[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33687-33688]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13842]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0289; Airspace Docket No. 12-ANM-5]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Fort Morgan, CO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace at Fort
Morgan, CO. Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate aircraft
using a new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System (GPS)
standard instrument approach procedure at Fort Morgan Municipal
Airport, Fort Morgan, CO. The FAA is proposing this action to enhance
the safety and management of aircraft operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 23, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2012-
0289; Airspace Docket No. 12-ANM-5, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Roberts, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA 2012-0289 and Airspace Docket No. 12-ANM-5) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2012-0289 and Airspace Docket No. 12-ANM-5''. The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by establishing Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at Fort Morgan Municipal
Airport, Fort Morgan, CO. Controlled airspace is necessary to
accommodate aircraft using the new RNAV (GPS) standard instrument
approach procedure at Fort Morgan Municipal Airport. This action would
enhance the safety and management of aircraft operations at the
airport.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005, of
FAA Order 7400.9V, dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15,
2011, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in this Order.
    The FAA has determined this proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation; (1) Is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since
this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified this proposed rule, when
promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes
the authority for the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A,

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use of the airspace necessary to
ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority as it would modify
controlled airspace at Fort Morgan Municipal Airport, Fort Morgan, CO.
    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9V, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15,
2011 is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ANM CO E5 Fort Morgan, CO [New]

Fort Morgan Municipal Airport, CO
    (Lat. 40[deg]20'02'' N., Long. 103[deg]48'15'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within 7.5-mile radius of the Fort Morgan Municipal Airport.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on May 30, 2012.
John Warner,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2012-13842 Filed 6-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 138 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42299-42300]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17429]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG12-85-000.
    Applicants: Shiloh IV Wind Project, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Shiloh IV Wind Project, LLC.
    Filed Date: 7/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120710-5150.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1911-001.
    Applicants: RE McKenzie 1 LLC.
    Description: RE McKenzie 1 LLC submits tariff filing per 35.17(b):
Amended Application for Market-Based Rate Authority to be effective 7/
31/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120710-5116.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1912-001.
    Applicants: RE McKenzie 2 LLC.
    Description: Amended Application for Market-Based Rate Authority to
be effective 7/31/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120710-5126.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1913-001.

    Applicants: RE McKenzie 3 LLC.
    Description: Amended Application for Market-Based Rate Authority to
be effective 7/31/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120710-5129.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1915-001.
    Applicants: RE McKenzie 4 LLC.
    Description: Amended Application for Market-Based Rate Authority to
be effective 7/31/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120710-5131.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1916-001.
    Applicants: RE McKenzie 5 LLC.
    Description: Amended Application for Market-Based Rate Authority to
be effective 7/31/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120710-5138.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1917-001.
    Applicants: RE McKenzie 6 LLC.
    Description: Amended Application for Market-Based Rate Authority to
be effective 7/31/2012 under ER12-1917 Filing Type: 120.
    Filed Date: 7/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120710-5140.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2085-001.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Errata to Amendments to OATT Sch 12-Appx re RTEP
approved by PJM Board 5/17/2012 to be effective 9/19/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120710-5144.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2224-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: CAISO's Amendment 6 to the PLA with CDWR to be
effective 7/10/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120710-5115.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 11, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-17429 Filed 7-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 121 (Monday, June 26, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41315-41316]
[FR Doc No: 2023-13388]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1678; Airspace Docket No. 22-AWA-4]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of the Nashville International Airport Class C
Airspace; Nashville, TN; and the John C. Tune Airport Class D Airspace;
Nashville, TN

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects a final rule published by the FAA in the
Federal Register on June 6, 2023, that amended the Nashville
International Airport Class C airspace area and the John C. Tune Class
D airspace area. In the final rule, the words ``(when active)'' were
inadvertently omitted from the sentences that exclude the Smyrna
Airport Class D airspace from the Nashville Class C airspace area. The
error would cause the incorrect depiction of the Class C and Class D
airspace areas on aeronautical charts. This action corrects that error.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, August 10, 2023. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11
and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), all
comments received, the final rule, this final rule correction, and all
background material may be viewed online at www.regulations.gov using
the FAA Docket number. Electronic retrieval help and guidelines are
available on the website. It is available 24 hours each day, 365 days
each year.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. You may also contact the Rules and
Regulations Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    The FAA published a final rule for Docket No. FAA-2022-1678 in the
Federal Register (88 FR 36936; June 6, 2023), amending the Nashville
International Airport Class C airspace area and the John C. Tune Class
D airspace area. Subsequent to publication, the FAA determined that the
words ``(when active)'' were inadvertently omitted from the preamble
discussion and regulatory text that describe the exclusion of the
Smyrna Class D airspace from the Nashville Class C airspace area. Since
the Smyrna Class D airspace is a part-time designation, it is only
excluded from the Class C airspace during the times the Class D is
active. This rule corrects the preamble discussion, and the regulatory
text by adding ``(when active)'' following all references to the
exclusion of the Smyrna Class D airspace. This complies with
aeronautical charting specification requirements to ensure the proper
depiction of the airspace on the applicable charts. This action does
not alter the actual dimensions of the Class C or Class D airspace
areas.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the
preamble discussion and regulatory text contained in Docket No. FAA-
2022-1678, as published in the Federal Register of June 6, 2023 (88 FR
36936), FR Doc. 2023-11909, are corrected as follows:

0
1. In FR Doc. 2023-11909, on page 36938, add the words ``(when
active)'' following both instances of the phrase ``. . . excludes that
portion of airspace that is within the Smyrna Airport Class D airspace
area'', so that they read: ``. . . excludes that portion of airspace
that is within the Smyrna Airport Class D airspace area (when
active);''.

0
2. Amend the Nashville, TN Airport Class C description by adding the
words ``(when active)'' following references to the Smyrna, TN, Airport
Class D airspace area, to read as follows:

Sec.  71.1  [Corrected]

* * * * *

ASO TN C Nashville, TN [Amended]

Nashville International Airport, TN
    (Lat. 36[deg]07'28'' N, long. 86[deg]40'41'' W)
Smyrna Airport, TN

    (Lat. 36[deg]00'32'' N, long. 86[deg]31'12'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to 6,000 feet
MSL within a 5-mile radius of Nashville International Airport; and
that airspace extending upward from the surface to 6,000 feet MSL
within a 7-mile radius of Nashville International Airport from the
335[deg] bearing from the airport clockwise to the 230[deg] bearing
from the airport, excluding that portion within the Smyrna Airport,
TN, Class D airspace area (when active); and that airspace extending
upward from 1,800 feet MSL to 6,000 feet MSL within a 15-mile radius
of Nashville International Airport from the 335[deg] bearing from
the airport clockwise to the 060[deg] bearing from the airport; and
that airspace extending upward from 2,400 feet MSL to 6,000 feet MSL
within a 15-mile radius of the airport from the 060[deg] bearing
from the airport clockwise to the 155[deg] bearing from the airport,
excluding that portion within the Smyrna Airport, TN, Class D
airspace area (when active); and that airspace extending upward from
1,800 feet MSL to 6,000 feet MSL within a 15-mile radius of
Nashville International Airport from the 155[deg] bearing from the
airport clockwise to the 230[deg] bearing from the airport; and that
airspace extending upward from 2,400 feet MSL to 6,000 feet MSL
within a 15-mile radius of Nashville International Airport from the
230[deg] bearing from the airport clockwise to the 335[deg] bearing
from the airport.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Brian Konie,
Acting Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2023-13388 Filed 6-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 20, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 76)]
[Notices]
[Page 19915]
[DOCID:fr20ap07-46]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-397-000]

Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in
FERC Gas Tariff

April 13, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 10, 2007, Colorado Interstate Gas Company
(CIG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised
Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 272A, to become effective May 11,
2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-7572 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 210 (Wednesday, October 30, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58060-58062]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23530]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2019 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0721; Product Identifier 2019-NM-150-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041 airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by a report indicating that during inspection
of the installation of oxygen containers, certain fasteners of the
oxygen containers and adjacent panels in the passenger supply channels
(PSCs) were found damaged or unlocked, which could result in
insufficient clearance between the oxygen container and adjacent
panels. This proposed AD would require a one-time inspection of the
oxygen containers and adjacent panels and applicable corrective
actions, as specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
AD, which will be incorporated by reference. The FAA is proposing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by December
16, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For the material identified in this proposed AD that will be
incorporated by reference (IBR), contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer
3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 89990 1000; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR
material on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa. You may view
this IBR material at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0721.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0721; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2019-0721;
Product Identifier 2019-NM-150-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The FAA specifically invites comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. The agency
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this NPRM based on those comments.
    The FAA will post all comments received, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
The agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.

Discussion

    The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2019-0210, dated August 26, 2019
(``EASA AD 2019-0210'') (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041 airplanes.
    This proposed AD was prompted by a report indicating that during
inspection of the installation of oxygen containers on the production
line, certain fasteners of oxygen containers and adjacent panels in the
PSCs were found damaged or unlocked; unlocked fasteners could move on
the rails, which could result in insufficient clearance between the
oxygen container and adjacent panels. This condition, if not addressed,
could prevent the oxygen containers from opening and result in failure
of the oxygen masks to deploy and provide supplemental oxygen during an
in-flight decompression, possibly resulting in injury to cabin
occupants. See the MCAI for additional background information.

Related IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2019-0210 describes procedures for inspecting the oxygen
containers and the installation of adjacent panels located in all PSCs,
to check that each fastener of each panel/component is locked and to
measure the clearance between the oxygen container door lid and the
adjacent panel/component. EASA AD 2019-0210 also describes procedures
for applicable corrective actions, including attaining minimum
clearance, locking any unlocked fasteners, and replacing damaged parts.
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the agency has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information referenced above. The FAA is proposing
this AD because the agency evaluated all the relevant information and
determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist
or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2019-0210 described previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this AD.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA initially worked with Airbus and EASA to develop a
process to use certain EASA ADs as the primary source of information
for compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has
since coordinated with other manufacturers and civil aviation
authorities (CAAs) to use this process. As a result, EASA AD 2019-0210
will be incorporated by reference in the FAA final rule. This proposed
AD would, therefore, require compliance with EASA AD 2019-0210 in its
entirety, through that incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same as the heading of a particular
section in the EASA AD does not mean that operators need comply only
with that section. For example, where the AD requirement refers to
``all required actions and compliance times,'' compliance with this AD
requirement is not limited to the section titled ``Required Action(s)
and Compliance Time(s)'' in the EASA AD. Service information specified
in EASA AD 2019-0210 that is required for compliance with EASA AD 2019-
0210 will be available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0721 after the FAA
final rule is published.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD would affect 11 airplanes
of U.S. registry. The agency estimates the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 work-hours x $85 per hour = $340...........................              $0             $340           $3,740
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary
corrective action that would be required based on the results of the
inspection. The agency has no way of determining the number of aircraft
that might need this corrective action:

                 Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Cost per
              Labor cost                   Parts cost        product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85......              $0              $85
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the
Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA-2019-0721; Product Identifier 2019-NM-
150-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments by December 16, 2019.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in European
Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2019-0210, dated August 26,
2019 (``EASA AD 2019-0210'').

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35, Oxygen.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report that during inspection of the
installation of oxygen containers, certain fasteners of the oxygen
containers and adjacent panels in the passenger supply channels
(PSCs) were found damaged or unlocked; which could result in
insufficient clearance between the oxygen container and adjacent
panels. The FAA is issuing this AD to address this condition, which
could prevent the opening of the oxygen containers and result in
failure of the oxygen masks to deploy and provide supplemental
oxygen in case of an in-flight decompression, possibly resulting in
injury to cabin occupants.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2019-0210.

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2019-0210

    (1) Where EASA AD 2019-0210 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2019-0210 does not apply
to this AD.

(i) No Reporting Requirement

    Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2019-0210
specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus SAS's
EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the
approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any service information
referenced in EASA AD 2019-0210 that contains RC procedures and
tests: RC procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD;
any procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are
recommended. Those procedures and tests that are not identified as
RC may be deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with
the operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.

(k) Related Information

    (1) For information about EASA AD 2019-0210, contact EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
89990 6017; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet www.easa.europa.eu.
You may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this EASA AD at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. EASA AD 2019-0210 may be found in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0721.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Kathleen
Arrigotti, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on October 22, 2019.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-23530 Filed 10-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


8016 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 33 / Wednesday, February 19, 2003 / Notices ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ OPPT   2002   0309; FRL   7281   7]

Oxadiazon; Availability of Revised Risk Assessments AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of documents that were developed as part of EPA's process for making pesticide reregistration eligibility decisions consistent with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ( FFDCA), as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 ( FQPA). These documents are the human health and environmental fate and effects risk assessments, and related documents for oxadiazon. Oxadiazon, an herbicide, is used primarily on golf courses, and has no remaining tolerances. This notice also starts a 60 day public comment period for the risk assessments. Comments are to be limited to issues directly associated with oxadiazon, and raised by the risk assessments or other documents placed in the docket. By allowing access and opportunity for comment on the risk assessments, EPA is seeking to strengthen stakeholder involvement and help ensure that our decisions under FQPA are transparent and based on the best available information. The Agency cautions that these risk assessments for oxadiazon are preliminary and that further refinements may be appropriate. Risk assessments reflect only the work and analysis conducted as of the time they were produced and it is appropriate that, as new information becomes available and/ or additional analyses are performed, the conclusions they contain may change. DATES: Comments, identified by the docket ID number OPP   2002   0309, must be received on or before April 21, 2003. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/ courier. Follow the detailed instructions as provided in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Seaton, Special Review and Reregistration Division ( 7508C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001; telephone number: ( 703) 306   0469; e mail address: seaton. mark@ epa. gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me? This action is directed to the public in general, but will be of interest to a wide range of stakeholders, including environmental, human health, and agricultural advocates, the chemical industry, pesticide users, and members of the public interested in the use of pesticides. The Agency has not attempted to describe all the persons or entities who may be interested in, or affected by this action. If you have questions in this regard, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information? 1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this action under docket identification ( ID) number OPP   2002   0309. The official public docket consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other information related to this action. Although, a part of the official docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business Information ( CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public docket is the collection of materials that are available for public viewing at the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch ( PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall # 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket telephone number is ( 703) 305   5805. 2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA internet under the `` Federal Register'' listings at http:// www. epa. gov/ fedrgstr/. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket/ to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select `` search,'' then key in the appropriate docket ID number. Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA dockets. Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute, which is not included in the official public docket, will not be available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will not be placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in printed, paper form in the official public docket. To the extent feasible, publicly available docket materials will be made available in EPA's electronic public docket. When a document is selected from the index list in EPA dockets, the system will identify whether the document is available for viewing in EPA's electronic public docket. Although, not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I. B. EPA intends to work towards providing electronic access to all of the publicly available docket materials through EPA's electronic public docket. For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or on paper, will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless, the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket. Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public docket. Public comments that are mailed, or delivered to the Docket will be scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public docket. Where practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph will be placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with a brief description written by the docket staff.

C. How and To Whom Do I Submit Comments? You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/ courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate docket ID number in the subject line on the first page of your comment. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked `` late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late comments. If you VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 17: 57 Feb 18, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 19FEN1. SGM 19FEN1 8017 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 33 / Wednesday, February 19, 2003 / Notices wish to submit CBI or information that is otherwise protected by statute, please follow the instructions in Unit I. D. Do not use EPA Dockets or e mail to submit CBI or information protected by statute. 1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as prescribed in this unit, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other contact information in the body of your comment. Also, include this contact information on the outside of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further information on the substance of your comment. EPA's policy is that EPA will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once in the system, select `` search,'' and then key in docket ID number OPP   2002   0309. The system is an `` anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity, e mail address, or other contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. ii. E mail. Comments may be sent by e mail to opp docket@ epa. gov, Attention: Docket ID Number OPP   2002   0309. In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e mail system is not an `` anonymous access'' system. If you send an e mail comment directly to the docket without going through EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e mail system automatically captures your e mail address. E mail addresses that are automatically captured by EPA's e mail system are included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM that you mail to the mailing address identified in Unit I. C. 2. These electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect or ASCII file format. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption. 2. By mail. Send your comments to: Public Information and Records Integrity Branch ( PIRIB), Office of Pesticide Programs ( OPP), Environmental Protection Agency ( 7502C), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001, Attention: Docket ID Number OPP   2002   0309. 3. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver your comments to: Public Information and Records Integrity Branch ( PIRIB), Office of Pesticide Programs ( OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall # 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket ID Number OPP   2002   0309. Such deliveries are only accepted during the docket's normal hours of operation as identified in Unit I. B. 1.

D. How Should I Submit CBI to the Agency?

Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI electronically through EPA's electronic public docket or by e mail. You may claim information that you submit to EPA as CBI by marking any part or all of that information as CBI. If you submit CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that is CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes any information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket and EPA's electronic public docket. If you submit the copy that does not contain CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM clearly that it does not contain CBI. Information not marked as CBI will be included in the public docket and EPA's electronic public docket without prior notice. If you have any questions about CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI, please consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

E. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your comments: 1. Explain your views as clearly as possible. 2. Describe any assumptions that you used. 3. Provide copies of any technical information and/ or data you used that support your views. 4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you arrived at the estimate that you provide. 5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns. 6. Offer alternative ways to improve the notice. 7. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline in this document. 8. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal Register citation.

II. Background A. What Action is the Agency Taking?

EPA is making available risk assessments that have been developed as part of the Agency's public participation process for making reregistration eligibility decisions for the organophosphate and other pesticides consistent with FFDCA, as amended by FQPA. The Agency's human health and environmental fate and effects risk assessments and other related documents for oxadiazon are available in the individual pesticide docket. As additional comments, reviews, and risk assessment modifications become available, these will also be docketed for oxadiazon. The Agency cautions that the oxadiazon risk assessments are preliminary and that further refinements may be appropriate. These documents reflect only the work and analysis conducted as of the time they were produced and it is appropriate that, as new information becomes available and/ or additional analyses are performed, the conclusions they contain may change. EPA is providing an opportunity, through this notice, for interested parties to provide written comments and input to the Agency on the risk assessments for the pesticide specified in this notice. Such comments and input could address, for example, the availability of additional data to further refine the risk assessments, such as percent crop treated information or submission of residue data from food processing studies, or could address the Agency's risk assessment methodologies and assumptions as applied to this specific chemical. Comments should be limited to issues raised within the risk assessments and associated documents. EPA will provide other opportunities for public comment on other science issues VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 17: 57 Feb 18, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 19FEN1. SGM 19FEN1 8018 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 33 / Wednesday, February 19, 2003 / Notices associated with the pesticide tolerance reassessment program. Failure to comment on any such issues as part of this opportunity will in no way prejudice or limit a commenter's opportunity to participate fully in later notice and comment processes. All comments should be submitted by April 21, 2003 using the methods in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Comments will become part of the Agency record for oxadiazon.

List of Subjects Environmental protection, Chemicals, Oxadiazon, Pesticides.

Dated: December 3, 2002. Lois A. Rossi, Director, Special Review and Reregistration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. [ FR Doc. 03   3844 Filed 2   18   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   S FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Notice of Public Information Collection( s) Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission for Extension Under Delegated Authority, Comments Requested February 11, 2003. SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection( s), as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104   13. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act ( PRA) that does not display a valid control number. Comments are requested concerning ( a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; ( b) the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; ( c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and ( d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. DATES: Persons wishing to comment on this information collection should submit comments by April 21, 2003. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible. ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Judy Boley Herman, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 1   C804, Washington, DC 20554 or via the Internet to jboley@ fcc. gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or copies of the information collections contact Judy Boley Herman at 202   418   0214 or via the Internet at jboley@ fcc. gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control No.: 3060   0400. Title: Tariff Review Plan. Form No.: N/ A. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection. Respondents: Business or other for profit. Number of Respondents: 45. Estimated Time Per Response: 61 hours. Frequency of Response: On occasion, annual and biennial reporting requirements. Total Annual Burden: 2,745 hours. Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden: N/ A. Needs and Uses: Certain local exchange carriers are required annually to submit Tariff Review Plans in partial fulfillment of cost support material required by 47 CFR part 61. The information is used by the Commission and the public to determine the justness and reasonableness of rates, terms and conditions in tariffs as required by the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. OMB Control No.: 3060   0421. Title: New Service Reporting Requirements Under Price Cap Regulation. Form No.: N/ A. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection. Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities. Number of Respondents: 17. Estimated Time Per Response: 20 hours. Frequency of Response: Annual reporting requirement. Total Annual Burden: 340 hours. Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden: N/ A. Needs and Uses: The Commission seeks to extend for three years the current obligation of price cap local exchange carriers ( LECs) to file annual reports comparing their actual results of operation with the projections made when those LECs filed tariff revisions to offer new services. The Commission staff continues to use these reports to monitor the new services to which these reports relate and to evaluate the reliability of subsequent new service showings submitted by these carriers. OMB Control No.: 3060   0514. Title: Section 43.21( b), Holding Company Annual Report. Form No.: N/ A. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection. Respondents: Business or other for profit. Number of Respondents: 20. Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour. Frequency of Response: Annual reporting requirement. Total Annual Burden: 20 hours. Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden: N/ A. Needs and Uses: The SEC 10K form is needed from holding companies of communications common carriers to provide the Commission with the data required to fulfill its regulatory responsibilities and by the public in analyzing the industry. Selected information is compiled and published in the Commission's annual common carrier statistical publication.

OMB Control No.: 3060   0894. Title: Certification Letter Accounting for Receipt of Federal Support, CC Docket Nos. 96   45 and 96   262. Form No.: N/ A. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection. Respondents: State, local or tribal government. Number of Respondents: 51. Estimated Time Per Response: 3 hours. Frequency of Response: On occasion and annual reporting requirements. Total Annual Burden: 153 hours. Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden: N/ A. Needs and Uses: The Commission requires states to certify that carriers with the state had accounted for its receipt of federal support in its rates or otherwise used the support pursuant with section 254( e).

Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary. [ FR Doc. 03   3866 Filed 2   18   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712   01   P VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 17: 57 Feb 18, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 19FEN1. SGM 19FEN1


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 204 (Friday, October 21, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72808-72809]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25481]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-D-0319]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Guidance for Industry
and Food and Drug Administration Staff on Dear Health Care Provider
Letters: Improving Communication of Important Safety Information

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing
that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA).

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by
November 21, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0754.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A63, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.

Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff on Dear
Health Care Provider Letters: Improving Communication of Important
Safety Information--OMB Control Number 0910-0754--Extension

    This final Guidance for Industry and FDA staff entitled ``Dear
Health Care Provider Letters: Improving Communication of Important
Safety Information'' offers specific guidance to industry and FDA staff
on the content and format of Dear Health Care Provider (DHCP) letters.
These letters are sent by manufacturers or distributors to health care
providers to communicate an important drug warning, a change in
prescribing information, or a correction of misinformation in
prescription drug promotional labeling or advertising.
    This guidance gives specific instruction on what should and should
not be included in DHCP letters. To date, some DHCP letters have been
too long, have contained promotional material, or otherwise have not
met the goals set forth in the applicable regulation (21 CFR 200.5). In
some cases, health care providers have not been aware of important new
information and have been unable to communicate it to patients because
the letters' content and length have made it difficult to find the
relevant information. In addition, letters have

sometimes been sent for the wrong reasons.
    In addition to content and format recommendations for each type of
DHCP letter, the guidance also includes advice on consulting with FDA
to develop a DHCP letter, when to send a letter, what type of letter to
send, and conducting an assessment of the letter's impact.
    Based on a review of FDA's Document Archiving, Reporting and
Regulatory Tracking System for 2012 to 2015, we identified DHCP letters
that were sent and the identity of each sponsor sending out a DHCP
letter for each year. We estimate that we will receive approximately 25
DHCP Letters annually from approximately 18 application holders. FDA
professionals familiar with DHCP letters and with the recommendations
in the guidance estimate that it should take an application holder
approximately 100 hours to prepare and send DHCP letters in accordance
with the guidance.
    In the Federal Register of March 10, 2016 (81 FR 12734), we
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
extension of this collection of information. No comments were received.
    FDA estimates the annual reporting burden of this collection of
information as follows:

                                                     Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of                       Average burden
                              Activity                                  Number of      responses per     Total annual     per response     Total hours
                                                                       respondents       respondent       responses         (hours)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual average.....................................................              18              1.4               25              100            2,500
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    Dated: October 17, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-25481 Filed 10-20-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: September 22, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 182)]
[Notices]
[Page 48260-48261]
[DOCID:fr22se09-72]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1656-000]

Ashtabula Wind II, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

September 15, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Ashtabula Wind II, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is October 5, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original
and14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any

FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-22707 Filed 9-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28414-28415]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11535]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-66944; File No. SR-BX-2012-029]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify
the Exchange's Co-Location Super High Density Cabinet Monthly Fee

May 8, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 27, 2012, The NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to modify the Exchange's co-location super
high-density cabinet monthly fee. The Exchange will implement the
proposed change on May 1, 2012.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at http://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the Exchange's principal office, and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is modifying Rule 7034(a) by reducing its co-location
super high-density cabinet on-going monthly fee from $15,000 per month
to $13,000 per month. The installation fee for the super high-density
cabinet will remain the same.
    Co-location customers have the option of obtaining several cabinet
sizes and power densities. The co-located customer may obtain a half
cabinet, a low density cabinet, a medium density cabinet, a medium-high
density cabinet and a high density cabinet.\3\ Each cabinet may vary in
size and maximum power capacity. The fees related to the cabinet and
power usage are incremental, with additional charges being imposed
based on higher levels of cabinet and/or power usage, the use of non-
standard cabinet sizes or special cabinet cooling equipment. The co-
location customer may obtain more power by choosing a combination of
lower power density cabinets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Exchange Rule 7034(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange previously filed an immediately effective filing with
the Commission to offer another choice of cabinet, specifically a
larger cabinet (30'' W x 48'' D x 96'' H) with higher power (``Super
High Density Cabinet'') as an alternative to combining several units
for more power (>10kW<=17.3kW).\4\ Currently, the installation fee for
the Super High Density Cabinet is $7,000; and the on-going monthly fee
is $15,000. At this time, the Exchange proposes to reduce the current
on-going monthly fee to $13,000 to bring the fee in line with Exchange
fees for similar power levels using multiple cabinets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66542 (March 8,
2012), 77 FR 15169 (March 14, 2012) (SR-BX-2012-012)[sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\5\ in general, and with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that it provides for
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other persons using any facility or
system which the Exchange operates or controls.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed reduction of the on-going
monthly fee is reasonable because it is in line with Exchange fees for
similar power levels using multiple cabinets. The Exchange also
believes the reduction in the on-going monthly fee is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because the super high-density power option is
entirely voluntary and available to all members; therefore, the
reduction is available to all members that select this power option.
Also, the Exchange also believes the reduction in fees is equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because the reduction diminishes the
disparity in the Exchange's fees for various co-location power options.
This results in a more competitive cost structure for the Exchange. The
Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee
levels at a particular venue to be excessive, or opportunities
available at other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment,
the Exchange must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive
with other trading venues. These competitive forces help to ensure that
the Exchange's fees are reasonable, equitably allocated, and not
unfairly discriminatory since market participants can largely avoid
fees to which they object by changing their operating venue.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. The
Exchange is reducing fees through this proposed rule change, thereby
enhancing the competitiveness of its co-location offering.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\7\ At any time

within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii)[sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BX-2012-029 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2012-029. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2012-029 and should be
submitted on or before June 4, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-11535 Filed 5-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: February 11, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 28)]
[Notices]
[Page 7774-7776]
[DOCID:fr11fe08-103]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57273; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2008-06]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Dissemination of the Index
Value for Equity Index-Linked Securities

February 5, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 11, 2008, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or ``Exchange''),
through its wholly owned subsidiary, NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (``NYSE
Arca Equities''), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule
5.2(j)(6)(B)(I)(2)(c)(ii) to provide that the Exchange will commence
delisting or removal proceedings if the value of an index or composite
value of the indexes underlying an issuance of Equity Index-Linked
Securities\3\ is no longer calculated or widely disseminated on at
least a 15-second basis with respect to an index or indexes containing
only securities listed on a national securities exchange, or on at
least a 60-second basis with respect to an index or indexes containing
foreign country securities. The text of the proposed rule change is
available at the Exchange, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and
http://www.nyse.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Equity Index-Linked Securities are securities that provide
for the payment at maturity of a cash amount based on the
performance of an underlying index or indexes of equity securities.
See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the

proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(6)(B)(I)(2)(c)(ii) currently
provides that the Exchange will commence delisting or removal
proceedings of an issue of Equity Index-Linked Securities (unless the
Commission has approved continued trading of such Securities) if, among
other circumstances, the value of the index or composite value of the
indexes underlying such issue is no longer calculated or widely
disseminated on at least a 15-second basis. The Exchange proposes to
amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(6)(B)(I)(2)(c)(ii) to distinguish
between indexes consisting solely of U.S. equity securities and those
consisting of foreign securities or a combination of U.S. and foreign
equity securities. The proposed amendment provides that the Exchange
will commence delisting or removal proceedings if the underlying index
value or composite index value is no longer calculated or widely
disseminated: (1) On at least a 15-second basis with respect to an
index or indexes containing only securities listed on a national
securities exchange;\4\ or (2) on at least a 60-second basis with
respect to an index or indexes containing foreign country securities.
If the official index value does not change during some or all of the
period when trading is occurring on the NYSE Arca Marketplace\5\ (for
example, for indexes of foreign country securities, because of time
zone differences or holidays in the countries where such indexes'
component stocks trade), then the last calculated official index value
must remain available throughout NYSE Arca Marketplace trading hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange states that American Depositary Shares and
common shares of foreign issuers listed on U.S. national securities
exchanges included in an index or indexes would be subject to the
15-second dissemination requirement. E-mail from Timothy J.
Malinowski, Director, NYSE Euronext, to Edward Cho, Special Counsel,
Division of Trading and Markets, Commission, dated January 30, 2008.
    \5\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(e) (defining NYSE Arca
Marketplace).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange seeks to conform the index dissemination requirements
for Equity Index-Linked Securities to those for Investment Company
Units, which include exchange-traded funds or ``ETFs,'' under NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3). Specifically, Commentary .01(b)(2) to NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) requires that the value of an
international or global index underlying an ETF must be widely
disseminated by one or more major market data vendors at least every 60
seconds during the Core Trading Session (9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern
Time).\6\ This 60-second standard reflects limitations, in some
instances, on the frequency of intra-day trading information with
respect to foreign country securities and that in many cases, trading
hours for overseas markets overlap only in part, or not at all, with
NYSE Arca Marketplace trading hours. In addition, Commentary .01(b)(2)
to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) provides that, if the index value
does not change during some or all of the period when trading is
occurring on the NYSE Arca Marketplace, the last official calculated
index value must remain available throughout NYSE Arca Marketplace
trading hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.34 (describing the hours of
the three trading sessions on the Exchange).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange states that written comments on the proposed rule
change were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
    A. By order approve such proposed rule change, or
    B. Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
    The Exchange has requested accelerated approval of this proposed
rule change prior to the 30th day after the date of publication of the
notice of the filing thereof. The Commission has determined that a 15-
day comment period is appropriate in this case.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NYSEArca-2008-06 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2008-06. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the

public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2008-06 and should be submitted on or before
February 26, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-2442 Filed 2-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: April 13, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 71)]
[Notices]
[Page 19226-19227]
[DOCID:fr13ap06-129]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-53615; File No. SR-PCX-2006-24]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendments No. 1 and 2 Thereto To Change the Names of the Pacific
Exchange, Inc., PCX Equities, Inc., PCX Holdings, Inc., and the
Archipelago Exchange, L.L.C.

April 7, 2006.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 6, 2006, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange''), through
its wholly-owned subsidiary PCX Equities, Inc. filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. On March 30, 2006, the Exchange filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\ On April 5, 2006, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change.\4\ The
Exchange has designated this proposal as one being concerned solely
with the administration of the Exchange pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \5\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(3) thereunder,\6\
which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Letter from Janet Angstadt, Deputy General Counsel,
Exchange, to Heather Seidel, Senior Special Counsel, dated March 30,
2006.
    \4\ See Letter from Janet Angstadt, Deputy General Counsel,
Exchange, to Heather Seidel, Senior Special Counsel, dated April 3,
2006.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend (i) its rules, including the Options
Floor Procedure Advices, (ii) the rules of PCX Equities, Inc., (iii)
the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Exchange, (iv) the
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of PCX Equities, Inc., (v) the
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Archipelago Holdings, Inc., and (vi) the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of PCX Holdings, Inc.
(collectively, the ``Operative Documents'') to make changes to the
following names: Pacific Exchange, Inc., PCX Equities, Inc., PCX
Holdings, Inc., and Archipelago Exchange, L.L.C. The proposed name
changes relate to recent ownership changes at the Exchange. The
Exchange also proposes to change references to ``Arca Book,''
``Archipelago Exchange,'' and ``ArcaEx'' in the Operative Documents.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Internet Web site (http://www.archipelago.com), at the Exchange's

principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. The
text of Exhibit 5 to the proposed rule change (showing proposed changes
to the Operative Documents) also is available on the Commission's
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.html).

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the Operative Documents to make
changes to the following names: Pacific Exchange, Inc., PCX Equities,
Inc., PCX Holdings, Inc., and Archipelago Exchange, L.L.C. The proposed
name changes relate to recent ownership changes at the Exchange. On
September 26, 2005, Archipelago Holdings, Inc. acquired PCX Holdings,
Inc., the parent company of the Exchange. On or about March 7, 2006,
Archipelago Holdings, Inc. completed a proposed business combination
with the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. As a result of these corporate
changes, the Exchange proposes the following specific name changes to
the entities listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Current name of entity                Proposed entity name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific Exchange, Inc                 NYSE Arca, Inc.
PCX Equities, Inc                     NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.
PCX Holdings, Inc                     NYSE Arca Holdings, Inc.
Archipelago Exchange, L.L.C           NYSE Arca, L.L.C.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange proposes to amend the Operative Documents
to change references to ``Arca Book'' to ``NYSE Arca Book'' and to
change references to ``Archipelago Exchange'' and ``ArcaEx'' to ``NYSE
Arca Marketplace.'' The Exchange represents that the filing reflects
name changes only and does not affect in any manner the Exchange's
operations and governance structure.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with section 6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of
a free and open market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because it is concerned solely with the administration of the
Exchange, the foregoing proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(3) \10\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of
the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such
rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(3).
    \11\ For purposes of calculating the 60-day period within which
the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule change under
section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission considers the period
to commence on April 5, 2006, the date on which the Exchange filed
Amendment No. 2. See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File No. SR-PCX-2006-24 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2006-24. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-PCX-2006-24 and should be submitted on or before May 4,
2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-5486 Filed 4-12-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P