[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5996]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02075]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP14-517-000; CP14-518-000; PF13-14-000]

Golden Pass Products, LLC; Golden Pass Pipeline, LLC; Revised
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review of the Golden Pass
Liquefied Natural Gas Export Project

    This notice identifies the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission or FERC) staff's revised schedule for the completion of the
final environmental impact statement (EIS) for Golden Pass Products,
LLC and Golden Pass Pipeline, LLC's Golden Pass Liquefied Natural Gas
Export Project. The previous notice of schedule, issued on June 26,
2015, identified March 4, 2016 as the issuance date.

Schedule for Environmental Review

Issuance of Notice of Availability of the final EIS July 29, 2016
90-day Federal Authorization Decision Deadline October 27, 2016

    If a schedule change becomes necessary, additional notice will be
provided so that the relevant agencies are kept informed of the
Project's progress.

Additional Information

    In order to receive notification of the issuance of the final EIS
and to keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in specific
dockets, the Commission offers a free service called eSubscription. Go
to www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.

    Dated: January 29, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02075 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Dear Mr. Zeller:

I am writing as an individual consumer to request an extension of the comment period for the Food and Drug Administration's ("FDA") Proposed Rule Deeming Tobacco Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking and Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the "Proposed Rule") published at 79 Fed. Reg. 23,142 and Federal Register No. 2014-09491. On behalf of myself, I am requesting that the comment period for the Proposed Rule be extended by the FDA for an additional 105 days, from its current 75-day period, to 180 days.

The Proposed Rule raises a number of significant issues and questions that are important and relevant to me, as a consumer of products that are proposed for regulation under the Proposed Rule. The Proposed Rule asks about a hundred different questions I might want to respond to. I want to provide my thoughts and comments on many of these issues, but my time to devote to researching and providing thoughtful comments on these important questions is limited. I have already spent many hours researching and dissecting these issues, but they take time. I know that the FDA took many years to even come up with the Proposed Rule, so I do not think it is at all unreasonable to allow the public a mere six months to comment on it. This is our only opportunity, as consumers, to provide our feedback. I would also like to not that there is a considerable amount of science on this subject that has gone completely ignored apparently by the FDA and our elected officials done by Dr. Konstantinos Farsalinos. I urge you to consult with this person.

I feel very strongly about e-cigarettes as an alternative to combustible cigarettes. Quite simply, I firmly believe that they saved my life. I wish to provide you with my personal story. Over 3 1/2 years ago as a 22 year smoker, I had a heart attack. 99% blocked in one artery and 80% in another. You would think having a heart attack would make you stop smoking immediately. Not the case. Not until I discovered electronic cigarettes. I quit the very first day I bought one and have not looked back. I also shared this with my cardiologist and he is thrilled I am no longer smoking. I can breathe better, taste better, and my energy level is way up. Electronic cigertettes are at least 90 to 99% better than the combustable counterparts. I also watched my father, a 3 pack a day smoker die at 47. I watched my stepfather struggle through two open heart surgeries and later emphysema. And in this past December, my mother passed away in house fire she started with a cigarette. This all could have been avoided if electronic cigarettes, one of the greatest inventions ever for public health, had been invented years ago.

I realize that the FDA has the authority under 21 CFR 10.40 to extend this time frame and that the FDA has exercised this authority on numerous occasions in the past. I would therefore ask that you do so here, so that all stakeholders have the opportunity to provide their comments on this proposed regulation. I also urge you to do what is right for people. Not to pander to politicians, Big Tobacco and the pharmaceutical companyies whose market share is dwindling and rightfully so.

I appreciate your consideration of my request.


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55790-55791]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22095]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CD14-25-000]

City of Berlin, New Hampshire; Notice of Preliminary
Determination of a Qualifying Conduit Hydropower Facility and
Soliciting Comments and Motions To Intervene

    On August 28, 2014, the City of Berlin, New Hampshire filed a
notice of intent to construct a qualifying conduit hydropower facility,
pursuant to section 30 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), as amended by
section 4 of the Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 (HREA).
The proposed Ammonoosuc Water Treatment Plant Hydroelectric Project
would have an installed capacity of 21 kilowatts (kW) and would be
located on the existing 16-inch-diameter raw water transmission main
immediately upstream from the pressure-reducing valve for a water
treatment plant. The project would be located near the City of Berlin
in Coos County, New Hampshire.
    Applicant Contact: Roland L. Viens, Superintendent, City of Berlin,
New Hampshire, City Hall, 168 Main Street, Berlin, NH 03570, Phone No.
(603) 752-1677.
    FERC Contact: Robert Bell, Phone No.<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Qualifying Conduit Hydropower Facility Description: The proposed
project would consist of: (1) One proposed inline integrated turbine/
generator with an installed capacity of 21 kW; (2) a proposed concrete
powerhouse; and (3) appurtenant facilities. The proposed project would
have an estimated annual generating capacity of 85 megawatt-hours.
    A qualifying conduit hydropower facility is one that is determined
or deemed to meet all of the criteria shown in the table below.

                          Table 1--Criteria for Qualifying Conduit Hydropower Facility
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Statutory provision                                 Description                         Satisfies (Y/N)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FPA 30(a)(3)(A), as amended by HREA.  The conduit the facility uses is a tunnel, canal,                       Y
                                       pipeline, aqueduct, flume, ditch, or similar manmade
                                       water conveyance that is operated for the distribution
                                       of water for agricultural, municipal, or industrial
                                       consumption and not primarily for the generation of
                                       electricity.
FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(i), as amended by     The facility is constructed, operated, or maintained for                Y
 HREA.                                 the generation of electric power and uses for such
                                       generation only the hydroelectric potential of a non-
                                       federally owned conduit.
FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(ii), as amended by    The facility has an installed capacity that does not                    Y
 HREA.                                 exceed 5 megawatts.
FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(iii), as amended by   On or before August 9, 2013, the facility is not                        Y
 HREA.                                 licensed, or exempted from the licensing requirements of
                                       Part I of the FPA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Preliminary Determination: Based upon the above criteria,
Commission staff preliminarily determines that the proposal satisfies
the requirements for a qualifying conduit hydropower facility, which is
not required to be licensed or exempted from licensing.
    Comments and Motions to Intervene: Deadline for filing comments
contesting whether the facility meets the qualifying criteria is 45
days from the issuance date of this notice.
    Deadline for filing motions to intervene is 30 days from the
issuance date of this notice.
    Anyone may submit comments or a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR
385.210 and 385.214. Any motions to intervene must be received on or
before the specified deadline date for the particular proceeding.
    Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: All filings must (1)
bear in all capital letters the ``COMMENTS CONTESTING QUALIFICATION FOR
A CONDUIT HYDROPOWER FACILITY'' or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE,'' as
applicable; (2) state in the heading the name of the applicant and the
project number of the application to which the filing responds; (3)
state the name, address, and telephone number of the person filing; and
(4) otherwise comply with the requirements of sections 385.2001 through
385.2005 of the Commission's regulations.\1\ All comments contesting
Commission staff's preliminary determination that the facility meets
the qualifying criteria must set forth their evidentiary basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 385.2001-2005 (2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
motions to intervene and comments using the Commission's eFiling system
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration,
using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the
end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or
(202) 502-8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper
copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. A copy of all other filings in
reference to this application must be accompanied by proof of service
on all persons listed in the service list prepared by the Commission in
this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.
    Locations of Notice of Intent: Copies of the notice of intent can
be obtained directly from the applicant or such copies can be viewed
and reproduced at the Commission in its Public Reference Room, Room 2A,
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. The filing may also be
viewed on the web at http://

www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp using the ``eLibrary'' link.
Enter the docket number (e.g., CD14-25-000) in the docket number field
to access the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3676
or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 10, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-22095 Filed 9-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: July 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 131)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 39472-39475]
[DOCID:fr09jy10-8]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0691; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-027-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Eclipse Aerospace, Inc. Model EA500
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Eclipse Aerospace, Inc. (Eclipse) Model EA500 airplanes. This
proposed AD would require incorporating changes to the electronic
flight information system and the airplane flight manuals. This
proposed AD results from reports of uncommanded changes to the
communications radio frequency, altitude preselect, and/or transponder
codes. We are proposing this AD to correct faulty integration of
hardware and software, which could result in unannunciated, uncommanded
changes in communications radio frequency, transponder codes, and
altitude preselect settings. These uncommanded changes could result in
loss of communication with air traffic control due to improper
communications frequency, autopilot level off at the incorrect
altitude, or air traffic control loss of proper tracking of the
aircraft.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 23, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.

     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Eclipse Aerospace, Incorporated, 2503 Clark Carr Loop, SE.,
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Kinney, Aerospace Engineer, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:
(817) 222-5960.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number, ``FAA-
2010-0691; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-027-AD'' at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall
regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed
AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may
amend the proposed AD in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive concerning this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We have received reports of uncommanded changes in communications
radio frequency, transponder codes, and altitude preselect settings on
Eclipse EA500 airplanes. The majority of reports consisted of
uncommanded transponder code changes, instances of uncommanded altitude
preselect changes have also been noted. The uncommanded radio
frequencies settings have only been reported during flight test. Root
cause was determined to be a software communication integration issue
between the EFIS display interface and associated hardware.
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in uncommanded
changes in communications radio frequency, transponder codes, and
altitude preselect settings. These uncommanded changes could result in
loss of communication with air traffic control due to improper
communications frequency, autopilot level off at the incorrect
altitude, or air traffic control loss of proper tracking of the
aircraft.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed Eclipse Aviation Required Service Bulletin SB 500-
31-015, REV D, dated January 14, 2009; and Eclipse Aviation Recommended
Service Bulletin SB 500-99-005, REV A, dated February 16, 2009.
    The service information describes procedures for incorporating
changes to the electronic flight information system by the following
means:
     the electronic flight instrument system 1.3 software
update; and
     the avionics upgrade to AVIO NG + 1.5 configuration.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all information and
determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist
or develop on other products of the same type design. This proposed AD
would require you to incorporate changes to the electronic flight
information system and the airplane flight manuals.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 168 airplanes in the
U.S. registry.
    Owners/operators would comply with this proposed AD action by doing
either of the following update options. We have no way of knowing the
number of airplanes that would receive each of these upgrades.
    We estimate the following costs to do the proposed electronic
flight instrument system 1.3 software update:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Total cost per
           Labor cost                 Parts cost           airplane
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 work-hours x $85 per hour =     $600 to $1,500....  $770 to $1,670.
 $170.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We estimate the following costs to do the proposed avionics
upgrade to AVIO NG + 1.5 configuration:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Total cost per
               Labor cost                   Parts cost       airplane
------------------------------------------------------------------------
198 work-hours x $85 per hour = $16,830.        $233,120        $249,950
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;

    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket that contains the proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>)
is located at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Eclipse Aerospace, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2010-0691; Directorate
Identifier 2010-CE-027-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) action by August 23, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Model EA500 airplanes with the following
serial numbers (SNs) that are certificated in any category:
    (1) SNs 000105 through 000112, 000116 through 000119, 000121
through 000122, and 000125 through 000260;
    (2) SNs 000039 through 000104, 000113 through 000115, 000120,
and 000123 through 000124, that incorporate Performance Enhancement
& Drag Reduction Modification per any revision level of Eclipse SB
500-99-001; and
    (3) SNs 000001 through 000038, that incorporate Performance
Enhancement & Drag Reduction Modification per any revision level of
Eclipse SB 500-99-001 and Avionics Upgrade to AVIO NG Configuration
for ETT Configured Aircraft per any revision level of Eclipse SB
500-99-002.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 23:
Communications.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD results from reports of uncommanded changes to the
communications radio frequency, altitude preselect, and/or
transponder codes. We are issuing this AD to correct faulty
integration of hardware and software, which could result in
unannunciated, uncommanded changes in communications radio
frequency, transponder codes, and altitude preselect settings. These
uncommanded changes could result in loss of communication with air
traffic control due to improper communications frequency, autopilot
level off at the incorrect altitude, or air traffic control loss of
proper tracking of the aircraft.

Compliance

    (f) To address this problem, you must do the following, unless
already done:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Actions                             Compliance                            Procedures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Incorporate either of the         Incorporate within the next 6 months  Follow, as appropriate, Eclipse
 following set of upgrades:            after the effective date of this      Aviation Required Service Bulletin
(i) Electronic flight instrument       AD.                                   SB 500-31-015, REV D, dated January
 system (EFIS) 1.3 software update                                           14, 2009; or Eclipse Aviation
 with one of the following airplane                                          Recommended Service Bulletin SB 500-
 flight manual revisions:                                                    99-005, REV A, dated February 16,
                                                                             2009.
    (A) Temporary Revision (TR) 010,
     Airplane Flight Manual part
     number (P/N) 06[dash]122204
     Before 3-45, Revision 01 and TR
     009, Quick Reference Handbook P/
     N 06[dash]122205, Revision 01;
    (B) TR 010A, Airplane Flight
     Manual P/N 06-122204 Before 3-
     51, Revision 02 and TR 009A,
     Quick Reference Handbook P/N 06-
     122205, Revision 02, or
    (C) Airplane Flight Manual P/N
     06[dash]122204 Revision 3,
     dated February 3, 2010, and
     Quick Reference Handbook P/N
     06[dash]122205, Revision 03.
    (ii) Avionics upgrade to AVIO NG
     + 1.5 Configuration and
     Aircraft Flight Manual, P/N
     06[dash]122204, Revision 2,
     dated November 7, 2008, or AVIO
     NG + 1.5 configuration and
     Aircraft Flight Manual, P/N
     06[dash]122204, Revision 3,
     dated February 10, 2010.

(2) Send the completed service        Within 30 days after you incorporate  Not Applicable.
 bulletin compliance record required   the revisions required by paragraph
 by paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD     (f)(1)(i) of this AD or paragraph
 or paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of this AD    (f)(1)(ii) of this AD or within 30
 to the address identified in          days after the effective date of
 paragraph (g) of this AD. The         this AD, whichever occurs later.
 Office of Management and Budget
 (OMB) approved the information
 collection requirements contained
 in this regulation under the
 provisions of the Paperwork
 Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C.
 3501 et seq.) and assigned OMB
 Control Number 2120-0056.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (g) The Manager, Fort Worth Airplane Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Eric Kinney, Fort Worth ACO, Aerospace Engineer, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:
(817) 222-5960. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking
a PI, your local FSDO.

Related Information

    (h) To get copies of the service information referenced in this
AD, contact Eclipse Aviation Corporation, 2503 Clark Carr Loop, SE.,
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. To view
the AD docket, go to U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on July 1, 2010.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-16740 Filed 7-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P