[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 81 (Monday, April 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23344-23345]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09599]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC14-78-000.
    Applicants: NRG Energy, Inc, NRG Yield, Inc.
    Description: Application for Blanket Authorization Under Section
203 of the Federal Power Act of NRG Energy, Inc.
    Filed Date: 4/18/14.
    Accession Number: 20140418-5195.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/14.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER10-2354-002.
    Applicants: Midway-Sunset Cogeneration Company.
    Description: Supplement to March 31, 2013 Notice of Change of
Status of Midway Sunset Cogeneration Company.
    Filed Date: 4/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20140421-5171.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/12/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4267-007; ER11-4270-007; ER11-4269-008; ER11-
4268-007; ER11-113-008; ER10-2682-007; ER12-1680-005; ER11-4694-004.
    Applicants: Algonquin Energy Services Inc., Algonquin Power Windsor
Locks, LLC, Algonquin Tinker Gen Co., Algonquin Northern Maine Gen Co.,
Sandy Ridge Wind, LLC, Granite State Electric Company, Minonk Wind,
LLC,GSG 6, LLC.
    Description: Second supplement to December 31, 2013 Triennial
Market Power Update for the Northeast Region of the APUC Entities.
    Filed Date: 4/15/14.
    Accession Number: 20140415-5047.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/6/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-375-001.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: OATT Order No. 764 Compliance Filing to be effective
11/13/2013.
    Filed Date: 4/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20140421-5150.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/12/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-495-001.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Order 764 Compliance Filing Docket No. ER14-795 to be
effective 5/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 4/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20140421-5144.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/12/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1363-001; ER10-3195-002; ER10-3194-002.
    Applicants: Kendall Green Energy LLC, MATEP Limited Partnership,
MATEP LLC.
    Description: Second Substitute Appendix B to February 28, 2014
Notice of Change in Status of Kendall Green Energy LLC, et. al.
    Filed Date: 4/14/14.
    Accession Number: 20140414-5272.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/5/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1743-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: 1839R2 City of Osage City, Kansas NITSA and NOA
Cancellation to be effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 4/18/14.
    Accession Number: 20140418-5185.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1744-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: 1896R2 Westar Energy, Inc. NITSA and NOA Notice of
Cancellation to be effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 4/18/14.
    Accession Number: 20140418-5186.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1745-000.
    Applicants: Cross Border Energy LLC.
    Description: Notice of Cancellation to be effective 4/21/2014.
    Filed Date: 4/18/14.
    Accession Number: 20140418-5197.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1746-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: Tariff Revisions To Attachment E to be effective 6/21/
2014.
    Filed Date: 4/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20140421-5142.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/12/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1747-000.

    Applicants: Inertia Power II, LLC.
    Description: Initial Filing to be effective 4/25/2014.
    Filed Date: 4/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20140421-5208.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/12/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1748-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 2014-04-21 Elimination of Funds Trust Agreement to be
effective 6/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 4/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20140421-5214.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/12/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1749-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 2014-04-21 Elimination of Trust Funds Filing to be
effective 6/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 4/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20140421-5215.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/12/14.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:
    Docket Numbers: ES14-36-000.
    Applicants: NSTAR Electric Company.
    Description: Application of NSTAR Electric Company for Authority to
Issue Short-Term Debt Securities.
    Filed Date: 4/18/14.
    Accession Number: 20140418-5229.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/14.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following open access
transmission tariff filings:
    Docket Numbers: OA08-5-005; ER14-596-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Annual Compliance Report Regarding Penalties for
Unreserved Use of Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Filed Date: 4/18/14.
    Accession Number: 20140418-5230.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/14.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 21, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-09599 Filed 4-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: September 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 183)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 48478-48480]
[DOCID:fr23se09-21]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2007-0359; FRL-8960-8]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans, Alabama: Clean
Air Interstate Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a portion of the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Alabama,
through the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM), on
March 7, 2007. This action proposes to approve the portion of the March
7, 2007, submittal that addresses State reporting requirements under
the Nitrogen Oxide (NOX) SIP Call and the Clean Air
Interstate Rule (CAIR) found in 40 CFR 51.122 and 51.125 as amended by
the CAIR rulemakings. Specifically, in this action EPA is proposing to
approve revisions to Chapter 335-3-1 ``General Provisions.'' In
previous rulemakings, EPA took action on the other portions of the
March 7, 2007, SIP submittal, which included revisions to Chapters 335-
3-5, and 335-3-8 (October 1, 2007, 72 FR 55659) and Chapter 335-3-17
(March 26, 2009, 74 FR 13118). Although the DC Circuit Court found CAIR
to be flawed, the rule was remanded without vacatur and thus remains in
place. Thus, EPA is continuing to approve CAIR provisions into SIPs as
appropriate. CAIR, as promulgated, requires States to reduce emissions
of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and NOX that
significantly contribute to, or interfere with maintenance of, the
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for fine particulates
and/or ozone in any downwind state. CAIR establishes budgets for
SO2 and NOX for States that contribute
significantly to

nonattainment in downwind States and requires the significantly
contributing States to submit SIP revisions that implement these
budgets. States have the flexibility to choose which control measures
to adopt to achieve the budgets, including participation in EPA-
administered cap-and-trade programs addressing SO2,
NOX annual, and NOX ozone season emissions. This
action is being taken pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 23, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2007-0359, by one of the following methods:
    1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2007-0359,'' Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
    5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Ms. Lynorae Benjamin, Chief,
Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours
of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. ``EPA-R04-OAR-
2007-0359.'' EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through http:/
/www.regulations.gov or e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in http://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Stacy Harder, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number
is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Ms. Harder can also be reached via electronic mail
at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For information pertaining to the Alabama
State SIP, please contact Mr. Zuri Farngalo, by phone at (404) 562-
9152, or electronic mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. What Action Is EPA Proposing To Take?
II. What Is the Regulatory History of CAIR?
III. What Is EPA's Analysis of Alabama's Submission?
IV. Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What Action Is EPA Proposing To Take?

    EPA is proposing to approve a SIP revision submitted by ADEM, on
March 7, 2007, pertaining to rules for CAIR. The revisions include
changes to Chapter 335-3-1 ``General Provisions.'' Specifically, ADEM
is amending Section 335-3-1-.14 ``Emissions Reporting Requirements
Relating to Budgets for NOx Emissions,'' and adding a new Section 335-
3-1-.16 ``Emissions Reporting Requirements Relating to Budgets for
SO2 and NOX Emissions.'' These revisions became
State effective on April 3, 2007.

II. What Is the Regulatory History of CAIR?

    EPA published CAIR on May 12, 2005 (70 FR 25162). In this rule, EPA
determined that 28 States and the District of Columbia contribute
significantly to nonattainment and interfere with maintenance of the
NAAQS for fine particles (PM2.5) and/or 8-hour ozone in
downwind States in the eastern part of the country. As a result, EPA
required those upwind States to revise their SIPs to include control
measures that reduce emissions of SO2, which is a precursor
to PM2.5 formation, and/or NOX, which is a
precursor to both ozone and PM2.5 formation. For
jurisdictions that contribute significantly to downwind
PM2.5 nonattainment, CAIR sets annual State-wide emission
reduction requirements (i.e., budgets) for SO2 and annual
State-wide emission reduction requirements for NOX.
Similarly, for jurisdictions that contribute significantly to 8-hour
ozone nonattainment, CAIR sets State-wide emission reduction
requirements or budgets for NOX for the ozone season (May
1st to September 30th). Under CAIR, States may implement these
reduction requirements by participating in the EPA-administered cap-
and-trade programs or by adopting any other control measures.
    EPA was sued by a number of parties on various aspects of CAIR, and
on July 11, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit issued its decision to vacate and remand both CAIR and
the associated CAIR Federal Implementation Plans (FIP) in their
entirety. North Carolina v. EPA, 531 F.3d 836 (DC Cir. Jul. 11, 2008).
However, in response to EPA's petition for rehearing, the Court issued
an order remanding CAIR to EPA without vacating either CAIR or the CAIR
FIPs. North Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1176 (DC Cir. Dec. 23, 2008). The
Court

thereby left CAIR in place in order to ``temporarily preserve the
environmental values covered by CAIR'' until EPA replaces it with a
rule consistent with the Court's opinion. Id. at 1178. The Court
directed EPA to ``remedy CAIR's flaws'' consistent with its July 11,
2008, opinion, but declined to impose a schedule on EPA for completing
that action. Id.
    According to 40 CFR 51.125, each state submitting a CAIR SIP
revision must provide for emissions reporting requirements of
SO2 and NOX emissions data. EPA is proposing to
approve revisions to Alabama's Section 335-3-1-.14 and addition of
Section 335-3-1-.16 to fulfill this requirement. Consistent with 40 CFR
51.121, these rule revisions allow the State to make the transition
from the NOX budget trading program (NOX SIP
Call) to the CAIR NOX ozone season trading program,
beginning with the 2009 ozone season. Alabama's NOX budget
trading program does not apply to any ozone season after the 2008 ozone
season.
    This proposed action is consistent with the Court's decision in
North Carolina v. EPA discussed above. While the Court identified
several issues with CAIR, the rule was not vacated because of the loss
of environmental benefit generated by the rule. As EPA works to remedy
CAIR to satisfy the Court, CAIR remains in effect, including its
trading programs. Currently, Alabama's NOX SIP Call trading
program ends after the 2008 ozone season, and so to continue the
environmental benefits of the trading program, consistent with CAIR and
the Court's opinion, Alabama must revise its SIP, as proposed, to
transition into the CAIR NOX trading program.

IV. Proposed Action

    EPA is proposing to approve the aforementioned revisions,
specifically, Chapter 335-3-1, Sections 335-3-1-.14, and 335-3-1-.16
into the Alabama SIP. These revisions were submitted by ADEM on March
7, 2007, and are consistent with EPA regulations, policy, and guidance.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
proposed action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: September 11, 2009.
J. Scott Gordon,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. E9-22904 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: March 12, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 49)]
[Notices]
[Page 13269-13271]
[DOCID:fr12mr08-124]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57434; File No. SR-Phlx-2008-19]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to the Specialist Option Transaction Charge Credit Pilot
Program

March 5, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 28, 2008, Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx''
or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the
Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act,\3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\
which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Phlx proposes to expand the Exchange's current $0.21 per contract
specialist option transaction charge credit pilot program and to amend
the Exchange's fee schedule to include all customer orders that are
delivered electronically by Phlx XL \5\ and subsequently executed via
the Intermarket Option Linkage (``Linkage'') \6\ as a Principal Acting
as Agent (``P/A'') order.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Phlx XL, formerly referred to as AUTOM, is the Exchange's
electronic options trading platform. See Exchange Rule 1080.
    \6\ Linkage is governed by the Options Linkage Authority under
the conditions set forth under the Plan for the Purpose of Creating
and Operating an Intermarket Option Linkage (the ``Plan'') approved
by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The registered U.S.
options markets are linked together on a real-time basis through a
network capable of transporting orders and messages to and from each
market.
    \7\ A P/A order is an order for the principal account of a
specialist (or equivalent entity on another participant exchange
that is authorized to represent public customer orders), reflecting
the terms of a related unexecuted public customer order for which
the specialist is acting as agent. See Plan for the Purpose of
Creating and Operating an Intermarket Option Linkage Section
2(16)(a) and Exchange Rule 1083.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While changes to the fee schedule pursuant to this proposal are
effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated the changes to be in
effect for transactions settling on or after March 1, 2008 through July
31, 2008.\8\ The text of the proposed rule change is available at Phlx,
the Commission's Public Reference Room, and at http://www.phlx.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ This proposal is scheduled to be in effect for the same time
period as fees for Linkage Principal (``P'') and P/A orders. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56166 (July 30, 2007), 72 FR
43312 (August 3, 2007) (SR-Phlx--2007-52).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,

the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to expand the
Exchange's current specialist option transaction charge credit pilot
program and to amend the Exchange's fee schedule to include all
customer orders that are delivered electronically by Phlx XL and
subsequently executed via Linkage as a P/A order. The Exchange options
specialist units incur a $0.21 per contract option transaction charge
when they execute against the customer order that corresponds with the
order that was delivered either through Phlx XL or Exchange's Options
Floor Broker Management System \9\ (``FBMS'') to the limit order book
and subsequently executed at another exchange via Linkage as a P/A
order. Currently, the Exchange provides for an option transaction
charge credit of $0.21 per contract for Exchange options specialist
units that incur Phlx option transaction charges when a customer order
is delivered to the limit order book via the FBMS and then is executed
via Linkage as a P/A Order.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ FBMS is designed to enable Floor Brokers and/or their
employees to enter, route and report transactions stemming from
options orders received on the Exchange. FBMS also is designed to
establish an electronic audit trail for options orders represented
and executed by Floor Brokers on the Exchange, such that the audit
trail provides an accurate, time-sequenced record of electronic and
other orders, quotations and transactions on the Exchange, beginning
with the receipt of an order by the Exchange, and further
documenting the life of the order through the process of execution,
partial execution, or cancellation of that order. See Exchange Rule
1080, Commentary .06.
    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56101 (July 19,
2007), 72 FR 40920 (July 25, 2007) (SR-Phlx-2007-50).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This proposal seeks to expand the $0.21 credit to include all
customer orders that are delivered electronically by Phlx XL, not just
FBMS orders, and that are subsequently executed via Linkage as a P/A
order.
    The purpose of this proposal is to help alleviate the potential
economic burden of multiple transaction charges imposed on Exchange
specialist units in connection with routing these types of Linkage
orders. The Exchange believes it is appropriate to assist specialist
units in offsetting some of the costs that they incur in routing orders
to other options exchanges in order to obtain the National Best Bid or
Offer. By expanding the option transaction charge credit to all
electronically delivered orders as described above, the Exchange should
remain competitive with other exchanges with respect to the assessment
of Linkage-related fees.
3. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,\11\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of
the Act,\12\ in particular, in that it is designed to provide for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among
Exchange members. The expanded $0.21 credit should help alleviate the
undue financial burden of multiple transaction charges that are
incurred by these specialist units in connection with P/A orders
executed via Linkage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \12\15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change is effective upon filing
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) \13\ of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(2) \14\ thereunder because it establishes or changes a due, fee,
or other charge applicable only to a member imposed by the Exchange. At
any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2008-19 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2008-19. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/
shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, on official business
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing will
also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of
the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-
2008-19 and should be submitted on or before April 2, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-4822 Filed 3-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGION 8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1595 Wynkoop Street
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Denver, CO   80202-1129
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.epa.gov/region8

Ref:  8P-AR

Kristy Hardtke
Director of Library Services
Central Wyoming College Library
2660 Peck Avenue
Riverton, Wyoming  82501

Dear Ms. Hardtke:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 is proposing to issue a synthetic minor permit for the Merit Energy Company (Merit), Steamboat Butte C1/C3 Tank Battery on the Wind River Indian Reservation. As requested by Merit, this permit is only intended to establish requested enforceable emissions restrictions for existing installed and operating emissions units and associated voluntarily installed and operated control devices. Merit requested legally and practicably enforceable requirements for the installation and operation of two flares to control the volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from produced natural gas from a heater treater separator and flashing, working and breathing loss emissions from crude oil storage tanks and produced water storage tanks. Merit has also requested to limit facility oil, produced water, natural gas throughput, and the sulfur content in flared gas, as hydrogen sulfide. This permit would not authorize the construction of any new emissions sources or emissions increases from existing units, nor would it otherwise authorize any other physical modifications to the facility or its operations. This permit is only intended to incorporate requested emission limits and provisions from the permit application for existing emissions units operating at the facility.

A public comment period for the proposed permit will begin on December 21, 2018, and end on January 22, 2019.

We have enclosed paper copies of the proposed permit and supporting documentation, and we ask that you please make this material available for public review until the end of the public comment period. Comments may be submitted via mail, via email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or through https://www.regulations.gov (Docket ID # EPA-R08-OAR-2018-0339). In addition, we have provided copies of the bulletin board public notice announcement and would appreciate it if you could post this announcement in prominent locations in your area. All of these documents will also be available for review in electronic format on our website at: https://www.epa.gov/caa-permitting/caa-permit-public-comment-opportunities-region-8.

If you have any questions concerning the enclosed proposed permit or technical support documents, please contact Christopher Razzazian, of my staff, at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

						Sincerely,

						Monica Morales
                              Director, Air Program
                                    Office of Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance

cc:	Vernon Hill, Chairman, Eastern Shoshone Tribe
    Roy Brown, Chairman, Northern Arapaho Tribe
    Dean Goggles, Environmental Director, Environmental Program, Northern Arapaho Tribe
    Ryan Ortiz, Director Natural Resources, Environmental Program, Northern Arapaho Tribe
    Phoebe Wilson, Administrative Assistance, Eastern Shoshone Business Council
    Michelle Koch, Regulatory and Government Affairs Professional, Merit Energy Company


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 174 (Thursday, September 8, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55566-55570]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22996]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0786]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zones; Fireworks Displays and Surfing Events in Captain of
the Port Long Island Sound Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing safety zones for marine events
within the Captain of the Port (COTP) Long Island Sound Zone for a
surfing event and fireworks displays. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during the events.
Entry into, transit through, mooring or anchoring within this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the COTP Sector Long Island Sound.

DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR on September 8, 2011 through 5
p.m. on September 15, 2011. This rule is effective with actual notice
for purposes of enforcement beginning at 8:30 p.m. on September 1,
2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0786 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0786 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary

rule, call or e-mail Petty Officer Joseph Graun, Prevention Department,
Coast Guard Sector Long Island Sound,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because any delay encountered in this
regulation's effective date by publishing an NPRM would be contrary to
public interest since immediate action is needed to protect both
spectators and participants from the potential safety hazards
associated with these events. We spoke to the event sponsors, and they
are unable and unwilling to move their event dates for the following
reasons.
    The sponsors for Quiksilver Pro New York, Surf competition stated
delaying the event is not an option because weather conditions later in
the year will not support competition size waves. This is the first
time this event will be held on the East Coast. The sponsors were not
aware of the requirements for submitting a marine event application 135
days in advance resulting in a late notification to the Coast Guard.
The sponsors are now aware of the reporting requirements.
    The sponsors for Stamford Fireworks and Village of Island Park
Labor Day Celebration Fireworks submitted a marine event application
with sufficient notice to the Coast Guard. These fireworks displays are
recurring marine events with a corresponding entry in a proposed
permanent rule for which the NPRM just closed its public comment period
(docket number USCG-2008-0384); no public comments were received. The
Coast Guard is establishing these temporary safety zones to provide for
safety of life during this year's events.
    For the same reasons under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the
effective date by first publishing a NPRM would be contrary to the
rule's objectives of ensuring safety of life on the navigable waters
during these scheduled events as immediate action is needed to protect
both spectators and participants from the potential safety hazards
associated with these events including collisions with surfers,
unexpected pyrotechnics detonation and burning debris.

Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for this temporary rule is 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46
U.S.C. chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1,
6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; and
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard to define regulatory safety
zones.
    This temporary rule establishes safety zones for fireworks displays
and a surfing event. Marine events are frequently held on the navigable
waters within the COTP Long Island Sound Zone. Based on accidents that
have occurred in the past and the explosive hazards of fireworks, the
COTP Long Island Sound has determined that surfing events and fireworks
displays proximate to watercrafts pose significant risk to public
safety and property.
    In order to protect the safety of all waterway users including
event participants and spectators, this temporary rule establishes
safety zones for the time and location of each event.

Discussion of Rule

    This temporary rule establishes safety zones for two fireworks
displays and one surfing event in the COTP Long Island Sound Zone.
These events are listed below in the text of the regulation in table
format.
    Because large numbers of spectator vessels are expected to
congregate around the location of these events, these regulated areas
are needed to protect both spectators and participants from the safety
hazards created by them including unexpected pyrotechnics detonation,
burning debris, and hazards inherent with surfing competitions.
    This rule prevents vessels from entering, transiting, mooring or
anchoring within areas specifically designated as regulated areas
during the periods of enforcement unless authorized by the COTP, or
designated representative.
    The Coast Guard determined that these regulated areas will not have
a significant impact on vessel traffic due to their temporary nature,
limited size, and the fact that vessels are allowed to transit the
navigable waters outside of the regulated areas. The COTP will cause
public notifications to be made by all appropriate means including but
not limited to the Local Notice to Mariners as well as Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it
under that Order.
    The Coast Guard determined that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action for the following reasons: The regulated areas will
be of limited duration and cover only a small portion of the navigable
waterways. Furthermore, vessels may transit the navigable waterways
outside of the regulated areas. Vessels requiring entry into the
regulated areas may be authorized to do so by the COTP or the
designated representative.
    Advance public notifications will also be made to the local
maritime community by the Local Notice to Mariners as well as Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in the designated regulated areas during the
enforcement periods stated for each

event listed below in the List of Subjects.
    The temporary safety zones will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following
reasons: The regulated areas will be of limited size and of short
duration, and vessels that can safely do so may navigate in all other
portions of the waterways except for the areas designated as regulated
areas. Additionally, before the effective period, notifications will be
made to the local maritime community by all appropriate means including
but not limited to the Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to
Mariners well in advance of the events.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of
safety zones. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T01-0786 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T01-0786  Safety Zones; Fireworks Displays and Surfing Events
in Captain of the Port Long Island Sound Zone

    (a) Regulations.
    The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23 as well as the
following regulations apply to the events listed in TABLE 1 of Sec.
165.T01-0786 and TABLE 2 of Sec.  165.T01-0786.
    These regulations will be enforced for the duration of each event.
    (b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
    (1) Designated Representative. A ``designated representative'' is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard who has been designated by the Captain of the Port, Sector
Long Island Sound (COTP), to act on his or her behalf. The designated
representative may be on an official patrol vessel or may be on shore
and will communicate with vessels via VHF-FM radio or loudhailer. In
addition, members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to inform
vessel operators of this regulation.
    (2) Official Patrol Vessels. Official patrol vessels may consist of
any Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law enforcement
vessels assigned or approved by the COTP.
    (3) Spectators. All persons and vessels not registered with the
event sponsor as participants or official patrol vessels.
    (c) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the
regulated areas should contact the COTP or the designated
representative via VHF channel 16 or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> to
obtain permission to do so.
    (d) Spectators shall not anchor, block, loiter, or impede the
transit of event participants or official patrol vessels in the
regulated areas during the effective dates and times, or dates and
times as modified through the Local Notice to Mariners, unless
authorized by COTP or designated representative.
    (e) The COTP or designated representative may delay or terminate
any marine event in this subpart at any time it is deemed necessary to
ensure the safety of life or property.
    (f) The regulated area for all fireworks displays listed in TABLE 1
of Sec.  165.T01-0786 is that area of navigable waters within a 1000
foot radius of the launch platform or launch site for each fireworks
display. Fireworks barges used in these locations will also have a sign
on their port and starboard side labeled ``FIREWORKS--STAY AWAY.'' This
sign will consist of 10 inch high by 1.5 inch wide red lettering on a
white background. Shore sites used in these locations will display a
sign labeled ``FIREWORKS--STAY AWAY'' with the same dimensions.
    (g) The regulated areas for all surfing events listed in Table 2 of
Sec.  165.T01-0786 are all navigable waters within a 100 yard radius of
surfing participants and support vessels within the location area.

                     Table 1 of Sec.   165.T01-0786
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            Fireworks Events
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Stamford Fireworks..............   Date: September 1, 2011.
                                     Time: 8:30 p.m. to 10:30
                                     p.m.
                                     Location: All waters of
                                     Stamford Harbor, Stamford, CT in
                                     approximate position
                                     41[deg]1'48.464'' N,
                                     073[deg]32'15.316'' W (NAD 83).
2 Village of Island Park Labor Day   Date: September 3, 2011.
 Celebration Fireworks.              Time: 8:30 p.m. to 10:30
                                     p.m.
                                     Location: Waters off
                                     Village of Island Park Fishing
                                     Pier, Village Beach, NY in
                                     approximate position
                                     40[deg]36'30.95'' N,
                                     073[deg]39'22.23'' W (NAD 83).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                     Table 2 of Sec.   165.T01-0786
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Surfing Events
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Quiksilver Pro New York, Surf      Effective dates: September
 competition.                        4-15, 2011.
                                     Enforcement dates: 4 days
                                     to be determined by weather.
                                     Notification: Broad.
                                     Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
                                     Locations: All waters of
                                     the Atlantic Ocean within 150 yards
                                     of each beach listed below, Long
                                     Beach, NY.
                                     National Beach: Approximate
                                     positions, beach begins
                                     40[deg]34'58.961'' N,
                                     073[deg]40'10.236'' W beach ends
                                     40[deg]34'58.961'' N,
                                     073[deg]39'59.962'' W.
                                     Lincoln Beach: Approximate
                                     positions, beach begins
                                     40[deg]34'56.647'' N,
                                     073[deg]39'18.982'' W beach ends
                                     40[deg]34'56.647'' N,
                                     073[deg]39'8.668'' W.
                                     Laurelton Beach:
                                     Approximate positions, beach begins
                                     40[deg]34'59.344'' N,
                                     073[deg]40'31.962'' W beach ends
                                     40[deg]34'59.344'' N,
                                     073[deg]40'31.789'' W.
                                     Pacific Beach: Approximate
                                     positions, beach begins
                                     40[deg]34'56.733'' N,
                                     073[deg]38'37.385'' W beach ends
                                     40[deg]34'56.733'' N,
                                     073[deg]38'26.491'' W.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: August 19, 2011.
J.M. Vojvodich,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Long Island
Sound.
[FR Doc. 2011-22996 Filed 9-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P