[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90178-90179]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28759]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR24-31-000.
    Applicants: Rocky Mountain Natural Gas LLC.
    Description: Sec.  284.123 Rate Filing: RMNG Fuel Loss Adjustment
Filing to be effective 11/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 12/21/23.
    Accession Number: 20231221-5295.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/24.

    Docket Numbers: RP24-260-000.
    Applicants: KUSA Inc., LLOG Omega Holdings LLC, LLOG Exploration
Offshore LLC.
    Description: Joint Petition for Limited Waiver of Capacity Release
Regulations, et al. of LLOG Omega Holdings LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 12/21/23.
    Accession Number: 20231221-5225.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/2/24.

    Docket Numbers: RP24-261-000.
    Applicants: NGO Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Filing to be
effective 1/1/2024.
    Filed Date: 12/22/23.
    Accession Number: 20231222-5065.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/24.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211,
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP18-556-004.
    Applicants: Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: Petition to Amend Stipulation and
Agreement.
    Filed Date: 12/21/23.
    Accession Number: 20231221-5232.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 12/28/23.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For

other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call (202)
502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners,
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is
encouraged to contact OPP at<PHONE_NUMBER> or [email protected].

    Dated: December 22, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-28759 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 40 (Monday, March 2, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11101-11106]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02676]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0189; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-181-AD;
Amendment 39-18099; AD 2015-03-03]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A300 series airplanes, Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-
600R series airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes
(collectively called Model A300-600 series airplanes). This AD was
prompted by a report of chafing found on the overflow sensor harness of
the surge tank, and subsequent contact between the electrical wiring
and fuel tank structure. This AD requires a one-time inspection for
chafing of the overflow sensor harness, and repair if necessary. This
AD also requires modification of the sensor harness. We are issuing
this AD to prevent chafing of the harness and subsequent contact
between the electrical wiring and fuel tank structure, which could
result in electrical arcing and a fuel tank explosion and consequent
loss of the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective April 6, 2015.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of April 6,
2015.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0189 or in person at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.

For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0189.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:
425-227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Airbus Model A300
series airplanes, Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R series
airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes (collectively
called Model A300-600 series airplanes). The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on April 8, 2014 (79 FR 19296).
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013-0193, dated August 23, 2013 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus Model A300
series airplanes, Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R series
airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes (collectively
called Model A300-600 series airplanes). The MCAI states:

    During a scheduled maintenance check on an A300 aeroplane,
chafing was found on the surge tank overflow sensor harness. The
harness was found to contact the Magnetic Fuel Level Indicator
(MFLI) canister.
    Prompted by these findings, DGAC [Direction
G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile] France issued [(http://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_1999_404_293.pdf/AD_1999-404-293)] to
require modification of the harness routing in accordance with the
instructions of Airbus SB [service bulletin] A300-28-0058 or SB
A300-28-6020, as applicable to aeroplane model.
    Since that [DGAC] AD was issued, maintenance work on modified
A300-600 aeroplanes revealed some chafing of the harness, creating a
potential contact between the electrical wire and fuel tank
structure. Investigations have shown that although measures were
taken to prevent contact of the harness with the MFLI (through
modification 04489), the installation can be subject to human error.
As the MFLI is integral to the access panel in this location, any
potential contact with the harness (as a result of incorrect
installation) is hidden.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
electrical arcing, possibly resulting in a fuel tank explosion and
loss of the aeroplane. To address this potential unsafe condition,
Airbus issued SB A300-28-0091 for A300 aeroplanes, SB A300-28-6109
for A300-600 aeroplanes, and A300-28-9022 for A300-600ST aeroplanes.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires a one-
time inspection of the harness and, depending on findings,
corrective actions, as well as replacement of angle brackets by
error-proof harness brackets.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0189-0002.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM (79
FR 19296, April 8, 2014) and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Remove AD Reference in Repair Approvals

    United Parcel Service (UPS) asked that we remove the requirement to
include the AD reference in repair approvals, as specified in paragraph
(g)(1) of the proposed AD (79 FR 19296, April 8, 2014), which states
``For a repair to be approved, the repair must specifically refer to
this AD.'' UPS stated the following: ``The proposed wording, being
specific to repairs, eliminates the interpretation that Airbus messages
are acceptable for approving minor deviations (corrective actions)
needed during accomplishment of a mandated Airbus service bulletin.''
UPS added that this will result in an increase in alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) requests.
    We agree with the commenter's request to remove the requirement
that repair approvals specifically refer to this AD, from this AD.
    Since late 2006, we have included a standard paragraph titled
``Airworthy Product'' in all MCAI ADs in which the FAA develops an AD
based on a foreign authority's AD. The MCAI or referenced service
information in an FAA AD often directs the owner/operator to contact
the manufacturer for corrective actions, such as a repair. Briefly, the
Airworthy Product paragraph allowed owners/operators to use corrective
actions provided by the manufacturer if those actions were FAA-
approved. In addition, the paragraph stated that any actions approved
by the State of Design Authority (or its delegated agent) are
considered to be FAA-approved.
    In the NPRM (79 FR 19296, April 8, 2014), we proposed to prevent
the use of repairs that were not specifically developed to correct the
unsafe condition, by requiring that the repair approval provided by the
State of Design Authority or its delegated agent specifically refer to
this FAA AD. This change was intended to clarify the method of
compliance and to provide operators with better visibility of repairs
that are specifically developed and approved to correct the unsafe
condition. In addition, we proposed to change the phrase ``its
delegated agent'' to include ``the Design Approval Holder (DAH) with a
State of Design Authority's design organization approval (DOA)'' to
refer to a DAH authorized to approve required repairs for the AD.
    As stated previously, UPS commented that: ``The proposed wording,
being specific to repairs, eliminates the interpretation that Airbus
messages are acceptable for approving minor deviations (corrective
actions) needed during accomplishment of an AD mandated Airbus service
bulletin.'' This comment has made the FAA aware that some operators
have misunderstood or misinterpreted the Airworthy Product paragraph to
allow the owner/operator to use messages provided by the manufacturer
as approval of deviations during the accomplishment of an AD-mandated
action. The Airworthy Product paragraph does not approve messages or
other information provided by the manufacturer for deviations to the
requirements of the AD-mandated actions. The Airworthy Product
paragraph only addresses the requirement to contact the manufacturer
for corrective actions for the identified unsafe condition and does not
cover deviations from other AD requirements. However, deviations to AD-
required actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17, and anyone may request
the approval for an alternative method of compliance to the AD-required
actions using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    To address this misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the
Airworthy Product paragraph, we have changed that paragraph and
retitled it ``Contacting the Manufacturer.'' This paragraph now
clarifies that for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the actions must be accomplished using a
method approved by the FAA, EASA, or Airbus's EASA DOA.
    The Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph also clarifies that, if
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature. The DOA signature indicates that the data and information
contained in the document are EASA-approved, which is also FAA-
approved. Messages and other information provided by the

manufacturer, that do not contain the DOA-authorized signature approval
are not EASA-approved, unless EASA directly approves the manufacturer's
message or other information.
    This clarification does not remove flexibility previously afforded
by the Airworthy Product paragraph. Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never intended for required actions. This
is also consistent with the recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by identifying those actions in
manufacturers' service instructions that are ``Required for
Compliance'' with ADs. We continue to work with manufacturers to
implement this recommendation. But once we determine that an action is
required, any deviation from the requirement must be approved as an
AMOC.
    Commenters to an NPRM having Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-101-AD
(78 FR 78285, December 26, 2013) pointed out that in many cases the
foreign manufacturer's service bulletin and the foreign authority's
MCAI may have been issued some time before the FAA AD. Therefore, the
DOA may have provided U.S. operators with an approved repair, developed
with full awareness of the unsafe condition, before the FAA AD is
issued. Under these circumstances, to comply with the FAA AD, the
operator would be required to go back to the manufacturer's DOA and
obtain a new approval document, adding time and expense to the
compliance process with no safety benefit.
    Based on these comments, we removed the requirement from this AD
that the DAH-provided repair specifically refer to this AD. Before
adopting such a requirement in the future, the FAA will coordinate with
affected DAHs and verify they are prepared to implement means to ensure
that their repair approvals consider the unsafe condition addressed in
an AD. Any such requirements will be adopted through the normal AD
rulemaking process, including notice-and-comment procedures, when
appropriate.
    We also have decided not to include a generic reference to either
the ``delegated agent'' or the ``DAH with State of Design Authority
design organization approval,'' but instead we have provided the
specific delegation approval granted by the State of Design Authority
for the DAH.

Request To Extend the Compliance Time

    UPS asked that we extend the compliance time specified in paragraph
(g) of the proposed AD (79 FR 19296, April 8, 2014) from 30 to 36
months. UPS stated that it expects to accomplish the inspection during
its existing C-check interval, which is 30 months. UPS added that in
order to perform the inspection and repair at its major maintenance
facility during C-checks, it requires an additional 6 months to allow
for planning, preparation, and prototyping of the service information.
UPS noted that this additional time is for the prototyping effort
necessary when a project is initiated; UPS has determined that service
information is often revised during accomplishment of the required
actions, which makes it difficult to maintain regular maintenance
schedules. Therefore, UPS must schedule special visit check lines for
accomplishing the actions.
    We do not agree with the commenter's request to extend the
compliance time. In developing an appropriate compliance time for this
action, we considered the safety implications, parts availability, and
normal maintenance schedules for the timely accomplishment of the
inspection and subsequent modification. In consideration of these
items, as well as the possibility of chafing of the overflow sensor
harness, we have determined that a 30-month compliance time will ensure
an acceptable level of safety and allow the modification to be done
during scheduled maintenance intervals for most affected operators.
However, under the provisions of paragraph (j)(1) of this AD, we will
consider requests for approval of an extension of the compliance time
if sufficient data are submitted to substantiate that the new
compliance time would provide an acceptable level of safety. We have
not changed this AD in this regard.

Request To Include Another Source of Service Information

    FedEx Express asked that we allow the use of UTC Aerospace Systems
Service Bulletin V-1577 for accomplishing the actions in the NPRM (79
FR 19296, April 8, 2014). FedEx Express stated that it operates 71
Airbus Model A300-600 series airplanes, and 65 of those airplanes have
had the in-tank fuel quantity system modified by a certain supplemental
type certificate (STC), which means Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-
6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013 (referred to as the
appropriate source of service information for accomplishing the
actions), cannot be used to accomplish the proposed actions. However,
FedEx Express noted that six of its airplanes have the production in-
tank fuel quantity system installed, and the referenced service
information can be used for those airplanes. FedEx Express stated that
the UTC Aerospace Systems service bulletin has not been issued yet;
however, after issuance it should be included in the NPRM as a source
of service information for accomplishing the proposed actions in order
to mitigate the unsafe condition.
    We partially agree with the commenter. We agree that airplanes that
have had the in-tank fuel quantity system modified by STC ST00092BO
(http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/D41C5AE8E46B4901862574900069E004?OpenDocument&Highlight=st00092bo)
cannot accomplish the actions proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 19296, April
8, 2014) by using Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision 01,
dated December 20, 2013. Since the issuance of the NPRM, UTC Aerospace
Systems has issued service bulletin 300723-28-03 (V-1577), dated
October 10, 2014, to address the unsafe condition for airplanes that
have been modified by supplemental type certificate ST00092BO.
    We do not agree to revise this AD to require UTC Aerospace Systems
Service Bulletin 300723-28-03 (V-1577), dated October 10, 2014.
Instead, we are considering separate rulemaking to require the
procedures and compliance time specified in UTC Aerospace Systems
Service Bulletin 300723-28-03 (V-1577), dated October 10, 2014, for
airplanes modified by STC ST00092BO. Therefore, we have revised
paragraph (c) of this AD by removing airplanes modified by STC
ST00092BO from the applicability of this AD.

Request To Include Revised Service Information

    FedEx Express asked that Revision 02 of Airbus Service Bulletin
A300-28-6109 be included for accomplishing the actions in the NPRM (79
FR 19296, April 8, 2014) before the final rule is issued. FedEx Express
stated that it reviewed Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision
01, dated December 20, 2013, and submitted its findings to Airbus for
incorporation into upcoming Revision 02 before issuance. FedEx Express
added that its intent in doing so was to prevent future requests for
AMOCs to the FAA.
    We disagree with the commenter's request to include Revision 02 of
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109. We are aware that Airbus is
considering

revising Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated
December 20, 2013, to incorporate feedback received from FedEx Express
in the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. We will
consider approving Revision 02 of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109
as an AMOC to the actions specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this
AD, once this service bulletin is released. However, we find that
delaying this AD action would be inappropriate in light of the urgency
of the identified unsafe condition. Therefore, no change has been made
to this AD in this regard.

Request To Clarify the ``Required for Compliance'' Instructions

    FedEx Express asked for clarification as to whether the Required
for Compliance (RC) note identified in the Accomplishment Instructions
of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December
20, 2013, is applicable to the actions specified in the NPRM (79 FR
19296, April 8, 2014) and EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013-0193, dated
August 23, 2013.
    We acknowledge the commenter's concern and provide the following
clarification:
    The FAA worked in conjunction with industry, under the
Airworthiness Directives Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee
(ARC), to enhance the AD system. One enhancement is a new process for
annotating which steps in the service information are ``required for
compliance'' with an AD. Differentiating these steps from other tasks
in the service information is expected to improve an owner's and
operator's understanding of AD requirements and help provide consistent
judgment in AD compliance. In response to the AD Implementation ARC,
the FAA released AC 20-176, Revision A, dated June 16, 2014, (http://
rgl.avs.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/
0/a78cc91a47b192278625796b0075f419/$FILE/AC%2020-176.pdf); and Order
8110.117 (http://rgl.avs.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/
rgOrders.nsf/0/984bb9eb07cdd86986257a7f0070744c/$FILE/
Order%208110.117.pdf), which include the concept of RC. The FAA has
begun implementing this concept in ADs when we receive service
information containing RC steps. Therefore, the RC note does apply to
the actions required by this AD when using Airbus Service Bulletin
A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013, to accomplish the
required actions. We do not have information concerning how EASA
implements the RC concept in its ADs.
    We split paragraph (j)(1) and redesignated the content as
paragraphs (j)(1) and (j)(1)(i) of this AD, and added paragraph
(j)(1)(ii) to this AD to reflect information concerning the RC concept
and to explain when it is necessary to request approval of an AMOC.

Clarification of Inspection Type

    Paragraph (g) of this AD has been revised to clarify the inspection
type as a one-time general visual inspection.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (79 FR 19296, April 8, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 19296, April 8, 2014).
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletins A300-28-0091, dated
March 5, 2013; and A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013.
This service information describes procedures for a one-time inspection
for chafing of the overflow sensor harness, and contacting the
manufacturer for repair instructions. This service information also
describes modification of the sensor harness. This service information
is reasonably available; see ADDRESSES for ways to access this service
information.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 123 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We also estimate that it takes about 3 work-hours per product to
comply with the inspection required by this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this inspection on U.S. operators to be $31,365, or $255 per product.
    We estimate that it takes about 12 work-hours per product to comply
with the modification requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Required parts cost about $500 per product. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of this modification on U.S.
operators to be $186,960, or $1,520 per product.
    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition repairs specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0189; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The

street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2015-03-03 Airbus: Amendment 39-18099. Docket No. FAA-2014-0189;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-181-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective April 6, 2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes specified in paragraphs
(c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), (c)(4), and (c)(5) of this AD, certificated
in any category, all manufacturer serial numbers; except for
airplanes modified by supplemental type certificate ST00092BO
(http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/D41C5AE8E46B4901862574900069E004?OpenDocument&Highlight=st00092bo).
    (1) Model A300 B2-1A, B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-203, B4-2C, B4-103, and
B4-203 airplanes.
    (2) Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, and B4-622 airplanes.
    (3) Model A300 B4-605R and B4-622R airplanes.
    (4) Model A300 F4-605R and F4-622R airplanes.
    (5) Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report of chafing found on the
overflow sensor harness of the surge tank, and subsequent contact
between the electrical wiring and fuel tank structure. We are
issuing this AD to prevent chafing of the harness and subsequent
contact between the electrical wiring and fuel tank structure, which
could result in electrical arcing and a fuel tank explosion and
consequent loss of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) One-Time Inspection and Repair

    Within 30 months after the effective date of this AD: Perform a
one-time general visual inspection for chafing of the outer tank
sensor harness between ribs 26 and 27, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-0091,
dated March 5, 2013 (for Model A300 series airplanes); or Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013
(for Model A300-600 series airplanes);
    (1) If any previous repairs are identified, or if braid and wire
insulation is found damaged with the conductor exposed during the
inspection required by the introductory text of paragraph (g) of
this AD: Before further flight, repair using a method approved by
the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or
Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).
    (2) If the braid and wire insulation is found damaged without
the conductor exposed during the inspection required by the
introductory text of paragraph (g) of this AD: Before further
flight, repair, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-0091, dated March 5, 2013 (for
Model A300 series airplanes); or Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-
6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013 (for Model A300-600
series airplanes).

(h) Modification

    (1) For airplanes on which no damage was found during the
inspection required by the introductory text of paragraph (g) of
this AD: Before further flight, install modified and error-proof
angle brackets to stringer 15 between ribs 26 and 27 of the outer
tank sensor harness, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-0091, dated March 5,
2013 (for Model A300 series airplanes); or Airbus Service Bulletin
A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013 (for Model A300-
600 series airplanes).
    (2) For airplanes on which any damage was found during the
inspection required by the introductory text of paragraph (g) of
this AD, and the applicable repair required by paragraph (g)(1) or
(g)(2) of this AD has been done: Before further flight, install
modified and error-proof angle brackets to stringer 15 between ribs
26 and 27 of the outer tank sensor harness, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-0091,
dated March 5, 2013 (for Model A300 series airplanes); or Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013
(for Model A300-600 series airplanes).

(i) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin
A300-28-6109, dated March 5, 2013, which is not incorporated by
reference in this AD.

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information may be
emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (i) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
    (ii) Except as required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD: If the
service information contains procedures or tests that are identified
as RC (Required for Compliance), those procedures and tests must be
done to comply with this AD; any procedures and tests that are not
identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and tests that
are not identified as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods
in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection program
without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and
tests identified as RC can be done and the airplane can be put back
in a serviceable condition. Any substitutions or changes to
procedures or tests identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA;
or Airbus's EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.

(k) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013-0193, dated August 23,
2013, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0189-0002.
    (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD.

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-0091, dated March 5, 2013.
    (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated
December 20, 2013.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 2, 2015.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-02676 Filed 2-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39739-39740]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14313]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-78051; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2016-078]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Fees Assessed Under Rule 7015(h)

June 13, 2016.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 31, 2016, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') a proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    Nasdaq is proposing changes to amend the fees assessed under Nasdaq
Rule 7015(h).
    The changes are being filed for immediate effectiveness and will
become operative June 1, 2016.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at
nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at Nasdaq's principal office, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
    The text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed new
language is in italics; proposed deletions are in brackets.

* * * * *

7015. Access Services

    The charges under this rule are assessed by Nasdaq for
connectivity to the following systems operated by NASDAQ or FINRA:
The Nasdaq Market Center, FINRA Trade Reporting and Compliance
Engine (TRACE), the FINRA/NASDAQ Trade Reporting Facility, FINRA's
OTCBB Service, and the FINRA OTC Reporting Facility (ORF). The
following fees are not applicable to the NASDAQ Options Market LLC.
For related options fees for Access Services refer to Chapter XV,
Section 3 of the Options Rules.
    (a)-(g) No change.

(h) VTE Terminal Fees

     Each ID is subject to a minimum commission fee of $500
[250] per month unless it executes a minimum of 100,000 shares.
     Each ID receiving market data is subject to pass-
through fees for use of these services. Pricing for these services
is determined by the exchanges and/or market center.
     Each ID that is given web access is subject to a $500
[250] monthly fee.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Nasdaq is proposing to increase the fees assessed members under
Rule 7015(h) for use of VTE terminals. A VTE terminal is a basic front-
end user interface used by Nasdaq members to connect to, and enter
orders in, The Nasdaq Market Center. Members using VTE terminals pay
the exchanges and market centers separately for data feeds and services
provided by Nasdaq, other exchanges or market centers through VTE. Such
fees are filed with the SEC and separately assessed by the exchanges
and market centers at the same rate irrespective of the method of
accessing the data feeds.
    These data feeds provide information that is necessary for users to
enter orders through VTE. The two fees assessed under Rule 7015(h)
relate to optional web access and commissions.
    Rule 7015(h) currently assesses monthly a minimum commission fee of
$250 per ID for users executing orders totaling less than 100,000
shares per month, and a web access fee of $250 per ID. Nasdaq last
increased fees assessed under Rule 7015(h) in 2013 when it raised the
fee for access to the terminal via the web from $125 monthly to $250
monthly, and raised the minimum commission fee for users executing
orders totaling less than 100,000 shares per month from $125 monthly to
$250 monthly.\3\ In light of increasing costs, Nasdaq is proposing to
increase the fee for access to the terminal via the web from $250
monthly to $500 monthly, and increase the minimum commission fee for
users executing orders totaling less than 100,000 shares per month from
$250 monthly to $500 monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65014 (August 2, 2011),
76 FR 48189 (August 8, 2011) (SR-NASDAQ-2011-101).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq notes that web connectivity is one option available to
Nasdaq users for accessing the VTE terminal. Another option is access
through extranet connectivity, where a user contracts directly with a
third-party extranet provider and pays fees to that provider. With
respect to minimum commission fees, members that execute total orders
above the 100,000 share threshold will continue to not be assessed a
commission fee.
    Based on Nasdaq operation of the VTE since it was acquired from
INET, Nasdaq believes that the pricing changes are warranted in order
to appropriately balance the decreasing demand for the product with
increasing platform, overhead, and technology infrastructure costs.
Given that VTE is based on outdated technology and that members have
other options for connecting to, and entering orders in, The Nasdaq
Market Center, Nasdaq plans to phase out the service in its entirety on
or before January 31, 2017.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\4\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) of the Act,\5\ in particular. The Exchange believes it is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act because it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among
members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system
which the Exchange operates or controls. All similarly situated members
are subject to the same fee structure, and access to this Nasdaq
service is offered on fair and non-discriminatory terms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq has not increased the fees assessed under Rule 7015(h) since
2013 despite incurring a substantial decrease in subscribership,
resulting in higher per-subscription costs as fixed costs are spread
among fewer users. Moreover, during this time Nasdaq has also
experienced increased costs associated with ongoing support of the VTE
platform, which include platform, overhead and technology
infrastructure costs. In order to continue to offer this service,
Nasdaq must increase the subscriber fees as proposed to cover the
overall general increase in cost to support the service, and to cover
the

increased cost resulting from a smaller subscriber base.
    The proposed fees realign the balance of the costs discussed above
to the fees received for the service so that it is similar to the ratio
at the time of the last fee increase. Nasdaq notes that it operates in
a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily
favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to
be excessive. Use of VTE terminals is entirely optional and members can
avail themselves of numerous other means of accessing The Nasdaq Market
Center. Members are not obligated to subscribe to VTE terminals and may
cancel an existing subscription at any time, with the obligation to pay
only for full the monthly fee for the month canceled. As noted above,
Nasdaq plans to ultimately phase out the service in 2017 in light of
declining subscribership, the age of the technology, and because
members have other options for connecting to, and entering orders in,
The Nasdaq Market Center. As such, the Exchange believes that the
proposed fees are reasonable.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. The proposed fees
merely allow Nasdaq to recapture the increasing platform, overhead and
technology infrastructure costs it incurs in support of the service,
which are magnified on a per subscription basis given a declining
subscriber base. The fees are applied uniformly among subscribing
member firms, which are not compelled to subscribe to the service and
may access the information provided through other means. For these
reasons, any burden arising from the fees is necessary in the interest
of promoting the equitable allocation of a reasonable fee.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\6\ At any time within 60 days of the filing
of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily
suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2016-078 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2016-078. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2016-078, and should
be submitted on or before July 8, 2016.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-14313 Filed 6-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22668-22669]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09961]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2007-D-0369]

Product-Specific Guidances; Draft and Revised Draft Guidances for
Industry; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of additional draft and revised draft product-specific
guidances. The guidances provide product-specific recommendations on,
among other things, the design of bioequivalence (BE) studies to
support abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs). In the Federal
Register of June 11, 2010, FDA announced the availability of a guidance
for industry entitled ``Bioequivalence Recommendations for Specific
Products'' that explained the process that would be used to make
product-specific guidances available to the public on FDA's Web site.
The guidances identified in this notice were developed using the
process described in that guidance.

DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment(s) on
these draft guidances before it begins work on the final version of
such guidances, submit either electronic or written comments on the
draft guidance by July 17, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2007-D-0369 for ``Product-Specific Guidances; Draft and Revised
Draft Guidances for Industry.'' Received comments will be placed in the
docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidances to
the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave.,
Hillandale Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one
self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance documents.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Xiaoqiu Tang, Center for Drug

Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 75, Rm. 4730, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-5850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In the Federal Register of June 11, 2010 (75 FR 33311), FDA
announced the availability of a guidance for industry entitled
``Bioequivalence Recommendations for Specific Products'' that explained
the process that would be used to make product-specific guidances
available to the public on FDA's Web site at https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm.
    As described in that guidance, FDA adopted this process as a means
to develop and disseminate product-specific guidances and provide a
meaningful opportunity for the public to consider and comment on those
guidances. Under that process, draft guidances are posted on FDA's Web
site and announced periodically in the Federal Register. The public is
encouraged to submit comments on those recommendations within 60 days
of their announcement in the Federal Register. FDA considers any
comments received and either publishes final guidances or publishes
revised draft guidances for comment. Guidances were last announced in
the Federal Register on December 23, 2016 (81 FR 94394). This notice
announces draft product-specific guidances, either new or revised, that
are posted on FDA's Web site.

II. Drug Products for Which New Draft Product-Specific Guidances are
Available

    FDA is announcing the availability of a new draft product-specific
guidances for industry for drug products containing the following
active ingredients:

     Table 1--New Draft Product-Specific Guidances for Drug Products
------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acetylcysteine
Amphetamine
Aprepitant
Azelastine hydrochloride
Bisacodyl; polyethylene glycol 3350; potassium chloride; sodium
 bicarbonate; sodium chloride
Carbidopa; levodopa
Chlordiazepoxide hydrochloride; Clidinium bromide
Clonazepam
Edoxaban tosylate
Gentamicin sulfate
Hydrocortisone
Hydrocortisone butyrate
Linagliptin; Metformin hydrochloride
Lorcaserin hydrochloride
Methylnaltrexone bromide
Nitroglycerin
Nystatin; Triamcinolone acetonide (multiple reference listed drugs)
Oxymetazoline hydrochloride; Tetracaine hydrochloride
Sofosbuvir; Velpatasvir
Venetoclax
------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Drug Products for Which Revised Draft Product-Specific Guidances
are Available

    FDA is announcing the availability of revised draft product-
specific guidances for industry for drug products containing the
following active ingredients:

   Table 2--Revised Draft Product-Specific Guidances for Drug Products
------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acamprosate calcium
Apixaban
Bexarotene
Calcium acetate (multiple reference listed drugs)
Deferiprone
Dolutegravir sodium
Emtricitabine; Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
Fingolimod
Lanthanum carbonate
Nevirapine
Phenytoin (multiple reference listed drugs)
Propafenone hydrochloride
Trospium chloride (multiple reference listed drugs)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a complete history of previously published Federal Register
notices related to product-specific guidances, go to https://www.regulations.gov and enter Docket No. FDA-2007-D-0369.
    These draft guidances are being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). These draft guidances,
when finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on, among
other things, the product-specific design of BE studies to support
ANDAs. They do not establish any rights for any person and are not
binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it
satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.

IV. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the draft guidances
at either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or
https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: May 11, 2017.
Anna K. Abram,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning, Legislation, and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2017-09961 Filed 5-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: September 28, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 186)]
[Notices]
[Page 49370]
[DOCID:fr28se09-47]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

September 21, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:
    Docket Numbers: RP09-1043-000
    Applicants: Equitrans, LP
    Description: Equitrans submits Letter of transmittal with
Appendices A through D.
    Filed Date: 09/14/2009
    Accession Number: 20090915-0064
    Comment Date: 5:00 pm Eastern Time on Monday, September 28, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-1043-001
    Applicants: Equitrans, LP
    Description: Equitrans, LP submits non-conforming service
agreements.
    Filed Date: 09/16/2009
    Accession Number: 20090917-0001
    Comment Date: 5:00 pm Eastern Time on Monday, September 28, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-1048-000
    Applicants: Discovery Gas Transmission LLC,
    Description: Discovery Gas Transmission LLC submits Seventeenth
Revised Sheet No 20 to FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No 1, to be
effective 10/1/09.
    Filed Date: 09/17/2009
    Accession Number: 20090917-0075
    Comment Date: 5:00 pm Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 29, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-1049-000
    Applicants: Black Marlin Pipeline Company
    Description: Black Marlin Pipeline Company submits Eighteenth
Revised Sheet No 4 to FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No 1, to be
effective 10/1/09.
    Filed Date: 09/17/2009
    Accession Number: 20090917-0074
    Comment Date: 5:00 pm Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 29, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-1050-000
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Trans. LLC
    Description: Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission, LLC submits
Second Revised Sheet 28 et al to FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume
1-A, to be effective 10/19/09.
    Filed Date: 09/18/2009
    Accession Number: 20090918-0109
    Comment Date: 5:00 pm Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 30,
2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-1051-000
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC
    Description: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC submits Fifth Revised
Sheet 99A to FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume 1 to be effective 9/
18/09.
    Filed Date: 09/18/2009
    Accession Number: 20090918-0110
    Comment Date: 5:00 pm Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 30,
2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-1052-000
    Applicants: Dominion Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Dominion Transmission, Inc. Refund Report.
    Filed Date: 09/18/2009
    Accession Number: 20090918-5068
    Comment Date: 5:00 pm Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 30,
2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-1053-000
    Applicants: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company
    Description: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company submits
FERC Gas Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume 1 to be effective 11/1/09.
    Filed Date: 09/18/2009
    Accession Number: 20090918-0112
    Comment Date: 5:00 pm Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 30,
2009.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-23350 Filed 9-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 239 (Friday, December 11, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80088-80089]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27264]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER21-575-000]

Lanyard Power Marketing, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced Lanyard Power
Marketing, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is December 28, 2020.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the

last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. At
this time, the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's
Public Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National
Emergency concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued
by the President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call
toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 7, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-27264 Filed 12-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P