[Federal Register: November 16, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 221)]
[Notices]
[Page 66773-66774]
[DOCID:fr16no06-67]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Application for Non-Project Use of Project Lands and
Waters and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

November 8, 2006.
    Take notice that the following application has been filed with the
Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Non-Project Use of Project Lands and Waters.
    b. Project No: 1494-300.
    c. Date Filed: October 24, 2006.
    d. Applicant: Grand River Dam Authority (GRDA).
    e. Name of Project: The Pensacola Project.
    f. Location: The project is located on the Grand (Neosho) River in
Craig, Delaware, Mayes, and Ottawa Counties, Oklahoma. The proposed
non-project use would occupy project lands and waters on Grand Lake O'
the Cherokees in Sections 9 and 15, Township 24 North, and in Range 23
East in Delaware County.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r)
and 799 and 801.

    h. Applicant Contact: Gretchen Zumwalt-Smith, General Counsel;
Grand River Dam Authority; P.O. Box 409; Vinita, OK 74301; (918) 256-
5545.
    i. FERC Contact: Any questions on this notice should be addressed
to Lesley Kordella at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    j. Deadline for filing comments and or motions: December 8, 2006.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with: Ms.
Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Please include the project
number (P-1494-300) on any comments or motions filed. Comments,
protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link.
The Commission strongly encourages e-filings.
    k. Description of Request: GRDA requests Commission approval to
permit Peter Boylan, Shangri-La Marina Group, LLC to install 170 boat
slips, 4 fuel slips, 4 personal watercraft (PWC) fueling ramps, 322 PWC
lifts, and a ship store, fuel service, boat ramp and a breakwater for
commercial purposes. In addition, GRDA requests Commission approval to
permit the applicant to dredge two ponds located on the Shangri-La golf
course adjacent to the lake and install four docks with 57 boat slips
and 50 PWC slips for use by the Shangri-La residential community. The
proposed action would require a waiver of current GRDA policies to
allow docks to exceed the 125-foot maximum length and slips to be
perpendicular to the shoreline.
    l. Location of the Application: This filing is available for review
at the Commission or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at
http://www.ferc.gov, using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket

number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,

contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filings must
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS'', ``PROTEST'', OR ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as
applicable, and the Project Number of the particular application to
which the filing refers. A copy of any motion to intervene must also be
served upon each representative of the Applicant specified in the
particular application.
    p. Agency Comments: Federal, State, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described applications. A copy of the
applications may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant.
If an agency does not file comments within the time specified for
filing comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of
an agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's
representatives.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-19331 Filed 11-15-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


WARREN COUNTY, KENTUCKY Warren County is located in south central Kentucky. Warren County is located approximately 60 miles northeast of Nashville, Tennessee. Warren 2 Warren County, Kentucky Warren County is located on the I 65 South interstate corridor and is located in Pennyrile region of Kentucky.

Geography/ Topography Warren County, Kentucky is situated in south central Kentucky. Warren County has a land area of 545 square miles. The county is located south of Mammoth Cave National Park which is located in Edmonson County, Kentucky.

Meteorological Information Due to the close proximity of Nashville, Tennessee, meteorological data from Nashville was used for this south central Kentucky area. Wind speed/ wind direction information for Nashville shows that the majority of the time for the period 1988   1992, the wind in the Warren County area came from the southwest and typically from 7 10 knots. ( See figure 1 A) The mean high temperature for July for the area from 1961 through 1990 was 90 ° F, the mean low was 69 ° F. The mean precipitation for the same period was 4.0 inches.

Planning The authority for air quality planning in the Warren County area resides with the Kentucky Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet. Transportation planning for Warren County is performed by the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet.

Air Monitoring For the 2000   2002 monitoring period, the ozone monitor ( 21 227 0008) located in Warren County shows an 8 hour design value of .086 parts per million ( ppm) which would be classified as a county in violation of the standard. ( See table 1 A)

Population Based on projections to 2001 from 2000 census data, there are 93,232 persons living in Warren County. That represents approximately 171 persons per square mile. The population of Warren County is approximately 37% rural with the remaining 63% living in incorporated areas. The largest city in Warren County is Bowling Green. ( See table 1 C) 3 Warren County's population from 1990 through 2000 increased by approximately 19% ( 77,720 to 92,522). The population is further expected to increase by an additional 17% between 2000 and 2010. ( See table 1 B)

Air Emissions Point source VOC emissions from Warren County were estimated at 4.86 tons per summer day ( tpsd) in 2001. The Warren County point source NOx emissions were estimated to be 0.10 tpsd. ( See table 1 D)

Point sources located within Warren County are subject to PSD requirements, CTG RACT requirements, Maximum Achievable Control Technology ( MACT) requirements for sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants, and New Source Performance Standards ( NSPS).

Onroad mobile source VOC emissions within Warren County were estimated to be 7.08 tpsd in 2001. Onroad mobile source NOx emissions were estimated to be 11.47 tpsd. ( See table 1 D)

Commuting traffic from other counties into Warren County is minimal, and the commuting traffic from Warren County into other counties is minimal.

Commuting Classifications Not Significant 0 10% Minimal 11 30% High 31 50% Significant 51% or more 4 2001 VOC Contribution ( tons per summer day)

2001 NOx Contribution ( tons per summer day) 4.86 7.08 0 5 10 15 20 25 Warren Mobile Point 0.1 11.47 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Warren Mobile Point 5 Conclusion and Recommendation The monitoring data and growth patterns presented indicate that Warren County, Kentucky, should be designated nonattainment for the 8 hour standard. 6 Warren County, Kentucky Figure 1 A Wind Rose Patterns Figure 1 B 2001 Warren County VOC and NOx Emissions ( tons per summer day)

11.94 11.57 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Warren VOC NOx 7 Table 1 A Ozone Design Values ( parts per million)

Monitor 2000 2001 2002 Design Value Warren .088 .081 .090 .086 Table 1 B Warren County Kentucky Population Growth Data County 1990 2000 % Growth 1990   2000 2010 % Growth 2000   2010 Warren 77,720 92,522 19.0% 108,054 16.8%

Table 1 C 2001 Estimated Warren County Kentucky Population Kentucky Estimated Population Warren County 93,232 Table 1 D 2001 Warren County VOC and NOx Emissions ( tons per summer day)

VOC NOx County Point Mobile Total Point Mobile Total Warren 4.86 7.08 11.94 0.10 11.47 11.57


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50880-50883]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20223]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0582; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-065-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014-03-
05, for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-700-1A10 airplanes. AD 2014-
03-05 currently requires modification of the air data probes and
sensors. Since we issued AD 2014-03-05, we have determined that
additional airplanes are affected by the unsafe condition. This
proposed AD would add airplanes to the applicability. We are proposing
this AD to detect and correct an unannunciated failure of two pitot
static probe heaters, which could affect controllability of the
airplane in icing conditions.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 10,
2014.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com.You may
view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0582; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assata Dessaline, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0582;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-065-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On January 22, 2014, we issued AD 2014-03-05, Amendment 39-17742
(79 FR 10331, February 25, 2014). AD 2014-03-05 requires actions
intended to address an unsafe condition on certain Bombardier, Inc.
Model BD-700-1A10 airplanes.
    Since we issued AD 2014-03-05, Amendment 39-17742 (79 FR 10331,
February 25, 2014), we have determined that airplanes have been
inadvertently omitted from the applicability; there are additional
airplanes that are on the FAA supplemental type certificate, but not
the Canadian supplemental type certificate, that are subject to the
unsafe condition. For airplanes equipped with any electrical wiring
heater current/brake temperature monitor unit (HBMU) installed in
accordance with any FAA supplemental type certificate specified in
table 2 of paragraph 1.A., ``Effectivity,'' of Bombardier Service
Bulletin 700-30-021, Revision 01, dated November 21, 2012, the
modification of the air data probes and sensors must be done to address
the unsafe condition. We have coordinated this issue with Transport
Canada Civil Aviation.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

``Contacting the Manufacturer'' Paragraph in This Proposed AD

    Since late 2006, we have included a standard paragraph titled
``Airworthy Product'' in all MCAI ADs in which the FAA develops an AD
based on a foreign authority's AD.
    The MCAI or referenced service information in an FAA AD often
directs the owner/operator to contact the manufacturer for corrective
actions, such as a repair. Briefly, the Airworthy Product paragraph
allowed owners/operators to use corrective actions provided by the
manufacturer if those actions were FAA-approved. In addition, the
paragraph stated that any actions approved by the State of Design
Authority (or its delegated agent) are considered to be FAA-approved.
    In an NPRM having Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-101-AD (78 FR
78285, December 26, 2013), we proposed to prevent the use of repairs
that were not specifically developed to correct the unsafe condition,
by requiring that the repair approval provided by the State of Design
Authority or its delegated agent specifically refer to the FAA AD. This
change was intended to clarify the method of compliance and to provide
operators with better visibility of repairs that are specifically
developed and approved to correct the unsafe condition. In addition, we
proposed to change the phrase ``its delegated agent'' to include a
design approval holder (DAH) with State of Design Authority design
organization approval (DOA), as applicable, to refer to a DAH
authorized to approve required repairs for the proposed AD.
    One commenter to the NPRM having Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-
101-AD (78 FR 78285, December 26, 2013) stated the following: ``The
proposed wording, being specific to repairs, eliminates the
interpretation that Airbus messages are acceptable for approving minor
deviations (corrective actions) needed during accomplishment of an AD
mandated Airbus service bulletin.''
    This comment has made the FAA aware that some operators have
misunderstood or misinterpreted the Airworthy Product paragraph to
allow the owner/operator to use messages provided by the manufacturer
as approval of deviations during the accomplishment of an AD-mandated
action. The Airworthy Product paragraph does not approve messages or
other information provided by the manufacturer for deviations to the
requirements of the AD-mandated actions. The Airworthy Product
paragraph only addresses the requirement to contact the manufacturer
for corrective actions for the identified unsafe condition and does not
cover deviations from other AD requirements. However, deviations to AD-
required actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17, and anyone may request
the approval for an alternative method of compliance to the AD-required
actions using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    To address this misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the
Airworthy Product paragraph, we have changed the paragraph and retitled
it ``Contacting the Manufacturer.'' This paragraph now clarifies that
for any requirement in this proposed AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the actions must be accomplished using a method

approved by the FAA, Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), or
Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO).
    The Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph also clarifies that, if
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature. The DAO signature indicates that the data and information
contained in the document are TCCA-approved, which is also FAA-
approved. Messages and other information provided by the manufacturer
that do not contain the DAO-authorized signature approval are not TCCA-
approved, unless TCCA directly approves the manufacturer's message or
other information.
    This clarification does not remove flexibility previously afforded
by the Airworthy Product paragraph. Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never intended for required actions. This
is also consistent with the recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by identifying those actions in
manufacturers' service instructions that are ``Required for
Compliance'' with ADs. We continue to work with manufacturers to
implement this recommendation. But once we determine that an action is
required, any deviation from the requirement must be approved as an
alternative method of compliance.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 79 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    The actions that are required by AD 2014-03-05, Amendment 39-17742
(79 FR 10331, February 25, 2014), and retained in this proposed AD take
about 35 work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per
work-hour. Required parts cost about $0 per product. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of the actions that were required by AD
2014-03-05 is $2,975 per product.
    We also estimate that it would take about 35 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $0 per
product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $235,025, or $2,975 per product.
    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This proposed regulation is
within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in
this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
AD 2014-03-05, Amendment 39-17742 (79 FR 10331, February 25, 2014), and
adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2014-0582; Directorate Identifier
2014-NM-065-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by October 10, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2014-03-05, Amendment 39-17742 (79 FR 10331,
February 25, 2014).

(c) Applicability

    (1) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-700-1A10
airplanes, certificated in any category, equipped with any
electrical wiring heater current/brake temperature monitor unit
(HBMU) installed in accordance with any FAA supplemental type
certificate specified in table 1 and table 2 of paragraph 1.A.,
``Effectivity,'' of Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-30-021, Revision
01, dated November 21, 2012.
    (2) For airplanes on which the applicable service request for
product support action (SRPSA) specified in table 3 and table 4 of
paragraph 1.A., ``Effectivity,'' of Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-
30-021, Revision 01, dated November 21, 2012, has been incorporated,
the requirements of this AD have been met.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 30, Ice and Rain
Protection.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report that the manufacturer has
determined that some completion centers used the HBMU logic circuit
to control the line voltage of the drain mast heaters. This same
logic circuit is also used to control the line voltage of the number
2 pitot static (PS) probe heater. Since the drain mast heaters are
connected in parallel with the number 2 PS probe heater circuit, a
number 2 PS probe heater failure may not be detected by the fault
monitoring capabilities of the HBMU. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct an unannunciated failure of two PS probe heaters,
which could affect controllability of the airplane in icing
conditions.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Modification

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2014-03-05,

Amendment 39-17742 (79 FR 10331, February 25, 2014). For airplanes
equipped with any electrical wiring HBMU installed in accordance
with any FAA supplemental type certificate specified in table 1 of
paragraph 1.A., ``Effectivity,'' of Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-
30-021, Revision 01, dated November 21, 2012: Within 800 flight
hours or 15 months after April 1, 2014 (the effective date of AD
2014-03-05), whichever occurs first, modify the air data probes and
sensors, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-30-021, Revision 01, dated November
21, 2012.

(h) New Modification

    For airplanes equipped with any electrical wiring HBMU installed
in accordance with any FAA supplemental type certificate specified
in table 2 of paragraph 1.A., ``Effectivity,'' of Bombardier Service
Bulletin 700-30-021, Revision 01, dated November 21, 2012: Within
800 flight hours or 15 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, modify the air data probes and sensors, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 700-30-021, Revision 01, dated November 21, 2012.

(i) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) or (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-30-
021, dated August 28, 2012, which is not incorporated by reference
in this AD.

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO,
ANE-170, Engine and Propeller Directorate, FAA; or Transport Canada
Civil Aviation (TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must
include the DAO-authorized signature.

(k) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2012-32, dated December
13, 2012, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-0582.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 15, 2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-20223 Filed 8-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 212 (Friday, November 1, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 58711]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23840]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. AD19-20-000 and ER02-2001-000]

Electric Quarterly Report Users Group Meeting and Electric
Quarterly Reports

    On September 17, 2019, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission) issued a notice that Commission staff will hold an
Electric Quarterly Report (EQR) Users Group meeting on December 4,
2019. The meeting will take place from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. (EST) in
the Commission Meeting Room at 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426. All interested persons are invited to attend. For those unable
to attend in person, access to the meeting will be available via
webcast.
    Commission staff is hereby supplementing the September 17, 2019
notice with the agenda for discussion. During the meeting, Commission
staff and EQR users will discuss potential improvements to the EQR
program and the EQR filing process. While discussion topics are
outlined in the agenda, suggestions for additional discussion topics
may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Please note that matters pending before the Commission and subject
to ex parte limitations cannot be discussed at this meeting.
    Due to the nature of the discussion, those interested in
participating are encouraged to attend in person. All interested
persons (whether attending in person, via webcast, or telephone) are
asked to register http://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/registration/12-04-19-form.asp. There is no registration fee. Anyone with internet access can
listen to the meeting by navigating to the FERC website Calendar of
Events (https://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx?View=listview), locating the EQR Users Group Meeting on
the Calendar, and clicking on the link to the Event Details and
selecting webcast. The webcast will allow persons to listen to the
meeting. In the event you would also like to participate in the meeting
dialogue by phone, please select the telephone option when registering.
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please
send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll free 1-866-208-
3372 (voice) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a FAX to<PHONE_NUMBER> with
the required accommodations.
    For more information about the EQR Users Group meeting, please
contact Jeff Sanders of the Commission's Office of Enforcement at (202)
502-6455 or send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: October 25, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-23840 Filed 10-31-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: November 8, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 216)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 63098-63100]
[DOCID:fr08no07-2]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-0158; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-081-AD;
Amendment 39-15253; AD 2007-23-07]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; EADS SOCATA Model TBM 700 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    This Airworthiness Directive (AD) results from one report of
main landing gear wheel attaching nut partly unscrewed on a TBM 850
what has generated a loss of braking and which could lead to a wheel
loss. The investigation revealed that this incident was due to a
wheel axle machining issue, concerning a few production batches.

This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: This AD becomes effective November 28, 2007.
    On November 28, 2007, the Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this
AD.
    We must receive comments on this AD by December 10, 2007.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov.
 Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
; or in person at the Docket Management Facility

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Albert J. Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri, 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The Direction g[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'aviation civile (DGAC),
which is the aviation authority for France, has issued Emergency AD No.
CN UF-2007-015--EADS SOCATA--TBM 700, dated September 20, 2007
(referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    This Airworthiness Directive (AD) results from one report of
main landing gear wheel attaching nut partly unscrewed on a TBM 850
what has generated a loss of braking and which could lead to wheel
loss. The investigation revealed that this incident was due to a
wheel axle machining issue, concerning a few production batches.

    The MCAI requires you to inspect the main landing gear (MLG) wheel
axles to determine that batch number. If the batch number is one
affected by this AD, you are required to inspect the axle for
conformity and replace the lockwasher if necessary.
    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    EADS SOCATA has issued TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin
Number SB 70-151, Amendment 1, dated September 2007. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all information provided by the State of Design Authority and
determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.

    We might have also required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
described in a separate paragraph of the AD. These requirements take
precedence over those copied from the MCAI.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule, because the
non-conformity of the MLG wheel axles could cause the MLG attaching nut
to unscrew, which could result in loss of braking ability and/or the
wheel could detach from the airplane. Therefore, we determined that
notice and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are
impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment
effective in fewer than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-0158; Directorate
Identifier 2007-CE-081-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov
, including any personal information you provide. We

will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2007-23-07 EADS SOCATA: Amendment 39-15253; Docket No. FAA-2007-
0158; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-081-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective November
28, 2007.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Models TBM 700 airplanes, serial numbers
205, 240, and 244 through 408, that:
    (1) Are certificated in any category; and
    (2) Have main landing gear (MLG) wheel axles with the following
batch numbers installed: D67690 CZ49133, D67690 CZ52790, D67690
CZ58448, D67690 CZ62189, D67690 CZ64034, D67690 CZ66207, D67690
CZ68039, D67690 CZ70959, D67690 CZ72081, D67690 CZ72975, D67690
CZ77612, or D67690 CZ78218.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 32: Landing
Gear.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    This Airworthiness Directive (AD) results from one report of
main landing gear wheel attaching nut partly unscrewed on a TBM 850
what has generated a loss of braking and which could lead to wheel
loss. The investigation revealed that this incident was due to a
wheel axle machining issue, concerning a few production batches.
    The MCAI requires you to inspect the main landing gear (MLG)
wheel axles to determine the batch number. If the batch number is
one affected by this AD, you are required to inspect the axle for
conformity and replace the lockwasher if necessary.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) Before further flight after the effective date of this AD,
inspect the MLG wheel axles to determine the batch number in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions in EADS SOCATA TBM
Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin Number SB 70-151, Amendment 1,
dated September 2007.
    (2) Before further flight after the inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, if the MLG wheel axle shows a batch
number listed in paragraph (c)(2) of this AD, inspect the axle for
conformity in accordance with Messier-Dowty Technical Instruction
No. CS/ 1020/07, Issue 1, dated September 11, 2007, as referenced in
EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin Number SB 70-
151, Amendment 1, dated September 2007.
    (i) No further action is required if the axle is in conformance.
    (ii) Before further flight for non-conforming axles, replace the
original lockwasher with a new lockwasher, part number (P/N)
SKW40716-118R, and mark the axle using indelible ink with the
inscription ``SB70-151-32'' in accordance with Messier-Dowty
Technical Instruction No. CS/ 1020/07, Issue 1, dated September 11,
2007, as referenced in EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin Number SB 70-151, Amendment 1, dated September 2007.
    (3) As of the effective date of this AD, do not install any MLG
wheel axle with a batch number specified in paragraph (c)(2) of this
AD unless it is inspected in accordance with Messier-Dowty Technical
Instruction No. CS/

1020/07, Issue 1, dated September 11, 2007, as referenced in EADS
SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin Number SB 70-151,
Amendment 1, dated September 2007, and a new lockwasher is installed
if necessary.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to Direction g[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'aviation
civile (DGAC) Emergency AD No. CN UF-2007-015--EADS SOCATA--TBM 700,
dated September 20, 2007; EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin Number SB 70-151, Amendment 1, dated September 2007, for
related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin Number SB 70-151, Amendment 1, dated September 2007, and
Messier-Dowty Technical Instruction No. CS/ 1020/07, Issue 1, dated
September 11, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD, unless
the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact EADS
SOCATA, Direction des Services, 65921 Tarbes Cedex 9, France.
    (3) You may review copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html
.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on October 30, 2007.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
 [FR Doc. E7-21782 Filed 11-7-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P