[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6722-6724]
[FR Doc No: 2023-02078]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0750; FRL-10527-01-OCSPP]

Pesticide Registration Review; Proposed Decisions for Several
Pesticides; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's proposed
interim and final registration review decisions and opens a 60-day
public comment period on the proposed decisions for the following
pesticides: coat protein gene of plum pox virus, dioctyl sodium
sulfosuccinate, isopropyl myristate, polymeric betaine, undecylenic
acid.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 3, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0750, through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional
instructions on commenting and visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For pesticide specific information, contact: The Chemical Review
Manager for the pesticide of interest identified in Table 1 in Unit IV.
    For general information on the registration review program,
contact: Melanie Biscoe, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P),
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 566-0701; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest
identified in Table 1 in Unit IV.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at: https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low-income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.

II. Background

    Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide
registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform
its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment. As part of the registration review process,
the Agency has completed proposed interim or final decisions for all
pesticides listed in Table 1 in Unit IV. Through this program, EPA is
ensuring that each pesticide's registration is based on current
scientific and other knowledge, including its effects on human health
and the environment.

III. Authority

    EPA is conducting its registration review of the chemicals listed
in the Table 1 in Unit IV pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural
Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C.
Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the
registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under
FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only
if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA
section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance with
widespread and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must
perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on
the environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the
environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the
use of a pesticide in or on food.

IV. What action is the Agency taking?

    Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice announces the availability
of EPA's proposed interim or final registration review decisions for
the pesticides shown in Table 1 and opens a 60-day public comment
period on the proposed interim and proposed final registration review
decisions.

         Table 1--Proposed Interim and Proposed Final Decisions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Chemical review
 Registration review case name    Docket ID No.     manager and contact
            and No.                                     information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coat Protein Gene of Plum Pox   EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0  Michael Glikes,
 Virus, Case Number 6601.        410.               [email protected],<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate,  EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0  Robert Little,
 Case 4095.                      550.               [email protected],<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Isopropyl Myristate, Case       EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0  Hannah Dean,
 Number 6315.                    842.               [email protected],
<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Polymeric betaine, Case Number  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0  Erin Dandridge,
 5116.                           374.               [email protected],<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Undecylenic acid, Case 4095...  EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0  Robert Little,
                                 549.               [email protected],<PHONE_NUMBER>.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The registration review docket for a pesticide includes earlier
documents related to the registration review case. For example, the
review opened with a Preliminary Work Plan, for public comment. A Final
Work Plan was placed in the docket following public comment on the
Preliminary Work Plan.
    The documents in the dockets describe EPA's rationales for
conducting additional risk assessments for the registration review of
the pesticides included in Table 1 in Unit IV, as well as the Agency's
subsequent risk findings and consideration of possible risk mitigation
measures. These proposed interim and proposed final registration review
decisions are supported by the rationales included in those documents.
Following public comment, the Agency will issue interim or final
registration review decisions for the pesticides listed in Table 1 in
Unit IV.
    The registration review final rule at 40 CFR 155.58(a) provides for
a minimum 60-day public comment period on all proposed registration
review decisions. This comment period is intended to provide an
opportunity for public input and a mechanism for initiating any
necessary amendments to the proposed decision. All comments should be

submitted using the methods in ADDRESSES and must be received by EPA on
or before the closing date. These comments will become part of the
docket for the pesticides included in the Tables in Unit IV. Comments
received after the close of the comment period will be marked ``late.''
EPA is not required to consider these late comments.
    The Agency will carefully consider all comments received by the
closing date and may provide a ``Response to Comments Memorandum'' in
the docket. The interim or final registration review decision will
explain the effect that any comments had on the decision and provide
the Agency's response to significant comments.
    Background on the registration review program is provided at:
https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.
    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: January 23, 2023.
Mary Elissa Reaves,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2023-02078 Filed 1-31-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 997-998]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00064]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 34460]

Notice of Applications for Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940

January 3, 2022.
    The following is a notice of applications for deregistration under
section 8(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for the month of
December 2021. A copy of each application may be obtained via the
Commission's website by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. An order granting each
application will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing on any application by emailing the SEC's
Secretary at [email protected] and serving the relevant
applicant with a copy of the request by email, if an email address is
listed for the relevant applicant below, or personally or by mail, if a
physical address is listed for the relevant applicant below. Hearing
requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on January 25,
2022, and should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in
the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Pursuant to Rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the
desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason for the request,
and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing
may request notification by writing to the Commission's Secretary at
[email protected].

ADDRESSES: The Commission: [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shawn Davis, Assistant Director, at
(202) 551-6413 or Chief Counsel's Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>; SEC,
Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office, 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549-8010.

American Beacon Apollo Total Return Fund [File No. 811-23351]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On June 28,
2021, applicant made liquidating distributions to its shareholders
based on net asset value. Expenses of $2,397 incurred in connection
with the liquidation were paid by the applicant.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on November 24, 2021, and
amended on December 17, 2021.
    Applicant's Address: [email protected].

American Beacon Sound Point Enhanced Income Fund [File No. 811-23326]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On July 6,
2021, applicant made liquidating distributions to its shareholders
based on net asset value. Expenses of $2,397 incurred in connection
with the liquidation were paid by the applicant.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on November 24, 2021, and
amended on December 17, 2021.
    Applicant's Address: [email protected].

Gadsden ETF Trust [File No. 811-23329]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. Applicant has never made a public offering of
its securities and does not propose to make a public offering or engage
in business of any kind.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on September 20, 2021, and
amended on December 6, 2021.
    Applicant's Address: [email protected].

General New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund, Inc. [File No. 811-
05527]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On September 11, 2020, applicant made a
liquidating distribution to its shareholders based on net asset value.
Expenses of $3,324 incurred in connection with the liquidation were
paid by the applicant's investment advisor.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on October 12, 2021, and
amended on December 14, 2021.
    Applicant's Address: [email protected].

SPT Funds Investment Trust [File No. 811-22159]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. Applicant has never made a public offering of
its securities and does not propose to make a public offering or engage
in business of any kind.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on November 9, 2021.
    Applicant's Address: ca.com">[email protected]ca.com.

Stone Ridge Trust VI [File No. 811-23478]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On June 21,
2021, applicant made liquidating distributions to its shareholders
based on net asset value. Expenses of $36,029 incurred in connection
with the reorganization were paid by the applicant's investment
adviser.

    Filing Dates: The application was filed on September 13, 2021, and
amended on December 3, 2021.
    Applicant's Address: [email protected].

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-00064 Filed 1-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: July 30, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 145)]
[Notices]
[Page 38015-38016]
[DOCID:fr30jy09-61]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8937-3]

Proposed Consent Decree and Proposed Settlement Agreement, Clean
Air Act Citizen Suit

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed consent decree and proposed settlement
agreement; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended (``CAA'' or ``Act''), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given
of a proposed consent degree and proposed settlement agreement to
address a lawsuit filed by the Business Coalition for Clean Air (BCCA)
Appeal Group, Texas Association of Business, and Texas Oil and Gas
Association in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Texas, Dallas Division in BCCA Appeal Group, et al. v. EPA,
No. 3-08CV1491-G (N.D. Tex.). Plaintiffs filed a complaint in this
action on August 25, 2008, which alleges that EPA has failed to perform
nondiscretionary duties pursuant to section 110(k)(1)(B) and (k)(2) of
the Federal CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(k)(1)(B) and (k)(2), to take final
action on numerous Texas State Implementation Plan (``SIP'') air
quality revisions by the statutory deadline. The SIP revisions are
related to Texas New Source Review (NSR) air permitting and banking and
trading rules. The proposed consent decree and proposed settlement
agreement, if finalized, will collectively resolve plaintiffs' claims
in this matter. A schedule for acting on the SIP revisions is attached
to the proposed consent decree and proposed settlement agreement.

DATES: Written comments on the proposed consent decree and proposed
settlement agreement must be received by August 31, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OGC-2009-0560, online at http://www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred
method); by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>by mail to EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; or by hand delivery or courier to
EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. Comments on a disk or CD-ROM should be
formatted in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use of special characters
and any form of encryption, and may be mailed to the mailing address
above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria L. Johnson, Office of
Regional Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 (6RC-
M), 1445 Ross Ave., Dallas, TX 75202-2733; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Additional Information About the Proposed Consent Decree and
Proposed Settlement Agreement

    The proposed consent decree and proposed settlement agreement
resolve a lawsuit filed by BCCA seeking to compel action by the EPA
under section 110(k) of the CAA on identified SIP revisions submitted
by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). The SIP
revisions involve Texas NSR air permitting and banking and trading
rules. The proposed consent decree and proposed settlement agreement
provide that EPA shall sign for publication in the Federal Register a
notice of final rulemaking to approve or disapprove, in whole or in
part, the SIP revisions identified by the deadline specified in the
Exhibit attached to each document and to deliver the notice promptly to
the Office of the Federal Register. If EPA has discharged its
obligations under the consent decree, the case will be dismissed with
prejudice. Plaintiffs have agreed to stay this case in its entirety
pending completion of, and subject to the terms of, the consent decree
and settlement agreement.
    For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to
the proposed consent decree and proposed settlement agreement from
persons who were not named as parties or intervenors to the litigation
in question. EPA or the Department of Justice may withdraw or withhold
consent to the proposed consent decree and proposed settlement
agreement if comments disclose facts or circumstances indicating that
such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent
with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the Department of
Justice determines, based on any comment which may be submitted, that
consent to the consent decree and settlement agreement should be
withdrawn, the terms of the decree and agreement will be affirmed.

II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree and Proposed Settlement Agreement

A. How Can I Get A Copy of the Proposed Consent Decree and Proposed
Settlement Agreement?

    The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2009-0560) contains a copy of the proposed consent
decree and proposed settlement agreement. The official public docket is
available for public viewing at the Office of Environmental Information
(OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OEI
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    An electronic version of the public docket is available through
http://www.regulations.gov. You may use http://www.regulations.gov to
submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the
contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents
in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``search,'' then key in the appropriate docket
identification number.
    It is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available
for public viewing online at http://www.regulations.gov without change,
unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information
claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute is not included in the official public docket or in the
electronic public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material,
including copyrighted material contained in a public comment, will not
be placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only
in printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all
docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access
any

of the publicly available docket materials through the EPA Docket
Center.

B. How and To Whom Do I Submit Comments?

    You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.
    If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an e-mail address or other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or
CD-ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
    Use of the http://www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments
to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments.
The electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's electronic mail
(e-mail) system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an
e-mail comment directly to the Docket without going through http://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address is automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.

    Dated: July 23, 2009.
Richard B. Ossias,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-18197 Filed 7-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<META name="generator" content="PDFCreactiveX HTML Export">
<META name="creation-date" content="24/05/2008 06:32:08 ">
<TITLE></TITLE>


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 15, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 81167-81168]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27477]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2020-1072; Airspace Docket No. 20-ACE-23]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Leoti, KS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at Mark Hoard Memorial Airport,
Leoti, KS. The establishment of Class E airspace facilitates the
airport's transition from visual flight rules (VFR) to instrument
flight rules (IFR) operations. This action would ensure the safety and
management of IFR operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 29, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
telephone: 1(800) 647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA
Docket No. FAA-2020-1072; Airspace Docket No. 20-ACE-23, at the
beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11E at NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr_locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Van Der Wal, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western Service Center, Operations Support Group, 2200
S 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would establish Class E airspace to support the airport's
transition from VFR to IFR operations at Mark Hoard Memorial Airport,
Leoti, KS.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Persons wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2020-1072;
Airspace Docket No. 20-ACE-23''. The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov//air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours, except federal holidays, at the Northwest Mountain
Regional Office of the Federal Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Western Service Center, Operations Support Group, 2200 S
216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and effective
September 15, 2020. FAA Order 7400.11E is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by establishing Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at the Mark Hoard Memorial
Airport, Leoti, KS. The establishment of Class E airspace facilitates
the airport's transition from VFR to IFR operations. The airspace is
designed to contain IFR departures to 1,200 feet above the surface and
IFR arrivals descending below 1,500 feet above the surface. The area
would be described as follows: That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile radius of Mark Hoard Memorial
Airport.

    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.11E, dated July 21, 2020, and effective September 15,
2020, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial, and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11E,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and
effective September 15, 2020, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005. Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ACE KS E5 Leoti, KS [New]

Mark Hoard Memorial Airport, KS
    (Lat. 38[deg]27'27'' N, long. 101[deg]21'03'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of Mark Hoard Memorial Airport.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on December 7, 2020.
B.G. Chew,
Acting Group Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2020-27477 Filed 12-14-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR PART 52 [ R06 OAR 2005 TX 0030; FRL_______________]

Approval And Promulgation of Implementation Plans;

Texas; Revisions to Regulations for Control of Air Pollution by Permits for New Construction or Modification AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan ( SIP) which the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality ( TCEQ)

submitted to EPA on February 5, 2004. The adopted amendments revise minimum distance limitation permit requirements for operation of new and modified sources to allow storage of an inoperative concrete crusher within 440 yards of a residence, school, or place of worship; define how distance measurements should be taken and when they would be applicable to concrete crushers and other facilities; and allow concrete crushers to recycle broken concrete at temporary demolition sites within 440 yards of nearby buildings, unless the facility is located in a county with a population of 2.4 million or more, or in a county adjacent to such a county. The TCEQ also revised the existing distance limitation for hazardous waste management facilities to crossreference duplicative language elsewhere in its regulations. This action is being taken under 2 section 110 of the Federal Clean Air Act ( the Act, or CAA).

DATES: This rule is effective on [ Insert date 60 days from date of publication in the Federal Register] without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by [ Insert date 30 days from date of publication in the Federal Register]. If EPA receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Regional Material in EDocket ( RME) ID No. R06 OAR 2005 TX 0030, by one of the following methods:

° Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www. regulations. gov. Follow the on line instructions for submitting comments.

° Agency Website: http:// docket. epa. gov/ rmepub/ Regional Material in EDocket ( RME),

EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. Once in the system, select " quick search," then key in the appropriate RME Docket identification number. Follow the on line instructions for submitting comments.

° EPA Region 6 " Contact Us" web site: http:// epa. gov/ region6/ r6coment. htm Please click on " 6PD" ( Multimedia) and select " Air" before submitting comments.

° E mail: Mr. David Neleigh at neleigh. david@ epa. gov. Please also forward a copy to the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section below.

° Fax: Mr. David Neleigh, Chief, Air Permits Section ( 6PD R), at fax number 214 665

7263. 3 ° Mail: Mr. David Neleigh, Chief, Air Permits Section ( 6PD R), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202 2733.

° Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr. David Neleigh, Chief, Air Permits Section ( 6PD R),

Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202 2733.

Such deliveries are accepted only between the hours of 8: 00 am and 4: 00 pm weekdays except for legal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.

Instructions: Direct your comments to Regional Material in RME ID No. R06 OAR 2005 TX

0030. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public file without change, and may be made available online at http:// docket. epa. gov/ rmepub/, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information ( CBI) or other information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Do not submit information through Regional Material in EDocket ( RME),

Regulations. gov, or e mail if you believe that it is CBI or otherwise protected from disclosure.

The EPA RME website and the federal regulations. gov are " anonymous access" systems, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e mail comment directly to EPA without going through RME or regulations. gov, your e mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public file and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any 4 form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.

Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the Regional Material in EDocket ( RME) index at http:// docket. epa. gov/ rmepub/. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i. e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in RME or in the official file which is available at the Air Permits Section ( 6PD R),

Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202 2733. The file will be made available by appointment for public inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review Room between the hours of 8: 30 am and 4: 30 pm weekdays except for legal holidays. Contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at ( 214) 665 7523 to make an appointment. If possible, please make the appointment at least two working days in advance of your visit. There will be a 15 cent per page fee for making photocopies of documents. On the day of the visit, please check in at the EPA Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.

The state submittal is also available for public inspection at the state Air Agency listed below during official business hours by appointment:

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Office of Air Quality, 12124 Park 35 Circle,

Austin, Texas 78753.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley M. Spruiell, Air Permits Section ( 6PD R), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, 5 Dallas, Texas 75202 2733, telephone ( 214) 665 7212; fax number 214 665 7263; e mail address spruiell. stanley@ epa. gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Throughout this document wherever " we," " us," or " our" is used, we mean the EPA.

Table of Contents I. What Is Being Addressed in this Document?

II. Have the Requirements for Approval of a SIP Revision Been Met?

III. What Final Action is EPA Taking?

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Review I. What Is Being Addressed in this Document?

We are taking direct final action to approve revisions to Title 30 of the Texas Administrative Code ( 30 TAC) Section 116.112  Distance Limitations into the Texas SIP. The TCEQ adopted these revisions on January 14, 2004, and submitted the revisions to us for approval as a revision to the SIP on February 5, 2004. The rulemaking implements Texas House Bills 555 and 1287, section 5.07, 78th Legislature, 2003.

Section 116.112 currently establishes distance limitations for lead smelters, hazardous waste facilities, and concrete crushing facilities. These distance limitations apply to new and modified facilities in these source categories as conditions of their new source review authorizations. The existing distance limitations were approved September 30, 2003 ( 68 FR 6 56176).

The revisions to section 116.112 which TCEQ submitted to EPA on February 5, 2004,

revised the section 116.112 as follows:

< The revised rule allows for storage of an inoperative concrete crusher within 440 yards of a residence, school, or place or worship if the residence, school, or place or worship was in use at the time the owner or operator filed an application for the initial authorization to operate that facility at that location with the TCEQ.

< The revised rule defines how distance measurements should be taken and when they would be applicable to distances between concrete crushers and other facilities.

< The revised rule provides an exemption from minimum distance limitations for concrete crushing which results from on site demolition for use primarily at that site. The exemption is limited to one period of no more than 180 days and is applicable if the facility is not located in a county with a population of 2.4 million or more, or in a county adjacent to such county.

< The citation of the distance limitations for hazardous waste management facilities was redesignated from section 116.112( 2) to section 116.112( c) and revised to refer to the duplicative distance limitations for such facilities in 30 TAC section 335.204 ( relating to Unsuitable Characteristics) and section 335.205 ( relating to Prohibition of Permit Issuance). These cross referenced sections are equivalent to the former provisions of section 116.112( 2). The TCEQ limited applicability of the cross referenced provisions to section 335.204, as amended and adopted in the August 22, 2003 issue of the Texas Register ( 28 TexReg 6915), and section 335.205, as amended and adopted in the 7 November 9, 2001 issue of the Texas Register ( 26 TexReg 9135). Thus hazardous waste management facilities must comply with the distance limitations in the specific versions of sections 335.204 and 335.205 identified in section 116.112( c). If TCEQ later revises section 335.204 or section 335.205, it must submit an appropriate SIP revision to EPA to incorporate the revised version of section 335.204 or section 335.205 into section 116.112 and receive EPA approval in order for EPA to recognize the revised versions of these sections.

The Technical Support Document, which is part of the record for this action, contains more detailed information on how the revision meets the requirements of the Act, including Section 110 and implementing regulations.

II. Have the Requirements for Approval of a SIP Revision Been Met?

The distance limitations in section 116.112 are a discretionary measure not mandated by the CAA. The revision strengthens the SIP by providing protection for persons located near a lead smelter, concrete crushing facility, or hazardous waste management facility. By restricting the location of these types of facilities, the SIP provides additional assurance that persons located near these types of facilities will not be adversely affected by exposure to the air contaminants emitted from these facilities. House Bill 1287 restricts Texas' authority to provide an exemption from the distance limitation and measurement requirements to facilities for which the Commission determines that operation at the location will cause no adverse environmental or health effects.

Texas has stated that compliance with this condition will be determined during protectiveness review as part of permit development. The permit review will determine compliance with section 8 116.111( 2)( A)( i) of the existing SIP, which provides that the emissions from a new or modified facility will comply with all rules and regulations of the Commission and with the intent of the Texas Clean Air Act, including the protection of the health and physical property of the people.

Texas noted that sources must also comply with the nuisance provisions of section 101.4 of the SIP. We have determined that the revision meets the requirements of 40 CFR 51.160( a) and section 110( l) of the CAA because it sets forth legally enforceable procedures that require the TCEQ to determine whether the construction or modification will result in a violation of applicable portions of the control strategy or will interfere with attainment or maintenance of a national standard. The revision also meets the requirement of 40 CFR 51.160( e) to identify types of facilities that will be subject to review.

III. What Final Action is EPA Taking?

We are approving as a revision to the Texas SIP revisions of 30 TAC section 116.112

Distance Limitations, which Texas submitted on February 5, 2004. We are publishing this rule without prior proposal because we view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication,

we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are received. This rule will be effective on [ FEDERAL REGISTER OFFICE: insert date 60 days from date of publication in the Federal Register] without further notice unless we receive adverse comment by [ FEDERAL REGISTER OFFICE: insert date 30 days from date of publication in the Federal Register]. If we receive adverse comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that 9 the rule will not take effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under Executive Order 12866 ( 58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a " significant regulatory action" and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, " Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use" ( 66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act ( 5 U. S. C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule approves pre existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 ( Public Law 104 4).

This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 10 Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 ( 65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 ( 64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 " Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks" ( 62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the state to use voluntary consensus standards ( VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12( d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 ( 15 U. S. C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 ( 44 U. S. C. 3501 et seq.).

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U. S. C. section 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of 11 the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States.

EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U. S. Senate,

the U. S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a " major rule" as defined by 5 U. S. C.

section 804( 2).

Under section 307( b)( 1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by [ FEDERAL REGISTER OFFICE: insert date 60 days from date of publication of this document in the Federal Register]. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. ( See section 307( b)( 2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon Monoxide, Hydrocarbons,

Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone,

Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds 11/ 30/ 05 Dated: / s/ Carl E. Edlund 12 Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6. 13 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52  [ AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U. S. C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart SS  Texas 2. The table in § 52.2270( c) entitled " EPA Approved Regulations in the Texas SIP" is amended by revising the entry for Section 116.112 to read as follows:

§ 52.2270 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

( c) * * *

EPA Approved Regulations in the Texas SIP State citation Title/ Subject State approval / Submittal date EPA approval date Explanatio n * * * * * * *

Chapter 116 ( Reg 6)  Control of Air Pollution by Permits for New Construction or Modification * * * * * * *

Subchapter B  New Source Review Permits Division 1  Permit Application * * * * * * *

Section 116.112 Distance Limitations 01/ 14/ 04 [ Insert date of FR publication] [ Insert FR page number where document begins]

* * * * * * *


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 109 (Thursday, June 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34089-34090]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13398]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP13-483-000; PF12-7-000]

Jordan Cove Energy Project, L.P.; Notice of Application

    Take notice that on May 21, 2013, Jordan Cove Energy Project, L.P.
(Jordan Cove), 125 Central Avenue, Suite 380, Coos Bay, Oregon 97420,
filed in Docket No. CP13-483-000 an application under section 3 of the
Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Parts 153 and 380 of the Commission's
regulations, seeking authorization to site, construct and operate a
natural gas liquefaction and liquefied natural gas (LNG) export
facility (Liquefaction Project) on the bay side of the North Spit of
Coos Bay in unincorporated Coos County, Oregon, to the north of the
Cities of North Bend and Coos Bay. The LNG Terminal will be capable of
receiving natural gas via the Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline (Pacific
Connector, applying separately for authorization under NGA section 7),
liquefying it, storing it in its liquefied state in two cryogenic
storage tanks, and loading the LNG onto ocean going vessels, all as
more fully set forth in the application which is on file with the
Commission and open to public inspection. Copies of this filing are
available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room, or
may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-
free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Questions regarding this application should be directed to Beth L.
Webb, Dickstein Shapiro LLP, 1825 Eye Street NW., Washington, DC 20006,
or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

    On March 6, 2012, the Commission staff granted Jordan Cove's
request to utilize the Pre-Filing Process and assigned Docket No. PF12-
7 to staff activities involved with Jordan Cove's Liquefaction Project.
Now, as of the filing of the application on May 21, 2013, the Pre-
Filing Process for this project has ended. From this time forward, this
proceeding will be conducted in Docket No. CP13-483-000, as noted in
the caption of this Notice.
    Because the environmental review of the Jordan Cove Energy Project
must also include the Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline LP (Pacific
Connector), as the connecting supply pipeline to the LNG terminal, the
Commission cannot begin preparation of the Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, until Pacific Connector's application is filed. Within 90 days
after the Commission issues a Notice of Application for the Pacific
Connector application, the Commission staff will issue a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review that will indicate the anticipated
date for the Commission's staff issuance of the final EIS analyzing
both proposals. The issuance of a Notice of Schedule for Environmental
Review will also serve to notify federal and state agencies of the
timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the subsequent
need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days of the date
of issuance of the Commission staff's final EIS.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, before the
comment date of this notice, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to
intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary
of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the
applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of
filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant
and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the
proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests, and interventions via the internet in lieu of paper. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site (www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link. Persons unable to file
electronically should submit an original and 5 copies of the protest or
intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on June 20, 2013.

    Dated: May 30, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-13398 Filed 6-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28121-28123]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11572]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Approvals and
Disapprovals

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Monthly Notice of PFC Approvals and Disapprovals. In April
2011, there were five applications approved. This notice also includes
information on one application, approved in March 2011, inadvertently
left off the March 2011 notice. Additionally, eight approved amendments
to previously approved applications are listed.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA publishes a monthly notice, as appropriate, of PFC
approvals and disapprovals under the provisions of the Aviation Safety
and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101-508) and Part 158 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 158). This notice is
published pursuant to paragraph d of Sec.  158.2 9.

PFC Applications Approved

    Public Agency: South Jersey Transportation Authority, Egg Harbor
Township, New Jersey.
    Application Number: 11-07-C-00-ACY.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $9,079,204.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: June 1, 2011.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: July 1, 2014.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFCs: Air taxi/
commercial operators--nonscheduled/on-demand air carriers filing FAA
Form 1800-31 and enplaning less than 500 passengers annually.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information submitted in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Atlantic City International Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:
    Terminal apron expansion, phase 1B.
    Environmental mitigation, phases V and VI.
    Expand terminal building, phase 1 design.
    Acquire equipment--rotating beacon tower replacement.
    Install perimeter fencing.
    Acquire radio equipment for emergency operations center.
    Interactive employee training system.
    Security cameras.
    Snow removal equipment.
    Update airport master plan study phases I and II.
    Obstruction survey and wildlife assessment.
    Decision Date: March 17, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori Ledebohm, Harrisburg Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: Lafayette Airport Commission, Lafayette, Louisiana.
    Application Number: 11-07-C-00-LFT.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $1,000,000.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: May 1, 2013.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: May 1, 2014.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFCs: Air taxi/
commercial operators filing FAA Form 1800-31.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information submitted in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Lafayette Regional Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:
    Procurement and installation of aircraft loading bridge.
    PFC development, implementation, and administration.
    Decision Date: April 6, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ilia Quinones, Louisiana/New Mexico
Airports Development Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: County of Buncomb and City of Asheville, Asheville,
North Carolina.
    Application Number: 11-05-C-00-AVL.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $6,098,948.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 1, 2011.

    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: February 1, 2018.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFCs: Air taxi/
commercial operators.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information submitted in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Asheville regional Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:
    Landside roadway access and parking.
    ``A'' gate terminal improvements.
    Terminal roof replacement.
    North general aviation area.
    Preconditioned air and fixed ground power.
    Airfield environmental assessment.
    Wright Brothers Way extension.
    Snow removal equipment.
    Master plan update.
    Airfield/roadway sweeper.
    PFC application development.
    PFC application administration.
    Brief Description of Project Approved for Collection:
    Runway 16/34 improvement program.
    Brief Description of Project Partially Approved for Collection and
Use:
    Aircraft rescue and firefighting facility.
    Determination: The approval of this project is limited to the
minimum size facility needed to meet Part 139 requirements.
    Brief Description of Disapproved Projects:
    Aircraft rescue and firefighting equipment.
    Determination: The proposed equipment was not required by Part 139
and, therefore, is not PFC eligible.
    Glycol recovery vehicle.
    Deicing vehicle.
    Determination: Neither vehicle is PFC eligible.
    Decision Date: April 21, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Marshall, Atlanta Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: City of Valdosta, Georgia.
    Application Number: 11-10-C-00-VLD.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $472,800.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: June 1, 2011.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: October 1, 2012.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFCs: Air taxi/
commercial operators.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information submitted in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Valdosta Regional Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:
    Airport master plan update.
    Terminal ramp (design).
    Rehabilitate taxiway A (design).
    Groove runway (design).
    Rehabilitate taxiway A.
    Grooving of 1,700 feet of runway 35 and associated work.
    Airfield drainage rehabilitation (design).
    Airfield drainage rehabilitation.
    Prepare PFC application.
    Programming, design, and construction of replacement aircraft
rescue and firefighting building, including sitework.
    Programming of new general aviation terminal sitework, entrance
road, and apron improvements.
    Acquire aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicle.
    Commercial terminal building improvements.
    Design and construction of new general aviation terminal sitework,
entrance road, and apron.
    Brief Description of Withdrawn Projects:
    Programming and design of obstruction clearing--phase 1 runway 17/
35.
    Programming of replacement air traffic control tower.
    Aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicle improvements.
    Design and installation of security access control systems--phase
1.
    Construction of obstruction clearing--phase 1 (runway 17/35).
    Design and construction of replacement air traffic control tower,
including sitework.
    Date of Withdrawal: April 19, 2011.
    Decision Date: April 25, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna Guss, Atlanta Airports District
Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: Massachusetts Port Authority, Boston, Massachusetts.
    Application Number: 10-06-C-00-BOS.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $392,093,000.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 1, 2016.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: December 1, 2023.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFCs: Nonscheduled/
on-demand air carriers.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information submitted in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Boston Logan International Airport.
    Brief Description of Project Approved for Collection at a $4.50 PFC
Level:
    Development of runway safety area for runway 33L.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use at a
$4.50 PFC Level:
    Reconstruction of runway 22L.
    Rehabilitation of taxiway N.
    Access control to the airport operations area from terminal and
ancillary buildings.
    Access control data storage and server capacity enhancements.
    Replacement of Fireboat Marine 1.
    Terminal E gate department area modifications and baggage system
upgrades.
    Terminal A development.
    Brief Description of Projects Partially Approved for Collection at
a $4.50 PFC Level:
    Airfield electrical system upgrades.
    Terminal C checkpoint consolidation.
    Determination: The public agency requested a PFC amount and project
scope for each project above what was originally consulted without
providing for new consultation on the increased amount and/or scope.
Therefore, the approved amount and scope of each project is limited to
the amount and scope previously provided during the consultation and
public notice process.
    Decision Date: April 25, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Priscilla Scott, New England Region
Airports Division,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: Montana Aeronautics Division, Helena, Montana.
    Application Number: 11-01-C-00-VVYS.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $277,202.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: June 1, 2011.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: June 1, 2025.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFCs: Air taxi/
commercial operators filing FAA Form 1800-31.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information submitted in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the proposed
class

accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements at
West Yellowstone Regional Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:
    Rehabilitate apron.
    Rehabilitate runway 01/19.
    Improve terminal building.
    Acquire handicap passenger lift device.
    Rehabilitate runway 01/19--phase 2.
    Install runway vertical/visual guidance system.
    Acquire aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicle.
    Install perimeter fencing.
    Install weather reporting equipment.
    Improve terminal building.
    Install weather reporting equipment.
    Install enhanced taxiway markings.
    Decision Date: April 28, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Stelling, Helena Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

                                           Amendments to PFC Approvals
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Original     Amended      Original     Amended
                                                  Amendment     approved     approved    estimated    estimated
           Amendment No., city, state              approved     net PFC      net PFC    charge exp.  charge exp.
                                                     date       revenue      revenue        date         date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
01-01-C-03-LCH Lake Charles, LA................     04/06/11   $1,377,234   $1,877,234     10/01/09     10/01/11
01-04-C-01-EUG Eugene, OR......................     04/06/11    3,155,267    2,812,313     01/01/04     01/01/04
08-04-0-01-MFE McAllen, TX*....................     04/11/11    3,460,375    3,460,375     10/01/13     06/01/13
03-03-0-01-SBN South Bend, IN*.................     04/15/11   23,898,229   23,898,229     10/01/21     01/01/21
06-07-C-02-GJT Grand Junction, CO..............     04/18/11    8,330,000   15,857,760     08/01/23     01/01/24
01-04-C-01-CIC Chico, CA.......................     04/21/11      536,747      468,782     12/01/09     12/01/09
01-03-C-02-GTF Great Falls, MT.................     04/21/11    8,501,340    8,826,161     09/01/18     08/01/18
04-05-C-01-ASE Aspen, CO.......................     04/22/11    2,274,162    2,286,161     06/01/09     11/01/09
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notes: The amendments denoted by an asterisk (*) include a
change to the PFC level charged from $3.00 per enplaned passenger to
$4.50 per enplaned passenger. For McAllen, TX, this change is
effective on June 1, 2011. For South Bend, IN, this change is
effective on July 1, 2011.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 5, 2011.
Joe Hebert,
Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger Facility Charge Branch.
[FR Doc. 2011-11572 Filed 5-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 225 (Friday, November 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55892-55894]
[FR Doc No: 2017-25357]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-82113; File No. SR-BOX-2017-35]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Rule 7300

November 17, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on November 8, 2017, BOX Options Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 7300. The text of the proposed
rule change is available from the principal office of the Exchange, at
the Commission's Public Reference Room and also on the Exchange's
Internet Web site at http://boxoptions.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 7300. Specifically, the
Exchange is proposing to amend how the quoting requirements for
Preferred Market Makers \3\ are calculated. A Preferred Market Maker
must maintain a continuous two-sided market, pursuant to Rule
8050(c)(1), throughout the trading day, in 99% of the non-adjusted
option series of each class for which it accepts Preferenced Orders,\4\
for 90% of the time the Exchange is open for trading in each such
option class.\5\ Compliance with the Preferred Market Maker quoting
requirement is determined on a monthly basis; however, determining
compliance with this requirement on a monthly basis does not relieve a
Preferred Market Maker from meeting this quoting requirement on a daily
basis, nor does it prohibit the Exchange from taking disciplinary
action against a Preferred Market Maker for failing to meet this
requirement each trading day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The term ``Preferred Market Maker'' means a Market Maker
designated as such by a Participant with respect to an order
submitted by such Participant to BOX. See Rule 7300(a)(2).
    \4\ The term ``Preferenced Order'' means any order, whether on a
single option instrument or on a Complex Order Strategy, for which a
Preferred Market Maker is designated with respect to such order,
upon submission of such order to BOX. See Rule 7300(a)(1).
    \5\ For purposes of this requirement, a Preferred Market Maker
is not required to quote in intra-day add-on series or series that
have a time to expiration of nine months or more in the classes for
which it receives Preferenced Orders and a Market Maker may still be
a Preferred Market Maker in any such series if the Market Maker
otherwise complies with the requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, the Exchange applies the quoting requirements on a
class-by-class basis. The Exchange is now proposing that compliance
with the quoting requirements apply to all of a Preferred Market
Maker's classes for which it receives Preferenced Orders collectively.
This change is being proposed as a competitive response to the rules of
another exchange.\6\ The Exchange is not proposing any change to the
actual quoting requirements, only to how the requirements are applied
to Preferred Market Makers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See CBOE Rule 8.13(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that applying the continuous electronic
quoting requirements for Preferred Market Makers collectively across
all classes is a fair and efficient way for the Exchange and market
participants to evaluate compliance with the continuous electronic
quoting obligation. Applying the continuous electronic quoting
requirements collectively across all classes rather than on a class-by-
class basis is beneficial to Preferred Market Makers by providing some
flexibility to choose which series in their appointed classes they will
continuously electronically quote--increasing the continuous electronic
quoting in the series of one class while allowing for a decrease in the
continuous electronic quoting in the series of another class. This
flexibility, however, does not diminish the Preferred Market Maker's
obligation to continuously electronically quote in a significant
percentage of series for a significant part of the trading day. This
flexibility is especially important for classes that have relatively
few series and may prevent a Preferred Market Maker from reaching the
continuous electronic quoting obligation when failing to quote 90% of
the trading day in more than one series in an appointed class. The
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will not diminish, and
may in fact increase, market making activity on the Exchange, by
applying continuous electronic quoting obligations in a reasonable
manner, which is already in place on other options exchanges.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See e.g., Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'') Rule 713, Supplementary
Material .03 and Rule 804(e); and NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'')
Options Rule 6.88-O.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the

requirements of Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\8\ in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ in
particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general to protect investors and the
public interest. In particular, the proposed change will more closely
align how the Exchange applies the quoting requirements for Preferred
Market Makers with another options exchange.\10\ The Exchange believes
the proposed change will provide increased flexibility to Preferred
Market Makers in their ability to provide liquidity, which in turn,
will benefit the public.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \10\ See supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to the application of continuous electronic quoting
obligations collectively, the Exchange believes that providing
Preferred Market Makers with flexibility to satisfy their continuous
electronic quoting obligations collectively across their appointed
classes will not diminish Preferred Market Makers' obligations to
provide continuous electronic quotes in a significant percentage of
series for a significant part of the trading day. BOX believes that the
balance between the obligations imposed on and benefits provided to
Preferred Market Makers under the rules is appropriate. The proposed
rule change does not diminish any of the obligations imposed on
Preferred Market Makers. Rather, it merely changes how the continuous
electronic quoting obligation is applied. The Exchange notes that
Preferred Market Makers are subject to many obligations under the
rules, including the obligation to satisfy bid/ask differential
requirements, to meet minimum quote size requirements, and to
contribute to the maintenance of a fair and orderly market in their
appointed classes, which the Exchange believes will ensure continued
liquidity on the Exchange. BOX believes that its proposed rule change
is consistent with the Act in that providing flexibility does not
detract from the overall market making obligations of Preferred Market
Makers. The proposed rule change better supports a Preferred Market
Maker's continuous obligation to engage in dealings for its own
account. Accordingly, any benefits of the proposed rule change to
provide flexibility to Preferred Market Makers are offset by the
continued responsibilities to provide significant liquidity to the
market to the benefit of all market participants.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As discussed above, the
proposed change simply aligns the rules of the Exchange with those of
other options exchanges.\11\ Additionally, the proposed change is only
amending how the quoting obligations are calculated; not the quoting
obligations themselves.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \12\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-BOX-2017-35 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2017-35. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., located at
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will
be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2017-35 and should be
submitted on or before December 15, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-25357 Filed 11-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: October 2, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 192)]
[Notices]
[Page 57346]
[DOCID:fr02oc08-54]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EG08-75-000; EG08-76-000; FC08-6-000; FC08-7-000; FC08-8-
000; FC08-9-000]

Notrees Windpower, LP; Windthorst-1, LLC; SunEdison
International, LLC; P.P.C. Limited; Atlantic Equipment & Power (Turks
and Caicos) Ltd.; Belize Electric Company Limited; Notice of
Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator or Foreign Utility Company
Status

September 26, 2008.
    Take notice that during the month of August 2008, the status of the
above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign
Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's
regulations 18 CFR 366.7(a).

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-23212 Filed 10-1-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P