[Federal Register: January 12, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 8)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 1994-1996]
[DOCID:fr12ja06-25]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2005-0563, FRL-8020-9]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Wisconsin;
Wisconsin Construction Permit Permanency SIP Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Wisconsin State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Wisconsin on
December 8, 2005. Wisconsin has submitted for approval into its SIP a
statutory provision designed to ensure the permanency of construction
permit conditions. EPA is proposing to approve this revision because it
is consistent with Federal regulations governing State permit programs.
This revision also addresses one of the deficiencies identified in
EPA's Notice of Deficiency (NOD), published in the Federal Register on
March 4, 2004. (69 FR 10167.)

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 13,
2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2005-0563, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line

instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air Permit Section, (AR-18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604.
     Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air Permit Section,
(AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. excluding Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2005-0563. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site

is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be

automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional instructions on submitting
comments, go to Section I of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.

http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some

information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. We recommend that you telephone Susan Siepkowski,
Environmental Engineer, at<PHONE_NUMBER>, before visiting the Region 5
office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Siepkowski, Environmental
Engineer, Air Permit Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
II. Background Information for This Action
III. What Has Wisconsin Submitted?
IV. Does This Submittal Comply With Federal Requirements?
V. What Action is EPA Taking Today?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    A. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of

the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk
or CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM
as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI). In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    B. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    1. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    2. Follow directions--The EPA may ask you to respond to specific
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    3. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    4. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    5. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    6. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
    7. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    8. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.

II. Background Information for This Action

    On March 4, 2004, EPA published a Notice of Deficiency for the
Clean Air Act (Act) Operating Permit Program in Wisconsin. (69 FR
10167). The NOD was based upon EPA's findings that the State's title V
program did not comply with the requirements of the Act or with the
implementing regulations at 40 CFR part 70.
    One of the deficiencies raised in the NOD was related to the
expiration of Wisconsin's construction permits. 40 CFR 70.1 requires
that each title V source has a permit that assures compliance with all
applicable requirements, including any term or condition of any
preconstruction permit issued pursuant to programs approved or
promulgated under title I, including parts C or D of the Act. Title I
of the Act authorizes permitting authorities to establish in permits
source specific terms and conditions necessary for sources to comply
with the requirements of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) and New Source Review (NSR) programs. These permits must remain
in effect because they are the legal mechanism through which underlying
NSR or PSD requirements become applicable, and remain applicable, to
individual sources. (May 20, 1999, EPA Memorandum from John Seitz). If
the underlying construction permit expires, then the construction
permit terms would no longer be applicable requirements to the source.
Additionally, 40 CFR 52.21, the federal regulation governing the PSD
program, provides at 52.21(w)(1), ``[a]ny permit issued under this
section or a prior version of this section shall remain in effect,
unless and until it expires under paragraph (s) of this section or is
rescinded.''
    Wisconsin statutes, Wis. Stat. 285.66(1), had provided that
construction permits expire after 18 months. Consequently, EPA
identified this as an issue in the NOD. Wis. Stat. 285.66 was
previously numbered Wis. Stat 144.396 and had been approved into
Wisconsin's SIP on June 25, 1986 (51 FR 23056), prior to EPA's approval
of Wisconsin's Nonattainment NSR program (January 18, 1995, 60 FR 3538)
and Wisconsin's PSD program (64 FR 28745, May 27, 1999).

III. What Has Wisconsin Submitted?

    On December 8, 2005, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
(WDNR) submitted to EPA for approval, the SIP revision ``Request to the
EPA to Revise Wisconsin's SIP Pertaining to the Permanency of
Construction Permit Conditions.'' Wisconsin has revised its statutes to
make permanent all conditions in construction permits. Wisconsin has
revised Statute 285.66(1) to provide that, ``[n]otwithstanding the fact
that authorization to construct, reconstruct, replace, or modify a
source expires under this subsection, all conditions in a construction
permit are permanent unless the conditions are revised through a
revision of the construction permit or through the issuance of a new
construction permit.'' This revision was adopted as part of the
Wisconsin 2005-07 biennial budget bill enacted into law as 2005
Wisconsin Act 25. (Published July 26, 2005.)

IV. Does This Submittal Comply With Federal Requirements?

    EPA reviewed Wisconsin's December 8, 2005, SIP revision submittal
to determine completeness, in accordance with the completeness criteria
set out at 40 CFR part 51, appendix V, and found the submittal to be
complete. The next step in the review process was EPA's analysis of the
State's submittal for compliance with Federal program requirements.
    Wisconsin's SIP revision is necessary to correct a deficiency
identified in the March 4, 2004 NOD. As noted in the March 4, 2004 NOD,
title V generally does not impose new substantive air quality control
requirements. Therefore, to be included in a title V permit, applicable
requirements, such as terms in previously issued construction permits,
must exist independent of the

title V permit. EPA's approval of this SIP revision will ensure that
construction permit terms are included as applicable requirements in
Wisconsin's title V permits, and will satisfy the deficiency identified
in the NOD. Therefore, EPA has determined that this revision is
approvable.

V. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?

    EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Wisconsin SIP which
will make permanent all terms of Wisconsin's permits to construct,
reconstruct, replace or modify sources unless the terms are revised
through a revision of the construction permit or issuance of a new
construction permit. EPA is also soliciting comment on this proposed
approval.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews. Executive Order 12866;
Regulatory Planning and Review

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, September 30, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This proposed rule does not impose an information collection burden
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    This proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator
certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Because this rule proposes to approve pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty
beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).

Executive Order 13132--Federalism

    This action also does not have Federalism implications because it
does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This action merely proposes to approve a state rule
implementing a federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act.

Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments

    This proposed rule also does not have tribal implications because
it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

Executive Order 13045--Protection of Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks

    This proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.

Executive Order 13211--Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use

    Because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866 or a ``significant energy action,'' this action
is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).

National Technology Transfer Advancement Act

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), 15 U.S.C. 272, requires Federal agencies to use
technical standards that are developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus to carry out policy objectives, so long as such standards are
not inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. In
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Absent a
prior existing requirement for the state to use voluntary consensus
standards, EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use such standards, and it would thus be inconsistent with
applicable law for EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in place of
a program submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the
Clean Air Act. Therefore, the requirements of section 12(d) of the NTTA
do not apply.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by Reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Date: January 4, 2006.
Gary Gulezian,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
 [FR Doc. E6-227 Filed 1-11-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 10, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1251-1252]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00275]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Application

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Questar Southern Trails Pipeline Company................     CP18-39-000
Navajo Tribal Utility Authority.........................     CP18-40-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that on December 22, 2017, Questar Southern Trails
Pipeline Company (QST), 333 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah
84111, filed an application, in Docket No. CP18-39-000, pursuant to
section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) seeking authority to abandon:
(i) Its certificate of public convenience and necessity, (ii) its Part
284 blanket certificate, and (iii) its blanket certificate issued under
Part 157, Subpart F of the Commission's regulations. QST also requests
authority to abandon, part by sale and part in-place, all of its
certificated facilities dedicated to providing jurisdictional
transportation service including approximately 488 miles of natural gas
pipeline and related facilities located in California, Arizona, Utah,
and New Mexico.
    Also, take notice that on December 22, 2017, the Navajo Tribal
Utility Authority (NTUA), P.O. Box 170, Fort Defiance, Arizona 86504,
filed an application, in docket No. CP18-40-000, pursuant to Section
7(f) of the NGA and Part 157 of the Commission's regulations,
requesting: (i) A service area determination within which NTUA may,
without further Commission authorization, enlarge or expand its natural
gas distribution facilities and (ii) a waiver of all reporting,
accounting, and other rules and regulations normally applicable to
natural gas companies.
    QST states that it cannot economically justify continued operation
of its system. Therefore, QST entered into an agreement with NTUA to
sell those portions of the QST Facilities that are useful for natural
gas distribution service to NTUA. NTUA will utilize those acquired
facilities to provide its own service replacing the service
historically provided to it by QST. The remaining facilities not sold
to the NTUA will be abandoned in-place.
    Specifically, QST proposes to abandon by sale to NTUA approximately
268 miles of its interstate pipeline, three compressor stations, and
related facilities in San Juan County, New Mexico and Apache and
Coconino Counties, Arizona.
    QST proposes to abandon in-place all the QST Facilities not being
transferred to the NTUA, consisting of approximately 220 miles of 16-
inch-diameter pipeline, and related facilities, extending from Coconino
County, Arizona to the terminus of the certificated pipeline in San
Bernardino County, California. QST will maintain all the facilities
abandoned in-place in anticipation of a future sale or repurpose, all
as more fully set forth in the applications which are on file with the
Commission and open to public inspection. The filing is available for
review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed
on the Commission's website web at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at [email protected] or call toll-
free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions regarding the CP18-39-000 application should be
directed to L. Bradley Burton, Director-Regulatory, Certificates &
Tariffs, Dominion Energy Questar Corp., 333 South State Street, P.O.
Box 45360, Salt Lake City, Utah 84145-0360, by telephone at (801) 324-
2459, or by email to [email protected].
    Any questions regarding the CP18-40-000 application should be
directed to Jeffrey K. Janicke, McCarter & English, LLP, 1015 15th
Street NW, 12th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, by telephone at (202) 735-
3403; or by email to [email protected].
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules (18 CFR 157.9),
within 90 days of this Notice, the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for these proceedings; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the EA for this proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's
public record for these proceedings or the issuance of a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and
state agencies of the timing for the completion of all necessary
reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations
within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
these projects. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of

all documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party
must submit five copies of filings made with the Commission and must
mail a copy to the applicant and to every other party in the
proceeding. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to these
projects. The Commission will consider these comments in determining
the appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone
will not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The
Commission's rules require that persons filing comments in opposition
to the project provide copies of their protests only to the party or
parties directly involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at
http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and five copies of the protest or intervention to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 24, 2018.

    Dated: January 3, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-00275 Filed 1-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 47832]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19617]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG12-86-000.
    Applicants: Chisholm View Wind Project, LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of EG or FC of Chisholm View Wind
Project, LLC.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5125.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER07-543-002.
    Applicants: Linden VFT, LLC.
    Description: Open Season Report of Linden VFT, LLC.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5129.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2547-006.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, In
    Description: Rvsd Implmnttn Dt 15 Mnt Vrbl Schdlng PJM Prxy Gnrtr
Bs to be effective 6/27/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120712-5117.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4628-001.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance Filing per 5/14/2012 Order in ER11-4628
versions to be effective 5/15/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5105.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4628-002.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance Filing per 5/14/2012 Order in ER11-4628-
Versions to be effective 6/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5114.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4628-003.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance Filing per 5/14/2012 Order in ER11-4628-
Versions to be effective 7/18/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5123.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1870-001.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Mexico.
    Description: Compliance Filing for 2nd Revised PNM/HLM TSA to be
effective 3/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120712-5043.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1873-001.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System.
    Description: Consumers-METC DTIA Compliance (7-13-2012) to be
effective 6/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5104.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2203-001.
    Applicants: GUSC Energy Inc.
    Description: Amendment to July 3, 2012 MBR Application Filing to be
effective 9/4/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5130.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2236-000.
    Applicants: ITC Great Plains, LLC.
    Description: Initial Filing Lease Agreement to be effective 9/1/
2012.
    Filed Date: 7/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120712-5099.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2237-000.
    Applicants: Dunkirk Power LLC.
    Description: Unexecuted Cost of Service Agreement with National
Grid for RMR Service to be effective 9/11/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120712-5126.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2238-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., American Electric Power
Service Corporation.
    Description: AEPSC submits 33rd Revised SA No. 1336 among AEPSC &
Buckeye to be effective 5/10/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5045.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2239-000.
    Applicants: Linden VFT, LLC.
    Description: Request for Limited Waiver of Schedule 16 of PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.'s Open Access Transmission Tariff of Linden
VFT, LLC in ER12-2239.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5065.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2240-000.
    Applicants: ALLETE, Inc.
    Description: Revised MBR Tariff Filing to be effective 7/14/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120713-5074.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/3/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 13, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-19617 Filed 8-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 14, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 114)]
[Notices]
[Page 32841-32842]
[DOCID:fr14jn07-36]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP07-390-000; CP07-391-000; CP07-392-000]

Enstor Houston Hub Storage and Transportation, LP; Notice of
Application Filing

June 7, 2007.
    Take notice that on May 24, 2007, Enstor Houston Hub Storage and
Transportation, LP (Houston Hub), 20333 State Highway 249, Suite 400,
Houston, Texas 77070, filed an application in Docket Nos. CP07-390-000,
CP07-391-000, and CP07-392-000 pursuant to section 7(c) of the Natural
Gas Act for a certificate of public convenience and necessity
authorizing Houston Hub to construct, own, operate, and maintain a new
underground natural gas storage facility in Liberty County, Texas.
Houston Hub also requests a blanket certificate pursuant to Subpart G
of 18 CFR part 284 and a blanket certificate pursuant to Subpart F of
18 CFR part 157. Lastly, Houston Hub seeks authority to provide the
proposed storage and storage-related services at market based rates.
This filing is available for review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov
 using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number

excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,

contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions regarding this Application should be directed to
Joseph H. Fagan, Heller Ehrman LLP, 1717 Rhode Island Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20036-3001 at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by fax at (202) 912-
2020.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding, or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the below listed comment date, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this

project should submit an original and two copies of their comments to
the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    Motions to intervene, protests and comments may be filed
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.
    Comment Date: June 28, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-11464 Filed 6-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P