COMPANY FEDERAL REGISTER DOCUMENT SUBMISSION TEMPLATE  (1/1/2007)

EPA Antimicrobials Division contact: [Ms. Velma Noble,<PHONE_NUMBER>]

INSTRUCTIONS:  Please utilize this outline in preparing tolerance
petition documents.  In cases where the outline element does not apply
please insert “NA-Remove” and maintain the outline.  The comment
notes that appear on the left margin represent hidden typesetting codes
designed to expedite the processing of the Federal Register document.
Please do not remove or alter these comment notes or change the margins,
font, or format in your document. Simply replace the instructions that
appear in italics and brackets, i.e., “[insert company name],” with
the information specific to your action.]

TEMPLATE:

[Edwards-Councilor Co., Inc., 1427 Baker Road, Airport Industrial Park,
Virginia Beach, VA 23455]

[PP XXXXXX]

	EPA has received a pesticide petition ([PP 6F7071]) from
[Edwards-Councilor Co., Inc.], [1427 Baker Road, Airport Industrial
Park, Virginia Beach, VA 23455] proposing, pursuant to section 408(d) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to
amend 40 CFR part 180.

(Options (pick one)

	2. to amend an existing tolerance exemption in 40 CFR 180.940 (a) for
residues of the antimicrobial pesticide formulations containing [N-Alkyl
(C12-C18) dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride] that may be applied to food
contact surfaces in public eating places, dairy processing equipment,
and food processing equipment and utensils. When ready to use, end-use
concentration of total quaternary chemicals, [N-Alkyl (C12-C18) dimethyl
benzyl ammonium chloride] in solution is not to exceed [400] parts per
million (ppm).  EPA has determined that the petition contains data and
information regarding the elements set forth in section 408 (d)(2) of
the FDDCA; however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the
submitted data at this time or whether the data supports granting of the
petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the
petition.

A. Residue Chemistry

	1. Plant metabolism. [NA-Remove]

	2. Analytical method. [NA-Remove]

	3. Magnitude of residues. [This petition for a tolerance exemption is
for the quaternary pesticide chemical that is currently approved for use
as a food contact surface sanitizer under 21 CFR 178.1010(b)41 and
9c)36.  The economic poison product. STERAMINE 1-G TABLETS, EPA Reg. No.
1561-11, which contains the subject quaternary chemical as its active
ingredient, includes inert ingredients also approved under 21 CFR
178.1010 (b)41 and (c)36 and the GRAS list.

Public Health Regulations governing public food and beverage service
establishments require that all inanimate food contact surfaces be
properly cleaned and sanitized to protect the public health from
exposure to the hazards of disease transmitted through
cross-contamination of these surfaces that may be soiled with infectious
micro-organisms.

Under Federal Regulations, chemicals used to accomplish sanitization in
public food and beverage establishments are regulated as pesticides
under FIFRA, and are required to be registered by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency to insure that, when used as directed, they have been
proven to be effective without causing unreasonable adverse effects to
humans or the environment.  Only these pesticide chemicals whose
residues have been determined to be safe by FDA and which are listed
under 21 CFR 178.1010, are acceptable for registration with EPA as food
contact surface sanitizers.

The subject quaternary pesticide chemical and the formulated economic
poison product containing this pesticide chemical as its active
ingredients, is currently registered with EPA under RPA Reg. No. 1561-11
and is listed under 21 CFR 178.1010 9b)41 and (c)36 for use up to a
concentration level of 300 ppm.  The subject of this petition for a
tolerance exemption is to raise the upper level concentration limit for
the use of this subject pesticide chemical from 200 ppm to 400 ppm.

This petition believes that compliance with current Federal Regulations
under FIFRA and the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act for use of the subject
quaternary pesticide chemical as a food contact surface, is sufficient
evidence to ensure that:

1)	The yearly risk associated with the nonthreshold effect from
aggregate exposure to the residue is not greater than ten times the
yearly risk allowed under the new safety standard.

2)	The tolerance is limited to ensure that the lifetime risk associated
with the nonthreshold effect from aggregate exposure to the residue is
not greater than twice the lifetime risk allowed under the new safety
standard. ]

B. Toxicological Profile

	1. Acute toxicity.  [The endpoint used to perform the assessment for
acceptance of the use of this quaternary pesticide chemical under 21 CFR
178.1010 as a food contact surface sanitizer, is within the current
estimated risk level of concern of FDA and EPA.]

	2. Genotoxicty. [NA-Remove.]

	3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. [NA-Remove.]

	4. Subchronic toxicity. [NA-Remove.]

	5. Chronic toxicity. [Under 21 CFR 178.1010, the current Reference Dose
(RfD) for the subject quaternary pesticide chemical is considered
sufficient to adequately protect infants and children.  This petitioner
is not aware of any evidence as to whether or not infants and children
are more susceptible to this pesticide chemical than adults.

This subject quaternary pesticide chemical has not been determined to be
a carcinogen or to have a cancer potency factor.]

	6. Animal metabolism. [NA-Remove]

	7. Metabolite toxicology. [NA-Remove]

	8. Endocrine disruption. [PR Notice 97-1 states . . . . “as indicated
in section 408(p)(1) and (2), the agency has 2 years to develop a
screening method, with a total of 3 years to implement such a
program.”  This petitioner is not aware of any evidence relative to
the possibility that the subject pesticide chemical may have endocrine
disrupter effects individually or in combination with another chemical.]

C. Aggregate Exposure

	1. Dietary exposure. [NA-Remove]

	i. Food. [NA-Remove]

	ii. Drinking water. [Food contact surface sanitizer solutions, such as
the subject quaternary pesticide chemical solution, are primarily used
in indoor applications involving manual dishwashing in institutions and
public eating and drinking establishments. These sanitizing solutions
are prepared in sinks within these establishments, where they are used
and disposed of by discharging the sink contents down the drain into the
sanitary sewer or on site waste disposal systems.  Therefore, it is very
unlikely that this pesticide chemical or any of its degradates would
pass through primary or secondary drinking water treatment into finished
water.  This petitioner is unaware that this subject pesticide chemical
or any of its degradates has been detected in ground water or surface
water, or that any State is conducting water monitoring programs for
this pesticide.]

	2. Non-dietary exposure. [NA-Remove]

D. Cumulative Effects

	[This petitioner is unaware of any data regarding any adverse
cumulative efforts from exposure to this quaternary pesticide chemical
resulting from its use as a regulated food contact surface sanitizer.
The long history of safe use of this pesticide as a sanitizer should
strongly confirm this point.]

E. Safety Determination

	1. U.S. population. [NA-Remove]

	2. Infants and children. [NA-Remove]

F. International Tolerances

	[NA-Remove]


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30214-30216]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10599]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP22-92-000]

Venture Global Plaquemines LNG, LLC; Notice of Scoping Period
Requesting Comments on Environmental Issues for the Proposed Venture
Global Plaquemines LNG Uprate Amendment Project

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental document, that will discuss
the environmental impacts of the Venture Global Plaquemines LNG Uprate
Amendment Project (Project) involving operation of facilities by
Venture Global Plaquemines LNG, LLC (Plaquemines LNG) in Plaquemines
Parish, Louisiana. The Commission will use this environmental document
in its decision-making process to determine whether the project is in
the public interest.
    This notice announces the opening of the scoping process the
Commission will use to gather input from the public and interested
agencies regarding the project. As part of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) review process, the Commission takes into account
concerns the public may have about proposals and the environmental
impacts that could result from its action whenever it considers the
issuance of an authorization. This gathering of public input is
referred to as ``scoping.'' The main goal of the scoping process is to
focus the analysis in the environmental document on the important
environmental issues. Additional information about the Commission's
NEPA process is described below in the NEPA Process

and Environmental Document section of this notice.
    By this notice, the Commission requests public comments on the
scope of issues to address in the environmental document. To ensure
that your comments are timely and properly recorded, please submit your
comments so that the Commission receives them in Washington, DC on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on June 10, 2022. Comments may be
submitted in written form. Further details on how to submit comments
are provided in the Public Participation section of this notice.
    Your comments should focus on the potential environmental effects,
reasonable alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental
impacts. Your input will help the Commission staff determine what
issues they need to evaluate in the environmental document. Commission
staff will consider all written comments during the preparation of the
environmental document.
    If you submitted comments on this project to the Commission before
the opening of this docket on March 11, 2022, you will need to file
those comments in Docket No. CP22-92-000 to ensure they are considered
as part of this proceeding.
    This notice is being sent to the Commission's current environmental
mailing list for this project. State and local government
representatives should notify their constituents of this proposed
project and encourage them to comment on their areas of concern.
    Plaquemine LNG provided landowners with a fact sheet prepared by
the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural Gas Facility On My Land? What
Do I Need To Know?'' which addresses typically asked questions,
including the use of eminent domain and how to participate in the
Commission's proceedings. This fact sheet along with other landowner
topics of interest are available for viewing on the FERC website
(www.ferc.gov) under the Natural Gas Questions or Landowner Topics
link.

Public Participation

    There are three methods you can use to submit your comments to the
Commission. Please carefully follow these instructions so that your
comments are properly recorded. The Commission encourages electronic
filing of comments and has staff available to assist you at (866) 208-
3676 or [email protected].
    (1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature, which is located on the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov)
under the link to FERC Online. Using eComment is an easy method for
submitting brief, text-only comments on a project;
    (2) You can file your comments electronically by using the eFiling
feature, which is also located on the Commission's website
(www.ferc.gov) under the link to FERC Online. With eFiling, you can
provide comments in a variety of formats by attaching them as a file
with your submission. New eFiling users must first create an account by
clicking on ``eRegister.'' You will be asked to select the type of
filing you are making; a comment on a particular project is considered
a ``Comment on a Filing''; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the Commission. Be sure to reference the project docket number (CP22-
25-000) on your letter. Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service
must be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC
20426. Submissions sent via any other carrier must be addressed to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Additionally, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which makes it easy to stay informed of all issuances and
submittals regarding the dockets/projects to which you subscribe. These
instant email notifications are the fastest way to receive notification
and provide a link to the document files which can reduce the amount of
time you spend researching proceedings. Go to https://www.ferc.gov/ferc-online/overview to register for eSubscription.

Summary of the Proposed Project

    Plaquemines LNG proposes to increase the Export Terminal's
authorized peak liquefaction capacity achievable under optimal
conditions from 24.0 million metric tons per annum to 27.2 million
metric tons per annum of LNG--or from approximately 1,240 billion cubic
feet to approximately 1,405.33 billion cubic feet per year (gas
equivalence). According to Plaquemines LNG, this proposed increase in
the peak liquefaction capacity reflects refinements in the conditions
and assumptions concerning the maximum potential operations. The
requested increase does not involve the construction of any new
facilities nor any modification of the previously authorized
facilities.
    The general location of the Venture Global Plaquemines LNG Export
Terminal is shown in appendix 1.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The appendices referenced in this notice will not appear in
the Federal Register. Copies of the appendices were sent to all
those receiving this notice in the mail and are available at
www.ferc.gov using the link called ``eLibrary''. For instructions on
connecting to eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice. At
this time, the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's
Public Reference Room due to the proclamation declaring a National
Emergency concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19),
issued by the President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact
FERC at [email protected] or call toll free,<PHONE_NUMBER>
or TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

NEPA Process and the Environmental Document

    Any environmental document issued by the Commission will discuss
impacts that could occur as a result of the proposed project uprate
under the relevant general resource areas:
     Environmental justice;
     air quality; and
     reliability and safety.
    Commission staff will also evaluate reasonable alternatives to the
proposed project or portions of the project and make recommendations on
how to lessen or avoid impacts on the various resource areas. Your
comments will help Commission staff identify and focus on the issues
that might have an effect on the human environment and potentially
eliminate others from further study and discussion in the environmental
document.
    Commission staff will determine whether to prepare an Environmental
Assessment (EA) or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which will
present Commission staff's independent analysis of the issues. If
Commission staff prepares an EA, a Notice of Schedule for the
Preparation of an Environmental Assessment will be issued. The EA may
be issued for an allotted public comment period. The Commission would
consider timely comments on the EA before making its decision regarding
the proposed project. If Commission staff prepares an EIS, a Notice of
Intent to Prepare an EIS/Notice of Schedule will be issued, which will
open up an additional comment period. Staff will then prepare a draft
EIS which will be issued for public comment. Commission staff will
consider all timely comments received during the comment period on the
draft EIS and revise the document, as necessary, before issuing a final
EIS. Any EA or draft and final EIS will be available in electronic
format in the public record through eLibrary \2\ and the

Commission's natural gas environmental documents web page (https://www.ferc.gov/industries-data/natural-gas/environment/environmental-documents). If eSubscribed, you will receive instant email notification
when the environmental document is issued.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ For instructions on connecting to eLibrary, refer to the
last page of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With this notice, the Commission is asking agencies with
jurisdiction by law and/or special expertise with respect to the
environmental issues of this project to formally cooperate in the
preparation of the environmental document.\3\ Agencies that would like
to request cooperating agency status should follow the instructions for
filing comments provided under the Public Participation section of this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Council on Environmental Quality regulations addressing
cooperating agency responsibilities are at Title 40, Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 1501.8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultation Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act

    In accordance with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
implementing regulations for section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, the Commission is using this notice to initiate
consultation with the applicable State Historic Preservation Office(s),
and to solicit their views and those of other government agencies,
interested Indian tribes, and the public on the project's potential
effects on historic properties.\4\ The environmental document for this
project will document findings on the impacts on historic properties
and summarize the status of consultations under section 106.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations
are at Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 800. Those
regulations define historic properties as any prehistoric or
historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in
or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Environmental Mailing List

    The environmental mailing list includes federal, state, and local
government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American Tribes; other
interested parties; and local libraries and newspapers. This list also
includes all affected landowners (as defined in the Commission's
regulations) who are potential right-of-way grantors, whose property
may be used temporarily for project purposes, or who own homes within
certain distances of aboveground facilities, and anyone who submits
comments on the project and includes a mailing address with their
comments. Commission staff will update the environmental mailing list
as the analysis proceeds to ensure that Commission notices related to
this environmental review are sent to all individuals, organizations,
and government entities interested in and/or potentially affected by
the proposed project.
    If you need to make changes to your name/address, or if you would
like to remove your name from the mailing list, please complete one of
the following steps:
    (1) Send an email to [email protected] stating your
request. You must include the docket number CP22-92-000 in your
request. If you are requesting a change to your address, please be sure
to include your name and the correct address. If you are requesting to
delete your address from the mailing list, please include your name and
address as it appeared on this notice. This email address is unable to
accept comments.
    OR
    (2) Return the attached ``Mailing List Update Form'' (appendix 2).

Additional Information

    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC website at www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the docket number
in the ``Docket Number'' field. Be sure you have selected an
appropriate date range. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at [email protected] or<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of all formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
    Public sessions or site visits will be posted on the Commission's
calendar located at https://www.ferc.gov/news-events/events along with
other related information.

    Dated: May 11, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10599 Filed 5-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 29 (Friday, February 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7835-7836]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3152]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13637-001]

Great River Hydropower, LLC; Notice of Scoping Meetings and
Environmental Site Review and Soliciting Scoping Comments

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Original Major License.
    b. Project No.: P-13637-001.
    c. Date filed: July 12, 2010.
    d. Applicant: Great River Hydropower, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Upper Mississippi River Lock & Dam No. 21
Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The proposed project would be located about 100 feet
downstream of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Lock and Dam No. 21 on
the Mississippi River in Marion County, Missouri. The proposed project
would occupy 5 acres of Federal lands.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Arie DeWaal, Mead & Hunt Inc., 6501 Watts
Road, Madison, WI 53719; Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Janet Hutzel, Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by e-
mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing scoping comments: April 7, 2011.
    All documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration,
using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the
end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
interveners filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person on the official service list for the
project. Further, if an intervener files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. This application is not ready for environmental analysis at this
time.
    l. The proposed project would utilize the existing U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers' Lock and Dam No. 21, and would consist of the following
facilities: (1) A new 796-foot-long by 46-foot-wide by 25-foot-high
concrete hydropower structure consisting of 30 turbine bays, located
about 100 feet downstream of the existing dam; (2) 30 turbine-generator
units having a total installed capacity of 15 megawatts; (3) two new
48-foot-long by 15-foot-wide by 45-foot-high concrete towers; (4) a new
40-foot-long by 30-foot-wide by 20-foot-high control building; (5) a
new 120-foot-long by 120-foot-wide substation; (6) a new 1.5-mile-long
access road; (7) a new 1.6-mile-long, 69-kilovolt transmission line;
and (8) appurtenant facilities.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number (P-13637) excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support. A copy is also available for inspection
and reproduction at the address in item h above.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.
    n. Scoping Process.
    The Commission intends to prepare an Environmental assessment (EA)
on the project in accordance with the National Environmental Policy
Act. The EA will consider both site-specific and cumulative
environmental effects and reasonable alternatives to the proposed
action.

Scoping Meetings

    Commission staff will conduct one daytime scoping meeting, one
evening meeting, and an Environmental Site Review. The daytime scoping
meeting will focus on concerns of the resource agencies, non-
governmental organizations, and Indian tribes, while the evening
scoping meeting is primarily for public input. All interested
individuals, organizations, and agencies are invited to attend one or
both of the meetings and the environmental site review, and to assist
the staff in identifying the scope of the environmental issues that
should be analyzed in the EA. The times and locations of these meetings
and the Environmental Site Review are as follows:

Daytime Scoping Meeting

    Date and Time: Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 2 p.m. CST;
    Location: City Council Chamber Room, Quincy City Hall, 720 Maine
St., Quincy, IL 62301.

Evening Scoping Meeting

    Date and Time: Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 6 p.m. CST;
    Location: City Council Chamber Room, Quincy City Hall, 720 Maine
St., Quincy, IL 62301.
    Copies of the Scoping Document (SD1) outlining the subject areas to
be addressed in the EA were distributed to the parties on the
Commission's mailing

list. Copies of the SD1 will be available at the scoping meeting or may
be viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link
(see item m above).

Environmental Site Review

    Date and Time: Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 9:30 a.m. CST.
    Location: The Corp's Lock and Dam No. 21 observation tower, which
can be accessed from the south entrance to the Lock and Dam No. 21. The
address is 909 W Lock and Dam Road, Quincy, Illinois. All participants
are responsible for providing photo identification to enter the Corps'
facility, and photography and video will be prohibited.
    Phone number: All participants must contact John Neyens, Klingner &
Associates, P.C., 616 N. 24th Street, Quincy, IL 62301, phone 217-223-
3670, by February 25, 2011, to attend the Environmental Site Review.

Objectives

    At the scoping meetings, the Commission staff will: (1) Summarize
the environmental issues tentatively identified for analysis in the EA;
(2) solicit from the meeting participants all available information,
especially quantifiable data, on the resources at issue; (3) encourage
statements from experts and the public on issues that should be
analyzed in the EA, including viewpoints in opposition to, or in
support of, the staff's preliminary views; (4) determine the resource
issues to be addressed in the EA; and (5) identify those issues that
require a detailed analysis, as well as those issues that do not
require a detailed analysis.

Procedures

    The meetings are recorded by a stenographer and become part of the
formal record of the Commission proceeding on the project.
    Individuals; organizations; Indian Tribes; and Federal, State, and
local agencies with environmental expertise and concerns are encouraged
to attend the meeting and to assist Commission staff in defining and
clarifying the issues to be addressed in the EA.

    Dated: February 4, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-3152 Filed 2-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 44 (Monday, March 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10537-10538]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4765]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61619; File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2010-20]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NYSE Amex LLC To Amend Its
Price List

March 1, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 26, 2010, NYSE Amex LLC (the ``Exchange'' or ``NYSE
Amex'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its 2010 Price List to specify that
executions of Closing Offset (``CO'') orders will be free of charge.
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below,

of the most significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange has recently amended Exchange Rule 123C to, among
other things, establish a new Closing Offset (``CO'') order.\3\ The CO
order is a conditional-instruction limit order that is eligible to
participate in the closing transaction to offset an order imbalance at
the close. The CO order is not guaranteed to participate in the closing
transaction but is eligible to participate when there is an imbalance
of orders to be executed on the opposite side of the market from the CO
order and there is no other interest remaining to trade at the closing
price. The Exchange does not propose to charge transaction fees with
respect to the execution of CO orders and proposes to amend its 2010
price list to make this policy explicit. The Exchange will commence
using the CO order type on March 1, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61244 (December 28,
2009), 75 FR 479 (January 5, 2010) (SR-NYSEAmex-2009-81).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\4\ in general, and Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\5\ in particular, in that it is designed to provide
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among its members and other persons using its facilities. The
Exchange believes that the proposal does not constitute an inequitable
allocation of dues, fees and other charges, as all Exchange
participants have the ability to enter CO orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \6\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-
4 \7\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by NYSE Amex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2010-20 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2010-20. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission,\8\ all subsequent
amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m.
and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish tomake available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2010-20 and should
be submitted on or before March 29, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-4765 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18024-18029]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6630]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0436; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-230-AD;
Amendment 39-16643; AD 2011-07-06]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

* * * There have recently been several in-service occurrences that
have highlighted the inability of the existing [wing anti-ice]
system to detect a low-heat condition in the wing leading edge at
all times, with the potential consequence of unannunciated
asymmetric ice build-up on the wing. * * *

Such a condition, in combination with maneuvers close to stick
shaker activation, could possibly result in reduced controllability
of the aircraft.
* * * * *
    We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective May 6, 2011.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of May 6, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wing Chan, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on May 10, 2010 (75 FR
25788). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    At present, the Wing Anti-Ice System (WAIS) sufficient heat
switches/sensors on CL-600-2B19 aircraft are located at the inboard
end of each wing and require a simultaneous low-pressure signal to
generate a L or R WING A/ICE amber caution. However, there have
recently been several in-service occurrences that have highlighted
the inability of the existing system to detect a low-heat condition
in the wing leading edge at all times, with the potential
consequence of unannunciated asymmetric ice build-up on the wing.
These have included partial failure of several piccolo ducts [ref:
Airworthiness Directive (AD) CF-2008-30] and partial (not fully
closed or open) failure of a modulating and shut-off valve, the
latter resulting in unannunciated asymmetric ice build-up on the
wing leading edge. Such a condition, in combination with maneuvers
close to stick shaker activation, could possibly result in reduced
controllability of the aircraft.
    This directive mandates:
    (a) Revision of the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to notify the
flight crew that, following installation and activation of the low-
heat detection switches, certain WAIS mode selection changes may
result in a two-minute inhibition of the wing anti-ice message, if
posted;
    (b) Revision of the approved maintenance schedule to include one
revised and three new functional checks that are required following
activation of the low-heat detection switches;
    (c) Replacement of the Data Concentrator Units (DCUs) with DCUs
incorporating a software update that caters for the new outboard
low-heat detection switches and generates the appropriate anti-ice
message for the flight crew when a low-heat condition is detected;

    Note:  Although not related to this directive, the software
update also corrects the sampling rate of two previously non-
compliant Flight Data Recorder (FDR) parameters, normal acceleration
and pitch attitude.

    (d) Installation of the low-heat detection switches in the wing
outboard leading edges, the wing A/ICE box assembly and associated
wires; and
    (e) Activation of the low-heat detection switches.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.

Support for the NPRM

    Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) stated that it
agrees that all reasonable steps should be taken to avoid reduced
controllability while operating in icing conditions. ALPA stated that
it supports the NPRM, but also encouraged the FAA to implement it as
soon as possible to enable full compliance before winter.

Requests To Revise Costs of Compliance

    Limited Brands and Air Wisconsin requested that we revise the costs
of compliance. Limited Brands disagreed with the estimate of 21 work-
hours and the cost of $1,785 per product to comply with the proposed
AD. Limited Brands stated that the modification of the data
concentrator unit (DCU), as required by paragraph (g)(3) of the NPRM,
costs $1,200, the installation required by paragraph (g)(4) of the NPRM
costs $3,300, and additional labor costs are $25,000, which brings the
actual cost to $30,000 per airplane. Air Wisconsin stated it calculated
that the costs are $600 for each of the two upgrades, $2,570 for other
required parts, and 70 work-hours--for a total of $9,720 per airplane.
    We agree to revise the Costs of Compliance section of this AD. We
have based our cost estimate on the service information and information
from the manufacturer, and have calculated the costs for complying with
the AD as follows: 2 work-hours for revising the Limitations section of
the AFM and the ALI; 3 work-hours for replacing the DCU; 72 work-hours
for installing the switches, assemblies, and wires; and 4 work-hours
for activating the switches. We also calculated $4,500 for parts. We
revised the Costs of Compliance section of this AD accordingly.

Request To Clarify the Modification to the Wing Leading Edges

    Air Wisconsin requested clarification regarding the modification of
the wing leading edges. Air Wisconsin noted that the effectivity is
against the airplane models but Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-30-
031, Revision D, dated February 3, 2010, specifies modifying the
leading edges, which was not addressed in the NPRM. Air Wisconsin noted
that, if a non-modified spare leading edge is installed, there could be
cause for confusion.
    We agree to provide clarification. The actions required by
paragraph (g)(4) of this AD include modifying the leading edges.

Request To Revise the Compliance Time for Requirements of Paragraph
(g)(2) of the NPRM for Task C30-10-141-01

    Mesa Airlines requested that we clarify the requirements of
paragraph (g)(2) of the NPRM for Task C30-10-141-01. Mesa Airlines
stated that on page 2A-11 of Appendix A of Part 2 of the Bombardier CL-
600-2B19 Maintenance Requirement Manual (MRM), Task C30-10-141-10
provides the functional check of the wing anti-ice standby overheat
switches and overheat/sufficient heat sensors and associated circuitry
with an interval of 6,000 flight hours. Mesa Airlines stated that page
1-2-35 of Section 2 of Part 1 of the Bombardier CL-600-2B19 Maintenance
Review Board (MRB) Report, Task 30-12-12-01, ``Functional check of the
wing anti-ice overheat sensors (duplicate Certification Maintenance
Requirements (CMR) C30-10-141-01),'' provides a compliance time of
4,000 flight hours. Mesa Airlines also stated that page 1-1-6 of
Section 1 of Part 1 of the Bombardier CL-600-2B19 MRM states the
following in Note 15: ``This task has a duplicate CMR requirement.
Refer to Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP-A-053, Part 2, Appendix
A, for identification of specific requirements regarding handling of
CMRs. Where the CMR interval for an MRB report task is more
restrictive, the CMR interval takes precedence. When the interval for
an MRB report task is more restrictive, the

MRB report task interval will take precedence.''
    Mesa Airlines asked that we clarify the NPRM as to which interval
needs to be tracked--6,000 flight hours or 4,000 flight hours.
    We agree to clarify. The intent of the AD is to introduce the CMR
tasks that are associated with the new switches. CMR Task C30-10-141-01
was inadvertently mandated in Canadian AD CF-2009-37 and was carried
over into the NPRM. The MRB group is currently looking into harmonizing
these task intervals. Therefore, we have removed CMR Task C30-10-141-01
from Table 1 of this final rule.

Request To Clarify Required Service Information

    Air Wisconsin requested that we clarify the name of the service
information in paragraph (g)(2) of the NPRM. Air Wisconsin stated that
paragraph (g)(2) of the NPRM refers to ``Airworthiness Limitations
Instructions.'' Air Wisconsin asked if it should instead be
``Bombardier CL-600-2B19 Maintenance Requirements Manual (MRM),
Appendix A, Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMR).''
    We agree with the commenter's suggested service information
citation. We have changed paragraph (g)(2) of this final rule
accordingly.

Request To Revise Compliance Time in Table 1 of the NPRM

    Air Wisconsin requested that we revise the compliance time in Table
1 of the NPRM. Air Wisconsin stated that under the column heading
``Initial Compliance Time (whichever occurs later)'' for Tasks C30-10-
141-03, C30-10-141-05, and C30-10-141-07 in Table 1, the compliance
time under that column heading should read ``Before the accumulation of
6,000 flight hours, or if previously accomplished, within 6,000 flight
hours since last accomplishment, whichever comes first.'' The commenter
did not provide a reason for these suggestions.
    We agree with the commenter's suggested change. The intent of Table
1 is to establish the initial compliance times for accomplishment of
the specified tasks because only repetitive intervals are specified in
Bombardier TR 2A-46, dated July 24, 2009. However, we acknowledge that
some operators might have previously accomplished the initial tasks and
could be doing those tasks repetitively. The commenter's suggested
language would provide credit for earlier accomplishment of the tasks
for those operators. We have revised Table 1 to include the language
suggested by the commenter.

Request To Remove Note 3 of the NPRM

    Air Wisconsin requested to remove Note 3 from the NPRM. Air
Wisconsin stated that the inspection requirements in Bombardier
Temporary Revision (TR) 2A-46, dated July 24, 2009, are already
contained in the general revision of the MRM, specifically, Revision 9,
dated December 10, 2009. Air Wisconsin stated that this updated general
revision makes Note 3 irrelevant and, therefore, the note should be
removed.
    We disagree. The note is necessary to keep operators in compliance
when the TR is incorporated into general revisions. Operators that have
a revision of the MRM that contains the information in Bombardier TR
2A-46 are in compliance. We have not changed the final rule in regard
to this issue.

Request To Remove Note 4 of the NPRM

    Air Wisconsin requested we remove Note 4 from the NPRM. Air
Wisconsin stated this note is not pertinent to the content of the NPRM
because Task 30-11-41-820-801 is not part of Bombardier Service
Bulletin 601R-30-031, Revision D, dated February 3, 2010, and should be
removed.
    We disagree. Task 30-11-41-820-801 is pertinent to this AD because
it is part of the Bombardier CRJ Series Regional Jet Aircraft
Maintenance Manual, and it provides guidance to correct alignment of
the piccolo ducts since a small number of cases have been reported in
which they were found to have been installed in the opposing wing,
resulting in the incorrect orientation of the bleed holes. One of the
requirements of this AD is to install the low-heat direction switches
in the wing outboard leading edges. This task requires particular
attention to the correct alignment of the piccolo ducts after the
installation of the low-heat detection switches. We have not changed
the final rule in regard to this issue.

Request To Revise Compliance Time for Requirements of Paragraph (g)(5)
of the NPRM

    Air Wisconsin, Mesaba Airlines, and Mesa Airlines requested that we
revise the compliance time for activating the outboard low-heat
detection switches, as proposed by paragraph (g)(5) of the NPRM. Air
Wisconsin requested that incorporating the procedures specified in Part
F of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
601R-30-031, Revision D, dated February 3, 2010, should be performed at
the next heavy maintenance visit, provided that parts (kits) are
available. Air Wisconsin stated that it has scheduled these tasks to be
completed by the end of December 2011. Mesaba Airlines requested that
the compliance time in paragraph (g) of the NPRM be revised from 11
months to 5,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD.
Mesaba Airlines stated that the 11-month compliance time for the
modification will result in extended downtime and cause interruptions.
Mesa Airlines stated that it agrees with Mesaba Airlines' request to
change the compliance time from months to hours.
    We disagree. In developing the compliance time for this AD action,
we considered not only the safety implications of the identified unsafe
condition, but the average utilization rate of the affected fleet, the
practical aspects of an orderly modification of the fleet during
regular maintenance periods, the availability of required parts, and
the time necessary for the rulemaking process. The proposed compliance
time, which is based on the effective date of the final rule, was
determined to be appropriate. However, under the provisions of
paragraph (h) of the final rule, we will consider requests for approval
of an extension of the compliance time if sufficient data are submitted
to substantiate that the change would provide an acceptable level of
safety. We have not changed the final rule in regard to this issue.

Clarification of Changes to This AD

    We have revised paragraph (e) of this AD by removing some text and
retaining only the text that applies to the Reason section of this AD.
    In addition, we have removed paragraph (h)(3) of the NPRM because
this AD does not contain a reporting requirement.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information

provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 599 products of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it takes about 81 work-hours per product to comply
with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is $85
per work-hour. Parts cost $4,500 per product. Based on these figures,
we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to be $6,819,615,
or $11,385 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2011-07-06 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16643. Docket No. FAA-
2010-0436; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-230-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective May 6,
2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes, certificated in any
category, serial numbers 7003 through 8101 inclusive.

    Note 1:  This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance according
to paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the airplane.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 30 and 31:
Ice and rain protection, and instruments, respectively.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

* * * There have recently been several in-service occurrences that
have highlighted the inability of the existing [wing anti-ice]
system to detect a low-heat condition in the wing leading edge at
all times, with the potential consequence of unannunciated
asymmetric ice build-up on the wing. * * * Such a condition, in
combination with maneuvers close to stick shaker activation, could
possibly result in reduced controllability of the aircraft.
* * * * *

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Actions

    (g) Do the following actions.
    (1) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, revise
the Limitations and Normal Procedures sections of the Canadair
Regional Jet Airplane Flight Manual (AFM), CSP A-012, to include the
information in Canadair (Bombardier) Temporary Revision (TR) RJ/164-
2, dated May 14, 2009. This TR introduces procedures for operation
in icing conditions. Operate the airplane according to the
limitations and procedures in this TR.

    Note 2: This may be done by inserting a copy of Canadair
(Bombardier) TR RJ/164-2, dated May 14, 2009, into the AFM. When
this TR has been included in general revisions of the AFM, the
general revisions may be inserted in the AFM, provided the relevant
information in the general revision is identical to that in Canadair
(Bombardier) TR RJ/164-2, dated May 14, 2009.

    (2) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, revise
the maintenance program by incorporating the inspection requirements
for Tasks C30-10-141-03, C30-10-141-05, and C30-10-141-07, contained
in Bombardier TR 2A-46, dated July 24, 2009, into Appendix A,
``Certification Maintenance Requirements,'' of Part 2 of the
Bombardier CL-600-2B19 Maintenance Requirements Manual (MRM). The
initial compliance times for the tasks identified in Bombardier TR
2A-46, dated July 24, 2009, are specified in Table 1 of this AD.

    Note 3:  The actions required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD may
be done by inserting a copy of Bombardier TR 2A-46, dated July 24,
2009, into the Bombardier CL-600-2B19 MRM. When this TR has been
included in general revisions of the MRM, the general revisions may
be inserted into the MRM, provided the relevant information in the
general revision is identical to that in Bombardier TR 2A-46, dated
July 24, 2009.

                       Table 1--Initial Compliance Times for Tasks in Bombardier TR 2A-46
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Task                      Applicability          Initial compliance time (whichever occurs later)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C30-10-141-03.................  Airplanes on which          Before the accumulation    Within 5 flight hours or
                                 Modification Summary        of 6,000 total flight      30 days after the
                                 TC601R17494 or actions      hours; or if               effective date of this
                                 specified in Bombardier     accomplished previously,   AD, whichever occurs
                                 Service Bulletin 601R-30-   within 6,000 flight        later.
                                 031 have been done.         hours since this task
                                                             was last accomplished.
C30-10-141-05.................  Airplanes with outboard     Before the accumulation    Within 5 flight hours or
                                 sufficient heat switches    of 6,000 total flight      30 days after the
                                 installed in accordance     hours; or if               effective date of this
                                 with Modification Summary   accomplished previously,   AD, whichever occurs
                                 TC601R17494 or actions      within 6,000 flight        later.
                                 specified in Bombardier     hours since this task
                                 Service Bulletin 601R-30-   was last accomplished.
                                 031 have been done.
C30-10-141-07.................  Airplanes with outboard     Before the accumulation    Within 5 flight hours or
                                 sufficient heat switches    of 6,000 total flight      30 days after the
                                 installed in accordance     hours; or if               effective date of this
                                 with Modification Summary   accomplished previously,   AD, whichever occurs
                                 TC601R17494 or actions      within 6,000 flight        later.
                                 specified in Bombardier     hours since this task
                                 Service Bulletin 601R-30-   was last accomplished.
                                 031 have been done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (3) For airplanes having S/Ns 7003 through 8095 inclusive:
Before or concurrently with accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (g)(5) of this AD: Replace any data concentrator units
(DCUs) having part number (P/N) 622-9820-007, 622-9820-008, or 622-
9820-009 with modified DCUs having P/N 622-9820-010, and, if
applicable, modify the configuration strapping units (CSUs), in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 601R-31-034, Revision A, dated April 10, 2008.
    (4) Before or concurrently with accomplishing the actions
required by paragraph (g)(5) of this AD: Install the outboard low-
heat detection switches, and wing A/ICE box assembly and its
associated wires, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Parts A, C, D, and E of Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-30-031,
Revision D, dated February 3, 2010.

    Note 4:  A small number of cases have been reported in which
piccolo ducts were found to have been installed in the opposite
wing, resulting in the incorrect orientation of the bleed holes.
During reinstallation of the piccolo ducts and leading edge
assemblies after installing the low-heat detection switches,
particular attention should be paid to the correct alignment of the
piccolo ducts. Guidance can be found in Task 30-11-41-820-801 of the
Canadair CRJ Series Regional Jet Aircraft Maintenance Manual.

    (5) Within 11 months after the effective date of this AD:
Activate the outboard low-heat detection switches in accordance with
Part F of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service
Bulletin 601R-30-031, Revision D, dated February 3, 2010.
    (6) Actions accomplished in accordance with the service
information specified in Table 2 of this AD, before the effective
date of this AD, are acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding actions required by paragraphs (g)(4) and (g)(5) of
this AD.

                                     Table 2--Acceptable Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Bombardier Service Bulletin--                Revision--                           Dated--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
601R-30-031.............................  Original...................  May 15, 2009.
601R-30-031.............................  A..........................  September 8, 2009.
601R-30-031.............................  B..........................  October 28, 2009.
601R-30-031.............................  C..........................  December 23, 2009.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (7) Replacing DCUs P/N 622-9820-007, 622-9820-008, or 622-9820-
009 with modified DCUs having P/N 622-9820-010, and modifying CSUs,
are also acceptable for compliance with the requirements of
paragraph (g)(3) of this AD if done before the effective date of
this AD, in accordance with Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-30-034, dated November 19, 2007.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 5:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: The MCAI specifies to include the revised
Task C30-10-141-01. This AD does not include Task 30-10-141-01. This
difference has been coordinated with TCCA.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 516-794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

Related Information

    (i) Refer to MCAI Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA)
Airworthiness Directive CF-2009-37, dated September 30, 2009; and
the service information specified in Table 3 of this AD; for related
information.

                                          Table 3--Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Service information                           Revision                        Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-30-031............  D........................  February 3, 2010.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-31-034............  A........................  April 10, 2008.
Bombardier Temporary Revision 2A-46 to Appendix A--  Original.................  July 24, 2009.
 Certification Maintenance Requirements of Part 2
 of the Bombardier CL[dash]600-2B19 Maintenance
 Requirements Manual.
Canadair (Bombardier) Temporary Revision RJ/164-2    Original.................  May 14, 2009.
 to the Canadair Regional Jet Airplane Flight
 Manual CSP A-012.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (j) You must use the service information contained in Table 4 of
this AD, as applicable, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

                                   Table 4--Material Incorporated by Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Service information                           Revision                        Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-30-031............  D........................  February 3, 2010.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-31-034............  A........................  April 10, 2008.
Bombardier Temporary Revision 2A-46 to Appendix A--  Original.................  July 24, 2009.
 Certification Maintenance Requirements of Part 2
 of the Bombardier CL-600-2B19 Maintenance
 Requirements Manual.
Canadair (Bombardier) Temporary Revision RJ/164-2    Original.................  May 14, 2009.
 to the Canadair Regional Jet Airplane Flight
 Manual CSP A-012.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 14, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-6630 Filed 3-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 140 (Friday, July 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42717-42718]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17650]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Commission Staff Attendance

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives
notice that members of the Commission's staff may attend the following
meeting related to the transmission planning activities of the PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM):

Transmission Owner Cost Allocation Proposal Meeting

July 18, 2012, 10:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m., Local Time

    The above-referenced meeting will be held at: The Washington
Marriott at Metro Center, Washington, DC.
    The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at www.pjm.com.
    The discussions at the meeting described above may address matters
at issue in the following proceedings:

Docket No. EL05-121, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket Nos. ER06-456, ER06-954, ER06-1271, ER07-424, ER06-880, EL07-57,
ER07-1186, ER08-229, ER08-1065, ER09-497, and ER10-268, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER10-253 and EL10-14, Primary Power, L.L.C.
Docket No. EL10-52, Central Transmission, LLC v. PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
Docket No. ER11-4070, RITELine Indiana et. al.
Docket No. ER11-2875 and EL11-20, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER09-1256, Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER09-1589, FirstEnergy Service Company
Docket No. ER10-549, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. EL11-56, FirstEnergy Service Company
Docket No. EL12-38, New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-1844, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER11-2140, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

Docket No. ER11-2622, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER11-3106, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER11-4379, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER12-445, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER12-773, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER12-718, New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1177, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER12-1178, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER12-1693, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. EL12-69, Primary Power LLC v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER12-1700, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER12-1810, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER12-1901, GenOn Power Midwest, LP
Docket No. ER12-2080, GenOn Power Midwest, LP
Docket No. ER12-2085, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

    For more information, contact Jonathan Fernandez, Office of Energy
Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (202) 502-
6604 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: July 12, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-17650 Filed 7-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 213 (Wednesday, November 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 68317]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28091]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM15-14-000]

Revised Critical Infrastructure Protection; Reliability
Standards; Notice of Techinical Conference

    Take notice that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission) will hold a Commission staff-led technical conference on
Critical Infrastructure Protection Supply Chain Risk Management issues
identified in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) in the above-
captioned docket on January 28, 2016. The conference will begin at 9:00
a.m. and end at approximately 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time). The conference
will be held at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The technical conference shall facilitate a structured dialogue on
supply chain risk management issues identified by the Commission in the
Revised Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) Standards NOPR.
Technical Conference panelists may be asked to address: (1) The NOPR
proposal to direct that NERC develop a Reliability Standard to address
supply chain risk management; (2) the anticipated features of, and
requirements that should be included in, such a standard; and (3) a
reasonable timeframe for development of a standard. The technical
conference will be led by Commission staff, with prepared remarks to be
presented by invited panelists, which must be submitted to the
Commission in advance of the conference. A subsequent notice providing
an agenda and details on the topics for discussion will be issued in
advance of the conference. Commissioners may attend and participate.
    There is no fee for attendance. However, members of the public are
encouraged to preregister online at: https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/registration/01-28-16-form.asp.
    Those wishing to participate in panel discussions should submit
nominations no later than close of business on November 20, 2015 online
at: https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/registration/01-28-16-speaker-form.asp.
    There will be no webcast of this event. However, it will be
transcribed. Transcripts of the conference will be immediately
available for a fee from Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.<PHONE_NUMBER>).
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please
send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll free (866) 208-
3372 (voice) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a fax to<PHONE_NUMBER>
with the requested accommodations.
    For more information about the technical conference, please
contact: Sarah McKinley, Office of External Affairs,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: October 28, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-28091 Filed 11-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36978-36979]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13466]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Rule 477, OMB Control No. 3235-0550, SEC File No. 270-493.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission

plans to submit this existing collection of information to the Office
of Management and Budget for extension and approval.
    Rule 477 (17 CFR 230.477) under the Securities Act of 1933 (15
U.S.C. 77a et seq.) sets forth procedures for withdrawing a
registration statement, including any amendments or exhibits to the
registration statement. The rule provides that if an issuer intends to
rely on the safe harbor contained in Securities Act Rule 155 to conduct
an unregistered private offering of securities, the issuer must
affirmatively state in the withdrawal application that it plans to
undertake a subsequent private offering of its securities. Without this
statement, the Commission would not be able to monitor a company's
reliance on, and compliance with, Securities Act Rule 155(c). We
estimate that approximately 327 issuers will file Securities Act Rule
477 submissions annually at an estimated one hour per response for a
total annual burden of approximately 327 hours.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Please direct your written comments to Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: June 2, 2016.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-13466 Filed 6-7-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P