Appendix A 1. List of Control Devices in ICCR Boiler Inventory and Survey Databases, and Assignments to Ranked Controls Control Device Description Control Device Ranking Assignment Wellman Lord/ Sodium Sulfite Scrubber Wet Scrubbers Magnesium Oxide Scrubbing Wet Scrubbers Dual Alkali Scrubbing Wet Scrubbers Wet Lime Slurry Scrubbing Wet Scrubbers Sodium Carbonate Scrubbing Wet Scrubbers Sodium Alkali Scrubbing System Wet Scrubbers Alkaline Fly Ash Scrubbing Wet Scrubbers Packed Gas Absorption Column Packed scrubbers Tray Type Gas Absorption Column Wet Scrubbers Impingement Plate Scrubber Wet Scrubbers Venturi Scrubber Wet Scrubbers ( venturi if combined w/ cyclone/ ESP) Wet Scrubber High Efficiency Wet Scrubbers Wet Scrubber Medium Efficiency Wet Scrubbers Wet Scrubber Low Efficiency Wet Scrubbers Wet Scrubber, General Wet Scrubbers Gas Scrubber, General Wet Scrubbers Flue Gas Desulfurization, General Flue Gas Desulfurization Activated Carbon Adsorption Carbon Injection/ Adsorption Furnace Sorbent Injection ( Dry) Furnace Sorbent Injection Duct Sorbent Injection Duct Sorbent Injection Dry Limestone Injection Duct Sorbent Injection Limestone Injection, General Duct Sorbent Injection Wet Limestone Injection Spray Dryer Spray Tower Spray Dryer Spray Dryer, General Spray Dryer Dry Scrubbing, General Spray Dryer Fluid Bed Dry Scrubber Spray Dryer Electrostatic Precipitator High Efficiency ESP's Electrostatic Precipitator Medium Efficiency ESP's Electrostatic Precipitator Low Efficiency ESP's Dry Electrostatic Granular Filter ESP's Esp, General ESP's Fabric Filter High Temperature Fabric Filter Fabric Filter MediumTemperature Fabric Filter Fabric Filter Low Temperature Fabric Filter Fabric Filter, General Fabric Filter Multiple Cyclone w/ o Fly Cyclones Multiple Cyclone w/ Fly Part. Air Filter Ash Reinj. Cyclones Multiple Cyclone, General Cyclones Centrifuge Collection High Efficiency Cyclones Centrifuge Collection Medium Efficiency Cyclones Centrifuge Collection Low Efficiency Cyclones Wet Cyclonic Separator3 Cyclones Single Cyclone Devices Cyclones Gravity Collection High Efficiency Cyclones ( mech. collect if combined w/ ESP) Gravity Collection Medium Efficiency Cyclones ( mech. collect if combined w/ ESP) Gravity Collection Low Efficiency Cyclones ( mech. collect if combined w/ ESP) Dynamic Separator ( Dry) Cyclones ( mech. collect if combined w/ ESP) Dynamic Separator ( Wet) Cyclones ( mech. collect if combined w/ ESP) Collectors, Settling Chambers, Sep. General Cyclones ( mech. collect if combined w/ ESP)

dwcgi 7150 1077823285 571006000. xls Page 1 3/ 1/ 04 Appendix A 1. List of Control Devices in ICCR Boiler Inventory and Survey Databases, and Assignments to Ranked Controls Control Device Description Control Device Ranking Assignment Low Excess  Air Firing Not Included Control Of % O2 In Combustion Air Not Included Air To Fuel Ratio Not Included Over  Fire Air ( OFA), General Not Included Mist Eliminator High Velocity Not Included Mist Eliminator Low Velocity Not Included Baffle Not Included Catalytic Afterburner Not Included Catalytic Afterburner Heat Exchanger Not Included Direct Flame Afterburner Not Included Direct Flame Afterburner Heata Exchanger Not Included Flaring Not Included Modified Furnace/ Burner Design Not Included Staged combustion Not Included Flue Gas Recirculation Not Included Reduced Combustion Air Preheat Not Included Steam Or Water Injection Not Included Fuel  Low Nitrogen Content Not Included Air Injection Not Included Ammonia Injection Not Included Sulfur Plant Not Included Process Change Not Included Vapor Recovery System Not Included Liquid Filtration System Not Included Process Enclosed Not Included Process Gas Recovery Not Included Dust Suppression Water Spray Not Included Dust Suppression Chem Stabilization Not Included Gravel Bed Filter Roof Tank Not Included Catalytic Reduction Tank Not Included Tube And Shell Condenser Not Included Refrigerated Condenser Not Included Barometric Condenser Not Included Chemical Oxidation Not Included Chemical Reduction Not Included Chemical Neutralization Not Included Water Curtain Not Included Conservation Vent Not Included Bottom Filling Not Included Conversion To Variable Not Included Moving Bed Dry Scrubber for EFR Tank Not Included Miscellaneous Control Devices Not Included Catalytic Oxidizer ( For CO & VOC) Not Included Evaporative Cooler Not Included Low NOx Burners Not Included Pre Stratified Charge With Spark Angle Adj. Not Included Selective Non Catalytic Red. ( NH3 Or Urea Inj) Not Included Ingnition Timing Not Included Alkalized Alumina Not Included dwcgi 7150 1077823285 571006000. xls Page 2 3/ 1/ 04 Appendix A 2  MACT Floor Analysis for Large Solid Fuel Boiler Subcategory Particulate Matter/ Metals Inorganics Control Ranking Category R a n k 1 # of Units % of Units 2 Total % Control Ranking Category R a n k # of Units % of Units Total %

Cyclone/ ESP/ FF 1 5 0.15% 0.15% Cyclone/ ESP/ Packed Scrubber 2 3 0.09% 0.09%

Cyclone/ FF 1 127 3.74% 3.88% Cyclone/ Packed Scrubber 2 12 0.35% 0.44%

Cyclone/ FF/ Wet Scrubber 1 2 0.06% 3.94% ESP/ Packed Scrubber 2 1 0.03% 0.47%

Cyclone/ FF/ DSI 1 7 0.21% 4.15% Cyclone/ SD/ ESP 3 2 0.06% 0.53%

Cyclone/ SD/ FF 1 2 0.06% 4.21% Cyclone/ FF/ DSI 3 7 0.21% 0.74%

DSI/ FF 1 37 1.09% 5.30% Cyclone/ SD/ FF 3 2 0.06% 0.79%

ESP/ FF 1 6 0.18% 5.47% DSI/ FF 3 37 1.09% 1.88%

Fabric Filter 1 245 7.21% 12.68% SD/ ESP 3 8 0.24% 2.12%

Fabric Filter/ FGD 1 3 0.09% 12.77% SD/ FF 3 10 0.29% 2.41%

Fabric Filter/ Wet Scrubber 1 10 0.29% 13.06% Cyclone/ ESP/ Wet Scrubber 4 5 0.15% 2.56%

Fabric Filter/ FSI 1 14 0.41% 13.47% Cyclone/ FF/ Wet Scrubber 4 2 0.06% 2.62%

SD/ FF 1 10 0.29% 13.77% Cyclone/ Wet Scrubber 4 184 5.41% 8.03%

Cyclone/ ESP 2 247 7.27% 21.04% Cyclone/ FGD 4 1 0.03% 8.06%

Cyclone/ ESP/ Packed Scrubber 2 3 0.09% 21.12% DSI/ ESP 4 5 0.15% 8.21%

Cyclone/ ESP/ Wet Scrubber 2 5 0.15% 21.27% ESP/ Venturi/ FGD 4 7 0.21% 8.41%

Cyclone/ SD/ ESP 2 2 0.06% 21.33% ESP/ Wet Scrubber 4 11 0.32% 8.74%

DSI/ ESP 2 5 0.15% 21.48% Fabric Filter/ FGD 4 3 0.09% 8.83%

ESP 2 359 10.56% 32.04% Fabric Filter/ Wet Scrubber 4 10 0.29% 9.12%

ESP/ Venturi/ FGD 2 7 0.21% 32.24% Flue Gas Desulfurization 4 5 0.15% 9.27%

ESP/ Wet Scrubber 2 11 0.32% 32.57% Wet Scrubber 4 122 3.59% 12.86%

ESP/ FSI 2 1 0.03% 32.60% Wet Scrubber/ FGD 4 4 0.12% 12.97%

ESP/ Packed Scrubber 2 1 0.03% 32.63% Cyclone/ ESP/ FF 8 5 0.15% 13.12%

Mechanical Collector/ ESP 2 6 0.18% 32.80% Cyclone/ FF 8 127 3.74% 16.86%

SD/ ESP 2 8 0.24% 33.04% ESP/ FF 8 6 0.18% 17.03%

Cyclone 3 4 1054 31.01% 64.05% Fabric Filter 8 245 7.21% 24.24%

Cyclone/ Packed Scrubber 4 12 0.35% 64.40% Fabric Filter/ FSI 8 14 0.41% 24.65%

Cyclone/ Wet Scrubber 4 184 5.41% 69.81% Cyclone/ ESP 8 247 7.27% 31.92%

Cyclone/ FGD 4 1 0.03% 69.84% ESP 8 359 10.56% 42.48%

Flue Gas Desulfurization 5 5 0.15% 69.99% ESP/ FSI 8 1 0.03% 42.51%

Wet Scrubber 5 122 3.59% 73.58% Mechanical Collector/ ESP 8 6 0.18% 42.69%

Wet Scrubber/ FGD 5 4 0.12% 73.70% Cyclone 8 1054 31.01% 73.70%

No Control 9 894 26.30% 100.00% No Control 9 894 26.30% 100.00%

No Information 10 458 No Information 10 458 Total Number of Units in the Solid Boiler Subcategory = 3851 Total Number of Units in the Solid Subcategory with Control Information = 3399 1 Rankings are based on information in emissions database, previous EPA projects, and engineering judgement. Controls are assumed to consistently achieve a removal efficiency. The rankings are as follows:

1 = > 99% control 5 = > 50% control 2 = > 98% control 6 = > 30% control 3 = > 90% control 7 = < 30% control 4 = > 75% control 8 = no control 2 The percent of units with a control combination is based on the population for which " control" or " no control" is specified.

* This analysis only includes boilers in the Inventory v4.0 and Survey v3.0 databases that were determined to be located at major sources.

3 Cyclone efficiency is specific here only to particulate matter control because cyclones are not efficient in controlling metals.

4/ 2001 dwcgi 7150 1077823285 571006000. xls Page 3 Appendix A 3  MACT Floor Analysis for Small Solid Fuel Boiler Subcategory Particulate Matter/ Metals Inorganics Control Ranking Category R a n k 1 # of Units % of Units 2 Total % Control Ranking Category R a n k # of Units % of Units Total %

Fabric Filter 1 6 2.60% 2.60% Wet Scrubber 4 6 2.60% 2.60%

ESP 2 1 0.43% 3.03% Fabric Filter 8 6 2.60% 5.19%

Wet Scrubber 5 6 2.60% 5.63% ESP 8 1 0.43% 5.63%

Cyclone 3 8 104 45.02% 50.65% Cyclone 8 104 45.02% 50.65%

No Control 9 114 49.35% 100.00% No Control 9 114 49.35% 100.00%

No Information 10 41 No Information 10 41 Total Number of Units in the Solid Boiler Subcategory = 272 Total Number of Units in the Solid Subcategory with Control Information = 231 1 Rankings are based on information in emissions database, previous EPA projects, and engineering judgement. Controls are assumed to consistently achieve a removal efficiency. The rankings are as follows:

1 = > 99% control 5 = > 50% control 2 = > 98% control 6 = > 30% control 3 = > 90% control 7 = < 30% control 4 = > 75% control 8 = no control 2 The percent of units with a control combination is based on the population for which " control" or " no control" is specified.

* This analysis only includes boilers in the Inventory v4.0 and Survey v3.0 databases that were determined to be located at major sources.

3 Cyclone does not represent a MACT floor for the particulate matter/ metals because cyclones are not efficient in controlling metals.

4/ 2001 dwcgi 7150 1077823285 571006000. xls Page 4 Appendix A 4  MACT Floor Analysis for Limited Use Solid Boiler Subcategory Particulate Matter/ Metals Inorganics Control Ranking Category R a n k 1 # of Units % of Units 2 Total % Control Ranking Category R a n k # of Units % of Units Total %

Cyclone/ FF 1 1 0.83% 0.83% DSI/ FF 3 1 0.83% 0.83%

DSI/ FF 1 1 0.83% 1.67% Cyclone/ Wet Scrubber 4 1 0.83% 1.67%

ESP/ FF 1 1 0.83% 2.50% ESP/ Wet Scrubber 4 1 0.83% 2.50%

Fabric Filter 1 4 3.33% 5.83% Wet Scrubber 4 3 2.50% 5.00%

Cyclone/ ESP 2 3 2.50% 8.33% Cyclone/ FF 8 1 0.83% 5.83%

ESP 2 12 10.00% 18.33% ESP/ FF 8 1 0.83% 6.67%

ESP/ Wet Scrubber 2 1 0.83% 19.17% Fabric Filter 8 4 3.33% 10.00%

Cyclone 3 4 58 48.33% 67.50% Cyclone/ ESP 8 3 2.50% 12.50%

Cyclone/ Wet Scrubber 4 1 0.83% 68.33% ESP 8 12 10.00% 22.50%

Wet Scrubber 5 3 2.50% 70.83% Cyclone 8 58 48.33% 70.83%

No Control 9 35 29.17% 100.00% No Control 9 35 29.17% 100.00%

No Information 10 137 No Information 10 137 Total Number of Units in the Solid Boiler Subcategory = 257 Total Number of Units in the Solid Subcategory with Control Information = 120 1 Rankings are based on information in emissions database, previous EPA projects, and engineering judgement. Controls are assumed to consistently achieve a removal efficiency. The rankings are as follows:

1 = > 99% control 5 = > 50% control 2 = > 98% control 6 = > 30% control 3 = > 90% control 7 = < 30% control 4 = > 75% control 8 = no control 2 The percent of units with a control combination is based on the population for which " control" or " no control" is specified.

* This analysis only includes boilers in the Inventory v4.0 and Survey v3.0 databases that were determined to be located at major sources.

3 Cyclone efficiency is specific here only to particulate matter control because cyclones are not efficient in controlling metals.

4/ 2001 dwcgi 7150 1077823285 571006000. xls Page 5 Appendix A 5  MACT Floor Analysis for Large Liquid Fuel Boiler Subcategory Control Device R a n k 1 # of Units % of Units2 Total % Control Device R a n k # of Units % of Units Total %

Cyclone/ FF 1 2 0.07% 0.07% Cyclone/ Venturi 2 1 0.03% 0.03%

Fabric Filter 1 44 1.50% 1.57% Packed Scrubber 2 1 0.03% 0.07%

ESP/ Wet Scrubber 2 1 0.03% 1.60% Cyclone/ FGD 4 1 0.03% 0.10%

Cyclone/ ESP 2 2 0.07% 1.67% Cyclone/ Wet Scrubber 4 16 0.55% 0.65%

ESP 2 17 0.58% 2.25% ESP/ Wet Scrubber 4 1 0.03% 0.68%

Cyclone/ FGD 4 1 0.03% 2.28% FGD 4 4 0.14% 0.82%

Cyclone/ Venturi 4 1 0.03% 2.32% Wet Scrubber 4 70 2.39% 3.20%

Cyclone/ Wet Scrubber 4 16 0.55% 2.86% Cyclone/ FF 8 2 0.07% 3.27%

FGD 5 4 0.14% 3.00% Fabric Filter 8 44 1.50% 4.77%

Packed Scrubber 5 1 0.03% 3.03% Cyclone/ ESP 8 2 0.07% 4.84%

Wet Scrubber 5 70 2.39% 5.42% ESP 8 17 0.58% 5.42%

No Control 8 2774 94.58% 100% No Control 8 2774 94.58% 100.00%

No Information 9 2366 No Information 9 2366 Total Number of Liquid Boilers = 5299 Total Number of Liquid Boilers ( with control information) = 2933 1 Rankings are based on information in emissions database, previous EPA projects, and engineering judgement. Controls are assumed to consistently achieve a removal efficiency. The rankings are as follows:

1 = > 99% control 5 = > 50% control 2 = > 98% control 6 = > 30% control 3 = > 90% control 7 = < 30% control 4 = > 75% control 8 = no control 2 The percent of units with a control combination is based on the population for which " control" or " no control" is specified.

* This analysis includes only boilers in the Inventory v4.0 and Survey v3.0 databases that were determined to be located at major sources.

Particulate Matter/ Metals Inorganics 4/ 2001 dwcgi 7150 1077823285 571006000. xls Page 6 Appendix A 6  MACT Floor Analysis for Limited Use Liquid Boiler Subcategory Control Device R a n k 1 # of Units % of Units2 Total % Control Device R a n k # of Units % of Units Total %

Cyclone/ FF 1 2 0.41% 0.41% Cyclone/ Wet Scrubber 4 1 0.21% 0.21%

Fabric Filter 1 7 1.44% 1.86% Wet Scrubber 4 7 1.44% 1.65%

ESP 2 4 0.82% 2.68% Cyclone/ FF 8 2 0.41% 2.06%

Cyclone/ Wet Scrubber 4 1 0.21% 2.89% Fabric Filter 8 7 1.44% 3.51%

Wet Scrubber 5 7 1.44% 4.33% ESP 8 4 0.82% 4.33%

No Control 8 464 95.67% 100% No Control 8 464 95.67% 100%

No Information 9 780 No Information 9 780 Total Number of Liquid Boilers = 1265 Total Number of Liquid Boilers ( with control information) = 485 1 Rankings are based on information in emissions database, previous EPA projects, and engineering judgement. Controls are assumed to consistently achieve a removal efficiency. The rankings are as follows:

1 = > 99% control 5 = > 50% control 2 = > 98% control 6 = > 30% control 3 = > 90% control 7 = < 30% control 4 = > 75% control 8 = no control 2 The percent of units with a control combination is based on the population for which " control" or " no control" is specified.

* This analysis includes only boilers in the Inventory v4.0 and Survey v3.0 databases that were determined to be located at major sources.

Particulate Matter/ Metals Inorganics 4/ 2001 dwcgi 7150 1077823285 571006000. xls Page 7 Appendix A 7  MACT Floor Analysis for Small Liquid Fuel Boiler Subcategory Control Device R a n k 1 # of Units % of Units2 Total % Control Device R a n k # of Units % of Units Total %

Cyclone/ FF 1 6 0.73% 0.73% Wet Scrubber 4 3 0.37% 0.37%

Fabric Filter 1 17 2.08% 2.81% Cyclone/ FF 8 6 0.73% 1.10%

ESP 2 1 0.12% 2.93% Fabric Filter 8 17 2.08% 3.17%

Wet Scrubber 5 3 0.37% 3.30% ESP 8 1 0.12% 3.30%

No Control 8 792 96.70% 100.00% No Control 8 792 96.70% 100.00%

No Information 9 751 No Information 9 751 Total Number of Liquid Boilers = 1570 Total Number of Liquid Boilers ( with control information) = 819 1 Rankings are based on information in emissions database, previous EPA projects, and engineering judgement. Controls are assumed to consistently achieve a removal efficiency. The rankings are as follows:

1 = > 99% control 5 = > 50% control 2 = > 98% control 6 = > 30% control 3 = > 90% control 7 = < 30% control 4 = > 75% control 8 = no control 2 The percent of units with a control combination is based on the population for which " control" or " no control" is specified.

* This analysis includes only boilers in the Inventory v4.0 and Survey v3.0 databases that were determined to be located at major sources.

Particulate Matter/ Metals Inorganics 4/ 2001 dwcgi 7150 1077823285 571006000. xls Page 8 Appendix A 8  MACT Floor Analysis for Large Gaseous Fuel Subcategory Particulate Matter/ Metals ( not expected to be present in gas) Inorganics Control Combination R a n k 1 # of Units % of Units 2 Total % Control Combination R a n k # of Units % of Units Total %

No Control 13575 100.00% 100.00% No Control 13575 100.00% 100.00%

No Information 14651 No Information 14651 Number of Gas Boilers = 28226 Number of Gas Boilers with Control Information = 13575 1 Rankings are based on information in emissions database, previous EPA projects, and engineering judgement. Controls are assumed to consistently achieve a removal efficiency. The rankings are as follows:

1 = > 99% control 5 = > 50% control 2 = > 98% control 6 = > 30% control 3 = > 90% control 7 = < 30% control 4 = > 75% control 8 = no control 2 The percent of units with a control combination is based on the population for which " control" or " no control" is specified.

* This analysis only includes boilers in the Inventory v4.0 and Survey v2.0 databases that were determined to be located at major sources.

4/ 2001 dwcgi 7150 1077823285 571006000. xls Page 9 Appendix A 9  MACT Floor Analysis for Small Gaseous Fuel Subcategory Particulate Matter/ Metals ( not expected to be present in gas) Inorganics Control Combination R a n k 1 # of Units % of Units 2 Total % Control Combination R a n k # of Units % of Units Total %

No Control 9652 100.00% 100.00% No Control 9652 100.00% 100.00%

No Information 11715 No Information 11715 Number of Gas Boilers = 21367 Number of Gas Boilers with Control Information = 9652 1 Rankings are based on information in emissions database, previous EPA projects, and engineering judgement. Controls are assumed to consistently achieve a removal efficiency. The rankings are as follows:

1 = > 99% control 5 = > 50% control 2 = > 98% control 6 = > 30% control 3 = > 90% control 7 = < 30% control 4 = > 75% control 8 = no control 2 The percent of units with a control combination is based on the population for which " control" or " no control" is specified.

* This analysis only includes boilers in the Inventory v4.0 and Survey v2.0 databases that were determined to be located at major sources.

4/ 2001 dwcgi 7150 1077823285 571006000. xls Page 10 Appenidx A 10. MACT Floor Analysis for Limited Use Gaseous Fuel Subcategory Particulate Matter/ Metals ( not expected to be present in gas) Inorganics Control Combination R a n k 1 # of Units % of Units 2 Total % Control Combination R a n k # of Units % of Units Total %

No Control 1246 100.00% 100.00% No Control 1246 100.00% 100.00%

No Information 1693 No Information 1693 Number of Gas Boilers = 2939 Number of Gas Boilers with Control Information = 1246 1 Rankings are based on information in emissions database, previous EPA projects, and engineering judgement. Controls are assumed to consistently achieve a removal efficiency. The rankings are as follows:

1 = > 99% control 5 = > 50% control 2 = > 98% control 6 = > 30% control 3 = > 90% control 7 = < 30% control 4 = > 75% control 8 = no control 2 The percent of units with a control combination is based on the population for which " control" or " no control" is specified.

* This analysis only includes boilers in the Inventory v4.0 and Survey v2.0 databases that were determined to be located at major sources.

4/ 2001 dwcgi 7150 1077823285 571006000. xls Page 11 Appendix B 1  State CO Monitoring Requirements and Applicability to Gas Boiler Subcategory ( based on State Regulations as applied to Inventory v4 and Survey v2 databases)

GCP Requirement State # Units Affected % of Subcategory Affected*

Gas fired units California 449 Massachusetts 13 Texas 0 Total 462 1.72% Liquid fired units California 83 Massachusetts 175 Texas 0 Total 258 2.08% Solid fired units California 35 Massachusetts 21 Texas 1 Total 57 1.36%

* The percent of boilers affected in the subcategory is based on the population of boilers in the subcategory for which the applicability of the GCP requirement could be assessed.

1/ 21/ 99 GCPREV2. XLS Page 12 Appendix C 1. Calculation of PM Emission Limits for Existing Large Solid Fired Units Test ID Facility Name Fuel Type Control Level Avg Emissio Lowest Highest Variability Factor ( Highes/ lowest) Comment E604.001 J. M. Huber Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.065 6.50E 02 6.50E 02 a New Data Michigan State University  Unit 1 Coal Fabric Filter 0.0211 New Data Michigan State University  Unit 2 Coal Fabric Filter 0.0191 New Data Michigan State University  Unit 4 Coal Fabric Filter 0.0054 f E605.001 Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group Coal Fabric Filter 0.0433 E605.002 Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group Coal Fabric Filter 0.0338 0.03855 3.38E 02 4.33E 02 1.28E+ 00 a E642.001 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.0130 E642.002 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.1480 b E643.001 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFFFabric Filter 0.0073 E643.002 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFFFabric Filter 0.0139 E645.001 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFFFabric Filter 0.0042 E645.002 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFFFabric Filter 0.0028 0.0083 2.82E 03 1.30E 02 4.61E+ 00 E697.006c James River Paper Company Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFFFabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 0.0156 E697.010c James River Paper Company NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid or GFabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 0.00607 0.010835 6.07E 03 1.56E 02 2.57E+ 00 E738.002 Kimberly Clark Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.0274 E738.003 Kimberly Clark Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.0702 E739.001 Kimberly Clark Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.0146 E739.002 Kimberly Clark Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.0104 E739.003 Kimberly Clark Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.0283 0.0302 1.04E 02 7.02E 02 6.75E+ 00 E795.006 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFFFabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.0032 E795.023 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFFFabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.0020 E797.011 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFFFabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.00528 E797.020 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFFFabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.0284 E798a. 011 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFFFabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.0030 E798a. 025 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.0011 E798b. 001 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFFFabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.0018 0.0064 1.10E 03 5.28E 03 4.80E+ 00 E834b. 001 Yellowstone Energy Limited Partnership Coal Fabric Filter 0.0405 E834b. 002 Yellowstone Energy Limited Partnership Coal Fabric Filter 0.0152 E834b. 003 Yellowstone Energy Limited Partnership Coal Fabric Filter 0.0040 0.0199 4.00E 03 4.05E 02 1.01E+ 01 E883.003 Weyerhaeuser Paper Company Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFFF/ Wet Scrubber 0.0096 E883.004 Weyerhaeuser Paper Company Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFFF/ Wet Scrubber 0.0164 E884.002 Weyerhaeuser Paper Company Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFFF/ Wet Scrubber 0.0109 0.0123 9.63E 03 1.64E 02 1.70E+ 00 Average of average emission levelsc 0.0148 Average variability factord 4.5484 Emission Limit with variabilitye 0.07 a Average emission level not included in top 12 percent.

b Emission point is an outlier and not used in analysis.

c Calculated by averaging all the average emission factors except ones that are not in the top 12 percent.

d Calculated by averaging all the variability factors.

e Calculated by multiplying variability factor and average emission level.

f Best controlled source for new source analysis. Appendix C 2. Total Selected Metals MACT Floor Emission Level Analysis for Solid Fuel Subcategories ID Material Control Level Total Selected Metals EF ( lb/ MMMBtu)  Sorted from Highest to Lowest Corresponding PM EF ( lb/ MMBtu)

E232.001c Coal ESP 0.00041566** 2.320E 02 E692.003 Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 3.787E 04 1.440E 02 E208a. 001c Coal ESP 3.376E 04 2.030E 01 E208b. 001c Coal ESP 3.089E 04 1.120E 01 E204.005c Coal ESP 2.873E 04 9.230E 02 E740.001 Wood ESP 2.842E 04 6.750E 02 E692.001 Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 2.810E 04 1.380E 02 E692.002 Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 2.579E 04 1.080E 02 E232.002c Coal ESP 2.390E 04 1.310E 02 E204.004c Coal ESP 2.321E 04 1.940E 08 E209b. 002c Coal ESP 2.220E 04 3.860E 02 E735.019 Coal ESP 1.998E 04 8.180E 02 E209a. 002c Coal ESP 1.674E 04 1.960E 02 E202.001c1 Coal ESP 1.545E 04 1.080E 01 E236.001c Coal ESP 1.531E 04 1.870E 02 E735.022 Coal ESP 1.331E 04 3.330E 02 E200.001C Coal ESP 1.170E 04 2.010E 02 E735.015 Coal ESP 9.677E 05 1.220E 01 E229.002c1 Coal ESP 7.136E 05 8.240E 02 E740.003 Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 7.102E 05 1.130E 01 E206.001c1 Coal Fabric Filter 0.000063425*** 2.480E 03 E221.001c2 Coal ESP/ Flue Gas Desulfurization 6.135E 05 3.920E 02 E739.001 Wood Fabric Filter 5.598E 05 1.460E 02 E203.001c Coal Fabric Filter 5.562E 05 7.380E 03 E202.001c2 Coal ESP/ Flue Gas Desulfurization 5.293E 05 1.110E 02 E268.002 Wood ESP 4.089E 05 2.240E 03 E221.001c1 Coal ESP 3.375E 05 8.000E 02 E222.002cdup Coal ESP/ SD 3.230E 05 1.210E 02 E523.003 Wood ESP 2.888E 05 1.000E 02 E404.001 Wood ESP 2.888E 05 1.440E 03 E222.002c Coal ESP/ SD 2.796E 05 7.950E 03 E206.001c3 Coal Fabric Filter 2.666E 05 2.810E 02 E229.002c2 Coal ESP/ Flue Gas Desulfurization 2.658E 05 1.000E 02 E738.002 Wood Fabric Filter 2.036E 05 2.740E 02 E230.001c Coal ESP 1.657E 05 2.380E 02 E224.016 Coal Fabric Filter 9.027E 06 1.660E 03 E11 Coal ESP/ Venturi Scrubber 3.956E 06 1.440E 03 E224.022 Coal Fabric Filter 3.586E 06 1.200E 03 E218.003 Coal ESP 2.649E 06 1.320E 03 *** This test is the basis for the new source floor emission limit for total selected metals with a corresponding PM emission level of 0.00248 lb/ MMBtu.

** This test is the basis for the existing source floor emission limit for total selected metals with a corresponding PM emission level of 0.0232 lb/ MMBtu. Appendix C 3. Calculation of HCl Emission Limts for Large Solid Fired Units Test ID Facility Name Fuel Type Control Level Avg Emission Factor ( lb/ MMBtu) Lowest Highest Variability Factor ( Highes/ lowest) Comments E27.003 Delano Energy Company, Inc. Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 0.00952 E27.010 Delano Energy Company, Inc. Wood Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 0.0102 0.00986 9.52E 03 1.02E 02 1.07E+ 00 E607.001 Georgia Pacific Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Cyclone/ Spray Dryer 0.0211 E607.002 Georgia Pacific Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Cyclone/ Spray Dryer 0.0018 E608.003 Georgia Pacific Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Cyclone/ Spray Dryer 0.0258 0.016233333 1.80E 03 2.58E 02 1.43E+ 01 E614.004 American Ref Fuel Company Wood ESP/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 0.0476 a E697.004c James River Paper Company Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 0.00389 E697.012c James River Paper Company NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid or Gas/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 0.0156 E697.012u James River Paper Company NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid or Gas/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Limestone Injection ( DSI) 0.108 0.042496667 3.89E 03 1.56E 02 4.01E+ 00 E794.004 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.00289 E795.006 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.000349 E795.023 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.000236 E797.008 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.00251 E797.017 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.00534 E798a. 008 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.000463 E798a. 022 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.000373 E798b. 001 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.00116 0.001665125 2.36E 04 5.34E 03 2.26E+ 01 E735.005 Champion International Corp. Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Venturi Scrubber 0.00242 E784.004 Inland Paperboard and Packaging, Inc. Gas/ Wood/ Other Biomass/ Liquid FF Venturi Scrubber 0.000434 E958.003 Champion International Corporation Gas/ Wood/ Other Biomass/ Liquid FF Venturi Scrubber 0.00382 E986.001 International Paper Company Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Venturi Scrubber 0.0000996 b E986.007 International Paper Company Gas/ Wood/ Other Biomass/ Liquid FF Venturi Scrubber 0.0000296 0.0000646 2.96E 05 9.96E 05 3.36E+ 00 Average of average emission levelsc 0.0096 Average variability factord 9.08 Emission Limit with variabilitye 0.09 a Average emision level not included in top 12 percent.

b Best controlled source for new source analysis.

c Calculated by averaging all the average emission factors except ones that are not in the top 12 percent.

d Calculated by averaging all the variability factors.

e Calculated by multiplying variability factor and average emission level. Page 15 Appendix C 4. Calculation of Mercury Emission Limts for Existing Large Solid Fired Units Test ID Facility Name Fuel Type Control Level Avg Emission Factor ( lb/ MMBtu) Lowest Highest Variability Factor ( Highes/ Lowest) Comment E27.001 Delano Energy Company, Inc. Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 6.22E 07 E27.008 Delano Energy Company, Inc. Wood Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 4.28E 07 E833.005 Delano Energy Company, Inc. Wood Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 7.52E 09 E833.006 Delano Energy Company, Inc. Wood Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 7.56E 09 2.66E 07 7.52E 09 6.22E 07 8.27E+ 01 f E15.002 GWF Power Systems Co.:

Hanford Site Coal Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 5.26E 07 E20.004 GWF Power Systems Co.:

Hanford Site Coal Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 5.04E 07 5.15E 07 5.04E 07 5.26E 07 1.04E+ 00 f E697.007 James River Paper Company Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 6.06E 06 E697.011 James River Paper Company NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid or Gas/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 9.80E 06 7.93E 06 6.06E 06 9.80E 06 1.62E+ 00 E738.002 Kimberly Clark Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 1.08E 06 E739.001 Kimberly Clark Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 2.81E 07 6.81E 07 2.81E 07 1.08E 06 3.84E+ 00 E1.006 National Cogeneration Plant Coal Fabric Filter 5.15E 06 E794.001 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Wood Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 1.85E 06 E795.005 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 1.51E 06 E795.013 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Wood Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 1.37E 06 E795.021 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 1.26E 06 E797.010 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 3.59E 06 E797.019 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 2.73E 06 E798a. 010 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 2.80E 06 E798a. 024 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Wood Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 4.37E 06 E798b. 006 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 1.40E 06 Revised to DL 2.24E 06 1.26E 06 4.37E 06 3.47E+ 00 New Data Michigan State University Unit 1 Coal Fabric Filter 4.97E 06 New Data Michigan State University Unit 2 Coal Fabric Filter 5.20E 06 New Data Michigan State University Unit 4 Coal Fabric Filter 2.30E 07 a E1021.001 CAPCO Co generation Plant Coal Fabric Filter 1.08E 05 b Average of average emission levelsc 3.02E 06 Average variability factord 2.98E+ 00 Emission Limit with variabilitye 9.00E 06 a Best controlled source for new source analysis.

b average emission level not included in top 12 percent.

c Calculated by averaging all the average emission factors except ones that are not in top 12 percent d Calculated by averaging all the variability factors e Calculated by multiplying variability factor and average emission level.

f Variability factor not included in average variability , all test results were detection limit. Page 16 Appendix C 5. Calculation of PM Emission Limits for Existing Limited Use Solid Units Test IDf Facility Name Fuel Type Control Level Avg Emission Factor ( lb/ MMBtu) Lowest Highest Highes/ lowest E735.015 Champion International Corp. Coal ESP 0.1220 E735.019 Champion International Corp. Coal ESP 0.0818 E627.007 Champion International Coal ESP 0.0391 0.029 0.048 1.630 E735.022 Champion International Corp. Coal ESP 0.0333 E925.001 Southeast Paper Manufacturing Company Coal ESP 0.0048 E683.004 Consolidated Papers, Inc  Wisconsin River Plant Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0849 0.049 0.121 2.480 E684.001 Niagara of Wisconsin Paper Co. Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0836 E722.001 Blandin Paper Co. Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0259 0.005 0.047 9.611 E692.003 Packaging Corporation of America Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0096 0.004 0.014 3.710 E688.001 Temple Inland Forest Products Corporation Wood ESP 0.2720 a E930.001 Georgia Pacific Corporation  Hardboard Plant Wood ESP 0.1170 a E740.003 Grays Harbor Paper Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0903 0.068 0.113 1.674 a E610.002c Georgia Pacific Wood ESP 0.0789 0.019 0.196 10.208 a E265.003 Pacific Oroville Power Company Wood ESP 0.0524 0.020 0.091 4.653 a E906.001 International Paper  Ticonderoga Mill NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid or Gas/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0509 a E536.001 Northern State Power Bay Front Steam Plant Wood ESP 0.0478 a E724.010 Craven County Wood Energy Plant Wood ESP 0.0402 0.029 0.051 1.759 a E767.006 Alaska Pulp Corporation NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid or Gas/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP/ Flue Gas Desulfurization 0.0390 a E706.018 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0302 0.005 0.145 27.103 a E935.002 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0222 0.016 0.029 1.858 a E675.001 Boise Cascade Paper Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0203 0.005 0.044 8.277 a E767.001 Alaska Pulp Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0178 a E628.001 Willamette Industries Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0165 a E614.001 American Ref Fuel Company Wood ESP/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 0.0162 a E1026.051 NR  site 2 Wood ESP 0.0161 0.001 0.080 70.973 a E783a. 004 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0159 0.006 0.032 4.915 a E266.002 Pacific Gas & Electric Company Wood ESP 0.0126 a E529.001 NR Wood ESP 0.0125 E779.017 Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0107 0.001 0.025 17.431 E522.001 Viking Energy of McBain Wood ESP 0.0101 0.005 0.018 4.049 E710.001 Koppers Industries, Inc. Wood ESP 0.0094 E734.004 LFC Power Systems Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0089 0.004 0.016 4.201 E679.008 Consolidated Papers, Inc. NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid or Gas/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0076 E527.001 BVTBC Genesee Power Station Wood ESP 0.0044 0.000 0.021 7033.333 E613.001 American Ref Fuel Company Wood ESP 0.0044 E268.003 Sierra Pacific Wood ESP 0.0039 0.002 0.006 2.518 E765.002 Smurfit Newsprint Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0032 0.003 0.003 1.048 E600.012 Washington Water Power Co. Gas/ Wood/ Other Biomass/ Liquid FF ESP 0.0017 0.001 0.003 2.259 E604.001 J. M. Huber Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.065 E605.002 Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group Coal Fabric Filter 0.039 0.034 0.043 1.281 E739.003 Kimberly Clark Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.030 0.010 0.070 6.750 E834b. 003 Yellowstone Energy Limited Partnership Coal Fabric Filter 0.020 0.004 0.041 10.125 E884.002 Weyerhaeuser Paper Company Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid FF/ Wet Scrubber 0.012 0.010 0.016 1.703 E697.010c James River Paper Company NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid or Gas/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 0.011 0.006 0.016 2.570 E645.002 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter 0.008 0.003 0.013 4.610 E798b. 001 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.006 0.001 0.005 4.800 E1020.002 Energy Products of Idaho, Inc. NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid or Gas/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter 0.002 0.002 0.002 1.234 Average Emission Limitb 0.0273 Variability Factorc 8.11E+ 00 Average incorporating variabilityd 0.221718 a average emission level not included in top 12 percent.

b Calculated by averaging all the average emission factors except ones that are not in top 12 percent c Calculated by averaging all the variability factors d Calculated by multiplying variability factor and average emission level.

f Faciltiy/ test have more than one test ID associated with it. Only one test ID from the test reports was included as an identifier for the facility. See Appendix C 6 for detailed emissions information for each test. Coal ESP Biomass ESP Comment Fabric Filters Page 17 Appendix C 6. Calculation of PM Emission Limits for Existing Limited Use Solid Units ( Detailed Emissions Information)

Test ID Facility Name Fuel Type Control Level Avg Emission Factor ( lb/ MMBtu) Lowest Highest Highes/ lowe st Comment E767.001 Alaska Pulp Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0178 E767.006 Alaska Pulp Corporation NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid or Gas/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP/ Flue Gas Desulfurization 0.039 E613.001 American Ref Fuel Company Wood ESP 0.00443 E614.001 American Ref Fuel Company Wood ESP/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 0.0162 E721.001 Blandin Paper Co. Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.047 E722.001 Blandin Paper Co. Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.00489 0.025945 4.89E 03 4.70E 02 9.61E+ 00 E676.004 Boise Cascade  White Paper Division Facility Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.016 E676.005 Boise Cascade  White Paper Division Facility Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0119 E674.001 Boise Cascade Paper Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0442 E674.002 Boise Cascade Paper Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.024 E675.001 Boise Cascade Paper Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.00534 0.020288 5.34E 03 4.42E 02 8.28E+ 00 E617.001 BVTBC Genesee Power Station Wood ESP 0.0211 E618.003 BVTBC Genesee Power Station Wood ESP 0.00195 E619.001 BVTBC Genesee Power Station Wood ESP 0.0026 E620.002 BVTBC Genesee Power Station Wood ESP 0.003 E525.001 BVTBC Genesee Power Station Wood ESP 0.000262 E526.001 BVTBC Genesee Power Station Wood ESP 0.00211 E527.001 BVTBC Genesee Power Station Wood ESP 0.000003 0.0044321 3.00E 06 2.11E 02 7.03E+ 03 E627.001 Champion International Coal ESP 4.59E 08 a E627.003 Champion International Coal ESP 0.0402 E627.005 Champion International Coal ESP 0.0478 E627.007 Champion International Coal ESP 0.0293333 0.0391111 2.93E 02 4.78E 02 1.63E+ 00 E735.015 Champion International Corp. Coal ESP 0.122 E735.019 Champion International Corp. Coal ESP 0.0818 E735.022 Champion International Corp. Coal ESP 0.0333 E683.001 Consolidated Papers, Inc  Wisconsin River Plant Coal ESP 0.0488 E683.004 Consolidated Papers, Inc  Wisconsin River Plant Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.121 0.0849 4.88E 02 1.21E 01 2.48E+ 00 E679.008 Consolidated Papers, Inc. NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid or Gas/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.00761 E724.001 Craven County Wood Energy Plant Wood ESP 0.0512 E724.010 Craven County Wood Energy Plant Wood ESP 0.0291 0.04015 2.91E 02 5.12E 02 1.76E+ 00 E610.001cn Georgia Pacific Wood ESP 0.0192 E610.001cs Georgia Pacific Wood ESP 0.0216 E610.002c Georgia Pacific Wood ESP 0.196 0.0789333 1.92E 02 1.96E 01 1.02E+ 01 E706.001 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood ESP 0.0323 E706.002 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood ESP 0.0273 E706.004 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood ESP 0.0104 E706.005 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood ESP 0.0112 E706.006 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood ESP 0.027 E706.008 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood ESP 0.0192 E706.009 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.00535 E706.010 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.00936 E706.011 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0329 Page 18 Appendix C 6. Calculation of PM Emission Limits for Existing Limited Use Solid Units ( Detailed Emissions Information)

Test ID Facility Name Fuel Type Control Level Avg Emission Factor ( lb/ MMBtu) Lowest Highest Highes/ lowe st Comment E706.012 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.145 E706.013 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0157 E706.014 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0586 E706.015 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0289 E706.016 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0226 E706.017 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0116 E706.018 Georgia Pacific  Brunswick Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0258 0.0302006 5.35E 03 1.45E 01 2.71E+ 01 E935.001 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0155 E935.002 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0288 0.02215 1.55E 02 2.88E 02 1.86E+ 00 E783a. 001 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood ESP 0.00645 E783a. 002 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0105 E783a. 003 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0149 E783a. 004 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0317 0.0158875 6.45E 03 3.17E 02 4.91E+ 00 E930.001 Georgia Pacific Corporation  Hardboard Plant Wood ESP 0.117 E740.001 Grays Harbor Paper Wood ESP 0.0675 E740.003 Grays Harbor Paper Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.113 0.09025 6.75E 02 1.13E 01 1.67E+ 00 E906.001 International Paper  Ticonderoga Mill NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid or Gas/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0509 E710.001 Koppers Industries, Inc. Wood ESP 0.00942 E734.001 LFC Power Systems Corporation Wood ESP 0.0069 E734.002 LFC Power Systems Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.00947 E734.003 LFC Power Systems Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.00369 E734.004 LFC Power Systems Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0155 0.00889 3.69E 03 1.55E 02 4.20E+ 00 E684.001 Niagara of Wisconsin Paper Co. Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0836 E536.001 Northern State Power Bay Front Steam Plant Wood ESP 0.0478 E529.001 NR Wood ESP 0.0125 E1026.001 NR  site 2 Wood ESP 0.00628 E1026.002 NR  site 2 Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0802 E1026.003 NR  site 2 Wood ESP 0.00113 E1026.005 NR  site 2 Wood ESP 0.0123 E1026.006 NR  site 2 Wood ESP 0.00717 E1026.011 NR  site 2 Wood ESP 0.00356 E1026.021 NR  site 2 Wood ESP 0.0117 E1026.031 NR  site 2 Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0159 E1026.051 NR  site 2 Wood ESP 0.00655 0.0160878 1.13E 03 8.02E 02 7.10E+ 01 E266.002 Pacific Gas & Electric Company Wood ESP 0.0126 E530.001 Pacific Oroville Power Wood ESP 0.0912 E530.004 Pacific Oroville Power Wood ESP 0.0196 E265.001 Pacific Oroville Power Company Wood ESP 0.0196 E265.003 Pacific Oroville Power Company Wood ESP 0.0792 0.0524 1.96E 02 9.12E 02 4.65E+ 00 E693.001 Packaging Corporation of America Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.00372 E693.002 Packaging Corporation of America Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.00527 Page 19 Appendix C 6. Calculation of PM Emission Limits for Existing Limited Use Solid Units ( Detailed Emissions Information)

Test ID Facility Name Fuel Type Control Level Avg Emission Factor ( lb/ MMBtu) Lowest Highest Highes/ lowe st Comment E692.001 Packaging Corporation of America Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0138 E692.002 Packaging Corporation of America Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0108 E692.003 Packaging Corporation of America Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0144 0.009598 3.72E 03 1.38E 02 3.71E+ 00 E268.002 Sierra Pacific Wood ESP 0.00224 E268.003 Sierra Pacific Wood ESP 0.00564 0.00394 2.24E 03 5.64E 03 2.52E+ 00 E765.001 Smurfit Newsprint Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.00314 E765.002 Smurfit Newsprint Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.00329 0.003215 3.14E 03 3.29E 03 1.05E+ 00 E925.001 Southeast Paper Manufacturing Company Coal ESP 0.00484 E688.001 Temple Inland Forest Products Corporation Wood ESP 0.272 E518.001 Viking Energy of McBain Wood ESP 0.0118 E519.001 Viking Energy of McBain Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0183 E520.001 Viking Energy of McBain Wood ESP 0.00452 E521.001 Viking Energy of McBain Wood ESP 0.00882 E522.001 Viking Energy of McBain Wood ESP 0.00705 0.010098 4.52E 03 1.83E 02 4.05E+ 00 E600.001 Washington Water Power Co. Wood ESP 0.00143 E600.003 Washington Water Power Co. Wood ESP 0.00253 E600.006 Washington Water Power Co. Wood ESP 0.0024 E600.008 Washington Water Power Co. Wood ESP 0.00112 E600.012 Washington Water Power Co. Gas/ Wood/ Other Biomass/ Liquid FF ESP 0.00114 0.001724 1.12E 03 2.53E 03 2.26E+ 00 E404.001 Wheelabrator Shasta energy Company Wood ESP 0.00144 E404.004 Wheelabrator Shasta energy Company Wood ESP 0.00148 E523.003 Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Wood ESP 0.01 E779.006 Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Wood ESP 0.0081 E779.007 Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0228 E779.008 Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0251 E779.013 Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Wood ESP 0.00552 E779.015 Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0112 E779.017 Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0105 0.0106822 1.44E 03 2.51E 02 1.74E+ 01 E628.001 Willamette Industries Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 0.0165 Page 20 Appendix C 6. Calculation of PM Emission Limits for Existing Limited Use Solid Units ( Detailed Emissions Information)

Test ID Facility Name Fuel Type Control Level Avg Emission Factor ( lb/ MMBtu) Lowest Highest Highes/ lowe st Comment E604.001 J. M. Huber Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.065 6.50E 02 6.50E 02 E1020.001 Energy Products of Idaho, Inc. Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter 0.0019 E1020.002 Energy Products of Idaho, Inc. NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid or Gas/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter 0.00154 0.00172 1.54E 03 1.90E 03 1.23E+ 00 E605.001 Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group Coal Fabric Filter 0.0433 E605.002 Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group Coal Fabric Filter 0.0338 0.03855 3.38E 02 4.33E 02 1.28E+ 00 E642.001 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.0130 E642.002 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.1480 a E643.001 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter 0.0073 E643.002 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter 0.0139 E645.001 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter 0.0042 E645.002 Georgia Pacific Corporation Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter 0.0028 0.0083 2.82E 03 1.30E 02 4.61E+ 00 E697.006c James River Paper Company Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 0.0156 E697.010c James River Paper Company NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid or Gas/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 0.00607 0.010835 6.07E 03 1.56E 02 2.57E+ 00 E738.002 Kimberly Clark Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.0274 E738.003 Kimberly Clark Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.0702 E739.001 Kimberly Clark Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.0146 E739.002 Kimberly Clark Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.0104 E739.003 Kimberly Clark Corporation Wood Fabric Filter 0.0283 0.0302 1.04E 02 7.02E 02 6.75E+ 00 E795.006 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.0032 E795.023 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.0020 E797.011 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.00528 E797.020 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.0284 E798a. 011 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.0030 E798a. 025 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.0011 E798b. 001 Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc.  Ridge Generating Station Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 0.0018 0.0064 1.10E 03 5.28E 03 4.80E+ 00 E834b. 001 Yellowstone Energy Limited Partnership Coal Fabric Filter 0.0405 E834b. 002 Yellowstone Energy Limited Partnership Coal Fabric Filter 0.0152 E834b. 003 Yellowstone Energy Limited Partnership Coal Fabric Filter 0.0040 0.0199 4.00E 03 4.05E 02 1.01E+ 01 E883.003 Weyerhaeuser Paper Company Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid FF/ Wet Scrubber 0.0096 E883.004 Weyerhaeuser Paper Company Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid FF/ Wet Scrubber 0.0164 E884.002 Weyerhaeuser Paper Company Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid FF/ Wet Scrubber 0.0109 0.0123 9.63E 03 1.64E 02 1.70E+ 00 a Point is an outlier and not used in analyses. Page 21 Appendix C 7. Mercury and Chlorine Fuel Data From Utility Boilersa Plant name Unit name Boiler/ NOx type PM control SOx control name of fuel 1 average Hg in fuel ( ppmw) Name of Fuel 2 Cl in test coal ( ppm)

Bruce Mansfield 1 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY PARTSCRUB NONE PETROLEUM COKEb 0.0100 BITUMINOUS 767 Craig C3 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY BAGHOUSE SDA SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0254 SUBBITUMINOUS 117 Craig C1 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP HS WETSCRUB SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0254 SUBBITUMINOUS 267 Bailly 7 CYCLONE/ NONOX/ WET ESP CS WETSCRUB BITUMINOUS  LOW SULFUR 0.0254 BITUMINOUS 646 AES Hawaii, Inc. A FBC/ SNCR BAGHOUSE FBC SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0279 SUBBITUMINOUS 46 Bay Front Plant Generating 5 CYCLONE/ NONOX/ WET MECH COMP COAL BITUMINOUS 0.0289 BITUMINOUS 127 Presque Isle 6 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ WET ESP CS COMP COAL BITUMINOUS/ PETROLEUM COKE 0.0300 BITUMINOUS/ PETCOKE 197 Presque Isle 5 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ WET ESP CS COMP COAL BITUMINOUS/ PETROLEUM COKE 0.0300 BITUMINOUS/ PETCOKE 190 Presque Isle 9 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ WET ESP HS COMP COAL BITUMINOUS/ PETROLEUM COKE 0.0300 SUBBITUMINOUS 223 TNP One U2 FBC/ NONOX BAGHOUSE FBC LIGNITE 0.0310 LIGNITE 133 St Clair Power Plant 4 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ DRY ESP CS COMP COAL SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0344 SUBBITUMINOUS/ BITUMINOUS 333 Big Bend BB03 CONV/ TURBO/ NOX/ WET ESP CS WETSCRUB SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0348 BITUMINOUS 1767 Navajo 3 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ DRY ESP HS WETSCRUB BITUMINOUS 0.0374 BITUMINOUS 150 Valmont 5 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY BAGHOUSE COMP COAL BITUMINOUS 0.0388 BITUMINOUS 39 Intermountain 2SGA CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY BAGHOUSE WETSCRUB BITUMINOUS 0.0391 BITUMINOUS 200 Stockton Cogen Company GEN1 FBC/ SNCR BAGHOUSE FBC BITUMINOUS 0.0404 BITUMINOUS/ PETCOKE 583 Montrose 1 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS COMP COAL SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0422 SUBBITUMINOUS 133 Rawhide 101 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY BAGHOUSE SDA SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0469 SUBBITUMINOUS 127 Valley 2 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY BAGHOUSE NONE BITUMINOUS/ PETROLEUM COKE 0.0475 BITUMINOUS/ PETCOKE 128 Shawnee Fossil Plant 3 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY BAGHOUSE COMP COAL BITUMINOUS 0.0482 BITUMINOUS/ SUBBITUMINOUS 167 Jim Bridger BW 74 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS WETSCRUB SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0501 SUBBITUMINOUS 50 Laramie River Station 1 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS WETSCRUB SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0521 SUBBITUMINOUS 77 Laramie River Station 3 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS SDA SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0521 SUBBITUMINOUS 74 La Cygne 1 CYCLONE/ NOX/ WET PARTSCRUB WETSCRUB SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0523 SUBBITUMINOUS 300 Cliffside 1 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ DRY ESP HS NONE BITUMINOUS 0.0523 BITUMINOUS 1400 Sherburne County Generating Plant # 3 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY BAGHOUSE SDA SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0528 SUBBITUMINOUS 102 Meramec 4 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS NONE SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0539 SUBBITUMINOUS/ BITUMINOUS 3620 Colstrip 3 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY PARTSCRUB WETSCRUB SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0555 SUBBITUMINOUS 67 GRDA 2 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS SDA SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0557 SUBBITUMINOUS/ BITUMINOUS 399 Coronado U1B CONV/ PC/ NOX/ WET ESP HS WETSCRUB SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0569 SUBBITUMINOUS 117 Newton 2 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS COMP COAL BITUMINOUS 0.0570 SUBBITUMINOUS 178 Salem Harbor 3 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ SNCR/ DRY ESP CS COMP COAL BITUMINOUS 0.0571 BITUMINOUS 100 Columbia 1 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP HS COMP COAL SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0575 SUBBITUMINOUS 314 Cholla 3 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ DRY ESP HS NONE SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0582 SUBBITUMINOUS 50 Cholla 2 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ DRY MECH/ PARTSCRUB WETSCRUB SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0582 SUBBITUMINOUS 50 Platte 1 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ WET ESP HS COMP COAL SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0608 SUBBITUMINOUS 181 Wyodak BW 91 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS SDA SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0633 SUBBITUMINOUS 25 Brayton Point 1 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS COMP COAL BITUMINOUS 0.0654 BITUMINOUS 567 Brayton Point 3 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS COMP COAL BITUMINOUS 0.0654 BITUMINOUS 967 Antelope Valley Station B1 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY BAGHOUSE SDA LIGNITE 0.0658 LIGNITE 107 Lawrence 4 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ DRY PARTSCRUB WETSCRUB SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0683 SUBBITUMINOUS 267 Clay Boswell 2 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY BAGHOUSE COMP COAL SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0701 SUBBITUMINOUS 50 Clay Boswell 3 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY PARTSCRUB WETSCRUB/ COMP COAL SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0701 SUBBITUMINOUS 50 Clay Boswell 4 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY PARTSCRUB WETSCRUB SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0701 SUBBITUMINOUS 50 Clifty Creek 6 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ WET ESP HS COMP COAL SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0711 SUBBITUMINOUS/ BITUMINOUS 441 Leland Olds Station 2 CYCLONE/ NONOX/ WET ESP CS NONE LIGNITE 0.0717 LIGNITE 91 Dwayne Collier Battle Cogeneration Facility 2B STOKER/ NOX/ DRY BAGHOUSE SDA BITUMINOUS 0.0767 BITUMINOUS 1700 Comanche 2 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY BAGHOUSE COMP COAL SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0767 SUBBITUMINOUS 50 Gibson Generating Station ( 0300) 3 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS NONE BITUMINOUS 0.0772 BITUMINOUS 1867 Gibson Generating Station ( 1099) 3 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS NONE BITUMINOUS 0.0772 BITUMINOUS 2100 Wabash River Generating Station 1 + 1A COAL GAS COAL GAS COAL GAS BITUMINOUS 0.0786 BITUMINOUS 600 George Neal South 4 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS COMP COAL SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0800 SUBBITUMINOUS 191 Nelson Dewey 1 CYCLONE/ NONOX/ WET ESP HS COMP COAL SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0805 SUBBITUMINOUS/ PETCOKE 129 Widows Creek Fossil Plant 6 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ DRY ESP CS COMP COAL BITUMINOUS 0.0846 BITUMINOUS 333 Sam Seymour 3 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ DRY ESP CS WETSCRUB SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0852 SUBBITUMINOUS 20 Polk Power 1 COAL GAS COAL GAS COAL GAS BITUMINOUS 0.0858 BITUMINOUS 1067 R. M. Heskett Station B2 FBC/ NONOX ESP CS FBC LIGNITE 0.0881 LIGNITE 100 Appendix C 7. Mercury and Chlorine Fuel Data From Utility Boilersa Plant name Unit name Boiler/ NOx type PM control SOx control name of fuel 1 average Hg in fuel ( ppmw) Name of Fuel 2 Cl in test coal ( ppm)

Stanton Station 1 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS NONE LIGNITE 0.0883 LIGNITE 50 Stanton Station 10 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY BAGHOUSE SDA LIGNITE 0.0883 LIGNITE 28 Charles R. Lowman 2 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ DRY ESP HS WETSCRUB BITUMINOUS 0.0900 BITUMINOUS 367 Dunkirk 2 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP HS COMP COAL BITUMINOUS 0.0902 BITUMINOUS 872 Jack Watson 4 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS NONE BITUMINOUS 0.0918 BITUMINOUS 761 San Juan 2 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ DRY ESP HS WETSCRUB SUBBITUMINOUS 0.0918 SUBBITUMINOUS 167 Mecklenburg Cogeneration Facility GEN 1 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY BAGHOUSE SDA BITUMINOUS 0.0932 BITUMINOUS 1893 Port Washington 4 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ DRY ESP CS SORBENT INJ BITUMINOUS 0.0954 BITUMINOUS 1215 Lewis & Clark B1 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY PARTSCRUB NONE LIGNITE 0.0967 LIGNITE 100 Clover Power Station 2 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY BAGHOUSE WETSCRUB BITUMINOUS 0.0978 BITUMINOUS 520 W. H. Sammis 1 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ DRY BAGHOUSE NONE BITUMINOUS 0.1009 BITUMINOUS 1233 Big Brown 1 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ DRY ESP CS/ BAGHOUSE NONE LIGNITE 0.1319 LIGNITE 133 Gaston 1 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP HS NONE BITUMINOUS 0.1342 BITUMINOUS 333 Coyote 1 CYCLONE/ NONOX/ WET BAGHOUSE SDA LIGNITE 0.1348 LIGNITE 100 Limestone LIM1 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ WET ESP CS WETSCRUB LIGNITE 0.1460 LIGNITE 50 SEI  Birchwood Power Facility 1 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ SCR/ DRY BAGHOUSE SDA BITUMINOUS 0.1470 BITUMINOUS 917 Logan Generating Plant GEN 1 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ SCR/ DRY BAGHOUSE SDA BITUMINOUS 0.1727 BITUMINOUS 1500 Kline Township Cogen Facility GEN1 FBC/ NONOX BAGHOUSE FBC WASTE ANTHRACITE 0.1733 WASTE BITUMINOUS 267 Monticello 1 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ DRY ESP CS/ BAGHOUSE NONE LIGNITE 0.1754 LIGNITE 167 Monticello 3 CONV/ PC/ NONOX/ DRY ESP CS WETSCRUB LIGNITE 0.1754 LIGNITE 133 R. D. Morrow Sr. Generating plant 2 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP HS WETSCRUB BITUMINOUS 0.1958 BITUMINOUS 833 AES Cayuga ( NY) ( formerly NYSEG Milliken) 2 CONV/ PC/ NOX/ DRY ESP CS WETSCRUB BITUMINOUS 0.3186 BITUMINOUS 882 Scrubgrass Generating Company L. P. GEN1 FBC/ NONOX BAGHOUSE FBC WASTE BITUMINOUSb 0.7029 WASTE BITUMINOUS 600 a From Working Group distribution materials on EPA website for the Utility MACT: " www. epa. gov/ ttn/ atw/ combust/ utiltox/ utoxpg. html# DA2". January 2002.

b Information for the fuel was not used in the mercury analyses because it was not considered to be representative of coal burned in industrial boilers. Mercury Cl High 0.3186 3620 Low 0.0254 20 High/ Low 12.5433 181 Appendix C 8. Total Selected Metals MACT Floor Emission Level Analysis for Solid Fuel Subcategories ( without Manganese)

ID Material Control Level Total Selected Metals EF ( lb/ MMMBtu)  Sorted from Highest to Lowest Corresponding PM EF ( lb/ MMBtu) E232.001c Coal ESP 3.965E 04 2.320E 02 E208a. 001c Coal ESP 3.124E 04 2.030E 01 E208b. 001c Coal ESP 2.898E 04 1.120E 01 E204.005c Coal ESP 2.597E 04 9.230E 02 E232.002c Coal ESP 2.250E 04 1.310E 02 E204.004c Coal ESP 2.130E 04 1.940E 08 E209b. 002c Coal ESP 2.095E 04 3.860E 02 E735.019 Coal ESP 1.633E 04 8.180E 02 E236.001c Coal ESP 1.478E 04 1.870E 02 E202.001c1 Coal ESP 1.284E 04 1.080E 01 E692.003 Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 1.097E 04 1.440E 02 E209a. 002c Coal ESP 1.041E 04 1.960E 02 E200.001C Coal ESP 1.015E 04 2.010E 02 E692.001 Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 8.898E 05 1.380E 02 E735.022 Coal ESP 8.512E 05 3.330E 02 E735.015 Coal ESP 7.707E 05 1.220E 01 E206.001c2 Coal Fabric Filter 7.262E 05 NA E692.002 Coal/ Wood/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 7.189E 05 1.080E 02 E740.003 Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid ESP 7.102E 05 1.130E 01 E206.001c1 Coal Fabric Filter 6.169E 05 2.480E 03 E229.002c1 Coal ESP 6.168E 05 8.240E 02 E740.001 Wood ESP 5.616E 05 6.750E 02 E203.001c Coal Fabric Filter 5.562E 05 7.380E 03 E775 NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid or Gas/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter 5.562E 05 NA E202.001c2 Coal ESP/ Flue Gas Desulfurization 4.851E 05 1.110E 02 E239.001c Coal Fabric Filter/ Spray Dryer 3.599E 05 NA E222.002cdup Coal ESP/ SD 3.001E 05 1.210E 02 E229.002c2 Coal ESP/ Flue Gas Desulfurization 2.502E 05 1.000E 02 E206.001c3 Coal Fabric Filter 2.459E 05 2.810E 02 E221.001c1 Coal ESP 2.338E 05 8.000E 02 E738.002 Wood Fabric Filter 2.036E 05 2.740E 02 E1 Coal Fabric Filter 2.028E 05 NA E222.002c Coal ESP/ SD 1.943E 05 7.950E 03 E221.001c2 Coal ESP/ Flue Gas Desulfurization 1.837E 05 3.920E 02 E27 2 Wood Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 1.762E 05 NA E27 Wood/ Other Biomass/ NFF Liquid/ NFF Solid Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 1.562E 05 NA E230.001c Coal ESP 1.543E 05 2.380E 02 E739.001 Wood Fabric Filter 1.538E 05 1.460E 02 E268.002 Wood ESP 1.089E 05 2.240E 03 E231.001u Coal Fabric Filter 9.038E 06 NA E224.016 Coal Fabric Filter 8.017E 06 1.660E 03 E231.001c Coal Fabric Filter/ Flue Gas Desulfurization 6.559E 06 NA E20 Coal Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 4.222E 06 NA E1021 Coal Fabric Filter 3.757E 06 NA E404.001 Wood ESP 3.084E 06 1.440E 03 E523.003 Wood ESP 3.084E 06 1.000E 02 E15 Coal Fabric Filter/ Limestone Injection ( DSI) 2.544E 06 NA E224.022 Coal Fabric Filter 2.496E 06 1.200E 03 E11 Coal ESP/ Venturi Scrubber 2.396E 06 1.440E 03 E218.003 Coal ESP 1.676E 06 1.320E 03 dwcgi 7150 1077823285 571006000. xls 24 11/ 20/ 03 Appendix D 1. PM Emission Information for Liquid Fuel Fired Boilersa Test ID Pollutant Fuel Type Control Level Avg Emission Factor ( lb/ MMBtu) Efficiency for ESP Controlled Units (%)

B103.001 PM Residual Liquid FF Wet Scrubber 0.0234 B104.001 PM Residual Liquid FF No Control 0.414 B104.002 PM Residual Liquid FF No Control 0.113 B105.001 PM Distillate Liquid FF No Control 0.0513 B106.001 PM Residual Liquid FF No Control 0.047 B109.001 PM Residual Liquid FF No Control 0.174 B110.001 PM Distillate Liquid FF No Control 0.00179 B110.002 PM Distillate Liquid FF No Control 0.001186 B111.001 PM Distillate Liquid FF No Control 0.0146 B113.001 PM Residual Liquid FF No Control 0.114 B114.001 PM Residual Liquid FF No Control 0.0825 B115.001 PM Residual Liquid FF No Control 0.138 B116.001 PM Residual Liquid FF No Control 0.145 B117.001 PM Residual Liquid FF No Control 0.0983 B118.001 PM Residual Liquid FF No Control 0.0496 E212.001c PM Residual Liquid FF ESP 0.0678 3 E212.001u PM Residual Liquid FF No Control 0.07 E215.007 PM Residual Liquid FF Cyclone/ Carbon Injection 0.0386 E242.001 PM Residual Liquid FF Flue Gas Recirculation 0.0384 E242.005 PM Residual Liquid FF Flue Gas Recirculation 0.0000486 E243.003c PM Residual Liquid FF ESP 0.0152 77 E243.003u PM Residual Liquid FF No Control 0.0665 E251a. 003c PM Residual Liquid FF No Control 0.128 E251a. 003u PM Residual Liquid FF No Control 0.0811 E251b. 001u PM Residual Liquid FF Flue Gas Recirculation 0.0439 E251b. 005c PM Residual Liquid FF ESP/ Flue Gas Recirculation 0.00352 92 E251b. 005u PM Residual Liquid FF Flue Gas Recirculation 0.044 E623.003 PM Residual Liquid FF No Control 0.0958 a Working Group distribution materials on EPA website for the Utility MACT: " www. epa. gov/ ttn/ atw/ combust/ utiltox/ utoxpg. html# DA2". January 2002. Appendix D 2. Summary of Chlorine Fuel Analysis Data for Residual and Distillate Fuel Oilsa FACILITY NAME CITY STATE Material Compound Name Content Non Detect Units Long Beach Generating Station Long Beach CA Distillate Fuel Oil Chlorine 30 ND mg/ L Humbolt Bay Power Plant Humbolt Bay CA Residual Fuel Oil Chlorine 90 mg/ L Morro Bay Power Plant Morro Bay CA Residual Fuel Oil Chlorine 130 mg/ L EPRI Site 103 CA Residual Fuel Oil Chlorine 130 mg/ L El Segundo Generating Station El Segundo CA Residual Fuel Oil Chlorine 131 mg/ L Alamitos Generating Station Alamitos CA Residual Fuel Oil Chlorine 150 mg/ L Huntington Beach Generating Station Huntington Beach CA Residual Fuel Oil Chlorine 160 mg/ L a Data are from fuel analyses database gathered during the ICCR. Database is included in the docket as item II D 2 on CD ROM.

dwcgi 7150 1077823285 571006000. xls 26 1/ 14/ 00


Jan King/ RTP/ USEPA/ US 03/ 15/ 2006 12: 34 PM To aflynn@ omb. eop. gov cc Subject Revisions for DE/ NJ CAIR Amy attached are redline/ strikeout changes made in response to your comments.

Jan King 919/ 541 5665


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 202 (Friday, October 22, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58597-58600]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22785]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 202 / Friday, October 22, 2021 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0883; Project Identifier AD-2021-00307-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2020-16-01, which applies to all Airbus SAS Model A318, A319, A320, and
A321 series airplanes. AD 2020-16-01 requires repetitive cleaning and
greasing of affected cargo door seals (both original equipment
manufacturer (OEM) and parts manufacturer approval (PMA) parts). Since
the FAA issued AD 2020-16-01, the FAA determined that improved cargo
door seals must be installed to address the unsafe condition, and that
certain flight operations must be limited until the improved cargo door
seals are installed. In addition, the FAA has issued a new AD to
address the OEM parts. This proposed AD would limit the applicability
to airplanes that have certain PMA parts installed. This proposed AD
would retain certain actions required by AD 2020-16-01 and require
replacing certain forward and aft cargo compartment door seals with new
seals and installing a placard on the cargo compartment doors; and for
certain airplanes, implementing an operational limitation for certain
routes. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 6,
2021.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For Airbus service information identified in this NPRM, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine No:
2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; internet https://www.airbus.com. For EASA material identified in this NPRM, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email [email protected]; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You
may find this material on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0883; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations is listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Marshall, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Atlanta ACO Branch, 1701 Columbia Avenue,
College Park, GA 30337; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2021-0883; Project Identifier
AD-2021-00307-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to John
Marshall, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Atlanta ACO
Branch, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; phone: 404-474-
5524; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected]. Any commentary
that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will
be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    The FAA issued AD 2020-16-01, Amendment 39-21185 (85 FR 47013,
August 4, 2020) (AD 2020-16-01), for all Airbus SAS Model A318, A319,
A320, and A321 series airplanes. AD

2020-16-01 was prompted by reports of low halon concentration in the
forward and aft cargo compartments due to air leakage through cargo
door seals. AD 2020-16-01 requires repetitive cleaning and greasing of
forward and aft cargo door seals having part number (P/N)
D5237106020000, D5237106020200, D5237106020400, D5237300120000, or
D5237300120200 (OEM parts); bulk cargo door seals having P/N
D5237200220000 or D5237200220200 (OEM parts); and forward and aft cargo
door seals P/N D5237106020400S, approved under PMA PQ1715CE (PMA part).
The agency issued AD 2020-16-01 to address low halon concentration,
which, if not addressed, could affect the fire extinguishing system
efficiency in the cargo compartments and possibly result in failure of
the system to contain a cargo compartment fire.
    The FAA has also issued AD 2021-18-04, Amendment 39-21705 (86 FR
51265, September 15, 2021) (AD 2021-18-04), which applies to all Airbus
SAS Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes and addresses the
OEM parts. That AD requires repetitive cleaning and greasing of
affected OEM cargo door seals; replacing certain forward, aft, and bulk
cargo compartment door seals with new seals and installing a placard on
the cargo compartment doors; and for certain airplanes, implementing an
operational limitation for certain routes. Paragraph (h)(2) of AD 2021-
18-04 explains conditions under which operators will no longer need to
show compliance with certain requirements of AD 2020-16-01 for affected
OEM parts. AD 2021-18-04 also states that the FAA is considering
additional rulemaking to require replacement of PMA cargo door seals
approved for the type design forward and aft cargo compartment door
seal P/N D5237106020400, including but not limited to PMA P/N
D5237106020400S.
    The FAA has determined additional rulemaking is necessary to
require replacement of PMA P/N D5237106020400S with improved cargo door
seals and to limit certain flight operations until the improved cargo
door seals are installed. This NPRM addresses the identified unsafe
condition for PMA forward and aft cargo door seals approved for the
type design forward and aft cargo compartment door seal P/N
D5237106020400, including but not limited to PMA P/N D5237106020400S.

FAA's Determination

    The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that the unsafe
condition described previously is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-1195, Revision 01,
dated December 15, 2020, and Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-1196,
dated October 12, 2020. This service information specifies procedures
for replacing the forward and aft cargo compartment door seals with new
seals, among other actions, and installing a placard on the cargo
compartment doors. These documents are distinct since they apply to
different airplane models.
    This proposed AD also requires European Union Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD 2021-0049, dated February 18, 2021, which the Director
of the Federal Register approved for incorporation by reference as of
October 20, 2021 (86 FR 51265, September 15, 2021).
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in ADDRESSES.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would continue to require repetitive cleaning and
greasing, and would require replacing certain PMA forward and aft cargo
compartment door seals with new seals and installing a placard on the
cargo compartment doors; and for certain airplanes, implementing an
operational limitation for certain routes.

Explanation of Service Information

    Although the service information described previously specifies
replacing OEM parts, PMA parts are similar in design to the OEM parts;
therefore the service information may be used for airplanes on which
the PMA parts are installed. However, if the service information cannot
be used, operators may request an alternative method of compliance in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (m) of this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 1,768 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the
following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                  Labor cost           Parts cost         Cost per product      operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cleaning and greasing (retained  1 work-hour x $85  $0....................  $85, per cleaning/ $150,280, per
 actions from AD 2020-16-01).     per hour = $85,                            greasing cycle.    cleaning/
                                  per cleaning/                                                 greasing cycle.
                                  greasing cycle.
Cargo door seal replacement and  8 work-hours x     Up to $5,680..........  Up to $6,360.....  Up to
 placard installation (new        $85 per hour =                                                $11,244,480.
 proposed action).                $680.
Operational limitation           1 work-hour x $85  $0....................  $85..............  Up to $150,280
 implementation (e.g., revising   per hour = $85.                                               (Group 3
 the airplane flight manual)                                                                    airplanes only).
 (new proposed action).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2020-16-01, Amendment 39-21185
(85 FR 47013, August 4, 2020), and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:

Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA-2021-0883; Project Identifier AD-2021-
00307-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by December 6, 2021.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2020-16-01, Amendment 39-21185 (85 FR 47013,
August 4, 2020) (AD 2020-16-01).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Airbus SAS airplanes identified in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this AD, certificated in any
category, equipped with any parts manufacturer approval (PMA) part
approved for the type design forward and aft cargo compartment door
seal part number (P/N) D5237106020400, including but not limited to
PMA P/N D5237106020400S.
    (1) Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes.
    (2) Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, -133, -
151N, -153N, and -171N airplanes.
    (3) Model A320-211, -212, -214, -215, -216, -231, -232, -233, -
251N, -252N, -253N, -271N, -272N, and -273N airplanes.
    (4) Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, -232, -
251N, -251NX, -252N, -252NX, -253N, -253NX, -271N, -271NX, -272N,
and -272NX airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 26, Fire
protection; 52, Doors.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of low halon concentration in
the forward and aft cargo compartments due to air leakage through
cargo compartment door seals, and the certification of improved
cargo compartment door seals. The FAA is issuing this AD to address
low halon concentration. This condition, if not corrected, could
affect the fire extinguishing system efficiency in the cargo
compartments, possibly resulting in failure of the system to contain
a cargo compartment fire.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Definition

    For the purposes of this AD, a ``PMA part'' is defined as any
PMA part approved for the type design forward and aft cargo
compartment door seal P/N D5237106020400, including but not limited
to PMA P/N D5237106020400S.

(h) Retained Cleaning and Greasing, With Revised Compliance Language

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2020-16-01, with revised compliance language. Within 6 months after
the airplane date of manufacture, or 3 months after August 19, 2020
(the effective date of AD 2020-16-01), whichever occurs later, and,
thereafter, at intervals not exceeding 6 months, clean and grease
each PMA part, in accordance with the instructions specified in
paragraph (1) or (2) of European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
AD 2021-0049, dated February 18, 2021. Accomplishing the actions
required by paragraph (i) of this AD on an airplane terminates the
actions required by this paragraph for that airplane only, and for
the specific cargo door locations with PMA parts only.

(i) Modification

    Within 96 months after the effective date of this AD, replace
the seals of the PMA part with new seals and install a placard on
the cargo compartment doors, in accordance with the method specified
in paragraph (i)(1) or (2) of this AD. Accomplishing the actions
required by this paragraph terminates the actions required by
paragraph (h) of this AD for that airplane only, and for the
specific cargo door locations where PMA parts were replaced only.
    (1) Do the actions in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-1195, Revision 01,
dated December 15, 2020, or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-1196,
dated October 12, 2020, as applicable, except where the procedures
refer to P/N D5237106020400, those procedures must be used for the
PMA part.
    (2) Do the actions in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (m)(1) of this AD.

(j) Operational Limitation

    For Model A319 airplanes on which Airbus mod 26402, mod 34881 or
mod 34882 has been embodied in production, or Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-26-1066 or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-26-1076 has
been embodied in service: As of 9 months after the effective date of
this AD, or upon the accumulation of 1,600 flight hours by the
airplane after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, do not operate an airplane over a route having a point with a
diversion time of more than 60 minutes, unless that airplane has
been modified as required by paragraph (i) of this AD. Amending the
existing aircraft flight manual (AFM) of the airplane by inserting a
copy of this AD, and restricting operations to routes having
diversion times of 60 minutes or less, is an acceptable method to
comply with the operational limitation requirement for that
airplane. After modification of an airplane as required by this
paragraph (i) of this AD, this limitation is no longer required and
can be removed from the AFM of that airplane.

(k) Credit for Previous Actions

    (1) This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Airbus Technical Adaption 80774334/
003/2020, Issue 1, dated April 1, 2020.
    (2) This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using EASA AD 2020-0133, dated June 10,
2020.
    (3) This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-
1195, dated October 12, 2020.

(l) Parts Installation Prohibition

    Do not install a PMA part, or a door equipped with a PMA part,
on any airplane, as required by paragraph (l)(1) or (2) of this AD,
as applicable.
    (1) For airplanes with a PMA part installed as of the effective
date of this AD: After modification of the airplane as required by
paragraph (i) of this AD.
    (2) For airplanes that do not have a PMA part installed as of
the effective date of this AD: As of the effective date of this AD.

(m) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with

14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or
responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the certification office,
send it to the attention of the person identified in Related
Information.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (3) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Atlanta ACO
Branch, FAA.
    (4) Required for compliance (RC): Except as specified by
paragraph (m)(3) of this AD, if any service information contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and
tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests
that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the
airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC
require approval of an AMOC.

(n) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact John Marshall,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Atlanta ACO Branch, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:
404-474-5606; email: [email protected].
    (2) For Airbus service information identified in this AD,
contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, Rond-Point Emile
Dewoitine No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93
36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email [email protected];
internet https://www.airbus.com. For EASA material identified in
this AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email [email protected];
internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this material on the EASA
website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this referenced
service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.

    Issued on October 14, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-22785 Filed 10-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 95 (Friday, May 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28593-28594]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11349]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2014-0010]

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), this document provides the public notice that by a document
dated January 9, 2014, Wabtec Railway Electronics (Wabtec) has
petitioned the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for a waiver of
compliance from certain provisions of the Federal railroad safety
regulations contained at Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
Part 229, Railroad Locomotive Safety Standards, and 49 CFR Part 232,
Brake System Safety Standards for Freight and Other Non-Passenger
Trains and Equipment; End of Train Devices. FRA assigned the petition
Docket Number FRA-2014-0010.
    Specifically, Wabtec seeks relief from 49 CFR 229.29, Air brake
system calibration, maintenance, and testing, and 49 CFR 232.205, Class
I brake test-initial terminal inspection. These sections list the
required periods for the calibration of the air flow method (AFM)
indicator and the process to be used to calibrate the AFM. The present
requirement is for AFM calibration to occur at intervals not to exceed
92 days. Wabtec, in conjunction with Union Pacific Railroad (UP),
requests a 2-year test waiver period to monitor and analyze AFM
readings taken after the requested 368-day test interval for all UP
locomotives equipped with Wabtec EPIC 3102D2, EPIC II, and FastBrake
electronic air brake systems. On April 9, 2012, FRA modified 49 CFR
229.27, Annual tests, to allow that ``[a]ll testing under this section
shall be performed at intervals that do not exceed 368 calendar days''
and ``[e]ach device used by the engineer to aid in the control or
braking of the train or locomotive that provides an indication or air
pressure electronically shall be tested by comparison with a test gauge
or self-test designed for this purpose.'' Wabtec seeks to gather and
compare this data with the 92-day readings it has previously collected
to confirm that proper AFM calibration can be maintained over a 368-day
time period. Positive conclusions realized from the test may then be
used to extend the waiver beyond the initial 2-year period, or as the
basis for future regulatory review of the 92-day requirement to match
the requirements of 49 CFR 229.27.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations
Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
    Communications received by June 30, 2014 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments received after that date will be
considered as far as practicable.
    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the document,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
See http://www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice for the privacy notice
of regulations.gov or interested parties may review DOT's complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 12, 2014.
Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-11349 Filed 5-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 15, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34890]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14835]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

49 CFR Part 213

[Docket No. FRA-2009-0007, Notice No. 3]
RIN 2130-AC01

Track Safety Standards; Concrete Crossties

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document delays the effectiveness of the final rule,
which mandates specific requirements for effective concrete crossties,
for rail fastening systems connected to concrete crossties, and for
automated inspections of track constructed with concrete crossties. The
Track Safety Standards were amended via final rule on April 1, 2011,
and the final rule was scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2011. FRA
received two petitions for reconsideration in response to the final
rule that contain substantive issues requiring a detailed response.
Accordingly, in order to fully respond to the petitions for
reconsideration, this document delays the effective date of the final
rule until October 1, 2011.

DATES: The effective date for the final rule published April 1, 2011,
at 76 FR 18073, effective July 1, 2011, is delayed until October 1,
2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Rusk, Staff Director, Office
of Railroad Safety, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590 (telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>); or Veronica Chittim, Trial Attorney,
Office of Chief Counsel, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20950 (telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 1, 2011, FRA published a final rule
mandating specific requirements for effective concrete crossties, for
rail fastening systems connected to concrete crossties, and for
automated inspections of track constructed with concrete crossties. See
76 FR 18073. The effective date of this final rule was to be July 1,
2011. FRA received two petitions for reconsideration in response to the
final rule that contain substantive issues requiring a detailed
response from FRA. Accordingly, in order to allow FRA appropriate time
to consider and fully respond to the petitions for reconsideration,
this document delays the effective date of the final rule until October
1, 2011. Therefore, any requirements imposed by the final rule need not
be complied with until October 1, 2011.

List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 213

    Penalties, Railroad safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

The Final Rule

    In consideration of the foregoing, FRA delays the effective date of
the final rule until October 1, 2011.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 9, 2011.
Joseph C. Szabo,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-14835 Filed 6-10-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P