[Federal Register: September 21, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 183)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 53920-53923]
[DOCID:fr21se07-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-29178; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-074-AD;
Amendment 39-15205; AD 2007-19-14]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Limited Model PC-6
Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would supersede existing ADs. This AD
results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by the aviation authority of another country to identify and
correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as:

    Findings of corrosion, wear and cracks in the upper wing strut
fittings on some PC-6 aircraft have been reported in the past.
    It is possible that the spherical bearing of the wing strut
fittings installed in the underwing can be loose in the fitting or
cannot rotate because of corrosion. In this condition, the joint
cannot function as designed and fatigue cracks may then develop.
Undetected cracks, wear and/or corrosion in this area could lead to
failure on the upper attachment fitting. This could result in the
failure of the wing structure with subsequent loss of control of the
aircraft.

    This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: This AD becomes effective September 26, 2007.
    On September 26, 2007, the Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed
in this AD.
    We must receive comments on this AD by October 22, 2007.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     DOT Docket Web Site: Go to  http://dms.dot.gov and follow

the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov
; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-
4059; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    On January 24, 2007, we issued AD 2007-03-08, Amendment 39-14919
(72 FR 4635; February 1, 2007), and on July 19, 2007, we issued AD
2007-15-09, Amendment 39-15138 (72 FR 41436; July 30, 2007). Those ADs
required actions intended to address an unsafe condition on the
products listed above.
    Since we issued AD 2007-03-08 and AD 2007-15-09, Pilatus reported
that the right hand (RH) wing strut fitting of aircraft serial number
903 was found with one lug shoulder completely broken. The aircraft had
accumulated 297 hours time-in-service since the RH wing strut fitting
had been replaced in May of 2007. Based on this report, the foreign
airworthiness authority has issued a new MCAI.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued AD
No. 2007-0241-E, dated September 5, 2007 (referred to after this as
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:

    Findings of corrosion, wear and cracks in the upper wing strut
fittings on some PC-6 aircraft have been reported in the past.
    It is possible that the spherical bearing of the wing strut
fittings installed in the underwing can be loose in the fitting or
cannot rotate because of corrosion. In this condition, the joint
cannot function as designed and fatigue cracks may then develop.
Undetected cracks, wear and/or corrosion in this area could lead to
failure on the upper attachment fitting. This could result in the
failure of the wing structure with subsequent loss of control of the
aircraft.
    To address this problem the superseded FOCA Airworthiness
Directives (AD) TM-L Nr. 80.627-6, HB-2006-400 and EASA AD 2007-0114
were issued to mandate specific inspections and to obtain a fleet
status. Since the issuance of AD 2007-0114, the data reporting
proved that it was necessary to establish repetitive inspections.
    Thus, in addition to an extended applicability, the present AD
mandates repetitive inspections of the upper wing strut fitting for
cracks, wear and/or corrosion and examination of the spherical
bearing and replacement of cracked fittings.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. has issued Service Bulletin No. 57-005, dated
August 30, 2007. The actions described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all information provided by the State of Design Authority and
determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might have also required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
described in a separate paragraph of the AD. These requirements take
precedence over those copied from the MCAI.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because it is
possible that fatigue cracks exist on the wing strut fittings installed
on the wing that are not detected during the inspections published in
the aircraft maintenance manual or required by any previous service
bulletin. Undetected cracks in this area could lead to failure of the
fitting and consequent loss of control. Therefore, we determined that
notice and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are
impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment
effective in fewer than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-29178; Directorate
Identifier 2007-CE-074-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://dms.dot.gov
, including any personal information you provide. We will

also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-14919 (72 FR
4635; February 1, 2007) and Amendment 39-15138 (72 FR 41436; July 30,
2007); and adding the following new AD:

2007-19-14 Pilatus Aircraft Limited: Amendment 39-15205; Docket No.
FAA-2007-29178; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-074-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective
September 26, 2007.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes the following ADs:
    (1) AD 2007-03-08; Amendment 39-14919; and
    (2) AD 2007-15-09; Amendment 39-15138.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to:
    (1) Models PC-6, PC-6-H1, PC-6-H2, PC-6/350, PC-6/350-H1, PC-6/
350-H2, PC-6/A, PC-6/A-H1, PC-6/A-H2, PC-6/B-H2, PC-6/B1-H2, PC-6/
B2-H2, PC-6/B2-H4, PC-6/C-H2, and PC-6/C1-H2 airplanes (these
airplanes are also identified as Fairchild Republic Company PC-6
airplanes, Fairchild Industries PC-6 airplanes, Fairchild Heli
Porter PC-6 airplanes, or Fairchild-Hiller Corporation PC-6
airplanes);
    (2) Manufacturer serial numbers (MSN) 101 through 999 and MSN
2001 through 2092;
    (3) Airplanes that are equipped with left wing strut fitting
part number (P/N) 6102.0041.00, P/N <IP_ADDRESS>, P/N
<IP_ADDRESS>, or P/N <IP_ADDRESS>; or equipped with right wing
strut fitting P/N 6102.0041.00, P/N <IP_ADDRESS>, P/N
<IP_ADDRESS>, or P/N <IP_ADDRESS>, or FAA-approved equivalent part
numbers; and
    (4) Airplanes that are certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 57: Wings.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    Findings of corrosion, wear and cracks in the upper wing strut
fittings on some PC-6 aircraft have been reported in the past.
    It is possible that the spherical bearing of the wing strut
fittings installed in the underwing can be loose in the fitting or
cannot rotate because of corrosion. In this condition, the joint
cannot function as designed and fatigue cracks may then develop.
Undetected cracks, wear and/or corrosion in this area could lead to
failure on the upper attachment fitting. This could result in the
failure of the wing structure with subsequent loss of control of the
aircraft.
    To address this problem the superseded FOCA Airworthiness
Directives (AD) TM-L Nr. 80.627-6, HB-2006-400 and EASA AD 2007-0114
were issued to mandate specific inspections and to obtain a fleet
status. Since the issuance of AD 2007-0114, the data reporting
proved that it was necessary to establish repetitive inspections.
    Thus, in addition to an extended applicability, the present AD
mandates repetitive inspections of the upper wing strut fitting for
cracks, wear and/or corrosion and examination of the spherical
bearing and replacement of cracked fittings.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) For airplanes that have not had both wing strut fittings
replaced within the last 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) since
September 26, 2007 (the effective date of this AD) or inspected
using an eddy current inspection method following Pilatus Aircraft
Ltd. Service Bulletin No. 57-004, dated April 16, 2007, within the
last 100 hours TIS since September 26, 2007 (the effective date of
this AD): Before further flight after September 26, 2007 (the
effective date of this AD), visually inspect the upper wing strut
fittings and examine the spherical bearings following Pilatus
Aircraft Ltd. Service Bulletin No. 57-005, dated August 30, 2007.
    (2) For all airplanes: Within 25 hours TIS after September 26,
2007 (the effective date of this AD) or within 30 days after
September 26, 2007 (the effective date of this AD), whichever occurs
first, visually and using eddy current methods, inspect the upper
wing strut fittings and examine the spherical bearings following
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Service Bulletin No. 57-005, dated August 30,
2007.
    (3) For all airplanes: After doing the inspection specified in
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD, repetitively at intervals not to exceed
100 hours TIS or 3 months, whichever occurs first, visually and
using eddy current methods, inspect the upper wing strut fittings
and examine the spherical bearings following Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.
Service Bulletin No. 57-005, dated August 30, 2007.
    (4) For all airplanes: If during any inspection required by
paragraph (f)(1), (f)(2), or (f)(3) of this AD cracks are found in
the upper wing strut fitting, before further flight, replace the
wing strut fitting following the Accomplishment Instructions in
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Service Bulletin No. 57-005, dated August 30,
2007. Replacement of one or both upper wing strut fitting(s) does
not terminate the repetitive inspection specified in paragraph
(f)(3) of this AD.
    (5) For all airplanes: If during any inspection required by
paragraph (f)(1), (f)(2), or (f)(3) of this AD the spherical bearing
is found not in conformity, before further flight, replace the
bearing following the Accomplishment Instructions in Pilatus
Aircraft Ltd. Service Bulletin No. 57-005, dated August 30, 2007.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No:
2007-0241-E, dated September 05, 2007; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Service
Bulletin No. 57-005, dated August 30, 2007; and Pilatus Aircraft
Ltd. Service Bulletin No. 57-004, dated April 16, 2007, for related
information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Service Bulletin No. 57-
005, dated August 30, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.,

Customer Liaison Manager, CH 6371 STANS, Switzerland; telephone: +
41 (0)41 619 6580; fax: + 41 (0)41 619 6576; e-mail:
fodermatt@pilatus aircaft.com.

    (3) You may review copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html
.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on September 13, 2007.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
 [FR Doc. E7-18476 Filed 9-20-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57153-57155]
[FR Doc No: 2022-20089]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1166; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-00407-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Airbus SAS Model A330-200, A330-200 Freighter, A330-300, A330-
800, A330-900, A340-200, and A340-300 series airplanes. This proposed
AD was prompted by a determination that certain landing gear parts have
been manufactured with improper material or using a deviating
manufacturing process. This proposed AD would require replacing each
affected part with a serviceable part, and for certain airplanes, re-
assessing any previously repaired main landing gear (MLG) sliding
piston, as specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
AD, which is proposed for incorporation by reference. This proposed AD
would also limit the installation of affected parts under certain
conditions. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 3,
2022.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For material that will be incorporated by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email [email protected]; internet
easa.europa.eu. You may find this material on the EASA website at
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available in the AD docket at
regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-1166.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-1166; or in person at Docket
Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, the mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments received, and
other information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed
above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, FAA, International Validation Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2022-1166; Project Identifier
MCAI-2022-00407-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, FAA,
International Validation Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA
98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected]. Any
commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated
as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2022-0049, dated March 21, 2022
(EASA AD 2022-0049) (also referred to as the MCAI), to correct an
unsafe condition for all

Airbus SAS Model A330-201, A330-202, A330-203, A330-223, A330-223F,
A330-243, A330-243F, A330-301, A330-302, A330-303, A330-321, A330-322,
A330-323, A330-341, A330-342, A330-343, A330-743L, A330-841, A330-941,
A340-211, A340-212, A340-213, A340-311, A340-312, and A340-313
airplanes. Model A330-743L airplanes are not certificated by the FAA
and are not included on the U.S. type certificate data sheet; this
proposed AD therefore does not include those airplanes in the
applicability.
    This proposed AD was prompted by a determination that certain
landing gear parts have been manufactured with improper material or
using a deviating manufacturing process. Further analysis determined
these parts cannot be operated until the applicable life limit, as
published in the applicable Airworthiness Limitations Section. The FAA
is proposing this AD to address possible nose landing gear (NLG) or MLG
structural fatigue failure and subsequent collapse, which could result
in damage to the airplane and injury to occupants. See the MCAI for
additional background information.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2022-0049 specifies procedures for replacing each affected
part with a serviceable part before exceeding the applicable revised
life limit, and, for airplanes with a previously repaired MLG sliding
piston, re-assessing the repaired part, which involves obtaining and
following instructions from the FAA, EASA, or Airbus SAS's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA).
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    These products have been approved by the aviation authority of
another country and are approved for operation in the United States.
Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design
Authority, it has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in
the MCAI referenced above. The FAA is issuing this NPRM after
determining that the unsafe condition described previously is likely to
exist or develop in other products of these same type designs.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2022-0049, described previously, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
This proposed AD would also limit the installation of affected parts
under certain conditions.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been
coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, the
FAA proposes to incorporate EASA AD 2022-0049 by reference in the FAA
final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with
EASA AD 2022-0049 in its entirety through that incorporation, except
for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of
this proposed AD. Using common terms that are the same as the heading
of a particular section in EASA AD 2022-0049 does not mean that
operators need comply only with that section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ``all required actions and compliance times,''
compliance with this AD requirement is not limited to the section
titled ``Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s)'' in EASA AD 2022-
0049. Service information required by EASA AD 2022-0049 for compliance
will be available at regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2022-1166 after the FAA final rule is published.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD would affect 128 airplanes
of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:

                                     Estimated Costs for Required Actions *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Labor cost                      Parts cost            Cost per product     Cost on U.S.  operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 49 work-hours x $85 per hour =   Up to $692,323 (per      Up to $696,489 (per      Up to $89,150,592.
 $4,165 (per MLG).                      MLG).                    MLG).
Up to 11 work-hours x $85 per hour =   Up to $260,410.........  Up to $261,346.........  Up to $33,452,288.
 $935 (NLG).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The FAA notes that not every MLG or NLG will need to be replaced on every airplane and that operators may have
  serviceable parts in stock, thereby reducing the costs on U.S. operators. Depending on the flight hours and
  landings on the landing gear, the FAA estimates that the replacement period for all affected MLG and NLG will
  be more than two years. Additionally, the FAA has received no definitive data on which to base the cost
  estimates for the re-assessment actions specified in this proposed AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:

    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA-2022-1166; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-
00407-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by November 3, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Airbus SAS airplanes identified in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (7) of this AD, certificated in any
category.
    (1) Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -243 airplanes.
    (2) Model A330-223F and -243F airplanes.
    (3) Model A330-301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342,
and -343 airplanes.
    (4) Model A330-841 airplanes.
    (5) Model A330-941 airplanes.
    (6) Model A340-211, -212, and -213 airplanes.
    (7) Model A340-311, -312, and -313 airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Landing
gear.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a determination that certain landing
gear parts have been manufactured with improper material or using a
deviating manufacturing processes. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address possible nose landing gear (NLG) or main landing gear (MLG)
structural fatigue failure and subsequent collapse, which could
result in damage to the airplane and injury to occupants.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2022-0049, dated March 21, 2022 (EASA AD 2022-0049).

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2022-0049

    (1) Where the affected part and serviceable part definitions in
EASA AD 2022-0049 refer to ``the SB,'' replace the text ``the SB''
with ``Airbus Service Bulletin A330-32-3302, dated January 18, 2022;
or Airbus Service Bulletin A340-4321, dated January 18, 2022; as
applicable.''
    (2) Where EASA AD 2022-0049 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (3) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2022-0049 does not apply
to this AD.

(i) Additional AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, send it
to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (j)(2) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus
SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by
paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, if any service information contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and
tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests
that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the
airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC
require approval of an AMOC.

(j) Related Information

    (1) For EASA AD 2022-0049, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; internet easa.europa.eu. You may find this EASA
AD on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
This material may be found in the AD docket at regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-1166.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, FAA,
International Validation Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

    Issued on September 13, 2022.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-20089 Filed 9-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8719-8720]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03225]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-74252; File No. SR-C2-2015-002]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
To Amend the Fees Schedule

February 11, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 2, 2015, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.c2exchange.com/Legal/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes making certain amendments to the PULSe
Workstation (``PULSe'') fees. By way of background, the Exchange
charges a fee of $400 per month per Permit Holder workstation for the
first 10 users and $100 per month for all subsequent users. Permit
Holders may also make the functionality available to their customers,
which may include non-broker dealer public customers and non-Permit
Holder broker dealers (referred to herein as ``non-Permit Holders'').
For such non-Permit Holder workstations, the Exchange charges a fee of
$400 per month per workstation.
    The Exchange first proposes to clarify and make explicit that the
PULSe fees are assessed on a ``per login ID'' basis. Currently, the
Fees Schedule states that the monthly fee for PULSe Permit Holder
workstations is ``$400/month (per Permit Holder workstation for the
first 10)'' and ``$100/month (per each additional Permit Holder
workstation)'' and for PULSe non-Permit Holder workstations ``$400/
month (per non-Permit Holder workstation).'' The Exchange believes the
current language, and the use of the term ``workstation'', may be
confusing to market participants. As such, the Exchange seeks to make
clear in the Fees Schedule that the PULSe fees are assessed per login
Id [sic]. The Exchange notes that this proposed change is merely a
clarification and that no substantive changes are being made to how
PULSe fees are assessed.
    Next, the Exchange proposes to provide that the $400 per month, per
login ID fee will be applicable to the first 15 login IDs (instead of
the first 10). The Exchange expended significant resources developing
PULSe, and seeks to recoup more of those costs.
    Finally, the Exchange seeks to remove outdate [sic] language from
the PULSe section of the Fees Schedule. Currently, the Fees Schedule
provides that the PULSe Workstation fee is waived for the first month
for the first new user of a Permit Holder and non-Permit Holder,
respectively. Additionally, the Fees Schedule provides that the fee is
waived for the first two months for all new users between August 1,
2014 and December 31, 2014, and that the fee is waived for the month of
August 2014 for all users that became new users in July 2014. As the
above referenced waiver periods have since passed, the Exchange no
longer believes this language is necessary to maintain in the Fees
Schedule. The Exchange notes that the fee will continue to be waived
for the first month of the first new user of a Permit Holder or non-
Permit Holder.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\3\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \4\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitation
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\5\ which requires that Exchange rules
provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its Trading Permit Holders and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange always strives for clarity in its rules
and Fees Schedule, so that market participants may best understand how
rules and fees apply. The Exchange believes that the proposed
clarifications and removal of outdated language in the Fees Schedule
will make the Fees Schedule easier to read and alleviate potential
confusion. The alleviation of potential confusion will remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, protect investors and the
public interest.
    The Exchange believes assessing the $400 per month, per login ID
fee to the first 15 login IDs (instead of the first 10) is reasonable
because the Exchange expended significant resources developing PULSe
and desires to recoup more of those costs. The Exchange believes this
proposed rule change is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because all Permit Holders who desire to use PULSe will be subject to
this change.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed changes to
alleviate confusion are not intended for competitive reasons and only
apply to C2. Additionally, the Exchange does not believe the proposed
change to assess the PULSe login Id [sic] fee to the first 15 login Ids
[sic] of a Permit Holder will impose any burden on intramarket
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because the proposed change applies to all Permit
Holders. The Exchange believes this proposal will not cause an
unnecessary burden on intermarket competition because the proposed
change was not motivated by intermarket competition. To the extent that
the proposed changes make C2 a more attractive marketplace for market
participants at other exchanges, such market participants are welcome
to become C2 market participants.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \6\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \7\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-C2-2015-002 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2015-002. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2015-002 and should be
submitted on or before March 11, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03225 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 915-916]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00075]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2019-N-5843]

Pharmacia and Upjohn Co., et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of 19
New Drug Applications

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is
withdrawing approval of 19 new drug applications (NDAs) from multiple
applicants. The applicants notified the Agency in writing that the drug
products were no longer marketed and requested that the approval of the
applications be withdrawn.

DATES: Approval is withdrawn as of February 7, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Lehrfeld, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6226, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-3137.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The applicants listed in the table have
informed FDA that these drug products are no longer marketed and have
requested that FDA withdraw approval of the applications under the
process in Sec.  314.150(c) (21 CFR 314.150(c)). The applicants have
also, by their requests, waived their opportunity for a hearing.
Withdrawal of approval of an application or abbreviated application
under Sec.  314.150(c) is without prejudice to refiling.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Application No.                Drug                Applicant
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NDA 004570..................  Heparin Sodium        Pharmacia and Upjohn
                               Injection, 1,000      Co. (a subsidiary
                               units/milliliter      of Pfizer Inc.),
                               (mL), 5,000 units/    235 East 42nd St.,
                               mL, and 10,000        New York, NY 10017-
                               units/mL.             7555.
NDA 009838..................  Reserpine Tablets,    Sandoz Inc., 2555 W.
                               0.1 milligram (mg)    Midway Blvd.,
                               and 0.25 mg.          Broomfield, CO
                                                     80020-1632.
NDA 017063..................  Ismotic (isosorbide   Alcon Research, LLC,
                               solution), 100        6201 South Freeway,
                               grams (g)/220 mL.     Fort Worth, TX
                                                     76134-2099.
NDA 017521..................  Dextrose Injection,   Baxter Healthcare
                               0.2 g/mL, 0.3 g/mL,   Corp., 1 Baxter
                               0.4 g/mL, 0.5 g/mL,   Parkway, Deerfield,
                               0.6 g/mL, and 0.7 g/  IL 60015.
                               mL.
NDA 017690..................  Imodium (loperamide   Johnson and Johnson
                               hydrochloride         Consumer Inc.,
                               (HCl)) Capsules, 2    McNeil Consumer
                               mg.                   Healthcare
                                                     Division, 7050 Camp
                                                     Hill Rd., Fort
                                                     Washington, PA
                                                     19034.
NDA 017694..................  Imodium (loperaminde   Do.
                               HCl) Capsules, 2 mg.

NDA 018361..................  Serophene             EMD Serono, Inc., 1
                               (clomiphene           Technology Pl.,
                               citrate) Tablets,     Rockland, MA 02370.
                               50 mg.
NDA 020262..................  Taxol (paclitaxel)    HQ Specialty Pharma
                               Injection, 6 mg/mL.   Corp., 120 Route 17
                                                     North, Paramus, NJ
                                                     07652.
NDA 020264..................  Megace (megestrol     Bristol-Myers Squibb
                               acetate) Oral         Co., P.O. Box 4000,
                               Suspension, 40 mg/    Mail Stop: D.2341,
                               mL.                   Princeton, NJ 08543-
                                                     4000.
NDA 020413..................  Zerit (stavudine)      Do.
                               for Oral Solution,
                               1 mg/mL.
NDA 020823..................  Exelon (rivastigmine  Novartis
                               tartrate) Capsules,   Pharmaceuticals
                               equivalent to (EQ)    Corp.
                               1.5 mg base, EQ 3
                               mg base, EQ 4.5 mg
                               base, and EQ 6 mg
                               base.
NDA 021025..................  Exelon (rivastigmine   Do.
                               tartrate) Solution,
                               EQ 2 mg base/mL.
NDA 021217..................  Exalgo                SpecGx LLC, 385
                               (hydromorphone HCl)   Marshall Ave.,
                               Extended-Release      Webster Groves, MO
                               Tablets, 8 mg, 12     63119.
                               mg, 16 mg, and 32
                               mg.
NDA 022046..................  Bupivacaine HCl and   Hospira, Inc., 275
                               epinephrine           North Field Dr.,
                               bitartrate            Bldg. H1, Lake
                               Injection, 0.5%/      Forest, IL 60045.
                               0.0091 mg/mL.
NDA 050632..................  Azactam (aztreonam)   Bristol-Myers Squibb
                               10 mg/mL, 20 mg/mL,   Co.
                               and 40 mg/mL.
NDA 202342..................  Esomeprazole          R2 Pharma, LLC,
                               Strontium Delayed-    11550 North
                               Release Capsules,     Meridian St., Suite
                               EQ 20 mg base and     290, Carmel, IN
                               EQ 40 mg base.        46032-5505.
NDA 207931..................  Technivie             AbbVie Inc., 1 North
                               (ombitasvir,          Waukegan Rd., Dept.
                               paritaprevir, and     PA77/Bldg. AP30,
                               ritonavir) Tablets,   North Chicago, IL
                               12.5 mg/75 mg/50 mg.  60064.
NDA 208603..................  Arymo ER (morphine    Zyla Life Sciences
                               sulfate) Extended-    US Inc., 600 Lee
                               Release Tablets, 15   Rd., Suite 100,
                               mg, 30 mg, and 60     Wayne, PA 19087.
                               mg.
NDA 208624..................  Viekira XR            AbbVie Inc.
                               (dasabuvir,
                               ombitasvir,
                               paritaprevir, and
                               ritonavir) Extended-
                               Release Tablets,
                               200 mg/8.33 mg/50
                               mg/33.33 mg.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, approval of the applications listed in the table, and
all amendments and supplements thereto, is hereby withdrawn as of
February 7, 2020. Approval of each entire application is withdrawn,
including any strengths and dosage forms inadvertently missing from the
table. Introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of products without approved new drug applications violates
section 301(a) and (d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21
U.S.C. 331(a) and (d)). Drug products that are listed in the table that
are in inventory on February 7, 2020 may continue to be dispensed until
the inventories have been depleted or the drug products have reached
their expiration dates or otherwise become violative, whichever occurs
first.

    Dated: January 2, 2020.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-00075 Filed 1-7-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14174-14175]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05863]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. 2016-26]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; Federal
Express Corporation

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of Title 14 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. The purpose of this notice is to improve the public's
awareness of, and participation in, the FAA's exemption process.
Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of
information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of
the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before April 5, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket FAA-2016-1946 using any
of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning
this action, contact Nia Daniels, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 8, 2016.
Lirio Liu,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2016-1946.
    Petitioner: Federal Express Corporation.
    Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 121.438; 121.652.

    Description of Relief Sought: Federal Express Corporation (FedEx)
petitions for an exemption from Sec.  121.438(b) to allow pilots who
are dual qualified in the Boeing 757 (B757) and Boeing 767 (B767)
aircraft to count the hours flown in both airplanes toward the 75 hours
of flight time required by Sec.  121.438(b). FedEx also petitions for
an exemption from Sec.  121.652(a) to combine pilot in command (PIC)
flight times logged on either the B757 or B767 to meet the 100 hours
PIC time required in order to avoid being subject to higher minimums in
either aircraft type once the combined flight time exceeds 100 hours.

[FR Doc. 2016-05863 Filed 3-15-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 248 (Monday, December 28, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 84331]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28564]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:
    Docket Numbers: RP21-317-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Removal of Expired Negotiated
Rate Agreements Filing to be effective 1/18/2021.
    Filed Date: 12/17/20.
    Accession Number: 20201217-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/29/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-318-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Amendments to Neg Rate Agmts
(Aethon 52454, 53154) to be effective 12/17/2020.
    Filed Date: 12/17/20.
    Accession Number: 20201217-5059.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/29/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-319-000.
    Applicants: Sabine Pipe Line LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Normal 7.25 and 7.26 to be
effective 2/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 12/17/20.
    Accession Number: 20201217-5075.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/29/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-320-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Non-Conforming--Southeastern
Trail to be effective 1/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 12/17/20.
    Accession Number: 20201217-5171.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/29/20

    Docket Numbers: RP21-321-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: List of Non-Conforming Service
Agreements (Southeastern Trail) to be effective 1/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 12/17/20.
    Accession Number: 20201217-5196.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/29/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-322-000.
    Applicants: Stagecoach Pipeline & Storage Company LL.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Stagecoach Pipeline & Storage
Company LLC--Filing of Non-Conforming Agreement to be effective 1/1/
2021.
    Filed Date: 12/17/20.
    Accession Number: 20201217-5225.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/29/20.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 18, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-28564 Filed 12-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 149 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45925-45927]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18516]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30854; Amdt. No. 3489]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective August 2, 2012. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of August 2, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability_All SIAPs are available online free of charge. Visit
nfdc.faa.gov to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP copies may be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Dunham III, Flight
Procedure Standards Branch (AFS-420), Flight Technologies and Programs
Division, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration,
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125),
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by amending the referenced SIAPs.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP is listed on the
appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National Flight Data
Center (FDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is incorporated
by reference in the amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and
Sec.  97.20 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use the regulatory
text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction on charts
printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP contained in FAA form documents is
unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR sections and
specifies the types of SIAP and the corresponding effective dates. This
amendment also identifies the airport and its location, the procedure
and the amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP as amended in the transmittal. For safety and
timeliness of change considerations, this amendment incorporates only
specific changes contained for each SIAP as modified by FDC/P-NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs, as modified by FDC P-NOTAM, and contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these changes to
SIAPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific conditions
existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in this rule
have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an emergency
action of immediate flight safety relating directly to published
aeronautical charts. The circumstances which created the need for all
these SIAP amendments requires making them effective in less than 30
days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs
and

safety in air commerce, I find that notice and public procedure before
adopting these SIAPs are impracticable and contrary to the public
interest and, where applicable, that good cause exists for making these
SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air traffic control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 20, 2012.
John Duncan,
Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97, 14 CFR part 97, is amended by
amending Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, effective at 0901 UTC
on the dates specified, as follows:

Part 97--Standard Instrument Approach Procedures

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

Sec. Sec.  97.23, 97.25, 97.27, 97.29, 97.31, 97.33, 97.35   [Amended]

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:
    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SIAPs; Sec.  97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SIAPs, Identified as follows:

Effective Upon Publication

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      AIRAC Date           State              City                 Airport          FDC No.      FDC Date                      Subject
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23-Aug-12............  KS             Wichita.............  Wichita Mid-               2/0134      7/11/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY 1R, Amdt 1.
                                                             Continent.
23-Aug-12............  NE             North Platte........  North Platte Rgnl          2/0484      7/11/12  ILS OR LOC RWY 30, Amdt 6.
                                                             Airport Lee Bird
                                                             Field.
23-Aug-12............  NE             North Platte........  North Platte Rgnl          2/0485      7/11/12  VOR RWY 35, Amdt 18A.
                                                             Airport Lee Bird
                                                             Field.
23-Aug-12............  TX             Dallas..............  Dallas Love Field...       2/0613      7/11/12  ILS RWY 13R, Amdt 4D.
23-Aug-12............  TX             Dallas..............  Dallas Love Field...       2/0617      7/11/12  ILS RWY 13L, Amdt 31B.
23-Aug-12............  CA             Santa Ana...........  John Wayne Airport-        2/1446      7/11/12  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 19R, Amdt 1B.
                                                             Orange County.
23-Aug-12............  KS             Hutchinson..........  Hutchinson Muni.....       2/3180      7/11/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Amdt 1.
23-Aug-12............  MA             Orange..............  Orange Muni.........       2/3482      7/11/12  VOR A, Amdt 7.
23-Aug-12............  MA             Worcester...........  Worcester Rgnl......       2/3525      7/11/12  ILS OR LOC RWY 29, Amdt 4.
23-Aug-12............  IA             Des Moines..........  Des Moines Intl.....       2/3637      7/11/12  ILS OR LOC RWY 13, Amdt 9A.
23-Aug-12............  OK             Tulsa...............  Tulsa Intl..........       2/3664      7/11/12  RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 26, Orig-A.
23-Aug-12............  OK             Tulsa...............  Tulsa Intl..........       2/3666      7/11/12  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 26, Amdt 3.
23-Aug-12............  NC             Jacksonville........  Albert J Ellis......       2/4274      7/11/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Amdt 1.
23-Aug-12............  MN             Luverne.............  Quentin Aanenson           2/5558      7/11/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig.
                                                             Field.
23-Aug-12............  OK             Tulsa...............  Tulsa Intl..........       2/6222      7/11/12  VOR OR TACAN RWY 26, Amdt 24.
23-Aug-12............  AL             Huntsville..........  Huntsville Intl-Carl       2/6348      7/11/12  ILS OR LOC RWY 18R, Amdt 24C.
                                                             T Jones Field.
23-Aug-12............  TX             George West.........  Live Oak County.....       2/7921      7/11/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Orig.
23-Aug-12............  TX             George West.........  Live Oak County.....       2/7922      7/11/12  VOR/DME A, Amdt 2.
23-Aug-12............  MN             Owatonna............  Owatonna Degner Rgnl       2/7931      7/11/12  ILS OR LOC RWY 30, Amdt 2A.
23-Aug-12............  WI             Boyceville..........  Boyceville Muni.....       2/7936      7/11/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Amdt 1.
23-Aug-12............  WI             Boyceville..........  Boyceville Muni.....       2/7937      7/11/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Amdt 1.
23-Aug-12............  MO             Mountain Grove......  Mountain Grove             2/7942      7/11/12  VOR/DME OR GPS Rwy 8, Orig-A.
                                                             Memorial.
23-Aug-12............  MI             Fremont.............  Fremont Muni........       2/8257      7/11/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Amdt 1B.
23-Aug-12............  NY             Williamson/Sodus....  Williamson-Sodus....       2/8598      7/11/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Amdt 1.
23-Aug-12............  NY             Williamson/Sodus....  Williamson-Sodus....       2/8599      7/11/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Amdt 2.
23-Aug-12............  FL             Miami...............  Miami Intl..........       2/8600      7/11/12  ILS OR LOC RWY 26L, Amdt 15B.
23-Aug-12............  LA             New Orleans.........  Louis Armstrong New        2/8632      7/11/12  ILS OR LOC RWY 1, Amdt 17.
                                                             Orleans Intl.
23-Aug-12............  CA             Santa Ana...........  John Wayne Airport-        2/8703      7/11/12  ILS OR LOC RWY 19R, Amdt 12A.
                                                             Orange County.
23-Aug-12............  TX             Austin..............  Lakeway Airpark.....       2/8777      7/11/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY 16, Orig.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2012-18516 Filed 8-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 183 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58399-58400]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23186]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0001]

Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and
recommendations to the Agency on FDA's regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on November 8, 2012, from 8
a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: FDA White Oak Campus, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Building
31 Conference Center, the Great Room (rm. 1503), Silver Spring, MD
20993-0002. Information regarding special accommodations due to a
disability,

visitor parking, and transportation may be accessed at: http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm; under the heading
``Resources for You,'' click on ``Public Meetings at the FDA White Oak
Campus.'' Please note that visitors to the White Oak Campus must enter
through Building 1.
    Contact Person: Caleb Briggs, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
31, Rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, FAX: 301-847-
8533, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or FDA Advisory Committee Information
Line, 1-800-741-8138<PHONE_NUMBER> in the Washington, DC area). A
notice in the Federal Register about last minute modifications that
impact a previously announced advisory committee meeting cannot always
be published quickly enough to provide timely notice. Therefore, you
should always check the Agency's Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm and scroll down to the appropriate
advisory committee meeting link, or call the advisory committee
information line to learn about possible modifications before coming to
the meeting.
    Agenda: During the morning session, the committee will discuss new
drug application (NDA) 204026, with the established name pomalidomide,
application submitted by Celgene Corporation. The proposed indication
(use) for this product is in combination with dexamethasone for
patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have
received at least 2 prior regimens of established benefit, including
both lenalidomide and bortezomib and have demonstrated disease
progression on the last therapy.
    During the afternoon session, the committee will discuss
supplemental new drug application (sNDA) 021882/015, with the trade
name EXJADE (deferasirox) tablets for oral suspension, application
submitted by Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation. The proposed
indication (use) for this product is for the treatment of chronic iron
overload in patients with non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia
syndromes (beta-thalassemia intermedia, HbE beta-thalassemia, and
alpha-thalassemia) aged 10 years and older.
    FDA intends to make background material available to the public no
later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post
the background material on its Web site prior to the meeting, the
background material will be made publicly available at the location of
the advisory committee meeting, and the background material will be
posted on FDA's Web site after the meeting. Background material is
available at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/Calendar/default.htm. Scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee meeting
link.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee.
Written submissions may be made to the contact person on or before
October 25, 2012. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled
between approximately 10:30 a.m. to 11 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.
Those individuals interested in making formal oral presentations should
notify the contact person and submit a brief statement of the general
nature of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and
addresses of proposed participants, and an indication of the
approximate time requested to make their presentation on or before
October 17, 2012. Time allotted for each presentation may be limited.
If the number of registrants requesting to speak is greater than can be
reasonably accommodated during the scheduled open public hearing
session, FDA may conduct a lottery to determine the speakers for the
scheduled open public hearing session. The contact person will notify
interested persons regarding their request to speak by October 18,
2012.
    Persons attending FDA's advisory committee meetings are advised
that the Agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical
outlets.
    FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with
physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special
accommodations due to a disability, please contact Caleb Briggs at
least 7 days in advance of the meeting.
    FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm111462.htm for procedures
on public conduct during advisory committee meetings.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: September 13, 2012.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2012-23186 Filed 9-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register: July 28, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 145)]
[Notices]
[Page 43733-43734]
[DOCID:fr28jy08-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13211-000]

Kenai Hydro, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comment, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications

July 21, 2008.
    On April 28, 2008, Kenai Hydro, LLC filed an application, pursuant
to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act (FPA), proposing to study the
feasibility of the Falls Creek Project to be located on Falls Creek in
Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska. The project would occupy federal lands
managed by the U.S. Forest Service.
    The proposed project would most likely consist of: (1) A concrete
diversion dam/intake structure located in Falls Creek; (2) a 2.5-3 mile
steel lined penstock; (3) a powerhouse containing one turbine generator
unit with a total installed capacity of about 5 MW; (4) a 2-4 mile,
115kV transmission line and; (5) appurtenant facilities. The annual
production would

be 17.5 GWh which would be sold to a local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Steve Gilbert, 6921 Howard Avenue, Anchorage, AK
99504,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Steven Sachs,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
    Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    For more information on how to submit these types of filings please
go to the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-
comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the Commission's Web site at http:/
/www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13211) in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-17153 Filed 7-25-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23523-23524]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10805]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket Number NHTSA-2017-0095]

Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces that the Information Collection Request (ICR)
abstracted below has been forwarded to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature of
the information collections and its expected burden. The Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments on the
following collection of information was published on February 20, 2018
(83 FR 7297).

DATES: Send comments on or before June 20, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket No. NHTSA-2017-
0095 by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for sending comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. Telephone: 1-800-647-5527.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this proposed collection of information. All
comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit https://DocketInfo.dot.gov.
    The 60-day notice for this ICR was inadvertently filed in docket
NHTSA-2017-0039. The correct docket number is NHTSA-2017-0095.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex Ansley, Recall Management
Division (NEF-107), NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Ave., Room W48-301,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please identify the
relevant collection of information by referring to its OMB Control
Number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for approval, it must first publish a
document in the Federal Register providing a 60-day

comment period and otherwise consult with members of the public and
affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of information.
The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must be included in
such a document. Under OMB's regulation, See 5 CFR 1320.8(d), an agency
must ask for public comment on the following:
    (i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
    (ii) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
    (iii) how to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
    (iv) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
    In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following collection of information:
    Title of Collection: Petitions for Hearings on Notification and
Remedy of Defects.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved information
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2127-0039.
    Affected Public: Businesses or others for profit.
    Abstract: Sections 30118(e) and 30120(e) of Title 49 of the United
States Code specify that any interested person may petition NHTSA to
hold a hearing to determine whether a manufacturer of motor vehicles or
motor vehicle equipment has met its obligation to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of vehicles or equipment of a safety-related
defect or noncompliance with a Federal motor vehicle safety standard in
the manufacturer's products and to remedy that defect or noncompliance.
    To implement these statutory provisions, NHTSA promulgated 49 CFR
part 557, Petitions for Hearings on Notification and Remedy of Defects.
Part 557 establishes procedures providing for the submission and
disposition of petitions for hearings on the issues of whether the
manufacturer has met its obligation to notify owners, purchasers, and
dealers of safety-related defects or noncompliance, or to remedy such
defect or noncompliance free of charge.
    Estimated annual burden: During NHTSA's last renewal of this
information collection, the agency estimated it would receive one
petition a year, with an estimated one hour of preparation for each
petition, for a total of one burden hour per year. That estimate
remains unchanged with this notice.
    Number of respondents: 1.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
    All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for OMB approval.

    Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c); delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50 and 501.8(f).

Stephen A. Ridella,
Director, Office of Defects Investigation.
[FR Doc. 2018-10805 Filed 5-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P