[Federal Register: July 31, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 148)]
[Notices]
[Page 44786-44787]
[DOCID:fr31jy08-85]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. IC-28343]

Notice of Applications for Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940

July 25, 2008.
    The following is a notice of applications for deregistration under
section 8(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for the month of
July, 2008. A copy of each application may be obtained for a fee at the
SEC's Public Reference Branch (tel.<PHONE_NUMBER>). An order granting
each application will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing on any application by writing
to the SEC's Secretary at the address below and serving the relevant
applicant with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing
requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on August 19, 2008,
and should be accompanied by proof of service on the applicant, in the
form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing
requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, the reason
for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the
Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane L. Titus at<PHONE_NUMBER>, SEC,
Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company
Regulation, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-4041.

Legg Mason Partners Investment Funds, Inc. [File No. 811-3275]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On April 16, 2007, each series of applicant
transferred its assets to a corresponding series of either Legg Mason
Partners Equity Trust or Legg Mason Partners Income Trust, based on net
asset value. Expenses of approximately $1,016,235 incurred in
connection with the reorganization were paid by applicant and Legg
Mason, Inc., the parent of applicant's investment adviser.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on July 16, 2008.
    Applicant's Address: 55 Water St., New York, NY 10041.

Delaware Investments Municipal Trust [File No. 811-6411]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an

investment company. On July 13, 2007, applicant transferred its assets
to Delaware Tax-Free USA Fund, a series of Delaware Group Tax Free
Fund, based on net asset value. Expenses of approximately $77,088
incurred in connection with the reorganization were paid by applicant,
the acquiring fund, and applicant's investment adviser, Delaware
Management Company.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on July 16, 2008.
    Applicant's Address: 2005 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19103-7094.

C Funds Group, Inc. [File No. 811-4246]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On April 28, 2008, applicant made a
liquidating distribution to its shareholders, based on net asset value.
Applicant incurred no expenses in connection with the liquidation.
Applicant's custodian holds $55.39 in cash for the one remaining
shareholder that applicant has been unable to locate. The custodian
will hold the unclaimed assets for the period specified by Florida law,
after which time any unclaimed assets will escheat to the state of
Florida.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on July 17, 2008.
    Applicant's Address: 201 Center Rd., Suite Two, Venice, FL 34285.

SEI Insurance Products Trust [File No. 811-9183]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On August 29, 2003, applicant made a
liquidating distribution to its shareholders based on net asset value.
Applicant incurred no expenses in connection with the liquidation. On
April 11, 2008, in connection with the request for deregistration,
Applicant filed its final Form 24F-2 Annual Notice of Securities Sold.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on March 18, 2004, and an
amended application was filed on April 11, 2007.
    Applicant's Address: SEI Investments Global Fund Services, 1
Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456.

Genworth Life of New York VL Separate Account 1 [File No. 811-9861]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. Applicant
requests deregistration based on abandonment of registration. At the
time of filing, sales of policies had been discontinued and there were
less than 25 policy owners. Applicant will continue to operate as an
unregistered separate account in reliance on section 3(c)(1) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on March 28, 2008, and
amended on July 18, 2008 and July 23, 2008.
    Applicant's Address: 6610 West Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia,
23230.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-17504 Filed 7-30-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 162 (Thursday, August 20, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51327-51329]
[FR Doc No: 2020-18046]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0186; Airspace Docket No. 19-ANE-5]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment and Establishment of Area Navigation (RNAV) Routes;
Northeastern United States

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends low altitude RNAV route T-300, and
establish low altitude RNAV routes T-391, T-393, and T-395 in the
northeastern United States. The changes reduce the dependency of the
National Airspace System (NAS) on ground-based navigational systems,
and assist with the transition to a more efficient Performance Based
Navigation (PBN) route structure. This action also provides RNAV
routing in support the FAA's VOR Minimum Operating Network (VOR MON)
program.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, November 5, 2020. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
Title 1 Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC, 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. The Order is also available for inspection
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA Order 7400.11D at NARA, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Hook, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would expand the availability of RNAV in the
northeastern United States to improve the efficiency of the NAS by
lessening the dependency on ground-based navigation aids.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking for Docket No.
FAA-2020-0186 in the Federal Register (85 FR 16582; March 24, 2020)
amending low altitude RNAV route T-300, and establishing low altitude
RNAV routes T-391, T-393, and T-395 in the northeastern United States.
Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal. No comments were
received.
    United States Area Navigation routes are published in paragraph
6011 of FAA Order 7400.2D, dated August 8, 2019, and effective
September 15, 2019, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
The RNAV routes listed in the document will be subsequently published
in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and effective September 15,
2019. FAA Order 7400.11D is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11D lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    The FAA is amending Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by amending low altitude RNAV route T-300, and establishing low
altitude RNAV routes T-391, T-393, and T-395, in the northeastern
United States. This action expands the availability of RNAV and
improves the efficiency of the NAS by reducing the dependency on
ground-based navigation systems. The T-routes provide RNAV capability
in the northeast U.S. where certain VOR navigation aids are planned for
decommissioning as part of the FAA's VOR MON program. The following is
a general description of the routes.
    T-300: T-300 is an existing route that currently extends between
the Albany, NY (ALB) VORTAC, and the Martha's Vineyard, MA (MVY), VOR/
DME. The FAA is extending T-300 north of the Albany, NY (ALB), VORTAC
to the SSENA, NY, waypoint (WP). The SSENA, NY, WP is located in the
vicinity of the Massena, NY (MSS), VORTAC which is planned for
decommissioning at a later date. The following points are inserted
between the Albany VORTAC and the SSENA WP: OTOLE, NY, Fix; GASSY, NY,
Fix; OPDIE, NY, WP; UUBER, NY, WP; JONNN, NY, Fix; and the STANK, NY,
WP. T-300 overlies VOR Federal airway V-203 between the Albany VORTAC,
and the GASSY, NY, Fix. From that point, T-300 offsets to the east of
V-203, passing through the OPDIE, NY, WP; UUBER, NY, WP; JONNN, NY,
Fix; and STANK, NY, WP, to the SSENA, NY, WP.
    The FAA is removing the Norwich, CT (ORW), VOR/DME; the FALMA, RI,
Fix; and the Martha's Vineyard, MA, VOR/DME from the T-300 route
description. The Norwich VOR/DME is replaced by the YANCT, CT, Fix
which is inserted in the route description between the NELLIE, CT, Fix,
and the MINNK, RI, Fix. The YANCT WP is located in the vicinity of the
Norwich VOR/DME which is planned for decommissioning at a later date.
Finally, the current T-300 route segment that extends between the
MINNK, RI, Fix, and the Martha's Vineyard VOR/DME is removed from the
route and that end of the route is realigned to proceed from the MINNK
Fix southeastward to the NEWBE, RI, Fix, and the DEEPO, MA, fix.
    T-391: T-391 is a new route that overlies VOR Federal airway V-29
between the TUMPS, NY, Fix, and the Massena, NY (MSS), VORTAC. T-391
extends between the TUMPS Fix and the SSENA, NY, WP. The SSENA WP is
located in the vicinity of the Massena VORTAC, as described under T-
300, above. T-391 includes following points between the TUMPS Fix and
the SSENA WP: Syracuse, NY (SYR), VORTAC;

PAGER, NY, Fix; BRUIN, NY, Fix; Watertown, NY (ART) VORTAC; WILRD, NY,
Fix; and the LETUS, NY, Fix.
    T-393: T-393 is a new route that overlies VOR Federal airway V-151
between the GAILS, MA, Fix, and the Burlington, VT (BTV), VOR/DME. The
following points are included between the GAILS Fix and the Burlington
VOR/DME: INNDY, MA, Fix; Providence, RI (PVD) VOR/DME; FOSTY, RI, Fix;
PUTNM, CT, WP; GRIPE, MA, Fix; Gardner, MA (GDM), VOR/DME; KEYNN, NH,
WP; STRUM, NH, Fix; UNKER, NH, Fix; MCADM, NH, Fix; LBNON, NH, WP;
ZIECH, VT, Fix; DAVID, VT, Fix; Montpelier, VT (MPV), VOR/DME; CEVIB,
VT, Fix; and the POROE, VT, Fix.
    The PUTNM, CT WP is located in the vicinity of the Putnam, CT
(PUT), VOR/DME which is planned for decommissioning at a later date.
The KEYNN, NH, WP is located in the vicinity of the Keene, NH (EEN),
VORTAC which is planned for decommissioning at a later date. The LBNON,
NH, WP is located in the vicinity of the Lebanon, NH (LEB), VOR/DME
which is planned for decommissioning at a later date.
    T-395: T-395 is a new route that overlies VOR Federal airway V-322
between the Concord, NH (CON), VOR/DME and the BRLIN, NH, WP. The BRLIN
WP is located in the vicinity of the Berlin, NH (BML), VOR/DME, which
is planned for decommissioning at a later date. The following points is
included between the Concord VOR/DME and the BRLIN WP: YECKA, NH, Fix;
GRUMP, NH, Fix; LAROE, NH, Fix; NOTTY, NH, Fix; WYLIE, ME, Fix; and the
JOBBY, NH, Fix.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated,
does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action of amending low altitude
RNAV route T-300, and establishing low altitude RNAV routes T-391, T-
393, and T-395 in the northeastern United States qualifies for
categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act and
its implementing regulations at 40 CFR part 1500, and in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures,
paragraph 5-6.5a, which categorically excludes from further
environmental impact review rulemaking actions that designate or modify
classes of airspace areas, airways, routes, and reporting points (see
14 CFR part 71, Designation of Class A, B, C, D, and E Airspace Areas;
Air Traffic Service Routes; and Reporting Points). As such, this action
is not expected to cause any potentially significant environmental
impacts. In accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, paragraph 5-2 regarding
Extraordinary Circumstances, the FAA has reviewed this action for
factors and circumstances in which a normally categorically excluded
action may have a significant environmental impact requiring further
analysis. The FAA has determined no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact study.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and
effective September 15, 2019, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6011 United States Area Navigation Routes.

* * * * *

T-300 SSENA, NY to DEEPO, MA [Amended]

SSENA, NY                                         WP                            (Lat. 44[deg]54'51.43'' N, long. 074[deg]43'21.31'' W)
STANK, NY                                         WP                            (Lat. 44[deg]47'00.00'' N, long. 074[deg]07'00.00'' W)
JONNN, NY                                         FIX                           (Lat. 44[deg]34'13.71'' N, long. 074[deg]01'38.96'' W)
UUBER, NY                                         WP                            (Lat. 44[deg]28'00.25'' N, long. 074[deg]01'10.54'' W)
OPDIE, NY                                         WP                            (Lat. 44[deg]16'46.05'' N, long. 074[deg]00'14.41'' W)
GASSY, NY                                         FIX                           (Lat. 43[deg]24'53.26'' N, long. 073[deg]57'50.84'' W)
OTOLE, NY                                         FIX                           (Lat. 42[deg]56'58.56'' N, long. 073[deg]51'05.77'' W)
Albany, NY (ALB)                                  VORTAC                        (Lat. 42[deg]44'50.21'' N, long. 073[deg]48'11.47'' W)
NELIE, CT                                         FIX                           (Lat. 41[deg]56'27.64'' N, long. 072[deg]41'18.88'' W)
YANTC, CT                                         WP                            (Lat. 41[deg]33'22.81'' N, long. 071[deg]59'56.95'' W)
MINNK, RI                                         FIX                           (Lat. 41[deg]21'40.67'' N, long. 071[deg]25'27.20'' W)
NEWBE, RI                                         FIX                           (Lat. 41[deg]12'24.39'' N, long. 071[deg]04'26.92'' W)
DEEPO, MA                                         FIX                           (Lat. 41[deg]06'53.96'' N, long. 070[deg]50'09.85'' W)

                                                                      * * * * * * *
T-391 TUMPS, NY to SSENA, NY [New]

TUMPS, NY                                         FIX                           (Lat. 43[deg]01'18.27'' N, long. 076[deg]10'04.09'' W)
Syracuse, NY (SYR)                                VORTAC                        (Lat. 43[deg]09'37.87'' N, long. 076[deg]12'16.41'' W)
PAGER, NY                                         FIX                           (Lat. 43[deg]25'25.64'' N, long. 076[deg]09'30.34'' W)
BRUIN, NY                                         FIX                           (Lat. 43[deg]39'59.04'' N, long. 076[deg]06'55.97'' W)
Watertown, NY (ART)                               VORTAC                        (Lat. 43[deg]57'07.67'' N, long. 076[deg]03'52.66'' W)

WILRD, NY                                         FIX                           (Lat. 44[deg]15'43.61'' N, long. 075[deg]47'03.12'' W)
LETUS, NY                                         FIX                           (Lat. 44[deg]37'22.34'' N, long. 075[deg]27'11.44'' W)
SSENA, NY                                         WP                            (Lat. 44[deg]54'51.43'' N, long. 074[deg]43'21.31'' W)

                                                                      * * * * * * *
T-393 GAILS, MA to Burlington, VT (BTV) [New]

GAILS, MA                                         FIX                           (Lat. 41[deg]52'08.51'' N, long. 070[deg]24'07.69'' W)
INNDY, MA                                         FIX                           (Lat. 41[deg]46'19.19'' N, long. 071[deg]05'55.93'' W)
Providence, RI (PVD)                              VOR/DME                       (Lat. 41[deg]43'27.63'' N, long. 071[deg]25'46.71'' W)
FOSTY, RI                                         FIX                           (Lat. 41[deg]50'35.46'' N, long. 071[deg]38'31.34'' W)
PUTNM, CT                                         WP                            (Lat. 41[deg]57'19.65'' N, long. 071[deg]50'38.76'' W)
GRIPE, MA                                         FIX                           (Lat. 42[deg]08'08.87'' N, long. 071[deg]54'32.47'' W)
Gardner, MA (GDM)                                 VOR/DME                       (Lat. 42[deg]32'45.31'' N, long. 072[deg]03'29.48'' W)
KEYNN, NH                                         WP                            (Lat. 42[deg]47'39.99'' N, long. 072[deg]17'30.35'' W)
STRUM, NH                                         FIX                           (Lat. 42[deg]55'51.18'' N, long. 072[deg]16'48.88'' W)
UNKER, NH                                         FIX                           (Lat. 43[deg]20'55.19'' N, long. 072[deg]14'40.50'' W)
MCADM, NH                                         FIX                           (Lat. 43[deg]32'44.84'' N, long. 072[deg]13'39.34'' W)
LBNON, NH                                         WP                            (Lat. 43[deg]40'44.43'' N, long. 072[deg]12'58.18'' W)
ZIECH, VT                                         FIX                           (Lat. 43[deg]49'58.39'' N, long. 072[deg]18'14.50'' W)
DAVID, VT                                         FIX                           (Lat. 43[deg]54'35.43'' N, long. 072[deg]20'53.51'' W)
Montpelier, VT (MPV)                              VOR/DME                       (Lat. 44[deg]05'07.74'' N, long. 072[deg]26'57.76'' W)
CEVIB, VT                                         FIX                           (Lat. 44[deg]11'40.96'' N, long. 072[deg]42'15.29'' W)
POROE, VT                                         FIX                           (Lat. 44[deg]13'28.02'' N, long. 072[deg]46'26.54'' W)
Burlington, VT (BTV)                               VOR/DME                      (Lat. 44[deg]23'49.58'' N, long. 073[deg]10'57.48'' W)

                                                                      * * * * * * *
T-395 Concord, NH (CON) to BRLIN, NH [New]

Concord, NH (CON)                                 VOR/DME                       (Lat. 43[deg]13'11.23'' N, long. 071[deg]34'31.63'' W)
YECKA, NH                                         FIX                           (Lat. 43[deg]28'08.16'' N, long. 071[deg]26'13.93'' W)
GRUMP, NH                                         FIX                           (Lat. 43[deg]33'05.83'' N, long. 071[deg]23'27.86'' W)
LAROE, NH                                         FIX                           (Lat. 43[deg]44'58.72'' N, long. 071[deg]16'47.95'' W)
NOTTY, NH                                         FIX                           (Lat. 44[deg]01'57.29'' N, long. 071[deg]07'11.43'' W)
WYLIE, ME                                         FIX                           (Lat. 44[deg]14'36.30'' N, long. 070[deg]59'57.84'' W)
JOBBY, NH                                         FIX                           (Lat. 44[deg]24'34.54'' N, long. 071[deg]04'43.11'' W)
BRLIN, NH                                         WP                            (Lat. 44[deg]38'00.82'' N, long. 071[deg]11'10.32'' W)

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 13, 2020.
Scott M. Rosenbloom,
Acting Manager, Rules and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2020-18046 Filed 8-19-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34060-34061]
[FR Doc No: E9-16580]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60257; File No. SR-BX-2009-036]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Further
Extend the Temporary Cap on Certain Fees for Members

July 7, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 30, 2009, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. BX filed the proposal pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)\3\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)\4\ thereunder. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    BX proposes to extend the temporary cap on fees charged for OUCH
ports to the Equities Market due to unanticipated delays in developing
and implementing an anti-internalization function. The text of the
proposed rule change is below. Proposed new language is underlined;
deleted language is in brackets.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Changes are marked to the rule text that appears in the
electronic manual of Nasdaq found at http://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

7015. Access Services

    The following charges are assessed by the Exchange for ports to
establish connectivity to the NASDAQ OMX BX Equities Market, as well as
ports to receive data from the NASDAQ OMX BX Equities Market:
     $400 per month for each port pair, other than Multicast
ITCH[supreg] data feed pairs, for which the fee is $1000 per month.
Additional OUCH port pairs beyond 15 are at no cost for the months of
May[and], June and July 2009.
     Internet Ports: An additional $200 per month for each
Internet port that requires additional bandwidth.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, BX included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. BX has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    BX is proposing to extend the temporary modification to its pricing
for OUCH ports, which provide

connectivity to the NASDAQ OMX BX Equities Market. On May 1, 2009, BX
filed an immediately effective rule change to eliminate fees for a
member firm's OUCH ports in excess of 15 for the months of May and June
2009.\6\ In that filing, BX noted member firms had complained that,
because BX does not have an anti-internalization capability, they must
purchase additional OUCH ports that they would otherwise not need to
purchase solely to avoid unwanted execution against their customer
orders. Internalization occurs when a member firm's customer order is
posted on the market and executed all or in part by the same member
firm. Member firms must avoid internalization of certain customer
orders to avoid violating rules and regulations of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act that preclude and/or limit managing
broker-dealers of such customer accounts from trading as principal with
orders generated for those accounts. Currently, some member firms are
only able to avoid internalization by purchasing additional OUCH ports
through which they place all order flow that must not be internalized.
Such additional ports have a [sic] discrete MPID numbers, which allow
these member firms to identify the orders and avoid internalization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59894 (May 8, 2009),
74 FR 23000 (May 15, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    BX determined to limit the number of OUCH port pairs that a member
is charged monthly to 15 for the months of May and June 2009, so that
those firms affected by BX's lack of an anti-internalization function
were provided relief until BX could implement such a function. BX noted
in its rule change that it would either seek to remove the cap language
from the rule upon its expiration or alternatively would seek to extend
the cap until such time the anti-internalization function could be
implemented. BX had originally anticipated developing and implementing
the anti-internalization function by the end of June; however, BX has
encountered unanticipated delays that will prevent the function from
being implemented on schedule. As such, BX is proposing to further
extend the temporary modification of its OUCH port pair pricing through
July 2009, at which time BX anticipates the implementation of the anti-
internalization function will be complete and affected member firms can
reduce the number of ports currently subscribed to solely due to the
lack of such a function. BX will seek to remove the cap language from
the rule upon its expiration or alternatively will seek to extend the
cap until such time the anti-internalization function can be
implemented.
2. Statutory Basis
    BX believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\7\ in general, and with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system
which BX operates or controls. The proposed fee change applies
uniformly to all BX members. BX has determined that temporarily
instituting a cap on fees for OUCH ports in excess of 15 will provide
relief to member firms required to purchase additional ports solely due
to BX's lack of an anti-internalization function.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act\9\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\10\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BX-2009-036 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2009-036. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filings also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2009-036 and should be
submitted on or before August 4, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-16580 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1139-1140]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00187]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 405-133]

Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Notice of Application Accepted
for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Recreation Management Plan.
    b. Project No: 405-133.
    c. Date Filed: September 17, 2021.
    d. Applicant: Exelon Generation Company, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Conowingo Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The project is located on the Susquehanna River in
Lancaster and York counties Pennsylvania and Cecil and Hartford
counties, Maryland. The project does not occupy federal lands.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Andrea Danucalov, Exelon Generation, LLC,
2569 Shures Landing Road, Darlington, MD 21034; telephone (267) 533-
1125; or email [email protected].
    i. FERC Contact: Mark Ivy,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or [email protected].
    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and
protests: February 3, 2022.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, motions to intervene, and protests using the Commission's
eFiling system at https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.
Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without
prior registration, using the eComment system at https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact
information at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at [email protected],<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll
free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, you may
submit a paper copy. Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service must
be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.
Submissions sent via any other carrier must be addressed to: Kimberly
D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins
Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The first page of any filing should
include the docket number P-405-133. Comments emailed to Commission
staff are not considered part of the Commission record.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person whose name appears on the official service
list for the project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or
documents with the Commission relating to the merits of an issue that
may affect the responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they
must also serve a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Request: The licensee filed a Recreation
Management Plan, as required by Article 426, which includes a
description of the recreation facilities at each project recreation
site, recreation use data at each site for the time period March 15,
2008 through March 14, 2009, and a description of and implementation
schedule for proposed enhancements at each site. The plan also includes
a provision to monitor recreation use every ten years over the license
term as well as an interim recreation use assessment, to be completed
by August 31, 2024, to evaluate conditions at the Conowingo Creek, Line
Bridge, and Peach Bottom Marina recreation sites.
    l. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (https://ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the

last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. At
this time, the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's
Public Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National
Emergency concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued
by the President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact FERC at
[email protected] or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,
(202) 502-8659. Agencies may obtain copies of the application directly
from the applicant.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214, respectively. In determining the appropriate action to take, the
Commission will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only
those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with the
Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments,
protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or before the
specified comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Documents: Any filing must (1) bear in all
capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO
INTERVENE'' as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the name of the
applicant and the project number of the application to which the filing
responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the
person commenting, protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise comply
with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, motions to intervene, or protests must set forth their
evidentiary basis. Any filing made by an intervenor must be accompanied
by proof of service on all persons listed in the service list prepared
by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR
385.2010.

    Dated: January 4, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-00187 Filed 1-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


MEMORANDUM

DATE:		08/25/2021

TO:	National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks Residual Risk and Technology Review; Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0085

FROM:	Donna Lee Jones, U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS), Research Triangle Park, NC; Gabrielle Raymond, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC

SUBJECT:	Conference call with Coke Industry Representatives
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary

      A Microsoft TEAMS conference call was held on August 25, 2021, between the EPA, the Coke Oven Environmental Task Force (COETF) of the American Coke and Coal Chemicals Institute (ACCCI), and coke ovens company representatives as part of the residual risk and technology review (RTR) for Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (PQBS) NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart CCCCC).

      Industry representatives expressed their concern with AERMOD and stated that there was a modeling code error in the buoyant line plume (BLP) model. Industry representatives said that the error would result in overstated risk values. Industry representatives requested that EPA work to prioritize the error before modeling for the PQBS industry and were concerned about public comments on the results if the error was not fixed. The EPA thanked industry for the information. The industry said they would be checking the NESHAP site for the corrected AERMOD input file.

ATTENDEES

Matthew Woody, EPA/OAQPS
Mike Moeller, EPA/OAQPS
Donna Lee Jones, EPA/OAQPS
Chuck French, EPA/OAQPS
Gabrielle Raymond, RTI International

David Ailor, COETF/ACCCI
Mary Kaplan, COETF consultant, AECOM
Robert Paine, COETF consultant, AECOM
Allen Dittenhoefer, COETF consultant, Montrose, Inc.
Ted Palma, COETF consultant
Jeffrey Knight, COETF counsel, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP

Cleveland Cliffs (previously AK Steel and ArcelorMittal USA)
Rich Zavoda

ABC Coke
Jay Cornelius
Abby Dolby

DTE - EES
Robert Sanch

U.S. Steel
Christopher Hardin
Jonelle Scheetz
Brett Tunno


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 37 (Friday, February 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11789-11791]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03762]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2021-0002]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: New or modified Base (1-percent annual chance) Flood
Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)
boundaries or zone designations, and/or regulatory floodways
(hereinafter referred to as flood hazard determinations) as shown on
the indicated Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) for each of the communities
listed in the table below are finalized. Each LOMR revises the Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and in some cases the Flood Insurance
Study (FIS) reports, currently in effect for the listed communities.
The flood hazard determinations modified by each LOMR will be used to
calculate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and their
contents.

DATES: Each LOMR was finalized as in the table below.

ADDRESSES: Each LOMR is available for inspection at both the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the table below and online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) makes the final flood hazard determinations as shown in the
LOMRs for each community listed in the table below. Notice of these
modified flood hazard determinations has been published in newspapers
of local circulation and 90 days have elapsed since that publication.
The Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation has
resolved any appeals resulting from this notification.
    The modified flood hazard determinations are made pursuant to
section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4105, and are in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of
1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., and with 44 CFR part 65.
    For rating purposes, the currently effective community number is
shown and must be used for all new policies and renewals.
    The new or modified flood hazard information is the basis for the
floodplain management measures that the community is required either to
adopt or to show evidence of being already in effect in order to remain
qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
    This new or modified flood hazard information, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities.
    This new or modified flood hazard determinations are used to meet
the floodplain management requirements of the NFIP and are used to
calculate the appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new
buildings, and for the contents in those buildings. The changes in
flood hazard determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    Interested lessees and owners of real property are encouraged to
review the final flood hazard information available at the address
cited below for each community or online through the FEMA Map Service
Center at https://msc.fema.gov.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Location and case   Chief executive,  officer of
        State and county                  No.                    community             Community map, repository   Date of  modification   Community No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colorado:
    Eagle (FEMA Docket No.: B-    Town of Basalt (20-  Mr. Ryan Mahoney, Manager,    Town Hall, 101 Midland        Jan. 26, 2021........          080052
     2067).                        08-0275P).           Town of Basalt, 101 Midland   Avenue, Basalt, CO 81621.
                                                        Avenue, Basalt, CO 81621.
    Eagle (FEMA Docket No.: B-    Unincorporated       Mr. Jeff Schroll, Eagle       Eagle County Engineering      Jan. 26, 2021........          080051
     2067).                        areas of Eagle       County Manager, P.O. Box      Department, 500 Broadway
                                   County (20-08-       850, Eagle, CO 81631.         Street, Eagle, CO 81631.
                                   0275P).
Connecticut: Fairfield (FEMA      Town of Darien (20-  The Honorable Jayme J.        Planning and Zoning           Jan. 22, 2021........          090005
 Docket No.: B-2067).              01-0611P).           Stevenson, First Selectman,   Department, 2 Renshaw Road,
                                                        Town of Darien Board of       Darien, CT 06820.
                                                        Selectmen, 2 Renshaw Road,
                                                        Room 202, Darien, CT 06820.
Florida:
    Bay (FEMA Docket No.: B-      City of Panama City  The Honorable Mark Sheldon,   Building Division, 116 South  Jan. 28, 2021........          120013
     2067).                        Beach (20-04-        Mayor, City of Panama City    Arnold Road, Panama City
                                   1474P).              Beach, 116 South Arnold       Beach, FL 32413.
                                                        Road, Panama City Beach, FL
                                                        32413.
    Collier (FEMA Docket No.: B-  City of Marco        Mr. Mike McNees, Manager,     Building Services             Jan. 22, 2021........          120426
     2067).                        Island (20-04-       City of Marco Island, 50      Department, 50 Bald Eagle
                                   4781P).              Bald Eagle Drive, Marco       Drive, Marco Island, FL
                                                        Island, FL 34145.             34145.
    Collier (FEMA Docket No.: B-  City of Naples (20-  The Honorable Teresa          Building Department, 295      Jan. 19, 2021........          125130
     2064).                        04-3512P).           Heitmann, Mayor, City of      Riverside Circle, Naples,
                                                        Naples, 735 8th Street        FL 34102.
                                                        South, 2nd Floor, Naples,
                                                        FL 34102.

    Lee (FEMA Docket No.: B-      Town of Fort Myers   The Honorable Ray Murphy,     Community Development         Jan. 19, 2021........          120673
     2067).                        Beach (20-04-        Mayor, Town of Fort Myers     Department, 2525 Estero
                                   3679P).              Beach, 2525 Estero            Boulevard, Fort Myers
                                                        Boulevard, Fort Myers         Beach, FL 33931.
                                                        Beach, FL 33931.
    Monroe (FEMA Docket No.: B-   Unincorporated       The Honorable Heather         Monroe County Building        Jan. 19, 2021........          125129
     2067).                        areas of Monroe      Carruthers, Mayor, Monroe     Department, 2798 Overseas
                                   County (20-04-       County Board of               Highway, Suite 300,
                                   4173P).              Commissioners, 500            Marathon, FL 33050.
                                                        Whitehead Street, Suite
                                                        102, Key West, FL 33040.
    Palm Beach (FEMA Docket No.:  Unincorporated       The Honorable Dave Kerner,    Palm Beach County Department  Jan. 29, 2021........          120192
     B-2067).                      areas of Palm        Mayor, Palm Beach County,     of Planning, Zoning and
                                   Beach County (19-    301 North Olive Avenue,       Building Department, 2300
                                   04-6690P).           Suite 1201, West Palm         North Jog Road, West Palm
                                                        Beach, FL 33401.              Beach, FL 33401.
Maine: Knox (FEMA Docket No.: B-  Town of Vinalhaven   Mr. Andrew J. Dorr, Manger,   Planning and Community        Jan. 29, 2021........          230230
 2073).                            (20-01-0545P).       Town of Vinalhaven, 19        Development Department, 19
                                                        Washington School Road,       Washington School Road,
                                                        Vinalhaven, ME 04863.         Vinalhaven, ME 04863.
Montana: Lewis and Clack (FEMA    City of Helena (20-  The Honorable Wilmot          City Hall, 316 North Park     Jan. 28, 2021........          300040
 Docket No.: B-2067).              08-0095P).           Collins, Mayor, City of       Avenue, Helena, MT 59623.
                                                        Helena, 316 North Park
                                                        Avenue, Room 323, Helena,
                                                        MT 59623.
New Hampshire:
    Rockingham (FEMA Docket No.:  Town of Salem (20-   Mr. Christopher A. Dillon,    Town Hall, 33 Geremonty       Jan. 19, 2021........          330142
     B-2067).                      01-0650P).           Manager, Town of Salem, 33    Drive, Salem, NH 03079.
                                                        Geremonty Drive, Salem, NH
                                                        03079.
    Strafford (FEMA Docket No.:   City of Dover (20-   The Honorable Robert          Planning Department, 288      Jan. 26, 2021........          330145
     B-2067).                      01-0517P).           Carrier, Mayor, City of       Central Avenue, Dover, NH
                                                        Dover, 288 Central Avenue,    03820.
                                                        Dover, NH 03820.
Oklahoma:
    Payne (FEMA Docket No.: B-    City of Stillwater   The Honorable Will Joyce,     Development Services          Jan.22, 2021.........          405380
     2067).                        (20-06-0276P).       Mayor, City of Stillwater,    Department, 723 South Lewis
                                                        723 South Lewis Street,       Street, Stillwater, OK
                                                        Stillwater, OK 74047.         74047.
    Payne (FEMA Docket No.: B-    Unincorporated       The Honorable Kent Bradley,   Payne County Administrative   Jan. 22, 2021........          400493
     2067).                        areas of Payne       Chairman, Payne County        Building, 315 West 6th
                                   County (20-06-       Board of Commissioners, 506   Street, Suite 203,
                                   0276P).              Expo Circle South,            Stillwater, OK 74074.
                                                        Stillwater, OK 74074.
South Carolina: Lexington (FEMA   Unincorporated       The Honorable Scott           Lexington County Community    Jan. 22, 2021........          450129
 Docket No.: B-2064).              areas of Lexington   Whetstone, Chairman,          Development Department, 212
                                   County (20-04-       Lexington County Council,     South Lake Drive, Suite
                                   1249P).              212 South Lake Drive, Suite   601, Lexington, SC 29072.
                                                        601, Lexington, SC 29072.
Tennessee:
    Shelby (FEMA Docket No.: B-   City of Memphis (20- The Honorable Jim             Engineering Division, 125     Jan. 27, 2021........          470177
     2067).                        04-1185P).           Strickland, Mayor, City of    North Main Street, Room
                                                        Memphis, 125 North Main       677, Memphis, TN 38103.
                                                        Street, Room 700, Memphis,
                                                        TN 38103.
    Shelby (FEMA Docket No.: B-   Unincorporated       The Honorable Lee Harris,     Shelby County Department of   Jan. 27, 2021........          470214
     2067).                        areas of Shelby      Mayor, Shelby County, 160     Engineering, 6463 Haley
                                   County (20-04-       North Main Street, Memphis,   Road, Memphis, TN 38134.
                                   1185P).              TN 38103.
Texas:
    Bexar (FEMA Docket No.: B-    City of San Antonio  The Honorable Ron Nirenberg,  Transportation and Capital    Feb. 1, 2021.........          480045
     2073).                        (19-06-1446P).       Mayor, City of San Antonio,   Improvements Department,
                                                        P.O. Box 839966, San          Stormwater Division, 114
                                                        Antonio, TX 78283.            West Commerce, 7th Floor,
                                                                                San Antonio, TX 78205.
    Bexar (FEMA Docket No.: B-    City of San Antonio  The Honorable Ron Nirenberg,  Transportation and Capital    Jan. 25, 2021........          480045
     2073).                        (19-06-3670P).       Mayor, City of San Antonio,   Improvements Department,
                                                        P.O. Box 839966, San          Stormwater Division, 114
                                                        Antonio, TX 78283.            West Commerce, 7th Floor,
                                                                                San Antonio, TX 78205.
    Dallas (FEMA Docket No.: B-   City of Dallas (20-  The Honorable Eric Johnson,   Floodplain Management         Feb. 1, 2021.........          480171
     2073).                        06-0418P).           Mayor, City of Dallas, 1500   Department, 320 East
                                                        Marilla Street, Suite 5EN,    Jefferson Boulevard, Suite
                                                        Dallas, TX 75201.             307, Dallas, TX 75203.
    Dallas (FEMA Docket No.: B-   City of Dallas (20-  The Honorable Eric Johnson,   Floodplain Management         Feb. 1, 2021.........          480171
     2073).                        06-1125P).           Mayor, City of Dallas, 1500   Department, 320 East
                                                        Marilla Street, Suite 5EN,    Jefferson Boulevard, Suite
                                                        Dallas, TX 75201.             307, Dallas, TX 75203.
    Dallas (FEMA Docket No.: B-   City of Farmers      The Honorable Robert C. Dye,  City Hall, 13000 William      Feb. 1, 2021.........          480174
     2073).                        Branch (20-06-       Mayor, City of Farmers        Dodson Parkway, Farmers
                                   1125P).              Branch, 13000 William         Branch, TX 75234.
                                                        Dodson Parkway, Farmers
                                                        Branch, TX 75234.
    Denton (FEMA Docket No.: B-   City of Sanger (20-  The Honorable Thomas Muir,    City Hall, 201 Bolivar        Jan. 25, 2021........          480786
     2067).                        06-1045P).           Mayor, City of Sanger, P.O.   Street, Sanger, TX 76266.
                                                        Box 1729, Sanger, TX 76266.
    Denton (FEMA Docket No.: B-   Unincorporated       The Honorable Andy Eads,      Denton County Public Works,   Jan. 25, 2021........          480774
     2067).                        areas of Denton      Denton County Judge, 110      Engineering Department,
                                   County (20-06-       West Hickory Street, 2nd      1505 East McKinney Street,
                                   1045P).              Floor, Denton, TX 76201.      Suite 175, Denton, TX
                                                                                76209.

    Harris (FEMA Docket No.: B-   Unincorporated       The Honorable Lina Hidalgo,   Harris County Permit Office,  Feb. 1, 2021.........          480287
     2076).                        areas of Harris      Harris County Judge, 1001     10555 Northwest Freeway,
                                   County (20-06-       Preston Street, Suite 911,    Suite 120, Houston, TX
                                   2019P).              Houston, TX 77002.            77092.
    Tarrant (FEMA Docket No.: B-  City of Crowley (20- The Honorable Billy P.        City Hall, 201 East Main      Feb. 1, 2021.........          480591
     2073).                        06-1367P).           Davis, Mayor, City of         Street, Crowley, TX 76036.
                                                        Crowley, 201 East Main
                                                        Street, Crowley, TX 76036.
    Tarrant (FEMA Docket No.: B-  City of Fort Worth   The Honorable Betsy Price,    Transportation and Public     Jan. 25, 2021........          480596
     2064).                        (20-06-1803P).       Mayor, City of Fort Worth,    Works Department,
                                                        200 Texas Street, Fort        Engineering Vault, 200
                                                        Worth, TX 76102.              Texas Street, Fort Worth,
                                                                                TX 76102.
Utah: Davis (FEMA Docket No.: B-  City of Clearfield   Mr. J.J. Allen, Manager,      City Hall, 55 South State     Jan. 19, 2021........          490041
 2064).                            (20[dash]08[dash]0   City of Clearfield, 55        Street, Clearfield, UT
                                   266P).               South State Street,           84015.
                                                        Clearfield, UT 84015.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2021-03762 Filed 2-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request EPA, OECA, Manufacturing, Energy and Transportation Division 2. OMB control number b. G None a 2 0 6 0  0 1 5 6 3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. G New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. X Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. X Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. X Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title: Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources; Rubber Tire Manufacturing, Subpart 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart BBB 8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) 1158.07 9. Keywords : Clean Air Act, Environmental Protection, Air Polution Control 10. Abstract: NSPS Subpart BBB applies to affected facilities in rubber tire manufacturing plants that commence construction, modification or reconstruction after January 20, 1983. The affected facilities include: each underthread cementing operation, each sidewall cementing operation, each tread end cementing operation, each bead cementing operation, each green tire spraying operation, each Michelin A operation, each Michelin B operation, each Michelin C automatic operation. The rule establishes standards for VOCs use and emission limits. Monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements allow the regulatory agencies to determine compliance with the standard. One time reports are required to identify the affected facilities and the compliance method used. Notification of Method 25 test is also required. Annual reports of Method 24 results are required to verify VOC content of water based sprays would be required and semiannual reports of excess emissions.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. G Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. P Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 43 b. Total annual responses 79 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 0 c. Total annual hours requested 13,151 d. Current OMB inventory 18,651 e. Difference ( 5,500) f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 0 2. Adjustment ( 5,500) 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars) a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) $ 17 c. Total annualized cost requested $ 17 d. Current OMB inventory $ 485 e. Difference $ 468 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change 0 2. Adjustment ( 468)

15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. P Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. X Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. X Reporting 1. Q On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. X Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. X Other ( describe) Initial 17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes X No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Maria T. Malave Phone: 202 564 7027 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with'

5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3):

( I) Why the information is being collected;

( ii) Use of information;

( iii) Burden estimate;

( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Office Official Michael Alushin, Director Compliance Assessment and Media Programs Division Office of Compliance Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Environmental Information ( OEI) Date OMB 83 I Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions 5 CFR 1320.9 reads " As part of the agency submission to OMB of a proposed collection of information, the agency ( through the head of the agency, the Senior Official or their designee) shall certify ( and provide a record supporting such certification) that the proposed collection of information  "( a) is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including that the information to be collected will have practical utility; "( b) is not unnecessarily duplicative of information otherwise reasonably accessible to the agency; "( c) reduces to the extent practicable and appropriate the burden on persons who shall provide information to or for the agency, including with respect to small entities, as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U. S. C § 601( 6)), the use of such techniques as: "( 1) establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to those who are to respond; "( 2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements; or collection of information , or any part thereof; "( 3) an exemption from coverage of the collection of information, or any part thereof; "( d) is written using plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology and is understandable to those who are to respond; "( e) is to be implemented in ways consistent and compatible, to the maximum extent practicable, with the existing reporting and recordkeeping practices of those who are to respond; "( f) indicates for each recordkeeping requirement the length of time persons are required to maintain the records specified; "( g) informs potential respondents of the information called for under § 1320.8( b)( 3); [ see below] "( h) has been developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected, including the processing of the information in a manner which shall enhance, where appropriate, the utility of the information to agencies and the public; "( i) uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology appropriate to the purpose for which the information is to be collected; and "( j) to the maximum extent practicable, uses appropriate information technology to reduce burden and improve data quality, agency efficiency and responsiveness to the public." NOTE: 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3) requires that each collection of information: "( 3) informs and provides reasonable notice to the potential persons to whom the collection of information is addressed of: "( i) the reasons the information is planned to be and/ or has been collected; "( ii) the way such information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( iii) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the average burden of the collection ( together with a request that the public direct to the agency any comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden); "( iv) whether responses to the collection of information are voluntary, required to obtain or retain a benefit ( citing authority), or mandatory ( citing authority); "( v) the nature and extent of confidentiality to be provided, if any ( citing authority); and "( vi) the fact that any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number."


[Federal Register: October 20, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 202)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64633-64636]
[DOCID:fr20oc10-2]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-1036; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-247-AD;
Amendment 39-16480; AD 2010-22-01]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300,
and -300F Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for the products listed above. That AD currently requires repetitive
inspections for fatigue cracking and corrosion of the upper link fuse
pin of the nacelle struts, and related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. The existing AD also provides terminating action
for the repetitive inspections. This AD revises certain criteria for
the terminating action. This AD was prompted by two reports of cracked
upper link fuse pins. We are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue
cracking or corrosion of the upper link fuse pin, which could result in
failure of the fuse pin and consequent reduced structural integrity of
the nacelle strut and possible separation of the strut and engine from
the airplane during flight.

DATES: This AD is effective November 4, 2010.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of November 4,
2010.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain other publication listed in this AD as of
November 5, 2009 (74 FR 50692, October 1, 2009).
    We must receive comments on this AD by December 6, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box
3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Berhane Alazar, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 917-6577; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    On September 18, 2009, we issued AD 2009-20-09, Amendment 39-16032
(74 FR 50692, October 1, 2009), for certain Model 767-200, -300, and -
300F series airplanes. That AD requires repetitive inspections for
fatigue cracking and corrosion of the upper link fuse pin of the
nacelle struts, and related investigative and corrective actions if
necessary. That AD also provides terminating action for the repetitive
inspections. That AD resulted from two reports of cracked upper link
fuse pins. We issued that AD to prevent fatigue cracking or corrosion
of the upper link fuse pin, which could result in failure of the fuse
pin and consequent reduced structural integrity of the nacelle strut
and possible separation of the strut and engine from the airplane
during flight.

Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued

    We have learned that paragraph (h) of AD 2009-20-09 incorrectly
identifies the pin replacement as acceptable for compliance with the
optional strut modification specified in paragraph (g) of that AD.
Rather, replacing the pin terminates only the repetitive inspections of
the pins as required by paragraph (g) of this AD; replacing the pin
does not terminate the requirement for the strut modification. We have
removed credit for replacement of the fuse pins with new fuse pins from
paragraph (h) of the existing AD (specified as paragraph (i) in this
AD) because it is not a terminating action. We have added new paragraph
(j) in this AD to specify that replacement of the fuse pins terminates
the repetitive inspection requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD, and
the strut modification is still required.
    We have also revised paragraph (b) of this AD to clarify that
certain requirements of this AD terminate certain requirements of AD
2000-19-09, Amendment 39-11910 (65 FR 58641, October 2, 2000), and AD
2004-16-12, Amendment 39-13768 (69 FR 51002, August 17, 2004).

Explanation of Additional Paragraph in the AD

    We have added a new paragraph (d) to this AD to provide the Air
Transport Association (ATA) of America subject code 54: Nacelles/
Pylons. This code is added to make this AD parallel with other new AD
actions. We have reidentified subsequent paragraphs accordingly.

FAA's Determination

    We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type
designs.

AD Requirements

    This AD requires repetitive inspections for fatigue cracking and
corrosion of the upper link fuse pin of the nacelle struts, and related
investigative and corrective actions if necessary. This AD also
provides terminating action for the repetitive inspections.

FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because this
AD shortens the time for the repetitive intervals. Therefore, we find
that notice and opportunity for prior public comment are impracticable
and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less
than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public
comment. However, we invite you to send any written data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-1036; Directorate
Identifier 2009-NM-247-AD;'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 354 airplanes of U.S. registry.
This new AD adds no new costs to affected operators. The current costs
for this AD are repeated for the convenience of affected operators, as
follows:

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Action                        Labor cost          Parts cost      Cost per product                   Cost on U.S. operators
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection of fuse pins (requirement   4 work-hours x $85 per             $0  $340 per inspection       $120,360 per inspection cycle.
 of AD 2009-20-09).                     hour = $340 per                        cycle.
                                        inspection cycle.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs''
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2009-20-09, Amendment 39-16032 (74 FR 50692, October 1, 2009), and
adding the following new AD:

2010-22-01 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-16480; Docket No. FAA-
2010-1036; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-247-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD is effective November 4, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2009-20-09, Amendment 39-16032.
Certain requirements of this AD terminate certain requirements of AD
2000-19-09, Amendment 39-11910, and AD 2004-16-12, Amendment 39-
13768.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300,
and -300F series airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-54A0074, Revision 1,
dated April 24, 2008.

Subject

    (d) Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport
Association (ATA) of America Code 54: Nacelles/Pylons.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD was prompted by two reports of cracked upper link
fuse pins. We are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue cracking or
corrosion of the upper link fuse pin, which could result in failure
of the fuse pin and consequent reduced structural integrity of the
nacelle strut and possible separation of the strut and engine from
the airplane during flight.

Compliance

    (f) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2009-20-09, With Revised Credit
Provisions in Paragraph (I) of This AD

Initial and Repetitive Inspections/Investigative and Corrective
Actions

    (g) Inspect the upper link fuse pin of the nacelle struts for
fatigue cracking and corrosion at the applicable time specified in
Table 1 of this AD. Do the applicable inspection by doing all the
applicable actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-54A0074, Revision 1, dated April
24, 2008; and do all applicable related investigative and corrective
actions before further flight. Repeat the applicable inspection at
intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight cycles or 24 months, whichever
is first, until the requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD have
been done.

                        Table 1--Compliance Times
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          At the later of:
                          ----------------------------------------------
       Engine type          Initial inspection
                                threshold             Grace period
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JT9D.....................  14,000 total flight  Within 3,000 flight
                            cycles.              cycles or 18 months
                                                 after November 5, 2009
                                                 (the effective date of
                                                 AD 2009[dash]20-09),
                                                 whichever is first.
CF6-80A..................  24,000 total flight  Within 3,000 flight
                            cycles.              cycles or 18 months
                                                 after November 5, 2009,
                                                 whichever is first.
PW4000...................  8,000 total flight   Within 3,000 flight
                            cycles.              cycles or 18 months
                                                 after November 5, 2009,
                                                 whichever is first.
CF6-80C2.................  10,000 total flight  Within 3,000 flight
                            cycles.              cycles or 18 months
                                                 after November 5, 2009,
                                                 whichever is first.
RB211....................  24,000 total flight  Within 3,000 flight
                            cycles.              cycles or 18 months
                                                 after November 5, 2009,
                                                 whichever is first.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Note 1: The upper link inspections can be done with the pylon
and/or engine in any position.

    Note 2: In paragraph 3.B, Steps 4.b.(1)(a) and
4.b.(2)(b)(2){a{time}  of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 767-54A0074, Revision 1, dated April 24,
2008, the procedures specify to apply two layers of Boeing Material
Specification (BMS) 10-11 primer to the inside surface of the fuse
pin if no crack indication is found. However, two layers of primer
are only necessary to touch up bare areas on the fuse pin if no
crack indication is found.

Terminating Action in AD 2000-19-09, Amendment 39-11910, and AD 2004-
16-12, Amendment 39-13768

    (h) Accomplishment of the modification specified in paragraph
(h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, as applicable, terminates the
inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (1) For Model 767 series airplanes powered by Rolls-Royce RB211
series engines, as identified in AD 2000-19-09: Modification of the
nacelle strut and wing structure, as required by paragraphs (a) and
(b) of AD 2000-19-09.
    (2) For Model 767-200, -300, and -300F series airplanes powered
by Pratt & Whitney and General Electric engines, as identified in AD
2004-16-12: Modification of the nacelle strut and wing structure, as
required by paragraphs (a), (b), (d), and (e) of AD 2004-16-12.

Credit for Inspection Done Using Previous Service Information

    (i) Inspection of the fuse pins before November 5, 2009, in
accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 767-54-0074, dated March 27,
1997, is acceptable for compliance with the inspections required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, except that operator's equivalent
procedures are not allowed.

New Requirements of This AD

Optional Terminating Action for Inspections

    (j) Replacement of the fuse pins with new fuse pins (not
serviceable fuse pins), in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin
767-54-0074, dated March 27, 1997; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
767-54A0074, Revision 1, dated April 24, 2008; terminates the
repetitive inspections of the fuse pins required by paragraph (g) of
this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (k)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD. Information may be e-mailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your Principal
Maintenance Inspector or Principal Avionics Inspector, as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD. AMOCs that specified using new pins
(not serviceable pins) approved previously in accordance with AD
2009-20-09, Amendment 39-16032, are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of paragraph (h) of this AD.

Related Information

    (l) For more information about this AD, contact Berhane Alazar,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (m) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-54A0074,
Revision 1, dated April 24, 2008, to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. If you accomplish the
optional terminating actions specified in this AD, you must use
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-54A0074, Revision 1, dated April
24, 2008; or Boeing Service Bulletin 767-54-0074, dated March 27,
1997; to perform those actions, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of Boeing Service Bulletin 767-54-0074,
dated March 27, 1997, under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the
incorporation by reference of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-
54A0074, Revision 1, dated April 24, 2008, on November 5, 2009 (74
FR 50692, October 1, 2009).
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 6, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-26224 Filed 10-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34678-34679]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14881]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2014-D-1242]

Content and Format of Abbreviated 510(k)s for Early Growth
Response 1 Gene Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization Test System for
Specimen Characterization Devices; Guidance for Industry and Food and
Drug Administration Staff; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of the guidance entitled ``Content and Format for
Abbreviated 510(k)s for Early Growth Response 1 (EGR1) Gene
Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization (FISH) Test System for Specimen
Characterization Devices.'' This guidance provides industry and Agency
staff with recommendations for the suggested format and content of an
abbreviated 510(k) submission for EGR1 gene FISH test system for
specimen characterization devices.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on this guidance at
any time. General comments on Agency guidance documents are welcome at
any time.

ADDRESSES: An electronic copy of the guidance document is available for
download from the Internet. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for information on electronic access to the guidance. Submit written
requests for a single hard copy of the guidance document entitled
``Content and Format for Abbreviated 510(k)s for Early Growth Response
1 (EGR1) Gene Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization (FISH) Test System for
Specimen Characterization Devices'' to the Office of the Center
Director, Guidance and Policy Development, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5431, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one self-
addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your
request.
    Submit electronic comments on the guidance to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shyam Kalavar, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5568, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    This guidance document was developed to provide industry and Agency
staff with recommendations for the suggested format and content of an
abbreviated 510(k) submission for EGR1 gene FISH test system for
specimen characterization devices and recommendations for addressing
certain labeling issues relevant to the review process specific to
these devices. An EGR1 gene FISH test system for specimen
characterization is a device intended to detect the EGR1 probe target
on chromosome 5q in bone marrow specimens from patients with acute
myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. The assay results are
intended to be interpreted only by a qualified pathologist or
cytogeneticist. These devices do not include automated systems that
directly report results without review and interpretation by a
qualified pathologist or cytogeneticist. These devices also do not
include any device intended for use to select patient therapy, predict
patient response to therapy, or to screen for disease as well as any
device with a claim for a particular diagnosis, prognosis, and
monitoring or risk assessment.
    In the Federal Register of September 26, 2014 (79 FR 57939), the
Agency issued the draft guidance entitled ``Content and Format for
Abbreviated 510(k)s for Early Growth Response 1 (EGR1) Gene
Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization (FISH) Test System for Specimen
Characterization Devices.'' The Agency received no comments on the
draft guidance dated September 26, 2014.

II. Significance of Guidance

    This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
current thinking of FDA on ``Content and

Format for Abbreviated 510(k)s for Early Growth Response 1 (EGR1) Gene
Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization (FISH) Test System for Specimen
Characterization Devices.'' It does not establish any rights for any
person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or http://www.regulations.gov.

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This guidance refers to currently approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collections of information in 21 CFR part 807, subpart E, are currently
approved under OMB control number 0910-0120 and the collections of
information in 21 CFR 809.10 are currently approved under 0910-0485.

V. Comments

    Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to http://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: June 12, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-14881 Filed 6-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P