Kathy Kaufman/ RTP/ USEPA/ US 06/ 15/ 2005 09: 09 AM To aflynn@ omb. eop. gov cc Mary Henigin/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA Subject Fw: BART files for OMB log in [ attachment " draft BART final guidelines 06 14 05 edits  clean. wpd"] [ attachment " draft BART final preamble 06 14 05  more edits  clean. wpd"]

Kathy Kaufman EPA/ OAQPS Mail Code C504 02 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone 919 541 0102 Fax 919 541 5489  Forwarded by Kathy Kaufman/ RTP/ USEPA/ US on 06/ 15/ 2005 08: 54 AM

Kathy Kaufman/ RTP/ USEPA/ US 06/ 14/ 2005 05: 44 PM To Mary Henigin/ DC/ USEPA/ US cc Denise Johnson/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, " Joseph Dougherty" < dougherty. joseph@ epa. gov>, Lesley Schaaff/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Lydia Wegman/ RTP/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Mariana Cubeddu/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Stephanie Daigle/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Teri Porterfield/ RTP/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Tricia Crabtree/ RTP/ USEPA/ US@ EPA Subject Re: Fw: BART files for OMB THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kathy Kaufman EPA/ OAQPS Mail Code C504 02 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone 919 541 0102 Fax 919 541 5489 Mary Henigin/ DC/ USEPA/ US 06/ 14/ 2005 04: 37 PM To Stephanie Daigle/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Lesley Schaaff/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA cc Lydia Wegman/ RTP/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Denise Johnson/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Mariana Cubeddu/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, " Joseph Dougherty" < dougherty. joseph@ epa. gov>, Kathy Kaufman/ RTP/ USEPA/ US, Tricia Crabtree/ RTP/ USEPA/ US@ EPA, Teri Porterfield/ RTP/ USEPA/ US Subject Fw: BART files for OMB The BART OMB package has been signed out of OAR and this version will be delivered to Mariana Cubeddu for approval to OMB.

Thank you.

Mary Mariana, Denise Johnson and Joe Dougherty will be retrieving the earlier version ( disk and hard copies) and replacing with this version.

From: Mary Henigin Sent: 06/ 14/ 2005 04: 25 PM To: Denise Johnson Subject: Fw: BART files for OMB From: Kathy Kaufman Sent: 06/ 14/ 2005 04: 15 PM To: Stephanie Daigle; Lesley Schaaff Cc: Lydia Wegman; Joe Paisie; Jeff Holmstead; Bill Wehrum; Lea Anderson; William Nickerson; Todd Hawes; Mary Henigin; Alan Rush; Geoffrey Anderson Subject: BART files for OMB [ attachment " draft BART final preamble 06 14 05  edits. wpd"] [ attachment " draft BART final guidelines 06 14 05 edits. wpd"] Kathy Kaufman EPA/ OAQPS Mail Code C504 02 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone 919 541 0102 Fax 919 541 5489


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 26 (Thursday, February 7, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2453-2456]
[FR Doc No: 2019-01320]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 80

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0114; FRL-9988-86-OAR]
RIN 2060-AU32

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Removal of the
Reformulated Gasoline Program From the Northern Kentucky Portion of the
Cincinnati-Hamilton Ozone Maintenance Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this final action, EPA is amending its reformulated
gasoline regulations to reflect that Boone, Campbell, and Kenton
counties in Kentucky (the Northern Kentucky Area), which are part of
the Cincinnati-Hamilton, Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana ozone area, are no
longer federal reformulated gasoline (RFG) covered areas as of July 1,
2018. As described in a separate document published on May 16, 2018,
pursuant to EPA's regulations, EPA approved an April 18, 2017 petition
from the state of Kentucky to opt-out of the federal RFG program and
removed the requirement to sell federal RFG in the Northern Kentucky
Area as of July 1, 2018. This effective date applies to retailers,
wholesale purchaser-consumers, refiners, importers, and distributors.
This rulemaking merely conforms the list of RFG covered areas in the
regulations to reflect the effective date of the opt-out for the
Northern Kentucky Area.

DATES: This final rule is effective on February 7, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Dickinson, Office of
Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202)
343-9256; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Rudy Kapichak,
Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 2000 Traverwood, Ann Arbor, MI 48105; telephone number: 734-
214-4574; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    The contents of this preamble are listed in the following outline:

I. General Information
II. Background
III. Action
IV. Public Participation
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
VI. Legal Authority and Statutory Provisions

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    Entities potentially affected by this final action are fuel
producers and distributors who do business in the Northern Kentucky
Area.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                NAICS 1
          Examples of potentially regulated entities             codes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petroleum refineries.........................................     324110
                                                                  424710
Gasoline Marketers and Distributors..........................     424720
Gasoline Retail Stations.....................................     447110
Gasoline Transporters........................................     484220
                                                                  484230
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System.

    The above table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated
by this action. The table lists the types of entities of which EPA is
aware that potentially could be affected by this final action. Other
types of entities not listed on the table could also be affected. To
determine whether your organization could be affected by this final
action, you should carefully examine the regulations in 40 CFR part 80,
subpart D--Reformulated Gasoline. If you have questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, see the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0114. All documents in the docket are listed on the
www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some
information may not be publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available
electronically through www.regulations.gov.

II. Background

A. RFG Opt-Out Procedures

    The reformulated gasoline (RFG) opt-out regulations (40 CFR 80.72--
Procedures for opting out of the covered areas) provide the process and
criteria for a reasonable transition out of the federal RFG program if
a state decides to opt-out.\2\ These opt-out regulations provide that
the governor of the state must submit a petition to the Administrator
requesting to opt-out of the federal RFG program. The petition must
include specific information on how, if at all, the state has relied on
RFG in a proposed or approved state implementation plan (SIP) or plan
revision and, if RFG is relied upon, how the SIP will be revised to
reflect the state's opt-out from RFG. The opt-out regulations also
provide that EPA will notify the state in writing of the Agency's
action on the petition and the date the opt-out becomes effective
(i.e., the date RFG is no longer required in the affected area) when
the petition is approved. The opt-out regulations also provide that EPA
will publish a Federal Register document announcing the approval of any
opt-out petition and the effective date of such opt-out. If a SIP
revision is required, the effective date of EPA's approval of the opt-
out can be no less than 90 days from the effective date of EPA's
approval of the revision to the SIP that removes RFG as a control
measure. See 40 CFR 80.72(c)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Pursuant to authority under CAA sections 211(c) and (k) and
301(a), EPA promulgated regulations at 40 CFR 80.72 to provide
criteria and general procedures for states to opt-out of the RFG
program where the state had previously voluntarily opted into the
program. The regulations were initially adopted on July 8, 1996 (61
FR 35673) (the RFG ``Opt-out Rule''); and were revised on October
20, 1997 (62 FR 54552).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Kentucky Opt-In and Opt-Out of RFG for the Northern Kentucky Area

    In 1995, Kentucky voluntarily opted Boone, Campbell, and Kenton
Counties (the Northern Kentucky Area), into the federal RFG program.
Kentucky also opted its portion of the Louisville ozone area (Jefferson
County and parts of Bullitt and Oldham Counties) into the federal RFG
program; however, this action does not affect the use of RFG in the
Kentucky portion of the Louisville ozone area. A current listing of the
RFG covered areas and a summary of RFG requirements can be found at 40
CFR 80.70 and on EPA's website at: https://www.epa.gov/gasoline-standards/reformulated-gasoline.
    On April 18, 2017, Kentucky submitted a petition to the EPA
Administrator requesting to opt-out from the federal RFG program for
the Northern Kentucky Area.\3\ In order to

fulfill the requirements of the RFG opt-out regulations and to support
its initial request, on September 13, 2017, Kentucky submitted a
revision to its maintenance plan for the Northern Kentucky Area to
remove the emissions reductions associated with the use of RFG in this
area and to demonstrate that the RFG opt-out would not interfere with
the area's ability to attain or maintain the 2008 ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and any other NAAQS as required by
Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110(l). (See 40 CFR 80.72(b)). EPA
published a proposed approval of the SIP revision on February 14, 2018
(83 FR 6496) and a final approval of the SIP revision on April 2, 2018
(83 FR 13872). The final approval of the maintenance plan revision was
effective upon publication, on April 2, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Secretary of Kentucky's Energy and Environment Cabinet
submitted the opt-out petition on behalf of the Commonwealth of
Kentucky. A copy of the opt-out petition is included in the docket.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By letter dated April 30, 2018, EPA informed Kentucky of the grant
of its petition as required by the RFG Opt-Out Rule. EPA also indicated
that the effective date of the RFG opt-out for the Northern Kentucky
Area would be July 1, 2018, which is 90 days after the effective date
of EPA's approval of the maintenance plan revision and CAA section
110(l) analysis, as required by 40 CFR 80.72(c)(7). On May 16, 2018,
EPA published the Federal Register document required by the RFG Opt-Out
Rule that informed the public of the July 1, 2018 effective date and
indicated that EPA would publish a final rule later to remove the
Northern Kentucky Area from the list of RFG covered areas in 40 CFR
80.70 after the effective date of the opt-out (83 FR 22595). The July
1, 2018 opt-out effective date is the date for the removal of the
prohibition on the sale of conventional gasoline in the Northern
Kentucky Area and applies to retailers, wholesale purchasers-consumers,
refiners, importers, and distributors of gasoline.

III. Action

    In this rule, EPA is amending 40 CFR 80.70(j) to reflect that the
Northern Kentucky Area (Boone, Campbell, and Kenton counties) is no
longer a federal RFG covered area. This final rule merely conforms the
applicable regulations with EPA's prior approval of the Kentucky
petition.

IV. Public Participation

    EPA is issuing this final action without prior notice and comment.
The rulemaking procedures provided in CAA section 307(d) do not apply
when the Agency for good cause finds that notice-and-comment procedures
are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest
pursuant to section 553(b)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This is a ministerial action that amends 40 CFR 80.70
to reflect the prior EPA approval of Kentucky's opt-out petition, which
was based on criteria in EPA regulations for opting out of the federal
RFG program. In the RFG opt-out regulations, EPA established a petition
process that would address, on a case-by-case basis, future individual
state requests to opt-out of the RFG program. The regulations
established clear and objective criteria for EPA to apply that include
criteria for when a state's petition is complete and the appropriate
transition time for opt-out of the RFG program. Further, at the time of
promulgation of those regulations, EPA had explained that the
application of these regulatory criteria on a case-by-case basis to
individual opt-out requests would not require notice-and-comment
rulemaking, either under CAA section 307(d) or the Administrative
Procedure Act.
    Here, and as explained in the approval action, EPA is simply
revising the list of RFG covered areas in 40 CFR 80.70 to conform with
EPA's prior approval of Kentucky's request, which was effective on July
1, 2018 (83 FR 22595). That approval was a separate action, which was
based on criteria in EPA's regulations for opting out of the federal
RFG program and is not the subject of this rule. For these reasons, EPA
finds that notice-and-comment procedures under CAA section 307(d)(1)
are unnecessary.
    This final rule is effective immediately upon publication. Section
553(d)(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1),
provides that final rules shall not become effective until 30 days
after publication in the Federal Register ``except . . . a substantive
rule which grants or recognizes an exemption or relieves a
restriction.'' The purpose of this provision is to ``give affected
parties a reasonable time to adjust their behavior before the final
rule takes effect.'' Omnipoint Corp. v. Fed. Commc'n Comm'n, 78 F.3d
620, 630 (D.C. Cir. 1996); see also United States v. Gavrilovic, 551
F.2d 1099, 1104 (8th Cir. 1977) (quoting legislative history). However,
when the agency finalizes an exemption or relieves a restriction,
affected parties do not need a reasonable time to adjust because the
affect is not adverse. EPA has determined that the finalized rule does
not change any regulatory obligations and merely revises the list of
covered areas in 40 CFR 80.70 to reflect EPA's prior action on May 16,
2018 which relieved a restriction (the requirement of the federal RFG
program) in the Northern Kentucky Area. For these reasons, this rule
will be effective immediately upon publication.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order

13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
    This action is not a significant regulatory action and therefore
was not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review.

B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs

    This action is considered an Executive Order 13771 deregulatory
action. This final rule and EPA's earlier approval of Kentucky's
request to opt the three counties in the Northern Kentucky Area out of
the federal RFG program provide meaningful burden reduction because it
removes the requirements of the federal RFG program for gasoline sold
in the Northern Kentucky Area and, as a result, fuel suppliers will no
longer be required to sell gasoline that meets the federal RFG
standards. Removing the federal RFG requirements will also be
beneficial because this action can improve the fungibility of gasoline
sold in the State of Kentucky by allowing gasoline sold in the Northern
Kentucky Area to be identical to fuel sold in most of Kentucky.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose any information collection burden under
the PRA, because it does not contain any information collection
activities.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In
making this determination, the impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small entities. An agency may certify that a
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, has no
net burden or otherwise has a positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. The small entities subject to the
requirements of this action are refiners, importers or blenders of
gasoline that choose to produce or import gasoline that meets the
federal RFG program requirements

for sale in the Northern Kentucky Area, and gasoline distributers and
retail stations in the Northern Kentucky Area. EPA previously approved
Kentucky's request to opt the three counties in the Northern Kentucky
Area out of the federal RFG program remove the federal RFG requirements
for gasoline sold in the Northern Kentucky Area as of July 1, 2018.
This action merely amends the regulation at 40 CFR 80.70 to reflect the
Northern Kentucky Area is no longer a covered area. This action does
not impose any requirements or create impacts on small entities beyond
those, if any, already required by or resulting from the CAA section
211(k) federal RFG program. We have therefore concluded that this
action will have no net regulatory burden for all directly regulated
small entities.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This final rule does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100
million or more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. EPA previously
approved Kentucky's request to opt the three counties in the Northern
Kentucky Area out of the federal RFG program removed a requirement for
the sale of federal RFG in the area as provided for in CAA section
211(k) and EPA's regulations at 40 CFR 80.72. This action merely amends
the regulation at 40 CFR 80.70 to reflect the Northern Kentucky Area is
no longer a covered area.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. EPA's earlier approval of Kentucky's request to
opt the three counties in the Northern Kentucky Area out of the federal
RFG program affected only those refiners, importers or blenders of
gasoline that chose to produce or import gasoline that met federal RFG
program requirements for sale in the Northern Kentucky Area and
gasoline distributers and retail stations in the Area. This action
merely amends the regulation at 40 CFR 80.70 to reflect the Northern
Kentucky Area is no longer a covered area. Thus, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this action.

H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children,
per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of
the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order
13045 because it does not concern an environmental health risk or
safety risk. EPA has no reason to believe that this action will
disproportionately affect children since Kentucky has provided evidence
that opt-out from the federal RFG gasoline program will not interfere
with its attainment of the ozone NAAQS, or any other applicable CAA
requirement. By separate action, EPA has approved Kentucky's non-
interference demonstration regarding its maintenance plan for the 2008
ozone NAAQS, and that Kentucky's opt-out from the federal RFG gasoline
program in the Northern Kentucky Area will not interfere with any other
NAAQS or CAA requirement.

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed by
this action will not have potential disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income or
indigenous populations because it does not affect the applicable ozone
NAAQS which establish the level of protection provided to human health
or the environment. EPA previously approved Kentucky's request to opt
the three counties in the Northern Kentucky Area out of the federal RFG
program removes the federal RFG gasoline program requirements for the
Northern Kentucky Area. EPA has concluded that the federal RFG opt-out
will not cause a measurable increase in ozone concentrations that would
result in a violation of any ozone NAAQS including the 2008 ozone NAAQS
and the more stringent 2015 ozone NAAQS. Therefore, disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations are not an anticipated result. The results of
this evaluation are contained in EPA's proposed and final rules for
Kentucky's non-interference demonstration. A copy of Kentucky's April
12, 2017 letter requesting that EPA relax the gasoline RVP standard,
and Kentucky's September 13, 2017 letter that included additional
technical analysis demonstrating that the opt-out from the federal RFG
program would not interfere with continued maintenance of the 2008
ozone NAAQS in the Northern Kentucky Area, or with any other applicable
CAA requirement, has been placed in the public docket for this action.
This action merely amends the regulation at 40 CFR 80.70 to reflect the
Northern Kentucky Area is no longer a covered area.

L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the CRA, and EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller of the
United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).

VI. Legal Authority and Statutory Provisions

    The statutory authority for this action is granted to EPA by
sections 211(k) and 301(a) of the Clean Air Act, as amended; 42 U.S.C.
7545(h) and 7601(a).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 80

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Fuel additives, Gasoline, Motor vehicle and
motor vehicle engines, Motor vehicle pollution, Penalties, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 21, 2018.
Andrew R. Wheeler,
Acting Administrator.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part
80 as follows:

PART 80--REGULATION OF FUELS AND FUEL ADDITIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 80 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7414, 7521, 7542, 7545, and 7601(a).

0
2. Section 80.70 is amended by revising paragraph (j)(3) to read as
follows:

Sec.  80.70  Covered areas.

* * * * *
    (j) * * *
    (3) Jefferson County, Kentucky;
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-01320 Filed 2-6-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 205 (Thursday, October 22, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 67315-67316]
[FR Doc No: 2020-22910]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0872; Airspace Docket No. 20-AGL-33]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Prairie Du Chien, WI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend the Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at Prairie Du Chien Municipal
Airport, Prairie Du Chien, WI. The FAA is proposing this action as the
result of an airspace review caused by the decommissioning of the
Waukon VHF omnidirectional range (VOR) navigation aid as part of the
VOR Minimum Operational Network (MON) Program. The geographic
coordinates of the airport would also be updated to coincide with the
FAA's aeronautical database.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 7, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone
(202) 366-9826, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2020-0872/Airspace Docket No. 20-AGL-33, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at https://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
    FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11E at NARA, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Prairie Du Chien Municipal Airport, Prairie Du
Chien, WI, to support instrument flight rule operations at this
airport.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory

decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited on the
overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and energy-
related aspects of the proposal. Communications should identify both
docket numbers and be submitted in triplicate to the address listed
above. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their
comments on this notice must submit with those comments a self-
addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made:
``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2020-0872/Airspace Docket No. 20-AGL-33.''
The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Federal Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and effective
September 15, 2020. FAA Order 7400.11E is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by amending the Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface to within a 6.6-mile (decreased
from a 9.3-mile) radius of Prairie Du Chien Municipal Airport, Prairie
Du Chien, WI; removing the Waukon VORTAC and associated extension;
adding an extension 1 mile each side of the 110[deg] bearing from the
airport extending from the 6.6-mile radius to 6.8 miles east of the
airport; adding an extension 1 mile each side of the 140[deg] bearing
from the airport extending from the 6.6-mile radius to 10.4 miles
southeast of the airport; adding an extension 1 mile each side of the
320[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 6.6-mile radius to
10.6 miles northwest of the airport; and updating the geographic
coordinates of the airport to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical
database.
    This action is the result of an airspace review caused by the
decommissioning of the Waukon VOR, which provided navigation
information for the instrument procedures this airport, as part of the
VOR MON Program.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.11E, dated July 21, 2020, and effective September 15,
2020, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11E,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and
effective September 15, 2020, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AGL WI E5 Prairie Du Chien, WI [Amended]

Prairie Du Chien Municipal Airport, WI
    (Lat. 43[deg]01'09'' N, long. 91[deg]07'25'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.6-mile radius of Prairie Du Chien Municipal Airport, and
within 1 mile each side of the 110[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the 6.6-mile radius to 6.8 miles east of the airport,
and within 1 mile each side of the 140[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the 6.6-mile radius to 10.4 miles southeast of the
airport, and within 1 mile each side of the 320[deg] bearing from
the airport extending from the 6.6-mile radius to 10.6 miles
northwest of the airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 13, 2020.
Martin A. Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2020-22910 Filed 10-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


AGENDA FIFRA SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY PANEL ( SAP) OPEN MEETING THURSDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2004 FIFRA SAP WEB SITE http:// www. epa. gov/ scipoly/ sap/ OPP Docket Telephone: ( 703 305 5805) Docket Number: OPP 2004 0343 Holiday Inn Rosslyn at Key Bridge 1900 North Fort Myer Drive, Arlington, VA 22209 Telephone: ( 703 807 2000)

Use of Pharmacokinetic Data to Refine Carbaryl Risk Estimates from Oral and Dermal Exposure ° 8: 30 AM Introduction and Identification of Panel Members  Steven G. Heeringa, Ph. D. ( FIFRA SAP Session Chair) ° 8: 45 AM Administrative Procedures by Designated Federal Official  Mr. Joseph E. Bailey ° 8: 50 AM Welcome  Mr. Joseph J. Merenda, Jr. ( Director, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA) ° 8: 55 AM Opening Remarks  Randolph Perfetti, Ph. D. ( Health Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA) ° 9: 00 AM Presentation: Use of Pharmacokinetic Data to Refine Carbaryl Risk Estimates from Oral and Dermal Exposure  Kit Farwell, D. V. M. ( Health Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA) ° 10: 00 AM BREAK ° 10: 15 AM Presentation: Continued ° 12: 00 AM LUNCH ° 1: 00 PM Public Comments ° 2: 00 PM Panel Discussion Charge Question 1  Design of Pharmacokinetic Studies:

A series of pharmacokinetic and metabolism studies were completed that serve as the basis for the proposed approach associated with childrens' exposure to carbaryl after lawn treatments. These studies included dosing rats via several routes ( i. e., oral, dermal, and intravenous). In a subsequent study, carbaryl was administered to rats via the oral and dermal routes simultaneously at exposure levels similar to those calculated in the Agency's deterministic exposure assessment for toddlers playing on treated lawns. ( A) Please comment on the design of these experiments with respect to the usefulness of results to estimate peak tissue levels for risk assessment purposes.

( B) The design of the multi route study was intended to mimic the concurrent oral and dermal exposures of toddlers playing on treated lawns. Please comment on this approach.

° 3: 00 PM BREAK ° 3: 15 PM Panel Discussion Charge Question 2  Pharmacokinetic Approach:

Historically, risk assessments completed by the Agency have been based on comparison of endpoints associated with total administered dose levels from toxicology studies with daily human exposure. The proposed pharmacokinetic approach presented in this paper instead relies on the use of peak internal dose at the target tissue. Because of the rapid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of carbaryl, a more appropriate dose metric may be the use of peak target tissue levels for calculating exposure estimates instead of total daily absorbed dose values.

( A) Please comment on the appropriateness of using peak levels for estimating exposure.

( B) This pharmacokinetic approach assumes that toddlers put their hands in their mouths at a rate of 20 times an hour for 2 hours. A laboratory dosing regimen that exactly mimics this toddler behavior is impractical. As such, oral doses were administered in the multi route rat study once per hour for 2 hours. The proposed approach uses an algorithm to adjust the results for 2 hourly bolus doses to that of a toddler which occurs 20 times per hour. Given the rapid metabolism of carbaryl, please comment on whether this algorithm can be reasonably used to predict the expected pharmacokinetic behavior of carbaryl.

( C) To convert the four 24 hour time periods in the biomonitoring study to a shorter time period and to account for plateau tissue concentrations, Bayer proposed extrapolating results from the rat mixed dose study to the biomonitoring study in this manner. Because the margin of exposure calculated using estimated plateau brain concentrations was approximately 20 fold greater than the margin ofexposure calculated using EPA's SOPs For Residential Exposure Assessment, Bayer proposed multiplying results from the biomonitoring study by an adjustment factor of 20. Please comment on whether this approach is appropriate for extrapolating from results in the rat pharmacokinetic study to the biomonitoring study.

° 5: 00 PM ADJOURNMENT Please be advised that agenda times are approximate. For further information, please contact the Designated Federal Official for the meeting, Joseph E. Bailey, via telephone: ( 202) 564 8450; fax ( 202) 564 8382; or email: bailey. joseph@ epa. gov


[Federal Register: September 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 183)]
[Notices]
[Page 57782-57785]
[DOCID:fr22se10-72]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0734; FRL-8845-2]

Registration Review; Pesticide Dockets Opened for Review and
Comment; Amended Work Plan for Imidacloprid

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has established registration review dockets for the
pesticides listed in the table in Unit III.A. With this document, EPA
is opening the public comment period for these registration reviews.
Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide registrations
to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the statutory
standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform its
intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human health
or the environment. Registration review dockets contain information
that will assist the public in understanding the types of information
and issues that the Agency may consider during the course of
registration reviews. Through this program, EPA is ensuring that each
pesticide's registration is based on

current scientific and other knowledge, including its effects on human
health and the environment. This document also announces the Agency's
intent not to open a registration review docket for the pesticide
active ingredients maneb, mitin FF, and urea. These pesticides do not
currently have any actively registered pesticide products and are not,
therefore, subject to review under the registration review program. EPA
is also announcing that the docket for formetanate hydrochloride, which
was planned for September 2010, has been delayed until December 2010.
    In addition, EPA is announcing the availability of an amended final
work plan for the registration review of the pesticide imidacloprid;
this workplan has been amended to incorporate revisions to the data
requirements.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 22, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments identified by the docket identification
(ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest provided in the
table in Unit III.A., by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to the docket ID numbers listed
in the table in Unit III.A. for the pesticides you are commenting on.
EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
docket without change and may be made available on-line at http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-mail. The
regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means
EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For pesticide specific information
contact: The Chemical Review Manager identified in the table in Unit
III.A. for the pesticide of interest.
    For general information contact: Kevin Costello, Pesticide Re-
evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

 A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farmworker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

 B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or

low income populations, in the development, implementation, and
enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. To help
address potential environmental justice issues, the Agency seeks
information on any groups or segments of the population who, as a
result of their location, cultural practices, or other factors, may
have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human health
impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticide(s)
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.

II. Authority

    EPA is initiating its reviews of the pesticides identified in this
document pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural Regulations
for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C. Section 3(g) of
FIFRA provides, among other things, that the registrations of
pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under FIFRA, a pesticide
product may be registered or remain registered only if it meets the
statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA section 3(c)(5).
When used in accordance with widespread and commonly recognized
practice, the pesticide product must perform its intended function
without unreasonable adverse effects on the environment; that is,
without any unreasonable risk to man or the environment, or a human
dietary risk from residues that result from the use of a pesticide in
or on food.

III. Registration Reviews

 A. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), EPA is reviewing the pesticide
registrations identified in the table in this unit to assure that they
continue to satisfy the FIFRA standard for registration--that is, they
can still be used without unreasonable adverse effects on human health
or the environment. A pesticide's registration review begins when the
Agency establishes a docket for the pesticide's registration review
case and opens the docket for public review and comment. At present,
EPA is opening registration review dockets for the cases identified in
the following table. The docket opening for formetanate hydrochloride,
which was planned for September 2010, has been postponed until December
2010.

                                   Table 1--Registration Review Dockets Opening
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                              Chemical Review Manager, Telephone
Registration Review Case Name and Number           Docket ID Number                 Number, E-mail Address
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Carbaryl (0080)                                        EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0230  Jacqueline Guerry,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copper Sulfate (0636)                                   EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0212     Kaitlin Keller,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copper Compounds, Group II (0649)                       EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0212     Kaitlin Keller,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copper Salts (4026)                                     EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0212     Kaitlin Keller,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copper oxide (4025)                                     EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0212   Rebecca von dem Hagen, (703) 305-
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cyfluthrins (7405)                                      EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0684        Yan Donovan,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fluoroacetic acid derivatives (3073)                    EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0753    K. Avivah Jakob,<PHONE_NUMBER>;
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
d-Limonene (3083)                                       EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0673        Rusty Wasem,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methomyl (0028)                                         EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0751        Yan Donovan,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oxamyl (0253)                                           EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0028         Eric Miederhoff, (703) 347-
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pyridaben (7417)                                        EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0214      Carissa Cyran,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sodium cyanide (8002)                                   EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0752    K. Avivah Jakob,<PHONE_NUMBER>;
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA is also announcing that it will not be opening a docket or
taking public comments for maneb, Mitin FF, or urea because these
pesticides are not included in any products actively registered under
FIFRA section 3. The last pesticide product registered in the US
containing maneb was canceled on April 16, 2010 (75 FR 19967), and EPA
proposed revocation of all maneb tolerances on May 26, 2010 (75 FR
29475). The last pesticide product containing Mitin FF was canceled on
July 28, 2010 (75 FR 44240). The sole pesticide product registered in
the United States containing urea was cancelled on September 3, 2010
(75 FR

54147). There are no pesticide tolerances for Mitin FF or urea.

                              Table 2--Pesticides not Subject to Registration Review
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Chemical Review Manager, Telephone
            Name of Pesticide                   Number, E-mail Address               Date of Cancellation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maneb                                        Christina Scheltema, (703) 308-                      April 16, 2010
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mitin FF                                          Kaitlin Keller, (703) 308-                       July 28, 2010
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Urea                                               Andrea Carone, (703) 308-                   September 3, 2010
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Last, EPA is announcing the availability of an amended final work
plan for the registration review of imidacloprid. The work plan was
revised to incorporate changes to the data requirements for
registration review. The revised work plan requires a 2-year field
residue study analyzing 5 commodities for pesticide residues in nectar
and pollen, rather than the repeat dose field study for pollinators
that was originally required. The imidacloprid work plan may be found
in registration review docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0844, which is available
on-line at http://regulations.gov.

 B. Docket Content

    1. Review dockets. The registration review dockets contain
information that the Agency may consider in the course of the
registration review. The Agency may include information from its files
including, but not limited to, the following information:
     An overview of the registration review case status.
     A list of current product registrations and registrants.
     Federal Register notices regarding any pending
registration actions.
     Federal Register notices regarding current or pending
tolerances.
     Risk assessments.
     Bibliographies concerning current registrations.
     Summaries of incident data.
     Any other pertinent data or information.
     Each docket contains a document summarizing what the Agency
currently knows about the pesticide case and a preliminary work plan
for anticipated data and assessment needs. Additional documents provide
more detailed information. During this public comment period, the
Agency is asking that interested persons identify any additional
information they believe the Agency should consider during the
registration reviews of these pesticides. The Agency identifies in each
docket the areas where public comment is specifically requested, though
comment in any area is welcome.
    2. Other related information. More information on these cases,
including the active ingredients for each case, may be located in the
registration review schedule on the Agency's website at http://
www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration_review/schedule.htm. Information on
the Agency's registration review program and its implementing
regulation may be seen at http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration_
review.
     3. Information submission requirements. Anyone may submit data or
information in response to this document. To be considered during a
pesticide's registration review, the submitted data or information must
meet the following requirements:
     To ensure that EPA will consider data or information
submitted, interested persons must submit the data or information
during the comment period. The Agency may, at its discretion, consider
data or information submitted at a later date.
     The data or information submitted must be presented in a
legible and useable form. For example, an English translation must
accompany any material that is not in English and a written transcript
must accompany any information submitted as an audiographic or
videographic record. Written material may be submitted in paper or
electronic form.
     Submitters must clearly identify the source of any
submitted data or information.
     Submitters may request the Agency to reconsider data or
information that the Agency rejected in a previous review. However,
submitters must explain why they believe the Agency should reconsider
the data or information in the pesticide's registration review.
    As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the registration review docket for
each pesticide case will remain publicly accessible through the
duration of the registration review process; that is, until all actions
required in the final decision on the registration review case have
been completed.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: September 9, 2010.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Program.
[FR Doc. 2010-23322 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


region facility species. orig stage year impinged. est entrained. est dummy dummy dummy dummy  999  999  999 river cayuga lamprey. spp age01 1976 10 . river cayuga silver. lamprey age01 1976 301 . river cayuga pallid. sturgeon age01 1976 10 . river cayuga shovelnose. sturgeon age01 1976 0 . river cayuga paddlefish age01 1976 19 . river cayuga longnose. gar age01 1976 181 . river cayuga shortnose. gar age01 1976 29 . river cayuga bowfin age01 1976 0 . river cayuga american. eel age01 1976 10 . river cayuga skipjack. herring age01 1976 38 . river cayuga gizzard. shad age01 1976 289,969 . river cayuga goldeye age01 1976 0 . river cayuga mooneye age01 1976 38 . river cayuga rainbow. trout age01 1976 0 . river cayuga redfin. pickerel age01 1976 0 . river cayuga minnow. spp age01 1976 10 . river cayuga carp age01 1976 95 . river cayuga silverjaw. minnow age01 1976 0 . river cayuga silvery. minnow age01 1976 19 . river cayuga speckled. chub age01 1976 48 . river cayuga silver. chub age01 1976 630 . river cayuga pugnose. shiner age01 1976 19 . river cayuga popeye. shiner age01 1976 0 . river cayuga emerald. shiner age01 1976 649 . river cayuga river. shiner age01 1976 181 . river cayuga silver. shiner age01 1976 0 . river cayuga spotfin. shiner age01 1976 190 . river cayuga sand. shiner age01 1976 206 . river cayuga topeka. shiner age01 1976 19 . river cayuga redfin. shiner age01 1976 0 . river cayuga mimic. shiner age01 1976 133 . river cayuga shiner. spp age01 1976 76 . river cayuga suckermouth. minnow age01 1976 124 . river cayuga bluntnose. minnow age01 1976 57 . river cayuga fathead. minnow age01 1976 0 . river cayuga bullhead. minnow age01 1976 86 . river cayuga creek. chub age01 1976 0 . river cayuga sucker. spp age01 1976 29 . river cayuga river. carpsucker age01 1976 729 . river cayuga highfin. carpsucker age01 1976 602 . river cayuga carpsucker. spp age01 1976 171 . river cayuga northern. hogsucker age01 1976 76 . river cayuga spotted. sucker age01 1976 0 . river cayuga smallmouth. buffalo age01 1976 19 . river cayuga silver. redhorse age01 1976 86 . river cayuga river. redhorse age01 1976 10 . river cayuga golden. redhorse age01 1976 86 . river cayuga shorthead. redhorse age01 1976 76 . river cayuga redhorse. spp age01 1976 1,150 . river cayuga catfish. spp age01 1976 0 . river cayuga bullhead. spp age01 1976 0 . river cayuga black. bullhead age01 1976 29 . river cayuga yellow. bullhead age01 1976 29 . river cayuga brown. bullhead age01 1976 10 . river cayuga channel. catfish age01 1976 5,825 . river cayuga mountain. madtom age01 1976 253 . river cayuga stonecat age01 1976 19 . river cayuga brindled. madtom age01 1976 491 . river cayuga freckled. madtom age01 1976 0 . river cayuga flathead. catfish age01 1976 735 . river cayuga white. bass age01 1976 12,633 . river cayuga sunfish. spp age01 1976 10 . river cayuga green. sunfish age01 1976 10 . river cayuga pumpkinseed age01 1976 0 . river cayuga warmouth age01 1976 86 . river cayuga lepomis. spp age01 1976 19 . river cayuga bluegill age01 1976 181 . river cayuga longear. sunfish age01 1976 95 . river cayuga spotted. bass age01 1976 67 . river cayuga smallmouth. bass age01 1976 0 . river cayuga largemouth. bass age01 1976 19 . river cayuga white. crappie age01 1976 491 . river cayuga black. crappie age01 1976 19 . river cayuga greenside. darter age01 1976 0 . river cayuga banded. darter age01 1976 10 . river cayuga logperch age01 1976 0 . river cayuga slenderhead. darter age01 1976 0 . river cayuga sauger age01 1976 10 . river cayuga freshwater. drum age01 1976 67 . river cayuga mottled. sculpin age01 1976 19 . river cayuga unknown age01 1976 0 . river cayuga freshwater. drum larvae 1976 . 2,143,110 river cayuga minnow. spp larvae 1976 . 107,857,097 river cayuga sucker. spp larvae 1976 . 4,531,014 river cayuga gizzard. shad larvae 1976 . 78,570,273 river cayuga channel. catfish larvae 1976 . 1,872,994 river cayuga flathead. catfish larvae 1976 . 4,384,922 river cayuga carp larvae 1976 . 13,068,211 river cayuga micropterus. spp larvae 1976 . 889,189 river cayuga crappie. spp larvae 1976 . 889,189 river cayuga sunfish. spp larvae 1976 . 2,960,958 river cayuga shad. spp larvae 1976 . 986,243 river cayuga silver. lamprey age01 1987 129 . river cayuga shovelnose. sturgeon age01 1987 46 . river cayuga longnose. gar age01 1987 18 . river cayuga gar. spp age01 1987 15 . river cayuga skipjack. herring age01 1987 15 . river cayuga gizzard. shad age01 1987 8,886 . river cayuga mooneye age01 1987 31 . river cayuga common. carp age01 1987 31 . river cayuga mississippi. silvery. minnowage01 1987 22 . river cayuga silver. chub age01 1987 63 . river cayuga golden. shiner age01 1987 28 . river cayuga river. shiner age01 1987 31 . river cayuga spotfin. shiner age01 1987 15 . river cayuga steelcolor. shiner age01 1987 22 . river cayuga river. carpsucker age01 1987 15 . river cayuga quillback age01 1987 52 . river cayuga smallmouth. buffalo age01 1987 15 . river cayuga golden. redhorse age01 1987 15 . river cayuga shorthead. redhorse age01 1987 260 . river cayuga black. bullhead age01 1987 15 . river cayuga channel. catfish age01 1987 5,235 . river cayuga mountain. madtom age01 1987 7 . river cayuga flathead. catfish age01 1987 214 . river cayuga white. bass age01 1987 107 . river cayuga yellow. bass age01 1987 28 . river cayuga hybrid. bass age01 1987 7 . river cayuga warmouth age01 1987 15 . river cayuga bluegill age01 1987 107 . river cayuga white. crappie age01 1987 31 . river cayuga logperch age01 1987 15 . river cayuga sauger age01 1987 31 . river cayuga freshwater. drum age01 1987 70 . river cayuga gizzard. shad larvae 1987 . 5761054 river cayuga carp larvae 1987 . 953692 river cayuga ictiobinae larvae 1987 . 360239 river cayuga cyprinidae larvae 1987 . 493557 river cayuga channel. catfish larvae 1987 . 210334 river cayuga other. spp egg 1987 . 17590883 river cayuga catostomidae larvae 1987 . 41,022 river cayuga central. stoneroller larvae 1987 . 32,817 river cayuga creek. chub larvae 1987 . 41,022 river cayuga etheostoma larvae 1987 . 41,022 river cayuga flathead. catfish larvae 1987 . 131,270 river cayuga ictaluridae larvae 1987 . 41,022 river cayuga micropterus larvae 1987 . 73,839 river cayuga mooneye larvae 1987 . 24,613 river cayuga moxostoma larvae 1987 . 41,022 river cayuga notropis. spp larvae 1987 . 32,817 river cayuga noturus. spp larvae 1987 . 41,022 river cayuga shortnose. gar larvae 1987 . 41,022 river cayuga silver. lamprey larvae 1987 . 32,817 river cayuga unknown larvae 1987 . 787,618 river cayuga white. bass larvae 1987 . 147,678 notes qc dummy dummy RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 6 lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36. 6 month period only lefer RM# 28046; pg 42 6 month period only RM# 28046; pg 42 6 month period only RM# 28046; pg 42 6 month period only RM# 28046; pg 42 6 month period only RM# 28046; pg 42 6 month period only RM# 28046; pg 42 6 month period only, not identified to spp. Extrapolated based on pg 42 & percentage composition from RM6 month period only Extrapolated based on pg 42 & percentage composition from RM6 month period only Extrapolated based on pg 42 & percentage composition from RM6 month period only Extrapolated based on pg 42 & percentage composition from RM6 month period only Extrapolated based on pg 42 & percentage composition from RM6 month period only Extrapolated based on pg 42 & percentage composition from RM6 month period only Extrapolated based on pg 42 & percentage composition from RM6 month period only Extrapolated based on pg 42 & percentage composition from RM6 month period only Extrapolated based on pg 42 & percentage composition from RM6 month period only Extrapolated based on pg 42 & percentage composition from RM6 month period only Extrapolated based on pg 42 & percentage composition from RM6 month period only Extrapolated based on pg 42 & percentage composition from RM6 month period only Extrapolated based on pg 42 & percentage composition from RM6 month period only Extrapolated based on pg 42 & percentage composition from RM6 month period only Extrapolated based on pg 42 & percentage composition from RM6 month period only date species con1. egg. dens con1. larv. dens con2. egg. dens con2. larv. dens egg. dens larv. dens 6 May 87 mooneye 0 0 0 0.3 0 0.3 6 May 87 ictiobinae 0 0 0 0.3 0 0.3 6 May 87 channel. catfish 0 0 0 0.3 0 0.3 12 May 87 unknown 29.8 0 0 0 29.8 0 21 May 87 gizzard. shad 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 21 May 87 common. carp 0 8.3 0 0 0 8.3 21 May 87 creek. chub 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 21 May 87 cyprinidae 0 0.9 0 0 0 0.9 21 May 87 moxostoma 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 21 May 87 ictiobinae 0 0.9 0 0 0 0.9 21 May 87 catostomidae 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 21 May 87 white. bass 0 0.9 0 0 0 0.9 21 May 87 micropterus 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 21 May 87 etheostoma 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 21 May 87 unknown 57.4 0 0 0 57.4 0 27 May 87 gizzard. shad 0 36.2 0 0 0 36.2 27 May 87 unknown 1.3 0.9 0 0 1.3 0.9 2 Jun 87 silver. lamprey 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.4 2 Jun 87 gizzard. shad 0 6.6 0 3.5 0 10.1 2 Jun 87 central. stoneroller 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.4 2 Jun 87 ictiobinae 0 0 0 0.7 0 0.7 2 Jun 87 micropterus 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.4 2 Jun 87 unknown 27.1 0 2.1 0.7 29.2 0.7 9 Jun 87 gizzard. shad 0 5.3 0 7.5 0 12.8 9 Jun 87 unknown 3.3 0 5.7 1.3 9 1.3 12 Jun 87 unknown 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.4 15 Jun 87 gizzard. shad 0 0 0 0.5 0 0.5 15 Jun 87 ictiobinae 0 0 0 0.9 0 0.9 15 Jun 87 unknown 0.5 0 22.2 0.5 22.7 0.5 18 Jun 87 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Jun 87 shortnose. gar 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 23 Jun 87 ictiobinae 0 1.1 0 0 0 1.1 23 Jun 87 white. bass 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 23 Jun 87 unknown 1.1 0.5 10.7 0 11.8 0.5 26 Jun 87 unknown 1.4 0 0 0 1.4 0 30 Jun 87 unknown 6.3 0 0 0 6.3 0 3 Jul 87 cyprinidae 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 3 Jul 87 ictaluridae 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 7 Jul 87 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Jul 87 channel. catfish 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.4 9 Jul 87 white. bass 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.4 14 Jul 87 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Jul 87 ictiobinae 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.4 17 Jul 87 unknown 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.4 21 Jul 87 channel. catfish 0 0 0 0.6 0 0.6 21 Jul 87 noturus. spp 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 21 Jul 87 flathead. catfish 0 1 0 0.6 0 1.6 21 Jul 87 unknown 3.9 0.5 4.6 0 8.5 0.5 24 Jul 87 cyprinidae 0 0.9 0 0 0 0.9 24 Jul 87 channel. catfish 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 24 Jul 87 unknown 4.7 0.9 0 0.4 4.7 1.3 29 Jul 87 channel. catfish 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.4 29 Jul 87 unknown 2.5 0.4 0 0 2.5 0.4 31 Jul 87 notropis. spp 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.4 31 Jul 87 cyprinidae 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.4 31 Jul 87 channel. catfish 0 0.9 0 0 0 0.9 31 Jul 87 unknown 0 0.9 0 0 0 0.9 5 Aug 87 cyprinidae 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.4 5 Aug 87 unknown 0 0.9 0.8 0 0.8 0.9 12 Aug 87 unknown 0 0 0 0.9 0 0.9 19 Aug 87 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Sep 87 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Sep 87 cyprinidae 0 0.7 0 0 0 0.7 21 Oct 87 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 source qc Sum of larv. dens species stage RM# 28046 App A HSB species Total pct. comp. other extrap. ent gizzard. shad larvae RM# 28046 App A HSB . 0 carp larvae RM# 28046 App A HSB catostomidae 0.5 2.65 41,022 ictiobinae larvae RM# 28046 App A HSB central. stoneroller 0.4 2.12 32,817 cyprinidae larvae RM# 28046 App A HSB channel. catfish 3.1 channel. catfishlarvae RM# 28046 App A HSB common. carp 8.3 other. spp larvae RM# 28046 App A HSB creek. chub 0.5 2.65 41,022 total larvae RM# 28046 App A HSB cyprinidae 3.8 RM# 28046 App A HSB etheostoma 0.5 2.65 41,022 RM# 28046 App A HSB flathead. catfish 1.6 8.47 131,270 RM# 28046 App A HSB gizzard. shad 60.1 RM# 28046 App A HSB ictaluridae 0.5 2.65 41,022 RM# 28046 App A HSB ictiobinae 4.3 RM# 28046 App A HSB micropterus 0.9 4.76 73,839 RM# 28046 App A HSB mooneye 0.3 1.59 24,613 RM# 28046 App A HSB moxostoma 0.5 2.65 41,022 RM# 28046 App A HSB notropis. spp 0.4 2.12 32,817 RM# 28046 App A HSB noturus. spp 0.5 2.65 41,022 RM# 28046 App A HSB shortnose. gar 0.5 2.65 41,022 RM# 28046 App A HSB silver. lamprey 0.4 2.12 32,817 RM# 28046 App A HSB unknown 9.6 50.79 787,618 RM# 28046 App A HSB white. bass 1.8 9.52 147,678 RM# 28046 App A HSB ( blank) RM# 28046 App A HSB Grand Total 98.5 RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB RM# 28046 App A HSB year entrained. 6. mo source 1987 5761054 RM# 28046; pg6 month period only 1987 953692 RM# 28046; pg6 month period only 1987 360239 RM# 28046; pg6 month period only 1987 493557 RM# 28046; pg6 month period only 1987 210334 RM# 28046; pg6 month period only 1987 1550623 Calculated bas6 month period only 1987 9,329,499 region facility species. orig stage year impinged. est entrained. est notes river cayuga silver. lamprey age01 1987 129 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga shovelnose. sturgeon age01 1987 46 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga longnose. gar age01 1987 18 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga gar. spp age01 1987 15 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga skipjack. herring age01 1987 15 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga gizzard. shad age01 1987 8,886 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga mooneye age01 1987 31 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga common. carp age01 1987 31 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga mississippi. silvery. minnow age01 1987 22 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga silver. chub age01 1987 63 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga golden. shiner age01 1987 28 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga river. shiner age01 1987 31 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga spotfin. shiner age01 1987 15 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga steelcolor. shiner age01 1987 22 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga river. carpsucker age01 1987 15 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga quillback age01 1987 52 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga smallmouth. buffalo age01 1987 15 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga golden. redhorse age01 1987 15 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga shorthead. redhorse age01 1987 260 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga black. bullhead age01 1987 15 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga channel. catfish age01 1987 5,235 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga mountain. madtom age01 1987 7 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga flathead. catfish age01 1987 214 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga white. bass age01 1987 107 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga yellow. bass age01 1987 28 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga hybrid. bass age01 1987 7 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga warmouth age01 1987 15 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga bluegill age01 1987 107 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga white. crappie age01 1987 31 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga logperch age01 1987 15 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga sauger age01 1987 31 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga freshwater. drum age01 1987 70 . RM# 28046; Table 12 pg 36 river cayuga gizzard. shad larvae 1987 . 5761054 RM# 28046; pg 42 river cayuga carp larvae 1987 . 953692 RM# 28046; pg 42 river cayuga ictiobinae larvae 1987 . 360239 RM# 28046; pg 42 river cayuga cyprinidae larvae 1987 . 493557 RM# 28046; pg 42 river cayuga channel. catfish larvae 1987 . 210334 RM# 28046; pg 42 river cayuga other. spp larvae 1987 . 1550623 Calculated based on RM# 28046 river cayuga other. spp eggs 1987 . 17590883 RM# 28046; pg 42 notes2 qc 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only lefer 6 month period only gage 6 month period only, nolefer Losses data for the Cayuga River Generating Station ( Indiana). Cooling water source: Wabash River Intake 316( b) Phase III A. Gage, 12/ 2/ 2003 Notes: 1976:

Impingement sampling was conducted every other day for 153 samples from April 1976 March 1977. Fish impinged on the travelling screens were identified and enumerated.

Entrainment sampling was conducted weekly from April Oct 1976 for a total of 99 sampling periods. Samples were taken from the circulating water lines. Impingent totals do not match those presented in Table 6. Could not find typo. 1987:

Impingement sampling was conducted weekly for 26 samples from May Oct 1987. Fish impinged on the travelling screens were identified and enumerated.

Entrainment sampling was conducted from May Oct 1987 for a total of 29 sampling periods. Samples were taken from the circulating water lines.

1987 losses represent 6 months only. Calculated estimates for additional species using 6 month estimate for total larvae ( pg 42) & percentage composition of species from RM# 28046 App A. Please check entrainmt calculation methods.

Needs additional data entry QC for worksheet " ent. 1987".

QC Imp. Total on losses page does not agree with value in documents, but I cannot find a typo. Imp. Total on 1987 page does not agree with value in documents, but I cannot find a typo. M. Lefer 12/ 8/ 03.

QCd ent. 1987 on 1/ 23 HSB


  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1

Mr. Corey Childs

General Manager

J. L. French Corporation

20 Prestwick Drive

Glasgow, Kentucky 42141

Dear Mr. Childs:

	Thank you for your efforts in assisting with the March 18, 2010, site
visit by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and RTI personnel to
the J. L. French facility in Glasgow, Kentucky. We appreciate the time
that you and other representatives at the J. L. French Corporation set
aside for discussing and showing your manufacturing process.

	Enclosed is a draft of the trip report (Enclosure 1) that has been
prepared based on the information obtained during our site visit. We
would appreciate your reviewing the report for any errors or omissions.
You may return the enclosed copy of the report with your written
comments. Since this report will eventually become a part of the public
record, we want to portray your operations as accurately as possible. A
copy of the final version of the report incorporating your comments will
be sent to you for your records.

	The custody receipt for the trip report is also enclosed (Enclosure 2).
Please sign and date the form to acknowledge receipt of the report and
return a copy of the form to:

Mr. Roberto Morales; U.S. EPA Mailroom (C404-02); U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency;

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; 109 T.W. Alexander Drive;
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.

	If you believe that disclosure of any specific information contained in
the trip report would reveal trade secrets or other confidential
information, you should clearly identify the specific information.
Please do not label the entire report as “confidential” if only
certain portions consist of trade secret information. If the EPA
determines that there is a need to disclose such information, we will
need, at that time, the following to support your claim:

	1. Measures taken by the J. L. French Corporation to guard against
undesired disclosure of the specific information to others;

	2. The extent to which the specific information has been disclosed to
others and the precautions taken in connection therewith;

	3. Pertinent confidentiality determinations, if any, by other Federal
agencies (furnish a copy of any such determination, or reference to it,
if available); and

	4. Whether the J. L. French Corporation asserts that disclosure of the
specific information would be likely to result in substantial harmful
effects on the J. L. French Corporation's competitive position, and, if
so, what those harmful effects would be, why they should be viewed as
substantial, and an explanation of the causal relationship between
disclosure and such harmful effects.

	Any specific information subsequently determined to constitute a trade
secret will be protected under 18 U.S.C. 1905. If no claim of
confidentiality accompanies the information when it is received by EPA,
it may be made available to the public by EPA without further notice (40
CFR Part 2.203, September 1, 1976). Any specific information
subsequently determined to constitute a trade secret will be protected
under 18 U.S.C. 1905. However, all emissions data will be available to
the public. A clarification of the information EPA considers to be
emissions data is contained in Enclosure 3.

	We respectfully request that you submit your review comments on the
trip report by August 26, 2010. If you concur with the information
contained in the report, we would appreciate a letter to that effect. In
addition, please indicate in your letter the specific parts of the
report, if any, that the J. L. French Corporation considers to be
confidential. If we do not receive a response by August 26, 2010, the
report will be considered non-confidential and accurate.

	Thank you for your cooperation. The information supplied by the J. L.
French Corporation will be most helpful in our study. If you have any
questions, please call Ms. Rochelle Boyd of my staff at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or Mr. David Green at RTI at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

	Sincerely,

Susan Fairchild

Group Leader

Metals and Minerals Group

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

3 Enclosures

OAQPS/SPPD/MMG:RBoyd D243-02, 541-1390

(RTI/DGreen/316-3412/7/22/10)