The Network Customer may designate a new Network Resource by
providing the Transmission Provider with as much advance notice as
practicable. A designation of a new Network Resource must be made
through the Transmission Provider's OASIS by a request for modification
of service pursuant to an Application under Section 29. This request
must include a statement that the new network resource satisfies the
following conditions: (1) the Network Customer owns the resource, has
committed to purchase generation pursuant to an executed contract, or
has committed to purchase generation where execution of a contract is
contingent upon the availability of transmission service under Part III
of the Tariff; and (2) The Network Resources do not include any
resources, or any portion thereof, that are committed for sale to non-
designated third party load or otherwise cannot be called upon to meet
the Network Customer's Network Load on a non-interruptible basis. The
Network Customer's request will be deemed deficient if it does not
include this statement and the Transmission Provider will follow the
procedures for a deficient application as described in Section 29.2 of
the Tariff.
30.3 Termination of Network Resources
    The Network Customer may terminate the designation of all or part
of a generating resource as a Network Resource by providing
notification to the Transmission Provider through OASIS as soon as
reasonably practicable, but not later than the firm scheduling deadline
for the period of termination. Any request for termination of Network
Resource status must be submitted on OASIS, and should indicate whether
the request is for indefinite or temporary termination. A request for
indefinite termination of Network Resource status must indicate the
date and time that the termination is to be effective, and the
identification and capacity of the resource(s) or portions thereof to
be indefinitely terminated. A request for temporary termination of
Network Resource status must include the following:
    (i) Effective date and time of temporary termination;
    (ii) Effective date and time of redesignation, following period of
temporary termination;
    (iii) Identification and capacity of resource(s) or portions
thereof to be temporarily terminated;
    (iv) Resource description and attestation for redesignating the
network resource following the temporary termination, in accordance
with Section 30.2; and
    (v) Identification of any related transmission service requests to
be evaluated concomitantly with the request for temporary termination,
such that the requests for undesignation and the request for these
related transmission service requests must be approved or denied as a
single request. The evaluation of these related transmission service
requests must take into account the termination of the network
resources identified in (iii) above, as well as all competing
transmission service requests of higher priority.
    As part of a temporary termination, a Network Customer may only
redesignate the same resource that was originally designated, or a
portion thereof. Requests to redesignate a different resource and/or a
resource with increased capacity will be deemed deficient and the
Transmission Provider will follow the procedures for a deficient
application as described in Section 29.2 of the Tariff.
30.4 Operation of Network Resources
    The Network Customer shall not operate its designated Network
Resources located in the Network Customer's or Transmission Provider's
Control Area such that the output of those facilities exceeds its
designated Network Load, plus Non-Firm Sales delivered pursuant to Part
II of the Tariff, plus losses. This limitation shall not apply to
changes in the operation of a Transmission Customer's Network Resources
at the request of the Transmission Provider to respond to an emergency
or other unforeseen condition which may impair or degrade the
reliability of the Transmission System. For all Network Resources not
physically connected with the Transmission Provider's Transmission
System, the Network Customer may not schedule delivery of energy in
excess of the Network Resource's capacity, as specified in the Network
Customer's Application pursuant to Section 29, unless the Network
Customer supports such delivery within the Transmission Provider's
Transmission System by either obtaining Point-to-Point Transmission
Service or utilizing secondary service pursuant to Section 28.4. The
Transmission Provider shall specify the rate treatment and all related
terms and conditions applicable in the event that a Network Customer's
schedule at the delivery point for a Network Resource not physically
interconnected with the Transmission Provider's Transmission System
exceeds the Network Resource's designated capacity, excluding energy
delivered using secondary service or Point-to-Point Transmission
Service.
30.5 Network Customer Redispatch Obligation
    As a condition to receiving Network Integration Transmission
Service, the Network Customer agrees to redispatch its Network
Resources as requested by the Transmission Provider pursuant to Section
33.2. To the extent practical, the redispatch of resources pursuant to
this section shall be on a least cost, non-discriminatory basis between
all Network Customers, and the Transmission Provider.
30.6 Transmission Arrangements for Network Resources Not Physically
Interconnected With The Transmission Provider
    The Network Customer shall be responsible for any arrangements
necessary to deliver capacity and energy from a Network Resource not
physically interconnected with the Transmission Provider's Transmission
System. The Transmission Provider will undertake reasonable efforts to
assist the Network Customer in obtaining such arrangements, including
without limitation, providing any information or data required by such
other entity pursuant to Good Utility Practice.
30.7 Limitation on Designation of Network Resources
    The Network Customer must demonstrate that it owns or has committed
to purchase generation pursuant to an executed contract in order to
designate a generating resource as a Network Resource. Alternatively,
the Network Customer may establish that execution of a contract is
contingent upon the availability of transmission service under Part III
of the Tariff.
30.8 Use of Interface Capacity by the Network Customer
    There is no limitation upon a Network Customer's use of the
Transmission Provider's Transmission System at any particular interface
to integrate the Network Customer's Network Resources (or substitute
economy purchases) with its Network Loads. However, a Network
Customer's use of the Transmission Provider's total interface capacity
with other transmission systems may not exceed the Network Customer's
Load.
30.9 Network Customer Owned Transmission Facilities
    The Network Customer that owns existing transmission facilities
that are

integrated with the Transmission Provider's Transmission System may be
eligible to receive consideration either through a billing credit or
some other mechanism. In order to receive such consideration the
Network Customer must demonstrate that its transmission facilities are
integrated into the plans or operations of the Transmission Provider,
to serve its power and transmission customers. For facilities added by
the Network Customer subsequent to the [the effective date of a Final
Rule in RM05-25-000], the Network Customer shall receive credit for
such transmission facilities added if such facilities are integrated
into the operations of the Transmission Provider's facilities; provided
however, the Network Customer's transmission facilities shall be
presumed to be integrated if such transmission facilities, if owned by
the Transmission Provider, would be eligible for inclusion in the
Transmission Provider's annual transmission revenue requirement as
specified in Attachment H. Calculation of any credit under this
subsection shall be addressed in either the Network Customer's Service
Agreement or any other agreement between the Parties.

31 Designation of Network Load

31.1 Network Load
    The Network Customer must designate the individual Network Loads on
whose behalf the Transmission Provider will provide Network Integration
Transmission Service. The Network Loads shall be specified in the
Service Agreement.
31.2 New Network Loads Connected With the Transmission Provider
    The Network Customer shall provide the Transmission Provider with
as much advance notice as reasonably practicable of the designation of
new Network Load that will be added to its Transmission System. A
designation of new Network Load must be made through a modification of
service pursuant to a new Application. The Transmission Provider will
use due diligence to install any transmission facilities required to
interconnect a new Network Load designated by the Network Customer. The
costs of new facilities required to interconnect a new Network Load
shall be determined in accordance with the procedures provided in
Section 32.4 and shall be charged to the Network Customer in accordance
with Commission policies.
31.3 Network Load Not Physically Interconnected With the Transmission
Provider
    This section applies to both initial designation pursuant to
Section 31.1 and the subsequent addition of new Network Load not
physically interconnected with the Transmission Provider. To the extent
that the Network Customer desires to obtain transmission service for a
load outside the Transmission Provider's Transmission System, the
Network Customer shall have the option of (1) electing to include the
entire load as Network Load for all purposes under Part III of the
Tariff and designating Network Resources in connection with such
additional Network Load, or (2) excluding that entire load from its
Network Load and purchasing Point-To-Point Transmission Service under
Part II of the Tariff. To the extent that the Network Customer gives
notice of its intent to add a new Network Load as part of its Network
Load pursuant to this section the request must be made through a
modification of service pursuant to a new Application.
31.4 New Interconnection Points
    To the extent the Network Customer desires to add a new Delivery
Point or interconnection point between the Transmission Provider's
Transmission System and a Network Load, the Network Customer shall
provide the Transmission Provider with as much advance notice as
reasonably practicable.
31.5 Changes in Service Requests
    Under no circumstances shall the Network Customer's decision to
cancel or delay a requested change in Network Integration Transmission
Service (e.g. the addition of a new Network Resource or designation of
a new Network Load) in any way relieve the Network Customer of its
obligation to pay the costs of transmission facilities constructed by
the Transmission Provider and charged to the Network Customer as
reflected in the Service Agreement. However, the Transmission Provider
must treat any requested change in Network Integration Transmission
Service in a non-discriminatory manner.
31.6 Annual Load and Resource Information Updates
    The Network Customer shall provide the Transmission Provider with
annual updates of Network Load and Network Resource forecasts
consistent with those included in its Application for Network
Integration Transmission Service under Part III of the Tariff
including, but not limited to, any information provided under section
29.2(ix) pursuant to the Transmission Provider's planning process in
Attachment K. The Network Customer also shall provide the Transmission
Provider with timely written notice of material changes in any other
information provided in its Application relating to the Network
Customer's Network Load, Network Resources, its transmission system or
other aspects of its facilities or operations affecting the
Transmission Provider's ability to provide reliable service.

32 Additional Study Procedures for Network Integration Transmission
Service Requests

32.1 Notice of Need for System Impact Study
    After receiving a request for service, the Transmission Provider
shall determine on a non-discriminatory basis whether a System Impact
Study is needed. A description of the Transmission Provider's
methodology for completing a System Impact Study is provided in
Attachment D. If the Transmission Provider determines that a System
Impact Study is necessary to accommodate the requested service, it
shall so inform the Eligible Customer, as soon as practicable. In such
cases, the Transmission Provider shall within thirty (30) days of
receipt of a Completed Application, tender a System Impact Study
Agreement pursuant to which the Eligible Customer shall agree to
reimburse the Transmission Provider for performing the required System
Impact Study. For a service request to remain a Completed Application,
the Eligible Customer shall execute the System Impact Study Agreement
and return it to the Transmission Provider within fifteen (15) days. If
the Eligible Customer elects not to execute the System Impact Study
Agreement, its Application shall be deemed withdrawn and its deposit
shall be returned with interest.
32.2 System Impact Study Agreement and Cost Reimbursement
    (i) The System Impact Study Agreement will clearly specify the
Transmission Provider's estimate of the actual cost, and time for
completion of the System Impact Study. The charge shall not exceed the
actual cost of the study. In performing the System Impact Study, the
Transmission Provider shall rely, to the extent reasonably practicable,
on existing transmission planning studies. The Eligible Customer will
not be assessed a charge for such existing studies; however, the
Eligible

Customer will be responsible for charges associated with any
modifications to existing planning studies that are reasonably
necessary to evaluate the impact of the Eligible Customer's request for
service on the Transmission System.
    (ii) If in response to multiple Eligible Customers requesting
service in relation to the same competitive solicitation, a single
System Impact Study is sufficient for the Transmission Provider to
accommodate the service requests, the costs of that study shall be pro-
rated among the Eligible Customers.
    (iii) For System Impact Studies that the Transmission Provider
conducts on its own behalf, the Transmission Provider shall record the
cost of the System Impact Studies pursuant to Section 8.
32.3 System Impact Study Procedures
    Upon receipt of an executed System Impact Study Agreement, the
Transmission Provider will use due diligence to complete the required
System Impact Study within a sixty (60) day period. The System Impact
Study shall identify any system constraints and redispatch options,
additional Direct Assignment Facilities or Network Upgrades required to
provide the requested service. In the event that the Transmission
Provider is unable to complete the required System Impact Study within
such time period, it shall so notify the Eligible Customer and provide
an estimated completion date along with an explanation of the reasons
why additional time is required to complete the required studies. A
copy of the completed System Impact Study and related work papers shall
be made available to the Eligible Customer as soon as the System Impact
Study is complete. The Transmission Provider will use the same due
diligence in completing the System Impact Study for an Eligible
Customer as it uses when completing studies for itself. The
Transmission Provider shall notify the Eligible Customer immediately
upon completion of the System Impact Study if the Transmission System
will be adequate to accommodate all or part of a request for service or
that no costs are likely to be incurred for new transmission facilities
or upgrades. In order for a request to remain a Completed Application,
within fifteen (15) days of completion of the System Impact Study the
Eligible Customer must execute a Service Agreement or request the
filing of an unexecuted Service Agreement, or the Application shall be
deemed terminated and withdrawn.
32.4 Facilities Study Procedures
    If a System Impact Study indicates that additions or upgrades to
the Transmission System are needed to supply the Eligible Customer's
service request, the Transmission Provider, within thirty (30) days of
the completion of the System Impact Study, shall tender to the Eligible
Customer a Facilities Study Agreement pursuant to which the Eligible
Customer shall agree to reimburse the Transmission Provider for
performing the required Facilities Study. For a service request to
remain a Completed Application, the Eligible Customer shall execute the
Facilities Study Agreement and return it to the Transmission Provider
within fifteen (15) days. If the Eligible Customer elects not to
execute the Facilities Study Agreement, its Application shall be deemed
withdrawn and its deposit shall be returned with interest. Upon receipt
of an executed Facilities Study Agreement, the Transmission Provider
will use due diligence to complete the required Facilities Study within
a sixty (60) day period. If the Transmission Provider is unable to
complete the Facilities Study in the allotted time period, the
Transmission Provider shall notify the Eligible Customer and provide an
estimate of the time needed to reach a final determination along with
an explanation of the reasons that additional time is required to
complete the study. When completed, the Facilities Study will include a
good faith estimate of (i) the cost of Direct Assignment Facilities to
be charged to the Eligible Customer, (ii) the Eligible Customer's
appropriate share of the cost of any required Network Upgrades, and
(iii) the time required to complete such construction and initiate the
requested service. The Eligible Customer shall provide the Transmission
Provider with a letter of credit or other reasonable form of security
acceptable to the Transmission Provider equivalent to the costs of new
facilities or upgrades consistent with commercial practices as
established by the Uniform Commercial Code. The Eligible Customer shall
have thirty (30) days to execute a Service Agreement or request the
filing of an unexecuted Service Agreement and provide the required
letter of credit or other form of security or the request no longer
will be a Completed Application and shall be deemed terminated and
withdrawn.
32.5 Penalties for Failure To Meet Study Deadlines
    Section 19.9 defines penalties that apply for failure to meet the
60-day study completion due diligence deadlines for System Impact
Studies and Facilities Studies under Part II of the Tariff. These same
requirements and penalties apply to service under Part III of the
Tariff.

33 Load Shedding and Curtailments

33.1 Procedures
    Prior to the Service Commencement Date, the Transmission Provider
and the Network Customer shall establish Load Shedding and Curtailment
procedures pursuant to the Network Operating Agreement with the
objective of responding to contingencies on the Transmission System and
on systems directly and indirectly interconnected with Transmission
Provider's Transmission System. The Parties will implement such
programs during any period when the Transmission Provider determines
that a system contingency exists and such procedures are necessary to
alleviate such contingency. The Transmission Provider will notify all
affected Network Customers in a timely manner of any scheduled
Curtailment.
33.2 Transmission Constraints
    During any period when the Transmission Provider determines that a
transmission constraint exists on the Transmission System, and such
constraint may impair the reliability of the Transmission Provider's
system, the Transmission Provider will take whatever actions,
consistent with Good Utility Practice, that are reasonably necessary to
maintain the reliability of the Transmission Provider's system. To the
extent the Transmission Provider determines that the reliability of the
Transmission System can be maintained by redispatching resources, the
Transmission Provider will initiate procedures pursuant to the Network
Operating Agreement to redispatch all Network Resources and the
Transmission Provider's own resources on a least-cost basis without
regard to the ownership of such resources. Any redispatch under this
section may not unduly discriminate between the Transmission Provider's
use of the Transmission System on behalf of its Native Load Customers
and any Network Customer's use of the Transmission System to serve its
designated Network Load.
33.3 Cost Responsibility for Relieving Transmission Constraints
    Whenever the Transmission Provider implements least-cost redispatch
procedures in response to a transmission constraint, the Transmission
Provider and Network

Customers will each bear a proportionate share of the total redispatch
cost based on their respective Load Ratio Shares.
33.4 Curtailments of Scheduled Deliveries
    If a transmission constraint on the Transmission Provider's
Transmission System cannot be relieved through the implementation of
least-cost redispatch procedures and the Transmission Provider
determines that it is necessary to Curtail scheduled deliveries, the
Parties shall Curtail such schedules in accordance with the Network
Operating Agreement or pursuant to the Transmission Loading Relief
procedures specified in Attachment J.
33.5 Allocation of Curtailments
    The Transmission Provider shall, on a non-discriminatory basis,
Curtail the transaction(s) that effectively relieve the constraint.
However, to the extent practicable and consistent with Good Utility
Practice, any Curtailment will be shared by the Transmission Provider
and Network Customer in proportion to their respective Load Ratio
Shares. The Transmission Provider shall not direct the Network Customer
to Curtail schedules to an extent greater than the Transmission
Provider would Curtail the Transmission Provider's schedules under
similar circumstances.
33.6 Load Shedding
    To the extent that a system contingency exists on the Transmission
Provider's Transmission System and the Transmission Provider determines
that it is necessary for the Transmission Provider and the Network
Customer to shed load, the Parties shall shed load in accordance with
previously established procedures under the Network Operating
Agreement.
33.7 System Reliability
    Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Tariff, the
Transmission Provider reserves the right, consistent with Good Utility
Practice and on a not unduly discriminatory basis, to Curtail Network
Integration Transmission Service without liability on the Transmission
Provider's part for the purpose of making necessary adjustments to,
changes in, or repairs on its lines, substations and facilities, and in
cases where the continuance of Network Integration Transmission Service
would endanger persons or property. In the event of any adverse
condition(s) or disturbance(s) on the Transmission Provider's
Transmission System or on any other system(s) directly or indirectly
interconnected with the Transmission Provider's Transmission System,
the Transmission Provider, consistent with Good Utility Practice, also
may Curtail Network Integration Transmission Service in order to (i)
limit the extent or damage of the adverse condition(s) or
disturbance(s), (ii) prevent damage to generating or transmission
facilities, or (iii) expedite restoration of service. The Transmission
Provider will give the Network Customer as much advance notice as is
practicable in the event of such Curtailment. Any Curtailment of
Network Integration Transmission Service will be not unduly
discriminatory relative to the Transmission Provider's use of the
Transmission System on behalf of its Native Load Customers. The
Transmission Provider shall specify the rate treatment and all related
terms and conditions applicable in the event that the Network Customer
fails to respond to established Load Shedding and Curtailment
procedures.

34 Rates and Charges

    The Network Customer shall pay the Transmission Provider for any
Direct Assignment Facilities, Ancillary Services, and applicable study
costs, consistent with Commission policy, along with the following:
34.1 Monthly Demand Charge
    The Network Customer shall pay a monthly Demand Charge, which shall
be determined by multiplying its Load Ratio Share times one twelfth
(\1/12\) of the Transmission Provider's Annual Transmission Revenue
Requirement specified in Schedule H.
34.2 Determination of Network Customer's Monthly Network Load
    The Network Customer's monthly Network Load is its hourly load
(including its designated Network Load not physically interconnected
with the Transmission Provider under Section 31.3) coincident with the
Transmission Provider's Monthly Transmission System Peak.
34.3 Determination of Transmission Provider's Monthly Transmission
System Load
    The Transmission Provider's monthly Transmission System load is the
Transmission Provider's Monthly Transmission System Peak minus the
coincident peak usage of all Firm Point-To-Point Transmission Service
customers pursuant to Part II of this Tariff plus the Reserved Capacity
of all Firm Point-To-Point Transmission Service customers.
34.4 Redispatch Charge
    The Network Customer shall pay a Load Ratio Share of any redispatch
costs allocated between the Network Customer and the Transmission
Provider pursuant to Section 33. To the extent that the Transmission
Provider incurs an obligation to the Network Customer for redispatch
costs in accordance with Section 33, such amounts shall be credited
against the Network Customer's bill for the applicable month.
34.5 Stranded Cost Recovery
    The Transmission Provider may seek to recover stranded costs from
the Network Customer pursuant to this Tariff in accordance with the
terms, conditions and procedures set forth in FERC Order No. 888.
However, the Transmission Provider must separately file any proposal to
recover stranded costs under Section 205 of the Federal Power Act.

35 Operating Arrangements

35.1 Operation Under the Network Operating Agreement
    The Network Customer shall plan, construct, operate and maintain
its facilities in accordance with Good Utility Practice and in
conformance with the Network Operating Agreement.
35.2 Network Operating Agreement
    The terms and conditions under which the Network Customer shall
operate its facilities and the technical and operational matters
associated with the implementation of Part III of the Tariff shall be
specified in the Network Operating Agreement. The Network Operating
Agreement shall provide for the Parties to (i) operate and maintain
equipment necessary for integrating the Network Customer within the
Transmission Provider's Transmission System (including, but not limited
to, remote terminal units, metering, communications equipment and
relaying equipment), (ii) transfer data between the Transmission
Provider and the Network Customer (including, but not limited to, heat
rates and operational characteristics of Network Resources, generation
schedules for units outside the Transmission Provider's Transmission
System, interchange schedules, unit outputs for redispatch required
under Section 33, voltage schedules, loss factors and other real time
data), (iii) use software programs required for data links and
constraint dispatching, (iv) exchange data on forecasted loads and
resources necessary for long-term planning, and (v) address any other
technical and

operational considerations required for implementation of Part III of
the Tariff, including scheduling protocols. The Network Operating
Agreement will recognize that the Network Customer shall either (i)
operate as a Control Area under applicable guidelines of the Electric
Reliability Organization (ERO) as defined in 18 CFR 39.1, (ii) satisfy
its Control Area requirements, including all necessary Ancillary
Services, by contracting with the Transmission Provider, or (iii)
satisfy its Control Area requirements, including all necessary
Ancillary Services, by contracting with another entity, consistent with
Good Utility Practice, which satisfies the applicable reliability
guidelines of the ERO. The Transmission Provider shall not unreasonably
refuse to accept contractual arrangements with another entity for
Ancillary Services. The Network Operating Agreement is included in
Attachment G.
35.3 Network Operating Committee
    A Network Operating Committee (Committee) shall be established to
coordinate operating criteria for the Parties' respective
responsibilities under the Network Operating Agreement. Each Network
Customer shall be entitled to have at least one representative on the
Committee. The Committee shall meet from time to time as need requires,
but no less than once each calendar year.

Schedule 1--Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch Service

    This service is required to schedule the movement of power through,
out of, within, or into a Control Area. This service can be provided
only by the operator of the Control Area in which the transmission
facilities used for transmission service are located. Scheduling,
System Control and Dispatch Service is to be provided directly by the
Transmission Provider (if the Transmission Provider is the Control Area
operator) or indirectly by the Transmission Provider making
arrangements with the Control Area operator that performs this service
for the Transmission Provider's Transmission System. The Transmission
Customer must purchase this service from the Transmission Provider or
the Control Area operator. The charges for Scheduling, System Control
and Dispatch Service are to be based on the rates set forth below. To
the extent the Control Area operator performs this service for the
Transmission Provider, charges to the Transmission Customer are to
reflect only a pass-through of the costs charged to the Transmission
Provider by that Control Area operator.

Schedule 2--Reactive Supply and Voltage Control From Generation or
Other Sources Service

    In order to maintain transmission voltages on the Transmission
Provider's transmission facilities within acceptable limits, generation
facilities and non-generation resources capable of providing this
service that are under the control of the control area operator are
operated to produce (or absorb) reactive power. Thus, Reactive Supply
and Voltage Control from Generation or Other Sources Service must be
provided for each transaction on the Transmission Provider's
transmission facilities. The amount of Reactive Supply and Voltage
Control from Generation or Other Sources Service that must be supplied
with respect to the Transmission Customer's transaction will be
determined based on the reactive power support necessary to maintain
transmission voltages within limits that are generally accepted in the
region and consistently adhered to by the Transmission Provider.
    Reactive Supply and Voltage Control from Generation or Other
Sources Service is to be provided directly by the Transmission Provider
(if the Transmission Provider is the Control Area operator) or
indirectly by the Transmission Provider making arrangements with the
Control Area operator that performs this service for the Transmission
Provider's Transmission System. The Transmission Customer must purchase
this service from the Transmission Provider or the Control Area
operator. The charges for such service will be based on the rates set
forth below. To the extent the Control Area operator performs this
service for the Transmission Provider, charges to the Transmission
Customer are to reflect only a pass-through of the costs charged to the
Transmission Provider by the Control Area operator.

Schedule 3--Regulation and Frequency Response Service

    Regulation and Frequency Response Service is necessary to provide
for the continuous balancing of resources (generation and interchange)
with load and for maintaining scheduled Interconnection frequency at
sixty cycles per second (60 Hz). Regulation and Frequency Response
Service is accomplished by committing on-line generation whose output
is raised or lowered (predominantly through the use of automatic
generating control equipment) and by other non-generation resources
capable of providing this service as necessary to follow the moment-by-
moment changes in load. The obligation to maintain this balance between
resources and load lies with the Transmission Provider (or the Control
Area operator that performs this function for the Transmission
Provider). The Transmission Provider must offer this service when the
transmission service is used to serve load within its Control Area. The
Transmission Customer must either purchase this service from the
Transmission Provider or make alternative comparable arrangements to
satisfy its Regulation and Frequency Response Service obligation. The
amount of and charges for Regulation and Frequency Response Service are
set forth below. To the extent the Control Area operator performs this
service for the Transmission Provider, charges to the Transmission
Customer are to reflect only a pass-through of the costs charged to the
Transmission Provider by that Control Area operator.

Schedule 4--Energy Imbalance Service

    Energy Imbalance Service is provided when a difference occurs
between the scheduled and the actual delivery of energy to a load
located within a Control Area over a single hour. The Transmission
Provider must offer this service when the transmission service is used
to serve load within its Control Area. The Transmission Customer must
either purchase this service from the Transmission Provider or make
alternative comparable arrangements, which may include use of non-
generation resources capable of providing this service, to satisfy its
Energy Imbalance Service obligation. To the extent the Control Area
operator performs this service for the Transmission Provider, charges
to the Transmission Customer are to reflect only a pass-through of the
costs charged to the Transmission Provider by that Control Area
operator. The Transmission Provider may charge a Transmission Customer
a penalty for either hourly generator imbalances under Schedule 9 or
hourly energy imbalances under this Schedule for the same imbalance,
but not both.
    The Transmission Provider shall establish charges for energy
imbalance based on the deviation bands as follows: (i) Deviations
within +/-1.5 percent (with a minimum of 2 MW) of the scheduled
transaction to be applied hourly to any energy imbalance that occurs as
a result of the Transmission Customer's scheduled transaction(s) will
be netted on a monthly basis and settled financially, at the end of the
month, at 100 percent of incremental or decremental cost; (ii)
deviations greater than +/-1.5 percent up to 7.5 percent

(or greater than 2 MW up to 10 MW) of the scheduled transaction to be
applied hourly to any energy imbalance that occurs as a result of the
Transmission Customer's scheduled transaction(s) will be settled
financially, at the end of each month, at 110 percent of incremental
cost or 90 percent of decremental cost, and (iii) deviations greater
than +/-7.5 percent (or 10 MW) of the scheduled transaction to be
applied hourly to any energy imbalance that occurs as a result of the
Transmission Customer's scheduled transaction(s) will be settled
financially, at the end of each month, at 125 percent of incremental
cost or 75 percent of decremental cost.

    For purposes of this Schedule, incremental cost and decremental
cost represent the Transmission Provider's actual average hourly
cost of the last 10 MW dispatched to supply the Transmission
Provider's Native Load Customers, based on the replacement cost of
fuel, unit heat rates, start-up costs (including any commitment and
redispatch costs), incremental operation and maintenance costs, and
purchased and interchange power costs and taxes, as applicable.

Schedule 5--Operating Reserve--Spinning Reserve Service

    Spinning Reserve Service is needed to serve load immediately in the
event of a system contingency. Spinning Reserve Service may be provided
by generating units that are on-line and loaded at less than maximum
output and by non-generation resources capable of providing this
service. The Transmission Provider must offer this service when the
transmission service is used to serve load within its Control Area. The
Transmission Customer must either purchase this service from the
Transmission Provider or make alternative comparable arrangements to
satisfy its Spinning Reserve Service obligation. The amount of and
charges for Spinning Reserve Service are set forth below. To the extent
the Control Area operator performs this service for the Transmission
Provider, charges to the Transmission Customer are to reflect only a
pass-through of the costs charged to the Transmission Provider by that
Control Area operator.

Schedule 6--Operating Reserve--Supplemental Reserve Service

    Supplemental Reserve Service is needed to serve load in the event
of a system contingency; however, it is not available immediately to
serve load but rather within a short period of time. Supplemental
Reserve Service may be provided by generating units that are on-line
but unloaded, by quick-start generation or by interruptible load or
other non-generation resources capable of providing this service. The
Transmission Provider must offer this service when the transmission
service is used to serve load within its Control Area. The Transmission
Customer must either purchase this service from the Transmission
Provider or make alternative comparable arrangements to satisfy its
Supplemental Reserve Service obligation. The amount of and charges for
Supplemental Reserve Service are set forth below. To the extent the
Control Area operator performs this service for the Transmission
Provider, charges to the Transmission Customer are to reflect only a
pass-through of the costs charged to the Transmission Provider by that
Control Area operator.

Schedule 7--Long-Term Firm and Short-Term Firm Point-To-Point
Transmission Service

    The Transmission Customer shall compensate the Transmission
Provider each month for Reserved Capacity at the sum of the applicable
charges set forth below:
    (1) Yearly delivery: one-twelfth of the demand charge of $----/KW
of Reserved Capacity per year.
    (2) Monthly delivery: $----/KW of Reserved Capacity per month.
    (3) Weekly delivery: $----/KW of Reserved Capacity per week.
    (4) Daily delivery: $----/KW of Reserved Capacity per day.
    The total demand charge in any week, pursuant to a reservation for
Daily delivery, shall not exceed the rate specified in section (3)
above times the highest amount in kilowatts of Reserved Capacity in any
day during such week.
    (5) Discounts: Three principal requirements apply to discounts for
transmission service as follows (1) any offer of a discount made by the
Transmission Provider must be announced to all Eligible Customers
solely by posting on the OASIS, (2) any customer-initiated requests for
discounts (including requests for use by one's wholesale merchant or an
affiliate's use) must occur solely by posting on the OASIS, and (3)
once a discount is negotiated, details must be immediately posted on
the OASIS. For any discount agreed upon for service on a path, from
point(s) of receipt to point(s) of delivery, the Transmission Provider
must offer the same discounted transmission service rate for the same
time period to all Eligible Customers on all unconstrained transmission
paths that go to the same point(s) of delivery on the Transmission
System.

Schedule 8--Non-Firm Point-To-Point Transmission Service

    The Transmission Customer shall compensate the Transmission
Provider for Non-Firm Point-To-Point Transmission Service up to the sum
of the applicable charges set forth below:
    (1) Monthly delivery: $----/KW of Reserved Capacity per month.
    (2) Weekly delivery: $----/KW of Reserved Capacity per week.
    (3) Daily delivery: $----/KW of Reserved Capacity per day.
    The total demand charge in any week, pursuant to a reservation for
Daily delivery, shall not exceed the rate specified in section (2)
above times the highest amount in kilowatts of Reserved Capacity in any
day during such week.
    (4) Hourly delivery: The basic charge shall be that agreed upon by
the Parties at the time this service is reserved and in no event shall
exceed $----/MWH. The total demand charge in any day, pursuant to a
reservation for Hourly delivery, shall not exceed the rate specified in
section (3) above times the highest amount in kilowatts of Reserved
Capacity in any hour during such day. In addition, the total demand
charge in any week, pursuant to a reservation for Hourly or Daily
delivery, shall not exceed the rate specified in section (2) above
times the highest amount in kilowatts of Reserved Capacity in any hour
during such week.
    (5) Discounts: Three principal requirements apply to discounts for
transmission service as follows (1) any offer of a discount made by the
Transmission Provider must be announced to all Eligible Customers
solely by posting on the OASIS, (2) any customer-initiated requests for
discounts (including requests for use by one's wholesale merchant or an
affiliate's use) must occur solely by posting on the OASIS, and (3)
once a discount is negotiated, details must be immediately posted on
the OASIS. For any discount agreed upon for service on a path, from
point(s) of receipt to point(s) of delivery, the Transmission Provider
must offer the same discounted transmission service rate for the same
time period to all Eligible Customers on all unconstrained transmission
paths that go to the same point(s) of delivery on the Transmission
System.

Schedule 9--Generator Imbalance Service

    Generator Imbalance Service is provided when a difference occurs
between the output of a generator located in the Transmission
Provider's Control Area and a delivery schedule from that generator to
(1) another

Control Area or (2) a load within the Transmission Provider's Control
Area over a single hour. The Transmission Provider must offer this
service when Transmission Service is used to deliver energy from a
generator located within its Control Area. The Transmission Customer
must either purchase this service from the Transmission Provider or
make alternative comparable arrangements, which may include use of non-
generation resources capable of providing this service, to satisfy its
Generator Imbalance Service obligation. To the extent the Control Area
operator performs this service for the Transmission Provider, charges
to the Transmission Customer are to reflect only a pass-through of the
costs charged to the Transmission Provider by that Control Area
Operator. The Transmission Provider may charge a Transmission Customer
a penalty for either hourly generator imbalances under this Schedule or
hourly energy imbalances under Schedule 4 for the same imbalance, but
not both.
    The Transmission Provider shall establish charges for generator
imbalance based on the deviation bands as follows: (i) Deviations
within +/-1.5 percent (with a minimum of 2 MW) of the scheduled
transaction to be applied hourly to any generator imbalance that occurs
as a result of the Transmission Customer's scheduled transaction(s)
will be netted on a monthly basis and settled financially, at the end
of each month, at 100 percent of incremental or decremental cost, (ii)
deviations greater than +/-1.5 percent up to 7.5 percent (or greater
than 2 MW up to 10 MW) of the scheduled transaction to be applied
hourly to any generator imbalance that occurs as a result of the
Transmission Customer's scheduled transaction(s) will be settled
financially, at the end of each month, at 110 percent of incremental
cost or 90 percent of decremental cost, and (iii) deviations greater
than +/-7.5 percent (or 10 MW) of the scheduled transaction to be
applied hourly to any generator imbalance that occurs as a result of
the Transmission Customer's scheduled transaction(s) will be settled at
125 percent of incremental cost or 75 percent of decremental cost,
except that an intermittent resource will be exempt from this deviation
band and will pay the deviation band charges for all deviations greater
than the larger of 1.5 percent or 2 MW. An intermittent resource, for
the limited purpose of this Schedule is an electric generator that is
not dispatchable and cannot store its fuel source and therefore cannot
respond to changes in system demand or respond to transmission security
constraints.
    For purposes of this Schedule, incremental cost and decremental
cost represent the Transmission Provider's actual average hourly cost
of the last 10 MW dispatched to supply the Transmission Provider's
Native Load Customers, based on the replacement cost of fuel, unit heat
rates, start-up costs (including any commitment and redispatch costs),
incremental operation and maintenance costs, and purchased and
interchange power costs and taxes, as applicable.

Attachment A--Form Of Service Agreement For Firm Point-To-Point
Transmission Service

    1.0 This Service Agreement, dated as of --------, is entered
into, by and between -------- (the Transmission Provider), and ----
---- (``Transmission Customer'').
    2.0 The Transmission Customer has been determined by the
Transmission Provider to have a Completed Application for Firm
Point-To-Point Transmission Service under the Tariff.
    3.0 The Transmission Customer has provided to the Transmission
Provider an Application deposit in accordance with the provisions of
Section 17.3 of the Tariff.
    4.0 Service under this agreement shall commence on the later of
(l) the requested service commencement date, or (2) the date on
which construction of any Direct Assignment Facilities and/or
Network Upgrades are completed, or (3) such other date as it is
permitted to become effective by the Commission. Service under this
agreement shall terminate on such date as mutually agreed upon by
the parties.
    5.0 The Transmission Provider agrees to provide and the
Transmission Customer agrees to take and pay for Firm Point-To-Point
Transmission Service in accordance with the provisions of Part II of
the Tariff and this Service Agreement.
    6.0 Any notice or request made to or by either Party regarding
this Service Agreement shall be made to the representative of the
other Party as indicated below.
    Transmission Provider:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Transmission Customer:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    7.0 The Tariff is incorporated herein and made a part hereof.
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Service
Agreement to be executed by their respective authorized officials.
    Transmission Provider:

    By:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Name

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Title

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date

    Transmission Customer:

    By:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Name

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Title

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date

Specifications for Long-Term Firm Point-to-Point Transmission
Service

1.0 Term of Transaction:-----------------------------------------------

Start Date:------------------------------------------------------------

Termination Date:------------------------------------------------------

2.0 Description of capacity and energy to be transmitted by
Transmission Provider including the electric Control Area in which
the transaction originates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

3.0 Point(s) of Receipt:-----------------------------------------------

Delivering Party:------------------------------------------------------

4.0 Point(s) of Delivery:----------------------------------------------

Receiving Party:-------------------------------------------------------

5.0 Maximum amount of capacity and energy to be transmitted (Reserved
Capacity):-------------------------------------------------------------

6.0 Designation of party(ies) subject to reciprocal service obligation:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

7.0 Name(s) of any Intervening Systems providing transmission service:-

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

8.0 Service under this Agreement may be subject to some combination
of the charges detailed below. (The appropriate charges for
individual transactions will be determined in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the Tariff.)

8.1 Transmission Charge:-----------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

8.2 System Impact and/or Facilities Study Charge(s):

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

8.3 Direct Assignment Facilities Charge:-------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

8.4 Ancillary Services Charges:----------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment A-1--Form of Service Agreement for the Resale, Reassignment
or Transfer of Long-Term Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service

    1.0 This Service Agreement, dated as of --------, is entered
into, by and between -------- (the Transmission Provider), and ----
---- (the Assignee).
    2.0 The Assignee has been determined by the Transmission
Provider to be an Eligible Customer under the Tariff pursuant to
which

the transmission service rights to be transferred were originally
obtained.
    3.0 The terms and conditions for the transaction entered into
under this Service Agreement shall be subject to the terms and
conditions of Part II of the Transmission Provider's Tariff, except
for those terms and conditions negotiated by the Reseller, as
identified below, of the reassigned transmission capacity (pursuant
to Section 23.1 of this Tariff) and the Assignee and appropriately
specified in this Service Agreement. Such negotiated terms and
conditions include: contract effective and termination dates, the
amount of reassigned capacity or energy, point(s) of receipt and
delivery. Changes by the Assignee to the Reseller's Points of
Receipt and Points of Delivery will be subject to the provisions of
Section 23.2 of this Tariff.
    4.0 The Transmission Provider shall credit or charge the
Reseller, as appropriate, for any difference between the price
reflected in the Assignee's Service Agreement and the Reseller's
Service Agreement with the Transmission Provider.
    5.0 Any notice or request made to or by either Party regarding
this Service Agreement shall be made to the representative of the
other Party as indicated below.
    Transmission Provider:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Assignee:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    6.0 The Tariff is incorporated herein and made a part hereof.
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Service
Agreement to be executed by their respective authorized officials.
    Transmission Provider:

    By:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Name

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Title

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date

    Assignee:
    By:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Name

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Title

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date

Specifications for the Resale, Reassignment or Transfer of Long-
Term Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service

1.0 Term of Transaction:-----------------------------------------------

Start Date:------------------------------------------------------------

Termination Date:------------------------------------------------------

2.0 Description of capacity and energy to be transmitted by
Transmission Provider including the electric Control Area in which the
transaction originates.------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

3.0 Point(s) of Receipt:-----------------------------------------------

Delivering Party:------------------------------------------------------

4.0 Point(s) of Delivery:----------------------------------------------

Receiving Party:-------------------------------------------------------

5.0 Maximum amount of reassigned capacity:-----------------------------

6.0 Designation of party(ies) subject to reciprocal service obligation:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

7.0 Name(s) of any Intervening Systems providing transmission service:-

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

8.0 Service under this Agreement may be subject to some combination
of the charges detailed below. (The appropriate charges for
individual transactions will be determined in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the Tariff.)

8.1 Transmission Charge:-----------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

8.2 System Impact and/or Facilities Study Charge(s):

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

8.3 Direct Assignment Facilities Charge:-------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

8.4 Ancillary Services Charges:----------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

9.0 Name of Reseller of the reassigned transmission capacity:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment B--Form of Service Agreement for Non-Firm Point-to-Point
Transmission Service

    1.0 This Service Agreement, dated as of --------, is entered
into, by and between -------- (the Transmission Provider), and ----
---- (Transmission Customer).
    2.0 The Transmission Customer has been determined by the
Transmission Provider to be a Transmission Customer under Part II of
the Tariff and has filed a Completed Application for Non-Firm Point-
To-Point Transmission Service in accordance with Section 18.2 of the
Tariff.
    3.0 Service under this Agreement shall be provided by the
Transmission Provider upon request by an authorized representative
of the Transmission Customer.
    4.0 The Transmission Customer agrees to supply information the
Transmission Provider deems reasonably necessary in accordance with
Good Utility Practice in order for it to provide the requested
service.
    5.0 The Transmission Provider agrees to provide and the
Transmission Customer agrees to take and pay for Non-Firm Point-To-
Point Transmission Service in accordance with the provisions of Part
II of the Tariff and this Service Agreement.
    6.0 Any notice or request made to or by either Party regarding
this Service Agreement shall be made to the representative of the
other Party as indicated below.
    Transmission Provider:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Transmission Customer:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    7.0 The Tariff is incorporated herein and made a part hereof.
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Service
Agreement to be executed by their respective authorized officials.
    Transmission Provider:

    By:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Name

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Title

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date

    Transmission Customer:

    By:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Name

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Title

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date

Attachment C--Methodology To Assess Available Transfer Capability

    The Transmission Provider must include, at a minimum, the
following information concerning its ATC calculation methodology:
    (1) A detailed description of the specific mathematical
algorithm used to calculate firm and non-firm ATC (and AFC, if
applicable) for its scheduling horizon (same day and real-time),
operating horizon (day ahead and pre-schedule) and planning horizon
(beyond the operating horizon);
    (2) A process flow diagram that illustrates the various steps
through which ATC/AFC is calculated; and
    (3) A detailed explanation of how each of the ATC components is
calculated for both the operating and planning horizons.
    (a) For TTC, a Transmission Provider shall: (i) explain its
definition of TTC; (ii) explain its TTC calculation methodology;
(iii) list the databases used in its TTC assessments; and (iv)
explain the assumptions used in its TTC assessments regarding load
levels, generation dispatch, and modeling of planned and contingency
outages.
    (b) For ETC, a transmission provider shall explain: (i) its
definition of ETC; (ii) the calculation methodology used to
determine the transmission capacity to be set aside for native load
(including network load), and non-OATT customers (including, if
applicable, an explanation of assumptions on the selection of
generators that are modeled in service); (iii) how point-to-point
transmission service requests are incorporated; (iv) how rollover
rights are accounted for; and (v) its processes for ensuring that
non-firm capacity is released

properly (e.g., when real time schedules replace the associated
transmission service requests in its real-time calculations).
    (c) If a Transmission Provider uses an AFC methodology to
calculate ATC, it shall:
    (i) explain its definition of AFC; (ii) explain its AFC
calculation methodology; (iii) explain its process for converting
AFC into ATC for OASIS posting; (iv) list the databases used in its
AFC assessments; and (v) explain the assumptions used in its AFC
assessments regarding load levels, generation dispatch, and modeling
of planned and contingency outages.
    (d) For TRM, a Transmission Provider shall explain: (i) its
definition of TRM; (ii) its TRM calculation methodology (e.g., its
assumptions on load forecast errors, forecast errors in system
topology or distribution factors and loop flow sources); (iii) the
databases used in its TRM assessments; (iv) the conditions under
which the transmission provider uses TRM. A Transmission Provider
that does not set aside transfer capability for TRM must so state.
    (e) For CBM, the Transmission Provider shall state include a
specific and self-contained narrative explanation of its CBM
practice, including: (i) an identification of the entity who
performs the resource adequacy analysis for CBM determination; (ii)
the methodology used to perform generation reliability assessments
(e.g., probabilistic or deterministic); (iii) an explanation of
whether the assessment method reflects a specific regional practice;
(iv) the assumptions used in this assessment; and (v) the basis for
the selection of paths on which CBM is set aside.
    (f) In addition, for CBM, a Transmission Provider shall: (i)
explain its definition of CBM; (ii) list the databases used in its
CBM calculations; and (iii) demonstrate that there is no double-
counting of contingency outages when performing CBM, TTC, and TRM
calculations.
    (g) The Transmission Provider shall explain its procedures for
allowing the use of CBM during emergencies (with an explanation of
what constitutes an emergency, the entities that are permitted to
use CBM during emergencies and the procedures which must be followed
by the transmission providers' merchant function and other load-
serving entities when they need to access CBM). If the Transmission
Provider's practice is not to set aside transfer capability for CBM,
it shall so state.

Attachment D--Methodology for Completing a System Impact Study

    To be filed by the Transmission Provider

Attachment E--Index of Point-To-Point Transmission Service Customers

Customer
Date of Service Agreement

Attachment F--Service Agreement for Network Integration Transmission
Service

To be filed by the Transmission Provider

Attachment G--Network Operating Agreement

To be filed by the Transmission Provider

Attachment H--Annual Transmission Revenue Requirement for Network
Integration Transmission Service

    1. The Annual Transmission Revenue Requirement for purposes of
the Network Integration Transmission Service shall be --------.
    2. The amount in (1) shall be effective until amended by the
Transmission Provider or modified by the Commission.

Attachment I--Index of Network Integration Transmission Service
Customers

Customer
Date of Service Agreement

Attachment J--Procedures for Addressing Parallel Flows

To be filed by the Transmission Provider

Attachment K--Transmission Planning Process

    The Transmission Provider shall establish a coordinated, open
and transparent planning process with its Network and Firm Point-to-
Point Transmission Customers and other interested parties, including
the coordination of such planning with interconnected systems within
its region, to ensure that the Transmission System is planned to
meet the needs of both the Transmission Provider and its Network and
Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Customers on a comparable and
nondiscriminatory basis. The Transmission Provider's coordinated,
open and transparent planning process shall be provided as an
attachment to the Transmission Provider's Tariff.
    The Transmission Provider's planning process shall satisfy the
following nine principles, as defined in the Final Rule in Docket
No. RM05-25-000: coordination, openness, transparency, information
exchange, comparability, dispute resolution, regional participation,
economic planning studies, and cost allocation for new projects. The
planning process shall also provide a mechanism for the recovery and
allocation of planning costs consistent with the Final Rule in
Docket No. RM05-25-000.
    The Transmission Provider's planning process must include
sufficient detail to enable Transmission Customers to understand:
    (i) The process for consulting with customers and neighboring
transmission providers;
    (ii) The notice procedures and anticipated frequency of
meetings;
    (iii) The methodology, criteria, and processes used to develop
transmission plans;
    (iv) The method of disclosure of criteria, assumptions and data
underlying transmission system plans;
    (v) The obligations of and methods for customers to submit data
to the transmission provider;
    (vi) The dispute resolution process;
    (vii) The transmission provider's study procedures for economic
upgrades to address congestion or the integration of new resources;
and
    (viii) The relevant cost allocation procedures or principles.

Attachment L--Creditworthiness Procedures

    For the purpose of determining the ability of the Transmission
Customer to meet its obligations related to service hereunder, the
Transmission Provider may require reasonable credit review
procedures. This review shall be made in accordance with standard
commercial practices and must specify quantitative and qualitative
criteria to determine the level of secured and unsecured credit.
    The Transmission Provider may require the Transmission Customer
to provide and maintain in effect during the term of the Service
Agreement, an unconditional and irrevocable letter of credit as
security to meet its responsibilities and obligations under the
Tariff, or an alternative form of security proposed by the
Transmission Customer and acceptable to the Transmission Provider
and consistent with commercial practices established by the Uniform
Commercial Code that protects the Transmission Provider against the
risk of non-payment.
    Additionally, the Transmission Provider must include, at a
minimum, the following information concerning its creditworthiness
procedures:
    (1) a summary of the procedure for determining the level of
secured and unsecured credit;
    (2) a list of the acceptable types of collateral/security;
    (3) a procedure for providing customers with reasonable notice
of changes in credit levels and collateral requirements;
    (4) a procedure for providing customers, upon request, a written
explanation for any change in credit levels or collateral
requirements;
    (5) a reasonable opportunity to contest determinations of credit
levels or collateral requirements; and
    (6) a reasonable opportunity to post additional collateral,
including curing any non-creditworthy determination.

[FR Doc. E7-3636 Filed 3-14-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 177 (Friday, September 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54699-54700]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21739]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2485-065]

FirstLight Hydro Generating Company; Notice of Application
Accepted for Filing, Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Application for Temporary Amendment of
Minimum and Maximum Reservoir Elevation Requirement.
    b. Project No.: 2485-065.
    c. Date Filed: August 8, 2014.
    d. Applicant: FirstLight Hydro Generating Company (Firstlight).
    e. Name of Project: Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Project.
    f. Location: The project is located on the east side of the
Connecticut River, in the towns of Northfield and Erving, in Franklin
County, Massachusetts.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. John Howard, Director of FERC Compliance,
FirstLight Hydro Generating Company, 99 Millers Falls Road, Northfield,
MA 01360. Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Mr. Christopher Chaney,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, protests,
and recommendations is 30 days from the issuance date of this notice by
the Commission. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing.
Please file motions to intervene, protests, comments, or
recommendations using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief
comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the
eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You
must include your name and contact information at the end of your
comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. Please include the project number (P-2485-065) on
any comments, motions to intervene, protests, or recommendations filed.
    k. Description of Request: FirstLight is seeking temporary
authorization to modify the upper reservoir's upper and lower water
surface elevation limits from 1000.5 and 938 feet, to 1004.5 and 920
feet, respectively. FirstLight proposes to use the additional storage
capacity between December 1, 2014, and March 31, 2014. According to
FirstLight approval of changes in the water surface elevations would
result in an increase in the maximum daily generation from 8,475
megawatt-hours (MWh) to 10,645 MWh.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the document (i.e. P-2485). You
may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-
208-3676 or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call (202) 502-
8659. A copy is also available for inspection and reproduction at the
address in item (h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filing must (1)
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or
``MOTION TO INTERVENE'' as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise
comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, motions to intervene, or protests must set forth their
evidentiary basis and otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR
4.34(b). All comments, motions to intervene, or protests should relate
to project works which are the subject of the license surrender.
Agencies may obtain copies of the application directly from the
applicant. A copy of any protest or motion to intervene must be served
upon each representative of the applicant specified in the particular
application. If an intervener files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency. A copy of all other
filings in reference to this application must be accompanied by proof
of service on all persons listed in the service list prepared by the
Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and
385.2010.

    Dated: September 4, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-21739 Filed 9-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 3, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26497-26499]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10175]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2016-4271; Airspace Docket No. 16-AGL-6]

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace for the Following
Minnesota Towns; Hutchinson, MN; Jackson, MN; Pipestone, MN; Two
Harbors, MN; and Waseca, MN

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at Hutchinson Municipal Airport-
Butler Field, Hutchinson, MN; Jackson Municipal Airport, Jackson, MN;
Pipestone Municipal Airport, Pipestone, MN; Richard B. Helgeson
Airport, Two Harbors, MN; and Waseca Municipal Airport, Waseca, MN.
Decommissioning of the non-directional radio beacon (NDB), cancellation
of NDB approaches, and implementation of area navigation (RNAV)
procedures have made this action necessary for the safety and
management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the above
airports. This action would also update the geographic coordinates at
Hutchinson Municipal-Butler Field, Jackson Municipal Airport, Pipestone
Municipal Airport, and Richard B. Helgeson Airport, to coincide with
the FAAs aeronautical database.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 17, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2016-
4271; Airspace Docket No. 16-AGL-6, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1-800-
647-5527) is on the ground floor of the building at the above address.
    FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
The Order is also available for inspection at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of
FAA Order 7400.9Z at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part, A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend Class E airspace at Hutchinson Municipal Airport-
Butler Field, Hutchinson, MN; Jackson Municipal Airport, Jackson, MN;
Pipestone Municipal Airport, Pipestone, MN; Richard B. Helgeson
Airport, Two Harbors, MN; and Waseca Municipal Airport, Waseca, MN.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2016-4271/
Airspace Docket No. 16-AGL-6.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Federal Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

Availability and Summary of Documents Proposed for Incorporation by
Reference

    This document would amend FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015, and effective September 15,
2015. FAA Order 7400.9Z is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.9Z lists Class A, B,
C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and reporting
points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by modifying Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.6-mile radius of
Hutchinson Municipal Airport-Butler Field, Hutchinson, MN; within a
6.3-mile radius of Jackson Municipal Airport, Jackson, MN; within a
6.5-mile radius of Pipestone Municipal Airport, Pipestone, MN; within a
7-mile radius of Richard B. Helgeson Airport, Two Harbors, MN; and
within a 6.3-mile radius of Waseca Municipal Airport, Waseca, MN.
Airspace reconfiguration is necessary due to the decommissioning of
non-directional radio beacons (NDB), cancellation of NDB approaches,
and implementation of area navigation (RNAV) procedures at the above
airports. Controlled airspace is necessary for the safety and
management of the standard instrument approach procedures for IFR
operations at the airports. Geographic coordinates would be adjusted
for the following airports: Hutchinson Municipal-Butler Field, Jackson
Municipal Airport, Pipestone Municipal Airport, and Richard B. Helgeson
Airport, to coincide with the FAAs aeronautical database.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.9Z, dated August 6, 2015, and effective September 15,
2015, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015, and
effective September 15, 2015, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth

* * * * *

AGL MN E5 Hutchinson, MN [Amended]

Hutchinson Municipal Airport-Butler Field, MN
    (Lat. 44[deg]51'36'' N., long. 94[deg]22'57'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.6-mile radius of the Hutchinson Municipal Airport-Butler
Field.
* * * * *

AGL MN E5 Jackson, MN [Amended]

Jackson Municipal Airport, MN
    (Lat. 43[deg]39'01'' N., long. 94[deg]59'12'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.3-mile radius of Jackson Municipal Airport.
* * * * *

AGL MN E5 Pipestone, MN [Amended]

Pipestone Municipal Airport, MN
    (Lat. 43[deg]58'56'' N., long. 96[deg]18'02'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of Pipestone Municipal Airport.
* * * * *

AGL MN E5 Two Harbors, MN [Amended]

Richard B. Helgeson Airport, MN
    (Lat. 47[deg]02'57'' N., long. 91[deg]44'43'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7-mile radius of Richard B. Helgeson Airport.
* * * * *

AGL MN E5 Waseca, MN [Amended]

Waseca Municipal Airport, MN
    (Lat. 44[deg]04'24'' N., long. 93[deg]33'11'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.3-mile radius of the Waseca Municipal Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 19, 2016.
Walter Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2016-10175 Filed 5-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73315-73316]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26012]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2022-N-1129]

Jennings Ryan Staley: Final Debarment Order

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing an order
under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) debarring
Jennings Ryan Staley for a period of 5 years from importing or offering
for import any drug into the United States. FDA bases this order on a
finding that Mr. Staley was convicted of one felony count under Federal
law for Importation Contrary to Law. The factual basis supporting Mr.
Staley's conviction, as described below, is conduct relating to the
importation into the United States of a drug or controlled substance.
Mr. Staley was given notice of the proposed debarment and was given an
opportunity to request a hearing to show why he should not be debarred.
Mr. Staley provided notice to FDA that he acquiesced to the debarment;
FDA received that notice on October 6, 2022. As such, his debarment
commenced on the date FDA was notified of acquiescence.

DATES: This order is applicable October 6, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit applications for termination of debarment to the
Dockets Management Staff, Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or at
www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaime Espinosa, Division of
Enforcement (ELEM-4144), Office of Strategic Planning and Operational
Policy, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Food and Drug Administration,
12420 Parklawn Dr., Rockville, MD 20857,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or at
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Section 306(b)(1)(D) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(b)(1)(D))
permits debarment of an individual from importing or offering for
import any drug into the United States if FDA finds, as required by
section 306(b)(3)(C) of the FD&C Act, that the individual has been
convicted of a felony for conduct relating to the importation into the
United States of any drug or controlled substance.
    On May 27, 2022, Mr. Staley was convicted, as defined in section
306(l)(1) of FD&C Act, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of California, when the court accepted his plea of guilty and
entered judgment against him for the offense Importation Contrary to
Law, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 545 and 2. FDA's finding that debarment
is appropriate is based on the felony conviction referenced herein. The
factual basis for this conviction is as follows: As contained in the
Plea Agreement in Mr. Staley's case, filed July 16, 2021, as a licensed
medical doctor and the proprietor of Skinny Beach Med Spa, Mr. Staley
sold ``treatment packs'' for COVID-19 to members of the public in March
and April 2020 in Southern California. Mr. Staley marketed these
treatment packs by making statements about the efficacy of the drugs
the packs included. For example, Mr. Staley told an undercover agent
from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, who posed as a prospective
patient, that hydroxychloroquine and mefloquine would cure COVID-19
``one hundred percent'' and would provide at least 6 weeks of immunity.
Mr. Staley also stated that hydroxychloroquine was a ``magic bullet,''
an ``amazing weapon,'' ``almost too good to be true,'' an ``amazing
cure,'' and a ``miracle cure'' for COVID-19.
    To obtain hydroxychloroquine for use in his COVID-19 treatment
packs, Mr. Staley contacted merchants in China who could purportedly
supply bulk quantities of the drug, including one merchant who could
supposedly import kilogram quantities of hydroxychloroquine powder. In
Mr. Staley's correspondence with this merchant, he agreed that the
merchant would deliberately mislabel the shipment of hydroxychloroquine
powder as ``yam extract'' to fool U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) agents and ensure that the shipment would not be rejected or
delayed. In Mr. Staley's plea agreement, he admitted that by
mislabeling what he believed to be 12 kilograms of hydroxychloroquine
powder as yam extract in violation of 18 U.S.C. 541, he knowingly and
willfully intended to deceive CBP and cause the importation of
merchandise into the United States upon a false classification of its
quality or value. It is immaterial under 18 U.S.C. 541 that the
shipment ultimately contained baking soda rather than
hydroxychloroquine.
    As a result of this conviction, FDA sent Mr. Staley, by certified
mail, on September 8, 2022, a notice proposing to debar him for a 5-
year period from importing or offering for import any drug into the
United States. The proposal was based on a finding under section
306(b)(3)(C) of the FD&C Act that Mr. Staley's felony conviction under
Federal law for Importation Contrary to Law, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
545 and 2, was for conduct relating to the importation into the United
States of a drug or controlled substance because, in order to defraud
CBP, he knowingly and willfully intended to cause the mislabeling and
importation of 12 kilograms of what Mr. Staley believed to be
hydroxychloroquine powder upon a false classification of its quality or
value in violation of 18 U.S.C. 541.
    In proposing a debarment period, FDA weighed the considerations set
forth in section 306(c)(3) of the FD&C Act that it considered
applicable to Mr. Staley's offense and concluded that the offense
warranted the imposition of a 5-year period of debarment.
    The proposal informed Mr. Staley of the proposed debarment and
offered him an opportunity to request a hearing, providing him 30 days
from the date of receipt of the letter in which to file the request,
and advised him that failure to request a hearing constituted a waiver
of the opportunity for a hearing and of any contentions concerning this
action. Mr. Staley received the proposal and notice of opportunity for
a hearing. Through his attorney, Mr. Staley sent a memorandum to FDA,
dated September 26, 2022, wherein he stated that he acquiesced to the
proposed debarment. FDA received the memorandum on October 6, 2022. In
accordance with section 306(c)(2)(B) of the FD&C Act, Mr. Staley's
period of debarment shall commence on the date FDA received notice he
acquiesced to the debarment, which was October 6, 2022 (21 CFR part
12).

II. Findings and Order

    Therefore, the Assistant Commissioner, Office of Human and Animal
Food Operations, under section 306(b)(3)(C) of the FD&C Act, under
authority delegated to the Assistant Commissioner, finds that Mr.
Jennings Ryan Staley has been convicted of a felony under Federal law
for conduct relating to the importation into the United States of any
drug or controlled substance. FDA finds that the offense should be
accorded a debarment period of 5 years as provided by section
306(c)(2)(A)(iii) of the FD&C Act.
    As a result of the foregoing finding, Mr. Staley is debarred for a
period of 5 years from importing or offering for import any drug into
the United States, effective October 6, 2022. Pursuant to section
301(cc) of the FD&C Act (21

U.S.C. 331(cc)), the importing or offering for import into the United
States of any drug by, with the assistance of, or at the direction of
Mr. Staley is a prohibited act.
    Any application by Mr. Staley for termination of debarment under
section 306(d)(1) of the FD&C Act should be identified with Docket No.
FDA-2022-N-1129 and sent to the Dockets Management Staff (see
ADDRESSES). The public availability of information in these submissions
is governed by 21 CFR 10.20(j).
    Publicly available submissions will be placed in the docket and
will be viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets
Management Staff (see ADDRESSES) between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 22, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-26012 Filed 11-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: September 2, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 170)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 51252]
[DOCID:fr02se08-13]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-27628; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-025-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company (Type
Certificate Previously Held by Columbia Aircraft Manufacturing) Models
LC40-550FG, LC41-550FG, and LC42-550FG Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes a correction to a proposed airworthiness
directive (AD), which was published in the Federal Register on August
7, 2008 (73 FR 45902), and applies to certain Cessna Aircraft Company
(type certificate previously held by Columbia Aircraft Manufacturing)
(Cessna) Models LC40-550FG, LC41-550FG, and LC42-550FG airplanes. This
document proposed to revise AD 2007-07-06 with a new AD that would
retain the actions currently required in AD 2007-07-06; allow
installing access panels; and change the serial number applicability.
The FAA incorrectly referenced the docket number of this proposed AD as
``FAA-2007-27268'' instead of ``FAA-2007-27628.'' This document
corrects the docket number.

DATES: The comment period ending date of October 6, 2008, remains the
same. The FAA will also address any comments relating to this proposed
AD submitted to Docket No. FAA-2007-27268.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Morfitt, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
WA 98057; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    On August 1, 2008, the FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) to revise AD 2007-07-06 with a new AD that would retain the
actions currently required in AD 2007-07-06; allow installing access
panels; and change the serial number applicability. This NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on August 7, 2008 (73 FR 45902). The
FAA incorrectly referenced the docket number of this proposed AD as
``FAA-2007-27268'' instead of ``FAA-2007-27628.'' This document
corrects the docket number.

Need for the Correction

    This correction is needed to assure that all correspondence related
to this subject is posted in the correct docket.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of August 7, 2008 (73 FR 45902), which
was the subject of FR Doc. E8-18231, is corrected as follows:
    On page 45902, in the third column, in the third line under the
heading DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, replace ``FAA-2007-27268'' with
``FAA-2007-27628.''
    On page 45903, in the second column, in the seventh line under the
heading SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, replace ``FAA-2007-27268'' with
``FAA-2007-27628.''

Sec.  39.13  [Corrected]

    On page 45904, in the third column, in the eighth and ninth lines
under the heading Sec.  39.13 [Amended], replace ``FAA-2007-27268''
with ``FAA-2007-27628.''
    Action is taken herein to correct this reference in the proposed
AD.
    The comment period ending date of October 6, 2008, remains the
same. The FAA will also address any comments relating to this proposed
AD submitted to Docket No. FAA-2007-27268.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 25, 2008.
Brian A. Yanez,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-20200 Filed 8-29-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: May 29, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 104)]
[Notices]
[Page 30962]
[DOCID:fr29my08-100]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1753-DR]

Mississippi; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1753-DR), dated May 8, 2008, and
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 19, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident
period for this disaster is closed effective May 19, 2008.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Numbers
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in
Presidential Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidential Declared
Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and
Households; 97.050, Presidential Declared Disaster Assistance to
Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-12004 Filed 5-28-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P