Established or Recommended Tolerance,

ppm

Data

Source 2

No. of Samples

(detects)

½

LOD (PDP) or ½ LOQ (FT data)

Processing Factors 3

% CT4

Anticipated Residue (ppm)

or RDF #

Avg

Max

Chronic5

Acute

Almonds	All

PB	0.01

Almond

Field Trial data

12

(0)

0.005

1

2.5

0.005

RDF#1

Almonds-oil

All

B	0.01

Almond

Field Trial data

24

(12)

0.005

100

100

0.1149

0.1149

Amaranth, leafy

All

PB	6.0

 Spinach

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

3.867

RDF# 58

Apples fruit with peel

All

NB	0.5

Apple Field Trial Data

28

(28)

0.005

0.83 wash

69

73

0.0204

RDF# 2

Apple peeled fruit

All

PB/NB	0.5

Apple Field Trial Data

28

(28)

0.005

69

73

0.0204

RDF# 2

Apples-dried

All

B	0.5

Apple Field Trial Data

28

(28)

0.005

0.23

69

73

0.0204

0.0204

Apples-juice

All

PB	0.5

Apple Field Trial Data

28

(28)

0.005

0.04

69

73

0.0204

RDF# 2

Apples-Sauce

All

PB	0.5

Apple

Field Trial Data

28

(28)

0.005

0.21

69

73

0.0204

RDF# 2

Apricot juice

All

PB	0.3

Peach

Field Trial Data

68

(68)

0.005

100

100

0.0878

RDF# 3

Apricot

All

NB/PB	0.3

Peach

Field Trial Data

68

(68)

0.005

100

100

0.0878

RDF# 3

Apricot-dried

All

B	0.3

Peach

Field Trial Data

68

(68)

0.005

6.0

(DEEM Default)

100

100

0.0878

0.0878

Arugula

All

PB

6.0

Spinach

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

3.867

RDF# 58

Balsam Pear

All

NB

0.1

Cucumber

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

0.0269

RDF# 61

Beans-seed	All	B	0.15	Dried Beans

Field Trial Data	40

(30)	0.05

100

100	0.0286

0.0286

Brazil Nut

	All	PB

	0.01

	Pecan

Field Trial Data

	14

(0)

	0.005

	100

	100

	0.005

	0.005

Broccoli

All

NB/PB

2.5

2001-02 PDP

Broccoli

333

(0)

0.03

1

2.5

0.0003

(FHE)

RDF# 4

Broccoli, Chinese

All

NB

2.5

2001-02 PDP

Broccoli

333

(0)

0.03

100

100

0.03

RDF# 50

Broccoli, raab

All

NB

2.5

Mustard Green

Field Trial Data

30

(30)

0.005

100

100

2.686

RDF# 54

Brussels Sprouts

All

NB/PB

2.5

Cabbage FT Data

38

(38)

0.005

100

100

0.5564

RDF# 51

Cabbage

All

NB/PB

2.5

Cabbage

Field Trial data

38

(38)

0.005

5

5

0.5564

RDF# 5

Cabbage, Chinese, bok choy

All

PB

7.0

Mustard Greens

FT Data

30

(30)

0.005

100

100

2.686

RDF# 54

Cabbage, Chinese, napa

All

NB/PB

2.5

Cabbage FT Data

38

(38)

0.005

100

100

0.5564

RDF# 51

Cabbage, Chinese, mustard

All

NB/PB

2.5

Broccoli PDP Data

333

(0)

0.03

100

100

0.03

RDF# 50

Cantaloupe

All

NB/PB	0.1

 Cantaloupe

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

0.14

(peeling)

1

2.5

0.0268

RDF# 6

Cardoon

All

NB	6.0

Celery

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

1.168

RDF# 9

Carrots

All

NB/PB

0.2

2000-02 PDP

Carrots

1477

(0)

0.03

5

5

0.0015

(FHE)

RDF# 7

Carrots Juice

All

NB/PB

0.2

2000-02 PDP

Carrots

1477

(0)

0.03

0.53

5

5

0.03

RDF# 7

Casaba

All

NB

0.1

 Cantaloupe

Field Trial Data

24

(0)

0.005

100

100

0.0268

RDF# 52

Cashew

All

PB	0.01

Pecan

Field Trial data

14

(0)

0.005

100

100

0.005

0.005

Cauliflower

All

NB/PB

2.5

2004-05 PDP

Cauliflower

926

(0)

0.03

5

5

0.0135

(FHE)

RDF# 8

Celery

All

NB/PB	6.0

Celery

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

0.27 trim

100

100

1.168

RDF# 9

Celery Juice

All

PB	6.0

Celery

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

1.168

RDF# 9

Celtuce

All

NB

6.0

Celery

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

1.168

RDF# 9

Chayote, fruit

All

NB	0.1

Squash

Field Trial Data

20

(20)

0.005

100

100

0.0394

RDF# 59

Cherries	All	PB	0.3

	Cherry

Field Trial Data

44

(44)

0.005

0.8 wash

100

100

0.1262

RDF# 10

Cherries-juice

All

PB	0.3

Cherry

Field Trial Data

44

(44)

0.005

1.5 (DEEM Default)

100

100

0.1262

RDF# 10

Chestnuts

All

PB	0.01

Almond

Field Trial Data

12

(0)

0.005

100

100

0.005

0.01

(Tol)

Chinese waxgourd

	All

	NB

	0.1

Cucumber

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

0.0269

RDF# 61

Chrysanthemum, garland

All

PB	6.0

 Spinach

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

3.867

RDF# 58

Citrus citron

All

NB	0.2

Orange

2004-05 PDP Data

1483

(0)

0.03

100

100

0.03

RDF# 55

Citrus hybrids

All

NB	0.2

Orange

2004-05 PDP Data

1483

(0)

0.03

100

100

0.03

RDF# 55

Citrus, oil

All

B	0.3

Orange

2004-05 PDP Data

1483

(0)

0.03

10

20

0.03

0.03

Collards

	All

	PB

7.0

Mustard Greens

Field Trial Data

	30

(30)

0.005

0.45

22

45

2.686

RDF# 11

Corn, field bran

All

B

0.01

Field Corn

Tolerance

NA

0.005

5

10

0.005

0.005

Corn, field flour

All

B

0.01

Field Corn

Tolerance

NA

0.005

5

10

0.005

0.005

Corn, field meal

All

B

0.01

Field Corn

Tolerance

NA

0.005

5

10

0.005

0.005

Corn, field  oil

All

B

0.01

Field Corn

Tolerance

NA

0.005

5

10

0.005

0.005

Corn, field starch

All

B

0.01

Field Corn

Tolerance

NA

0.005

5

10

0.005

0.005

Corn, field syrup

All

B

0.01

Field Corn

Tolerance

NA

0.005

1.5

5

10

0.005

0.005

Corn pop

All

B

0.01

Field Corn

Tolerance

NA

0.005

5

10

0.005

0.005

Corn, Sweet	Fresh	NB	0.05	Sweet Corn 2002 PDP Data	727

(0)	0.02

5	8	0.002

(FHE)	RDF# 12

Corn, sweet	Frozen

NB

0.05

Sweet Corn (frozen) 2003 PDP Data

547

(0)

0.02

10

20

0.002

(FHE)

RDF #14

Corn, sweet

Canned

PB

0.01

Sweet Corn (canned)2001 PDP Data

181

(0)

0.02

10

20

0.002

(FHE)

RDF# 13

Cottonseed-oil

All

B

2.0

Cotton

Field Trial Data

23

(23)

0.0025

1.38

oil

10

10

0.1161

0.1161

Cress-garden/upland

All

PB

6.0

 Spinach

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

3.867

RDF# 58

Cucumber

All

NB/PB	0.1

Cucumber

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

0.75

(washing)

1

2.5

0.0269

RDF# 15

Dandelion-leaves

All

PB

6.0

 Spinach

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

3.867

RDF# 58

Eggplant

All

NB/PB	0.5

Sweet Pepper

2002-03 PDP Data

927

(0)

0.15

100

100

0.15

RDF# 56

Endive

All

PB

6.0

 Spinach

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

3.867

RDF# 58

Fennel, florence

N/A

NB	6.0

Celery

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

1.168

RDF# 9

Filbert

All

PB

0.01

Pecan

Field Trial Data

14

(0)

0.005

100

100

0.005

0.005

Filbert oil

All

B	0.01

Pecan

Field Trial Data

14

(0)

0.005

100

100

0.005

0.005

Grapes

All

PB

1.0

Grapes

Field Trial Data

44

(44)

0.005

0.8

(washing)

15

24

0.1648

RDF# 16

Grapes-juice

All

PB

1.0

Grapes

Field Trial Data

44

(44)

0.005

0.007

15

24

0.1648

RDF# 16

Grapes-leaves

All

PB

1.0

Grapes

Field Trial Data

44

(44)

0.005

15

24

0.1648

RDF# 16

Grapes-raisins

All

PB

3.5

Grapes

Field Trial Data

44

(44)

0.005

4.3

15

24

0.1648

RDF# 16

Grapes-wine & sherry

All

PB

1.0

Grapes

Field Trial Data

44

(44)

0.005

15

24

0.1648

RDF# 16

Grapefruit

All

NB/PB

0.2

Grapefruit

2005 PDP Data

742

(0)

0.015

1

5

0.0003

(FHE)

RDF# 17

Grapefruit-juice

All

PB

0.2

Orange Juice

2004-05 PDP data

930

(0)

0.03

1

5

0.0003

(FHE)

RDF# 18

Hickory nut

All

PB	0.01

Pecan

Field Trial Data

14

(0)

0.005

100

100

0.005

0.005

Honeydew

All

NB/PB	0.1

 Cantaloupe

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

0.0268

RDF# 52

Hops

All

B

20

Tolerance

NA

--

100

100

20

20

Kale

All

PB

7.0

Mustard Green

Field Trial Data

30

(30)

0.005

0.45

13

18

2.686

RDF# 62

Kohlrabi

All

NB

2.5

Cabbage

Field Trial Data

18

(18)

0.005

100

100

0.5564

RDF #51

Kumquats

All

NB

0.2

Orange

2004-05 PDP Data

1483

(0)

0.03

100

100

0.03

RDF# 55

Lemon

All

NB/PB

0.2

Orange

2004-05PDP Data

1483

(0)

0.03

5

15

0.0015

(FHE)

RDF# 19

Lemons-juice

All

PB

0.2

Orange Juice

2004-05 PDP

data

930

(0)

0.03

5

15

0.0015

(FHE)

RDF# 20

Lemons-peel

All

PB

0.2

Lemon FT Data

8

(8)

0.0025

5

15

0.067

RDF# 21

Lettuce - head

All

NB/PB

6.0

Head Lettuce

2004-05 PDP data

429

(0)

0.14

5

5

0.14

RDF# 22

Lettuce - leaf

All

PB

3

 Leaf Lettuce 2004-2005 PDP Data

678

(19)

0.14

5

5

0.015

RDF# 23

Limes

All

PB

0.2

Orange

2004-05 PDP Data

1483

(0)

0.03

100

100

0.0015

(FHE)

RDF# 19

Limes-juice

	All

PB

0.2

Orange Juice

2005-05 PDP data

930

(0)

0.02

100

100

0.0015

(FHE)

RDF# 20

Loquat

All

NB

0.5

Pears

Field Trial Data

14

(14)

0.005

100

100

0.0243

RDF# 56

Macadamia nuts

All

PB

0.2

Pecan

Field Trial Data

14

(0)

0.005

100

100

0.005

0.005

Milk

All

1

Anticipated Residue based on combined dermal application and secondary residue (or FHE for chronic)

21

(21)

100

100

0.05936

RDF# 48

Mustard greens	All

PB

7

Mustard Greens

Field Trial Data

30

(30)

0.005

0.45

(washing)

7

13

2.686

RDF# 24

Nectarines

All

NB	0.3

Peach

Field Trial Data

68

(68)

0.005

100

100

0.0878

RDF# 3

Okra

All

NB/PB	0.5

Sweet Pepper

2002-04 PDP Data

1485

(1)

0.45

100

100

0.45

RDF# 57

Oranges

All

NB/PB

0.2

Orange

2004-05 PDP Data

1483

(0)

0.03

10

20

0.003

(FHE)

RDF# 26

Oranges-juice

All

PB

0.2

Orange Juice

2004-05 PDP data

930

(0)

0.02

10

20

0.003

(FHE)

RDF# 25

Oranges-peel

All

PB

0.2

Orange

FT Data

12

(12)

0.0025

10

20

0.035

RDF# 27

Parsley leaves

All

PB	6.0

 Spinach

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

3.867

RDF# 58

Peas -dry

All

B

0.15

Peas-dry

Field Trial Data

16

(8)

0.005

100

100

0.0396

0.0396

Peas-succulent

All

PB

0.25

Tolerance

--

100

100

0.25

0.25

Peas, edible podded succulent

All

PB

0.25

Tolerance

--

100

100

0.25

RDF #30

Peaches

All

NB/PB	0.3

	Peach

Field Trial Data

68

(68)

0.005

43

46

0.0878

RDF# 28

Peaches-dried

All

B

0.3

Peach

Field Trial Data

68

(68)

0.005

2.9

43

46

0.0878

0.0878

Peaches-juice

All

PB	0.3

Peach

Field Trial Data

68

(68)

0.005

43

46

0.0878

RDF# 28

Peanut

All

B	0.01

Peanut

Field Trial Data

22

(0)

0.0015

0.5 dry roast

100

100

0.0015

0.0015

Peanut butter

All

B	0.01

Peanut

Field Trial Data

22

(0)

0.0015

1.89

100

100

0.0015

0.0015

Peanut oil

All

B	0.01

Peanut

Field Trial Data

22

(0)

0.0015

6.3 oil

100

100

0.0015

0.0015

Pears

All

NB/PB	0.5

Pears

Field Trial Data

14

(14)

0.005

62

66

0.0243

RDF# 29

Pears-dried

All

B	0.5

Pears

Field Trial Data

14

(14)

0.005

6.25

62

66

0.0243

0.0243

Pears-juice

All

PB	0.5

Pears

Field Trial Data

14

(14)

0.005

62

66

0.0243

RDF# 29

Pecans

All

PB

0.01

Pecan

Field Trial Data

14

(0)

0.005

1

2.5

0.005

0.005

Peppers-Bell

All

NB/PB

0.5

Sweet Peppers

2002-04 PDP data

1485

(1)

0.45

10

20

0.45

RDF# 32

Peppers-bell dried

All

B

0.5

Sweet Peppers

2002-04 PDP data

1485

(0)

0.45

10

20

0.45

0.45

Pepper-nonbell

All

NB/PB

0.5

Sweet Peppers

2002-04 PDP data

1485

(1)

0.45

10

20

0.45

RDF# 32

Peppers - nonbell dried

All

B

0.5

Sweet Peppers

2002-04 PDP data

1485

(1)

0.45

10

20

0.045

0.0225

Pistachio

All

PB	0.01

Almond

Field Trial data

24

(12)

0.005

100

100

0.005

0.1

(Tol)

Plums

All

NB/PB

0.3

Plums

Field Trial Data

44

(44)

0.001

37

41

0.0201

RDF# 33

Plum, prune dried

All

PB	0.3

Plums

Field Trial Data

44

(44)

0.001

3.2

(drying)

37

41

0.0201

RDF# 33

Plum, prune fresh

All

NB	0.3

Plums

Field Trial Data

44

(44)

0.001

37

41

0.0201

RDF# 33

Plum, prune juice

All

PB	0.3

Plums

Field Trial Data

44

(44)

0.001

1.4

37

41

0.0201

RDF# 33

Potato, chip

All

B

0.01

Tolerance	-

0.03

25

35

0.01

0.01

Potato, dry

(granules/flakes)

All

B

0.01

Tolerance	-

0.03

25

35

0.01

0.01

Potato, flour

All	B	0.01	Tolerance	-	0.03

25

35

0.01

0.01

Potato tuber w/o peel

All

NB/PB

0.01

Potato

2000-02 PDP Data

1472

(0)

0.03

25

35

0.01

(Tol)

RDF# 34

Potatoes w peel

All

NB

Potato

2000-02 PDP Data

1472

(0)

0.03

25

35

0.01

(Tol)

RDF# 34

Pumpkin

All

NB/PB	0.1

Squash

Field Trial Data

20

(20)

0.005

1

2.5

0.0394

RDF# 35

Pumpkin seed

All

B

0.1

Squash

Field Trial Data

20

(20)

0.005

1

2.5

0.0394

0.0394

Quinces	All	NB	0.5

Pears

Field Trial Data

14

(14)

0.005

100

100

0.0243

RDF#56

Radicchio

	All

	NB

	6.0

	Head Lettuce 2004-05 PDP Data	429

(0)

	0.27

100

	100

	0.27

	RDF# 53

Radish root

All

NB/PB	1.0

Radish

Tolerance

2

(2)

0.005

100

100

1.0

1.0

Rape greens

All

PB

7.0

Mustard Greens

Field Trial Data

30

(30)

0.005

100

100

2.686

RDF# 54

Rhubarb

All

NB/PB

6.0

Celery

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

1.168

RDF# 9

Sorghum grain

All

B

4.0

Sorghum FT

7 (7)

0.005

1

2.5

0.764

(FHE)

0.764

Sorghum syrup

All

B

4.0

Sorghum FT

7 (7)

--

1

2.5

0.764

(FHE)

0.764

Soybean, flour

All

B

0.03

Tolerance

NA

--

1

2.5

0.03

0.03

Soybean, seed

All

B

0.03

Tolerance

NA

--

1

2.5

0.03

0.03

Soybean, soy milk

All

B

0.03

Tolerance

NA

--

1

2.5

0.03

0.03

Soybean, oil

All

B

0.03

Tolerance

NA

--

0.56

1

2.5

0.03

0.03

Spinach

All

PB

6.0

Leaf Lettuce

2004-05

PDP Data

678

(19)

0.14

39

46

3.867

(Avg FT)

RDF# 64

Squash, winter

All

NB/PB

0.1

Squash

Field Trial Data

20

(20)

0.005

0.5 wash

5

5

0.0394

RDF# 37

Squash, summer

All

NB/PB

0.1

Squash

Field Trial Data

20

(20)

0.005

0.5 wash

5

5

0.0394

RDF# 37

Sugarcane, molasses

All

B	0.20

Sugarcane

Field Trial Data

10

0.005

0.73 molasses

1

5

0.013

0.013

Sugarcane, sugar

All

B

0.05

Sugarcane

Field Trial Data

10

0.005

0.1

1

5

0.013

0.013

Sunflower, oil

All

B	0.02

Sunflower

Field Trial Data

2

(2)

0.005

1.06

1

5

0.01

0.01

Sunflower, seed

All

B	0.02

Sunflower

Field Trial Data

2

(2)

0.005

1

5

0.01

0.01

Swiss chard

All

NB

6.0

Celery

Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

100

100

1.168

RDF# 9

Tangerine

All

NB

4

Orange

2004-05 PDP Data

1483

(0)

0.03

10

15

0.003

(FHE)

RDF# 38

Tangerines-juice

All

PB

0.2

Orange Juice

2004-05 PDP data

930

(0)

0.02

10

15

0.003

(FHE)

RDF# 39

Tomatillo

All

NB/PB

0.5

Tomato

2003-04 PDP Data

1486

(0)

0.04

100

100

0.04

RDF# 60

Tomato

All

NB/PB

0.5

Tomato

2003-04 PDP Data

1486

(0)

0.04

5

30

0.002

(FHE)

RDF# 40

Tomatoes-dried

All

B

0.5

Tomato

2003-04 PDP Data

1486

(0)

0.04

5

30

0.002

(FHE)

0.04

Tomatoes-juice

All

PB

0.5

Tomato-canned

2000 PDP data

163

(0)

0.03

5

30

0.0015

RDF# 41

Tomatoes-paste

All

B

0.5

Tomato-paste

2002 PDP data

369

(0)

0.02

5

30

0.00113

(FHE)

0.02

Tomatoes-puree

Canned

B

0.5

Tomato-canned

2000 PDP data

163

(0)

0.03

5

8

0.03

0.03

Tuberous and Corm Vegetables (except potato)

Arrowroot, Jerusalem Artichoke, Cassava, Dasheen, Ginger, Sweet Potato, Tanier, Turmeric, Yam

NB

0.01

Tolerance

-

-

-

100

100

0.01

0.01

Walnuts

All

PB	0.01

Pecan

Field Trial Data

14

(0)

0.005

100

100

0.005

0.005

Turnip green

All

PB

7.0

Mustard Green

Field Trial Data

30

(30)

0.005

0.45 wash

14

21

2.686

RDF# 63

Watermelon

All

NB	0.1

Cantaloupe

 Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

1

2.5

0.0268

RDF# 43

Watermelon juice

All

PB	0.1

Cantaloupe

 Field Trial Data

24

(24)

0.005

1

2.5

0.0268

RDF# 43

Wheat-bran

All

B

0.5

Wheat

Field Trial Data

40

(40)

0.005

1.8

2

3

0.048

0.048

Wheat-flour

All

B

0.15

Wheat

Field Trial Data

40

(40)

0.005

0.9

2

3

0.048

0.048

Wheat-germ

All

B

0.15

Wheat

Field Trial Data

40

(40)

0.005

0.4

2

3

0.048

0.048

Wheat-grain

All

B

0.15

Wheat

Field Trial Data

40

(40)

0.005

2

3

0.048

0.048

Alfalfa	All	B	5.0	Tolerance	-	-

1	5	5.0	5.0

Sugar Beet Sugar	All	B	0.10	Sugar Beet FT Data	24

(15)	0.0015	0.3	100	100	0.0105	0.0105

Sugar Beet Molasses	All	B	0.10	Sugar Beet FT Data	24

(15)	0.0015	0.2	100	100	0.0105	0.0105

Barley, Buckwheat, Oats, Rye Triticale	All	B	0.15	Wheat FT Data	40

(40)	0.005

100	100	0.048	0.048

Millet	All	B	0.15	Sorghum FT Data	7 (7)	-	-	100	100	0.764	0.764

1 Classification of blended (B), partially blended (PB), not blended (NB)

2 Tolerance, field trial data and Pesticide Data Program monitoring data (PDP)

3  Processing factors were available from studies shown in Table X and DEEM 7.81 default processing factors.

4  Based on BEAD’s memoranda prepared by Alan Halvorson, BEAD/EAB, (See Attachment 8)

5  Includes adjustment for percent crop treated (ppm)

Attachment 7: Residue Distribution Files and Point Estimates

RDF#1

Almonds.rdf

ALMONDS FT DATA 2.5%CT

12 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=468

TOTALNZ=12

12 @ 0.005

RDF#2

Apple.rdf

APPLES FT DATA 73%CT

28 samples/28 detects

TOTALZ=10

TOTALNZ=28

0.013   0.029

0.016   0.019

0.012   0.016

0.024   0.020

0.0079  0.018

0.027   0.028

0.018   0.015

0.014   0.020

0.036   0.058

0.011   0.011

0.022   0.017

0.024   0.036

0.0066  0.0099

0.027   0.017

RDF#3

Apricot.rdf

APRICOT (PEACH FT DATA)

100%CT

68 samples/68 detects

TOTALZ=0

TOTALNZ=68

0.172   0.164

0.172   0.157

0.125   0.123

0.098   0.122

0.077   0.050

0.105   0.249

0.108   0.088

0.039   0.073

0.100   0.129

0.154   0.164

0.105   0.102

0.062   0.080

0.086   0.086

0.084   0.085

0.060   0.058

0.032   0.055

0.096   0.076

0.066   0.104

0.085   0.077

0.097   0.098

0.063   0.093

0.086   0.082

0.045   0.061

0.044   0.057

0.084   0.067

0.047   0.050

0.084   0.073

0.072   0.074

0.082   0.086

0.070   0.060

0.117   0.095

0.038   0.044

0.054   0.071

0.074   0.032

BEANS, DRY- 100%CT FT DATA

Blended – No RDF

40 samples/30 detects

10, 0.005

0.011  0.014

0.025  0.026

0.021  0.024

0.059  0.026

0.022  0.027

0.091  0.106

0.146  0.124

0.020  0.017

0.014  0.014

0.028  0.022

0.020  0.031

0.030  0.055

0.016  0.010

0.033  0.016

0.025  0.021

Point estimate for acute assessment:  0.0286

CHRONIC

0.1149

CHRONIC

0.0204

CHRONIC

0.0878

CHRONIC

0.0286

RDF#4

Broccoli.rdf

BROCCOLI 2001-02 PDP DATA 2.5%CT

333 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=325

TOTALLOD=8

LODRES= 0.03

RDF#5

Cabbage.rdf

CABBAGE FT DATA 5%CT

38 samples/38 detects

TOTALZ=360

TOTALNZ=38

0.016   0.022     0.071

0.096   0.045     0.035

0.12     0.079     1.02

0.97     1.25       1.38

1.10     1.23       0.48

0.67     0.35       0.13

0.45     0.39       0.32

0.26     0.06       0.08

2.11     2.27       1.09

1.5       0.86       0.67

0.30     0.35       0.24

0.19     0.26       0.12

0.48     0.08

RDF#7

Carrots.rdf

CARROTS 2000-02 PDP DATA 5%CT

1477 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=1403

TOTALLOD=74

LODRES= 0.03

RDF#8

Cauliflower.rdf

CAULIFLOWER 2005 PDP DATA 5%CT

926 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=880

TOTALLOD=46

LODRES= 0.27

CHRONIC:  0.0003 ppm

(0.008 FHE used)

CHRONIC

0.5564

CHRONIC:  0.0015

(0.008 FHE used)

CHRONIC:  0.0135

RDF#6

Cantaloupes.rdf

CANTALOUPES FT DATA  2.5%CT

24 samples/24 detects

TOTALZ=936

TOTALNZ=24

0.017   0.026

0.013   0.021

0.024   0.028

0.028   0.031

0.022   0.015

0.018   0.017

0.042   0.040

0.042   0.044

0.030   0.027

0.022   0.016

0.040   0.033

0.024   0.022

RDF#9

Celery.rdf

CELERY FT DATA 100%CT

24 samples/24 detects

TOTALZ=0

TOTALNZ=24

1.95   2.09

1.87   2.09

1.41   1.29

1.04   1.11

1.49   1.84

1.19   1.38

0.984  1.21

2.05   3.03

0.049   0.053

0.154   0.400

0.088   0.770

0.370   0.126

RDF#10

Cherry.rdf

CHERRY FT DATA 100%CT

44 samples/44 detects

TOTALZ=0

TOTALNZ=44

0.218   0.269     0.153

0.276   0.098     0.108

0.130   0.088     0.073

0.072   0.096     0.114

0.047   0.052     0.057

0.058   0.119     0.135

0.081   0.134     0.087

0.056   0.071     0.094

0.169   0.160     0.210

0.215   0.100     0.093

0.104   0.084     0.250

0.231   0.133     0.181

0.161   0.141     0.133

0.126   0.090     0.098

0.090   0.098

RDF#11:  Collards.rdf

COLLARDS (mustard greens FT DATA)

45 %CT

30 samples/30 detects

TOTALZ= 37

TOTALNZ=30

2.28    1.79     1.19

1.53    0.79     0.96

0.59    0.29     1.65

1.34    5.76     6.19

2.63    3.89     3.01

2.78    3.55     3.28

3.40    2.95     4.53

5.39    3.21     3.00

2.37    2.92     3.41

2.29    2.26     1.35

CHRONIC

0.0268

CHRONIC

1.168

CHRONIC

0.1262

CHRONIC

2.686

Field Corn

Blended – No RDF

Field Corn FT Data 10%CT

Tolerance= 0.01 PPM

Point estimate for acute assessment:  0.005

RDF#12

Cornsweet.rdf

Sweet Corn  2002 PDP DATA

20%CT

727 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=582

TOTALLOD=145

LODRES= 0.02

RDF#13

Cornsweet-can.rdf

Canned Sweet Corn 2001 PDP Data

20%CT

181 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=131

TOTALLOD=36

LODRES= 0.02

RDF#14

Cornsweet-frozen

Frozen Sweet Corn

2003 PDP Data

20%CT

547 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=438

TOTALLOD=109

LODRES= 0.02

CHRONIC

0.005

CHRONIC:  0.002

(0.008 FHE used)

CHRONIC:  0.002

(0.008 FHE used)

CHRONIC:  0.002

(0.008 FHE used)

Cottonseed - Undelinted

Blended – No RDF

COTTONSEED FT DATA 10%CT

0.28     0.15

0.04     0.01

0.09     0.04

0.11     0.09

0.55     0.54

0.15     0.04

0.13     0.005

0.005   0.04

0.01     0.08

0.01     0.07

0.03     0.12

0.08

Point estimate for acute assessment:  0.1161

RDF#15

Cucumber.rdf

Cucumber FT Data 2.5%CT

24 samples/24 detects

TOTALZ=936

TOTALNZ=24

0.047   0.058

0.019   0.016

0.046   0.047

0.016   0.019

0.035   0.040

0.017   0.024

0.016   0.017

0.014   0.011

0.041   0.046

0.034   0.040

0.014   0.011

0.009   0.009

RDF#17

Grapefruit.rdf

Grapefruit 2005 PDP DATA

5%CT

742 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=705

TOTALLOD=37

LODRES= 0.03

RDF#18

Grapefruitjuice.rdf

OJ 2004-05 PDP DATA 5%CT

930 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=883

TOTALLOD=47

LODRES= 0.03

CHRONIC

0.1161

CHRONIC

0.0269

CHRONIC:  0.0003

(0.008 FHE used)

CHRONIC:  0.0003

(0.008 FHE used)

RDF#16

Grapes.rdf

GRAPE FT DATA 24%CT

44 samples/44 detects

TOTALZ=294

TOTALNZ=44

0.185   0.226   0.255

0.068   0.060   0.271

0.240   0.220   0.069

0.105   0.115   0.136

0.139   0.062   0.048

0.070   0.048   0.079

0.070   0.058   0.727

0.058   0.048   0.642

0.421   0.195   0.281

0.122   0.102   0.276

0.064   0.043   0.119

0.045   0.027   0.076

0.241   0.217   0.037

0.126   0.170   0.059

0.377   0.256

HOPS

Blended – No RDF

Hops FT Data

100%CT

TOLERANCE= 20 PPM

RDF#19

Lemons and Limes

Lemon.rdf

Orange 2004-05 PDP DATA 15%CT

1483 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=1261

TOTALLOD=222

LODRES= 0.03

RDF#20

Lemon Juice and Lime Juice

Lemonjuice.rdf

OJ 2004-05 PDP DATA 15%CT

930 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=790

TOTALLOD=140

LODRES= 0.03

CHRONIC

0.1648

CHRONIC

20 ppm

CHRONIC:  0.0015

(0.008 FHE used)

CHRONIC:  0.0015

(0.008 FHE used)

RDF#22

Lettucehead.rdf

Head Lettuce 2004-05 PDP DATA

5%CT

429 samples/ 0 detects

TOTALZ=408

TOTALLOD=21

LODRES= 0.14

RDF#23

Lettuceleaf.rdf

Leaf Lettuce 2004-05 PDP Data

5%CT

678 samples/19 detects

TOTALZ=644

TOTALLOD=15

LODRes=0.14

2.8      0.68      0.56

0.41    0.39      0.38

0.37    0.31      0.30

0.29    0.28      0.20

0.20    0.18      0.16

0.11    0.068    0.05

0.05

RDF#42

Milk2.rdf

100%CT

TOTALZ=0

TOTALNZ=21

0.03994          0.03794

0.03594          0.03394

0.03194          0.02694<EMAIL_ADDRESS>  0.01894

0.01594          0.01394

0.01294<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 0.00894          0.00794

0.00594<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 0.00294

RDF#24

Mustardgreens.rdf

Mustard Greens FT Data 13%CT

30 samples/30 detects

TOTALZ=201

TOTALNZ=30

2.28    1.79     1.19

1.53    0.79     0.96

0.59    0.29     1.65

1.34    5.76     6.19

2.63    3.89     3.01

2.78    3.55     3.28

3.40    2.95     4.53

5.39    3.21     3.00

2.37    2.92     3.41

2.29    2.26     1.35

CHRONIC

0.14

CHRONIC

0.015

CHRONIC

0.05936

CHRONIC

2.686

RDF#25

oj.rdf

Orange Juice 2004-05 PDP Data

20%CT

930 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=744

TOTALLOD=186

LODRes= 0.03

	RDF#26

Orange 2004-05 PDP DATA

20%CT

1483 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=1186

TOTALLOD=297

LODRES= 0.03

	RDF#28

Peach.rdf

Peach FT Data

46%CT

68 samples/68 detects

TOTALZ=80

TOTALNZ=68

0.172     0.164     0.172

0.157     0.125     0.123

0.098     0.122     0.077

0.050     0.105     0.249

0.108     0.088     0.039

0.073     0.100     0.129

0.154     0.164     0.105

0.102     0.062     0.080

0.086     0.086     0.084

0.085     0.060     0.058

0.032     0.055     0.096

0.076     0.066     0.104

0.085     0.077     0.097

0.098     0.063     0.093

0.086     0.082     0.045

0.061     0.044     0.057

0.084     0.067     0.047

0.050     0.084     0.073

0.072     0.074     0.082

0.086     0.070     0.060

0.117     0.095     0.038

0.044     0.054     0.071

0.074     0.032

	RDF#29

Pear.rdf

Pear FT Data

66%CT

14 samples/14 detects

TOTALZ=7

TOTALNZ=14

0.043   0.032

0.021   0.016

0.013   0.023

0.053   0.031

0.016   0.015

0.023   0.015

0.016   0.023

CHRONIC:  0.003

(0.008 FHE used)

CHRONIC:  0.003

(0.008 FHE used)

CHRONIC

0.0878

CHRONIC

0.0243

Peas, Dry

Blended – No RDF

Dry Peas FT DATA

27%CT

16 samples/8 detects

8@ 0.005

0.056   0.046

0.067   0.042

0.120   0.092

0.088   0.082

Peanuts

Blended – No RDF

Peanuts FT Data

2.5%CT

22 samples/0 detects

22@ 0.0015

RDF#31

Pecans

Pecan FT Data

2.5%CT

14 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=546

TOTALNZ=14

14@ 0.005

RDF#32

Peppers.rdf

Sweet Bell Pepper 2002-04 PDP DATA 20%CT

1485 samples/1 detect

TOTALZ=1188

TOTALLOD=296

LODRES= 0.45

0.0679

ACUTE and CHRONIC:

0.0396

ACUTE and CHRONIC:

0.0015

CHRONIC:  0.005

CHRONIC:  0.045

RDF#33

Plums.rdf

Plum FT Data

41%CT

44 samples/44 detects

TOTALZ=63

TOTALNZ=44

0.053     0.051     0.076

0.072     0.020     0.031

0.024     0.030     0.017

0.024     0.005     0.0099

0.0041   0.0051   0.0027

0.0020   0.041     0.0098

0.025     0.0094   0.012

0.016     0.030     0.036

0.0072   0.0084   0.012

0.014     0.017     0.018

0.016     0.019     0.014

0.013     0.0092   0.0087

0.019     0.020     0.025

0.025     0.0043   0.0045

0.010     0.014

RDF#34

Potato.rdf

POTATO 2000-02 PDP DATA 35%CT

1472 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=957

TOTALLOD=515

LODRES= 0.03

Radish

Tolerance

100%CT

TOLERANCE= 1.0 PPM

Soybeans

Blended – No RDF

Tolerance

2.5%CT

TOLERANCE= 0.03 PPM

CHRONIC

0.0201

CHRONIC:  0.0075

(0.01  ppm tolerance used)

CHRONIC

1.0

CHRONIC

0.03

RDF#35

Pumpkin.rdf

Summer Squash FT Data 2.5%CT

20 samples/20 detects

TOTALZ=780

TOTALNZ=20

0.072   0.056

0.061   0.062

0.051   0.037

0.028   0.031

0.018   0.018

0.022   0.017

0.011   0.014

0.008   0.007

0.077   0.075

0.055   0.068

RDF#64

SpinachPDP.rdf

Leaf Lettuce 2004-05 PDP Data

46%CT

678 samples/19 detects

TOTALZ=366

TOTALLOD=293

LODRes=0.14

2.8       0.68       0.56

0.41     0.39       0.38

0.37     0.31       0.30

0.29     0.28       0.20

0.20     0.18       0.16

0.11     0.0679   0.05

0.05

RDF#37

Squash.rdf

Summer Squash FT Data  5%CT

20 samples/20 detects

TOTALZ=380

TOTALNZ=20

0.072   0.056

0.061   0.062

0.051   0.037

0.028   0.031

0.018   0.018

0.022   0.017

0.011   0.014

0.008   0.007

0.077   0.075

0.055   0.068

Sugarcane

Blended – No RDF

Sugarcane FT Data

5 %CT

Point estimate for acute assessment:  0.013

CHRONIC

0.0394

CHRONIC:  3.867

(Avg field trial value)

CHRONIC

0.0394

CHRONIC

0.013

Sunflower

Blended – No RDF

Sunflower FT Data

5%CT

2 samples/2 detects

2@ 0.01

RDF#38

Tangerine.rdf

Orange 2004-05 PDP DATA

15%CT

1483 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=1261

TOTALLOD=222

LODRES= 0.03

RDF#39

Tangerinejuice.rdf

OJ 2004-05 PDP Data

15%CT

930 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=791

TOTALLOD=139

LODRES= 0.03

RDF#40

Tomato.rdf

TOMATO 2003-04 PDP DATA 30%CT

1486 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=1040

TOTALLOD=446

LODRES= 0.04

CHRONIC

0.01

CHRONIC:  0.003

(0.008 FHE used)

CHRONIC:  0.003

(0.008 FHE used)

CHRONIC:  0.002

(0.008 FHE used)

Tomato Paste

Blended – No RDF

Tomato Paste 2001 PDP DATA 30%CT

369 samples/0 detects

LODRES= 0.0225

Point estimate for acute assessment:  0.02

RDF#39

Watermelon.rdf

Cantaloupe FT data

2.5%CT

24 samples/24 detects

TOTALZ=936

TOTALNZ=24

0.017   0.026

0.013   0.021

0.024   0.028

0.028   0.031

0.022   0.015

0.018   0.017

0.042   0.040

0.042   0.044

0.030   0.027

0.022   0.016

0.040   0.033

0.024   0.022

Wheat

Blended – No RDF

Wheat FT Data

3%CT

22 samples/22 detects

0.046   0.062   0.058

0.019   0.028   0.050

0.026   0.034   0.025

0.021   0.022   0.029

0.058   0.058   0.027

0.024   0.022   0.023

0.092   0.082   0.087

0.033   0.039   0.094

0.155   0.180   0.049

0.040   0.040   0.029

0.026   0.024   0.035

0.074   0.096   0.037

0.017   0.011

0.014   0.017

0.047   0.068

RDF#58

Spinach100.rdf

Spinach  FT Data 100%CT

24 samples/24 detects

TOTALZ=0

TOTALNZ=24

4.94   4.91

4.11   4.51

3.71   4.24

2.75   3.16

5.50   5.46

2.82   3.05

3.18   4.32

1.57   2.14

5.03   4.47

2.91   2.55

5.27   5.18

3.81   3.22

CHRONIC:  0.001125

(0.008 FHE used)

CHRONIC

0.0268

CHRONIC

0.0480

CHRONIC:  3.867

(Avg field trial value)

RDF#54

Mustardgreens100.rdf

Mustard Greens FT Data 100%CT

30 samples/30 detects

TOTALZ=0

TOTALNZ=30

2.28    1.79

1.19    1.53

0.79    0.96

0.59    0.29

1.65    1.34

5.76    6.19

2.63    3.89

3.01    2.78

3.55    3.28

3.40    2.95

4.53    5.39

3.21    3.00

2.37    2.92

3.41    2.29

2.26    1.35

RDF#44

Cattlemeat.rdf

Cattle Meat

100%CT

9 samples/9 detects

TOTALZ = 0

TOTALNZ = 9

0.034

2 @ 0.021

2 @ 0.020

2 @ 0.018

0.017

0.016

Sum of residues resulting from exposure through feed and pour-on application

RDF#46

Cattleliver.rdf

Cattle Liver

100%CT

9 samples/9 detects

TOTALZ = 0

TOTALNZ = 9

7 @ 0.013

2 @ 0.0139

Sum of residues resulting from exposure through feed and pour-on application

RDF#47

Cattlekidney.rdf

Cattle Kidney

100%CT

9 samples/9 detects

TOTALZ = 0

TOTALNZ = 9

0.035

0.029

0.025

2 @ 0.024

0.023

2 @ 0.018

0.017

Sum of residues resulting from exposure through feed and pour-on application

CHRONIC

2.686

CHRONIC

0.021

CHRONIC

0.0132

CHRONIC

0.024

RDF#45

Cattlefat.rdf

CATTLE FAT

100%CT

9 samples/9 detects

TOTALZ = 0

TOTALNZ = 9

0.827     0.757

0.738     0.697

0.697     0.691

0.674     0.673

0.659

Sum of residues resulting from exposure through feed and pour-on application

RDF#50

Broccoli100.rdf

Broccoli 2001-02 PDP DATA 100%CT

333 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=0

TOTALLOD=333

LODRES= 0.03

RDF#51

Cabbage100.rdf

Cabbage FT Data 100%CT

18 samples/18 detects

TOTALZ=0

TOTALNZ=18

0.016   0.022

0.071   0.096

0.045   0.035

0.12     0.079

1.02     0.97

1.25     1.38

1.1       1.23

0.48     0.67

0.35     0.13

RDF#52

Cantaloupe100.rdf

Cantaloupe FT Data 100%CT

24 samples/24 detects

TOTALZ=0

TOTALNZ=24

0.017   0.026     0.013

0.021   0.024     0.028

0.028   0.031     0.022

0.015   0.018     0.017

0.042   0.040     0.042

0.044   0.030     0.027

0.022   0.016     0.040

0.033   0.024     0.022

CHRONIC:  0.1296

CHRONIC:  0.03

CHRONIC:  0.504	CHRONIC:  0.02675

RDF#49

Apple100.rdf

Apple FT Data

100%CT

TOTALZ=0

TOTALNZ=28

0.013     0.014

0.029     0.020

0.016     0.036

0.019     0.058

0.012     0.011

0.016     0.011

0.024     0.022

0.020     0.017

0.0079   0.024

0.018     0.036

0.027     0.0066

0.028     0.0099

0.018     0.027

0.015     0.017

RDF#55

Oranges100.rdf

Orange 2004-05 PDP DATA

100%CT

1483 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=0

TOTALLOD=1483

LODRes= 0.03

RDF#56

Pear100.rdf

Pear FT Data

100%CT

14 samples/14 detects

TOTALZ=0

TOTALNZ=14

0.043   0.032

0.021   0.016

0.013   0.023

0.053   0.031

0.016   0.015

0.023   0.015

0.016   0.023

RDF#57

Peppers100.rdf

Sweet Bell Pepper 2002-04 PDP Data 100%CT

1485 samples/1 detect

TOTALZ=0

TOTALLOD=1484

LODRES= 0.45

0.0679

CHRONIC:  0.0204

CHRONIC:  0.03

CHRONIC:  0.0243

CHRONIC:  0.45

RDF#59

Squash100.rdf

Summer Squash FT Data 100%CT

20 samples/20 detects

TOTALZ=0

TOTALNZ=20

0.072   0.056

0.061   0.062

0.051   0.037

0.028   0.031

0.018   0.018

0.022   0.017

0.011   0.014

0.008   0.007

0.077   0.075

0.055   0.068

RDF#60

Tomato100.rdf

Tomato 2003-04 PDP Data

100%CT

1486 samples/0 detects

TOTALZ=0

TOTALLOD=1486

LODRES= 0.04

RDF#61

Cucumber100.rdf

Cucumber FT Data

100%CT

24 samples/24 detects

TOTALZ=0

TOTALNZ=24

0.047   0.058

0.019   0.016

0.046   0.047

0.016   0.019

0.035   0.040

0.017   0.024

0.016   0.017

0.014   0.011

0.041   0.046

0.034   0.040

0.014   0.011

0.009   0.009

RDF#53

HeadLet100

Lettuce 2004-05 PDP Data 100%CT

429 samples/ 0 detects

TOTALZ=0

TOTALLOD=429

LODRES= 0.14

CHRONIC:  0.0394

CHRONIC:  0.04

CHRONIC:  0.0269

CHRONIC:  0.14

RDF#30

PeaSucc.rdf

Pea Tolerance

27%CT

TOTALZ=73

TOTALNZ=27

27 @ 0.25

RDF#21

Lemonpeel.rdf

Lemon FT Data

15%CT

TOTALZ=45

TOTALNZ=8

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.08

0.08

0.05

0.02

0.005

RDF#27

Orangepeel.rdf

Orange FT Data

20%CT

TOTALZ=48

TOTALNZ=12

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.04

0.04

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.02

0.02

0.005

RDF#41

Tomatocan.rdf

Canned Tomatoes

2000 PDP Data

30%CT

TOTALZ=114

TOTALLOD=49

LODRes=0.03

CHRONIC:  0.25

CHRONIC:  0.067

CHRONIC:  0.035

CHRONIC:  0.0015

(0.008 FHE used)

RDF#62

Kale.rdf

Mustard Greens FT Data

18%CT

TOTALZ=137

TOTALNZ=30

2.28    1.79     1.19

1.53    0.79     0.96

0.59    0.29     1.65

1.34    5.76     6.19

2.63    3.89     3.01

2.78    3.55     3.28

3.40    2.95     4.53

5.39    3.21     3.00

2.37    2.92     3.41

2.29    2.26     1.35

RDF#63

Turnipgreens.rdf

Mustard Greens FT Data

21%CT

TOTALZ=113

TOTALNZ=30

2.28    1.79     1.19

1.53    0.79     0.96

0.59    0.29     1.65

1.34    5.76     6.19

2.63    3.89     3.01

2.78    3.55     3.28

3.40    2.95     4.53

5.39    3.21     3.00

2.37    2.92     3.41

2.29    2.26     1.35

RDF#64

SpinachPDP.rdf

Leaf Lettuce 2004-05 PDP Data

46%CT

678 Samples/19 detects

TOTALZ=366

TOTALLOD=293

LODRes=0.14

2.8      0.68      0.56

0.41    0.39      0.38

0.37    0.31      0.30

0.29    0.28      0.20

0.20    0.18      0.16

0.11    0.068    0.05

0.05

Sugar Beet Roots

Blended – no RDF

Sugar beet root FT data

100%CT

11  HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS>  @ 0.003

4 @ 0.009

3 @ 0.004

0.088

0.025

0.013

0.010

0.006

0.005

Point estimate for acute assessment:  0.0105

CHRONIC:  2.686

CHRONIC:  2.686

CHRONIC:  0.0621

CHRONIC:  0.0105

Attachment 8: Percent Crop Treated and Projected Percent Crop Treated Memos from BEAD

Explanation of the Source Data for this Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA)

Chemical Name:  Cyfluthrin

(Chemical Number:  128831)

Date:  June 18, 2007

What is a Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA)?

Available estimates of pesticide usage data for a particular active ingredient that is used on agricultural crops in the United States.

What does it contain?

Pesticide usage data for a single active ingredient only.

Agricultural use sites (crops) that the pesticide is reported to be used on.

Available pesticide usage information (i.e., does not include all of the United States).

Annual percent of crop treated (average & maximum) for each agricultural crop.

Average annual pounds of the pesticide applied for each agricultural crop (i.e., for the states surveyed, not for the entire United States).

What assumptions can I make about the reported data?

Average pounds of active ingredient applied - Values are calculated by merging pesticide usage data sources together; averaging by year, averaging across all years, & then rounding.  Note:  If the estimated value is less than 500, then that value is labeled <500.  Estimated values between 500 & <1,000,000 are rounded to 1 significant digit.  Estimated values of 1,000,000 or greater are rounded to 2 significant digits.)

Average percent of crop treated - Values are calculated by merging data sources together; averaging by year, averaging across all years, & rounding to the nearest multiple of 5.  Note:  If the estimated value is less than 1, then the value is labeled <1.

Maximum percent of crop treated - Value is the single maximum value reported across all data sources, across all years, & rounded up to the nearest multiple of 5.  Note:  If the estimated value is less than 2.5, then the value is labeled <2.5.

What are the data sources used?

USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture’s National Agricultural Statistics Service) – pesticide usage data from 2000 to 2005.

Private Pesticide Market Research – pesticide usage data from 2000 to 2005.

NPUD 2002 (National Pesticide Use Database) of the CropLife Foundation; Used only if data are not available from the other sources.

California DPR data can be requested separately.

What are the data limitations?

Additional registered uses may exist but are not included because either the available surveys do not report usage (e.g., small acreage crops) or these uses are not covered in the available surveys.

Lack of reported usage data for the pesticide on a crop does not imply zero usage.

Usage data on a particular site may be noted in data sources, but not quantified.  In these instances, the site would not be reported in the SLUA.

Non-agricultural use sites (e.g., turf, post-harvest, mosquito control, etc.) are not reported in the SLUA.  A separate request must be made to receive these estimates.

Some sites show some use, even though they are not on the label.  This usage could be due to Section 18 requests, existing stocks of the chemical, data collection errors, experimental use permit (EUP), and/or because of an illegal use.

Who do I contact for further information and/or questions on this SLUA?

Analyst:  Alan Halvorson (Phone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>)

Reviewer:  Jihad Alsadek (Phone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>)

                  Screening Level Estimates of Agricultural Uses of Cyfluthrin (128831)

                                         Sorted Alphabetically

	  	 			Pounds of	Percent      Maximum

	  	 			Active	of Crop     Percent of

	OBS	Crop			Ingredient	Treated    Crop Treated

	1 	Alfalfa		10,000	<1             5

	2 	Almonds *		<500

	3 	Beans, Green	<500		<1           <2.5

	4 	Broccoli		<500		<1           <2.5

	5 	Cabbage		<500		5              5

	6 	Cantaloupes		<500		<1           <2.5

	7 	Carrots		<500		5              5

	8 	Cauliflower		<500		5              5

	9 	Corn			30,000	5             10

	10	Cotton		70,000	10            10

	11	Cucumbers		<500		<1           <2.5

	12	Grapefruit		<500		<1             5

	13	Lemons/Limes	1,000		5             15

	14	Lettuce		1,000		5              5

	15	Onions **		<500		<1           <2.5

	16	Oranges		5,000		10            20

	17	Peanuts		<500		<1           <2.5

	18	Pecans		<500		<1           <2.5

	19	Peppers		1,000		10            20

	20	Potatoes		10,000	25            35

	21	Pumpkins		<500		<1           <2.5

	22	Rice ***		<500		<1           <2.5

	23	Sod ( NPUD '02 )	<500		5

	24	Sorghum		2,000		<1           <2.5

	25	Soybeans		5,000		<1           <2.5

	26	Squash		<500		5              5

	27	Sugarcane		1,000		<1             5

	28	Sunflowers		1,000		<1             5

	29	Sweet Corn		4,000		10            20

	30	Tangerines		<500		10            15

	31	Tobacco		<500		<1           <2.5

	32	Tomatoes		2,000		5             30

	33	Watermelons		<500		<1           <2.5

_____________________________________

All numbers rounded.

'<500' indicates less than 500 pounds of active ingredient.

'<2.5' indicates less than 2.5 percent of crop is treated.

'<1'	indicates less than 1	percent of crop is treated.

*  CA data only, but 95% or more of U.S. acres are in California

** The small usage shown on onions may be due to data collection errors, illegal use, etc.  OPPIN showed no previous or current registrations on onions or bulb crops, and the BEAD Section 18 database showed no previous or current Section 18 usage on onions or bulb crops.

*** The small usage shown on rice occurred although OPPIN showed no current registrations on rice.  However, OPPIN indicated that there was a Section 3 registration for foliar applications on rice (but which was canceled in February 2006).

SLUA data sources include:

	USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture's

	           National Agricultural Statistics Service),

	Private Pesticide Market Research,

	NPUD 2002 (National Pesticide Use Database)

	          of the CropLife America Foundation, and

	California DPR data.

These results reflect amalgamated data developed by the Agency,

and are releasable to the public.  Data years are 2000 through 2005.

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:	Projected Percent Crop Treated for Pyrethroid Insecticide Cyfluthrin (PC 118831) on Requested Crops (BEAN DP 341437)

FROM:	Alan Halvorson, Economist

			Economic Analysis Branch

			Biological and Economic Analysis Division (7503P)

			Dave Brassard, Sr. Entomologist

			Biological Analysis Branch

			Biological and Economic Analysis Division (7503P)

TO:			Doug Dotson, Chemist

			Registration Action Branch 2

			Health Effects Division (7509P)

PRP Date:  August 8, 2007

I.	SUMMARY

	This memorandum provides projected percent crop treated (PPCT) estimates for pyrethroid insecticide cyfluthrin on requested crops (apples, cabbage, cauliflower, collards, grapes, kale, mustard greens, pasture/rangeland, peaches, pears, peas, plums, spinach, turnip greens, and wheat).  (See Table 1.)  The general methodology used to produce these estimates is described in the recommended Federal Register (FR) language, and an analysis of biological information verifies and/or refines the projections.  After taking account of biological information, BEAD has determined that there are no factors that indicate that the actual percent crops treated (PCTs) for cyfluthrin on these several crops in the next five years will exceed the corresponding estimated PPCTs presented in Table 1.

II.	SPECIFIC PPCT REQUEST

	The Health Effects Division (HED) requested that BEAD provide percent crop treated (PCT) estimates and/or projected percent crop treated (PPCT) estimates for cyfluthrin on several crops which were newly registered in or around 2005, namely, apples, cabbage, cauliflower, collards, grapes, kale, mustard greens, pasture/rangeland, peaches, pears, peas, plums, spinach, turnip greens, and wheat, for use in both chronic and acute dietary risk assessments.  Although data for 2006 were available for most of the crops, including apples, cabbage, cauliflower, grapes, pasture/rangeland, peaches, pears, peas, plums, spinach, and wheat, market potential for these crops may not have been fully realized by 2006.  In fact, data for 2006 show PCTs of 5% or less for cabbage, cauliflower, and spinach, and PCTs of zero to less than one percent for each of the other crops covered.  (Data for 2006 were not available for collards, kale, mustard greens, and turnip greens.)  Therefore, to provide risk-conservative estimates for all requested crops, PPCTs are estimated for all requested crops including those with data for 2006.  This memo also provides corresponding FR language.

III.	FR LANGUAGE FOR PROJECTED PERCENT CROP TREATED

EPA estimates an upper bound of projected percent crop treated (PPCT) for a new pesticide use by assuming that the percent crop treated (PCT) during the pesticide’s initial five years of use on a specific crop will not exceed the average PCT of the dominant pesticide (i.e., the one with the greatest PCT) on that crop over the three most recent surveys.  EPA calls this the market leader PPCT estimate.  The average market leader PCTs may be based on one or two survey years if three are not available.  Also, with limited availability of data, the average market leader PCTs may be based on a cross-section of state PCTs.  Comparisons are only made initially among pesticides of the same pesticide type (e.g., leading insecticides on the crop compared with the new insecticide), or, for more refined estimates, comparisons may be made among pesticides in a subcategory of the same pesticide type (e.g., leading pyrethroid insecticides compared with the new pyrethroid insecticide).  The PCTs included in the average may be each for the same pesticide or for different pesticides since the same or different pesticides may dominate each year selected.  Typically, EPA uses U.S. Department of Agriculture/National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA/NASS) as the source for raw PCT data because it is publicly available. When a specific crop is not surveyed by USDA/NASS, EPA uses other sources including proprietary data and calculates the estimated PCT.

  An estimated PPCT, based on the average PCT of the market leaders, is appropriate for use in chronic dietary risk assessment.  This method of estimating PPCT for a new use of a registered pesticide or a new pesticide produces high-end estimate that is unlikely, in most cases, to be exceeded during the initial five years of actual use.  Predominant factors that bear on whether the PPCT could be exceeded may include PCTs of similar chemistries, pests controlled by alternatives, pest prevalence in the market and other factors.  All relevant information currently available for predominant factors has been considered for the use of cyfluthrin on apples, cabbage, cauliflower, collards, grapes, kale, mustard greens, pasture/rangeland, peaches, pears, peas, plums, spinach, turnip greens, and wheat.  It is the opinion of BEAD that it is unlikely that actual PCTs for cyfluthrin will exceed the corresponding estimated PPCTs during the next five years because cyfluthrin shares many pest control attributes and constraints with other members of the pyrethroid class and will likely replace or be used in a similar manner to currently registered pyrethroids.

IV.	PROJECTIONS BASED ON MARKET LEADER APPROACH

The PPCTs for requested uses of cyfluthrin were determined using the market leader approach for apples, cabbage (combining fresh and processing estimates), cauliflower, collards, grapes, kale, mustard greens, pasture/rangeland, peaches, pears, green peas (based on processing peas), plums, spinach (combining fresh and processing estimates), turnip greens and wheat (combining durum, other Spring and Winter estimates) for both chronic and acute risk assessments.  For collards, kale and mustard greens, the PCTs of market leaders were averaged over states with highest market leaders rather than over years because only one year of data was available.  For collards, kale, mustard greens and spinach, the estimated PPCTs were based on market leaders among pyrethroid insecticides only in order to present more refined estimates for these crops.  This was justified because a new pyrethoid insecticide or a new pyrethoid use will generally compete with, or be used in a similar manner to, other pyrethroid insecticides.  See “V. Additional Biological Factors” for more information.    See Table 1 for these projections, as well as further information on methodology and data sources.

Table 1

Cyfluthrin Projected Percent Crop Treated (PPCT) on Requested Crops

Crop	Leading Insecticide(s)	Year	PCT

Apples	Azinphos-methyl	2001	72%

	Azinphos-methyl	2003	73%

	Azinphos-methyl	2005	63%

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	69%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	73%

Cabbage, fresh	Bt	2000	60%

	Bt	2002	52%

	Bt, spinosad	2004	42%

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	51%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	60%

Cabbage, processing 	Lambda-cyhalothrin	1996	62%

	Lambda-cyhalothrin	1998	80%

	Permethrin	2000	63%

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	68%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	80%

Cabbage, total (***)	Weighted average for chronic risk	Projected	52%

	Weighted maximum for acute risk	Projected	62%

Cauliflower	Spinosad	2000	67%

	Indoxacarb	2002	41%

	Spinosad	2004	46%

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	51%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	67%

Collards (**)	Cypermethrin in GA	2000	11%

	Permethrin in NC	2000	11%

	Esfenvalerate in SC	2000	45%

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	22%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	45%

Grapes	Imidacloprid	2001	24%

	Imidacloprid	2003	13%

	Fenpropathrin, imidacloprid	2005	8%

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	15%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	24%

Kale (**)	Cypermethrin in 4 states surveyed	2000	13%

	Cypermethrin in GA	2000	18%

	Average in 4 states for chronic risk	Projected	13%

	Maximum (in GA) for acute risk	Projected	18%

Mustard greens (**)	Esfenvalerate in GA	2000	8%

	Permethrin in NC	2000	1%

	Permethrin in TX	2000	13%

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	7%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	13%

Pasture/

Rangeland	All insecticides together	1998	<1%

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	<1%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	1%

Peaches	Phosmet	2001	45%

	Esfenvalerate	2003	39%

	Phosmet	2005	46%

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	43%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	46%

Pears	Abamectin	2001	60%

	Abamectin	2003	59%

	Abamectin	2005	66%

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	62%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	66%

Peas, green, processing	Bifenthrin	2000	23%

	Zeta-cypermethrin	2002	27%

	Dimethoate	2004	14%

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	21%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	27%

Plums	Esfenvalerate	2001	41%

	Phosmet	2003	28%

	Esfenvalerate	2005	43%

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	37%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	41%

Spinach, fresh (**)	Permethrin	2002	34%

	Permethrin	2004	33%

	Permethrin	2006	46%

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	38%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	46%

Spinach, processing (**)	Permethrin	1996	43%

	Permethrin	1998	49%

	Permethrin	2000	39%

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	44%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	49%

Spinach, total (***)	Weighted average for chronic risk	Projected	39%

	Weighted maximum for acute risk	Projected	46%

Turnip greens (**)	Permethrin in GA	2000	21%

	Permethrin in NC	2000	1%

	Permethrin in TX	2000	20%

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	14%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	21%

Wheat, durum	All insecticides together	1991	6%

	Any insecticide	2004	<2%(*)

	Any insecticide	2006	<1%(*)

	Average for chronic risk	Projected	3%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	6%

Wheat, other Spring	Dimethoate, methyl parathion	1998	2%

	Chlorpyrifos, dimethoate, zeta-cypermethrin	2004	<0.5%

	Dimethoate, lambda-cyhalothrin	2006	<0.5%

	Average for chronic risk 	Projected	1%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	2%

Wheat, Winter	Zeta-cypermethrin	2002	4%

	Chlorpyrifos	2004	3%

	Chlorpyrifos	2006	2%

	Average for chronic risk 	Projected	3%

	Maximum for acute risk	Projected	4%

Wheat, total (***)	Weighted average for chronic risk 	Projected	2%

	Weighted maximum for acute risk	Projected	3%

(*) PCT of any insecticide on durum wheat estimated to be less than smallest herbicide PCT given.  USDA indicated that there were not enough reports to estimate any individual insecticide.

(**) To refine the PPCT estimates for leafy greens, leading insecticides were selected from pyrethroids only.

(***) PPCTs for total cabbage, total spinach and total wheat are weighted averages of corresponding component PPCTs, where weights are the corresponding planted acres surveyed

Note 1:  The listing of more than one insecticide for a given year means that each was among the leading insecticides with approximately the same PCT.

Note 2:  Estimated PPCTs are 3-year averages of given historical PCT data when available.  Estimated PPCTs for collards, kale, mustard greens and turnip greens are averaged over states because of deficient years of data.

Sources –

USDA/NASS, Agricultural Chemical Usage, Field Crops Summaries, data for 1991, 1998, 2002, 2004 and 2006

USDA/NASS, Agricultural Chemical Usage, Fruit Summaries, data for 2001, 2003 and 2005

USDA/NASS, Agricultural Chemical Usage, Vegetables Summaries, data for 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004 and 2006

V.	ADDITIONAL BIOLOGICAL FACTORS

	Cyfluthrin, a pyrethroid insecticide, shares many of the pest control attributes and constraints exhibited by other members of the pyrethroid class (e.g., bifenthrin, cypermethrin, lambda cyhalothrin, esfenvalerate, fenpropathrin, permethrin, and zeta- cypermethrin).  All of these pyrethroids, possess a broad spectrum of pest control, good residual activity, are relatively inexpensive, and are highly toxic to non-target beneficial insects (i.e. parasitic and predacious insects important for biological pest control).  Because of the latter constraint, pyrethroids tend to be applied later in the growing season when disruption of beneficial insect populations has fewer adverse consequences (than in the early season).   Pesticides from other classes have either a narrower spectrum of insect control, and/or are not as disruptive to beneficial insect populations. BEAD believes that, because cyfluthrin shares many pest control attributes and constraints with other members of the pyrethroid class, it will likely replace or be used in a similar manner to currently registered pyrethroids.  For collards, kale, mustard greens, and spinach, the estimated PPCTs were based on market leaders among pyrethroid insecticides in order to present more refined estimates for these crops.  Because only one year of data was available for collards, kale, and mustard greens, their estimated PPCTs were derived from data over states rather than over years, using the three states, if available, with the largest pyrethroid PCTs.  This is more risk-conservative than using PCT data from all states.  For all crops except collards, kale, mustard greens, and spinach, the estimated PPCTs were the initial estimates based on market leaders among all insecticides (including pyrethroids).  For these crops for all years covered, the PCTs of market leaders among all insecticides were either the same as or greater than the corresponding PCTs of market leaders among pyrethroid insecticides only.  Therefore, it follows that the estimated PPCTs for these crops based on all insecticides are more conservative with respect to risk than corresponding estimated PPCTs had they been based on pyrethroids only.  That is, the estimated PPCTs are the same as or greater than if otherwise estimated using pyrethroids only.

VI. 	CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS

BEAD recommends that the given PPCTs in Table 1 be used in the chronic and acute dietary risk assessments for cyfluthrin.  BEAD has considered all information currently available and believes it is unlikely that the above PPCTs will be exceeded during the next five years.

Cyfluthrin	Dietary Exposure Assessment	DP Barcode:	D339414

PC Code: 128		Page   PAGE  1  of   NUMPAGES  73

Page   PAGE  73  of   NUMPAGES  73


[Federal Register: March 23, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 55)]
[Notices]
[Page 13773-13774]
[DOCID:fr23mr10-83]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2009-0001]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request, OMB No. 1660-NEW; FEMA Preparedness Grants:
Operation Stonegarden (OPSG)

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice; 30-day notice and request for comments; new information
collection; OMB No. 1660-NEW; FEMA Form 089-16, OPSG Operations Order
Report; FEMA Form 089-20, Operations Order Prioritization.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has submitted
the information collection abstracted below to the Office of Management
and Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The submission describes the
nature of the information collection, the categories of respondents,
the estimated burden (i.e., the time, effort and resources used by
respondents to respond) and cost, and the actual data collection
instruments FEMA will use.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before April 22, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the proposed information
collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the Desk
Officer for the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection should be made to Director, Office
of Records Management, 1800 South Bell Street, Arlington, VA 20598-
3005, facsimile number<PHONE_NUMBER>, or e-mail address FEMA-
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Collection of Information

    Title: FEMA Preparedness Grants: Operation Stonegarden (OPSG).
    Type of information collection: New information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-NEW.
    Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA Form 089-16, OPSG Operations Order
Report; FEMA Form 089-20, Operations Order Prioritization. The form
titles have changed since publication of the 60-day Federal Register
Notice at 74 FR 59210, Nov. 17, 2009.
    Abstract: The Operation Stonegarden grant is an important tool
among a comprehensive set of measures to help strengthen the Nation
against risks associated with potential terrorist attacks. FEMA uses
the information to evaluate applicants' familiarity with the national
preparedness architecture and identify how elements of this
architecture have been incorporated into regional/State/local planning,
operations, and investments. The grant provides funding to designated
localities to enhance cooperation and coordination between Federal,
State, local, and Tribal law enforcement agencies in a joint mission to
secure the U.S. borders along routes of ingress from International
borders to include travel corridors in States bordering Mexico and
Canada, as well as States and

territories with international water borders.
    Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 39.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Average Hour Burden per Respondent: 642 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 25,038 hours.
    Estimated Cost: There is no annual reporting or recordkeeping costs
associated with this collection.

    Dated: March 16, 2010.
Larry Gray,
Director, Records Management Division, Mission Support Bureau, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2010-6353 Filed 3-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-78-P