E. When Will the Guidance Be Finalized? The guidance may be finalized through one of two courses of action. The Agency may place this guidance on a separate track of its own and finalize it soon after careful consideration of all comments received under this notice of availability. On the other hand, the Agency may announce the availability of the Final Technical Guidance as part of the Final Methods Innovation Rule (MIR) package. Depending on the extent of comments received, the process may take approximately fifteen months.

F. Request for Comment The Agency developed the `` RCRA Waste Sampling Draft Technical Guidance'' for use by members of both the regulated community and regulating authorities. By making it available for public comment, we hope to encourage involvement in its development by all stakeholders. All portions of the document are open to comment. Your comments will help us improve the guidance and ensure that it is most beneficial to users. Follow the directions for submitting public comments given in section I. B of this proposed rule and notice of availability.

XII. State Authorization Procedures A. Applicability of Federal Rules in Authorized States Under section 3006 of RCRA, EPA may authorize qualified states to administer the RCRA hazardous waste program within the state. Following authorization, the state requirements authorized by EPA apply in lieu of equivalent Federal requirements and become Federally enforceable as requirements of RCRA. EPA maintains independent authority to bring enforcement actions under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003. Authorized states also have independent authority to bring enforcement actions under state law. A state may receive authorization by following the approval process described in 40 CFR part 271. 40 CFR part 271 also describes the overall standards and requirements for authorization. After a state receives initial authorization, new Federal regulatory requirements promulgated under the authority in the RCRA statute which existed prior to the 1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) do not apply in that state until the state adopts and receives authorization for equivalent state requirements. The state must adopt such requirements to maintain authorization. In contrast, under RCRA section 3006( g) (i. e., 42 U. S. C. 6926( g)), new Federal requirements and prohibitions imposed pursuant to HSWA provisions take effect in authorized states at the same time that they take effect in unauthorized states. Although authorized states are still required to VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66270 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules update their hazardous waste programs to remain equivalent to the Federal program, EPA carries out HSWA requirements and prohibitions in authorized states, including the issuance of new permits implementing those requirements, until EPA authorizes the state to do so. Finally, authorized states are required to modify their programs only when EPA promulgates Federal requirements that are more stringent or broader in scope than existing Federal requirements. RCRA section 3009 allows the states to impose standards more stringent than those in the Federal program. See also § 271.1( i). Therefore, authorized states are not required to adopt Federal regulations, both HSWA and non HSWA, that are considered less stringent.

B. Authorization of States for Today's Proposal Today's proposal affects many aspects of the RCRA Program and would be promulgated pursuant to both HSWA and non HSWA statutory authority. Therefore, when promulgated, the Agency will add the rule to Table 1 in § 271.1( j), which identifies Federal regulations that are promulgated pursuant to the statutory authority that was added by HSWA. States may apply for final authorization for the HSWA provisions, as discussed in the following section of this preamble. Today's proposed rule language provides standards that are equivalent to or less stringent than the existing provisions in the Federal regulations which they would amend. Therefore, States would not be required to adopt and seek authorization for this rulemaking. EPA would implement this rulemaking only in those states which are not authorized for the RCRA Program, and will implement provisions promulgated pursuant to HSWA only in those states which have not received authorization for the HSWA provision that would be amended. In authorized States, the changes will not be applicable until and unless the State revises its program to adopt the revisions. (Note: Procedures and deadlines for State program revisions are set forth in § 271.21.) This rule will provide significant benefits to EPA, states, and the regulated community, without compromising human health or environmental protection. Because this rulemaking would not become effective in authorized states until they adopted and are authorized for it, EPA will strongly encourage states to amend their programs and seek authorization for today's proposal, once it becomes final. C. Abbreviated Authorization Procedures EPA considers today's proposal to be a minor rulemaking and is proposing to add it to the list of minor or routine rulemakings in Table 1 to § 271.21. Placement in this table would enable states to use the abbreviated procedures located in § 271.21( h) when they seek authorization for today's proposed changes after they are promulgated. These abbreviated procedures were established in the HWIR media rulemaking (see 63 FR 65927, November 30, 1998). EPA requests comment on this placement in Table 1 to § 271.21.

XIII. Administrative Requirements A. Executive Order 12866 Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), we must determine whether a proposed regulatory action is `` significant, '' and therefore subject to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and the requirements of the Executive Order. The order defines a `` significant regulatory action'' as one that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or state, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlement, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order. OMB determined that this proposed rule is not a `` significant regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive Order 12866 and is therefore not subject to OMB review and the requirements of the Executive Order.

B. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA or the Act), Pub. L. 104– 4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of UMRA, EPA generally must prepare a written statement, including a costbenefit analysis, for proposed rules and final rules with Federal mandates that may result in estimated costs to State, local, and tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. When such a statement is needed, section 205 of the Act generally requires EPA to identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives. Under section 205, EPA must adopt the least costly, most costeffective or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule, unless the Administrator explains in the final rule why that alternative was not adopted. The provisions of section 205 do not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Before EPA establishes regulatory requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect small governments, including tribal governments, it must develop under section 203 of the Act a small government agency plan. The plan must provide for notifying potentially affected small governments, giving them meaningful and timely input in the development of EPA regulatory proposals with significant Federal intergovernmental mandates, and informing, educating, and advising them on compliance with the regulatory requirements. First, this proposed rule does not contain a Federal mandate. The proposed rule imposes no enforceable duty on any State, local or tribal governments. This proposed rule contains no regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This is due to the fact that this rule does not add any new regulatory requirements and States need not adopt its revisions. This rule only revises certain regulatory sections to remove required uses of SW– 846 methods and allow the use of other appropriate methods or to clarify allowed flexibility in method selection for meeting RCRA related monitoring requirements. Under RCRA, regardless of the method used— the one specified in the regulation or the `` other appropriate method''— regulated entities should be demonstrating that the method is appropriate for its intended use. This rule also does not propose new monitoring or information collection requirements. The additional flexibility allowed by this rule should result in improved data quality at reduced cost. Thus, today's proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202, 203 and 205 of UMRA.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as Amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), 5 U. S. C. 601 et seq. The RFA generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66271 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's rule on small entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business that is independently owned and operated and not dominant in its field as defined by Small Business Administration (SBA) regulations under Section 3 of the Small Business Act for SIC; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town, school district or special district with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is any not for profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field. After considering the economic impacts of today's proposed rule on small entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. In determining whether a rule has a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, the impact of concern is any significant adverse economic impact on small entities, since the primary purpose of the regulatory flexibility analyses is to identify and address regulatory alternatives `` which minimize any significant economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities. '' 5 U. S. C. 603 and 604. Thus, an agency may certify that a rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, or otherwise has a positive economic effect on all of the small entities subject to the rule. Today's proposed rule, if finalized, is specifically intended to reduce economic burden for all entities. The proposed action will provide greater flexibility and utility to all effected entities, including small entities, by providing an increase in choices of appropriate analytical methods for RCRA applications. It does not create any new regulatory requirements or require any new reports beyond those now required by the revised regulations. In addition, its revisions need not be adopted by regulated entities. Such entities can continue to use the methods specified in the regulations instead of choosing the option to use appropriate methods from other reliable sources. We have therefore concluded that today's proposed rule will relieve regulatory burden for small entities. We continue to be interested in the potential impacts of the proposed rule on small entities and welcome comments on issues related to such impacts.

D. Environmental Justice (Executive Order 12898)

Executive Order 12898, `` Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations, '' February 11, 1994, requires that regulatory actions be accompanied by an environmental justice analysis. This analysis must look at potentially disproportionate impacts the action may have on minority and/ or low income communities. The Agency has determined that the proposed action does not raise environmental justice concerns. The impact of this proposed rule, if finalized, will be to provide increased flexibility in the choice of appropriate analytical methods for RCRA applications. The Agency is not aware of any disproportionate impacts that such flexibility may have on minority and/ or low income communities.

E. Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (Executive Order 13045)

Executive Order 13045, `` Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies to any rule that: (1) Is determined to be `` economically significant'' as defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency. This proposed rule is not subject to the Executive Order because it is not economically significant as defined in Executive Order 12866. Also, EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that are based on health or safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5– 501 of the Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not establish an environmental standard intended to mitigate health or safety risks. The action discussed in today's proposed rule is intended to provide regulatory relief, and thus is not strictly subject to Executive Order 13045.

F. Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments (Executive Order 13175) Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249) entitled, `` Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure `` meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications. `` Policies that have tribal implications'' are defined in the Executive Order to include regulations that have `` substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian tribes. '' Today's proposed rule does not have tribal implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175. For many of the same reasons described above under unfunded mandates, the requirements of the Executive Order do not apply to this proposed rulemaking. As stated above, this rule does not propose any new regulatory requirements and governments need not adopt it. It does not impose any direct compliance costs on tribal governments. In the spirit of Executive Order 13175, and consistent with EPA policy to promote communications between EPA and tribal governments, EPA specifically solicits additional comment on this proposed rule from tribal officials.

G. Federalism (Executive Order 13132) Executive Order 13132, entitled `` Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure `` meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications. '' `` Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations that have `` substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. '' This proposed rule does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66272 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132. As explained above, today's proposed rule does not impose new requirements on the States and its regulatory changes need not be adopted by the States. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this rule. Because these changes are equivalent to or less stringent than the existing Federal program, states would not be required to adopt and seek authorization for them. In the spirit of Executive Order 13132, and consistent with EPA policy to promote communications between EPA and State and local governments, EPA specifically solicits comment on this proposed rule from State and local officials.

H. National Technology Transfer And Advancement Act of 1995 Section 12( d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (`` NTTAA''), Pub. L. 104– 113, section 12( d) (15 U. S. C. 272 note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e. g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs us to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards. This proposed rule increases flexibility in the use of methods for RCRA related analyses and does not itself identify or require the use of new methods or other technical standards. In fact, this rule, if finalized, may increase the use of available voluntary consensus standards for some RCRA applications, provided that such methods are appropriate for the regulatory application. The only technical standards included in this rule include the proposed replacement of obsolete references to voluntary consensus standards, in this case ASTM Methods D 3278– 78 and D 93– 79 or D 93– 80 for flash point determinations, with references to the most recent versions of those methods, ASTM Methods D 3278– 96 and D 93– 99c, in the SW– 846 methods (Methods 1010 and 1020). The recent versions of the methods are not significantly different from the older versions. EPA welcomes comments on this aspect of the proposed rulemaking. I. Energy Effects (Executive Order 13211) This proposed rule is not a `` significant energy action'' as defined in Executive Order 13211, `` Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Further, we have concluded that this proposed rule is not likely to have any adverse energy effects.

J. Paperwork Reduction Act This action does not impose any new information collection burden. There are no additional reporting, notification, or recordkeeping provisions associated with today's proposed rule. However, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has previously approved the information collection requirements contained in some of the existing regulations being revised by this proposed rule, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U. S. C. 3501 et seq., and has assigned OMB control numbers for those information collection requirements, as follows:

—40 CFR 258.28: OMB control number 2050– 0122 —40 CFR 260.21 and 260.22: OMB control number 2050– 0053 —40 CFR 261.3: OMB control number 2050– 0085 —40 CFR 261.35: OMB control number 2050– 0115 —40 CRF 264.1034, 264.1063, 265.1034, and 265.1063: OMB control number 2050– 0050 —40 CFR 266.100, 266.102, 266.106, 266.112, Appendix IX to part 63, and 270.22: OMB control number 2050– 0073 —40 CFR 270.19: OMB control number 2050– 0009 —40 CFR 270.62: OMB control numbers 2050– 0009 and 2050– 0149 —40 CFR 270.66: OMB control numbers 2050– 0073 and 2050– 0149 —40 CFR 279.10, 279.44, 279.53 and 279.63: OMB control number 2050– 0124 Copies of the ICR document( s) may be obtained from Sandy Farmer, by mail at the Office of Environmental Information, Collection Strategies Division; U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822); 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, by e mail at farmer. sandy@ epa. gov, or by calling (202) 260– 2740. A copy may also be downloaded off the Internet at http:// www. epa. gov/ icr. Include the ICR and/ or OMB number in any correspondence. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.

List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 63 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

40 CFR Part 258 Environmental protection, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Waste treatment and disposal, Water pollution control.

40 CFR Part 260 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

40 CFR Part 261 Environmental protection, Comparable fuels, syngas fuels, Excluded hazardous waste, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

40 CFR Part 264 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous waste, Insurance, Packaging and containers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Surety bonds.

40 CFR Part 265 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous waste, Insurance, Packaging and containers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Surety bonds, Water supply.

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66273 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules 40 CFR Part 266 Environmental protection, Energy, Hazardous waste, Recycling, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

40 CFR Part 270 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business information, Hazardous materials transportation, Hazardous waste, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Water pollution control, Water supply.

40 CFR Part 271 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business information, Hazardous materials transportation, Hazardous waste, Indians lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Water pollution control, Water supply.

40 CFR Part 279 Environmental protection, Petroleum, Recycling, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: October 9, 2002. Christine Todd Whitman, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.

For the reasons set out in the preamble, title 40, Chapter I, of the Code of Federal Regulations EPA proposes to amend as set forth below: PART 63— NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES 1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U. S. C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart EEE— National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Hazardous Waste Combustors 2. Section 63.1208 is amended by revising paragraph (b)( 8) to read as follows:

§ 63.1208 What are the test methods?

* * * * * (b) * * * (8) Feedstream analytical methods. You may use any reliable analytical method to determine feedstream concentrations of metals, chlorine, and other constituents. It is your responsibility to ensure that the sampling and analysis procedures are unbiased, precise, and that the results are representative of the feedstream. * * * * *

PART 258— CRITERIA FOR MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS 3. The authority citation for part 258 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U. S. C. 1345( d) and (e); 42 U. S. C 6902( a), 6907, 6912( a), 6944, 6945( c), and 6949a( c). Subpart C— Operating Criteria 4. Section 258.28 is amended by revising paragraph (c)( 1) to read as follows:

§ 258.28 Liquids restrictions.

* * * * * (c) * * * (1) Liquid waste means any waste material that is determined to contain `` free liquids'' as defined by Method 9095 (Paint Filter Liquids Test), included in `` Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods'' (EPA Publication SW– 846), incorporated by reference in § 260.11. * * * * * 5. Appendix I to part 258 is amended by revising footnote 1 to read as follows:

Appendix I to Part 258— Constituents for Detection Monitoring 1 * * * * * 1 This list contains 47 volatile organics for which potentially applicable analytical procedures provided in `` Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods'' (EPA Publication SW– 846) include Method 8260; and 15 metals for which SW– 846 provides Methods 6010, and 6020, or the 7000 series of methods.

* * * * * 6. Appendix II to part 258 is revised as follows:

Appendix II to Part 258— List of Hazardous Inorganic and Organic Constituents Common name 1 CAS RN 2 Chemical abstracts service index name 3 Acenaphthene ............................................................................. 83– 32– 9 ......... Acenaphthylene, 1,2 dihydro Acenaphthylene .......................................................................... 208– 96– 8 ....... Acenaphthylene Acetone ....................................................................................... 67– 64– 1 ......... 2 Propanone Acetonitrile; Methyl cyanide ........................................................ 75– 05– 8 ......... Acetonitrile Acetophenone ............................................................................. 98– 86– 2 ......... Ethanone, 1 phenyl 2 Acetylaminofluorene; 2– AAF ................................................... 53– 96– 3 ......... Acetamide, N– 9H fluoren 2 yl Acrolein ....................................................................................... 107– 02– 8 ....... 2 Propenal Acrylonitrile ................................................................................. 107– 13– 1 ....... 2 Propenenitrile Aldrin ........................................................................................... 309– 00– 2 ....... 1,4: 5,8 Dimethanonaphthalene, 1,2,3,4,10,10 hexachloro 1,4,4a, 5,8,8a hexahydro (1,4,4a, 5,8,8a) Allyl chloride ................................................................................ 107– 05– 1 ....... 1 Propene, 3 chloro 4 Aminobiphenyl ......................................................................... 92– 67– 1 ......... [1,1 Biphenyl] 4 amine Anthracene .................................................................................. 120– 12– 7 ....... Anthracene Antimony ..................................................................................... (Total) ............ Antimony Arsenic ........................................................................................ (Total) ............ Arsenic Barium ......................................................................................... (Total) ............ Barium Benzene ...................................................................................... 71– 43– 2 ......... Benzene Benzo[ a] anthracene; Benzanthracene ....................................... 56– 55– 3 ......... Benz[ a] anthracene Benzo[ b] fluoranthene .................................................................. 205– 99– 2 ....... Benz[ e] acephenanthrylene Benzo[ k] fluoranthene .................................................................. 207– 08– 9 ....... Benzo[ k] fluoranthene Benzo[ ghi] perylene ..................................................................... 191– 24– 2 ....... Benzo[ ghi] perylene Benzo[ a] pyrene ........................................................................... 50– 32– 8 ......... Benzo[ a] pyrene Benzyl alcohol ............................................................................. 100– 51– 6 ....... Benzenemethanol Beryllium ..................................................................................... (Total) ............ Beryllium alpha BHC .................................................................................. 319– 84– 6 ....... Cyclohexane, 1,2,3,4,5,6 hexachloro,( 1     ,2     ,3    ,4     ,5    ,6    ) beta BHC .................................................................................... 319– 85– 7 ....... Cyclohexane, 1,2,3,4,5,6 hexachloro,( 1     ,2    ,3     ,4    ,5     ,6    ) delta BHC ................................................................................... 319– 86– 8 ....... Cyclohexane, 1,2,3,4,5,6 hexachloro,( 1     ,2     ,3     ,4    ,5     ,6    ) gamma BHC; Lindane ................................................................ 58– 89– 9 ......... Cyclohexane, 1,2,3,4,5,6 hexachloro,( 1     ,2     ,3    ,4     ,5     ,6    ) Bis( 2 chloroethoxy) methane ....................................................... 111– 91– 1 ....... Ethane, 1,1 [ methylenebis (oxy)] bis [2 chloro Bis( 2 chloroethyl) ether; Dichloroethyl ether ............................... 111– 44– 4 ....... Ethane, 1,1 oxybis[ 2 chloro

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66274 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules Common name 1 CAS RN 2 Chemical abstracts service index name 3 Bis( 2 chloro 1 methylethyl) ether; 2,2  Dichlorodiisopropyl ether; DCIP, See note 4. 108– 60– 1 ....... Propane, 2,2 oxybis[ 1 chloro

Bis( 2 ethylhexyl) phthalate ......................................................... 117– 81– 7 ....... 1,2 Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis( 2 ethylhexyl) ester Bromochloromethane; Chlorobromethane .................................. 74– 97– 5 ......... Methane, bromochloro Bromodichloromethane; Dibromochlormethane ......................... 75– 27– 4 ......... Methane, bromodichloro Bromoform; Tribromomethane .................................................... 75– 25– 2 ......... Methane, tribromo 4 Bromophenyl phenyl ether ...................................................... 101– 55– 3 ....... Benzene, 1 bromo 4 phenoxy Butyl benzyl phthalate; Benzyl butyl phthalate ........................... 85– 68– 7 ......... 1,2 Benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl phenylmethyl ester Cadmium ..................................................................................... (Total) ............ Cadmium Carbon disulfide .......................................................................... 75– 15– 0 ......... Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride ................................................................... 56– 23– 5 ......... Methane, tetrachloro Chlordane ................................................................................... 57– 74– 9 ......... 4,7 Methano 1H indene, 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8 octachloro 2,3,3a, 4,7,7a hexahydro p Chloroaniline ............................................................................ 106– 47– 8 ....... Benzenamine, 4 chloro Chlorobenzene ............................................................................ 108– 90– 7 ....... Benzene, chloro Chlorobenzilate ........................................................................... 510– 15– 6 ....... Benzeneacetic acid, 4 chloro ( 4 chlorophenyl) hydroxy, ethyl ester. p Chloro m cresol; 4 Chloro 3 methylphenol ............................. 59– 50– 7 ......... Phenol, 4 chloro 3 methyl Chloroethane; Ethyl chloride ...................................................... 75– 00– 3 ......... Ethane, chloro Chloroform; Trichloromethane .................................................... 67– 66– 3 ......... Methane, trichloro 2 Chloronaphthalene .................................................................. 91– 58– 7 ......... Naphthalene, 2 chloro 2 Chlorophenol ........................................................................... 95– 57– 8 ......... Phenol, 2 chloro 4 Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ...................................................... 7005– 72– 3 ..... Benzene, 1 chloro 4 phenoxy Chloroprene ................................................................................ 126– 99– 8 ....... 1,3 Butadiene, 2 chloro Chromium ................................................................................... (Total) ............ Chromium Chrysene ..................................................................................... 218– 01– 9 ....... Chrysene Cobalt .......................................................................................... (Total) ............ Cobalt Copper ........................................................................................ (Total) ............ Copper m Cresol; 3 Methylphenol ........................................................... 108– 39– 4 ....... Phenol, 3 methyl o Cresol; 2 Methylphenol ............................................................ 95– 48– 7 ......... Phenol, 2 methyl p Cresol; 4 Methylphenol ............................................................ 106– 44– 5 ....... Phenol, 4 methyl Cyanide ....................................................................................... 57– 12– 5 ......... Cyanide 2,4 D; 2,4 Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid ....................................... 94– 75– 7 ......... Acetic acid, (2,4 dichlorophenoxy) 4,4 DDD ..................................................................................... 72– 54– 8 ......... Benzene 1,1 ( 2,2 dichloroethylidene) bis[ 4 chloro 4,4 DDE ..................................................................................... 72– 55– 9 ......... Benzene, 1,1 ( dichloroethenylidene) bis[ 4 chloro 4,4 DDT ..................................................................................... 50– 29– 3 ......... Benzene, 1,1 ( 2,2,2 trichloroethylidene) bis[ 4 chloro Diallate ........................................................................................ 2303– 16– 4 ..... Carbamothioic acid, bis( 1 methylethyl), S (2,3 dichloro 2 propenyl) ester. Dibenz[ a, h] anthracene ................................................................ 53– 70– 3 ......... Dibenz[ a, h] anthracene Dibenzofuran ............................................................................... 132– 64– 9 ....... Dibenzofuran Dibromochloromethane; Chlorodibromomethane ........................ 124– 48– 1 ....... Methane, dibromochloro 1,2 Dibromo 3 chloropropane; .................................................... 96– 12– 8 ......... Propane, DBCP 1,2 dibromo 3 chloro 1,2 Dibromoethane; Ethylene dibromide; EDB .......................... 106– 93– 4 ....... Ethane, 1,2 dibromo Di n butyl phthalate ..................................................................... 84– 74– 2 ......... 1,2 Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dibutyl ester o Dichlorobenzene; 1,2 Dichlorobenzene .................................. 95– 50– 1 ......... Benzene, 1,2 dichloro m Dichlorobenzene; 1,3 Dichlorobenzene ................................. 541– 73– 1 ....... Benzene, 1,3 dichloro p Dichlorobenzene; 1,4 Dichlorobenzene .................................. 106– 46– 7 ....... Benzene, 1,4 dichloro 3,3 Dichlorobenzidine ................................................................ 91– 94– 1 ......... [1,1 Biphenyl] 4,4  diamine, 3,3 dichloro trans 1,4 Dichloro 2 butene ........................................................ 110– 57– 6 ....... 2 Butene, 1,4 dichloro, (E) Dichlorodifluoromethane; CFC 12 .............................................. 75– 71– 8 ......... Methane, dichlorodifluoro 1,1 Dichloroethane; Ethyldidene chloride ................................... 75– 34– 3 ......... Ethane, 1,1 dichloro 1,2 Dichloroethane; Ethylene dichloride ..................................... 107– 06– 2 ....... Ethane, 1,2 dichloro 1,1 Dichloroethylene; 1,1 Dichloroethene; Vinylidene chloride .. 75– 35– 4 ......... Ethene, 1,1 dichloro cis 1,2 Dichloroethylene; cis 1,2 Dichloroethene ....................... 156– 59– 2 ....... Ethene, 1,2 dichloro( Z) trans 1,2 Dichloroethylene; trans 1,2 Dichloroethene ................ 156– 60– 5 ....... Ethene, 1,2 dichloro, (E) 2,4 Dichlorophenol ...................................................................... 120– 83– 2 ....... Phenol, 2,4 dichloro 2,6 Dichlorophenol ...................................................................... 87– 65– 0 ......... Phenol, 2,6 dichloro 1,2 Dichloropropane ................................................................... 78– 87– 5 ......... Propane, 1,2 dichloro 1,3 Dichloropropane; Trimethylene dichloride ............................ 142– 28– 9 ....... Propane, 1,3 dichloro 2,2 Dichloropropane; Isopropylidene chloride ............................ 594– 20– 7 ....... Propane, 2,2 dichloro 1,1 Dichloropropene ................................................................... 563– 58– 6 ....... 1 Propene, 1,1 dichloro cis 1,3 Dichloropropene .............................................................. 10061– 01– 5 ... 1 Propene, 1,3 dichloro, (Z) trans 1,3 Dichloropropene .......................................................... 10061– 02– 6 ... 1 Propene, 1,3 dichloro, (E) Dieldrin ........................................................................................ 60– 57– 1 ......... 2,7: 3,6 Dimethanonaphth [2,3 b] oxirene, 3,4,5,6,9,9 hexachloro 1a, 2,2a, 3,6,6a, 7,7a octahydro, (1a     2 , 2a , 3 , 6 , 6a , 7 ,7a ) Diethyl phthalate ......................................................................... 84– 66– 2 ......... 1,2 Benzenedicarboxylic acid, diethyl ester O, O Diethyl O– 2 pyrazinyl phosphorothioate; Thionazin ........... 297– 97– 2 ....... Phosphorothioic acid, O, O diethyl O pyrazinyl ester. Dimethoate .................................................................................. 60– 51– 5 ......... Phosphorodithioic acid, O, O dimethyl S[ 2( methylamino) 2 oxoethyl] ester p( Dimethylamino) azobenzene ................................................... 60– 11– 7 ......... Benzenamine, N, N dimethyl 4( phenylazo) 7,12 Dimethylbenz[ a] anthracene ................................................ 57– 97– 6 ......... Benz[ a] anthracene, 7,12 dimethyl 3,3 Dimethylbenzidine ............................................................... 119– 93– 7 ....... [1,1 Biphenyl] 4,4 diamine, 3,3 dimethyl alpha, alpha Dimethylphenethylamine ........................................ 122– 09– 8 ....... Benzeneethanamine, a , a dimethyl

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66275 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules Common name 1 CAS RN 2 Chemical abstracts service index name 3 2,4 Dimethylphenol; m Xylenol ................................................... 105– 67– 9 ....... Phenol, 2,4 dimethyl Dimethyl phthalate ...................................................................... 131– 11– 3 ....... 1,2 Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dimethyl ester m Dinitrobenzene ........................................................................ 99– 65– 0 ......... Benzene, 1,3 dinitro 4,6 Dinitro o cresol; 4,6 Dinitro 2 methylphenol ....... 534– 52– 1 ....... Phenol, 2 methyl 4,6 dinitro 2,4 Dinitrophenol ......................................................................... 51– 28– 5 ......... Phenol, 2,4 dinitro 2,4 Dinitrotoluene ........................................................................ 121– 14– 2 ....... Benzene, 1 methyl 2,4 dinitro 2,6 Dinitrotoluene ........................................................................ 606– 20– 2 ....... Benzene, 2 methyl 1,3 dinitro Dinoseb; DNBP; 2 sec Butyl 4,6 dinitrophenol .......................... 88– 85– 7 ......... Phenol, 2( 1 methylpropyl) 4,6 dinitro Di n octyl phthalate ..................................................................... 117– 84– 0 ....... 1,2 Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dioctyl ester Diphenylamine ............................................................................ 122– 39– 4 ....... Benzenamine, N phenyl Disulfoton .................................................................................... 298– 04– 4 ....... Phosphorodithioic acid, O, O diethyl S[ 2 (ethylthio) ethyl] ester Endosulfan I ................................................................................ 959– 98– 8 ....... 6,9 Methano 2,4,3 benzodiox athiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10 hexachloro 1,5,5a, 6,9,9a hexahydro, 3 oxide, Endosulfan II ............................................................................... 33213– 65– 9 ... 6,9 Methano 2,4,3 benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10 hexachloro 1,5,5a, 6,9,9a hexahydro, 3 oxide, (3     , 5a     , 6    , 9    , 9a     ) Endosulfan sulfate ...................................................................... 1031– 07– 8 ..... 6,9 Methano 2,4,3 benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10 hexachloro 1,5,5a, 6,9,9a hexahydro, 3,3 dioxide Endrin .......................................................................................... 72– 20– 8 ......... 2,7: 3,6 Dimethanonaphth[ 2,3 b] oxirene, 3,4,5,6,9,9 hexachloro 1a, 2,2a, 3,6,6a, 7,7a octahydro, (1a     , 2    , 2a    , 3     , 6     , 6a    , 7    , 7a     ) Endrin aldehyde .......................................................................... 7421– 93– 4 ..... 1,2,4 Methe nocyclo penta[ cd] pentalene 5 carboxaldehyde, 2,2a, 3,3,4,7 hexa chlorodecahydro,( 1     , 2    , 2a    , 4    ,4a    ,5    ,6a    ,6b    ,7R*) Ethylbenzene .............................................................................. 100– 41– 4 ....... Benzene, ethyl Ethyl methacrylate ...................................................................... 97– 63– 2 ......... 2 Propenoic acid, 2 methyl, ethyl ester Ethyl methanesulfonate .............................................................. 62– 50– 0 ......... Methanesulfonic acid, ethyl ester Famphur ...................................................................................... 52– 85– 7 ......... Phosphorothioic acid, O[ 4 [( dimethylamino) sulfonyl] pheny l] O O dimethyl ester Fluoranthene ............................................................................... 206– 44– 0 ....... Fluoranthene Fluorene ...................................................................................... 86– 73– 7 ......... 9H– Fluorene Heptachlor ................................................................................... 76– 44– 8 ......... 4,7 Methano 1H indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8 heptachloro 3a, 4,7,7atetrahydro Heptachlor epoxide ..................................................................... 1024– 57– 3 ..... 2,5 Methano 2H indeno[ 1,2 b] oxirene, 2,3,4,5,6,7,7 heptachloro 1a, 1b, 5,5a, 6,6a, hexahydro 1a     ,1b    ,2     ,5     ,5a    ,6    ,6a     ) Hexachlorobenzene .................................................................... 118– 74– 1 ....... Benzene, hexachloro Hexachlorobutadiene .................................................................. 87– 68– 3 ......... 1,3 Butadiene, 1,1,2,3,4,4 hexachloro Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ........................................................ 77– 47– 4 ......... 1,3 Cyclopentadiene, 1,2,3,4,5,5 hexachloro Hexachloroethane ....................................................................... 67– 72– 1 ......... Ethane, hexachloro Hexachloropropene ..................................................................... 1888– 71– 7 ..... 1 Propene, 1,1,2,3,3,3 hexachloro 2 Hexanone; Methyl butyl ketone ............................................... 591– 78– 6 ....... 2 Hexanone Indeno( 1,2,3 cd) pyrene ............................................................... 193– 39– 5 ....... Indeno[ 1,2,3 cd] pyrene Isobutyl alcohol ........................................................................... 78– 83– 1 ......... 1 Propanol, 2 methyl Isodrin ......................................................................................... 465– 73– 6 ....... 1,4,5,8 Dimethanonaphthalene, 1,2,3,4,1 0,10 hexachloro1,4,4a 5,8,8a hexahydro( 1     ,4     ,4a    ,5    ,8    ,8a    ) Isophorone .................................................................................. 78– 59– 1 ......... 2 Cyclohexen 1 one, 3,5,5 trimethyl Isosafrole .................................................................................... 120– 58– 1 ....... 1,3 Benzodioxole, 5( 1 propenyl) Kepone ........................................................................................ 143– 50– 0 ....... 1,3,4 Metheno 2H cyclobuta [cd] pentalen 2 one, 1,1a, 3,3a, 4,5,5,5a, 5b, 6 decachlorooctahydro Lead ............................................................................................ (Total) ............ Lead Mercury ....................................................................................... (Total) ............ Mercury Methacrylonitrile .......................................................................... 126– 98– 7 ....... 2 Propenenitrile, 2 methyl Methapyrilene ............................................................................. 91– 80– 5 ......... 1,2, Ethanediamine, N, N dimethyl N 2 pyridinyl N ( 2 thienylmethyl) Methoxychlor ............................................................................... 72– 43– 5 ......... Benzene, 1,1  (2,2,2, trichloroethylidene) bis [4 methoxy Methyl bromide; Bromomethane ................................................ 74– 83– 9 ......... Methane, bromo Methyl chloride; Chloromethane ................................................. 74– 87– 3 ......... Methane, chloro 3 Methylcholanthrene ................................................................. 56– 49– 5 ......... Benz[ j] aceanthrylene, 1,2 dihydro 3 methyl Methyl ethyl ketone; MEK; 2 Butanone ...................................... 78– 93– 3 ......... 2 Butanone Methyl iodide; Iodomethane ....................................................... 74– 88– 4 ......... Methane, iodo Methyl methacrylate .................................................................... 80– 62– 6 ......... 2 Propenoic acid, 2 methyl, methyl ester Methyl methanesulfonate ............................................................ 66– 27– 3 ......... Methanesulfonic acid, methyl ester 2 Methylnaphthalene .................................................................. 91– 57– 6 ......... Naphthalene, 2 methyl Methyl parathion; Parathion methyl ............................................ 298– 00– 0 ....... Phosphorothioic acid, O, O dimethyl 4 Methyl 2 pentanone; Methyl isobutyl ketone ........................... 108– 10– 1 ....... 2 Pentanone, 4 methyl Methylene bromide; Dibromomethane ....................................... 74– 95– 3 ......... Methane, dibromo Methylene chloride; Dichloromethane ........................................ 75– 09– 2 ......... Methane, dichloro Naphthalene ................................................................................ 91– 20– 3 ......... Naphthalene 1,4 Naphthoquinone ................................................................... 130– 15– 4 ....... 1,4 Naphthalenedione 1 Naphthylamine ......................................................................... 134– 32– 7 ....... 1 Naphthalenamine 2 Naphthylamine ......................................................................... 91– 59– 8 ......... 2 Naphthalenamine Nickel .......................................................................................... (Total) ............ Nickel VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66276 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules Common name 1 CAS RN 2 Chemical abstracts service index name 3 o Nitroaniline; 2 Nitroaniline ....................................................... 88– 74– 4 ......... Benzenamine, 2 nitro m Nitroaniline; 3 Nitroaniline ...................................................... 99– 09– 2 ......... Benzenamine, 3 nitro p Nitroaniline; 4 Nitroaniline ....................................................... 100– 01– 6 ....... Benzenamine, 4 nitro Nitrobenzene ............................................................................... 98– 95– 3 ......... Benzene, nitro o Nitrophenol; 2 Nitrophenol ....................................................... 88– 75– 5 ......... Phenol, 2 nitro p Nitrophenol; 4 Nitrophenol ....................................................... 100– 02– 7 ....... Phenol, 4 nitro N Nitrosodi n butylamine ............................................................ 924– 16– 3 ....... 1 Butanamine, N butyl N nitroso N Nitrosodiethylamine ................................................................. 55– 18– 5 ......... Ethanamine, N ethyl N nitroso N Nitrosodimethylamine .............................................................. 62– 75– 9 ......... Methanamine, N methyl N nitroso N Nitrosodiphenylamine .............................................................. 86– 30– 6 ......... Benzenamine, N nitroso N phenyl N Nitrosodipropylamine; N Nitroso N dipropylamine; Di npropylnitrosamine 621– 64– 7 ....... 1 Propanamine, N nitroso N propyl

N Nitrosomethylethalamine ......................................................... 10595– 95– 6 ... Ethanamine, N methyl N nitroso N Nitrosopiperidine ..................................................................... 100– 75– 4 ....... Piperidine, 1 nitroso N Nitrosopyrrolidine .................................................................... 930– 55– 2 ....... Pyrrolidine, 1 nitroso 5 Nitro o toluidine ....................................................................... 99– 55– 8 ......... Benzenamine, 2 methyl 5 nitro Parathion ..................................................................................... 56– 38– 2 ......... Phosphorothioic acid, O, O diethyl O( 4 nitrophenyl) ester Pentachlorobenzene ................................................................... 608– 93– 5 ....... Benzene, pentachloro Pentachloronitrobenzene ............................................................ 82– 68– 8 ......... Benzene, pentachloronitro Pentachlorophenol ...................................................................... 87– 86– 5 ......... Phenol, pentachloro Phenacetin .................................................................................. 62– 44– 2 ......... Acetamide, N( 4 ethoxyphenyl) Phenanthrene ............................................................................. 85– 01– 8 ......... Phenanthrene Phenol ......................................................................................... 108– 95– 2 ....... Phenol p Phenylenediamine ................................................................... 106– 50– 3 ....... 1,4 Benzenediamine Phorate ....................................................................................... 298– 02– 2 ....... Phosphorodithioic acid, O, O diethyl S[( ethylthio) methyl] ester Polychlorinated biphenyls; PCBs ................................................ See Note 6 .... 1,1 Biphenyl, chloro derivatives Pronamide ................................................................................... 23950– 58– 5 ... Benzamide, 3,5 dichloro N( 1,1 dimethyl 2 propynyl) Propionitrile; Ethyl cyanide ......................................................... 107– 12– 0 ....... Propanenitrile Pyrene ......................................................................................... 129– 00– 0 ....... Pyrene Safrole ......................................................................................... 94– 59– 7 ......... 1,3 Benzodioxole, 15( 2 propenyl) Selenium ..................................................................................... (Total) ............ Selenium Silver ........................................................................................... (Total) ............ Silver Silvex; 2,4,5 TP .......................................................................... 93– 72– 1 ......... Propanoic acid, 12( 2,4,5 trichlorophenoxy) Styrene ........................................................................................ 100– 42– 5 ....... Benzene, ethenyl Sulfide ......................................................................................... 18496– 25– 8 ... Sulfide 2,4,5 T; 2,4,5 Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid ................................ 93– 76– 5 ......... Acetic acid, (2,4,5 trichlorophenoxy) 2,3,7,8 TCDD; 2,3,7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzo p dioxin ................... 1746– 01– 6 ..... Dibenzo[ b, e][ 1,4] dioxin, 2,3,7,8 tetrachloro 1,2,4,5 Tetrachlorobenzene ........................................................ 95– 94– 3 ......... Benzene, 1,2,4,5 tetrachloro 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane ........................................................... 630– 20– 6 ....... Ethane, 1,1,1,2 tetrachloro 1,1,2,2 Tetrachloroethane ........................................................... 79– 34– 5 ......... Ethane, 1,1,2,2 tetrachloro Tetrachloroethylene; Tetrachloroethene; Perchloroethylene ...... 127– 18– 4 ....... Ethene, tetrachloro 2,3,4,6 Tetrachlorophenol ........................................................... 58– 90– 2 ......... Phenol, 2,3,4,6 tetrachloro Thallium ...................................................................................... (Total) ............ Thallium Tin ............................................................................................... (Total) ............ Tin Toluene ....................................................................................... 108– 88– 3 ....... Benzene, methyl o Toluidine .................................................................................. 95– 53– 4 ......... Benzenamine, 2 methyl Toxaphene .................................................................................. See Note 7 .... Toxaphene 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene. .............................................................. 120– 82– 1 ....... Benzene, 1,2,4 trichloro 1,1,1 Trichloroethane; Methylchloroform .................................... 71– 55– 6 ......... Ethane, 1,1,1 trichloro 1,1,2 Trichloroethane .................................................................. 79– 00– 5 ......... Ethane, 1,1,2 trichloro Trichloroethylene; Trichloroethene ............................................. 79– 01– 6 ......... Ethene, trichloro Trichlorofluoromethane; CFC– 11 ............................................... 75– 69– 4 ......... Methane, trichlorofluoro 2,4,5 Trichlorophenol .................................................................. 95– 95– 4 ......... Phenol, 2,4,5 trichloro 2,4,6 Trichlorophenol .................................................................. 88– 06– 2 ......... Phenol, 2,4,6 trichloro 1,2,3 Trichloropropane ................................................................ 96– 18– 4 ......... Propane, 1,2,3 trichloro O, O, O Triethyl phosphorothioate ................................................ 126– 68– 1 ....... Phosphorothioic acid, O, O, O triethyl ester sym Trinitrobenzene ................................................................... 99– 35– 4 ......... Benzene, 1,3,5 trinitro Vanadium .................................................................................... (Total) ............ Vanadium Vinyl acetate ............................................................................... 108– 05– 4 ....... Acetic acid, ethenyl ester Vinyl chloride; Chloroethene ....................................................... 75– 01– 4 ......... Ethene, chloro Xylene (total) ............................................................................... See Note 8 .... Benzene, dimethyl Zinc ............................................................................................. (Total) ............ Zinc 1 Common names are those widely used in government regulations, scientific publications, and commerce; synonyms exist for many chemicals 2 Chemical Abstracts Service registry number. Where `` Total'' is entered, all species in the ground water that contain this element are included. 3 CAS index names are those used in the 9th Cumulative Index. 4 This substance is often called Bis( 2 chloroisopropyl) ether, the name Chemical Abstracts Service applies to its noncommercial isomer, Propane 2,2 oxybis[ 2 chloro( CAS RN 39638– 32– 9). 5 Chlordane: This entry includes alpha chlordane (CAS RN 5103– 71– 9), beta chlordane (CAS RN 5103– 74– 2), gamma chlordane (CAS RN 5566– 34– 7), and constituents of chlordane (CAS RN 57– 74– 9 and CAS RN 12789– 03– 6). 6 Polychlorinated biphenyls (CAS RN 1336– 36– 3); this category contains congener chemicals, including constituents of Aroclor 1016 (CAS RN 12674– 11– 2), Aroclor 1221 (CAS RN 11104– 28– 2), Aroclor 1232 (CAS RN 11141– 16– 5), Aroclor 1242 (CAS RN 53469– 21– 9), Aroclor 1248 (CAS RN 12672– 29– 6), Aroclor 1254 (CAS RN 11097– 69– 1), and Aroclor 1260 (CAS RN 11096– 82– 5). 7 Toxaphene: This entry includes congener chemicals contained in technical toxaphene (CAS RN 8001– 35– 2), i. e., chlorinated camphene.

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66277 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules 8 Xylene (total): This entry includes o xylene (CAS RN 96– 47– 6), m xylene (CAS RN 108– 38– 3), p xylene (CAS RN 106– 42– 3), and unspecified xylenes (dimethylbenzenes) (CAS RN 1330– 20– 7).

PART 260— HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL 7. The authority citation for part 260 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U. S. C. 6905, 6912( a), 6921– 6927, 6930, 6934, 6935, 6937, 6938, 6939, and 6974.

Subpart B— Definitions 8. Section 260.11 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)( 1) and (2) and (a)( 11) to read as follows:

§ 260.11 References. (a) * * * (1) `` ASTM Standard Test Methods for Flash Point of Liquids by Small Scale Closed Cup Apparatus, '' ASTM Standard D 3278– 96, available from American Society for Testing and Materials, at 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428, http:// www. astm. org, or from Global Engineering Documents, 15 Iverness Way East, Englewood, CO 80112, 1– 800– 854– 7179, http:// global. ihs. com. (2) `` ASTM Standard Test Methods for Flash Point by Pensky Martens Closed Cup Tester, '' ASTM Standard D 93– 99c, available from American Society for Testing and Materials, at 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428, http:// www. astm. org, or from Global Engineering Documents, 15 Iverness Way East, Englewood, CO 80112, 1– 800– 854– 7179, http:// global. ihs. com. * * * * * (11) The following methods found in `` Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods, '' EPA Publication SW– 846, Third Edition, as grouped and identified by date (found in bottom right corner of method) and promulgated updated version: Methods 0010, 0020, 0030, and 1320, dated September 1986 and in the Basic Manual; Methods 1311 and 1330, dated July 1992 and in Update I; Method 1312 dated September 1994 and in Update II; Methods 0011, 0023, 0031, 0040, 0050, 0051, 0060, 0061, 3542, and 5041, dated December 1996 and in Update III; Method 9071 dated April 1998 and in Update IIIA; Methods 1010, 1020, 1110, 1310, 9010, 9012, 9040, 9045, 9060, 9070, and 9095, dated [to be determined at publication of final rule] and in Update IIIB. The Third Edition of SW– 846 and Updates I, II, IIA, IIB, III, and IIIB (document number 955– 001– 00000– 1) are available from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402, (202) 512– 1800. Update IIIA is available through EPA's Methods Information Communication Exchange (MICE) Service. MICE can be contacted by phone at (703) 676– 4690. Copies of the Third Edition of SW– 846 and its updates are also available from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 605– 6000 or (800) 553– 6847. The above methods are also available on the Internet at http:// www. epa. gov/ SW– 846/. Copies of the methods incorporated by reference may be inspected at the Library, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC. * * * * *

Subpart C— Rulemaking Petitions 9. Section 260.21 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows:

§ 260.21 Petitions for equivalent testing or analytical methods.

* * * * * (d) If the Administrator amends the regulations to permit use of a new testing method, the method will be incorporated by reference in § 260.11 and added to `` Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods, '' EPA Publication SW– 846, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste, Washington, DC 20460. 10. Section 260.22 is amended by revising paragraph (d)( 1)( i) to read as follows:

§ 260.22 Petitions to amend part 261 to exclude a waste produced at a particular facility.

* * * * * (d) * * * (1) * * * (i) Does not contain the constituent or constituents (as defined in Appendix VII of part 261 of this chapter) that caused the Administrator to list the waste, by using appropriate methods such as those found in `` Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods, '' EPA Publication SW– 846, or other reliable sources; or * * * * *

PART 261— IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 11. The authority citation for part 261 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U. S. C. 6905, 6912( a), 6921, 6922, 6924( y), and 6938.

Subpart A— General 12. Section 261.3 is amended by revising paragraph (a)( 2)( v) introductory text to read as follows:

§ 261.3 Definition of hazardous waste. (a) * * * (2) * * * (v) Rebuttable presumption for used oil. Used oil containing more than 1000 ppm total halogens is presumed to be a hazardous waste because it has been mixed with halogenated hazardous waste listed in subpart D of part 261 of this chapter. Persons may rebut this presumption by demonstrating that the used oil does not contain hazardous waste (for example, by using appropriate methods such as those found in `` Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods, '' EPA Publication SW– 846, or other reliable sources to show that the used oil does not contain significant concentrations of halogenated hazardous constituents listed in appendix VIII of part 261 of this chapter). * * * * *

Subpart C— Characteristics of Hazardous Waste 13. Section 261.21 is amended by revising paragraph (a)( 1) to read as follows:

§ 261.21 Characteristic of ignitability. (a) * * * (1) It is a liquid, other than an aqueous solution containing less than 24 percent alcohol by volume and has flash point less than 60 ° C (140 ° F), as determined by a Pensky Martens Closed Cup Tester, using the test method specified in ASTM Standard D 93– 99c (incorporated by reference, see § 260.11) which is used and referenced by Method 1010 of `` Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods, '' EPA Publication SW– 846 (incorporated by reference, see § 260.11), or a Small Scale Closed Cup Apparatus, using the test method specified in ASTM Standard D 3278– 96 (incorporated by reference, see § 260.11) which is used and referenced by Method 1020 of `` Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods, '' EPA Publication SW– 846 (incorporated by reference, see § 260.11). * * * * *

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66278 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules 14. Section 261.22 is amended by revising paragraph (a)( 2) introductory text to read as follows:

§ 261.22 Characteristic of corrosivity. (a) * * * (2) It is a liquid and corrodes steel (SAE 1020) at a rate greater than 6.35 mm (0.250 inch) per year at a test temperature of 55 ° C (130 ° F) as determined by the test method specified in NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers) Standard TM– 01– 69 as standardized as Method 1110 in `` Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods, '' EPA Publication SW– 846, and as incorporated by reference in § 260.11 of this chapter. * * * * *

Subpart D— Lists of Hazardous Wastes 15. Section 261.35 is amended by revising paragraphs (b)( 2)( iii)( A) and (B) to read as follows:

§ 261.35 Deletion of certain hazardous waste codes following equipment cleaning and replacement.

* * * * * (b) * * * (2) * * * (iii) * * * (A) Rinses must be tested by using appropriate methods such as Method 8290 of `` Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods'' (EPA Publication SW– 846) or appropriate methods from other reliable sources. (B) `` Not detected'' means at or below the lower method calibration limit (MCL) in SW– 846 Method 8290, Table 1. Other appropriate methods from other reliable sources may be used provided that these criteria are met. * * * * * 16. Section 261.38 is amended by revising paragraph (c)( 7) introductory text to read as follows:

§ 261.38 Comparable/ Syngas Fuel Exclusion.

* * * * * (c) * * * (7) Waste analysis plans. The generator of a comparable/ syngas fuel shall develop and follow a written waste analysis plan which describes the procedures for sampling and analysis of the hazardous waste to be excluded. The waste analysis plan should be developed in accordance with appropriate guidance such as found in the applicable sections of the `` Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods'' (EPA Publication SW– 846) or other reliable sources. The plan shall be followed and retained at the facility excluding the waste. * * * * * 17. Appendix III to part 261 is revised to read as follows:

Appendix III to Part 261— Chemical Analysis Test Methods Note: Examples of appropriate analytical procedures to determine whether a sample contains a given toxic constituent are provided in Chapter Two, `` Choosing the Correct Procedure, '' found in `` Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods, '' EPA Publication SW– 846. Prior to final sampling and analysis method selection, the individual should consult the specific section or method described in SW– 846, if used, for additional guidance on which methods should be employed for a specific sample analysis situation.

16. Appendix IX to part 261 is amended in Table 1: a. In the entry for `` Aptus, Inc, Coffeyville, Kansas, '' under the `` Waste description'' column, by revising paragraphs (2), (3), and (4); b. In the entry for `` Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology, Vertac Superfund site, Jacksonville, Arkansas, '' under the `` Waste description'' column, by revising the introductory text of paragraph (1) and by revising paragraph (3)( C); c. In the entry for `` Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Sparrows Point, Maryland, '' under the `` Waste description'' column, by revising the introductory text of paragraph (1); d. In the entry for `` BMW Manufacturing Corporation, Greer, South Carolina, '' under the `` Waste description'' column, by revising the introductory text of paragraph (2); e. In the entry for `` DuraTherm, Incorporated, San Leon, Texas, '' under the `` Waste description'' column, by revising the introductory text of paragraph (3); f. In the entry for `` Eastman Chemical Company, Longview, Texas, '' under the `` Waste description'' column, by revising the introductory text of paragraph (3); g. In the entry for `` Envirite of Pennsylvania (formerly Envirite Corporation), York, Pennsylvania, under the `` Waste description'' column, by revising paragraph (2); h. In the entry for `` Geological Reclamation Operations and Waste Systems, Inc., Morrisville, PA, '' under the `` Waste description'' column by revising the introductory text of paragraph (1); i. In the entry for `` McDonnel Douglas Corporation, Tulsa, Oklahoma, '' under the `` Waste description'' column by revising paragraph (3); j. In the entry for `` Occidental Chemical, Ingleside, Texas, '' under the `` Waste description'' column, by revising the introductory text of paragraph (3); k. In the entry for `` Rhodia, Houston, Texas, '' under the `` Waste description'' column, by revising the introductory text of paragraph (3); l. In the entry for `` Syntex Agribusiness, Springfield, MO, '' under the `` Waste description'' column, by revising paragraphs (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6); m. In the entry for `` Texas Eastman, Longview, Texas, '' under the `` Waste description'' column, by revising paragraph 3; n. In the entry for `` Tyco Printed Circuit Group, Melbourne Division, Melbourne, Florida, '' under the `` Waste description'' column, by revising the introductory text of paragraph 1. The revisions read as follows:

Appendix IX— Wastes Excluded Under §§ 260.20 and 260.22 TABLE 1.— WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON SPECIFIC SOURCES Facility Address Waste description Aptus, Inc. .......................................... Coffeyville, Kansas ............. ***** (1) * * *

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66279 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 1.— WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON SPECIFIC SOURCES— Continued Facility Address Waste description (2) A minimum of four grab samples must be taken from each hopper (or other container) of kiln residue generated during each 24 hour run; all grabs collected during a given 24 hour run must then be composited to form one composite sample. A minimum of four grab samples must also be taken from each hopper (or other container) of spray dryer/ baghouse residue generated during each 24 hour run; all grabs collected during a given 24 hour run must then be composited to form one composite sample. Prior to the disposal of the residues from each 24 hour run, a TCLP leachate test must be performed on these composite samples and the leachate analyzed for the TC toxic metals, nickel, and cyanide. If arsenic, chromium, lead or silver TC leachate test results exceed 1.6 ppm, barium levels exceed 32 ppm, cadmium or selenium levels exceed 0.3 ppm, mercury levels exceed 0.07 ppm, nickel levels exceed 10 ppm, or cyanide levels exceed 6.5 ppm, the wastes must be retreated to achieve these levels or must be disposed in accordance with subtitle C of RCRA. Analyses must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). (3) Aptus must generate, prior to the disposal of the residues, verification data from each 24 hour run for each treatment residue (i. e., kiln residue, spray dryer/ baghouse residue) to demonstrate that the maximum allowable treatment residue concentrations listed below are not exceeded. Samples must be collected as specified in Condition (2). Analyses must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). Any residues which exceed any of the levels listed below must be retreated or must be disposed of as hazardous. Kiln residue and spray dryer/ baghouse residue must not exceed the following levels: Aldrin— 0.015 ppm; Benzene— 9.7 ppm; Benzo( a) pyrene— 0.43 ppm; Benzo( b) fluoranthene— 1.8 ppm; Chlordane— 0.37 ppm; Chloroform— 5.4 ppm; Chrysene— 170 ppm; Dibenz( a, h) anthracene— 0.083 ppm; 1,2 Dichloroethane— 4.1 ppm; Dichloromethane— 2.4 ppm; 2,4 Dichlorophenol— 480 ppm; Dichlorvos— 260 ppm; Disulfaton— 23 ppm; Endosulfan I— 310 ppm; Fluorene— 120 ppm; Indeno( 1,2,3, cd) pyrene— 330 ppm; Methyl parathion— 210 ppm; Nitrosodiphenylamine— 130 ppm; Phenanthrene— 150 ppm; Polychlorinated biphenyls— 0.31 ppm; Tetrachloroethylene— 59 ppm; 2,4,5 TP (silvex)— 110 ppm; 2,4,6 Trichlorophenol— 3.9 ppm. (4) Aptus must generate, prior to disposal of residues, verification data from each 24 hour run for each treatment residue (i. e., kiln residue, spray dryer/ baghouse residue) to demonstrate that the residues do not contain tetra, penta, or hexachlorodibenzo p dioxins or furans at levels of regulatory concern. Samples must be collected as specified in Condition (2). The TCDD equivalent levels for the solid residues must be less than 5 ppt. Any residues with detected dioxins or furans in excess of this level must be retreated or must be disposed of as acutely hazardous For this analysis, Aptus must use appropriate methods such as Method 8290 found in EPA Publication SW– 846, a high resolution gas chromatography and high resolution mass spectroscopy (HRGC/ HRMS) analytical method, or use appropriate methods found in other reliable sources. For tetra and penta chlorinated dioxin and furan homologs, the maximum practical quantitation limit must not exceed 15 ppt for the solid residues. For hexachlorinated dioxin and furan homologs, the maximum practical quantitation limit must not exceed 37 ppt for the solid residues. *****

Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology. Vertac Superfund site, Jacksonville, Arkansas. *****

(1) Testing: Sample collection and analyses (including quality control (QC) procedures) must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). ***** (3) * * *

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66280 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 1.— WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON SPECIFIC SOURCES— Continued Facility Address Waste description (C) Chlorinated dioxins and furans: 2,3,7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzo p dioxin equivalents, 4 x 10 7 ppm. The petitioned by product must be analyzed for the tetra, penta, hexa, and heptachlorodibenzo p dioxins, and the tetra, penta, hexa, and heptachlorodibenzofurans to determine the 2,3,7,8 tetra chlorodibenzo p dioxin equivalent concentration. The analysis must be conducted using appropriate methods such as SW– 846 Method 8290, a high resolution gas chromatography/ high resolution mass spectrometry method, or other appropriate methods found in other reliable sources, and must achieve practical quantitation limits of 15 parts per trillion (ppt) for the tetra and penta homologs, and 37 ppt for the hexa and hepta homologs. *****

Bethlehem Steel Corporation ............. Sparrows Point, Maryland .. ***** (1) Testing: Sample collection and analyses (including quality control (QC) procedures) must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). If EPA judges the stabilization process to be effective under the conditions used during the initial verification testing, BSC may replace the testing required in Condition (1)( A) with the testing required in Condition (1)( B). BSC must continue to test as specified in Condition (1)( A) until and unless notified by EPA in writing that testing in Condition (1)( A) may be replaced by Condition (1)( B) (to the extent directed by EPA). *****

BMW Manufacturing Corporation ....... Greer, South Carolina ........ ***** (2) Verification Testing Requirements: Sample collection and analyses, including quality control procedures, must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). Methods must meet Performance Based Measurement System Criteria in which the Data Quality Objectives are to demonstrate that representative samples of the BMW Sludge meet the delisting levels in Condition (1). *****

DuraTherm, Incorporated ................... San Leon, Texas ................ ***** (3) Verification Testing Requirements: DuraTherm must perform sample collection and analyses, including quality control procedures, according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). If EPA judges the process to be effective under the operating conditions used during the initial verification testing, DuraTherm may replace the testing required in Paragraph (3)( A) with the testing required in Paragraph (3)( B). DuraTherm must continue to test as specified in Paragraph (3)( A) until and unless notified by EPA in writing that testing in Paragraph (3)( A) may be replaced by Paragraph (3)( B). *****

Eastman Chemical Company ............. Longview, Texas ................ ***** (3) Verification Testing Requirements: Eastman must perform sample collection and analyses, including quality control procedures, according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). After completion of the initial verification period, Eastman may replace the testing required in Condition (3)( A) with the testing required in Condition (3)( B). Eastman must continue to test as specified in Condition (3)( A) until and unless notified by EPA in writing that testing in Condition (3)( A) may be replaced by Condition (3)( B). *****

Envirite of Pennsylvania (formerly Envirite Corporation). York, Pennsylvania ............. *****

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66281 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 1.— WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON SPECIFIC SOURCES— Continued Facility Address Waste description (2) Each batch of treatment residue must be tested for leachable cyanide. If the leachable cyanide levels (using the EP Toxicity test without acetic acid adjustment) exceed 1.26 ppm, the waste must be retreated or managed and disposed as a hazardous waste under 40 CFR Parts 262 to 265 and the permitting standards of 40 CFR Part 270. *****

Geological Reclamation Operations and Systems, Inc.. Morrisville, Pennsylvania .... *****

(1) Testing: Sample collection and analyses, including quality control (QC) procedures, must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). *****

McDonnell Douglas Corporation ........ Tulsa, Oklahoma ................ ***** (3) Verification Testing Requirements: Sample collection and analyses, including quality control procedures, must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). McDonnell Douglas must stabilize the previously unstabilized waste from the bottom portion of the northwest lagoon of the surface impoundment (which was closed as a landfill using fly ash, kiln dust or similar accepted materials in batches of 500 cubic yards or less. McDonnell Douglas must analyze one composite sample from each batch of 500 cubic yards or less. A minimum of four grab samples must be taken from each waste pile (or other designated holding area) of stabilized waste generated from each batch run. Each composited batch sample must be analyzed, prior to disposal of the waste in the batch represented by that sample, for constituents listed in Condition (1). There are no verification testing requirements for the stabilized wastes in the upper portions of the northwest lagoon, the entire northeast lagoon, and the entire south lagoon of the surface impoundments which were closed as a landfill. *****

Occidental Chemical .......................... Ingleside, Texas ................. ***** (3) Verification Testing Requirements: Sample collection and analyses, including quality control procedures, must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). If EPA judges the incineration process to be effective under the operating conditions used during the initial verification testing, Occidental Chemical may replace the testing required in Condition (3)( A) with the testing required in Condition (3)( B). Occidental Chemical must continue to test as specified in Condition (3)( A) until and unless notified by EPA in writing that testing in Condition (3)( A) may be replaced by Condition (3)( B). *****

Rhodia ................................................ Houston, Texas .................. ***** (3) Verification Testing Requirements: Rhodia must perform sample collection and analyses, including quality control procedures, according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). If EPA judges the process to be effective under the operating conditions used during the initial verification testing, Rhodia may replace the testing required in Condition (3)( A) with the testing required in Condition (3)( B). Rhodia must continue to test as specified in Condition (3)( A) until and unless notified by EPA in writing that testing in Condition (3)( A) may be replaced by Condition (3)( B). *****

Syntex Agribusiness ........................... Springfield, MO ................... *****

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66282 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 1.— WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON SPECIFIC SOURCES— Continued Facility Address Waste description (2) Four grab samples of wastewater must be composited from the volume of filtered wastewater collected after each eight hour run and, prior to disposal the composite samples must be analyzed for the EP toxic metals, nickel, and cyanide. If arsenic, chromium, lead, and silver EP leachate test results exceed 0.61 ppm; barium levels exceed 12 ppm; cadmium and selenium levels exceed 0.12 ppm; mercury levels exceed 0.02 ppm; nickel levels exceed 6.1 ppm; or cyanide levels exceed 2.4 ppm, the wastewater must be retreated to achieve these levels or must be disposed in accordance with all applicable hazardous waste regulations Analyses must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). (3) One grab sample must be taken from each drum of kiln and cyclone ash generated during each eight hour run; all grabs collected during a given eight hour run must then be composited to form one composite sample. A composite sample of four grab samples of the separator sludge must be collected at the end of each eight hour run. Prior to the disposal of the residues from each eight hour run, an EP leachate test must be performed on these composite samples and the leachate analyzed for the EP toxic metals, nickel, and cyanide (using a distilled water extraction for the cyanide extraction) to demonstrate that the following maximum allowable treatment residue concentrations listed below are not exceeded. Analyses must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). Any residues which exceed any of the levels listed below must be retreated to achieve these levels or must be disposed in accordance with all applicable hazardous waste regulations. Maximum Allowable Solids Treatment Residue EP Leachate Concentrations (mg/ L), Arsenic— 1.6, Barium— 32, Cadmium— 0.32, Chromium— 1.6, Lead— 1.6, Mercury— 0.065, Nickel— 16, Selenium— 0.32, Silver— 1.6, Cyanide— 6.5. (4) If Syntex stabilizes any of the kiln and cyclone ash or separator sludge, a Portland cement type stabilization process must be used and Syntex must collect a composite sample of four grab samples from each batch of stabilized waste. An MEP leachate test must be performed on these composite samples and the leachate analyzed for the EP toxic metals, nickel, and cyanide (using a distilled water extraction for the cyanide leachate analysis) to demonstrate that the maximum allowable treatment residue concentrations listed in Condition (3) are not exceeded during any run of the MEP extraction. Analyses must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). Any residues which exceed any of the levels listed in Condition (3) must be retreated to achieve these levels or must be disposed in accordance with all applicable hazardous waste regulations. (If the residues are stabilized, the analyses required in this condition supercede the analyses required in Condition (3).)

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66283 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 1.— WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON SPECIFIC SOURCES— Continued Facility Address Waste description (5) Syntex must generate, prior to disposal of residues, verification data from each eight hour run from each treatment residue (i. e., kiln and cyclone ash, separator sludge, and filtered wastewater) to demonstrate that the maximum allowable treatment residue concentrations listed below are not exceeded. Samples must be collected as specified in Conditions (2) and (3). Analyses must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). Any solid or liquid residues which exceed any of the levels listed below must be retreated to achieve these levels or must be disposed in accordance with Subtitle C of RCRA. Maximum Allowable Wastewater Concentrations (ppm): Benz( a) anthracene— 1 x 10 ¥ 4 ; Benzo( a) pyrene— 4 x 10 ¥ 5 ; Benzo( b) fluoranthene— 2 x 10 ¥ 4 ; Chloroform— 0.07; Chrysene— 0.002; Dibenz( a, h) anthracene— 9 x 10 ¥ 6 ; 1,2 Dichloroethane— 0.06; Dichloromethane— 0.06; Indeno( 1,2,3 cd) pyrene— 0.002; Polychlorinated biphenyls— 1 x 10 ¥ 4 ; 1,2,4,5 Tetrachlorobenzene— 0.13; 2,3,4,6 Tetrachlorophenol— 12; Toluene— 120; Trichloroethylene— 0.04; 2,4,5 Trichlorophenol— 49; 2,4,6 Trichlorophenol— 0.02; Maximum Allowable Solid Treatment Residue Concentrations (ppm): Benz( a) anthracene— 1.1; Benzo( a) pyrene— 0.43; Benzo( b) fluoranthene— 1.8; Chloroform— 5.4; Chrysene— 170; Dibenz( a, h) anthracene— 0.083; Dichloromethane— 2.4; 1,2 Dichloroethane— 4.1; Indeno( 1,2,3 cd) pyrene— 330; Polychlorinated biphenyls— 0.31; 1,2,4,5 Tetrachlorobenzene— 720; Trichloroethylene 6.6; 2,4,6 Trichlorophenol— 3.9. (6) Syntex must generate, prior to disposal of residues, verification data from each eight hour run for each treatment residue (i. e., kiln and cyclone ash, separator sludge, and filtered wastewater) to demonstrate that the residues do not contain tetra, penta, or hexachlorodibenzo pdioxins or furans at levels of regulatory concern. Samples must be collected as specified in Conditions (2) and (3). The TCDD equivalent levels for wastewaters must be less than 2 ppq and less than 5 ppt for the solid treatment residues. Any residues with detected dioxins or furans in excess of these levels must be retreated or must be disposed as acutely hazardous. For this analysis, Syntex must use appropriate methods, such as SW– 846 Method 8290, a high resolution gas chromatography and high resolution mass spectroscopy (HRGC/ HRMS) analytical method or use appropriate methods found in other reliable sources. For tetra and pentachloronated dioxin and furan homologs, the maximum practical quantitation limit must not exceed 15 ppt for solids and 120 ppq for wastewaters. For hexachlorinated homologs, the maximum practical quantitation limit must not exceed 37 ppt for solids and 300 ppq for wastewaters. *****

Texas Eastman .................................. Longview, Texas ................ ***** 3. Verification Testing Requirements: Sample collection and analyses, including quality control procedures, must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). If EPA judges the incineration process to be effective under the operating conditions used during the initial verification testing described in Paragraph 4 below, Texas Eastman may replace the testing required in Paragraph 4 with the testing required in Paragraph 5 below. Texas Eastman must, however, continue to test as specified in Paragraph 4 until notified by EPA in writing that testing in Paragraph 4 may be replaced by the testing described in Paragraph 5. *****

Tyco Printed Circuit Group, Melbourne Division. Melbourne, Florida ............. *****

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66284 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 1.— WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON SPECIFIC SOURCES— Continued Facility Address Waste description (1) Verification Testing Requirements: Sample collection and analyses, including quality control procedures must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in EPA Publication SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). Methods must meet Performance Based Measurement System Criteria in which the Data Quality Objectives are to demonstrate that representative samples of the Tyco Sludge meet the delisting levels in Condition (3). *****

17. Appendix IX to part 261 is amended in Table 2: a. In the entry for `` Bethlehem Steel Corp., Steelton, PA, '' under the `` Waste description'' column by revising paragraphs (1) and (2); b. In the entry for `` Bethlehem Steel Corp., Johnston, PA, '' under the `` Waste description'' column by revising paragraphs (1) and (2); c. In the entry for `` BF Goodrich Intermediates Company, Inc., Calvert City, Kentucky, '' under the `` Waste description'' column by revising the introductory paragraph and by revising paragraphs (1)( B) and (3); d. In the entry for `` CF& I Steel Corporation, Pueblo, Colorado, '' under the `` Waste description'' column by revising paragraphs (1) and (2); e. In the entry for `` Chaparral Steel Midlothian L. P., Midlothian, Texas, '' under the `` Waste description'' column by revising paragraph (1) and the introductory text of paragraph (3); f. In the entry for `` Conversion Systems, Inc., Horsham, Pennsylvania, '' under the `` Waste description'' column by revising the introductory text of paragraph (1); g. In the entry for `` DOE– RL, Richland, Washington, '' under the `` Waste description'' column by revising the introductory text of paragraph (1) and by revising paragraph (3); h. In the entry for `` Envirite of Pennsylvania (formerly Envirite Corporation), York, Pennsylvania, under the `` Waste description'' column, by revising paragraph (2); i. In the entry for `` Heritage Environmental Services, LLC, at the Nucor Steel Facility, Crawfordsville, Indiana, '' under the `` Waste Description'' column by revising paragraph (2); j. In the entry for `` Marathon Oil Co., Texas City, Texas, '' under the `` Waste description'' column by revising the introductory text of paragraph (1); k. In the entry for `` Occidental Chemical Corp, Muscle Shoals Plant, Sheffield, Alabama, '' under the `` Waste description'' column by revising the introductory paragraph and by revising paragraphs (1)( A) and (3); l. In the entry for `` Occidental Chemical Corporation, Delaware City, Delaware, '' under the `` Waste description'' column by revising the introductory paragraph and by revising paragraph (1)( A), the introductory text of paragraph (2) and by revising paragraph (3); m. In the entry for `` Oxy Vinyls, Deer Park, Texas, '' under the `` Waste description'' column by revising the introductory text of paragraph (3); n. In the entry for `` Roanoke Electric Steel Corp., Roanoke, Virginia, '' under the `` Waste description'' column by revising paragraphs (1)( A), (1)( B), and (2); o. In the entry for `` USX Steel Corporation, USS Division, Southworks Plant, Gary Works, Chicago, Illinois, '' under the `` Waste description'' column by revising the introductory text of paragraph (1) and by revising paragraphs (1)( A) and (2). The revisions read as follows:

Appendix IX— Wastes Excluded Under §§ 260.20 and 260.22 * * * * *

TABLE 2.— WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SPECIFIC SOURCES Facility Address Waste description Bethlehem Steel Corp ........................ Steelton, PA ....................... ***** (1) Testing: (A) Initial Testing: During the first four weeks of operation of the full scale treatment system, Bethlehem must collect representative grab samples of each treated batch of the CSEAFD and composite the grab samples daily. The daily composites, prior to disposal, must be analyzed for the EP leachate concentrations of all the EP toxic metals, nickel and cyanide (using distilled water in the cyanide extractions). Analyses must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). Bethlehem must report the analytical test data obtained during this initial period no later than 90 days after the treatment of the first full scale batch.

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66285 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 2.— WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SPECIFIC SOURCES— Continued Facility Address Waste description (B) Subsequent Testing: Bethlehem must collect representative grab samples from every treated batch of CSEAFD generated daily and composite all of the grab samples to produce a weekly composite sample. Bethlehem then must analyze each weekly composite sample for the EP leachate concentrations of all the EP toxic metals and nickel. Analyses must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). The analytical data, including all quality control information, must be compiled and maintained on site for a minimum of three years. These data must be furnished upon request and made available for inspection by any employee or representative of EPA or the State of Pennsylvania. (2) Delisting Levels: If the EP extract concentrations resulting from the testing in condition (1)( A) or (1)( B) for chromium, lead, arsenic, or silver exceed 0.315 mg/ L; for barium exceeds 6.3 mg/ l; for cadmium or selenium exceed 0.063 mg/ l; for mercury exceeds 0.0126 mg/ l; for nickel exceeds 3.15 mg/ l; or for cyanide exceeds 4.42 mg/ L; the waste must either be re treated or managed and disposed in accordance with subtitle C of RCRA. *****

Bethlehem Steel Corp ........................ Johnstown, PA ................... ***** (1) Testing: (A) Initial Testing: During the first four weeks of operation of the full scale treatment system, Bethlehem must collect representative grab samples of each treated batch of the CSEAFD and composite the grab samples daily. The daily composites, prior to disposal, must be analyzed for the EP leachate concentrations of all the EP toxic metals, nickel, and cyanide (using distilled water in the cyanide extractions). Analyses must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). Bethlehem must report the analytical test data obtained during this initial period no later than 90 days after the treatment of the first full scale batch. (B) Subsequent Testing: Bethlehem must collect representative grab samples from every treated batch of CSEAFD generated daily and composite all of the grab samples to produce a weekly composite sample. Bethlehem then must analyze each weekly composite sample for the EP leachate concentrations of all the EP toxic metals and nickel. Analyses must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). The analytical data, including all quality control information, must be compiled and maintained on site for a minimum of three years. These data must be furnished upon request and made available for inspection by any employee or representative of EPA or the State of Pennsylvania. (2) If the EP extract concentrations resulting from the testing in condition (1)( A) or (1)( B) for chromium, lead, arsenic, or silver exceed 0.315 mg/ l; for barium exceed 6.3 mg/ l; for cadmium or selenium exceed 0.063 mg/ l; for mercury exceed 0.0126 mg/ l, for nickel exceed 3.15 mg/ l; or for cyanide exceed 4.42 mg/ l; the waste must either be retreated until it meets these levels or managed and disposed in accordance with subtitle C of RCRA. *****

BF Goodrich Intermediates Company, Inc. Calvert City, Kentucky ........ *****

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66286 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 2.— WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SPECIFIC SOURCES— Continued Facility Address Waste description Brine purification muds and saturator insolubles (EPA, Hazardous Waste No. K071) after August 18, 1989. This exclusion is conditional upon the collection and submission of data obtained from BFG's full scale treatment system because BFG's original data was based on data presented by another petitioner using an identical treatment process. To ensure that hazardous constituents are not present in the waste at levels of regulatory concern once the full scale treatment facility is in operation, BFG must implement a testing program. All sampling and analyses including quality control procedures) must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). This testing program must meet the following conditions for the exclusion to be valid: (1) * * * (B) Collect representative grab samples from every batch of treated mercury brine purification muds and treated saturator insolubles on a daily basis and composite the grab samples to produce two separate weekly composite samples (one of the treated mercury brine muds and one of the treated saturator insolubles). Prior to disposal of the treated batches, two weekly composite samples must be analyzed for the EP leachate concentrations of all the EP toxic metals (except mercury), nickel, and cyanide (using distilled water in the cyanide extractions). BFG must report the analytical test data, including all quality control data, obtained during this initial period no later than 90 days after the treatment of the first full scale batch. (2) * * * (3) If, under condition (1) or (2), the EP leachate concentrations for chromium lead, arsenic, or silver exceed 0.316 mg/ l; for barium exceeds 6.31 mg/ l; for cadmium or selenium exceed 0.063 mg/ l; for mercury exceeds 0.0126 mg/ l, for nickel exceeds 3.16 mg/ l; or for cyanide exceeds 4.42 mg/ l; the waste must either be retreated until it meets these levels or managed and disposed of in accordance with subtitle C of RCRA. *****

CF& I Steel Corporation ...................... Pueblo, Colorado ................ ***** (1) Testing: (A) Initial Testing: During the first four weeks of operation of the full scale treatment system, CF& I must collect representative grab samples of each treated batch of the CSEAFD and composite the grab samples daily. The daily composites, prior to disposal, must be analyzed for the EP leachate concentrations of all the EP toxic metals, nickel, and cyanide (using distilled water in the cyanide extractions). Analyses must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). CF& I must report the analytical test data obtained during this initial period no later than 90 days after the treatment of the first full scale batch. (B) Subsequent Testing: CF& I must collect representative grab samples from every treated batch of CSEAFD generated daily and composite all of the grab samples to produce a weekly composite sample. CF& I then must analyze each weekly composite sample for the EP leachate concentrations of all of the EP toxic metals and nickel. Analyses must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). The analytical data, including all quality control information, must be compiled and maintained on site for a minimum of three years. These data must be furnished upon request and made available for inspection by any employee or representative of EPA or the State of Colorado. (2) Delisting levels: If the EP extract concentrations determined in conditions (1)( A) or (1)( B) for chromium, lead, arsenic, or silver exceed 0.315 mg/ l; for barium exceeds 6.3 mg/ l; for cadmium or selenium exceed 0.063 mg/ l; for mercury exceeds 0.0126 mg/ l; for nickel exceeds 3.15 mg/ l; or for cyanide exceeds 4.42 mg/ l; the waste must either be retreated or managed and disposed in accordance with Subtitle C of RCRA. *****

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66287 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 2.— WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SPECIFIC SOURCES— Continued Facility Address Waste description Chaparral Steel Midlothian, L. P ......... Midlothian, Texas ............... ***** (1) Delisting Levels: All concentrations for the constituent total lead in the approximately 2,500 cubic yards (500,000 gallons) per calender year of raw leachate from Landfill No. 3, storm water from the baghouse area, and other K061 wastewaters that is transferred from the storage tank to nonhazardous management must not exceed 0.69 mg/ l (ppm). Constituents must be measured in the waste by appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). (3) Verification Testing Requirements: Sample collection and analyses, including quality control procedures, must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). Chaparral Steel must analyze one composite sample from each batch of untreated wastewater transferred from the hazardous waste storage tank to non hazardous waste management. Each composited batch sample must be analyzed, prior to non hazardous management of the waste in the batch represented by that sample for the constituent lead as listed in Condition (1). Chaparral may treat the waste as specified in Condition (2). If EPA judges the treatment process to be effective during the operating conditions used during the initial verification testing, Chaparral Steel may replace the testing requirement in Condition (3)( A) with the testing requirement in Condition (3)( B). Chaparral must continue to test as specified in (3)( A) until and unless notified by EPA or designated authority that testing in Condition (3)( A) may be replaced with by Condition (3)( B). *****

Conversion Systems, Inc ................... Horsham, Pennsylvania ..... ***** (1) Verification Testing Requirements: Sample collection and analyses, including quality control procedures, must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). *****

DOE– RL ............................................. Richland, Washington ........ ***** (1) Testing: Sample collection and analyses (including quality control (QC) procedures) must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). If EPA judges the treatment process to be effective under the operating conditions used during the initial verification testing, DOE may replace the testing required in Condition (1)( A) with the testing required in Condition (1)( B). DOE must continue to test as specified in Condition (1)( A) until notified by EPA in writing that testing in Condition (1) (A) may be replaced by Condition (1)( B). ***** (2) * * * (3) Delisting Levels: All total constituent concentrations in the waste samples must be measured using appropriate methods such as those found in `` Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/ Chemical Methods '' U. S. EPA Publication SW– 846, or other reliable sources (with the exception of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). All total constituent concentrations must be equal to or less than the following levels (ppm): Inorganic Constituents: Ammonium— 10.0; Antimony— 0.06; Arsenic— 0.5; Barium— 20.0; Beryllium— 0.04; Cadmium— 0.05; Chromium— 1.0; Cyanide 2.0; Fluoride— 40.0; Lead— 0.15; Mercury— 0.02; Nickel— 1.0; Selenium 0.5; Silver— 2.0; Vanadium— 2.0; Zinc— 100.0.

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66288 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 2.— WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SPECIFIC SOURCES— Continued Facility Address Waste description Organic Constituents: Acetone— 40.0; Benzene— 0.05; Benzyl alcohol— 100.0; 1 Butyl alcohol— 40.0; Carbon tetrachloride— 0.05; Chlorobenzene 1.0; Chloroform— 0.1; Cresol— 20.0; 1,4 Dichlorobenzene— 0.75; 1,2 Dichloroethane— 0.05; 1,1 Dichloroethylene— 0.07; Di n octyl phthalate— 7.0; Hexachloroethane— 0.06; Methyl ethyl ketone— 200.0; Methyl isobutyl ketone— 30.0; Naphthalene— 10.0; Tetrachloroethylene— 0.05; Toluene— 10.0; Tributyl phosphate— 0.2; 1,1,1 Trichloroethane— 2.0; 1,1,2 Trichloroethane— 0.05; Trichloroethylene 0.05; Vinyl Chloride— 0.02. *****

Envirite of Pennsylvania (formerly Envirite Corporation). York, Pennsylvania ............. *****

(2) Each batch of treatment residue must be tested for leachable cyanide. If the leachable cyanide levels (using the EP Toxicity test without acetic acid adjustment) exceed 1.26 ppm, the waste must be re treated or managed and disposed as a hazardous waste under 40 CFR Parts 262 to 265 and the permitting standards of 40 CFR Part 270. *****

Heritage Environmental Services, LLC, at the Nucor Steel facility. Crawfordsville, Indiana ....... *****

(2) Verification Testing: On a monthly basis, Heritage or Nucor must analyze two samples of the waste using the TCLP, SW– 846 Method 1311, with an extraction fluid of ph 12 ± 0.05 standard units and for the mercury determinative analysis of the leachate using an appropriate method such as Method 7470 found in EPA Publication SW– 846, or use an appropriate method found in other reliable sources. The constituent concentrations measured must be less then the delisting levels established in Paragraph (1). *****

Marathon Oil Co ................................. Texas City, TX .................... ***** (1) Testing: Sample collection and analyses (including quality control (QC) procedures) must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). If EPA judges the treatment process to be effective under the operating conditions used during the initial verification testing, Marathon may replace the testing required in Condition (1)( A) with the testing required in Condition (1)( B). Marathon must continue to test as specified in Condition (1)( A), including testing for organics in Conditions (3)( B) and (3)( C), until and unless notified by EPA in writing that testing in Condition (1)( A) may be replaced by Condition (1)( B), or that testing for organics may be terminated as described in (1)( C) (to the extent directed by EPA). *****

Occidental Chemical Corp., Muscle Shoals Plant. Sheffield, Alabama ............. *****

Retorted wastewater treatment sludge from the mercury cell process in chlorine production (EPA Hazardous Waste No. K106) after September 19, 1989. This exclusion is conditional upon the submission of data obtained from Occidental's full scale retort treatment system because Occidental's original data were based on a pilot scale retort system. To ensure that hazardous constituents are not present in the waste at levels of regulatory concern once the full scale treatment facility is in operation Occidental must implement a testing program. All sampling and analyses (including quality control procedures) must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). This testing program must meet the following conditions for the exclusion to be valid: (1) * * *

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66289 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 2.— WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SPECIFIC SOURCES— Continued Facility Address Waste description (A) Collect representative grab samples from every batch of retorted material and composite the grab samples to produce a weekly composite sample. The weekly composite samples, prior to disposal or recycling, must be analyzed for the EP leachate concentrations of all the EP toxic metals (except mercury), nickel, and cyanide (using distilled water in the cyanide extractions). Occidental must report the analytical test data, including all quality control data, obtained during this initial period no later than 90 days after the treatment of the first full scale batch. *** (2) * * * (3) If, under condition (1) or (2), the EP leachate concentrations for chromium lead, arsenic, or silver exceed 1.616 mg/ l; for barium exceeds 32.3 mg/ l; for cadmium or selenium exceed 0.323 mg/ l; for mercury exceeds 0.065 mg/ l, for nickel exceeds 16.15 mg/ l; or for cyanide exceeds 22.61 mg/ l; the waste must either be retreated until it meets these levels or managed and disposed of in accordance with subtitle C of RCRA. *****

Occidental Chemical Corporation ...... Delaware City, Delaware .... ***** Sodium chloride treatment muds (NaCl– TM), sodium chloride saturator cleanings (NaCl– SC), and potassium chloride treatment muds (KCl– TM) (all classified as EPA Hazardous Waste No. K071) generated at a maximum combined rate (for all three wastes) of 1,018 tons per year. This exclusion was published on April 29, 1991 and is conditioned upon the collection of data from Occidental's full scale brine treatment system because Occidental's request for exclusion was based on data from a laboratory scale brine treatment process. To ensure that hazardous constituents are not present in the waste at levels of regulatory concern once the full scale treatment system is in operation, Occidental must implement a testing program for the petitioned waste. All sampling and analyses (including quality control (QC) procedures) must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). This testing program must meet the following conditions for the exclusion to be valid: (1) * * * (A) Collect representative grab samples from each batch of the three treated wastestreams (sodium chloride saturator cleanings (NaCl– SC), sodium chloride treatment muds (NaCl– TM) and potassium chloride treatment muds (KCl– TM)) on an as generated basis and composite the samples to produce three separate weekly composite samples (of each type of K071 waste). The three weekly composite samples, prior to disposal must be analyzed for the EP leachate concentrations of all the EP toxic metals (except mercury), nickel, and cyanide (using distilled water in the cyanide extractions). Occidental must report the waste volumes produced and the analytical test data, including all quality control data, obtained during this initial period, no later than 90 days after the treatment of the first full scale batch. *** (2) Subsequent Testing: After the first four weeks of full scale treatment operations, Occidental must do the following; all sampling and analyses (including quality control procedures) must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution): *** (3) If, under conditions (1) or (2), the EP leachate concentrations for chromium lead, arsenic, or silver exceed 0.77 mg/ l; for barium exceeds 15.5 mg/ l; for cadmium or selenium exceed 0.16 mg/ l; for mercury exceeds 0.031 mg/ l, or for nickel or total cyanide exceeds 10.9 mg/ l; the waste must either be retreated or managed and disposed of in accordance with all applicable hazardous waste regulations. *****

Oxy Vinyls .......................................... Deer Park, Texas ............... *****

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66290 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 2.— WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SPECIFIC SOURCES— Continued Facility Address Waste description (3) Verification Testing Requirements: Sample collection and analyses, including quality control procedures, must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). If EPA judges the incineration process to be effective under the operating conditions used during the initial verification testing, Oxy Vinyls may replace the testing required in Condition (3)( A) with the testing required in Condition (3)( B). Oxy Vinyls must continue to test as specified in Condition (3)( A) until and unless notified by EPA in writing that testing in Condition (3)( A) may be replaced by Condition (3)( B). *****

Roanoke Electric Steel Corp .............. Roanoke, VA ...................... ***** (1) * * * (A) Initial Testing: During the first four weeks of operation of the full scale treatment system, Roanoke must collect representative grab samples of each treated batch of the CSEAFD and composite the grab samples daily. The daily composites, prior to disposal, must be analyzed for the EP leachate concentrations of all the EP toxic metals, nickel and cyanide (using distilled water in the cyanide extractions). Analyses must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). Roanoke must report the analytical test data obtained during this initial period no later than 90 days after the treatment of the first full scale batch. (B) Subsequent Testing: Roanoke must collect representative grab samples from every treated batch of CSEAFD generated daily and composite all of the grab samples to produce a weekly composite sample. Roanoke then must analyze each weekly composite sample for all of the EP toxic metals and nickel. Analyses must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). The analytical data, including all quality control information, must be compiled and maintained on site for a minimum of three years. These data must be furnished upon request and made available for inspection by any employee or representative of EPA or the State of Virginia. (2) Delisting levels: If the EP extract concentrations for chromium, lead, arsenic, or silver exceed 0.315 mg/ l; for barium exceeds 6.3 mg/ l; for cadmium or selenium exceed 0.63 mg/ l; for mercury exceeds 0.0126 mg/ l, for nickel exceeds 3.15 mg/ l, or for cyanide exceeds 1.26 mg/ l; the waste must either be re treated or managed and disposed in accordance with subtitle C of RCRA. *****

USX Steel Corporation, USS Division, Southworks Plant, Gary Works. Chicago, Illinois .................. *****

(1) Testing: Sample collection and analyses (including quality control (QC) procedures) must be performed according to appropriate methods such as those found in SW– 846 or other reliable sources (with the exception of analyses requiring the use of SW– 846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11, which must be used without substitution). (A) Initial Testing: During the first four weeks of operation of the full scale treatment system, USX must collect representative grab samples of each treated batch of the CSEAFD and composite the grab samples daily. The daily composites, prior to disposal, must be analyzed for the EP leachate concentrations of all the EP toxic metals, nickel, and cyanide (using distilled water in the cyanide extractions). USX must report the analytical test data, including quality control information, obtained during this initial period no later than 90 days after the treatment of the first full scale batch. ***

VerDate 0ct< 09> 2002 17: 56 Oct 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 30OCP3. SGM 30OCP3 66291 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 2.— WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SPECIFIC SOURCES— Continued Facility Address Waste description (2) Delisting levels: If the EP extract concentrations for chromium, lead, arsenic, or silver exceed 0.315 mg/ l; for barium exceeds 6.3 mg/ l; for cadmium or selenium exceed 0.063 mg/ l; for mercury exceeds 0.0126 mg/ l; for nickel exceeds 3.15 mg/ l; or for cyanide exceeds 4.42 mg/ l, the waste must either be re treated until it meets these levels or managed and disposed in accordance with subtitle C of RCRA.

* * * * *

PART 264— STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES 20. The authority citation for part 264 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U. S. C. 6905, 6912( a), 6924, and 6925.

Subpart AA— Air Emissions Standards for Process Vents 21. Section 264.1034 is amended by revising paragraphs (c)( 1)( ii), (c)( 1)( iv), (d)( 1)( iii) and (f) to read as follows:

§ 264.1034 Test methods and procedures.

* * * * * (c) * * * (1) * * * (ii) Method 18 or Method 25A in 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, for organic content. If Method 25A is used, the organic HAP used as the calibration gas must be the single organic HAP representing the largest percent by volume of the emissions. The use of Method 25A is acceptable if the response from the high level calibration gas is at least 20 times the standard deviation of the response from the zero calibration gas when the instrument is zeroed on the most sensitive scale. * * * * * (iv) Total organic mass flow rates shall be determined by the following equation: (A) For sources utilizing Method 18.

E Q CMW h n =           [ ] [ ] i=     2sdii 1 6 10 0.0416