[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 13 (Thursday, January 21, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3334-3336]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01015]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0464; FRL-9939-78-Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Wisconsin State Board Requirements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing
approval of state implementation plan (SIP) submissions from Wisconsin
regarding the state board requirements under section 128 of the Clean
Air Act (CAA). EPA is also approving elements of SIP submissions from
Wisconsin regarding the infrastructure requirements of section 110,
relating to state boards for the 1997 ozone, 1997 fine particulate
(PM2.5), 2006 PM2.5, 2008 lead (Pb), 2008 ozone,
2010 nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and 2010 sulfur dioxide
(SO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The
proposed rulemaking associated with this final action was published on
September 11, 2015, and EPA received no comments during the comment
period, which ended on October 13, 2015.

DATES: This final rule is effective on February 22, 2016.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0464. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Eric Svingen,
Environmental Engineer, at<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting the Region 5
office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Svingen, Environmental Engineer,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. What is the background of these SIP submissions?
II. What guidance is EPA using to evaluate these SIP submissions?
III. What is the result of EPA's review of these SIP submissions?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What is the background of these SIP submissions?

    This rulemaking addresses submissions from the Wisconsin Department
of Natural Resources (WDNR) dated July 2, 2015. These

submissions are intended to address CAA requirements relating to the
state board requirements under section 128, as well as infrastructure
requirements of section 110, relating to state boards for the 1997
ozone, 1997 PM2.5, 2006 PM2.5, 2008 Pb, 2008
ozone, 2010 NO2, and 2010 SO2 NAAQS.
    The requirement for states to make infrastructure SIP submissions
arises out of CAA section 110(a)(1). Pursuant to section 110(a)(1),
states must make SIP submissions ``within 3 years (or such shorter
period as the Administrator may prescribe) after the promulgation of a
national primary ambient air quality standard (or any revision
thereof),'' and these SIP submissions are to provide for the
``implementation, maintenance, and enforcement'' of such NAAQS. The
statute directly imposes on states the duty to make these SIP
submissions, and the requirement to make the submissions is not
conditioned upon EPA's taking any action other than promulgating a new
or revised NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2) includes a list of specific
elements that ``[e]ach such plan'' submission must address.
    EPA has historically referred to these SIP submissions made for the
purpose of satisfying the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(1) and (2)
as ``infrastructure SIP'' submissions. Although the term
``infrastructure SIP'' does not appear in the CAA, EPA uses the term to
distinguish this particular type of SIP submission from submissions
that are intended to satisfy other SIP requirements under the CAA. This
specific rulemaking is only taking action on the CAA 110(a)(2)(E)(ii)
element of these infrastructure SIP requirements, which is the only
infrastructure SIP element addressed in WDNR's submittal dated July 2,
2015.

II. What guidance is EPA using to evaluate these SIP submissions?

    EPA's guidance for these submissions is highlighted in an October
2, 2007, guidance document entitled ``Guidance on SIP Elements Required
Under Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 1997 8-hour Ozone and
PM2.5 \1\ National Ambient Air Quality Standards'' (2007
Guidance). Further guidance is provided in a September 13, 2013,
document entitled ``Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation
Plan (SIP) Elements under CAA Sections 110(a)(1) and (2)'' (2013
Guidance).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ PM2.5 refers to particles with an aerodynamic
diameter of less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers, oftentimes
referred to as ``fine'' particles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. What is the result of EPA's review of these SIP submissions?

    Pursuant to section 110(a), states must provide reasonable notice
and opportunity for public hearing for all infrastructure SIP
submissions. WDNR provided notice of a public comment period on May 9,
2015, held a public hearing at WDNR State Headquarters on June 9, 2015,
and closed the public comment period on June 11, 2015. No comments were
received.
    Wisconsin provided a detailed synopsis of how various components of
its SIP meet each of the applicable requirements in section 128 and
110(a)(2)(E)(ii) for the 1997 ozone, 1997 PM2.5, 2006
PM2.5, 2008 Pb, 2008 ozone, 2010 NO2, and 2010
SO2 NAAQS, as applicable.
    On September 11, 2015 (80 FR 54744), EPA published a proposed rule
that would approve these submissions into Wisconsin's SIP. This
proposed rule contained a detailed evaluation of how Wisconsin's
submissions satisfy certain requirements under CAA sections 110 and
128. No comments were received. Therefore, EPA is finalizing this rule
as proposed.

IV. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is taking final action to incorporate Wis. Stats. 15.05,
19.45(2), and 19.46 into Wisconsin's SIP. EPA is further approving
these submissions as meeting CAA obligations under section 128, as well
as 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) for the 1997 ozone, 1997 PM2.5, 2006
PM2.5, 2008 Pb, 2008 ozone, 2010 NO2, and 2010
SO2 NAAQS.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Wisconsin
Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
generally available electronically through www.regulations.gov and/or
in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section
of this preamble for more information).

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the

Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this action and other required information
to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the
rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not
a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by March 21, 2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides.

    Dated: November 23, 2015.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. Section 52.2570 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(134) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.2570  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (134) On July 2, 2015, the Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources submitted a request to revise the State Implementation Plan
to satisfy the state board requirements under section 128 of the Clean
Air Act.
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) Wisconsin Statutes, section 15.05 Secretaries, as revised by
2013 Wisconsin Act 20, enacted on June 30, 2013. (A copy of 2013
Wisconsin Act 20 is attached to section 15.05 to verify the enactment
date.)
    (B) Wisconsin Statutes, section 19.45(2), as revised by 1989
Wisconsin Act 338, enacted on April 27, 1990. (A copy of 1989 Wisconsin
Act 338 is attached to section 19.45(2) to verify the enactment date.)
    (C) Wisconsin Statutes, section 19.46 Conflict of interest
prohibited; exception, as revised by 2007 Wisconsin Act 1, enacted on
February 2, 2007. (A copy of 2007 Wisconsin Act 1 is attached to
section 19.46 to verify the enactment date.)

0
3. Section 52.2591 is amended by adding paragraph (j) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.2591  Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements.

* * * * *
    (j) Approval--In a July 2, 2015, submission, Wisconsin certified
that the state has satisfied the infrastructure SIP requirements of
section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) for the 1997 ozone, 1997 PM2.5,
2006 PM2.5, 2008 Pb, 2008 ozone, 2010 NO2, and
2010 SO2 NAAQS.

[FR Doc. 2016-01015 Filed 1-20-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: January 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 2)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 224-226]
[DOCID:fr05ja10-3]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0785; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-125-AD;
Amendment 39-16163; AD 2010-01-06]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. (Type Certificate
Previously Held by de Havilland, Inc.) Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    There has been one case reported of failure of a shaft
(tailstock) on an elevator Power Control Unit (PCU), Part Number (P/
N)<PHONE_NUMBER>. Continued actuation of the affected PCU caused
damage to the surrounding structure. * * *
    Each elevator surface has three PCUs, powered by separate
independent hydraulic systems, and a single elevator PCU shaft
failure may remain dormant. Such a dormant loss of redundancy,
coupled with the potential for a failed shaft to produce collateral
damage, including damage to hydraulic lines, could possibly affect
the controllability of the aircraft.
* * * * *

We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective February 9, 2010.
    On June 26, 2009 (74 FR 27686, June 11, 2009), the Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in this AD.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on September 4, 2009
(74 FR 45787), and proposed to supersede AD 2009-12-13, Amendment 39-
15936 (74 FR 27686, June 11, 2009). That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified products.
    When we issued AD 2009-12-13, the eventual replacement of all
elevator power control units identified in paragraph (f)(1) of that AD
was not required. We have now determined that further rulemaking is
necessary for this action, and this AD follows from that determination.
We are mandating the optional terminating action in paragraph (f)(3) of
AD 2009-12-13 in this AD. You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Explanation of Change to Alternative Method of Compliance Paragraph

    We have updated paragraph (h)(1) of this AD to provide the
appropriate contact information to use when submitting requests for
approval of an alternative method of compliance (AMOC).

Explanation of Changes Made to This AD

    We have revised this AD to identify the legal name of the
manufacturer as published in the most recent type certificate data
sheet for the affected airplane models.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD with the changes described
previously. We determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a Note within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect about 61 products of U.S.
registry.
    The actions that are required by AD 2009-12-13 and retained in this
AD take about 3 work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of $80
per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the
currently required actions is $240 per product.
    We estimate that it will take about 13 work-hours per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this AD. The average labor
rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $0 per
product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that
are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the
U.S. operators to be $63,440, or $1,040 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15936 (74 FR
27686, June 11, 2009) and adding the following new AD:

2010-01-06 Bombardier, Inc. (Type Certificate Previously Held by de
Havilland, Inc.): Amendment 39-16163. Docket No. FAA-2009-0785;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-125-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective February
9, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2009-12-13, Amendment 39-15936.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. (Type Certificate
previously held by de Havilland, Inc.) Model DHC-8-400, DHC-8-401,
and DHC-8-402 airplanes, certificated in any category, serial
numbers 4135 through 4149 inclusive.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
Controls.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    There has been one case reported of failure of a shaft
(tailstock) on an elevator Power Control Unit (PCU), Part Number (P/
N)<PHONE_NUMBER>. Continued actuation of the affected PCU caused
damage to the surrounding structure. Subsequent investigation
determined that the failure was the result of a material defect and
that the shafts installed on a total of 88 suspect PCUs * * * may
contain a similar defect.
    Each elevator surface has three PCUs, powered by separate
independent hydraulic systems, and a single elevator PCU shaft
failure may remain dormant. Such a dormant loss of redundancy,
coupled with the potential for a failed shaft to produce collateral
damage, including damage to hydraulic lines, could possibly affect
the controllability of the aircraft.
    This directive mandates an identification check for elevator PCU
serial numbers, a daily check for correct operation of all suspect
PCUs and, finally, replacement of all suspect PCUs.

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2009-12-13, Without Optional
Terminating Action:

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 30 days after June 26, 2009 (the effective date of AD
2009-12-13), inspect the serial number of each of the six installed
elevator PCUs having P/N<PHONE_NUMBER>. If one or more of the six
installed elevator PCUs, P/N<PHONE_NUMBER>, have any of the PCU serial
numbers 238, 698, 783 through 788 inclusive, 790, 793, 795, 802,
806, 807, 810, 820 through 823 inclusive, 826 through 828 inclusive,
831, 835, 838, 840, 886 through 889 inclusive, or 898 through 955
inclusive; without a suffix ``A'' after the serial number: Within 30
days after June 26, 2009, perform a check for the correct operation
of all installed elevator PCUs in accordance with the procedures
detailed in Appendix A, B, or C of Bombardier Q400 All Operator
Message 217B, dated April 26, 2007. Repeat the check thereafter
before the first flight of each day until the replacement specified
in paragraph (g) of this AD is done. The checks in Appendices A and
B of Bombardier Q400 All Operator Message 217B, dated April 26,
2007, must be performed by the flight crew, while the check
specified in Appendix C of the all operator message must be
performed by certificated maintenance personnel.

    Note 1:  Suffix ``A'' after the serial number indicates that the
PCU has already passed a magnetic particle inspection and is cleared
for continued use.

    (2) If incorrect operation of any elevator PCU is found during
any check required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before further
flight, replace the elevator PCU with a PCU, P/N<PHONE_NUMBER>, having
a serial number not specified in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD; or
with a PCU, P/N<PHONE_NUMBER>, having the suffix ``A'' after the
serial number; in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-32, Revision A, dated January 18,
2008.
    (3) Actions accomplished before June 26, 2009, according to
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-32, dated May 1, 2007, are
considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding action
specified in this AD.

New Requirements of This AD

Actions and Compliance

    (g) Unless already done, within 2,000 flight hours or 12 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, replace
all PCUs, P/N<PHONE_NUMBER>, having a serial number specified in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, and not having suffix ``A'' after the
serial number, with PCUs, P/N<PHONE_NUMBER>, having a serial number
not specified in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD; or with PCUs, P/N
390600-1007, having the suffix ``A'' after the serial number; in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-27-32, Revision A, dated January 18, 2008. This
action terminates the requirements of paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office, ANE-170, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to ensure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (i) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2009-16,
dated April 20, 2009; Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-32, Revision
A, dated January 18, 2008; and Bombardier Q400 All Operator Message
217B, dated April 26, 2007; for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (j) You must use Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-32, Revision
A, dated January 18, 2008; and Bombardier Q400 All Operator Message
217B, dated April 26, 2007; as applicable; to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the
incorporation by reference of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-32,
Revision A, dated January 18, 2008; and Bombardier Q400 All Operator
Message 217B, dated April 26, 2007; on June 26, 2009 (74 FR 27686,
June 11, 2009).
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://
www.bombardier.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 23, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-31136 Filed 1-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        0DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on April 23, 2004

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2003-14701

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:   Linea Aerea de Navegacion Dominicana, S.A. (Lan Dominicana)
  Date Filed:  March 30, 2004

Relief requested:  Renew exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 41301 to engage in
scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail (1)
between Santo Domingo and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, on the one
hand, and Miami and New York, on the other hand; and (2) between Santo
Domingo, Dominican Republic, on the one hand, and San Juan, Puerto Rico,
on the other hand.  The applicant would conduct these services only by
wet leasing aircraft from Linea Aerea Nacional Chile, S.A. (Lan Chile).

Date and citation of last action:  April 1, 2003, in this docket

Applicant representative:  Marshall S. Sinick<PHONE_NUMBER> & Charles
F. Donley II<PHONE_NUMBER>

DOT Analyst:  Gordon H. Bingham<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  None filed

	DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved									Action date:  April 23, 2004

Effective dates of authority granted:  April 23, 2004-April 23, 2005

Basis for approval (bilateral agreement/reciprocity):  July 22, 1986 Air
Transport Agreement between the United States and the Dominican Republic

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the
terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

X  Standard exemption conditions (attached)

Special conditions/Partial grant/Denial basis/Remarks:  Lan Dominicana
may not conduct U.S. operations with its own aircraft and crews without
further order of the Department.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) the applicant was qualified to perform the
proposed operations; (2) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (3) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (4) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted/deferred/dismissed, we denied all requests in
the referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR §
385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date of
issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and the
filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

Foreign Carrier Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the foreign carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Not conduct any operations unless it holds a currently effective
authorization from its homeland for such operations, and it has filed a
copy of such authorization with the Department;

(2)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, including, but not limited to, 14 CFR Parts 129, 91, and
36, and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning
security.  To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government
requirements concerning security, the holder shall, before commencing
any new service (including charter flights) from a foreign airport that
would be the holder’s last point of departure for the United States,
contact its Principal Security Inspector (PSI) to advise the PSI of its
plans and to find out whether the Transportation Security Administration
has determined that security is adequate to allow such airport(s) to be
served;

(3)  Comply with the requirements for minimum insurance coverage
contained in 14 CFR Part 205, and, prior to the commencement of any
operations under this authority, file evidence of such coverage, in the
form of a completed OST Form 6411, with the Federal Aviation
Administration’s Program Management Branch (AFS-260), Flight Standards
Service (any changes to, or termination of, insurance also shall be
filed with that office);

(4)  Not operate aircraft under this authority unless it complies with
operational safety requirements at least equivalent to Annex 6 of the
Chicago Convention;

(5)  Conform to the airworthiness and airman competency requirements of
its Government for international air services;

(6)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 203,
concerning waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(7)  Agree that operations under this authority constitute a waiver of
sovereign immunity, for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1605(a), but only with
respect to those actions or proceedings instituted against it in any
court or other tribunal in the United States that are: (a)  based on its
operations in international air transportation that, according to the
contract of carriage, include a point in the United States as a point of
origin, point of destination, or agreed stopping place, or for which the
contract of carriage was purchased in the United States; or (b)  based
on a claim under any international agreement or treaty cognizable in any
court or other tribunal of the United States.  In this condition, the
term "international air transportation" means "international
transportation" as defined by the Warsaw Convention, except that all
States shall be considered to be High Contracting Parties for the
purpose of this definition;

(8)  Except as specifically authorized by the Department, originate or
terminate all flights to/from the United States in its homeland;

(9)  Comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 217, concerning the
reporting of scheduled, nonscheduled, and charter data;

(10) If charter operations are authorized, except as otherwise provided
in the applicable aviation agreement, comply with the Department's rules
governing charters (including 14 CFR Parts 212 and 380); and

(11) Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department, with all applicable orders or regulations of other U.S.
agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the United States.

This authority shall not be effective during any period when the holder
is not in compliance with the conditions imposed above.  Moreover, this
authority cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without explicit
Department approval under Title 49 of the U.S. Code.

  The Dominican Republic is currently a Category 2 country under the
FAA’s International Aviation Safety Assessment Program (IASA).


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 44 (Monday, March 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10539-10541]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4763]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61620; File No. SR-DTC-2010-04]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Depository Trust Company;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Modify Its Registered Transfer Agent Notification Methods for
Assumption or Termination of Services

March 1, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on February 3, 2010, The
Depository Trust Company (``DTC'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and

III below, which Items have been prepared primarily by DTC. DTC filed
the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \2\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(4) \3\ thereunder so that the proposal was effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to modify the registered
transfer agent notification methods for assumption or termination of
services.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, DTC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. DTC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A),
(B) and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries
prepared by DTC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    Rule 17Ad-16 under the Act is designed to help reduce delays in
securities transfers. The rule requires registered transfer agents to
notify the appropriate qualified registered securities depository when
the transfer agent assumes or terminates services on behalf of an
issuer or when the transfer agent changes its name or address.
    In 1995, DTC filed a proposed rule change with the Commission in
which DTC requested designation as the appropriate qualified registered
securities depository for purposes of Rule 17Ad-16 and also sought
approval of its procedures to receive and transmit such notices. The
Commission approved the rule filing and ordered that DTC be designated
as the appropriate qualified registered securities depository.\5\
Existing DTC Procedures allow transfer agents to provide their notices
to DTC by e-mail to DTC's Transfer Agent Services Mailbox, by fax, or
by mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Securities Exchange Release Act No. 35378 (February 15,
1995), 60 FR 9875 (February 22, 1995) (File No. SR-DTC-95-02).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To increase certainty regarding where transfer agents should direct
these notices to DTC, as well as to reduce costs and administrative
burdens, DTC proposes modifying its Procedures so that registered
transfer agents would only notify DTC by sending e-mails to DTC's
Transfer Agent Services Mailbox. The proposed changes to DTC's
Procedures can be found in Exhibit 5 to proposed rule change SR-DTC-
2010-04 at http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/rule_filings/2010/dtc/2010-04.pdf
    DTC believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act \6\ and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to DTC because the proposed rule
change promotes efficiencies in the clearance and settlement of
securities transactions by modifying DTC's Procedures to expedite the
notification process for transfer agent changes and decrease transfer
delays.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    DTC does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any
impact or impose any burden on competition.

(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not yet
been solicited or received. DTC will notify the Commission of any
written comments received by DTC.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(4) \8\ thereunder
because the proposed rule change effects a change in an existing
service of a registered clearing agency that: (i) Does not adversely
affect the safeguarding of securities or funds in the custody or
control of the clearing agency or for which it is responsible and (ii)
does not significantly affect the respective rights or obligations of
the clearing agency or persons using the service. At any time within
sixty days of the filing of such rule change, the Commission may
summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Electronic comments may be submitted by using the
Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml), or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-DTC-2010-04 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-DTC-2010-04. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filings also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of DTC and on DTC's Web
site at http://www.dtcc.com/legal/rule_filings/dtc/2010.php.
    All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All

submissions should refer to file number SR-DTC-2010-04 and should be
submitted on or before March 29, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-4763 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47317]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21865]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2017-0097]

Notice of Application for Approval To Discontinue or Modify a
Railroad Signal System

    Under part 235 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
and 49 U.S.C. 20502(a), this provides the public notice that on August
2#, 2017, Norfolk Southern Corporation (NS) petitioned the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) seeking approval to discontinue or modify
a signal system. FRA assigned the petition Docket Number FRA-2017-0097.
    Applicant: Norfolk Southern Corporation, Mr. B.L. Sykes, Chief
Engineer C&S Engineering, 1200 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, GA 30309.
    NS seeks to discontinue control point (CP) East End Avenue on the
CNO&TP District at milepost (MP) 337.2, Central Division, Chattanooga,
TN.
    CP East End Avenue will be removed from service. All associated
signal equipment, existing power switches, movable point frogs and slip
switches will be retired or converted to hand operation. Zero track is
currently governed by Rule 261. Cavalier and AGS #2 track will become
yard leads and be governed under Yard Limit Rule 93. AGS #1 will be
renamed Main #2 and CNO&TPO Main will be renamed Main #1; both will
remain governed by Rule 261.
    NS states the reason for proposed change is as part of the
rationalization, reconfiguration, and implementation of positive train
control through the Chattanooga, TN, area between CP Pratt and CP 23rd
Street.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations
Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested parties
desire an opportunity for oral comment and a public hearing, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
    Communications received by November 27, 2017 will be considered by
FRA before final action is taken. Comments received after that date
will be considered if practicable.
    Anyone can search the electronic form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better
inform its processes. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/
ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See also https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice for the
privacy notice of regulations.gov.

Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-21865 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


MEMORANDUM

TO:		Brian D’Amico, USEPA/OW/OST/EAD

FROM:	Mary Willett, ERG

		Cortney Itle, ERG

DATE:	August 29, 2008

SUBJECT:	Meeting with BioKleen Technologies Representatives on August 7,
2007

On August 7, 2007 EPA and ERG met with BioKleen representatives to
obtain information from BioKleen concerning their wastewater treatment
technology.  Attendees at the meeting included:

Brian D’Amico, EPA

Eric Strassler, EPA

Mary Willett, ERG

Cortney Itle, ERG

Kennard Sy, BioKleen

Thomas Hickey, Advanced Aeration

The following topics were discussed:

Overview of the Wastewater Treatment Technology by BioKleen

Dr. Sy provided a presentation on BioKleen’s aeration wastewater
treatment technology.

Some of the main topics/points made during the presentation included the
following:

BioKleen’s Vacuum Bubble® aerators address BOD and waste treatment
problems by improving the performance of aerobic bacteria.  The
treatment process makes additional oxygen readily available by creating
large populations of very small bubbles (0.25 mm) under a partial
vacuum.  The Vacuum Bubble Technology® (VBT) increases the potential of
oxygen transfer as the small  bubbles remain in the water longer.  This
technology is used in BioKleen’s Deployable Aerobic Aqueous Bioreactor
(DAAB).

The DAAB treatment unit creates a biofilm that resides on a fabric
substrate.  The DAAB is capable of treating 25,000 gal/day of septic
system wastewater.  Currently 2,300 DAAB treatment units operate at
dairies and municipalities (sludge treatment).  For municipal wastes,
the operational cost for the system is $0.10/gallon.

Application of Technology to Deicing Stormwater

Dr. Sy discussed the application of the BioKleen aeration wastewater
treatment technology to deicing stormwater.  The discussion is
summarized below.

1.	Laboratory tests on 1% to 8% propylene glycol wastewater achieved 95%
reduction in the concentration of propylene glycol.  BioKleen is working
to increase the propylene glycol concentration in the tests.  BioKleen
acclimates bacteria for propylene glycol wastewater in the laboratory.

2.	The maximum treatment capacity of the technology for deicing
stormwater applications is unknown.  The small footprint of the unit
would allow adding it to a frac tank.

3.	A pilot test of the technology is planned at Newark airport.

Memorandum

1 August 2008

Page   PAGE  2

  FILENAME \p  P:\Airport Deicing\Meeting Notes\EPA_Industry Meeting
Notes\Meeting_BioKleen_080707.doc


[Federal Register: March 21, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 54)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 13167-13168]
[DOCID:fr21mr07-3]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 158

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2004-0387; FRL-8112-6]
RIN 2070-AC12

Pesticides; Data Requirements for Conventional Chemicals; Final
rule; Notification to the Secretary of Agriculture

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notification to the Secretary of Agriculture.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document notifies the public that the Administrator of
EPA has forwarded to the Secretary of Agriculture a draft final rule as
required by section 25(a) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). As described in the Agency's semi-annual
Regulatory Agenda, the draft final rule updates the data requirements
in 40 CFR part 158 for the registration of conventional pesticide
products. Besides providing the regulated community with clearer and
more transparent information, the updated data requirements will
enhance the development of health and environmental data to conduct
scientifically sound chemical/hazard risk assessments to protect human
health and the environment.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2004-0387. All documents in the
docket are listed on the regulations.gov web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov
, or, if only available in hard copy, at the Office

of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vera Au, Field and External Affairs
Division (7506P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington DC 20460-
0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. It simply
announces the submission of a draft final rule to the U. S. Department
of Agriculture (USDA) and does not otherwise affect any specific
entities. This action may, however, be of particular interest to a
producer or registrant of a pesticide product, including agricultural,
residential, and industrial, but not including antimicrobial
pesticides, biochemical pesticides, or microbial pesticides. This
action may also affect any person or company who might petition the
Agency for new tolerances, hold a pesticide registration with existing
tolerances, or any person or company who is interested in obtaining or
retaining a tolerance in the absence of a registration, that is, an
import tolerance. This latter group may include pesticide manufacturers
or formulators, importers of food, grower groups, or any person or
company who seeks a tolerance. Since other entities may also be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be interested in this action. If you have any
questions regarding this action, consult the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document and Other
Related Information?

    In addition to using regulations.gov, you may access this Federal
Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the
``Federal Register'' listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.

II. What Action is EPA Taking?

    Section 25(a)(2) of FIFRA requires the Administrator to provide the
Secretary of Agriculture with a copy of any final regulation at least
30 days before signing it for publication in the Federal Register. The
draft final rule is not available to the public until after it has been
signed by EPA. If the Secretary comments in writing regarding the draft
final rule within 15 days after receiving it, the Administrator shall
include the comments of the Secretary, if requested by the Secretary,
and the Administrator's response to those comments in the final rule
when published in the Federal Register. If the Secretary does not
comment in writing within 15 days after receiving the draft final rule,
the Administrator may sign the final rule for publication in the
Federal Register anytime after the 15-day period.

III. Do Any Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Apply to this
Notification?

    No. This document is not a rule, it is merely a notification of
submission to the Secretary of Agriculture. As such, none of the
regulatory assessment requirements apply to this document.

IV. Will this Notification be Subject to the Congressional Review Act?

    No. This action is not a rule for purposes of the Congressional
Review Act (CRA), 5 U.S.C. 804(3), and will not be submitted to
Congress and the Comptroller General. EPA will submit the final rule to
Congress and the Comptroller General as required by the CRA.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 158

    Environmental protection, Confidential business information,
Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: January 30, 2007.
James Jones,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E7-5162 Filed 3-20-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 30, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 59617]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20751]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG16-140-000.
    Applicants: Astra Wind LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of EG of Astra Wind LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/22/16.
    Accession Number: 20160822-5275.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/12/16.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2453-000.
    Applicants: Brady Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Brady Interconnection, LLC
Application for market-Based Rates to be effective 10/18/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/19/16.
    Accession Number: 20160819-5300.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/9/16.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
reliability filings:

    Docket Numbers: RR16-6-000.
    Applicants: North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
    Description: Request of the North American Electric Reliability
Corporation for Acceptance of its 2017 Business Plan and Budget.
    Filed Date: 8/23/16.
    Accession Number: 20160823-5166.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/16.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 24, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-20751 Filed 8-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: July 16, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 137)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 40715-40719]
[DOCID:fr16jy08-1]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-28058; Directorate Identifier 2007-NE-08-AD;
Amendment 39-15610; AD 2008-14-15]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; International Aero Engines AG (IAE)
V2500 Series Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for IAE
V2500-A1, V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2527-A5, V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5, V2530-A5,
V2533-A5, V2525-D5, and V2528-D5 turbofan engines. This AD requires
removing certain No. 4 bearing oil system components from service at
the next shop visit or by an end date determined by the engine model.
This AD results from instances of oil loss from the No. 4 bearing
compartment. We are issuing this AD to prevent heat damage to high-
pressure turbine (HPT) and low-pressure turbine (LPT) critical life
limited hardware such as the HPT stage 1-2 airseal. Damage to the HPT
stage 1-2 airseal could cause uncontained engine failure and damage to
the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective August 20, 2008.

ADDRESSES: The Docket Operations office is located at Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-
0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Riley, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39
with a proposed AD. The proposed AD applies to IAE V2500-A1, V2522-A5,
V2524-A5, V2527-A5, V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5, V2530-A5, V2533-A5, V2525-D5,
and V2528-D5 turbofan engines. We published the proposed AD in the
Federal Register on July 9, 2007 (72 FR 37126). That action proposed to
require removing certain No. 4 bearing oil system components from
service at the next shop visit or by an end date determined by the
engine model.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

Comments

    We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comments received.

Requests To Change Compliance Schedule

    Three commenters, Air Transport Association, United Airlines, and
Jet Blue Airways ask that we change the compliance:
     To require removing the parts only when they access the
No. 4 bearing compartment, or
     For engines that don't require access to the No. 4 bearing
compartment at the next shop visit, to permit them to defer removing
the parts to the subsequent shop visit, but not later than June 30,
2011.
    The commenters state that changing the compliance times will avoid
an undue burden of forcing every engine visit to access the No. 4
bearing compartment and will avoid aircraft-on-ground situations due to
lack of spare parts.
    We don't agree. We developed the compliance requirements to
maintain an acceptable level of safety for the entire V2500 fleet.
Revising the compliance requirements will result in having to
accelerate the program in order to maintain the same level of safety.
That will most likely have an adverse impact on the fleet, due to
forcing additional engine removals. The engine manufacturer, IAE, has
also stated that a sufficient supply of spare parts exists to handle
incorporation within the compliance requirements of the AD, including
unexpected shop visit situations. However, operators who have special
conditions may propose alternate compliance schedules, if they can show
that the alternate compliance schedules provide an acceptable level of
safety. We didn't change the AD.

Request To Address Design Deficiencies in the HPT Stage 1-2 Airseal

    One commenter, Jet Blue Airways, asks us to revise the AD to
address design deficiencies in the HPT Stage 1-2 airseal as a
contributor to HPT distress, rather than attributing the root cause of
all HPT Stage 1-2 airseal distress to oil in the turbine. The commenter
states that one of the reported ``confirmed instances of oil loss'' in
the turbine is inaccurate. One investigation, which was categorized as
an ``oil in turbine'' event, revealed no substantive evidence of oil
loss in the turbine, or thermal oil ignition that could have caused the
dimensional defects in the HPT Stage 1-2 airseal. It is not beyond
reasonable speculation that, of the remaining 23 events, some
percentage was incorrectly stated as related to ``No. 4 bearing
compartment oil loss.''
    We don't agree. We have been involved in the manufacturer's
Engineering Investigations for each of the subject ``oil in turbine''
(OIT) events, and agree with the manufacturer's conclusions. Due to the
operating conditions surrounding the No. 4 bearing compartment, it can
be extremely difficult, following engine operation, to detect either
evidence of oil loss, or thermo oil ignition. The investigation
concluded that the HPT Stage 1-2 airseal distress experienced is a
result of thermo oil ignition and not due to design deficiencies in the
HPT

Stage 1-2 airseal. The investigation also concluded that measurement of
specific HPT Stage 1-2 airseal dimensions is a reliable method of
determining if oil ignition has occurred. We did not change the AD.

Request To Eliminate the Requirement To Incorporate ``OIT Package 2''

    The same commenter, Jet Blue, asks us to revise the AD to eliminate
the requirement to incorporate the ``OIT Package 2'' for compliance.
The ``OIT Package 2'' includes mainly external hardware revisions to
eliminate ``oil traps'' in the oil scavenge tubes for the No. 4 bearing
compartment that may adversely impact oil scavenge capability. The
commenter states ``To our knowledge, no V2527-A5 engine incorporating
the modification standards of `OIT Package' have been found with the
reported defects or suspected of No. 4 bearing compartment loss.''
    We don't agree. We have reviewed the results of the Engineering
Investigation of the No. 4 bearing compartment oil loss events, and
agree with the manufacturer's conclusions that all hardware identified
in Tables 1, 2, and 3 of this AD contribute to the root cause of
insufficient oil scavenging from the No. 4 bearing compartment. We
didn't change the AD.

Request To Revise the NPRM To State a Significant Economic Impact

    The same commenter, Jet Blue, asks us to revise the AD to state
that the proposed rule would have a significant economic impact. The
commenter states that the modification would cost more than $8,000,000
for its fleet.
    We don't agree. In order for us to categorize an AD as a
``significant economic impact'' to operators, the total cost of the AD
must exceed $100,000,000 per year. We based our economic assessment for
this AD on actual hardware replacement cost (using the manufacturer's
spare parts pricing), the estimated number of work-hours (at $80 per
hour) required to comply with the AD, and the estimated number of shop
visits per year. Based on those figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD to U.S. operators to be $45,037,165 per year, which is
below the $100,000,000 threshold criterion. We didn't change the AD.

Request To Incorporate IAE Service Bulletin V2500-ENG-72-0541 Into the
AD

    The same commenter, Jet Blue Airways, requests that we revise the
AD to incorporate IAE Service Bulletin (SB) V2500-ENG-72-0541 into the
AD. The commenter states that tracking all of the individual parts
listed in the AD, especially from parts that are not serialized, is
cumbersome and beyond reasonable and customary standards.
    We don't agree. Due to the complexity of the various IAE SBs, we
determined that it would be clearer to list in the AD, only the parts
that operators must remove from service. We list IAE SB V2500-ENG-72-
0541 in the Related Information section of the AD. That SB provides
specific instructions and the current replacement part information.
Listing only the parts that the operators must remove from service also
provides operators with increased flexibility for installing other
approved parts not listed in the IAE SB. However, we have added a
statement in the Compliance section of the AD that states ``If you have
accomplished IAE Service Bulletin V2500-ENG-72-0541, Revision 4, dated
March 12, 2008, you have complied with this AD.''

Request To Correct Certain Information in the AD

    One commenter, IAE, asks us to correct certain information in the
Compliance section of the AD.
    We agree. We have:
     Corrected the part number (P/N) for the Seal Assembly, No.
4 Bearing, Front, in Table 2 of the AD, from P/N 2A0853 to P/N 2A2055.
     Deleted P/N 2A0830-01, Tube, Scavenge, No. 4 Bearing Assy,
from Table 2 of the AD.
     Deleted P/N 2A1949-01, Tube, Scavenge, No. 4 Bearing Assy,
from Table 2 of the AD.
     Deleted P/N 5R8111, Tube A/O Oil, No. 4 Bearing Scav Dif
Case to Bif Panel, from Table 2 of the AD.
     Added paragraph (j) for V2525-D5 and V2528-D5 engines
stating that with HPT stage 1 rotor assembly, P/Ns 2A9521-002 and
2A9621-002, the stage 1 HPT hub metering plug, P/N 2A3182, does not
need to be removed.
     Replaced IAE Service Bulletin V2500-ENG-72-0541, Revision
1, dated February 26, 2007, in the Related Information paragraph, with
IAE Service Bulletin V2500-ENG-72-0541, Revision 4, dated March 12,
2008.

Conclusion

    We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously.
We have determined that these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 686 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. Of those 686 engines, the operators of
nineteen V2500-A1 engines, thirty -A5 engines and twenty-one -D5
engines have already complied with the requirements in this AD.

                                  Costs of Compliance per Year by Engine Model
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Number of   Total labor   Total parts
                        Engine model                         engines per    cost per     cost per     Total cost
                                                                 year         year         year        per year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
V2500-A1...................................................           33     $355,080    $7,230,564   $7,585,644
V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2527-A5, V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5, V2530-           142    1,368,880    35,790,816   37,159,696
 A5, V2533-A5..............................................
V2525-D5, V2528-D5.........................................            5       15,400       276,425      291,825
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost of this AD to
U.S. operators to be $45,037,165 per year.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority

because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD and
placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary at the
address listed under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2008-14-15 International Aero Engines AG (IAE): Amendment 39-15610.
Docket No. FAA-2007-28058; Directorate Identifier 2007-NE-08-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August
20, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to IAE V2500-A1, V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2527-
A5, V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5, V2530-A5, V2533-A5, V2525-D5, and V2528-D5
turbofan engines with a part listed by part number (P/N) in this AD
installed. These engines are installed on, but not limited to,
Airbus A319, A320, A321, and McDonnell Douglas MD-90 airplanes.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from instances of oil loss from the No. 4
bearing compartment. We are issuing this AD to prevent heat damage
to high-pressure turbine (HPT) and low-pressure turbine (LPT)
critical life limited hardware such as the HPT stage 1-2 airseal.
Damage to the HPT stage 1-2 airseal could cause uncontained engine
failure and damage to the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.

V2500-A1 Engines

    (f) For V2500-A1 engines, remove the parts listed by P/N in the
following Table 1 of this AD at the next shop visit after the
effective date of this AD but not later than November 30, 2008. The
ATA chapter reference of the IAE V2500-A1 engine manual (E-V2500-
1IA) contains information on removing the parts.

                                                         Table 1.--V2500-A1 Parts To Be Removed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          ATA chapter reference                         P/N                                                Nomenclature
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72-42-20.................................  2A0367-01...................  Tube Assy of, Weep, No. 4 Bearing Outer.
72-42-20.................................  2A2873-01...................  Tube Assy of, Weep, No. 4 Bearing Outer.
72-42-20.................................  2A0830-01...................  Tube, Scavenge, No. 4 Bearing Assy.
72-42-20.................................  2A1949-01...................  Tube, Scavenge, No. 4 Bearing Assy.
72-42-20.................................  2A2028-01...................  Tube, Scavenge, No. 4 Bearing Assy.
72-42-20.................................  2A0830-001..................  Tube, Scavenge, No. 4 Bearing Assy.
72-42-20.................................  2A2274-01...................  Tube, Scavenge, No. 4 Bearing Assy.
72-42-33.................................  2A0853......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-33.................................  2A2055......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-33.................................  2A2834......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-33.................................  2A2930......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-33.................................  2A3525......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-33.................................  2A3538......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-33.................................  2A0851......................  Support Assy, No. 4 Bearing Seal.
72-42-33.................................  2A2833......................  Support, No. 4 Bearing, Seal Assy.
72-42-33.................................  2A3537......................  Support, No. 4 Bearing Seal Assy.
72-42-35.................................  2A0892-01...................  Duct Assy, Cooling Air, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-35.................................  2A2257-01...................  Duct Assy, Cooling Air, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-43-20.................................  2A2056......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-43-20.................................  2A2931......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-43-20.................................  2A3526......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-43-20.................................  2A0847......................  Seal Ring Holder.
72-43-20.................................  2A0891-01...................  Duct Assy, Cooling Air, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-43-20.................................  2A1205-01...................  Duct Assy, Cooling Air, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-43-20.................................  2A3078-01...................  Duct Assy, Cooling Air, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-45-11.................................  2A0594......................  Metering Plug, HPT Hub, Stage 1.
72-45-11.................................  2A1040......................  Metering Plug, HPT Hub, Stage 1.
72-45-11.................................  2A2181......................  Metering Plug, HPT Hub, Stage 1.
72-45-13.................................  2A0884......................  Seal Air, HPT Stage 1.
72-45-13.................................  2A1203......................  Seal Air, HPT Stage 1.
72-45-13.................................  2A0884-001..................  Seal Air, HPT Stage 1.
79-22-49.................................  5R8111......................  Tube A/O Oil--No. 4 Brg Scav Dif Case to Bif Panel.
79-22-49.................................  5R8138......................  Tube A/O Oil--No. 4 Brg Scav Dif Case to Bif Panel.
79-22-49.................................  6A5367......................  Tube A/O Oil--No. 4 Brg Scav Dif Case to Bif Panel.

79-22-49.................................  5A9083......................  Tube A/O Oil--No. 4 Brg Discon to Discon.
79-22-49.................................  5A9084......................  Tube A/O Oil--No. 4 Brg Discon to Scav Valve.
79-22-49.................................  5A8573......................  Tube A/O Oil--Press `T' To Pressure Transducer.
79-23-51.................................  1648MK2.....................  Scavenge Valve.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2527-A5, V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5, V2530-A5, and
V2533-A5 Engines

    (g) For V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2527-A5, V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5,
V2530-A5, and V2533-A5 engines, remove the parts listed by P/N in
the following Table 2 of this AD at the next shop visit after the
effective date of this AD but not later than June 30, 2011. The ATA
chapter reference of the IAE V2500-A5 engine manual (E-V2500-1IA)
contains information on removing the parts.

                        Table 2.--V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2527-A5, V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5, V2530-A5, and V2533-A5 Parts To Be Removed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          ATA chapter reference                         P/N                                                Nomenclature
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72-42-20.................................  2A0367-01...................  Tube Assy of, Weep, No. 4 Bearing Outer.
72-42-20.................................  2A2873-01...................  Tube Assy of, Weep, No. 4 Bearing Outer.
72-42-33.................................  2A2055......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-33.................................  2A2834......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-33.................................  2A2930......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-33.................................  2A3525......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-33.................................  2A3538......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-33.................................  2A0851......................  Support Assy, No. 4 Bearing Seal.
72-42-33.................................  2A2833......................  Support, No. 4 Bearing, Seal Assy.
72-42-33.................................  2A3537......................  Support, No. 4 Bearing Seal Assy.
72-42-35.................................  2A0892-01...................  Duct Assy, Cooling Air, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-35.................................  2A2257-01...................  Duct Assy, Cooling Air, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-43-20.................................  2A2056......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-43-20.................................  2A2931......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-43-20.................................  2A3526......................  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-43-20.................................  2A0847......................  Seal Ring Holder.
72-43-20.................................  2A0891-01...................  Duct Assy, Cooling Air, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-43-20.................................  2A1205-01...................  Duct Assy, Cooling Air, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-43-20.................................  2A3078-01...................  Duct Assy, Cooling Air, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-45-11.................................  2A0594......................  Metering Plug, HPT Hub, Stage 1.
72-45-11.................................  2A1040......................  Metering Plug, HPT Hub, Stage 1.
72-45-11.................................  2A2354......................  Metering Plug, HPT Hub, Stage 1.
72-45-11.................................  2A3182......................  Metering Plug, HPT Hub, Stage 1.
72-45-13.................................  2A1352......................  Seal Air, HPT Stage 1.
72-45-13.................................  2A3032......................  Seal Air, HPT Stage 1.
79-22-49.................................  5R8138......................  Tube A/O Oil--No. 4 Brg Scav Dif Case to Bif Panel.
79-22-49.................................  6A5367......................  Tube A/O Oil--No. 4 Brg Scav Dif Case to Bif Panel.
79-22-49.................................  5A9083......................  Tube A/O Oil--No. 4 Brg Discon to Discon.
79-22-49.................................  5A9084......................  Tube A/O Oil--No. 4 Brg Discon to Scav Valve.
79-22-49.................................  5A8573......................  Tube A/O Oil--Press `T' To Pressure Transducer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (h) For V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2527-A5, V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5,
V2530-A5, and V2533-A5 engines with HPT stage 1 rotor assembly, P/Ns
2A9521-002 and 2A9621-002, the stage 1 HPT hub metering plug, P/N
2A3182, does not need to be removed.

V2525-D5 and V2528-D5 Engines

    (i) For V2525-D5 and V2528-D5 engines, remove the parts listed
by P/N in the following Table 3 of this AD at the next shop visit
after the effective date of this AD but not later than June 30,
2011. The ATA chapter reference of the IAE V2500-D5 engine manual
(E-V2500-3IA) contains information on removing the parts.

                               Table 3.--V2525-D5 and V2528-D5 Parts To Be Removed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ATA chapter reference             P/N                                  Nomenclature
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72-42-20......................  2A0367-01........  Tube Assy of, Weep, No. 4 Bearing Outer.
72-42-20......................  2A2873-01........  Tube Assy of, Weep, No. 4 Bearing Outer.
72-42-33......................  2A0851...........  Support Assy, No. 4 Bearing Seal.
72-42-33......................  2A2833...........  Support, No. 4 Bearing, Seal Assy.
72-42-33......................  2A3537...........  Support, No. 4 Bearing Seal Assy.
72-42-33......................  2A2834...........  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-33......................  2A2930...........  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-33......................  2A3525...........  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-33......................  2A3538...........  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Front.
72-42-35......................  2A2257-01........  Duct Assy, Cooling Air, No. 4 Bearing, Front.

72-43-20......................  2A2056...........  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-43-20......................  2A2931...........  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-43-20......................  2A3526...........  Seal Assy, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-43-20......................  2A0847...........  Seal Ring Holder.
72-43-20......................  2A1205-01........  Duct Assy, Cooling Air, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-43-20......................  2A3078-01........  Duct Assy, Cooling Air, No. 4 Bearing, Rear.
72-45-11......................  2A3182...........  Metering Plug, HPT Hub, Stage 1.
72-45-11......................  2A2354...........  Metering Plug, HPT Hub, Stage 1.
72-45-13......................  2A1352...........  Seal Air, HPT Stage 1.
72-45-13......................  2A3032...........  Seal Air, HPT Stage 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (j) For V2525-D5 and V2528-D5 engines with HPT stage 1 rotor
assembly, P/Ns 2A9521-002 and 2A9621-002, the stage 1 HPT hub
metering plug, P/N 2A3182, does not need to be removed.

Previous Credit

    (k) If you have accomplished IAE Service Bulletin V2500-ENG-72-
0541, Revision 4, dated March 12, 2008, you have complied with this
AD.
    (l) After the effective date of this AD, do not install any part
that has a P/N listed in this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

    (m) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, has the authority
to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

Related Information

    (n) International Aero Engines Service Bulletin No. V2500-ENG-
72-0541, Revision 4, dated March 12, 2008, pertains to the subject
of this AD.
    (o) Contact Mark Riley, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
(781) 238-7199, for more information about this AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (p) None.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on July 2, 2008.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-15686 Filed 7-15-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P