UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

Issued by the Department of Transportation on May 2, 2006

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2006-23983

________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Application of NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC. (Northwest) filed 2/15/06 for:

XX	Exemption for two years under 49 U.S.C. 40109 to provide the
following service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail
between Atlanta, Georgia and Caracas, Venezuela, and authority to
integrate this authority with its existing certificate and exemption
authority.  Northwest intends to operate this service under a code-share
arrangement with Delta Air Lines (Delta) by placing its “NW*” code
on flights operated by Delta.

Applicant rep:	Meagan Rosia<PHONE_NUMBER>	DOT Analyst: Tretha Chromey
(202) 366-2367

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX	Granted in part (subject to conditions, see below)

XX	Dismissed in part (request for route integration)

The above action was effective when taken: May 2, 2006 through May 2,
2008, or until 90 days after final Department action on Northwest’s
corresponding application for a certificate of public convenience and
necessity in Docket OST-2006-23982, whichever occurs earlier.

Action taken by:	Paul L. Gretch, Director

			Office of International Aviation

XX The authority granted is based on comity and reciprocity with
Venezuela.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:	XX Holder’s
certificates of public convenience and necessity

XX Standard exemption conditions (attached)

Conditions: The code-share operations conducted under this authorization
are subject to the following conditions:

The code-share operations conducted under this authority must comply
with 14 CFR 257 and with any amendment to the Department’s regulations
concerning code-share arrangements that may be adopted.  Notwithstanding
any provisions in the contract between the carriers, our approval here
is expressly conditioned upon the requirements that the subject foreign
air transportation be sold in the name of the carrier holding out such
service in computer reservation systems and elsewhere; that the carrier
selling such transportation (i.e., the carrier shown on the ticket)
accept responsibility for the entirety of the code-share journey for all
obligations established in its contract of carriage with the passenger;
and that the passenger liability of the operating carrier be unaffected.

The authority granted here is specifically conditioned so that neither
Northwest nor its code-share partner, Delta, shall give any force and
effect to any contractual provisions between themselves that are
contrary to these conditions.

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department's regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the exemption services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted, we denied all requests in the referenced
Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority granted in this
Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

U.S. Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the U.S. carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, including, but not limited to, 49 CFR Part 1544.
To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, the holder shall, before commencing any new service
(including charter flights) to or from a foreign airport, contact its
International Principal Security Inspector (IPSI) to advise the IPSI of
its plans and to find out whether the Transportation Security
Administration has determined that security is adequate to allow such
airport(s) to be served; and

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

05/2004

 Northwest's application here for exemption authority also references a
pending Northwest application for corresponding certificate authority.
See Docket OST-2006-23982.  We will handle its certificate request
separately.

 The carrier’s request for route integration authority has been
superseded by Order 2006-1-1, where the Department awarded the carrier a
blanket route integration certificate.


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62351-62352]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24483]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CD14-1-000]

North Side Canal Company; Notice of Preliminary Determination of
a Qualifying Conduit Hydropower Facility and Soliciting Comments and
Motions To Intervene

    On October 3, 2013, North Side Canal Company, filed a notice of
intent to construct a qualifying conduit hydropower facility, pursuant
to section 30 of the Federal Power Act, as amended by section 4 of the
Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 (HREA). The U Canal Hydro
2 Project would be located along North Side Canal Company's
irrigation system on the U Canal in Jerome County, Idaho.
    Applicant Contact: Alan W. Hansten, Manager, North Side Canal
Company, Ltd., 921 North Lincoln, Jerome, ID 83338, Phone No. (208)
324-2319.
    FERC Contact: Christopher Chaney, Phone No.<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Qualifying Conduit Hydropower Facility Description: The proposed
project would consist of: (1) A proposed 1,500-foot-long, 15-foot-
diameter penstock receiving water from a 1,600-foot-long realigned
section of the U Canal; (2) a proposed 48-foot-wide by 105-foot-long
powerhouse, containing one 4,800-kilowatt generating unit; (3) a
proposed tailrace returning flows to the U Canal; and (4) appurtenant
facilities. The proposed project would have an estimated annual
generating capacity of 16,215 megawatt-hours.
    A qualifying conduit hydropower facility is one that is determined
or deemed to meet all of the criteria shown in the table below.

      Table 1--Criteria for Qualifying Conduit Hydropower Facility
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Satisfies
       Statutory provision                Description            (Y/N)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FPA 30(a)(3)(A), as amended by     The conduit the facility           Y
 HREA.                              uses is a tunnel, canal,
                                    pipeline, aqueduct,
                                    flume, ditch, or similar
                                    manmade water conveyance
                                    that is operated for the
                                    distribution of water
                                    for agricultural,
                                    municipal, or industrial
                                    consumption and not
                                    primarily for the
                                    generation of
                                    electricity.
FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(i), as amended by  The facility is                    Y
 HREA.                              constructed, operated,
                                    or maintained for the
                                    generation of electric
                                    power and uses for such
                                    generation only the
                                    hydroelectric potential
                                    of a non-federally owned
                                    conduit.
FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(ii), as amended    The facility has an                Y
 by HREA.                           installed capacity that
                                    does not exceed 5
                                    megawatts.
FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(iii), as amended   On or before August 9,             Y
 by HREA.                           2013, the facility is
                                    not licensed, or
                                    exempted from the
                                    licensing requirements
                                    of Part I of the FPA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Preliminary Determination: Based upon the above criteria,
Commission staff preliminarily determines that the proposal satisfies
the requirements for a qualifying conduit hydropower facility not
required to be licensed or exempted from licensing.
    Comments and Motions To Intervene: Deadline for filing comments
contesting whether the facility meets the qualifying criteria is 45
days from the issuance date of this notice.
    Deadline for filing motions to intervene is 30 days from the
issuance date of this notice.
    Anyone may submit comments or a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR
385.210 and 385.214. Any motions to intervene must be received on or
before the specified deadline date for the particular proceeding.
    Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: All filings must (1)
bear in all capital letters the ``COMMENTS CONTESTING QUALIFICATION FOR
A CONDUIT HYDROPOWER FACILITY'' or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE,'' as
applicable; (2) state in the heading the name of the applicant and the
project number of the application to which the filing responds; (3)
state the name, address, and telephone number of the person filing; and
(4) otherwise comply with the requirements of sections 385.2001 through
385.2005 of the Commission's regulations.\1\ All comments contesting
Commission staff's preliminary determination that the facility meets
the qualifying criteria must set forth their evidentiary basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 385.2001-2005 (2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
motions to intervene and comments using the Commission's eFiling system
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration,
using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the
end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or
(202) 502-8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper
copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. A copy of all other filings in
reference to this application must be accompanied by proof of service
on all persons listed in the service list prepared by the Commission in
this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.
    Locations of Notice of Intent: Copies of the notice of intent can
be obtained directly from the applicant or such copies can be viewed
and reproduced at the Commission in its Public Reference Room, Room 2A,
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. The filing may also be
viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number (e.g., CD14-1) in the

docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-
free 1-866-208-3676 or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call
(202) 502-8659.

    Dated: October 10, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-24483 Filed 10-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 51975]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18266]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG22-206-000.
    Applicants: AES Energy Storage, LLC.
    Description: AES Energy Storage, LLC submits Notice of Self-
Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status.
    Filed Date: 8/18/22.
    Accession Number: 20220818-5039.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/8/22.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2685-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to WMEC Charter to
Modify Voting Structure to be effective 10/18/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/18/22.
    Accession Number: 20220818-5040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/8/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2686-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original WMPAs, Service
Agreement Nos. Ranging 6558 to 6569; Queue No. AD2-059 to be effective
7/19/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/18/22.
    Accession Number: 20220818-5042.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/8/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2687-000.
    Applicants: Wheelabrator Frackville Energy Company Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Notice of Cancellation to be
effective 8/19/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/18/22.
    Accession Number: 20220818-5052.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/8/22.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 18, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-18266 Filed 8-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 11, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 70065]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24497]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0367; FRL-9952-16-Region 9]

Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Butte County Air
Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a revision to the Butte County Air Quality Management District
(BCAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP).
This revision concerns particulate matter (PM) emissions from open
burning. We are proposing to approve a local rule to regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by November 10, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2016-0367 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to Andrew
Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For
comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be removed or
edited from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA
may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish
to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance
on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, (415) 972
3073<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA. This proposal addresses BCAQMD Rule 300,
``Open Burning, Requirements, Prohibitions and Exemptions.'' In the
Rules and Regulations section of this issue of the Federal Register, we
are approving this local rule in a direct final action without prior
proposal because we believe this SIP revision is not controversial. If
we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in
subsequent action based on this proposed rule.
    We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
information, please see the direct final action.

    Dated: July 21, 2016.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2016-24497 Filed 10-7-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 180 (Friday, September 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 63852]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22137]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Land Use Change From
Aeronautical to Non-Aeronautical Use at Hanscom Field in Bedford, MA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. 47153(d), notice is
being given that the FAA is considering a request from the
Massachusetts Port Authority (MPA) in East Boston, MA, to waive the
surplus property requirements for approximately 7.1 acres of airport
property located at Hanscom Field in Bedford, MA.
    The subject parcel has been identified for commercial development
and MPA will negotiate a long term lease to generate non-aviation
revenue for the airport. As such, MPA is requesting a release to change
the property from aeronautical use to non-aeronautical use. It has been
determined through study and master planning that the subject parcel
will not be needed for future aeronautical purposes. Further, the
parcel of land is separated by a road and not contiguous to the airport
proper. Full and permanent relief of the surplus property requirements
on this parcel will allow the airport to generate long term revenue
through lease of the land. All lease revenue will continue to be
subject to the FAAs revenue-use policy and dedicated to the maintenance
and operation of Hanscom Field.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 17, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov, and follow the instructions on providing comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Interested persons may inspect the request and supporting documents
by contacting the FAA at the address listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jorge E. Panteli, Compliance and
Land Use Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration New England Region
Airports Division, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts,
Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 6, 2016.
Mary T. Walsh,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-22137 Filed 9-15-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: June 3, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 106)]
[Notices]
[Page 31448-31449]
[DOCID:fr03jn10-76]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0248]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Format and Content Requirements for Over-the-Counter
Drug Product Labeling

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed reinstatement of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on the standardized format and
content requirements for the labeling of over-the-counter (OTC) drug
products.

DATES:  Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by August 2, 2010.

ADDRESSES:  Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520),
Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or
sponsor. ``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3)
and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that
members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide
information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day
notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed reinstatement of an existing
collection of information, before submitting the collection to OMB for
approval. To comply with this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of
the proposed collection of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Format and Content Requirements for OTC Drug Product Labeling (OMB
Control Number 0910 0340)--Reinstatement

    In the Federal Register of March 17, 1999 (64 FR 13254), we amended
our

regulations governing requirements for human drug products to establish
standardized format and content requirements for the labeling of all
marketed OTC drug products in part 201 (21 CFR part 201) (the 1999
labeling final rule). The regulations in part 201 require OTC drug
product labeling to include uniform headings and subheadings, presented
in a standardized order, with minimum standards for type size and other
graphical features. Specifically, the 1999 labeling final rule added
new Sec.  201.66 to part 201. Section 201.66 sets content and format
requirements for the Drug Facts portion of labels on OTC drug products.
    The only burden to comply with the regulations in part 201 is a
one-time burden for OTC sunscreen products and new OTC drug products
introduced to the marketplace under new drug applications (NDAs) or
abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs). All OTC drug products except
sunscreens and new OTC products marketed under NDAs or ANDAs are
already required to be in compliance with these labeling regulations.
On June 20, 2000 (65 FR 38191), we published a Federal Register
document that required all OTC drug products marketed under the OTC
monograph system except sunscreen products to comply with the
regulations by May 16, 2005, or sooner (65 FR 38191 at 38193).
Sunscreen products do not have to comply with the regulations until we
lift the stay of the sunscreen final rule that was published in the
Federal Register on May 21, 1999 (64 FR 27666) (the 1999 sunscreen
final rule). In the Federal Register of December 31, 2001 (66 FR
67485), we stayed the 1999 sunscreen final rule indefinitely. In the
Federal Register of September 3, 2004 (69 FR 53801), we delayed the
Sec.  201.66 implementation date for OTC sunscreen products
indefinitely. Because the compliance date has passed for all OTC drug
products except sunscreens and drug products introduced under new NDAs
or ANDAs, we believe that the labeling burden associated with the 1999
labeling final rule applies only to these products. We do not
anticipate receiving any requests for exemptions or deferrals under
Sec.  201.66(e) because we have only received one request in the past 8
years.
    We estimate that there are 4,750 OTC sunscreen drug product stock
keeping units (SKUs) that have not yet complied with the 1999 labeling
final rule. All of these SKUs will need to implement the new labeling
format by the implementation date included in the 1999 sunscreen final
rule when it is published in the Federal Register. We estimate that
these 4,750 SKUs are marketed by 400 manufacturers and that
approximately 2 hours will be spent on each submission (see table 1 of
this document). The number of hours per submission (response) is based
on our estimate in the 1999 labeling final rule (64 FR 13254 at 13276).
If an average of 2 hours is spent preparing, completing, and reviewing
each of the estimated 4,750 sunscreen SKUs, the total number of hours
dedicated to the labeling of sunscreen products would be 9,500 hours
(4,750 SKUs times 2 hours/SKU) (see table 1 of this document).
    Based on estimates provided by the Consumer Healthcare Products
Association, we believe that approximately 500 new OTC drug product
SKUs marketed under NDAs or ANDAs are introduced to the marketplace
each year. We estimate that these SKUs are marketed by 300
manufacturers. We estimate that the preparation of labeling for new
NDAs and ANDAs will require 5 hours to prepare, complete, and review
new labeling prior to submitting the new labeling to us. Based on this
estimate, the annual reporting burden for this type of labeling is
approximately 2,500 hours (see table 1 of this document).
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                 Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            No. of       Annual Frequency per     Total Annual     Hours per
   21 CFR Section        Respondents           Response            Responses        Response      Total Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
201.66(c) and (d)\2\                400                 11.88              4,750            2              9,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
201.66(c) and (d)\3\                300                  1.67                500            5              2,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                                                                12,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FDA estimates that capital costs of 22 to 25 million dollars will result from preparing labeling content and
  format in accordance with Sec.   201.66. There are no operating or maintenance costs associated with this
  collection of information.
\2\ Burden for manufacturers of sunscreen drug product.
\3\ Burden for manufacturers of products marketed under new NDAs or ANDAs.

    Dated: May 27, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-13279 Filed 6-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16005-16006]
[FR Doc No: 2023-05261]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-10768-01-R6]

Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petition for Objection to
State Operating Permit for Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations LLC,
Crossett Paper Operations, Ashley County, Arkansas

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final Order on Petition for objection to Clean Air
Act title V operating permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed
an Order dated February 22, 2023, granting in part and denying in part
two Petitions dated February 19, 2018 and October 30, 2019
(collectively the Petitions) from Crossett Concerned Citizens for
Environmental Justice (the Petitioners). The Petitions requested that
the EPA Administrator object to a Clean Air Act (CAA) title V operating
permit issued by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ) to Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations LLC (Georgia-Pacific) for
its Crossett Paper Operations located in Ashley County, Arkansas.

ADDRESSES: The EPA requests that you contact the individual listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to view copies of the final
Order, the Petition, and other supporting information. Out of an
abundance of caution for members of the public and our staff, the EPA
Region 6 office may be closed to the public to reduce the risk of
transmitting COVID-19. Please call or email the contact listed below if
you need alternative access to the final Order and Petition, which are
available electronically at: https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/title-v-petition-database.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Ehrhart, EPA Region 6 Office,
Air Permits Section,<PHONE_NUMBER>, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA affords EPA a 45-day period to
review and object to, as appropriate, operating permits proposed by
state permitting authorities under title V of the CAA. Section
505(b)(2) of the CAA authorizes any person to petition the EPA
Administrator to object to a title V operating permit within 60 days
after the expiration of the EPA's 45-day review period if the EPA has
not objected on its own initiative. Petitions must be based only on
objections to the permit that were raised with reasonable specificity
during the public comment period provided by the State, unless the
petitioner demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise these issues
during the comment period or unless the grounds for the issue arose
after this period.
    The EPA received two petitions from Crossett Concerned Citizens for
Environmental Justice dated February 19, 2018 and October 30, 2019
(collectively the Petitions), requesting that the EPA Administrator
object to the issuance of operating permit No. 0597-AOP-R19, issued by
ADEQ to the Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC for its Crossett
Paper Operations located in Ashley County, Arkansas. The Petitions
claim that the ADEQ unlawfully circumvented the public's right to a
full 60-day petition period, that ADEQ's permit does not comply with
the CAA's substantive requirements, and that the permit fails to
incorporate a compliance schedule as the CAA requires.
    On February 22, 2023, the EPA Administrator issued an Order
granting in part and denying in part the Petitions. The Order explains
the basis for EPA's decision.
    Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that a petitioner
may request judicial review of those portions of an order that deny
issues in a petition. Any petition for review shall be filed in the
United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit no later
than May 15, 2023.

    Dated: March 8, 2023.
David Garcia,
Director, Air and Radiation Division, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2023-05261 Filed 3-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


    EO12866_Oil and Gas Proposed CTG Withdrawal 2060-AT76 Proposal_20171206
                                                                      6560-50-P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0216; FRL-xxxx-xx-xxx]
RIN 2060-AT76
Notice of Proposed Withdrawal of the Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed withdrawal; request for comment.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is requesting public comment on a potential withdrawal of the Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry. The final CTG provided recommendations for reducing volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from existing oil and natural gas industry emission sources in ozone nonattainment areas classified as Moderate or higher and states in the Ozone Transport Region (OTR). The CTG relied upon underlying data and conclusions made in the final rule titled "Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources," published in the Federal Register on June 3, 2016 (2016 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)). On June 5, 2017, the EPA announced that it is convening a proceeding for reconsideration of certain provisions of the 2016 NSPS, in which it intends to look broadly at the entire 2016 NSPS. In light of the fact that the EPA is reconsidering the 2016 NSPS and because the recommendations made in the CTG are fundamentally linked to the conclusions in the 2016 NSPS, the EPA believes it is prudent to withdraw the CTG in its entirety. The EPA also believes that the withdrawal will be more efficient for states in revising their state implementation plants (SIPs). The EPA is seeking comment on a potential withdrawal of the CTG.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0216, at: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jonathan Witt, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Fuels and Incineration Group (E143-05), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On October 27, 2016, the EPA published in the Federal Register the "Release of Final Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry." 81 FR 74798. The CTG provided information to state, local, and tribal air agencies to assist them in determining reasonably available control technology (RACT) for VOC emissions from select oil and natural gas industry emission sources. Section 182(b)(2)(A) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that for ozone nonattainment areas classified as Moderate, states must revise their SIPs to include provisions to implement RACT for each category of VOC sources covered by a CTG document issued between November 15, 1990 and the date of attainment. CAA section 182(c) through (e) extends this requirement to states with ozone nonattainment areas classified as Serious, Severe, and Extreme. CAA section 184(b) further extends this requirement to states in the OTR.
Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA requires that a CTG document issued between November 15, 1990, and the date of attainment include the date by which states must submit their SIP revisions. In the final action issuing the CTG, the EPA established a SIP submission deadline of October 27, 2018, for addressing sources covered by the CTG. 81 FR 74799. According to the CTG implementation memo issued on October 20, 2016, "[t]he emissions controls determined by the state to be RACT for sources covered by the Oil and Gas CTG must be implemented as soon as practicable, but in no case later than January 1, 2021." This implementation period includes the two-year period between the publication of the CTG in the Federal Register notice and the SIP submission date of October 27, 2018. Because the October 27, 2018, deadline is not imminent, no state has an impending RACT SIP deadline associated with the CTG.
The CTG relied upon underlying data and conclusions from the 2016 NSPS, as well as the final rule titled "Oil and Natural Gas Sector: New Source Performance Standards and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Reviews," published in the Federal Register on August 16, 2012 (2012 NSPS). 77 FR 49490. The RACT recommendations for VOC emission reductions contained in the final CTG were based on a review of the 2012 NSPS and the 2016 NSPS. 81 FR 74799. In the final CTG, the EPA states, "[s]everal of the technical support documents (TSDs) prepared in support of the NSPS actions for the oil and natural gas industry include data and analyses considered in developing RACT recommendations in this CTG." RACT recommendations for storage vessels, compressors, pneumatic controllers, and equipment leaks from natural gas processing plants were based on the 2012 NSPS TSDs, and RACT recommendations for pneumatic pumps and fugitive emissions from well sites and compressor stations were based on the 2016 NSPS TSDs. It should be noted that facilities throughout the oil and natural gas sector (e.g., well sites, compressor stations, and natural gas processing plants) may contain some sources subject to the 2012 NSPS and other sources subject to the 2016 NSPS. On June 5, 2017, the EPA announced that it is convening a proceeding for reconsideration of certain provisions of the 2016 NSPS, in which it intends to look broadly at the entire 2016 NSPS. 82 FR 25730.
II. Discussion
The EPA is seeking comment on a proposed withdrawal of the CTG. If finalized, the withdrawal would remove the mandatory RACT review requirement for affected sources in ozone nonattainemnt areas classified as Moderate or higher and states in the OTR. The withdrawal would not impact sources otherwise covered by the major source thresholds for RACT review (100 tons per year (tpy) for Moderate areas, 50 tpy for Serious areas, 25 tpy for Severe areas, and 10 tpy for Extreme areas). The EPA notes that during the period that the EPA is considering comments on a potential withdrawal of the CTG, states remain obligated, where applicable, to revise their SIPs to address RACT requirements for oil and gas sources covered by the CTG in ozone nonattainment areas classified as Moderate or higher and the states in the OTR. States may implement any required emissions reductions before the EPA has approved their SIP. The EPA believes that a withdrawal of the CTG will not hinder states from proceeding, where desired or otherwise required, with any intended review of controls for emissions from the oil and natural gas industry. Nothing contained in this request for comment, or potential final withdrawal, would prohibit a state from choosing to implement the recommendations contained in the withdrawn CTG. The CTG merely provides recommendations for air agencies to consider for emissions reductions, and its withdrawal will not preclude states from seeking emissions reductions from sources in the oil and gas industry, if they so choose or are otherwise required to do so. However, the withdrawal of the CTG will relieve air agencies of the requirement to address RACT for non-major sources in this sector (and the associated need to consider the recommendations in the CTG for the time being).
The EPA notes that after it issued the 2016 NSPS, it exercised its discretion to issue the CTG to inform air agencies of  "determinations as to what constitutes RACT for VOC for those oil and natural gas industry emission sources in their particular areas." 81 FR 74799. The EPA emphasized that the information contained in the CTG was "provided only as guidance." Id. The guidance did not "change, or substitute for, requirements specified in applicable sections of the CAA or the EPA's regulations; nor is it a regulation itself."  Id. The RACT recommendations in the CTG posed no "legally binding requirements on any entity." Id. It only provided "recommendations for air agencies to consider in determining RACT."  Id. The CTG noted that the recommendations were based on "data and information currently available to the EPA." Id.
In light of the fact that we are reconsidering the 2016 NSPS and because the recommendations made in the CTG are fundamentally linked to the conclusions in the 2016 NSPS, the EPA believes it is prudent to withdraw the CTG in its entirety. The deadline for incorporating RACT recommendations into SIPs has not yet passed, so states may wish to wait for the final outcome of any action related to the CTG and the EPA's reconsideration of the NSPS before finalizing any additional controls on oil and gas sources covered by the CTG, unless otherwise required by the Clean Air Act's ozone nonattainment provisions. During the time the EPA anticipates taking to complete the reconsideration of the 2016 NSPS, states would not have had to fully implement any new RACT determinations for oil and gas sources. In addition, the EPA believes it is more efficient for states not to be required to revise their SIPs to comply with aspects pertaining to the 2012 NSPS and then potentially have to revise their SIPs again after reconsideration of the 2016 NSPS. Withdrawing the CTG in its entirety will allow a more holistic consideration of control options for these sources (e.g., shared control devices).
For the reasons outlined above, the EPA believes it is prudent to withdraw the CTG in its entirety. The EPA is seeking comment on a potential withdrawal of the CTG.

_______________________
Dated:

_________________________
E. Scott Pruitt,
Administrator.


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25647-25649]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10489]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0424; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-004-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
The Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted
by heat damage and cracks at the pivot joint location of the main
landing gear (MLG) inner cylinder/truck beam. This proposed AD would
require repetitive lubrication of the MLG pivot joints; repetitive
detailed inspections of the outer diameter chrome on the center axles
of the MLG for chicken-wire cracks, corrosion, and chrome plate
distress; repetitive magnetic particle inspections of the outer
diameter chrome on the center axles of the MLG for cracks; and related
investigative and corrective actions if necessary. We are proposing
this AD to detect and correct cracking in the MLG center axle and shock
strut inner cylinder lugs (pivot joint), which could result in fracture
of the MLG pivot joint components and consequent collapse of the MLG.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 15, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.
O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; phone: 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Sutherland, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone: 425-
917-6533; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0424;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-004-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We have received reports of 39 MLG center axles with cracks at the
pivot joint location of the inner cylinder/truck beam. These cracks
were found in areas common to the inner cylinder pivot bushings where
heat damage had occurred. This heat damage and cracks are caused by MLG
truck pitching motion during normal airplane operations. Heat damage or
cracking in the MLG center axle and shock strut inner cylinder lugs
(pivot joint) could result in fracture of the MLG pivot joint
components and consequent collapse of the MLG.

Relevant Service Information

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-32A0082, dated
December 9, 2010, which describes procedures for repetitive lubrication
of the MLG pivot joints; repetitive detailed inspections of the outer
diameter chrome on the center axles of the MLG for chicken-wire cracks,
corrosion, and chrome plate distress; repetitive magnetic particle
inspections of the outer diameter chrome on the center axles of the MLG
for cracks; and related investigative and corrective actions if
necessary.
    The related investigative actions include a detailed inspection of
the inner diameters and flanges of the inner cylinder bushing for
cracks, smearing of material into the lubrication grooves, bushing
distress, and wear limits; a detailed inspection for corrosion of the
inner cylinder lug face; a detailed inspection of the lug bore inner
cylinder for cracks, corrosion, or bronze transfer; a detailed
inspection of the lug bore face for corrosion or cracks; a penetrant
inspection of the lug bore inner cylinder for corrosion; a magnetic
particle inspection of the lug bore inner cylinder and face for cracks;
and a local etch inspection of large parts of the lug bore inner
cylinder for heat damage.
    The corrective actions include repairing the center axle or
replacing it with a new, overhauled, or serviceable axle; and
refinishing the lug bore and faces, and installing new bushings.
    Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-32A0082, dated December 9, 2010,
specifies, for the lubrication, an initial compliance time of within
120 days after the original issue date of that service bulletin, and a
repetitive interval of 50 flight cycles or 25 days, whichever occurs
later. That service bulletin also specifies, for the detailed and
magnetic particle inspections, an initial compliance time between 1,825
days after the issue date of the original Certificate of Airworthiness
or Export Certificate of Airworthiness or since the last MLG overhaul,
or within 1,125 days after the original issue date of this service
bulletin, whichever is later; and 3,750 days after the issue date of
the original Certificate of Airworthiness or Export Certificate of
Airworthiness or since the last MLG overhaul, or within 375 days after
the original issue date of this service bulletin, whichever is later;
depending on the airplane configuration, lubrication schedule, and

inspection status. That service bulletin specifies a repetitive
interval of 3,750 days for the detailed and magnetic particle
inspections.
    We have reviewed Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-32-
0080, dated July 10, 2008; and Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 777-32-0080, Revision 1, dated April 16, 2009. Part 2 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of these service bulletins describe
procedures for a detailed inspection of the outer diameter chrome on
the center axles of the MLG for chicken-wire cracks, corrosion, and
chrome plate distress and a magnetic particle inspection of the outer
diameter chrome on the center axles of the MLG for cracks.
    We have reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin 777-32A0085, dated April
14, 2011. This service bulletin describes procedures for replacing the
MLG left and right center axles with new, overhauled, or serviceable
center axles, or changing the center axles by polishing to the new
configuration; replacing the inner cylinder assemblies with new,
overhauled, or serviceable inner cylinder assemblies; part marking the
MLG components and assemblies; lubricating the pivot joint with new
grease; and updating the maintenance program to do repetitive
lubrication of the MLG pivot joints.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type designs.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 160 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
              Action                    Labor cost        Parts cost      Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lubrication of MLG pivot joints..  4 work-hours x $85               $0  $340 per             $54,400 per
                                    per hour = $340                      lubrication cycle.   lubrication cycle.
                                    per lubrication
                                    cycle.
Detailed and magnetic particle     39 work-hours x $85               0  $3,315 per           $530,400 per
 inspections.                       per hour = $3,315                    inspection cycle.    inspection cycle.
                                    per inspection
                                    cycle.
Inner cylinder lug bore            6 work-hours x $85                0  $510 per inspection  $81,600 per
 inspection.                        per hour = $510                      cycle.               inspection cycle.
                                    per inspection
                                    cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs or
replacements that would be required based on the results of the
proposed inspections. We have no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these repairs or replacements.

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Action                  Labor cost                Parts cost                 Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacing center axle..........  25 work-hours x     $54,030......................  $56,155.
                                  $85 per hour =
                                  $2,125.
Refinishing the lug bore and     12 work-hours x     Up to $3,526.................  Up to $4,546.
 faces, and installing new        $85 per hour =
 bushings.                        $1,020.
Replacing the inner cylinder     46 work-hours x     Up to $254,847...............  Up to $258,757.
 assembly.                        $85 per hour =
                                  $3,910.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2012-0424; Directorate Identifier
2011-NM-004-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by June 15, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200, -200LR, -
300, -300ER, and 777F series airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
32A0082, dated December 9, 2010.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 32, Landing Gear.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by heat damage and cracks at the pivot
joint location of the main landing gear (MLG) cylinder/truck beam.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking in the MLG
center axle and shock strut inner cylinder lugs (pivot joint), which
could result in fracture of the MLG pivot joint components and
consequent collapse of the MLG.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Repetitive Lubrication and Inspections

    At the applicable compliance times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-32A0082, dated
December 9, 2010, except as provided by paragraph (i) of this AD:
Lubricate the MLG pivot joints; do a detailed inspection of the
outer diameter chrome on the center axles of the MLG for chicken-
wire cracks, corrosion, and chrome plate distress; do a magnetic
particle inspection of the outer diameter chrome on the center axles
of the MLG for cracks; and do all applicable related investigative
and corrective actions; in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-32A0082, dated
December 9, 2010. Repeat the lubrication and inspections thereafter
at the applicable interval specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-32A0082, dated
December 9, 2010. Do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight.

(h) Definition

    For the purposes of this AD, chicken-wire cracks are defined as
cracks that occur when stress created in the chrome deposit during
plating is relieved. The cracks are evident in the deposited chrome
when viewed from a perpendicular plane as a pattern similar to
chicken wire. Crack size can vary with plating conditions.

(i) Exception to Service Information

    Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-32A0082, dated December
9, 2010, specifies a compliance time after the original issue date
of that service bulletin, this AD requires compliance within the
specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD.

(j) Optional Actions for Compliance With Paragraph (g) of This AD

    (1) Doing the detailed and magnetic particle inspections in
accordance with Part 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-32-0080, dated July 10, 2008;
or Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-32-0080, Revision
1, dated April 16, 2009; is considered acceptable for compliance
with the inspections of the center axle of the MLG required by
paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (2) Replacing the MLG left and right center axles with new,
overhauled, or serviceable center axles, or changing the center
axles by polishing to the new configuration; replacing the inner
cylinder assembly with new, overhauled, or serviceable inner
cylinder assembly; part marking the MLG components and assemblies;
and lubricating the pivot joint with new grease; and updating the
maintenance program to repetitively lubricate the MLG pivot joints;
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service
Bulletin 777-32A0085, dated April 14, 2011; is considered acceptable
for compliance with lubricating of the MLG pivot joints and
inspecting the center axles of the MLG as required by paragraph (g)
of this AD.

(k) Special Flight Permit

    Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections
21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the airplane
can be modified (if the operator elects to do so), if the flight is
operated as a non-revenue flight.

(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

(m) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact James
Sutherland, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 425-917-
6590; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; phone: 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 20, 2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-10489 Filed 4-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 67160-67162]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28105]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-1025; Airspace Docket No. 18-AEA-7]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of Area Navigation (RNAV) Route T-299, and
Establishment of T-318 and T-360; Eastern United States.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify low altitude RNAV route T-299,
and establish routes T-318 and T-360 in the eastern United States. The
proposal would expand the availability of RNAV routing in support of
transitioning the National Airspace System (NAS) from ground-based to
satellite-based navigation.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 11, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone: 1
(800) 647-5527 or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-
2018-1025; Airspace Docket No. 18-AEA-7 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11C at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace Policy Group,
Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would expand the availability of RNAV in the eastern
United States to improve the

efficiency of the NAS by lessening the dependency on ground-based
navigation.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2018-1025; Airspace Docket No. 18-AEA-7 and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to FAA Docket No. FAA-2018-1025; Airspace Docket No. 18-AEA-7''. The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified comment
closing date will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRM's

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal
Aviation Administration, Room 210, 1701 Columbia Ave, College Park, GA
30337.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018 and effective
September 15, 2018. FAA Order 7400.11C is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this proposed rule. FAA Order 7400.11C
lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service
routes, and reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to amend RNAV route T-299 and establish T-
318 and T-360. The proposed route changes are described below.
    T-299: T-299 currently extends between the UCREK, VA, waypoint
(WP), (located south of Staunton, VA), and the SCAPE, PA, fix (located
east of Chambersburg, PA). The proposed change would extend the route
to the OBEPE, VA, fix (approximately 11 NM southwest of the UCREK WP)
providing connectivity to VOR Federal airway V-290.
    T-318: T-318 is a proposed new route that would extend between the
JARLO, WV, WP and the SHERL, NY, WP. This would provide RNAV routing
from the Charleston, WV, area, eastward to Virginia, then northeastward
to the New York City area.
    T-360: T-360 is a proposed new route that would extend between West
Virginia and the Richmond, VA, area. It would also provide connectivity
to routes T-299 and T-318.
    United States Area Navigation Routes are published in paragraph
6011 of FAA Order 7400.11C, dated August 13, 2018, and effective
September 15, 2018, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
The RNAV routes listed in this document would be subsequently published
in the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this proposed rule,
when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order
7400.11C, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 13,
2018, and effective September 15, 2018, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6011 United States Area Navigation Routes.

* * * * *

T299 OBEPE, VA to SCAPE, PA [Amended]

    OBEPE, VA Fix (Lat. 37[deg]54'23.03'' N, long.
079[deg]13'21.04'' W)
    UCREK, VA WP (Lat. 38[deg]01'33.17'' N, long. 079[deg]02'56.23''
W)
    KAIJE, VA WP (Lat. 38[deg]44'34.79'' N, long. 078[deg]42'48.47''
W)
    BAMMY, WV WP (Lat. 39[deg]24'33.13'' N, long. 078[deg]25'45.64''
W)
    REEES, PA WP (Lat. 39[deg]47'51.75'' N, long. 077[deg]45'56.31''
W)
    SCAPE, PA Fix (Lat. 39[deg]56'41.76'' N, long.
077[deg]32'12.33'' W)

T318 JARLO, WV to SHERL, NY [New]

    JARLO, WV WP (Lat. 38[deg]20'58.85'' N, long. 081[deg]46'11.68''
W)
    MONTS, WV Fix (Lat. 38[deg]12'48.00'' N, long.
081[deg]24'55.89'' W)

    GAULE, WV Fix (Lat. 38[deg]07'09.92'' N, long.
081[deg]10'25.77'' W)
    LAFOR, WV Fix (Lat. 38[deg]04'53.03'' N, long.
081[deg]04'33.56'' W)
    SPACY, WV WP (Lat. 37[deg]58'31.15'' N, long. 080[deg]48'24.34''
W)
    VUTCU, WV Fix (Lat. 37[deg]48'09.19'' N, long.
080[deg]36'12.45'' W)
    TILFO, WV Fix (Lat. 37[deg]43'53.59'' N, long.
080[deg]31'13.46'' W)
    PEEBE, WV Fix (Lat. 37[deg]43'05.10'' N, long.
080[deg]30'16.97'' W)
    CASTE, VA Fix (Lat. 37[deg]32'49.25'' N, long.
080[deg]18'20.31'' W)
    DBRAH, VA WP (Lat. 37[deg]20'34.14'' N, long. 080[deg]04'10.75''
W)
    SPNKS, VA WP (Lat. 37[deg]17'21.31'' N, long. 079[deg]33'17.14''
W)
    KONRD, VA WP (Lat. 37[deg]20'39.83'' N, long. 079[deg]01'33.27''
W)
    MATTO, VA WP (Lat. 37[deg]24'44.36'' N, long. 078[deg]33'03.77''
W)
    STAFD, VA WP (Lat. 37[deg]26'26.91'' N, long. 078[deg]20'50.17''
W)
    CRUMB, VA Fix (Lat. 37[deg]28'09.44'' N, long.
078[deg]08'27.69'' W)
    WAVES, VA WP (Lat. 37[deg]35'13.54'' N, long. 077[deg]26'52.03''
W)
    TAPPA, VA Fix (Lat. 37[deg]58'12.66'' N, long.
076[deg]50'40.62'' W)
    COLIN, VA Fix (Lat. 38[deg]05'59.23'' N, long.
076[deg]39'50.85'' W)
    SHLBK, MD WP (Lat. 38[deg]20'16.21'' N, long. 076[deg]26'10.51''
W)
    QUENS, MD WP (Lat. 38[deg]26'04.59'' N, long. 076[deg]19'10.06''
W)
    PRNCZ, MD WP (Lat. 38[deg]37'38.10'' N, long. 076[deg]05'08.20''
W)
    GARED, MD Fix (Lat. 38[deg]41'40.41'' N, long.
076[deg]01'21.96'' W)
    CHOPS, MD Fix (Lat. 38[deg]45'41.81'' N, long.
075[deg]57'36.18'' W)
    EGGRS, DE WP (Lat. 38[deg]53'30.52'' N, long. 075[deg]30'49.95''
W)
    JILLI, NJ WP (Lat. 39[deg]00'42.22'' N, long. 075[deg]05'46.21''
W)
    WNSTN, NJ WP (Lat. 39[deg]05'43.81'' N, long. 074[deg]48'01.20''
W)
    AVALO, NJ Fix (Lat. 39[deg]16'54.52'' N, long.
074[deg]30'50.75'' W)
    BRIGS, NJ Fix (Lat. 39[deg]31'24.72'' N, long.
074[deg]08'19.67'' W)
    HARBO, NJ Fix (Lat. 39[deg]36'27.04'' N, long.
074[deg]00'26.56'' W)
    DRIFT, NJ Fix (Lat. 39[deg]48'53.56'' N, long.
073[deg]40'49.53'' W)
    MANTA, NJ Fix (Lat. 39[deg]54'07.01'' N, long.
073[deg]32'31.63'' W)
    PLUME, NJ Fix (Lat. 40[deg]07'06.67'' N, long.
073[deg]17'08.03'' W)
    SHERL, NY Fix (Lat. 40[deg]15'20.55'' N, long.
073[deg]07'18.26'' W)

T360 SPACY, WV to WAVES, VA [New]

    SPACY, WV WP (Lat. 37[deg]58'31.15'' N, long. 080[deg]48'24.34''
W)
    FRETT, WV Fix (Lat. 37[deg]57'38.23'' N, long.
080[deg]25'25.03'' W)
    NATTS, WV Fix (Lat. 37[deg]56'47.15'' N, long.
080[deg]04'52.86'' W)
    BOOME, VA Fix (Lat. 37[deg]54'59.80'' N, long.
079[deg]25'46.25'' W)
    OBEPE, VA Fix (Lat. 37[deg]54'23.03'' N, long.
079[deg]13'21.04'' W)
    ROMAN, VA Fix (Lat. 37[deg]48'12.67'' N, long.
078[deg]46'03.24'' W)
    BRAIL, VA Fix (Lat. 37[deg]44'24.08'' N, long.
078[deg]32'52.00'' W)
    ARVON, VA Fix (Lat. 37[deg]41'13.95'' N, long.
078[deg]21'58.75'' W)
    WAVES, VA WP (Lat. 37[deg]35'13.54'' N, long. 077[deg]26'52.03''
W)
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 17, 2018.
Scott M. Rosenbloom,
Acting Manager, Airspace Policy Group.
[FR Doc. 2018-28105 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P