ID Stations # Years # FC < 14 # EN < 35 FC < 14;

EN < 35 FC < 14;

EN > 35 FC > 14;

EN < 35 FC > 14;

EN > 35 ITCARKEEKP Carkeek Park 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 JSVW04 Richmond Beach 10 0 4 0 0 4 6 JSWX01 Richmond Beach 6 4 5 4 0 1 1 KSHZ03 Carkeek Park 10 1 3 1 0 2 7 KSJX02 Blue Ridge Beach Park 4 2 4 2 0 2 0 KSLU03 Golden Gardens Park 10 1 6 1 0 5 4 KSQU01 Shilshole Bay 10 1 10 1 0 9 0 KSSN04 West Point 10 5 8 5 0 3 2 KSSN05 West Point 10 6 10 6 0 4 0 KSXS02 Magnolia 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 KSYV02 Magnolia 10 5 8 5 0 3 2 LSFX01 Duwamish Head 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 LSGY01 Seacrest Park 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 LSHV01 West Seattle 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 LSKR01 Alki Point 10 1 6 1 0 5 4 LSKS01 Alki Point 10 0 8 0 0 8 2 LSTU01 Lincoln Park 10 9 10 9 0 1 0 LSVW01 Fauntleroy Cove 10 1 9 1 0 8 1 LTAB01 Inner Elliott Bay 10 9 10 9 0 1 0 LTEH02 Inner Elliott Bay 10 4 10 4 0 6 0 MSJL01 Vashon Island  Gorsuch Creek 3 0 1 0 0 1 2 MSSM05 Vashon Island  Tramp Harbor 10 1 2 1 0 1 8 MTEC01 Seahurst Park 9 1 2 1 0 1 7 MTLD03 Normandy Park 7 2 3 2 0 1 4 JSTU01 Richmond Beach 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 KSIW02 Carkeed Park 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 LTED04 Elliott Bay 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 PTWELLS1 Point Wells 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 VO50E Vashon TP Outfall 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 KSSK02 West Point TP Outfall 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 LTBC40 Denny Way CSO Outfall 8 7 8 7 0 1 0 TOTALS 241 124 191 124 0 67 50 King County Nearshore Marine Water Bacteria Data January 1995 through August 2004  Summer Only Summer ( June thru Sept) Geometric Means King County, WA Summer Geometric Mean Bacteria  1995 to 2004 All Nearshore Stations 0.0000 0.5000 1.0000 1.5000 2.0000 2.5000 3.0000 0.0000 0.5000 1.0000 1.5000 2.0000 2.5000 3.0000 3.5000 4.0000 Fecal Coliform ( log 10)

Enterococci (

log 10) N = 0 N = 50 N = 67 N = 125 Enterococci = 35 Fecal =

14 SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Predictions Multiple R 0.694585 FC EN R Square 0.482449 14 3 Adjusted R 0.478004  95% 3 Standard E 49.47667 + 95% 4 Observation 226 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 1 513429.8 513429.8 209.7395 5.5E 34 Residual 225 550786.7 2447.941 Total 226 1064216 Coefficientstandard Erro t Stat P value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%

Intercept 0 # N/ A # N/ A # N/ A # N/ A # N/ A # N/ A # N/ A Fecal Colifo 0.225375 0.013012 17.32085 2.8E 43 0.199735 0.251016 0.199735 0.251016 RESIDUAL OUTPUT Observationicted Entero Residuals 1 1.3198 3.579179 2 0.902671 1.446339 3 0.530118 1.403064 4 1.674304 6.28381 5 3.552442 14.99049 6 15.2937 7.196371 7 75.38782 1.816871 8 19.2342 23.18403 9 10.08564 7.931031 10 14.5168 37.58835 11 9.122852 30.67597 12 10.24513 48.5212 13 13.37421 37.62213 14 4.418637  2.028521 15 4.746511 62.83002 16 2.238038 10.76443 17 4.287892 4.359741 18 1.269906 14.09128 19 2.823687 2.040912 20 0.573745 1.941122 21 31.31278 95.58513 22 23.3731 24.83542 23 28.71971 15.3326 24 7.433558 11.84336 25 12.24928 28.14969 26 15.02971 36.75272 27 28.06053 96.17959 28 9.911508 26.18609 29 2.56526 7.931432 30 6.066217 19.54537 31 3.993695 8.529356 32 1.733361 6.46159 33 1.925517 2.368559 34 4.958257 8.041743 35 19.87395 1.892258 36 16.43127 10.46788 Fecal Coliform Line Fit Plot 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 0 1000 2000 3000 Fecal Coliform Enterococci 37 41.99258 1.632253 38 11.86368 9.684974 39 18.54761 5.391659 40 24.09796 38.51525 41 26.06941 139.9575 42 5.333073 48.59229 43 3.247628 25.19432 44 3.769829 6.135953 45 4.426466 3.023215 46 8.249628  3.275833 47 10.50347  2.0035 48 5.481278  3.799485 49 2.004382 0.374032 50 16.4271  8.759787 51 6.798946  1.557463 52 10.81052  3.818767 53 6.415614 0.162122 54 4.278174 0.963309 55 18.11701 41.43239 56 1.328764 4.482136 57 8.986778 14.44909 58 1.316462 1.981252 59 10.23615 2.254525 60 2.613001 11.5739 61 12.41075 32.01992 62 3.235465 3.216417 63 6.782375 12.07156 64 0.225375 0.774625 65 7.1438 17.16053 66 8.526112  3.831638 67 2.076058 7.04197 68 5.398806 1.370666 69 1.195605 1.350125 70 2.888999 2.060233 71 1.352252 2.956617 72 2.346008  1.000108 73 3.391814 4.177852 74 1.810018 1.922493 75 1.577261 1.126509 76 3.373638 2.662341 77 8.870098 7.841718 78 8.2689 4.492355 79 9.261116 42.47552 80 14.79266 28.03989 81 2.773428 8.809494 82 2.579501 1.739614 83 4.273164 11.15453 84 1.329743 3.513172 85 0.712699 2.367371 86 2.131555 26.40978 87 2.670478 3.810262 88 2.358857  0.145494 89 0.390362 2.877218 90 2.358857  0.145494 91 0.225375 1.591745 92 1.522027 2.088847 93 1.384849 4.132999 94 1.521844  0.10763 95 0.50123 1.086171 96 0.919904 0.897216 97 2.178886 0.649541 98 0.498838 0.501162 99 0.573745 0.426255 100 0.337015 0.662985 101 0.283955 0.975966 102 0.610949 0.578258 103 1.250946  0.250946 104 0.637458 0.362542 105 0.628294 0.913916 106 0.750499 0.791711 107 1.536455 2.031166 108 0.283955 1.426021 109 1.392184 3.557048 110 1.436407 0.49793 111 0.650095 1.639334 112 1.126426 0.988317 113 0.283955 0.716045 114 0.283955 1.716045 115 33.39418  1.879532 116 38.89953  10.18438 117 17.0925 0.361657 118 6.877014 11.72266 119 9.91414 18.51668 120 22.98675 47.82969 121 29.00822 60.45291 122 23.62768 79.59053 123 21.35177 16.64845 124 2.030231 2.278638 125 15.76045 11.89605 126 60.95181  37.09494 127 25.3966 13.86442 128 42.88077 47.05977 129 10.26053  2.116057 130 16.83859  10.89494 131 23.12318  15.22874 132 7.712673 1.021541 133 5.55058  3.059118 134 3.634068 3.53805 135 1.71717 2.267112 136 5.825557  1.991898 137 1.174894 3.797606 138 3.048616 0.113662 139 1.3198 1.391006 140 1.076235 1.038507 141 0.552055 0.447945 142 1.853135 1.650564 143 0.225375 1.339709 144 0.485556 0.514444 145 56.00043  39.91897 146 52.71407  43.18713 147 122.6998  54.33013 148 32.94913  9.22876 149 13.95889  3.801756 150 35.66674  12.0302 151 12.11651  2.096566 152 66.82257  44.66246 153 2.586984 3.467816 154 4.851039 8.057108 155 0.928441 1.984509 156 2.116389 0.07355 157 5.361641 1.699055 158 2.170356 1.053354 159 1.142332 1.640826 160 0.825514 1.38785 161 1.488346  0.228425 162 0.464221 0.535779 163 1.15926 0.522533 164 0.225375 0.774625 165 8.028189  2.028189 166 6.850234 13.47769 167 20.58182  2.982337 168 6.160174  1.539118 169 2.164337 2.436316 170 2.376786 0.777556 171 4.897286 0.531549 172 3.11524 5.006933 173 1.577627  0.577627 174 8.526534 4.400074 175 16.42032 45.15023 176 18.2166 315.4544 177 3.971505 28.99878 178 38.6739 148.1722 179 18.83027 18.09231 180 51.0939  24.67494 181 42.30278 120.5422 182 643.7548  269.2 183 174.3607 18.16608 184 397.4811 215.8438 185 57.7498 166.3956 186 12.46932 125.0962 187 1.779214 15.16176 188 36.20846 17.14136 189 24.92099 139.2407 190 32.36 22.61617 191 10.02112 103.2863 192 236.8586 143.5627 193 9.711129 282.6517 194 9.050024 124.0836 195 10.92918 14.51749 196 0.819068 2.913443 197 38.31381 41.68619 198 15.99982 62.70584 199 26.72415 26.64984 200 9.52136 37.34429 201 9.432579 11.05242 202 2.781795 24.92873 203 1.339613 2.44015 204 0.225375 0.774625 205 0.318729 0.681271 206 0.325047 0.674953 207 0.296611 0.703389 208 0.225375 0.774625 209 0.770773 0.489148 210 0.54818 0.45182 211 0.464221 0.851853 212 0.674029 0.515178 213 0.50892 1.656817 214 0.225375 0.774625 215 0.390362 0.925712 216 1.159007 3.482582 217 0.225375 0.774625 218 0.225375 0.774625 219 0.225375 0.774625 220 0.225375 0.774625 221 0.225375 0.774625 222 0.325047 0.674953 223 0.225375 0.923323 224 0.225375 0.774625 225 0.225375 0.774625 226 0.225375 0.774625 3000 King County Nearshore Marine Water Bacteria Data January 1995 through August 2004  Summer Only Summer ( June thru Sept) Geometric Means Station Summer Fecal Coliform Log FC Enterococci Log EN FC < 14 EN < 35 ITCARKEEKP 2001 4 0.6026 2 0.3709 1 1 ITCARKEEKP 2003 2 0.3715 2 0.2863 1 1 ITCARKEEKP 2004 7 0.8709 8 0.9008 1 1 JSVW04 1995 16 1.1976 19 1.2682 1 JSVW04 1996 68 1.8316 22 1.3520 1 JSVW04 1997 334 2.5244 77 1.8876 JSVW04 1998 85 1.9312 42 1.6276 JSVW04 1999 45 1.6508 18 1.2557 1 JSVW04 2000 64 1.8090 52 1.7169 JSVW04 2001 40 1.6072 40 1.5999 JSVW04 2002 45 1.6576 59 1.7691 JSVW04 2003 59 1.7734 51 1.7075 JSVW04 2004 20 1.2924 2 0.3784 1 JSWX01 1995 21 1.3235 68 1.8298 JSWX01 1996 10 0.9970 13 1.1140 1 1 JSWX01 1997 19 1.2793 9 0.9369 1 JSWX01 1998 6 0.7509 15 1.1864 1 1 JSWX01 1999 13 1.0979 5 0.6870 1 1 JSWX01 2000 3 0.4058 3 0.4005 1 1 KSHZ03 1995 139 2.1428 127 2.1035 KSHZ03 1996 104 2.0158 48 1.6831 KSHZ03 1997 127 2.1053 44 1.6440 KSHZ03 1998 33 1.5183 19 1.2850 1 KSHZ03 1999 54 1.7352 40 1.6064 KSHZ03 2000 67 1.8240 52 1.7142 KSHZ03 2001 125 2.0952 124 2.0943 KSHZ03 2002 44 1.6432 36 1.5575 KSHZ03 2003 11 1.0562 10 1.0211 1 1 KSHZ03 2004 27 1.4300 26 1.4084 1 KSJX02 1995 18 1.2485 13 1.0977 1 KSJX02 1996 8 0.8860 8 0.9135 1 1 KSJX02 2000 9 0.9316 4 0.6329 1 1 KSJX02 2001 22 1.3424 13 1.1139 1 KSLU03 1995 88 1.9454 22 1.3378 1 KSLU03 1996 73 1.8628 27 1.4297 1 KSLU03 1997 186 2.2703 44 1.6397 KSLU03 1998 53 1.7213 22 1.3334 1 KSLU03 1999 82 1.9154 24 1.3791 1 KSLU03 2000 107 2.0291 63 1.7967 KSLU03 2001 116 2.0632 166 2.2202 KSLU03 2002 24 1.3741 54 1.7318 KSLU03 2003 14 1.1587 28 1.4540 1 1 KSLU03 2004 17 1.2234 10 0.9959 1 KSQU01 1995 20 1.2932 7 0.8721 1 KSQU01 1996 37 1.5635 5 0.6967 1 KSQU01 1997 47 1.6684 8 0.9294 1 KSQU01 1998 24 1.3860 2 0.2258 1 KSQU01 1999 9 0.9491 2 0.3763 1 1 KSQU01 2000 73 1.8627 8 0.8846 1 KSQU01 2001 30 1.4795 5 0.7195 1 KSQU01 2002 48 1.6809 7 0.8446 1 KSQU01 2003 28 1.4543 7 0.8181 1 KSQU01 2004 19 1.2784 5 0.7195 1 KSSN04 1995 80 1.9052 60 1.7749 KSSN04 1996 6 0.7705 6 0.7642 1 1 KSSN04 1997 40 1.6007 23 1.3699 1 KSSN04 1998 6 0.7665 3 0.5182 1 1 KSSN04 1999 45 1.6572 12 1.0966 1 KSSN04 2000 12 1.0642 14 1.1519 1 1 KSSN04 2001 55 1.7409 44 1.6477 KSSN04 2002 14 1.1570 6 0.8097 1 1 KSSN04 2003 30 1.4785 19 1.2754 1 KSSN04 2004 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 KSSN05 1995 32 1.5010 24 1.3857 1 KSSN05 1996 38 1.5778 5 0.6716 1 KSSN05 1997 9 0.9643 9 0.9599 1 1 KSSN05 1998 24 1.3794 7 0.8306 1 KSSN05 1999 5 0.7247 3 0.4058 1 1 KSSN05 2000 13 1.1078 5 0.6945 1 1 KSSN05 2001 6 0.7782 4 0.6344 1 1 KSSN05 2002 10 1.0174 1 0.1290 1 1 KSSN05 2003 15 1.1775 8 0.8791 1 KSSN05 2004 8 0.9048 4 0.5720 1 1 KSXS02 1995 7 0.8450 3 0.4320 1 1 KSXS02 1996 15 1.1752 6 0.7807 1 1 KSYV02 1995 39 1.5950 17 1.2230 1 KSYV02 1996 37 1.5645 13 1.1059 1 KSYV02 1997 41 1.6138 52 1.7138 KSYV02 1998 66 1.8171 43 1.6318 KSYV02 1999 12 1.0901 12 1.0638 1 1 KSYV02 2000 11 1.0586 4 0.6354 1 1 KSYV02 2001 19 1.2778 15 1.1883 1 KSYV02 2002 6 0.7709 5 0.6851 1 1 KSYV02 2003 3 0.5000 3 0.4886 1 1 KSYV02 2004 9 0.9758 29 1.4555 1 1 LSFX01 1995 12 1.0737 6 0.8116 1 1 LSFX01 1996 10 1.0198 2 0.3451 1 1 LSFX01 1997 2 0.2386 3 0.5142 1 1 LSFX01 1998 10 1.0198 2 0.3451 1 1 LSFX01 1999 1 0.0000 2 0.2594 1 1 LSFX01 2000 7 0.8295 4 0.5576 1 1 LSFX01 2001 6 0.7885 6 0.7418 1 1 LSFX01 2002 7 0.8295 1 0.1505 1 1 LSFX01 2003 2 0.3471 2 0.2007 1 1 LSFX01 2004 4 0.6108 2 0.2594 1 1 LSGY01 1997 10 0.9853 3 0.4515 1 1 LSGY01 1998 2 0.3451 1 0.0000 1 1 LSGY01 1999 3 0.4058 1 0.0000 1 1 LSGY01 2000 1 0.1747 1 0.0000 1 1 LSGY01 2001 1 0.1003 1 0.1003 1 1 LSGY01 2002 3 0.4331 1 0.0753 1 1 LSGY01 2003 6 0.7443 1 0.0000 1 1 LSGY01 2004 3 0.4515 1 0.0000 1 1 LSHV01 1995 3 0.4453 2 0.1881 1 1 LSHV01 1996 3 0.5224 2 0.1881 1 1 LSHV01 1997 7 0.8336 4 0.5524 1 1 LSHV01 1998 1 0.1003 2 0.2330 1 1 LSHV01 1999 6 0.7908 5 0.6945 1 1 LSHV01 2000 6 0.8044 2 0.2865 1 1 LSHV01 2001 3 0.4601 2 0.3597 1 1 LSHV01 2002 5 0.6988 2 0.3253 1 1 LSHV01 2003 1 0.1003 1 0.0000 1 1 LSHV01 2004 1 0.1003 2 0.3010 1 1 LSKR01 1995 148 2.1708 32 1.4985 1 LSKR01 1996 173 2.2370 29 1.4581 1 LSKR01 1997 76 1.8799 17 1.2419 1 LSKR01 1998 31 1.4845 19 1.2695 1 LSKR01 1999 44 1.6433 28 1.4538 1 LSKR01 2000 102 2.0086 71 1.8501 LSKR01 2001 129 2.1096 89 1.9516 LSKR01 2002 105 2.0205 103 2.0138 LSKR01 2003 95 1.9765 38 1.5798 LSKR01 2004 9 0.9546 4 0.6344 1 1 LSKS01 1995 70 1.8447 28 1.4418 1 LSKS01 1996 270 2.4321 24 1.3776 1 LSKS01 1997 113 2.0519 39 1.5940 LSKS01 1998 190 2.2794 90 1.9540 LSKS01 1999 46 1.6583 8 0.9109 1 LSKS01 2000 75 1.8734 6 0.7741 1 LSKS01 2001 103 2.0111 8 0.8973 1 LSKS01 2002 34 1.5343 9 0.9412 1 LSKS01 2003 25 1.3914 2 0.3965 1 LSKS01 2004 16 1.2075 7 0.8556 1 LSTU01 1995 8 0.8819 4 0.6004 1 1 LSTU01 1996 26 1.4124 4 0.5836 1 LSTU01 1997 5 0.7171 5 0.6966 1 1 LSTU01 1998 14 1.1312 3 0.5000 1 1 LSTU01 1999 6 0.7676 3 0.4331 1 1 LSTU01 2000 5 0.6790 2 0.3253 1 1 LSTU01 2001 2 0.3891 1 0.0000 1 1 LSTU01 2002 8 0.9150 4 0.5445 1 1 LSTU01 2003 1 0.0000 2 0.1945 1 1 LSTU01 2004 2 0.3333 1 0.0000 1 1 LSVW01 1995 248 2.3953 16 1.2063 1 LSVW01 1996 234 2.3690 10 0.9790 1 LSVW01 1997 544 2.7359 68 1.8349 LSVW01 1998 146 2.1649 24 1.3751 1 LSVW01 1999 62 1.7919 10 1.0068 1 LSVW01 2000 158 2.1994 24 1.3736 1 LSVW01 2001 54 1.7305 10 1.0009 1 LSVW01 2002 296 2.4720 22 1.3456 1 LSVW01 2003 11 1.0599 6 0.7821 1 1 LSVW01 2004 22 1.3329 13 1.1109 1 LTAB01 1995 4 0.6148 3 0.4643 1 1 LTAB01 1996 9 0.9727 2 0.3404 1 1 LTAB01 1997 24 1.3764 7 0.8488 1 LTAB01 1998 10 0.9836 3 0.5084 1 1 LTAB01 1999 5 0.7049 3 0.4445 1 1 LTAB01 2000 4 0.5638 2 0.3451 1 1 LTAB01 2001 7 0.8198 1 0.1003 1 1 LTAB01 2002 2 0.3138 1 0.0000 1 1 LTAB01 2003 5 0.7113 2 0.2258 1 1 LTAB01 2004 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 LTEH02 1995 36 1.5517 6 0.7782 1 LTEH02 1996 30 1.4828 20 1.3081 1 LTEH02 1997 91 1.9606 18 1.2455 1 LTEH02 1998 27 1.4367 5 0.6647 1 LTEH02 1999 10 0.9824 5 0.6628 1 1 LTEH02 2000 11 1.0231 3 0.4989 1 1 LTEH02 2001 22 1.3370 5 0.7347 1 LTEH02 2002 14 1.1406 8 0.9097 1 1 LTEH02 2003 7 0.8451 1 0.0000 1 1 LTEH02 2004 38 1.5779 13 1.1115 1 MSJL01 2002 73 1.8625 62 1.7894 MSJL01 2003 81 1.9076 334 2.5233 MSJL01 2004 18 1.2460 33 1.5181 1 MSSM05 1995 172 2.2345 187 2.2715 MSSM05 1996 84 1.9220 37 1.5673 MSSM05 1997 227 2.3555 26 1.4219 1 MSSM05 1998 188 2.2735 163 2.2118 MSSM05 1999 2856 3.4558 375 2.5735 MSSM05 2000 774 2.8885 193 2.2845 MSSM05 2001 1764 3.2464 613 2.7877 MSSM05 2002 256 2.4086 224 2.3505 MSSM05 2003 55 1.7429 138 2.1385 MSSM05 2004 8 0.8973 17 1.2289 1 1 MTEC01 1995 161 2.2059 53 1.7271 MTEC01 1996 111 2.0437 164 2.2153 MTEC01 1997 144 2.1571 55 1.7402 MTEC01 1998 44 1.6480 113 2.0543 MTEC01 1999 1051 3.0216 380 2.5803 MTEC01 2000 43 1.6344 292 2.4659 MTEC01 2001 40 1.6037 133 2.1243 MTEC01 2002 48 1.6857 25 1.4056 1 MTEC01 2004 4 0.5604 4 0.5720 1 1 MTLD03 1998 170 2.2304 80 1.9031 MTLD03 1999 71 1.8512 79 1.8960 MTLD03 2000 119 2.0740 53 1.7273 MTLD03 2001 42 1.6258 47 1.6709 MTLD03 2002 42 1.6217 20 1.3114 1 MTLD03 2003 12 1.0914 28 1.4426 1 1 MTLD03 2004 6 0.7741 4 0.5775 1 1 JSTU01 1997 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 JSTU01 1998 1 0.1505 1 0.0000 1 1 KSIW02 1997 1 0.1590 1 0.0000 1 1 KSIW02 1998 1 0.1193 1 0.0000 1 1 KSIW02 1999 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 LTED04 1997 3 0.5340 1 0.1003 1 1 LTED04 1998 2 0.3860 1 0.0000 1 1 LTED04 1999 2 0.3138 1 0.1193 1 1 LTED04 2000 3 0.4758 1 0.0753 1 1 LTED04 2001 2 0.3537 2 0.3356 1 1 LTED04 2002 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 LTED04 2003 2 0.2386 1 0.1193 1 1 LTED04 2004 5 0.7112 5 0.6667 1 1 PTWELLS1 1999 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 PTWELLS1 2000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 PTWELLS1 2001 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 PTWELLS1 2002 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 PTWELLS1 2003 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 PTWELLS1 2004 1 0.1590 1 0.0000 1 1 VO50E 2001 1 0.0000 1 0.0602 1 1 VO50E 2002 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 VO50E 2003 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 VO50E 2004 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 KSSK02 1997 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 KSSK02 1998 1 0.0753 1 0.0000 1 1 KSSK02 1999 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 KSSK02 2000 3 0.5103 2 0.3978 1 1 KSSK02 2001 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 KSSK02 2002 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 KSSK02 2003 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 KSSK02 2004 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 LTBC40 1997 3 0.5017 2 0.2594 1 1 LTBC40 1998 3 0.4811 1 0.1193 1 1 LTBC40 1999 3 0.5161 2 0.3138 1 1 LTBC40 2000 2 0.1945 2 0.1945 1 1 LTBC40 2001 26 1.4110 7 0.8368 1 LTBC40 2002 2 0.1945 1 0.0000 1 1 LTBC40 2003 4 0.5459 1 0.1542 1 1 LTBC40 2004 1 0.1505 1 0.0000 1 1 TOTALS 241 124 191 CHECK 241 FC < 14;

EN < 35 FC < 14;

EN > 35 FC > 14;

EN < 35 FC > 14;

EN > 35 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 124 0 67 50 ID Stations # Values # FC < 43 # EN < 104 FC < 43;

EN < 104 FC < 43;

EN > 104 FC > 43;

EN < 104 FC > 43;

EN > 104 % Open; but should close ITCARKEEKP Carkeek Park 17 15 17 15 0 2 0 0%

JSVW04 Richmond Beach 82 41 51 39 2 12 29 5%

JSWX01 Richmond Beach 34 28 28 26 2 2 4 7%

KSHZ03 Carkeek Park 98 37 57 35 2 22 39 5%

KSJX02 Blue Ridge Beach Park 15 13 13 13 0 0 2 0%

KSLU03 Golden Gardens Park 95 44 63 42 2 21 30 5%

KSQU01 Shilshole Bay 40 26 39 26 0 13 1 0%

KSSN04 West Point 70 43 52 43 0 9 18 0%

KSSN05 West Point 50 32 44 32 0 12 6 0%

KSXS02 Magnolia 15 13 15 13 0 2 0 0%

KSYV02 Magnolia 39 29 37 29 0 8 2 0%

LSFX01 Duwamish Head 29 26 28 26 0 2 1 0%

LSGY01 Seacrest Park 28 28 28 28 0 0 0 0%

LSHV01 West Seattle 44 44 44 44 0 0 0 0%

LSKR01 Alki Point 73 27 48 27 0 21 25 0%

LSKS01 Alki Point 47 20 41 20 0 21 6 0%

LSTU01 Lincoln Park 41 38 40 38 0 2 1 0%

LSVW01 Fauntleroy Cove 62 19 52 18 1 34 9 5%

LTAB01 Inner Elliott Bay 37 36 37 36 0 1 0 0%

LTEH02 Inner Elliott Bay 34 26 32 26 0 6 2 0%

MSJL01 Vashon Island  Gorsuch Creek 20 9 11 9 0 2 9 0%

MSSM05 Vashon Island  Tramp Harbor 60 12 32 11 1 21 27 8%

MTEC01 Seahurst Park 42 13 21 11 2 10 19 15%

MTLD03 Normandy Park 48 22 27 19 3 8 18 14%

JSTU01 Richmond Beach 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 0%

KSIW02 Carkeed Park 11 11 11 11 0 0 0 0%

LTED04 Elliott Bay 30 29 30 29 0 1 0 0%

PTWELLS1 Point Wells 31 31 31 31 0 0 0 0%

VO50E Vashon TP Outfall 16 16 16 16 0 0 0 0%

KSSK02 West Point TP Outfall 29 28 29 28 0 1 0 0%

LTBC40 Denny Way CSO Outfall 31 30 31 30 0 1 0 0%

TOTALS 1274 792 1011 777 15 234 248 2%

King County Nearshore Marine Water Bacteria Data January 1995 through August 2004  Summer Only Summer ( June thru Sept) Individual Samples King County, WA Summer Bacteria  1995 to 2004 All Nearshore Stations 0.0000 0.5000 1.0000 1.5000 2.0000 2.5000 3.0000 3.5000 4.0000 4.5000 5.0000 0.0000 0.5000 1.0000 1.5000 2.0000 2.5000 3.0000 3.5000 4.0000 4.5000 5.0000 Fecal Coliform ( log 10)

Enterococci (

log 10) N = 15 N = 248 N = 234 N = 777 Enterococci = 104 Fecal =

43 SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.418144 R Square 0.174845 Adjusted R 0.173951 Standard E 2157.782 Observation 1120 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 1 1.1E+ 09 1.1E+ 09 237.1084 1.15E 48 Residual 1119 5.21E+ 09 4656024 Total 1120 6.31E+ 09 Coefficientstandard Erro t Stat P value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%

Intercept 0 # N/ A # N/ A # N/ A # N/ A # N/ A # N/ A # N/ A Fecal Colifo 0.482056 0.028633 16.83579 7.26E 57 0.425876 0.538237 0.425876 0.538237 RESIDUAL OUTPUT Observationcted Enteroc Residuals 1 2.892339 3.107661 2 23.62077 0.379232 3 1.928226  0.928226 4 0.482056 3.517944 5 1.446169  0.446169 6 0.964113 0.035887 7 1.928226  0.928226 8 1.928226 4.071774 9 20.72843  13.72843 10 1.446169  0.446169 11 0.482056 2.517944 12 0.482056 0.517944 13 0.482056 0.517944 14 11.56936  2.569356 15 0.964113 5.035887 16 2.410282 1.589718 17 19.76432 1.235684 18 9.64113 160.3589 19 0.482056 0.517944 20 53.02621 156.9738 21 6.266734  2.266734 22 1.446169  0.446169 23 24.10282 85.89718 24 1.928226 1.071774 25 1687.198  587.1977 26 0.482056 4.517944 27 1590.786  1390.786 28 3.374395 1.625605 29 7.712904 162.2871 30 110.873  40.87299 31 6.748791  4.748791 32 236.2077 93.79232 33 15.90786  13.90786 34 1.928226  0.928226 35 12.53347 17.46653 36 1253.347  463.3469 Fecal Coliform Line Fit Plot ( Summer Data)


[Federal Register: December 20, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 244)]
[Notices]
[Page 76315-76316]
[DOCID:fr20de06-80]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings  1

December 13, 2006.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC07-34-000.
    Applicants: Dogwood Energy LLC; MEP Pleasant Hill LLC
    Description: Dogwood Energy LLC and MEP Pleasant Hill, LLC submit a
joint application for approval of the transfer of jurisdictional
facilities and existing generating facilities.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061211-0067.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, December 29, 2006.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG07-19-000.
    Applicants: High Prairie Wind Farm II, LLC.
    Description: High Prairie Wind Farm II, LLC submits a notice of
Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status.
    Filed Date: 12/07/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061207-5060.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, December 28, 2006.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER07-188-002; ER99-2774-015; ER03-956-011; ER07-
191-002; ER07-189-002; ER07-190-002; ER00-826-008; ER00-828-008; ER98-
421-019; ER98-4055-016; ER01-1337-011; ER02-177-012; ER03-1212-010;
ER01-1820-010.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Carolina, LLC; Duke Energy Trading and
Marketing, L.L.C.; Duke Energy Marketing America, LLC; Duke Energy
Ohio, Inc.; Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.; Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc.;
Brownsville Power I LLC; Caledonia Power I, L.L.C.; CinCap IV, LLC;
CinCap V, LLC; Cinergy Capital & Trading, Inc.; Cinergy Power
Investments, Inc.; St. Paul Cogeneration, LLC; Cinergy Operating
Companies.
    Description: Duke Energy Corp et al submit a notice of change in
status re their authority to engage in wholesale sales of capacity,
energy and ancillary services at market-based rate.
    Filed Date: 12/11/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061212-0108.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 02, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER02-2330-045.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc..
    Description: ISO New England Inc submits its seventeenth quarterly
status report in compliance with FERC's 9/20/02 Order.
    Filed Date: 12/11/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061212-0114.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 02, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1497-004.
    Applicants: Dearborn Industrial Generation, LLC.
    Description: Dearborn Industrial Generation, LLC submits an Errata
to its Redlined Comparison Tariff in its final compliance filing
pursuant to the Commission's 10/25/06 order.
    Filed Date: 12/11/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061212-0117.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 02, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-1543-001.
    Applicants: Brush Cogeneration Partners.
    Description: Brush Cogeneration Partners submits a compliance
filing to remove Section 1(a) and additional references to ancillary
services in Sections 1 and 2 of its current market-based rate tariff
pursuant to the Commission's 11/30/06 order.
    Filed Date: 12/11/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061212-0109.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 02, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-174-002.
    Applicants: Osceola Windpower, LLC.
    Description: Osceola Windpower, LLC submits an amendment to its
Market-Based Tariff effective 1/2/07.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061212-0101.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, December 29, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-312-000.
    Applicants: Dogwood Energy LLC.
    Description: Dogwood Energy LLC submits an Application for Market-
Based authorization and Related Waivers and Pre-Approvals and also
submits FERC Electric Tariff, Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 12/08/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061212-0106.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, December 29, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-313-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Pacific Gas and Electric submits an executed Letter of
Agreement for RAS Interim Upgrade with the California Department of
Water Resources--State Water Project, First Revised Rate Schedule No.
77.
    Filed Date: 12/11/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061212-0105.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 02, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-314-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits an unexecuted
revised Service Agreement for Network Integration Transmission Service
with American Electric Power Service Corporation, Southwestern Electric
Power Company and Mutual Energy SWEPCO L.P.

    Filed Date: 12/11/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061212-0116.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 02, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-315-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits an executed
Interconnection Service Agreement with Beech Ridge Energy, LLC and
Monongahela Power Company.
    Filed Date: 12/11/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061212-0107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 02, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-316-000.
    Applicants: Avista Corporation.
    Description: Avista Corporation submits revisions to its Open
Access Transmission Tariff pursuant to order 676.
    Filed Date: 12/11/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061212-0113.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 02, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-317-000.
    Applicants: Allegheny Power.
    Description: The Potomac Edison Co dba Allegheny Power submits a
Letter Agreement with Old Dominion Electric Cooperative.
    Filed Date: 12/11/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061212-0110.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 02, 2007.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified Comment
Date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-21705 Filed 12-19-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 212 (Friday, November 1, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58817-58818]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23953]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. 2019-37]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; Daniel
Waghorne

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations. The
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and
participation in, the FAA's exemption process. Neither publication of
this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary
is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final
disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before November 21, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2019-0305
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140,
West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jake Troutman,<PHONE_NUMBER>, Office
of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 28, 2019.
Forest Rawls,
Acting Deputy Executive Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2019-0305.
    Petitioner: Daniel Waghorne.
    Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: Part 21, subpart H Sec. Sec.
61.113(a) & (b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b)(2); 91.103; 91.105; 91.109; 91.119;
91.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a) & (b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1);
91.401(a)(1) & (2); & 91.417(a) & (b).
    Description of Relief Sought: The proposed exemption, if granted,
would allow the petitioner to operate the Watts Innovation MFD-5000
unmanned

aircraft system, with a maximum gross weight of up to 78 pounds,
including payload, to conduct photography and videography within the
United States of America. All operations will be conducted within
visual line of sight and in class G airspace during the day. The
operations will remain below 400 feet above ground level.

[FR Doc. 2019-23953 Filed 10-31-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 92 (Friday, May 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26600-26602]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10234]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[Docket No. PHMSA-2019-0172]

Pipeline Safety; Information Collection Activities

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces that the information collection requests (ICR)
summarized below are being forwarded to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and comments. A Federal Register notice
soliciting comments on the following information collections with a 60-
day comment period was published on December 17, 2020.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 14, 2021.
    Privacy Act Statement: DOT may solicit comments from the public
regarding certain general notices. DOT posts these comments, without
edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/
ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Confidential Business Information: Confidential Business
Information (CBI) is commercial or financial information that is both
customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from
public disclosure. If your comments responsive to this notice contain
commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as
private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this notice, it is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Pursuant to 49 CFR 190.343, you may ask
PHMSA to give confidential treatment to information you give to the
Agency by taking the following steps: (1) Mark each page of the
original document submission containing CBI as ``Confidential''; (2)
send PHMSA, along with the original document, a second copy of the
original document with the CBI deleted; and (3) explain why the
information you are submitting is CBI. Only the redacted copy will be
placed in the public docket. Submissions containing CBI should be sent
to Angela Hill, DOT, PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, PHP-30,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Any commentary PHMSA receives that is not
specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for
this matter.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Hill by telephone at 202/680-
2034 or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995,\1\ before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information. On December 17,
2020, PHMSA published a notice in the Federal Register soliciting
comments on several proposed revisions to Form PHMSA F7100.2-1,
``Annual Report for Natural and Other Gas Transmission and Gathering
Pipeline Systems,'' and Form PHMSA F7100.4-1, ``Underground Natural Gas
Storage Facility Annual Report,'' both under OMB Control No. 2137-
0522.\2\ PHMSA also proposed changes to Form PHMSA F7100.2, ``Incident
Report--Gas Transmission and Gathering Systems,'' under OMB Control No.
2137-0635.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
    \2\ 85 FR 82028.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    During the 60-day comment period, PHMSA received comments from the
National Association of Pipeline Safety Representatives (NAPSR) and a
joint comment from the American Gas Association, the American Petroleum
Institute, the American Public Gas Association, and the Interstate
Natural Gas Association of America (collectively, the Associations).
    The comments received are organized by topic area, summarized, and
addressed below.

A. Form PHMSA F7100.2-1 Annual Report for Natural and Other Gas
Transmission and Gathering Pipeline Systems

    The Associations suggested that PHMSA modify the instructions for
Part G to clarify that operators are only required to report baseline
and reassessment data for moderate consequence area (MCA) segments
subject to 49 CFR 192.710. The Associations recommended that Sec.
192.710 be added to the form after ``MCA'' on Part G, sections d-h.
    PHMSA appreciates the Associations making the important distinction
between MCA segments and segments required to be assessed under Sec.
192.710. PHMSA has implemented the Associations' suggestion by
replacing ``MCA'' with ``Sec.  192.710'' in Part G, sections d-h, to
provide clarity. Further, PHMSA's proposed changes did not recognize
this important distinction in Parts F and L of the form. Accordingly,
PHMSA has changed ``MCA'' to ``Sec.  192.710'' throughout Parts F and
L.
    The Associations commented that PHMSA should further clarify which
relief valve and emergency shutdown (ESD) events must be reported under
Part G1 of the annual form. Per the Associations, the instructions
should clarify that leaks are not reportable in Part G1 since they are
already included in Part M. The Associations commented that relief
valve ``chatter,'' which can generally be rectified by adjustment of
the relief device, is not reportable under Part G1. They suggested
reporting only ``confirmed'' activations/events and stated that the
proposed reporting changes do not require operators to implement new
procedures to identify relief valve activations. The Associations
suggested that the proposed changes should simply require operators to
report the number of relief valve activations and ESD events that are
observed (and currently recorded as abnormal operating conditions) by
operator personnel. The Associations also recommended that PHMSA should
not begin requiring the reporting of any intentional release data under
Part G1

until the 2022 calendar year annual reports (due in March 2023) since
operators need time to modify processes to collect and report relief
valve activations and ESD events in the form PHMSA proposes to collect
it.
    PHMSA is not implementing the changes suggested by the Associations
regarding the reporting of relief valve and ESD events. PHMSA is
withdrawing its proposal to move reporting of these events from the
incident form (Form PHMSA F7100.2) to the annual form (Form PHMSA
F7100.2-1) at this time because PHMSA's initial proposal inadvertently
omitted notice to the public that the annual form would include an
additional requirement that operators report the volume of natural gas
released during these events. As currently noticed, PHMSA would not be
able to collect the amount of gas released from relief valve and ESD
events after making the change from the incident to the annual reports.
The volume of gas released is important data that PHMSA currently
collects via the incident reports so no changes will be made at this
time to avoid any disruption in the data collected. PHMSA intends to
address this issue in a future information collection amendment and
will consider all of the comments provided at that time.
    NAPSR requested that a section for reporting excavation damages be
added to the Annual Report for Natural and Other Gas Transmission and
Gathering Pipeline Systems. NAPSR commented that, for consistency, the
added section should reflect the ``causes'' from the existing Section D
of the Gas Distribution Annual Report (Form PHMSA F7100.1-1). The
addition would include excavation damage, root cause, and the total
number of one-call ticket requests by state. NAPSR stated this addition
will provide for accurate and consistent statistical data across all
pipeline types.
    PHMSA did not propose the change requested by NAPSR in the 60-day
notice, so it cannot be added to this information collection proposal.
PHMSA intends to address this issue in a future information collection
change.

B. Form PHMSA F7100.2 Incident Report--Gas Transmission and Gathering
Systems

    The Associations recommended additional changes to ensure a clear
distinction between ``intentional'' and ``unintentional'' releases
through relief valves and ESDs.
    PHMSA is not implementing the changes suggested by the Associations
regarding the reporting of relief valve and ESD events. As explained
above, PHMSA is withdrawing its proposal to move reporting of relief
valve activation and ESD events from the incident report (Form PHMSA F
7100.2) to the annual report (Form PHMSA F 7100.2-1) at this time
because PHMSA's initial proposal inadvertently omitted notice that
operators would be required to report the volume of natural gas
released during these events on the annual report. PHMSA intends to
address this issue in a future information collection change and will
consider these comments at that time.

C. Form PHMSA F7100.4-1 Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility Annual
Report

    The Associations recommended adding an additional category of wells
as Part C10c in the report. The Associations stated that by adding
``number of wells plugged and abandoned during the calendar year'' as
an additional category in C10, there would be no duplication among
counts in C10. PHMSA agrees and has added C10c.
    The Associations recommended that PHMSA clarify what is meant by
``wells plugged but not abandoned'' and stated they believe this
category is not intended to include temporary plugs.
    PHMSA agrees and has modified the instructions for the report by
explicitly excluding ``temporary bridge plugs.''

II. Summary of Impacted Collection

    Section 1320.8(d), Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, requires
PHMSA to provide interested members of the public and affected agencies
an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping
requests. This notice identifies an information collection request that
PHMSA will submit to OMB for revision.
    The following information is provided for this information
collection: (1) Title of the information collection; (2) OMB control
number; (3) current expiration date; (4) type of request; (5) abstract
of the information collection activity; (6) description of affected
public; (7) estimate of total annual reporting and recordkeeping
burden; and (8) frequency of collection.
    PHMSA will request a 3-year term of approval for this information
collection activity. PHMSA requests comments on the following
information:
    1. Title: Annual and Incident Reports for Gas Pipeline Operators.
    OMB Control Number: 2137-0522.
    Current Expiration Date: 1/31/2023.
    Type of Request: Revision.
    Abstract: This mandatory information collection covers the
collection of data from operators of natural gas pipelines, underground
natural gas storage facilities, and liquefied natural gas (LNG)
facilities for annual reports. 49 CFR 191.17 requires operators of
underground natural gas storage facilities, gas transmission systems,
and gas gathering systems to submit an annual report by March 15, for
the preceding calendar year. The revision to this information
collection includes changes to the form and instructions for PHMSA
F7100.4-1, ``Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility Annual Report,''
and revisions to the form and instructions for PHMSA F7100.2-1,
``Annual Report for Natural and Other Gas Transmission and Gathering
Pipeline Systems.'' The revisions to the ``Underground Natural Gas
Storage Facility Annual Report'' Form provide clarity on submitting
data and include no new data elements. The revisions to the ``Annual
Report for Natural and Other Gas Transmission and Gathering Pipeline
Systems'' Form include collecting the number of miles in high
consequence areas in accordance with 49 CFR 192.903 and the type of
risk model used; and to reorganize some data fields to streamline the
reporting of certain data elements.
    Affected Public: Operators of Natural Gas Pipelines, Underground
Natural Gas Storage Facilities, and LNG Facilities.
    Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:
    Annual Responses: 10,547.
    Annual Burden Hours: 80,101.
    Frequency of collection: Annually and on occasion.
    2. Title: Incident Reporting for Natural Gas Pipeline Operators and
LNG Facilities.
    OMB Control Number: 2137-0635.
    Current Expiration Date: 1/31/2023.
    Type of Request: Revision.
    Abstract: Operators of natural gas pipelines and LNG facilities are
required to report incidents, on occasion, to PHMSA per the
requirements in 49 CFR part 191. PHMSA proposes to revise the form and
instructions for the Incident Report--Natural and Other Gas
Transmission and Gathering Pipeline System (PHMSA F7100.2) to include
details on when operators are to answer questions E6 through E8 of the
incident report.
    Affected Public: Natural Gas Pipeline Operators and Operators of
LNG Facilities.
    Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:
    Estimated number of responses: 301.
    Estimated annual burden hours: 3,612.
    Frequency of collection: On occasion.
    Comments are invited on:
    (a) The need for the renewal and revision of these collections of

information for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    (b) The accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
    (c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
    (d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques.

    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1.48.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 11, 2021, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.
John A. Gale,
Director, Standards and Rulemaking Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-10234 Filed 5-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15010-15011]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6318]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 206(4)-6; SEC File No. 270-513; OMB Control No. 3235-0571.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
(``OMB'') a request for extension of the previously approved collection
of information discussed below.
    The title for the collection of information is ``Rule 206(4)-6''
under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-1 et seq.)
(``Advisers Act'') and the collection has been approved under OMB
Control No. 3235-0571. The Commission adopted rule 206(4)-6 (17 CFR
275.206(4)-6), the proxy voting rule, to address an investment
adviser's fiduciary obligation to clients who have given the adviser
authority to vote their securities. Under the rule, an investment
adviser that exercises voting authority over client securities is
required to: (i) Adopt and implement policies and procedures that are
reasonably designed to ensure that the adviser votes securities in the
best interest of clients, including procedures to address any material
conflict that may arise between the interest of the adviser and the
client; (ii) disclose to clients how they may obtain information on how
the adviser has voted with respect to their securities; and (iii)
describe to clients the adviser's proxy voting policies and procedures
and, on request, furnish a copy of the policies and procedures to the
requesting client. The rule is designed to assure that advisers that
vote proxies for their clients vote those proxies in their clients'
best interest and provide clients with information about how their
proxies were voted.
    Rule 206(4)-6 contains ``collection of information'' requirements
within the meaning of the Paperwork Reduction Act. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control
number. The collection is mandatory and responses to the disclosure
requirement are not kept confidential.
    The respondents are investment advisers registered with the
Commission that vote proxies with respect to clients' securities.
Advisory clients of these investment advisers use the information
required by the rule to assess investment advisers' proxy voting
policies and procedures and to monitor the advisers' performance of
their proxy voting activities. The information required by Rule 206(4)-
6 also is used by the Commission staff in its examination and oversight
program. Without the information collected under the rule, advisory
clients would not have information they need to assess the adviser's
services and monitor the adviser's handling of their accounts, and the
Commission would be less efficient and effective in its programs.
    The estimated number of investment advisers subject to the
collection of information requirements under the rule is 10,207. It is
estimated that each of these advisers is required to spend on average
10 hours annually documenting its proxy voting procedures under the
requirements of the rule, for a total burden of 102,070 hours. We
further estimate that on average, approximately 121 clients of each
adviser would request copies of the underlying policies and procedures.
We estimate that it would take these advisers 0.1 hours per client to
deliver copies of the policies and procedures, for a total burden of
123,505 hours. Accordingly, we estimate that rule 206(4)-6 results in
an annual aggregate burden of collection for SEC-registered investment
advisers of a total of 225,575 hours.
    Records related to an adviser's proxy voting policies and
procedures and proxy voting history are separately

required under the Advisers Act recordkeeping rule 204-2 (17 CFR
275.204-2). The standard retention period required for books and
records under rule 204-2 is five years, in an easily accessible place,
the first two years in an appropriate office of the investment adviser.
OMB has previously approved the collection with this retention period.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following Web site, http://www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for
the Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New
Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503, or by sending an e-
mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Thomas Bayer, Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an
e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB
within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: March 14, 2011.
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-6318 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: October 2, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 192)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 57246-57248]
[DOCID:fr02oc08-9]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2007-1100; FRL-8723-9]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Ohio; Removal of Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Programs for
Cincinnati and Dayton

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Ohio which allows the State to discontinue
the vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program in the Cincinnati-
Hamilton and Dayton-Springfield areas, also known as the E-Check
program. The revision specifically requests that the E-Check program
regulations be moved from the active control measures portion of the
SIP to the contingency measures portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton and
Dayton-Springfield ozone maintenance plans. The Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) submitted this request on April 4, 2005,
and supplemented it on May 20, 2005, February 14, 2006, May 9, 2006,
October 6, 2006, and February 19, 2008. EPA is approving Ohio's request
because the State has demonstrated that discontinuing the I/M program
in the Cincinnati-Hamilton and Dayton-Springfield areas will not
interfere with the attainment and maintenance of the 8-hour ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and the fine particulate
NAAQS or with the attainment and maintenance of other air quality
standards.

DATES: This final rule is effective on November 3, 2008.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2007-1100. All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be
publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air
and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604. This Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. We recommend that you
telephone Francisco J. Acevedo at<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting the
Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Francisco J. Acevedo, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. What is the background for this action?
II. What is our response to comments received on the notice of
proposed rulemaking?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What is the background for this action?

    The Cincinnati-Hamilton and Dayton-Springfield areas were required
to implement ``basic'' I/M programs under section 182(b)(4) of the
Clean Air Act (CAA) because they were originally designated as moderate
1-hour ozone nonattainment areas. In order to maximize nitrogen oxides
(NOX), volatile organic compound (VOC), and carbon monoxide
(CO) emissions reductions from the I/M program, Ohio EPA chose to
implement an ``enhanced'' program in those areas and incorporated an
on-board diagnostic (OBD) component into the programs. EPA fully
approved Ohio's I/M programs on April 4, 1995 (60 FR 16989). The E-
Check programs began operation on January 2, 1996, to meet
nonattainment area requirements for the ozone NAAQS effective at the
time.\1\ The Cincinnati ozone nonattainment area also includes three
counties (Boone, Campbell, and Kenton Counties) in northern Kentucky.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Although the E-Check program began on January 1, 1996, there
was a vehicle I/M program operating in the Cincinnati-Hamilton area
prior to that date, and prior to November 15, 1990.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Both the Cincinnati-Hamilton area and the Dayton-Springfield area
have since been redesignated to attainment with respect to the 1-hour
ozone NAAQS. The Cincinnati-Hamilton area was redesignated to
attainment of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS on June 21, 2005 (70 FR 35946).
The Dayton-Springfield area was redesignated to attainment of the 1-
hour ozone NAAQS on May 5, 1995 (60 FR 22289). On August 13, 2007 (72
FR 45169), EPA approved the redesignation of the Dayton-Springfield
area to attainment with respect to the 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
    EPA approved maintenance plans for each of these areas in
connection with these redesignations. These approved maintenance plans
show that control measures in place in these areas are sufficient for
overall emissions to remain beneath the attainment level of emissions
until the end of the maintenance period. In both cases, the conformity
budget in the maintenance plans reflects mobile source emissions
without E-Check, and the maintenance plans demonstrate that the
applicable standard will continue to be met without E-Check. In
accordance with the CAA and EPA redesignation guidance, states are free
to adjust control strategies in the maintenance plan as long as they
can satisfy section 110(l). With such a demonstration of non-
interference with attainment or other applicable requirements, control
programs may be discontinued and removed from the SIP.
    Ohio EPA submitted a revision to the Cincinnati-Hamilton and
Dayton-Springfield portions of the Ohio SIP on April 4, 2005, and
supplemented it on May 20, 2005, February 14, 2006, May 9, 2006,
October 6, 2006, and February 19, 2008. This revision requested that
the Ohio I/M programs in the Cincinnati-Hamilton and Dayton-Springfield
areas be moved from the active control measures portion of the ozone
SIP to the contingency measures portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton and
Dayton-Springfield Maintenance Plans.
    As part of its submittal, Ohio EPA demonstrated continued
maintenance of the 1-hour ozone standard without taking credit for
reductions from the Cincinnati-Hamilton E-Check program,

and continued maintenance of the 1-hour and 8-hour ozone standards
without taking credit for reductions from the Dayton-Springfield E-
Check program.
    In addition, Ohio adopted several measures to assure that the
discontinuation of E-Check, which occurred starting January 1, 2006,
does not interfere with timely attainment of the ozone air quality
standard. All the replacement measures are currently in effect and
establish obligatory requirements applicable to affected groups.
    The various measures adopted by Ohio to reduce VOC emissions
include a rule requiring use of lower emitting solvents in cold cleaner
degreasers, a rule requiring the use of more efficient paint
application techniques for auto refinishing, and a rule requiring that
portable fuel containers be designed for less volatilization and fuel
spillage. EPA approved these rules on March 30, 2007 (72 FR 15045).
    Ohio also adopted a rule requiring use of low volatility gasoline
in the Cincinnati-Hamilton and Dayton-Springfield areas. EPA approved
Ohio's low vapor pressure gasoline rule on May 25, 2007 (72 FR 29269).
Because of a delay in the implementation of Ohio's low vapor pressure
gasoline program in 2006, Ohio adopted a further rule to provide the
necessary reductions in 2006 and help compensate for the
discontinuation of Ohio's E-Check program. This rule retired 240
allowances from the new source set aside for the ``NOX SIP
Call'' trading program and EPA approved this rule on February 13, 2008
(73 FR 8197).
    EPA concludes that the combination of discontinuing E-Check and use
of low volatility gasoline and the other control measures Ohio adopted
will result in total emissions levels which will not interfere with
attainment of the ozone standard. In addition, EPA believes that
discontinuation of E-Check will clearly not interfere with the fine
particulate NAAQS or with the attainment and maintenance of other air
quality standards.

II. What is our response to comments received on the notice of proposed
rulemaking?

    The notice proposing to approve Ohio's request to discontinue
operation of the I/M programs in the Cincinnati-Hamilton and Dayton-
Springfield areas was published in the Federal Register on July 24,
2008, and the public comment period for this notice closed on August
25, 2008. EPA received comments from two parties on the proposal. The
first set of comments were sent by the Regional Air Pollution Control
Agency of Dayton, Ohio fully supporting the proposal, and the second
set of comments were from representatives of the Environmental
Committee of the Ohio Utility Institute representing Buckeye Power,
Inc., Columbus Southern Power Company, Dayton Power & Light Company,
Duke Energy Ohio, Ohio Power Company, and Ohio Valley Electric
Corporation. The utility comments do not contain objections to EPA's
proposed approval of the shutdown request per se, but instead object to
the statement that the retirement of 240 allowances from the utility
oxides of nitrogen trading program helped in temporarily compensating
for emission increases resulting from I/M discontinuation. The
utilities reiterated objections raised during the approval process of
an earlier EPA action approving the retirement of the 240 allowances, a
notice that was approved by EPA on February 13, 2008 (73 FR 8197), and
has been formally challenged by the utilities. Because EPA addressed
these comments in this earlier rulemaking and the issues relating to
the merits of the allowance rulemaking are currently being addressed
through a separate petition for review process, and the utilities are
not directly objecting to the merits of the I/M program shutdown, EPA
is not elaborating further on its response to these comments.

III. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is approving Ohio's demonstration that eliminating the I/M
programs in the Cincinnati-Hamilton and Dayton-Springfield areas will
not interfere with the attainment and maintenance of the ozone NAAQS
and the fine particulate NAAQS and with the attainment and maintenance
of other air quality standards and requirements of the CAA. We are
further approving Ohio's request to modify the SIP such that I/M is no
longer an active program in these areas and is instead a contingency
measure in these areas' maintenance plans.
    As noted in the proposed notice, the Cincinnati area is currently
designated nonattainment for ozone but is not classified. Pursuant to a
decision of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
in the case of South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. v. EPA (472
F.3d 882 (D.C. Cir. 2006)), EPA will be reevaluating the classification
of ozone nonattainment areas that were formerly classified as ``basic''
for the .08 parts per million (ppm) standard. One possible outcome
could be the reestablishment of a requirement for I/M for the
Cincinnati area.\2\ However, for the reasons stated in the proposed
notice, EPA believes that Ohio has satisfied currently applicable
criteria for discontinuing I/M in the Cincinnati and Dayton areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Because the Dayton area is designated attainment for the
0.08 ppm 8-hour ozone standard, EPA's future classification rule for
that standard would not apply to that area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by December 1, 2008. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: September 24, 2008.
Walter W. Kovalick Jr,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart KK--Ohio

0
2. Section 52.1885 is amended by adding paragraph (gg) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.1885  Control strategy: Ozone.

* * * * *
    (gg) Approval--EPA is approving requests submitted by the State of
Ohio on April 4, 2005, and supplemented on May 20, 2005, February 14,
2006, May 9, 2006, October 6, 2006, and February 19, 2008, to
discontinue the vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program in the
Cincinnati-Hamilton and Dayton-Springfield areas. The submittal also
includes Ohio's demonstration that eliminating the I/M programs in the
Cincinnati-Hamilton and Dayton-Springfield areas will not interfere
with the attainment and maintenance of the ozone NAAQS and the fine
particulate NAAQS and with the attainment and maintenance of other air
quality standards and requirements of the CAA. We are further approving
Ohio's request to modify the SIP such that I/M is no longer an active
program in these areas and is instead a contingency measure in these
areas' maintenance plans.

[FR Doc. E8-23245 Filed 10-1-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P