[Federal Register: October 19, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 202)]
[Notices]
[Page 61742-61743]
[DOCID:fr19oc06-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP06-468-000]

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under
Blanket Authorization

October 13, 2006.
    Take notice that on September 28, 2006, Columbia Gas Transmission
Corporation (Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue, SE., Charleston, West
Virginia 25314, filed in Docket No. CP06-468-000, a prior notice
request pursuant to sections 157.205, 157.208(b) and 157.216(b) of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations under the Natural
Gas Act, and Columbia's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-
76-000 to replace 5.87 miles of its 14-inch Line 1278 with like-size
pipeline, located in Northampton, Lehigh and Bucks Counties,
Pennsylvania. Columbia states that the replacement project is due to
age and condition of the existing pipeline and it estimates the project
cost at approximately $12,475,000, all as more fully set forth in the
application, which is on file with the Commission and open to public
inspection. The filing may also be viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov
 using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number

excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,

(202) 502-8659.
    Any questions regarding the application should be directed to
Fredric J. George, Lead Counsel, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation,
P.O. Box 1273, Charleston, West Virginia 22030-0146 at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days after the
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and, pursuant to section 157.205 of
the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) (18 CFR
157.205) a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the
time allowed therefore, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be
authorized effective the day after the time allowed for protest. If a
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as
an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the NGA.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests, and interventions via the internet in lieu of paper. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site (http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-17470 Filed 10-18-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 3, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 42)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11346-11347]
[DOCID:fr03mr08-7]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-29249; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-112-AD;
Amendment 39-15294; AD 2007-25-12]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321
Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a typographical error in an existing
airworthiness directive (AD) that was published in the Federal Register
on December 10, 2007 (72 FR 69593). The error resulted in a potential
for confusion regarding the applicability of the AD. This AD applies to
certain Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. This
AD requires inspections of the landing gear (LG) selector valve 40GA
and the LG door selector valve 41GA, to identify a possible hydraulic
leak. The corrective action includes replacing the LG selector valve
40GA and/or the LG door selector valve 41GA if necessary.

DATES: Effective January 14, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2141; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 21, 2007, the FAA issued AD
2007-25-12, amendment 39-15294 (72 FR 69593, December 10, 2007), for
certain Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. The
AD requires inspections of the landing gear (LG) selector valve 40GA
and the LG door selector valve 41GA, to identify a possible hydraulic
leak. The corrective action includes replacing the LG selector valve
40GA and/or the LG door selector valve 41GA if necessary.
    As published, the AD applies to airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1) ``and'' (c)(2) of this AD instead of those identified in
paragraph (c)(1) ``or'' (c)(2) of this AD.
    This change is relieving in nature, and no other part of the
regulatory information has been changed; therefore, the final rule is
not republished in the Federal Register.
    The effective date of this AD remains January 14, 2008.

Sec.  39.13   [Corrected]

0
In the Federal Register of December 10, 2007, on page 69594, in the
second column, paragraph (c) of AD 2007-25-12 is corrected to read as
follows:
* * * * *
    (c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321
series airplanes, certificated in any category,

except those identified in paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this AD.
* * * * *

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 25, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-3930 Filed 2-29-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 130 (Tuesday, July 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38666-38668]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15783]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

 [Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0079]

Evaluation of FMVSS No. 301, ``Fuel System Integrity,'' as
Upgraded in 2005 to 2009

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Request for comments on technical report.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces NHTSA's publication of a technical
report evaluating the upgraded FMVSS No. 301. The report's title is:
Evaluation of FMVSS No. 301, ``Fuel System Integrity,'' as Upgraded in
2005 to 2009.

DATES: Comments must be received no later than November 5, 2014.

ADDRESSES:
    Report: The technical report is available on the Internet for
viewing in PDF format at http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/812038.pdf.
You may obtain a copy of the report free of charge by sending a self-
addressed mailing label to Jia-Ern Pai (NVS-431), National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, Room W53-440, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590.
    Comments: You may submit comments [identified by Docket Number
NHTSA-2014-0079] by any of the following methods:
     Internet: To submit comments electronically, go to the
U.S. Government regulations Web site at http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: Written comments may be faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: If you plan to submit written comments by
hand or courier, please do so at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays.
     You may call Docket Management at 1-800-647-5527.
    Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information see the Comments heading of the Supplementary
Information section of this document. Note that all comments received
will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia-Ern Pai, Mathematical
Statistician, Evaluation Division, NVS-431, National Center for
Statistics and Analysis, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, Room W53-440, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NHTSA issued a final rule to upgrade FMVSS
No. 301, Fuel System Integrity, on December 1, 2003, to amend the prior
standards in rear and side impacts. By increasing the impact speeds and
using a moving deformable barrier, the amended test conditions are more
comparable with real-world crashes than the prior standards. The rear
impact upgrade phased in during model years 2007 to 2009, whereas the
new side impact test went into effect in model year 2005.
    The analysis of the rear impact upgrade shows a statistically
significant reduction in post-crash fires ranging from 50 to 60
percent. In addition, the rear impact upgrade would reduce 35 percent
of the fatalities caused by rear impact fires. NHTSA believes that the
rear impact upgrade will save an estimated 23 lives per year, if all
vehicles meet the rear impact upgrade. However, the data do not
currently show that the side impact upgrade resulted in a statistically
significant reduction in side impact fires.
    The statistical analysis does not show any significant affiliated
effect of the rear impact upgrade on frontal impact fires and first-
event-rollover fires. The statistical inference of the rear impact
upgrade should not apply to other crash modes.

Comments

How can I influence NHTSA's thinking on this subject?

    NHTSA welcomes public review of the technical report. NHTSA will
submit to the Docket a response to the comments and, if appropriate,
will supplement or revise the report.

How do I prepare and submit comments?

    Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the Docket, please include the Docket
number of this document (NHTSA-2014-0079) in your comments.
    Your primary comments must not be more than 15 pages long (49 CFR
553.21). However, you may attach additional documents to your primary
comments. There is no limit on the length of the attachments.
    Please submit one copy of your comments, including the attachments,
to Docket Management at the address given above under ADDRESSES.
    Please note that pursuant to the Data Quality Act, in order for
substantive data to be relied upon and used by the agency, it must meet
the information quality standards set forth in the OMB and DOT Data
Quality Act guidelines. Accordingly, we encourage you to consult the
guidelines in preparing your comments. OMB's guidelines may be accessed
at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg_reproducible. DOT's guidelines
may be accessed at http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/subject_areas/statistical_policy_and_research/data_quality_guidelines/index.html.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit http://www.regulations.gov.

How can I be sure that my comments were received?

    If you wish Docket Management to notify you upon its receipt of
your comments, enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the
envelope containing your comments. Upon receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by mail. You may also periodically
access http://www.regulations.gov and enter the number for this docket
(NHTSA-2014-0079) to see if your comments are on line.

How do I submit confidential business information?

    If you wish to submit any information under a claim of
confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete
submission, including the information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. In
addition, you should submit a copy, from which you have deleted the
claimed confidential business information, to Docket Management at the
address given above under ADDRESSES. When you send a comment containing
information claimed to be confidential business information, you should
include a cover letter setting forth the information specified in our
confidential business information regulation. (49 CFR Part 512.)

Will the agency consider late comments?

    In our response, we will consider all comments that Docket
Management receives before the close of business on the comment closing
date indicated above under DATES. To the extent possible, we will also
consider comments that Docket Management receives after that date.

How can I read the comments submitted by other people?

    You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the
address given above under ADDRESSES. The hours of the Docket are
indicated above in the same location.
    You may also see the comments on the Internet. To read the comments
on the Internet, take the following steps:
    (1) Go to the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) FDMS provides two basic methods of searching to retrieve
dockets and docket materials that are available in the system: (a)
``Quick Search'' to search using a full-text search engine, or (b)
``Advanced Search,'' which displays various indexed fields such as the
docket name, docket identification number, phase of the action,
initiating office, date of issuance, document title, document
identification number, type of document, Federal Register reference,
CFR citation, etc. Each data field in the advanced search may be
searched independently or in combination with other fields, as desired.
Each search yields a simultaneous display of all available information
found in FDMS that is relevant to the requested subject or topic.
    (3) You may download the comments. However, since the comments are
imaged documents, instead of word processing documents, the ``pdf''

versions of the documents are word searchable.
    Please note that even after the comment closing date, we will
continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it becomes
available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly,
we recommend that you periodically check the Docket for new material.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 30111, 30181-83 delegation of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.

Terry Shelton,
Associate Administrator for the National Center for Statistics and
Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2014-15783 Filed 7-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 130 (Monday, July 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 36589]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14734]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No.: 34-92332]

Public Availability of the Securities and Exchange Commission's
FY2018 Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), SEC is publishing this
notice to advise the public of the availability of the FY2018 Service
Contract Inventory (SCI) along with the FY2018 SCI Analysis.
    The SCI provides information on FY2018 actions above the simplified
acquisition threshold for service contracts. The inventory organizes
the information by function to show how SEC distributes contracted
resources throughout the agency. SEC developed the inventory per the
guidance issued on January 17, 2017, by the Office of Management and
Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance
is available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/memoranda/2017/service_contract_inventories.pdf.
    The Service Contract Inventory Analysis for FY2018 provides
information based on the FY2018 Inventory. Please note that the SEC's
FY2018 Service Contract Inventory data is now included in government-
wide inventory available on www.acquisition.gov. The government-wide
inventory can be filtered to display the inventory data for the SEC.
The SEC has posted its FY2019 plans for analyzing data, a link to the
FY2018 government-wide Service Contract Inventory, the FY2018 SCI
Analysis on the SEC's homepage at http://www.sec.gov/about/secreports.shtml and http://www.sec.gov/open.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding the service
contract inventory to Vance Cathell, Director Office of Acquisitions
202.551.8385 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: July 7, 2021.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-14734 Filed 7-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24146-24147]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9733]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2012-0311]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Columbia River, Vancouver, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF)
Railway Bridge across the Columbia River, mile 105.6, at Vancouver, WA.
This deviation is necessary to accommodate maintenance of the train
signaling system scheduled for April 30, 2012. This deviation allows
the bridge to remain in the closed position for the duration of the
maintenance activity.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 8 a.m. on April 30, 2012
through 8 p.m. April 30, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2012-

0311 and are available online by going to http://www.regulations.gov,
inserting USCG-2012-0311 in the ``Keyword'' box and then clicking
``Search''. They are also available for inspection or copying at the
Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email the Bridge Administrator, Coast Guard Thirteenth
District; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: BNSF has requested that the BNSF Swing
Bridge across the Columbia River remain closed to vessel traffic to
facilitate maintenance of the train signaling system. BNSF will be
``cutting over'' the train signaling system to a new system on April
30, 2012. During this cut-over the swing span of the BNSF Railway
Bridge across the Columbia River will be disabled and the bridge will
not be able to be opened. The BNSF Bridge crosses the Columbia River,
mile 105.6, and in accordance to NOAA Chart 18526 provides 39 feet of
vertical clearance above Columbia River Datum 0.0 while in the closed
position. Vessels which do not require a bridge opening may continue to
transit beneath the bridge during this closure period. Under normal
operation the bridge opens on signal as required by 33 CFR 117.5. This
deviation period is from 8 a.m. on April 30, 2012 through 8 p.m. April
30, 2012. The deviation allows the swing span of the BNSF Railway
Bridge across the Columbia River, mile 105.6, to remain in the closed
position and need not open for maritime traffic from 8 a.m. through 8
p.m. on April 30, 2012. The swing span will be required to open, if
needed, for vessels engaged in emergency response operations during
this closure period. The bridge shall operate in accordance to 33 CFR
117.5 at all other times. Waterway usage on this stretch of the
Columbia River includes vessels ranging from commercial tug and tow
vessels to recreational pleasure craft including cabin cruisers and
sailing vessels. Mariners will be notified and kept informed of the
bridge's operational status via the Coast Guard Notice to Mariners
publication and Broadcast Notice to Mariners as appropriate.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the designated
time period. This deviation from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: April 9, 2012.
Randall D. Overton,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-9733 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


From:
Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Friday, August 5, 2022 2:32 PM
To:
David Ailor<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:
Mcginn, Kevin<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Shappley, Ned<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Carpenter, Jacob<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>French, Chuck<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Coke ICR2<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
some clarifications and questions RE: COETF Letter Detailing Concerns Regarding EPA's June 28, 2022 Coke Ovens Section 114 Information Collection Requests (ICRs)

Hello David  -  Thank you for sending me your comments on the upcoming Coke RTR 114 information requests. I am including all my notes and comments here for the COETF members as well separately in response to the individual facility emails I received.

A few items to note:
-- Note, I sent a fugitive test data answer file with the emails to Cleveland Cliffs and U.S. Steel. Please confirm receipt or I can resend those emails. From the comments made by Trinity, I surmised there is some confusion about how to submit these data.
-- Note, we are not requiring testing of the flare flame zone nor requiring testing if no test ports are already installed at the flares. We would want COG analyses that represent COG upstream of the flares, if available.
--Note, the 85-day deadline is to tell us when the stack tests are happening and is not the deadline for the test results.
--Note, we can find no reference in the 114 for the stack tests to be performed concurrent with the fugitive sampling. If it is there, this is an error because we don't need these tests to be concurrent.

A few questions based on the emails and documents:
-- US Steel: What previous tests/methods/sources to submit, how old?
-- DTE/EES: For "existing" clean/processed COG analyses offered in lieu of flare testing (by EES), what does "existing" mean? Where is the clean/processed COG sample taken in terms of the batteries and CBRP? Where in the sample train is the COG sampled? Would these samples be considered representative of what is sent to flares?

--COETF: What "EPA ambient data at fenceline" is available? What is the location (facility name, location of test monitors), dates of sampling, which EPA office/contact name performed or requested ambient testing?
--COETF: What specific batteries (by name/number) have anticipated problems with testing bench&yard with method 303 for CCliffs Burns Harbor and US Steel only.
--COETF: Which states and what are the permit requirements for power installation (prior to installation of generators, including small, temporary units) at the three COETF facilities required in the coke 114 to perform fenceline monitoring (CCliffs Burns Harbor, DTE/EES, US Steel)
--COETF: How often are emergency flares used (what is the range in current COETF facilities), i.e., daily/weekly/monthly/ every 3,6,9 months/annually?

Looking forward to talking with everyone next week.

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

Pronouns - She/Her/Hers
Salutation - Dr./Ms.

From: David Ailor<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 2:53 PM
To: French, Chuck<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: COETF Letter Detailing Concerns Regarding EPA's June 28, 2022 Coke Ovens Section 114 Information Collection Requests (ICRs)

Dear Mr. French and Dr. Jones:

On June 29, 2022, the four member companies of the Coke Oven Environmental Task Force (COETF) received Clean Air Act Section 114 Information Collection Requests (ICRs) from EPA.  The ICRs relate to the ongoing Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (PQBS) 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart CCCCC Risk and Technology Review (RTR) and the technology review for Coke Batteries under 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart L, but also include testing, interior and fenceline monitoring, and other information collection activities related to potential new regulations for coke byproduct recovery plants (CBRP).

The COETF engaged Trinity Consultants (Trinity) to assist us in assessing concerns with the ICRs.  Trinity has identified a number of safety, technical and schedule concerns insofar as the proposed ICR testing requirements and other information collection activities.  Attached to this e-mail is an August 2, 2022, letter from me to you setting forth the concerns of the COETF on the ICRs, reflecting the concerns identified to us by Trinity (see "August 2 2022 COETF Letter Detailing ICR Concerns.pdf"),.  In view of these concerns, the COETF requests that EPA make a number of changes to the ICRs.

In the coming days, I will contact you to schedule a date/time when we can meet to discuss these concerns with you.  In the meantime, please contact me if you have any questions.  David Ailor

David C. Ailor, P.E.
President
American Coke and Coal Chemicals Institute
25 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20001
Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>
eFax.:<PHONE_NUMBER>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>www.accci.org


[Federal Register: October 26, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 207)]
[Notices]
[Page 66347-66348]
[DOCID:fr26oc11-107]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities; Requests for Comments:
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection; Hazardous
Materials Training Requirements

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the following collection of information was
published on August 24, 2011, vol. 76, no. 164, page 53024-53025. The
collection involves requirements for certain repair stations to provide
documentation showing that persons handling hazmat for transportation
have been trained following DOT guidelines.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by November 25, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy DePaepe at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
e-mail at: Kathy A. DePaepe @faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0705.
    Title: Hazardous Materials Training Requirements.
    Form Numbers: There are no FAA forms associated with this
collection.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The FAA, as prescribed in 14 CFR parts 121 and 135,
requires certificate holders to submit manuals and hazmat training
programs, or revisions to an approved hazmat training program to obtain
initial and final approval as part of the FAA certification process.
Original certification is completed in accordance with 14 CFR part 119.
Continuing certification is completed in accordance with part 121 and
part 135. The FAA uses the approval process to determine compliance of
the hazmat training programs with the applicable regulations, national
policies and safe operating practices. The FAA must ensure that the
documents adequately establish safe operating procedures.
    Respondents: Approximately 2,772 operators.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 7 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 6,900 hours.

ADDRESSES:Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of
Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to oira_
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20503.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to

enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information collection;
and (d) ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the
quality of the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or
include your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this
information collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 20, 2011.
Albert R. Spence,
FAA Assistant Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises
Business Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2011-27713 Filed 10-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 98 (Friday, May 20, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31861-31862]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11870]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2016-0412]

Security Zone; Protection of Military Cargo, Captain of the Port
Zone Puget Sound

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce security zone regulations for the
Sitcum Waterway Security Zone in Commencement Bay, Tacoma, Washington
from 6 a.m. on May 17, 2016, through 11:59 p.m. on May 22, 2016, unless
cancelled sooner by the Captain of the Port. This action is necessary
to help provide for the security of Department of Defense assets and
military cargo located in those waters during that time period. Entry
into the Sitcum Waterway security zone is prohibited unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port Puget Sound or a Designated Representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.1321 will be enforced for the

Sitcum Waterway Security Zone from 6 a.m. on May 17, 2016 through 11:59
p.m. on May 22, 2016, unless cancelled sooner by the Captain of the
Port.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice of enforcement, call or email CWO Jeffrey Zappen, Sector Puget
Sound Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 206-
217-6076, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce 33 CFR 165.1321
security regulations for the Sitcum Waterway Security Zone described in
paragraph (c)(2) of that section from May 17, 2016, at 6 a.m. through
11:59 p.m. on May 22, 2016, unless cancelled sooner by the Captain of
the Port. The security zone is necessary to help provide for the
security of Department of Defense assets and military cargo located in
those waters during the enforcement period. Entry into the security
zone is prohibited unless authorized under Sec.  165.1321. Vessels
wishing to enter the security zone may request permission from the
Captain of the Port Puget Sound or a Designated Representative as
outlined in Sec.  165.1321.
    This notice of enforcement is issued under authority of 33 CFR
165.1321 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this document in the
Federal Register, the Coast Guard will provide the maritime community
with notification of this enforcement period via marine information
broadcasts and on-scene assets, if any.
    If the COTP determines that the Sitcum Waterway Security Zone need
not be enforced for the full duration stated in this notice, a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners will be used to grant general permission
to enter the regulated area.

    Dated: May 16, 2016.
M.W. Raymond,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2016-11870 Filed 5-19-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P