[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 13, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39991-39994]
[FR Doc No: 2019-16608]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0604; Product Identifier 2019-NM-072-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Dassault Aviation Model MYSTERE FALCON 50, MYSTERE FALCON 900,
and FALCON 900EX airplanes; and Model FALCON 2000 and FALCON 2000EX
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report that the Dassault
maintenance planning document (MPD) of the related Dassault aircraft
maintenance manual (AMM) states that the ``combined service/storage
life'' of the fire extinguisher percussion cartridges is longer than it
should be, and could have a safety impact in case of fire. This
proposed AD would require replacing the fire extinguisher percussion
cartridges with serviceable parts. The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by September
27, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Dassault
Falcon Jet Corporation, Teterboro Airport, P.O. Box 2000, South
Hackensack, NJ 07606; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet http://www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0604; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2019-0604;
Product Identifier 2019-NM-072-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The FAA specifically invites comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. The FAA will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
NPRM because of those comments.
    The FAA will post all comments received, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD
2019-0084, dated April 17, 2019 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for all Dassault Aviation Model MYSTERE
FALCON 50, MYSTERE FALCON 900, and FALCON 900EX airplanes; and Model
FALCON 2000 and FALCON 2000EX airplanes. The MCAI states:

    It was identified that the Dassault Maintenance Planning
Document (MPD) of the related Dassault Aircraft Maintenance Manual
(AMM) for affected aeroplanes mentions that ``combined service/
storage life'' of the affected parts is 12 years, whereas it should
be 10 years. The related technical investigation confirmed that this
could have a safety impact in case of fire. It is expected that
Dassault will update the MPD with the correct value.
    This condition, if not corrected, could prevent extinguishing a
fire, possibly resulting in damage to the aeroplane and injury to
the occupants.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires
replacement of affected parts with serviceable parts.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0604.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to a bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, the FAA
has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD
because the agency evaluated all the relevant information and
determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist
or develop on other products of the same type design.

Proposed Requirements of This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require replacing the fire extinguisher
percussion cartridges with serviceable parts.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 1,013 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 work-hours x $85 per hour = $510...........................          $1,145           $1,655       $1,676,515
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the
Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA-2019-0604; Product Identifier
2019-NM-072-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments by September 27, 2019.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Dassault Aviation Model MYSTERE FALCON
50, MYSTERE FALCON 900, and FALCON 900EX airplanes; and Model FALCON
2000 and FALCON 2000EX airplanes; certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 26, Fire
protection.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report that the Dassault maintenance
planning document (MPD) of the related Dassault aircraft maintenance
manual (AMM) mentions that the ``combined service/storage life'' of
the fire extinguisher percussion cartridges is 12 years, whereas it
should be 10 years, and could have a safety impact in case of fire.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address the total life limit of the
fire extinguisher percussion cartridges, which if not corrected,
could prevent extinguishing a fire and possibly result in damage to
the airplane and injury to occupants.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Definitions

    For the purpose of this AD, the definitions specified in
paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3), and (g)(4) apply to this AD.
    (1) An affected part is a fire extinguisher percussion cartridge
having part number (P/N) 862700-00 or P/N 862710-00.
    (2) Total life is time since the manufacturing date, which
includes both the time installed on an airplane and time in storage.
    (3) A serviceable part is an affected part that has not exceeded
10 years of total life, or a fire extinguisher percussion cartridge
that is not an affected part.
    (4) Group 1 airplanes are those that have an affected part
installed. Group 2 airplanes are those that do not have an affected
part installed.

(h) Total Life Limit Implementation

    For Group 1 airplanes, except as specified in paragraph (j) of
this AD: Before a fire extinguisher percussion cartridge exceeds 10
years of total life, remove the affected part and replace it with a
serviceable part in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (l)(2) of this AD.

(i) Guidance for Replacement Required by Paragraph (h) of This AD

    Guidance for the replacement specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD can be found in the applicable Dassault AMM task as specified in
figure 1 to paragraph (i) of this AD.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13AU19.001

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13AU19.002

(j) Grace Period for Initial Replacement

    For Group 1 airplanes: For a fire extinguisher percussion
cartridge that, on the effective date of this AD, has a total life
of 9 years 6 months or more, the replacement required by paragraph
(h) of this AD can be deferred up to 6 months after the effective
date of this AD.

(k) Parts Installation Limitations

    For Group 1 and Group 2 airplanes: As of the effective date of
this AD, no person may install, on any airplane, a fire extinguisher
percussion cartridge, unless the part is a serviceable part as
specified in this AD, and that, following installation, the affected
part is replaced as required by paragraph (h) of this AD.

(l) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (m)(2) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA); or Dassault Aviation's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(m) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA AD 2019-0084, dated April 17, 2019, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2019-0604.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Dassault Falcon Jet Corporation, Teterboro Airport, P.O. Box 2000,
South Hackensack, NJ 07606; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet http://www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on July 26, 2019.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-16608 Filed 8-12-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 215 (Monday, November 7, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78161-78163]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26794]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2016-N-3586]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Focus Groups About Drug Products as Used by the Food
and Drug Administration

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on the information collection
resulting from focus groups about drug products as used by FDA.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by January 6, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to http://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2016-N-3586 for ``Agency Information Collection Activities;
Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Focus Groups About Drug Products
as Used by the Food and Drug Administration.'' Received comments will
be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as
``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets Management between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A63, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Focus Groups About Drug Products as Used by the Food and Drug
Administration, OMB Control Number 0910-0677--Extension

    Focus groups provide an important role in gathering information
because they allow for a more indepth understanding of individuals'
attitudes, beliefs, motivations, and feelings than do quantitative
studies. Focus groups serve the narrowly defined need for direct and
informal opinion on a specific topic and as a qualitative research tool
have three major purposes:
     To obtain information that is useful for developing
variables and measures for quantitative studies;
     to better understand people's attitudes and emotions in
response to topics and concepts;
     and to further explore findings obtained from quantitative
studies.
    FDA will use focus group findings to test and refine its ideas and
to help develop messages and other communications, but will generally
conduct further research before making important decisions such as
adopting new policies and allocating or redirecting significant
resources to support these policies.
    FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of the
Commissioner, and any other Centers or Offices conducting focus groups
about regulated drug products may need to conduct focus groups on a
variety of subjects related to consumer, patient, or health care
professional perceptions and use of drug products and related
materials, including but not limited to, direct-to-consumer
prescription drug promotion, physician labeling of prescription drugs,
Medication Guides, over-the-counter drug labeling, emerging risk
communications, patient labeling, online sales of medical products, and
consumer and professional education.
    Annually, FDA projects about 20 focus group studies using 160 focus
groups with an average of 9 persons per group, and lasting an average
of 1.75 hours each. FDA is requesting this burden for unplanned focus
groups so as not to restrict the Agency's ability to gather information
on public sentiment for its proposals in its regulatory and
communications programs.
    FDA estimates the burden of this information collection as follows:

                                                     Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of
                  Information collection activity                       Number of      responses per     Total annual    Average burden    Total hours
                                                                       respondents       respondent       responses       per response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Focus Groups About Drug Products...................................           1,440                1            1,440             1.75            2,520
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    Dated: November 1, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-26794 Filed 11-4-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on November 24, 2003

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST 1999-6366

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  AEROVIAS de MEXICO, S.A. de C.V.
                       Date Filed:  November 6, 2003

Relief requested:  Exemption from 49 USC section 41301 to permit the
applicant to continue to conduct scheduled, combination service between
Cozumel, Mexico, and Atlanta, Georgia.

If renewal, date and citation of last action:  November 13, 2002, in
this Docket.

Applicant representative:  William C. Evans,<PHONE_NUMBER>        DOT
analyst:  Allen F. Brown,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  None.

	DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved.			       			                       Action date:
November 24, 2003

Effective dates of authority granted:  November 24, 2003, through
November 24, 2004.

Basis for approval:  United States-Mexico Air Transport Services
Agreement

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the
terms, conditions, and limitations indicated: Standard exemption
conditions.

Special conditions/Remarks:

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) the applicant was qualified to perform its proposed
operations; (3) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (4) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted/deferred/dismissed, we denied all requests in
the referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 61 (Thursday, April 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17146-17147]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06715]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-10021-37-OP]

Request for Nominations of Candidates to the EPA's Clean Air
Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) invites
nominations of scientific experts from a diverse range of disciplines
to be considered for appointment to the Clean Air Scientific Advisory
Committee (CASAC).

DATES: Nominations should be submitted in time to arrive no later than
May 3, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about the CASAC
membership appointment process and schedule, please contact Mr. Aaron
Yeow, DFO, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background: The CASAC is a chartered Federal Advisory Committee,
established pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977,
codified at 42 U.S.C. 7409(d)(2), to provide advice, information and
recommendations to the EPA Administrator on the scientific and
technical aspects of air quality criteria and National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS). Members of the CASAC constitute a
distinguished body of non-EPA scientists and engineers who are
nationally and internationally recognized experts in their respective
fields. Members are appointed by the EPA Administrator and serve as
Special Government Employees who provide independent expert advice to
the agency.
    Expertise Sought for CASAC: The CASAC was established pursuant to
the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977, codified at 42 U.S.C.
7409(d)(2), to review air quality criteria and NAAQS and recommend to
the EPA Administrator any new NAAQS and revisions of existing criteria
and NAAQS as may be appropriate. The CASAC shall also: Advise the EPA
Administrator of areas in which additional knowledge is required to
appraise the adequacy and basis of existing, new, or revised NAAQS;
describe the research efforts necessary to provide the required
information; advise the EPA Administrator on the relative contribution
to air pollution concentrations of natural as well as anthropogenic
activity; and advise the EPA Administrator of any adverse public
health, welfare, social, economic, or energy effects which may result
from various strategies for attainment and maintenance of such NAAQS.
As required under the CAA section 109(d), the CASAC is composed of
seven members, with at least one member of the National Academy of
Sciences, one physician, and one person representing state air
pollution control agencies. The SAB Staff Office is seeking nominations
of experts to serve on the CASAC with

expertise in: Air quality, biostatistics, ecology, environmental
engineering, epidemiology, exposure assessment, medicine, risk
assessment, and toxicology. The SAB Staff Office is especially
interested in scientists with expertise described above who have
knowledge and experience relating to criteria pollutants (carbon
monoxide, lead, nitrogen oxides, ozone, particulate matter, and sulfur
oxides). For further information about the CASAC membership appointment
process and schedule, please contact Mr. Aaron Yeow, DFO, by telephone
at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Selection Criteria for the CASAC

    Nominees are selected based on their individual qualifications.
Curriculum vitae should reflect the following:

--Demonstrated scientific credentials and disciplinary expertise in
relevant fields;
--Willingness to commit time to the committee and demonstrated ability
to work constructively and effectively on committees; and
--Background and experiences that would help members contribute to the
diversity of perspectives on the committee, e.g., geographical,
economic, social, cultural, educational backgrounds, professional
affiliations; and other considerations.
--For the committee as a whole, consideration of the collective breadth
and depth of scientific expertise; and a balance of scientific
perspectives is important.

    As the committee undertakes specific advisory activities, the SAB
Staff Office will consider two additional criteria for each new
activity: Absence of financial conflicts of interest and absence of an
appearance of a loss of impartiality.
    How to Submit Nominations: Any interested person or organization
may nominate qualified persons to be considered for appointment to this
advisory committee. Individuals may self-nominate. Nominations should
be submitted in electronic format (preferred) using the online
nomination form under the ``Nomination of Experts'' category at the
bottom of the CASAC home page at http://www.epa.gov/casac. To be
considered, all nominations should include the information requested
below. EPA values and welcomes diversity. All qualified candidates are
encouraged to apply regardless of sex, race, disability or ethnicity.
    The following information should be provided on the nomination
form: Contact information for the person making the nomination; contact
information for the nominee; the disciplinary and specific areas of
expertise of the nominee; the nominee's curriculum vitae; and a
biographical sketch of the nominee indicating current position,
educational background; research activities; sources of research
funding for the last two years; and recent service on other national
advisory committees or national professional organizations. To help the
agency evaluate the effectiveness of its outreach efforts, please
indicate how you learned of this nomination opportunity. Persons having
questions about the nomination process or the public comment process
described below, or who are unable to submit nominations through the
CASAC website, should contact the DFO, as identified above. The DFO
will acknowledge receipt of nominations and will invite the nominee to
provide any additional information that the nominee feels would be
useful in considering the nomination, such as availability to
participate as a member of the committee; how the nominee's background,
skills and experience would contribute to the diversity of the
committee; and any questions the nominee has regarding membership. The
names and biosketches of qualified nominees identified by respondents
to this Federal Register notice, and additional experts identified by
the SAB Staff Office, will be posted in a List of Candidates on the
CASAC website at http://www.epa.gov/casac. Public comments on each List
of Candidates will be accepted for 21 days from the date the list is
posted. The public will be requested to provide relevant information or
other documentation on nominees that the SAB Staff Office should
consider in evaluating candidates.
    Candidates may be asked to submit the ``Confidential Financial
Disclosure Form for Special Government Employees Serving on Federal
Advisory Committees at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency'' (EPA
Form 3110-48). This confidential form is required for Special
Government Employees (SGEs) and allows EPA to determine whether there
is a statutory conflict between that person's public responsibilities
as an SGE and private interests and activities, or the appearance of a
loss of impartiality, as defined by Federal regulation. The form may be
viewed and downloaded through the ``Ethics Requirements for Advisors''
link on the CASAC home page at http://www.epa.gov/casac. This form
should not be submitted as part of a nomination.

Thomas Brennan,
Director, EPA Science Advisory Staff Office.
[FR Doc. 2021-06715 Filed 3-31-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: September 11, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 175)]
[Notices]
[Page 53433]
[DOCID:fr11se06-60]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-312-157]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Negotiated Rate Filing

September 5, 2006.
    Take notice that on August 30, 2006, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
(Tennessee) tendered for filing the following agreements and requests
that the Commission approve the filing effective on the commencement
date of the Shippers' FT-A Service Agreements:
    (1) A gas transportation agreement between Tennessee and Anadarko
Petroleum Corporation (Anadarko) pursuant to Tennessee's Rate Schedule
FT-A dated August 28, 2006;
    (2) A negotiated rate letter agreement between Tennessee and
Anadarko dated February 3, 2006;
    (3) A gas transportation agreement between Tennessee and Devon
Energy Production Company, L.P. (Devon) pursuant to Tennessee's Rate
Schedule FT-A dated August 28, 2006;
    (4) A negotiated rate letter agreement between Tennessee and Devon
dated February 3, 2006;
    (5) A gas transportation agreement between Tennessee and Dominion
Exploration and Production Company, Inc. (Dominion) pursuant to
Tennessee's Rate Schedule FT-A dated August 28, 2006;
    (6) A negotiated rate letter agreement between Tennessee and
Dominion dated February 3, 2006;
    (7) A gas transportation agreement between Tennessee and Hydro Gulf
of Mexico, L.L.C. (Hydro) pursuant to Tennessee's Rate Schedule FT-A
dated August 28, 2006;
    (8) A negotiated rate letter agreement between Tennessee and Hydro
dated February 3, 2006;
    (9) A gas transportation agreement between Tennessee and Kerr-McGee
Oil and Gas Corporation (Kerr-McGee) pursuant to Tennessee's Rate
Schedule FT-A dated August 28, 2006; and
    (10) A negotiated rate letter agreement between Tennessee and Kerr-
McGee dated February 3, 2006.
    Tennessee submits the gas transportation agreements and negotiated
rate letter agreements to seek Commission approval of negotiated rate
arrangements between Tennessee and Anadarko, Devon, Dominion, Hydro,
and Kerr-McGee, respectively. Additionally, Tennessee submits the gas
transportation agreements between Tennessee and Anadarko, Devon,
Dominion, Hydro, and Kerr-McGee, respectively, because the gas
transportation agreements contain provisions that deviate from
Tennessee's pro forma Firm Transportation Agreement. Tennessee is
therefore submitting the agreements for Commission review and approval.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-14979 Filed 9-8-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: July 7, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 130)]
[Notices]
[Page 38472-38473]
[DOCID:fr07jy08-126]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Extension of Existing Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 17a-10, OMB Control No. 3235-0122, SEC File No. 270-154.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing collection of
information provided for in the following rule: Rule 17a-10--Report on
revenue and expenses (17 CFR 240.17a-10) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (``Exchange Act''). The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection of information to the Office
of Management and Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
    Paragraph (a)(1) of Rule 17a-10 generally requires brokers and
dealers that are exempted from the requirement to file monthly and
quarterly reports pursuant to paragraph (a) of Exchange Act Rule 17a-5
(17 CFR 240.17a-5) to file with the Commission the Facing Page, a
Statement of Income (Loss), and balance sheet from Part IIA of Form X-
17A-5 \1\ (17 CFR 249.617), and Schedule I of Form X-17A-5 not later
than 17 business days after the end of each calendar year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Form X-17A-5 is the Financial and Operational Combined
Uniform Single Report (``FOCUS Report''), which is used by brokers
and dealers to provide certain required information to the
Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 17a-10 requires a broker or dealer subject
to Rule 17a-5(a) to submit Schedule I of

Form X-17A-5 with its Form X-17A-5 for the calendar quarter ending
December 31 of each year.
    Paragraph (b) of Rule 17a-10 provides that the provisions of
paragraph (a) do not apply to members of national securities exchanges
or registered national securities associations that maintain records
containing the information required by Form X-17A-5 and which transmit
to the Commission copies of the records pursuant to a plan which has
been declared effective by the Commission.
    The primary purpose of Rule 17a-10 is to obtain the economic and
statistical data necessary for an ongoing analysis of the securities
industry.
    As originally adopted in 1968, Rule 17a-10 required brokers and
dealers to provide their revenue and expense data on a special form.
The Rule was amended in 1977 to eliminate the form. The data previously
reported on the form is now reported using Form X-17A-5 and its
supplementary schedules.
    The Commission estimates that approximately 500 broker-dealers will
spend an average of approximately 12 hours per year complying with Rule
17a-10. Thus, the total compliance burden is estimated to be
approximately 6,000 burden-hours per year.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    Comments should be directed to R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an e-
mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: June 26, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-15199 Filed 7-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 64 (Thursday, April 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18749-18750]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07523]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

Aclor International, Inc., Acrongenomics, Inc., Diversified
Global Holdings Group, Inc., FutureIT, Inc., Southern Star Energy,
Inc., and W Holding Co., Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

April 1, 2014.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Aclor International, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports
since it filed a Form 10 registration statement on December 1, 2011.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Acrongenomics, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since
the period ended June 30, 2011.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Diversified Global Holdings Group, Inc. because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2011.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
FutureIT, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the
period ended September 30, 2009.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Southern Star Energy, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended November 30, 2009.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
W Holding Co., Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since
the period ended September 30, 2009.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed companies.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the
above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT
on April 1, 2014, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 14, 2014.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-07523 Filed 4-1-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: August 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 150)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 47252-47254]
[DOCID:fr05au10-27]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0688; Airspace Docket No. 09-AGL-23]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Establishment of Low Altitude Area Navigation Routes (T-
281, T-283, T-285, T-286, and T-288); Nebraska and South Dakota

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish five low altitude Area
Navigation (RNAV) routes, designated T-281, T-283, T-285, T-286, and T-
288, over Nebraska and South Dakota; controlled by Denver Air Route
Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) and Minneapolis ARTCC. T-routes are low
altitude Air Traffic Service routes, based on RNAV, for use by aircraft
that have instrument flight rules (IFR) approved Global Positioning
System (GPS)/Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) equipment. This
action would enhance safety and improve the efficient use of the
navigable airspace within Denver and Minneapolis ARTCC airspace.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 20, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2010-
0688 and Airspace Docket No. 09-AGL-23 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Airspace and Rules
Group, Office of System Operations Airspace and AIM, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2010-0688 and Airspace Docket No. 09-AGL-23) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to FAA Docket No. FAA-2010-0688 and Airspace Docket No. 09-AGL-23.''
The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://
www.faa.gov, or the Federal Register's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/
air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. An
informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at
the office of the Central Service Center, Air Traffic Organization,
Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRM's should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

Background

    The Manager, Denver ARTCC, has proposed the establishment of five
RNAV routes, from Denver ARTCC airspace into Minneapolis ARTCC
airspace. Currently, there are no established airways to allow aircraft
to navigate between the sites identified in the proposed routes. The
pilot's only options are to either fly Visual Flight Rules (VFR), VFR-
On-Top, or file a flight plan with an altitude high enough for air
traffic control to maintain radar surveillance and communication
frequency coverage; unless they fly many miles out of their way to use
established airways. The Minimum Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) Altitude
(MIA) in these areas is between 4,000 feet mean sea level (MSL) and
7,000 feet MSL. The radio coverage is very good at the low altitudes
between these points, but the radar surveillance coverage is not
reliable below 11,000 feet MSL. In the winter months, these routes
would be especially important because the pilots encounter icing at the
higher altitudes and need to descend, sometimes below radar
surveillance coverage.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to establish five low altitude RNAV routes
within Denver and Minneapolis ARTCC airspace. The routes, designated as
T-281, T-283, T-285, T-286, and T-288, would be depicted on the
appropriate IFR En Route Low Altitude charts and would only be intended
for use by GPS/GNSS equipped aircraft. This action is proposed to
enhance safety and to facilitate the efficient use of navigable
airspace for en route IFR operations within Denver and Minneapolis
ARTCC airspace.
    Low altitude RNAV routes are published in paragraph 6011 of FAA
Order 7400.9T signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The low altitude
RNAV routes listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under Department of

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since
this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified that this proposed rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes low altitude Area Navigation routes (T-routes) over
Nebraska and South Dakota in Denver and Minneapolis ARTCC airspace.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures,'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order
7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 27,
2009 and effective September 15, 2009, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6011--Area Navigation Routes.

* * * * *

T-281 YOZLE, NE to Pierre, SD [New]
YOZLE, NE                                  Fix                                       (Lat. 41[deg]01'33'' N.,
                                                                                long. 99[deg]39'06'' W.)
BOKKI, NE                                  Fix                                       (Lat. 41[deg]39'55'' N.,
                                                                                long. 99[deg]52'17'' W.)
Ainsworth, NE (ANW)                        VOR/DME                                   (Lat. 42[deg]34'09'' N.,
                                                                                long. 99[deg]59'23'' W.)
LKOTA, SD                                  WP (New)                                  (Lat. 43[deg]15'28'' N.,
                                                                                long. 100[deg]03'14'' W.)
Pierre, SD (PIR)                           VORTAC                                    (Lat. 44[deg]23'40'' N.,
                                                                                long. 100[deg]09'46'' W.)

                                                  * * * * * * *
T-283 Scottsbluff, NE to Pierre, SD [New]
Scottsbluff, NE (BFF)                      VORTAC                                    (Lat. 41[deg]53'39'' N.,
                                                                                long. 103[deg]28'55'' W.)
Gordon, NE (GRN)                           NDB                                       (Lat. 42[deg]48'04'' N.,
                                                                                long. 102[deg]10'46'' W.)
WNDED, SD                                  WP (New)                                  (Lat. 43[deg]19'14'' N.,
                                                                                long. 101[deg]32'19'' W.)
Pierre, SD (PIR)                           VORTAC                                    (Lat. 44[deg]23'40'' N.,
                                                                                long. 100[deg]09'46'' W.)

                                                  * * * * * * *
T-285 North Platte, NE to Huron, SD [New]
North Platte, NE (LBF)                     VORTAC                                    (Lat. 41[deg]02'55'' N.,
                                                                                long. 100[deg]44'50'' W.)
Thedford, NE (TDD)                         VOR/DME                                   (Lat. 41[deg]58'54'' N.,
                                                                                long. 100[deg]43'09'' W.)
MARSS, NE                                  Fix                                       (Lat. 42[deg]27'49'' N.,
                                                                                long. 100[deg]36'15'' W.)
Valentine, NE (VTN)                        NDB                                       (Lat. 42[deg]51'42'' N.,
                                                                                long. 100[deg]32'59'' W.)
LKOTA, SD                                  WP (New)                                  (Lat. 43[deg]15'28'' N.,
                                                                                long. 100[deg]03'14'' W.)
Winner, SD (ISD)                           VOR                                       (Lat. 43[deg]29'16'' N.,
                                                                                long. 99[deg]45'41'' W.)
Huron, SD (HON)                            VORTAC                                    (Lat. 44[deg]26'24'' N.,
                                                                                long. 98[deg]18'40'' W.)

                                                  * * * * * * *
T-286 Rapid City, SD to Grand Island, NE [New]
Rapid City, SD (RAP)                       VORTAC                                    (Lat. 43[deg]58'34'' N.,
                                                                                long. 103[deg]00'44'' W.)
Gordon, NE (GRN)                           NDB                                       (Lat. 42[deg]48'04'' N.,
                                                                                long. 102[deg]10'46'' W.)
EFFEX, NE                                  WP (New)                                  (Lat. 42[deg]19'59'' N.,
                                                                                long. 101[deg]20'11'' W.)
Thedford, NE (TDD)                         VOR/DME                                   (Lat. 41[deg]58'54'' N.,
                                                                                long. 100[deg]43'09'' W.)
BOKKI, NE                                  Fix                                       (Lat. 41[deg]39'55'' N.,
                                                                                long. 99[deg]52'17'' W.)
Grand Island, NE (GRI)                     VORTAC                                    (Lat. 40[deg]59'03'' N.,
                                                                                long. 98[deg]18'53'' W.)

                                                  * * * * * * *
T-288 Rapid City, SD to Wolback, NE [New]
Rapid City, SD (RAP)                       VORTAC                                    (Lat. 43[deg]58'34'' N.,
                                                                                long. 103[deg]00'44'' W.)
WNDED, SD                                  WP (New)                                  (Lat. 43[deg]19'14'' N.,
                                                                                long. 101[deg]32'19'' W.)
Valentine, NE (VTN)                        NDB                                       (Lat. 42[deg]51'42'' N.,
                                                                                long. 100[deg]32'59'' W.)
Ainsworth, NE (ANW)                        VOR/DME                                   (Lat. 42[deg]34'09'' N.,
                                                                                long. 99[deg]59'23'' W.)
FESNT, NE                                  WP (New)                                  (Lat. 42[deg]03'57'' N.,
                                                                                long. 99[deg]17'18'' W.)
Wolback, NE (OBH)                          VORTAC                                    (Lat. 41[deg]22'33'' N.,
                                                                                long. 98[deg]21'13'' W.)

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 27, 2010.
Edith V. Parish,
Manager, Airspace and Rules Group.
[FR Doc. 2010-19270 Filed 8-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1373-1374]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00265]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC23-2-000]

Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-923); Comment
Request; Extension

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of information collection and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or
FERC) is soliciting public comment on the requirements and burden of
the information collection FERC-923 (Communication of Operational
Information between Natural Gas Pipelines and Electric Transmission
Operators), described below, which will be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review. The Commission published a 60-
day notice on October 27, 2022 in the Federal Register and received no
comments.

DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due February 9,
2023.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments on FERC-923 (identified by Docket No.
IC23-2-000) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) through
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission Desk Officer. Please identify the OMB Control Number 1902-
0265 (Mandatory Reliability Standard: Transmission Vegetation
Management) in the subject line. Your comments should be sent within 30
days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Please submit copies of your comments (identified by Docket No.
IC23-2-000 and FERC-923) to the Commission as noted below. Electronic
filing through https://www.ferc.gov is preferred.
     Electronic Filing: Documents must be filed in acceptable
native applications and print-to-PDF, but not in scanned or picture
format.
     For those unable to file electronically, comments may be
filed by USPS mail or by hand (including courier) delivery:
    [ssquf] Mail via U.S. Postal Service only, addressed to: Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    [ssquf] Hand (including courier) delivery to: Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Please reference the specific collection number(s) (FERC-923) and/
or title(s) (Communication of Operational Information between Natural
Gas Pipelines and Electric Transmission Operators) in your comments.
    Instructions: OMB submissions must be formatted and filed in
accordance with submission guidelines at: www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Using the search function under the ``Currently Under Review
field,'' select ``Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,'' click
``submit,'' and select ``comment'' to the right of the subject
collection. FERC submissions must be formatted and filed in accordance
with submission guidelines at: https://www.ferc.gov. For user
assistance, contact FERC Online Support by email at
[email protected], or by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll-free).
    Docket: Users interested in receiving automatic notification of
activity in this docket or in viewing/downloading comments and
issuances in this docket may do so at https://www.ferc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Ellen Brown may be reached by email
at [email protected] and telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: FERC-923, Communication of Operational Information between
Natural Gas Pipelines and Electric Transmission Operators.
    OMB Control No.: 1902-0265.
    Type of Request: Three-year extension of the information collection
requirements described below with no changes to the current reporting
requirements.
    Abstract: In 2013, the Commission revised its regulations to
provide explicit authority to interstate natural gas pipelines and
public utilities that own, operate, or control facilities used for the
transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce to voluntarily
share non-public, operational information with each other for the
purpose of promoting reliable service and operational planning on
either the pipeline's or public utility's system. This helped ensure
the reliability of natural gas pipeline and public utility transmission
services by permitting transmission operators to share with each other
the information that they deem necessary to promote the reliability and
integrity of their systems. FERC removed actual or perceived
prohibitions to the information sharing and communications between
industry entities. The information shared is not submitted to FERC.
Rather, the non-public information is shared voluntarily between
industry entities. FERC does not prescribe the content, medium, format,
or frequency for the information sharing and communications. Those
decisions are made by the industry entities, depending on their needs
and the situation.
    Type of Respondent: Natural gas pipelines and public utilities.

    Estimate of Annual Burden: \1\ The Commission estimates the annual
public reporting burden and cost \2\ for FERC-923 as:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Burden is defined as the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a federal agency. See 5
CFR 1320 for additional information on the definition of information
collection burden.
    \2\ Commission staff estimates that the industry's skill set
(wages and benefits) for FERC-923 is comparable to the Commission's
skill set. The FERC 2022 average salary plus benefits for one FERC
full-time equivalent (FTE) is $188,992 year (or $91 per hour
[rounded]).

                  FERC-923--Communication of Operational Information Between Natural Gas Pipelines and Electric Transmission Operators
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Annual  number                                              Total annual burden
                                          Number of     of  responses   Total number     Average burden hrs. &     hrs. & total annual       Cost per
                                         respondents   per respondent   of responses    cost ($) per  response           cost ($)         respondent ($)
                                                  (1)             (2)     (1) * (2) =  (4).....................  (3) * (4) = (5)........       (5) / (1)
                                                                                (3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Utility Transmission Operator,         \3\ 155              12           1,860  0.5 hrs.; $45.50........  930 hrs.; $84,630......             546
 communications.
Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines,             \4\ 191              12           2,292  0.5 hrs.; $45.50........  1,146 hrs.; $104,286...             546
 communications.
                                      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total............................  ..............  ..............           4,152  ........................  2,076 hrs.; $188,916...  ..............
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comments: Comments are invited on: (1) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden and
cost of the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information collection; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The estimate for the number of respondents is based on the
North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Compliance
Registry as of October 12, 2022, minus the Transmission Operators
within ERCOT.
    \4\ The estimate is based on the number of respondents to the
2021 FERC Forms 2 and 2A (Major and Non-major Natural Gas Pipeline
Annual Reports).

    Dated: January 4, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-00265 Filed 1-9-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 219 (Thursday, November 12, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71846-71848]
[FR Doc No: 2020-23551]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0122; FRL-10014-19-Region 9]

Air Plan Approval; California; Butte County; El Dorado County;
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District; San Diego County;
Ventura County

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve revisions to the Butte County Air Quality Management
District (BCAQMD), El Dorado County Air Quality Management District
(EDCAQMD), Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD), San
Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD) and Ventura
County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) portions of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern
rules that include definitions for certain terms that are necessary for
the implementation of local rules that regulate sources of air
pollution. We are approving the definitions rules under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This rule will be effective on December 14, 2020.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0122. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information. If you need assistance in a
language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities
who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone:<PHONE_NUMBER> or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On July 6, 2020 (85 FR 40156), the EPA proposed to approve the five
amended rules listed in Table 1 as revisions to the California SIP.
With respect to BCAQMD Rule 102, we determined that the State had not
provided sufficient public process documentation to provide the basis
for a rescission of the rule from the applicable SIP, but we recognized
that, because the remaining definitions in BCAQMD Rule 102 had been
moved to BCAQMD Rule 101 and because we are approving BCAQMD Rule 101,
there is no reason to retain BCAQMD Rule 102 in the applicable SIP.

                                            Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Amended/
          Local agency              Rule No.        Rule title       Rescinded        revised        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BCAQMD.........................             101  Definitions....  ..............      12/14/2017   \1\ 5/23/2018
BCAQMD.........................             102  Definitions....  \2\ 12/14/2017  ..............   \3\ 5/23/2018
EDCAQMD........................             101  General          ..............       6/20/2017        8/9/2017
                                                  Provisions and
                                                  Definitions.
MDAQMD.........................             102  Definition of    ..............       1/28/2019   \4\ 8/19/2019
                                                  Terms.

SDCAPCD........................               2  Definitions....  ..............       7/11/2017      11/13/2017
VCAPCD.........................               2  Definitions....  ..............        4/9/2019   \5\ 8/19/2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they
comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action and
related technical support documents (TSDs) contain more information on
the rules and our evaluation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ CARB submitted the amendment to BCAQMD Rule 101
electronically on May 23, 2018. CARB's submittal letter is dated May
18, 2018.
    \2\ The BCAQMD amended Rule 101 on this date but took no action
on Rule 102. The date is from Enclosure A to CARB Executive Order S-
18-004, May 18, 2018, which is included in CARB's May 23, 2018 SIP
submittal.
    \3\ CARB submitted the rescission of BCAQMD Rule 102
electronically on May 23, 2018. CARB's submittal letter is dated May
18, 2018.
    \4\ CARB submitted the amendment to MDAQMD Rule 102
electronically on August 19, 2019. CARB's submittal letter is dated
August 16, 2019.
    \5\ CARB submitted the amendment to VCAPCD Rule 2 electronically
on August 19, 2019. CARB's submittal letter is dated August 16,
2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received a comment letter from a member of the
public who expressed support for the proposed rulemaking.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rules
as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in
section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving these rules
into the California SIP. Our final action includes regulatory text in
40 CFR 52.220 that incorporates by reference the amended rules listed
in Table 1 above, and identifies the previously approved rules that are
being superseded in the California SIP by the approval of the amended
rules. We are also including regulatory text that specifically
identifies the remaining definitions in BCAQMD Rule 102
(``Definitions'') that were superseded by our approval in 2015 of
BCAQMD Rule 300 (``Open Burning Requirements, Prohibitions and
Exemptions'') \6\ and the remaining definitions that are being
superseded by today's approval of amended BCAQMD Rule 101.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ We approved BCAQMD Rule 300 at 80 FR 38966 (July 8, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
BCAQMD's, the EDAQMD's, the MDAQMD's, the SDCAPCD's and the VCAPCD's
rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below.
The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United

States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 11,
2021. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the
effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged
later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.

    Dated: October 16, 2020.
John Busterud,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends, part 52,
Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(168)(i)(A)(11)
and (12), (c)(280)(i)(B)(3), (c)(404)(i)(C)(3), (c)(457)(i)(C)(7),
(c)(488)(i)(A)(5), (c)(503)(i)(C), (c)(516)(i)(B), (c)(518)(i)(B),
(c)(520)(i)(A)(2) and (c)(542) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan-in part.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (168) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (11) Previously approved on February 3, 1987 in paragraph
(c)(168)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
paragraph (c)(423)(i)(G)(1), Rule 102 ``Definitions'': the definitions
for ``approved ignition devices,'' ``open out-door fire'', ``permissive
burn day'' and ``range improvement burning.''
    (12) Previously approved on February 3, 1987 in paragraph
(c)(168)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
paragraph (c)(518)(i)(B)(1), Rule 102 ``Definitions'': the definitions
for ``submerged fill pipe'' and ``vapor recovery system''.
* * * * *
    (280) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) * * *
    (3) Previously approved on October 10, 2001 in paragraph
(c)(280)(i)(B)(2) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
paragraph (c)(503)(i)(C)(1), Rule 101, adopted on February 15, 2000.
* * * * *
    (404) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) * * *
    (3) Previously approved on December 7, 2012 in paragraph
(c)(404)(i)(C)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
paragraph (c)(542)(i)(B)(1), Rule 2, ``Definitions,'' revised on
October 22, 1968, as revised through April 12, 2011.
* * * * *
    (457) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) * * *
    (7) Previously approved on June 11, 2015 in paragraph
(c)(457)(i)(C)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
paragraph (c)(518)(i)(B)(1), Rule 101, ``Definitions,'' amended on
April 24, 2014.
* * * * *
    (488) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (5) Previously approved on June 21, 2017 in paragraph
(c)(488)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
(c)(516)(i)(B)(1), Regulation 1, Rule 2, ``Definitions,'' Rev. Adopted
and Effective on June 30, 1999, Table 1--Exempt Compounds: Rev. and
Effective on June 14, 2016.
* * * * *
    (503) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) El Dorado County Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 101, ``General Provisions and Definitions,'' amended on
June 20, 2017.
    (2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
    (516) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) San Diego County Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Rule 2, ``Definitions,'' amended on July 11, 2017.
    (2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
    (518) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) Butte County Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 101, ``Definitions,'' amended on December 14, 2017.
    (2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
    (520) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (2) Previously approved on July 2, 2019 in paragraph
(c)(520)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
paragraph (c)(542)(i)(A)(1), Rule 102, ``Definition of Terms,'' amended
on April 23, 2018.
* * * * *
    (542) New regulations for the following APCDs were submitted on
August 19, 2019 by the Governor's designee as an attachment to a letter
dated August 16, 2019.
    (i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Mojave Desert Air Quality
Management District.
    (1) Rule 102, ``Definition of Terms,'' amended on January 28, 2019.
    (2) [Reserved]
    (B) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Rule 2, ``Definitions,'' as amended through April 9, 2019.
    (2) [Reserved]
    (ii) [Reserved]

[FR Doc. 2020-23551 Filed 11-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P