[Federal Register: September 18, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 180)]
[Notices]
[Page 54641]
[DOCID:fr18se06-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL06-89-000]

Californians for Renewable Energy, Inc., Complainants v.
California Independent System Operator, Respondent; Notice of Amended
Complaint

September 8, 2006.
    Take notice that on September 5, 2006, Californians for Renewable
Energy, Inc. (CARE) filed an amendment to its July 24, 2006 complaint
against the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO).
CARE states that it is filing this amendment to provide additional
information describing the violation of due process and equal
protection under the laws of California and the United States federal
government that has occurred during the CEC siting process.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 25, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-15382 Filed 9-15-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 729-731]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32895]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2012 / Rules
and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-1382; Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-053-AD;
Amendment 39-16900; AD 2011-26-10]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Enstrom Helicopter Corporation
Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Enstrom
Helicopter Corporation (Enstrom) Model F-28C, F-28C-2, F-28F, 280C,
280F, 280FX TH-28, 480, and 480B helicopters with certain trim relays
to require modifying and testing the lateral and longitudinal cyclic
trim actuator assemblies. This AD was prompted by four failures in the
cyclic trim system on certain Enstrom model helicopters that resulted
in reduced controllability of the helicopter. These actions are
intended to prevent failure of the cyclic trim system and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.

DATES: This AD becomes effective January 23, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain documents listed in this AD as of January 23,
2012.
    We must receive comments on this AD by March 6, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Examining the AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket
Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the economic
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Enstrom
Helicopter Corporation, 2209 22nd St., Menominee, Michigan, 49858-0490;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Web site: http://www.enstromhelicopter.com/enstrom_new/enstrom_support_tec.html. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory J. Michalik, Enstrom Program
Manager, FAA, Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, 2300 East Devon
Avenue, Room 107, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018; telephone (847) 294-
7135; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to
provide your comments prior to it becoming effective. However, we
invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that resulted
from adopting this AD. The most helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the AD, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain
duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written
comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should
submit them only one time. We will file in the docket all comments that
we receive, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking during the
comment period. We will consider all the comments we receive and may
conduct additional rulemaking based on those comments.

Discussion

    We are adopting a new AD for the Enstrom Model F-28C, F-28C-2, F-
28F, 280C, 280F, 280FX, TH-28, 480, and 480B helicopters with a trim
relay, part-number (P/N) KUP14D55-472, M83536/10-015M, or M83536/10-
024M. This AD does not apply to the specified helicopters with a
reversible trim motor, P/N 28-16621 (Ford Motor Company C1AZ-14553A) or
P/N AD1R-10 (Signal Electric). This AD requires modifying the lateral
and longitudinal trim actuator assemblies by replacing the actuator and
limit switch bracket to provide a positive stop for the trim actuator.
In the event of a trim actuator runaway, the new bracket will stop the
actuator, causing the circuit breaker to trip before any significant
loss of control occurs. After the trim actuator assemblies are
modified, this AD requires performing operational (ground) and flight
tests to determine that the trim relay is working correctly. This AD
was prompted by reports of 4 failures in the cyclic trim system in the
field, 2 that occurred on the Enstrom Model 480B helicopter and 2 that
occurred on the Enstrom Model F28 helicopter. These failures resulted
in reduced controllability of the helicopter. We are issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the cyclic trim system and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter.

FAA's Determination

    We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Related Service Information

    We reviewed Enstrom Service Directive Bulletin (SDB) No. 0110,
Revision 3, dated July 6, 2011 (SDB 0110), for Model F-28C, F-28C-2, F-
28F, 280C, 280F, and 280FX helicopters; and Enstrom SDB No. T-039,
Revision 3, dated July 6, 2011 (SDB T-039), for Model TH-28, 480, and
480B helicopters. SDB 0110 specifies, for helicopters with a trim
relay, P/N KUP14D55-472, M83536/10-015M, or M83536/10-024M, procedures
for modifying the lateral and longitudinal trim actuator assembly using
the cyclic trim assembly kit (modification kit), P/N 28-01063-1, and
specifies performing an operational check and flight test to determine
the trim is operating correctly after the modification. SDB T-039
specifies, for helicopters with a trim relay, P/N M83536/10-024M,
procedures for modifying the lateral and longitudinal trim actuator
assembly using the modification kit, P/N 4230045-1, and specifies
performing an operational check and flight test to determine the trim
is operating correctly after the modification. The SDBs state that the
modification kits contain the upgraded bracket.

AD Requirements

    This AD requires, within 5 hours time-in-service (TIS) or at the
next annual or 100 hour time-in-service inspection, whichever occurs
first, the following actions:
     For the Enstrom Model F-28C, F-28C-2, F-28F, 280C, 280F,
and 280FX helicopters with a trim relay, P/N KUP14D55-472, M83536/10-
015M, or M83536/10-024M, modify the lateral and longitudinal trim
actuator assembly using the modification kit, P/N 28-01063-1.
     For the Enstrom Model TH-28, 480, and 480B helicopter with
a trim relay, P/N M83536/10-024M, modify the lateral and longitudinal
trim actuator assembly using the modification kit, P/N 4230045-1.
     For all affected helicopters, after accomplishing the
modification of the lateral and longitudinal trim actuator assemblies
and before further flight, perform an operational test and flight test
to determine the trim is operating correctly.
    The actions required by this AD are to be accomplished by following
specified portions of the SDBs described previously.

Differences Between This AD and the Service Information

    The SDBs specify, before further flight, to insert a special
addendum into the Emergency Procedures section of the Flight Manual,
and this AD does not require this action.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 207 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. We estimate that operators may incur the following costs in
order to comply with this AD. For Model 480, 480B, and TH-28, modifying
the actuator assembly will require 4 work hours at a cost of $85 per
hour and parts will cost $327; the cost per helicopter will be $667.
For Model 280C, 280F, 280FX, F-28C, F-28C-2, and F-28F, modifying the
actuator assembly will require 4 work hours at a cost of $85 per hour;
parts will cost $383; and the cost per helicopter will be $723.

FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date

    Providing an opportunity for public comments prior to adopting
these AD requirements would delay implementing the safety actions
needed to correct this known unsafe condition. Therefore, we find that
the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment
prior to the adoption of this rule because the required corrective
actions must be accomplished within 5 hours time-in-service, a very
short time period based on the average flight-hour utilization rate of
these helicopters.
    Since an unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate
adoption of this AD, we determined that notice and opportunity for
public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable and contrary to
the public interest and that good cause exists for making this
amendment effective in less than 30 days.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2011-26-10 Enstrom Helicopter Corporation: Amendment 39-16900;
Docket No. FAA-2011-1382; Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-053-AD.

(a) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Enstrom Model F-28C, F-28C-2, F-28F,
280C, 280F, 280FX, TH-28, 480, and 480B helicopters with a trim
relay, part-number (P/N) KUP14D55-472, M83536/10-015M, or M83536/10-
024M, certificated in any category.

    Note 1:  This AD does not apply to the specified helicopters
with a reversible trim motor, P/N 28-16621 (Ford Motor Company C1AZ-
14553A) or P/N AD1R-10 (Signal Electric).

(b) Unsafe Condition

    This AD defines the unsafe condition as a failure in the cyclic
trim system. This condition could result in reduced controllability
of the helicopter and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

(c) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective January 23,
2012.

(d) Compliance

    You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.

(e) Required Actions

    Within 5 hours time-in-service (TIS) or at the next annual or
100 TIS inspection, whichever comes first:
    (1) For the Enstrom Model F-28C, F-28C-2, F-28F, 280C, 280F, and
280FX helicopters, modify the lateral and longitudinal trim actuator
assemblies using the cyclic trim assembly kit (modification kit), P/
N 28-01063-1, in accordance with the instructions in paragraph 6.1
of the Enstrom Service Directive Bulletin (SDB) No. 0110, Revision
3, dated July 6, 2011 (SDB No. 0110 R3), except when the
instructions specify using ``Aeroshell 22 grease'' or ``VC-3 Vibra-
tite thread locker,'' you may use an equivalent product.
    (2) For the Enstrom Model TH-28, 480, and 480B helicopters,
modify the lateral and longitudinal trim actuator assemblies using
the modification kit, P/N 4230045-1, in accordance with the
instructions in paragraph 6.1 of the Enstrom SDB No. T-039, Revision
3, dated July 6, 2011 (SDB No. T-039 R3), except when the
instructions specify using ``Aeroshell 22 grease'' or ``VC-3 Vibra-
tite thread locker,'' you may use an equivalent product, and you are
not required to contact Enstrom Customer Service.
    (3) After modifying the lateral and longitudinal trim actuator
assemblies in accordance with paragraphs (e)(1) or (e)(2) of this
AD, before further flight, operationally test the trim limits in
accordance with paragraph 6.2. of the SDB for your model helicopter,
and determine during a flight test whether there is appropriate trim
authority in accordance with paragraph 6.3. of the SDB for your
model helicopter.

(f) Special Flight Permits

    A one-time special-flight permit may be issued in accordance
with 14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199 provided the helicopter is operated
with the trim system circuit breaker pulled.

(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Gregory J. Michalik, Enstrom
Program Manager, FAA, Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, 2300
East Devon Avenue, Room 107, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018; telephone
(847) 294-7135; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For operations conducted under a Part 119 operating
certificate or under Part 91, Subpart K, we suggest that you notify
your principal inspector or lacking a principal inspector, the
manager of the local flight standards district office or certificate
holding district office before operating any aircraft complying with
this AD through an AMOC.

 (h) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6710: Main Rotor
Control.

 (i) Material Incorporated by Reference

    You must use the specified portions of the following service
information to do the specified actions required by this AD. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of this service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51.
    (2) Enstrom Service Directive Bulletin No. 0110, Revision 3,
dated July 6, 2011, for the Model F-28C, F-28C-2, F-28F, 280C, 280F;
and
    (3) 280FX or Enstrom Service Directive Bulletin No. T-039,
Revision 3, dated July 6, 2011, for the Model TH-28, 480, and 480B.
    (4) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Enstrom Helicopter Corporation, 2209 22nd St., Menominee, Michigan
49858-0490; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Web site: http://www.enstromhelicopter.com/enstrom_new/enstrom_support_tec.html.
    (5) You may review copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137 or at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December 14, 2011.
M. Monica Merritt,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-32895 Filed 1-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: March 3, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 41)]
[Notices]
[Page 9634]
[DOCID:fr03mr10-98]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; Notice of Application for
Special Permits

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: List of applications for special permits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations (49 CFR Part 107,
Subpart B), notice is hereby given that the Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety has received the application described herein. Each
mode of transportation for which a particular special permit is
requested is indicated by a number in the ``Nature of Application''
portion of the table below as follows: 1--Motor vehicle, 2--Rail
freight, 3--Cargo vessel, 4 --Cargo aircraft only, 5--Passenger-
carrying aircraft.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 2, 2010.
    Address Comments To: Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Washington, DC 20590 in triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of
comments is desired, include a self-addressed stamped postcard showing
the special permit number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the applications are
available for inspection in the Records Center, East Building, PHH-30,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, Southeast, Washington, DC or at http://
regulations.gov.
    This notice of receipt of applications for special permit is
published in accordance with Part 107 of the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 18, 2010.
Delmer F. Billings,
Director, Office of Hazardous Materials, Special Permits and Approvals.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Regulation(s)     Nature of special permits
    Application No.        Docket No.           Applicant              affected                 thereof
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               NEW SPECIAL PERMITS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14951-N...............  ................  Lincoln Composites,    49 CFR 173.302a.....  To authorize the
                                           Lincoln, NE.                                 manufacture, marking,
                                                                                sale and use of non-DOT
                                                                                specification fully
                                                                                wrapped fiber reinforced
                                                                                composite gas cylinders
                                                                                for the transportation
                                                                                of certain compressed
                                                                                gases. (mode 1)
14965-N...............  ................  JiangXi Oxygen Plant   49 CFR 178.276......  To authorize the
                                           Co., Ltd., Jiangxi                           manufacture, marking,
                                           Province.                                    sale and use of non-DOT
                                                                                specification portable
                                                                                tanks mounted within an
                                                                                ISO frame that have been
                                                                                designed, constructed
                                                                                and stamped in
                                                                                accordance with Section
                                                                                VIII, Division 2 of the
                                                                                ASME Code. (modes 1, 2,
                                                                                3)
14966-N...............  ................  Vulcore Industrial     49 CFR 173.302 and    To authorize the
                                           LLC, Fort Wayne, IN.   180.205.              manufacture, marking,
                                                                                sale and use of non-DOT
                                                                                specification cylinders
                                                                                for the transportation
                                                                                of compressed air for
                                                                                use in self-contained
                                                                                breathing apparatus.
                                                                                (modes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
14967-N...............  ................  GFS Chemicals, Inc.,   49 CFR 171-180......  To authorize the one-time
                                           Columbus, OH.                                transportation in
                                                                                commerce of certain
                                                                                hazardous materials to a
                                                                                new site to be
                                                                                transported as
                                                                                essentially unregulated.
                                                                                (mode 1)
14969-N...............  ................  Pace Air Freight,      49 CFR 173.196 and    To authorize the one-way
                                           Inc., Plainfield, IN.  178.609.              transportation in
                                                                                commerce of certain
                                                                                Category A infectious
                                                                                substances in
                                                                                alternative packaging
                                                                                (freezers) by motor
                                                                                vehicle. (mode 1)
14971-N...............  ................  Northrop Grumman       49 CFR 173.24.......  To allow the controlled
                                           Corporation,                                 release of nitrogen and
                                           Baltimore, MD.                               air from a cylinder
                                                                                during transportation to
                                                                                maintain an inert
                                                                                atmosphere in a shipping
                                                                                container to protect the
                                                                                electronic sensors for a
                                                                                satellite. (mode 1)
14973-N...............  ................  NEC Corporation,       49 CFR 173.304a,      To authorize the
                                           Fuchu, Tokyo 183-      173.301, 172.101      transportation in
                                           8501.                  Table Column (9B).    commerce of anhydrous
                                                                                ammonia in non-DOT
                                                                                specification packaging
                                                                                (heat pipes). (modes 1,
                                                                                4)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2010-4034 Filed 3-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4909-60-M


P-19-0120 Sanitized Support Documents Index:
 P-19-0120 Sanitized Determination Document (linked)
 P-19-0120 Sanitized CHEM Report (attached)
 P-19-0120 Sanitized ECO Report (attached)
 P-19-0120 Sanitized ENG Report (attached)
 P-19-0120 Sanitized EXP Report (attached)
 P-19-0120 Sanitized Fate Report (attached)
 P-19-0120 Sanitized HLTH Report_POST-FOCUS FINAL (attached)


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66489-66491]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21032]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2023-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2371]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain

management measures that the community is required either to adopt or
to show evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain
qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before December 26, 2023.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2371, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email) [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be
identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date
listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Nicholas A. Shufro,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Risk Management,Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Chesterfield County, South Carolina and Incorporated Areas
        Project: 20-04-0032S Preliminary Date: September 30, 2022
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Town of Cheraw.........................  Town Hall, 200 Market Street,
                                          Cheraw, SC 29520.
Town of Chesterfield...................  Town Hall, 112 Main Street,
                                          Chesterfield, SC 29709.
Unincorporated Areas of Chesterfield     Chesterfield County
 County.                                  Administration Office, 178
                                          Mill Street, Chesterfield, SC
                                          29709.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Darlington County, South Carolina and Incorporated Areas
        Project: 20-04-0032S Preliminary Date: September 30, 2022
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Darlington.....................  City Hall, 400 Pearl Street,
                                          Darlington, SC 29532.
Unincorporated Areas of Darlington       Darlington County Courthouse, 1
 County.                                  Public Square, Room 303,
                                          Darlington, SC 29532.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Florence County, South Carolina and Incorporated Areas
        Project: 20-04-0032S Preliminary Date: September 30, 2022
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Florence.......................  City Center, 324 West Evans
                                          Street, Florence, SC 29501.
Unincorporated Areas of Florence County  Florence County Planning and
                                          Building, 518 South Irby
                                          Street, Florence, SC 29501.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Carter County, Tennessee and Incorporated Areas
        Project: 20-04-0040S Preliminary Date: September 8, 2022
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Elizabethton...................  City Hall, 136 South Sycamore
                                          Street, Elizabethton, TN
                                          37643.
Unincorporated Areas of Carter County..  Carter County Planning and
                                          Zoning Office, 300 North Main
                                          Street, Elizabethton, TN
                                          37643.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2023-21032 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register: June 30, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 126)]
[Notices]
[Page 36855]
[DOCID:fr30jn08-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1115-000]

Northern Virginia Electric Corporative; Supplemental Notice That
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section
204 Authorization

June 20, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Northern Virginia Electric Corporative's application for market-based
rate authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing interventions
or protests with regard to the applicant's request for blanket
authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities
and assumptions of liability, is July 10, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-14688 Filed 6-27-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


1 C:\ dmautop\ temp\ dwcgi 2836 1077711690 132453000. wpd MEMORANDUM TO: Jim Eddinger, EPA/ ESD FROM: Roy Oommen, ERG/ MOR DATE: November 17, 2003 SUBJECT: Summary of October 17, 2003 Boiler Meeting with the Sugarcane Industry A meeting between the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) and the sugarcane industry was held on October17, 2003 in Research Triangle Park, NC. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the sugarcane industry's comments on the proposed Industrial,

Institutional, and Commercial Boiler and Process Heater National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants ( NESHAP).

Meeting attendees included representatives of the OAQPS Emission Standards Division of the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) and AFMA. A complete list of attendees ( with their affiliation) is included as attachment 1.

Members of the sugarcane industry discussed comments submitted on the Boiler NESHAP. The meeting agenda is included in attachment 2. 2 C:\ dmautop\ temp\ dwcgi 2836 1077711690 132453000. wpd Attachment 1 Meeting Attendance List Meeting Attendance List Jose Alvarez Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative Dave Buff Golder Associates David Cooper University of Central Florida David Dee Landers and Parsons Jim Eddinger U. S. Environmental Protection Agency OAQPS Dave Guinnup U. S. Environmental Protection Agency OAQPS Kathy Lockhart Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative Roy Oommen ERG Draft Agenda for EPA Boiler MACT B Florida Sugar Industry Group Meeting October 17, 2003: 9 AM to 11 AM Location: U. S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, N. C.

Purpose of Meeting and Introductions ( 10 minutes)

Rule Status ( by EPA) ( 10 minutes):

Current state of rule development Deadline for submission to OMB Deadline to publish final rule Discussion of Major Issues for Florida Sugar Industry ( 75 minutes)

Exemptions for bagasse fuel CO limits for solid fuel category Hg limits for solid fuel category Fuel switching provisions Use of F Factor for determining heat input Opacity operating limit Bubble provisions Activated carbon injection for Hg control Rental/ Temporary boilers Risk based option for Manganese Monitoring, Recordkeeping, Reporting Risk Based options/ Hazard Index Operating parameter limits Applicability to non major boiler Summary and Schedule for Additional Information ( 10 minutes):

Next steps Summary of additional information needed by EPA Schedule for supplying information


                       Technical Support Document (TSD)
             for the Revised CSAPR Update for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS
                      Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2020-0272

Status of CAA Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) SIPs for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS for States Covered by the Proposed Revised CSAPR Update
                               Proposed Rule TSD

                      U.S Environmental Protection Agency
                          Office of Air and Radiation
                                     2020

Summary
This document describes the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (good neighbor provision) state implementation plan (SIP) status with respect to the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for each state covered by the proposed Revised CSAPR Update: Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. The descriptions include any findings of failure to submit good neighbor SIPs made by EPA and any actions taken by EPA on good neighbor SIP submissions. The descriptions also include the actions taken by EPA to implement Federal implementation plans (FIPs) in the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) Update (81 FR 74504 (Oct. 26, 2016)) and the determinations made by EPA in the CSAPR Close-Out (83 FR 65878 (Dec. 21, 2018)). In addition, each description indicates the legal effect of the holdings of Wisconsin v. EPA, 938 F.3d 303 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (Wisconsin) and New York v. EPA, 781 F. App'x 4 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (New York) with respect to the state. The facts presented in this document support EPA's conclusion that it currently has a legal obligation pursuant to CAA section 110(c) to take an action that fully addresses CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS for each of these states.

       Status of 2008 Ozone NAAQS Transport SIPs for States Covered by
                       the Proposed Revised CSAPR Update

Alabama
On July 13, 2015, EPA published a finding of failure to submit a complete good neighbor SIP to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS for Alabama (80 FR 39961, effective August 12, 2015). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a good neighbor FIP for Alabama in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On October 6, 2017, EPA published its approval of a SIP revision to replace the CSAPR Update FIP for Alabama and found that the SIP partially satisfies Alabama's good neighbor obligation for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (82 FR 46674). The SIP revision incorporated the CSAPR Update trading program for ozone season NOX into the Alabama SIP. On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that EPA continued to have an obligation to fully address the good neighbor provision requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS with respect to Alabama due to the July 13, 2015 finding (83 FR at 65883). EPA also determined in the CSAPR Close-Out that the good neighbor SIP approved on October 6, 2017 for Alabama fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the SIP approved on October 6, 2017, cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the July 13, 2015 finding of failure to submit.

Arkansas
On July 13, 2015, EPA published a finding of failure to submit a complete good neighbor SIP to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS for Arkansas (80 FR 39961, effective August 12, 2015). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for Arkansas in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for Arkansas fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the July 13, 2015 finding of failure to submit.

Illinois
On December 31, 2012, Illinois submitted a SIP revision to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS, the 2010 NO2 NAAQS and the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. On June 11, 2014, Illinois clarified that its SIP revision was not intended to address good neighbor SIP requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. On July 13, 2015, EPA published a finding of failure to submit a complete good neighbor SIP to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS for Illinois (80 FR 39961, effective August 12, 2015). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a good neighbor FIP for Illinois in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the CSAPR Update FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for Illinois fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP for Illinois cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the July 13, 2015 finding of failure to submit.

Indiana
On December 12, 2012, Indiana submitted a SIP revision to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. On June 15, 2016, EPA published its disapproval of Indiana's good neighbor SIP (81 FR 38957, effective July 15, 2016). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a good neighbor FIP for Indiana in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the CSAPR Update good neighbor FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On March 29, 2018, Indiana submitted a subsequent SIP revision intended to address the remaining deficiency after implementation of the CSAPR Update good neighbor FIP; the state withdrew that SIP revision on July 9, 2019. On December 17, 2018, EPA published its approval of a SIP revision to replace the CSAPR Update FIP for Indiana and found that the SIP partially satisfies Indiana's good neighbor obligation for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 64472). The SIP revision incorporated the CSAPR Update trading program for ozone season NOX into the Indiana SIP. On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that EPA continued to have an obligation to fully address the good neighbor provision requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS with respect to Indiana due to the June 15, 2016 disapproval of the state's good neighbor SIP (83 FR at 65883). EPA also determined in the CSAPR Close-Out that the good neighbor SIP approved on December 17, 2018 for Indiana fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the SIP approved on December 21, 2018, cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the June 15, 2016 disapproval.

Iowa
On July 13, 2015, EPA published a finding of failure to submit a complete good neighbor SIP to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS for Iowa (80 FR 39961, effective August 12, 2015). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for Iowa in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for Iowa fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP for Iowa cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the July 13, 2015 finding of failure to submit.

Kansas
On July 13, 2015, EPA published a finding of failure to submit a complete good neighbor SIP to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS for Kansas (80 FR 39961, effective August 12, 2015). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for Kansas in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for Kansas fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP for Kansas cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the July 13, 2015 finding of failure to submit.

Kentucky
On July 17, 2012, Kentucky submitted a SIP revision to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. On March 7, 2013, EPA published its disapproval of the state's good neighbor SIP (78 FR 14681, effective April 8, 2013). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for Kentucky in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On May 10, 2018 Kentucky submitted a SIP revision intended to address the remaining good neighbor obligations after implementation of the FIP. On July 17, 2018, EPA published an approval of Kentucky's SIP revision stating it fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 33730). The SIP approval relied on the emissions reductions from the CSAPR Update FIP for Kentucky and the same rationale and technical analysis eventually used in the CSAPR Close-Out for the determination that the remaining CSAPR Update FIP states fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. On September 13, 2018, Kentucky submitted a subsequent SIP revision intended to replace the CSAPR Update FIP for Kentucky; and on July 30, 2019, EPA proposed approval of the SIP revision (84 FR 36852), but has not yet taken final action on it. As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the Kentucky SIP approved on July 17, 2018 cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the March 7, 2013 disapproval. As explained in the preamble, EPA proposes an error correction under CAA section 110(k)(6) with respect to its approval of the Kentucky SIP revision published on July 17, 2018.

Louisiana
On June 7, 2013, Louisiana submitted a SIP revision to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. On August 12, 2016, EPA published its disapproval of the state's good neighbor SIP (81 FR 53308, effective September 12, 2016). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for Louisiana in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the CSAPR Update FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for Louisiana fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the FIP cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the August 12, 2016 SIP disapproval.

Maryland
On December 31, 2012, Maryland submitted a SIP revision to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. On April 20, 2016, Maryland withdrew its good neighbor SIP submission. On July 20, 2016, EPA published a finding of failure to submit a complete good neighbor SIP to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS for Maryland (81 FR 47040, effective August 19, 2016). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for Maryland in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the CSAPR Update FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On August 8, 2018, Maryland submitted a subsequent SIP revision intended to address the good neighbor requirements with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS, but EPA has not yet taken action on it. On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for Maryland fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019).  As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the July 20, 2016 finding of failure to submit.

Michigan
On July 13, 2015, EPA published a finding of failure to submit a complete good neighbor SIP to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS for Michigan (80 FR 39961, effective August 12, 2015). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for Michigan in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the CSAPR Update FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for Michigan fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the July 13, 2015 finding of failure to submit.

Mississippi
On July 13, 2015, EPA published a finding of failure to submit a complete good neighbor SIP to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS for Mississippi (80 FR 39961, effective August 12, 2015). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for Mississippi in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for Mississippi fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the July 13, 2015 finding of failure to submit.

Missouri
On July 13, 2015, EPA published a finding of failure to submit a complete good neighbor SIP to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS for Missouri (80 FR 39961, effective August 12, 2015). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a good neighbor FIP for Missouri in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for Missouri fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP could not be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the July 13, 2015 finding of failure to submit. On December 4, 2019, EPA published its approval of a SIP revision to replace the CSAPR Update FIP for Missouri and found that the SIP revision partially satisfies Missouri's good neighbor obligation for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (84 FR 66316). The SIP revision incorporated the CSAPR Update trading program for ozone season NOX into the Missouri SIP.

New Jersey
On October 17, 2014, New Jersey submitted a SIP revision to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. On March 30, 2016, New Jersey withdrew its good neighbor SIP submission. On June 15, 2016, EPA published a finding of failure to submit a complete good neighbor SIP to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS for New Jersey (81 FR 38963, effective July 15, 2016). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for New Jersey in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for New Jersey fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). On May 13, 2019, New Jersey submitted a subsequent SIP revision intended to address the good neighbor requirements with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS, but EPA has not yet taken action on it. As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the July 15, 2016 finding of failure to submit.

New York
On April 4, 2013, New York submitted a SIP revision to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. On August 26, 2016, EPA published its disapproval of New York's good neighbor SIP (81 FR 58849, effective September 26, 2016). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for New York in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On September 25, 2018, New York submitted a subsequent SIP revision intended to address the remaining deficiency after implementation of the FIP, but EPA has not yet taken action on it. On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for New York fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the August 26, 2016 disapproval.

Ohio
On December 27, 2012, Ohio submitted a SIP revision to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. On June 15, 2016, EPA published its disapproval of Ohio's good neighbor SIP (81 FR 38957, effective July 15, 2016). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for Ohio in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On April 17, 2018, Ohio submitted a subsequent SIP revision intended to address the remaining deficiency after implementation of the FIP; Ohio withdrew that SIP revision on January 8, 2019. On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for Ohio fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the June 15, 2016 disapproval.

Oklahoma
On July 13, 2015, EPA published a finding of failure to submit a complete good neighbor SIP to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS for Oklahoma (80 FR 39961, effective August 12, 2015). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for Oklahoma in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for Oklahoma fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the July 13, 2015 finding of failure to submit.

Pennsylvania
On July 13, 2015, EPA published a finding of failure to submit a complete good neighbor SIP to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS for Pennsylvania (80 FR 39961, effective August 12, 2015). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for Pennsylvania in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for Pennsylvania fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the July 13, 2015 finding of failure to submit.

Texas
On December 13, 2012, Texas submitted a SIP revision to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. On August 12, 2016, EPA published its disapproval of Texas's good neighbor SIP (81 FR 53284, effective Sept. 12, 2016). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for Texas in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for Texas fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the August 12, 2016 disapproval of the Texas good neighbor SIP.

Virginia
On July 13, 2015, EPA published a finding of failure to submit a complete good neighbor SIP to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS for Virginia (80 FR 39961, effective August 12, 2015). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for Virginia in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On August 27, 2018, Virginia submitted a SIP revision intended to address the good neighbor requirements with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS, but EPA has not yet taken action on it. On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for Virginia fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the July 13, 2015 finding of failure to submit.

West Virginia
On July 13, 2015, EPA published a finding of failure to submit a complete good neighbor SIP to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS for West Virginia (80 FR 39961, effective August 12, 2015). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for West Virginia in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(i)(I). On March 27, 2018, West Virginia submitted a SIP revision intended to address the remaining deficiency after implementation of the FIP. On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for West Virginia fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). On June 5, 2019, West Virginia submitted a SIP revision intended to replace the CSAPR Update FIP for West Virginia. On August 16, 2019, EPA proposed approval of the March 27, 2018 and June 5, 2019 SIP revisions (84 FR 41944), but EPA has not yet taken final action on either one. As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the July 13, 2015 finding of failure to submit.

Wisconsin
On June 20, 2013, Wisconsin submitted a SIP revision to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. On August 12, 2016, EPA published its partial disapproval of Wisconsin's good neighbor SIP as it pertains to interference with maintenance (81 FR 53309, effective Sept. 12, 2016). On October 26, 2016, EPA published a FIP for Wisconsin in the CSAPR Update addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. However, EPA did not determine that the FIP fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On December 21, 2018, EPA published a determination in the CSAPR Close-Out that the CSAPR Update FIP for Wisconsin fully addressed the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (83 FR 65878, effective February 19, 2019). As noted in the preamble to the proposed Revised CSAPR Update, following the D.C. Circuit decisions in Wisconsin and New York to remand the CSAPR Update and vacate the CSAPR Close-Out, the CSAPR Update FIP cannot be said to correct the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) deficiency identified in the August 12, 2016 partial disapproval.


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 52 (Friday, March 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14910-14913]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05655]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-10020-12-OMS]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Science Advisory Board (SAB), Office of The Administrator (OA),
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of a modified system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA), Science
Advisory Board Staff Office (SABSO) is

giving notice that it proposes to modify the Science Advisory Board
(SAB) Database of Scientific and Technical Experts system of records,
pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974. The system
assists EPA with providing management and technical support to three
scientific and technical advisory committees that report to the EPA
Administrator--the SAB, the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee
(CASAC), and the Advisory Council on Clean Air Compliance Analysis
(Council). The system is being modified to change: (1) The system
platform from Lotus Notes to Oracle APEX; (2) the system name from EPA
Science Advisory Board (SAB) Database of Scientific and Technical
Experts to Science Advisory Board Application (SABAPP); (3) to reduce
the categories of records in the system; and (4) to stop collecting new
records for the Council.

DATES: Persons wishing to comment on this system of records notice must
do so by April 19, 2021. New routine uses for this new system of
records will be effective April 19, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OMS-2020-0472, by one of the following methods:
    Regulations.gov: www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
    Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Mail: OMS Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code:
2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
    Hand Delivery: OMS Docket, EPA/DC, WJC West Building, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OMS-
2020-0472. The EPA policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) or other information for
which disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CUI or otherwise protected through
www.regulations.gov. The www.regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous
access'' system for EPA, which means the EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. Each agency determines submission requirements within
their own internal processes and standards. EPA has no requirement of
personal information. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA
without going through www.regulations.gov your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in the body of your comment. If the
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For
additional information about the EPA public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CUI or other information
for which disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material,
such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the OMS
Docket, EPA/DC, WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW, Washington. DC 20460. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the OMS Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Temporary Hours During COVID-19

    Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our
staff, the EPA Docket Center and Reading Room are closed to the public,
with limited exceptions, to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID-19.
Our Docket Center staff will continue to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. We encourage the public to
submit comments via https://www.regulations.gov/ or email, as there may
be a delay in processing mailand faxes. Hand deliveries and couriers
may be received by scheduled appointment only. For further information
on EPA Docket Center services and the current status, please visit us
online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aaron Yeow<EMAIL_ADDRESS>202-
564-2050, Physical Scientist, SAB Staff Office, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Mail Code 1400R, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20460.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SAB Database of Scientific and Technical
Experts system of records, EPA-58, is being migrated from the Lotus
Notes platform to an Oracle platform as a result of the agency moving
off of the Lotus Notes platform. In the process, EPA is changing the
system name to Science Advisory Board Application (SABAPP) to have a
more concise name. EPA is also reducing the categories of records
stored in the system, as it will no longer store home contact
information, e.g., address and telephone number. The SABSO no longer
uses this information. The system will no longer collect new records
for the Council because the committee has been retired. The existing
Council records will be maintained for historical and record-keeping
purposes.

SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER:
    Science Advisory Board Application (SABAPP) EPA-58.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:
    Unclassified.

SYSTEM LOCATION:
    National Computer Center (NCC), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research
Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27711.

SYSTEM MANAGER(S):
    Aaron Yeow, Physical Scientist, SAB Staff Office, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 1400R, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460.

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
    The authority for the establishment or appointment of these
advisory committees is as follows: For the SAB, the Environmental
Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization Act (42 U.S.C.
4365); CASAC--section 109(d)(2) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.
7409(d)(2)); the Council, section 312(f) of the Clean Air Act (42
U.S.C. 7612(f)); the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et. seq.); FACA--41 CFR part 102-3; 5 U.S.C. 1104; 5 U.S.C. 1302.

PURPOSE(S) OF THE SYSTEM:
    This system of records assists EPA with providing management and
technical support to two active (SAB

and CASAC) scientific and technical advisory committees (SAB and CASAC)
that report to the EPA Administrator and to maintain historical records
of a retired committee (Council). The SAB Staff Office requests
nominations of experts from the public wishing to nominate themselves
or others for committees and panels providing advice to the
Administrator. The Staff Office will identify experts to become Special
Government Employees serving on advisory committees and panels. The SAB
Staff Office conducts these activities to provide the EPA Administrator
with scientific advice from balanced committees of qualified experts on
high priority science issues. The SABAPP will track the status of their
personnel paperwork; track the status of their ethics training and
financial disclosure requirements of the Ethics in Government Act; and
facilitate coordination of experts' participation in approximately
fifty advisory projects per year and approximately eighty meetings per
year. The SABAPP assists the SAB Staff Office to achieve these goals in
an efficient manner that protects the privacy of scientific experts.
The SABAPP serves as the repository and tracking system for the matters
listed.

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY SYSTEM:
    Scientific and technical experts currently serving on committees
and panels administered by the SAB Staff Office; scientific and
technical experts who have served on such committees and panels since
2002; and scientific and technical experts nominated to serve on
planned SAB Staff Office-supported committees and panels.

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
    Name; professional contact information, e.g., professional title,
institutional affiliation, and work contact information; dates of
appointment to advisory committees and panels; expertise information,
e.g., curricula vitae and professional biographical sketches; and
administrative history information, e.g., history of personnel actions,
history of submitting confidential financial disclosure forms, and
history of completing annual ethics training.

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
    The public provides names and contact information for scientific
and/or technical experts to be considered for membership on the SAB and
CASAC committees and panel. The individual experts themselves provide
further contact information as well as their professional biosketches
and curricula vitae.

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES
OF USERS AND PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
    The following routine uses are both related to and compatible with
the original purpose for which the information was collected. The
information may be disclosed to and for the following EPA General
Routine Uses published at 73 FR 2245: General routine uses A, B, C, E,
F, G, H, I, J, and K apply to this system (73 FR 2245). In addition,
the two routine uses below (L and M) are required under OMB M-17-12.
    A. Disclosure for Law Enforcement Purposes: Information may be
disclosed to the appropriate Federal, State, local, tribal, or foreign
agency responsible for investigating, prosecuting, enforcing, or
implementing a statute, rule, regulation, or order, if the information
is relevant to a violation or potential violation of civil or criminal
law or regulation within the jurisdiction of the receiving entity.
    B. Disclosure Incident to Requesting Information: Information may
be disclosed to any source from which additional information is
requested (to the extent necessary to identify the individual, inform
the source of the purpose of the request, and to identify the type of
information requested,) when necessary to obtain information relevant
to an agency decision concerning retention of an employee or other
personnel action (other than hiring,) retention of a security
clearance, the letting of a contract, or the issuance or retention of a
grant, or other benefit.
    C. Disclosure to Requesting Agency: Disclosure may be made to a
Federal, State, local, foreign, or tribal or other public authority of
the fact that this system of records contains information relevant to
the retention of an employee, the retention of a security clearance,
the letting of a contract, or the issuance or retention of a license,
grant, or other benefit. The other agency or licensing organization may
then make a request supported by the written consent of the individual
for the entire record if it so chooses. No disclosure will be made
unless the information has been determined to be sufficiently reliable
to support a referral to another office within the agency or to another
Federal agency for criminal, civil, administrative, personnel, or
regulatory action.
    D. Disclosure to Office of Management and Budget: Information may
be disclosed to the Office of Management and Budget at any stage in the
legislative coordination and clearance process in connection with
private relief legislation as set forth in OMB Circular No. A-19.
    E. Disclosure to Congressional Offices: Information may be
disclosed to a congressional office from the record of an individual in
response to an inquiry from the congressional office made at the
request of the individual.
    F. Disclosure to Department of Justice: Information may be
disclosed to the Department of Justice, or in a proceeding before a
court, adjudicative body, or other administrative body before which the
Agency is authorized to appear, when:
    1. The Agency, or any component thereof;
    2. Any employee of the Agency in his or her official capacity;
    3. Any employee of the Agency in his or her individual capacity
where the Department of Justice or the Agency have agreed to represent
the employee; or
    4. The United States, if the Agency determines that litigation is
likely to affect the Agency or any of its components, is a party to
litigation or has an interest in such litigation, and the use of such
records by the Department of Justice or the Agency is deemed by the
Agency to be relevant and necessary to the litigation provided,
however, that in each case it has been determined that the disclosure
is compatible with the purpose for which the records were collected.
    G. Disclosure to the National Archives: Information may be
disclosed to the National Archives and Records Administration in
records management inspections.
    H. Disclosure to Contractors, Grantees, and Others: Information may
be disclosed to contractors, grantees, consultants, or volunteers
performing or working on a contract, service, grant, cooperative
agreement, job, or other activity for the Agency and who have a need to
have access to the information in the performance of their duties or
activities for the Agency. When appropriate, recipients will be
required to comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974 as
provided in 5 U.S.C. 552a(m).
    I. Disclosures for Administrative Claims, Complaints and Appeals:
Information from this system of records may be disclosed to an
authorized appeal grievance examiner, formal complaints examiner, equal
employment opportunity investigator, arbitrator or other person
properly engaged in investigation or settlement of an administrative
grievance, complaint, claim, or appeal filed by an employee,

but only to the extent that the information is relevant and necessary
to the proceeding. Agencies that may obtain information under this
routine use include, but are not limited to, the Office of Personnel
Management, Office of Special Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board,
Federal Labor Relations Authority, Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission, and Office of Government Ethics.
    J. Disclosure to the Office of Personnel Management: Information
from this system of records may be disclosed to the Office of Personnel
Management pursuant to that agency's responsibility for evaluation and
oversight of Federal personnel management.
    K. Disclosure in Connection with Litigation: Information from this
system of records may be disclosed in connection with litigation or
settlement discussions regarding claims by or against the Agency,
including public filing with a court, to the extent that disclosure of
the information is relevant and necessary to the litigation or
discussions and except where court orders are otherwise required under
section (b)(11) of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(11).
    L. Disclosure to Persons or Entities in Response to an Actual of
Suspected Breach of Personally Identifiable Information: To appropriate
agencies, entities, and persons when (1) the Agency suspects or has
confirmed that there has been a breach of the system of records, (2)
the Agency has determined that as a result of the suspected or
confirmed breach there is a risk of harm to individuals, the Agency
(including its information systems, programs, and operations), the
Federal Government, or national security; and (3) the disclosure made
to such agencies, entities, and persons is reasonably necessary to
assist in connection with the Agency's efforts to respond to the
suspected or confirmed breach or to prevent, minimize, or remedy such
harm.
    M. Disclosure to assist another agency in its efforts to respond to
a breach: To another Federal agency or Federal entity, when the Agency
determines that information from this system of records is reasonably
necessary to assist the recipient agency or entity in (1) responding to
a suspected or confirmed breach or (2) preventing, minimizing, or
remedying the risk of harm to individuals, the recipient agency or
entity (including its information systems, programs, and operations),
the Federal Government, or national security, resulting from a
suspected or confirmed breach.

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR STORAGE OF RECORDS:
    These records are maintained electronically on servers located at
EPA, National Computer Center (NCC), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research
Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27711. Backups will be maintained at a
disaster recovery site.

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETRIEVAL OF RECORDS:
    Personal information is retrieved by expert's name or by committee
or panel name.

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETENTION AND DISPOSAL OF RECORDS:
    Records are retained and disposed of in accordance with NARA
records retention schedules appropriate to the retention of Federal
Advisory Committee information, as well as EPA's Records Schedule 1024.
The disposal of these records fall under the substantive committee
records and are permanent.

ADMINISTRATIVE, TECHNICAL, AND PHYSICAL SAFEGUARDS:
    Security controls used to protect personally identifiable
information in SABAPP are commensurate with those required for an
information system rated moderate for confidentiality, integrity, and
availability, as prescribed in NIST Special Publication, 800-53,
``Recommended Security Controls for Federal Information Systems,''
Revision 4.
    1. Administrative Safeguards--only authorized users needing access
to the system will be granted role-based credentials to access the
system. Users of EPA systems are required to complete security and
privacy training on an annual basis to ensure continued access to the
system.
    2. Technical Safeguards--SABAPP is a password protected system
requiring all users to log in to access the information in the system.
It is only accessible on the EPA network using government furnished
equipment. It utilizes the agency's network user-authentication
process. The system times out after a period of latency ensuring a user
re-authenticates their session with a username and password. The
records are stored on an encrypted database.
    3. Physical Safeguards--All records are maintained in secure areas
and buildings with physical access controls.

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
    Individuals seeking access to information in this system of records
about themselves are required to provide adequate identification, e.g.,
driver's license, military identification card, employee badge or
identification card. Additional identity verification procedures may be
required, as warranted. Requests must meet the requirements of EPA
regulations that implement the Privacy Act of 1974, at 40 CFR part 16.

CONTESTING RECORDS PROCEDURES:
    Requests for correction or amendment must identify the record to be
changed and the corrective action sought. Complete EPA Privacy Act
procedures are described in EPA's Privacy Act regulations at 40 CFR
part 16.

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
    Any individual who wants to know whether this system of records
contains a record about themself, should make a written request to the
Attn: Agency Privacy Officer, MC 2831T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460, or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM:
    None.

HISTORY:
    The original system of records notice for EPA-58 was published in
the Federal Register on July 13, 2009, (74 FR 33435-33437).

Vaughn Noga,
Senior Agency Official for Privacy.
[FR Doc. 2021-05655 Filed 3-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P