[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 39736]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15796]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-1106]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office
of Management and Budget Approval; Establishing and Maintaining a List
of U.S. Dairy Product Manufacturers/Processors With Interest in
Exporting to Chile

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
collection of information entitled ``Establishing and Maintaining a
List of U.S. Dairy Product Manufacturers/Processors With Interest in
Exporting to Chile'' has been approved by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Domini Bean, Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B,
Rockville, MD 20850,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 25, 2013, the Agency submitted a
proposed collection of information entitled, ``Establishing and
Maintaining a List of U.S. Dairy Product Manufacturers/Processors With
Interest in Exporting to Chile'' to OMB for review and clearance under
44 U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0509.
The approval expires on May 31, 2016. A copy of the supporting
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: June 26, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-15796 Filed 7-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 174 (Friday, September 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45480-45481]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19453]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket No. PHMSA-2016-0128]

Pipeline Safety: Meeting of the Voluntary Information-Sharing
System Working Group

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a public meeting of the Voluntary
Information-sharing System (VIS) Working Group. The VIS Working Group
will convene to discuss and identify recommendations to establish a
voluntary information-sharing system.

DATES: The public meeting will be held on October 3, 2018, from 8:30
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. ET. Members of the public who wish to attend in
person should register no later than September 26, 2018. Individuals
requiring accommodations, such as sign language interpretation or other
ancillary aids, may notify PHMSA by September 26, 2018. For additional
information, see the ADDRESSES section.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590. The
meeting agenda and additional information will be published on the
following VIS Working Group registration page at: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/meetings/MtgHome.mtg?mtg=139.
    The meetings will not be webcast; however, presentations will be
available on the meeting website and posted on the E-Gov website,
https://www.regulations.gov/, under docket number PHMSA-2016-0128
within 30 days following the meeting.
    Public Participation: This meeting will be open to the public.
Members of the public who attend in person will also be provided an
opportunity to make a statement during the meetings.
    Written comments: Persons who wish to submit written comments on
the

meetings may submit them to the docket in the following ways:
    E-Gov Website: https://www.regulations.gov. This site allows the
public to enter comments on any Federal Register notice issued by any
agency.
    Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation
(DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    Hand Delivery: Room W12-140 on the ground level of the DOT West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except on Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Identify the docket number PHMSA-2016-0128 at the
beginning of your comments. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
    Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received into
any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). Therefore, consider reviewing DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477), or view the Privacy Notice at https://www.regulations.gov before submitting comments.
    Docket: For docket access or to read background documents or
comments, go to https://www.regulations.gov at any time or to Room W12-
140 on the ground level of the DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    If you wish to receive confirmation of receipt of your written
comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped postcard with the
following statement: ``Comments on PHMSA-2016- 0128.'' The docket clerk
will date stamp the postcard prior to returning it to you via the U.S.
mail.

Privacy Act Statement

    DOT may solicit comments from the public regarding certain general
notices. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including any personal
information the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as
described in the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about the meeting,
contact Dr. Christie Murray by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
[email protected].
    Services for Individuals with Disabilities: The public meeting will
be physically accessible to people with disabilities. Individuals
requiring accommodations, such as sign language interpretation or other
ancillary aids, are asked to notify Christie Murray at
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The VIS Working Group is an advisory committee established in
accordance with Section 10 of the Protecting our Infrastructure of
Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2016 (Pub. L. 114-183), the
Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C., App. 2, as amended),
and 41 CFR 102-3.50(a).

II. Meeting Details and Agenda

    The VIS Working Group agenda will include briefings on topics such
as mandate requirements, subcommittee considerations, lessons learned,
examples of existing information-sharing systems, and proposed
subcommittee recommendations. As part of its work, the committee will
ultimately provide recommendations to the Secretary, as required and
specifically outlined in Section 10 of Public Law 114-183, addressing:
    (a) The need for, and the identification of, a system to ensure
that dig verification data are shared with in-line inspection operators
to the extent consistent with the need to maintain proprietary and
security-sensitive data in a confidential manner to improve pipeline
safety and inspection technology;
    (b) Ways to encourage the exchange of pipeline inspection
information and the development of advanced pipeline inspection
technologies and enhanced risk analysis;
    (c) Opportunities to share data, including dig verification data
between operators of pipeline facilities and in-line inspector vendors
to expand knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages of the
different types of in-line inspection technology and methodologies;
    (d) Options to create a secure system that protects proprietary
data while encouraging the exchange of pipeline inspection information
and the development of advanced pipeline inspection technologies and
enhanced risk analysis;
    (e) Means and best practices for the protection of safety and
security-sensitive information and proprietary information; and
    (f) Regulatory, funding, and legal barriers to sharing the
information described in paragraphs (a) through (d).
    The Secretary will publish the VIS Working Group's recommendations
on a publicly available DOT website and in the docket. The VIS Working
Group will fulfill its purpose once its recommendations are published
online.
    PHMSA will publish the agenda on the PHMSA meeting page https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/meetings/MtgHome.mtg?mtg=139, once it is
finalized.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 4, 2018, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.
Linda Daugherty,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Field Operations.
[FR Doc. 2018-19453 Filed 9-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19278-19279]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7644]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP12-91-000]

Leaf River Energy Center LLC; Notice of Application

    On March 20, 2012, Leaf River Energy Center LLC (Leaf River), 53
Riverside Avenue, Westport, Connecticut 06880, filed with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) an application under section
7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), as amended, and part 157 of the
Commission's regulations for an order amending the certificate of
public convenience and necessity issued in Docket No. CP08-8-000 as
amended in Docket No. CP11-107-000, to authorize Leaf River to
reallocate the aggregate total facility certificated storage capacity
of the Leaf River Energy Center among the previously authorized
caverns, all as more fully detailed in the Application. Leaf River
states that this amendment does not involve any change in total
facility certificated capacity, pressures, injection rates or
withdrawal rates authorized by the Commission in the original
certificate order, but will result in changes in individual cavern
capacities.
    Questions regarding the application may be directed to James F.
Bowe, Jr., Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP, 1101 New York Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20005-4213,<PHONE_NUMBER> (phone),<PHONE_NUMBER> (fax), or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of

the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit seven copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental cementers will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental cementers will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the nonparty commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and seven copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426. This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov using
the ``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free) or TTY,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 16, 2012

    Dated: March 26, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-7644 Filed 3-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 97 (Thursday, May 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 31632]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11768]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0355; FRL-9946-24-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Clay Ceramics Manufacturing,
Glass Manufacturing, and Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing Area
Sources (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for Clay Ceramics
Manufacturing, Glass Manufacturing, and Secondary Nonferrous Metals
Processing Area Sources (40 CFR part 63, subpart RRRRRR, SSSSSS and
TTTTTT) (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No. 2274.05, OMB Control No. 2060-0606),
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved
through May 31, 2016. Public comments were previously requested via the
Federal Register (80 FR 32116) on June 5, 2015 during a 60-day comment
period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public
comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its
estimated burden and cost to the public. An Agency may neither conduct
nor sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before June 20, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2013-0355, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: Owners and operators of affected facilities are required
to comply with reporting and record keeping requirements for the
general provisions of 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, as well as for the
specific requirements at 40 CFR part 63, subparts RRRRRR, SSSSSS, and
TTTTTT. This includes submitting initial notification reports,
performance tests and periodic reports and results, and maintaining
records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or
malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period
during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These reports are
used by EPA to determine compliance with these standards.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Clay ceramics manufacturing, glass
manufacturing, and secondary nonferrous metals processing facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subparts RRRRRR, SSSSSS and TTTTTT).
    Estimated number of respondents: 82 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially.
    Total estimated burden: 1,810 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $197,000 (per year), which includes $9,850 in
either annualized capital/startup or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an adjustment increase in
respondent labor hours and costs in this ICR from the most recently
approved ICR. This is not due to any program changes. The increase
occurred because this ICR assumes all existing respondents will take
some time each year to re-familiarize with the regulatory requirements.
Additionally, there is a small decrease of $4 in the estimated O&M cost
due to rounding. This ICR rounds all calculated burden and costs to
three significant digits. There is no change in the methodology or
assumptions used to calculate the O&M cost.

Courtney Kerwin,
Acting-Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-11768 Filed 5-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 23 (Friday, February 2, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4838-4840]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02095]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Parts 100, 117, 147, and 165

[USCG-2018-0048]

2017 Quarterly Listings; Safety Zones, Security Zones, Special
Local Regulations, Drawbridge Operation Regulations and Regulated
Navigation Areas

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notification of expired temporary rules issued.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notification of substantive rules
issued by the Coast Guard that were made temporarily effective but
expired before they could be published in the Federal Register. This
document lists temporary safety zones, security zones, special local
regulations, drawbridge operation regulations and regulated navigation
areas, all of limited duration and for which timely publication in the
Federal Register was not possible.

DATES: This document lists temporary Coast Guard rules that became
effective, primarily between April 2017 to June 2017, unless otherwise
indicated, and were terminated before they could be published in the
Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Temporary rules listed in this document may be viewed
online, under their respective docket numbers, using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions on this document contact
Yeoman First Class David Hager, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Coast Guard District Commanders and Captains
of the Port (COTP) must be immediately responsive to the safety and
security needs within their jurisdiction; therefore, District
Commanders and COTPs have been delegated the authority to issue certain
local regulations. Safety zones may be established for safety or
environmental purposes. A safety zone may be stationary and described
by fixed limits or it may be described as a zone around a vessel in
motion. Security zones limit access to prevent injury or damage to
vessels, ports, or waterfront facilities. Special local regulations are
issued to enhance the safety of participants and spectators at regattas
and other marine events. Drawbridge operation regulations authorize
changes to drawbridge schedules to accommodate bridge repairs, seasonal
vessel traffic, and local public events. Regulated Navigation Areas are
water areas within a defined boundary for which regulations for vessels
navigating within the area have been established by the regional Coast
Guard District Commander.
    Timely publication of these rules in the Federal Register may be
precluded when a rule responds to an emergency, or when an event occurs
without sufficient advance notice. The affected public is, however,
often informed of these rules through Local Notices to Mariners, press
releases, and other means. Moreover, actual notification is provided by
Coast Guard patrol vessels enforcing the restrictions imposed by the
rule. Because Federal Register publication was not possible before the
end of the effective period, mariners were personally notified of the
contents of these safety zones, security zones, special local
regulations, regulated navigation areas or drawbridge operation
regulations by Coast Guard officials on-scene prior to any enforcement
action. However, the Coast Guard, by law, must publish in the Federal
Register notice of substantive rules adopted. To meet this obligation
without imposing undue expense on the public, the Coast Guard
periodically publishes a list of these temporary safety zones, security
zones, special local regulations, regulated navigation areas and
drawbridge operation regulations. Permanent rules are not included in
this list because they are published in their entirety in the Federal
Register. Temporary rules are also published in their entirety if
sufficient time is available to do so before they are placed in effect
or terminated.
    The following unpublished rules were placed in effect temporarily
during the period between April 2017 to June 2017 unless otherwise
indicated. To view copies of these rules, visit www.regulations.gov and
search by the docket number indicated in the following table.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Effective
             Docket No.                           Type                        Location                 date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USCG-2016-0085......................  Security Zones..............  Montgomery County, MD.......       3/25/2017
USCG-2016-0086......................  Security Zones..............  Montgomery County, MD.......       3/26/2017
USCG-2017-0128......................  Special Local Regulations...  Tuscaloosa, AL..............        4/1/2017
USCG-2016-0087......................  Security Zones..............  Montgomery County, MD.......        4/1/2017

USCG-2017-0271......................  Safety Zones................  Apra Outer Harbor, GU.......        4/7/2017
USCG-2017-0288......................  Safety Zones................  Catskill, NY................        4/7/2017
USCG-2017-0235......................  Safety Zones................  Savannah, GA................        4/8/2017
USCG-2017-0205......................  Safety Zones................  Onslow County, NC...........       4/10/2017
USCG-2017-0013......................  Safety Zones................  Pittsburgh, PA..............       4/17/2017
USCG-2017-0017......................  Safety Zones................  Daytona Beach, FL...........       4/21/2017
USGC-2017-0247......................  Safety Zones................  Panama City, FL.............       4/21/2017
USCG-2017-0214......................  Safety Zones................  Piti, GU....................       4/21/2017
USCG-2017-0168......................  Special Local Regulations...  Corsica River, MD...........       4/22/2017
USGC-2017-0031......................  Safety Zones................  Myrtle Beach, SC............       4/23/2017
USCG-2017-0337......................  Security Zones..............  Oahu, HI....................       4/23/2017
USCG-2017-0296......................  Safety Zones................  Tennessee River.............       4/24/2017
USCG-2017-0361......................  Safety Zones................  U.S. Virgin Island..........       4/29/2017
USCG-2017-0381......................  Safety Zones................  St. Louis, MO...............        5/2/2017
USCG-2017-0295......................  Safety Zones................  Upper Mississippi River.....        5/4/2017
USCG-2017-0380......................  Security Zones..............  Manhattan, NY...............        5/4/2017
USCG-2017-0380......................  Security Zones..............  Manhattan, NY...............        5/4/2017
USCG-2017-0138......................  Safety Zones................  Fort Lauderdale, FL.........        5/4/2017
USCG-2017-0249......................  Safety Zones................  Mobile, Al..................        5/5/2017
USCG-2017-0090......................  Security Zones..............  Pittsburgh, PA..............        5/5/2017
USCG-2017-0280......................  Security Zones..............  Montgomery County, MD.......       5/14/2017
USGC-2017-0431......................  Safety Zones................  St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin            5/15/2017
                                                                     Islands.
USCG-2017-0432......................  Safety Zones................  St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin            5/16/2017
                                                                     Islands.
USCG-2017-0413......................  Security Zones..............  New London, CT..............       5/17/2017
USCG-2017-0123......................  Safety Zones................  Charleston, SC..............       5/18/2017
USCG-2017-0352......................  Safety Zones................  Apra Outer Harbor, GU.......       5/18/2017
USCG-2017-0206......................  Special Local Regulations...  Urbanna, VA.................       5/20/2017
USCG-2017-0477......................  Safety Zones................  Vicksburg, MS...............       5/23/2017
USCG-2017-0479......................  Safety Zones................  Vidalia, LA.................       5/24/2017
USGC-2017-0489......................  Safety Zones................  St. Louis, MO...............       5/26/2017
USCG-2016-0345......................  Safety Zones................  Chicago, IL.................       5/27/2017
USCG-2017-0343......................  Special Local Regulations...  Nashville, TN...............       5/27/2017
USCG-2017-0459......................  Security Zones..............  Montgomery County, Maryland.       5/28/2017
USCG-2017-0382......................  Safety Zones................  Merizo, GU..................       5/28/2017
USCG-2017-0404......................  Safety Zones................  Port Lake Michigan..........       5/28/2017
USCG-2017-0376......................  Safety Zones................  San Diego COTP..............       5/28/2017
USCG-2012-0309......................  Safety Zones................  Chicago, IL.................        6/1/2017
USCG-2017-0193......................  Safety Zones................  Beaumont, TX................        6/1/2017
USCG-2017-0192......................  Safety Zones................  Hackberry, LA...............        6/2/2017
USCG-2017-0391......................  Safety Zones................  Bellaire, OH................        6/3/2017
USCG-2017-0358......................  Safety Zones................  Lakeside, MO................        6/3/2017
USCG-2017-0457......................  Safety Zones................  East River, NY..............        6/4/2017
USCG-2017-0518......................  Security Zones..............  Cincimnnati, OH.............        6/7/2017
USCG-2017-0265......................  Special Local Regulations...  Parker, AZ..................       6/10/2017
USCG-2017-0265......................  Special Local Regulations...  Parker, AZ..................       6/10/2017
USCG-2017-0199......................  Safety Zones................  Vermilion, OH...............       6/16/2017
USCG-2017-0487......................  Special Local Regulations...  Cumberland River, TN........       6/17/2017
USCG-2017-0559......................  Safety Zones................  Houghton, MI................       6/17/2017
USCG-2017-0405......................  Special Local Regulations...  St. Petersburg, FL..........       6/17/2017
USCG-2017-0567......................  Security Zones..............  Puget Sound.................       6/20/2017
USCG-2017-0511......................  Safety Zones................  Chicago, IL.................       6/20/2017
USCG-2017-0519......................  Safety Zones................  Biloxi, MS..................       6/24/2017
USCG-2017-0574......................  Safety Zones................  DE and NJ...................       6/25/2017
USCG-2017-0623......................  Security Zones..............  Cleveland, OH...............       6/28/2017
USCG-2012-1036......................  Safety Zones................  Port Long Island............       6/29/2017
USCG-2017-0615......................  Safety Zones................  Traverse City, Michigan.....       6/29/2017
USCG-2017-0465......................  Safety Zones................  Jacksonville, FL............       6/30/2017
USCG-2015-0371......................  Safety Zones................  Tanapag Harbor, Saipan......        8/4/2015
USCG-2016-0977......................  Security Zones..............  Cleveland, OH...............      10/21/2016
USCG-2016-0085......................  Security Zones..............  Montgomery County, MD.......       3/25/2017
USCG-2016-0086......................  Security Zones..............  Montgomery County, MD.......       3/26/2017
USCG-2017-0264......................  Security Zones..............  San Diego Bay, CA...........       3/28/2017
USCG-2017-0128......................  Special Local Regulations...  Tuscaloosa, AL..............        4/1/2017
USCG-2016-0087......................  Security Zones..............  Montgomery County, MD.......        4/1/2017
USCG-2017-0271......................  Safety Zones................  Apra Outer Harbor, GU.......        4/7/2017
USCG-2017-0288......................  Safety Zones................  Catskill, NY................        4/7/2017
USCG-2017-0235......................  Safety Zones................  Savannah, GA................        4/8/2017
USCG-2017-0205......................  Safety Zones................  Onslow County, NC...........       4/10/2017
USCG-2017-0013......................  Safety Zones................  Pittsburgh, PA..............       4/17/2017
USCG-2017-0017......................  Safety Zones................  Daytona Beach, FL...........       4/21/2017
USGC-2017-0247......................  Safety Zones................  Panama City, FL.............       4/21/2017
USCG-2017-0214......................  Safety Zones................  Piti, GU....................       4/21/2017
USCG-2017-0168......................  Special Local Regulations...  Corsica River, MD...........       4/22/2017

USGC-2017-0031......................  Safety Zones................  Myrtle Beach, SC............       4/23/2017
USCG-2017-0337......................  Security Zones..............  Oahu, HI....................       4/23/2017
USCG-2017-0296......................  Safety Zones................  Tennessee River.............       4/24/2017
USCG-2017-0361......................  Safety Zones................  U.S. Virgin Island..........       4/29/2017
USCG-2017-0381......................  Safety Zones................  St. Louis, MO...............        5/2/2017
USCG-2017-0295......................  Safety Zones................  Upper Mississippi River.....        5/4/2017
USCG-2017-0380......................  Security Zones..............  Manhattan, NY...............        5/4/2017
USCG-2017-0380......................  Security Zones..............  Manhattan, NY...............        5/4/2017
USCG-2017-0138......................  Safety Zones................  Fort Lauderdale, FL.........        5/4/2017
USCG-2017-0249......................  Safety Zones................  Mobile, Al..................        5/5/2017
USCG-2017-0090......................  Security Zones..............  Pittsburgh, PA..............        5/5/2017
USCG-2017-0293......................  Safety Zones................  Port Lake Michigan..........       5/13/2017
USCG-2017-0280......................  Security Zones..............  Montgomery County, MD.......       5/14/2017
USGC-2017-0431......................  Safety Zones................  St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin            5/15/2017
                                                                     Islands.
USCG-2017-0432......................  Safety Zones................  St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin            5/16/2017
                                                                     Islands.
USCG-2017-0413......................  Security Zones..............  New London, CT..............       5/17/2017
USCG-2017-0123......................  Safety Zones................  Charleston, SC..............       5/18/2017
USCG-2017-0123......................  Safety Zones................  Charleston, SC..............       5/18/2017
USCG-2017-0352......................  Safety Zones................  Apra Outer Harbor, GU.......       5/18/2017
USCG-2017-0206......................  Special Local Regulations...  Urbanna, VA.................       5/20/2017
USCG-2017-0477......................  Safety Zones................  Vicksburg, MS...............       5/23/2017
USCG-2017-0479......................  Safety Zones................  Vidalia, LA.................       5/24/2017
USGC-2017-0489......................  Safety Zones................  St. Louis, MO...............       5/26/2017
USCG-2016-0345......................  Safety Zones................  Chicago, IL.................       5/27/2017
USCG-2017-0343......................  Special Local Regulations...  Nashville, TN...............       5/27/2017
USCG-2017-0459......................  Security Zones..............  Montgomery County, Maryland.       5/28/2017
USCG-2017-0382......................  Safety Zones................  Merizo, GU..................       5/28/2017
USCG-2017-0404......................  Safety Zones................  Port Lake Michigan..........       5/28/2017
USCG-2017-0376......................  Safety Zones................  San Diego COTP..............       5/28/2017
USCG-2012-0309......................  Safety Zones................  Chicago, IL.................        6/1/2017
USCG-2017-0193......................  Safety Zones................  Beaumont, TX................        6/1/2017
USCG-2017-0192......................  Safety Zones................  Hackberry, LA...............        6/2/2017
USCG-2017-0391......................  Safety Zones................  Bellaire, OH................        6/3/2017
USCG-2017-0358......................  Safety Zones................  Lakeside, MO................        6/3/2017
USCG-2017-0457......................  Safety Zones................  East River, NY..............        6/4/2017
USCG-2017-0518......................  Security Zones..............  Cincimnnati, OH.............        6/7/2017
USCG-2017-0265......................  Special Local Regulations...  Parker, AZ..................       6/10/2017
USCG-2017-0265......................  Special Local Regulations...  Parker, AZ..................       6/10/2017
USCG-2017-0199......................  Safety Zones................  Vermilion, OH...............       6/16/2017
USCG-2017-0487......................  Special Local Regulations...  Cumberland River, TN........       6/17/2017
USCG-2017-0559......................  Safety Zones................  Houghton, MI................       6/17/2017
USCG-2017-0405......................  Special Local Regulations...  St. Petersburg, FL..........       6/17/2017
USCG-2017-0567......................  Security Zones..............  Puget Sound.................       6/20/2017
USCG-2017-0511......................  Safety Zones................  Chicago, IL.................       6/20/2017
USCG-2017-0519......................  Safety Zones................  Biloxi, MS..................       6/24/2017
USCG-2017-0574......................  Safety Zones................  DE and NJ...................       6/25/2017
USCG-2017-0623......................  Security Zones..............  Cleveland, OH...............       6/28/2017
USCG-2012-1036......................  Safety Zones................  Port Long Island............       6/29/2017
USCG-2017-0615......................  Safety Zones................  Traverse City, Michigan.....       6/29/2017
USCG-2017-0465......................  Safety Zones................  Jacksonville, FL............       6/30/2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: January 30, 2018.
Katia Kroutil,
Office Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-02095 Filed 2-1-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: June 14, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 113)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33505-33506]
[DOCID:fr14jn10-6]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2010-0447]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Teche Bayou, Morbihan, LA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation governing the operation of the
LA 44 swing span bridge across Teche Bayou, mile 56.7, at Morbihan,
Iberia Parish, Louisiana. The deviation is necessary to jack and shim
the bridge and to install a new roller wedge system. This deviation
allows the bridge to remain closed to navigation for three consecutive
weeks.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 6:30 a.m. on Monday, June 21
through 6:30 a.m. on Tuesday, August 3, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0447 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0447 in the
``Keyword'' box and then clicking ``Search''. They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or e-mail Kay Wade, Bridge Administration Branch, Coast Guard;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Louisiana Department of Transportation
and Development has requested a temporary deviation from the operating
schedule of the swing span bridge across Teche Bayou at mile 56.7 in
Morbihan, Iberia Parish, Louisiana. The closure is necessary in order
to rehabilitate machinery parts on the bridge. The work will require
the bridge to be jacked up and taken out of service. This maintenance
is essential for the continued operation of the bridge.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.501(a)(18), the swing span of the
bridge shall open on signal if at least 4 hours notice is given. This
deviation allows the swing span of the bridge to remain closed to
navigation for three consecutive weeks between 6:30 a.m. Monday, June
21 and 6:30 a.m. Tuesday, August 3, 2010. Uncontrollable variables such
as material supply delays and inclement weather make it difficult to
predict the exact dates that work can be conducted. Thus, the exact
dates for the closure cannot be firmly scheduled. Notices will be
published in the Eighth Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners
and will be broadcast via the Coast Guard Broadcast Notice to Mariners
System as soon as information pertaining to the exact closure dates
becomes available. The Coast Guard will coordinate the closure with the
commercial users of the waterway as exact closure dates are known.
    The vertical clearance of the swing span bridge in the closed-to-
navigation position is 6.12 feet above Mean high Water Elevation 5.7
feet Mean Sea Level. Navigation on the waterway consists of tugs with
tows, ship fabricator's commissioned vessels, crew boats and oil field
support/service vessels. The bridge opens for the passage of navigation
an average of 26 times per month. There are no alternate waterway
routes available. Due to prior experience and coordination with
waterway users, it has been determined that this closure will not have
a significant effect on these vessels.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the designated
time period. This deviation from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: June 2, 2010.
David M. Frank,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-14145 Filed 6-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 50673]
[FR Doc No: 2022-17659]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 34672; File No. 812-15349]

Varagon Capital Corporation, et al.

August 11, 2022.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'').

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of application for an order (``Order'') under sections 17(d)
and 57(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') and rule
17d-1 under the Act to permit certain joint transactions otherwise
prohibited by sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the Act and rule 17d-1
under the Act.

SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants request an order to amend a previous
order granted by the Commission that permits certain business
development companies (``BDCs'') and closed-end management investment
companies to co-invest in portfolio companies with each other and with
certain affiliated investment entities.

APPLICANTS: Varagon Capital Corporation, VCC Advisors, LLC, Varagon
Capital Partners, L.P., Varagon Structured Notes Issuer, LLC, VCAP
Cayman (L), L.P., VCAP Cayman (L) SPV-1, L.P., VCAP Cayman (U), L.P.,
VCP Holding I, L.P., VCP Holding II, L.P., VIVA Fund I, L.P., VCC
Equity Holdings, LLC, and VCC Funding, LLC.

FILING DATES:  The application was filed on June 15, 2022, and amended
on August 8, 2022.

HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING:  An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing on any application by emailing
the SEC's Secretary at [email protected] and serving the
Applicants with a copy of the request by email, if an email address is
listed for the relevant Applicant below, or personally or by mail, if a
physical address is listed for the relevant Applicant below. Hearing
requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on,
September 6, 2022, and should be accompanied by proof of service on
applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate
of service. Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should
state the nature of the writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the
desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason for the request,
and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing
may request notification by emailing the Commission's Secretary at
[email protected].

ADDRESSES: The Commission: [email protected]. Applicants: Afsar
Farman-Farmaian, Esq., Varagon Capital Corporation, at [email protected], and Steven B. Boehm, Esq., Payam Siadatpour,
Esq., and Anne G. Oberndorf, Esq., Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, at
[email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kaitlin C. Bottock, Branch Chief, at
(202) 551-6825 (Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's
Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For Applicants' representations, legal
analysis, and conditions, please refer to Applicants' first amended and
restated application, dated August 8, 2022, which may be obtained via
the Commission's website by searching for the file number at the top of
this document, or for an Applicant using the Company name search field,
on the SEC's EDGAR system. The SEC's EDGAR system may be searched at,
http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/legacy/companysearch.html. You may
also call the SEC's Public Reference Room at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under
delegated authority.

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-17659 Filed 8-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7728-7733]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02657]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R02-OAR-2020-0438; FRL-9315-02-R2]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
United States Virgin Islands; Regional Haze Federal Implementation
Plan; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 22, 2012, the EPA published a final rule in the
Federal Register promulgating a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to
address regional haze obligations for the Territory of the United
States Virgin Islands. However, at that time, EPA erroneously failed to
incorporate into the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) certain emission
limits that had been determined to be necessary to satisfy those
obligations and that had been proposed and included in the docket for
the action. EPA is correcting this error by incorporating the
previously noticed limits into the CFR. EPA has not reopened any of the
previous, underlying determinations in this action.

DATES: This final rule is effective on March 14, 2022.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID Number EPA-R02-OAR-2020-0438. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically through https://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Omar Hammad, Air Planning Section,
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
New York 10007-1866,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
    The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section is arranged as follows:

Table of Contents:

I. What is the background for the action?
II. What comments were received in response to the EPA's proposed
correction?
III. What action is the EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What is the background for this action?

    On February 19, 2021 (86 FR 10227), the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in which
the EPA proposed to make a technical correction adding into the CFR the
inadvertently omitted Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) table
containing the potential to emit (PTE) limits necessary to satisfy the
Virgin Islands' BART obligation.
    On October 22, 2012, EPA published a final rule promulgating a
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address regional haze obligations
for the Territory of the United States Virgin Islands. (77 FR 64414).
EPA determined that certain emission limits for sources of visibility
impairing pollutants in the Virgin Islands were necessary to satisfy
the requirements of the Clean Air Act and EPA's rules concerning
progress towards the national goal of preventing any future and
remedying any existing man-made impairment of visibility in mandatory
Class I areas (also referred to as the ``regional haze program''). In
that action, however, EPA erroneously failed to incorporate into the
CFR certain emission limits that had been noticed in the proposed rule
(77 FR 37842, June 25, 2012) and which were included in docket EPA-R02-
OAR-2012-0457 accompanying that proposed rule.\1\ Specifically, EPA had
determined that no additional controls were needed to satisfy the Best
Available Retrofit Technology (BART) requirement of the Regional Haze
Rule, and therefore that the subject-to-BART units' existing PTE limits
would be incorporated into the Virgin Islands' FIP. See 77 FR 37856.
EPA is now making a technical correction to incorporate the table
containing the PTE limits necessary to satisfy the Virgin Islands' BART
obligation into the CFR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Document ID EPA-R02-OAR-2012-0457-0007 and EPA-R02-OAR-2012-
0457-0008 in docket EPA-R02-OAR-2012-0457.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This rule does not reopen the previous determination that the PTE
limits contained in the docket for the 2012 final rule represent BART
for the units determined to be subject-to-BART; this action merely
corrects an inadvertent omission in a previous rulemaking. This
correction is not intended to address current or changed circumstances
at the subject-to-BART units, but merely clarifies what was intended to
be included in the CFR pursuant to the 2012 FIP.

II. What comments were received in response to the EPA's proposed
correction?

    In response to the EPA's February 19, 2021 proposed correction of
the Virgin Islands' FIP, the EPA received comments from one commenter,
Limetree Bay Refining, LLC and Limetree Bay Terminals, LLC (together
``Limetree'' or ``the commenter'') and is providing responses to the
comments that were received. The specific

comments may be viewed under Docket ID Number EPA-R02-OAR-2019-0674 on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
    Comment 1: The commenter argues that correcting the erroneously
omitted BART Measures by adding the provisions to the CFR is not a
technical correction and that it imposes new limits. The commenter
asserts that, even if EPA had some intention of promulgating such
limits in 2012 when it promulgated the Federal Implementation Plan
(FIP) to address regional haze in the Virgin Islands, it did not do so.
The commenter contends that the proposed rule would therefore, for the
first time, impose BART emission limitations on the Limetree facility.
    To be effective and enforceable, commenter states, the promulgation
of the proposed limits must comply with public notice and comment
requirements. The commenter maintains that the 2012 Proposed Rule
described various proposed BART determinations for sources in the
Virgin Islands that may be subject to BART, but did not propose
measures to translate those determinations into enforceable
limitations.
    The commenter asserts that the enforceable language now proposed by
the EPA is nowhere to be found in the 2012 rulemaking record, neither
in the Proposed Rule or Final Rule, nor in any docketed supporting
document.
    Response: This rule does not reopen the previous determination that
the PTE limits contained in the docket for the 2012 final rule
represent BART for the units determined to be subject-to-BART. This
action merely corrects an inadvertent omission in a previous rulemaking
in which EPA intended to, but did not, include those PTE limits in the
Virgin Islands' FIP. Included in the 2012 FIP docket, EPA-R02-OAR-2012,
are two documents that include the PTE limits for HOVENSA, EPA-R02-OAR-
2012-007 and EPA-R02-OAR-2012-008. These limits represented current
operations at the time and were determined to constitute BART in the
2012 FIP.
    The commenter is correct that inserting the inadvertently omitted
BART Measures, specifically the emission limitations for
SO2, NOX, and PM, into the CFR are the first
codification of these requirements. However, the commenter is incorrect
that those limits were absent from the 2012 rulemaking record and that
EPA did not intend to put these limits in the FIP in 2012. See 77 FR
37842, 37856. To the contrary, the administrative record documents
EPA's intention for emission limitations and specifically references
the applicability to the commenter's facility. At page 37856 of the
final rule, EPA asserts, ``[a]s such, EPA's Federal plan includes the
establishment of emission limits for SO2, NOX,
and PM equivalent to the potential to emit (PTE) for each unit subject
to BART, as derived from HOVENSA's permit limit conditions.'' BART is
defined in EPA's regulations as an emission limit, 40 CFR 51.301. It is
not possible to satisfy the BART requirements without including an
emission limit reflecting the BART determination(s) in the applicable
implementation plan (in this case, in the Virgin Islands' FIP). See
also 40 CFR 51.308(e)(2) (``The State must submit an implementation
plan containing emission limitations representing BART. . . .''). The
commenter's contention that EPA did not intend to promulgate emission
limits in the FIP reflecting the BART determinations implies that EPA
did not intend to satisfy the BART requirement for the source and is
therefore clearly incorrect. Additionally, the BART emission limits
merely reflect preexisting (as of 2012) PTE limits to which the units
were already subject. Therefore, while this action will put the limits
in the FIP for the first time, it does not represent the first time the
source has had to comply with the relevant limits.
    This technical correction remedies the inadvertent omission of the
BART limits in the CFR. EPA provided opportunity for public comment on
its determination that the subject-to-BART units' existing PTE limits
represented BART in the 2012 FIP rule making. See 77 FR 37842, 37856
(June 25, 2012). The agency further provided an opportunity for public
comment on whether the PTE limits contained in the notice of proposed
rulemaking for this action were the limits EPA determined to be BART in
2012. 86 FR 10227, 10227 (Feb. 19, 2021). EPA has thus provided public
notice of and an opportunity to comment on the limits it is
incorporating into the Virgin Islands' FIP.
    Comment 2: The commenter states that EPA Region 2 did not work with
Limetree to coordinate these limits. The commenter asserts that EPA
also does not explain how ``maximum transparency'' was served by its
failure to provide Limetree, the sole affected party, any notice of
this proposal prior to its publication in the Federal Register.
    Response: EPA is not proposing to change or reopen the BART
determinations made in the 2012 FIP that were based on emission limits
that were already in place for HOVENSA at the time. EPA provided
opportunity for public comment on the already established BART in the
2012 FIP rulemaking. See 77 FR 37842, 37856 (June 25, 2012). EPA is
merely making a technical correction that takes those same PTE limits,
which were determined to be then-current operations, and codifies those
limits in the CFR. This rulemaking does not revisit or change the 2012
determinations, which were made pursuant to a notice and comment
rulemaking process. See 77 FR 37842, 37856. HOVENSA, and others,
commented during that rulemaking. See 77 FR 64414, 64415-20.
    With respect to commenter's statement that it did not receive any
notice of this proposal prior to its publication in the Federal
Register, consistent with CAA Section 307(d) and general rulemaking
processes, the proposal being finalized by this action, on which the
commenter commented, was the advance notice. The proposal included the
establishment of a rulemaking docket and provided for the acceptance of
written comments, data, or other documents from ``any person.''
    Comment 3: The commenter argues that it is clear from the record
that the omission of any enforceable limits was not inadvertent, but
rather EPA's intent was to promulgate the restart notice requirement at
40 CFR 52.2781(d)(4) in lieu of any specific BART limitations. The
commenter asserts that the restart notice procedure is the appropriate
mechanism for EPA to determine whether the FIP should be revised, and
any revision is required to be promulgated through full notice and
comment procedures. The commenter states that the proposed
``correction'' fails to meet the process required by 40 CFR.
52.2718(d)(4).
    Response: The restart notice requirement pertains to the reasonable
progress requirements, not to BART. The commentor is erroneously
conflating BART with reasonable progress. The commenter is incorrect
that the restart notice requirement was intended to be in lieu of BART.
See 77 FR 37842.
    The commenter conflates two distinct sets of regional haze
requirements: Reasonable progress and BART. States' regional haze
implementation plans are required to include BART emission limits
pursuant to 40 CFR 51.308(e). EPA made BART determinations and intended
to promulgate BART limits, which were to be equivalent to existing PTE
limits for the subject-to-BART sources, in the FIP. 77 FR 37856. The
passages from EPA's rulemaking cited by commenter refer to EPA's

determinations and requirements pursuant to a different set of
regulatory requirements, i.e., the requirements for determining the
measures in addition to BART that are necessary to make reasonable
progress. Reasonable progress is governed by the requirements of 40 CFR
51.308(d). The restart notice requirement pertains to the reasonable
progress. See 40 CFR 52.2781(d)(4) (upon receiving startup notification
and information from the source, ``EPA will revise the FIP as
necessary, after public notice and comment, in accordance with the
regional haze requirements including the `reasonable progress'
provisions in 40 CFR 51.308(d)(1).'') (emphasis added).
    Unrelated to the technical correction in this action, in a letter
dated June 10, 2019, EPA responded to Limetree's restart notice, dated
June 2, 2019, explaining that, upon restart, the 2012 FIP requires the
EPA to assess whether additional control measures are warranted to meet
regional haze requirements, including the ``reasonable progress''
provisions in 40 CFR 51.308(d)(l). 40 CFR 52.2782(d)(3)-(4). Limetree
will be consulted and included in the process of assessing whether new
control measures are warranted upon restart.
    As explained in the response to the first comment, above, in the
2012 FIP, EPA determined that current operations, PTE limits at the
time, represented BART. EPA determined BART for each BART-eligible
source using the methodology in the Guidelines for Best Available
Control Retrofit Technology (BART) Determinations under the Regional
Haze Rules, 40 CFR part 51, Appendix Y. This action proposes to correct
the EPA's failure to codify in the CFR the PTE limits that constituted
current operations at the time and were determined to represent BART in
the 2012 FIP.
    Comment 4: The commenter objects to the ``arbitrary and extremely
limited scope'' of comments that EPA will allow, allowing comment on
the narrow issue of whether the limits in the correction are the limits
that EPA determined to be BART in the 2012 action. Limetree questions
how this serves EPA's stated goal of ``maximum transparency.'' The
commenter states that EPA must then provide reasonable opportunity to
comment on the full scope of the proposed rule, including whether any
proposed limits represent BART for units determined to be subject-to-
BART.
    Response: As explained in the response to the first comment, above,
EPA is not reopening any determinations previously made in its 2012
FIP. The scope of this action is not to revisit the BART determination
itself, but to merely make the technical correction of adding the
emission limit reflecting the existing BART determination to the CFR.
EPA determined in 2012 that current operations, PTE limits at the time,
represented BART. EPA determined BART for each BART-eligible source
using the methodology in the Guidelines for Best Available Control
Retrofit Technology (BART) Determinations under the Regional Haze
Rules, 40 CFR part 51, Appendix Y. EPA sought public comment on the
BART determinations and thus satisfied the notice-and-comment
requirement in the 2012 proposed rule. 77 FR 37857. Today's action is
simply to put the emission limits reflecting the already-finalized BART
determinations in the FIP. It is reasonable for EPA to limit the scope
of comment consistent with the scope of the action being taken.
    Comment 5: Limetree states that it objects to EPA not considering
current conditions and changed circumstances. Limetree asserts that
previous BART determinations are no longer reliable, and alternatives
are conceivable.
    Response: This action is merely to correct an error made in 2012,
when EPA intended to put the source's preexisting emission limits in
the FIP. The BART limits are intended to reflect the determination that
was made based on the circumstances that existed in 2012. As expressed
in EPA's 2012 rulemaking, current conditions and changed circumstances
will be considered in the context of determining whether any additional
measures, on top of the BART emission limits, are necessary pursuant to
the reasonable progress requirements. See 40 CFR 52.2781(d)(3) and (4);
77 FR 37850. Limetree will be consulted in any future planning for
regional haze that impacts the source, which is a matter beyond the
scope of this technical correction.
    If Limetree has made any significant modifications or changes to
any units, that is not within the scope of this technical correction.
This technical correction merely takes the HOVENSA BART determinations
established in the 2012 FIP and codifies the same determinations in the
CFR. Any restarts, changes, modifications, or reconfigurations in
operation will be addressed through the restart notice steps and the
separate reasonable progress requirements. The reconfiguration of the
facility is not the subject of this action which merely corrects an
omission in the 2012 FIP.
    Comment 6: The commenter states that BART limits would affect
operations of the refinery, which was recently reconfigured at
considerable expense in reliance upon the existing regulatory
requirements and the utility of its permits.
    The commenter maintains that EPA must specifically allow comment on
the reliance interests that arise with changed circumstances, as well
as the policy considerations addressing this issue that EPA is required
to identify in a proposed rule. The commenter asserts that the FIP has
been in place since 2012, yet not only does the proposed rule fail to
assess the relevant reliance interests, it also fails to consider any
alternative courses of action. According to the commenter, alternatives
are thus plainly conceivable and, under the Supreme Court's DACA
decision, EPA is required to assess them.
    Response: Although the commenter is correct that the Virgin
Islands' FIP promulgated in 2012 did not contain emission limits
reflecting BART, the refinery was nonetheless subject to those same
emission limits by virtue of their existence in the source's
preexisting permits. See 77 FR 37856 (Federal plan was to include
emission limits ``equivalent to the potential to emit (PTE) for each
unit subject to BART, as derived from HOVENSA's permit limit
conditions''). It therefore is not clear how simply codifying the same
limits in an additional instrument would necessitate a change in the
source's operations. That is, it is not clear how this action
implicates Limetree's reliance interests. The commenter has offered no
factual support for the assertion that it relied on the absence of BART
limits in the Virgin Islands' FIP and that incorporating those limits
now would significantly affect the utility of the sources' permits.
Moreover, the commenter fails to explain how it has a reliance interest
in a clerical error made by the agency, particularly where it was clear
from the record for the 2012 rule that EPA intended to impose BART
limits on this source.
    The commenter alleges that U.S. Department of Homeland Security et
al. v. Regents of the University of California et al., 140 S.Ct. 1891
(2020) has application to the instant rulemaking because the
inadvertent omission of a regulatory provision has allegedly resulted
in the commenter relying on a false perception that no BART emission
limitations were in place for the HOVENSA facility. The potential
existence of BART alternatives is not under consideration because any
rational analysis of the 2012 rulemaking

would indicate that the previously applied limitations were to be
continued but were (as reiterated throughout) erroneously omitted.
    As explained above, to the extent the source's operations have
changed since 2012, it was and continues to be EPA's intent to address
any changes in circumstances via the process laid out in 40 CFR
52.2781(d)(4) as appropriate. It is clear, however, that EPA intended
to include BART emission limitations for the source in the FIP in 2012
and that such limits should have applied starting at that time.

III. What action is the EPA taking?

    The EPA is finalizing a technical correction to incorporate the
erroneously omitted table containing the PTE limits necessary to
satisfy the Virgin Islands' BART obligation into the CFR.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action under the terms
of Executive Order 12866 and was, therefore, not submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. This final rule is a
technical correction.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the PRA. Under the PRA, a ``collection of
information'' is defined as a requirement for ``answers to * * *
identical reporting or recordkeeping requirements imposed on ten or
more persons * * *.'' 44 U.S.C. 3502(3)(A). The action does not impose
any new obligations or new enforcement duties on any state, local or
tribal government or the private sector. This final rule is a technical
correction.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In
making this determination, EPA concludes that the impact of concern for
this rule is any significant adverse economic impact on small entities
and that the agency is certifying that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
if the rule has no net burden on the small entities subject to the
rule. This action merely adds the erroneously omitted table to the CFR,
it does not change any determination included in the FIP. We have
therefore concluded that this action will have no net regulatory burden
for all directly regulated small entities.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandates, as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local or tribal government or the private sector.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. It will not have substantial direct effects on
tribal governments. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this
rule.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is
not economically significant as defined in Executive Order 12866, and
because the EPA does not believe the environmental health or safety
risks addressed by this action present a disproportionate risk to
children.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Through this action, the EPA is adding the erroneously omitted table to
the CFR; it does not change any determination included in the FIP. This
action does not remove any of the prior rule's environmental or
procedural protections.

K. Congress Review Act (CRA)

    This rule is exempt from the CRA because it is a rule of particular
applicability.

L. Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by April 11, 2022. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. See CAA section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.

Michael S. Regan,
Administrator.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart CCC--Virgin Islands

0
2. In Sec.  52.2781 paragraph (d)(5) is added to read as follows:

Sec.  52.2781  Visibility protection.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (5) Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) measures. Emissions
limitations, the owners/operators subject to this section shall not
emit or cause to be emitted SO2, NOX, and PM in
excess of the following limitations:

                                                               Table 1 to Paragraph (d)(5)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                BART controls/limits
                                                                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Facility                           BART unit                                           SO2 (tons/      NOX (tons/
                                                                               Control              year)           year)            PM (tons/year)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOVENSA....................  Boilers:
                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                1 (B-1151)...........................  ......................           330.1           450.6  40.6.
                                3 (B-1153)...........................  ......................           330.1           450.6  40.6.
                                4 (B-1154)...........................  ......................           322.5           443.5  39.7.
                                5 (B-1155)...........................  ......................           484.9           676.9  60.7.
                                6 (B-3301)...........................  ......................           330.8           435.3  40.6.
                                7 (B-3302)...........................  ......................           330.8           435.3  40.6.
                                8 (B-3303)...........................  ......................           640.1           559.8  78.6.
                                9 (B-3304)...........................  ......................           640.1           559.8  78.6.
                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Turbines:
                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                GT1 (G-1101E)........................  ......................           135.5           805.7  12.2.
                                GT2 (G-1101F)........................  ......................           135.5           805.7  12.2.
                                GT3 (G-1101G)........................  ......................           135.5           805.7  12.2.
                                GT4 (G-3404).........................  ......................           161.0           809.5  12.9.
                                GT5 (G-3405).........................  ......................           161.0           766.5  12.9.
                                GT6 (G-3406).........................  ......................           161.0           766.5  12.9.
                                GT7 (G-3407).........................  ......................           161.0           766.5  12.9.
                                GT8 (G-3408).........................  ......................           167.6          1002.1  15.1.
                                GT9 (G-3409).........................  Steam Injection for               52.2           150.2  14.0.
                                                                        NOX Control.
                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Process Heaters:
                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                H-101................................  ......................           155.5           232.5  19.3.
                                H-104................................  ......................           115.5           172.8  17.2.
                                H-200................................  ......................             8.1            16.0  1.2.
                                H-201................................  ......................             8.2            16.1  1.2.
                                H-202................................  ......................            26.6           146.5  4.0.
                                H-401A...............................  ......................           197.6           279.1  24.4.
                                H-401B...............................  ......................           197.6           279.1  24.4.
                                H-401C...............................  ......................           197.6           279.1  24.4.
                                H-1401A..............................  ......................           163.1           388.7  21.1.
                                H-1401B..............................  ......................           155.4           370.2  20.1.
                                H-1500...............................  ......................            13.0            25.5  2.0.
                                H-1501...............................  ......................            13.7            26.8  2.0.
                                H-160................................  ......................            29.6           163.0  4.4.
                                H-600................................  ......................            11.5            22.5  1.7.
                                H-601................................  ......................             7.8            15.2  1.2.
                                H-602................................  ......................            62.6           344.4  9.4.
                                H-603................................  ......................            17.2            33.7  2.6.
                                H-604................................  ......................             8.1            15.9  1.2.
                                H-605................................  ......................             3.4             6.6  0.5.
                                H-606................................  ......................            11.8            23.1  1.8.
                                H-800A...............................  ......................             9.4            18.4  1.4.
                                H-800B...............................  ......................             9.4            18.4  1.4.
                                H-801................................  ......................            22.0           121.1  3.3.
                                H-2101...............................  ......................           116.4           283.2  15.1.
                                H-2102...............................  ......................           112.7           274.1  14.6.
                                H-2201A..............................  ......................            13.4            26.3  2.0.
                                H-2201B..............................  ......................            13.4            26.3  2.0.
                                H-2202...............................  ......................            26.1           143.7  3.9.
                                H-2400...............................  ......................             7.2            14.2  1.1.
                                H-2401...............................  ......................            24.1           132.5  3.6.
                                H-2501...............................  ......................            44.5           244.5  6.7.
                                H-4502...............................  ......................            32.5           178.9  4.9.
                                H-4503...............................  ......................            30.8           169.6  4.6.
                                H-4504...............................  ......................            27.6           151.9  4.1.
                                H-4505...............................  ......................            23.9           131.3  3.6.
                                H-3101A..............................  ......................           356.7           507.1  48.1.
                                H-3101B..............................  ......................           356.7           507.1  48.1.
                                H-4101A..............................  ......................           356.7           507.1  48.1.
                                H-4101B..............................  ......................           356.7           507.1  48.1.
                                H-4401...............................  ......................            29.4           161.5  4.4.
                                H-4402...............................  ......................            28.0           153.8  4.2.
                                H-4451...............................  ......................            83.4           458.7  12.5.
                                H-4452...............................  ......................            54.3           298.6  8.1.
                                H-4453...............................  ......................            54.3           298.6  8.1.
                                H-4454...............................  ......................            16.9            33.1  2.5.

                                H-4455...............................  ......................            30.3           166.6  4.5.
                                H-4201...............................  ......................           367.7           448.1  44.9.
                                H-4202...............................  ......................           355.7           433.6  43.4.
                                H-5401...............................  ......................            29.4           161.5  4.4.
                                H-5402...............................  ......................              28           153.8  4.2.
                                H-5451...............................  ......................            83.4           458.7  12.5.
                                H-5452...............................  ......................            54.3           298.6  8.1.
                                H-5453...............................  ......................            54.3           298.6  8.1.
                                H-5454...............................  ......................            16.9            33.1  2.5.
                                H-5455...............................  ......................            30.3           166.6  4.5.
                                H-4601A..............................  ......................            13.4            26.3  2.
                                H-4601B..............................  ......................            13.4            26.3  2.
                                H-4602...............................  ......................            26.1           143.7  3.9.
                                H-4301A..............................  ......................            14.6            28.7  2.2.
                                H-4301B..............................  ......................            14.6            28.7  2.2.
                                H-4302...............................  ......................            26.7           147.1  4.
                                H-5301A..............................  ......................            14.6            28.7  2.2.
                                H-5301B..............................  ......................            14.6            28.7  2.2.
                                H-5302...............................  ......................            26.7           147.1  4.
                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             TGT unit No. 2 Beavo:
                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                H-4761 & T-4761......................  ......................             2.0             4.0  1.0.
                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             TGI units:
                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                H-1032...............................  ......................             1.6             3.1  0.2.
                                H-1042...............................  ......................             3.3             6.5  0.5.
                                H-4745...............................  ......................           900.0            28.0  3.0.
                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Compressors:
                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                C-200A...............................  Catalytic Converters               0.0            33.1  0.2.
                                                                        for NOX and CO
                                                                        control.
                                C-200B...............................  Catalytic Converters               0.0            33.1  0.2.
                                                                        for NOX and CO
                                                                        control.
                                C-200C...............................  Catalytic Converters               0.0            33.1  0.2.
                                                                        for NOX and CO
                                                                        control.
                                C-1500A..............................  ......................             0.0            40.0  0.1.
                                C-1500B..............................  ......................             0.0            40.0  0.1.
                                C-1500C..............................  ......................             0.0            40.0  0.1.
                                C-2400A..............................  Catalytic Converters               0.0            19.4  0.3.
                                                                        for NOx and CO
                                                                        control.
                                C-2400B..............................  Catalytic Converters               0.0            19.4  0.3.
                                                                        for NOX and CO
                                                                        control.
                                C-4601A..............................  ......................             0.0           380.6  0.9.
                                C-4601B..............................  ......................             0.0           380.6  0.9.
                                C-4601C..............................  ......................             0.0           380.6  0.9.
                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Flares:
                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                #2 Flare (H-1105)....................  ......................           150.0           237.0  negligible.
                                #3 Flare (H-1104)....................  ......................           150.0           237.0  negligible.
                                #5 Flare (H-3351)....................  ......................           150.0           237.0  negligible.
                                #6 Flare (H-3352)....................  ......................           150.0           237.0  negligible.
                                #7 Flare (H-3301)....................  ......................           150.0           237.0  negligible.
                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Water Pumps:
                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                PD-1602..............................  ......................             1.9            40.6  2.9.
                                PD-1603..............................  ......................             1.9            40.6  2.9.
                                PD-1604..............................  ......................             1.9            40.6  2.9.
                                PD-1605..............................  ......................             1.9            40.6  2.9.
                                PD-1620..............................  ......................             1.3            27.0  1.9.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-02657 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10073]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4078]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday,
February 24, 2011 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday,
February 24, 2011 will be:

    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 17, 2011.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-4078 Filed 2-18-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P