Authority: 42 U.S.C. 300f, 300g-1, 300g-2, 300g-3, 300g-4, 300g-
5, 300g-6, 300j-4, 300j-9, and 300j-11.

0
2. Amend Sec.  141.151 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a), (c), and (f); and
0
b. Adding paragraph (g).
    The revisions and additions read as follows:

Sec.  141.151  Purpose and applicability of this subpart.

    (a) This subpart establishes the minimum requirements for the
content of reports that community water systems must deliver to their
customers. These reports must contain information on the quality of the
water delivered by the systems and characterize the risks (if any) from
exposure to contaminants detected in the drinking water in an accurate
and understandable manner. This subpart also establishes minimum
requirements large systems must include in plans to provide meaningful
access to these reports for limited English-proficient consumers.
* * * * *
    (c) For the purpose of this subpart, customers are defined as
billing units or service connections to which water is delivered by a
community water system. For the purposes of this subpart, consumers are
defined as people served by the water system, including customers, and
people that do not receive a bill.
* * * * *
    (f) For purpose of this subpart, the term ``primacy agency'' refers
to the State or tribal government entity that has jurisdiction over,
and primary enforcement responsibility for, public water systems, even
if that government

does not have interim or final primary enforcement responsibility for
this rule. Where the State or tribe does not have primary enforcement
responsibility for public water systems, the term ``primacy agency''
refers to the appropriate EPA regional office.
    (g) The reports must not contain false or misleading statements or
representations.
0
3. Amend Sec.  141.152 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading and paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and
(d)(1);
0
b. Removing the period at the end of paragraph (d)(2) and adding ``;
and'' in its place; and
0
c. Adding paragraph (d)(3).
    The revisions and additions read as follows:

Sec.  141.152  Compliance dates.

    (a) Between [EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE], and [DATE 1 YEAR AFTER
PUBLICATION DATE OF FINAL RULE], community water systems must comply
with Sec. Sec.  141.151 through 141.155, as codified in 40 CFR part
141, subpart O, on July 1, 2023. Beginning April 1, 2025, community
water systems must comply with Sec. Sec.  141.151 through 141.156.
    (b) Each existing community water system must deliver reports
according to Sec.  141.155 by July 1 each year. Each report delivered
by July 1 must contain data collected during the previous calendar
year, or the most recent calendar year before the previous calendar
year.
    (c) A new community water system must deliver its first report by
July 1 of the year after its first full calendar year in operation.
    (d) * * *
    (1) By April 1, 2025 and annually thereafter; or
* * * * *
    (3) A community water system that sells water to another community
water system that is required to provide reports biannually according
to Sec.  141.155(i) must provide the applicable information required in
Sec.  141.155(j) by October 1, 2025, to the buyer system, and annually
thereafter, or a date mutually agreed upon by the seller and the
purchaser, included in a contract between the parties.
0
4. Amend Sec.  141.153 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a) and (b)(2);
0
b. Adding paragraphs (c)(1)(iii) and (c)(3)(v);
0
c. Revising paragraph (c)(4) introductory text;
0
d. Adding paragraph (c)(5);
0
e. Revising paragraphs (d)(1)(i) and (ii);
0
f. Removing paragraph (d)(1)(iii);
0
g. Revising paragraphs (d)(2), (d)(3) introductory text, (d)(3)(i),
(d)(4), (d)(4)(iii) and (iv), and (d)(4)(iv)(B);
0
h. Removing paragraph (d)(4)(iv)(C);
0
i. Removing and reserving paragraphs (d)(4)(vii) and (viii);
0
j. Revising paragraphs (d)(4)(ix) and (x);
0
k. Removing paragraphs (d)(4)(xi) and (xii);
0
l. Revising paragraphs (d)(5), (6), and (7);
0
m. Adding paragraph (d)(8);
0
n. Revising paragraphs (e)(1) introductory text, (f) introductory text,
(f)(2) and (3), (h)(1)(i), (h)(1)(ii) introductory text, (h)(1)(ii)(B)
and (E), (h)(1)(iii) and (iv), (h)(2) and (3);
0
o. Revising paragraphs (h)(6) introductory text, (h)(6)(i) introductory
text, (h)(7) introductory text, (h)(7)(i) introductory text,
(h)(7)(i)(A) through (C), (h)(7)(i)(D)(1), (h)(7)(ii) introductory
text, (h)(7)(ii)(A) and (B), (h)(7)(ii)(C)(2), and (h)(7)(iii)(D); and
0
p. Adding paragraph (h)(8).
    The revisions and additions read as follows:

Sec.  141.153  Content of the reports.

    (a) Each community water system must provide to its customers a
report(s) that contains the information specified in this section,
Sec.  141.154, and include a summary as specified in Sec.  141.156.
    (b) * * *
    (2) If a source water assessment has been completed, the report
must notify consumers of the availability of this information, the year
it was completed or most recently updated, and the means to obtain it.
In addition, systems are encouraged to highlight in the report
significant sources of contamination in the source water area if they
have readily available information. Where a system has received a
source water assessment from the primacy agency, the report must
include a brief summary of the system's susceptibility to potential
sources of contamination, using language provided by the primacy agency
or written by the operator.
    (c) * * *
    (1)
    (iii) Contaminant: Any physical, chemical, biological, or
radiological substance or matter in water.
* * * * *
    (3) * * *
    (v) Corrosion control efforts: Treatment (including pH adjustment,
alkalinity adjustment, or corrosion inhibitor addition) or other
efforts contributing to the control of the corrosivity of water, e.g.,
monitoring to assess the corrosivity of water.
    (4) A report that contains information regarding a Level 1 or Level
2 Assessment required under Subpart Y--Revised Total Coliform Rule of
this part must include the applicable definitions:
* * * * *
    (5) Systems must use the following definitions for the terms listed
below if the terms are used in the report unless the system obtains
written approval from the state to use an alternate definition:
    (i) Parts per million (ppm): Parts per million (ppm) is a
measurement of the quantity of a substance in the water. A
concentration of one ppm means that there is one part of that substance
for every one million parts of water.
    (ii) Parts per billion (ppb): Parts per billion (ppb) is a
measurement of the quantity of a substance in the water. A
concentration of one ppb means that there is one part of that substance
for every one billion parts of water.
    (iii) Parts per trillion (ppt): Parts per trillion (ppt) is a
measurement of the quantity of a substance in the water. A
concentration of one ppt means that there is one part of that substance
for every one trillion parts of water.
    (iv) Pesticide: Generally, any substance or mixture of substances
intended for preventing, destroying, repelling, or mitigating any pest.
    (v) Herbicide: Any chemical(s) used to control undesirable
vegetation.
    (d) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) Contaminants subject to a MCL, action level, maximum residual
disinfectant level, or treatment technique (regulated contaminants);
and
    (ii) Contaminants for which monitoring is required by Sec.  141.40
(unregulated contaminants).
    (2) The data relating to these contaminants must be presented in
the reports in a manner that is clear and understandable for consumers.
For example, the data may be displayed in one table or in several
adjacent tables. Any additional monitoring results which a community
water system chooses to include in its report must be displayed
separately.
    (3) The data must be derived from data collected to comply with EPA
and State monitoring and analytical requirements during the previous
calendar year, or the most recent calendar year before the previous
calendar year except that:
    (i) Where a system is allowed to monitor for regulated contaminants
less often than once a year, the contaminant data section must include
the date and results of the most recent sampling and the report must
include a brief statement indicating that the data presented in the
report are from the

most recent testing done in accordance with the regulations. No data
older than 5 years need be included.
* * * * *
    (4) For each detected regulated contaminant (listed in appendix A
to this subpart), the contaminant data section(s) must contain:
* * * * *
    (iii) If there is no MCL for a detected contaminant, the
contaminant data section(s) must indicate that there is a treatment
technique, or specify the action level, applicable to that contaminant,
and the report must include the definitions for treatment technique
and/or action level, as appropriate, specified in paragraph (c)(3) of
this section;
    (iv) For contaminants subject to an MCL, except turbidity and E.
coli, the contaminant data section(s) must contain the highest
contaminant level used to determine compliance with an NPDWR and the
range of detected levels, as follows:
* * * * *
    (B) When compliance with the MCL is determined by calculating a
running annual average of all samples taken at a monitoring location:
the highest average of any of the monitoring locations and the range of
individual sample results for all monitoring locations expressed in the
same units as the MCL. For the MCLs for TTHM and HAA5 in Sec.
141.64(b)(2), systems must include the highest locational running
annual average for TTHM and HAA5 and the range of individual sample
results for all monitoring locations expressed in the same units as the
MCL. If more than one location exceeds the TTHM or HAA5 MCL, the system
must include the locational running annual averages for all locations
that exceed the MCL.
* * * * *
    (vii) [Reserved]
    (viii) [Reserved]
    (ix) The likely source(s) of detected contaminants to the best of
the operator's knowledge. Specific information regarding contaminants
may be available in sanitary surveys and source water assessments and
should be used when available to the operator. If the operator lacks
specific information on the likely source, the report must include one
or more of the typical sources for that contaminant listed in appendix
A to this subpart that is most applicable to the system; and
    (x) For E. coli analytical results under subpart Y-Revised Total
Coliform Rule: The total number of E. coli positive samples.
    (5) If a community water system distributes water to its customers
from multiple hydraulically independent distribution systems that are
fed by different raw water sources, the contaminant data section(s)
should differentiate contaminant data for each service area and the
report should identify each separate distribution system. For example,
if displayed in a table, it should contain a separate column for each
service area. Alternatively, systems could produce separate reports
tailored to include data for each service area.
    (6) The detected contaminant data section(s) must clearly identify
any data indicating violations of MCLs, MRDLs, or treatment techniques,
and the report must contain a clear and readily understandable
explanation of the violation including: the length of the violation,
the potential adverse health effects, and actions taken by the system
to address the violation. To describe the potential health effects, the
system must use the relevant language of appendix A to this subpart.
    (7) For detected unregulated contaminants for which monitoring is
required, the reports must present the average and range at which the
contaminant was detected. The report must include a brief explanation
of the reasons for monitoring for unregulated contaminants such as:
    (i) Unregulated contaminant monitoring helps EPA to determine where
certain contaminants occur and whether the Agency should consider
regulating those contaminants in the future.
    (ii) A system may write its own educational statement with approval
by the Primacy Agency.
    (8) For systems that exceeded the lead action level in Sec.
141.80(c) (or a prescribed level of lead that the Administrator
establishes for public education or notification in a successor
regulation), the detected contaminant data section must clearly
identify the exceedance if any corrective action has been required by
the Administrator or the State during the monitoring period covered by
the report. The report must include a clear and readily understandable
explanation of the exceedance, the steps consumers can take to reduce
their exposure to lead, and a description of any corrective actions the
system has or will take to address the exceedance.
    (e) * * *
    (1) If the system has performed any monitoring for Cryptosporidium
which indicates that Cryptosporidium may be present in the source water
or the finished water, the report must include:
* * * * *
    (f) Compliance with NPDWR. In addition to the requirements of Sec.
141.153(d)(6), the report must note any violation that occurred during
the period covered by the report of a requirement listed below, and
include a clear and readily understandable explanation of the
violation, any potential adverse health effects, and the steps the
system has taken to correct the violation.
* * * * *
    (2) Filtration and disinfection prescribed by subpart H-Filtration
and Disinfection of this part. For systems which have failed to install
adequate filtration or disinfection equipment or processes, or have had
a failure of such equipment or processes which constitutes a violation,
the report must include the following language as part of the
explanation of potential adverse health effects: Inadequately treated
water may contain disease-causing organisms. These organisms include
bacteria, viruses, and parasites which can cause symptoms such as
nausea, cramps, diarrhea, and associated headaches.
    (3) Lead and copper control requirements prescribed by subpart I-
Control of Lead and Copper of this part. For systems that fail to take
one or more actions prescribed by Sec. Sec.  141.80(d), 141.81, 141.82,
141.83, 141.84, or 141.93, the report must include the applicable
language of appendix A to this subpart for lead, copper, or both.
* * * * *
    (h) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) Both tap water and bottled water come from rivers, lakes,
streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over
the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally
occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material. The water
can also pick up and transport substances resulting from the presence
of animals or from human activity. These substances are also called
contaminants.
    (ii) Contaminants are any physical, chemical, biological, or
radiological substance or matter in water. Contaminants that may be
present in source water include:
* * * * *
    (B) Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, which can
occur naturally in the soil or groundwater or may result from urban
stormwater runoff, industrial or domestic

wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or farming.
* * * * *
    (E) Radioactive contaminants, which can occur naturally or be the
result of oil and gas production and mining activities.
    (iii) To protect public health, the Environmental Protection Agency
prescribes regulations which limit the amount of certain contaminants
in tap water provided by public water systems. The Food and Drug
Administration regulations establish limits for contaminants in bottled
water which must provide the same protection for public health.
    (iv) Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be
expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The
presence of contaminants does not necessarily mean that water poses a
health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health
effects can be obtained by calling the Environmental Protection
Agency's Safe Drinking Water Hotline<PHONE_NUMBER>).
    (2) The report must include the telephone number of the owner,
operator, or designee of the community water system as a source of
additional information concerning the report. If a system uses a
website or social media to share additional information, EPA recommends
including information about how to access such media platforms in the
report.
    (3) In communities with a large proportion of consumers with
limited English proficiency, as determined by the Primacy Agency, the
report must contain information in the appropriate language(s)
regarding the importance of the report and contain a telephone number,
address, or contact information where such consumers may obtain a
translated copy of the report, or assistance in the appropriate
language, or the report must be in the appropriate language.
    (i) Systems that are a recipient of EPA assistance, as defined in
40 CFR 7.25, must provide meaningful access to information in the
reports to persons served by the water system with limited English
proficiency.
    (ii) Systems unable to provide translation support must include
contact information to obtain translation assistance from the State. As
described in Sec.  142.16(f), States are required, as a condition of
primacy to provide water systems with contact information where
consumers can obtain translation assistance from the State.
* * * * *
    (6) Systems required to comply with subpart S-Ground Water Rule.
    (i) Any ground water system that receives notice from the State of
a significant deficiency or notice from a laboratory of a fecal
indicator-positive ground water source sample that is not invalidated
by the State under Sec.  141.402(d) must inform its customers of any
significant deficiency that is uncorrected at the time of the next
reporting period or of any fecal indicator-positive ground water source
sample in the next report or 6-month update according to Sec.  141.155.
The system must continue to inform the public annually until the State
determines that particular significant deficiency is corrected or the
fecal contamination in the ground water source is addressed under Sec.
141.403(a). Each report must include the following elements:
* * * * *
    (7) Systems required to comply with subpart Y-Revised Total
Coliform Rule.
    (i) Any system required to comply with the Level 1 assessment
requirement or a Level 2 assessment requirement that is not due to an
E. coli MCL violation must include in the report the text found in
paragraph (h)(7)(i)(A) and paragraphs (h)(7)(i)(B) and (C) of this
section as appropriate, filling in the blanks accordingly and the text
found in paragraphs (h)(7)(i)(D)(1) and (2) of this section if
appropriate. Systems may write their own assessment statement with
equivalent information for paragraphs (h)(7)(i)(B) and (C) of this
section, with approval by the Primacy Agency.
    (A) Coliforms are bacteria that occur naturally in the environment
and are used as an indicator that other, potentially harmful,
waterborne organisms may be present or that a potential pathway exists
through which contamination may enter the drinking water distribution
system. We found coliforms indicating the need to look for potential
problems in water treatment or distribution. When this occurs, we are
required to conduct assessment(s) to identify problems and to correct
any problems that were found during these assessments.
    (B) Because we found coliforms during sampling, we were required to
conduct [INSERT NUMBER OF LEVEL 1ASSESSMENTS] assessment(s) of the
system, also known as a Level 1 assessment, to identify possible
sources of contamination. [INSERT NUMBER OF LEVEL 1 ASSESSMENTS] Level
1 assessment(s) were completed. In addition, we were required to take
[INSERT NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] corrective actions and we
completed [INSERT NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] of these actions.
    (C) Because we found coliforms during sampling, we were required to
conduct [INSERT NUMBER OF LEVEL 2 ASSESSMENTS] detailed assessments,
also known as a Level 2 assessment, to identify possible sources of
contamination. [INSERT NUMBER OF LEVEL 2 ASSESSMENTS] Level 2
assessments were completed. In addition, we were required to take
[INSERT NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] corrective actions and we
completed [INSERT NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] of these actions.
    (D) * * *
    (1) During the past year we failed to conduct all the required
assessment(s).
* * * * *
    (ii) Any system required to conduct a Level 2 assessment due to an
E. coli MCL violation must include in the report the text found in
paragraphs (h)(7)(ii)(A) and (B) of this section, and health effects
language in appendix A of this section, filling in the blanks
accordingly and the text found in paragraphs (h)(7)(ii)(C)(1) and (2)
of this section, if appropriate. Systems may write their own assessment
statement with equivalent information for paragraphs (h)(7)(ii)(A), (B)
and (C) of this section, with approval by the Primacy Agency.
    (A) We found E. coli bacteria, indicating the need to look for
potential problems in water treatment or distribution. When this
occurs, we are required to conduct assessment(s), also known as a Level
1 assessment, to identify problems and to correct any problems that
were found during these assessments.
    (B) We were required to complete a detailed assessment of our water
system, also known as a Level 2 assessment, because we found E. coli in
our water system. In addition, we were required to take [INSERT NUMBER
OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] corrective actions and we completed [INSERT
NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] of these actions.
    (C) * * *
* * * * *
    (2) We failed to correct all defects that were identified during
the assessment that we conducted.
    (iii) * * *
    (D) We failed to test for E. coli when any repeat sample tested
positive for total coliform.
* * * * *
    (8) Systems required to comply with subpart I-Control of Lead and
Copper.
    (i) The report must notify consumers that complete lead tap
sampling data are

available for review and must include information on how to access the
data.
    (ii) The report must include a statement that a service line
inventory (including inventories consisting only of a statement that
there are no lead service lines) has been prepared and include
instructions to access the publicly available service line inventory.
If the service line inventory is available online, the report must
include the direct link to the inventory.
    (iii) The report must contain a brief and plainly worded
explanation of the corrosion control efforts the system is taking in
accordance with 40 CFR part 141, subpart I Control of Lead and Copper.
0
5. Amend Sec.  141.154 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a), (b), (c)(1) and (2), and (d)(2); and
0
b. Removing paragraphs (e) and (f).
    The revisions read as follows:

Sec.  141.154  Required additional health information.

    (a) All reports must prominently display the following language:
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water
than the general population. Immuno-compromised persons such as persons
with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ
transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders,
some elderly, and infants can be particularly at risk from infections.
These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health
care providers. EPA/CDC guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the
risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and other microbial contaminants
are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline<PHONE_NUMBER>) or on
EPA's website epa.gov/safewater.
    (b) A system that detects arsenic above 0.005 mg/L and up to and
including 0.010 mg/L:
    (1) Must include in its report a short informational statement
about arsenic, using language such as: Arsenic is known to cause cancer
in humans. Arsenic also may cause other health effects such as skin
damage and circulatory problems. [NAME OF UTILITY] meets the EPA
arsenic drinking water standard, also known as a Maximum Contaminant
Level (MCL). However, you should know that EPA's MCL for arsenic
balances the scientific community's understanding of arsenic-related
health effects and the cost of removing arsenic from drinking water.
The highest concentration of arsenic found in [YEAR] was [INSERT MAX
ARSENIC LEVEL per Sec.  141.153(d)(4)(iv)] ppb, which is less than the
EPA's MCL of 10 ppb.
    (2) May write its own educational statement, with approval by the
Primacy Agency.
    (c) * * *
    (1) Must include a short informational statement about the impacts
of nitrate on children using language such as: Even though [NAME OF
UTILITY] meets the EPA nitrate drinking water standard, also known as a
Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL), if you are caring for an infant and
using tap water to prepare formula, you may want to use alternate
sources of water or ask for advice from your health care provider.
Nitrate levels above 10 ppm pose a particularly high health concern for
infants under 6 months of age and can interfere with the capacity of
the infant's blood to carry oxygen, resulting in a serious illness.
Symptoms of serious illness include shortness of breath and blueness of
the skin, known as ``blue baby syndrome.'' Nitrate levels in drinking
water can increase for short periods of time due to high levels of
rainfall or agricultural activity, therefore we test for nitrate
[INSERT APPLICABLE SAMPLING FREQUENCY]. The highest level for nitrate
found during [YEAR] was [INSERT MAX NITRATE LEVEL per Sec.
141.153(d)(4)(iv)] ppm, which is less than the EPA's MCL of 10 ppm.
    (2) May write its own educational statement, with approval by the
Primacy Agency.
    (d)* * *
    (2) A system may write its own educational statement, with approval
by the State.
0
6. Amend Sec.  141.155 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading and paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (e), (g)
introductory text, (g)(1)(i), (g)(2); and
0
b. Adding paragraphs (i) and (j).
    The revisions and additions read as follows:

Sec.  141.155   Report delivery, reporting and recordkeeping.

    (a) Except as provided in paragraph (g) of this section, each
community water system must directly deliver a copy of the report to
each customer.
    (1) Systems must use at a minimum, one of the following forms of
delivery:
    (i) Mail a paper copy of the report;
    (ii) Mail a notification that the report is available on a website
via a direct link; or
    (iii) Email a direct link or electronic version of the report.
    (2) Systems using delivery methods in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) and
(iii) of this section must provide a paper copy of the report to any
customer upon request. The notification method must prominently display
directions for requesting such copy.
    (3) For systems that choose to electronically deliver the reports
by posting the report to a website and providing a notification either
by mail or email, the report must be publicly available on the website
at time notification is made. Notifications must prominently display
the link and include an explanation of the nature of the link.
    (i) Systems may use a web page to convey the information required
in Sec. Sec.  141.153, 141.154, and 141.156.
    (4) Systems that use a publicly available website to provide
reports must maintain public access to the report for no less than 3
years.
    (b) The system must make a good faith effort to reach consumers who
do not get water bills, using means recommended by the primacy agency.
EPA expects that an adequate good faith effort will be tailored to the
consumers who are served by the system but are not bill-paying
customers, such as renters or workers. A good faith effort to reach
consumers includes a mix of methods to reach the broadest possible
range of persons served by the water system such as, but not limited
to: Posting the reports on the internet; mailing reports or postcards
with links to the reports to all service addresses and/or postal
customers; using an opt in notification system to send emails and/or
texts with links to the reports to interested consumers; advertising
the availability of the report in the news media and on social media;
publication in a local newspaper; posting a copy of the report or
notice of availability with links (or equivalent, such as QR codes) in
public places such as cafeterias or lunch rooms of public buildings;
delivery of multiple copies for distribution by single-biller customers
such as apartment buildings or large private employers; delivery to
community organizations; and holding a public meeting to educate
consumers on the reports.
    (c) No later than the date the system is required to distribute the
report to its customers, each community water system must provide a
copy of the report to the primacy agency, followed within 3 months by a
certification that the report(s) has/have been distributed to
customers, and that the information is correct and consistent with the
compliance monitoring data previously submitted to the primacy agency.
* * * * *
    (e) Each community water system must make its reports available to
the public upon request. Systems must make a reasonable effort to
provide the reports in an accessible format to

anyone who requests an accommodation.
* * * * *
    (g) The Governor of a State or their designee, or the Tribal Leader
where the tribe has met the eligibility requirements contained in Sec.
142.72 for the purposes of waiving the mailing requirement, can waive
the requirement of paragraph (a) of this section for community water
systems serving fewer than 10,000 persons. In consultation with the
tribal government, the Regional Administrator may waive the requirement
of Sec.  141.155(a) in areas in Indian country where no tribe has been
deemed eligible.
    (1) * * *
    (i) Publish the reports in one or more local newspapers or on one
or more local online news sites serving the area in which the system is
located;
* * * * *
    (2) Systems serving 500 or fewer persons may forego the
requirements of paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section if they
provide notice that the report is available upon request at least once
per year to their customers by mail, door-to-door delivery or by
posting in one or more locations where persons served by the system can
reasonably be expected to see it.
* * * * *
    (i) Systems serving 100,000 or more persons, must develop a plan
for providing meaningful access to reports for limited English-
proficient consumers. The system must evaluate the languages spoken by
limited English-proficient persons served by the water system, and the
system's anticipated approach to address translation needs. The first
plan must be provided to the state with the first report in 2025. Plans
must be evaluated annually and updated as necessary and reported with
the certification required in Sec.  141.155(c).
    (j) Delivery timing and biannual delivery.
    (1) Each community water system must distribute reports by July 1
each year. Each report distributed by July 1 must use data collected
during, or prior to, the previous calendar year using methods described
in paragraph (a) of this section.
    (2) Each community water system serving 10,000 or more persons must
distribute the report biannually, or twice per calendar year, by
December 31 using methods described in paragraph (a) of this section.
    (3) Systems required to comply with paragraph (j)(2) of this
section, with a violation or action level exceedance that occurred
between January 1st and June 30th of the current year, or have received
monitoring results from required monitoring under Sec.  141.40
Unregulated Contaminants Monitoring Rule, must include a 6-month update
with the second report with the following:
    (i) A short description of the nature of the 6-month update and the
biannual delivery.
    (ii) If a system receives an MCL, MRDL, or treatment technique
violation, the 6-month update must include the applicable contaminant
section information in Sec.  141.153(d)(4), and a readily
understandable explanation of the violation including: the length of
the violation, the potential adverse health effects, actions taken by
the system to address the violation, and timeframe the system expects
to complete those actions. To describe the potential health effects,
the system must use the relevant language of appendix A to this
subpart.
    (iii) If a system receives any other violation, the 6-month update
must include the information in Sec.  141.153(f).
    (iv) If a system exceeded the lead action level following
monitoring conducted between January 1st and June 30th of the current
year, the system must include information identified in Sec.
141.153(d)(4)(vi) and 141.153(d)(8).
    (v) For systems monitoring under Sec.  141.40 that become aware of
results for samples collected during the reporting year but were not
included in the reports distributed by July 1, the system must include
information as required by Sec.  141.153(d)(7).
0
7. Adding Sec.  141.156 to read as follows:

Sec.  141.156   Summary of report contents

    (a) Each report must include a summary displayed prominently at the
beginning of the report.
    (b) Systems must include, at a minimum, the following information
in the summary:
    (1) Summary of violations and compliance information included in
the report required by Sec. Sec.  141.153(d)(6), 141.153(d)(8),
141.153(f),141.153(h)(6), and 141.153(h)(7).
    (2) Contact information for owner, operator, or designee of the
community water system as a source of additional information concerning
the report, per Sec.  141.153(h)(2).
    (c) If applicable, systems must include the following in the
summary:
    (1) For systems using delivery methods in Sec.  141.155(a)(1)(ii)
or (iii), the summary must include directions for consumers to request
a paper copy of the report, as described in Sec.  141.155(a)(2).
    (2) Translation contact information to receive assistance with
translating information in the report, per Sec.  141.153(h)(3).
    (3) For systems using the report to also meet the public
notification requirements of subpart Q--Public Notification of Drinking
Water Violations, the summary must specify that it is also serving to
provide public notification of one or more violations or situations,
provide a brief statement about the nature of the notice(s), and a
brief description of how to locate the notice(s) in the report.
    (d) The summary should be written in plain language and may use
infographics.
    (e) For those systems required to include a 6-month update with the
second report under Sec.  141.155(j)(2), the summary should include a
brief description of the nature of the report and update, noting the
availability of new information for the current year (between January
and June).
    (f) The report summary must include the following standard language
to encourage the distribution of the report to all persons served:
    Please share this information with anyone who drinks this water (or
their guardians), especially those who may not have received this
report directly (for example, people in apartments, nursing homes,
schools, and businesses). You can do this by posting this report in a
public place or distributing copies by hand, mail, email, or another
method.

PART 142--NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS
IMPLEMENTATION

0
8. The authority citation for part 142 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 300f, 300g-1, 300g-2, 300g-3, 300g-4, 300g-
5, 300g-6, 300j-4, 300j-9, and 300j-11.

0
9. Amend Sec.  142.14 by adding paragraph (h) to read as follows:

Sec.  142.14   Records kept by States.

* * * * *
    (h) Each State that has primary enforcement responsibility must
maintain the following records under subpart O of this part:
    (1) A copy of the consumer confidence reports for a period of one
year and the certifications obtained pursuant to 40 CFR 141.155(c) for
a period of 5 years.
    (2) A copy of the plans submitted pursuant to 40 CFR
141.153(h)(3)(i) for a period of 5 years.
0
10. Amend Sec.  142.15 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b) introductory text;

0
b. Removing in paragraph (b)(2), the period at the end of the paragraph
and adding ``; and'' in its place; and
0
c. Adding paragraph (b)(3).
    The revisions and additions read as follows:

Sec.  142.15   Reports by States.

* * * * *
    (b) Each State which has primary enforcement responsibility must
submit annual reports to the Administrator on a schedule and in a
format prescribed by the Administrator, consisting of the following
information:
* * * * *
    (3) Compliance monitoring data and related data necessary for
determining compliance for all existing National Primary Drinking Water
Regulations (NPDWRs) in 40 CFR part 141. Related compliance data
include specified records kept by the State in Sec.  142.14.
* * * * *
0
11. Amend Sec.  142.16 by revising paragraphs (f)(1), (3), and (4) to
read as follows:

Sec.  142.16  Special primacy requirements.

* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (1) Each State that has primary enforcement responsibility must
adopt the revised requirements of 40 CFR part 141, subpart O no later
than [DATE TWO YEARS AFTER DATE OF FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
States must submit revised programs to EPA for approval using the
procedures in Sec.  142.12(b) through (d).
* * * * *
    (3) Each State must, as a condition of primacy, provide water
systems with translation assistance to consumers upon request and
provide contact information where consumers can obtain translation
assistance for inclusion in the system's report.
    (4) Each application for approval of a revised program must
include:
    (i) A description of how the State will meet the requirements in
Sec.  141.153(h)(6) to provide translation assistance to consumers and
contact information for translation assistance to water systems; and
    (ii) A description of procedures for waiving the mailing
requirement for small systems consistent with 40 CFR 141.155(g).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2023-06674 Filed 4-4-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 5, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25630-25633]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10316]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2015-1266; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-151-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-
200B, 747-300, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by an evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH)
indicating that certain fuselage skin lap joints are subject to
widespread fatigue damage (WFD). This proposed AD would require
repetitive post-modification inspections for cracking of the skin or
internal doubler along the edge fastener rows of the modification, and
repair if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct
fatigue cracking in certain fuselage skin lap joints, which could
result in rapid depressurization of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 19, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.
O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It
is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA 2015-1266.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
1266; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathan Weigand, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6428; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-1266;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-151-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    Structural fatigue damage is progressive. It begins as minute
cracks, and those cracks grow under the action of repeated stresses.
This can happen because of normal operational conditions and design
attributes, or because of isolated situations or incidents such as
material defects, poor fabrication quality, or corrosion pits, dings,
or scratches. Fatigue damage can occur locally, in small areas or
structural design details, or globally. Global fatigue damage is
general degradation of large areas of structure with similar structural
details and stress levels. Multiple-site damage is global damage that
occurs in a large structural element such as a single rivet line of a
lap splice joining two large skin panels. Global damage can also occur
in multiple elements such as adjacent frames or stringers. Multiple-
site-damage and multiple-element-damage cracks are typically too small
initially to be reliably detected with normal inspection methods.
Without intervention, these cracks will grow, and eventually compromise
the structural integrity of the airplane, in a condition known as WFD.
As an airplane ages, WFD will likely occur, and will certainly occur if
the airplane is operated long enough without any intervention.
    The FAA's WFD final rule (75 FR 69746, November 15, 2010) became
effective on January 14, 2011. The WFD rule requires certain actions to
prevent structural failure due to WFD throughout the operational life
of certain existing transport category airplanes and all of these
airplanes that will be certificated in the future. For existing and
future airplanes subject to the WFD rule, the rule requires that DAHs
establish a limit of validity (LOV) of the engineering data that
support the structural maintenance program. Operators affected by the
WFD rule may not fly an airplane beyond its LOV, unless an extended LOV
is approved.
    The WFD rule (75 FR 69746, November 15, 2010) does not require
identifying and developing maintenance actions if the DAHs can show
that such actions are not necessary to prevent WFD before the airplane
reaches the LOV. Many LOVs, however, do depend on accomplishment of
future maintenance actions. As stated in the WFD rule, any maintenance
actions necessary to reach the LOV will be mandated by airworthiness
directives through separate rulemaking actions.
    In the context of WFD, this action is necessary to enable DAHs to
propose LOVs that allow operators the longest operational lives for
their airplanes, and still ensure that WFD will not occur. This
approach allows for an implementation strategy that provides
flexibility to DAHs in determining the timing of service information
development (with FAA approval), while providing operators with
certainty regarding the LOV applicable to their airplanes.
    This proposed AD was prompted by an evaluation by the DAH
indicating

that certain fuselage skin lap joints are subject to WFD. We are
proposing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking in certain
fuselage skin lap joints, which could result in rapid depressurization
of the airplane.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5,
dated July 8, 2014. This service information describes procedures for
inspections for cracks in the skin and doublers along the edge fastener
rows of modifications in the fuselage, and repairs. Refer to this
service information for information on the procedures and compliance
times. This service information is reasonably available at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
1266. Or see ADDRESSES for other ways to access this service
information.

Related Rulemaking

    AD 2010-10-05, Amendment 39-16284 (75 FR 27424, May 17, 2010)
requires, among other things, modification of certain lap joints in
fuselage sections 41 and 42. This proposed AD would require repetitive
post-modification inspections for cracking of the skin or internal
doubler along the edge fastener rows of the modification, and repair if
necessary.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type
designs.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously, except as discussed
under ``Difference Between this Proposed AD and the Service
Information.''

Difference Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information

    Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July
8, 2014, specifies to contact the manufacturer for instructions on how
to repair cracking, but this proposed AD would require repairing those
conditions in one of the following ways:
     In accordance with a method that we approve; or
     Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) whom we have
authorized to make those findings.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 50 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                        Labor cost         Parts cost       Cost per product                   Cost on U.S. operators
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post[dash]modification inspection...  124 work-hours x $85              $0   $10,540 per inspection   $527,000 per inspection cycle.
                                       per hour = $10,540 per                 cycle.
                                       inspection cycle..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.
    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2014-1266; Directorate Identifier
2014-NM-151-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by June 19, 2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B,
747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-300, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8, 2014.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval
holder (DAH) indicating that certain fuselage skin lap joints are
subject to widespread fatigue damage (WFD). We are issuing this AD
to detect and correct fatigue cracking in certain fuselage skin lap
joints, which could result in rapid depressurization of the
airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Repetitive Post-Modification Inspections for Airplane Groups 1
Through 3, 7, and 8

    For airplanes identified as Groups 1 through 3, 7, and 8 in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8,
2014: Except as provided by paragraph (m) of this AD, at the
applicable time specified in table 3 of paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367,
Revision 5, dated July 8, 2014, do internal detailed and surface
high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections for cracks in the
skin and internal doubler along the edge fastener rows of the
modification; in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8,
2014. In unrepaired areas, repeat the internal detailed and surface
HFEC inspections for cracks in the skin or internal doubler along
the edge fastener rows of the modification thereafter at the
applicable intervals specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8,
2014.

(h) Initial Post-Modification Inspections for Airplane Groups 4 Through
6, and 9 Through 11

    For airplanes identified as Groups 4 through 6, and 9 through 11
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July
8, 2014, with external doublers installed as specified in Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-53-2272: Except as provided by paragraph (m) of
this AD, at the applicable time specified in table 4 of paragraph
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367,
Revision 5, dated July 8, 2014, do external detailed, low frequency
eddy current (LFEC), and HFEC inspections for cracks in the skin and
external doubler, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July
8, 2014.

(i) Repetitive Post-Modification Inspections for Airplane Groups 4
Through 6, and 9 through 11

    For airplanes with no crack findings during the inspections
required by paragraph (h) of this AD: Do the applicable actions
required by paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD.
    (1) For airplanes with less than 15,000 flight cycles since
stringer 6 external doublers were installed as specified in Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-53-2272: At the applicable intervals specified
in table 4 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8, 2014, in
unrepaired areas, repeat the external detailed and LFEC inspections
for cracks in the skin, and the external detailed and HFEC
inspections for cracks in the external doubler, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8, 2014.
    (2) For airplanes with 15,000 or more flight cycles since the
stringer 6 external doublers were installed as specified in Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-53-2272: At the applicable intervals specified
in table 4 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8, 2014, in
unrepaired areas, do external detailed and LFEC inspections for
cracks in the skin; and do internal and external detailed and HFEC
inspections for cracks in the skin and external doubler; in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8, 2014.

(j) Repetitive Post-Modification Inspections for Airplane Groups 4
Through 6, and 9 Through 11 With External Doublers

    For airplanes identified as Groups 4 through 6, and 9 through 11
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July
8, 2014, with external doublers installed as specified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367: Except as provided by paragraph
(m) of this AD, at the applicable time specified in table 5 of
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8, 2014, do internal detailed
and surface HFEC inspections for cracks in the skin and internal
doubler along the edge fastener rows of the modification; and do
internal detailed and surface HFEC inspections for cracks in the
skin or internal doubler along the edge fastener rows of the
modification; in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8,
2014. In unrepaired areas, repeat the internal detailed and surface
HFEC inspections for cracks in the skin or internal doubler along
the edge fastener rows of the modification thereafter at the
applicable interval specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8,
2014.

(k) Repetitive Post-Modification Inspections for Airplane Groups 12 and
13

    For airplanes identified as Groups 12 and 13 in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8, 2014: Except
as provided by paragraph (m) of this AD, at the applicable time
specified in table 6 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8, 2014,
do internal detailed and surface HFEC inspections for cracks in the
skin and internal doubler along the edge fastener rows of the
modification, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8,
2014. In unrepaired areas, repeat the internal detailed and surface
HFEC inspections for cracks in the skin or internal doubler along
the edge fastener rows of the modification thereafter at the
applicable interval specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8,
2014.

(l) Corrective Actions

    If any cracking is found during any inspection required by this
AD: Before further flight, repair the cracking using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph
(n) of this AD.

(m) Exception to Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5,
Dated July 8, 2014

    Where paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2367, Revision 5, dated July 8, 2014, specifies a
compliance time ``after the Revision 5 date of this service
bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the specified
compliance time ``after the effective date of this AD.''

(n) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (o)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA)
that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those
findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

(o) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Nathan Weigand,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the
    FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 28, 2015.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-10316 Filed 5-4-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 56 (Friday, March 22, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10825-10826]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05511]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2014-0025; FRL-9989-42-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Asbestos (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for Asbestos, Subpart M)
(Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No. 0111.15, OMB Control No. 2060-0101), to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a proposed
extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through March 31,
2019. Public comments were previously requested, via the Federal
Register (82 FR 29552) on June 29, 2017 during a 60-day comment period,
and through a second announcement published (83 FR 48612) on September
26, 2018 to account for changes in reporting and recordkeeping
resulting from a recent action on an alternative work practice, and a
planned change to allow electronic reporting for notifications. This
notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller
description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden
and cost to the public. An Agency may neither conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before April 22,
2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2014-0025, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(202) 564-0050; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit: www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: For the Asbestos NESHAP ICR, owners and operators of
affected facilities are required to comply with reporting and
recordkeeping requirements for the General Provisions (40 CFR part 61,
subpart M), as well as for the applicable specific standards. This
includes submitting initial notifications, performance tests, and
periodic reports and results, maintaining records of the occurrence and
duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of
an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system
is inoperative. These reports are used by the EPA to determine
compliance with these standards.
    Form numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Demolition and renovation
facilities; disposal of asbestos wastes; asbestos milling,
manufacturing and fabricating; use of asbestos on roadways; asbestos
waste conversion facilities; and the use of asbestos insulation and
spray-on materials.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 61,
subpart M).
    Estimated number of respondents: 9,687 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, quarterly and
semiannually.
    Total estimated burden: 287,000 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $32,700,000 (per year), which includes $0 in
annualized capital/startup and/or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the estimates: There is a decrease in the total
estimated burden as currently identified in the OMB Inventory of
Approved Burdens. The change is due to the addition of electronic
reporting. The result is a reduction in burden by 5,050 hours per year.
We expect there to be an initial burden for respondents to learn the
new electronic reporting system, and a reduced burden over time to
submit notifications electronically (as compared to submitting them
through the U.S. mail, the currently required process). We expect the
regulated community and states in Region 3 to adopt electronic
submission of 40 CFR 61.145(b) notifications gradually, with other
Regions and their regulated community to follow. Therefore, although we
have conservatively estimated that approximately 10 percent of the
respondents use electronic reporting in this renewal, we expect the
number of respondents using electronic reporting to increase in the
coming years, which will result in additional burden reductions over
time.
    We have updated the respondent and Agency burdens to include an AWP
for ACPRPs. Burden associated with the CTPS AWP is due to the
collection and retention of samples and the requirement to report
malfunctions. Other changes, such as recordkeeping and notations to the
utility records (in the case of ACPRP using the AWP) or notation to the
deed are unchanged. Industry sources estimated ``there would eventually
be 100 (pipe replacement) companies that would use the close tolerance
horizontal directional drilling method over the years with the majority
of the (A/C pipe) footage being installed by 25 companies.''
    Finally, we have updated the number of respondents to accurately
reflect industry growth from the prior renewal, and updated the
respondent and Agency labor rates, which are referenced from the Bureau
of Labor Statistics and OPM, respectively. The overall result is a
decrease in burden; however, the revised labor rates and industry
growth

result in an increase in respondent labor costs.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2019-05511 Filed 3-21-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: November 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 216)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 68682-68684]
[DOCID:fr09no10-2]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0700; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-123-AD;
Amendment 39-16500; AD 2010-23-11]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10
(Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series
705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    The manufacturer has informed Transport Canada that a certain
number of the resolver stators, which were installed in the angle of
attack (AOA) transducers, were not cleaned correctly. This condition
can degrade the AOA transducer performance at low temperatures
resulting in freezing of the AOA transducer resolver, which may
provide inaccurate AOA data to the Stall Protection System (SPS). If
not corrected, this condition can result in early or late activation
of the stick shaker and/or stick pusher.

These conditions could result in reduced ability of the flight crew to
maintain a safe flight and landing of the airplane. We are issuing this
AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective December 14, 2010.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of December 14,
2010.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Licata, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on July 27, 2010 (75 FR
43882). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    The manufacturer has informed Transport Canada that a certain
number of the resolver stators, which were installed in the angle of
attack (AOA) transducers, were not cleaned correctly. This condition
can degrade the AOA transducer performance at low temperatures
resulting in freezing of the AOA transducer resolver, which may
provide inaccurate AOA data to the Stall Protection System (SPS). If
not corrected, this condition

can result in early or late activation of the stick shaker and/or
stick pusher.

These conditions could result in reduced ability of the flight crew to
maintain a safe flight and landing of the airplane. The required
actions include an inspection to determine if certain AOA transducers
are installed and replacement of affected transducers. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received. Air Line Pilots
Association, International (ALPA), supports the NPRM.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD as proposed.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 380 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $32,300, or $85 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2010-23-11 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16500. Docket No. FAA-
2010-0700; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-123-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective December
14, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10
(Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet
Series 705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes,
certificated in any category, equipped with Thales angle of attack
transducers having part number (P/N) C16258AA.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
Controls.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    The manufacturer has informed Transport Canada that a certain
number of the resolver stators, which were installed in the angle of
attack (AOA) transducers, were not cleaned correctly. This condition
can degrade the AOA transducer performance at low temperatures
resulting in freezing of the AOA transducer resolver, which may
provide inaccurate AOA data to the Stall Protection System (SPS). If
not corrected, this condition can result in early or late activation
of the stick shaker and/or stick pusher.
    These conditions could result in reduced ability of the flight
crew to maintain a safe flight and landing of the airplane.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Inspection

    (g) Within 750 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
inspect the serial number of each AOA transducer having P/N C16258AA
to determine if the serial number is identified in paragraph 1.A. of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-054, Revision A, dated
January 18, 2010, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-054, Revision A,
dated January 18, 2010. A review of airplane maintenance records is
acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the serial number of the
AOA transducer can be conclusively determined from that review.
    (1) If the serial number is not listed in paragraph 1.A. of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-054, Revision A, dated
January 18, 2010, no further action is

required by this AD other than compliance with paragraph (h) of this
AD.
    (2) If the serial number is listed in paragraph 1.A. of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-054, Revision A, dated
January 18, 2010, and has the suffix ``C'', no further action is
required by this AD other than compliance with paragraph (h) of this
AD.
    (3) If the serial number is listed paragraph 1.A. of Bombardier
Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-054, Revision A, dated January 18,
2010, and does not have the suffix ``C'', before further flight,
replace the AOA transducer with a new or serviceable transducer, in
accordance with Part C of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-054, Revision A, dated
January 18, 2010.

    Note 1: To replace any AOA transducer, the replacement AOA
transducer must either be outside of the affected serial numbers as
identified in paragraph 1.A. of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A670BA-27-054, Revision A, dated January 18, 2010, or have the
suffix ``C''.

    (h) As of the effective date of this AD, no AOA transducer
having both a serial number and P/N C16258AA as identified in
paragraph 1.A. of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-054,
Revision A, dated January 18, 2010, may be installed on any airplane
unless the AOA transducer has been inspected by the manufacturer and
identified with the suffix ``C''.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (i) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Program
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone 516-
228-7300; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal
maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (j) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2010-13,
dated May 6, 2010; and Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-
054, Revision A, dated January 18, 2010; for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (k) You must use Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-
054,
    Revision A, dated January 18, 2010, to do the actions required
by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://
www.bombardier.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 21, 2010.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-28089 Filed 11-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 6, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 87999]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29136]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC)
meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of the ARAC.

DATES: The meeting will be held on December 15, 2016, starting at 1:00
p.m. Eastern Standard Time. Arrange oral presentations by December 08,
2016.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, 10th
floor, MacCracken Conference Room.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nikeita Johnson, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591,
telephone (202) 267- 4977; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), we are giving notice of a
meeting of the ARAC taking place on December 15, 2016, at the Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20591.
    The Agenda includes:

1. Recommendation Report
    a. Rotorcraft Occupant Protection Working Group
2. Status Reports From Active Working Groups
    a. ARAC
    i. Air Traffic Controller Training Working Group
    ii. Aircraft Systems Information Security/Protection Working Group
    iii. Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working Group
    iv. Load Master Certification Working Group
    v. Airman Certification Systems Working Group
    b. Transport Airplane and Engine (TAE) Subcommittee
    i. Transport Airplane Metallic and Composite Structures Working
Group--Transport Airplane Damage-Tolerance and Fatigue Evaluation
    ii. Flight Test Harmonization Working Group--Phase 2 Tasking
    iii. Transport Airplane Crashworthiness and Ditching Evaluation
Working Group
    iv. Engine Harmonization Working Group--Engine Endurance Testing
Requirements--Revision of Section 33.87
    v. Airworthiness Assurance Working Group
3. Status Report from the FAA

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to the
space available. Please confirm your attendance with the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section no later than December
08, 2016. Please provide the following information: full legal name,
country of citizenship, and name of your industry association, or
applicable affiliation. If you are attending as a public citizen,
please indicate so.
    For persons participating by telephone, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by email or phone
for the teleconference call-in number and passcode. Callers are
responsible for paying long-distance charges.
    The public must arrange by December 08, 2016 to present oral
statements at the meeting. The public may present written statements to
the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee by providing 25 copies to
the Designated Federal Officer, or by bringing the copies to the
meeting.
    If you are in need of assistance or require a reasonable
accommodation for this meeting, please contact the person listed under
the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Sign and oral
interpretation, as well as a listening device, can be made available if
requested 10 calendar days before the meeting.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 28, 2016.
Lirio Liu,
Designated Federal Officer, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2016-29136 Filed 12-5-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P