[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1267-1269]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00761]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent of Waiver With Respect to Land; Cuyahoga County
Airport, Richmond Heights, Ohio

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is considering a proposal to change 7.6 acres of
airport land from aeronautical use to non-aeronautical use and to
authorize the lease of airport property located at Cuyahoga County
Airport, Richmond Heights, Ohio. The aforementioned land is not needed
for aeronautical use.
    The parcels for release are located in the northwest corner of the
airport property, east of Richmond Road and north of Swetland Parkway.
The property is currently designated as aeronautical use with an
existing office building and parking lot. The proposed non-aeronautical
use of the property is for the existing development.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 4, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review by appointment at the FAA
Detroit Airports District Office, Evonne M. McBurrows, Program Manager,
11677 South Wayne Road, Suite 107, Romulus, Michigan 48174, Telephone:
(734) 229-2945, Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER> and Cuyahoga County, Department of
Public Works, 2079 East Ninth, Cleveland, Ohio 44115.
    Written comments on the Sponsor's request must be delivered or
mailed to: Evonne M. McBurrows, Program Manager, Federal Aviation
Administration, Detroit Airports District Office, 11677 South Wayne
Road, Suite 107, Romulus, Michigan 48174, Telephone Number: (734) 229-
2945/FAX Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evonne M. McBurrows, Program Manager,
Federal Aviation Administration, Detroit Airports District Office,
11677 South Wayne Road, Suite 107, Romulus, Michigan 48174, Telephone
Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>/FAX Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with section 47107(h) of Title
49, United States Code, this notice is required to be published in the
Federal Register 30 days before modifying the land-use assurance that
requires the property to be used for an aeronautical purpose.
    The existing property does not have an aeronautical use; it is
currently developed with a parking lot and office building. This land
was acquired with local funds. Cuyahoga County is proposing to keep the
existing development as is for non-aeronautical use. The County will
continue to lease the land and receive fair market value.
    The disposition of proceeds from the lease of the airport property
will be in accordance with FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the
Use of Airport Revenue, published in the Federal Register on February
16, 1999 (64 FR 7696).
    This notice announces that the FAA is considering the release of
the subject airport property at the Cuyahoga County Airport, Richmond
Heights, Ohio from its obligations to be maintained for aeronautical
purposes. Approval does not constitute a commitment by the FAA to
financially assist in the change

in use of the subject airport property nor a determination of
eligibility for grant-in-aid funding from the FAA.

Legal Description for a 5.3476 Acre Parcel Carved Out From the Original
FAA Parcel 53

    Situated in the City of Richmond Heights, County of Cuyahoga, State
of Ohio, known as being a part of Original Euclid Township Tract 13,
also being a part of land conveyed to the Board of County Commissioners
of Cuyahoga County, Ohio by deed recorded on July 28, 1967 as recorded
in Volume 12141, Page 149 of Cuyahoga County Recorder's Records further
bounded and described as follows:
    Commencing at an iron pin in monument box found marking the
intersection of the Northern line of said Tract 13 with the centerline
of Richmond Road, having a 60-foot wide Right-of-Way;
    Thence along the Northern line of said Tract 13, bearing South
89[deg]37'58'' East, a distance of 235.60 feet to a point thereon, the
same being the Northeast corner of land conveyed to Bret Smith and
Deborah Lynn Smith by deed recorded on April 14, 2009 as recorded in
Document No.<PHONE_NUMBER>09 and the TRUE PLACE OF BEGINNING of the parcel
herein described;
    Thence continuing along the Northern line of said Tract 13 and the
Northern line of said land conveyed to the Board of County
Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, bearing South 89[deg]37'58''
East, a distance of 1071.43 feet to a point thereon;
    Thence, bearing South 48[deg]49'44'' West, a distance of 364.22
feet to a point;
    Thence, bearing South 41[deg]10'16'' East, a distance of 2.08 feet
to a point in the Southern line of said land conveyed to the Board of
County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio;
    Thence along the Southern line of said land conveyed to the Board
of County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, bearing South
89[deg]19'08'' West, a distance of 800.23 feet to a point thereon;
    Thence, bearing North 00[deg]20'54'' East, a distance of 257.72
feet to the TRUE PLACE OF BEGINNING, containing 5.3476 acres of land,
more or less but subject to all legal highways and all covenants and
agreements of record.

Legal Description for a 1.8496 Acre Parcel Carved Out From the Original
FAA Parcel 54

    Situated in the City of Richmond Heights, County of Cuyahoga, State
of Ohio, known as being a part of Original Euclid Township Tract 13,
also being a part of land conveyed to the Board of County Commissioners
of Cuyahoga County, Ohio by deed recorded on October 20, 1967 as
recorded in Volume 12167, Page 183 of Cuyahoga County Recorder's
Records further bounded and described as follows:
    Commencing at an iron pin in monument box found marking the
intersection of the Northern line of said Tract 13 with the centerline
of Richmond Road, having a 60-foot wide Right-of-Way;
    Thence along the centerline of said Richmond Road, bearing South
11[deg]13'06'' West, a distance of 267.74 feet to a point thereon, the
same being the Northwest corner of said land conveyed to the Board of
County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio;
    Thence along the Northern line of said land conveyed to the Board
of County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, bearing North
89[deg]19'08'' East, a distance of 286.14 feet to a point thereon, and
the TRUE PLACE OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described;
    Thence continuing along the Northern line of said land conveyed to
the Board of County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, bearing
North 89[deg]19'08'' East, a distance of 800.23 feet to a point
thereon;
    Thence, bearing South 41[deg]10'16'' East, a distance of 136.92
feet to a point;
    Thence, bearing South 48[deg]49'44'' West, a distance of 12.83 feet
to a point in the Southern line of said land conveyed to the Board of
County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio;
    Thence along the Southern line of said land conveyed to the Board
of County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, bearing South
89[deg]22'34'' West, a distance of 318.54 feet to a point in the
Easterly Right-of-Way line of Swetland Court, having a 60-foot wide
Right-of-Way as shown by the Dedication Plat as recorded in Map Volume
255, Page 8 of Cuyahoga County Recorder's Records;
    Thence along the Easterly Right-of-Way line of said Swetland Court
along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 95.00 feet, a
tangent length of 21.56 feet, a delta of 25[deg]34'21'', the chord
which bears North 76[deg]49'37'' West for a distance of 42.05 feet,
along said arc for a distance of 42.40 feet to a point of tangency;
    Thence along the Northerly Right-of-Way line of said Swetland
Court, bearing North 89[deg]36'47'' West, a distance of 200.00 feet to
a point of curvature;
    Thence along the Northerly Right-of-Way line of said Swetland Court
along a tangent curve to the right with a radius of 860.00 feet, a
tangent length of 145.24 feet, a delta of 19[deg]10'20'', the chord
which bears North 80[deg]01'37'' West for a distance of 286.43 feet,
along said arc for a distance of 287.77 feet to a point of reverse
curvature;
    Thence along the Northerly Right-of-Way line of said Swetland Court
along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 1076.95 feet, a
tangent length of 20.71 feet, a delta of 02[deg]12'13'', the chord
which bears North 71[deg]32'34'' West for a distance of 41.41 feet,
along said arc for a distance of 41.42 feet to a point thereon;
    Thence, bearing North 00[deg]20'54'' East, a distance of 31.82 feet
to the TRUE PLACE OF BEGINNING, containing 1.8496 acres of land, more
or less but subject to all legal highways and all covenants and
agreements of record.

Legal Description for a 0.4032 Acre Parcel Carved Out From the Original
FAA Parcel 55

    Situated in the City of Richmond Heights, County of Cuyahoga, State
of Ohio, known as being a part of Original Euclid Township Tract 13,
also being a part of land conveyed to the Board of County Commissioners
of Cuyahoga County, Ohio by deed recorded on February 10, 1967 as
recorded in Volume 11894, Page 97 of Cuyahoga County Recorder's Records
further bounded and described as follows:
    Commencing at an iron pin in monument box found marking the
intersection of the Northern line of said Tract 13 with the centerline
of Richmond Road, having a 60-foot wide Right-of-Way;
    Thence along the centerline of said Richmond Road, bearing South
11[deg]13'06'' West, a distance of 381.46 feet to a point thereon, the
same being the Northwest corner of said land conveyed to the Board of
County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio;
    Thence along the Northern line of said land conveyed to the Board
of County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, bearing North
89[deg]22'34'' East, a distance of 870.43 feet to a point thereon, the
same being a point in the Easterly Right-of-Way line of Swetland Court,
having a 60-foot wide Right-of-Way as shown by the Dedication Plat as
recorded in Map Volume 255, Page 8 of Cuyahoga County Recorder's
Records, and the TRUE PLACE OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein
described;
    Thence continuing along the Northern line of said land conveyed to
the Board of County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, bearing
North 89[deg]22'34'' East, a distance of 318.54 feet to a point
thereon;

    Thence, bearing South 48[deg]49'44'' West, a distance of 114.63
feet to a point;
    Thence, bearing North 89[deg]36'47'' West, a distance of 179.96
feet to a point in the Easterly line of Right-of-Way line of said
Swetland Court;
    Thence along the Easterly Right-of-Way line of said Swetland Court
along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 95.00 feet, a
tangent length of 49.64 feet, a delta of 55[deg]10'43'', the chord
which bears North 36[deg]27'04'' West for a distance of 87.99 feet,
along said arc for a distance of 91.49 feet to the TRUE PLACE OF
BEGINNING, containing 0.4032 acres of land, more or less but subject to
all legal highways and all covenants and agreements of record.

    Issued in Romulus, Michigan, on December 20, 2018.
John L. Mayfield, Jr.,
Manager, Detroit Airports District Office, FAA, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. 2019-00761 Filed 1-31-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

03/03/2008 09:49 AM

To

<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Subject

You called last week and we didn't get a chance to talk

Art,

Last Wednesday you called me about the NAM meeting.  I returned your call late in the day, but we still haven't talked.  I would like to hear more about the NAM meeting.  In addition, as I said in my message to you, I wanted to confirm that you are planning to review and clear both the ozone rule and the ozone RIA by March 11 or 12.   I'd still like to have that conversation.  Would you have time to talk today?  Thanks.

Lydia


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60890-60892]
[FR Doc No: 2022-21713]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Part 766

[Docket No.<PHONE_NUMBER>]
RIN 0694-AI91

Export Administration Regulations: Guidance on Penalty
Determinations in the Settlement of Administrative Enforcement Cases
Involving Antiboycott Matters

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this final rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
amends a supplement to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) that
sets forth guidance regarding BIS's penalty determinations in the
settlement of administrative enforcement cases involving violations of
the antiboycott provisions of the EAR. This amendment clarifies and
realigns such guidance with current boycott-related activity and BIS's
priorities and charging practices. BIS also updates the reference to
the statutory authority for the EAR's antiboycott provisions.

DATES: This rule is effective October 7, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathleen Ryan, Director, Office of
Antiboycott Compliance, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S.
Department of Commerce, by email at [email protected] or
[email protected], or by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Supplement No 2 to Part 766--(Guidance on Charging and Penalty
Determinations in Settlement of Administrative Enforcement Cases
Involving Antiboycott Matters) (``Antiboycott Penalty Guidance''), a
supplement added to the EAR in July 2007, describes how BIS's Office of
Antiboycott Compliance (OAC) responds to violations of part 760 of the
EAR (``Restrictive Trade Practices or Boycotts'') and to violations of
related recordkeeping requirements set forth in part 762 of the EAR
(``Recordkeeping'') (together, ``the antiboycott provisions of the
EAR''). Paragraph (d) of the Antiboycott Penalty Guidance specifies how
BIS determines the appropriate sanctions in the settlement of
administrative enforcement cases involving violations of the
antiboycott provisions of the EAR.
    In this final rule, BIS revises paragraph (d)(1)(ii)--Category of
Violations, which categorizes violations by the seriousness of the
alleged violations. Based on administrative antiboycott enforcement
cases pursued in recent years under new statutory authority, the Export
Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801-4852), specifically, Part II
(the Anti-Boycott Act of 2018), and current boycott-related trends and
conditions, it is BIS's view that certain of the violations specified
under Categories A and B in paragraph (d) do not accurately reflect
BIS's current antiboycott enforcement priorities and practices or the
agency's assessment of the seriousness of the alleged violations.
    Accordingly, as detailed below, this rule makes certain revisions
and clarifications to Categories A and B. By making these revisions,
this amendment updates the two categories to better comport with
current boycott-related activity and to better align BIS's penalty
determinations with the agency's view of the seriousness of the alleged
violations. BIS has revised Category A to include only those violations
deemed the most serious; these violations will ordinarily warrant the
maximum penalty available under the Anti-Boycott Act of 2018. BIS has
also revised Category B, reflecting shifting trends in boycott
activity, to include violations that most commonly and currently arise
in commercial transactions in a boycott context; these violations will
be the focus of OAC's antiboycott enforcement and subject to enhanced
penalties to discourage cooperation with boycott-related requirements
and to promote awareness, accountability and deterrence.
    Specifically, consistent with these policy considerations, this
rule moves certain violations from Category B to Category A and moves
other violations from Category A to Category B. It also clarifies the
references to certain violations. This rule does not make any revisions
to Category C.

Section 760.2(a) (Refusals To Do Business)

    Section 760.2(a) (Refusals to do business) of the EAR is a
prohibition that may take one of four forms identified in paragraph
(a)(1). BIS will continue to classify the first of these forms,
refusing to do business, as a Category A violation. However, this rule
moves the second form of this prohibition, knowingly agreeing to refuse
to do business, from Category A to B, and also corrects the inadvertent
omission of the word ``knowingly'' in the former reference at paragraph
(d)(1)(ii)(A)(2) of Supp. No. 2 to part 766. Additionally, this rule
makes clarifying additions to Category B by adding in specific
references to the two other forms that Section 760.2(a)(1) may take,
namely, requiring, or knowingly agreeing to require, any other person
to refuse to do business. These clarifying additions reflect BIS's
longstanding assessment of these two forms of the prohibition as
Category B violations.

Furnishing Information About Associations With Charitable or Fraternal
Organizations Which Support a Boycotted Country--Sec.  760.2(e)

    This rule moves this violation from Category B to A.

Implementing Letters of Credit--Sec.  760.2(f)

    This rule moves this violation from Category A to B.

Furnishing Information About Business Relationships With Boycotted
Countries or Blacklisted Persons--Sec.  760.2(d)

    This rule moves this violation from Category A to B.
    These revisions and clarifications are intended to increase
transparency and add clarity to the administrative enforcement process
with respect to violations of the antiboycott provisions of the EAR
and, in turn, to incentivize compliance and strengthen deterrence.

Corrections

    Additionally, this rule makes a technical amendment to the
introductory paragraph of (b) of Supplement No. 2 to Part 766.
Specifically, it replaces the outdated reference to Section 8 of the
Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, with a reference to the
Export Control Reform Act of 2018, the current statutory authority for
the antiboycott provisions of the EAR.

Export Control Reform Act of 2018

    On August 13, 2018, the President signed into law the John S.
McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, which
included the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA) (50 U.S.C. 4801-
4852). Part II of ECRA contains the Anti-Boycott Act of 2018. ECRA
provides the legal basis for BIS's principal authorities and serves as
the authority under which BIS issues this rule.

Rulemaking Requirements

    1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This final rule has been designated as not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
    2. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined under Executive Order 13132.
    3. Pursuant to section 1762 of the Export Control Reform Act of
2018 (50 U.S.C. 4821), this action is exempt from the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) requirements for notice of proposed
rulemaking, opportunity for public participation, and delay in
effective date.
    4. Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C.
553, or by any other law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., are not applicable.
Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required, and none
has been prepared.
    5. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person may be
required to respond to or be subject to

a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information,
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), unless that collection of information displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number.
This regulation involves a collection currently approved by OMB under
control number 0694-0012, Report of Requests for Restrictive Trade
Practice or Boycott--Single or Multiple Transactions. The collection
carries a burden estimate of 60 to 90 minutes for a manual or
electronic submission for a total burden estimate of 482 hours. BIS
expects the burden hours associated with this collection to not to be
impacted with the publication of this rule.

List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 766

    Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Exports, Law enforcement, Penalties.

    Accordingly, part 766 of the Export Administration Regulations (15
CFR parts 730-774) is amended as follows:

PART 766--ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS

0
1. The authority citation for part 766 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4801-4852; 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p.
783.

0
2. Supplement no. 2 to part 766 is amended by revising paragraph (b)
introductory text and paragraph (d)(1)(ii) to read as follows:

Supplement No. 2 to Part 766--Guidance on Charging and Penalty
Determinations in Settlement of Administrative Enforcement Cases
Involving Antiboycott Matters

* * * * *
    (b) Responding to Violations.
    OAC within BIS investigates possible violations of the Anti-
Boycott Act of 2018, the antiboycott provisions of the EAR, or any
order or authorization related thereto. When BIS has reason to
believe that such a violation has occurred, BIS may issue a warning
letter or initiate an administrative enforcement proceeding. A
violation may also be referred to the Department of Justice for
criminal prosecution.
* * * * *
    (d) How BIS determines what sanctions are appropriate in a
settlement.
    (1) General Factors. BIS looks to the following general factors
in determining what administrative sanctions are appropriate in each
settlement.
    (i) Degree of seriousness. In order to violate the antiboycott
provisions of the EAR, a U.S. person does not need to have actual
``knowledge'' or a reason to know, as that term is defined in Sec.
772.1 of the EAR, of relevant U.S. laws and regulations. Typically,
in cases that do not involve knowing violations, BIS will seek a
settlement for payment of a civil penalty (unless the matter is
resolved with a warning letter). However, in cases involving knowing
violations, conscious disregard of the antiboycott provisions, or
other such serious violations (e.g., furnishing prohibited
information in response to a boycott questionnaire with knowledge
that such furnishing is in violation of the EAR), BIS is more likely
to seek a denial of export privileges or an exclusion from practice,
and/or a greater monetary penalty as BIS considers such violations
particularly egregious.
    (ii) Category of violations. In connection with its activities
described in paragraph (a)(1) of this supplement, BIS recognizes
three categories of violations under the antiboycott provisions of
the EAR. (See Sec.  760.2, Sec.  760.4 and Sec.  760.5 of the EAR
for examples of each type of violation other than recordkeeping).
These categories reflect the relative seriousness of a violation,
with Category A violations typically warranting the most stringent
penalties, including up to the maximum monetary penalty, a denial
order and/or an exclusion order. Through providing these categories
in this penalty guidelines notice, BIS hopes to give parties a
general sense of how it views the seriousness of various violations.
This guidance, however, does not confer any right or impose any
obligation as to what penalties BIS may impose based on its review
of the specific facts of a case.
    (A) The Category A violations and the sections of the EAR that
set forth their elements are:
    (1) Discriminating against U.S. persons on the basis of race,
religion, sex, or national origin--Sec.  760.2(b);
    (2) Refusing to do business--Sec.  760.2(a);
    (3) Furnishing information about race, religion, sex or national
origin of U.S. persons including, but not limited to, providing
information in connection with a boycott questionnaire about the
religion of employees--760.2(c).
    (4) Evading the provisions of part 760--Sec.  760.4; and
    (5) Furnishing information about associations with charitable or
fraternal organizations which support a boycotted country--Sec.
760.2(e).
    (B) The Category B violations and the sections of the EAR that
set forth their elements are:
    (1) Knowingly agreeing to refuse to do business--Sec.  760.2(a);
    (2) Requiring, or knowingly agreeing to require, any other
person to refuse to do business--Sec.  760.2(a);
    (3) Implementing letters of credit--Sec.  760.2(f);
    (4) Furnishing information about business relationships with
boycotted countries or blacklisted persons--Sec.  760.2(d); and
    (5) Making recordkeeping violations--part 762.
    (C) The Category C violation and the section of the EAR that
sets forth its elements is: Failing to report timely receipt of
boycott requests--Sec.  760.5.
* * * * *

Thea D. Rozman Kendler,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022-21713 Filed 10-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 248 (Thursday, December 26, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78272-78275]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30735]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R01-OAR-2008-0117; A-1-FRL-9904-45-Region 1]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Connecticut; Ozone Attainment Demonstration for the Greater Connecticut
Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the
ozone attainment demonstration submitted by Connecticut to meet Clean
Air Act requirements for attaining the 1997 8-hour ozone national
ambient air quality standard. EPA is approving Connecticut's
demonstration of attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone standard as it
relates to the Greater Connecticut 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment
area. EPA is also approving the reasonably available control measures
(RACM) analysis for this same area.

DATES: This rule is effective on January 27, 2014.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R01-OAR-2008-0117. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov. Web site. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Office of Ecosystem
Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you contact the contact listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding legal holidays. Copies of the documents
relevant to this action are also available for public inspection during
normal business hours, by appointment at the State Air Agency: the
Bureau of Air Management, Department of Energy and Environmental
Protection, State Office Building, 79 Elm Street, Hartford, CT 06106-
1630.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard P. Burkhart, Air Quality
Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CAQ), Boston, MA
02114-2023, telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, wherever
``Agency,'' ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. What actions is EPA taking?
II. Response to Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What actions is EPA taking?

    EPA is approving Connecticut's demonstration of attainment of the
1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS or
standard) for the Greater Connecticut moderate ozone nonattainment
area, submitted on February 1, 2008. EPA is also approving the
associated RACM analysis for this same area.
    On May 9, 2013 (78 FR 27161), EPA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) which proposed approval of Connecticut's ozone
attainment demonstrations for the 1997 ozone standard for two different
nonattainment areas: (1) The Greater Connecticut ozone nonattainment
area, and (2) the Connecticut portion of the New York-Northern New
Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT ozone nonattainment area (the New York
City area). The NPR also proposed approval of the RACM analyses for
these areas. Today's action approves the ozone attainment demonstration
and RACM analysis for the Greater Connecticut area only. EPA is not
taking action on the ozone attainment demonstration and the RACM
analysis for the Connecticut portion of the New York City ozone
nonattainment area at this time.
    As stated in the NPR, the EPA is approving Connecticut's 1997 8-
hour ozone attainment demonstration and RACM analysis, for the Greater
Connecticut ozone nonattainment area,

because the basic photochemical grid modeling used by Connecticut in
its SIP submittal meets EPA's guidelines and is acceptable to EPA. As
also noted in the NPR, complete, quality assured and certified ambient
air monitoring data show that the Greater Connecticut area attained the
1997 ozone standard for the 2007-2009 monitoring period (i.e., by the
area's June 15, 2010 attainment date) and show that this area continued
to attain the standard through 2011.\1\ The purpose of the attainment
demonstration is to show how the area will meet the standard by the
attainment date. All the control measures necessary for attainment of
the 1997 8-hour ozone standard have already been adopted, submitted,
approved and implemented.\2\ Based on (1) the state following EPA's
modeling guidance, (2) the air quality data through 2011, (3) the area
attaining the standard by the attainment date, and (4) the implemented
SIP-approved control measures, EPA is approving the Connecticut
attainment demonstration and RACM SIP submissions for the Greater
Connecticut 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Subsequently, final, certified 2012 ozone data, and
preliminary 2013 ozone data, indicate continued attainment of the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for this area. The area, however, remains
designated nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
    \2\ At the time of publication of the NPR, three Connecticut
state SIP revisions had not yet been approved by EPA. All were
subsequently approved. Specifically, Connecticut's December 8, 2006
reasonably available control technology (RACT) SIP submission was
approved on June 27, 2013 (78 FR 38587). The final rulemaking notice
approving Connecticut's VOC content limits for consumer products
(Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies (RCSA) section 22a-174-
40) and Connecticut's restrictions on the manufacture and use of
adhesives and sealants (RCSA section 22a-174-44) was signed by the
Regional Administrator on November 12, 2013. A copy of the signed
notice is available in the docket for today's action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Response to Comments

    As noted above, EPA's May 9, 2013 (78 FR 27161) NPR proposed
approval of the Connecticut attainment demonstration and RACM SIP
submissions for two nonattainment areas. EPA received a comment letter
on our NPR. Most of the comments were solely relevant to the New York
City area ozone attainment demonstration. EPA is not taking action on
the New York City attainment demonstration and RACM analysis at this
time. Consequently, this action does not address comments that pertain
solely to the New York City area. In today's action, EPA is approving
the Greater Connecticut ozone attainment demonstration and RACM
analysis. There was, however, one comment that could be interpreted as
applying to the attainment demonstrations for both areas. That comment
is summarized below with EPA's response for the Greater Connecticut
nonattainment area.
    Comment: The commenter stated that EPA must disapprove the
attainment demonstration, because it fails to include an analysis under
Section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act. The commenter states that EPA must
analyze whether approval of the attainment demonstration for the 1997
ozone NAAQS would interfere with any applicable requirements regarding
the 2008 ozone NAAQS or the 2010 nitrogen dioxide NAAQS. The commenter
specifically requests that EPA evaluate whether approval of this
attainment demonstration, which does not require any additional
emission reductions, foregoes some NOx RACT limits which the
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CTDEEP)
previously proposed, and does not apply an 0.07 lb/mmbtu limit for
coal-fired EGUs, will interfere with attaining the 2008 ozone NAAQS as
expeditiously as practicable.
    Response: EPA interprets this comment to apply to the Greater
Connecticut area and our response solely applies to that area. Section
110(l) states: ``The Administrator shall not approve a revision of a
plan if the revision would interfere with any applicable requirement
concerning attainment and reasonable further progress (as defined in
section 171), or any other applicable requirement of this chapter.''
    The SIP submittal that is the subject of this action does not
contain revisions to any control measures or other regulatory
requirements. It does not add, remove, or revise any regulatory
requirements in the list of Federally-enforceable regulations at 40 CFR
52.370 or 40 CFR 52.385. Rather, this SIP submission is a demonstration
that, with respect to the 1997 ozone NAAQS, regulations and control
measures already approved into Connecticut's SIP will (1) provide for
the implementation of all reasonably available control measures as
expeditiously as practicable, as required by section 172(c)(1) of the
Clean Air Act, and (2) provide for attainment of the 1997 ozone NAAQS
in the Greater Connecticut area by the applicable attainment date (June
15, 2010), as required by sections 172(c)(1) and 182(c)(2)(A). This
particular SIP submission does not (and was not required to) make any
demonstrations regarding the adequacy of the SIP with respect to any
other NAAQS, such as the 2008 ozone NAAQS or the 2010 nitrogen dioxide
NAAQS.
    It is arguable whether section 110(l) applies to this submission,
as this submission is not revising any substantive elements of the SIP,
such as control measures. As noted above, the submission that EPA is
approving does not include any increases in emissions or relaxations of
Federally-enforceable control measures to existing SIP-approved
emissions control regulations in the list of Federally-enforceable
regulations at 40 CFR 52.370 or 40 CFR 52.385, where we would need to
determine if such changes would meet the Section 110(l) requirement.
Rather, EPA is simply revising Sec.  52.377 to reflect EPA's conclusion
that Connecticut has an adequate control strategy for the 1997 ozone
standard with respect to the Greater Connecticut ozone nonattainment
area.
    Specifically, the 1997 8-hour ozone attainment demonstration
submitted by Connecticut includes: (1) A detailed ozone photochemical
grid modeling analysis (including a weight of evidence analysis) that
meets EPA guidance; (2) an analysis of air quality data, which is
supplemented in the NPR by EPA with more up-to-date ozone data; and (3)
a list of measures that will bring the area into attainment. The
purpose of the 1997 8-hour ozone attainment demonstration for the
Greater Connecticut area is to demonstrate how, through enforceable and
approvable emission reductions, that area will meet the standard by the
attainment date (June 15, 2010). All ozone control measures necessary
for attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS have already been
adopted, submitted, approved into the SIP and implemented. Based on (1)
Connecticut following EPA's modeling guidance, (2) the air quality data
through 2011, (3) the area attaining the standard by the attainment
date, and (4) the implemented SIP-approved control measures, EPA is
approving the Connecticut ozone attainment demonstration, including the
RACM analysis, for the Greater Connecticut area.
    Furthermore, the Greater Connecticut area is designated
``marginal'' nonattainment for the 2008 ozone standard. (See 40 CFR
81.307) As a result of its ``marginal'' classification, the area is
required to attain the 2008 ozone standard by December 31, 2015 (77 FR
30167, May 21, 2012) but is not required to submit an attainment
demonstration for the 2008 ozone standard. Approval of this submission
will not interfere with attainment of the 2008 ozone standard, because
it will not

change any control requirements or alter ambient concentrations of
ozone.
    While many of the control measures that CTDEEP has implemented for
attaining the 1997 standard may also assist the Greater Connecticut
area in meeting the 2008 standard, it is possible that the area may
also need additional measures that were not needed to attain the 1997
standard. The fact that Connecticut did not find it necessary to
implement a particular measure in order to attain the 1997 standard
does not mean that Connecticut may not find it necessary to implement
that same (or a similar) measure in the future, to fulfill other
requirements of the Clean Air Act. By the same token, EPA's approval of
Connecticut's attainment demonstration for the 1997 ozone standard
without certain measures does not foreclose either Connecticut or EPA
from finding, at a future date with respect to a distinct future
obligation, that Connecticut needs those (or similar) measures in order
to meet other requirements. See Ky. Resources Council, Inc. v. EPA, 467
F.3d 986, 996 (6th Cir. 2006).
    Connecticut is designated unclassifiable/attainment for the 2010 1-
hour NAAQS for nitrogen dioxide (see 40 CFR 81.307), and therefore has
no requirement to submit an attainment demonstration. However, a
similar analysis illustrates that, assuming section 110(l) applies,
approval of this submission will not interfere with attainment or
maintenance of the nitrogen dioxide NAAQS. Approval of this SIP
submission will not alter any control measures currently in the SIP.
Thus, there is no reason to believe that approval of this SIP
submission will change the ambient concentrations of nitrogen dioxide
that would otherwise occur, or that approval would interfere with
attainment or maintenance of the nitrogen dioxide NAAQS.
    For these reasons, even assuming section 110(l) applies to this
submittal, EPA concludes the submittal will not interfere with
attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS, the 2010 nitrogen dioxide NAAQS, or
any other requirement of the Clean Air Act.

III. Final Action

    EPA is approving Connecticut's demonstration of attainment of the
1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard for the Greater
Connecticut moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area submitted on
February 1, 2008. EPA is also approving the associated RACM analysis
for this same area.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. The approval of an
attainment demonstration and RACM analysis does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law and the CAA. For that
reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because it does not impose any new regulatory requirements on tribes,
impact any existing sources of air pollution on tribal lands, nor
impair the maintenance of ozone national ambient air quality standards
in tribal lands.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by February 24, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: December 10, 2013.
Michael P. Kenyon,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England.

    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart H--Connecticut

0
2. Section 52.377 is amended by adding a new paragraph (n) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.377  Control strategy: Ozone.

* * * * *

    (n) Approval--An attainment demonstration for the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard to satisfy requirements of section 182(c)(2)(A) of the Clean
Air Act, and a Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) analysis to
satisfy requirements of section 172(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act for the
Greater Connecticut ozone nonattainment area, submitted by the
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection on
February 1, 2008.

[FR Doc. 2013-30735 Filed 12-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25069-25070]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08915]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34 94778; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2022-017]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a
Proposed Rule Change To Modify Equity 4, Section 4120 To Add Categories
of Regulatory and Operational Halts, To Reorganize the Remaining Text
of the Rule, and To Make Conforming Changes to Related Rules

April 21, 2022.
    On February 22, 2022, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to modify Equity
4, Section 4120 to add categories of regulatory and operational halts,
to reorganize the remaining text of the rule, and to make conforming
changes to related rules. The proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on March 11, 2022.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94370 (March 7,
2022), 87 FR 14071.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that, within 45 days of
the publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding, or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is April 25, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is extending this 45-day time period. The Commission
finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer period within which
to take action on the proposed rule change so

that it has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change.
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\5\ designates June 9, 2022, as the date by which the Commission
shall either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-
NASDAQ-2022-017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-08915 Filed 4-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: December 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 245)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 68192-68194]
[DOCID:fr23de09-19]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-29060; Directorate Identifier 2007-NE-34-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; International Aero Engines (IAE)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of
comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This supplemental NPRM revises an earlier proposed
airworthiness directive (AD) applicable to IAE V2500-A1, V2527E-A5,
V2527M-A5, V2528-D5, V2530-A5, and V2533-A5 turbofan engines. That
proposed AD would have required a one-time inspection of certain vortex
reducers for cracks, and replacing the reducer and high-pressure (HP)
compressor stage 3-8 drum if the reducer is cracked. That proposed AD
resulted from reports of fractured vortex reducers found at shop
visits. This supplemental NPRM revises the proposed AD to add four
engine models and four additional part numbers of HP compressor stage
3-8 drums to the applicability requirement. This proposed AD results
from the manufacturer's latest service information containing engine
models and drum assembly P/Ns that were not specified in the proposed
AD. We are proposing this AD to inspect for cracks in the vortex
reducer. Cracks in the vortex reducer could result in an uncontained
failure of the HP compressor stage 3-8 drum and subsequent damage to
the airplane.

DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by February 22,
2010.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    You can get the service information identified in this proposed AD
from International Aero Engines, 400 Main St., East Hartford, CT 06108;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Dickert, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send us any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposal. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. 2007-29060; Directorate
Identifier 2007-NE-34-AD'' in the subject line of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD
in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including, if provided, the name of the individual who
sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477-78).

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
the same as the Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

Discussion

    On April 27, 2009, we issued a proposal to amend part 39 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to add an AD applicable to
IAE V2500-A1, V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5, V2528-D5, V2530-A5, and V2533-A5
turbofan engines. The proposed AD published as an NPRM in the Federal
Register on April 30, 2009 (74 FR 19904). That NPRM proposed to require
a one-time fluorescent penetrant inspection of certain vortex reducers
for cracks. This condition, if not corrected, could result in an
uncontained failure of the HP compressor stage 3-8 drum and subsequent
damage to the airplane.
    Since we issued that NPRM, IAE has informed us that IAE Alert
Service Bulletin (ASB) V2500-ENG-72-A0510, Revision 2, dated December
19, 2007, contains additional engine models and HP compressor Stage 3
to 8 drum P/Ns that must be inspected. Because we expanded the
population of affected engines by adding the V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2525-
D5, and V2527-A5 engine models and HP compressor stage 3 to 8 drums, P/
Ns 6A4900, 6A7383, 6A7384, and 6A7385, this supplemental NPRM reopens
the comment period to include the additional engine models and drum P/
Ns.

Comments

    We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this proposed AD. We have considered the comments
received.

Request To Add Additional Part Numbers and Engine Models

    One commenter, IAE, asks us to add to the applicability of the
proposed AD, additional part numbers (P/Ns) for the HP compressor stage
3 to 8 drum, and additional IAE engine models that were not included in
the NPRM.
    The commenter states that we need to make the AD applicable to the
additional P/Ns and engine models to ensure that the proposed AD covers
all affected parts.
    We agree. We have added P/Ns 6A4900, 6A7383, 6A7384, and 6A7385;
and IAE engine models V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2525-D5, V2527-A5 turbofan
engines to the applicability.

Request To Revise Costs of Compliance Section

    One commenter, Air Transport Association, asks us to revise the
Costs of Compliance section to include six engines operated by Delta
Airlines.
    We agree. We have changed the Costs of Compliance section to
include the six engines operated by Delta, and provided an estimated
total cost to the fleet.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed and approved the technical contents of IAE ASB
V2500-ENG-72-0510, Revision 2, dated December 19, 2007, that describes
procedures for inspecting the vortex reducer for cracks.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We evaluated all pertinent information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or develop on other products of this
same type design. We are proposing this AD, which will require a one-
time fluorescent penetrant inspection of certain vortex reducers for
cracks.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect six IAE turbofan
engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1 work-hour per engine to perform the proposed
actions, and that the average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. No parts
are required. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost of the
proposed AD to U.S. operators to be $480.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location
to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:

International Aero Engines: Docket No. FAA-2007-29060; Directorate
Identifier 2007-NE-34-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive
comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) action by February 22,
2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to International Aero Engines (IAE) V2500-
A1, V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2525-D5, V2527-A5, V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5,
V2528-D5, V2530-A5, and V2533-A5 turbofan engines with high-pressure
(HP) compressor stage 3-8 drums, part numbers (P/Ns) 6A4900, 6A5467,
6A6473, 6A7383, 6A7384, 6A7385, and 6A7401, installed. These engines
are installed on, but not limited to, Airbus A319, A320, and A321
series airplanes and Boeing MD-90 airplanes.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from reports of fractured vortex reducers
found at shop visits. We are issuing this AD to inspect for cracks
in the vortex reducer. Cracks in the vortex reducer could result in
an uncontained failure of the HP compressor stage 3-8 drum and
subsequent damage to the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.

One-Time Fluorescent Penetrant Inspection

    (f) Fluorescent penetrant inspect the vortex reducer for cracks
when the HPC stage 3-8 drum has between 3,000 and 13,500 cycles-
since-new (CSN) if all of the following conditions also apply:
    (1) The HPC stage 3-8 drum has ever operated in an engine at the
V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5, V2528-D5, V2530-A5, or V2533-A5 thrust
ratings,
    (2) The vortex reducer had cycles accumulated on it when mated
with the HPC stage 3-8 drum, and
    (3) The HPC stage 3-8 drum had fewer than 3,000 CSN when mated
to the vortex reducer.
    (g) If the vortex reducer is cracked, remove both the vortex
reducer and the HPC stage 3-8 drum from service.
    (h) After the effective date of this AD, do not return to
service any HPC stage 3-8 drum that was removed as specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

    (i) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, has the authority
to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

Related Information

    (j) Contact Kevin Dickert, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA,

Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone (781)
238-7117; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, for more information about this AD.

Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-30508 Filed 12-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 44 (Friday, March 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 12161]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05250]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL15-49-000]

City of Alexandria, Louisiana; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on February 26, 2015, the City of Alexandria,
Louisiana submitted a petition for approval of revenue requirement for
reactive power and voltage control from Generation Sources Service.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on March 20, 2015.

    Dated: February 27, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-05250 Filed 3-5-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 146 (Tuesday, August 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 50149]
[FR Doc No: 2023-16219]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-R05-SFUND-2023-0334; FRL-11151-01-R8]

Administrative Settlement Agreement for Response Action by Bona
Fide Prospective Purchaser, Central City/Clear Creek Superfund Site,
Four Points Funding, LLC, Clear Creek County, Colorado

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed agreement; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, of a prospective administrative settlement
agreement for response action between the United States, the State of
Colorado, and Four Points Funding, LLC, at the Central City/Clear Creek
Superfund Site in Clear Creek County, Colorado (Agreement).

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 31, 2023.

ADDRESSES: The proposed agreement and additional background information
relating to the agreement will be available upon request and will be
posted at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/centralcity. Comments and
requests for an electronic copy of the proposed agreement should be
addressed to Crystal Kotowski-Edmunds, Enforcement Specialist,
Superfund and Emergency Management Division, Environmental Protection
Agency--Region 8, Mail Code 8SEM-PAC, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202, or telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email address:
[email protected] and should reference the Central City/Clear
Creek Superfund Site.
    You may also send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
SFUND-2022-0281 to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amelia Piggott, Assistant Regional
Counsel, Office of Regional Counsel, Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 8, Mail Code 8 ORC-LEC,1595 Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado 80202,
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agreement provides that Purchaser shall
characterize contamination at its Property and, as necessary, address
the contamination.
    In exchange, the United States and the State of Colorado will
provide a covenant not to sue Four Points Funding, LLC for Existing
Contamination, work (including subsurface and surface sampling)
conducted by Four Points Funding, LLC, and certain payments as defined
in the agreement (oversight costs, defined in the agreement as
``response costs.''
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this
document, the Agency will receive written comments relating to the
agreement. The Agency will consider all comments received and may
modify or withdraw its consent to the agreement if comments received
disclose facts or considerations that indicate that the agreement is
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

Ben Bielenberg,
Acting Division Director, Superfund and Emergency Management Division,
Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2023-16219 Filed 7-31-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 100 (Thursday, May 25, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24017-24020]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10281]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-9524; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-049-AD;
Amendment 39-18891; AD 2017-10-17]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014-16-19 for
all Airbus Model A330-200 Freighter, -200, and -300 series airplanes.
AD 2014-16-19 required revision of the maintenance or inspection
program to include certain fuel airworthiness limitations. This new AD
requires revision of the maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to include new fuel airworthiness limitations. This new AD
also removes certain airplanes from the applicability of AD 2014-16-19.
This AD was prompted by the issuance of more restrictive fuel
airworthiness limitations. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective June 29, 2017.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of June 29,
2017.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain other publication listed in this AD as of
September 25, 2014 (79 FR 49449, August 21, 2014).

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax: +33 5 61 93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet: http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2016-9524.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9524; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (telephone: 800-
647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2014-16-19, Amendment 39-17943 (79 FR 49449,
August 21, 2014) (``AD 2014-16-19''). AD 2014-16-19 applied to all
Airbus Model A330-200 Freighter, -200, and -300 series airplanes. The
NPRM published in the Federal Register on January 4, 2017 (82 FR 734).
The NPRM was prompted by the issuance of more restrictive fuel
airworthiness

limitations. The NPRM proposed to require revision of the maintenance
or inspection program, as applicable, to include new fuel airworthiness
limitations. The NPRM also proposed to remove certain airplanes from
the applicability of AD 2014-16-19. We are issuing this AD to prevent
the potential of ignition sources inside fuel tanks, which, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank
explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD
2016-0065, dated April 5, 2016 (referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an
unsafe condition for all Airbus Model A330-200 Freighter series
airplanes, Model A330-200 series airplanes, Model A330-300 series
airplanes; and Model A340-200 series airplanes, Model A340-300 series
airplanes, Model A340-500 series airplanes, and Model A340-600 series
airplanes. The MCAI states:

    Prompted by an accident * * *, the Federal Aviation Authority
(FAA) published Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) 88, and
the Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) published Interim Policy INT/
POL/25/12. A design review was conducted by Airbus to develop Fuel
Airworthiness Limitations (FAL) for Airbus A330 and A340 aeroplanes
in response to these regulations.
    The FAL, which are approved by EASA, are defined and published
in Airbus A330 and A340 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS)
documents known as Part 5. Failure to comply with these instructions
could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the
aeroplane.
    EASA issued AD 2012-0168 [which corresponds with FAA AD 2014-16-
19 for Model A330 airplanes, and FAA AD 2013-26-03, Amendment 39-
17712 (78 FR 79292, December 30, 2013) for Model A340 airplanes] to
require compliance with the FAL as specified in the A330 and A340
ALS Part 5 Revision 00.
    Since that [EASA] AD was issued, Airbus issued Revision 01 of
both ALS Parts 5 for Airbus A330 and A340 to introduce more
restrictive maintenance requirements and/or airworthiness
limitations.
    For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2012-0168, which is superseded, and requires
accomplishment of the actions specified in Airbus A330 ALS Part 5
Revision 01, A340 ALS Part 5 Revision 01, as applicable (hereafter
collectively referred to as `the ALS' in this [EASA] AD).

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9524.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received. The Air Line Pilots
Association, International expressed support for the NPRM.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus has issued Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section
(ALS) Part 5--Fuel Airworthiness Limitations (FAL), Revision 01, dated
October 28, 2015. These airworthiness limitations introduce more
restrictive fuel airworthiness limitations. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 104 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    The actions required by AD 2014-16-19, and retained in this AD,
take about 1 work-hour per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the actions
that are required by AD 2014-16-19 is $85 per product.
    We also estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD on U.S. operators to be $8,840, or $85 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2014-16-19, Amendment 39-17943 (79 FR 49449, August 21, 2014), and
adding the following new AD:

2017-10-17 Airbus: Amendment 39-18891; Docket No. FAA-2016-9524;
Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-049-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective June 29, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2014-16-19, Amendment 39-17943 (79 FR 49449,
August 21, 2014) (``AD 2014-16-19'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1) through (c)(3) of this AD, certificated in any category, with
an original certificate of airworthiness or original export
certificate of airworthiness issued on or before October 28, 2015.
    (1) Airbus Model A330-223F and -243F airplanes.
    (2) Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, and -243 airplanes.
    (3) Airbus Model A330-301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -
342, and -343 airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Time Limits/
Maintenance Checks.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by the issuance of more restrictive fuel
airworthiness limitations. We are issuing this AD to prevent the
potential of ignition sources inside fuel tanks, which, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank
explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Maintenance Program Revision and Airworthiness Limitations
Compliance, With No Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2014-16-19, with no changes.
    (1) Within 3 months after September 25, 2014 (the effective date
of AD 2014-16-19), revise the maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, by incorporating Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations
Section (ALS) Part 5--Fuel Airworthiness Limitations (FAL), dated
November 16, 2011.
    (2) Comply with all applicable instructions and airworthiness
limitations included in Airbus A330 ALS Part 5--FAL, dated November
16, 2011. The initial compliance times for the actions specified in
Airbus A330 ALS Part 5--FAL, dated November 16, 2011, are at the
later of the times specified in paragraphs (g)(2)(i) and (g)(2)(ii)
of this AD, except as required by paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD.
    (i) Within the applicable compliance times specified in Airbus
A330 ALS Part 5--FAL, dated November 16, 2011.
    (ii) Within 3 months after accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.

(h) Retained Exceptions to Compliance Times for Design Changes, With No
Changes

    This paragraph restates the exceptions specified in paragraph
(h) of AD 2014-16-19, with no changes.
    (1) For type design changes specified in ``Sub-part 5-2 Changes
to Type Design,'' of Airbus A330 ALS Part 5--FAL, dated November 16,
2011, the compliance times are defined as ``Embodiment Limits,''
except as defined in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD.
    (2) Where Airbus A330 ALS Part 5--FAL, dated November 16, 2011,
specifies a compliance time based on a calendar date for modifying
the control circuit for the fuel pump of the center fuel tank
(installing ground fault interrupters to the center tank fuel pump
control circuit), the compliance date is September 18, 2016 (48
months after the effective date of AD 2012-16-05, Amendment 39-17152
(77 FR 48425, August 14, 2012)).

(i) Retained No Alternative Actions, Intervals, or Critical Design
Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs), With Added Exception

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD
2014-16-19, with an added exception. Except as required by paragraph
(j) of this AD: After accomplishing the revision required by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections), intervals, or CDCCLs may be used; except as specified
in paragraph (h) of this AD; or unless the actions, intervals, or
CDCCLs are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l)(1) of this
AD.

(j) New Requirement of This AD: Revise the Maintenance or Inspection
Program

    Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD, revise the
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate
Airbus A330 ALS Part 5--FAL, Revision 01, dated October 28, 2015.
The compliance times for accomplishing the initial tasks specified
in Airbus A330 ALS Part 5--FAL, Revision 01, dated October 28, 2015,
are at the times specified in Airbus A330 ALS Part 5--FAL, Revision
01, dated October 28, 2015, or within 3 months after revising the
maintenance or inspection program as required by paragraph (j) of
this AD, whichever occurs later. Accomplishing the revision required
by this paragraph terminates the actions required by paragraph (g)
of this AD.

(k) New Requirement of This AD: No Alternative Actions, Intervals, or
CDCCLs

    After accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (j) of
this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, or
CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, intervals, or CDCCLs are
approved as an AMOC in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.

(l) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (m)(2) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.

(m) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA AD 2016-0065, dated April 5, 2016, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2016-9524.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
June 29, 2017.
    (i) Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part 5--
Fuel Airworthiness Limitations (FAL), Revision 01, dated October 28,
2015.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (4) The following service information was approved for IBR on
September 25, 2014 (79 FR 49449, August 21, 2014).
    (i) Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part 5--
Fuel Airworthiness Limitations (FAL), dated November 16, 2011. The
cover page of this document is undated and identified as Revision
00.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (5) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax: +33 5 61 93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet: http://www.airbus.com.
    (6) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.

    (7) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 8, 2017.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-10281 Filed 5-24-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: December 11, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 239)]
[Notices]
[Page 75422-75424]
[DOCID:fr11de08-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings  1

December 01, 2008.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER05-699-007.
    Applicants: Xcel Energy Services Inc.
    Description: Xcel Energy Services Inc submits Service Agreement 393
between Northern States Power Co et al and City of Sleepy Eye etc.
    Filed Date: 11/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081125-0202.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1195-004.
    Applicants: Silverhill LTD.
    Description: Silverhill Ltd. submits updated tariff sheet with
corrected effective date of 9/18/07 pursuant to FERC 11/20/08 letter
order.
    Filed Date: 11/26/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081128-0105.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-456-018; ER06-1271-013; ER06-954-014; ER06-
880-012; ER07-424-009; EL07-57-005.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits an amendment to their
11/14/08 filing of revisions to Schedule 12-Appendix of their tariff to
incorporate new cost responsibility assignments etc.
    Filed Date: 11/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081201-0096.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 16, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-739-018; ER02-537-020; ER03-983-016; ER06-738-
018; ER07-501-016; ER07-758-013; ER08-649-010.
    Applicants: East Coast Power Linden Holding, LLC; Shady Hills Power
Company, L.L.C.; Fox Energy Company LLC; Cogen Technologies Linden
Venture, L.P.; Birchwood Power Partners, L.P.; Inland Empire Energy
Center, L.L.C.; EFS Parlin Holdings LLC.
    Description: GE Companies Notice of Non-Material Change in Status
(Order No. 652).
    Filed Date: 11/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081128-5009.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, December 19, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-54-008.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc et al submits proposed revisions
to Section I and II of the ISO Tariff pursuant to FERC 10/27/08 order.
    Filed Date: 11/26/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081128-0106.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-110-004.
    Applicants: Starwood Power-Midway, LLC.
    Description: Starwood Power-Midway, LLC submits Notification of
Non-Material Change in Status relating to Starwood's market-based rate
authorization.
    Filed Date: 11/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081126-0126.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 16, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-633-002.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England, Inc.'s Informational Filing with
Proration Results.
    Filed Date: 11/18/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081118-5110.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 9, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1006-002.
    Applicants: Entergy Services, Inc.
    Description: Entergy Mississippi, Inc submits an updated Appendix H
to the Amended and Restated Interconnection and Operating Agreement
between Southaven Power, LLC and EMI.
    Filed Date: 11/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081126-0122.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1317-002.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator C.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits compliance filing in response to the Commission's 9/26/08 order
addressing the CAISO's Generator Interconnection Process Reform.
    Filed Date: 11/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081201-0097.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 16, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1457-002.
    Applicants: PPL Electric Utilities Corporation.

    Description: PPL Electric Utilities Corporation submits substitutes
tariff sheets for Attachment H-8H to the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Open Access Transmission Tariff.
    Filed Date: 11/26/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081128-0107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1485-001.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent System Transmission.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc
submits proposed revisions to its Open Access Transmission and Energy
Markets Tariff in compliance with the Commission's 10/28/08 order re
Foreign Guaranties.
    Filed Date: 11/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081126-0123
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 16, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1486-002.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc
submits revisions to its Open Access Transmission and Energy Markets
Tariff pursuant with the Commission's directives in the 10/28/08 order.
    Filed Date: 11/26/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081128-0108.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-138-001.
    Applicants: FPL Energy Oliver Wind I, LLC.
    Description: FPL Energy Oliver Wind I, LLC submits amended market-
based rate tariff pursuant to Order 697-A, effective date 12/15/08.
    Filed Date: 11/26/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081128-0109.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-206-001
    Applicants: Pasco Cogen, Ltd.
    Description: Pasco Cogen, Ltd submits Substitute Original Sheet 2
and 3 to FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 1, effective 1/1/09.
    Filed Date: 11/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081126-0124.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 16, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-319-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc submits transmittal letter and
amendments to the ISO Financial Assurance Policy for Market
Participants and the ISO Financial Assurance Policy for FTR-Only
Customers and DRP-Only Customers etc.
    Filed Date: 11/20/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081124-0315.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, December 11, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-328-000.
    Applicants: TransCanada Energy Sales Ltd.
    Description: TransCanada Energy Sales Ltd submits its application
for authorization to make wholesale sales of energy and capacity at
negotiated, market-based rates.
    Filed Date: 11/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081126-0135.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 16, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-346-000.
    Applicants: American Electric Power Service Corporat.
    Description: AEP Texas Central Co submits a new and revised sheets
to the 1/11/05 Interconnection Agreement with LCRA Transmission
Services Corporation etc.
    Filed Date: 11/26/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081201-0094.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-349-000.
    Applicants: Portland General Electric Company.
    Description: Portland General Electric Co submits First Revised
Rate Schedule 66, an Intertie Agreement with Bonneville Power
Administration which includes certain amendments to PGE's Rate Schedule
FERC 66.
    Filed Date: 11/26/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081201-0095.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 17, 2008.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES08-30-001.
    Applicants: Entergy Louisiana, LLC.
    Description: Request of Entergy Louisiana, LLC, for Modification of
Order Issued Under Section 204(a).
    Filed Date: 11/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081128-5025.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 8, 2008.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following open access
transmission tariff filings:

    Docket Numbers: OA07-83-001.
    Applicants: Avista Corporation.
    Description: Avista Corporation's Substitute Tariff Sheet for
Attachment C to its OATT.
    Filed Date: 11/26/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081126-5163.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: OA08-23-001; OA08-28-002; OA08-31-002; OA08-40-001;
OA08-45-002.
    Applicants: Idaho Power Company, Deseret Generation & Transmission
Co-op., Portland General Electric Company, NorthWestern Corporation,
PacifiCorp.
    Description: Errata to Order No. 890 Attachment K Joint Compliance
Filing of the Funding Members of the Northern Tier Transmission Group
and on 11/18/08 submitted a request that Second Substitute Original
Sheet 346U to 346V et al. to FERC Electric Tariff be considered in
place of those submitted on 10/29/08, pursuant to Order 890, its Joint
Compliance Filing and under OA08-23 et al.
    Filed Date: 11/13/08; 11/18/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081113-5109; 20081121-0131.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 9, 2008.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in

Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the Web site that
enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is
added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online
service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call (866) 208-
3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-29339 Filed 12-10-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P