[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 231 (Friday, November 30, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61551-61552]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25900]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0413; FRL-9985-75-Region 9]

Revisions to California State Implementation Plan; South Coast
Air Quality Management District; Stationary Source Permits

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing action
on a revision to the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD or District) portion of the California State Implementation
Plan (SIP). We are finalizing a conditional approval of one rule
governing issuance of permits for stationary sources, including review
and permitting of major sources and major modifications under part D of
title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA). Specifically, the revision pertains
to SCAQMD Rule 1325--Federal PM2.5 New Source Review
Program.

DATES: This rule will be effective on December 31, 2018.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0413. All documents in the docket are
listed on the http://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available through http://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Yannayon, EPA Region 9, (415)
972-3534, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ``we,''
``us,'' and ``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On August 8, 2018 (83 FR 39012), the EPA proposed to conditionally
approve the following rule that was submitted for incorporation into
the SCAQMD portion of the California SIP.

                         Table 1--Submitted Rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Rule No.            Rule title            Amended        Submitted
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1325...........  Federal PM2.5 New               11/4/16          5/8/17
                  Source Review Program.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We proposed a conditional approval of this rule because we
determined that, separate from the deficiencies listed in Section II.B
of our proposed rulemaking action, the rule met the statutory
requirements for SIP revisions as specified in section 110(l) of the
CAA, as well as the substantive statutory and regulatory requirements
for a nonattainment New Source Review (NSR) permit program as contained
in CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C) and 173(a) through (c), and 40 CFR 51.165
that pertain to a PM2.5 nonattainment area classified as
Serious. Moreover, we concluded that if the State submits the changes
it committed to submit in its July 16, 2018 commitment letter, the
identified deficiencies will be cured.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received two comments on the proposed rule.
These comments raised issues that are outside the scope of our proposed
approval of Rule 1325, including air pollution monitoring in China and
India, climate change, and wind and solar power costs and regulations.
None of those comments are germane to our evaluation of Rule 1325.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted that change our assessment that
submitted Rule 1325 satisfies the applicable CAA requirements.
Therefore, under CAA sections 110(k)(4) and 301(a), and for the reasons
set forth in our August 8, 2018 proposed rule, we are finalizing the
conditional approval of Rule 1325. This action incorporates Rule 1325
into the federally enforceable SIP and will be codified through
revisions to 40 CFR 52.220 (Identification of plan) and 40 CFR 52.248
(Identification of plan--conditional approval).
    If the State meets its commitment to submit the required changes,
the revisions to Rule 1325 will remain a part of the SIP until EPA
takes final action approving or disapproving the new SIP revisions.
However, if the State fails to submit these revisions within the
required timeframe, the conditional approval will automatically become
a disapproval, and EPA will issue a finding of disapproval. EPA is not
required to propose the finding of disapproval.
    In addition, because we are finalizing our proposed action, we are
removing the existing Rule 1325 from the SCAQMD portion of the
California SIP.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
SCAQMD rule listed in Table 1 of this preamble. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these materials available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the EPA Region IX Office
(please contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, New Source Review, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: October 11, 2018.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(458)(i)(A)(2) and
(c)(509) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.220   Identification of plan--in part.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (458) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (2) Previously approved on May 1, 2015 in paragraph
(c)(458)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
paragraph (c)(509)(i)(A)(1), Rule 1325.
* * * * *
    (509) New and amended regulations for the following APCDs were
submitted on May 8, 2017 by the Governor's designee.
    (i) Incorporation by reference. (A) South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
    (1) Rule 1325, ``Federal PM2.5 New Source Review
Program'' amended on November 4, 2016.
    (2) [Reserved]
    (B) [Reserved]
    (ii) [Reserved]
* * * * *

0
3. Section 52.248 is amended by adding paragraph (f) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.248   Identification of plan--conditional approval.

* * * * *
    (f) The EPA is conditionally approving a California State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted on May 8, 2017, updating
Rule 1325--Federal PM2.5 New Source Review Program, for the
South Coast Air Quality Management District. The conditional approval
is based on a commitment from the State to submit a SIP revision that
will correct the identified deficiencies. If the State fails to meet
its commitment by December 30, 2019, the conditional approval is
treated as a disapproval.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-25900 Filed 11-29-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: November 9, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 215)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 57559-57561]
[DOCID:fr09no09-1]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0310; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-012-AD;
Amendment 39-16073; AD 2009-23-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional
Jet Series 100 & 440) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    During the Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP) of returned Inboard
Flap Actuators * * * an excessive wear condition was identified
regarding endplay between the flap actuator and ball screw.
Excessive wear of the screw and ball nut could potentially lead to a
flap system jam. * * *
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is a flap system jam, which could result in a
skewed flap condition with consequent reduced controllability of the
airplane. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective December 14, 2009.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of December 14,
2009.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on April 6, 2009 (74 FR
15399). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    During the Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP) of returned Inboard
Flap Actuators [with Bombardier] Part Number (PN) 601R93101-19 [and
Eaton PN 852D100-19], an excessive wear condition was identified
regarding endplay between the flap actuator and ball screw.
Excessive wear of the screw and ball nut could potentially lead to a
flap system jam. A Temporary Revision (TR) has been made to the
Bombardier CL-600-2B19 Maintenance Requirements Manual (MRM),
Appendix A, ``Certification Maintenance Requirements'' (CMR) to
ensure that unacceptable wear on the nut and ball screw is detected
and corrected.
    Revision 1 of this directive introduces a new phase-in schedule
for performing a new CMR task C27-50-300-01.

The unsafe condition is a flap system jam, which could result in a
skewed flap condition with consequent reduced controllability of the
airplane. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.

Support for the NPRM

    The Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA), supports the
NPRM. Given the potential consequences of a flap system jam while in
flight, ALPA agrees that all reasonable steps should be taken to avoid
such an occurrence, and encourages the FAA to implement the proposal as
soon as possible.

Request To Confirm an Applicable Part Number

    Robert E. Briggs, a private citizen, requests that we confirm that
Eaton PN 852D100-19, listed in the Bombardier CL-600-2B19 CMR, is also
subject to this AD, as is the Bombardier PN 601R93101-19 specified in
the NPRM.
    We agree. We have confirmed that both Eaton PN 852D100-19 and
Bombardier PN 601R93101-19, the inboard flap actuators, are subject to
the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. Both part numbers are
specified in the service information identified in the NPRM and this
final rule. We have revised the Discussion section and paragraph (e) of
this AD to clarify that both the Bombardier and Eaton parts are
affected.

Request To Revise Compliance Time

    Mr. Briggs states that the NPRM proposed an initial compliance time
for the new CMR task of 500 flight hours after the effective date of
the AD, while the CMR specifies an initial compliance time of 2,000
flight cycles from November 7, 2007. Mr. Briggs asks why there is a
difference with flight hours and flight cycles, and asserts that it
would be easier to track and less confusing if they were the same.
    From this comment, we infer that Mr. Briggs is requesting that we
revise the proposed compliance time specified in paragraph (f) of the
NPRM. We do not agree. Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), in its
Airworthiness Directive (AD) CF-2008-33R1, dated January 9, 2009
(referenced in the NPRM as the MCAI), gave an additional 500 flight
hours (not cycles) as a grace period only to avoid grounding airplanes
that have already reached the initial compliance time, but that have
not yet done the initial functional check introduced in Bombardier
Temporary Revision 2A-41, dated November 7, 2007. Operators that have
done the initial functional check before the effective date of the AD
are required to comply with the CMR schedule. We concur with TCCA's
decision to include the additional time for those airplanes to comply
with this AD; therefore, we have not changed the AD in this regard.

Request To Withdraw the NPRM

    Air Wisconsin Airlines Corporation (Air Wisconsin) states that an
AD is redundant in this case because the applicable CMR is already
mandatory, and an AD puts the two documents in conflict.
    From this comment, we infer that Air Wisconsin is requesting that
we withdraw the NPRM. We do not agree. The FAA issues an AD on a
specific product when we find that an unsafe condition exists in the
product and the condition is likely to exist or develop in other
products of the same type design. In this case, we have identified an
unsafe condition of excessive wear of the ball screw and ball nut of
certain inboard flap actuators. This AD introduces a new phase-in
schedule for performing a new CMR task (inspecting the ball screw and
ball nut) to correct that unsafe condition. If a conflict arises
between an AD and the specified service information, the AD must be
followed. We have not changed the AD in this regard.

Explanation of Change to the Unsafe Condition

    We have revised the unsafe condition statement throughout this AD
to expand on the possible end-level effect of a flap system jam.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a Note within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 668 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 3 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $80 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $160,320, or $240 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2009-23-02 Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly Canadair): Amendment 39-16073.
Docket No. FAA-2009-0310; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-012-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective December
14, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional
Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in
any category.

    Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance according
to paragraph (g)(1) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the airplane.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
Controls.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    During the Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP) of returned Inboard
Flap Actuators [with Bombardier] Part Number (PN) 601R93101-19 [and
Eaton PN 852D100-19], an excessive wear condition was identified
regarding endplay between the flap actuator and ball screw.
Excessive wear of the screw

and ball nut could potentially lead to a flap system jam. A
Temporary Revision (TR) has been made to the Bombardier CL-600-2B19
Maintenance Requirements Manual (MRM), Appendix A, ``Certification
Maintenance Requirements'' (CMR) to ensure that unacceptable wear on
the nut and ball screw is detected and corrected.
    Revision 1 of this directive introduces a new phase-in schedule
for performing a new CMR task C27-50-300-01.

The unsafe condition is a flap system jam, which could result in a
skewed flap condition with consequent reduced controllability of the
airplane.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD, revise the Airworthiness Requirements Section of the
Bombardier CL-600-2B19 MRM to include the information in Bombardier
TR 2A-41, dated November 7, 2007, to Appendix A of the Airworthiness
Requirements, Part 2, of the Bombardier CL-600-2B19 MRM. The initial
compliance with the new CMR task must be done within 500 flight
hours after the effective date of this AD.

    Note 2: The actions required by paragraph (f) of this AD may be
done by inserting a copy of Bombardier TR 2A-41, dated November 7,
2007, to Appendix A of the Airworthiness Requirements, Part 2, of
the Bombardier CL-600-2B19 MRM. When this TR has been included in
general revisions of the MRM, the TR may be removed from the MRM,
provided the relevant information in the general revision is
identical to that in Bombardier TR 2A-41, dated November 7, 2007.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 3: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New
York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any
approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics
inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2008-33R1,
dated January 9, 2009; and Bombardier TR 2A-41, dated November 7,
2007, to Appendix A of the Airworthiness Requirements, Part 2, of
the Bombardier CL-600-2B19 MRM; for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use Bombardier Temporary Revision 2A-41, dated
November 7, 2007, to Appendix A of the Airworthiness Requirements,
Part 2, of the Bombardier CL-600-2B19 Maintenance Requirements
Manual, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://
www.bombardier.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 19, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-26296 Filed 11-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


                    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

            DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

                    OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

                             WASHINGTON, DC

Docket:  OST-2002-12496							Served: June 13, 2002

NOTICE

U.S.-Vietnam Third-Country Code-Share Opportunity

By this notice we invite all U.S. certificated air carriers interested
in using seven weekly frequencies and a third-country code-share
opportunity in the U.S.-Vietnam market to file applications as specified
below in the captioned docket.

The Memorandum of Discussions (MOD) signed in March 2000 by the United
States and Vietnam, states the intent of the respective authorities to
allow, inter alia, third-country code-sharing of passenger air
transportation in the U.S.-Vietnam market (via intermediate points) on
the basis of comity and reciprocity.  Specifically, the MOD provides
that up to three cooperative marketing arrangements “between any
number of U.S. airlines and any number of third-country airlines” may
be authorized.  The code-share arrangements may serve between any points
in the United States, on the one hand, and up to three Vietnamese points
selected by the United States (via any intermediate points), on the
other hand.  The MOD provides for a total of 21 weekly round-trip
frequencies for use by U.S. carriers to operate these services.

By Order 2001-8-21, served August 23, 2001, the Department awarded Delta
Air Lines, Inc., Northwest Airlines, Inc. and United Air Lines, Inc.
seven weekly frequencies each for U.S.-Vietnam third-country
code-sharing services and granted the necessary regulatory authority for
the carriers to conduct their respective code-share services.  Each
allocation of frequencies was subject to the condition that the
frequencies would revert automatically to the Department if unused for a
period of 90 days and the dormancy period began on the date of service
of the order (i.e., August 23, 2001).  Subsequently, by Order
2001-11-15, the carriers were granted dormancy waivers due to the
circumstances of September 11, 2001, but that order noted that any
dormant limited-entry route authorities not resumed by April 1, 2002,
would revert automatically to the Department.  Northwest Airlines did
not begin services to Vietnam by that date; thus, its frequencies have
reverted to the Department, and the designation as well as the
frequencies formerly held by Northwest are at issue before the
Department.

On May 9, 2002, American Airlines submitted an application for six
frequencies for third country services to Vietnam via Tokyo, Japan, with
Japan Airlines Company, Ltd.  Subsequently, additional applications for
some or all of the available frequencies were filed in Docket 2000-7194,
the Docket for the previous allocation of frequencies in 2001, by Delta
Air Lines (with code-share partner Korean Airlines seeking six
frequencies), Northwest Airlines, Inc. (with code-share partner Malaysia
Airlines for reallocation of seven frequencies), and United Air Lines,
Inc. (with code-share partners All Nippon Airways Co. Ltd, and Thai
Airways International Public Co. Ltd. seeking seven frequencies).
Inasmuch as there are more requests for frequencies than there are
frequencies available, we will consolidate these requests (and related
pleadings thereto) into a new docket (noted in the heading of this
notice) to consider these requests as well as any other applications
that may be filed in response to this notice.  We will allow carriers
with the pending requests to supplement their applications to provide
the information we are requiring for consideration.

We request by this notice that all U.S. air carriers interested in
making use of the code-share opportunity and related frequencies
described above file applications (or supplemented applications) with
the Department in the newly established docket no later than June 27,
2002.  Answers to such applications should be filed no later than July
8, 2002.  Replies to answers should be filed no later than July 15,
2002.

Carriers without the requisite operating authority should file
exemption/designation applications and requests for statements of
authorization to serve the affected markets in conjunction with the
foreign code-share carrier(s) involved.  Carriers with the requisite
underlying authority and statements of authorization need only file
requests for the available code-share opportunity.  All applications
should include, at a minimum, the following information:  (a) the
proposed startup date; (b) the markets to be served, including the
number and identity of U.S. cities that would receive nonstop-to-nonstop
connections in the U.S.-Vietnan market, and the total elapsed travel
time (including layover time) for each flight between each initial point
of origin and each final destination in both directions (i.e. provide a
total elapsed round-trip travel time for each city pair and break-out
subtotals for the elapsed times on the U.S. to Vietnam flights and the
Vietnam to U.S. flights); (c) the number of frequencies to be provided
between the U.S. and Vietnam and the duration of service if not provided
on a year-round basis for each leg of the flights;  (d) type of
aircraft, including the number of seats, to be used between the U.S. and
the intermediate point(s) and between the intermediate point(s) and
Vietnam; (e) the foreign code-share carrier involved, the country and
the specific intermediate point(s) over which the services will be
provided, and which carrier would be operating each leg of the flights;
(f) existing authority held to conduct the operations, if applicable;
and (g) assurance that the U.S. air carrier applicant has provided or
will provide the Department with the Compliance Statement referred to in
Section IV of the DOT Code-Share Safety Program Guidelines (issued
February 29, 2000) concerning a safety audit of the foreign air
carrier(s) involved.  In addition, carriers must provide as a part of
their applications, copies of the relevant cooperative service
arrangements, if not already on file with the Department.  Applicants
are free to submit any additional information that they believe will
help us in making our decision.

Except for the procedural dates, exemption applications should conform
to Part 302, Subpart C of our regulations (14 CFR Part 302).  All
applications (for operating authority and/or designation) should be
filed with the Department of Transportation in the established docket,
Dockets and Media Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW,
Washington, DC 20590.

We intend to allocate the available opportunities at issue based on the
applications and responsive pleadings filed in response to this notice.
We intend to make our decision using written, show-cause procedures in
accordance with Part 302 of our regulations (14 CFR Part 302).

We will authorize service of documents by facsimile and by electronic
mail.  Carriers that are interested in such service, however, should
state if they want service by email and should provide interested
parties with their fax number and/or email address.

We will serve this notice on all U.S. certificated air carriers
operating large aircraft.

By:

							PAUL L. GRETCH

							         Director

						     Office of International Aviation

(SEAL)

Dated:  June 13, 2002

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at

http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

 The MOD does not contemplate direct service between the United States
and Vietnam.

 The United States has selected the Vietnamese cities of Hanoi, Ho Chi
Minh City, and DaNang.  The three points selected by the United States
may be changed subject to a 30-day advance notice requirement.

 Delta’s code-share partner was Air France; Nortwest’s partners were
Malaysia Airlines and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines; and United’s partners
were All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd., Thai Airways International, and
Lufthansa German Airlines.

 See Docket OST-2002-12301.

 See Docket OST-2000-7194.

The original submission is to be unbound and without tabs on 8 ½" x 11"
white paper using dark ink (not green) to facilitate use of the
Department's docket imaging system.  In the alternative, filers are
encouraged to use the electronic submission capability available through
the Dockets/DMS Internet site (  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov"
http://dms.dot.gov ) by following the instructions at the web site).

 PAGE

 PAGE   2


CA NDZ: Vessel Sewage Data Analysis for LOGVs
September 20, 2011

Data QC for Large Oceangoing Vessels (LOGVs):
EPA used US Coast Guard (USCG) data on LOGV vessel port calls, and Chamber of Shipping of America (CSA) data on LOGV size and sewage treatment to determine the volume of sewage annually generated in State marine waters that might be held, and the volume  that might be discharged into State marine waters, if EPA promulgated a rule that prohibited LOGVs with holding tanks from discharging sewage to State marine waters except for sewage generated within State waters that exceeds the LOGVs  maximum holding capacity.  EPA also used this information to calculate the volumes of sewage that might be held and discharged under the rule proposed in the NPRM.
1. USCG vessel call data from 2010 was used to determine length of port calls for LOGVs entering California waters.  Time entries were converted to hours.  682 passenger vessels were not included. Nine entries were not included because they were for 2011, and 15 entries were not included because they did not include departure dates. A total of 8,751 LOGVs  >300 GRT were assessed.
2. CSA data from 2010, which includes information on the size, crew, sewage holding tank capacity, sewage generation rate and MSDs for  LOGVs operating in US waters, was used to determine median daily sewage generation and median holding capacity for the 587 surveyed vessels >300 GRT.  The median rate of sewage generation for the surveyed LOGVs is 397 gallons per day.  Volume generated per day was reported by each vessel in the CSA survey.  This translates to crew member sewage generation rate of 16 gallons per day (almost twice the rate estimated for the NPRM based on large passenger ship data).
Vessels were categorized by days of holding tank capacity in the following increments:  0, 0-1, 1.1-2, 2.1-3, 3.1-4, 4.1-5, and greater than 5.16 days (the median length of the longest port call category from the USCG data (4.1-731 days)).  The final category,  median holding capacity >5.16 days, was used as the cutoff since most vessels with this amount of holding capacity are unlikely to discharge while in port.  The median tank capacity for each holding capacity strata was identified.

Table 1. Median Holding Capacity
CSA LOGV Data

          Holding Capacity (days)
Vessel Count
Percent
Median (days)
0
                                                                            224
                                                                            38%
                                                                              0
0.1-1
                                                                             33
                                                                             6%
                                                                            0.8
1.1-2
                                                                             42
                                                                             7%
                                                                            1.5
2.1-3
                                                                             16
                                                                             3%
                                                                            2.5
3.1-4
                                                                             26
                                                                             4%
                                                                            3.6
4.1-5
                                                                             43
                                                                             7%
                                                                            4.7
>5.16
                                                                            200
                                                                            34%
                                                                           12.2

3. Port calls were stratified into five categories depending on length of stay in the following increments:  0-1, 1.1-2, 2.1-3, 3.1-4, and 4.1-73 days. The median time in port was determined for each of the five categories. The amount of sewage generated for each port call category (per visit) was calculated by multiplying the median length of port stay by the median vessel sewage generation rate  of 397 gallons/day obtained from the CSA data.  The total annual volume of sewage generated was determined for each port call category by multiplying the sewage generated in each category by the respective number of port call reports for that category.  The sum of the five port call categories was approximately 6.0 million gallons of sewage generated for 2010.
According to the CSA data, 38% of vessels have zero holding capacity. The number of reports for each port call length category was multiplied by 38% to estimate the length of port calls by vessels with zero holding capacity and the product was multiplied by the estimated sewage generation for each length of port call to estimate how much sewage might be discharged by vessels with zero holding capacity over a year (result ~ 2.3M gallons/year). The percentage of vessels in each of the holding capacity categories was calculated. For each category, the volume of sewage that could be held in holding tanks, and the volume of sewage that exceeded holding tank capacity was calculated. As expected, increasing holding capacity resulted in reduced discharge and increased the volumes of sewage that could be held. For each category, the volume of sewage that would be discharged because it exceeded vessel holding capacity was determined by subtracting the holding capacity days from the length of port call days and multiplying the difference by the median generation rate of 397 gallons/day, then multiplying the product by the percentage of port calls with a specific holding capacity. For example, if a vessel is in port for 2.5 days and only has 0.8 day holding capacity, the vessel is expected to discharge for 1.7 days (2.5 - 0.8 = 1.7). Multiplying 1.7 days by the 397 gallon/day median discharge rate yields the amount of sewage discharged over the course of the 2.5 day port call.  Since 6% of LGOVs are in the  0.8 day median holding capacity category, 6%(0.06) is multiplied by the number of 2.5 day port calls (1,468) to determine the number of port calls where a discharge of 1.7 days will occur. The calculation for the category of LOGVs with 2.5 day port calls and 0.8 day median holding capacity is (2.5 - 0.8 days) X 397 gallons/day = 674.9 gallons/call X (6% X 1,468 port calls = 88) = 59,445 gallons discharged /year. This process was repeated for each port call length and each holding capacity category as shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Vessel Sewage Generation Analysis
                               Port Call Values
   LOGV Discharge and Holding Volumes by Holding Capacity Category (gallons)

Port Call Days
2010 Vessel Call Reports
Percent of Total
2010 Port Call Days Median
Gallons generated based on port call days X *397 g (median)
Total annual volume generated by length of port call category
Volume DISCHARGED for vessels with zero holding capacity (38% of vessels)
Volume DISCHARGED for vessels with 0.8  day median holding capacity (6% of vessels)
Volume HELD for vessels with 0.8  day median holding capacity (6% of vessels)
Volume DISCHARGED for vessels with 1.5  day median holding capacity (7% of vessels)
Volume HELD for vessels with 1.5  day median holding capacity (7% of vessels)
Volume DISCHARGED for vessels with 2.5  day median holding capacity (3% of vessels)
Volume HELD for vessels with 2.5  day median holding capacity (3% of vessels)
Volume DISCHARGED for vessels with 3.6  day median holding capacity (4% of vessels)
Volume HELD for vessels with 3.6  day median holding capacity (4% of vessels)
Volume DISCHARGED for vessels with 4.7  day median holding capacity (7% of vessels)
Volume HELD for vessels with 4.7  day median holding capacity (7% of vessels)
Volume DISCHARGED for vessels with >5.16 day  holding capacity (34% of vessels)
Volume HELD for vessels with 5.16 day holding capacity (34% of vessels)
0 - 1
                                                                          3,559
                                                                            42%
                                                                           0.63
                                                                            248
                                                                        883,077
                                                                        335,569
                                                                              0
                                                                         53,408
                                                                              0
                                                                         62,310
                                                                              0
                                                                         26,704
                                                                              0
                                                                         35,606
                                                                              0
                                                                         62,310
                                                                              0
                                                                        302,648
1.1 - 2
                                                                          2,045
                                                                            24%
                                                                           1.46
                                                                            579
                                                                      1,183,699
                                                                        449,806
                                                                         32,052
                                                                         38,970
                                                                              0
                                                                         82,973
                                                                              0
                                                                         35,560
                                                                              0
                                                                         47,413
                                                                              0
                                                                         82,973
                                                                              0
                                                                        403,010
2.1 - 3
                                                                          1,468
                                                                            17%
                                                                           2.50
                                                                            993
                                                                      1,456,990
                                                                        553,656
                                                                         59,445
                                                                         27,974
                                                                         40,796
                                                                         61,194
                                                                              0
                                                                         43,710
                                                                              0
                                                                         58,280
                                                                              0
                                                                        101,989
                                                                              0
                                                                        495,377
3.1 - 4
                                                                            843
                                                                            10%
                                                                           3.46
                                                                          1,373
                                                                      1,157,292
                                                                        439,771
                                                                         53,373
                                                                         16,064
                                                                         45,870
                                                                         35,140
                                                                          9,618
                                                                         25,100
                                                                              0
                                                                         46,318
                                                                              0
                                                                         81,057
                                                                              0
                                                                        393,707
4.1 - 731
                                                                            656
                                                                             8%
                                                                           5.16
                                                                          2,049
                                                                      1,343,829
                                                                        510,655
                                                                         68,129
                                                                         12,501
                                                                         66,723
                                                                         27,345
                                                                         20,782
                                                                         19,532
                                                                         16,251
                                                                         37,502
                                                                          8,386
                                                                         85,682
                                                                              0
                                                                        456,902

                                                                           8571

                                                                      6,024,887
                                                                      2,289,457
                                                                        213,000
                                                                        148,917
                                                                        153,388
                                                                        268,962
                                                                         30,401
                                                                        150,606
                                                                         16,251
                                                                        225,119
                                                                          8,386
                                                                        414,011
                                                                              0
                                                                      2,051,643

                                     6.0M
Sum Discharged
Sum Held

                                                                      2,710,883
                                                                      3,259,259

2.7M
3.3M

4. Data Analysis for the Proposed Rule (9/2/10), prohibiting discharges to State marine waters from all LOGVs >300 GRT with 2 days or more holding capacity:  Vessel holding tank and port call categories are stratified the same as above.  Based on CSA data, 49% of vessels had 2 days or more holding capacity and 51% had less than 2 days holding capacity. Using this data, including the higher sewage generation rate, annual 2010 vessel sewage generation for each port call category was multiplied by 49% and 51%. The result indicates that the 49% of vessels with 2 days or more holding capacity would be prohibited from discharging approximately 2.9M gallons per year and the 51% of vessels with less than 2 days holding capacity, not subject to the proposed rule, would not be prohibited from discharging approximately 3.1M gallons per year.
Table 3. Vessel Sewage Generation Method Used for Proposed Rule
                               Port Call Values
               Large Oceangoing Vessel Sewage Volumes (gallons)
Port Call Days
2010 Vessel Call Reports
Percent of Total
2010 Port Call Days Median
Gallons generated based on port call days X *397 g (median)
Total annual volume generated by length of port call category
Sewage generated by vessels with less than 2-days  holding capacity
Sewage generated by vessels with 2-days or more holding capacity
0 - 1
                                                                          3,559
                                                                            42%
                                                                           0.63
                                                                            248
                                                                        883,077
                                                                        450,369
                                                                        432,708
1.1 - 2
                                                                          2,045
                                                                            24%
                                                                           1.46
                                                                            579
                                                                      1,183,699
                                                                        603,687
                                                                        580,013
2.1 - 3
                                                                          1,468
                                                                            17%
                                                                           2.50
                                                                            993
                                                                      1,456,990
                                                                        743,065
                                                                        713,925
3.1 - 4
                                                                            843
                                                                            10%
                                                                           3.46
                                                                          1,373
                                                                      1,157,292
                                                                        590,219
                                                                        567,073
4.1 - 731
                                                                            656
                                                                             8%
                                                                           5.16
                                                                          2,049
                                                                      1,343,829
                                                                        685,353
                                                                        658,476

                                                                      6,024,887
                                                                      3,072,693
                                                                      2,952,195

                                     6.0M
                                     3.1M
                                     2.9M


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 158 (Thursday, August 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 39122]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17356]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-1840-000]

Canton Mountain Wind, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Canton Mountain Wind, LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is August 30, 2017.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 10, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-17356 Filed 8-16-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 46 (Friday, March 8, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8415-8416]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04155]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0974; Airspace Docket No. 18-ACE-4]
RIN 2120-AA66

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Auburn, NE

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at Farington Field Airport, Auburn, NE.
Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new standard instrument
approach procedures developed at Farington Field Airport, for the
safety and management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at
this airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, April 25, 2019. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under Title 1
Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11C at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Shelby, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface at Farington Field Airport, Auburn, NE, to support IFR
operations at the airport.

History

    On December 17, 2018, the FAA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register (83 FR 64490) for Docket No. FAA-
2018-0974, to establish Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Farington Field Airport, Auburn, NE. Interested
parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. One comment was
received. The comment was not germane to the proposed rule change.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15,
2018. FAA Order 7400.11C is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11C lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 establishes Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface within a 6.4-mile radius of Farington Field Airport,
Auburn, NE, to accommodate new standard instrument approach procedures
developed for the airport, for the safety and management of instrument
flight rules (IFR) operations.

 Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and

unlikely to result in adverse or negative comments. It, therefore: (1)
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so
minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected
to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11C,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and
effective September 15, 2018, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth

* * * * *

ACE NE E5 Auburn, NE [New]

Farington Field Airport, NE
    (Lat. 40[deg]23'12'' N, long 095[deg]47'17'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.4-mile radius of the Farington Field Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on March 1, 2019.
John Witucki,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2019-04155 Filed 3-7-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 212 (Friday, November 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75568]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24256]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 6951-018]

Tallassee Shoals, LLC; Notice of Revised Procedural Schedule for
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Project Relicense

    On September 15, 2021, Tallassee Shoals, LLC. filed an application
for a new license to continue to operate and maintain the 2.3-megawatt
Tallassee Shoals Hydroelectric Project No. 6951 (Tallassee Shoals
Project). On September 14, 2022, Commission staff issued a notice of
intent to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate the
effects of relicensing the Tallassee Shoals Project. The notice of
intent included a schedule for preparing a draft and final EA.
    By this notice, Commission staff is updating the procedural
schedule for completing a final EA. The revised schedule is shown
below. Further revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue EA...............................           January 2024.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Michael
Spencer at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email at [email protected].

    Dated: October 27, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-24256 Filed 11-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 92 (Monday, May 15, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 22280]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09724]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2017-0395]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Willamette River at Portland, OR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the Burnside Bridge across the
Willamette River, mile 12.4, at Portland, OR. This deviation is
necessary to accommodate the annual Rose Festival Grand Floral Parade
event. The deviation allows the bridge to remain in the closed-to-
navigation position to allow safe roadway movement of event
participants.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 7 a.m. to 2 p.m. on June 10,
2017.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this deviation, USCG-2017-00395 is available
at http://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number in the ``SEARCH''
box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary deviation, call or email Mr. Steven Fischer, Bridge
Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard District; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Multnomah County owns the Burnside Bridge,
crossing the Willamette River, mile 12.4, at Portland, OR, and has
requested a temporary deviation from the operating schedule. The
requested deviation is to accommodate the Rose Festival Grand Floral
Parade event. To facilitate this event, the draw of this bridge will be
allowed to be kept in the closed-to-navigation position to marine
traffic from 7 a.m. to 2 p.m. on June 10, 2017. The Burnside Bridge
provides a vertical clearance of 41 feet in the closed-to-navigation
position referenced to Columbia River Datum 0.0. The normal operating
schedule is in 33 CFR 117.897. Waterway usage on this part of the
Willamette River includes vessels ranging from commercial tug and barge
to small pleasure craft. The Coast Guard contacted all known users of
the Willamette River for comment, and we received no objections for
this deviation.
    Vessels able to pass through the bridge in the closed-to-navigation
position may do so at any time. The bridge will be able to open for
emergencies, and there is no immediate alternate route for vessels to
pass. The Coast Guard will inform the users of the waterway, through
our Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners, of the change in operating
schedule for the bridges so that vessels can arrange their transits to
minimize any impact caused by the temporary deviation.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedules immediately at the end of the effective
period of this temporary deviation. This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: May 10, 2017.
Steven M. Fischer,
Bridge Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017-09724 Filed 5-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38257-38258]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13826]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 32140; File No. 812-14525]

Guggenheim Funds Trust, et al.; Notice of Application

June 6, 2016.
AGENCY:  Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Notice of an application for an order under section 12(d)(1)(J)
of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') for an exemption
from sections 12(d)(1)(A), (B), and (C) of the Act and under sections
6(c) and 17(b) of the Act for an exemption from sections 17(a)(1) and
(2) of the Act. The requested order would permit certain registered
open-end investment companies to acquire shares of certain registered
open-end investment companies, registered closed-end investment
companies, business development companies, as defined in section
2(a)(48) of the Act (``BDCs''), and registered unit investment trusts
(collectively, ``Underlying Funds'') that are within and outside the
same group of investment companies as the acquiring investment
companies, in excess of the limits in section 12(d)(1) of the Act.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Applicants:  Guggenheim Funds Trust and Guggenheim Variable Funds
Trust, each a Delaware statutory trust and registered under the Act as
an open-end management investment company with multiple series (each, a
``Trust''); Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (``GPIM''), and Security Investors, LLC, a
Kansas limited liability company (``Security Investors''), each
registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940; and Guggenheim Funds Distributors, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, registered as a broker-dealer under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'').

Filing Dates: The application was filed on July 31, 2015, and amended
on December 16, 2015 and April 13, 2016.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing:  An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally
or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by
5:30 p.m. on July 1, 2016 and should be accompanied by proof of service
on the applicants, in the form of an affidavit, or, for lawyers, a
certificate of service. Pursuant to Rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing
requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, any facts
bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason
for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the
Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicants: Guggenheim Funds
Trust, Guggenheim Variable Funds Trust, and Guggenheim Funds
Distributors, LLC, 805 King Farm Boulevard, Suite 600, Rockville, MD
20850; Security Investors, LLC, 330 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor, New
York, NY 10022; and Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC, 100
Wilshire Boulevard, 5th Floor, Santa Monica, CA 90401.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven I. Amchan, Senior Counsel, at

(202) 551-6826, or David J. Marcinkus, Branch Chief, at<PHONE_NUMBER>
(Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Summary of the Application

    1. Applicants request an order to permit (a) a Fund \1\ (each a
``Fund of Funds'') to acquire shares of Underlying Funds \2\ in excess
of the limits in sections 12(d)(1)(A) and (C) of the Act and (b) the
Underlying Funds that are registered open-end investment companies or
series thereof, their principal underwriters and any broker or dealer
registered under the Exchange Act to sell shares of the Underlying Fund
to the Fund of Funds in excess of the limits in section 12(d)(1)(B) of
the Act.\3\ Applicants also request an order of exemption under
sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act from the prohibition on certain
affiliated transactions in section 17(a) of the Act to the extent
necessary to permit the Underlying Funds to sell their shares to, and
redeem their shares from, the Funds of Funds.\4\ Applicants state that
such transactions will be consistent with the policies of each Fund of
Funds and each Underlying Fund and with the general purposes of the Act
and will be based on the net asset values of the Underlying Funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Applicants request that the order apply to each existing and
future series of the Trusts and to each existing and future
registered open-end investment company or series thereof that is
advised by GPIM or Security Investors or their successors or by any
other investment adviser controlling, controlled by, or under common
control with GPIM or Security Investors or their successors and is
part of the same ``group of investment companies'' as the Trusts
(each, a ``Fund''). For purposes of the requested order,
``successor'' is limited to an entity that results from a
reorganization into another jurisdiction or a change in the type of
business organization. For purposes of the request for relief, the
term ``group of investment companies'' means any two or more
registered investment companies, including closed-end investment
companies or BDCs, that hold themselves out to investors as related
companies for purposes of investment and investor services.
    \2\ Certain of the Underlying Funds have obtained exemptions
from the Commission necessary to permit their shares to be listed
and traded on a national securities exchange at negotiated prices
and, accordingly, to operate as an exchange-traded fund (``ETF'').
    \3\ Applicants do not request relief for the Funds of Funds to
invest in reliance on the order in BDCs and registered closed-end
investment companies that are not listed and traded on a national
securities exchange.
    \4\ A Fund of Funds generally would purchase and sell shares of
an Underlying Fund that operates as an ETF through secondary market
transactions rather than through principal transactions with the
Underlying Fund. Applicants nevertheless request relief from section
17(a) to permit a Fund of Funds to purchase or redeem shares from
the ETF. A Fund of Funds will purchase and sell shares of an
Underlying Fund that is a closed-end fund or BDC through secondary
market transactions at market prices rather than through principal
transactions with the closed-end fund or BDC. Accordingly,
applicants are not requesting section 17(a) relief with respect to
transactions in shares of closed-end funds (including BDCs).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Certain Underlying Funds may invest up to 25% of their assets in
a wholly-owned and controlled subsidiary of the Underlying Fund
organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands as an exempted company
or under the laws of another non-U.S. jurisdiction (each, a ``Cayman
Sub''), in order to invest in commodity-related instruments and certain
other instruments. Applicants state that these Cayman Subs are created
for tax purposes in order to ensure that the Underlying Fund would
remain qualified as a regulated investment company for U.S. federal
income tax purposes.
    3. Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief
will be subject to the terms and conditions stated in the application.
Such terms and conditions are designed to, among other things, help
prevent any potential (i) undue influence over an Underlying Fund that
is not in the same ``group of investment companies'' as the Fund of
Funds through control or voting power, or in connection with certain
services, transactions, and underwritings, (ii) excessive layering of
fees, and (iii) overly complex fund structures, which are the concerns
underlying the limits in sections 12(d)(1)(A), (B), and (C) of the Act.
    4. Section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act provides that the Commission may
exempt any person, security, or transaction, or any class or classes of
persons, securities, or transactions, from any provision of section
12(d)(1) if the exemption is consistent with the public interest and
the protection of investors. Section 17(b) of the Act authorizes the
Commission to grant an order permitting a transaction otherwise
prohibited by section 17(a) if it finds that (a) the terms of the
proposed transaction are fair and reasonable and do not involve
overreaching on the part of any person concerned; (b) the proposed
transaction is consistent with the policies of each registered
investment company involved; and (c) the proposed transaction is
consistent with the general purposes of the Act. Section 6(c) of the
Act permits the Commission to exempt any persons or transactions from
any provision of the Act if such exemption is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors
and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the
Act.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-13826 Filed 6-10-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation                  Air Quality Control Minor Permit Application --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

            MINOR PERMIT APPLICATION  -  EMISSION UNIT INFORMATION  SUPPLEMENTARY FORMS FOR ASPHALT PLANTS, SOIL REMEDIATION UNITS & ROCK CRUSHERS                                         FOR A NEW STATIONARY SOURCE:  Complete this form for all emission units.

FOR A MODIFICATION TO AN EXISTING STATIONARY SOURCE: IF YOU HAVE A TITLE V PERMIT:  Complete this form for each emissions unit that is new or that is affected by the project. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A TITLE V PERMIT: Complete this form for all emissions units.                                                                                Section 1     Stationary Source Information Stationary Source Name:

Owner/Operator:                         Physical Address:                       City and Zip Code:

Asphalt Plants (Section 2)

Soil Remediation (Section 3)

Rock Crusher (Section 4)

           Have you completed Section 1, above?   Yes      No  If not, please explain:

Section 2:  Asphalt Plant If the stationary source contains an asphalt plant(s), complete this section instead of Section 2 of Emission Unit Information Form. Type of Equipment Make and Model Primary burner size (Btu per hour) Plants Production Rate  (maximum and rated) Maximum Fuel Feed Rate: Gallon/hr    Scf/hr Dryer:                                             Afterburner :                                             Dryer:                                             Afterburner :                                             Identify each piece of installed equipment by placing an "x" in the box beside the piece of equipment. If the equipment listed has a place to provide the size and capacity, provide that additional information. List only diesel engines that are stationary. Material handling devices:      Conveyors,                                 Loaders,  Bins, Elevators,                                         Screens, or                                   Chutes Dryer control devices:     Baghouse     Cyclone      Scrubber     Knockout box Any of the following:     Asphalt cement heaters,     Fuel fired silo heaters     Mixers     Pug mills     Other emission control equipment.  List:                                           Diesel engines:     Make & model           ,  Size           hp,  Max fuel rate          gal/hr     Make & model           ,  Size           hp,  Max fuel rate          gal/hr     Make & model           ,  Size           hp,  Max fuel rate          gal/hr Nearest distance from dryer exhaust outlet to:  Residence                                    miles  Other occupied structure             miles             Building use:            Was the asphalt plant constructed, modified, or reconstructed before June 11, 1973? If so, check appropriate box.     Constructed     Modified     Reconstructed If requested by the Department:   Attached is a copy of the operation and maintenance plan for the unit.   Attached is          a copy of the most recent particulate matter source test conducted within the last five years; or         a schedule for conducting the test.    For an asphalt plant within one mile of the nearest residence or occupied structure, a fugitive dust control plan is attached.

           Have you completed Section 2, above?   Yes      No  If not, please explain:

Section 3:   Soil Remediation Unit If the stationary source contains a soil remediation unit(s), complete this section instead of Section 2 of Emission Unit Information Form. Type of Equipment Make and model Plants Production Rate  (maximum and rated) Maximum fuel feed: Gallon/hr            Scf/hr Dryer, rotary kiln, combustion device in fluidized bed, etc.:                                  Afterburner :                                  Dryer, rotary kiln, combustion device in fluidized bed, etc.:                                  Afterburner :                                  Identify each piece of installed equipment by placing an "x" in the box beside the piece of equipment. If the equipment listed has a place to provide the size and capacity, provide that additional information. List only diesel engines that are stationary. Material handling devices:      Conveyors,                                 Loaders,  Bins, Elevators,                                         Screens, or                                   Chutes

Dryer control devices:     Baghouse     Cyclone      Scrubber     Knockout box     Other emission control equipment.  List:                                                                 Diesel engines:     Make & model           ,  Size           hp,  Max fuel rate          gal/hr     Make & model           ,  Size           hp,  Max fuel rate          gal/hr     Make & model           ,  Size           hp,  Max fuel rate          gal/hr  Storage areas for       Untreated soils  (Describe)                                           If storage bin provide the date installed:                 Treated soils  (Describe)                                                If storage bin provide the date installed:                  Enclosed truck loading station                   Date Installed:                    Railcar loading station                               Date Installed:                   Nearest distance from emission unit outlet to:       Residence                                    miles       Other occupied structure             miles               Building Use:                Attached is a VOC and dust control plan.

   Attached is a carbon monoxide continuous emission monitor performance test report, or schedule for conducting the test.

If requested by the Department:

  Attached is a copy of the operation and maintenance plan for the unit.   Attached is       a copy of the most recent particulate matter source test if conducted within the last five years; or      a schedule for conducting the particulate matter source test.

           Have you completed Section 3, above?   Yes      No  If not, please explain:

Section 4   Rock Crushers If the stationary source contains a rock crusher(s), complete this section for emission units related to rock crushing. Initial Crushers

Other Crushers Equipment ID. Rated capacity (tons per hour

Equipment ID. Rated capacity (tons per hour)

Other Grinding Mills

Screening Operations Equipment ID. Rated capacity (tons per hour)

Equipment ID. Rated capacity (tons per hour)

Belt Conveyors

Belt Conveyors Equipment ID. Rated capacity (tons per hour)

Equipment ID. Rated capacity (tons per hour)

Bucket Elevators

Storage Bins Equipment ID. Rated capacity (tons per hour)

Equipment ID. Rated capacity (tons per hour)

Bagging Operations

Enclosed Truck or Railcar Loading Stations Equipment ID. Rated capacity (tons per hour)

Equipment ID. Rated capacity (tons per hour)

Nearest distance from equipment listed above to:       Residence                                    miles        Other occupied structure             miles               Building Use:            If requested by the Department:

   For a rock crusher, a fugitive dust control plan is attached.

NOTE:  Rock crushers and asphalt plants may be subject to federal New Source Performance Standards (40 C.F.R. 60, Subparts I, LL, and OOO.)  The Department no longer enforces these standards through air quality minor permits.   Address all correspondence about compliance with these standards to EPA.

           Have you completed Section 4, above?   Yes      No  If not, please explain:


[Federal Register: May 29, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 104)]
[Notices]
[Page 30993]
[DOCID:fr29my08-138]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activity Seeking OMB Approval

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA invites public comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) revision of a current
information collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day
comment period soliciting comments on the following collection of
information was published on March 31, 2008, vol. 73, no. 62, page
16923. This collection of information is necessary to determine how
satisfied applicants are with the automated staffing solution.

DATES: Please submit comments by June 30, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Mauney at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

    Title: Federal Aviation Administration, SWIFT Customer Satisfaction
Survey.
    Type of Request: Extension without change of a currently approved
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0699.
    Forms(s): There are no FAA forms associated with this collection.
    Affected Public: An estimated 50,000 Respondents.
    Frequency: This information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Response: Approximately 3 minutes per
response.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An estimated 2,500 hours annually.
    Abstract: This collection of information is necessary to determine
how satisfied applicants are with the automated staffing solution. The
information will enable the FAA to improve and enhance its automated
staffing process.
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written
comments on the proposed information collection to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget.
Comments should be addressed to Nathan Lesser, Desk Officer, Department
of Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to oira--
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimates of the burden of
the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.

    Issued in Washington, DC, May 19, 2008.
Carla Mauney,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business
Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. E8-11825 Filed 5-28-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 44770]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20520]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-2508-000]

RE Gaskell West 1 LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
RE Gaskell West 1 LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is October 10, 2017.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 20, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-20520 Filed 9-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<META name="generator" content="PDFCreactiveX HTML Export">
<META name="creation-date" content="03/07/2008 12:08:04 ">
<TITLE></TITLE>