[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 59 (Friday, March 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16503-16506]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07056]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2014-0071]

Hours of Service of Drivers: McKee Foods Transportation, LLC,
Application for Exemption

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of final disposition; grant of application for
exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to grant an exemption to McKee
Foods Transportation, LLC (MFT) from certain provisions of the Agency's
hours-of-service (HOS) regulations. MFT proposed that its team drivers
be granted an exemption from the HOS rules pertaining to use of a
sleeper berth (SB). Current HOS rules require that all SB rest regimens
include, in part, the use of an SB for at least 8 hours--combined with
a separate period of at least 2 hours, either in the SB, off-duty or
some combination of both--to gain the equivalent of at least 10
consecutive hours off duty. The exemption will allow MFT's team drivers
to take the equivalent of 10 consecutive hours off duty by splitting SB
time into two periods totaling 10 hours, provided neither of the two
periods is less than 3 hours.

DATES: This exemption is effective March 27, 2015 and expires on March
27, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Pearlie Robinson, Driver and
Carrier Operations Division; Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle
Safety Standards; Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments submitted to notice requesting public comments on the
exemption application, go to www.regulations.gov at any time or visit
Room W12-140 on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, Monday
through

Friday, except Federal holidays. The on-line Federal document
management system is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year.
The docket number is listed at the beginning of this notice.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to grant
exemptions from certain parts of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations. FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption request in
the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must provide the
public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant to the
application, including any safety analyses that have been conducted.
The Agency must also provide an opportunity for public comment on the
request.
    The Agency reviews safety analyses and public comments submitted,
and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). The decision of
the Agency must be published in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(b)) with the reasons for denying or granting the application
and, if granted, the name of the person or class of persons receiving
the exemption, and the regulatory provision from which the exemption is
granted. The notice must also specify the effective period and explain
the terms and conditions of the exemption. The exemption may be renewed
(49 CFR 381.300(b)).

Request for Exemption

    MFT is a private carrier that sells fresh snack food products under
the Little Debbie, Sunbelt, and Drake's brands. MFT delivers products
in interstate commerce to 48 states and parts of Canada from three
manufacturing distribution centers and one stand-alone distribution
center. MFT employs approximately 650 drivers, using more than 300
tractor-trailer combinations. MFT's average driver is on duty
approximately 35-45 hours per week with the majority of the on-duty
time split between driving and unloading the trailer. A typical trip
averages six stops. Some of the trips make backhauls--both private and
for-hire. The average round trip is about 1,000 miles. A team usually
delivers two trailer loads per week, with time at home between most
trips.
    MFT states that it operates on a routine weekly cycle. Each
workweek contains a regular subset of daily cycles dispatching and
returning long-, medium- and short-range trips. MFT advises that it has
a constant flow of outbound and inbound trucks that allow it to
continuously ship fresh-baked goods and return with backhauls of raw
materials and other for-hire loads. The routine cycles allow most of
the drivers to have regular schedules. Many of MFT's drivers are off
duty at least 48 consecutive hours every week while many others are off
duty at least 72 consecutive hours. MFT's tractors are equipped with
double-bunk sleepers in the event both drivers need or want to rest at
the same time. Drivers are allowed to make their own decisions about
when and where to take short rest breaks based on their personal needs
and preferences in conformance with current regulatory requirements.
MFT advises that it takes driver safety, health and wellness seriously,
and hires well-qualified drivers who go through a comprehensive
orientation/new hire training program. MFT's trucks are equipped with
automatic on-board recording devices (AOBRDs) that produce electronic
records of duty status.
    MFT requested an exemption from the current regulations for its
delivery shipments and backhaul activity operations to eliminate the
requirement that SB time include a period of at least 8 but less than
10 consecutive hours in the SB and a separate period of at least 2 but
less than 10 consecutive hours either in the SB or off duty, or any
combination thereof (49 CFR 395.1(g)(1)(ii)(A)(1)). MFT proposed that
these team drivers be allowed to split SB time into two periods
totaling at least 10 hours, provided neither of the two periods is less
than 3 hours in length. The exemption would be limited to team drivers.
    MFT states that the activities of its team drivers involve both
driving and offloading product to its customers. The drivers average
approximately 53 hours per week on the road away from home. MFT states
that approximately 30 percent of this time is spent in the sleeper. MFT
contends that the experience of its drivers has demonstrated that
sleeping in a moving vehicle is more difficult than in a stopped truck.
According to MFT, having the flexibility to switch with a partner
allows each driver to take advantage of shorter time periods when they
may feel fatigued. MFT further stated, this will result in a more-
flexible work pattern, allowing both drivers to perform warehouse
functions together (to reduce driver unloading time and improve
maneuvering in the warehouse), and improving personal and vehicular
safety.
    MFT states that it is committed to maintaining its outstanding
safety record by focusing on continuous improvement, promoting
technologies to enhance safety, conducting thorough inspections and
having well-communicated policies in place to address both safety and
compliance-related topics. MFT identified some countermeasures it would
take to maintain safe operations if the exemption is granted. The
safeguards include, but are not limited to:
     Every week, all transportation operations shut down one
hour prior to sundown on Friday until one hour after sundown on
Saturday, resulting in an automatic minimum 26 hour off-duty home time
for all drivers in addition to two or three days home time during the
week;
     All tractors are equipped with speed limiters;
     Drivers use AOBRDs to track their duty time and HOS
compliance;
     Drive time is reduced from 11 hours to 10 hours. Team
drivers are limited to 10 hours of driving prior to completing their
required 10 hours total SB.
     Behavior-based event data is monitored from the enhanced
AOBRDs to improve safety measures already in place to help reduce the
probability of accidents on the road.
    MFT believes that by allowing its team drivers to exercise
flexibility in their SB requirements, the drivers would experience more
quality rest. To support its request for the exemption, MFT cited the
results of an FMCSA-sponsored study entitled ``Investigation of the
Effects of Split Sleep Schedules on Commercial Vehicle Driver Safety
and Health.'' \1\ The report noted ``that when consolidated nighttime
sleep is not possible, split sleep is preferable to consolidated
daytime sleep.'' (http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/51000/51200/51254/12-003-Split-Sleep_Investigation-of-the-Effects-of-Split-Sleep-Schedules-on-Commercial-Vehicle-Driver-Safety-and-Health-508.pdf)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Belenky, G., Jackson, M.L., Tompkins, L., Satterfield, B.,
Bender, A., ``Investigation of the Effects of Split Sleep Schedules
on Commercial Vehicle Driver Safety and Health,'' FMCSA, Dec. 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A copy of MFT's application for exemption is available for review
in the docket for this notice.

Public Comments

    On May 12, 2014, FMCSA published notice of this application, and
asked for public comment (79 FR 27041). Twelve commenters responded.
Eight commenters supported the application, three commenters opposed it
and one individual commented but did not

indicate whether he supported or opposed the application.
    The three comments opposing the exemption were from two individuals
and the Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (Advocates). Mr. Charles
McKown said, ``I am EXTREMELY opposed.'' Mr. Michael Millard said,
``The request for an exemption from the HOS sets in motion a slippery
slope; whereas, if the FMCSA grants the exemption they are indicating
the current HOS is not suitable for acquiring the needed rest. If FMCSA
grants the exemption they can expect to be hounded by other motor
carriers to participate in the exemption or submit a new exemption
based on the individual carrier's needs. If the exemption is approved
then it creates problems for MCSAP officers performing roadside
inspections as the MCSAP officers would have to be trained on how to
calculate the HOS sleeper berth provision costing the tax payers
thousands if not hundreds of thousands of dollars in training the MCSAP
officers.''
    The Advocates stated that, ``The applicant has provided no
definitive proof that the proposed alternative HOS, changing the
sleeper berth requirements to allow sleeper berth periods to be broken
into two periods of no less than 3 hours, would in any way ensure
safety or address the agency's concerns regarding acute and cumulative
fatigue which was the impetus for the requirement.'' The Advocates
contend that the controls listed by MFT in no way constitute a safety
analysis on par with that required by statute. Seven comments
supporting the application were submitted by MFT employees.
    The American Trucking Associations, Inc. (ATA) also supports the
exemption. The ATA said, ``ATA strongly supports McKee Foods
Transportation, LLC's (MFT) application for exemption from 49 CFR
395.1(g)(1)(ii)(A)(1-2). ATA has long contended that the currently
prescribed sleeper berth rules do not introduce enough flexibility into
the delicate equation of driver rest, sleep and performance. MFT's
application for exemption provides FMCSA with an excellent opportunity
to observe the safety and, perhaps health benefits of allowing
additional flexibility into sleeper berth utilization and should be
granted without delay.''
    All comments are available for review in the docket for this
notice.

FMCSA Response to Public Comments and Agency Decision

    Prior to publishing the Federal Register notice announcing the
receipt of MFT's exemption request, FMCSA ensured that MFT has a
current USDOT registration, minimum required levels of insurance, and
is not subject to any ``imminent hazard'' or other out-of-service (OOS)
orders. The Agency conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the safety
performance history of the applicant during the review process. As part
of this process, FMCSA reviewed its Motor Carrier Management
Information System safety records for MFT, including inspection and
accident reports submitted to FMCSA by State agencies.
    With regard to Mr. Millard's comments, the Agency does not believe
that an exemption from the SB requirement is an indication that the
current HOS is not suitable for acquiring needed rest. An exemption in
this instance would only provide flexibility of how the 10 hours in the
SB are split but does not reduce the 10 hour rest requirement. Split SB
periods were allowed prior to 2003; therefore, many MCSAP officers
remain familiar with it, and training others can be done economically
through existing, continuing training methods.
    With regard to the Advocates comments, the Agency believes that the
FMCSA-sponsored study entitled ``Investigation of the Effects of Split
Sleep Schedules on Commercial Vehicle Driver Safety and Health'' \2\
cited by MFT provides a reasonable basis for an exemption of this type,
which will enable FMCSA to observe the effects of split sleep in a real
world context over a substantial time period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Belenky, G., Jackson, M.L., Tompkins, L., Satterfield, B.,
Bender, A.,''Investigation of the Effects of Split Sleep Schedules
on Commercial Vehicle Driver Safety and Health,'' FMCSA, Dec. 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Agency is well aware that preventing fatigue is a complex
process taking into account numerous factors such as time of day,
amount and timing of sleep, time awake and time on task. The Agency
believes that the controls identified in MFT's application, including a
26-hour off duty period every week, reduction of daily driving time
from 11 hours to 10 hours and monitoring data from AOBRDs, will ensure
that safety is not adversely affected.
    The FMCSA has evaluated MFT's application, safety record, and the
public comments. The Agency believes that MFT will likely achieve a
level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level of
safety achieved without the exemption [49 CFR 381.305(a)], and grants
the requested exemption covering the operations of team drivers
employed by MFT.

Terms and Conditions of the Exemption

Period of the Exemption

    This exemption from the requirements of 49 CFR
395.1(g)(1)(ii)(A)(1-2)) is effective during the period of March 27,
2015 through March 27, 2016. The exemption will expire on March 27,
2016, 11:59 p.m. local time, unless renewed.

Extent of the Exemption

    The team drivers employed by MFT are provided a limited exemption
from the SB requirements of 49 CFR 395.1(g)(1)(ii)(A)(1-2)) to allow
these drivers to split SB time into two periods totaling at least 10
hours, provided neither of the two periods is less than 3 hours in
length. Team drivers will use electronic logging devices to track
records of duty status; have a minimum 26-hour off-duty period, at
home, from Friday night to Saturday night; and, be limited to 10 hours
of driving following their required 10 consecutive hours off duty, or
the SB equivalent.

Other Conditions

    The exemption is contingent upon MFT maintaining USDOT
registration, minimum levels of public liability insurance, and not
being subject to any ``imminent hazard'' or other OOS order issued by
FMCSA. Each team driver covered by the exemption must maintain a valid
CDL with the required endorsements, not be subject to any OOS order or
suspension of driving privileges, and meet all physical qualifications
required by 49 CFR part 391.

Preemption

    During the period this exemption is in effect, no State may enforce
any law or regulation that conflicts with or is inconsistent with the
exemptions with respect to a person or entity operating under the
exemptions (49 U.S.C. 31315(d)).

FMCSA Accident Notification

    MFT must notify FMCSA within 5 business days of any accidents (as
defined by 49 CFR 390.5) involving the operation of any of its CMVs
while utilizing this exemption. The notification must be by email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and include the following information:
    a. Date of the accident,
    b. City or town, and State, in which the accident occurred, or
which is closest to the scene of the accident,
    c. Driver's name and driver's license number,
    d. Vehicle number and State license number,

    e. Number of individuals suffering physical injury,
    f. Number of fatalities,
    g. The police-reported cause of the accident,
    h. Whether the driver was cited for violation of any traffic laws,
or motor carrier safety regulations, and
    i. The total driving time and the total on-duty time of the CMV
driver at the time of the accident.

Termination

    The FMCSA does not believe the team drivers covered by the
exemption will experience any deterioration of their safety record.
However, should this occur, FMCSA will take all steps necessary to
protect the public interest, including revocation of the exemption. The
FMCSA will immediately revoke the exemption for failure to comply with
its terms and conditions.

    Issued on: March 19, 2015.
T.F. Scott Darling, III,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-07056 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27428-27429]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10674]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP16-9-000]

Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC, Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline,
LLC; Notice of Availability of the Environmental Assessment for the
Proposed Atlantic Bridge Project Replacement Project

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for the
Atlantic Bridge Project proposed by Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC
(Algonquin) and Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, LLC (Maritimes),
collectively referred to as the Applicants, in the above-referenced
docket. The Applicants request authorization to expand existing
pipeline systems to deliver up to 132,705 dekatherms per day of natural
gas transportation service to the New England and Maritimes provinces
of Canada markets.
    The EA assesses the potential environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the Atlantic Bridge Project in accordance
with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. The
FERC staff concludes that approval of the proposed project, with
appropriate mitigating measures, would not constitute a major federal
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is a cooperating agency
assisting us in the preparation of this EA because they have special
expertise with respect to environmental impacts associated with the
Applicants' proposals.
    The proposed Atlantic Bridge Project includes the following
facilities:
     4.0 miles of 42-inch-diameter pipeline to replace existing
26-inch diameter pipeline in Westchester County, New York;
     2.3 miles of 42-inch-diameter pipeline to replace existing
26-inch diameter pipeline in Fairfield County, Connecticut;
     a new 7,700 horsepower compressor station (Weymouth
Compressor Station) in Norfolk County, Massachusetts;
     a new meter and regulating station in New London County,
Connecticut;
     modifications to three existing compressor stations in
Rockland County, New York and Windham and New Haven Counties,
Connecticut;
     modifications to five existing meter and regulating
stations and one regulator station in New York, Connecticut,
Massachusetts, and Maine; and
     ancillary facilities associated with the new pipeline
including mainline valves and pig launcher/receiver facilities.
    The FERC staff mailed copies of the EA to federal, state, and local
government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American tribes;
potentially affected landowners and other interested individuals and
groups; and newspapers and libraries in the project area. In addition,
the EA is available for public viewing on the FERC's Web site
(www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. A limited number of copies of
the EA are available for distribution and public inspection at: Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Reference Room, 888 First Street
NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any person wishing to comment on the EA may do so. Your comments
should focus on the potential environmental effects, reasonable
alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impacts.
The more specific your comments, the more useful they will be. To
ensure that the Commission has the opportunity to consider your
comments prior to making its decision on this project, it is important
that we receive your comments in Washington, DC on or before June 1,
2016.
    For your convenience, there are three methods you can use to file
your comments with the Commission. In all instances please reference
the project docket number (CP16-9-000) with your submission. The
Commission encourages electronic filing of comments and has expert
staff available to assist you at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature located on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the
link to Documents and Filings. This is an easy method for submitting
brief, text-only comments on a project;
    (2) You can also file your comments electronically using the
eFiling feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the
link to Documents and Filings. With eFiling, you can provide comments
in a variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your
submission. New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking
on ``eRegister.'' You must select the type of filing you are making. If
you are filing a comment on a particular project, please select
``Comment on a Filing''; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the following address: Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Room 1A,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Any person seeking to become a party to the proceeding must file a
motion to intervene pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedures (Title 18 Code of Federal Regulations Part
385.214).\1\ Only intervenors have the right to seek rehearing of the
Commission's decision. The Commission grants affected landowners and
others with environmental concerns intervenor status upon showing good
cause by stating that they have a clear and direct interest in this
proceeding that no other party can adequately represent. Simply filing
environmental comments will not give you intervenor status, but you do
not need intervenor status to have your comments considered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See the previous discussion on the methods for filing
comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on ``General Search,'' and enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field (i.e., CP16-
9). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription, which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.

    Dated: May 2, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-10674 Filed 5-5-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 226 (Friday, November 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70033-70034]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28050]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR14-6-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas of Maryland, Inc.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b)(1)/.: Revised Statement
of Operating Conditions to be effective 10/9/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/8/13.
    Accession Number: 20131108-5128.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/29/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-162-000.
    Applicants: Questar Pipeline Company.
    Description: Sec. 5.1 Request for No-notice Service to be effective
12/14/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/13/13.
    Accession Number: 20131113-5030.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/13.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR Sec.  385.211 and Sec.  385.214) on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests
may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to
the proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP14-102-001.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Correction to tariff record in Docket No. RP14-102 to
be effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/12/13.
    Accession Number: 20131112-5153.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-102-002.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Correction 2 to tariff record in RP14-102 to
be effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/13/13.
    Accession Number: 20131113-5031.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-103-001.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Correction to tariff record in RP14-103 to be
effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/13/13.
    Accession Number: 20131113-5032.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-107-001.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.205(b): Correction to tariff record in RP14-107 to be effective
11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/13/13.
    Accession Number: 20131113-5037.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-97-001.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Correction to tariff records in Docket No. RP14-97-000
to be effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/12/13.
    Accession Number: 20131112-5152.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-97-002.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Correction 2 to tariff records in Docket No.
RP14-97-000 to be effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/13/13.
    Accession Number: 20131113-5028.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/13.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR Sec.  385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated November 13, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-28050 Filed 11-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


wInd=0&subtop=341&lv=list.listByChapter&r=216610 and contained in Docket
EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135.

 The global warming potentials (GWP) used in this rule are consistent
with the 100-year time frame values in the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4).  At this time,
the 1996 IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR) 100-year GWP values are
used in the official U.S. greenhouse gas inventory submission to the
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (per the reporting
requirements under that international convention, which were last
updated in 2006) .  N2O has a 100-year GWP of 298 and CH4 has a 100-year
GWP of 25 according to the 2007 IPCC AR4.

Chapter 1

*** E.O. 12866 Review – Revised Version – Do Not Cite, Quote, or
Release During Review ***

Page   PAGE  2

  PAGE   \* MERGEFORMAT  7-1

 2017 and Later Model Year Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions
and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards; Final Rule (77 FR
62623–63200), October 2012.

 MOVES (Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator) website:
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/index.htm

 U.S. EPA. 2013. “Memorandum to Docket:  Updates to MOVES for the Tier
3 NPRM”

 U.S. EPA. 2012. Memorandum to Docket: “Development of fuel
adjustments and toxic fractions for use in MOVES2010a using draft
statistical models generated using results from the Phase-3 EPAct
Project.”

 Particle Emissions from a 2009 Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Using
Different Commercially Available Fuels, SAE Paper 2010-01-2117, Imad A.
Khalek and Thomas Bougher, October 25, 2010.

 Development of a Predictive Model for Gasoline Vehicle Particulate
Matter Emissiosn, SAE Paper 2010-01-2115, Koichiro Aikawa and Takayuki
Sakurai, October 25, 2010.

 Masashi Iisuka, Japan Petroleum Energy Center, “Effect of Fuel
Properties on Emissions from Direct Injection Gasoline Vehicle,” 5th
Asian Petroleum Technology Symposium, Jakarta, Indonesia, January 25,
2007.

 Khalek, I., Bougher, T., and Merritt, P. M.  2009.  Phase 1 of the
Advanced Collaborative Emissions Study.  Prepared by Southwest Research
Institute for the Coordinating Research Council and the Health Effects
Institute, June 2009.  Available at  HYPERLINK "http://www.crcao.org"
www.crcao.org .

  U.S. EPA. 2013. “Memorandum to Docket:  Updates to MOVES for the
Tier 3 NPRM”

 U.S. EPA, 2008, Memorandum to Docket: Using MOVES to Generate
Inventories for the RFS2 NPRM.

 Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives:  Changes to Renewable Fuel
Standard Program; Final Rule (75 FR 14670), March 2010.

 RFS2 Final Rule Regulatory Impact Analysis, Chapter 3

 Coordinating Research Council (2011), Exhaust and Evaporative Emissions
Testing of Flexible Fuel Vehicles, CRC E-80

 R. Cook,  et al.  (2011).  Air quality impacts of increased use of
ethanol under the United States’ Energy Independence and Security Act.
 Atmospheric Environment, 45: 7714-7724.

 Luecken, D. J. et al. 2011.  Regional sources of atmospheric
formaldehyde and acetaldehyde, and implications for atmospheric
modeling.  Atmospheric Environment, in press.
doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.005

 "DOCUMENTATION FOR THE 2005 MOBILE NATIONAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY,
VERSION 2"
ftp://ftp.epa.gov/EmisInventory/2005_nei/mobile/2005_mobile_nei_version_
2_report.pdf

 Mathpro (October 2011). Refining Economics of a National Low Sulfur,
Low RVP Gasoline Standard, Performed for The International Council for
Clean Transportation,  Available at:
http://www.theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/ICCT04_Tier3_Rep
ort_Final_v4_All.pdf.  Accessed December 12, 2011.

 Baker and O’Brien (July 2011).Potential Supply and Cost Impacts of
Lower Sulfur, Lower RVP Gasoline; prepared for The American Petroleum
Institute. Available at:
http://www.api.org/Newsroom/upload/110715_LowerSulfur_LowerRVP_Final.pdf
.  Accessed December 12, 2011

 U.S.. EPA.2011. Development of Emission Rates for Light-Duty Vehicles
in the Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES2010): Final Report.
(EPA-420-R-11-011)
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/documents/420r11011.pdf.

 U.S. EPA. 2011. Memorandum to Docket: Tier 3 Emission Rates for
Gasoline Light Duty HC/CO/NOx Exhaust

 U.S. EPA. 2013. “Memorandum to Docket:  Updates to MOVES for the Tier
3 NPRM”

 U.S. EPA. 2013. “Memorandum to Docket:  Updates to MOVES for the Tier
3 NPRM”

 U.S. EPA. 2013. “Memorandum to Docket:  Updates to MOVES for the Tier
3 NPRM”

 Sonntag, Darrell. 2013.  Supporting Technical Document:  Estimated
Reductions in Particulate Matter Emissions from Light-duty and
Medium-duty Gasoline vehicles through Implementation of Tier 3
Regulations.

 Defries, et. al. 2011. “Estimates of the Fraction of the Fleet with
High Evaporative Emissions based on the Ken Caryl Station “(Denver,
Colorado) Field Study, Eastern Research Group report to EPA
0<IP_ADDRESS>

 Haskew, Harold, et al. 2011.  “Vehicle Evaporative Emission
Mechanisms:  A Pilot Study,”  available at   HYPERLINK
"http://crcao.org/reports/recentstudies2008/E-77PilotStudy/E-77PilotStud
yFinalReport6.24.08.pdf"
http://crcao.org/reports/recentstudies2008/E-77PilotStudy/E-77PilotStudy
FinalReport6.24.08.pdf

U.S. EPA. 2011.  MOVES2010 Fuel Adjustment and Air Toxic Emission
Calculation Algorithm –Development and Results (EPA-420-R-11-009)
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/documents/420r11009.pdf

 U.S. EPA.  2013. "The Effects of Fuel Sulfur Level on Emissions from
Tier 2 Vehicles In-Use" (draft).

 See Chapter III and Appendix B of the Regulatory Impact Analysis for
the Tier2/Sulfur Final Rule EPA 420-R-99-023.

 See Chapter 6 of the Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Control of
Hazardous Air Pollutants from Mobile Sources Final Rule, EPA
420-R-07-002.

 Ball D., Clark D., Moser D. 2011. “Effects of Fuel Sulfur on FTP NOx
Emissions from a PZEV 4 Cylinder Application”. SAE 2011 World Congress
Paper 2011-01-0300.  SAE International: Warrendale, PA.

 U.S. EPA.  2005 EPA’s National Inventory Model (NMIM), A Consolidated
Emissions Modeling System for MOBILE6 and NONROAD; EPA420-R-05-024;
Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Ann Arbor, MI.   HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/nmim/420r05024.pdf"
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/nmim/420r05024.pdf

 Final Rulemaking: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel
Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles
(signed August 9, 2011).
http://www.epa.gov/oms/climate/regulations.htm#1-2

 Final Rule: Control of Emissions of Air Pollution from Locomotives and
Marine Compression-Ignition Engines Less Than 30 Liters per Cylinder
(published May 6, 2008 and republished June 30, 2008).
http://www.epa.gov/oms/locomotives.htm#2008final

 Final Rule: Control of Emissions from New Marine Compression-Ignition
Engines at or Above 30 Liters per Cylinder (published April 30, 2010).
http://www.epa.gov/oms/oceanvessels.htm#car-ems.

 U.S. Energy Information Administration (2011),  Annual Energy Outlook
2011, DOE/EIA-0383(2011)

 U.S. EPA 2011, Tier 3 Emissions Inventory for Air Quality Modeling
Technical Support Document

 U.S. EPA 2011.  Tier 3 Emissions Inventory for Air Quality Modeling
Technical Support Document

 User’s Guide for the SMOKE–MOVES Integration Tool, July 14, 2010.
Available at http://www.smoke-model.org/smoke_moves_tool/.

 For more information, please see the website for SMOKE:   HYPERLINK
"http://www.smoke-model.org/index.cfm"
http://www.smoke-model.org/index.cfm .

  Michaels, H. (2011, December).  Documentation of Smoke-MOVES
Post-Processing Script Inconsistency. Memorandum to the docket.

 Grell, G., J. Dudhia, and D. Stauffer, 1994: A Description of the
Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5),
NCAR/TN-398+STR., 138 pp, National Center for Atmospheric Research,
Boulder CO.

 "Air Quality Modeling Technical Support Document: Heavy-Duty Vehicle
Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards Final Rule", (EPA-454-R-11-004, August
2011) (http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/documents/454r11004.pdf)

 "Documentation for the 2005 Mobile National Emissions Inventory,
Version 2",  (December 2008)
(ftp://ftp.epa.gov/EmisInventory/2005_nei/mobile/2005_mobile_nei_version
_2_report.pdf)

 U.S. EPA. 2010 MOVES2010 Highway Vehicle Population and Activity Data,
EPA-420-R-10-026, http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/420r10026.pdf

 Documentation for the 2005 Mobile National Emissions Inventory, Version
2",  (December 2008)
(ftp://ftp.epa.gov/EmisInventory/2005_nei/mobile/2005_mobile_nei_version
_2_report.pdf)

 U. S. EPA. 2011.  Spreadsheet
“Comparison_VMT_future_15jul2011.xlsx.”  Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135

 "Development of Methodology for Estimating VMT Weighting by Facility
Type", (EPA420-R-01-009, M6.SPD.003, April 2001) . Prepared for EPA by
Systems Applications International, Inc., ICF Consulting Group.
(http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/mobile6/r01009.pdf)

 U.S. EPA 2011.  Tier 3 Emissions Inventory for Air Quality Modeling
Technical Support Document.

 U.S. EPA 2011.  Tier 3 Emissions Inventory for Air Quality Modeling
Technical Support Document .

 Cook, R. 2012.  Development of Air Quality Reference Case Upstream and
Portable Fuel Container Inventories for Tier 3 Proposal. Memorandum to
Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162.

U.S. EPA. 2009.  Exhaust Emission Profiles for EPA SPECIATE Database:
Energy Policy Act (EPAct) Low-Level Ethanol Fuel Blends and Tier 2
Light-Duty Vehicles.  EPA-20-R-09-002, June 2009.

 U.S. EPA. 2010. Evaporative Emissions from In-Use Vehicles: Test Fleet
Expansion (CRC E-77-2b). EPA-420-R-10-025. Available at:
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/emission-factors-research/420r10025.pdf.
Accessed December 15, 2011.

 Coordinating Research Council. 2010. Study To Determine Evaporative
Emission Breakdown, Including Permeation Effects and Diurnal Emissions,
Using E20 Fuels on Aging Enhanced Evaporative Emissions Certified
Vehicles (CRC E-77-2c). Available at:
http://www.crcao.com/reports/recentstudies2011/E-77-2c/E-77-2c%20Final%2
0Report%20for%20sure%201-28-11.pdf.  Accessed December 15, 2011.

 U.S. EPA. 2011.  Hydrocarbon Composition of Gasoline Vapor Emissions
from Enclosed Fuel Tanks. EPA-420-R-11-018.  Available in the docket to
this rule.

 U.S. EPA. 2013, January. Mobile Source Hydrocarbon Speciation Profiles
for the Tier 3 Rule NPRM and Anti-backsliding Study AQ Modeling.
Memorandum to the docket.

 Byun, D.W., Ching, J. K.S. 1999. Science algorithms of the EPA models-3
community multiscale air quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Washington, DC:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and
Development.

 Byun, D.W., Schere, K.L. (2006). Review of the Governing Equations,
Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community
Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System. Journal of Applied
Mechanics Reviews, 59(2), 51-77.

 Dennis, R.L., Byun, D.W., Novak, J.H., Galluppi, K.J., Coats, C.J., and
Vouk, M.A. (1996). The next generation of integrated air quality
modeling: EPA’s Models-3, Atmospheric Environment, 30, 1925-1938.

 Hogrefe, C., Biswas, J., Lynn, B., Civerolo, K., Ku, J.Y., Rosenthal,
J., et al. (2004). Simulating regional-scale ozone climatology over the
eastern United States: model evaluation results. Atmospheric
Environment, 38(17), 2627-2638.

 Lin, M., Oki, T., Holloway, T., Streets, D.G., Bengtsson, M., Kanae, S.
(2008). Long-range transport of acidifying substances in East Asia-Part
I: Model evaluation and sensitivity studies. Atmospheric Environment,
42(24), 5939-5955.

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2008). Technical support
document for the final locomotive/marine rule: Air quality modeling
analyses. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality
Assessment Division.

 Grell, G., Dudhia, J., Stauffer, D. (1994). A Description of the
Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5),
NCAR/TN-398+STR., 138 pp, National Center for Atmospheric Research,
Boulder CO.

 Grell, G., Dudhia, J., Stauffer, D. (1994). A Description of the
Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5),
NCAR/TN-398+STR., 138 pp, National Center for Atmospheric Research,
Boulder CO.

 Byun, D.W., Ching, J. K.S. (1999). Science algorithms of EPA Models-3
Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system,
EPA/600/R-99/030, Office of Research and Development).  Please also see:
  HYPERLINK "http://www.cmascenter.org/" http://www.cmascenter.org/ .

 Le Sager, P. Yantosca, B., Carouge, C. (2008). GEOS-CHEM v8-01-02
User’s Guide, Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Group, Harvard
University, Cambridge, MA, December 18, 2008.

 U.S. EPA, (2004), Procedures for Estimating Future PM2.5 Values for the
CAIR Final Rule by Application of the (Revised) Speciated Modeled
Attainment Test (SMAT)- Updated 11/8/04.

 U.S. EPA, (2011), Final Cross State Air Pollution Rule Air Quality
Modeling TSD.

 U.S. EPA (2007) Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses For
Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM2.5, and
Regional Haze; EPA-454/B-07-002; Research Triangle Park, NC; April 2007.

 Yarwood G, Rao S, Yocke M, Whitten GZ (2005) Updates to the Carbon Bond
Chemical Mechanism: CB05. Final Report to the U.S. EPA, RT-0400675,
December 8, 2005.
http://www.camx.com/publ/pdfs/CB05_Final_Report_120805.pdf.

 U.S. EPA. 2013. “Memorandum to Docket:  Updates to MOVES for the Tier
3 NPRM”

 Dodge, M.C., 2000. Chemical oxidant mechanisms for air quality
modeling:  critical review. Atmospheric Environment 34, 2103-2130.

 Atkinson, R., Baulch, D.L., Cox, R.A., Crowley, J.N., Hampson, R.F.
Jr., Hynes, R.G., Jenkin, M.E., Kerr, J.A., Rossi, M.J., Troe, J. (2005)
Evaluated Kinetic and Photochemical Data for Atmospheric Chemistry -
IUPAC Subcommittee on Gas Kinetic Data Evaluation for Atmospheric
Chemistry. July 2005 web version.
http://www.iupac-kinetic.ch.cam.ac.uk/index.html.

 Atkinson, R., Baulch, D.L., Cox, R.A., Crowley, J.N., Hampson, R.F.
Jr., Hynes, R.G., Jenkin, M.E., Kerr, J.A., Rossi, M.J., Troe, J. (2005)
Evaluated Kinetic and Photochemical Data for Atmospheric Chemistry -
IUPAC Subcommittee on Gas Kinetic Data Evaluation for Atmospheric
Chemistry. July 2005 web version.
http://www.iupac-kinetic.ch.cam.ac.uk/index.html.

 Atkinson, R., Baulch, D.L., Cox, R.A., Crowley, J.N., Hampson, R.F.
Jr., Hynes, R.G., Jenkin, M.E., Kerr, J.A., Rossi, M.J., Troe, J. (2005)
Evaluated Kinetic and Photochemical Data for Atmospheric Chemistry -
IUPAC Subcommittee on Gas Kinetic Data Evaluation for Atmospheric
Chemistry. July 2005 web version.
http://www.iupac-kinetic.ch.cam.ac.uk/index.html.

 Atkinson, R., Baulch, D.L., Cox, R.A., Crowley, J.N., Hampson, R.F.
Jr., Hynes, R.G., Jenkin, M.E., Kerr, J.A., Rossi, M.J., Troe, J. (2005)
Evaluated Kinetic and Photochemical Data for Atmospheric Chemistry -
IUPAC Subcommittee on Gas Kinetic Data Evaluation for Atmospheric
Chemistry. July 2005 web version.
http://www.iupac-kinetic.ch.cam.ac.uk/index.html.

 Sander, S.P., Friedl, R.R., Golden, D.M., Kurylo, M.J., Huie, R.E.,
Orkin, V.L., Moortgat, G.K., Ravishankara, A.R., Kolb, C.E., Molina,
M.J., Finlayson-Pitts, B.J. (2003) Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical
Data for use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation Number 14. NASA Jet
Propulsion Laboratory http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov/index.html.

 J.G. Calvert, A. Mellouki, J.J. Orlando, M.J. Pilling, and T.J.
Wallington, 2011. The mechanisms of atmospheric oxidation of the
oxygenates. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.

 Sander, S.P., Friedl, R.R., Golden, D.M., Kurylo, M.J., Huie, R.E.,
Orkin, V.L., Moortgat, G.K., Ravishankara, A.R., Kolb, C.E., Molina,
M.J., Finlayson-Pitts, B.J. (2003) Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical
Data for use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation Number 14. NASA Jet
Propulsion Laboratory http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov/index.html.

 Yarwood, G., Rao, S., Yocke, M., Whitten, G.Z., 2005. Updates to the
Carbon Bond Mechanism: CB05.  Final Report to the U.S. EPA, RT-0400675.
Yocke and Company, Novato, CA.

 Luecken, D.J., Phillips, S., Sarwar, G., Jang, C., 2008b. Effects of
using the CB05 vs. SAPRC99 vs. CB4 chemical mechanism on model
predictions: Ozone and gas-phase photochemical precursor concentrations.
Atmospheric Environment 42, 5805-5820.

 Sander, S.P., Friedl, R.R., Golden, D.M., Kurylo, M.J., Huie, R.E.,
Orkin, V.L., Moortgat, G.K., Ravishankara, A.R., Kolb, C.E., Molina,
M.J., Finlayson-Pitts, B.J., 2003. Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical
Data for use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation Number 14. NASA Jet
Propulsion Laboratory.

 Sander, S.P., Friedl, R.R., Golden, D.M., Kurylo, M.J., Huie, R.E.,
Orkin, V.L., Moortgat, G.K., Ravishankara, A.R., Kolb, C.E., Molina,
M.J., Finlayson-Pitts, B.J., 2003. Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical
Data for use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation Number 14. NASA Jet
Propulsion Laboratory.

 Atkinson R, Arey J (2003) Atmospheric Degradation of Volatile Organic
Compounds. Chem Rev 103: 4605-4638.

 Atkinson, R., Baulch, D.L., Cox, R.A., Crowley, J.N., Hampson, R.F.
Jr., Hynes, R.G., Jenkin, M.E., Kerr, J.A., Rossi, M.J., Troe, J. (2005)
Evaluated Kinetic and Photochemical Data for Atmospheric Chemistry -
IUPAC Subcommittee on Gas Kinetic Data Evaluation for Atmospheric
Chemistry. July 2005 web version.
http://www.iupac-kinetic.ch.cam.ac.uk/index.html.

 Edney, E. O., T. E. Kleindienst, M. Lewandowski, and J. H. Offenberg,
2007. Updated SOA chemical mechanism for the Community Multi-Scale Air
Quality model, EPA 600/X-07/025, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.

 Carlton, A.G., B. J. Turpin, K. Altieri, S. Seitzinger, R. Mathur, S.
Roselle, R. J. Weber, (2008),  CMAQ model performance enhanced when
in-cloud SOA is included: comparisons of OC predictions with
measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (23), 8798–8802.

 Lewandowski M, M Jaoui , JH Offenberg , TE Kleindienst, EO Edney, RJ
Sheesley, JJ Schauer (2008)  Primary and secondary contributions to
ambient PM in the midwestern United States, Environ Sci Technol
42(9):3303-3309.
http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/article.cgi/esthag/2008/42/i09/html/es072041
2.html.

 Kleindienst TE, M Jaoui, M Lewandowski, JH Offenberg, EO Edney (2007)
Estimates of the contributions of biogenic and anthropogenic
hydrocarbons to secondary organic aerosol at a southeastern U.S.
location, Atmos Environ 41(37):8288-8300.

 Offenberg JH, CW Lewis, M Lewandowski, M Jaoui, TE Kleindienst, EO
Edney (2007) Contributions of Toluene and -pinene to SOA Formed in an
Irradiated Toluene/-pinene,NOx/Air Mixture: Comparison of Results
Using 14C Content and SOA Organic Tracer Methods, Environ Sci Technol
41: 3972-3976.

 Pandis, S.N., Harley, R.A., Cass, G.R., Seinfeld, J.H. (1992) Secondary
organic aerosol formation and transport. Atmos Environ 26, 2269–2282.

 Takekawa, H. Minoura, H. Yamazaki, S. (2003) Temperature dependence of
secondary organic aerosol formation by photo-oxidation of hydrocarbons.
Atmos Environ 37: 3413–3424.

 Kleeman, M.J., Ying, Q., Lu, J., Mysliwiec, M.J., Griffin, R.J., Chen,
J., Clegg, S. (2007) Source apportionment of secondary organic aerosol
during a severe photochemical smog episode. Atmos Environ 41: 576–591.

 Robinson, A. L.; Donahue, N. M.; Shrivastava, M.; Weitkamp, E. A.;
Sage, A. M.; Grieshop, A. P.; Lane, T. E.; Pierce, J. R.; Pandis, S. N.
(2007) Rethinking organic aerosol: Semivolatile emissions and
photochemical aging. Science 315: 1259-1262.

 Griffin, R. J.; Cocker, D. R.; Seinfeld, J. H.; Dabdub, D. (1999)
Estimate of global atmospheric organic aerosol from oxidation of
biogenic hydrocarbons. Geophys Res Lett 26 ( 17) 2721– 2724

 Lewis, C. W.; Klouda, G. A.; Ellenson, W. D. (2004) Radiocarbon
measurement of the biogenic contribution to summertime PM-2.5 ambient
aerosol in Nashville, TN. Atmos Environ 38 ( 35) 6053– 6061.

 Byun DW, Schere, KL (2006) Review of the Governing Equations,
Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community
Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System, J Applied Mechanics
Reviews 59: 51-76.

 U. S. EPA (2010) Our Nations Air, Status and Trends through 2008. EPA
454/R-09-002, February 2010. http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/2010.

 U. S. EPA. (2011) 2005 National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment.
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/nata2005/risksum.html.

 U. S. EPA (2007) Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Control of
Hazardous Air Pollutants from Mobile Sources Rule, Chapter 3, Air
Quality and Resulting Health and Welfare Effects of Air Pollution from
Mobile Sources. 72 FR 8428, February 26, 2007.
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/toxics/420r07002.pdf.

 Lim, Y.B., Ziemann, P.J. (2009) Effects of Molecular Structure on
Aerosol Yields from OH Radical-Initiated Reactions of Linear, Branched,
and Cyclic Alkanes in the Presence of NOX. Environ Sci Technol 43 (7):
2328-2334.

 Kleindienst, T.E. (2008) Hypothetical SOA Production from Ethanol
Photooxidation.  Memo to the Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161.

 Turpin, B.J., Huntzicker, J.J., Larson, S.M., Cass, G.R. (1991) Los
Angeles Summer Midday Particulate Carbon: Primary and Secondary Aerosol.
Environ Sci Technol 25: 1788-1793.

 Turpin, B.J., Huntzicker, J.J. (1995) Identification of Secondary
Organic Aerosol Episodes and Quantitation of Primary and Secondary
Organic Aerosol Concentrations During SCAQS. Atmos Environ 29(23):
3527-3544.

 Bae M-S, Schauer JJ, Turner JR (2006) Estimation of the Monthly Average
Ratios of Organic Mass to Organic Carbon for Fine Particulate Matter at
an Urban Site, Aerosol Sci Technol 40(12): 1123-1139.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820601004085.

 Kleindienst TE, M Jaoui, M Lewandowski, JH Offenberg, EO Edney (2007)
Estimates of the contributions of biogenic and anthropogenic
hydrocarbons to secondary organic aerosol at a southeastern U.S.
location. Atmos Environ 41(37):8288-8300.

 CW Lewis, M Lewandowski, M Jaoui, TE Kleindienst, EO Edney (2007)
Contributions of Toluene and -pinene to SOA Formed in an Irradiated
Toluene/-pinene,NOx/Air Mixture: Comparison of Results Using 14C
Content and SOA Organic Tracer Methods, Environ Sci Technol 41:
3972-3976.

idation of -pinene. Environ Sci Technol 41(5): 1628-1634.

"

,

]

_

†

Õ

×

ä

õ

฀

-

?

G

Y

o

p

’

”

h

h

 h

  h

 h

 h

hj

hj

hj

hj

h°r

)

)

)

O

h'

O

O

O

O

h'

 hãX

j

 hãX

”ÿ÷p

”ÿ÷p

”ÿ÷p

”ÿ÷p

”ÿ÷p

”ÿ÷p

摧ᚙ´ЀG摧厡

h

h

 h

#

+

W

X

h8

h8

¶

¶

¶

¶

¶

¶

ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

h¿

h¿S

h8

h£

h¿S

hÀ

hÀ

hÀ

hÀ

hÀ

hÀ

þ

h/"

hÀ

hÀ

hÀ

	ƒ

	ƒ

	ƒ

	ƒ

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

똇

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

܀Ⲕࠁ䛖̀ﾔҟᏃ⋧€f

 h

3

&

 h

 h

 h

 h

F

G

}

‡

‹

Œ

1

2

Ç

È

ȕ脈樃㡃

 h

H* h

&

ȕ脈樃㤽

ȕ脈樃㣀

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

H* h

 h

 h

 h

 h

  h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

H* h

 h

 h

  h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

H* h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

lð h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

  h

H* h

 h

 h

  h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

  h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

  h

 h

 h

 h

H*  h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

&

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

lð h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

ȕ脈樃㦺

 h

 h

 h

 hD

 h

摧䢦æԈ਀Ц䘋

 h

 h

 h

  h

 h

  h

H

	H

	H

	H

	H

	H

	H

	H

	H

	H

	H

	H

	H

 h

 h

摧䝲ú

 h

¡

 h

 h

 h

 h

h

 h

h

 h

H* h

+

,

ᔌꅨꡭᘀ써坶✀,

-

.

/

0

J

K

M

N

O

a

e

f

m

o

r

“

¡

¨

©

´

¸

ï

ð

ó

ô

÷

ø

'¡

ª

Â

Ò

÷

ü

*

+

4

7

B

C

E

G

H

K

L

O

V

W

š

Ä

Å

B

E

P

V

②朂⡤漶洀ĤȀÅ

 h

  h

 h

  h

 h

  h

 h

 h

7þ

7þ

7þ

7þ

7þ

7þ

7þ

7þ

7þ

7þ

7þ

7þ

7þ

7þ

 h

 h

H* h

h

 h

h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

ᘀ﹨靻唀Ĉč脈䠄栖凸

 h

 h

H* h

 h

 h

 h

 h

H* h

 h~

  h

 h

 h

  h

 h

 h

  h

H* h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

h

 h

h

 h

 h

  h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

 h

  h

 h

 h

 h

 h

昀Ĵ瑹ᢰǹ

昀Ĵ瑹ᢰǹ

 h

híg

hÿ

hÀ

hÀ

 hó

 hó

 hó

!

#

$

%

’

•

Ú

Û

Ü

Q

q

 h´

 hH'

倆㄀$摧篾ЀP摧篾

 hª

iated isoprene/NOX/SO2/air mixtures and their detection in ambient PM2.5
samples collected in the Eastern United States. Atmos Environ 39:
5281-5289.

 Jaoui M, TE Kleindienst, M Lewandowski, JH Offenberg, EO Edney (2005)
Identification and quantification of aerosol polar oxygenated compounds
bearing carboxylic or hydroxyl groups. 2. Organic tracer compounds from
monoterpenes. Environ Sci Technol 39: 5661-5673.

 Kleindienst TE, TS Conver, CD McIver, EO Edney (2004) Determination of
secondary organic aerosol products from the photooxidation of toluene
and their implications in ambient PM2.5. J Atmos  Chem 47: 70-100.

 Kleindienst TE, TS Conver, CD McIver, EO Edney (2004) Determination of
secondary organic aerosol products from the photooxidation of toluene
and their implication in ambient PM2.5,  J Atmos Chem 47: 70-100.

 Lewandowski M, M Jaoui , JH Offenberg , TE Kleindienst, EO Edney, RJ
Sheesley, JJ Schauer (2008)  Primary and secondary contributions to
ambient PM in the midwestern United States, Environ Sci Technol
42(9):3303-3309.
http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/article.cgi/esthag/2008/42/i09/html/es072041
2.html.

 Kleindienst TE, M Jaoui, M Lewandowski, JH Offenberg, EO Edney (2007)
Estimates of the contributions of biogenic and anthropogenic
hydrocarbons to secondary organic aerosol at a southeastern U.S.
location. Atmos Environ 41(37):8288-8300.

 Henze DK, JH Seinfeld (2006) Global secondary organic aerosol from
isoprene oxidation. Geophys Res Lett 33: L09812.
doi:10.1029/2006GL025976.

 Hildebrandt, L., Donahue1, N. M, Pandis1, S. N. (2009) High formation
of secondary organic aerosol from the photo-oxidation of toluene.  Atmos
Chem Phys 9: 2973-2986. Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135 9.

 Ng, N. L., Kroll, J. H., Chan, A. W. H., Chabra, P. S., Flagan, R. C.,
Seinfield, J. H., Secondary organic aerosol formation from m-xylene,
toluene, and benzene,  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussion, 7,
3909-3922, 2007.  Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135

 Henze, D. K., Seinfeld, J. H., Ng, N. L., Kroll, J. H.,
Fu, T.-M., Jacob, D. J., and Heald, C. L. (2008) Global modeling of
secondary organic aerosol formation from aromatic hydrocarbons: high-
vs. low-yield pathways, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2405-2420,
doi:10.5194/acp-8-2405-2008

 Lane, T. E., Donahue, N.M. and Pandis, S.N. (2008) Simulating secondary
organic aerosol formation using the volatility basis-set approach in a
chemical transport model, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7439-7451, doi:
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.026

 Carlton, A.G., Bhave, P.V., Napelenok, S.L., Edney, E.O., Sarwar, g.,
Pinder, R.W., Pouliot, G.A., Houyoux, M., (2010). Model Representation
of Secondary Organic Aerosol in CMAQv4.7. Environ Sci Technol 44(22),
8553-8560.

 Parikh, H.M., Carlton, A.G., Vizuete, W., and Kamen, R.M. (2011)
Modeling secondary organic aerosol using a dynamic partitioning approach
incorporating particle aqueous-phase chemistry, Atmospheric Environment,
45, 1126-1137.

 Volkamer, R., J.L. Jimenez, F. SanMartini,K.Dzepina,Q. Zhang,D.
Salcedo,L. T. Molina, D. R.Worsnop, and M. J. Molina (2006), Secondary
organic aerosol formation from anthropogenic air pollution: Rapid and
higher than expected, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17811,
doi:10.1029/2006GL026899.

 Carlton, A.G., Bhave, P.V., Napelenok, S.L., Edney, E.O., Sarwar, g.,
Pinder, R.W., Pouliot, G.A., Houyoux, M., (2010). Model Representation
of Secondary Organic Aerosol in CMAQv4.7. Environ Sci Technol 44(22),
8553-8560.

 Robinson, A. L.; Donahue, N. M.; Shrivastava, M.; Weitkamp, E. A.;
Sage, A. M.; Grieshop, A. P.; Lane, T. E.; Pierce, J. R.; Pandis, S. N.
(2007) Rethinking organic aerosol: Semivolatile emissions and
photochemical aging. Science 315: 1259-1262. Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135

 Carlton, A.G., Bhave, P.V., Napelenok, S.L., Edney, E.O., Sarwar, g.,
Pinder, R.W., Pouliot, G.A., Houyoux, M., (2010). Model Representation
of Secondary Organic Aerosol in CMAQv4.7. Environ Sci Technol 44(22),
8553-8560.

 Atkinson, R., Baulch, D.L., Cox, R.A., Crowley, J.N., Hampson, R.F.
Jr., Hynes, R.G., Jenkin, M.E., Kerr, J.A., Rossi, M.J., Troe, J. (2005)
Evaluated Kinetic and Photochemical Data for Atmospheric Chemistry -
IUPAC Subcommittee on Gas Kinetic Data Evaluation for Atmospheric
Chemistry. July 2005 web version.
http://www.iupac-kinetic.ch.cam.ac.uk/index.html. Docket
EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135

 Sander, S.P., Friedl, R.R., Golden, D.M., Kurylo, M.J., Huie, R.E.,
Orkin, V.L., Moortgat, G.K., Ravishankara, A.R., Kolb, C.E., Molina,
M.J., Finlayson-Pitts, B.J. (2003) Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical
Data for use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation Number 14. NASA Jet
Propulsion Laboratory. http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov/index.html.
Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135

 Finlayson-Pitts BJ, Pitts JN Jr. (1986) Atmospheric Chemistry:
Fundamentals and Experimental Techniques, Wiley, New York.

 Yarwood G, Rao S, Yocke M, Whitten GZ (2005) Updates to the Carbon Bond
Chemical Mechanism: CB05. Final Report to the U.S. EPA, RT-0400675,
December 8, 2005.
http://www.camx.com/publ/pdfs/CB05_Final_Report_120805.pdf.  Docket
EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135

 http://www.cmascenter.org/help/model_docs/cmaq/4.7/RELEASE_NOTES.txt

 77FR 30088 (May 21, 2012)

 US EPA (2012).  National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate
Matter.  http://www.epa.gov/PM/2012/finalrule.pdf

 US EPA (2012).  Fact Sheet: Implementing the Standards.
http://www.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/2012/decfsimp.pdf

 U.S. EPA. (2007). PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard
Implementation Rule (Final).  Washington, DC: U.S. EPA. 72 FR 20586,
April 25, 2007.

 PM Standards Revision – 2006: Timeline.
http://www.epa.gov/PM/naaqsrev2006.html#timeline

 U.S. EPA. (2012).  Fact Sheet – Air Quality Designations for the 2010
Primary Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
http://www.epa.gov/airquality/nitrogenoxides/designations/pdfs/20120120F
S.pdf

  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2012).  Revision to Ambient
Nitrogen Dioxide Monitoring Requirements.  77 FR 64244, October 19,
2012.

 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (2007). Control of Hazardous Air
Pollutants from Mobile Sources; Final Rule.  72 FR 8434, February 26,
2007.

 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (2007). Control of Hazardous Air
Pollutants from Mobile Sources; Final Rule.  72 FR 8434, February 26,
2007.

 U.S. EPA. (2011) 2005 National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment.   HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/n" http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/n ata2005/.
Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135

 U.S. EPA. (2011) Summary of Results for the 2005 National-Scale
Assessment.  http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/nata2005/05pdf/sum_results.pdf.

 Luecken, D,J, Clmorel, A.J. 2008. Codependencies of Reactive Air Toxic
and Criteria Pollutants on Emission Reductions. J. Air & Waste Manage.
Assoc. 58:693–701. DOI:10.3155/1047-32<IP_ADDRESS>3

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2009. Integrated Science
Assessment for Particulate Matter. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Research Triangle Park. EPA/600/R-08/139F

 Trijonis, J.C. et al. 1987. Preliminary extinction budget results from
the RESOLVE program, pp. 872-883. In: P.J. Bhardwaja, et. al. Visibility
Protection Research and Policy Aspects.  Air Pollution Control Assoc.,
Pittsburgh, PA.

 Trijonis, J.C. et al. 1988. RESOLVE Project Final Report: Visibility
conditions and Causes of Visibility Degradation in the Mojave Desert of
California. NWC TP #6869. Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, CA.

 Irving, Patricia M., e.d., 1991. Acid Deposition: State of Science and
Technology, Volume III, Terrestrial, Materials, Health, and Visibility
Effects, The U.S. National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program,
Chapter 24, page 24–76.

 Huai, et al. (2004) Estimates of the emission rates of nitrous oxide
from light-duty vehicles using different chassis dynamometer test cycles
 Atmospheric Environment 6621-6629

 Michaels, H. (1998) Emissions of Nitrous Oxide from Highway Mobile
Sources, U.S. EPA EPA420-R-98-009

 Graham, L. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from 1997-2005 Model Year Light
Duty Vehicles Environment Canada ERMD Report #04-44

 Meffert, et. al (2000) Analysis of Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Light
Duty Passenger Cars, SAE 2000-01-1952

 Behrentz, et al. (2004), Measurements of nitrous oxide emissions from
light-duty motor vehicles: a pilot study  Atmospheric Environment
4291-4303

 Meszler, D. (2004), Light Duty Vehicle Methane and Nitrous Oxide
Emissions: Greenhouse Gas Impacts Study for Northeast States Center for
a Clean Air Future


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12405-12408]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4828]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Approvals and
Disapprovals

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Monthly Notice of PFC Approvals and Disapprovals. In January
2011, there were nine applications approved. Additionally, four
approved amendments to previously approved applications are listed.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA publishes a monthly notice, as appropriate, of PFC
approvals and disapprovals under the provisions of the Aviation Safety
and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101-508) and Part 158 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 158). This notice is
published pursuant to paragraph d of Sec.  158.29.

PFC Applications Approved

    Public Agency: University of Illinois--Willard, Savoy, Illinois.
    Application Number: 11-04-C-00-CMI.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC. PFC LEVEL: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $1,359,105.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: March 1, 2011.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: August 1, 2014.
    Class of Air Carriers not Required To Collect PFC's: Non-scheduled/
on-demand operators filing FAA Form 1800-31.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information submitted in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the approved
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at University of Illinois--Willard Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection at and Use:

Panel repair and replacement taxiway D.
Panel repair and replacement runway 4/22.
General aviation ramp.
Mandatory pavement markings. Airport signage.
Runway guard lights.
Wildlife study.
PFC application development.
Runway deicing equipment.
Security system replacement/upgrade.
Terminal building improvements (Transportation Security Administration
operations).
Water quality improvement (fuel tank equipment).
Part 139 emergency communication equipment (radios).
Airfield vault replacement.
Flight information display system. Airport master plan update.
Reconstruct connector to runway 22 and construct taxiway A and B
improvements (fillets and tapers).
Security improvements (exit lane monitoring).

    Decision Date: January 3, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Wilson, Chicago Airports District
Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: City of LaCrosse, Wisconsin.
    Application Number: 11-09-C-00-LSE.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.

    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $1,271,917.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: March 1, 2013.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: January 1, 2016.
    Class of Air Carriers not Required To Collect PFC's: None.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:

Runway 3/36 reconfiguration.
Mobile Americans with Disabilities Act lift.
Snow removal equipment.
Finger print equipment.
Runway 18/36 pavement maintenance.
Runway 13/31 pavement maintenance.
PFC administration fees.

    Brief Description of Project Partially Approved for Collection and
Use: Commercial terminal building upgrades.
    Determination: Several proposed components were found to be either
ineligible or lacking in justification and, thus, these components did
not meet the requirements of Sec.  158.15 and/or Sec.  158.17(c) and
were disapproved.
    Decision Date: January 3, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tina Young, Great Lakes Region
Airports Division,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: County of Chemung, Horseheads, New York.
    Applications Number: 11-04-C-00-ELM.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $2,635,941.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: October 1, 2015.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: December 1, 2020.
    Class of Air Carriers not Required To Collect PFC's: Nonscheduled/
on-demand air carriers filing FAA Form 1800-31.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information submitted in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the approved
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Elmira Corning Regional Airport.
    Brief Description of Project Approved for Use: Master plan update.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:

Tractor with snow blower and snow plow.
Airport security and access control upgrades--design.
Airport security and access control upgrades--construction.
PFC application, amendments, and administration.

    Brief Description of Withdrawn Projects: Truck--mounted snow
blower.
    Date of Withdrawal: December 29, 2010.
    Land acquisition (Sing Sing Road).
    Date of Withdrawal: December 22, 2010.
    Decision Date: January 4, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Brooks, New York Airports
District office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: Williams Gateway Airport, Mesa, Arizona.
    Application Number: 11-02-C-00-IWA.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $34,555,545.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: February 1, 2013.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: July 1, 2017.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC's: None.
    Brief Description o f Projects Approved for Collection and Use:

Construct taxilane L drainage improvements.
Construct taxiway B, phase IV.
Design west terminal expansion, phase I.
Construct west terminal expansion, phase I.
Construct south apron drainage improvements.
Construct Alpha apron expansion, phase II.
Design/construct west terminal parking expansion, phase I.
Airport geographical information system/electronic airport layout plan.
Design/construct west terminal parking expansion, phase II.
Airport master plan update.
Construct taxiway B, phase II.
Improve building (Hangar 31).
Construct taxiway B, phase III.
Construct Sossaman Road parking lots.
Design/construct airport service road.
Acquire aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicle.
Design/construct west terminal expansion, phase II.
Design/construct west terminal expansion, phase III.

    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection:

Design/construct fuel farm.
Design/reconstruct taxiway P.

    Decision Date: January 5, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darlene Williams, Los Angeles Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: Indian Wells Valley Airport District, Inyokern,
California.
    Application Number: 11-07-U-00-IYK.
    Application Type: Use PFC revenue.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved for Use in This Decision: $309,210.
    Charge Effective Date: March 1, 2009.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: March 1, 2019.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC's: No change from
previous decision.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Use:

Runway 02/20, taxiway, apron, and access road rehabilitation.
Runway 02/20 reconstruction.
Taxiway Al construction.
Runway 15/33 reconstruction.

    Decision Date: January 14, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darlene Williams, Los Angeles Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, Buffalo,
New York.
    Application Number: 10-08-C-00-BUF.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $1,844,244.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: March 1, 2014.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: June 1, 2014.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC's: Air taxi/
commercial operators filing FAA Form 1800-31.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information submitted in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the approved
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Buffalo Niagara International Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use at a
$4.50 PFC Level:

Construction of aircraft rescue and firefighting command control center
upgrades.
Replacement of constant current regulators for airfield lighting
circuits.
Purchase aircraft rescue and firefighting safety equipment.

    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use at a
$3.00 PFC Level:

Replace revolving doors with sliding doors in the passenger terminal.
Update airport master plan.
Performance of wildlife hazard assessment.
Two-tiered roadway pavement rehabilitation.

    Brief Description of Disapproved Project:

PFC planning and program administration.

    Determination: The public agency did not provide adequate
justification for the proposed project. Therefore, the project did not
meet the requirements of Sec.  158.15 and Sec.  158.17.
    Brief Description of Withdrawn Projects:

Installation of low sulfur diesel tank.
Installation of liquid chemical storage tank.

    Date of withdrawal: October 12, 2010.
    Decision Date: January 14, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Brooks, New York Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: Town of Barnstable, Hyannis, Massachusetts.
    Application Number: 11-01-C-00-HYA.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $2.00.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $2,573,600.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: March 1, 2011.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: October 1, 2024.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC's: On-demand air
taxi commercial operators.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information submitted in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the approved
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Barnstable Municipal Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:

New terminal building.
PFC application assistance.

    Decision Date: January 20, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Priscilla Scott, New England Region
Airports Division,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: City of Duluth, Minnesota.
    Application Number: 11-10-C-00-DLH.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $1,639,571.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: November 1, 2011.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: November 1, 2014.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC's: Non-scheduled
air taxi/commercial operators.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information submitted in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the approved
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Duluth International Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:

Preparation of PFC notice of intent.
Construct passenger terminal replacement: terminal building structure
and enclosure (phase 2: bid package 1A).
Construct passenger terminal replacement: terminal building structure
and enclosure (phase 2: bid package 1B).

    Brief Description of Projects Partially Approved for Collection and
Use:

Construct passenger terminal replacement: terminal building structure
and enclosure (phase 2: bid package 2).
Construct passenger terminal replacement: terminal building structure
and enclosure (phase 2: bid package 3).

    Determination: The PFC approved amount for each project was reduced
from that requested. The approved amounts were limited to the amounts
identified in the public agency's air carrier consultation and public
notice processes.
    Decision Date: January 20, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gordon Nelson, Minneapolis Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: Columbus Regional Airport Authority, Columbus, Ohio.
    Applications Number: 10-09-C-00-CMH.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $184,864,011.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: April 1, 2013.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: February 1, 2024.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFC's: Air taxi/
commercial operators when enplaning passengers in service and equipment
reportable to FAA on FAA Form 1800-31.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information submitted in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the approved
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Port Columbus International Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use at a
$3.00 PFC Level:

Checked baggage screening and install new outbound baggage make-up
units.
Replacement of bag claim units 2 thru 5.
Four permanent noise monitoring terminals.
Update pavement management program.
Reimbursement for jet bridges and acquisition and rehabilitation of
additional jet bridges (9-14).
PFC program formulation cost.

    Brief Description of Projects Approved For Collection and Use at a
$4.50 PFC Level:

Storm water detention for Turkey Run.
Acquisition and demolition of properties in new runway protection zone
for replacement runway 10R/28L.
Replacement runway obstruction mitigation.
Airport golf course modifications.
Runway 10R/28L replacement and conversion of existing runway 10R/28L to
a taxiway.
Demolish on-airport structures.
Noise berm/wall.
Residential sound insulation program phase XI (9-13).

    Brief Description of Withdrawn Project: Storm water basin at
Outfall Four.
    Date of withdrawal: January 21, 2011.
    Decision Date: January 28, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gordon Nelson, Minneapolis Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

                                           Amendments to PFC Approvals
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Original         Amended
                                     Amendment       Original         Amended        estimated       estimated
  Amendment number, city, state    approved date   approved net    approved net     charge exp.     charge exp.
                                                    PFC revenue     PFC revenue        date            date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
08-02-C-02-PIE, Clearwater, FL..        12/17/10      $3,323,450      $6,628,510        11/01/11        11/01/12
03-04-C-03-BHM, Birmingham, AL..        01/13/11      $9,924,690      $8,650,171        04/01/07        04/01/07
06-06-C-02-BHM, Birmingham, AL..        01/13/11      $5,600,000      $5,509,101        10/01/08        10/01/08

08-07-C-01-BHM Birmingham, AL...        01/13/11     $15,173,639     $13,682,648        03/01/10        07/01/10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued in Washington, DC on February 23, 2011.
Joe Hebert,
Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger Facility Charge Branch.
[FR Doc. 2011-4828 Filed 3-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69461-69462]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27534]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0350, FRL 9915-93-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; National Listing of Fish Advisories
(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), National Listing of Fish
Advisories, (EPA ICR Number 1959.05, OMB Control Number 2040-0226) to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved
through November 30, 2014. Public comments were previously requested
via the Federal Register (79 FR 33188) on June 10, 2014 during a 60-day
comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public
comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its
estimated burden and cost to the public. An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments must be submitted on or before December 22,
2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OW-2014-0350, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for
EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LCDR Samantha Fontenelle, Office of
Science and Technology, Standards and Health Protection Division, MC-
4305T, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(202) 566-0409; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: The National Listing of Fish Advisories (NLFA) database
contains information on the number of advisories issued by each state,
territory, or tribe annually. The advisory information collected
identifies the waterbody under advisory, the fish or shellfish species
and size ranges included in the advisory, the chemical contaminants and
residue levels causing the advisory to be issued, the waterbody type
(river, lake, estuary, coastal waters), and the target populations to
whom the advisory is directed. This information is collected under the
authority of section 104 of the Clean Water Act, which provides for the
collection of information to be used to protect human health and the
environment. The results of the survey are shared with states,
territories, tribes, other federal agencies, and the general public
through the NLFA database and the distribution of biennial fish
advisory fact sheets. The responses to the survey are voluntary and the
information requested is part of the state public record associated
with the advisories. No confidential business information is requested.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/Affected entities: Entities potentially affected by
this action are Administrators of Public Health and Environmental
Quality Programs in state and tribal governments.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Voluntary (Clean Water Act,
Section 104).
    Estimated number of respondents: 92 total.
    Frequency of response: Annual.
    Total estimated burden: 1,884 labor hours (per year). Burden is
defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $73,116 (per year), which includes $607
annualized operation & maintenance costs. No capital or startup costs
are required.
    Changes in Estimates: There is a decrease of 1,452 hours in the
total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently
approved by OMB. This decrease is due to a change in program
requirements (i.e., the elimination of the State Fish Advisory Program
Questionnaire).

Courtney Kerwin,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-27534 Filed 11-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4268-4271]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01618]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2022-0002]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: New or modified Base (1-percent annual chance) Flood
Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)
boundaries or zone designations, and/or regulatory floodways
(hereinafter referred to as flood hazard determinations) as shown on
the indicated Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) for each of the communities
listed in the table below are finalized. Each LOMR revises the Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and in some cases the Flood Insurance
Study (FIS) reports, currently in effect for the listed communities.

DATES: Each LOMR was finalized as in the table below.

ADDRESSES: Each LOMR is available for inspection at both the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the table below and online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) makes the final flood hazard determinations as shown in the
LOMRs for each community listed in the table below. Notice of these
modified flood hazard determinations has been published in newspapers
of local circulation and 90 days have elapsed since that publication.
The Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation has
resolved any appeals resulting from this notification.
    The modified flood hazard determinations are made pursuant to
section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4105, and are in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of
1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., and with 44 CFR part 65. The currently
effective community number is shown and must be used for all new
policies and renewals.
    The new or modified flood hazard information is the basis for the
floodplain management measures that the community is required either to
adopt or to show evidence of being already in effect in order to remain
qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
    This new or modified flood hazard information, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities.
    This new or modified flood hazard determinations are used to meet
the floodplain management requirements of the NFIP. The changes in
flood hazard determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    Interested lessees and owners of real property are encouraged to
review the final flood hazard information available at the address
cited below for each community or online through the FEMA Map Service
Center at https://msc.fema.gov.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      Location and case    Chief executive officer of                                                                         Community
  State and county           No.                    community                 Community map repository             Date of modification          No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama:
    Lee (FEMA        City of Opelika (21- The Honorable Gary Fuller,    Department of Public Works, 700 Fox   Dec. 22, 2021................       010145
     Docket No.: B-   04-1315P).           Mayor, City of Opelika,       Trail, Opelika, AL 36803.
     2175).                                P.O. Box 390, Opelika, AL
                                           36803.
    Mobile (FEMA     City of Mobile (21-  The Honorable William         Mobile City Clerk's Office, 205       Dec. 30, 2021................       015007
     Docket No.: B-   04-1400P).           Stimpson, Mayor, City of      Government Street, Mobile, AL
     2175).                                Mobile, P.O. Box 1827,        36602.
                                           Mobile, AL 36633.
    Morgan (FEMA     Town of Priceville   The Honorable Sam Heflin,     Morgan County Engineer's Office, 580  Dec. 30, 2021................       010448
     Docket No.: B-   (20-04-3422P).       Mayor, Town of Priceville,    Shull Road, Hartselle, AL 35640.
     2175).                                242 Marco Drive,
                                           Priceville, AL 35603.

    Morgan (FEMA     Unincorporated       The Honorable Ray Long,       Morgan County Engineer's Office, 580  Dec. 30, 2021................       010175
     Docket No.: B-   areas of Morgan      Chairman, Morgan County       Shull Road, Hartselle, AL 35640.
     2175).           County (20-04-       Commission, 302 Lee Street
                      3422P).              Northeast, Decatur, AL
                                           35601.
Colorado: Denver     City and County of   The Honorable Michael B.      Department of Public Works, 201 West  Dec. 3, 2021.................       080046
 (FEMA Docket No.:    Denver (21-08-       Hancock, Mayor, City and      Colfax Avenue, Denver, CO 80202.
 B-2161).             0769X).              County of Denver, 1437
                                           Bannock Street, Room 350,
                                           Denver, CO 80202.
Delaware: Sussex     City of Rehoboth     The Honorable Stan Mills,     Building and Licensing Department,    Dec. 13, 2021................       105086
 (FEMA Docket No.:    Beach (21-03-        Mayor, City of Rehoboth       229 Rehoboth Avenue, Rehoboth
 B-2164).             0968P).              Beach, 229 Rehoboth Avenue,   Beach, DE 19971.
                                           Rehoboth Beach, DE 19971.
Florida:
    Alachua (FEMA    City of Gainesville  The Honorable Lauren Poe,     City Hall, 200 East University        Dec. 1, 2021.................       125107
     Docket No.: B-   (21-04-1261P).       Mayor, City of Gainesville,   Avenue, Gainesville, FL 32601.
     2161).                                200 East University Avenue,
                                           Gainesville, FL 32601.
    Alachua (FEMA    Unincorporated       Ms. Michele L. Lieberman,     Alachua County Public Works           Dec. 1, 2021.................       120001
     Docket No.: B-   areas of Alachua     Manager, Alachua County, 12   Department, 5620 Northwest 120th
     2161).           County (21-04-       South East 1st Street,        Lane, Gainesville, FL 32653.
                      1261P).              Gainesville, FL 32601.
    Hillsborough     Unincorporated       Ms. Bonnie Wise,              Hillsborough Public Works             Dec. 2, 2021.................       120112
     (FEMA Docket     areas of             Hillsborough County           Department, 601 East Kennedy
     No.: B-2161).    Hillsborough         Administrator, 601 East       Boulevard, 22nd Floor, Tampa, FL
                      County (21-04-       Kennedy Boulevard, 26th       33602.
                      0492P).              Floor, Tampa, FL 33602.
    Pasco (FEMA      City of Zephyrhills  The Honorable Gene            City Hall, 5335 8th Street,           Dec. 16, 2021................       120235
     Docket No.: B-   (20-04-6053P).       Whitfield, Mayor, City of     Zephyrhills, FL 33542.
     2164).                                Zephyrhills, 5335 8th
                                           Street, Zephyrhills, FL
                                           33542.
    Polk (FEMA       Unincorporated       Mr. Bill Beasley, Polk        Polk County Floodplain Department,    Dec. 9, 2021.................       120261
     Docket No.: B-   areas of Polk        County Manager, 330 West      330 West Church Street, Bartow, FL
     2161).           County (21-04-       Church Street, Bartow, FL     33830.
                      3382P).              33830.
    Sarasota (FEMA   Unincorporated       The Honorable Alan Maio,      Sarasota County Planning and          Dec. 13, 2021................       125144
     Docket No.: B-   areas of Sarasota    Chairman, Sarasota County     Development Services Department,
     2164).           County (21-04-       Board of Commissioners,       1001 Sarasota Center Boulevard,
                      3579P).              1660 Ringling Boulevard,      Sarasota, FL 34240.
                                           Sarasota, FL 34236.
    Sumter (FEMA     City of Wildwood     Mr. Jason F. McHugh,          City Hall, 100 North Main Street,     Dec. 10, 2021................       120299
     Docket No.: B-   (20-04-3810P).       Manager, City of Wildwood,    Wildwood, FL 34785.
     2164).                                100 North Main Street,
                                           Wildwood, FL 34785.
    Sumter (FEMA     City of Wildwood     Mr. Jason F. McHugh,          City Hall, 100 North Main Street,     Dec. 10, 2021................       120299
     Docket No.: B-   (21-04-1158P).       Manager, City of Wildwood,    Wildwood, FL 34785.
     2164).                                100 North Main Street,
                                           Wildwood, FL 34785.
    Sumter (FEMA     Unincorporated       The Honorable Garry Breeden,  Sumter County Service Center, 7375    Dec. 10, 2021................       120296
     Docket No.: B-   areas of Sumter      Chairman, Sumter County       Powell Road, Wildwood, FL 34785.
     2164).           County (20-04-       Board of Commissioners,
                      3810P).              7375 Powell Road, Wildwood,
                                           FL 34785.
    Sumter (FEMA     Unincorporated       The Honorable Garry Breeden,  Sumter County Service Center, 7375    Dec. 10, 2021................       120296
     Docket No.: B-   areas of Sumter      Chairman, Sumter County       Powell Road, Wildwood, FL 34785.
     2164).           County (21-04-       Board of Commissioners,
                      1158P).              7375 Powell Road, Wildwood,
                                           FL 34785.
Massachusetts:

    Bristol (FEMA    Town of Dartmouth    Mr. Shawn MacInnes, Town of   Town Hall, 400 Slocum Road,           Dec. 2, 2021.................       250051
     Docket No.: B-   (21-01-0847P).       Dartmouth Administrator,      Dartmouth, MA 02747.
     2161).                                400 Slocum Road, Dartmouth,
                                           MA 02747.
    Middlesex (FEMA  City of Waltham (20- The Honorable Jeannette A.    City Hall, 610 Main Street, Waltham,  Dec. 3, 2021.................       250222
     Docket No.: B-   01-1644P).           McCarthy, Mayor, City of      MA 02452.
     2161).                                Waltham, 610 Main Street,
                                           2nd Floor, Waltham, MA
                                           02452.
    Middlesex (FEMA  Town of Belmont (20- The Honorable Adam Dash,      Community Development Department, 19  Dec. 3, 2021.................       250182
     Docket No.: B-   01-1644P).           Chairman, Town of Belmont     Moore Street, Belmont, MA 02478.
     2161).                                Select Board, 455 Concord
                                           Avenue, 2nd Floor, Belmont,
                                           MA 02478.
North Dakota: Cass   City of Harwood (21- The Honorable Blake Hankey,   City Hall, 108 Main Street, Harwood,  Dec. 2, 2021.................       380338
 (FEMA Docket No.:    08-0691X).           Mayor, City of Harwood, 108   ND 58042.
 B-2171).                                  Main Street, Harwood, ND
                                           58042.
Pennsylvania:
    Cumberland       Borough of           The Honorable Jack Ritter,    Borough Hall, 36 West Allen Street,   Dec. 3, 2021.................       420362
     (FEMA Docket     Mechanicsburg (21-   Mayor, Borough of             Mechanicsburg, PA 17055.
     No.: B-2161).    03-0690P).           Mechanicsburg, 36 West
                                           Allen Street,
                                           Mechanicsburg, PA 17055.
    Cumberland       Township of Upper    The Honorable Kenneth M.      Township Hall, 100 Gettysburg Pike,   Dec. 3, 2021.................       420372
     (FEMA Docket     Allen (21-03-        Martin, President, Township   Mechanicsburg, PA 17055.
     No.: B-2161).    0690P).              of Upper Allen Board of
                                           Commissioners, 100
                                           Gettysburg Pike,
                                           Mechanicsburg, PA 17055.
Texas:
    Angelina (FEMA   City of Lufkin (20-  The Honorable Mark Hicks,     Engineering Services Department, 300  Dec. 9, 2021.................       480009
     Docket No.: B-   06-3596P).           Mayor, City of Lufkin, 300    East Shepherd Avenue, Lufkin, TX
     2161).                                East Shepherd Avenue,         75901.
                                           Lufkin, TX 75901.
    Denton and       City of Fort Worth   The Honorable Mattie Parker,  Transportation and Public Works       Dec. 3, 2021.................       480596
     Tarrant (FEMA    (21-06-1349P).       Mayor, City of Fort Worth,    Department, Engineering Vault, 200
     Docket No.: B-                        200 Texas Street, Fort        Texas Street, Fort Worth, TX 76102.
     2171).                                Worth, TX 76102.
    Denton (FEMA     City of Lewisville   The Honorable T.J. Gilmore,   Engineering Department, 151 West      Dec. 13, 2021................       480195
     Docket No.: B-   (21-06-1150P).       Mayor, City of Lewisville,    Church Street, Lewisville, TX
     2161).                                P.O. Box 299002,              75057.
                                           Lewisville, TX 75029.
    Harris (FEMA     Unincorporated       The Honorable Lina Hidalgo,   Harris County Permit Office, 10555    Dec. 13, 2021................       480287
     Docket No.: B-   areas of Harris      Harris County Judge, 1001     Northwest Freeway, Suite 120,
     2171).           County (21-06-       Preston Street, Suite 911,    Houston, TX 77092.
                      0685P).              Houston, TX 77002.
    Tarrant (FEMA    City of Arlington    The Honorable Jim Ross,       Public Works and Transportation       Dec. 3, 2021.................       485454
     Docket No.: B-   (20-06-3516P).       Mayor, City of Arlington,     Department, 101 West Abram Street,
     2171).                                P.O. Box 90231, Arlington,    Arlington, TX 76010.
                                           TX 76004.
    Tarrant (FEMA    City of Fort Worth   The Honorable Mattie Parker,  Transportation and Public Works       Dec. 3, 2021.................       480596
     Docket No.: B-   (20-06-3516P).       Mayor, City of Fort Worth,    Department, Engineering Vault, 200
     2171).                                200 Texas Street, Fort        Texas Street, Fort Worth, TX 76102.
                                           Worth, TX 76102.
Virginia:
    Fairfax (FEMA    City of Alexandria   The Honorable Justin M.       City Hall, 301 King Street, Room      Dec. 13, 2021................       515519
     Docket No.: B-   (21-03-0303P).       Wilson, Mayor, City of        4200, Alexandria, VA 22314.
     2164).                                Alexandria, 301 King
                                           Street, Room 2300,
                                           Alexandria, VA 22314.

    Fairfax (FEMA    Unincorporated       The Honorable Jeffrey C.      Fairfax County Department of Public   Dec. 13, 2021................       515525
     Docket No.: B-   areas of Fairfax     McKay, Chairman At-Large,     Works and Environmental Services,
     2164).           County (21-03-       Fairfax County Board of       12000 Government Center Parkway,
                      0303P).              Supervisors, 12000            Fairfax, VA 22035.
                                           Government Center Parkway,
                                           Suite 530, Fairfax, VA
                                           22035.
    Independence     City of Lynchburg    Mr. Reid A. Wodicka, Interim  City Hall, 900 Church Street,         Dec. 13, 2021................       510093
     City (FEMA       (21-03-0004P).       Manager, City of Lynchburg,   Lynchburg, VA 24504.
     Docket No.: B-                        900 Church Street,
     2164).                                Lynchburg, VA 24504.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-01618 Filed 1-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P