[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 126 (Tuesday, July 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37312-37314]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15481]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0459; FRL-9912-39]

Pesticide Chemicals; Registration Review; Draft Human Health and
Ecological Risk Assessment; Notice of Availability.

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's draft human
health and ecological risk assessments for the registration review of
chlorfenapyr, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, flumiclorac-pentyl, maleic hydrazide,
sulfentrazone, and tebuthiuron and opens a public comment period on
these documents. Registration review is EPA's periodic review of
pesticide registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to
satisfy the statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide
can perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects
on human health or the environment. As part of the registration review
process, the Agency has completed draft human health and ecological
risk assessments, including an endangered species assessment, for all
uses of the previously listed pesticide chemicals. After reviewing
comments received during the public comment period, EPA will issue
revised risk assessments, explain any changes to the draft risk
assessments, and respond to comments and may request public input on
risk mitigation before completing proposed registration review
decisions for the previously listed pesticide chemicals. Through this
program, EPA is ensuring that each pesticide's registration is based on
current scientific and other knowledge, including its effects on human
health and the environment.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 2, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest provided in the
table in Unit III.A., by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For pesticide specific information contact: The Chemical Review
Manager identified in the table in Unit III.A. for the pesticide of
interest.
    For general questions on the registration review program, contact:
Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

 A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the Chemical Review Manager listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.

 B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or

CD-ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to
one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed
as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.

II. Authority

    EPA is conducting its registration review of chlorfenapyr,
fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, flumiclorac-pentyl, maleic hydrazide,
sulfentrazone, and tebuthiuron pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural
Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C.
Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the
registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under
FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only
if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA
section 3(c)(5). When used in accordance with widespread and commonly
recognized practice, the pesticide product must perform its intended
function without unreasonable adverse effects on the environment; that
is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the environment, or a human
dietary risk from residues that result from the use of a pesticide in
or on food.

III. Registration Reviews

 A. What action is the Agency taking?

    As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), EPA is reviewing the pesticide
registrations for chlorfenapyr, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, flumiclorac-pentyl,
maleic hydrazide, sulfentrazone, and tebuthiuron to ensure that they
continue to satisfy the FIFRA standard for registration--that is, that
these pesticides can still be used without unreasonable adverse effects
on human health or the environment.
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.53(c), EPA is providing an opportunity,
through this notice of availability, for interested parties to provide
comments and input concerning the Agency's draft human health and
ecological risk assessments for chlorfenapyr, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl,
flumiclorac-pentyl, maleic hydrazide, sulfentrazone, and tebuthiuron.
Such comments and input could address, among other things, the Agency's
risk assessment methodologies and assumptions, as applied to these
draft risk assessments. The Agency will consider all comments received
during the public comment period and make changes, as appropriate, to
the draft human health and ecological risk assessments. EPA will then
issue revised risk assessments, explain any changes to the draft risk
assessments, and respond to comments. In the Federal Register notice
announcing the availability of the revised risk assessments, if the
revised risk assessments indicate risks of concern, the Agency may
provide a comment period for the public to submit suggestions for
mitigating the risk identified in the revised risk assessments. At
present, EPA is releasing registration review draft risk assessments
for the pesticide cases identified in the following table and further
described after the table.

                                   Registration Review Draft Risk Assessments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Chemical review manager,
  Registration review case name and            Pesticide docket ID No.             telephone number, and email
                 No.                                                                         address
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chlorfenapyr (Case 7419-1)..........  EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0467.....................  Margaret Hathaway, (703) 305-
                                                                                5076,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (Case 7209)......  EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0437.....................  Molly Clayton,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Flumiclorac-pentyl (Case 7232)......  EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0084.....................  Tracy Perry,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Maleic hydrazide (Case 0381)........  EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0387.....................  Ricardo Jones,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sulfentrazone (Case 7231)...........  EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0624.....................  Christina Scheltema, (713) 308-
                                                                                2201,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Tebuthiuron (Case 0054).............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0327.....................  Joel Wolf,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Chlorfenapyr. Chlorfenapyr is an insecticide/
miticide used to control a wide range of mites and insects such as
caterpillars, centipedes, thrips, fungus gnats, ants, cockroaches,
beetles, bed bugs, silverfish, spiders, and termites. Chlorfenapyr is
registered for use on greenhouse food and non-food crops, and as an
insecticide/termiticide for use on indoor and outdoor residential
sites, food/feed handling areas, indoor and outdoor commercial sites
(including sewers), and indoor medical sites. EPA has completed a draft
human health risk assessment for all chlorfenapyr uses. In addition,
the Agency has determined that there is limited outdoor environmental
exposure from the use of chlorfenapyr and has come to a no-effect
determination for endangered species.
     Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl. Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl is an
herbicide used to control weeds on barley, cotton, rice, soybeans, and
wheat. It is also registered for non-agricultural use on conservation
reserve lands, ornamentals, rights-of-way, and turf. EPA has completed
draft human

health and ecological risk assessments, including a screening-level
listed species assessment, for all fenoxaprop-p-ethyl uses. EPA
acknowledges that further refinements to the listed species assessment
will be completed in future revisions and requests public comment on
specific areas that will reduce the uncertainties associated with the
characterization of risk to listed species identified in the current
assessment.
     Flumiclorac-pentyl. Flumiclorac-pentyl is a
post-emergence herbicide registered for use on field corn, soybeans,
cotton, and a variety of non-cropped areas. EPA has completed draft
human health and ecological risk assessments, including a screening-
level listed species assessment, for all flumiclorac-pentyl uses. EPA
acknowledges that further refinements to the listed species assessment
will be completed in future revisions and requests public comment on
specific areas that will reduce the uncertainties associated with the
characterization of risk to listed species identified in the current
assessment.
     Maleic Hydrazide. Maleic hydrazide is an
herbicide and plant growth regulator used on tobacco, potatoes, onions,
non-bearing citrus, turf, utility and highway rights-of-way, airports,
industrial land, lawns, recreational areas, ornamental shade trees and
ornamental plants. EPA has completed draft human health and ecological
risk assessments, including a screening-level listed species
assessment, for all maleic hydrazide uses. EPA acknowledges that
further refinements to the listed species assessment will be completed
in future revisions and requests public comment on specific areas that
will reduce the uncertainties associated with the characterization of
risk to listed species identified in the current assessment.
    Sulfentrazone. Sulfentrazone is an herbicide
registered for use to control a variety of broadleaf weeds on several
agricultural crops, ornamental turf/plants, residential lawns, and
recreational areas such as golf courses. EPA has completed draft human
health and ecological risk assessments, including a screening-level
listed species assessment, for all sulfentrazone uses. EPA acknowledges
that further refinements to the listed species assessment will be
completed in future revisions and requests public comment on specific
areas that will reduce the uncertainties associated with the
characterization of risk to listed species identified in the current
assessment.
    Tebuthiuron. Tebuthiuron is a systemic,
relatively non-selective herbicide used to control broadleaf and woody
weeds, grasses and brush on feed crop sites (pasture and rangeland) and
a variety of non-food crop sites. EPA has completed draft human health
and ecological risk assessments, including a screening-level listed
species assessment, for all tebuthiuron uses. EPA acknowledges that
further refinements to the listed species assessment will be completed
in future revisions and requests public comment on specific areas that
will reduce the uncertainties associated with the characterization of
risk to listed species identified in the current assessment.
    1. Other related information. Additional information on
chlorfenapyr, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, flumiclorac-pentyl, maleic hydrazide,
sulfentrazone, and tebuthiuron is available for each pesticide at
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/chemicalsearch/ and in each chemical's
individual docket listed in the table in Unit III.A. Information on the
Agency's registration review program and its implementing regulation is
available at http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.
    2. Information submission requirements. Anyone may submit data or
information in response to this document. To be considered during a
pesticide's registration review, the submitted data or information must
meet the following requirements:
     To ensure that EPA will consider data or information
submitted, interested persons must submit the data or information
during the comment period. The Agency may, at its discretion, consider
data or information submitted at a later date.
     The data or information submitted must be presented in a
legible and useable form. For example, an English translation must
accompany any material that is not in English and a written transcript
must accompany any information submitted as an audiographic or
videographic record. Written material may be submitted in paper or
electronic form.
     Submitters must clearly identify the source of any
submitted data or information.
     Submitters may request the Agency to reconsider data or
information that the Agency rejected in a previous review. However,
submitters must explain why they believe the Agency should reconsider
the data or information in the pesticide's registration review.
    As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the registration review docket for
each pesticide case will remain publicly accessible through the
duration of the registration review process; that is, until all actions
required in the final decision on the registration review case have
been completed.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests, Chlorfenapyr,
Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, Flumiclorac-pentyl, Maleic hydrazide,
Sulfentrazone, and Tebuthiuron.

    Dated: June 24, 2014.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-15481 Filed 6-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 11, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47875-47877]
[FR Doc No: 2019-19535]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2019 /
Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0057; Product Identifier 2017-SW-119-AD; Amendment
39-19729; AD 2019-18-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Leonardo S.p.A. Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Leonardo S.p.A. (Leonardo) Model AW169 helicopters. This AD
requires replacing the seals, filler wedges, and handles of each
emergency exit window. This AD was prompted by a report that a high
level of pushing force was required to jettison some windows. The
actions of this AD are intended to address an unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: This AD is effective October 16, 2019.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain document listed in this AD as of October 16,
2019.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Leonardo S.p.A. Helicopters, Matteo Ragazzi, Head of
Airworthiness, Viale G. Agusta 520, 21017 C. Costa di Samarate (Va)
Italy; telephone +39-0331-711756; fax +39-0331-229046; or at http://www.leonardocompany.com/-/bulletins. You may review a copy of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Room 6N-321, Fort
Worth, TX 76177. It is also available on the internet at http://www.regualtions.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0057.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0057; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this AD, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, any service
information that is incorporated by reference, the economic evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    On September 13, 2018, at 83 FR 46424, the Federal Register
published the FAA's notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), which
proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to
Leonardo Model AW169 helicopters, serial numbers (S/N) 69007, 69009,
69011 to 69019 inclusive, 69021 to 69024 inclusive, 69027, 69032,
69033, 69041, 69045, and 69051. The NPRM proposed to require, within 70
hours time-in-service (TIS), replacing the seals and filler wedges on
various cockpit and passenger windows and replacing certain internal
and external window straps. The NPRM also proposed to require replacing
decals on certain internal and external passenger and cockpit windows.
The proposed requirements were intended to ensure the jettisoning of
helicopter emergency exit windows, possibly affecting the evacuation of
occupants after an emergency landing.
    The NPRM was prompted by AD No. 2017-0155, dated August 23, 2017,
issued by EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of
the European Union, to correct an unsafe condition for Leonardo Model
AW169 helicopters, S/N 69007, 69009, 69011 to 69019 inclusive, 69021 to
69024 inclusive, 69027, 69032, 69033, 69041, 69045, and 69051. EASA
advises that during scheduled replacement of emergency exit window
seals on in-service Model AW189 helicopters, an ``excessively high''
level of pushing force was required to jettison some windows. Further
investigation determined that the affected windows were incorrectly
installed during manufacturing. The installation did not conform to the
approved drawings during the first installation in the production line.
According to EASA, due to the similarity in the manufacturing process,
incorrect window installation may have occurred on Model AW169
helicopters.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this AD, but did not receive any comments on the NPRM.

FAA's Determination

    These helicopters have been approved by EASA and are approved for
operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral
agreement with the European Union, EASA has notified the FAA of the
unsafe condition described in its AD. The FAA is issuing this AD
because the FAA evaluated all information provided by EASA and
determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other helicopters of the same type designs and that air
safety and the public interest require adopting the AD requirements as
proposed.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Leonardo Service Bulletin No. 169-032, Revision A,
dated September 8, 2017, which specifies replacing the seals, the non-
metallic channels, handles, and decals on the cockpit doors and cabin
emergency exit windows. This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.

Differences Between This AD and the EASA AD

    The EASA AD requires that the corrective actions occur within 70
hours TIS or 6 months. This AD requires that

the corrective actions occur within 70 hours TIS.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 1 helicopter of U.S.
Registry and that labor costs average $85 a work-hour. Based on these
estimates, the FAA expects that 24 work-hours are needed to replace the
decal, seal, filler wedges, and handle of each emergency exit window
installed in cockpit doors and the cabin. Parts cost $1,500 for a total
cost of $3,540 for this helicopter.
    According to Leonardo's service information some of the costs of
this AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact
on affected individuals. The FAA does not control warranty coverage by
Leonardo. Accordingly, the FAA has included all costs in this cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the national Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
    2. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2019-18-02 Leonardo S.p.A.: Amendment 39-19729; Docket No. FAA-2018-
0057; Product Identifier; 2017-SW-119-AD.

(a) Applicability

    This AD applies to Leonardo S.p.A. (Leonardo) Model AW169
helicopters, serial numbers 69007, 69009, 69011 through 69019, 69021
through 69024, 69027, 69032, 69033, 69041, 69045, and 69051,
certificated in any category, where the emergency exit windows have
never been removed and reinstalled.

(b) Unsafe Condition

    This AD defines the unsafe condition as failure of an emergency
window to jettison, which could prevent occupants from evacuating
the helicopter during an emergency.

(c) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective October 16, 2019.

(d) Compliance

    You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.

(e) Required Actions

    Within 70 hours time-in-service:
    (1) Replace the seals and filler wedges on the left hand (LH)
and right hand (RH) cockpit door upper windows.

    Note  1 to paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this AD: Leonardo refers
to filler wedges as ``non-metallic channels.''

    (2) Replace the seals and filler wedges on the forward LH and RH
passenger door windows. For helicopters without passenger sliding
window kit part number (P/N) 6F5630F00411, also replace the seals
and filler wedges of the aft LH and RH passenger door windows.
    (3) For helicopters with a strap P/N A487A003A, replace each
strap with emergency exit window handle P/N 8G9500L00151 on the
internal side of the window and P/N 8G9500L00251 on the external
side of the window.
    (4) Remove any decal P/N A180A005E21 from the internal side of
the passenger and cockpit windows and replace with decal P/N
A180A022E21, using as a reference Figure 1 and Figure 2 of Leonardo
Service Bulletin No. 169-032, Revision A, dated September 8, 2017
(SB No. 169-032).
    (5) Remove any decal P/N A487A003A from the external side of the
passenger and cockpit windows and replace with decals P/N
AW003DE005E33B, using as a reference Figure 3 of SB No. 169-032.

 (f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Safety Management Section, Rotorcraft Standards
Branch, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to:
Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management
Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy.,
Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, the FAA suggests
that you notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office
or certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.

(g) Additional Information

    The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD No. 2017-0155, dated August 23, 2017. You may view
the EASA AD on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov in Docket
No. FAA-2018-0057.

 (h) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 5220, Emergency
Exits.

 (i) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Leonardo Service Bulletin No. 169-032, Revision A, dated
September 8, 2017.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Leonardo S.p.A. Helicopters, Matteo Ragazzi, Head of Airworthiness,
Viale G.Agusta 520, 21017 C.Costa di Samarate (Va) Italy; telephone
+39-0331-711756; fax +39-0331-229046; or at http://www.leonardocompany.com/-/bulletins.
    (4) You may review the referenced service information at the
FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (817) 222-
5110.

    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on September 4, 2019.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-19535 Filed 9-10-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10359]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4085]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EL11-22-000, QF11-115-001, QF11-116-001, et al.]

OREG 1, Inc., OREG 2, Inc., OREG 3, Inc., OREG 4, Inc.; Notice of
Petition for Declaratory Order

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OREG 1, Inc...........................................       EL11-22-000
OREG 2, Inc...........................................      QF11-115-001
OREG 3, Inc...........................................      QF11-116-001
OREG 4, Inc...........................................      QF11-117-001
                                                            QF11-118-001
                                                            QF11-119-001
                                                            QF11-120-001
                                                            QF11-121-001
                                                            QF11-122-001
                                                            QF11-123-001
                                                            QF11-124-001
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that on February 14, 2011, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2)
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(2) (2010), OREG 1, Inc., OREG
2, Inc., OREG 3, Inc., and OREG 4, Inc., filed a Petition for
Declaratory Order (Petition) requesting that the Commission grant their
request for limited waivers from the filing requirements applicable to
small power production facilities set forth in section 292.203(a)(3) of
the Commission's Regulation's, 18 CFR 292.203(a)(3) (2010).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 16, 2011.

    Dated: February 16, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-4085 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: November 17, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 222)]
[Notices]
[Page 67865-67866]
[DOCID:fr17no08-60]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. TX09-1-000]

Powerex Corp.; Notice of Filing

November 10, 2008.
    Take notice that on November 5, 2008, Powerex Corp. (Powerex) filed
an application for an Order, requesting that the Commission require
Nevada Power Company (Nevada Power) to provide transmission serve to
Powerex, pursuant to section 211 of the Federal Power Act and section
5.2 of Nevada Power's Open Access Transmission Tariff.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on December 5, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-27172 Filed 11-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 19, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46865-46866]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16960]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R08-OAR-2016-0221; FRL-9948-88-Region 8]

Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan Revisions
to Permits, Rules and Approval Orders; Utah

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the
State of Utah on February 10, 2012 and August 29, 2014. These
submittals request SIP revisions to remove changes to the major source
baseline date that were disapproved by the EPA on July 15, 2011. The
submittals also address the EPA's February 6, 2014 disapproval of
several permit rules related to the public availability of good
engineering practice stack height demonstrations in the public comment
process for an approval order, and the process for making emission
reductions enforceable in an approval order. The EPA is taking this
action in accordance with section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 18, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
OAR-2016-0221, at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.,) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody Ostendorf, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the Utah rules

described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA
has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally
available through www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region 8 Office
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register,
the EPA is approving the State's SIP revision as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the agency views this as a
noncontroversial SIP revision and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the preamble to the
direct final rule.
    If the EPA receives no adverse comments, the EPA will not take
further action on this proposed rule. If the EPA receives adverse
comments, the EPA will withdraw the direct final rule and it will not
take effect. The EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent
final rule based on this proposed rule.
    The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. For
further information, please see the ADDRESSES section of this notice.
    Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on a distinct
provision of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final those provisions of
the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. See the
information provided in the Direct Final action of the same title which
is located in the Rules and Regulations Section of this Federal
Register.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: June 22, 2016.
Shaun L. McGrath,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2016-16960 Filed 7-18-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17120-17121]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7149]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Supplemental Notice Requesting Comments

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority Rights to New Participant-Funded   AD11-11-000
 Transmission.
Alta Wind I, LLC..........................  EL10-62-000
Alta Wind II, LLC.........................
Alta Wind III, LLC........................
Alta Wind IV, LLC.........................
Alta Wind V, LLC..........................
Alta Wind VI, LLC.........................
Alta Wind VII, LLC........................
Alta Wind VIII, LLC.......................
Alta Windpower Development, LLC...........
TGP Development Company, LLC..............
Puget Sound Energy, Inc...................  EL10-72-001
Terra-Gen Dixie Valley, LLC, TGP Dixie      EL10-29-002
 Development Company, LLC, and New York
 Canyon, LLC.
Green Borders Geothermal, LLC v. Terra-Gen  EL10-36-002
 Dixie Valley, LLC.
Terra-Gen Dixie Valley, LLC...............  ER11-2127-001
Northern Pass Transmission, LLC...........  ER11-2377-000
Cedar Creek Wind Energy, LLC..............  RC11-1-000
Milford Wind Corridor Phase I, LLC........  RC11-2-000
SunZia Transmission, LLC..................  EL11-24-000
Hudson Transmission Partners, LLC.........  ER11-3017-000
Peetz Logan Interconnect, LLC.............  ER11-2970-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 15, 2011, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff
(Staff) held a technical conference to obtain further information to
aid the Commission in considering issues related to the ownership of
and priority access rights to new participant-funded transmission
projects.
    In particular, Staff sought to explore issues related to priority
rights to use transmission infrastructure developed under various new
business models in two specific contexts: independent and/or merchant
transmission, and generator lead lines. In both contexts, participants
were encouraged to identify and discuss the appropriate balance between
the Commission's requirements for open access and the needs of project
developers. Participants were also encouraged to propose and discuss
specific regulatory alternatives that are consistent with the
Commission's open access policies and its statutory responsibility to
ensure that rates, terms, and conditions of service are just and
reasonable and not unduly discriminatory or preferential.
    Persons wishing to comment on these issues should submit written
comments to the Commission no later than April 21, 2011.

    Dated: March 18, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-7149 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on November 8, 2005

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2004-17867

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  AEROTRANSPORTE de CARGA UNION, S.A. de C.V.  		       Date
Filed: September 22, 2005

Relief requested:  Renewal of exemption from 49 USC § 41301 to permit
the applicant to conduct scheduled foreign air transportation of
property and mail between Guadalajara, Mexico, and Los Angeles,
California.

If renewal, date and citation of last action:  October 8, 2004, in this
Docket.

Applicant representative:  Pierre Murphy,<PHONE_NUMBER>    DOT analyst:
Robert J. Finamore,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  None.

	DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved.
         Action date:  November 8, 2005

Effective dates of authority granted:  November 8, 2005, through
November 8, 2006.

Basis for approval (bilateral agreement/reciprocity):  United
States-Mexico Air Transport Services Agreement.

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the
terms, conditions, and limitations of our standard exemption conditions
(attached).

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director, Office of International
Aviation

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) the applicant was qualified to perform its proposed
operations; (3) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (4) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted/deferred/dismissed, we denied all requests in
the referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

FOREIGN CARRIER EXEMPTION CONDITIONS
                              ATTACHMENT

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the foreign carrier
applicant(s) shall:

1) Not conduct any operations unless it holds a currently effective
authorization from its homeland for such operations, and it has filed a
copy of such authorization with the Department;

2) Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, including, but not limited to, 14 CFR Parts 129, 91, and
36, and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning
security, including, but not limited to, 49 CFR Part 1546 or 1550, as
applicable.  To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government
requirements concerning security, the holder shall, before commencing
any new service (including charter flights) from a foreign airport that
would be the holder’s last point of departure for the United States,
contact its International Principal Security Inspector (IPSI) to advise
the IPSI of its plans and to find out whether the Transportation
Security Administration has determined that security is adequate to
allow such airport(s) to be served;

3) Comply with the requirements for minimum insurance coverage contained
in 14 CFR Part 205, and, prior to the commencement of any operations
under this authority, file evidence of such coverage, in the form of a
completed OST Form 6411, with the Federal Aviation Administration’s
Program Management Branch (AFS-260), Flight Standards Service (any
changes to, or termination of, insurance also shall be filed with that
office);

4) Not operate aircraft under this authority unless it complies with
operational safety requirements at least equivalent to Annex 6 of the
Chicago Convention;

5) Conform to the airworthiness and airman competency requirements of
its Government for international air services;

6) Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 203,
concerning waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

7) Agree that operations under this authority constitute a waiver of
sovereign immunity, for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1605(a), but only with
respect to those actions or proceedings instituted against it in any
court or other tribunal in the United States that are: a) based on its
operations in international air transportation that, according to the
contract of carriage, include a point in the United States as a point of
origin, point of destination, or agreed stopping place, or for which the
contract of carriage was purchased in the United States; or b) based on
a claim under any international agreement or treaty cognizable in any
court or other tribunal of the United States.  In this condition, the
term “international air transportation” means “international
transportation” as defined by the Warsaw Convention, except that all
States shall be considered to be High Contracting Parties for the
purpose of this definition;

8) Except as specifically authorized by the Department, originate or
terminate all flights to/from the United States in its homeland;

9) Comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 217, concerning the
reporting of scheduled, nonscheduled, and charter data;

10) If charter operations are authorized, except as otherwise provided
in the applicable aviation agreement, comply with the Department’s
rules governing charters (including 14 CFR Parts 212 and 380); and

11) Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and limitations
required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the Department,
with all applicable orders or regulations of other U.S. agencies and
courts, and with all applicable laws of the United States.

This authority shall not be effective during any period when the holder
is not in compliance with the conditions imposed above.  Moreover, this
authority cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without explicit
Department approval under Title 49 of the U.S. Code.

 05/2004