[Federal Register: July 22, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 139)]
[Notices]
[Page 36229]
[DOCID:fr22jy09-84]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0454]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office
of Management and Budget Approval; Food Contact Substances Notification
System

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
collection of information entitled ``Food Contact Substances
Notification System'' has been approved by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: : Jonna Capezzuto, Office of
Information Management (HFA-710),Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of December 4, 2008
(73 FR 73936), the agency announced that the proposed information
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0495.
The approval expires on May 31, 2012. A copy of the supporting
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: July 15, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E9-17332 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 116 (Tuesday, June 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34519-34520]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14139]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP14-497-000 -000]

Notice of Application; Dominion Transmission, Inc.

    Take notice that on June 2, 2014, Dominion Transmission, Inc.
(DTI), 120 Tredigar Street, Richmond, Virginia, filed with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission an application under Section 7(c) of the
Natural Gas Act (NGA) to construct, install, own, operate and maintain
certain compression facilities that comprise the New Market Project
located in Chemung, Herkimer, Madison, Montgomery, Schenectady, and
Tompkins Counties, New York, all as more fully set forth in the
application which is on file with the Commission and open for public
inspection.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions regarding this Application should be directed to
Matthew R. Bley, Manager, Gas Transmission Certificates, Dominion
Transmission, Inc., 701 East Cary Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone
no.<PHONE_NUMBER>, facsimile no.<PHONE_NUMBER> and email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 7 copies of filings made in the proceeding with the Commission
and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other party. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests, and interventions via the internet in lieu of paper. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a) (1) (iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site (www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link. Persons unable to file
electronically should submit an original and 5 copies of the protest or
intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Savings Time on July 2,
2014.

    Dated: June 11, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-14139 Filed 6-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 61 (Thursday, March 29, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13577-13580]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06300]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-82942; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2018-022]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Paragraph (c)(5) of Exchange Rule 11.9 Describing the Operation of
Minimum Quantity Orders

March 23, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on March 16, 2018, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BZX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange has designated this proposal as a ``non-controversial''
proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder,\4\ which renders it effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend paragraph (c)(5) of Exchange
Rule 11.9 describing the operation of Minimum Quantity Orders.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(5) for a complete description of
the operation of Minimum Quantity Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
website at www.markets.cboe.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend paragraph (c)(5) of Exchange Rule
11.9 describing the operation of Minimum Quantity Orders by removing
language that provided for the re-pricing of incoming Minimum Quantity
Orders to avoid an internally crossed book. As a result of this change,
the Exchange proposes to specify within the rule when a Minimum
Quantity Order would not be eligible to trade to prevent executions
from occurring that may be inconsistent with intra-market price
priority or that would cause a non-displayed order to trade ahead of a
displayed order.
    In sum, a Minimum Quantity Order is a non-displayed order that
enables a User \6\ to specify a minimum share amount at which the order
will execute.\7\ A Minimum Quantity Order will not execute unless the
volume of contra-side liquidity available to execute against the order
meets or exceeds the designated minimum size. By default, a Minimum
Quantity Order will execute upon entry against a single order or
multiple aggregated orders simultaneously. The Exchange recently
amended the operation of Minimum Quantity Orders to permit a User to
alternatively specify the order not execute against multiple aggregated
orders simultaneously and that the minimum quantity condition be
satisfied by each individual order resting on the BZX Book.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The term ``User'' is defined as ``any Member or Sponsored
Participant who is authorized to obtain access to the System
pursuant to Rule 11.3.'' See Exchange Rule 1.5(cc).
    \7\ The Exchange will only honor a specified minimum quantity on
BZX Only Orders that are non-displayed or Immediate-Or-Cancel and
will disregard a minimum quantity on any other order. See Exchange
Rule 11.9(c)(5).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81807 (October 3,
2017), 82 FR 47065 (October 10, 2017) (SR-BatsBZX-2017-62). This
functionality is pending deployment and the implementation date will
be announced via a trading notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also recently amended the operation of Minimum
Quantity Orders to re-price incoming Minimum Quantity Orders where that
order may cross an order posted on the BZX Book.\9\ Specifically, where
there is insufficient size to satisfy an incoming order's minimum
quantity condition and that incoming order, if posted at its limit
price, would cross an order(s), whether

displayed or non-displayed, resting on the BZX Book, the order with the
minimum quantity condition would be re-priced to and ranked at the
locking price. This functionality has not yet been implemented \10\ and
the Exchange now proposes to amend paragraph (c)(5) of Rule 11.9 to
remove this re-pricing requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Id.
    \10\ See supra note 8. Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(5) does not require
re-pricing where the Minimum Quantity Order is resting on the BZX
Book. As such, an internally crossed book may occur where the
incoming order is of insufficient size to satisfy the resting
order's minimum quantity condition and that incoming order, if
posted at its limit price, would cross that order with a minimum
quantity condition resting on the BZX Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a result of the above change, the Exchange proposes to amend
paragraph (c)(5) of Rule 11.9 to describe when a Minimum Quantity Order
will not be eligible to trade to prevent executions from occurring that
may be inconsistent with intra-market price priority or would result in
a non-displayed order trading ahead of a same-priced, same-side
displayed order.\11\ The Exchange would not permit a Minimum Quantity
Order that crosses other displayed or non-displayed orders on the BZX
Book to trade at prices that are worse than the price of such contra-
side orders. The Exchange would also not permit a resting Minimum
Quantity Order to trade at a price equal to a contra-side displayed
order. This proposal is based on recently adopted NYSE Arca, Inc.
(``NYSE Arca'') Rule 7.31-E(i)(3)(C).\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Exchange Rule 11.12(a) states that orders on the BZX Book
are ranked and maintained by the Exchange according to price-time
priority. Exchange Rule 11.12(a) further prohibits a non-displayed
order from trading ahead of a same-side, same-priced displayed
order. This proposed rule change adds language to Exchange Rule
11.9(c)(5) to clarify this priority scheme during an internally
crossed market.
    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82504 (January 16,
2018), 83 FR 3038 (January 22, 2018) (SR-NYSEArca-2018-01) (Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Rule 7.31-E Relating to Mid-Point Liquidity Orders and the
Minimum Trade Size Modifier and Rule 7.36-E To Add a Definition of
``Aggressing Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Paragraph (c)(5) of Rule 11.9 would state that a Minimum Quantity
Order to buy (sell) that is ranked in the BZX Book will not be eligible
to trade: (i) At a price equal to or above (below) any sell (buy)
orders that are displayed and that have a ranked price equal to or
below (above) the price of such Minimum Quantity Order; or (ii) at a
price above (below) any sell (buy) order that is non-displayed and has
a ranked price below (above) the price of such Minimum Quantity
Order.\13\ However, a Minimum Quantity Order that crosses an order on
BZX Book may execute at a price less aggressive than its ranked price
against an incoming order so long as such execution is consistent with
the above restrictions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ A Minimum Quantity Order to buy (sell) may execute at a
price above (below) any sell (buy) order that is Non-Displayed and
has a ranked price below (above) the price of such Minimum Quantity
Order if that Non-Displayed order itself included a minimum quantity
condition that prevented it from executing. See infra note 16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following examples describe the proposed operation of a Minimum
Quantity Order during an internally crossed market. This first example
addresses intra-market priority amongst a Minimum Quantity Order and
other non-displayed orders in an internally crossed market as well as
when an execution may occur at prices less aggressive than the resting
order's ranked price. Assume the NBBO is $10.10 by $10.16. A non-
displayed order to sell 50 shares at $10.12 is resting on the BZX Book
(``Order A''). A non-displayed order to sell 25 shares at $10.11 is
also resting on the BZX Book (``Order B''). The Exchange receives a
Mid-Point Peg \14\ order to buy at $10.14 with a minimum quantity
condition to execute against a single order of 100 shares (``Order
C''). Because Order C's minimum quantity condition cannot be met, Order
C will not trade with Orders A or B and will be posted and ranked on
the BZX Book at $10.13, the midpoint of the NBBO. The Exchange now has
a non-displayed order crossing both non-displayed orders on the BZX
Book. If the Exchange then receives a non-displayed order to sell for
100 shares at $10.11 (``Order D''),\15\ although Order D would be
marketable against Order C at $10.13, it would not trade at $10.13
because it is above the price of all resting sell orders. Order D will
instead execute against Order C at $10.11, receiving price improvement
relative to the midpoint of the NBBO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(9).
    \15\ On NYSE Arca, Order D will be posted to the NYSE Arca book
at $10.11 and not execute against Order C at $10.13. See supra note
12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This second example addresses intra-market priority amongst
displayed orders, Minimum Quantity Orders and other non-displayed
orders. The Exchange notes that the below behavior is not unique to an
internally crossed market as the Exchange's priority rule, 11.12(a),
currently prohibits non-displayed orders, including Minimum Quantity
Orders, from trading ahead of same-priced, same-side displayed orders.
Assume the NBBO is $10.00 by $10.04. A non-displayed order to buy 500
shares at $10.00 is resting on the BZX Book (``Order A''). A displayed
order to buy 100 shares at $10.00 is then entered and posted to the BZX
Book (``Order B''). The Exchange receives a non-displayed order to sell
600 shares at $10.00 with a minimum quantity condition to execute
against a single order of 500 shares (``Order C''). Although Order A
satisfies Order C's minimum quantity condition and has time priority
ahead of Order B, no execution occurs because Order B is a displayed
order and has execution priority over Order A, a non-displayed order.
Order C does not execute against Order B because Order B does not
satisfy Order C's minimum quantity condition. Order C is then posted to
the BZX Book at $10.00, non-displayed.
    The Exchange also proposes two clarifying changes to paragraph
(c)(5) of Exchange Rule 11.9. The rule currently states that a Minimum
Quantity Order cedes execution priority when it would lock an order
against which it would otherwise execute if it were not for the minimum
execution size restriction.\16\ The Exchange now proposes to add
additional language to the rule to clarify when a resting non-displayed
order may cede execution priority to a subsequent arriving same-side
order. As amended, paragraph (h) of Rule 11.6 would state that if a
resting non-displayed sell (buy) order did not meet the minimum
quantity condition of a same-priced resting Minimum Quantity Order to
buy (sell), a subsequently arriving sell (buy) order that meets the
minimum quantity condition will trade ahead of such resting non-
displayed sell (buy) order at that price. For example, assume the NBBO
is $10.00 by $10.10 and no orders are resting on the BZX Book. A non-
displayed order to buy 700 shares at $10.10 with a minimum quantity
condition to execute against a single order of 500 shares is resting on
the BZX Book (Order A). A non-displayed order to sell 100 shares at
$10.10 is then entered and posted to the BZX Book (Order B). Order B
does not execute against Order A because Order B does not satisfy Order
A's single minimum quantity condition of 500 shares. As a result, Order
B is posted to the BZX Book at $10.10, creating an internally locked
book. An order to sell 500 shares at $10.10 is then entered and
executes against Order A at $10.10 for 500 shares because the incoming
order is of sufficient size to satisfy Order A's minimum quantity
condition of 500 shares. This clarification is also based on recently
adopted NYSE Arca Rule 7.31-E(i)(3)(E)(ii).\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ The Exchange proposes to amend this provision to clarify
that a Minimum Quantity Order would cede execution priority when it
would also cross an order against which it would otherwise execute
if it were not for the minimum execution size restriction.
    \17\ Supra note 12.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Lastly, the Exchange proposes to clarify that an incoming Minimum
Quantity Order would be canceled where, if posted, it would cross the
displayed price of an order on the BZX Book.\18\ Conversely, an
incoming Minimum Quantity Order would be posted to the BZX Book where
it would not cross the displayed price of a resting contra-side order.
For example, an order to buy at $11.00 with a minimum quantity
condition of 500 shares is entered (Order A) and there is a displayed
order resting on the BZX Book to sell 200 shares at $10.99 (Order B).
Order A would be cancelled because it crosses the displayed price of
Order B and Order B does not contain sufficient size to satisfy Order
A's minimum quantity condition of 500 shares. However, should Order A
be priced at $10.99, it would not be cancelled and would be posted to
the BZX Book, resulting in an internally locked market. Order A would
not be executable at that price because it is priced equal to a contra-
side displayed order. An internally crossed market may subsequently
occur should an order to sell priced more aggressively than Order A be
entered but not be of sufficient size to satisfy Order A's minimum
quantity condition of 500 shares (e.g., an order to sell 100 shares at
$10.98) and posted to the BZX Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ A Minimum Quantity Order will be repriced in accordance
with Exchange Rule 11.9(g)(4) where it would cross a protected quote
displayed on an away market center.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \19\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \20\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. The proposed rule change
removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system because it would ensure that
Minimum Quantity Orders do not trade through displayed orders or
violate intra-market price priority. Specifically, the proposed rule
change would protect displayed orders by preventing a Minimum Quantity
Order from executing where it is locked by a contra-side Displayed
order. The proposed rule change protects intra-market price priority by
preventing a resting Minimum Quantity Order from executing where it is
crossed by either a displayed or non-displayed order on the BZX Book.
The proposed clarifications remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system
because they provide additional specificity regarding the operation of
a Minimum Quantity Order, thereby avoiding potential investor
confusion. In particular, the Exchange believes it is reasonable for a
resting non-displayed order to cede execution priority to a subsequent
arriving same-side order where that order is of sufficient size to
satisfy a resting contra-side order's minimum quantity condition
because doing so facilitates executions in accordance with the terms
and conditions of each order. The proposed rule change is also
substantially similar to a proposed rule change recently submitted by
NYSE Arca for immediate effectiveness and published by the
Commission.\21\ The only differences between the proposed rule change
and that of NYSE Arca is that: (i) NYSE Arca does not cancel a minimum
quantity order that would cross a displayed order on the NYSE Arca
book; and (ii) NYSE Arca will not execute resting orders at prices less
aggressive than their limit prices in crossed markets. The Exchange
believes that these differences are immaterial because they are
designed to reduce the occurrences of internally crossed markets and
facilitate executions that may not otherwise occur. These differences
will also continue to ensure that executions occur in accordance with
intra-market price priority on the Exchange while accounting for the
differences in functionality and order types.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \21\ See supra notes 12 and 15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. On
the contrary, the proposed rule change is not designed to address any
competitive issues because it is intended to provide clarity regarding
the operation of Minimum Quantity Orders and when such orders are
eligible to trade and not trade through displayed orders or violate
intra-market price priority.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No comments were solicited or received on the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (A)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (B) impose any significant burden on competition; and (C) by
its terms, become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was
filed or such shorter time as the Commission may designate it has
become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \22\ and
paragraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\23\ the Exchange has
designated this rule filing as non-controversial. The Exchange has
given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed
rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed
rule change at least five business days prior to the date of filing of
the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (1)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (2) for the protection
of investors; or (3) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CboeBZX-2018-022 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange

Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2018-022. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2018-022, and should be
submitted on or before April 19, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-06300 Filed 3-28-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P