PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request: US EPA, OECA, Agricultural and Ecosystem div. 2. OMB control number b. G None a__ 2 0 6 0 _  _ 0 0 3 7 __ __ __ __ __

3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. G New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. X Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. X Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. X Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title NSPS for Phosphate Fertilizer Industry, 40 CFR Part 60, Subparts T, U, V, W, and X 8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) EPA ICR No. 1061.08 9. Keywords Environmental Protection, Air Pollution 10. Abstract This regulation applies to owners and operators of phosphate fertilizer production and storage facilities. Owners and operators must conduct an initial performance test, record amount of feed material and storage, record pressure drop across control devices, and comply with a total fluoride emission standard.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. G Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. P Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 11 b. Total annual responses 11 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically % c. Total annual hours requested 963 d. Current OMB inventory 963 e. Difference 0 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 2. Adjustment 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) 0 c. Total annualized cost requested d. Current OMB inventory 0 e. Difference 0 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change 2. Adjustment 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. P _ Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. X Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. X Reporting 1. X On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. Q Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biennually 8. Q Other ( describe)

17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes X No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Stephen J. Howie Phone: 202 564 4146 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( i) Why the information is being collected; ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

( c) This collection activity does not affect small businesses ( i) This collection activity does not employ statistical methods Signature of Program Office Official Rick Colbert, Director Agricultural and Ecosystem Division Office of Compliance ( OECA) Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Environmental Information ( OEI) Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95 Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions 5 CFR 1320.9 reads " As part of the agency submission to OMB of a proposed collection of information, the agency ( through the head of the agency, the Senior Official or their designee) shall certify ( and provide a record supporting such certification) that the proposed collection of information

"( a) is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including that the information to be collected will have practical utility;

"( b) is not unnecessarily duplicative of information otherwise reasonably accessible to the agency;

"( c) reduces to the extent practicable and appropriate the burden on persons who shall provide information to or for the agency, including with respect to small entities, as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U. S. C § 601( 6)), the use of such techniques as:

"( 1) establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to those who are to respond; "( 2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements; or collection of information , or any part thereof; "( 3) an exemption from coverage of the collection of information, or any part thereof;

"( d) is written using plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology and is understandable to those who are to respond;

"( e) is to be implemented in ways consistent and compatible, to the maximum extent practicable, with the existing reporting and recordkeeping practices of those who are to respond;

"( f) indicates for each recordkeeping requirement the length of time persons are required to maintain the records specified;

"( g) informs potential respondents of the information called for under § 1320.8( b)( 3); [ see below]

"( h) has been developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected, including the processing of the information in a manner which shall enhance, where appropriate, the utility of the information to agencies and the public;

"( i) uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology appropriate to the purpose for which the information is to be collected; and "( j) to the maximum extent practicable, uses appropriate information technology to reduce burden and improve data quality, agency efficiency and responsiveness to the public."

NOTE: 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3) requires that each collection of information:

"( 3) informs and provides reasonable notice to the potential persons to whom the collection of information is addressed of: "( i) the reasons the information is planned to be and/ or has been collected; "( ii) the way such information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( iii) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the average burden of the collection ( together with a request that the public direct to the agency any comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden); "( iv) whether responses to the collection of information are voluntary, required to obtain or retain a benefit ( citing authority), or mandatory ( citing authority); "( v) the nature and extent of confidentiality to be provided, if any ( citing authority); and "( vi) the fact that any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number."

10/ 95


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Aloha Mr. Zeller:

I am writing as an individual consumer to request an extension of the comment period for the Food and Drug Administration's ("FDA") Proposed Rule Deeming Tobacco Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking and Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the "Proposed Rule") published at 79 Fed. Reg. 23,142 and Federal Register No. 2014-09491. On behalf of myself, I am requesting that the comment period for the Proposed Rule be extended by the FDA for an additional 105 days, from its current 75-day period, to 180 days.

The Proposed Rule raises a number of significant issues and questions that are important and relevant to me, as a consumer of products that are proposed for regulation under the Proposed Rule. The Proposed Rule asks about a hundred different questions I might want to respond to. I want to provide my thoughts and comments on many of these issues, but my time to devote to researching and providing thoughtful comments on these important questions is limited. I have already spent many hours researching and dissecting these issues, but they take time. I know that the FDA took many years to even come up with the Proposed Rule, so I do not think it is at all unreasonable to allow the public a mere six months to comment on it. This is our only opportunity, as consumers, to provide our feedback.

I feel very strongly about e-cigarettes as an alternative to combustible cigarettes. Quite simply, I firmly believe that they saved my life and have affected my family and those around me in a positive , and healthy way. I wish to provide you with my personal story, as well as science- and evidence-based responses to your questions so that you can take my comment into account. I realize that the FDA has the authority under 21 CFR 10.40 to extend this time frame and that the FDA has exercised this authority on numerous occasions in the past. I would therefore ask that you do so here, so that all stakeholders have the opportunity to provide their comments on this proposed regulation.

I appreciate your consideration of my request and am happy to discuss this issue with you further.

Thank you, David Hayashi


ATTACHMENT D:

Load Calculations in TWPE Calculated Loads for Stand Alone Chlor alkali Facilities PPGWV OCTFLA Total Facility Code Key 2378TCDD    DF Dow, Freeport, TX 12378PeCDD 16,239  16,238.92 DP Dow, Plaquemine, LA 123478HxCDD    PPGLC PPG, Lake Charles, LA 123678HxCDD    PPGWV PPG, Natrium, WV 123789HxCDD    GGP Georgia Gulf, Plaquemine, LA 1234678HpCDD 6,039 123.33 6,162.25 OCDPTX Oxyvinyls, Deer Park, TX OCDD 10,344 91.39 10,435.61 OCBGTX Oxyvinyls, LaPorte, TX ( Battleground Plant)

2378TCDF 1,775 2,867.17 4,642.14 OCLPTX Oxyvinyls, LaPorte, TX 12378PeCDF 3,101 6,546.67 9,647.41 OCINGTX Occidental, Ingleside, TX 23478PeCDF 73,856 62,095.02 135,950.76 OCTFLA Occidental, Taft, LA 123478HxCDF 10,700 43,676.09 54,376.04 123678HxCDF 3,321 17,400.25 20,721.65 234678HxCDF  9,325.63 9,325.63 123789HxCDF  8,860.17 8,860.17 1234678HpCDF 388 6,588.33 6,976.29 1234789HpCDF  1,017.86 1,017.86 OCDF 326 261.45 587.47 Total 126,088.83 158,853.35 284,942.19 Calculated Loads for Integrated Chlor alkali and Vinyl Facilities DF DP PPGLC GGP OCDPTX OCBGTX /

OCLPTX OCINGTX Total 2378TCDD CBI CBI  CBI    40,243.32 12378PeCDD CBI CBI  CBI    165,986.51 123478HxCDD CBI CBI 128.86 CBI  1.98  167,179.21 123678HxCDD CBI CBI  CBI  4.55  420.32 123789HxCDD CBI CBI  CBI  4.33  82,112.89 1234678HpCDD CBI CBI 1,834.77 CBI 6,546.46 72.91 516.86 163,492.78 OCDD CBI CBI 1,750.58 CBI 15,578.20 352.43 596.04 85,306.16 2378TCDF CBI CBI 10,031.83 CBI 7,544.17 1.83  56,076.24 12378PeCDF CBI CBI 16,857.91 CBI 6,442.87 22.99  48,999.53 23478PeCDF CBI CBI 139,878.69 CBI 16,322.07 17.61  364,544.78 123478HxCDF CBI CBI 46,942.39 CBI 22,039.04 100.79  475,824.68 123678HxCDF CBI CBI 17,184.96 CBI 3,191.20 77.30  20,782.01 234678HxCDF CBI CBI 17,954.66 CBI  54.06  97,249.43 123789HxCDF CBI CBI 10,633.16 CBI  1.09  28,311.82 1234678HpCDF CBI CBI 4,303.29 CBI 676.57 61.16 880.34 202,434.65 1234789HpCDF CBI CBI 1,866.32 CBI 20.36 12.70 196.18 30,215.02 OCDF CBI CBI 1,314.70 CBI 512.21 149.43 344.76 50,652.26 Total CBI CBI 270,682.11 CBI 78,873.14 935.17 2,534.18 2,079,831.61 Summary ATTACHMENT D Load Calculations in TWPE Dow, Freeport, TX Concentrations and Flows DF2 TWF Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ppq Conc ppq Conc ppq 2378TCDD 421,600,000 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 12378PeCDD 215,384,615 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123478HxCDD 43,076,923 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123678HxCDD 41,791,045 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123789HxCDD 43,076,923 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI OCDD 423,510 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 2378TCDF 6,696,140 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 12378PeCDF 3,294,118 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 23478PeCDF 32,941,176 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123478HxCDF 6,658,740 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123678HxCDF 6,666,667 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 234678HxCDF 6,666,667 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123789HxCDF 6,658,740 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 1234678HpCDF 665,874 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 1234789HpCDF 666,667 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI OCDF 67,367 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI Flow ( MGD) CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI Date 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 Stream Name Outfall 102 Outfall 102 Outfall 102 Outfall 701 Outfall 701 Outfall 701 Outfall 202 Outfall 202 Outfall 202 Load Calculations TWF 2001 2002 2003 erage Annual L 2001 2002 2003 verage Annual Lo 2001 2002 2003 erage Annual Lo 2378TCDD 421,600,000 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 12378PeCDD 215,384,615 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123478HxCDD 43,076,923 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123678HxCDD 41,791,045 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123789HxCDD 43,076,923 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI OCDD 423,510 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 2378TCDF 6,696,140 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 12378PeCDF 3,294,118 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 23478PeCDF 32,941,176 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123478HxCDF 6,658,740 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123678HxCDF 6,666,667 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 234678HxCDF 6,666,667 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123789HxCDF 6,658,740 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 1234678HpCDF 665,874 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 1234789HpCDF 666,667 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI OCDF 67,367 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI Total Facility Load Chlor alkali Chlor alkali Vinyl Vinyl DF1 DF 1 DF 2 DF ATTACHMENT D:

Load Calculations in TWPE Dow, Plaquemine Concentrations and Flows TWF Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ppq Conc ppq Conc ppq 2378TCDD 421,600,000 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 12378PeCDD 215,384,615 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123478HxCDD 43,076,923 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123678HxCDD 41,791,045 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123789HxCDD 43,076,923 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI OCDD 423,510 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 2378TCDF 6,696,140 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 12378PeCDF 3,294,118 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 23478PeCDF 32,941,176 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123478HxCDF 6,658,740 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123678HxCDF 6,666,667 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 234678HxCDF 6,666,667 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123789HxCDF 6,658,740 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 1234678HpCDF 665,874 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 1234789HpCDF 666,667 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI OCDF 67,367 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI Flow ( MGD) CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI Date 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 Stream Name Outfall 301 Outfall 301 Outfall 301 Outfall 2001 Outfall 2001 Outfall 2001 Load Calculations TWF 2001 2002 2003 verage Annual Lo 2001 2002 2003 verage Annual Loa 2378TCDD 421,600,000 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 12378PeCDD 215,384,615 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123478HxCDD 43,076,923 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123678HxCDD 41,791,045 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123789HxCDD 43,076,923 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI OCDD 423,510 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 2378TCDF 6,696,140 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 12378PeCDF 3,294,118 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 23478PeCDF 32,941,176 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123478HxCDF 6,658,740 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123678HxCDF 6,666,667 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 234678HxCDF 6,666,667 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 123789HxCDF 6,658,740 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 1234678HpCDF 665,874 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 1234789HpCDF 666,667 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI OCDF 67,367 CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI Total Facility Load Chlor alkali Vinyl Chlor alkali Vinyl DP ATTACHMENT D: Load Calculations in TWPE PPG, Lake Charles, LA Concentrations and Flows CA/ Vinyl TWF Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) 2378TCDD 421,600,000 0 0 0 12378PeCDD 215,384,615 0 0 0 123478HxCDD 43,076,923 0 19.6 0 123678HxCDD 41,791,045 0 0 0 123789HxCDD 43,076,923 0 0 0 1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 0 75.1 12.1 OCDD 423,510 55.7 696 99.9 2378TCDF 6,696,140 9.8 4.9 39.9 12378PeCDF 3,294,118 10.7 28 142 23478PeCDF 32,941,176 11.8 43.3 117 123478HxCDF 6,658,740 30.9 393 190 123678HxCDF 6,666,667 8.31 104 70.4 234678HxCDF 6,666,667 13.7 82.2 72.4 123789HxCDF 6,658,740 5.9 0 43.7 1234678HpCDF 665,874 21.9 1240 172 1234789HpCDF 666,667 14.6 425 73.7 OCDF 67,367 56.3 10200 494 Flow ( MGD) 2.93 0.0501 11.6 Date 3/ 20/ 02 2/ 28/ 02 Stream Name Outfall 101.1 Outfall 101.4 Load Calculations TWF Outfall 101.1 Outfall 101.4 Total 2378TCDD 421,600,000   0   12378PeCDD 215,384,615   0   123478HxCDD 43,076,923  128.86 128.8563  128.86 123678HxCDD 41,791,045   0   123789HxCDD 43,076,923   0   1234678HpCDD 4,179,104  47.90 47.8992 1,786.87 1,834.77 OCDD 423,510 210.55 44.99 255.5356 1,495.05 1,750.58 2378TCDF 6,696,140 585.71 5.01 590.7215 9,441.10 10,031.83 12378PeCDF 3,294,118 314.60 14.08 328.6761 16,529.24 16,857.91 23478PeCDF 32,941,176 3,469.41 217.69 3687.1 136,191.59 139,878.69 123478HxCDF 6,658,740 1,836.48 399.38 2235.86 44,706.53 46,942.39 123678HxCDF 6,666,667 494.48 105.81 600.2904 16,584.67 17,184.96 234678HxCDF 6,666,667 815.20 83.63 898.8347 17,055.82 17,954.66 123789HxCDF 6,658,740 350.65  350.6542 10,282.50 10,633.16 1234678HpCDF 665,874 130.16 126.01 256.1721 4,047.12 4,303.29 1234789HpCDF 666,667 86.88 43.24 130.117 1,736.21 1,866.32 OCDF 67,367 33.85 104.87 138.7221 1,175.97 1,314.70 Chlor alkali Chlor alkali Total Facility Load CA/ Vinyl PPGLC ATTACHMENT D: Load Calculations in TWPE PPG, Natrium, WV Concentrations and Flows TWF Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) 2378TCDD 421,600,000 0 0 12378PeCDD 215,384,615 0 1.65 123478HxCDD 43,076,923 0 0 123678HxCDD 41,791,045 0 0 123789HxCDD 43,076,923 0 0 1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 23.1 9.14 OCDD 423,510 355 189 2378TCDF 6,696,140 5.96 0 12378PeCDF 3,294,118 12 8.92 23478PeCDF 32,941,176 12.5 36.9 123478HxCDF 6,658,740 20 15.7 123678HxCDF 6,666,667 8.13 2.99 234678HxCDF 6,666,667 0 0 123789HxCDF 6,658,740 0 0 1234678HpCDF 665,874 13.1 0 1234789HpCDF 666,667 0 0 OCDF 67,367 78.3 29.7 Flow ( MGD) 14.6 15 Date 12/ 18/ 03 3/ 5/ 04 Stream Name K2 North Sewer Load Calculations for K2 and North Sewer TWF K2 North Sewer Total 2378TCDD 421,600,000   0 12378PeCDD 215,384,615  16,238.92 16238.92 123478HxCDD 43,076,923   0 123678HxCDD 41,791,045   0 123789HxCDD 43,076,923   0 1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 4,293.54 1,745.37 6038.911 OCDD 423,510 6,686.71 3,657.50 10344.21 2378TCDF 6,696,140 1,774.97  1774.97 12378PeCDF 3,294,118 1,758.09 1,342.65 3100.737 23478PeCDF 32,941,176 18,313.41 55,542.33 73855.74 123478HxCDF 6,658,740 5,923.01 4,776.95 10699.95 123678HxCDF 6,666,667 2,410.57 910.83 3321.401 234678HxCDF 6,666,667   0 123789HxCDF 6,658,740   0 1234678HpCDF 665,874 387.96  387.9569 1234789HpCDF 666,667   0 OCDF 67,367 234.60 91.42 326.0234 PPGWV ATTACHMENT D: Load Calculations in TWPE Concentrations and Load Calculations for Georgia Gulf, Plaquemine, LA TWF Conc ppq Total Facility Load ( TWPE) 2378TCDD 421,600,000 CBI CBI 12378PeCDD 215,384,615 CBI CBI 123478HxCDD 43,076,923 CBI CBI 123678HxCDD 41,791,045 CBI CBI 123789HxCDD 43,076,923 CBI CBI 1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 CBI CBI OCDD 423,510 CBI CBI 2378TCDF 6,696,140 CBI CBI 12378PeCDF 3,294,118 CBI CBI 23478PeCDF 32,941,176 CBI CBI 123478HxCDF 6,658,740 CBI CBI 123678HxCDF 6,666,667 CBI CBI 234678HxCDF 6,666,667 CBI CBI 123789HxCDF 6,658,740 CBI CBI 1234678HpCDF 665,874 CBI CBI 1234789HpCDF 666,667 CBI CBI OCDF 67,367 CBI CBI Flow ( MGD) CBI GGP ATTACHMENT D:

Load Calculations in TWPE Oxyvinyls, Deer Park, TX Concentrations and Flows TWF Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L)

2378TCDD 421,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12378PeCDD 215,384,615 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123478HxCDD 43,076,923 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123678HxCDD 41,791,045 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123789HxCDD 43,076,923 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 33.8 18 0 5.2 10 9.7 0 8.55 0 13 7.8 5.2 6.2 5.6 0 0 OCDD 423,510 183 580 130 110 200 160 86 119 17 420 130 77 120 140 68 35.3 2378TCDF 6,696,140 1060 5.6 6.9 6.4 7.2 4.5 6.9 3.69 4.26 2.9 0 10 9.7 22 0 2.44 12378PeCDF 3,294,118 3350 18 0 18 18 10 15 4.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23478PeCDF 32,941,176 2300 7.6 0 0 6 0 0 3.19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123478HxCDF 6,658,740 4170 26 22 19 30 19 22 5.84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123678HxCDF 6,666,667 1170 6.6 3.6 6.3 8.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 234678HxCDF 6,666,667 411 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123789HxCDF 6,658,740 1140 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1234678HpCDF 665,874 1180 0 0 0 18 15 0 3.99 9.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.1 1234789HpCDF 666,667 700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 OCDF 67,367 1050 40 48 0 35 46 0 28.8 0 34 45 21 88 28 0 682 Flow ( MGD) 0.234 63.2 62.6 61.3 45.9 68 74 74 0.194 4.2 4.045 6.14 3.56 2.65 7.03 2.425 Date Aug 00 Mar 98 May 98 Aug 98 Jan 99 Feb 99 Aug 99 Aug 200 Nov 01 Mar 98 May 98 Aug 98 Jan 99 Feb 99 Aug 99 Nov 01 Stream Name Outfall 201 Outfall 002 Outfall 002 Outfall 002 Outfall 002 Outfall 002 Outfall 002 Outfall 002 Outfall 101 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Load Calculation Outfall 002 TWF Mar 98 May 98 Aug 98 1998 Load Jan 99 Feb 99 Aug 99 1999 Load Aug 200 2000 Load Average Annual Load 2378TCDD 421,600,000

12378PeCDD 215,384,615

123478HxCDD 43,076,923

123678HxCDD 41,791,045

123789HxCDD 43,076,923

1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 14,482.39  4,058.02 6,180.14 5,843.37 8,397.14  4,746.83 8,054.68 8,054.68 6,327.22 OCDD 423,510 47,290.79 10,499.03 8,699.31 22,163.04 11,843.34 14,036.55 8,210.35 11,363.41 11,360.83 ######## #######

2378TCDF 6,696,140 7,219.33 8,810.80 8,002.62 8,010.92 6,741.20 6,241.85 10,415.32 7,799.46 5,569.93 5,569.93 7,126.77 12378PeCDF 3,294,118 11,415.53  11,072.34 7,495.96 8,290.71 6,823.63 11,138.57 8,750.97 3,081.67 3,081.67 6,442.87 23478PeCDF 32,941,176 48,198.90   16,066.30 27,635.69   9,211.90 23,688.02 ######## #######

123478HxCDF 6,658,740 33,331.11 27,935.50 23,625.09 28,297.23 27,931.44 26,207.28 33,022.79 29,053.84 8,766.05 8,766.05 #######

123678HxCDF 6,666,667 8,471.05 4,576.70 7,842.91 6,963.55 7,830.11   2,610.04   3,191.20 234678HxCDF 6,666,667

123789HxCDF 6,658,740

1234678HpCDF 665,874     1,675.89 2,069.00  1,248.29 598.91 598.91 615.74 1234789HpCDF 666,667

OCDF 67,367 518.79 616.63  378.47 329.68 641.92  323.87 437.36 437.36 379.90 Load Calculation Outfall 001 TWF Mar 98 May 98 Aug 98 1998 Load Jan 99 Feb 99 Aug 99 1999 Load Nov 01 2001 Load Average Annual Load 2378TCDD 421,600,000

12378PeCDD 215,384,615

123478HxCDD 43,076,923

123678HxCDD 41,791,045

123789HxCDD 43,076,923

1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 695.09 401.66 406.46 501.07 280.99 188.92  156.64   219.24 OCDD 423,510 2,275.78 678.41 609.94 1,188.05 551.14 478.64 616.73 548.84 110.44 110.44 615.77 2378TCDF 6,696,140 248.45  1,252.45 500.30 704.39 1,189.22  631.20 120.70 120.70 417.40 12378PeCDF 3,294,118

23478PeCDF 32,941,176

123478HxCDF 6,658,740

123678HxCDF 6,666,667

234678HxCDF 6,666,667

123789HxCDF 6,658,740

1234678HpCDF 665,874         182.49 182.49 60.83 1234789HpCDF 666,667         61.07 61.07 20.36 OCDF 67,367 29.30 37.35 26.46 31.04 64.29 15.23  26.51 339.40 339.40 132.31 Total Load for Outfalls 001 and 002 TWF Total Facility Load 2378TCDD 421,600,000

12378PeCDD 215,384,615

123478HxCDD 43,076,923

123678HxCDD 41,791,045

123789HxCDD 43,076,923

1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 6,546.46 OCDD 423,510 15,578.20 2378TCDF 6,696,140 7,544.17 12378PeCDF 3,294,118 6,442.87 23478PeCDF 32,941,176 16,322.07 123478HxCDF 6,658,740 22,039.04 123678HxCDF 6,666,667 3,191.20 234678HxCDF 6,666,667

123789HxCDF 6,658,740

1234678HpCDF 665,874 676.57 1234789HpCDF 666,667 20.36 OCDF 67,367 512.21 OCDPTX ATTACHMENT D:

Load Calculations in TWPE Oxyvinyls, LaPorte, TX Concentrations and Flows TWF Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ppq Conc ppq Conc ppq 2378TCDD 421,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12378PeCDD 215,384,615 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123478HxCDD 43,076,923 0 0 0 0.03 0 0.03 0 123678HxCDD 41,791,045 0 0 0 0.04 0 0.11 0 123789HxCDD 43,076,923 0 0 0 0.07 0 0.06 0 1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 0 3.22 7.43 1.77 0 1.5 6.98 OCDD 423,510 180 180 193 71.64 0 12.83 32.2 2378TCDF 6,696,140 0 0 0 0.32 0 0 0 12378PeCDF 3,294,118 0 0 0 0.33 0 1.81 8.04 23478PeCDF 32,941,176 0 0 0 0.3 0 0.41 0 123478HxCDF 6,658,740 0 0 2.76 0.61 0 3.35 14.8 123678HxCDF 6,666,667 0 0 2.68 0.57 0 1.39 11.7 234678HxCDF 6,666,667 0 0 2.86 0.51 0 0.59 7.23 123789HxCDF 6,658,740 0 0 0 0.08 0 0.14 0 1234678HpCDF 665,874 0 0 5.09 0 30 29.53 64.1 1234789HpCDF 666,667 0 0 0 0.55 4 4.02 18.6 OCDF 67,367 0 0 7.83 0.93 900 632.64 1560 Flow ( MGD) 1.9425 1.239 1.622 1.68 0.525 0.893 0.893 Date Feb 96 Oct 02 Mar 03 May 03 May 95 Mar 03 Mar 03 Stream Name Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001Outfall 001Outfall 001 Univ of Houston Study Load Calculations TWF Feb 96 1996 Load Oct 02 2002 Load Mar 03 May 03 2003 Load Average Annual Load May 95 1995 Load 3 Mar 3 Mar 2003 Load Average Annual Load 2378TCDD 421,600,000

12378PeCDD 215,384,615

123478HxCDD 43,076,923      6.61 3.31 1.10   3.52  1.76 0.88 1.98 123678HxCDD 41,791,045      8.55 4.28 1.43   12.51  6.25 3.13 4.55 123789HxCDD 43,076,923      15.43 7.72 2.57   7.03  3.52 1.76 4.33 1234678HpCDD 4,179,104   50.79 50.79 153.42 37.86 95.64 48.81   17.05 79.35 48.20 24.10 72.91 OCDD 423,510 451.09 451.09 287.72 287.72 403.87 155.27 279.57 339.46   14.78 37.10 25.94 12.97 352.43 2378TCDF 6,696,140      10.97 5.48 1.83       1.83 12378PeCDF 3,294,118      5.56 2.78 0.93   16.22 72.05 44.13 22.07 22.99 23478PeCDF 32,941,176      50.58 25.29 8.43   36.74  18.37 9.19 17.61 123478HxCDF 6,658,740     90.81 20.79 55.80 18.60   60.68 268.09 164.38 82.19 100.79 123678HxCDF 6,666,667     88.28 19.45 53.86 17.95   25.21 212.18 118.70 59.35 77.30 234678HxCDF 6,666,667     94.21 17.40 55.80 18.60   10.70 131.12 70.91 35.45 54.06 123789HxCDF 6,658,740      2.73 1.36 0.45   2.54  1.27 0.63 1.09 1234678HpCDF 665,874     16.75  8.37 2.79 31.95 31.95 53.49 116.11 84.80 58.37 61.16 1234789HpCDF 666,667      1.88 0.94 0.31 4.26 4.26 7.29 33.73 20.51 12.39 12.70 OCDF 67,367     2.61 0.32 1.46 0.49 96.96 96.96 115.94 285.88 200.91 148.94 149.43 Total Facility Load Chlor alkali OCLPTX  Vinyl OCBGTX  Chlor alkali Vinyl OCBGTX & OCLPTX ATTACHMENT D: Load Calculations in TWPE Concentrations and Load Calculations for Occidental, Ingleside, TX TWF Conc ppq Total Facility Load ( TWPE) 2378TCDD 421,600,000 0  12378PeCDD 215,384,615 0  123478HxCDD 43,076,923 0  123678HxCDD 41,791,045 0  123789HxCDD 43,076,923 0  1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 29 516.86 OCDD 423,510 330 596.04 2378TCDF 6,696,140 0  12378PeCDF 3,294,118 0  23478PeCDF 32,941,176 0  123478HxCDF 6,658,740 0  123678HxCDF 6,666,667 0  234678HxCDF 6,666,667 0  123789HxCDF 6,658,740 0  1234678HpCDF 665,874 310 880.34 1234789HpCDF 666,667 69 196.18 OCDF 67,367 1200 344.76 Flow ( MGD) 1.4 Date Sep 99 Stream Name Outfall 001 OCINGTX ATTACHMENT D: Load Calculations in TWPE Occidental, Taft, LA Concentrations and Flows TWF Conc ( pg/ L) 2378TCDD 421,600,000 0 12378PeCDD 215,384,615 0 123478HxCDD 43,076,923 0 123678HxCDD 41,791,045 0 123789HxCDD 43,076,923 0 1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 3.46 OCDD 423,510 25.3 2378TCDF 6,696,140 50.2 12378PeCDF 3,294,118 233 23478PeCDF 32,941,176 221 123478HxCDF 6,658,740 769 123678HxCDF 6,666,667 306 234678HxCDF 6,666,667 164 123789HxCDF 6,658,740 156 1234678HpCDF 665,874 1160 1234789HpCDF 666,667 179 OCDF 67,367 455 Flow ( MGD) 2.8 Date May 02 Stream Name Outfall 001 Load Calculations for Outfall 001 TWF 2002 Load 2378TCDD 421,600,000  12378PeCDD 215,384,615  123478HxCDD 43,076,923  123678HxCDD 41,791,045  123789HxCDD 43,076,923  1234678HpCDD 4,179,104 123.33 OCDD 423,510 91.39 2378TCDF 6,696,140 2,867.17 12378PeCDF 3,294,118 6,546.67 23478PeCDF 32,941,176 62,095.02 123478HxCDF 6,658,740 43,676.09 123678HxCDF 6,666,667 17,400.25 234678HxCDF 6,666,667 9,325.63 123789HxCDF 6,658,740 8,860.17 1234678HpCDF 665,874 6,588.33 1234789HpCDF 666,667 1,017.86 OCDF 67,367 261.45 OCTFLA