[Federal Register: December 28, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 249)]
[Notices]
[Page 78247-78249]
[DOCID:fr28de06-129]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54970; File No. SR-NYSE-2006-114]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to
Amend Exchange Rule 123A.30 to Eliminate the Two Tick Rule to Allow for
the Execution of CAP-DI Orders at Consecutive Destabilizing Prices
Without Floor Official Approval

December 19, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 14, 2006, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the Exchange.
The Exchange filed the proposed rule change as a ``non-controversial''
rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to amend Exchange Rule 123A.30 to allow a
CAP-DI order to be executed at consecutive destabilizing prices without
Floor Official approval.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at NYSE, the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Exchange Rules 13 and 123A.30 describe a type of percentage order
\5\ called a ``convert and parity, destabilizing, immediate-or-cancel''
(CAP-DI) order and the manner in which such orders are elected or
converted and executed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Percentage orders are limited price orders to buy or sell a
certain volume of the specified security after a trade occurs at or
within the order's limit. As such, all percentage orders, including
CAP-DI orders, are referred to as ``go along orders'' because they
generally want to trade at prices established by other market
participants and do not want to initiate a significant price change
or lag behind the market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CAP-DI orders are ``elected'' into limit orders when a trade on the
Exchange occurs at or within a CAP-DI order's limit price. The size and
price of such limit order is the same as the electing trade. The
election and execution of CAP-DI orders is automatic.
    CAP-DI orders may also be ``converted'' into limit orders to trade
with the NYSE bid and offer or to establish a new NYSE best bid or
offer as prescribed by Rule 123A.30. When first adopted, CAP-DI orders
were converted by specialists in accordance with the instructions of
the Floor broker who entered the order. Today, CAP-DI orders are
automatically converted and trade in certain situations--when the
specialist trades for its dealer account in an automatic execution.\6\
In that situation, CAP-DI orders that have been entered and are capable
of trading at that price are automatically converted and trade along
with the specialist.\7\ This process benefits customers by ensuring
that CAP-DI orders are executed in accordance with their expectations--
i.e. that they participate in NYSE trades at or within their limit and
thereby do not lag behind the market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ This occurs either because the specialist has
algorithmically generated a trading message or is part of a quote
that is automatically executed.
    \7\ By its terms (convert and parity), specialists and CAP-DI
orders trade on parity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The ``D'' designation on CAP-DI orders stands for ``destabilizing''
and allows the order to be converted to participate in stabilizing or
destabilizing transactions \8\ or to bid (offer) in a destabilizing
manner.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ A ``destabilizing'' trade is a trade that follows the
direction of the market as, for example, a purchase on a plus tick
or a sale on a minus tick. A stabilizing trade is one that counters
the direction of the market as, for example, a purchase on a minus
tick or a sale on a plus tick.
    \9\ Rule 123A.30 sets forth certain size and maximum price
restrictions on CAP-DI conversions. The Exchange is not proposing to
amend these requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The ``I'' designation of the CAP-DI order stands for ``immediate
execution or cancel'' and allows for the cancellation of any converted
portion of the order that is not executed immediately at the price of
the electing transaction or better. Any portion that is not immediately
executed reverts to its status as a CAP-DI order, eligible for
subsequent election or conversion and execution.
    CAP-DI orders are subject to certain restrictions on conversions to
trade and quote that were intended to minimize the specialist's ability
to move the price direction of a security through the conversion of the
CAP-DI orders.\10\ Thus, Exchange Rule 123A.30 provides that CAP-DI
orders may not be converted ``at consecutively higher or lower prices
such that consecutive up or down ticks (as the case may be), follow one
another in rapid succession, unless [the specialist] obtains the prior

approval of a Floor Governor, Senior Floor Official, or Executive Floor
Official'' (hereinafter, ``two tick rule'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 24505 (May 22,
1987), 52 FR 20484 (June 1, 1987) (SR-NYSE-85-1) (approving
amendment to Rule 123A.30 permitting conversion of percentage orders
on destabilizing ticks under certain restrictions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    However, as a result of the automatic conversion and execution
process described above, it is possible for CAP-DI orders to trade at
prices inconsistent with the two tick rule, given the inability to
pause the automatic execution of these orders to allow for compliance
with a slow, manual Floor Official approval process.
    In addition, the two tick rule was adopted at a time when the
Exchange traded in ``eighths'' or increments of twelve and a half
cents.\11\ As a result, a two tick movement equaled a price change of
twenty-five cents. Today, after the move to decimal pricing, stocks
trade in one cent increments; a two-tick movement, therefore, is only
two cents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ While other sections of the rule were amended to reflect
decimal pricing, this portion was not. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 43230 (August 30, 2000), 65 FR 54589 (September 8, 2000)
(SR-NYSE-00-22).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, the Exchange seeks to remove the two tick rule and the
related requirement for Floor Official approval. The automatic
conversion and execution of CAP-DI orders when the specialist trades
provides an experience for the customer that is consistent with his or
her trading expectations. It also limits the risk to the CAP-DI order
of missing the market that is inherent with a manual conversion and
execution process in an automatic execution environment. Further, it
eliminates the possibility that specialists' permissible trading occurs
at prices better than that received by a customer order, when such
order was marketable at the price the specialist received.
    Further, while the two tick rule made sense when minimum price
variations were wide and each tick change covered multiple cents, it is
overly restrictive in today's decimalized market. Similarly, the
conversion limitation was consistent with specialist stabilization
rules that precluded certain proprietary trading without Floor Official
approval. Changes in these rules support this proposal.\12\ Lastly,
Rule 123A.30 will continue to limit the price at which converted shares
can participate in a destabilizing transaction.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 54860 (December
1, 2006) 71 FR 71221 (December 8, 2006) (NYSE-2006-76).
    \13\ Rule 123A.30 allows conversions to effect destabilizing
trades where the transaction for which the CAP-DI order is being
converted is for: (1) less than 10,000 shares or an amount of stock
having a market value less than $500,000, and the price at which the
converted order is to be executed is no more than $0.10 away from
the last sale price, or (2) 10,000 shares or more or valued at
$500,000 or more, and the price at which the trade is to take place
is no more than $0.25 from the last sale. Telephone Conversation
between Deanna Logan, Director, Office of the General Counsel, NYSE,
and Cyndi N. Rodriguez, Special Counsel, Division of Market
Regulation, Commission, on December 19, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act in general,\14\ and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act in particular,\15\ in that it
is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. The proposed rule change also is
designed to support the principles of Section 11A(a)(1) of the Act in
that it seeks to assure economically efficient execution of securities
transactions.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed

    Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others The
Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \17\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally may
not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of filing.\19\
However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \20\ permits the Commission to designate
a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The Exchange has requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative delay to allow the Exchange to
immediately implement the proposed rule change. The Exchange believes
that waiver of the 30-day delay is appropriate because the proposed
rule change seeks to assure the economically efficient execution of
securities transactions through the automatic conversion and execution
of CAP-DI orders when the specialist trades.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) under the Act, the
Exchange is also required to give the Commission written notice of
its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five
business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange provided the Commission with written notice of its intent
to file this proposed rule change at least five days prior to the
date of filing.
    \20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest
because it would allow the Exchange to immediately eliminate the two
tick rule so that CAP-DI orders can be converted to trade along with
the specialist. For these reasons, the Commission designates the
proposal to be effective and operative upon filing with the
Commission.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such proposed rule change
if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NYSE-2006-114 on the subject line.

Paper Comments:

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission,

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2006-114. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml

). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the
Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
NYSE. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-

    NYSE-2006-114 and should be submitted on or before January 18, 2007.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant
to delegated authority.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-22196 Filed 12-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 35 (Thursday, February 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11449-11450]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03469]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9959-55-OA]

Notification of a Public Meeting of the Clean Air Scientific
Advisory Committee (CASAC) Sulfur Oxides Panel

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office announces a
public meeting of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)
Sulfur Oxides Panel to peer review EPA's Integrated Science Assessment
(ISA) for Sulfur Oxides--Health Criteria (Second External Review
Draft--December 2016) and Review of the Primary National Ambient Air
Quality Standards for Sulfur Dioxide: Risk and Exposure Assessment
Planning Document (External Review Draft).

DATES: The CASAC Sulfur Oxides Panel meeting will be held on Monday,
March 20, 2017, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) and Tuesday,
March 21, 2017, from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. (Eastern Time).

ADDRESSES: Location: The public meeting will be held at the Residence
Inn Arlington Capital View, 2850 South Potomac Avenue, Arlington,
Virginia 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any member of the public wishing to
obtain information concerning the public meeting may contact Mr. Aaron
Yeow, Designated Federal Officer (DFO), EPA Science Advisory Board
Staff Office (1400R), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460; by telephone at (202)
564-2050 or at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>General information about the CASAC,
as well as any updates concerning the meetings announced in this
notice, may be found on the CASAC Web page at http://www.epa.gov/casac.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CASAC was established pursuant to the
Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977, codified at 42 U.S.C.
7409(d)(2), to review air quality criteria and National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) and recommend any new NAAQS and revisions of
existing criteria and NAAQS as may be appropriate. The CASAC is a
Federal Advisory Committee chartered under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C., App. 2. Section 109(d)(1) of the CAA
requires that the Agency periodically review and revise, as
appropriate, the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six
``criteria'' air pollutants, including sulfur oxides. EPA is currently
reviewing the primary (health-based) NAAQS for sulfur dioxide
(SO2), as an indicator for health effects caused by the
presence of sulfur oxides in the ambient air.
    Pursuant to FACA and EPA policy, notice is hereby given that the
CASAC Sulfur Oxides Panel will hold a public face-to-face meeting to
review EPA's Integrated Science Assessment for Sulfur Oxides--Health
Criteria (Second External Review Draft--December 2016) and Review of
the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Dioxide:
Risk and Exposure Assessment Planning Document (External Review Draft).
The CASAC Sulfur Oxides Panel and CASAC will comply with the provisions
of FACA and all appropriate SAB Staff Office procedural policies.
    Technical Contacts: Any technical questions concerning the
Integrated Science Assessment for Sulfur Oxides--Health Criteria
(Second External Review Draft--December 2016) should be directed to Dr.
Tom Long (long.tom@epa.gov), EPA Office of Research and Development.
Any technical questions concerning the Review of the Primary National
Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Dioxide: Risk and Exposure
Assessment Planning Document (External Review Draft) should be directed
to Dr. Stephen Graham<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and Dr. Nicole Hagan
(hagan.nicole@epa.gov), EPA Office of Air and Radiation.
    Availability of Meeting Materials: Prior to the meeting, the review
documents, agenda and other materials will be available on the CASAC
Web page at http://www.epa.gov/casac/.
    Procedures for Providing Public Input: Public comment for
consideration by EPA's federal advisory committees and panels has a
different purpose from public comment provided to EPA program offices.
Therefore, the process for submitting comments to a federal advisory
committee is different from the process used to submit comments to an
EPA program office.
    Federal advisory committees and panels, including scientific
advisory committees, provide independent advice to EPA. Members of the
public can submit relevant comments on the topic of this advisory
activity, including the charge to the panel and the EPA review
documents, and/or the group conducting the activity, for the CASAC to
consider as it develops advice for EPA. Input from the public to the
CASAC will have the most impact if it provides specific scientific or
technical information or analysis for CASAC panels to consider or if it
relates to the clarity or accuracy of the technical information.
Members of the public wishing to provide comment should follow the
instructions below to submit comments.
    Oral Statements: In general, individuals or groups requesting an
oral presentation at a public meeting will be limited to five minutes.
Each person making an oral statement should consider providing written
comments as well as their oral statement so that the points presented
orally can be expanded upon in writing. Interested parties should
contact Mr. Aaron Yeow, DFO, in writing (preferably via email) at the
contact information noted above by March 13, 2017, to be placed on the
list of public speakers.
    Written Statements: Written statements will be accepted throughout
the advisory process; however, for timely consideration by CASAC
members, statements should be supplied to the DFO (preferably via

email) at the contact information noted above by March 13, 2017. It is
the SAB Staff Office general policy to post written comments on the Web
page for the advisory meeting or teleconference. Submitters are
requested to provide an unsigned version of each document because the
SAB Staff Office does not publish documents with signatures on its Web
sites. Members of the public should be aware that their personal
contact information, if included in any written comments, may be posted
to the CASAC Web site. Copyrighted material will not be posted without
explicit permission of the copyright holder.
    Accessibility: For information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities, please contact Mr. Aaron Yeow at (202)
564-2050 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>To request accommodation of a
disability, please contact Mr. Yeow preferably at least ten days prior
to each meeting to give EPA as much time as possible to process your
request.

    Dated: February 13, 2017.
Khanna Johnston,
Acting Deputy Director, EPA Science Advisory Staff Office.
[FR Doc. 2017-03469 Filed 2-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 210 (Monday, October 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67164-67165]
[FR Doc No: 2011-27997]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC12-10-000.
    Applicants: Michigan Electric Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: Application for approval of acquisition of
transmission assets pursuant to section 203 of Michigan Electric
Transmission Company, LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/20/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111020-5061.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 10, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: EC12-11-000.
    Applicants: Michigan Electric Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: Application for approval of acquisition of
transmission assets pursuant to Section 203 of Michigan Electric
Transmission Company, LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/20/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111020-5062.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 10, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: EC12-12-000.
    Applicants: ITC Midwest LLC.
    Description: Application of ITC Midwest LLC for approval of
acquisition of transmission assets pursuant to Section 203.
    Filed Date: 10/20/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111020-5063.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 10, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER07-771-005.
    Applicants: Louisville Gas and Electric Company, Kentucky Utilities
Company.
    Description: Annual Schedule 2 True-Up Filing of Louisville Gas and
Electric Co./Kentucky Utilities Co.
    Filed Date: 10/20/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111020-5108.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 10, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2124-001; ER10-2125-001; ER10-2127-001; ER10-
2128-001; ER10-2129-001; ER10-2130-001; ER10-2131-002 ER10-2132-001;
ER10-2133-002; ER10-2134-001; ER10-2135-001; ER10-2136-001; ER10-2137-

002; ER10-2138-002; ER10-2139-002; ER10-2140-002; ER10-2141-002; ER10-
2764-001.
    Applicants: Forward Energy LLC, Sheldon Energy LLC, Invenergy
Cannon Falls LLC, Spindle Hill Energy LLC, Spring Canyon Energy LLC,
Grays Harbor Energy LLC, Grand Ridge Energy LLC, Willow Creek Energy
LLC, Hardee Power Partners Limited, Judith Gap Energy LLC, Invenergy TN
LLC, Wolverine Creek Energy LLC, Grand Ridge Energy II LLC, Grand Ridge
Energy III LLC, Grand Ridge Energy IV LLC, Grand Ridge Energy V LLC,
Vantage Wind Energy LLC, Beech Ridge Energy LLC.
    Description: Notification of Change in Facts under Market-Based
Rate Authority of Spring Canyon Energy LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 10/20/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111020-5058.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 10, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3872-002.
    Applicants: Stony Creek Energy LLC.
    Description: Notification of Change in Facts under Market-Based
Rate Authority of Stony Creek Energy LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/20/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111020-5053.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 10, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-128-000.
    Applicants: EGP Stillwater Solar, LLC.
    Description: EGP Stillwater Solar, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: EGP Stillwater Solar, LLC MBR Tariff to be effective 11/15/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/20/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111020-5001.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 10, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-129-000.
    Applicants: Spindle Hill Energy LLC.
    Description: Spindle Hill Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Compliance Filing of a Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective
12/20/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/20/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111020-5044.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 10, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-130-000.
    Applicants: Spring Canyon Energy LLC.
    Description: Spring Canyon Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Compliance Filing of a Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective
12/20/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/20/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111020-5045.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 10, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-131-000.
    Applicants: Grays Harbor Energy LLC.
    Description: Grays Harbor Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Compliance Filing of a Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective
12/20/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/20/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111020-5049.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 10, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-132-000.
    Applicants: Wolverine Creek Energy LLC.
    Description: Wolverine Creek Energy LLC submits tariff filing per
35: Compliance Filing of a Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be
effective 12/20/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/20/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111020-5054.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 10, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-133-000.
    Applicants: Invenergy TN LLC.
    Description: Invenergy TN LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Compliance Filing of a Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective
12/20/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/20/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111020-5055.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 10, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-134-000.
    Applicants: Invenergy Cannon Falls LLC.
    Description: Invenergy Cannon Falls LLC submits tariff filing per
35: Compliance Filing of a Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be
effective 12/20/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/20/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111020-5056.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 10, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-135-000.
    Applicants: Judith Gap Energy LLC.
    Description: Judith Gap Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Compliance Filing of a Revised Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective
12/20/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/20/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111020-5057.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 10, 2011.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 20, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-27997 Filed 10-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P