[Federal Register: June 7, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 108)]
[Notices]
[Page 32189-32190]
[DOCID:fr07jn10-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0001]

Joint Meeting of the Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory
Committee and the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee;
Notice of Meeting

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will
be open to the public.
    Name of Committees: Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory
Committee and the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committees: To provide advice and
recommendations to the agency on FDA's regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on July 13, 2010, from 8
a.m. to 6 p.m. and on July 14, 2010, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: Hilton Washington DC North/Gaithersburg, The Ballrooms,
620 Perry Pkwy., Gaithersburg, MD. The hotel telephone number is 301-
977-8900.
    Contact Person: Paul Tran, c/o Melanie Whelan, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 6100, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002, FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>, to reach by telephone before
June 8, 2010, please call<PHONE_NUMBER>; to reach by telephone after
June 8, 2010, please call<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-
0572 in the Washington, DC area), codes<PHONE_NUMBER> and<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Please call the Information Line for up-to-date information on this
meeting. A notice in the Federal Register about last minute
modifications that impact a previously announced advisory committee
meeting cannot always be published quickly enough to provide timely
notice. Therefore, you should always check the agency's Web site and
call the appropriate advisory committee hot line/phone line to learn
about possible modifications before coming to the meeting.
    Agenda: On both days, the committees will focus primarily on the
cardiovascular safety of AVANDIA (rosiglitazone maleate) Tablets,
GlaxoSmithKline, a drug approved for blood glucose control in adults
with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Data specific to rosiglitazone to be
presented will include results from the Rosiglitazone Evaluated for
Cardiac Outcome and Regulation of Glycemia in Diabetes (RECORD) Trial,
observational data, health claims data, and a meta-analysis of
controlled clinical trials. In addition, the FDA will present its meta-
analysis of several trials of ACTOS (pioglitazone hydrochloride)
Tablets, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc., another
thiazolidinedione for the same indication, in response to public
documents comparing the safety of rosiglitazone to pioglitazone based
on different meta-analyses performed on each of these two drugs.
    FDA intends to make background material available to the public no
later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post
the background material on its Web site prior to the meeting, the
background material will be made publicly available at the

location of the advisory committee meeting, and the background material
will be posted on FDA's Web site after the meeting. Background material
is available at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/Calendar/
default.htm. Scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee link.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee.
Written submissions may be made to the contact person on or before June
28, 2010. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between
approximately 8:15 a.m. and 9:15 a.m. on July 14, 2010. Those desiring
to make formal oral presentations should notify the contact person and
submit a brief statement of the general nature of the evidence or
arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed
participants, and an indication of the approximate time requested to
make their presentation on or before June 18, 2010. Time allotted for
each presentation may be limited. If the number of registrants
requesting to speak is greater than can be reasonably accommodated
during the scheduled open public hearing session, FDA may conduct a
lottery to determine the speakers for the scheduled open public hearing
session. The contact person will notify interested persons regarding
their request to speak by June 21, 2010.
    Persons attending FDA's advisory committee meetings are advised
that the agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical
outlets.
    FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with
physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special
accommodations due to a disability, please contact Paul Tran at least 7
days in advance of the meeting.
    FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our Web site at http://www.fda.gov/
AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm111462.htm for procedures
on public conduct during advisory committee meetings.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: June 2, 2010.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010-13533 Filed 6-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register: October 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 196)]
[Notices]
[Page 62532-62533]
[DOCID:fr12oc10-68]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]

Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice

October 1, 2010.
    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of
the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission
decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-
the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested
proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of
the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any
oral communication.
    Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional
file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional record of the
proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited
communication and any responses thereto should become a part of the
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication, and may
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant
such a request only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any
person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with
Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
    Exempt off-the-record communications are included in the decisional
record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
    The following is a list of off-the-record communications recently
received by the Secretary of the Commission. The communications listed
are grouped by docket numbers in ascending order. These filings are
available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or
may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using
the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number, excluding the last three
digits, in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC, Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Docket No.                    File date                    Presenter or requester
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prohibited:
    1. ER08-386-000......................          9-8-10  Peter C. Luchsinger.
Exempt:
    1. CP09-35-000.......................         9-14-10  Elizabeth Kendziora.
    2. CP10-477-000......................         9-22-10  Hon. John Barrow.
    3. CP10-494-000......................         9-30-10  Ashley and Stuart Moberley.
    4. CP10-494-000......................         9-30-10  Jackie and Victoria Truelove.
    5. Project No. 606-000...............         9-16-10  Hon. Wally Herger.
    6. Project No. 2621-000..............         9-29-10  Jim Seay.\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ E-mail exchange with FERC staff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2010-25557 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 98 (Friday, May 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 29234]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12433]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-3554-000]

Glacial Energy of California, Inc.; Supplemental Notice That
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section
204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Glacial Energy of California, Inc.'s application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is June 2, 2011.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 13, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-12433 Filed 5-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 3, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66242-66245]
[FR Doc No: 2019-26055]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-87635; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2019-059]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.;
Suspension of and Order Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To
Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To Introduce a Small
Retail Broker Distribution Program

November 26, 2019.

I. Introduction

    On October 1, 2019, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend the EDGX fee schedule to introduce a
Small Retail Broker Distribution Program (the ``Program''). The
proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with the
Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\3\ The proposed
rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on
October 17, 2019.\4\ The Commission received no comment letters
regarding the proposed rule change. Under Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the
Act,\5\ the Commission is hereby: (i) Temporarily suspending the
proposed rule change; and (ii) instituting proceedings to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86678 (October 11,
2019), 84 FR 55624 (``Notice'').
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule to introduce a
pricing program that would allow certain Distributors \6\ to purchase
top of book market data from the Exchange at discounted fees.
Currently, the Exchange offers two top of book data feeds that provide
quote and trade information. First, the Exchange charges a fee of
$1,500 per month for external distribution of EDGX Top Feed \7\ and a
fee of $4 per month for each Professional User and $0.10 per month for
each Non-Professional User.\8\ Second, the Exchange charges $5,000 per
month for external distribution of Cboe One Summary Feed \9\ and a Data
Consolidation Fee of $1,000 per month. The Exchange also charges a fee
$10 per month for each Professional User and $0.25 for each Non-
Professional User.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ A Distributor of an Exchange market data product is any
entity that receives the Exchange market data product directly from
the Exchange or indirectly through another entity and then
distributes it internally or externally to a third party. See EDGX
Fee Schedule.
    \7\ EDGX Top is an uncompressed data feed that offers top of
book quotations and execution information based on equity orders
entered in the Exchange. See Notice, supra note 4, 84 FR at 55624.
    \8\ A ``Professional User'' of an Exchange market data product
is any user other than a Non-Professional User. See EDGX Fee
Schedule. A ``Non-Professional User'' of an Exchange market data
product is a natural person or qualifying trust that uses data only
for personal purposes and not for any commercial purpose and, for a
natural person who works in the United States, is not: (i)
Registered or qualified in any capacity with the Commission, the
Commodities Futures Trading Commission, any state securities agency,
any securities exchange or association, or any commodities or
futures contract market or association; (ii) engaged as an
``investment adviser'' as that term is defined in Section 202(a)(11)
of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 (whether or not registered or
qualified under that Act); or (iii) employed by a bank or other
organization exempt from registration under federal or state
securities laws to perform functions that would require registration
or qualification if such functions were performed for an
organization not so exempt; or, for a natural person who works
outside of the United States, does not perform the same functions as
would disqualify such person as a Non-Professional User if he or she
worked in the United States. Id.
    \9\ Cboe One Summary Feed is a data feed that offers top of book
quotations and execution information based on equity orders
submitted to the Exchange and its affiliated equities exchanges,
i.e., Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc., Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc., and Cboe
BYX Exchange, Inc. See Notice, supra note 4, 84 FR at 55624-25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the Exchange's proposal, Distributors that qualify for the
Program would be charged a discounted fee of $750 per month for the
distribution of EDGX Top Feed and $3,500 per month for the distribution
of Cboe One Summary Feed. Distributors that qualify for the Program
would also be charged a discounted Data Consolidation Fee of $350 for
Cboe One Summary Feed. The Exchange would continue to charge the
current Professional and Non-Professional User fees for both data
feeds.
    In order to qualify for the Program, a Distributor must meet the
following criteria for each respective data feed: (i) Distributor is a
broker-dealer distributing EDGX Top Data Feed or Cboe One Summary Feed
to Non-Professional Data Users with whom the broker-dealer has a
brokerage relationship; (ii) more than 50% of the Distributor's total
subscriber population must consist of Non-Professional subscribers,
inclusive of any subscribers not receiving EDGX Top Data/Cboe One
Summary Feed; and (iii) Distributor distributes EDGX Top Data/Cboe One
Summary Feed to no more than 5,000 Non-Professional Data Users.

III. Suspension of the Proposed Rule Change

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,\10\ at any time within
60 days of the date of filing of a proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Act,\11\ the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend the change in the rules of a self-regulatory
organization (''SRO'') if it appears to the Commission that such action
is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection
of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
As discussed below, the Commission believes a temporary suspension of
the proposed rule change is necessary and appropriate to allow for
additional analysis of the proposed rule change's consistency with the
Act and the rules thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A fee change to introduce the Program was originally filed on
August 1, 2018. That proposal, CboeEDGX-2019-048, was published for
comment in the Federal Register on August 20, 2019.\12\ The Commission
received no comment letters regarding the proposed rule change. On
September 30, 2019, the Division of Trading and Markets (the
``Division''), acting on behalf of the Commission by delegated
authority, issued an order temporarily suspending CboeEDGX-2019-048
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act \13\ and simultaneously
instituting proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \14\ to
determine whether to approve or disapprove that proposal.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86678 (August 14,
2019), 84 FR 43246.
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87163 (September
30, 2019), 84 FR 53203.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange continues to assert that the proposed fees for the
Program ``are reasonable as they represent a significant cost reduction
for smaller, primarily regional, retail brokers that provide top of
book data from EDGX and its affiliated exchanges to their retail
investor clients.'' \16\ The Exchange also asserts that the ``proposed
fees are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory as the proposed fee
structure is designed to decrease the price and increase the
availability of U.S. equities market data to retail investors.'' \17\
Finally, the Exchange states that while the proposed fees are limited
to smaller firms that distribute data to no more than 5,000 Non-
Professional data users, it does not believe that the proposed fees for
the Program are inequitable or unfairly discriminatory.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Notice, supra note 4, 84 FR at 55627.
    \17\ Id.
    \18\ See id. at 55628.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    When exchanges file their proposed rule changes with the
Commission, including fee filings like the Exchange's present proposal,
they are required to provide a statement supporting the proposal's
basis under the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable
to the exchange.\19\ The instructions to Form 19b-4, on which exchanges
file their proposed rule changes, specify that such statement ``should
be sufficiently detailed and specific to support a finding that the
proposed rule change is consistent with [those] requirements.'' \20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See 17 CFR 240.19b-4 (Item 3 entitled ``Self-Regulatory
Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for,
the Proposed Rule Change'').
    \20\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Among other things, exchange proposed rule changes are subject to
Section 6 of the Act, including Sections 6(b)(4), (5), and (8), which
requires the rules of an exchange to: (1) Provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable fees among members, issuers, and other persons
using the exchange's facilities; \21\ (2) perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, protect investors
and the public interest, and not be designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers; \22\
and (3) not impose any burden on competition not necessary or

appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In temporarily suspending the Exchange's fee change, the Commission
intends to further consider whether the establishment of the Program is
consistent with the statutory requirements applicable to a national
securities exchange under the Act. In particular, the Commission will
consider whether the proposed rule change satisfies the standards under
the Act and the rules thereunder requiring, among other things, that an
exchange's rules provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
fees among members, issuers, and other persons using its facilities;
not permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers or
dealers; and do not impose any burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4), (5), and (8), respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, the Commission finds that it is appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of investors, and otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, to temporarily suspend the
proposed rule changes.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ For purposes of temporarily suspending the proposed rule
change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove the
Proposed Rule Change

    The Commission is instituting proceedings pursuant to Sections
19(b)(3)(C) \26\ and 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \27\ to determine whether
the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. Institution
of proceedings does not indicate that the Commission has reached any
conclusions with respect to any of the issues involved. Rather, the
Commission seeks and encourages interested persons to provide
additional comment on the proposed rule change to inform the
Commission's analysis of whether to disapprove the proposed rule
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C). Once the Commission temporarily
suspends a proposed rule change, Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act
requires that the Commission institute proceedings under Section
19(b)(2)(B) to determine whether a proposed rule change should be
approved or disapproved.
    \27\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act,\28\ the Commission is
providing notice of the grounds for possible disapproval under
consideration:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Section 6(b)(4) of the Act, which requires that the rules
of a national securities exchange ``provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its
members and issuers and other persons using its facilities,'' \29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, which requires, among other
things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be ``designed
to perfect the operation of a free and open market and a national
market system'' and ``protect investors and the public interest,'' and
not be ``designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers,'' \30\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, which requires that the rules
of a national securities exchange ``not impose any burden on
competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes
of [the Act].'' \31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, the proposal establishes new discounted fees for
Distributors of the Exchange's two top of book data feeds. The
Commission notes that the Exchange's statements in support of the
proposed rule change are general in nature and lack detail and
specificity. The Exchange states that it operates in a highly
competitive environment, and its ability to price top of book data
products is constrained by (i) competition among other national
securities exchanges that offer similar data products to their
customers; and (ii) real-time consolidated data disseminated by the
securities information processors.\32\ The Exchange also states that
the proposed Program would reduce fees charged to small retail brokers
that provide access to two top of book data products, the EDGX Top Feed
and the Cboe One Summary Feed.\33\ The Exchange notes that it has one
distributor that qualifies and is taking advantage of the Program's
pricing,\34\ and notes that Program's fees are often lower than
Nasdaq's fees.\35\ The Exchange also notes that ``[w]hile there is no
`exact science' to choosing one eligibility threshold compared to
another, the Exchange believes that having more Non-Professional Data
Users across a firm's entire business . . . is indicative of a broker-
dealer that is primarily engaged in the business of serving retail
investors.'' \36\ The Exchange states that larger broker-dealers and/or
vendors benefit from lower subscriber fees and enterprise licenses,
that Distributors that provide data to more than 5,000 Non-Professional
data users ``enjoy cost savings compared to competitor products,'' and
that the proposed fees would ``ensure that small retail brokers that
distribute top of book data to their retail investor customers could
also benefit from reduced pricing . . .'' \37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See Notice, supra note 4, 84 FR at 55625-26.
    \33\ See id. at 55626.
    \34\ See id. at 55626-28.
    \35\ See id. at 55628-29.
    \36\ Id. at 55627.
    \37\ Id. at 55628.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the Commission's Rules of Practice, the ``burden to
demonstrate that a proposed rule change is consistent with the [Act]
and the rules and regulations issued thereunder . . . is on the [SRO]
that proposed the rule change.'' \38\ The description of a proposed
rule change, its purpose and operation, its effect, and a legal
analysis of its consistency with applicable requirements must all be
sufficiently detailed and specific to support an affirmative Commission
finding,\39\ and any failure of an SRO to provide this information may
result in the Commission not having a sufficient basis to make an
affirmative finding that a proposed rule change is consistent with the
Act and the applicable rules and regulations.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ Rule 700(b)(3), Commission Rules of Practice, 17 CFR
201.700(b)(3).
    \39\ See id.
    \40\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is instituting proceedings to allow for additional
consideration and comment on the issues raised herein, including as to
whether the proposed fees are consistent with the Act, and
specifically, with its requirements that exchange fees be reasonable
and equitably allocated; be designed to perfect the mechanism of a free
and open market and the national market system, protect investors and
the public interest, and not be unfairly discriminatory; or not impose
an unnecessary or inappropriate burden on competition.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4), (5), and (8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Commission's Solicitation of Comments

    The Commission requests written views, data, and arguments with
respect to the concerns identified above as well as any other relevant
concerns. Such comments should be submitted by December 24, 2019.
Rebuttal comments should be submitted by January 7, 2020. Although
there do not appear to be any issues relevant to approval or
disapproval which would be facilitated by an oral presentation of
views, data, and arguments, the Commission will consider, pursuant to
Rule 19b-4, any

request for an opportunity to make an oral presentation.\42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). Section 19(b)(2) of the Act grants the
Commission flexibility to determine what type of proceeding--either
oral or notice and opportunity for written comments--is appropriate
for consideration of a particular proposal by an SRO. See Securities
Acts Amendments of 1975, Report of the Senate Committee on Banking,
Housing and Urban Affairs to Accompany S. 249, S. Rep. No. 75, 94th
Cong., 1st Sess. 30 (1975).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission asks that commenters address the sufficiency and
merit of the Exchange's statements in support of the proposal, in
addition to any other comments they may wish to submit about the
proposed rule change.
    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the proposed rule change, including whether the
proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2019-059 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2019-059. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2019-059 and should be
submitted on or before December 24, 2019. Rebuttal comments should be
submitted by January 7, 2020.

VI. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the
Act,\43\ that File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2019-059 be and hereby is,
temporarily suspended. In addition, the Commission is instituting
proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be
approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\44\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \44\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57) and (58).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-26055 Filed 12-2-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 129 (Friday, July 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31682-31683]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14272]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2016-0354]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Extension of a
Currently-Approved Information Collection: Accident Recordkeeping
Requirements

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA),
FMCSA announces its plan to submit the Information Collection Request
(ICR) described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
its review and approval. FMCSA is requesting approval to extend a
currently-approved ICR entitled ``Accident Recordkeeping
Requirements.'' This ICR relates to Agency requirements that motor
carriers maintain a record of accidents involving their commercial
motor vehicles (CMVs). On March 22, 2017, FMCSA published a Federal
Register notice announcing an increase in the Agency's estimate of the
total information-collection (IC) burden of this requirement and asked
for public comment. No comments were received. The regulatory burden
has not changed, but the population of motor carriers has increased,
both organically and because the Agency now includes the population of
intrastate motor carriers in this ICR.

DATES: Please send your comments by August 7, 2017. OMB must receive
your comments by this date to act quickly on the ICR.

ADDRESSES: All comments should reference Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) Docket Number FMCSA-2016-0354. Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on the proposed information
collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the attention
of the OMB Desk Officer, DOT/FMCSA, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC
20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert F. Schultz, FMCSA Driver
and Carrier Operations Division, DOT, FMCSA, West Building 6th Floor,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: 202-366-
4325. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Accident Recordkeeping Requirements.
    OMB Control Number: 2126-0009.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved information
collection.
    Respondents: Motor Carriers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 886,122 motor carriers.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 120,522.
    Estimated Time per Response: 18 minutes.
    Expiration Date: July 31, 2017.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 36,157 hours [120,522 accidents x 18
minutes per response/60 minutes in an hour].
    Definition: ``Accident'' means an occurrence involving a CMV
operating on a public road that results in: (1) A fatality, (2) bodily
injury to a person who, because of the injury, immediately receives
medical treatment away from the scene of the accident, or (3) one or
more motor vehicles being towed from the scene due to disabling damage
(49

CFR 390.5 and as well as in section 390.5T while in effect).

Background

    Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 390.15(b),
requires motor carriers to make certain specified records and
information pertaining to CMV accidents available to an authorized
representative or special agent of the FMCSA upon request or as part of
an inquiry. Motor carriers are required to maintain an ``accident
register'' consisting of information concerning all ``accidents''
involving their CMVs (49 CFR 390.15(b)(see ``Definition: Accident,''
above). The following information must be recorded for each accident:
Date, location, driver name, number of injuries, number of fatalities,
and whether certain dangerous hazardous materials were released. In
addition, the motor carrier must maintain copies of all accident
reports required by insurers or governmental entities. Motor carriers
must maintain this information for three years after the date of the
accident. Section 390.15 does not require motor carriers to submit any
information or records to FMCSA or any other party.
    This ICR supports the DOT strategic goal of safety. By requiring
motor carriers to gather and record information concerning CMV
accidents, FMCSA is strengthening its ability to assess the safety
performance of motor carriers. This information is a valuable resource
in Agency initiatives to prevent, and reduce the severity of, CMV
crashes.
    The Agency increases its burden estimate from 26,700 to 36,157
hours. The regulatory requirement has not changed for accident
recordkeeping. The increase is due to two revised estimates: (1) The
population of motor carriers subject to the regulation, from 520,000 to
886,122, and (2) the number of reportable accidents, from 89,000 to
120,522. The Agency has amended the population of motor carriers to
include the accident recordkeeping burden of intrastate motor carriers.
In past estimates, the Agency had taken the position that the accident
recordkeeping of intrastate carriers occurred as a result of State law.
However, the OMB has directed FMCSA to include such intrastate
activities in its IC estimates, so we do so in this burden estimate
statement for the first time. The Agency estimates that 886,122 motor
carriers are subject to accident register requirements (508,367
interstate and 377,755 intrastate motor carriers). The Agency further
estimates that the number of accidents that must be reported by
intrastate or interstate motor carriers is 120,522.
    The Agency received no comments to the 60-day Federal Register
notice published on March 22, 2017 (82 FR 14793).

Public Comments Invited

    FMCSA requests that you comment on any aspect of this information
collection, including: (1) Whether the proposed collection is necessary
for FMCSA to perform its functions, (2) the accuracy of the estimated
burden, (3) ways for the FMCSA to enhance the quality, usefulness, and
clarity of the collected information, and (4) ways that the burden
could be minimized without reducing the quality of the collected
information.

    Issued under the authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.87 on: June 28,
2017.
G. Kelly Regal,
Associate Administrator for Office of Research and Information
Technology.
[FR Doc. 2017-14272 Filed 7-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 182 (Monday, September 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 57006]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23556]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-0001]

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and
recommendations to the Agency on FDA's regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on December 9, 2015, from 8
a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: FDA White Oak Campus, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31
Conference Center, the Great Room (Rm. 1503), Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002. Answers to commonly asked questions including information
regarding special accommodations due to a disability, visitor parking,
and transportation may be accessed at: http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm408555.htm.
    Contact Person: Cindy Hong, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
31, Rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, FAX: 301-847-
8533<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-
800-741-8138<PHONE_NUMBER> in the Washington, DC area). A notice in the
Federal Register about last minute modifications that impact a
previously announced advisory committee meeting cannot always be
published quickly enough to provide timely notice. Therefore, you
should always check the Agency's Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm and scroll down to the appropriate
advisory committee meeting link, or call the advisory committee
information line to learn about possible modifications before coming to
the meeting.
    Agenda: The committee will discuss biologics license application
761033, reslizumab for injection, submitted by Teva Pharmaceutical
Industries, Ltd., for the proposed indication to reduce exacerbations,
relieve symptoms, and improve lung function in adults and adolescents
12 years of age and above, with asthma and elevated blood eosinophils,
who are inadequately controlled on inhaled corticosteroids.
    FDA intends to make background material available to the public no
later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post
the background material on its Web site prior to the meeting, the
background material will be made publicly available at the location of
the advisory committee meeting, and the background material will be
posted on FDA's Web site after the meeting. Background material is
available at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/Calendar/default.htm. Scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee meeting
link.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee.
Written submissions may be made to the contact person on or before
November 24, 2015. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled
between approximately 1 p.m. and 2 p.m. Those individuals interested in
making formal oral presentations should notify the contact person and
submit a brief statement of the general nature of the evidence or
arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed
participants, and an indication of the approximate time requested to
make their presentation on or before November 16, 2015. Time allotted
for each presentation may be limited. If the number of registrants
requesting to speak is greater than can be reasonably accommodated
during the scheduled open public hearing session, FDA may conduct a
lottery to determine the speakers for the scheduled open public hearing
session. The contact person will notify interested persons regarding
their request to speak by November 17, 2015.
    Persons attending FDA's advisory committee meetings are advised
that the Agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical
outlets.
    FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with
disabilities. If you require accommodations due to a disability, please
contact Cindy Hong at least 7 days in advance of the meeting.
    FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm111462.htm for procedures
on public conduct during advisory committee meetings.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: September 15, 2015.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-23556 Filed 9-18-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 118 (Friday, June 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35421-35422]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15229]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

 In the Matter of Enterologics, Inc., Midas Medici Group
Holdings, Inc., and SEFE, Inc., Order of Suspension of Trading

June 17, 2015.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') that there is a lack of current and accurate
information concerning the securities of Enterologics, Inc. (``ELGO
\1\'') (CIK No. 1483731), a revoked Nevada corporation whose principal
place of business is listed as St. Paul, Minnesota because it is
delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not
filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2013. As of June 10, 2015, ELGO's common shares
were quoted on OTC Link (previously ``Pink Sheets'') operated by OTC
Markets Group Inc. (``OTC Link''). On November 18, 2014, the
Commission's Division of Corporation Finance sent a delinquency letter
to ELGO at the address shown in its then-most recent filing in the
Commission's EDGAR system requesting compliance with its periodic
filing requirements, which ELGO failed to receive because the letter
was not deliverable as addressed. ELGO thus failed to maintain a valid
address on file with the Commission as required by Commission rules
(Rule 301 of Regulation S-T, 17 CFR 232.301 and Section 5.4 of EDGAR
Filer Manual). To date, ELGO has failed to cure its delinquencies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The short form of the issuer's name is also its ticker
symbol.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') that there is a lack of current and accurate
information concerning the

securities of Midas Medici Group Holdings, Inc. (``MMED'') (CIK No.
1392448), a void Delaware corporation whose principal place of business
is listed as New York, New York because it is delinquent in its
periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic
reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2012. As of June 10, 2015, MMED's common stock was quoted on OTC Link.
On June 6, 2014, the Commission's Division of Corporation Finance sent
a delinquency letter to MMED at the address shown in its then-most
recent filing in the Commission's EDGAR system requesting compliance
with its periodic filing requirements, which MMED received on June 11,
2014. To date, MMED has failed to cure its delinquencies.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') that there is a lack of current and accurate
information concerning the securities of SEFE, Inc. (``SEFE'') (CIK No.
1321573), a defaulted Nevada corporation whose principal place of
business is listed as Phoenix, Arizona because it is delinquent in its
periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic
reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2012. As of June 10, 2015, SEFE's common stock was quoted on OTC Link.
On September 16, 2014, the Commission's Division of Corporation Finance
sent a delinquency letter to SEFE at the address shown in its then-most
recent filing in the Commission's EDGAR system requesting compliance
with its periodic filing requirements, which SEFE received on September
19, 2014. To date, SEFE has failed to cure its delinquencies.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered,
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that
trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended
for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on June 17, 2015, through 11:59 p.m.
EDT on June 30, 2015.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-15229 Filed 6-17-15; 11:30 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14190-14192]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05218]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0173; Airspace Docket No. 19-AAL-59]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of United States Area Navigation (RNAV) Route
T-223; Cape Newenham, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend United States Area Navigation
(RNAV) route T-223 in the vicinity of Cape Newenham, AK in support of a
large and comprehensive T-route modernization project for the state of
Alaska.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 28, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone:
(800) 647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2022-0173; Airspace Docket No. 19-AAL-59 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC, 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of FAA Order JO 7400.11F at NARA, email:
[email protected] or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher McMullin, Rules and
Regulations Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would expand the availability of RNAV in Alaska and
improve the efficient flow of air traffic within the National Airspace
System (NAS) by lessening the dependency on ground based navigation.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2022-0173; Airspace Docket No. 19-AAL-59) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to FAA Docket No. FAA-2022-0173; Airspace Docket No. 19-AAL-59.'' The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified comment
closing date will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may

be changed in light of comments received. All comments submitted will
be available for examination in the public docket both before and after
the comment closing date. A report summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed
in the docket.

Availability of NPRM

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Western Service Center, Operations
Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA 98198.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective
September 15, 2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F
lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service
routes, and reporting points.

Background

    In 2003, Congress enacted the Vision 100--Century of Aviation
Reauthorization Act (Pub. L., 108-176), which established a joint
planning and development office in the FAA to manage the work related
to the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen). Today,
NextGen is an ongoing FAA-led modernization of the nation's air
transportation system to make flying safer, more efficient, and more
predictable.
    In support of NextGen, this proposal is part of a larger and
comprehensive T-route modernization project in the state of Alaska. The
project mission statement states: ``To modernize Alaska's Air Traffic
Service route structure using satellite based navigation Development of
new T-routes and optimization of existing T-routes will enhance safety,
increase efficiency and access, and will provide enroute continuity
that is not subject to the restrictions associated with ground based
airway navigation.'' As part of this project, the FAA evaluated the
existing Colored airway structure for: (a) Direct replacement (i.e.,
overlay) with a T-route that offers a similar or lower Minimum Enroute
Altitude (MEA) or Global Navigation Satellite System Minimum Enroute
Altitude (GNSS MEA); (b) the replacement of the Colored airway with a
T-route in an optimized but similar geographic area, while retaining
similar or lower MEA; or (c) removal with no route structure (T-route)
restored in that area because the value was determined to be
insignificant.
    The aviation industry/users have indicated a desire for the FAA to
transition the Alaskan enroute navigation structure away from
dependency on Non-Directional Beacons (NDB), and move to develop and
improve the RNAV route structure. Due to Cape Newenham, AK, (EHM) NDB
being on the list for decommissioning, the FAA proposes to amend RNAV
route T-223 by replacing EHM with the ZIKNI, AK, waypoint (WP). The
proposal would also remove the NONDA, AK, Fix from the legal
description since it is not a turn point along the route.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to amend RNAV
route T-223 in the vicinity of Cape Newenham, AK in support of a large
and comprehensive T-route modernization project for the state of
Alaska. The proposed route is described below.
    T-223: The FAA proposes to amend T-223 by replacing the navigation
point EHM with newly established ZIKNI, AK WP. Additionally the NONDA,
AK, Fix will not be included in the legal description due to it not
being a turn point along the route. The rest of the route will remain
unchanged.
    United States Area Navigation Routes are published in paragraph
6011 of FAA Order JO 7400.11F dated August 10, 2021 and effective
September 15, 2021, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
The RNAV route listed in this document would be published subsequently
in FAA Order JO 7400.11.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this proposed rule,
when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6011 United States Area Navigation Routes
* * * * *

T-223 ZIKNI, AK to Anchorage, AK (TED) [Amended]

ZIKNI, AK                                       WP                             (Lat. 58[deg]39'21.68'' N, long. 162[deg]04'13.87'' W)
Dillingham, AK (DLG)                            VOR/DME                        (Lat. 58[deg]59'39.24'' N, long. 158[deg]33'07.99'' W)
Anchorage, AK (TED)                             VOR/DME                        (Lat. 61[deg]10'04.32'' N, long. 149[deg]57'36.51'' W)

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 8, 2022.
Scott M. Rosenbloom,
Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2022-05218 Filed 3-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: July 16, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 135)]
[Notices]
[Page 34608-34609]
[DOCID:fr16jy09-87]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60264; File No. SR-CBOE-2009-045]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its CBOE Stock Exchange (``CBSX'') Fees
Schedule To Establish Regulatory and Inactivity Fees

July 8, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on July 1, 2009, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its CBOE Stock Exchange (``CBSX'')
Fees Schedule to establish regulatory and inactivity fees. The text of
the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site
(http://www.cboe.org/legal), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its CBSX Fees Schedule to impose new
CBSX regulatory fees \3\ and an inactivity fee. \4\ Currently, CBOE
charges no fee to CBSX Trading Permit Holders who either apply for CBOE
to act as their designated examining authority or for whom CBOE acts as
the designated examining authority. However, processing these
applications and acting as the regulatory authority can be costly and
time-intensive, so it is necessary that CBOE be compensated for these
expenses so that CBOE can pay the costs associated with them. The
proposed Inactivity Fee will ensure that Trading Permit Holders are
sufficiently active on CBSX (CBSX is only authorized to issue 100 CBSX
Trading Permits). The Exchange believes the regulatory fees are
reasonable in that they help offset costs incurred in connection with
CBSX regulation. The Exchange also believes the inactivity fee is
appropriate since CBSX is only permitted to issue a finite number of
Trading Permits and when

permits are occupied by users that don't engage in meaningful trading
on CBSX, it could be at the expense of a potential permit holder that
might be willing to add meaningful liquidity to the CBSX marketplace.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Commission notes that the proposed regulatory fees are
as follows:
    Initial Regulatory Review Fee: This fee is charged to any CBSX
Trading Permit Holder applicant that applies for a CBSX Trading
Permit that, if approved, would result in CBOE serving as the
Trading Permit Holder's designated examining authority. The amount
of the fee is $2,500.
    Monthly Regulatory Fee: This fee is charged to any CBSX Trading
Permit Holder for whom CBOE acts as the Trading Permit Holder's
designated examining authority. The amount of the fee is $2,500 per
month.
    \4\ The Commission notes that the proposed inactivity fee is as
follows:
     This fee is charged to any CBSX Trading Permit Holder that
trades less than an average of 50,000 shares per day over a calendar
month period. This fee will be calculated monthly. The amount of
this fee is $5,000 per month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''), \5\ in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) \6\ of the Act in particular, in that
it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges among CBOE members and other persons
using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The proposed rule change is designated by the Exchange as
establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge, thereby
qualifying for effectiveness on filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) \7\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
\8\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \8\ 17 C.F.R. 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is
consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the
following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-CBOE-2009-045 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CBOE-2009-045. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of CBOE. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-CBOE-2009-045 and should be
submitted on or before August 6, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. E9-16858 Filed 7-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: August 2, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 148)]
[Notices]
[Page 42404-42405]
[DOCID:fr02au07-82]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. ER07-1058-000]

Glacial Energy of Maryland, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

July 26, 2007.
    Glacial Energy of Maryland, Inc. (Glacial) filed an application for
market-based rate authority, with an accompanying tariff. The proposed
market-based rate tariff provides for the sale of energy and capacity
at market-based rates. Glacial also requested waivers of various
Commission regulations. In particular, Glacial requested that the
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Glacial.
    On July 18, 2007, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director,
Division of Tariffs and Market Development--West, granted the requests
for blanket approval under Part 34 (Director's Order). The Director's
Order also stated that the Commission would publish a separate notice
in the Federal Register establishing a period of time for the filing of
protests. Accordingly, any person desiring to be heard concerning the
blanket approvals of issuances of securities or assumptions of
liability by Glacial should file a protest with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214 (2004).

    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests is
August 17, 2007.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition to such blanket
approvals by the deadline above, Glacial is authorized to issue
securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a guarantor,
indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of another
person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some lawful
object within the corporate purposes of Glacial, compatible with the
public interest, and is reasonably necessary or appropriate for such
purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by
continued approvals of Glacial's issuance of securities or assumptions
of liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the

docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may
be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-14961 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 151 (Monday, August 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38300-38301]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16768]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0273; FRL-9980-85]

Pesticide Product Registration; Receipt of Applications for New
Uses

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has received an application to register a new use for a
pesticide product containing a currently registered active ingredient.
Pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), EPA is hereby providing notice of receipt and opportunity to
comment on this application.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 5, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Goodis, Registration Division
(RD) (7505P), main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
[email protected]. The mailing address is: Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that

includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does
not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for
inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part
2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.

II. Registration Applications

    EPA has received an application to register a new use for a
pesticide product containing a currently registered active ingredient.
Pursuant to the provisions of FIFRA section 3(c)(4) (7 U.S.C.
136a(c)(4)), EPA is hereby providing notice of receipt and opportunity
to comment on this application. Notice of receipt does not imply a
decision by the Agency on this application.

New Uses

    EPA registration numbers: 59639-107, 59639-138, 59639-202. Docket
ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0273. Applicant: The Interregional Research
Project No. 4 (IR-4), Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 500
College Road East, Suite 201 W, Princeton, NJ 08540. Active ingredient:
etoxazole. Product type: insecticide. Proposed use: sweet corn.
Contact: RD.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: July 24, 2018.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2018-16768 Filed 8-3-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


MEMORANDUM

TO:	Docket for Reconsideration of 2008 Ozone NAAQS (Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172)

RE:	Meetings with OMB on draft Ozone Reconsideration Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking

	On December 10, 2009 EPA and OMB discussed OMB’s comments on the
draft Ozone Reconsideration Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) sent to
OMB on October 20, 2009.  In response to requests from OMB, EPA made the
following changes to the notice:  deletion of text that included details
of the history of the exchange between OMB and EPA just prior to
issuance of the final 2008 Ozone NAAQS rule, and clarification of the
nature of the Administrator’s discretion in selecting a primary
standard that is requisite to protect public health with an adequate
margin of safety.  These changes were included in a version of the draft
Ozone NPR sent to OMB on December 16, 2009.

On December 29, 2009 EPA and OMB met to discuss OMB’s comments on the
December 16 version of the draft Ozone NPR.  A representative from CEA
also participated in the discussion.  OMB raised several points on which
they requested the following changes to the notice:  additional
discussion of the benefits associated with the proposed secondary
standard; solicitation of comment on the incremental benefits of the
proposed secondary standard relative to the benefits of the secondary
standard set in 2008; deletion of remaining text that included details
of the history of the exchange between OMB and EPA just prior to
issuance of the final 2008 Ozone NAAQS rule; acknowledgement that there
were differing views on the interpretation of the Adams studies and
EPA’s reanalysis of data from the Adams (2006) study; further
clarification of the nature of the Administrator’s discretion in
selecting a primary standard that is requisite to protect public health
with an adequate margin of safety; and solicitation of comment on the
incremental benefits of a primary standard set within the proposed range
of levels relative to the benefits associated with the primary standard
set in 2008.  These changes were included in a version of the draft
Ozone NPR sent to OMB on December 30, 2009.

On January 5, 2009 EPA and OMB met to discuss OMB’s comments on the
December 30 version of the draft Ozone NPR.  OMB requested two changes.
The first concerned the description of EPA’s use of the Adams studies
in its rationale for the March 2008 decision.  The second addressed the
characterization of the Administrator’s decision in concluding that
important and significant risks to public health are likely to occur at
the level of the 2008 primary standard and the description of the
evidence considered by the Administrator in reaching this conclusion.
EPA made changes to address these comments and sent the revisions to OMB
in an e-mail on January 5, 2010.   These changes were also included in
the final version of the draft Ozone NPR sent to OMB later that day.