PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request Environmental Protection Agency / Office of Policy and Reinvention 2. OMB control number b. X None a__ __ __ __  __ __ __ __ 2010 3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. x New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. G Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. x Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes x No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. x Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title Valuing Inland Water Quality Improvements 8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) EPA ICR No. 1914.01 9. Keywords Environmental protection, water pollution control 10. Abstract This research survey attempts to determine the value of inland surface water quality improvements to households in the United States. This is expected to provide valuable research data and inputs into future Economic Analyses prepared by EPA under EO 12866. The researchers plan to recruit voluntary subjects randomly across the United States through telephone recruiting. Subjects will be asked to complete a computer survey from a disk, which will be mailed to them. The researchers intend to administer the survey to 2,800 persons in a nationwide sample.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. P Individuals or households d. Farms b. Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. P Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. G Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 2,800 b. Total annual responses 2,800 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 100 % c. Total hours requested 3,150 d. Current OMB inventory 0 e. Difference 3,150 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 3,150 2. Adjustment 0 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars) a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs $ 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) $ 0 c. Total annualized cost requested $ 0 d. Current OMB inventory $ 0 e. Difference $ 0 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change $ 0 2. Adjustment $ 0 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. P Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. __ Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. Q Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. X Reporting 1. Q On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. Q Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. X Other ( describe) One time 17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods? x Yes Q No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Alan Carlin Phone: 202 260 5499 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( I) Why the information is being collected' ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( I) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Environmental Information Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95 Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions 5 CFR 1320.9 reads " As part of the agency submission to OMB of a proposed collection of information, the agency ( through the head of the agency, the Senior Official or their designee) shall certify ( and provide a record supporting such certification) that the proposed collection of information

"( a) is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including that the information to be collected will have practical utility;

"( b) is not unnecessarily duplicative of information otherwise reasonably accessible to the agency;

"( c) reduces to the extent practicable and appropriate the burden on persons who shall provide information to or for the agency, including with respect to small entities, as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U. S. C § 601( 6)), the use of such techniques as:

"( 1) establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to those who are to respond; "( 2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements; or collection of information , or any part thereof; "( 3) an exemption from coverage of the collection of information, or any part thereof;

"( d) is written using plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology and is understandable to those who are to respond;

"( e) is to be implemented in ways consistent and compatible, to the maximum extent practicable, with the existing reporting and recordkeeping practices of those who are to respond;

"( f) indicates for each recordkeeping requirement the length of time persons are required to maintain the records specified;

"( g) informs potential respondents of the information called for under § 1320.8( b)( 3); [ see below]

"( h) has been developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected, including the processing of the information in a manner which shall enhance, where appropriate, the utility of the information to agencies and the public;

"( I) uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology appropriate to the purpose for which the information is to be collected; and "( j) to the maximum extent practicable, uses appropriate information technology to reduce burden and improve data quality, agency efficiency and responsiveness to the public."

NOTE: 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3) requires that each collection of information:

"( 3) informs and provides reasonable notice to the potential persons to whom the collection of information is addressed of: "( I) the reasons the information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( ii) the way such information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( iii) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the average burden of the collection ( together with a request that the public direct to the agency any comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden); "( iv) whether responses to the collection of information are voluntary, required to obtain or retain a benefit ( citing authority), or mandatory ( citing authority); "( v) the nature and extent of confidentiality to be provided, if any ( citing authority); and "( vi) the fact that any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number."

OMB 83 I ( Instructions) 10/ 95


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 55855]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22303]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2012-0027; OMB No. 1660-0054]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request, Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program-Grant
Application Supplemental Information

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites
the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity
to comment on a revision of a currently approved collection. In
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice seeks
comments concerning grant application information necessary to assess
the needs and benefits of applicants for the Assistance to Firefighters
Grant Program.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 13, 2012.

ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate submissions to the docket, please use
only one of the following means to submit comments:
    (1) Online. Submit comments at www.regulations.gov under Docket ID
FEMA-2012-0027. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    (2) Mail. Submit written comments to Docket Manager, Office of
Chief Counsel, DHS/FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Room 835, Washington, DC
20472-3100.
    (3) Facsimile. Submit comments to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    All submissions received must include the agency name and Docket
ID. Regardless of the method used for submitting comments or material,
all submissions will be posted, without change, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov, and will include any
personal information you provide. Therefore, submitting this
information makes it public. You may wish to read the Privacy Act
notice that is available via the link in the footer of
www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sabrina R. Vaughn, Management/Program
Analyst, Grant Program Directorate,<PHONE_NUMBER>. You may contact the
Records Management Division for copies of the proposed collection of
information at facsimile number<PHONE_NUMBER> or email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Information sought under this submission
will comprise of applications for Assistance to Firefighters Grant
Program (AFG) and Fire Prevention and Safety (FPS) grants. The
authorizing legislation allows FEMA to fund fire department activities.
The authority for AFG and FPS is derived from the Federal Fire
Protection and Control Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229 et seq.), as
amended. The information collected through the program's application is
the minimum necessary to evaluate grant applications and is necessary
for FEMA to comply with mandates delineated in AFG laws.

Collection of Information

    Title: Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program-Grant Application
Supplemental Information.
    Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved
collection.
    OMB Number: OMB No. 1660-0054.
    FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 080-2, AFG Application (General Questions and
Narrative); FEMA Form 080-2a, Activity Specific Questions for AFG
Vehicle Applicants; FEMA Form 080-2b, Activity Specific Questions for
AFG Operations and Safety Applications; FEMA Form 080-3, Activity
Specific Questions for Fire Prevention and Safety Applicants; FEMA Form
080-3a, Fire Prevention and Safety; and FEMA Form 080-3b, Research and
Development.
    Abstract: The FEMA forms for this collection are used to
objectively evaluate each of the anticipated applicants to determine
which applicants' submission in each of the AFG activities are close to
the established program priorities. FEMA also uses the information to
determine eligibility and whether the proposed use of funds meets the
requirements and intent of AFG legislation.
    Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal Government, and Not-for-
profit institutions.
    Number of Respondents: 48,500.
    Number of Responses: 48,500.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 212,975.
    Estimated Cost: There are no recordkeeping, capital, start-up or
maintenance costs associated with this information collection.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

    Dated: September 5, 2012.
Charlene D. Myrthil,
Director, Records Management Division, Mission Support Bureau, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2012-22303 Filed 9-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-78-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 72 (Monday, April 15, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22170-22172]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07500]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-1148; Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-039-AD;
Amendment 39-17405; AD 2013-07-01]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Diamond
Aircraft Industries GmbH Models DA 42, DA 42 M-NG, and DA 42NG
airplanes. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country
to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as overextension of the main
landing gear (MLG) shock absorber that could lead to the MLG jamming in
the gear bay and result in damage to the aircraft or occupant injury.
We are issuing this AD to require actions to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective May 20, 2013.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of May 20, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Diamond
Aircraft Industries GmbH, N.A. Otto-Stra[szlig]e 5, A-2700 Wiener
Neustadt, Austria, telephone: +43 2622 26700; fax: +43 2622 26780;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.diamond-air.at. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on October 29, 2012 (77
FR 65503). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    An incident was reported where a Diamond DA 42 experienced main
landing gear (MLG) extension problems during approach, with the left
hand (LH) MLG not down. An uneventful landing was made with minor
damage to the aeroplane and no injuries to occupants.
    Subsequent investigation results showed that the affected MLG
leg shock absorber, P/N D60-3277-10-00, had overextended, resulting
in the MLG being jammed in the gear bay. The overextension had been
caused by a retaining nut in the MLG shock absorber which had
loosened itself during operation.
    This condition, if not corrected, could inhibit proper extension
of the MLG, possibly resulting in damage to the aeroplane and injury
to occupants.
    Prompted by the reported event, Diamond Aircraft Industries
(DAI) published Recommended Service Bulletin (RSB) 42-089/RSB 42NG-
017 which includes Working Instruction (WI) WI-RSB-089/WI-RSB 42NG-
017 (published as a single document) to recommend operators to
modify the affected dampers to P/N D60-3277-10-00--01 standard,
which incorporates installation of a new retaining nut and a new
seal system for the MLG damper that is more durable and can
withstand a greater temperature range.
    Since that RSB was issued, further analysis has shown that the
risk of a MLG failing to extend is greater than was initially
determined. Consequently, DAI issued Mandatory Service Bulletin MSB
42-095/MSB 42NG-026 to alert aeroplane owners and operators
accordingly. The new MSB contains the same instructions as the
earlier RSB, but is no longer `at owner's discretion'.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires modification
of the affected MLG leg shock absorber, P/N D60-3277-10-00. This AD
also prohibits installation of unmodified P/N D60-3277-10-00 MLG leg
shock absorbers.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (77 FR 65503, October 29,
2012) or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed with minor
editorial changes. Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH provided new
service information that added marking instructions to annotate the
part change and modification. The work-hours to mark two parts using
indelible ink followed with clear coating would be very minimal and not
impact the estimated cost of compliance. We have determined that these
minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (77 FR 65503, October 29, 2012) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 65503, October 29, 2012).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 175 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $115 per product.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the AD on U.S.
operators to be $49,875, or $285 per product.
    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will

not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (77 FR 65503, October 29,
2012), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone (800)
647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2013-07-01 Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH: Amendment 39-17405;
Docket No. FAA-2012-1148; Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-039-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective May 20, 2013

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Models DA
42, DA 42 M-NG, and DA 42 NG airplanes, all serial numbers,
certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 32: Landing
Gear.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as overextension of
the MLG shock absorber. We are issuing this AD to prevent the MLG
jamming in the gear bay, which could result in damage to the
aircraft or occupant injury.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) Within the next 200 hours time-in-service (TIS) after May
20, 2013 (the effective date of this AD) or within the next 12
months after May 20, 2013 (the effective date of this AD), whichever
occurs first, do either (i) or (ii) as follows:
    (i) Modify the left hand (LH) and right hand (RH) MLG leg shock
absorbers P/N D60-3277-10-00 following either:
    (A) The Instructions section of Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH
Work Instruction WI-MSB 42-095, MSB 42NG-026, Revision 1, dated
February 5, 2013, and the Accomplishment/Instructions of Diamond
Aircraft Industries GmbH Mandatory Service Bulletin MSB 42-095, MSB
42NG-026, dated November 11, 2011; or
    (B) The Instructions section of Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH
Work Instruction WI-RSB 42-089, WI-RSB 42NG-017, Revision 2, dated
February 12, 2013, and the Accomplishment/Instructions of Diamond
Aircraft Industries GmbH Recommended Service Bulletin RSB 42 089/1,
RSB 42NG-017/1, dated April 19, 2011.
    (ii) Replace each MLG leg shock absorber P/N D60-3277-10-00 with
a modified unit P/N D60-3277-10-00--01, following, as applicable:
the Instructions section of Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Work
Instruction WI-RSB 42-089, WI-RSB 42NG-017, Revision 2, dated
February 12, 2013, and Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Recommended
Service Bulletin RSB 42 089/1, RSB 42NG-017/1, dated April 19, 2011.
    (2) After May 20, 2013 (the effective date of this AD), do not
install an MLG leg shock absorber P/N D60-3277-10-00 on the
airplane, unless the shock absorber has been modified following the
instructions in either paragraph (f)(1)(i)(A) or (f)(1(i)(B) of this
AD.

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal
inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

(h) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.:
2012-0174, dated September 4, 2012, for related information.

(i) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Mandatory Service Bulletin
MSB 42-095, MSB 42NG-026, dated November 11, 2011;
    (ii) Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Recommended Service
Bulletin RSB 42-089/1, RSB 42NG-017/1, dated April 19, 2011;
    (iii) Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Work Instruction WI-MSB
42-095, MSB 42NG-026, Revision 1, dated February 5, 2013; and
    (iv) Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Work Instruction WI-RSB
42-089, WI-RSB 42NG-017, Revision 2, dated February 12, 2013.
    (3) For Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH service information
identified in this AD, contact Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH,
N.A. Otto-Stra[szlig]e 5, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria,
telephone: +43 2622 26700; fax: +43

2622 26780; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.diamond-air.at.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 22, 2013.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-07500 Filed 4-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P