[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57416-57417]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23361]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0039; FRL-10001-13]

Pesticide Product Registration; Receipt of Applications for New
Active Ingredients (September 2019)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has received applications to register pesticide products
containing active ingredients not included in any currently registered
pesticide products. Pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA is hereby providing notice of receipt and
opportunity to comment on these applications.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 25, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number and the File Symbol of interest as shown in the body of
this document, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/where-send-comments-epa-dockets.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/about-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

II. Registration Applications

    EPA has received applications to register pesticide products
containing active ingredients not included in any currently registered
pesticide products. Pursuant to the provisions of FIFRA section 3(c)(4)
(7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(4)), EPA is hereby providing notice of receipt and
opportunity to comment on these applications. Notice of receipt of
these applications does not imply a decision by the Agency on these
applications.

New Active Ingredients

    1. File Symbol: 91213-G. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0336.
Applicant: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural
Research Service, 920 Valley Road, Reno NV 89512. Product name:
Battalion Pro. Active ingredient: Herbicide--Pseudomonas fluorescens
strain ACK55 at 100%. Proposed use: End use product. For suppression of
cheat grass/downy brome, medusahead, and jointed goat grass through use
as a seed treatment or a spray in the following areas: Crops (i.e.,
cereal grains and forage, fodder, and straw of cereal grains; grass
forage, fodder, and hay; non-grass animal feeds; oilseeds; legumes;
tree nuts; and berries and small fruit), rangeland, forest, pasture,
turf, conservation reserve program lands, sod production, golf courses,

recreational areas, road sides, road cuts, construction sites, and
rights-of-way. Contact: BPPD.
    2. File Symbol: 91213-U. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0336.
Applicant: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural
Research Service, 920 Valley Road, Reno NV 89512. Product name:
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain ACK55 Technical. Active ingredient:
Herbicide--Pseudomonas fluorescens strain ACK55 at 100%. Proposed use:
Manufacturing use product. Contact: BPPD.
    3. File Symbol: 93566-R. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0550.
Applicant: G.D.G Environment, 430 Rue Saint-Laurent, Trois-Rivieres
(Quebec) G8T 6H3 Canada c/o Technology Sciences Group, USA, 1150 18th
Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. Product name: Fraxiprotec. Active
ingredient: Insecticide--Beauveria bassiana strain CFL-A at 12%.
Proposed use: End use product/Control Emerald Ash Borer Beetle.
Contact: BPPD.

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: October 10, 2019.
Delores Barber,
Director, Information Technology and Resources Management Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2019-23361 Filed 10-24-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


                                                                        6560-50
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 [EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0971; FRL - ]

 Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Aerosol Coatings

AGENCY:	Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION:	Notice.
SUMMARY:	The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an information collection request (ICR), "National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Aerosol Coatings" (EPA ICR No. 2289.05, OMB Control No. 2060-0617) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through November 30, 2021. Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register (86 FR 19256) on April 13, 2021 during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden and cost to the public. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
 DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before [insert date 30 days after publication in the Federal Register].
ADDRESSES:  Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0971,  to (1) EPA online using https://www.regulations.gov/ (our preferred method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for EPA.
	The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our staff, the EPA Docket Center and Reading Room are closed to the public, with limited exceptions, to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID - 19. Our Docket Center staff will continue to provide remote customer service via email, phone, and webform. We encourage the public to submit comments via https://www.regulations.gov/ or email, as there may be a delay in processing mail and faxes. Hand deliveries and couriers may be received by scheduled appointment only. For further information on the EPA Docket Center services and the
current status, please visit us online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Muntasir Ali, Sector Policies and Program Division (D243-05), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
	Supporting documents which explain in detail the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
Abstract: The EPA is required under section 183(e) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) to regulate volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from the use of consumer and commercial products. Pursuant to CAA section 183(e)(3), the EPA published a list of consumer and commercial products and a schedule for their regulation (60 FR 15264). Aerosol coatings are included on the list, and the standards for such coatings are codified at 40 CFR Part 59, Subpart E. The reports required under the standards enable the EPA to identify coating formulations manufactured, imported, or distributed in the United States, and to determine the product-weighted reactivity. The ICR addresses the burden for activities conducted in 3-year increments after promulgation of the National VOC Emission Standards for Aerosol Coatings. Regulated entities read instructions to determine how they are affected by the rule. They are required to submit initial notifications when an aerosol coating is manufactured and notification of changes in the initial report, to report formulation data and exemptions claimed, and to maintain records. In addition, regulated entities are required to submit triennial reports that include formulation data and VOC usage.
Form Numbers: None.
Respondents/affected entities: Respondents to this information collection are manufacturers, distributors, and importers of aerosol coatings. These regulated entities fall within the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code 32551, "Paint and Coating Manufacturing," and NAICS Code 325998, "All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Production and Preparation Manufacturing."
Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR Part 59, Subpart E).
Estimated number of respondents:  67 (total).
Frequency of response: Annual, triennial.
Total estimated burden: 13,600 hours (per year).  Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
Total estimated cost:  $973,000 (per year), includes $) annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is a small increase in burden from the most recently approved ICR as currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved Burdens. This is due to two considerations. The regulations have not changed over the past three years and are not anticipated to change over the next three years. The estimated growth rate for this industry is one new respondent per year, leading to a slow increase in burden. There are no changes in the capital/startup or operation and maintenance (O&M) costs, which remain at $0. We have added 1 hour of burden for existing sources to re-familiarize themselves with the rule each year. We have also adjusted the respondent burden to account for managerial hours as 5% of technical hours and clerical hours as 10% of technical hours for industry respondents. The previous ICR assigned direct managerial and technical hours and only calculated clerical hours as a percentage of technical hours. These changes reflect EPA standard estimates of burden by labor category. There is a slight increase in labor costs due to the use of updated labor rates. This ICR uses labor rates from the most recent Bureau of Labor Statistics report (May 2020) to calculate respondent burden costs.
Dated: _____________________________________
___________________________________________
Courtney Kerwin, Director, Regulatory Support Division


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 16620]
[FR Doc No: 2023-05532]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP22-494-000]

Boardwalk Storage Company, LLC; Notice of Availability of the
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed BSC Compression Replacement
Project

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for the BSC
Compression Replacement Project, proposed by Boardwalk Storage Company,
LLC (BSC) in the above-referenced docket. BSC requests authorization to
abandon by removal one existing electric driven 10,000 horsepower (HP)
compression unit, place one existing electric driven 10,000 hp
compressor unit on standby, and install a new electric driven 9,000 hp
compressor unit, station piping, and other auxiliary facilities at the
Choctaw Compressor Station in Iberville Parish, Louisiana.
    The environmental assessment (EA) assesses the potential
environmental effects of the construction and operation of the BSC
Compression Replacement Project in accordance with the requirements of
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The FERC staff concludes
that approval of the proposed project, with appropriate mitigating
measures, would not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment.
    The Commission mailed a copy of the Notice of Availability of the
EA to Federal, State, and local government representatives and
agencies; elected officials; environmental and public interest groups;
Native American tribes; potentially affected landowners and other
interested individuals and groups; and newspapers and libraries in the
project area. The EA is only available in electronic format. It may be
viewed and downloaded from the FERC's website (www.ferc.gov), on the
natural gas environmental documents page (https://www.ferc.gov/industries-data/natural-gas/environment/environmental-documents). In
addition, the EA may be accessed by using the eLibrary link on the
FERC's website. Click on the eLibrary link (https://elibrary.ferc.gov/eLibrary/search), select ``General Search'' and enter the docket number
in the ``Docket Number'' field, excluding the last three digits (i.e.
CP22-494). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
[email protected] or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The EA is not a decision document. It presents Commission staff's
independent analysis of the environmental issues for the Commission to
consider when addressing the merits of all issues in this proceeding.
Any person wishing to comment on the EA may do so. Your comments should
focus on the EA's disclosure and discussion of potential environmental
effects, reasonable alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen
environmental impacts. The more specific your comments, the more useful
they will be. To ensure that the Commission has the opportunity to
consider your comments prior to making its decision on this project, it
is important that we receive your comments in Washington, DC on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 12, 2023.
    For your convenience, there are three methods you can use to file
your comments to the Commission. The Commission encourages electronic
filing of comments and has staff available to assist you at (866) 208-
3676 or [email protected]. Please carefully follow these
instructions so that your comments are properly recorded.
    (1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature on the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
FERC Online. This is an easy method for submitting brief, text-only
comments on a project;
    (2) You can also file your comments electronically using the
eFiling feature on the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov) under the
link to FERC Online. With eFiling, you can provide comments in a
variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your submission.
New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking on
``eRegister.'' You must select the type of filing you are making. If
you are filing a comment on a particular project, please select
``Comment on a Filing''; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the Commission. Be sure to reference the project docket number (CP22-
494-000) on your letter. Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service
must be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC
20426. Submissions sent via any other carrier must be addressed to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Filing environmental comments will not give you intervenor status,
but you do not need intervenor status to have your comments considered.
Only intervenors have the right to seek rehearing or judicial review of
the Commission's decision. At this point in this proceeding, the
timeframe for filing timely intervention requests has expired. Any
person seeking to become a party to the proceeding must file a motion
to intervene out-of-time pursuant to Rule 214(b)(3) and (d) of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures (18 CFR 385.214(b)(3) and
(d)) and show good cause why the time limitation should be waived.
Motions to intervene are more fully described at https://www.ferc.gov/how-intervene.
    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC website (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. The eLibrary link
also provides access to the texts of all formal documents issued by the
Commission, such as orders, notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to https://www.ferc.gov/ferc-online/overview to
register for eSubscription.

    Dated: March 13, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-05532 Filed 3-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5848-5850]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2227]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63781; File No. SR-Phlx-2011-09]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
the Order Entry Port Fee

January 26, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 21, 2011, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the applicability of the Order Entry
Port Fee.\3\ The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site at http://nasdaqtrader.com/micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings, at the principal office of the Exchange, and
at

the Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Order Entry Port Fee is a connectivity fee assessed on
members in connection with routing orders to the Exchange via an
external order entry port. Members access the Exchange's network
through order entry ports. A member organization may have more than
one order entry port.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the
applicability of the Order Entry Port Fee. The Exchange currently
assesses an Order Entry Port Fee per month per mnemonic \4\ of $500.
This fee is assessed on members regardless of whether the order entry
mnemonic is active \5\ during the billing month. The fee is assessed
regardless of usage, and solely on the number of order entry ports
assigned to each member organization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Order entry mnemonics are codes that identify member
organization order entry ports.
    \5\ An order entry mnemonic is considered active if a member
organization sends at least one order to the Exchange using that
order entry mnemonic during the applicable billing month. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58728 (October 3, 2008), 73 FR
59695 (October 9, 2008) (SR-Phlx-2008-70).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is proposing to modify the manner in which members are
assessed the Order Entry Port Fee as related to complex order.\6\ The
Exchange proposes to waive the $500 per month per mnemonic Order Entry
Port Fee for mnemonics used exclusively for complex orders where one of
the components of the complex order is the underlying security.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ A complex order is a spread, straddle, combination, ratio or
collar order, all of which consist of more than one component,
priced like a single order at a net debit or credit based on the
prices of the individual components. See Exchange Rule 1080,
Commentary .08(a)(i).
    \7\ The Exchange recently filed a proposed rule change to add
complex orders where one component is the underlying stock or ETF to
the functionality on its electronic trading platform for options,
Phlx XL. The Exchange also amended its definition of complex orders
in Exchange Rule 1080 as follows: Complex Orders is any order
involving the simultaneous purchase and/or sale of two or more
different options series in the same underlying security, priced at
a net debit or credit based on the relative prices of the individual
components, for the same account, for the purpose of executing a
particular investment strategy. Furthermore, a Complex Order can
also be a stock-option order, which is an order to buy or sell a
stated number of units of an underlying stock or ETF coupled with
the purchase or sale of options contract(s). The Exchange also
proposed to permit complex orders consisting of up to six
components. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63509 (December
9, 2010), 76 FR 2733 (January 14, 2011) (SR-Phlx-2010-157) [sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that members who transact complex orders may
require an increased number of ports due to the member's stock
clearance arrangements, which may require additional mnemonics. The
Exchange is proposing to limit the fees that would be assessed on
members requiring additional ports to transact stock-option orders.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ A complex order with one component that is the underlying
stock or Exchange Traded Fund Share (``ETF'') is also referred to as
a stock-option order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Fee Schedule
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \9\ in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \10\ in particular, in
that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees and other charges
among Exchange members and other persons using its facilities. The
Exchange believes that the proposal is equitable and reasonable because
all members would be able to limit fees related to order entry ports
for such complex orders that are stock-option orders, which may require
additional mnemonics.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\11\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2011-09 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2011-09. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-Phlx-

2011-09 and should be submitted on or before February 23, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-2227 Filed 2-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19110-19111]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06845]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2022-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2225]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before June 30, 2022.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2225, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email) [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be
identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date
listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Larimer County, Colorado and Incorporated Areas
Project: 19-08-0002S Preliminary Date: January 26, 2021 and December 20,
                                  2021
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Fort Collins...................  Stormwater Utilities
                                          Department, 700 Wood Street,
                                          Fort Collins, CO 80521.
City of Loveland.......................  Public Works Department, 2525
                                          West 1st Street, Loveland, CO
                                          80537.
Town of Estes Park.....................  Town Hall, 170 MacGregor
                                          Avenue, Estes Park, CO 80517.
Town of Johnstown......................  Town Hall, 450 South Parish
                                          Avenue, Johnstown, CO 80534.
Town of Timnath........................  Town of Timnath Map Repository,
                                          TST Inc., 748 Whalers Way,
                                          Fort Collins, CO 80525.
Town of Wellington.....................  Town Hall, 3735 Cleveland
                                          Avenue, Wellington, CO 80549.
Town of Windsor........................  Town Hall, 301 Walnut Street,
                                          Windsor, CO 80550.
Unincorporated Areas of Larimer County.  Larimer County Courthouse
                                          Offices Building, 200 West Oak
                                          Street, Suite 3000, Fort
                                          Collins, CO 80521.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Thurston County, Washington and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 20-10-0027S Preliminary Date: June 25, 2021
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Yelm...........................  City Hall, 106 2nd Street
                                          Southeast, Yelm, WA 98597.
Nisqually Indian Tribe.................  Nisqually Indian Tribe Planning
                                          and Economic Development, 4820
                                          She-Nah-Num Drive Southeast,
                                          Olympia, WA 98513.
Thurston County Unincorporated Areas...  Thurston County Courthouse,
                                          2000 Lakeridge Drive
                                          Southwest, Building One,
                                          Olympia, WA 98502.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-06845 Filed 3-31-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 28 (Monday, February 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 9687]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03010]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 8315-010]

Verso Sartell LLC, AIM Development (USA) LLC; Notice of
Application for Transfer of License, and Soliciting Comments and
Motions To Intervene

    On January 31, 2013, Verso Sartell LLC (transferor) and the AIM
Development (USA) LLC (transferee) filed an application for the
transfer of license for the Sartell Dam Project (FERC No. 8315),
located on the Mississippi River in Stearns and Benton counties,
Minnesota.
    Applicants seek Commission approval to transfer the license for the
Sartell Dam Project from the transferor to the transferee. The project
is currently not producing power due to the permanent closure of the
Sartell Paper Mill; which was the sole recipient of project power.
Transferee plans to return ability of the project to provide consumable
electricity.
    Applicants' Contact: Transferor: Mr. Robert C. Fallon, Esq.,
Leonard, Street & Deinard, PA, 1350 I Street NW., Suite 800,
Washington, DC 20005, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. Transferee: Mr. Jeffrey
L. McGlin, General Manager, AIM Development (USA) LLC, 433 N. Main
Street, Kimberly, WI 54136, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Deadline for filing comments and motions to intervene: 15 days from
the issuance date of this notice. Comments and motions to intervene may
be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site under http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief
comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the
eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You
must include your name and contact information at the end of your
comments. If unable to be filed electronically, documents may be paper-
filed. To paper-file, an original plus seven copies should be mailed
to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. More information about this
project can be viewed or printed on the eLibrary link of Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the
docket number (P-8315) in the docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

    Dated: February 5, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-03010 Filed 2-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 112 (Friday, June 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35543-35544]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12546]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of modified system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is modifying the systems of
records listed in this notice to incorporate two new routine uses
related to the breach of personally identifiable information (PII)
pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum M-17-
12. The first routine use deals with the breach of FERC's records, and
the second addresses the disclosure of FERC's records to assist other
agencies in their efforts to respond to a breach of their own records.

DATES: Please submit comments on or before July 11, 2022. These new
routine uses are effective July 11, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Any person interested in commenting on the establishment of
these Privacy Act Breach Routine Uses may do so by submitting comments
electronically to: [email protected] (include a reference to ``Privacy
Act Breach Routine Uses'' in the subject line of the message.)

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mittal Desai, Chief Information
Officer & Senior Agency Official for Privacy, Office of the Executive
Director, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 3, 2017, the Office of Management
and Budget issued Memorandum 17-12, Preparing for and Responding to a
Breach of Personally Identifiable Information, to the heads of all
executive departments and agencies. Among other things, this memorandum
requires the addition of routine uses to ensure that agencies are able
to disclose records or information in their systems of records in
response to an actual or suspected breach of its own records or to
assist other agencies in their efforts to respond to a breach of their
own records. FERC is, therefore, proposing the addition of two new
routine uses. Unless this or other published notice expressly provides
otherwise, these two routines uses apply to all FERC Privacy Act system
of records listed in this notice. These routine uses supplement but do
not replace any routine uses that are separately published in the
specific individual System of Records Notice (SORN). These proposed
routine uses are compatible with the purpose for which each of the
records or information was collected.

SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER:
    First, the systems of records to be modified by including the two
new routine uses described in this Notice are set forth below. As these
two routine uses are additional new routine uses, please refer to the
specific individual SORN for other routine uses unchanged by this
notice. Second, please refer to the specific individual SORN for
additional governing elements unchanged by this notice. Finally, please
note that FERC SORNs omitted from this table have already incorporated
the two new routine uses described in this notice.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
        SORN No.                SORN name         Federal Register cites
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FERC-6.................  Biographical Material    65 FR 21743.*
                          on FERC Commissioners
                          and Key Staff Members.
FERC-15................  Commission Labor and     65 FR 21743.*
                          Employee Relations
                          Case Files.
FERC-16................  Commission Death Cases   65 FR 21744.*
                          File.
FERC-17................  Commission Disability    65 FR 21744.*
                          Retirements File.

FERC-18................  Commission Discontinued  65 FR 21745.*
                          Service Retirements
                          File.
FERC-19................  Commission Equal         65 FR 21745.*
                          Employment Opportunity
                          (EEO) Discrimination
                          Complaints File.
FERC-20................  Commission Employee      65 FR 21746.*
                          Suggestions File.
FERC-21................  Commission Training      65 FR 21746.*
                          Records.
FERC-22................  Commission Indebtedness  65 FR 21747.*
                          Cases Files.
FERC-23................  Commission Leave         65 FR 21747.*
                          Without Pay Requests
                          File.
FERC-25................  Commission Office of     65 FR 21748.*
                          Workers Compensation
                          Program (OWCP) Claims
                          File.
FERC-27................  Commission               65 FR 21749.*
                          Reconsideration of
                          Retirement Refund
                          Decisions File.
FERC-28................  Commission Restoration   65 FR 21750.*
                          of Annual Leave
                          Requests File.
FERC-29................  Commission Unemployment  65 FR 21750.*
                          Compensation File.
FERC-30................  Commission Within-Grade  65 FR 21750.*
                          Increase (WGI) Denials
                          and Reconsideration
                          File.
FERC-32................  Commission Fitness       65 FR 21751.*
                          Center Records.
FERC-35................  Commission Security      65 FR 21752.*
                          Investigations Records.
FERC-36................  Management,              65 FR 21753.*
                          Administrative, and
                          Payroll System (MAPS).
FERC-37................  Commission Voluntary     65 FR 21753.*
                          Leave Transfer Files.
FERC-38................  Commission Employee      65 FR 21754.*
                          Performance Files.
FERC-39................  Commission Temporary     65 FR 21754.*
                          Work-at-Home Program.
FERC-40................  Commission Family        65 FR 21755.*
                          Medical Leave Act
                          (FMLA) Request Files.
FERC-42................  Commission Headquarters  65 FR 21756.*
                          Security Access and
                          Control Records.
FERC-43................  Commission Travel        65 FR 21756.*
                          Records.
FERC-46................  Commission Freedom of    81 FR 61682.*
                          Information Act and
                          Privacy Act Request
                          Files.
FERC-47................  Commission Office of     65 FR 21758.*
                          Finance, Accounting
                          and Operations'
                          Recruitment Records.
FERC-48................  Department of Energy     65 FR 21759.*
                          (DOE) Inspector
                          General Investigative
                          Records Relating to
                          the Federal Energy
                          Regulatory Commission.
FERC-49................  Commission               65 FR 21760.*
                          Telecommunications
                          Records.
FERC-50................  Commission Accounting    65 FR 21760.*
                          System Records.
FERC-51................  Commission               65 FR 21761.*
                          Congressional
                          Correspondence, State
                          Files and Constituent
                          Records.
FERC-52................  Commission Supervisor-   65 FR 21761.*
                          Maintained Personnel
                          Records.
FERC-53................  Information Technology   79 FR 17529.*
                          System Log Records.
FERC-54................  Commission Employee      65 FR 21763.*
                          Assistance Program
                          Records.
FERC-55................  Personal Identity        70 FR 61612.*
                          Verification (PIV)
                          Records.
FERC-57................  Federal Personnel        74 FR 57308.*
                          Payroll System (FPPS).
FERC-58................  Critical Energy          79 FR 17530.*
                          Infrastructure
                          Information (CEII)
                          Records.
FERC-59................  Enforcement              79 FR 17531.*
                          Investigation Records.
FERC-60................  Hotline Records........  79 FR 17532.*
FERC-61................  Requests for Commission  79 FR 17532.*
                          Publications and
                          Information.
FERC-62................  Public Information       79 FR 17534.*
                          Requests.
FERC-63................  Company Registration     79 FR 17534.*
                          Records.
FERC-64................  Individual Registration  79 FR 17534.*
                          Records.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
An asterisk (*) designates the last full Federal Register notice that
  includes all of the elements that are required to be in a System of
  Records Notice.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:
    Unclassified.

SYSTEM LOCATION:
    The applicable program executive is identified in each notice.

SYSTEM MANAGER(S):
    The applicable system manager(s) is identified in each notice.
* * * * *

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES
OF USERS AND PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
    In addition to those disclosures generally permitted under 5 U.S.C.
552a(b) of the Privacy Act, information maintained in this system may
be disclosed to authorized entities outside FERC for purposes
determined to be relevant and necessary as a routine use pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(b)(3) as follows:
     To appropriate agencies, entities, and persons when (1)
FERC suspects or has confirmed that there has been a breach of the
system of records; (2) FERC has determined that as a result of the
suspected or confirmed breach there is a risk of harm to individuals,
the Commission (including its information systems, programs, and
operations), the Federal Government, or national security; and (3) the
disclosure made to such agencies, entities, and persons is reasonably
necessary to assist in connection with the Commission's efforts to
respond to the suspected or confirmed breach or to prevent, minimize,
or remedy such harm.
     To another Federal agency or Federal entity, when FERC
determines that information from this system of records is reasonably
necessary to assist the recipient agency or entity in: (1) responding
to a suspected or confirmed breach; or (2) preventing, minimizing, or
remedying the risk of harm to individuals, the recipient agency or
entity (including its information systems, programs, and operations),
the Federal Government, or national security, resulting from a
suspected or confirmed breach.

HISTORY:
    See System Name and Number above.

    Dated: June 6, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-12546 Filed 6-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53907-53908]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22145]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-P-0460]

Determination That TALWIN COMPOUND (Aspirin; Pentazocine
Hydrochloride) Tablets, 325 Milligrams; Equivalent to 12.5 Milligram
Base, Were Not Withdrawn From Sale for Reasons of Safety or
Effectiveness

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that
TALWIN COMPOUND (aspirin; pentazocine hydrochloride (HCl)) tablets, 325
milligrams (mg); equivalent to (EQ) 12.5 mg base, were not withdrawn
from sale for reasons of safety or effectiveness. This determination
will allow FDA to approve abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) for
aspirin; pentazocine HCl tablets, 325 mg; EQ 12.5 mg base, if all other
legal and regulatory requirements are met.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nam Kim, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Bldg. 51, rm. 6320, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1984, Congress enacted the Drug Price
Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417)
(the 1984 amendments), which authorized the approval of duplicate
versions of drug products under an ANDA procedure. ANDA applicants
must, with certain exceptions, show that the drug for which they are
seeking approval contains the same active ingredient in the same
strength and dosage form as the ``listed drug,'' which is a version of
the drug that was previously approved. ANDA applicants do not have to
repeat the extensive clinical testing otherwise necessary to gain
approval of a new drug application (NDA). The only clinical data
required in an ANDA are data to show that the drug that is the subject
of the ANDA is bioequivalent to the listed drug.
    The 1984 amendments include what is now section 505(j)(7) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(7)), which
requires FDA to publish a list of all approved drugs. FDA publishes
this list as part of the ``Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic
Equivalence Evaluations,'' which is known generally as the ``Orange
Book.'' Under FDA regulations, drugs are removed from the list if the
Agency withdraws or suspends approval of the drug's NDA or ANDA for
reasons of safety or effectiveness or if FDA determines that the listed
drug was withdrawn from sale for reasons of safety or effectiveness (21
CFR 314.162).
    A person may petition the Agency to determine, or the Agency may
determine on its own initiative, whether a listed drug was withdrawn
from sale for reasons of safety or effectiveness. This determination
may be made at any time after the drug has been withdrawn from sale,
but must be made prior to approving an ANDA that refers to the listed
drug (Sec.  314.161 (21 CFR 314.161)). FDA may not approve an ANDA that
does not refer to a listed drug.
    TALWIN COMPOUND (aspirin; pentazocine HCl) tablets, 325 mg; EQ 12.5
mg base, are the subject of NDA 016891, held by Sanofi-aventis U.S.,
and initially approved on November 12, 1975. TALWIN COMPOUND tablets
are indicated for the relief of moderate pain.
    TALWIN COMPOUND (aspirin; pentazocine HCl) tablets, 325 mg; EQ 12.5
mg base, are currently listed in the

``Discontinued Drug Product List'' section of the Orange Book.
    Lachman Consultant Services, Inc., submitted a citizen petition
dated June 7, 2011 (Docket No. FDA-2011-P-0460), under 21 CFR 10.30,
requesting that the Agency determine whether TALWIN COMPOUND (aspirin;
pentazocine HCl) tablets, 325 mg; EQ 12.5 mg base, have been
voluntarily withdrawn or withheld from sale for reasons of safety or
effectiveness.
    After considering the citizen petition and reviewing Agency records
and based on the information we have at this time, FDA has determined
under Sec.  314.161 that TALWIN COMPOUND (aspirin; pentazocine HCl)
tablets, 325 mg; EQ 12.5 mg base, were not withdrawn for reasons of
safety or effectiveness. The petitioner has identified no data or other
information suggesting that TALWIN COMPOUND (aspirin; pentazocine HCl)
tablets, 325 mg; EQ 12.5 mg base, were withdrawn for reasons of safety
or effectiveness. We have carefully reviewed our files for records
concerning the withdrawal of TALWIN COMPOUND (aspirin; pentazocine HCl)
tablets, 325 mg; EQ 12.5 mg base, from sale. We have also independently
evaluated relevant literature and data for possible postmarketing
adverse events. We have found no information that would indicate that
this product was withdrawn from sale for reasons of safety or
effectiveness.
    Accordingly, the Agency will continue to list TALWIN COMPOUND
(aspirin; pentazocine HCl) tablets, 325 mg; EQ 12.5 mg base, in the
``Discontinued Drug Product List'' section of the Orange Book. The
``Discontinued Drug Product List'' delineates, among other items, drug
products that have been discontinued from marketing for reasons other
than safety or effectiveness. ANDAs that refer to TALWIN COMPOUND
(aspirin; pentazocine HCl) tablets, 325 mg; EQ 12.5 mg base, may be
approved by the Agency as long as they meet all other legal and
regulatory requirements for the approval of ANDAs. If FDA determines
that labeling for this drug product should be revised to meet current
standards, the Agency will advise ANDA applicants to submit such
labeling.

    Dated: August 25, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-22145 Filed 8-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


MEMORANDUM

TO:	Docket No.: EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0309

FROM:	Mary Johnson, EPA/Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS)

DATE:	February 12, 2018

SUBJECT:	Summary of Communications with Industry and Stakeholder Input for Risk Modeling of the Wet-Formed Fiberglass Mat Production Source Category
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Introduction

This memorandum summarizes the communications between EPA and affected facilities to discuss EPA's risk and technology review (RTR) for the Wet-formed Fiberglass Mat Source Category under section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).  This memorandum is organized as follows:

 Introduction
 Communications with Industry Trade Groups and Trade Group Members on the Regulatory Process
 Communications with Affected Facilities to Discuss Modeling Inputs
 Industry Review of Modeling Inputs
      Attachments A  -  Communications with Industry Trade Groups
          A.1 Summary of Conference Call between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Association (ARMA), February 16, 2017
          A.2 Action Item from EPA-ARMA Call  -  Plaintiffs and Case # for 13 Category RTR Deadline Suit
          A.3 ARMA Response to EPA Facility List and Additional Fiberglass Questions
          A.4 Draft Facility List with ARMA Input (February 2017)
          A.5	Summary of Conference Call between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Association (ARMA), May 5, 2017
          A.6	Wet-Formed Fiberglass Process Flow Diagram (for ARMA)
      Attachments B - Communications with Affected Facilities to Discuss Modeling Inputs
          B.1 Owens Corning (Aiken Facility) Risk Modelling Inputs Discussion - Meeting Agenda
          B.2 Johns Manville (Etowah and Waterville Facilities) Risk Modelling Inputs Discussion - Meeting Agenda
          B.3 Owens Corning (Fort Smith Facility) Risk Modelling Inputs Discussion - Meeting Agenda
          B.4 CertainTeed/Saint Gobain ADFORS (North Charleston Facility) Risk Modelling Inputs Discussion - Meeting Agenda
      Attachments C  -  Industry Review of Modeling Inputs
      	C.1 GAF Materials Model Inputs - Industry Review Draft
      	C.2 Owens Corning (Aiken Facility) Model Inputs - Industry Review Draft
      	C.3 Owens Corning (Fort Smith Facility) Model Inputs - Industry Review Draft
      	C.4 Johns Manville (Waterville Plant #1) Model Inputs - Industry Review Draft
      	C.5 Johns Manville (Waterville Plant #7) Model Inputs - Industry Review Draft
      	C.6 Johns Manville (Etowah Facility) Model Inputs - Industry Review Draft
      	C.7 CertainTeed/Saint Gobain ADFORS (North Charleston) Model Inputs - Industry Review Draft
      	C.8 Modeling Inputs with Facility Review Comments

 CommunicationS WITH Industry trade groups and trade group members ON THE REGULATORY PROCESS

EPA met with the Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Association (ARMA) and ARMA member companies via teleconference on February 16, 2017 to notify them that EPA had begun work on the RTR for the Wet-Formed Fiberglass Mat source category, provide information on the rulemaking process, and discuss areas where EPA could benefit from additional input from stakeholders. Following the teleconference, EPA provided information requested by ARMA during the call. EPA forwarded a draft list of facilities to ARMA on Feb. 22, 2017. ARMA provided updates to the facility list on March 6, 2017, with following limited exchanges to confirm and clarify updates to the facility list. (The information provided is included in Attachments A.1 through A.4 of this document.)

EPA provided facility-specific National Emissions Inventory (NEI) information to ARMA for distribution to four ARMA member companies (GAF Materials, Certainteed, Johns Manville, and Owens Corning) and subsequently met with ARMA and the member companies via teleconference on May 5, 2017 (see Attachment A.5). EPA explained the process of gathering data for the modeling file, which includes identifying emission units and HAP emissions from NEI data. EPA proposed reviewing a simplified process diagram and the compiled NEI data with each company through individual calls or site visits to confirm the emission units, data, and resolve any follow-up questions. EPA confirmed that it does not intend to send questionnaires to each facility because the inputs for modeling were generally expected to be available from existing sources (e.g., test data, NEI, permits, Google Earth(R)). EPA forwarded a process flow diagram to ARMA on May 8, 2017 to be shared with each of the four companies (see Attachment A.6). EPA met with ARMA via teleconference on February 1, 2018 and February 13, 2018 to provide updates on the status of the RTR proposal.
 COMMUNICATIONS WITH Affected Facilities TO Discuss modeling inputs

The data inputs for modeling include facility identification information, facility configuration information, emission release point information, emissions by pollutant, and control information.  The memorandum, "Wet-formed Fiberglass: Residual Risk Modeling File Documentation" in Docket ID. No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0309 provides additional information regarding modeling inputs and EPA's approach for developing the modeling file. EPA met with facility representatives as described in Table 1 to discuss facility operations, clarify publicly-available data, and confirm any additional data used to inform the modeling file. In some cases, EPA exchanged short follow-up emails with facilities to clarify or confirm this information. Additional materials (i.e., agendas) provided for each conference are included in Attachments B.1 through B.4.

Table 1. Communications Between EPA and Affected Facilities for Compilation of Modeling Inputs
                  Company/Facility Representatives Contacted
                              Affected Facilities
                                     Date
                          Summary of Items Discussed
GAF Materials
Mark McAteer, Plant Manager

Steve Emmons,
Corporate Director of Environmental
GAF Materials (Chester, SC)
May 24, 2017
EPA met with facility representatives on a site visit[1] to clarify the following information: facility emission sources and process flow, emission points and stack information listed in the 2014 NEI, the most current stack test data available, standard operating hours, and startup, shutdown, and malfunction procedures.
Owens Corning
Jesse Edgar, Environmental, Health & Safety Leader
Owens Corning Nonwoven Technology LLC (Aiken, SC)
June 22, 2017
Via teleconference, EPA clarified the following information with facility representatives:  facility emission sources and process flow, emission points and stack information listed in the 2014 NEI, the most current stack test data available, standard operating hours, and startup, shutdown, and malfunction procedures.

Owens Corning Composite Materials (Fort Smith, AR)
July 17, 2017
Via teleconference, EPA clarified the following information with facility representatives: emission points and stack information listed in the 2014 NEI, the most current stack test data available, the type of oxidizer used at the facility, standard operating hours, and startup, shutdown, and malfunction procedures.
Johns Manville
Sara Nuttall, Regional Environmental Manager

Brent Tracy, Senior Director & Associate General Counsel, EHS
Johns Manville  -  Plant #01 (Waterville, OH)
June 29, 2017
Via teleconference, EPA clarified the following information with facility representatives: emission points, stack information, and HAP emissions listed in the 2014 NEI, the most current stack test data available for each facility, standard operating hours, and startup, shutdown, and malfunction procedures.

Johns Manville  -  Waterville 07 (Waterville, OH)

Johns Manville International, Inc.  -  Etowah Facility
(Etowah, Tennessee)

Saint Gobain Corporation
Lauren Alterman, Vice President, Environmental Health and Safety

Melissa Spittler, Environmental, Health, & Safety Manager

John Bedell, General Manager
Certainteed/Saint Gobain Adfors America Inc.
(North Charleston, SC)
July 17, 2017
Via teleconference, EPA clarified the following information with facility representatives: emission points, stack information, and HAP emissions listed in the 2014 NEI, the most current stack test data, standard operating hours, and startup, shutdown, and malfunction procedures.
[1] In lieu of teleconference, EPA conducted a site visit to GAF Materials in Chester, SC on May 24, 2017 to discuss facility operations and modeling inputs. See the memorandum "Summary of Site Visit to GAF Materials, Inc., Chester, SC" in Docket ID. No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0309 for additional information.
 INDUSTRY REVIEW OF MODELING INPUTS

Following facility input and EPA compilation of the modeling file, EPA provided key modeling inputs to each affected source for review and confirmation. EPA prepared facility review files in Microsoft Excel(R) format with fields for facilities to enter or revise information. EPA included the following information in each file:

          Facility identification information: Facility name and associated identification numbers (e.g., EPA Facility Registry System ID and EPA Emissions Inventory System ID), physical address, county name, facility category (major, synthetic minor, or area), North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes, applicable regulatory codes, and annual operating hours.
          Facility configuration information: The assigned emission process group for the wet-formed fiberglass category (i.e., Mat Drying and Curing, or Resin-Binder Application), emission units, and emission processes. For each emission unit, an emission unit identification number and unit description. For each emission process, an assigned process identification number, process description, and applicable standard classification code (SCC).
          Emission release point information: The emission release points assigned to each emission unit and emission process combination. For each emission release point, the emission release point identification number; emission point type (i.e., stack or fugitive) and release parameters (e.g., stack height, diameter, temperature, and velocity or flow rate); and emission point latitude and longitude coordinates. For review of latitude and longitude coordinates, a map of each facility generated from Google Earth(R) identifying the associated release points and assigned coordinates.
          Emissions by pollutant: For each emissions release point, the start and end dates of the emissions period of interest and EPA's pollutant-specific estimate for "actual" emissions (annual emissions released from the facility).
          Control information:  The control measures used for each emission unit and process, including the control status (controlled or uncontrolled) and control measure codes and associated descriptions.
EPA also provided fields in each facility file for the reviewer to provide contact information and any additional comments regarding the modeling inputs. EPA provided review files for each of seven affected sources to facility representatives via email on August 11, 2017. EPA also provided an instructions sheet to assist with completing the review file. These files are included in Attachments C.1 through C.7 of this document. Table 2 of this document provides information regarding the affected facilities, the facility contacts receiving the materials, and a summary of responses and materials provided by the contacts. Following confirmation of the individual changes, EPA updated inputs in the risk modeling file based on the responses received. A copy of the revised modeling inputs with comments and revisions from facilities is provided in Attachment C.8 of this document.
      Table 2. Communications and Responses to Facility Review Materials
                  Company/Facility Representatives Contacted
                              Affected Facilities
                              Response Received

                                     Date
                              Summary of Response
GAF Materials
Mark McAteer, Plant Manager

Steve Emmons,
Corporate Director of Environmental
GAF Materials (Chester, SC)
                                August 17, 2017
No comments on provided materials.
Owens Corning
Jesse Edgar, Environmental, Health & Safety Leader

Paul Lewandowski, Director, Regulatory Law
Owens Corning Nonwoven Technology LLC (Aiken, SC)
                             No response received.

 Owens Corning Composite Materials (Fort Smith, AR)

Johns Manville
Sara Nuttall, Regional Environmental Manager

Brent Tracy, Senior Director & Associate General Counsel, EHS
Johns Manville  -  Plant #01 (Waterville, OH)
August 18, 2017

Provided a revised facility file with stack parameters and latitude and longitude coordinates for an additional stack for the binder application operations.

Johns Manville  -  Waterville 07 (Waterville, OH)

Provided a revised facility file with updated stack diameter, exit gas velocity and exit gas flowrates for the combined regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) and binder application stack.

Johns Manville International, Inc.  -  Etowah Facility
(Etowah, Tennessee)

Provided a revised facility file with parameters for 2 additional stacks for the binder application operation for Line 3301. Updated the emission release point type and revised stack parameters for each of 3 stacks from the regulatory defaults.  Updated the emission release point type and revised stack parameters for the binder application operation for Line 3302 from the regulatory defaults. Provided a photograph of the emission release point for clarification as a two-dimensional (2D) fugitive source. Updated latitude and longitude coordinates from all emission release points.
Saint Gobain Corporation
Lauren Alterman, Vice President, Environmental Health and Safety

Melissa Spittler, Environmental, Health, & Safety Manager
Certainteed/Saint Gobain Adfors America Inc.
(North Charleston, SC)
August 22, 2017
Provided a revised facility file with updated stack parameters for the binder application operations, updated stack height for the Honeycomb Dryer, revised latitude and longitude coordinates for the Honeycomb Dryer, and updated annual operating hours.