[Federal Register: April 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 68)]
[Notices]
[Page 18196-18198]
[DOCID:fr09ap10-70]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP10-3-000; CP10-3-001]

Questar Overthrust Pipeline Company; Amended Notice of Intent To
Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Mainline 133 Loop
Expansion Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues

March 30, 2010.
    As previously noticed on April 10, 2009, and amended herein, the
staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission)
will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will discuss the
environmental impacts of the Mainline 133 Loop Expansion Project (Loop
Expansion Project), involving construction and operation of facilities
by Questar Overthrust Pipeline Company (Overthrust) in Uinta and
Sweetwater Counties, Wyoming. This EA will be used by the Commission in
its decision-making process to determine whether the project is in the
public convenience and necessity.
    This notice announces the opening of a second scoping period (due
to pipeline route changes in the project design) the Commission will
use to gather input from the public and interested agencies on the
project. Your input will help the Commission staff determine what
issues need to be evaluated in the EA. Please note that the scoping
period will close on April 29, 2010.
    This notice is being sent to the Commission's current environmental
mailing list for this project, as well as newly-affected landowners
along the revised pipeline routes. State and local government
representatives are asked to notify their constituents of this proposed
project and encourage them to comment on their areas of concern.
    If you are a landowner receiving this notice, you may be contacted
by a pipeline company representative about the acquisition of an
easement to construct, operate, and maintain the proposed facilities.
The company would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement.
However, if the project is approved by the Commission, that approval
conveys with it the right of eminent domain. Therefore, if easement
negotiations fail to produce an agreement, the pipeline company could
initiate condemnation proceedings in accordance with State law.
    A fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural
Gas Facility on My Land? What Do I Need

To Know?'' was attached to the project notice Overthrust provided to
landowners. This fact sheet addresses a number of typically-asked
questions, including the use of eminent domain and how to participate
in the Commission's proceedings. It is also available for viewing on
the FERC Web site (http://www.ferc.gov).

Summary of the Proposed Project

    Overthrust proposes to construct the following facilities:
     About 43 miles of 36-inch-diameter pipeline in Uinta and
Sweetwater Counties, Wyoming;
     A bypass valve assembly tie-in at the Rock Springs
Compressor Station in Rock Springs, Wyoming;
     A new crossover valve assembly at about milepost (MP)
43.3; and
     Two 36-inch-diameter block valves at about MPs 18.6 and
38.5.
    The Loop Expansion Project would allow Overthrust to provide up to
800,000 dekatherms per day of natural gas westbound to Kern River Gas
Transmission Company and to El Paso Corporation's proposed Ruby
Pipeline.
    Since issuance of our \1\ April 10, 2009 notice, Overthrust has
changed its proposed 43-mile-long pipeline route in two locations to
address concerns by General Chemical (Soda Ash) Partners (General
Chemical) and FMC Corporation (FMC) regarding impacts on active mining
operations in the project area. Overthrust revised its route from MP
19.7 to 26 and MP 30.2 to 38.4 to avoid and/or mitigate impacts in the
General Chemical and FMC mining areas, respectively. These revised
sections are similar in length and are within proximity to the
originally-proposed sections of the pipeline route.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ ``We'', ``us'', and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the Commission's Office of Energy Projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The general location of the originally-proposed route and the
revised sections are shown in the appendix.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The appendix referenced in this notice is not being printed
in the Federal Register. Copies of the appendix were sent to all
those receiving this notice in the mail and are available at http://
www.ferc.gov using the link called ``eLibrary'' or from the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, or call<PHONE_NUMBER>. For instructions on
connecting to eLibrary, refer to page 6 of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Land Requirements for Construction

    Construction of Overthrust's proposed facilities would disturb
about 833 acres of land including aboveground facilities and the
pipeline. Overthrust would use existing public roads to access the work
areas. Following construction, about 262.3 acres would be maintained
for permanent operation of the project's facilities while the remaining
acreage would be restored and allowed to revert to former uses. About
90 percent (39.1 miles) of the pipeline would be collocated with
existing pipeline, utility, or road rights-of-ways.

The EA Process

    The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could
result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us
to discover and address concerns the public may have about proposals.
This process is referred to as scoping. The main goal of the scoping
process is to focus the analysis in the EA on the important
environmental issues. By this notice, the Commission requests public
comments on the scope of the issues to address in the EA. All comments
received will be considered during the preparation of the EA.
    In the EA we will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of
the construction and operation of the proposed project under these
general headings:
     Geology and soils;
     Land use;
     Water resources, fisheries, and wetlands;
     Cultural resources;
     Vegetation and wildlife;
     Air quality and noise;
     Endangered and threatened species; and
     Public safety.
    We will also evaluate reasonable alternatives to the proposed
project or portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to
lessen or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
    Our independent analysis of the issues will be presented in the EA.
The EA will be placed in the public record and will be published and
distributed to the public. A comment period will be allotted for public
review when the EA is published. We will consider all comments on the
EA before we make our recommendations to the Commission. To ensure your
comments are considered, please carefully follow the instructions in
the Public Participation section below.
    With this notice, we are asking agencies with jurisdiction and/or
special expertise with respect to environmental issues to formally
cooperate with us in the preparation of the EA. These agencies may
choose to participate once they have evaluated the proposal relative to
their responsibilities. Agencies that would like to request cooperating
agency status should follow the instructions for filing comments
provided under the Public Participation section of this notice.
Currently, the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Land Management
has expressed its intention to participate as a cooperating agency in
the preparation of the EA to satisfy its NEPA responsibilities related
to this project.

Consultations Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act

    In accordance with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
implementing regulations for the section 106 process, we are using this
notice to solicit the views of the public on the project's potential
effects on historic properties.\3\ We will document our findings on the
impacts on cultural resources and summarize the status of consultations
under section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act in our EA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations
are at Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 800. Historic
properties are defined in those regulations as any prehistoric or
historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in
or eligible for inclusion in the National Register for Historic
Places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Currently Identified Environmental Issues

    We have already identified several issues that we think deserve
attention based on a preliminary review of the revised facilities and
the environmental information provided by Overthrust. This preliminary
list of issues may be changed based on your comments and our analysis:
     Geologic concerns in the active mining areas, and
     Cultural resources.

Public Participation

    You can make a difference by providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the project. Your comments should focus on
the potential environmental effects, reasonable alternatives, and
measures to avoid or lessen environmental impacts. The more specific
your comments, the more useful they will be. To ensure that your
comments are timely and properly recorded, please send your comments so
that they will be received in Washington, DC on or before April 29,
2010.
    For your convenience, there are three methods you can use to submit
your comments to the Commission. The Commission encourages electronic
filing of comments and has expert eFiling staff available to assist you
at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

    (1) You may file your comments electronically by using the Quick
Comment feature, which is located at http://www.ferc.gov under the link
called Documents and Filings. A Quick Comment is an easy method for
interested persons to submit text-only comments on a project;
    (2) You may file your comments electronically by using the
``eFiling'' feature that is listed under the Documents and Filings
link. eFiling involves preparing your submission in the same manner as
you would if filing on paper, and then saving the file on your
computer's hard drive. You will attach that file to your submission.
New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking on the links
called Sign up or eRegister. You will be asked to select the type of
filing you are making. A comment on a particular project is considered
a ``Comment on a Filing''; or
    (3) You may file a paper copy of your comments at the following
address: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.

Environmental Mailing List

    The environmental mailing list includes General Chemical and FMC;
Federal, State, and local government representatives and agencies;
elected officials; environmental and public interest groups; Native
American Tribes; and local libraries and newspapers. This list also
includes all affected landowners (as defined in the Commission's
regulations) who are potential right-of-way grantors, whose property
may be used temporarily for project purposes, or who own homes within
certain distances of aboveground facilities, and anyone who submits
comments on the project. We will update the environmental mailing list
as the analysis proceeds to ensure that we send the information related
to this environmental review to all individuals, organizations, and
government entities interested in and/or potentially affected by the
proposed project. When the EA is published for distribution, copies
will be sent to the environmental mailing list for public review and
comment.

Becoming an Intervenor

    In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want
to become an ``intervenor'' which is an official party to the
Commission's proceeding. Intervenors play a more formal role in the
process and are able to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be heard
by the courts if they choose to appeal the Commission's final ruling.
An intervenor formally participates in the proceeding by filing a
request to intervene. Instructions for becoming an intervenor are
included in the User's Guide under the ``e-filing'' link on the
Commission's Web site.

Additional Information

    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. Click on
the eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the docket
number, excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field
(i.e., CP10-3). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range.
For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries and direct links to
the documents. Go to http://www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm.
    Finally, any public meetings or site visits related to this project
will be posted on the Commission's calendar located at http://
www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along with other related
information.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-8057 Filed 4-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76109-76112]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31020]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-68481; File No. SR-ICC-2012-23]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change to Add Rules Related to the Clearing of
iTraxx Europe Index CDS

December 19, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 6, 2012, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICC'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been prepared primarily by ICC. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to adopt new rules that
will provide the basis for ICC to clear additional credit default swap
contracts. Specifically, ICC is proposing to amend Chapters 8, 20 and
26 and Schedule 401 and Schedule 502 of its rules as well as make
corresponding changes to the applicable ICC Policies and Procedures to
provide for the clearance of iTraxx Europe Index CDS (``iTraxx
Contracts'').
    ICC proposes to amend Chapter 8 of its rules to provide for an
additional Guaranty Fund Contribution by those Clearing Participants
that present Specific Wrong Way Risk (i.e., the risk that arises from
the fact that iTraxx Contracts include, in part, the names of certain
Clearing Participants or Clearing Participant affiliates). In a default
scenario, if the defaulting Clearing Participant has funded a Specific
Wrong Way Risk Contribution, the Specific Wrong Way Risk Contributions
of all contributing Clearing Participants would be used immediately
following the defaulting Clearing Participant's funds to cure deficits
related to the default.

    ICC proposes to amend Chapter 20 of its rules to remove definitions
that are included in Chapter 26E of the rules as well as to include the
Specific WWR Guaranty Fund Contribution, as appropriate, as a portion
of Clearing Participant funds.
    ICC proposes to amend Section 26E of its rules to include certain
additional provisions relevant to the treatment of restructuring credit
events under iTraxx and standard single-name CDS Contracts referencing
European corporate reference entities (``European SN Contracts'').
    ICC proposes to add Section 26F to provide for the clearance of the
iTraxx Contracts, which reference the iTraxx Europe corporate index. As
discussed in more detail in Item II.A below, new Section 26F of the ICC
rules provides for the definitions and certain specific contract terms
for cleared iTraxx Contracts.
    ICC will update Schedule 401 of its Rules (Eligible Collateral &
Thresholds), as applicable, with respect to Initial Margin and Guaranty
Fund liquidity requirements for Non-Client and Client-Related positions
for both US Dollar and Euro denominated products.
    ICC will also update Schedule 502 of its Rules (Cleared Products
List) to incorporate the additional cleared products. Upon Commission
approval, ICC will list the following European Indices: Markit iTraxx
Europe Main Series 18 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on December 20,
2017; Markit iTraxx Europe Main Series 18 with a 10-year maturity,
maturing on December 20, 2022; Markit iTraxx Europe Main Series 17 with
a 5-year maturity, maturing on June 20, 2017; Markit iTraxx Europe Main
Series 17 with a 10-year maturity, maturing on June 20, 2022; Markit
iTraxx Europe Main Series 16 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on
December 20, 2016; Markit iTraxx Europe Main Series 16 with a 10-year
maturity, maturing on December 20, 2021; Markit iTraxx Europe Main
Series 15 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on June 20, 2016; Markit
iTraxx Europe Main Series 15 with a 10-year maturity, maturing on June
20, 2021; Markit iTraxx Europe Main Series 14 with a 5-year maturity,
maturing on December 20, 2015; Markit iTraxx Europe Main Series 14 with
a 10-year maturity, maturing on December 20, 2020; Markit iTraxx Europe
Main Series 13 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on June, 20, 2015;
Markit iTraxx Europe Main Series 13 with a 10-year maturity, maturing
on June, 20, 2020; Markit iTraxx Europe Main Series 12 with a 5-year
maturity, maturing on December 20, 2014; Markit iTraxx Europe Main
Series 12 with a 10-year maturity, maturing on December 20, 2019;
Markit iTraxx Europe Main Series 11 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on
June 20, 2014; Markit iTraxx Europe Main Series 11 with a 10-year
maturity, maturing on June 20, 2019; Markit iTraxx Europe Main Series
10 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on December 20, 2013; Markit iTraxx
Europe Main Series 10 with a 10-year maturity, maturing on December 20,
2018; Markit iTraxx Europe Main Series 9 with a 5-year maturity,
maturing on June 20, 2013; Markit iTraxx Europe Main Series 9 with a
10-year maturity, maturing on June 20, 2018; Markit iTraxx Europe Main
Series 8 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on December 20, 2012; Markit
iTraxx Europe Main Series 8 with a 10-year maturity, maturing on
December 20, 2017; Markit iTraxx Europe Main Series 7 with a 10-year
maturity, maturing June 20, 2017; Markit iTraxx Crossover Series 18
with a 5-year maturity, maturing on December 20, 2017; Markit iTraxx
Crossover Series 17 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on June 20, 2017;
Markit iTraxx Crossover Series 16 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on
December 20, 2016; Markit iTraxx Crossover Series 15 with a 5-year
maturity, maturing on June 20, 2016; Markit iTraxx Crossover Series 14
with a 5-year maturity, maturing on December 20, 2015; Markit iTraxx
Crossover Series 13 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on June, 20, 2015;
Markit iTraxx Crossover Series 12 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on
December 20, 2014; Markit iTraxx Crossover Series 11 with a 5-year
maturity, maturing on June 20, 2014; Markit iTraxx Crossover Series 10
with a 5-year maturity, maturing on December 20, 2013; Markit iTraxx
Crossover Series 9 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on June 20, 2013;
Markit iTraxx HiVol Series 18 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on
December 20, 2017; Markit iTraxx HiVol Series 17 with a 5-year
maturity, maturing on June 20, 2017; Markit iTraxx HiVol Series 16 with
a 5-year maturity, maturing on December 20, 2016; Markit iTraxx HiVol
Series 15 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on June 20, 2016; Markit
iTraxx HiVol Series 14 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on December 20,
2015; Markit iTraxx HiVol Series 13 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on
June, 20, 2015; Markit iTraxx HiVol Series 12 with a 5-year maturity,
maturing on December 20, 2014; Markit iTraxx HiVol Series 11 with a 5-
year maturity, maturing on June 20, 2014; Markit iTraxx HiVol Series 10
with a 5-year maturity, maturing on December 20, 2013; Markit iTraxx
HiVol Series 9 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on June 20, 2013; and
Markit iTraxx HiVol Series 8 with a 5-year maturity, maturing on
December 20, 2012.
    ICC also updated its Policies and Procedures to provide for the
clearance of iTraxx Contracts, specifically the ICC Treasury Operations
Policies & Procedures, ICC Risk Management Framework and ICC End-of-Day
(``EOD'') Price Discovery Policies and Procedures.
    Consistent with the changes to Schedule 401 of the ICC Rules, the
ICC Treasury Operations Policies & Procedures have been updated to
include Initial Margin and Guaranty Fund liquidity requirements for
Non-Client and Client-Related positions for both US Dollar and Euro
denominated products. In order to accommodate the return of funds
during London banking hours, the ICC Treasury Operations Policies &
Procedures have been updated to require requests for Euro withdrawals
to be submitted by 9:00 a.m. Eastern.
    The ICC Risk Management Framework has been updated to account for
Euro denominated portfolios. Specifically, updates have been made to
the Guaranty Fund, Initial Margin and Mark-to-Market Methodologies to
address: Wrong Way Risk, Foreign Exchange Risk, Liquidity Risk, Time
Zone Risk, and Operational Risk. Additionally, the Portfolio Approach
was updated to include appropriate portfolio benefits between North
American CDS Indices and iTraxx Contracts.
    The ICC EOD Price Discovery Policies and Procedures has been
updated to provide that ICC will use ICE Clear Europe's EOD prices for
iTraxx Contracts and rely on the ICE Clear Europe Firm Trade process to
ensure the accuracy of price submissions. ICC will extend the risk
time-horizon for iTraxx Contracts to account for the half day
difference, on average, between the EOD price discovery process
timings. The extended risk horizon accounts for the fact that European
markets close earlier and new financial information may be reflected
only in the North American instrument prices and not reflected in the
iTraxx Contracts, in general.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, ICC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements

may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. ICC has
prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of these statements.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries
prepared by ICE Clear Credit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    ICC has identified iTraxx Contracts as products that have become
increasingly important for market participants to manage risk and
express views with respect to European corporate credit risk. ICC's
clearance of these Contracts will facilitate the prompt and accurate
settlement of swaps and contribute to the safeguarding of securities
and funds associated with swap transactions. In addition, ICC notes
that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has determined that
iTraxx Europe CDS contracts would be subject to mandatory clearing
under Section 2(h) of the Commodity Exchange Act.
    iTraxx Contracts have similar terms to the CDX North American Index
CDS contracts (``CDX.NA Contracts'') and CDX Emerging Market Index
(``CDX.EM Contracts'') currently cleared by ICC and governed by
Sections 26A and 26C of the ICC rules. Accordingly, the proposed rules
found in Section 26F largely mirror the ICC rules for those Contracts,
with certain modifications that reflect the underlying reference
entities (European corporate reference entities instead of North
American corporate or Latin American sovereign entities) and
differences in terms and market conventions. The iTraxx Contracts
reference the iTraxx Europe index, the current series of which consists
of 125 European corporate reference entities. iTraxx Contracts,
consistent with market convention and widely used standard terms
documentation, can be triggered by credit events for failure to pay,
bankruptcy and restructuring. iTraxx Contracts will be denominated in
Euro.
    Rule 26F-102 (Definitions) sets forth the definitions used for the
iTraxx Contract Rules. An ``Eligible iTraxx Europe Untranched Index''
is defined as ``each particular series and version of an iTraxx Europe
index or sub-index, as published by the iTraxx Untranched Publisher,
included from time to time in the List of Eligible iTraxx Untranched
Indexes,'' which is a list maintained, updated and published from time
to time by the ICC Board of Managers or its designee, containing
certain specified information with respect to each index. ``iTraxx
Europe Untranched Terms Supplement'' refers to the market standard form
of documentation used for credit default swaps on the iTraxx Europe
index, which is incorporated by reference into the contract
specifications in Chapter 26F. The remaining definitions are
substantially the same as the definitions found in ICC Section 26A and
Section 26C, other than certain conforming changes.
    Rules 26F-309 (Acceptance of iTraxx Europe Untranched Contracts by
ICE Clear Credit), 26F-315 (Terms of the Cleared iTraxx Europe
Untranched Contract), and 26F-316 (Updating Index Version of Fungible
Contracts After a Credit Event or a Succession Event; Updating Relevant
Untranched Standard Terms Supplement) reflect or incorporate the basic
contract specifications for iTraxx Contracts and are substantially the
same as under ICC Section 26A for CDX.NA Contracts and ICC Section 26C
for CDX.EM Contracts. In addition to various non-substantive conforming
changes, proposed Rule 26F-317 (Terms of iTraxx Europe Untranched
Contracts) differs from the corresponding Rule 26A-317 to reflect the
fact that restructuring is a credit event for the iTraxx Contract.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The provisions dealing with the ``spin-out'' of a single
name CDS following a restructuring credit event for a component of
the iTraxx Europe index are part of the iTraxx Europe Untranched
Standard Terms Supplement (Nov. 2009 edition), which is incorporated
into the contract specifications for cleared iTraxx Europe contracts
through proposed ICC Rule 26F-315(c). Specifically, Section 7.3(b)
of the Supplement addresses the removal of the restructured
reference entity from the index and continuation of that component
as a separate contract. (Proposed ICC Rule 26F-317(h) clarifies the
treatment of the reference obligation for that separate cleared
contract.) This is part of the basic standard terms of the iTraxx
Europe contract and operates the same way in both the cleared and
uncleared contexts (much like other aspects of the market standard
terms supplements and/or ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions on
which other cleared and uncleared CDS trade).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, ICC proposes to make conforming changes in Section 26E
of the Rules (the CDS Restructuring Rules), principally to address the
particular restructuring terms that apply to iTraxx Contracts and
European SN Contracts. Specifically, ICC proposes to modify the notice
delivery procedures in Rule 26E-104 to include ``notices to exercise
movement option'' under the Mod Mod R terms. In addition, the
definition of ``Triggered Restructuring CDS Contract'' has been
modified to reflect that under Mod Mod R terms a CDS contract may be
triggered in part following a restructuring credit event.
    Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \5\ requires, among other things,
that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to promote the prompt
and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and,
to the extent applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and
transactions. ICC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to ICC, in particular, to Section 17(A)(b)(3)(F),
because ICC believes that the clearance of iTraxx Contracts will
facilitate the prompt and accurate settlement of swaps and contribute
to the safeguarding of securities and funds associated with swap
transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    ICC does not believe the proposed rule change would have any
impact, or impose any burden, on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been
solicited or received. ICC will notify the Commission of any written
comments received by ICC.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml) or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-ICC-2012-23 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICC-2012-23. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of ICE Clear Credit
and on ICE Clear Credit's Web site at https://www.theice.com/publicdocs/regulatory_filings/ICEClearCredit_120512.pdf.

    All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICC-2012-23
and should be submitted on or before January 16, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-31020 Filed 12-21-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: December 21, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 243)]
[Notices]
[Page 67937-67938]
[DOCID:fr21de09-98]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

In the Matter of American Sports Development Group, Inc.,
Cybernet Internet Services International, Inc., Cyper Media, Inc.,
Frisby Technologies, Inc., Graphco Holdings Corp., Investors Insurance
Group, Inc., ITC Learning Corp., and Speizman Industries, Inc.; Order
of Suspension of Trading

December 17, 2009.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
American Sports Development Group, Inc. because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended December 31, 2003.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Cybernet Internet Services International, Inc. because it has not filed
any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2003.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Cyper Media, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since
the period ended March 31, 2004.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Frisby Technologies, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended September 30, 2002.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Graphco Holdings Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended September 30, 2003.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Investors

Insurance Group, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended September 30, 2003.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
ITC Learning Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports since
the period ended March 31, 2001.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Speizman Industries, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended December 27, 2003.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered,
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that
trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended
for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on December 17, 2009, through 11:59
p.m. EST on December 31, 2009.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-30359 Filed 12-17-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: August 15, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 159)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 47818]
[DOCID:fr15au08-2]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 26

[Docket No. FAA-2004-18379; Amendment No. 26-0]
RIN 2120-AI31

Enhanced Airworthiness Program for Airplane Systems/Fuel Tank
Safety (EAPAS/FTS); Technical Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule corrects a subpart heading in the Code of
Federal Regulations. The heading was inadvertently misstated when the
FAA published the rule in November 2007.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective August 15, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Annette K. Kovite, ANM-113,
Standardization Branch, Federal Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, facsimile: 425-
227-1320, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On November 8, 2007, the FAA published a final rule to establish
part 26 in the Code of Federal Regulations (72 FR 63364). The heading
for subpart B of that part contained the phrase ``aging systems''
instead of the intended ``airplane systems.'' This final rule corrects
that error.

Justification for Immediate Adoption

    Because this action corrects merely a typographical error, the FAA
finds that notice and public comment under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) is
unnecessary. For the same reason, the FAA finds that good cause exists
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d) for making this rule effective upon publication.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 26

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Continued airworthiness.

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends Chapter I of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations part 26 as
follows:

PART 26--CONTINUED AIRWORTHINESS AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRANSPORT CATEGORY AIRPLANES

0
1. The authority citation for part 26 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702 and 44704.

Subpart B--Enhanced Airworthiness Program for Airplane Systems

0
2. The heading for subpart B is revised to read as set forth above.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 11, 2008.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking, Aviation Safety.
[FR Doc. E8-18859 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30729-30730]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13959]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP18-503-000]

ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket
Authorization

    Take notice that on June 14, 2018, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 700
Louisiana Street, Suite 700, Houston, Texas 77002-2700, filed in Docket
No. CP18-503-000 a prior notice request pursuant to sections 157.205,
157.208, and 157.216 of the Commission's regulations under the Natural
Gas Act (NGA), and ANR's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-
480-000, to abandon 20 injection/withdrawal wells, one observation
well, and related appurtenances in its Winfield Storage Field, located
in Mecosta and Montcalm Counties Michigan (Winfield Storage Field Wells
Abandonment Project).
    ANR states that the well integrity risk assessments for these wells
revealed integrity weaknesses, and to maintain these wells would
require some form of remediation, the cost of which would likely exceed
the cost of plugging, as well as exceed the value provided by the wells
to storage operations. ANR claims many of the wells proposed for
abandonment are poor performers in comparison with other wells in the
Winfield Storage Field, contributing approximately 2.8 percent of the
total field deliverability. Therefore, ANR concludes that plugging and
abandoning the wells is the best course of action to maintain field
integrity and efficiency. ANR affirms that there will be no change to
the field's total inventory, reservoir pressure, reservoir and buffer
boundaries, or the certificated capacity as a result of the proposed
Winfield Storage Field Wells Abandonment Project. ANR estimates the
cost of the Project to be approximately $2.8 million, all as more fully
set forth in the application which is on file with the Commission and
open to public inspection. The filing may also be viewed on the web at
http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link.

Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket
number field to access the document. For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at [email protected] or toll free at (866)
208-3676, or TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to Linda
Farquhar, Manager, Project Determinations & Regulatory Administration,
ANR Pipeline Company, 700 Louisiana Street, Suite 700, Houston, Texas
77002-2700, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, by facsimile at (832) 320-
6685, or by email at [email protected].
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 60 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to section 157.205 of
the regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to the
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and
not withdrawn within 30 days after the allowed time for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to section 7 of the NGA.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules (18 CFR 157.9),
within 90 days of this Notice, the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the EA for this proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's
public record for this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and
state agencies of the timing for the completion of all necessary
reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations
within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's EA.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters, will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at
http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and seven copies of the protest or intervention to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426.

    Dated: June 22, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-13959 Filed 6-28-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 17, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 52)]
[Notices]
[Page 14240]
[DOCID:fr17mr08-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL08-11-002]

TransCanada Power Marketing Ltd. v. ISO New England Inc.; Notice
of Filing

March 10, 2008.
    Take notice that on March 3, 2008, in compliance with the
Commission's January 4, 2008 Order, TransCanada Power Marketing Ltd. v.
ISO New England Inc., 122 FERC ] 61,010 (2008), ISO New England Inc.
filed tariff sheets containing revisions to Section III.13.1.6 of the
Transmission, Markets and Services Tariff, FERC Electric No. 3.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll-free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 24, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-5234 Filed 3-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10256-10258]
[FR Doc No: 2023-03415]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R10-OAR-2022-0753, FRL-10190-01-R10]

Air Plan Approval; ID; State Board Composition

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to approve
a revision to the Idaho State Implementation Plan submitted on August
9, 2022. The State of Idaho made the submission to meet the state board
composition requirements of the Clean Air Act.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 20, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10-
OAR-2022-0753, at www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not electronically submit any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information or other information
the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about Confidential Business Information or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making

effective comments, please visit www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Hall, EPA Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue, Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the use of ``we''
is intended to refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. Evaluation
III. Proposed Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    Clean Air Act section 128 requires that each State Implementation
Plan (SIP) include provisions to regulate state boards and agency heads
that approve permits or enforcement orders under the Clean Air Act. The
section has two subsections. The first, 128(a)(1), governs board
composition and requires that at least a majority of board members
represent the public interest and do not derive any significant portion
of income from persons subject to permits or enforcement orders under
the Clean Air Act. The second, 128(a)(2), requires that board members
and agency heads with similar powers adequately disclose any potential
conflicts of interest.
    The current Idaho SIP includes two provisions that were approved by
the EPA as meeting the Clean Air Act state board requirements, most
recently in 2013.\1\ Specifically, we approved the Idaho Governor's
Executive Order regarding Appointment of Members of the Board of
Environmental Quality as meeting the board composition requirements of
section 128(a)(1),\2\ and we approved the Idaho Ethics in Government
Act as meeting the conflict of interest disclosure requirements of
section 128(a)(2).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 78 FR 63394, October 24, 2013.
    \2\ Executive Order 2013-06, dated June 26, 2013, and renewed by
Executive Order 2016-07, dated December 14, 2016.
    \3\ Idaho Code sections 59-701 through 59-705, subsequently
relocated to Idaho Code Title 74 Chapter 4, effective July 1, 2015.
See 84 FR 14067, April 9, 2019 for the EPA's proposed determination
that the relevant, substantive components of the law, approved for
purposes of SIP authority, were retained in the recodification, and
see 85 FR 57723, September 16, 2020, finalizing that rulemaking
action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since that time, the Idaho Legislature updated State statute to
effectively replace the prior executive order. Specifically, the
legislature updated Idaho Code section 39-107, which establishes
requirements to be followed when appointing members to the Idaho Board
of Environmental Quality.\4\ On August 9, 2022, the Idaho Department of
Environmental Quality submitted the statutory revision to the EPA for
approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The EPA first approved this statutory provision into the
Idaho SIP on July 28, 1982 (47 FR 32530), and approved a subsequent
revision on January 16, 2003 (68 FR 2217).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Evaluation

    The revision to Idaho Code section 39-107, at paragraph (1)(a),
adds the requirement that at least four of the seven members of the
Idaho Board of Environmental Quality must represent the public interest
and not derive any significant portion of their income from persons
subject to air quality permits or enforcement orders.
    After reviewing the submission, we have determined that Idaho Code
39-107, State effective July 1, 2022, is consistent with Clean Air Act
section 128(a)(1) requirements.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ We note that Idaho's August 9, 2022 SIP revision addresses
the board composition requirement under CAA section 128(a)(1). The
revision does not affect EPA's prior determination that the Idaho
SIP satisfies CAA section 128(a)(2), and that prior determination is
outside the scope of this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Proposed Action

    The EPA is proposing to approve Idaho's August 9, 2022 SIP revision
as meeting the board composition requirements of Clean Air Act section
128(a)(1). Specifically, we propose to approve and incorporate by
reference Idaho Code 39-107, State effective July 1, 2022, into the
Idaho SIP at 40 CFR 52.670(c).\6\ As discussed in Section II of this
preamble, this statutory provision replaces a prior executive order
issued by the Idaho Governor and approved by the EPA as meeting the
same requirements. Therefore, we are proposing to remove the prior
executive order from the Idaho SIP at 40 CFR 52.670(e).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 40 CFR 52.670(c) consists of EPA approved regulatory
provisions.
    \7\ Executive Order 2013-06, dated June 26, 2013, and renewed by
Executive Order 2016-07, dated December 14, 2016. 40 CFR 52.670(e)
consists of EPA approved nonregulatory provisions and quasi-
regulatory measures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, the EPA is proposing to include in a final rule,
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the provision described in Section III of this preamble. The
EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally
available through regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 10 Office
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely approves State law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by State law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of the requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

    In addition, this proposed rulemaking would not apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area in Idaho where the EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those
areas of Indian country, the proposed rule would not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: February 10, 2023.
Casey Sixkiller,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2023-03415 Filed 2-16-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P