[Federal Register: November 13, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 218)]
[Notices]
[Page 58621-58622]
[DOCID:fr13no09-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

November 3, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP10-110-000.
    Applicants: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company, LLC submits an
amendment to negotiated rate letter agreements with Enterprise Products
Operating LLC re the Gulf Crossing Project.
    Filed Date: 10/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091102-0105.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 12, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-111-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Equitrans, LP submits Seventh Revised Tariff Sheets
No. 317 to FERC Gas Tariff, Original volume No. 1, effective 11/1/09 .
    Filed Date: 10/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091102-0106.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 12, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-112-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits an amendment
to a negotiated rate letter agreement with ONEOK Entergy Services Co.,
LP re the Southeast Expansion Project.
    Filed Date: 10/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091102-0107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 12, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-113-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits capacity
release agreement containing negotiated rate provisions executed by
Texla Energy Management, Inc.
    Filed Date: 10/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091102-0108.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 12, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-115-000.
    Applicants: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company submits
amended negotiated rate agreement between CEGT and BD Energy Trading
LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091102-0152.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 12, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-116-000.
    Applicants: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Co.
    Description: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company submits
amended negotiated rate agreement between CEGT and Tenaska Marketing
Ventures.
    Filed Date: 10/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091102-0153.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 12, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-117-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC submits Fourth Revised
Sheet 40 to FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume 1, to be effective
12/1/09.
    Filed Date: 11/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091102-0154.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 16, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-118-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits capacity
release agreements containing negotiated rate provisions executed with
BP Energy Company.
    Filed Date: 10/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091102-0158.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 12, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-119-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC submits an
amendment to the Transportation Rate Schedules FTS Agreement with a
negotiated rate exhibit with Wisconsin Electric Power Company.
    Filed Date: 10/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091102-0155.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 12, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-120-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits Forty-Sixth
Revised Sheet 26 et al. to FERC Gas Tariff, Seventh Revised Volume 1
and First Revised Volume 2, to be effective 12/1/09.
    Filed Date: 10/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091103-0054.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 12, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-121-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC submits three negotiated
rate agreements with Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc. et al.
    Filed Date: 11/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091103-0053.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 16, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-122-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company.
    Description: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company submits Fifth Revised
Sheet 412A et al. to its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume 1,
effective 12/2/09.
    Filed Date: 11/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091103-0052.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 16, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-123-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: ANR Pipeline Company submits Rate Schedule ETS and
eleven Rate Schedule FTS-1 negotiated rate service agreements, to be
effective 11/1/09.
    Filed Date: 11/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091103-0051.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 16, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-124-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company.
    Description: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company submits Eighteenth
Revised Sheet 4 to its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume 2, effective
12/2/09 under RP10-124.
    Filed Date: 11/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091103-0050.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 16, 2009.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-27300 Filed 11-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


From:  <EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 4:20 PM To:  Coke ICR2<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:  Brett Tunno has shared the folder 'Coke ICR - U. S. Steel Submittal' with you.

Brett Tunno has shared the folder Coke ICR - U. S. Steel Submittal with you.

Note From Brett:                                          Good afternoon, Dr. Jones,

I uploaded the Clairton cooling tower test report and corresponding results spreadsheet to this Sharefile folder.

Please let me know if you have trouble accessing.

Thank you, Bret t Tunno

Click here to view this folder

ShareFile is a tool for sending, receiving, and organizing your business files online. It can be used as a password-protected area for sharing information with clients and partners, and it's an easy way to send files that are too large to e-mail.

Trouble with the above link? You can copy and paste the following URL into your web browser: https://ussteel.sharefile.com/f/fo501e03-a594-4b9f-9136-dad9c4d1ba87

Powered By Citrix ShareFile 2022

<< AST-2022-3353 US Steel Cooling Tower ICR_F.pdf >> << Coke-Enc2-Emission-Test-Data_USS Clairton.xlsx >>


[Federal Register: September 27, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 187)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 54835-54837]
[DOCID:fr27se07-12]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01-07-091]
RIN 1625-AA09

Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Quinnipiac River, New Haven, CT

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has temporarily changed the drawbridge
operating regulations governing the operation of the Ferry Street
Bridge, across the Quinnipiac River, mile 0.7, at New Haven,
Connecticut. This temporary final rule allows the bridge owner to keep
one of the two moveable bascule spans in the closed position at all
times from September 28, 2007 through April 30, 2008. This rule is
necessary to facilitate scheduled bridge maintenance.

DATES: This temporary rule is effective from September 28, 2007 through
April 30, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket (CGD01-07-091) and are available for inspection or
copying at the First Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch Office, 408
Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, between 7 a.m. and 3
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer,
First Coast Guard District,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    On August 21, 2007, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulations''; Quinnipiac River,
Connecticut, in the Federal Register (72 FR 46586). We received no
comments in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking. No public
hearing was requested and none was held.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
    The bridge repairs scheduled to begin on September 28, 2007, are
necessary repairs that must be performed with all due speed to assure
the continued safe and reliable operation of the bridge. Any delay in
making this rule effective would not be in the best interest of public
safety and the marine interests that use the Quinnipiac River.
    The recreational vessels that normally use this waterway are small
enough in size that they can either pass under the spans without a
bridge opening or safely pass through the bridge with a single span
opening.

Background and Purpose

    The Street Bridge, across the Quinnipiac River, mile 0.7, at New
Haven, Connecticut, has a vertical clearance in the closed position of
25 feet at mean high water and 31 feet at mean low water. The existing
regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.213.
    In early 2007, the Connecticut Department of Transportation
requested a temporary deviation to facilitate scheduled structural
repairs and bridge painting at the Ferry Street Bridge at New Haven,
Connecticut. In order to perform the structural repairs, one bascule
bridge span had to remain in the closed position while the other span
could remain in the full open position at all times for the passage of
vessel traffic.
    As a result of the above request, the Coast Guard published a
temporary deviation from the drawbridge operation regulations in the
Federal Register (72 FR 18884), on April 16, 2007, in effect from April
16, 2007 through September 27, 2007.
    On June 22, 2007, the Coast Guard was notified that the scheduled
repairs authorized under the temporary deviation listed above would not
be completed by the end of the effective period scheduled to end on
September 27, 2007.
    As a result of the above information, Connecticut Department of
Transportation requested a temporary regulation to allow the repair
work to continue at the bridge through April 30, 2008, in order to
complete the remaining work.
    Under this temporary final rule, in effect from September 28, 2007
through April 30, 2008, the Ferry Street Bridge across the Quinnipiac
River, mile 0.7, at New Haven, Connecticut, will keep one of the two
bascule bridge spans in the closed position at all times while keeping
the second bascule span in the fully open position for the passage of
vessel traffic at all times.

Discussion of Comments and Changes

    The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking and as a result, no changes have been made to this
temporary final rule.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3), of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
    This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will continue
to open for vessel traffic with a single moveable span which is
sufficient for the present needs of navigation.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not

dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will continue
to open for vessel traffic with a single moveable span which is
sufficient for the present needs of navigation.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    No small entities requested Coast Guard assistance and none was
given.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This final rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have substantial direct effect on one
or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation considering that it relates to the
promulgation of operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR
part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. From September 28, 2007 through April 30, 2008, Sec.  117.213 is
amended by suspending paragraph (a) and adding a temporary paragraph
(g) to read as follows:

Sec.  117.213  Connecticut River.

* * * * *
    (g) The draws shall open on signal; except as follows:
    (1) From 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m., noon to 12:15 p.m., 12:45 p.m. to
1 p.m., and

4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., the draws need not be opened.
    (2) The draw of the Ferry Street Bridge, mile 0.7, at New Haven,
shall maintain one of the two moveable bascule bridge spans in the full
open position at all times for the passage of vessel traffic. The
second moveable bascule bridge span may remain in the closed position
at all times.
    (3) From 11 p.m. to 7 a.m., the draw of the Grand Avenue Bridge,
Quinnipiac River, shall open on signal if at least one hour notice is
given to the tender at the Ferry Street Bridge. In the event that the
tender is at the Chapel Street Bridge, a delay of up to an additional
hour may be expected.
    (4) From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m., the draw of the Chapel Street Bridge,
Mill River, shall open on signal if at least one hour notice is given
to the tender at Ferry Street Bridge. In the event the tender is at the
Grand Avenue Bridge, a delay of up to an additional hour may be
expected.

    Dated: September 21, 2007.
Timothy V. Skuby,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, First Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. E7-19109 Filed 9-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 45 (Friday, March 6, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13057-13059]
[FR Doc No: 2020-04356]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2019-0467; FRL-10006-00-Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Second Limited Maintenance Plans for
1997 Ozone NAAQS

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a state implementation plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of Michigan. On July 24, 2019, the
state submitted the 1997 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) Limited Maintenance Plans (LMPs) for the Benzie County, Flint
(Genesee and Lapeer Counties), Grand Rapids (Ottawa and Kent Counties),
Huron County, Kalamazoo-Battle Creek (Calhoun, Kalamazoo, and Van Buren
Counties), Lansing-East Lansing (Clinton, Eaton, and Ingham Counties),
and Mason County areas. EPA is approving these Michigan LMPs because
they provide for the maintenance of the 1997 ozone NAAQS through the
end of the second 10-year portion of the maintenance period. EPA
proposed to approve the submission on December 4, 2019, and received
two comments. This approval makes certain commitments related to
maintenance of the 1997 ozone NAAQS in these areas federally
enforceable as part of the Michigan SIP.

DATES: This final rule is effective on April 6, 2020.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2019-0467. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
through www.regulations.gov or at the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. We recommend that you telephone Matt Rau,
Environmental Engineer, at<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting the Region 5
office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer,
Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.

I. Background Information

    On December 4, 2019 (84 FR 66347), EPA proposed to approve the 1997
ozone NAAQS LMPs for the Benzie County, Flint, Grand Rapids, Huron
County, Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, Lansing-East Lansing, and Mason County
areas, submitted by Michigan on July 24, 2019. An explanation of the
CAA requirements, a detailed analysis of the revisions, and EPA's
reasons for proposing approval were provided in the notice of proposed
rulemaking. EPA will not reiterate the reasons for approval in this
rule. The public comment period ended on January 3, 2020. EPA received
two comments on the proposal.

II. Response to Comments

    EPA received two anonymous comments during the comment period. A
summary of each comment precedes EPA's response. The full comments are
in the rulemaking docket, see Addresses for details on accessing the
docket.
    Comment 1: Please explicitly state when the second maintenance
period ends. Also, please explain what happens to the state's
maintenance plan once the second maintenance plan ends.
    Response: EPA approved maintenance plans for the Benzie County,
Flint, Grand Rapids, Huron County, Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, Lansing-East
Lansing, and Mason County areas effective on May 16, 2007 (72 FR
27425). The LMPs for these areas provide for the maintenance of the
1997 ozone NAAQS through the end of the second 10-year portion of the
maintenance period. Thus, the maintenance period ends on May 16, 2027.
    At the end of the 20-year maintenance period the maintenance plan
remains in place and in effect. A state may revise its SIP, including
its maintenance plan, after the 20-year period, subject to a CAA
section 110(l) demonstration.
    Comment 2: EPA should disapprove the contingency measures until the
state comes up with better, more specific and not yet implemented
contingency measures.
    Response: Contrary to the commenter's assertion, Michigan has
included a list of specific potential contingency measures in its
maintenance plan. These measures are the same list as was included in
the original maintenance plans for the areas. While some of the
measures may have been implemented, this is certainly not the case for
all such as portable fuel container replacement rule, reduce idling
program, transit improvements, etc. Even if the State has adopted some
measures in a category, that doesn't preclude the State from adopting
additional measures in the same category. For example, if a state had
adopted a reduced idling program, the state could still implement a
more stringent program across a wider portion of the vehicle fleet.
Furthermore, because it is not possible to determine what control
measure will be most appropriate and effective should a contingency
measure be triggered at some point in the future, Michigan is not
limited to selecting measures only from its list. If a contingency
measure is triggered, Michigan may adopt a contingency measure from
this list or chose another contingency measure which has been
determined to be effective.

III. Final Action

    EPA is approving the LMPs for the Benzie County, Flint (Genesee and
Lapeer Counties), Grand Rapids (Ottawa and Kent Counties), Huron
County, Kalamazoo-Battle Creek (Calhoun, Kalamazoo, and Van Buren
Counties), Lansing-East Lansing (Clinton, Eaton, and Ingham Counties),
and Mason County areas in Michigan for the 1997 ozone NAAQS. EPA finds
the LMPs are adequate to provide for maintenance of the 1997 ozone
NAAQS in these areas through the end of the second 10-year portion of
the maintenance period.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under section 175A of the CAA, the Administrator is required to
approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because it is not a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by May 5, 2020. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: February 21, 2020.
Kurt A. Thiede,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
    Amend 40 CFR part 52 as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  52.1170, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by revising
the three entries for ``1997 8-hour ozone'' under ``Maintenance Plans''
to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1170  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                       EPA-Approved Michigan Nonregulatory and Quasi-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Name of nonregulatory  SIP     Applicable geographic   State submittal
           provision              or nonattainment area         date        EPA approval date       Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                Maintenance Plans
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
1997 8-hour ozone..............  Benzie County, Flint,   7/24/2019........  3/6/2020, [insert  2nd limited
                                  Grand Rapids, Huron                        Federal Register   maintenance
                                  County, Kalamazoo-                         citation].         plan.
                                  Battle Creek, Lansing-
                                  East Lansing, and
                                  Mason County.
1997 8-hour ozone..............  Benton Harbor, Cass     6/13/2006, 8/25/   5/16/2007, 72 FR
                                  County, and Muskegon.   2006, and 11/30/   27425.
                                                          2006.
1997 8-hour ozone..............  Detroit-Ann Arbor.....  3/6/2009.........  6/29/2009, 74 FR
                                                                             30950.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-04356 Filed 3-5-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P