[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 152 (Friday, August 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 47546]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19572]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

In the Matter of Solar Acquisition Corp., Order of Suspension of
Trading

August 5, 2015.
    Solar Acquisition Corp. (CIK No.<PHONE_NUMBER>) is a Florida
corporation located in Ann Arbor, Michigan with a class of securities
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'')
pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act''). Solar Acquisition Corp. is delinquent in its
periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic
reports since it filed a Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2012. On November 6, 2014, the Division of Corporation Finance sent
Solar Acquisition Corp. a delinquency letter requesting compliance with
its periodic filing obligations, but the letter was returned because of
Solar Acquisition Corp.'s failure to maintain a valid address on file
with the Commission. As of June 16, 2015, the company's stock (symbol
``SLRX'') was quoted on OTC Link (previously, ``Pink Sheets'') operated
by OTC Markets Group, Inc., had eight market makers, and was eligible
for the ``piggyback'' exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).
    It appears to the Commission that there is a lack of current and
accurate information concerning the securities of Solar Acquisition
Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports since its Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2012. The Commission is of the
opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors
require a suspension of trading in the securities of Solar Acquisition
Corp.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Exchange
Act, that trading in the securities of Solar Acquisition Corp. is
suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on August 5, 2015, through
11:59 p.m. EDT on August 18, 2015.

    By the Commission.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-19572 Filed 8-5-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 56 (Friday, March 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 17653]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06604]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-7103-000]

Wright, Laura H.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on March 14, 2013, Laura H. Wright filed an
application to hold interlocking positions, pursuant to section 305(b)
of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 825d(b) (2008) and Part 45 of Title
18 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 18 CFR part 45 (2012).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 4, 2013.

    Dated: March 15, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-06604 Filed 3-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18753-18755]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06797]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2022-0062]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone, Saint Simons Sound, GA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to remove an existing temporary
safety zone which was put in place in response to the grounding of the
M/V GOLDEN RAY. Salvage operations pertaining to the M/V GOLDEN RAY
have concluded, therefore a safety zone is no longer required. We
invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 2, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2022-0062 using the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email MST1 Ashley Schad, Marine Safety
Unit Savannah Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard,<PHONE_NUMBER>
extension 242, or email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

COTP Captain of the Port
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On September 19, 2019, an emergency safety zone was put into place
to protect vessels using the waterway from response and salvage
operations pertaining to the capsizing of the M/V GOLDEN RAY.\1\ On
January 25, 2022 the Unified Command in charge of the M/V GOLDEN RAY
response and salvage operations notified the COTP, Marine Safety Unit
Savannah that salvage operations have concluded, therefore the safety
zone in Saint Simons Sound is no longer required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 84 FR 51413.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of this rulemaking is to remove the safety zone
previously established in response to the capsizing of the M/V GOLDEN
RAY. The Coast Guard is proposing this rulemaking under authority in 46
U.S.C. 70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP is proposing to remove the temporary safety zone which was
put into place on September 19, 2019, in response to the grounding of
the M/V GOLDEN RAY (located at 31[deg]07'39.66 North, 081[deg]24'10.58
West, between Saint Simons Lighthouse and the north end of Jekyll
Island, in the vicinity of green buoy #19). By removing the safety
zone, all waterway users, including commercial, private, and
recreational vessels would have unrestricted access to the waterway.
The temporary zone was originally established with the intention that
it would be removed once all response and salvage resources were
demobilized and removed from the waterway pertaining to the capsizing
of the M/V GOLDEN RAY. On January 25, 2022, it was determined that all
response and salvage resources and assests were no longer in the
vicinity of the safety zone and removal of the M/V GOLDEN RAY was
complete. Removal of environmental protective barriers including
cofferdams and precautionary containment boom were also completed.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on waterway usage and
the temporary nature of the previously established safety zone. While
the temporary safety zone that we are proposing for removal was in
place for

more than two years, it was never intended to be permanent. There were
many obstructions and hazards in the waterway, including the M/V GOLDEN
RAY and other artificial obstructions that were used in its salvage and
the associated pollution prevention measures. These obstructions
created a necessity for the temporary safety zone, but the obstructions
have been removed, therefore there is no longer a need for the
temporary safety zone. Once the temporary safety zone is removed, all
waterway users will regain unrestricted access to the waterway.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    This proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator as full access to the waterway would be
reestablished and would not prevent any vessel from entering the
previously esbatlished safety zone.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves removing a
previously established temporary safety zone. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L(60b) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG- 2022-0062 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
    Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. We review all comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may
choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that
we receive.
    Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
to the docket in

response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records
notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1,
Revision No. 01.2.

Sec.  165.T07-0794   [Removed]

0
2. Remove Sec.  165.T07-0794.

    Dated: March 8, 2022.
K.A Broyles,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Savannah, GA.
[FR Doc. 2022-06797 Filed 3-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


EPA believes the benefits would not justify the costs in any
alternative other than the proposed alternative.\21\ The benefits of
the provisions are to reduce the likelihood and severity of CWA
hazardous substance discharges and their associated impacts on human
health and the environment. Table 9 gives estimates of baseline damages
from hazardous substance discharges. Annualized damages are estimated
as $3.3 million (2016$) and represent human health impacts and
evacuations. Nonmonetized baseline damages include impacts such as
shelter-in-place events, waterway closures, and lost productivity. The
estimated annualized unit costs of proposed provisions vary widely,
from less than $100 to tens of thousands of dollars (Table 8). However,
existing regulatory programs already require many of the prevention and
mitigation actions proposed by Options 2 and 3. Even a robust
regulatory program where none existed before would not be expected to
completely eliminate all risk.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
section 1(b)(6), each agency shall assess both the costs and
benefits of the intended regulation and, recognizing that some costs
and benefits are difficult to quantify, propose or adopt a
regulation only upon a reasoned determination that the benefits of
the intended regulation justify its costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since the proposed alternative establishes no new regulatory
requirements, it neither imposes incremental costs nor provides
incremental environmental protection benefits.
2. Estimating Universe of Potentially Regulated Facilities
a. Identifying Facilities With CWA HS
    To estimate the universe of facilities that would potentially be
subject to a rule preventing CWA HS discharges, EPA first estimated the
number of facilities with CWA HS onsite. Information in EPCRA Tier II
reports was used to identify facilities with CWA HS onsite, because
these reports contain information about many chemicals, of which CWA HS
are a subset. EPA reviewed Tier II reports submitted in 16 states and
extrapolated the data nationally based on NAICS codes and United States
Census data. EPA estimates there are approximately 108,000 potentially
affected facilities nationally. For additional details on this
methodology, alternatives considered, and the results, please see
Section 3 and Appendix B of the RIA available in the docket for this
action.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Regulatory Impact Analysis; Clean Water Act Hazardous
Substances Discharge Prevention; Docket ID #: EPA-HQ-OLEM-2018-0024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

b. Proximity to Jurisdictional Waters
    EPA did not identify an appropriate method to quantify those
facilities that would not have the potential to discharge to
jurisdictional waters for this action. To estimate the universe of
potentially subject facilities, EPA took a conservative approach and
assumed that all CWA HS facilities have the potential to discharge CWA
HS to jurisdictional waters.
c. Data Limitations
    The estimate of potentially regulated facilities has several
uncertainties. First, due to the wide range of trade names used for
many chemicals and chemical mixtures, it was unclear whether
approximately 20 percent of the facilities in the Tier II reports
reviewed had a CWA HS onsite. Second, Tier II reports are required for
materials present at any one time in an amount greater than or equal to
10,000 pounds, or lower established thresholds for chemicals defined as
Extremely Hazardous Substances in 40 CFR part 355, Appendix A. If a
proposed regulation were to establish applicability criteria with a
higher or lower applicability threshold than those established in 40
CFR part 355, Appendix A, the number of potentially regulated
facilities would be impacted. Finally, the extrapolation assumes that
the fraction of facilities in each NAICS sector that have CWA HS onsite
is the same across all states. As discussed in Section 3.3 of the RIA,
alternative extrapolation methodologies were used with reasonably
similar results, which provides some confidence that the extrapolation
approach is reasonable (i.e., nationwide estimate of approximately
101,000 facilities based on Tier II data and U.S. population vs.
approximately 108,000 facilities based on NAICS codes and Census data).
3. Conclusion
    EPA seeks comments on the method used to estimate the potential
affected universe, including any additional data or information sources
that could be used to reduce the uncertainty of the estimate. For any
additional information sources, commenters are encouraged to provide
information, including where it can be publicly obtained, as well as
how the data could improve EPA's current estimate. EPA intends to
further refine the estimate of the facilities that could be potentially
subject to CWA HS regulatory requirements as additional information is
received. EPA is requesting comments on its approach to the economic
analysis, including additional sources of information or data to refine
the analysis.

B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs

    This action is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory or
deregulatory action, because this action does not propose any
regulatory requirements.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA, because this action does not propose any regulatory
requirements.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In
making this

determination, the impact of concern is any significant adverse
economic impact on small entities. An agency may certify that a rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, has no net
burden, or otherwise has a positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule.
    This action proposes no regulatory requirements. We have therefore
concluded that this action will have no net regulatory burden for all
directly regulated small entities.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175, because this action proposes no regulatory
requirements. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this
action.

H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
Section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' because it is
not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. This action proposes no regulatory
requirements.

J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    EPA believes that this action is not subject to Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it does not establish an
environmental health or safety standard and imposes no regulatory
requirements.

    Dated: June 15, 2018.
E. Scott Pruitt,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-13470 Filed 6-22-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 74 (Thursday, April 17, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 21600]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08694]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0596; Airspace Docket No. 13-ACE-11]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Holdrege, NE

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E airspace at Holdrege, NE.
Decommissioning of the Holdrege non-directional radio beacon (NDB) at
Brewster Field Airport has made reconfiguration necessary for standard
instrument approach procedures and for the safety and management of
Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations at the airport. Geographic
coordinates are also updated.

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, July 24, 2014. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR Part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone 817-321-
7716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On January 8, 2014, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend Class E airspace for the
Holdrege, NE, area, modifying controlled airspace at Brewster Field
Airport (79 FR 1345) Docket No. FAA-2013-0596. Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received. Class E
airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9X dated August 7, 2013, and effective September 15, 2013, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
Part 71 by amending Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface for standard instrument approach procedures at
Brewster Field Airport, Holdrege, NE. Airspace reconfiguration is
necessary due to the decommissioning of the Holdrege NDB and the
cancellation of the NDB approach, thereby removing the 7-mile segment
extending from the 6.6-mile radius of the airport. Controlled airspace
is necessary for the safety and management of IFR operations at the
airport. Geographic coordinates are also adjusted to coincide with the
FAA's aeronautical database.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends controlled airspace at Brewster Field Airport, Holdrege,
NE.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 7, 2013, and effective September 15,
2013, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface.

* * * * *

ACE NE E5 Holdrege, NE [Amended]

Holdrege, Brewster Field Airport, NE
    (Lat. 40[deg]27'08'' N., long. 99[deg]20'11'' W.)
Kearney VOR
    (Lat. 40[deg]43'32'' N., long. 99[deg]00'19'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.6-mile radius of Brewster Field Airport, and within 2.6
miles each side of the Kearney VOR 222[deg] radial extending from
the 6.6-mile radius to 11 miles northeast of the airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 2, 2014.
Kent M. Wheeler,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2014-08694 Filed 4-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32707-32708]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13256]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-67065; File No. SR-CBOE-2012-047]

 Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees Schedule

May 25, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on May 17, 2012 the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the Fees Schedule. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's
Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Customer Large Trade Discount
(the ``Discount''), which is intended to cap fees on large customer
trades. Currently, regular customer transaction fees are charged up to
the first 10,000 VIX options contracts in a customer order, regardless
of how many contracts a Trading Permit Holder (``TPH'') executes in a
given month. The Exchange hereby proposes to amend the Discount to
state that, for any TPH that executes 750,000 or more customer VIX
options contracts in a month, regular customer transaction fees will
only be charged up to the first 7,500 VIX options contracts per order
in that month (the ``Amendment'').
    The Exchange offers the Discount in order to encourage growth of
new products, including VIX options, which the Exchange spent
considerable time and resources developing. CBOE proposes the Amendment
in order to incentivize TPHs to bring more customer VIX options orders
to the Exchange. The greater liquidity and trading volume that the
Amendment encourages would benefit all market participants trading VIX
options.
    The proposed change is to take effect on June 1, 2012.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\3\ Specifically,

the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\4\ which provides that Exchange rules may
provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its TPHs and other persons using its facilities.
The Amendment is reasonable because it will allow qualifying TPHs to
pay lower transaction fees for large customer VIX options transactions.
The Amendment is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it
is intended to encourage TPHs to bring more customer VIX options orders
to the Exchange, and the resulting increased volume and liquidity will
benefit all market participants trading VIX options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) \5\ of the Act and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \6\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2012-047 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2012-047. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2012-047,
and should be submitted on or before June 22, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-13256 Filed 5-31-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 66 (Friday, April 5, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13530-13531]
[FR Doc No: 2019-06655]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2019-0194]

Safety Zones; Annual Events Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain
of the Port Lake Michigan Zone--Michigan City Summerfest Fireworks,
Lake Michigan

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone for the Michigan
City Summerfest Fireworks on a portion of Lake Michigan on July 4,
2019. This action is necessary and intended to protect safety of life
and property on navigable waters prior to, during, and immediately
after the fireworks display. During the enforcement period listed
below, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
or a designated representative.

DATES: The regulation in 33 CFR 165.929(e)(35) will be enforced as
listed in Table 165.929 from 9 p.m. through 9:35 p.m. on July 4, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice of enforcement, call or email LT John Ramos, Waterways
Management Division, Marine Safety Unit Chicago, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the Michigan
City Summerfest safety zone listed as item (e)(35) in Table 165.929 of
33 CFR 165.929 from 9 p.m. through 9:35 p.m. on July 4, 2019. This
action is being taken to provide for the safety of life on a navigable
waterway during the fireworks display. This safety zone encompasses all
waters of Michigan City Harbor and Lake Michigan within the arc of a
circle with a 1,000 foot radius from the launch site located in
position 41[deg]43.700' N, 086[deg]54.617' W. Entry into, transiting,
or anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene
representative.
    This notice of enforcement is issued under authority of 33 CFR
165.929, Safety Zones; Annual events requiring safety zones in the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan zone and 5 U.S.C. 552 (a). In
addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan will provide the maritime community with advance
notification of this safety zone enforcement period via Broadcast
Notice to Mariners or Local Notice to Mariners. The Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan, or a designated on-scene representative may be contacted
via Channel 16, VHF-FM or at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 29, 2019.
Thomas J. Stuhlreyer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2019-06655 Filed 4-4-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: September 17, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 179)]
[Notices]
[Page 47788-47789]
[DOCID:fr17se09-32]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2009-0447; FRL-8958-2]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; NSPS for Emission Guidelines and
Compliance Times for Small Municipal Waste Combustion Units Constructed
on or Before August 30, 1999 (Renewal), EPA ICR Number 1901.04, OMB
Control Number 2060-0424

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below, describes the
nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before October 19,
2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2009-0447, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency,
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center, Mail Code
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2)
OMB at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Kane, Compliance Assessment
and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail Code 2223A,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(202) 564-0050; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On July 8, 2009 (74 FR 32580), EPA sought comments on this ICR
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any additional
comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days
of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OECA-2009-0447, which is available for public viewing
online at http://www.regulations.gov, in person viewing at the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The
EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number
for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://
www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in
the docket that are available electronically. Once in the system,
select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified
above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public
viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, as EPA receives them and without
change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, confidential
business information, or other information whose public disclosure is
restricted by statute. For further information about the electronic
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov.
    Title: NSPS for Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times for Small
Municipal Waste Combustion Units

Constructed on or Before August 30, 1999 (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1901.04, OMB Control Number 2060-0424.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2009.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: These emission guidelines apply to small municipal waste
combustors (MWCs) constructed on or before August 30, 1999, that
combust greater than 35 tons per day (tpd) but less than 250 tpd of
municipal solid waste. The emission guidelines regulate organics
(dioxin/furans), metals (cadmium, lead, mercury, and particulate
matter), and acid gases (hydrogen chloride, sulfur dioxide, and
nitrogen oxides). The emission guidelines require initial reports,
semiannual reports, and annual reports. Owners or operators also are
required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any
startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected
facility or any period during which the monitoring system is
inoperative. Owners or operators subject to these regulations are
required to maintain records of measurements and reports for at least
five years.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1,709
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, disclose,
or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and
utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting,
validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining
information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and
requirements which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be
able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or
otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Small Municipal Waste Combustors.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 23.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, semiannually, annually, and on
occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 100,854.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $9,578,726, which is comprised of
$8,541,926 in labor costs, operation and maintenance costs of
$1,036,800, and no capital/start-up costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is no change to the hours in the
total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of
Approved ICR Burdens. Since there are no changes in the regulatory
requirements and there is no significant industry growth, the labor
hours and cost figures used in the previous ICR are also used in this
ICR.

    Dated: September 10, 2009.
John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E9-22412 Filed 9-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P