[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 208 (Thursday, October 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 66718]
[FR Doc No: 2011-27811]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9483-7]

Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC): Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the
Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC) on November 19, 1990, to
provide independent advice and counsel to EPA on policy issues
associated with implementation of the Clean Air Act of 1990. The
Committee advises on economic, environmental, technical, scientific and
enforcement policy issues.

Dates and Addresses: Open meeting notice; Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. App. 2
Section 10(a)(2), notice is hereby given that the Clean Air Act
Advisory Committee will hold its next open meeting on November 17, 2011
from 8 a.m. to 3:45 p.m. at the Crown Plaza Old Town Alexandria Hotel
located at 901 North Fairfax, Alexandria, VA. Seating will be available
on a first come, first served basis. The Permits, New Source Review and
Toxics Subcommittee and the Multi-Pollutant Sector workgroup will meet
at the same location on November 16, 2011 from 10 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. The
Mobile Source Technical Review subcommittee met on Thursday, October 6,
2011 and will report out at the full committee meeting. The agenda for
the CAAAC full committee meeting on November 17, 2011 will be posted on
the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee Web site at http://www.epa.gov/oar/caaac/.
    Inspection of Committee Documents: The Committee agenda and any
documents prepared for the meeting will be publicly available at the
meeting. Thereafter, these documents, together with CAAAC meeting
minutes, will be available by contacting the Office of Air and
Radiation Docket and requesting information under docket EPA-HQ-OAR-
2004-0075. The Docket office can be reached by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the CAAAC, please contact
Pat Childers, Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. EPA<PHONE_NUMBER>, FAX
(202) 564-1352 or by mail at U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation
(Mail code 6102 A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20004. For information on the Permits, New Source Review and Toxics
subcommittee, please contact Liz Naess at<PHONE_NUMBER>. For
information on the Mobile Source Technical Review subcommittee please
contact Elizabeth Etchells at<PHONE_NUMBER>. Additional Information on
these meetings, CAAAC, and its Subcommittees can be found on the CAAAC
Web site: http://www.epa.gov/oar/caaac/.
    For information on access or services for individuals with
disabilities, please contact Mr. Pat Childers at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>To request accommodation of a disability, please
contact Mr. Childers, preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting,
to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: October 17, 2011.
Pat Childers,
Designated Federal Official, Clean Air Act Advisory Committee, Office
of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2011-27811 Filed 10-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52772-52774]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24568]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Hazardous Materials: Notice of Applications for Special Permits

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Notice of actions on special permit applications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations, notice is hereby given
that the Office of Hazardous Materials Safety has received the
application described herein.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 14, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
20590.
    Comments should refer to the application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of comments is desired, include
a self-addressed stamped postcard showing the special permit number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Paquet, Director, Office of
Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits Division, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
Southeast, Washington, DC 20590-0001,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of the applications are available for
inspection in the Records Center, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue Southeast, Washington, DC, or at http://regulations.gov.
    This notice of receipt of applications for special permit is
published in accordance with part 107 of the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 31, 2017.
Donald Burger,
Chief, General Approvals and Permits Branch.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                         Regulation(s)     Nature of the special
    Application No.             Docket No.             Applicant           affected           permits thereof
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              SPECIAL PERMITS DATA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10784-M................  .......................  United States       175.75(b).........  To modify the special
                                                   Secret Service.                         permit to authorize
                                                                                an additional DOT-
                                                                                specification
                                                                                cylinder to be
                                                                                transported in First
                                                                                Aid/Trauma Kits
                                                                                aboard passenger
                                                                                carrying aircraft.
12130-M................  .......................  FIBA Technologies,  173.318,            To modify the special
                                                   Inc.                176.76(g),          permit to change it
                                                                       173.315.            from a manufacturing
                                                                                permit to a use
                                                                                permit and
                                                                                eliminating the
                                                                                record requirements.
13027-M................  .......................  HERNCO Fabrication  ..................  To modify the special
                                                   & Services, Inc.                        permit to authorize
                                                                                the adding of
                                                                                additional Class 3
                                                                                hazmat.
15806-M................  .......................  Precision Technik,  173.201, 173.202,   To modify the special
                                                   Inc.                173.203, 173.302,   permit to authorize
                                                                       173.304, 180.209.   use of single hatch
                                                                                openings on
                                                                                cylinders, increase
                                                                                the MAWP to 745 psig
                                                                                and decrease the
                                                                                working temperature
                                                                                to 131 degrees.
20274-M................  .......................  SDV (USA) Inc.....  172.300, 172.301,   To authorize the
                                                                       172.400.            transportation in
                                                                                commerce of certain
                                                                                non-DOT specification
                                                                                containers containing
                                                                                certain Division 2.1,
                                                                                2.2, 2.3 liquefied
                                                                                and compressed gases
                                                                                and other hazardous
                                                                                materials for use in
                                                                                specialty cooling
                                                                                applications such as
                                                                                satellites and
                                                                                military aircraft.

20412-N................  .......................  American Railcar    179.7(a)..........  To authorize the
                                                   Industries, Inc.                        transportation in
                                                                                commerce of tanks
                                                                                cars with cast manway
                                                                                covers that have been
                                                                                produced by casting
                                                                                facilities that do
                                                                                not meet the quality
                                                                                assurance program
                                                                                requirements required
                                                                                by AAR MSRP 1002/
                                                                                1003.
20416-N................  .......................  Aluminum Tank &     177.834(h),         To authorize the
                                                   Tank Accessories,   178.700(c)(1).      manufacture, marking,
                                                   Inc.                                    sale and use of non-
                                                                                DOT specification
                                                                                metal refueling tanks
                                                                                containing certain
                                                                                Class 3 liquids.
20459-N................  .......................  C.H.& I.            178.33-1(a),        To authorize the
                                                   Technologies, Inc.  178.33a-1.          manufacture, mark,
                                                                                sale, and use of non-
                                                                                DOT specification
                                                                                receptacles meeting
                                                                                the requirements for
                                                                                2P and 2Q receptacles
                                                                                except as provided
                                                                                herein.
20470-N................  .......................  Audi                172.101(j)........  To authorize the
                                                   Aktiengesellschaf                       transportation in
                                                   t.                                      commerce of lithium
                                                                                ion batteries in
                                                                                excess of 35 kg by
                                                                                cargo-only aircraft.
20474-N................  .......................  Space Exploration   172.300, 172.400,   To authorizes the
                                                   Technologies Corp.  Part 173.           transportation in
                                                                                commerce of the
                                                                                Dragon 2 space
                                                                                capsule and
                                                                                associated support
                                                                                equipment containing
                                                                                non-DOT specification
                                                                                packagings of
                                                                                hazardous materials.
20480-N................  .......................  Carolina Logistics  172.301(c),         To authorize the
                                                   Services, L.L.C.    172.303(a),         transportation in
                                                                       173.185(c)(1)(ii)   commerce of packages
                                                                       ,                   containing lithium
                                                                       173.185(c)(1)(iii   cells and batteries
                                                                       ),                  without certain
                                                                       173.185(c)(1)(iv)   package markings when
                                                                       , 173.185(c)(3).    contained in
                                                                                overpacks and
                                                                                transported via motor
                                                                                vehicle and rail.
20482-N................  .......................  Phosphorus          173.35(e).........  To authorize the
                                                   Derivatives Inc.                        transportation in
                                                                                commerce of residue
                                                                                contained in IBCs
                                                                                where the closure
                                                                                nearest to the
                                                                                hazardous materials
                                                                                cannot be secured.
20498-N................  .......................  Lighting            172.101,            To authorize the
                                                   Resources, LLC.     172.102(c),         manufacture, marking,
                                                                       172.301(c),         sale and use of
                                                                       173.185(a)(1),      specifically designed
                                                                       173.185(c),         packagings for the
                                                                       173.185(d),         transportation in
                                                                       173.22(a).          commerce of certain
                                                                                batteries and cells
                                                                                without shipping
                                                                                papers, and certain
                                                                                marking and labeling
                                                                                when transported for
                                                                                recycling or
                                                                                disposal.
20526-N................  .......................  Space Exploration   173.185(e)........  To authorize the
                                                   Technologies Corp.                      transportation in
                                                                                commerce of lithium
                                                                                batteries by highway
                                                                                that have not been
                                                                                tested.
20530-N................  .......................  French Alternative  172.101(j),         To authorize the
                                                   Energies and        173.185(a).         transportation in
                                                   Atomic Energy                           commerce of prototype
                                                   Commission (CEA).                       lithium ion batteries
                                                                                in excess of 35 kg by
                                                                                cargo-only aircraft.
20532-N................  .......................  Chart Inc.........  172.203(a),         To authorize the
                                                                       177.834(h).         manufacture, mark,
                                                                                sale, and use of DOT
                                                                                4L cylinders for the
                                                                                discharge of
                                                                                refrigerated liquid
                                                                                gases without
                                                                                removing them from
                                                                                the vehicle on which
                                                                                they are transported.
20539-N................  .......................  NHME Inc..........  172.504(a)........  To authorize the
                                                                                transportation in
                                                                                commerce of oxygen
                                                                                without displaying
                                                                                placards.
20544-N................  .......................  General Dynamics--  172.320(a),         Special permit to ship
                                                   OTS, Inc.           173.54(a),          Active Protection
                                                                       173.54(j),          System fuzes to
                                                                       173.56(b),          General Dynamics
                                                                       173.57, 173.58,     Ordnance and Tactical
                                                                       173.60.             Systems.
20548-N................  .......................  Consumer Product    173.22(a)(4)(i),    To authorize the
                                                   Safety              173.22(a)(4)(i)(i   transportation in
                                                   Commission,         i), 173.24(f)(2).   commerce of certain
                                                   United States.                          packages that are not
                                                                                closed in accordance
                                                                                with the packaging
                                                                                manufacturer's
                                                                                closure instructions.
20552-N................  .......................  Crowley Liner       176.905(a)........  To authorize the
                                                   Services, Inc.                          transportation in
                                                                                commerce of vehicles
                                                                                with fuel tanks
                                                                                containing greater
                                                                                than 25% of their
                                                                                capacity by cargo
                                                                                vessel.
20554-N................  .......................  Praxair, Inc......  178.338-11(c).....  To authorize the
                                                                                transportation in
                                                                                commerce of oxygen,
                                                                                refrigerated liquid
                                                                                in MC 338 cargo tanks
                                                                                that are not equipped
                                                                                with an on-vehicle
                                                                                remotely controlled
                                                                                self-closing shutoff
                                                                                valve as required at
                                                                                Sec.   178.338-11(c).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-24568 Filed 11-13-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4901-60-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7023-7024]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02497]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2015-0001; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1463]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report, once effective, will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before May 11, 2015.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location and the respective Community Map Repository address listed in
the tables below. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-1463, to
Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and also are used to calculate the appropriate
flood insurance premium rates for new buildings built after the FIRM
and FIS report become effective.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at http://floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_fact_sheet.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location and
the respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: January 16, 2015.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Community                 Community map repository address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Brown County, Indiana, and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Town of Nashville....................  201 Locust Lane, Nashville, IN
                                        47448.
Unincorporated Areas of Brown County.  201 Locust Lane, Nashville, IN
                                        47448.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Geary County, Kansas, and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Grandview Plaza..............  City Hall, 406 State Street,
                                        Grandview Plaza, KS 66441.
City of Junction City................  Municipal Building, 700 North
                                        Jefferson Street, Junction City,
                                        KS 66441.

City of Milford......................  City Hall, 201 12th Street,
                                        Milford, KS 66514.
Unincorporated Areas of Geary County.  Geary County Municipal Building,
                                        700 North Jefferson Street,
                                        Junction City, KS 66441.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Grand Traverse County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charter Township of East Bay.........  East Bay Charter Township Hall,
                                        1965 Three Mile Road North,
                                        Traverse City, MI 49696.
Charter Township of Garfield.........  Garfield Charter Township Hall,
                                        3848 Veterans Drive, Traverse
                                        City, MI 49684.
City of Traverse City................  City Hall, 400 Boardman Avenue,
                                        Traverse City, MI 49684.
Township of Acme.....................  Acme Township Hall, 6042 Acme
                                        Road, Williamsburg, MI 49690.
Township of Blair....................  Blair Township Hall, 2121 County
                                        Road 633, Grawn, MI 49637.
Township of Green Lake...............  Green Lake Township Hall, 9394
                                        10th Street, Interlochen, MI
                                        49643.
Township of Long Lake................  Long Lake Township Hall, 8870
                                        North Long Lake Road, Traverse
                                        City, MI 49685.
Township of Paradise.................  Paradise Township Hall, 2300 East
                                        M113, Kingsley, MI 49649.
Township of Peninsula................  Peninsula Township Hall, 13235
                                        Center Road, Traverse City, MI
                                        49686.
Township of Union....................  Union Township Hall, 5020 Fife
                                        Lake Road, Fife Lake, MI 49633.
Township of Whitewater...............  Whitewater Township Hall, 5777
                                        Vinton Road, Williamsburg, MI
                                        49690.
Village of Kingsley..................  Village Hall, 207 South Brownson
                                        Avenue, Kingsley, MI 49649.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Colfax County, Nebraska, and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Clarkson.....................  City Office, 120 West 2nd Street,
                                        Clarkson, NE 68629.
City of Schuyler.....................  Municipal Building, 1103 B
                                        Street, Schuyler, NE 68661.
Unincorporated Areas of Colfax County  Colfax County Courthouse, 411
                                        East 11th Street, Schuyler, NE
                                        68661.
Village of Howells...................  Village Hall, 128 North 3rd
                                        Street, Howells, NE 68641.
Village of Leigh.....................  Village Office, 109 Short Street,
                                        Lehigh, NE 68643.
Village of Richland..................  Colfax County Courthouse, 411
                                        East 11th Street, Schuyler, NE
                                        68661.
Village of Rogers....................  Village Clerk's Office, 160
                                        Center Street, Rogers, NE 68659.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2015-02497 Filed 2-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 87 (Monday, May 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 26413]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10627]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-69399A; File No. SR-CBOE-2013-039]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated Relating to Fees for the BBO Data Feed for
Securities Traded on the CBOE Stock Exchange; Correction

April 30, 2013.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission published a document in
the Federal Register of April 24, 2013 concerning a Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated Relating to Fees for the BBO Data Feed
for Securities Traded on the CBOE Stock Exchange. The document
mistakenly includes a reference to NYSE Arca, Inc. in the heading.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Balcom, Division of Trading
and Markets, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of April 24, 2013, in FR Doc. 2013-09627,
on page 24258, in the 45th line of the third column, the heading is
corrected to delete ``NYSE Arca, Inc.''

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-10627 Filed 5-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: October 2, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 190)]
[Notices]
[Page 57935]
[DOCID:fr02oc06-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-608-000]

Discovery Gas Transmission LLC; Notice of Proposed Changes in
FERC Tariff

September 26, 2006.
    Take notice that on September 22, 2006, Discovery Gas Transmission
LLC (Discovery) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff,
Original Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Attachment A to the
filing, to become effective October 22, 2006.
    Discovery states that the above-referenced tariff sheets are being
filed pursuant to the Commission's regulations to establish tariff
provisions for rendering Rate Schedule FT-1 firm transportation service
on Discovery's Market Expansion.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-16144 Filed 9-29-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


ITED STA
TES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                            WASHINGTON, D.C.  20460

                         OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND
                             POLLUTION PREVENTION

MEMORANDUM

DATE:	31 October 2013

SUBJECT:	Mandipropamid.  Petition to Establish Permanent Tolerances (and Section 3 Registration) for Residues Resulting from Use of the Fungicide on Basil, Succulent Beans, Cowpea Forage, Ginseng and Greenhouse Tomatoes; to Update Fruiting Vegetables Group 8 to Group 8-10; to Extend the Tolerance in Grapes to Subgroup 13-07F, the Tolerance in Dry Bulb Onions to Subgroup 3-07A, and the Tolerance in Green Onions to Subgroup 3-07B.  ADDENDUM to Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data.

PC Code:  036602
DP Barcode:  D415807
Decision Number:  472748
Registration Number:  100-1254
Petition:  2E8126
Regulatory Action:  Section 3
Risk Assessment Type:  NA
Case Number:  7058
TXR Number:  NA
CAS Number:  374726-62-2
MRID Numbers:  48992001-04
40 CFR:  §180.637

FROM:	William T. Drew, Chemist
		Risk Assessment Branch II (RAB2)
		Health Effects Division (HED), 7509P

THRU:	Dennis McNeilly, Chemist
		Michael A. Doherty, PhD, Senior Chemist
		RAB2/HED, 7509P

TO:		Laura Nollen and Barbara Madden, RM Team 5
		Risk Integration, Minor Use, Emergency Response Branch (RIMUERB)
		Registration Division (RD), 7505P

Background

Syngenta has contacted RD concerning HED's most recent risk assessment for mandipropamid (D414944; D. McNeilly; 27 August 2013).  That document addressed, inter alia, the requests by Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) to expand the existing tolerance in grapes to subgroup 13-07F (small vine climbing fruits except fuzzy kiwifruit), the existing tolerance in dry bulb onions to subgroup 3-07A (bulb onions), and the existing tolerance in green onions to subgroup 3-07B (green onions).  IR-4 also requested that the expanded tolerances be harmonized with the corresponding established Codex maximum residue limits (MRLs).  Syngenta has subsequently requested that the US tolerances in subgroup 13-07F, subgroup 3-07A and subgroup 3-07B remain at the current levels in order to maintain harmonization with the corresponding established Canadian MRLs.  With this request, Syngenta has submitted export information on grapes and onions from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), and these data demonstrate that the major export market for US growers of these commodities is Canada.  Syngenta also states that maintaining this harmonization with Canada is critical to allowing US growers to continue to export to other key markets, such as the European Union (EU).

IR-4 had requested (and HED had recommended) several crop group expansions with tolerance revisions that would have harmonized with Codex MRLs, but would have resulted in disharmony with Canadian MRLs, as follows:

      a)  The expanded tolerance in subgroup 13-07F (represented by grape) was recommended at 2.0 ppm in order to harmonize with the Codex MRL in grapes.  This would supersede the current US grape tolerance of 1.4 ppm, and would no longer be harmonized with the Canadian grape MRL of 1.4 mg/kg.

      b)  The tolerance in subgroup 3-07A (translated from dry bulb onion) was recommended at 0.10 ppm in order to harmonize with the Codex MRL in bulb onions.  This would supersede the current US dry bulb onion tolerance of 0.05 ppm, and would no longer be harmonized with the Canadian MRL of 0.05 mg/kg in various bulb onions.

      c)  Finally, the tolerance in subgroup 3-07B (translated from green onion) was recommended at 7.0 ppm in order to harmonize with the Codex MRL in spring onions.  This would supersede the current US green onion tolerance of 4.0 ppm, and would no longer be harmonized with the Canadian MRL of 4 mg/kg in various green onions.

HED had recommended for harmonization with Codex MRLs in the residue chemistry summary document of 27 August 2013 (D409363; W.T. Drew), rather than retaining harmonization with the existing Canadian MRLs, due to the FQPA directive to harmonize with Codex.  However, in this case it appears that the greatest trade irritant would be created by not retaining the harmonizing of the US tolerances with the Canadian MRLs.  Therefore, HED is revising the original tolerance recommendations for these three crop subgroups in order to continue their harmonization with Canada's Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) MRLs, as shown in Table 1 (below).  The tolerance recommendations for other commodities remain the same.

TABLE 1	Summary of Revisions to Recommended Tolerances for Mandipropamid.
                      Commodity as Proposed by Registrant
                           Proposed Tolerance (ppm)
                      Revised Recommended Tolerance (ppm)
                    Comments; Correct Commodity Definition
Fruit, small, vine climbing, subgroup 13-07F, except fuzzy kiwifruit
                                      2.0
                                      1.4
Fruit, small, vine climbing, except fuzzy kiwifruit, subgroup 13-07F. See footnote 1 below.
Onion, bulb, subgroup 3-07A
                                      0.1
                                     0.05
See footnote 2 below.
Onion, green, subgroup 3-07B
                                      7.0
                                      4.0
See footnote 3 below.
1. When the crop subgroup 13-07F tolerance is established, the grape tolerance should be removed.
2. When the crop subgroup 3-07A tolerance is established, the tolerance in dry bulb onions should be removed.
3. When the crop subgroup 3-07B tolerance is established, the tolerance in green onions should be removed.

HED Recommendations

HED recommends in favor of establishing tolerances for residues of mandipropamid as specified in Table 2 (below).

Data Deficiencies

No additional data are required to support HED's currently recommended tolerances.  As noted in the previous residue chemistry evaluation, however, additional data are needed to support all of the proposed tolerances associated with the petition.  The submitted snap bean data do not support the proposed tolerances in succulent beans and cowpea forage (ChemSAC meeting; 17 July 2013).  Additional field trial data on a succulent shelled bean cultivar (such as lima beans) would be necessary in order to establish a tolerance in succulent beans.  Because of the possibility of detectable residues occurring in dairy cattle commodities (fat, milk and liver) arising from the feeding of treated cowpea forage, the concurrent establishment of mandipropamid tolerances at the limit of quantitation (LOQ) in those commodities would be necessary.  However, with no validated analytical method for enforcing tolerances in livestock commodities, it is not possible to establish such tolerances.  Therefore, the proposed tolerance in cowpea forage cannot be established until a validated method for determining mandipropamid residues in livestock (cattle) commodities is available.  Any such method submitted would need an independent laboratory validation (ILV).  HED reiterates that if tolerances for additional livestock feed items other than cowpea forage are proposed, a livestock feeding study should be submitted.

Tolerance Considerations

HED has examined the residue chemistry database for mandipropamid.  There are no issues that would preclude establishing tolerances for mandipropamid for the commodities listed in Table 2 (below).

Note to RD:  Concurrent with the establishment of the tolerance in subgroup 13-07F, the existing tolerance in grapes should be removed (40CFR §180.637[a]).

Concurrent with the establishment of the tolerance in subgroup 3-07A, the existing tolerance in dry bulb onions should be removed (40CFR §180.637[a]).

Concurrent with the establishment of the tolerance in subgroup 3-07B, the existing tolerance in green onions should be removed (40CFR §180.637[a]).

Note to RD:  According to HED's Interim Guidance on Tolerance Expressions (S. Knizner; 27 May 2009), the tolerance expression for mandipropamid cited in 40CFR §180.637[a] should be revised to state:

      Tolerances are established for residues of mandipropamid, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on the commodities listed in the table below.  Compliance with the tolerance levels specified below is to be determined by measuring only mandipropamid (4-chloro-N-[2-[3-methoxy-4-(2-propynyloxy) phenyl]ethyl]-α-(2-propynyloxy)benzeneacetamide) in or on the commodity.

Recommended Tolerances

Pending submission of a revised Section F (to propose tolerance levels in accordance with those recommended by HED, and to correct some of the commodity definitions), there are no residue chemistry issues that would preclude establishing tolerances in the requested commodities, except for those in cowpea forage and succulent beans.  The recommended tolerances are listed in Table 2.

TABLE 2	Tolerance Summary for Mandipropamid.
                      Commodity as Proposed by Registrant
                           Proposed Tolerance (ppm)
                          Recommended Tolerance (ppm)
                    Comments; Correct Commodity Definition
Basil, fresh
                                      30
                                      30
Basil, fresh leaves
Basil, dried
                                      200
                                      200
Basil, dried leaves
Bean, succulent
                                     0.90
                                     None
Field trial data on a succulent shelled bean cultivar is needed.
Bean, snap
                                     None
                                     0.90
The snap bean field trials support the establishment of this tolerance.
Ginseng
                                      0.3
                                     0.30

Cowpea, forage
                                      15
                                     None
A validated method (with an ILV) is needed for residues in cattle commodities.
Vegetable, fruiting, group 8-10
                                      1.0
                                      1.0

Fruit, small, vine climbing, subgroup 13-07F, except fuzzy kiwifruit
                                      2.0
                                      1.4
Fruit, small, vine climbing, except fuzzy kiwifruit, subgroup 13-07F.
Onion, bulb, subgroup 3-07A
                                      0.1
                                     0.05

Onion, green, subgroup 3-07B
                                      7.0
                                      4.0

Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances

Instead of the proposed tolerance in ginseng (0.3 ppm), HED recommends establishing the tolerance at 0.30 ppm, in order to avoid the situation where a field sample containing residues significantly above the tolerance (0.34 ppm, for example) would be considered non-violative.

The submitted snap bean data do not support the proposed tolerance in succulent beans.  A cowpea forage tolerance cannot be established due to the lack of a livestock analytical enforcement method, and a supporting livestock analytical method ILV.  Therefore, HED is not recommending in favor of the proposed tolerances in succulent beans and cowpea forage.

In the previous residue chemistry summary document for mandipropamid (D409363; W.T. Drew; 27 August 2013), HED had originally recommended tolerances in subgroup 13-07F (small vine climbing fruits except fuzzy kiwifruit), in subgroup 3-07A (bulb onions), and in subgroup 3-07B (green onions) that were harmonized with Codex, rather than harmonization with the PMRA's existing MRLs, due to the FQPA directive to harmonize with Codex.  However, in this case it appears that the greatest trade irritant would be created by not harmonizing the US tolerances with PMRA's MRLs.  Therefore, HED is revising the tolerance recommendations for these three crop subgroups to recommend harmonization with PMRA as described in Tables 1 and 2.

International Harmonization

Neither Codex nor PMRA have established MRLs for mandipropamid in/on fresh basil, dried basil, ginseng, or succulent beans.  As such, there is no harmonization issue associated with Codex for these specific proposed new uses in the current action.  PMRA and EPA are jointly reviewing the basil, ginseng and snap bean data in the current action, and EPA and PMRA are harmonized for fresh basil, dried basil, and ginseng.  PMRA is establishing an MRL in edible-podded beans at 0.9 mg/kg, while HED is recommending for a tolerance in snap beans at 0.90 ppm.  Although the tolerance/MRL level is harmonized, HED cannot harmonize with PMRA on the commodity definition, as the submitted snap bean data do not support use on all succulent beans.

Both the current tolerance in crop group 8 (1.0 ppm) and the proposed tolerance in crop group 8-10 (1.0 ppm) are harmonized with the Codex (bell and non-bell peppers) and PMRA's (tomatoes, okras and peppers) MRLs.  For the other crop group expansions, EPA is harmonizing with PMRA's MRLs, even though this will result in discrepancies between US tolerances and Codex MRLs.  HED's recommended tolerance of 1.4 ppm in subgroup 13-07F, translated from grape data, will be harmonized with PMRA's MRL in grapes, but will not be harmonized with the Codex MRL of 2.0 mg/kg in grapes.  HED's recommended tolerance of 0.05 ppm in subgroup 3-07A, translated from dry bulb onion data, will be harmonized with PMRA's MRL in various bulb onions, but will not be harmonized with the Codex MRL of 0.1 mg/kg in bulb onions.  HED's recommended tolerance of 4.0 ppm in subgroup 3-07B, translated from green onion data, will be harmonized with PMRA's MRL  in various green onions, but will not be harmonized with the Codex MRL of 7.0 mg/kg in spring onions.

Label Recommendations

Because the submitted snap bean data do not support the proposed use on all succulent beans, the label section containing directions for the requested use on succulent beans ("Bean, succulent") should instead refer only to snap beans ("Bean, snap"), and the listing of all other succulent bean commodities should be deleted from the proposed label.  The requested use on greenhouse tomatoes listed in the proposed label is supported by the submitted greenhouse trial data.

Pesticide Use Pattern
IR-4 HAS REQUESTED THAT NEW SECTION 3 USES OF THE fungicide mandipropamid be added to the label for Revus 2.08SC (EPA Registration #100-1254).  The proposed new uses would be on basil, cowpea forage, ginseng, succulent beans, and greenhouse tomatoes.  The proposed use directions are summarized in Table 3 (below).

TABLE 3	Summary of Proposed Directions for Use of Mandipropamid.
                        Application Type; Equipment[1]
                                   Use Rate
                                   (lb ai/A)
                             Max. Uses Per Season
                            Max. Seasonal Use Rate
                                   (lb ai/A)
                                 PHI[2] (Days)
            Use Directions, Application Timing, and Limitations[3]
                                     Basil
                    Foliar; any ground or aerial equipment.
                                  0.09 - 0.13
                                       4
                                     0.52
                                       1
RTI[4] of 7-10 days.

                                    Ginseng
                    Foliar; any ground or aerial equipment.
                                  0.09 - 0.13
                                       4
                                     0.52
                                       2
RTI of 7-10 days.

                        Succulent Beans (Cowpea Forage)
                    Foliar; any ground or aerial equipment.
                                  0.09 - 0.13
                                       4
                                     0.52
                                       1
RTI of 7-10 days.

                              Greenhouse Tomatoes
                    Foliar; any ground or aerial equipment.
                                  0.09 - 0.13
                                       4
                                     0.52
                                       1
RTI of 7-10 days.  May be applied via chemigation.
1. For ground application, apply in a minimum of 10 gallons of water per acre (GPA), unless specified otherwise on the label.  Do not apply through any ultra-low volume (ULV) spray system.  For aerial application, use only on crops where aerial applications are indicated.  Apply in a minimum of 5 GPA, unless specified otherwise on this label.  Do not apply through any ULV spray system.  For chemigation, use only on crops where chemigation is specified on the label.  Apply no more than 2 sequential applications unless otherwise stated in the crop-specific section. Do not use in transplant production.
2. PHI = Pre-Harvest Interval.
3. Begin applications prior to disease development.  Use the shorter interval and/or higher rates under high pressure, or when conditions are conducive to disease.  The addition of a spreading/penetrating type adjuvant such as a non-ionic based surfactant (NIS) or crop oil concentrate (COC) or blend is recommended.
4. RTI = Re-Treatment Interval.

Conclusions:   The use directions are adequate to allow for evaluation of the residue data.  However, as the submitted snap bean data do not support the proposed use on succulent beans, the label section containing directions for use on succulent beans ("Bean, succulent") should instead refer to snap beans ("Bean, snap"), and the listing of all other succulent bean commodities should be deleted.  A cowpea forage tolerance cannot be established due to the lack of a livestock analytical enforcement method, and supporting livestock analytical method ILV.

No other revisions were made to HED's previous residue chemistry summary document for mandipropamid (D409363; W.T. Drew; 27 August 2013).


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57331-57336]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23380]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0300; FRL-9999-58]

Fenbuconazole; Pesticide Tolerances

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of
fenbuconazole in or on tea. Dow Agrosciences, LLC requested these
tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).

DATES: This regulation is effective October 25, 2019. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before December 24, 2019
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0300, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Printing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0300 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
December 24, 2019. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0300, by one of
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance

    In the Federal Register of July 24, 2018 (83 FR 34968) (FRL-9980-
31), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
8E8678) by Dow Agrosciences, LLC, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis,
IN 46268. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.480 be amended by
establishing tolerances for residues of the fungicide fenbuconazole, in
or on the raw agricultural commodities tea, dried at 10 parts per
million (ppm); and tea, instant at 10 ppm. That document referenced a
summary of the petition prepared by Dow Agrosciences, LLC, the
registrant, which is available in the docket, http://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
    After the publication of the notice of filing in the Federal
Register, Dow Agrosciences, LLC requested that its requested tolerance
for residues on tea be established at 30 ppm in/on tea, dried and tea,
instant based on additional magnitude of the residue studies conducted
in 2016 and 2017.
    Based upon the data reviewed by the Food Safety Commission of
Japan, EPA is establishing tolerances for tea, dried and tea, instant
at 30 ppm. The reason for these changes are explained in Unit IV.D.

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in

residential settings but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for fenbuconazole including
exposure resulting from the tolerances established by this action.
EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with fenbuconazole
follows.

A. Toxicological Profile

    EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children.
    Subchronic and chronic feeding studies were conducted in the rat,
mouse, and dog. The liver was the main target of toxicity in all three
species. At lower dose levels in the subchronic studies, there were
changes in liver histopathology, predominantly hepatocellular
hypertrophy, along with increased liver weight. In the absence of other
findings, these effects appeared to be adaptive liver changes, but at
higher dose levels, increased levels of enzymes indicative of liver
damage were observed (alkaline phosphatase or ALK; serum glutamic-
pyruvic transaminase or SGPT; and serum glutamic-oxaloacetic
transaminase or SGOT). Increased hepatocellular vacuolization was
observed at the higher dose levels as well, and in mice after
subchronic exposure, hepatocellular necrosis was observed with a low
incidence at the highest dose. In the rat after subchronic exposure,
the thyroid was a secondary target organ with increased follicular cell
size. In the chronic studies, liver effects were observed (including
hepatocellular hypertrophy and vacuolization, changes in liver enzymes,
and increased liver weights), as well as decreased body weight gains in
all three species. Again, in the chronic rat study, the thyroid was a
secondary target with increased thyroid and parathyroid weights and
thyroid follicular cell hypertrophy. In addition, thyroid hormones were
affected, with increased mean T4 (thyroxine) and decreased TSH (thyroid
stimulating hormone) being observed in the high-dose rats near the end
of the study. In the chronic dog study, kidney and adrenal weights were
also increased.
    In the rat and rabbit developmental toxicity studies and the rat
two-generation study, all effects in the pups occurred in the presence
of maternal toxicity, including changes in body weight in rats and
decreased food consumption and clinical signs in rabbits. Developmental
effects included increased post-implantation loss and decreased fetuses
per dam in the rat developmental study; increased early resorptions in
the rabbit developmental study; and decreased mean pup body weight,
increased number of stillborn pups, decreased number of total offspring
delivered, and decreased viability index of pups in the two-generation
study in rats. No increased qualitative or quantitative susceptibility
was observed in any of the studies. There was no evidence of
neurotoxicity in any of the studies available in the toxicology
database.
    Fenbuconazole is classified as a ``Group C,'' or possible human
carcinogen, based on an increased incidence of liver tumors in male and
female mice and thyroid tumors in male rats. A cancer potency factor
has been used to estimate potential cancer risk associated with
fenbuconazole uses.
    Specific information on the studies received and referenced in this
section and the nature of the adverse effects caused by fenbuconazole,
as well as the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-
observed-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies can be
found at http://www.regulations.gov in the document titled
``Fenbuconazole: Human Health Risk Assessment for Proposed Use on
Imported Tea,'' on pages 23-30 in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-
0300.

B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern

    Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the
pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no
appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for
derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed
based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to
determine the dose at which the NOAEL are observed, and the LOAEL are
identified. Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with the
POD to calculate a safe exposure level--generally referred to as a
population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)--and a safe
margin of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes
that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the
Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of
the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the
general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/factsheets/riskassess.htm.
    A summary of the toxicological endpoints for fenbuconazole used for
human risk assessment is shown in Table 1 of this unit.

 Table 1--Summary of Toxicological Doses and Endpoints for Fenbuconazole for Use in Human Health Risk Assessment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Point of departure and
          Exposure/scenario               uncertainty/safety     RfD, PAD, LOC for risk  Study and toxicological
                                               factors                 assessment                effects
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acute dietary (Females 13-49 years of  NOAEL = 30 mg/kg/day...  Acute RfD = 0.3 mg/kg/   Developmental Toxicity
 age).                                 UFA = 10x..............   day.                     (Rat)
                                       UFH = 10x..............  aPAD = 0.3 mg/kg/day...  Developmental
                                       FQPA SF = 1x...........                           LOAEL = 75 mg/kg/day
                                                                                based on increased
                                                                                resorption and
                                                                                decreased live fetuses
                                                                                per dam.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Acute dietary (General population      An endpoint for acute dietary (general population) exposures was not
 including infants and children).       selected. An appropriate dose and endpoint were not identified for this
                                        population group.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chronic dietary (All populations)....  NOAEL = 3 mg/kg/day....  Chronic RfD = 0.03 mg/   Combined Chronic
                                       UFA = 10x..............   kg/day.                  Toxicity/
                                       UFH = 10x..............  cPAD = 0.03 mg/kg/day..   Carcinogenicity (Rat)
                                       FQPA SF = 1x...........                           LOAEL = 30.6 mg/kg/day
                                                                                based on decreased
                                                                                body weight gain,
                                                                                increased thyroid
                                                                                weight, and
                                                                                histopathogical
                                                                                lesions in the liver
                                                                                and thyroid gland.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cancer (Oral, dermal, inhalation)....  Classification: Group C, possible human carcinogen. This classification
                                        is based on increased incidence of hepatocellular adenomas and
                                        carcinomas in male and female mice and thyroid follicular adenomas and
                                        combined adenomas/carcinomas in male rats. Quantification of risk was
                                        derived using combined hepatocellular adenomas/carcinomas in female
                                        mice. The upper bound estimate of unit risk, Q1* (mg/kg/day)-\1\ is 3.59
                                        x 10-\3\ in human equivalents. (TXR #0011894; CPRC; 4/15/1996)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FQPA SF = Food Quality Protection Act Safety Factor. LOC = level of concern. mg/kg/day = milligram/kilogram/day.
  PAD = population adjusted dose (a = acute, c = chronic). RfD = reference dose. UF = uncertainty factor. UFA =
  extrapolation from animal to human (interspecies). UFH = potential variation in sensitivity among members of
  the human population (intraspecies).

C. Exposure Assessment

    1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to fenbuconazole, EPA considered exposure under the
petitioned-for tolerances as well as all existing fenbuconazole
tolerances in 40 CFR 180.480. EPA assessed dietary exposures from
fenbuconazole in food as follows:
    i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute dietary exposure and risk
assessments are performed for a food-use pesticide, if a toxicological
study has indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring
as a result of a 1-day or single exposure.
    Although no endpoints of concern were identified for the general
population including infants and children, such effects were identified
for fenbuconazole for females 13-49 years old. In estimating acute
dietary exposure, EPA used 2003-2008 food consumption information from
the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA's) National Health
and Nutrition Examination Survey, What We Eat in America, (NHANES/
WWEIA). The acute dietary exposure analysis used tolerance-level
residue estimates and assumed 100 percent crop treated (PCT).
    ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting the chronic dietary exposure
assessment EPA used 2003-2008 food consumption data from the USDA's
NHANES/WWEIA. As to residue estimates in food, EPA conducted a
partially refined chronic dietary (food and drinking water) exposure
assessment for all established food uses of fenbuconazole. Average
residues from field trials and 100 PCT were used. Empirical and default
processing factors were used, as available.
    iii. Cancer. Based on the data summarized in Unit III.A., EPA has
concluded that fenbuconazole should be classified as ``a possible human
carcinogen'' and a linear approach has been used to quantify cancer
risk. The cancer dietary exposure analysis used average field trial
residue estimates and average PCT values. Empirical and default
processing factors were used, as available.
    iv. Anticipated residue and PCT information. Average residue values
were used in the Agency's chronic and cancer assessment of
fenbuconazole. Average percent crop treated estimates were used in the
Agency's cancer assessment of fenbuconazole.
    Section 408(b)(2)(E) of FFDCA authorizes EPA to use available data
and information on the anticipated residue levels of pesticide residues
in food and the actual levels of pesticide residues that have been
measured in food. If EPA relies on such information, EPA must require
pursuant to FFDCA section 408(f)(1) that data be provided 5 years after
the tolerance is established, modified, or left in effect,
demonstrating that the levels in food are not above the levels
anticipated. For the present action, EPA will issue such data call-ins
as are required by FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(E) and authorized under
FFDCA section 408(f)(1). Data will be required to be submitted no later
than 5 years from the date of issuance of these tolerances.
    Section 408(b)(2)(F) of FFDCA states that the Agency may use data
on the actual percent of food treated for assessing chronic dietary
risk only if:
     Condition a: The data used are reliable and provide a
valid basis to show what percentage of the food derived from such crop
is likely to contain the pesticide residue.
     Condition b: The exposure estimate does not underestimate
exposure for any significant subpopulation group.
     Condition c: Data are available on pesticide use and food
consumption in a particular area, the exposure estimate does not
understate exposure for the population in such area.
    In addition, the Agency must provide for periodic evaluation of any
estimates used. To provide for the periodic evaluation of the estimate
of PCT as required by FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(F), EPA may require
registrants to submit data on PCT.
    The Agency used the following average PCT estimates for
fenbuconazole for assessing cancer risk: Almonds: 5%; apples: 5%;
apricots: 5%; blueberries: 55%; cherries: 15%; grapefruit: 40%;
nectarines: 5%; oranges: 5%; peaches: 15%; pecans: 10%; plums/prunes:
1%; sugar beets: 1%; tangelos: 10%; tangerines: 1%.
    The Agency believes that the three conditions discussed in Unit
III.C.1.iv. have been met. With respect to Condition a, PCT estimates
are derived from Federal and private market survey data, which are
reliable and have a valid basis. The Agency is reasonably certain

that the percentage of the food treated is not likely to be an
underestimation. As to Conditions b and c, regional consumption
information and consumption information for significant subpopulations
is taken into account through EPA's computer-based model for evaluating
the exposure of significant subpopulations including several regional
groups. Use of this consumption information in EPA's risk assessment
process ensures that EPA's exposure estimate does not understate
exposure for any significant subpopulation group and allows the Agency
to be reasonably certain that no regional population is exposed to
residue levels higher than those estimated by the Agency. Other than
the data available through national food consumption surveys, EPA does
not have available reliable information on the regional consumption of
food to which fenbuconazole may be applied in a particular area.
    In most cases, EPA uses available data from United States
Department of Agriculture/National Agricultural Statistics Service
(USDA/NASS), proprietary market surveys, and the California Department
of Pesticide Regulation (CalDPR) Pesticide Use Reporting (PUR) for the
chemical/crop combination for the most recent 10 years. EPA uses an
average PCT for chronic and cancer dietary risk analyses and a maximum
PCT for acute dietary risk analysis. The average PCT figure for each
existing use is derived by combining available public and private
market survey data for that use, averaging across all observations, and
rounding to the nearest 5%, except for those situations in which the
average PCT is less than 1% or less than 2.5%. In those cases, the
Agency would use less than 1% or less than 2.5% as the average PCT
value, respectively. The maximum PCT figure is the highest observed
maximum value reported within the recent 10 years of available public
and private market survey data for the existing use and rounded up to
the nearest multiple of 5%, except where the maximum PCT is less than
2.5%, in which case, the Agency uses less than 2.5% as the maximum PCT.
    2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency used screening-
level water exposure models in the dietary exposure analysis and risk
assessment for fenbuconazole in drinking water. These simulation models
take into account data on the physical, chemical, and fate/transport
characteristics of fenbuconazole. Further information regarding EPA
drinking water models used in pesticide exposure assessment can be
found at http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/index.htm.
    Based on the (PRZM/EXAMS), the estimated drinking water
concentrations (EDWCs) of fenbuconazole for acute exposures are
estimated to be 24.1 parts per billion (ppb) for surface water and
0.031 ppb for ground water. For chronic exposures for non-cancer
assessments are estimated to be 16.5 ppb for surface water and 0.031
ppb for ground water. For chronic exposures for cancer assessments are
estimated to be 11.7 ppb for surface water and 0.031 ppb for ground
water.
    Modeled estimates of drinking water concentrations were directly
entered into the dietary exposure model. The PRZM/EXAMS 1-in-10-year
annual peak surface water value of 24.1 ppb for peppers is greater than
the SCI-GROW groundwater value of 0.031 ppb. As a result, the surface
water value was used in the acute dietary analysis. The 1-in-10-year
annual mean surface water value of 16.5 ppb for cherries is greater
than the groundwater value of 0.031 ppb. As a result, the surface water
value was used in the chronic dietary analysis. Finally, the 30-year
annual mean surface water value of 11.7 ppb for cherries is greater
than the groundwater value of 0.031 ppb. As a result, the surface water
value was used in the cancer dietary analysis.
    3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control,
termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets). Fenbuconazole is not
registered for any specific use patterns that would result in
residential exposure.
    4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative
risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made
a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to fenbuconazole and any
other substances. Although the conazole fungicides (triazoles) produce
1,2,4 triazole and its acid-conjugated metabolites (triazolylalanine
and triazolylacetic acid), 1,2,4 triazole and its acid-conjugated
metabolites do not contribute to the toxicity of the parent conazole
fungicides (triazoles). The Agency has assessed the aggregate risks
from the 1,2,4 triazole and its acid-conjugated metabolites
(triazolylalanine and triazolylacetic acid) separately. The use of
fenbuconazole on tea is not expected to quantitatively alter the
dietary exposure estimates used in the most recent aggregate risk
assessment for the common triazole metabolites because tea is not a
significant consumption item and other conazoles are already registered
for tea. The most recent triazole aggregate risk assessment (Common
Triazole Metabolites: Updated Aggregate Human Health Risk Assessment to
Address New Section 3 Registrations For Use of Difenoconazole and
Mefentrifluconazole; DP451447, dated May 15, 2019) can be found at
https://www.regulations.gov at docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0002.
Fenbuconazole does not appear to produce any other toxic metabolite
produced by other substances. For the purposes of this action,
therefore, EPA has not assumed that fenbuconazole has a common
mechanism of toxicity with other substances.

D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children

    1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA
shall apply an additional tenfold (10x) margin of safety for infants
and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal
and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a
different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This
additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the FQPA Safety
Factor (SF). In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default
value of 10x, or uses a different additional safety factor when
reliable data available to EPA support the choice of a different
factor.
    2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity. There is no indication of
quantitative or qualitative susceptibility of rats or rabbits to in
utero and/or postnatal exposure.
    3. Conclusion. EPA has determined that reliable data show the
safety of infants and children would be adequately protected if the
FQPA SF were reduced to 1x. That decision is based on the following
findings:
    i. The toxicity database for fenbuconazole is complete.
    ii. There is no indication that fenbuconazole is a neurotoxic
chemical and there is no need for a developmental neurotoxicity study
or additional UFs to account for neurotoxicity.

    iii. There is no evidence that fenbuconazole results in increased
susceptibility in utero rats or rabbits in the prenatal developmental
studies or in young rats in the 2-generation reproduction study.
    iv. There are no residual uncertainties identified in the exposure
databases. The exposure assessment was based on field-trial residues
and modeled drinking water estimates that will not underestimate
dietary exposure and risk. The acute dietary exposure analysis used
tolerance-level residues and assumed 100 PCT. The chronic and cancer
dietary exposure analyses used average field-trial residue estimates.
The chronic (non-cancer) assessment assumed 100 PCT, and the cancer
analysis made use of average PCT estimates. EPA made conservative
(protective) assumptions in the ground and surface water modeling used
to assess exposure to fenbuconazole in drinking water. These
assessments will not underestimate the exposure and risks posed by
fenbuconazole.

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

    EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide
exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the
acute PAD (aPAD) and chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer risks, EPA
calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the
estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term
risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water,
and residential exposure to the appropriate PODs to ensure that an
adequate MOE exists.
    1. Acute risk. Using the exposure assumptions discussed in this
unit for acute exposure, the acute dietary exposure from food and water
to fenbuconazole will occupy 3.0% of the aPAD at the 95th percentile of
exposure for females 13-49 years old, the only population subgroup with
a relevant endpoint.
    2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this
unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that chronic exposure to
fenbuconazole from food and water uses 6.8% of the cPAD for children 1-
2 years old, the population group receiving the greatest exposure. The
chronic risk estimate for the general U.S. population uses 2.5% of the
cPAD. There are no residential uses for fenbuconazole.
    3. Short-term risk. Short-term aggregate exposure takes into
account short-term residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food
and water (considered to be a background exposure level). There are no
registered residential uses for fenbuconazole, and therefore aggregate
exposure and risk are equivalent to dietary exposure and risk, and
these risk estimates are not of concern.
    4. Intermediate-term risk. Intermediate-term aggregate exposure
takes into account intermediate-term residential exposure plus chronic
exposure to food and water (considered to be a background exposure
level). There are no registered residential uses for fenbuconazole, and
therefore aggregate exposure and risk are equivalent to dietary
exposure and risk, and these risk estimates are not of concern.
    5. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. Cancer risk was
estimated at 1.8 x 10-\6\. The Agency generally considers
risks up to 3 x 10-\6\ to be within the negligible risk
range and below the Agency's LOC. In addition, actual cancer risk is
likely to be much lower, since the residue inputs were based on field
trial data (as opposed to monitoring data) and used upper-bound PCT
estimates.
    6. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the general population, or to infants and children from aggregate
exposure to fenbuconazole residues.

IV. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    Tolerance enforcement method 34-90-47R is available for determining
residues of fenbuconazole, RH-9129, and RH-9130 in plant commodities
through gas chromatography with a nitrogen phosphorous detector (GC-
NPD). The method has undergone successful independent laboratory
validation. The GC-NPD method TR 34-94-142 is adequate for collecting
data on residues of fenbuconazole, RH-9129, and RH-9130 in livestock
commodities.
    These methods may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry
Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD
20755-5350; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
B. International Residue Limits

    In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level. The Codex has not
established an MRL for fenbuconazole in tea.

C. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances

    The petitioner initially proposed a tolerance level of 10 ppm for
residues in/on tea, dried and tea, instant, based on 1995 magnitude of
the residue data reviewed by the Food Safety Commission of Japan.
However, based on additional magnitude of the residue studies conducted
in 2016 and 2017, the petitioner updated the proposed tolerance to 30
ppm in/on tea, dried and tea, instant. The proposed 30 ppm tolerance is
in accordance with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) tolerance calculation procedure. Based on the
residue data reviewed by the Food Safety Commission of Japan, the
Agency concluded that the proposed tolerances of 30 ppm in/on tea,
dried and tea, instant are appropriate.

V. Conclusion

    Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of fenbuconazole
and its lactone metabolites (trans- or cis-5-(4-chlorophenyl)dihydro-3-
phenyl-3-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl)-2(3H)-furanone), in or on tea,
dried and tea, instant at 30 ppm.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of

Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a regulatory action under
Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action does not
contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it
require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898,
entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

VII. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: September 30, 2019.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. In Sec.  180.480, add alphabetically entries for ``tea, dried'' and
``tea, instant'' to the table in paragraph (a) to read as follows:

Sec.  180.480  Fenbuconazole; tolerances for residues.

    (a) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Parts per
                        Commodity                             million
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                * * * * *
Tea, dried \2\..........................................              30
Tea, instant \2\........................................              30

                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ There are no U.S. registrations for use of fenbuconazole on tea.

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-23380 Filed 10-24-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Refrigeration Systems Council Session

Tuesday November 3rd, 2009 ( 10:15 am to 11:45 am ( Mediterranean 6-7

JW Marriott Orlando Grande Lakes

-Agenda-

Chair:		Jon Perry

Vice Chairs:	Frank Meier & Bill Bergamini

This agenda is subject to additions and alterations by the Chair or at the call of participating members

Welcome & Introduction							10:15 – 10:20

Refrigerant Market Survey Review						10:20 – 10:35

Julius Banks, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency				10:35 – 11:40

HCFC Allocation and Pre-Charged Products Ban Rule Update

International Negotiations Pertaining to HFCs

HFC Policy in Domestic Legislation

Implications of Determination of GHGs as Pollutants

Refrigerant Reclamation Trends

Closing & Adjournment								11:40 – 11:45

Heating, Airconditioning & Refrigeration Distributors International

3455 Mill Run Drive ( Suite 820 ( Columbus, Ohio 43026-7578