[Federal Register: June 29, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 123)]
[Notices]
[Page 31028-31029]
[DOCID:fr29jn09-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0911, FRL-8923-6]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Notification of Regulated Waste
Activity (Renewal), EPA ICR Number 0261.16, OMB Control Number 2050-
0028

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an
existing approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below,
describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated
burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before July 29, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-
2008-0911, to (1) EPA, either online using http://www.regulations.gov
(our preferred method), or by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail
to: RCRA Docket (28221T), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB, by mail
to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toshia King, Office of Solid Waste,
mailcode 5303W, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On March 13, 2009 (74 FR 10909), EPA sought comments on this
ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any
additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0911, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Docket in the EPA Docket Center
(EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for
the RCRA Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, confidential

business information (CBI), or other information whose public
disclosure is restricted by statute. For further information about the
electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov.
    Title: Notification of Regulated Waste Activity (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR No. 0261.16, OMB Control No. 2050-0028.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2009. Under
OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the
collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: Section 3010 of subtitle C of RCRA, as amended, requires
any person who generates or transports regulated waste or who owns or
operates a facility for the treatment, storage, or disposal (TSD) of
regulated waste to notify EPA of their activities, including the
location and general description of activities and the regulated wastes
handled. The facility is then issued an EPA Identification number. The
facilities are required to use the Notification Form (EPA Form 8700-12)
to notify EPA of their hazardous waste activities. EPA needs this
information to determine the universe of persons who generate, handle,
and manage these regulated wastes; assign EPA Identification Numbers;
and ensure that these regulated wastes are managed in a way that
protects human health and the environment, as required by RCRA, as
amended.
    EPA enters notification information submitted by respondents into
the EPA National data base and assigns EPA Identification Numbers. EPA
uses the information primarily for tracking purposes, and secondarily
for a variety of enforcement and inspection purposes. In addition, EPA
uses this information to identify the universe of regulated waste
generators, handlers, and managers and their specific regulated waste
activities. Finally, EPA uses this information to ensure that regulated
waste is managed properly, that statutory provisions are upheld, and
that regulations are adhered to by facility owners or operators.
    This ICR will eventually be merged with the ICR for the Hazardous
Waste Report (OMB Control No. 2050-0024), since this form (EPA Form No.
8700-12) is part of the Hazardous Waste Report (EPA Form No. 8700-13 A/
B).
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 2
hours per response for the initial notification, and 1 hour per
response for any subsequent notifications. Burden means the total time,
effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate,
maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a
Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the
purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information,
processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing
information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously
applicable instructions and requirements which have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by
this action are business or other for-profit as well as State, Local,
or Tribal governments.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 55,965.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 139,656.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $9,081,569, includes $255,830
annualized capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an increase of 39,349 hours in
the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of
Approved ICR Burdens. This increase is due to the inclusion of State
burden hours that were not previously counted.

    Dated: June 16, 2009.
John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E9-15310 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: December 21, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 243)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 67811-67812]
[DOCID:fr21de09-4]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0457; Airspace Docket No. 09-AAL-10]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Point (Pt.) Thomson, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final Rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E airspace at Pt. Thomson, AK,
to accommodate new Area Navigation (RNAV) special Instrument Approach
Procedures (IAPs) at Pt. Thomson 3 Heliport. The FAA is taking
this action to enhance safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules
(IFR) operations at Pt. Thomson 3 Heliport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, February 11, 2009. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Rolf, AAL-538G, Federal Aviation
Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7587;
telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet address: http://www.faa.gov/about/
office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/systemops/fs/
alaskan/rulemaking/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On Wednesday, October 7, 2009, the FAA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register to establish Class E
airspace at Pt. Thompson, AK (74 FR 51523). Subsequent to publication,
the FAA noted that the title erroneously referred to the airport name
incorrectly. The correct airport name is Pt. Thomson 3
(without a P). Additionally, the airport coordinates were incorrectly
listed and have been corrected in the legal description. With the
exception of editorial changes, and the changes described above, this
rule is the same as that proposed in the NPRM. Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking proceeding by submitting
written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received.
The rule with changes noted above is adopted as proposed.
    The Class E airspace areas designated as 700/1,200 ft. transition
areas are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9T, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 27, 2009, and
effective September 15, 2009, which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by establishing Class E airspace at Pt. Thomson 3
Heliport, to accommodate new RNAV special IAPs at Pt. Thomson
2 Heliport. This Class E airspace will provide adequate
controlled airspace upward from 700 feet above the surface, for the
safety and management of IFR operations at Pt. Thomson 3
Heliport.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Because this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart 1, Section 40103, Sovereignty and use of
airspace. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing
regulations to ensure the safe and efficient use of the navigable
airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because
it creates Class E airspace sufficient in size to contain aircraft
executing instrument procedures for the Pt. Thomson 3 Heliport
and represents the FAA's continuing effort to safely and efficiently
use the navigable airspace.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71-- DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING
POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, is
amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Extending Upward From 700 Feet or
More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AAL AK E5 Point Thomson, AK [New]

Point Thomson 3 Heliport, AK
    (Lat. 70[deg]10'17'' N., long. 146[deg]15'31'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.6-mile radius of the Pt. Thomson, AK.
* * * * *

    Issued in Anchorage, AK, on December 3, 2009.
Michael A. Tarr,
Acting Manager, Alaska Flight Services Information Area Group.
[FR Doc. E9-30172 Filed 12-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: September 28, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 186)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 49355-49356]
[DOCID:fr28se09-21]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 151

46 CFR Part 162

[USCG-2001-10486]
RIN 1625-AA32

Standards for Living Organisms in Ships' Ballast Water Discharged
in U.S. Waters

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice provides the times and locations of the first four
of six public meetings which will be held by the Coast Guard (USCG)
regarding the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) entitled ``Standards
for Living Organisms in Ships' Ballast Water Discharged in U.S.
Waters'' that published in the Federal Register on Friday, August 28,
2009.

DATES: Public meetings will be held in the Seattle, WA (September 28,
2009), New Orleans, LA (September 30, 2009), Chicago, IL (October 2,
2009), Washington, DC (October 8, 2009), Oakland, CA (October 27,
2009), and New York, NY (October 29, 2009) areas to provide
opportunities for oral comments. The comment period for the NPRM closes
on November 27, 2009. All comments and related material submitted after
a meeting must either be submitted to our online docket via
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov on or before November 27, 2009 or
reach the Docket Management Facility by that date.

ADDRESSES: The dates and locations of the first four public meetings
are provided in the following table. All meetings will be held from 9
a.m. until 4 p.m. local time unless otherwise noted. The meetings may
conclude before the allotted time if all matters of discussion have
been addressed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Date                                Location                              Phone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
09/28/2009..............................  Hotel 1000 Seattle, 1000 First<PHONE_NUMBER>.
                                           Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104.
09/30/2009..............................  Hotel Monteleone, 214 Rue Royal,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
                                           New Orleans, LA 70130.
10/02/2009..............................  Hilton Garden Inn Chicago<PHONE_NUMBER>.
                                           Downtown/Magnificent Mile, 10
                                           E. Grand Avenue, Chicago, IL
                                           60611.
10/08/2009..............................  U.S. Environmental Protection<PHONE_NUMBER>.
                                           Agency, 1201 Constitution Ave.,
                                           NW., Washington, DC 20460.
10/27/2009..............................  TBD, Oakland, CA................  TBD.
10/29/2009..............................  TBD, New York, NY...............  TBD.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    You may submit written comments identified by docket number USCG-
2001-10486 before or after the meeting using any one of the following
methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
Our online docket for this rulemaking is available on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov under docket number USCG-2001-10486.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rulemaking, call or e-mail Mr. John Morris, Project Manager,
Environmental Standards Division, U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Ms.
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-
9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard published a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register on Friday, August
28, 2009 (74 FR 44632), entitled ``Standards for Living Organisms in
Ships' Ballast Water Discharged in U.S. Waters.'' In it, we stated our
intention to hold public meetings, and to publish a notice with
additional details regarding those public meetings as soon as the
information was available. 74 FR 44632. On Monday, September 14, 2009,
we published a Notice of Public Meeting to inform the public of the
date for each public meeting, as well as the city in which those
meetings will be held. 74 FR 46964. That notice also stated that
additional notice(s) would be published in the Federal Register as
specific locations and details for these meetings were finalized. On
Tuesday, September 22, 2009, we published a Notice of Public Meeting
with the specific locations and details for the first two of the six
public meetings. 74 FR 48190. This notice provides those details for
the second two public meetings and restates the information for the
first two public meetings. Those details are as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Date                                Location                              Phone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
09/28/2009..............................  Hotel 1000 Seattle, 1000 First<PHONE_NUMBER>.
                                           Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104.

09/30/2009..............................  Hotel Monteleone, 214 Rue Royal,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
                                           New Orleans, LA 70130.
10/02/2009..............................  Hilton Garden Inn Chicago<PHONE_NUMBER>.
                                           Downtown/Magnificent Mile, 10
                                           E. Grand Avenue, Chicago, IL
                                           60611.
10/08/2009..............................  U.S. Environmental Protection<PHONE_NUMBER>.
                                           Agency, 1201 Constitution Ave.,
                                           NW., Washington, DC 20460.
10/27/2009..............................  TBD, Oakland, CA................  TBD.
10/29/2009..............................  TBD, New York, NY...............  TBD.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Written comments and related material may also be submitted to
Coast Guard personnel specified at those meetings for inclusion in the
official docket for this rulemaking.

Information on Service for Individuals with Disabilities

    For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the public meetings,
contact Mr. John Morris at the telephone number or e-mail address
indicated under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice.

    Dated: September 23, 2009.
F.J. Sturm,
Acting Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards, U.S. Coast
Guard.
[FR Doc. E9-23386 Filed 9-24-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 154 (Monday, August 10, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48239-48240]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17383]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Number: PR20-32-001.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: COH SOC Revision
effective Sept 1 2020 to be effective 9/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 7/31/2020.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>41.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/2020.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1426-007.
    Applicants: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation.
    Description: Compliance filing Compliance Filing (GT&C 42)--RP19-
1429 to be effective 2/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 7/29/20.
    Accession Number: 20200729-5101.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/10/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1081-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Expired Negotiated Rate
Agreement--9/30/2020 to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 8/3/20.
    Accession Number: 20200803-5036.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/17/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1082-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Formula Based Negotiated
Rate--10/1/2020 Update to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 8/3/20.
    Accession Number: 20200803-5037.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/17/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1083-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Capacity
Release Agreements--8/1/2020 to be effective 8/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 8/3/20.
    Accession Number: 20200803-5043.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/17/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1084-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--August 2020
Cleanup Filing to be effective 9/3/2020.
    Filed Date: 8/3/20.
    Accession Number: 20200803-5071.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/17/20.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but

intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 4, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-17383 Filed 8-7-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 92 (Thursday, May 12, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27617-27619]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11605]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0471; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-219-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 Series
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    Several operators have reported pitch oscillations and/or
elevator asymmetry caution lights illumination when flying with the
autopilot engaged. Investigations revealed that loose rivets in the
torque tube assemblies caused relative motion between the crank arms
and torque tubes.
    Loose rivets could result in excessive wear and subsequent
significant backlash in the driving crank arms. This condition, if
left uncorrected, will progressively get worse and degrade the
controllability of the aeroplane.

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 27, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard,
Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 416-375-
4539; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Nguyen-Quoc, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0471;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-219-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2010-27, dated August 20, 2010 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:

    Several operators have reported pitch oscillations and/or
elevator asymmetry caution lights illumination when flying with the
autopilot engaged. Investigations revealed that loose rivets in the
torque tube assemblies caused relative motion between the crank arms
and torque tubes.
    Loose rivets could result in excessive wear and subsequent
significant backlash in the driving crank arms. This condition, if
left uncorrected, will progressively get worse and degrade the
controllability of the aeroplane.

Required actions include doing an inspection for the part number of the
left and right elevator torque tube assemblies and, if necessary,
replacing the elevator torque tube assembly or replacing the elevator
torque tube rivets, and re-identifying the assemblies. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Bombardier Inc., has issued Service Bulletin 84-27-50, Revision C,
dated July 26, 2010. The actions described in this service information
are intended to

correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 66 products of U.S. registry. We estimate the
following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
              Action                    Labor cost             Parts cost           product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection.......................  2 x $85 per hour =    None.................            $170          $11,220
                                    $170.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection.
We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need
these replacements:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                 Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace left torque tube......................  15 work-hours x $85 per hour =            $4,354          $5,629
                                                 $1,275.
Replace right torque tube.....................  15 work-hours x $85 per hour =             5,913           7,188
                                                 $1,275.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2011-0471; Directorate Identifier
2010-NM-219-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by June 27, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400, -401,
and -402 airplanes; certificated in any category; serial numbers
4001 through 4305 inclusive.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
controls.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    Several operators have reported pitch oscillations and/or
elevator asymmetry

caution lights illumination when flying with the autopilot engaged.
Investigations revealed that loose rivets in the torque tube
assemblies caused relative motion between the crank arms and torque
tubes.
    Loose rivets could result in excessive wear and subsequent
significant backlash in the driving crank arms. This condition, if
left uncorrected, will progressively get worse and degrade the
controllability of the aeroplane.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Inspection for Part Number

    (g) At the applicable times identified in paragraphs (g)(1) and
(g)(2) of this AD, do an inspection to determine the part numbers of
the left and right elevator torque tubes, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-50,
Revision C, dated July 26, 2010. A review of airplane maintenance
records is acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the part numbers
of the left and right elevator torque tubes can be conclusively
determined from that review.
    (1) For airplanes that have accumulated 8,000 or more total
flight hours as of the effective date of this AD: Within 2,000
flight hours after the effective date of this AD.
    (2) For airplanes that have accumulated less than 8,000 total
flight hours as of the effective date of this AD: Within 6,000
flight hours after the effective date of this AD, but before the
accumulation of 10,000 total flight hours.

Corrective Actions

    (h) If, as a result of the inspection required by paragraph (g)
of this AD, any left elevator torque tube has part number (P/N)
82760709-009, at the applicable time in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2)
of this AD, do the actions in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Replace the elevator torque tube with a new elevator torque
tube having P/N 82760709-011, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-50, Revision C,
dated July 26, 2010.
    (2) Replace the rivets in each elevator torque tube assembly
with Hi Lite pins having P/N B0206001AG8 and collars having P/N
HST1070CY, and re-identify the elevator torque tube assembly having
P/N 82760709-009, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-50, Revision C, dated July 26,
2010.
    (i) If, as a result of the inspection required by paragraph (g)
of this AD, any right elevator torque tube has P/N 82760757-009, at
the applicable time in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, do the
actions in paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Replace the elevator torque tube with a new elevator torque
tube having P/N 82760757-011, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-50, Revision C,
dated July 26, 2010.
    (2) Replace the rivets in each elevator torque tube assembly
with Hi Lite pins having P/N B0206001AG8 and collars having P/N
HST1070CY, and re-identify the elevator torque tube assembly having
P/N 82760757-009, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-50, Revision C, dated July 26,
2010.

Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information

    (j) Actions done before the effective date of this AD, in
accordance with the service bulletins listed in table 1 of this AD,
are considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding
action specified in this AD.

                                        Table 1--Credit Service Bulletins
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Service Bulletin                          Revision                                Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-50  Original............................  March 3, 2010.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-50  A...................................  April 28, 2010.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-50  B...................................  May 19, 2010.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Parts Installation

    (k) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install
on any airplane an elevator torque tube assembly having P/N
82760709-009 or 82760757-009.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (l) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 516-794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

Related Information

    (m) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2010-27,
dated August 20, 2010; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-50,
Revision C, dated July 26, 2010; for related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 5, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-11605 Filed 5-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 56 (Friday, March 22, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10692-10694]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05282]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0700; FRL-9991-10-Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Attainment Plan for Indianapolis and
Terre Haute SO2 Nonattainment Areas

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions that
Indiana submitted to EPA on October 2, 2015 for attaining the 2010
sulfur dioxide (SO2) national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS) for the Indianapolis (Marion County) and Terre Haute (Vigo
County) areas. EPA proposed this action on August 15, 2018 and did not
receive any relevant public comments. These revisions (herein called
the ``attainment plans'' or ``plans'') include Indiana's attainment
demonstration and other elements required under the Clean Air Act (CAA)
for the two areas. In addition to an attainment demonstration, the
plans address: The requirement for meeting reasonable further progress
(RFP) toward attainment of the NAAQS, reasonably available control
measures and reasonably available control technology (RACM/RACT),
emission inventories, and contingency measures. EPA further concludes
that Indiana has demonstrated that the plans provide for attainment of
the 2010 SO2 NAAQS in the Indianapolis and Terre Haute areas
by the attainment date of October 4, 2018.

DATES: This final rule is effective on April 22, 2019.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0700. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly

available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials
are available either through www.regulations.gov or at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Sarah Arra,
Environmental Scientist, at<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting the Region 5
office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Arra, Environmental Scientist,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. What action did EPA propose and why?
II. What comments did EPA receive, and what are EPA's responses?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What action did EPA propose and why?

    On August 15, 2018 (83 FR 40487), EPA proposed to approve an
attainment plan submittal as a revision to Indiana's SIP, submitted on
October 2, 2015, for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS for the Indianapolis
(Marion County), Southwest Indiana (Daviess and Pike Counties), and
Terre Haute (Vigo County) areas. This action finalizes approval for the
Indianapolis and Terre Haute areas only.
    The dispersion modeling results submitted by Indiana show design
values that are less than the standard of 75 parts per billion (ppb),
specifically 73 ppb for the Indianapolis area and 72.6 ppb for the
Terre Haute area. EPA proposed that these areas demonstrate attainment
of the 2010 SO2 standard and meet the applicable
requirements of CAA sections 110, 172, 191, and 192 including emission
inventories, RACT/RACM, RFP, and contingency measures, and that Indiana
has previously addressed requirements regarding nonattainment area new
source review (NSR).

II. What comments did EPA receive, and what are EPA's responses?

    EPA's August 15, 2018 proposed action received one public comment
pertaining to the Southwest Indiana area, but no comments pertaining to
the Indianapolis and Terre Haute areas. Because this final action is
acting on the Indianapolis and Terre Haute areas only, EPA will respond
to the comment for the Southwest Indiana in the applicable, separate
rulemaking. EPA also received two anonymous comments that address
subjects outside the scope of our proposed action, do not explain (or
provide a legal basis for) how the proposed action should differ in any
way, and make no specific mention of the substantive aspects of the
proposed action. Consequently, these comments are not germane to this
rulemaking and require no further response.

III. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is approving Indiana's attainment plans as submitted to EPA on
October 2, 2015, as a revision to Indiana's SIP, for attaining the 2010
SO2 NAAQS for the Indianapolis (Marion County) and Terre
Haute (Vigo County) areas. The attainment plans include Indiana's
attainment demonstrations for the Indianapolis and Terre Haute
nonattainment areas using dispersion modeling to demonstrate that the
emission limits that Indiana adopted into 326 Indiana Administrative
Code Article 7, and submitted for EPA approval, provide for air quality
meeting the SO2 NAAQS.
    The attainment plans also satisfy requirements for emission
inventories, RACT/RACM, RFP, and contingency measures. Additionally,
Indiana has previously addressed requirements regarding nonattainment
area NSR rules \1\. Therefore, EPA has determined that Indiana's
SO2 attainment plans meet the applicable requirements of CAA
sections 110, 172, 191, and 192.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 94 FR 24838 (October 7, 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Indiana
Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
generally available through www.regulations.gov, and at the EPA Region
5 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in
the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are
fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of
the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will
be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP
compilation.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human

health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally
permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February
16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by May 21, 2019. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.

    Dated: March 11, 2019.
Cheryl L. Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  52.770, the table in paragraph (c) under the heading
``Article 7. Sulfur Dioxide Rules'' is amended by:
0
a. Adding, in numerical order, an entry for ``7-1.1-3'' under ``Rule
1.1. Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations'';
0
b. Revising the entry for ``7-2-1'' under ``Rule 2. Compliance'';
0
c. Removing the entries for ``7-4-2'' and ``7-4-3''; and
0
d. Adding, in numerical order, the entries for ``7-4-2.1'' and ``7-4-
3.1'' under ``Rule 4. Emission Limitations and Requirements by
County''.
    The additions and revisions read as follows:

Sec.  52.770  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                        EPA-Approved Indiana Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Indiana
      Indiana citation             Subject       effective date   EPA approval date             Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         Article 7. Sulfur Dioxide Rules
                                  Rule 1.1 Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
7-1.1-3....................  Compliance Date...       10/5/2015  3/22/2019, [Insert
                                                                  Federal Register
                                                                  citation].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Rule 2. Compliance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7-2-1......................  Reporting                10/5/2015  3/22/2019, [Insert
                              Requirements;                       Federal Register
                              methods to                          citation].
                              determine
                              compliance.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Rule 4. Emission Limitations and Requirements by County
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7-4-2.1....................  Marion County             1/1/2017  3/22/2019, [Insert
                              sulfur dioxide                      Federal Register
                              emission                            citation].
                              limitations.
7-4-3.1....................  Vigo County sulfur        1/1/2017  3/22/2019, [Insert
                              dioxide emission                    Federal Register
                              limitations.                        citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-05282 Filed 3-21-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: May 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 87)]
[Notices]
[Page 24941]
[DOCID:fr06my10-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-1093-000]

Delaware City Refining Company LLC; Supplemental Notice That
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section
204 Authorization

April 28, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Delaware City Refining Company LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is May 18, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

 Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-10633 Filed 5-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P