[Federal Register: October 8, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 194)]
[Notices]
[Page 51921-51926]
[DOCID:fr08oc09-103]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60782; File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2009-69]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NYSE Amex LLC Amending NYSE
Amex Equities Rule 128 Governing Clearly Erroneous Executions for NYSE
Amex Equities

October 2, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 2, 2009, NYSE Amex LLC (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE Amex'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. NYSE Amex has designated the
proposed rule change as constituting a rule change under Rule

19b-4(f)(6) under the Act,\3\ which renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Amex Equities Rule 128 (Clearly
Erroneous Executions for NYSE Amex Equities) governing clearly
erroneous executions for NYSE Amex equities. The text of the proposed
rule change is available at the Exchange, the Commission's Public
Reference Room, and http://www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 128 in order to improve the
Exchange's policies and procedures regarding clearly erroneous
executions that occur on the NYSE Amex equities and on other national
market centers. The proposed changes are part of a market-wide effort
designed to provide transparency and finality with respect to clearly
erroneous executions. This effort seeks to achieve consistent results
for participants across U.S. equities exchanges while maintaining a
fair and orderly market, protecting investors and protecting the public
interest. The proposed changes are more fully discussed below.
Definition
    The Exchange will maintain the meaning of the definition of a
clearly erroneous execution, but proposes to add clarifying language
with respect to cancelled trades. The proposed change identifies that
when a clearly erroneous execution occurs and both parties agree to
cancel the execution and when a trade is determined by the Exchange to
be clearly erroneous such executions will be removed ``from the
Consolidated Tape.'' \4\ A trade will be removed from the Consolidated
Tape only when the determination is deemed final and any applicable
appeals have been exhausted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ For purposes of this Rule, ``removed from the Consolidate
Tape'' means that a subsequent message will be sent to the
Consolidated Tape indicating that a previously executed trade has
been cancelled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Member or Member Organization Initiated Review Requests
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 128 to update the procedures
for requesting a review of a clearly erroneous execution. First, and
throughout Rule 128, the term ``Officer'' will be defined as an Officer
of the Exchange or such other senior level employee designee. Next, the
proposed rule will require that requests for review be made by
electronic mail (``e-mail'') or other electronic means specified from
time to time by the Exchange, except for market participants who trade
on the Floor of the Exchange, who will continue to be permitted to make
such requests for review in person on the Floor of the Exchange.
Requiring requests for review to be made electronically, except those
requests made in person on the Floor of the Exchange, creates a
standard format that can easily be logged and tracked. The Exchange
will continue to publish the e-mail address and other electronic means
to be used for all clearly erroneous filings in a circular distributed
to members and member organizations.
    The Exchange further proposes that requests for review must be
received by the Exchange within thirty (30) minutes of the execution
time for orders initially routed to and executed on the Exchange. The
Exchange proposes that members and member organizations submit certain
essential identifying information with the request including the time
of the execution(s), security symbol(s), number of shares, price(s),
side (bought or sold), and factual basis for believing that the trade
is clearly erroneous. The current rule requires requests for review to
be received within fifteen (15) minutes of the execution and does not
specify what information is required. The Exchange believes that thirty
(30) minutes is an appropriate time frame that offers the requesting
party sufficient time to gather and submit all required information.
    The proposed rule also requires the Exchange to notify the
counterparty to a trade upon receipt of a timely filed request for
review that satisfies the Numerical Guidelines set forth within the
rule. This proposed language eliminates the requirement that
counterparties be notified of every request for a ruling and instead
requires notice only when a request is filed in a timely manner and
satisfies the Numerical Guidelines. This change alleviates the burden
on the Exchange of notifying the counterparty when a request for review
does not merit a ruling.
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 128 to allow an Officer to
request additional information from each party to an execution under
review. Parties to an execution under review will have thirty (30)
minutes from the time of the request to provide additional supporting
information.
Routed Executions
    The Exchange proposes to give other market centers an additional
thirty (30) minutes from the receipt of their participant's timely
filing to request a ruling, but no longer than sixty (60) minutes from
the time of the execution under review. This provision accounts for
those executions initially directed to an away market center and
subsequently routed by that away market center to the Exchange.
    For example, assume an order is initially routed by a participant
to Market Center A and subsequently routed to the NYSE Amex where the
order is executed at a price outside of the Numerical Guidelines. This
provision generally requires Market Center A to file with the Exchange
within thirty (30) minutes from the time it receives its participant's
timely filed request for review. This provision caps the filing
deadline for an away market center at sixty (60) minutes from the time
of the execution under review.
Threshold Factors
    Currently, the Exchange's Clearly Erroneous Execution rule does not
identify specific numeric guidelines for determining what constitutes a
clearly erroneous execution. The current rule simply provides that ``an
Officer of the Exchange * * * shall review the transaction * * * and
determine whether it is clearly erroneous, with a view toward
maintaining a fair and orderly market and the protection of investors
and the public interest.'' \5\ In practice, the Exchange currently
incorporates the internal guidelines in the Exchange's Clearly
Erroneous Execution policy. The Exchange proposes adding certain
numerical

thresholds to the Rule that explicitly state what constitutes, among
other factors, a possible clearly erroneous execution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ NYSE Amex Equities Rule 128(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Numerical Guidelines
    The proposed Numerical Guidelines state that an execution executed
during the regular trading hours and after hours of the Exchange may be
found to be clearly erroneous only if the price of the execution to buy
is greater, or less in the case of a sale, than the Reference Price by
an amount that equals or exceeds the numerical guidelines for a
particular execution category. The execution time of the transaction
under review determines whether the Numerical Guideline applied is for
the regular trading hours or the after hours of the Exchange. The
Reference Price shall be equal to the Consolidated Last Sale
immediately prior to the execution under review, unless unusual
circumstances are present. The proposed guidelines for sales greater
than $0.00 up to and including $25.00 are 10% for the regular trading
hours and 20% for the after hours of the Exchange. The proposed
guidelines for sales greater than $25.00 up to and including $50.00 are
5% for the regular trading hours and 10% for the after hours of the
Exchange. The proposed guidelines for sales greater than $50.00 are 3%
for the regular trading hours and 6% for the after hours of the
Exchange. A filing involving five or more securities by the same member
or member organization will be aggregated into a single filing called a
``Multi-Stock Event.'' In the case of a Multi-Stock Event, the proposed
guidelines are 10% per security for the regular trading hours and after
hours of the Exchange. In the case of Leveraged ETF/ETN securities, the
above guidelines are to be multiplied by the leverage multiplier of the
security. Executions that do not meet or exceed the Numerical
Guidelines will not be eligible for review under this section. The
following chart summarizes the proposed Numerical Guidelines.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Regular  trading
                                     hours of the     After hours of the
                                  exchange numerical  exchange numerical
                                      guidelines           guidelines
  Reference price: Consolidated        (subject            (subject
            last sale                execution's %       execution's %
                                    difference from     difference from
                                   the consolidated    the consolidated
                                      last sale)          last sale)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greater than $0.00 up to and      10%...............  20%.
 including $25.00.
Greater than $25.00 up to and     5%................  10%.
 including $50.00.
Greater than $50.00.............  3%................  6%.
Multi-Stock Event--Filings        10%...............  10%.
 involving five or more
 securities by the same member
 or member organization will be
 aggregated into a single filing.
Leveraged ETF/ETN securities....  Regular Trading     After Hours of the
                                   Hours of the        Exchange
                                   Exchange            Numerical
                                   Numerical           Guidelines
                                   Guidelines          multiplied by the
                                   multiplied by the   leverage
                                   leverage            multiplier (i.e.
                                   multiplier (i.e.    2x).
                                   2x).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Establishing Numerical Guidelines within the Rule brings regulatory
transparency and consistency in the application of the rules of the
Exchange. These Numerical Guidelines represent the general consensus
approach and were developed based on the collective experiences of a
market-wide group. The Exchange believes that the thresholds
established are fair and appropriate and apply evenly to all
participants.
Unusual Circumstances
    The Exchange further proposes that in Unusual Circumstances the
Exchange may, in its discretion and with a view toward maintaining a
fair and orderly market and the protection of investors and the public
interest, use a Reference Price other than the consolidated last sale.
Unusual Circumstances may include periods of extreme market volatility,
sustained illiquidity, or widespread system issues. Other Reference
Prices that the Exchange may use would include the consolidated inside
price, the consolidated opening price, the consolidated prior close, or
the consolidated last sale prior to a series of executions.
    The following example explains the use of a Reference Price equal
to the consolidated last sale prior to a series of executions.
    ABC has a consolidated last sale of $10.00. During the regular
trading hours of the Exchange Customer A enters a market order to buy
10,000 shares, although it had intended a market order for 1,000
shares. The size of the order is such that the order sweeps the NYSE
Amex Display Book, which reflects 1,000 shares of liquidity offered at
each of following prices. Executions occur, moving through the depth of
Book, as follows:

Trade 1-1,000 shares @ $10.00 (9,000 remaining)
Trade 2-1,000 shares @ $10.20 (8,000 remaining)
Trade 3-1,000 shares @ $10.40 (7,000 remaining)
Trade 4-1,000 shares @ $10.60 (6,000 remaining)
Trade 5-1,000 shares @ $10.80 (5,000 remaining)
Trade 6-1,000 shares @ $11.00 (4,000 remaining)
Trade 7-1,000 shares @ $11.20 (3,000 remaining)
Trade 8-1,000 shares @ $11.40 (2,000 remaining)
Trade 9-1,000 shares @ $11.60 (1,000 remaining)
Trade 10-1,000 shares @ $11.80 (complete)

    Thus, to be eligible for review, an execution must be at a price
that is at least 10% higher than the consolidated last sale prior to
the series of executions. Customer A could request a ruling for trades
6 through 10, priced at $11.00 and above, but trades
1 through 5 would not be eligible for review.
    Under the proposed rule the Exchange may also use a higher
Numerical Guideline if, after market participants have been alerted to
erroneous activity, the price of the security returns toward its prior
trading range but continues to trade at a price beyond the Numerical
Guidelines.
Joint Market Rulings
    In the interest of achieving consistency across markets, the
Exchange proposes that, in events that involve other markets, the
Exchange would have the ability to use a different Reference Price and/
or Numerical Guideline. In these instances the Reference Price would be
determined based on a consensus among the Exchanges where the
executions occurred. Furthermore, when a ruling is made across markets,
the Exchange may determine that the ruling is not eligible

for appeal because immediate finality is necessary to maintain a fair
and orderly market and to protect investors and the public interest.
While the Exchange will coordinate its review of a clearly erroneous
execution with other affected market centers with the goal of rendering
consistent results across the market, the Exchange is not bound by
joint market rulings when such rulings would violate other NYSE Amex
equities rules or are inconsistent with internal policies of the
Exchange.
Additional Factors
    The proposed amendments to Rule 128 also enumerate some additional
factors that an Officer may consider when determining whether an
execution is clearly erroneous. These factors include, but are not
limited to, system malfunctions or disruptions, volume and volatility
for the security, derivative securities products that correspond to
greater than 100% in the direction of a tracking index, news released
for the security, whether trading in the security was recently halted/
resumed, whether the security is an IPO, whether the security was
subject to a stock-split, reorganization, or other corporate action,
overall market conditions, Opening and Late Session executions,
validity of the consolidated tape's trades and quotes, consideration of
primary market indications, Liquidity Replenishment Points (``LRPs''),
Depth Guidelines and executions inconsistent with the trading pattern
in the stock. Each additional factor shall be considered with a view
toward maintaining a fair and orderly market, the protection of
investors and the public interest.
Numerical Guidelines Applicable to Volatile Market Opens
    The Exchange proposes to give the Exchange the ability to expand
the Numerical Guidelines applicable to executions occurring between
9:30 a.m. and 10 a.m. based on the disseminated value of the S&P 500
Futures at 9:15 a.m. When the S&P Futures are up or down 3% up to but
not including 5% at 9:15 a.m., the Numerical Guidelines are doubled.
When the S&P Futures are up or down 5% or greater at 9:15 a.m., the
Numerical Guidelines are tripled. The Exchange believes that the S&P
500 futures contract is an appropriate and reliable barometer of market
activity prior to the market opening due to its broad based market
coverage and deep liquidity. Using the S&P 500 Futures disseminated
value at 9:15 a.m. as the barometer of market activity, the Exchange is
providing a transparent means of offering adjusted guidelines in times
of volatile market activity.
Outlier Executions
    The proposed amendments to Rule 128 provide that the Officer may
consider requests for review received after thirty (30) minutes, but
not longer than sixty (60) minutes after the execution in question in
the case of an Outlier Execution. An Outlier Execution is an execution
where, (1) the execution price of the security is greater than three
times the current Numerical Guidelines, or (2) the execution price of
the security breaches the 52-week high or low, in which case the
Exchange may consider Additional Factors to determine if the execution
qualifies for review or if the Exchange shall decline to act.
Review Procedures
Initial Determination
    Under the current rule, if the Officer determines that the
execution is not clearly erroneous, the Officer shall not take any
action in connection with the completed execution. In the event that
the Officer determines that the execution in dispute is clearly
erroneous, the Officer shall either declare the execution null and void
or modify one or more of the terms of the transaction to achieve an
equitable rectification of the error that would place the parties in
the same position, or as close as possible to the same position that
they would have been in, had the error not occurred. In the proposed
rule, in the event the Officer determines there is a clearly erroneous
execution, the Officer may declare the execution null and void or, if
such transaction occurred only on the Exchange and no contemporaneous
transaction(s) occurred on another market center(s) at a price that
meets or exceeds the applicable Numerical Guidelines and if the
Exchange has no actual knowledge of a clearly erroneous execution
review of a contemporaneous transaction of the subject security on
another market center, modify one or more of the terms of the
transaction to achieve an equitable rectification of the error that
would place the parties in the same position, or as close as possible
to the same position that they would have been in, had the error not
occurred.
    For purposes of the proposed Rule, a transaction will be considered
to have been contemporaneous if it was reported to the Consolidated
Tape within a reasonable time frame of the transaction under review.
Such time frame shall be determined by the Officer at the time of the
clearly erroneous determination based on the liquidity of the relevant
security, but shall in no case be less than one (1) second before or
after the time of execution on the Exchange. In assessing whether there
was a contemporaneous transaction on another market center, the
Exchange will consider the existence of any clearly erroneous review of
a transaction in the subject security on another market center of which
it has actual knowledge, which may be indicative that the transaction
under review on such other market center was contemporaneous with the
transaction under review on the Exchange. However, the Exchange will
not be required to initiate communication with other market centers to
determine the existence of any such review(s).
    For purposes of the proposed rule, whenever the rule provides
authority for the Officer to modify or adjust a clearly erroneous
execution, in addition to the Officer's ability to declare a clearly
erroneous execution null and void, the Officer's authority to modify or
adjust the clearly erroneous execution is subject to the conditions
that there were no contemporaneous transactions on other markets and
that the Exchange had no actual knowledge of a clearly erroneous
execution review of a contemporaneous transaction of the subject
security on another market center, as described above.
    The Exchange also proposes adding language stating that a
determination shall be made generally within thirty (30) minutes of
receipt of the complaint, but in no case later than the start of the
regular trading hours of the Exchange on the following trading day.
Rulings made outside of thirty (30) minutes by an Officer will not fail
for lack of timeliness. The guideline simply provides participants an
appropriate expectation that a ruling will generally be made within
thirty (30) minutes and in no case later than the start of the regular
trading hours of the Exchange on the following trading day.
Appeals
    The Exchange proposes to amend the appeals procedure for trades
that are deemed to be clearly erroneous. First, the Exchange will no
longer accept appeal requests via facsimile. Similar to the proposed
language for an initial request for a ruling, all appeal requests must
be made via e-mail, except for those requests for appeals from Exchange
members who trade on the Floor of the Exchange. Members who trade on
the Floor of the Exchange may also submit requests for appeals in
person from the Floor.
    The current rule provides that the Exchange shall review and render
a

decision upon an appeal within a timeframe provided by the Exchange.
The proposed rule offers more definite guidelines to ensure the
expedient resolution of appeals. It requires the Exchange to review
appeals as soon as practicable, but generally on the same day as the
executions under review. Appeal requests received between 3 ET and the
close of trading should be made as soon as practicable, but in no case
later than the trading day following the date of the execution under
review. Appeal decisions will not fail for lack of timeliness. This
revised provision provides participants a reasonable expectation of
when a ruling on appeal will generally be made.
    Further, the proposed rule declares that any determination made by
an Officer or by the CEE Panel shall be rendered without prejudice as
to the right of the parties to the execution to submit their dispute to
arbitration. This provision simply clarifies the fact that nothing in
the proposed rule limits or impedes the rights of the parties to
arbitrate their dispute.
System Disruption and Malfunctions
    Currently, within the System Disruptions and Malfunctions section
of the Rule, after an Officer determines that a trade was clearly
erroneous he may declare the execution null and void or modify the
trade to attempt to achieve an equitable rectification of the error.
Under the proposed rule, when the Office determines that an execution
is clearly erroneous, the officer shall either declare the transaction
null and void or, if such transaction occurred only on the Exchange and
no contemporaneous transaction(s) occurred on another market center(s)
at a price that meets or exceeds the applicable Numerical Guidelines
and if the Exchange has no actual knowledge of a clearly erroneous
execution review of a contemporaneous transaction of the subject
security on another market center, modify one or more of the terms of
the transaction to achieve an equitable rectification of the error that
would place the parties in the same position, or as close as possible
to the same position that they would have been in, had the error not
occurred. This rule change supports the goal to provide market-wide
consistency to the resolution of clearly erroneous executions that
occur on multiple markets.
    The proposed rule also provides that, in the event of a disruption
or a malfunction, the Officer will rely on the proposed Numerical
Guidelines in determining whether an execution is clearly erroneous.
However, the Officer may also use a lower Numerical Guideline if
necessary to maintain a fair and orderly market, protect investors, and
protect the public interest. The proposed rule also adds that actions
taken under these circumstances must be taken within thirty (30)
minutes of detection of the erroneous execution in the ordinary case,
and by no later than the start of the regular trading hours of the
Exchange on the day following the date of the execution under review
when extraordinary circumstances exist.
Officers Acting on Their Own Motion
    The Exchange proposes to add a section to the Rule that will grant
an Officer the ability to act on his or her own motion to review
potentially erroneous executions. Under the current rule, an Officer
has the ability to act upon his or her own motion only in the event of
a System Disruption or Malfunction. The proposed rule would allow an
Officer to review executions and rely on the Numerical Guidelines under
any circumstance.
    Under the proposed rule, an Officer acting on its own motion, may
review potentially erroneous executions that occur on the Exchange and
shall either declare the transaction null and void or, if such
transaction occurred only on the Exchange and no contemporaneous
transaction(s) occurred on another market center(s) at a price that
meets or exceeds the applicable Numerical Guidelines and if the
Exchange has no actual knowledge of a clearly erroneous execution
review of a contemporaneous transaction of the subject security on
another market center, modify one or more of the terms of the
transaction to achieve an equitable rectification of the error that
would place the parties in the same position, or as close as possible
to the same position that they would have been in, had the error not
occurred. This rule change supports the goal to provide market-wide
consistency to the resolution of clearly erroneous executions that
occur on multiple markets.
    In extraordinary circumstances an Officer may apply a lower
Numerical Guideline to review a trade if it is determined that such
action is necessary to maintain a fair and orderly market or protect
investors and the public interest. In some instances the Exchange may
detect a single execution that breaches the Numerical Guidelines but is
not the subject of a ruling request. This provision gives the Exchange
the ability to review such executions. Additionally, in practice
clearly erroneous executions may involve multiple parties and multiple
executions. The Exchange proposes this provision to permit an Officer
to rule on a group of executions related to the same occurrence or
event as a whole, with or without a formal request for a ruling from an
affected party.
Trade Nullification and Price Adjustments for UTP Securities That Are
the Subject of Initial Public Offerings
    The proposed Rule also modifies the Exchange's policy on trade
nullification and UTP securities that are subject to initial public
offerings. Under the current Rule, a clearly erroneous execution may be
deemed to have occurred in the opening execution of the subject
security if the execution price of the opening execution on the
Exchange is the lesser of $1.00 or 10% away from the opening price on
the listing exchange or association. Under the proposed rule, in such
circumstances, the Officer shall either decline to take action in
connection with the completed transaction, declare the transaction null
and void or, if such transaction occurred only on the Exchange and no
contemporaneous transaction(s) occurred on another market center(s) at
a price that meets or exceeds the applicable Numerical Guidelines and
if the Exchange has no actual knowledge of a clearly erroneous
execution review of a contemporaneous transaction of the subject
security on another market center, adjust the transaction price to the
opening price on the listing exchange or association.
    Pursuant to the proposed rule, clearly erroneous executions of
subsequent executions of the subject security will be reviewed in the
same manner as the procedure set forth in (e)(1). Absent extraordinary
circumstances, action of the Officer must be taken in a timely fashion,
generally within thirty (30) minutes of the detection of the erroneous
execution. In extraordinary circumstances, the reviewing Officer may
take action by no later than the start of the regular trading hours of
the Exchange on the day following the date of the execution under
review.
2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) \6\ of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Exchange Act''), in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \7\ in particular in that it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and

coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system. The proposed rule
change provides transparency and finality for participants and creates
consistent results across U.S. equities exchanges with respect to
clearly erroneous executions. This proposed change further promotes the
maintenance of a fair and orderly market, the protection of investors
and the protection of the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \10\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \11\ permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange requests
that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so that it may
implement the new rule on October 5, 2009, the same date as the other
equities exchanges. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest because it will allow the Exchange to begin applying
the new rule on the same date as the other equities exchanges.\12\
Application of the new rule on this date should help foster
transparency and consistency among those exchanges that adopt clearly
erroneous execution rules substantially similar to those previously
approved by the Commission.\13\ For these reasons, the Commission
designates that the proposed rule change become operative on October 5,
2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \12\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposal's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60706 (September
22, 2009), 74 FR 49416 (September 28, 2009) (NYSEArca-2009-36).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2009-69 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2009-69. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2009-69 and should
be submitted on or before October 29, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-24246 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 118 (Monday, June 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35874-35875]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15260]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2277-023]

Union Electric Company (dba Ameren Missouri); Notice of
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Motions To Intervene and
Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: New Major License.
    b. Project No.: 2277-023.
    c. Date filed: June 24, 2008.
    d. Applicant: Union Electric Company (dba Ameren Missouri).
    e. Name of Project: Taum Sauk Pumped Storage Project.
    f. Location: On the East Fork of the Black River, in Reynolds
County, Missouri. The project occupies no federal lands.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Michael O. Lobbig, P.E., Managing Supervisor,
Hydro Licensing, Ameren Missouri, 3700 S. Lindbergh Blvd, St. Louis, MO
63127; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: Janet Hutzel, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by e-
mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing motions to intervene and protests: August
15, 2011.
    All documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration,
using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the
end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project.

Further, if an intervenor files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. This application has been accepted, but is not ready for
environmental analysis at this time.
    l. The existing Taum Sauk Pumped Storage Project consists of: (1) A
lower reservoir impounded by a concrete gravity dam downstream of the
confluence of the East Fork Black River and Taum Sauk Creek; (2) an
upper reservoir on the top of Proffit Mountain impounded by a rebuilt
roller-compacted concrete dam; (3) vertical shaft, rock and concrete-
lined tunnel sections, and a penstock conduit; (4) a pump-generating
plant with two reversible pump units and two motor generators with a
total installed capacity of 408 megawatts; (5) an excavated tailrace
and open channel to the lower reservoir; (6) a 138-kilovolt switchyard/
substation; (7) a gravel and sedimentation trap (bin wall) on the East
Fork of the Black River; and (8) associated ancillary equipment.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item h above.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.
    n. Anyone may submit a protest or a motion to intervene in
accordance with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18
CFR 385.210, 385.211, and 385.214. In determining the appropriate
action to take, the Commission will consider all protests filed, but
only those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with the
Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any protests
or motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
deadline date for the particular application.
    All filings must (1) bear in all capital letters the title
``PROTEST'' or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE;'' (2) set forth in the heading
the name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise
comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005.
Agencies may obtain copies of the application directly from the
applicant. A copy of any protest or motion to intervene must be served
upon each representative of the applicant specified in the particular
application.

    Dated: June 14, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-15260 Filed 6-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58578-58579]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18468]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-ORD-2020-0182; FRL-11281-01-ORD]

Availability of the IRIS Protocol for Vanadium and Compounds
(Inhalation)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing a 30-
day public comment period associated with release of the document,
Protocol for the Vanadium and Compounds (Inhalation) IRIS Assessment.
This document communicates the rationale for conducting the Integrated
Risk Information System (IRIS) assessment of vanadium and compounds
(inhalation), describes screening criteria to identify relevant
literature, outlines the approach for evaluating study quality, and
describes the methods for dose-response analysis.

DATES: The 30-day public comment period begins August 28, 2023 and ends
September 27, 2023. Comments must be received on or before September
27, 2023.

ADDRESSES: The Protocol for the Vanadium and Compounds (Inhalation)
IRIS Assessment will be available via the internet on the IRIS website
at https://www.epa.gov/iris and in the public docket at http://www.regulations.gov, Docket ID: EPA-HQ-ORD-2020-0182.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on the docket, contact
the ORD Docket at the EPA Headquarters Docket Center; email:
[email protected].
    For technical information on the protocol, contact Mr. Dahnish
Shams, Center for Public Health & Environmental Assessment; email:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background Information on the IRIS Program and Systematic Review
Protocols

    EPA's IRIS Program is a human health assessment program that
evaluates quantitative and qualitative information on effects that may
result from exposure to chemicals found in the environment. Through the
IRIS Program, EPA provides high quality science-based human health
assessments to support the Agency's regulatory activities and decisions
to protect public health.
    As part of developing a draft IRIS assessment, EPA presents a
methods document, referred to as the protocol, for conducting a
chemical-specific systematic review of the available scientific
literature. EPA is seeking public comment on components of the protocol
including the described strategies for literature searches, criteria
for study inclusion or exclusion, considerations for evaluating study
methods, information management for extracting data, approaches for
synthesis within and across lines of evidence, and methods for
derivation of toxicity values. The protocol serves to inform the
subsequent development of the draft assessment and is made available to
the public. EPA may update the protocol based on the evaluation of the
literature, and any updates will be posted to the docket and on the
IRIS website.

II. How To Submit Technical Comments to the Docket at https://www.regulations.gov

    Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-ORD-2020-
0182 for Vanadium and Compounds (Inhalation), by one of the following
methods:
     www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
     Email: [email protected].
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket
Center (ORD Docket), Mail Code: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20460. The phone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For information on visiting the EPA Docket Center Public Reading
Room, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>. The public can submit comments via
www.regulations.gov or email.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket number EPA-HQ-ORD-
2020-0182 for vanadium. Please ensure that your comments are submitted
within the specified comment period. Comments received after the
closing date will be marked ``late,'' and may only be considered if
time permits. It is EPA's policy to include all comments it receives in
the public docket without change and to make the comments available
online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless a comment includes information claimed to
be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information for
which disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
through https://www.regulations.gov or email that you consider to be
CBI or otherwise protected. The https://www.regulations.gov website is
an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Docket: Documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other materials,
such as copyrighted material, are publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or as a hard copy at the ORD Docket in
the EPA Headquarters Docket Center.

Wayne Cascio,
Director, Center for Public Health & Environmental Assessment.
[FR Doc. 2023-18468 Filed 8-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 87 (Tuesday, May 5, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 26680]
[FR Doc No: 2020-09579]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Number: PR20-46-001.
    Applicants: AMP Intrastate Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: AMP Intrastate
Amended SOC Filing to be effective 2/24/2020.
    Filed Date: 4/24/2020.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>69.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/2020.

    Docket Number: PR20-48-001.
    Applicants: Bridgeline Holdings, L.P.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b)(2),(: Amendment to 48 to
be effective 4/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 4/24/2020.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>83.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/2020.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-923-008.
    Applicants: Enable Mississippi River Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Implement Settlement Tariff Sheets
in Dockets RP18-923, RP20-131 and RP20-212 to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/28/20.
    Accession Number: 20200428-5139.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/11/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-809-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Compliance filing 2020 Operational Purchases and Sales
Report.
    Filed Date: 4/28/20.
    Accession Number: 20200428-5001.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/11/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-810-000.
    Applicants: Northern Border Pipeline Company.
    Description: Compliance filing 2020 Operational Purchases and Sales
Report.
    Filed Date: 4/28/20.
    Accession Number: 20200428-5070.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/11/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-811-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Update Filing
(Conoco May 20) to be effective 5/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 4/28/20.
    Accession Number: 20200428-5089.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/11/20.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered,
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 29, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-09579 Filed 5-4-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P