[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 9, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69634-69636]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28850]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0978]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Temporary Change for Recurring Fireworks Display
Within the Fifth Coast Guard District, Wrightsville Beach, NC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is temporarily changing the enforcement period
and location of safety zone regulations for a recurring fireworks
display within the Fifth Coast Guard District. These regulations apply
to only one recurring fireworks display event that takes place at
Wrightsville Beach, NC. Safety zone regulations are necessary to
provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during the event.
This action is intended to restrict vessel traffic in a portion of
Motts Channel and Banks Channel near Wrightsville Beach, NC, during the
event.

DATES: This rule is effective from 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. on November
26, 2011, except that amendatory instruction 2a suspending entry (d)10
in Sec.  165.506, Table to Sec.  165.506, is effective November 20,
2011 through November 26, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0978 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0978 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email Chief Warrant Officer Joseph Edge,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard Sector North Carolina, Atlantic
Beach, NC; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because publishing an NPRM is impracticable
and contrary to public interest since immediate action is needed to
minimize potential danger to the public during the event. The Coast
Guard did not receive notification of date change for this event in
sufficient time to issue an NPRM and hold a comment period for this
rulemaking. The potential dangers posed by fallout from pyrotechnic
fireworks displays to vessel traffic transiting the waterway makes this
safety zone necessary to provide for the safety of spectator craft and
other vessels transiting the event area. For the safety concerns noted,
it is in the public interest to have these regulations in effect during
the event. The Coast Guard will issue broadcast notice to mariners to
advise vessel operators of navigational restrictions. On scene Coast
Guard and local law enforcement vessels will also provide actual notice
to mariners.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), and for the same reasons, the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the
effective date would be contrary to the public interest, since
immediate action is needed to ensure the safety of the event
participants, spectator craft and other vessels transiting the event
area.

Background and Purpose

    Fireworks display events are frequently held on or adjacent to
navigable waters within the boundary of the Fifth Coast Guard District.
For a description of the geographical area of each Coast Guard Sector--
Captain of the Port Zone, please see 33 CFR 3.25.
    This regulation temporarily changes the enforcement period and
geographic location of the safety zone for one recurring marine event,
described at (d)(10) of the Table to 33 CFR 165.506, that is normally
scheduled to occur each year on the 4th Monday in November. This year,
the event will take place on the 4th Saturday, November 26, 2011.
    On November 26, 2011, the North Carolina Holiday Flotilla at
Wrightsville Beach, NC, will sponsor the ``2011 NC Holiday Flotilla
boat parade and fireworks''. The event will take place near
Wrightsville Beach, NC, on the waters of Motts Channel and Banks
Channel. The regulation at 33 CFR 165.506 is enforced annually for this
event. The event will consist of approximately 40 sailboats and
powerboats participating in a parade in the vicinity of the
Wrightsville Beach, NC, and conclude with a fireworks display. Also, a
fleet of spectator vessels is expected to gather near the event site to
view the parade and fireworks. To provide for the safety of
participants, spectators, and transiting vessels, the Coast Guard will
temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the event area from 5:30 p.m. to
8:30 p.m. on November 26, 2011. The regulation at 33 CFR 165.506 will
be enforced for the duration of the event. Vessels may not enter the
regulated area unless they receive permission from the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander.

Discussion of Rule

    The Coast Guard is temporarily changing the enforcement period and
geographic location of the safety zone for this recurring event within
the Fifth Coast Guard District. This regulation applies to only one
marine event listed at (d)10 in the Table to Sec.  165.506.
    The Table to Sec.  165.506, event (d)10 establishes the enforcement
date and geographic location for the ``North Carolina Holiday
Flotilla''. This regulation temporarily changes the enforcement date
from the fourth Monday in November to Saturday, November 26, 2011 and
the location to latitude 34[deg]12'19'' N, longitude 077[deg]48'16'' W.
The temporary safety zone will be enforced from 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
on November 26, 2011, and will restrict general navigation in the
regulated area during the event. The North Carolina Holiday Flotilla,
which is the sponsor for this event, holds this event annually;
however, they have changed the date of the event for 2011 so that it is
outside the scope of the existing enforcement period. Except for
participants and vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, no person or vessel will be allowed to enter or remain in
the regulated area. These regulations are needed to control vessel
traffic during the event to enhance the safety of participants,
spectators and transiting vessels.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order or under section
1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
    Although this rule prevents traffic from transiting a portion of
Motts Channel and Banks Channel during the specified event, the effect
of this regulation will not be significant due to the limited duration
that the regulated area will be in effect and the extensive advance
notifications that will be made to the maritime community via marine
information broadcasts, local radio stations and area newspapers so
mariners can adjust their plans accordingly. Additionally, this
rulemaking does not change the permanent regulated areas that have been
published in 33 CFR 165.506, Table to Sec.  165.506. In some cases
vessel traffic may be able to transit the regulated area when the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander deems it is safe to do so.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule would affect the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending
to transit or anchor in Motts Channel or Banks Channel where this event
is being held. This regulation will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities because it will be enforced only
during the event that will be patrolled by the Coast Guard patrol
commander. The Captain of the Port will ensure that small entities are
able to operate in the areas where events are occurring when it is safe
to do so. In some cases, vessels will be able to safely transit around
the regulated area at various times, and, with the permission of the
Patrol Commander, vessels may transit through the regulated area.
Before the enforcement period, the Coast Guard will issue maritime
advisories so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-(888) 734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, as supplemented by
Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a

Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule establishes a safety zone. An
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.

0
2. Amend Sec.  165.506 as follows:
0
a. From November 20, 2011 through November 26, 2011 in Sec.  165.506,
Table to Sec.  165.506, suspend entry (d)10.
0
b. From 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. on November 26, 2011, in Sec.  165.506,
Table to Sec.  165.506, add entry (d)(14) to read as follows:

Sec.  165.506  Safety Zones; Fifth Coast Guard District Fireworks
Displays.

* * * * *
    (d) Enforcement period. * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       No.                   Date                      Location                       Regulated area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
14..............  November 26, 2011.........  Motts Channel, Banks       All waters of Motts Channel within a
                                               Channel, Wrightsville      300 yard radius of latitude
                                               Beach, NC, Safety Zone.    34[deg]12'19'' N, longitude
                                                                          077[deg]48'16'' W, a position located
                                                                          on the east end of Bird Island,
                                                                          Wrightsville Beach, NC.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

    Dated: October 20, 2011.
Anthony Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2011-28850 Filed 11-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


FIFRA SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY PANEL

OPEN MEETING

FEBRUARY 27-28, 2007

FIFRA SAP WEB SITE   HYPERLINK "http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/"
http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/

OPP Docket Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Docket Number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0987

REVIEW THE STATUS OF THE IN UTERO THROUGH LACTATIONAL ASSAY IN THE
ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR SCREENING PROGRAM

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Conference Center - Lobby Level

One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.)

2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington,VA  22202

FIFRA SAP Chair:

Steven G. Heeringa, Ph.D.

Research Scientist and Director for Statistical Design

University of Michigan Institute for Social Research

P.O. Box 1248

Ann Arbor, MI  48106-1248

Designated Federal Official:

William Wooge

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Science Coordination and Policy

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel

EPA East Building

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20460

Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

  HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Members:

John R. Bucher, Ph.D., D.A.B.T.

Deputy Director

Environmental Toxicology Program, NIEHS

111 T. W. Alexander Drive

P.O. Box 12233, Mail Drop EC-34

Research Triangle Park, NC  27709

Janice Elaine Chambers, Ph.D.

William L. Giles Distinguished Professor

Director, Center for Environmental Health Sciences

College of Veterinary Medicine

Mississippi State University

P.O. Box 6100

Mississippi State, MS  39762-6100

Stuart Handwerger, M.D.

Professor of Pediatrics

University of Cincinnati

  Children's Hospital Medical Center

3333 Burnet Avenue

Cincinnati, OH  45229-3039

Gary E. Isom, Ph.D.

Professor of Toxicology

School of Pharmacy & Pharmacal Sciences

Purdue University

575 Stadium Mall Drive

West Lafayette, IN  47907-2091

Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D.

Professor, Aquatic Toxicology

Department of Environmental Sciences

2207 Geology

University of California, Riverside

Riverside, California  92521

FQPA Science Review Board Members:

J. Charles Eldridge, Ph.D.

Professor of Physiology & Pharmacology

Wake Forest University School of Medicine

Winston-Salem, NC  27157-1083

Penelope A. Fenner-Crisp, Ph.D.

2871 Southern Hills Drive

North Garden, VA  22959-1843

Paul Foster, M.D.

Leader, Integrated Toxicology Group, and

Deputy Director, NTP Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human
Reproduction

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

PO Box 12233 (MD EC-34)

Research Triangle Park, NC  27709

Carlos Sonnenschein, M.D.

Tufts University School of Medicine

Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology

136 Harrison Avenue

Boston, MA  02111-1800


                 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                         WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

                                                	OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND
                                                           POLLUTION PREVENTION

MEMORANDUM

Date: 	April 20, 2016

SUBJECT:	Florasulam: Tier I (Scoping) Review of Human Incidents and Epidemiology

PC Code: 129108
DP Barcode: D433025
Decision No.: 512706
Registration No.: NA
Petition No.: NA
Regulatory Action: NA
Risk Assessment Type: NA
Case No.: NA
TXR No.: NA
CAS No.: 145701-23-1
MRID No.: NA
40 CFR: NA
		              									Ver.Apr.08

FROM:	Shanna Recore, Industrial Hygienist
		Toxicology and Epidemiology Branch
		Health Effect Division (7509P)
			and
      Elizabeth Evans, Environmental Protection Specialist
		Toxicology and Epidemiology Branch
		Health Effects Division (7509P)

THROUGH:	David Miller, Acting Branch Chief
		Toxicology and Epidemiology Branch
		Health Effects Division (7509P)

TO: 		Sheila Piper, Risk Assessor
		Risk Assessment Branch VI
		Health Effects Division (7509P)
			and
		M. Appleyard, Chemical Review Manager
		Risk Management & Implementation Branch 5
		Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P)

Summary and Conclusions

Based on the low frequency and severity of incident cases reported for florasulam in both IDS and SENSOR-Pesticides there does not appear to be a concern at this time that would warrant further investigation.  The Agency will continue to monitor the incident information and if a concern is triggered, additional analysis will be included in the risk assessment.

Detailed Review

      I.	ACTION REQUESTED

This review is intended to fulfill our requirement to docket summaries of incident data that were reported to the Agency, as well as to ensure human incident data and the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) are part of the problem formulation phase of registration review. Reports of adverse health effects allegedly due to a specific pesticide exposure (i.e., an "incident") are largely self-reported and therefore, generally speaking, neither exposure to a pesticide or reported symptom (or the connection between the two) is validated or otherwise confirmed.  Typically, causation cannot be determined based on incident data.  However, incident information can be an important source of feedback to the Agency:  incidents of severe outcome, or a suggested pattern or trend among less severe incidents, can signal the Agency to further investigate a particular chemical or product. Observational epidemiology studies relate the risk of disease, e.g., cancer, and exposure to an agent such as a pesticide product in the general population or specific sub-groups like pesticide applicators.

	II.	BACKGROUND

Florasulam is a selective triazolopyrimidine sulfonanilide post-emergent herbicide registered for use on various crops including beans, corn, chickpeas, lentils, and cereal grains including wheat, barley, oats, rye, and triticale.
For this evaluation, both the OPP Incident Data System (IDS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (CDC/NIOSH) Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risk-Pesticides (SENSOR) databases were consulted for pesticide incident data on the active ingredient florasulam (pc code: 129108).  The purpose of the database search is to identify potential patterns in the frequency and severity of the health effects attributed to florasulam exposure.  Florasulam is not included in the AHS, and therefore this study does not provide information for this report.

 RESULTS/DISCUSSION

 IDS (Incident Data System)

OPP's IDS includes reports of alleged human health incidents from various sources, including mandatory Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 6(a)(2) reports from registrants, other federal and state health and environmental agencies, and individual consumers. Since 1992, OPP has compiled these reports in IDS.  IDS contains reports from across the U.S. and most incidents have all relevant product information recorded. Reports submitted to the IDS represent anecdotal reports or allegations only, unless otherwise stated in the report.

IDS records incidents in one of two modules: Main IDS and Aggregate IDS:

 Main IDS contains incidents resulting in higher severity outcomes and provides more detail with regard to case specifics.  This system stores incident data for death, major and moderate incidents, and it includes information about the location, date and nature of the incident.  Main IDS incidents involving only one active ingredient (as opposed to pesticide products with multiple active ingredients) are considered to provide more certain information about the potential effects of exposure from the pesticide.

 Aggregate IDS contains incidents resulting in less severe human incidents (minor, unknown, or no effects outcomes). These are reported by registrants only as counts in what are aggregate summaries.

For the Main IDS, from January 1, 2010 to November 17, 2015, there were no incidents reported for the single chemical florasulam only in the database.  There was one incident reported involving more than one chemical besides florasulam. This incident was classified as moderate severity.

Aggregate IDS, from January 1, 2010 to November 17, 2015, there were 15 incidents reported involving florasulam.  These incidents were classified as minor severity. Overall, there are few incidents reported to IDS involving florasulam.

 SENSOR-Pesticides

The SENSOR-Pesticides database covers 12 states from 1998-2012, although reporting varies from state to state. Cases of pesticide-related illnesses are ascertained from a variety of sources, including: reports from local Poison Control Centers, state Department of Labor workers' compensation claims when reported by physicians, reports from State Departments of Agriculture, and physician reports to state Departments of Health. Although both occupational and non-occupational incidents are included in the database, SENSOR-Pesticides focuses on occupational pesticide incidents, and is of particular value in providing that information.  The state coordinator at each of the 12 respective state Departments of Health conducts case follow-up activities such as obtaining medical records to verify symptoms and severity.  Using standardized protocol and case definitions derived from poison center reporting, the state SENSOR-Pesticide coordinator enters the incident information into the state-based system which is sent to NIOSH annually to be aggregated.

A review of SENSOR-Pesticides 1998-2012 identifies no incidents involving florasulam.

 Agricultural Health Study (AHS)

The AHS is a high quality, prospective epidemiology study evaluating the link between pesticide use and various health outcomes including cancer. The AHS includes private and commercial pesticide applicators and their spouses. If there are AHS findings relevant to a particular pesticide going through registration review, the Agency will ensure they are considered in the problem formulation/scoping phase of the process and, if appropriate, fully reviewed in the risk assessment phase of the process. The AHS includes information on use of 80 different pesticide active ingredients commonly used in agriculture.  Florasulam is not included in the AHS, and therefore this study does not provide information for this report.

 CONCLUSION

Based on the low frequency and severity of incident cases reported for florasulam in both IDS and SENSOR-Pesticides there does not appear to be a concern at this time that would warrant further investigation.  The Agency will continue to monitor the incident information and if a concern is triggered, additional analysis will be included in the risk assessment.


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 183 (Friday, September 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 53099]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20711]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4534-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

Idaho; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Idaho (FEMA-4534-DR), dated April 9, 2020, and related
determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued August 5, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
dated April 9, 2020 for the State of Idaho is hereby amended to include
the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

    All areas within the State of Idaho are eligible for assistance
under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-20711 Filed 9-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 24933]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09780]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2016-55]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; Trumbull
Unmanned LLC

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of Title 14 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. The purpose of this notice is to improve the public's
awareness of, and participation in, the FAA's exemption process.
Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of
information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of
the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before May 17, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2014-0890
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Ngo,<PHONE_NUMBER> 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591. This notice is published
pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 21, 2016.
James M. Crotty,
Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2014-0890.
    Petitioner: Trumbull Unmanned LLC.
    Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: 61.113 (a) and (b); 91.109; 91.119
(c); 91.121; 91.151 (a); 91.405 (a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409 (a)(2);
91.417 (a) and (b).
    Description of Relief Sought: The petitioner is requesting an
amendment to Exemption No. 11146 for relief in order to operate UAS
from a moving vehicle and to operate the Lockheed Martin Stalker XE UAS
powered by a hybrid power system utilizing a solid oxide propane fuel
cell.

[FR Doc. 2016-09780 Filed 4-26-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 61590-61591]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24349]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers

33 CFR Part 328

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 110, 112 116, 117, 122, 230, 232, 300, 302, and 401

[EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0880; FRL-9917-90-OW]
RIN 2040-AF30

Extension of Comment Period for the Definition of ``Waters of the
United States'' Under the Clean Water Act Proposed Rule and Notice of
Availability

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), Department of the Army,
Department of Defense; and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) are extending the comment period for
the proposed rule ``Definition of `Waters of the United States' Under
the Clean

Water Act'' published on April 21, 2014. The agencies are extending the
comment period in response to stakeholder requests for an extension and
to allow comments on new supporting materials.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 14, 2014. The
comment period was scheduled to end on October 20, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket identification
(ID) No. EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0880, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Mail: Water Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
Code 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Attention: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0880.
     Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, EPA West Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20004, Attention: Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0880. Such deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket Center's normal hours of operation. Special arrangements should
be made for deliveries of boxed information by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2011-
0880. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or email. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means the EPA will not know
your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body
of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA
without going through www.regulations.gov your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with
any disc you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, the
EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should
avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be
free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about the
EPA's public docket visit the Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available (e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute). Certain other materials,
such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Office of Water Docket Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744; the telephone number for the Office of Water Docket Center is
(202) 566-2426.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Donna Downing, Office of Water
(4502-T), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Ms. Stacey Jensen, Regulatory Community of
Practice (CECW-CO-R), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 441 G Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20314; telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 21, 2014, EPA published the
proposed rule ``Definition of `Waters of the United States' Under the
Clean Water Act'' in the Federal Register (79 FR 22188). The previous
comment deadline was October 20, 2014. The EPA and Corps have received
requests for an extension to the comment deadline for this proposed
rule.
    This action extends the comment period until November 14, 2014.
Note that additional information is available in the public docket,
EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0880, since publication of the April 21, 2014 proposed
rule and a subsequent notice extending the public comment period (June
24, 2014; 79 FR 35712). The agencies also expect additional relevant
materials from the Science Advisory Board before October 20, 2014, and
will immediately place those materials in the docket when they become
available. The agencies will publish a notice of availability at that
time.

    Dated: October 3, 2014.
Kenneth J. Kopocis,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency.
    Dated: October 6, 2014.

Jo-Ellen Darcy,
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), Department of the Army.
[FR Doc. 2014-24349 Filed 10-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P