Michelle Bell<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 01/06/2006 04:27 PM

To

Jee-Young Kim/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Subject

Community-specific estimates for NMMAPS

Jee-Young,

Attached is an excel spreadsheet with the Maximum Likelihood Estimates

(i.e., the community-specific results) for the 95 communities. These are

the beta estimates for a 1 ppb increase in the previous week's ozone level,

using the constrained distributed lag model.

Best,

Michelle


[Federal Register: January 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 14)]
[Notices]
[Page 4182-4183]
[DOCID:fr23ja09-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 9988-015-Georgia; King Mill Hydroelectric Project]

Augusta Canal Authority; Notice of Proposed Restricted Service
List for a Programmatic Agreement for Managing Properties Included In
or Eligible for Inclusion In the National Register of Historic Places

January 14, 2009.
    Rule 2010 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's
(Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure provides that, to
eliminate unnecessary expense or improve administrative efficiency, the
Secretary may establish a restricted service list for a particular
phase or issue in a proceeding.\1\ The restricted service list should
contain the names of persons on the service list who, in the judgment
of the decisional authority establishing the list, are active
participants with respect to the phase or issue in the proceeding for
which the list is established.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 385.2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission staff is consulting with the Georgia State Historic
Preservation Officer (Georgia SHPO) pursuant to the Council's
regulations, 36 CFR Part 800, implementing section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 470f), to prepare and
execute a programmatic agreement for managing properties included in,
or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places
at the King Mill Project No. 9988-015 (Georgia SHPO Reference Number
HP-060707-003). The Commission staff will also provide the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation an opportunity to comment.
    The programmatic agreement, when executed by the Commission and the
Georgia SHPO, would satisfy the Commission's section 106
responsibilities for all individual undertakings carried out in
accordance with the license until the license expires or is terminated
(36 CFR 800.13[e]). The Commission's responsibilities pursuant to
section 106 for the King Mill Project would be fulfilled through the
programmatic agreement, which the Commission proposes to draft in
consultation with certain parties listed below. The executed
programmatic agreement would be incorporated into any Order issuing a
license.
    The Augusta Canal Authority, as licensee for Project No. 9988-015
is invited to participate in consultations to develop the programmatic
agreement.
    For purposes of commenting on the programmatic agreement, we
propose to restrict the service list for the aforementioned project as
follows:
    Dayton Sherrouse, Executive Director, Augusta Canal Authority, 1450
Green Street, Suite 400, Augusta, GA 30901.
    Don Klima or Representative, Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation, The Old Post Office Building, Suite 803, 1100
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004.
    Elizabeth Shirk or Representative, Historic Preservation Division,
Department of Natural Resources, 34 Peachtree Street, NW., Suite 1600,
Atlanta, GA 30303.
    Alan Stuart, Kleinschmidt Associates, 204 Caughman Farm Lane, Suite
301, Lexington, SC 29072.
    Any person on the official service list for the above-captioned
proceeding may request inclusion on the restricted service list, or may
request that a restricted service list not be established, by filing a
motion to that effect within 15 days of this notice date. In a request
for inclusion, please identify the reason(s) why there is an interest
to be included. Also please identify any concerns about historic
properties, including Traditional Cultural Properties. If historic
properties are to be identified within the motion, please use a
separate page, and label it NON-PUBLIC Information.
    An original and 8 copies of any such motion must be filed with
Kimberly D. Bose, the Secretary of the Commission (888 First Street,
NE., Washington, DC

20426) and must be served on each person whose name appears on the
official service list. Please put the project name ``King Mill
Project'' and number ``P-9988-015'' on the front cover of any motion.
If no such motions are filed, the restricted service list will be
effective at the end of the 15-day period. Otherwise, a further notice
will be issued ruling on any motion or motions filed within the 15-day
period.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-1357 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


at the outlet of    CFR 1065.265,
                                                    the control         Method 18 of 40
                                                    device.             CFR part 60,
                                                                        appendix A-6,c e
                                                                        Method 320 of 40
                                                                        CFR part 63,
                                                                        appendix A,\e\
                                                                        or ASTM Method
                                                                        D6348-03 d e.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Also, you may petition the Administrator for approval to use alternative methods for portable analyzer.
\b\ You may use ASME PTC 19.10-1981, Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses, for measuring the O2 content of the exhaust
  gas as an alternative to EPA Method 3B. AMSE PTC 19.10-1981 incorporated by reference, see 40 CFR 60.17
\c\ You may use EPA Method 18 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A-6, provided that you conduct an adequate pre-survey
  test prior to the emissions test, such as the one described in OTM 11 on EPA's website (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/prelim/otm11.pdf).
\d\ Incorporated by reference; see 40 CFR 60.17.
\e\ You must meet the requirements in Sec.   60.4245(d).

* * * * *

Subpart KKKK--Standards of Performance for Stationary Combustion
Turbines

0
17. In Sec.  60.4415, revise the introductory text to paragraph (a)(1)
to read as follows:

Sec.  60.4415  How do I conduct the initial and subsequent performance
tests for sulfur?

    (a) * * *
    (1) If you choose to periodically determine the sulfur content of
the fuel combusted in the turbine, a representative fuel sample may be
collected either by an automatic sampling system or manually. For
automatic sampling, follow either ASTM D5287 (incorporated by
reference, see Sec.  60.17) for gaseous fuels or ASTM D4177
(incorporated by reference, see Sec.  60.17) for liquid fuels. For
manual sampling of gaseous fuels, follow either GPA 2166 or ISO 10715
(both of which are incorporated by reference, see Sec.  60.17). For
manual sampling of liquid fuels, follow either GPA 2174 or the
procedures for manual pipeline sampling in section 14 of ASTM D4057
(both of which are incorporated by reference, see Sec.  60.17). The
fuel analyses of this section may be performed either by you, a service
contractor retained by you, the fuel vendor, or any other qualified
agency. Analyze the samples for the total sulfur content of the fuel
using:
* * * * *

Subpart QQQQ--Standards of Performance for New Residential Hydronic
Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces

0
18. In Sec.  60.5476 revise paragraph (i) to read as follows:

Sec.  60.5476  What test methods and procedures must I use to determine
compliance with the standards and requirements for certification?

* * * * *
    (i) The approved test laboratory must allow the manufacturer, the
manufacturer's approved third-party certifier, the EPA and delegated
state regulatory agencies to observe certification testing. However,
manufacturers must not involve themselves in the conduct of the test

after the pretest burn has begun. Communications between the
manufacturer and laboratory or third-party certifier personnel
regarding operation of the central heater must be limited to written
communications transmitted prior to the first pretest burn of the
certification test series. During certification tests, the manufacturer
may communicate with the third-party certifier, and only in writing to
notify them that the manufacturer has observed a deviation from proper
test procedures by the laboratory. All communications must be included
in the test documentation required to be submitted pursuant to Sec.
60.5475(b)(5) and must be consistent with instructions provided in the
owner's manual required under Sec.  60.5478(f).
* * * * *
0
19. Amend Appendix A-3 to part 60 by:
0
a. In Method 4, revising sections 2.1, 6.1.5, 8.1.3, <IP_ADDRESS>, 9.1,
11.1, 11.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.1, and 12.2.2 and Figures 4-4
and 4-5; and
0
b. In Method 5, revising sections <IP_ADDRESS>, 6.2.4, 6.2.5, 8.1.2,
<IP_ADDRESS>, 12.1, 12.3, 12.4, 12.11.1, 12.11.2, <IP_ADDRESS>, and <IP_ADDRESS> and
Figure 5-6.
    The revisions read as follows:

Appendix A-3 to Part 60--Test Methods 4 through 5I

* * * * *

Method 4--Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases

* * * * *
    2.1 A gas sample is extracted at a constant rate from the source;
moisture is removed from the sample stream and determined
gravimetrically.
* * * * *
    6.1.5 Barometer and Balance. Same as Method 5, sections 6.1.2 and
6.2.5, respectively.
* * * * *
    8.1.3 Leak-Check Procedures.
    <IP_ADDRESS> Leak Check of Metering System Shown in Figure 4-1. That
portion of the sampling train from the pump to the orifice meter should
be leak-checked prior to initial use and after each shipment. Leakage
after the pump will result in less volume being recorded than is
actually sampled. The following procedure is suggested (see Figure 5-2
of Method 5): Close the main valve on the meter box. Insert a one-hole
rubber stopper with rubber tubing attached into the orifice exhaust
pipe. Disconnect and vent the low side of the orifice manometer. Close
off the low side orifice tap. Pressurize the system to 13 to 18 cm (5
to 7 in.) water column by blowing into the rubber tubing. Pinch off the
tubing and observe the manometer for one minute. A loss of pressure on
the manometer indicates a leak in the meter box; leaks, if present,
must be corrected.
    <IP_ADDRESS> Pretest Leak Check. A pretest leak check of the sampling
train is recommended, but not required. If the pretest leak check is
conducted, the following procedure should be used.
    <IP_ADDRESS>.1 After the sampling train has been assembled, turn on and
set the filter and probe heating systems to the desired operating
temperatures. Allow time for the temperatures to stabilize. If a Viton
A O-ring or other leak-free connection is used in assembling the probe
nozzle to the probe liner, leak-check the train at the sampling site by
plugging the nozzle and pulling a 380 mm (15 in.) Hg vacuum.
    Note: A lower vacuum may be used, provided that it is not exceeded
during the test.
    <IP_ADDRESS>.2 Leak-check the train by first plugging the inlet to the
filter holder and pulling a 380 mm (15 in.) Hg vacuum (see note in
section <IP_ADDRESS>.1). Then connect the probe to the train, and leak-check
at approximately 25 mm (1 in.) Hg vacuum; alternatively, the probe may
be leak-checked with the rest of the sampling train, in one step, at
380 mm (15 in.) Hg vacuum. Leakage rates in excess of 4 percent of the
average sampling rate or 0.00057 m\3\/min (0.020 cfm), whichever is
less, are unacceptable.
    <IP_ADDRESS>.3 Start the pump with the bypass valve fully open and the
coarse adjust valve completely closed. Partially open the coarse adjust
valve, and slowly close the bypass valve until the desired vacuum is
reached. Do not reverse the direction of the bypass valve, as this will
cause water to back up into the filter holder. If the desired vacuum is
exceeded, either leak-check at this higher vacuum, or end the leak
check and start over.
    <IP_ADDRESS>.4 When the leak check is completed, first slowly remove the
plug from the inlet to the probe, filter holder, and immediately turn
off the vacuum pump. This prevents the water in the impingers from
being forced backward into the filter holder and the silica gel from
being entrained backward into the third impinger.
    <IP_ADDRESS> Leak Checks During Sample Run. If, during the sampling run,
a component (e.g., filter assembly or impinger) change becomes
necessary, a leak check shall be conducted immediately before the
change is made. The leak check shall be done according to the procedure
outlined in section <IP_ADDRESS> above, except that it shall be done at a
vacuum equal to or greater than the maximum value recorded up to that
point in the test. If the leakage rate is found to be no greater than
0.00057 m\3\/min (0.020 cfm) or 4 percent of the average sampling rate
(whichever is less), the results are acceptable, and no correction will
need to be applied to the total volume of dry gas metered; if, however,
a higher leakage rate is obtained, either record the leakage rate and
plan to correct the sample volume as shown in section 12.3 of Method 5,
or void the sample run.
    Note: Immediately after component changes, leak checks are
optional. If such leak checks are done, the procedure outlined in
section <IP_ADDRESS> above should be used.
    <IP_ADDRESS> Post-Test Leak Check. A leak check of the sampling train is
mandatory at the conclusion of each sampling run. The leak check shall
be performed in accordance with the procedures outlined in section
<IP_ADDRESS>, except that it shall be conducted at a vacuum equal to or
greater than the maximum value reached during the sampling run. If the
leakage rate is found to be no greater than 0.00057 m\3\ min (0.020
cfm) or 4 percent of the average sampling rate (whichever is less), the
results are acceptable, and no correction need be applied to the total
volume of dry gas metered. If, however, a higher leakage rate is
obtained, either record the leakage rate and correct the sample volume
as shown in section 12.3 of Method 5, or void the sampling run.
* * * * *
    <IP_ADDRESS> At the end of the sample run, close the coarse adjust
valve, remove the probe and nozzle from the stack, turn off the pump,
record the final DGM meter reading, and conduct a post-test leak check,
as outlined in section <IP_ADDRESS>.
* * * * *
    9.1 Miscellaneous Quality Control Measures.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Quality control
           Section                   measure               Effect
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section <IP_ADDRESS>.2...........  Leak rate of the      Ensures the accuracy
                               sampling system       of the volume of
                               cannot exceed four    gas sampled.
                               percent of the        (Reference Method).
                               average sampling
                               rate or 0.00057
                               m\3\/min (0.020
                               cfm).

Section 8.2.1...............  Leak rate of the      Ensures the accuracy
                               sampling system       of the volume of
                               cannot exceed two     gas sampled.
                               percent of the        (Approximation
                               average sampling      Method).
                               rate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    11.1 Reference Method. Weigh the impingers after sampling and
record the difference in weight to the nearest 0.5 g at a minimum.
Determine the increase in weight of the silica gel (or silica gel plus
impinger) to the nearest 0.5 g at a minimum. Record this information
(see example data sheet, Figure 4-5), and calculate the moisture
content, as described in section 12.0.
    11.2 Approximation Method. Weigh the contents of the two impingers,
and measure the weight to the nearest 0.5 g.
* * * * *
    12.1.1 Nomenclature.
    Bws = Proportion of water vapor, by volume, in the gas
stream.
    Mw = Molecular weight of water, 18.015 g/g-mole (18.015
lb/lb-mole).
    Pm = Absolute pressure (for this method, same as
barometric pressure) at the dry gas meter, mm Hg (in. Hg).
    Pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg (29.92 in.
Hg).
    R = Ideal gas constant, 0.06236 (mm Hg)(m\3\)/(g-mole)([deg]K) for
metric units and 21.85 (in. Hg)(ft\3\)/(lb-mole)([deg]R) for English
units.
    Tm = Absolute temperature at meter, [deg]K ([deg]R).
    Tstd = Standard absolute temperature, 293.15 [deg]K
(527.67 [deg]R).
    Vf = Final weight of condenser water plus impinger, g.
    Vi = Initial weight, if any, of condenser water plus
impinger, g.
    Vm = Dry gas volume measured by dry gas meter, dcm
(dcf).
    Vm(std) = Dry gas volume measured by the dry gas meter,
corrected to standard conditions, dscm (dscf).
    Vwc(std) = Volume of water vapor condensed, corrected to
standard conditions, scm (scf).
    Vwsg(std) = Volume of water vapor collected in silica
gel, corrected to standard conditions, scm (scf).
    Wf = Final weight of silica gel or silica gel plus
impinger, g.
    Wi = Initial weight of silica gel or silica gel plus
impinger, g.
    Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor.
    [Delta]Vm = Incremental dry gas volume measured by dry
gas meter at each traverse point, dcm (dcf).
    12.1.2 Volume of Water Vapor Condensed.
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13DE19.011

Where:

K1 = 0.001335 m\3\/g for metric units,
= 0.04716 ft\3\/g for English units.

    12.1.3 * * *
K3 = 0.001335 m\3\/g for metric units,
= 0.04716 ft\3\/g for English units.
* * * * *
    12.2.1 Nomenclature.
    Bwm = Approximate proportion by volume of water vapor in
the gas stream leaving the second impinger, 0.025.
    Bws = Water vapor in the gas stream, proportion by
volume.
    Mw = Molecular weight of water, 18.015 g/g-mole (18.015
lb/lb-mole).
    Pm = Absolute pressure (for this method, same as
barometric pressure) at the dry gas meter, mm Hg (in. Hg).
    Pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg (29.92 in.
Hg).
    R = Ideal gas constant, 0.06236 [(mm Hg)(m\3\)]/[(g-mole)(K)] for
metric units and 21.85 [(in. Hg)(ft\3\)]/[(lb-mole)([deg]R)] for
English units.
    Tm = Absolute temperature at meter, [deg]K ([deg]R).
    Tstd = Standard absolute temperature, 293.15 [deg]K
(527.67 [deg]R).
    Vf = Final weight of condenser water plus impinger, g.
    Vi = Initial weight, if any, of condenser water plus
impinger, g.
    Vm = Dry gas volume measured by dry gas meter, dcm
(dcf).
    Vm(std) = Dry gas volume measured by dry gas meter,
corrected to standard conditions, dscm (dscf).
    Vwc(std) = Volume of water vapor condensed, corrected to
standard conditions, scm (scf).
    Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor.
    12.2.2 Volume of Water Vapor Collected.
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13DE19.012

K5 = 0.001335 m\3\/g for metric units,
= 0.04716 ft\3\/g for English units.
* * * * *

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13DE19.013

Method 5--Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions From Stationary
Sources

* * * * *
    <IP_ADDRESS> Condenser. The following system shall be used to determine
the stack gas moisture content: Four impingers connected in series with
leak-free ground glass fittings or any similar leak-free
noncontaminating fittings. The first, third, and fourth impingers shall
be of the Greenburg-Smith design, modified by replacing the tip with a
1.3 cm (\1/2\ in.) ID glass tube extending to about 1.3 cm (\1/2\ in.)
from the bottom of the flask. The second impinger shall be of the
Greenburg-Smith design with the standard tip. Modifications (e.g.,
using flexible connections between the impingers, using materials other
than glass, or using flexible vacuum lines to connect the filter holder
to the condenser) may be used, subject to the approval of the
Administrator. The first and second impingers shall contain known
quantities of water (Section 8.3.1), the third shall be empty, and the
fourth shall contain a known weight of silica gel, or equivalent
desiccant. A temperature sensor, capable of measuring temperature to
within 1 [deg]C (2 [deg]F) shall be placed at the outlet of the fourth
impinger for monitoring purposes. Alternatively, any system that cools
the sample gas stream and allows measurement of the water condensed and
moisture leaving the condenser, each to within 0.5 g may be used,
subject to the approval of the Administrator. An acceptable technique
involves the measurement of condensed water either gravimetrically and
the determination of the moisture leaving the condenser by: (1)
Monitoring the temperature and pressure at the exit of the condenser
and using Dalton's law of partial pressures; or (2) passing the sample
gas stream through a tared silica gel (or equivalent desiccant) trap
with exit gases kept below 20 [deg]C (68 [deg]F) and determining the
weight gain. If means other than silica gel are used to determine the
amount of moisture leaving the condenser, it is recommended that silica
gel (or equivalent) still be used between the condenser system and pump
to prevent moisture condensation in the pump and metering devices and
to avoid the need to make corrections for moisture in the metered
volume.
    Note: If a determination of the PM collected in the impingers is
desired in addition to moisture content, the impinger system described
above shall be used, without modification. Individual States or control
agencies requiring this information shall be contacted as to the sample
recovery and analysis of the impinger contents.
* * * * *
    6.2.4 Petri dishes. For filter samples; glass, polystyrene, or
polyethylene, unless otherwise specified by the Administrator.
    6.2.5 Balance. To measure condensed water to within 0.5 g at a
minimum.
* * * * *
    8.1.2 Check filters visually against light for irregularities,
flaws, or pinhole leaks. Label filters of the proper diameter on the
back side near the edge using numbering machine ink. As an alternative,
label the shipping containers (glass, polystyrene or polyethylene petri
dishes), and keep each filter in its identified container at all times
except during sampling.
* * * * *
    <IP_ADDRESS> Impinger Water. Treat the impingers as follows: Make a
notation of any color or film in the liquid catch. Measure the liquid
that is in the first three impingers by weighing it to within 0.5 g at
a minimum by using a balance. Record the weight of liquid present. This
information is required to calculate the moisture content of the
effluent gas. Discard the liquid after measuring and recording the
weight, unless analysis of the impinger catch is required (see Note,
section <IP_ADDRESS>). If a different type of

condenser is used, measure the amount of moisture condensed
gravimetrically.
* * * * *
    12.1 Nomenclature.
    An = Cross-sectional area of nozzle, m\2\ (ft\2\).
    Bws = Water vapor in the gas stream, proportion by
volume.
    Ca = Acetone blank residue concentration, mg/mg.
    cs = Concentration of particulate matter in stack gas,
dry basis, corrected to standard conditions, g/dscm (gr/dscf).
    I = Percent of isokinetic sampling.
    L1 = Individual leakage rate observed during the leak-
check conducted prior to the first component change, m\3\/min (ft\3\/
min)
    La = Maximum acceptable leakage rate for either a
pretest leak-check or for a leak-check following a component change;
equal to 0.00057 m\3\/min (0.020 cfm) or 4 percent of the average
sampling rate, whichever is less.
    Li = Individual leakage rate observed during the leak-
check conducted prior to the ``ith'' component change (i =
1, 2, 3 . . . n), m\3\/min (cfm).
    Lp = Leakage rate observed during the post-test leak-
check, m\3\/min (cfm).
    ma = Mass of residue of acetone after evaporation, mg.
    mn = Total amount of particulate matter collected, mg.
    Mw = Molecular weight of water, 18.015 g/g-mole (18.015
lb/lb-mole).
    Pbar = Barometric pressure at the sampling site, mm Hg
(in. Hg).
    Ps = Absolute stack gas pressure, mm Hg (in. Hg).
    Pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg (29.92 in.
Hg).
    R = Ideal gas constant, 0.06236 ((mm Hg)(m\3\))/((K)(g-mole))
{21.85 ((in. Hg) (ft\3\))/(([deg]R) (lb-mole)){time} .
    Tm = Absolute average DGM temperature (see Figure 5-3),
K ([deg]R).
    Ts = Absolute average stack gas temperature (see Figure
5-3), K ([deg]R).
    Tstd = Standard absolute temperature, 293.15 K (527.67
[deg]R).
    Va = Volume of acetone blank, ml.
    Vaw = Volume of acetone used in wash, ml.
    V1c = Total volume of liquid collected in impingers and
silica gel (see Figure 5-6), g.
    Vm = Volume of gas sample as measured by dry gas meter,
dcm (dcf).
    Vm(std) = Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas
meter, corrected to standard conditions, dscm (dscf).
    Vw(std) = Volume of water vapor in the gas sample,
corrected to standard conditions, scm (scf).
    Vs = Stack gas velocity, calculated by Method 2,
Equation 2-7, using data obtained from Method 5, m/sec (ft/sec).
    Wa = Weight of residue in acetone wash, mg.
    Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor.
    [Delta]H = Average pressure differential across the orifice meter
(see Figure 5-4), mm H2O (in. H2O).
    [rho]a = Density of acetone, mg/ml (see label on
bottle).
    [thgr] = Total sampling time, min.
    [thgr]1 = Sampling time interval, from the beginning of
a run until the first component change, min.
    [thgr]i = Sampling time interval, between two successive
component changes, beginning with the interval between the first and
second changes, min.
    [thgr]p = Sampling time interval, from the final (nth)
component change until the end of the sampling run, min.
    13.6 = Specific gravity of mercury.
    60 = Sec/min.
    100 = Conversion to percent.
* * * * *
    12.3 * * *
    K1 = 0.38572 [deg]K/mm Hg for metric units, = 17.636
[deg]R/in. Hg for English units.
* * * * *
    12.4 Volume of Water Vapor Condensed
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13DE19.014

    Where: K2 = 0.001335 m3/g for metric units, = 0.04716
ft3/g for English units.
* * * * *
    12.11.1 * * *

Where:

K4 = 0.003456 ((mm Hg)(m\3\))/((ml)([deg]K)) for metric
units, = 0.002668 ((in. Hg)(ft\3\))/((ml)([deg]R)) for English
units.

* * * * *
    12.11.2 * * *

Where:

K5 = 4.3209 for metric units, = 0.09450 for English
units.

* * * * *
    <IP_ADDRESS> * * *

Where:

K1 = 0.38572 [deg]K/mm Hg for metric units, = 17.636
[deg]R/in. Hg for English units.
Tadj = 273.15 [deg]C for metric units = 459.67 [deg]F for
English units.

* * * * *
    <IP_ADDRESS> * * *

Where:

K1 = 0.38572 [deg]K/mm Hg for metric units, = 17.636
[deg]R/in. Hg for English units.

* * * * *
    18.0 * * *

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13DE19.015

* * * * *
0
20. Amend Appendix A-4 to part 60 by:
0
a. In Method 7C, revising section 7.2.11.
0
b. In Method 7E, revising section 8.5.
    The revisions read as follows:

Appendix A-4 to Part 60--Test Methods 6 Through 10B

* * * * *

Method 7C--Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions From Stationary
Sources--Alkaline-Permanganate/Colorimetric Method

* * * * *
    7.2.11 Sodium Nitrite (NaNO2) Standard Solution, Nominal
Concentration, 1000 [micro]g NO2-/ml. Desiccate
NaNO2 overnight. Accurately weigh 1.4 to 1.6 g of
NaNO2 (assay of 97 percent NaNO2 or greater),
dissolve in water, and dilute to 1 liter. Calculate the exact
NO2-concentration using Equation 7C-1 in section 12.2. This
solution is stable for at least 6 months under laboratory conditions.
* * * * *

Method 7E--Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions From Stationary
Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)

* * * * *
    8.5 Post-Run System Bias Check and Drift Assessment.
    How do I confirm that each sample I collect is valid? After each
run, repeat the system bias check or 2-point system calibration error
check (for dilution systems) to validate the run. Do not make
adjustments to the measurement system (other than to maintain the
target sampling rate or dilution ratio) between the end of the run and
the completion of the post-run system bias or system calibration error
check. Note that for all post-run system bias or 2-point system
calibration error checks, you may inject the low-level gas first and
the upscale gas last, or vice-versa. If conducting a relative accuracy
test or relative accuracy test audit, consisting of nine runs or more,
you may risk sampling for up to three runs before performing the post-
run bias or system calibration error check provided you pass this test
at the conclusion of the group of three runs. A failed post-run bias or
system calibration error check in this case will invalidate all runs
subsequent to the last passed check. When conducting a performance or
compliance test, you must perform a post-run system bias or system
calibration error check after each individual test run.
    * * *
* * * * *
0
21. Amend Appendix A-5 to part 60, Method 12 by:
0
a. Revising sections 7.1.2, <IP_ADDRESS>, <IP_ADDRESS>, <IP_ADDRESS>, 12.3, 16.1
through 16.5;
0
b. Adding sections 16.5.1 and 16.5.2; and
0
c. Removing section 16.6.
    The revisions and additions read as follows:

Appendix A-5 to Part 60--Test Methods 11 Through 15A

* * * * *

Method 12--Determination of Inorganic Lead Emissions From Stationary
Sources

* * * * *
    7.1.2 Silica Gel and Crushed Ice. Same as Method 5, sections 7.1.2
and 7.1.4, respectively.
* * * * *
    <IP_ADDRESS> Brush and rinse with 0.1 N HNO3 the inside of
the front half of the

filter holder. Brush and rinse each surface three times or more, if
needed, to remove visible sample matter. Make a final rinse of the
brush and filter holder. After all 0.1 N HNO3 washings and
sample matter are collected in the sample container, tighten the lid on
the sample container so that the fluid will not leak out when it is
shipped to the laboratory. Mark the height of the fluid level to
determine whether leakage occurs during transport. Label the container
to identify its contents clearly.
* * * * *
    <IP_ADDRESS>. Cap the impinger ball joints.
* * * * *
    <IP_ADDRESS>. Rinse the insides of each piece of connecting glassware
for the impingers twice with 0.1 N HNO3; transfer this rinse
into Container No. 4. Do not rinse or brush the glass-fritted filter
support. Mark the height of the fluid level to determine whether
leakage occurs during transport. Label the container to identify its
contents clearly.
* * * * *
    12.3 Dry Gas Volume, Volume of Water Vapor Condensed, and Moisture
Content. Using data obtained in this test, calculate
Vm(std), Vw(std), and Bws according to
the procedures outlined in Method 5, sections 12.3 through 12.5.
* * * * *
    16.1 Simultaneous Determination of Particulate Matter and Lead
Emissions. This Method 12 may be used to simultaneously determine Pb
and particulate matter provided:
    (1) A glass fiber filter with a low Pb background is used and this
filter is checked, desiccated and weighed per section 8.1 of Method 5,
    (2) An acetone rinse, as specified by Method 5, sections 7.2 and
<IP_ADDRESS>, is used to remove particulate matter from the probe and inside
of the filter holder prior to and kept separate from the 0.1 N
HNO3 rinse of the same components,
    (3) The recovered filter, the acetone rinse, and an acetone blank
(Method 5, section 7.2) are subjected to gravimetric analysis of Method
5, sections 6.3 and 11.0 prior the analysis for Pb as described below,
and
    (4) The entire train contents, including the 0.1 N HNO3
impingers, filter, acetone and 0.1 N HNO3 probe rinses are
treated and analyzed for Pb as described in Sections 8.0 and 11.0 of
this method.
    16.2 Filter Location. A filter may be used between the third and
fourth impingers provided the filter is included in the analysis for
Pb.
    16.3 In-Stack Filter. An in-stack filter may be used provided: (1)
A glass-lined probe and at least two impingers, each containing 100 ml
of 0.1 N HNO3 after the in-stack filter, are used and (2)
the probe and impinger contents are recovered and analyzed for Pb.
Recover sample from the nozzle with acetone if a particulate analysis
is to be made as described in section 16.1 of this method.
    16.4 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-
AES) Analysis. ICP-AES may be used as an alternative to atomic
absorption analysis provided the following conditions are met:
    16.4.1 Sample collection/recovery, sample loss check, and sample
preparation procedures are as defined in sections 8.0, 11.1, and 11.2,
respectively, of this method.
    16.4.2 Analysis shall be conducted following Method 6010D of SW-846
(incorporated by reference, see Sec.  60.17). The limit of detection
for the ICP-AES must be demonstrated according to section 15.0 of
Method 301 in appendix A of part 63 of this chapter and must be no
greater than one-third of the applicable emission limit. Perform a
check for matrix effects according to section 11.5 of this method.
    16.5 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)
Analysis. ICP-MS may be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis provided the following conditions are met:
    16.5.1 Sample collection/recovery, sample loss check, and sample
preparation procedures are as defined in sections 8.0, 11.1, and 11.2,
respectively of this method.
    16.5.2 Analysis shall be conducted following Method 6020B of SW-846
(incorporated by reference, see Sec.  60.17). The limit of detection
for the ICP-MS must be demonstrated according to section 15.0 of Method
301 in appendix A to part 63 of this chapter and must be no greater
than one-third of the applicable emission limit. Use the multipoint
calibration curve option in section 10.4 of Method 6020B and perform a
check for matrix effects according to section 11.5 of this method.
* * * * *
0
22. Amend Appendix A-6 to part 60 by:
0
a. In Method 16B revising sections 2.1, 6.1, 8.2;
0
b. Removing section 8.3;
0
c. Redesignating sections 8.4, 8.4.1, and 8.4.2 as 8.3, 8.3.1, and
8.3.2, respectively;
0
d. Revising section 11.1;
0
e. Adding section 11.2; and
0
f. In Method 16C, revising section 13.1.
    The revisions and addition read as follows:

Appendix A-6 to Part 60--Test Methods 16 Through 18

* * * * *

Method 16B--Determination of Total Reduced Sulfur Emissions From
Stationary Sources

* * * * *
    2.1 A gas sample is extracted from the stack. The SO2 is
removed selectively from the sample using a citrate buffer solution.
The TRS compounds are then thermally oxidized to SO2 and
analyzed as SO2 by gas chromatography (GC) using flame
photometric detection (FPD).
* * * * *
    6.1 Sample Collection. The sampling train is shown in Figure 16B-1.
Modifications to the apparatus are accepted provided the system
performance check in Section 8.3.1 is met.
* * * * *
    8.2 Sample Collection. Before any source sampling is performed,
conduct a system performance check as detailed in section 8.3.1 to
validate the sampling train components and procedures. Although this
test is optional, it would significantly reduce the possibility of
rejecting tests as a result of failing the post-test performance check.
At the completion of the pretest system performance check, insert the
sampling probe into the test port making certain that no dilution air
enters the stack though the port. Condition the entire system with
sample for a minimum of 15 minutes before beginning analysis. If the
sample is diluted, determine the dilution factor as in section 10.4 of
Method 15.
* * * * *
    11.1 Analysis. Inject aliquots of the sample into the GC/FPD
analyzer for analysis. Determine the concentration of SO2
directly from the calibration curves or from the equation for the
least-squares line.
    11.2 Perform analysis of a minimum of three aliquots or one every
15 minutes, whichever is greater, spaced evenly over the test period.
* * * * *

Method 16C--Determination of Total Reduced Sulfur Emissions From
Stationary Sources

* * * * *
    13.1 Analyzer Calibration Error. At each calibration gas level
(low, mid, and high), the calibration error must either not exceed 5.0
percent of the calibration span or [verbar]CDir-
Cv[verbar] must be <=0.5 ppmv.
* * * * *

0
23. In Appendix A-7 to part 60, in Method 24, revise section 6.2 to
read as follows:

Appendix A-7 to Part 60--Test Methods 19 Through 25E

* * * * *

Method 24--Determinaton of Volatile Matter Content, Water Content,
Density, Volume Solids, and Weight Solids of Surface Coatings

* * * * *
    6.2 ASTM D 2369-81, 87, 90, 92, 93, 95, or 10. Standard Test Method
for Volatile Content of Coatings.
* * * * *
0
24. Amend Appendix A-8 to part 60 by:
0
a. In Method 26, revising section 8.1.2; and
0
b. In Method 26A, revising sections 6.1.3 and 8.1.5.
    The revisions read as follows:

Appendix A-8 to Part 60--Test Methods 26 Through 30B

* * * * *

Method 26--Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources Non-Isokinetic Method

* * * * *
    8.1.2 Adjust the probe temperature and the temperature of the
filter and the stopcock (i.e., the heated area in Figure 26-1) to a
temperature sufficient to prevent water condensation. This temperature
must be maintained between 120 and 134 [deg]C (248 and 273 [deg]F). The
temperature should be monitored throughout a sampling run to ensure
that the desired temperature is maintained. It is important to maintain
a temperature around the probe and filter in this range since it is
extremely difficult to purge acid gases off these components. (These
components are not quantitatively recovered and, hence, any collection
of acid gases on these components would result in potential under
reporting of these emissions. The applicable subparts may specify
alternative higher temperatures.)
* * * * *

Method 26A--Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources--Isokinetic Method

* * * * *
    6.1.3 Pitot Tube, Differential Pressure Gauge, Filter Heating
System, Filter Temperature Sensor with a glass or Teflon encasement,
Metering System, Barometer, Gas Density Determination Equipment. Same
as Method 5, sections <IP_ADDRESS>, <IP_ADDRESS>, <IP_ADDRESS>, <IP_ADDRESS>, <IP_ADDRESS>,
6.1.2, and 6.1.3.
* * * * *
    8.1.5 Sampling Train Operation. Follow the general procedure given
in Method 5, Section 8.5. It is important to maintain a temperature
around the probe, filter (and cyclone, if used) between 120 and 134
[deg]C (248 and 273 [deg]F) since it is extremely difficult to purge
acid gases off these components. (These components are not
quantitatively recovered and hence any collection of acid gases on
these components would result in potential under reporting these
emissions. The applicable subparts may specify alternative higher
temperatures.) For each run, record the data required on a data sheet
such as the one shown in Method 5, Figure 5-3. If the condensate
impinger becomes too full, it may be emptied, recharged with 50 ml of
0.1 N H2SO4, and replaced during the sample run. The condensate emptied
must be saved and included in the measurement of the volume of moisture
collected and included in the sample for analysis. The additional 50 ml
of absorbing reagent must also be considered in calculating the
moisture. Before the sampling train integrity is compromised by
removing the impinger, conduct a leak-check as described in Method 5,
section 8.4.2.
* * * * *
0
25. Amend Appendix B to part 60 by:
0
a. In Performance Specification 4B, revising section 4.5;
0
b. In Performance Specification 5, revising sections 5.0 and 8.1;
0
c. In Performance Specification 6, revising sections 13.1 and 13.2;
0
d. In Performance Specification 8, redesignating sections 8.3, 8.4, and
8.5 as 8.4, 8.5, and 8.6, respectively;
0
e. Adding new section 8.3;
0
f. In Performance Specification 9, revising sections 7.2, 8.3, 8.4,
10.1, 10.2, 13.1, and 13.2;
0
g. Adding section 13.4;
0
h. In Performance Specification 18, revising sections 2.3 and 11.9.1.
    The revisions and additions read as follows:

Appendix B to Part 60--Performance Specifications

* * * * *

Performance Specification 4B--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Carbon Monoxide and Oxygen Continuous Monitoring Systems in Stationary
Sources

* * * * *
    4.5 Response Time. The response time for the CO or O2
monitor must not exceed 240 seconds.
* * * * *

Performance Specification 5--Specifications and Test Procedures for TRS
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources

* * * * *
5.0 Safety
    This performance specification may involve hazardous materials,
operations, and equipment. This performance specification may not
address all of the safety problems associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user to establish appropriate safety and health
practices and determine the applicable regulatory limitations prior to
performing this performance specification. The CEMS user's manual
should be consulted for specific precautions to be taken with regard to
the analytical procedures.
* * * * *
    8.1 Relative Accuracy Test Procedure. Sampling Strategy for
reference method (RM) Tests, Number of RM Tests, and Correlation of RM
and CEMS Data are the same as PS 2, sections 8.4.3, 8.4.4, and 8.4.5,
respectively.
    Note: For Method 16, a sample is made up of at least three separate
injects equally space over time. For Method 16A, a sample is collected
for at least 1 hour. For Method 16B, you must analyze a minimum of
three aliquots spaced evenly over the test period.
* * * * *

Performance Specification 6--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Continuous Emission Rate Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources

* * * * *
    13.1 Calibration Drift. Since the CERMS includes analyzers for
several measurements, the CD shall be determined separately for each
analyzer in terms of its specific measurement. The calibration for each
analyzer associated with the measurement of flow rate shall not drift
or deviate from each reference value of flow rate by more than 3
percent of the respective high-level reference value over the CD test
period (e.g., seven-day) associated with the pollutant analyzer. The CD
specification for each analyzer for which other PSs have been
established (e.g., PS 2 for SO2 and NOX), shall
be the same as in the applicable PS.
    13.2 CERMS Relative Accuracy. Calculate the CERMS Relative Accuracy
using Eq. 2-6 of section 12 of Performance Specification 1. The RA of
the CERMS shall be no greater than 20 percent of the mean value of the
RM's test data in terms of the units of the emission standard, or in
cases where the average emissions for the test are less

than 50 percent of the applicable standard, substitute the emission
standard value in the denominator of Eq. 2-6 in place of the RM.
* * * * *

Performance Specification 8--Performance Specifications for Volatile
Organic Compound Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary
Sources

* * * * *
    8.3 Calibration Drift Test Procedure. Same as section 8.3 of PS 2.
    8.4 Reference Method (RM). Use the method specified in the
applicable regulation or permit, or any approved alternative, as the
RM.
    8.5 Sampling Strategy for RM Tests, Correlation of RM and CEMS
Data, and Number of RM Tests. Follow PS 2, sections 8.4.3, 8.4.5, and
8.4.4, respectively.
    8.6 Reporting. Same as section 8.5 of PS 2.
* * * * *

Performance Specification 9--Specifications and Test Procedures for Gas
Chromatographic Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary
Sources

* * * * *
    7.2 Performance Audit Gas. Performance Audit Gas is an independent
cylinder gas or cylinder gas mixture. A certified EPA audit gas shall
be used, when possible. A gas mixture containing all the target
compounds within the calibration range and certified by EPA's
Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous
Calibration Standards may be used when EPA performance audit materials
are not available. If a certified EPA audit gas or a traceability
protocol gas is not available, use a gas manufacturer standard accurate
to 2 percent.
* * * * *
    8.3 Seven (7)-Day Calibration Error (CE) Test Period. At the
beginning of each 24-hour period, set the initial instrument set points
by conducting a multi-point calibration for each compound. The multi-
point calibration shall meet the requirements in section 13.1, 13.2,
and 13.3. Throughout the 24-hour period, sample and analyze the stack
gas at the sampling intervals prescribed in the regulation or permit.
At the end of the 24-hour period, inject the calibration gases at three
concentrations for each compound in triplicate and determine the
average instrument response. Determine the CE for each pollutant at
each concentration using Equation 9-2. Each CE shall be <=10 percent.
Repeat this procedure six more times for a total of 7 consecutive days.
    8.4 Performance Audit Test Periods. Conduct the performance audit
once during the initial 7-day CE test and quarterly thereafter.
Performance Audit Tests must be conducted through the entire sampling
and analyzer system. Sample and analyze the EPA audit gas(es) (or the
gas mixture) three times. Calculate the average instrument response.
Results from the performance audit test must meet the requirements in
sections 13.3 and 13.4.
* * * * *
    10.1 Multi-Point Calibration. After initial startup of the GC,
after routine maintenance or repair, or at least once per month,
conduct a multi-point calibration of the GC for each target analyte.
Calibration is performed at the instrument independent of the sample
transport system. The multi-point calibration for each analyte shall
meet the requirements in sections 13.1, 13.2, and 13.3.
* * * * *
    10.2 Daily Calibration. Once every 24 hours, analyze the mid-level
calibration standard for each analyte in triplicate. Calibration is
performed at the instrument independent of the sample transport system.
Calculate the average instrument response for each analyte. The average
instrument response shall not vary more than 10 percent from the
certified concentration value of the cylinder for each analyte. If the
difference between the analyzer response and the cylinder concentration
for any target compound is greater than 10 percent, immediately inspect
the instrument making any necessary adjustments, and conduct an initial
multi-point calibration as described in section 10.1.
* * * * *
    13.1 Calibration Error (CE). The CEMS must allow the determination
of CE at all three calibration levels. The average CEMS calibration
response must not differ by more than 10 percent of calibration gas
value at each level after each 24-hour period and after any triplicate
calibration response check.
    13.2 Calibration Precision and Linearity. For each triplicate
injection at each concentration level for each target analyte, any one
injection shall not deviate more than 5 percent from the average
concentration measured at that level. When the CEMS response is
evaluated over three concentration levels, the linear regression curve
for each organic compound shall be determined using Equation 9-1 and
must have an r\2\ >= 0.995.
* * * * *
    13.4 Performance Audit Test Error. Determine the error for each
average pollutant measurement using the Equation 9-2 in section 12.3.
Each error shall be less than or equal to 10 percent of the cylinder
gas certified value. Report the audit results including the average
measured concentration, the error and the certified cylinder
concentration of each pollutant as part of the reporting requirements
in the appropriate regulation or permit.
* * * * *

Performance Specification 18--Performance Specifications and Test
Procedures for Gaseous Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources

* * * * *
    2.3 The relative accuracy (RA) must be established against a
reference method (RM) (for example, Method 26A, Method 320, ASTM
International (ASTM) D6348-12, including mandatory annexes, or Method
321 for Portland cement plants as specified by the applicable
regulation or, if not specified, as appropriate for the source
concentration and category). Method 26 may be approved as a RM by the
Administrator on a case-by-case basis if not otherwise allowed or
denied in an applicable regulation.
* * * * *
    11.9.1 Unless otherwise specified in an applicable regulation, use
Method 26A in 40 CFR part 60, appendix A-8, Method 320 in 40 CFR part
63, appendix A, or ASTM D6348-12 including all annexes, as applicable,
as the RMs for HCl measurement. Obtain and analyze RM audit samples, if
they are available, concurrently with RM test samples according to the
same procedure specified for performance tests in the general
provisions of the applicable part. If Method 26 is not specified in an
applicable subpart of the regulations, you may request approval to use
Method 26 in appendix A-8 to this part as the RM on a site-specific
basis under Sec. Sec.  63.7(f) or 60.8(b). Other RMs for moisture,
O2, etc., may be necessary. Conduct the RM tests in such a
way that they will yield results representative of the emissions from
the source and can be compared to the CEMS data.
* * * * *
0
26. In Appendix F to part 60, in Procedure 1, revising section 5.2.3(2)
to read as follows:

Appendix F to Part 60--Quality Assurance Procedures

Procedure 1--Quality Assurance Requirements for Gas Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems Used for Compliance Determination

* * * * *
    5.2.3 * * *
    (2) For the CGA, 15 percent of the average audit value
or 5 ppm, whichever is greater; for diluent monitors,
15 percent of the average audit value.
* * * * *

PART 61--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS

0
27. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
28. In Appendix B to part 61, in Method 107, revising section 12.3,
equation 107-3 to read as follows:

Appendix B to Part 61--Test Methods

* * * * *

Method 107--Determination of Vinyl Chloride Content of In-Process
Wastewater Samples, and Vinyl Chloride Content of Polyvinyl Chloride
Resin Slurry, Wet Cake, and Latex Samples

* * * * *
    12.3 * * *
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13DE19.016

* * * * *

PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES

0
29. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
30. In Sec.  63.2, revise the definition of ``Alternative test method''
to read as follows:

Sec.  63.2  Definitions.

* * * * *
    Alternative test method means any method of sampling and analyzing
for an air pollutant that has been demonstrated to the Administrator's
satisfaction, using Method 301 in appendix A of this part, to produce
results adequate for the Administrator's determination that it may be
used in place of a test method specified in this part.
* * * * *

Subpart LLL--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry

0
31. Amend Sec.  63.1349, by revising paragraphs (b)(7)(viii)(A) and
(B), (b)(8)(vi), and (b)(8)(vii)(B) and C to read as follows:
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (7) * * *
    (viii) * * *
    (A) Determine the THC CEMS average value in ppmvw, and the average
of your corresponding three total organic HAP compliance test runs,
using Equation 12.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13DE19.017

Where:

x = The average THC CEMS value in ppmvw, as propane.
Xi = The THC CEMS data points in ppmvw, as propane, for
all three test runs.
y = The average organic HAP value in ppmvd, corrected to 7 percent
oxygen.
Yi = The organic HAP concentrations in ppmvd, corrected
to 7 percent oxygen, for all three test runs.
n = The number of data points.

    (B) You must use your three run average THC CEMS value and your
three run average organic HAP concentration from your Method 18 and/or
Method 320 compliance tests to determine the operating limit. Use
equation 13 to determine your operating limit in units of ppmvw THC, as
propane.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13DE19.018

Where:

Tl = The 30-day operating limit for your THC CEMS, ppmvw,
as propane.
y = The average organic HAP concentration from Eq. 12, ppmvd,
corrected to 7 percent oxygen.
x = The average THC CEMS concentration from Eq. 12, ppmvw, as
propane.
9 = 75 percent of the organic HAP emissions limit (12 ppmvd,
corrected to 7 percent oxygen)

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (8) * * *
    (vi) If your kiln has an inline kiln/raw mill, you must conduct
separate performance tests while the raw mill is operating (``mill
on'') and while the raw mill is not operating (``mill off''). Using the
fraction of time the raw mill is on and the fraction of time that the
raw mill is off, calculate this limit as a weighted average of the
SO2 levels measured during raw mill on and raw mill off
compliance testing with Equation 17.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13DE19.019

Where:

R = Operating limit as SO2, ppmv.
y = Average SO2 CEMS value during mill on operations,
ppmv.
t = Percentage of operating time with mill on, expressed as a
decimal.
x = Average SO2 CEMS value during mill off operations,
ppmv.
1-t = Percentage of operating time with mill off, expressed as a
decimal.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (8) * * *
    (vii) * * *
    (B) Determine your SO2 CEMS instrument average ppmv, and
the average of your corresponding three HCl compliance test runs, using
Equation 18.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13DE19.020

Where:

x = The average SO2 CEMS value in ppmv.
X1 = The SO2 CEMS data points in ppmv for the
three runs constituting the performance test.
y = The average HCl value in ppmvd, corrected to 7 percent oxygen.
Y1 = The HCl emission concentration expressed as ppmvd,
corrected to 7 percent oxygen for the three runs constituting the
performance test.
n = The number of data points.

    (C) With your instrument zero expressed in ppmv, your
SO2 CEMS three run average expressed in ppmv, and your three
run HCl compliance test average in ppmvd, corrected to 7 percent
O2, determine a relationship of ppmvd HCl corrected to 7
percent O2 per ppmv SO2 with Equation 19.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13DE19.021

Where:

R = The relative HCl ppmvd, corrected to 7 percent
oxygen, per ppmv SO2 for your SO2
CEMS.
y = The average HCl concentration from Eq. 18 in ppmvd, corrected to
7 percent oxygen.
x = The average SO2 CEMS value from Eq. 18 in ppmv.
z = The instrument zero output ppmv value.

* * * * *
0
32. Amend Appendix A to part 63 by:
0
a. In Method 301, revising section 11.1.3;
0
b. In Method 308, revising section 12.4, equation 308-3 and section
12.5, equation 308-5;
0
c. In Method 311, revising sections 1.1 and 17;
0
d. In Method 315, revising Figure 315-1;
0
e. In Method 316, revising section 1.0; and
0
f. In Method 323, revising the method heading and section 2.0.
    The revisions read as follows:

Appendix A to Part 63--Test Methods Pollutant Measurement Methods From
Various Waste Media

* * * * *

Method 301--Field Validation of Pollutant Measurement Methods From
Various Waste Media

* * * * *
    11.1.3 T Test. Calculate the t-statistic using Equation 301-13.
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13DE19.022

* * * * *

Method 308--Procedure for Determination of Methanol Emission From
Stationary Sources

* * * * *
    12.4 * * *
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13DE19.023

    12.5 * * *
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13DE19.024

* * * * *

Method 311--Analysis of Hazardous Air Pollutant Compounds in Paints and
Coatings By Direct Injection Into a Gas Chromatograph

* * * * *
    1.1 Applicability. This method is applicable for determination of
most compounds designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
as volatile hazardous air pollutants (HAP's) (See Reference 1) that are
contained in paints and coatings. Styrene, ethyl acrylate, and methyl
methacrylate can be measured by ASTM D 4827-03 or ASTM D 4747-02.
Formaldehyde can be measured by ASTM D 5910-05 or ASTM D 1979-91.
Toluene diisocyanate can be measured in urethane prepolymers by ASTM D
3432-89. Method 311 applies only to those volatile HAP's which are
added to

the coating when it is manufactured, not to those that may form as the
coating cures (reaction products or cure volatiles). A separate or
modified test procedure must be used to measure these reaction products
or cure volatiles in order to determine the total volatile HAP
emissions from a coating. Cure volatiles are a significant component of
the total HAP content of some coatings. The term ``coating'' used in
this method shall be understood to mean paints and coatings.
* * * * *
    17. * * *
    4. Standard Test Method for Determination of Dichloromethane and
1,1,1-Trichloroethane in Paints and Coatings by Direct Injection into a
Gas Chromatograph. ASTM Designation D4457-02.
    5. Standard Test Method for Determining the Unreacted Monomer
Content of Latexes Using Capillary Column Gas Chromatography. ASTM
Designation D4827-03.
    6. Standard Test Method for Determining Unreacted Monomer Content
of Latexes Using Gas-Liquid Chromatography, ASTM Designation D4747-02.
* * * * *

Method 315--Determination of Particulate and Methylene Chloride
Extractable Matter (MCEM) From Selected Sources at Primary Aluminum
Production Facilities

* * * * *

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13DE19.025

Method 316--Sampling and Analysis for Formaldehyde Emissions From
Stationary Sources in the Mineral Wool and Wool Fiberglass Industries

1.0 Scope and Application

    This method is applicable to the determination of formaldehyde, CAS
Registry number 50-00-0, from stationary sources in the mineral wool
and wool fiber glass industries. High purity water is used to collect
the formaldehyde. The formaldehyde concentrations in the stack samples
are determined using the modified pararosaniline method. Formaldehyde
can be detected as low as 8.8 x 10-\10\ lbs/cu ft (11.3
ppbv) or as high as 1.8 x 10-\3\ lbs/cu ft (23,000,000
ppbv), at standard conditions over a 1 hour sampling period, sampling
approximately 30 cu ft.
* * * * *

Method 323--Measurement of Formaldehyde Emissions From Natural Gas-
Fired Stationary Sources--Acetyl Acetone Derivatization Method

* * * * *
    2.0 Summary of Method. An emission sample from the combustion
exhaust is drawn through a midget impinger train containing chilled
reagent water to absorb formaldehyde. The formaldehyde concentration in
the impinger is determined by reaction with acetyl acetone to form a
colored derivative which is measured colorimetrically.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-26134 Filed 12-12-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49236-49237]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17735]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2014-0022]

Technical Mapping Advisory Council

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Committee management; notice of Federal advisory committee
meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Technical
Mapping Advisory Council (TMAC) will meet in person on August 10-11,
2016 in Reston, VA. The meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: The TMAC will meet on Wednesday, August 10, 2016 from 8:00 a.m.-
5:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT), and Thursday, August 11, 2016
from 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. EDT. Please note that the meeting will close
early if the TMAC has completed its business.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the auditorium of the United
States Geological Survey (USGS) headquarters building located at 12201
Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA 20192. Members of the public who wish
to attend the meeting must register in advance by sending an email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(Attention: Kathleen Boyer) by 11:00 p.m. EDT on
Wednesday, August 3, 2016. Members of the public must check in at the
USGS Visitor's entrance security desk; photo identification is
required.
    For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the meeting, contact
the person listed in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: below as soon as
possible.
    To facilitate public participation, members of the public are
invited to provide written comments on the issues to be considered by
the TMAC, as listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below.
Associated meeting materials will be available at www.fema.gov/TMAC for
review by Tuesday, August 2, 2016. Written comments to be considered by
the

committee at the time of the meeting must be submitted and received by
Wednesday, August 3, 2016, identified by Docket ID FEMA-2014-0022, and
submitted by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Email: Address the email TO<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and
CC<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Include the docket number in the subject
line of the message. Include name and contact detail in the body of the
email.
     Mail: Regulatory Affairs Division, Office of Chief
Counsel, FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Room 8NE, Washington, DC 20472-3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the words
``Federal Emergency Management Agency'' and the docket number for this
action. Comments received will be posted without alteration at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
    Docket: For docket access to read background documents or comments
received by the TMAC, go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for
the Docket ID FEMA-2014-0022.
    A public comment period will be held on Wednesday, August 10, 2016,
from 4:00 to 4:30 p.m. EDT and again on Thursday, August 11, 2016, from
3:00 to 3:30 p.m. EDT. Speakers are requested to limit their comments
to no more than three minutes. The public comment period will not
exceed 30 minutes. Please note that the public comment period may end
before the time indicated, following the last call for comments.
Contact the individual listed below to register as a speaker by close
of business on Tuesday, August 9, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Boyer, Designated Federal
Officer for the TMAC, FEMA, 400 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20024,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, and email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The
TMAC Web site is: http://www.fema.gov/TMAC.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is given under the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. Appendix.
    As required by the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of
2012, the TMAC makes recommendations to the FEMA Administrator on: (1)
How to improve, in a cost-effective manner, the (a) accuracy, general
quality, ease of use, and distribution and dissemination of flood
insurance rate maps and risk data; and (b) performance metrics and
milestones required to effectively and efficiently map flood risk areas
in the United States; (2) mapping standards and guidelines for (a)
flood insurance rate maps, and (b) data accuracy, data quality, data
currency, and data eligibility; (3) how to maintain, on an ongoing
basis, flood insurance rate maps and flood risk identification; (4)
procedures for delegating mapping activities to State and local mapping
partners; and (5) (a) methods for improving interagency and
intergovernmental coordination on flood mapping and flood risk
determination, and (b) a funding strategy to leverage and coordinate
budgets and expenditures across Federal agencies. Furthermore, the TMAC
is required to submit an annual report to the FEMA Administrator that
contains: (1) A description of the activities of the Council; (2) an
evaluation of the status and performance of flood insurance rate maps
and mapping activities to revise and update Flood Insurance Rate Maps;
and (3) a summary of recommendations made by the Council to the FEMA
Administrator.
    Agenda: The TMAC will review and discuss potential recommendations
for the required 2016 TMAC Annual Report. TMAC members may receive
briefings from subject matter experts. In addition, the TMAC members
will identify and coordinate on the TMAC's next steps for Annual Report
production. A brief public comment period will take place at the
beginning of each day during the meeting and prior to any vote. The
full agenda and related briefing materials will be posted for review by
August 3, 2016 at http://www.fema.gov/TMAC.

    Dated: July 9, 2016.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation, Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016-17735 Filed 7-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<META name="generator" content="PDFCreactiveX HTML Export">
<META name="creation-date" content="07/05/2008 08:12:37 ">
<TITLE></TITLE>


MEMORANDUM

To:		Sewage Sludge Incinerator Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0559
From:		Amy Hambrick, US EPA
Date:		March 2012
Subject:	Other unit designs as related to New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources:  Sewage Sludge Incineration Units
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EPA staff organized a teleconference meeting with Uzelac Industries on November 16, 2011 to discuss the design of their Biosolid Combustion Unit as it relates to 40 C.F.R. part 241 and 40 C.F.R. part 60.


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63327-63328]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26308]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2011-0190]

Shipyard Employment Standards; Extension of the Office of
Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information Collection
(Paperwork) Requirements

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comments concerning its proposal to
extend OMB approval of the information collection requirements
contained in the Shipyard Employment Standards (29 CFR 1915.112(a)(1),
29 CFR 1915.112(b)(1)(i), 29 CFR 1915.112(c)(1)(i), 29 CFR
1915.113(b)(1) and 29 CFR 1915.172(d)). The purpose of the collection
of information (paperwork) provisions of the Standards is to reduce
workers' risks of death or serious injury by ensuring that equipment
has been tested and is in safe operating condition.

DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by
December 12, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting
comments.
    Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
    Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service:
When using this method, you must submit a copy of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-2011-0190, U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger, and courier service) are
accepted during the Department of Labor's and Docket Office's normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number (OSHA-2011-0190) for the Information Collection Request
(ICR). All comments, including any personal information you provide,
are placed in the public docket without change and may be made
available online at http://www.regulations.gov. For further information
on submitting comments, see the ``Public Participation'' heading in the
section of this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at
the address above. All documents in the docket (including this Federal
Register notice) are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index;
however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly
available to read or download through the Web site. All submissions,
including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and
copying at the OSHA Docket Office. You may also contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of the ICR.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theda Kenney or Todd Owen, Directorate
of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-3609,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693-2222.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information
collection requirements in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
    This program ensures that information is in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and costs) is minimal, collection instruments
are clearly understood, and OSHA's estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The Occupational Safety and Health Act
of 1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) authorizes information
collection by employers as necessary or appropriate for enforcement of
the OSH Act or for developing information regarding the causes and
prevention of occupational injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29
U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also requires that OSHA obtain such
information with minimum burden upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to reduce to the maximum extent
feasible unnecessary duplication of efforts in obtaining information
(29 U.S.C. 657).
    Manila rope and manila-rope slings (paragraph 1915.112(a)(1)(i))--
The employer must ensure that manila rope and manila-rope slings have
permanently affixed and legible identification markings as prescribed
by the manufacturer that indicate the recommended safe working load for
the

type(s) of hitch(es) used, the angle upon which it is based, and the
number of legs if more than one.
    Wire rope and wire-rope slings (paragraph 1915.112(b)(1)(i))--The
employer must ensure that wire rope and wire-rope slings have
permanently affixed and legible identification markings as prescribed
by the manufacturer that indicate the recommended safe working load for
the type(s) of hitch(es) used, the angle upon which it is based, and
the number of legs if more than one.
    Chain and chain slings (paragraph 1915.112(c)(1)(i))--The employer
must ensure that chain and chain slings have permanently affixed and
legible identification markings as prescribed by the manufacturer that
indicate the recommended safe working load for the type(s) of hitch(es)
used, the angle upon which it is based, and the number of legs if more
than one.
    Shackles (paragraph 1915.113(a)(1))--The employer must ensure that
shackles have permanently affixed and legible identification markings
as prescribed by the manufacturer that indicate the recommended safe
working load.
    Test Records for Hooks (paragraph 1915.113(b)(1))--This paragraph
requires that the manufacturer's recommendations be followed in
determining the safe working loads of the various sizes and types of
hooks. If the manufacturer's recommendations are not available, the
hook must be tested to twice the intended safe working load before it
is initially put into use. The employer must maintain and keep readily
available a certification record which includes the date of such test,
the signature of the person who performed the test, and the identifier
for the hook which was tested.
    The records are used to assure that equipment has been properly
tested. The records also provide the most efficient means for the
compliance officers to determine that an employer is complying with the
Standard.
    Examination and Test Records for Unfired Pressure Vessels
(paragraph 1915.172(d))--This paragraph requires that portable, unfired
pressure vessels not built to the requirements of the American Society
of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII,
Rules for Construction of Unfired Pressure Vessels, 1963 be examined
quarterly by a competent person and subjected to a yearly hydrostatic
pressure test. A certification record of such examinations and tests
shall be maintained.

II. Special Issues for Comment

    OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
     Whether the proposed information collection requirements
are necessary for the proper performance of the Agency's functions,
including whether the information is useful;
     The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
     Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply;
for example, by using automated or other technological information
collection and transmission techniques.

III. Proposed Actions

    OSHA is proposing to increase the existing burden hour estimate for
the collection of information requirements specified by the Standards
from 3,137 hours to 3,163 hours, a total increase of 26 hours. As a
result of the Standards Improvement Project Phase III (SIP-III) Final
Rule, the Agency identified new requirements for employers to have
permanently affixed labels attached to slings and shackles as
prescribed by the manufacturer's recommendations. The Agency will
summarize any comments submitted in response to this notice and will
include this summary in its request to OMB.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Shipyard Employment Standards (29 CFR part 1915).
    OMB Number: 1218-0220.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profits; Not-for-profit
organizations; Federal Government; State, Local, or Tribal Government.
    Number of Respondents: 635.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Average Time per Response: Varies from 2 minutes (.03 hour) to
maintain a certification record to 35 minutes (.58 hour) to obtain
certain information from a manufacturer.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 3,163.
    Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $0.

IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on This Notice and
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions

    You may submit comments in response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number for the ICR (Docket No. OSHA-2011-0190). You
may supplement electronic submissions by uploading document files
electronically. If you wish to mail additional materials in reference
to an electronic or facsimile submission, you must submit them to the
OSHA Docket Office (see the section of this notice titled ADDRESSES).
The additional materials must clearly identify your electronic comments
by your name, date, and the docket number, so the Agency can attach
them to your comments.
    Because of security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the delivery of materials by hand,
express delivery, messenger, or courier service, please contact the
OSHA Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>, (TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>).
    Comments and submissions are posted without change at http://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about
submitting personal information, such as social security numbers and
dates of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index, some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to read or download through this
Web site. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are
available for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
Information on using the http://www.regulations.gov Web site to submit
comments and access the docket is available at the Web site's ``User
Tips'' link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office for information about
materials not available through the Web site, and for assistance in
using the Internet to locate docket submissions.

V. Authority and Signature

    David Michaels, PhD, MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this
notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 4-2010
(75 FR 55355).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on October 5, 2011.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2011-26308 Filed 10-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 43279]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18013]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP12-250-000.
    Applicants: Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Kern River's Response to June 15, 2012 Order.
    Filed Date: 7/16/12.
    Accession Number: 20120716-5144.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/30/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-863-000.
    Applicants: Trunkline Gas Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance with CP12-38-000 to be effective 8/17/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120712-5045.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/24/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-864-000.
    Applicants: LA Storage, LLC.
    Description: LA Storage, LLC Gas Tariff Revised Section 4.1--ACA to
be effective 8/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120712-5073.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/24/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-865-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Transmission, Inc.
    Description: DTI--July 12, 2012 Negotiated Rate Agreements to be
effective 7/13/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120712-5096.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/24/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-866-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: 2012-07-16 Non-Conforming K's Mieco and CIMA to be
effective 7/17/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/16/12.
    Accession Number: 20120716-5104.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/30/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-867-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: By Displacement Only to be effective 7/17/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/16/12.
    Accession Number: 20120716-5117.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/30/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-868-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Tenaska Negotiated to be effective 7/17/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/17/12.
    Accession Number: 20120717-5031.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/30/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-869-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Tenaska Neg Rate to be effective 7/17/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/17/12.
    Accession Number: 20120717-5032.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/30/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-870-000.
    Applicants: Petal Gas Storage, L.L.C.
    Description: Non-conforming Agreement Filing to be effective 7/17/
2012.
    Filed Date: 7/17/12.
    Accession Number: 20120717-5049.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/30/12.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP12-854-001.
    Applicants: Honeoye Storage Corporation.
    Description: Priority Non-Firm Storage Service Filing Amendment to
be effective 8/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120712-5125.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/24/12.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, and service can be found at:
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other
information, call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-
8659.

    Dated: July 18, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-18013 Filed 7-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request U. S. EPA, OECA, Office of Compliance 2. OMB control number b. G None a. 2060 0326 3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. G New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. X Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. X Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. X Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title NESHAP, Magnetic Tape Manufacturing Operations, 40 CFR Part 63, Supart EE 8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) EPA ICR No. 1678.04 9. Keywords Clean Air Act, Air Pollution Control, Environmental Protection, Hazardous Air Pollutant ( HAP)

10. Abstract The standard requires owners of new or modified/ reconstructed magnetic tape manufacturing operations to make reports and to keep records. Quarterly excess emission reports or semiannual compliance reports are required. The reports and records enable the Administrator to determine that maximum achievable control technology is achieved and properly operated and maintained.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. G Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. P Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 13 b. Total annual responses 26 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 0 % c. Total annual hours requested 7042 d. Current OMB inventory 7042 e. Difference 0 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 2. Adjustment 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs 10 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) 79 c. Total annualized cost requested 89 d. Current OMB inventory 89 e. Difference 0 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change 2. Adjustment 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. _ P Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. X Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. X Reporting 1. X On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. X Quarterly 5. X Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. Q Other ( describe)

17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes X No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Steven E. Hoover Phone: ( 202) 564 7007 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

© It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( I) Why the information is being collected; ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( I) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Office Official Michael S. Alushin, Director Manufacturing, Energy & Transportation Division Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Environmental Information ( OEI) Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 19279]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09255]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER13-2483-002.
    Applicants: Old Dominion Electric Cooperative.
    Description: Report Filing: Refund Report of Old Dominion Electric
Cooperative to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 4/24/18.
    Accession Number: 20180424-5169.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/15/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2508-001.
    Applicants: RE Gaskell West 1 LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of RE Gaskell
West 1 LLC.
    Filed Date: 4/24/18.
    Accession Number: 20180424-5280.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/15/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-913-001.
    Applicants: Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation,
a Wisconsin corporation.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Theoretical Reserve Amortization
Supplement to be effective 1/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 4/25/18.
    Accession Number: 20180425-5119.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/16/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1436-000.
    Applicants: C.P. Crane LLC.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Cancellation notice to be
effective 6/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/24/18.
    Accession Number: 20180424-5267.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/15/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1437-000.
    Applicants: C.P. Crane LLC.
    Description: Request for Waiver of C.P. Crane LLC.
    Filed Date: 4/24/18.
    Accession Number: 20180424-5278.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/15/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1438-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of ISA,
Service Agreement No. 3639, Queue No. W4-038 to be effective 6/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/25/18.
    Accession Number: 20180425-5155.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/16/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1439-000.
    Applicants: Northern Indiana Public Service Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: NIPSCO/IMTCO CIAC Agreement
(Marshall Upgrades) to be effective 4/24/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/25/18.
    Accession Number: 20180425-5178.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/16/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1440-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: PJM SA No. 4740 among, PJM, O2
EMC and Virginia Electric and Power Company to be effective 6/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/25/18.
    Accession Number: 20180425-5191.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/16/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 25, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-09255 Filed 5-1-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P