combustion practices (GCP) designed to minimize THC from fuel
combustion. GCP include training all operators and supervisors to
operate and maintain the kiln and calciner, and the pollution control
systems in accordance with good engineering practices. The training
shall include methods for minimizing excess emissions.
    (g) No kiln and in-line kiln/raw mill may use as a raw material or
fuel any fly ash where the mercury content of the fly ash has been
increased through the use of activated carbon, or any other sorbent
unless the facility can demonstrate that the use of that fly ash will
not result in an increase in mercury emissions over baseline emissions
(i.e. emissions not using the fly ash). The facility has the burden of
proving there has been no emissions increase over baseline.
    (h) All kilns and in-line kilns/raw mills must remove (i.e. not
recycle to the kiln) from the kiln system sufficient cement kiln dust
to maintain the desired product quality.
    (i) New and reconstructed kilns and in-line kilns/raw mills must
not exceed the average hourly CKD recycle rate measured during mercury
performance testing. Any exceedance of this average hourly rate is
considered a violation of the standard.
0
5. Section 63.1346 is revised to read as follows:

Sec.  63.1346  Standards for new or reconstructed raw material dryers.

    (a) New or reconstructed raw material dryers located at facilities
that are major sources can not discharge to the atmosphere any gases
which:
    (1) Exhibit opacity greater than ten percent, or
    (2) Contain THC in excess of 20 ppmv, on a dry basis as propane
corrected to 7 percent oxygen if the source commenced construction
after December 2, 2005. As an alternative to the 20 ppmv standard, you
may demonstrate a 98 percent reduction in THC emissions from the exit
of the raw materials dryer to discharge to the atmosphere. If the
source is a greenfield dryer constructed on or prior to December 2,
2005, then the THC limit is 50 ppmv, on a dry basis corrected to 7
percent oxygen.
    (b) New or reconstructed raw materials dryers located at a facility
that is an area source cannot discharge to the atmosphere any gases
which contain THC in excess of 20 ppmv, on a dry basis as propane
corrected to 7 percent oxygen if the source commenced construction
after December 2, 2005. As an alternative to the 20 ppmv standard, you
may demonstrate a 98 percent reduction in THC emissions from the exit
of the raw materials dryer to discharge to the atmosphere. If the
source is a greenfield dryer constructed on or prior to December 2,
2005, then the THC limit is 50 ppmv, on a dry basis corrected to 7
percent oxygen.

0
6. Section 63.1349 is amended as follows:
0
a. By revising paragraph (b)(4);
0
b. By adding paragraph (b)(5);
0
c. By removing paragraph (f).

Sec.  63.1349  Performance Testing Requirements.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (4)(i) The owner or operator of an affected source subject to
limitations on emissions of THC shall demonstrate initial compliance
with the THC limit by operating a continuous emission monitor in
accordance with Performance Specification 8A of appendix B to part 60
of this chapter. The duration of the performance test shall be three
hours, and the average THC concentration (as calculated from the one-
minute averages) during the three-hour performance test shall be
calculated. The owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill shall
demonstrate initial compliance by conducting separate performance tests
while the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is under normal
operating conditions and while the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw
mill is not operating.
    (ii) The owner or operator of an affected source subject to
limitations on emissions of THC who elects to demonstrate compliance
with the alternative THC emission limit of 98 percent weight reduction
must demonstrate compliance by also operating a continuous emission
monitor in accordance with Performance Specification 8A of appendix B
to part 60 at the inlet to the THC control device of the kiln, inline
kiln raw mill, or raw materials dryer in the same manner as prescribed
in paragraph (i) above. Alternately, you may elect to demonstrate a 98
weight percent reduction in THC across the control device using the
performance test requirements in 40 CFR part 63, subpart SS.
    (5) The owner or operator of a kiln or in-line kiln/raw mill
subject to the 41 [mu]g/dscm mercury standard shall demonstrate
compliance using EPA Method 29 of 40 CFR part 60. ASTM D6784-02,
Standard Test Method for Elemental, Oxidized, Particle-Bound and Total
Mercury Gas Generated from Coal-Fired Stationary Sources (Ontario Hydro
Method), is an acceptable alternative to EPA Method 29 (portion for
mercury only). If the kiln has an in-line raw mill, you must
demonstrate compliance with both raw mill off and raw mill on. You must
record the hourly recycle rate of CKD during both test conditions and
calculate an average hourly rate for the three test runs for each test
condition.
* * * * *

0
7. Section 63.1350 is amended as follows:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (g), (h) and (n); and
0
b. Adding paragraphs (o) and (p).

Sec.  63.1350  Monitoring requirements.

* * * * *
    (g) The owner or operator of an affected source subject to an
emissions limitation on D/F, THC or mercury emissions that employs
carbon injection as an emission control technique shall comply with the
monitoring requirements of paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(6) and (g)(1)
through (g)(6) of this section to demonstrate continuous compliance
with the D/F, THC or mercury emissions standard.
    (1) Install, operate, calibrate and maintain a continuous monitor
to record the rate of activated carbon injection. The accuracy of the
rate measurement device must be 1 percent of the rate being
measured.
    (2) Verify the calibration of the device at least once every three
months.
    (3) The three-hour rolling average activated carbon injection rate
shall be calculated as the average of 180 successive one-minute average
activated carbon injection rates.
    (4) Periods of time when one-minute averages are not available
shall be ignored when calculating three-hour rolling averages. When
one-minute averages become available, the first one-minute average is
added to the previous 179 values to calculate the three-hour rolling
average.
    (5) When the operating status of the raw mill of the in-line kiln/
raw mill is changed from off to on, or from on to off, the calculation
of the three-hour

rolling average activated carbon injection rate must begin anew,
without considering previous recordings.
    (6) The owner or operator must install, operate, calibrate and
maintain a continuous monitor to record the activated carbon injection
system carrier gas parameter (either the carrier gas flow rate or the
carrier gas pressure drop) established during the mercury, THC or D/F
performance test in accordance with paragraphs (g)(6)(i) through
(g)(6)(iii) of this section.
    (i) The owner or operator shall install, calibrate, operate and
maintain a device to continuously monitor and record the parameter
value.
    (ii) The owner or operator must calculate and record three-hour
rolling averages of the parameter value.
    (iii) Periods of time when one-minute averages are not available
shall be ignored when calculating three-hour rolling averages. When
one-minute averages become available, the first one-minute average
shall be added to the previous 179 values to calculate the three-hour
rolling average.
    (h) The owner or operator of an affected source subject to a
limitation on THC emissions under this subpart shall comply with the
monitoring requirements of paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(3) of this
section to demonstrate continuous compliance with the THC emission
standard:
    (1) The owner or operator shall install, operate and maintain a THC
continuous emission monitoring system in accordance with Performance
Specification 8A, of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter and comply
with all of the requirements for continuous monitoring systems found in
the general provisions, subpart A of this part.
    (2) The owner or operator is not required to calculate hourly
rolling averages in accordance with section 4.9 of Performance
Specification 8A if they are only complying with the 50 ppmv THC
emissions limit.
    (3) For facilities complying with the 50 ppmv THC emissions limit,
any thirty-day block average THC concentration in any gas discharged
from a greenfield raw material dryer, the main exhaust of a greenfield
kiln, or the main exhaust of a greenfield in-line kiln/raw mill,
exceeding 50 ppmvd, reported as propane, corrected to seven percent
oxygen, is a violation of the standard.
    (4) For new facilities complying with the 20 ppmv THC emissions
limit, any hourly average THC concentration in any gas discharged from
a raw material dryer, the main exhaust of a greenfield kiln, or the
main exhaust of a kiln or in-line kiln/raw mill, exceeding 20 ppmvd,
reported as propane, corrected to seven percent oxygen, is a violation
of the standard.
* * * * *
    (n) Any kiln or kiln/in-line raw mill using a control device (other
then ACI) to comply with a mercury emissions limit or equipment
standard will monitor the control device parameters as specified in 40
CFR part 63 subpart SS.
    (o) For kilns and in-line kilns/raw mills complying with the
requirements in Section 63.1344(g), each owner or operator must obtain
a certification from the supplier for each shipment of fly ash received
to demonstrate that the fly ash was not derived from a source in which
the use of activated carbon, or any other sorbent, is used as a method
of mercury emissions control. The certification shall include the name
of the supplier and a signed statement from the supplier confirming
that the fly ash was not derived from a source in which the use of
activated carbon, or any other sorbent, is used as a method of emission
control.
    (p) If the facility opts to use a fly ash derived from a source in
which the use of activated carbon, or any other sorbent, is used as a
method of mercury emissions control and demonstrate that the use of
this fly ash does not increase mercury emissions, they must obtain
daily fly ash samples, composites monthly, and analyze the samples for
mercury.

0
8. Section 63.1351 is revised to read as follows:

Sec.  63.1351  Compliance dates.

    (a) Except as noted in paragraph (c) below, the compliance date for
an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the
provisions of this subpart is June 14, 2002.
    (b) Except as noted in paragraph (d) below, the compliance date for
an owner or operator of an affected source subject to the provisions of
this subpart that commences new construction or reconstruction after
March 24, 1998, is June 14, 1999, or upon startup of operations,
whichever is later.
    (c) The compliance date for an existing source to meet the
requirements of GCP for THC is December 20, 2007.
    (d) The compliance date for a new source which commenced
construction after December 2, 2005, and before December 20, 2006 to
meet the THC emission limit of 20 ppmv/98 percent reduction or the
mercury standard of 41 [mu]g/dscm or a site-specific standard based on
application of a wet scrubber will be December 21, 2009.

0
9. Section 63.1355 is amended by adding paragraphs (d), (e) and (f) to
read as follows:

Sec.  63.1355  Recordkeeping requirements.

* * * * *
    (d) You must keep annual records of the amount of CKD which is
removed from the kiln system and either disposed of as solid waste or
otherwise recycled for a beneficial use outside of the kiln system.
    (e) You must keep records of the amount of CKD recycled on an
hourly basis.
    (f) You must keep records of all fly ash supplier certifications as
required by Sec.  63.1350(o).

0
10. Section 63.1356 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.1356  Exemption from new source performance standards.

    (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this
section, any affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart
is exempt from any otherwise applicable new source performance standard
contained in subpart F or subpart OOO of part 60 of this chapter.
    (1) Kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills, as applicable, under 40 CFR
60.60(b), located at area sources are subject to PM and opacity limits
and associated reporting and recordkeeping, under 40 CFR part 60,
subpart F.
    (2) Greenfield raw material dryers, as applicable under 40 CFR
60.60(b), located at area sources, are subject to opacity limits and
associated reporting and recordkeeping under 40 CFR part 60, subpart F.
* * * * *
 [FR Doc. E6-21405 Filed 12-19-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 245 (Thursday, December 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 78722]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27921]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:  87 FR 77648,
December 19, 2022.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:  Monday, December
19, 2022 at 4:00 p.m.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING:  The Closed Meeting scheduled for Monday,
December 19, 2022 at 4:00 p.m., has been cancelled.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed,
please contact the Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: December 19, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-27921 Filed 12-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: June 9, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 111)]
[Notices]
[Page 33448-33449]
[DOCID:fr09jn06-34]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0061; FRL-8072-9]

Azinphos-methyl and Phosmet Proposed Decisions; Notice of
Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's proposed re-
evaluation decisions for the pesticides azinphos-methyl and phosmet,
the grower impact assessments, human health documents, environmental
fate and effects documents, and other related documents, and opens a
60-day public comment period. These proposed decisions implement the
2001 IREDs for these pesticides as well as the 2001 Memorandum of
Agreement between EPA and the phosmet technical registrants and the
2002 Memorandum of Agreement between EPA and the azinphos-methyl
technical registrants. EPA is proposing a schedule to phase out the
remaining uses of azinphos-methyl and is proposing to lengthen some
restricted-entry intervals (REIs) and seek additional biomonitoring
data for the nine time-limited uses of phosmet. EPA is also proposing
certain additional restrictions on the use of azinphos-methyl and
phosmet.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 8, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0061 for azinphos-methyl, or identified by
docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2002-0354 for phosmet, by
one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2005-0061 for azinphos-methyl and to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2002-
0354 for phosmet. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the docket without change and may be made available on-line
at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The Federal regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index.
Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov
, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. The hours of operation
of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket telephone number is (703)
305-5805.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Myers, Special Review and
Reregistration Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001;

telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farmworker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

     1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Background

A. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    EPA is making available the proposed decision documents and related
supporting documents for azinphos-methyl and phosmet.
    In the azinphos-methyl 2001 IRED, and subsequent Memorandum of
Agreement, the Agency concluded, based on evaluation of the risks and
benefits of the use of azinphos-methyl, that 35 uses should either be
immediately canceled or phased out over a four-year period. The
remaining ten time-limited azinphos-methyl uses (almonds, apples/
crabapples, highbush and lowbush blueberries, Brussels sprouts,
cherries, nursery stock, parsley, pears, pistachios, and walnuts) were
eligible for reregistration for a period of four years, after which EPA
would accept and evaluate applications for renewal of the
registrations.
    In the phosmet 2001 IRED EPA determined that three uses should be
canceled and that 33 uses were eligible for reregistration. EPA made a
time-limited determination for nine uses (apples, crabapples, peaches,
pears, nectarines, apricots, plums/prunes, grapes, and highbush
blueberries) and would reconsider those uses in 2006. The IRED provided
that this reconsideration would involve a determination whether the
restricted-entry intervals (REIs) for workers that were imposed as a
result of the IRED should be maintained indefinitely or whether longer
``default'' REIs, or other appropriate REIs, should be adopted.
    These IREDs were implemented through Memoranda of Agreements with
the phosmet and azinphos-methyl technical registrants in 2001 and 2002,
respectively.
    After consideration of the risks and benefits of these pesticides,
as provided in the IREDs, EPA is proposing that the remaining uses of
azinphos-methyl be phased out according to the following schedule:
almonds, pistachios, walnuts, Brussels sprouts, and nursery stock in
2007 and apples/crabapples, blueberries, cherries, pears, and parsley
in 2010. EPA is also proposing certain additional risk-mitigation
restrictions and activities, including larger buffers, reducing annual
application rates, and eliminating the few remaining aerial uses.
    EPA is proposing to increase the REIs for most of the nine time-
limited uses of phosmet and to require additional biomonitoring data
and additional use restrictions.
    The decision documents, including the Agency's supporting rationale
for these proposed decisions can be found in docket identification
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0061 for azinphos-methyl, and docket
identification number EPA-HQ-OPP-2002-0354 for phosmet at http://www.regulations.gov
.

    EPA is providing an opportunity, through this notice, for
interested parties to provide comments and input on the Agency's
proposed decisions for azinphos-methyl and phosmet.
    Comments should be limited to issues raised by the proposed
decisions and associated documents. All comments should be submitted
using the methods in ADDRESSES, and must be received by EPA on or
before the closing date. Comments will become part of the Agency Docket
for azinphos-methyl and phosmet.

B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

    EPA is reevaluating these uses of AZM and phosmet pursuant to
section 3c(5) of FIFRA, which provides, among other things, that the
EPA Adminstrator shall register a pesticide when its use will not cause
unreasonable adverse effects on the environment.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: June 5, 2006.
 Debra Edwards,
Director, Special Review and Reregistration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E6-8929 Filed 6-8-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 219 (Monday, November 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70466-70467]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29220]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4038-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]

Maryland; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Maryland (FEMA-4038-DR), dated October 5, 2011, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: November 3, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Maryland is hereby amended to include the following
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration
of October 5, 2011.

    Baltimore and Harford Counties for Public Assistance.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance

(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation
Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-29220 Filed 11-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: October 9, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 194)]
[Notices]
[Page 57314]
[DOCID:fr09oc07-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EL07-105-000; QF07-129-002]

Matanuska Electric Association, Inc., Tiqun Energy, Inc.; Notice
of Filing

September 28, 2007.
    Take notice that on August 31, 2007, as completed on September 21,
2007, Matanuska Electric Association, Inc. (Matanuska) filed a Petition
for Declaratory Order and Motion for Revocation seeking the revocation
of the qualifying facility (QF) status of a QF self-certified by Tiqun
Energy, Inc. (Tiqun). The QF, which has not been built, is the Pioneer
Energy Project (Pioneer Facility), which was self-certified by Tiqun in
Docket No. QF07-129-000. Matanuska claims that the Pioneer Facility
does not meet the criteria for QF status, and thus the Commission
should issue an order revoking its QF status. Matanuska also asks for
refund of the filing fee it paid on September 21, 2007, claiming that a
filing fee is not required for action on its petition/motion to revoke
the QF status of the Pioneer Facility.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on October 26, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-19784 Filed 10-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: April 22, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 78)]
[Notices]
[Page 21687-21688]
[DOCID:fr22ap08-98]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; Notice of Applications for
Modification of Special Permit

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: List of Applications for Modification of Special Permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations (49 CFR Part 107,
Subpart B), notice is hereby given that the Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety has received the application described herein. This
notice is abbreviated to expedite docketing and public notice. Because
the sections affected, modes of transportation, and the nature of
application have been shown in earlier Federal Register publications,
they are not repeated here. Request of modifications of special permits
(e.g. to provide for additional hazardous materials, packaging design
changes, additional mode of transportation, etc.) are described in
footnotes to the application number. Application numbers with the
suffix ``M'' demote a modification request. Their applications have
been separated from the new application for special permits to
facilitate processing.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 7, 2008.
    Address Comments to: Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration U.S. Department of Transportation,
Washington, DC 20590.
    Comments should refer to the application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of comments is desired, include
a self-addressed stamped postcard showing the special permit number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the applications are
available for inspection in the Records Center, East Building, PHH-30,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington DC or at http://dms.dot.gov.
    This notice of receipt of applications for modification of special
permit is published in accordance with Part 107 of the Federal
hazardous materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR
1.53(b)).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 14, 2008.
Delmer F. Billings,
Director, Office of Hazardous Materials, Special Permits and Approvals.

                                          Modification Special Permits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                         Regulation(s)       Nature of special
        Application No.             Docket No.          Applicant           affected          permit thereof
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8495-M........................  ..................  Kidde Aerospace,   49 CFR             To modify the special
                                                     Wilson, NC.        173.304(a)(1);     permit to
                                                                        178.47; 175.3.     authorizethe use of
                                                                                stainless steel in
                                                                                the manufacture of
                                                                                pressure vessels
12412-M.......................          RSPA006827  Maumee Valley      49 CFR             To modify the special
                                                     Bottlers, Inc.,    177.834(h);        permit to authorize
                                                     Napoleon, OH.      172.203(a);        the transportation in
                                                                        172.302(c).        commerce of IBCs
                                                                                equipped with
                                                                                pressure hoses
                                                                                without draining
                                                                                those hoses
13583-M.......................         RSPA0418507  Structural         49 CFR 178.35....  To modify the special
                                                     Composites                            permit to authorize
                                                     Industries,                           an alternative
                                                     Pomona, CA.                           pressure test

14562-M.......................      PI-11MSA080046  The Lite Cylinder  49 CFR             To modify the special
                                                     Company,           173.304a(a).       permit to authorize
                                                     Franklin, TN.                         an increase in the
                                                                                water capacity of
                                                                                Lite's cylinders and
                                                                                to authorize an
                                                                                alternative drop test
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [FR Doc. E8-8439 Filed 4-21-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4909-60-M