PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency s Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement, and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request 2. OMB control number b. X None U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality a.   2 0 6 0 Planning and Standards 3. Type of information collection ( check one) 4. Type of review requested ( check one)

a. X New collection a. X Regular b. Revision of a currently approved collection b. Emergency  Approval requested by: / /

c. Extension of a currently approved collection c. Delegated d. Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 5. Small entities approved collection for which approval has expired Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a e. Reinstatement, with change, of a previously substantial number of small entities? Yes X No approved collection for which approval has expired f. Existing collection in use without OMB control 6. Requested expiration date number a. X Three years from approval date For b   f, note Item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions b. Other Specify: /

7. Title Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements for Metal Coil Surface Coating Plants 8. Agency form number( s) ( if applicable)

1957.02 9. Keywords air pollution control, environmental protection, metal coil surface coating plants, reporting and recordkeeping requirements 10. Abstract Owners or operators of metal coil surface coating plants must submit notifications and reports and maintain records required by the General Provisions ( 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A). Records are also required of information needed to determine compliance with the applicable emission limits.

11. Affected public 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X")

a. Individuals or households d. Farms a. Voluntary b. P Business or other for profit e. Federal Government b. Required to obtain or retain benefits c. Not for profit institutions f. X State, Local or Tribal c. P Mandatory Government 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Number of respondents 89 a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs 232 b. Total annual responses 241 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) 4 1. Percentage of these responses c. Total annualized cost requested 236 collected electronically 33 % d. Current OMB inventory 0 c. Total annual hours requested 25,048 e. Difference 236 d. Current OMB inventory 0 f. Explanation of difference e. Difference 25,048 1. Program change 236 f. Explanation of difference 2. Adjustment 0 1. Program change 25,048 2. Adjustment 0 15. Purpose of information collection 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply)

( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. X Recordkeeping b. Third party disclosure a. Application for benefits e. Program planning or c. X Reporting b. Program evaluation management 1. X On occasion 2. Weekly c. General purpose statistics f. Research 3. Monthly 4. Quarterly d. Audit g. P Regulatory or compliance 5. X Semi annually 6. Annually compliance 7. Biennially 8. Other ( describe)

17. Statistical methods 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the Does this information collection employ statistical methods? content of this submission)

Yes X No Name: Rhea Jones, ESD Phone: 919 541 2940 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers: ( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions; ( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication; ( c) It reduces burden on small entities; ( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents; ( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices; ( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements; ( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( i) Why the information is being collected; ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number; ( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions); ( i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Office Official Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Date Director, Regulatory Information Division OMB 83 I 10/ 95


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 128 (Thursday, July 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 38126]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15601]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket No. PHMSA-2014-0089; Notice No. 14-10]

Safety Advisory: Unauthorized Certification of Compressed Gas
Cylinders

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Safety Advisory Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: PHMSA is issuing this safety advisory to notify the public
that any DOT-Specification or DOT-Special Permit high pressure
compressed gas cylinder marked as complying with the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR) by Always Safe Fire Extinguisher and
Safety, LLC (ASFES), Yonkers, New York is not authorized for the
transportation of hazardous materials in commerce. ASFES has never been
authorized by PHMSA to perform these regulatory functions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Durkin, Hazardous Materials
Investigator, Eastern Region, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 820 Bear Tavern Road, Suite 306, West Trenton, NJ
08034. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Investigators from PHMSA's Office of
Hazardous Materials Safety (OHMS) recently conducted a compliance
inspection of Always Safe Fire Extinguisher and Safety, LLC (ASFES), 41
Lockwood Avenue, Yonkers, NY 10701. As a result of that inspection,
PHMSA determined that ASFES marked an unknown number of high pressure
compressed gas cylinders with unauthorized markings. In addition, ASFES
did not have the requisite testing equipment and could not provide
evidence to demonstrate that high pressure compressed gas cylinders
were properly requalified in accordance with the Hazardous Materials
Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180).
    ASFES was never approved by PHMSA to either requalify or mark DOT-
specification or special permit cylinders as being requalified. The
evidence suggests that ASFES stamped the month (2 digits) and year (2
digits) separated by a star, on DOT high pressure gas cylinders. Only
high pressure cylinders serviced by ASFES bearing these markings are
affected.
    If the requalification is not performed in accordance with the HMR,
or in accordance with the applicable special permit, a cylinder with
compromised structural integrity may not be detected and may be
returned to service when it should be condemned. Extensive property
damage, serious personal injury, or death could result from rupture of
a cylinder.
    If DOT-Specification or DOT-Special permit cylinders have been
serviced from ASFES from calendar years 2008 to present day, and have
the marking described above (i.e., 2-digit month--star--2-digit year),
these cylinders may not have been properly tested as prescribed by the
HMR or by the applicable special permit. These cylinders should be
considered unsafe and not authorized for the filling of hazardous
material unless the cylinder is first properly tested by an individual
or company authorized to requalify DOT specification and special permit
cylinders.
    Cylinders described in this safety advisory that are filled with an
atmospheric gas should be vented or otherwise safely discharged.
Cylinders that are filled with a material other than an atmospheric gas
should not be vented but instead should be safely discharged. If a
cylinder contains a hazardous material other than an atmospheric gas
and the testing facility does not have the capability of safely
removing the hazardous material, the requalifier must return the
cylinder to the origin for proper discharge of the gas. For toxic gases
in Hazard Zone A or B, the cylinder must be cleaned in accordance with
the procedure described in CGA pamphlet C-10. Prior to refilling or
continued use, the cylinders must be taken to a DOT-authorized cylinder
requalifier to ensure their suitability for continued service. A list
of authorized requalifiers may be obtained at this Web site: http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/hazmat/regs/sp-a/approvals/cylinders.

Magdy El-Sibaie,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-15601 Filed 7-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Start attempts  (engine
             Date                Time               activity)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4/21/07......................     0951  start attempt.
                                        sample accepted.
                                        BrAC (alcohol absent, e.g.,
                                         0.000, 0.008).
                                        starter active.
                                  0952  engine on.
                                  0956  retest.
                                        sample accepted.
                                        BrAC (alcohol absent, e.g.,
                                         0.000, 0.008).

                                  1032  engine off.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

          Example 2--Acceptable Start But Fail Rolling Re-Start
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Start attempts  (engine
             Date                Time               activity)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4/22/07......................     2316  start attempt.
                                        sample accepted.
                                        BrAC (alcohol absent, e.g.,
                                         0.008).
                                        starter active.
                                  2317  engine on.
                                  2319  retest.
                                        BrAC (alcohol present, e.g.,
                                         0.025).
                                        warning given.
4/23/07......................     0047  engine off.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                          Example 3--Push Start
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Start attempts  (engine
             Date                Time               activity)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4/23/07......................     2054  ignition keyed.
                                        warning given.
                                        starter not active.
                                  2055  engine on.
                                        warning given.
                                  2120  engine off.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Example 4--Start Attempted But Alcohol Detected. Retry
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Start attempts  (engine
             Date                Time               activity)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4/21/07......................     1652  start attempt.
                                        sample accepted.
                                        BrAC (alcohol present, e.g.,
                                         0.030).
                                  1653  warning given.
                                  1656  start attempt.
                                        sample accepted.
                                        BrAC (alcohol absent, e.g.,
                                         0.015).
                                        starter active.
                                  1657  engine on.
                                  1702  retest.
                                        sample accepted.
                                        BrAC (alcohol absent, e.g.,
                                         0.010).
                                  1850  engine off.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Example 5--Start Attempted Using Filtered Sample. Retry
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Start attempts  (engine
             Date                Time               activity)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4/15/07......................     2016  start attempt.
                                        low temp.
                                        warning given.
                                  2205  start attempt.
                                        sample accepted.
                                        BrAC (alcohol absent, 0.000).
                                        starter active.
                                  2206  engine on.
                                  2352  engine off.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                      Example 6--Calibration Check
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Start attempts  (engine
             Date                Time               activity)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4/28/07......................     0900  start attempt.
                                        sample accepted.
                                        BrAC (alcohol absent, 0.000 or
                                         0.008).
                                        starter active.
                                  0903  engine on.
                                  0926  retest.
                                        sample accepted.
                                        BrAC (alcohol absent, 0.000 or
                                         0.008).
                                  1032  engine on.
                                  1045  Calibration check.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued on: May 3, 2013.
Jeffrey Michael,
Associate Administrator for the Office of Research and Program
Development National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-10940 Filed 5-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register: December 26, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 247)]
[Notices]
[Page 77431-77432]
[DOCID:fr26de06-78]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54956; File No. SR-NFA-2006-03]

Self-Regulatory Organization; National Futures Association;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Amendment
Relating to the Interpretive Notice to Compliance Rule 2-9 Regarding
FCM and IB AML Program Requirements

December 18, 2006.

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(7) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-7 under the Act,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on November 27, 2006, National Futures Association (``NFA'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by NFA. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons. In addition, on November 6, 2006, NFA filed the proposed rule
change with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC''). The
CFTC approved the proposed rule change on November 16, 2006.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(7).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-7.
    \3\ See Letter from Eileen Donovan, Acting Secretary, CFTC, to
Thomas W. Sexton, III, Esq., General Counsel, NFA (Nov. 16, 2006)
(``Letter'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Description of the Proposed Rule
Change

    Section 15A(k) of the Act \4\ makes NFA a national securities
association for the limited purpose of regulating the activities of NFA
members (``Members'') who are registered as brokers or dealers in
security futures products under Section 15(b)(11) of the Act.\5\ NFA's
Interpretive Notice entitled ``Compliance Rule 2-9: FCM and IB Anti-
Money Laundering Program'' (``Interpretive Notice'') applies to all
futures commission merchant (``FCM'') and introducing broker (``IB'')
Members of NFA, including Members registered under Section 15(b)(11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(k).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78o(b)(11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on NFA's Web site
(http://www.nfa.futures.org), at the NFA's principal office, and at the

Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NFA has prepared statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change,
burdens on competition, and comments received from members,
participants, and others. The text of these statements may be examined
at the places specified in Item IV below. NFA has prepared summaries,
set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Since NFA adopted its Interpretive Notice to NFA Compliance Rule 2-
9: FCM and IB Anti-Money Laundering Program in early 2002, there have
been a number of additional anti-money laundering requirements
applicable to NFA FCM and IB Members.\6\ The proposed rule change would
amend the Interpretive Notice to include all requirements currently
applicable to FCMs and IBs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See, e.g., Treasury Department Rule 31 CFR 103.123 governing
Customer Identification Programs, discussed in Section A of the
revised Interpretive Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The revised Interpretive Notice includes changes in the following
areas:
     The addition of Customer Identification Program
requirements and guidance issued on these requirements; \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Section A of the revised Interpretive Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The deletion of the Customer Identification and
Verification section because it was replaced with the Customer
Identification Program requirements; \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The addition of Suspicious Activity Reporting requirements
and guidance that was issued regarding these requirements; \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Section B of the revised Interpretive Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The addition of Information Request requirements and
guidance with which FCMs are required to comply. This section includes
the requirement that FCMs designate a point of contact for these
requests and that any changes to the point of contact information be
immediately reported to NFA; \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Section C of the revised Interpretive Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The addition of the Private Banking and Correspondent
Account requirements and the guidance that was issued regarding these
requirements; \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Section D of the revised Interpretive Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     A revision to the independent audit function requirement
that would permit FCMs and IBs that do only proprietary business or
that are inactive to conduct their independent audit on a 2-year,
rather than 1-year, cycle; \12\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ This change is consistent with a similar NASD amendment
made earlier this year. See the ``Independent Audit Function''
Section of the revised Interpretive Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     A relocation of the Allocation of Compliance Program
Responsibilities section.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ This information was previously included in the ``Customer
Identification and Verification'' Section of the 2002 Interpretive
Notice. Because the requirements of this section apply to other
program requirements, NFA believes it is appropriate to set it out
in a separate section. See the ``Allocation of Compliance Program
Responsibilities'' Section of the revised Interpretive Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The rule change is authorized by, and consistent with, Section
15A(k) of the Act.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(k).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In the filing, NFA stated that it believes that the rule change
will not

impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act and the Commodities Exchange
Act. NFA further stated that the proposed rule change primarily updates
the Interpretive Notice to include the requirements imposed by CFTC and
Treasury Department rulemakings.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    NFA worked with the Futures Industry Association, National
Introducing Brokers Association, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
(``FinCEN'') and the CFTC in developing the rule change. NFA did not
solicit or receive comment concerning the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The proposed rule change became effective on November 16, 2006,
upon approval by the CFTC.\15\ Within 60 days of the date of
effectiveness of the proposed rule change, the Commission, after
consultation with the CFTC, may summarily abrogate the proposed rule
change and require that the proposed rule change be refilled in
accordance with the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Act.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Letter, supra, note 3.
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NFA-2006-03 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NFA-2006-03. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing
also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal
office of the NFA. All comments received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File number SR-NFA-
2006-03 and should be submitted on or before January 16, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(75).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-22004 Filed 12-22-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P