[Federal Register: March 5, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 44)]
[Notices]
[Page 11910]
[DOCID:fr05mr08-58]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER08-387-000; ER08-387-001]

Atlantic Renewable Projects II LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

February 28, 2008.
    Atlantic Renewable Projects II LLC (Atlantic Renewables) filed an
application for market-based rate authority, with an accompanying
market-based rate tariff. The proposed market-based rate schedule
provides for the sale of energy, capacity and ancillary services at
market-based rates. Atlantic Renewables also requested waivers of
various Commission regulations. In particular, Atlantic Renewables
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR part
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability
by Atlantic Renewables.
    On February 22, 2008, pursuant to delegated authority, the
Director, Division of Tariffs and Market Development--West, granted the
request for blanket approval under part 34 (Director's Order). On
February 28, 2008, an Errata was issued to the Director's Order which
stated that the Commission would publish a separate notice in the
Federal Register establishing a period of time for the filing of
protests. Accordingly, any person desiring to be heard concerning the
blanket approvals of issuances of securities or assumptions of
liability by Atlantic Renewables, should file a protest with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214
(2007). The Commission encourages the electronic submission of protests
using the FERC Online link at http://www.ferc.gov.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests is
March 24, 2008.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition to such blanket
approvals by the deadline above, Atlantic Renewables is authorized to
issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a guarantor,
indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of another
person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some lawful
object within the corporate purposes of Atlantic Renewables, compatible
with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or appropriate
for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by
continued approvals of Atlantic Renewables' issuance of securities or
assumptions of liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-4221 Filed 3-4-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 16, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57756-57757]
[FR Doc No: 2020-18885]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 721

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0495; FRL-10013-95]
RIN 2070-AB27

Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Substances (19-
5.B); Technical Correction for PMN P-19-24

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued final significant new use rules (SNURs) in the
August 3, 2020 Federal Register for chemical substances that were the
subject of premanufacture notices (PMNs). EPA incorrectly identified
the Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number (CASRN) for the chemical
substance that was the subject of PMN P-19-24. This technical
correction is being issued to correct this error.

DATES: This technical correction is effective October 2, 2020. For
purposes of judicial review, this rule shall be promulgated at 1 p.m.
(e.s.t.) on September 30, 2020.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0495, is available at
http://www.regulations.gov. Due to the public health concerns related
to COVID-19, the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed
to visitors with limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide
remote customer service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest
status information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact:
William Wysong, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-4163; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. What does this technical correction do?

    EPA issued a final rule (referred to as SNUR Batch 19-5.B) in the
August 3, 2020 Federal Register (85 FR 46550) (FRL-10009-78) on
significant new uses for chemical substances that were the subject of
PMNs. EPA subsequently determined that the final rule incorrectly
identified the CASRN associated with the chemical substance
silsesquioxanes, 3-(dimethyloctadecylammonio)propyl Me Pr, polymers
with silicic acid (H4SiO4) tetra-Et ester, (2-hydroxyethoxy)- and
methoxy-terminated, chlorides (PMN P-19-24) codified at 40 CFR
721.11380. This action corrects the error as follows:
     Paragraph (a)(1) of the SNUR at 40 CFR 721.11380 is
corrected to identify the CASRN for the substance that was the subject
of PMN P-19-24 as 2231249-14-0.

II. Why is this correction issued as a final rule?

    Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B)) provides that, when an Agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the Agency may issue a final rule without
providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. EPA has
determined that there is good cause for making this technical
correction final without prior proposal and opportunity for comment.
Correcting the CASRN specified in the August 3, 2020 final rule is
necessary for the proper identification of the chemical substance which
is the subject of the SNUR at 40 CFR 721.11380. EPA finds that this
constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).

III. Do any of the statutory and Executive Order reviews apply to this
action?

    No. For a detailed discussion concerning the statutory and
Executive Order review, refer to Unit XII. of the August 3, 2020 final
rule.

IV. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    Pursuant to the CRA (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General
of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721

    Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: August 20, 2020.
Tala Henry,
Deputy Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.

    Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, 40 CFR part 721
is corrected as follows:

PART 721--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 721 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and 2625(c).

0
2. In Sec.  721.11380, revise paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:

Sec.  721.11380   Silsesquioxanes, 3-(dimethyloctadecylammonio)propyl
Me Pr, polymers with silicic acid (H4SiO4) tetra-Et ester, (2-
hydroxyethoxy)- and methoxy-terminated, chlorides.

    (a) * * * (1) The chemical substance identified as silsesquioxanes,
3-(dimethyloctadecylammonio)propyl Me Pr, polymers with silicic acid
(H4SiO4) tetra-Et ester, (2-hydroxyethoxy)- and methoxy-terminated,
chlorides. (P-19-24, CASRN 2231249-14-0) is subject to reporting under
this section for the significant new uses described in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-18885 Filed 9-15-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12077-12079]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04615]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R10-OAR-2013-0628: FRL-9907-38-Region 10]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Washington:
State Implementation Plan Miscellaneous Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving changes
to the Washington State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the
Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) dated November 20, 2013.
This SIP revision updates ambient air quality standards for carbon
monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and sulfur
dioxide.

DATES: This final rule is effective on April 3, 2014.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket Identification No. EPA-R10-OAR-2013-0628. All documents in the
docket are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information may not be publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material,
such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region 10, Office of Air,
Waste, and Toxics, AWT-107, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington
98101. The EPA requests that you contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The
Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hunt at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or the above EPA, Region 10 address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' are used, it is intended to refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    An explanation of the Clean Air Act requirements and implementing
regulations that are met by this State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submittal, a detailed explanation of the revision, and the EPA's
reasons for approving it were provided in the notice of proposed
rulemaking published on December 31, 2013, and will not be restated
here (78 FR 79652). The public comment period for this proposed rule
ended on January 30, 2014. The EPA did not receive any comments on the
proposal.

II. Final Action

    The EPA is approving Chapter 173-476 WAC Ambient Air Quality
Standards into the State of Washington's SIP. These changes are
consistent with, or more stringent than, the EPA's standards for carbon
monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and sulfur
dioxide. Additionally, Ecology repealed Chapter 173-470 WAC that
contained outdated standards for particulate matter, previously
approved into the SIP on January 15, 1993 (58 FR 4578). As described in
the proposed rulemaking for this action, the EPA has made a final
determination to remove Chapter 173-470 from the SIP because all
current particulate matter standards are now consolidated in the newly
created Chapter 173-476 WAC.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.);

     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law. The SIP is not approved to apply in
Indian country located in the state, except for non-trust land within
the exterior boundaries of the Puyallup Indian Reservation, also known
as the 1873 Survey Area. Under the Puyallup Tribe of Indians Settlement
Act of 1989, 25 U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly provided state and
local agencies in Washington authority over activities on non-trust
lands within the 1873 Survey Area and the EPA is therefore approving
this SIP on such lands. Consistent with EPA policy, the EPA nonetheless
provided a consultation opportunity to the Puyallup Tribe in a letter
dated September 3, 2013. The EPA did not receive a request for
consultation.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 5, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Carbon monoxide, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Sulfur dioxide, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: February 10, 2014.
Dennis J. McLerran
Regional Administrator, Region 10.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart WW--Washington

0
2. Section 52.2470 is amended in paragraph (c) ``Table 1--Washington
Department of Ecology Regulations'' by:
0
a. Removing the heading ``Washington Administrative Code, Chapter 173-
470--Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter'' and adding
in its place ``Washington Administrative Code, Chapter 173-476--Ambient
Air Quality Standards'';
0
b. Removing entries 173-470-010 through 173-470-160; and
0
c. Adding in numerical order entries 173-476-010 through 173-476-900
under the new heading ``Washington Administrative Code, Chapter 173-
476--Ambient Air Quality Standards''.
    The added and revised text read as follows:

Sec.  52.  2470 Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                              Table 1--Washington Department of Ecology Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              State
        State citation               Title/subject       effective date     EPA approval date      Explanations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Washington Administrative Code, Chapter 173-476--Ambient Air Quality Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
173-476-010..................  Purpose.................        12/22/13  3/4/14 [Insert page      ..............
                                                                          number where the
                                                                          document begins].
173-476-020..................  Applicability...........        12/22/13  3/4/14 [Insert page      ..............
                                                                          number where the
                                                                          document begins].
173-476-030..................  Definitions.............        12/22/13  3/4/14 [Insert page      ..............
                                                                          number where the
                                                                          document begins].
173-476-100..................  Ambient Air Quality             12/22/13  3/4/14 [Insert page      ..............
                                Standard for PM-10.                       number where the
                                                                          document begins].
173-476-110..................  Ambient Air Quality             12/22/13  3/4/14 [Insert page      ..............
                                Standards for PM-2.5.                     number where the
                                                                          document begins].
173-476-120..................  Ambient Air Quality             12/22/13  3/4/14 [Insert page      ..............
                                Standard for Lead (Pb).                   number where the
                                                                          document begins].

173-476-130..................  Ambient Air Quality             12/22/13  3/4/14 [Insert page      ..............
                                Standards for Sulfur                      number where the
                                Oxides (Sulfur Dioxide).                  document begins].
173-476-140..................  Ambient Air Quality             12/22/13  3/4/14 [Insert page      ..............
                                Standards for Nitrogen                    number where the
                                Oxides (Nitrogen                          document begins].
                                Dioxide).
173-476-150..................  Ambient Air Quality             12/22/13  3/4/14 [Insert page      ..............
                                Standard for Ozone.                       number where the
                                                                          document begins].
173-476-160..................  Ambient Air Quality             12/22/13  3/4/14 [Insert page      ..............
                                Standards for Carbon                      number where the
                                Monoxide.                                 document begins].
173-476-170..................  Monitor Siting Criteria.        12/22/13  3/4/14 [Insert page      ..............
                                                                          number where the
                                                                          document begins].
173-476-180..................  Reference Conditions....        12/22/13  3/4/14 [Insert page      ..............
                                                                          number where the
                                                                          document begins].
173-476-900..................  Table of Standards......        12/22/13  3/4/14 [Insert page      ..............
                                                                          number where the
                                                                          document begins].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2014-04615 Filed 3-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3866-3868]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30918]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0587; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-219-AD;
Amendment 39-18059; AD 2014-26-08]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2011-13-09 for
all Airbus Model A330-200, -200F, and -300 series airplanes. AD 2011-
13-09 required revising the maintenance program to incorporate new
limitations and maintenance tasks for certain certification management
requirements (CMRs). This new AD requires revising the maintenance or
inspection program to incorporate new maintenance requirements and
airworthiness limitations. This AD was prompted by a determination that
more restrictive maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations
are necessary. We are issuing this AD to prevent safety-significant
latent failures that would, in combination with one or more other
specific failures or events, result in a hazardous or catastrophic
failure condition.

DATES: This AD becomes effective March 2, 2015.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 2,
2015.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain other publication listed in this AD as of August
1, 2011 (76 FR 37255, June 27, 2011).

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0587; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2011-13-09, Amendment 39-16732 (76 FR 37255,
June 27, 2011). AD 2011-13-09 applied to all Airbus Model A330-200, -
200F, and -300 series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on August 26, 2014 (79 FR 50869).
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013-0245, dated October 2, 2013 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus Model
A330-200, -200F, and -300 series airplanes. The MCAI states:

    The airworthiness limitations are currently distributed in the
Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS).
    The mandatory instructions and airworthiness limitations
applicable to the Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMR) are
specified in Airbus A330 ALS Part 3, which is approved by the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).
    The revision 04 of Airbus A330 ALS Part 3 introduces more
restrictive maintenance requirements and/or airworthiness
limitations. Failure to comply with this revision constitutes an
unsafe condition.
    For the reason described above, this new AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2010-0264 [(http://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2010_0264.pdf)], which is superseded, and requires the
implementation of the maintenance requirements as specified in
Airbus A330 ALS Part 3 revision 04.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0587-0002.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (79 FR 50869, August 26,
2014) or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed, with minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (79 FR 50869, August 26, 2014) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 50869, August 26, 2014).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 76 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    The actions required by AD 2011-13-09, Amendment 39-16732 (76 FR
37255, June 27, 2011), and retained in this AD take about 1 work-hour
per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per work-hour. Based on
these figures, the estimated cost of the actions that were required by
AD 2011-13-09 is $85 per product.
    We also estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost
of this AD on U.S. operators to be $6,460, or $85 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.

    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0587; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2011-13-09, Amendment 39-16732 (76 FR 37255, June 27, 2011), and adding
the following new AD:

2014-26-08 Airbus: Amendment 39-18059. Docket No. FAA-2014-0587;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-219-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective March 2, 2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2011-13-09, Amendment 39-16732 (76 FR 37255,
June 27, 2011).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223,
-223F -243, -243F, -301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342,
and -343 airplanes, certificated in any category, all manufacturer
serial numbers.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Periodic
inspections.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a determination that more restrictive
maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations are
necessary. We are issuing this AD to prevent safety-significant
latent failures that would, in combination with one or more other
specific failures or events, result in a hazardous or catastrophic
failure condition.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Revision of the Maintenance Program

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2011-13-09, Amendment 39-16732 (76 FR 37255, June 27, 2011). Within
90 days after August 1, 2011 (the effective date of AD 2011-13-09):
Revise the maintenance program, which ensures the continuing
airworthiness of each operated airplane, by incorporating Airbus
A330 ALS, Part 3--Certification Maintenance Requirements, Revision
03, dated July 29, 2010. Within the times specified in the Airbus
A330 ALS, Part 3--Certification Maintenance Requirements, Revision
03, dated July 29, 2010, comply with all applicable maintenance
requirements and associated airworthiness limitations included in
Airbus A330 ALS, Part 3--Certification Maintenance Requirements,
Revision 03, dated July 29, 2010, except as provided by paragraphs
(h) and (i) of this AD.

(h) Retained Exceptions to the Certification Maintenance Requirements
(CMR) Tasks

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2011-13-09, Amendment 39-16732 (76 FR 37255, June 27, 2011). At the
latest of the times specified in paragraph (h)(1), (h)(2), or (h)(3)
of this AD: Do the first accomplishment of Airbus A330 CMR Task
213100-00001-2-C, Pressure Control Monitoring, of Airbus A330 ALS,
Part 3--Certification Maintenance Requirements, Revision 03, dated
July 29, 2010.
    (1) Before the accumulation of 48,000 total flight hours.
    (2) Within 48,000 flight hours after the most recent
accomplishment of Airbus A330 Maintenance Review Board Report (MRBR)
Task 21.31.00/05.
    (3) Within 3 months after August 1, 2011 (the effective date of
AD 2011-13-09, Amendment 39-16732 (76 FR 37255, June 27, 2011).

(i) Retained Exceptions to the CMR Tasks

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD
2011-13-09, Amendment 39-16732 (76 FR 37255, June 27, 2011). At the
latest of the times specified in paragraph (i)(1), (i)(2), or (i)(3)
of this AD: Do the first accomplishment of Airbus A330 CMR Tasks
242000-00005-1-C, AC Generation;<PHONE_NUMBER>1-1-C, DC Generation;
and<PHONE_NUMBER>2-1-C, DC Generation; of Airbus A330 ALS, Part 3--
Certification Maintenance Requirements, Revision 03, dated July 29,
2010.
    (1) Before the accumulation of 12,000 total flight hours.
    (2) Within 12,000 flight hours after the most recent
accomplishment of Airbus A330 MRBR Task 24.20.00/17, 24.30.00/04, or
24.30.00/05 respectively.
    (3) Within 3 months after August 1, 2011 (the effective date of
AD 2011-13-09, Amendment 39-16732 (76 FR 37255, June 27, 2011).

(j) Retained Limitation of Alternative Inspections or Intervals

    This paragraph restates the limitation specified in paragraph
(j) of AD 2011-13-09, Amendment 39-16732 (76 FR 37255, June 27,
2011). After accomplishing the action required by paragraph (g) of
this AD, no alternative inspections or inspection intervals may be
used, other than those specified in Airbus A330 ALS, Part 3--
Certification Maintenance Requirements, Revision 03, dated July 29,
2010, unless the inspections or intervals are approved as an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (m) of this AD.

(k) New Requirements of This AD: Revise the Maintenance or Inspection
Program

    (1) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD: Revise
the maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate
Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section ALS Part 3--
Certification Maintenance Requirements, Revision 04, dated August
27, 2013. Within the applicable compliance time defined in the
``Record of Revisions'' section of Airbus A330

Airworthiness Limitations Section ALS Part 3--Certification
Maintenance Requirements, Revision 04, dated August 27, 2013, except
as provided by paragraph (k)(2) of this AD, accomplish all
applicable maintenance tasks. Accomplishing these actions terminates
the requirements of paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (j) of this AD.
    (2) Where paragraph 3 of the ``Record of Revisions'' section of
Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section ALS Part 3--
Certification Maintenance Requirements, Revision 04, dated August
27, 2013, specifies accomplishing the actions ``from 27 August
2013,'' this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance
time after the effective date of this AD.

(l) No Alternative Inspections or Intervals

    After accomplishing the action required by paragraph (k)(1) of
this AD, no alternative inspections or inspection intervals may be
used, other than those specified in Airbus A330 Airworthiness
Limitations Section ALS Part 3--Certification Maintenance
Requirements, Revision 04, dated August 27, 2013, except as provided
by paragraph (k)(2) of this AD, unless the inspections or intervals
are approved as an AMOC in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (m) of this AD.

(m) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information
may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.

(n) Related Information

    Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI)
EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013-0245, dated October 2, 2013, for
related information. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-
2014-0587-0002.

(o) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
March 2, 2015.
    (i) Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section ALS Part 3--
Certification Maintenance Requirements, Revision 04, dated August
27, 2013. The revision level of this document is identified on only
the title page and in the Record of Revisions. The revision date is
not identified on the title page of this document.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (4) The following service information was approved for IBR on
August 1, 2011 (76 FR 37255, June 27, 2011).
    (i) Airbus A330 ALS Part 3--Certification Maintenance
Requirements, Revision 03, dated July 29, 2010. The revision level
of this document is identified on only the title page and in the
Record of Revisions. The revision date is not identified on the
title page of this document.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (5) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet
http://www.airbus.com.
    (6) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (7) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 19, 2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-30918 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 245 (Monday, December 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 76315]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29900]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP15-260-000.
    Applicants: Nautilus Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Changes to FT-2
Schedule to be effective 1/10/2015.
    Filed Date: 12/11/14.
    Accession Number: 20141211-5104.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/23/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-261-000.
    Applicants: Enable Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: RS EFT Revisions
2014 to be effective 2/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 12/11/14.
    Accession Number: 20141211-5131.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/23/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-262-000.
    Applicants: American Midstream (Midla), LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Midla Reservation
Rate Crediting Provision to be effective 2/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 12/11/14.
    Accession Number: 20141211-5175.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/23/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-258-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: (doc-less) Motion to Intervene of Northern Illinois
Gas Company d/b/a Nicor Gas Company.
    Filed Date: 12/12/14.
    Accession Number: 20141212-5050.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/24/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-263-000.
    Applicants: Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Reserved Capacity
for Pre-Arranged Deals & ROFR Waiver to be effective 1/12/2015.
    Filed Date: 12/12/14.
    Accession Number: 20141212-5032.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/24/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-264-000.
    Applicants: Viking Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Update Non-
Conforming Agreements (2014) to be effective 1/12/2015.
    Filed Date: 12/12/14.
    Accession Number: 20141212-5072.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/24/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-265-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.601: Non-Conforming
Agreements Update (MGS) to be effective 1/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 12/12/14.
    Accession Number: 20141212-5138.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/24/14.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered,
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP12-318-007.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Reservation Charge
Credit Dec2014 Errata Filing to be effective 12/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 12/11/14.
    Accession Number: 20141211-5161.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/23/14.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 15, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29900 Filed 12-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 13, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3701-3703]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02057]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2017-0212; FRL-9989-23-Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Reasonable Further Progress Plan
and Other Plan Elements for the Moderate Nonattainment Chicago Area for
the 2008 Ozone Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing
approval of a revision to the Wisconsin State Implementation Plan (SIP)
to meet the base year emissions inventory, reasonable further progress
(RFP), RFP contingency measure, nitrogen oxides (NOX)
reasonably available control technology (RACT), and motor vehicle
inspection and maintenance (I/M) requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) for the Wisconsin portion of the Chicago-Naperville, Illinois-
Indiana-Wisconsin nonattainment area (Chicago area) for the 2008 ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or standards). EPA is
also finalizing approval of the 2017 and 2018 transportation conformity
motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the Wisconsin portion of
the Chicago area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. EPA proposed approval of
these attainment planning elements on August 16, 2018,

and received no adverse comments germane to this action. Therefore, EPA
is finalizing approval of this SIP revision pursuant to section 110 and
part D of the CAA and EPA's regulations because it satisfies the
emission inventory, RFP, RFP contingency measure, NOX RACT,
I/M, and transportation conformity requirements for the Wisconsin
portion of the Chicago area, which is classified as moderate
nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.

DATES: This final rule is effective on March 15, 2019.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2017-0212. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
through www.regulations.gov or at the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We recommend
that you telephone Jenny Liljegren, Physical Scientist, at (312) 886-
6832 before visiting the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jenny Liljegren, Physical Scientist,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. What is the background for this action?
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What is the background for this action?

A. Background on the 2008 Ozone NAAQS

    On March 27, 2008, EPA promulgated a revised 8-hour ozone NAAQS of
0.075 parts per million (ppm).\1\ Promulgation of a revised NAAQS
triggers a requirement for EPA to designate areas of the country as
nonattainment, attainment, or unclassifiable for the standards. For the
ozone NAAQS, this also involves classifying any nonattainment areas at
the time of designation.\2\ Ozone nonattainment areas are classified
based on the severity of their ozone levels (as determined based on the
area's ``design value,'' which represents air quality in the area for
the most recent three years). The classifications for ozone
nonattainment areas are marginal, moderate, serious, severe, and
extreme.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 73 FR 16436.
    \2\ CAA sections 107(d)(1) and 181(a)(1).
    \3\ CAA section 181(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Areas that EPA designates nonattainment for the ozone NAAQS are
subject to certain requirements, including the general nonattainment
area planning requirements of CAA section 172 and the ozone-specific
nonattainment planning requirements of CAA section 182. Ozone
nonattainment areas in the lower classification levels have fewer and/
or less stringent mandatory air quality planning and control
requirements than those in higher classifications. For marginal areas,
a state is required to submit a baseline emissions inventory, adopt
provisions into the SIP requiring emissions statements from stationary
sources in the area, and implement a nonattainment new source review
(NSR) program for the relevant ozone NAAQS.\4\ For moderate areas, a
state needs to comply with the marginal area requirements, plus
additional moderate area requirements, including the requirement to
submit a modeled demonstration that the area will attain the NAAQS as
expeditiously as practicable but no later than six years after
designation, the requirement to submit an RFP plan, the requirement to
adopt and implement certain emissions controls, such as RACT and I/M,
and the requirement for greater emissions offsets for new or modified
major stationary sources under the state's nonattainment NSR
program.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ CAA section 182(a).
    \5\ CAA section 182(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Background on the Chicago 2008 Ozone Nonattainment Area

    On June 11, 2012,\6\ EPA designated the Chicago area as a marginal
nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The Chicago area includes
Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties and part of Grundy
and Kendall Counties in Illinois; Lake and Porter Counties in Indiana;
and the eastern portion of Kenosha County in Wisconsin. On May 4,
2016,\7\ pursuant to section 181(b)(2) of the CAA, EPA determined that
the Chicago area failed to attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS by the July 20,
2015, marginal area attainment deadline and thus reclassified the area
from marginal to moderate nonattainment. In that action, EPA
established January 1, 2017, as the due date for all moderate area
nonattainment plan SIP requirements applicable to newly reclassified
areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 77 FR 34221, effective July 20, 2012.
    \7\ 81 FR 26697.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. What action is EPA taking?

    As explained in the proposed rulemaking,\8\ EPA is approving
revisions to Wisconsin's SIP pursuant to section 110 and part D of the
CAA and EPA's regulations. Wisconsin's April 17, 2017, submission and
January 23, 2018, supplement along with a prior submission made on
August 15, 2016, satisfy the emission inventory, RFP, RFP contingency
measure, NOX RACT, emissions statement, I/M, and
transportation conformity requirements for the Wisconsin portion of the
Chicago area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 83 FR 40715 (August 16, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by April 15, 2019. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: December 20, 2018.
James O. Payne,
Acting Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. Section 52.2585 is amended by adding paragraph (ff) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.2585   Control strategy: Ozone.

* * * * *
    (ff) Approval--On April 17, 2017, as supplemented on January 23,
2018, Wisconsin submitted a revision to its State Implementation Plan
along with a prior submission on August 15, 2016, to satisfy the
emissions statement, emission inventory, reasonable further progress
(RFP), RFP contingency measure, oxides of nitrogen (NOX)
reasonably available control technology (RACT), motor vehicle
inspection and maintenance (I/M), and transportation conformity
requirements for the Wisconsin portion of the Chicago area for the 2008
ozone NAAQS moderate nonattainment plan. These elements of the plan
meet the requirements of section 110 and part D of the CAA for the
Wisconsin portion of the Chicago area, which was reclassified on May 4,
2016, as moderate nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The April 17,
2017, submittal as supplemented on January 23, 2018, also established
new Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEB) for volatile organic
compounds (VOC) and NOX for the years 2017 and 2018. The
MVEBs for the Wisconsin portion of the Chicago 2008 ozone NAAQS
nonattainment area, which is the portion of Kenosha County inclusive
and east of Interstate 94, are now: 1.56 tons per summer day of VOC
emissions and 3.05 tons per summer day of NOX emissions for
the year 2017, and 1.44 tons per summer day of VOC emissions and 2.75
tons per summer day of NOX emissions for the year 2018.

[FR Doc. 2019-02057 Filed 2-12-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


State CAMR 2010 Hg Emissions ( Tons) Final CAMR 2010 State Hg Budget Final CAMR 2010 Budget: Emissions Pure Heat Input Method 2010 State Budget Pure Heat Input Budget: Emissions State CAIR only 2010 Hg Emissions ( Tons) Final CAMR 2010 State Hg Budget Final CAMR Hg Budget: Emissions Pure Heat Input Method 2010 State Budget Alabama 0.941 1.289 1.37 1.448 1.54 Alabama 0.973 1.289 1.33 1.448 Arizona 0.320 0.454 1.42 0.435 1.36 Arizona 0.320 0.454 1.42 0.435 Arkansas 0.866 0.516 0.60 0.491 0.57 Arkansas 0.866 0.516 0.60 0.491 California 0.072 0.041 0.57 0.049 0.68 California 0.127 0.041 0.32 0.049 Colorado 0.243 0.706 2.90 0.714 2.93 Colorado 0.253 0.706 2.79 0.714 Connecticut 0.039 0.053 1.36 0.063 1.62 Connecticut 0.036 0.053 1.47 0.063 Delaware 0.117 0.072 0.61 0.085 0.73 Delaware 0.125 0.072 0.58 0.085 District Of Columbia      District Of Columbia     Florida 0.561 1.232 2.20 1.454 2.59 Florida 0.650 1.232 1.90 1.454 Georgia 1.690 1.227 0.73 1.406 0.83 Georgia 1.693 1.227 0.72 1.406 Idaho      Idaho     Illinois 1.467 1.594 1.09 1.659 1.13 Illinois 1.788 1.594 0.89 1.659 Indiana 1.630 2.097 1.29 2.337 1.43 Indiana 1.785 2.097 1.17 2.337 Iowa 0.818 0.727 0.89 0.700 0.86 Iowa 1.092 0.727 0.67 0.700 Kansas 1.035 0.723 0.70 0.698 0.67 Kansas 1.035 0.723 0.70 0.698 Kentucky 0.950 1.525 1.60 1.806 1.90 Kentucky 1.174 1.525 1.30 1.806 Louisiana 0.385 0.601 1.56 0.457 1.19 Louisiana 0.405 0.601 1.49 0.457 Maine 0.015 0.001 0.07 0.002 0.13 Maine 0.045 0.001 0.02 0.002 Maryland 0.279 0.490 1.76 0.582 2.09 Maryland 0.362 0.490 1.35 0.582 Massachusetts 0.245 0.172 0.70 0.204 0.83 Massachusetts 0.253 0.172 0.68 0.204 Michigan 1.229 1.303 1.06 1.366 1.11 Michigan 1.269 1.303 1.03 1.366 Minnesota 0.642 0.695 1.08 0.670 1.04 Minnesota 0.684 0.695 1.02 0.670 Mississippi 0.237 0.291 1.23 0.327 1.38 Mississippi 0.212 0.291 1.37 0.327 Missouri 1.530 1.393 0.91 1.358 0.89 Missouri 2.302 1.393 0.61 1.358 Montana 0.317 0.377 1.19 0.348 1.10 Montana 0.318 0.377 1.19 0.348 Navajo Nation 0.550 0.600 1.09 0.640 1.16 Navajo Nation 0.550 0.600 1.09 0.640 Nebraska 0.548 0.421 0.77 0.401 0.73 Nebraska 0.551 0.421 0.76 0.401 Nevada 0.242 0.285 1.18 0.338 1.40 Nevada 0.244 0.285 1.17 0.338 New Hampshire 0.048 0.063 1.33 0.075 1.58 New Hampshire 0.048 0.063 1.33 0.075 New Jersey 0.177 0.153 0.86 0.181 1.02 New Jersey 0.409 0.153 0.37 0.181 New Mexico 0.394 0.299 0.76 0.285 0.72 New Mexico 0.396 0.299 0.76 0.285 New York 0.399 0.393 0.99 0.467 1.17 New York 0.745 0.393 0.53 0.467 North Carolina 1.254 1.133 0.90 1.347 1.07 North Carolina 1.379 1.133 0.82 1.347 North Dakota 0.930 1.564 1.68 0.620 0.67 North Dakota 0.955 1.564 1.64 0.620 Ohio 1.142 2.056 1.80 2.428 2.13 Ohio 1.587 2.056 1.30 2.428 Oklahoma 1.089 0.721 0.66 0.695 0.64 Oklahoma 1.087 0.721 0.66 0.695 Oregon 0.049 0.076 1.55 0.075 1.53 Oregon 0.049 0.076 1.55 0.075 Pennsylvania 1.375 1.779 1.29 2.116 1.54 Pennsylvania 3.908 1.779 0.46 2.116 Rhode Island      Rhode Island     South Carolina 0.369 0.580 1.57 0.689 1.87 South Carolina 0.372 0.580 1.56 0.689 South Dakota 0.076 0.072 0.94 0.069 0.90 South Dakota 0.080 0.072 0.90 0.069 Tennessee 0.580 0.944 1.63 1.101 1.90 Tennessee 0.567 0.944 1.67 1.101 Texas 3.212 4.656 1.45 2.776 0.86 Texas 3.233 4.656 1.44 2.776 Utah 0.188 0.506 2.69 0.602 3.20 Utah 0.197 0.506 2.57 0.602 Ute Indian Tribe 0.008 0.060 7.41 0.071 8.77 Ute Indian Tribe 0.008 0.060 7.41 0.071 Vermont      Vermont     Virginia 0.455 0.592 1.30 0.704 1.55 Virginia 0.564 0.592 1.05 0.704 Washington 0.264 0.198 0.75 0.188 0.71 Washington 0.266 0.198 0.74 0.188 West Virginia 0.716 1.394 1.95 1.658 2.32 West Virginia 1.694 1.394 0.82 1.658 Wisconsin 1.110 0.890 0.80 0.878 0.79 Wisconsin 1.178 0.890 0.76 0.878 Wyoming 0.629 0.952 1.51 0.905 1.44 Wyoming 0.911 0.952 1.05 0.905 Total 31.426 37.966 1.21 37.968 1.21 Total 38.737 37.966 0.98 37.968 avg ratio 1.25 1.34 avg ratio 1.12 Note: Alaska and Hawaii are not included in this analysis because these States are not included in our IPM modeling. ( This accounts for the difference between the total budgets here and the 38 ton and 15 ton CAMR caps.) 2010 State by State Coverage Ratios using Projected Emissions from CAMR Control Case: CAMR & Pure Heat Input Methods 2010 State by State Coverage Ratios using Projected Emissions from C & Pure Heat Input Methods Pure Heat Input Budget: Emissions 1.49 1.36 0.57 0.38 2.82 1.75 0.68  2.24 0.83  0.93 1.31 0.64 0.67 1.54 1.13 0.04 1.61 0.81 1.08 0.98 1.54 0.59 1.10 1.16 0.73 1.38 1.58 0.44 0.72 0.63 0.98 0.65 1.53 0.64 1.53 0.54  1.85 0.87 1.94 0.86 3.06 8.77  1.25 0.71 0.98 0.75 0.99 0.98 1.19 ets presented CAIR: CAMR Coverage Ratio ( State Budget : Projected Emissions)

State CAMR Emissions HI CAMR Ratio Disparity Ratio Disparity Ute Indian Tribe 0.008 0.071 0.060 8.765 7.557 7.407 6.199 Colorado 0.243 0.714 0.706 2.935 1.726 2.902 1.694 Utah 0.188 0.602 0.506 3.197 1.989 2.687 1.479 Florida 0.561 1.454 1.232 2.593 1.385 2.197 0.989 West Virginia 0.716 1.658 1.394 2.317 1.109 1.948 0.740 Ohio 1.142 2.428 2.056 2.126 0.918 1.801 0.593 Maryland 0.279 0.582 0.490 2.088 0.880 1.758 0.550 North Dakota 0.930 0.620 1.564 0.667 0.541 1.682 0.474 Tennessee 0.580 1.101 0.944 1.899 0.690 1.628 0.420 Kentucky 0.950 1.806 1.525 1.901 0.692 1.605 0.397 South Carolina 0.369 0.689 0.580 1.869 0.661 1.574 0.365 Louisiana 0.385 0.457 0.601 1.188 0.021 1.562 0.354 Oregon 0.049 0.075 0.076 1.527 0.319 1.548 0.340 Wyoming 0.629 0.905 0.952 1.439 0.231 1.514 0.306 Texas 3.212 2.776 4.656 0.864 0.344 1.449 0.241 Arizona 0.320 0.435 0.454 1.360 0.152 1.420 0.212 Alabama 0.941 1.448 1.289 1.540 0.331 1.371 0.162 Connecticut 0.039 0.063 0.053 1.620 0.411 1.362 0.154 New Hampshire 0.048 0.075 0.063 1.579 0.371 1.326 0.118 Virginia 0.455 0.704 0.592 1.547 0.339 1.301 0.093 Pennsylvania 1.375 2.116 1.779 1.539 0.331 1.294 0.086 Indiana 1.630 2.337 2.097 1.434 0.226 1.287 0.079 Mississippi 0.237 0.327 0.291 1.383 0.174 1.230 0.022 Montana 0.317 0.348 0.377 1.096 0.112 1.188 0.020 Nevada 0.242 0.338 0.285 1.396 0.188 1.177 0.031 Navajo Nation 0.550 0.640 0.600 1.165 0.043 1.092 0.116 Illinois 1.467 1.659 1.594 1.131 0.077 1.087 0.121 Minnesota 0.642 0.670 0.695 1.043 0.165 1.082 0.126 Michigan 1.229 1.366 1.303 1.111 0.097 1.060 0.148 New York 0.399 0.467 0.393 1.171 0.037 0.986 0.222 South Dakota 0.076 0.069 0.072 0.904 0.304 0.944 0.264 Missouri 1.530 1.358 1.393 0.888 0.320 0.911 0.298 North Carolina 1.254 1.347 1.133 1.075 0.134 0.904 0.304 Iowa 0.818 0.700 0.727 0.856 0.352 0.889 0.319 New Jersey 0.177 0.181 0.153 1.021 0.187 0.863 0.345 Wisconsin 1.110 0.878 0.890 0.791 0.417 0.802 0.406 Nebraska 0.548 0.401 0.421 0.732 0.476 0.768 0.440 New Mexico 0.394 0.285 0.299 0.723 0.485 0.758 0.450 Washington 0.264 0.188 0.198 0.713 0.495 0.751 0.457 Georgia 1.690 1.406 1.227 0.832 0.376 0.726 0.482 Massachusetts 0.245 0.204 0.172 0.834 0.374 0.703 0.505 Kansas 1.035 0.698 0.723 0.675 0.534 0.699 0.509 Oklahoma 1.089 0.695 0.721 0.638 0.570 0.662 0.546 Delaware 0.117 0.085 0.072 0.726 0.482 0.615 0.593 Arkansas 0.866 0.491 0.516 0.567 0.641 0.596 0.612 California 0.072 0.049 0.041 0.681 0.528 0.569 0.639 Maine 0.015 0.002 0.001 0.132 1.077 0.066 1.142 District of Columbia     1.208  1.208 Idaho     1.208  1.208 Rhode Island     1.208  1.208 Vermont     1.208  1.208 Total 31.426 37.968 37.966 1.208 34.703 1.208 29.994 Average 1.339 0.680 1.250 0.588 2010 Allowance Comparability Note: Alaska and Hawaii are not included in this analysis because these States are not included in our IPM modeling. ( This accounts for the difference between the total budgets presented here and the 38 ton and 15 ton CAMR caps.) Allowance Budget Heat Input CAMR Projected 2010 Emissions and Budget 2010 State by State CAMR Control Case Coverage Ratios, CAMR & Pure Heat Input Methods State CAMR 2010 Hg Emissions ( Tons) Final CAMR 2010 State Hg Budget Pure Heat Input Method 2010 State Budget State Coverage Ratio: Budget to Emission Difference ( from 1.208) Absolute Difference ( from 1.208) Coverage Ratio: Budget to Emission Difference ( from 1.208) Absolute Difference ( from 1.208)

Alabama 0.941 1.289 1.448 Alabama 1.371 0.162 0.162 1.540 0.331 0.331 Arizona 0.320 0.454 0.435 Arizona 1.420 0.212 0.212 1.360 0.152 0.152 Arkansas 0.866 0.516 0.491 Arkansas 0.596  0.612 0.612 0.567  0.641 0.641 California 0.072 0.041 0.049 California 0.569  0.639 0.639 0.681  0.528 0.528 Colorado 0.243 0.706 0.714 Colorado 2.902 1.694 1.694 2.935 1.726 1.726 Connecticut 0.039 0.053 0.063 Connecticut 1.362 0.154 0.154 1.620 0.411 0.411 Delaware 0.117 0.072 0.085 Delaware 0.615  0.593 0.593 0.726  0.482 0.482 District Of Columbia    District Of Columbia   1.208 1.208   1.208 1.208 Florida 0.561 1.232 1.454 Florida 2.197 0.989 0.989 2.593 1.385 1.385 Georgia 1.690 1.227 1.406 Georgia 0.726  0.482 0.482 0.832  0.376 0.376 Idaho    Idaho   1.208 1.208   1.208 1.208 Illinois 1.467 1.594 1.659 Illinois 1.087  0.121 0.121 1.131  0.077 0.077 Indiana 1.630 2.097 2.337 Indiana 1.287 0.079 0.079 1.434 0.226 0.226 Iowa 0.818 0.727 0.700 Iowa 0.889  0.319 0.319 0.856  0.352 0.352 Kansas 1.035 0.723 0.698 Kansas 0.699  0.509 0.509 0.675  0.534 0.534 Kentucky 0.950 1.525 1.806 Kentucky 1.605 0.397 0.397 1.901 0.692 0.692 Louisiana 0.385 0.601 0.457 Louisiana 1.562 0.354 0.354 1.188  0.021 0.021 Maine 0.015 0.001 0.002 Maine 0.066  1.142 1.142 0.132  1.077 1.077 Maryland 0.279 0.490 0.582 Maryland 1.758 0.550 0.550 2.088 0.880 0.880 Massachusetts 0.245 0.172 0.204 Massachusetts 0.703  0.505 0.505 0.834  0.374 0.374 Michigan 1.229 1.303 1.366 Michigan 1.060  0.148 0.148 1.111  0.097 0.097 Minnesota 0.642 0.695 0.670 Minnesota 1.082  0.126 0.126 1.043  0.165 0.165 Mississippi 0.237 0.291 0.327 Mississippi 1.230 0.022 0.022 1.383 0.174 0.174 Missouri 1.530 1.393 1.358 Missouri 0.911  0.298 0.298 0.888  0.320 0.320 Montana 0.317 0.377 0.348 Montana 1.188  0.020 0.020 1.096  0.112 0.112 Navajo Nation 0.550 0.600 0.640 Navajo Nation 1.092  0.116 0.116 1.165  0.043 0.043 Nebraska 0.548 0.421 0.401 Nebraska 0.768  0.440 0.440 0.732  0.476 0.476 Nevada 0.242 0.285 0.338 Nevada 1.177  0.031 0.031 1.396 0.188 0.188 New Hampshire 0.048 0.063 0.075 New Hampshire 1.326 0.118 0.118 1.579 0.371 0.371 New Jersey 0.177 0.153 0.181 New Jersey 0.863  0.345 0.345 1.021  0.187 0.187 New Mexico 0.394 0.299 0.285 New Mexico 0.758  0.450 0.450 0.723  0.485 0.485 New York 0.399 0.393 0.467 New York 0.986  0.222 0.222 1.171  0.037 0.037 North Carolina 1.254 1.133 1.347 North Carolina 0.904  0.304 0.304 1.075  0.134 0.134 North Dakota 0.930 1.564 0.620 North Dakota 1.682 0.474 0.474 0.667  0.541 0.541 Ohio 1.142 2.056 2.428 Ohio 1.801 0.593 0.593 2.126 0.918 0.918 Oklahoma 1.089 0.721 0.695 Oklahoma 0.662  0.546 0.546 0.638  0.570 0.570 Oregon 0.049 0.076 0.075 Oregon 1.548 0.340 0.340 1.527 0.319 0.319 Pennsylvania 1.375 1.779 2.116 Pennsylvania 1.294 0.086 0.086 1.539 0.331 0.331 Rhode Island    Rhode Island   1.208 1.208   1.208 1.208 South Carolina 0.369 0.580 0.689 South Carolina 1.574 0.365 0.365 1.869 0.661 0.661 South Dakota 0.076 0.072 0.069 South Dakota 0.944  0.264 0.264 0.904  0.304 0.304 Tennessee 0.580 0.944 1.101 Tennessee 1.628 0.420 0.420 1.899 0.690 0.690 Texas 3.212 4.656 2.776 Texas 1.449 0.241 0.241 0.864  0.344 0.344 Utah 0.188 0.506 0.602 Utah 2.687 1.479 1.479 3.197 1.989 1.989 Ute Indian Tribe 0.008 0.060 0.071 Ute Indian Tribe 7.407 6.199 6.199 8.765 7.557 7.557 Vermont    Vermont   1.208 1.208   1.208 1.208 Virginia 0.455 0.592 0.704 Virginia 1.301 0.093 0.093 1.547 0.339 0.339 Washington 0.264 0.198 0.188 Washington 0.751  0.457 0.457 0.713  0.495 0.495 West Virginia 0.716 1.394 1.658 West Virginia 1.948 0.740 0.740 2.317 1.109 1.109 Wisconsin 1.110 0.890 0.878 Wisconsin 0.802  0.406 0.406 0.791  0.417 0.417 Wyoming 0.629 0.952 0.905 Wyoming 1.514 0.306 0.306 1.439 0.231 0.231 Total 31.426 37.966 37.968 Total 1.208 2.138 29.994 1.208 6.662 34.703 Average 1.25 0.04 0.59 1.34 0.13 0.68 Note: The aggregate coverage ratio under CAMR is 1.208 ( instead of 1.0) because in 2010 the total C CAMR Control Case Difference of State by State Hg Coverage Ratios ( Budget: Emissions) from Regionwide Percent Reduction Final CAMR Pure Heat Input Average Coverage Ratio 1.25 1.34 Average Difference 0.04 0.13 Cumulative Absolute Difference 29.99 34.70 Average Absolute Difference 0.59 0.68 Note: Alaska and Hawaii are not included in this analysis because these States are not included in our IPM modeling. ( This accounts for the difference between the to budgets presented here and the 38 ton and 15 ton CAMR caps.) 2010 State Budgets and Projected CAMR Control Emissions 2010 CAMR Hg Pure Heat Input 2010 State by State Coverage Ratios using Projected Emissions from CAIR, CAMR & Pure Heat Inp 2010 State Budgets and CAIR Emissions: CAMR & Pure Heat Input Methods State CAIR 2010 Hg Emissions ( Tons) Final CAMR 2010 State Hg Budget Pure Heat Input Method 2010 State Budget State Coverage Ratio: Budget to Emission Difference ( from 0.997) Absloute Difference ( from 0.997) Coverage Ratio: Budget to Emission Difference ( from 0.997) Absloute Difference ( from 0.997)

Alabama 0.973 1.289 1.448 Alabama 1.325 0.329 0.329 1.489 0.492 0.492 Arizona 0.320 0.454 0.435 Arizona 1.420 0.423 0.423 1.360 0.363 0.363 Arkansas 0.866 0.516 0.491 Arkansas 0.596  0.401 0.401 0.567  0.430 0.430 California 0.104 0.041 0.049 California 0.393  0.604 0.604 0.469  0.528 0.528 Colorado 0.243 0.706 0.714 Colorado 2.902 1.905 1.905 2.935 1.938 1.938 Connecticut 0.036 0.053 0.063 Connecticut 1.472 0.475 0.475 1.750 0.753 0.753 Delaware 0.125 0.072 0.085 Delaware 0.578  0.419 0.419 0.682  0.315 0.315 District of Columbia    District of Columbia   0.997 0.997   0.997 0.997 Florida 0.650 1.232 1.454 Florida 1.896 0.899 0.899 2.238 1.241 1.241 Georgia 1.693 1.227 1.406 Georgia 0.725  0.272 0.272 0.831  0.166 0.166 Idaho    Idaho   0.997 0.997   0.997 0.997 Illinois 1.780 1.594 1.659 Illinois 0.896  0.101 0.101 0.932  0.065 0.065 Indiana 1.744 2.097 2.337 Indiana 1.202 0.205 0.205 1.340 0.343 0.343 Iowa 1.028 0.727 0.700 Iowa 0.707  0.290 0.290 0.681  0.316 0.316 Kansas 1.035 0.723 0.698 Kansas 0.699  0.298 0.298 0.675  0.322 0.322 Kentucky 1.151 1.525 1.806 Kentucky 1.325 0.328 0.328 1.569 0.572 0.572 Louisiana 0.405 0.601 0.457 Louisiana 1.486 0.489 0.489 1.130 0.133 0.133 Maine 0.038 0.001 0.002 Maine 0.026  0.970 0.970 0.053  0.944 0.944 Maryland 0.362 0.490 0.582 Maryland 1.352 0.355 0.355 1.606 0.609 0.609 Massachusetts 0.253 0.172 0.204 Massachusetts 0.680  0.316 0.316 0.807  0.190 0.190 Michigan 1.236 1.303 1.366 Michigan 1.054 0.057 0.057 1.105 0.108 0.108 Minnesota 0.657 0.695 0.670 Minnesota 1.058 0.061 0.061 1.020 0.023 0.023 Mississippi 0.212 0.291 0.327 Mississippi 1.375 0.378 0.378 1.545 0.548 0.548 Missouri 2.251 1.393 1.358 Missouri 0.619  0.378 0.378 0.603  0.394 0.394 Montana 0.317 0.377 0.348 Montana 1.188 0.191 0.191 1.096 0.100 0.100 Navajo Nation 0.550 0.600 0.640 Navajo Nation 1.092 0.095 0.095 1.165 0.168 0.168 Nebraska 0.548 0.421 0.401 Nebraska 0.768  0.229 0.229 0.732  0.265 0.265 Nevada 0.244 0.285 0.338 Nevada 1.167 0.170 0.170 1.384 0.387 0.387 New Hampshire 0.048 0.063 0.075 New Hampshire 1.326 0.330 0.330 1.579 0.582 0.582 New Jersey 0.404 0.153 0.181 New Jersey 0.378  0.618 0.618 0.448  0.549 0.549 New Mexico 0.394 0.299 0.285 New Mexico 0.758  0.238 0.238 0.723  0.274 0.274 New York 0.692 0.393 0.467 New York 0.568  0.429 0.429 0.675  0.322 0.322 North Carolina 1.370 1.133 1.347 North Carolina 0.827  0.170 0.170 0.983  0.014 0.014 North Dakota 0.945 1.564 0.620 North Dakota 1.655 0.658 0.658 0.656  0.341 0.341 Ohio 1.509 2.056 2.428 Ohio 1.362 0.365 0.365 1.609 0.612 0.612 Oklahoma 1.087 0.721 0.695 Oklahoma 0.663  0.334 0.334 0.639  0.357 0.357 Oregon 0.049 0.076 0.075 Oregon 1.548 0.551 0.551 1.527 0.531 0.531 Pennsylvania 3.790 1.779 2.116 Pennsylvania 0.469  0.527 0.527 0.558  0.439 0.439 Rhode Island    Rhode Island   0.997 0.997   0.997 0.997 South Carolina 0.372 0.580 0.689 South Carolina 1.560 0.563 0.563 1.853 0.856 0.856 South Dakota 0.076 0.072 0.069 South Dakota 0.944  0.053 0.053 0.904  0.093 0.093 Tennessee 0.567 0.944 1.101 Tennessee 1.665 0.668 0.668 1.942 0.945 0.945 Texas 3.233 4.656 2.776 Texas 1.440 0.443 0.443 0.859  0.138 0.138 Utah 0.195 0.506 0.602 Utah 2.598 1.601 1.601 3.090 2.093 2.093 Ute Indian Tribe 0.008 0.060 0.071 Ute Indian Tribe 7.407 6.411 6.411 8.765 7.769 7.769 Vermont    Vermont   0.997 0.997   0.997 0.997 Virginia 0.562 0.592 0.704 Virginia 1.053 0.056 0.056 1.252 0.255 0.255 Washington 0.259 0.198 0.188 Washington 0.764  0.232 0.232 0.726  0.271 0.271 West Virginia 1.694 1.394 1.658 West Virginia 0.823  0.174 0.174 0.979  0.018 0.018 Wisconsin 1.113 0.890 0.878 Wisconsin 0.800  0.197 0.197 0.789  0.208 0.208 Wyoming 0.901 0.952 0.905 Wyoming 1.057 0.060 0.060 1.005 0.008 0.008 Total 38.088 37.966 37.968 Total 0.997 6.829 29.304 0.997 10.484 32.372 Average 1.13 0.13 0.57 1.20 0.21 0.63 CAMR Hg Pure Heat Input CAIR Only Control Case Difference of State by State Hg Coverage Ratios ( BudgetBase Case Difference of State by State SO2 Coverage Ratios ( Budget: Emission) from Regionwide Perce Final CAMR Pure Heat Input Average Coverage Ratio 1.13 1.20 Average Difference 0.13 0.21 Cumulative Absolute Difference 29.30 32.37 Average Absolute Difference 0.57 0.63 Note: Alaska and Hawaii are not included in this analysis because these States are not included in our IPM modeling. ( This accounts for the difference between the total budgets presented here and the 38 ton and 15 ton CAMR caps.) 2010