[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 143 (Thursday, July 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48482-48483]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15874]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2023-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2355]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before October 25, 2023.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2355, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email) patrick.sa[email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit

the FEMA Mapping and Insurance eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be
identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date
listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Nicholas A. Shufro,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Baraga County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)
  Project: 16-05-2942S Preliminary Date: April 22, 2022 and January 05,
                                  2023
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community L'Anse     Keweenaw Bay Tribal Center,
 Reservation.                             16429 Beartown Road, Baraga,
                                          MI 49908.
Township of Arvon......................  Skanee Town Hall, 20986 Park
                                          Road, Skanee, MI 49962.
Township of Baraga.....................  Baraga Township Building, 325
                                          Lyons Street, Baraga, MI
                                          49908.
Township of Covington..................  Township Multi-Purpose
                                          Building, 12898 Highway M28,
                                          Covington, MI 49919.
Township of L'Anse.....................  Township Hall, 126 North Main
                                          Street, L'Anse, MI 49946.
Village of Baraga......................  Village Hall, 100 Hemlock
                                          Street, Baraga, MI 49908.
Village of L'Anse......................  Village Hall, 101 North Main
                                          Street, L'Anse, MI 49946.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2023-15874 Filed 7-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-13-P


[Federal Register: July 17, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 138)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 40951-40953]
[DOCID:fr17jy08-3]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0543 Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-092-AD;
Amendment 39-15607; AD 2008-14-12]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Pacific Aerospace Limited Model FU-24
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    To prevent the possible in-flight failure of the vertical fin,
leading to loss of control of the aircraft * * *

We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective August 21, 2008.
    On August 21, 2008, the Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this
AD.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov or in person at Document Management Facility, U.S.

Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on May 13, 2008 (73 FR
27479). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    To prevent the possible in-flight failure of the vertical fin,
leading to loss of control of the aircraft * * *

The MCAI requires inspections of the vertical fin for cracking,
corrosion, scratches, dents, creases, and/or buckling and the repair of
any damaged area.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will
affect 2 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take
about 1 work-hour per product to comply with basic requirements of this
AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S.
operators to be $160 or $80 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 24 work-hours and require parts costing $1,000, for a cost
of $2,920 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
Requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2008-14-12 Pacific Aerospace Corporation, Ltd: Amendment 39-15607;
Docket No. FAA-2008-0543; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-092-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August
21, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to FU-24 airplanes, all serial numbers,
certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 53:
Fuselage.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    To prevent the possible in-flight failure of the vertical fin,
leading to loss of control of the aircraft * * *

The MCAI requires inspections of the vertical fin for cracking,
corrosion, scratches, dents, creases, and/or buckling and the repair
of any damaged area.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, after August 21, 2008 (the effective
date of this AD), do the following actions following Chapter 05,
page 25 of the FU-24-950 Series Maintenance Manual:
    (1) Before the first flight of each day, visually inspect the
vertical stabilizer leading

edge skin and fin for any cracking, corrosion, scratches, dents,
creases, and/or buckling and repair as necessary. All non-
transparent protective coatings and their adhesive must be removed
for this inspection.
    (2) Within 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) after August 21, 2008
(the effective date of this AD), and repetitively thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 100 hours TIS, perform a detailed inspection
of the vertical stabilizer leading edge skin, leading edge, fin
skin, and the fin forward attachment point for any cracking,
corrosion, scratches, dents, creases, and/or buckling to include:
    (i) Inspection of the entire leading edge down to the forward
attach fitting and removal of dorsal fin extensions if installed in
order to inspect the obscured areas of the fin.
    (ii) Inspection of the fin skin for corrosion and cracks, paying
particular attention to the center rib rivet holes and the skin
joint at the fin base.
    (iii) Inspection of the fin forward attachment point for
corrosion, removal of the fin tip, and inspection of the top rib for
cracks at the skin stiffener cutouts.
    (3) If any damage is found during any inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD, before further flight, obtain
an FAA-approved repair scheme from the manufacturer and incorporate
that repair.
    (4) The following transparent polyurethane protective tapes have
been assessed as suitable for use to re-protect the leading edge and
may remain in situ for subsequent inspections, provided they are
sound and in a condition to permit visual inspection of the skin
beneath them:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Manufacturer                            Product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) 3M............................  8591, or 8671, 8672 and 8681HS
                                     (aeronautical grade).
(ii) Scapa........................  Aeroshield P2604 (transparent).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Note 1: You may apply for an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) for an alternative to the transparent polyurethane protective
tapes listed above.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
    (1) The inspections required in this AD must be performed by a
person authorized under 14 CFR part 43 to perform inspections, as
opposed to the MCAI, which allows the holder of a pilot license to
perform the inspections.
    (2) The 50-hour inspection required in the MCAI goes away
because the ``before the first flight of each day'' inspection
captures the intent.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand AD
DCA/FU24/176C, dated September 27, 2007, for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use Chapter 05, page 25 of the FU-24-950 Series
Maintenance Manual, issued December 1978, to do the actions required
by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Pacific Aerospace Limited, Hamilton Airport, Private Bag, 3027
Hamilton, New Zealand; telephone: +64 7-843-6144; facsimile: +64 7-
843-6134.
    (3) You may review copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-
register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 30, 2008.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-16191 Filed 7-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 80 (Friday, April 25, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22916-22919]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09358]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2014-0180]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Arts Project Cherry Grove Pride Week Fireworks
Display, Great South Bay; Cherry Grove, Fire Island, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
on the navigable waters of Great South Bay near Cherry Grove, Fire
Island, NY for the Arts Project Cherry Grove Pride Week fireworks
display. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the event. The safety zone will facilitate
public notification of the event and provide protective measures for
the maritime public and event participants from the hazards associated
with the fireworks display. Entering into, transiting through,
remaining, anchoring or mooring within this regulated area would be
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Sector
Long Island Sound.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 27, 2014.
    Requests for public meetings must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 2, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Scott Baumgartner, Prevention Department,
Coast Guard Sector Long Island Sound,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2014-0180] in

the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment''
on the line associated with this rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2014-0180) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES on
or before May 2, 2014 Please explain why you believe a public meeting
would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.

B. Regulatory History and Information

    This is a first time event with no regulatory history. However,
there is an annually recurring event, the Arts Project Cherry Grove
fireworks display held in the same location on a single day during the
first two weeks of June. The safety zone established for that recurring
event was part of the final rule entitled, ``Safety Zones and Special
Local Regulations; Recurring Marine Events in Captain of the Port
Sector Long Island Sound Zone'' that was published on May 24, 2013 in
the Federal Register (78 FR 31406).

C. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for this temporary rule is 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46
U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1,
6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1 which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard to define regulatory safety
zones.
    This temporary rule is necessary to promote the safety of life on
navigable waterways during the Arts Project Cherry Grove Pride Week
fireworks display in Great South Bay near Cherry Grove, Fire Island,
NY.

D. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    This temporary rule proposes to establish a safety zone for the
Arts Project Cherry Grove Pride Week fireworks display. This proposed
regulated area includes all waters of Great South Bay within a 600 foot
radius of the fireworks barge located approximately 400 yards north of
the main dock in Cherry Grove, Fire Island, NY.
    This rule will be effective from 8:30 p.m. on June 28, 2014 through
10:30 p.m. on June 29, 2014.
    The fireworks display is scheduled to occur and this regulation
will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. on June 28, 2014. If
the event is cancelled due to inclement weather, then this regulation
will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. on June 29, 2014.
    Because spectator vessels are expected to congregate around the
location of the fireworks display, this regulated area is necessary to
protect both spectators and participants from the hazards created by
unexpected pyrotechnics detonation, and burning debris. This proposed
rule would temporarily establish a regulated area to restrict vessel
movement on the navigable waters around the location of the fireworks
display to reduce the safety risks associated with it.
    Public notifications may be made to the local maritime community
prior to the event through the Local Notice to Mariners, and Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.

E. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    The Coast Guard determined that this rulemaking would not be a
significant regulatory action for the following reasons: The regulated
area will be of limited duration, the area covers only a small portion
of the navigable waterways and waterway users may transit around the
area. Also, mariners may request permission from the COTP Sector Long
Island Sound or the designated representative to transit the zone.
    Advanced public notifications will also be made to the local
maritime community through the Local Notice to Mariners as well as
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to enter,
transit, anchor or moor within the regulated area during the effective
period. The temporary safety zone will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following
reasons: The regulated area will be of limited size and of short
duration and mariners may request permission from the COTP Sector Long
Island Sound or the designated representative to transit the zone.
Notifications will be made to the maritime community through the Local

Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners well in advance of
the event.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves establishing a safety zone. This rule may be categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREA AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T01-0180 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T01-0180  Safety Zone; Arts Project Cherry Grove Pride Week
Fireworks Display; Great South Bay; Cherry Grove, Fire Island, NY

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
Great South Bay within a 600-foot radius of the fireworks barge located
about 400 yards north of the main dock at Cherry Grove, Fire Island, NY
in approximate position 40[deg]39'49.06'' N, 073[deg]05'27.99'' W North
American Datum 1983.
    (b) Enforcement Period. This rule will be enforced on June 28, 2014
from 8:30 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. If the event is postponed due to
inclement weather, then this rule will be enforced on June 29, 2014
from 8:30 p.m. until 10:30 p.m.
    (c) Regulations. The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23
apply. During the enforcement period, entering into, transiting
through, remaining, mooring or anchoring within

this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port (COTP) or the designated representatives.
    (1) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
    (i) Designated Representative. A ``designated representative'' is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard who has been designated by the COTP, Sector Long Island
Sound, to act on his or her behalf. The designated representative may
be on an official patrol vessel or may be on shore and will communicate
with vessels via VHF-FM radio or loudhailer. In addition, members of
the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to inform vessel operators of
this regulation.
    (ii) Official Patrol Vessels. Official patrol vessels may consist
of any Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law
enforcement vessels assigned or approved by the COTP Sector Long Island
Sound.
    (iii) Spectators. All persons and vessels not registered with the
event sponsor as participants or official patrol vessels.
    (2) Spectators desiring to enter or operate within the regulated
area should contact the COTP Sector Long Island Sound at<PHONE_NUMBER>
(Sector Long Island Sound command center) or the designated
representative via VHF channel 16 to obtain permission to do so.
Spectators given permission to enter or operate in the regulated area
must comply with all directions given to them by the COTP Sector Long
Island Sound or the designated on-scene representative.
    (3) Upon being hailed by an official patrol vessel or the
designated representative, by siren, radio, flashing light or other
means, the operator of the vessel shall proceed as directed. Failure to
comply with a lawful direction may result in expulsion from the area,
citation for failure to comply, or both.
    (4) Fireworks barges used in this location will have a sign on
their port and starboard side labeled ``FIREWORKS--STAY AWAY''. This
sign will consist of 10 inch high by 1.5 inch wide red lettering on a
white background.

    Dated: April 8, 2014.
E. J. Cubanski, III,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Long Island
Sound.
[FR Doc. 2014-09358 Filed 4-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 33 (Thursday, February 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9341]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3623]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Project No. 1494-391]

Grand River Dam Authority; Notice of Application Accepted for
Filing, Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Types of Application: Non-Project Use and Occupancy of Project
Lands.
    b. Project No.: 1494-391.
    c. Date Filed: January 7, 2011.
    d. Applicant: Grand River Dam Authority (GRDA).
    e. Name of Project: Pensacola Project.
    f. Location: Grand (Neosho) River in Craig, Delaware, Mayes, and
Ottawa Counties, Oklahoma.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 USC 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Tamara E. Jahnke, Assistant General Counsel,
Grand River Dam Authority, P.O. Box 409, Vinita, OK 74301; 918-256-
5545<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: Dr. Mark Ivy,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and
protests, is 30 days from the issuance date of this notice. All
documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. If unable to be filed
electronically, documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an
original and seven copies should be mailed to: Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters,
without prior registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and
contact information at the end of your comments.
    Please include the project number (P-1494-391) on any comments,
motions, or recommendations filed.
    k. Description of Request: Grand River Dam Authority, licensee for
the Pensacola Project, proposes to permit Colonial Center, LP to add a
dock with 14 boat slips to an existing marina located in Ketchum Cove
on Grand Lake 0' the Cherokees, Mayes County. The additional slips
require waivers of GRDA's 125 foot rule and parallel slip rule.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in
the docket number field to access the document. You may also register
online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be
notified via e-mail of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208- 3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item
(h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filing must (1)
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or
``MOTION TO INTERVENE'' as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise
comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, motions to intervene, or protests must set forth their
evidentiary basis and otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR
4.34(b). All comments, motions to intervene, or protests should relate
to project works which are the subject of the license surrender.
Agencies may obtain copies of the application directly from the
applicant. A copy of any protest or motion to intervene must be served
upon each representative of the applicant specified in the particular
application. If an intervener files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency. A copy of all other
filings in reference to this application must be accompanied by proof
of service on all persons listed in the service list prepared by the
Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and
385.2010.

    Dated: February 10, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-3623 Filed 2-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 142 (Monday, July 25, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48372-48373]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17292]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0817; FRL-9949-45-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS98

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the
Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
amend the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry. In the ``Rules and
Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, we are publishing a
direct final rule, without a prior proposed rule, that corrects an
inadvertent error and temporarily revises the testing and monitoring
requirements for hydrochloric acid (HCl) due to the current
unavailability of a calibration gas used for quality assurance
purposes. If we receive no adverse comment, we will not take further
action on this proposed rule.

DATES: Written comments must be received by August 24, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-

OAR-2011-0817, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once
submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The EPA may publish
any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, Cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sharon Nizich, Sector Policies and
Programs Division (D243-02), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; and email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Why is the EPA issuing this proposed rule?

    This document proposes to take action on amendments to the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Pollutants for the Portland Cement
Manufacturing Industry. We have published a direct final rule to amend
40 CFR part 63, subpart LLL by correcting an inadvertent error and
revising the testing and monitoring requirements for HCl in the ``Rules
and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register because we view this
as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment. We have
explained our reasons for this action in the preamble to the direct
final rule.
    If we receive no adverse comment, we will not take further action
on this proposed rule. If we receive adverse comment on a distinct
portion of the direct final rule, we will withdraw that portion of the
rule and it will not take effect. In this instance, we would address
all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on this proposed
rule.
    If we receive adverse comment on a distinct provision of the direct
final rule, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register
indicating which provisions we are withdrawing. The provisions that are
not withdrawn will become effective on the date set out in the direct
final rule, notwithstanding adverse comment on any other provision. We
do not intend to institute a second comment period on this action. Any
parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
    The regulatory text for this proposal is identical to that for the
direct final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of
this Federal Register. For further supplementary information, the
detailed rationale for this proposal and the regulatory revisions, see
the direct final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations''
section of this Federal Register.

II. Does this action apply to me?

    Categories and entities potentially regulated by this proposed rule
include:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  NAICS
                            Category                               Code
                                                                   \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Portland cement manufacturing facilities.......................   327310
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System.

    This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this
proposed rule. To determine whether your facility is affected, you
should examine the applicability criteria in 40 CFR 63.1340. If you
have any questions regarding the applicability of any aspect of this
this action to a particular entity, consult either the air permitting
authority for the entity or your EPA Regional representative as listed
in 40 CFR 63.13.

III. Statutory and Executive Orders

    For a complete discussion of the administrative requirements
applicable to this action, see the direct final rule in the ``Rules and
Regulations'' section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: July 14, 2016.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016-17292 Filed 7-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 9, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21548-21549]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09359]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2017-0013; OMB No. 1660-0072]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Mitigation Grant Programs/e-Grants

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites
the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity
to comment on a revision of a currently approved information
collection. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
this notice seeks comments concerning the collection of information
necessary to implement grants for the Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA)
program and the Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) program.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 10, 2017.

ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate submissions to the docket, please use
only one of the following means to submit comments:
    (1) Online. Submit comments at www.regulations.gov under Docket ID
FEMA-2017-0013. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    (2) Mail. Submit written comments to Docket Manager, Office of
Chief Counsel, DHS/FEMA, 500 C Street SW., 8NE, Washington, DC 20472-
3100.
    All submissions received must include the agency name and Docket
ID. Regardless of the method used for submitting comments or material,
all submissions will be posted, without change, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov, and will include any
personal information you provide. Therefore, submitting this
information makes it public. You may wish to read the Privacy Act
notice that is available via the link in the footer of
www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennie Orenstein, Branch Chief, HMA
Division--Grants Policy,<PHONE_NUMBER>. You may contact the Records
Management Division for copies of the proposed collection of
information at email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FMA program is authorized by Section
1366 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
4104c. The FMA program, under 44 CFR part 79, provides funding for
measures taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk of flood
damage to buildings, manufactured homes, and other structures insured
under the National Flood Insurance Program. The Biggert-Waters Flood
Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-141) eliminated the
Repetitive Flood Claims (RFC) and Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL)
programs, and made significant changes to the FMA program by
consolidating the former RFC and SRL programs into FMA. Cost-share
requirements were changed to allow more Federal funds for properties
with repetitive flood claims.
    The PDM program is authorized by Section 203 of the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5133,
as amended by Section 102 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000,
Public Law 106-390, 114 Stat. 1553. It provides grants for cost-
effective mitigation actions prior to a disaster event to reduce
overall risks to the population and structures, while also reducing
reliance on funding from actual disaster declarations.
    In accordance with OMB Circular A-102, FEMA requires that all
parties interested in receiving FEMA mitigation grants submit an
application package for grant assistance. Applications and
subapplications for the PDM and FMA programs are submitted via the e-
Grants system. The e-Grants system was developed and updated to meet
the intent of the e-Government initiative, authorized by Public Law
106-107. This initiative required that all government agencies both
streamline grant application processes and provide for the means to
electronically create, review, and submit a grant application via the
Internet. Title 2 CFR 200.335, promulgated in 2013, encourages Federal
awarding agencies and non-Federal entities to, whenever practicable,
collect, transmit, and store Federal award-related information in open
and machine readable formats rather than in closed formats or on paper.
    FEMA is proposing to add a new form to this collection to better
provide customer-centric clarity and uniformity in the way FEMA
collects information on the progress of FMA/PDM-funded hazard
mitigation projects. The new ``Non-Disaster Quarterly Progress Report''
form will replace the obsolete SF-425. Title 2 CFR 200.328 authorizes
the collection of information on the progress of activities conducted
under Federal awards.

Collection of Information

    Title: Mitigation Grant Programs/e-Grants.
    Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-0072.
    FEMA Forms: A FEMA Form number for the new Non-Disaster Quarterly
Progress Report form is currently pending.
    Abstract: FEMA's Flood Mitigation Assistance and Pre-Disaster
Mitigation programs utilize an automated grant application and
management system called e-Grants. These grant programs provide funding
for the purpose of reducing or eliminating the risks to life and
property from hazards. The e-Grants system includes all of the
application information needed to apply for funding under these grant
programs.
    Affected Public: State, local or Tribal government.
    Number of Respondents: 56.
    Number of Responses: 4,200.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 18,088.
    Estimated Cost: The estimated annual cost to respondents is
$893,366. The estimated annual cost to the Federal government is
$6,598,456.16. There are no annual recordkeeping, capital, start-up, or
operation and maintenance costs to respondents associated with this
collection of information.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

William H. Holzerland,
Senior Director for Information Management, Office of the Chief
Administrative Officer Mission Support, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2017-09359 Filed 5-8-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-52-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 1, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77204-77205]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26447]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]

Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice

    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of
the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission
decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-
the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested
proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of
the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any
oral communication.
    Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional
file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional record of the
proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited
communication and any responses thereto should become a part of the
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication and may
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant
such a request only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any
person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with
Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
    Exempt off-the-record communications are included in the decisional
record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
    The following is a list of off-the-record communications recently
received by the Secretary of the Commission. The communications listed
are grouped by docket numbers in ascending order. These filings are
available for electronic review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits, in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Docket No.                File date    Presenter or requester
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Prohibited
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              NONE
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Exempt
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. P-10853-022..................      11-12-2020  FERC Staff. \1\
2. CP20-50-000..................      11-16-2020  FERC Staff. \2\

3. P-10853-022..................      11-19-2020  FERC Staff. \3\
4. CP16-9-000...................      11-19-2020  U.S. Senate. \4\
5. CP15-558-000, CP19-78-000,         11-19-2020  New Jersey Department
 CP20-47-000.                                      of Environmental
                                                   Protection.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Memo dated 11/10/20 forwarding U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
  updated list of threatened, endangered, candidate, and proposed
  species.
\2\ Memo dated 11/10/2020 forwarding the National Marine Fisheries
  Service's comments.
\3\ Memo dated 11/18/20 regarding the conference call with
  representatives from Otter Tail Power Company and the Kleinschmidt
  Group.
\4\ U.S. Senators Edward J. Markey and Elizabeth Warren.

    Dated: November 24, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-26447 Filed 11-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P