[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 67 (Monday, April 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20969-20971]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08095]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-69273; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2013-30]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Proposing To Establish
the NYSE MKT Trades Digital Media Data Feed and a Schedule of the NYSE
MKT Equities Proprietary Market Data Fees

April 2, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on March 21, 2013, NYSE MKT LLC (the ``Exchange'' or ``NYSE
MKT'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to establish the NYSE MKT Trades Digital
Media data feed and a schedule of the NYSE MKT Equities Proprietary
Market Data Fees. The text of the proposed rule change is available on
the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to establish the NYSE MKT Trades Digital
Media data feed and a Market Data Fee Schedule.
Background
    In 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or the
``Commission'') approved the NYSE MKT Trades data feed and certain fees
for it.\4\ NYSE MKT Trades is a NYSE MKT-only market data feed that
allows a vendor to redistribute on a real-time basis the same last sale
information that the Exchange reports under the Consolidated Tape
Association (``CTA'') Plan for inclusion in the CTA Plan's consolidated
data streams and certain other related data elements. Specifically,
NYSE MKT Trades includes the real-time last sale price, time, size, and
bid/ask quotations for each security traded on the Exchange and a stock
summary message. The stock summary message updates every minute and
includes NYSE MKT's opening price, high price, low price, closing
price, and cumulative volume for the security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62187 (May 27,
2010), 75 FR 31500 (June 3, 2010) (SR-NYSEAmex-2010-35).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange currently charges NYSE MKT Trades data feed recipients
an access fee of $750 per month, and a subscriber fee for professional
subscribers of $10 per month per device, which may be counted, at the
election of the vendor based on the number of ``Subscriber
Entitlements'' \5\ (collectively, these fees are referred to in this
filing as ``NYSE MKT Trades basic fees''). In July 2012, the Exchange
added a fee for distribution by television broadcasters (``Broadcast
Fee''), which is $5,000 per month.\6\ The television broadcast
distribution method differs from the other distribution methods in that
the data is available in a temporary, view-only mode on television
screens. NYSE MKT Trades is not offered in a manner to facilitate its
distribution via Web sites or mobile devices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See id. at 31501.
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67438 (July 13,
2012), 77 FR 42535 (July 19, 2012) (SR-NYSEMKT-2012-19).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Change
    The Exchange proposes to offer a new version of NYSE MKT Trades
called ``NYSE MKT Trades Digital Media,'' which will include, as with
NYSE MKT Trades as currently offered, access to the real-time last sale
price, time, and size for each security traded on the Exchange as well
as the stock summary message. NYSE MKT Trades Digital Media will not,
however, include access to the bid/ask quotation that is included with
the current NYSE MKT Trades product under the NYSE MKT Trades basic
fees and Broadcast Fee. NYSE MKT Trades will be offered in a new manner
that will permit market data vendors, television broadcasters, Web site
and mobile device service providers, and others to distribute this data
product to their customers for viewing via television, Web site, and
mobile devices. Vendors will not be permitted to provide NYSE MKT
Trades Digital Media in a context in which a trading or order routing
decision can be implemented unless CTA data is available in an
equivalent manner, must label the products as NYSE MKT-only data, and
must provide a hyperlinked notice similar to the one provided for CTA
delayed data.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ These are requirements that currently apply to NYSE MKT
Realtime Reference Prices (``NYSE MKT RRP''), a separate last sale
product that also is offered for use in a non-trading environment.
See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 61144 (Dec. 10, 2009), 74
FR 67275, 67276-77 (Dec. 18, 2009) (SR-NYSEAmex-2009-85); 61403
(Jan. 22, 2010), 75 FR 4598 (Jan. 28, 2010) (SR-NYSEAmex-2009-85).
The Exchange also intends to offer NYSE MKT RRP in the future as
NYSE MKT RRP Digital Media, but there will be no substantive change
to the NYSE MKT RRP product elements, only the permitted
distribution channels. The Exchange will propose pricing for NYSE
MKT Trades Digital Media and NYSE MKT RRP Digital Media in a
separate filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to establish a Market Data Fee Schedule.
The market data fees on the proposed Market Data Fee Schedule for NYSE
MKT BBO,\8\ NYSE MKT Trades,\9\ NYSE MKT RRP,\10\ and NYSE MKT Order
Imbalances \11\ have been previously filed with the Commission. The
Exchange is proposing the Market Data Fee Schedule in order to provide
greater transparency to its customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See supra note 4.
    \9\ See supra notes 4, 6.
    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61403 (Jan. 22,
2010), 75 FR 4598 (Jan. 28, 2010) (SR-NYSEAmex-2009-85).
    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60385 (July 24,
2009), 74 FR 38249 (July 31, 2009) (NYSEAmex-2009-26).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) \12\ of
the Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
\13\ of the Act, in particular, in that it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and

equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest, and it is not designed to permit
unfair discrimination among customers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is offering the NYSE MKT Trades Digital Media data
product in recognition of the demand for a more seamless and easier-to-
administer data distribution model that takes into account the expanded
variety of media and communication devices that investors utilize
today. For example, a television broadcaster could display the NYSE MKT
Trades Digital Media data during market-related television programming
and on its Web site and allow its viewers to view the data via their
mobile devices, creating a more seamless distribution model that will
allow investors more choice in how they receive and view market data.
Because the product is intended for use in a non-trading environment,
the Exchange will not include a bid/ask quotation as a product element.
Market participants that still wish to obtain bid/ask quotations can do
so by paying the NYSE MKT Trades basic fees. The Exchange believes that
establishing the Market Data Fee Schedule will provide greater
transparency for the Exchange's customers.
    In adopting Regulation NMS, the Commission granted self-regulatory
organizations and broker-dealers increased authority and flexibility to
offer new and unique market data to consumers of such data. It was
believed that this authority would expand the amount of data available
to users and consumers of such data and also spur innovation and
competition for the provision of market data. The Exchange believes
that the data products proposed herein are precisely the sort of market
data products that the Commission envisioned when it adopted Regulation
NMS. The Commission concluded that Regulation NMS--by lessening
regulation of the market in proprietary data--would itself further the
Act's goals of facilitating efficiency and competition:

    [E]fficiency is promoted when broker-dealers who do not need the
data beyond the prices, sizes, market center identifications of the
NBBO and consolidated last sale information are not required to
receive (and pay for) such data. The Commission also believes that
efficiency is promoted when broker-dealers may choose to receive
(and pay for) additional market data based on their own internal
analysis of the need for such data.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496 (June 29, 2005).

    By removing ``unnecessary regulatory restrictions'' on the ability
of exchanges to sell their own data, Regulation NMS advanced the goals
of the Act and the principles reflected in its legislative history.
    The Exchange further notes that the existence of alternatives to
the Exchange's products, including real-time consolidated data, free
delayed consolidated data, and proprietary data from other sources,
ensures that the Exchange is not unreasonably discriminatory because
vendors and subscribers can elect these alternatives.
    The proposed data product will remove impediments to and help
perfect a free and open market by permitting the Exchange's last sale
data to be more widely distributed, thereby benefiting users of the
data. In addition, the proposal would not permit unfair discrimination
because the product will be available to all of the Exchange's vendors
and customers on an equivalent basis.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The market for proprietary
data products is currently competitive and inherently contestable
because there is fierce competition for the inputs necessary to the
creation of proprietary data. Numerous exchanges compete with each
other for listings, trades, and market data itself, providing virtually
limitless opportunities for entrepreneurs who wish to produce and
distribute their own market data. This proprietary data is produced by
each individual exchange, as well as other entities (such as
internalizing broker-dealers and various forms of alternative trading
systems, including dark pools and electronic communication networks),
in a vigorously competitive market. It is common for market
participants to further and exploit this competition by sending their
order flow and transaction reports to multiple markets, rather than
providing them all to a single market.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change: (1) Does not
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition;
and (3) by its terms does not become operative for 30 days after the
date of this filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \15\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under 19b-4(f)(6) normally may not
become operative prior to 30 days after the date of filing.\17\
However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \18\ permits the Commission to designate
a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The Exchange has requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative delay. The Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change will make the Exchange's last sale data more
widely available through more distribution channels, which will enable
investors to better monitor trading activity on the Exchange, and
thereby serve the public interest. The Exchange also notes that other
exchanges already offer similar products, and thus believes that the
Exchange's proposed products will enhance competition. The Exchange
believes that expanding distribution channels and offering a new
version of the product for use in a non-trading environment will
benefit investors. The Commission believes that permitting the Exchange
to offer this product without delay is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission

designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
    \18\ Id.
    \19\ For the purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative
delay, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2013-30 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2013-30. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2013-30 and should
be submitted on or before April 29, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-08095 Filed 4-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18673-18674]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07209]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. IC-32051]

Notice of Applications for Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940

March 25, 2016.
    The following is a notice of applications for deregistration under
section 8(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for the month of
March 2016. A copy of each application may be obtained via the
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. An order granting each
application will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing on any application by writing to the
SEC's Secretary at the address below and serving the relevant applicant
with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on April 19, 2016, and
should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in the form of
an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to
Rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the nature of the
writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing
on the matter, the reason for the request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification
by writing to the Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: The Commission: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Shin, Attorney-Adviser, at
(202) 551-5921 or Chief Counsel's Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>; SEC,
Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-8010.

Curian Series Trust [File No. 811-22495]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On December 10, 2015, January 21, 2016, and
February 2, 2016, applicant made liquidating distributions to its
shareholders, based on net asset value. Expenses of $172,315 incurred
in connection with the liquidation were paid by applicant's investment
adviser.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on February 26, 2016.
    Applicant's Address: 7601 Technology Way, Denver, Colorado 80237.

ALTMFX Trust [File No. 811-22989]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On December 3, 2015 and December 29, 2015,
applicant made liquidating distributions to its shareholders, based on
net asset value. Expenses of approximately $31,641 incurred in
connection with the liquidation were paid by applicant, applicant's
custodian, and applicant's administrator.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on February 29, 2016.
    Applicant's Address: Three Canal Plaza, Suite 600, Portland, Maine
04101.

Lazard Alternative Emerging Markets 1099 Fund [File No. 811-22590]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On December
31, 2015, applicant transferred its remaining assets and known
liabilities to a liquidating trust, based on net asset value. Each
shareholder of applicant has received a pro rata interest in the
liquidating trust. Expenses of approximately $125,000 incurred in
connection with the liquidation were paid by applicant's investment
adviser.

    Filing Date: The application was filed on March 1, 2016.
    Applicant's Address: 30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, New York
10112.

Laudus Institutional Trust [File No. 811-08759]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. Each series of applicant has transferred its
assets to a corresponding series of Laudus Trust and, on February 6,
2015, made a final distribution to its shareholders based on net asset
value. Expenses of approximately $89,296 incurred in connection with
the reorganization were paid by applicant and the acquiring fund.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on March 1, 2016.
    Applicant's Address: 211 Main Street, San Francisco, California
94105.

 Meeder Premier Portfolios [File No. 811-21424]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On October 31, 2006, applicant made a
liquidating distribution to its shareholders, based on net asset value.
Expenses of $84,989 incurred in connection with the liquidation were
paid by applicant.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on February 1, 2016, and
amended on March 1, 2016 and March 9, 2016.
    Applicant's Address: 6125 Memorial Drive, Dublin, Ohio 43017.

Tea Leaf Management Investment Trust [File No. 811-22737]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On January 29, 2016, applicant made a
liquidating distribution to its shareholders, based on net asset value.
Expenses of $5,850 incurred in connection with the liquidation were
paid by applicant's investment adviser.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on March 7, 2016 and
amended on March 15, 2016.
    Applicant's Address: 370 Lexington Avenue, Suite 201, New York, New
York 10017.

Cottonwood Mutual Funds [File No. 811-22602]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. Applicant transferred its assets to a
corresponding series of World Funds Trust and, on February 8, 2016,
made a final distribution to its shareholders based on net asset value.
Expenses of approximately $10,000 incurred in connection with the
reorganization were paid by applicant's investment adviser.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on March 11, 2016.
    Applicant's Address: 225 West Washington Street, 21st Floor,
Chicago, Illinois 60606.

Meyers Capital Investments Trust [File No. 811-22180]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On February 29, 2016, applicant made a
liquidating distribution to its shareholders, based on net asset value.
Expenses of $2,750 incurred in connection with the liquidation were
paid by applicant's investment adviser.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on March 18, 2016.
    Applicant's Address: 2695 Sandover Road, Columbus, Ohio 43220.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-07209 Filed 3-30-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14681-14686]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5864]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0318; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-033-AD;
Amendment 39-16966; AD 2012-04-10]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Burl A. Rogers (Type Certificate
Previously Held by William Brad Mitchell and Aeronca, Inc.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Burl A. Rogers (type certificate previously held by William Brad
Mitchell and Aeronca, Inc.) Models 15AC and S15AC airplanes. This AD
was prompted by reports of intergranular exfoliation and corrosion of
the upper and/or lower wing main spar cap angles found on the affected
airplanes. This AD requires repetitive inspections of the upper and
lower main wing spar cap angles for cracks and/or corrosion and
installing inspection access panels. This AD also requires replacing
the wing spar cap angles if moderate or severe corrosion is found and
applying corrosion inhibitor. We are issuing this AD to correct the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective April 17, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of April 17,
2012.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Burl's Aircraft, LLC, P.O. Box 671487, Chugiak, Alaska 99567-1487;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet: http://www.burlac.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane

Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816)
329-4148.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: August Asay, Supervisory Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Anchorage Aircraft Certification Office, 222 W. 7th
Ave., 14, Anchorage, Alaska 99513; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM published in the Federal Register on April 4, 2011 (76 FR
18454). That NPRM proposed to require repetitive inspections of the
upper and lower main wing spar cap angles for cracks and/or corrosion
and installing inspection access panels. That NPRM also proposed to
require replacing the wing spar cap angles if moderate or severe
corrosion is found and applying corrosion inhibitor.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
(76 FR 18454, April 4, 2011) and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Extend Comment Period

    The Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA), John Poulter, Andrew
Cooper Crow, Eric Sandberg, Rodney David Pollard, Kyle W. Boatright,
and 10 other commenters requested an extension of the comment period.
    The commenters stated that additional time was needed to receive
all of the data requested through the Freedom of Information Act and to
prepare a request for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC).
    We do not agree to extend the comment period again. We issued the
proposed AD (76 FR 18454, April 4, 2011) with a 45-day open comment
period. Due to several public comments received at that time requesting
an extension of the comment period to facilitate fact finding/
information gathering, we issued an extension of the comment period (76
FR 23920, April 29, 2011) that extended the comment period for an
additional 45 days. Even though we did not extend the comment period
any further, we have accepted all comments to the docket that were
received after the comment close date.
    We have determined it is in the best interest of the public to go
forward with this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
airplanes. The public may always propose AMOCs to show compliance to
the requirements cited in the AD. We will review and consider all AMOC
requests we receive provided they follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19
and this AD.
    We made no change to the AD based on this comment.

Request To Use Different Inspection Method

    John Poulter, Kyle W. Boatright, Douglas T. Rounds, Frank Charles,
Gerald Wayne Cox, John Landers, Ron Craig Cooper, and four other
commenters requested approval to use the borescope inspection method.
    The commenters stated that using a borescope when inspecting the
main spar cap angles on the wings for corrosion would save time and the
expense of installing access covers in the wings.
    We agree that a borescope inspection could provide an acceptable
level of safety for doing the required inspection; however, we disagree
with approving it for this AD because we do not have written detailed
guidance for doing a borescope inspection that we can refer to in this
AD at this time.
    The public may always propose AMOCs to show compliance to the
requirements cited in the AD. We will review and consider all AMOC
requests we receive provided they follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19
and this AD.
    We made no change to the AD based on this comment.

Request To Change the Costs of Compliance Section

    An anonymous commenter stated that the Costs of Compliance section
should be re-evaluated.
    The commenter stated that the estimated cost information in the
proposed AD (76 FR 18454, April 4, 2011) is misleading since some of
the information is presented per wing instead of per airplane. The
commenter also stated that the estimated cost of replacing the main
spar cap on both wings could exceed the value of the airplane, and the
estimated cost to inspect and install inspection panels could easily
amount to 10 to 25 percent of the value of the airplane.
    The commenter stated that there are less costly, yet as effective,
options to comply with the AD, and we should include those costs in the
AD.
    We do not agree with the commenter. We determined that the
estimated costs stated in the proposed AD (76 FR 18454, April 4, 2011)
represent the most accurate estimate we can make at this time. Total
fleet repair costs were not calculated because we have no way of
determining the number of wings that will be found to be corroded and/
or cracked that will need to be replaced.
    The public may always propose AMOCs to show compliance to the
requirements cited in the AD. The FAA will review and consider all AMOC
requests we receive provided they follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19
and this AD.
    We made no change to the AD based on this comment.

Request To Incorporate Revised Service Information

    Burl's Aircraft, LLC issued additional installation instructions
for installing the 2-1272 reinforcement doubler and the 2-1285
inspection cover assemblies. We infer that Burl's Aircraft, LLC wants
the FAA to include the installation instructions into the final rule AD
action.
    We agree. We have revised the final rule AD action to incorporate
using the installation instructions.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the change described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (76 FR 18454, April 4, 2011) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (76 FR 18454, April 4, 2011).
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic

burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 255 airplanes in the U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
              Action                      Labor cost              Parts cost          product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial inspection...............  10 work-hours x $85 per   Not applicable.....            $850        $216,750
                                    hour = $850.
Installation of inspection access  30 work-hours x $85 per   $630...............           3,180         810,900
 panels and inspection.             hour = $2,550.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that will be required based on the results of the inspections. We have
no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these
replacements:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                Action                            Labor cost                  Parts cost           product  per
                                                                                wing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement of main spar cap..........  80 work-hours x $85 per hour   $1,200 per wing.........          $8,000
                                         = $6,800 per wing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2012-04-10 Burl A. Rogers (Type Certificate Previously Held by
William Brad Mitchell and Aeronca, Inc.) Models 15AC and S15AC
Airplanes: Amendment 39-16966; Docket No. FAA-2011-0318; Directorate
Identifier 2010-CE-033-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective April 17, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Burl A. Rogers (type certificate previously
held by William Brad Mitchell and Aeronca, Inc.) Model 15AC and
S15AC airplanes, all serial numbers, that are certificated in any
category.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of intergranular exfoliation and
corrosion of the upper and/or lower wing main spar cap angles found
on the affected airplanes. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct cracks and corrosion in the wing main spar cap angles, which
could result in reduced strength of the wing spar and the load
carrying capacity of the wing. This could lead to wing failure and
consequent loss of control.

(f) Actions, Compliance, and Procedures

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done (does not eliminate the repetitive actions of
this AD).

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 When must it be
     What must be done?               done?         How must it be done?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Inspect the exposed       (i) Within the next   Follow Burl's
 trailing edges of both the    25 hours time-in-     Aircraft, LLC
 upper and lower main spar     service (TIS) after   Mandatory Service
 cap angles on both the left   April 17, 2012 (the   Bulletin No. 15AC06-
 and right wing for signs of   effective date of     08-10, dated June
 cracks, intergranular         this AD) or within    8, 2010; Burl's
 exfoliation, and corrosion.   the next 6 months     Aircraft, LLC
                               after April 17,       Mandatory Service
                               2012 (the effective   Bulletin No. 15AC06-
                               date of this AD),     08-10, Amendment A,
                               whichever occurs      dated June 23,
                               first; or             2010; or Burl's
                              (ii) If the left and/  Aircraft, LLC
                               or right wing have    Mandatory Service
                               been repaired and     Bulletin No. 15AC06-
                               both the upper and    08-10, Amendment B,
                               lower main spar       dated June 23,
                               caps have been        2010, Rev.
                               replaced using new    Original, September
                               parts: Inspect at     15, 2011; and FAA
                               or before the next    Advisory Circular
                               annual inspection     (AC) 43.13-1B,
                               that occurs 10        Change 1, Chapter
                               years after the       6. AC 43.13-1B can
                               replacement or        be found at http://
                               within the next 100   rgl.faa.gov/.
                               hours TIS after
                               April 17, 2012 (the
                               effective date of
                               this AD), whichever
                               occurs later. This
                               compliance time
                               applies separately
                               to each wing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) After completing the      (i) Within 12 months  Follow Burl's
 inspection required in        after April 17,       Aircraft, LLC
 paragraph (f)(1) of this      2012 (the effective   Mandatory Service
 AD, install new inspection    date of this AD);     Bulletin No. 15AC06-
 hole skin reinforcement       or                    08-10, dated June
 doublers and the associated  (ii) If the left and/  8, 2010, which
 screw cover plate in both     or right wing have    includes Burl's
 the left and right wing.      been repaired and     Aircraft, LLC
                               both the upper and    Drawing No. SB
                               lower main spar       15AC06-08-10 (not
                               caps have been        dated); Burl's
                               replaced using new    Aircraft, LLC
                               parts: At or before   Mandatory Service
                               the next annual       Bulletin No. 15AC06-
                               inspection that       08-10, Amendment A,
                               occurs 10 years       dated June 23,
                               after the             2010; or Burl's
                               replacement or        Aircraft, LLC
                               within the next 100   Mandatory Service
                               hours TIS after       Bulletin No. 15AC06-
                               April 17, 2012 (the   08-10, Amendment B,
                               effective date of     dated June 23,
                               this AD), whichever   2010, Rev.
                               occurs later. This    Original, September
                               compliance time       15, 2011, which
                               applies separately    references Burl's
                               to each wing.         Aircraft, LLC
                                                     Installation
                                                     Instruction No. SB
                                                     15AC06-08-10, dated
                                                     September 9, 2011,
                                                     Burl's Aircraft,
                                                     LLC Sketch No. SB
                                                     15AC06-08-10, dated
                                                     September 9, 2011,
                                                     and Burl's
                                                     Aircraft, LLC
                                                     Drawing No. 2-1272
                                                     Splice, dated
                                                     September 6, 2011;
                                                     and FAA Advisory
                                                     Circular (AC) 43.13-
                                                     1B, Change 1,
                                                     Chapter 6. AC 43.13-
                                                     1B can be found at
                                                     http://rgl.faa.gov/
                                                     .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) After completing the      Before further        Follow Burl's
 inspection required in        flight after          Aircraft, LLC
 paragraph (f)(1) of this AD   installing the        Mandatory Service
 and installing the new        inspection hole       Bulletin No. 15AC06-
 inspection hole skin          skin reinforcement    08-10, dated June
 reinforcement doublers in     doublers as           8, 2010; Burl's
 the left and right wing as    required in           Aircraft, LLC
 required in paragraph         paragraph (f)(2) of   Mandatory Service
 (f)(2) of this AD, through    this AD.              Bulletin No. 15AC06-
 the inspection access                               08-10, Amendment A,
 panels, inspect the leading                         dated June 23,
 and trailing edges of both                          2010; or Burl's
 the upper and lower main                            Aircraft, LLC
 spar cap angles on both the                         Mandatory Service
 left and right wing for                             Bulletin No. 15AC06-
 signs of cracks,                                    08-10, Amendment B,
 intergranular exfoliation                           dated June 23,
 and corrosion.                                      2010, Rev.
                                                     Original, September
                                                     15, 2011.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Remove any light          Before further        Follow Burl's
 corrosion found during the    flight after the      Aircraft, LLC
 inspection required in        inspection required   Mandatory Service
 paragraph (f)(3) of this AD   in paragraph (f)(3)   Bulletin No. 15AC06-
 and treat the entirety of     of this AD.           08-10, dated June
 both the upper and lower                            8, 2010; Burl's
 main spar cap angles on                             Aircraft, LLC
 both the left and right                             Mandatory Service
 wing with corrosion                                 Bulletin No. 15AC06-
 inhibitor.                                          08-10, Amendment A,
                                                     dated June 23,
                                                     2010; or Burl's
                                                     Aircraft, LLC
                                                     Mandatory Service
                                                     Bulletin No. 15AC06-
                                                     08-10, Amendment B,
                                                     dated June 23,
                                                     2010, Rev.
                                                     Original, September
                                                     15, 2011.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) If cracks, intergranular  Before further        Follow Burl's
 exfoliation, or moderate or   flight after the      Aircraft, LLC
 severe corrosion is found     inspection required   Mandatory Service
 during the inspection         in paragraphs         Bulletin No. 15AC06-
 required in paragraphs        (f)(1) and (f)(3)     08-10, dated June
 (f)(1) or (f)(3) of this      of this AD.           8, 2010; Burl's
 AD, replace the affected                            Aircraft, LLC
 main spar cap angles in                             Mandatory Service
 their entirety as a single                          Bulletin No. 15AC06-
 piece. Splicing of the main                         08-10, Amendment A,
 spar cap angles is not                              dated June 23,
 permitted.                                          2010; or Burl's
                                                     Aircraft, LLC
                                                     Mandatory Service
                                                     Bulletin No. 15AC06-
                                                     08-10, Amendment B,
                                                     dated June 23,
                                                     2010, Rev.
                                                     Original, September
                                                     15, 2011; and
                                                     contact Burl's
                                                     Aircraft, LLC in
                                                     paragraph (i) of
                                                     this AD for a
                                                     replacement scheme
                                                     and incorporate the
                                                     replacement scheme.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(6) Removing the wing         Repetitively          Follow Burl's
 inspection access panels,     thereafter at         Aircraft, LLC
 repetitively inspect both     intervals not to      Mandatory Service
 the upper and lower forward   exceed every 12       Bulletin No. 15AC06-
 main spar caps on both the    months after the      08-10, dated June
 left and right wing for       inspection required   8, 2010; Burl's
 signs of cracks,              in paragraph (f)(3)   Aircraft, LLC
 intergranular exfoliation,    of this AD.           Mandatory Service
 and corrosion.                                      Bulletin No. 15AC06-
                                                     08-10, Amendment A,
                                                     dated June 23,
                                                     2010; or Burl's
                                                     Aircraft, LLC
                                                     Mandatory Service
                                                     Bulletin No. 15AC06-
                                                     08-10, Amendment B,
                                                     dated June 23,
                                                     2010, Rev.
                                                     Original, September
                                                     15, 2011; and FAA
                                                     Advisory Circular
                                                     (AC) 43.13-1B,
                                                     Change 1, Chapter
                                                     6. AC 43.13-1B can
                                                     be found at http://rgl.faa.gov/.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(7) After each inspection     Before further        Follow Burl's
 required in paragraph         flight after each     Aircraft, LLC
 (f)(6) of this AD, if only    inspection required   Mandatory Service
 light corrosion is found,     in paragraph (f)(6)   Bulletin No. 15AC06-
 remove the corrosion and      of this AD.           08-10, dated June
 treat the main spar cap       Continue with the     8, 2010; Burl's
 angles with corrosion         repetitive            Aircraft, LLC
 inhibitor.                    inspections           Mandatory Service
                               required in           Bulletin No. 15AC06-
                               paragraph (f)(6) of   08-10, Amendment A,
                               this AD.              dated June 23,
                                                     2010; or Burl's
                                                     Aircraft, LLC
                                                     Mandatory Service
                                                     Bulletin No. 15AC06-
                                                     08-10, Amendment B,
                                                     dated June 23,
                                                     2010, Rev.
                                                     Original, September
                                                     15, 2011; and FAA
                                                     Advisory Circular
                                                     (AC) 43.13-1B,
                                                     Change 1, Chapter
                                                     6. AC 43.13-1B can
                                                     be found at http://rgl.faa.gov/.
                                                     Contact Burl's
                                                     Aircraft, LLC in
                                                     paragraph (i) of
                                                     this AD for a
                                                     replacement scheme
                                                     and incorporate the
                                                     replacement scheme.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(8) After each inspection     Before further        Follow Burl's
 required in paragraph         flight after each     Aircraft, LLC
 (f)(6) of this AD, if         inspection required   Mandatory Service
 cracks, intergranular         in paragraph (f)(6)   Bulletin No. 15AC06-
 exfoliation, or moderate or   of this AD.           08-10, dated June
 severe corrosion is found,    Continue with the     8, 2010; Burl's
 replace the affected main     repetitive            Aircraft, LLC
 spar cap angles in their      inspections           Mandatory Service
 entirety as a single piece.   required in           Bulletin No. 15AC06-
 Splicing of the main spar     paragraph (f)(6) of   08-10, Amendment A,
 cap angles is not permitted.  this AD.              dated June 23,
                                                     2010; or Burl's
                                                     Aircraft, LLC
                                                     Mandatory Service
                                                     Bulletin No. 15AC06-
                                                     08-10, Amendment B,
                                                     dated June 23,
                                                     2010, Rev.
                                                     Original, September
                                                     15, 2011; and FAA
                                                     Advisory Circular
                                                     (AC) 43.13-1B,
                                                     Change 1, Chapter
                                                     6. AC 43.13-1B can
                                                     be found at http://rgl.faa.gov/.
                                                     Contact Burl's
                                                     Aircraft, LLC in
                                                     paragraph (i) of
                                                     this AD for a
                                                     replacement scheme
                                                     and incorporate the
                                                     replacement scheme.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(9) Only install main spar    As of April 17, 2012  Not applicable.
 cap angles that have been     (the effective date
 inspected and are free of     of this AD).
 cracks, intergranular
 exfoliation, or moderate or
 severe corrosion.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Anchorage Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

 (h) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact August Asay,
Supervisory Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Anchorage ACO, 222 W. 7th Ave.,
14, Anchorage, Alaska 99513; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(i) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) You must use the following service information to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference (IBR) under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (i) Burl's Aircraft, LLC Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 15AC06-
08-10, dated June 8, 2010;
    (ii) Burl's Aircraft, LLC Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 15AC06-
08-10, Amendment A, dated June 23, 2010;
    (iii) Burl's Aircraft, LLC Mandatory Service Bulletin No.
15AC06-08-10, Amendment B, dated June 23, 2010, Rev. Original,
September 15, 2011;
    (iv) Burl's Aircraft, LLC Installation Instruction No. SB
15AC06-08-10, dated September 9, 2011;
    (v) Burl's Aircraft, LLC Drawing No. SB 15AC06-08-10 (not
dated);
    (vi) Burl's Aircraft, LLC Sketch No. SB 15AC06-08-10, dated
September 9, 2011; and
    (vii) Burl's Aircraft, LLC Drawing No. 2-1272 Splice, dated
September 6, 2011; and
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Burl's Aircraft, LLC, P.O. Box 671487, Chugiak, Alaska 99567-1487;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.burlac.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 21, 2012.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-5864 Filed 3-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 150 (Friday, August 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 48062]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16771]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2022-37]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; The Boeing
Company

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations. The
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and
participation in, the FAA's exemption process. Neither publication of
this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary
is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final
disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before August 25, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2022-0555
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to https://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deana Stedman, AIR-612, Federal
Aviation Administration, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198,
phone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, email [email protected].
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 01, 2022.
Daniel J. Commins,
Manager, Technical Writing Section.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2022-0555.
    Petitioner: The Boeing Company.
    Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: Sec.  25.813(e).
    Description of Relief Sought: Petitioner is seeking relief from
14 CFR 25.813(e), which states that no door may be installed between
any passenger seat that is occupiable for takeoff and landing and
any passenger emergency exit, such that the door crosses any egress
path (including aisles, crossaisles, and passageways). Specifically,
the petitioner is proposing to install walls along the aisle in
mini-suites that can be moved for the purpose of assisting
passengers with reduced mobility in transferring in and out of their
seat in Model 787 airplanes. The movable aisle wall, when deployed,
will temporarily block the doorway of the adjacent mini-suite and
consequently inhibit access to or from the seat in that adjacent
mini-suite.

[FR Doc. 2022-16771 Filed 8-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: March 12, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 47)]
[Notices]
[Page 10801-10802]
[DOCID:fr12mr09-118]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Third Plenary Meeting, NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of the NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force.

DATES: The meeting will be held April 7, 2009 starting at 9 a.m. to 12
p.m. Arrive in FAA Lobby at 8:30 a.m. for visitor check in.

ADDRESSES: FAA Auditorium, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW.,
Suite 850, Washington, DC 20036; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (202)
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given for a NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force
meeting. The agenda will include:
     Opening Plenary (Welcome and Introductions)
     Work Group and Subgroup Status Reports and Planned
Activities
     Discussion and Next Steps
     Closing Plenary (Other Business, Document Production, Date
and Place of Next Meeting, Adjourn)
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 5, 2009.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
 [FR Doc. E9-5284 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Panel Members for the Meeting of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory Panel (FIFRA SAP)

to consider and review

Selected Issues Associated with the Risk Assessment Process for Pesticides with Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic Characteristics

October 28-31, 2008

Docket number:  EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0550			OPP Docket Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER>

FIFRA SAP Chair

Steven G. Heeringa, Ph.D.

Research Scientist & Director for Statistical Design

University of Michigan Institute for Social Research

Ann Arbor, Michigan

Designated Federal Official

Myrta Christian, M.S.

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Science Coordination & Policy

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel

EPA East Building, MC 7201M

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC  20460

Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>,   HYPERLINK <EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Members

John R. Bucher, Ph.D., DABT

Associate Director

Environmental Toxicology Program

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Janice E. Chambers, Ph.D., DABT, ATS

William L. Giles Distinguished Professor

Director, Center for Environmental Health Sciences

College of Veterinary Medicine

Mississippi State University

Mississippi State, Mississippi

Kirby C. Donnelly, Ph.D.

Professor and Head

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health

School of Rural Public Health

Texas A&M University System Health Science Center

College Station, Texas

Kenneth M. Portier, Ph.D.

Program Director, Statistics

American Cancer Society

National Home Office

Atlanta, Georgia

Carey N. Pope, Ph.D.

Professor, Head & Sitlington Chair of Toxicology

Department of Physiological Sciences

Oklahoma State University College of Veterinary Medicine

Stillwater, Oklahoma

Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D.

Professor of Aquatic Ecotoxicology & Environmental Toxicology

Department of Environmental Sciences

University of California, Riverside

Riverside, California

FQPA Science Review Board Members

Linda Abbott, Ph.D., J.D.

Regulatory Risk Analyst

USDA-OCE-ORACBA

Office of Risk Assessment and Cost-Benefit Analysis

Washington, D.C.

Terry F. Bidleman, Ph.D.

Senior Research Scientist

Air Quality Research Division

Centre for Atmospheric Research Experiments

Environment Canada

Egbert, Ontario

CANADA

Peter DeLorme, Ph.D.

Senior Science Advisor

Environmental Assessment Directorate

PMRA, Health Canada

Ottawa, Ontario  CANADA

William J. Doucette, Ph.D.

Professor

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

Utah Water Research Laboratory

Center for Environmental Toxicology

Utah State University

Logan, Utah

Jay Gan, Ph.D.

Water Quality Specialist

Professor and Chair

Department of Environmental Sciences

University of California

Riverside, California

James W. Gillett, Ph.D.

Professor Emeritus of Natural Resources

Cornell University

Ithaca, New York

Brendan Hickie, Ph.D.

Assistant Professor

Environmental & Resource Studies Program

Trent University

Peterborough, Ontario

CANADA

Wilbert J. Lick, Ph.D.

Research Professor

Department of Mechanical Engineering

University of California

Santa Barbara, California

Randy L. Maddalena, Ph.D.

Research Scientist

Environmental Energy Technology Division

Indoor Environment Department

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Berkeley, California

James Meador, Ph.D.

Environmental Toxicologist

NOAA Fisheries, Northwest Fisheries Science Center

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Fish Health Program

Seattle, Washington

James T. Oris, Ph.D.

Associate Dean for Research and Scholarship

Professor

Department of Zoology

Miami University of Ohio

Oxford, Ohio

Staci L. Simonich, Ph.D.

Associate Professor

Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology

and Department of Chemistry

Oregon State University

Corvallis, Oregon

Tammo S. Steenhuis, Ph.D.

Professor of Watershed Management

Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering

Cornell University

Ithaca, New York

Louis J. Thibodeaux, Ph.D.

Jesse Coates Professor of Engineering

Gordon A. & Mary Cain Department of Chemical Engineering

Chair Geology and Geophysics

Emeritus Director of Hazardous Substance Research Center (S/SW)

Louisiana State University

Baton Rouge, Louisiana


[Federal Register: December 30, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 249)]
[Notices]
[Page 69122]
[DOCID:fr30de09-81]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0664]

Second Annual Sentinel Initiative Public Workshop

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of public workshop.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the following
workshop: Second Annual Sentinel Initiative Public Workshop. This 1-day
workshop, organized and hosted by the Engelberg Center for Health Care
Reform at Brookings, is supported by a grant from FDA. This workshop is
intended to communicate the current status and future vision of active
medical product surveillance activities and explore stakeholder
perspectives on a broad range of issues. The workshop will feature a
series of presentations on recently completed FDA contracts to inform
various aspects of the development of the Sentinel System; an update on
FDA's ongoing pilot projects in active surveillance of medical product
safety; and a discussion of three issues of broad interest: maintaining
patient privacy while conducting medical product safety surveillance,
developing the Sentinel System as a national resource for medical
product safety surveillance for others outside of FDA, and developing a
multi-purpose distributed system that can be used to conduct safety
surveillance, comparative effectiveness research, product quality
assessment and to address other types of public health questions.
    Date and Time: The workshop will be held on January 11, 2010, from
8:30 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.
    Location: The workshop will be held at Marriott Metro Center at 775
12th Street NW., Washington, DC 20005.
    Contact: Kayla Garvin, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Bldg. 22, rm. 4339, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20903,<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Registration: To attend the workshop, please register at http://
tinyurl.com/yce6c3z. When registering, provide the following
information: Your name, title, company or organization (if applicable),
address, phone number, and e-mail address. There is no fee to register
for the public workshop and because seating is limited, registration
will be on a first-come, first-served basis. A 1-hour lunch break is
scheduled; however no food will be provided. There are multiple
restaurants within walking distance of the hotel where attendees can
purchase lunch. If you need special accommodations due to a disability,
please contact Brookings' event coordinator at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by e-
mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>at least 7 days in advance.
    Transcripts: Please be advised that as soon as a transcript is
available, it will be accessible at http://www.fda.gov/Safety/
FDAsSentinelInitiative/ucm149341.htm. It may be viewed at the Division
of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD. A transcript will also be
available in either hardcopy or on CD-ROM, after submission of a
Freedom of Information request. Written requests are to be sent to the
Division of Freedom of Information (HFI-35), Office of Management
Programs, Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, rm. 6-30,
Rockville, MD 20857.

    Dated: December 23, 2009.
David Horowitz,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-30971 Filed 12-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register: April 14, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 72)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 19983-19986]
[DOCID:fr14ap08-12]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-29331; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-136-AD;
Amendment 39-15459; AD 2008-08-07]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Saab Model SAAB-Fairchild SF340A (SAAB/
SF340A) and SAAB 340B Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    A crack has been found in an axle adaptor during fatigue
testing. It was found that the internal edges of the dowel holes did
not have the correct radius and the crack had developed from the
edge of one of the dowel holes.
    A crack in the axle adaptor can cause the axle adaptor to fail
and ultimately lead to loss of [the] wheels and total loss of brake
capability.

    We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective May 19, 2008.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of May 19, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Borfitz, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2677; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR

part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on September 28, 2007
(72 FR 55116). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for
the specified products. The MCAI states:

    A crack has been found in an axle adaptor during fatigue
testing. It was found that the internal edges of the dowel holes did
not have the correct radius and the crack had developed from the
edge of one of the dowel holes.
    A crack in the axle adaptor can cause the axle adaptor to fail
and ultimately lead to loss of [the] wheels and total loss of brake
capability.

    The corrective action includes doing repetitive ultrasonic
inspections to detect cracking in the axle adaptor; replacing the axle
adaptor if necessary; and ultimately doing the terminating action of
inspecting and modifying the main landing gear (MLG) shock strut and
axle adaptors. The inspection is a crack test. The modification
includes measuring the dowel hole, and corrective actions if necessary
(replacing the axle adaptor, repairing the dowel hole) and, when
accomplished, terminates the repetitive inspection requirements. You
may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Clarification of Service Bulletin Revisions

    We have revised paragraph (f)(5) of the final rule to clarify the
applicable service bulletin revisions for the parts installation.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD with the change described
previously. We determined that this change will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect about 220 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about 9 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts cost would be
negligible. Where the service information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the
U.S. operators to be $158,400, or $720 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2008-08-07 Saab Aircraft AB: Amendment 39-15459. Docket No. FAA-
2007-29331; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-136-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective May 19,
2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to the airplanes listed in paragraphs (c)(1)
and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category, unless equipped
with main landing gear (MLG) shock struts modified in accordance
with APPH Service Bulletin AIR83064-32-12 or AIR83022-32-32.
    (1) Saab Model SAAB-Fairchild SF340A (SAAB/SF340A) airplanes,
serial numbers (S/Ns) SF340A-004 through -159.
    (2) Saab Model SAAB 340B airplanes, S/Ns 340B-160 through -459.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
Gear.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    A crack has been found in an axle adaptor during fatigue
testing. It was found that the internal edges of the dowel holes did
not have the correct radius and the crack had developed from the
edge of one of the dowel holes.
    A crack in the axle adaptor can cause the axle adaptor to fail
and ultimately lead to loss of [the] wheels and total loss of brake
capability.

    The corrective action includes doing repetitive ultrasonic
inspections to detect cracking in the axle adaptor; replacing the
axle adaptor if necessary; and ultimately doing the terminating
action of inspecting and modifying the main landing gear (MLG) shock
strut and axle adaptors. The inspection is a crack test. The
modification includes measuring the dowel hole and corrective
actions if necessary (replacing the axle adaptor, repairing the
dowel hole), and, when accomplished, terminates the repetitive
inspection requirements.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 8,000 flight cycles since the last MLG overhaul, or
within 1,500 flight cycles, or 6 months after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs latest: Inspect the MLG in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Saab Service Bulletin 340-32-133,
Revision 01, dated May 3, 2006. If any crack is found, before
further flight: Replace the axle adaptor in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Saab Service Bulletin 340-32-133,
Revision 01, dated May 3, 2006.
    (2) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this
AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed 2,000 flight cycles until
the terminating action required by paragraph (f)(3) of this AD is
accomplished.
    (3) Within 12,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD, or at the next MLG overhaul, whichever occurs earlier: Inspect
and modify the MLG shock strut and axle adaptors in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of APPH Service Bulletin AIR83064-
32-12, Revision 3, dated April 26, 2006; or AIR83022-32-32, Revision
3, dated April 26, 2006; as applicable.
    (4) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with the service bulletins listed in paragraphs
(f)(4)(i), (f)(4)(ii), and (f)(4)(iii) of this AD, as applicable,
are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions in this
AD.
    (i) Saab Service Bulletin 340-32-133, dated April 19, 2006.
    (ii) APPH Service Bulletin AIR83064-32-12, dated January 2006;
Revision 1, dated January 23, 2006; and Revision 2, dated March 30,
2006.
    (iii) APPH Service Bulletin AIR83022-32-32, dated January 2006;
Revision 1, dated January 23, 2006; and Revision 2, dated March 30,
2006.
    (5) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install
an MLG shock strut having part number (P/N) AIR83022 or AIR83064, or
axle adaptor having P/N AIR127308, AIR390226, or AIR130238, unless
it has been inspected and modified in accordance with APPH Service
Bulletin AIR83022-32-32 or AIR83064-32-12, as specified in paragraph
(f)(3), (f)(4)(ii), or (f)(4)(iii) of this AD, as applicable.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, ANM-
116, International Branch, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Mike
Borfitz, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2006-0263, dated
August 29, 2006; Saab Service Bulletin 340-32-133, Revision 01,
dated May 3, 2006; APPH Service Bulletin AIR83064-32-12, Revision 3,
dated April 26, 2006; and APPH Service Bulletin AIR83022-32-32,
Revision 3, dated April 26, 2006; for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use the service information specified in Table 1 of
this AD to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Saab
Aircraft AB, SAAB Aircraft Product Support, S-581.88,
Link[ouml]ping, Sweden.
    (3) You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-
locations.html.

              Table 1.--Material Incorporated by Reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Service Bulletin           Revision                Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPH Service Bulletin                       3  April 26, 2006.
 AIR83022-32-32.
APPH Service Bulletin                       3  April 26, 2006.
 AIR83064-32-12.
Saab Service Bulletin 340-32-              01  May 3, 2006.
 133.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 31, 2008.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-7299 Filed 4-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 86 (Friday, May 3, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26101-26102]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10505]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0087]

Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation
(DOT).

ACTION: Notice of fourth meeting of advisory committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the fourth meeting of the Advisory
Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection.

DATES: The fourth meeting of the advisory committee is scheduled for
May 21, 2013, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Federal Aviation
Administration's auditorium on the 3rd floor of the FAA Headquarters
building at 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591.
Attendance is open to the public up to the room's capacity; however,
since access to the FAA headquarters building is controlled for
security purposes, any member of the general public who plans to attend
this meeting must notify the Department contact identified below at
least five (5) calendar days prior to the meeting date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To register to attend the meeting,
please contact Jessica Payne, Principal Research Analyst, (703) 894-
6560, or Amanda Stokes, Associate Research Analyst<PHONE_NUMBER>,
Centra Technology, Inc<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For other
information please contact Nicholas Lowry, Senior Attorney, Office of
Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings<EMAIL_ADDRESS>U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC,
20590;<PHONE_NUMBER> (phone),<PHONE_NUMBER> (fax).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 24, 2012, the Secretary, as mandated
by Section 411 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Pub. L.
112-95, 126 Stat. 11 (2012)), established the Advisory Committee on
Aviation Consumer Protection and announced those persons appointed as
members. The committee's charter, drafted in accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), as amended, 5 U.S.C. App. 2,
sets forth policies for the operation of the advisory committee and is
available on the Department's Web site at http://www.dot.gov/affairs/2012/dot5912.html.
    The fourth meeting of the committee is scheduled for Tuesday, May
21, 2013, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time in the auditorium of
the Federal Aviation Administration at its headquarters building, 800
Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591. At the meeting, staff
members from the DOT's Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings
(Enforcement Office) will describe the steps taken by the Department to
implement the committee's first set of recommendations to the Secretary
and provide an update on the status of on-going rulemaking and
enforcement initiatives affecting consumer protection in air travel.
The meeting will also address privacy of personally identifiable
information collected in connection with the purchase of air travel
from airlines and travel agents. Issues to be addressed are: what
information is collected and by whom; who retains information
(airlines, travel agents, including on-line travel agents (OTAs), and
global distribution systems (GDSs)); what privacy policies are in place
and is information used consistent with those policies; and what
security measures are in place to protect against unauthorized access?
We plan on hearing from government representatives, as well as speakers
from the airline and travel agent industry, including GDSs, online
travel agents, and consumer groups on the privacy issue. In addition,
the committee expects to discuss possible agenda items and the
scheduling of future meetings.
    As announced in the notices of previous meetings of the committee,
the meeting will be open to the public, and written and, time
permitting, oral comments by members of the public are invited. Members
of the public may present written comments at any time. The docket
number referenced above (OST-2012-0087, available at https://www.regulations.gov) has been established for committee documents
including any written comments that may be filed. At the discretion of
the Chairperson and time permitting, after completion of the planned
agenda, individual members of the public may provide oral comments. Any
oral comments presented must be limited to the objectives of the
committee and will be limited to five (5) minutes per person.
Individual members of the public who wish to present oral comments must
notify the Department contact noted above via email that they wish to
present oral comments at least five (5) calendar days prior to the
meeting. Also, since access to the FAA headquarters building is
controlled for security purposes, we ask that any member of the general
public who plans to attend this meeting notify the Department contact
noted above no later than five (5) calendar days prior to the meeting
date (i.e., by May 16). Attendance will be necessarily limited by the
size of the meeting room.
    Persons with a disability who plan to attend the meeting and
require special accommodations, such as an interpreter for the hearing
impaired, should notify the Department contact noted above at least
seven (7) calendar days prior to the meeting. Persons attending with a
service animal should also advise us of that fact so that it can be
taken into account in connection with space and possible allergy
issues.
    Notice of this meeting is being provided in accordance with the
FACA and the General Services Administration regulations covering
management of Federal advisory committees. (41 CFR part 102-3.)

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 29, 2013.
Samuel Podberesky,
Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement & Proceedings, U.S.
Department of Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2013-10505 Filed 5-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P