[Federal Register: October 24, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 205)]
[Notices]
[Page 60338-60340]
[DOCID:fr24oc07-70]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings  1

October 17, 2007.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC08-6-000.
    Applicants: Telocaset Wind Power Partners, LLC; High Prairie Wind
Farm II, LLC; Old Trail Wind Farm, LLC; Horizon Wind Ventures I, LLC;
2007 Vento II, LLC; General Electric Capital

Corporation; Wachovia Investment Holdings, LLC.
    Description: Telocaset Wind Power Partners, LLC et al. submits a
joint application for indirect disposition of jurisdictional
facilities.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071016-0118.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 13, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: EC08-7-000.
    Applicants: NorthWestern Corporation.
    Description: NorthWestern Corp submits an application requesting
authorization to acquire Owner Participant interest from SGE (New York)
Associates.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071016-0120.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 2, 2007.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
    Docket Numbers: EG08-6-000.
    Applicants: Santa Rosa Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Santa Rosa Energy Center, LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/16/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071016-5004.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 6, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: EG08-7-000.
    Applicants: Long Beach Peakers LLC.
    Description: Exempt Wholesale Generator Notice of Self-
Certification of Long Beach Peakers LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/16/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071016-5054.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 6, 2007.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER07-921-002.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc submits an amendment to the 7/23/
07 compliance filing.
    Filed Date: 10/15/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071017-0107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 5, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-49-000.
    Applicants: Michigan Electric Transmission Co., LLC.
    Description: Michigan Electric Transmission Co, LLC submits
revisions to distribution-transmission interconnection agreement with
Consumers Energy Co.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071015-0296.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 2, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-50-000.
    Applicants: E. ON U.S. LLC.
    Description: E. ON. U.S., LLC on behalf of Kentucky Utilities Co
submits a letter agreement with Big River Electric Corp.
    Filed Date: 10/15/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071017-0108.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 5, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-51-000.
    Applicants: New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
    Description: New York State Electric & Gas Corp submits a
supplement to Rate Schedule FERC 117--Facilities Agreement with the
Delaware County Electric Cooperative.
    Filed Date: 10/15/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071017-0109.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 5, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-52-000.
    Applicants: New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
    Description: New York State Electric & Gas Corp submits a
supplement to Rate Schedule FERC 72--Facilities Agreement with the
Municipal Board of the Village of Bath.
    Filed Date: 10/15/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071017-0110.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 5, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-53-000.
    Applicants: Termoelectrica U.S., LLC.
    Description: Report of Termoelectrica US, LLC re wholesale sales of
electricity in-markets operated by the California Independent System
Operator Corp.
    Filed Date: 10/09/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071017-0114.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 30, 2007.
    Docket Numbers: ER08-54-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England et al. jointly submits proposed
revisions to Sections I and II of the ISO Tariff to comply with FERC's
Order 890 preventing undue discrimination or preference in transmission
service.
    Filed Date: 10/11/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071017-0118.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 1, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-55-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
and PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc
and PJM Interconnection, LLC submits proposed revisions to the
Congestion Management Process of their Joint Operating Agreement.
    Filed Date: 10/15/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071017-0162.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 5, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-56-000; ER08-66-000.
    Applicants: Avista Corporation; Northwestern Corporation.
    Description: Avisata Corp & NorthWestern Corp submit two non-
confirming long-term service agreements with Northwestern Corp-Montana
Transmission Function.
    Filed Date: 10/16/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071017-0111.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 6, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-57-000.
    Applicants: AB Energy NE, Pty. Ltd.
    Description: AB Energy NE, Pty Ltd submits a notice of cancellation
of its FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 10/15/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071017-0052.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 5, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-58-000.
    Applicants: Wabash Valley Power Association, Inc.
    Description: Wabash Valley Power Association, Inc. submits a
supplement to Rate Schedule Filings.
    Filed Date: 10/16/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071017-0113.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 6, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-59-000
    Applicants: AB Energy NY, Pty. Ltd.
    Description: AB Energy NY, Pty Ltd. submits a notice of
cancellation of its FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 10/15/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071017-0053.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 5, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-60-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits a Network
Integration Transmission Service Agreement and Network Operating
Agreement.
    Filed Date: 10/16/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071017-0112.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 6, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-61-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. submits an emergency request for
changes to Market Rule 1.
    Filed Date: 10/16/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071016-0268.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 25, 2007.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:
    Docket Numbers: ES07-67-001.

    Applicants: National Grid USA.
    Description: Amendment to and Notice of Partial Withdrawal of
Application for Authorization to Issue Securities Under Section 204 of
the Federal Power Act, and Motion for Waiver of 15-Day Waiting Period
Under Commission Rule 216 of National Grid USA.
    Filed Date: 10/15/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071015-5140.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 5, 2007.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following open access
transmission tariff filings:
    Docket Numbers: OA07-90-001.
    Applicants: MidAmerican Energy Company.
    Description: Mid American Energy's substitute tariff sheet to
reflect the correct methodology for calculation of transmission reserve
margin in its Open Access Transmission Tariff--Attachment C filed
September 11, 2007.
    Filed Date: 10/16/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071016-5040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 6, 2007.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Acting Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-20902 Filed 10-23-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46099-46101]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18723]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Special Permit Applications; Office of Hazardous Materials Safety

AGENCY: Pipeline And Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Notice of actions on Special Permit Applications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations (49 CFR part 107,
subpart B), notice is hereby given of the actions on special permits
applications in (June to June 2015). The mode of transportation
involved are identified by a number in the ``Nature of Application''
portion of the table below as follows: 1--Motor vehicle, 2--Rail
freight, 3--Cargo vessel, 4--Cargo aircraft only, 5--Passenger-carrying
aircraft. Application numbers prefixed by the letters EE represent
applications for Emergency Special Permits. It should be noted that
some of the sections cited were those in effect at the time certain
special permits were issued.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 20, 2015.
Ryan Paquet,
Director, Approvals and Permits Division.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Nature of special permit
           S.P. No.                    Applicant               Regulation(s)                  thereof
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       MODIFICATION SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8451-M.......................  Special Devices, Inc.     49 CFR 173.320,           To modify the special permit
                                Mesa, AR.                 173.54(a), 173.56(b),     to authorize forbidden
                                                          173.57, 173.58, and       explosives (Section
                                                          173.60.                   173.56(j)).
10180-M......................  Fireboy-Xintex, Inc.      49 CFR 173.304(a)(2);     To modify the special permit
                                Grand Rapids, MI.         180.209.                  to authorize an additional
                                                                                fire extinguisher design.

14301-M......................  Gascon (Pty) Ltd Elsied   49 CFR 178.274(b) and     To modify the special permit
                                River, South Africa.      18.276(b)(1).             to authorize manufacture of
                                                                                UN portable tanks in
                                                                                accordance with ASME Section
                                                                                VIII Division 2, latest
                                                                                edition
14849-M......................  Call2Recycle, Inc.        49 CFR 172.200, 172.300,  To modify the special permit
                                Atlanta, GA.              172.400.                  to authorize dry cell
                                                                                alkaline batteries up to 12
                                                                                volts in combination with
                                                                                any other used or spent
                                                                                batteries rated greater than
                                                                                9-volts in the same package.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           NEW SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16193-N......................  CHI Technologies, Inc.    49 CFR 180.209(a).......  To authorize the
                                Santa Paula, CA.                                    transportation in commerce
                                                                                of certain DOT 4BW cylinders
                                                                                that are requalified every
                                                                                10 years instead of every 5
                                                                                years when used exclusively
                                                                                in non-corrosive service.
                                                                                (mode 1)
16261-N......................  Dexsil Corporation        49 CFR 172.101(c)(2),     To authorize the
                                Hamden, CT.               Special Provisions A3,    transportation in commerce
                                                          173.13(c)(2)(ii),         of small quantities of
                                                          173.13(c)(1)(iii),        certain Division 4.3
                                                          173.13(c)(1)(iv),         materials in specially-
                                                          5;3.1.1 of the ICAO TI,   designed Packing shipped
                                                          4;6.2, Packing            shipped without labels.
                                                          Instruction 480 of the    (modes 1, 2, 4)
                                                          ICAO TI.
16232-N......................  Linde Gas North America   49 CFR 171.23(a)(1),      To authorize the
                                LLC Murray Hill, NJ.      171.23(a)(2)(ii)          transportation in commerce
                                                          171.23(a)(3),             of non-DOT cylinders
                                                          173.301(f)(3),            containing a Division 2.2
                                                          173.301(g).               compressed gas. (modes 1, 2,
                                                                                3)
16348-N......................  Premier Filling Company,  49 CFR 173.306(a)(3)(v).  To authorize the
                                Inc. Hoffman Estates,                               transportation in commerce
                                IL.                                                 of Division 2.2 hazardous
                                                                                materials in certain DOT
                                                                                Specification 2Q non-
                                                                                refillable steel inner
                                                                                containers, which have been
                                                                                tested by an alternative
                                                                                method in lieu of the hot
                                                                                water bath test. (mode 1)
16394-N......................  Cellco Partnership        49 CFR Subparts C         To authorize the
                                Basking Ridge, NJ.        through H of Part 172,    transportation in commerce
                                                          173.185(f).               of damaged or defective
                                                                                lithium ion cells and
                                                                                batteries and equipment
                                                                                containing these cells or
                                                                                batteries that originally
                                                                                met the requirements under
                                                                                49 CFR 173.185(c). (modes 1,
                                                                                2)
16415-N......................  Volkswagen Group of       49 CFR 173.302a.........  To authorize the
                                America VWGoA) Herndon,                             transportation in commerce
                                VA.                                                 of certain Division 2.1 and
                                                                                2.2 compressed gases innon-
                                                                                DOT specification cylinders
                                                                                manufactured to a foreign
                                                                                specification. (modes 1, 3)
16417-N......................  CB&I AREVA MOX Services,  49 CFR 173.420(a)(2)(i)   To authorize the one-way
                                LLC Aiken, SC.            173.420(a)(3(i).          transportation in commerce
                                                                                of six 48G cylinders
                                                                                containing depleted uranium
                                                                                hexafluoride that do not
                                                                                meet the specifications in
                                                                                ANSI NI4.1. (mode 1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        EMERGENCY SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16437-M......................  U.S. Department of        49 CFR 173.56(b), and     To modify the special permit
                                Justice, Bureau of        172.320.                  to authorize additional
                                Alcohol, Tobacco,                                   sites for the research
                                Firearms and Explosives                             testing project. (mode 1)
                                ATF) Washington, DC.
16519-N......................  Space Exploration         49 CFR 173.62 Packing     To authorize the
                                Technologies Corp.        Instruction 138.          transportation in commerce
                                Hawthorne, CA.                                      of certain hazardous
                                                                                materials that are
                                                                                components of the Falcon
                                                                                Launch Vehicle Flight
                                                                                Termination System (FTS).
                                                                                (modes 1, 3)
16489-N......................  Coastal Helicopters Van   49 CFR 172.101 Column     To authorize the
                                Nuys, CA.                 (9B), Sec.                transportation in commerce
                                                          172.204(c)(3), Sec.       of certain hazardous
                                                          173.27(b)(2), Sec.        materials by 14 CFR Part 133
                                                          175.30(a)(1), Sec.        Rotorcraft External Load
                                                          Sec.   172.200,           Operations, transporting
                                                          172.300, 172.400,         hazardous materials attached
                                                          173.302(f)(3) and Sec.    to or suspended from an
                                                           175.75.                  aircraft, in remote areas of
                                                                                the U.S. only, without being
                                                                                subject to hazard
                                                                                communication requirements,
                                                                                quantity limitations and
                                                                                certain loading and stowage
                                                                                requirements. (mode 4)
16507-N......................  Atlas Air, Inc.           49 CFR 172.101 Column     To authorize the
                                Purchase, NY.             (8B), 172.204(o)(3).      transportation in commerce
                                                                                of certain explosives, by
                                                                                cargo aircraft only, which
                                                                                is otherwise forbidden by
                                                                                the regulations. (mode 4)
16508-N......................  Kalitta Air, LLC          49 CFR 172.101 Table      To authorize the one-time
                                Ypsilanti, MI.            Column (9B),              transportation in commerce
                                                          172.204(c)(3),            of certain explosives that
                                                          173.27(b)(2), (3), and    are forbidden for
                                                          175.30(a)(1).             transportation by cargo only
                                                                                aircraft. (mode 4)
16509-N......................  Kalitta Air, LLC          49 CFR 172.101 Table      To authorize the one-time
                                Ypsilanti, MI.            Column (9B),              transportation in commerce
                                                          172.204(c)(3),            of certain explosives that
                                                          173.27(b)(2), (3), and    are forbidden for
                                                          175.30(a)(1).             transportation by cargo only
                                                                                aircraft. (mode 4)

16510-N......................  Apple, Inc. Cupertino,    49 CFR 173.185(f).......  To authorize the
                                CA.                                                 transportation in commerce
                                                                                of lithium batteries in non-
                                                                                DOT specification packaging.
                                                                                (modes 1, 3)
16502-N......................  Kalitta Air, LLC          49 CFR 172.101 Table      To authorize the one-time
                                Ypsilanti, MI.            Column (9B),              transportation in commerce
                                                          172.204(c)(3),            of certain explosives that
                                                          173.27(b)(2), (3), and    are forbidden for
                                                          175.30(a)(1).             transportation by cargo only
                                                                                aircraft. (mode 4)
16503-N......................  Construction              49 CFR 172.101 Hazardous  To authorize the
                                Helicopters, Inc.         Materials Table Column    transportation in commerce
                                Howell, MI.               (9B), 172.200,            of propane by 14 CFR part
                                                          172.204(c)(3), 172.300,   133 Rotorcraft External Load
                                                          172.400, 173.315(j).      Operations transporting
                                                                                hazardous materials attached
                                                                                to or suspended from an
                                                                                aircraft without being
                                                                                subject to certain hazard
                                                                                communication requirements,
                                                                                quantity limitations and
                                                                                certain loading and stowage
                                                                                requirements. (mode 4)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      MODIFICATION SPECIAL PERMIT WITHDRAWN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15393-M......................  Savannah Acid Plant LLC   49 CFR 173.31(d)(1)(vi).  To modify the special permit
                                Savannah, GA.                                       to discontinue tracking 10%
                                                                                of the fleet individual
                                                                                railcars, and instead
                                                                                monitor the annual change
                                                                                out for the entire fleet.
16420-M......................  Construction              49 CFR 172.101 Hazardous  To modify the special permit
                                Helicopters, Inc.         Materials Table Column    originally issued on an
                                Howell, MI.               (9B), 172.200,            emergency basis to
                                                          172.204(c)(3), 172.300,   authorized an additional two
                                                          172.400, 173.315(j).      years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          NEW SPECIAL PERMIT WITHDRAWN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16471-N......................  CVS Pharmacy, Inc.        49 CFR 172.312(a)(2),     To authorize the
                                Woonsocket, RI.           172.315, 172.316.         transportation in commerce
                                                                                of small quantities of ORM-D
                                                                                materials and compatible
                                                                                limited quantity materials
                                                                                in hard plastic packagings
                                                                                (shipping totes) without
                                                                                certain markings when
                                                                                shipped between CVS
                                                                                Pharmacy, Inc. distribution
                                                                                centers. (mode 1)
16499-N......................  Princeton University      49 CFR 173.199..........  To authorize the
                                Princeton, NJ.                                      transportation in commerce
                                                                                of live mice infected with
                                                                                the hepatitis B virus in
                                                                                alternative packaging. (mode
                                                                                1)
16505-N......................  Gas Cylinder              49 CFR 172.301(c),        To authorize the manufacture,
                                Technologies Inc. Belle   178.35(f)(1)(ii).         mark, sale and use of DOT
                                River, Canada.                                      specification 3AA cylinders
                                                                                marked with the lot number
                                                                                in lieu of the serial
                                                                                number. (modes 1, 2, 3, 4,
                                                                                5)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     DENIED
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7945-M.......................  Request by Pacific Scientific Company Simi Valley, CA June 4, 2015. To modify the
                                       special permit to exempt sufficient outage when cylinders are full.
14227-M......................    Request by Aluminum Tank Industries, Inc. Winter Haven, FL. June 10, 2015. To
                                modify the special permit to authorize a pump and hose to remain attached during
                                 transportation when the discharge outlet is below the highest point of the tank
                                    and allow the tanks to be marked as UN 31B intermediate bulk containers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2015-18723 Filed 7-31-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4909-60-M


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39463-39465]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16822]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-64769; File No. SR-NSCC-2011-04]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing
Corporation; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rules
Relating to Discontinuing Dividend Settlement Service, Funds Only
Settlement Service, Data Distribution Box Services, and Changes to the
Envelope Settlement Service

June 29, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder \2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 15, 2011, National Securities Clearing Corporation (``NSCC'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared primarily by NSCC.\3\ The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ The text of the proposed rule change is attached as Exhibit
5 to NSCC's filing, which is available at http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/rule_filings/2011/nscc/2011-04.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to amend NSCC's rules
relating to NSCC's incorporation of its Dividend Settlement Service
(``DSS'') and Funds Only Settlement Service (``FOSS'') into the
Envelope Settlement Service (``ESS'') and NSCC's discontinuing of its
Data Distribution Boxes Service (``DDBS''). The proposed rule change
would also make certain changes to ESS processing.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NSCC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NSCC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A),
(B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of these
statements.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries
prepared by NSCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    DSS, FOSS, and ESS operate similarly in that they are non-
guaranteed services of NSCC through which NSCC members exchange
physical envelopes through a centralized location at NSCC. Pursuant to
Rule 43 of NSCC's Rules and Procedures, DSS centralizes claims
processing for collection and payment of dividends and interest between
NSCC members through the exchange of envelopes through the facilities
of NSCC. Pursuant to Rule 41 of NSCC's Rules and Procedures, FOSS
centralizes money-only settlements for NSCC members through the
exchange of paperwork delivered to and received by NSCC members through
NSCC's facilities. Pursuant to Rule 9 and Addendum D of NSCC's Rules
and Procedures, ESS allows an NSCC member to physically deliver a
sealed envelope containing securities and such other items as NSCC may
from time to time permit to a specified NSCC member. The money
settlement associated with ESS, DSS, and FOSS transactions occurs
through NSCC's end-of-day settlement process.
Discontinuing FOSS and DSS and Merging Functionality into ESS
    NSCC has offered DSS since its founding. FOSS was created in 1983
to remove money-only settlement activity, which prior to that time was
included in ESS, from ESS in order to facilitate what was then NSCC's
guaranty of settlement of securities transactions processed through
ESS.\5\ The use of each of these services has steadily declined in
recent years due to increased dematerialization of securities and
automation of transactions. In light of this decline and the
elimination of the guaranty of ESS transactions, NSCC is proposing to
amend its rules to discontinue the separate DSS and FOSS services and
to allow members to

process dividends and funds-only settlement activities through ESS.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The guaranty of ESS settlement was in effect from 1983 until
2010. Securities Exchange Act Notice 34-61618 (March 1, 2010) [File
No. SR-NSCC-2010-01], 75 FR 10542 (March 8, 2010).
    \6\ In order to distinguish securities transfers from other ESS
activity, NSCC would add a required indicator for input by members
to disclose whether or not a security is included in an envelope.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Closing of DDBS
    DDBS was traditionally used to distribute hard copy Important
Notices, clearing reports, and other informational documents to NSCC
members. Today members: (a) receive Important Notices through the Web
site of NSCC's parent, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, at
http://www.dtcc.com, (b) receive clearing reports through electronic
communications, and (c) exchange other information that previously
might have been transferred through DDBS, via email, facsimile, courier
services, the U.S. Postal Service, and other delivery mechanisms. The
DDBS service has become obsolete as a result of the use of these other
more efficient means of distribution. Accordingly, NSCC is proposing to
amend its rules to discontinue DDBS.
ESS Processing Changes

Increased Transparency

    NSCC performs certain regulatory tracking and reporting functions
(e.g., OFAC screening) for securities transactions processed through
NSCC. With respect to some NSCC services, such as Continuous Net
Settlement (``CNS''),\7\ NSCC electronically receives information as to
security identification and transaction size that facilitates such
tracking and reporting. However, similar electronic information is not
available for securities transferred through ESS. In order to
facilitate transparency in this regard, NSCC is proposing (1) to
require its members to provide a security identifier (i.e., CUSIP or
ISIN) and include quantity delivered for all securities delivered
through ESS, (2) to restrict members to one security issue per
envelope, and (3) to prohibit the comingling of securities with other
items. The proposed rule change would also allow NSCC to require its
members provide it with additional information that NSCC from time to
time deems necessary to facilitate ESS processing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ CNS is an on-going automated accounting system operated by
NSCC which nets today's settling trades with yesterday's closing
positions in eligible securities to produce new short or long
positions per security issue for each NSCC member. Since NSCC is
always the contraside for all transactions, NSCC is able to identify
the securities for transactions submitted to CNS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Separately, the proposed rule change would also allow for automatic
updates to NSCC's Obligation Warehouse service with respect to
securities transactions that settle though ESS where the delivering
member includes an Obligation Warehouse control number with the
respective envelope delivery to ESS. However, this feature will not be
implemented concurrently with the other changes proposed by this
filing, but rather it would be announced by Important Notice at a later
date.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ For information on the Obligation Warehouse service, see
Exchange Act Release 63588 (December 21, 2010), 75 FR 82112
(December 29, 2010) [File No. SR-NSCC-2010-11].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

NSCC Facilities Used for ESS Deliveries

    Under the proposed rule change, NSCC's rules would be updated to
change references to ESS deliveries and receives occurring through
NSCC's New York City facility to use general language allowing NSCC to
provide the service through any NSCC facility as announced by Important
Notice.

Segregation of Activity Within ESS

    As mentioned above, the rule change proposes to require that
members not comingle different issues of securities in the same
envelope or with other activity conducted through ESS. Pursuant to the
proposed rule changes, NSCC would also be allowed to prohibit
comingling between funds-only and dividend settlement items.
Proposed Rule Changes
    With respect to the above, NSCC proposes to make changes to its
rules and procedures as follows:

Rule 6--Distribution Facilities

    NSCC's Rule 6 presently provides for the establishment of DDBS.
Under the proposed rule change, the text of this rule would be deleted
to reflect the elimination of DDBS.

Rule 9--Delivery and Receipt of Securities

    Under the proposed rule change, NSCC's Rule 9 (currently entitled
``Delivery and Receipt of Securities''), pursuant to which NSCC offers
ESS, would be renamed as ``Envelope Settlement Service'' and would be
amended to: (1) Reflect the incorporation of FOSS and DSS into ESS, (2)
incorporate the ESS processing changes described above, (3) allow for
automatic updates to NSCC's Obligation Warehouse service with respect
to securities transactions that settle through ESS where the delivering
member includes an Obligation Warehouse Control Number with the
respective envelope delivery to ESS, and (4) make other conforming
changes to integrate rule provisions relating to FOSS and DSS into Rule
9.

Rule 41--Funds Only Settlement Service

    NSCC's Rule 41 provides for the establishment of and procedures for
FOSS. Under the proposed rule change, the text of this rule will be
deleted to reflect the elimination of FOSS as a separate service.

Rule 43--Dividend Settlement Service

    NSCC's Rule 43 provides for the establishment of and procedures for
DSS. Under the proposed rule change, the text of this rule would be
deleted to reflect the elimination of DSS as a separate service.

Addendum A--Fee Structure

    NSCC's Fee Schedule would be revised to delete charges for the
discontinued services mentioned above. Under the proposed rule change,
all services offered under the newly combined ESS would be subject to
the existing ESS charge for deliveries and receives.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ In addition, two separate line items relating to ESS fees
will be consolidated into one and reflect that the combined fee
applies to all ESS deliveries and receives (including intercity).
Also, as a technical change, fees relating to the New York Window
Service would be deleted from the Fee Schedule as that service is no
longer an offering of NSCC and certain other fees relating to
physical processing functions that have become obsolete (which
appear in the Fee Schedule as items A through F under the heading
``Other Service Fees'') would also be deleted. For additional
information on the discontinuation of the New York Window Service at
NSCC, see Exchange Act Release No. 40179 (July 8, 1998), 63 FR 38221
(July 15, 1998) (File Nos. SR-DTC-98-09, SR-NSCC-98-05).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Addendum D--Statement of Policy--Envelope Settlement Service, Mutual
Fund Services, Insurance and Retirement Processing and Other Services
Offered by the Corporation

    Addendum D, a statement of policy with regard to ESS and other NSCC
services, provides, among other things, that money-only settlement
charges should not be processed through ESS. NSCC proposed to amend
Addendum D to conform to the changes proposed above. The proposed
revised Addendum D would also include a technical change that clarifies
that NSCC may reverse a member's debits or credits that are related to
the Commission Bill Service.
Implementation Date
    Upon Commission approval of this rule filing, the implementation
date of the proposed changes described above will be announced by
Important Notice; however, the elimination of DDBS will not take effect
until approximately (but no less than) 30 days from the date of the
Commission's approval.
    The proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the

Act, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to
NSCC because it facilitates the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions by increasing processing
efficiencies through the merger of several similar services for
physical processing. In addition, the proposed rule change is
consistent with Recommendation 12 of the CPSS/IOSCO Recommendations for
Central Counterparties because it promotes efficiency in services
offered to members by assimilating several modes of physical processing
into a single service.

(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    NSCC does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose
any burden on competition.

(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been
solicited NSCC.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within forty-five days of the date of publication of this notice in
the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission
may designate up to ninety days of such date if it finds such longer
period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the
Commission will:
    (A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change; or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NSCC-2011-04 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submission should refer to File Number SR-NSCC-2011-04. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090, on official business days between the
hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of NSCC
and on NSCC's Web site at http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/rule
filings/2011/nscc/2011-04.pdf. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NSCC-2011-04 and should be submitted on or before July
27, 2011.

    For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-16822 Filed 7-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 66 (Monday, April 6, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19200-19203]
[FR Doc No: 2020-07082]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-88526; File No. SR-CBOE-2020-024]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating
To Amend Its Fees Schedule

March 31, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 23, 2020, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe
Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC''
or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') proposes
to amend its fees schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Footnote 12 of the Fees Schedule,
which governs pricing changes in the event the Exchange trading floor
becomes inoperable. In the event the trading floor becomes inoperable,
the Exchange will continue to operate in a screen-based only
environment using a floorless configuration of the System that is
operational while the trading floor facility is inoperable. The
Exchange would operate using that configuration only until the
Exchange's trading floor facility became operational. Open outcry
trading would not be available in the event the trading floor becomes
inoperable. Particularly, the Exchange proposes to incorporate into
Footnote 12, changes related to Related Future Cross (``RFC'')
transactions.
    By way of background, the Exchange recently adopted Rule
5.24(e)(1)(D), which provides that in the event the trading floor is
inoperable, a Trading Permit Holder (``TPH'') may execute an RFC order,
which is comprised of an SPX or VIX option combo order coupled with a
contra-side order or orders totaling an equal number of option combo
orders, which is identified to the Exchange as being part of an
exchange of option contracts for related futures positions.\3\
Particularly, Rule 5.24(e)(1)(D) permits unexposed crosses of riskless
packaged transactions (i.e., RFC transactions) which include SPX/SPXW
or VIX option combos offset by futures contracts. The proposal to allow
RFC transactions was adopted to replicate functionality that is
otherwise available when the Exchange is operating with an open outcry
environment. RFC transactions are intended to provide means for
transferring risk from futures positions into related combo positions
for purposes of reducing capital requirements on portfolios held at
bank clearing firms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See SR-CBOE-2020-023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange first proposes to provide that in the event the
trading floor becomes inoperable, the Exchange shall waive the SPX and
SPXW Execution Surcharges for SPX and SPXW volume executed as an RFC
order for the duration of time the Exchange operates in a screen-based
only environment. The Exchange currently assesses a SPX Execution
Surcharge of $0.21 per contract and a SPXW Execution Surcharge of $0.13
per

contract for non-Market Maker orders in SPX and SPXW, respectively that
are executed electronically (with some exceptions).\4\ The Execution
Surcharges were adopted to ensure that there is reasonable cost
equivalence between the primary execution channels for SPX and SPXW.
More specifically, the Execution Surcharges minimize the cost
differentials between manual and electronic executions, which is in the
interest of the Exchange as it must both maintain robust electronic
systems as well as provide for economic opportunity for floor brokers
to continue to conduct business, as the Exchange believes they serve an
important function in achieving price discovery and customer
executions.\5\ In the event the trading floor becomes inoperable, the
only execution available for SPX and SPXW would be electronic
executions. The Exchange still wishes to encourage floor brokers to
continue to conduct business on the Exchange, albeit electronically
when the floor is inoperable. To that end, in order to approximate the
trading floor environment electronically, the Exchange will allow TPHs
to execute RFC orders electronically, as noted above. As such, the
Exchange does not wish to discourage floor brokers from executing SPX
and SPXW RFC transactions when the trading floor is inoperable by
assessing the Execution Surcharges such volume. Indeed, in the absence
of the trading floor being inoperable, RFC orders would otherwise
execute on the floor \6\ and not be subject to the Execution
Surcharges. The Exchange notes that AIM executions are similarly
excluded from the Execution Surcharges as such functionality is
similarly only made available for SPX in the event the trading floor is
inoperable.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Cboe Options Fees Schedule, Footnote 21.
    \5\ See e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71295 (January
14, 2014) 79 FR 3443 (January 21, 2014) (SR-CBOE-2013-129).
    \6\ If the trading floor is open, floor brokers may execute
crosses of option combos (i.e., synthetic futures) on the trading
floor on behalf of market participants who were exchanging futures
contracts for related options positions. Market participants enter
into these exchanges in or to swap related exposures. For instance,
if a market participant has positions in VIX options but would
prefer to hold a corresponding position in VIX futures (such as, for
example, to reduce margin or risk related to the option positions),
that market participant may swap its VIX options positions with
another market participant's VIX futures positions that have
corresponding risk exposure.
    \7\ See Cboe Options Fees Schedule, Footnote 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange next proposes to adopt an RFC Execution Surcharge for
RFC initiating orders for all market participants which would apply
only when the Exchange operates in a screen-based only environment and
which would be invoiced to the executing TPH. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to adopt a $0.05 per contract fee for SPX and SPXW
RFC initiating orders and a $0.04 per contract fee for VIX RFC
initiating orders. The Exchange notes that currently, SPX, SPXW and VIX
orders executed via open-outcry are assessed floor brokerage fees.
Specifically, SPX/SPXW orders are assessed a floor brokerage fee of
$0.04 per contract fee for non-crossed orders and a $0.02 per contract
fee for crossed orders and VIX orders are assessed a floor brokerage
fee of $0.03 per contract for non-crossed orders and $0.015 per
contract for crossed orders. The Exchange notes that in the event the
trading floor becomes inoperable, volume that would otherwise be
executed on the floor would have to be executed electronically. The
Exchange believes it's appropriate to continue to assess this volume a
modest fee, notwithstanding the fact that it is being moved to an
electronic channel. The Exchange notes the proposed fees are the same
as applied to SPX/SPXW and VIX AIM Agency/Primary Orders (i.e., ``AIM
Execution Surcharge''), which was adopted recently for similar reasons
and is applied only in the event the trading floor is inoperable. The
Exchange therefore proposes to amend the title to AIM Execution
Surcharge to ``AIM and RFC Execution Surcharge Fee'' and modify
Footnote 12 to clarify that this Surcharge will also apply to volume
executed as an RFC transaction.
    The Exchange also proposes to provide that SPX/SPXW and VIX
contracts executed as an RFC order during the time when the Exchange
operates in a screen-based only environment will not count towards the
1,000 contract thresholds for the electronic SPX/SPXW and VIX Tier
Appointment Fees. Currently, the Exchange assesses separate monthly
Tier Appointment Fees to electronic and floor Market-Maker holding a
Market-Maker Electronic Access Permit or Market-Maker Floor Permit,
respectively, that trade SPX (including SPXW) and VIX contracts at any
time during the month. The Exchange proposes to exclude SPX/SPXW and
VIX volume executed as an RFC order during the time when the Exchange
operates in a screen-based only environment, as the Exchange does not
wish to discourage the sending of such orders during that time. The
Exchange notes that the electronic Tier Appointment fees are intended
to be assessed to Market-Maker TPHs who act as Market-Makers
electronically and engage in trading of these products (as opposed to
those who normally execute volume via open outcry, but must participate
electronically due to the trading floor being inoperable).
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\8\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\10\ which requires that Exchange rules
provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its Trading Permit Holders and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change to waive SPX and
SPXW Execution Surcharges for RFC orders in the event the trading floor
becomes inoperable is reasonable because market participants will not
be subject to these extra surcharge for these executions. As noted
above, the Execution Surcharges minimize the cost differentials between
manual and electronic executions, which is in the interest of the
Exchange as it must both maintain robust electronic systems as well as
provide for economic opportunity for floor brokers to continue to
conduct business, as the Exchange believes they serve an important
function in achieving price discovery and customer executions.\11\ In
the event the trading floor becomes inoperable, the Exchange still
wishes to incentivize floor brokers to conduct business on the
Exchange, albeit electronically and as such does not wish to assess a
surcharge on volume that was otherwise executed on floor and not

electronically as an RFC order. As discussed above, market participants
may be able to execute RFC orders comprised of SPX or SPXW options
electronically in the event the trading floor is inoperable in order to
best approximate the trading floor in an electronic environment.
Indeed, the Exchange believes waiving the Execution Surcharges for
volume executed as an RFC order in the event the trading floor is
inoperable will promote and encourage trading of these products
notwithstanding the fact that manual executions are no longer
available. Additionally, the Exchange does not wish to assess the
Execution Surcharges on RFC transactions as such transactions are
intended to replicate functionality that is otherwise available when
the Exchange is operating with an open outcry environment and is
further intended to provide means for transferring risk from futures
positions into related combo positions for purposes of reducing capital
requirements on portfolios held at bank clearing firms. The Exchange
believes the proposed change is also equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory as it applies uniformly to all similarly situated market
participants that submit RFC orders who will be subject to equivalent
execution costs while the trading floor is inoperable. Also, as noted
above, the Exchange notes that AIM executions are similarly excluded
from the Execution Surcharges as such functionality is similarly only
made available in the event the trading floor is inoperable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71295 (January 14,
2014) 79 FR 3443 (January 21, 2014) (SR-CBOE-2013-129).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposal to adopt an RFC Execution
Surcharge for SPX/SPXW and VIX RFC initiating orders is reasonable as
the proposed rates are similar to the total rates charged for volume
that is executed via open-outcry.\12\ The Exchange also notes that the
Fees Schedule already provides for a similar scenario of such rates
being assessed in the event the trading floor is inoperable. For
example, Footnote 15 of the Fees Schedule provides that in the event
the Exchange's exclusively listed options must be traded at a Back-up
Exchange pursuant to Cboe Options Rule 5.26, the Back-up Exchange has
agreed to apply the per contract and per contract side fees (i.e., the
Floor Brokerage fees) to such transactions. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes it's similarly appropriate to adopt and apply similar fees to
transactions that must occur via an electronic execution channel
(instead of on a Back-Up Exchange) due to the Exchange's trading floor
being inoperable. The Exchange also notes that as discussed above, it
is not otherwise assessing the SPX/SPXW Execution Surcharges on RFC
SPX/SPXW orders. The Exchange believes the proposed change is also
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory as it applies uniformly to
all similarly situated market participants that submit RFC orders who
will be subject to equivalent execution costs while the trading floor
is inoperable. Additionally, the Exchange notes the RFC Execution
Surcharge is the same as the AIM Execution Surcharge, which was
recently adopted for similar reasons for when the trading floor is
inoperable.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Cboe Options Fees Schedule, Floor Brokerage Fees.
    \13\ See SR-CBOE-2020-021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes its proposal to provide that SPX/SPXW and VIX
contracts executed as an RFC order during a time when the Exchange
operates in a screen-based only environment will not count towards the
1,000 contract thresholds for the electronic SPX/SPXW and VIX Tier
Appointment Fees is reasonable as Market-Makers that would otherwise
meet the current contract thresholds due to the need to participate on
the Exchange electronically will not be subject to an additional Tier
Appointment Fee for volume executed as an RFC order. The Exchange
believes the proposed change is reasonable as the Tier Appointment fees
were intended to apply to TPHs who act as electronic Market-Makers in
SPX/SPX and VIX, not those that, notwithstanding the trading floor
being inoperable, would act as floor Market-Makers and trade these
products. Accordingly, the Exchange does not wish to assess the Tier
Appointment fees to Market-Makers who do not usually conduct
significant electronic volume in these products and would not
participate electronically if not for the trading floor being
inoperable. Additionally, the Exchange does not wish to discourage the
use of RFC orders for SPX/SPXW and VIX as RFC transactions would
provide Market-Makers with needed relief from the effect of the current
exposure method (``CEM'') on the options market. The proposed change is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it will apply
uniformly to all similarly situated market participants, as it applies
to all Market-Makers trading in these products. The Exchange notes such
exclusion is similar to the exclusion of SPX/SPXW and VIX volume
executed via AIM.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Cboe Options Fees Schedule, Footnote 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will
impose any burden on competition that are not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange notes the
proposed changes are not intended to address any competitive issue, but
rather to address fee changes it believes are reasonable in the event
the trading floor becomes inoperable, thereby only permitting
electronic participation on the Exchange. The Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intramarket
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because the proposed changes apply equally to all
similarly situated market participants. The Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule changes will impose any burden on intermarket
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because the proposed changes only affect trading on
the Exchange in limited circumstances.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \15\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \16\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.

Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2020-024 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2020-024. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2020-024, and should be submitted
on or before April 27, 2020.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-07082 Filed 4-3-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 95 (Friday, May 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28504-28505]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11266]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG14-50-000.
    Applicants: SEP II, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of EWG Status of SEP II,
LLC.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5059.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Docket Numbers: EG14-51-000.
    Applicants: NRG Solar Dandan LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5126.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2819-002.
    Applicants: ALLETE, Inc.
    Description: Supplement to February 28, 2014 Notice of Non-Material
Change in Status of ALLETE, Inc.
    Filed Date: 4/24/14.
    Accession Number: 20140424-5135.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/15/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4315-002; ER10-3144-002.
    Applicants: Gila River Power LLC, Entegra Power Services LLC.
    Description: Gila River Power LLC, et. al. Supplement to June 28,
2013 Triennial Market Power Update for the Southwest Region.
    Filed Date: 5/7/14.
    Accession Number: 20140507-5204.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/19/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-2301-003.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Marketing, Inc.
    Description: Compliance Filing--Corrected Attached Tariff to
Previous Filing of May 5 to be effective 10/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/20/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-83-002.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 2014-05-07--Docket No. ER14-83-002--External Resources
Compliance to be effective 12/13/2013.
    Filed Date: 5/7/14.
    Accession Number: 20140507-5139.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1290-001.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 2014-05-07--Docket No. ER14-1290-001--Schedule 34
Compliance Filing to be effective 4/8/2014.
    Filed Date: 5/7/14.
    Accession Number: 20140507-5132.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1902-000.
    Applicants: Bendwind, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/8/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/7/14.
    Accession Number: 20140507-5148.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1903-000.
    Applicants: Broken Bow Wind, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/8/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/7/14.
    Accession Number: 20140507-5149.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1904-000.
    Applicants: Crofton Bluffs Wind, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/8/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/7/14.
    Accession Number: 20140507-5150.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1905-000.
    Applicants: Energy Alternatives Wholesale, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Tariff to be effective 5/8/2014.
    Filed Date: 5/7/14.
    Accession Number: 20140507-5151.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1906-000.
    Applicants: GenConn Energy LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/8/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/7/14.
    Accession Number: 20140507-5152.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1907-000.
    Applicants: Mountain Wind Power, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/8/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/7/14.
    Accession Number: 20140507-5156.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1908-000.
    Applicants: Mountain Wind Power II LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/8/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/7/14.
    Accession Number: 20140507-5159.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1909-000.
    Applicants: Storm Lake Power Partners I LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/8/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/7/14.
    Accession Number: 20140507-5161.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1910-000.
    Applicants: TAIR Windfarm, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/8/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/7/14.
    Accession Number: 20140507-5162.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1911-000.
    Applicants: Nalcor Energy.
    Description: Notice of Cancellation to be effective 5/8/2014.
    Filed Date: 5/7/14.
    Accession Number: 20140507-5175.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1912-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Request for limited, one-time waiver of certain
provisions of its Open Access Transmission, Energy and Operating
Reserve Markets Tariff of Midcontinent Independent System Operator,
Inc.
    Filed Date: 5/7/14.
    Accession Number: 20140507-5207.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/28/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1913-000.
    Applicants: Calpine Oneta Power, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/9/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5075.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1914-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Mexico.
    Description: PNM-Jicarilla PPA to be effective 5/9/2014.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5076.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1915-000.
    Applicants: Bayou Cove Peaking Power, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/9/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5077.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1916-000.
    Applicants: Forward WindPower LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/9/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5078.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1917-000.
    Applicants: Groen Wind, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/9/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5083.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1918-000.
    Applicants: Hillcrest Wind, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/9/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5085.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1919-000.
    Applicants: Jeffers Wind 20, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/9/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5086.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1920-000.
    Applicants: Laredo Ridge Wind, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/9/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5087.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1921-000.
    Applicants: San Juan Mesa Wind Project, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/9/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5088.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1922-000.
    Applicants: Sleeping Bear, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/9/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5089.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1923-000.
    Applicants: Wildorado Wind, LLC.
    Description: Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 5/9/
2014.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5090.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1924-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Notice of Cancellation of Original Service Agreement
No. 3342; Queue No. W1-122 to be effective 5/6/2014.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5110.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1925-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Notice of Cancellation of Original Service Agreement
No. 2977; Queue No. W2-074 to be effective 5/6/2014.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5114.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1926-000.
    Applicants: Exelon Generation Company, LLC.
    Description: Reassignment Tariff Changes to be effective 7/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5115.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1927-000.
    Applicants: CED White River Solar 2, LLC.
    Description: Application for Market-Based Rate Authorization to be
effective 6/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 5/8/14.
    Accession Number: 20140508-5116.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/29/14.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 8, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-11266 Filed 5-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 26, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 207)]
[Notices]
[Page 60836]
[DOCID:fr26oc07-53]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP08-10-000]

Trunkline Gas Company, LLC; Notice of Request Under Blanket
Authorization

October 19, 2007.
    Take notice that on October 16, 2007, Trunkline Gas Company LLC
(Trunkline), P. O. Box 4967, Houston, Texas 77210-4967, filed in Docket
No. CP08-10-000 a prior notice request pursuant to sections 157.205(b),
157.208(c), and 157.212 of the Commission's regulations under the
Natural Gas Act (NGA), and Trunkline's blanket certificate issued in
Docket No. CP83-84-000 on October 1, 1983.\1\ Trunkline seeks
authorization to construct, own, and operate a new receipt point to
receive revaporized liquefied natural (LNG)gas in Beauregard Parish,
Louisiana, all as more fully set forth in the application which is on
file with the Commission and open to public inspection. The filing may
also be viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''

link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 22 FERC ] 62,044 (1983).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, Trunkline proposes design and construct two 24-inch
tap assemblies, valves, overpressure protection equipment, a remote
terminal unit and approximately 400 feet of 24-inch pipe to receive LNG
from Creole Trail LNG, L.P. LNG import terminal by way of the Cheniere
Pipeline facilities.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Creole Trail LNG, L.P., et al., 115 FERC ] 61,331
(2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to
Stephen T. Veatch, Regulatory Affairs, Trunkline Gas Company, LLC, 5444
Westheimer Road, Houston, TX, 77056, or call<PHONE_NUMBER> or (713)989-
7660.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 60 days after the
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and, pursuant to section 157.205 of
the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) (18 CFR
157.205) a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the
time allowed therefore, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be
authorized effective the day after the time allowed for protest. If a
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as
an application for authorization pursuant to section 7 of the NGA.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests, and interventions via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a) (1) (iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site (http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.

    Comment Date: December, 18, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-21162 Filed 10-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49324-49325]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20296]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3418-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2019-0001]

Virgin Islands; Emergency and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of an
emergency for the territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands (FEMA-3418-EM),
dated August 28, 2019, and related determinations.

DATES: The declaration was issued August 28, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and

Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated August 28, 2019, the President issued an emergency declaration
under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5207 (the Stafford Act), as
follows:

    I have determined that the emergency conditions in the territory
of the U.S. Virgin Islands resulting from Hurricane Dorian beginning
on August 26, 2019, and continuing, are of sufficient severity and
magnitude to warrant an emergency declaration under the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C.
5121 et seq. (``the Stafford Act''). Therefore, I declare that such
an emergency exists in the territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands.
    You are authorized to provide appropriate assistance for
required emergency measures, authorized under Title V of the
Stafford Act, to save lives and to protect property and public
health and safety, and to lessen or avert the threat of a
catastrophe in the designated areas. Specifically, you are
authorized to provide assistance for emergency protective measures
(Category B), limited to direct Federal assistance, under the Public
Assistance program.
    Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance be
supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Public Assistance will be limited to 75 percent of the total
eligible costs. In order to provide Federal assistance, you are
hereby authorized to allocate from funds available for these
purposes such amounts as you find necessary for Federal emergency
assistance and administrative expenses.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, Department
of Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Seamus
K. Leary, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating
Officer for this declared emergency.
    The following areas of the territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands
have been designated as adversely affected by this declared emergency:

    All islands in the territory of the U. S. Virgin Islands for
emergency protective measures (Category B), limited to direct
federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2019-20296 Filed 9-18-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 84 (Monday, May 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 20474]
[FR Doc No: E9-10121]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 459-265]

AmerenUE; Notice of Application for Amendment of License and
Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

April 27, 2009.
    a. Type of Application: Non-project use of project lands and
waters.
    b. Project Number: 459-265.
    c. Date Filed: April 3, 2009.
    d. Applicant: AmerenUE.
    e. Name of Project: Osage Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The proposed non-project use is located at mile marker
7.5 of the main channel of Lake of the Ozarks, in Camden County,
Missouri.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Jeff Green, Shoreline Supervisor, Ameren/
UE, P.O. Box 993, Lake Ozark, MO 65049,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Any questions on this notice should be addressed
to Jade Alvey at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    j. Deadline for filing comments and or motions: May 27, 2009.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
interveners filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person whose name appears on the official service
list for the project. Further, if an intervener files comments or
documents with the Commission relating to the merits of an issue that
may affect the responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they
must also serve a copy of the document on that resource agency. A copy
of any motion to intervene must also be served upon each representative
of the Applicant specified in the particular application.
    k. Description of Request: Union Electric Company, dba AmerenUE,
filed an application seeking Commission authorization to permit Glacier
Park Investments, LLC to modify existing docks and construct new docks
near mile marker 7.5 of the main channel of Lake of the Ozarks in
Camden County, Missouri. The application is for reconfiguration of 2
existing permitted docks, replacement of 1 un-permitted dock, and
construction of 4 new docks for a total of 83 boat slips. Existing land
use at the proposed activity site consists of commercial development,
including Glacier Park Investments, LLC's Shady Gators restaurant and
bar. No dredging is proposed. This application was filed after
consultation with the appropriate agencies.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field (P-459) to access the document. You
may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-
208-3372 or e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call (202) 502-
8659. A copy is also available for inspection and reproduction at the
address in item (h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions To Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Any filings must bear in all capital letters the title
``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable,
and the Project Number of the particular application to which the
filing refers.
    p. Agency Comments: Federal, State, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.
    q. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov
under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-10121 Filed 5-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P