[Federal Register: March 25, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 56)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 12737-12739]
[DOCID:fr25mr09-45]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0261; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-017-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH Models Dornier
228-100, Dornier 228-101, Dornier 228-200, Dornier 228-201, Dornier
228-202, and Dornier 228-212 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    Excessive wear on a guide pin of a power lever has been detected
during inspections. The total loss of the pin could cause loss of
the flight idle stop and lead to inadvertent activation of the beta
mode in flight. The inadvertent activation of beta mode in flight
can result in loss of control of the airplane.

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 24, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Davison, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0261;
Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-017-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued AD
No.: 2009-0031, dated February 18, 2009 (referred to after this as
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:

    Excessive wear on a guide pin of a power lever has been detected
during inspections. The total loss of the pin could cause loss of
the flight idle stop and lead to inadvertent activation of the beta
mode in flight. The inadvertent activation of beta mode in flight
can result in loss of control of the airplane.
    For the reasons described above, this new EASA Airworthiness
Directive (AD) introduces a repetitive detailed inspection of the
guide pins of the power and condition levers and requires the
replacement of the pins that exceed the allowable wear-limits.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    RUAG Aerospace Defence Technology has issued Dornier 228 Alert
Service Bulletin ASB-228-279, dated December 19, 2008. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA

policies. Any such differences are highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 17 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 20 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts would cost
about $10 per product.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $27,370, or $1,610 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH: Docket No. FAA-2009-0261; Directorate
Identifier 2009-CE-017-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by April 24, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Models Dornier 228-100, Dornier 228-101,
Dornier 228-200, Dornier 228-201, Dornier 228-202, and Dornier 228-
212 airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 76: Engine
Controls.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    Excessive wear on a guide pin of a power lever has been detected
during inspections. The total loss of the pin could cause loss of
the flight idle stop and lead to inadvertent activation of the beta
mode in flight. The inadvertent activation of beta mode in flight
can result in loss of control of the airplane.
    For the reasons described above, this new EASA Airworthiness
Directive (AD) introduces a repetitive detailed inspection of the
guide pins of the power and condition levers and requires the
replacement of the pins that exceed the allowable wear-limits.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) For throttle box assemblies with less than 12,000 hours
time-in-service (TIS) since new as of the effective date of this AD:
inspect the guide pins of the power and condition levers following
RUAG Aerospace Defence Technology Dornier 228 Alert Service Bulletin
ASB-228-279, dated December 19, 2008, at the following times:
    (i) Initially within 9,600 hours TIS since new or within the
next 1,200 hours TIS, whichever occurs later; and
    (ii) Repetitively thereafter within 1,200 hours TIS since any
previous inspection in which the power and condition levers guide
pins were not replaced or within 9,600 hours TIS since the previous
inspection in which the power and condition levers guide pins were
replaced.

    Note 1: If the hours TIS of the throttle box assembly is
unknown, use the hours TIS of the airplane to determine the
compliance time for the inspection.

    (2) For throttle box assemblies with 12,000 hours TIS or more
and less than 13,200 hours TIS since new as of the effective date of
this AD: inspect the guide pins of the power and condition levers
following RUAG Aerospace Defence Technology Dornier 228 Alert
Service Bulletin ASB-228-279, dated December 19, 2008, at the
following times:
    (i) Initially within 13,200 hours TIS since new or within the
next 100 hours TIS, whichever occurs later; and
    (ii) Repetitively thereafter within 1,200 hours TIS since any
previous inspection in which the power and condition levers guide
pins were not replaced or within 9,600 hours TIS since the previous
inspection in which the power and condition levers guide pins were
replaced.
    (3) For throttle box assemblies with 13,200 hours TIS or more
since new as of the effective date of this AD: inspect the guide
pins of the power and condition levers following RUAG Aerospace
Defence Technology Dornier 228 Alert Service Bulletin ASB-228-279,
dated December 19, 2008, at the following times:
    (i) Initially within the next 100 hours TIS; and
    (ii) Repetitively thereafter within 1,200 hours TIS since any
previous inspection in which the power and condition levers guide
pins were not replaced or within 9,600 hours TIS since the previous
inspection in which the power and condition levers guide pins were
replaced.
    (4) For all throttle box assemblies: before further flight after
any inspection required in paragraph (f)(1), (f)(2), or (f)(3) of
this AD, replace any guide pin that exceeds the acceptable wear-
limits as defined in RUAG Aerospace Defence Technology Dornier 228
Alert Service Bulletin ASB-228-279, dated December 19, 2008.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Greg Davison, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using
any approved AMOC on

any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI EASA AD No.: 2009-0031, dated February 18,
2009; and RUAG Aerospace Defence Technology Dornier 228 Alert
Service Bulletin ASB-228-279, dated December 19, 2008, for related
information.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 19, 2009.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E9-6558 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: May 13, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 93)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 27477-27479]
[DOCID:fr13my08-10]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0541; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-063-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
(Jetstream) Model 4101 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    Resulting from the assessment of fuel tank wiring installations
required by SFAR 88 (Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88) and
equivalent JAA/EASA (Joint Aviation Authorities/European Aviation
Safety Agency) policy, BAE Systems identified two features in the
Jetstream 4100 where the need for design changes was apparent. * * *
    Insufficient or defective bonding in the fuel tank area, if not
corrected, could lead to ignition of fuel vapours and subsequent
fuel tank explosion.
* * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 12, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1175; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0541;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-063-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2008-0040, dated February 27, 2008 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    Resulting from the assessment of fuel tank wiring installations
required by SFAR 88 (Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88) and
equivalent JAA/EASA (Joint Aviation Authorities/European Aviation
Safety Agency) policy, BAE Systems identified two features in the
Jetstream 4100 where the need for design changes was apparent. One
of these is addressed by Service Bulletin (SB) J41-28-013 which
introduces additional bonding leads between pipes, structure and
various components to improve the electrical bond paths within the
fuel tank areas. This design change is identified by modification
number JM41659. Additionally, SB J41-28-013 provides instructions to
inspect the existing bonding leads, to replace any defective leads
and to examine all fuel system pipe runs in the wings to ensure
appropriate clearances are maintained.
    Insufficient or defective bonding in the fuel tank area, if not
corrected, could lead to ignition of fuel vapours and subsequent
fuel tank explosion.
    For the reason stated above, this EASA Airworthiness Directive
(AD) requires the installation of additional bonding leads,
inspection [for defects] of existing bonding leads and [for
clearance of] all fuel system pipe runs in the wings and follow-on
corrective actions, as necessary.

Corrective actions include replacing any defective bonding leads and
adjusting clearances of the fuel system pipe runs. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
    The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel
tank explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the service history of airplanes
subject to those regulations, and existing maintenance practices for
fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings, we issued a
regulation titled ``Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review,
Flammability Reduction and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements''
(66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards
for transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements, this rule
included Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 (``SFAR 88,''
Amendment 21-78, and subsequent Amendments 21-82 and 21-83).
    Among other actions, SFAR 88 requires certain type design (i.e.,
type certificate (TC) and supplemental type certificate (STC)) holders
to substantiate that their fuel tank systems can prevent ignition
sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement applies to type design
holders for large turbine-powered transport airplanes and for
subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It requires them to
perform design reviews and to develop design changes and maintenance
procedures if their designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety
standards. As explained in the preamble to the rule, we intended to
adopt airworthiness directives to mandate any changes found necessary
to address unsafe conditions identified as a result of these reviews.
    In evaluating these design reviews, we have established four
criteria intended to define the unsafe conditions associated with fuel
tank systems that require corrective actions. The percentage of
operating time during which fuel tanks are exposed to flammable
conditions is one of these criteria. The other three criteria address
the failure types under evaluation: Single failures, single failures in
combination with a latent condition(s), and in-service failure
experience. For all four criteria, the evaluations included
consideration of previous actions taken that may mitigate the need for
further action.
    The Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) has issued a regulation that
is similar to SFAR 88. (The JAA is an associated body of the European
Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC) representing the civil aviation
regulatory authorities of a number of European States who have agreed
to co-operate in developing and implementing common safety regulatory
standards and procedures.) Under this regulation, the JAA stated that
all members of the ECAC that hold type certificates for transport
category airplanes are required to conduct a design review against
explosion risks.
    We have determined that the actions identified in this AD are
necessary to reduce the potential of ignition sources inside fuel
tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result
in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.

Relevant Service Information

    BAE Systems (Operations) Limited has issued Service Bulletin J41-
28-013, Revision 1, dated January 10, 2008. The actions described in
this service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 7 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 80 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $1,700 per product. Where
the service information lists required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these
costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $56,700, or $8,100 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

BAE Systems (Operations) Limited (Formerly British Aerospace
Regional Aircraft): Docket No. FAA-2008-0541; Directorate Identifier
2008-NM-063-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by June 12, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Model Jetstream 4101 airplanes, certificated in any category, all
serial numbers.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    Resulting from the assessment of fuel tank wiring installations
required by SFAR 88 (Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88) and
equivalent JAA/EASA (Joint Aviation Authorities/European Aviation
Safety Agency) policy, BAE Systems identified two features in the
Jetstream 4100 where the need for design changes was apparent. One
of these is addressed by Service Bulletin (SB) J41-28-013 which
introduces additional bonding leads between pipes, structures and
various components to improve the electrical bond paths within the
fuel tank areas. This design change is identified by modification
number JM41659. Additionally, SB J41-28-013 provides instructions to
inspect the existing bonding leads, to replace any defective leads
and to examine all fuel system pipe runs in the wings to ensure
appropriate clearances are maintained.
    Insufficient or defective bonding in the fuel tank area, if not
corrected, could lead to ignition of fuel vapours and subsequent
fuel tank explosion.
    For the reason stated above, this EASA Airworthiness Directive
(AD) requires the installation of additional bonding leads,
inspection [for defects] of existing bonding leads and [for
clearance of] all fuel system pipe runs in the wings and follow-on
corrective actions, as necessary.

Corrective actions include replacing any defective bonding leads and
adjusting clearances of the fuel system pipe runs.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, unless
already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Inspect the bonding leads between ribs 1 and 9, and between
ribs 16 and 19, in the left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH) wings in
accordance with paragraph 2.B.(2) of the Accomplishment Instructions
of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Service Bulletin J41-28-013,
Revision 1, dated January 10, 2008; and, before next flight, replace
all defective bonding leads with airworthy parts in accordance with
the service bulletin.
    (2) Inspect all fuel system pipe runs inside the LH and RH wings
in accordance with paragraph 2.B.(3) of the Accomplishment
Instructions of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Service Bulletin
J41-28-013, Revision 1, dated January 10, 2008; and, if incorrect
clearances are found, before next flight, adjust clearances in
accordance with the service bulletin.
    (3) Install additional electrical bonding of components within
the LH and RH wings in accordance with paragraphs 2.B.(4) to
2.B.(15) of the Accomplishment Instructions of BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Service Bulletin J41-28-013, Revision 1, dated
January 10, 2008.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Todd
Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2008-0040, dated
February 27, 2008, and BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Service
Bulletin J41-28-013, Revision 1, dated January 10, 2008, for related
information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 6, 2008.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-10648 Filed 5-12-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Incorporation by Reference

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0288

May 19, 2010

The contents of the following docket are hereby incorporated by
reference into and is considered to be included in, contained in, and to
have been placed in Docket EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0288 (Expedited Approval of
Alternative Test Procedures for the Analysis of Contaminants Under the
Safe Drinking Water Act; Analysis and Sampling Procedures)

Docket EPA-HQ-OW-2002-0061 (National Primary Drinking Water Regulations:
 Ground Water Rule)

Accessing Dockets:

Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
through   HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov/"
http://www.regulations.gov/  or in hard copy at the Water Docket in the
EPA Docket Center, (EPA/DC) EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW, Washington, D.C.  The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays.  The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the Water Docket is (202)
566-2426.


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 126 (Tuesday, June 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39251-39253]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14011]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-89146; File No. SR-IEX-2020-07]

Self-Regulatory Organizations: Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend IEX
Rule 11.190(b)(13) To Discontinue the Market Maker Peg Order and Make
Conforming Changes

June 24, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on June 15, 2020, the Investors Exchange LLC (``IEX'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Act \4\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\5\ IEX is filing with the Commission a
proposed rule change to amend IEX Rule 11.190(b)(13) (Market Maker Peg
Order) to discontinue the Market Maker Peg Order and make conforming
changes. The Exchange has designated this rule change as ``non-
controversial'' under Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \6\ and provided
the Commission with the notice required by Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\7\ The text of the proposed rule change is available at the
Exchange's website at www.iextrading.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statement [sic] may be examined
at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory
organization has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C
below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to amend IEX Rule
11.190(b)(13) (Market Maker Peg Order) to discontinue the Market Maker
Peg Order and make conforming changes to other IEX rules.
    The Market Maker Peg order is a one-sided displayed limit order
that is designed to simplify market maker compliance with the
continuous quoting and pricing obligations set forth in IEX Rule 11.151
by providing quotation adjusting functionality.\8\ Only IEX Members
registered as Market Makers pursuant to IEX Rule 11.150 may use Market
Maker Peg Orders, and use of such orders is optional.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See IEX Rule 11.190(b)(13) for a complete description of the
Market Maker Peg order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to its quotation adjusting functionality, the Market
Maker Peg order is also designed to provide an effective compliance
tool to facilitate market makers' compliance with the requirements of
Rule 15c3-5 under the Act (the ``Market Access Rule'') \9\ and
Regulation SHO.\10\ Specifically, when using a Market Maker Peg order,
market makers would have control of order origination, as required by
the Market Access Rule, while also allowing market makers to make
marking and locate determinations prior to order entry, as required by
Regulation SHO, while also facilitating compliance with their Exchange
market making obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-5.
    \10\ 17 CFR 242.200 through 242.204.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Market Maker Peg Orders are not eligible for routing pursuant to
IEX Rule 11.230(b) and are always displayed on the Exchange. In
addition, a new timestamp is created for the order each time that it is
automatically adjusted in accordance with the proposed rule. Market
Maker Peg Orders may only be entered by a registered Market Maker,
pursuant to IEX Rule 11.150.
    There are currently no Members registered as Market Makers and
therefore no Members eligible to use the order. Accordingly, the
Exchange proposes to discontinue the Market Maker Peg order, delete the
existing text of IEX Rule 11.190(b)(13) (which describes the Market
Maker Peg order), and reserve that provision.
    In conjunction with the proposed discontinuation of the Market
Maker Peg order, the Exchange proposes to make two conforming changes.
First, the Exchange proposes to delete the text of IEX Rule
11.340(d)(1)(A), related to rounding of the price of Market Maker Peg
Orders in connection with the Plan to Implement a Tick Size Pilot
Program (which has terminated). Second, the Exchange proposes to delete
text in IEX Rule 11.510(c)(1) which provides that, pursuant to Rule
11.190(b)(13), each time a Market Maker Peg Order is automatically
adjusted by the System, all inbound and outbound communications related
to the modified order instruction will traverse an additional POP
between the Market Maker Peg Order repricing logic and the Order Book.
Both of these provisions are rendered obsolete with the discontinuation
of the Market Maker Peg order, as proposed.
2. Statutory Basis
    IEX believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act in general,\11\ and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\ in particular, in that it is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed in the Purpose section, the proposed rule change is
designed to discontinue the Market Maker Peg Order, because no Members
are eligible to use the order type. Consequently, the Exchange believes
is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest
to discontinue the Market Maker Peg Order since the lack of current
demand for the order type does not warrant the infrastructure and
ongoing maintenance expenses required to support it. Further, the
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest since it is designed to
avoid any potential confusion regarding the availability of the Market
Maker Peg Order to Members. In addition, the Exchange notes that use of
the Market Maker Peg Order is purely optional on the part of a Market
Maker and, in the event that any Member were to register as a Market
Maker, such Member could use other IEX order types to comply with the
continuous quoting and pricing obligations set forth in IEX Rule
11.151. Lastly, the Exchange does not believe that this proposal will
permit unfair discrimination among customers, brokers, or dealers
because the Market Maker Peg Order will no longer be available to any
Member of the Exchange.
    Further, the Exchange believes that the proposed conforming rule
changes, as discussed in the Purpose section, are consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest because they will
provide clarity to market participants by deleting references to the
now discontinued Market Maker Peg Order.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposal will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is not designed to
address any competitive issues but rather remove an order type for
which there is currently no demand and eliminate the infrastructure and
ongoing maintenance expenses to support it.
    Furthermore, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change does
not impose any burden on intra-market competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because, as
described above, the Market Maker Peg order will no longer be available
to any Member of the Exchange, and thus all Members will be impacted in
the same manner. Further, as discussed in the Statutory Basis section,
use of the Market Maker Peg Order by a registered Market Maker is
optional and not required in order to comply with the in the continuous
quoting and pricing obligations set forth in IEX Rule 11.151.
    The Exchange also does not believe that the proposed rule change
would impose a burden on inter-market competition since other exchanges
are free to adopt or discontinue comparable order types.
    Finally, the proposed conforming rule changes, as discussed in the
Purpose section, are not designed to address any competitive issue, but
rather to provide clarity to market participants by deleting references
to the now discontinued Market Maker Peg Order.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has designated this rule filing as non-controversial
under Section 19(b)(3)(A) \13\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \14\
thereunder. Because the proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \15\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-IEX-2020-07 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-IEX-2020-07. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available for inspection
and copying at the IEX's principal office and on its internet website
at www.iextrading.com. All comments received will be posted without
change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact
or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-IEX-2020-07
and should be submitted on or before July 21, 2020.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-14011 Filed 6-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: December 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 245)]
[Notices]
[Page 68260]
[DOCID:fr23de09-46]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP10-27-000]

Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc.; Notice of Application

December 15, 2009.
    Take notice that on December 10, 2009, Southern Star Central Gas
Pipeline, Inc. (Southern Star), 4700 Highway 56, Owensboro, Kentucky
42301, filed an application in Docket No. CP10-27-000, pursuant to
section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) as amended and Part 157 of
the Commission's regulations requesting certificate authority to
abandon by removal two Cooper-Bessemer GMVH-10 2000 horsepower units
(No. 3 and No. 4) and appurtenant facilities including auxiliary
equipment and buildings. The facilities proposed for abandonment are
known as Southern Star's United Compressor Station which is located in
the North \1/4\ Section 3, Township 29 South, Range 35 West on the site
of Southern Star's existing Hugoton Compressor Station in Grant County,
Kansas all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file
with the Commission and open for public inspection.
    Any questions concerning this application should be directed to
David N. Roberts, Manager, Regulatory Affairs, Southern Star Central
Gas Pipeline, Inc., 4700 KY Highway 56 Owensboro, Kentucky 42301, (270)
852-4654 (phone),<PHONE_NUMBER> (fax) or via e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either complete
its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the Commission's
public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify Federal and State agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all Federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    This filing is available for review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://
www.ferc.gov using the ``e-Library'' link. Enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for
TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 14 copies of filings made in the proceeding with the Commission
and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other party. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    Protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the
Internet in lieu of paper; see, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link.
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings.
    Comment Date: January 5, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-30455 Filed 12-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: February 12, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 28)]
[Notices]
[Page 7040]
[DOCID:fr12fe09-39]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD09-4-000]

Integrating Renewable Resources Into the Wholesale Electric Grid;
Notice of Technical Conference

February 5, 2009.
    Take notice that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will hold
a technical conference on March 2, 2009, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. (EST) in
the Commission Meeting Room at the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. The conference
will be open for the public to attend and advance registration is not
required. Members of the Commission will attend and participate in the
conference.
    The purpose of this conference is to seek information on the
challenges posed by integration of large amounts of variable renewable
generation into wholesale markets and grids as well as on innovative
solutions to these challenges. The Commission previously dealt with the
technical differences of wind power from other forms of generation in
2005, when the Commission issued Order No. 661.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Interconnection for Wind Energy, Order No. 661, FERC Stats.
& Regs. ] 31,186, order on reh'g, Order No. 661-A, FERC Stats. &
Regs. ] 31,198 (2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission anticipates significant additions of wind generation
as well as generation from other variable renewable sources. This
growth in variable renewable generation could create new challenges for
grid and market operators with regard to costs and reliability. The
agenda for this conference will be published at a later time.
    Those wishing to participate as a panelist should submit a request
form located at https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/registration/weg-03-02-
09-speaker-form.asp by the close of business on Friday, February 13,
2009.
    A free webcast of this event is available through http://
www.ferc.gov. Anyone with Internet access who desires to view this
event can do so by navigating to the Calendar of Events at http://
www.ferc.gov and locating this event in the Calendar. The event will
contain a link to its webcast. The Capitol Connection provides
technical support for the free webcasts. It also offers access to this
event via television in the Washington, DC area and via phone-bridge
for a fee. If you have any questions, visit http://
www.CapitolConnection.org or contact Danelle Perkowski or David
Reininger at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Transcripts of the conference will be available immediately for a
fee from Ace Reporting Company<PHONE_NUMBER> or 1-800-336-6646). They
will be available for free on the Commission's eLibrary system and on
the Calendar of Events approximately one week after the conference.
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please
send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll free 1-866-208-
3372 (voice) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a FAX to<PHONE_NUMBER>
with the required accommodations.
    For more information about this conference, please contact: Sarah
McKinley at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(202) 502-8368.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-2965 Filed 2-11-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P