2:  ...*in good portion and out of
proportion* the promo op-catchpenny that has become 9.11 --- a
monstrous crime monstrously debased by the Infernal Spinning Wheel of
commerce and avarice and revenge and murder (widely disguised as
justice) --- a tragedy now symbiotically hijacked to peddle everything
from Arms Races to Far Right-ism (see "Sharon, Ariel" --- how come we
don't hear strings of consistently shrill High Cs crying for  h-i-s
removal? --- this time, however, we applaud Barenboim for being
practically the only one publicly playing fiddle
on the roof of the problem) to Nationalism to Requiems to
Anglo-Zionist Terrorism --- the latter conducted both musically and
extra-curricularly, most prominently with (critical mass-destruction)
heavy-metal made in the squeaky clean U.S. of A. and paid for with
y-o-u-r  humble American tax dollar (as if you had a choice) and the
blood of  y-o-u-r  sons and daughters. --- So why won't Israel and its
Business/Washington lobbyists fight their next door neighbors, which
includes Iraq, all by themselves and with  t-h-e-i-r  o-w-n  currency
and leave us all  a-l-o-n-e  a-n-d  i-n  p-e-a-c-e?]
[Consequently, would that  t-h-e  o-t-h-e-r  terrorists went home
too.]
[In other words, and in order of appearance...
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
NO BLOOD FOR THE JOEY LIEBERMANS
NO BLOOD FOR THE PAUL WOLFOWITZES
NO BLOOD FOR THE ARI FLEISHERS
NO BLOOD FOR A MERE SANDBOX
NO BLOOD FOR ISRAEL
NO BLOOD FOR OIL
NO BLOOD FOR VENGEANCE
]
[Discuss, if you dare.]
[About the new studio-product (this is what we call them fakery, no?)
from EMI
---Idomeneo---, we are beginning to read puff like "a recording that
n-e-e-d-e-d  to be made." --- after all, it
contains the antipodean missionary of all things English, Sire
Charles; British Will o' Wisp Bostridge; Bocelli collaborator
Frittoli; and, to top it all, the New (Age) Callas - the
organically-grown, FDA approved, anodyne, pastel, drab as
damp cardboard, and dull as fishwater LetItRain Hunt(hyphen - I
married a techie with composer pretensions + I too have a Sob Story to
tell - mine is Breast Cancer - what is yours?) Lieberson.  But do not
for a second believe the ad-men....for this product is yet more of the
ho-hum variety.]
[And oh yes, LetItRain is an  "a-r-t-i-s-t", sensitive and musical -
albeit a very part-time one at that - but please please please notice
that very very very few others are as musical, let alone sensitive and
artistic].
[About the new DECCA ---Cocksucker Blues---, we are already reading
fluff like "A New  F-i-r-s-t  L-a-d-y  of Bel Canto - Renée Fleming
very nearly manages to shake the insistent ghost of Maria Callas."
(see "
www.andante.com
") --- But we (not enough of us) are neither deaf
nor naïve nor stupid. You see, n-e-v-e-r  e-v-e-r  f-o-r-g-e-t  that
sopranos of the calibre of Cheryl and Maria, bruised of voice and
heart or not, n-e-v-e-r  e-v-e-r  s-t-o-o-p-e-d  this low (below the
navel) in the style department. But, after all, the new product
(scooped up 3 years ago) is being sold under a neon sign that reads
"Bel Canto", complete with
a $2 rebate incentive  b-e-l-o-w  its reduced repo artistic sale
value. You know, in the manner of the stereo-typical toupéed and
polyester-clad used-car salesman - insincere, cajoling, slimy,
slippery, sleazy, sticky -- and that's the singing -- a raw deal.]
Blitzkrieg-style Public Relations, Marketing, and now
Blue-Collar/Working-Class Cheap Labor (and the aesthetics, or lack of,
of - see "Flanigan, Lauren" - see "Radvanovsky, Sondra" - "see Goerke,
Christine" - see "Slavs" - "the little touring companies that could")
have been summoned to the cause of salvaging
something or other from the debris of these self-appointed arbiters of
taste and self-avowed "opera/music lovers'" own making. And so the
armies of
businessmen have landed triumphantly with portfolios chock-full with
the truly untriumphant, the amateurs, the pedigree-less, the
unaccomplished, the homogeneous, the vocally faceless, the emaciated,
the pretty, the photogenic, the grotesque too, the church rodents, the
H.I.P.-voiced, the H.I.P.-mannered, the pedigree-less, the correct,
the obedient, the mega amplified, the firefighters, the policemen, the
construction workers, the factory slaves, the custodians, the
industrial quality, the white trash, the divas next door; the divas
next door with the cute children as gimmicks; the divas next door who
are so nice and behave so well and who must reassure us about it; the
divas next door who seek psychotherapy and then have the distaste to
announce it; the divas next door who relax to the Dixie Chicks; the
vedettes next door who love all that jazz and then scat and squat
through  e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g  that is European  a-n-d  Classical (and
not) --- but then, in music that requires precisely that, the phlegm
gets in the way of that thang called swing; the divas next door who
thrive on wrestling, meatloaf, and fish n' chips --- and show it; the
divas next
door who marry well, transgenderly; the divas next door who, although
already in their 40s and beyond, must appease us by "taking baby steps
to protect their voices" and who swear that that's why they will still
be in their prime in extreme old age; the divas next door who swear we
will want to hear them then; the optically challenged, the physically
handicapped, the sob stories, more sob stories, the pedigree-less, the
pedigree-less, the pedigree-less, and yet more of that. And some more
sob stories. And not to be missed: the Teddy Bears (think of - well
not really, since you can't - the cancellations, the vocal troubles,
the gross embarrassments of stunt-ed live programs - everything from
Beg Your Indulgences to Public Regrets to Tosti to Walkouts - by, for
instance, Juan Dieguito Flórez, Domingo, Terfel and Heppner - no
matter - the insulted audiences correspond to their cheating with
tears and Standing Os --- but no surprise here, for it is nothing but
another perversion of our desensitized, demoralized, diseased,
frivolous, diluted, and vulgar days --- f-u-c-k, even Joseito
"Leukemia Sob Story" Carreras became the object of one of these
demonstrations - and this in the enlightened and improved and newly
innocent and important again (so it
goes) Salzburg of the summer of two-thousand-and-two-after-christ).
And thus today's so-called "A-List" (really, nothing but a paid
announcement transmitted by the "Ass-ociated Press"), the P®ops, the
Pops, the Popp Clones, the Grümmer Clones, the Callas Clones, the
Tebaldi Clones, the Steber Clones, the Schwarzkopf Clones, the Price
Clones, the Cut n' Paste Composites, the Fischer-Dieskau Clones, the
Furtwängler Clones --- poor, pitiful facsimiles  a-l-l ---, the
Little Names, the Wannabes, the Crossover Hustlers, the Bubblegum, the
New Age Mongrels, the
Postmoderns, the Postmortems, the Multiculturalists, the Community
Outreachers, the Soundbites, the Marketing Love Couples/Traumpaars,
the Divine, the Fabulous, the Delicious, and the Little Labels That
Could all have it relatively easy in comparison to that preceding
generation. And the critical standards --- what standards? - whose?
--- have reformed, or rather, have doubled and tripled and....But
injury is often prone to insult. Hell, standards have liquified and
then evaporated vis a vis the new generation. It is no longer Sound
Music Criticism or Analysis but Lowest-Common-Denominator Public
Relations Spin [and worse: the fixation with that elusive something
known as
---technique--- technique and organization and perfection as ends in
themselves: music-making as athletic match: missing the forest for the
trees --- but this is another angle for another day]. So much so that
it has become strangely and suddenly  K-o-s-h-e-r  once more (Jesus!,
how many more times are we going to hear about market
over-saturation?) to make records (remember when you and I were
advised to please r-e-j-e-c-t, swiftly, wholesale, them records [or
anything containing Cheryl Studer --- or, for that matter, any, and we
mean any, open discourse on her art?] --- oh, you know the story ---
something
about digital and illusion and un-necessary and in-competent and
im-personal and contrived and in-experienced and un-felt and
perfect and dull and null and this and that and that and this -
beautiful even - artistic even - you know, the toxic byproduct of
uncontained
Kapitalismus - the same Kapitalismus that gave us such goodies as
Meyerbeer, penicillin, opera glasses, the megaphone, the horn, the
microphone,
the photograph, the ("fideistic") Mapleson cylinders, the phonograph,
the light bulb, animated pictures, the telegraph, the typewriter,
carbon paper, the telephone, the clock, the metronome, the radio, the
television, faster trains, the automobile, the jet plane, robots,
rockets, missiles, bombs, Star Wars, frying bacon, monaural sound,
analog tech, reel-to-reels, 8-tracks, the cassette, the LP, stereo
sound, surround sound, faxes, overnight mail, the (unfortunate and
devastating to the testimonials of a vast majority of contemporary
artists) digital tech, the PC, laptops, lapdogs, the CD, the walkman,
the minidisc, the CD-ROM, the famous (pitch re-engineered) Richter
CD-ROMs, the (disgracefully influential,
sound-engineering-bag-of-tricks-wise) DECCA/Solti Ring, naXos,
andante.com
, 12,000 other music websites, the pirates, special
effects, the VHS, HTML, the WWW, Apples, TV dinners, Windows, the cell
phone, the LD, the DVD, MP3s, Opera In The Original (that's English to
you,
naturally and perennially), CNN operas, Vilar titles, Vilar
entitlements, multitasking, micromanaging, acoustically enhanced opera
houses and concert halls, euphemisms, virtual reality, cloning,
artificial intelligence, Callas martyrs, Caruso, Ponselle, Callas,
more Callas, Flagstad, Nilsson, more EMI Callas
re-re-re-re-re-releases, yet more Sony Glenn Gould
re-re-re-re-re-compilations, etc. - and of course, the same
Kapitalismus that has transmitted the Oh So Long Anticipated, Oh So
Extensive, Oh So Very Important --- and, at last!, Oh So Necessary ---
recorded statements from, for example and randomly, Danny Boy
Barenboim,
Zubin, Ozawa, Renée, Aprile [these days reduced - or is it enhanced? -
to
croon, pathetically, opposite Danny Boy The 9.11 NYPD Singin' Cop],
Alessandra, "Marilyn Monroe Purr" Debbie (see "Ross, Alex") - (a
f-a-k-e  recording of R. Strauss' -Friedenstag- for Sinopoli/DGG ---
"...Deborah Voigt's Maria [which was in fact dubbed in after the
recording was completed, after
the original soprano had dropped out]...." -'Fanfare', Sep/Oct 2002,
p. 214), Cathy, Kathy, Jane, Ruthie Ann, "Veteran Wagnerian" Karita
(see CareerFaggot-turned-critic-turned-promoter
"Tommasini, Anthony") - (a  f-a-k-e  recording of Schoenberg's
-Gurrelieder- for Sire Simon/EMI -
http://andante.com/magazine/article.cfm?id=17979
), Violeta, Waltraud -
and much much more) ----- for naXos, Rare Opera,
Mom & Pop, even for Lucifer Classics.  No matter.
[But......we are afraid it's  t-o-o  l-a-t-e  --- because the
registers, they ain't ringin' (and all too often, we regret to
announce, not just the cash ones).]
3C. How exactly is naXos alleviating the crisis of overcrowding and
confusion among consumers? In opera titles alone, they have recorded
yet  a-n-e-w:  Boheme, Fidelio, Butterfly, Tosca, Flying Dutchman,
Barber of
Seville, Aida, Rigoletto, Magic Flute, and on and on and on. Correct
us if we are wrong but these bread and butter works were not lacking
in existing documentation, whether historical or not, hysterical or
not, distinguished or not, low end or not. And the combined sad
efforts from naXos simply do not measure up. Why pay less, then, when
you can get better and more for twice the price?
3D. "Oh but it does mean something, it does", we say. So the "average
music lover" has become the barometer of quality and relevance? Indeed
they don't deserve Muti, Abbado, or Chailly (however much they deserve
the three-minute-aria-cum-top-ten-hit). And is the Hulun Hu Tympany
Orchestra really better than Amsterdam, Dresden, Berlin or Vienna?
(although, truth be told, too many of us have heard the Vienna, for
one, play and sound like a colony of monkeys under the stick shift of
a colonized but loyal to the crown, and thus celebrated, Indian
cabbie).
3E. And Cheryl Studer, she's not one of the unwashed, is she? Were
they her contemporaries, would Mr. Heiman have singled out Callas,
Tebaldi, Sutherland, or Caballé, to name but a few, in this manner?
After all, they were/are *Daughters Of Lucifer*, to our benefit.
Presumably naXos treats its "illustrious" roster with more dignity,
respect, and vocal support. Speaking of vocal support, perhaps the
crafty (and reptilian) Mr. Heiman is unaware that *his own* Floria
Tosca (Madame Nelly Miri-a-e-i-o-u --- "más sabe el burro que tú")
reportedly bombed in the same role in Orange, France in the year 2000
a-n-d  as Norma at the ROH, London, also in 2000. However, the Tosca
and Norma catastrophes strangely failed to make a dent in the armory
of the "cognoscenti" and their media spokespeople. And it is not so
widely known that Madame M has encountered more stage catastrophes
since then. For those not "in the know", Madame M is said to be the
Bastard Child of the Incestuous Union of the Twins Callas and Heiman,
now all grown and matured into a very 'Rare Opera' singer complete
with numerous fancifully edited recordings to her name. No matter.
4. Many of us have heard naXos' Caruso edition (not that the
long-deceased tenor is remotely a Heiman discovery/original). We
wonder what Mr. Heiman's authoritative producers and editors (and his
Public Relationists) would have made of the great man today for
violating at least a couple of standards of sound conduct:
throat-clearing smack in the middle of a take and a glaring false
entry at the beginning of another? And what of the poor pianist?
Good God.
----------------------------
Considering the Grand Meltdown (not lacking the "Grand
Manner" you like) of new opera recordings on Compact Disc from the
Universal
Classics family of labels (DGG, DECCA, Philips)....and now apparently
EMI Classics too....let us take a long and hard (just as you like it,
in fact) look at the following
inventory ---
* Title role in Donizetti's Lucia di Lammermoor, rec 8/90, London SO,
Marin, Lucifer Classics
* Hanna Glawari in Lehar's Lustige Witwe, rec 1/94, Vienna PO,
Gardiner, Lucifer Classics
* Countess in Mozart's Nozze di Figaro, rec 1-2/94, Vienna PO, Abbado,
Lucifer Classics
* Countess in Mozart's Nozze di Figaro, rec 5/91, Vienna PO, Abbado,
Lucifer Classics VHS
* Title role in Rossini's Semiramide, rec 7/92, London SO, Marin,
Lucifer Classics
* Florinda in Schubert's Fierrabras, rec 5/88, Chamber Orch of Europe,
Abbado, Lucifer Classics
* Title role in R. Strauss' Salome, rec 12/90, Deutsche Oper Berlin,
Sinopoli, Lucifer Classics
* Gilda in Verdi's Rigoletto, rec 6/93, Metropolitan Opera, Levine,
Lucifer Classics
* Gilda in Verdi's Rigoletto Act III, rec 9/91, Metropolitan Opera,
Levine, Lucifer Classics
* Desdemona in Verdi's Otello, rec 5/93, Opéra Bastille, Chung,
Lucifer Classics
* Violetta in Verdi's Traviata, rec 1/91, Metropolitan Opera, Levine,
Lucifer Classics
* Elisabeth in Wagner's Tannhäuser, rec '88, Philharmonia, Sinopoli,
Lucifer Classics
* Elisabeth in Wagner's Tannhäuser, rec '89, Bayreuth, Sinopoli,
Lucifer Classics
* Senta in Wagner's fliegende Holländer, rec 1/91, Deutsche Oper
Berlin, Sinopoli, Lucifer Classics
* Gutrune in Wagner's Götterdämmerung, rec 5/89, Metropolitan Opera,
Levine, Lucifer Classics
* Title role in Floyd's Susannah, rec 3/94, Opéra de Lyon, Nagano,
Lucifer Classics
* Marguerite in Gounod's Faust, rec 2/91, Toulouse, Plasson, Lucifer
Classics
* Salomé in Massenet's Hérodiade, rec 11-12/94, Toulouse, Plasson,
Lucifer Classics
* Donna Anna in Mozart's Don Giovanni, rec 9/90, Vienna PO, Muti,
Lucifer Classics
* Konstanze in Mozart's Entführung aus dem Serail, rec 4/91, Vienna
Symphony, Weil, Lucifer Classics
* Queen of the Night in Mozart's Zauberflöte, rec 7/89, ASMF,
Marriner, Lucifer Classics
* Giulietta in Offenbach's Contes d'Hoffmann, rec 87/88/89, Dresden
Staatskapelle, Tate, Lucifer Classics
* Matilde in Rossini's Guglielmo Tell, rec 12/88, La Scala, Muti,
Lucifer Classics (also on VHS & DVD)
* Madama Cortese in Rossini's Viaggio a Reims, rec 10/92, Berlin PO,
Abbado, Lucifer Classics
* Title role in Spohr's Jessonda, rec '84, ORF Orchestra, Albrecht,
Lucifer Classics
* Chrysothemis in R. Strauss' Elektra, rec 1/90, Bavarian RSO,
Sawallisch, Lucifer Classics
* Chrysothemis in R. Strauss' Elektra, rec 6/89, Vienna PO, Abbado,
Lucifer Classics
* Empress in R. Strauss' Frau ohne Schatten, rec 2-12/87, Bavarian
RSO, Sawallisch, Lucifer Classics
* Empress in R. Strauss' Frau ohne Schatten, rec '92, Vienna PO,
Solti, Lucifer Classics
* Title role in Verdi's Aida, rec 6/94, Covent Garden, Downes,
Lucifer Classics
* Odabella in Verdi's Attila, rec 6-7/89, La Scala, Muti, Lucifer
Classics
* Odabella in Verdi's Attila, rec 6/90, La Scala, Muti, Lucifer
Classics Video
* Elena in Verdi's Vespri Siciliani, rec 12/89-1/90, La Scala, Muti,
Lucifer Classics (also on VHS & DVD)
* Drolla in Wagner's Die Feen, rec 7/83, Bavarian RSO, Sawallisch,
Lucifer Classics
* Elsa in Wagner's Lohengrin (from Bayreuth), rec 6/90, Bayreuth,
Schneider, Lucifer Classics (also on VHS)
* Elsa in Wagner's Lohengrin (from Vienna), rec '90, Vienna PO,
Abbado, Lucifer Classics VHS & DVD
* Eva in Wagner's Meistersinger, rec 4/93, Bavarian State Opera,
Sawallisch, Lucifer Classics
* Irene in Wagner's Rienzi, rec 7/83, Bavarian State Opera,
Sawallisch, Lucifer Classics
* Ortlinde in Wagner's Walküre, rec 8/81, Dresden Staatskapelle,
Janowski, Lucifer Classics
* Sieglinde in Wagner's Walküre, rec 2-3/88, Bavarian RSO, Haitink,
Lucifer Classics
* Zemlinsky's Der Geburtstagder Infantin, rec 83, Berlin RSO,
Albrecht, Lucifer Classics
* Coloratura Arias by Bellini (Sonnambula/Norma), Verdi
(Traviata/Trovatore), Donizetti (Lucia/Lucrezia Borgia), Rossini
(Barbiere/Semiramide), rec 4/89, Munich RSO, Ferro, Lucifer Classics
* Mozart Arias
(Entführung/Zauberflöte/Idomeneo/Nozze/Giovanni/Clemenza/Cosi), rec
9/89, ASMF, Marriner, Lucifer Classics
* R. Strauss' Vier Letzte Lieder/Wagner's Wesendonck-Lieder/Isolde's
Liebestod, rec 1/93, Dresden Staatskapelle, Sinopoli, Lucifer
Classics
* Isolde's Liebestod, rec 1/88, Bavarian RSO, Tate, Lucifer Classics
* Wagner Gala (Tannhäuser/Lohengrin/Meistersinger/Walküre), rec 12/93,
Berlin PO, Abbado, Lucifer Classics (also on VHS)
* First Europakonzert - in Prague (Mozart: "Non mi dir"/"Ch'io mi
scordi di te-Non temer amato bene"), rec 5/91, Berlin PO, Abbado,
Lucifer Classics HS & DVD
* Covent Garden Gala (Otello/Traviata/Fledermaus), rec 7/88, Covent
Garden, Barker, Lucifer Classics
* Sacred Works (Bach/Schubert/Mendelssohn/Handel/Mozart/Gounod/Faure/Poulenc/Bernstein/Bruch),
rec 3/91, London SO, Marin, Lucifer Classics
* Samuel Barber Songs, rec 9/92, Browning (R.I.P.), Emerson String
Quartet,
Lucifer Classics
* Beethoven's Missa Solemnis, rec 8/91, Vienna PO, Levine, Lucifer
Classics
* Beethoven in Berlin (Ah! Perfido/Choral Fantasy/Egmont), rec 12/91,
Berlin PO, Abbado, Lucifer Classics (also on VHS)
* Brahms' German Requiem, rec 10/92, Berlin PO, Abbado, Lucifer
Classics
* Schubert Lieder, rec 1/90, Gage, Lucifer Classics
* Salzburg Recital (R. Strauss/Schubert/Debussy), rec 8/92, Gage,
Lucifer Classics
* Mahler's Klagende Lied, rec 11/90, Philharmonia, Sinopoli, Lucifer
Classics
* Mahler's Symphony No. 2, rec 11/92, Vienna PO, Abbado, Lucifer
Classics
* Mahler's Symphony No. 8, rec 11-12/90, Philharmonia, Sinopoli,
Lucifer Classics
* Mahler's Symphony No. 8, rec 1/94, Berlin PO, Abbado, Lucifer
Classics
* Verdi's Requiem, rec 6/87, La Scala, Muti, Lucifer Classics
* Verdi's Requiem, rec 11/91, Vienna PO, Abbado, Lucifer Classics
* Beethoven's Symphony No. 9, rec 4/89, Philadelphia Orchestra, Muti,
Lucifer Classics
* Bruckner's Mass in F Min/Mozart's Vespers, rec 3/77, MIT Choral
Society, Oliver, Lucifer Classics
* Donizetti's Requiem, rec 1/84, Bamberg SO, Gómez-Martínez, Lucifer
Classics
* von Schweinitz's Messe Op. 21, rec 7/84, RSO Berlin, Albrecht,
Lucifer Classics
* R. Strauss Choral Works, rec 9/84, RIAS Kammerchor, Gronostay,
Creed, Lucifer Classics
"L-A  Ú-L-T-I-M-A..........que ríe, ríe mejor."
Bravissima Cheryl Studer, verlorene Tochter.  Very beautifully and
exquisitely done.  A most wonderful, exemplary, and unforgettable
legacy, a legacy of  e-x-c-e-p-t-i-o-n-a-l  q-u-a-l-i-t-y  a-n-d
d-i-s-t-i-n-c-t-i-o-n --- the work of a consummate artist.  Thank you.
Thank you for Dedication, Seriousness, and Integrity.  Thank you for
remaining True to your self, to the artform, and to  m-u-s-i-c.  Good
Music.  Thank you for a Universe of Sound and Texture and Expression
a-l-l  o-f  y-o-u-r  o-w-n.  Thank you for  g-e-n-e-r-o-s-i-t-y.
Thank you for  H-i-g-h  I-n-d-i-v-i-d-u-a-l-i-t-y.
And thank you too, Universal, EMI and Sony, for having had the
foreskin (er, foresight) to recognize and capture genius in our midst
(now that these dinosaurs' [delusional] populist causes, causes
palatable to the
Anglocentric and their Axes (oh irony!) Of Love, have caused them to
trim....ouch....their future....for that squeaky clean look and
sound....and potent-ial self-extinction).
----------------------------
And now, a little something to ponder about ---
"Things got pretty rough at the last Philharmonic concert. A bitter
battle broke out over Liszt's 'Mephisto Waltz.' It was the standees
and a part of the gallery, resolved to give their all, against the
parterre, the mountain against the marsh. On the one side we had
youth, intelligence, idealism, good judgement, enthusiasm and
conviction; on the other dullness, frivolity, debility, ignorance,
arrogance, materialism. Such were the contending forces.
There was a lot of applause, but a lot of hissing, too. Since, as we
all know, these Semitic hissing sounds traditionally served the
'chosen people' as shibboleth in combat with their neighbors, it was
not hard to determine who it was that so emphatically proclaimed both
their dissent and their identity. Indeed, these 'chosen people'
habitually make a great show of their exquisite taste. They are always
ready to recognize in Beethoven a good composer. And yet there are
those who see nothing heroic in the courage of such convictions. What,
then, can we call courageous? Let it pass. These excellent and
generous souls will surely enrich the National Guard with a doughty
legion of tailors, and thus be of service to the state. You can take
an oath on that.
To take seriously the ludicrous behavior of these worthy parterre
subscribers toward the works of a genius such as Liszt would be like
punishing children's bad manners with the rack. We are not so cruel.
But it is well to look for what it is that causes the public to behave
like an ill-mannered child and to think like a well-groomed cad. How
is it, we ask, that Liszt's compositions are rejected by the majority
of our degenerate public? The answer is made uncommonly easy for me,
since it is contained in the question. But then why, someone could
object, do Beethoven, Mozart, Haydn, etc., appeal to this same
degenerate public? The objection is so banal, the answer so obvious,
that any blockhead could handle it easily. But should someone choose
to ask me what I mean by degenerate public, I accept the challenge
gladly, and am ready with the answer: a degenerate public is one that
is content to be the ward of a degenerate press.
It is a public of newspaper readers. That is the source of all other
evils. That is the source of the thoughtlessness, frivolity,
dependence, distraction, insensibility and, above all, the bias
against those works condemned to death by the press. If this were an
ingenuous public, it would not tolerate for another day the shameful
chains it now fastens to itself voluntarily. But the habit of
cud-chewing has already become too delightful to permit the slightest
effort to use one's own teeth. Thus, this public receives its
impression of a work of art not directly, but from the review in the
newspaper, to be had in concrete form for a patent. Go then to the
apothecary, and buy yourselves some nux vomica or some other purgative
if you want to have an impression. The effect remains essentially the
same, and you spare yourselves the price of the ticket. And so a
public, the despicable tool of a despicable press, will pass judgement
on the works of a genius! A sluggardly mob that enters the concert
hall as if it were a toy store, reduces the noblest possessions of
mankind to idle diversions, and then, if that is not satisfactory,
arrogantly turns its back on the work of art and ceremoniously
hisses...fie, fie, and once again fie!!!
Given such circumstances, it is hardly surprising that Liszt's
original compositions have excited a lively 'for' and 'against'
whenever they have been played in Vienna. This time the applause from
the standees was still far from constituting a demonstration when a
few hot headed Philistines signalled, stupidly enough, the shibboleth.
That was pouring oil on fire. The applause grew louder, and rightly
so, since it was directed no less at the splendid accomplishment of
the orchestra and its conductor, Hans Richter, than at the work
itself. And did not the wonderful performance of this Lisztian
composition merit the most extravagant praise? What did Liszt's
admirers do to excite the drowsy parterre to a counter-demonstration?
They were simply giving due honor to service rendered."
Hugo Wolf
Vienna, 25 April 1886
----------------------------
A HARPSICHORD GLISTENS AND TRIUMPHS
You and I, we know the climate is profoundly  d-e-g-e-n-e-r-a-t-e
 when a nobody of a harpsichordist and her twinklin' little instrument
command more respect and accolades and analysis from 'the chosen
people' (The Rake's Progress --
http://www.operajaponica.org/reviews/dvd/rake96dvd.htm
) than those
ass-igned a certain veteran soprano. Consider this shibboleth ---
http://www.operajaponica.org/reviews/dvd/aidaroh94dvd.htm
Verdi: AIDA
Reviewed by Michael Richter, 27 May 2002
Cast: Cheryl Studer (Aida), Luciana d'Intino (Amneris), Dennis O'Neill
(Radames), Alexandru Agache (Amonasro), Robert Lloyd (Ramfis), Mark
Beesley (Il Re), John Marsden (Messenger), Yvonne Barclay
(Sacerdotta), Chorus & Orchestra of the Royal Opera House, Covent
Garden, Sir Edward Downes (conductor). Elijah Moshinsky (director)
Thus spoke our Mickey Mouse hero:
{{One can now prove that it is possible to make a performance of Aida
dull. Singing and conducting are altogether competent, but the only
elements of this release which enliven the work are those of the
production - and they are more often confusing or distracting than
constructive. Lloyd infuses some life into his character, but Beesley
is both vocally and dramatically subpar. D'Intino has some moments of
expression but they are not those most needed; the opening scene of
Act IV, for example, is flaccid. Studer, O'Neill and Agache sing all
the notes and none of the music. Many points in the score are marked
'a piacere', but the pleasure of the artists appears to be to do
nothing at all. The effect is altogether colorless - a grey and
pointless recitation of one of the most vibrant scores in opera.}}
"Things got pretty rough at the last Philharmonic concert. A bitter
battle broke out over Liszt's 'Mephisto Waltz.' It was the standees
and a part of the gallery, resolved to give their all, against the
parterre, the mountain against the marsh. On the one side we had
youth, intelligence, idealism, good judgement, enthusiasm and
conviction; on the other dullness, frivolity, debility, ignorance,
arrogance, materialism. Such were the contending forces.
There was a lot of applause, but a lot of hissing, too. Since, as we
all know, these Semitic hissing sounds traditionally served the
'chosen people' as shibboleth in combat with their neighbors, it was
not hard to determine who it was that so emphatically proclaimed both
their dissent and their identity. Indeed, these 'chosen people'
habitually make a great show of their exquisite taste. They are always
ready to recognize in Beethoven a good composer. And yet there are
those who see nothing heroic in the courage of such convictions. What,
then, can we call courageous? Let it pass. These excellent and
generous souls will surely enrich the National Guard with a doughty
legion of tailors, and thus be of service to the state. You can take
an oath on that.
To take seriously the ludicrous behavior of these worthy parterre
subscribers toward the works of a genius such as Liszt would be like
punishing children's bad manners with the rack. We are not so cruel.
But it is well to look for what it is that causes the public to behave
like an ill-mannered child and to think like a well-groomed cad. How
is it, we ask, that Liszt's compositions are rejected by the majority
of our degenerate public? The answer is made uncommonly easy for me,
since it is contained in the question. But then why, someone could
object, do Beethoven, Mozart, Haydn, etc., appeal to this same
degenerate public? The objection is so banal, the answer so obvious,
that any blockhead could handle it easily. But should someone choose
to ask me what I mean by degenerate public, I accept the challenge
gladly, and am ready with the answer: a degenerate public is one that
is content to be the ward of a degenerate press.
It is a public of newspaper readers. That is the source of all other
evils. That is the source of the thoughtlessness, frivolity,
dependence, distraction, insensibility and, above all, the bias
against those works condemned to death by the press. If this were an
ingenuous public, it would not tolerate for another day the shameful
chains it now fastens to itself voluntarily. But the habit of
cud-chewing has already become too delightful to permit the slightest
effort to use one's own teeth. Thus, this public receives its
impression of a work of art not directly, but from the review in the
newspaper, to be had in concrete form for a patent. Go then to the
apothecary, and buy yourselves some nux vomica or some other purgative
if you want to have an impression. The effect remains essentially the
same, and you spare yourselves the price of the ticket. And so a
public, the despicable tool of a despicable press, will pass judgement
on the works of a genius! A sluggardly mob that enters the concert
hall as if it were a toy store, reduces the noblest possessions of
mankind to idle diversions, and then, if that is not satisfactory,
arrogantly turns its back on the work of art and ceremoniously
hisses...fie, fie, and once again fie!!!
Given such circumstances, it is hardly surprising that Liszt's
original compositions have excited a lively 'for' and 'against'
whenever they have been played in Vienna. This time the applause from
the standees was still far from constituting a demonstration when a
few hot headed Philistines signalled, stupidly enough, the shibboleth.
That was pouring oil on fire. The applause grew louder, and rightly
so, since it was directed no less at the splendid accomplishment of
the orchestra and its conductor, Hans Richter, than at the work
itself. And did not the wonderful performance of this Lisztian
composition merit the most extravagant praise? What did Liszt's
admirers do to excite the drowsy parterre to a counter-demonstration?
They were simply giving due honor to service rendered."
Hugo Wolf
Vienna, 25 April 1886
----------------------------
M-U-S-I-C OF THE FUTURE
Berg, Alban / Wozzeck / Marie
Cajkovskij, Pëtr Il'ic / Evgenij Onegin / Tatjana
Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus / Così fan tutte / Fiordiligi
Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus / Don Giovanni / Donna Elvira
Puccini, Giacomo / Manon Lescaut / Manon Lescaut
Puccini, Giacomo / Tosca / Tosca
Strauss, Richard / Capriccio / Gräfin
Strauss, Richard / Salome / Salome
Verdi, Giuseppe / Ballo in Maschera, Un / Amelia
Verdi, Giuseppe / Don Carlo / Elisabetta
MORE M-U-S-I-C....REDIVIVUS
Beethoven, Ludwig van / Fidelio / Leonore
Lehár, Franz / Lustige Witwe, Die / Hanna Glawari
Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus / Idomeneo / Elettra
Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus / Nozze di Figaro, Le / Contessa d'Almaviva
Strauss, Richard / Elektra / Chrysothemis
Verdi, Giuseppe / Aida / Aida
Verdi, Giuseppe / Otello / Desdemona
Wagner, Richard / Meistersinger von Nürnberg / Eva
AND YET MORE M-U-S-I-C
Strauss, Richard / Arabella / Arabella
Strauss, Richard / Ariadne auf Naxos / Primadonna/Ariadne
Strauss, Richard / Frau ohne Schatten, Die / Kaiserin
Strauss, Richard / Rosenkavalier, Der / Marschallin
Wagner, Richard / fliegende Holländer, Der / Senta
Wagner, Richard / Lohengrin / Elsa von Brabant
Wagner, Richard / Tannhäuser / Elisabeth
Wagner, Richard / Walküre, Die / Sieglinde
----------------------------
"The dangers of life
are infinite
And safety is among them."
--- Goethe


title: HAPPY BIRTHDAY DONALD GRAMM/EMMA KIRKBY

author: Valfer

text:
A Pineiro by any other name is still a Pineiro.  The smell remains the same.
Valfer
jerryw...@yahoo.com
 (Gerald Waldman) wrote in message news:<
30aaebfc.03022...@posting.google.com
>...
(Verbal diarrhea deleted)


title: HAPPY BIRTHDAY DONALD GRAMM/EMMA KIRKBY

author: Skip

text:
Did you visit his site?
http://profiles.yahoo.com/pineiro_gabriel
"Valfer" <Val...@MSN.com> wrote in message
news:ad3a18ad.03022...@posting.google.com...

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com
).
Version: 6.0.456 / Virus Database: 256 - Release Date: 2/18/03


title: HAPPY BIRTHDAY DONALD GRAMM/EMMA KIRKBY

text:
I would rather suffer ten thousand red ants to invade my underpants.
Valfer
"Skip" <skipnospam＼
nyc.rr.com
> wrote in message news:<%_P7a.50461$
ma2.15...@twister.nyc.rr.com
>...



title: HAPPY BIRTHDAY DONALD GRAMM/EMMA KIRKBY

text:
I know what you mean.......
"Valfer" <Val...@MSN.com> wrote in message
news:ad3a18ad.03030...@posting.google.com...



title: proposta sul Milton di Spontini

text:
è un po' che ci pensavo:
siccome il Milton (dal quale deriva il mio nick) di Spontini è un assoluto
capolavoro,secondo me (e varie altre persone),e siccome qui,a parte
Rudy,nessun altro lo conosce pensavo di diffonderlo.
Possiedo una registrazione RAI ,mai stampata su Cd e personalmente da me
riversata su supporto digitale,dopo averla registrata alla radio.
Se ciò è consentito dalla legge (ma non dovrebbero esserci problemi perchè
la registrazione non è mai stata pubblicata ed è inesistente una qualsiasi
altra edizione dell'opera)vorrei iniziare  per quest'opera una catena:
tutti coloro che hanno intenzione di ascoltare la musica  potranno
iscriversi alla lista che propongo.
Io manderò una copia del Milton al primo della lista,il quale manderà una
copia a sua volta al secondo e così via.
TUTTO CIO' NON A FINI DI LUCRO,in primis.
Inoltre TUTTO CIO' SOLO se non crea problemi legali.
Altrimenti non se ne fa niente.
Ripeto:non voglio avere grane legali;
pertanto il discorso è valido se e solo se non ci sono problemi.
Si tratta di un solo Cd.Il libretto è disponibile in file PDF.
questo il mio indirizzo al quale potete segnalarmi vostre osservazioni
Pamil...@NOSPAMaltavista.it
(togliere NOSPAM)
Prego solo di farmi sapere al più presto la vostra disponibilità,perchè da
sabato sarò assente nuovamente dal NG credo per lungo tempo.
Pamilt0n