MEMORANDUM

From:	Rebecca von dem Hagen, EPA/Stratospheric Protection Division

To:	EPA Air Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0198

Subject:	Items incorporated by reference into EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0198
	from Docket A-91-42

The following items are currently listed in the SNAP program's general docket, A-91-42. They are documents supporting the original March 18, 1994 SNAP rule and they are relevant to EPA's review of substitutes. Therefore, I am incorporating these items into docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0198 by reference.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY I

Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

I.	1.	57 FR 1984.  January 16, 1992.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.A

Items Considered in Developing Proposal:  EPA Studies or Contractor Reports

II.A. 	1. 	U.S. EPA.  Carbon Tetrachloride, Working Paper.  Office of Atmospheric and Indoor Air Programs.

      	2.	U.S. EPA.  Costs and Benefits of Phasing Out Production of CFCs and Halons in the United States, Review Draft.  Office of Air and Radiation, November 3, 1989.

      	3.	U.S. EPA.  Hydrofluorocarbons and Hydrochlorofluorocarbons: Interim Report, External Review Draft.  Office of Toxic Substances, November 15, 1990.

      	4. 	U.S. EPA.  Aqueous and Terpene Cleaning: Interim Report, External Review Draft.  Office of Toxic Substances, November 15, 1990.

      	5. 	U.S. EPA.  Analysis of the Environmental Implications of the Future Growth in Demand for Partially Halogenated Chlorinated Compounds.  Office of Air and Radiation, EPA 400/1-90-001, January, 1990.

      6.	U.S. EPA.  Aqueous and Terpene Cleaning: Interim Report, External Review Draft.  Office of Toxic Substances, September 16, 1992.

      7.	United Nations Environment Programme, World Meteorological Organization, et al.  Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 1991.  December 17, 1991.

      8.	Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, World Meteorological Organization, United Nations Environment Programme.  Climate Change:  The IPCC Scientific Assessment.  1990.

      9.	Halogenated Solvents Industry Alliance (HSIA).  1,1,1-Trichloroethane (Methyl Chloroform) White Paper.  May, 1991.

      10.	U.S. EPA.  Alternatives for CFC-113 and Methyl Chloroform in Metal Cleaning.  Office of Air and Radiation.  June, 1991.

	DOCKET A-91-42

	CATEGORY II.A

      11.	U.S. EPA.  Aqueous and Semi-Aqueous Alternatives for CFC-113 and Methyl Chloroform Cleaning of Printed Circuit Board Assemblies.  Office of Air and Radiation.  June, 1991.

      12.	U.S. EPA.  Eliminating CFC-113 and Methyl Chloroform In Precision Cleaning Operations.  Office of Air and Radiation.  June, 1991.

      13.	U.S. EPA.  Conservation and Recycling Practices for CFC-113 and Methyl Chloroform.  Office of Air and Radiation.  June, 1991.

      14.	United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).  Solvents, Coatings, and Adhesives Technical Options Report.  Montreal Protocol 1991 Assessment.  December, 1991.

      15.	UNEP.  Report of the Halons Technical Options Committee.  Montreal Protocol 1991 Assessment.  December, 1991.

      16.	UNEP.  Report of the Refrigeration, Air Conditioning and Heat Pumps Technical Options Committee.  Montreal Protocol 1991 Assessment.  December, 1991.

      17.	UNEP.  Report of the Flexible and Rigid Foams Technical Options Committee.  Montreal Protocol 1991 Assessment.  December, 1991.

      18.	UNEP.  Report of the Aerosol Products, Sterilants Miscellaneous Uses and Carbon Tetrachloride Technical Options Committee.  Montreal Protocol 1991 Assessment.  December, 1991.

      19.	ICF Incorporated.  1992.  "No Clean Soldering Processes."  Memo from Mike Zatz and Farzan Riza, ICF to Nina Bonnelycke and Elaine Haemisseger (EPA).  March 16, 1992.

      20.	U.S. EPA.  Evaluation of R-176 as a Potential Alternative Refrigerant.  Global Change Division.  December, 1992.

      21.	U.S. EPA.  Risk Assessment of Flammable Refrigerants for Use in Home Appliances.  Global Change Division.  September 10, 1991.

      22.	ICF Incorporated.  "Risk Characterization for Manufacturing Substitutes."  Memo from Joanne Colt, Randy Freed, Farzan Riza, and Jim Laurenson of ICF to Nina Bonnelycke, EPA.  May 14, 1992.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.A

      23.	U.S. EPA.  Compliance Costs of Proposed SNAP Rule.  Stratospheric Protection Division.  March, 1993.

      24.	U.S. EPA.  Assessment of CFC Substitutes in Refrigeration and Air Conditioning for SNAP Program.  Prepared by ZBA, Inc.  June 1992.

  	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.B

II.B.	1.	Meeting Summary: The Safe Alternatives Subcommittee of the Stratospheric Ozone Protection Advisory Committee.  Washington, DC,  May 3, 1991.

      2.	Meeting Summary: Development and Implementation of EPA's Safe Alternatives Program: Second Meeting of the Safe Alternatives Subcommittee of the Stratospheric Ozone Protection Advisory Committee.  Washington, DC,  July 16, 1991.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.C

II.C.	1.	Letter to Mike Moore, OSHA from Drusilla Hufford, EPA.  March 26, 1993.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.D

Items Considered in Developing Proposal:	Submissions and Comments from Outside the Agency

(NOTE:  Submissions listed as CBI have been submitted as Confidential Business Information.  They reside in the Office of Air and are not available to the public.)

II.D. 	1.	Dow 							refrigeration
            October 2, 1991

      	2.	Atochem     						refrigeration
            October 30, 1991

      	3.	Loctite 	    					aerosols
            October 26, 1991

      	4.  	3M  							solvents
            November 22, 1991

      	5.  	Manville    						CBI
            December 2, 1991

      	6.	Exxon 						solvents
            December 9, 1991

      	7.	3M	 				 		halons
            December 16, 1991

      	8.	Atochem 		 				CBI
            December 19, 1991

      	9.	QO Chem						solvents,pesticides,
            January 17, 1992					adhesives, coatings and 									inks

     	10.	North American Fire Guardian Tech.   		CBI
            September 27, 1991

     	11.	Dept.Interior  					(comments will be late)
            January 27, 1992

     	12.	NFI Guardian 					CBI
            February 3, 1992

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.D
      13.	Envirosolv 						CBI
            November 19,1991

     	14.	Branson Ultrasonics Corp. 				solvents
            February 13, 1992

     	15.	Evaporative Cooling Institute			air conditioning
            February 20, 1992.

     	16.	Durr Industries 					solvents
            February 26, 1992.

     	17.	Climatran Corp					air conditioning
            (undated)

     	18.	Reznor						refrigerants
         	February 18, 1992

     	19.  	Eagle Tech						refrigerants
            February 14, 1992

     	20.	Ansul 						halons
            February 19, 1992

     	21.	Southern Equipment Co.				air conditioning
            February 20, 1992

     	22.	SW Tech Development Instit. 			air conditioning
            February 21, 1992.

     	23.	Boeing comments 					solvents, foam, coatings,
            February 24, 1992.					aerosols, coolants

     	24.	ANA & Associates					refrigeration
            February 20, 1992.

     	25.	National Fire Protection Assoc.			fire extinguishing (halon)
            February 24, 1992.

     	26.	Scott Aviation					solvents
            February 24, 1992.

     	27.	Allied Signal 					solvents
            February 27,28 1992.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.D

     	28.	Center for Emissions Control 			policy comments

     	29.	China Sun Energy Engineering  			CBI
            February 28, 1992.

     	30.	Department of Energy	 			policy comments
            March 2, 1992.

     	31.	Admiral Co						CBI
            February 28, 1992.

     	32.	BASF letter 						foam
            March 2, 1992.

     	33.	Whirlpool 						CBI
            March 2, 1992.

     	34.	Litton Corporate					solvents
            February 25, 1992.

     	35.	Miles, Inc. 						foams
            February 28, 1992.

     	36.	Asahi Glass America Inc. 				CBI
            February 28, 1992.

     	37.	FilmTec Corp. 					solvents
            February 27, 1992.

     	38.	Fireboy-Xintex 					fire extinguishing (halon)
            February 28, 1992.

     	39.	Grace Metalworking Fluids 			solvents
            February 28, 1992

     	40.	IBM 							solvents
            February 28, 1992.

     	41.	Dow 							solvents
            February 28, 1992.

     	42.	Tecogen, Inc. 					refrigeration
            February 28, 1992.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.D

     	43.	RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co. 				tobacco expansion
            February 26, 1992.

     	44.	Munters 						refrigeration
            February 28, 1992.

     	45.	Air Conditioning & Refrig. Inst.  	 		refrigeration
            March 2, 1992.

     	46.	Society of the Plastics Industry			foams
            March 2,3  1992.(+ addendum 4/7/92)

     	47.	Micro Care Corporation 				solvents
            January 2, 1992

     	48.	Tech Spray 						solvents
            March 2, 1992.

     	49.	Micro Care Corporation 				aerosols
            February 21, 1992.

     	50.	Preservation Technologies, Inc			book preservation
            February 25, 1992.

     	51.	Price-Driscoll Corporation 				aerosols
            March 2, 1992.

     	52.	China Sun Energy Engineering Corp  	 	refrigeration
            February 28, 1992.

     	53.	Eveready Products Corp. 				CBI
            March 1, 1992.

     	54.	Falcon Safety Products 				CBI
            February 26, 1992.

     	55.	Whirlpool Corp 					CBI
            March 2, 1992.

     	56.	OxyChem 						solvents
            February 28, 1992.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.D

  	57.	Air Conditioning and Refrig. Institute	  	refrigerants
            March 2, 1992.

     	58.	Sprits Mold Releases				foams
            March 2, 1992

     	59.	Atochem 						foams
            February 28, 1992.

     	60.	Reliance Laboratories, Inc. 				CBI
            February 28, 1992.

     	61.	CFC Alliance for Responsible CFC Policy  	policy comments
            March 2, 1992.

     	62.	Chem-Tech International	 			solvents
            February 226, 1992.

     	63.	Albers Air Conditioning Corp 			refrigeration
            February 26, 1992.

     	64.	AT&T						policy comments
            March 2, 1992.

     	65.	Intel Corporation 					semiconductors
            March 2, 1992.

     	66.	3M	 						solvents, aerosols
            March 2, 1992.

     	67.	(Submission removed)

     	68.	Kleer-Flo Company 					solvents
            March 2, 1992.

     	69.	Yokogawa Corporation of America			refrigerants
            February 14, 1992.

     	70.	Atcor 							solvents
            March 2, 1992.

     	71.	DuPont		 				policy comments
            March 2, 1992

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.D

     	72.	Millipore 						CBI
            February 28, 1992.

     	73.	Swen Sonic Corp 					solvents
            February 27, 1992.

     	74.	Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers	refrigerants
            March 2, 1992.

     	75.	Halogenated Solvents Industry Alliance (HSIA)  	solvents
            March 2, 1992

     	76.	Rochester Midland 					solvents
            February 12, 1992.

    	77.	Spec-Air 						refrigeration
            February 13, 1992.

     	78.	Amana 						refrigeration
            February 26, 1992.

     	79.	Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company	       foams
            March 2, 1992.

     	80.	General Electric 					refrigeration, foams
            March 2, 1992.

     	81.	General Latex and Chemical Corporation		foam
            February 27, 1992.

     	82.	South Coast Air Quality Management District   	fire
            February 18, 1992.			           extinguishers (halon)

     	83.	Tektronix						solvents
            March 2, 1992.

     	84.	Arctic Chill 						refrigeration
            February 28, 1992.

     	85.	Rite Off Aerosol Products 				solvents, aerosols
            February 28, 1992.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.D

     	86.	Airco 							tobacco expansion
            February 5, 1992.

     	87.	Schumacher 						silicon oxidation
            March 2, 1992

     	88.	TG (U.S.A.) 					foams
            March 6, 1992.

     	89.	Robert E. Jones Co.					refrigeration
            March 2, 1992

     	90.	Dow							foams
            March 10, 1992

     	91.	CRC Industries					solvents
            February 28, 1992

     	92.	Hastings						refrigeration

     	93.	Center for Emissions Control			refrigeration, solvents,
            March 12, 1992 					foam, aerosols, adhesives, coatings and inks

     	94.	Miller-Stephenson					solvents
            March 13, 1992

     	95.	Castrol Inc. 						refrigeration
            March 9, 1992.

     	96.	Elf Atochem						refrigeration
            March 20, 1992

     	97.	Exxon							solvents
            March 27, 1992

     	98.	Allied-Signal						solvents
            March 26, 1992

     	99.	Dynamac Corporation				solvents
            March 31, 1992

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.D
     	100.	American Pacific Corp.				halons
            April 7, 1992

     	101.	Lajos Szucs and Jeffrey Griffith			refrigeration
            April 8, 1992

     	102.	International District Heating and Cooling Assoc.
            February 28, 1992					refrigeration

     	103.	Vulcan Chemicals 					solvents, foams
            March 2, 1992

     	104.	Aerotech Labs					pesticides, aerosols
            March 4, 1992

     	105.	Hurri-Kleen Corporation				solvents
            April 20, 1992

     	106.	Applied Environmental Technologies 	  	solvents
            April 19, 1992

     	107.	Lorrillard Tobacco Company			tobacco expansion
            April 28, 1992

     	108.	DuPont						refrigerants
            April 24, 1992

     	109.	Hoechst Celanese					refrigerants
            May 12, 1992

     	110.	3M							solvents, fire extinguishing
            May 11 & 14, 1992    	              		(halon), refrigerants

     	111.	Albers A/C						air conditioning
            May 12, 1992

     	112.	Great Lakes Chemical				fire extinguishing (halon)
            April 23, 1992

     	113.	Kyzen Corporation					solvents
            May 21, 1992

     	114.	Boston Whaler, Inc.					foams
            May 22, 1992

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.D

     	115.	3M							(testing protocol)
            June 10, 1992

     	116.	Oxychem						solvents,pesticides,
            June 24, 1992					aerosols, adhesives, coatings, inks.

     	117.	Envirosolv						solvents
            May 29, 1992

     	118.	Becton Dickinson					solvents
            February 27, 1992 & June 30, 1992

     	119.	Environmental Technology     		 	solvents
            July 16, 1992

     	120.	LPS Laboratories 					solvents
            July 13, 1992.

     	121.	Elf Atochem						foams
  		July 23, 1992

     	122.	Ansul Fire Protection				halons
            August 19, 1992

     	123.	Dow Corning						solvents
            August 6, 1992

     	124.	Great Lakes Chemical				CBI
            August 13, 1992

     	125.	Great Lakes Chemical				CBI
            August 17, 1992

     	126.	Great Lakes Chemical				CBI
            August 18, 1992

     	127.	Utah Power						leak detection on
            May 19, 1992					generator cooling systems and condensers

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.D
      128.	CRC Industries					CBI
            July 17, 1992

     	129.	Enviro Tech Int.					solvents
            August 29, 1992

     	130.	Infiltec						fire extinguishing (halon)
            September 2, 1992

    	131.	Brulin Corporation					solvents
            September 2, 1992

     	132.	OZ Technologies					CBI
            September 29, 1992

     	133.	Sunshine Makers Inc.				solvents
            October 2, 1992

     	134. 	Storchem Inc.					solvents
            October 5, 1992

     	135. 	Dow Corning						solvents
            October 13, 1992

     	136. 	Hughes						solvents
           	October 22, 1992

     	137.	Pennsylvania Engineering Co.			CBI
            November 9, 1992

     	138. 	Naval Surface Warfare Center			foams
            November 13, 1992

     	139.	Betz MetChem					solvents
            November 12, 1992

     	140.	Praxair, Inc.						sterilants
            November 10, 1992

     	141.   Marioff						fire suppression (halon)
            November 30, 1992

     	142.	Sintef							air conditioning                  November 20, 1992

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.D

     	143.	Submission withdrawn

     	144. 	Insitu Environmental Chemical Co.  	  		solvents
            December 12, 1992

     	145. 	Rochester Midland						CBI
            December 17, 1992

      146.	Olin Chemicals						solvents
            February 9, 1993

      147.	Roy Research and Technology				CBI
            May 5, 1992

      148.	Dynamold Solvents, Inc.					solvents
            February 26, 1993

      149.	DuPont Fluorochemicals					halons
            May 14, 1990

      150.	DuPont Fluorochemicals					halons
            January 25, 1993

      151.	Walter Kidde Aerospace, Inc.				halons
            March 30, 1993

      152.	Polyisocyanurate Insulation Manufacturers Assoc.	foams
            September 13, 1991

      153.	Crain Industries.						foams
            March 17, 1993

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY II.F

Interagency Review Materials

II.F.	1.	Draft Proposed Rule Transmitted to OMB.  October 14, 1992.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.A

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

III.A.	1. 	Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.  Signed by EPA Administrator, Carol Browner on April 23, 1993.  Published May 12, 1993.  58 FR 28094

      2.	CBI Alternatives Listed Under the SNAP Program.  April 23, 1993.

	Docket A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

Proposed Support Document

III.B.	1.	U.S. EPA.  1992.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Aerosols.  Draft. Office of Air and Radiation, December 4, 1992.

      2.	U.S. EPA.  1992.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Adhesives, Coatings, and Inks.  Draft. Office of Air and Radiation, December 4, 1992.

      3.	U.S. EPA.  1992.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Foam-Blowing Agents.  Draft. Office of Air and Radiation, December 4, 1992.

      3a.	U.S. EPA.  1993.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Foam-Blowing Agents.  Addendum.  Draft. Office of Air and Radiation, March 31, 1993.

      4.	U.S. EPA.  1992.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Solvent Cleaning.  Draft. Office of Air and Radiation, December 4, 1992.

      5.	U.S. EPA.  1992.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Refrigeration and Air Conditioning.  Draft. Office of Air and Radiation, December 4, 1992.

      5a.	U.S. EPA.  1993.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Refrigeration and Air Conditioning.  Addendum.  Draft. Office of Air and Radiation, March 31, 1993.

      6.	U.S. EPA.  1992.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Fire Extinguishing and Protection (Halon Substitutes).  Draft. Office of Air and Radiation, December 1, 1992.

      7.	U.S. EPA.  1992.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Sterilization.  Draft. Office of Air and Radiation, December 8, 1992.

      8.	Alternative Fluorocarbons Environmental Acceptability Study (AFEAS).  1991.  "Kinetics and Mechanisms for the Reactions of Halogenated Organic Compounds in the Troposphere."  STEP-HALOCSIDE/AFEAS Workshop.  Dublin, Ireland.  May 14-16, 1991.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

      9.	American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH).  1986.  Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, Fifth Edition.  ACGIH.  Cincinnati, Ohio.

      10.	ACGIH.  1982.  Industrial Ventilation:  A Manual of Recommended Practice, 17th Edition.  Chapter 4.

      11.	American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA).  1989.  Concepts and Procedures for the Development of Emergency Response Planning Guidelines (ERPGs).  AIHA ERPG Committee.  December 1989.

      12.	American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (ASHRAE). 1991.  Standard 15, Safety Code for Mechanical Refrigeration, and Standard 34, Refrigerants.  American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.  March 1991.

      13.	Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM).  1992.  Statement of the AHAM to the U.S. EPA on the Phase Out Date for CFC 11 and 12 for the U.S. Household Refrigera - tor, Refrigerator-Freezer and Freezer Industry.  Submission to EPA in response to ANPRM.  February 14, 1992.

      14.	Aucott, Michael.  1990.  Feasibility of CFC-12 Reclamation from Salvaged Vehicles.  Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Solid Waste Management, State of New Jersey.  December 14, 1990.

      15.	Automotive Refrigeration Products Institute.  1988.  1988 Private Sector Vehicle Refrigerant Consumption Study.  Automotive Refrigeration Products Institute, Lanham, MD.

      16.	Bruce Company, The.  1992.  Screening Levels for Potential Human Chronic Exposure Through the Aqueous Route to CFC Substitutes from Metals and Electronics Cleaning Operations.  Memo from Roxanne Bogart, The Bruce Company, to Kate Rantz, ICF Incorporated.   April 3, 1992. (April 2 reference incorrect)

      17.	Bullington, S., and N. Kaczmarek (Dow Chemical Co.).  1984.  "Formulating Gravure Inks with 1,1,1-Trichloroethane and Methylene Chloride."  American Ink Maker.  June 1984.

      18.	Celotex Corporation.  1987.  Rigid Insulating Foam:  CFC/Ozone Issue.  February 5, 1987.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

      19.	Celotex Corporation.  1977.  Comments on Nonaerosol Propellant Uses of Fully Halogenated Halocarbons.  Submitted to EPA.  October 26, 1977.

      20.	Center for Emission Control (CEC).  1991.  Flexible Polyurethane Foam Manufac - ture:  An Assessment of Emission Control Options.  October 1991.

      21.	Chemical Marketing Reporter.  1992.  "Chemical Profile: 1,1,1 - Trichloroethane."  Vol. 241, Iss. 4, p. 42.  January 27, 1992.

      22.	Chemical Marketing Reporter.  1991.  "U.S. Regs Catalyze Changes in Solvents."  p. 5.  January 21, 1991.

      23.	Chemical Marketing Reporter.  1990.  "Methyl Chloroform is Seen as a Major Problem for Ozone."  p. 9.  June 25, 1990.

      24.	Chemical Marketing Reporter.  1989.  "Chemical Profile: 1,1,1 - Trichloroethane."  p. 46.  January 30, 1989.

      25.	Chemical Week.  1992.  "Adhesives and Sealants: Innovating Under Pressure."  p. 26.  March 11, 1992.

      26.	Chemical Week.  1992.  "Formulators Pace Environmental Laws."  p. 34. March 11, 1992.

      27.	Chemical Rubber Company.  1984.  CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 64th Edition.  Boca Raton, Florida:  CRC Press, Inc.

      28.	Chilton.  1985.  Chilton's Guide to Air Conditioning Repair and Service.  Rador, PA:  Chilton Book Company.

      29.	Clement Associates Inc.  1989.  Comparison of Exposure Assumptions in Versar Report and Vintaging Model - Update of July 14, 1989 Memo.  Memorandum from Lou Borghi of Clement Associates to Karla Perri of U.S. EPA.  July 28, 1989.

      30.	Dombrowski, Stan (Dow Chemical Co).  1990.  "Study Supports Industry Position On Use of 1,1,1-Trichloroethane."  Modern Paint and Coatings.  April 1990.

      31.	Gosselin, R.E., R.P. Smith, H.C. Hodge, and J.E. Braddock.  1984.  Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products, Fifth Edition.  Los Angeles:  Williams & Wilkins.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

      32.	Halogenated Solvents Industry Alliance (HSIA).  1991.  "1,1,1-Trichloroethane (Methyl Chloroform) White Paper."  May 1991.

      33.	Healthcare Hazardous Materials Management.  1990.  "EtO Phone Home: The Future of Sterilization in Hospitals."  Vol. 3, Iss. 10.  July 1990.

      34.	Hickory Springs (McNair Law Firm, P.A.).  1992.  Submission to EPA on behalf of Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company in response to ANPRM.  January 16, 1992.

      35.	ICF Incorporated.  1992.  Releases of Substitutes in the Aerosol/Pressurized Dispensor Sector.  Memo from Farzan Riza and Keith Bowers of ICF Incorporated to Nina Bonnelycke and Elaine Haemisigger of the US EPA Office of Air and Radiation, Global Change Division.  March 30, 1992.

      36.	Isaksen, I.S.A.  1986.  "Ozone Perturbation Studies in a Two Dimensional Model with Temperature Feedbacks in the Stratosphere Included."  Presented at UNEP Workshop on the Control of Chlorofluorocarbons.  Leesburg, Virginia.  September 1986.

      37.	Jarabek, A.M. and V. Hasselblad.  1991.  "Inhalation Reference Concentration Methodology:  Impact of Dosimetric Adjustments and Future Directions Using the Confidence Profile Method."  Presented at 84th Annual Meeting and Exhibition.  Vancouver, B.C.  June 16-21, 1991.

      38.	Jensen, Rolf.  1972.  "Halogenated Extinguishing Agent Systems."  Fire Journal.  Vol. 66, No. 3, pp. 37-39.  May 1972.

      39.	Kawai, T., K. Yamaoka, Y. Uchida, and M. Ikeda.  1991.  "Exposure of 1,1,1-tri - chloro - ethene and Dose-related Excretion of Metabolites in Urine of Printing Workers."  Toxicology Letters.  Vol. 55, pp. 39-45.

      40.	Keup, Lowell E.  1985.  "Flowing Water Resources."  Water Resources Bulletin.  Vol. 21, No. 2, p. 291.  April 1985.

      41.	Ko, M.K.W., G. Molnar, D. Chang, and N.D. Sze.  1991.  Preliminary Report on the Greenhouse Warming Potential of C5F12 and C6F14.  January 5, 1991.

      42.	Laniak, G., and S. Hwang.  1991.  Indoor Exposure to CFC Substitutes Emitted from Foam Board Insulation:  An Uncertainty Analysis.  U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, and Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

      43.	Lapp, Thomas W.  1990.  Assessment of Risks Resulting From Combustion of Used Oils in Selected Devices.  Memo from Thomas W. Lapp, Midwest Research Institute, to Vivian Williams, U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste.  August 31, 1990.

      44.	Lavelle, James P.  1989.  "Flammability Characteristics of HCFC 141b and HCFC 142b."  Journal of Fire Sciences.  Vol. 7, pp. 426-439.

      45.	Arthur D. Little, Inc.  1991.  Comparison of Global Warming Implications of Cleaning Technologies Using a Systems Approach, Volume 1.  Report to AFEAS.  August 23, 1991.

      46.	Nagda, N.L., M.D. Koontz, and H.E. Rector.  1985.  Guidelines for Monitoring Indoor Air Quality.  New York:  Hemisphere Publishing.

      47.	National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).  1989.  An Assessment Model for Atmospheric Composition.  National Aeronautics and Space Administration Conference Publication 3023.

      48.	National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).  1990.  Chapter 4: "The Halogenated Extinguishing Agents."  Fire Protection Handbook, 14th Edition.  Boston:  NFPA.  September 1990.

      49.	National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).  1990.  NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards.  Washington, D.C.:  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  NIOSH Pub. No. 90-117.

      50.	NIOSH.  Health Hazard Evaluations Nos. 83-296-1491, 81-370-1050, 83-089-1329, 76-24-350, 83-164-1377, 83-170-1346, and 80-87-708, 85-268-1641, 75-158-299, 81-310-1039, 81-106-1003, 81-261-1085.

      51.	NIOSH.  1978.  Fluorocarbons--An Industrial Hygiene Survey of Worker Exposure in Four Facilities.  Report No. NIOSH 79-101.

      52.	NIOSH (Mutchler, J.E.).  1973.  "Principles of Ventilation."  The Industrial Environment--It's Evaluation and Control.  NIOSH, Center for Disease Control, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  ch. 39.

      53.	National Research Council (NRC).  1986.  Criteria and Methods for Preparing Emergency Exposure Guidance Level (EEGL), Short-term Public Emergency Guidance Level (SPEGL), and Continuous Exposure Guidance Level (CEGL) Documents.  Committee on Toxicology.  Washington, DC:  National Academy Press.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

      54.	Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).  1992.  Ethylene Oxide:  A Case Study in Hazard Identification, OSHA Regulation, and Market Response,  Final Report.  Prepared for the Office of Program Evaluation, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., by Meridian Research, Inc.  July 21, 1992.

      55.	Oteiza, R. M. (Dow Chemical Co.).  1983.  "The Solvent Option for Air Quality Compliance."  American Ink Maker.  September 1983.

      56.	Parks, Dennis.  1992.  "On Hardwood: Clean Up Your Act."  Flooring.  March 1992.  p. 4.

      57.	Pulley, David (Naval Air Development Center, Warminster, PA).  1989.  "Compliant Coatings Perform in Aerospace Applications."  Modern Paint and Coatings.  September 1989.

      58.	Radian Corporation.  1992.  Letter from Christine Illig, Radian, to Kate Rantz, ICF.  April 22, 1992.

      59.	Radian Corporation.  1992.  Letter from Christine Illig, Radian, to Kate Rantz, ICF.  April 7, 1992.

      60.	Radian Corporation.  1992.  Letter from Chrisanti R. Haretos, Radian, to Nina Bonnelycke, U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation.  January 31, 1992.

      61.	Radian Corporation.  1992.  Releases of Aqueous and Semi-Aqueous Substitutes from Metals and Electronics Cleaning Operations.  Memo from Richard Weisman, Kim Cook, and Christine Illig, Radian, to Nina Bonnelycke and Elaine Haemisegger, U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation.  January 7, 1992.

      62.	Radian Corporation.  1991.  Model Processes for Aqueous and Semi-Aqueous Cleaners in the Metals and Electronics Industries.  Memo from Richard Weisman and Kim Cook, Radian Corporation, to Nina Bonnelycke and Elaine Haemisegger, U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation.  December 23, 1991.

      63.	Radian Corporation.  1987.  Maximum Individual Risk from the Organic Solvent Cleaning Project.  Memo from Ruth Mead, Radian, to Dave A. Beck, D.A., U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation.  December 28, 1987.

      64.	Radian Corporation.  1987.  Documentation of Revised HEM Inputs for the Organic Solvent Cleaning Project.  Memo from Ruth Mead, Radian, to Dave A. Beck, D.A., U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation.  September 3, 1987.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

      65.	Ravishankara, A.R., S. Solomon. A.A. Turnipseed, R.F. Warren.  1992. "Atmospheric Lifetimes of Long-Lived Species." Science, in press.

      66.	Rybny, Charles (Penn Color, Inc., Doylestown, PA).  1984.  "Dispersions for Exempt Ink Formulations."  American Ink Maker.  June 1984.

      67.	Shannon, Richard. (Jamestown Paint and Varnish Co, Jamestown, PA).  1982.  "Chlorinated-Solvent-Based Coatings."  Modern Paint and Coatings.  March 1982.

      68.	Society of the Plastics Industry and Polyurethane Insulation Manufacturer's Association (SPI & PIMA).  1992.  Decomposition of HCFC-123 and HCFC-141b in Foam-Blowing Applications:  Summary Report.  January 3, 1992.

      69.	Systems Applications International.  1990.  VOC Analysis Support.  Memorandum from Steve Reid, SAI to Shailendra Reddy, ICF.  March 19, 1992.

      70.	Tang, Y., M.J. Molina.  1991.  Atmospheric Chemistry of Perfluorinated Organic Compounds:  Summary Report.  September 1991.

      71.	United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).  1991.  Solvents, Coatings, and Adhesives Report.  United Nations Environmental Programme, Pursuant to Article Six of the Montreal Protocol.

      72.	UNEP.  1991.  Aerosol Products, Sterilants, Miscellaneous Uses and Carbon Tetrachloride, Technical Options Committee.  United Nations Environmental Programme, Pursuant to Article Six of the Montreal Protocol.

      73.	UNEP.  1991.  1991 UNEP Flexible and Rigid Foams Technical Options Report. United Nations Environmental Programme, Pursuant to Article Six of the Montreal Protocol.

      74.	UNEP.  1989.  Final Report of the Halons - Technical Options Committee.   United Nations Environmental Programme.  August 11, 1989.

      75.	U.S. Department of Commerce.  1986.  State and Metropolitan Area Data Book.  Bureau of the Census.

      75a.	U.S. Department of Commerce.  1990.  Regional Projections to 2040.  Bureau of Economic Analysis.  June, 1990.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

      76.	U.S. EPA.  1992.  Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.  Annual Update.  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment.  Cincinnati, OH.  OHEA ECAO-CIN-821.

      77.	U.S. EPA.  1992.  Integrated Risk Information System.  On-line Agency database.

      78.	No document catalogued under this reference number.

      79.	U.S. EPA.  1992.  Treatability of Components of Aqueous Cleaners.  Memo from Robert Boethling and David Lynch, U.S. EPA, Exposure Assessment Branch, to Nina Bonnelycke, U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation.  May 29, 1992.

      80.	U.S. EPA.  1992.  Regulatory Impact Analysis: Compliance with Section 604 of the Clean Air Act for the Phaseout of Ozone Depleting Substances, Appendix A.  Prepared by ICF Incorporated for the Office of Air and Radiation.  Washington, D.C.  March 12, 1992.

      81.	U.S. EPA.  1992.  Draft Background Document on Aerosol and Foam Products that Contain Class II Substances.  Prepared by ICF Incorporated for the Office of Air and Radiation, Global Change Division.  March 1992.

      82.	U.S. EPA.  1992.  Market Penetration by Halon Replacements, Draft Report.  Prepared by New Mexico Engineering Research Institute (NMERI)for the Global Change Division.  May 1992.

      83.	U.S. EPA. 1992.  Halon Uses and Substitutes, Draft Report.  Prepared by the New Mexico Engineering Research Institute (NMERI) for the Global Change Division.   April 1992.

      84.	U.S. EPA.  1992.  Revised Draft Report on the Use and Substitutes for Class I Substances in Aerosol Products/Pressurized Dispensers.  Prepared by ICF Incorporated for the Office of Air and Radiation, Global Change Division.  May 22, 1992.

      85.	U.S. EPA.  1992.  Draft Background Document on Identification of Nonessential Products that Release Class I Substances.  Prepared by ICF Incorporated for the Office of Air and Radiation, Global Change Division.   November 1992.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

      86.	U.S. EPA.  1991.  Risk Assessment of Flammable Refrigerants for Use in Home Appliances, Revised Draft Report.  Prepared by Arthur D. Little, Inc. for the Global Change Division.  September 10, 1991.

      87.	U.S. EPA.  1991.  Banning Nonessential Products That Release Class I or Class II Substances.  The Nonessential Products Subcommittee, Stratospheric Ozone Protection Advisory Committee.  U.S. EPA.  April 1991.

      88.	U.S. EPA.  1991.  Manual for Non-CFC Aerosol Packaging:  Conversion From CFC to Hydrocarbon Propellants.  Office of Air and Radiation, Research Triangle Park, N.C.  September 1991.  EPA-600/2-91-056.

      89.	U.S. EPA.  1991.  Results of Employee Exposure Monitoring For HCFC-123 at Centrifugal Chiller Installations.  Final Report.  Prepared by Meridian Research Inc. for the Global Change Division.  November 1991.

      90.	U.S. EPA.  1991.  Draft Regulatory Impact Analysis:  Compliance with Section 604 of the Clean Air Act for the Phaseout of Ozone-depleting Chemicals.  Appendix A.  Prepared by ICF Incorporated for the Office of Air and Radiation.  June 1991.

      91.	U.S. EPA.  1990.  External Review Draft, Aqueous and Terpene Cleaning, Interim Report.  Office of Toxic Sub - stances.  November 1990.

      92.	U.S. EPA.  1990.  External Review Draft, Hydrofluorocarbons and Hydrochlorofluorocarbons, Interim Report.  Office of Toxic Sub - stances.  November 1990.

      93.	U.S. EPA.  1990.  Interim Methods for Development of Inhalation Reference Concentrations, Review Draft.  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC.  EPA 600/8-90/066A.  August 1990.

      94.	U.S. EPA.  1990.  User's Manual for EPA's Composite Model for Landfills (EPACML) (and Attachment).  Office of Solid Waste.  February 1990.

      95.	U.S. EPA.  1990.  Subtitle D Risk Model Background Document, Appendix A, Failure/Release Submodel.  Prepared by DPRA Inc. for the Office of Solid Waste.  December 1990.

      96.	U.S. EPA.  1990.  Revised Draft:  Occupational Exposure and Environmental Release Data for Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and Their Substitutes.  Prepared by PEI Associates for the Office of Toxic Substances.
	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

      97.	U.S. EPA.  1990.  Occupational Exposure, Environmental Release, and Control Analysis of Aqueous Cleaning Substitutes for 1,1,1-Trichloroethane and CFC-113 for Cleaning of Electronic or Metal Objects, Revised Draft.  Prepared by PEI Associates for the Office of Toxic Substances.  September 20, 1990.

      98.	U.S. EPA.  1990.  Occupational Exposure, Environmental Release, and Control Analysis of Terpene Metal Cleaning Substitutes for 1,1,1-Trichloroethane and CFC-113, Revised Draft.  Prepared by PEI Associates for the Office of Toxic Substances.  September 19, 1990.

      99.	U.S. EPA.  1990.  Final Report.  User's Guide for the Urban Airshed Model.  Volume IV:  User's Guide for the Emissions Preprocessor System.  Prepared by Systems Applications Inc. for the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.  June 22, 1990.

      100.	U.S. EPA.  1990.  Revised Draft Final Report:  Consumer Exposure to Chlorinated Fluorocarbons (CFCs) and CFC Substitutes.  Prepared by Versar for the Office of Toxic Substances.  June 19, 1990.

      101.	U.S. EPA.  1989.  Aerosol Industry Success In Reducing CFC Propellant Usage.  Prepared for Office of Air and Radiation by Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC.  November 1989.  EPA-600/2-89-062.

      102.	U.S. EPA. 1989.   Alternative Formulations to Reduce CFC Use in U.S. Exempted and Excluded Aerosol Products.  Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC.  November 1989.  EPA-600/2-89-061.

      103.	U.S. EPA.  1989.  Use and Substitutes Analysis of Methyl Chloroform (1,1,1-Trichloroethane).  Prepared by ICF Incorporated for the Office of Air and Radiation, Global Change Division.  February 1989.

      104.	U.S. EPA.  1988.  Use and Substitutes Analysis of Chlorinated Solvents in Aerosols.  Prepared by ICF Incorporated for the Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Regulatory Impacts Branch.  April 1988.

      105.	U.S. EPA.  1988.  Anthropogenic Emissions Data for the 1985 NAPAP Inventory.  Research and Development/National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP).  EPA 600/7-88-022.  November 1988.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

      106.	U.S. EPA.  1988.  Recommendations for and Documentation of Biological Values for Use in Risk Assessment.  Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH.  February 1988.

      107.	U.S. EPA.  1987.  Assessing the Risks of Trace Gases that can Modify the Stratosphere.  Washington, D.C.  Office of Air and Radiation.  December 1987.

      108.	U.S. EPA.  1987.  Industrial Source Complex (ISC) Dispersion Model.  Addendum to the User's Guide.  Research Triangle Park, NC.

      109.	U.S. EPA.  1987.  The Risk Assessment Guidelines of 1986.  Office of Health and Environmental Assessment.  Washington, DC.  EPA/600/8-87/045.

      110.	U.S. EPA.  1987.  Final Report.  Control Technology Overview Report:  CFC Emissions from Rigid Foam Manufacturing.  Prepared by Radian Corp. for the Office of Air and Radiation.  September 30, 1987.

      111.	U.S. EPA.  1987.  National List of Aerosol Packagers.  Prepared by Radian Corp. for the Chemicals and Petroleum Branch.  Research Triangle Park, NC.

      112.	U.S. EPA.  1987.  Methods for Assessing Exposure to Chemical Substances.  Volume 12, Methods for Estimating the Concentration of Chemical Substances in Indoor Air.  Office of Toxic Substances.  Report No. EPA/560-5-85-016.

      113.	U.S. EPA.  1986.  Industrial Source Complex (ISC) Dispersion Model User's Guide, Second Edition, Volumes 1 and 2.  Publication Nos. EPA-450/4-86-005a, and -005b.  Research Triangle Park, NC. (NTIS PB86 234259 and PB86 234267).

      114.	Winchester, R.V. and V.M. Madjar.  1986.  "Solvent Effects on Workers in the Paint, Adhesive and Printing Industries."  Annals of Occupational Hygiene.  Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 307-317.

      115.	Whitehead, L.W., G.L. Ball, L.J. Fine, and G.D. Langolf.  1984.  "Solvent Vapor Exposures in Booth Spray Painting and Spray Glueing, and Associated Operations."  American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal.  Vol. 45, No. 11, pp. 767-772.  November 1984.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

	PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS

      116.	Amway.  1992.  March 11.  Ted Joppie, ADA, MI. Telephone Conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      117.	Anderson, Kent.  1992.  May 5. Phone conversation between Mark Radka, ICF Incorporated, and Kent Anderson, Chairman of the International Institute of Ammonia Refrigeration.  [refrigerants]

      118.	Atochem.  1992.  June 11.  Personal communication with Gene Laughlin and Bergrand Nusbaumer.  [foams]

      119.	Beck, Dave.  Personal communication.  EPA/OAQPS/ESD, June 15, 1992. [solvents]

      120.	Blue Coral Inc. (Westley).  1992.  March 11. Richard Pearl, Cleveland, OH. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      121.	Blue Coral Inc. (Westley).  1992.  March 19.  Richard Pearl, Cleveland, OH. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      122.	Calhoun, Jim, White Consolidated.  1992.  June 16.  Personal communication.  [foams]

      123.	Chem Tech.  1992.  March 19.  Carl Saake, St. Louis, MO. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      124.	Consolidated Printing Inks Co.  1992.  July 29.  Jim Master, West St. Paul, MN.  Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      125.	CRC Chemical.  1992.  March 11.  John Fischer, Warminster, PA. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      126.	Diamond "W".  1992.  August 24.  Dennis Parks, San Diego, CA.  Telephone conversations with Dan Prieto, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

      127.	Dow Chemical.  1992.  July 23.  Jim Mertens, Midland, MI.  Telephone conversation with Dan Prieto, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      128.	Dow Chemical.  1992.  March 9.  Jim Mertens, MI. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      129.	Dow Chemical.  1992.  July 15.  Jim Mertens, Midland, MI.  Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      130.	Dow Chemical.  1992.  July 21.  Jim Mertens, Midland, MI.  Telephone conversation with Dan Prieto, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      131.	Dow Chemical.  1992.  August 12.  Doug Crouch, Midland, MI.  Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      132.	Dow Chemical.  1992.  August 31.  Jim Mertens, Midland, MI.  Telephone conversation with Dan Prieto, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      133.	Dupont.  1992.  March 25.  John Leuszler, Morristown, NJ. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      134.	Dupont. 1992.  March 19.  John Leuszler, Morristown, NJ. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      135.	E. R. Carpenter Co. Inc.  1992.  August 24.  Mike Hollander.  Telephone conversation with Dan Prieto, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      136.	E.R. Carpenter Co. Inc.  1992.  August 24. Barry Cohoon, Russellville, KY.  Telephone conversation with Dan Prieto, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      137.	E.R. Carpenter Co. Inc.  1992.  July 23. Barry Cohoon, Russellville, KY.  Telephone conversation with Dan Prieto, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

      138.	Eastman Chemical.  1992.  July 20.  Ron Litton, Kingsport, TN.  Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      139.	Falcon Safety Poducts.  1992.  March 19.  Phil Labin, Sommerville, NJ. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      140.	Garden, Carton and Douglas.  1992.  March 19.  Mathuew Palche, Washington, D.C. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      141.	Guardsman Product Inc.  1992.  July 29.  Bud Schaedel, South Gate, CA.  Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      142.	Industrial Process Equipment.  1992.  July 30.  Ed Koeller, La Habra, CA.  Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      143.	Jamestown Paints & Varnish Co.  1992.  July 20.  Vic Santa Maria, Jamestown, PA.  Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      144.	Kiwi Brand Inc. 1992.  March 19.  Peter Burke, Douglasville, PA. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      145.	Lord Corp.  1992.  August 24.  Doug Green, Erie, PA.  Telephone conversation with Dan Prieto,ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      146.	Lord Corp.  1992.  August 31.  Doug Green, Erie, PA.  Telephone conversation with Dan Prieto,ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      147.	Madinabeitia, Dan.  1992.  February-May.  Personal communication.  [foams]

      148.	Midus Brakes.  1992.  March 10.  Rick Reuch, Washington, D.C. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

      149.	Miller Stevenson.  1992.  March 19.  Bill Brennen, Danbury, CT. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      150.	National Particleboard Association.  1992.  August 24.  John Bradfield, Gaithersburg, MD.  Telephone conversation with Dan Prieto, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      151.	Percy Harms Co.  1992.  March 10.  Lisa Kasper, Wheeling, IL. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      152.	Performance Coatings.  1992.  July 20.  Dore Morton, Ukiah, CA.  Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      153.	Perry, Bill.  Meridian Research Incorporated.  1992.  May.  Personal communi - cation.  [foams]

      154.	Perry Norway.  1992.  July 20.  Rob Cavalieri, Norway, MI.  Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      155.	Pillis, J.  1992.  May 5.  Phone conversation between Mark Radka, ICF Incorporated, and J. Pillis, Chief Engineer, the Frick Company.  [refrigerants]

      156.	PPG.  1992.  July 16.  Greg McCullen, Pittsburgh, PA.  Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      157.	Price-Discol.  1992.  March 19. Phil Barth, Farmingdale, NY. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      158.	Price-Discol.  1992.  March 25.  Jeff Otto, Farmingdale, NY. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      159.	Radiator Specialty.  1992.  March 19.  Guy Snow, Charlotte, NC. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

      160.	Radiator Specialty.  1992.  March 11.  Guy Snow, Charlotte, N.C. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      161.	Reid, Steven.  Systems Applications International (SAI).  1992.  May-June.  San Rafael, CA.  Personal communication.  [foams and refrigerants]

      162.	Reliance Universal.  1992.  July 21.  Ken Znidersic, Louisville, KY.  Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      163.	Safety Kleen.  1992.  March 11.  John Kusz, Elgin, IL. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      164.	Saturn Corp.  1992.  August 25.  William Miller, Spring Hill, KY.  Telephone conversation with Dan Prieto, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.   [adhesives]

      165.	Shephard, James.  1992.  May 4.  Phone conversation between Mark Radka, ICF Incorporated, and James Shephard, Vice President of Engineering, Lewis Energy Systems, and Chair of the ASHRAE Technical Committee on Custom Refrigeration Systems.  [refrigerants]

      166.	Society of the Plastics Industry.  1992.  March.  Personal communication.  [foams]

      167.	Spontex Co.  1992.  March 10.  Bob Beuerlein, Columbia, Tenn. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      168.	Sprayon.  1992.  March 26.  Richard Miller, Anaheim, CA. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      169.	Sprayon.  1992.  March 10.  Carol Crizan, Anaheim, CA. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      170.	Stewart Brothers.  1992.  July 20.  Ron Lyons, Alliance, OH.  Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY III.B

      171.	Sunbelt Coatings Inc.  1992.  July 29.  Tim Harrington, Picayune, MS.  Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      172	Tech Spray.  1992.  March 19.  Bruce Riffel, Amarillo, TX. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      173.	Terco.  1992.  September, 14.  David Cull, Schamburg, Il.  Telephone Conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, DC.  [aerosols]

      174.	Testimony by Jerry Pool, Technical Director for Vita Foam Incorpo - rated, on behalf of the Polyurethane Foam Association at the public hearing on the proposed rule of methylene chloride at OSHA on September 16, 1992.  Industry communication with Sally Rand, EPA.  [foams]

      175.	Today and Beyond (Aqueous Cleaners).  Personal communication with Steve Roberts.  Telephone conversations and letter.  [solvents]

      176.	Uniroyal Adhesives and Sealants Co.  1992.  August 25.  Mishawaka, IN.  Telephone conversation with Dan Prieto, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [adhesives]

      177.	Unocal.  1992.  March 20.  Bob Heinrichts, Schaumburg, IL. Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.  [aerosols]

      178.	Werthan Industries Inc.  1992.  July 21.  Bill Wolf, Nashville, TN.  Telephone conversation with Joseph Baron, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C  [adhesives]

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY IV-A

IV-A	1.	U.S. EPA, ICOLP.  No-Clean Soldering to Eliminate CFC-113 and Methyl Chloroform Cleaning of Printed Circuit Boards.  October 1993.

      2.	U.S. EPA, ICOLP.  Eliminating CFC-113 and Methyl Chloroform in Aircraft Maintenance Procedures.  October 1993.

      3.	ICF Incorporated.  "Update on the Use of EtO/CO2 blends in the Sterilants Sector."  Memo from Mala Narain and Bernard Eydt to Kristin Saltonstall.  December 7, 1993.

      4.	ICF Incorporated.  "Evaluation of Federal Regulations and Industry Guidelines Governing Minimum Oxygen Levels in Work Ares Protected By Gaseous Total Flooding Fire Protection Systems."  Memo to Karen Metchis, EPA.  1993.

      5.	U.S. President William Clinton, U.S. Vice President Albert Gore.  The Climate Change Action Plan.  October 1993.

      6.	Meridian Research, Incorporated.  Assessment of Firefighter Exposure to HCFC-123 During Extinguishant Efficiency Tests Conducted at the United States Naval Air Station in Beaufort, South Carolina.  March 16, 1993.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY IV-C

IV-C	1.	Letters announcing publication of the SNAP proposed rule and EPA position on substitutes sent to all submitters of data prior to publication of the NPRM.  See Category II-D for a complete list of all submitters.  Sent by Kristin Saltonstall, EPA.  June 1, 1993.

      2.	Letter to Dave Catchpole, BP Exploration from Karen Metchis, EPA.  June 14, 1993.

      3.	Letter to Gary Lindgren, OZ Technology from Stephen Seidel, EPA.  June 22, 1993.

      4.	Letter to Mike Bennett, Halon Replacement Program for Aviation form Karen Metchis, EPA.  July 2, 1993.

      5.	Letter to James Mattil, Climatran Corp. from Paul Stoplman, EPA.  July 20, 1993.

      6.	Letter to Elio Guglielmi, North American Fire Guardian Technology, Inc. from Karen Metchis, EPA.  July 27, 1993.

      7.	Letter to J.S. Nicholas, Ansul Fire Protection from Karen Metchis, EPA.  July 27, 1993.

      8.	Letter to J. Micheal Kelly, Great Lakes Chemical from Karen Metchis, EPA.  July 27, 1993.

      9.	Letter to Gary Lindgren, OZ Technology from Paul Stolpman, EPA.  September 13, 1993.

      10.	Memo to Users of Perfluorocarbons.  From U.S. EPA, Stratospheric Protection Division, Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program.  November 1, 1993.

      11.	Letter to Jim Corley, OZ Technology from Jeffrey Levy, EPA.  November 8, 1993.

      12.	Letter to Gary Lindgren, OZ Technology from Paul Stolpman, EPA.  November 19, 1993.

      13.	Letter to Gary Lindgren, OZ Technology from Paul Stolpman, EPA.  November 29, 1993.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY IV-C
      14.	Letter to Michael Bennett, Wright Patterson AFB from Karen Metchis, EPA.
            May 17, 1993.

      15.	Letter to Michael Bennett, Wright Patterson AFB from Karen Metchis, EPA.  June 17, 1993.

      16.	Letter to Michael Bennett, Wright Patterson AFB from Karen Metchis, EPA.  October 6, 1993.

      17.	Letter to Sharon Gidumal, DuPont from Jeffrey Levy, EPA.  September 22, 1993.

      18.	Letter to Harold Lamb, Elf Atochem from Jeffrey Levy, EPA.  September 22, 1993.

      19.	Letter to David Hayes, Latham & Watkins from Drusilla Hufford, EPA.  January 25, 1994.

      20.	Letter to Gary Lindgren, Oz Technology from Jeffrey Levy, EPA.  January 26, 1994.

IV-D	1.	Edward A. Connell							comments
            May 27, 1993

      2.	Beckman Instruments, Inc.						comments
            May 28, 1993

      3.	DOW Chemical Co.							comments
            June 3, 1993

      4.	RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company					tobacco
            June 6, 1993								expansion

      5.	Toshiba Corp.							comments
            June 14, 1993

      6.	Institute for Research and Technical Assistance (IRTA)		comments
            June 14, 1993

      7.	U.S. Dept. of the Interior						comments
            June 15, 1993

      8.	CRC Industries							comments
            Undated

      9.	The Gates Corporations						comments
            June 17, 1993

      10.	Elf Atochem North America, Inc.					comments
            June 18, 1993

      11.	MG Industries							comments
            June 17, 1993

      12.	Ansul Fire Protection						comments
            June 17, 1993

      13.	Climatran Corporation 						comments
            Undated

      14.	Halotron, Inc.							comments
            June 21, 1993

IV-D	15.	OZ Technology, Inc.						comments

            May 26. 1993

      16.	Union Carbide Corporation						comments
            June 3, 1993

      17.	HSIA									comments
            June 7, 1993

      18.	BP Exploration							comments
            June 11, 1993

      19.	FES-Southwest, Inc.							comments
            June 17, 1993

      20.	United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural 			comments
            Implement Workers of America (UAW)
            June 15, 1993

      21.	Pennzoil Company							comments
            June 21, 1993

      22.	Dept. of the Navy							comments
            June 22, 1993

      23.	Factory Mutual Engineering						comments
            June 22, 1993

      24.	Falcon Safety Products, Inc.					comments
            June 10, 1993

      25.	Boeing								comments
            June 11, 1993

      26.	Colorim Inc.								comments
            June 11, 1993

      27.	Pilkington Barnes Hind						comments
            June 16, 1993

      28.	Spec-Air								comments
            June 17, 1993

IV-D	29.	CRC Industries, Inc.							comments
            June 17, 1993

      30.	Elf Atochem North America, Inc.					comments
            June 18, 1993

      31.	Cetylite Industries, Inc.						comments
            June 18, 1993

      32.	RegWest Co.								comments
            June 19, 1993

      33.	Ausimont USA, Inc.							comments
            June 21, 1993

      34.	Eli Lily and Co.							comments
            June 21, 1993

      35.	McDonnell Douglas							comments
            June 21, 1993

      36.	Allied Signal, Inc.							comments
            June 21, 1993

      37.	National Assoc. of State Fire Marshals (NASFM)			comments
            June 21, 1993

      38.	Santa Barbara Applied Optics					comments
            June 21, 1993

      39.	Duke Power								comments
            June 21, 1993

      40.	Alaska North Slope Operators					comments
            June 22, 1993

      41.	Lorillard Tobacco Co.						comments
            June 23, 1993

      42.	Hoechst Celanese Corp.						comments
            June 24, 1993

IV-D	43.	Pennsylvania Engineering Co.					comments
            June 24, 1993

      44.	Fike Protection Systems						comments

            June 24, 1993

      45.	Whirlpool Corp.							comments
            June 24, 1993

      46.	Exxon Chemical Co.						comments
            June 24, 1993

      47.	Monsanto Co.							comments
            June 24, 1993

      48.	Potomac Electric Power Co.					comments
            June 24, 1993

      49.	Fireline Corp.							comments
            June 24, 1993

      50.	Vulcan Chemicals							comments
            June 24, 1993

      51.	Carrier Corp.							comments
            June 25, 1993

      52.	Petroferm Inc.							comments
            June 25, 1993

      53.	Ausimont USA, Inc.							comments
            June 25, 1993

      54.	Merck & Co., Inc.							comments
            June 25, 1993

      55.	Halogenated Solvents Industry Alliance (HSIA) 			comments
            June 25, 1993

      56.	Dow Chemical Co.							comments
            June 25, 1993

IV-D	57.	National Refrigerants						comments
            June 25, 1993

      58.	Fire Suppression Systems Assoc. (FSSA)				comments
            June 25, 1993

      59.	Fire Protection Service, Inc.					comments
            June 25, 1993

      60.	J.W. Mossel & Associates						comments
            June 25, 1993

      61.	Great Lakes Chemical Corp.					comments
            June 25, 1993

      62.	Dow Corning								comments
            June 28, 1993

      63.	3M									comments
            June 28, 1993
            June 29, 1993

      64.	Du Pont								comments
            June 28, 1993

      65.	United States Surgical Corp.					comments
            June 28, 1993

      66.	General Electric Co.							comments
            June 28, 1993

      67.	The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. (SPI)			comments
            June 28, 1993

      68.	National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)			comments
            June 28, 1993

      69.	No item under this catalog number

      70.	AT&T								comments
            June 28, 1993

IV-D	71.	American Automobile Manufacturers Assoc. (AAMA) 		comments
            June 28, 1993

      72.	Chemical Manufacturers Assoc. (CMA)				comments
            June 28, 1993

      73.	IBM									comments

            June 28, 1993

      74.	Assoc. of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM)		comments
            June 28, 1993

      75.	Greenpeace								comments
            June 28, 1993

      76.	Center for Emissions Control (CEC)				comments
            June 28, 1993

      77.	Halon Alternatives Research Corp. (HARC)			comments
            June 28, 1993

      78.	American Electronics Assoc. (AEA)				comments
            June 28, 1993

      79.	National Automobile Dealers Assoc. (NADA)			comments
            June 28, 1993

      80.	Union Carbide Corp.						comments
            June 28, 1993

      81.	Dept. of Energy							comments
            June 28, 1993

      82.	Alliance for Responsible CFC Policy				comments
            June 28, 1993

      83.	Polyurethane Foam Assoc. (PFA)					comments
            June 28, 1993

      84.	Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Institute (ARI)		comments
            June 28, 1993

IV-D	85.	3M									comments
            June 28, 1993

      86.	Polyisocyanurate Insulation Manufacturers Assoc. (PIMA)	comments
            June 28, 1993

      87.	National Assoc. of Fire Equipment Distributors (NAFED)	comments
            June 28, 1993

      88.	Gebauer Co.								comments
            Undated

      89.	Chemical Manufacturers Assoc. (CMA)				comments
            June 28, 1993

      90.	DowElanco								comments
            June 28, 1993

      91.	Bourgeois & Associates, Inc.					comments
            June 28, 1993

      92.	Amana								comments
            June 23, 1993

      93.	Lintern Corp.							comments
            June 30, 1993

      94.	Keller Fire & Safety, Inc.						comments
            June 25, 1993

      95.	Hughes Associates, Inc.						comments
            June 29, 1993

      96.	Eastman								comments
            June 28, 1993

      97.	Amerex								comments
            June 28, 1993

      98.	Anchor Fire & Safety Equipment					comments
            June 26, 1993

IV-D	99.	Amerex								comments
            June 28, 1993

      100.	Robert M. Whitcom							comments
            June 2, 1993

      101.	Chemical Packaging Corp.						comments
            July 9, 1993

      102.	AT&T								comments

            July 9, 1993

      103.	Beckman								comments
            June 24, 1993

      104.	Fire Systems Marketing and Technical Services  FSM/TS	comments
            June 30, 1993

      105.	California Suppression System					comments
            July 1, 1993

      106.	Marvin Lewis							comments
            July 5, 1993

      107.	Pemall Fire Extinguishing Corp.					comments
            July 13, 1993

      108.	Northrop								comments
            February 25, 1993

      109.	Boeing								CBI
            April 23, 1993

      110.	The Rission Group							CBI
            May 5, 1993

      111.	Ken Seika Corp.							solvents
            Undated

      112.	Climatran								refrigerants
            May 24, 1993

IV-D	113.	Ansul Fire Protection							halons
            May 21, 1993

      114.	Dow Corning								solvents
            June 9, 1993

      115.	North American Environmental Oil 					halons, June 22, 1993solvents

      116.	OZ Technologies							refrigerants

            June 25 , 1993
      117.	Advanced Research Technologies					solvents
            July 2, 1993

      118.	DuPont Chemicals							refrigerants
            July 7, 1993

      119.	Securiplex								halons
            July 8, 1993

      120.	Lajos Szucs								refrigerants
            July 14, 1993

      121.	APD Cryogenics							refrigerants
            July 20, 1993

      122.	Kidde Fenwal							halons
            April 21, 1993

      123.	MacDermid								CBI
            May 7, 1993

      124.	Pennsylvania Engineering						sterilants
            June 15, 1993

      125.	Spectrex Inc.								halons
            September 20, 1993

      126.	North American Fire Guardian					halons
            May 20, 1993

IV-D	127.	Sunshine Makers, Inc.						solvents
            May 20, 1993

      128.	Storchem								CBI
            May 11, 1993

      129.	Specialty Protection Systems					comments
            July 19, 1993

      130.	CRC Industries							solvents
            July 20, 1993

      131. 	Martin Marietta							refrigerants
            July 12, 1993

      132.	Entropic Systems, Inc.						comments
            July 28, 1993

      133.	Roy Research and Technology					foams
            June 17, 1993

      134.	Zallen International Associates					CBI
            July 14, 1993

      135.	Tri-Signal Inc.							comments
            July 15, 1993

      136.	Great Lakes Chemical						refrigerants
            August 6, 1993

      137.	Ansul Fire Protection						comments
            July 15, 1993

      138.	BFPE International							comments
            August 9, 1993

      139.	Fire and Safety International					comments
            August 2, 1993

      140.	Purac America							CBI
            August 21, 1993

IV-D	141.	IRTA									comments
            August 2, 1993

      142.	Government Purchasing Project/Ozone Action			comments
            September 1, 1993

      143.	ARI									comments
            September 9. 1993

      144.	Hoechst Celanese							refrigerants
            September 13, 1993

      145.	Du Pont								CBI
            September 27, 1993

      146.	Ametek Microfoam Div. Inc.					foams
            October 4, 1993

      147.	Securiplex Technologies, Inc.					halons
            October 8, 1993

      148.	The SURVICE Engineering Co.					halons
            October 13, 1993

      149.	Oxychem								solvents
            October 13, 1993

      150.	Yates Fire Protection						halons
            October 28, 1993

      151.	Elf AtoChem								refrigerants
            October 18, 1993

      152.	IBM									comments
            October 11, 1993

      153.	U.S. Surgical Corp.							aerosols
            November 3, 1993

      154.	Rhône Poulenc Chemicals						refrigerants
            November 10, 1993

IV-D	155.	Solder Seal Chemicals and Rubber Products			comments
            October 26, 1993

      156.	Allied Signal								refrigerants
            November 11, 1993

      157.	Dow Chemical Company						refrigerants
            November 17, 1993

      158.	Great Lakes Chemical Corp.					halons
            October 15, 1993

      159.	DOW Chemical Co.							solvents
            November 30, 1993

      160.	DOW Chemical Co.							comments
            November 19, 1993

      161.	Du Pont Chemicals							refrigerants
            November 19, 1993

      162.	DOW Chemical Co.							comments
            December 3, 1993

      163.	Eagle Laboratories							solvents
            December 2, 1993

      164.	3M									refrigerants
            November 22, 1993

      165.	Micro Care Corp.							solvents
            December 7, 1993

      166.	Ausimont USA, Inc.							solvents
            December 17, 1993

      167.	Peoples Welding Supply						refrigerants
            December 13, 1993

      168.	CMA									comments
            December 13, 1993

IV-D	169.	3M	comments
            August 20, 1993

      170.	3M	comments
            December 2, 1993

      171.	Dept. of the Air Force	comments
            June 24, 1993

      172.	Naval Research Laboratory	halons
            August 22, 1990

      173.	Allied Signal Inc.	refrigerants
            December 15, 1993

      174.	Elf Atochem	refrigerants
            December 16, 1993

      175.	DOW Chemical Co.	comments
            December 17, 1993

      176.	Pennsylvania Engineering	sterilants
            December 21, 1993

      177.	U.S. Department of Labor	comments
            April 1, 1993

      178.	DuPont Chemicals	comments
            November 30, 1993

      179.	SPEC-AIR	comments
            December 15, 1993

      180.	Conlon, Frantz, Phelan, Knapp & Pires	comments
            December 15, 1993

      181.	DuPont Chemicals	refrigerants
            December 17, 1993

      182.	DuPont Chemicals	solvents
            December 10, 1993

      183.	DuPont Chemicals	solvents
            December 27, 1993

      184.	Intermagnetics Corporation	refrigerants
            December 30, 1993

      185.	Nat'l Highway Traffic Safety Administration	comments
            December 30, 1993

      186.	Asahi Glass Co.	solvents
            January 6, 1994

      187.	Assoc. of Home Appliance Manufacturers	foams
            January 25, 1994

      188.	American Automobile Manufacturers Association	refrigerants
            November 16, 1993

      189.	3M	comments
            September 30, 1993

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY IV-E
IV-E	1.	Summary of Meeting with Du Pont Corp.  July 12, 1993.

      2.	Summary of Phone Conversation with James Mattil, Climatran Corp.  July 19, 1993.

      3.	Summary of Phone Conversation with Union Carbide Corp.  July 28, 1993.

      4.	Summary of Meeting with Climatran Corp.  July 28, 1993.

      5.	Summary of Meeting with APD Cryogenics, Inc.  June 29, 1993.

      6.	Summary of Meeting with 3M Corp.  September 13, 1993.

      7.	Summary of Meeting with APD Cryogenics/Chrysler Corp.  September 9, 1993.

      8.	Summary of Meeting with American Electronics Assoc.  September 22, 1993.

      9.	Summary of Meeting with Climatran Corp.  October 18, 1993.

      10.	Summary of Meeting with APD Cryogenics.  October 21, 1993.

      11.	Summary of Industry Conference Call Concerning CAAA Sections 610 and 612 Regulation of HCFCs in the Fire Extinguishing Sector.  November 30, 1993.

      12.	Summary of Meeting with OSHA.  September 23, 1993.

      13.	Summary of Phone Conversation with Dick Gann, NIST.  December 17, 1993.

      14.	Summaries of phone conversations about use conditions on PFCs and HFC-23 with several public commenters.  September 17-November 16, 1993.

      15.	Summary of meeting about submission of FRIG-C.  February 1, 1994.

      16.	Summary of meeting about potential submission of hydrocarbon-based substitutes for CFC-12.  February 1, 1994.

      17.	Summary of phone conversation with 3M about PFCs in heat transfer end-uses.  February 1, 1994.

      18.	Summary of phone conversation with 3M on the treatment of CFCs under SNAP.  February 3, 1994.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY IV-F

Transcript of Hearings

IV-F	1.	Testimony of Charles A. Samuels, Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM).  May 28, 1993.

      2.	Testimony of Alliance for Responsible CFC Policy.  May 28, 1993.

      3.	Testimony of Sharon Gidumal, DuPont.  May 28, 1993.

      4.	Testimony of Michael Thelen, Dow Corning.  May 28, 1993.

      5.	Testimony of Robert M. Whitcom.  May 28, 1993.

      6.	Testimony of Michael I. Dougherty, 3M Company.  May 28, 1993.

      7.	Testimony of William R. Galloway, Petroferm Inc.  May 28, 1993.

      8.	Testimony of Bill Walsh, Greenpeace.  May 28, 1993.

      9.	Testimony of Edward A. Conner, CSP.  May 28, 1993.

      10.	Transcript - Public Hearing of Notice of Proposed Rule-Making on the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program.  May 28, 1993.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY V-A

Final Rulemaking

V-A	1.	Final Rulemaking.  Signed by EPA Administrator, Carol Browner on February 15, 1994.  Published March 18, 1994.  59 FR 13044.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY V-B

Support Documents

      1.	U.S. EPA.  1994.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Aerosols.  Office of Air and Radiation, March 15, 1994.

      1a.	U.S. EPA.  1994.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-		Depleting Substances:  Aerosols.  Addendum.  Office of Air and Radiation, 		March 15, 1994. (March 30, 1998)

      2.	U.S. EPA.  1994.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Adhesives, Coatings, and Inks.  Office of Air and Radiation, March 15, 1994

      3.	U.S. EPA.  1994.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Foam-Blowing Agents.  Office of Air and Radiation, March 15, 1994.

      4.	U.S. EPA.  1994.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Solvent Cleaning.  Office of Air and Radiation, March 15, 1994.

      4a.	U.S. EPA.  1994.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Solvent Cleaning.  Addendum.  Office of Air and Radiation, March 15, 1994.

      5.	U.S. EPA.  1994.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Refrigeration and Air Conditioning.   Office of Air and Radiation, March 15, 1994.

      5a.	U.S. EPA.  1994.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Refrigeration and Air Conditioning.  Addendum.  Office of Air and Radiation, March 15, 1994.

      6.	U.S. EPA.  1994.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Fire Extinguishing and Protection (Halon Substitutes).  Office of Air and Radiation, March 15, 1994

      6a.	U.S. EPA.  1994.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Fire Extinguishing and Protection (Halon Substitutes).  Addendum.  Office of Air and Radiation,  March 15, 1994.

      7.	U.S. EPA.  1994.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Sterilization.  Office of Air and Radiation, March 15, 1994.

      8.	U.S. EPA.  1994.  Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances:  Tobacco Expansion Sector.  Office of Air and Radiation, March 15, 1994.

	DOCKET A-91-42
	CATEGORY V-C
Comment Response Documents

      1.	U.S. EPA.  1994.  Response to Comments on the Significant New Alternatives Policy Rule.  Office of Air and Radiation, March 15, 1994.


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 34 (Friday, February 18, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9274-9276]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03459]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 34 / Friday, February 18, 2022 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0190; Project Identifier 2019-CE-048-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Bombardier Inc. and de Havilland, Inc.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
that published in the Federal Register. The NPRM proposed to issue an
airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to all Viking Air Limited
Model DHC-2 Mk. I, DHC-2 Mk. II, and DHC-2 Mk. III airplanes. As
published, the docket number referenced throughout is incorrect. This
document corrects that error. In all other respects, the original
document remains the same; however, for clarity, the FAA is publishing
the entire proposed rule in the Federal Register.

DATES: The last date for submitting comments on the NPRM (87 FR 7065,
February 8, 2022) remains March 25, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Viking Air
Limited Technical Support, 1959 De Havilland Way, Sidney, British
Columbia, Canada, V8L 5V5; phone: (North America)<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:
(250) 656-0673; email: [email protected]; website:
https://www.vikingair.com/support/service-bulletins. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (817)
222-5110.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0190; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, the MCAI,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aziz Ahmed, Aviation Safety Engineer,
FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2022-0190; Project Identifier
2019-CE-048-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
the proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Aziz
Ahmed, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590. Any commentary that the
FAA receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed
in the public docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    The FAA issued an NPRM (87 FR 7065, February 8, 2022) that would
apply to all Viking Air Limited (Viking) Model DHC-2 Mk. I, DHC-2 Mk.
II, and DHC-2 Mk. III airplanes. The NPRM proposed to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 64-09-03, Amendment 718 (29 FR 5390; April
22, 1964) (AD 64-09-03), which applies to all de Havilland (type
certificate now held by Viking) Model DHC-2 ``Beaver'' airplanes. AD
64-09-03 requires inspecting the aileron mass balance weight arms for
cracks and corrosion and replacing any damaged part.
    The NPRM proposed to require establishing a corrosion prevention
and control program to identify and correct corrosion. In the NPRM, the
FAA also proposed to require completing all of the initial tasks
identified in the program and reporting corrosion findings to Viking.
The NPRM was prompted by mandatory continued airworthiness information
(MCAI) issued by Transport Canada, which is the airworthiness authority
for Canada. Corrosion-related degradation, if not addressed, could lead
to structural

failure with consequent loss of control of the airplane.

Need for the Correction

    As published, the docket number referenced throughout the NPRM is
incorrect. The NPRM incorrectly references ``Docket No. FAA-2020-7071''
instead of ``Docket No. FAA-2022-0190.''
    Although no other part of the preamble or regulatory information
has been corrected, for clarity, the FAA is publishing the entire
proposed rule in the Federal Register.
    The comment due date of the NPRM remains March 25, 2022.

Related Service Information

    The FAA reviewed Viking DHC-2 Beaver Service Bulletin V2/0011,
Revision NC, dated November 28, 2019. This service information provides
a list of new inspection tasks that have been added to the DHC-2
supplementary inspection and corrosion control program, Viking Product
Support Manual (PSM) 1-2-5 DHC-2 Beaver Supplemental Inspection and
Corrosion Control Manual, Revision 1, dated January 10, 2019 (Viking
PSM-1-2-5, Revision 1).
    The FAA also reviewed Viking PSM-1-2-5, Revision 1, which specifies
procedures for inspecting areas of the airplane that are particularly
susceptible to corrosion-related degradation. Viking PSM 1-2-5,
Revision 1 also specifies repetitive inspection intervals, defines the
different levels of corrosion, and provides corrective action if
corrosion is found.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority,
it has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
and service information referenced above. The FAA is issuing this NPRM
after determining that the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would retain none of the requirements of AD 64-09-
03. This proposed AD would require establishing a corrosion prevention
and control program approved by the FAA, including initial inspection
tasks to identify corrosion and cracking, repetitive inspection
intervals, and corrective actions (such as repairs and application of
corrosion inhibitors) if corrosion or cracking is found. This proposed
AD would also require, before further flight after establishing the
program, completing all of the initial tasks identified in the program.
Lastly, this proposed AD would require reporting corrosion findings to
Viking. Because the program would include the inspection of the aileron
balance weight arms required by AD 64-09-03, this proposed AD would
supersede AD 64-09-03.

ADs Mandating Airworthiness Limitations

    The FAA has previously mandated airworthiness limitations by
issuing ADs that require revising the airworthiness limitation section
(ALS) of the existing maintenance manual or instructions for continued
airworthiness to incorporate new or revised inspections. This proposed
AD, however, would require establishing and incorporating new
inspections into the maintenance records required by 14 CFR
91.417(a)(2) or 135.439(a)(2) for your airplane. The FAA does not
intend this as a substantive change. Requiring incorporation of the new
ALS requirements into the maintenance records, rather than requiring
individual repetitive inspections and replacements, allows operators to
record AD compliance once after updating the maintenance records,
rather than recording compliance after every inspection and part
replacement.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI

    The MCAI requires completing the actions as specified in Viking
PSM-1-2-5. Revision 1. This proposed AD would not require Viking PSM-1-
2-5, Revision 1, but would require establishing a corrosion prevention
and control program using an FAA-approved method. However, the FAA
considers Viking PSM 1-2-5, Revision 1 an approved method.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 135 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA also estimates that it
would take about 342 work-hours per airplane to establish a corrosion
prevention and control program and comply with the initial inspection
tasks of the program.
    Based on these figures, the FAA estimates the cost of this proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $3,924,450 or $29,070 per airplane.
    The FAA estimates it would take about 1-work hour to report any
corrosion found during the proposed initial inspections, for an
estimated cost of $85 per airplane.
    The extent of damage found during the proposed initial inspections
may vary significantly from airplane to airplane. The FAA has no way to
determine the estimated cost of repair or replacement of damaged parts
for each airplane or how many airplanes may need these repairs or
replacements.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public
reporting for this collection of information is estimated to take
approximately 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Send comments regarding this burden estimate
or any other aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Information Collection
Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Correction

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Corrected]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive 64-09-03, Amendment 718 (29 FR
5390; April 22, 1964); and
0
b. Adding the following new airworthiness directive:

Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier
Inc. and de Havilland, Inc.): Docket No. FAA-2022-0190; Project
Identifier 2019-CE-048-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by March 25, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 64-09-03, Amendment 718 (29 FR 5390; April
22, 1964).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Viking Air Limited (type certificate
previously held by Bombardier Inc. and de Havilland, Inc.) Model
DHC-2 Mk. I, DHC-2 Mk. II, and DHC-2 Mk. III airplanes, all serial
numbers, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 2000, Airframe.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as corrosion-
related degradation in aging aircraft. The FAA is issuing this AD to
detect and address corrosion, which could lead to structural failure
with consequent loss of control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspection Tasks

    Within 8 months after the effective date of this AD, establish
in the maintenance records required by 14 CFR 91.417(a)(2) or
135.439(a)(2), as applicable for your aircraft, a corrosion
prevention and control program approved by the FAA that includes
initial inspections to identify corrosion and cracking, repetitive
inspection intervals, and corrective actions (repairs and
application of corrosion inhibitors) if corrosion or cracking is
found. Before further flight after establishing the corrosion
prevention and control program, complete all of the initial tasks
identified in the program. To obtain FAA approval, you must contact
the New York ACO Branch using the contact information found in
paragraph (j)(3) of this AD.
    Note 1 to paragraph (g): Viking Product Support Manual PSM 1-2-5
DHC-2 Beaver Supplemental Inspection and Corrosion Control Manual,
Revision 1, dated January 10, 2019 (Viking PSM 1-2-5, Revision 1),
contains additional information related to this AD and is an FAA-
approved method for establishing a corrosion prevention and control
program.
    Note 2 to paragraph (g): Viking DHC-2 Beaver Service Bulletin
V2/0011, Revision NC, dated November 28, 2019 (Viking SB V2/0011,
Revision NC), also contains additional information related to this
AD.

(h) Reporting

    If, during any task required by paragraph (g) of this AD, any
corrosion is found: within 30 days after completing the task or
within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, report the corrosion to Viking at
[email protected] or at the address listed in
paragraph (j)(4) of this AD. The report must include the following:
    (1) Operator;
    (2) Airplane serial number;
    (3) Airplane hours time-in-service at time of inspection;
    (4) Inspection task number and date of inspection;
    (5) Airplane operating environment; and
    (6) Type, level or extent, location, and cause (if known) of
damage.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, New York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (j)(3) of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved specifically for this AD by the Manager, New York
ACO Branch, FAA.

(j) Related Information

    (1) Refer to the MCAI from Transport Canada, AD CF-2019-25,
dated July 5, 2019, for related information. You may examine the
MCAI at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2022-0190.
    (2) Viking SB V2/0011, Revision NC and Viking PSM 1-2-5,
Revision 1 contain additional information related to this AD.
    (3) For information about this AD, contact Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].
    (4) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Viking Air Limited Technical Support, 1959 De Havilland Way, Sidney,
British Columbia, Canada, V8L 5V5; phone: (North America) (800) 663-
8444; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected];
website: https://www.vikingair.com/support/service-bulletins. You
may review this referenced service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 901
Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued on February 11, 2022.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-03459 Filed 2-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<META name="generator" content="PDFCreactiveX HTML Export">
<META name="creation-date" content="24/05/2008 06:55:19 ">
<TITLE></TITLE>


                           Kresoxim-methyl (129111)
                     Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA)
                             Date: April 30, 2012

What is a Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA)?
 Available estimates of pesticide usage data for a particular active ingredient that is used on agricultural crops in the United States.
 Pesticide usage data obtained from various sources.  The data are then merged, averaged, and rounded so that the presented information is not proprietary, business confidential, or trade secret.
What does it contain?
 Pesticide usage data for a single active ingredient only.
 Agricultural use sites (crops) that the pesticide is reported to be used on.
 Available pesticide usage information from U.S. states that produce 80% or more of a crop, in most cases, or less than 80%, in rare cases, depending on the scope of the survey and available resources.
 Annual percent of crop treated (average & maximum) for each agricultural crop.
 Average annual pounds of the pesticide applied for each agricultural crop (i.e., for the states surveyed, not for the entire United States).
What assumptions can I make about the reported data?
 Average pounds of active ingredient applied - Values are calculated by merging pesticide usage data sources together; averaging across all observations, then rounding.  Note:  If the estimated value is less than 500, then that value is labeled <500.  Estimated values between 500 & <1,000,000 are rounded to 1 significant digit.  Estimated values of 1,000,000 or greater are rounded to 2 significant digits.)
 Average percent of crop treated - Values are calculated by merging data sources together; averaging by year, averaging across all years, & rounding to the nearest multiple of 5.  Note:  If the estimated value is less than 2.5, then the value is labeled <2.5.  If the estimated value is less than 1, then the value is labeled <1.
 Maximum percent of crop treated - Value is the single maximum value reported across all data sources, across all years, & rounded up to the nearest multiple of 5.  Note:  If the estimated value is less than 2.5, then the value is labeled <2.5.
What are the data sources used?
 USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service)  -  pesticide usage data from 2003 to 2010.
 Private pesticide market research  -  pesticide usage data from 2003 to 2010.
 California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) Pesticide Use Reporting (PUR) data for 2003 to 2010.
What are the limitations to the data?
 Additional registered uses may exist but are not included because the available surveys do not report usage (e.g., small acreage crops).
 Lack of reported usage data for the pesticide on a crop does not imply zero usage.
 Usage data on a particular site may be noted in data sources, but not quantified.  In these instances, the site would not be reported in the SLUA.
 Non-agricultural use sites (e.g., turf, post-harvest, mosquito control, etc.) are not reported in the SLUA.  A separate request must be made to receive these estimates.
 Some sites show some use, even though they are not on the label.  This usage could be due to various factors, including, but not limited to Section 18 requests, existing stocks of the chemical, data collection errors, and experimental use permits (EUPs).

                                April 30, 2012
                          Reporting Years:  2003-2010
  Screening Level Estimates of Agricultural Uses of Kresoxim-methyl (129111)
                             Sorted Alphabetically

                             Percent Crop Treated
                                     Crop
                                   Lbs. A.I.
                                    Average
                                    Maximum
                                       1
Apples
                                    10,000
                                      15
                                      20
                                       2
Cantaloupes
                                    <500
                                    <2.5
                                    <2.5
                                       3
Grapes
                                    20,000
                                      10
                                      20
                                       4
Pears
                                     1,000
                                       5
                                      15
                                       5
Pecans
                                     1,000
                                    <2.5
                                       5
                                       6
Pumpkins
                                    <500
                                     <1
                                    <2.5
                                       7
Squash
                                    <500
                                     <1
                                    <2.5
                                       8
Watermelons
                                    <500
                                    <2.5
                                       5
All numbers rounded.
                                                                        <500
Less than 500 pounds of active ingredient
                                                                        <2.5
Less than 2.5 percent of crop treated
                                                                          <1
Less than 1 percent of crop treated

SLUA data sources include:
  USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service)
Private Pesticide Market Research

These results reflect amalgamated data developed by the Agency and are releasable to the public.