[Federal Register: December 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 230)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 74608-74610]
[DOCID:fr01de10-2]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0735 Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-030-AD;
Amendment 39-16529; AD 2010-24-10]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; CENTRAIR Models 101, 101A, 101P, and
101AP Gliders

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    Damages to the rudder bar locking adjustment tube of a non-
reinforced version have been reported to Soci[eacute]t[eacute]
Nouvelle (SN) Centrair. This tube had been reinforced in 1984 with a
modification. Gliders produced before the introduction of this
modification have not been systematically retrofitted.
    In case of rudder bar locking adjustment tube breaking in flight
when adjusting the rudder pedals position, it might interfere with
the rudder pedals which could lead to rudder jam or a restricted
rudder movement and consequently, to reduced control of the
sailplane.

We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective January 5, 2011.
    On January 5, 2011, the Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this
AD.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov or in person at Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact
Soci[eacute]t[eacute] Nouvelle CENTRAIR, Aerodome--36300 Le Blanc,
France; telephone: +33 (0)254 370796; fax: +33 (0)54. 374864; Internet:
http://www.societe.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Davison, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on July 23, 2010 (75 FR
43103). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI, issued on May 26, 2010, states:

    Damages to the rudder bar locking adjustment tube of a non-
reinforced version have been reported to Soci[eacute]t[eacute]
Nouvelle (SN) Centrair. This tube had been reinforced in 1984 with a
modification. Gliders produced before the introduction of this
modification have not been systematically retrofitted.
    In case of rudder bar locking adjustment tube breaking in flight
when adjusting the rudder pedals position, it might interfere with
the rudder pedals which could lead to rudder jam or a restricted
rudder movement and consequently, to reduced control of the
sailplane.
    For the reason described above, this AD requires inspecting the
rudder bar locking adjustment tube and, if necessary, replacing it.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information

provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 52 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators to be $4,420 or $85 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions will
take about 1 work-hour and require parts costing $51, for a cost of
$136 per product. We have no way of determining the number of products
that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2010-24-10 CENTRAIR: Amendment 39-16529; Docket No. FAA-2010-0735;
Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-030-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective January
5, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to CENTRAIR Models 101, 101A, 101P, and
101AP gliders, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 27: Flight
Controls.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    Damages to the rudder bar locking adjustment tube of a non-
reinforced version have been reported to Soci[eacute]t[eacute]
Nouvelle (SN) Centrair. This tube had been reinforced in 1984 with a
modification. Gliders produced before the introduction of this
modification have not been systematically retrofitted.
    In case of rudder bar locking adjustment tube breaking in flight
when adjusting the rudder pedals position, it might interfere with
the rudder pedals which could lead to rudder jam or a restricted
rudder movement and consequently, to reduced control of the
sailplane.
    For the reason described above, this AD requires inspecting the
rudder bar locking adjustment tube and, if necessary, replacing it.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions in accordance
with Soci[eacute]t[eacute] Nouvelle Centrair Service Bulletin No.
101-29, dated July 30, 2009:
    (1) Within the next 30 days after January 5, 2011 (the effective
date of this AD), inspect the rudder bar locking adjustment tube to
determine if it has been reinforced and to determine if it has been
damaged.
    (2) If the results of the inspection required in paragraph
(f)(1) of this AD show that the rudder bar locking adjustment tube
has not been reinforced and is not damaged, replace it with a
reinforced rudder bar locking adjustment tube, part number (P/N)
$Y186A, at the next scheduled maintenance event after January 5,
2011 (the effective date of this AD) but no later than 12 months
after January 5, 2011 (the effective date of this AD).
    (3) If the results of the inspection required in paragraph
(f)(1) of this AD show that the rudder bar locking adjustment tube
has not been reinforced but is damaged, replace it with a reinforced
rudder bar locking adjustment tube, P/N $Y186A, before further
flight.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Greg Davison, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using
any approved AMOC on any glider to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.
2010-0099, dated May 26, 2010; and Soci[eacute]t[eacute] Nouvelle
Centrair Service Bulletin No. 101-29, dated July 30, 2009, for
related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use Soci[eacute]t[eacute] Nouvelle Centrair Service
Bulletin No. 101-29, dated July 30, 2009, to do the actions required
by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Soci[eacute]t[eacute] Nouvelle CENTRAIR, Aerodome--36300 Le Blanc,
France; telephone: +33 (0)254 370796; fax: +33 (0)54. 374864;
Internet: http://www.societe.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the FAA, Central Region,
Office of the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the
Central Region, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on November 17, 2010.
Patrick R. Mullen,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-29461 Filed 11-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8856-8857]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03062]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Filing

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balfour, Scott C.....................................        ID-7646-004
Bennett, Robert R....................................        ID-7647-002
Blunden, Gregory W...................................        ID-7981-001
Muldoon, Daniel P....................................        ID-8749-001
Schwartz, David E....................................        ID-3396-002
Strickland, Valerie C................................        ID-8254-001
Weatherford, William W...............................        ID-8850-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that on February 10, 2020, Scott C. Balfour, Robert R.
Bennett, Gregory W. Blunden, Daniel P. Muldoon, David E. Schwartz,
Valerie C. Strickland, and William W. Weatherford, submitted for
filing, applications for authority to hold interlocking positions,
pursuant to section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 825d(b)
(2019) and section 45.8 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's
(Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR part 45.8 (2019).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
eLibrary link and is available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public

Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the
website that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any
FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on March 2, 2020.

    Dated: February 10, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-03062 Filed 2-14-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: April 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 69)]
[Notices]
[Page 18518-18519]
[DOCID:fr12ap10-78]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1895-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

Massachusetts; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (FEMA-1895-DR), dated
March 29, 2010, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: March 29, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated March 29, 2010, the President issued a major disaster declaration
under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts resulting from severe storms and
flooding beginning on March 12, 2010, and continuing, is of
sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a major disaster
declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''). Therefore, I declare that such a major disaster exists in
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Individual Assistance in the
designated areas and Hazard Mitigation throughout the Commonwealth.
Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance is
supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Hazard Mitigation and Other Needs Assistance will be limited to 75
percent of the total eligible costs.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The time period prescribed for the implementation of section
310(a), Priority to Certain Applications for Public Facility and Public
Housing Assistance, 42 U.S.C. 5153, shall be for a period not to exceed
six months after the date of this declaration.
    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, James N. Russo, of FEMA is appointed
to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major disaster.
    The following areas of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts have been
designated as adversely affected by this major disaster:

    Bristol, Essex, Middlesex, Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk, and
Worcester Counties for Individual Assistance.
    All counties within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts are
eligible to apply for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant
Program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-8281 Filed 4-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION DATA STANDARD Standard No.: 1 19938 Version 2  FINAL DRAFT July 26, 2005 This data standard is produced by the Environmental Data Standards Council ( EDSC)

The Environmental Data Standards Council ( EDSC) is a partnership among EPA, States and Tribal partners to promote the efficient sharing of environmental information through the development and adoption of data standards. More information about the EDSC is available at www. envdatastandards. net. Chemical Identification Data Standard Std No.: 1 19938 Version 2 Final Draft July 26, 2005 Page 2 Foreword The Environmental Data Standards Council ( EDSC) identifies, prioritizes, and pursues the creation of data standards for those areas where information exchange standards will provide the most value in achieving environmental results. The Council involves Tribes and Tribal Nations, state and federal agencies in the development of the standards and then provides the draft materials for general review. Business groups, non governmental organizations, and other interested parties may then provide input and comment for Council consideration and standard finalization. Draft and final standards are available at http:// www. envdatastandards. net.

1.0 INTRODUCTION The Chemical Identification Data Standard defines the required information for identification of chemical substances of interest to EPA. This update to the data standard provides five mandatory and fifteen optional data elements for chemical substance identification. The mandatory data group includes EPA Chemical tracking Number, Chemical Abstracts Registry Number, Chemical Substance Systematic Name, EPA Chemical Registry Name and EPA Chemical Identifier. The optional data elements provide additional identification information about a chemical substance or chemical grouping.

1.1 Scope This data standard includes the data groupings needed to consistently and unambiguously identify chemical substances regulated by EPA.

1.2 References to Other Data Standards This standard relies on other standards to make it complete and provide the necessary support. As such users should consider the references to other data standards noted below as integral to the Chemical Identification Data Standard. These include:

  ESAR: Analysis and Results [ Final Draft Version 1.0] Data Standard 1.3 Terms and Definitions Term Definition Chemical Substance An organic or inorganic material that can be categorized and defined for the purposes of this standard as one of the following: a single fullydefined chemical substance; a chemical species; a chemical substance of known composition; a chemical substance of variable composition; a chemical substance of unknown composition; or a generic confidential business information ( CBI) chemical substance.

Substance Registry System The Substance Registry System ( SRS) is the official United States Environmental Protection Agency ( US EPA) repository and reference database of names and other identifiers for substances and substance groupings of interest to the Agency. The SRS provides tools for search and retrieval of substance identification data, directly through its own Web interface as well as through active linkages from other data systems. The SRS is intended to facilitate substance data integration among US EPA and its external stakeholders and partners. ( http:// www. epa. gov/ srs/). Chemical Identification Data Standard Std No.: 1 19938 Version 2 Final Draft July 26, 2005 Page 3 1.4 Implementation Users are encouraged to use the XML registry housed on the Exchange Network Web site to download schema components for the construction of XML schema flows ( http:// www. exchangenetwork. net).

1.5 Document Format The structure of this document is briefly described below:

a. Section 2.0 Chemical Identification Diagram, illustrates the principal data groupings contained within this standard.

b. Section 3.0 Chemical Identification Data Standards Table provides information on the high level, intermediate and elemental Chemical Identification data groupings. Where applicable, for each level of this data standard a definition, XML tag, note( s), example list of values and format are provided. The format column may include the number of characters for the associated data element, where " A" specifies alphanumeric and " N" designates numeric.

c. Data Standard Numbering: For purposes of clarity and to enhance understanding of data grouping hierarchy and relationships, each data group is numerically classified from the primary to the elemental level. d. Code and Identifier metadata: Based on the business need, additional metadata may be required to sufficiently describe an identifier or a code. A note regarding this additional metadata is included in the notes column for identifier and code elements. Additional metadata for identifiers may include:

  Code List Identifier, which is a standardized reference to the context or source of the set of codes Additional metadata for codes may include:

  Code List Identifier, which is a standardized reference to the context or source of the set of codes   Code List Version Identifier, which identifies the particular version of the set of codes.

  Code List Version Agency Identifier, which identifies the agency responsible for maintaining the set of codes   Code List Name, which describes the corresponding name for which the code represents e. Appendix A, lists the references for Chemical Identification data standard.

f. Appendix B, Chemical Identification Data Structure Diagram illustrates the hierarchical classification of the Chemical Identification data standard. This diagram enables business and technical users of this standard to quickly understand its general content and complexity. Chemical Identification Data Standard Std No.: 1 19938 Version 2 Final Draft July 26, 2005 Page 4 2.0 CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION DIAGRAM The figure below illustrates the major data groups associated with the Chemical Identification Data Standard.

1.0 Mandatory Chemical Identification 2.0 Optional Chemical Identification Chemical Identification Data Standard Chemical Identification Data Standard Std No.: 1 19938 Version 2 Final Draft July 26, 2005 Page 5 3.0 CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION DATA STANDARDS TABLE 1.0 Mandatory Chemical Identification Definition: Mandatory information required for identification and designation about the chemical substance.

Relationship: None.

Notes: None.

XML Tag: MandatoryChemicalIdentification Name Definition Notes Format XML Tag 1.1 EPA Chemical Internal Tracking Number The unique record number assigned to a chemical substance or a chemical grouping for tracking within EPA systems. This data element is mandatory. It is an electronic key that facilitates data exchange with the Substance Registry System ( SRS) and other EPA databases. This identification number must be obtained from the SRS. A EPAChemicalIn ternalTrackingN umber 1.2 Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number The unique number assigned by Chemical Abstracts Service ( CAS) to a chemical substance. This is mandatory where that number exists or can be assigned.

Example List of Values:

  67 66 3 for Chloroform   7439 92 1 for Lead   108 88 3 for Toluene A CASRegistryNu mber Chemical Identification Data Standard Std No.: 1 19938 Version 2 Final Draft July 26, 2005 Page 6 Name Definition Notes Format XML Tag 1.3 EPA Chemical Identifier The identifier to be created and placed in the SRS for each chemical substance or chemical group in the SRS for which a CAS Registry Number does not exist and cannot be assigned. This identifier is mandatory when CAS Registry Number does not exist.

Example List of Values:

  E761429 for Copper Compounds   E17075060 for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, High Molecular Weight Note: Based on the business need,

additional metadata may be required to sufficiently describe an identifier.

This additional metadata is described in the Introduction section 1.5. d. A EPAChemicalId entifier 1.4 Chemical Substance Systematic Name A standard name assigned to a chemical substance. The name is descriptive of the molecular composition of the substance if the composition is known. If a CAS number exists for a chemical substance, the index name is formulated according to the nomenclature rules set forth for the 9 th Collective Indexing Period. This is mandatory where that name exists or can be assigned.

Example List of Values:

  Methane, trichloro

  Lead, tetraethyl

  Acetic acid, chloro A ChemicalSubst anceSystematic Name Chemical Identification Data Standard Std No.: 1 19938 Version 2 Final Draft July 26, 2005 Page 7 Name Definition Notes Format XML Tag 1.5 EPA Chemical Registry Name The name EPA has selected as the preferred name for a chemical substance. The chemical registry name cannot be assigned to all chemical substances of interest to the Agency. The name,

however, is mandatory for all chemical groupings and for chemical substances where CAS systematic names do not exist and cannot be assigned.

Example List of Values:

  Chloroform   Iodine   Anthracene A EPAChemicalRe gistryName 2.0 Optional Chemical Identification Relationship: None.

Notes: None.

XML Tag: OptionalChemicalIdentification Name Definition Notes Format XML Tag 2.1 EPA Chemical Registry Name Source Text The source of the EPA chemical registry name. Example List of Values:

  RCRA   CERCLIS   AQS   TRI   CWA311 A EPAChemicalRe gistryNameSour ceText Chemical Identification Data Standard Std No.: 1 19938 Version 2 Final Draft July 26, 2005 Page 8 Name Definition Notes Format XML Tag 2.2 EPA Chemical Registry Name The type of source for the EPA Chemical Registry Name. Example List of Values:

  EPA Regulation Name   EPA Data System Name A EPAChemicalRe gistryName 2.3 Molecular Formula Text The formula that specifies the number of atoms of each element in a molecule of a chemical substance. SRS will provide a complete formula for all single, fully defined chemical substances, or a partial formula for mixtures where one or more components can be defined.

Example List of Values:

  Molecular formula for Chloroform is CHCl3   SRS matches for C2H4Cl2 are Ethane, 1,1 dichloro and Ethane, 1,2 dichloro and Dichloroethane ( mixture) A MolecularFormul aText 2.4 Chemical Substance Formula Weight Quantity The sum of the atomic weights of constituent atoms in a chemical substance. SRS will provide the formula weight where a complete molecular formula for a chemical substance exists.

Example List of Values:

  Formula weight for Chloroform is 119.38   Formula weight for Heptachlor is 373.32 A ChemicalSubsta nceFormulaWei ghtQuantity Chemical Identification Data Standard Std No.: 1 19938 Version 2 Final Draft July 26, 2005 Page 9 Name Definition Notes Format XML Tag 2.5 Chemical Substance Type Name A descriptive name for types of chemical substances. SRS will store this name for regulatory chemical classes.

Example List of Values:

  Organic Substances   Radionuclide A ChemicalSubsta nceTypeName 2.6 Chemical Substance Definition Text The text that provides clarification to the identity of a chemical substance. SRS will store this text when needed to completely, uniquely define a chemical substance.

Example List of Values:

  Definition for Humic Acid:

The brown polymeric product from the decomposition of organic matter,

particularly dead plants. This combination polymeric product may contain aromatic and heterocyclic structures, carboxylic groups and nitrogen. A ChemicalSubsta nceDefinitionTex t Chemical Identification Data Standard Std No.: 1 19938 Version 2 Final Draft July 26, 2005 Page 10 Name Definition Notes Format XML Tag 2.7 Chemical Substance Linear Structure Code The code that represents the connectivity of atoms in a molecule of a chemical substance as a linear formula, such as Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System ( SMILES). SRS will store this code for all single,

fully defined chemical substances, and a partial code where one or more components can be defined.

Example List of Values:

  SMILES notation for Triethylamine is CCN( CC) CC   SMILES notation for Ethanol is CCO   SMILES notation for Propionic acid is CCC(= O) O Note: Based on the business need,

additional metadata may be required to sufficiently describe an identifier.

This additional metadata is described in the Introduction section 1.5. d. A ChemicalSubsta nceLinearStruct ureCode 2.8 Chemical Structure Graphical Diagram A graphical representation of a molecule of a chemical substance as a two or three dimensional diagram. SRS will provide this diagram for all single, fully defined chemical substances, and a partial representation where one or more components can be defined. A ChemicalStructu reGraphicalDiag ram 2.9 Chemical Substance Comment Text The text that provides additional information about a chemical substance. Example List of Values:

  Chlordane with CAS No. 57

74 9 is also identified by CAS No. 12789 03 6. A ChemicalSubsta nceCommentTe xt Chemical Identification Data Standard Std No.: 1 19938 Version 2 Final Draft July 26, 2005 Page 11 Name Definition Notes Format XML Tag 2.10 Chemical Substance Synonym Name The name that is used as an alternative for representing a chemical substance. Example List of Values:

  Methoxyethane, 2 methoxy 2

methylpropane, and tert butyl methyl ether are Synonyms   Ethanol, Ethyl alcohol and Ethyl hydroxide are Synonyms   Vinyl chloride, Chloroethene and Ethylene monochloride are Synonyms A ChemicalSubsta nceSynonymNa me 2.11 Chemical Synonym Source Name The name of the source of an alternate name for a chemical substance. Example List of Values:

  RCRA   CERCLIS   AQS A ChemicalSynony mSourceName 2.12 Chemical Synonym Name The name that identifies the circumstance in which that name has been used. Example List of Values:

  Iron and Steel Industry   Pulp and Paper Industry   Aniline and Leather Manufacturing A ChemicalSynony mName 2.13 Chemical Synonym Name Status The name that documents the correctness of a synonym for a specific chemical. Example List of Values:

  Incomplete   Inaccurate   Ambiguous A ChemicalSynony mNameStatus Chemical Identification Data Standard Std No.: 1 19938 Version 2 Final Draft July 26, 2005 Page 12 Name Definition Notes Format XML Tag 2.14 Chemical Substance Classification Name The name that classifies chemical substances according to structural similarities. Example List of Values:

  Carbamates   Thiophosphates   Freons A ChemicalSubsta nceClassification Name 2.15 Chemical Preferred Acronym Name The name the US EPA has selected as the preferred acronym or otherwise abbreviated name in the SRS for a chemical substance,

when use of a shortened name is appropriate. Example List of Values:

  MEK for Methyl ethyl ketone   MTBE for Methyl tert butyl ether   PCB for Polychlorinated biphenyl A ChemicalPreferr edAcronymNam e Chemical Identification Data Standard Std No.: 1 19938 Version 2 Final Draft July 26, 2005 Page 13 Appendix A References 1. Interim Data Standard for Chemical Identification, Tom Maloney, May 6, 1999.

2. Reinventing Environmental Information ( REI) Interim Chemical Identification Data Standard, Chemical Data Standard Work Group Report, April 22, 1999.

3. Summary Report of Standard Data Elements for Chemical Substances, SDC 0055 057 TC 7015, December 2, 1997.

4. Rules for Representation of Chemical Data in Envirofacts Pilot Master Chemical Integrator, SDC 0055 057 LF 3019A, June 10, 1994.

5. Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number Data Standard, IRM Policy, Standards and Guidance/ IRM Strategic Planning Documents, EPA Directive No. 2180.1, June 26, 1987.

6. EPA Chemical Registry Name Selection Procedures, Drafted by the Chemical Name Selection Subgroup of the Chemical Identification Standard Business Rules Workgroup, Draft 1.1, February 29, 2000 ( rev. April 9, 2000). Chemical Identification Data Standard Std No.: 1 19938 Version 2 Final Draft July 26, 2005 Page 14 Appendix B Chemical Identification Data Structure Diagram Chemical Identification Data Standard 1.0 Mandatory Chemical Identification 1.1 EPA Chemical Internal Tracking Number 1.2 Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number 1.3 EPA Chemical Identifier 1.4 Chemical Substance Systematic Name 1.5 EPA Chemical Registry Name 2.0 Optional Chemical Identification 2.1 EPA Chemical Registry Name Source Text 2.2 EPA Chemical Registry Name 2.3 Molecular Formula Text 2.4 Chemical Substance Formula Weight Quantity 2.5 Chemical Substance Type Name 2.6 Chemical Substance Definition Text 2.7 Chemical Substance Linear Structure Code 2.8 Chemical Structure Graphical Diagram 2.9 Chemical Substance Comment Text 2.10 Chemical Substance Synonym Name 2.11 Chemical Synonym Source Name 2.12 Chemical Synonym Name 2.13 Chemical Synonym Name Status 2.14 Chemical Substance Classification Name 2.15 Chemical Preferred Acronym Name


[Federal Register: April 16, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 74)]
[Notices]
[Page 20723-20724]
[DOCID:fr16ap08-116]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon written request, copies available from: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549-0213.

Extension: Rule 17a-13, OMB Control No. 3235-0035, SEC File No. 270-
27.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of the extension of the
previously approved collection of information on the following rule:
Rule 17a-13 (17 CFR 240.17a-13) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S. C. 78a et seq.).
    Rule 17a-13(b) (17 CFR 17a-13(b)) generally requires that, at least
once each calendar quarter, all registered brokers and dealers
physically examine and count all securities held, and that they account
for all other securities not in their possession, but subject to the
broker-dealer's control or direction. Any discrepancies between the
broker-dealer's securities count and the firm's records must be noted
and, within seven days, the unaccounted for difference must be recorded
in the firm's records. Rule 17a-13(c) (17 CFR 240.17a-13(c)) provides
that under specified conditions, the securities counts, examination,
and verification of the broker-dealer's entire list of securities may
be conducted on a cyclical basis rather than on a certain date.
Although Rule 17a-13 does not require filing a report with the
Commission, discrepancies between a broker-dealer's records and the
securities counts may be required to be reported, for example, as a
loss on Form X-17A-5 (17 CFR 248.617), which must be filed with the

Commission under Rule 17a-5 (17 CFR 17a-5). Rule 17a-13 exempts broker-
dealers that limit their business to the sale and redemption of
securities of registered investment companies and interests or
participation in an insurance company separate account and those who
solicit accounts for federally insured savings and loan associations,
provided that such persons promptly transmit all funds and securities
and hold no customer funds and securities. The Rule also does not apply
to certain broker-dealers required to register only because they effect
transactions in securities futures products.
    The information obtained from Rule 17a-13 is used as an inventory
control device to monitor a broker-dealer's ability to account for all
securities held, in transfer, in transit, pledged, loaned, borrowed,
deposited, or otherwise subject to the firm's control or direction.
Discrepancies between the securities counts and the broker-dealer's
records alert the Commission and the Self Regulatory Organizations
(``SROs'') to those firms having problems in their back offices.
    Currently, there are approximately 5,700 broker-dealers registered
with the Commission. However, given the variability in their
businesses, it is difficult to quantify how many hours per year each
broker-dealer spends complying with the Rule. As noted, the Rule
requires a broker-dealer to account for all securities in its
possession. Many broker-dealers hold few, if any, securities; while
others hold large quantities. Therefore, the time burden of complying
with the Rule will depend on respondent-specific factors, including
size, number of customers, and proprietary trading activity. The staff
estimates that the average time spent per respondent on the Rule is 100
hours per year. This estimate takes into account the fact that more
than half the 5,700 respondents--according to financial reports filed
with the Commission--may spend little or no time in complying with the
Rule, given that they do not do a public securities business or do not
hold inventories of securities. For these reasons, the staff estimates
that the total compliance burden per year is 570,000 hours (5,700
respondents x 100 hours/respondent).
    The records required to be made by Rule 17a-13 are available only
to Commission examination staff, state securities authorities, and the
SROs. Subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (5
U.S.C. 522), and the Commission's rules thereunder (17 CFR
200.80(b)(4)(iii)), the Commission does not generally publish or make
available information contained in any reports, summaries, analyses,
letters, or memoranda arising out of, in anticipation of, or in
connection with an examination or inspection of the books and records
of any person or any other investigation.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Comments should be directed to (i) Desk Officer for the Securities
and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or by sending an e-mail to: Alexander--
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an e-
mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted within 30
days of this notice.

    Dated: April 9, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-8153 Filed 4-15-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: April 11, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 69)]
[Notices]
[Page 18320-18321]
[DOCID:fr11ap06-89]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ Project No. 12447-001]

Fort Dodge Hydroelectric Development Company; Notice of
Application Tendered for Filing with the Commission, Soliciting
Additional Study Requests, and Establishing Procedural Schedule for
Relicensing and a Deadline for Submission of Final Amendments

April 4, 2006.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Original License.
    b. Project No.: 12447-001.
    c. Date Filed: March 21, 2006.
    d. Applicant: Fort Dodge Hydroelectric Development Company.
    e. Name of Project: Fort Dodge Mill Dam Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Des Moines River in Webster County, Iowa. The
project does not occupy federal lands.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791 (a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Thomas J. Wilkinson, Jr., Fort Dodge
Hydroelectric Development Company, 1800 1st Ave., NE., Ste. 200, Cedar
Rapids, IA 52402;<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Stefanie Harris,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    j. Cooperating agencies: We are asking Federal, state, local, and
tribal agencies with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect
to environmental issues to cooperate with us in the preparation of the
environmental document. Agencies who would like to request cooperating
status should follow the instructions for filing comments described in
item l below. Cooperating agencies should note the Commission's policy
that agencies that cooperate in the preparation of the environmental
document cannot also intervene. See, 94 FERC ] 61,076 (2001).
    k. Pursuant to section 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR of the Commission's
regulations, if any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person believes
that an additional scientific study should be conducted in order to
form an adequate factual basis for a complete analysis of the
application on its merit, the resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person
must file a request for a study with the Commission not later than 60
days from the date of filing of the application, and serve a copy of
the request on the applicant.
    l. Deadline for filing additional study requests and requests for
cooperating agency status: May 22, 2006.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    Additional study requests and requests for cooperating agency
status may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper.
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
(http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``eFiling'' link.

    m. This application is not ready for environmental analysis at this
time.
    n. The Fort Dodge Mill Dam Project would consist of: (1) The
existing 342-foot-long by 18-foot-high concrete dam with a 230-foot-
long spillway and 5 Tainter gates; (2) a 90-acre reservoir with a
normal full pond elevation of 990 feet above mean sea level; (3) an
existing 40-foot-wide concrete intake structure with trash rack and
stop log guides; (4) an existing powerhouse to contain two proposed
turbine generating units with a total installed capacity of 1,400 kW;
(5) a proposed 2,400-foot-long, 13.8-kV transmission line; and (6)
appurtenant facilities. The applicant estimates that the total average
annual generation would be about 7,506 MWh.
    o. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''

link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-
866-208-3676, or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is also available for
inspection and reproduction at the address in item h above.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp
 to be notified via email of new filings and issuances

related to this or other pending projects.

For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.
    p. With this notice, we are initiating consultation with the Iowa
State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), as required by section 106,
National Historic Preservation Act, and the regulations of the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation, 36 CFR 800.4.
    q. Procedural schedule and final amendments: The application will
be processed according to the following Hydro Licensing Schedule.
Revisions to the schedule will be made as appropriate. The Commission
staff proposes to issue one environmental assessment rather than issue
a draft and final EA. Comments, terms and conditions, recommendations,
prescriptions, and reply comments, if any, will be addressed in an EA.
Staff intends to give at least 30 days for entities to comment on the
EA, and will take into consideration all comments received on the EA
before final action is taken on the license application.

Issue Acceptance or Deficiency Letter--May 2006
Issue Scoping Document--June 2006
Notice of application is ready for environmental analysis--August 2006
Notice of the availability of the EA--February 2007
Ready for Commission's decision on the application--April 2007

    Final amendments to the application must be filed with the
Commission no later than 30 days from the issuance date of the notice
of ready for environmental analysis.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-5294 Filed 4-10-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: August 10, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 154)]
[Notices]
[Page 45809]
[DOCID:fr10au06-53]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. RP06-452-000]

Stingray Pipeline Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Proposed Changes in
FERC Gas Tariff

August 3, 2006
    Take notice that on July 31, 2006, Stingray Pipeline Company,
L.L.C. (Stingray) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff,
Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become
effective August 31, 2006:

Tenth Revised Sheet No. 2.
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 143.
Second Revised Sheet No. 306.
First Revised Sheet No. 307.
First Revised Sheet No. 308.
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 309.
First Revised Sheet No. 310.
Second Revised Sheet No. 311.
Second Revised Sheet No. 312.
Original Sheet No. 312A.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-13072 Filed 8-9-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55798-55801]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17605]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98114; File No. SR-NYSECHX-2023-15]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Chicago, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
Fee Schedule of NYSE Chicago, Inc. To Adopt a Fee for Directed Orders
Routed Directly by the Exchange to an Alternative Trading System

August 11, 2023.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act''),\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that, on July 31, 2023, the NYSE Chicago, Inc. (``NYSE Chicago'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule of NYSE Chicago,
Inc. (the ``Fee Schedule'') to adopt a fee for Directed Orders routed
directly by the Exchange to an alternative trading system (``ATS'').
The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to adopt a fee for
Directed Orders routed directly by the Exchange to an ATS. The Exchange
proposes to implement the fee change effective August 1, 2023.
Background
    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') has repeatedly
expressed its preference for competition over regulatory intervention
in determining prices, products, and services in the securities
markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance
of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also,
recognized that current regulation of the market system ``has been
remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its broader
forms that are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (File No. S7-10-04) (Final
Rule) (``Regulation NMS'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While Regulation NMS has enhanced competition, it has also fostered
a ``fragmented'' market structure where trading in a single stock can
occur across multiple trading centers. When multiple trading centers
compete for order flow in the same stock, the Commission has recognized
that ``such competition can lead to the fragmentation of order flow in
that stock.'' \5\ Indeed, equity trading is currently dispersed across
16 exchanges,\6\ numerous alternative trading systems,\7\ and broker-
dealer internalizers and wholesalers, all competing for order flow.
Based on publicly available information, no single exchange currently
has more than 17% market share.\8\ Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the execution of equity order flow. More
specifically, the Exchange's share of executed volume of equity trades
in Tapes A, B and C securities is less than 1%.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61358, 75 FR 3594,
3597 (January 21, 2010) (File No. S7-02-10) (Concept Release on
Equity Market Structure).
    \6\ See Cboe U.S Equities Market Volume Summary, available at
https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share.
    \7\ See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available at https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/AtsIssueData. A list of
alternative trading systems registered with the Commission is
available at https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/atslist.htm.
    \8\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Equities Market Volume Summary,
available at http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
    \9\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can
move order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of
products. While it is not possible to know a firm's reason for shifting
order flow, the Exchange believes that one such reason is because of
fee changes at any of the registered exchanges or non-exchange venues
to which a firm routes order flow. Accordingly, competitive forces
constrain exchange transaction fees, and market participants can
readily trade on competing venues if they deem pricing levels at those
other venues to be more favorable.
Proposed Rule Change
    Pursuant to Commission approval, the Exchange adopted an order type
known as Directed Orders.\10\ Under Exchange rules, the ATS to which a
Directed Order is routed is responsible for validating whether the
order is eligible to be accepted, and if such ATS determines to reject
the order, the order would be cancelled. Directed Orders that are the
subject of this proposed rule change are those that are routed to
OneChronos LLC (``OneChronos'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ A Directed Order is a Limit Order with instructions to
route on arrival at its limit price to a specified ATS with which
the Exchange maintains an electronic linkage. See Rule 7.31(f)(4).
See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95425 (August 4, 2022),
87 FR 48735 (August 10, 2022) (SR-NYSECHX-2022-06).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange implemented the routing functionality to OneChronos on
November 21, 2022,\11\ and introduced the functionality at that time
without charging a fee.\12\ The Exchange now proposes to adopt a fee of
$0.0015 per share for Directed Orders routed to OneChronos. To reflect
the proposed fee, the Exchange proposes to amend footnote 1 under
current Section E. titled Transaction and Order Processing Fees. As
proposed, the first sentence under footnote 1 would state ``$0.0015 per
share for Directed Orders routed to OneChronos LLC.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/notifications/trader-update/110000486743/ALO_MPL_One_Chronos_Chicago.pdf.
    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 96433 (December 1,
2022), 87 FR 75113 (December 7, 2022) (SR-NYSECHX-2022-27).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since its implementation, the Directed Order functionality has
facilitated additional trading opportunities by offering Participants
\13\ the ability to designate orders submitted to the Exchange to be
routed to OneChronos for execution. The functionality has also created
efficiencies for Participants that choose to use the functionality by
enabling them to send orders that they wish to route to OneChronos
through the Exchange by leveraging order entry protocols already
configured for their interaction with the Exchange. Routing
functionality offered by the Exchange is completely optional and
Participants can readily select between various providers of routing
services, including other exchanges and non-exchange venues.
Participants that choose not to utilize Directed Orders would continue
to be able to trade on the Exchange as they currently do.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ A ``Participant'' is, except as otherwise described in the
Rules of the Exchange, ``any Participant Firm that holds a valid
Trading Permit and any person associated with a Participant Firm who
is registered with the Exchange under Articles 16 and 17 as a Market
Maker Authorized Trader or Institutional Broker Representative,
respectively.'' See Article 1, Rule 1(s).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with section 6(b) of the Act,\14\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\15\ in particular,
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed above, the Exchange operates in a highly fragmented
and competitive market. The Commission has repeatedly expressed its
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically,
in Regulation

NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can
shift order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of
products, in response to fee changes. Accordingly, changes to exchange
transaction fees can have a direct effect on the ability of an exchange
to compete for order flow.
    The routing of orders to OneChronos is provided by the Exchange on
a voluntary basis and no rule or regulation requires that the Exchange
offer it. Nor does any rule or regulation require market participants
to send orders to an ATS generally, let alone to OneChronos. The
routing of orders to OneChronos operates similarly to the Primary Only
Order already offered by the Exchange, which is an order that is routed
directly to the primary listing market on arrival, without interacting
with the interest on the Exchange Book.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Rule 7.31(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes its proposal equitably allocates its fees
among market participants. The Exchange believes that the proposal
represents an equitable allocation of fees because it would apply
uniformly to all Participants, in that all Participants will have the
ability to designate orders submitted to the Exchange to be routed to
OneChronos, and each such Participant would be charged the proposed fee
when utilizing the functionality. Without having a view of
Participants' activity on other exchanges and off-exchange venues, the
Exchange has no way of knowing whether the proposed fee would result in
any Participant from reducing or discontinuing its use of the routing
functionality. While the Exchange has no way of knowing whether this
proposed rule change would serve as a disincentive to utilize the order
type, the Exchange believes that a number of Participants will continue
to utilize the functionality because of the efficiencies created for
Participants that enables them to send orders that they wish to route
to OneChronos through the Exchange by leveraging order entry protocols
already configured for their interactions with the Exchange.
    The Exchange reiterates that the routing functionality offered by
the Exchange is completely optional and that the Exchange operates in a
highly competitive market in which market participants can readily
select between various providers of routing services with different
product offerings and different pricing. The Exchange believes that the
proposed flat fee structure for orders routed to away venues is a fair
and equitable approach to pricing, as it will provide certainty with
respect to execution fees.
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is not unfairly
discriminatory. The Exchange believes it is not unfairly discriminatory
as the proposal to charge a fee would be assessed on an equal basis to
all Participants that use the Directed Order functionality. Moreover,
this proposed rule change neither targets nor will it have a disparate
impact on any particular category of market participant. The Exchange
believes that this proposal does not permit unfair discrimination
because the changes described in this proposal would be applied to all
similarly situated Participants. Accordingly, no Participant already
operating on the Exchange would be disadvantaged by the proposed
allocation of fees. The Exchange further believes that the proposed
rule change would not permit unfair discrimination among Participants
because the Directed Order functionality would remain available to all
Participants on an equal basis and each such Participant would be
charged the same fee for using the functionality.
    Finally, the submission of orders to the Exchange is optional for
Participants in that they could choose whether to submit orders to the
Exchange and, if they do, the extent of its activity in this regard.
The Exchange believes that it is subject to significant competitive
forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement regarding the
burden on competition.
    For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal
is consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\18\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that the proposed change
furthers the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering
integrated competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient
pricing of individual stocks for all types of orders, large and
small.'' \19\ The Exchange does not believe that the proposed fee
change represents a significant departure from previous pricing offered
by the Exchange or pricing offered by the Exchange's competitors.
Participants may opt to disfavor the Exchange's pricing if they believe
that alternatives offer them better value. Accordingly, the Exchange
does not believe that the proposed change will impair the ability of
Participants or competing venues to maintain their competitive standing
in the financial markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
    \19\ See supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Intramarket Competition. The Exchange believes the proposed
amendment to its Fee Schedule would not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The Directed Order functionality is available to
all Participants and all Participants that use the functionality to
route their orders to OneChronos would be charged the proposed fee. The
routing of orders to OneChronos is provided by the Exchange on a
voluntary basis and no rule or regulation requires that the Exchange
offer it. Participants have the choice whether or not to use the
Directed Order functionality and those that choose not to utilize it
will not be impacted by the proposed rule change. The Exchange also
does not believe the proposed rule change would impact intramarket
competition as the proposed fee would apply to all Participants equally
that choose to utilize the Directed Order functionality, and therefore
the proposed change would not impose a disparate burden on competition
among market participants on the Exchange.
    Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily choose to
send their orders to other exchange and off-exchange venues if they
deem fee levels at those other venues to be more favorable. As noted
above, the Exchange's market share of intraday trading is currently
less than 1%. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually
adjust its fees and rebates to remain competitive with other exchanges
and with off-exchange venues. Because competitors are free to modify
their own fees and credits in response, and because market participants
may readily adjust their order routing practices, the Exchange

does not believe its proposed fee change can impose any burden on
intermarket competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective upon filing pursuant
to section 19(b)(3)(A) \20\ of the Act and paragraph (f) thereunder. At
any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-NYSECHX-2023-15 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSECHX-2023-15. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSECHX-2023-15 and should
be submitted on or before September 6, 2023.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-17605 Filed 8-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


                                                                      9110-04-P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
[Docket No. USCG-2022-0156]
Information Collection Request to Office of Management and Budget; OMB Control Number:  1625-0067
AGENCY:  Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION:  Sixty-day notice requesting comments.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY:  In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting an extension of its approval for the following collection of information:  1625-0067, Claims under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990; without change.
Our ICR describes the information we seek to collect from the public.  Before submitting this ICR to OIRA, the Coast Guard is inviting comments as described below.
DATES:  Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
ADDRESSES:  You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket number [USCG-2022-0156] to the Coast Guard using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.  See the "Public participation and request for comments" portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments.
      A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.  Additionally, copies are available from:  COMMANDANT (CG-6P), ATTN:  PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT MANAGER, U.S. COAST GUARD, 2703 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. AVE SE., STOP 7710, WASHINGTON, DC 20593-7710.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  A.L. Craig, Office of Privacy Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, for questions on these documents.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public participation and request for comments
      This notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., chapter 35, as amended.  An ICR is an application to OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's likely burden on the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection, and other important information describing the Collection. There is one ICR for each Collection.
      The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper performance of Departmental functions.  In particular, the Coast Guard would appreciate comments addressing:  (1) the practical utility of the Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
      In response to your comments, we may revise this ICR or decide not to seek an extension of approval for the Collection.  We will consider all comments and material received during the comment period.
      We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments and related materials.  Comments must contain the OMB Control Number of the ICR and the docket number of this request, [USCG-2022-0156], and must be received by [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
Submitting comments
      We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.  If your material cannot be submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions.  Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public comments, are in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's instructions.  Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted.
      We accept anonymous comments.  All comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided.  For more about privacy and submissions in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).

Information Collection Request
      Title: Claims under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990.
      OMB Control Number: 1625-0067.
      Summary: This information collection provides the means to develop and submit a claim to the National Pollution Funds Center to seek compensation for removal costs and damages incurred resulting from an oil discharge or substantial threat of discharge.  This collection also provides the requirements for a responsible party to advertise where claims may be sent after an incident occurs.
      Need: This information collection is required by 33 CFR part 136, for

implementing 33 U.S.C. 2713(e) and 33 U.S.C. 2714(b).

      Forms: None.
      Respondents:  Claimants.
      Frequency: On occasion.
      Hour Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has decreased from 2,620 hours to 1,557 hours a year, due to a decrease in the estimated annual number of responses.
      Authority:  The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended.
Dated:  March 30, 2022.

Kathleen Claffie,
Chief, Office of Privacy Management,
U.S. Coast Guard.


[Federal Register: January 7, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 4)]
[Notices]
[Page 703]
[DOCID:fr07ja09-34]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 8646-043]

Robert N. Fackrell; Mink Creek Hydro LLC; Notice of Application
for Transfer of License, and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene,
and Protests

December 30, 2008.
    On October 31, 2008, Robert N. Fackrell (Transferor) and Mink Creek
Hydro LLC (Transferee) filed an application, for transfer of license of
the Mink Creek Hydroelectric Project, located on Mink Creek in Franklin
County, Idaho.
    Applicants seek Commission approval to transfer the license for the
Mink Creek Hydro Project to Mink Creek Hydro LLC.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Robert N. Fackrell, Corporate Manager, Mink
Creek Hydro LLC, P.O. Box 1, Preston, ID 83263, phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene: 30 days from
the issuance of this notice. Comments, motions to intervene, and
notices of intent may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-
comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-8646)
in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call
toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-31428 Filed 1-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14104-14105]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06134]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER15-794-002.
    Applicants: Catalyst Paper Operations Inc..
    Description: Tariff Amendment per 35.17(b): Revised Amended MBR
Tariff Application to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 3/10/15.
    Accession Number: 20150310-5153.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/31/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-820-001.
    Applicants: Zone One Energy, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment per 35.17(b): Baseline New to be
effective 4/15/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/11/15.
    Accession Number: 20150311-5010.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/1/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1212-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc..
    Description: Tariff Amendment per 35.17(b): 1876R4 Kansas Electric
Power Cooperative, Inc. NITSA NOA Ministerial Filing to be effective 3/
1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/10/15.
    Accession Number: 20150310-5171.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/31/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1215-000.

    Applicants: Avista Corporation.
    Description: Section 205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii):
Avista Corp Rate Schedule FERC No. 548 to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 3/10/15.
    Accession Number: 20150310-5175.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/31/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1216-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: Section 205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): OATT
Revised Definitions and Attachment T (Demand Response) to be effective
3/11/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/10/15.
    Accession Number: 20150310-5190.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/31/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1217-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Section 205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): GIA
and Distribution Service Agmt with Cal Sunrise LLC to be effective 5/
11/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/11/15.
    Accession Number: 20150311-5004.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/1/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1218-000.
    Applicants: Solar Star California XIII, LLC.
    Description: Initial rate filing per 35.12 Solar Star California
XIII, LLC Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/11/15.
    Accession Number: 20150311-5049.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/1/15.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 11, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06134 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 111 (Monday, June 10, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26851-26852]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12182]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9995-08-Region 8]

Public Water System Supervision Program Revision for the State of
Utah

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public notice is hereby given that the state of Utah has
revised its Public Water System Supervision (PWSS) Program by adopting
federal regulations for the Revised Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) that
correspond to the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWR).
The EPA has reviewed Utah's regulations and determined they are no less
stringent than the federal regulations. The EPA is proposing to approve
Utah's primacy revision for the RTCR.
    This approval action does not extend to public water systems in
Indian country. Please see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, Item B.

DATES: Any member of the public is invited to request a public hearing
on this determination by July 10, 2019. Please see SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION, Item C, for details. Should no timely and appropriate
request for a hearing be received, and the Regional Administrator (RA)
does not elect to hold a hearing on his/her own motion, this
determination shall become applicable July 10, 2019. If a public
hearing is requested and granted, then this determination shall not
become applicable until such time following the hearing as the RA
issues an order affirming or rescinding this action.

ADDRESSES: Requests for a public hearing should be addressed to: Robert
Clement, Drinking Water B Section, EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, CO 80202-1129.
    All documents relating to this determination are available for
inspection at: EPA Region 8, Drinking Water Section (5th Floor), 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Clement, Drinking Water B
Section, EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO 80202-1129,
phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the provisions of section
1413 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), 42 U.S.C. 300g-2, and 40
CFR 142.13, public notice is hereby given that the state of Utah has
revised its PWSS program by adopting federal regulations for the RTCR
that correspond to the NPDWR in 40 CFR parts 141 and 142. The EPA has
reviewed Utah's regulations and determined they are no less stringent
than the federal regulations. The EPA is proposing to approve Utah's
primacy revision for the RTCR.
    This approval action does not extend to public water systems in
Indian country as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Please see SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION, Item B.

A. Why are revisions to state programs necessary?

    States with primary PWSS enforcement authority must comply with the
requirements of 40 CFR part 142 to maintain primacy. They must adopt
regulations that are at least as

stringent as the NPDWRs at 40 CFR parts 141 and 142, as well as adopt
all new and revised NPDWRs in order to retain primacy (40 CFR
142.12(a)).

B. How does this action affect Indian country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in Utah?

    The EPA's approval of Utah's revised PWSS program does not extend
to Indian country as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Indian country in Utah
generally includes (1) lands within the exterior boundaries of the
following Indian reservations located within Utah, in part or in full:
The Goshute Reservation, the Navajo Indian Reservation, the reservation
lands of the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah (Cedar Band of Paiutes, Kanosh
Band of Paiutes, Koosharem Band of Paiutes, Indian Peaks Band of
Paiutes and Shivwits Band of Paiutes), the Skull Valley Indian
Reservation, the Uintah and Ouray Reservation (subject to federal court
decisions removing certain lands from Indian country status within the
Uintah and Ouray Reservations), and the Washakie Reservation; (2) any
land held in trust by the United States for an Indian tribe; and (3)
any other areas which are ``Indian country'' within the meaning of 18
U.S.C. 1151. The EPA or eligible Indian tribes, as appropriate, will
retain PWSS program responsibilities over public water systems in
Indian country.

C. Requesting a Hearing

    Any member of the public may request a hearing on this
determination within thirty (30) days of this notice. All requests
shall include the following information: Name, address, and telephone
number of the individual, organization, or other entity requesting a
hearing; a brief statement of interest and information to be submitted
at the hearing; and a signature of the interested individual or
responsible official, if made on behalf of an organization or other
entity. Frivolous or insubstantial requests for a hearing may be denied
by the RA.
    Notice of any hearing shall be given not less than fifteen (15)
days prior to the time scheduled for the hearing and will be made by
the RA in the Federal Register and in a newspaper of general
circulation in the state. A notice will also be sent to both the
person(s) requesting the hearing and the state. The hearing notice will
include a statement of purpose of the hearing, information regarding
time and location for the hearing, and the address and telephone number
where interested persons may obtain further information. The RA will
issue an order affirming or rescinding the determination upon review of
the hearing record.
    Please bring this notice to the attention of any persons known by
you to have an interest in this determination.

    Dated: May 28, 2019.
Gregory Sopkin,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2019-12182 Filed 6-7-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: October 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 192)]
[Notices]
[Page 61470]
[DOCID:fr05oc10-73]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-2951-000]

Shipyard Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

September 29, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Shipyard Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is October 19, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24969 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


CFA Open Molding Styrene Emissions Test Project Spray Up Baseline Study Composite Graph  All Spray Up Runs 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 0: 00: 20 0: 03: 00 0: 06: 00 0: 09: 00 0: 12: 00 0: 15: 00 0: 18: 00 0: 21: 00 0: 24: 00 0: 27: 00 0: 30: 00 0: 33: 00 0: 36: 00 0: 39: 00 0: 42: 00 0: 45: 00 0: 48: 00 0: 51: 00 0: 54: 00 0: 57: 00 1: 00: 00 1: 03: 00 1: 06: 00 1: 09: 00 1: 12: 00 1: 15: 00 1: 18: 00 1: 21: 00 1: 24: 00 1: 27: 00 1: 30: 00 1: 33: 00 1: 36: 00 1: 39: 00 1: 42: 00 1: 45: 00 1: 48: 00 1: 51: 00 1: 54: 00 Time  (h: mm: ss) PPM  Stack Concentration Series1 Series2 Series3 Series4 Series5 Series6 Series7 Series8 Series9 Series10 Series11 Series12 Series13 Series14 Series15 Series16 Series17 Series18 Series19 Average Emissions Profile  All Spray Up Runs 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 ppm  Stack Concentration © CFA 1996 CFA Open Molding Styrene Emissions Test Project Spray Up Baseline Study 0 0: 00: 20 0: 03: 00 0: 06: 00 0: 09: 00 0: 12: 00 0: 15: 00 0: 18: 00 0: 21: 00 0: 24: 00 0: 27: 00 0: 30: 00 0: 33: 00 0: 36: 00 0: 39: 00 0: 42: 00 0: 45: 00 0: 48: 00 0: 51: 00 0: 54: 00 0: 57: 00 1: 00: 00 1: 03: 00 1: 06: 00 1: 09: 00 1: 12: 00 1: 15: 00 1: 18: 00 1: 21: 00 1: 24: 00 1: 27: 00 1: 30: 00 1: 33: 00 1: 36: 00 1: 39: 00 1: 42: 00 1: 45: 00 1: 48: 00 1: 51: 00 1: 54: 00 Time  (h: mm: ss)

© CFA 1996