[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 212-214]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27980]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0970]
RIN 1625-AA11

Regulated Navigation Area; Thea Foss, Middle Waterway, and
Wheeler-Osgood Waterways EPA Superfund Cleanup Site, Commencement Bay,
Tacoma, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending the Thea Foss and Wheeler-Osgood
Regulated Navigation Area (RNA) for Commencement Bay to establish a
permanent regulated navigation area within the Middle Waterway. This
action is necessary to protect sediment cap areas in the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's Commencement Bay Nearshore-Tideflats
Superfund Cleanup Site within the Middle Waterway. This RNA would
prohibit certain activities that could disrupt the integrity of the
engineered sediment caps placed within the Middle Waterway.

DATES: This rule is effective February 3, 2020.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2018-0970 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Zachary Spence, Sector Puget Sound
Waterways Management Branch, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On April 5, 2005, the Middle Waterway Action Committee requested
the establishment of a regulated navigation area to prohibit activities
that could compromise the integrity of the sediment caps placed over
the contaminated sites within the Middle Waterway. In 2006 and 2015,
the Coast Guard issued NPRMs related to this issued but never finalized
the rule. On March 6, 2019, the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled Regulated Navigation Area; Thea Foss
and Wheeler-Osgood Waterways EPA Superfund Cleanup Site, Commencement
Bay, Tacoma, WA 84 FR 8051. There we stated why we issued the NPRM, and
invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related to this
regulated navigation area. During the comment period that ended April
6, 2019, we received two comments.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Coast Guard District Thirteen
Commander has determined that there are potential hazards associated
with the five Environmental Protection Agency's Superfund Cleanup Sites
located within the Middle Waterway. The purpose of this rule is to
ensure safety of persons and environment within the navigable waters of
the Middle Waterway by prohibiting activities that could compromise the
integrity of the engineered sediment caps.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    As noted above, we received two comments on our NPRM published
March 6, 2019. One comment we received was in support of the rule.
    The second comment discussed current marine operations prohibited
by this rule, these operations include marine piling construction,
anchoring system for a dry-dock, and other mooring systems. The
commenter discussed these operations occur within the proposed
regulated navigation area but outside of the five separate contaminated
sites contained within the Middle Waterway Regulated Navigation Area.
Additionally, the comment discussed concerns over the ingress and
egress of tugboats within the designated area.
    The Coast Guard is aware marine operations occur within the
regulated navigation area that do disturb the seabed outside of the
contaminated Superfund cleanup sites. In the initial request for a
regulated navigation area submitted by the Middle Waterway Action
Committee, April 5, 2005, we were informed of the dry-dock anchored
outside one of the sediment caps within the waterway. The COTP, upon
written request, may authorize a waiver from this regulation. The COTP
will consult with the Environmental Protection Agency in making this
determination when necessary and practicable.
    The vessel traffic navigating within the regulated navigation area
is not prohibited by this regulation and therefore falls outside the
scope of this rulemaking.
    There are no changes in the regulatory text of this rule from the
proposed rule in the NPRM.
    This rule amends the Thea Foss and Wheeler Osgood Waterway by
establishing a permanent regulated navigation area for the Middle
Waterway. The purpose of this rule is to prevent the disturbance of the
five sediment caps established within the Middle Waterway Problem Area
of the Superfund Cleanup Site that are not geographically encompassed
by the

Thea Foss and Wheeler-Osgood Waterways RNA. Disrupting the integrity of
the caps in this area may result in a hazardous condition harming the
marine environment and the public. Therefore, this proposed RNA
expansion is necessary to protect the integrity of the caps and will do
so by prohibiting maritime activities that could cause disturbance or
damage.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the small
geographic area encompassed by the RNA, and the limited amount of
commercial and recreational traffic passing through the area.
Additionally, prohibited activities are not routine in the designated
area.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
regulated navigation area may be small entities, for the reasons stated
in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    In preparation for this rulemaking, we identified the area
encompassed by the proposed rule overlaps with the usual and accustomed
fishing grounds for the Puyallup and Muckleshoot tribes. We informed
both tribes of the proposed rulemaking, but only received a response
from the Muckleshoot tribe. We conducted a meeting with the Muckleshoot
tribe's Fish Commission on September 12, 2018. During this meeting, the
Muckleshoot Fish Commission and the Coast Guard discussed potential
impacts of the proposed rulemaking on the Muckleshoot tribe. Following
the meeting, the Coast Guard concluded that this proposed rule does not
have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, as it would not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
    If you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
amending a regulated navigation area that would prohibit activities
that could disturb the engineered sediment caps on the seabed. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A
Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without

jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. In Sec.  165.1329, revise the section heading, add paragraph (a)(4),
and revise paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) to read as follows:

Sec.  165.1329   Regulated Navigation Area; Thea Foss, Middle Waterway,
and Wheeler-Osgood Waterways EPA Superfund Cleanup Site, Commencement
Bay, Tacoma, WA.

    (a) * * *
    (4) All waters of the Middle Waterway south of a line connecting a
point of the shore at 47[deg]15'51'' N, 122[deg]25'53'' W; thence
southwest to 47[deg]15'48.6858'' N, 122[deg]26'02.2374'' W; thence
south to 47[deg]15'46.7316'' N, 122[deg]26'01.1214'' W [Datum: NAD
1983].
    (b) * * *
    (1) All vessels and persons are prohibited from activities that
would disturb the seabed, such as anchoring, dragging, spudding, or
other activities that involve disrupting the integrity of the sediment
caps installed in the designated regulated navigation area, pursuant to
the remediation efforts of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) and others in the Thea Foss, Middle Waterway, and Wheeler-Osgood
Waterways EPA superfund cleanup site. Vessels may otherwise transit or
navigate within this area without reservation.
    (2) The prohibition described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section
does not apply to vessels or persons engaged in activities associated
with remediation efforts in the Thea Foss, Middle Waterway, or Wheeler-
Osgood Waterways superfund sites, provided that the Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound (COTP), is given advance notice of those activities
by the EPA.
* * * * *

    Dated: September 26, 2019.
A.J. Vogt,
RADM, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2019-27980 Filed 1-2-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16815-16817]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07909]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0332]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Lower Tchefuncte River, Madisonville, LA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
for certain navigable waters of the Tchefuncte River. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters
near Madisonville, LA, during a fireworks display on July 4, 2018. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in
the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector New
Orleans or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 17, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0332 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Commander Howard Vacco, Sector New Orleans,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On April 4, 2018, Geaux Pyro notified the Coast Guard that it would
conduct a fireworks display from 7 p.m. through 7:20 p.m. on July 4,
2018, for a wedding celebration. The fireworks are to be launched from
a barge on the Tchefuncte River, at approximate position
30[deg]24'11.63'' N 090[deg]09'17.39'' W, in front of the Madisonville
Town Hall. Hazards from firework displays include accidental discharge
of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers or other
debris. The Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be
used in this display would be a safety concern for anyone within 100
yards of the launch barge.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within a 100-yard

radius of the launch barge before, during, and after the fireworks
display. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33
U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 6:45 p.m. through
7:45 p.m. on July 4, 2018. The safety zone would cover all navigable
waters of the Tchefuncte River within 100-yards of a barge at
approximate position 30[deg]24'11.63'' N 090[deg]09'17.39'' W, in front
of the Madisonville Town Hall in Madisonville, LA. The duration of the
zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable
waters before, during, and after the scheduled 7 p.m. to 7:20 p.m.
fireworks display. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative. A designated representative is a commissioned, warrant,
or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard assigned to units under the
operational control of USCG Sector New Orleans.
    Vessels requiring entry into this safety zone must request
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. They may be
contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16 or 67 or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Persons and vessels permitted to enter this safety zone must transit at
their slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful directions issued
by the COTP or the designated representative. The regulatory text we
are proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size and
duration of the safety zone. This proposed safety zone would only
encompass a 100-yard radius of the Tchefuncte River for one hour on one
evening. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the proposed
rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rulemaking would
have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rulemaking would
affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction
and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary
determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule involves a safety zone lasting one hour
that would prohibit entry within a 100-yard radius of a barge at
approximate position of 30[deg]24'11.63'' N 090[deg]09'17.39'' W on the
Tchefuncte River. Normally

such actions are categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0332 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T08-0332  Safety Zone; Tchefuncte River, New Orleans, LA.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of the Tchefuncte River, 100-yards around a barge at approximate
position 30[deg]24'11.63'' N 090[deg]09'17.39'' W, in front of the
Madisonville Town Hall in Madisonville, LA.
    (b) Effective period. This section is effective from 6:45 p.m.
through 7:45 p.m. on July 4, 2018.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans
(COTP) or designated representative. A designated representative is a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard
assigned to units under the operational control of USCG Sector New
Orleans.
    (2) Vessels requiring entry into this safety zone must request
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. They may be
contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16 or 67 or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Persons and vessels permitted to enter this safety zone must
transit at their slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful
directions issued by the COTP or the designated representative.
    (d) Information broadcasts. The COTP or a designated representative
will inform the public through Broadcast Notices to Mariners of any
changes in the planned schedule.

    Dated: April 11, 2018.
Wayne R. Arguin,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans.
[FR Doc. 2018-07909 Filed 4-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: February 25, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 38)]
[Notices]
[Page 10609]
[DOCID:fr25fe11-74]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2006-N-0237] (formerly 2006N-0061)

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office
of Management and Budget Approval; Charging for Investigational Drugs

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
collection of information entitled ``Charging for Investigational
Drugs'' has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of December 14, 2006
(71 FR 75168), the Agency announced that the proposed information
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44
U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0651.
The approval expires on December 31, 2011. A copy of the supporting
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: February 18, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4217 Filed 2-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P