[Federal Register: September 11, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 175)]
[Notices]
[Page 53450-53451]
[DOCID:fr11se06-76]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Application for Transfer of License, and Soliciting
Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

September 5, 2006.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Transfer of License.
    b. Project No.: 2512-060.
    c. Date Filed: August 31, 2006.
    d. Applicants: Alloy Power, LLC (transferor) and Hawks Nest Hydro
LLC (Transferee).
    e. Name and Location of Project: The Hawks Nest--Glen Ferris
Project is located on the New and Kanawha Rivers in Fayette County,
West Virginia.
    f. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    g. Applicant Contacts: For the transferor: James F. Bowe, Jr., Hugh
E. Hilliard, Dewey Ballantine LLP, 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20006,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For the transferee: Amy S. Koch, Jennifer Lokenvitz Schwitzer,
Patton Boggs LLP, 2550 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037, (202) 457-
5618.
    h. FERC Contact: Robert Bell at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. Deadline for filing comments, protests, and motions to
intervene: September 22, 2006.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Comments, protests, and
interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of
paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the
Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission
strongly encourages electronic filings. Please include the Project
Number on any comments or motions filed.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing a document with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person in the official service list for the
project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the documents on that resource agency.
    j. Description of Application: Applicants seek Commission approval
to transfer the license for the Hawks Nest--Glen Ferris Project from
Alloy Power, LLC (Alloy) to Hawks Nest Hydro LLC (Hawks Nest).
    k. This filing is available for review at the Commission in the
Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at
http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number

(P-2512) in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is

also available for inspection and reproduction at the addresses in item
g above.
    l. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    m. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all

protests or other comments filed, but only those who file a motion to
intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules may become a party
to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or motions to intervene must
be received on or before the specified comment date for the particular
application.
    n. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filings must
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or
``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable, and the Project Number of the
particular application to which the filing refers. Any of the above-
named documents must be filed by providing the original and eight
copies to: The Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. A copy of any motion to
intervene must also be served upon each representative of the
Applicants specified in the particular application.
    o. Agency Comments: Federal, State, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicants.
If an agency does not file comments within the time specified for
filing comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of
an agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicants'
representatives.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-14967 Filed 9-8-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: August 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 165)]
[Notices]
[Page 52521-52522]
[DOCID:fr26au10-46]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

August 19, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC10-85-000.
    Applicants: Mystic Development, LLC, Boston Generating, LLC, Mystic
I, LLC, Fore River Development, LLC, Constellation Mystic Power, LLC.
    Description: Joint Application for Authorization of Disposition of
Jurisdictional Facilities of Fore River Development, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 08/18/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100818-5113.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 8, 2010.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER99-1005-013; ER09-304-004.
    Applicants: Kansas City Power & Light Company, KCP&L Greater
Missouri Operations Company.
    Description: Kansas City Power & Light Company and KCP&L Greater
Missouri Operations Company Notice of Non-Material Change in Status.
    Filed Date: 08/18/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100818-5112.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 8, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1881-001.
    Applicants: Stuyvesant Energy L.L.C.
    Description: Amendment to Application of Stuyvesant Energy L.L.C.
    Filed Date: 08/18/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100818-5111.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 8, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1757-001.
    Applicants: Florida Power Corporation.
    Description: Florida Power Corporation submits tariff filing per
35.17(b): Florida Power Corporation Cost-Based Rate Tariff No. 1
Amendment to be effective 7/13/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100819-5021.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 9, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER00-2529-004.
    Applicants: Dow Pipeline Company.
    Description: Dow Pipeline Company submits Order No 697 Compliance
Filing, updated market power analysis, revisions to market-based rate
tariff, and request to file out of time.
    Filed Date: 08/18/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100819-0203.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 18, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2202-000.
    Applicants: Central Maine Power Company.
    Description: Central Maine Power Co. submits a Notice of
Cancellation of Interconnection Agreement.
    Filed Date: 08/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100812-0206.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2204-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. submits a Capital Budget
Quarterly filing for second quarter of 2010.
    Filed Date: 08/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100812-0207.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2280-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits Schedule 1 of the
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement.
    Filed Date: 08/18/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100819-0204.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2281-000.
    Applicants: Constellation Mystic Power, LLC.
    Description: Constellation Mystic Power, LLC submits an Application
for Order Authorizing Market-Based Rates, Certain Waivers, and Blanket
Authorizations.
    Filed Date: 08/18/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100819-0201.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 8, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2282-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: 2010-08-19 CAISO Service
Agreement 1647, LGIA for SCE and Desert Sunlight to be effective 8/10/
2010.
    Filed Date: 08/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100819-5084.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 9, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2283-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits tariff filing per 35: SECA Compliance to be effective 7/28/
2010.
    Filed Date: 08/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100819-5095.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 9, 2010.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES10-54-000.
    Applicants: MDU Resources Group, Inc.
    Description: Application of MDU Resources Group, Inc. under New
Docket for authority to issue up to $1 billion worth of various
securities for the next 2 years.
    Filed Date: 08/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100819-5050.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 9, 2010.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    As it relates to any qualifying facility filings, the notices of
self-certification [or self-recertification] listed above, do not
institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status. A notice
of self-certification [or self-recertification] simply provides
notification that the entity making the filing has determined the
facility named in the notice meets the applicable criteria to be a
qualifying facility. Intervention and/or protest do not lie in dockets
that are qualifying facility self-certifications or self-
recertifications. Any person seeking to challenge such qualifying
facility status may do so by filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR
292.207(d)(iii). Intervention and protests may be filed in response to
notices of qualifying facility dockets other than self-certifications
and self-recertifications.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be

listed as a contact for an intervenor must create and validate an
eRegistration account using the eRegistration link. Select the eFiling
link to log on and submit the intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21231 Filed 8-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


OMB Control No. xxxx-xxxx

During the past three months energy efficiency improvements were completed on your home by

    <contractor name>    . To help us evaluate the quality of work performed by contractors that participate in the Home Performance with ENERGY STAR program please complete our short (3 questions) customer satisfaction survey.  You can complete this survey online at: http://www.energystar.gov/feedback

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY

Contactor Name: ____________________

How satisfied were you with the following aspects of the work you had done.

	Check the appropriate box.

	Very

Satisfied

Satisfied

Dissatisfied	Very

Dissatisfied	Unknown or Not Applicable

Information from initial energy audit	G	G	G	G	G

Listened to my concerns and goals	G	G	G	G	G

Explanation of work to be done and why	G	G	G	G	G

Quality of work done	G	G	G	G	G

Speed and timeliness of work	G	G	G	G	G

Clean up after work done	G	G	G	G	G

Overall satisfaction with work done	G	G	G	G	G

How did you hear abut this contractor?

G	Web site

G	Referral from friend/family

G	TV ad

G	Radio ad

G	Newspaper ad

G	Yellow pages

G	Other (please describe) ________________________________________

____________________________________________________________

Would you recommend this contractor or Home Performance with ENERGY STAR to a friend?

G	Yes

G	No

Please share any comments or concerns about your experience. ________________________________________________________________________ ____

________________________________________________________________________ ____

Home Performance with ENERGY STAR is a program sponsored by the U.S Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Energy.  For more information visit   HYPERLINK "http://www.energystar.gov"  www.energystar.gov .

EPA Form 5900-182

The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 0.05 hours and welcomes suggestions for reducing this effort. Send comments (referencing OMB Control Number) to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.

  PAGE  2


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 228 (Monday, November 28, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 85560]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28435]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9955-63-Region 9]

Notice of Approval of Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant
Deterioration Permit for Ocotillo Power Plant

AGENCY: United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final agency action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces that the Maricopa County Air Quality
Department (MCAQD) issued a final permit decision to Arizona Public
Service (APS) for a major modification of a Clean Air Act Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit (Permit No. PSD16-01). The PSD
permit decision authorizes a major modification at the Ocotillo Power
Plant, located in Tempe, Arizona, primarily for the purposes of
constructing five simple cycle natural gas-fired combustion turbines,
including ancillary equipment. The MCAQD is authorized to issue PSD
permit decisions pursuant to a delegation agreement with the EPA, in
which the MCAQD ``stands in the shoes'' of the EPA when administering
certain elements of the PSD permitting program. This MCAQD-issued PSD
permit decision is considered to be a federally-issued PSD permit
decision, and serves as a final agency action by the EPA.

DATES: The MCAQD issued a final PSD permit decision for the Ocotillo
Power Plant on September 9, 2016. The permit became effective on that
date. Pursuant to section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.
7607(b)(1), judicial review of this final permit decision, to the
extent it is available, may be sought by filing a petition for review
in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit within 60
days of November 28, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Documents relevant to the above-referenced permit are
available for public inspection during normal business hours at the
following addresses:
    (1) Maricopa County Air Quality Department, 1001 North Central
Avenue, Suite 124, Phoenix, Arizona 85004. To arrange for viewing of
these documents, please call<PHONE_NUMBER> or visit online at http://www.maricopa.gov/aq/contact_us/public_records/Default.aspx.
    (2) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901. To arrange for viewing of
these documents, call Eugene Chen at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Due to building security procedures, at least 48
hours advance notice is required.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene Chen, EPA Region 9, (415) 947-
4304<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Anyone who wishes to review the EPA
Environmental Appeals Board's (EAB) decision described below or
documents in the EAB's electronic docket for its decision can obtain
them at http://www.epa.gov/eab/.

NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The MCAQD issued
a final PSD permit to APS on March 22, 2016, authorizing a major
modification to the Ocotillo Power Plant. EPA regulations at 40 CFR
124.19 provided an opportunity for administrative review by the EPA's
EAB of this initial permit decision.
    The EPA's EAB received one petition for review of the permit, and
on September 1, 2016, the EAB issued an Order denying the petition for
review. See In re Arizona Public Service Company Ocotillo Power Plant,
PSD Appeal No. 16-01 (EAB, September 1, 2016) (Order Denying Review).
Following the EAB's action, pursuant to 40 CFR 52.21(u) and the MCAQD's
PSD delegation agreement with the EPA, the MCAQD issued a final permit
decision on September 9, 2016. All conditions of PSD Permit No. PSD16-
01, as initially issued by the MCAQD on March 22, 2016, were final and
effective as of September 9, 2016.

    Dated: November 3, 2016.
Elizabeth Adams,
Acting Director, Air Division, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2016-28435 Filed 11-25-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: February 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 32)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 7209-7212]
[DOCID:fr18fe10-5]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0811; Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-41-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Corporation (RRC) AE 3007A
Series Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for RRC AE 3007A series turbofan engines. This proposed AD would
require removing or performing initial and repetitive eddy current
inspections (ECIs) or surface wave ultrasonic testing (SWUT)
inspections on high-pressure turbine (HPT) stage 2 wheels for cracks.
This proposed AD also reduces the approved life limits of certain HPT
stage 2 wheels. This proposed AD results from reports of cracked HPT
stage 2 wheels. We are proposing this AD to prevent uncontained failure
of the HPT stage 2 wheel and damage to the airplane.

DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by March 22,
2010.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    You can get the service information identified in this proposed AD
from Rolls-Royce Corporation, P.O. Box 420, Speed Code U15,
Indianapolis, IN 46206-0420, e-mail: indy.pubs.services@rolls-
royce.com.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyri Zaroyiannis, Aerospace Engineer,
Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, Small Airplane Directorate, FAA,
2300 E. Devon Ave., Des Plaines, IL 60018; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send us any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposal. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0811; Directorate
Identifier 2008-NE-41-AD'' in the subject line of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD
in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including, if provided, the name of the individual who
sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477-78).

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
the same as the Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

Discussion

    On September 8, 2008, we issued emergency AD 2008-19-51 that
applied to RRC AE 3007A series turbofan engines. That AD required
performing initial and repetitive eddy current inspections (ECIs) on
HPT stage 2 wheels that have accumulated 6,500 or more cycles-since-new
(CSN). That AD resulted from reports of HPT stage 2 wheels that had
cracks in the bores of the wheels. This condition, if not corrected,
could result in a possible uncontained failure of the HPT stage 2
wheel, which could cause damage to the airplane.

Actions Since AD 2008-19-51 Was Issued

    After we issued emergency AD 2008-19-51, we determined that the
cracks in the HPT stage 2 wheel bores are caused by a thermally-induced
high stress in the disk bore, which was not identified at the time of
the original certification. We performed a new risk assessment for
cracking in the bore of the HPT stage 2 wheel using the FAA methodology
guidelines in FAA Advisory Circular 39-8 and the results of the
inspections from AD 2008-19-51. The risk assessment takes into account
physical characteristics about the cracks that were not available when
we issued AD 2008-19-51. The new risk assessment, in combination with a
sufficient number of early inspections, showed that the risk profile
was not rapidly increasing, which was a concern when we issued AD 2008-
19-51. Using this new information, we determined we could change the
compliance requirements for the ECI while still maintaining a level of
safety consistent with the intent of the original AD 2008-19-51. We
changed the new compliance schedule to an interval of 150 cycles-in-
service (CIS) between wheel populations. The intervals for the wheel
populations were based on CSN, and they varied because of the
distribution of the affected wheels throughout the fleet at that time.
A distribution based on CSN resulted in a compliance schedule that
inspected the fleet from the highest time, highest risk

wheels to the lowest time, lowest risk wheels. It allowed us to control
the overall risk consistent with the intent of AD 2008-19-51.
    We also determined that a requirement to perform the ECI by a
certain CIS is by itself sufficient to maintain the level of safety
consistent with the intent of the original AD 2008-19-51. Because of
that determination, we no longer prohibit installing any engine that
had an HPT stage 2 wheel with more than 6,500 CSN unless the wheel was
inspected. Instead, we modified that requirement to apply only to HPT
stage 2 wheels removed from service as a result of complying with AD
2008-26-06 or emergency AD 2008-19-51.
    Finally, we specified the part numbers (P/Ns) for the affected HPT
stage 2 wheels to ensure proper identification.
    On December 12, 2008, we issued AD 2008-26-06 as an immediately
adopted rule to mandate a short-term program (90 days) to ensure the
continued airworthiness of the product. That AD published in the
Federal Register on December 24, 2008 (73 FR 78927).

Actions Since AD 2008-26-06 Was Issued

    A few months after we issued AD 2008-26-06 we received reports of
additional cracks in the HPT stage 2 wheels. A revised risk assessment
that included these additional reports indicated that we needed to
require a higher inspection rate. For this reason, we issued Emergency
AD 2009-08-51 on April 10, 2009. That AD also provides instructions for
an optional SWUT inspection. We then published a final rule; request
for comments (74 FR 22091, May 12, 2009) to make the emergency actions
applicable to all persons.
    We are now proceeding through the normal rule making process to
ensure full public comment on our proposed actions. In this proposed
AD, we are still requiring the same removal from service or ECI or SWUT
inspections, but we are expanding the scope of the compliance schedule
to more engines by including wheels with lower CSN. We are also
including a requirement for repetitive inspections. In addition, we
have identified by serial number a group of HPT stage 2 wheels that
were repaired while in-service; because of this repair those wheels can
only be inspected by the ECI method. We have also determined that the
engine cycle life limit (ECLL) of the HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N 23075345
and 23084520, covered by this proposed AD should be reduced to 23,000
CSN and that the ECLL of all other part number HPT stage 2 wheels
covered by this proposed AD should be reduced to 20,000 CSN on the
effective date of this AD.
    The occurrence of cracked HPT stage 2 wheels has been shown by
statistical analysis of field data to have a causal link to a
manufacturing process that led to incomplete shot peening on the drive
arm fillets (shaft inner diameter fillet) of the wheel. Improvements to
the fixed manufacturing process have addressed this incomplete peening
condition. Therefore, HPT stage 2 wheels that have been determined to
have been fully shot peened in the drive arm fillet are excluded from
the inspection requirements of this proposed AD.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed and approved the technical contents of:
     RRC Alert Service Bulletin AE 3007A-A-72-367, Revision 2,
dated June 22, 2009, that describes procedures for ECI of the HPT stage
2 wheel on AE 3007A series engines.
     RRC Service Bulletin AE 3007A-72-368, Revision 2, dated
April 28, 2009, that describes the procedures for SWUT inspection of
the HPT stage 2 wheel on AE 3007A series turbofan engines.
     RRC Service Bulletin AE 3007A-72-369, Revision 2, dated
November 5, 2009, that describes the procedures for SWUT inspection of
the HPT stage 2 wheel on AE 3007A series turbofan engines.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other products
of this same type design. We are proposing this AD, which would
require:
     Removing from service any engine with certain P/N HPT
stage 2 wheels that have a CSN specified in Table 1 of this AD by the
compliance time specified in Table 1 of this AD; or
     Performing an ECI or SWUT inspection on certain P/N HPT
stage 2 wheels that have a CSN specified in Table 1 of this AD by the
compliance time specified in Table 1 of this AD; and
     Performing repetitive ECI or SWUT inspections of the HPT
stage 2 wheels within 3,000 cycles-since-last inspection.
    You must use the service information described previously to
perform the actions required by this AD.

Interim Action

    These actions are interim actions and we may take further
rulemaking actions in the future.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 1402 engines
installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 2 work-hours per engine to perform both the proposed ECI and
proposed SWUT. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. No parts
are required for the inspection. We estimate the prorated life lost per
stage 2 wheel is about $13,177. Based on these figures, we estimate the
total cost of the proposed AD to U.S. operators to be $18,712,494. This
estimate is exclusive of any warranty coverage.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. You may get a copy of this summary at the
address listed under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:

Rolls-Royce Corporation (Formerly Allison Engine Company): Docket
No. FAA-2009-0811; Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-41-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive
comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) action by March 22,
2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2009-08-51.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Rolls-Royce Corporation (RRC) AE 3007A
series turbofan engines with high-pressure turbine (HPT) stage 2
wheels, part numbers (P/Ns) 23069438, 23069592, 23074462, 23074644,
23075345, or 23084520 installed. These engines are installed on, but
not limited to, Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S. A. (EMBRAER)
EMB-135 and EMB-145 airplanes.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from reports of cracked HPT stage 2 wheels.
We are issuing this AD to prevent uncontained failure of the HPT
stage 2 wheel and damage to the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.

HPT Stage 2 Wheels Exempted From the Inspection Requirements of This AD

    (f) The following engines are exempt from the inspection
requirements of this AD:
    (1) All engines with an HPT stage 2 wheel, P/N 23084520.
    (2) All engines with an HPT stage 2 wheel, P/N 23075345, that
has a serial number (S[sol]N) specified in Table 1 of this AD, and
    (3) All engines with an HPT stage 2 wheel, P/N 23074462, that
has a S/N specified in Table 2 of this AD.

Table 1--HPT Stage 2 Wheel, P/N 23075345 by S/N Excluded From Inspection
                 Requirements (g) Through (i) of This AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
MM507646                 MM508211                 MM508319
MM508144                 MM508221                 MM508320
MM508153                 MM508241                 MM508322
MM508176                 MM508248                 MM508337
MM508186                 MM508251                 MM508338
MM508188                 MM508264                 MM508382
MM508205                 MM508305                 MM508387
MM508208                 MM508311
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 2--HPT Stage 2 Wheel, P/N 23074462 by S/N Excluded From Inspection
                 Requirements (g) Through (i) of This AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
MM504890                MM505025                MM505054
MM504963                MM505034                MM505055
MM504990                MM505041                MM505056
MM504995                MM505045                MM505061
MM505007                MM505046                All ``MM'' prefix S/Ns
                                                 higher than MM505061.
MM505017                MM505048                All S/Ns with ``MW''
                                                 prefix.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Initial Eddy Current Inspection (ECI) or Surface Wave Ultrasonic
Testing (SWUT) Inspection

    (g) For engines with an HPT stage 2 wheel, P/Ns 23069438,
23069592, 23074462, 23074644, or 23075345, remove the engine from
service or perform an initial inspection of the wheel by the cycle
limit specified in Table 3 of this AD. Use one of the following
methods for the inspection:
    (1) For HPT stage 2 wheels that have S/Ns listed in Table 4 of
this AD, use paragraphs 2.A. through 2.C.(4) of RRC Alert Service
Bulletin (ASB) AE 3007A-A-72-367, Revision 2 dated June 22, 2009, to
inspect the wheel.
    (2) For HPT stage 2 wheels that have S/Ns not listed in Table 4
of this AD, use paragraphs 2.A. through 2.C.(4) of RRC ASB AE 3007A-
A-72-367, Revision 2, dated June 22, 2009, or use paragraphs 2.A.
through 2.N. of RRC Service Bulletin (SB) AE 3007A-72-368, Revision
2, dated April 28, 2009; or use 2.A. through 2.V.(4) of RRC SB AE
3007A-72-369, Revision 2, dated November 5, 2009, to perform the
inspections.

 Table 3--Compliance Times for Engine Removal or ECI or SWUT Inspection
           of the HPT Stage 2 Wheels by Cycles-Since-New (CSN)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Remove engine from service or
    For HPT stage 2 wheels with the          inspect wheel within the
 following CSN on the effective date of    following cycles-in-service
                this AD:                  (CIS) after the effective date
                                                   of this AD:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) 17,500 or more CSN.................  Remove engine from service or
                                          inspect before next flight.
(4) 10,000 to 17,499 CSN...............  15 CIS.
(5) 9,999 or fewer CSN.................  Before accumulating 10,015 CSN.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Table 4--S/Ns of HPT Stage 2 Wheels To Be Inspected by SB AE 3007A-72-
                          367 (ECI Method Only)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
              HPT Stage 2 Wheels Requiring ECI Method Only
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MM119400                             MM183796
MM119480                             MM183808
MM119508                             MM183831
MM155847                             MM228730
MM155907                             MM228951
MM155908                             MM503748
MM183236                             MM504004
MM183362                             MM57188
MM183754                             MM57440
MM183762                             MM57480
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Installation Prohibition

    (h) After the effective date of this AD, don't return to
service, any HPT stage 2 wheel that was installed in any RRC AE
3007A series engine that has been removed as a result of the
inspection requirements of this AD, unless the HPT stage 2 wheel was
inspected as specified in RRC ASB AE 3007A-A-72-367, Revision 2,
dated June 22, 2009; or RRC SB AE 3007A-72-368, Revision 2, dated
April 28, 2009; or RRC SB AE 3007A-72-369, Revision 2, dated
November 5, 2009.

Repetitive Inspection

    (i) Thereafter, within 3,000 cycles-since-last inspection,
remove the engine from service until an ECI or SWUT inspection is
performed on the HPT stage 2 wheel. Use paragraphs 2.A. through
2.C.(4) of RRC ASB AE 3007A-A-72-367, Revision 2, dated June 22,
2009, or use paragraphs 2.A. through 2.N. of RRC SB AE 3007A-72-368,
Revision 2, dated April 28, 2009; or use 2.A. through 2.V.(4) of RRC
SB AE 3007A-72-369, Revision 2, dated November 5, 2009, to inspect
the wheel.

New, Reduced Engine Cycle Life Limit and Removal From Service

    (j) For HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N 23084520, do the following:
    (1) For wheels that have 22,985 CSN or more on the effective
date of this AD, remove

the wheel from service within 15 CIS after the effective date of
this AD.
    (2) Thereafter, remove HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N 23084520, before
exceeding the new, reduced engine cycle life limit (ECLL) of 23,000
CSN.
    (k) For HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N 23075345 and 23074644, do the
following:
    (1) For wheels that have 19,985 CSN or more on the effective
date of this AD, remove the wheel from service within 15 CIS after
the effective date of this AD unless paragraph (k)(3) of this AD
applies.
    (2) Thereafter, remove HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N 23075345 and
23074644, before exceeding the new, reduced ECLL of 20,000 CSN.
    (3) For HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N 23075345, that have a S/N listed
in Table 5 of this AD and that have 22,985 CSN or more on the
effective date of this AD, remove the wheel from service within 15
CIS after the effective date of this AD.
    (4) Thereafter, for HPT stage 2 wheels, P[sol]N 23075345, that
have a S/N listed in Table 5 of this AD, remove the wheel from
service before exceeding the new, reduced ECLL of 23,000 CSN.

 Table 5--S/Ns of HPT Stage 2 Wheel, P/N 23075345, Eligible To Remain in
                        Service Until 23,000 CSN
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
MM507646           MM508205           MM508251          MM508322
MM508144           MM508208           MM508264          MM508337
MM508153           MM508211           MM508305          MM508338
MM508176           MM508221           MM508311          MM508382
MM508186           MM508241           MM508319          MM508387
MM508188           MM508248           MM508320
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (l) For wheels, P/N 23069438, in engines that have not complied
with RRC SB AE 3007A-72-176, Revision 5, dated September 2, 2008, or
SB AE 3007A-72-215, Revision 2, dated September 28, 2009, remove the
wheel before exceeding the new, reduced ECLL of 10,000 CSN.
    (m) For wheels, P/N 23069438, in engines that have complied with
RRC SB AE 3007A-72-176, Revision 5, dated September 2, 2008 or SB AE
3007A-72-215, Revision 2, dated September 28, 2009, do the
following:
    (1) For wheels that have 19,985 CSN or more on the effective
date of this AD, remove the wheel from service within 15 CIS after
the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Thereafter, remove the wheel from service before exceeding
the new, reduced ECLL of 20,000 CSN.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

    (n) The Manager, Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, has the
authority to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD
if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

Special Flight Permits

    (o) Under 14 CFR 39.23, we are limiting the special flight
permits for this AD by restricting the flight to essential flight
crew only.

Related Information

    (p) Contact Kyri Zaroyiannis, Aerospace Engineer, Chicago
Aircraft Certification Office, Small Airplane Directorate, FAA, 2300
E. Devon Ave., Des Plaines, IL 60018; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (847) 294-
7834, for more information about this AD.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on February 11, 2010.
Francis A. Favara,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-3145 Filed 2-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 128 (Thursday, July 2, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 39922]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14311]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

[Docket ID FEMA-2014-0022]

Technical Mapping Advisory Council; Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Committee Management; Notice of Federal Advisory Committee
Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Technical
Mapping Advisory Council (TMAC) will hold a virtual meeting on Monday
July 27th, 2020 and Tuesday July 28th, 2020. The meeting will be open
to the public via a Zoom Video Communications link and conference line.

DATES: The TMAC will meet on Monday July 27th, 2020 and Tuesday July
28th, 2020 from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET). Please note
that the meeting will close early if the TMAC has completed its
business.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held virtually using Zoom Video
Communications, Meeting Identification (ID)<PHONE_NUMBER>4 (https://fema.zoomgov.com/j/16195624614) to share meeting visuals and audio.
Members of the public who wish to attend the virtual meeting must
register in advance by sending an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(Attention: Michael Nakagaki) by 5:00 p.m. ET on Friday July 24th,
2020. For information on services for individuals with disabilities or
to request special assistance at the meeting, contact the person listed
below as soon as possible.
    To facilitate public participation, members of the public are
invited to provide written comments on the issues to be considered by
the TMAC, as listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below.
Associated meeting materials will be available at www.fema.gov/TMAC for
review by Friday July 24th, 2020. Written comments to be considered by
the committee at the time of the meeting must be submitted and received
by Friday July 24th, 2020, identified by Docket ID FEMA-2014-0022, and
submitted by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Email: Address the email TO<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and
CC<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Include the docket number in the subject
line of the message. Include name and contact information in the body
of the email.
     Mail: Regulatory Affairs Division, Office of Chief
Counsel, FEMA, 500 C Street SW, Room 8NE, Washington, DC 20472-3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the words
``Federal Emergency Management Agency'' and the docket number for this
action. Comments received will be posted without alteration at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
    Docket: For docket access to read background documents or comments
received by the TMAC, go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for
the Docket ID FEMA-2014-0022.
    A public comment period will be held on Monday July 27th, 2020 from
12:00 p.m. to 12:30 p.m. ET and Tuesday July 28th, 2020 from 12:00 p.m.
to 12:30 p.m. ET. Speakers have been asked to provide comment on topics
related to the 2020 Tasking Memo that was presented to the TMAC by
FEMA. In 2020 FEMA has tasked the TMAC to work with stakeholders to
identify best practices that can be incorporated into a future flood
hazard and flood risk identification program and to provide a framework
for FEMA to transition to the envisioned flood hazard and flood risk
identification program. Speakers are requested to limit their comments
to no more than three minutes. The public comment period will not
exceed 30 minutes. Please note that the public comment period may end
before the time indicated, following the last call for comments.
Contact the individual listed below to register as a speaker by close
of business on Friday July 24th, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Nakagaki, Designated Federal
Officer for the TMAC, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20024,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, and email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The
TMAC website is: http://www.fema.gov/TMAC.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is given under the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.
    In accordance with the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of
2012, the TMAC makes recommendations to the FEMA Administrator on: (1)
How to improve, in a cost-effective manner, the (a) accuracy, general
quality, ease of use, and distribution and dissemination of flood
insurance rate maps and risk data; and (b) performance metrics and
milestones required to effectively and efficiently map flood risk areas
in the United States; (2) mapping standards and guidelines for (a)
flood insurance rate maps, and (b) data accuracy, data quality, data
currency, and data eligibility; (3) how to maintain, on an ongoing
basis, flood insurance rate maps and flood risk identification; (4)
procedures for delegating mapping activities to State and local mapping
partners; and (5) (a) methods for improving interagency and
intergovernmental coordination on flood mapping and flood risk
determination, and (b) a funding strategy to leverage and coordinate
budgets and expenditures across Federal agencies. Furthermore, the TMAC
is required to submit an annual report to the FEMA Administrator that
contains: (1) A description of the activities of the Council; (2) an
evaluation of the status and performance of flood insurance rate maps
and mapping activities to revise and update Flood Insurance Rate Maps;
and (3) a summary of recommendations made by the Council to the FEMA
Administrator.
    Agenda: The purpose of this meeting is for the TMAC members to
provide briefings on the work of the TMAC subcommittees, review written
sections of the report, discuss and vote on a proposed vision statement
for the mapping program, and receive presentations from subject matter
experts. Any related materials will be posted to the FEMA TMAC site
prior to the meeting to provide the public an opportunity to review the
materials. The full agenda and related meeting materials will be posted
for review by Friday July 24th, 2020 at http://www.fema.gov/TMAC.

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-14311 Filed 7-1-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25511-25512]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09293]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4644-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

Virginia; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the Commonwealth of Virginia (FEMA-4644-DR), dated March
11, 2022, and related determinations.

DATES: The declaration was issued March 11, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated March 11, 2022, the President issued a major disaster declaration
under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the
Commonwealth of Virginia resulting from a severe winter storm and
snowstorm during the period of January 2 to January 3, 2022, is of
sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a major disaster
declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''). Therefore, I declare that such a major disaster exists in
the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Public Assistance in the
designated areas and Hazard Mitigation throughout the Commonwealth.
You are further authorized to provide snow assistance under the
Public Assistance program for a limited period of time during or
proximate to the incident period. Consistent with the requirement
that Federal assistance be supplemental, any Federal funds provided
under the Stafford Act for Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation
will be limited to 75 percent of the total eligible costs.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that

pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive
Order 12148, as amended, Gerard M. Stolar, of FEMA is appointed to act
as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major disaster.
    The following areas of the Commonwealth of Virginia have been
designated as adversely affected by this major disaster:

    Albemarle, Amelia, Appomattox, Bedford, Buckingham, Caroline,
Charlotte, Culpeper, Cumberland, Essex, Fauquier, Fluvanna,
Goochland, Greene, Hanover, King George, King William, Louisa,
Madison, Nelson, Orange, Powhatan, Prince Edward, Rappahannock,
Spotsylvania, Stafford, and Westmoreland Counties and the
independent city of Fredericksburg for Public Assistance.
    King George and Stafford Counties for snow assistance under the
Public Assistance program for any continuous 48-hour period during
or proximate to the incident period.
    All areas within the Commonwealth of Virginia are eligible for
assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-09293 Filed 4-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P