[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 231 (Thursday, December 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 74843]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30950]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Percentage Rates of Covered
Aviation Employees for the Period of January 1, 2012, Through December
31, 2012

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA has determined that the minimum random drug and
alcohol testing percentage rates for the period January 1, 2012,
through December 31, 2012, will remain at 25 percent of safety-
sensitive employees for random drug testing and 10 percent of safety-
sensitive employees for random alcohol testing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Vicky Dunne, Office of Aerospace
Medicine, Drug Abatement Division, Program Policy Branch (AAM-820),
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Room 806,
Washington, DC 20591; Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Discussion: Pursuant to 14 CFR 120.109(b), the FAA Administrator's
decision on whether to change the minimum annual random drug testing
rate is based on the reported random drug test positive rate for the
entire aviation industry. If the reported random drug test positive
rate is less than 1.00%, the Administrator may continue the minimum
random drug testing rate at 25%. In 2010, the random drug test positive
rate was 0.503%. Therefore, the minimum random drug testing rate will
remain at 25% for calendar year 2012.
    Similarly, 14 CFR 120.217(c), requires the decision on the minimum
annual random alcohol testing rate to be based on the random alcohol
test violation rate. If the violation rate remains less than 0.50%, the
Administrator may continue the minimum random alcohol testing rate at
10%. In 2010, the random alcohol test violation rate was 0.11%.
Therefore, the minimum random alcohol testing rate will remain at 10%
for calendar year 2012.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you have questions about how the annual
random testing percentage rates are determined please refer to the Code
of Federal Regulations Title 14, Sec.  120.109(b) (for drug testing),
and 120.217(c) (for alcohol testing).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 3, 2011.
Frederick E. Tilton,
Federal Air Surgeon.
[FR Doc. 2011-30950 Filed 11-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 106 (Friday, June 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30072-30073]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11715]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 34292]

Notice of Applications for Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940

May 28, 2021.
    The following is a notice of applications for deregistration under
section 8(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for the month of May
2021. A copy of each application may be obtained via the Commission's
website by searching for the file number, or for an applicant using the
Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling
(202) 551-8090. An order granting each application will be issued
unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested persons may request a
hearing on any application by emailing the SEC's Secretary at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and serving the relevant applicant with a
copy of the request by email, if an email address is listed for the
relevant applicant below, or personally or by mail, if a physical
address is listed for the relevant applicant below. Hearing requests
should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on June 22, 2021, and should
be accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to Rule
0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the nature of the
writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing
on the matter, the reason for the request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification
by writing to the Commission's Secretary at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
ADDRESSES: The Commission<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shawn Davis, Assistant Director, at
(202) 551-6413 or Chief Counsel's Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>; SEC,
Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office, 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549-8010.

A&Q Masters Fund [File No. 811-22859]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. The applicant
has transferred its assets to A&Q Long/Short Strategies Fund LLC., and
on March 31, 2021 made a final distribution to its shareholders based
on net asset value. Expenses of $383,202.32 incurred in connection with
the reorganization were paid by the acquiring fund.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on April 7, 2021.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Schroder Global Series Trust [File No. 811-21364]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On February 25, 2021, applicant made a
liquidating distribution to its shareholders based on net asset value.
Expenses of approximately $54,000 incurred in connection with the
liquidation were paid by the applicant.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on April 21, 2021.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Van Kampen Debt Opportunity Fund [File No. 811-22296]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. Applicant has
never made a public offering of its securities and does not propose to
make a public offering or engage in business of any kind.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on November 23, 2020 and
amended on March 25, 2021.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Van Kampen Global Equity Dividend & Income Fund [File No. 811-22134]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. Applicant has
never made a public offering of its securities and does not propose to
make a public offering or engage in business of any kind.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on November 23, 2020 and
amended on March 25, 2021.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Western Asset Corporate Loan Fund Inc. [File No. 811-08985]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On November
30, 2020, applicant made a liquidating distributions to its
shareholders based on net asset value. Expenses of $66,131 incurred in
connection with the liquidation were paid by the applicant's investment
adviser, or their affiliates
    Filing Date: The application was filed on April 1, 2021.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Western Asset Middle Market Debt Fund Inc. [File No. 811-22734]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On December
22, 2020, applicant made a liquidating distributions to its
shareholders based on net asset value. Expenses of $13,411 incurred in
connection with the liquidation were paid by the applicant.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on March 18, 2021.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Western Asset Variable Rate Strategic Fund Inc. [File No. 811-21609]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order

declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On November
30, 2020, applicant made a liquidating distributions to its
shareholders based on net asset value. Expenses of $66,056 incurred in
connection with the liquidation were paid by the applicant's investment
adviser, or their affiliates.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on April 1, 2021.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-11715 Filed 6-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 17, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63711-63712]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25108]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 17, 2012 /
Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0722; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-188-AD;
Amendment 39-17214; AD 2012-20-08]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. This AD was prompted
by reports of alternating current (AC) generator failures in-service
due to incomplete fusion in the weld joint of the rotor band assembly.
This AD requires inspecting the AC generator to determine the part
number, and replacing the AC generator if necessary. We are issuing
this AD to prevent rotor windings from coming in contact with the
generator housing, which could result in debris contaminating and
potentially blocking the engine oil scavenge system, leading to loss of
oil pressure and an in-flight shutdown of the engine.

DATES: This AD becomes effective November 21, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of November 21,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mazdak Hobbi, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion and Services Branch, ANE-173, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on July 24, 2012 (77 FR
43176). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) states:

    There have been several reports of AC Generator failures in-
service. The root cause has been attributed to an incomplete fusion
in the weld joint of the AC Generator rotor band assembly. If not
rectified, the rotor band may fail allowing the rotor windings to
come in contact with the generator housing. The resulting debris
could contaminate and potentially block the engine oil scavenge
system, leading to loss of oil pressure and an in-flight shutdown of
the engine.
    Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin (SB) 84-24-45 to inspect,
[replace with modified or new AC generator] and re-identify the
affected AC generators to a new part number (P/N) 1152218-6 unit in
order to rectify the problem and ensure integrity of the affected
units.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (77 FR 43176, July 24,
2012) or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed--except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (77 FR 43176, July 24, 2012) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 43176, July 24, 2012).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 83 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $0 per product.
Where the service information lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge
for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators
to be $14,110 or $170 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:

    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (77 FR 43176, July 24, 2012),
the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2012-20-08 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-17214. Docket No. FAA-
2012-0722; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-188-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective November 21,
2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400, -401, and -
402 airplanes; certificated in any category; serial numbers 4001
through 4338 inclusive, with Honeywell alternating current (AC)
generator part number (P/N) 1152218-3, 1152218-4 or 1152218-5
installed.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24: Electrical
Power.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of AC generator failures in-
service due to incomplete fusion in the weld joint of the rotor band
assembly. We are issuing this AD to prevent rotor windings from
coming in contact with the generator housing, which could result in
debris contaminating and potentially blocking the engine oil
scavenge system, leading to loss of oil pressure and an in-flight
shutdown of the engine.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Inspection and Replacement

    Within 6,000 flight hours or 36 months after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first: Inspect the left and right AC
generators to determine if the AC generator has a part number
identified in step 3.B.(2) of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-24-45, dated January 13, 2011, or has
P/N 1152218-3. If an AC generator has a part number identified in
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-24-45, dated January 13, 2011, or has
P/N 1152218-3, before further flight, replace the AC generator with
a modified or new AC generator having P/N 1152218-6, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
84-24-45, dated January 13, 2011.

(h) Parts Installation Prohibition

    After the effective date of this AD, no person may install an AC
generator having P/N 1152218-5, 1152218-4, or 1152218-3 on any
airplane.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 516-794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(j) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2011-22, dated
July 13, 2011; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-24-45, dated
January 13, 2011; for related information.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-24-45, dated January 13,
2011.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt
Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet
http://www.bombardier.com.
    (4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/index.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 4, 2012.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-25108 Filed 10-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 138 (Thursday, July 18, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 34323]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15267]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2019 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2019-0460]

Public Hearings on Liquefied Gas Carriers Transiting Through San
Juan Harbor, San Juan, PR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces two public meetings to receive
comments regarding the safe navigation and mooring of liquefied natural
gas carriers through the San Juan Harbor, San Juan PR.

DATES: The public meetings will be held from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.,
and from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. on July 26, 2019 to provide an
opportunity for verbal comments. Written comments and related material
may also be submitted to Coast Guard personnel specified at that
meeting. All comments and related material submitted after the meeting
must be received by the Coast Guard on or before August 4, 2019.

ADDRESSES: The public meetings will be held at Sheraton Puerto Rico
Hotel and Casino, 200 Convention Boulevard, San Juan, PR 00907, (787)
993-3500.
    Comment submission: You may submit comments associated with docket
number USCG-2019-0460 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have any questions concerning
the meeting, please call or email LCDR Pedro Mendoza, Sector San Juan
Prevention Department, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background and Purpose

    The Coast Guard Sector San Juan and New Fortress Energy will be
hosting public meetings on July 26, 2019 from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.,
and from 5:00 p.m. to 7 p.m., for the general public to provide
comments regarding the proposed adjustment to the current safety zone
established under 33 CFR 165.754, ``Safety Zone: San Juan Harbor, San
Juan, PR''.
    On Dec. 12, 2017, the U.S. Coast Guard received a Letter of Intent
and Waterway Suitability Assessment from New Fortress Energy to
construct and operate the required infrastructure for offloading and
transferring liquefied natural gas at the Army Terminal Turning Basin
in San Juan, Puerto Rico. After reviewing New Fortress Energy's request
and providing recommendations, on September 26, 2018, the Coast Guard
Sector San Juan determined the Port of San Juan is suitable for the
proposed operation.
    These public meetings will allow attendees to submit comments on
the proposed safety zone adjustment. The proposed amendment is intended
to address the operation of LNG gas carriers and add the new facility
within the San Juan Harbor, San Juan, PR.
    We encourage you to participate by submitting comments either
verbally at the meeting or in writing. If you bring written comments to
the meeting, you may submit them to Coast Guard personnel specified at
the meeting to receive written comments. These comments will be
submitted to our online public docket. All comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have provided.
    Comments submitted after the meeting must reach the Coast Guard on
or before August 4, 2019. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your
material cannot be submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact
the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document for alternate instructions.
    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the March 24, 2005, issue of the
Federal Register (70 FR 15086).

Information on Service for Individuals With Disabilities

    For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the public meeting,
contact LCDR Pedro Mendoza at the telephone number or email address
provided under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice.

    Dated: July 12, 2019.
E. P. King,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Juan.
[FR Doc. 2019-15267 Filed 7-17-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 119 (Thursday, June 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33392-33393]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13206]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-92179; File No. 265-33]

Asset Management Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is being provided that the Securities and Exchange
Commission Asset Management Advisory Committee (``AMAC'') will hold a
public meeting on July 7, 2021, by remote means. The meeting will begin
at 11:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public via webcast on the
Commission's website at www.sec.gov. Persons needing special
accommodations to take part because of a disability should notify the
contact person listed below. The public is invited to submit written
statements to the Committee. The meeting will include a discussion of
matters in the asset management industry relating to: (1) The ESG,
Diversity & Inclusion, and Private Investments Subcommittees, including
potential recommendations from those Subcommittees; and (2) the
Evolution of Advice Subcommittee, including a panel discussion.

DATES: The public meeting will be held on July 7, 2021. Written
statements should be received on or before July 6, 2021.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held by remote means and webcast on
www.sec.gov. Written statements may be submitted by any of the
following methods. To help us process and review your statement more
efficiently, please use only one method. At this time, electronic
statements are preferred.

Electronic Statements

     Use the Commission's internet submission form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/other.shtml); or
     Send an email message to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please
include File Number 265-33 on the subject line; or

Paper Statements

     Send paper statements to Vanessa Countryman, Federal
Advisory Committee Management Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions
should refer to File No. 265-33. This file number should be included on
the subject line if email is used. The Commission will post all
statements on the Commission's website at (http://www.sec.gov/comments/265-33/265-33.htm).

    Statements also will be available for website viewing and printing
in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Room 1580,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. For up-to-date information on the availability
of the Public Reference Room, please refer to https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answerspublicdocshtm.html or call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    All statements received will be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christian Broadbent, Senior Special
Counsel, or Jay Williamson, Branch Chief, at<PHONE_NUMBER>, Division
of Investment Management, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-3628.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with Section 10(a) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C.-App. 1, and the regulations
thereunder, Sarah ten Siethoff, Designated Federal Officer of the
Committee, has ordered publication of this notice.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ This notice was issued on June 15, 2021. Due to unexpected
publication schedule changes, earlier advance publication was not
possible.

    Dated: June 15, 2021.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-13206 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: May 15, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 95)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 28032-28033]
[DOCID:fr15my08-5]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2007-0277; Airspace Docket No. 07-AEA-17]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Seneca, PA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule, confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule
published in the Federal Register (73 FR 8595) that establishes Class E
Airspace at Seneca, PA to support a new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global
Positioning System (GPS) Special Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP)
that has been developed for medical flight operations into the
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Northwest Heliport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, June 5, 2008. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under title 1,
Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melinda Giddens, System Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box
20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Confirmation of Effective Date

    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for
comments in the Federal Register on February 14, 2008 (73 FR 8595),
Docket No. FAA-2007 0277; Airspace Docket No. 07-AEA-17. The FAA uses
the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule
where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment.
This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were
anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written
notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received
within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on
June 5, 2008. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice
confirms that effective date.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on April 21, 2008.
Lynda G. Otting,
Acting Manager, System Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. E8-10432 Filed 5-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 95136-95137]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31165]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0333; FRL-9956-15-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Air Emission Standards for Tanks, Surface
Impoundment and Containers (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), ``Air Emission Standards for
Tanks, Surface Impoundment and Containers (40 CFR part 264, subpart CC,
and 40 CFR part 265, subpart CC) (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No. 1593.10, OMB
Control No. 2060-0318), to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). This is a proposed extension of the ICR,
which is currently approved through December 31, 2016. Public comments
were previously requested via the Federal Register (81 FR 26546) on May
3, 2016 during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an
additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller description of the ICR
is given below, including its estimated burden and cost to the public.
An Agency may neither conduct nor sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before January 26,
2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2013-0333, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: Owners and operators of affected facilities are required
to comply with reporting and record keeping requirements for the
General Provisions (40 CFR part 264, subpart A and 40 CFR part 265,
subpart A), as well as for the specific requirements at 40 CFR part
264, subpart CC and 40 CFR part 265, subpart CC. This includes
submitting initial notifications, performance tests and periodic
reports and results, and maintaining records of the occurrence and
duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of
an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system
is inoperative. These reports are used by EPA to determine compliance
with the standards.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Facilities that treat, store, or
dispose of hazardous wastes in tanks, surface impoundments, and
containers.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 264,
subpart CC and 40 CFR part 265, subpart CC).
    Estimated number of respondents: 6,209 (total).
    Frequency of response: Occasionally and semiannually.
    Total estimated burden: 712,000 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $85,900,000 (per year), which includes
$12,400,000 for either annualized capital/startup and/or operation &
maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an adjustment decrease in labor
hours and capital and O&M costs from the most-recently approved ICR.
This is not due to any program changes. The decrease

has occurred because this ICR rounds totals to three significant
figures.

Spencer Clark,
Acting Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-31165 Filed 12-23-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 246 (Monday, December 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77511-77512]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30442]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-71091; File No. SR-FICC-2013-09]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Make the U.S. Department of the
Treasury's Floating Rate Notes Eligible for Netting Service and GCF
Repo[supreg] at FICC's Government Securities Division

December 17, 2013.

I. Introduction

    On October 28, 2013, the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation
(``FICC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') proposed rule change SR-FICC-2013-09 pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\2\ The proposed rule change was published
for comment in the Federal Register on November 14, 2013.\3\ The
Commission received no comment letters. For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is approving the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70831 (Nov. 7, 2013), 78
FR 68496 (Nov. 14, 2013) (SR-FICC-2013-09).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description

    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to make the U.S.
Department of the Treasury (``Treasury Department'') floating rate
notes eligible for the netting service and GCF Repo[supreg] service at
the GSD. Last year, the Treasury Department announced its plan to issue
Treasury notes with a floating rate coupon (``Floating Rate Notes'').
The Floating Rate Notes will be the first new product issued by the
U.S. Treasury since the Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities
(``TIPS'') were introduced in 1997. The Treasury Department anticipates
that the first auction of Floating Rate Notes will occur in January
2014.\4\ FICC's Government Securities Division (``GSD'') is planning to
make Floating Rate Notes eligible for its netting service starting with
the January 2014 auction of the two-year Floating Rate Notes (other
maturities will be issued later).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Press Release, U.S. Department of the Treasury August
2013 Quarterly Refunding Statement of Assistant Secretary Rutherford
(Jul. 31, 2013), available at www.treasury.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to the GCF Repo[supreg] service, Floating Rate Notes
will be included in GSD's existing Treasury Generic CUSIP Numbers.\5\
However, because of their adjustable coupon, Floating Rate Notes will
not be eligible for collateral allocation obligations or substitutions
with respect to the GCF Repo[supreg] Generic CUSIPs representing TIPS,
separate trading of registered interest and principal securities
(``STRIPS''), or fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities issued by
Federal National Mortgage Association (``Fannie Mae''), Federal Home
Loan Mortgage Corporation (``Freddie Mac'') and Government National
Mortgage Association (``Ginnie Mae''). As a result, GSD Rule 20,
Section 3, has been revised to reflect this change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Pursuant to Rule 1 of the GSD Rulebook, (``Definitions''),
the term ``Generic CUSIP Number'' means a Committee on Uniform
Securities Identification Procedures identifying number established
for a category of securities, as opposed to a specific security.
Rule 1 also requires GSD to use separate Generic CUSIP Numbers for
General Collateral Repo Transactions and GCF Repo Transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In order for GSD to process Floating Rate Notes, various
enhancements to FICC's systems and member output have been made in the
following areas:
     Creation and maintenance of a historical database of
reference indices. This data is necessary for determining coupon, which
is used in valuing positions for settlement purposes and

for forward margin and clearing fund calculations.
     Modification of the security database in order for it to
work in conjunction with the floating rate, reset date, reset rate
basis, and spread.
     Modifications to member output formats for both messaging
and end of day machine readable output in order to accommodate the
additional fields.
    GSD will test FICC's enhanced systems with its membership before
the launch of the Floating Rate Notes. This will ensure that members
can properly submit and receive transaction data in connection with the
Floating Rate Notes. GSD has issued several Important Notices to
members about GSD's proposed processing of the Floating Rate Notes and
will continue to do so prior to making Floating Rate Notes eligible for
processing.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ GSD issued Important Notice GOV012.13 on February 23, 2013
and Important Notice GOV056.13 on August 19, 2013. Both Important
Notices provide members with data output guidelines and trade
messaging changes. The notices are available at www.dtcc.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \7\ directs the Commission to
approve a self-regulatory organization's proposed rule change if the
Commission finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \8\
requires, among other things, that the rules of a clearing agency
registered with the Commission be designed to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \9\ because it allows FICC to
provide clearance and settlement services for Floating Rate Notes, as
newly issued government securities, which should in turn reduce the
risks associated with the trading, clearing, and settling of such
securities by FICC members. In so doing, FICC should facilitate the
prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions
in Floating Rate Notes. Moreover, FICC's rule change should help
protect investors and the public interest by allowing the market to
benefit from the risk reducing measures provided by clearing and
settling Floating Rate Notes at FICC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission concludes that the
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act, particularly
the requirements of Section 17A of the Act,\10\ and the rules and
regulations thereunder.

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\11\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-FICC-2013-09) be
and hereby is approved.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \12\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

    For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-30442 Filed 12-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 111 (Thursday, June 9, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35125-35128]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12256]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0603; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-01093-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-1A11 (600), CL-600-2A12
(601), and CL-600-2B16 (601-3A, 601-3R, and 604 Variants) airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by a report that some rudder power
control unit (PCU) load limiters were found in service with the
crimping missing from the end cap; therefore, the pilot command from
the load limiter might not transmit correctly. This proposed AD would
require a one-time inspection of the rudder PCU load limiters for
correct crimping of the end cap, and replacing any defective rudder PCU
load limiter. For certain airplanes, this proposed AD would also
require repetitive testing of the rudder PCU load limiter for correct
functioning, and applicable corrective actions. The FAA is proposing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 25,
2022.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Bombardier
Business Aircraft Customer Response Center, 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road
West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email [email protected]; internet https://www.bombardier.com.
You may view this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0603; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, the
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments
received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations is listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Dowling, Aerospace Engineer,
Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services Section, FAA, New York
ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2022-0603; Project Identifier
MCAI-2021-01093-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
the proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Elizabeth Dowling, Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Systems and
Administrative Services Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is
not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.

Background

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued TCCA AD CF-2021-33, dated October 6,
2021 (also referred to after this as the MCAI), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain

Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-1A11 (600), CL-600-2A12 (601), and CL-
600-2B16 (601-3A, 601-3R, and 604 Variants) airplanes. You may examine
the MCAI in the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0603.
    This proposed AD was prompted by a report that some rudder PCU load
limiters were found in service with the crimping missing from the end
cap; therefore, the pilot command from the load limiter might not
transmit correctly. The FAA is proposing this AD to address defective
rudder PCU load limiters, which could result in incorrect transmission
of the pilot command, and loss of control of the rudder. See the MCAI
for additional background information.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Bombardier has issued the following service information.
     Bombardier Service Bulletin 604-27-039, Revision 01, dated
April 6, 2021.
     Bombardier Service Bulletin 600-0776, dated December 7,
2020.
     Bombardier Service Bulletin 601-0648, dated December 7,
2020.
    This service information describes procedures for a one-time
inspection of the rudder PCU load limiters for correct crimping of the
end cap, and replacing any defective PCU load limiter. These documents
are distinct because they apply to different airplane configurations.
    Bombardier has also released the following service information.
     Bombardier Service Bulletin 605-27-003, dated December 7,
2020.
     Bombardier Service Bulletin 650-27-010, dated December 7,
2020.
    This service information describes procedures for repetitive
testing of certain PCU load limiters for proper functioning and
applicable corrective actions (performing the one-time inspection of
the rudder PCU load limiters for correct crimping of the end cap, and
replacing any defective PCU load limiter). This service information
also describes procedures for a one-time inspection of the rudder PCU
load limiters for correct crimping of the end cap, and replacing any
defective PCU load limiter, which terminates the repetitive tests.
These documents are distinct because they apply to different airplane
configurations. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
and service information referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD
because the FAA evaluated all the relevant information and determined
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
on other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information already described.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 379 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Labor cost                Parts cost           Cost per product           Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 2 work-hours x $85 per hour =              $0  Up to $170...................  Up to $64,430.
 Up to $170.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition replacement that would be required based on the results of
any required inspection. The FAA has no way of determining the number
of aircraft that might need this on-condition action:

                 Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Cost per
              Labor cost                   Parts cost        product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 work-hours x $85 per hour = $850                $50             $900
 (per rudder PCU load limiter)........
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative,

on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2022-0603; Project Identifier MCAI-
2021-01093-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by July 25, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. airplanes certificated in
any category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this
AD.
    (1) Model CL-600-1A11 (600) airplanes having serial numbers (S/
Ns) 1004 through 1085 inclusive.
    (2) Model CL-600-2A12 (601) airplanes having S/Ns 3001 through
3066 inclusive.
    (3) Model CL-600-2B16 (601-3A, 601-3R, and 604 Variants)
airplanes having S/Ns 5001 through 5194 inclusive, 5301 through 5665
inclusive, 5701 through 5988 inclusive, 6050 through 6158 inclusive,
and 6160 through 6162 inclusive.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27, Flight
Controls.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report that some rudder power control
unit (PCU) load limiters were found in service with the crimping
missing from the end cap; therefore, the pilot command from the load
limiter might not transmit correctly. The FAA is proposing this AD
to address defective rudder PCU load limiters, which could result in
incorrect transmission of the pilot command, and loss of control of
the rudder.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspection and Replacement for Certain Airplanes

    At the applicable time specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (2) of
this AD, inspect each rudder PCU load limiter having part number (P/
N) 600-91302-43 or P/N 600-91302-53 for correct crimping of the end
cap, in accordance with paragraph 2.B., Part A, of the
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information
specified in figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD. If the crimping
is missing from any end cap, before further flight, replace the
defective rudder PCU load limiter, in accordance with paragraph
2.C., Part B, of the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable
service information specified in figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this
AD.
    (1) For Model CL-600-1A11 airplanes having S/Ns 1004 through
1085 inclusive; Model CL-600-2A12 airplanes having S/Ns 3001 through
3066 inclusive; and Model CL-600-2B16 airplanes having S/Ns 5001
through 5194 inclusive: Inspect within 800 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD.
    (2) For Model CL-600-2B16 airplanes having S/Ns 5301 through
5665 inclusive: Inspect within 2,200 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP09JN22.008

(h) Repetitive Testing, Inspection, and Replacement for Certain
Airplanes

    For Model CL-600-2B16 airplanes having S/Ns 5701 through 5988
inclusive, 6050 through 6158 inclusive, and 6160 through 6162
inclusive, do the actions specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (2) of
this AD.
    (1) Within 1,000 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD, test each rudder PCU load limiter for correct functioning, in
accordance with paragraph 2.B., Part A, of the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service information specified in
figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD. Repeat the test thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 800 flight hours until the inspection
required by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD has been accomplished. If
any rudder PCU load limiter fails any test, before further flight,
do the inspection specified in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD.
    (2) Within 3,400 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD, inspect each rudder PCU load limiter having P/N 600-91302-43 or
P/N 600-91302-53 for correct crimping of the end cap, in accordance
with paragraph 2.C., Part B, of the Accomplishment Instructions of
the applicable service information specified in figure 1 to
paragraph (g) of this AD. If the crimping is missing from any end
cap, before further flight, replace the defective rudder PCU load
limiter, in accordance with paragraph 2.D., Part C, of the
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information
specified in figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD. Accomplishment of
this inspection terminates the repetitive testing required by
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If
sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight
Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature.

(j) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) TCCA AD CF-2021-33, dated October 6, 2021, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2022-0603.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Elizabeth
Dowling, Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Systems and Administrative
Services Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier Business Aircraft Customer Response Center, 400
C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected]; internet
https://www.bombardier.com. You may view this service information at
the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued on May 31, 2022.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-12256 Filed 6-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 26, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 207)]
[Notices]
[Page 66346-66347]
[DOCID:fr26oc11-105]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities; Requests for Comments:
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection; General
Aviation and Air Taxi Activity and Avionics Survey

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. Respondents to this survey are owners of general aviation
aircraft. This information is used by FAA, NTSB, and other government
agencies, the aviation industry, and others for safety assessment,
planning, forecasting, cost/benefit analysis, and to target areas for
research.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by December 27, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy DePaepe at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
e-mail at: Kathy A. DePaepe @faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0060.
    Title: General Aviation and Air Taxi Activity and Avionics Survey.
    Form Numbers: There are no FAA forms associated with this
collection.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: Title 49, United States Code, empowers the Secretary of
Transportation to collect and disseminate information relative to civil
aeronautics, to study the possibilities for development of air commerce
and the aeronautical industries, and to make long-range plans for, and
formulate policy with respect to, the orderly development and use of
the navigable airspace, radar installations and all other aids for air
navigation. Respondents to this survey are owners of general aviation
aircraft. This information is used by FAA, NTSB, and other government
agencies, the aviation industry, and others for safety assessment,
planning, forecasting, cost/benefit analysis, and to target areas for
research.
    Respondents: Approximately 83,500 owners of general aviation
aircraft.
    Frequency: Information is collected annually.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 20 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 13,000 hours.
    ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms.
Kathy DePaepe, Room 126B, Federal Aviation Administration, AES-200,
6500 S. MacArthur Blvd, Oklahoma City, OK 73169.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to

enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information collection;
and (d) ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the
quality of the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or
include your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this
information collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC on October 20, 2011.
Albert R. Spence,
FAA Assistant Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises
Business Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2011-27628 Filed 10-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 57 (Monday, March 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15231-15232]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05997]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2017-0003; OMB No. 1660-0005]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; National Flood Insurance Program Claims Forms

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will submit the
information collection abstracted below to the Office of Management and
Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The submission will describe the
nature of the information collection, the categories of respondents,
the estimated burden (i.e., the time, effort and resources used by
respondents to respond) and cost, and the actual data collection
instruments FEMA will use.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before April 26, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the proposed information
collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the Desk
Officer for the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection should be made to Director,
Records Management Division, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472-
3100, or email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed information collection
previously published in the Federal Register on January 13, 2017 at 82
FR 4372 with a 60 day public comment period. FEMA received one comment
from an individual requesting to review all forms associated with the
collection. The Records Management Division provided the forms to the
requester. The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) is codified as
42 U.S.C. 4001, et sec. and is authorized by Public Law 90-448 (1968)
and expanded by Public Law 93-234 (1973). The National Flood Insurance
Act of 1968 requires that FEMA provide flood insurance at full
actuarial rates with limited exceptions for certain structures
reflecting the complete flood risk to structures built or substantially
improved on or after the effective date for the initial Flood Insurance
Rate Map (FIRM) for the community, or after December 31, 1974,
whichever is later, so that the risk associated with buildings in
flood-prone areas are borne by those located in such areas and not by
the taxpayers at large. In accordance with Public Law 93-234, the
purchase of flood insurance is mandatory when Federal or federally
related financial assistance is being provided for acquisition or
construction of buildings located, or to be located, within FEMA-
identified special flood hazard areas of communities that are
participating in the NFIP. When flood damage occurs to insured
property, information is collected to report, investigate, and
negotiate in order to settle the claim.

The NFIP Appeals Process

    Section 205 of The Bunning-Bereuter-Blumenauer Flood Insurance
Reform Act (FIRA) of 2004, Public Law 108-264, requires FEMA to
establish by regulation an additional process for the appeal of
decisions of flood insurance claims issued through the NFIP.
Consequently, FEMA published an interim final rule on May 26, 2006 (71
FR 30294) and a final rule on October 13, 2006 (71 FR 60435) codifying
into regulation what was previously an existing informal process to
handle appeals regarding decisions related to coverage, or claims under
the NFIP.

Collection of Information

    Title: National Flood Insurance Program Claims Forms.
    Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-0005.
    FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 086-0-6; Worksheet-Contents-Personal
Property; 086-0-7; Worksheet--Building; 086-0-8; Worksheet--Building
(Continued); 086-0-9; Proof of Loss; 086-0-10; Increased Cost of
Compliance Proof of Loss; 086-0-11; Notice of Loss; 086-0-12; Statement
as to Full Cost of Repair or Replacement under the Replacement Cost
Coverage, Subject to the Terms and Conditions of this Policy (proposed
for removal); 086-0-13; National Flood Insurance Program Preliminary
Report; 086-0-14; National Flood Insurance Program Final Report; 086-0-
15; National Flood Insurance Program Narrative Report; 086-0-16; Cause
of Loss and Subrogation Report; 086-0-17; Manufactured (Mobile) Home/
Travel Trailer Worksheet; 086-0-18; Manufactured (Mobile) Home/Travel
Trailer Worksheet (continued); 086-0-19; Increased Cost of Compliance
(ICC) Adjusters Report; 086-0-20; Adjuster Preliminary Damage
Assessment; 086-0-21; Adjuster Certification Application. NFIP Claims
Appeals Process (Flood Claims Insurance Handbook).
    Abstract: The NFIP appeal process establishes a formal mechanism to
allow NFIP policyholders to appeal the decisions of any insurance
agent, adjuster, insurance company, or any FEMA employee or contractor,
in cases of unsatisfactory decisions on claims, proof of loss, and loss
estimates.
    Affected Public: Individuals, households, farms, businesses, and
other for profit.
    Number of Respondents: 49,373.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 31,737.
    Estimated Cost: The estimated annual cost to respondents for the
hour burden is $1,432,419. There are no recordkeeping, capital, start-
up or maintenance costs associated with this information collection.
The cost to the Federal Government is $4,000,434.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through

the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

    Dated: March 17, 2017.
William H. Holzerland,
Senior Director for Information Management, Office of the Chief
Administrative Officer Mission Support, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2017-05997 Filed 3-24-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-52-P


[Federal Register: May 12, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 92)]
[Notices]
[Page 26987-26988]
[DOCID:fr12my08-34]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8564-8]

Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC): Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the
Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC) on November 19, 1990, to
provide independent advice and counsel to EPA on policy issues
associated with implementation of the Clean Air Act of 1990. The
Committee advises on economic, environmental, technical scientific, and
enforcement policy issues.

Dates and Addresses: Open meeting notice; Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. App. 2
Section 10(a)(2), notice is hereby given that the Clean Air Act
Advisory Committee will hold its next open meeting on Thursday May 29,
2008 from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the Doubletree Hotel Crystal City-
National Airport at 300 Army Navy Drive, in Arlington, Virginia.
Seating will be available on a first come, first served basis. The
Economic Incentives and Regulatory Innovations subcommittee will meet
on May 28, 2008 from 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. The Permits, New Source
Review and Toxics subcommittee will meet on May 28, 2008 from
approximately 12:45 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. The agenda for the CAAAC full
committee meeting on May 29, 2008 will be posted on the Clean Air Act

Advisory Committee Web site at http://www.epa.gov/oar/caaac/.
    Inspection of Committee Documents: The Committee agenda and any
documents prepared for the meeting will be publicly available at the
meeting. Thereafter, these documents, together with CAAAC meeting
minutes, will be available by contacting the Office of Air and
Radiation Docket and requesting information under docket OAR-2004-0075.
The Docket office can be reached by telephoning<PHONE_NUMBER>; FAX 202-
260-4400.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the CAAAC, please contact
Pat Childers, Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. EPA<PHONE_NUMBER>, FAX
(202) 564-1352 or by mail at U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation
(Mail code 6102 A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20004. For information on the Subcommittees, please contact the
following individuals: (1) Permits/NSR/Toxics Integration--Liz Naess,
(919) 541-1892; (2) Economic Incentives and Regulatory Innovations--
Carey Fitzmaurice,<PHONE_NUMBER>; and (3) Mobile Source Technical
Review--John Guy,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Additional Information on these
meetings, CAAAC, and its Subcommittees can be found on the CAAAC Web
site: http://www.epa.gov/oar/caaac/.
    For information on access or services for individuals with
disabilities, please contact Mr. Pat Childers at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>To request accommodation of a disability, please
contact Mr. Childers, preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting,
to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: May 5, 2008.
Pat Childers,
Designated Federal Official, Clean Air Act Advisory Committee, Office
of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. E8-10508 Filed 5-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: September 16, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 178)]
[Notices]
[Page 47631-47633]
[DOCID:fr16se09-99]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60642; File No. SR-ISE-2009-61]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Regarding Exposure of Reserve Orders

September 9, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on August 27, 2009, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(the ``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to amend its rules to adopt an
interpretation to its rules related to the exposure of reserve orders.
The text of the proposed rule change is as follows, with additions in
italics:
Rule 717. Limitations on Orders
    (a) through (g) no change.
Supplementary Material to Rule 717
    .01-.04 no change.
    .05 With respect to the non-displayed reserve portion of a reserve
order, the exposure requirement of paragraphs (d) and (e) are satisfied
if the displayable

portion of the reserve order is displayed at its displayable price for
one second.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    (a) Purpose--The purpose of the proposal is to adopt an
interpretation to ISE Rule 717(d) and (e) to specify that the exposure
requirement contained in these paragraphs is satisfied with respect to
the non-displayed reserve portion of a reserve order if the displayable
portion is displayed at its displayable price for one second. A reserve
order is an order where only a portion of the full size is included in
the Exchange's disseminated quotation.\3\ The displayed size is
executed according to the Exchange's regular priority rules, and is
refreshed with additional volume from the non-displayed portion of the
order. The non-displayed portion of the reserve order is available for
execution only after the exchange's displayed quote is fully exhausted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ ISE Rule 715(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the proposed interpretation, after entering a reserve order,
a member may enter a contra-side order for its own account or a contra-
side order that was solicited from another broker-dealer that would
execute against the displayable and non-displayed portions of the order
so long as the displayable portion of the order was displayed on the
ISE (i.e., the price of the order is at the ISE BBO) for at least one
second. This proposed interpretation is the same as an existing
interpretation to the rule of the Nasdaq Options Market that contains
the same exposure requirements as ISE Rule 717(d) and (e).\4\
Accordingly, the Commission has previously determined that display of
the displayable portion of a reserve order is sufficient to satisfy the
exposure requirements of ISE Rule 717(d) and (e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Nasdaq Rules, Chapter VII, Sec. 12 (Order Exposure
Requirements), Commentary .03.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (b) Basis--The basis under the Act for this proposed rule change is
the requirement under Section 6(b)(5) that an exchange have rules that
are designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism for a free and open
market and a national market system, and in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. In particular, the proposal is the
same as an existing rule of another exchange,\5\ and will provide
members with certainty with respect to the applicable exposure
requirements for reserve orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    This proposed rule change does not significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest, does not impose any
significant burden on competition, and, by its terms, does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such shorter
time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. The Exchange provided the
Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing the
proposed rule change as required by Rule 19b-4(f)(6).\6\ The proposed
rule change is the same as a rule that the Commission has previously
approved for another self-regulatory organization.\7\ For the foregoing
reason, this rule filing qualifies for immediate effectiveness as a
``non-controversial'' rule change under paragraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4
of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \7\ Supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is
consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the
following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2009-61 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2009-61. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of ISE. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You

should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2009-61
and should be submitted on or before October 7, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-22245 Filed 9-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 120 (Friday, June 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 37602]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14800]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 204-3, OMB Control No. 3235-0047, SEC File No. 270-42.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a
request for extension of the previously approved collection of
information discussed below.
    The title for the collection of information is ``Rule 204-3 (17 CFR
275.204-3) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.'' (15 U.S.C.
80b). Rule 204-3, the ``brochure rule,'' requires advisers to deliver
their brochures and brochure supplements at the start of an advisory
relationship and to deliver annually thereafter the full updated
brochure or a summary of material changes to their brochure. The rule
also requires that advisers deliver an amended brochure or brochure
supplement (or just a statement describing the amendment) to clients
only when disciplinary information in the brochure or supplement
becomes materially inaccurate.
    The brochure assists the client in determining whether to retain,
or continue employing, the adviser. The information that Rule 204-3
requires to be contained in the brochure is also used by the Commission
and staff in its enforcement, regulatory, and examination programs.
This collection of information is found at 17 CFR 275.204-3 and is
mandatory.
    The respondents to this information collection are investment
advisers registered with the Commission. The Commission has estimated
that compliance with rule 204-3 imposes a burden of approximately 31
hours annually based on an average adviser having 1,200 clients. Our
latest data indicate that there were 10,754 advisers registered with
the Commission as of January 2, 2013. Based on this figure, the
Commission estimates a total annual burden of 331,456 hours for this
collection of information.
    Rule 204-3 does not require recordkeeping or record retention. The
collection of information requirements under the rule are mandatory.
The information collected pursuant to the rule is not filed with the
Commission, but rather takes the form of disclosures to clients and
prospective clients. Accordingly, these disclosures are not kept
confidential. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following Web site: www.reginfo.gov.
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Thomas Bayer, Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon,
6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or by sending an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days
of this notice.

    Dated: June 17, 2013.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-14800 Filed 6-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


1 Cost Analysis of Mercury Monitoring Techniques. Draft report prepared by Arcadis for Dr. Ruben Deza, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC., November 3, 2003. COST ESTIMATES FOR MERCURY EMISSIONS MONITORING The cost information gathered in this document is largely based on documents generated by Arcadis Inc., on November 2003, for the Clean Air Markets Division, specifically the " Cost Analysis of Mercury Monitoring Techniques" 1, which is also in the CAMR docket; a cost analysis performed by MACTEC Inc.; and additional information obtained by the Agency in the development of the rule.

This paper provides an overview of the cost information and provides an estimate of the monitoring costs, focusing on the utility boilers that would be required to monitor mercury emissions under the CAMR.

In developing these calculations, EPA considered comments from utility sources and monitoring system vendors. The paper assumes that utility sources will take advantage of those monitoring components already installed as part of complying with other rules under the Clean Air Act, such as CEMS shelters, platforms, flow meters, etc. Therefore, such equipment is not not included in this paper. In addition, it is estimated that no major structural modifications are necessary for access or support equipment, and that sufficient on site power is available to operate additional mercury monitoring equipment.

The paper addresses monitoring costs on the basis of the main options reflected by the proposed regulation and that are likely to be relied on by sources for purposes of complying with the cap and trade rule.

Methodology Several monitoring options and cut off levels were chosen in an attempt to structure the cost analysis. The analysis relies on the data available from the 1999 Mercury Information collection Request ( ICR). This ICR provided mercury emission information on a total of 1120 utility sources, and based on this information a cumulative mercury distribution curve was developed.

Estimates were then developed for units using the Low Mass Emissions ( LME) approach representing one percent of the cumulative mercury emissions in the distribution curve. The LME provision represents a more flexible monitoring option were qualifying sources would not be required to use CEMS or sorbent traps but instead would be required to once a year stack testing and continuous flow measurements. From the emissions distribution curve, 228 low emitting sources would have the LME option.

A second group of sources, corresponding to those emitting between 1% and 5% of the cumulative mercury emissions, would be allowed to use a variation of the LME option, which differs from the first one in that it requires semi annual stack testing instead of annually. A total of 207 units would be able to use this option.

Based on available cost information, including that in the ARCADIS study, the Agency estimates that the stack testing provision costs will average about $ 5,500 each. An additional $ 1,500 annual are estimated for technical calculations, labor and other associated expenses. This would bring the annual expenditure per unit to about $ 7,000 for LME units in the first group, and about $ 12,500 for the ones in the second group.

For CEMS, there are two major components to be considered, capital costs and operational costs. Based on a survey of 11 manufacturers, Arcadis estimated an average capital cost of $ 60,000. In addition, the analysis assumes that each source would purchase a Hovocal or Mercal unit to generate ionic mercury, which is necessary for CEMS calibration. The approximate cost of either instrument is $ 10,000. Based on this, the capital cost is estimated at about $ 70,000.

The operational costs can also be broken into two components, i. e., routine maintenance and operation and quality assurance/ control procedures. Based on discussions with industry, these costs are estimated at $ 87,000.

For units using a sorbent trap, in compliance with the final draft rule, the system would include a carbon trap with a three section cartridge: a primary capture cartridge, backup for breakthough, and a portion for spiking for QA/ QC, and two carbon traps would be run in parallel for one week runs. The costs for a trap system is estimated at $ 8,500. Capital costs including the installation of the complete system is estimated at about $ 20,000. The operational costs can be broken down in three components: routine operational costs, laboratory analysis costs, and QA/ QC procedures, and are estimated at about $ 113,000.

The Agency estimates that about 50 percent of the sources not using LME procedures will use each of the other two available monitoring technologies. Based on the ICR data, the number of units able to use one monitoring option or the other are :

° 1% of cumulative mercury distribution curve: 228 units use LME 1 approach ° 5% of cumulative mercury distribution curve: 207 units use LME 2 approach ° The rest of the units use evenly CEMS and sorbent traps methodologies: ° 342 use CEMS and 343 use sorbent traps Based on the number of units with options to use the various monitoring approaches, a number of scenarios is presented in the following table. Table 1 Option Capital Costs ($ 1000) Annual Operating Costs ($ 1000) Annualized capital costs ($ 1000) Annualized costs ($ 1000) Number of Units Total Annualized Costs ($ 1000)

1% 0 7.0 7.0 7.0 228 1,596 5% 0 12.5 12.5 12.5 207 2,588 CEMS 70 87.0 8.4 95.4 342 32,627 Sorbent Traps 20 113,0 2.4 115.4 343 39,582 Totals 76,393 Then, the estimated annual impact of the measure is $ 76,392,500.