[Federal Register: July 10, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 133)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 39572-39574]
[DOCID:fr10jy08-3]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0256; Directorate Identifier 2007-SW-01-AD;
Amendment 39-15597; AD 2008-14-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Agusta S.p.A. Model AB 139 and AW 139
Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Agusta
S.p.A. Model AB 139 and AW 139 helicopters. This AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), the Technical Agent for Italy,
with which we have a bilateral agreement, which indicates that the
Agusta AB 139's and AW 139's Fuselage Frame 5700 middle section is
prone to fatigue damage. The actions are intended to detect cracks in
the fuselage frame structure and to prevent structural failure in this
area.

DATES: This AD becomes effective on August 14, 2008.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications is approved
by the Director of the Federal Register as of August 14, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations office, U.S.
Department of Transportation, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m. Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    You may get the service information identified in this AD from
Agusta, 21017 Cascina Costa di Samarate (VA) Italy, Via Giovanni Agusta
520, telephone 39 (0331) 229111, fax 39 (0331)<PHONE_NUMBER>95.
    Examining the AD Docket: The AD docket contains the NPRM, the
economic evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The
street address and operating hours for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) are in the ADDRESSES section of this AD.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after they are
received.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Miles, Aviation Safety
Engineer,

FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and Guidance Group, Fort
Worth, Texas 76193-0111, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to Agusta S.p.A. Model AB 139
and AW 139 helicopters. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register
on March 7, 2008 (73 FR 12299). That NPRM proposed to require
repetitive inspections of the fuselage frame structure for a crack, and
if a crack is found, repairing the crack before further flight in
accordance with an FAA-approved procedure. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI and any related service information
in the AD docket.

Comments

    By publishing the NPRM, we gave the public an opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. However, we received no comment on
the NPRM or on our determination of the cost to the public. Therefore,
based on our review and evaluation of the available data, we have
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD as proposed except for some formatting changes. These changes will
neither increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the
scope of this AD.

Relevant Service Information

    Agusta S.p.A. has issued Bollettino Tecnico No. 139-018, Revision
B, dated October 18, 2006. The actions described in the MCAI are
intended to correct the same unsafe condition as that identified in the
service information.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI AD

    This AD differs from the MCAI in that the MCAI states ``When damage
or cracks are found, before next flight, contact the TC Holder for
further instructions.'' This AD requires repairing the crack before
further flight in accordance with an FAA-approved procedure if a crack
is found. Also, this AD requires that the inspection be performed based
on ``hours time-in-service'' rather than ``flight hours,'' as stated in
the MCAI.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect about 17 helicopters of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per
helicopter to comply with the initial and each subsequent recurring
inspection required by this AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-
hour. Assuming that 3 recurring inspections will be performed on each
of the affected helicopters every year after the initial inspection,
and that 2 of the affected helicopters will require repairs to the
fuselage middle frame section at $10,000 per repair during the service
life of these helicopters, we estimate the cost of this AD as follows:
     Initial Inspection Costs: 1 x 80 x 17 = $1360.
     Subsequent Recurring Inspection Costs over the next 20
years: 1 x 3 x 20 x 80 x 17 = $81,600.
     Repair Costs: 2 x 10,000 = $20,000.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators to be $102,960, or $6,056 per helicopter.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on helicopters identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    Therefore, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends 39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2008-14-02 Agusta S.p.A.: Amendment 39-15597. Docket No. FAA-2008-
0256; Directorate Identifier 2007-SW-01-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective on
August 14, 2008.

Other Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Agusta S.p.A. Model AB 139 and AW 139
helicopters, certificated in any category.

Reason

    (d) This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), the Technical Agent for Italy, with which we have a
bilateral agreement, which indicates that the Agusta AB/AW 139's
Fuselage Frame 5700 middle section is prone to fatigue damage. These
fatigue cracks constitute an unsafe condition. The actions are
intended to detect cracks in the fuselage frame structure and to
prevent structural failure in this area.

Actions and Compliance

    (e) Required as indicated, unless already done.
    (1) Within the next 10 hours time-in-service (TIS), or upon
accumulating 100 hours TIS since new, whichever occurs later,
inspect the fuselage frame 5700 middle section in accordance with
the Compliance Instructions, pargraphs 1. through 4., of Agusta
Bollettino Tecnico No. 139-018, Revision B, dated October 18, 2006;
    (2) Thereafter, at intervals not exceeding 100 hours TIS, repeat
the inspection as required by paragraph (e)(1) of this AD.
    (3) If a crack is found, before further flight, repair the crack
in accordance with an FAA-approved procedure.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI AD

    (f) This AD differs from the MCAI as follows:
    (1) The MCAI states ``When damage or cracks are found, before
next flight, contact the TC Holder for further instructions.'' If a
crack is found, this AD requires repairing the crack before further
flight in accordance with an FAA-approved procedure.
    (2) This AD requires that the inspection be performed based on
``hours time-in-service'' not ``flight hours.''

Other Information

    (g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Safety Management Group, FAA, FAA, ATTN: Sharon Miles, Aviation
Safety Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and
Guidance Group, Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0111, telephone (817) 222-
5122, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

Related Information

    (h) European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness
Directive No. 2006-0357, dated November 29, 2006, contains related
information.

Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Tracking Code

    (i) ATA Code 5700: Fuselage frame middle section.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (j) You must use the specified portions of Agusta Bollettino
Tecnico No. 139-018, Revision B, dated October 18, 2006, to do the
actions required.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Agusta, 21017 Cascina Costa di Samarate (VA) Italy, Via Giovanni
Agusta 520, telephone 39 (0331) 229111, fax 39 (0331)<PHONE_NUMBER>95.
    (3) You may review copies at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas
76193; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/
federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on June 19, 2008.
Judy Carl,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-14720 Filed 7-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


GroupWise WebAccess Message Item Mail Message Print View  Forwarded by Carey Johnston/ DC/ USEPA/ US on 07/ 01/ 2004 08: 54 AM

Bob < walden@ waldeninc To: Carey Johnston/ DC/ USEPA/ US@ EPA . com> cc:

Subject: RE: SBR unit at the tobacco processing plant in 06/ 30/ 2004 05: 04 Malang PM Sorry for the delay in responding. I have no performance info from this plant. Costs for our systems range from $ 43k for an 8k gpd plant to $ 320k for a 100k gpd plant. Options include nutrient removal, disinfection, sludge waste and sludge holding. I have attached a set of test results from a Shopping center in Wickford, RI. and a 12k gpd unit on a condo in Aspen, CO. If you need more contact me. Bob Johnson President www. waldeninc. com  Original Message From: Johnston. Carey@ epamail. epa. gov [ mailto: Johnston. Carey@ epamail. epa. gov] Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 1: 38 PM To: walden@ waldeninc. com Cc: Wall. Tom@ epamail. epa. gov Subject: SBR unit at the tobacco processing plant in Malang Dear Bob:

If possible, please send me more detailed costs and performance data for your SBR unit at the tobacco processing plant in Malang ( see http:// www. waldeninc. com/ malang. htm). Thanks! Sincerely,

Carey A. Johnston, P. E. U. S. EPA, Office of Water ph: ( 202) 566 1014 fx: ( 202) 566 1053 johnston. carey@ epa. gov ( See attached file: Wickford Junction. lab results. xls)( See attached file: Riverbend results. xls)


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60123-60124]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23787]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0592; FRL-9917-01-Region 9]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Imperial
County Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District
(ICAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP).
These revisions concern oxides of nitrogen (NOX) emissions
from wallboard kilns and internal combustion engines. We are proposing
to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the
Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by November 5, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2014-0592, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of

encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901.
While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be
publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Idalia Perez, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3248<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local
rules: Rule 400.3, Internal Combustion Engine(s), and Rule 400.4,
Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Wallboard Kilns. In the Rules and
Regulations section of this Federal Register, we are approving these
local rules in a direct final action without prior proposal because we
believe these SIP revisions are not controversial. If we receive
adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule and address the comments in subsequent action based
on this proposed rule. Please note that if we receive adverse comment
on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
    We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
information, please see the direct final action.

    Dated: August 20, 2014.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2014-23787 Filed 10-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 105 (Monday, June 1, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33183-33185]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11724]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2020-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2034]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Federal
Regulations. The LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will be finalized on the dates
listed in the table below and

revise the FIRM panels and FIS report in effect prior to this
determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Chief executive officer of                                      Online location of letter of map                          Community
         State and county          Location and case No.             community               Community map repository                   revision               Date of modification      No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colorado: Broomfield.............  City and County of     The Honorable Patrick Quinn,    Engineering Department, 1       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         July 6, 2020........       085073
                                    Broomfield (19-08-     Mayor, City and County of       DesCombes Drive, Broomfield,    advanceSearch.
                                    1004P).                Broomfield, 1 DesCombes         CO 80020.
                                                           Drive, Broomfield, CO 80020.
Florida: Collier.................  Unincorporated areas   Mr. Burt L. Saunders,           Collier County Growth           https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jul. 14, 2020.......       120067
                                    of Collier County,     Chairman, Collier County        Management Department, 2800     advanceSearch.
                                    (19-04-6241P).         Board of Commissioners, 3299    North Horseshoe Drive,
                                                           Tamiami Trail East, Suite       Naples, FL 34104.
                                                           303, Naples, FL 34112.
New Mexico: Lea..................  City of Hobbs, (19-06- The Honorable Sam D. Cobb,      Engineering Department, 200     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jul. 16, 2020.......       350029
                                    2692P)                 Mayor, City of Hobbs, 200       East Broadway Street, Hobbs,    advanceSearch.
                                                           East Broadway Street, Hobbs,    NM 88240.
                                                           NM 88240.
Texas:
    Kendall......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Darrel L. Lux,    Kendall County Engineering      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jul. 13, 2020.......       480417
                                    of Kendall County      Kendall County Judge, 201       Department, 201 East San        advanceSearch.
                                    (19-06-2757P).         East San Antonio Avenue,        Antonio Avenue, Suite 122,
                                                           Suite 122, Boerne, TX 78006.    Boerne, TX 78001.
    Kerr.........................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Rob Kelly, Kerr   Kerr County Engineering         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jul. 13, 2020.......       480419
                                    of Kerr County (19-    County Judge, 700 East Main     Department, 3766 State          advanceSearch.
                                    06-2757P).             Street, Kerrville, TX 78028.    Highway 27, Kerrville, TX
                                                                                78028.
    McLennan.....................  City of Lacy Lakeview  The Honorable Sharon Clark,     City Hall, 501 East Craven      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jul. 20, 2020.......       480927
                                    (20-06-0788P).         Mayor, City of Lacy Lakeview,   Avenue, Lacy Lakeview, TX       advanceSearch.
                                                           501 East Craven Avenue, Lacy    76705.
                                                           Lakeview, TX 76705.
    McLennan.....................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Scott M. Felton,  McLennan County Engineering     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jul. 20, 2020.......       480456
                                    of McLennan County     McLennan County Judge, 501      and Mapping Department, 215     advanceSearch.
                                    (20-06-0788P).         Washington Avenue, Suite 214,   North 5th Street, Suite 130,
                                                           Waco, TX 76701.                 Waco, TX 76701.

    Tarrant......................  City of Grapevine (19- The Honorable William D. Tate,  City Hall, 200 South Main       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jul. 20, 2020.......       480598
                                    06-2895P).             Mayor, City of Grapevine,       Street, Grapevine, TX 76099.    advanceSearch.
                                                           P.O. Box 95104, Grapevine, TX
                                                           76099.
    Tarrant......................  Town of Flower Mound,  The Honorable Steve Dixon,      Town Hall, 2121 Cross Timbers   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jul. 20, 2020.......       480777
                                    (19-06-2895P).         Mayor, Town of Flower Mound,    Road, Flower Mound, TX 75028.   advanceSearch.
                                                           2121 Cross Timbers Road,
                                                           Flower Mound, TX 75028.
Wyoming:
    Laramie......................  City of Cheyenne (19-  The Honorable Marian J. Orr,    Planning and Development        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jul. 8 2020.........       560030
                                    08-0688P).             Mayor, City of Cheyenne, 2101   Department, 2101 O'Neil         advanceSearch.
                                                           O'Neil Avenue, Cheyenne, WY     Avenue, Cheyenne, WY 82001.
                                                           82001.
    Laramie......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Gunnar Malm,      Laramie County Public Works     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jul. 8 2020.........       560029
                                    of Laramie County      Chairman, Laramie County        Department, 13797 Prairie       advanceSearch.
                                    (19-08-0688P).         Board of Commissioners, 310     Center Circle, Cheyenne, WY
                                                           West 19th Street, Suite 300,    82001.
                                                           Cheyenne, WY 82001.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2020-11724 Filed 5-29-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register: April 24, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 78)]
[Notices]
[Page 18767]
[DOCID:fr24ap09-106]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59789; File No. SR-FINRA-2009-009]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Adopt FINRA
Rule 1122 (Filing of Misleading Information as to Membership or
Registration) in the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook

April 20, 2009.
    On March 3, 2009, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') (f/k/a National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(``NASD'')), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'' or ``SEC''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to adopt NASD IM-1000-1 as FINRA
Rule 1122 in the consolidated FINRA rulebook (``Consolidated FINRA
Rulebook'') \3\ without material change. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on March 19, 2009.\4\ The
Commission received no comment letters in response to the proposed rule
change. This order approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ The current FINRA rulebook consists of two sets of rules:
(1) NASD Rules and (2) rules incorporated from NYSE (``Incorporated
NYSE Rules'') (together referred to as the ``Transitional
Rulebook''). The Incorporated NYSE Rules apply only to those members
of FINRA that are also members of the NYSE (``Dual Members''). Dual
members must also comply with NASD Rules. For more information about
the rulebook consolidation process, see FINRA Information Notice,
March 12, 2008 (``Rulebook Consolidation Process'').
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59563 (March 12,
2009), 74 FR 11792.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NASD IM-1000-1 provides that the filing of membership or
registration information as a Registered Representative with FINRA
which is incomplete or inaccurate so as to be misleading, or which
could in any way tend to mislead, or the failure to correct such filing
after notice thereof, may be deemed conduct inconsistent with just and
equitable principles of trade and may be subject to disciplinary
action. The proposed rule change renumbers NASD IM-1000-1 as FINRA Rule
1122 in the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook and clarifies its applicability
to members and persons associated with members by specifying that ``no
member or person associated with a member'' shall file incomplete or
misleading membership or registration information. FINRA also
eliminates the reference to the filing of registration information ``as
a Registered Representative'' to clarify that the rule applies to the
filing of registration information regarding any category of
registration. In addition, FINRA deletes the reference that the
prohibited conduct may be deemed inconsistent with just and equitable
principles of trade and subject to disciplinary action as unnecessary
and to better reflect the proposed adoption of the NASD IM as a stand-
alone FINRA rule.
    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act, and the rules
and regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities
association,\5\ and in particular, with Section 15A(b)(6) of the
Act,\6\ which requires, among other things, that FINRA rules be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. FINRA's adoption of NASD IM-
1000-1 as FINRA Rule 1122 in the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook clarifies
its applicability and provides notice to members of behavior that
violates just and equitable principles of trade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered
the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\7\ that the proposed rule change (SR-FINRA-2009-009) be, and
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. E9-9386 Filed 4-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53159-53161]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20954]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2010-0037]

Standard for Welding, Cutting, and Brazing; Extension of the
Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information
Collection (Paperwork) Requirements

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comments concerning its proposal to
extend the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) approval of the
information collection requirements contained in the Standard for
Welding, Cutting, and Brazing (29 CFR Part 1910, Subpart Q). The
information collected is used by employers and workers whenever
welding, cutting, and brazing are performed. The purpose of the
information is to ensure that employers evaluate hazards associated
with welding and ensure that adequate measures are taken to make the
process safe.

DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by
October 28, 2013.

ADDRESSES:
    Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting
comments.
    Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer

than 10 pages, you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
    Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service:
When using this method, you must submit a copy of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, OSHA Docket No. OSHA-2010-0037,
U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210. Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger, and courier
service) are accepted during the Department of Labor's and Docket
Office's normal business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number (OSHA-2010-0037) for the Information Collection Request
(ICR). All comments, including any personal information you provide,
are placed in the public docket without change, and may be made
available online at http://www.regulations.gov. For further information
on submitting comments see the ``Public Participation'' heading in the
section of this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at
the address above. All documents in the docket (including this Federal
Register notice) are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index;
however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly
available to read or download from the Web site. All submissions,
including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and
copying at the OSHA Docket Office. You may also contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of the ICR.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theda Kenney or Todd Owen, Directorate
of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-3609,
200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 693-
2044.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information
collection requirements in accord with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (PRA-95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that
information is in the desired format, reporting burden (time and costs)
is minimal, collection instruments are clearly understood, and OSHA's
estimate of the information collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651
et seq.) authorizes information collection by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the OSH Act or for developing
information regarding the causes and prevention of occupational
injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also
requires OSHA to obtain such information with minimum burden upon
employers, especially those operating small businesses, and to reduce
to the maximum extent feasible unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
    Section 1910.255(e) requires that a periodic inspection of
resistance welding equipment be made by qualified maintenance
personnel, and that a certification record be generated and maintained.
The certification shall include the date of the inspection, the
signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial
number, or other identifier, for the equipment inspected. The record
shall be made available to an OSHA inspector upon request. The
maintenance inspection ensures that welding equipment is in safe
operating condition while the maintenance record provides evidence to
workers and Agency compliance officers that employers performed the
required inspections.

II. Special Issues for Comment

    OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
     Whether the proposed information collection requirements
are necessary for the proper performance of the Agency's functions,
including whether the information is useful;
     The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
     Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply;
for example, by using automated or other technological information
collection and transmission techniques.

III. Proposed Actions

    The Agency requests an adjustment decrease of 300 burden hours
(from 5,935 burden hours to 5,635 burden hours) associated with the
collection of information in the Welding, Cutting, and Brazing
Standard. The Agency will summarize the comments submitted in response
to this notice, and will include this summary in its request to OMB.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Standard for Welding, Cutting, and Brazing.
    OMB Control Number: 1218-0207.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profits.
    Number of Respondents: 20,094.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Total Responses: 80,657.
    Average Time per Response: OSHA estimates it will take 1 minute
(.02 hour) to maintain the inspection certification record to 5 minutes
(.08 hour) for each welder to perform the inspection periodically
(semiannually).
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 5,635.
    Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $0.

IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on This Notice and
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions

    You may submit comments in response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number for the ICR (Docket No. OSHA-2010-0037). You
may supplement electronic submissions by uploading document files
electronically. If you wish to mail additional materials in reference
to an electronic or facsimile submission, you must submit them to the
OSHA Docket Office (see the section of this notice titled ADDRESSES).
The additional materials must clearly identify your electronic comments
by your name, date, and the docket number so the Agency can attach them
to your comments.
    Because of security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the delivery of materials by hand,
express delivery, messenger, or courier service, please contact the
OSHA Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>, (TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>). Comments
and submissions are posted without change at http://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about
submitting personal information such as social security numbers and
dates of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index, some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to

read or download through this Web site. All submissions, including
copyrighted material, are available for inspection and copying at the
OSHA Docket Office. Information on using the http://www.regulations.gov
Web site to submit comments and access the docket is available at the
Web site's ``User Tips'' link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office for
information about materials not available through the Web site and for
assistance in using the Internet to locate docket submissions.

V. Authority and Signature

    David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this
notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012
(77 FR 3912, January 25, 2012).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on August 22, 2013.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2013-20954 Filed 8-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 143 (Monday, July 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44410-44411]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18325]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-616, OMB Control No. 3235-0671]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

    Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-2736

Extension:
    Rule 613

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in Rule 613 (17 CFR 242.613).
The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of information
to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') for extension and
approval.
    Rule 613 of Regulation NMS (17 CFR part 242) requires national
securities exchanges and national securities associations (``self-
regulatory organizations'' or ``SROs'') to jointly submit to the
Commission a national market system (``NMS'') plan to govern the
creation, implementation, and maintenance of a consolidated audit trail
and central repository for the collection of information for NMS
securities. The NMS plan must require each SRO and its respective
members to provide certain data to the central repository in compliance
with Rule 613. When it adopted Rule 613, the Commission discussed the
burden hours associated with the development and submission of the NMS
plan.\1\ In doing so, the Commission noted that the development and
submission of the NMS plan is part of a multi-step process for
developing the consolidated audit trail and that the Commission
deferred its discussion of the burden hours associated with the other
paperwork requirements required by Rule 613--such as the requirements
to provide certain data to the central repository--until after the SROs
submit an NMS plan and there has been an opportunity for public
comment.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67457 (July 18,
2012), 77 FR 45722 (August 1, 2012) (``Adopting Release''), at
45804-45807.
    \2\ Id. at 45804.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The SROs submitted to the Commission the NMS plan on September 30,
2014 \3\  and an amended and restated NMS Plan on February 27, 2015.\4\
Although the existing collection of information pertains to the
development and submission of an NMS plan, and such NMS plan has been
developed and submitted, the Commission believes it is prudent to
extend this collection of information during the pendency of the
Commission's review of the NMS plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Letter from the SROs, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
Commission, dated September 30, 2014 (``CAT NMS Plan'').
    \4\ See Letter from the SROs, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
Commission, dated February 27, 2015 (``Amended and Restated CAT NMS
Plan'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission estimates that each of the 19 SROs would spend a
total of 2,760 burden hours of internal legal, compliance, information
technology, and business operations time to comply with the existing
collection of information, calculated as follows: (880 programmer
analyst hours) + (880 business analyst hours) + (700 attorney hours) +
(300 compliance manager hours) = 2,760 burden hours to prepare and file
an NMS plan, or approximately 52,440 burden hours in the aggregate,
calculated as follows: (2,760 burden hours per SRO) x (19 SROs) =
52,440 burden hours. Amortized over three years, the annualized burden
hours would be 920 hours per SRO, or a total of 17,480 for all 19 SROs.
    The Commission further estimates that the aggregate one-time
reporting burden for preparing and filing an NMS plan would be
approximately $20,000 in external legal costs per SRO, calculated as
follows: 50 legal hours x $400 per hour = $20,000, for an aggregate
burden of $380,000, calculated as follows: ($20,000 in external legal
costs per SRO) x (19 SROs) = $380,000. Amortized over three years, the
annualized capital external cost would be $6,667 per SRO, or a total of
$126,667 for all 19 SROs.

    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: Pamela Dyson, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: July 22, 2015.
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-18325 Filed 7-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 173 (Thursday, September 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 55001]
[FR Doc No: 2022-19424]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2020-0639; FRL-10198-01-OMS]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Friction Materials Manufacturing
(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), NESHAP for Friction Materials
Manufacturing (EPA ICR Number 2025.10, OMB Control Number 2060-0481),
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. Public comments were
previously requested, via the Federal Register on February 8, 2021
during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30
days for public comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given
below, including its estimated burden and cost to the public. An agency
may neither conduct nor sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently-
valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted either on or before October
11, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OAR-2020-0639, online using https://www.regulations.gov/ (our preferred
method), or by email to [email protected], or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
    The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
    Submit written comments and recommendations to OMB for the proposed
information collection within 30 days of publication of this notice to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information
collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for
Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Muntasir Ali, Sector Policies and
Program Division (D243-05), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina, 27711; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC
West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC.
The telephone number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For
additional information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: Owners and operators of friction materials manufacturing
facilities are required to comply with reporting and record keeping
requirements for the General Provisions (40 CFR part 63, subpart A), as
well as for the applicable specific standards in 40 CFR part 63 subpart
QQQQQ. This includes submitting initial notifications, periodic reports
and results, and maintaining records of any period during which the
monitoring system is inoperative. These reports are used by the EPA to
determine compliance with these standards.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Friction materials manufacturing
facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart QQQQQ).
    Estimated number of respondents: 2 (total).
    Frequency of response: Semiannually.
    Total estimated burden: 534 hours (per year). Burden is defined at
5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $63,700 (per year), which includes $544 in
annualized capital/startup and/or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease in burden from the
most-recently approved ICR as currently identified in the OMB Inventory
of Approved Burdens. The regulations were revised in 2019 (84 FR 2742)
in the previous ICR (2025.09) to remove SSM plan and reporting
requirements and revise reporting requirements for deviations. However,
the reduction in burden in ICR 2025.09 is due to the removal of SSM
requirements that were not calculated correctly. The frequency of
recordkeeping for `Copies of notifications/reports' and `Time to
transmit or disclose information' should have been reduced from five
per year to three per year to reflect the removal of two submittals for
the SSM plan. That error has been corrected in this ICR (2025.10). The
growth rate for this industry is very low or non-existent. Since the
changes in the regulatory requirements did not require new monitoring
or equipment, and there is no significant industry growth, there are
also no changes in the capital/startup or operation and maintenance
(O&M) costs.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-19424 Filed 9-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: October 2, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 190)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 56013]
[DOCID:fr02oc07-4]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD05-07-095]

Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
(AIWW), at Scotts Hill, NC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District, has approved a
temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the
Figure Eight Swing Bridge, at AIWW mile 278.1, at Scotts Hill, NC.
Beginning November 1, 2007, until January 31, 2008, this deviation
allows the drawbridge to remain closed-to-navigation each day from 6:30
p.m. to 6 a.m., from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m., and from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., to
facilitate sandblasting and painting operations. In addition,
commercial vessel openings will be provided at night if at least three
hours notice is given by calling<PHONE_NUMBER> or via marine radio on
Channel 13.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 6:30 p.m. on November 1, 2007
to 6 a.m. on January 31, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this document are available for
inspection or copying at Commander (dpb), Fifth Coast Guard District,
Federal Building, 1st Floor, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, VA 23704-
5004 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Commander (dpb),
Fifth Coast Guard District maintains the public docket for this
temporary deviation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary S. Heyer, Bridge Management
Specialist, Fifth Coast Guard District, at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Figure Eight Swing Bridge has a vertical
clearance in the closed position to vessels of 20 feet, above mean high
water (MHW). Also, the vertical clearance in this location is limited
to 85 feet, above MHW, by the overhead power line.
    The Figure Eight Homeowners Association (the bridge owner) has
requested a temporary deviation from the current operating regulations
set out in 33 CFR 117.821(a)(3) to close the drawbridge to navigation
to facilitate sandblasting, cleaning and painting of the bridge
superstructure.
    To facilitate this operation, the Figure Eight Swing Bridge will be
maintained in the closed-to-navigation position each day beginning
November 1, 2007, until January 31, 2008, from 6:30 p.m. to 6 a.m.,
from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m., and from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. In addition,
commercial vessel openings will be provided at night if at least three
hours notice is given by calling<PHONE_NUMBER> or via marine radio on
Channel 13. At all other times, the drawbridge will operate in
accordance with 33 CFR 117.821(a)(3). In accordance with 33 CFR
117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to its regular operating schedule
immediately at the end of the designated time period. This deviation
from the operating regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
    We have analyzed this temporary deviation under Commandant
Instruction M16475.lD and Department of Homeland Security Management
Directive 5100.1, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f). The environmental impact that this temporary deviation will
have is minimal because of the drawbridge being closed to vessels to
perform routine repair and maintenance will not result in a change in
functional use, or an impact on a historically significant element or
setting.

    Dated: September 21, 2007.
Waverly W. Gregory, Jr.,
Chief, Bridge Administration Branch, Fifth Coast Guard District.
 [FR Doc. E7-19414 Filed 10-1-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


Supporting Statement

for

Declaration of Inspection Before Transfer

of Liquid Cargo in Bulk

OMB No.: 1625-0039

COLLECTION INSTRUMENTS:  Instruction

A.  Justification

1.  Circumstances that make the collection of information necessary.

Title 33 U.S.C. 1221 authorizes the Coast Guard to establish procedures,
methods, and equipment requirements to prevent the discharge of oil and
hazardous material from vessels and both onshore and offshore
facilities.  Title 33 U.S.C. 1225 and 46 U.S.C. 3703 authorized the
Coast Guard to establish procedures, methods, and equipment requirements
to prevent damage to vessels and facilities resulting from an
unauthorized discharge of oil or hazardous substances into the
environment.  The Declaration of Inspection (DOI) is required to ensure
safety during transfer of liquid cargo in 33 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) 156.150 and 46 CFR 35.35-30.  A Person-in-Charge (PIC) designated
under 33 CFR 154.710 and 155.700 completes the DOI for each bulk
transfer conducted.  A copy of the DOI must be kept on board the vessel
and facility for one month from the date of signature.

Coast Guard personnel, under the direct supervision of the Captain of
the Port (COTP), conduct regulatory compliance inspections of vessels
and facilities that transfer oil and hazardous materials in bulk.  The
DOI is checked to ensure compliance and to determine culpability in
spill and accident investigations.

This information collection supports the following strategic goals:

Department of Homeland Security

Prevention

Protection

Coast Guard

Maritime Safety

Protection of Natural Resources

Prevention Policy & Response Policy Directorates (CG-5P & CG-5R)

Safety:  Eliminate deaths, injuries, and property damage associated with
commercial maritime operations.

Human and Natural Environment: Eliminate environmental damage associated
with maritime transportation and operations on and around the nation’s
waterways.

2.  Purpose of the information collection.

As part of the Coast Guard’s Port Safety and Security Program, this
information is used in order to identify potential or actual violations
of the regulations.  The DOI must be completed for the U.S. to ensure
compliance with specific procedures to prevent pollution of U.S. waters
or damage to vessels and facilities.  If no records were kept, a PIC may
not know their responsibilities (in case of foreign nationals working on
foreign ships that transfer oil or hazardous materials in bulk in U.S.
ports) or they may not follow all of the proper procedures.  The result
would be a significant increase in the risk of pollution or damage.
Also, it would be more difficult to ascertain culpability for accidents
and spills.

3.  Consideration of the use of improved technology.

The DOI may be in written or electronic form.  We estimate that 0% of
DOI activities are done electronically.

4.  Efforts to identify duplication.

The Coast Guard monitors State and local regulatory activity in this
field.  No State, local, or other Federal agencies have been identified
that require equivalent information.  No similar information is
available.

5.  Methods to minimize the burden to small businesses if involved.

This information collection does not have an impact on small businesses
or other small entities.

6.  Consequences to the Federal program if collection were conducted
less frequently.

Presently, a DOI is completed each time a bulk transfer is conducted and
is kept for one month following each transfer operation.  Reducing the
use of DOIs could be detrimental in determining the causal factor for
accidents and spills.  Also, there is the possibility of increased
pollution if proper prevention procedures are not followed.

7.  Special collection circumstances.

This information collection is conducted in manner consistent with the
guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).

8.  Consultation.

A 60-day Notice will be published in the Federal Register to obtain
public comment on this collection.

9.  Provide payment or gift to respondents.

There is no offer of monetary or material value for this information
collection.

10.  Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents.

There are no assurances of confidentiality provided to the respondents
for this information collection.

11.  Additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature.

There are no questions of sensitive language.

12.  Estimates of annual hour and cost burdens to respondents.

The annual number of respondents is 14,058.

The annual number of responses is 259,903.

The estimated annual hour burden is 77,973.

The estimated annual cost burden is $5,307,840.

The burden to respondents is provided in Appendix A.  The wage rates
used are in accordance with the current edition of COMDTINST
7310.1(series) for “Out-Government” personnel.

Declaration of Inspection (DOI):  Each time a vessel conducts a transfer
of oil or other hazardous materials, a DOI must be completed and kept.
Completing a DOI constitutes a response.  This requirement covers all
U.S. vessels and all non-U.S. flagged ships that carry oil and hazardous
materials in bulk.  We estimate the annual frequency of responses varies
by vessel type.  We estimate that it will take vessel personnel about
0.3 hours (18 minutes) to verify that the required procedures have been
followed and to sign the DOI.  For U.S. Tank Ships and Non-U.S. Vessels,
we estimate that the DOI will be completed by a Mate.  For U.S. Tank
Barges and U.S. Nontank Vessels, we estimate that the DOI will be
completed by a tankerman.  The position of a Mate is analogous to a
Lieutenant (O-3) and the position of a tankerman is equivalent to an
Ensign (O-1).

13.   Estimates of capital and start-up costs.

There are no capital, start-up or maintenance costs associated with this
information collection.

14.  Estimates of annualized Federal Government costs.

The estimated annual Federal Government cost is $76,440 (see Appendix
B).  Coast Guard personnel review DOIs during cargo transfer
monitorings, periodic inspections, random boardings, and post-casualty
investigations.  The number of reviews is about 20% of all annual DOIs.
We estimate that it will take a CG petty officer (E-5) about 0.03 hours
(i.e., 1.5 minutes) per review.  The wage rate shown is in accordance
with the current edition of COMDTINST 7310.1(series) for
“In-Government” personnel.

15.  Explain the reasons for the change in burden.

The change in the burden is an ADJUSTMENT due to a change (i.e.,
increase) in the estimated annual number of responses.  There is no
proposed change to the recordkeeping requirements of this collection.
The recordkeeping requirements, and the methodology for calculating
burden, remain unchanged.

16.  Plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.

This information collection will not be published for statistical
purposes.

17.  Approval for not explaining the expiration date for OMB approval.

The Coast Guard will display the expiration date for OMB approval of
this information collection.

18.  Explain each exception to the certification statement.

The Coast Guard does not request an exception to the certification of
this information collection.

B.  Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods

This information collection does not employ statistical methods.

  The use of any electronic DOI system is at the discretion of an
owner/operator of the waterfront facility or vessel that engages in oil
or hazardous materials transfers.

  The time estimate (i.e., 18 minutes) to complete a DOI reflects both
the vessel and facility time.

OMB 2115-0506		  DATE \@ "MM/dd/yy"  09/14/15

1625-0039

 PAGE   4

  PAGE  1  of    NUMPAGES  3