[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 140 (Friday, July 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 42718]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17656]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Staff Attendance at Southwest Power Pool Regional
Entity Trustee, Regional State Committee and Board of Directors
Meetings

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that
members of its staff may attend the meetings of the Southwest Power
Pool, Inc. (SPP) Regional Entity Trustee (RE), Regional State Committee
(RSC) and Board of Directors, as noted below. Their attendance is part
of the Commission's ongoing outreach efforts.
    All meetings will be held at the Marriott Country Club Plaza, 4445
Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111. The hotel phone number is (800)
810-3708.

SPP RE

July, 30, 2012 (8:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.)

SPP RSC

July 30, 2012 (1:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m.)

SPP Board of Directors

July 31, 2012 (8:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m.)

    The discussions may address matters at issue in the following
proceedings:

Docket No. ER06-451, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER08-1419, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-659, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-748, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-1050, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-1192, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-4105, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-140, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-430, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-550, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-891, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-909, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-959, Southwester Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1017, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1018, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1179, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1401, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1402, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1586, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1772, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1779, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1849, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1854, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1974, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-2054, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-2064, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-2090, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-2091, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. EL12-2, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. EL12-47, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. EL12-51, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. EL12-60, Southwest Power Pool, Inc., et al.
Docket No. ER12-1813, The Empire District Electric Co.
Docket No. ER12-1071, Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Docket No. EL12-59, Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-548, ITC Great Plains, LLC
Docket No. ER12-1826, Kansas City Power & Light Co.
Docket No. ER12-1828, KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Co.
Docket No. ER11-3728, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER12-480, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1577, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. EL11-34, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER09-36, Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC
Docket No. ER12-1537, Public Service Co. of Oklahoma
Docket No. ER12-1538, Southwestern Electric Power Co.
Docket No. ER12-1970, Southwestern Electric Power Co.
Docket No. ER09-35, Tallgrass Transmission, LLC
Docket No. EL12-28, Xcel Energy Services Inc., et al.
    These meetings are open to the public.
    For more information, contact Patrick Clarey, Office of Energy
Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (317) 249-
5937 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: July 12, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-17656 Filed 7-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71029]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22537]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2023-0012]

Federal Advisory Council on Occupational Safety and Health
(FACOSH); Notice of Rechartering

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice of rechartering of the Federal Advisory Council on
Occupational Safety and Health (FACOSH).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
hereby announces that the FACOSH charter will be renewed for a two-year
period pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) and in
accordance with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services
Administration.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Press inquiries: Mr. Frank Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office of
Communications; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].
    General information: Ms. Mikki Holmes, Director, OSHA Office of
Federal Agency Programs; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].
    Copies of this Federal Register document: Electronic copies of this
Federal Register document are available at http://www.regulations.gov.
This document, as well as news releases and other relevant information
are also available on the OSHA web page at http://www.osha.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 29, 2023, President Joseph
Biden signed Executive Order (E.O.) 14109 continuing certain federal
advisory committees, including FACOSH, until September 30, 2025 (88 FR
68447 (October 04, 2023)). In response, the Secretary approved the
renewal of the FACOSH charter. The Department of Labor (DOL) will file
the renewed FACOSH charter before the current FACOSH Charter expires on
October 14, 2023. FACOSH will terminate on September 30, 2025, unless
continued by the President. The FACOSH charter is available to read or
download at http://www.osha.gov.

Authority and Signature

    James S. Frederick, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this notice
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7902; 5 U.S.C. App. 2; 29 U.S.C. 668; E.O. 12196
(45 FR 12629 (2/27/1980)), as amended; 41 CFR part 102-3; and Secretary
of Labor's Order 08-2020 (85 FR 58393).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on October 5, 2023.
James S. Frederick,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2023-22537 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 171 (Thursday, September 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 53314]
[FR Doc No: 2015-21884]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4235-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2015-0002]

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands; Amendment No. 1 to
Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (FEMA-4235-DR),
dated August 5, 2015, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: August 18, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands is hereby amended
to include additional categories of work under the Public Assistance
program for those areas determined to have been adversely affected by
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration
of August 5, 2015.

    The island of Saipan for Public Assistance [Categories C-G]
(already designated for Individual Assistance and debris removal and
emergency protective measures [Categories A and B], including direct
federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program).
    The island of Tinian for Public Assistance [Categories C-G]
(already designated for debris removal and emergency protective
measures [Categories A and B], including direct federal assistance,
under the Public Assistance program).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2015-21884 Filed 9-2-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 233 (Thursday, December 3, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77999-78002]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26014]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0461; FRL-10016-23]

Sethoxydim; Pesticide Tolerances

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of
sethoxydim in or on basil, dried leaves and basil, fresh leaves.
Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) requested these
tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).

DATES: This regulation is effective December 3, 2020. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before February 1, 2021,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0461, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).

     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Publishing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0461 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
February 1, 2021. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0461, by one of
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance

    In the Federal Register of October 3, 2019 (84 FR 52850) (FRL-9999-
89), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
9E8769) by IR-4, IR-4 Project Headquarters, Rutgers, The State
University of New Jersey, 500 College Road East, Suite 201 W,
Princeton, NJ 08540. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.412 be
amended by establishing tolerances for residues of the herbicide
sethoxydim, including its metabolites and degradates, determined by
measuring only the sum of sethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-
(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one (CAS Reg. No. 74051-80-
2) and its metabolites containing the 2-cyclohexen-1-one moiety,
calculated as the stoichiometric equivalent of sethoxydim, in or on
basil, dried leaves at 20 parts per million (ppm) and basil, fresh
leaves at 8 ppm. That document referenced a summary of the petition
prepared by IR-4, the petitioner, which is available in the docket for
this action, docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0461, at http://www.regulations.gov. No relevant comments were received in response to
the notice of filing.

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

A. Statutory Background

    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but it does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of
sethoxydim and to make a determination on aggregate exposure for
sethoxydim, including exposure resulting from the tolerances
established by this action. EPA's assessment of exposures and risks
associated with sethoxydim follows.

B. Sethoxydim Aggregate Risk Assessment

    On June 15, 2015, EPA published in the Federal Register a final
rule establishing tolerances for residues of sethoxydim in or on
multiple commodities based on the Agency's conclusion that aggregate
exposure to sethoxydim is safe for the general population, including
infants and children. See 80 FR 34070 (FRL-9928-20) (Docket ID EPA-HQ-
OPP-2014-0161). In an effort to streamline Federal Register
publications, EPA is not reprinting here summaries of its analysis that
have previously appeared in the Federal Register in tolerance
rulemakings for the same pesticide. To that end, this rulemaking refers
the reader to the following sections from the June 15, 2015 tolerance
rulemaking for sethoxydim that remain unchanged for an understanding of
the Agency's rationale in support of this rulemaking: Units III.A
(Toxicological Profile); III.B. (Toxicological Points of Departure/
Levels of Concern); III.C. (Exposure Assessment), except as explained
in the next paragraphs; III.D. (Safety Factor for Infants and
Children); and IV.A (Analytical Enforcement Method).
    1. Updates to exposure assessment. EPA's dietary (food and drinking
water) exposure assessments have been updated to include the additional
exposure from the new use of sethoxydim on basil. In addition, the
acute dietary exposure assessment was revised to: (1) Assume 100% crop
treated, instead of using percent crop treated as described in the 2015
rule; and (2) incorporate empirical and/or EPA's 2018 default
processing factors. The assumption of tolerance-level residues for both
the acute and chronic dietary analyses has not changed. For the chronic
dietary exposure assessment, EPA incorporated updated average crop
treated estimates for select commodities and EPA's 2018 processing
factors.
    The new use on basil does not impact drinking water exposures;
therefore, the Agency relied on the same values for drinking water
exposures as expressed in the June 2015 rulemaking.
    While EPA has updated the human equivalent doses for assessing

inhalation risk to residential handlers, this revision does not impact
the approach of the aggregate assessment. The scenario and life stage
resulting in the highest residential exposures for use in the aggregate
assessment and which is considered protective of other exposure
scenarios continues to be the post-application incidental oral hand-to-
mouth exposure of children (1 to less than 2 years old) on treated
turf. The new use on basil does not result in any additional
residential exposures.
    2. Assessment of aggregate risks. EPA determines whether acute and
chronic dietary pesticide exposures are safe by comparing aggregate
exposure estimates to the acute population adjusted dose and chronic
population adjusted dose. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term risks
are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water, and
residential exposure to the appropriate points of departure to ensure
that an adequate margin of exposure (MOE) exists. For linear cancer
risks, EPA calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer
given the estimated aggregate exposure.
    Acute dietary (food and drinking water) risks are below the
Agency's level of concern of 100% of the acute population adjusted dose
(aPAD): They are less than 12% of the aPAD for children 1 to 2 years
old, the population subgroup with the highest exposure estimate.
Chronic dietary risks are below the Agency's level of concern of 100%
of the chronic population adjusted dose (cPAD): They are 24% of the
cPAD for children 1 to 2 years old, the population subgroup with the
highest exposure estimate.
    For the aggregate risk assessment, exposures to sethoxydim in food
and drinking water are combined with residential exposures for the
relevant exposure duration period. Aggregate acute and chronic risk are
equivalent to the dietary risks, which are below EPA's level of
concern, because neither acute nor long-term residential exposures are
expected.
    The short-term aggregate risk assessment considers only residential
incidental oral exposures and combines chronic (background) exposures
with the expected short-term post-application exposures to children 1
to 2 years old. This yields an MOE of 4,400, which is not of concern
because it exceeds EPA's level of concern (MOEs less than or equal to
100). Intermediate-term residential exposures are not expected.
    Finally, as stated in the June 2015 rulemaking, sethoxydim is not
expected to pose a cancer risk to humans.

C. Determination of Safety

    Therefore, based on the risk assessments and information described
and referenced above, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the general population, or to
infants and children, from aggregate exposure to sethoxydim residues.
More detailed information about the Agency's analysis can be found in
``Sethoxydim: Human Health Risk Assessment to Support the Section 3 Use
on Basil and a Label Amendment to Reduce the Pre-harvest Interval for
Caneberry Subgroup 13-07A'' dated October 21, 2020 in docket ID number
EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0461.

IV. International Residue Limits

    In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4).
    The Codex has not established a MRL for sethoxydim.

V. Conclusion

    Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of sethoxydim,
including its metabolites and degradates, determined by measuring only
the sum of the herbicide 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-
(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one (CAS Reg. No. 74051-80-
2) and its metabolites containing the 2-cyclohexen-1-one moiety,
calculated as the stoichiometric equivalent of sethoxydim, in or on
basil, dried leaves at 20 ppm and basil, fresh leaves at 8 ppm.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3,
2017). This action does not contain any information collections subject
to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerances in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

VII. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller

General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the
Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: November 5, 2020.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending
40 CFR chapter I as follows:

PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. In Sec.  180.412, amend paragraph (a) by designating the table and
adding in alphabetical order in newly designated Table 1 to paragraph
(a) the entries ``Basil, dried leaves'' and ``Basil, fresh leaves'' to
read as follows:

Sec.  180.412  Sethoxydim; tolerances for residues.

    (a) * * *

                        Table 1 to Paragraph (a)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Parts per
                          Commodity                             million
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                * * * * *
Basil, dried leaves.........................................          20
Basil, fresh leaves.........................................           8

                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-26014 Filed 12-2-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 43 (Monday, March 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13427-13431]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04681]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-91241; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2021-010]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Enhance the End of Day Summary Message on Nasdaq Last Sale Plus

March 2, 2021.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 17, 2021, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to enhance the End of Day (``EOD'') summary
message on Nasdaq Last Sale (``NLS'') Plus by replacing the current
high, low and closing price of a security based on its trading on the
Nasdaq, Nasdaq BX and Nasdaq PSX exchanges with the high, low and
closing price of a security published by the securities information
processors (``SIPs''), and adding the opening price of a security as
published by the SIPs to that message
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to enhance the EOD summary message on NLS
Plus by replacing the current high, low and closing price of a security
based on its trading on the Nasdaq, Nasdaq BX and Nasdaq PSX exchanges
with the consolidated high, low and closing price as published by the
SIPs, and adding the opening price of a security published by the SIPs
to that message.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The securities information processors issue consolidated
trade information pursuant to the UTP Plan and the CTA/CQ Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This Proposal is in response to requests by firms using NLS Plus
for a broader benchmark against which to compare trades on the Nasdaq
exchanges. Specifically, approximately 30 firms have requested that
Nasdaq distribute benchmark prices on NLS Plus to provide retail
investors and the general investing public with a static benchmark
against which to compare the price movements shown on NLS Plus using
standard high, low, opening and closing prices for U.S. markets as a
whole. In response to that feedback, and also partly in response to
recent changes by competitor exchanges to their end of day messages,\4\
Nasdaq proposes to enhance its EOD message for NLS Plus--which
currently provides the high, low and closing price of a security based
on its trading on Nasdaq affiliates--with a new EOD message that
provides the high, low and closing price published by the SIPs, and add
a new field with the opening price of a security as published by the
SIPs.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89083 (June 17,
2020), 85 FR 37706 (June 23, 2020) (SR-CboeEDGX-2020-029) (amending
the content of the Cboe One Feed to identify the primary listing
market's official opening and closing price); NYSE Best Quote and
Trades Client Specification (March 30, 2020) (updated on January 31,
2020, to publish the listing market official opening and closing
price in the Consolidated Stock Summary Messages) available at
https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/data/NYSE_BQT_Client_Specification_v2.3a.pdf.
    \5\ The Proposal also clarifies the description of the
information provided in NLS Plus. It removes an unnecessary sentence
at the end of the description of NLS Plus stating that volume
information reflects trading activity in Tape A and B Securities,
and replaces it with an earlier reference to Tape A and B securities
that provides the same information. It also separates the
description of the end of day trade summary into two sentences for
greater clarity: the first sentence lists the data provided by the
Nasdaq equity exchanges, and the second sentence identifies the
consolidated information obtained from Tapes A, B and C. The phrases
``as well as consolidated volume of,'' and ``Cumulative Consolidated
Market Volume'' are deleted to remove repetitive language that might
cause confusion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes that this change become operative on April
12, 2021, to allow time to conduct customer testing in advance of the
date of launch.
    To ensure consistency across Nasdaq platforms, the Nasdaq BX and
Nasdaq PSX exchanges will be filing companion proposals to reflect
these changes in their respective rulebooks.
Nasdaq Last Sale Plus
    NLS Plus is a comprehensive data feed that offers retail investors,
the general investing public, and other customers access to the last
sale products offered by Nasdaq,\6\ Nasdaq BX and Nasdaq PSX, and the
consolidated volume information published on the SIPs for Tapes A, B,
and C, in a convenient format that includes both real-time and end of
day information.\7\ It is, in essence, a market data vendor product
that consolidates information from multiple Nasdaq exchanges and the
SIPs. This product directly competes against similar products offered
by other exchanges, and faces potential competition from data vendors,
which can obtain and distribute SIP data on the same terms as
Nasdaq.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Nasdaq Last Sale is comprised of two proprietary data feeds
containing real-time last sale information for trades executed on
Nasdaq or reported to the FINRA/Nasdaq Trade Reporting Facility.
``Nasdaq Last Sale for Nasdaq'' contains all such transaction
reports for Nasdaq-listed stocks, and ``Nasdaq Last Sale for NYSE/
NYSE American'' contains all such transaction reports for NYSE-
listed stocks and stocks listed on NYSE American and other Tape B
listing venues. See Equity 7, Section 139(a).
    \7\ The full list of NLS components is as follows: Trade Price,
Trade Size, Sale Condition Modifiers, Cumulative Consolidated Market
Volume for Tape A, B, and C securities, End of Day Trade Summary,
Adjusted Closing Price, IPO Information, Bloomberg ID, and pertinent
regulatory Information (such as Market Wide Circuit Breaker, Reg SHO
Short Sale Price Test Restricted Indicator, Trading Action, and
Symbol Directory). See Equity 7, Section 139(e).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74972 (May 15,
2015), 80 FR 29370 (May 21, 2015) (SR-Nasdaq-2015-055) (explaining
that, in distributing NLS Plus, the role of Nasdaq ``is analogous to
that of other market data vendors . . . . [and] performs precisely
the same functions as Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, and dozens of
other market data vendors.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At the close of each trading day, Nasdaq disseminates an EOD
summary message on NLS Plus that includes the following information for
all active Nasdaq- and non-Nasdaq-listed securities:
     Nasdaq Price High: The highest price reported for a last
sale transaction on any Nasdaq venue for the issue symbol during the
current trading day.
     Nasdaq Price Low: The lowest price reported for a last
sale transaction on any Nasdaq venue for the issue symbol during the
current trading day.
     Nasdaq Price Closing: For Nasdaq-listed securities, this
is the Nasdaq Official Closing Price value, if available. For non-
Nasdaq-listed securities, it is the final last sale eligible
transaction reported by any Nasdaq venue for the issue during normal
market hours.
     Consolidated Volume: Reflects the total volume for the
issue reported at the consolidated market level.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See NLS Plus Version 3.0 Technical Specifications, Section
5.8.5 (End of Day Trading Summary) at 29, available at http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/content/technicalsupport/specifications/dataproducts/NLSPlusSpecification3.0.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposal
    The Exchange proposes to enhance the current EOD summary message by
providing the open, high, low, close and volume of a security based on
the consolidated data provided by the UTP and CTA/CQ plans for Tape A,
B \10\ and C \11\ securities. This will require replacing the current
high, low, and close on the Nasdaq exchanges with the following three
fields:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Tape A and Tape B securities are disseminated pursuant to
the Security Industry Automation Corporation's (SIAC's) Consolidated
Tape Association Plan/Consolidated Quotation System (``CTA/CQS'' or
``CTA'').
    \11\ Tape C securities are disseminated pursuant to the NASDAQ
Unlisted Trading Privileges (``UTP'') Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Consolidated Price High: The highest price of any high/low
eligible transaction on Tapes A, B or C received on the trading day.
     Consolidated Price Low: The lowest price of any high/low
eligible transaction on Tapes A, B or C received on the trading day.
     Consolidated Price Close: The final last sale eligible
transaction on Tapes A, B or C received on the trading day.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ If there are no trades or no qualifying trades for a
specific issue, all relevant fields for the EOD summary message will
be left blank.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It will also require adding the following new field to the EOD
summary message:
     Consolidated Price Open: The first last sale eligible
transactions received on the trading day for Tapes A, B or C.

    The Consolidated Volume field will not change.
    The above data will be available to users of the NLS Plus feed on a
delayed basis, 15 minutes after the real-time dissemination of the
above data points on the UTP and CTA/CQ data feeds for that day. The
Exchange is not proposing any change to NLS Plus fees as a result of
this modification.
Discussion
    The NLS Plus data feed, designed for distribution to the general
investing public,\13\ is purchased by broker-dealers for dissemination
to retail investors in the context of the brokerage relationship and
financial media websites for the general investing public, among
others. Approximately 30 firms that purchase or may purchase NLS Plus
have requested that Nasdaq upgrade the EOD summary information to help
investors place trades on the Nasdaq exchanges in the context of U.S.
markets as a whole, rather than just the Nasdaq exchanges.
Specifically, these firms requested that Nasdaq use benchmark prices
for the high, low, opening and closing price of a security as published
by the securities information processors to help investors understand
price movements on the Nasdaq exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82723 (February 15,
2018), 83 FR 7812 (February 22, 2018) (SR-NASDAQ-2018-010) (quoting
SR-NASDAQ-2006-060 (Amendment No. 2, June 10, 2008), at 3
(explaining that NLS was designed to enable market-data
``distributors to provide free access to the data to millions of
individual investors via the internet and television'' and was
expected to ``increase the availability of NASDAQ proprietary market
data to individual investors.''); see also SR-NASDAQ-2006-060
(Amendment No. 2, June 10, 2008) (available at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQ/pdf/nasdaq-filings/2006/SR-NASDAQ-2006-060_Amendment_2.pdf); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57965
(June 16, 2008), 73 FR 35178 (June 20, 2008) (SR-NASDAQ-2006-060)
(approving SR-NASDAQ-2006-060, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2,
to implement NLS on a pilot basis). NLS Plus is a combination of NLS
feeds from the Nasdaq equity exchanges. Like these underlying feeds,
it is mainly designed for the use of the general investing public.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This suggestion by Nasdaq's customers is comparable to changes in
the end of day messages undertaken recently by two of Nasdaq's chief
competitors, Cboe and NYSE, in their top-of-book data feeds. In 2020,
both amended their end of day messages to identify the primary listing
market's official opening and closing price after a 15-minute delay,
which, similar to the proposal by Nasdaq's customers, establish an
external benchmark against which to evaluate exchange data.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89083 (June 17,
2020), 85 FR 37706 (June 23, 2020) (SR-CboeEDGX-2020-029) (amending
the content of the Cboe One Feed to identify the primary listing
market's official opening and closing price after a 15 minute delay,
effective July 10, 2020); NYSE Best Quote and Trades Client
Specification, Version 2.3a (March 30, 2020) available at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/data/NYSE_BQT_Client_Specification_v2.3a.pdf (updated on January 31,
2020, to publish the listing market official opening and closing
price in the Consolidated Stock Summary Messages).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In light of customer requests and changing industry standards,
Nasdaq has determined that the requested change to the EOD summary
message is in the best interest of our customers. The end of day data
published by the securities information processors provides useful
information on the state of the U.S. market as a whole, and including
it on the NLS Plus feed will enhance investor understanding of the
proprietary data distributed by the exchange.\15\ The proposal will
also provide consumers with greater choice by offering an alternative
to other EOD summaries offered in the market. Nasdaq therefore proposes
to modify its EOD summary message to provide the Open, High, Low, Close
and Volume of a security based on the consolidated data provided by the
SIPs. This EOD message will be based on data obtained from the
securities information processors, and will be distributed by Nasdaq as
a vendor of SIP data, and will be subject to competition from all
distributors of SIP data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Any customer that requires access to the high, low, and
closing price of a security on the Nasdaq equity exchanges alone,
and not the U.S. markets as a whole, would continue to have access
to that information on the real-time NLS Plus data feed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed change to the EOD summary message is not targeted at,
or expected to be limited in its applicability to, any particular
segment of market participants, and no segment of retail investors, the
general investing public, or other any other market participant is
expected to benefit more than any other.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ Although this is not a fee filing, the Exchange is
addressing this question to provide as complete as possible an
evaluation of the proposed change. See Division of Trading and
Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, ``Staff Guidance
on SRO Filings Related to Fees'' (May 21, 2019) (``Staff
Guidance''), available at https://www.sec.gov/tm/staff-guidance-sro-rule-filings-fees (indicating that the discussion of purpose should
indicate ``whether the relevant product or service, including the
corresponding proposed fee or fee change, is targeted at--or
expected to be limited in its applicability to--a specific
segment(s) of market participants (and if so, the related
details))''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange expects that the new EOD message will be attractive to
potential customers, and, based on conversations with potential
customers and our overall familiarity with the market, Nasdaq expects
between approximately 10 and 20 additional customers for NLS Plus as a
result of the proposed change.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See id. (requesting that the discussion of purpose address
``the projected number of purchasers (including members, as well as
non-members) of any new or modified product or service and the
expected number of purchasers likely to be subject to a new fee or
pricing tier, including members and non-members . . .'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\18\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\19\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 2015, the Commission found the creation of the NLS Plus data
feed to be ``consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the Act, which requires
that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms
of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general,
to protect investors and the public interest . . . .'' \20\ The NLS
Plus Approval Order noted that NLS Plus disseminated an End of Day
Trade Summary among other messages,\21\ and consolidated volume
information obtained from the UTP and CTA Plans.\22\ As NLS Plus and
the current

end of day messages and volume information have already been shown to
be consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act, this analysis therefore
focuses on the consistency of the proposal to enhance the EOD summary
message with data on the open, high, low and closing price of a
security published by the SIPs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75257 (June 22,
2015), 80 FR 36862, 36864 (June 26, 2015) (SR-Nasdaq-2015-055)
(``NLS Plus Approval Order'').
    \21\ See id. at 36863. (``In addition to last sale information,
NLS Plus also disseminates the following data elements: Trade Price,
Trade Size, Sale Condition Modifiers, Cumulative Consolidated Market
Volume, End of Day Trade Summary, Adjusted Closing Price, IPO
Information, and Bloomberg ID (together the ``data elements''). NLS
Plus also features and disseminates the following messages: Market
Wide Circuit Breaker, Reg SHO Short Sale Price Test Restricted
Indicator, Trading Action, Symbol Directory, Adjusted Closing Price,
and End of Day Trade Summary (together the ``messages'').'').
    \22\ See id. at 36863. (``Consolidated volume reflects the
consolidated volume at the time that the NLS Plus trade message is
generated, and includes the volume for the issue symbol as reported
on the consolidated market data feed. The consolidated volume is
based on the real-time trades reported via the UTP Trade Data Feed
(``UTDF'') and delayed trades reported via CTA. NASDAQ OMX
calculates the real-time trading volume for its trading venues, and
then adds the real-time trading volume for the other (non-NASDAQ
OMX) trading venues as reported via the UTDF data feed. For non-
NASDAQ-listed issues, the consolidated volume is based on trades
reported via SIAC's Consolidated Tape System (``CTS'') for the issue
symbol. The Exchange calculates the real-time trading volume for its
trading venues, and then adds the 15-minute delayed trading volume
for the other (non-NASDAQ OMX) trading venues as reported via the
CTS data feed.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NLS Plus competes with the substitute top-of-book proprietary data
products offered by other exchanges, including the NYSE BQT feed, which
disseminates top-of-book information from the NYSE, NYSE American, NYSE
Arca, NYSE National, and NYSE Chicago exchanges,\23\ and the Cboe One
Summary Feed, which disseminates data from the BZX Exchange, BYX
Exchange, EDGX Exchange and EDGA Exchange.\24\ NLS Plus also competes
with the offerings of data vendors that distribute the proprietary data
feeds of Nasdaq and other exchanges. Of particular importance here,
Nasdaq obtains data from the SIPs on the same terms as any data vendor,
and Nasdaq has no latency, cost, or other advantage in the distribution
of end of day SIP data as proposed herein. Retail customers are
potentially able to obtain such information from any distributor of SIP
data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87803 (December 19,
2019), 84 FR 71505 (December 27, 2019) (SR-NYSE-2019-70) (explaining
that the NYSE BQT market data product competes ``head to head with
the Nasdaq Basic and Cboe One Feed market data products.'').
    \24\ See https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/
market_data_services/
#:~:text=Cboe%20Top%20is%20a%20real,time%20on%20a%20Cboe%20book.&text
=It%20is%20a%20real%2Dtime,time%20on%20a%20Cboe%20book. We note that
Cboe recently proposed a fee reduction for top-of-book data as well.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86670 (August 14, 2019), 84
FR 43207 (August 20, 2019) (SR-CboeBYX-2019-012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This Proposal reflects the competitive nature of these markets. As
noted above, both NYSE and Cboe expanded their end of day summary
messages in 2020 to identify the primary listing market's official
opening and closing price after a 15-minute delay.\25\ Nasdaq's change
to the EOD summary message is, in part, a competitive response to the
data feed changes introduced by these two competitors. The Proposal
also promotes competition by providing investors with an additional
option for receiving consolidated EOD security data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89083 (June 17,
2020), 85 FR 37706 (June 23, 2020) (SR-CboeEDGX-2020-029) (amending
the content of the Cboe One Feed to identify the primary listing
market's official opening and closing price, effective July 10,
2020); NYSE Best Quote and Trades Client Specification, Version 2.3a
(March 30, 2020), available at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/data/NYSE_BQT_Client_Specification_v2.3a.pdf (updated on January 31,
2020, to publish the listing market official opening and closing
price in the Consolidated Stock Summary Messages).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Moreover, as explained above, the Proposal will enhance investor
understanding of the proprietary data distributed by the Exchange by
providing a benchmark against which to compare such changes.
    Competition with other exchanges in the sale of top-of-book
products, coupled with potential competition from vendors in the
distribution of proprietary and consolidated data feeds, and the
likelihood that the Proposal will enhance investor understanding of
securities markets and promote consumer choice, all provide a
substantial basis for finding that the Proposal promotes just and
equitable principles of trade, removes impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and
protects investors and the public interest.
    The Proposal is not unfairly discriminatory. As noted previously,
the NLS Plus data feed was found to be non-discriminatory and otherwise
consistent with the Act in 2015.\26\ The only change here is to enhance
the EOD summary message with data on the open, high, low and closing
price of a security published by the SIPs. As explained above, the
proposed change to the EOD summary message is not targeted at, or
expected to be limited in its applicability to, any particular segment
of market participants, and no segment of retail investors, the general
investing public, or any other market participant is expected to
benefit more than any other. The proposed EOD summary message will be
available to all NLS Plus purchasers, without differentiation of any
kind, and is therefore not unfairly discriminatory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75257 (June 22,
2015), 80 FR 36862, 36864 (June 26, 2015) (SR-Nasdaq-2015-055)
(``NLS Plus Approval Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Intermarket Competition
    The Proposal, which adds the high, low, opening and closing price
of a security as published by the SIP to the NLS Plus EOD message, will
place no burden on intermarket competition (the competition among
SROs). As explained above, NLS Plus already competes directly against
the NYSE BQT feed and the Cboe One Summary Feed, and is subject to
potential competition from market data vendors. In the particular
context of distributing the proposed EOD message, the Exchange is in
direct competition with any vendor of SIP information, and any vendor
not currently distributing SIP data would be able to do so by obtaining
such information from the SIPs and adding that information to their
market data products. Rather than place a burden competition, the
Proposal will enhance competition by providing consumers with greater
choice through an alternative EOD summary not currently offered by NYSE
or Cboe.
Intramarket Competition
    The Proposal will not cause any unnecessary or inappropriate burden
on intramarket competition (competition among exchange customers). As
explained above, the Proposal is not targeted at, or expected to be
limited in its applicability to, any particular segment of market
participants, and no segment of retail investors, the general investing
public, or any other market participant is expected to benefit more
than any other. As such, the Proposal does not place any category of
market participant at a relative disadvantage compared to any other
market participant, and therefore will not impose any burden on
competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section

19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \27\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \28\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2021-010 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2021-010. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2021-010 and should be submitted
on or before March 29, 2021.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-04681 Filed 3-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 23 (Friday, February 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5520-5521]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2462]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0001]

Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and
recommendations to the Agency on FDA's regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on March 20, 2012, from 8
a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: FDA White Oak Campus, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31
Conference Center, the Great Room (Rm. 1503), Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002. Information regarding special accommodations due to a disability,
visitor parking, and transportation may be accessed at: http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm; under the heading
``Resources for You,'' click on ``Public Meetings at the FDA White Oak
Campus.'' Please note that visitors to the White Oak Campus must enter
through Building 1.
    Contact Person: Caleb Briggs, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
31, Rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, Fax: (301)
847-8533, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or FDA Advisory Committee
Information Line, 1-(800) 741-8138<PHONE_NUMBER> in the Washington, DC
area), and follow the prompts to the desired center or product area.
Please call the Information Line for up-to-date information on this
meeting. A notice in the Federal Register about last minute
modifications that impact a previously announced advisory committee
meeting cannot always be published quickly enough to provide timely
notice. Therefore, you should always check the Agency's Web site and
call the appropriate advisory committee hot line/phone line to learn
about possible modifications before coming to the meeting.
    Agenda: On March 20, 2012, during the morning session, the
committee will discuss supplemental new drug

application (NDA) 022465/S-010, VOTRIENT (pazopanib hydrochloride)
Tablets, application submitted by Glaxo Wellcome Manufacturing Pte Ltd.
doing business as GlaxoSmithKline. The proposed indication (use) for
this product is for the treatment of patients with advanced soft tissue
sarcoma (STS) who have received prior chemotherapy. The phase 3 STS
trial population excluded patients with adipocytic STS or
gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
    During the afternoon session, the committee will discuss NDA
022576, with the proposed trade name TALTORVIC (ridaforolimus) Tablets,
application submitted by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. The proposed
indication (use) for this product is for the treatment of adult and
pediatric patients (aged 13 through 17 years with weight over 100 lb or
45.4 kg) with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma or bone sarcoma as a
maintenance therapy for patients who have completed at least 4 cycles
of chemotherapy without evidence of disease progression.
    FDA intends to make background material available to the public no
later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post
the background material on its Web site prior to the meeting, the
background material will be made publicly available at the location of
the advisory committee meeting, and the background material will be
posted on FDA's Web site after the meeting. Background material is
available at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/Calendar/default.htm. Scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee link.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee.
Written submissions may be made to the contact person on or before
March 6, 2012. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled
between approximately 10:30 a.m. to 11 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.
Those individuals interested in making formal oral presentations should
notify the contact person and submit a brief statement of the general
nature of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and
addresses of proposed participants, and an indication of the
approximate time requested to make their presentation on or before
February 27, 2012. Time allotted for each presentation may be limited.
If the number of registrants requesting to speak is greater than can be
reasonably accommodated during the scheduled open public hearing
session, FDA may conduct a lottery to determine the speakers for the
scheduled open public hearing session. The contact person will notify
interested persons regarding their request to speak by February 28,
2012.
    Persons attending FDA's advisory committee meetings are advised
that the Agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical
outlets.
    FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with
physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special
accommodations due to a disability, please contact Caleb Briggs at
least 7 days in advance of the meeting.
    FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm111462.htm for procedures
on public conduct during advisory committee meetings.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: January 31, 2012.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2012-2462 Filed 2-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 143 (Thursday, July 25, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44873-44874]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17811]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 61

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0100; Amdt. Nos. 61-130A]
RIN 2120-AJ67

Pilot Certification and Qualification Requirements for Air
Carrier Operations; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a final rule published on July 15, 2013
(78 FR 42324). In that rule, which became effective on July 15, 2013,
the date of publication, the FAA amended its regulations to create new
certification and qualification requirements for pilots in air carrier
operations. This document corrects errors in the regulatory text of
that document.

DATES: Effective: July 25, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning
this correction contact Barbara Adams, Air Transportation Division,
AFS-200, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile (202) 267-
5299, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For legal questions concerning this correction contact Anne Moore,
Office of the Chief Counsel--International Law, Legislation, and
Regulations Division, AGC-240, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-
3123; facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 15, 2013, the FAA published a final rule entitled, ``Pilot
Certification and Qualification Requirements for Air Carrier
Operations'' (78 FR 42324). In that final rule, which became effective
July 15, 2013, the FAA revised the aeronautical experience requirements
for an airline transport pilot (ATP) certificate in Sec.  61.159(a) by
adding paragraph (a)(3) which requires pilots to obtain 50 hours in the
class of airplane for the ATP certificate sought and by revising former
paragraph (a)(5) to permit pilots to credit time in a flight simulation
training device (FSTD) accomplished in approved training programs under
parts 121, 135, and 141 toward the aeronautical experience requirements
for the ATP certificate. Under the prior rule, only FSTD time
accomplished as part of an approved training course in part 142 could
be credited.

Correction

    In the amendatory language, the FAA mistakenly directed that
redesignated paragraph (a)(5) be revised to permit the FSTD time in
parts 121, 135, and 141 to be credited. In fact, because the final rule
added new paragraph (a)(3), the amendatory language should have
directed that redesignated paragraph (a)(6) should be revised.
Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this correction to

restore former paragraph (a)(4) \1\ which was inadvertently removed
from the final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Former Sec.  61.159(a)(4) [new paragraph (a)(5)] pertains to
pilot in command flight time requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 61

    Aircraft, Airmen, Aviation safety.

The Correcting Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration chapter I of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:

PART 61--CERTIFICATION: PILOTS, FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS, AND GROUND
INSTRUCTORS

0
1. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113, 44701-44703, 44707,
44709-44711, 45102-45103, 45301-45302.

0
2. Amend Sec.  61.159 as follows:
0
A. Remove paragraph (a)(6);
0
B. Redesignate paragraph (a)(5) as (a)(6); and
0
C. Add a new paragraph (a)(5).
    The addition reads as follows:

Sec.  61.159  Aeronautical experience: Airplane category rating.

    (a) * * *
    (5) 250 hours of flight time in an airplane as a pilot in command,
or as second in command performing the duties of pilot in command while
under the supervision of a pilot in command, or any combination
thereof, which includes at least--
    (i) 100 hours of cross-country flight time; and
    (ii) 25 hours of night flight time.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC under the authority provided by 49
U.S.C. 106(f), 44701(a) and Secs. 216-217, Public Law 111-216, 124
Stat. 2348 on July 19, 2013.
Lirio Liu,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2013-17811 Filed 7-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 190 (Monday, October 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60004-60005]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24074]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending September 8, 2012.

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers,
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2012-0152.
    Date Filed: September 6, 2012.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify
Scope: September 27, 2012.

    Description: Application of EZjet GT, Inc. d/b/a EZjet Airways
(``EZjet'') requesting a foreign air carrier permit to engage in
scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail
between any point or points in Guyana and any point or points in the
United States, and to the extent necessary EZjet further requests
exemption authority to provide the services described above pending
issuance of a foreign air carrier permit.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2012-24074 Filed 9-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


From:
Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Tuesday, August 6, 2019 3:31 PM
To:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:
Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
August 2019 QA/QC Review of Enclosure 1 Information for EPA 2016 ICR for selected Coke Manufacturing facilities

Hello Rich  -  Attached is your company's information supplied to EPA for the 2016 Information Collection Request (ICR) in one Excel file and your facility's diagrams in a "zipped" file.

Thank you again for your efforts in providing your facility's information. Now is the time to correct, update, or add to your responses from 2016 for Enclosure 1.

Please add a duplicate column with corrected information and any comments. Highlight the heading in the duplicate column YELLOW and use red font, as in the example in the next worksheet. If there are no changes, you do not need to do anything. See example corrections in the next worksheet called "Example-Edits." We will assume any data without a comment is correct for your facility in 2016 or the year indicated in the question.

Keep in mind we are NOT asking you to update your responses to 2019, but only to correct or supply information related to your 2016 facility and 2016 test data (if applicable). However, you may voluntarily provide any additional information for 2019, if you so choose, and label accordingly. Please make sure you indicate the year of the additional information with any new information.

Note clarification for Part IV, Q25 and Q27: This pertains to ALL pollution control equipment (for ALL air pollution, including both air toxics AND criteria pollutants, such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, etc.)

If you have any questions, please first send an email to both Gabrielle Raymond,  the RTI Contractor, and me at the email addresses below. If we need to speak on the phone, we can follow-up with a call, but we need an email first to ensure contact.
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>

Note that we will be summarizing CBI data in Enclosure 1 separately at some not yet determined point in the future. However, we will be sending you your Enclosure 2 data soon, hopefully by mid to end of August. The review of Enclosure 1 likely will not take that long for most of the Coke facilities, so I advise you to review Enclosure 1 soon so that you can focus on Enclosure 2 when it arrives.

_____________________________________________________________
Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Gr (D 243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

<< Arcelor-Mittal-Coke-Enclosure-1-Questionnaire ICR-draft summary-review-August-5-2019.xlsx >>
<< ArcelorMittal.zip >>


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 25 (Monday, February 8, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6448-6450]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02283]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2015-7484; Airspace Docket No. 15-AGL-24]

Amendment of Class E Airspace for the Following Minnesota Towns:
Rochester, MN; and St. Cloud, MN

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends the legal description of the Class E
surface area airspace and Class E airspace designated as an extension,
at Rochester International Airport, Rochester, MN, and St. Cloud
Regional Airport, St. Cloud, MN, eliminating the Notice to Airmen
(NOTAM) part-time status. This action also updates the geographic
coordinates of Rochester International Airport to coincide with the
FAA's aeronautical database.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, March 31, 2016. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under Title 1,
Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC, 29591; telephone: 202-267-
8783. The Order is

also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of FAA Order
7400.9Z at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends controlled airspace at Rochester International Airport,
Rochester, MN and St. Cloud Regional Airport, St. Cloud, MN.

History

    In a review of the airspace, the FAA found the Class E surface
airspace and Class E airspace designated as an extension, for Rochester
International Airport, Rochester, MN, and St. Cloud Regional Airport,
St. Cloud, MN, as published in FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, does not require part time status. This is an
administrative change removing the part time NOTAM information from the
legal descriptions for the above airports.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6002 and
6004 of FAA Order 7400.9Z dated August 6, 2015, and effective September
15, 2015, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The
Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015, and effective September 15,
2015. FAA Order 7400.9Z is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.9Z lists Class A, B,
C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and reporting
points.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by eliminating the NOTAM information that reads, ``This Class E
airspace is effective during the specific dates and times established
in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continuously published in the Airport/Facility
Directory.'' from the regulatory text of Class E surface area airspace
and Class E airspace designated as an extension to Class D, at
Rochester International Airport, Rochester, MN, and St. Cloud Regional
Airport, St. Cloud, MN. Additionally, the geographic coordinates of the
Rochester International Airport are being updated to coincide with the
FAA's aeronautical database.
    This is an administrative change amending the description for the
above Minnesota airports to be in concert with the FAA's aeronautical
database, and does not affect the boundaries, or operating requirements
of the airspace; therefore, notice and public procedure under 5 U.S.C.
553(b) are unnecessary.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected
to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015,
effective September 15, 2015, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

AGL MN E2 Rochester, MN (Amended)

Rochester International Airport, MN
    (Lat. 43[deg]54'30'' N., long. 92[deg]30'00'' W.)
Rochester VOR/DME
    (Lat. 43[deg]46'58'' N., long. 92[deg]35'49'' W.)

    Within a 4.3-mile radius of Rochester International Airport, and
within 3.1 miles each side of the Rochester VOR/DME 028[deg] radial,
extending from the 4.3-mile radius to 7 miles southwest of the
airport.

AGL MN E2 St. Cloud, MN (Amended)

St. Cloud Regional Airport, MN
    (Lat. 45[deg]32'48'' N., long. 94[deg]03'36'' W.)
St. Cloud VOR/DME
    (Lat. 45[deg]32'58'' N., long. 94[deg]03'31'' W.)

    Within a 4.1-mile radius of St. Cloud Regional Airport and
within 2.4 miles each side of the St. Cloud VOR/DME 143[deg] radial,
extending from the 4.1-mile radius to 7.2 miles southeast of the
airport.
* * * * *

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to
a Class D or Class E Surface Area.

* * * * *

AGL MN E4 Rochester, MN (Amended)

Rochester International Airport, MN
    (Lat. 43[deg]54'30'' N., long. 92[deg]30'00'' W.)
Rochester VOR/DME
    (Lat. 43[deg]46'58'' N., long. 92[deg]35'49'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 3.1 miles
each side of Rochester VOR/DME 028[deg] radial, extending from the
4.3-mile radius to 7 miles southwest of the airport.

AGL MN E4 St. Cloud, MN (Amended)

St. Cloud Regional Airport, MN
    (Lat. 45[deg]32'48'' N., long. 94[deg]03'36'' W.)
St. Cloud VOR/DME
    (Lat. 45[deg]32'58'' N., long. 94[deg]03'31'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 2.4 miles
each side of St. Cloud VOR/DME 143[deg] radial extending from the
4.1-mile radius of St. Cloud Regional Airport to 7.2 miles southeast
of the airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 27, 2016.
Robert W. Beck,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2016-02283 Filed 2-5-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Narrative of Revisions

Collection Title:  Bridge Permit Application Guide

OMB Control No.:  1625-0015

Current Expiration Date:  1/31/2016

Collection Instruments:  CG-BRG Instructions

The following listed below are revisions to the collection:

Sections 12 and 14 of the Supporting Statement have been revised based
upon changes to the Coast Guard reimbursable rates and permit data as
reported by the Coast Guard district bridge offices.

The Coast Guard has updated its reporting requirements which now require
the district bridge offices to report all in-process and all completed
work on the Bridge Program Quarterly Activities Report.  Growth
identified between FY12 and FY14 (average of 17%) is indicative of
normal permit request growth rates currently being experienced within
the Program and this rate of growth is anticipated to continue in the
future.. The data from the Quarterly Reports was utilized to populate
the permit numbers for FY12-FY14 on the Supporting Statement