Trial Location Appl. Rate ( lb ai/ A) PHI ( Days) Total Aldicarb Residue, ppm TX 5 230 0.02 TX 5 0.02 10 237 0.02 TX 5 194 0.02 TX 5 194 0.02 TX 5 0.02 10 230 0.02 TX 5 238 0.02 TX 10 290 0.02, 0.02, 0.02, 0.02, 0.02, 0.02 FL 10 296 0.03, 0.03, 0.03, 0.03, 0.03, 0.03 TX 10 229 0.03, 0.03, 0.03 TX 10 239 0.03, 0.03, 0.03 FL 10 271 0.03, 0.03, 0.03 FL 10 295 0.03, 0.03, 0.03 FL 10 269 0.03, 0.03, 0.03, 0.03, 0.03, 0.03 5 105 0.02 CA 10 105 0.08 TX 5 265 0.02 10 265 0.02 Total # of grapefruit samples = 42 Average residue in grapefruit = 0.027 ppm When field trial data are used to generate residue distribution files, the partially blended and nonblended RDFs are essentially the same; since field trial data generally represent upper bound estimates of residues, they are not decomposited to yield single unit residues. Using the field trial data Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 56 of 203 and % CT data, the following acute RDFs were generated:

GRAPEFRUIT, FT Acute ( RDF)

RDF21 NB= PB, Fresh 42 detects + 126 zeros Ave. Residue = 0.027 RDF22 PB, Proc. 42 detects + 85 zeros Ave. Residue = 0.027 An in orchard variability study was submitted under MRID No. 42016901, in which grapefruit were treated at 5 lb ai/ A as an incorporated band under the driplines of the trees, and fruit was harvested 60 days later. A total of 100 individual grapefruit from each of three trials ( i. e., 300 grapefruit) was analyzed for aldicarb and each of its metabolites. Aldicarb per se was not detected in any of the samples, while sulfoxide residues ranged from the LOD, 0.01 ( assigned a value of ½ LOD, or 0.005 ppm) to 0.03 ppm. Aldicarb sulfone residues were detected at or below the LOD of 0.01 ppm, and were assigned a value of ½ LOD. Combined residues in the 300 samples ranged from 0.01625 ( combined ½ LOD) to 0.04325 ppm. Assuming aldicarb per se residues are true zeroes, residues range from 0.0104 to 0.0374 ppm. The average residue is 0.017438 ppm when aldicarb per se is included at ½ LOD, or 0.011588 ppm when aldicarb is assumed to be 0 ppm. A total of 262 samples had combined residues at ½ LOD. Since all of the samples were known to be treated, the following acute RDF files were generated by adding zero residue values to account for the percent of crop not treated.

GRAPEFRUIT, FT Acute ( RDF)

RDF23 NB= PB, Fresh 300 residue values + 900 zeros Ave. Residue = 0.017438 RDF24 PB, Proc. 300 residue values + 609 zeros Ave. Residue = 0.017438 For the sensitivity analysis, aldicarb per se can be assumed to be zero, resulting in RDFs identical to RDF23 and RDF24, but incorporating residue values calculated with aldicarb assumed to be zero.

GRAPEFRUIT, FT Acute ( RDF)

RDF25 NB= PB, Fresh 300 residue values + 900 zeros Ave. Residue = 0.011588 RDF26 PB, Proc. 300 residue values + 609 zeros Ave. Residue = 0.011588 Grapefruit Processing Data In a grapefruit processing study submitted under MRID No. 102129, combined aldicarb residues in grapefruit were 0.21 and 0.27 ppm, and resulted in juice residues of 0.02 and 0.05 ppm respectively, following processing in accordance with typical commercial practices. The average processing factor Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 57 of 203 for grapefruit juice is 0.14X, and is incorporated into the DEEM   analysis using Adjustment Factor 1.

Monitoring Data In order to ensure that all available residue data have been considered in the assessment, the orange monitoring data generated by the Carbamate Task Force have been evaluated for translation to grapefruit. In translating monitoring data between similar crops with similar use patterns but different % CT information, HED typically preserves the ratio between the % detects and the estimated maximum % CT. Essentially, the detects and ½ LODs are translated, and the number of samples assumed to have zero residues is adjusted accordingly. In single oranges monitored by the Task Force, the ratio between % detects ( 4%) and estimated maximum % CT ( 13%) is 0.3. When this ratio is applied to the fresh grapefruit estimated maximum of 25 % CT, the 16 orange detects are expected to constitute 7.5% detects for grapefruit. The new total of samples is 213: 16 detects ( translated from orange), 37 samples assumed to have residues at ½ LOD, and 160 samples with zero residues. The resulting acute RDFs are shown below. The RDF for processed grapefruit was generated similarly: the 16 detects constitute 9.9% for processed grapefruit, to obtain a total of 162 samples, consisting of 16 detects, 37 residues at ½ LOD, and 109 samples with zero residues. The grapefruit acute RDFs generated using orange monitoring data are shown below.

G RAPEFRUIT, CTF Acute ( RDF)

RDF27 NB= PB, Fresh 16 detects+ 37@ ½ LOD+ 160 zeroes Sum of detects = 0.129892 ½ LOD = 0.001625 RDF28 PB, Proc. 16 detects+ 37@ ½ LOD+ 109 zeroes Sum of detects = 0.129892 ½ LOD = 0.001625 For the sensitivity analyses, identical RDFs were generated, assuming that aldicarb per se residues ( in the 16 detects and the ½ LOD values) are zero. The residue values from orange RDFs 18 and 19 were used, along with the grapefruit numbers for ½ LOD and zeroes:

G RAPEFRUIT, CTF Acute ( RDF)

RDF29 NB= PB, Fresh 16 detects+ 37@ ½ LOD+ 160 zeroes Sum of Detects = 0.120532 ½ LOD= 0.00104 RDF30 PB, Proc. 16 detects+ 37@ ½ LOD+ 109 zeroes Sum of Detects = 0.120532 ½ LOD= 0.00104 Finally, acute RDFs were generated assuming that all nondetectable residues were actually zero residue values: Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 58 of 203 G RAPEFRUIT, CTF Acute ( RDF)

RDF31 NB= PB, Fresh 16 detects+ 197 zeroes Sum of Detects = 0.120532 RDF32 PB, Proc. 16 detects+ 146 zeroes Sum of Detects = 0.120532 A summary of the orange and grapefruit residue data is presented in Table 8. The data show that the Carbamate Task Force market basket survey data have the lowest LOD ( and ½ LOD), and therefore are least likely to affect the analysis due to the assumptions made regarding nondetectable residues. In addition, these data reflect residues closer to the " dinner plate" than other monitoring data ( with the exception of the PDP juice monitoring data). Although the data are considered to be preliminary, pending completion of a review of the data, the Task Force monitoring samples have been used in the HED analysis, and have been translated to all other citrus crops/ commodities. Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Table 8. Summary of Available Orange/ Grapefruit Residue Data for Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Data Source # Sampled/# Det. Min. Res. ( ppm) 1 Max. Res. ( ppm) 1 Ave. of Detects ( ppm) 1 Ave. Residue ( ppm) 1 Individual Citrus Fruits Grapefruit, In Orchard Variability 300/ 38 0.01625 ( 0.0104) 0.04325 ( 0.0374) 0.025629 ( 0.019779) 0.017438 ( 0.011588)

Orange, In Orchard Variability 300/ 133 0.01625 0.17785 0.047989 0.030274 Orange Market Basket (= Farmgate) 869/ 160 0.005 0.12 0.0248125 0.0086479 Orange CTF Market Basket 399/ 16 0.001625 ( 0.004010) 0.029065 ( 0.028480) 0.016605 ( 0.007533) 0.001885 ( 0.001300)

Composite Samples Orange, FT 32/ 22 0.005 0.08 0.0350 0.0256 Orange, PDP 1776/ 4 0.010660 ( 0.008320) 0.043275 ( 0.034500) 0.031309 ( 0.025605) 0.035979 ( 0.025879)

Orange Juice, PDP 1392/ 1 0.01508 0.080890 0.080890 0.032106 Grapefruit, FT 43 0.02 0.08 0.027 1 Since aldicarb per se was not detected in any sample, total residues were calculated assuming zero residue values for aldicarb per se ( rather than ½ LOD). When applicable, these residue values are shown in parentheses. Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 60 of 203 Lime and Lemon [ MRID No. 102129]

The registered use pattern for lime and lemon is the same as the orange/ grapefruit use pattern. Field trial data to support use on lime and lemon are limited, consisting of one lemon field trial conducted in CA, and several lime field trials conducted in FL in which exaggerated rates and short PHI's were used. Residues in lemons ranged from 0.02 to 0.05 ppm ( MRID No. 102129). Usage estimates provided by BEAD/ OPP indicate the weighted average and estimated maximum % CT are 1/ 3 for lemon and 4/ 7 for lime. A lime juice processing study was conducted and submitted under MRID No. 102129. Aldicarb residues of 0.09 and 0.21 ppm in lime resulted in residues of 0.04 and 0.1 ppm, respectively, in lime juice processed in accordance with typical commercial processes. The resulting average lime juice processing factor of 0.46X has been translated to lemon.

In order to include lemon and lime commodities in the dietary exposure analyses for aldicarb, orange monitoring data have been translated to lime/ lemon, and the juice processing factor applied to relevant food forms. Since the Carbamate Task Force orange monitoring data reflect " dinner plate" residues and have the lowest ½ LOD of all the data sets, these data are the most appropriate for translation to lime/ lemon.

The approach used to translate the Task Force data from orange to grapefruit was also used for lime and lemon; since there is no differentiation between fresh and processed % CT for lime and lemon, the ratio between orange detects and orange fresh market estimated maximum % CT ( 0.3, as discussed above under grapefruit) was translated. For lime, the 16 detected residues constitute 2.1% detects, resulting in 762 total samples. The resulting lime RDF consists of the 16 detected residues, 37 samples at ½ LOD, and 709 zero residue values. Similarly, for lemon, the 16 detected residues constitute 0.9 % detects, resulting in 1,778 total samples. The resulting lemon RDF consists of the 16 detected residues, 37 samples at ½ LOD, and 1,725 zero residue values. The acute lemon and lime RDFs are as follows:

LEMON/ LIME Acute ( RDF)

RDF33 PB, Lime 16 detects+ 37@ ½ LOD+ 709 zeroes Sum of Detects = 0.129892 ½ LOD = 0.001625 RDF34 PB, Lemon 16 detects+ 37@ ½ LOD+ 1,725 zeroes Sum of Detects = 0.129892 ½ LOD = 0.001625 For sensitivity analyses, identical acute RDFs were generated, but using the lower ½ LOD which incorporates true zero residues for aldicarb per se, and the concomitant lower residue values for the 16 detects:

LEMON/ LIME Acute ( RDF)

RDF35 PB, Lime 16 detects+ 37@ ½ LOD+ 709 zeroes Sum of Detects = 0.120532 ½ LOD = 0.00104 Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 61 of 203 RDF36 PB, Lemon 16 detects+ 37@ ½ LOD+ 1,725 zeroes Sum of Detects = 0.120532 ½ LOD = 0.00104 Finally, assuming zero residue values for the nondetectable sample, and assuming the detected residues had zero residues of aldicarb per se yields the following two RDFs:

LEMON/ LIME Acute ( RDF)

RDF37 PB, Lime 16 detects+ 746 zeroes Sum of Detects = 0.120532 RDF38 PB, Lemon 16 detects+ 1,762 zeroes Sum of Detects = 0.120532 Proposed Uses on Citrus Citron, Kumquat, Tangelo and Tangerine In conjunction with the registrant's proposal to establish a citrus crop group tolerance at 0.3 ppm, aldicarb could be used on additional citrus crops including citrus citron, kumquat, tangelo and tangerine. Since these uses are not currently registered, there are no estimates of % CT. However, as an upper bound estimate of % CT, HED translated the lime % CT estimates ( 4% CT for the weighted average, and 7 % CT for the estimated maximum) to the proposed citrus crops. Typically, HED assumes tolerance level residues for proposed uses; however, for risk assessment purposes, the orange monitoring data from the CTF have been translated to proposed crops, in order to determine if the proposed use is likely to result in an incremental increase in dietary exposure. The lime RDFs have been translated to the proposed citrus commodities and food forms, which are also considered to be partially blended. The orange juice PF of 0.6X is translated to tangerine juice. The proposed citrus acute RDF is shown below.

CITRUS, PROPOSED Acute ( RDF)

RDF39 PB = NB, Citrus 16 detects+ 37@ 1/ 2 LOD + 709 zeroes Sum of Detects = 0.129892 ½ LOD = 0.001625 Potato Use Pattern The current use pattern for aldicarb on potatoes allows a single soil incorporated at plant application of 3 lb ai/ A. A PHI of 100 days is used in FL, and a PHI of 150 days is in effect in the Pacific Northwest ( PNW). Proposed label amendments for potatoes would reduce the PHI from 150 to 120 days in the PNW, and would allow aldicarb use on potatoes in 6 new states in the Midwest, MN, MI, ND, SD, WY and CO. The % CT estimates for both existing and proposed uses on potatoes have been described in detail under " Usage Information." Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 62 of 203 Residue Data There are multiple sources of residue data available to complete dietary exposure and risk analyses for potatoes. These include:

( i) 1992, A total of 17 side by side field trials [ CA( 1), CO( 2), FL( 1), ID( 2), MI( 2), MN( 1), MT( 1), NE( 1), ND( 1), OR( 2), TX( 1), WA( 2)] with PDA and GFA equipment. These trials demonstrated that GFA treated potatoes had higher residues, especially in row end potatoes; a total of 918 individual tubers were analyzed [ MRID No. 42827804]. The data were reviewed under DP Barcode No. D192797; S. Funk, 10/ 14/ 93. [ Since PDA equipment was used in only the TX trial, these data have not been included in the current analysis, which is intended to reflect the current use pattern ( i. e., PDA equipment required).]

( ii) 1993, A total of 8 field trials [ FL( 1), WA( 2), MI( 2), ME( 1), PA( 1), ID( 1)] which investigated the in plant and in field variability of aldicarb residues in potatoes treated at the maximum label rate. A total of 1,621 individual tubers were analyzed [ MRID No. 2827802]; the data were reviewed under DP Barcode No. D192797; S. Funk, 10/ 14/ 93.

( iii) 1993, A total of 12 field trials [ FL( 2), ID( 4), TX( 2), WA( 4)] were conducted to support use of PDA equipment on potatoes grown in the PNW and FL; more than 1,500 individual tubers were analyzed [ MRID No. 43299002]. The data were reviewed under DP Barcode No. D205271; S. Funk, 10/ 03/ 94. ( iv) 1994, Results of mid row potato tuber analyses for the FL field trials submitted to supplement information found in MRID No. 43299002. A total of 70 individual mid row tubers were analyzed to support PDA equipment [ MRID No. 43385001]. The data were reviewed under DP Barcode No. D208503; S. Funk, 11/ 18/ 94.

( v) 1996, Field trials were conducted to support the proposed use on potatoes in six states in the Midwest. A total of 12 composite samples from 6 field trials [ CO( 2), MI( 2), ND( 1), SD( 1)] were analyzed, and fifteen individual tubers from one of the composites were analyzed [ MRID No. 44244701]. The data were reviewed under DP Barcode No. D242191; S. Funk, 1/ 15/ 98.

( vi) 1996, Field trials were conducted in the PNW [ WA( 3), OR( 4), ID( 3)] to support a reduction in the PHI from 150 to 120 days. A total of 20 composite samples were analyzed [ MRID No. 44196701]. The data were reviewed under DP Barcode No. D232788; S. Funk, 2/ 26/ 97.

( vii) 1996, A study was conducted in which 143 composite potato samples destined for commercial processing in the PNW were analyzed for aldicarb residues. The participating processors were Nestle, Sunspice and Lamb Weston. Detailed information about the study was not submitted to EPA, and there is no MRID # for these data, which were discussed in the S. Funk memo dated 3/ 11/ 97 ( No DP Barcode #). The data have not been incorporated into the current analysis, since further details regarding the individual residues detected in the samples are needed. The maximum residue detected in any composite sample ( 16 tubers/ composite) was 0.38 ppm.

( viii) 1996, A farmgate monitoring study was conducted by the registrant, in which 60 PNW commercial plots were selected randomly, and composite samples consisting of 30 tubers each were collected. In order to reflect the distribution of PNW potato production, a total of 12 Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 63 of 203 fields were sampled in ID, 6 in OR, and 42 in WA [ MRID No. 44209001]. The purported application rate was 3 lb ai/ A. The data were reviewed under DP Barcode Nos. D231368 and D242191; S. Funk, 11/ 12/ 96 and 1/ 15/ 98.

( ix) 1996, The State of FL and the registrant, RPAC, sampled the same sites to yield a total of 17 ( FL) or 12 ( RPAC) composite samples; there were 19 composite samples analyzed by both the state of FL and RPAC. The State of FL used a less sensitive analytical method, and therefore the results of the two sets of analyses differed. A total of 10 individual tubers were analyzed by RPAC. There is no MRID # for the data, which were reviewed under DP Barcode No. D229956; S. Funk, 9/ 24/ 96. This data set has not been incorporated into the HED dietary exposure analysis, due to the differences in the analytical techniques used by FL and the registrant, and since there were relatively few samples. ( x) 1997, A farmgate monitoring study was conducted by the registrant, in which 44 FL commercial plots were selected randomly, and composite samples consisting of 30 tubers each were collected. In addition to the 44 composite sample analyses, individual potatoes from 4 of the composites ( 60 individual tubers) were analyzed [ MRID No. 44341801]. The data were given a brief review under DP Barcode No. D242191; S. Funk, 1/ 15/ 98.

( xi) 1997, The USDA Pesticide Data Program conducted a special survey in which 342 composite samples were analyzed for aldicarb residues; residues in individual tubers were analyzed for some of these composites. The purpose of the study was to provide a comparison between a composite value and the distribution of residues within that sample on a single serving basis. The results of this survey are discussed in more detail, below.

( xii) FY 97/ 98, The State of FL provided the registrant with a summary of residues in 41 composite monitoring samples. The submission was attached to a letter; no specifics regarding sampling or analysis were provided, and the supporting data have not been reviewed by HED. Aldicarb sulfoxide residues were detected in 5 of 41 samples at 0.069 to 0.15 ppm. The remaining samples were reported to have residues " BQL," or below quantifiable limits (< 0.06 ppm) or ND ( not detected, no LOD reported). These data have not been incorporated into the HED dietary exposure analysis.

( xiii) The effect of cooking on aldicarb residues in potatoes has been investigated, and the results of these studies were summarized for risk assessment purposes in the S. Funk review dated 7/ 20/ 95 ( No DP Barcode #). A cooking factor of 0.5X should be applied to boiled/ cooked potatoes; no processing factor was deemed appropriate for baked potato, since microwaving did not reduce residues. Reduction factors of 0.74X and 0.5X were generated for chips and fries, respectively, with an average of 0.62X. Finally, a reduction factor of 0.3X was identified for dried potatoes. These reduction factors are valid for the current dietary exposure analyses for aldicarb. Furthermore, the reduction factors should be translated to similar sweet potato food forms.

Most of the data were reviewed in detail in previous memoranda, and were recommended to be used in HED dietary exposure assessments. The results of the studies, as well as the strengths and weaknesses for use in dietary exposure assessment and risk characterization, are discussed below. The resulting residue distribution files and associated acute ( blended commodities) anticipated residues have been generated using the equations described previously. Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 64 of 203 1993  In Field Variability Data [ MRID No. 42827802]

Field trials were conducted in ME, FL, PA, WA, MI and ID; the ME and PA data have been excluded from the current analysis, since aldicarb is not used in these states. Potatoes were treated either atplant ( MI and FL) or at emergence ( MI, ID, WA) with aldicarb at 3 lb ai/ A using positive displacement application equipment. Individual potatoes were harvested at maturity and analyzed for aldicarb and metabolite residues with limits of detection ( LODs) of 0.02 ppm for each analyte. Aldicarb per se was generally not detected, but some samples had detectable residues, reported as < 0.02 ppm. In accordance with HED policy, aldicarb residues were assumed to be present at ½ LOD, or 0.01 ppm. Combined residues in all field trials ranged from 0.0325 ppm ( combined ½ LOD) to 1.32 ppm. A total of 800 tubers were analyzed for in field variability, with 100 analyzed per trial, except one of the WA trials, in which 300 tubers were analyzed. Residues were detected in 554 of 800 samples, with an average residue of 0.212765 ppm in the detects. The average tuber residue was 0.157334 ppm.

Since the data were generated in field trials, the RDF for non blended and partially blended commodities are the same. Based on fresh/ processed % CT estimates of 5/ 24 and 4/ 17 for acute the following RDFs ( and acute ARs for blended potato food forms) were generated using the in field variability data:

POTATO, FT Acute ( RDF)

RDF40 NB, Fresh 800 detects + 15,200 zeroes Ave. of Detects = 0.157334 PB, Proc. 800 detects + 2,533 zeroes Ave. of Detects = 0.157334 RDF41 B, Proc. AR = 0.157334 x 0.24 = 0.037760 1993/ 1994  Field Trials Using GFA and PDA Equipment [ MRID Nos. 43299002/ 43385001]

The study was conducted to compare residues in potatoes from side by side trials using both types of application equipment. Field trials were conducted in FL, TX, OR, WA and ID. Residues in row end tubers were compared in the FL and TX field trials; mid row data were not generated for TX, but were later submitted to support the use in FL. In the trials conducted in the PNW, both row end and midrow potatoes from trials conducted using PDA equipment were analyzed. Potatoes were treated atplanting at the maximum label rate of 3 lb ai/ A, and were harvested at maturity. In order to reflect the current use pattern, only the residue data ( mid row and end row) from trials conducted with PDA equipment have been included in the HED analysis.

With the exclusion of the TX field trial data, residue data from 14 field trials were incorporated into the RDFs. There were 4 trials from ID, WA and OR, and an additional 2 field trials from FL. In each trial, approximately 100 row end tubers were analyzed, and an additional 30 or 35 mid row potatoes were analyzed. In total, 1,329 row end and 430 mid row tubers were analyzed. Residues greater than the combined ½ LOD were detected in 493 samples, with 1,266 tubers having residues at or below the combined ½ LOD. The maximum residue detected in any sample was 1.2073 ppm. The average of Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 65 of 203 the detectable residues was 0.114587 ppm, while the average residue for all samples was 0.055507 ppm.

Using the same general format as the in orchard variability, the following RDFs were generated from the PNW and FL single tuber data, generated using PDA equipment:

POTATO, FT Acute ( RDF)

RDF40 NB, Fresh 1,759 " Detects" + 33,421 zeroes Ave. of Detects = 0.055507 PB, Proc. 1,759 " Detects" + 5,570 zeroes Ave. of Detects = 0.055507 RDF41 B, Proc. AR = 0.055507 x 0.24 = 0.013322 Although HED would normally advocate combining the two data sets, which had similar use patterns and LOD's, the in field variability study had a higher percentage of detects, and the average residue was significantly higher. Therefore, the two data sets were not combined.

1996/ 1997 Farmgate Monitoring Studies in the PNW and FL [ MRID Nos. 44209001, 44341801]

A total of 60 composites from the PNW and 44 composites from FL were analyzed for aldicarb and its two metabolites. Commercial potato plots were selected at random, and composites consisting of 15 tubers each were harvested at maturity. The fields were known to be treated, with a purported application rate of 3 lb ai/ A. For the PNW data, there were 25 of 60 samples with detectable residues, ranging from 0.04546 to 0.15878 ppm; the average of the detected residues was 0.072567 ppm, while the average residue overall was 0.049375 ppm. The combined ½ LOD for the study was 0.0325 ppm.

For the FL study, 31 of 44 samples had detectable residues, ranging from 0.02273 to 0.42877 ppm, with a combined ½ LOD of 0.01625 ppm. The average of the detected residues was 0.09352 ppm, while the overall average residue was 0.07069 ppm. In addition to the composite samples, individual tuber residue values were generated for 4 of the composites, for a total of 60 individual tuber residue values. In composites with residues ranging from 0.24504 to 0.42292 ppm, individual tuber residues ranged from 0.01625 ( ½ LOD) to 1.84585 ppm. The average individual tuber residue was 0.348709 ppm. The individual tuber data have been presented for characterization purposes only.

The combined PNW and FL composite monitoring data were used to generate the following RDF ( and associated ARs) for partially blended commodities. The average residue from the combined data set is 0.58393 ppm.

POTATO, FT Acute ( RDF)

PB, Proc. 104 " Detects" + 329 zeroes Ave. of Detects = 0.58393 RDF44 B, Proc. AR = 0.58393 x 0.24 = 0.140143 Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 66 of 203 PDP Monitoring Data The 1997 special survey was targeted to potatoes originating from FL, ID, OR and WA; 342 samples were collected in eight participating states over a period of 13 months. Composite samples consisting of 10 tubers each were analyzed, and the individual tuber residues were measured for some composites, specifically the highest composite residue in each analytical set. Because of the way the individual tubers were selected for analysis, the special survey is not ideal for risk assessment purposes.

Of the 342 composite samples analyzed, there were detectable residues in 20 samples, and individual potato tuber residues were determined in 16 of the 20 composites. Since individual tuber residues were determined in only the composites with the highest detectable residues, the reported residues in individual tubers may have been skewed toward the high end. There was no attempt to compensate for this artifact of study design in the current dietary exposure assessment; for example, no assumptions were made regarding the distribution of individual tuber residues in the four composite samples that were not further analyzed. In addition, there was no assumption regarding the potential distribution of residues in the remaining 322 composite samples that had no detectable residues.

Aldicarb and its metabolite residues were analyzed individually, with LODs of 0.005 ppm for aldicarb and aldicarb sulfone, and 0.004 ppm for the sulfoxide metabolite. Aldicarb per se was not detected in any of the composite or single serving samples. In composite sample detects, the sulfoxide constituted 79% of the total residue, while the sulfone constituted 21% of the total residue; results for single tubers were similar, with contributions of 78% and 22% for the sulfoxide and sulfone, respectively. The highest combined detected residue was in a single serving sample ( i. e, one tuber), at 0.402325 ppm ( or 0.3994 ppm, assuming an aldicarb per se residue of 0 ppm). For samples with detectable residues of the sulfoxide, the residue in the single serving varied from 0.1 to 7.4 times the corresponding composite residue. For the sulfone, single serving residues were 0.2 to 6.1 times the composite residue. The results of the study demonstrated the wide range in variability of individual tuber residues, relative to composite residues; variability for the sulfoxide was 1.5 4.7, while the sulfone variability was 2.1 4.9. The details of the study are presented in the PDP 1997 Annual Summary Report.

For the composite samples, residues ranged from 0.00785 ppm ( ½ the combined LOD) to 0.172925 ppm, with an average detected residue of 0.051322 ppm, and an overall average residue of 0.01043 ppm. Since there were no detects of aldicarb per se, the total and average residues were re calculated assuming 0 residues of parent aldicarb. The resulting minimum residue is 0.00466 ppm, with a maximum of 0.17 ppm, and an average detect of 0.048397 ppm. The overall average residue is 0.007218 ppm.

As stated above, 20 composites had detectable residues ( 5.85%), and a total of 16 of these were analyzed for single tuber residues; for several composites, fewer than 10 of the individual tubers were analyzed; in order to include these single tubers in the current analysis, the average residue in the analyzed tubers was assigned to the remaining, unanalyzed, tubers.

For the 160 single tubers, combined residues ranged from 0.007585 to 0.402325 ppm when aldicarb residues were included at ½ LOD, or from 0.00466 to 0.3994 ppm when aldicarb residues were Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 67 of 203 assumed to be 0 ppm. The average residues in the detects were 0.07059 and 0.067665 ppm, respectively. Finally, overall average residues in single tubers were 0.045388 and 0.042463 ppm, respectively.

Although the special survey is not ideal for risk assessment, the data have been incorporated into RDFs for the dietary exposure analysis in order to fully characterize exposure to residues in potatoes that might be present closest to the point of consumption ( i. e., " dinner plate" residues). Since the study was targeted to potatoes in areas where aldicarb is used, 100% of the samples were assumed to have been " treated," and an appropriate number of zeroes was added to account for the untreated portion of the crop. This approach is considered to be valid for individual tubers, since the tubers in a composite are assumed to have similar treatment histories, and since individual tubers were analyzed only when residues were detected in the composite sample. In addition, this approach does not significantly underestimate exposure, since a significant percentage of potatoes grown in FL, OR, WA and ID are treated with aldicarb. Acute RDFs and associated acute blended ARs were generated using the PDP potato monitoring data as shown below.

POTATO, PDP Acute ( RDF)

RDF45 PB, Fresh 342 PDP Comp. Samples+ 6,498 Zeroes Ave. Comp. Residue = 0.01043 [% CT = 5]

RDF46 NB, Fresh 160 PDP Single Samples+ 3,040 Zeroes Ave. Residue = 0.045388 [% CT = 5]

PB, Proc. 342 PDP Comp. Samples+ 1,083 Zeroes Ave. Comp. Residue = 0.01043 [% CT = 24] RDF47 B, Proc. AR = 0.01043 x 0.24 = 0.002503 [% CT = 24]

The following acute RDFs incorporate 0 residue values for aldicarb per se, and include associated acute blended ARs:

POTATO, PDP Acute ( RDF)

RDF48 PB, Fresh 342 PDP Comp. Samples+ 6,498 Zeroes Ave. Comp. Residue = 0.007218 [% CT = 5]

RDF49 NB, Fresh 160 PDP Single Samples+ 3,040 Zeroes Ave. Residue = 0.042463 [% CT = 5]

PB, Proc. 342 PDP Comp. Samples+ 1,083 Zeroes Ave. Comp. Residue = 0.007218 [% CT = 24] RDF50 B, Proc. AR = 0.007218 x 0.24 = 0.001732 [% CT = 24] Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 68 of 203 A summary of the potato residue data is presented in Table 9. These data clearly show that although the PDP data are not ideal for risk assessment purposes ( for the reasons described above), the data were collected with the lowest LOD values, thereby reducing the likelihood that the analysis is sensitive to the ½ LOD assumption for nondetectable residues. Furthermore, these data reflect residues closer to the " dinner plate," taking into consideration the potential for residue degradation between harvest and consumption. An additional consideration is the chance that the residue profile in processing potatoes may be substantially different than residues in potatoes intended for fresh market consumption. In summary, although there are uncertainties in using the PDP monitoring data, the data provide the most refined assessment of dietary exposure to aldicarb.

Table 9. Summary of Potato Residue Data for Dietary Exposure Analysis. 1 Data Source # Sampled/# Det. Min. Res. ( ppm) Max. Res. ( ppm) Ave. of Detects ( ppm) Ave. Residue ( ppm)

Individual Tubers 1993, In Field Variability 800/ 554 0.0325 1.32 0.212765 0.157334 1993/ 1994 PDA FT's 1,759/ 493 0.0325 1.2073 0.114587 0.055507 1996/ 1997 Farmgate [ from composites w/ detectable residues] 60/ 57 0.0325 1.8459 0.366206 0.348709 1997/ PDP 160/ 96 0.00785 ( 0.00466) 0.402325 ( 0.3994) 0.07059 ( 0.067665) 0.045388 ( 0.042463)

Composite Samples 1996/ 1997 Farmgate 104/ 57 0.01625 0.42877 0.083449 0.058393 1997/ PDP 342/ 20 0.00785 ( 0.00466) 0.172925 ( 0.17) 0.051322 ( 0.048397) 0.01043 ( 0.007218)

1 Since aldicarb per se was not detected in any sample, total residues were calculated assuming zero residue values for aldicarb per se ( rather than ½ LOD). When applicable, these residue values are shown in parentheses.

Sweet Potato Use Pattern Aldicarb may be applied to sweet potatoes soil incorporated at planting, with a maximum rate of 3 lb ai/ A. Only one application per season is permitted, with a PHI of 120 days. Usage estimates provided by BEAD/ OPP indicate an estimated maximum of 37 % CT and a weighted average of 15 % CT for sweet potatoes. Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 69 of 203 Residue Data [ MRID Nos. 101923; 42722301]

Residue data for aldicarb in sweet potatoes fall into 3 categories: ( i) field trial data consisting of composite residues; ( ii) field trial data consisting of composite residues, some of which also have corresponding single unit residue values in the tubers making up the composite; and ( iii) PDP monitoring data consisting of residues in 5 lb composite samples. When available, HED typically prefers residue data for single units of produce ( e. g., a single potato or orange) in assessing acute dietary exposure; however, single unit residue data for sweet potatoes are from field trial data, and might overestimate exposure closer to the point of consumption. Therefore, use of the composite field trial residue values may be more appropriate for risk assessment purposes. Due to the differences in combined limits of detection in the three available data sets, residue distribution files ( RDFs) for each of the data sets have been prepared for use in the dietary exposure analyses and sensitivity analyses as described below.

Residue data submitted under MRID No. 101923 include field trials conducted in LA, in which sweet potatoes were treated at 2, 3 or 4 lb ai/ A, and harvested 125 or 126 days later. Aldicarb residues were either very low or nondetectable (< 0.01 ppm) in 3 lb composite samples of mature roots. The data are summarized in Table 10.

Table 10. Sweet Potato Field Trial Summary ( MRID No. 101923).

Trial Location Appl. Rate ( lb ai/ A) PHI ( Days) Total Aldicarb Residue, ppm 2 126 0.005, 0.005, 0.005, 0.005, 0.005, 0.005, 0.005, 0.005 3 126 0.005, 0.005, 0.005, 0.005, 0.005, 0.005, 0.005, 0.005 3 125 0.005, 0.005 LA 4 126 0.005, 0.005, 0.005, 0.005, 0.009, 0.011 Ave. residue in composite samples of sweet potatoes 0.005417 ppm ( n= 24)

Additional field trial data submitted under MRID No. 42722301 include both composite and single tuber residue measurements for aldicarb and metabolites. At planting applications were made at the maximum label rate of 3 lb ai/ A, with harvest occurring 92 to 119 days later. Applications were made with gravity flow application equipment, which has been shown to result in higher residues in potatoes harvested from row ends. Current labels for both potatoes and sweet potatoes specify application using only positive displacement application equipment. Composite sweet potato samples consisting of 6 tubers were collected from both the center of the treated plots ( uniform application area), as well as from the row ends. If residues in the composite samples ( as calculated by the registrant) were greater than 0.015 ppm, then individual tubers were analyzed. Since gravity flow applicators are no longer used, only residues from the center portions of treated plots have been included in this summary. One study conducted in MD had an application rate much higher than the protocol specified; therefore, these results have not been included. Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 70 of 203 Table 11. Sweet Potato Field Trial Summary: Composites and Individual Tubers. 1 Trial Location PHI ( Days) Composite Combined Residues ( ppm) Individual Combined Residues ( ppm)

0.044814 0.06473, 0.12953, 0.02125 [ 0.01625, 0.01625, 0.01625]

0.055458 0.050450, 0.057850, 0.114250, 0.021250, 0.051970 [ 0.016250]

0.043042 0.028730, 0.111930, 0.055770 [ 0.016250, 0.016250, 0.016250]

0.031062 0.034130, 0.075610, 0.021650, 0.024890 [ 0.016250, 0.016250] TX 119 0.035182 0.036130, 0.022730, 0.072170, 0.036050 [ 0.016250, 0.016250]

0.027486 0.110090, 0.058850 [ 0.016250, 0.016250, 0.016250, 0.016250]

0.015154 0.011642 0.011714 LA 103 0.022134 0.049370, 0.136450 [ 0.016250, 0.016250, 0.016250, 0.016250]

0.016250 0.014144 0.006242 0.022334 LA 108 0.011390 0.011622 0.013978 0.012330 0.014286 SC 118 0.013986 0.021702 0.025970, 0.046450 [ 0.016250, 0.016250, 0.016250, 0.016250]

0.035966 0.032450, 0.056650 [ 0.016250, 0.016250, 0.016250, 0.016250]

0.020234 0.014490 NC 92 0.016518 0.016250 0.016042 0.014902 0.019346 NC 98 0.015450 Average Residue ( ppm) 0.020838 0.036780 Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 71 of 203 1 Composite residues in BOLD indicate residues in individual tubers were determined; individual residues in BOLD correspond to detects, while nondetectable residues are shown in brackets [].

Field trial sweet potato composites: A total of 54 composite samples were analyzed ( including both sets of field trials), and therefore the RDF is as follows:

S WEET POTATO, FT [ Composites] Acute ( RDF)

RDF51 NB= PB 54 Detects + 91 Zeroes Ave. Residue = 0.013984 [% CT = 37]

Field trial sweet potato single unit residue values: A total of 54 individual tubers were analyzed, and therefore an additional 91 zero residue values were added, for a total of 145 residues.

S WEET POTATO, FT [ Single Tuber Residues] Acute ( RDF)

RDF52 NB 54 Detects + 91 Zeroes [% CT = 37]

In addition to the field trial data summarized above, monitoring data are available through the USDA Pesticide Data Program. A total of 1,220 sweet potato samples were analyzed for residues of aldicarb, aldicarb sulfone and aldicarb sulfoxide during 1996  1998; one additional sample was analyzed only for the sulfoxide, but contained detectable residues; therefore, this sample was included in the summary of data, and the combined residue ( 0.146 ppm, as the sulfone) was calculated using the lowest ½ LOD for aldicarb + sulfone. None of the composite sweet potato samples analyzed contained detectable aldicarb per se residues, but three samples contained both sulfone and sulfoxide residues ranging from 0.017  0.12 ppm. In addition, two samples analyzed for parent and metabolites contained sulfoxide only residues of 0.015 ppm. The range in combined ( i. e., aldicarb + aldicarb sulfone + aldicarb sulfoxide) ½ LOD was 0.009620 to 0.090240 ppm, with a weighted average ½ LOD of 0.026279 ppm.

Table 12. Summary of PDP Composite Residue Monitoring Detects for Sweet Potatoes.

Aldicarb ( ppm) Sulfone ( ppm) Sulfoxide ( ppm) Total Residue as Sulfone ( ppm)

N/ A [ ½ x 0.004] N/ A [ ½ x 0.007] 0.13 0.146240 [ lowest ½ LOD for ald.+ sulfone used to calculate total]

½ x 0.008 0.048 0.12 0.182280 ½ x 0.008 0.017 0.075 0.102680 ½ x 0.008 0.017 0.017 0.040040 ½ x 0.008 ½ x 0.01 0.015 0.025880 ½ x 0.008 ½ x 0.01 0.015 0.025880 Monitoring data, composite samples: The acute RDF is constructed from a total of 1221 samples, with 6 detects. Based on an estimated maximum of 37% CT, a total of 452 samples could have been treated, for a total of 6 detects, 446 residues at ½ LOD ( 0.026279), and 769 zero residue values. Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 72 of 203 SWEET POTATO, PDP [ Composites] Acute ( RDF)

RDF53 PB 6 detects + 446@ 1/ 2 LOD+ 769 zeroes ½ LOD= 0.026279 Sum of Detects= 0.523 [% CT = 37%]

For the sensitivity analysis ( i. e., in order to determine if the assumption of ½ LOD results in an overestimate of risk), the detects should be included along with 1,215 zero residue values:

SWEET POTATO, PDP [ Composites] Acute ( RDF)

RDF54 PB 6 detects + 1,215 zeroes Sum of Detects = 0.523 [% CT = 37%]

Current HED policy allows for translation of potato residue data to sweet potatoes; therefore, the PDP potato data, reflecting residues closer to the point of consumption, can be translated to sweet potatoes. This allows for use of more reasonable single tuber data in the analysis for aldicarb. This approach may not be appropriate, since sweet potatoes are grown in many states in addition to those where aldicarb use on potatoes is permitted. There is uncertainty concerning the similarity in the residue profiles for potato and sweet potato. Using the PDP composite and single unit potato data ( described in detail above), along with the assumption of 37 % CT for sweet potatoes yields the following RDFs:

SWEET POTATO, PDP [ From PDP Potato Data] Acute ( RDF)

RDF55 NB 160 PDP Single Samples + 272 zeroes [% CT = 37%]

RDF56 PB 342 PDP Comp. Samples + 582 zeroes Ave. Residue = 0.01043 [% CT = 37%]

For the sensitivity analysis, identical RDFs were generated assuming aldicarb per se residues of 0 ppm:

SWEET POTATO, PDP [ From PDP Potato Data] Acute ( RDF)

RDF57 NB 160 PDP Single Samples + 272 zeroes [% CT = 37%]

RDF58 PB 342 PDP Comp. Samples + 582 zeroes Ave. Residue = 0.007218 [% CT = 37%]

BANANAS  PROPOSED USE Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 73 of 203 The registrant has petitioned the Agency to establish an import tolerance for aldicarb residues in bananas ( pulp), at 0.008 ppm. HED noted that the appropriate tolerance is 0.03 ppm ( whole fruit). In accordance with the proposed label, aldicarb is to be applied to bananas grown outside the US using a unique new Banana In Plant System. In a review of the submission, HED recommended use of the ½ LOD residue value, 0.0069 ppm, in dietary exposure analysis. Aldicarb and metabolite residues were below the combined ½ LOD in composite and single unit pulp and puree. In order to assess dietary exposure associated with the proposed use on bananas, the following RDF was generated, based on a 45 % market share.

BANANA  PROPOSED Acute ( RDF)

RDF59 NB= PB 45@ ½ LOD + 55 Zeroes ½ LOD= 0.0069 Est. Market share = 45%

POTATOES  PROPOSED LABEL AMENDMENTS As stated above, the registrant has proposed label amendments allowing aldicarb application to potatoes grown in six Midwestern states, and to allow a PHI of 120 days in the PNW. Data supporting the proposed label amendments have been reviewed in HED, and are considered acceptable. Based on these data, the residue profile would not be expected to change significantly if the label amendments were to be approved by the Agency.

In order to incorporate the proposed uses into the HED dietary exposure assessment, acute RDFs were generated for the following scenarios:

Current Use + Shorter PHI Current Use + Six MW states Current Use + Shorter PHI + Six MW states The PDP Special Survey in Potatoes ( 1997) was the source of residue data, and the % CT information provided by BEAD/ EPA was used to determine the appropriate number of 0 residue values for each RDF. [ The assumption that the PDP composite and single tuber data sets constitute the " treated" potatoes was incorporated into the proposed label amendment analyses, and therefore zero residue values were added to the RDFs to account for the remainder of the " untreated" US potato crop.] The % CT information and the results of the PDP potato monitoring study have been discussed in detail above. Assuming aldicarb per se residues of 0 ppm, the following sets of RDFs have been generated:

Current Use + Shorter PHI:

POTATO, PDP Acute ( RDF)

RDF60 PB, Fresh 342 PDP Comp. Samples+ 3,458 Zeroes Ave. Comp. Residue = 0.007218 [% CT = 9%] Attachment 3: Aldicarb Residue Data and Anticipated Residues for the DEEM   Analysis.

Page 74 of 203 RDF61 NB, Fresh 160 PDP Single Samples+ 1,618 Zeroes Ave. Residue = 0.042463 [% CT = 9%]

PB, Proc. 342 PDP Comp. Samples+ 608 Zeroes Ave. Comp. Residue = 0.007218 [% CT = 36%] RDF62 B, Proc. AR = 0.007218 x 0.36 = 0.002518 [% CT = 36%]

Current Use + Six Midwestern States:

POTATO, PDP Acute ( RDF)

RDF63 PB, Fresh 342 PDP Comp. Samples+ 4,544 Zeroes Ave. Comp. Residue = 0.007218 [% CT = 7%]

RDF64 NB, Fresh 160 PDP Single Samples+ 2,126 Zeroes Ave. Residue = 0.042463 [% CT = 7%]

PB, Proc. 342 PDP Comp. Samples+ 879 Zeroes Ave. Comp. Residue = 0.007218 [% CT = 28%] RDF65 B, Proc. AR = 0.007218 x 0.28 = 0.002021 [% CT = 28%]

Current Use + Shorter PHI + Six Midwestern States:

POTATO, PDP Acute ( RDF)

RDF66 PB, Fresh 342 PDP Comp. Samples+ 3,078 Zeroes Ave. Comp. Residue = 0.007218 [% CT = 10%]

RDF67 NB, Fresh 160 PDP Single Samples+ 1,440 Zeroes Ave. Residue = 0.042463 [% CT = 10%]

PB, Proc. 342 PDP Comp. Samples+ 513 Zeroes Ave. Comp. Residue = 0.007218 [% CT = 40%] RDF68 B, Proc. AR = 0.007218 x 0.40 = 0.002887 [% CT = 40%] Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 75 of 203 PECANS RDF1: Pecan Field Trial Residue Data [ MRID No. 102123] Estimated Maximum % CT = 8% TOTALZ= 253 4,0.005 2,0.02 2,0.03 2,0.05 2,0.01 0.04 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.09 0.11 0.10 0.27 0.12 0.17 ORANGES RDF2 Orange FT Data [ MRID No. 36313] NB and PB  Fresh [ 32 detects] Estimated Max. % CT = 13% TOTALZ= 214 0.07 0.06 3,0.03 3,0.04 5,0.05 9,0.02 10,0.005 RDF3 Orange FT Data [ MRID No. 36313] PB  Processed [ 32 detects] Estimated Max. % CT = 23% TOTALZ= 107 0.07 0.06 3,0.03 3,0.04 5,0.05 9,0.02 10,0.005 RDF4: Orange, In Orchard Study ( FT), Fresh Oranges Estimated Max. % CT = 13 % CT TOTALZ= 2007 3,0.17785 0.16705 0.15125 0.14545 0.14045 0.13465 2,0.12965 0.12305 0.11885 0.11225 0.10805 5,0.07565 6,0.06485 18,0.05405 13,0.04325 38,0.03245 38,0.02165 168,0.01625 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 76 of 203 RDF5: Orange, In Orchard Study ( FT), Processed Oranges Estimated Max. % CT = 23 % CT TOTALZ= 1004 3,0.17785 0.16705 0.15125 0.14545 0.14045 0.13465 2,0.12965 0.12305 0.11885 0.11225 0.10805 5,0.07565 6,0.06485 18,0.05405 13,0.04325 38,0.03245 38,0.02165 168,0.01625 RDF6: Orange " Market Basket," Fresh Market [ 869 Detects] Estimated Max. % CT = 13 TOTALZ= 5815 0.12 0.1 0.09 4,0.08 2,0.07 5,0.06 6,0.05 13,0.04 20,0.03 41,0.02 66,0.01 709,0.005 RDF7: Orange " Market Basket," Processed Oranges [ 869 Detects] Estimated Max. % CT = 23 TOTALZ= 2909 0.12 0.1 0.09 4,0.08 2,0.07 5,0.06 6,0.05 13,0.04 20,0.03 41,0.02 66,0.01 709,0.005 RDF8: Orange PDP Monitoring Data, Fresh Oranges [ 4 detects] Estimated Max. % CT = 13% TOTALZ= 1545 227,0.036451 0.043275 0.028040 0.028040 0.025880 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 77 of 203 RDF9: Orange PDP Monitoring Data, Processed Oranges [ 4 detects] Estimated Max. % CT = 23% TOTALZ= 1367 405,0.036451 0.043275 0.028040 0.028040 0.025880 RDF10: Orange, PB PDP Monitoring Data, Fresh Oranges [ 4 detects]: Sensitivity Analysis Assume aldicarb = 0 Estimated Max. % CT = 13% TOTALZ= 1545 227,0.025848 0.034500 0.023360 0.023360 0.021200 RDF11: Orange, PB PDP Monitoring Data, Processed Oranges [ 4 detects]: Sensitivity Analysis Assume aldicarb = 0 Estimated Max. % CT = 23% TOTALZ= 1367 405,0.025848 0.034500 0.023360 0.023360 0.021200 RDF12: Orange PDP Data, PB Fresh/ Processed Oranges [ 4 detects]: Sensitivity Analysis Aldicarb = 0 ppm Estimated Max. % CT = 13/ 23% TOTALZ= 1772 0.034500 0.023360 0.023360 0.021200 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 78 of 203 RDF13: Orange Juice, Fresh, PB PDP Monitoring Data [ 1 detect] Estimated Max. % CT = 13% TOTALZ= 1211 180,0.032106 0.080890 RDF14: Orange Juice, Processed, PB PDP Monitoring Data [ 1 detect] Estimated Max. % CT = 23% TOTALZ= 1072 319,0.032106 0.080890 RDF15: Orange Juice, Fresh/ Proc. PDP Monitoring Data [ 1 detect], Sensitivity Analysis Estimated Max. % CT = 13%/ 23% TOTALZ= 1391 0.080890 RDF16: Orange, NB, PB Fresh, Carbamate Task Force MBS Data [ 16 Detects] Estimated Max. % CT = 13% TOTALZ= 347 36,0.001625 0.029065 0.029045 0.015845 0.009655 0.009041 0.006977 0.004235 0.004217 0.004109 0.003557 0.003245 0.003029 0.002273 0.0020678 0.002057 0.0014738 RDF17: Orange, PB Processed, Carbamate Task Force MBS Data [ 16 Detects] Estimated Max. % CT = 23% TOTALZ= 307 76,0.001625 0.029065 0.029045 0.015845 0.009655 0.009041 0.006977 0.004235 0.004217 0.004109 0.003557 0.003245 0.003029 0.002273 0.0020678 0.002057 0.0014738 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 79 of 203 RDF18: Orange, NB, PB, Fresh Carb. Task Force MBS Data [ 16 Detects], Sensitivity Analysis Aldicarb = 0 Estimated Max. % CT = 13% TOTALZ= 347 36,0.00104 0.02848 0.02846 0.01526 0.00907 0.008456 0.006392 0.00365 0.003632 0.003524 0.002972 0.00266 0.002444 0.001688 0.0014828 0.001472 0.0008888 RDF19: Orange, PB Proc., Carbamate Task Force MBS Data [ 16 Detects], Sensitivity Analysis Aldicarb = 0 Estimated Max. % CT = 23% TOTALZ= 307 76,0.00104 0.02848 0.02846 0.01526 0.00907 0.008456 0.006392 0.00365 0.003632 0.003524 0.002972 0.00266 0.002444 0.001688 0.0014828 0.001472 0.0008888 RDF20: Orange, PB, NB, Fresh/ Processed: Carbamate MBS [ 16 Detects]: Sensitivity Analysis Aldicarb = 0 Estimated Max. % CT = 13/ 23% TOTALZ= 383 0.02848 0.02846 0.01526 0.00907 0.008456 0.006392 0.00365 0.003632 0.003524 0.002972 0.00266 0.002444 0.001688 0.0014828 0.001472 0.0008888 RDF21: Grapefruit Composite FT Data [ MRID No. 148971] PB and NB  Fresh [ 42 detects] Estimated Max. % CT = 25% TOTALZ= 126 17,0.02 24,0.03 0.08 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 80 of 203 RDF22: Grapefruit Composite FT Data [ MRID No. 148971] PB and NB  Processed [ 42 detects] Estimated Max. % CT = 33% TOTALZ= 85 17,0.02 24,0.03 0.08 RDF23: Grapefruit, NB= PB, Fresh In Orchard Variability, MRID No. 42016901 [ 300 samples] Estimated Max % CT = 25% TOTALZ= 900 0.04325 12,0.03245 25,0.02165 262,0.01625 RDF24: Grapefruit, NB= PB, Proc. In Orchard Variability, MRID No. 42016901 [ 300 samples] Estimated Max % CT = 33% TOTALZ= 609 0.04325 12,0.03245 25,0.02165 262,0.01625 RDF25: Grapefruit, NB= PB, Fresh In Orchard Variability, MRID No. 42016901 [ 300 samples] Sensitivity Analysis, Aldicarb = 0 Estimated Max % CT = 25% TOTALZ= 900 0.0374 12,0.0266 25,0.0158 262,0.0104 RDF26: Grapefruit, NB= PB, Proc. In Orchard Variability, MRID No. 42016901 [ 300 samples] Sensitivity Analysis, Aldicarb= 0 Estimated Max % CT = 33% TOTALZ= 609 0.0374 12,0.0266 25,0.0158 262,0.0104 RDF27: Grapefruit, NB, PB Fresh, Carbamate Task Force MBS Orange Data [ 16 Detects] Estimated Max. % CT = 25% TOTALZ= 160 37,0.001625 0.029065 0.029045 0.015845 0.009655 0.009041 0.006977 0.004235 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 81 of 203 0.004217 0.004109 0.003557 0.003245 0.003029 0.002273 0.0020678 0.002057 0.0014738 RDF28: Grapefruit, PB Processed, Carbamate Task Force Orange MBS Data [ 16 Detects] Estimated Max. % CT = 33% TOTALZ= 109 37,0.001625 0.029065 0.029045 0.015845 0.009655 0.009041 0.006977 0.004235 0.004217 0.004109 0.003557 0.003245 0.003029 0.002273 0.0020678 0.002057 0.0014738 RDF29: Grapefruit, NB, PB, Fresh Carb. Task Force Orange MBS Data [ 16 Detects] Sensitivity Analysis, Aldicarb = 0 Estimated Max. % CT = 25% TOTALZ= 160 37,0.00104 0.02848 0.02846 0.01526 0.00907 0.008456 0.006392 0.00365 0.003632 0.003524 0.002972 0.00266 0.002444 0.001688 0.0014828 0.001472 0.0008888 RDF30: Grapefruit PB Proc., Carbamate Task Force MBS Data [ 16 Detects] Sensitivity Analysis, Aldicarb = 0 Estimated Max. % CT = 33% TOTALZ= 109 37,0.00104 0.02848 0.02846 0.01526 0.00907 0.008456 0.006392 0.00365 0.003632 0.003524 0.002972 0.00266 0.002444 0.001688 0.0014828 0.001472 0.0008888 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 82 of 203 RDF31: Grapefruit, PB, NB, Fresh: Carbamate Orange MBS [ 16 Detects] Sensitivity Analysis, Aldicarb = 0 Estimated Max. % CT = 25% TOTALZ= 197 0.02848 0.02846 0.01526 0.00907 0.008456 0.006392 0.00365 0.003632 0.003524 0.002972 0.00266 0.002444 0.001688 0.0014828 0.001472 0.0008888 RDF32: Grapefruit, PB, Processed: Carbamate Orange MBS [ 16 Detects] Sensitivity Analysis, Aldicarb = 0 Estimated Max. % CT = 33% TOTALZ= 146 0.02848 0.02846 0.01526 0.00907 0.008456 0.006392 0.00365 0.003632 0.003524 0.002972 0.00266 0.002444 0.001688 0.0014828 0.001472 0.0008888 RDF33: Lime, PB Carbamate Task Force Orange MBS Data [ 16 Detects] Estimated Max. % CT = 7% TOTALZ= 709 37,0.001625 0.029065 0.029045 0.015845 0.009655 0.009041 0.006977 0.004235 0.004217 0.004109 0.003557 0.003245 0.003029 0.002273 0.0020678 0.002057 0.0014738 RDF34: Lemon, PB Carbamate Task Force Orange MBS Data [ 16 Detects] Estimated Max. % CT = 3% TOTALZ= 1725 37,0.001625 0.029065 0.029045 0.015845 0.009655 0.009041 0.006977 0.004235 0.004217 0.004109 0.003557 0.003245 0.003029 0.002273 0.0020678 0.002057 0.0014738 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 83 of 203 RDF35: Lime, PB Carbamate Task Force Orange MBS Data [ 16 Detects] Sensitivity Analysis, Aldicarb = 0 Estimated Max. % CT = 7% TOTALZ= 709 37,0.00104 0.02848 0.02846 0.01526 0.00907 0.008456 0.006392 0.00365 0.003632 0.003524 0.002972 0.00266 0.002444 0.001688 0.0014828 0.001472 0.0008888 RDF36: Lemon, PB Carbamate Task Force Orange MBS Data [ 16 Detects] Sensitivity Analysis, Aldicarb = 0 Estimated Max. % CT = 3% TOTALZ= 1725 37,0.00104 0.02848 0.02846 0.01526 0.00907 0.008456 0.006392 0.00365 0.003632 0.003524 0.002972 0.00266 0.002444 0.001688 0.0014828 0.001472 0.0008888 RDF37: Lime, PB Carbamate Task Force MBS [ 16 Detects]: Sensitivity Analysis Aldicarb = 0 Estimated Max. % CT = 7% TOTALZ= 746 0.02848 0.02846 0.01526 0.00907 0.008456 0.006392 0.00365 0.003632 0.003524 0.002972 0.00266 0.002444 0.001688 0.0014828 0.001472 0.0008888 RDF38: Lemon, PB Carbamate Task Force MBS [ 16 Detects]: Sensitivity Analysis Aldicarb = 0 Estimated Max. % CT = 3% TOTALZ= 1762 0.02848 0.02846 0.01526 0.00907 0.008456 0.006392 0.00365 0.003632 0.003524 0.002972 0.00266 0.002444 0.001688 0.0014828 0.001472 0.0008888 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 84 of 203 RDF39: Proposed Citrus, PB Carbamate Task Force Orange MBS Data [ 16 Detects] Sensitivity Analysis, Aldicarb = 0 Estimated Max. % CT = 7% TOTALZ= 709 37,0.00104 0.02848 0.02846 0.01526 0.00907 0.008456 0.006392 0.00365 0.003632 0.003524 0.002972 0.00266 0.002444 0.001688 0.0014828 0.001472 0.0008888 RDF40 Potato, Fresh, NB= PB, In field variability = 800 " detects" [ MRID No. 42827802] Estimated Max % CT = 5% TOTALZ= 15200 246,0.0325 1.3241 0.9489 0.9477 0.9185 0.8565 0.8241 0.8133 0.7949 0.7913 0.7693 0.7373 0.7349 0.7105 0.6825 0.6637 0.6437 0.6361 0.6337 0.6229 0.6061 0.5985 0.5869 0.5821 0.5789 2,0.5761 0.5737 0.5685 0.5645 0.5569 2,0.5537 0.5481 0.5441 0.5413 0.5405 0.5353 0.5337 0.5245 0.5121 0.5113 0.5005 4,0.4797 0.4721 0.4697 0.4673 0.4597 0.4557 0.4525 2,0.4497 0.4489 0.4481 0.4473 0.4465 0.4457 0.4389 0.4377 0.4349 0.4281 0.4265 0.4257 0.4249 0.4173 0.4165 0.4157 2,0.4141 0.4125 0.4057 0.4033 0.4033 0.4025 0.4017 0.4001 0.3957 0.3925 0.3865 0.3833 2,0.3825 0.3741 0.3733 0.3725 0.3709 0.3693 0.3633 2,0.3625 0.3593 0.3533 2,0.3517 3,0.3493 0.3485 0.3425 0.3417 0.3401 0.3325 0.3317 0.3309 2,0.3301 0.3293 0.3277 2,0.3209 2,0.3201 0.3193 0.3185 0.3185 2,0.3177 0.3153 2,0.3101 3,0.3093 0.3085 2,0.3077 0.3061 2,0.3053 0.3045 2,0.3001 0.2993 3,0.2985 4,0.2977 0.2969 2,0.2885 0.2869 0.2861 0.2785 0.2777 0.2769 2,0.2761 0.2745 0.2677 2,0.2669 4,0.2661 0.2621 2,0.2569 3,0.2561 0.2545 2,0.2537 0.2529 0.2477 0.2469 3,0.2461 4,0.2453 4,0.2445 0.2361 0.2353 0.2345 0.2337 2,0.2329 2,0.2253 0.2245 4,0.2237 0.2221 0.2213 0.2205 0.2145 5,0.2137 4,0.2129 4,0.2121 0.2097 0.2045 0.2029 4,0.2021 2,0.2013 2,0.1997 3,0.1937 5,0.1929 0.1921 3,0.1913 0.1905 0.1897 2,0.1889 5,0.1821 4,0.1813 3,0.1805 0.1789 0.1773 0.1729 0.1721 4,0.1713 3,0.1705 4,0.1697 2,0.1681 0.1665 0.1613 2,0.1605 0.1597 2,0.1589 3,0.1573 0.1513 0.1505 5,0.1497 4,0.1489 0.1481 2,0.1473 2,0.1465 0.1457 2,0.1389 8,0.1381 2,0.1373 0.1365 6,0.1289 6,0.1281 3,0.1273 2,0.1265 0.1257 0.1189 0.1181 5,0.1173 5,0.1165 4,0.1157 0.1149 2,0.1081 2,0.1073 10,0.1065 7,0.1057 8,0.0973 5,0.0965 7,0.0957 7,0.0949 0.0941 8,0.0865 15,0.0857 9,0.0849 2,0.0841 13,0.0757 3,0.0749 11,0.0741 0.0658 19,0.0649 5,0.0641 3,0.0633 22,0.0541 5,0.0533 0.0461 0.0442 38,0.0433 5,0.0425 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 85 of 203 RDF41 Potato, Processed, NB= PB, In field variability = 800 " detects" [ MRID No. 42827802] Estimated Max % CT = 24% TOTALZ= 2533 246,0.0325 1.3241 0.9489 0.9477 0.9185 0.8565 0.8241 0.8133 0.7949 0.7913 0.7693 0.7373 0.7349 0.7105 0.6825 0.6637 0.6437 0.6361 0.6337 0.6229 0.6061 0.5985 0.5869 0.5821 0.5789 2,0.5761 0.5737 0.5685 0.5645 0.5569 2,0.5537 0.5481 0.5441 0.5413 0.5405 0.5353 0.5337 0.5245 0.5121 0.5113 0.5005 4,0.4797 0.4721 0.4697 0.4673 0.4597 0.4557 0.4525 2,0.4497 0.4489 0.4481 0.4473 0.4465 0.4457 0.4389 0.4377 0.4349 0.4281 0.4265 0.4257 0.4249 0.4173 0.4165 0.4157 2,0.4141 0.4125 0.4057 0.4033 0.4033 0.4025 0.4017 0.4001 0.3957 0.3925 0.3865 0.3833 2,0.3825 0.3741 0.3733 0.3725 0.3709 0.3693 0.3633 2,0.3625 0.3593 0.3533 2,0.3517 3,0.3493 0.3485 0.3425 0.3417 0.3401 0.3325 0.3317 0.3309 2,0.3301 0.3293 0.3277 2,0.3209 2,0.3201 0.3193 0.3185 0.3185 2,0.3177 0.3153 2,0.3101 3,0.3093 0.3085 2,0.3077 0.3061 2,0.3053 0.3045 2,0.3001 0.2993 3,0.2985 4,0.2977 0.2969 2,0.2885 0.2869 0.2861 0.2785 0.2777 0.2769 2,0.2761 0.2745 0.2677 2,0.2669 4,0.2661 0.2621 2,0.2569 3,0.2561 0.2545 2,0.2537 0.2529 0.2477 0.2469 3,0.2461 4,0.2453 4,0.2445 0.2361 0.2353 0.2345 0.2337 2,0.2329 2,0.2253 0.2245 4,0.2237 0.2221 0.2213 0.2205 0.2145 5,0.2137 4,0.2129 4,0.2121 0.2097 0.2045 0.2029 4,0.2021 2,0.2013 2,0.1997 3,0.1937 5,0.1929 0.1921 3,0.1913 0.1905 0.1897 2,0.1889 5,0.1821 4,0.1813 3,0.1805 0.1789 0.1773 0.1729 0.1721 4,0.1713 3,0.1705 4,0.1697 2,0.1681 0.1665 0.1613 2,0.1605 0.1597 2,0.1589 3,0.1573 0.1513 0.1505 5,0.1497 4,0.1489 0.1481 2,0.1473 2,0.1465 0.1457 2,0.1389 8,0.1381 2,0.1373 0.1365 6,0.1289 6,0.1281 3,0.1273 2,0.1265 0.1257 0.1189 0.1181 5,0.1173 5,0.1165 4,0.1157 0.1149 2,0.1081 2,0.1073 10,0.1065 7,0.1057 8,0.0973 5,0.0965 7,0.0957 7,0.0949 0.0941 8,0.0865 15,0.0857 9,0.0849 2,0.0841 13,0.0757 3,0.0749 11,0.0741 0.0658 19,0.0649 5,0.0641 3,0.0633 22,0.0541 5,0.0533 0.0461 0.0442 38,0.0433 5,0.0425 RDF42 Potato, Fresh, NB= PB, PDA vs. GFA, 1,759 " detects" [ MRID Nos 43299002/ 43385001] Estimated Max % CT = 5% TOTALZ= 33421 1266,0.0325 1.2073 1.1401 0.6681 0.6465 0.6253 0.5701 0.5381 0.5169 0.3981 0.3889 0.3873 0.3757 0.3409 0.3385 0.3225 0.3101 0.3093 0.3009 0.2985 0.2917 0.2885 0.2809 0.2793 0.2701 0.2685 0.2661 0.2637 0.2637 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 86 of 203 0.2577 0.2569 0.2553 0.2529 0.2477 0.2429 0.2361 0.2345 3,0.2321 0.2269 2,0.2261 0.2245 2,0.2229 0.2221 0.2161 2,0.2153 0.2145 0.2121 0.2105 0.2097 0.2037 2,0.2029 2,0.2013 0.1945 3,0.1937 0.1921 0.1905 0.1897 3,0.1837 0.1829 0.1821 2,0.1813 4,0.1805 2,0.1789 2,0.1729 2,0.1721 2,0.1713 2,0.1689 2,0.1681 0.1621 0.1613 0.1605 0.1589 2,0.1581 3,0.1513 0.1497 2,0.1489 0.1481 2,0.1473 7,0.1405 2,0.1397 3,0.1389 2,0.1381 6,0.1373 0.1349 7,0.1297 2,0.1289 3,0.1281 7,0.1273 0.1265 0.1257 9,0.1189 0.1181 3,0.1173 5,0.1165 2,0.1157 6,0.1081 3,0.1073 2,0.1065 5,0.1057 16,0.0973 5,0.0965 6,0.0957 4,0.0949 18,0.0865 4,0.0857 9,0.0849 0.0841 26,0.0757 9,0.0749 9,0.0741 45,0.0649 12,0.0641 7,0.0633 79,0.0541 4,0.0533 0.0525 54,0.0433 3,0.0425 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 87 of 203 RDF43 Potato, Proc. NB= PB, PDA vs. GFA, 1,759 " detects" [ MRID Nos 43299002/ 43385001] Estimated Max % CT = 24% TOTALZ= 5570 1266,0.0325 1.2073 1.1401 0.6681 0.6465 0.6253 0.5701 0.5381 0.5169 0.3981 0.3889 0.3873 0.3757 0.3409 0.3385 0.3225 0.3101 0.3093 0.3009 0.2985 0.2917 0.2885 0.2809 0.2793 0.2701 0.2685 0.2661 0.2637 0.2637 0.2577 0.2569 0.2553 0.2529 0.2477 0.2429 0.2361 0.2345 3,0.2321 0.2269 2,0.2261 0.2245 2,0.2229 0.2221 0.2161 2,0.2153 0.2145 0.2121 0.2105 0.2097 0.2037 2,0.2029 2,0.2013 0.1945 3,0.1937 0.1921 0.1905 0.1897 3,0.1837 0.1829 0.1821 2,0.1813 4,0.1805 2,0.1789 2,0.1729 2,0.1721 2,0.1713 2,0.1689 2,0.1681 0.1621 0.1613 0.1605 0.1589 2,0.1581 3,0.1513 0.1497 2,0.1489 0.1481 2,0.1473 7,0.1405 2,0.1397 3,0.1389 2,0.1381 6,0.1373 0.1349 7,0.1297 2,0.1289 3,0.1281 7,0.1273 0.1265 0.1257 9,0.1189 0.1181 3,0.1173 5,0.1165 2,0.1157 6,0.1081 3,0.1073 2,0.1065 5,0.1057 16,0.0973 5,0.0965 6,0.0957 4,0.0949 18,0.0865 4,0.0857 9,0.0849 0.0841 26,0.0757 9,0.0749 9,0.0741 45,0.0649 12,0.0641 7,0.0633 79,0.0541 4,0.0533 0.0525 54,0.0433 3,0.0425 RDF44: Potato, PB, processed. Farmgate Monitoring, PNW + FL, 104 composites Estimated Max. % CT = 24% TOTALZ= 329 0.42877 0.31665 0.29901 0.25089 0.19793 0.15878 0.15117 0.14725 0.12582 0.12486 0.12293 0.11565 0.11258 0.09726 0.08946 0.0863 0.08429 0.07458 0.0703 0.06706 0.06497 0.06382 0.06329 0.06166 0.06058 0.06053 0.0595 0.05734 2,0.05518 0.0541 0.05405 0.05302 0.05017 0.04978 0.04973 2,0.0487 0.04762 0.04654 0.04546 0.0433 0.04045 0.03677 2,0.03569 0.03461 34,0.0325 0.03029 0.02921 0.02813 2,0.02597 2,0.02489 0.02381 2,0.02273 13,0.01625 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 88 of 203 RDF45: Potato, PB, fresh, PDP Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 342 composites Estimated Max % CT= 5% TOTALZ= 6498 0.172925 0.151125 0.107045 0.090245 0.087445 2,0.059525 0.048725 0.043325 0.036745 0.035665 0.030265 8,0.012985 322,0.007585 RDF46: Potato, NB, fresh, PDP Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 160 individuals Estimated Max % CT= 5% TOTALZ= 3040 0.402325 0.315725 0.265525 0.259325 0.246325 0.234325 0.226925 0.209525 0.183725 0.179885 0.169725 0.157125 0.140525 0.123445 0.109325 0.101605 0.087485 0.086525 0.084365 0.082685 0.080045 0.077885 0.077765 2,0.076805 0.073565 0.072005 2,0.071405 0.070325 0.069485 0.068165 0.066985 0.066365 0.064885 0.062765 0.061585 0.060725 5,0.057933 0.056185 0.053285 0.053285 2,0.053045 0.051965 0.050885 0.048625 0.046565 0.046465 0.045385 0.044305 0.042245 3,0.041165 0.041065 0.034585 0.033605 0.032938 0.032425 0.031085 0.029485 0.028205 0.027125 3,0.027025 2,0.025945 0.023785 0.022705 0.021625 0.020545 0.019465 0.018485 0.018385 2,0.016253 14,0.012985 64,0.007585 RDF47: Potato, PB, processed, PDP Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 342 composites Estimated Max % CT= 24% TOTALZ= 1083 0.172925 0.151125 0.107045 0.090245 0.087445 2,0.059525 0.048725 0.043325 0.036745 0.035665 0.030265 8,0.012985 322,0.007585 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 89 of 203 RDF48: Potato, PB, fresh, PDP Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 342 composites Assuming aldicarb per se = 0 ppm Estimated Max % CT= 5% TOTALZ= 6498 0.170000 0.148200 0.104120 0.087320 0.084520 2,0.056600 0.045800 0.040400 0.033820 0.032740 0.027340 8,0.010060 322,0.004660 RDF49: Potato, NB, fresh, PDP Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 160 individuals Assuming aldicarb per se = 0 Estimated Max % CT= 5% TOTALZ= 3040 0.3994 0.3128 0.2626 0.2564 0.2434 0.2314 0.224 0.2066 0.1808 0.17696 0.1668 0.1542 0.1376 0.12052 0.1064 0.09868 0.08456 0.0836 0.08144 0.07976 0.07712 0.07496 0.07484 2,0.07388 0.07064 0.06908 2,0.06848 0.0674 0.06656 0.06524 0.06406 0.06344 0.06196 0.05984 0.05866 0.0578 5,0.055008 0.05326 2,0.05036 2,0.05012 0.04904 0.04796 0.0457 0.04364 0.04354 0.04246 0.04138 0.03932 3,0.03824 0.03814 0.03166 0.03068 0.030013 0.0295 0.02816 0.02656 0.02528 0.0242 3,0.0241 2,0.02302 0.02086 0.01978 0.0187 0.01762 0.01654 0.01556 0.01546 2,0.013328 14,0.01006 64,0.00466 RDF50: Potato, PB, processed, PDP Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 342 composites Assuming aldicarb per se = 0 ppm Estimated Max % CT= 24% TOTALZ= 1083 0.170000 0.148200 0.104120 0.087320 0.084520 2,0.056600 0.045800 0.040400 0.033820 0.032740 0.027340 8,0.010060 322,0.004660 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 90 of 203 RDF51: Sweet Potato Composites, Field Trial Data Estimated Max % CT = 37% TOTALZ= 91 22,0.005 0.009 0.011 2,0.01625 0.044814 0.055458 0.043042 0.031062 0.035182 0.027486 0.015154 0.011642 0.011714 0.022134 0.014144 0.006242 0.022334 0.011390 0.011622 0.013978 0.012330 0.014286 0.013986 0.021702 0.035966 0.020234 0.014490 0.016518 0.016042 0.014902 0.019346 0.015450 RDF52: Sweet Potato, Single Unit Residue Values, Field Trials Estimated Max % CT = 37% TOTALZ= 91 2,0.02125 27,0.01625 0.13645 0.12953 0.11425 0.11193 0.11009 0.07561 0.07217 0.06473 0.05885 0.05785 0.05665 0.05577 0.05197 0.05045 0.04937 0.04645 0.03613 0.03605 0.03413 0.03245 0.02873 0.02597 0.02489 0.02273 0.02165 RDF53: Sweet Potato, Composite Samples, USDA PDP Monitoring Data Estimated Max. % CT= 37% TOTALZ= 769 446,0.026279 0.146240 0.182280 0.102680 0.040040 0.025880 0.025880 RDF54: Sweet Potato, Composite Samples, USDA PDP Monitoring Data, Sensitivity Analysis Estimated Max. % CT= 37% TOTALZ= 1215 0.146240 0.182280 0.102680 0.040040 0.025880 0.025880 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 91 of 203 RDF55: Sweet Potato, NB From PDP Potato Monitoring Data, 1997 Study, 160 tubers Estimated Max % CT= 37% TOTALZ= 272 0.402325 0.315725 0.265525 0.259325 0.246325 0.234325 0.226925 0.209525 0.183725 0.179885 0.169725 0.157125 0.140525 0.123445 0.109325 0.101605 0.087485 0.086525 0.084365 0.082685 0.080045 0.077885 0.077765 2,0.076805 0.073565 0.072005 2,0.071405 0.070325 0.069485 0.068165 0.066985 0.066365 0.064885 0.062765 0.061585 0.060725 5,0.057933 0.056185 0.053285 0.053285 2,0.053045 0.051965 0.050885 0.048625 0.046565 0.046465 0.045385 0.044305 0.042245 3,0.041165 0.041065 0.034585 0.033605 0.032938 0.032425 0.031085 0.029485 0.028205 0.027125 3,0.027025 2,0.025945 0.023785 0.022705 0.021625 0.020545 0.019465 0.018485 0.018385 2,0.016253 14,0.012985 64,0.007585 RDF56: Sweet Potato, PB, PDP Potato Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 342 composites Estimated Max % CT= 37% TOTALZ= 582 0.172925 0.151125 0.107045 0.090245 0.087445 2,0.059525 0.048725 0.043325 0.036745 0.035665 0.030265 8,0.012985 322,0.007585 RDF57: Sweet Potato, NB From PDP Potato Monitoring Data, 1997 Study, 160 tubers Assuming aldicarb per se = 0 ppm Estimated Max % CT= 37% TOTALZ= 272 0.3994 0.3128 0.2626 0.2564 0.2434 0.2314 0.224 0.2066 0.1808 0.17696 0.1668 0.1542 0.1376 0.12052 0.1064 0.09868 0.08456 0.0836 0.08144 0.07976 0.07712 0.07496 0.07484 2,0.07388 0.07064 0.06908 2,0.06848 0.0674 0.06656 0.06524 0.06406 0.06344 0.06196 0.05984 0.05866 0.0578 5,0.055008 0.05326 2,0.05036 2,0.05012 0.04904 0.04796 0.0457 0.04364 0.04354 0.04246 0.04138 0.03932 3,0.03824 0.03814 0.03166 0.03068 0.030013 0.0295 0.02816 0.02656 0.02528 0.0242 3,0.0241 2,0.02302 0.02086 0.01978 0.0187 0.01762 0.01654 0.01556 0.01546 2,0.013328 14,0.01006 64,0.00466 RDF58: Sweet Potato, PB, PDP Potato Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 342 composites Assuming aldicarb per se = 0 Estimated Max % CT= 37% TOTALZ= 582 Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 92 of 203 0.170000 0.148200 0.104120 0.087320 0.084520 2,0.056600 0.045800 0.040400 0.033820 0.032740 0.027340 8,0.010060 322,0.004660 RDF59: Bananas, proposed use Estimated Market Share = 45% TOTALZ= 55 45,0.0069 RDF60: Potato, PB, fresh, PDP Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 342 composites Assuming aldicarb per se = 0 ppm; Shorter PHI in PNW Estimated Max % CT= 9% TOTALZ= 3458 0.170000 0.148200 0.104120 0.087320 0.084520 2,0.056600 0.045800 0.040400 0.033820 0.032740 0.027340 8,0.010060 322,0.004660 RDF61: Potato, NB, fresh, PDP Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 160 individuals Assuming aldicarb per se = 0 ppm; Shorter PHI in PNW Estimated Max % CT= 9% TOTALZ= 1618 0.3994 0.3128 0.2626 0.2564 0.2434 0.2314 0.224 0.2066 0.1808 0.17696 0.1668 0.1542 0.1376 0.12052 0.1064 0.09868 0.08456 0.0836 0.08144 0.07976 0.07712 0.07496 0.07484 2,0.07388 0.07064 0.06908 2,0.06848 0.0674 0.06656 0.06524 0.06406 0.06344 0.06196 0.05984 0.05866 0.0578 5,0.055008 0.05326 2,0.05036 2,0.05012 0.04904 0.04796 0.0457 0.04364 0.04354 0.04246 0.04138 0.03932 3,0.03824 0.03814 0.03166 0.03068 0.030013 0.0295 0.02816 0.02656 0.02528 0.0242 3,0.0241 2,0.02302 0.02086 0.01978 0.0187 0.01762 0.01654 0.01556 0.01546 2,0.013328 14,0.01006 64,0.00466 RDF62: Potato, PB, processed, PDP Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 342 composites Assuming aldicarb per se = 0 ppm; Shorter PHI in PNW Estimated Max % CT= 36% TOTALZ= 608 0.170000 0.148200 0.104120 0.087320 0.084520 2,0.056600 0.045800 0.040400 0.033820 0.032740 0.027340 8,0.010060 322,0.004660 RDF63: Potato, PB, fresh, PDP Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 342 composites Assuming aldicarb per se = 0 ppm; Six Midwestern States Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 93 of 203 Estimated Max % CT= 7% TOTALZ= 4544 0.170000 0.148200 0.104120 0.087320 0.084520 2,0.056600 0.045800 0.040400 0.033820 0.032740 0.027340 8,0.010060 322,0.004660 RDF64: Potato, NB, fresh, PDP Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 160 individuals Assuming aldicarb per se = 0 ppm; Six Midwestern States Estimated Max % CT= 7% TOTALZ= 2126 0.3994 0.3128 0.2626 0.2564 0.2434 0.2314 0.224 0.2066 0.1808 0.17696 0.1668 0.1542 0.1376 0.12052 0.1064 0.09868 0.08456 0.0836 0.08144 0.07976 0.07712 0.07496 0.07484 2,0.07388 0.07064 0.06908 2,0.06848 0.0674 0.06656 0.06524 0.06406 0.06344 0.06196 0.05984 0.05866 0.0578 5,0.055008 0.05326 2,0.05036 2,0.05012 0.04904 0.04796 0.0457 0.04364 0.04354 0.04246 0.04138 0.03932 3,0.03824 0.03814 0.03166 0.03068 0.030013 0.0295 0.02816 0.02656 0.02528 0.0242 3,0.0241 2,0.02302 0.02086 0.01978 0.0187 0.01762 0.01654 0.01556 0.01546 2,0.013328 14,0.01006 64,0.00466 RDF65: Potato, PB, processed, PDP Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 342 composites Assuming aldicarb per se = 0 ppm; Six Midwestern States Estimated Max % CT= 28% TOTALZ= 879 0.170000 0.148200 0.104120 0.087320 0.084520 2,0.056600 0.045800 0.040400 0.033820 0.032740 0.027340 8,0.010060 322,0.004660 RDF66: Potato, PB, fresh, PDP Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 342 composites Assuming aldicarb per se = 0 ppm; Shorter PHI + Six Midwestern States Estimated Max % CT= 10% TOTALZ= 3078 0.170000 0.148200 0.104120 0.087320 0.084520 2,0.056600 0.045800 0.040400 0.033820 0.032740 0.027340 8,0.010060 322,0.004660 RDF67: Potato, NB, fresh, PDP Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 160 individuals Assuming aldicarb per se = 0 ppm; Shorter PHI + Six Midwestern States Attachment 4. Summary of Aldicarb Residue Distribution Files ( RDFs) for Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis.

Page 94 of 203 Estimated Max % CT= 10% TOTALZ= 1440 0.3994 0.3128 0.2626 0.2564 0.2434 0.2314 0.224 0.2066 0.1808 0.17696 0.1668 0.1542 0.1376 0.12052 0.1064 0.09868 0.08456 0.0836 0.08144 0.07976 0.07712 0.07496 0.07484 2,0.07388 0.07064 0.06908 2,0.06848 0.0674 0.06656 0.06524 0.06406 0.06344 0.06196 0.05984 0.05866 0.0578 5,0.055008 0.05326 2,0.05036 2,0.05012 0.04904 0.04796 0.0457 0.04364 0.04354 0.04246 0.04138 0.03932 3,0.03824 0.03814 0.03166 0.03068 0.030013 0.0295 0.02816 0.02656 0.02528 0.0242 3,0.0241 2,0.02302 0.02086 0.01978 0.0187 0.01762 0.01654 0.01556 0.01546 2,0.013328 14,0.01006 64,0.00466 RDF68: Potato, PB, processed, PDP Monitoring Data, 1997 Special Study, 342 composites Assuming aldicarb per se = 0 ppm; Shorter PHI + Six Midwestern States Estimated Max % CT= 40% TOTALZ= 513 0.170000 0.148200 0.104120 0.087320 0.084520 2,0.056600 0.045800 0.040400 0.033820 0.032740 0.027340 8,0.010060 322,0.004660 Attachment 5 Existing Registrations .

Page 95 of 203 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID Acute analysis for ALDICARB Residue file name: C:\$ MyFiles\ Aldicarb Dietary\ dietary Apr 2006\ existing registrations 5. R98 Analysis Date 04 19 2006 Residue file dated: 04 19 2006/ 16: 43: 56/ 8 Reference dose ( aRfD) = 0.0005 mg/ kg bw/ day  RDL indices and parameters for Monte Carlo Analysis: Index Dist Parameter # 1 Param # 2 Param # 3 Comment # Code       1 6 27GFctff. rdf 2 6 28GFctfp. rdf 3 6 34LEctff. rdf 4 6 33LIctff. rdf 5 6 16OGctff. rdf 6 6 17OGctfp. rdf 7 6 1Pecanft. rdf 8 6 46POmnfr. rdf 9 6 47POmppr. rdf 10 6 55SWmssp. rdf 11 6 56SWmcsp. rdf EPA Crop Food Name Def Res Adj. Factors RDL Code Grp ( ppm) # 1 # 2 Pntr        06030300 6C Bean, black, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030320 6C Bean, broad, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030340 6C Bean, cowpea, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030350 6C Bean, great northern, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030360 6C Bean, kidney, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030380 6C Bean, lima, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030390 6C Bean, mung, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030400 6C Bean, navy, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030410 6C Bean, pink, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030420 6C Bean, pinto, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030980 6C Chickpea, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030981 6C Chickpea, seed babyfood 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030990 6C Chickpea, flour 0.000200 0.050 1.000 95001150 O Coffee, roasted bean 0.002000 1.000 1.000 95001160 O Coffee, instant 0.002000 1.000 1.000 95001280 O Cottonseed, oil 0.000495 1.000 1.000 95001281 O Cottonseed, oil babyfood 0.000495 1.000 1.000 10001800 10 Grapefruit 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000747 1.000 1.000 1 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000747 1.000 1.000 1 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000922 1.000 1.000 2 10001810 10 Grapefruit, juice 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000747 0.014 1.000 1 120 Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000922 0.014 1.000 2 130 Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000747 0.014 1.000 1 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.000747 0.014 1.000 1 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000922 0.014 1.000 2 06031820 6C Guar, seed 0.000200 1.000 1.000 06031821 6C Guar, seed babyfood 0.000200 1.000 1.000 10001990 10 Lemon 0.000074 1.000 1.000 3 10002000 10 Lemon, juice 0.000074 0.460 1.000 3 10002001 10 Lemon, juice babyfood 0.000074 0.460 1.000 3 10002010 10 Lemon, peel 0.000074 1.000 1.000 3 06032030 6C Lentil, seed 0.000200 1.000 1.000 10002060 10 Lime 0.000200 1.000 1.000 4 10002070 10 Lime, juice 0.000200 0.460 1.000 4 10002071 10 Lime, juice babyfood 0.000200 0.460 1.000 4 Attachment 5 Existing Registrations .

Page 96 of 203 10002400 10 Orange 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000440 1.000 1.000 6 10002410 10 Orange, juice 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 0.580 1.000 5 120 Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000440 0.580 1.000 6 130 Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 0.580 1.000 5 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 0.580 1.000 5 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.000374 0.580 1.000 5 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.000374 0.580 1.000 5 221 Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.000440 0.580 1.000 6 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000440 0.580 1.000 6 10002411 10 Orange, juice babyfood 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000440 0.580 1.000 6 10002420 10 Orange, peel 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000440 1.000 1.000 6 06032560 6C Pea, dry 0.000200 1.000 1.000 06032561 6C Pea, dry babyfood 0.000200 1.000 1.000 06032580 6C Pea, pigeon, seed 0.000200 1.000 1.000 95002630 O Peanut 0.002585 1.000 1.000 95002640 O Peanut, butter 0.002585 1.890 1.000 95002650 O Peanut, oil 0.000705 1.000 1.000 14002690 14 Pecan 0.061400 1.000 1.000 7 01032960 1C Potato, chips 0.002503 1.000 1.000 01032970 1C Potato, dry ( granules/ flakes) 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.002503 0.300 1.000 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.002503 0.150 1.000 213 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried 0.002503 0.190 1.000 214 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried/ baked 0.002503 0.190 1.000 221 Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.002503 0.300 1.000 230 Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 0.002503 0.300 1.000 232 Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.002503 0.150 1.000 01032971 1C Potato, dry ( granules/ flakes) b 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.002503 0.300 1.000 01032980 1C Potato, flour 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.002503 0.300 1.000 120 Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/ S 0.002503 0.300 1.000 130 Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 0.002503 0.300 1.000 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.002503 0.300 1.000 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.002503 0.300 1.000 Attachment 5 Existing Registrations .

Page 97 of 203 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.002503 0.150 1.000 213 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried 0.002503 0.190 1.000 214 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried/ baked 0.002503 0.190 1.000 215 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled/ baked 0.002503 0.150 1.000 220 Cooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/ S 0.002503 0.300 1.000 221 Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.002503 0.300 1.000 222 Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 0.002503 0.150 1.000 223 Cooked; Frozen; Fried 0.002503 0.190 1.000 230 Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 0.002503 0.300 1.000 231 Cooked; Dried; Baked 0.002503 0.300 1.000 232 Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.002503 0.150 1.000 233 Cooked; Dried; Fried 0.002503 0.190 1.000 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.002503 0.300 1.000 242 Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.002503 0.150 1.000 250 Cooked; Cured etc; Cook Meth N/ S 0.002503 0.300 1.000 251 Cooked; Cured etc; Baked 0.002503 0.300 1.000 252 Cooked; Cured etc; Boiled 0.002503 0.150 1.000 253 Cooked; Cured etc; Fried 0.002503 0.190 1.000 01032981 1C Potato, flour babyfood 0.002503 1.000 1.000 01032990 1C Potato, tuber, w/ peel 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.010430 0.500 1.000 8 213 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried 0.010430 0.620 1.000 8 01032991 1C Potato, tuber, w/ peel babyfood 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 01033000 1C Potato, tuber, w/ o peel 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 213 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 221 Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.010430 1.000 1.000 9 223 Cooked; Frozen; Fried 0.010430 1.000 1.000 9 232 Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.010430 0.500 1.000 8 233 Cooked; Dried; Fried 0.010430 0.620 1.000 8 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.010430 0.500 1.000 9 242 Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.010430 0.500 1.000 9 252 Cooked; Cured etc; Boiled 0.010430 0.500 1.000 8 253 Cooked; Cured etc; Fried 0.010430 0.620 1.000 8 01033001 1C Potato, tuber, w/ o peel babyfood 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.010430 1.000 1.000 9 06003470 6 Soybean, seed 0.000100 1.000 1.000 06003480 6 Soybean, flour 0.000100 1.000 1.000 06003481 6 Soybean, flour babyfood 0.000100 1.000 1.000 06003490 6 Soybean, soy milk 0.000100 1.000 1.000 06003491 6 Soybean, soy milk babyfood or in 0.000100 1.000 1.000 06003500 6 Soybean, oil 0.000050 1.000 1.000 06003501 6 Soybean, oil babyfood 0.000050 1.000 1.000 01033660 1CD Sweet potato 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.004238 1.000 1.000 10 Attachment 5 Existing Registrations .

Page 98 of 203 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.004238 1.000 1.000 10 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.004238 0.500 1.000 10 213 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried 0.004238 0.620 1.000 10 215 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled/ baked 0.004238 0.500 1.000 10 242 Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.004238 0.500 1.000 11 245 Cooked; Canned; Boiled/ baked 0.004238 0.500 1.000 11 01033661 1CD Sweet potato babyfood 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.004238 1.000 1.000 10 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.004238 1.000 1.000 11 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID ACUTE Analysis for ALDICARB ( 1994 98 data) Residue file: existing registrations 5. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 NOT used. Analysis Date: 04 19 2006/ 17: 50: 12 Residue file dated: 04 19 2006/ 16: 43: 56/ 8 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. MC iterations = 1000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 10 Run Comment: RAT RBC ===============================================================================

Summary calculations ( per capita):

95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD       U. S. Population: 0.000009 1.79 0.000051 10.16 0.000358 71.63 All infants: 0.000007 1.39 0.000065 12.96 0.000463 92.52 Children 1 2 yrs: 0.000023 4.67 0.000108 21.52 0.000797 159.45 Children 3 5 yrs: 0.000021 4.19 0.000088 17.60 0.000643 128.52 Children 6 12 yrs: 0.000013 2.70 0.000061 12.16 0.000457 91.38 Youth 13 19 yrs: 0.000009 1.88 0.000043 8.52 0.000312 62.48 Adults 20 49 yrs: 0.000007 1.44 0.000039 7.85 0.000298 59.56 Adults 50+ yrs: 0.000006 1.19 0.000054 10.78 0.000320 64.06 Females 13 49 yrs: 0.000007 1.31 0.000038 7.60 0.000282 56.40 Attachment 5 Existing Registrations .

Page 99 of 203 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID ACUTE Analysis for ALDICARB ( 1994 98 data) Residue file: existing registrations 5. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 NOT used. Analysis Date: 04 19 2006/ 19: 04: 11 Residue file dated: 04 19 2006/ 17: 00: 47/ 8 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. MC iterations = 1000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 10 Run Comment: RAT Brain =============================================================================== Summary calculations ( per capita):

95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD       U. S. Population: 0.000009 1.19 0.000051 6.77 0.000358 47.75 All infants: 0.000007 0.93 0.000065 8.64 0.000463 61.68 Children 1 2 yrs: 0.000023 3.11 0.000108 14.35 0.000797 106.30 Children 3 5 yrs: 0.000021 2.79 0.000088 11.73 0.000643 85.68 Children 6 12 yrs: 0.000013 1.80 0.000061 8.11 0.000457 60.92 Youth 13 19 yrs: 0.000009 1.25 0.000043 5.68 0.000312 41.65 Adults 20 49 yrs: 0.000007 0.96 0.000039 5.23 0.000298 39.71 Adults 50+ yrs: 0.000006 0.79 0.000054 7.19 0.000320 42.71 Females 13 49 yrs: 0.000007 0.87 0.000038 5.07 0.000282 37.60 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID ACUTE Analysis for ALDICARB ( 1994 98 data) Residue file: existing registrations 5. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 NOT used. Analysis Date: 04 20 2006/ 14: 10: 39 Residue file dated: 04 19 2006/ 16: 53: 57/ 8 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. MC iterations = 1000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 10 Run Comment: Human RBC =============================================================================== Summary calculations ( per capita):

95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD       U. S. Population: 0.000009 1.38 0.000051 7.82 0.000358 55.10 All infants: 0.000007 1.07 0.000065 9.97 0.000463 71.17 Children 1 2 yrs: 0.000023 3.59 0.000108 16.55 0.000797 122.65 Children 3 5 yrs: 0.000021 3.22 0.000088 13.54 0.000643 98.86 Children 6 12 yrs: 0.000013 2.08 0.000061 9.36 0.000457 70.29 Youth 13 19 yrs: 0.000009 1.44 0.000043 6.56 0.000312 48.06 Adults 20 49 yrs: 0.000007 1.11 0.000039 6.04 0.000298 45.82 Adults 50+ yrs: 0.000006 0.91 0.000054 8.29 0.000320 49.28 Females 13 49 yrs: 0.000007 1.00 0.000038 5.85 0.000282 43.38 Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEMJ Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm. .

Page 100 of 203 Analysis 2: Summary of Orange, Grapefruit, and Potato Residue Inputs for Aldicarb Acute Dietary Exposure [ Sensitivity Analysis  Assumes Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm in Citrus and Potatoes]

Commodity 1 Food Form ( FF) 2 Classifica tion 3 F/ P 4 % CT ( A/ M) 5 Data Source 6 Acute RDF ( RDF #) 7 Uncooked PB F Cooked ( NFS) PB F 7/ 13 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 36LOD+ 347Z ( 18)

Canned ( NFS) PB P Oranges Juice Frozen ( NFS) PB P 11/ 23 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 76LOD+ 307Z ( 19)

Oranges  Juice Conc. All 7 food forms PB P 11/ 23 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 76LOD+ 307Z ( 19)

Uncooked PB F Cooked ( NFS) PB F Boiled PB F 7/ 13 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 36LOD+ 347Z ( 18)

Canned ( NFS) PB P Oranges  Peel Frozen ( NFS) PB P 11/ 23 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 76LOD+ 307Z ( 19)

Uncooked NB F Cooked ( NFS) NB F 7/ 13 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 36LOD+ 347Z ( 18) Oranges  Peeled Fruit Canned ( NFS) PB P 11/ 23 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 76LOD+ 307Z ( 19)

Uncooked PB F Boiled PB F 16/ 25 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 37LOD+ 160Z ( 29)

Canned ( NFS) PB P Grapefruit  Juice Frozen PB P 17/ 33 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 37LOD+ 109Z ( 30)

Grapefruit  Juice Conc. Frozen ( NFS) PB P 17/ 33 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 37LOD+ 109Z ( 30)

Grapefruit  Peel Peel PB F 16/ 25 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 37LOD+ 160Z ( 29)

Uncooked NB F Cooked ( NFS) NB F Boiled NB F 16/ 25 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 37LOD+ 160Z ( 29) Grapefruit  Peeled Fruit Canned ( NFS) PB P 17/ 33 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 54LOD+ 92Z ( 30)

Cooked ( NFS) B P Baked B P Boiled B P Fried B P Canned ( NFS) B P Canned: Boiled B P Potatoes/ whitedry Frozen: Cooked B P 17/ 24 PDP Special Survey ( composites) 0.001732 Cooked ( NFS) NB F Potatoes/ whitepeeled Uncooked NB F 4/ 5 PDP Special Survey 160 Det.+ 3040Z ( 49) Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEMJ Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm. .

Page 101 of 203 Analysis 2: Summary of Orange, Grapefruit, and Potato Residue Inputs for Aldicarb Acute Dietary Exposure [ Sensitivity Analysis  Assumes Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm in Citrus and Potatoes]

Commodity 1 Food Form ( FF) 2 Classifica tion 3 F/ P 4 % CT ( A/ M) 5 Data Source 6 Acute RDF ( RDF #) 7 Baked NB F Boiled NB F Fried NB F ( single units)

Canned: Cooked PB P Canned: Boiled PB P Frozen: Cooked PB P Frozen: Baked PB P Frozen: Fried PB P 17/ 24 PDP Special Survey ( composites) 342 Det.+ 1083Z ( 50)

Baked NB F Potatoes/ whitepeel only Fried NB F 4/ 5 PDP Special Survey ( single units) 160 Det.+ 3040Z ( 49)

Potatoes/ whiteunspec Canned ( NFS) PB P 17/ 24 PDP Special Survey ( composites) 342 Det.+ 1083Z ( 50)

Uncooked NB F Cooked ( NFS) NB F Baked NB F Boiled NB F Fried NB F 4/ 5 PDP Special Survey ( single units) 160 Det.+ 3040Z ( 49) Potatoes/ whitewhole Canned ( NFS) PB P 17/ 24 PDP Special Survey ( composites) 342 Det.+ 1083Z ( 50)

1 The reassessed tolerances are: 0.3 ppm in orange and grapefruit; and 0.2 ppm in potatoes. 2 Food forms shown in the table are taken directly from the DEEM software. 3 Refer to HED SOP99.6. NB = Not Blended; PB = Partially Blended; B = Blended. 4 F = Fresh commodity; P = Processed commodity. 5 BEAD estimated percent crop treated; M = estimated Maximum ( for acute exposure). 6 CTF = Carbamate Task Force. 7 RDF = Residue Distribution File. Det. = detect; LOD = residues at 2 LOD; Z = zeroes. Numbered RDFs are shown in detail in Attachment 4. For dried potatoes, a point estimate AR was used. Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEMJ Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

.

Analysis 2: Residue Inputs for Aldicarb Acute Dietary Exposure Analyses ( Except Orange, Grapefruit and Potato).

[ Sensitivity Analysis  Assumes Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm in Citrus and Potatoes]

% CT 2 Commodity/ Reassessed Tol. 1 Ave. Max. Data Source 3 Commodity Classifica tion 4 Food Forms 5 Acute RDF 6 ( RDF #) Acute AR 7 Beans ( dry)/ 0.1 1 2 FT B Baked, boiled, fried,

canned: cooked;

canned: boiled;

cooked: NFS N/ A 0.000200 Coffee Beans/ 0.1 20 20 FT/ PS B Boiled; cooked: NFS N/ A 0.002 Cottonseed/ 0.

1 27 33 FT/ PS B Cottonseed meal N/ A 0.016995 B Cottonseed oil N/ A 0.000495 Lemon/ 0.3 1 3 CTF PB Peeled fruit:

uncooked; cooked;

canned, NFS; Peel:

uncooked, baked,

boiled, canned,

frozen; Juice: canned,

frozen Juice concentrate:

frozen, cooked, baked,

boiled, canned 16 Det.+ 37LOD+ 1,725Z ( 36) N/ A Limes/ 0.3 4 7 CTF PB Peeled fruit; Peel:

baked, boiled; Juice:

uncooked, canned,

frozen; Juice concentrate: cooked,

frozen 16 Det.+ 37LOD+ 709Z ( 35) N/ A Peanuts 30 47 FT B Peanuts, hulled;

Peanuts  butter; N/ A 0.002585 Peanuts, oil N/ A 0.000705 Pecans/ 0.5 4 8 FT PB Unbaked, baked, boiled 22 detects + 253Z ( 1) N/ A Sorghum,

grain/ 0.2 0 ( 1) 0 ( 1) FT B Boiled N/ A 0.002 Soybeans/ 0.02 0 ( 1) 0 ( 1) FT B Soybean flour ( defatted, full fat);

mature seeds, dry;

protein isolate; N/ A 0.0001 Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEMJ Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

.

Analysis 2: Residue Inputs for Aldicarb Acute Dietary Exposure Analyses ( Except Orange, Grapefruit and Potato).

[ Sensitivity Analysis  Assumes Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm in Citrus and Potatoes]

% CT 2 Commodity/ Reassessed Tol. 1 Ave. Max. Data Source 3 Commodity Classifica tion 4 Food Forms 5 Acute RDF 6 ( RDF #) Acute AR 7 sprouted seeds)

B soybean oil N/ A 0.00005 Sugarcane/ 0.0 2 0 ( 1) 0 ( 1) FT B Sugar cane, refined;

sugar cane/ molasses N/ A N/ A Sugar beets/ 0.05 9 11 FT B Sugar beet, refined;

sugar beet/ molasses N/ A N/ A Sweet potato/ 0.1 15 37 PDP potato ( single s) NB Cooked, baked, boiled,

fried 160 Det.+ 272Z ( 57) N/ A PDP Composi tes PB Canned ( NFS, cooked,

boiled) 342 Det.+ 582Z ( 58) N/ A 1 The relevant commodities are shown along with the reassessed tolerances from the 6/ 2/ 00 Residue Chemistry Chapter.

2 BEAD estimated percent crop treated; Max. = estimated Maximum ( for acute exposure).

3 FT = Field Trials; PS = Processing Study; CTF = Carbamate Task Force; PDP = USDA Pesticide Data Program ( monitoring data).

4 Refer to HED SOP99.6. NB = Not Blended; PB = Partially Blended; B = Blended.

5 Food forms shown in the table are taken directly from the DEEM software.

6 RDF = Residue Distribution File. Det. = detect; LOD = residues at 2 LOD; Z = zeroes. Numbered RDFs are shown in detail in Attachment 4.

7 For blended commodities, a point estimate was used for the acute analysis, with the % CT incorporated into the AR ( i. e.,

Adj. Factor 2 was set to 1). Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEM Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

Page 104 of 203 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID Acute analysis for ALDICARB Residue file name: C:\$ MyFiles\ Aldicarb Dietary\ dietary Apr 2006\ existing registrations aldicarb zero 6. R98 Analysis Date 04 19 2006 Residue file dated: 04 19 2006/ 16: 44: 22/ 8 Reference dose ( aRfD) = 0.0005 mg/ kg bw/ day  RDL indices and parameters for Monte Carlo Analysis: Index Dist Parameter # 1 Param # 2 Param # 3 Comment # Code       1 6 29GFctfs. rdf 2 6 30GFctps. rdf 3 6 36LEctfs. rdf 4 6 35LIctfs. rdf 5 6 18OGctfs. rdf 6 6 19OGctps. rdf 7 6 1Pecanft. rdf 8 6 49POmnfr. rdf 9 6 50POmppr. rdf 10 6 57SWmssp. rdf 11 6 58SWmcsp. rdf EPA Crop Food Name Def Res Adj. Factors RDL Code Grp ( ppm) # 1 # 2 Pntr        06030300 6C Bean, black, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030320 6C Bean, broad, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030340 6C Bean, cowpea, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030350 6C Bean, great northern, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030360 6C Bean, kidney, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030380 6C Bean, lima, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030390 6C Bean, mung, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030400 6C Bean, navy, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030410 6C Bean, pink, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030420 6C Bean, pinto, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030980 6C Chickpea, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030981 6C Chickpea, seed babyfood 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030990 6C Chickpea, flour 0.000200 0.050 1.000 95001150 O Coffee, roasted bean 0.002000 1.000 1.000 95001160 O Coffee, instant 0.002000 1.000 1.000 95001280 O Cottonseed, oil 0.000495 1.000 1.000 95001281 O Cottonseed, oil babyfood 0.000495 1.000 1.000 10001800 10 Grapefruit 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000747 1.000 1.000 1 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000747 1.000 1.000 1 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000922 1.000 1.000 2 10001810 10 Grapefruit, juice 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000747 0.014 1.000 1 120 Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000922 0.014 1.000 2 130 Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000747 0.014 1.000 1 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.000747 0.014 1.000 1 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000922 0.014 1.000 2 06031820 6C Guar, seed 0.000200 1.000 1.000 06031821 6C Guar, seed babyfood 0.000200 1.000 1.000 10001990 10 Lemon 0.000074 1.000 1.000 3 10002000 10 Lemon, juice 0.000074 0.460 1.000 3 10002001 10 Lemon, juice babyfood 0.000074 0.460 1.000 3 10002010 10 Lemon, peel 0.000074 1.000 1.000 3 Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEM Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

Page 105 of 203 06032030 6C Lentil, seed 0.000200 1.000 1.000 10002060 10 Lime 0.000200 1.000 1.000 4 10002070 10 Lime, juice 0.000200 0.460 1.000 4 10002071 10 Lime, juice babyfood 0.000200 0.460 1.000 4 10002400 10 Orange 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000440 1.000 1.000 6 10002410 10 Orange, juice 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 0.580 1.000 5 120 Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000440 0.580 1.000 6 130 Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 0.580 1.000 5 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 0.580 1.000 5 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.000374 0.580 1.000 5 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.000374 0.580 1.000 5 221 Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.000440 0.580 1.000 6 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000440 0.580 1.000 6 10002411 10 Orange, juice babyfood 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000440 0.580 1.000 6 10002420 10 Orange, peel 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000440 1.000 1.000 6 06032560 6C Pea, dry 0.000200 1.000 1.000 06032561 6C Pea, dry babyfood 0.000200 1.000 1.000 06032580 6C Pea, pigeon, seed 0.000200 1.000 1.000 95002630 O Peanut 0.002585 1.000 1.000 95002640 O Peanut, butter 0.002585 1.890 1.000 95002650 O Peanut, oil 0.000705 1.000 1.000 14002690 14 Pecan 0.061400 1.000 1.000 7 01032960 1C Potato, chips 0.001732 1.000 1.000 01032970 1C Potato, dry ( granules/ flakes) 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.001732 0.300 1.000 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.001732 0.150 1.000 213 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried 0.001732 0.190 1.000 214 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried/ baked 0.001732 0.190 1.000 221 Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.001732 0.300 1.000 230 Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 232 Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.001732 0.150 1.000 01032971 1C Potato, dry ( granules/ flakes) b 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 01032980 1C Potato, flour 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 120 Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 130 Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEM Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

Page 106 of 203 0.001732 0.300 1.000 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.001732 0.300 1.000 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.001732 0.150 1.000 213 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried 0.001732 0.190 1.000 214 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried/ baked 0.001732 0.190 1.000 215 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled/ baked 0.001732 0.150 1.000 220 Cooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 221 Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.001732 0.300 1.000 222 Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 0.001732 0.150 1.000 223 Cooked; Frozen; Fried 0.001732 0.190 1.000 230 Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 231 Cooked; Dried; Baked 0.001732 0.300 1.000 232 Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.001732 0.150 1.000 233 Cooked; Dried; Fried 0.001732 0.190 1.000 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 242 Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.001732 0.150 1.000 250 Cooked; Cured etc; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 251 Cooked; Cured etc; Baked 0.001732 0.300 1.000 252 Cooked; Cured etc; Boiled 0.001732 0.150 1.000 253 Cooked; Cured etc; Fried 0.001732 0.190 1.000 01032981 1C Potato, flour babyfood 0.001732 1.000 1.000 01032990 1C Potato, tuber, w/ peel 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.010430 0.500 1.000 8 213 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried 0.010430 0.620 1.000 8 01032991 1C Potato, tuber, w/ peel babyfood 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 01033000 1C Potato, tuber, w/ o peel 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 213 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 221 Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.010430 1.000 1.000 9 223 Cooked; Frozen; Fried 0.010430 1.000 1.000 9 232 Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.010430 0.500 1.000 8 233 Cooked; Dried; Fried 0.010430 0.620 1.000 8 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.010430 0.500 1.000 9 242 Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.010430 0.500 1.000 9 252 Cooked; Cured etc; Boiled 0.010430 0.500 1.000 8 253 Cooked; Cured etc; Fried 0.010430 0.620 1.000 8 01033001 1C Potato, tuber, w/ o peel babyfood 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.010430 1.000 1.000 9 06003470 6 Soybean, seed 0.000100 1.000 1.000 06003480 6 Soybean, flour 0.000100 1.000 1.000 06003481 6 Soybean, flour babyfood 0.000100 1.000 1.000 06003490 6 Soybean, soy milk 0.000100 1.000 1.000 06003491 6 Soybean, soy milk babyfood or in 0.000100 1.000 1.000 06003500 6 Soybean, oil 0.000050 1.000 1.000 Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEM Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

Page 107 of 203 06003501 6 Soybean, oil babyfood 0.000050 1.000 1.000 01033660 1CD Sweet potato 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.004238 1.000 1.000 10 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.004238 1.000 1.000 10 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.004238 0.500 1.000 10 213 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried 0.004238 0.620 1.000 10 215 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled/ baked 0.004238 0.500 1.000 10 242 Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.004238 0.500 1.000 11 245 Cooked; Canned; Boiled/ baked 0.004238 0.500 1.000 11 01033661 1CD Sweet potato babyfood 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.004238 1.000 1.000 10 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.004238 1.000 1.000 11 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID ACUTE Analysis for ALDICARB ( 1994 98 data) Residue file: existing registrations aldicarb zero 6. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 NOT used. Analysis Date: 04 19 2006/ 17: 57: 38 Residue file dated: 04 19 2006/ 16: 44: 22/ 8 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. MC iterations = 1000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 10 Run Comment: RAT RBC ===============================================================================

Summary calculations ( per capita):

95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD       U. S. Population: 0.000007 1.32 0.000044 8.88 0.000349 69.71 All infants: 0.000005 1.01 0.000042 8.32 0.000443 88.64 Children 1 2 yrs: 0.000017 3.41 0.000093 18.63 0.000773 154.66 Children 3 5 yrs: 0.000015 3.05 0.000077 15.36 0.000623 124.70 Children 6 12 yrs: 0.000010 1.97 0.000052 10.50 0.000443 88.58 Youth 13 19 yrs: 0.000006 1.28 0.000035 6.99 0.000304 60.85 Adults 20 49 yrs: 0.000005 1.01 0.000035 6.99 0.000290 58.01 Adults 50+ yrs: 0.000004 0.89 0.000051 10.13 0.000314 62.89 Females 13 49 yrs: 0.000005 0.92 0.000033 6.52 0.000274 54.85 Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEM Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

Page 108 of 203 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID ACUTE Analysis for ALDICARB ( 1994 98 data) Residue file: existing registrations aldicarb zero 6. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 NOT used. Analysis Date: 04 20 2006/ 10: 55: 14 Residue file dated: 04 19 2006/ 17: 01: 09/ 8 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. MC iterations = 1000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 10 Run Comment: RAT Brain ===============================================================================

Summary calculations ( per capita):

95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD       U. S. Population: 0.000007 0.88 0.000044 5.92 0.000349 46.47 All infants: 0.000005 0.67 0.000042 5.54 0.000443 59.09 Children 1 2 yrs: 0.000017 2.27 0.000093 12.42 0.000773 103.11 Children 3 5 yrs: 0.000015 2.03 0.000077 10.24 0.000623 83.13 Children 6 12 yrs: 0.000010 1.31 0.000052 7.00 0.000443 59.06 Youth 13 19 yrs: 0.000006 0.85 0.000035 4.66 0.000304 40.56 Adults 20 49 yrs: 0.000005 0.67 0.000035 4.66 0.000290 38.67 Adults 50+ yrs: 0.000004 0.59 0.000051 6.76 0.000314 41.93 Females 13 49 yrs: 0.000005 0.62 0.000033 4.35 0.000274 36.57 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID ACUTE Analysis for ALDICARB ( 1994 98 data) Residue file: existing registrations aldicarb zero 6. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 NOT used. Analysis Date: 04 20 2006/ 14: 16: 43 Residue file dated: 04 19 2006/ 16: 54: 18/ 8 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. MC iterations = 1000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 10 Run Comment: Human RBC ===============================================================================

Summary calculations ( per capita):

95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD       U. S. Population: 0.000007 1.02 0.000044 6.83 0.000349 53.62 All infants: 0.000005 0.78 0.000042 6.40 0.000443 68.18 Children 1 2 yrs: 0.000017 2.62 0.000093 14.33 0.000773 118.97 Children 3 5 yrs: 0.000015 2.35 0.000077 11.81 0.000623 95.92 Children 6 12 yrs: 0.000010 1.51 0.000052 8.07 0.000443 68.14 Youth 13 19 yrs: 0.000006 0.98 0.000035 5.37 0.000304 46.81 Adults 20 49 yrs: 0.000005 0.78 0.000035 5.38 0.000290 44.62 Adults 50+ yrs: 0.000004 0.69 0.000051 7.80 0.000314 48.38 Females 13 49 yrs: 0.000005 0.71 0.000033 5.02 0.000274 42.20 Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEM Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

Page 109 of 203 Summary of Residue Distribution Files ( RDF) RDF File N residues N residues N LODs LOD N Zeros # Name w freq's w/ o freq's Value        1 29GFctfs. rdf 1 16 0 0 160 2 30GFctps. rdf 1 16 0 0 109 3 36LEctfs. rdf 1 16 0 0 1725 4 35LIctfs. rdf 1 16 0 0 709 5 18OGctfs. rdf 1 16 0 0 347 6 19OGctps. rdf 1 16 0 0 307 7 1Pecanft. rdf 5 10 0 0 253 8 49POmnfr. rdf 11 59 0 0 3040 9 50POmppr. rdf 3 10 0 0 1083 10 57SWmssp. rdf 11 59 0 0 272 11 58SWmcsp. rdf 3 10 0 0 582 Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEM Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

Analysis 3: Summary of Orange, Grapefruit, and Potato Residue Inputs for Aldicarb Acute Dietary Exposure [ Sensitivity Analysis  Assumes Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm in Citrus and Potatoes;

Assumes 2 LOD Residues in Citrus Monitoring Samples were True Zeroes]

Commodity 1 Food Form ( FF) 2 Classificat ion 3 F/ P 4 % CT ( A/ M) 5 Data Source 6 Acute RDF ( RDF #) 7 Uncooked PB F Cooked ( NFS) PB F 7/ 13 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 383Z ( 20)

Canned ( NFS) PB P Oranges Juice Frozen ( NFS) PB P 11/ 23 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 383Z ( 20)

Oranges  Juice Conc. All 7 food forms PB P 11/ 23 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 383Z ( 20)

Uncooked PB F Cooked ( NFS) PB F Boiled PB F 7/ 13 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 383Z ( 20)

Canned ( NFS) PB P Oranges  Peel Frozen ( NFS) PB P 11/ 23 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 383Z ( 20)

Uncooked NB F Cooked ( NFS) NB F 7/ 13 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 383Z ( 20)

Oranges  Peeled Fruit Canned ( NFS) PB P 11/ 23 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 383Z ( 20)

Uncooked PB F Boiled PB F 16/ 25 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 197Z ( 31)

Canned ( NFS) PB P Grapefruit

Juice Frozen PB P 17/ 33 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 146Z ( 32)

Grapefruit

Juice Conc. Frozen ( NFS) PB P 17/ 33 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 146Z ( 32)

Grapefruit

Peel Peel PB F 16/ 25 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 197Z ( 31)

Uncooked NB F Cooked ( NFS) NB F Boiled NB F 16/ 25 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 197Z ( 31)

Grapefruit

Peeled Fruit Canned ( NFS) PB P 17/ 33 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 146Z ( 32)

Cooked ( NFS) B P Baked B P Potatoes/

whitedry Boiled B P 17/ 24 PDP Special Survey ( composites) 0.001732 Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEM Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

Analysis 3: Summary of Orange, Grapefruit, and Potato Residue Inputs for Aldicarb Acute Dietary Exposure [ Sensitivity Analysis  Assumes Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm in Citrus and Potatoes;

Assumes 2 LOD Residues in Citrus Monitoring Samples were True Zeroes]

Commodity 1 Food Form ( FF) 2 Classificat ion 3 F/ P 4 % CT ( A/ M) 5 Data Source 6 Acute RDF ( RDF #) 7 Fried B P Canned ( NFS) B P Canned:

Boiled B P Frozen:

Cooked B P Cooked ( NFS) NB F Uncooked NB F Baked NB F Boiled NB F Fried NB F 4/ 5 PDP Special Survey ( single units) 160 Det.+ 3040Z ( 49)

Canned:

Cooked PB P Canned:

Boiled PB P Frozen:

Cooked PB P Frozen: Baked PB P Potatoes/

whitepeeled Frozen: Fried PB P 17/ 24 PDP Special Survey ( composites) 342 Det.+ 1083Z ( 50)

Baked NB F Potatoes/

whitepeel only Fried NB F 4/ 5 PDP Special Survey ( single units) 160 Det.+ 3040Z ( 49)

Potatoes/

whiteunspec Canned ( NFS) PB P 17/ 24 PDP Special Survey ( composites) 342 Det.+ 1083Z ( 50)

Uncooked NB F Cooked ( NFS) NB F Baked NB F Boiled NB F Potatoes/

whitewhole Fried NB F 4/ 5 PDP Special Survey ( single units) 160 Det.+ 3040Z ( 49) Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEM Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

Analysis 3: Summary of Orange, Grapefruit, and Potato Residue Inputs for Aldicarb Acute Dietary Exposure [ Sensitivity Analysis  Assumes Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm in Citrus and Potatoes;

Assumes 2 LOD Residues in Citrus Monitoring Samples were True Zeroes]

Commodity 1 Food Form ( FF) 2 Classificat ion 3 F/ P 4 % CT ( A/ M) 5 Data Source 6 Acute RDF ( RDF #) 7 Canned ( NFS) PB P 17/ 24 PDP Special Survey ( composites) 342 Det.+ 1083Z ( 50)

1 The reassessed tolerances are: 0.3 ppm in orange and grapefruit; and 0.2 ppm in potatoes.

2 Food forms shown in the table are taken directly from the DEEM software.

3 Refer to HED SOP99.6. NB = Not Blended; PB = Partially Blended; B = Blended.

4 F = Fresh commodity; P = Processed commodity.

5 BEAD estimated percent crop treated; M = estimated Maximum ( for acute exposure).

6 CTF = Carbamate Task Force.

7 RDF = Residue Distribution File. Det. = detect; LOD = residues at 2 LOD; Z = zeroes. Numbered RDFs are shown in detail in Attachment 4. For dried potatoes, a point estimate AR was used.

Analysis 3: Residue Inputs for Aldicarb Acute Dietary Exposure Analyses ( Except Orange, Grapefruit and Potato).

[ Sensitivity Analysis  Assumes Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm in Citrus and Potatoes;

Assumes 2 LOD Residues in Citrus Monitoring Samples were True Zeroes]

% CT 2 Commodity/ Reassessed Tol. 1 Ave. Max. Data Source 3 Commodity Classifica tion 4 Food Forms 5 Acute RDF 6 ( RDF #) Acute AR 7 Beans ( dry)/ 0.1 1 2 FT B Baked, boiled, fried, canned: cooked;

canned: boiled; cooked: NFS N/ A 0.000200 Coffee Beans/ 0.1 20 20 FT/ PS B Boiled; cooked: NFS N/ A 0.002 Cottonseed/ 0.

1 27 33 FT/ PS B Cottonseed meal N/ A 0.016995 B Cottonseed oil N/ A 0.000495 Lemon/ 0.3 1 3 CTF PB Peeled fruit: uncooked; cooked; canned, NFS;

Peel: uncooked, baked, boiled, canned, frozen;

Juice: canned, frozen Juice concentrate: frozen, cooked, baked, boiled,

canned 16 Det.+ 1,762Z ( 38) N/ A Limes/ 0.3 4 7 CTF PB Peeled fruit; Peel: baked, boiled; Juice: 16 Det.+ 746Z ( 37) N/ A Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEM Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

Analysis 3: Residue Inputs for Aldicarb Acute Dietary Exposure Analyses ( Except Orange, Grapefruit and Potato).

[ Sensitivity Analysis  Assumes Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm in Citrus and Potatoes;

Assumes 2 LOD Residues in Citrus Monitoring Samples were True Zeroes]

% CT 2 Commodity/ Reassessed Tol. 1 Ave. Max. Data Source 3 Commodity Classifica tion 4 Food Forms 5 Acute RDF 6 ( RDF #) Acute AR 7 uncooked, canned, frozen; Juice concentrate:

cooked, frozen Peanuts 30 47 FT B Peanuts, hulled; Peanuts  butter; N/ A 0.002585 Peanuts, oil N/ A 0.000705 Pecans/ 0.5 4 8 FT PB Unbaked, baked, boiled 22 detects + 253Z ( 1) N/ A Sorghum,

grain/ 0.2 0 ( 1) 0 ( 1) FT B Boiled N/ A 0.002 Soybeans/ 0.02 0 ( 1) 0 ( 1) FT B Soybean flour ( defatted, full fat); mature seeds,

dry; protein isolate; sprouted seeds) N/ A 0.0001 B soybean oil N/ A 0.00005 Sugarcane/ 0.0 2 0 ( 1) 0 ( 1) FT B Sugar cane, refined; sugar cane/ molasses N/ A N/ A Sugar beets/ 0.05 9 11 FT B Sugar beet, refined; sugar beet/ molasses N/ A N/ A Sweet potato/ 0.1 15 37 PDP potato ( single s) NB Cooked, baked, boiled, fried 160 Det.+ 272Z ( 57) N/ A PDP Composi tes PB Canned ( NFS, cooked, boiled) 342 Det.+ 582Z ( 58) N/ A 1 The relevant commodities are shown along with the reassessed tolerances from the 6/ 2/ 00 Residue Chemistry Chapter.

2 BEAD estimated percent crop treated; Max. = estimated Maximum ( for acute exposure).

3 FT = Field Trials; PS = Processing Study; CTF = Carbamate Task Force; PDP = USDA Pesticide Data Program ( monitoring data).

4 Refer to HED SOP99.6. NB = Not Blended; PB = Partially Blended; B = Blended.

5 Food forms shown in the table are taken directly from the DEEM software.

6 RDF = Residue Distribution File. Det. = detect; LOD = residues at 2 LOD; Z = zeroes. Numbered RDFs are shown in detail in Attachment 4.

7 For blended commodities, a point estimate was used for the acute analysis, with the % CT incorporated into the AR ( i. e.,

Adj. Factor 2 was set to 1). Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEM Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

Page 114 of 203 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID Acute analysis for ALDICARB Residue file name: C:\$ MyFiles\ Aldicarb Dietary\ dietary Apr 2006\ ER aldicarb zero citrus nondects zero 7. R98 Analysis Date 04 19 2006 Residue file dated: 04 19 2006/ 16: 42: 05/ 8 Reference dose ( aRfD) = 0.0005 mg/ kg bw/ day  RDL indices and parameters for Monte Carlo Analysis: Index Dist Parameter # 1 Param # 2 Param # 3 Comment # Code       1 6 31GFctfsn. rdf 2 6 32GFctpsn. rdf 3 6 38LEctsn. rdf 4 6 37LIctsn. rdf 5 6 20OGctsn. rdf 6 6 1Pecanft. rdf 7 6 49POmnfr. rdf 8 6 50POmppr. rdf 9 6 57SWmssp. rdf 10 6 58SWmcsp. rdf EPA Crop Food Name Def Res Adj. Factors RDL Code Grp ( ppm) # 1 # 2 Pntr        06030300 6C Bean, black, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030320 6C Bean, broad, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030340 6C Bean, cowpea, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030350 6C Bean, great northern, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030360 6C Bean, kidney, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030380 6C Bean, lima, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030390 6C Bean, mung, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030400 6C Bean, navy, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030410 6C Bean, pink, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030420 6C Bean, pinto, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030980 6C Chickpea, seed 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030981 6C Chickpea, seed babyfood 0.000200 0.050 1.000 06030990 6C Chickpea, flour 0.000200 0.050 1.000 95001150 O Coffee, roasted bean 0.002000 1.000 1.000 95001160 O Coffee, instant 0.002000 1.000 1.000 95001280 O Cottonseed, oil 0.000495 1.000 1.000 95001281 O Cottonseed, oil babyfood 0.000495 1.000 1.000 10001800 10 Grapefruit 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000747 1.000 1.000 1 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000747 1.000 1.000 1 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000922 1.000 1.000 2 10001810 10 Grapefruit, juice 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000747 0.014 1.000 1 120 Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000922 0.014 1.000 2 130 Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000747 0.014 1.000 1 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.000747 0.014 1.000 1 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000922 0.014 1.000 2 06031820 6C Guar, seed 0.000200 1.000 1.000 06031821 6C Guar, seed babyfood 0.000200 1.000 1.000 10001990 10 Lemon 0.000074 1.000 1.000 3 10002000 10 Lemon, juice 0.000074 0.460 1.000 3 10002001 10 Lemon, juice babyfood 0.000074 0.460 1.000 3 10002010 10 Lemon, peel 0.000074 1.000 1.000 3 06032030 6C Lentil, seed 0.000200 1.000 1.000 10002060 10 Lime 0.000200 1.000 1.000 4 10002070 10 Lime, juice 0.000200 0.460 1.000 4 10002071 10 Lime, juice babyfood 0.000200 0.460 1.000 4 10002400 10 Orange 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEM Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

Page 115 of 203 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000440 1.000 1.000 5 10002410 10 Orange, juice 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 0.580 1.000 5 120 Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000440 0.580 1.000 5 130 Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 0.580 1.000 5 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 0.580 1.000 5 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.000374 0.580 1.000 5 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.000374 0.580 1.000 5 221 Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.000440 0.580 1.000 5 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000440 0.580 1.000 5 10002411 10 Orange, juice babyfood 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000440 0.580 1.000 5 10002420 10 Orange, peel 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.000374 1.000 1.000 5 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.000440 1.000 1.000 5 06032560 6C Pea, dry 0.000200 1.000 1.000 06032561 6C Pea, dry babyfood 0.000200 1.000 1.000 06032580 6C Pea, pigeon, seed 0.000200 1.000 1.000 95002630 O Peanut 0.002585 1.000 1.000 95002640 O Peanut, butter 0.002585 1.890 1.000 95002650 O Peanut, oil 0.000705 1.000 1.000 14002690 14 Pecan 0.614000 1.000 1.000 6 01032960 1C Potato, chips 0.001732 1.000 1.000 01032970 1C Potato, dry ( granules/ flakes) 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.001732 0.300 1.000 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.001732 0.150 1.000 213 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried 0.001732 0.190 1.000 214 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried/ baked 0.001732 0.190 1.000 221 Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.001732 0.300 1.000 230 Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 232 Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.001732 0.150 1.000 01032971 1C Potato, dry ( granules/ flakes) b 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 01032980 1C Potato, flour 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 120 Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 130 Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.001732 0.300 1.000 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.001732 0.150 1.000 213 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried 0.001732 0.190 1.000 Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEM Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

Page 116 of 203 214 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried/ baked 0.001732 0.190 1.000 215 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled/ baked 0.001732 0.150 1.000 220 Cooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 221 Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.001732 0.300 1.000 222 Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 0.001732 0.150 1.000 223 Cooked; Frozen; Fried 0.001732 0.190 1.000 230 Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 231 Cooked; Dried; Baked 0.001732 0.300 1.000 232 Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.001732 0.150 1.000 233 Cooked; Dried; Fried 0.001732 0.190 1.000 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 242 Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.001732 0.150 1.000 250 Cooked; Cured etc; Cook Meth N/ S 0.001732 0.300 1.000 251 Cooked; Cured etc; Baked 0.001732 0.300 1.000 252 Cooked; Cured etc; Boiled 0.001732 0.150 1.000 253 Cooked; Cured etc; Fried 0.001732 0.190 1.000 01032981 1C Potato, flour babyfood 0.001732 1.000 1.000 01032990 1C Potato, tuber, w/ peel 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.010430 1.000 1.000 7 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.010430 1.000 1.000 7 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.010430 0.500 1.000 7 213 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried 0.010430 0.620 1.000 7 01032991 1C Potato, tuber, w/ peel babyfood 0.010430 1.000 1.000 7 01033000 1C Potato, tuber, w/ o peel 110 Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.010430 1.000 1.000 7 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.010430 1.000 1.000 7 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.010430 1.000 1.000 7 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.010430 1.000 1.000 7 213 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried 0.010430 1.000 1.000 7 221 Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 223 Cooked; Frozen; Fried 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 232 Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.010430 0.500 1.000 7 233 Cooked; Dried; Fried 0.010430 0.620 1.000 7 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.010430 0.500 1.000 8 242 Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.010430 0.500 1.000 8 252 Cooked; Cured etc; Boiled 0.010430 0.500 1.000 7 253 Cooked; Cured etc; Fried 0.010430 0.620 1.000 7 01033001 1C Potato, tuber, w/ o peel babyfood 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.010430 1.000 1.000 8 06003470 6 Soybean, seed 0.000100 1.000 1.000 06003480 6 Soybean, flour 0.000100 1.000 1.000 06003481 6 Soybean, flour babyfood 0.000100 1.000 1.000 06003490 6 Soybean, soy milk 0.000100 1.000 1.000 06003491 6 Soybean, soy milk babyfood or in 0.000100 1.000 1.000 06003500 6 Soybean, oil 0.000050 1.000 1.000 06003501 6 Soybean, oil babyfood 0.000050 1.000 1.000 01033660 1CD Sweet potato 210 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 0.004238 1.000 1.000 9 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.004238 1.000 1.000 9 212 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled 0.004238 0.500 1.000 9 213 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Fried 0.004238 0.620 1.000 9 215 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Boiled/ baked Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEM Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

Page 117 of 203 0.004238 0.500 1.000 9 242 Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.004238 0.500 1.000 10 245 Cooked; Canned; Boiled/ baked 0.004238 0.500 1.000 10 01033661 1CD Sweet potato babyfood 211 Cooked; Fresh or N/ S; Baked 0.004238 1.000 1.000 9 240 Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 0.004238 1.000 1.000 10 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID ACUTE Analysis for ALDICARB ( 1994 98 data) Residue file: ER aldicarb zero citrus nondects zero 7. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 NOT used. Analysis Date: 04 19 2006/ 18: 04: 37 Residue file dated: 04 19 2006/ 16: 42: 05/ 8 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. MC iterations = 1000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 10 Run Comment: RAT RBC ===============================================================================

Summary calculations ( per capita):

95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD       U. S. Population: 0.000006 1.23 0.000044 8.84 0.000348 69.61 All infants: 0.000003 0.65 0.000042 8.31 0.000444 88.87 Children 1 2 yrs: 0.000015 3.02 0.000091 18.27 0.000772 154.45 Children 3 5 yrs: 0.000014 2.89 0.000076 15.27 0.000623 124.61 Children 6 12 yrs: 0.000009 1.84 0.000051 10.27 0.000443 88.55 Youth 13 19 yrs: 0.000006 1.20 0.000035 6.99 0.000301 60.18 Adults 20 49 yrs: 0.000005 0.95 0.000035 6.99 0.000290 58.08 Adults 50+ yrs: 0.000004 0.83 0.000051 10.13 0.000314 62.85 Females 13 49 yrs: 0.000004 0.81 0.000033 6.51 0.000274 54.89 Attachment 6: Analysis 2  Residue Inputs and DEEM Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Assuming Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm.

Page 118 of 203 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID ACUTE Analysis for ALDICARB ( 1994 98 data) Residue file: ER aldicarb zero citrus nondects zero 7. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 NOT used. Analysis Date: 04 20 2006/ 11: 05: 29 Residue file dated: 04 19 2006/ 16: 59: 23/ 8 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. MC iterations = 1000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 10 Run Comment: RAT Brain ===============================================================================

Summary calculations ( per capita):

95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD       U. S. Population: 0.000006 0.82 0.000044 5.90 0.000348 46.41 All infants: 0.000003 0.44 0.000042 5.54 0.000444 59.24 Children 1 2 yrs: 0.000015 2.01 0.000091 12.18 0.000772 102.97 Children 3 5 yrs: 0.000014 1.93 0.000076 10.18 0.000623 83.08 Children 6 12 yrs: 0.000009 1.23 0.000051 6.85 0.000443 59.04 Youth 13 19 yrs: 0.000006 0.80 0.000035 4.66 0.000301 40.12 Adults 20 49 yrs: 0.000005 0.63 0.000035 4.66 0.000290 38.72 Adults 50+ yrs: 0.000004 0.55 0.000051 6.76 0.000314 41.90 Females 13 49 yrs: 0.000004 0.54 0.000033 4.34 0.000274 36.60 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID ACUTE Analysis for ALDICARB ( 1994 98 data) Residue file: ER aldicarb zero citrus nondects zero 7. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 NOT used. Analysis Date: 04 20 2006/ 14: 24: 14 Residue file dated: 04 19 2006/ 16: 51: 33/ 8 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. MC iterations = 1000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 10 Run Comment: Human RBC ===============================================================================

Summary calculations ( per capita):

95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD       U. S. Population: 0.000006 0.95 0.000044 6.80 0.000348 53.55 All infants: 0.000003 0.50 0.000042 6.39 0.000444 68.36 Children 1 2 yrs: 0.000015 2.32 0.000091 14.05 0.000772 118.81 Children 3 5 yrs: 0.000014 2.22 0.000076 11.74 0.000623 95.86 Children 6 12 yrs: 0.000009 1.41 0.000051 7.90 0.000443 68.12 Youth 13 19 yrs: 0.000006 0.92 0.000035 5.38 0.000301 46.29 Adults 20 49 yrs: 0.000005 0.73 0.000035 5.38 0.000290 44.68 Adults 50+ yrs: 0.000004 0.64 0.000051 7.80 0.000314 48.35 Females 13 49 yrs: 0.000004 0.62 0.000033 5.01 0.000274 42.23 Attachment7: Analysis 4  Residue Inputs and DEEM   Files for Acute Exposure Assessment, Including the Proposed Citrus Crop Group Tolerance.

Page 119 of 203 Analysis 4: Summary of Orange, Grapefruit, and Potato Residue Inputs for Aldicarb Acute Dietary Exposure Adds Proposed Citrus Crop Group Tolerance [ Assumes Aldicarb per se = 0 ppm in Citrus and Potatoes; Assumes 2 LOD Residues in Citrus Monitoring Samples were True Zeroes]

Commodity1 Food Form ( FF) 2 Classification3 F/ P4 % CT ( A/ M) 5 Data Source6 Acute RDF ( RDF #) 7 Uncooked PB F Cooked ( NFS) PB F 7/ 13 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 383Z ( 20)

Canned ( NFS) PB P Oranges Juice Frozen ( NFS) PB P 11/ 23 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 383Z ( 20)

Oranges  Juice Conc. All 7 food forms PB P 11/ 23 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 383Z ( 20)

Uncooked PB F Cooked ( NFS) PB F Boiled PB F 7/ 13 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 383Z ( 20)

Canned ( NFS) PB P Oranges  Peel Frozen ( NFS) PB P 11/ 23 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 383Z ( 20)

Uncooked NB F Cooked ( NFS) NB F 7/ 13 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 383Z ( 20) Oranges  Peeled Fruit Canned ( NFS) PB P 11/ 23 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 383Z ( 20)

Uncooked PB F Boiled PB F 16/ 25 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 197Z ( 31)

Canned ( NFS) PB P Grapefruit  Juice Frozen PB P 17/ 33 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 146Z ( 32)

Grapefruit  Juice Conc. Frozen ( NFS) PB P 17/ 33 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 146Z ( 32)

Grapefruit  Peel Peel PB F 16/ 25 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 197Z ( 31)

Uncooked NB F Cooked ( NFS) NB F Boiled NB F 16/ 25 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 197Z ( 31) Grapefruit  Peeled Fruit Canned ( NFS) PB P 17/ 33 CTF  single oranges 16 Det.+ 146Z ( 32)