U.S. Department of Homeland Security

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
Office of Chief Counsel

                            REGULATORY EVALUATION,
                         RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION, AND
                       REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ASSESSMENT
                                      FOR
                         NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING
         CHANGE IN SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR STATE MITIGATION PLANS
OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
                          REGULATORY AFFAIRS DIVISION
                                  August 2012

Change in Submission Requirements for State Mitigation Plans  -  Regulatory Evaluation
Introduction
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)'s statutory authority for mitigation planning is found in section 322 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended (Stafford Act).  The Stafford Act also provides statutory authority for FEMA to promulgate rules and regulations.  Under this authority and in concert with Executive Order 13563 retrospective review requirements, FEMA is proposing the Change in Submission Requirements for State Mitigation Plans Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM).  The proposed rule would reduce the frequency of Standard State Mitigation Plan (Standard Plan)  and Enhanced State Mitigation Plan (Enhanced Plan) updates by extending the update requirement from 3 to 5 years.  The proposed rule would also align the State Mitigation Plan update requirements, with the Tribal and Local Mitigation Plan update requirements; reduce the burden placed on State governments; allow additional time between updates for implementation of mitigation plans; as well as respond to stakeholders' request for an extension of the State Mitigation Plan update cycle.
The following regulatory evaluation presents an economic analysis, including costs and benefits of the Change in Submission Requirements for State Mitigation Plans NPRM.  It is a supplementary analysis to the NPRM, consistent with Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review.  The evaluation first identifies the proposed changes and impacted population.  It then outlines the cost and cost savings associated with extending the State Mitigation Plan update frequency from 3 to 5 years.  Next, it evaluates the benefits associated with the proposed rule, followed by a comparison of costs and benefits as well as a summation of results.  The evaluation then compares the identified costs and benefits and summarizes the results.  Finally, the evaluation provides a discussion on the alternatives considered, different State Mitigation Plan cost estimates used in this evaluation and the Hazard Mitigation Planning and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Final Rule, which published in the October 31, 2007 Federal Register, as well as an examination into the proposed rule's impact on small entities.
Regulatory Impacts
Proposed Changes
Currently, States are required to submit Standard or Enhanced Plan updates, at a minimum, every 3 years as a condition of receiving non-emergency Stafford Act assistance and FEMA mitigation grants.   However, under the proposed rule, States would be required to submit Standard or Enhanced Plan updates, at a minimum, every 5 years.
Impacted Population
The proposed rule would affect "States", as defined by the Stafford Act, that choose to submit updated Standard or Enhanced Plans to FEMA for approval.    At the time of this analysis, 56 States have approved mitigation plans.  FEMA anticipates that all 56 States would continue to maintain and update their plans for the duration of this analysis.  In addition, at the time of this analysis, 9 of the State Mitigation Plans are Enhanced Plans, 1 State Mitigation Plan is pending Enhanced Plan status, and 46 are Standard Plans.  FEMA maintains a breakdown of 10 Enhanced Plans (18 percent) and 46 Standard Plans (82 percent) for the duration of the analysis.
In addition to the States identified above, Indian Tribal Governments may choose to submit plans that meet the Enhanced State Mitigation Plan criteria identified in 44 C.F.R. § 201.5 (2011), which includes a 3 year update cycle.  However, to date, no Tribes have submitted Tribal Mitigation Plans meeting the criteria identified in 44 C.F.R. § 201.5 (2011).  Therefore, for the purposes of this analysis, FEMA assumes that Tribal Mitigation Plans would continue to follow the update cycle identified in 44 C.F.R. § 201.7(d)(3) (2011) and not be impacted by the proposed rule.
Cost and Cost Savings
This section begins by discussing the proposed mitigation plan update schedule compared to the existing update schedule over a 15 year period.  It then calculates a State Mitigation Plan Update Unit Cost, which is used to estimate State 15 year cost savings.  Lastly, Federal costs and cost savings are then estimated as well as the total cost savings of the proposed rule.
Update Schedule
As stated previously, States currently submit Standard or Enhanced Plan updates, at a minimum, every 3 years.  However, under the proposed rule, States would submit mitigation plan updates, at a minimum, every 5 years.  This results in a reduction of 2 plan submissions over a 15 year period per State.  Cumulatively, as shown in Table 1, this results in a reduction of 112 plan updates over 15 years.
Table 1:  15 Year Cumulative State Plan Update Schedule (5 Year Cycle)
                                     Year
                  Baseline
# of Plan Updates
(3 year cycle)
               Proposed Rule
# of Plan Updates
(5 year cycle)

                                       1
                                      56
                                      56

                                       2
                                       0
                                       0

                                       3
                                       0
                                       0

                                       4
                                      56
                                       0

                                       5
                                       0
                                       0

                                       6
                                       0
                                      56

                                       7
                                      56
                                       0

                                       8
                                       0
                                       0

                                       9
                                       0
                                       0

                                      10
                                      56
                                       0

                                      11
                                       0
                                      56

                                      12
                                       0
                                       0

                                      13
                                      56
                                       0

                                      14
                                       0
                                       0

                                      15
                                       0
                                       0
Difference (-)
Total
                                      280
                                      168
                                      112
# of Standard Plans
                                      230
                                      138
                                      92
# of Enhanced Plans
                                      50
                                      30
                                      20

Mitigation Plan Unit Costs
The cost to update a State's Mitigation Plan is unique to that respective State.  However, for the purposes of this analysis, FEMA uses an average Mitigation Plan Update Unit Cost for Standard and Enhanced Plans to estimate the total cost savings of the proposed rule.
Although, not all States have submitted mitigation plan related grant applications, FEMA uses historical mitigation plan grant data to estimate a Standard Plan update and Enhanced Plan update average cost.  Many of such plans include additional improvements beyond a simple mitigation plan update (i.e. development of web portals).  Although such plan improvements are valuable and encouraged; for the purposes of this analysis, FEMA, where possible, adjusted project award request amounts by separating out those costs not directly related to mitigation plan updates.  Based on these adjusted values, FEMA estimates a Standard Plan update unit cost of $205,000 and an Enhanced Plan update unit cost of $524,000.  As part of the analysis, FEMA also includes a possible Low Plan Update Unit Cost by decreasing the Standard and Enhanced Plan update unit cost by 50 percent and a High Plan Update Unit cost by increasing the Standard and Enhanced Plan update unit costs by 50 percent.  FEMA requests comments on these estimated plan update unit costs.
Table 2:  State Mitigation Plan Update Unit Costs
State Plan Type
                       Low Plan Update Unit Cost
(-50%)
                       Mitigation Plan Update Unit Cost
                      High Plan Update Unit Cost
(+50%)
Standard Plan Update
                                   $102,500
                                   $205,000
                                   $307,500
Enhanced Plan Update
                                   $262,000
                                   $524,000
                                   $786,000

State Cost Savings
Analogous to the cost to update a State's Mitigation Plan being unique, so too are the cost savings associated with the reduction in the number of updates.  To calculate cost savings over 15 years, FEMA first separates the 112 reduction in updates between Standard and Enhanced Plans.  As discussed previously, FEMA assumes it would receive 46 Standard Plan updates and 10 Enhanced Plan updates, at the end of each update cycle, for the duration of the analysis.  Applying this distribution to the 112 reduction in plans results in a reduction of 92 Standard Plan updates and 20 Enhanced Plan updates over 15 years.  Next, as presented in Table 3, FEMA multiplies the reduction in updates by each plan update unit cost for an undiscounted total cost savings, over 15 years, of approximately $29,300,000.  Using the same methodology, the resulting low and high State cost savings estimates are approximately $14,700,000 and $44,000,000, respectively.   For discounted figures over a 15-year time period at discount rates of 7 percent and 3 percent, refer to Appendix A.
Table 3:  State Cost Savings Over 15 Years
State Plan Type
                         Reduction in Plan Updates[1]
                             Plan Update Unit Cost
                              State Cost Savings

                                    (-50%)
                                    Primary
                                    (+50%)
                                      Low
                                    Primary
                                     High
Standard Plan Update
                                      92
                                   $102,500
                                   $205,000
                                   $307,500
                                  $9,430,000
                                  $18,860,000
                                  $28,290,000
Enhanced Plan Update
                                      20
                                   $262,000
                                   $524,000
                                   $786,000
                                  $5,240,000
                                  $10,480,000
                                  $15,720,000
Total
                                      112

                                  $14,670,000
                                  $29,340,000
                                  $44,010,000
1- Reduction in Plan Updates is the decrease in updates per State multiplied by the total number of Standard or Enhanced Plans.

Federal Cost and Cost Savings
The Federal Government, specifically FEMA, would also be impacted by the proposed rule.  State Mitigation Plans can be large documents covering many different areas, types of hazards, and aspects of mitigation planning and implementation.  One cost associated with the reduction in plan updates is a diminished opportunity for FEMA to review mitigation plans that reflect the most current changes in State development, progress in mitigation efforts, and/or priorities.  On-the-other-hand, FEMA would receive a level of cost savings due to the decreased number of plans it would review.
FEMA's review of State Mitigation Plans can be a lengthy process which includes a 16 page Standard State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review Crosswalk, plus an additional 6 page crosswalk for Enhanced Plans.  The reduction in the number of plans FEMA reviews corresponds with the reduction in the number of State Mitigation Plan updates submitted to FEMA.  To estimate the accompanying cost savings, FEMA calculates a low, primary, and high Federal Review Unit Cost, which is then multiplied by the reduction in plan updates.
FEMA subject matter experts, who work with mitigation plans, estimate that it would take, on average, between 80 to 200 hours, with a primary estimate of 120 hours, for a federal reviewer to review either a Standard Plan or Enhanced Plan update.  To estimate the low, primary, and high Federal Review Unit Cost, FEMA multiplies the hours per federal plan review by a federal reviewer fully loaded wage rate of $48.08 per hour.  The resulting Federal Review Unit Cost ranges from $3,846 to $9,616 with a primary estimate of $5,770 per update, as seen in Table 4.
Table 4:  Federal Review Unit Costs
                        Federal Review of Plans (hours)
                             Federal Reviewer Wage
                           Federal Review Unit Cost
                                      Low
                                    Primary
                                     High

                                      Low
                                    Primary
                                     High
                                      80
                                      120
                                      200
                                    $48.08
                                    $3,846
                                    $5,770
                                    $9,616

To calculate the amount of Federal Cost savings over 15 years, as shown in Table 5, FEMA multiplies the Reduction in Plan Updates (112) by the low, primary, and high Federal Review Unit Cost.  The resulting cost savings ranges from approximately $431,000 to $1,077,000 with a primary estimate of approximately $646,000.
Table 5:  Federal Cost Savings Over 15 Years
Reduction in Plan Updates[1]
                           Federal Review Unit Cost
                             Federal Cost Savings

                                      Low
                                    Primary
                                     High
                                      Low
                                    Primary
                                     High
                                      112
                                    $3,846
                                    $5,770
                                    $9,616
                                   $430,752
                                   $646,240
                                  $1,076,992
1- Reduction in Plan Updates is the decrease in updates per State multiplied by the total number of Standard or Enhanced Plans.

Total Mitigation Plan Update Costs Savings
The proposed rule's predominate impact is a decrease in existing burden or cost savings.  Based on the preceding calculations, the proposed rule's total cost savings, over 15 years, is approximately $30,000,000, as shown in Table 6.
Table 6:  Total Cost Savings Over 15 Years
                              State Cost Savings
                             Federal Cost Savings
                              Total Cost Savings
                                      Low
                                    Primary
                                     High
                                      Low
                                    Primary
                                     High
                                      Low
                                    Primary
                                     High
                                  $14,670,000
                                  $29,340,000
                                  $44,010,000
                                   $430,752
                                   $646,240
                                  $1,076,992
                                  $15,100,752
                                  $29,986,240
                                  $45,086,992

Transfer Cost Savings
FEMA has established a number of grant programs that States may use to help defray the cost of updating their mitigation plans.  However, grant awards are not guaranteed and may be subject to high variability based on available funding.  In addition, the proposed rule does not directly impact a State's choice to apply for update assistance grants, and some States do not apply for grant funding to assist with plan updates.  Nonetheless, FEMA uses historical grant data to estimate that 43 percent of States would likely receive grant funds to update their Standard Plans and 13 percent would likely receive grant funds to update their Enhanced Plans.   To estimate the reduction in Federal transfers, as shown in Table 7, FEMA multiplies the percentage of States that are historically awarded grants by the typical Federal share of project requests (75 percent) by the 15 year State Cost Savings from Table 3.
Table 7:  15 Year Reduction in Federal Transfers
State Plan Type
                              State Cost Savings
                               % Awarded Grants
                             Typical Federal Share
                       Reduction in Federal Transfers[1]

                                      Low
                                    Primary
                                     High

                                      Low
                                    Primary
                                     High
Standard Plan Update
                                  $9,430,000
                                  $18,860,000
                                  $28,290,000
                                      43%
                                      75%
                                  $3,041,175
                                  $6,082,350
                                  $9,123,525
Enhanced Plan Update
                                  $5,240,000
                                  $10,480,000
                                  $15,720,000
                                      13%
                                      75%
                                   $510,900
                                  $1,021,800
                                  $1,532,700
Total
                                  $14,670,000
                                  $29,340,000
                                  $44,010,000

                                  $3,552,075
                                  $7,104,150
                                  $10,656,225
1- Reduction in Federal Transfers = (Percent Awarded Grants x Typical Federal Share) x 15 Year State Cost Savings.
The resulting estimated impact on Federal transfers is approximately $7,100,000 over 15 years.
Benefits
There are numerous benefits of the proposed rule.  First, the proposed reduction in update frequency would reduce the regulatory burden on States and provide greater flexibility.  Second, aligning the State Mitigation Plan update cycle with Local and Tribal Mitigation Plan update cycles may foster closer coordination of mitigation planning and implementation efforts.   For instance, States could spend more time coordinating  local planning efforts and providing technical assistance.  Third, the proposed rule would provide a cost savings for those submitting Standard or Enhanced Plan updates, as well as to the Federal Government as described in the Cost and Cost Savings section.  These cost savings could then be shifted to other mitigation activities that increase resilience and reduction of the Nation's risk to natural hazards.  For instance, States may be able to implement additional mitigation actions identified in their respective plans or continue to build partnerships and capacity through increased delivery of training and technical assistance to support Local and Tribal Mitigation Plan development, update, and implementation.
Comparison of Cost and Benefits
The proposed rule would reduce the frequency of Standard and Enhanced Plans by extending the update requirement from a minimum of 3 years to a minimum of 5 years.  This would reduce the number of required plans per State over 15 years by two.  FEMA estimates this would result in a State Cost Savings of approximately $29,300,000.  The proposed rule would also impact the Federal Government by reducing FEMA's opportunity to evaluate any changes to a State's mitigation plan via a plan review.  However, the reduction in plan update frequency would also result in an estimated Federal Cost Savings of approximately $646,000 due to a reduction in the number of mitigation plans reviewed.  Thus, as shown in Table 6, FEMA estimates the proposed rule's total quantified net savings to society as $30,000,000.  Discounted at 7 percent, the total quantified savings to society is approximately $18,800,000 as seen in Appendix A (Table 13).
In addition to the cost savings identified above, benefits of the proposed rule include greater flexibility for States to update their mitigation plans, as well as an alignment with the Local and Tribal Mitigation Plan update cycle.  Furthermore, the reduced opportunity for FEMA to evaluate State changes to their mitigation plans could likely be addressed via alternate means; for instance, through existing stakeholder relationships, at little to no additional cost.
Based on the above analysis, FEMA has determined that this is not an economically significant rulemaking within the definition of Executive Order 12866, as annual costs or benefits to all parties do not surpass the $100 million threshold in any year.  Furthermore, given these findings, FEMA supports the proposed change in the frequency of the update requirement based on the approximate $30.0 million savings to society over 15 years.
Alternatives
Alternative 1  -  No Action
Under the no action alternative, no regulatory changes would occur and States would continue to submit State Mitigation Plan updates every 3 years.  There are no incremental cost changes associated with this alternative.  However, this alternative would not address stakeholder concerns about the burdens placed on State governments.
Alternative 2  -  Annual Mitigation Plan Updates
As an alternative to the proposed rule, FEMA considered requiring mitigation plan updates annually.  As discussed previously, States currently submit State Mitigation Plan updates at least every 3 years.  However, under this alternative, States would submit their plans every year.  This would increase the number of plan updates per State by 10 over 15 years.  Cumulatively, as shown in Table 8, this results in an increase of 560 plan updates.
Table 8:  15 Year Cumulative State Plan Update Schedule (Annual Plan Updates)
                                     Year
                      # of Plan Updates
(3 year updates)
                      # of Plan Updates
(1 year updates)

                                       1
                                      56
                                      56

                                       2
                                       0
                                      56

                                       3
                                       0
                                      56

                                       4
                                      56
                                      56

                                       5
                                       0
                                      56

                                       6
                                       0
                                      56

                                       7
                                      56
                                      56

                                       8
                                       0
                                      56

                                       9
                                       0
                                      56

                                      10
                                      56
                                      56

                                      11
                                       0
                                      56

                                      12
                                       0
                                      56

                                      13
                                      56
                                      56

                                      14
                                       0
                                      56

                                      15
                                       0
                                      56
Difference (+)
Total # of Plan
                                      280
                                      840
                                      560
# of Standard Plans
                                      230
                                      690
                                      460
# of Enhanced Plans
                                      50
                                      150
                                      100

Using the same methodology applied in the Cost and Cost Savings section above, FEMA estimates that States would submit an additional 460 Standard Plan updates and 100 Enhanced Plan updates at a unit cost of $205,000 per Standard Plan and $524,000 per Enhanced Plan.  The total State Cost Increase, over 15 years, would be $146,700,000.  FEMA would also experience a corresponding increase in the number of mitigation plans it would review.  Using the primary Federal Review Unit Cost estimate of $5,770 calculated in the Cost and Cost Savings section, the resulting Federal cost increase is $3,231,200.   The Total Cost Increase over 15 years of this alternative is approximately $149,900,000 as shown in Table 9.
Table 9:  Total Cost Increase Over 15 Years (Annual Plan Updates)
State Plan Type
                             Change in Updates[1]
                              State Cost Increase
                             Federal Cost Increase
                              Total Cost Increase
Standard Plan Update
                                      460
                                  $94,300,000
                                  $2,654,200
                                  $96,954,200
Enhanced Plan Update
                                      100
                                  $52,400,000
                                   $577,000
                                  $52,977,000
Total
                                      560
                                 $146,700,000
                                  $3,231,200
                                 $149,931,200
1- Change in Updates is the change in State updates multiplied by the number of plans.

This alternative would provide timely information on the most current changes in State development, progress in mitigation efforts, and/or priorities.  However, this alternative would increase the cost of mitigation planning by approximately $149,900,000 over 15 years.  In addition, this alternative would provide limited time to advance mitigation efforts identified in each State's respective plan.  Therefore, so as not to impose additional costs on States, FEMA has chosen not to pursue this alternative.
Alternative 3  -  5 Year Update with Annual Status Reporting Requirement
Another alternative to the proposed rule FEMA considered was to change the State Mitigation Plan update requirement from 3 to 5 years, similar to the proposed option, but also add an annual reporting requirement.  Such reporting would not be as extensive as a plan update, but would provide FEMA useful information on each State's progress towards meeting its mitigation goals outlined in their respective plans.  FEMA assumes that much of the information used to develop a State's annual status report would already be captured as part of the State's ongoing mitigation plan update activities.  FEMA also assumes that the equivalent to an Urban and Regional Planner, at a loaded wage rate of $45.33, would prepare a State's report and estimates that its preparation would take approximately 8 hours.  FEMA also assumes a federal reviewer, as identified previously, would spend 2 hours reviewing each State's annual status report.  The total annual status reporting cost over 15 years, as show in Table 10, is approximately $386,000.
Table 10:  Annual Status Reporting Burden Over 15 Years
Entity
                               Hours per Report
                                Loaded Wage[1]
                              Report Unit Cost[2]
                       # of Reports[3]
(over 15 years)
                       Total Annual Status Report Costs
State
                                       8
                                    $45.33
                                     $363
                                      840
                                   $304,920
Federal
                                       2
                                    $48.08
                                      $96
                                      840
                                    $80,640
Total

                                   $385,560
1- FEMA assumes an Urban and Regional planner (SOC 19-3051) would prepare a State's annual report and that a GS 13 Step 1 Federal employee would review annual reports submitted by States.
2- Report Unit Cost is rounded to the nearest whole dollar.
3- # of Reports is calculated by multiplying the number of "States" with Enhanced Plan and Standard Plans by 15 years.

Since both the proposed option and this alternative would change mitigation plan update requirements from 3 to 5 years, the difference between them is simply the Total Annual Status Report Cost.  Relative to the baseline of 3 year updates, this alternative's cost savings is $29,600,680.  This is $385,560 less than the proposed option's total cost savings.  Therefore, despite an annual status reporting requirement potential to address FEMA's concerns about FEMA's diminished opportunity to review mitigation plans, FEMA has chosen not to pursue this alternative, so as to not place the burden associated with mandatory annual status reporting on States.
Retrospective Evaluation
In 72 Fed. Reg. 61,552 (Oct. 31, 2007), FEMA published the Hazard Mitigation Planning and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Final Rule (2007 Mitigation Planning Final Rule) whose supporting analysis included a number of assumptions related to Standard and Enhanced Mitigation Plans.  Some of those assumptions have simply been updated in this analysis, while others have dramatically changed.  The following is an overview of those changes.
Population
First, the 2007 Mitigation Planning Final Rule identified a total of 91 State Mitigation Plans subject to the 3 year update requirement, which included all 50 States, District of Columbia, 7 U.S. territories, and 33 Indian Tribal Governments.  However, per the Stafford Act's current definition of "State", only 5 U.S. territories are identified.  In addition, the Flood Mitigation Grants and Hazard Mitigation Planning Final Rule published September 16, 2009 finalized the addition of specific Tribal mitigation plan provisions under 44 C.F.R. § 201.7 (2011), separate from State and local provisions.  As a result, 56 "States" were identified as the impacted population and utilized in the above analysis.
Period of Analysis & Distribution of Updates
The 2007 Mitigation Planning Final Rule estimated that 31 State Mitigation Plans would be updated per year.  Under the NPRM's analysis, the update cycle is evaluated over 15 years and assumes that all plan updates occur in the same year.  The 2007 Mitigation Planning Final Rule also estimated 3 Enhanced Plan updates per year and assumed that 3 States per year would submit newly Enhanced Mitigation Plans as part of their update.  However, FEMA has not realized this level of transition from Standard to Enhanced Plans.  As such, the NPRM's analysis assumes a static value of 10 Enhanced Plan updates over the 15 years of the analysis, with the understanding that States may shift between Standard and Enhanced Plans.
Mitigation Plan Unit Cost
The 2007 Mitigation Planning Final Rule used the median hourly wage of $26.31 for Urban and Regional Planners, times 30 percent to account for benefits, for a fully loaded hourly wage of $34.20.  This wage rate was then multiplied by the number of hours it would take States to update their mitigation plans.  The 2007 Mitigation Planning Final Rule estimated that Standard and Enhanced Plan updates would take 320 hours to complete.  This resulted in a 2007 Mitigation Plan Update Unit Cost of $10,944.
However, the NPRM's analysis applies a different methodology to estimate a Standard and Enhanced Plan update unit cost.  FEMA uses historical mitigation plan grant data, adjusted, where possible, to subtract out costs not directly related to plan updates, to estimate a Standard Plan update and Enhanced Plan update average cost.  Based on these adjusted values, FEMA estimates a Standard Plan update unit cost of $205,000 and an Enhanced Plan update unit cost of $524,000.
Cost Comparison
The 2007 Mitigation Planning Final Rule estimated an annual economic impact of approximately $46,000,000 of which $339,264 was attributed to Standard Plan updates and $82,080 was attributed to Enhanced Plan updates and upgrades.  Subtracting out Standard to Enhanced Plan upgrades results in a total annual update cost of $404,928 and a 15 year cost of $6,073,920.
Applying the modifications identified above (population, period of analysis, distribution of updates, and mitigation plan unit cost) the 15 year baseline (3 year update cycle) State update cost is $73,350,000.  This $67,276,080 increase represents the change in mitigation plan update costs, over 15 years, resulting from the identified modifications.  The 15 year proposed (5 year update cycle) State update cost is $44,010,000.  This reduction ($29,340,000) is a result of the shift from a 3 year update cycle to a 5 year update cycle.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612), FEMA evaluated whether the proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.  The term "small entities" comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
As the proposed rule would not result in additional costs, FEMA does not anticipate the proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.  Furthermore, the proposed rule only impact States which are not considered small entities.  However, if any small entities were to be impacted, FEMA expects such entities would experience similar cost savings as those described in the Cost and Cost Savings section.  In addition, as the submission of mitigation plans and updates is voluntary, a small entity may choose not to submit a plan or update if it determines that such a submission is not, or no longer, cost effective, thereby eliminating any costs associated with plan or update submission.

Appendix A:  Analysis Using Discount Rates of 3 Percent and 7 Percent
For the purposes of analysis, FEMA assumes that all plan updates occur in the same year.  As stated previously, FEMA estimates 46 Standard Plan updates with a unit cost of $205,000 and 10 Enhanced Plan updates with a unit cost of $524,000 over the course of the analysis.  The resulting one year cost for plan updates is $14,670,000 (46 Standard Plan updates x $205,000 + 10 Enhanced Plan updates x $524,000).  FEMA also estimates a primary Federal unit cost of $5,770 to review such plan updates for a one year cost of $323,120 (56 plan updates x $5,770).  The resulting undiscounted cost in a given year when all plan updates are submitted is approximately $15,000,000 (14,670,000 +$323,120 =$14,993,120).
Table 11 shows the resulting undiscounted costs under the baseline 3 year review cycle as well as the proposed rule's 5 year cycle.  As seen in the table, the estimated 15 year undiscounted cost of plan updates every 3 years is approximately $75 million and the estimated 15 year undiscounted costs of plan updates every 5 years is approximately $45 million.  The resulting undiscounted cost savings of the proposed rule is approximately $30 million.
      Table 11:  Undiscounted Plan Update Costs Over 15 Years (in millions of dollars)
                                     Year
                           Baseline
(3 year cycle)
                         Proposed Rule
(5 year cycle)

                                     2013
                                     $15.0
                                     $15.0

                                     2014
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2015
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2016
                                     $15.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2017
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2018
                                     $0.0
                                     $15.0

                                     2019
                                     $15.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2020
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2021
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2022
                                     $15.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2023
                                     $0.0
                                     $15.0

                                     2024
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2025
                                     $15.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2026
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2027
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0
                                  Difference
Total
                                     $75.0
                                     $45.0
                                     $30.0

FEMA also calculated 15 year costs discounted at 3 percent and 7 percent.  As seen in Table 12, the estimated 15 year cost of plan updates every 3 years discounted at 3 percent is approximately $63.2 million.  The estimated 15 year cost of plan updates every 5 years discounted at 3 percent is approximately $39.1 million.  The resulting cost savings of the proposed rule discounted at 3 percent is approximately $24.1 million.

      Table 12:  Plan Update Costs Discounted at 3 Percent Over 15 Years (in millions of dollars)
                                     Year
                             Discount Factor (3%)
                           Baseline*
(3 year cycle)
                        Proposed Rule*
(5 year cycle)

                                     2013
                                       1
                                     $15.0
                                     $15.0

                                     2014
                                     0.971
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2015
                                     0.943
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2016
                                     0.915
                                     $13.7
                                     $0.0

                                     2017
                                     0.888
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2018
                                     0.863
                                     $0.0
                                     $12.9

                                     2019
                                     0.837
                                     $12.5
                                     $0.0

                                     2020
                                     0.813
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2021
                                     0.789
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2022
                                     0.766
                                     $11.5
                                     $0.0

                                     2023
                                     0.744
                                     $0.0
                                     $11.2

                                     2024
                                     0.722
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2025
                                     0.701
                                     $10.5
                                     $0.0

                                     2026
                                     0.681
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2027
                                     0.661
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0
                                  Difference
Total

                                     $63.2
                                     $39.1
                                     $24.1
*- Discount values were calculated by multiplying one year Mitigation Plan Update cost savings $14,993,120 by associated discount factor.

Table 13 shows 15 year costs discounted at 7 percent.  The estimated 15 year cost of plan updates every 3 years discounted at 7 percent is approximately $52.1 million.  The estimated 15 year cost of plan updates every 5 years discounted at 7 percent is approximately $33.3 million.  The resulting cost savings of the proposed rule discounted at 3 percent is approximately $18.8 million.
      Table 13:  Plan Update Costs Discounted at 7 Percent Over 15 Years (in millions of dollars)
                                     Year
                             Discount Factor (7%)
                           Baseline*
(3 year cycle)
                        Proposed Rule*
(5 year cycle)

                                     2013
                                       1
                                     $15.0
                                     $15.0

                                     2014
                                     0.935
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2015
                                     0.873
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2016
                                     0.816
                                     $12.2
                                     $0.0

                                     2017
                                     0.763
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2018
                                     0.713
                                     $0.0
                                     $10.7

                                     2019
                                     0.666
                                     $10.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2020
                                     0.623
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2021
                                     0.582
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2022
                                     0.544
                                     $8.2
                                     $0.0

                                     2023
                                     0.508
                                     $0.0
                                     $7.6

                                     2024
                                     0.475
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2025
                                     0.444
                                     $6.7
                                     $0.0

                                     2026
                                     0.415
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0

                                     2027
                                     0.388
                                     $0.0
                                     $0.0
                                  Difference
Total

                                     $52.1
                                     $33.3
                                     $18.8
*- Discount values were calculated by multiplying one year Mitigation Plan Update cost savings $14,993,120 by associated discount factor.


[Federal Register: September 13, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 176)]
[Notices]
[Page 55630-55631]
[DOCID:fr13se10-102]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2010-0208]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Extension of Currently
Approved Collection: Transportation of Hazardous Materials, Highway
Routing

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FMCSA
announces its plan to submit the Information Collection Request (ICR)
described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for its
review and approval and invites public comment. The FMCSA requests
approval to extend an existing ICR titled, ``Transportation of
Hazardous Materials, Highway Routing.'' The information reported by
States and Indian tribes is necessary to identify designated/restricted
routes and restrictions or limitations affecting how motor carriers may
transport certain hazardous materials on their highways, including
dates that such routes were established and information on subsequent
changes or new hazardous materials routing designations.

DATES: We must receive your comments on or before November 12, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments bearing the Department of
Transportation (DOT) Docket Management System (DMS) Docket Number
FMCSA-2010-0208 using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington DC 20590-0001 between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.

Each submission must include the Agency name and the docket number for
this Notice. Note that DOT posts all comments received without change
to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
included in a comment. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington DC, 20590-0001 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The DMS is available 24 hours each
day, 365 days each year. If you want acknowledgement that we received
your comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope or
post card or print the acknowledgement page that appears after
submitting them on-line.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or of the person signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement for the Federal
Docket Management System published in the Federal Register on January
17, 2008 (73 FR 3316), or you may visit http://edocket.access.gpo..gov/
2008/pdf/E8-785.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Paul Bomgardner, Hazardous
Materials Division, Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, West Building 6th Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The data for the Transportation
of Hazardous Materials; Highway Routing ICR is collected under
authority of 49 U.S.C. 5112 and 5125. Specifically, 49 U.S.C. 5112(c)
requires that the Secretary, in coordination with the States, ``shall
update and publish periodically a list of currently effective hazardous
material highway route designations.''
    Under 49 CFR 397.73, the FMCSA Administrator has the authority to
request that each State and Indian tribe, through its routing agency,
provide information identifying hazardous materials routing
designations within their jurisdictions. That information is collected
and consolidated by FMCSA and published annually, in whole or as
updates, in the Federal Register.
    Title: Transportation of Hazardous Materials, Highway Routing.
    OMB Control Number: 2126-0014.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently-approved information
collection.
    Respondents: The reporting burden is shared by 50 States, the
District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and the U.S. Virgin
Islands.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 13 hours [51 annual
respondents x 1 response x 15 minutes per response/60 minutes per
response = 12.75 hours, rounded to 13 hours].
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including: (1) Whether the proposed
collection is necessary for the performance of FMCSA's functions; (2)
the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways for the FMCSA to enhance
the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the collected information; and
(4) ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the
quality of the collected information. The Agency will summarize or
include your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this
information collection.

    Issued on: September 7, 2010.
Terry Shelton,
Office Director for Research and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2010-22734 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 210 (Wednesday, November 1, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50649-50650]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23817]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0214; FRL-9968-69]

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel; Notice of Public Meeting for the
Clarification of Charge Questions on Alternate High-Throughput Screens
To Determine Endocrine Disruption

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: There will be a three-hour meeting of the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, Scientific Advisory Panel (FIFRA SAP)
to review and consider the scope and clarity of the draft charge
questions for the November 28-30, 2017 SAP Meeting on the Continuing
Development of Alternative High-Throughput Screens to Determine
Endocrine Disruption, Focusing on Androgen Receptor, Steroidogenesis,
and Thyroid Pathways.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, November 6, 2017 from
approximately 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. (EST). This is an open public meeting
that will be conducted via webcast using Adobe Connect and telephone.
Registration is required to attend this meeting. Please visit: http://www.epa.gov/sap to register.
    Comments. Written comments on the scope and clarity of the draft
charge questions should be submitted by noon on Wednesday, November 1,
2017. FIFRA SAP may not be able to fully consider written comments
submitted after noon on Wednesday, November 1, 2017. Requests to make
oral comments at the meeting should be submitted on or before noon on
Wednesday, November 1, 2017 by registering at http://www.epa.gov/sap.
For additional instructions, see Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION or contact the Designated Federal Official (DFO) listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    Webcast. This meeting will be webcast only. Please refer to the
FIFRA SAP Web site at http://www.epa.gov/sap for information on how to
access the webcast.
    Special accommodations. For information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities, and to request accommodation of a
disability, please contact the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT at least 10 days prior to the meeting to allow EPA time to
process your request.

ADDRESSES:
    Meeting: This meeting will be webcast only. Please refer to the
following Web site to register and for information on how to access the
webcast: http://www.epa.gov/sap.
    Comments. Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0214, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Requests for special accommodations. Submit requests for special
accommodations to the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Todd Peterson, DFO, Office of
Science Coordination and Policy (7201M), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. This action may,
however, be of interest to persons who are or may be required to
conduct testing of chemical substances under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) and FIFRA. Since other entities may also be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. If your comments contain any information that
you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected, please contact the DFO
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT to obtain special
instructions before submitting your comments.

    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.

C. How may I participate in this meeting?

    You may participate in this meeting by following the instructions
in this unit. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, it is imperative that
you identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0214 in the subject line
on the first page of your request.
    1. Written comments. Written comments should be submitted, using
the instructions in ADDRESSES and Unit I.B., on or before noon on
Wednesday, November 1, 2017, to provide FIFRA SAP the time necessary to
consider and review the written comments. FIFRA SAP may not be able to
fully consider written comments submitted after noon on Wednesday,
November 1, 2017.
    2. Oral comments. Registration is required to attend this meeting.
Please visit: http://www.epag.gov/sap to register. Each individual or
group wishing to make brief oral comments to FIFRA SAP may submit their
request by registering on or before noon Wednesday, November 1, 2017.
Oral comments before FIFRA SAP are limited to approximately 5 minutes
due to the time constraints of this webcast.

II. Background

A. Purpose of FIFRA SAP Virtual Meeting on Charge Questions on
Alternate High-Throughput Screens To Determine Endocrine Disruption

    FIFRA SAP serves as the primary scientific peer review mechanism of
EPA's Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) and is
structured to provide scientific advice, information and
recommendations to the EPA Administrator on pesticides and pesticide-
related issues as to the impact of regulatory actions on health and the
environment. FIFRA SAP is a Federal advisory committee established in
1975 pursuant to FIFRA and operates in accordance with requirements of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix). FIFRA SAP is
composed of a permanent panel consisting of seven members who are
appointed by the EPA Administrator from nominees provided by the
National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation. The
FIFRA SAP is assisted in their reviews by ad hoc participation from the
Science Review Board (SRB). As a scientific peer review mechanism,
FIFRA SAP provides comments, evaluations, and recommendations to
improve the effectiveness and quality of analyses made by Agency
scientists. The FIFRA SAP strives to reach consensus; however, is not
required to reach consensus in its recommendations to the Agency.

B. Public Meeting

    During the meeting scheduled for Monday, November 6, 2017, the
FIFRA SAP will review and consider the Charge Questions for the Panel's
November 28-30, 2017 meeting on the Continuing Development of
Alternative High-Throughput Screens to Determine Endocrine Disruption,
Focusing on Androgen Receptor, Steroidogenesis, and Thyroid Pathways.
The SAP will receive a short background briefing including the EPA's
history and current position on the use of alternative high-throughput
screens. In addition, the panel members will have the opportunity to
comment on the scope and clarity of the draft charge questions.
Subsequent to this meeting, final charge questions will be provided for
the FIFRA SAP's deliberation on the white papers and supplemental
information during the in-person meeting to be held on November 28-30,
2017.

C. FIFRA SAP Documents and Meeting Minutes

    EPA's background documents and charge questions to the FIFRA SAP
are in the docket (identification number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0214). The
Agenda for the virtual meeting will be posted at: www.epa.gov/sap/virtual-meeting-clarify-draft-charge-questions-high-throughput-screens-determine-endocrine. In addition, the Agency may provide additional
background documents as additional materials become available. You may
obtain electronic copies of most meeting documents, including FIFRA SAP
composition (i.e., members and ad hoc members for this meeting) and the
meeting agenda, at http://www.regulations.gov and the FIFRA SAP Web
site at http://www.epa.gov/sap.
    FIFRA SAP will prepare meeting minutes approximately 90 calendar
days after the in-person meeting. The meeting minutes will be posted on
the FIFRA SAP Web site: http://www.epa.gov/sap and may be accessed in
the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 136 et. seq.; 21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.

    Dated: October 11, 2017.
Inza Graves,
Deputy Director, Office of Science Coordination and Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-23817 Filed 10-31-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: November 17, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 220)]
[Notices]
[Page 59172]
[DOCID:fr17no09-54]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0430; FRL-8977-8]

Final Notice of Data Availability Concerning Compliance
Supplement Pool Allowance Allocations Under the Clean Air Interstate
Rule Federal Implementation Plan.

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of data availability (NODA).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is administering--under the Clean Air Interstate Rule
(CAIR) Federal Implementation Plans (FIPs)--the CAIR NOX
Annual Trading Program Compliance Supplement Pool (CAIR CSP) for the
States of Delaware, Louisiana, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
The CAIR FIPs require the Administrator to determine by order the CAIR
CSP allowance allocations for units in these States whose owners and
operators requested and qualify for these allocations and to provide
the public with the opportunity to object to the determinations of
allocations and denials of allocations. On August 6, 2009, EPA issued a
NODA setting forth such determinations in the Federal Register and
provided an opportunity for submission of objections. Through the NODA
issued today, EPA is making available to the public the Agency's
determinations, after considering all objections, of CAIR CSP allowance
allocations and denials of such allocations under the FIPs, as well as
the data upon which the allocations and denials of allocations were
based.

DATES: Under Sec.  97.143(d)(5), EPA must record, by January 1, 2010,
the CSP allowance allocations, consistent with this NODA, in the
compliance accounts of units whose owners and operators successfully
applied for a CSP allowance allocation under the CAIR FIPs.
    Docket: EPA established a docket for this action at http://
www.regulations.gov under docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0430. All
documents in the docket (including documents showing EPA's
determinations of CAIR CSP allowance allocations and denials of
allocations and the data upon which the allocations and denial of
allocations were based) are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov
index. Docket materials are available either electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m, Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading
Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is
(202) 566-1742.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning this action
should be addressed to Robert L. Miller, EPA Headquarters, CAMD
(6204J), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, telephone
(202) 343-9077, and e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    For more background and information regarding the purpose of the
NODA, requirements for requesting and receiving CAIR CSP allowances
under the CAIR FIPs, procedures for allocating such allowances, the
application by EPA of requirements to individual CSP allocation
requests, and the interpretation the data upon which CSP allocations
and denial of allocations were based, see the August 6, 2009 NODA (74
FR 39315, Aug. 6, 2009).
    EPA received one objection to the determinations and data in the
August 6, 2009 NODA. EPA responded to the objection in a written
response in which EPA denied the objection (See Document ID EPA-HQ-OAR-
2009-0430-0006). For the reasons set forth in the August 6, 2009 NODA,
the NODA, and the response to the objection, EPA adopts the CSP
allocations set forth in the August 6, 2009 NODA.
    EPA is not requesting objections to the data provided in this final
NODA. This action constitutes a final action for determining the CAIR
CSP allowance allocations under Sec.  97.143 and the CAIR FIPs.

    Dated: October 27, 2009.
Edward Callahan,
Acting Director, Office of Atmospheric Programs.
[FR Doc. E9-27614 Filed 11-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P