[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 124 (Thursday, June 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38799-38800]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15464]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0116; Notice 2]

BMW of North America, LLC, a Subsidiary of BMW AG, Grant of
Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Grant of Petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: BMW of North America, LLC (BMW) \1\, a subsidiary of BMW AG
\2\, Munich, Germany, has determined that certain model year (MY) 2012
MINI Cooper Countryman passenger cars with optional three passenger
rear seating and manufactured between August 1, 2011 and May 23, 2012,
do not fully comply with paragraph S4.3 (b) of Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 110, Tire selection and rims and motor
home/recreation vehicle trailer load carrying capacity information for
motor vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less.
BMW has filed an appropriate report dated June 1, 2012, pursuant to 49
CFR Part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ BMW of North America, LLC is a U.S. company that
manufactures and imports motor vehicles.
    \2\ BMW AG is a German company that manufactures motor vehicles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and the rule
implementing those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556, BMW has petitioned
for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49
U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Notice of receipt of the
petition was published, with a 30-day public comment period, on
September 13, 2012 in the Federal Register (77 FR 56700). No comments
were received. To view the petition and all supporting documents log
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at: http://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online search instructions to
locate docket number ``NHTSA-2012-0116.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information on this
decision contact Ms. Amina Fisher, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance,
the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone
(202) 366-5307.
    Vehicles Involved: Affected are approximately 5,700 MY 2012 MINI
Cooper Countryman passenger vehicles with optional three passenger rear
seating manufactured between August 1, 2011 and May 23, 2012.
    Summary of BMW'S Analyses: BMW explains that the noncompliance is
that the vehicle placard on the affected vehicles incorrectly
identifies the rear designated seating capacity as ``2'' when in fact
it should be ``3,'' and the total designated seating capacity as ``4''
when in fact it should be ``5.''
    BMW states that while the vehicle placard incorrectly identifies
the vehicle seating capacity, this noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety for the following reasons:
    1. It would become clear to a vehicle owner that the rear seat of
an affected vehicle contains three sets of seat belts, provides
adequate space for three people to occupy the rear seat and that the
vehicle in fact does accommodate five passengers not four as labeled.
    2. The tire pressure value on the vehicle placard is correct. In
fact, the recommended tire inflation pressure for both the five
passenger and the four passenger vehicles is the same. Therefore, there
is no risk of under-inflation.
    3. The vehicle capacity weight listed on the vehicle placard is
correct, and is the same for Countryman model vehicles built for four
or five occupants. Therefore, there is no risk of overloading.
    4. The vehicle's Monroney label \3\ contains a listing of all
options that have been equipped on the affected vehicles. The option
regarding the rear seat for three occupants is noted on the Monroney
label; therefore, an owner would have been notified at time of purchase
of the vehicle that the rear seat is equipped to accommodate three
occupants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Automobile Information Disclosure Act (AIDA), 15 U.S.C.
1231-1233.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. The vehicle Owner's Manual contains information pertaining to
the vehicle's tires, tire pressure and the vehicle capacity weight.
Therefore, if owners check the Owner's Manual, correct information is
available for their use.
    6. BMW also provides vehicle drivers with help determining the
correct tire, tire pressure and loading information by way of toll-free
telephone numbers for MINI Roadside Assistance\TM\ (available 24 hours/
day) and MINI Customer Relations.
    7. BMW has received no customer complaints and is unaware of any
accidents or injuries regarding this noncompliance of the affected
vehicles.
    BMW has additionally informed NHTSA that it has corrected future
production and that all other required markings are present and
correct.
    In summation, BMW believes that the described noncompliance of the
subject vehicles is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that
its petition, to exempt from providing recall notification of
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.
    Background Requirement: Section Sec.  4.3 (b) of FMVSS No. 110
specifically states:

    Sec.  4.3 Placard. Each vehicle, except for a trailer or
incomplete vehicle, shall show the information specified in Sec.
4.3 (a) through (g), . . . , on a placard permanently affixed to the
driver's side B-pillar . . .
    (b) Designated seated capacity (expressed in terms of total
number of occupants and number of occupants for each front and rear
seat location); . . .

    NHTSA Decision: NHTSA has reviewed BMW's analyses that the
noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. NHTSA agrees
that understating the number of rear seat occupants poses little safety
risk, and vehicle owners will observe three seat belts and correctly
identify three seating positions. BMW has provided sufficient
documentation that the vehicle placard does comply with all other
safety performance requirements. Since the vehicle placard clearly
states the correct vehicle capacity weight and tire inflation pressure
and NHTSA has verified both are compatible with five occupants, there
is little risk of vehicle overloading.
    In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has decided that BMW has
met its burden of persuasion and that the subject FMVSS No. 110
noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Accordingly,
BMW's petition is hereby granted, and BMW is exempted from the
obligation of providing notification of, and a remedy for, that
noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.

    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this decision
only applies to approximately 5,700 vehicles that BMW no longer
controlled at the time that it determined that a noncompliance existed
in the subject vehicles. However, the granting of this petition does
not relieve vehicle distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the
sale, offer for sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into
interstate commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control
after BMW notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.

    Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8)

    Issued On: June 19, 2013.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2013-15464 Filed 6-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register: January 29, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 18)]
[Notices]
[Page 5177-5178]
[DOCID:fr29ja09-80]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1816-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

Vermont; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Vermont (FEMA-1816-DR), dated January 14,
2009, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: January 14, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated January 14, 2009, the President issued a major disaster
declaration under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5207 (the Stafford
Act), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State
of Vermont resulting from a severe winter storm during the period of
December 11-18, 2008, is of sufficient severity and magnitude to
warrant a major

disaster declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5207 (the Stafford
Act). Therefore, I declare that such a major disaster exists in the
State of Vermont.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Public Assistance in the
designated areas, Hazard Mitigation throughout the State, and any
other forms of assistance under the Stafford Act that you deem
appropriate. Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance
be supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act
for Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation will be limited to 75
percent of the total eligible costs. If Other Needs Assistance under
Section 408 of the Stafford Act is later requested and warranted,
Federal funding under that program will also be limited to 75
percent of the total eligible costs.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
to the extent allowable under the Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, Mark H. Landry, of FEMA is appointed
to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major disaster.
    The following areas of the State of Vermont have been designated as
adversely affected by this major disaster:

    Bennington and Windham Counties for Public Assistance.
    All counties within the State of Vermont are eligible to apply
for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-1881 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: April 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 64)]
[Notices]
[Page 17151-17152]
[DOCID:fr05ap10-70]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2009-0001]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request, OMB No. 1660--NEW; FEMA Preparedness Grants:
Buffer Zone Protection Program (BZPP)

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice; 30-day notice and request for comments; new information
collection; OMB No. 1660--NEW; FEMA Form 089-23, Buffer Zone Plan; FEMA
Form 089-23A, Vulnerability Reduction Purchasing Plan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has submitted
the information collection abstracted below to the Office of Management
and Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The submission describes the
nature of the information collection, the categories of respondents,
the estimated burden (i.e., the time, effort and resources used by
respondents to respond) and cost, and the actual data collection
instruments FEMA will use.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before May 5, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the proposed information
collection

to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the Desk Officer
for the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, and sent via electronic mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection should be made to Director,
Records Management Division, 1800 South Bell Street, Arlington, VA
20598-3005, facsimile number<PHONE_NUMBER>, or e-mail address FEMA-
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Collection of Information

    Title: FEMA Preparedness Grants: Buffer Zone Protection Program
(BZPP).
    Type of information collection: New information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-NEW.
    Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA Form 089-23, Buffer Zone Plan; FEMA
Form 089-23A, Vulnerability Reduction Purchasing Plan.
    Abstract: The information collection activity is the collection of
financial and programmatic information from States and local
governments pertaining to grant and cooperative agreement awards that
include application, program narrative statement, grant award,
performance information, outlay reports, property management, and
closeout information. The information enables FEMA to evaluate
applications and make award decisions, monitor ongoing performance and
manage the flow of federal funds, and to appropriately close out grants
or cooperative agreements. The Buffer Zone Plan (BZP) is a narrative
plan that includes an assessment of possible infrastructure security
risks and documents the degree to which security processes and
procedures are in place, including planning to enhance and/or improve
site security and the actions jurisdictions undertake in their BZP to
protect against or prevent terrorist attacks at Critical Infrastructure
and Key Resources (CIKR). The Vulnerability Reduction Purchasing Plan
is a plan applicants prepare that corresponds to the Buffer Zone Plan
and lists procurement items including equipment, information
technology, and other resources such as training, that are needed to
improve or enhance a jurisdiction's preventive or protective posture
around CIKR sites identified in the BZP.
    Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 500 hours.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Average Hour Burden per Respondent: 16 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 4,000 hours.
    Estimated Cost: There is no annual reporting or recordkeeping costs
associated with this collection.

    Dated: March 25, 2010.
Larry Gray
Director, Records Management Division, Mission Support Bureau, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2010-7558 Filed 4-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-78-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63941-63943]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26830]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-84733; File No. SR-CHX-2018-06]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend CHX Article 22, Rule 6(a)

December 6, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that, on November 27, 2018, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX''
or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend CHX Article 22, Rule 6(a) to remove
the requirement that the Exchange file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') a Form 19b-4(e) for each ``new
derivative securities product'' that will commence trading on the
Exchange pursuant to unlisted trading privileges. The proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend CHX Article 22,
Rule 6(a) to remove the requirement that the Exchange file with the
Commission a Form 19b-4(e) for each ``new derivative securities
product'' that will commence trading on the Exchange pursuant to
unlisted trading privileges. The Exchange notes that a substantially
identical proposed rule change by NYSE National, Inc. (``NYSE
National'') was recently approved by the Commission.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83289 (May 17,
2018), 83 FR 23968 (May 23, 2018) (Order Approving File No. SR-
NYSENat-2018-02).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CHX Article 22, Rule 6(a) sets forth the requirement for the
Exchange to file with the Commission a Form 19b-4(e) with respect to
each ``new derivative securities product'' that is traded pursuant to
unlisted trading privileges. However, the Exchange believes that it
should not be necessary to file a Form 19b-4(e) with the Commission if
it begins trading a ``new derivative securities product'' pursuant to
unlisted trading privileges, because Rule 19b-4(e)(1) under the Act
refers to the ``listing and trading'' of a ``new derivative securities
product.'' The Exchange believes that the requirements of that rule
refer to when an exchange lists and trades a ``new derivative
securities product'', and not when an exchange seeks only to trade such
product pursuant to unlisted trading privileges pursuant to Rule 12f-2
under the Act.\5\ Therefore, the Exchange proposes to delete the
requirement in Article 22, Rule 6(a) for the Exchange to file a Form
19b-4(e) with the Commission with respect to each ``new derivative
securities product'' it begins trading pursuant to unlisted trading
privileges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 240.12f-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6(b) \6\ of the Act in general, and
furthers the

objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \7\ in particular, in that it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. Specifically, eliminating the requirement to file a
Form 19b-4(e) for each ``new derivative securities product'' the
Exchange begins trading on an unlisted trading privileges basis removes
an unnecessary regulatory requirement thereby providing for a more
efficient process for adding a ``new derivative securities product'' to
trading on the Exchange on an unlisted trading privileges basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, the Commission recently approved a substantially
identical proposed rule change by NYSE National.\8\ In particular, the
Commission noted in the approval order that it ``believes that the
filing of a Form 19b-4(e) is not required when an Exchange is trading a
new derivative securities product on a UTP basis only'' \9\ and also
found that the NYSE National's proposed rule change is ``consistent
with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.'' \10\ The Nasdaq
Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq''), Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``PHLX''), Nasdaq BX,
Inc. (``BX'') and Investors Exchange LLC (``IEX'') also recently
amended their rules to remove the requirement to file with the
Commission a Form 19b-4(e) for each ``new derivative securities
product'' traded on each of those exchanges pursuant to unlisted
trading privileges.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83289 (May 17,
2018), 83 FR 23968 (May 23, 2018) (Order Approving File No. SR-
NYSENat-2018-02).
    \9\ See supra note 8 at page 23975 at footnote 149.
    \10\ See supra note 8 at page 23975-6.
    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 84488 (October 25,
2018), 83 FR 54801 (October 31, 2018) (SR-NASDAQ-2018-082); 84542
(November 6, 2018), 83 FR 56385 (November 13, 2018) (SR-Phlx-2018-
67); 84546 (November 7, 2018), 83 FR 56888 (November 14, 2018) (SR-
BX-2018-051); and 83609 (July 9, 2018), 83 FR 32704 (July 13, 2018)
(SR-IEX-2018-14).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For these reasons, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change
is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the contrary, removing
the requirement to file a Form 19b-4(e) will serve to enhance
competition by providing for the efficient addition of new derivative
securities products for trading pursuant to unlisted trading privileges
on the Exchange. To the extent that a competitor marketplace believes
that the proposed rule change places it at a competitive disadvantage,
it may file with the Commission a proposed rule change to adopt the
same or similar rule.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; or (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \12\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative
delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately upon
filing. The Commission notes that CHX's proposal does not present any
new or novel issues. Thus, the Commission believes that waiver of the
30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest and hereby waives the 30-day operative delay
and designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon
filing.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CHX-2018-06 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2018-06. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE, Washington,
DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2018-06 and should be submitted on
or before January 2, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-26830 Filed 12-11-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P