SDC 0002 007 HB 2011B April 21, 2000 Calculated Attribute Definition Calculation Who Calculates Where Calculated Where Stored Sampling Period ( for Initial and Final Sampling Plans) Assigned sampling period for initial and final monitoring plans. If Initial Monitoring Period, Then 0; ELSE 19. Extraction Utility Design,

Plant Design Utility Design,

Plant Design Total Population Served Total population served by the utility. Sum Wholesale Population and Retail Population. Extraction Utility Monthly Utility Monthly Population Size Category Size category for systems based on total population served. See Exhibit 5 of this Document. Extraction Utility Monthly Utility Monthly Average Percent Solids The average percent solids reported by a utility over the monitoring period. Average (% Solids) reported for however many months of data are available. Extraction Plant Monthly Plant Design Geographic Region of the Plant EPA Region for the plant. See Exhibit 4 of this Document. Extraction Plant Design Plant Design Hydrologic Unit Code ( HUC) Standardized code for water resource identification. EPA will define this algorithm. Extraction Plant Design Plant Design Process Train Name Name of the unit process train where samples are collected. If Any Sample Number for Process Train = VALUE,

then select information for this process train. Extraction Plant Design Plant Design Sludge Handling Capacity in dry tons/ day Sludge Handling and Disposal design capacity in dry tons/ day. See Section 2.2.4 of this Document. Extraction Plant Design Plant Design Surface Water Resource Category Characterization of the type of surface water used for those plants characterized as " SW." For all Source Water Category = SW; Step 0.

Calculate the total SW Flow, mgd = FS Flow + RL Flow + GWUDI Flow + NF Flow. Step 1. Calculate the % of SW Flow from FS, RL, GWUDI, and NF. Step 2. If FS% > 80%, then " FS;" If RL% > 80%, then " RL;" If GWUDI% > 80%, then " GWUDI;" If NF% > 80%, then " NF;" ELSE " MIX." Extraction Plant Design,

Plant Monthly Plant Design,

Plant Monthly Water Resource Category Characterization of the source type being used by plants and trains. Step 1. Calculate % of total plant flow from Flow Stream, Res/ Lake, GWUDI, GW, NonFresh, Purchased.

Step 2. Calculate the SW Percentage = Sum of FS, RL,

GWUDI, NonFresh. Step 3. IF SW %> 80%, then " SW;" if GW% > 80%, then " GW;" If Purchased% >

80%, then " PUR;" ELSE " MIX." Extraction Plant Design,

Plant Monthly Plant Design,

Plant Monthly Chlorine Demand Initial chlorine demand of the source water. If ( Free Chlorine Residual >= 0.2 mg/ L and <= 1.5 mg/ L) and ( Contact Time <= 10 min), then (( Total Chlorine Dose)  ( Total Chlorine Residual)); ELSE Missing Value. Extraction Plant Monthly Plant Monthly Distribution System Disinfectant Type Characterization of the disinfectant used in the distribution system. If any Unit Process = DIS is " NH3," then " CLM;" if no Unit Process = DIS is " NH3" and at least 1 other Unit Process has a dose > than 0, then CL2; ELSE " Null." Extraction Plant Monthly Plant Monthly E 1 SDC 0002 007 HB 2011B April 21, 2000 Calculated Attribute Definition Calculation Who Calculates Where Calculated Where Stored Plant Disinfection Type Categorical descriptive of disinfection practices in the treatment plant. If Unit Process=" DIS"=" O3" and Dose = Nonzero, then O3; If Unit Process = " DIS" = " CLX " and Dose =

Nonzero, then CLX; ELSE IF ALL Unit Process with sequence numbers less than the sequence number associated with the last unit process having a liquid volume greater than zero = " DIS" = " CL2" or " SOY,"

then CL2; If the first Unit Process = " DIS" = " NH3," then CLM; If the second Unit Process = " DIS" =" NH3" and no upstream Unit Process has a Volume> 0, then " CLM;"

If there is no sampled process train or the influent flow is null or if all of the disinfectant addition unit processes with sequence numbers less than the sequence number associated with the last unit process having a liquid volume greater than zero have doses equal to zero, then " Null;" ELSE CL2+ CLM. Extraction Plant Monthly Plant Monthly Process Train Name Name of the process train selected. Select Process Train if Sampled; If more than one train is sampled, then Select the Process Train with the largest flow at the time of sampling for the first unit process. If the flows are equal, sort the process train name alphabetically and select the first process trian. Extraction Plant Monthly Plant Monthly Overall Plant Baffling Factor Aggregated average baffling factor ( ratio of T10 to T50) across all unit processes. [ SUM( T10) for all unit processes] / [ SUM( T50) for all unit processes]. Extraction Unit Process Plant Monthly Aluminum based Coagulant Dose Total applied dose of aluminum based metal acid coagulants as mg/ L Aluminum. Sum all Chemical Feed Dosages where the Chemical Feed Name is " ALUM." Extraction Unit Process

Chem Feed Plant Monthly Iron based Coagulant Dose Total applied dose of iron based metal acid coagulants as mg/ L iron. Sum all Chemical Feed Dosages where the Chemical Feed Name = " IRON." Extraction Unit Process

Chem Feed Plant Monthly Coagulant Type Metal coagulant type applied at the plant. If Aluminum based> 0 and Iron based> 0, then " MIX;"

ELSE IF Aluminum based > 0, then " AL;" ELSE IF Ironbased > 0, then " IRON;" ELSE NULL. Extraction Unit Process

Chem Feed Plant Monthly Sludge Solids Production Capacity in dry ton/ day Sludge production quantity normalized to dry tons/ day. See Section 2.2.7 of this Document. Extraction Plant Monthly Plant Monthly E 2 SDC 0002 007 HB 2011B April 21, 2000 Calculated Attribute Definition Calculation Who Calculates Where Calculated Where Stored Wastewater Return Treatment Type Overall type of treatment provided for the washwater return supply. If WWR Plain Sed = WWR Coag/ Sed = WWR Filt =

WWR Dis = WWR Other = " N," then " NONE;" ELSE IF ONLY WWR Plain Sed = WWR Coag/ Sed = " Y," then " SETTLE;" ELSE IF ONLY WWR Filt = " Y," then " FILT;" ELSE IF ONLY WWR Filt = " Y" and WWR Coag/ Sed = " Y," then " CONV;" ELSE IF ONLY WWR DIS = " Y," then " DIS;" ELSE IF ONLY WWR Coag/ Sed = " Y" and WWR Filt = " Y" and WWR Dis =

" Y," then " CONV_ DIS;" ELSE " OTHER." Extraction Plant Monthly Plant Monthly Sample Event Name Name of the sample point represented. Influent Samples = " INFLUENT;" Through the

Plant= Associated Unit Process Name; Finished Water = " FINISH;" Distribution System = Location Name. Extraction Sample Event Sample Event Sample Event Type Type of location represented by the sample point. Influent Samples = " INFLUENT;" Through the Plant = Associated Unit Process Type Code; Finished Water = " FINISH;" Distribution System = Location Type. Extraction Sample Event Sample Event Sample Event Identification Unique code to identify sampling events in a plant. Composition of Plant ID, Sample Location, and Sample Period: III LL PP. Extraction Sample Event Sample Event Sample Location Sequence Number Numerical sequence of sampling location represented through the plant. FOR NONBLENDED SYSTEMS: Influent Samples =

0; Through the Plant = Associated Unit Process Sequence Number; Finished Water = Maximum Plant Sequence + 1; Distribution System Samples: DSE =

FW+ 1; Avg1 = FW+ 2; Avg2 = FW+ 3; Max = FW+ 4;

SDS= FW+ 5; First Customer= FW+ 6; FOR BLENDED SYSTEMS ONLY: Entry Point = 200;

Distribution System Samples ( for m plants):

DSE( i)= EP + 1 thru EP + m; Avg( i) = DSE( max) + 1 thru DSE( max) + 2* m; Max( i) = Avg( max) + 1 thru Avg( max) + m; SDS( i) = Max( max) + 1 thru Max( max)

+ m; First Customer( i) = SDS( max) + 1 thru SDS( max)

+ m. Extraction Sample Event Sample Event Sample Quarter Assigned quarter in which samples are collected. If Sample Period <= 3, then 1; ELSE IF Sample Period <= 6, then 2; ELSE IF Sample Period <= 9,. then 3; ELSE IF Sample Period <= 12, then 4; ELSE IF Sample Period <= 15, then 5; ELSE 6. Extraction Sample Event Sample Event E 3 SDC 0002 007 HB 2011B April 21, 2000 Calculated Attribute Definition Calculation Who Calculates Where Calculated Where Stored Total HAA5 Sample Value Total concentration of the following five haloacetic acid species: monochloroacetic acid ( MCAA), dichloroacetic acid ( DCAA),

trichloroacetic acid ( TCAA), monobromoacetic acid ( MBAA), dibromoacetic acid ( DBAA). Step1. Transform all below detection results to the MRL place holder ( e. g.,  999). Step 2. Sum concentrations ( ug/ L) of MCAA, DCAA, TCAA, MBAA, DBAA with data below MRL being set equal to zero. Extraction Sample Event

DBPs Sample Event

DBPs Total HAA6 Sample Value Total concentration of the following six haloacetic acid species: HAA5 +

bromochloroacetic acid ( BCAA). Step1. Transform all below detection results to the MRL place holder ( e. g.,  999). Step 2. Sum concentrations ( ug/ L) of MCAA, DCAA, TCAA, MBAA, DBAA,

BCAA with data below MRL being set equal to zero. Extraction Sample Event

DBPs Sample Event

DBPs Total HAA9 Sample Value Total concentration of the following nine haloacetic acid species: HAA6 +

bromodichloroacetic acid ( BDCAA),

dibromochloroacetic acid ( DBCAA),

tribromoacetic acid ( TBAA). Step1. Transform all below detection results to the MRL place holder ( e. g.,  999). Step 2. Sum concentrations ( ug/ L) of MCAA, DCAA, TCAA, MBAA, DBAA,

BCAA, BDCAA, DBCAA, TBAA with data below MRL being set equal to zero. Extraction Sample Event

DBPs Sample Event

DBPs Total Haloacetonitriles ( HAN4) Total concentraction for the following haloacetonitriles: dichloroacetonitrile ( DCNA),

trichloroacetonitrile ( TCAN),

bromochloroacetonitrile ( BCAN),

dibromoacetonitrile ( DBAN). Step1. Transform all below detection results to the MRL place holder ( e. g.,  999). Step 2. Sum concentrations ( ug/ L) of DCAN, TCAN, BCAN, DBAN with data below MRL being set equal to zero. Extraction Sample Event

DBPs Sample Event

DBPs Total THM Sample Value Total concentration of all trihalomethane species in sample: chloroform ( TCM),

bromodichloromethane ( BDCM),

dibromochloromethane ( DBCM), bromoform ( TBM). Step1. Transform all below detection results to the MRL place holder ( e. g.,  999). Step 2. Sum concentrations ( ug/ L) of TCM, BDCM, DBCM, TBM with data below MRL being set equal to zero. Extraction Sample Event

DBPs Sample Event

DBPs Chlorine Dioxide Residual Value Chlorine dioxide residual concentration corrected for an assigned MRL condition. If Value = 0.1 and the analyte comment <> " Null" or if Value = 0, then Value = 333; ELSE Value = Value. Extraction Sample Event

Residuals Sample Event

Residuals Expert Chlorine Dioxide Residual Value Chlorine dioxide residual concentration corrected for the sample specific detection limit. If Chlorine Dioxide Residual Value is  333, then expert value determined manually replace the  333 with either

999 if result is BDL or measured value noted in comment; Else, the Total CL2 Residual Value remains the same. Extraction Sample Event

Residuals Sample Event

Residuals Free CL2 Residual Value Free CL2 residual concentration corrected for an assigned MRL condition. If Value = 0.1 and the analyte comment <> " Null" or if Value = 0, then Value = 333; ELSE Value = Value. Extraction Sample Event

Residuals Sample Event

Residuals Expert Free CL2 Residual Value Free CL2 residual concentration corrected for the sample specific detection limit. If Free CL2 Value is  333, then expert value determined manually replace the  333 with either  999 if result is BDL or measured value noted in comment; Else, the Total CL2 Residual Value remains the same. Extraction Sample Event

Residuals Sample Event

Residuals E 4 SDC 0002 007 HB 2011B April 21, 2000 Calculated Attribute Definition Calculation Who Calculates Where Calculated Where Stored NH3 Sample Value NH3 sample concentration corrected for an assigned MRL condition. If Value = 0.1 and the analyte comment <> " Null" or if Value = 0, then Value = 333; ELSE Value = Value. Extraction Sample Event

Residuals Sample Event

Residuals Expert NH3 Sample Value NH3 sample concentration corrected for the sample specific detection limit. If Ammonia Sample Value is  333, then expert value determined manually replace the  333 with either  999 if result is BDL or measured value noted in comment; Else,

the Total CL2 Residual Value remains the same. Extraction Sample Event

Residuals Sample Event

Residuals Ozone Residual Value Ozone residual concentration corrected for an assigned MRL condition. If Value = 0.1 and the analyte comment <> " Null" or if Value = 0, then Value = 333; ELSE Value = Value. Extraction Sample Event

Residuals Sample Event

Residuals Expert Ozone Residual Value Ozone residual concentration corrected for the sample specific detection limit. If Ozone Residual Value is  333, then expert value determined manually replace the  333 with either  999 if result is BDL or measured value noted in comment; Else,

the Total CL2 Residual Value remains the same. Extraction Sample Event

Residuals Sample Event

Residuals Total CL2 Residual Value Total CL2 residual concentration corrected for an assigned MRL condition. If Value = 0.1 and the analyte comment <> " Null" or if Value = 0, then Value = 333; ELSE Value = Value. Extraction Sample Event

Residuals Sample Event

Residuals Expert Total CL2 Residual Value Total CL2 residual concentration corrected for the sample specific detection limit. If Total CL2 Residual Value is  333, then expert value determined manually replace the  333 with either  999 if result is BDL or measured value noted in comment; Else,

the Total CL2 Residual Value remains the same. Extraction Sample Event

Residuals Sample Event

Residuals Sample/ Analyte Comment Flag Identification flag for any utility Sample/ Analyte level comments. If any sample or analyte has an associated comment field, then 1; ELSE blank. Extraction Sample Event Entities  Associated Sample Event Entities  Associated Sample/ Analyte QA Flag Identification flag for any Utility Sample/ Analyte Level QA Codes as " Q." If any sample or analyte has an associated " Q" value in the Utility Sample QA Field, then 1; ELSE blank. Extraction Sample Event Entities  Associated Sample Event Entities  Associated Average TOC Sample Value Monthly average level of total organic carbon based on duplicate samples. Step 1. Transform all below detection results to numeric values equal to the MRL. Step 2. Average the transformed values of the duplicate sample results. Step 3. If the average= MRL, then extract as a  999 value;

ELSE extract average value. Extraction Sample Event

WQPs Sample Event

WQPs Average TOX Sample Value Monthly average level of total halogenated organics based on duplicate samples. Step 1. Transform all below detection results to numeric values equal to the MRL. Step 2. Average the transformed values of the duplicate sample results. Step 3. If the average= MRL, then extract as a  999 value;

ELSE extract average value. Extraction Sample Event

DBPs Sample Event

DBPs E 5 SDC 0002 007 HB 2011B April 21, 2000 Calculated Attribute Definition Calculation Who Calculates Where Calculated Where Stored Average UV254 Sample Value Monthly average level of UV254 based on duplicate samples. Step 1. Transform all below detection results to numeric values equal to the MRL. Step 2. Average the transformed values of the duplicate sample results. Step 3. If the average= MRL, then extract as a  999 value;

ELSE extract average value. Extaction Sample Event

WQPs Sample Event

WQPs Normalization of Disinfectant Additions Conversion of disinfectant addition information into a standardized format. Normalization is performed according to Appendix F for Disinfectant Chemical Name, Dose Rate, and Measurement Formula. Extraction Unit Process Unit Process Liquid Volume Normalize Liquid Volume to from cubic feet to gallons for ozone unit processes. Multiply Liquid Volume ( gal) by 7.48 gal/ cuft. Extraction Unit Process Unit Process T10 ( min) for ozone chambers Estimated effective contact time for disinfection,

in minutes, for ozone chambers. If Ozone Gas Split = 0, then ( T50 * 0.7); Else ( T50 *

0.1). Extraction Unit Process  O3 Chamber Unit Process T50 ( min) for unit processes where missing Theoretical detention time for unit processes in minutes. If T50 = " Missing," then Unit Process Liquid Volume/( Flow, mgd* 694.44, gpm/ mgd); ELSE T50 =

VALUE. Extraction Unit Process Unit Process Normalization of Chemical Feeds Conversion of chemical feed information into a standardized format. Normalization is performed according to Appendix G for Chemical Feed Name, Dose Rate, and Chemical Formula. Extraction Unit Process

Chem Feed Unit Process

Chem Feed Total Applied Ozone Dose Total ozone dose applied within an ozone contactor. Sum all ozone dosages for disinfection addition unit processes with sequence numbers less than the maximum sequence number of the chambers included in the ozone contactor basin but less than than the maximum sequence number for chambers in the prior ozone contactor. Extraction O3 Contactor O3 Contactor Number of Ozone Chambers Total number of ozone contact chambers in a contact basin. Find the maximum and minimum sequence number for the ozone contact basin. Calculate the sum of chambers by [( MAX Seq)  ( Min Seq) + 1]. Extraction Unit Process  O3 Contactor Unit Process  O3 Contactor E 6 SDC 0002 007 HB 2011B April 21, 2000 CHM NAME CHEMICAL FORMULA ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 CACL CACL CACL 0.992 mg/ L CL2 CL2 CL2 # Cl2/ MGDx8.34 CL2 SOY 1 1 mg/ L CL2 mg/ L CL2 CL2 SOY CL2 100% Cl2 CL2 SOY 1 1 mg/ L CL2 mg/ L CL2 CL2 SOY CL2 Chlorine Gas CL2 1 mg/ L CL2 CL2 CL2 Cl CL2 SOY 1 1 mg/ L CL2 mg/ L CL2 CL2 SOY CL2 CL2 CL2 SOY 1 1 mg/ L CL2 mg/ L CL2 CL2 SOY CL2 CL 2 CL2 SOY 1 1 mg/ L CL2 mg/ L CL2 CL2 SOY CL2 Cl2 ( g) CL2 1 mg/ L CL2 CL2 CL2 Cl2 ( gas) CL2 1 mg/ L CL2 CL2 CL2 Cl2( g) CL2 1 mg/ L CL2 CL2 CL2 Free Chlorine CL2 SOY 1 1 mg/ L CL2 mg/ L CL2 CL2 SOY CL2 MGDx8.34xPPM= Lbs of CL2/ Day CL2 SOY 1 1 mg/ L CL2 CL2 SOY CL2 HOCl CL2 SOY 1.35 1.35 mg/ L CL2 mg/ L CL2 CL2 SOY CLO2 Cl02 CLO2 CDA 1 1 mg/ L ClO2 mg/ L ClO2 CLO2 CLO2 CLO2 ClO2 CLO2 CDA 1 1 mg/ L ClO2 mg/ L ClO2 CLO2 CLO2 CLO2 NaClO2 / Cl2 CLO2 1 mg/ L CLO2 CLO2 NH3A MGDx8.34xPPM= Mg/ Lx. 25= PPD/ NH3 NH3 NH3A NH3S 0.834 0.834 0.834 mg/ L N mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3A NH3 NH3 NH3A NH3S 0.834 0.834 0.834 mg/ L N mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3A NH3 ( anhydrous) NH3 NH3A 0.834 0.834 mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3A NH3A NH3 NH3A 0.834 0.834 mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3H 25% NH4OH NH3 NH3A NH3S 0.412 0.412 0.412 mg/ L N mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3H Aqua Ammonia NH3 NH3A NH3S 0.412 0.412 0.412 mg/ L N mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3H NH3( OH) NH3 NH3A 0.412 0.412 mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3H NH30H NH3 NH3A 0.412 0.412 mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3H NH3OH NH3 NH3A 0.412 0.412 mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3H NH4( OH) NH3 NH3A 0.412 0.412 mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3H NH4OH NH3 NH3A 0.412 0.412 mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3H NH3H NH3 NH3A NH3S 0.778 0.778 0.778 mg/ L N mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3H NH4+ NH3 NH3A NH3S 0.778 0.778 0.778 mg/ L N mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3H N NH3 NH3A NH3S 1 1 1 mg/ L N mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3H NH3 N NH3 NH3A NH3S 1 1 1 mg/ L N mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3S ( NH4) 2SO4 NH3 NH3A NH3S 0.212 0.212 0.212 mg/ L N mg/ L N mg/ L N NH3_ N NH3_ N NH3_ N O3 03 O3 1 mg/ L O3 O3 O3 O3 O3 1 mg/ L O3 O3 SOY NA0CL SOY CL2 0.952 0.952 mg/ L CL2 mg/ L CL2 SOY SOY SOY NaClO SOY CL2 0.952 0.952 mg/ L CL2 mg/ L CL2 SOY SOY SOY NaOCl SOY CL2 0.952 0.952 mg/ L CL2 mg/ L CL2 SOY SOY SOY NaOCl @ 13% solution SOY CL2 0.952 0.952 mg/ L CL2 mg/ L CL2 SOY SOY SOY sodium hypoclorite SOY CL2 0.952 0.952 mg/ L CL2 mg/ L CL2 SOY SOY SOY NaOCl as Cl2 SOY CL2 1 1 mg/ L CL2 mg/ L CL2 SOY SOY CL2 Lbs. 1 CL2 MG/ L 1 Where more than one alternative chemical name is shown, the chemical formula could apply to multiple types of chemicals. Therefore, the normalization is performed based on the chemical name identified by the utility as shown in the table below.

Alternative Chemicals Multiplication Factor Normalized Chemical Formula Normalized Chemical Name F 7 SDC 0002 007 HB 2011B April 21, 2000 CHM NAME CHEMICAL FORMULA ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 Where more than one alternative chemical name is shown, the chemical formula could apply to multiple types of chemicals. Therefore, the normalization is performed based on the chemical name identified by the utility as shown in the table below.

Alternative Chemicals Multiplication Factor Normalized Chemical Formula Normalized Chemical Name CLO2 MGDx8.34xppmx. 511x3785/ 1440 1 F 8 SDC 0002 007 HB 2011B April 21, 2000 Number Chem Formula ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT4 ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT4 ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT4 ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT4 1 A12( SO4) 3.49.6H2O ALUM OTH 0.046 0.046 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 2 Al2( SO4) 3: 49.6H2O ALUM OTH 0.046 0.046 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 3 Al2( SO4) 3.18H2O ALUM OTH 0.081 0.081 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 4 Al2( S04) 3 16H20 ALUM OTH 0.086 0.086 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 5 Al2( SO4) 3 . 16 H2O ALUM OTH 0.086 0.086 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 6 Al2( SO4) 3* 16H2O ALUM OTH 0.086 0.086 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 7 Al2( SO4) 3.16H2O ALUM OTH 0.086 0.086 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 8 Al2( SO4) 3 16H2O ALUM OTH 0.086 0.086 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 9 AL2S04: 16H20 ALUM OTH 0.086 0.086 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 10 AL2( SO4) 3* 14 H2O + POLYMER ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 11 ( Al) 2( SO4) 3.14H2O ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 12 ( Al2SO4) 3* 14H2O ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 13 ( Al2SO4) 3.14H2O ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 14 Al2 ( SO4) 3 . 14 H2O ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 15 AL2( S04) 3.14H20 ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 16 Al2( S04) 3.14H2O ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 17 Al2( SO4) 3 14 H2O ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 18 Al2( SO4) 3 * 14 H20 ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 19 AL2( SO4) 3 . 14H20 ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 20 Al2( SO4) 3 . 14H2O ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 21 al2( so4) 3 .14h2o ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 22 AL2( SO4) 3 14H20 ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 23 Al2( SO4) 3 14H2O ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 24 Al2( SO4) 3 14H2O Aqueous ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 25 Al2( so4) 3 x 14 ( H2O) ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 26 AL2( SO4) 3( 14 H2O) ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 27 AL2( SO4) 3* 14 H2O ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 28 Al2( SO4) 3* 14H20 ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 29 Al2( SO4) 3* 14H2O ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 30 Al2( SO4) 3* H2O ( 14 H2O) ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 31 AL2( SO4) 3.14H20 ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 32 Al2( SO4) 3.14H2O ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 33 Al2( SO4) 3.14H2O 48.5% ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 34 Al2( SO4) 3.14H2O 48.5% ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 35 Al2( SO4) 3 14( H2O) ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 36 Al2( SO4) 3 14( H2O) + Floc Agent ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 37 AL2( SO4) 3 14.3H2O ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 38 Al2( SO4) 3 14H2O ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 39 Al2SO4* 14H2O ALUM OTH 0.091 0.091 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 40 Al2( SO4) 3 4H2O ALUM OTH 0.13 0.13 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 41 Al2( SO4) x H2O ALUM OTH 0.15 0.15 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 42 AL2( SO4) 3* H20 + POLYMER ALUM OTH 0.15 0.15 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 43 Al2( SO) 4 ALUM OTH 0.16 0.16 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 44 AL2( SO4) 3 ALUM OTH 0.16 0.16 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 45 Al2( SO4) 3 ( dry wt per gal) ALUM OTH 0.16 0.16 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 46 AL2S04 ALUM OTH 0.16 0.16 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 47 AL2SO4 ALUM OTH 0.16 0.16 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 48 ALSO4 ALUM OTH 0.16 0.16 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 49 ALUM ALUM OTH 0.16 0.16 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 50 8% AL203 ALUM OTH 0.63 0.63 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 51 Al2O3 ALUM OTH 0.63 0.63 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 52 Al ALUM OTH 1 1 mg/ L Al mg/ L Al ALUM ALUM 1 CaCO3 CAOH CAO OTH 0.74 0.74 0.74 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 CAOH CAOH CAOH 2 CaOH2 as mg/ L CaCO3 CAOH CAO OTH 0.74 0.74 0.74 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 CAOH CAOH CAOH 3 Ca OH2 CAOH CAO OTH 1 1 1 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 CAOH CAOH CAOH 4 Ca( OH) 2 CAOH CAO OTH 1 1 1 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 CAOH CAOH CAOH 5 CaOH CAOH CAO OTH 1 1 1 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 CAOH CAOH CAOH 6 CaOH2 CAOH CAO OTH 1 1 1 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 CAOH CAOH CAOH 7 as CaO CAOH CAO OTH 1.32 1.32 1.32 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 CAOH CAOH CAOH 8 CaO CAOH CAO OTH 1.32 1.32 1.32 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 CAOH CAOH CAOH 9 CaO QuickLime CAOH CAO OTH 1.32 1.32 1.32 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 CAOH CAOH CAOH 10 Lime CAOH CAO OTH 1.32 1.32 1.32 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 mg/ L Ca( OH) 2 CAOH CAOH CAOH Where more than one alternative chemical name is shown, the chemical formula could apply to multiple types of chemicals. Therefore, the normalization is performed based on the chemical name identified by the utility as shown in the table below.

Chemical Name Alternatives Multiplication Factors for Normalization Normalized Units Normalized Chemical Names G 9 SDC 0002 007 HB 2011B April 21, 2000 Number Chem Formula ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT4 ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT4 ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT4 ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT4 Where more than one alternative chemical name is shown, the chemical formula could apply to multiple types of chemicals. Therefore, the normalization is performed based on the chemical name identified by the utility as shown in the table below.

Chemical Name Alternatives Multiplication Factors for Normalization Normalized Units Normalized Chemical Names 1 CL2 OTH 1 mg/ L CL2 CL2 1 CO2 CO2 OTH 1 1 mg/ L CO2 mg/ L CO2 CO2 CO2 1 CuSO4* 5H2O OTH 0.64 0.64 mg/ L Cu( SO4) mg/ L Cu( SO4) CUS 2 CuSO OTH 1 1 mg/ L Cu( SO4) mg/ L Cu( SO4) CUS 3 CuSO4 OTH 1 1 mg/ L Cu( SO4) mg/ L Cu( SO4) CUS 1 42% FeCl3.6H2O FEC OTH 0.21 0.21 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 2 FeCl2* 6H2O FEC OTH 0.21 0.21 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 3 FeCl3.6H20 FEC OTH 0.21 0.21 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 4 FeCl3.6H2O FEC OTH 0.21 0.21 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 5 Cl2Fe FEC OTH 0.34 0.34 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 6 Fe Cl3 FEC OTH 0.34 0.34 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 7 FEC FEC OTH 0.34 0.34 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 8 FEC dry wt. FEC OTH 0.34 0.34 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 9 FeCl FEC OTH 0.34 0.34 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 10 FECL2 FEC OTH 0.34 0.34 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 11 FeCl3 FEC OTH 0.34 0.34 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 12 FeCl3 30 % Solu FEC OTH 0.34 0.34 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 13 FeCl3, @ 40% solution FEC OTH 0.34 0.34 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 14 FeCl3, 32 45% FEC OTH 0.34 0.34 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 15 Ferric Chloride FEC OTH 0.34 0.34 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 16 Ferric Chloride  dry wt FEC OTH 0.34 0.34 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 17 Fe FEC FES FOS OTH 1 1 1 1 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON IRON IRON 18 FE3 FEC FES FOS OTH 1 1 1 1 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON IRON IRON 1 Fe5( SO4) 7OH 60% Solution FES OTH 0.29 0.29 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 2 Fe5( SO4) 7OH, 60% Solution FES OTH 0.29 0.29 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 3 Fe2( SO4) 3.9H2O FES OTH 0.20 0.20 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 4 ( FE2SO4) 3 FES OTH 0.28 0.28 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 5 Fe2( SO4) 3 FES OTH 0.28 0.28 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 6 FES FES OTH 0.28 0.28 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON 7 FeSO4.7H2O FES FOS OTH 0.20 0.20 0.20 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON IRON 8 FESO4 FES FOS OTH 0.37 0.37 0.37 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON IRON 9 FOS FES FOS OTH 0.37 0.37 0.37 mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe mg/ L Fe IRON IRON IRON 1 HCl OTH 1 mg/ L HCl HCL 1 23% H2SiF6 HFS OTH 0.79 0.79 mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS HFS 2 23% H2SiF6 HFS OTH 0.79 0.79 mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS HFS 3 F2H2Si HFS OTH 0.79 0.79 mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS HFS 4 H2 Si F6 HFS OTH 0.79 0.79 mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS HFS 5 h2fs6 HFS OTH 0.79 0.79 mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS HFS 6 H2SiF6 HFS OTH 0.79 0.79 mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS HFS 7 H2SiF6 ( 25% solution) HFS OTH 0.79 0.79 mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS HFS 8 H2SiF6 25% HFS OTH 0.79 0.79 mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS HFS 9 H2SiF6, 23% solution HFS OTH 0.79 0.79 mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS HFS 10 H2SiF76 HFS OTH 0.79 0.79 mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS HFS 11 HFS HFS OTH 0.79 0.79 mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS HFS 12 HSF HFS OTH 0.79 0.79 mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS HFS 13 24% as H2SiF6 as F HFS OTH 1 1 mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS HFS 14 as F HFS SOF OTH 1 1 1 mg/ L F mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS SOF HFS 15 F HFS SOF OTH 1 1 1 mg/ L F mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS SOF HFS 16 F HFS SOF OTH 1 1 1 mg/ L F mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS SOF HFS 17 Fl HFS SOF OTH 1 1 1 mg/ L F mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS SOF HFS 18 Fl HFS SOF OTH 1 1 1 mg/ L F mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS SOF HFS 19 Fluoride HFS SOF OTH 1 1 1 mg/ L F mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS SOF HFS 20 H2SiF6 ( 25% soln) ppm as F HFS OTH 1 1 mg/ L F mg/ L F HFS HFS 1 H2O2 OTH 1 mg/ L H2O2 HPX 2 Peroxide OTH 1 mg/ L H2O2 HPX 1 NH3 OTH 0.82 mg/ L N NH3 1 ActiCarb PAC OTH 1 1 mg/ L C mg/ L C PAC PAC 2 C PAC OTH 1 1 mg/ L C mg/ L C PAC PAC 3 Calgon  WPH PAC OTH 1 1 mg/ L C mg/ L C PAC PAC 4 Carbon PAC OTH 1 1 mg/ L C mg/ L C PAC PAC 5 CARBON 93% PAC OTH 1 1 mg/ L C mg/ L C PAC PAC 6 Norit Americas Hydrodarco B PAC OTH 1 1 mg/ L C mg/ L C PAC PAC G 10 SDC 0002 007 HB 2011B April 21, 2000 Number Chem Formula ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT4 ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT4 ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT4 ALT1 ALT2 ALT3 ALT4 Where more than one alternative chemical name is shown, the chemical formula could apply to multiple types of chemicals. Therefore, the normalization is performed based on the chemical name identified by the utility as shown in the table below.

Chemical Name Alternatives Multiplication Factors for Normalization Normalized Units Normalized Chemical Names 7 PAC PAC OTH 1 1 mg/ L C mg/ L C PAC PAC 8 PAC ( Calgon) PAC OTH 1 1 mg/ L C mg/ L C PAC PAC 9 PAC, 3 parts per million PAC OTH 1 1 mg/ L C mg/ L C PAC PAC 10 PAC, 3.5 parts per billion PAC OTH 1 1 mg/ L C mg/ L C PAC PAC 11 pac, 5 parts per Billion PAC OTH 1 1 mg/ L C mg/ L C PAC PAC 12 PAC, 7 parts per billion PAC OTH 1 1 mg/ L C mg/ L C PAC PAC 13 PPC PAC OTH 1 1 mg/ L C mg/ L C PAC PAC 14 TS PAC OTH 1 1 mg/ L C mg/ L C PAC PAC 1 50% KOH PHX OTH 1 1 mg/ L KOH mg/ L KOH KOH KOH 1 KMn04 PPM OTH 1 1 mg/ L KMnO4 mg/ L KMnO4 PPM PPM 2 KMnO4 PPM OTH 1 1 mg/ L KMnO4 mg/ L KMnO4 PPM PPM 3 KMnO4 powder PPM OTH 1 1 mg/ L KMnO4 mg/ L KMnO5 PPM PPM 4 PPM PPM OTH 1 1 mg/ L KMnO4 mg/ L KMnO6 PPM PPM 1 SO2 OTH 1 mg/ L SO2 SO2 1 Na2( CO3) SOC OTH 0.57 0.57 mg/ L CO3 mg/ L CO3 SOC SOC 2 Na2C03 SOC OTH 0.57 0.57 mg/ L CO3 mg/ L CO3 SOC SOC 3 NA2CO3 SOC OTH 0.57 0.57 mg/ L CO3 mg/ L CO3 SOC SOC 4 NaCO3 SOC OTH 0.57 0.57 mg/ L CO3 mg/ L CO3 SOC SOC 5 soc SOC OTH 0.57 0.57 mg/ L CO3 mg/ L CO3 SOC SOC 1 NaF SOF OTH 0.45 0.45 mg/ L F mg/ L F SOF SOF 2 Na2SiF5 SOF OTH 0.61 0.61 mg/ L F mg/ L F SOF SOF 3 Na2SiF6 SOF OTH 0.61 0.61 mg/ L F mg/ L F SOF SOF 4 NaSiF6 SOF OTH 0.61 0.61 mg/ L F mg/ L F SOF SOF 5 SOF SOF OTH 1 1 mg/ L F mg/ L F SOF SOF 1 25% NaOH SOH OTH 1 1 mg/ L NaOH mg/ L NaOH SOH SOH 2 50% NaOH SOH OTH 1 1 mg/ L NaOH mg/ L NaOH SOH SOH 3 NaHO SOH OTH 1 1 mg/ L NaOH mg/ L NaOH SOH SOH 4 NaOH SOH OTH 1 1 mg/ L NaOH mg/ L NaOH SOH SOH 5 NaOH ( 50%) SOH OTH 1 1 mg/ L NaOH mg/ L NaOH SOH SOH 6 NaOH  50% SOH OTH 1 1 mg/ L NaOH mg/ L NaOH SOH SOH 7 NAOH ( 50%) SOH OTH 1 1 mg/ L NaOH mg/ L NaOH SOH SOH 8 NaOH( 20%) SOH OTH 1 1 mg/ L NaOH mg/ L NaOH SOH SOH 9 NAOH, 50% SOH OTH 1 1 mg/ L NaOH mg/ L NaOH SOH SOH 10 SOH SOH OTH 1 1 mg/ L NaOH mg/ L NaOH SOH SOH 1 NaOCl OTH 0.95 mg/ L CL2 SOY 1 H2S04 SUA OTH 1 1 mg/ L H2( SO4) mg/ L H2( SO4) SUA SUA 2 H2SO4 SUA OTH 1 1 mg/ L H2( SO4) mg/ L H2( SO4) SUA SUA 3 SUA SUA OTH 1 1 mg/ L H2( SO4) mg/ L H2( SO4) SUA SUA 1 This table converts all metal coagulants into the mg/ L of metal ( Aluminum or Iron) added regardless of coagulant type. This is done to minimize the number of normalization calculations required.

NOTE: For the following units, assume the proper units are provided in the normalized units appropriate to the chemical name indicated.

Lbs.

mg/ l MGD x PPM x 8.34 = Lbs/ Day Mgdx8.34xppm/ wtx3785/ 1440 none NONE GIVEN not known ppm on dry wt basis ( 33%)

PPM, 1 part per million product proprietary Stuff visual as Product PPM ( WT/ WT) G 11


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 146 (Wednesday, July 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45731-45732]
[FR Doc No: 2020-16377]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. 2020-0387]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of a Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Domestic and
International Flight Plans

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The collection involves extracting flight data such as
aircraft, routing speed, etc. from domestic and international flights.
FAA Form 7233-1, Flight Plan: Domestic flight plan information is used
to govern the flight of aircraft for the protection and identification
of aircraft and property and persons on the ground. The information is
used by air traffic controllers, search and rescue (SAR) personnel,
flight standards inspectors, accident investigators, military, law
enforcement, and the Department of Homeland Security. FAA Form 7233-4,
International Flight Plan: International flight plan information is
used for the same purposes as domestic flight plans; in addition, it is
used by Customs and international controllers.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by August 28, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aldwin Humphrey by email at:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0026.
    Title: Domestic and International Flight plans.
    Form Numbers: FAA form7233-1 Domestic Flight Plan, FAA form 7233-4
International Flight Plan.
    Type of Review: Renewal of information collection.
    Background: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is authorized
and directed by Title 49, United States Code, paragraph 40103(b), to
prescribe air traffic rules and regulations governing the flight of
aircraft for the protection and identification of aircraft and property
and persons on the ground. Title 14, CFR, Part 91, Subchapter F,
prescribes flight rules governing the operation of aircraft within the
United States. These rules govern the operation of aircraft (other than
moored balloons, kites, unmanned rockets and unmanned free balloons)
within the United States and for flights across international

borders. Paragraphs 91.153 and 91.169, address flight plan information
requirements. Paragraph 91.173 states requirements for when an
instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan must be filed. International
Standards Rules of the Air, Annex 2 to the Convention on International
Civil Aviation paragraph 3.3 states requirements for filing
international flight plans. In addition, a Washington, District of
Columbia (DC) Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA) was implemented
requiring pilots operating within a certain radius of Washington, DC to
follow special security flight rules. The SFRA also includes three (3)
general aviation airports in Maryland (College Park, Clinton/Washington
Executive/Hyde Field, and Friendly/Potomac Airfield) where pilots are
required to file a flight plan regardless of whether they are flying
under visual flight rules (VFR) or IFR. This collection of information
supports the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of
Defense in addition to the normal flight plan purposes.
    Almost 100 percent of flight plans are filed electronically.
However, as a courtesy to the aviation public, flight plans may be
submitted in paper form. Flight plans may be filed in the following
ways:
     Air carrier and air taxi operations, and certain corporate
aviation departments, have been granted authority to electronically
file flight plans directly with the FAA. The majority of air carrier
and air taxi flights are processed in this manner.
     Air carrier and air taxi operators may submit pre-stored
flight plan information on scheduled flights to Air Route Traffic
Control Centers (ARTCC) to be entered electronically at the appropriate
times.
     Pilots may call 1-800-WX-BRIEF (992-7433) and file flight
plans with a flight service station specialist who enters the
information directly into a computer system that automatically
transmits the information to the appropriate air traffic facility.
Pilots calling certain flight service stations have the option of using
a voice recorder to store the information that will later be entered by
a specialist.
     Private and corporate pilots who fly the same aircraft and
routes at regular times may prestore flight plans with flight service
stations. The flight plans will then be entered automatically into the
air traffic system at the appropriate time.
     Pilots who visit a flight service station in person may
choose to a file flight plan by using a paper form. The data will then
be entered into a computer and filed electronically. The pilot will
often keep the paper copy for his/her record.
    Respondents: Air carrier and air taxi operations, and certain
corporate aviation departments, General Aviation Pilots.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 2.5 minutes per flight plan.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 718,618 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 23, 2020.
Aldwin E. Humphrey,
Air Traffic Control Specialist, Office of Flight Service Safety and
Operations, AJR-B.
[FR Doc. 2020-16377 Filed 7-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58645-58646]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25218]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736.
Extension:
    Rules 15Fb1-1 through 15Fb6-2 and Forms SBSE, SBSE-A, SBSE-BD,
SBSE-C and SBSE-W, SEC File No. 270-642, OMB Control No. 3235-0696.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in Rules 15Fb1-1 through 15Fb6-2
and Forms SBSE, SBSE-A, SBSE-BD, SBSE-C and SBSE-W (17 CFR 240.15Fb1-1
through 240.15Fb6-2, and 17 CFR 249.1600, 249.1600a, 249.1600b,
249.1600c and 249.1601), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78a et seq.). The Commission plans to submit this existing
collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget
(``OMB'') for extension and approval.
    The Commission adopted Rules 15Fb1-1 through 15Fb6-2 and Forms
SBSE, SBSE-A, SBSE-BD, SBSE-C and SBSE-W on August 5, 2015 to create a
process to register SBS Entities. Forms SBSE, SBSE-A, and SBSE-BD and
SBSE-C were designed to elicit certain information from applicants. The
Commission uses the information disclosed by applicants through the SBS
Entity registration rules and forms to: (1) Determine whether an
applicant meets the standards for registration set forth in the
provisions of the Exchange Act; and (2) develop an information resource
regarding SBS Entities where members of the public may obtain relevant,
up-to-date information about SBS Entities, and where the Commission may
obtain information for examination and enforcement purposes. Without
the information provided through these SBS Entity registration rules
and forms, the Commission could not effectively determine whether the
applicant meets the standards for registration or implement policy
objectives of the Exchange Act.
    The information collected pursuant to Rule 15Fb3-2 and Form SBSE-W
allows the Commission to determine whether it is appropriate to allow
an SBS Entity to withdraw from registration and to facilitate that
withdrawal. Without this information, the Commission would be unable to
effectively determine whether it was appropriate to allow an SBS Entity
to withdraw. In addition, it would be more difficult for the Commission
to properly regulate SBS Entities if it were unable to quickly identify
those that have withdrawn from the security-based swap business.
    In 2017 there were approximately 55 entities that may need to
register as SBS Entities. The Commission estimates that these Entities
likely would incur a total burden of 9,825 hours per year to comply
with Rules 15Fb1-1 through 15Fb6-2 and Forms SBSE, SBSE-A, SBSE-BD,
SBSE-C and SBSE-W.
    In addition, Rules 15Fb1-1 through 15Fb6-2 and Forms SBSE, SBSE-A,
SBSE-BD, SBSE-C and SBSE-W may impose certain costs on non-resident
persons that apply to be registered with the Commission as SBS
Entities, including an initial and ongoing costs associated with
obtaining an opinion of counsel indicating that it can, as a matter of
law, provide the Commission with access to its books and records and
submit to Commission examinations, and an ongoing cost associated with
establishing and maintaining a relationship with a U.S. agent for
service of process.
    The staff estimates, based on internet research,\1\ that it would
cost each nonresident SBS Entity approximately $176 annually to appoint
and maintain a relationship with a U.S. agent for service of process.
Consequently, the total cost for all nonresident SBS Entities to
appoint and maintain relationships with U.S. agents for service of
process is approximately $3,872 per year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See, e.g., http://www.incorp.com/registered-agent-resident-agent-services.aspx (as of September 21, 2018, $99 per state per
year), https://ct.wolterskluwer.com/registered-agent-services?mm_campaign=Enter_Campaign_Code_Here&keyword=registered%20agent&utm_source=Google&utm_medium=CPC&utm_campaign=RegisteredAgent&jadid=69563123457&jap=1t3&jk=registered%20agent&jkId=gc:a8a8ae4cd4a6542cf014a97541e8d183e:t1_p:k_registered%20agent:pl_&jp=&js=1&jsid=35672&jt=1 (as of September 21, 2018, $279 per year), and https://www.ailcorp.com/services/registered-agent (as of September 21, 2018,
$149 per year). The staff sought websites that provided pricing
information and a comprehensive description of their registered
agent services. We calculated our estimate by averaging the costs
provided on these three websites--($99 + $279 + $149) / 3 = $176.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Non-resident SBS Entities also would incur outside legal costs
associated with obtaining an opinion of counsel. The staff estimates
that each of the estimated 22 non-resident persons that likely will
apply to register as SBS Entities with the Commission would incur, on
average, approximately $25,000 in outside legal costs to obtain the
opinion of counsel necessary to register, and that the total annualized
cost for all nonresident SBS Entities to obtain this opinion of counsel
would be approximately $183,333. Nonresident SBS Entities would also
need to obtain a revised opinion of counsel after any changes in the
legal or regulatory framework that would impact the SBS Entity's
ability to provide, or manner in which it provides, the Commission with
prompt access to its books and records or that impacts the Commission's
ability to inspect and examine the SBS Entity. We do not believe this
would occur frequently, and therefore estimate that one non-resident
entity may need to recertify annually. Thus, the total ongoing cost
associated with obtaining a revised opinion of counsel regarding the
new regulatory regime would be approximately $25,000 annually.
Consequently, the total annualized cost burden associated with Rules
15Fb1-1 through 15Fb6-2 and Forms SBSE, SBSE-A, SBSE-BD, SBSE-C and
SBSE-W would be approximately $212,205 per year.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.

    Please direct your written comments to: Charles Riddle, Acting
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o Candace Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or send an
email to: [email protected].

     Dated: November 14, 2018.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-25218 Filed 11-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: May 19, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 96)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 27973-27975]
[DOCID:fr19my10-19]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0521; Directorate Identifier 2009-NE-21-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce plc RB211-524C2 Series
Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as: A number of LPT casings have been found cracked during
engine shop visit. Cracking of the LPT casing reduces the capability of
the casing to contain debris in the event of an LPT stage 1 blade
failure. Therefore, blade failure in an engine featuring a cracked LPT
casing may result in release of uncontained high energy debris. For the
reason described above, this AD requires repetitive inspections and
corrective actions, depending on

findings. We are proposing this AD to detect cracks in the LPT casings,
which could result in the release of uncontained high-energy debris in
the event of a stage 1 blade failure. Uncontained high-energy debris
could result in damage to the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 6, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Contact Rolls-Royce plc, P.O. Box 31, Derby, DE24 8BJ, United
Kingdom; telephone 011 44 1332 242424; fax 011 44 1332 249936 for the
service information identified in this proposed AD.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
the same as the Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara Chaidez, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0521;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NE-21-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including, if provided, the name of the individual who
sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477-78).

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2009-0083, dated April 16, 2009 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    A number of LPT casings have been found cracked during engine
shop visit. Cracking of the LPT casing reduces the capability of the
casing to contain debris in the event of an LPT stage 1 blade
failure. Therefore, blade failure in an engine featuring a cracked
LPT casing may result in release of uncontained high energy debris.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Rolls-Royce plc has issued Alert Service Bulletin RB.211-72-AG076,
dated November 13, 2008. The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of the
United Kingdom, and is approved for operation in the United States.
Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the United Kingdom, they have
notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of
the same type design.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 10 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 10 work-hours per product to comply with this
proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $25,000 per product. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $258,500.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Rolls-Royce plc (Formerly Rolls-Royce Limited): Docket No. FAA-2010-
0521; Directorate Identifier 2009-NE-21-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by July 6, 2010.

Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Rolls-Royce plc (RR) model RB211-524C2-19
and RB211-524C2-B-19 turbofan engines. These engines are installed
on, but not limited to, Boeing 747 series airplanes.

Reason

    (d) A number of low-pressure turbine (LPT) casings have been
found cracked during engine shop visit. Cracking of the LPT casing
reduces the capability of the casing to contain debris in the event
of an LPT stage 1 blade failure. Blade failure in an engine with a
cracked LPT casing may result in release of uncontained high-energy
debris.
    We are issuing this AD to detect cracks in the LPT casings,
which could result in the release of uncontained high-energy debris
in the event of a stage 1 blade failure. Uncontained high energy
debris could result in damage to the airplane.

Actions and Compliance

    (e) Unless already done, do the following actions:

Initial Inspection Requirements

    (1) Perform a fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI) before the
life of the LPT casing has reached 4,500 cycles-since-new (CSN) or
within 4,500 cycles-since-last inspection (CSLI) or within 500
cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
You can find guidance on performing the FPI in RR Alert Service
Bulletin (ASB) RB.211-72-AG076, dated November 13, 2008.

Repetitive Inspection Requirements

    (2) Thereafter, perform an FPI at intervals not exceeding 4,500
CSLI. You can find guidance on performing the FPI in Rolls-Royce plc
ASB RB.211-72-AG076, dated November 13, 2008.

Remove Parts With Cracks

    (3) Remove cracked LPT casings, found using paragraphs (e)(1) or
(e)(2) of this AD, from service before further flight.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19.

Related Information

    (g) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2009-0083, dated
April 16, 2009, and Rolls-Royce plc Alert Service Bulletin No.
RB.211-72-AG076, dated November 13, 2008, for related information.
Contact Rolls-Royce plc, P.O. Box 31, Derby, DE24 8BJ, United
Kingdom; telephone 011 44 1332 242424; fax 011 44 1332 249936, for a
copy of this service information.
    (h) Contact Tara Chaidez, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for more information about this AD.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on May 12, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-11997 Filed 5-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7448-7449]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02658]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0112; FRL-9557-01-OMS]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of
Fabrics and Other Textiles (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), NESHAP for Printing, Coating and
Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles (EPA ICR Number 2071.10, OMB
Control Number 2060-0522), to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act.
This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved
through March 31, 2022. Public comments were previously requested, via
the Federal Register, on April 13, 2021 during a 60-day comment period.
This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A
fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated
burden and cost to the public. An agency may neither conduct nor
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before March 11,
2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OAR-2021-0112, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method)
or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
    Submit written comments and recommendations to OMB for the proposed
information collection within 30 days of publication of this notice to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information
collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for
Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Muntasir Ali, Sector Policies and
Program Division (D243-05), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain

in detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are
available in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed
online at https://www.regulations.gov, or in person, at the EPA Docket
Center, WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW,
Washington, DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is 202-566-
1744. For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit:
http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and
Other Textiles apply to each existing, new, or reconstructed source
involved in printing, coating, slashing, dyeing or finishing of fabric
and other textiles. In general, all NESHAP standards require initial
notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/
operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to
maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup,
shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or
any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These
notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining
compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart OOOO.
    Form Numbers: 5900-530.
    Respondents/affected entities: Printing, coating, slashing, dyeing,
or finishing of fabric and other textiles facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart OOOO).
    Estimated number of respondents: 44 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially and semiannually.
    Total estimated burden: 7,080 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $960,000 (per year), which includes $123,000
in annualized capital/startup and/or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the estimates: There is an increase in burden from the
most-recently approved ICR as currently identified in the OMB Inventory
of Approved Burdens. This is due to three considerations. This ICR
incorporates the incremental burden from the 2019 RTR amendment (ICR
No. 2071.09) into the total cost of the rule. The regulations were
revised in the 2019 RTR amendment adding a requirement to periodically
test add-on control devices, resulting in an increase in capital/
startup costs for this testing, as well as for increased labor burden
for conducting the tests, submitting reports, and keeping records. An
additional facility that is subject to this subpart was identified in a
search of EPA's ECHO database. This facility became subject to this
subpart after the 2019 RTR; therefore, the respondent counts in this
ICR renewal are updated to include this facility.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-02658 Filed 2-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 12640]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05808]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

One Hundred and First RTCA 159 Plenary

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: One Hundred and First RTCA 159 Plenary.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of One Hundred and First RTCA 159 Plenary.

DATES: The meeting will be held May 03, 2018 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. EDT.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: Virtual: https://rtca.webex.com/rtca/j.php?MTID=m898a2c3d9227c3b790bf19f89196dd35,
Meeting number (access code): 639 753 422, Meeting password: Sc-
159_101!.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karan Hofmann at [email protected] or
202-330-0680, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW, Suite 910,
Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax at (202)
833-9434, or website at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a meeting of the One Hundred and First RTCA 159
Plenary. The agenda will include the following:

1. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS: DFO, RTCA AND CO-CHAIRS
2. APPROVAL OF SUMMARIES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: ONE HUNDREDTH MEETING
HELD MARCH 16, 2018 (RTCA PAPER NO. 075-18/SC159-1071)
3. REVIEW OF GNSS L1/L5 ANTENNA MOPS FINAL REVIEW AND COMMENT (FRAC)
ACTIVITIES
4. DECISION TO APPROVE RELEASE OF GNSS L1/L5 ANTENNA MOPS FOR
PRESENTATION TO PROGRAM MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE FOR PUBLICATION
5. GPS/INTERFERENCE (WG-6): UPDATE REGARDING TAKING DRAFT DO-292
REVISION INTO FINAL REVIEW AND COMMENT (FRAC)
6. DISCUSSION OF TERMS OF REFERENCE UPDATES
7. ACTION ITEM REVIEW
8. ASSIGNMENT/REVIEW OF FUTURE WORK
9. OTHER BUSINESS
10. DATE AND PLACE OF NEXT MEETING
11. ADJOURN

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 19, 2018.
Michelle Swearingen,
Systems and Equipment Standards Branch, AIR-6B0, Policy and Innovation
Division, AIR-600, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2018-05808 Filed 3-21-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7830-7832]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02837]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP22-42-000]

Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Application and
Establishing Intervention Deadline

    Take notice that on January 21, 2022, Northern Natural Gas Company
(Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, NE 68124, filed an
application under sections 7(c) and 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA),
and Part 157 of the Commission's regulations requesting authorization
to: (1) Abandon in-place the A-line and appurtenances in Boone,
Webster, Wright, and Hancock counties, Iowa; and (2) install the D-line
extension and above-ground facilities, all with appurtenances, in
Wright County, Iowa. Northern estimates the cost for the project to be
$31,245,046.
    Specifically, Northern proposes to abandon approximately 82.70
miles of 20-inch-diameter pipeline on Northern's IAM60601 A-line system
and appurtenances. Northern also requests authorization to construct
and operate an approximately 6.04-mile extension of its 30-inch-
diameter Ogden to Ventura IAM60604 D-line and appurtenances to replace
the capacity associated with the abandoned A-line, all as more fully
set forth in the application which is on file with the Commission and
open to public inspection.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this application should be directed to
Michael T. Loeffler, Senior Director of Certificates and External
Affairs for Northern, 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, NE 68124, by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email at [email protected].
    Pursuant to Section 157.9 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure,\1\ within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will
either: Complete its environmental review and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or environmental
assessment (EA) for this proposal. The filing of an EA in the
Commission's public record for this proceeding or the issuance of a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to notify
federal and state agencies of the timing for the completion of all
necessary reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal
authorizations within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission
staff's FEIS or EA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Sec.  157.9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Participation

    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project: You can file comments on the project, and you can file a
motion to intervene in the proceeding. There is no fee or cost for
filing comments or intervening. The deadline for filing a motion to
intervene is 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2022.

Comments

    Any person wishing to comment on the project may do so. Comments
may include statements of support or objections to the project as a
whole or specific aspects of the project. The more specific your
comments, the more useful they will be. To ensure that your comments
are timely and properly recorded, please submit your comments on or
before February 25, 2022.
    There are three methods you can use to submit your comments to the
Commission. In all instances, please reference the Project docket
number CP22-42-000 in your submission.
    (1) You may file your comments electronically by using the eComment
feature, which is located on the Commission's website at www.ferc.gov
under the link to Documents and Filings. Using eComment is an easy
method for interested persons to submit brief, text-only comments on a
project;
    (2) You may file your comments electronically by using the eFiling
feature, which is located on the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov)
under the link to Documents and Filings. With eFiling, you can provide
comments in a variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your
submission. New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking
on ``eRegister.'' You will be asked to select the type of filing you
are making; first select ``General'' and then select ``Comment on a
Filing''; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the following address below.\2\ Your written comments must reference
the Project docket number (CP22-42-000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Hand delivered submissions in docketed proceedings should be
delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225 Wilkins Avenue,
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission encourages electronic filing of comments (options 1
and 2 above) and has eFiling staff available to assist you at (202)
502-8258 or [email protected]
    Persons who comment on the environmental review of this project
will be placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, and will
receive notification when the environmental documents (EA or EIS) are
issued for this project and will be notified of meetings associated
with the Commission's environmental review process.
    The Commission considers all comments received about the project in
determining the appropriate action to be taken. However, the filing of
a comment alone will not serve to make the filer a party to the
proceeding. To become a party, you must intervene in the proceeding.
For instructions on how to intervene, see below.

Interventions

    Any person, which includes individuals, organizations, businesses,
municipalities, and other entities,\3\ has the option to file a motion
to intervene in this proceeding. Only intervenors have the right to
request rehearing of Commission orders issued in this proceeding and to
subsequently challenge the Commission's orders in the U.S. Circuit
Courts of Appeal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 18 CFR 385.102(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To intervene, you must submit a motion to intervene to the
Commission in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure \4\ and the regulations under the NGA \5\ by the
intervention deadline for the project, which is February 25, 2022. As
described further in Rule 214, your motion to intervene must state, to
the extent known, your position regarding the proceeding, as well as
your interest in the proceeding. [For an individual, this could include
your status as a landowner, ratepayer, resident of an impacted
community, or recreationist. You do not need to have property directly
impacted by the project in order to intervene.] For more information
about motions to intervene, refer to the FERC website at https://www.ferc.gov/resources/guides/how-to/intervene.asp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 18 CFR 385.214.
    \5\ 18 CFR 157.10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There are two ways to submit your motion to intervene. In both
instances, please reference the Project docket number CP22-42-000 in
your submission.
    (1) You may file your motion to intervene by using the Commission's
eFiling feature, which is located on the Commission's website
(www.ferc.gov) under the link to Documents and Filings. New eFiling
users must first create an account by clicking on ``eRegister.'' You
will be asked to select the type of filing you are making; first select
``General'' and then select ``Intervention.'' The eFiling feature
includes a document-less intervention option; for more information,
visit https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/document-less-intervention.pdf; or
    (2) You can file a paper copy of your motion to intervene, along
with three copies, by mailing the documents to the address below.\6\
Your motion to intervene must reference the Project docket number CP22-
42-000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Hand delivered submissions in docketed proceedings should be
delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225 Wilkins Avenue,
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Kimberly D. Bose Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission encourages electronic filing of motions to intervene
(option 1 above) and has eFiling staff available to assist you at (202)
502-8258 or [email protected]

    Protests and motions to intervene must be served on the applicant
either by mail or email (with a link to the document) at: 1111 South
103rd Street, Omaha, NE 68124 or at [email protected]. Any
subsequent submissions by an intervenor must be served on the applicant
and all other parties to the proceeding. Contact information for
parties can be downloaded from the service list at the eService link on
FERC Online.
    All timely, unopposed \7\ motions to intervene are automatically
granted by operation of Rule 214(c)(1).\8\ Motions to intervene that
are filed after the intervention deadline are untimely and may be
denied. Any late-filed motion to intervene must show good cause for
being late and must explain why the time limitation should be waived
and provide justification by reference to factors set forth in Rule
214(d) of the Commission's Rules and Regulations.\9\ A person obtaining
party status will be placed on the service list maintained by the
Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies (paper or
electronic) of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other
parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The applicant has 15 days from the submittal of a motion to
intervene to file a written objection to the intervention.
    \8\ 18 CFR 385.214(c)(1).
    \9\ 18 CFR 385.214(b)(3) and (d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tracking the Proceeding

    Throughout the proceeding, additional information about the project
will be available from the Commission's Office of External Affairs, at
(866) 208-FERC, or on the FERC website at www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link as described above. The eLibrary link also provides
access to the texts of all formal documents issued by the Commission,
such as orders, notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. For more information and to register, go to
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.
    Intervention Deadline: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2022.

    Dated: February 4, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-02837 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81316-81317]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32729]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OCEA-2011-0274; FRL--9940-69-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for the Wood Building Products
Surface Coating Industry (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for the Wood Building
Products Surface Coating Industry (40 CFR part 63, subpart QQQQ)
(Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No. 2034.06, OMB Control No. 2060-0510) to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved
through December 31, 2015. Public comments were previously requested
via the Federal Register (80 FR 32116) on June 5, 2015 during a 60-day
comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public
comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its
estimated burden and cost to the public. An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before January 28,
2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OCEA-2011-0274, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our

preferred method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for
EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: Owners and operators of wood building products surface
coating facilities are required to comply with reporting and record
keeping requirements for the general provisions of 40 CFR part 63,
subpart A, as well as the specific requirements at 40 CFR part 63,
subpart QQQQ. This includes submitting initial notifications,
performance tests and periodic reports and results, and maintaining
records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or
malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period
during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These reports are
used by EPA to determine compliance with the standards.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Wood building products surface
coating facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart QQQQ).
    Estimated number of respondents: 232 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and semiannually.
    Total estimated burden: 75,800 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $7,880,000 (per year), includes $278,000
annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a small adjustment increase in
the respondent and Agency labor hours in this ICR compared to the
previous ICR. There is also a decrease in the total O&M costs. This is
not due to program changes; rather, the changes occurred because we are
rounding total values in this ICR to three significant figures.

Courtney Kerwin,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-32729 Filed 12-28-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 41 (Friday, March 3, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 12451]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04157]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9031-9]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General
Information<PHONE_NUMBER> or http://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 02/20/2017 Through 02/24/2017
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's
comment letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20170028, Draft, BLM, NV, Gold Bar Mine Project, Comment Period
Ends: 04/17/2017, Contact: Christine Gabriel<PHONE_NUMBER>

    Dated: February 28, 2017.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2017-04157 Filed 3-2-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P