[Federal Register: June 26, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 124)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 36288-36290]
[DOCID:fr26jn08-15]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-27715; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-140-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330 and A340 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of
comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is revising an earlier supplemental NPRM (SNPRM) for
an airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all Airbus Model A330-
200, A330-300, A340-200, and A340-300 series airplanes; and Model A340-
541 and A340-642 airplanes. The original NPRM would have superseded an
existing AD that currently requires operators to revise the
Airworthiness Limitations section (ALS) of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness (ICA) to incorporate new information. This
information includes, for all affected airplanes, decreased life limit
values for certain components; and for Model A330-200 and -300 series
airplanes, new inspections, compliance times, and new repetitive
intervals to detect fatigue cracking, accidental damage, or corrosion
in certain structures. The original NPRM proposed to revise the ALS,
for all affected airplanes, by adding new Airworthiness Limitations
Items (ALIs) to incorporate service life limits for certain items and
inspections to detect fatigue cracking, accidental damage or corrosion
in certain structures, in accordance with the revised ALS of the ICA.
The original NPRM resulted from the issuance of new and more
restrictive service life limits and structural inspections based on
fatigue testing and in-service findings. The first supplemental NPRM
revised the original NPRM by adding airplanes, adding new requirements,
and including more restrictive compliance thresholds and intervals.
This new action revises the first supplemental NPRM by adding a new
weight variant configuration, and including more restrictive compliance
thresholds and intervals. We are proposing this second supplemental
NPRM to detect and correct fatigue cracking, accidental damage, or
corrosion in principal structural elements, and to prevent failure of
certain life-limited parts, which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this supplemental NPRM by July 21,
2008.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
     DOT Docket Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and
follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Hand Delivery: Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France, for service information identified in this proposed AD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Backman, Aerospace Engineer
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, International Branch, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-
4056; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposal. Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``Docket No.
FAA-2007-27715; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-140-AD'' at the
beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this
supplemental NPRM. We will

consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
supplemental NPRM in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments submitted, without change, to http://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
may visit http://dms.dot.gov.

Examining the Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is located on the
ground level of the West Building at the DOT street address stated in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after the Docket Management System receives them.

Discussion

    We proposed to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations
(14 CFR part 39) with a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that supersedes AD
2006-09-07, amendment 39-14577 (71 FR 25919, May 3, 2006). The existing
AD applies to all Airbus Model A330-200, A330-300, A340-200, and A340-
300 series airplanes; and Model A340-541 and A340-642 airplanes. The
first supplemental NPRM was published in the Federal Register on August
16, 2007 (72 FR 45965). The original NPRM proposed to revise the ALS,
for all affected airplanes, by adding new Airworthiness Limitations
Items (ALIs) to incorporate service life limits for certain items and
inspections to detect fatigue cracking, accidental damage, or corrosion
in certain structures, in accordance with the revised ALS of the
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA). The first supplemental
NPRM proposed to add airplanes, add new requirements, and include more
restrictive compliance thresholds and intervals.

Actions Since First Supplemental NPRM Was Issued

    Since we issued the first supplemental NPRM, the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member
States of the European Community, issued EASA airworthiness directive
2008-0023, dated February 6, 2008.
    The EASA advises that Airbus has revised Document AI/SE-M4/
95A.0089/97, ``A330 Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALI),'' from Issue
14, dated October 10, 2005, to Issue 15, dated March 26, 2007, to add a
new weight variant configuration and include more restrictive
compliance thresholds and intervals.
    Incorporating this revision into the ALS of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness is intended to ensure the continued structural
integrity of these airplanes.

Explanation of Additional Changes to the First Supplemental NPRM

    For standardization purposes, we have revised this AD in the
following ways:
    We have revised paragraph (i) of this AD to specify that no
alternative inspections/limitation tasks or inspection/limitation task
intervals may be used unless the inspections/limitation tasks or
inspection/limitation task intervals are part of a later approved
revision of the documents specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of
this AD, as applicable, or unless they are approved as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC). Inclusion of this paragraph in the AD is
intended to ensure that the AD-mandated airworthiness limitations
changes are treated the same as the airworthiness limitations issued
with the original type certificate.
    We have simplified the language in Note 1 of this AD to clarify
that an operator must request approval for an AMOC if the operator
cannot accomplish the required inspections because an airplane has been
previously modified, altered, or repaired in the areas addressed by the
required inspections.

FAA's Determination and Proposed Requirements of the Supplemental NPRM

    The changes discussed above expand the scope of the first
supplemental NPRM; therefore, we have determined that it is necessary
to reopen the comment period to provide additional opportunity for
public comment on this second supplemental NPRM.

Costs of Compliance

    This proposed AD would affect about 41 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this proposed AD.

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of U.S.-
                  Action                      Work hour     Average labor              Parts                 Cost per       registered      Fleet cost
                                                            rate per hour                                    airplane        airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revise the ALS, required by AD 2006-09-07               1             $80  None.........................             $80              20          $1,600
Revise the ALS, new proposed action......               1              80  None.........................              80              41           3,280
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this supplemental NPRM and placed it in the AD docket. See
the ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec.  39.13 by
removing amendment 39-14577 (71 FR 25919, May 3, 2006) and adding the
following new airworthiness directive (AD):

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2007-27715; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-
140-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by July 28,
2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2006-09-07.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all Airbus Model A330 and A340 airplanes,
certificated in any category.

    Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance according
to paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the airplane.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from the issuance of new and more
restrictive service life limits and structural inspections based on
fatigue testing and in-service findings. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct fatigue cracking, accidental damage, or corrosion
in principal structural elements, which could result in reduced
structural integrity of the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2006-09-07

Airworthiness Limitations Revision

    (f) Within 3 months after June 7, 2006 (the effective date of AD
2006-09-07): Revise the Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) of
the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness by incorporating into
the ALS the documents in paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this AD, as
applicable, until paragraph (h) of this AD is accomplished.
    (1) Airbus Document AI/SE-M4/95A.0089/97, ``A330 Airworthiness
Limitations Items,'' Issue 12, dated November 1, 2003, as specified
in Section 9-2 of the Airbus A330 Maintenance Planning Document
(MPD).
    (2) Section 9-1, ``Life limits/Monitored parts,'' Revision 05,
dated April 7, 2005, of the Airbus A330 and A340 MPDs.
    (g) Except as provided by paragraph (h) or (j) of this AD: After
the actions in paragraph (f) of this AD have been accomplished, no
alternative inspections or inspection intervals may be approved for
the structural elements specified in the documents listed in
paragraph (f) of this AD.

New Requirements of This AD

ALS Revision

    (h) Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD: Revise
the ALS of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to
incorporate the documents specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2)
of this AD, as applicable. Accomplishing the revision in this
paragraph terminates the requirements in paragraph (f) of this AD.
    (1) Airbus Document AI/SE-M4/95A.0089/97, ``A330 Airworthiness
Limitation Items (ALI),'' Issue 15, dated March 26, 2007; or Airbus
Document AI/SE-M4/95A.0051/97, ``A340 Airworthiness Limitations
Items,'' Issue 10, dated February 1, 2007.
    (2) Sub-part 1-2 ``Life Limits,'' and Sub-part 1-3
``Demonstrated Fatigue Lives,'' of Airbus A330 or A340 ALS Part 1,
``Safe Life Airworthiness Limitation Items,'' Revision 01, dated
March 30, 2007, as applicable.
    (i) After accomplishing the actions specified in paragraph (h)
of this AD, no alternative inspections/limitation tasks or
inspection/limitation task intervals may be used unless the
inspections/limitation tasks or inspection/limitation task intervals
are part of a later approved revision of the documents specified in
paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD, as applicable, that is
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or unless the inspection/limitation task
or inspection/limitation task interval is approved as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (j)(1) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.

Related Information

    (k) European Aviation Safety Agency airworthiness directives
2008-0023, dated February 6, 2008, 2007-0133, dated May 11, 2007,
and 2007-0158, dated June 4, 2007; also address the subject of this
AD.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 13, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-14480 Filed 6-25-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 151 (Monday, August 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48177-48178]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16919]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP17-913-007.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: NGPL Fuel Transparency Report
Informational Filing 2022 to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5115.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/15/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-525-006.
    Applicants: Midwestern Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Refund Report: Refund Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5104.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-501-002.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: ANR Section 4 Rate Case Compliance
RP22-501 to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5023.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/10/22.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR22-57-000.
    Applicants: Black Hills/Kansas Gas Utility Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  284.123 Rate Filing: BHKG Revised Statement of
Rates to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5205.
    Comments/Protest Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1081-000.
    Applicants: Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: FLU_EPC Recomputation Update
Filing to be effective 9/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5082.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1082-000.
    Applicants: MountainWest Overthrust Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Annual Fuel Gas Reimbursement Report of MountainWest
Overthrust Pipeline, LLC Company under RP22-1082.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5086.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1083-000.
    Applicants: Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 2022 Housekeeping to be
effective 9/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5090.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1084-000.
    Applicants: Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Non-Conforming Agreement
Update (Anadarko) to be effective 9/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5103.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1085-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Neg Rate NC Service
Amendment--Kaiser 174463(3) to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1086-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: TPC 2022-07-29 Negotiated Rate
Agreement to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5179.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1087-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: REX 2022-07-29 Negotiated Rate
Agreement to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5180.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1088-000.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 20220729 Negotiated Rate to be
effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5201.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1089-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Cherokee
AGL--Replacement Shippers--Aug 2022 to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5225.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1090-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Capacity
Release Agreements--8/1/2022 to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5030.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/15/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1091-000.
    Applicants: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Various Aug
1 2022 Releases to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5034.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/15/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1092-000.
    Applicants: NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Various
Releases eff 8-1-2022 to be effective 8/1/2022.

    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5087.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/15/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1093-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Remove Terminated Agreement--
8/31/2022 to be effective 9/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5109.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/15/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1094-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Various
Releases eff 8-1-22 to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5114.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/15/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1095-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Limited Section 4 to Adjust
Fuel Gas and L&U Retention Factors 2022 to be effective 9/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5116.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/15/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1096-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Filing-ConocoPhillips Company to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5119.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/15/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1097-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Filing-Morgan Stanley Capital to be effective 9/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5122.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/15/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1098-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt (Osaka
46429 to Spotlight 55496) to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5139.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/15/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1099-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Update (Conoco August 1 2022) to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5159.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/15/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1100-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt (JayBee
34447 to MacQuarie 53800) to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5163.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/15/22.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 2, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-16919 Filed 8-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27825-27827]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11368]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-66936; File No. SR-ICEEU-2012-06]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Europe Limited; Notice
of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule
Change to Membership Qualifications for CDS Clearing Members That Are
Us CDS Clearing Members

May 7, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 5, 2012, ICE Clear Europe Limited (``ICEEU'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been
prepared primarily by ICEEU. The Commission is publishing this Notice
and Order to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons and to approve the proposed rule change on an
accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    ICEEU proposes to conform the ICEEU membership qualifications with
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC'') Regulations
39.12(a)(2)(ii) and 39.12(a)(2)(iii) no later than the May 7, 2012,
effective date of CFTC Regulations 39.12(a)(2)(ii) and
39.12(a)(2)(iii).
    As discussed in more detail in Item II(A) below, the changes to
Parts 1 and 2 of the ICEEU CDS Procedures provide for amendments to the
membership qualifications for US credit default swap (``CDS'') clearing
members.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, ICEEU included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any

comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the places specified in Item III below.
ICEEU has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B), and (C)
below, of the most significant aspects of these statements.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries
prepared by ICEEU.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    ICEEU is registered as a derivatives clearing organization
(``DCO'') with the CFTC and clears CDS contracts subject to the
jurisdiction of the CFTC. CFTC Regulation 39.12(a)(2)(ii) provides that
``the participant requirements shall set forth capital requirements
that are based on objective, transparent, and commonly accepted
standards that appropriately match capital to risk. Capital
requirements shall be scalable to the risks posed by clearing
members.'' Accordingly, ICEEU proposes to revise its CDS Procedures 2.6
to provide that, if at any time and for so long as a CDS Clearing
Member that is an FCM has a required contribution to the ICEEU CDS
guaranty fund that exceeds 25% of its ``excess net capital'', ICEEU may
(in addition to other rights) require such US CDS Clearing Member to
provide additional margin and/or prepay and maintain with ICEEU an
amount up to the US CDS Clearing Member's CDS guaranty fund assessment
obligation. ICEEU CDS Procedures 1.1 (Additional Definitions), the
definitional section of ICEEU's Rules, would be amended to define
``excess net capital'' as the amount reported on Form 1-FR-FCM or FOCUS
Report or as otherwise reported to the CFTC under CFTC Rule 1.12 (or an
equivalent amount for US CDS Clearing Members that are not futures
commission merchants).
    CFTC Regulation 39.12(a)(2)(iii) provides that ``a derivatives
clearing organization shall not set a minimum capital requirement of
more than $50 million for any person that seeks to become a clearing
member in order to clear swaps.'' Accordingly, ICEEU proposes to revise
CDS Procedure 2.2(b) to incorporate the CFTC mandated $50 million
minimum adjusted net capital requirement for US CDS clearing members.
ICEEU proposes to define the term ``US CDS Clearing Member'' to mean
``a CDS Clearing Member or applicant that would become a CDS Clearing
Member that is (i) an FCM or (ii) any other Person organised or
incorporated under the laws of the United States of America or a state
thereof.'' ICEEU also proposes to amend CDS Procedure 2.2(b)(ii) and
(iii) to eliminate references to external credit ratings as part of the
membership qualifications for US CDS Clearing Members. In addition, CDS
Procedure 2.2(b)(iv) would be added which states one additional
membership qualification for US CDS clearing members. It requires that
the US CDS Clearing Member be regulated ``for capital adequacy (the
``Regulatory Capital Requirement'') by a competent authority such as
the FSA, CFTC, SEC, Banque de France, Bundesbank, Bundesanstalt
f[uuml]r Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, Swiss Federal Banking
Commission, U.S. Federal Reserve Board, U.S. Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency, or any other Regulatory Authority the Clearing House
designates from time to time for this purpose, or it is an Affiliate of
an entity that satisfies the Regulatory Capital Requirement and is
subject to consolidated holding company group supervision.''
    Further, CDS Procedure 2.7 would be added to clarify that a ``US
CDS Clearing Member that is not an FCM Clearing Member shall provide to
the Clearing House a copy of such forms as the Clearing House may
determine to be necessary on a comparable schedule to that which an FCM
Clearing Member would be required to follow in filing such forms with
its Regulatory Authorities.''
    ICEEU argues that the proposed rule changes are consistent with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act and the regulations thereunder
applicable to it and that the proposed membership requirements will
comply with the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.

(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    ICEEU does not believe the proposed rule change would have any
impact, or impose any burden, on competition.

(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been
solicited or received. ICEEU represented that it will notify the
Commission of any written comments it receives.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
     Electronic comments may be submitted by using the
Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml)
or by sending an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include File
Number SR-ICEEU-2012-06 on the subject line.
     Paper comments may be sent in triplicate to Elizabeth M.
Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICEEU-2012-06. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of ICEEU
and on ICEEU's Web site at https://www.theice.com/notices/Notices.shtml?regulatoryFilings.
    All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICEEU-2012-06
and should be submitted on or before June 1, 2012.

IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
Proposed Rule Change

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \4\ directs the Commission to
approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it
finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the

rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such organization.
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \5\ requires, among other things, that
the rules of a clearing agency be designed to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions, and to
the extent applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and
transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed change would allow ICEEU to expand the base of
potential clearing members by lowering the net capital threshold for
membership, thereby promoting the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions, and derivative agreements,
contracts, and transactions. It would also allow ICEEU to comply with
new CFTC regulatory requirements, thereby promoting the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of derivative agreements, contracts,
and transactions.
    Further, the Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,\6\ for approving the proposed rule change prior to
the 30th day after the date of publication of notice in the Federal
Register because, as a registered DCO, ICEEU is required to comply with
the new CFTC regulations by the time they become effective on May 7,
2012.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \7\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to 19(b)(2) of the Act,\8\ that
the proposed rule change (SR-ICEEU-2012-06) is approved on an
accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-11368 Filed 5-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 121 (Monday, June 24, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 29513]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13346]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2839-000]

Village of Lyndonville Electric Department; Notice of
Authorization for Continued Project Operation

    On May 26, 2017, the Village of Lyndonville Electric Department,
licensee for the Great Falls Hydroelectric Project, filed an
Application for a New License pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA)
and the Commission's regulations thereunder. The Great Falls
Hydroelectric Project is located on the Passumpsic River, in the Town
of Lyndonville, Caledonia County, Vermont.
    The license for Project No. 2839 was issued for a period ending May
31, 2019. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires
the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from
year-to-year an annual license to the then licensee under the terms and
conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the
project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other
applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior license waived
the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b)
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth
at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the
Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project
has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations
until the Commission issues someone else a license for the project or
otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 2839 is issued to
the licensee for a period effective June 1, 2019 through May 31, 2020,
or until the issuance of a new license for the project or other
disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If issuance of a new
license (or other disposition) does not take place on or before May 31,
2020, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.18(c), an
annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is renewed
automatically without further order or notice by the Commission, unless
the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is
hereby given that the licensee, Village of Lyndonville Electric
Department, is authorized to continue operation of the Great Falls
Hydroelectric Project until such time as the Commission acts on its
application for a subsequent license.

    Dated: June 18, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-13346 Filed 6-21-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 219 (Monday, November 14, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70337-70340]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29357]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Parts 738, 740 and 748

[Docket No. 110818514-1531-01]
RIN 0694-AF33

Exports and Reexports to the Principality of Liechtenstein

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) publishes this final
rule to amend certain requirements in the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR) that apply to the Principality of Liechtenstein
(Liechtenstein). In this final rule, BIS aligns license requirements
and licensing policy under the EAR for Liechtenstein with those for
Switzerland. As a result, for purposes of the EAR, Liechtenstein will
be treated the same as Switzerland.
    By virtue of a Customs Union Treaty with Switzerland, Liechtenstein
has

adopted the export controls implemented under Swiss law, including
controls equivalent to those prescribed under multilateral regimes, and
has authorized Switzerland to administer and enforce export controls
within Liechtenstein's territory. As a result of this arrangement,
Liechtenstein and Switzerland serve as one territory for customs and
export purposes. Having recently been made aware of the full scope of
this arrangement and its consequences on export controls, BIS has
determined that it is appropriate to codify the treatment of
Liechtenstein and Switzerland as one territory for purposes of the EAR.
This treatment of Liechtenstein is consistent with the effort of the
United States to streamline licensing requirements where export
controls prescribed by the multilateral regimes are implemented.

DATES: This rule is effective November 14, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sheila Quarterman, Regulatory Policy
Division, Office of Exporter Services, Bureau of Industry and Security,
U.S. Department of Commerce at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    By virtue of a Customs Union Treaty with Switzerland, Liechtenstein
has adopted the export controls implemented under Swiss law, and has
authorized Switzerland to administer and enforce export controls within
Liechtenstein's territory. The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
recognizes that this arrangement results in the implementation of
export controls in Liechtenstein that are equivalent to those in
Switzerland, and in accordance with the multilateral export control
regimes. By virtue of the Customs Union Treaty of 1923 between
Switzerland and Liechtenstein (Customs Union Treaty),\1\ Liechtenstein
is a part of the ``Swiss customs territory'' and Switzerland acts on
behalf of Liechtenstein regarding issues of trade in goods. The Customs
Union Treaty empowers Switzerland to conclude and incur undertakings
that apply automatically and directly to Liechtenstein. As a result of
this arrangement, Swiss export control law applies equally to exporters
from Switzerland and Liechtenstein. Further, Switzerland is responsible
for administering export controls and enforcing export controls in
Liechtenstein. Consequently, in this final rule, BIS aligns its
treatment of Liechtenstein with that of Switzerland, resulting in the
treatment of Liechtenstein and Switzerland as one territory for
purposes of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). Therefore,
license requirements and licensing policy under the EAR for
Liechtenstein are effectively the same as those for Switzerland. This
treatment of Liechtenstein is consistent with the effort of the United
States to streamline licensing requirements where export controls
prescribed by the multilateral regimes are implemented.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Customs Union Treaty of 29 March 1923 between the
Principality of Liechtenstein and Switzerland, 21 League of Nations
Treaty Series 233 (1924).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Specific Amendments to the EAR That Align Liechtenstein With
Switzerland for Purposes of Licensing Requirements

    In this rule, BIS amends the EAR by adding a sentence to paragraph
(b) (Countries) of Section 738.3 (Commerce Country Chart Structure)
that states that Liechtenstein, which serves as one territory with
Switzerland for customs and export purposes, will be accorded the same
licensing treatment as Switzerland under the EAR.
    In addition and consistent with the purpose of this rule, BIS
amends the EAR by adding a footnote for ``Liechtenstein'' on the
Commerce Country Chart in Supplement No. 1 to Part 738 that states,
``Refer to Switzerland for licensing requirements for Liechtenstein
under the EAR.''; and by removing the ``X'' in chemical and biological
weapons column 2, nuclear nonproliferation column 1, national security
column 2, and regional stability column 2. BIS also amends the EAR by
removing Liechtenstein from the group of Computer Tier 1 Destinations
in paragraph (c)(1) of Section 740.7 (License Exception Computers
(APP)); Country Group B in Supplement No. 1 to Part 740; the group of
countries for which an Import Certificate or End-User Statement may be
required in paragraph (b)(2) of Section 748.9 (Support Documents for
License Applications); and the Authorities Administering Import
Certificate/Delivery Verification and End-User Statement Systems in
Foreign Countries in Supplement No. 4 to part 748. Finally, in this
rule, BIS removes and reserves paragraph (g), which expressly permitted
reexports between Liechtenstein and Switzerland, in License Exception
Additional Permissive Reexports (APR).
    Since August 21, 2001, the Export Administration Act (the Act) has
been in lapse and the President, through Executive Order 13222 of
August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002)), as extended most
recently by the Notice of August 12, 2011, 76 FR 50661 (August 16,
2011), has continued the EAR in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to carry out the
provisions of the Act, as appropriate and to the extent permitted by
law, pursuant to Executive Order 13222.

Rulemaking Requirements

    1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been designated a ``significant regulatory
action'' although not economically significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
    2. Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person is
required to respond to nor be subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with a collection of information, subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB
Control Number. This rule involves two collections of information
subject to the PRA. This collection has been approved by OMB under
control number 0694-0088, ``Multi-Purpose Application,'' which carries
a burden hour estimate of 43.8 minutes to prepare and submit form BIS-
748. The other collection has been approved by OMB under control number
0694-0106, ``Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements under the
Wassenaar Arrangement,'' and carries a burden hour estimate of 21
minutes for a manual or electronic submission. Total burden hours
associated with the PRA and OMB control numbers 0694-0088 and 0694-0106
are not expected to increase as a result of this rule.
    3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined under Executive Order 13132.
    4. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1), the provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act requiring notice of proposed rulemaking,
the opportunity for public participation, and a delay in effective
date, are inapplicable because this regulation involves a military or

foreign affairs function of the United States. (See 5 U.S.C.
553(a)(1)). Immediate implementation of these amendments furthers
United States policies and goals toward allies and cooperating and
like-minded countries with regard to export controls and reduces the
burden on exporters in relation to licensing obligations. This rule
will positively impact regional stability by promoting greater
responsibility in the transfer of dual-use goods, technologies, thus
preventing destabilizing effects. This action also reconciles any
inconsistencies in the treatment of Liechtenstein in light of its
Treaty and export control arrangement with Switzerland and therefore is
consistent with the effort of the United States to streamline licensing
requirements where export controls prescribed by the multilateral
regimes are implemented. Failure to immediately implement this rule
would result in an unnecessary licensing burden on businesses,
especially small businesses. Thus, in light of the United States'
understanding of how export controls are administered in Liechtenstein,
the United States seeks to assist businesses and prevent confusion by
immediately removing licensing requirements that are unnecessary in
light of the fact the international regime requirements are otherwise
being met. No other law requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking
and an opportunity for public comment be given for this rule. Because a
notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are
not required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or by any other
law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq., are not applicable. Therefore, this regulation is
issued in final form. In addition, the Department finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness for
the reasons provided above. Accordingly, this regulation is made
effective immediately upon publication.

List of Subjects

15 CFR Part 738

    Exports.

15 CFR Part 740

    Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

15 CFR Part 748

    Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Accordingly, parts 738, 740 and 748 of the Export Administration
Regulations (15 CFR parts 730 through 774) are amended as follows:

PART 738--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 738 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C. 7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u); 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42
U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C. 1354; 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 50 U.S.C. app. 5; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR,
1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p.
783; Notice of August 12, 2011, 76 FR 50661 (August 16, 2011).

0
2. Amend Sec.  738.3 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:

Sec.  738.3  Commerce Country Chart structure.

* * * * *
    (b) Countries. The first column of the Country Chart lists
countries in alphabetical order. There are a number of destinations
that are not listed in the Country Chart contained in Supplement No. 1
to part 738. If your destination is not listed on the Country Chart and
such destination is a territory, possession, dependency or department
of a country included on the Country Chart, the EAR accords your
destination the same licensing treatment as the country of which it is
a territory, possession, dependency or department. For example, if your
destination is the Cayman Islands, a dependent territory of the United
Kingdom, refer to the United Kingdom on the Country Chart for licensing
requirements. In addition, if your destination is Liechtenstein, which
serves as one territory with Switzerland for purposes of the EAR, refer
to Switzerland on the Country Chart for licensing requirements.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Supplement No. 1 to part 738 by
0
a. Revising the entry for ``Liechtenstein'' to read as set forth below;
and
0
c. Adding footnote 5 to read as set forth below.

                                                                      Supplement No. 1 to Part 738--Commerce Country Chart
                                                                                [Reason for control]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Chemical & biological           Nuclear        National security   Missile  Regional stability    Firearms            Crime control           Anti-terrorism
                                         weapons             nonproliferation  --------------------   tech                         convention  -------------------------------------------------
          Countries          --------------------------------------------------                    --------------------------------------------
                                CB  1     CB  2     CB  3     NP  1     NP  2     NS  1     NS  2     MT  1     RS  1     RS  2       EC  1       CC  1     CC  2     CC  3     AT  1     AT  2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liechtenstein \5\...........        X   ........  ........  ........  ........        X   ........        X         X   ........  ............        X   ........        X   ........  ........

                                                                                * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Refer to Switzerland for licensing requirements for Liechtenstein under the EAR.

PART 740--[AMENDED]

0
4. The authority citation for Part 740 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp.,
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice
of August 12, 2011, 76 FR 50661 (August 16, 2011).

Sec.  740.7  [Amended]

0
5. Amend Sec.  740.7 by removing ``Liechtenstein,'' from the group of
countries in paragraph (c)(1).

Sec.  740.16  [Amended]

0
6. Amend Sec.  740.16 by removing and reserving paragraph (g).

Supplement No. 1 to Part 740  [Amended]

0
7. Amend Country Group B of Supplement No. 1 to Part 740 by removing
``Liechtenstein''.

PART 748--[AMENDED]

0
8. The authority citation for Part 748 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66
FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 12, 2011, 76
FR 50661 (August 16, 2011).

Sec.  748.9  [Amended]

0
9. Amend Sec.  748.9 by removing ``Liechtenstein'' from the group of
countries listed in alphabetical order in paragraph (b)(2).

Supplement No. 4 to Part 748  [Amended]

0
10. Amend Supplement No. 4 to Part 748 by removing the entire entry for
``Liechtenstein''.

    Dated: November 7, 2011.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-29357 Filed 11-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 68 (Thursday, April 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19079-19080]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08177]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL 9925-91-OGC]

Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Consent Decree; Request for Public Comment

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended (``CAA'' or the ``Act''), notice is hereby given of a proposed
consent decree to address a lawsuit filed by Bill Green
(``Plaintiff''): Bill Green v. McCarthy, No. 4:14-cv-05093-TOR (E.D.
WA). On September 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed this complaint alleging
that Gina McCarthy, in her official capacity as Administrator of the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'' or ``the
Agency''), failed to perform a non-discretionary duty to grant or deny
within 60 days two petitions submitted by Plaintiff. In his petitions,
Plaintiff requested that EPA object to a CAA title V permit issued by
the Washington State Department of Ecology to the United States
Department of Energy, for purposes of operating the Hanford Site in
Benton County, Washington. The proposed consent decree would establish
a deadline for EPA to respond to these petitions.

DATES: Written comments on the proposed consent decree must be received
by May 11, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OGC-2015-0253, online at www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred method);
by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>by mail to EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; or by hand delivery or courier to
EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday,

excluding legal holidays. Comments on a disk or CD-ROM should be
formatted in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use of special characters
and any form of encryption, and may be mailed to the mailing address
above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Skinner-Thompson, Air and
Radiation Law Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Additional Information About the Proposed Consent Decree

    This proposed consent decree would resolve a lawsuit filed by
Plaintiff seeking to compel the Administrator to take actions under CAA
section 505(b)(2). Under the terms of the proposed consent decree, EPA
would agree to sign a response to the petitions by May 29, 2015. The
proposed consent decree also provides for the possibility that
circumstances beyond EPA's reasonable control could delay compliance
with the May 29, 2015 deadline, and provides a framework for extending
that deadline. In addition, the proposed consent decree also enumerates
Plaintiff's right to seek costs of litigation, including reasonable
attorneys' fees, and provides that payment of those costs will
constitute a full and complete settlement of all of Plaintiff's costs
in connection with this litigation.
    For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will accept written comments relating to the
proposed consent decree from persons who are not named as parties or
intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the Department of
Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed consent decree
if the comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate that
such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent
with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the Department of
Justice determines that consent to this consent decree should be
withdrawn, the terms of the consent decree will be affirmed.

II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree

A. How can I get a copy of the proposed consent decree?

    The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2015-0253) contains a copy of the proposed consent
decree. The official public docket is available for public viewing at
the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the OEI Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    An electronic version of the public docket is available through
www.regulations.gov. You may use the www.regulations.gov to submit or
view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the
official public docket, and access those documents in the public docket
that are available electronically. Once in the system, key in the
appropriate docket identification number then select ``search.''
    It is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available
for public viewing online at www.regulations.gov without change, unless
the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information claimed as CBI
and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute is not
included in the official public docket or in the electronic public
docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material, including
copyrighted material contained in a public comment, will not be placed
in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all
docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access
any of the publicly available docket materials through the EPA Docket
Center.

B. How and to whom do I submit comments?

    You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.
    If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD
ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
    Use of the www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. The
electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, email address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's electronic mail
(email) system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an
email comment directly to the Docket without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email address is automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.

    Dated: April 1, 2015.
Lorie J. Schmidt,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-08177 Filed 4-8-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34765-34767]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12182]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2022 / Rules
and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0285; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-01448-A;
Amendment 39-22066; AD 2022-11-16]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace (Operations) Limited
and British Aerospace Regional Aircraft Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
British Aerospace (Operations) Limited Model Jetstream Model 3101
airplanes and British Aerospace Regional Aircraft Model Jetstream Model
3201 airplanes. This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI identifies the unsafe condition as stress
corrosion cracking of the primary flight control cable terminals. This
AD requires repetitively inspecting the turnbuckle type control cable
terminals in the rudder and elevator primary flight control circuits
for corrosion, pitting, and cracking and, depending on the inspection
results, replacing an affected cable assembly. The FAA is issuing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective July 13, 2022.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of July 13,
2022.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd., Customer Information Department,
Prestwick International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United
Kingdom; phone: +44 3300 488727; fax: +44 1292 675704; email:
[email protected]; website: https://www.baesystems.com/businesses/regionalaircraft/. You may view this service information at
the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 901
Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2022-0285.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0285; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, the
MCAI, any comments received, and other information. The address for
Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aviation Safety
Engineer, General Aviation & Rotorcraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO 64106;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all British Aerospace
(Operations) Limited Model Jetstream Model 3101 and British Aerospace
Regional Aircraft Model Jetstream Model 3201 airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on March 22, 2022 (87 FR 16118). The
NPRM was prompted by MCAI originated by the Civil Aviation Authority
(CAA), which is the aviation authority for the United Kingdom. CAA has
issued AD G-2021-0017, dated December 21, 2021 (referred to after this
as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition on all BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Model Jetstream Series 3100 and Series 3200
airplanes. The MCAI states:

    There were reports of cable terminal failures on a variety of
civil aircraft types (which did not include the Jetstream 3100 &
3200 series aircraft). These reports were initially made in the USA,
Australia & New Zealand. Subsequent investigations identified that
the failed terminals were made from the same material specification;
MS21260, which calls up materials SAE303Se or SAE304 stainless
steel. It is understood that these corrosion resistant steels are
susceptible to Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) in service when
subject to contamination.
    BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd recognises that SAE 303Se and 304
stainless steels are used in the primary flight control cable
terminal of the Jetstream 3100 & 3200 series aircraft.
    The Jetstream 3100 & 3200 series aircraft feature a single path
for the elevator and rudder primary control cable circuits. For the
elevator circuit, a potential unsafe condition exists if an elevator
cable terminal fails at any point in the primary elevator system aft
of the dual flight controls in the cockpit, because this would
result in a loss of primary elevator control. This is only
considered unsafe during take-off after V1, where sufficient runway
may not be available to brake the aircraft, or during an approach
where there is insufficient altitude to recover control of the
aircraft using the aircraft's elevator trim controls.
    For the rudder circuit, a potential unsafe condition exists if a
rudder cable terminal fails at any point in the primary rudder
system aft of the dual flight controls in the cockpit, because this
would result in a loss of primary rudder control. This is only
considered unsafe when landing in strong crosswinds or after an
engine failure during take-off and initial climb, where vertical
axis (yaw) control cannot be maintained using rudder trim or
asymmetrical power.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-
0285.
    In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require repetitively inspecting
the turnbuckle type control cable terminals in the rudder and elevator
primary flight control circuits for corrosion, pitting, and cracking
and, depending on the inspection results, replacing an affected cable
assembly. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the costs.

Conclusion

    These products have been approved by the aviation authority of
another country and are approved for operation in the United States.
Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design
Authority, it has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in
the MCAI referenced above. The FAA reviewed the relevant data and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD as proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products. This AD is adopted as proposed
in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200
Service Bulletin 27-JA181040, Original Issue, dated January 17, 2019.
This service information specifies procedures for repetitively
inspecting all threaded turnbuckle type control cable end terminals on
certain part-numbered rudder and elevator primary flight control
circuits for signs of corrosion, pitting, and cracking on the terminal
fitting, and specifies replacing an affected cable assembly when the
inspection results require it. This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI

    The MCAI and service information apply to Model Jetstream Series
3100 and Jetstream Series 3200 airplanes, which are identified on the
FAA type certificates as Jetstream Model 3101 airplanes and Jetstream
Model 3201 airplanes, respectively.
    Although the service information specifies reporting inspection
results to the manufacturer, this AD does not require that action.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 18 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
         Action                Labor cost             Parts cost          Cost per airplane        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection..............  4 work-hours x $85   Not applicable..........  $340 per inspection  $6,120 per
                           per hour = $340.                               cycle.               inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to replace a cable assembly
based on the results of the inspection. The FAA has no way of
determining the number of airplanes that might need this action:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                 Labor cost               Parts cost       airplane
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement of cable assembly.................  10 work-hours x $85 per hour =            $5,000          $5,850
                                                 $850.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2022-11-16 British Aerospace (Operations) Limited and British
Aerospace Regional Aircraft: Amendment 39-22066; Docket No. FAA-
2022-0285; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-01448-A.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective July 13, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to British Aerospace (Operations) Limited Model
Jetstream Model 3101 airplanes and British Aerospace Regional
Aircraft Model Jetstream Model 3201 airplanes, all serial numbers,
certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 2720, Rudder Control
System; and 2730, Elevator Control System.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI identifies the unsafe condition as stress
corrosion cracking of the primary flight control cable terminal. The
FAA is issuing this AD to detect and correct corrosion, pitting, or
cracking in the primary flight control cable terminals. The unsafe
condition, if not addressed, could result in failure of the primary
flight control cable terminal and loss of airplane control.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    (1) Before any primary rudder or primary elevator flight control
circuit cable accumulates 16 years since first installation on an
airplane or within 12 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 24
months, inspect all threaded turnbuckle type control cable terminals
for signs of corrosion, pitting, and cracking by following paragraph
(2) in Section 2.B. Part 1 and Section 2.B. Part 2 of the
Accomplishment Instructions in British Aerospace Jetstream Series
3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin 27-JA181040, Original Issue, dated
January 17, 2019 (SB 27-JA181040). If the age of any primary rudder
or primary elevator flight control circuit cable is unknown, do the
inspection within 12 months after the effective date of this AD and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 24 months.
    (2) If, during any inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of
this AD, there is pitting or cracking or corrosion that exceeds
minimum damage limits, before further flight, replace the affected
cable assembly with a new (zero hours time-in-service) cable
assembly.
    (3) Replacing a cable assembly does not terminate the
inspections required by this AD. After replacing a cable assembly,
do the inspection in paragraph (g)(1) of this AD before the cable
assembly accumulates 15 years since first installation on an
airplane and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 24 months.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the certification office, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD
and email to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(i) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Doug Rudolph,
Aviation Safety Engineer, General Aviation & Rotorcraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas
City, MO 64106; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].
    (2) Refer to Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) AD G-2021-0017,
dated December 21, 2021, for related information. You may examine
the CAA AD in the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0285.

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service
Bulletin 27-JA181040, Original Issue, dated January 17, 2019.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact BAE
Systems (Operations) Ltd., Customer Information Department,
Prestwick International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United
Kingdom; phone: +44 3300 488727; fax: +44 1292 675704; email:
[email protected]; website: https://www.baesystems.com/businesses/regionalaircraft/.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 901
Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email: [email protected], or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on May 24, 2022.
Ross Landes,
Deputy Director for Regulatory Operations, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-12182 Filed 6-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P