[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 236 (Monday, December 9, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67265-67266]
[FR Doc No: 2019-26466]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-10002-98-OAR]

Allocations of Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Allowances From New
Unit Set-Asides for 2019 Control Periods

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of data availability (NODA).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is providing notice
of the availability of preliminary lists of units eligible for second-
round allocations of emission allowances for the 2019 control periods
from the new unit set-asides (NUSAs) established under the Cross-State
Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) trading programs. EPA has posted
spreadsheets containing the lists on EPA's website. EPA will consider
timely objections to the lists before determining the amounts of the
second-round allocations.

DATES: Objections to the information referenced in this notice must be
received on or before January 8, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your objections via email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Include ``2019 NUSA allocations'' in the email subject line and include
your name, title, affiliation, address, phone number, and email address
in the body of the email.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning this action
should be addressed to Jason Kuhns at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Andrew Reighart at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under each CSAPR trading program where EPA
is responsible for determining emission allowance allocations, a
portion of each state's emissions budget for the program for each
control period is reserved in a NUSA (and in an additional Indian
country NUSA in the case of states with Indian country within their
borders) for allocation to certain units that would not otherwise
receive allowance allocations. The procedures for identifying the
eligible units for each control period and for allocating allowances
from the NUSAs and Indian country NUSAs to these units are set forth in
the CSAPR trading program regulations at 40 CFR 97.411(b) and 97.412
(NOX Annual), 97.511(b) and 97.512 (NOX Ozone
Season Group 1), 97.611(b) and 97.612 (SO2 Group 1),
97.711(b) and 97.712 (SO2 Group 2), and 97.811(b) and 97.812
(NOX Ozone Season Group 2). Each NUSA allowance allocation
process involves up to two rounds of allocations to eligible units,
termed ``new'' units, followed by the allocation to ``existing'' units
of any allowances not allocated to new units.
    This notice concerns EPA's preliminary identification of units
eligible to receive allowances in the second round of NUSA allocations
for the 2019 control periods. The units eligible for second-round
allocations for a given control period are CSAPR-affected units that
commenced commercial operation between January 1 of the year before
that control period and November 30 of the year of that control period.
In the case of the 2019 control periods, an eligible unit therefore
must have commenced commercial operation between January 1, 2018 and
November 30, 2019 (inclusive). Generally, where a unit is eligible to
receive a second-round NUSA allocation under a given CSAPR trading
program for a given control period, the unit's maximum potential
second-round allocation equals the positive difference (if any) between
the unit's emissions during the control period as reported under 40 CFR
part 75 and any first-round NUSA allocation the unit received. If the
total of such maximum potential allocations to all eligible units would
exceed the total allowances remaining in the NUSA, the allocations are
reduced on a pro-rata basis. EPA notes that under 40 CFR 97.406(c)(3),
97.506(c)(3), 97.606(c)(3), 97.706(c)(3), and 97.806(c)(3), a unit's
emissions occurring before its monitor certification deadline are not
considered to have occurred during a control period and consequently
are not included in the emission amounts used to determine NUSA
allocations.
    The preliminary lists of eligible units are set forth in Excel
spreadsheets titled
``CSAPR_NUSA_2019_NOX_Annual_2nd_Round_Prelim_Data,''
``CSAPR_NUSA_2019_NOX_Ozone_Season_2nd_Round_Prelim_Data,''
and'' ``CSAPR_NUSA_2019_SO2_2nd_Round_Prelim_Data''
available on EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/csapr/csapr-compliance-year-2019-nusa-nodas. Each spreadsheet contains a separate
worksheet for each state covered by that program showing each unit
preliminarily identified as eligible for a second-round NUSA
allocation. Each state worksheet also contains a summary showing (1)
the quantity of allowances initially available in that state's 2019
NUSA, (2) the sum of the 2019 NUSA allowance allocations that were made
in the first round to new units in that state, if any, and (3) the
quantity of allowances in the 2019 NUSA available for second-round
allocations to new units (or ultimately for allocations to existing
units), if any.
    Objections should be strictly limited to whether EPA has correctly
identified the units eligible for second-round 2019 NUSA allocations
according to the criteria established in the regulations and should be
emailed to the address identified in ADDRESSES. Objections must
include: (1) Precise identification of the specific data the commenter
believes are inaccurate, (2) new proposed data upon which the commenter
believes EPA should rely instead, and (3) the reasons why EPA should
rely on the commenter's proposed data and not the data referenced in
this notice.
    EPA notes that an allocation or lack of allocation of allowances to
a given unit does not constitute a determination that CSAPR does or
does not apply to the unit. EPA also notes that under 40 CFR 97.411(c),
97.511(c), 97.611(c), 97.711(c), and 97.811(c), allocations are subject
to potential correction if a unit to which NUSA allowances have been
allocated for a given control period is not actually an affected unit
as of the start of that control period.

(Authority: 40 CFR 97.411(b), 97.511(b), 97.611(b), 97.711(b), and
97.811(b).)

    Dated: November 30, 2019.
Reid P. Harvey,
Director, Clean Air Markets Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs,
Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2019-26466 Filed 12-6-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 109 (Thursday, June 6, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26453-26454]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11834]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-85993; File No. 013-00106]

Initial Form ATS-N Filing; Notice of Extension of Commission
Review Period

May 31, 2019.
    On February 8, 2019, Crossfinder filed an initial Form ATS-N
(``Form ATS-N'') with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''). Pursuant to Rule 304 under the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''), the Commission may, after notice and an
opportunity for hearing, declare an initial Form ATS-N ineffective no
later than 120 days from the date of filing with the Commission, or, if
applicable, the extended review period. June 8, 2019 is 120 calendar
days from the date of filing. Pursuant to Rule 304(a)(1)(iv)(B), the
Commission may extend the initial Form ATS-N review period for up to an
additional 120 calendar days if the initial Form ATS-N is unusually
lengthy or raises novel or complex issues that require additional time
for review.
    Crossfinder was operating pursuant to an initial operation report
on Form ATS on file with the Commission as of January 7, 2019.\1\
Crossfinder filed an initial Form ATS-N on February 8, 2019. During the
initial 120 calendar day review period, the Commission staff has been
reviewing the disclosures on Crossfinder's initial Form ATS-N. In
addition, the staff has been engaged in ongoing discussions with
Crossfinder about its disclosures and manner of operations, as well as
the requirements of Form ATS-N, to facilitate complete and
comprehensible disclosures that reflect the complexities of those
operations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ An NMS Stock ATS (as defined in Rule 300(k) of Regulation
ATS) that was operating pursuant to an initial operation report on
Form ATS on file with the Commission as of January 7, 2019 is a
``Legacy NMS Stock ATS.'' 17 CFR 242.301(b)(2)(viii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form ATS-N requires NMS Stock ATSs to file with the Commission, and
disclose to the public for the first time, certain information,
including descriptions by the NMS Stock ATSs of their fees, the trading
activities by their broker-dealer operators and their affiliates in the
NMS Stock ATSs, their use of market data, their written standards for
granting access to trading on the NMS Stock ATSs, and their written
safeguards and procedures for protecting their subscribers'
confidential trading information required by revised Rule 301(b)(10) of
Regulation ATS. The initial Form ATS-N disclosures and discussions with
Commission staff have revealed complexities about the operations of
Legacy NMS Stock ATSs including, among other things, matching
functionalities, means of order entry, order interaction and execution
procedures, conditional order processes, segmentation of orders, and
counterparty selection protocols. The Commission staff needs additional
time to review novel and complex issues such as these, which Commission
staff has discussed with Crossfinder. Extending the initial Form ATS-N
Commission review period for an additional 120 calendar days will
provide Commission staff an opportunity to continue its review of the

initial Form ATS-N disclosures and discussions with Crossfinder.
    In the conversations between Crossfinder and Commission staff about
the initial Form ATS-N disclosures and the ATS operations, Commission
staff and Crossfinder have discussed a potential amendment to update
Crossfinder's disclosures regarding the complexities of its operations.
Extending the review period will enable the NMS Stock ATS to amend its
disclosures, if appropriate, and allow Commission staff to conduct a
thorough review of amendments to the initial disclosures provided on
the initial Form ATS-N.
    For the reasons given above, the Commission is extending the review
period of the initial Form ATS-N submitted by Crossfinder. Accordingly,
pursuant to Rule 304(a)(1)(iv)(B), October 6, 2019 is the date by which
the Commission may declare the initial Form ATS-N submitted by
Crossfinder ineffective.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-11834 Filed 6-5-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13525-13528]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5549]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2012-0114]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Rocketts Red Glare Fireworks, Ancarrows Landing
Park, James River, Richmond, VA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters of James River in Richmond, VA in support of the Labor
Day Fireworks event. This action is necessary to provide for the safety
of life on navigable waters during the Rocketts Red Glare Fireworks
show. This action is intended to restrict vessel traffic movement to
protect mariners and spectators from the hazards associated with aerial
fireworks display.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 6, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-0114 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Christopher O'Neal, Waterways Management Division
Chief, Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2012-0114), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via http://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received
by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you
fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2012-0114'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an

unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2012-0114'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
    For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the public meeting,
contact LCDR Christopher O'Neal at the telephone number or email
address indicated under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this notice.

Basis and Purpose

    On May 27, 2012, the City of Richmond will sponsor a fireworks
display on the shoreline of the navigable waters of the James River.
The fireworks will be launched from a shore-based platform centered on
position 37[deg]31'13.1'' N/077[deg]25'07.84'' W (NAD 1983). Due to the
need to protect mariners and spectators from the hazards associated
with the fireworks display, such as the accidental discharge of
fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers or other
debris, vessel traffic will be temporarily restricted on all navigable
waters within 420 feet of the fireworks launch site.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Captain of the Port Hampton Roads proposes establishing a
safety zone on specified waters of the James River within the area
bounded by a 420-foot radius circle centered on position
37[deg]31'13.1'' N/077[deg]25'07.84'' W (NAD 1983). This safety zone
will be established in the vicinity of Richmond, VA from 9 p.m. to 10
p.m. on May 27, 2012. In the interest of public safety, general
navigation within the safety zone will be restricted during the
specified date and times. Except for participants and vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his
representative, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the
regulated area.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full regulatory evaluation is unnecessary. Although this
proposed regulation restricts access to the safety zone, the effect of
this rule will not be significant because: (i) The safety zone will be
in effect for a limited duration; (ii) the zone is of limited size; and
(iii) the Coast Guard will make notifications via maritime advisories
so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the zone will only be in place for a
limited duration, it is limited in size, and maritime advisories will
be issued allowing the mariners to adjust their plans accordingly.
    This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: the owners and operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in that portion of the James River from
9 p.m. to 10 p.m. on May 27, 2012.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact LCDR Christopher O'Neal,
Waterways Management Division Chief, Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast
Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination will be
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed
rule involves establishing a safety zone around a fireworks display.
The fireworks are launched from land and the safety zone is intended to
keep mariners away from any debris that may enter the water. We seek
any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

    1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
    2. Add Sec.  165.T05-0114 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T05-0114  Safety Zone; Rocketts Red Glare Fireworks,
Ancarrows Landing Park, James River, Richmond, VA.

    (a) Regulated Area. The following area is a safety zone: All waters
of the James River in the vicinity of Richmond, VA within 420 feet of
position 337[deg]31'13.1'' N/077[deg]25'07.84'' W (NAD 1983).
    (b) Definition: For the purposes of this part, Captain of the Port
Representative means any U.S. Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Hampton Roads, Virginia to act on his behalf.
    (c) Regulations: (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or his designated
representatives.
    (2) The operator of any vessel in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
    (i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer on shore or on board a vessel
that is displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
    (ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on shore or on board a vessel that is displaying a U.S. Coast
Guard Ensign.
    (3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads can be reached through
the Sector Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads in Portsmouth, Virginia
at telephone Number<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) The Coast Guard Representatives enforcing the safety zone can
be contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).

    (d) Enforcement Period: This regulation will be enforced from 9
p.m. until 10 p.m. on May 27, 2012.

    Dated: February 22, 2012.
Mark S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2012-5549 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: May 18, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 96)]
[Notices]
[Page 28858-28859]
[DOCID:fr18my06-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM06-16-000]

Mandatory Reliability Standards for the Bulk-Power System; Notice
of Comment Period

May 11, 2006.
    On April 4, 2006, the North American Electric Reliability Council,
on behalf of its wholly-owned subsidiary, the North American Electric
Reliability Corporation (NERC), filed 102 proposed Reliability
Standards for Commission approval, subject to its application for
certification as the Electric Reliability Organization (ERO) pursuant
to section 215 of the Federal Power Act (FPA).
    Concurrent with this notice, the Commission today released a staff
preliminary assessment of the proposed Reliability Standards. This
assessment is a preliminary technical analysis by staff and does not
offer legal conclusions or recommend any particular action to be taken
by the Commission. The Commission will issue a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NOPR) with its proposals on each Reliability Standard after
receiving comments on the staff preliminary assessment. Interested
persons will also have an opportunity to file comments on the NOPR.
    NERC should respond to this preliminary assessment by June 26,
2006. We also invite other interested persons to file comments on the
staff preliminary assessment by the comment date. Comments should
respond to individual Reliability Standards in the format used in the
preliminary assessment.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of comments using
the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file

electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of their
comments to the Secretary of the Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The staff preliminary assessment is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov
, using the ``eLibrary'' link

and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room
in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' link on the Web site
that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document
is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online
service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call (866) 208-
3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on June 26, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-7548 Filed 5-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 140 (Monday, July 22, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35118-35119]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15488]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0873]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Bar Code Label
Requirement for Human Drug and Biological Products

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by August
21, 2019.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>All

comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0537.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Domini Bean, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.

Bar Code Label Requirement for Human Drug and Biological Products

OMB Control Number 0910-0537--Extension

    In the Federal Register of February 26, 2004 (69 FR 9120), FDA
issued a final rule that requires human drug product and biological
product labels to have bar codes. Specifically, the final rule requires
bar codes on most human prescription drug products and on over-the-
counter (OTC) drug products that are dispensed under an order and
commonly used in healthcare facilities. It also requires machine-
readable information on blood and blood components. For human
prescription drug products and OTC drug products that are dispensed
under an order and commonly used in healthcare facilities, the bar code
must contain the national drug code number for the product. For blood
and blood components, the final rule specifies the minimum contents of
the label in a format that is machine readable and approved for use by
the Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. We believe
that the final rule helps reduce the number of medication errors in
hospitals and other healthcare settings by allowing healthcare
professionals to use bar code scanning equipment to verify that the
right drug (in the right dose and right route of administration) is
being given to the right patient at the right time.
    Although most of the information collections created by the final
rule have now been incorporated in OMB approved information collections
supporting the applicable regulations, respondents to the collection
may continue to seek an exemption from the bar code label requirement
under Sec.  201.25(d) (21 CFR 201.25(d)). Section 201.25(d) requires
submission of a written request for an exemption and describes the
information that must be included in such a request. Based on the
number of exemption requests we have received previously, we estimate
that approximately two exemption requests will be submitted annually
and each exemption request will require 24 hours to complete. This
results in an annual reporting burden of 48 hours, as reflected in
table 1.
    In the Federal Register of November 1, 2018 (83 FR 54930), we
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. No comments were received.
    We estimate the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                     Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of
                           21 CFR section                               Number of      responses per     Total annual   Average  burden    Total hours
                                                                       respondents       respondent       responses      per  response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21 CFR 201.25(d)...................................................               2                1                2               24               48
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    Based on a review of the information collection since our last
request for OMB approval, we have made no adjustments to our burden
estimate.

    Dated: July 16, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-15488 Filed 7-19-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P