[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64936-64937]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26999]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC12-6-000.
    Applicants: Michigan Electric Transmission Company, Wolverine Power
Supply Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Application for Order Authorizing Transactions Under
Section 203 of the Federal Power Act, and Request for Waivers and
Confidential Treatment of Michigan Electric Transmission Company, LLC,
and Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative, Inc.

    Filed Date: 10/11/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111011-5312.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 1, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: EC12-7-000.
    Applicants: Michigan Electric Transmission Company, Wolverine Power
Supply Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Application for Order Authorizing Transactions Under
Section 203 of the Federal Power Act, and Request for Waivers of
Michigan Electric Transmission Company, LLC and Wolverine Power Supply
Cooperative, Inc.
    Filed Date: 10/11/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111011-5314.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 1, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3125-003; ER10-3102-003; ER10-3100-003; ER10-
3107-003; ER10-3109-003.
    Applicants: Effingham County Power, LLC, Walton County Power, LLC,
Washington County Power, LLC, AL Sandersville LLC, MPC Generating LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of AL
Sandersville LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111012-5088.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 2, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3962-001.
    Applicants: City of Banning, California.
    Description: City of Banning, California submits tariff filing per
35: Offer of Settlement and Settlement Agreement to be effective 7/1/
2011.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111012-5007.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 2, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4462-002.
    Applicants: NEPM II, LLC.
    Description: NEPM II, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.17(b): NEPM
II, LLC Amendment to Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 11/1/
2011.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111012-5066.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 2, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-64-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits tariff
filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: Letter Agreement for Houweling Nurseries
Oxnard Project with HNO to be effective 10/7/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111012-5053.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 2, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-65-000.
    Applicants: Granite Reliable Power, LLC.
    Description: Granite Reliable Power, LLC Request for Waiver of
Unreserved Transmission Use Penalties and Advance Reservation.
    Filed Date: 10/11/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111011-5318.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 1, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-66-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: First Energy submits revised Schedule B to ISA No.
2832 to be effective 10/10/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111012-5071.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 2, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES11-45-000.
    Applicants: Old Dominion Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Amendment to Application of Old Dominion Electric
Cooperative.
    Filed Date: 10/07/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111007-5036.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following open access
transmission tariff filings:

    Docket Numbers: OA12-1-000.
    Applicants: SU FERC, L.L.C.
    Description: Request for Waiver of Order No. 1000 of SU FERC,
L.L.C.
    Filed Date: 10/11/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111011-5311.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 1, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
reliability filings:

    Docket Numbers: RD11-12-000.
    Applicants: North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
    Description: Petition of the North American Electric Reliability
Corporation for Approval of Interpretations to Requirements of
Reliability Standards EOP-001-0 and EOP-001-2, Emergency Operations
Planning.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110909-5258.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 2, 2011.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 12, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-26999 Filed 10-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 190 (Thursday, October 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59209-59210]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24888]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-2736.

Extension:
    Rule 613; SEC File No. 270-616, OMB Control No. 3235-0671.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the
existing collection of information provided for in the following rule:
Rule 613 (17 CFR 242.613), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
    Rule 613 of Regulation NMS (17 CFR part 242) requires national
securities exchanges and national securities associations (``self-
regulatory organizations'' or ``SROs'') to jointly submit to the
Commission a national market system (``NMS'') plan to govern the
creation, implementation, and maintenance of a consolidated audit trail
and central repository for the collection of information for NMS
securities. The NMS plan must require each SRO and its respective
members to provide certain data to the central repository in compliance
with Rule 613. When it adopted Rule 613, the Commission discussed the
burden hours associated with the development and submission of the NMS
plan.\1\ In doing so, the Commission noted that the development and
submission of the NMS plan is part of a multi-step process for
developing the consolidated audit trail and that the Commission
deferred its discussion of the burden hours associated with the other
paperwork requirements required by Rule 613--such as the requirements
to provide certain data to the central repository--until after the SROs
submit an NMS plan and there has been an opportunity for public
comment.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67457 (July 18,
2012), 77 FR 45722 (August 1, 2012) (``Adopting Release''), at
45804-45807.
    \2\ Id. at 45804.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The SROs submitted to the Commission the NMS plan on September 30,
2014 \3\ and an amended and restated NMS Plan on February 27, 2015.\4\
Although the existing collection of information pertains to the
development and submission of an NMS plan, and such NMS plan has been
developed and submitted, the Commission believes it is prudent to
extend this collection of information during the pendency of the
Commission's review of the NMS plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Letter from the SROs, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
Commission, dated September 30, 2014 (``CAT NMS Plan'').
    \4\ See Letter from the SROs, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
Commission, dated February 27, 2015 (``Amended and Restated CAT NMS
Plan'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission estimates that each of the 19 SROs would spend a
total of 2,760 burden hours of internal legal, compliance, information
technology, and business operations time to comply with the existing
collection of information, calculated as follows: (880 programmer
analyst hours) + (880 business analyst hours) + (700 attorney hours) +
(300 compliance manager hours) = 2,760 burden hours to prepare and file
an NMS plan, or approximately 52,440 burden hours in the aggregate,
calculated as follows: (2,760 burden

hours per SRO) x (19 SROs) = 52,440 burden hours. Amortized over three
years, the annualized burden hours would be 920 hours per SRO, or a
total of 17,480 for all 19 SROs.
    The Commission further estimates that the aggregate one-time
reporting burden for preparing and filing an NMS plan would be
approximately $20,000 in external legal costs per SRO, calculated as
follows: 50 legal hours x $400 per hour = $20,000, for an aggregate
burden of $380,000, calculated as follows: ($20,000 in external legal
costs per SRO) x (19 SROs) = $380,000. Amortized over three years, the
annualized capital external cost would be $6,667 per SRO, or a total of
$126,667 for all 19 SROs.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following Web site: www.reginfo.gov. Comments should
be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an
email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB within
30 days of this notice.

    Dated: September 25, 2015.
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-24888 Filed 9-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 91 (Friday, May 12, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22066-22069]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09661]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0358; Special Conditions No. 25-659-SC]

Special Conditions: Bombardier Aerospace Inc., Model BD-100-1A10
Airplane; Non-Rechargeable Lithium Battery Installations

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for non-rechargeable
lithium battery installations on the Bombardier Aerospace Inc.
(Bombardier) Model BD-100-1A10 airplane. Non-rechargeable lithium
batteries are a novel or unusual design feature when compared to the
state of technology envisioned in the airworthiness standards for
transport category airplanes. The applicable airworthiness regulations
do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design
feature. These special conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a
level

of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness
standards.

DATES: This action is effective on Bombardier on May 12, 2017. We must
receive your comments by June 26, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2017-0358
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to http://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nazih Khaouly, Airplane and Flight
Crew Interface Branch, ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Future Requests for Installation of Non-Rechargeable Lithium Batteries

    The FAA anticipates that non-rechargeable lithium batteries will be
installed in most makes and models of transport category airplanes. We
intend to require special conditions for certification projects
involving non-rechargeable lithium battery installations to address
certain safety issues until we can revise the airworthiness
requirements. Applying special conditions to these installations across
the range of transport category airplanes will ensure regulatory
consistency.
    Typically, the FAA issues special conditions after receiving an
application for type certificate approval of a novel or unusual design
feature. However, the FAA has found that the presence of non-
rechargeable lithium batteries in certification projects is not always
immediately identifiable, since the battery itself may not be the focus
of the project. Meanwhile, the inclusion of these batteries has become
virtually ubiquitous on in-production transport category airplanes,
which shows that there will be a need for these special conditions.
Also, delaying the issuance of special conditions until after each
design application is received could lead to costly certification
delays. Therefore the FAA finds it necessary to issue special
conditions applicable to these battery installations on particular
makes and models of aircraft.
    On April 22, 2016, the FAA published special conditions no. 25-612-
SC in the Federal Register (81 FR 23573) applicable to Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation for the GVI airplane. Those were the first
special conditions the FAA issued for non-rechargeable lithium battery
installations. We explained in that document our decision to make those
special conditions effective one year after publication in the Federal
Register, which is April 22, 2017. In those special conditions, the FAA
stated its intention to apply non-rechargeable lithium battery special
conditions to design changes on other makes and models applied for
after this same date.
    Section 1205 of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 1996 requires the
FAA to consider the extent to which Alaska is not served by
transportation modes other than aviation and to establish appropriate
regulatory distinctions when modifying airworthiness regulations that
affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. In consideration of this
requirement and the overall impact on safety, the FAA does not intend
to require non-rechargeable lithium battery special conditions for
design changes that only replace a 121.5 megahertz (MHz) emergency
locator transmitter (ELT) with a 406 MHz ELT that meets Technical
Standard Order C126b, or later revision, on transport airplanes
operating only in Alaska. This will support our efforts of encouraging
operators in Alaska to upgrade to a 406 MHz ELT. These ELTs provide
significantly improved accuracy for lifesaving services to locate an
accident site in Alaskan terrain. The FAA considers that the safety
benefits from upgrading to a 406 MHz ELT for Alaskan operations will
outweigh the battery fire risk.

Comments Invited

    The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in prior instances and has been derived
without substantive change from those previously issued. It is unlikely
that prior public comment would result in a significant change from the
substance contained herein. Therefore, the FAA has determined that
prior public notice and comment are unnecessary and impracticable, and
good cause exists for adopting these special conditions upon
publication in the Federal Register. The FAA is requesting comments to
allow interested persons to submit views that may not have been
submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment described
above.
    We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
    We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We may change these special conditions based on the comments
we receive.

Background

    Bombardier holds type certificate no. T00005NY, which provides the
certification basis for the BD-100-1A10 airplane. The BD-100-1A10 is a
twin engine, transport category airplane with a passenger seating
capacity of 16 and a maximum takeoff weight of 38,500 to 40,600 pounds,
depending on the specific design.
    The FAA is issuing these special conditions for non-rechargeable
lithium battery installations on the BD-100-1A10 airplane. The current
battery requirements in title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 25 are inadequate for addressing an airplane with non-rechargeable
lithium batteries.

Type Certification Basis

    Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101, Bombardier must show that
the BD-100-1A10 airplane meets the applicable provisions of the
regulations listed in type certificate no. T00005NY or the applicable
regulations in effect on the date of application for the change, except
for earlier amendments as agreed upon by the FAA. In addition, the
certification basis includes certain special conditions, exemptions, or
later amended sections that are not relevant to these special
conditions.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the BD-100-1A10 airplane because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under the provisions of Sec.  21.16.
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the airplane model
for which they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model
be amended later to include any other model that incorporates the same
novel or unusual design feature, or should any other model already
included on the same type certificate be modified to incorporate the
same novel or unusual design feature, these special conditions would
also apply to the other model under Sec.  21.101.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the BD-100-1A10 must comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
    The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec.  11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec.  21.101.

Novel or Unusual Design Feature

    The novel or unusual design feature is the installation of non-
rechargeable lithium batteries.
    For the purpose of these special conditions, we refer to a battery
and battery system as a battery. A battery system consists of the
battery and any protective, monitoring, and alerting circuitry or
hardware inside or outside of the battery. It also includes vents
(where necessary) and packaging.

Discussion

    The FAA derived the current regulations governing installation of
batteries in transport category airplanes from Civil Air Regulations
(CAR) 4b.625(d) as part of the recodification of CAR 4b that
established 14 CFR part 25 in February 1965. This recodification
basically reworded the CAR 4b battery requirements, which are currently
in Sec.  25.1353(b)(1) through (4). Non-rechargeable lithium batteries
are novel and unusual with respect to the state of technology
considered when these requirements were codified. These batteries
introduce higher energy levels into airplane systems through new
chemical compositions in various battery cell sizes and construction.
Interconnection of these cells in battery packs introduces failure
modes that require unique design considerations, such as provisions for
thermal management.
    Recent events involving rechargeable and non-rechargeable lithium
batteries prompted the FAA to initiate a broad evaluation of these
energy storage technologies. In January 2013, two independent events
involving rechargeable lithium-ion batteries revealed unanticipated
failure modes. A National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) letter to
the FAA, dated May 22, 2014, which is available at http://www.ntsb.gov,
filename A-14-032-036.pdf, describes these events.
    On July 12, 2013, an event involving a non-rechargeable lithium
battery in an emergency locator transmitter installation demonstrated
unanticipated failure modes. The United Kingdom's Air Accidents
Investigation Branch Bulletin S5/2013 describes this event.
    Some known uses of rechargeable and non-rechargeable lithium
batteries on airplanes include:
     Flight deck and avionics systems such as displays, global
positioning systems, cockpit voice recorders, flight data recorders,
underwater locator beacons, navigation computers, integrated avionics
computers, satellite network and communication systems, communication
management units, and remote-monitor electronic line-replaceable units;
     Cabin safety, entertainment, and communications equipment,
including emergency locator transmitters, life rafts, escape slides,
seatbelt air bags, cabin management systems, Ethernet switches, routers
and media servers, wireless systems, Internet and in-flight
entertainment systems, satellite televisions, remotes, and handsets;
     Systems in cargo areas including door controls, sensors,
video surveillance equipment, and security systems.
    Some known potential hazards and failure modes associated with non-
rechargeable lithium batteries are:
     Internal failures: In general, these batteries are
significantly more susceptible to internal failures that can result in
self-sustaining increases in temperature and pressure (i.e., thermal
runaway) than their nickel-cadmium or lead-acid counterparts. The
metallic lithium can ignite, resulting in a self-sustaining fire or
explosion.
     Fast or imbalanced discharging: Fast discharging or an
imbalanced discharge of one cell of a multi-cell battery may create an
overheating condition that results in an uncontrollable venting
condition, which in turn leads to a thermal event or an explosion.
     Flammability: Unlike nickel-cadmium and lead-acid
batteries, lithium batteries use higher energy and current in an
electrochemical system that can be configured to maximize energy
storage of lithium. They also use liquid electrolytes that can be
extremely flammable. The electrolyte, as well as the electrodes, can
serve as a source of fuel for an external fire if the battery casing is
breached.
    Special condition no. 1 of these special conditions requires that
each individual cell within a non-rechargeable lithium battery be
designed to maintain safe temperatures and pressures. Special condition
no. 2 addresses these same issues but for the entire battery. Special
condition no. 2 requires the battery be designed to prevent propagation
of a thermal event, such as self-sustained, uncontrollable increases in
temperature or pressure from one cell to adjacent cells.
    Special conditions nos. 1 and 2 are intended to ensure that the
non-rechargeable lithium battery and its cells are designed to
eliminate the potential for uncontrollable failures. However, a certain
number of failures will occur due to various factors beyond the control
of the battery designer. Therefore, other special conditions are
intended to protect the airplane and its occupants if failure occurs.
    Special conditions 3, 7, and 8 are self-explanatory.
    Special condition no. 4 makes it clear that the flammable fluid
fire protection requirements of Sec.  25.863 apply to non-rechargeable
lithium battery installations. Section 25.863 is applicable to areas of
the airplane that could be exposed to flammable fluid leakage from
airplane systems. Non-rechargeable lithium batteries contain an
electrolyte that is a flammable fluid.
    Special condition no. 5 requires that each non-rechargeable lithium
battery installation not damage surrounding structure or adjacent
systems, equipment, or electrical wiring from corrosive fluids or gases
that may escape in such a way as to cause a major or more severe
failure condition.

    While special condition no. 5 addresses corrosive fluids and gases,
special condition no. 6 addresses heat. Special condition no. 6
requires that each non-rechargeable lithium battery installation have
provisions to prevent any hazardous effect on airplane structure or
systems caused by the maximum amount of heat the battery installation
can generate due to any failure of it or its individual cells. The
means of meeting special conditions nos. 5 and 6 may be the same, but
the requirements are independent and address different hazards.
    These special conditions apply to all non-rechargeable lithium
battery installations in lieu of Sec.  25.1353(b)(1) through (4) at
Amendment 25-123 or Sec.  25.1353(c)(1) through (4) at earlier
amendments. Those regulations remain in effect for other battery
installations.
    These special conditions contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of
safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness
standards.

Applicability

    These special conditions are applicable to the BD-100-1A10
airplane. Should Bombardier apply at a later date for a change to the
type certificate to include another model incorporating the same novel
or unusual design feature, these special conditions would apply to that
model as well.
    These special conditions are only applicable to design changes
applied for after the effective date.
    These special conditions are not applicable to changes to
previously certified non-rechargeable lithium battery installations
where the only change is either cosmetic or to relocate the
installation to improve the safety of the airplane and occupants.
Previously certified non-rechargeable lithium battery installations, as
used in this paragraph, are those installations approved for
certification projects applied for on or before the effective date of
these special conditions. A cosmetic change is a change in appearance
only, and does not change any function or safety characteristic of the
battery installation. These special conditions are also not applicable
to unchanged, previously certified non-rechargeable lithium battery
installations that are affected by a change in a manner that improves
the safety of its installation. The FAA determined that these
exclusions are in the public interest because the need to meet all of
the special conditions might otherwise deter these design changes that
improve safety.

Conclusion

    This action affects only a certain novel or unusual design feature
on one model of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability.
    The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in prior instances and has been derived
without substantive change from those previously issued. It is unlikely
that prior public comment would result in a significant change from the
substance contained herein. Therefore, the FAA has determined that
prior public notice and comment are unnecessary and impracticable, and
good cause exists for adopting these special conditions upon
publication in the Federal Register. The FAA is requesting comments to
allow interested persons to submit views that may not have been
submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment described
above.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and record keeping
requirements.

0
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.

The Special Conditions

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for the Bombardier Model BD-100-1A10
airplane.

Non-Rechargeable Lithium Battery Installations

    In lieu of Sec.  25.1353(b)(1) through (4) at Amendment 25-123 or
Sec.  25.1353(c)(1) through (4) at earlier amendments, each non-
rechargeable lithium battery installation must:
    1. Be designed to maintain safe cell temperatures and pressures
under all foreseeable operating conditions to prevent fire and
explosion.
    2. Be designed to prevent the occurrence of self-sustaining,
uncontrollable increases in temperature or pressure.
    3. Not emit explosive or toxic gases, either in normal operation or
as a result of its failure, that may accumulate in hazardous quantities
within the airplane.
    4. Meet the requirements of Sec.  25.863.
    5. Not damage surrounding structure or adjacent systems, equipment,
or electrical wiring from corrosive fluids or gases that may escape in
such a way as to cause a major or more severe failure condition.
    6. Have provisions to prevent any hazardous effect on airplane
structure or systems caused by the maximum amount of heat it can
generate due to any failure of it or its individual cells.
    7. Have a failure sensing and warning system to alert the
flightcrew if its failure affects safe operation of the airplane.
    8. Have a means for the flightcrew or maintenance personnel to
determine the battery charge state if the battery's function is
required for safe operation of the airplane.

    Note: A battery system consists of the battery and any
protective, monitoring, and alerting circuitry or hardware inside or
outside of the battery. It also includes vents (where necessary) and
packaging. For the purpose of these special conditions, a
``battery'' and ``battery system'' are referred to as a battery.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 27, 2017.
Paul Bernado,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-09661 Filed 5-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72239-72240]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30085]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Commercial Air
Tour Limitations in the Grand Canyon National Park Special Flight Rules
Area

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The FAA uses the information gathered from Grand Canyon
National Park air tour operators to monitor their compliance with the
Federal regulations.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by January 23, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy DePaepe at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0653.
    Title: Commercial Air Tour Limitations in the Grand Canyon National
Park Special Flight Rules Area.
    Form Numbers: There are no FAA forms associated with this
collection.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: Each operator seeking to obtain or in possession of an
air carrier operating certificate must comply with the requirements of
14 CFR part 135 or part 121, as appropriate. Each of these operators
conducting air tours in the Grand Canyon National Park must
additionally comply with the collection requirements for that airspace.
The FAA will use the information it collects and reviews to monitor
compliance with the regulations and, if necessary, take enforcement
action against violators of the regulations.
    Respondents: Approximately 13 air operators.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.

    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 44 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 38 hours.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Kathy
DePaepe, Room 126B, Federal Aviation Administration, AES-200, 6500 S.
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 14, 2011.
Albert R. Spence,
FAA Assistant Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises
Business Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2011-30085 Filed 11-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 22, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 76)]
[Notices]
[Page 18418-18419]
[DOCID:fr22ap09-87]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59773; File Nos. SR-BX-2009-019, SR-NASDAQ-2009-032,
SR-Phlx-2009-31]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; the NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC; NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Changes To Amend the Certificate of
Incorporation of the NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.

April 15, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 2, 2009, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX''), the NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC (``NASDAQ Exchange'') and NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. (``Phlx'')
(collectively, the ``NASDAQ OMX Exchange Subsidiaries'') \3\ filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule changes as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been substantially prepared by the NASDAQ OMX Exchange
Subsidiaries. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule changes from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ The Commission notes that on April 2, 2009, substantially
similar filings also were submitted by Boston Stock Exchange
Clearing Corporation (``BSECC'') (SR-BSECC-2009-003) and Stock
Clearing Corporation of Philadelphia (``SCCP'') (SR-SCCP-2009-02),
the clearing corporation subsidiaries of NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.
(``NASDAQ OMX'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Changes

    The NASDAQ OMX Exchange Subsidiaries are filing the proposed rule
changes with regard to proposed changes to the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation (the ``Certificate'') of their parent corporation, NASDAQ
OMX. The proposed rule changes will be implemented as soon as
practicable following filing with the Commission. The text of the
proposed rule changes is available at http:// www.cchwallstreet.com/
nasdaqomx/, http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/ Trader.aspx?id=BSEIERules2009,
and http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/ Micro.aspx?id=PhlxApprovedRulefilings,
respectively, and at the respective NASDAQ OMX Exchange Subsidiary's
principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Changes

    In their filings with the Commission, each of the NASDAQ OMX
Exchange Subsidiaries included statements concerning the purpose of and
basis for its proposed rule change and discussed any comments it
received on its proposed rule change. The text of these statements may
be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. Each of the
NASDAQ OMX Exchange Subsidiaries has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Changes

1. Purpose
    NASDAQ OMX is proposing to make amendments to its Certificate. As
provided in Articles XI and XII of the NASDAQ OMX By-Laws, proposed
amendments to the Certificate are to be reviewed by the Board of
Directors of each self-regulatory subsidiary of NASDAQ OMX, and if any
such proposed amendment must, under Section 19 of the Act and the rules
promulgated thereunder, be filed with, or filed with and approved by,
the Commission before such amendment may be effective, then such
amendment shall not be effective until filed with, or filed with and
approved by, the Commission, as the case may be. The governing boards
of BX, the NASDAQ Exchange, Phlx, BSECC, and SCCP have each reviewed
the proposed change and determined that it should be filed with the
Commission.\4\ The changes to the Certificate are limited in scope, and
under Delaware law, they do not require approval by the stockholders of
NASDAQ OMX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ BX, the NASDAQ Exchange, Phlx, BSECC, and SCCP have each
submitted its respective filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii)
of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, NASDAQ OMX is proposing to restate, without
amendment, its Certificate. The Certificate is composed of a previous
Restated Certificate of Incorporation adopted in 2003, and numerous
subsequent amendments, which, under Delaware law, are adopted as
freestanding documents. However, Delaware law allows the various
documents comprising a certificate of incorporation to be consolidated
into a single restated certificate upon approval of a corporation's
board of directors. The change will assist interested persons,
including NASDAQ OMX stockholders and Commission staff, in reading the
Certificate without having to review multiple documents. The restated
Certificate reflects the deletion of both the Certificate of
Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series D Preferred Stock and
the Certificate of Elimination that was recently filed with respect to
it.\5\ Since the latter component of the Certificate cancels the
former, they are both deleted from the restated Certificate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59460 (February 26,
2009), 74 FR 9841 (March 6, 2009) (SR-NASDAQ-2009-010, SR-BX-2009-
009, SR-Phlx-2009-14); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59496
(March 3, 2009), 74 FR 10626 (March 11, 2009) (SR-BSECC-2009-01);
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59494 (March 3, 2009), 74 FR
10642 (March 11, 2009) (SR-SCCP-2009-01).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The NASDAQ OMX Exchange Subsidiaries believe that their respective
proposed rule changes are consistent with the provisions of Section 6
of the Act,\6\ in general, and with Sections 6(b)(1) and (b)(5) of the
Act,\7\ in particular, in that the proposal enables the NASDAQ OMX
Exchange Subsidiaries to be so organized as to have the capacity to be
able to carry out the purposes of the Act and to comply with and
enforce compliance by members and persons associated with members with
provisions of the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and self-
regulatory organization rules, and is designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the

mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The proposed
change will enhance the clarity of NASDAQ OMX's governance documents by
restating the various documents comprising the Certificate as a single
document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1), (b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statements on Burden on Competition

    The NASDAQ OMX Exchange Subsidiaries do not believe that the
proposed rule changes will result in any burden on competition that is
not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act,
as amended.

C. Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statements on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Changes Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Changes and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule changes have become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \8\ and subparagraph (f)(3) of Rule
19b-4 thereunder.\9\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
respective proposed rule change by the applicable NASDAQ OMX Exchange
Subsidiary, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule changes if
it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
changes, are consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any
of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml, or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Nos. SR-BX-2009-019, SR-NASDAQ-2009-032, SR-Phlx-2009-31 on the
subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Nos. SR-BX-2009-019, SR-NASDAQ-
2009-032, SR-Phlx-2009-31. These file numbers should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and
review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site
(http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all
subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the
proposed rule changes that are filed with the Commission, and all
written communications relating to the proposed rule changes between
the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld
from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will
be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public
Reference Room on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m.
and 3 p.m. Copies of such filings also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Nos. SR-BX-2009-019, SR-NASDAQ-2009-
032, and SR-Phlx-2009-31, and should be submitted on or before May 13,
2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-9202 Filed 4-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: October 15, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 198)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 58268-58274]
[DOCID:fr15oc07-12]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

49 CFR Part 541

[Docket No. NHTSA 2007-28874]

Preliminary Theft Data; Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Publication of preliminary theft data; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on data about passenger motor
vehicle thefts that occurred in calendar year (CY) 2005 including theft
rates for existing passenger motor vehicle lines manufactured in model
year (MY) 2005. The preliminary theft data indicate that the vehicle
theft rate for CY/MY 2005 vehicles (1.85 thefts per thousand vehicles)
increased by 1.1 percent from the theft rate for CY/MY 2004 vehicles
(1.83 thefts per thousand vehicles).
    Publication of these data fulfills NHTSA's statutory obligation to
periodically obtain accurate and timely theft data, and publish the
information for review and comment.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 14, 2007.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments (identified by DOT Docket No. NHTSA-
2007-28874) by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov.
 Follow the online instructions for submitting

comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Public
Participation heading of

the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Note that all
comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov
, including any personal information provided.

Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit http://DocketInfo.dot.gov
.

    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov. or the street

address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Her fax number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NHTSA administers a program for reducing
motor vehicle theft. The central feature of this program is the Federal
Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard, 49 CFR Part 541. The standard
specifies performance requirements for inscribing or affixing vehicle
identification numbers (VINs) onto certain major original equipment and
replacement parts of high-theft lines of passenger motor vehicles.
    The agency is required by 49 U.S.C. 33104(b)(4) to periodically
obtain, from the most reliable source, accurate and timely theft data,
and publish the data for review and comment. To fulfill the Sec.
33104(b)(4) mandate, this document reports the preliminary theft data
for CY 2005 the most recent calendar year for which data are available.
    In calculating the 2005 theft rates, NHTSA followed the same
procedures it used in calculating the MY 2004 theft rates. (For 2004
theft data calculations, see 71 FR 59400, October 10, 2006.) As in all
previous reports, NHTSA's data were based on information provided to
the agency by the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation. The NCIC is a governmental system that
receives vehicle theft information from nearly 23,000 criminal justice
agencies and other law enforcement authorities throughout the United
States. The NCIC data also include reported thefts of self-insured and
uninsured vehicles, not all of which are reported to other data
sources. The 2005 theft rate for each vehicle line was calculated by
dividing the number of reported thefts of MY 2005 vehicles of that line
stolen during calendar year 2005, by the total number of vehicles in
that line manufactured for MY 2005, as reported by manufacturers to the
Environmental Protection Agency.
    The preliminary 2005 theft data show an increase in the vehicle
theft rate when compared to the theft rate experienced in CY/MY 2004.
The preliminary theft rate for MY 2005 passenger vehicles stolen in
calendar year 2005 increased to 1.85 thefts per thousand vehicles
produced, an increase of 1.1 percent from the rate of 1.83 thefts per
thousand vehicles experienced by MY 2004 vehicles in CY 2004. For MY
2005 vehicles, out of a total of 233 vehicle lines, 24 lines had a
theft rate higher than 3.5826 per thousand vehicles, the established
median theft rate for MYs 1990/1991 (See 59 FR 12400, March 16, 1994).
Of the 24 vehicle lines with a theft rate higher than 3.5826, 21 are
passenger car lines, two are multipurpose passenger vehicle lines, and
one is a light-duty truck line.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP15OC07.000

    In Table I, NHTSA has tentatively ranked each of the MY 2005
vehicle lines in descending order of theft rate. Public comment is
sought on the accuracy of the data, including the data for the
production volumes of individual vehicle lines.
    Comments must not exceed 15 pages in length (49 CFR part 553.21).
Attachments may be appended to these submissions without regard to the
15 page limit. This limitation is intended to encourage commenters to
detail their primary arguments in a concise fashion.
    If a commenter wishes to submit certain information under a claim
of confidentiality, three copies of the complete submission, including
purportedly confidential business information, should be submitted to
the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the street address given above, and two
copies from which the purportedly confidential information has been
deleted should be submitted to Dockets. A request for confidentiality
should be accompanied by a cover letter setting forth the information
specified in the agency's confidential business information regulation.
49 CFR part 512.
    All comments received before the close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above for this document will be considered, and
will be available for examination in the docket at the above address
both before and after that date. To the extent possible, comments filed
after the closing date will also be considered. Comments on this
document will be available for inspection in the docket. NHTSA will
continue to file relevant information as it becomes available for
inspection in the docket after the closing date, and it is recommended
that interested persons continue to examine the docket for new
material.
    Those persons desiring to be notified upon receipt of their
comments in the rules docket should enclose a self-addressed, stamped
postcard in the envelope with their comments. Upon receiving the
comments, the docket supervisor will return the postcard by mail.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit
http://dms.dot.gov.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33101, 33102 and 33104; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.

   Preliminary Report of Theft Rates for Model Year 2005 Passenger Motor Vehicles Stolen in Calendar Year 2005
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                2005  Theft
                                                                                Production   rate  (per
                 Manufacturer                    Make/model (line)            Thefts      (mfr's)       1,000
                                                                               2005         2005       vehicles
                                                                                produced)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1   TOYOTA..........................  TOYOTA TUNDRA PICKUP............          265       14,194      18.6699
   2   SUZUKI..........................  AERIO...........................           77       11,804       6.5232
   3   KIA.............................  RIO.............................          156       26,328       5.9253
   4   MERCEDES BENZ...................  215 (CL-CLASS)..................            9        1,601       5.6215
   5   JAGUAR..........................  XKR.............................            4          748       5.3476
   6   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CHEVROLET MONTE CARLO...........          188       35,876       5.2403
   7   MITSUBISHI......................  GALANT..........................          150       28,808       5.2069
   8   DAIMLERCHRYSLER.................  DODGE NEON......................          783      154,231       5.0768
   9   DAIMLERCHRYSLER.................  DODGE MAGNUM....................          387       79,254       4.8830
  10   DAIMLERCHRYSLER.................  CHRYSLER SEBRING................          242       49,892       4.8505
  11   DAIMLERCHRYSLER.................  DODGE STRATUS...................          452       94,735       4.7712
  12   KIA.............................  OPTIMA..........................          145       31,362       4.6234
  13   MITSUBISHI......................  LANCER..........................          141       31,226       4.5155
  14   NISSAN..........................  SENTRA..........................          519      116,354       4.4605
  15   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CHEVROLET MALIBU................          908      212,400       4.2750
  16   TOYOTA..........................  TOYOTA ECHO.....................           43       10,540       4.0797
  17   GENERAL MOTORS..................  PONTIAC GRAND AM................          248       61,502       4.0324
  18   TOYOTA..........................  LEXUS GS........................           12        3,004       3.9947
  19   SUZUKI..........................  FORENZA.........................          129       33,387       3.8638
  20   NISSAN..........................  INFINITI FX45...................            7        1,850       3.7838
  21   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CHEVROLET CAVALIER..............          351       95,838       3.6624
  22   HONDA...........................  ACURA RSX.......................           69       19,135       3.6060
  23   KIA.............................  SPECTRA.........................          191       53,027       3.6019
  24   HONDA...........................  S2000...........................           32        8,921       3.5870
  25   MASERATI........................  SPYDER/F1.......................            1          289       3.4602
  26   GENERAL MOTORS..................  PONTIAC SUNFIRE.................          132       38,239       3.4520
  27   DAIMLERCHRYSLER.................  CHRYSLER SEBRING CONVERTIBLE....          114       33,498       3.4032
  28   SUZUKI..........................  VITARA/GRAND VITARA.............           81       24,542       3.3005
  29   TOYOTA..........................  TOYOTA MR2 SPYDER...............            3          912       3.2895
  30   TOYOTA..........................  LEXUS IS........................           20        6,343       3.1531
  31   DAIMLERCHRYSLER.................  CHRYSLER 300....................          499      158,545       3.1474
  32   SUZUKI..........................  VERONA..........................           23        7,409       3.1043
  33   HYUNDAI.........................  ACCENT..........................          158       51,121       3.0907
  34   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CHEVROLET AVEO..................          196       64,250       3.0506
  35   HYUNDAI.........................  TIBURON.........................           46       15,100       3.0464
  36   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CHEVROLET IMPALA................          701      230,633       3.0395
  37   NISSAN..........................  350Z............................           82       27,146       3.0207
  38   MITSUBISHI......................  ECLIPSE.........................           25        8,471       2.9512
  39   FORD MOTOR CO...................  LINCOLN LS......................           64       21,743       2.9435
  40   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CHEVROLET COBALT................          410      140,975       2.9083

  41   NISSAN..........................  INFINITI QX56...................           36       12,666       2.8423
  42   NISSAN..........................  MAXIMA..........................          209       73,931       2.8270
  43   NISSAN..........................  ALTIMA..........................        1,035      368,779       2.8066
  44   MAZDA...........................  6...............................          191       68,252       2.7985
  45   SUZUKI..........................  RENO............................           16        5,736       2.7894
  46   TOYOTA..........................  SCION XB........................          187       67,396       2.7746
  47   SUBARU..........................  IMPREZA.........................          103       38,390       2.6830
  48   GENERAL MOTORS..................  PONTIAC GRAND PRIX..............          284      107,972       2.6303
  49   FORD MOTOR CO...................  FORD TAURUS.....................          527      201,826       2.6112
  50   FORD MOTOR CO...................  FORD FOCUS......................          637      245,780       2.5917
  51   TOYOTA..........................  TOYOTA CELICA...................           11        4,258       2.5834
  52   BMW.............................  M3..............................           14        5,471       2.5589
  53   GENERAL MOTORS..................  PONTIAC GTO.....................           28       11,065       2.5305
  54   ROLLS ROYCE.....................  PHANTOM.........................            1          399       2.5063
  55   FORD MOTOR CO...................  FORD MUSTANG....................          362      145,599       2.4863
  56   MITSUBISHI......................  OUTLANDER.......................           36       14,983       2.4027
  57   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CHEVROLET BLAZER S10/T10........           12        5,018       2.3914
  58   NISSAN..........................  INFINITI FX35...................           72       30,172       2.3863
  59   DAIMLERCHRYSLER.................  JEEP WRANGLER...................          178       74,706       2.3827
  60   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CADILLAC XLR....................            9        3,828       2.3511
  61   BMW.............................  6...............................           25       10,636       2.3505
  62   TOYOTA..........................  TOYOTA COROLLA..................          864      368,744       2.3431
  63   TOYOTA..........................  SCION TC........................          146       62,321       2.3427
  64   NISSAN..........................  FRONTIER PICKUP.................          146       62,799       2.3249
  65   MITSUBISHI......................  ENDEAVOR........................           46       20,871       2.2040
  66   HYUNDAI.........................  SONATA..........................          175       79,781       2.1935
  67   MAZDA...........................  B SERIES PICKUP.................           12        5,686       2.1104
  68   HYUNDAI.........................  ELANTRA.........................          277      132,495       2.0906
  69   MITSUBISHI......................  MONTERO.........................            8        3,829       2.0893
  70   GENERAL MOTORS..................  PONTIAC G6......................          128       62,481       2.0486
  71   NISSAN..........................  XTERRA..........................          113       55,179       2.0479
  72   KIA.............................  SEDONA VAN......................          156       76,527       2.0385
  73   FORD MOTOR CO...................  FORD RANGER PICKUP..............          209      103,723       2.0150
  74   VOLKSWAGEN......................  GOLF/GTI........................           29       14,447       2.0073
  75   HONDA...........................  CIVIC...........................          577      288,917       1.9971
  76   KIA.............................  SORENTO.........................          114       57,272       1.9905
  77   MERCEDES BENZ...................  203 (C-CLASS)...................          139       70,818       1.9628
  78   HONDA...........................  ACURA TSX.......................           70       35,836       1.9533
  79   ISUZU...........................  ASCENDER........................           14        7,219       1.9393
  80   MAZDA...........................  RX-8............................           34       17,608       1.9309
  81   KIA.............................  AMANTI..........................           43       22,858       1.8812
  82   TOYOTA..........................  SCION XA........................           60       32,132       1.8673
  83   TOYOTA..........................  TOYOTA TACOMA PICKUP............          283      151,776       1.8646
  84   JAGUAR..........................  XJ8/XJ8L........................            8        4,330       1.8476
  85   NISSAN..........................  INFINITI G35....................          120       65,227       1.8397
  86   JAGUAR..........................  S-TYPE..........................           25       13,629       1.8343
  87   MAZDA...........................  3...............................          158       86,184       1.8333
  88   DAIMLERCHRYSLER.................  CHRYSLER PT CRUISER.............          240      133,335       1.8000
  89   TOYOTA..........................  LEXUS SC........................           16        9,019       1.7740
  90   NISSAN..........................  INFINITI Q45....................            3        1,712       1.7523
  91   NISSAN..........................  PATHFINDER......................          143       82,667       1.7298
  92   MERCEDES BENZ...................  208 (CLK-CLASS).................           37       21,724       1.7032
  93   SUBARU..........................  BAJA............................           14        8,244       1.6982
  94   AUDI............................  A4/A4 QUATTRO/S4/S4 AVANT.......           80       47,470       1.6853
  95   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CHEVROLET TRAILBLAZER...........          311      184,671       1.6841
  96   TOYOTA..........................  TOYOTA CAMRY/SOLARA.............          732      437,173       1.6744
  97   NISSAN..........................  QUEST VAN.......................           60       35,913       1.6707
  98   GENERAL MOTORS..................  PONTIAC AZTEK...................           17       10,197       1.6672
  99   DAIMLERCHRYSLER.................  JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE.............          356      214,714       1.6580
 100   MERCEDES BENZ...................  170 (SLK-CLASS).................           17       10,310       1.6489
 101   GENERAL MOTORS..................  BUICK CENTURY...................           65       40,051       1.6229
 102   FORD MOTOR CO...................  FORD EXPLORER...................          317      196,740       1.6113
 103   FORD MOTOR CO...................  MERCURY SABLE...................           58       36,134       1.6051
 104   SAAB............................  9-2X............................            9        5,713       1.5754
 105   HONDA...........................  ACCORD..........................          576      371,940       1.5486
 106   FORD MOTOR CO...................  FORD EXPLORER SPORT TRAC........           83       53,640       1.5474
 107   HONDA...........................  ACURA 3.2 TL....................          125       82,497       1.5152

 108   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CHEVROLET COLORADO..............          206      136,994       1.5037
 109   BMW.............................  3...............................           88       58,554       1.5029
 110   BMW.............................  5...............................           42       28,346       1.4817
 111   FORD MOTOR CO...................  MERCURY MOUNTAINEER.............           48       32,416       1.4808
 112   GENERAL MOTORS..................  SATURN ION......................          104       71,021       1.4644
 113   DAIMLERCHRYSLER.................  CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE..............           36       24,679       1.4587
 114   GENERAL MOTORS..................  GMC ENVOY.......................          102       70,105       1.4550
 115   KIA.............................  SPORTAGE........................           35       24,351       1.4373
 116   GENERAL MOTORS..................  GMC CANYON PICKUP...............           56       39,149       1.4304
 117   FORD MOTOR CO...................  LINCOLN TOWN CAR................           67       46,853       1.4300
 118   MERCEDES BENZ...................  129 (SL-CLASS)..................           15       10,586       1.4170
 119   NISSAN..........................  MURANO..........................          102       72,482       1.4072
 120   TOYOTA..........................  TOYOTA MATRIX...................           99       72,719       1.3614
 121   HYUNDAI.........................  SANTA FE........................          100       73,979       1.3517
 122   HYUNDAI.........................  XG300...........................           27       20,099       1.3434
 123   GENERAL MOTORS..................  PONTIAC VIBE....................           95       71,357       1.3313
 124   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CADILLAC DEVILLE................           76       57,246       1.3276
 125   VOLKSWAGEN......................  JETTA...........................          116       87,710       1.3225
 126   AUDI............................  A8..............................            7        5,336       1.3118
 127   VOLKSWAGEN......................  PHAETON.........................            1          768       1.3021
 128   MAZDA...........................  TRIBUTE.........................           68       52,267       1.3010
 129   JAGUAR..........................  VANDEN PLAS/SUPER V8............            4        3,075       1.3008
 130   FORD MOTOR CO...................  FORD CROWN VICTORIA.............           24       18,754       1.2797
 131   FORD MOTOR CO...................  FORD FREESTAR VAN...............           92       72,690       1.2656
 132   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CHEVROLET ASTRO VAN.............           29       23,439       1.2373
 133   DAIMLERCHRYSLER.................  CHRYSLER PACIFICA...............          146      118,329       1.2338
 134   GENERAL MOTORS..................  PONTIAC BONNEVILLE..............           26       21,519       1.2082
 135   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CADILLAC CTS....................           74       61,323       1.2067
 136   BMW.............................  7...............................            9        7,495       1.2008
 137   DAIMLERCHRYSLER.................  DODGE CARAVAN/GRAND CARAVAN.....          440      367,439       1.1975
 138   TOYOTA..........................  TOYOTA 4RUNNER..................          127      106,810       1.1890
 139   DAIMLERCHRYSLER.................  DODGE VIPER.....................            2        1,692       1.1820
 140   HYUNDAI.........................  TUCSON..........................           71       61,346       1.1574
 141   ASTON MARTIN....................  DB9.............................            1          874       1.1442
 142   GENERAL MOTORS..................  GMC SAFARI VAN..................            5        4,441       1.1259
 143   FORD MOTOR CO...................  FORD FIVE HUNDRED...............          109       97,689       1.1158
 144   VOLVO...........................  V70.............................            9        8,070       1.1152
 145   MERCEDES BENZ...................  220 (S-CLASS)...................           13       11,831       1.0988
 146   FORD MOTOR CO...................  FORD THUNDERBIRD................           10        9,189       1.0883
 147   BMW.............................  X3..............................           31       28,657       1.0818
 148   TOYOTA..........................  LEXUS LS........................           31       29,049       1.0672
 149   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CHEVROLET EQUINOX...............          192      183,758       1.0449
 150   FORD MOTOR CO...................  FORD ESCAPE.....................          252      243,658       1.0342
 151   DAIMLERCHRYSLER.................  JEEP LIBERTY....................          178      173,110       1.0282
 152   TOYOTA..........................  LEXUS ES........................           83       80,735       1.0281
 153   TOYOTA..........................  LEXUS GX........................           28       27,260       1.0271
 154   TOYOTA..........................  TOYOTA AVALON...................           59       57,577       1.0247
 155   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CHEVROLET CORVETTE..............           34       33,810       1.0056
 156   GENERAL MOTORS..................  BUICK LESABRE...................          105      105,985       0.9907
 157   TOYOTA..........................  LEXUS RX........................           94       96,140       0.9777
 158   PORSCHE.........................  BOXSTER.........................            6        6,142       0.9769
 159   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CHEVROLET VENTURE VAN...........           24       25,341       0.9471
 160   ROLLS ROYCE.....................  BENTLEY CONTINENTAL.............            3        3,176       0.9446
 161   VOLVO...........................  S40.............................           24       25,722       0.9331
 162   TOYOTA..........................  TOYOTA RAV4.....................           75       82,037       0.9142
 163   BMW.............................  Z4..............................           10       11,079       0.9026
 164   HONDA...........................  ELEMENT.........................           47       52,440       0.8963
 165   FORD MOTOR CO...................  MERCURY MARINER.................           29       32,734       0.8859
 166   GENERAL MOTORS..................  SATURN LS.......................            6        6,790       0.8837
 167   FORD MOTOR CO...................  MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS...........           61       69,862       0.8731
 168   TOYOTA..........................  TOYOTA HIGHLANDER...............          113      130,146       0.8683
 169   GENERAL MOTORS..................  BUICK PARK AVENUE...............            8        9,282       0.8619
 170   GENERAL MOTORS..................  SATURN VUE......................           56       65,105       0.8601
 171   VOLKSWAGEN......................  PASSAT..........................           30       35,149       0.8535
 172   PORSCHE.........................  911.............................            7        8,391       0.8342
 173   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CADILLAC STS....................           31       37,226       0.8328
 174   TOYOTA..........................  TOYOTA SIENNA VAN...............          144      172,999       0.8324

 175   GENERAL MOTORS..................  BUICK LACROSSE/ALLURE...........           68       81,894       0.8303
 176   LAND ROVER......................  FREELANDER......................            2        2,441       0.8193
 177   MAZDA...........................  MPV VAN.........................           15       18,902       0.7936
 178   HONDA...........................  ACURA 3.5 RL....................           17       21,526       0.7897
 179   VOLKSWAGEN......................  NEW BEETLE......................           27       34,410       0.7847
 180   AUDI............................  A6/A6 QUATTRO/S6/S6 AVANT.......           12       15,432       0.7776
 181   DAIMLERCHRYSLER.................  CHRYSLER TOWN & COUNTRY.........          195      253,162       0.7703
 182   GENERAL MOTORS..................  BUICK RENDEZVOUS................           42       54,775       0.7668
 183   VOLVO...........................  XC90............................           33       43,213       0.7637
 184   FORD MOTOR CO...................  MERCURY MONTEREY VAN............            5        6,703       0.7459
 185   MERCEDES BENZ...................  210 (E-CLASS)...................           30       40,445       0.7417
 186   VOLVO...........................  S80.............................            8       10,918       0.7327
 187   GENERAL MOTORS..................  BUICK RAINIER...................           10       13,648       0.7327
 188   VOLVO...........................  S60.............................           15       23,029       0.6514
 189   BMW.............................  MINI COOPER.....................           30       47,444       0.6323
 190   HONDA...........................  CR-V............................           88      144,472       0.6091
 191   SAAB............................  9-3.............................           13       21,433       0.6065
 192   LOTUS...........................  ELISE...........................            2        3,320       0.6024
 193   SUBARU..........................  LEGACY/OUTBACK..................           21       34,944       0.6010
 194   AUDI............................  ALLROAD QUATTRO.................            2        3,420       0.5848
 195   HONDA...........................  ACURA MDX.......................           35       60,287       0.5806
 196   HONDA...........................  PILOT...........................           81      142,118       0.5699
 197   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CHEVROLET UPLANDER VAN..........           30       52,713       0.5691
 198   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CADILLAC SRX....................           13       23,498       0.5532
 199   FORD MOTOR CO...................  FORD FREESTYLE..................           40       75,643       0.5288
 200   HONDA...........................  ODYSSEY VAN.....................           85      161,742       0.5255
 201   FORD MOTOR CO...................  FORD GT.........................            1        1,907       0.5244
 202   SAAB............................  9-7X............................            1        1,999       0.5003
 203   MAZDA...........................  MX-5 MIATA......................            2        4,135       0.4837
 204   SUBARU..........................  FORESTER........................           24       50,942       0.4711
 205   FORD MOTOR CO...................  MERCURY MONTEGO.................           13       28,517       0.4559
 206   GENERAL MOTORS..................  PONTIAC MONTANA VAN.............           14       31,583       0.4433
 207   TOYOTA..........................  TOYOTA PRIUS....................           46      121,020       0.3801
 208   SUBARU..........................  OUTBACK.........................           29       79,980       0.3626
 209   JAGUAR..........................  X-TYPE..........................            4       11,299       0.3540
 210   GENERAL MOTORS..................  SATURN RELAY....................            6       17,794       0.3372
 211   SAAB............................  9-5.............................            2        6,137       0.3259
 212   VOLVO...........................  V50.............................            2        6,909       0.2895
 213   GENERAL MOTORS..................  BUICK TERRAZA VAN...............            2       19,848       0.1008
 214   MASERATI........................  GRANSPORT.......................            0          490       0.0000
 215   MASERATI........................  QUATTROPORTE....................            0        1,311       0.0000
 216   HONDA...........................  ACURA NSX.......................            0          249       0.0000
 217   ASTON MARTIN....................  VANQUISH........................            0          165       0.0000
 218   AUDI............................  TT..............................            0        3,375       0.0000
 219   ROLLS ROYCE.....................  BENTLEY ARNAGE..................            0          361       0.0000
 220   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CADILLAC FUNERAL COACH/HEARSE...            0          854       0.0000
 221   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CADILLAC LIMOUSINE..............            0          472       0.0000
 222   FERRARI.........................  MARANELLO/F1....................            0          235       0.0000
 223   FERRARI.........................  SCAGLIETTI/F1...................            0          228       0.0000
 224   FERRARI.........................  SPIDER/F1.......................            0        1,093       0.0000
 225   GENERAL MOTORS..................  CHEVROLET CLASSIC...............            0       83,060       0.0000
 226   GENERAL MOTORS..................  GMC K2500.......................            0           51       0.0000
 227   HONDA...........................  INSIGHT.........................            0          591       0.0000
 228   JAGUAR..........................  XJR.............................            0          741       0.0000
 229   JAGUAR..........................  XK8.............................            0        1,760       0.0000
 230   NISSAN..........................  ARMADA..........................            0       34,803       0.0000
 231   NISSAN..........................  TITAN...........................            0       77,628       0.0000
 232   SPYKER..........................  C8..............................            0            7       0.0000
 233   VOLVO...........................  XC70............................            0       14,806       0.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued on: October 5, 2007.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 07-5022 Filed 10-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-59-P