[Federal Register: July 27, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 144)]
[Notices]
[Page 42698-42700]
[DOCID:fr27jy06-92]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54186; File No. SR-NASD-2006-081]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Adopt New
NASD Rule 5150 Relating to Trade-Throughs

July 20, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 11, 2006, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(``NASD'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the NASD. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The NASD is proposing to adopt, in anticipation of The NASDAQ Stock
Market LLC (the ``Nasdaq Exchange'') beginning to trade non-Nasdaq
exchange-listed securities on an unlisted trading privileges (``UTP'')
basis, new NASD Rule 5150 to require an NASD member that is registered
as a market maker with the Nasdaq Exchange in a non-Nasdaq exchange-
listed security to comply with the provisions of NASD Rule 5262
relating to trade-throughs with respect to that security for trades
reported to the NASD. Below is the text of the proposed rule change.
Proposed new language is in italics.
* * * * *

5000. Other Nasdaq and NASD Markets

* * * * *

5150. Applicability of Trade-Through Rule to Nasdaq Market Makers

    An NASD member shall comply with the provisions of Rule 5262
(Trade-Throughs), as if it were an ITS/CAES market maker, for purposes
of transactions that are reported to NASD in any ITS Security, as that
term is defined in Rule 5210(c), in which such member is registered as
a market maker with The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC. For purposes of this
Rule 5150, the term ``Block Transaction'' under Rule 5262(a)(7)(B)
shall mean any trade that involves 10,000 or more shares of an ITS
security or a quantity of any such security having a market value of
$200,000 or more.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the NASD included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections
A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The proposed rule change is filed in anticipation of the Nasdaq
Exchange operating as a national securities exchange for purposes of
trading non-Nasdaq exchange-listed securities on a UTP basis. The NASD
is proposing a new rule to require an NASD member that is registered as
a market maker with the Nasdaq Exchange in an ITS Security, as defined
Rule 5210(c), to comply with the provisions of NASD Rule 5262 (Trade-
Throughs) with respect to that security for trades reported to the
NASD.

Background

    On July 11, 2005, the NASD filed with the Commission proposed rule
change SR-NASD-2005-087, which, among other things, proposed amendments
to the Plan of Allocation and Delegation of Functions by the NASD to
Subsidiaries, NASD By-Laws and NASD rules to reflect The Nasdaq Stock
Market, Inc.'s (``Nasdaq'') separation from the NASD upon the Nasdaq
Exchange's operation as a national securities exchange.\3\ On June 15,
2006, the NASD filed Amendment No. 1 to SR-NASD-2005-087, which, among
other things, proposed the NASD's and Nasdaq's implementation strategy
for Nasdaq's operation as a national securities exchange. On June 30,
2006, the Commission approved SR-NASD-2005-087, as amended, the
effective date of which will be the date upon which the Nasdaq Exchange
operates as an exchange for Nasdaq-listed securities.\4\ The NASD
intends to file a second proposed rule change proposing an NASD
facility for over-the-counter quoting and trading of non-Nasdaq
exchange-listed securities, to be made available when the Nasdaq
Exchange begins to trade such securities on a UTP basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Commission approved the Nasdaq Exchange application on
January 13, 2006. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53128
(January 13, 2006), 71 FR 3550 (January 23, 2006).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54084 (June 30,
2006), 71 FR 38935 (July 10, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, NASD Rule 5262, also known as the Trade-Through Rule,
restricts a member registered as an NASD ITS/CAES Market Maker \5\ in
an ITS/CAES security \6\ from purchasing or selling such security,
whether as principal or agent, at a price that is lower than the bid or
higher than the offer displayed from an ITS Participant Exchange or
ITS/CAES Market Maker. Current NASD Rule 5262 applies to all over-the-
counter trading by NASD ITS/CAES Market Makers in that security,
including trades executed outside of CAES and reported to the NASD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For purposes of NASD Rule 5262, ``ITS/CAES Market Maker'' is
defined in NASD Rule 5210(e) as a member that is registered as a
market maker for the purposes of participating in the Intermarket
Trading System (``ITS'') through the Computer Assisted Execution
System (``CAES'') with respect to one or more specified ITS
securities in which the member is then actively registered. The term
also includes members that meet the definition of electronic
communications network or alternative trading network. CAES is an
automated system that is currently operated by The Nasdaq Stock
Market, Inc. NASD members can direct agency and principal orders in
exchange-listed securities to CAES for automated execution in the
third market.
    \6\ The term ``ITS Security'' is defined in NASD Rule 5210(c) as
``any security which may be traded through the [ITS] System by an
ITS/CAES Market Maker.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Nasdaq Exchange established a substantially similar rule,
Nasdaq Rule 5262, which, by its terms, would apply to market makers
registered with the Nasdaq Exchange (``Nasdaq market

makers'') in ITS Securities. However, because the ITS Plan does not
require the Nasdaq Exchange, or any other exchange, to have a trade-
through rule applicable to its individual market participants, the
Nasdaq Exchange has proposed to delete the rule upon integration of the
Nasdaq Market Center and Nasdaq's Brut and INET systems into a single
book.\7\ If approved, the Nasdaq Exchange's rule would be replaced with
a trade-through obligation imposed on the Nasdaq Exchange itself.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53583 (March 31,
2006), 71 FR 19573 (April 14, 2006) (SR-NASDAQ-2006-001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, once the Nasdaq Exchange is operating as an exchange for
non-Nasdaq exchange-listed securities, it is expected that some of the
current NASD ITS/CAES Market Makers will no longer be registered with
the NASD in this capacity, but instead will become registered solely as
Nasdaq Market Makers. As such, no trade-through rule would apply to
over-the-counter trading activity by these Nasdaq market makers that
are not also registered as NASD ITS/CAES market makers. Specifically,
NASD Rule 5262 only applies to trading by NASD ITS/CAES market makers.
Nasdaq Rule 5262 would be similarly limited in its application to
Nasdaq market makers trading on or through the Nasdaq Exchange, and is
expected to be eliminated altogether upon approval of the Nasdaq
Exchange's system integration.

Proposed New NASD Rule 5150

    The NASD is proposing new NASD Rule 5150 \8\ that would subject an
NASD member registered as a market maker with the Nasdaq Exchange in an
ITS Security to the provisions of NASD Rule 5262 for purposes of trades
in that ITS Security reported to the NASD, as if such market maker were
an ITS/CAES Market Maker. Thus, an NASD member that is a Nasdaq market
maker trading ITS Securities otherwise than on an exchange--for
example, through the Trade Reporting Facility approved as part of SR-
NASD-2005-087--would be subject to the provisions of NASD Rule 5262,
including its trade-through complaint procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Pursuant to SR-NASD-2005-087, the NASD Rule 5000 Series will
be renamed ``Trading Otherwise Than On An Exchange'' and for
purposes of the NASD Rule 5000 Series, ``otherwise than on an
exchange'' will mean a trade effected by an NASD member otherwise
than on or through a national securities exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All of the exclusions to the Trade-Through Rule applicable under
NASD Rule 5262(a) would be available to Nasdaq market makers subject to
proposed NASD Rule 5150 and would apply as they do today to ITS/CAES
Market Makers, with one limited exception. The NASD is proposing that,
for purposes of applying the term ``Block Transaction'' under NASD Rule
5262(a)(7)(B) to Nasdaq market makers that are not NASD ITS/CAES Market
Makers, the term mean any trade that involves 10,000 or more shares of
an ITS security or a quantity of any such security having a market
value of $200,000 or more. This limitation makes the term consistent
with the definition of ``block size'' in Regulation NMS Rule 600, which
currently serves to exempt certain NASD members from a requirement to
become NASD ITS/CAES Market Makers under certain circumstances. As
such, Nasdaq market makers that are not also NASD ITS/CAES Market
Makers would not be subject to the requirement in Rule 5264(a) to send
commitments to other venues when executing block size trades or the
other block transaction requirements in NASD Rule 5264(b)(2) and (3),
such as the requirement to effect a block trade as a cross or at a
price other than the ITS/CAES Market Maker's quote.
    The NASD believes proposed NASD Rule 5150 is necessary to maintain
the application of the Trade-Through Rule until implementation of
Regulation NMS, and specifically the Order Protection Rule mandating
intermarket protection against trade-throughs for all Nasdaq and
exchange-listed securities.\9\ Effective upon the implementation of the
Order Protection Rule, the NASD would repeal NASD Rule 5150 in favor of
a more general rule complying with Regulation NMS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496 (June 29, 2005) (Final Rule). The effective date
for NMS Rule 611, the Order Protection Rule, was August 29, 2005;
however, the initial compliance date has been extended from June 29,
2006 to a series of five dates, beginning on October 16, 2006. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53829 (May 18, 2006), 71 FR
30038 (May 24, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The effective date of the proposed rule change will be the date
upon which the Nasdaq Exchange begins to trade non-Nasdaq exchange-
listed securities on a UTP basis.
2. Statutory Basis
    The NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\10\ which requires,
among other things, that NASD rules be designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The NASD believes that the proposed rule change will
enhance investor protection by maintaining trade through protection for
over-the-counter trades in exchange-listed securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NASD-2006-081 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2006-081. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will

post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent

amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public
Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the NASD. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2006-081 and should be
submitted on or before August 17, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-11984 Filed 7-26-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TO:	Bill Schrock, U.S. EPA/OAQPS/SPPD  -  Natural Resources Group

FROM:	Eastern Research Group, Inc.

DATE:	September 27, 2018

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT:	Costs for the Leather Finishing Operations Source Category Risk and Technology Review  -  Final Amendments
INTRODUCTION
      This memorandum describes the methodologies for estimating costs to comply with the amendments to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Leather Finishing Operations (40 CFR part 63, subpart TTTT) Risk and Technology Review. The EPA is revising the monitoring, recordkeeping, or reporting requirements for subpart TTTT, which will impose additional costs on leather finishing operations. We estimate that there will be costs for the four existing facilities associated with review of the promulgated standards, as discussed in section 2.0. The rule amendments include additional recordkeeping and reporting requirements for any leather operation that elects to comply with the standard using an emission control device; however, none of the four existing leather operations currently use an emission control device to comply with subpart TTTT, and we are not aware of any planned or potential new or reconstructed leather finishing operations. As a result, "0" leather finishing operations will comply with these new requirements, which will result in no added cost to the industry. Further, the rule amendments include revised recordkeeping and reporting requirements for any leather finishing operation that deviates from the standards; however, these revised records and reports add no additional burden because the EPA anticipates that no facilities will deviate from the standards during the three years of this information collection.

TOTAL COSTS
      The total national costs to comply with the rule are $832 (see "Leather Finishing RTR Cost Memo Workbook - Final Amendments," available in Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0194). We estimate that, in the first year following promulgation of these final amendments, each of the four existing affected facilities will spend 2 technical labor hours, 0.2 clerical labor hours, and 0.1 managerial labor hours to review the revised rule. United States Department of Labor rates of $45.29, $18.03, and $48.98 (labor rates are in 2017 dollars) were used for the technical, clerical, and managerial labor categories, respectively. For the purposes of this cost analysis, these rates were increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.
REFERENCES
 United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, table titled "May 2017 National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates NAICS 316100 - Leather and Hide Tanning and Finishing," available at: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_316100.htm.
 Eastern Research Group, Leather Finishing RTR Cost Memo Workbook  -  Final Amendments, September 2018.


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6274-6275]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02009]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0001; FRL-9376-3]

Withdrawal of Pesticide Petitions for Residues of Pesticide
Chemicals in or on Various Commodities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of withdrawal of pesticide petitions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the withdrawal of pesticide petitions
requesting the establishment or modification of regulations for
residues of pesticide chemicals in or on various commodities. The
petitions were either withdrawn voluntarily by the petitioners or
administratively by the Agency.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A contact person, with telephone
number and email address, is listed at the end of each pesticide
petition summary. You may also reach each contact person by mail at
Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    Although this action only applies to the petitioners in question,
it is directed to the public in general. Since various individuals or
entities may be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe
all the specific entities that may be interested in this action. If you
have any questions regarding this action, please consult the person
listed at the end of the withdrawal summary for the pesticide petition
of interest.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The docket for this action, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0001, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the OPP Docket in the Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), located in EPA West, Rm.
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. What action is the agency taking?

    EPA is announcing the withdrawal of pesticide petitions received
under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
21 U.S.C. 346a, requesting the establishment or modification of
regulations in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of pesticide chemicals in
or on various food commodities.
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a summary of each of the petitions
covered by this document, prepared by the petitioner, was included in a
docket EPA created for each rulemaking. The docket for each of the
petitions is available online at http://www.regulations.gov.

Withdrawals by Petitioners

    1. PP 0E7754 (Gentamicin). EPA issued a notice in the Federal
Register of July 6, 2011 (76 FR 39358) (FRL-8875-6) (EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-
0820), which announced the filing of a pesticide petition (PP 0E7754)
by Quimica Agronomica de Mexico, S. de R.L. MI., Calle 18 N[deg] 20501,
Colonia Impulso, C.P. 31183, Chihuahua, Chih., Mexico c/o Gowan
Company, P.O. Box 5569, Yuma, AZ 85366. The petition proposed to
establish a tolerance in 40 CFR 180.642 for residues of the fungicide
gentamicin, in or on cucurbits (crop group 9) at 0.05 parts per million
(ppm) and fruiting vegetables (crop group 8) at 0.05 ppm. On June 18,
2012, Gowan Company (U.S. agent on behalf of Quimica Agronomica de
Mexico) notified EPA that it was withdrawing this petition. Contact:
Shaunta Hill,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    2. PP 0E7755 (Oxytetracycline). EPA issued a notice in the Federal
Register of September 23, 2010 (75 FR 57942) (FRL-8845-4) (EPA-HQ-OPP-
2010-0740), which announced the filing of pesticide petition (PP
0E7755) by Quimica Agronomica de Mexico, S. de R.L. MI., Calle 18 N
20501, Colonia Impulso, C.P. 31183, Chihuahua, Chih., Mexico. The
petition proposed to establish a tolerance in 40 CFR 180.337 for
residues of the fungicide oxytetracycline, in or on cucurbits, crop
group 9; and fruiting vegetables, crop group 8 at 0.03 ppm. On June 18,
2012, Gowan Company (U.S. agent on behalf of Quimica Agronomica de
Mexico) notified EPA that it was withdrawing this petition. Contact:
Heather Garvie,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. PP 1F7887 (Phosphine). EPA issued a notice in the Federal
Register of October 5, 2011 (76 FR 61649) (FRL-8890-5) (EPA-HQ-OPP-
2011-0741), which announced the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
1F7887) by Cytec Industries, Inc., 5 Garret Mountain Plaza, Woodland
Park, NJ 07424. The petition proposed to establish tolerances in 40 CFR
180.225 for residues of phosphine, in or on asparagus; cherimoya;
dates, fresh; figs, fresh; globe artichokes; pawpaws; pineapple, water
chestnuts and watercress, and for all fresh fruit and vegetable crop
groups (including berry and small fruit; citrus fruit; pome fruit;
stone fruit; herbs and spices; Brassica leafy vegetables; leafy
vegetables; bulb vegetables; cucurbits; fruiting vegetables except
cucurbits; legume vegetables, except soybeans; foliage of legume
vegetables; root and tuber group; and root and tuber leaves group) at
0.01 ppm. On April 5, 2012, Cytec Industries notified EPA that it was
withdrawing the petition. Contact: Gene Benbow,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    4. PP 4F4281 (Iprodione). EPA issued a notice in the Federal
Register of August 2, 2006 (71 FR 43760) (FRL-8082-8) (EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-
0637), which announced the filing of pesticide petition (PP 4F4281) by
Bayer CropScience, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709. The
petition proposed to establish a tolerance for iprodione, [3-(3,5-
dichlorophenyl)-N-(1-methylethyl)-2,4- dioxo-1-
imidazolidinecarboxamide, its isomer 3-(1-methylethyl)-N-(3,5-
dichlorophenyl)-2,4-dioxo-1-imidazolidinecarboxamide, and its
metabolite 3-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-2,4-dioxo-1-imidazolidinecarboxamide
in or on the food commodity rapeseed (canola) at 1.0 ppm. On March 7,
2012, Bayer Crop Science, notified EPA that it was

withdrawing its petition. Contact: Tamue L. Gibson,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    5. PP 9F7565 (Iprodione). EPA issued a notice in the Federal
Register of September 4, 2009 (74 FR 45848) (FRL-8434-4) (EPA-HQ-OPP-
2009-0550), which announced the filing of pesticide petition (PP
9F7565) by Devgen US, Inc., 413 McFarlan Road, Suite B, Kennett Square,
PA 19348, which proposed to establish a tolerance in 40 CFR 180.399 for
residues of iprodione, in or on cucurbit crop group at 0.3 ppm; and
fruiting vegetables, except cucurbits at 2.0 ppm. On June 22, 2012,
Devgen US, Inc., notified EPA that it was withdrawing its petition.
Contact: Tamue L. Gibson,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    6. PP 2E7993 (Ethephon). EPA issued a notice in the Federal
Register of May 23, 2012 (77 FR 30481) (FRL-9347-8) (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-
0241), which announced the filing of pesticide petition (PP 2E7993) by
Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4), 500 College Road East,
Suite 201 W, Princeton, NJ 08540. The petition proposed to increase a
tolerance in 40 CFR 180.300 for residues of the plant regulator
ethephon in or on tomato from 2.0 ppm to 3.5 ppm. On January 3, 2013,
IR-4 notified EPA that it was withdrawing this petition. Contact:
Andrew Ertman,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives,
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: January 23, 2013.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2013-02009 Filed 1-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: September 27, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 187)]
[Notices]
[Page 56527-56528]
[DOCID:fr27se06-89]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-ORD-2006-0798; FRL-8223-8]

Human Studies Review Board; Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA or Agency)
Office of the Science Advisor (OSA) announces a public meeting of the
Human Studies Review Board (HSRB) to advise the Agency on EPA's
scientific and ethical reviews of human subjects research.

DATES: The public meeting will be held October 18-19, 2006, from 8:30
a.m. to approximately 5 p.m., eastern time on October 18, 2006, and
8:30 to approximately 2 eastern time on October 19, 2006.
    Location: One Potomac Yard, 2777 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA
22202.
    Meeting Access: Seating at the meeting will be on a first-come
basis. Individuals requiring special accommodations at this meeting,
including wheelchair access and assistance for the hearing impaired,
should contact the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) at least 10
business days prior to the meeting using the information under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT so that appropriate arrangements can be
made.
    Procedures For Providing Public Input: Interested members of the
public may submit relevant written or oral comments for the HSRB to
consider during the advisory process. Additional information concerning
submission of relevant written or oral comments is provided in Unit
I.D. of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any member of the public who wishes
further information should contact Maria Szilagyi, Designated Federal
Officer (DFO), EPA, Office of the Science Advisor, (8105R),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (202) 564
2070; e-mail addresses<EMAIL_ADDRESS>General information
concerning the EPA HSRB can be found on the EPA Web site at http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/
.

ADDRESSES: Submit your written comments, identified by Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-ORD-2006-0798, by one of the following methods:
    Internet: http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line

instructions for submitting comments.
    E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Mail: ORD Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode:
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Public Reading Room,
Infoterra Room (Room Number 3334), EPA West Building, 1301 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-ORD-
2006-0798. Deliveries are only accepted from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. Special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-ORD-
2006-0798. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site

is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA, without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be

automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Public Meeting

A. Does This Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. This action may,
however, be of interest to persons who conduct or assess human studies
on substances regulated by EPA or to persons who are or may be required
to conduct testing of chemical substances under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) or the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Since other entities may also be interested,
the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that
may be affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of This Document and Other
Related Information?

    In addition to using regulations.gov, you may access this Federal
Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the
Federal Register listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://.

http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some

information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the ORD Docket, EPA/

DC, Public Reading Room, Infoterra Room (Room Number 3334), 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the ORD Docket is (202) 566-
1752. EPA's position paper(s), charge/questions to the HSRB, and the
meeting agenda are now available. In addition, the Agency may provide
additional background documents as the materials become available. You
may obtain electronic copies of these documents, and certain other
related documents that might be available electronically, from the
regulations.gov Web site and the HSRB Internet Home Page at http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/.
 For questions on document availability or if you

do not have access to the Internet, consult the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

C. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
    a. Explain your views as clearly as possible.
    b. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    c. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
    d. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.
    e. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.

D. How May I Participate in This Meeting?

    You may participate in this meeting by following the instructions
in this section. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, it is imperative that
you identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-ORD-2006-0798 in the subject line
on the first page of your request.
    a. Oral comments. Requests to present oral comments will be
accepted up to October 10, 2006. To the extent that time permits,
interested persons who have not pre-registered may be permitted by the
Chair of the HSRB to present oral comments at the meeting. Each
individual or group wishing to make brief oral comments to the HSRB is
strongly advised to submit their request (preferably via e-mail) to the
DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT no later than noon,
eastern time, October 10, 2006, in order to be included on the meeting
agenda and to provide sufficient time for the HSRB Chair and HSRB DFO
to review the agenda to provide an appropriate public comment period.
The request should identify the name of the individual making the
presentation, the organization (if any) the individual will represent,
and any requirements for audiovisual equipment (e.g., overhead
projector, LCD projector, chalkboard). Oral comments before the HSRB
are limited to 5 minutes per individual or organization. Please note
that this limit applies to the cumulative time used by all individuals
appearing either as part of, or on behalf of an organization. While it
is our intent to hear a full range of oral comments on the science and
ethics issues under discussion, it is not our intent to permit
organizations to expand these time limitations by having numerous
individuals sign up separately to speak on their behalf. If additional
time is available, there may be flexibility in time for public
comments. Each speaker should bring 25 copies of his or her comments
and presentation slides for distribution to the HSRB at the meeting.
    b. Written comments. Although you may submit written comments at
any time, for the HSRB to have the best opportunity to review and
consider your comments as it deliberates on its report, you should
submit your comments at least 5 business days prior to the beginning of
the meeting. If you submit comments after this date, those comments
will be provided to the Board members, but you should recognize that
the Board members may not have adequate time to consider those comments
prior to making a decision. Thus, if you plan to submit written
comments, the Agency strongly encourages you to submit such comments no
later than noon, eastern time, October 10, 2006. You should submit your
comments using the instructions in Unit I.C. of this notice. In
addition, the Agency also requests that person(s) submitting comments
directly to the docket also provide a copy of their comments to the DFO
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. There is no limit on the
length of written comments for consideration by the HSRB.

E. Background

    EPA will be presenting for HSRB review the results of a completed
human toxicity study, evaluating the allergic contact dermatitis
response in individuals with known sensitivity to hexavalent chromium
to repeated exposure to a wood treatment solution containing hexavalent
chromium. In addition, the Board will be asked to review two revised
research protocols to evaluate the efficacy of new formulations of the
repellent, IR3535, against ticks and mosquitoes and to advise on a
draft guidance document explaining to the public how to submit proposed
and completed human research to EPA for review by the HSRB. Finally, at
the Board's request, EPA will present the statutory and regulatory
procedures that EPA and its federal advisory committees are required to
follow when handling materials claimed to be confidential business
information (CBI) under FIFRA or other laws. The HSRB intends to
discuss how it would like to operate in the event that EPA requests the
Board to review materials containing CBI.

    Dated: September 22, 2006.
George Gray,
Science Advisor.
 [FR Doc. E6-15832 Filed 9-26-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: October 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 192)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 61363-61365]
[DOCID:fr05oc10-15]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0993; Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-08-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce plc RB211-524 Series, -535
Series, RB211 Trent 700 Series, and RB211 Trent 800 Series Turbofan
Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    Cracking has been found on the inner wall between intermediate
dilution chutes on a total of five front combustion liners of the
standard corresponding to Rolls-Royce RB211 Service Bulletin No. 72-
D133. The lives of two of these liners were confirmed to be below
the currently valid borescope inspection interval. Ultimately, crack
propagation could result in hot gas breakout with potential of
downstream component distress and multiple turbine blade release
beyond containment capabilities of the engine casings. Thus,
cracking of this nature constitutes a potentially unsafe condition.
    Since Rolls-Royce Service Bulletin No. 72-E902 introduces
further developments of Rolls-Royce RB211 Service Bulletin No. 72-
D133, engines incorporating Rolls-Royce RB211 Service Bulletin No.
72-E902 are also considered to be potentially affected and are
therefore included in the applicability of this AD.

We are proposing this AD to detect cracks in the front combustion
liner, which could result in hot section distress, uncontained multiple
blade release and possible damage to the aircraft.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 19,
2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Contact Rolls-Royce plc, P.O. Box 31, Derby, DE24 8BJ, United
Kingdom; telephone: 011-44-1332-242424; fax: 011-44-1332-249936 for the
service information identified in this proposed AD.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
the same as the Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian Dargin, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0993;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-08-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including, if provided, the name of the individual who
sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.).

You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2009-0243R1, dated November 26, 2009 (referred
to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    Cracking has been found on the inner wall between intermediate
dilution chutes on a total of five front combustion liners of the
standard corresponding to Rolls-Royce RB211 Service Bulletin No. 72-
D133. The lives of two of these liners were confirmed to be below
the currently valid borescope inspection interval. Ultimately, crack
propagation could result in hot gas breakout with potential of
downstream component distress and multiple turbine blade release
beyond containment capabilities of the engine casings. Thus,
cracking of this nature constitutes a potentially unsafe condition.
    Since Rolls-Royce Service Bulletin No. 72-E902 introduces
further developments of Rolls-Royce RB211 Service Bulletin No. 72-
D133, engines incorporating Rolls-Royce RB211 Service Bulletin No.
72-E902 are also considered to be potentially affected and are
therefore included in the applicability of this AD.
    This AD requires a change to the initial and repeat borescope
inspection intervals for the front combustion liner.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Rolls-Royce plc has issued Alert Service Bulletin RB.211-72-AF458,
Revision 4, dated March 9, 2009. The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of the
United Kingdom, and is approved for operation in the United States.
Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the United Kingdom, they have
notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of
the same type design.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 239 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1.5 work-hours per product to comply with this
proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. No parts are
required so parts would cost about $0 per product. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $30,473.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Rolls-Royce plc: Docket No. FAA-2010-0993; Directorate Identifier
2010-NE-08-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by November 19, 2010.

Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Rolls-Royce (RR) engine models RB211-
524G2-T-19, RB211-524G3-T-19, RB211-524H2-T-19, RB211-524H-T-36,
RB211-535E4-37, RB211-535E4-B-37, RB211-535E4-C-37, RB211-535E4-B-
75, RB211 Trent 768-60, RB211 Trent 772-60, RB211 Trent 772B-60,
RB211-Trent 892-17, RB211-Trent 884-17, RB211-Trent 884B-17, RB211-
Trent 877-17, RB211-Trent 875-17, RB211-Trent 892-17, RB211-Trent
892B-17 and RB211-Trent 895-17 engines, that incorporate RR Service
Bulletins (SBs) RB.211-72-D133 or RB.211-72-E902. These engines are
installed on, but not limited to Airbus A330 series airplanes;
Boeing 747-400 series, 757 series, 767 series, and 777 series
airplanes; and Tupolev Tu204 series airplanes.

Reason

    (d) This AD results from:

    Cracking has been found on the inner wall between intermediate
dilution chutes on a total of five front combustion liners of the
standard corresponding to Rolls-Royce RB211 Service Bulletin No. 72-
D133. The lives of two of these liners were confirmed to be below
the currently valid borescope inspection interval. Ultimately, crack
propagation could result in hot gas breakout with potential of
downstream component distress and multiple turbine blade release
beyond containment capabilities of the engine casings. Thus,
cracking of this nature constitutes a potentially unsafe condition.
    Since Rolls-Royce Service Bulletin No. 72-E902 introduces
further developments of Rolls-Royce RB211 Service Bulletin No. 72-
D133, engines incorporating Rolls-Royce RB211 Service Bulletin No.
72-E902 are also considered to be potentially affected and are

therefore included in the applicability of this AD.
    We are issuing this AD to detect cracks in the front combustion
liner, which could result in hot section distress, uncontained
multiple blade release and possible damage to the aircraft.

Actions and Compliance

    (e) Unless already done, do the following actions.

Inspection

    (f) Perform a borescope inspection as specified in section 3.
Accomplishment instructions, subsection A. Borescope Inspection of
Rolls-Royce RB211 Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) RB.211-72-AF458
Revision 4, dated March 9, 2009, before the limits specified below:

Initial Inspection

    (1) If the engine has a combustion liner installed with:
    (i) A LIFE on the effective date of this AD, that is equal to or
greater than the initial inspection threshold specified in column
(b) in Table 1 of this AD, or
    (ii) A LIFE on the effective date of this AD, that is not known,
carry out the action specified in paragraph (f) of this AD within
250 cycles after the effective date of this AD.
    (iii) A LIFE on the effective date of this AD, that is less than
the initial inspection threshold specified in column (b) of Table 1
of this AD, perform the borescope inspection before the LIFE exceeds
the limit specified in column (c) of Table 1 of this AD.

Repeat Inspection

    (2) Thereafter, repeat the borescope inspection at intervals not
to exceed the cycles specified in column (d) of Table 1 or this AD.

                                                    Table 1--Initial Inspection Thresholds and Limits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Column (a)                            Column (b)                              Column (c)                             Column (d)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             Initial inspection limit if LIFE is
           Engine Model                  Initial inspection threshold          less than the initial inspection          Repeat inspection interval
                                                                                threshold
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) RB211-524G2-T-19, 524G3-T-19    1,150 cycles..........................  1,400 cycles.........................  1,400 cycles.
 and 524H2-T-19.
(ii) RB211-524H-T-36..............  550 cycles............................  800 cycles...........................  800 cycles.
(iii) RB211-535E4-37, E4-B-37 and   550 cycles............................  800 cycles...........................  800 cycles.
 E4-C-37.
(iv) RB211-535E4-B-75.............  550 cycles............................  800 cycles...........................  800 cycles.
(v) RB211-Trent 768-60, 772-60 and  1,250 cycles..........................  1,500 cycles.........................  1,500 cycles.
 772B-60.
(vi) RB211-Trent 892-17, RB211-     750 cycles............................  1,000 cycles.........................  1,000 cycles.
 Trent 884-17, RB211-Trent 884B-
 17, RB211-Trent 877-17, RB211-
 Trent 875-17, RB211-Trent 892B-17
 and RB211-Trent 895-17 engines.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Definitions

    (g) This AD defines LIFE as the lowest of:
    (1) The number of cycles-since-new of the combustion liner, or
    (2) The number of cycles-in-service (CIS) since replacement of
the inner wall, or
    (3) The number of CIS since the combustion liner was last
inspected in accordance with section 3. Accomplishment instructions,
subsection A. Borescope Inspection of Rolls-Royce RB211 Series
Propulsion System Series Non-Modification Service Bulletin No.
RB.211-72-AF458 Revision 2, dated December 21, 2007.

FAA AD Differences

    (h) This AD differs from the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information (MCAI) and or service information in that the MCAI AD
applies to the RB211 Trent 772C-60 engine, which isn't type
certificated in the United States.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19.

Related Information

    (j) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2009-0243R1, dated November 26, 2009, and Rolls-Royce ASB
RB.211-72-AF458, Revision 4, dated March 9, 2009, for related
information. Contact Rolls-Royce plc, P.O. Box 31, Derby, DE24 8BJ,
United Kingdom; telephone: 011-44-1332-242424; fax: 011-44-1332-
249936, for a copy of this service information.
    (k) Contact Ian Dargin, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, for more information
about this AD.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 27, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-24888 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P