[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 19, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16823-16824]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06303]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0147; Airspace Docket No. 13-AWP-1]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Tuba City, AZ

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace at the Tuba
City VHF Omni-Directional Radio Range Tactical Air Navigational Aid
(VORTAC), Tuba City, AZ to facilitate vectoring of Instrument Flight
Rules (IFR) aircraft under control of Denver, Albuquerque and Salt Lake
City Air Route Traffic Control Centers (ARTCCs). The FAA is proposing
this action to enhance the safety and management of aircraft operations
within the National Airspace System.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 3, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2013-
0147; Airspace Docket No. 13-AWP-1, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA 2013-0147 and Airspace Docket No. 13-AWP-1) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2013-0147 and Airspace Docket No. 13-AWP-1''. The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRM's

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRM's should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by establishing Class E en route domestic
airspace extending

upward from 1,200 feet above the surface at the Tuba City VORTAC, Tuba
City, AZ. This action would contain aircraft while in IFR conditions
under control of Denver, Albuquerque and Salt Lake City ARTCCs by
vectoring aircraft from en route airspace to terminal areas.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6006, of
FAA Order 7400.9W, dated August 8, 2012, and effective September 15,
2012, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in this Order.
    The FAA has determined this proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation; (1) Is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since
this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified this proposed rule, when
promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes
the authority for the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would establish controlled airspace at Tuba City VORTAC, Tuba
City, AZ.
    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9W, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2012, and effective September 15,
2012 is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6006 En route domestic airspace areas.

* * * * *

ANM AZ E6 Tuba City, AZ [New]

Tuba City VORTAC, AZ
    (Lat. 36[deg]07'17'' N., long. 111[deg]16'11'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface
within an area bounded by lat. 39[deg]37'44'' N., long.
111[deg]07'28'' W.; to lat. 39[deg]26'10'' N., long. 110[deg]01'33''
W.; to lat. 38[deg]36'14'' N., long. 109[deg]28'14'' W.; to lat.
38[deg]35'57'' N., long. 109[deg]02'31'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]28'30''
N., long. 109[deg]03'18'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]04'06'' N., long.
108[deg]53'29'' W.; to lat. 37[deg]48'47'' N., long. 108[deg]54'40''
W.; to lat. 37[deg]37'12'' N., long. 109[deg]18'38'' W.; to lat.
37[deg]36'54'' N., long. 109[deg]35'55'' W.; to lat. 37[deg]04'41''
N., long. 109[deg]38'16'' W.; to lat. 36[deg]57'10'' N., long.
108[deg]55'03'' W.; to lat. 36[deg]36'32'' N., long. 108[deg]55'03''
W.; to lat. 36[deg]20'35'' N., long. 108[deg]47'12'' W.; to lat.
36[deg]05'15'' N., long. 108[deg]22'51'' W.; to lat. 36[deg]14'38''
N., long. 107[deg]40'25'' W.; to lat. 35[deg]39'30'' N., long.
107[deg]25'27'' W.; to lat. 35[deg]11'08'' N., long. 110[deg]03'48''
W.; to lat. 35[deg]16'08'' N., long. 111[deg]55'46'' W.; to lat.
35[deg]24'00'' N., long. 112[deg]00'00'' W.; to lat. 35[deg]46'00''
N., long. 111[deg]50'30'' W.; to lat. 36[deg]25'15'' N., long.
111[deg]30'15'' W.; to lat. 36[deg]44'00'' N., long. 111[deg]36'30''
W.; to lat. 37[deg]24'45'' N., long. 111[deg]52'45'' W.; to lat.
37[deg]30'00'' N., long. 112[deg]03'30'' W.; to lat. 37[deg]50'39''
N., long. 112[deg]24'51'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]10'56'' N., long.
111[deg]24'19'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]28'51'' N., long. 110[deg]38'05''
W.; to lat. 39[deg]03'55'' N., long. 110[deg]37'49'' W.; thence to
the point of beginning.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on March 7, 2013.
Clark Desing,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center
[FR Doc. 2013-06303 Filed 3-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Supplemental Materials Document Title:  Paperwork Reduction Act Submission for 1625-0070 10 pages


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 183 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 58424]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23314]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

China Mobile Media Technology, Inc., Order of Suspension of
Trading

September 18, 2012.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
China Mobile Media Technology, Inc. because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2008.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is ordered,
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that
trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for
the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 18, 2012, through 11:59 p.m.
EDT on October 1, 2012.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-23314 Filed 9-18-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: May 23, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 99)]
[Notices]
[Page 29623-29624]
[DOCID:fr23my06-39]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8173-5; Docket I.D. No. EPA-HQ-ORD-0116]

Harmonization in Interspecies Extrapolation: Use of
BW3/4 as Default Method in Derivation of the Oral RfD

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Peer-Review Teleconference with opportunity for
public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is announcing that Versar, Inc., an EPA contractor for
external scientific peer review, plans to convene an independent panel
of experts and organize and conduct an external peer review meeting to
review the draft document titled, ``Harmonization in Interspecies
Extrapolation: Use of BW3/4 as Default Method in Derivation
of the Oral RfD'' (EPA/630/R-06/001). The peer review meeting is
planned to take place by teleconference. On Februrary 15, 2006, EPA
announced a 60-day public comment period for the draft document (71 FR
7958). The draft document was prepared by the Agency's Risk Assessment
Forum.
    The public comment period and the external peer review are separate
processes that provide opportunities for all interested parties to
comment on the document. In addition to considering public comments
submitted in accordance with the February 15, 2006, announcement of a
public comment period, EPA intends to forward those comments to Versar,
Inc. for the external peer review panel prior to the teleconference.

    EPA is releasing this draft document solely for the purpose of pre-
dissemination peer review under applicable information quality
guidelines. This document has not been formally disseminated by EPA. It
does not represent and should not be construed to represent any Agency
policy or determination.
    The public will be given an opportunity to observe and provide oral
comments at this teleconference by registering with Versar, Inc. (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, below). The draft document and the
charge questions for EPA's external peer review are available primarily
via the Internet on the Risk Assessment Forum's home page under the
External Review Drafts menu at http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/raf/index.cfm.

In preparing a final report, EPA will consider Versar Inc.'s report of
the comments and recommendations from the external peer review meeting
and any public comments that EPA receives in accordance with the
February 15, 2006, notice (71 FR 7958).

DATES: The peer review teleconference will be held on June 14, 2006,
from 9 a.m. to no later than 5 p.m., with a break for lunch. The
teleconference may end earlier than 5 p.m. if less time is needed for
the reviewers to complete their discussion. Time will be provided for
public observers who wish to make comments on the document.

ADDRESSES: The draft ``Harmonization in Interspecies Extrapolation: Use
of BW\3/4\ as Default Method in Derivation of the Oral RfD'' is
available primarily via the Internet on the Risk Assessment Forum's
home page under the External Review Drafts menu at http://cfpub.epa.gov/
 ncea/ raf/index.cfm. A limited number of paper copies

are available from the Technical Information Staff, NCEA-W by
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER> or by facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>. If you are
requesting a paper copy, please provide your name, mailing address, and
the document title, ``Harmonization in Interspecies Extrapolation: Use
of BW3/4 as Default Method in Derivation of the Oral RfD.''
Copies are not available from Versar, Inc.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Members of the public may call into
the teleconference as observers, and there will be a limited time for
comments from the public. In order to participate, you should contact
Mr. Andrew Oravetz of Versar, Inc. at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by phone
at<PHONE_NUMBER> to register. You will be asked for your name,
affiliation, city and state, and contact information. When registering,
please also indicate whether you would like to make a statement during
the call. Time for public comments is limited, and reservations will be
accepted on a first-come, first-served basis. At a time before June 14,
2006, registrants will be given the call-in information for the peer
review teleconference.
    For technical information, please contact Resha M. Putzrath, Risk
Assessment Forum; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>; or
e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Information About the Document

    The Agency endorses a hierarchy of approaches to derive human
equivalent oral exposures from data from laboratory animals, with the
preferred approach being physiologically based toxicokinetic modeling.
Intermediate approaches include using some chemical-specific
information. In lieu of data to support either of these approaches,
body weight scaling to the \3/4\ power (BW3/4) would be
endorsed as a general default procedure to extrapolate toxicologically
equivalent doses of chronic orally administered agents from laboratory
animals to humans for the purposes of deriving an oral Reference Dose
(RfD). Use of BW3/4 in derivation of RfD values would be
parallel with current Agency use in derivation of cancer oral slope
factors. Thus, this paper would harmonize the two main Agency oral
dose-response extrapolation procedures. This generalized default
procedure is viewed as an informed, species-specific, dosimetric
adjustment factor (DAF) that addresses predominantly toxicokinetic and
some toxicodynamic aspects of the interspecies uncertainty factor
UFA. Use of this procedure would result in derivation of a
human equivalent exposure, specifically a human equivalent dose (HED)
that is to be used in derivation of the oral RfD in a manner parallel
to the human equivalent concentration (HEC) in derivation of an
inhalation RfC.

    Dated: May 15, 2006.
George Alapas,
Deputy Director, National Center for Environmental Assessment.
[FR Doc. E6-7836 Filed 5-22-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 176 (Monday, September 12, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 56127-56128]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23191]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0894; Airspace Docket No. 11-AWP-14]

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Mercury, NV

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class E airspace at Mercury,
Desert Rock Airport, Mercury, NV. Decommissioning of the Mercury Non-
Directional Beacon (NDB) at Mercury, Desert Rock Airport has made this
action necessary for the safety and management of Instrument Flight
Rules (IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 27, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2011-
0894; Airspace Docket No. 11-AWP-14, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA 2011-0894 and Airspace Docket No. 11-AWP-14) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2011-0894 and Airspace Docket No. 11-AWP-14.'' The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA
98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by amending Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface for standard instrument approach
procedures at Mercury, Desert Rock Airport, Mercury, NV. Airspace
reconfiguration is necessary due to the decommissioning of the Mercury
NDB and cancellation of the NDB approach. Controlled airspace is
necessary for the safety and management of IFR operations at the
airport.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005, of
FAA Order 7400.9V, dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15,
2011, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in this Order.
    The FAA has determined this proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation; (1) Is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since
this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified this proposed rule, when
promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, section 106, describes
the authority for the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend controlled airspace at Mercury, Desert Rock Airport,
Mercury, NV.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9V, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15,
2011 is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

AWP NV E5 Mercury, NV [Amended]

Mercury, Desert Rock Airport, NV
    (Lat. 36[deg]37[min]10[sec] N., long. 116[deg]01[min]58[sec] W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 4.3-mile radius of the Mercury, Desert Rock Airport. That
airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface within
the area bounded by a line beginning at lat. 36[deg]41[min]00[sec]
N., long. 116[deg]26[min]33[sec] W.; to lat. 36[deg]41[min]00[sec]
N., long. 115[deg]56[min]00[sec] W.; to lat. 36[deg]16[min]00[sec]
N., long. 115[deg]56[min]00[sec] W.; to lat. 36[deg]16[min]00[sec]
N., long. 116[deg]08[min]03[sec] W.; to lat. 36[deg]36[min]00[sec]
N., long. 116[deg]26[min]33[sec] W.; thence to the point of
beginning, excluding the portion within Restricted Area R-4808N.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on August 31, 2011.
Robert Henry,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2011-23191 Filed 9-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 189 (Monday, September 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 51668]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21104]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-87090; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2019-27]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American, LLC; Notice of
Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE American Options
Fee Schedule To Modify the Options Regulatory Fee

September 24, 2019.
    On July 2, 2019, NYSE American, LLC (``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend the
Exchange's fee schedule to modify the amount of its Options Regulatory
Fee. The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing
with the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\3\ The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on July 22, 2019.\4\ The Commission received one comment letter, which
criticized the proposal.\5\ On September August 30, 2019, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission temporarily suspended
the proposed rule change and instituted proceedings under Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act to determine whether to approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change.\6\ On September 16, 2019, the Exchange
withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEAMER-2019-27).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86391 (July 16,
2019), 84 FR 35165.
    \5\ See Letter to Vanessa Countryman, Secretary, Commission,
from Ellen Greene, Managing Director, Securities Industry and
Financial Markets Association, dated August 27, 2019.
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86833, 84 FR 47029
(September 6, 2019).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-21104 Filed 9-27-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


           United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX

                                 Air Division

                          Technical Support Document

                                      for

                      EPA's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

                                   for the

                     California State Implementation Plan

             Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District
                           Rule 130  -  Definitions

                                      AND

               Mendocino County Air Quality Management District
                           Rule 130  -  Definitions

                                Laura Yannayon

                                 March 9, 2011

                               Table of Contents

Section	Page

Introduction	1

PSD Program SIP Revision Submittals	1

Background	1

Rule Summaries	2

Rule Evaluation	2

Section 110(l) of the Act	3

Section 193 of the Act	3

Recommendations	4

Attachments	4

Introduction

      Part C of title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) contains the provisions for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) of air quality in areas designated as "attainment" or "unclassifiable" for the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).  Part D of title I of the Act contains the requirements for areas designated "nonattainment" for any of the NAAQS.  Both parts C and D of the Act require pre-construction permit programs for certain new or modified stationary sources of pollutants.  The requirements under part C, referred to as "PSD New Source Review" (PSD) apply to certain new or modified sources that would be located within attainment  or unclassifiable areas, and apply to all regulated pollutants, except those pollutants for which an area has been designated as "nonattainment."  The requirements under part D, referred to as "Nonattainment NSR," (NSR) apply to certain new or modified sources of nonattainment pollutants in nonattainment areas.  Collectively, the pre-construction permit requirements related to PSD and Nonattainment NSR are commonly referred to simply as "NSR."  Both of these programs apply to "major" stationary sources and "major modifications" as those terms are defined in 40 CFR Part 51, Subpart I.  In addition to the regulation of major stationary sources, states are also required to adopt a program to provide for the regulation of the construction and modification of minor stationary sources and minor modifications at major sources, to assure that the NAAQS are achieved.  These pre-construction requirements are commonly referred to as "minor NSR."

PSD Program SIP Revision Submittals

      Rule 130  - Definitions was adopted by the Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District (NSCAPCD or District) on December 14, 2010.  Rule 130  - Definitions was adopted by the Mendocino County Air Quality Management District (MCAQMD or District) on February 15, 2011.  The California Air Resources Board (ARB) submitted both rules to EPA by a letter dated February 28, 2010.  ARB is the governor's designee for submitting official revisions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) to EPA.  Previous versions of Rule 130 are currently approved into the SIP for both Districts.  For NSCAPCD and MCAQMD, Rule 130 was last approved into the SIP on February 9, 1999 and July 31, 1998, respectively (See 64 FR 6223 and 63 FR 40830).  There are no other pending submittals of these rules.

Background

      Both the NSCAPCD and MCAQMD are currently designated as attainment or unclassifiable for all NAAQS, and are therefore required to adopt and maintain a SIP-approved PSD permit program, CAA Section 161.  In both Districts, a combination of SIP approved rules make up the PSD permit program, including Rules 130  -  Definitions, 200  -  Permit Requirements, 220  -  New Source Review Standards, and 260  -  Exclusions.

      The submitted revisions to Rule 130  -  Definitions are being evaluated together in this TSD because both the existing SIP rules and proposed revisions are very similar.  In each case, the District has revised Rule 130 to provide new and revised definitions in order to ensure consistency with CAA requirements for PSD programs.  The specific changes are discussed below in the Rule Evaluation section of this document.

Rule Summaries

Mendocino Rule 130  -  Definitions
      Rule 130 defines various terms used throughout the District's Regulations.  In particular it provides definitions of several key terms related to the PSD program.  In this revision, the District has added new definitions for the terms Greenhouse Gases, PM10, and PM2.5, and revised the definitions for the terms Precursor, Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Increment, and Significant.  The District also made other minor technical corrections.  The purpose of these changes was to make the terms consistent with the current definitions contained in EPA PSD regulations codified in 40 CFR 51.166.

Northern Sonoma Rule 130  -  Definitions
      Rule 130 defines various terms used throughout the District's Regulations.  In particular it provides definitions of several key terms related to the PSD program.  In this revision, the District has added new definitions for the terms Greenhouse Gases, PM10, and PM2.5, and revised the definitions for the terms Precursor, Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Increment, and Significant.  The District also made other minor technical corrections.  The purpose of these changes was to make the terms consistent with the current definitions contained in EPA PSD regulations codified in 40 CFR 51.166.

Rule Evaluation

      For this TSD, we have reviewed each Rule 130 SIP submittal to ensure the new and revised definitions meet the requirements of section 110 and part C of title I of the Act and implementing regulations at 40 CFR 51.166.  This TSD describes the rule revisions and the reasons for our proposed action on the Rule 130 submittals.  Since both Districts have made identical revisions to their rules, the changes are only discussed once below.  The Act requires all States with attainment or unclassifiable areas to submit a PSD program that contains specific PSD program provisions.  Since the submitted rules only consist of definitions, our evaluation focuses on whether the definitions contain language which is either identical or equivalent to that found in 40 CFR 51.100 and 51.166.

New Definitions
         *          A new definition has been added for Greenhouse Gases (GHG).  This term is defined within the definition of the term "subject to regulation" in 40 CFR 51.166 (b)(48).  The District's definition is equivalent in that it includes the same six gases as EPA's definition of GHGs.

         *          A new definition has been added for PM10, and PM2.5.  These definitions are consistent with the definitions of these NAAQS pollutants found in 40 CFR 51.100(qq), 50.6, 50.7, and 50.13.

Revised Definitions
         *          The current definition for the term Precursor has been revised to specify that VOC and NOx are ozone precursors, and that NOx and SOX are PM2.5 precursors.  These changes make this definition consistent with the precursors identified by the Administrator, within the definition of "regulated NSR pollutant" in 40 CFR 51.166 (b)(49).

         *          The current definition for the term Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Increment has been revised to update the allowable increments for PM10, and add the allowable increments for PM2.5, consistent with the values listed in 40 CFR 51.166(c)  -  Ambient air increments and other measures.

         *          The current definition for the term Significant has been revised to add significant emission rate thresholds for PM2.5 and municipal waste combustors.  These changes make this definition consistent with the definition of "significant," in 40 CFR 51.166 (b)(23).

Summary
      As discussed above, each of the new or revised terms is consistent with the applicable definitions for these terms in 40 CFR 51.100 and 51.166 and part 50.

Section 110(l) of the Act

      Section 110(l) of the Act prohibits EPA from approving any revision of a SIP if the revision would interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other applicable requirement of the Act.  The approval of these rules would strengthen the applicable SIP by adding and updating terms that establish applicability and evaluation criteria for pollutants subject to the PSD program.  The rules do not represent any type of relaxation and therefore would not interfere with attainment and reasonable further progress, and thus are approvable under Section 110(l) of the Act.

Section 193 of the Act

      Section 193 of the Act, which was added by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, only applies to control requirements in nonattainment areas.  Neither the NSCAPCD and MCAQMD are classified nonattainment for any NAAQS; therefore Section 193 does not apply to this rulemaking action.

Recommendations
      Pursuant to section 110(k)(3) of the Act, we recommend full approval of the submitted rules.  We recommend approval of the submitted rules based on our determination that the rules comply with applicable statutory and regulatory provisions, including section 110(a)(2)(C) and part C of title I of the Act.  In support of this recommendation, we have concluded that our approval of Rule 130 (for each District) complies with section 110(l) of the Act because the rules do not represent a relaxation of any current SIP provision.  If we finalize this action as proposed, our approval would be codified through revisions to 40 CFR 52.220 (identification of plan).

Attachments

 1) Submitted NSCAPCD Rule 130 and MCAQMD Rule 130.

 2) SIP Approved NSCAPCD Rule 130 and MCAQMD Rule 130.


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 43616]
[FR Doc No: 2016-15764]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2016-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1548]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations for Carroll County, Iowa and
Incorporated Areas; Withdrawal

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Proposed notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing
its proposed notice concerning proposed flood hazard determinations,
which may include the addition or modification of any Base Flood
Elevation, base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area boundary or zone
designation, or regulatory floodway (herein after referred to as
proposed flood hazard determinations) on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps
and, where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study reports
for Carroll County, Iowa and Incorporated Areas.

DATES: This withdrawal is effective on July 5, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-
1548 to Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal
Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 19, 2016, FEMA published a
proposed notice at 81 FR 2889, proposing flood hazard determinations
for Carroll County, Iowa and Incorporated Areas. FEMA is withdrawing
the proposed notice.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.

    Dated: May 19, 2016.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation, Department
of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016-15764 Filed 7-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61685-61686]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25641]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2594-000.
    Applicants: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation.
    Description: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Rate Schedule PTR to be effective 10/27/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/27/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110927-5088.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2595-000.
    Applicants: Midwestern Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Petition of Midwestern Gas Transmission Company for a
Limited Waiver of Tariff Provisions.
    Filed Date: 09/27/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110927-5137.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2597-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Questar 36601-7 Amendment to Negotiated Rate Agreement
Filing to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110928-5033.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2598-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Virginia Nat Gas 34696-5 Amendment to Negotiated Rate
Agreement Filing to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110928-5034.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2599-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Questar 37657-8, 9 Amendments to Negotiated Rate Agreement
to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110928-5035.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2600-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: HK 37731 to Texla 39107 Capacity Release Negotiated Rate
Agreement Filing to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110928-5036.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2601-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Enbridge 34685 to Texla 39109 Capacity Release Negotiated
Rate Agreement Filing to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110928-5037.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2602-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Enbridge 34685 to Texla 39116 Capacity Release Negotiated
Rate Agreement Filing to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110928-5038.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2603-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Enbridge 34685 to Central Crude 39117 Capacity Release
Negotiated Rate Agreement Filing to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110928-5039.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2604-000.
    Applicants: Big Sandy Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Big Sandy Pipeline, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Negotiated Rate Agreements from Volume 1-A to be effective 9/
28/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110928-5042.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2605-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Rate Schedule ESS and EESWS Reservation
Charge Credits to be effective 11/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110928-5059.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 11, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2606-000.
    Applicants: Big Sandy Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Big Sandy Pipeline, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.602: Cancellation of Original Volume No. 1-A to be effective 9/28/
2011.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110928-5062.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 11, 2011.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, and service can be found at:
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other
information, call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-
8659.

    Dated: September 28, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-25641 Filed 10-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P