UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

Issued by the Department of Transportation on July 25, 2003

   NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2003-15686

________________________________________________________________________
______________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Application of      United Parcel Service Co.   filed   7/8/03  for:

XX  Waiver from the 90-day dormancy condition:

By Order 2000-6-7, the Department awarded United Parcel Service Co.
(UPS) certificate authority and an allocation of four weekly frequencies
to operate services in the U.S.-Brazil market.  These frequencies were
subject to a dormancy condition that any frequencies not used for a
period of 90 days would revert automatically to the Department for
reallocation.  UPS requests a waiver from the 90-day dormancy condition
for ½ of one of its four frequencies through July 8, 2004.  UPS states
that it discontinued service with one weekly narrow-body aircraft due to
the recession in Brazil and the global economic downturn.  UPS’ ½
frequency would expire August 30, 2003, absent the waiver.

Applicant rep: David L. Vaughan<PHONE_NUMBER>  DOT analyst:  Sylvia
Moore<PHONE_NUMBER>

DISPOSITION

XX Granted (see Remarks below)

The above action was effective when taken:       July 25, 2003, through
 July 8, 2004

Action taken by:  Paul L. Gretch, Director

		 Office of International Aviation

________________________

Remarks:  We find that grant of UPS’ request, in the particular
circumstances presented, is in the public interest.  However, we are
putting UPS on notice that there should be no expectation that an
additional request will similarly be granted.  As is our policy in
considering dormancy waiver requests, we reserve the right to reexamine
whether grant of this waiver continues to be in the public interest.
Any future request to extend the dormancy waiver for the frequency at
issue here will have to be considered in light of the specific arguments
offered and responses thereto, and in the context of the circumstances
present at that time, including whether another carrier seeks to use the
frequency at issue.

(See Reverse Side)

2

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy, and (2) grant of the waiver was consistent with the public
interest.  To the extent not granted, we denied all requests in the
referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electric version of this document is available on the World Wide Web
at:

http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

 UPS’ waiver from the dormancy condition is effective through July 8,
2004, or until the date on which UPS resumes service with the ½
frequency, whichever occurs earlier.  If UPS does not begin service by
July 8, 2004, its allocation with respect to that ½ frequency will
expire automatically.


                     U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

	Washington, D.C. 20460

                                                                        OFFICE OF
	CHEMICAL SAFETY AND
	POLLUTION PREVENTION

                                                      Date:  July 19, 2011
                                                      PC Code:  128711
                                                      DP Barcode:  DP 384661
                                                      Decision:  441518

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:	Drinking Water Exposure for Quizalofop-P-Ethyl in Support of Propagation of Herbicide-tolerant Field Corn and Sorghum

TO:		Laura Nollen, Risk Manager Reviewer
		Barbara Madden, Risk Manager
		Registration Division (7505C)

FROM:	Stephen P. Wente, Biologist
            Environmental Risk Branch I
            Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7504P)

THRU:	Nancy Andrews, Branch Chief
            Sujatha Sankula, Lead Biologist
            Environmental Risk Branch I
            Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7504P)

I.	Exposure Summary

A Tier II drinking water assessment of surface water was performed to assess drinking water exposure for quizalofop-p-ethyl in support of propagation of herbicide-tolerant field corn and sorghum. (A rapeseed use that appears on the sorghum supplemental label was previously assessed under DP 310868 on 10/25/2005.) The PRZM/EXAMS simulations of several corn scenarios and a sorghum scenario produced the highest estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWC) of 6.5 ug/L for acute exposure, 2.0 ug/L for chronic exposure, and 1.3 ug/L for long-term cancer exposure from MS corn scenario (Table 4). These values are higher than the previously predicted EDWCs of 5.25 ug/L for acute exposure, 1.99 ug/L for chronic exposure, and 1.34 ug/L for long-term cancer exposure. Additionally, the Tier 1 drinking water predicted EDWC of 1.29 ug/L for both acute and chronic exposure is higher than the previous highest EDWC of 0.15 ug/L for ground water. Therefore, the previous EDWCs should be updated for surface drinking water and groundwater drinking water exposure assessment purposes.

II.	Proposed Use Information

The national-scale quizalofop-p-ethyl use information can be found from the web site of National Pesticide Synthesis Program (NPSP) of the U.S. Geological Survey at: http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/pnsp/usage/maps/show_map.php?year=02&map=m7006 (shown here as Figure 1.

Figure 1.  National-scale quizalofop-p-ethyl usage in 2002 as estimated by U.S. Geological Survey procedures.

This drinking water exposure assessment addresses use of quizalofop-p-ethyl on corn to produce herbicide-tolerant field corn seed as described on the proposed Assure(R) II label (EPA Reg. No. 352-541). This is a liquid herbicide applied as a foliar spray to control certain grassy weeds in field com containing DAS-40278-9 and selectively eliminates plants that do not carry a gene that imparts tolerance to quizalofop-p-ethyl herbicides used for propagation, breeding, and production. Assure(R) II may be applied to remove susceptible "segregates" (i.e., com plants that do not contain the quizalofop-p-ethyl tolerance trait) during seed propagation. According to the proposed label quizalofop-p-ethyl is applied at a rate 0.034 to 0.083 lbs a.i./A, not exceed two applications for total annual application rate of 0.083 lbs a.i./A.

III.	Water Resources Summary

No monitoring data was located during a search of the NAWQA data warehouse for quizalofop-p-ethyl or quizalofop-ethyl. Therefore, only model-generated EDWCs will be used in this drinking water assessment.

Surface Water Sources

The estimated drinking water concentrations from surface water sources were calculated using Tier II models PRZM (Pesticide Root Zone Model) and EXAMS (Exposure Analysis Modeling System). PRZM is used to simulate pesticide transport as the result of runoff and erosion from an agricultural field. EXAMS is used to estimate environmental fate and transport of pesticides in the receiving water bodies. A fraction of the application amount is added as spray drift loading to the receiving water bodies. The magnitude of the drift loading is dependent on the method of application. The current EFED approach is to use the linkage program  -  PE5V01, which incorporates the standard scenarios developed by EFED.

For drinking water purposes, the index reservoir is simulated. The index reservoir is based on a 172.8 ha watershed draining into a 5.3 ha reservoir with a depth of 2.74 m. A single steady flow is used to represent the flow through the reservoir. The index reservoir scenario uses the characteristics of a single soil to represent the soil in the watershed. Weather and agricultural practices are simulated over 30 years so that the 1-in10 year exceedence probability at the site can be estimated. The values generated by the models for drinking water were multiplied by a crop area factor (PCA), which accounts for the fact that it is unlikely for any basin to be completely planted to agricultural crops. Currently, EFED uses a default PCA of 0.87 for the combination of crops to which quizalofop-p-ethyl can be applied.

Ground Water Sources

The estimated drinking water concentrations from ground water sources were calculated using the Tier I SCIGROW (Screening Concentration In Ground Water) model. It is a regression approach model, based on the results of several prospective ground water monitoring studies. SCIGROW was developed using Koc values ranging from 32 - 180 ml/g and half-lives from 13 - 1000 days. Extrapolation beyond these values will increase the uncertainty of the predicted ground water concentrations.

For further information on these models see, http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/index.htm

The model inputs for PRZM/EXAMS and SCIGROW are presented below. These input selections are based on the Guidance for Selecting Input Parameters in Modeling the Environmental Fate and Transport of Pesticides, Version 2.1 (October 22, 2009).

Scenario Description

The model scenarios are only applicable to surface water models PRZM/EXAMS. (The ground water model, SCIGROW, is site independent.) Standard corn scenarios are available for Illinois Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. A single standard scenario, Kansas, is available for sorghum. The proposed label recommends applying quizalofop-p-ethyl on corn that is at the V2 through V6 stage of development, approximately 1 to 3 weeks after the emergence date. Sorghum applications can occur between emergence and 45 days before harvest. Therefore the quizalofop-p-ethyl application date was chosen to be 2 weeks after the scenario emergence date for corn and within the appropriate interval for sorghum. The specific modeling scenario information, such as Major Land Resource Region, meteorological file, soil, and crop emergence, application dates, is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.  Corn scenarios employed in this assessment.
                                   Scenario
                      Crop Region, Met File and Soil Info
                            Crop Development Event
                               Application Date
                                     Corn
Illinois
MLRA: 108, McLean Co., IL
Metfile: W14842, Soil: Adair Clay Loam
                             5/1 (emergence date)
                        5/15 (2 weeks after emergence)
Mississippi
MLRA: 134, Southern MS Valley Uplands
Metfile: W03940, Soil: Grenada Silt Loam
                             4/10 (emergence date)
                        4/24 (2 weeks after emergence)
North Carolina
MLRA: 153A, Pitt Co., NC
Metfile: W13722, Soil: Craven silt loam
                             4/15 (emergence date)
                        4/29 (2 weeks after emergence)
Ohio
MLRA: 111, Darke and Rickaway Co., OH
Metfile: W93815, Soil: Cardington Silt Loam
                             5/1 (emergence date)
                        5/15 (2 weeks after emergence)
Pennsylvania
MLRA: 148, Lancaster Co.
Metfile: W14751, Soil: Hagerstown Silt Loam
                             4/16 (emergence date)
                        4/30 (2 weeks after emergence)
                                    Sorghum
Kansas
MLRA: M106, Brown County, KS
Metfile: W13996, Soil: Wymore silty clay loam
                             10/20 (harvest date)
                    8/15 (at least 45 days before harvest)
MLRA: Major Land Resource Area; Metfile: the meteorological file used in the simulation.

Model Inputs

Based on the fact that quizalofop-p-ethyl degrades quickly with a half-life of 1 day in laboratory studies, the major aquatic exposure concern would be the quizalofop acid degradate. A total toxics residue (TTR) approach was used to estimate EDWCs based on both the parent and quizalofop acid degradate. No Residue of Concern Knowledge-Based Sub Committee (ROCKS) decision memo was located. Therefore, the choice of chemicals included in the TTR approach was based on the chemicals included in previous drinking water assessments (parent and quizalofop acid degradate only). Structures of the parent, degradate of concern, and other degradates identified in the fate studies appear in Appendix A. The following assumptions have been made in order to provide the exposure values for screening purposes:
      1.	Quizalofop-p-ethyl is completely and rapidly converted to quizalofop acid.
      2.	Quizalofop acid does not degrade by hydrolysis.
      3.	The solubility of quizalofop acid is assumed the same as the parent.

The physical/chemical input parameters for PRZM and EXAMS appear in Table 2.

Table 2.  Physical/chemical PRZM and EXAMS input parameters.
                                Model Parameter
                                     Value
                                   Comments
Molecular Weight
344.8
Quizalofop Acid
Water Solubility
0.4 mg/l
Parent quizalofop-p-ethyl
Vapor Pressure
3 x 10-7 torr (mm Hg)
Parent quizalofop-p-ethyl
Spray Drift
6.4%
Ground application only
Aerobic Soil Metabolism t(1/2)
407 days
Combined parent, quizalofop-acid, and bound residues (Ascn # 146697 and MRID 43235603)
Anaerobic Soil Metabolism t(1/2)
Stable
Ascn # 146696 is unacceptable.
Aerobic Aquatic Degradation t(1/2)
814 days
2 x aerobic soil metabolism t(1/2)
Anaerobic Aquatic Degradation t(1/2)
420 days
Combined parent, quizalofop-acid, and bound residues (Ascn # 146697)
Aqueous Photolysis t(1/2)
85.4 days
Combined parent and quizalofop-acid (Ascn # 146693)
Hydrolysis t(1/2)
Stable
Combined parent and quizalofop-acid (No MRID located  -  based on DER only)
Kd/Koc
256 ml/g
Mean quizalofop-acid Koc (136, 90, 372, 425) (Ascn # 146947)

The chemical input parameters for SCIGROW are tabulated in Table 3.

Table 3.  Physical/Chemical Input Parameters for SCI-GROW.
                                Model Parameter
                                     Value
                                   Comments
Application Rate
                            Corn: 0.0825 lbs a.i./A
                          Sorghum : 0.1375 lbs a.i./A
Maximum seasonal rate for corn and sorghum use
Aerobic Soil Metabolism t(1/2)
                                   407 days
Combined parent, quizalofop-acid, and bound residues (Ascn # 146697 and MRID 43235603)
Partition coefficient - Koc
                                    90 ml/g
Mean quizalofop-acid Koc (136, 90, 372, 425)

IV.	Results

For surface water sources, the estimated drinking water concentrations are presented in Table 4. The values shown have been adjusted with the 0.87 (national-scale default) PCA value because quizalofop-p-ethyl is used on other crops in addition to the corn and sorghum uses considered in this assessment. The outputs of PE5 runs are presented in Appendix B.

Table 4. Estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWC) from surface water sources adjusted with 87% PCA (percent cropped area).
                                    State
                                  1-in-10 yr
                                 Peak (ug/L)
                                  1-in-10 yr
                              Annual Mean (ug/L)
                                   Overall
                              Annual Mean (ug/L)
                                     Corn
Illinois
                                     2.051
                                     0.771
                                     0.610
Mississippi
                                     3.526
                                     0.720
                                     0.397
North Carolina
                                     1.523
                                     0.486
                                     0.357
Ohio
                                     2.690
                                     1.093
                                     0.565
Pennsylvania
                                     2.041
                                     0.715
                                     0.488
                                    Sorghum
Kansas
                                     6.509
                                     2.006
                                     1.306

For ground water sources, the highest SCI-GROW estimated drinking water concentration is 1.29 ug/L (sorghum scenario) and is assumed to be representative for both acute and chronic purposes. The SCI-GROW output is also included in Appendix B.

Appendix A  -  Chemical Structures of Parent and Degradates

Table A.  Chemical Names and Structures of Quizalofop-p-ethyl and its Degradates.
Chemical Name
                                   Structure
Quizalofop-p-ethyl

IUPAC name:  ethyl (R)-2-[4-(6-chloroquinoxalin-2-yloxy)phenoxy]propionate

CAS name:  ethyl (2R)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoate

Quizalofop acid

IUPAC name:  (RS)-2-[4-(6-chloroquinoxalin-2-yloxy)phenoxy]propionic acid

CAS name:  2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid

3-OH-quizalofop acid

CAS name:  (R)-2-[4-(6-chloro-3-hydroxyquinoxalin-2-yloxy)phenoxy]propionic acid

Phenol 1

Hydroxylated Phenol 1

Phenol 2

hydroxy phenol 2

CAS name:  6-chloroquinoxaline-2,3-diol

Phenol 3

Phenol 4

Appendix B  -  PE5 (surface water) and SCI-GROW (ground water) outputs

                                 Surface Water
Corn
Illinois

stored as Quiz.out
Chemical: Quizalofop
PRZM environment: ILCornSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 13:55:34
EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08
Metfile: w14842.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:08
Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly
1961	1.473	1.444	1.346	1.171	1.108	0.4749
1962	1.91	1.876	1.796	1.67	1.543	0.824
1963	1.499	1.47	1.406	1.26	1.156	0.6985
1964	1.926	1.893	1.753	1.477	1.365	0.76
1965	0.882	0.8666	0.8319	0.7889	0.7643	0.597
1966	1.643	1.613	1.535	1.351	1.256	0.7639
1967	1.338	1.313	1.24	1.087	0.994	0.6387
1968	3.556	3.491	3.29	2.925	2.875	1.407
1969	1.586	1.556	1.484	1.336	1.216	0.8
1970	1.449	1.421	1.323	1.236	1.206	0.6864
1971	1.607	1.577	1.503	1.36	1.242	0.688
1972	1.398	1.372	1.305	1.196	1.1	0.6202
1973	1.139	1.117	1.072	0.9658	0.8747	0.4944
1974	1.986	1.949	1.809	1.67	1.568	0.7574
1975	1.422	1.396	1.352	1.265	1.225	0.6786
1976	1.897	1.86	1.717	1.572	1.443	0.7898
1977	1.499	1.48	1.389	1.195	1.076	0.6294
1978	1.594	1.565	1.452	1.33	1.272	0.7074
1979	1.146	1.124	1.037	0.8771	0.7936	0.4919
1980	4.787	4.689	4.358	3.686	3.287	1.432
1981	1.427	1.401	1.333	1.292	1.2	0.7937
1982	1.894	1.859	1.766	1.618	1.479	0.8195
1983	0.9203	0.903	0.8533	0.7665	0.7062	0.4905
1984	1.754	1.727	1.661	1.518	1.388	0.6672
1985	0.9101	0.8963	0.865	0.7655	0.6992	0.4367
1986	2.399	2.353	2.195	2.04	1.863	0.8927
1987	1.482	1.454	1.343	1.15	1.114	0.6732
1988	0.4989	0.4901	0.4671	0.4205	0.4169	0.3298
1989	0.4327	0.4279	0.4087	0.3722	0.3647	0.2855
1990	1.892	1.855	1.739	1.555	1.461	0.6951

Sorted results
Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly
0.032258064516129	4.787	4.689	4.358	3.686	3.287	1.432
0.0645161290322581	3.556	3.491	3.29	2.925	2.875	1.407
0.0967741935483871	2.399	2.353	2.195	2.04	1.863	0.8927
0.129032258064516	1.986	1.949	1.809	1.67	1.568	0.824
0.161290322580645	1.926	1.893	1.796	1.67	1.543	0.8195
0.193548387096774	1.91	1.876	1.766	1.618	1.479	0.8
0.225806451612903	1.897	1.86	1.753	1.572	1.461	0.7937
0.258064516129032	1.894	1.859	1.739	1.555	1.443	0.7898
0.290322580645161	1.892	1.855	1.717	1.518	1.388	0.7639
0.32258064516129	1.754	1.727	1.661	1.477	1.365	0.76
0.354838709677419	1.643	1.613	1.535	1.36	1.272	0.7574
0.387096774193548	1.607	1.577	1.503	1.351	1.256	0.7074
0.419354838709677	1.594	1.565	1.484	1.336	1.242	0.6985
0.451612903225806	1.586	1.556	1.452	1.33	1.225	0.6951
0.483870967741936	1.499	1.48	1.406	1.292	1.216	0.688
0.516129032258065	1.499	1.47	1.389	1.265	1.206	0.6864
0.548387096774194	1.482	1.454	1.352	1.26	1.2	0.6786
0.580645161290323	1.473	1.444	1.346	1.236	1.156	0.6732
0.612903225806452	1.449	1.421	1.343	1.196	1.114	0.6672
0.645161290322581	1.427	1.401	1.333	1.195	1.108	0.6387
0.67741935483871	1.422	1.396	1.323	1.171	1.1	0.6294
0.709677419354839	1.398	1.372	1.305	1.15	1.076	0.6202
0.741935483870968	1.338	1.313	1.24	1.087	0.994	0.597
0.774193548387097	1.146	1.124	1.072	0.9658	0.8747	0.4944
0.806451612903226	1.139	1.117	1.037	0.8771	0.7936	0.4919
0.838709677419355	0.9203	0.903	0.865	0.7889	0.7643	0.4905
0.870967741935484	0.9101	0.8963	0.8533	0.7665	0.7062	0.4749
0.903225806451613	0.882	0.8666	0.8319	0.7655	0.6992	0.4367
0.935483870967742	0.4989	0.4901	0.4671	0.4205	0.4169	0.3298
0.967741935483871	0.4327	0.4279	0.4087	0.3722	0.3647	0.2855

0.1	2.3577	2.3126	2.1564	2.003	1.8335	0.88583
					Average of yearly averages:	0.70078

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:
Output File: Quiz
Metfile:	w14842.dvf
PRZM scenario:	ILCornSTD.txt
EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv
Chemical Name:	Quizalofop
Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments
Molecular weight	mwt	344.8	g/mol
Henry's Law Const.	henry		atm-m^3/mol
Vapor Pressure	vapr	3e-7	torr
Solubility	sol	0.4	mg/L
Kd	Kd		mg/L
Koc	Koc	256	mg/L
Photolysis half-life	kdp	85.4	days	Half-life
Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	814	days	Halfife
Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	420	days	Halfife
Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	407	days	Halfife
Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life
Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual
Incorporation Depth:	DEPI		cm
Application Rate:	TAPP	.092	kg/ha
Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	.99	fraction
Spray Drift	DRFT	.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond
Application Date	Date	15-05	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm
Record 17:	FILTRA
	IPSCND	1
	UPTKF
Record 18:	PLVKRT
	PLDKRT
	FEXTRC	0.5
Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir
Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

Mississippi

stored as Quiz.out
Chemical: Quizalofop
PRZM environment: MScornSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 13:57:40
EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08
Metfile: w03940.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:14
Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly
1961	1.475	1.42	1.216	0.9728	0.8375	0.2852
1962	1.196	1.151	1.034	0.8091	0.6733	0.2374
1963	1.743	1.678	1.438	1.136	0.9668	0.3944
1964	4.065	3.91	3.343	2.508	2.074	0.6933
1965	0.2542	0.2453	0.212	0.1777	0.1683	0.0991
1966	2.605	2.535	2.261	1.791	1.554	0.5271
1967	4.698	4.548	4.054	3.161	2.618	0.8693
1968	2.095	2.039	1.811	1.497	1.245	0.4363
1969	0.3745	0.3609	0.3105	0.2827	0.287	0.1396
1970	1.516	1.459	1.25	1.004	0.8416	0.2957
1971	3.072	2.958	2.596	2.049	1.709	0.5704
1972	2.075	2.017	1.938	1.495	1.231	0.4223
1973	1.313	1.264	1.11	0.8825	0.7497	0.2626
1974	1.101	1.06	0.9077	0.6656	0.5798	0.2243
1975	3.221	3.106	2.757	2.136	1.751	0.5731
1976	2.363	2.275	2.05	1.647	1.373	0.484
1977	0.9877	0.9557	0.8536	0.7211	0.6873	0.2804
1978	2.232	2.149	2.031	1.547	1.275	0.4352
1979	3.808	3.672	3.39	2.798	2.401	0.8297
1980	3.598	3.468	3.205	2.756	2.3	0.786
1981	2.304	2.217	2.029	1.558	1.283	0.4506
1982	1.871	1.801	1.563	1.191	1.029	0.4279
1983	5.582	5.408	4.677	3.545	2.908	0.9571
1984	2.033	1.957	1.716	1.355	1.132	0.4132
1985	0.4445	0.4284	0.3784	0.3463	0.3163	0.1589
1986	2.477	2.384	2.127	1.631	1.355	0.4528
1987	1.418	1.365	1.201	0.9942	0.8794	0.3233
1988	0.8136	0.7833	0.6858	0.5568	0.5303	0.2286
1989	3.946	3.827	3.573	2.907	2.407	0.807
1990	3.129	3.014	2.628	2.153	1.825	0.6357

Sorted results
Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly
0.032258064516129	5.582	5.408	4.677	3.545	2.908	0.9571
0.0645161290322581	4.698	4.548	4.054	3.161	2.618	0.8693
0.0967741935483871	4.065	3.91	3.573	2.907	2.407	0.8297
0.129032258064516	3.946	3.827	3.39	2.798	2.401	0.807
0.161290322580645	3.808	3.672	3.343	2.756	2.3	0.786
0.193548387096774	3.598	3.468	3.205	2.508	2.074	0.6933
0.225806451612903	3.221	3.106	2.757	2.153	1.825	0.6357
0.258064516129032	3.129	3.014	2.628	2.136	1.751	0.5731
0.290322580645161	3.072	2.958	2.596	2.049	1.709	0.5704
0.32258064516129	2.605	2.535	2.261	1.791	1.554	0.5271
0.354838709677419	2.477	2.384	2.127	1.647	1.373	0.484
0.387096774193548	2.363	2.275	2.05	1.631	1.355	0.4528
0.419354838709677	2.304	2.217	2.031	1.558	1.283	0.4506
0.451612903225806	2.232	2.149	2.029	1.547	1.275	0.4363
0.483870967741936	2.095	2.039	1.938	1.497	1.245	0.4352
0.516129032258065	2.075	2.017	1.811	1.495	1.231	0.4279
0.548387096774194	2.033	1.957	1.716	1.355	1.132	0.4223
0.580645161290323	1.871	1.801	1.563	1.191	1.029	0.4132
0.612903225806452	1.743	1.678	1.438	1.136	0.9668	0.3944
0.645161290322581	1.516	1.459	1.25	1.004	0.8794	0.3233
0.67741935483871	1.475	1.42	1.216	0.9942	0.8416	0.2957
0.709677419354839	1.418	1.365	1.201	0.9728	0.8375	0.2852
0.741935483870968	1.313	1.264	1.11	0.8825	0.7497	0.2804
0.774193548387097	1.196	1.151	1.034	0.8091	0.6873	0.2626
0.806451612903226	1.101	1.06	0.9077	0.7211	0.6733	0.2374
0.838709677419355	0.9877	0.9557	0.8536	0.6656	0.5798	0.2286
0.870967741935484	0.8136	0.7833	0.6858	0.5568	0.5303	0.2243
0.903225806451613	0.4445	0.4284	0.3784	0.3463	0.3163	0.1589
0.935483870967742	0.3745	0.3609	0.3105	0.2827	0.287	0.1396
0.967741935483871	0.2542	0.2453	0.212	0.1777	0.1683	0.0991

0.1	4.0531	3.9017	3.5547	2.8961	2.4064	0.82743
					Average of yearly averages:	0.456683333333333

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:
Output File: Quiz
Metfile:	w03940.dvf
PRZM scenario:	MScornSTD.txt
EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv
Chemical Name:	Quizalofop
Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments
Molecular weight	mwt	344.8	g/mol
Henry's Law Const.	henry		atm-m^3/mol
Vapor Pressure	vapr	3e-7	torr
Solubility	sol	0.4	mg/L
Kd	Kd		mg/L
Koc	Koc	256	mg/L
Photolysis half-life	kdp	85.4	days	Half-life
Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	814	days	Halfife
Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	420	days	Halfife
Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	407	days	Halfife
Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life
Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual
Incorporation Depth:	DEPI		cm
Application Rate:	TAPP	.092	kg/ha
Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	.99	fraction
Spray Drift	DRFT	.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond
Application Date	Date	24-04	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm
Record 17:	FILTRA
	IPSCND	1
	UPTKF
Record 18:	PLVKRT
	PLDKRT
	FEXTRC	0.5
Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir
Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

North Carolina

stored as Quiz.out
Chemical: Quizalofop
PRZM environment: NCcornESTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 13:58:28
EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08
Metfile: w13722.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:28
Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly
1961	0.94	0.921	0.853	0.7439	0.6786	0.2907
1962	0.7011	0.6877	0.6589	0.5835	0.5296	0.2852
1963	1.277	1.253	1.157	1.017	0.9112	0.4273
1964	0.5814	0.5705	0.5278	0.504	0.4624	0.2817
1965	1.785	1.749	1.658	1.419	1.268	0.5783
1966	1.083	1.063	0.9834	0.8805	0.8128	0.4566
1967	0.9625	0.9443	0.8834	0.7626	0.7307	0.3915
1968	0.5957	0.5846	0.5458	0.4811	0.4369	0.2541
1969	0.9684	0.9497	0.8836	0.8022	0.7355	0.3516
1970	0.7295	0.7155	0.6848	0.6001	0.5825	0.327
1971	1.326	1.3	1.208	1.102	1.002	0.4714
1972	2.233	2.191	2.05	1.876	1.723	0.8028
1973	0.6932	0.6811	0.6468	0.6157	0.5748	0.3743
1974	1.346	1.32	1.249	1.083	0.9809	0.4647
1975	0.7256	0.7119	0.6675	0.5762	0.5223	0.2983
1976	0.9499	0.9314	0.9021	0.802	0.7183	0.3462
1977	0.8238	0.8099	0.7485	0.6336	0.5718	0.3071
1978	1.09	1.069	1.024	0.9021	0.8205	0.3923
1979	0.7238	0.7106	0.6787	0.6326	0.5867	0.3081
1980	1.408	1.381	1.274	1.077	1.013	0.5049
1981	0.9542	0.9365	0.8869	0.7907	0.7273	0.4054
1982	0.809	0.7938	0.7606	0.6681	0.6031	0.3182
1983	0.9009	0.8835	0.8327	0.7174	0.6404	0.3183
1984	1.754	1.723	1.586	1.351	1.204	0.5476
1985	1.355	1.33	1.267	1.17	1.079	0.5476
1986	1.589	1.559	1.439	1.246	1.135	0.556
1987	0.7524	0.7382	0.6824	0.5806	0.5397	0.3476
1988	0.699	0.6857	0.6338	0.5621	0.5085	0.2748
1989	1.715	1.681	1.581	1.39	1.251	0.5584
1990	1.404	1.377	1.298	1.176	1.058	0.5163

Sorted results
Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly
0.032258064516129	2.233	2.191	2.05	1.876	1.723	0.8028
0.0645161290322581	1.785	1.749	1.658	1.419	1.268	0.5783
0.0967741935483871	1.754	1.723	1.586	1.39	1.251	0.5584
0.129032258064516	1.715	1.681	1.581	1.351	1.204	0.556
0.161290322580645	1.589	1.559	1.439	1.246	1.135	0.5476
0.193548387096774	1.408	1.381	1.298	1.176	1.079	0.5476
0.225806451612903	1.404	1.377	1.274	1.17	1.058	0.5163
0.258064516129032	1.355	1.33	1.267	1.102	1.013	0.5049
0.290322580645161	1.346	1.32	1.249	1.083	1.002	0.4714
0.32258064516129	1.326	1.3	1.208	1.077	0.9809	0.4647
0.354838709677419	1.277	1.253	1.157	1.017	0.9112	0.4566
0.387096774193548	1.09	1.069	1.024	0.9021	0.8205	0.4273
0.419354838709677	1.083	1.063	0.9834	0.8805	0.8128	0.4054
0.451612903225806	0.9684	0.9497	0.9021	0.8022	0.7355	0.3923
0.483870967741936	0.9625	0.9443	0.8869	0.802	0.7307	0.3915
0.516129032258065	0.9542	0.9365	0.8836	0.7907	0.7273	0.3743
0.548387096774194	0.9499	0.9314	0.8834	0.7626	0.7183	0.3516
0.580645161290323	0.94	0.921	0.853	0.7439	0.6786	0.3476
0.612903225806452	0.9009	0.8835	0.8327	0.7174	0.6404	0.3462
0.645161290322581	0.8238	0.8099	0.7606	0.6681	0.6031	0.327
0.67741935483871	0.809	0.7938	0.7485	0.6336	0.5867	0.3183
0.709677419354839	0.7524	0.7382	0.6848	0.6326	0.5825	0.3182
0.741935483870968	0.7295	0.7155	0.6824	0.6157	0.5748	0.3081
0.774193548387097	0.7256	0.7119	0.6787	0.6001	0.5718	0.3071
0.806451612903226	0.7238	0.7106	0.6675	0.5835	0.5397	0.2983
0.838709677419355	0.7011	0.6877	0.6589	0.5806	0.5296	0.2907
0.870967741935484	0.699	0.6857	0.6468	0.5762	0.5223	0.2852
0.903225806451613	0.6932	0.6811	0.6338	0.5621	0.5085	0.2817
0.935483870967742	0.5957	0.5846	0.5458	0.504	0.4624	0.2748
0.967741935483871	0.5814	0.5705	0.5278	0.4811	0.4369	0.2541

0.1	1.7501	1.7188	1.5855	1.3861	1.2463	0.55816
					Average of yearly averages:	0.410143333333333

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:
Output File: Quiz
Metfile:	w13722.dvf
PRZM scenario:	NCcornESTD.txt
EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv
Chemical Name:	Quizalofop
Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments
Molecular weight	mwt	344.8	g/mol
Henry's Law Const.	henry		atm-m^3/mol
Vapor Pressure	vapr	3e-7	torr
Solubility	sol	0.4	mg/L
Kd	Kd		mg/L
Koc	Koc	256	mg/L
Photolysis half-life	kdp	85.4	days	Half-life
Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	814	days	Halfife
Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	420	days	Halfife
Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	407	days	Halfife
Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life
Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual
Incorporation Depth:	DEPI		cm
Application Rate:	TAPP	.092	kg/ha
Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	.99	fraction
Spray Drift	DRFT	.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond
Application Date	Date	29-04	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm
Record 17:	FILTRA
	IPSCND	1
	UPTKF
Record 18:	PLVKRT
	PLDKRT
	FEXTRC	0.5
Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir
Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

Ohio

stored as Quiz.out
Chemical: Quizalofop
PRZM environment: OHCornSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 13:59:54
EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08
Metfile: w93815.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:16:20
Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly
1961	1.619	1.588	1.468	1.292	1.196	0.5063
1962	1.688	1.657	1.537	1.4	1.32	0.6977
1963	1.329	1.316	1.232	1.152	1.07	0.597
1964	0.5927	0.5827	0.5432	0.4895	0.4481	0.3111
1965	0.921	0.9042	0.8373	0.7246	0.6579	0.3376
1966	0.4584	0.4507	0.4203	0.3892	0.3898	0.2458
1967	1.696	1.668	1.556	1.408	1.362	0.6782
1968	3.682	3.627	3.426	2.998	2.7	1.271
1969	2.666	2.62	2.442	2.238	2.07	1.128
1970	1.078	1.061	1.008	0.9239	0.8581	0.5644
1971	0.8054	0.791	0.7416	0.6941	0.6426	0.3677
1972	1.134	1.122	1.051	0.9029	0.8237	0.4362
1973	0.8434	0.831	0.8061	0.7328	0.6704	0.3738
1974	2.596	2.551	2.388	2.289	2.166	1.027
1975	0.946	0.9353	0.8787	0.7874	0.7536	0.5463
1976	0.8604	0.8458	0.8114	0.7588	0.7027	0.3936
1977	0.5858	0.5781	0.5487	0.4961	0.484	0.3049
1978	1.092	1.072	1.032	0.9263	0.8497	0.4442
1979	0.995	0.9772	0.9076	0.8415	0.7754	0.4284
1980	2.717	2.669	2.479	2.237	2.054	0.9482
1981	3.043	2.986	2.853	2.482	2.234	1.122
1982	1.791	1.762	1.652	1.467	1.335	0.7864
1983	1.418	1.393	1.3	1.163	1.068	0.5826
1984	1.735	1.709	1.603	1.396	1.268	0.6539
1985	0.5392	0.5309	0.4979	0.462	0.4359	0.3101
1986	0.8866	0.8704	0.8265	0.7769	0.7084	0.3512
1987	0.8198	0.8092	0.755	0.6782	0.6411	0.3569
1988	0.8263	0.812	0.7869	0.7181	0.6666	0.3838
1989	6.147	6.037	5.659	4.934	4.438	1.93
1990	3.098	3.057	2.909	2.574	2.374	1.401

Sorted results
Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly
0.032258064516129	6.147	6.037	5.659	4.934	4.438	1.93
0.0645161290322581	3.682	3.627	3.426	2.998	2.7	1.401
0.0967741935483871	3.098	3.057	2.909	2.574	2.374	1.271
0.129032258064516	3.043	2.986	2.853	2.482	2.234	1.128
0.161290322580645	2.717	2.669	2.479	2.289	2.166	1.122
0.193548387096774	2.666	2.62	2.442	2.238	2.07	1.027
0.225806451612903	2.596	2.551	2.388	2.237	2.054	0.9482
0.258064516129032	1.791	1.762	1.652	1.467	1.362	0.7864
0.290322580645161	1.735	1.709	1.603	1.408	1.335	0.6977
0.32258064516129	1.696	1.668	1.556	1.4	1.32	0.6782
0.354838709677419	1.688	1.657	1.537	1.396	1.268	0.6539
0.387096774193548	1.619	1.588	1.468	1.292	1.196	0.597
0.419354838709677	1.418	1.393	1.3	1.163	1.07	0.5826
0.451612903225806	1.329	1.316	1.232	1.152	1.068	0.5644
0.483870967741936	1.134	1.122	1.051	0.9263	0.8581	0.5463
0.516129032258065	1.092	1.072	1.032	0.9239	0.8497	0.5063
0.548387096774194	1.078	1.061	1.008	0.9029	0.8237	0.4442
0.580645161290323	0.995	0.9772	0.9076	0.8415	0.7754	0.4362
0.612903225806452	0.946	0.9353	0.8787	0.7874	0.7536	0.4284
0.645161290322581	0.921	0.9042	0.8373	0.7769	0.7084	0.3936
0.67741935483871	0.8866	0.8704	0.8265	0.7588	0.7027	0.3838
0.709677419354839	0.8604	0.8458	0.8114	0.7328	0.6704	0.3738
0.741935483870968	0.8434	0.831	0.8061	0.7246	0.6666	0.3677
0.774193548387097	0.8263	0.812	0.7869	0.7181	0.6579	0.3569
0.806451612903226	0.8198	0.8092	0.755	0.6941	0.6426	0.3512
0.838709677419355	0.8054	0.791	0.7416	0.6782	0.6411	0.3376
0.870967741935484	0.5927	0.5827	0.5487	0.4961	0.484	0.3111
0.903225806451613	0.5858	0.5781	0.5432	0.4895	0.4481	0.3101
0.935483870967742	0.5392	0.5309	0.4979	0.462	0.4359	0.3049
0.967741935483871	0.4584	0.4507	0.4203	0.3892	0.3898	0.2458

0.1	3.0925	3.0499	2.9034	2.5648	2.36	1.2567
					Average of yearly averages:	0.64951

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:
Output File: Quiz
Metfile:	w93815.dvf
PRZM scenario:	OHCornSTD.txt
EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv
Chemical Name:	Quizalofop
Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments
Molecular weight	mwt	344.8	g/mol
Henry's Law Const.	henry		atm-m^3/mol
Vapor Pressure	vapr	3e-7	torr
Solubility	sol	0.4	mg/L
Kd	Kd		mg/L
Koc	Koc	256	mg/L
Photolysis half-life	kdp	85.4	days	Half-life
Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	814	days	Halfife
Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	420	days	Halfife
Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	407	days	Halfife
Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life
Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual
Incorporation Depth:	DEPI		cm
Application Rate:	TAPP	.092	kg/ha
Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	.99	fraction
Spray Drift	DRFT	.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond
Application Date	Date	15-05	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm
Record 17:	FILTRA
	IPSCND	1
	UPTKF
Record 18:	PLVKRT
	PLDKRT
	FEXTRC	0.5
Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir
Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

Pennsylvania

stored as Quiz.out
Chemical: Quizalofop
PRZM environment: PAcornSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 14:01:58
EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08
Metfile: w14751.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:00
Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly
1961	1.041	1.029	0.9717	0.9353	0.8785	0.3664
1962	0.5865	0.5771	0.5399	0.479	0.4784	0.3853
1963	0.361	0.3551	0.3321	0.3074	0.2956	0.2589
1964	0.8833	0.8682	0.809	0.769	0.7279	0.4636
1965	0.4666	0.4592	0.4316	0.4164	0.4169	0.3309
1966	1.742	1.709	1.619	1.475	1.368	0.5505
1967	1.043	1.028	0.9759	0.9288	0.8765	0.7204
1968	1.725	1.694	1.592	1.374	1.239	0.6906
1969	2.364	2.32	2.152	1.867	1.687	0.8226
1970	0.9261	0.9112	0.8668	0.809	0.7572	0.5812
1971	0.7976	0.7841	0.7309	0.661	0.6053	0.4085
1972	3.238	3.177	2.944	2.502	2.244	1.031
1973	1.488	1.463	1.364	1.192	1.085	0.7363
1974	0.9603	0.9464	0.89	0.8259	0.7994	0.5694
1975	1.193	1.173	1.105	1.012	0.975	0.5889
1976	0.9523	0.9362	0.8726	0.7821	0.757	0.4675
1977	0.3762	0.3704	0.347	0.3081	0.3051	0.2542
1978	1.109	1.09	1.034	0.9303	0.9202	0.4886
1979	0.7356	0.7235	0.6759	0.6272	0.613	0.4068
1980	1.257	1.236	1.151	1.003	0.9154	0.51
1981	0.5943	0.5849	0.5623	0.5171	0.4968	0.3797
1982	2.75	2.702	2.642	2.366	2.154	0.9791
1983	1.117	1.099	1.032	0.9018	0.8191	0.5669
1984	1.461	1.436	1.393	1.294	1.197	0.6195
1985	1.675	1.648	1.568	1.407	1.312	0.7169
1986	1.066	1.051	1.002	0.879	0.822	0.5264
1987	0.9247	0.9096	0.8482	0.7395	0.6908	0.4801
1988	0.7558	0.7435	0.7052	0.6211	0.6056	0.3974
1989	2.185	2.147	2.04	1.847	1.698	0.8164
1990	1.651	1.623	1.51	1.336	1.238	0.7197

Sorted results
Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly
0.032258064516129	3.238	3.177	2.944	2.502	2.244	1.031
0.0645161290322581	2.75	2.702	2.642	2.366	2.154	0.9791
0.0967741935483871	2.364	2.32	2.152	1.867	1.698	0.8226
0.129032258064516	2.185	2.147	2.04	1.847	1.687	0.8164
0.161290322580645	1.742	1.709	1.619	1.475	1.368	0.7363
0.193548387096774	1.725	1.694	1.592	1.407	1.312	0.7204
0.225806451612903	1.675	1.648	1.568	1.374	1.239	0.7197
0.258064516129032	1.651	1.623	1.51	1.336	1.238	0.7169
0.290322580645161	1.488	1.463	1.393	1.294	1.197	0.6906
0.32258064516129	1.461	1.436	1.364	1.192	1.085	0.6195
0.354838709677419	1.257	1.236	1.151	1.012	0.975	0.5889
0.387096774193548	1.193	1.173	1.105	1.003	0.9202	0.5812
0.419354838709677	1.117	1.099	1.034	0.9353	0.9154	0.5694
0.451612903225806	1.109	1.09	1.032	0.9303	0.8785	0.5669
0.483870967741936	1.066	1.051	1.002	0.9288	0.8765	0.5505
0.516129032258065	1.043	1.029	0.9759	0.9018	0.822	0.5264
0.548387096774194	1.041	1.028	0.9717	0.879	0.8191	0.51
0.580645161290323	0.9603	0.9464	0.89	0.8259	0.7994	0.4886
0.612903225806452	0.9523	0.9362	0.8726	0.809	0.7572	0.4801
0.645161290322581	0.9261	0.9112	0.8668	0.7821	0.757	0.4675
0.67741935483871	0.9247	0.9096	0.8482	0.769	0.7279	0.4636
0.709677419354839	0.8833	0.8682	0.809	0.7395	0.6908	0.4085
0.741935483870968	0.7976	0.7841	0.7309	0.661	0.613	0.4068
0.774193548387097	0.7558	0.7435	0.7052	0.6272	0.6056	0.3974
0.806451612903226	0.7356	0.7235	0.6759	0.6211	0.6053	0.3853
0.838709677419355	0.5943	0.5849	0.5623	0.5171	0.4968	0.3797
0.870967741935484	0.5865	0.5771	0.5399	0.479	0.4784	0.3664
0.903225806451613	0.4666	0.4592	0.4316	0.4164	0.4169	0.3309
0.935483870967742	0.3762	0.3704	0.347	0.3081	0.3051	0.2589
0.967741935483871	0.361	0.3551	0.3321	0.3074	0.2956	0.2542

0.1	2.3461	2.3027	2.1408	1.865	1.6969	0.82198
					Average of yearly averages:	0.561123333333333

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:
Output File: Quiz
Metfile:	w14751.dvf
PRZM scenario:	PAcornSTD.txt
EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv
Chemical Name:	Quizalofop
Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments
Molecular weight	mwt	344.8	g/mol
Henry's Law Const.	henry		atm-m^3/mol
Vapor Pressure	vapr	3e-7	torr
Solubility	sol	0.4	mg/L
Kd	Kd		mg/L
Koc	Koc	256	mg/L
Photolysis half-life	kdp	85.4	days	Half-life
Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	814	days	Halfife
Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	420	days	Halfife
Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	407	days	Halfife
Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life
Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual
Incorporation Depth:	DEPI		cm
Application Rate:	TAPP	.092	kg/ha
Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	.99	fraction
Spray Drift	DRFT	.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond
Application Date	Date	30-04	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm
Record 17:	FILTRA
	IPSCND	1
	UPTKF
Record 18:	PLVKRT
	PLDKRT
	FEXTRC	0.5
Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir
Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

Sorghum
Kansas

stored as Quiz.out
Chemical: Quizalofop
PRZM environment: KSsorghumSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 13:55:46
EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08
Metfile: w13996.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:52
Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly
1961	2.839	2.786	2.596	2.45	2.318	0.6943
1962	7.61	7.458	6.916	6.068	5.457	2.245
1963	2.84	2.806	2.671	2.402	2.224	1.304
1964	8.935	8.76	8.089	6.986	6.389	2.377
1965	3.966	3.916	3.718	3.326	3.059	2.267
1966	2.333	2.291	2.124	1.819	1.634	1.129
1967	3.584	3.517	3.323	2.898	2.687	1.233
1968	3.143	3.085	2.951	2.573	2.368	1.32
1969	1.764	1.742	1.654	1.469	1.339	1.031
1970	3.689	3.638	3.391	2.927	2.625	1.128
1971	4.054	3.978	3.68	3.178	2.437	1.233
1972	4.35	4.268	3.946	3.429	3.161	1.829
1973	8.952	8.802	8.31	7.264	6.553	2.491
1974	4.319	4.263	4.04	3.58	3.268	2.304
1975	2.505	2.46	2.3	2.054	1.95	1.213
1976	1.626	1.604	1.519	1.344	1.226	0.8279
1977	5.735	5.62	5.325	4.659	4.214	1.589
1978	6.33	6.211	5.813	4.992	4.533	2.14
1979	5.216	5.121	4.769	4.248	4.024	2.306
1980	4.831	4.743	4.481	3.917	3.416	1.901
1981	2.847	2.81	2.659	2.415	2.285	1.703
1982	1.774	1.752	1.663	1.497	1.38	1.021
1983	2.327	2.284	2.144	1.9	1.689	0.897
1984	2.472	2.426	2.243	2.13	1.963	1.059
1985	3.125	3.082	3.024	2.743	2.491	1.227
1986	3.149	3.093	2.935	2.64	2.453	1.296
1987	3.245	3.183	2.996	2.627	2.408	1.325
1988	1.327	1.311	1.249	1.127	1.041	0.6666
1989	4.72	4.636	4.321	3.838	3.485	1.401
1990	4.721	4.631	4.301	3.809	3.647	1.892

Sorted results
Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly
0.032258064516129	8.952	8.802	8.31	7.264	6.553	2.491
0.0645161290322581	8.935	8.76	8.089	6.986	6.389	2.377
0.0967741935483871	7.61	7.458	6.916	6.068	5.457	2.306
0.129032258064516	6.33	6.211	5.813	4.992	4.533	2.304
0.161290322580645	5.735	5.62	5.325	4.659	4.214	2.267
0.193548387096774	5.216	5.121	4.769	4.248	4.024	2.245
0.225806451612903	4.831	4.743	4.481	3.917	3.647	2.14
0.258064516129032	4.721	4.636	4.321	3.838	3.485	1.901
0.290322580645161	4.72	4.631	4.301	3.809	3.416	1.892
0.32258064516129	4.35	4.268	4.04	3.58	3.268	1.829
0.354838709677419	4.319	4.263	3.946	3.429	3.161	1.703
0.387096774193548	4.054	3.978	3.718	3.326	3.059	1.589
0.419354838709677	3.966	3.916	3.68	3.178	2.687	1.401
0.451612903225806	3.689	3.638	3.391	2.927	2.625	1.325
0.483870967741936	3.584	3.517	3.323	2.898	2.491	1.32
0.516129032258065	3.245	3.183	3.024	2.743	2.453	1.304
0.548387096774194	3.149	3.093	2.996	2.64	2.437	1.296
0.580645161290323	3.143	3.085	2.951	2.627	2.408	1.233
0.612903225806452	3.125	3.082	2.935	2.573	2.368	1.233
0.645161290322581	2.847	2.81	2.671	2.45	2.318	1.227
0.67741935483871	2.84	2.806	2.659	2.415	2.285	1.213
0.709677419354839	2.839	2.786	2.596	2.402	2.224	1.129
0.741935483870968	2.505	2.46	2.3	2.13	1.963	1.128
0.774193548387097	2.472	2.426	2.243	2.054	1.95	1.059
0.806451612903226	2.333	2.291	2.144	1.9	1.689	1.031
0.838709677419355	2.327	2.284	2.124	1.819	1.634	1.021
0.870967741935484	1.774	1.752	1.663	1.497	1.38	0.897
0.903225806451613	1.764	1.742	1.654	1.469	1.339	0.8279
0.935483870967742	1.626	1.604	1.519	1.344	1.226	0.6943
0.967741935483871	1.327	1.311	1.249	1.127	1.041	0.6666

0.1	7.482	7.3333	6.8057	5.9604	5.3646	2.3058
					Average of yearly averages:	1.50166

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:
Output File: Quiz
Metfile:	w13996.dvf
PRZM scenario:	KSsorghumSTD.txt
EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv
Chemical Name:	Quizalofop
Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments
Molecular weight	mwt	344.8	g/mol
Henry's Law Const.	henry		atm-m^3/mol
Vapor Pressure	vapr	3e-7	torr
Solubility	sol	0.4	mg/L
Kd	Kd		mg/L
Koc	Koc	256	mg/L
Photolysis half-life	kdp	85.4	days	Half-life
Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	814	days	Halfife
Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	420	days	Halfife
Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	407	days	Halfife
Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life
Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual
Incorporation Depth:	DEPI		cm
Application Rate:	TAPP	.154	kg/ha
Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	.95	fraction
Spray Drift	DRFT	.05	fraction of application rate applied to pond
Application Date	Date	15-08	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm
Record 17:	FILTRA
	IPSCND	1
	UPTKF
Record 18:	PLVKRT
	PLDKRT
	FEXTRC	0.5
Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir
Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

                                 Ground Water

                           SCIGROW
                          VERSION 2.3
            ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND EFFECTS DIVISION
                 OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
             U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                        SCREENING MODEL
                FOR AQUATIC PESTICIDE EXPOSURE

 SciGrow version 2.3
 chemical:Quizalofop-p-ethyl
 time is  7/19/2011  11:28: 6
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Application      Number of       Total Use    Koc      Soil Aerobic
  rate (lb/acre)  applications   (lb/acre/yr)  (ml/g)   metabolism (days)
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
      0.138           1.0           0.138      9.00E+01      407.0
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 groundwater screening cond (ppb) =   1.29E+00
 ************************************************************************


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18062-18063]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06613]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket No. FRA-2010-0031]

Long Island Rail Road's Request To Amend Its Positive Train
Control Safety Plan and Positive Train Control System

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides the public with notice that, on March
22, 2022, Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) submitted a request for
amendment (RFA) to its FRA-approved Positive Train Control Safety Plan
(PTCSP). As this RFA may involve a request for FRA's approval of
proposed material modifications to an FRA-certified positive train
control (PTC) system, FRA is publishing this notice and inviting public
comment on the railroad's RFA to its PTCSP.

DATES: FRA will consider comments received by April 18, 2022. FRA may
consider comments received after that date to the extent practicable
and without delaying implementation of valuable or necessary
modifications to a PTC system.

ADDRESSES: Comments: Comments may be submitted by going to https://www.regulations.gov and following the online instructions for
submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and the
applicable docket number. The relevant PTC docket number for this host
railroad is Docket No. FRA-2010-0031. For convenience, all active PTC
dockets are hyperlinked on FRA's website at https://railroads.dot.gov/train-control/ptc/ptc-annual-and-quarterly-reports. All comments
received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov;
this includes any personal information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gabe Neal, Staff Director, Signal,
Train Control, and Crossings Division, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In general, Title 49 United States Code
(U.S.C.) Section 20157(h) requires FRA to certify that a host
railroad's PTC system complies with 49 CFR part 236, subpart I, before
the technology may be operated in revenue service. Before making
certain changes to an FRA-certified PTC system or the associated FRA-
approved PTCSP, a host railroad must submit, and obtain FRA's approval
of, an RFA to its PTCSP under Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) section 236.1021.
    Under 49 CFR 236.1021(e), FRA's regulations provide that FRA will
publish a notice in the Federal Register and invite public comment in
accordance with 49 CFR part 211, if an RFA includes a request for
approval of a material modification of a signal and train control
system. Accordingly, this notice informs the public that, on March 22,
2022, LIRR submitted an RFA to its PTCSP for its Advanced Civil Speed
Enforcement System II (ACSES II) and that RFA is available in Docket
No. FRA-2010-0031.
    Interested parties are invited to comment on LIRR's RFA to its
PTCSP

by submitting written comments or data. During FRA's review of this
railroad's RFA, FRA will consider any comments or data submitted within
the timeline specified in this notice and to the extent practicable,
without delaying implementation of valuable or necessary modifications
to a PTC system. See 49 CFR 236.1021; see also 49 CFR 236.1011(e).
Under 49 CFR 236.1021, FRA maintains the authority to approve, approve
with conditions, or deny a railroad's RFA to its PTCSP at FRA's sole
discretion.

Privacy Act Notice

    In accordance with 49 CFR 211.3, FRA solicits comments from the
public to better inform its decisions. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal information the commenter
provides, to https://www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of
records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See https://www.regulations.gov/privacy-notice for the privacy notice of regulations.gov. To facilitate
comment tracking, we encourage commenters to provide their name, or the
name of their organization; however, submission of names is completely
optional. If you wish to provide comments containing proprietary or
confidential information, please contact FRA for alternate submission
instructions.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Carolyn R. Hayward-Williams,
Director, Office of Railroad Systems and Technology.
[FR Doc. 2022-06613 Filed 3-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 23 (Friday, February 5, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8334-8335]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02459]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 206

[Docket ID FEMA-2020-0038]
RIN 1660-AA99

Cost of Assistance Estimates in the Disaster Declaration Process
for the Public Assistance Program; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Announcement of meeting; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is extending
the public comment period for its proposed rule published December 14,
2020, and will hold a public meeting remotely via web conference to
solicit feedback on the proposed rule. The rule proposed to
substantively revise the ``estimated cost of the assistance'' disaster
declaration factor that FEMA uses to review a Governor's request for a
major disaster under the Public Assistance Program.

DATES: Written comments on the proposed rule published at 85 FR 80719
(December 14, 2020) may be submitted until 11:59 p.m. ET on Friday,
March 12, 2021.
    The meeting will take place on Wednesday, February 24, 2021, from 1
to 3 p.m. Eastern Time (ET).
    To register in order to make remarks during the meeting, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
below by 12 p.m. ET on Tuesday, February 23, 2021.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via web conference. Members of the
public may view the public portion of the meeting online at https://fema.zoomgov.com/s/1617851830.

    Reasonable accommodations are available for people with
disabilities. To request a reasonable accommodation, contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section below as soon as
possible. Last minute requests will be accepted but may not be possible
to fulfill.
    Written comments must be submitted via the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments.
    Instructions: All written comments must include the docket ID FEMA-
2020-0038. All comments received, including any personal information
provided, may be posted without alteration at https://www.regulations.gov.
    Docket: For access to the docket and to read comments received by
FEMA, go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID FEMA-
2020-0038.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tod Wells, Deputy Division Director,
Recovery Directorate, Public Assistance, via email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or via phone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 14, 2020, FEMA published a
proposed rule titled Cost of Assistance Estimates in the Disaster
Declaration Process for the Public Assistance Program.\1\ Pursuant to
44 CFR 206.48(a), FEMA considers several factors when determining
whether to recommend that the President declare a major disaster
authorizing the Public Assistance program. In the Disaster Recovery
Reform Act of 2018 (DRRA),\2\ Congress directed FEMA to generally
review those factors, specifically the estimated cost of the assistance
factor, and to update them through rulemaking, as appropriate.\3\
Congress also directed FEMA to give greater consideration to the recent
multiple disasters and localized impacts factors \4\ when evaluating a
request for a major disaster.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 85 FR 80719.
    \2\ Public Law 115-254, 132 Stat. 3438 (Oct. 5, 2018).
    \3\ DRRA sec. 1239.
    \4\ 44 CFR 206.48(a)(2), (5).
    \5\ DRRA sec. 1232.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 20, 2021, Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff
Ronald A. Klain issued a memorandum titled ``Regulatory Freeze Pending
Review'' to ensure that President Biden's appointees or designees have
the opportunity to review pending rules.\6\ This regulatory freeze does
not require FEMA to withdraw pending notices of proposed rulemaking out
for public comment, but the agency wants to ensure the memorandum's
intent is met and all parties are given ample opportunity to provide
input. FEMA is therefore extending the comment period for this rule
from February 12 to March 12, 2021, and will also hold a public meeting
on February 24, 2021, to solicit feedback on the proposed rule. These
measures will help ensure all interested parties have sufficient
opportunity to review and provide comments on the proposed changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Memorandum on Regulatory Freeze Pending Review for the
Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies (Jan. 20, 2021),
available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/20/regulatory-freeze-pending-review/ (last visited
Jan. 22, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As published on December 14, 2020, FEMA proposes to amend the
estimated cost of the assistance factor in 44 CFR 206.48(a)(1) to raise
the per capita indicator and the minimum threshold. As is detailed in
the proposed rule, the current per capita indicator and minimum
threshold do not provide an accurate measure of States' capabilities to
respond to disasters.\7\ FEMA does not propose to substantively revise
the localized impacts factor because it is already sufficiently
flexible to address the requirements of section 1232 of the DRRA. FEMA
also does not propose any revisions to the recent multiple disasters
factor, but requests comment on whether the 12-month time limit
currently in place is sufficient to address this factor as required by
the DRRA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 85 FR 80719.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    DRRA further provided that FEMA shall engage in meaningful
consultation with relevant representatives of State regional, local,
and Indian tribal government stakeholders.\8\ FEMA's public meeting
will solicit feedback on the proposed rule from these stakeholders in
fulfillment of this requirement. FEMA welcomes input, both at the
meeting and in written comments submitted separately, on considerations
of local economic factors such as the local assessable tax base; the
local sales tax; the median income and poverty rate of the local
affected area as it compares to that of the State and the economic
health of the State, including such factors as the State unemployment
rate compared to the national rate; and how such factors can be used to
evaluate whether the affected State and local governments have been
overwhelmed.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Id.
    \9\ See Explanatory Statement for H.R.133, Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2021, 166 Cong. Rec. H8479 (daily ed. Dec. 21,
2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FEMA will carefully consider all relevant comments received during
the meeting, and during the rest of the comment period for the proposed
rule, which now runs through March 12, 2021, before issuing a final
rule. All verbal comments or remarks provided on the proposed rule
during the meeting will be recorded and posted to the rulemaking docket
on https://www.regulations.gov.

MaryAnn Tierney,
Acting Deputy Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-02459 Filed 2-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: September 24, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 184)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 48671-48672]
[DOCID:fr24se09-14]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0695; Airspace Docket No. 09-AWP-7]

Proposed Establishment and Modification of Class E Airspace;
Bishop, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E surface airspace and
modify existing Class E airspace at Eastern Sierra Regional Airport,
Bishop, CA. Additional controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate
aircraft using a new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System
(GPS) Standard Instrument Approach Procedure (SIAP) at Eastern Sierra
Regional Airport, Bishop, CA. The FAA is proposing this action to
enhance the safety and management of aircraft operations at Eastern
Sierra Regional Airport, Bishop, CA.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 9, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2009-
0695; Airspace Docket No. 09-AWP-7, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA 2009-0695 and Airspace Docket No. 09-AWP-7) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2009-0695 and Airspace Docket No. 09-AWP-7''. The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://
www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_
amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Area,

Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRM's should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by establishing Class E airspace
designated as surface areas and modifying existing Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Eastern Sierra
Regional Airport, Bishop, CA. Controlled airspace is necessary to
accommodate aircraft using the new RNAV (GPS) SIAP at Eastern Sierra
Regional Airport, Bishop, CA. This action would enhance the safety and
management of aircraft operations at Eastern Sierra Regional Airport,
Bishop, CA.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6002 and
6005, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9T, signed August 27, 2009, and
effective September 15, 2009, which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designation listed in this document will
be published subsequently in this Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation; (1) is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since
this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified that this proposed rule, when
promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes
the authority for the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes additional controlled airspace at Eastern Sierra
Regional Airport, Bishop, CA.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the FAA Order
7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 27,
2009, and effective September 15, 2009, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6002 Class E airspace designated as surface areas.

* * * * *

AWP CA, E2 Bishop, CA [New]

Eastern Sierra Regional, CA
    (Lat. 37[deg]22'23'' N., long. 118[deg]21'49'' W.)

    Within a 4.2-mile radius of Eastern Sierra Regional Airport.
This Class E airspace area is effective during the specific dates
and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The
effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in
the Airport/Facility Directory.
* * * * *

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

AWP CA, E5 Bishop, CA [Modified]

Eastern Sierra Regional, CA
    (Lat. 37[deg]22'23'' N., long. 118[deg]21'49'' W.)
Beatty VORTAC
    (Lat. 36[deg]48'02'' N., long. 116[deg]44'52'' W.)
LIDAT Intersection
    (Lat. 37[deg]25'49'' N., long. 117[deg]16'41'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.7-mile radius of Eastern Sierra Regional Airport and that
airspace within 2.2 miles each side of the Eastern Sierra Regional
Airport 337[deg] bearing extending from the 6.7-mile radius to 27.8
miles northwest of the Eastern Sierra Regional Airport; and that
airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface of the
earth bounded by a line beginning at lat. 38[deg]11'08'' N., long.
118[deg]46'30'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]13'14'' N., long. 118[deg]41'00''
W.; to lat. 38[deg]14'25'' N., long. 118[deg]17'04'' W.; to lat.
38[deg]03'17'' N., long. 118[deg]02'30'' W.; to lat. 37[deg]41'20''
N., long. 118[deg]16'42'' W.; to lat. 37[deg]09'50'' N., long.
118[deg]00'13'' W.; to lat. 37[deg]02'00'' N., long. 118[deg]21'30''
W.; to lat. 38[deg]11'08'' N., long. 118[deg]57'00'' W.; thence to
the point of origin. That airspace extending upward from 12,500 feet
MSL within 4.3 miles each side of a direct course between the
Eastern Sierra Regional Airport and LIDAT Intersection, 36.5 miles
12,500 feet MSL, 10,500 feet MSL LIDAT Intersection; and within 4.3
miles each side of a direct course between Eastern Sierra Regional
Airport and the Beatty VORTAC 69.5 miles 12,500 feet MSL, 10,500
feet MSL Beatty VORTAC.
* * * * *

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on September 18, 2009.
William Buck,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. E9-23105 Filed 9-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P