[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 22, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50644-50646]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20694]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 22, 2012 /
Proposed Rules

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0880; Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-004-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Airplane Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Cessna Airplane Company Model 525 airplanes equipped with
certain part number (P/N) air conditioning (A/C) compressor motors.
This proposed AD was prompted by reports of smoke and/or fire in the
tailcone caused by brushes wearing beyond their limits on the A/C
motor. This proposed AD would require inspection of the number of hours
on the A/C compressor hour meter, inspection of the logbook, and
replacement of the brushes on certain P/N A/C compressor motors or
deactivation of the A/C system until replacement of the brushes. This
proposed AD also requires reporting of aircraft information related to
the replacement of the brushes. We are proposing this AD to correct the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 9, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Abraham, Aerospace Engineer,
Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 1801 Airport Road, Room
100, Wichita, Kansas 67209; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0880;
Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-004-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We received more than 10 reports of smoke/fire (3 reports of fire)
in the tailcone on Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) 525, 550, and 560
airplanes, where investigation revealed brushes had worn beyond their
limits on the part number (P/N) 1134104-1 A/C compressor motors. When
the brush wears down, the rivet in the brush contacts the commutator,
causing sparks (potential ignition source) and excessive heat build-up
within the motor assembly. The A/C motor is located in the tailcone
where flammable fluids are present (fuel lines and some hydraulics) on
the Cessna airplanes. There is no fire detection or fire extinguishing
equipment in the tailcone.
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in a fire in the
tailcone with no means to detect or extinguish it.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require repetitive inspection of the
compressor hour meter on Cessna Model 525 airplanes that have P/N
1134104-1 or 1134104-5 A/C compressor motor installed; an aircraft
logbook check for an entry for replacing the brushes, compressor motor,
or compressor condenser module assembly (pallet); and replacement of
the brushes on the A/C motor or deactivation of the A/C system with
installation of a placard prohibiting use of the A/C system until
replacement of the brushes. This proposed AD would also require, when
the brushes are replaced, reporting of aircraft information related to
the replacement of the brushes. The FAA is analyzing this unsafe
condition on airplanes certificated under 14 CFR part 25 and may take
AD action on those airplanes.
    The reporting data required by this proposed AD will enable us to
obtain better insight into brush wear. The reporting data will also
indicate if the replacement intervals we established are adequate.
After we analyze the reporting data received, we may take future
rulemaking action.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 408 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
              Action                    Labor cost             Parts cost             product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspect and replace brushes on     11 work-hours x $85  $252....................          $1,187        $484,296
 the A/C motor.                     per hour = $935.
Return shipment of brushes to the  $15 per return with  Not applicable..........              30          12,240
 manufacturer.                      two required
                                    returns.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):

Cessna Aircraft Company: Docket No. FAA-2012-0880; Directorate
Identifier 2012-CE-004-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by October 9, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Cessna Aircraft Company Model 525 airplanes,
serial number (S/N) 525-0001 through 525-0558, and 525-0600 through
525-0701, that
    (1) are equipped with part number (P/N) 1134104-1 or 1134104-5
air conditioning (A/C) compressor motor; and
    (2) are certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 21, Air Conditioning.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of smoke and/or fire in the
tailcone caused by brushes wearing beyond their limits on the A/C
motor. We are issuing this AD to require replacement of the brushes
on certain P/N A/C compressor motors or deactivation of the A/C
system until replacement of the brushes. This AD also requires
reporting of aircraft information related to the replacement of the
brushes.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspections

    Within the next 30 days after the effective date of this AD or
within the next 10 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first, do the following:
    (1) Inspect the number of hours on the A/C compressor hour
meter; and
    (2) Check the aircraft logbook for any entry for replacing the
A/C compressor motor brushes with new brushes or replacing the
compressor motor or compressor condenser module assembly (pallet)
with a motor or assembly that has new brushes.
    (i) If the logbook contains an entry for replacement of parts as
specified in the paragraph above, determine the number of hours on
the A/C compressor motor brushes by comparing the number of hours on
the compressor motor since replacement and use this number in
paragraph (h) of this AD; or
    (ii) If through the logbook check you cannot positively
determine the number of hours on the A/C compressor motor brushes as
specified in the paragraph above, you must use the number of hours
on the A/C compressor hour meter to comply with the requirements of
this AD or presume the brushes have over 500 hours TIS and use this
number in paragraph (h) of this AD.

(h) Replacement

    At the later of the times specified in paragraph (h)(1) and
(h)(2) of this AD, using the hour reading on the A/C compressor hour
meter determined in paragraph (g) of this AD, replace the A/C
compressor motor brushes with new brushes. Thereafter, repeat the
replacement of the A/C compressor motor brushes no later than every
500 hours TIS on the A/C compressor motor. Do the replacement
following Cessna Aircraft Company Model 525 Maintenance Manual,
Revision 23, dated July 1, 2012.
    (1) Before or when the A/C compressor motor brushes reach a
total of 500 hours TIS; or
    (2) Before further flight after the inspection required in
paragraph (g) of this AD.

(i) Deactivation

    (1) In lieu of replacing the A/C compressor motor brushes,
before or when the A/C compressor motor brushes reach a total of 500
hours TIS, you may deactivate the A/C. Pull the vapor cycle A/C
circuit breaker, install a placard by the A/C selection switch
prohibiting use of the vapor cycle air conditioner, and document
deactivation of the system in the aircraft logbook referring to this
AD as the reason for deactivation. While the system is deactivated,
aircraft operators must remain aware of operating temperature
limitations as detailed in the specific airplane flight manual.
    (2) If you choose to deactivate the system and then later choose
to return the A/C to service: Before returning the A/C system to

service and removing the placard, you must apply the inspection and
replacement requirements of the brushes as specified in paragraph
(g) and (h) of this AD.

(j) Return of Replaced Parts and Reporting Requirement

    For the first two A/C compressor motor brush replacement cycles
on each aircraft, within 30 days after the replacement or within 30
days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later,
send the brushes that were removed to Cessna Aircraft Company,
Cessna Service Parts and Programs, 7121 Southwest Boulevard,
Wichita, KS 67215. Provide the following information with the
brushes:
    (1) The Model and S/N of the airplane;
    (2) P/N of Motor;
    (3) P/N of the brushes, if known;
    (4) The elapsed amount of motor hours since the last brush/motor
replacement, if known;
    (5) If motor hours are unknown, report the elapsed airplane
flight hours since the last brush/motor replacement and indicate
that motor hours are unknown; and
    (6) Number of motor hours currently displayed on the pallet hour
meter.

(k) Special Flight Permit

    Special flight permits are permitted with the following
limitation: Operation of the A/C system is prohibited.

(l) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to
the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

(m) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the
person identified in the Related Information section of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(n) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Christine Abraham,
Aerospace Engineer, Wichita ACO, FAA, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 16, 2012.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2012-20694 Filed 8-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 26609]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10269]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-77720; File No. SR-OCC-2016-004]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation;
Notice of Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on
Proposed Rule Change Related to the Adoption of an Options Exchange
Risk Control Standards Policy

April 27, 2016.
    On March 4, 2016, The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to adopt a new
Options Exchange Risk Control Standards Policy and revise OCC's
Schedule of Fees to charge and collect from Clearing Members a fee of
two cents per each cleared options contract (per side) executed on an
options exchange that did not demonstrate sufficient risk controls
designed to meet the proposed set of principles-based risk control
standards. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on March 18, 2016.\3\ To date, the Commission has
received 6 comment letters on the proposal.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. OCC also filed this proposal as an advance
notice pursuant to Section 802(e)(1) of the Payment, Clearing, and
Settlement Supervision Act of 2010 and Rule 19b-4(n)(1) under the
Exchange Act. 15 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1) and 17 CFR 240.19b-4(n)(1). See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-77628 (April 15, 2016), 81 FR
23536 (April 21, 2016) (SR-OCC-2016-801). To date, the Commission
has not received any comments on the advance notice.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-77358 (March 14,
2016), 81 FR 14921 (March 18, 2016) (File No. SR-OCC-2016-004).
    \4\ See Letters from Mark Dehnert, Managing Director, Goldman
Sachs & Co., and Kyle Czepiel, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Goldman
Sachs Execution & Clearing, L.P., dated March 28, 2016, to
Secretary, Commission; Lisa J. Fall, President, BOX Options
Exchange, dated April 6, 2016, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
Commission; James G. Lundy, Associate General Counsel, ABN AMRO
Clearing Chicago LLC, dated April 8, 2016, to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Commission; Ellen Greene, Managing Director, Securities
Industry and Financial Markets Association, dated April 12, 2016, to
Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary, Commission; Michael J. Simon,
Secretary and General Counsel, International Securities Exchange,
LLC, dated April 20, 2016, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
Commission; and Edward T. Tilly, Chief Executive Officer, Chicago
Board Options Exchange, Inc., dated April 20, 2016, to Brent J.
Fields, Secretary, Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \5\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding, or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day from the publication of notice of filing of this proposed rule
change is May 2, 2016. The Commission is extending this 45-day time
period. In order to provide the Commission with sufficient time to
consider the proposed rule change, the Commission finds it is
appropriate to designate a longer period within which to take action on
the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\6\ designates June 16, 2016, as the date by which the Commission
should either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-
OCC-2016-004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-10269 Filed 5-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: July 9, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 130)]
[Notices]
[Page 32917-32918]
[DOCID:fr09jy09-67]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2008-0372; FRL-8928-9]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; NSPS for Petroleum Dry Cleaners
(Renewal); EPA ICR Number 0997.09, OMB Control Number 2060-0079

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR which is abstracted below describes the
nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before August 10,
2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-OECA-
2008-0372, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), or by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency, Enforcement and
Compliance Docket and Information Center, mail code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB at: Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sounjay Gairola, Office of Enforcement
and Compliance Assurance, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202)
564-4003; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On May 30, 2008 (73 FR 31088), EPA sought comments on this ICR
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any additional
comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days
of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OECA-2008-0372, which is available for public viewing
online at http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The
EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number
for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether

submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public
viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, as EPA receives them and without
change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, confidential
business information (CBI), or other information whose public
disclosure is restricted by statute. For further information about the
electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov.
    Title: NSPS for Petroleum Dry Cleaners (Renewal)
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 0997.09, OMB Control Number 2060-0079.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on August 31, 2009.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Petroleum
Dry Cleaners (40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJ) were proposed on December
14, 1982, promulgated on September 24, 1984, and amended on October 17,
2000 (65 FR 61773).
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of the
NSPS at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A and any changes, or additions to the
General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJ.
    Owners or operators of the affected facilities must make an initial
notification, performance tests, periodic reports, and maintain records
of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction
in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which
the monitoring system is inoperative. Reports, at a minimum, are
required semiannually.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 22
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Petroleum dry cleaners.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 18.
    Frequency of Response: Initially.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 1,664.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $134,355 in labor costs exclusively.
There are no annualized capital/startup costs or O&M costs associated
with this ICR.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is no change in the total estimated
burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR
Burdens. Apparent differences of less than 500 hours are attributable
to rounding; in previous years, hours were rounded to the nearest
thousand; this ICR presents more exact figures.

    Dated: July 2, 2009.
John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E9-16267 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Dear Mr. Zeller:

I am writing as an individual consumer to request an extension of the comment period for the Food and Drug Administration's ("FDA") Proposed Rule Deeming Tobacco Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking and Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the "Proposed Rule") published at 79 Fed. Reg. 23,142 and Federal Register No. 2014-09491. On behalf of myself, I am requesting that the comment period for the Proposed Rule be extended by the FDA for an additional 105 days, from its current 75-day period, to 180 days.

I feel very strongly about e-cigarettes as an alternative to combustible cigarettes. That is an understatement. They have saved many of my friend's lives, and the company I work for now employs 25 people within its first year. That number will be growing, and regulating e-cigarettes to death will put a lot of people out of jobs around the country. I realize that the FDA has the authority under 21 CFR 10.40 to extend this time frame and that the FDA has exercised this authority on numerous occasions in the past. Please do so, you'll make a lot of former smokers happy.

Let me know what you think, I know y'all are getting overwhelmed with letters from angry former smokers. I never smoked cigarettes regularly, so I can speak with less emotion about it than most users whose lives vaping has saved.


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 190 (Friday, September 30, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 67342]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23679]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP16-472-000; PF15-33-000]

Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review of the Northern Lights 2017 Expansion Project

    On June 25, 2016, Northern Natural Gas Company (Northern) filed an
application in Docket No. CP16-472-000 requesting a Certificate of
Public Convenience and Necessity pursuant to Section 7(c) of the
Natural Gas Act to construct and operate certain natural gas pipeline
facilities. The proposed project is known as the Northern Lights 2017
Expansion Project (Project), and would expand the capacity of
Northern's market area facilities in Minnesota.
    On July 8, 2016, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission or FERC) issued its Notice of Application for the Project.
Among other things, that notice alerted agencies issuing federal
authorizations of the requirement to complete all necessary reviews and
to reach a final decision on a request for a federal authorization
within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Project. This instant notice
identifies the FERC staff's planned schedule for the completion of the
EA for the Project.

Schedule for Environmental Review

Issuance of EA--November 9, 2016
90-day Federal Authorization Decision Deadline--February 7, 2017

    If a schedule change becomes necessary, additional notice will be
provided so that the relevant agencies are kept informed of the
Project's progress.

Project Description

    The proposed Project includes 2 miles of 8-inch-diameter pipeline
loop in Sherburne County, Minnesota; 2.8 miles of 12-inch-diameter
pipeline loop in Isanti County, Minnesota; as well as an additional
15,900-horsepower compression unit at Northern's existing Faribault
Compressor Station in Rice County, Minnesota. The Project would allow
Northern to transport an incremental load of approximately 76,000
dekatherms per day.

Background

    On April 11, 2016, the Commission issued a Notice of Intent to
Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Planned Northern Lights
2017 Expansion Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues
(NOI). The NOI was issued during the pre-filing review of the Project
in Docket No. PF15-33-000 and was sent to affected landowners; federal,
state, and local government agencies; elected officials; environmental
and public interest groups; Native American tribes; other interested
parties; and local libraries and newspapers. In response to the NOI,
the Commission received comments from the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources (MN DNR) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA). The primary issue raised by the MN DNR was a request to describe
potential impacts to the Rum River and any associated mitigation
measures. The primary issues raised by the EPA were requests to address
a range of specific environmental issues of concern in pipeline
construction.

Additional Information

    In order to receive notification of the issuance of the EA and to
keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in specific dockets,
the Commission offers a free service called eSubscription. This can
reduce the amount of time you spend researching proceedings by
automatically providing you with notification of these filings,
document summaries, and direct links to the documents. Go to
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.
    Additional information about the Project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs at (866) 208-FERC or on the
FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov). Using the ``eLibrary'' link, select
``General Search'' from the eLibrary menu, enter the selected date
range and ``Docket Number'' excluding the last three digits (i.e.,
CP16-472), and follow the instructions. For assistance with access to
eLibrary, the helpline can be reached at<PHONE_NUMBER>, TTY (202) 502-
8659, or at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The eLibrary link on the FERC
Web site also provides access to the texts of formal documents issued
by the Commission, such as orders, notices, and rule makings.

    Dated: September 26, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-23679 Filed 9-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 1, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 40)]
[Notices]
[Page 10491-10492]
[DOCID:fr01mr06-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings No. 1

February 22, 2006.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings.

    Docket Numbers: ER00-3039-001.
    Applicants: Exeter Energy Limited Partnership.
    Description: Exeter Energy L.P. submits the revised triennial
generation market power analysis.
    Filed Date: 2/10/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060221-0083.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, March 3, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER03-447-003.
    Applicants: Black Oak Energy, LLC.
    Description: Black Oak Energy, LLC submits its triennial updated
market analysis requesting authority to engage in wholesale electric
power & energy

transactions pursuant to FERC's 2/10/05 Order 652.
    Filed Date: 2/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060216-0028.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 6, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-918-002.
    Applicants: Western Massachusetts Electric Company.
    Description: Northeast Utilities Services Co submits a letter
agreement between NUSCO and Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy
Cooperative.
    Filed Date: 2/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060216-0025.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 6, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-288-001.
    Applicants: Northeast Utilities Service Company.
    Description: Northeast Utilities Service Co submits a letter
agreement between NUSCO and Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy
Cooperative.
    Filed Date: 2/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060216-0026.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 6, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-439-000.
    Applicants: Otter Tail Power Company.
    Description: Otter Tail Power Co submits an amendment to the
Interconnection and Transmission Service Agreement with Minnkota Power
Cooperative, Inc.
    Filed Date: 2/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060213-5048.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 6, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-631-000.
    Applicants: Mountainview Power Company, LLC.
    Description: Mountainview Power Co, LLC submits support for an
updated cost of capital for use in billings under the Power Purchase
Agreement with Southern California Edison Co.
    Filed Date: 2/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060216-0147.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 6, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-632-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Co submits an amended
Service Agreement for Wholesale Distribution Service with the City of
Riverside, CA.
    Filed Date: 2/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060216-0035.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 6, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-633-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: PJM Interconnection LLC submits an executed
interconnection service agreement with Casselman Windpower LLC and
Pennsylvania Electric Co.
    Filed Date: 2/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060216-0036.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 6, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-634-000.
    Applicants: Spruance Genco, LLC.
    Description: Spruance Genco, LLC's petition for order accepting
market-based rate tariff for filing and granting waivers and blanket
approvals.
    Filed Date: 2/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060216-0032.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 6, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-635-000.
    Applicants: Edgecombe Genco, LLC.
    Description: Petition of Edgecombe Genco, LLC for Order accepting
market-based rate tariff for filing and granting waviers and blanket
approvals.
    Filed Date: 2/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060216-0031.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 6, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-636-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Nevada Power Co submits a Notice of Cancellation of an
Agreement for Long-Term Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service with
Pinnacle West Energy Corp.
    Filed Date: 2/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060216-0149.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 6, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER97-3428-009.
    Applicants: Tri-Valley Corporation.
    Description: Tri-Valley Corp's amended and updated market power
analysis and Revised First Original Sheet 1 et al., First Revised
Volume 1 related to its market-based rate authorization.
    Filed Date: 2/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060216-0027.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 6, 2006.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-2860 Filed 2-28-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: July 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 126)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 38064-38066]
[DOCID:fr01jy10-27]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0643; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-030-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    The landing gear alternate extension system in the cockpit is
accessible through an access panel located on the cockpit floor.
There have been reports of failure of the access panel latch
assembly as a consequence of repeated closure of the access panel
involving the use of excessive force. Failure of the latch assembly
can result in the access panel being jammed in the closed position,
and require mechanical prying to open.
    An undetected or uncorrected latch failure condition in the
access panel can prevent immediate access to the landing gear
alternate extension system by the flight crew during an emergency. *
* *

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 16, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com.
You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig Yates, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0643;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-030-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We have lengthened the 30-day comment period for proposed ADs that
address MCAI originated by aviation authorities of other countries to
provide adequate time for interested parties to submit comments. The
comment period for these proposed ADs is now typically 45 days, which
is consistent with the comment period for domestic transport ADs.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2009-46, dated December 14, 2009 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:

    The landing gear alternate extension system in the cockpit is
accessible through an access panel located on the cockpit floor.
There have been reports of failure of the access panel latch
assembly as a consequence of repeated closure of the access panel
involving the use of excessive force. Failure of the latch assembly
can result in the access panel being jammed in the closed position,
and require mechanical prying to open.
    An undetected or uncorrected latch failure condition in the
access panel can prevent immediate access to the landing gear
alternate extension system by the flight crew during an emergency.
This Directive requires the replacement of the existing latch
assembly with a stronger modified latch assembly.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Bombardier, Inc. has issued Service Bulletin 8-32-166, Revision A,
dated January 29, 2009; and Service Bulletin 84-32-57, Revision A,
dated June 15, 2009. The actions described in this service information
are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 198 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 3 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $815 per product. Where the
service information lists required parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these costs.
As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $211,860, or $1,070 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2010-0643; Directorate Identifier
2010-NM-030-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by August 16, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to the airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category.
    (1) Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-101, -102, -103, -106, -201, -
202, -301, -311, and -315 airplanes, serial numbers 003 through 658
inclusive.
    (2) Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400, -401, -402 airplanes,
serial numbers 4001, 4003, 4004, 4006, and 4008 through 4187
inclusive.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
gear.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    The landing gear alternate extension system in the cockpit is
accessible through an access panel located on the cockpit floor.
There have been reports of failure of the access panel latch
assembly as a consequence of repeated closure of the access panel
involving the use of excessive force. Failure of the latch assembly
can result in the access panel being jammed in the closed position,
and require mechanical prying to open.
    An undetected or uncorrected latch failure condition in the
access panel can prevent immediate access to the landing gear
alternate extension system by the flight crew during an emergency. *
* *

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Actions

    (g) Within 6,000 flight hours or 36 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever comes first: Replace the latch assembly
of the access panel for the alternate extension system for the
landing gear with a modified latch assembly, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-32-166,
Revision A, dated January 29, 2009 (for Model DHC-8-100, DHC-8-200,
and DHC-8-300 series airplanes); or Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-
32-57, Revision A, dated June 15, 2009 (for Model DHC-8-400 series
airplanes).

Actions Accomplished According to Previous Issue of Service Bulletin

    (h) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD
according to Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-32-166, dated April 14,
2008; or Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-57, dated April 30, 2008;
as applicable; are considered acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding actions specified in this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (i) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office, ANE-170, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York, 11590; telephone 516-228-
7300; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal
maintenance inspector

(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or
lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (j) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2009-46,
dated December 14, 2009; Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-32-166,
Revision A, dated January 29, 2009; and Bombardier Service Bulletin
84-32-57, Revision A, dated June 15, 2009; for related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 23, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-15983 Filed 6-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P