From:
BATTEN, KATIE M<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Thursday, January 12, 2017 5:07 PM
To:
Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Robert Brager<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Seidman, Emily<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:
Kakade, Seema<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
RE: SunCoke CAA 114 Request - Meeting Follow Up - EPA response

Donna Lee,

Thank you for your response.  SunCoke has reviewed the information you provided below.  We think this testing scope is acceptable and plan to do the bypass vent stack testing at the Granite City facility in May and are working to schedule the other testing at Haverhill.  Unless we hear otherwise from you, we will do the quench water testing at Haverhill at the same time as the other testing.  Doing so would be consistent with your statement that water testing is required, but inconsistent with your statement in number 4 below that quench water testing being conducted at the same facility and in the same time period as air emissions testing, if air emissions testing is required.  As we have previously stated, we cannot safely conduct quench air emissions testing in a way that would yield accurate, representative data.

We are proceeding with developing a test plan and will send the plan back to you within the next three weeks.  We ask that you review it quickly so we can move forward with preparing to conduct the testing.  We may have questions on the testing as we develop the plan and will request a conference call to discuss, if needed.

Hope you had a great Holiday!

Thanks,

Katie Batten
Corporate Environmental Manager

 off:<PHONE_NUMBER>
 cell:<PHONE_NUMBER>

From: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 6:47 PM
To: BATTEN, KATIE M; Robert Brager; Seidman, Emily
Cc: Kakade, Seema
Subject: Re: SunCoke CAA 114 Request - Meeting Follow Up - EPA response

Katie,

Thank you for providing the previous test reports that were discussed at our September 15, 2016, meeting. The test reports were very helpful to our evaluation of SunCoke's request to amend the testing requirements for the Coke Oven ICR.

We have considered your requested changes to the testing requests as described in your letters and during our meetings.  After consulting with various EPA experts, the following are our decisions on SunCoke's requests to reduce the burden of the ICR:

 Metals Testing
 We will accept reduced Method 29 (metals) tests of one (1) dscm sample volume for all Method 29 tests in the ICR instead of 3 dscm.
 Dioxin and PAH Testing
 We will accept (new) test data for dioxin&furans at the main stack in lieu of (new) tests for dioxin&furans during pushing.
 We are retaining the dioxin&furan/PAH sample volume of 4 dscm for all PAH and dioxin&furan tests (as combined tests or separate).
 We cannot allow for a reduction in dioxin&furan sample volume based on the data provided to EPA because the dioxin&furan fingerprint (after the HRSG) in these data was limited to mainly two congener species (HPCDD and OCDD) that have low emissions (TEQ); we cannot allow for reduction in PAH sample volume because we have no data for PAHs on which to base a decision since the previous test reports did not include PAH testing. Therefore, we must retain the minimum sample volume of 4 dscm for the dioxin&furan and PAH tests, either separately or combined.
 Note that we are retaining the PAH test volume of 4 dscm during pushing even though we are accepting the (new) dioxin&furan tests at the main stack in lieu of (new) dioxin&furan tests during pushing for the reasons described above.
 Number of Facilities Conducting Testing
 We will accept testing at SunCoke's Haverhill facility as the only SunCoke facility to perform the complete set of source tests in Enclosure 2 of the 2016 ICR. However, we may need to require additional testing at another SunCoke facility in the future if the data obtained from the entire coke industry in response to the 2016 Section 114 requests indicate that EPA needs additional data to complete our statutory obligations under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act.
 In the test data SunCoke provided, Haverhill had the highest HAP emissions compared to the other two SunCoke facilities. We plan to use Haverhill's data for the other four SunCoke facilities for risk assessment purposes. We plan to scale Haverhill's data to each of the other SunCoke facilities using lb/ton emission values from the Haverhill tests and each facility's production level.
 We are retaining the requirement for emissions testing of a HRSG by-pass vent at one facility.  However, we are providing flexibility as to which facility and the timing of such testing (as long as it is completed in year 2017). For example, the testing of the HRSG by-pass vent could be done at the Gateway facility or Middletown facility during an HRSG outage in year 2017. This testing of the HRSG by-pass vent must include all of the tests specified for the by-pass vent in the April 2016 Section 114 Request, except that the "Filterable PM & HAP Metals" test (i.e., Method 29) can be done with a sample volume of 1 dscm for each run instead of 3 dscm, as described above. Also, one Filterable PM & Metals test series (i.e., Method 29 with three runs, using a minimum of 1 dscm sample volume for each run) must be done during pushing at the same facility (Middletown or Gateway) simultaneously with the by-pass testing in order to "benchmark" the data from the by-pass vent to what we will receive from Haverhill for the other HAP emission sources.
 Quench Tower Air Emissions Tests
 We are delaying a decision on quench tower air emissions testing at SunCoke pending further EPA considerations.  If we decide to require quench tower testing, we plan to allow quench tower air tests be done at any of SunCoke's four heat recovery facilities.
 We are retaining the Section 114 requirement for Suncoke to test quench water samples. Quench water testing should be done at the same facility as quench air emissions testing (if we decide to require such air emissions testing) and in the same time period, as described in the 2016 ICR; if we decide that quench air emissions testing is not required for SunCoke, quench water testing should be done at Haverhill along with the other tests required in the ICR
I hope this response is helpful to Suncoke.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.


Proposed Information Collection Request; Water Quality Standards Program (Renewal): Response to Public Comments

      This document provides EPA's response to comments on Proposed Information Collection Request:  Water Quality Standards Program (Renewal), 83 FR 27981 (June 15, 2018).

      The brief synopses of comments in this document are provided for the convenience of the reader and are not meant to replace the full comments. In developing responses, EPA considered the full comments received, which are available individually in the docket for this rulemaking, and by clicking the links in this document. To access the docket, go to www.regulations.gov, enter "EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0465" in the Search box, and click on "Open Docket Folder." Individual comments are accessible by selecting "View All" next to "Comments".

Contents

Comment ID
Commenter
                                     Page
                                     0015
Anonymous
                                       2
                                     0016
Anonymous
                                       2
                                     0017
Anonymous
                                       2
                                     0018
Anonymous
                                       2
                                     0019
Anonymous
                                       3
                                     0020
K. Deem
                                       3
                                     0021
Anonymous
                                       3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment ID EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0465-0015
Author Name: Anonymous
Organization: Unstated
Expresses concerns about air and water pollution monitoring in China, India, and Mexico City.
Response:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This comment is beyond the scope of the Notice and does not provide any views or information relevant to the proposed Information Collection Request (ICR). For these reasons, it was not considered in developing the ICR.
Comment ID EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0465-0016
Author Name: Anonymous
Organization: Unstated
Urges regulation of big city air and water pollution.
Response:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This comment is beyond the scope of the Notice and does not provide any views or information relevant to the proposed ICR. For these reasons, it was not considered in developing the ICR.
Comment ID EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0465-0017
Author Name: Anonymous
Organization: Unstated
Urges regulation of big city air and water pollution.
Response:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This comment is beyond the scope of the Notice and does not provide any views or information relevant to the proposed ICR. For these reasons, it was not considered in developing the ICR.
Comment ID EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0465-0018
Author Name: Anonymous
Organization: Unstated
Expresses concern about the impact of California wildfires on the atmosphere and urges actions to address the problem.
Response:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This comment is beyond the scope of the Notice and does not provide any views or information relevant to the proposed ICR. For these reasons, it was not considered in developing the ICR.
Comment ID EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0465-0019
Author Name: Anonymous
Organization: Unstated
Urges improved forest management practices in California to mitigate forest fires.

Response:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This comment is beyond the scope of the Notice and does not provide any views or information relevant to the proposed ICR. For these reasons, it was not considered in developing the ICR.
Comment ID EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0465-0020
Author Name: Kayla Deem
Organization: Unstated
Expresses concern about the relationship between water quality at an Air Force base in Michigan and occurrence of liver ailments.

Response:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This comment is beyond the scope of the Notice and does not provide any views or information relevant to the proposed ICR. For these reasons, it was not considered in developing the ICR.
Comment ID EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0465-0021
Author Name: Anonymous
Organization: Unstated
Expresses concern about Ryan Zinke's views on management of private (sic) lands such as national parks.

Response:
This comment is beyond the scope of the Notice and does not provide any views or information relevant to the proposed ICR. For these reasons, it was not considered in developing the ICR.


[Federal Register: December 28, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 247)]
[Notices]
[Page 68653-68655]
[DOCID:fr28de09-103]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61203; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2009-108]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Codify Certain Provisions of the Options Listing Procedures Plan Into
the Exchange's Rules

December 18, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on December 7, 2009, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by Nasdaq. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NASDAQ is filing a proposal for the NASDAQ Options Market (``NOM''
or ``Exchange'') [sic] amend its Chapter IV, Section 6 (Series of
Options Contracts Open for Trading) to apply uniform objective
standards to the range of options series exercise (or strike) prices
available for trading on the Exchange.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available from Nasdaq's Web
site at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at Nasdaq's principal office,
and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposal is to implement in NOM rules,
specifically Chapter IV, Section 6, changes that were recently made to
the Plan for the Purpose of Developing and Implementing Procedures
Designated to Facilitate the Listing and Trading of Standardized
Options Submitted Pursuant to Section 11A(a)(3)(B) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, also known as the Options Listing Procedures Plan
(``OLPP''), in Amendment No. 3 thereto.\3\ The proposed rule change
incorporates uniform objective standards to the range of options series
exercise (or strike) prices available for trading on the Exchange, as a
quote mitigation strategy intended to reduce the overall number of
option series available for trading, which will in turn lessen the rate
of increase in quote traffic (``range limitations'' or ``range
limitation strategy'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60531 (August 19,
2009), 74 FR 43173 (August 26, 2009) (order approving Amendment No.
3 to the OLPP, which would apply uniform objective standards to the
range of options series exercise or strike prices available for
trading on exchanges that are sponsors of OLPP). The sponsors of
OLPP include NASDAQ, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated;
International Stock Exchange LLC; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; NASDAQ OMX
Phlx, Inc.; NYSE Amex, LLC; and NYSE Arca, Inc. (together known as
the ``Plan Sponsor Exchanges''). The OLPP is a national market
system plan that, among other things, sets forth procedures
governing the listing of new options series and replaces and
supersedes the Joint-Exchange Options Plan (``JEOP''). See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44521 (July 6, 2009), 66 FR
36809 (July 13, 2001) (order approving OLPP). See also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 29698 (September 17, 1991), 56 FR 48954
(September 25, 1991) (order approving JEOP).
    \4\ The Exchange expects that other Plan Sponsor Exchanges will
file similar rule change proposals implementing range limitations in
their rules to mitigate quotes. See, for example, Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 60995 (November 13, 2009), 74 FR 60008
(November 19, 2009) (SR-CBOE-2009-084) (notice of filing and
immediate effectiveness).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Chapter IV, Section 6 currently indicates what series of option
contracts may be open for trading after a particular class of options
has been approved for trading on the Exchange. This proposal adds
Supplementary Material .09 to Section 6 that applies certain ``range
limitations'' to the addition of new series for options classes
overlying equity securities, Exchange Traded Funds (``ETFs''), or Trust
Issued Receipts (``TIRs'').
    As proposed in Supplementary Material .09 to Section 6, if the
price of the underlying security is less than or equal to $20, the
Exchange would not list new option series with an exercise price more
than 100 percent above or below the price of the underlying
security.\5\ If the price of the underlying security is greater than
$20, the Exchange would not list new option series with an exercise
price more than 50 percent above or below the price of the underlying
security. The proposal provides for an objective basis upon which the
underlying prices for the price range limitations described above shall
be determined, specifically in regard to intra-day add-on series and
next-day series additions, new expiration months and for option series
to be added as a result of pre-market trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ This restriction would not prohibit the listing of at least
three options series per expiration month in an option class.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposal also allows the Exchange to designate up to five
underlying securities to which, instead of the aforementioned 50
percent restriction, a 100 percent restriction would apply. These
designations would be made on an annual basis and cannot be removed
during the calendar year unless the option class is delisted by the
Exchange, in which case the Exchange may designate another class to
replace the delisted class. If a designated class

is delisted by the Exchange but continues to trade on at least one
other exchange, any additional series for the class which are added
from that point forward would again be subject to the proposed exercise
price range limitations, unless the class is subsequently designated by
another exchange. The proposal also provides a procedure for the
Exchange to request, if conditions warrant, additional case-by-case
exceptions even when it has already so designated five underlying
securities.
    In addition, the Exchange may request, on a case-by-case basis, an
exemption when it desires to list a series from the 100 percent range
limitation. This procedure would enable the Exchange to list options
series with prices that are more than 100 percent above or below the
price of an underlying security, if unanimously agreed upon by all
exchanges that list options overlying the security.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Application of any of the aforementioned exceptions and/or
exemptions to the exercise or strike price range limitations for an
underlying security would be available to all exchanges listing
options on such security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that the proposal would not restrict its ability
to list options series in two situations. First, the Exchange would not
be restricted from listing options series that have been properly
listed by another exchange. And second, the proposal expressly
eliminates the applicability of range limitations with regard to the
listing of $1 strike prices in option classes participating in the $1
Strike Program.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For the $1 Strike Program, see Supplementary Material .02 to
Chapter IV, Section 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change implementing
range limitation strategies for equity, ETF, and TIR options should be
beneficial in reducing quote traffic on the Exchange and in the options
industry.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Exchange's belief regarding reduction of quote traffic
in the options industry is based, as discussed previously, on the
expectation that other options exchanges will file similar rule
change proposals. According to a recent study, if all options
exchanges implement range limitations of the type proposed herein,
the options industry would expect an approximate four percent
reduction in the number of series traded, with only a nominal
reduction in trading volume. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
60531 (August 19, 2009), 74 FR 43173 (August 26, 2009) (order
approving Amendment No. 3 to the OLPP).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \9\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \10\ in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of
a free and open market and a national market system. The Exchange
believes that codifying certain range limitation provisions of the
OLPP, as amended, serves to foster investor protection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange believes that the foregoing proposed rule change may
take effect upon filing with the Commission pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) \11\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder \12\
because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose
any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior
to 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to give the Commission written
notice of the Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change
along with a brief description and the text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of
the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied the pre-filing requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2009-108 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2009-108.
This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is
used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the self-regulatory
organization. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NASDAQ-2009-108 and should be submitted on or before January 19, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-30598 Filed 12-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 12633]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05790]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-82892; File No. 4-698]

Joint Industry Plan; Notice of Withdrawal of Amendment No. 4 to
the National Market System Plan Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail

March 16, 2018.

I. Introduction

    On December 11, 2017, the Operating Committee for CAT NMS, LLC (the
``Company''), on behalf of the parties to the National Market System
Plan Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail (the ``CAT NMS Plan''): BOX
Options Exchange LLC, Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc., Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.,
Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc., Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc., Cboe C2 Exchange,
Inc., Cboe Exchange, Inc., Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., Investors' Exchange LLC, Miami
International Securities Exchange, LLC, MIAX PEARL, LLC, Nasdaq BX,
Inc., Nasdaq GEMX, LLC, Nasdaq ISE, LLC, Nasdaq MRX, LLC, Nasdaq PHLX
LLC, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, New York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE
American, LLC and NYSE Arca, Inc., (the ``Participants'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') pursuant to
Section 11A of the of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 \1\ (the
``Exchange Act'') and Rule 608 thereunder,\2\ Amendment No. 4 to the
CAT NMS Plan to add a fee schedule to the CAT NMS Plan that would set
forth fees to be paid by the Participants to fund the Consolidated
Audit Trail.\3\ A Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Amendment No. 4 was published for comment in the Federal Register on
January 11, 2018.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1.
    \2\ 17 CFR 242.608.
    \3\ See Letter from Michael Simon, Chair, CAT NMS Plan Operating
Committee, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission, dated December
11, 2017.
    \4\ See Exchange Act Release No. 82451 (January 5, 2018), 83 FR
1399 (January 11, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is publishing this notice to reflect that on January
11, 2018, prior to the end of the 60-day period provided for in
Exchange Act Rule 608(b)(iii), the Participants withdrew the
Amendment.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Letter from Michael Simon, Chair, CAT NMS Plan Operating
Committee, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission, dated January
10, 2018.

    By the Commission.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-05790 Filed 3-21-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request U. S. EPA office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance 2. OMB control number b. G None a_ 2060 0019_ __ __ __  __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. G New collection b. X Revision of a currently approved collection c. G Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. X Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. x Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title New Source Performance Standards for Nitric Acid Plants, Subpart G, Part 60 8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) EPA ICR No. 1056.07 9. Keywords Clean Air Act, Air Pollution, Pollution Control 10. Abstract The affected public would be all owners or operators of Nitric Acid Plants facilities. The information gathered would be need to determine which facilities are subject to the regulation and whether they are in compliance with the standards. Reporting is performed on an as needed basis.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. G Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. P Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 35 b. Total annual responses 71 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 0% % c. Total hours requested 1796 d. Current OMB inventory 1516 e. Difference f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 2. Adjustment 280 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs 68 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) 3,500 c. Total annualized cost requested 3,568 d. Current OMB inventory 3268 e. Difference f. Explanation of difference: 2. Adjustment 300 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. P_ Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. X Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. Q Reporting 1. Q On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. xQ Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. Q Other ( describe)

17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes XQ No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Sandi Jones Phone: 202 564 7038 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions 5 CFR 1320.9 reads " As part of the agency submission to OMB of a proposed collection of information, the agency ( through the head of the agency, the Senior Official or their designee) shall certify ( and provide a record supporting such certification) that the proposed collection of information

"( a) is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including that the information to be collected will have practical utility;

"( b) is not unnecessarily duplicative of information otherwise reasonably accessible to the agency;

"( c) reduces to the extent practicable and appropriate the burden on persons who shall provide information to or for the agency, including with respect to small entities, as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U. S. C § 601( 6)), the use of such techniques as:

"( 1) establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to those who are to respond; "( 2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements; or collection of information , or any part thereof; "( 3) an exemption from coverage of the collection of information, or any part thereof;

"( d) is written using plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology and is understandable to those who are to respond;

"( e) is to be implemented in ways consistent and compatible, to the maximum extent practicable, with the existing reporting and recordkeeping practices of those who are to respond;

"( f) indicates for each recordkeeping requirement the length of time persons are required to maintain the records specified;

"( g) informs potential respondents of the information called for under § 1320.8( b)( 3); [ see below]

"( h) has been developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected, including the processing of the information in a manner which shall enhance, where appropriate, the utility of the information to agencies and the public;

"( I) uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology appropriate to the purpose for which the information is to be collected; and "( j) to the maximum extent practicable, uses appropriate information technology to reduce burden and improve data quality, agency efficiency and responsiveness to the public."

NOTE: 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3) requires that each collection of information:

"( 3) informs and provides reasonable notice to the potential persons to whom the collection of information is addressed of: "( I) the reasons the information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( ii) the way such information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( iii) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the average burden of the collection ( together with a request that the public direct to the agency any comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden); "( iv) whether responses to the collection of information are voluntary, required to obtain or retain a benefit ( citing authority), or mandatory ( citing authority); "( v) the nature and extent of confidentiality to be provided, if any ( citing authority); and "( vi) the fact that any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number."

OMB 83 I ( Instructions) 10/ 95


sprayed (dry       D6784-02 (Reapproved
                                 weight basis).     2008) (incorporated
                                                    by reference, see
                                                    Sec.   63.14), over
                                                    the period of the
                                                    initial performance
                                                    test, do not exceed
                                                    8.0 E-05 kg/Mg (1.6
                                                    E-04 lb/ton) of
                                                    first-fire glaze
                                                    sprayed (dry weight
                                                    basis); and
                                                   ii. You establish and
                                                    have a record of the
                                                    operating limits
                                                    listed in Table 2 to
                                                    this subpart over
                                                    the period of the
                                                    initial performance
                                                    test during which Hg
                                                    emissions did not
                                                    exceed 8.0 E-05 kg/
                                                    Mg (1.6 E-04 lb/ton)
                                                    of first-fire glaze
                                                    sprayed (dry weight
                                                    basis).
16. New or reconstructed        a. PM emissions    i. The PM emissions
 sanitaryware manual glaze       must not exceed    measured using
 application.                    2.0 kg/Mg (3.9     Method 5 of 40 CFR
                                 lb/ton) of first-  part 60, appendix A-
                                 fire glaze         3, over the period
                                 sprayed (dry       of the initial
                                 weight basis).     performance test,
                                                    according to the
                                                    calculations in Sec.
                                                      63.8595(f)(2), do
                                                    not exceed 2.0 kg/Mg
                                                    (3.9 lb/ton) of
                                                    first-fire glaze
                                                    sprayed (dry weight
                                                    basis); and
                                                   ii. You establish and
                                                    have a record of the
                                                    operating limits
                                                    listed in Table 2 to
                                                    this subpart over
                                                    the period of the
                                                    initial performance
                                                    test during which PM
                                                    emissions did not
                                                    exceed 2.0 kg/Mg
                                                    (3.9 lb/ton) of
                                                    first-fire glaze
                                                    sprayed (dry weight
                                                    basis).
17. New or reconstructed        a. PM emissions    i. The PM emissions
 sanitaryware spray machine      must not exceed    measured using
 glaze application.              1.6 kg/Mg (3.2     Method 5 of 40 CFR
                                 lb/ton) of first-  part 60, appendix A-
                                 fire glaze         3, over the period
                                 sprayed (dry       of the initial
                                 weight basis).     performance test,
                                                    according to the
                                                    calculations in Sec.
                                                      63.8595(f)(2), do
                                                    not exceed 1.6 kg/Mg
                                                    (3.2 lb/ton) of
                                                    first-fire glaze
                                                    sprayed (dry weight
                                                    basis); and
                                                   ii. You establish and
                                                    have a record of the
                                                    operating limits
                                                    listed in Table 2 to
                                                    this subpart over
                                                    the period of the
                                                    initial performance
                                                    test during which PM
                                                    emissions did not
                                                    exceed 1.6 kg/Mg
                                                    (3.2 lb/ton) of
                                                    first-fire glaze
                                                    sprayed (dry weight
                                                    basis).
18. New or reconstructed        a. PM emissions    i. The PM emissions
 sanitaryware robot glaze        must not exceed    measured using
 application.                    1.2 kg/Mg (2.3     Method 5 of 40 CFR
                                 lb/ton) of first-  part 60, appendix A-
                                 fire glaze         3, over the period
                                 sprayed (dry       of the initial
                                 weight basis).     performance test,
                                                    according to the
                                                    calculations in Sec.
                                                      63.8595(f)(2), do
                                                    not exceed 1.2 kg/Mg
                                                    (2.3 lb/ton) of
                                                    first-fire glaze
                                                    sprayed (dry weight
                                                    basis); and
                                                   ii. You establish and
                                                    have a record of the
                                                    operating limits
                                                    listed in Table 2 to
                                                    this subpart over
                                                    the period of the
                                                    initial performance
                                                    test during which PM
                                                    emissions did not
                                                    exceed 1.2 kg/Mg
                                                    (2.3 lb/ton) of
                                                    first-fire glaze
                                                    sprayed (dry weight
                                                    basis).
19. New or reconstructed floor  a. Dioxin/furan    i. The dioxin/furan
 tile spray dryer.               emissions must     emissions measured
                                 not exceed 0.071   using Method 23 of
                                 ng/kg of           40 CFR part 60,
                                 throughput         appendix A-7, over
                                 processed.         the period of the
                                                    initial performance
                                                    test, do not exceed
                                                    0.071 ng/kg of
                                                    throughput
                                                    processed; and
                                                   ii. You establish and
                                                    have a record of the
                                                    operating limits
                                                    listed in Table 2 to
                                                    this subpart over
                                                    the period of the
                                                    initial performance
                                                    test during which
                                                    dioxin/furan
                                                    emissions did not
                                                    exceed 0.071 ng/kg
                                                    of throughput
                                                    processed.
20. New or reconstructed wall   a. Dioxin/furan    i. The dioxin/furan
 tile spray dryer.               emissions must     emissions measured
                                 not exceed 0.058   using Method 23 of
                                 ng/kg of           40 CFR part 60,
                                 throughput         appendix A-7, over
                                 processed.         the period of the
                                                    initial performance
                                                    test, do not exceed
                                                    0.058 ng/kg of
                                                    throughput
                                                    processed; and
                                                   ii. You establish and
                                                    have a record of the
                                                    operating limits
                                                    listed in Table 2 to
                                                    this subpart over
                                                    the period of the
                                                    initial performance
                                                    test during which
                                                    dioxin/furan
                                                    emissions did not
                                                    exceed 0.058 ng/kg
                                                    of throughput
                                                    processed.
21. New or reconstructed floor  a. Dioxin/furan    i. The dioxin/furan
 tile press dryer.               emissions must     emissions measured
                                 not exceed 0.024   using Method 23 of
                                 ng/kg of           40 CFR part 60,
                                 throughput         appendix A-7, over
                                 processed.         the period of the
                                                    initial performance
                                                    test, do not exceed
                                                    0.024 ng/kg of
                                                    throughput
                                                    processed; and
                                                   ii. You establish and
                                                    have a record of the
                                                    operating limits
                                                    listed in Table 2 to
                                                    this subpart over
                                                    the period of the
                                                    initial performance
                                                    test during which
                                                    dioxin/furan
                                                    emissions did not
                                                    exceed 0.024 ng/kg
                                                    of throughput
                                                    processed.
22. Existing, new, or           a. Minimize HAP    i. Use natural gas,
 reconstructed sanitaryware      emissions.         or equivalent, as
 shuttle kiln.                                      the kiln fuel; and
                                                   ii. Develop a
                                                    designed firing time
                                                    and temperature
                                                    cycle for the
                                                    sanitaryware shuttle
                                                    kiln. You must
                                                    either program the
                                                    time and temperature
                                                    cycle into your kiln
                                                    or track each step
                                                    on a log sheet; and
                                                   iii. Label each
                                                    sanitaryware shuttle
                                                    kiln with the
                                                    maximum load (in
                                                    tons) of greenware
                                                    that can be fired in
                                                    the kiln during a
                                                    single firing cycle;
                                                    and
                                                   iv. Develop
                                                    maintenance
                                                    procedures for each
                                                    kiln that, at a
                                                    minimum, specify the
                                                    frequency of
                                                    inspection and
                                                    maintenance of
                                                    temperature
                                                    monitoring devices,
                                                    controls that
                                                    regulate air-to-fuel
                                                    ratios, and controls
                                                    that regulate firing
                                                    cycles.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

0
12. Table 7 to subpart KKKKK is revised to read as follows:

Table 7 to Subpart KKKKK of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With
Emission Limitations and Work Practice Standards

    As stated in Sec.  63.8620, you must demonstrate continuous
compliance with each emission limitation and work practice standard
that applies to you according to the following table:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  For the following    You must demonstrate continuous
         For each . . .                 . . .                compliance by . . .                 Or by . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Tunnel or roller kiln         a. Each emission    i. If you use a bag leak detection   (1) Performing VE
 equipped with a DIFF or DLS/FF.  limit in Table 1    system, as prescribed in             observations of the
                                  to this subpart     63.8450(e), initiating corrective    DIFF or DLS/FF stack
                                  and each            action within 1 hour of a bag leak   at the frequency
                                  operating limit     detection system alarm and           specified in Sec.
                                  in Item 1 of        completing corrective actions in     63.8620(e) using
                                  Table 2 to this     accordance with your OM&M plan;      Method 22 of 40 CFR
                                  subpart for kilns   operating and maintaining the        part 60, appendix A-
                                  equipped with       fabric filter such that the alarm    7; and maintaining no
                                  DIFF or DLS/FF.     is not engaged for more than 5       VE from the DIFF or
                                                      percent of the total operating       DLS/FF stack; or
                                                      time in a 6-month block reporting   (2) Maintaining your
                                                      period; in calculating this          kiln temperature
                                                      operating time fraction, if          profile; for any
                                                      inspection of the fabric filter      incidence where the
                                                      demonstrates that no corrective      kiln is out of
                                                      action is required, no alarm time    control (i.e.,
                                                      is counted; if corrective action     exceeds its
                                                      is required, each alarm is counted   temperature profile),
                                                      as a minimum of 1 hour; if you       performing VE
                                                      take longer than 1 hour to           observations of the
                                                      initiate corrective action, the      DIFF or DLS/FF stack
                                                      alarm time is counted as the         as specified in Sec.
                                                      actual amount of time taken by you    63.8620(e) using
                                                      to initiate corrective action; and   Method 22 of 40 CFR
                                                                                part 60, appendix A-
                                                                                7; and observing no
                                                                                VE from the DIFF or
                                                                                DLS/FF stack.
                                                     ii. Verifying that lime is free-     ......................
                                                      flowing via a load cell, carrier
                                                      gas/lime flow indicator, carrier
                                                      gas pressure drop measurement
                                                      system, or other system; recording
                                                      all monitor or sensor output, and
                                                      if lime is found not to be free
                                                      flowing, promptly initiating and
                                                      completing corrective actions in
                                                      accordance with your OM&M plan;
                                                      recording the feeder setting once
                                                      each shift of operation to verify
                                                      that the feeder setting is being
                                                      maintained at or above the level
                                                      established during the HF/HCl
                                                      performance test in which
                                                      compliance was demonstrated.
2. Tunnel or roller kiln         a. Each emission    i. Collecting the scrubber liquid    ......................
 equipped with a WS.              limit in Table 1    pH data according to Sec.
                                  to this subpart     63.8600(a); reducing the scrubber
                                  and each            liquid pH data to 3-hour block
                                  operating limit     averages according to Sec.
                                  in Item 2 of        63.8600(a); maintaining the
                                  Table 2 to this     average scrubber liquid pH for
                                  subpart for kilns   each 3-hour block period at or
                                  equipped with WS.   above the average scrubber liquid
                                                      pH established during the HF/HCl
                                                      performance test in which
                                                      compliance was demonstrated; and
                                                     ii. Collecting the scrubber liquid   ......................
                                                      flow rate data according to Sec.
                                                      63.8600(a); reducing the scrubber
                                                      liquid flow rate data to 3-hour
                                                      block averages according to Sec.
                                                      63.8600(a); maintaining the
                                                      average scrubber liquid flow rate
                                                      for each 3-hour block period at or
                                                      above the highest average scrubber
                                                      liquid flow rate established
                                                      during the HF/HCl and PM
                                                      performance tests in which
                                                      compliance was demonstrated.
3. Tunnel or roller kiln         Each emission       Collecting the carbon flow rate      ......................
 equipped with an ACI system.     limit in Table 1    data according to Sec.
                                  to this subpart     63.8600(a); reducing the carbon
                                  and each            flow rate data to 3-hour block
                                  operating limit     averages according to Sec.
                                  in Item 3 of        63.8600(a); maintaining the
                                  Table 2 to this     average carbon flow rate for each
                                  subpart for kilns   3-hour block period at or above
                                  equipped with ACI   the highest average carbon flow
                                  system.             rate established during the Hg and
                                                      dioxin/furan performance tests in
                                                      which compliance was demonstrated.
4. Tunnel or roller kiln         Each emission       Collecting the operating             Collecting the
 intending to comply with         limit in Table 1    temperature data according to Sec.   operating temperature
 dioxin/furan emission limit      to this subpart       63.8600(a); and maintaining the    data according to
 without an ACI system.           and each            operating temperature at or below    Sec.   63.8600(a);
                                  operating limit     the highest operating temperature    reducing the
                                  in Item 4 of        established during the dioxin/       operating temperature
                                  Table 2 to this     furan performance test in which      data to a 12-hour
                                  subpart for kilns   compliance was demonstrated.         block average; and
                                  intending to                                             maintaining the
                                  comply with                                              average operating
                                  dioxin/furan                                             temperature for each
                                  emission limit                                           12-hour block period
                                  without an ACI                                           at or below the
                                  system.                                                  highest operating
                                                                                temperature
                                                                                established during
                                                                                the dioxin/furan
                                                                                performance test in
                                                                                which compliance was
                                                                                demonstrated.
5. Tunnel or roller kiln with    a. Each emission    i. Performing VE observations of     (1) Maintaining your
 no add-on control.               limit in Table 1    the stack at the frequency           kiln temperature
                                  to this subpart     specified in Sec.   63.8620(e)       profile; for any
                                  and each            using Method 22 of 40 CFR part 60,   incidence where the
                                  operating limit     appendix A-7; and maintaining no     kiln is out of
                                  in Item 5 of        VE from the stack; and               control (i.e.,
                                  Table 2 to this                                          exceeds its
                                  subpart for                                              temperature profile),
                                  tunnel or roller                                         performing VE
                                  kilns with no add-                                       observations of the
                                  on control.                                              DIFF or DLS/FF stack
                                                                                as specified in Sec.
                                                                                63.8620(e) using
                                                                                Method 22 of 40 CFR
                                                                                part 60, appendix A-
                                                                                7; and observing no
                                                                                VE from the stack.

                                                     ii. If your last calculated total    ......................
                                                      facility maximum potential HCl-
                                                      equivalent was not at or below the
                                                      health-based standard in Table 1
                                                      to this subpart, collecting the
                                                      kiln process rate data according
                                                      to Sec.   63.8600(a); reducing the
                                                      kiln process rate data to 3-hour
                                                      block averages according to Sec.
                                                      63.8600(a); maintaining the
                                                      average kiln process rate for each
                                                      3-hour block period at or below
                                                      the kiln process rate determined
                                                      according to Sec.   63.8595(g)(1);
                                                      and
                                                     iii. Collecting the operating        (1) Collecting the
                                                      temperature data according to Sec.   operating temperature
                                                        63.8600(a); and maintaining the    data according to
                                                      operating temperature at or below    Sec.   63.8600(a);
                                                      the highest operating temperature    reducing the
                                                      established during the dioxin/       operating temperature
                                                      furan performance test in which      data to a 12-hour
                                                      compliance was demonstrated.         block average; and
                                                                                maintaining the
                                                                                average operating
                                                                                temperature for each
                                                                                12-hour block period
                                                                                at or below the
                                                                                highest operating
                                                                                temperature
                                                                                established during
                                                                                the dioxin/furan
                                                                                performance test in
                                                                                which compliance was
                                                                                demonstrated.
6. Glaze spray operation         Each emission       If you use a bag leak detection      Performing VE
 equipped with a FF.              limit in Table 1    system, initiating corrective        observations of the
                                  to this subpart     action within 1 hour of a bag leak   FF stack at the
                                  and each            detection system alarm and           frequency specified
                                  operating limit     completing corrective actions in     in Sec.   63.8620(e)
                                  in Item 6 of        accordance with your OM&M plan;      using Method 22 of 40
                                  Table 2 to this     operating and maintaining the        CFR part 60, appendix
                                  subpart for glaze   fabric filter such that the alarm    A-7; and maintaining
                                  spray operations    is not engaged for more than 5       no VE from the FF
                                  equipped with a     percent of the total operating       stack.
                                  FF.                 time in a 6-month block reporting
                                                      period; in calculating this
                                                      operating time fraction, if
                                                      inspection of the fabric filter
                                                      demonstrates that no corrective
                                                      action is required, no alarm time
                                                      is counted; if corrective action
                                                      is required, each alarm is counted
                                                      as a minimum of 1 hour; if you
                                                      take longer than 1 hour to
                                                      initiate corrective action, the
                                                      alarm time is counted as the
                                                      actual amount of time taken by you
                                                      to initiate corrective action.
7. Glaze spray operation         a. Each emission    i. Collecting the scrubber pressure  ......................
 equipped with a WS.              limit in Table 1    drop data according to Sec.
                                  to this subpart     63.8600(a); reducing the scrubber
                                  and each            pressure drop data to 3-hour block
                                  operating limit     averages according to Sec.
                                  in Item 7 of        63.8600(a); maintaining the
                                  Table 2 to this     average scrubber pressure drop for
                                  subpart for kilns   each 3-hour block period at or
                                  equipped with WS.   above the average pressure drop
                                                      established during the PM
                                                      performance test in which
                                                      compliance was demonstrated; and
                                                     ii. Collecting the scrubber liquid   ......................
                                                      flow rate data according to Sec.
                                                      63.8600(a); reducing the scrubber
                                                      liquid flow rate data to 3-hour
                                                      block averages according to Sec.
                                                      63.8600(a); maintaining the
                                                      average scrubber liquid flow rate
                                                      for each 3-hour block period at or
                                                      above the average scrubber liquid
                                                      flow rate established during the
                                                      PM performance test in which
                                                      compliance was demonstrated.
8. Glaze spray operation         a. Each emission    i. Conducting daily inspections to   ......................
 equipped with a water curtain.   limit in Table 1    verify the presence of water flow
                                  to this subpart     to the wet control system; and
                                  and each           ii. Conducting annual inspections
                                  operating limit     of the interior of the control
                                  in Item 8 of        equipment (if applicable) to
                                  Table 2 to this     determine the structural integrity
                                  subpart for kilns   and condition of the control
                                  equipped with a     equipment.
                                  water curtain.
9. Glaze spray operation         Each emission       Conducting an annual visual          ......................
 equipped with baffles.           limit in Table 1    inspection of the baffles to
                                  to this subpart     confirm the baffles are in place.
                                  and each
                                  operating limit
                                  in Item 9 of
                                  Table 2 to this
                                  subpart for kilns
                                  equipped with
                                  baffles.
10. Spray dryer................  Each emission       Collecting the operating             ......................
                                  limit in Table 1    temperature data according to Sec.
                                  to this subpart       63.8600(a); reducing the
                                  and each            operating temperature data to 4-
                                  operating limit     hour block averages according to
                                  in Item 10 of       Sec.   63.8600(a); maintaining the
                                  Table 2 to this     average operating temperature for
                                  subpart for spray   each 4-hour block period at or
                                  dryers.             above the average operating
                                                      temperature established during the
                                                      dioxin/furan performance test in
                                                      which compliance was demonstrated.
11. Floor tile press dryer.....  Each emission       Collecting the operating             ......................
                                  limit in Table 1    temperature data according to Sec.
                                  to this subpart       63.8600(a); reducing the
                                  and each            operating temperature data to 4-
                                  operating limit     hour block averages according to
                                  in Item 11 of       Sec.   63.8600(a); maintaining the
                                  Table 2 to this     average operating temperature for
                                  subpart for floor   each 4-hour block period at or
                                  tile press dryers.  below the average operating
                                                      temperature established during the
                                                      dioxin/furan performance test in
                                                      which compliance was demonstrated.

12. Sanitaryware shuttle kiln..  a. Minimize HAP     i. Maintaining records documenting   ......................
                                  emissions.          your use of natural gas, or an
                                                      equivalent fuel, as the kiln fuel
                                                      at all times except during periods
                                                      of natural gas curtailment or
                                                      supply interruption; and
                                                     ii. If you intend to use an          ......................
                                                      alternative fuel, submitting a
                                                      notification of alternative fuel
                                                      use within 48 hours of the
                                                      declaration of a period of natural
                                                      gas curtailment or supply
                                                      interruption, as defined in Sec.
                                                      63.8665; and
                                                     iii. Submitting a report of          ......................
                                                      alternative fuel use within 10
                                                      working days after terminating the
                                                      use of the alternative fuel, as
                                                      specified in Sec.   63.8635(g);
                                                      and
                                                     iv. Using a designed firing time     ......................
                                                      and temperature cycle for each
                                                      sanitaryware shuttle kiln; and
                                                     v. For each firing load,             ......................
                                                      documenting the total tonnage of
                                                      greenware placed in the kiln to
                                                      ensure that it is not greater than
                                                      the maximum load identified in
                                                      Item 1.a.iii of Table 3 to this
                                                      subpart; and
                                                     vi. Following maintenance            ......................
                                                      procedures for each kiln that, at
                                                      a minimum, specify the frequency
                                                      of inspection and maintenance of
                                                      temperature monitoring devices,
                                                      controls that regulate air-to-fuel
                                                      ratios, and controls that regulate
                                                      firing cycles; and
                                                     vii. Developing and maintaining      ......................
                                                      records for each sanitaryware
                                                      shuttle kiln, as specified in Sec.
                                                        63.8640.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2018-17933 Filed 8-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: June 28, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 124)]
[Notices]
[Page 35452]
[DOCID:fr28jn07-47]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-491-000]

Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC
Gas Tariff

June 20, 2007.
    Take notice that on June 15, 2007, Northern Natural Gas Company
(Northern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective
date of August 1, 2007:

2nd Revised Sheet No. 54B 21
Revised Sheet No. 61 21
Revised Sheet No. 62
1 Revised 24 Revised Sheet No. 63
1 Revised 23 Revised Sheet No. 64

    Northern states that the filing is being made in accordance with
the provisions for adjusting fuel percentages in the event of the
abandonment of compression contained in Sheet No. 54 of its tariff.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-12473 Filed 6-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 186 (Friday, September 25, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57765-57766]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24319]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

29 CFR Part 1904

[Docket Number: OSHA-2015-0006]
RIN 1218-AC84

Clarification of Employer's Continuing Obligation To Make and
Maintain an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness;
Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is
extending the deadline for submitting comments on the proposed rule:
Clarification of Employer's Continuing Obligation To Make and Maintain
an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness.

DATES: The comment due date for the proposed rule published in the
Federal Register on July 29, 2015 (80 FR 45116) is extended. Comments
must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by October 28, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments and additional material using any of the
following methods:
    Electronically. You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal e-
Rulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions on the Web site for making
electronic submissions.
    Facsimile. If your submission, including attachments, does not
exceed ten pages, you may fax it to the OSHA Docket Office at (202)
693-1648. OSHA does not require hard copies of documents transmitted by
facsimile. However, if you have supplemental attachments that are not
delivered by facsimile, you must submit those attachments, by the
applicable deadline, to the OSHA Docket Office, Technical Data Center,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Room N-
2625, Washington, DC 20210. Any such attachment must clearly identify
the sender's name, the date of submission, the title of the rulemaking
(Clarification of Employer's Continuing Obligation to Make and Maintain
an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness), and the
docket number (OSHA-2015-0006) so that the docket Office can add the
attachment(s) to the appropriate facsimile submission.
    Regular or express mail, hand delivery, or messenger (courier)
service. You may submit comments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket
Number OSHA-2015-0006, Technical Data Center, OSHA, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Room N-2625, Washington, DC 20210;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. (OSHA's TTY number is<PHONE_NUMBER>).
Please contact the OSHA Docket Office for information about Department
of Labor security procedures that could affect the delivery of
materials by express mail, hand delivery, and messenger or courier
service. Also note that security-related procedures may delay the
Agency's receipt of comments submitted by regular mail. The Docket
Office will accept deliveries by hand, express mail, or messenger and
courier service during the Docket Office's normal business hours, 8:15
a.m. to 4:45 p.m.
    Instructions for submitting comments: All submissions must include
the Agency's name (OSHA), the title of the rulemaking (Clarification of
Employer's Continuing Obligation to Make and Maintain an Accurate
Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness), and the docket number
(OSHA-2015-0006). OSHA will place comments and other material,
including any personal information you provide, in the public docket
without revision, and the comments and other materials will be
available online at http://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA
cautions you about submitting statements and information that you do
not want made available to the public or that contain personal
information (about yourself or others) such as Social Security numbers,
birthdates, and medical data. For additional information on the
rulemaking process, see the Background heading in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION part of this document.
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to Docket Number OSHA-20015-0006 at http://www.regulations.gov or to the OSHA Docket Office at the address
provided previously. The electronic docket for this proposed rule,
established at http://www.regulations.gov, lists all of the documents
in the docket. However, some information (e.g., copyrighted material)
is not publicly available to read or download through that Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available for
inspection at the OSHA Docket Office. Contact the OSHA Docket Office
for assistance in locating docket submissions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: General information and press
inquiries: Contact Frank Meilinger, Director, Office of Communications,
Room N-3647, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Technical inquiries: Contact William Perry,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor,
Room N-3718, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Copies of this Federal Register notice and news releases:
Electronic copies of these documents are available at OSHA's Web page
at http://www.osha.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    OSHA published a notice of proposed rulemaking on July 15, 2015,
titled ``Clarification of Employer's Continuing Obligation To Make and
Maintain an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness.''
The notice stated that comments were due by September 28, 2015. The
National Association of Home Builders requested that the deadline for
submitting comments be extended by 60 days to provide additional time
for interested parties to engage in ``legal analysis, as well as
careful review and discussion'' of the proposed rule. See Ex. OSHA-
2015-006-0004. OSHA believes an extension of 30 days is reasonable.
Therefore, to allow commenters adequate time to prepare complete and
accurate comments on the proposed rule, OSHA is, with this notice,
extending the deadline for submitting comments in response to the
proposed rule to October 28, 2015.

II. Authority and Signature

    David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210, authorized the
preparation of this notice pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 657, 673; 5 U.S.C.
553; and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (77 FR 3912; January 25,
2012), and 29 CFR 1911.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on September 21, 2015.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2015-24319 Filed 9-24-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-26-P