[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23484-23487]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09860]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0216]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation; Suncoast Super Boat Grand Prix; Gulf of
Mexico, Sarasota, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to amend a special local
regulation on the waters of the Gulf of Mexico in the vicinity of
Sarasota, Florida during the Suncoast Super Boat Grand Prix. The event
is scheduled to take place annually on the first Friday, Saturday, and
Sunday of July from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. The proposed amendment to the
special local regulation is necessary to protect the safety of race
participants, participant vessels, spectators, and the general public
on the navigable waters of the United States during the event. The
special local regulation would restrict vessel traffic in the Gulf of
Mexico near Sarasota, Florida. It would establish the following three
areas: A race area, where all persons and vessels, except those persons
and vessels participating in the high speed boat races, are prohibited
from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within; a
spectator area, where all vessels must be anchored or operate at No
Wake Speed; and an enforcement area where designated representatives
may control vessel traffic as determined by prevailing conditions.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 11, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade Brett S. Sillman, Sector St.
Petersburg Prevention Department, Coast Guard; telephone (813) 228-
2191, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2015-0216 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit

comments by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and may change the rule based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2015-0216 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    We do not plan to hold a public meeting, but you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

B. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is proposing to amend the special local regulation
on the waters of the Gulf of Mexico in the vicinity of Sarasota,
Florida during the Suncoast Super Boat Grand Prix. The event is
scheduled to take place the first Friday, Saturday, and Sunday in July
from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. This proposed rule is necessary to protect the
safety of race participants, participant vessels, spectators, and the
general public on the navigable waters of the United States during the
event.

C. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for the proposed rule is the Coast Guard's
authority to establish special local regulations: 33 U.S.C. 1233 and 33
CFR 1.05-1.
    The purpose of the proposed rule is to provide for the safety of
life on navigable waters of the United States during the Suncoast Super
Boat Grand Prix.

D. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    This proposed rule is necessary to amend a special local regulation
that will encompass certain waters of the Gulf of Mexico in Sarasota,
Florida. The proposed special local regulation would be enforced
annually during the first Friday, Saturday, and Sunday of July from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. The proposed special local regulations will establish
the following three areas:
     A race area, where all persons and vessels, except those
persons and vessels participating in the high speed boat races, are
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within;
     A spectator area, where all vessels must be anchored or
operate at No Wake Speed; and
     An enforcement area where designated representatives may
control vessel traffic as determined by the prevailing conditions.

The enforcement area encompasses both the race area and the spectator
area.

    Persons and vessels may request authorization to enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the race area or enforcement area
by contacting the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg by telephone at
(727) 824-7506, or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel
16. If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the race area or enforcement area is granted by the Captain of
the Port St. Petersburg or a designated representative, all persons and
vessels receiving such authorization must comply with the instructions
of the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a designated
representative.

E. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    The economic impact of this proposed rule is not significant for
the following reasons: The special local regulations would be enforced
for only seven hours a day for three days; although persons and vessels
are prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the race area or enforcement area without
authorization from the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a
designated representative, they may operate in the surrounding area
during the enforcement period; persons and vessels may still enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the race area and
enforcement area if authorized by the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg or a designated representative; and the Coast Guard would
provide advance notification of the special local regulations to the
local maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice
to Mariners and/or on-scene designate representatives.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    The impact on small entities of this proposed rule is not
significant for the following reasons: The special local regulations
would be enforced for only seven hours a day for three days; although
persons and vessels are prohibited from entering, transiting through,
anchoring in, or remaining within the race area or enforcement area
without authorization from the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a
designated representative, they may operate in the surrounding area
during the enforcement period; persons and vessels may still enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the race area and
enforcement area if authorized by the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg or a designated representative; and the Coast Guard would
provide advance notification of the special local regulations to the
local maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice
to Mariners and/or on-scene designate representatives.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a

significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

 6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category
of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1233, 33 CFR 1.05-1, Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1(II)(70).

0
2. Revise Sec.  100.720 to read as follows:

Sec.  100.720  Special Local Regulations; Suncoast Super Boat Grand
Prix, Gulf of Mexico; Sarasota, FL.

    (a) Regulated areas. The following regulated areas are established
as special local regulations. All coordinates are North American Datum
1983.
    (1) Race area. All waters of the Gulf of Mexico encompassed by a
line connecting the following points: 27[deg]18.19' N., 82[deg]34.29'
W., thence to 27[deg]17.42' N., 82[deg]35.00' W., thence to
27[deg]18.61' N., 82[deg]36.59' W., thence to 27[deg]19.58' N.,
82[deg]35.54' W., thence back to the original point 27[deg]18.19' N.,
82[deg]34.29' W.
    (2) Enforcement area. All waters of the Gulf of Mexico encompassed
by a line connecting the following points: 27[deg]17.87' N.,
82[deg]33.93' W., thence to position 27[deg]16.61' N., 82[deg]34.69'
W., thence to position 27[deg]18.53' N., 82[deg]37.52' W., thence to
position 27[deg]20.04' N., 82[deg]35.76' W., thence back to the
original position 27[deg]17.87' N., 82[deg]33.93' W.
    (3) Spectator area. All waters of within the enforcement area that
are more than 500 yards from the race area.
    (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the

Captain of the Port St. Petersburg in the enforcement of the regulated
areas.
    (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
race area unless an authorized race participant.
    (2) Designated representatives may control vessel traffic
throughout the enforcement area as determined by the prevailing
conditions.
    (3) All vessels in the spectator area are to be anchored or operate
at a No Wake Speed. On-scene designated representatives will direct
spectator vessels to the spectator area.
    (4) All vessel traffic not involved with the event shall enter and
exit Sarasota Bay via Big Sarasota Pass and stay clear of the
enforcement area.
    (5) New Pass will be closed to all inbound and outbound vessel
traffic at the COLREGS Demarcation Line. Vessels are allowed to utilize
New Pass to access all areas inland of the Demarcation Line via
Sarasota Bay. New Pass may be opened at the discretion of the Captain
of the Port.
    (6) Persons and vessels may request authorization to enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated areas by contacting
the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16. If
authorization is granted by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a
designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port St. Petersburg or a designated representative.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced annually the
first Friday, Saturday, and Sunday of July from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. EDT
daily.

    Dated: April 2, 2015.
G.D. Case,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port St. Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2015-09860 Filed 4-27-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: December 16, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 242)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 76322-76324]
[DOCID:fr16de08-23]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 67

[Docket No. FEMA-B-1025]

Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on the proposed Base (1 percent annual-
chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) and proposed BFE modifications for the
communities listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to
seek general information and comment regarding the proposed regulatory
flood elevations for the reach described by the downstream and upstream
locations in the table below. The BFEs and modified BFEs are a part of
the floodplain management measures that the community is required
either to adopt or show evidence of having in effect in order to
qualify or remain qualified for participation in the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, these elevations, once
finalized, will be used by insurance agents, and others to calculate
appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and the
contents in those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before March 16, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The corresponding preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map
(FIRM) for the proposed BFEs for each community are available for
inspection at the community's map repository. The respective addresses
are listed in the table below.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-1025, to
William R. Blanton, Jr., Chief, Engineering Management Branch,
Mitigation Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (e-mail)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William R. Blanton, Jr., Chief,
Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472,
(202) 646-3151 or (e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) proposes to make determinations of BFEs and modified BFEs for
each community listed below, in accordance with section 110 of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR
67.4(a).
    These proposed BFEs and modified BFEs, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own, or pursuant to policies established
by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These proposed
elevations are used to meet the floodplain management requirements of
the NFIP and are also used to calculate the appropriate flood insurance
premium rates for new buildings built after these elevations are made
final, and for the contents in these buildings.
    Comments on any aspect of the Flood Insurance Study and FIRM, other
than the proposed BFEs, will be considered. A letter acknowledging
receipt of any comments will not be sent.
    Administrative Procedure Act Statement. This matter is not a
rulemaking governed by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.
553. FEMA publishes flood elevation determinations for notice and
comment; however, they are governed by the Flood Disaster Protection
Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and the National Flood Insurance Act of
1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., and do not fall under the APA.
    National Environmental Policy Act. This proposed rule is
categorically excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR part 10,
Environmental Consideration. An environmental impact assessment has not
been prepared.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood elevation determinations are
not within the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
    Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. This
proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under the criteria
of section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as amended.
    Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This proposed rule involves no
policies that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
    Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This proposed rule
meets the applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67

    Administrative practice and procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.

    Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 67--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 67 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp., p. 376.

Sec.  67.4  [Amended]

    2. The tables published under the authority of Sec.  67.4 are
proposed to be amended as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                * Elevation in feet
                                                                                (NGVD)  + Elevation in
                                                                                feet (NAVD)
            State                 City/town/        Source of          Location **         Depth in feet above
                                    county           flooding                                    ground
                                                                                -------------------------
                                                                                Existing     Modified
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Town of Sparta, New York
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New York.....................  Town of Sparta..  Canaseraga       Just upstream of             None        * 576
                                                  Creek.           State Route 258/
                                                                   Flats Road.
                                                                  Approximately 1.2            None        * 614
                                                                   miles upstream of
                                                                   White Bridge Road.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.

** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to William R. Blanton, Jr., Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

Town of Sparta
Maps are available for inspection at 8302 Kysorville-Byersville Road, Dansville, NY 14437.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                     * Elevation in feet
                                                                     (NGVD)  + Elevation
                                                                       in feet (NAVD)
         Flooding source(s)              Location of referenced       Depth in    Communities affected
                                              elevation **            feet above ground
                                                                   ----------------------
                                                                    Effective   Modified
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Powell County, Kentucky, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Red River (at City of Stanton)......  Approximately 800 feet             None       +641  Unincorporated Areas
                                       downstream Judy Creek.                              of Powell County.
                                      Approximately 5,400 feet           None       +651
                                       upstream Hatcher Creek.
Red River (at Clay City)............  Approximately 3,900 feet           None       +623  Unincorporated Areas
                                       downstream Bert T Combs-                            of Powell County.
                                       Mountain Parkway.
                                      Approximately 5,800 feet           None       +632
                                       downstream Hatton Creek.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.

** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to William R. Blanton, Jr., Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

                                      Unincorporated Areas of Powell County

Maps are available for inspection at 525 Washington Street, Stanton, KY 40380.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Okmulgee County, Oklahoma, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duck Creek..........................  Approximately 3,950 feet           None       +622  Unincorporated Areas
                                       downstream from S. Yale                             of Okmulgee County,
                                       Avenue.                                             Town of Liberty.
                                      Approximately 1,377 feet           None       +642
                                       upstream from Lewis Avenue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.

** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to William R. Blanton, Jr., Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

Town of Liberty
Maps are available for inspection at 719 E. 8th St., Okmulgee, OK 74447.

                                     Unincorporated Areas of Okmulgee County
Maps are available for inspection at 719 E. 8th St., Okmulgee, OK 74447.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: December 5, 2008.
Michael K. Buckley,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Mitigation Directorate, Department of
Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-29765 Filed 12-15-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 184 (Monday, September 23, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 49723]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20502]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14944-000]

Pumped Hydro Storage, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To
Intervene, and Competing Applications

    On May 10, 2019, Pumped Hydro Storage, LLC, filed an application
for a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power
Act (FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of a pumped storage
project on the Little Colorado River in Coconino County, Arizona. On
August 1, 2019, the applicant filed a revised application for the
project to address Commission staff's June 19, 2019 comments. The sole
purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the permit
holder priority to file a license application during the permit term. A
preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder to perform any
land-disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands or waters
owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed Navajo Nation Little Colorado River Pumped Storage
Project would consist of the following: (1) A new 200-foot-high, 3,200-
foot-long upper dam and reservoir; (2) a new 150-foot-high, 1,000-foot-
long lower dam and reservoir; (3) eight 400-megawatt, turbine-generator
units, for a total installed capacity of 3,200 megawatts; (4) two new
22-mile-long, 500-kilovolt transmission lines from the powerhouse to an
existing grid interconnection point; and (5) appurtenant facilities.
The proposed project would have an average annual generation of 8,500
gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Steve Irwin, Pumped Hydro Storage, LLC, 6514 S
41st Lane, Phoenix, AZ 85041; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Tim Konnert; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief
comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the
eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. DATED:
September 17, 2019. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or
(202) 502-8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper
copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should
include docket number P-14994-000.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the eLibrary link of the
Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-14994) in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: September 17, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-20502 Filed 9-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 19, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11611-11612]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03778]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 16 and 112

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0921]
RIN 0910-AG35

Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of
Produce for Human Consumption; Extension of Comment Period for
Information Collection Provisions

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period for information
collection provisions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or ``we'') is extending
the comment period for the information collection provisions of the
proposed rule on ``Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and
Holding of Produce for Human Consumption'' that appeared in the Federal
Register of January 16, 2013. In the preamble to the proposed rule, FDA
requested comments on the information collection provisions that are
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. We are taking this action in
response to requests for an extension to allow interested persons
additional time to submit comments on the information collection
provisions associated with the rule.

DATES: The comment period for the proposed rule published January 16,
2013 (78 FR 3504), is extended. Submit

either electronic or written comments by May 16, 2013.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>All
comments should be identified with the title ``Standards for the
Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce for Human
Consumption.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Domini Bean, Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Picard Dr., PI50-400T,
Rockville, MD 20850<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In the Federal Register of January 16, 2013 (78 FR 3504), FDA
published a proposed rule entitled ``Standards for the Growing,
Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce for Human Consumption''
with a 120-day comment period on the provisions of the proposed rule
and a 30-day comment period on the information collection provisions
that are subject to review by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). Comments on the provisions of the rule and
on the information collection provisions will inform FDA's rulemaking
to establish science-based minimum standards for the safe growing,
harvesting, packing, and holding of produce for human consumption to
minimize the risk of serious adverse health consequences or death from
consumption of contaminated produce.
    We have received a request for a 90-day extension of the comment
period for the information collection provisions of the proposed rule.
The request conveyed concern that the current 30-day comment period
does not allow sufficient time to provide meaningful input on the
information collection provisions submitted to OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
    We have considered the request and are extending the comment period
for the information collection for 90 days, until May 16, 2013. We
believe that a 90-day extension allows adequate time for interested
persons to submit comments without significantly delaying rulemaking on
these important issues. A 90-day extension also will make the comment
period for the information collection provisions the same as the
comment period for the provisions of the proposed rule.

II. Request for Comments

    Interested persons may either submit electronic comments regarding
the information collection to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or fax
written comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>. All comments should be
identified with the title ``Standards for the Growing, Harvesting,
Packing, and Holding of Produce for Human Consumption.''

    Dated: February 13, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-03778 Filed 2-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 102 (Friday, May 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25778-25779]
[FR Doc No: E9-12441]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59964, File No. SR-MSRB-2009-03]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the
Establishment of a Pilot Phase of Its Upcoming Continuing Disclosure
Service of the Electronic Municipal Market Access System (EMMA[supreg])

May 21, 2009.
    On March 25, 2009, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board
(``MSRB''), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'' or ``SEC''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to establish a pilot phase (the
``continuing disclosure pilot'') of the continuing disclosure service
of the MSRB's Electronic Municipal Market Access system (``EMMA''). The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on April 6, 2009.\3\ The Commission received one comment

letter about the proposed rule change.\4\ On May 8, 2009 and May 18,
2009, the MSRB filed responses to the comment letters.\5\ This order
approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59643 (Mar. 27,
2009), 74 FR 15530 (Apr. 6, 2009) (``Commission's Notice'').
    \4\ See letter from Douglas Adamson, Executive Vice President,
Technical Services Division, American Bankers Association (``ABA''),
dated April 24, 2009.
    \5\ See letters from Ernesto A. Lanza, General Counsel, MSRB, to
Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, SEC, dated May 8, 2009 (``Response
Letter I'') and May 18, 2009 (``Response Letter II'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change would establish the continuing disclosure
pilot of the continuing disclosure service of the MSRB's EMMA system.
The continuing disclosure pilot would receive electronic submissions
of, and would make publicly available on the Internet, continuing
disclosure documents and related information voluntarily submitted by
issuers, obligated persons and their agents. The MSRB originally
requested approval of the continuing disclosure pilot to commence
operation on May 11, 2009, or such later date as may be announced by
the MSRB in a notice published on the MSRB Web site, which date shall
be no later than 30 days after Commission approval of the proposed rule
change. In addition, the MSRB requested approval of the continuing
disclosure pilot for a period ending on July 1, 2009.\6\ The MSRB has
now requested approval of this proposed rule change by no later than
May 22, 2009, so that the MSRB may commence operation of the pilot
continuing disclosure service on June 1, 2009.\7\ A full description of
the proposal is contained in the Commission's Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Commission has previously approved the establishment of
the continuing disclosure service of EMMA, which will commence
operation on July 1, 2009. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
59061 (December 5, 2008), 73 FR 75778 (December 12, 2008) (File No.
SR-MSRB-2008-05) (approving the continuing disclosure service of
EMMA with an effective date of July 1, 2009). The EMMA continuing
disclosure service is designed to commence operation simultaneously
with the effectiveness of certain amendments to Exchange Act Rule
15c2-12 adopted by the Commission. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 59062 (December 5, 2008), 73 FR 76104 (December 15,
2008) (adopting amendments to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-12).
    \7\ See Response Letter II, supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As previously noted, the Commission received one comment letter
relating to the proposed rule change.\8\ The ABA expressed concerns
regarding certain legal issues relating to the protection of its
intellectual property and contractual rights in the CUSIP database (the
``Database'') that it states have not yet been resolved. The ABA noted
that it was the owner of the Database, which is administered by the
CUSIP Service Bureau (``CSB''), as its exclusive licensee, and believed
it was critical that these legal issues be resolved before the MSRB be
allowed to move forward with the proposed expansion and full
implementation of EMMA. It further requested that the operation of the
EMMA Web site incorporate a variety of protections with respect to its
intellectual property rights, including compliance with CSB's current
licensing practices, permissible use guidelines, appropriate copyright
notices and adequate security.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See supra note 4.
    \9\ See letter from the ABA, supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In response to the ABA's concerns, the MSRB and the CSB, as the
ABA's exclusive licensee, have entered into a memorandum of
understanding dated May 15, 2009 (the ``MOU'') in which CSB expressly
permits use of the CUSIP database for purposes, among other things, of
displaying information on the MSRB's EMMA public Web portal and for
inclusion in data disseminated by the MSRB to subscribers of the EMMA
data feed. The MSRB has agreed in the MOU to provide certain safeguards
with respect to the ABA's intellectual property and contractual rights
of the ABA in the CUSIP database.\10\ The Commission believes that the
MSRB has taken sufficient action to ensure that all necessary
arrangements will be in place in order to operate the continuing
disclosure pilot as anticipated by the implementation date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Response Letter II, supra note 5. The MSRB stated that
this agreement would expand and reposition existing language on the
EMMA Web site to ensure that users of the EMMA Web site have a
fuller understanding of the sources of information displayed on the
EMMA Web site and of the proprietary rights of third parties
(including but not limited to the proprietary rights of the ABA in
the Database) in certain displayed data elements. Such language
would advise users of the limitations on their use or re-use of any
proprietary information accessed on the EMMA Web site, and users
would be required to acknowledge such limitations before being
provided access to any portion of the Database. Additional systemic
and reporting mechanisms would be implemented to further protect
against inappropriate use of the Database. See Response Letter I,
supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has carefully considered the proposed rule change,
the comment letter received, and the MSRB's responses to the comment
letter and finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to the MSRB \11\ and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 15B(b)(2)(C) of the Act \12\ and the rules and regulations
thereunder. Section 15B(b)(2)(C) of the Act requires, among other
things, that the MSRB's rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in municipal
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market in municipal securities, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.\13\ In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Act because the EMMA continuing disclosure service, including the pilot
phase thereof, would serve as an additional mechanism by which the MSRB
works toward removing impediments to and helping to perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market in municipal securities. The pilot
phase would be an important transitional step toward ensuring the
effective and efficient operation of the permanent EMMA continuing
disclosure service upon launch on July 1, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission
notes that it has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-4(b)(2)(C).
    \13\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\14\ that the proposed rule change (SR-MSRB-2009-03), be, and it
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12441 Filed 5-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 93 (Wednesday, May 13, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28646-28647]
[FR Doc No: 2020-10266]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2020-0185]

Information Collection Request to Office of Management and
Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625-0102

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Sixty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting an extension of
its approval for the following collection of information: 1625-0102,
National Response Resource Inventory; without change. Our ICR describes
the information we seek to collect from the public. Before submitting
this ICR to OIRA, the Coast Guard is inviting comments as described
below.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before July 13, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2020-0185] to the Coast Guard using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public
participation and

request for comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for further instructions on submitting comments.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available
from: Commandant (CG-6P), Attn: Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, U.S.
Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE, STOP 7710,
Washington, DC 20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.L. Craig, Office of Privacy
Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, for questions
on these documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an application to
OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard
collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information
describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's likely burden on
the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection,
and other important information describing the Collection. There is one
ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consistent with
the requirements of Executive Order 13771, Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs, and Executive Order 13777, Enforcing the
Regulatory Reform Agenda, the Coast Guard is also requesting comments
on the extent to which this request for information could be modified
to reduce the burden on respondents.
    In response to your comments, we may revise this ICR or decide not
to seek an extension of approval for the Collection. We will consider
all comments and material received during the comment period.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments must contain the OMB Control Number of
the ICR and the docket number of this request, [USCG-2020-0185], and
must be received by July 13, 2020.

Submitting Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions. Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public
comments, are in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and
can be viewed by following that website's instructions. Additionally,
if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will
be notified when comments are posted.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System
of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).

Information Collection Request

    Title: National Response Resource Inventory.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0102.
    Summary: The information is needed to improve the effectiveness of
deploying response equipment in the event of an oil spill. It may also
be used in the development of contingency plans.
    Need: Section 4202 of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-
380) requires the Coast Guard to compile and maintain a comprehensive
list of spill removal equipment in a response resource inventory (RRI).
This collection helps fulfill that requirement.
    Forms: None.
    Respondents: Oil spill removal organizations.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Hour Burden Estimate: The estimated burden remains 1,378 hours a
year.
    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter
35, as amended.

    Dated: May 8, 2020.
Kathleen Claffie,
Chief, Office of Privacy Management, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2020-10266 Filed 5-12-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 15, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20997-20998]
[FR Doc No: 2020-07927]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER20-1515-000]

Milligan 1 Wind LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Milligan 1 Wind LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is April 29, 2020.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the
eLibrary link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the document. At this time, the
Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public Reference
Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency concerning
the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the

President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,
(202) 502-8659.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at
http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically may mail
similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in
docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services,
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

    Dated: April 9, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-07927 Filed 4-14-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P