			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on September 24, 2003

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST 2003-16106

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  AIR CANADA

Date Filed:  September 5, 2003, as clarified by letter dated September
16, 2003.

Relief requested:  Statement of Authorization under 14 CFR Part 212 to
permit Air Canada and its subsidiary Jazz Air to carry the code of
Asiana Airlines, for an indefinite duration, on scheduled flights
operated by Air Canada and/or Jazz Air, between any point or points in
Canada and any point or points in the United States (in conjunction with
Asiana’s services between Korea and the United States).

If renewal, date and citation of last action:  New authority.

Applicant representative:  Anita M. Mosner,<PHONE_NUMBER>             DOT
analyst:  Allen F. Brown,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  None.

	DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved.
                                         Action date:  September 24,
2003

Effective dates of authority granted:  indefinite duration (see below).

Basis for approval:  Bilateral arrangements with Canada and Korea.

Remarks/Conditions:  The code-share authority that we granted is subject
to the following conditions:  1) The Statement of Authorization will
remain in effect only as long as (i) Air Canada, Jazz Air and Asiana,
continue to hold the necessary underlying authority to operate the
code-share services at issue, and (ii) the code-share agreement
providing for the code-share operations remains in effect.  2) Air
Canada, Jazz Air and Asiana must promptly notify the Department (Office
of International Aviation) if the subject agreement providing for these
code-share operations is no longer effective or the carriers decide to
cease operating any or all of the approved services.  (We expect this
notice to be received within ten days of such noneffectiveness or of
such decision and filed in Docket OST 2003-16106).  3) Air Canada, Jazz
Air and Asiana must notify the Department no later than 30 days before
they begin any new code-share service under the code-share services
authorized here.  Such notice shall identify the market(s) to be served,
and the date on which the service will begin.  Such notice should be
filed in Docket OST 2003-16106.  4) The code-share operations conducted
under this authority must comply with 14 CFR Part 257 and with any
amendments to the Department’s regulations concerning code-share
arrangements that may be adopted.  5) Notwithstanding any provisions in
the contract between the subject carriers, our approval here is
expressly conditioned upon the requirements that the subject foreign air
transportation be sold in the name of the carrier holding out the
service in computer reservation systems and elsewhere; that the carrier
selling such transportation (that is, the carrier shown on the ticket)
accept responsibility for the entirety of the code-share journey for all
obligations established in its contract of carriage with the passenger;
and that the passenger liability of the operating carrier be unaffected.
 6) The code-share authority granted here is specifically conditioned so
that neither carrier shall give any force or effect to any contractual
provisions between themselves that are contrary to these conditions.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.

To the extent not granted/deferred/dismissed, we denied all requests in
the referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp


[Federal Register: September 22, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 184)]
[Notices]
[Page 55457-55458]
[DOCID:fr22se06-67]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL06-80-002]

Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.; Notice of
Filing

September 15, 2006.
    Take notice that on September 11, 2006, Midwest Independent
Transmission System Operator, Inc. filed proposed revisions to its Open
Access Transmission and Energy Markets Tariff, FERC Electric Tariff,
Third Revised Volume No. 1 with accompanying explanations pursuant to
the Commissions Order issued August 11, 2006.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on October 2, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-15646 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 109)]
[Notices]
[Page 32492]
[DOCID:fr08jn10-125]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1904-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

Connecticut; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Connecticut (FEMA-1904-DR), dated April 23, 2010, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 28, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Connecticut is hereby amended to include the
Individual Assistance program for the following areas among those areas
determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a
major disaster by the President in his declaration of April 23, 2010.

    New Haven and Windham Counties for Individual Assistance.
    Fairfield, Middlesex, and New London Counties for Individual
Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance, including
direct Federal assistance).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-13744 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33669-33670]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12630]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9947-10-OARM]

National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and
Technology; Notice of Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has determined that, in accordance with the provisions of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C.
    App. 2, the National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and
Technology (NACEPT) is a necessary committee which is in the public
interest. Accordingly, NACEPT will be renewed for an additional two-
year period. The purpose of NACEPT is to provide advice and
recommendations to the Administrator of EPA on a broad range of
environmental policy, technology and management issues. Inquiries may
be directed to Eugene Green, U.S. EPA, (Mail Code 1601M), 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, telephone (202) 564-
2432, or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

    Dated: May 5, 2016.
Donna J. Vizian,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Administration and Resources
Management.
[FR Doc. 2016-12630 Filed 5-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17700-17702]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07304]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-80384; File No. SR-PEARL-2017-16]

Self-Regulatory Organizations: MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend MIAX
PEARL Rules 504 and 516

April 6, 2017.
    Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on April 3, 2017, MIAX PEARL, LLC (``MIAX PEARL''
or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change'') a proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing a proposal to amend Exchange Rules 504 and
516.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://www.miaxoptions.com/rule-filings/pearl at MIAX
PEARL's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference
Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 516, Order Types, to
make changes to paragraph (j) related to Post-Only Order \3\ handling
on the Exchange to simplify order entry and enhance liquidity available
at the open. Additionally, the Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule
504, Trading Halts, to remove Interpretations and Policies .05.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Exchange Rule 516(j).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, by definition, Post-Only Orders on MIAX PEARL do not
participate in the Opening Process,\4\ and Post-Only Orders received
before the Opening Process, during a trading halt, or after the market
close, are rejected.\5\ Additionally, Post-Only Orders that remain on
the Book \6\ after a trading halt under Rule 504 are cancelled.\7\
Post-Only Orders are designed to be liquidity providing orders, as a
Post-Only Order by definition is one that will not remove liquidity
from the Book.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Exchange Rule 503(a)(2) and Rule 516(j).
    \5\ See Exchange Rule 516(j).
    \6\ The term ``Book'' means the electronic order book of buy and
sell orders and quotes maintained by the System. See Exchange Rule
100.
    \7\ See Exchange Rule 504.05.
    \8\ See Exchange Rule 516(j).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange now proposes to amend certain aspects of its handling
of Post-Only Orders to allow them to participate in the Opening Process
and to also allow Post-Only Orders to be received by the Exchange prior
to the commencement of the Opening Process or during a trading halt,
and to remain on the Book after a trading halt, where they may
participate in the next Opening Process.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The Exchange notes that a single Opening Process is used for
Openings and Re-Openings on the Exchange. See Exchange Rule
503(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 516 (j) to allow Post-
Only Orders to participate in the Opening Process by ignoring the Post-
Only instruction on the order during this period. This will allow Post-
Only Orders to participate in the Opening Process by removing the prior
restriction that a Post-Only Order not remove liquidity from the Book.
As proposed, during the Opening Process, Post-Only Orders will be
accepted and provide additional liquidity as orders are matched for
execution based on price-time priority.\10\ The Exchange believes that
removing the prohibition against Post-Only Orders participating in the
Opening Process will serve as a catalyst for Members \11\ to submit
orders during the opening and improve the liquidity available during
the Exchange's Opening Process which may also improve prices at the
opening.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Exchange Rule 503(b)(2)(ii).
    \11\ The term ``Member'' means an individual or organization
that is registered with the Exchange pursuant to Chapter II of the
MIAX PEARL Rules for purposes of trading on the Exchange as an
``Electronic Exchange Member'' or ``Market Maker.'' Members are
deemed ``members'' under the Exchange Act. See Exchange Rule 100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has two classes of Members, Market Makers \12\ and
Electronic Exchange Members.\13\ Market Makers are the primary users of
Post-Only Orders on the Exchange as discussed in more detail below.
Currently, in order to provide liquidity during the Opening Process,
Market Makers must use regular orders, as orders marked Post-Only will
be rejected. After the Opening Process has concluded, Market Makers
switch over to marking orders as Post-Only Orders. Market Makers use
Post-Only Orders to provide two-sided quotes to meet their quoting
obligations as described in more detail below. The Exchange believes
that its proposal to accept Post-Only Orders before the Opening Process
will simplify the operation of the Exchange and reduce complexity for
Members that submit orders during the Opening Process and that switch
to submitting Post-Only Orders during regular trading. Permitting Post-
Only Orders to participate in the Opening will simplify the operational
complexity for Market Makers that wish to provide liquidity during the
Opening Process and thereby improve prices at the open.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The term ``Market Maker'' or ``MM'' means a Member
registered with the Exchange for the purpose of making markets in
options contracts traded on the Exchange and that is vested with the
rights and responsibilities specified in Chapter VI of MIAX PEARL
Rules. See Exchange Rule 100.
    \13\ The term ``Electronic Exchange Member'' or ``EEM'' means
the holder of a Trading Permit who is a Member representing as agent
Public Customer Orders or Non-Customer Orders on the Exchange and
those non-Market Maker Members conducting proprietary trading.
Electronic Exchange Members are deemed ``members'' under the
Exchange Act. See Exchange Rule 100.
    \14\ The Exchange notes that the proposal may primarily benefit
Market Makers as they are the largest users of Post-Only Orders.
However, Post-Only Orders are available for all Members and the
Exchange does not believe that the proposal raises any concerns for
EEMs as the change will benefit any Member that uses Post-Only
Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Market Makers have a heightened obligation on the Exchange to
maintain a two-sided market, pursuant to Rule 605(d)(1), in those
option series in which the Market Maker has registered to trade.\15\
Exchange Rule 605, Market Maker Quotations, details various
requirements associated with a Market

Maker's quotes, such as ``Size Associated with Quotes'', ``Firm
Quotes'', and ``Continuous Quotes''.\16\ A quote on the Exchange is
defined as, ``. . . a bid or offer entered by a Market Maker as a firm
order that updates the Market Maker's previous bid or offer, if any . .
. .'' \17\ The Exchange's definition of a quote further provides that,
``[w]hen the term order is used in these Rules and a bid or offer is
entered by the Market Maker in the option series to which such Market
Maker is registered, such order shall, as applicable, constitute a
quote or quotation for purposes of these Rules.'' \18\ Market Makers
self-assign the series for which they choose to act as a Market Maker
and may register daily for these series.\19\ A Market Maker could
easily have an obligation to provide continuous quotes for a large
number of series. Eliminating the need for Market Makers to switch from
sending regular orders during the Opening Process to Post-Only Orders
after the Opening Process is complete will allow Market Makers to more
efficiently provide liquidity during the Opening Process and seamlessly
transition to regular trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Exchange Rule 604(a)(1).
    \16\ See Exchange Rule 605.
    \17\ See Exchange Rule 100.
    \18\ See Exchange Rule 100.
    \19\ See Exchange Rule 602.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 516(j) to state
that Post-Only Orders are valid during the Opening Process and that
Post-Only Orders received before the Opening Process or during a
trading halt may participate in the next Opening Process. The Exchange
notes that Post-Only Orders received after the market close will
continue to be rejected.
    At the completion of the Opening Process, the Exchange re-
introduces orders that did not execute or that were priced through the
Opening Price.\20\ The Exchange now proposes to also re-introduce Post-
Only Orders that participated in the Opening Process but were not
executed. The Post-Only instruction on such re-introduced Post-Only
Orders will be recognized and the orders will be treated in the same
manner as Post-Only Orders received during a regular trading session,
wherein such orders may not remove liquidity, in accordance with the
existing rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See Exchange Rule 503(b)(2)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, Exchange Rule 504.05 currently provides that Post-Only
Orders that are on the Book will be cancelled when trading in an option
on a security has been halted pursuant to Rule 504. The Exchange now
proposes to eliminate this paragraph in its entirety. As discussed
above, the Exchange is proposing to amend its handling of Post-Only
Orders and will include them in the Opening Process, therefore it is
not necessary to remove Post-Only Orders from the Book when an option
has been halted pursuant to Rule 504, as they may participate in the
next Opening Process.
2. Statutory Basis
    MIAX PEARL believes that its proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \21\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \22\ in particular, in that it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will simplify
its market structure, minimize unnecessary complexity, and encourage
liquidity during the Opening Process. The Exchange believes this change
will make the transition from the opening to regular trading more
efficient and thus promote just and equitable principles of trade and
serve to protect investors and the public interest.
    Additionally, the proposed rule change is consistent with the
current rules of another options exchange.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See Nasdaq Options Rules, Chapter VI, Section 1(e)(11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will
impose any burden on intra-market competition as the Rules apply
equally to all Exchange Members.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on inter-market competition as the proposal is
designed to simplify the complexity of order entry at the open, and
could result in more competitive order flow to the Exchange at the
open.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective
pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \24\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \25\
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-PEARL-2017-16 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PEARL-2017-16. This file
number should be included on the

subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and
review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site
(http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all
subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the
proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all
written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-PEARL-2017-16 and should be submitted on or before May
3, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-07304 Filed 4-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request USEPA/ Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance/ Office of Compliance 2. OMB control number b. G None a. 2060 0043 __ __ __ __

3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. G New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. X Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. X Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. X Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title NESHAP for Inorganic Arsenic Emissions from Glass Manufacturing Plants ( 40 CFR part 61, subpart N) ( Renewal)

8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) ICR Number 1081.08 9. Keywords Glass manufacturing, pot furnace, commercial arsenic, cullet.

10. Abstract This NESHAP affects owners and operators of glass manufacturing plants which use arsenic as a raw material. The owners and operators must submit a one time notification of initial performance test and performance test report, occasional notifications, semiannual reports of excess opacity and flue gas temperature.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. G Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. P Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 16 b. Total annual responses 63 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 10 % c. Total hours requested 3,098 d. Current OMB inventory 4,524 e. Difference ( 1,426)

f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 0 2. Adjustment ( 1,426) 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars) a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs $ 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) $ 56 c. Total annualized cost requested $ 56 d. Current OMB inventory $ 98 e. Difference ($ 42) f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change $ 0 2. Adjustment ($ 42)

15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Application for benefits e. Program planning or management b. Program evaluation f. Research c. General purpose statistics g. P Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. X Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. X Reporting 1. X On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. X Semi annually 6. X Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. X Other ( describe) Initially 17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes X No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Learia A. Williams Phone: ( 202) 564 4113 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3):

( i) Why the information is being collected; ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Michael S. Alushin, Director Compliance Assessment and Media Programs Division Office of Compliance Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Environmental Information Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Dear Mr. Zeller:

My name is Andrew and I am writing as an individual consumer to request an extension of the comment period for the Food and Drug Administration's ("FDA") Proposed Rule Deeming Tobacco Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking and Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the "Proposed Rule") published at 79 Fed. Reg. 23,142 and Federal Register No. 2014-09491. On behalf of myself, I am requesting that the comment period for the Proposed Rule be extended by the FDA for an additional 105 days, from its current 75-day period, to 180 days.

The Proposed Rule raises a number of significant issues and questions that are important and relevant to me, as a consumer of products that are proposed for regulation under the Proposed Rule. The Proposed Rule asks about a hundred different questions I might want to respond to. I want to provide my thoughts and comments on many of these issues, but my time to devote to researching and providing thoughtful comments on these important questions is limited. I have already spent many hours researching and dissecting these issues, but they take time. I know that the FDA took many years to even come up with the Proposed Rule, so I do not think it is at all unreasonable to allow the public a mere six months to comment on it. This is our only opportunity, as consumers, to provide our feedback.

I feel very strongly about e-cigarettes as an alternative to combustible cigarettes and chewing tobacco. Quite simply, I firmly believe that they saved my life and many of my close friends. I wish to provide you with my personal story, as well as science- and evidence-based responses to your questions so that you can take my comment into account. I realize that the FDA has the authority under 21 CFR 10.40 to extend this time frame and that the FDA has exercised this authority on numerous occasions in the past. I would therefore ask that you do so here, so that all stakeholders have the opportunity to provide their comments on this proposed regulation.

I appreciate your consideration of my request and am happy to discuss this issue with you further.

-Andrew


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 226 (Monday, November 23, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 74595-74598]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25689]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0493; Project Identifier 2019-CE-046-AD; Amendment
39-21336; AD 2020-24-06]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Textron Aviation, Inc., (Type
Certificate Previously Held by Cessna Aircraft Company) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD 2019-
08-13 for Textron Aviation, Inc., (type certificate previously held by
Cessna Aircraft Company) Models 525, 525A, and 525B airplanes with
Tamarack Aerospace Group (Tamarack) active load alleviation system
(ATLAS) winglets installed in accordance with Supplemental Type
Certificate (STC) SA03842NY. AD 2019-08-13 was prompted by mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as malfunction of the ATLAS. This AD results from the
identification of corrective actions that, if implemented, allow
operators to reactivate the ATLAS and restore operations to normal
procedures. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective December 28, 2020.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of December 28,
2020.

ADDRESSES: For Cranfield Aerospace Solutions Limited and Tamarack
Aerospace Group service information identified in this AD, contact
Tamarack Aerospace Group, Inc. 2021 Industrial Drive, Sandpoint, Idaho
83864; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
internet: https://tamarackaero.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
It is also available at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0493.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0493; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, the
MCAI, any comments received, and other information. The address for
Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Dzierzynski, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (516) 794-
5531; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2019-08-13, Amendment 39-19634 (84 FR
24007, May 24, 2019) (AD 2019-08-13). AD 2019-08-13 applied to Textron
Aviation, Inc., Models 525, 525A, and 525B airplanes with Tamarack
ATLAS winglets installed in accordance with STC SA03842NY. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on June 2, 2020 (85 FR 33583).
    AD 2019-08-13 prohibited all flight by revising the operating
limitations in the airplane flight manual and fabricating and
installing a placard, until a modification has been incorporated in
accordance with an FAA-approved method. AD 2019-08-13 was based on MCAI
originated by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which
is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union.
EASA issued AD No. 2019-0086-E, dated April 19, 2019, to address an
unsafe condition related to reports of the ATLAS malfunctioning, which
could lead to loss of control of the airplane.
    The NPRM was prompted by EASA's revision to the MCAI. EASA issued
AD No. 2019-0086R1, dated August 9, 2019, to require modifications
previously developed by Cranfield Aerospace Solutions Limited
(Cranfield), the holder of STC SA03842NY, to restore the safety of the
ATLAS design and allow operators to reactivate the ATLAS. In the NPRM,
the FAA proposed to require installing the modified Tamarack Active
Camber Surface (TACS) control unit (TCU) and centering strips and
revising the Tamarack maintenance manual supplement to include
instructions for continued airworthiness relating to the centering
strips. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.
    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0493.

Comments

    The FAA received comments from two commenters. The commenters were
Tamarack and the General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA). The
following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's
response to each comment.

Supportive Comments

    Tamarack and GAMA supported the NPRM.

Request To Revise the Preamble

    Tamarack requested the FAA correct a statement in the preamble of
the NPRM that the April 13, 2019 incident exposed a failure mode of the
ATLAS that was not anticipated during certification. Tamarack commented
this statement in the NPRM implies that only the worst case condition
was tested while other less critical conditions were not. The commenter
further stated that the failure mode that occurred on April 13, 2019
was tested during certification and shown to be recoverable. The
commenter discussed the investigations and flights tests conducted by
EASA and stated this data was reviewed and validated by the FAA before
the FAA issued AD 2019-08-13.
    The FAA partially agrees. The FAA issued AD 2019-08-13 on May 20,
2019. The FAA had received flight path data for the UK incident
aircraft; however, this data did not provide any information about the
operation of the ATLAS system during the incident. Therefore, it was
not considered in the development of the FAA AD. No other information
about the operation of the ATLAS system during this incident has been
provided to the FAA.
    The FAA received the root cause report mentioned by the commenter
on April 22, 2019, which deemed further investigation was warranted to
determine if the actions specified in Cranfield's service bulletin
mitigated the unsafe condition. Many discussions between the FAA and
EASA occurred before and after the issuance of AD 2019-08-13. Given
that the Cranfield service bulletin did not contain adequate
instructions for the use of ``speed tape'' to prevent the TACS from
floating, the FAA found it unacceptable for correcting the unsafe
condition. Instead of delaying action to address the unsafe condition
to wait for testing of the ``speed tape,'' the FAA issued AD 2019-08-13
to ground the affected airplanes, knowing that operators could request
an alternative method of compliance when substantiating data became
available or when the investigation was complete.
    The FAA did not make changes to this AD based on this comment.

Request To Update the STC Holder

    Tamarack requested the FAA update the STC holder and contact
information from Cranfield to Tamarack. The commenter noted that
Cranfield finalized the transfer of STC SA03842NY to Tamarack after the
issuance of AD 2019-08-13.
    The FAA agrees and has updated the references as requested.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety requires adopting the AD as
proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed the following service documents required for
compliance with this AD:
     Cranfield Aerospace Solutions Limited Service Bulletin
CAS/SB1480, Issue A, dated July 2019, which contains instructions to
ensure installation of a modified TCU and the TACS centering strips;
and
     Tamarack Aerospace Group Cessna 525, 525A, & 525B ATLAS
Winglet Maintenance Manual Supplement, Report Number: TAG-1100-0101,
Issue G, dated September 3, 2019, which adds instructions to inspect
the centering strips and adds repetitive inspection intervals to the
Airworthiness Limitations section of the supplement for the centering
strips.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Other Related Service Information

    The FAA also reviewed the following documents related to this AD:
     Cranfield Aerospace Solutions Limited Service Bulletin
CAS/SB1475, Issue A, dated February 2019, which contains the
instructions for installing the centering strips to the TACS,
identified as modification CAeM/Cessna/1475;
     Tamarack Aerospace Group ATLAS Service Bulletin SBATLAS-
57-03, dated July 27, 2018, which contains instructions to remove the
ATLAS TCU and return it to the ATLAS repair facility for modification;
     Tamarack Aerospace Group ATLAS Service Bulletin SBATLAS-
57-05, dated February 20, 2019, which contains instructions to install
centering strips on the TACS; and
     Cranfield Aerospace Solutions Limited Service Bulletin
CAS/SB1467, Issue B, dated July 2018, which contains instructions to
remove the ATLAS TCU assembly and modify it as specified in CAS/SB1480,
Issue A.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD will affect 76 products of U.S.
registry. The FAA also estimates that it will take 16 work-hours with a
parts cost of $4,314 per product to modify the TCU, 24 work-hours with
a parts cost of $199 per product to install the centering strips, and 1
work-hour per product to revise the limitations section as required by
this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, the FAA estimates the cost of this AD on
U.S. operators to be $607,848, or $7,998 per product.
    The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate.
According to the manufacturer, however, some of the costs of this AD
may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected operators.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive 2019-08-13, Amendment 39-19634 (84
FR 24007, May 24, 2019); and
0
b. Adding the following new airworthiness directive:

2020-24-06 Textron Aviation, Inc., (Type Certificate Previously Held
by Cessna Aircraft Company): Amendment 39-21336; Docket No. FAA-
2020-0493; Project Identifier 2019-CE-046-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective December 28,
2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2019-08-13, Amendment 39-19634 (84 FR 24007,
May 24, 2019) (AD 2019-08-13).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Textron Aviation, Inc. (type certificate
previously held by Cessna Aircraft Company) Models 525, 525A, and
525B airplanes, certificated in any category, with Tamarack active
load alleviation system (ATLAS) winglets installed in accordance
with Supplemental Type Certificate SA03842NY.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 27: Flight
Controls.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by the aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as malfunction of
the ATLAS, which could cause difficulty for the pilot to recover the
airplane to safe flight. The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent
malfunction of the ATLAS

and to ensure the Tamarack Active Camber Surface (TACS) remains in a
faired position in the case of inadvertent power loss to the ATLAS,
which could lead to loss of control of the airplane.

 (f) Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions in paragraphs (g)
and (h) of this AD.

(g) Modifications

    Before further flight after the effective date of this AD, do
the following corrective actions:
    (1) Determine whether the serial number of the TACS control unit
(TCU) assembly is listed in table 7.8. of Cranfield Aerospace
Solutions Limited (Cranfield) Service Bulletin CAS/SB1480, Issue A,
dated July 2019 (Cranfield CAS/SB1480, Issue A). If the serial
number of the TCU assembly is not listed in table 7.8., replace the
TCU assembly with a TCU assembly that has a part number listed in
section 5 and a serial number listed in table 7.8 of Cranfield CAS/
SB1480, Issue A.
    (2) Determine whether centering strips have been installed on
the trailing edge of the TACS by following step 7.4. of Cranfield
CAS/SB1480, Issue A. If the trailing edge of the TCAS does not have
centering strips, install Cranfield modification CAeM/Cessna/1475.

(h) Revision to the Maintenance Manual Supplement

    (1) Before further flight after the effective date of this AD,
revise the Airworthiness Limitations section (ALS) and Instructions
for Continued Airworthiness for your airplane by adding the updates
in Tamarack Aerospace Group Cessna 525, 525A & 525B ATLAS Winglet
Maintenance Manual Supplement, Report Number: TAG-1100-0101, Issue
G, dated September 3, 2019.
    (2) Thereafter, except as provided in paragraph (i) of this AD,
no alternative inspection intervals may be approved for the
centering strips. Inserting a later issue of the ALS with language
identical to that contained in Issue G for the centering strips is
acceptable for compliance with the requirements of this paragraph.
    (3) The airplane flight manual revision and placard required by
AD 2019-08-13, if installed, may be removed after completing the
modifications required by paragraph (g) of this AD.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, New York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continued Operational Safety FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone: (516) 287-
7321; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

 (j) Related Information

    Refer to European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.
2019-0086R1, dated August 9, 2019, for related information. You may
examine the MCAI on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0493.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Cranfield Aerospace Solutions Limited Service Bulletin CAS/
SB1480, Issue A, dated July 2019.
    (ii) Tamarack Aerospace Group Cessna 525, 525A, & 525B ATLAS
Winglet Maintenance Manual Supplement, Report Number: TAG-1100-0101,
Issue G, dated September 3, 2019.
    (3) For Cranfield Aerospace Solutions Limited and Tamarack
Aerospace Group service information identified in this AD, contact
Tamarack Aerospace Group, Inc. 2021 Industrial Drive, Sandpoint,
Idaho 83864; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet: https://tamarackaero.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on November 13, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-25689 Filed 11-20-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: September 27, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 187)]
[Notices]
[Page 54903-54904]
[DOCID:fr27se07-47]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0013, FRL-8473-8]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Title IV of the Public Health
Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002:
Drinking Water Security and Safety (Renewal); EPA ICR No. 2103.03; OMB
No. 2040-0253

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)(44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below, describes the
nature of the information collection and its estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments must be submitted on or before October 29,
2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-
2003-0013, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA

Docket Center, Water Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode:
2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB by mail to: Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara Johnson, Water Security Division,
Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, Mailcode: 4608T,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number: 202-
566-0055; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On July 25, 2007 (72 FR 40851), EPA sought comments on this
ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments during the
comment period. Any additional comments on this ICR should be submitted
to EPA and OMB within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0013, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Water Docket in

the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from
8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Water Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://www.regulations.gov
, to submit or view public comments, access the

index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA

receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov
.

    Title: Title IV of the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism
Preparedness and Response Act of 2002: Drinking Water Security and
Safety (Renewal).
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 2103.03, OMB Control No. 2040-0253.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on September 30, 2007.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: The Bioterrorism Act requires each community water system
serving a population of more than 3,300 people to conduct a
vulnerability assessment of its water system and to prepare or revise
an emergency response plan that incorporates the results of the
vulnerability assessment. These requirements are mandatory under the
statute. EPA will use the information collected under this ICR to
determine whether community water systems have conducted vulnerability
assessments and prepared or revised emergency response plans in
compliance with that Act. EPA is required to protect all vulnerability
assessments and all information derived from them from disclosure to
unauthorized parties and has established an Information Protection
Protocol describing how that will be accomplished.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 237
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Community Water Systems serving a
population of more than 3,300 people.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 80.
    Frequency of Response: Once.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 8,994.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $710,460, including $294 in annual O&M
costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 2,904,935 hours in
the total estimated respondent burden compared with that identified in
the OMB Inventory of Approved Burdens. This decrease reflects EPA's
need to collect documents that were included in the original estimate,
but still remain to be submitted to the Agency.

    Dated: September 21, 2007
Joseph A. Sierra,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
 [FR Doc. E7-19124 Filed 9-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11187-11188]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4299]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[Docket No. DOT-OST-2011-0170]

Request for Comments of a Previously Approved Information
Collection

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below is being forwarded to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comments. A
Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on the following information collection was published on
September 16, 2011 (76 FR 57795).

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 26, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aleta Best, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs (X-55), Office of the
Secretary, W86-498, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Disclosure of Code Sharing Arrangements and Long-Term Wet
Leases.
    OMB Control Number: 2105-0537.
    Type of Request: Renewal of a Previously Approved Information
Collection.
    Abstract: Codesharing is the name given to a common airline
industry marketing practice where, by mutual agreement between
cooperating carriers, at least one of the airline designator codes used
on a flight is different from that of the airline operating the
aircraft. In one version, two or more airlines each use their own
designator codes on the same aircraft operation. Although only one
airline operates the flight, each airline in a codesharing arrangement
may hold out, market, and sell the flight as its own in published
schedules. Codesharing also refers to the arrangements, such as when a
code on a passenger's ticket is not that of the operator of the flight,
but where the operator does not also hold out the service in its own
name. Such codesharing arrangements are common between commuter air
carriers and their larger affiliates, and the number of arrangements
between U.S. air carriers and foreign air carriers has also been
increasing. Arrangements falling into this category are similar to
leases of aircraft with crew (wet leases).
    The Department recognizes the strong preference of air travelers
for on-line service (service by a single carrier) on connecting flights
over interline service (service by multiple carriers). Codesharing
arrangements are, in part, a marketing response to this demand for on-
line service. Often, codesharing partners offer services similar to
those available for on-line connections with the goal of offering
``seamless'' service (i.e., service where the transfers from flight to
flight or airline to airline are facilitated). For example, they may
locate gates near each other to make connections more convenient or
coordinate baggage handling to give greater assurance that baggage will
be properly handled. Codesharing arrangements can help airlines operate
more efficiently because they can reduce costs by providing a joint
service with one aircraft rather than operating separate services with
two aircraft. Particularly in thin markets, this efficiency can lead to
increased price and service options for consumers or enable the use of
equipment sized appropriately for the market. Therefore, the Department
recognizes that codesharing, as well as long-term wet leases, can offer
significant economic benefits.
    Although codesharing and wet-lease arrangements can offer
significant consumer benefits, they can also be misleading unless
consumers know that the transportation they are considering for
purchase will not be provided by the airline whose designator code is
shown on the ticket, schedule, or itinerary and unless they know the
identity of the airline on which they will be flying. The growth in the
use of codesharing, wetleasing, and similar marketing tools,
particularly in international air transportation, had given the
Department concern about whether the then-current disclosure rules (14
CFR 399.88) protected the public interest adequately and led the
Department to adopt specific regulations requiring the disclosure of
code-sharing arrangements and long-term wet leases on March 15, 1999.
(14 CFR part 257)
    These regulations required U.S. airlines, foreign airlines and
travel agents doing business in the United States, to notify passengers
of the existence of code-sharing or long-term wet lease arrangements.
It also required U.S. airlines, foreign airlines and travel agents to
tell prospective consumers, in all oral communications before booking
transportation, that the transporting airline is not the airline whose
designator code will appear on travel documents and identify the
transporting airline by its corporate name and any other name under
which that service is held out to the public.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 16,000, excluding travelers.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 300 million (estimated number of
passengers who may be traveling on a codeshare or wet-lease ticket).
    Annual Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: Annual reporting burden
for this data collection is estimated at 618,750 hours for all travel
agents and airline ticket agents, based on 15 seconds per phone call
and an average of 1.5 phone calls per trip, for the approximately 33%
of codeshare itineraries that involve personal contact. Most of this
data collection (third party notification) is accomplished through
highly automated computerized systems.
    The estimated burden has changed from the previous collection based
on adjustments to the set of respondents and changes to the number of
annual airline passengers.
    Frequency of Collection: Collection occurs at the time a passenger
books an airline ticket.
    ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding the burden estimate, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Office of Management and
Budget,

Attention: Desk Officer for the Office of the Secretary of
Transportation, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.

    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1:48.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 17, 2012.
Patricia Lawton,
Departmental PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4299 Filed 2-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 208 (Monday, October 28, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64170-64172]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25191]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30926; Amdt. No. 3561]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective October 28, 2013. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of October 28, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800

Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability_All SIAPs are available online free of charge. Visit
nfdc.faa.gov to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP copies may be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Dunham III, Flight
Procedure Standards Branch (AFS-420)Flight Technologies and Programs
Division, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration,
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by amending the referenced SIAPs.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP is listed on the
appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National Flight Data
Center (FDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is incorporated
by reference in the amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and
Sec.  97.20 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use the regulatory
text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction on charts
printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP contained in FAA form documents is
unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR sections and
specifies the types of SIAP and the corresponding effective dates. This
amendment also identifies the airport and its location, the procedure
and the amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP as amended in the transmittal. For safety and
timeliness of change considerations, this amendment incorporates only
specific changes contained for each SIAP as modified by FDC/P-NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs, as modified by FDC P-NOTAM, and contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these changes to
SIAPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific conditions
existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in this rule
have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an emergency
action of immediate flight safety relating directly to published
aeronautical charts. The circumstances which created the need for all
these SIAP amendments requires making them effective in less than 30
days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs
and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and public procedure
before adopting these SIAPs are impracticable and contrary to the
public interest and, where applicable, that good cause exists for
making these SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 11, 2013.
John Duncan,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal regulations, Part 97, 14 CFR part 97, is amended by
amending Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, effective at 0901 UTC
on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

Sec. Sec.  97.23, 97.25, 97.27, 97.29, 97.31, 97.33 and
97.35  [Amended]

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:
    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SIAPs; Sec.  97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SIAPs, Identified as follows:

* * * Effective Upon Publication

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      AIRAC date          State           City            Airport        FDC No.      FDC Date       Subject
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11/14/13.............  FL           St Augustine....  Northeast             3/5330     10/10/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Florida Rgnl.                              13, Orig-A.
11/14/13.............  FL           St Augustine....  Northeast             3/5331     10/10/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Florida Rgnl.                              31, Amdt 1A.
11/14/13.............  FL           St Augustine....  Northeast             3/5332     10/10/13  ILS OR LOC/DME
                                                       Florida Rgnl.                              RWY 31, Orig-
                                                                                A.
11/14/13.............  TX           Lufkin..........  Angelina County       3/6808     10/10/13  VOR RWY 33,
                                                                                Amdt 14A.
11/14/13.............  VA           Farmville.......  Farmville Rgnl.       3/6811     10/10/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                21, Orig-A.

11/14/13.............  SD           Rapid City......  Rapid City Rgnl       3/6866     10/10/13  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                                                32, Amdt 19.
11/14/13.............  SD           Rapid City......  Rapid City Rgnl       3/6875     10/10/13  VOR OR TACAN
                                                                                RWY 32, Amdt
                                                                                24E.
11/14/13.............  SD           Rapid City......  Rapid City Rgnl       3/6879     10/10/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                32, Amdt 1A.
11/14/13.............  SD           Rapid City......  Rapid City Rgnl       3/6882     10/10/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                14, Amdt 2.
11/14/13.............  SD           Rapid City......  Rapid City Rgnl       3/6883     10/10/13  VOR OR TACAN
                                                                                RWY 14, Orig-
                                                                                E.
11/14/13.............  IN           La Porte........  La Porte Muni..       3/7124     10/10/13  LOC/NDB RWY 2,
                                                                                Amdt 1B.
11/14/13.............  GA           Toccoa..........  Toccoa RG             3/8388     10/10/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Letourneau                                 20, Amdt 1.
                                                       Field.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2013-25191 Filed 10-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 73007-73008]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28163]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 80

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0479; FRL-9919-92-OAR]

Delay in Issuing 2014 Standards for the Renewable Fuel Standard
Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notification of delay in issuing standards.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing that
it will not be finalizing 2014 applicable percentage standards under
the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program before the end of 2014. In
light of this delay in issuing the 2014 RFS standards, the compliance
demonstration deadline for the 2013 RFS standards will take place in
2015. EPA will be making modifications to the EPA-Moderated Transaction
System (EMTS) to ensure that Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs)
generated in 2012 are valid for demonstrating compliance with the 2013
applicable standards.

DATES: December 9, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia MacAllister, Office of
Transportation and Air Quality, Assessment and Standards Division,
Environmental Protection Agency, 2000 Traverwood Drive, Ann Arbor, MI
48105; Telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
Email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 29, 2013, at 78 FR 71732, EPA
published a notice of proposed rulemaking to establish the 2014 RFS
standards.\1\ The proposal has generated significant comment and
controversy, particularly about how volumes should

be set in light of lower gasoline consumption than had been forecast at
the time that the Energy Independence and Security Act was enacted, and
whether and on what basis the statutory volumes should be waived. Most
notably, commenters expressed concerns regarding the proposal's ability
to ensure continued progress towards achieving the volumes of renewable
fuel targeted by the statute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 78 FR 71732, November 29, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA has been evaluating these issues in light of the purposes of
the statute and the Administration's commitment to the goals of the
statute to increase the use of renewable fuels, particularly cellulosic
biofuels, which will reduce the greenhouse gases emitted from the
consumption of transportation fuels and diversify the nation's fuel
supply.
    Finalization of the 2014 standards rule has been significantly
delayed. Due to this delay, and given ongoing consideration of the
issues presented by the commenters, EPA is not in a position to
finalize the 2014 RFS standards rule before the end of the year.
Accordingly, we intend to take action on the 2014 standards rule in
2015 prior to or in conjunction with action on the 2015 standards
rule.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ EPA intends to adjust the schedule for compliance reporting
for the 2014 RFS standards in 40 CFR 80.1451(a)(1) to reflect the
delay in issuing the final 2014 RFS standards rule. No compliance
reporting is necessary absent a final 2014 standards rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA intends to modify EMTS to permit the trading and retiring of
2012 vintage RINs beyond December 31, 2014. EPA will incorporate the
modifications into EMTS version 4.1, which is scheduled to be deployed
by April 1, 2015. From January 1, 2015 until the release of version
4.1, EMTS will not be able to support 2012 RIN transactions. Please
note that 2012 RIN holding data stored in EMTS is safe and will be
preserved even though it will not be accessible during the period from
January 1, 2015 until the release of version 4.1.

    Dated: November 21, 2014.
Janet G. McCabe,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2014-28163 Filed 12-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


TABLE 1: MACT ALLOWABLES FOR HALOGENATED SOLVENT CLEANER POPULATION Cancer Risk Facilitiy ID Machine Number Company State Machine Type Compliance Option HAP 3 Solvent Use ( kg/ yr) Pre

/ Post

MACT Solvent/ Air Interface Area ( m2) Estimated Post MACT Emissions ( kg/ yr) Estimation Method 4 MACT Allowables ( kg/ year) Difference Between MACT Allowables and Modeled Emissions ( kg/ year)

2.6E 04 36 1 1 Central Moloney AR Batch Vapor Equip PCE 29,320.7 Post 4.65 24,043 2a 24,091 48 2.6E 04 36 1 2 Central Moloney AR Batch Vapor Equip PCE 35,724.0 Post 2.23 29,294 2a 11,564  17,730 1.4E 04 37 1 1 Greenville Tube AR Batch Vapor Equip TCE 79,120.0 Post 5.20 64,878 2a 26,982  37,897 4.7E 05 115 1 1 Mid States Rubber IN In Line Equip PCE 18,143.7  5.02 14,878 2a 24,919 10,042 3.2E 05 54 1 1 Parkview Metal Products TX In Line Overall TCE 26,943.4 Post 22.21 24,207 1a 40,769 16,562 2.8E 05 125 1 1 The Selmer Company/ Vincent Bach Div. IN Batch Cold Equip TCE 66,224.5   54,657 5

2.1E 05 112 1 1 Lincoln Foodservice Products IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 24,644.1  4.94 20,208 2a 25,620 5,412 2.1E 05 112 1 2 Lincoln Foodservice Products IN In Line Equip TCE 58,174.1  20.81 47,703 2a 103,370 55,667 1.7E 05 39 1 5 American Airlines OK Batch Vapor Overall TCE 4,980.0 Post 6.69 12,977 1b 12,041  936 1.7E 05 39 1 6 American Airlines OK Batch Vapor Idle TCE 4,989.5 Post  4,091 2b

1.7E 05 39 1 7 American Airlines OK Batch Vapor Idle PCE 3,991.6 Post  3,273 2b

1.7E 05 39 1 8 American Airlines OK Batch Vapor Idle PCE 9,979.0 Post  8,183 2b

1.7E 05 39 1 9 American Airlines OK Batch Vapor Idle PCE 9,979.0 Post  8,183 2b

1.7E 05 39 1 10 American Airlines OK Batch Vapor Idle PCE 11,974.8 Post  9,819 2b

1.7E 05 39 1 11 American Airlines OK Batch Vapor  TCE 1,995.8 Post  1,637 2b

1.7E 05 95 1 1 Ford Electronics & Refrigeration IN In Line Equip TCE 24,947.6  14.49 20,457 2a 71,990 51,533 1.4E 05 40 4 1 Boeing Company WA Batch Vapor Overall PCE 2,701.6 Post  1,999 1a

1.4E 05 40 4 3 Boeing Company WA Batch Vapor Equip TCE 6,850.6 Post 5.57 5,617 2a 28,909 23,292 1.2E 05 151 1 1 HTB, Inc. WA Batch Vapor Equip PCE 4,835.3 Pre 4.65 1,361 3a 24,091 22,730 1.2E 05 153 1 1 LE Wilson, Inc WA Batch Vapor Equip PCE 1,995.8 Pre 0.17 1,996 1a 1,495  501 1.1E 05 97 1 1 Gilpin Ironworks IN Batch Cold Equip TCE 15,195.3   11,316 5

7.8E 06 121 1 1 Raybestos Products, Co. IN In Line Equip TCE 23,397.2  4.10 19,186 2a 20,366 1,180 7.8E 06 121 1 2 Raybestos Products, Co. IN In Line Equip TCE 23,397.2  4.10 19,186 2a 20,366 1,180 7.8E 06 121 1 3 Raybestos Products, Co. IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 23,397.2  4.60 19,186 2a 23,857 4,671 7.0E 06 108 1 1 K. C. L. Corp. IN Batch Cold Equip PCE 2,695.7   1,894 5

6.9E 06 111 1 1 K T Corp. IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 22,226.0  3.16 18,225 2a 16,382  1,844 6.5E 06 31 2 1 DOD  Tinker AFB OK Batch Vapor Overall PCE 8,182.8 Post 3.72 7,688 1b 6,688  1,000 6.5E 06 31 2 5 DOD  Tinker AFB OK Batch Vapor Overall PCE 358.8 Post 0.00 312 1b

5.7E 06 114 1 1 McDowell Enterprises, Inc. IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 5,851.3  8.55 4,798 2a 44,341 39,543 5.6E 06 81 1 1 CMW, Inc. IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 2,268.0  1.55 1,860 2a 8,044 6,184 4.9E 06 22 1 1 Lighting Sevices Inc. NY Batch Vapor Equip TCE 7,801.8 Post 1.32 6,397 2a 6,718 321 4.6E 06 42 1 1 Nordam Repair Div. OK Batch Vapor Overall TCE 5,990.7 Post 5.23 4,028 1a 9,414 5,386 4.3E 06 86 2 1 Delphi Delco Electronics Systems IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 4,762.7  1.14 3,667 2a 5,786 2,119 4.2E 06 61 1 1 Wolverine Tube  Tube Forming, Inc. TX Batch Vapor Equip TCE 10,098.8 Post 4.41 8,281 2a 22,870 14,589 4.2E 06 61 1 2 Wolverine Tube  Tube Forming, Inc. TX Batch Vapor Equip TCE 23,949.7 Pre 4.41 6,741 3a 22,870 16,129 4.1E 06 102 1 1 Horner Electric Inc. IN Batch Vapor Idle TCE 7,269.7  0.97 5,598 2a 4,926  672 3.6E 06 117 1 1 Oak Rite Mfg. Corp. IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 5,388.7  1.67 4,419 2a 8,669 4,251 3.2E 06 124 1 1 South Bend Controls, Inc. IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 6,940.0  0.65 5,344 2a 5,555 211 3.1E 06 100 1 1 Hitachi Cable Indiana, Inc. IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 5,443.1  0.42 4,191 2a 3,615  576 3.0E 06 59 1 1 U. S. Brass TX Batch Vapor Equip TCE 3,644.2 Post  2,988 2b

2.7E 06 147 1 1 Art Brass Plating, Inc. WA Batch Vapor Equip TCE 9,001.1 Pre 1.49 2,533 3a 7,566 5,032 2.3E 06 60 1 1 Victor Equipment TX In Line Equip TCE 9,280.5 Post 0.00 7,146 2a

2.2E 06 109 1 1 Keco Engineered Coatings, Inc. IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 4,490.6  1.14 3,458 2a 5,806 2,348 2.1E 06 123 1 1 Remote Controls, Inc. IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 2,752.4  1.36 2,257 2a 6,922 4,665 1.9E 06 154 1 1 MANCO Mfg WA Batch Vapor Overall TCE 1,836.8 Post 12.60 1,647 1a 22,680 21,033 1.8E 06 3 1 1 B. G. Sulzle NY Batch Vapor Equip TCE 4,989.5 Pre 0.31 2,171 3a 2,757 586 1.8E 06 3 1 2 B. G. Sulzle NY Batch Vapor Equip TCE 2,721.6 Pre 0.54 1,184 3a 4,629 3,445 1.8E 06 92 1 1 Elsa Corporation IN Batch Vapor Idle TCE 3,765.7  1.67 3,088 2a 8,673 5,585 6 8/ 14/ 2006 TABLE 1: MACT ALLOWABLES FOR HALOGENATED SOLVENT CLEANER POPULATION Cancer Risk Facilitiy ID Machine Number Company State Machine Type Compliance Option HAP 3 Solvent Use ( kg/ yr) Pre

/ Post

MACT Solvent/ Air Interface Area ( m2) Estimated Post MACT Emissions ( kg/ yr) Estimation Method 4 MACT Allowables ( kg/ year) Difference Between MACT Allowables and Modeled Emissions ( kg/ year)

1.7E 06 6 1 1 Carter Spray Finishing NY Batch Vapor Overall TCE 3,311.0 Post 2.23 3,146 1a 4,014 868 1.5E 06 56 1 1 R. E. Dye Manufacturing TX Batch Vapor Overall TCE 741.5 Post 1.70 742 1a 3,052 2,311 1.4E 06 2 1 1 Auburn Technology NY Batch Vapor Idle TCE 600.0 Post 1.59 1,127 1b 8,246 7,118 1.3E 06 4 1 1 Brainerd NY Batch Vapor Equip TCE 2,268.0 Post 1.20 1,746 2a 6,109 4,363 1.3E 06 129 1 1 Caddock OR Batch Cold Equip PCE 226.8 Post 0.52 163 5 172 9 1.3E 06 129 1 2 Caddock OR Batch Cold Equip PCE 226.8 Post 0.52 163 5 172 9 1.3E 06 150 1 1 Exotic Metals Forming Co. WA Batch Vapor Overall TCE 4,608.0 Post 2.90 4,143 1b 5,220 1,077 1.2E 06 122 1 1 Redi Strip of New Albany, Inc. IN Batch Cold Equip MC 3,628.7   3,097 5

1.2E 06 122 1 2 Redi Strip of New Albany, Inc. IN Batch Cold Equip MC 2,721.6   2,323 5

1.2E 06 122 1 3 Redi Strip of New Albany, Inc. IN Batch Cold Equip MC 4,535.9   3,871 5

1.2E 06 122 1 4 Redi Strip of New Albany, Inc. IN Batch Cold Equip MC 453.6   387 5

1.2E 06 122 1 5 Redi Strip of New Albany, Inc. IN Batch Cold Equip MC 453.6   387 5

1.0E 06 16 1 5 Indium Corp of America NY Batch Cold Equip MC 2,721.6 Pre  2,393 5

8 1 1 Dover Findings NY Batch Vapor Overall TCE 272.2 Pre 0.27 97 4a 483 386 12 1 1 Gary Syracuse NY Batch Cold Equip TCA    227 1b

14 1 1 Hitemco Div. Of Barson Composites NY Batch Vapor Equip TCE 1,236.9 Post  1,014 2b

19 1 1 Keywell LLC NY In Line Overall TCE 2,702.0 Pre 5.23 2,702 1b 9,602 6,900 31 3 1 DOD  Kelly AFB TX Batch Vapor Equip PCE 3,218.2 Post 2.04 2,639 2a 10,600 7,961 31 3 2 DOD  Kelly AFB TX Batch Vapor Equip PCE 700.8 Post 2.60 575 2a 13,491 12,916 31 3 4 DOD  Kelly AFB TX Batch Vapor Equip PCE 152.0 Post  125 2b

31 3 5 DOD  Kelly AFB TX Batch Vapor Equip PCE 103.4 Post  85 2b

31 3 6 DOD  Kelly AFB TX Batch Vapor Equip PCE 4,558.6 Post  3,738 2b

31 5 1 DOD  Puget Sound Naval Shipyard WA Batch Vapor Overall TCE   2.79 668 1b 5,022 4,354 38 1 1 DOE  Sandia NL NM Batch Vapor Overall TCE 77.5 Post 0.25 78 1a 450 373 38 1 2 DOE  Sandia NL NM Batch Vapor Overall TCE 79.5 Post 0.74 79 1a 1,332 1,253 38 1 4 DOE  Sandia NL NM Closed Loop Overall PCE 27.6 Post  27 1a

44 1 2 Dallas Airmotive TX Batch Vapor Overall TCE 2,083.3 Post 1.65 1,527 1a 2,977 1,450 45 1 1 Dallas Semiconductor TX Batch Vapor Equip MC 1,632.9 Post 0.14 1,257 2a 1,212  45 49 1 1 J& S Plating and Repair TX Batch Vapor Overall TCE 280.9 Post 0.25 183 1a 452 269 49 1 2 J& S Plating and Repair TX Batch Vapor Overall TCE 806.7 Post 0.37 735 1a 659  76 53 1 1 Northrop Gruman TX Closed Loop Overall PCE 777.6 Post 0.00 1,044 1b

57 2 1 Texas Aero Engine Service TX Batch Vapor  TCE 2,553.7 Post  2,094 2b

73 1 1 Stennis Space Center MS Batch Vapor Overall TCA 818.4 Post 2.97 818 1a 5,346 4,528 75 1 1 A. O. Smith/ Uppco IN Batch Cold Equip TCE 90.7   68 5

78 1 1 Auspro Mfg. Co. IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 453.6  0.39 349 2a 3,522 3,173 79 1 2 Bridon American Corp. IN Batch Vapor Overall TCA 269.0  1.79 221 2a 3,216 2,995 80 1 1 Calflex IN Batch Vapor Overall TCE 544.3  1.26 446 2a 2,265 1,818 81 1 2 CMW, Inc. IN In Line Overall TCE 6,803.9  4.02 5,579 2a 7,379 1,800 82 1 1 Commercial Plating Co., Inc. IN Batch Vapor Equip PCE 366.5  0.27 282 2a 2,404 2,122 82 1 2 Commercial Plating Co., Inc. IN Batch Cold Equip PCE 29.0   20 5

83 1 1 Core Tech IN Batch Vapor Idle TCE 1,496.9  0.56 1,153 2a 4,761 3,609 84 1 1 Craddock Finishing Corp. IN Batch Vapor Idle TCE 1,028.7  0.83 792 2a 4,223 3,431 85 1 1 Craftsman Coating Co. IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 101.3  1.02 78 2a 5,202 5,124 87 1 1 Douglass Electric Motor Repair IN Batch Cold Equip TCE 244.9   194 5

88 1 1 Electric Motors & Specialties, Inc. IN Batch Cold Equip MC 45.4   35 5

90 1 1 Elkhart Products IN Batch Cold Equip TCE 1,347.2   1,003 5

91 1 1 Elliott Company of Indianapolis IN Batch Cold Equip TCE 20.9   17 5

93 1 1 F& F Screw Machine Products, Inc. IN Batch Vapor Overall TCE 718.5  0.29 553 2a 530  24 94 1 1 Federal Mogul, Corp. IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 1,134.0  0.84 873 2a 4,275 3,402 98 1 1 Hand Industries, Inc. IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 743.9  0.56 573 2a 4,761 4,188 7 8/ 14/ 2006 TABLE 1: MACT ALLOWABLES FOR HALOGENATED SOLVENT CLEANER POPULATION Cancer Risk Facilitiy ID Machine Number Company State Machine Type Compliance Option HAP 3 Solvent Use ( kg/ yr) Pre

/ Post

MACT Solvent/ Air Interface Area ( m2) Estimated Post MACT Emissions ( kg/ yr) Estimation Method 4 MACT Allowables ( kg/ year) Difference Between MACT Allowables and Modeled Emissions ( kg/ year)

99 1 1 Hansen Corp. IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 181.4  1.55 149 2a 8,027 7,878 101 1 1 Hoosier Tire and Rubber IN Batch Cold Equip MC 272.2   232 5

104 1 1 IDX, Inc. IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 158.8  0.19 122 2a 1,721 1,598 105 1 1 Indiana Metal Coatings, Inc. IN In Line Equip MC 23,859.0  9.30 19,564 2a 46,195 26,631 105 1 2 Indiana Metal Coatings, Inc. IN In Line Equip MC 9,770.4  15.40 8,012 2a 76,495 68,484 105 1 3 Indiana Metal Coatings, Inc. IN In Line Equip MC 6,194.7  23.00 5,080 2a 114,246 109,167 106 1 1 Jasper Engine Exchange, Inc. IN Batch Cold Equip MC 1,360.8   1,161 5

106 1 2 Jasper Engine Exchange, Inc. IN Batch Cold Equip MC 1,134.0   968 5

107 1 1 K and I Hard Chrome, Inc. IN Batch Vapor Overall TCE 453.6   372 2b

110 1 1 Ken Koat, Inc. IN Batch Vapor Idle TCA 3,175.1  1.39 2,604 2a 7,093 4,489 113 1 1 Machine Rite Products IN Batch Vapor Equip TCE 3,628.7  1.39 2,976 2a 7,093 4,117 116 1 1 Monarch Specialty Systems, Inc. IN Batch Vapor  TCE 399.2  2.13 327 2a

118 1 1 Pettifor's, Inc. IN Batch Vapor Idle TCE 30.2  0.82 23 2a 4,184 4,160 119 1 1 Precisioneering, Inc. IN Batch Vapor Overall TCA 399.2  0.22 307 2a 393 85 130 1 1 Color Tech Division of ASKO OR Batch Vapor Overall TCE 1,306.0 Post 1.95 1,306 1a 3,512 2,206 130 1 1 ASKO Processing WA Batch Vapor Equip TCE 4,989.5 Pre 2.79 1,835 3a 14,455 12,620 133 1 1 Electro Chem Metal Finishing OR Batch Vapor Equip TCE 1,197.5 Post 0.93 922 2a 4,729 3,807 141 1 1 Portland Public School OR Batch Vapor Overall TCA 208.7 Post 0.56 209 1a 1,003 795 144 1 1 Tektronix OR Batch Vapor Overall TCE 219.5 Post 0.56 221 1b 1,003 783 145 1 1 Vispro OR Batch Vapor Overall TCE 504.0 Post 0.36 504 1a 651 147 145 1 2 Vispro OR Batch Vapor Overall TCE 138.8 Post 0.19 139 1a 334 196 148 1 1 Battelle WA Batch Vapor Overall TCA 326.4 Post 0.52 322 1b 936 614 152 1 1 Johnson Matthey WA Batch Vapor Overall MC 15,465.7 Pre 0.11 45 1b 195 150 TOTAL 1,098,751 598,172 8 8/ 14/ 2006