[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 143 (Thursday, July 25, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35875-35879]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15791]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2019-N-0305]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Deeming Tobacco
Products To Be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by August
26, 2019.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0768.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amber Sanford, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.

Deeming Tobacco Products To Be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act

OMB Control Number 0910-0768--Extension

    The Tobacco Control Act, enacted on June 22, 2009, amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) and provided FDA with
the authority to regulate tobacco products (Pub. L. 111-31; 123 Stat.
1776). Specifically, section 101(b) of the Tobacco Control Act amended
the FD&C Act by adding chapter IX (21 U.S.C. 387 through 387u), which
provides FDA with tools to regulate tobacco products. Section 901 of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 387a) states that Chapter IX--Tobacco Products
applies to all cigarettes, cigarette tobacco, roll-your-own tobacco,
and smokeless tobacco and to any other tobacco products that the
Secretary of Health and Human Services by regulation deems to be
subject to this chapter.
    The FD&C Act provides FDA authority to regulate cigarettes,
cigarette tobacco, roll-your-own tobacco, smokeless tobacco, and any
other tobacco products that the Agency by regulation deems to be
subject to the law. On May 10, 2016 (81 FR 28973) FDA issued a final
rule to deem products meeting the statutory definition of ``tobacco
product'' to be subject to the FD&C Act. This final rule extended FDA's
``tobacco product'' authorities under Chapter IX to all tobacco
products that meet the statutory definition of ``tobacco product'' in
section 201(rr) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 321(rr)).
    Section 910(a)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 387j(a)(1)) defines a
``new tobacco product'' as a tobacco product that was not commercially
marketed in the United States on February 15, 2007, or a modification
(including a change in design, any component, any part, or any
constituent, including a smoke constituent, or in the content,
delivery, or form of nicotine, or any other additive or ingredient) of
a tobacco product where the modified product was commercially marketed
in the United States after February 15, 2007. An order under section
910(c)(1)(A)(i) of the FD&C Act is required prior to marketing a new
tobacco product. This requirement applies unless the product has been
shown to be substantially equivalent to a valid predicate product or is
exempt from substantial equivalence.
    Section 910(b) of the FD&C Act states that a premarket tobacco
application (PMTA) shall contain full reports of all investigations of
health risks; a full statement of all components, ingredients,
additives, and properties, and of the principle or principles of
operation of such tobacco product; a full description of methods of
manufacturing and processing (which includes a listing of all
manufacturing, packaging, and control sites for the product); an
explanation of how the product complies with applicable tobacco product
standards; samples of the product and its components; and labeling.
    FDA also encourages persons who would like to study their new
tobacco product to meet with the Office of Science in the Center for
Tobacco Products (CTP) to discuss their investigational plan. The
request for a meeting should be sent in writing to the Director of
CTP's Office of Science and should include adequate information for FDA
to assess the potential utility of the meeting and to identify FDA
staff necessary to discuss agenda items.
    When the deeming final rule published, FDA revised the following
information collections that added deemed products to these
collections: Tobacco Product Establishment Registration and Submission
of Certain Health Information (OMB control number 0910-0650); Tobacco
Health Document Submission (OMB control number 0910-0654); Exemptions
from Substantial Equivalence Requirements (OMB control number 0910-
0684); Reports Intended to Demonstrate the Substantial Equivalence of a
New Tobacco Product (OMB control number 0910-0673); Electronic
Importer's Entry Notice (OMB control number 0910-0046); Exports:
Notification and Recordkeeping Requirements (OMB control number 0910-
0482); and Establishing That a Tobacco Product Was Commercially
Marketed in the United States as of February 15, 2007 (OMB control
number 0910-0775).
    In the Federal Register of April 22, 2019 (84 FR 16673), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the extension of
collection of information ``Deeming Tobacco Products To Be Subject to
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.'' FDA received one comment
that was Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) related.
    The commenter noted that they would like to see the associated
collections that the deeming rule revised. FDA appreciates the comment
addressing the associated deemed product information collections. FDA
notes that in the PRA section of the deeming final rule (81 FR 28973 at
29076) all the revised OMB information collection control numbers and
their revised burdens were all listed. Per the comment, we have added a
listing of all the collections the final rule revised.
    The commenter also notes that the burdens associated with deemed
products are not all included in this notice even though the notice
``appears intended to present a comprehensive set of burden estimates
and analyses for information collection activities associated with . .
. the Deeming Rule.'' FDA notes that this notice is not intended to
cover all information collection reviews associated with the deeming
rule. Instead, this notice only covers the information collections that
did not already have an approved collection prior to the deeming final
rule. For the collections that existed prior to the deeming final rule,
FDA added the new associated deeming-related burdens to these
previously approved OMB control numbers. We also note that some of the
estimates from the PRA section of the deeming rule may have changed
since the final rule published. If any estimates have changed, these
changes have been published in the Federal Register through the process
associated with renewing PRA collections.
    The comment also mentions the omission of the burden associated
with the submission of harmful and potentially harmful constituents
(HPHC) listings. FDA notes that we have not yet sought OMB approval of
the burden associated with listing and reporting HPHCs for deemed
products. On March 8, 2019, FDA revised the ``Extension of Certain
Tobacco Product Compliance Deadlines Related to the Final Deeming
Rule'' guidance (https://www.fda.gov/media/105346/download) and the
related Small Entity Compliance Guide entitled ``FDA Deems Certain
Tobacco Products Subject to FDA Authority, Sales and Distribution
Restrictions, and Health Warning Requirements for Packages and
Advertisements'' (https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/fda-deems-certain-tobacco-products-subject-fda-authority-sales-and-distribution-restrictions-and). This revision
extends the HPHCs reporting compliance date to a date that is 6 months
after the publication date of a final guidance regarding HPHC reporting
under section 904(a)(3) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 287d(a)(3)) and 9
months after that publication date for small tobacco product
manufacturers. For products entering the market after the publication
date of the final guidance, manufacturers must submit their HPHC report
90 days prior to marketing the products under section 904(a)(3).
    In the preamble to the final deeming rule, FDA indicated that it
intends to

issue guidance regarding HPHC reporting (and later a testing and
reporting regulation under section 915 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
387o)) with enough time for manufacturers to report, given the original
3-year compliance period. At this time, FDA has not published a final
HPHC reporting guidance and as a result, we are providing a revised
compliance date based on when a final HPHC reporting guidance is
issued.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                 Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Average
                                     Number of       Number of     Total annual     burden per
            Activity                respondents    responses per     responses     response  (in    Total hours
                                                    respondent                        hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Obtaining an FDA Order
 Authorizing Marketing of
 Tobacco Product (the
 application) and 21 CFR 25.40
 Environmental Assessments:
    Other Tobacco, E-Cigarettes,             200            3.75             750           1,713       1,284,750
     and Nicotine Product
     Manufacturers (Electronic
     Nicotine Delivery Systems
     (ENDS) Liquids and Delivery
     Systems (Including
     Importers))................
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Total Hours Obtaining an  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............       1,284,750
         FDA Order Authorizing
         Marketing of Tobacco
         Product (the
         application)...........
Request for Meeting with CTP's
 Office of Science to Discuss
 Investigational Plan:
    Other Tobacco, E-Cigarettes,             200               1             200               4             800
     and Nicotine Product
     Manufacturers (Electronic
     Nicotine Delivery Systems
     (ENDS) Liquids and Delivery
     Systems (Including
     Importers))................
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Total Hours Request for   ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............             800
         Meeting with CTP's
         Office of Science to
         Discuss Investigational
         Plan...................
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
            Total Hours           ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............       1,285,550
             ``Applications for
             Premarket Review of
             New Tobacco
             Products''.........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

    FDA estimates that it will take each respondent approximately 1,500
hours to prepare a PMTA seeking an order from FDA allowing the
marketing of a new tobacco product. FDA also estimates that it would on
average take an additional 213 hours to prepare an environmental
assessment in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 25.40, for a
total of 1,713 hours per PMTA application. This average represents a
wide range of hours that will be required for these applications under
different circumstances, with a small number requiring more hours
(e.g., as many as 5,000 hours for early applications that involve
complex products and for which the company has no experience conducting
studies or preparing analysis of public health impacts, or for which
reliance on master files is not possible) as well as many requiring
fewer hours (e.g., as few as 50 hours for applications for products
that are very similar to other new products). A PMTA may require one or
more types of studies including chemical analysis, nonclinical studies,
and clinical studies. FDA also estimates the number of PMTAs that FDA
expects to receive annually will be 750 (642 ENDS Liquids and 108 ENDS
Delivery Systems).
    For tobacco products already on the market at the time of the final
rule, much of the information required to support a PMTA may be
obtained from previously published research on similar products.
Therefore, FDA expects that a large portion of applications may be
reviewed with no or minimal new nonclinical or clinical studies being
conducted to support an application. In contrast, nonclinical and
clinical studies may be required for market authorization of a new
product for which there is limited understanding of its potential
impact on the public health. The range of hours involved to compile
these two types of applications would be quite variable.
    FDA anticipates that the 200 potential respondents to this
collection may need to meet with CTP's Office of Science to discuss
their investigational plans. To request this meeting, applicants should
compile and submit information to FDA for meeting approval. FDA
estimates that it will take approximately 4 hours to compile this
information, for a total of 800 hours additional burden.
    Therefore, the total annual burden for submitting PMTA applications
is estimated to be 1,285,550 hours. FDA's estimates are based on the
corresponding information collection estimates and an assumption that
manufacturers would submit applications for the premarket review of
tobacco products.
    In Sec.  1143.3(c) (21 CFR 1143.3(c)) an exemption is provided to
the manufacturer of a product that otherwise would be required to
include the warning statement in Sec.  1143.3(a)(1) on its packages and
in its advertisements, i.e., ``WARNING: This product contains nicotine.
Nicotine is an addictive chemical.'' This warning is required to appear
on at least 30 percent of the two principal display panels of the
package and on at least 20 percent of the area of the advertisement.
    To obtain an exemption from this requirement, a manufacturer is
required to certify to FDA that its product does not contain nicotine
and that the manufacturer has data to support that assertion. For any
product that obtains this exemption, Sec.  1143.3(c) requires that the
product bear the statement: ``This product is made from tobacco.'' The
parties that package and label such products will share responsibility
for ensuring that this alternative statement is included on product
packages and in advertisements.

                                 Table 2--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Average
                                     Number of       Number of     Total annual     burden per
            Activity                respondents    responses per     responses     response  (in    Total hours
                                                    respondent                        hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certification Statement.........               5               1               5              20             100
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total Exemptions From the     ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............             100
     Required Warning Statement
     Requirement................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

    The estimated average burden per response is based on currently
approved information collection estimates. The estimated hours listed
in the burden table for certification submissions reflect the time
needed to test the product for nicotine and to prepare and submit the
self-certification request. FDA expects that these types of
certifications will be rare and estimates that the Agency will receive
on average five submissions per year.
    FDA concludes that the labeling statements in Sec. Sec.
1143.3(a)(1) and 1143.5(a)(1) and the alternative statement in Sec.
1143.3(c) (i.e., ``This product is made from tobacco'') are not subject
to review by OMB because they do not constitute a ``collection of
information'' under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). Rather, these
labeling statements are a ``public disclosure'' of information
originally supplied by the Federal government to the recipient for the
purpose of ``disclosure to the public'' (5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2)).

                                 Table 3--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Average
                                     Number of       Number of     Total annual     burden per
       Cigar warning plan           respondents    responses per     responses     response  (in    Total hours
                                                    respondent                        hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturers, Importers, and                 10               1              10             120           1,200
 Retailers......................
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total Cigar Warning Plan....  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............           1,200
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

    The requirement for submission of warning plans for cigar products,
and the specific requirements relating to the random display and
distribution of required warning statements on cigar packaging and
quarterly rotation of required warning statements in alternating
sequence on cigar product advertising, appear in Sec.  1143.5(c).
    The six warnings for cigars (five specifically for cigars and the
one addictiveness warning) are required to be randomly displayed in
each 12-month period, in as equal a number of times as is possible on
each brand of cigar sold in product packaging and be randomly
distributed in all areas of the United States in which the product is
marketed in accordance with a warning plan submitted to and approved by
FDA. For advertisements, the warning statements must be rotated
quarterly in alternating sequence in each advertisement for each brand
of cigar in accordance with a warning plan submitted to and approved by
FDA.
    FDA published a final guidance in August 2018 (https://www.fda.gov/downloads/TobaccoProducts/Labeling/RulesRegulationsGuidance/UCM534739.pdf) to assist manufacturers, importers, distributors, and
retailers of cigars with the submission of warning plans. FDA will work
with the submitters to ensure that the plans submitted meet the
established criteria for approval under 21 CFR part 1143.
    The warning statements on cigar packaging must be randomly
displayed in each 12-month period, in as equal a number of times as is
possible on each brand of cigar sold and are required to be randomly
distributed in all areas of the United States in which the product is
marketed in accordance with a warning plan submitted by the responsible
cigar manufacturer, importer, distributor, or retailer to and approved
by FDA.
    FDA also requires that the required warning statements be rotated
quarterly in alternating sequence in each advertisement for each brand
of cigar, regardless of whether the cigar is sold in product packaging.
This rotation of warning statements in cigar advertisements also must
be done in accordance with a warning plan submitted by the responsible
cigar manufacturer, importer, distributor, or retailer to and approved
by FDA.
    The burden estimates are based on FDA's experience with cigar
warning plans, smokeless warning plans associated information
collection (OMB control number 0910-0671), as well as warning plans for
cigarettes submitted to the Federal Trade Commission prior to the
implementation of the Tobacco Control Act on June 22, 2009.
    We estimate 10 entities will submit warning plans, and it will take
an average of 120 hours per respondent to prepare and submit a warning
plan for packaging and advertising for a total of 1,200 hours.

                                 Table 4--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Average
                                     Number of       Number of     Total annual     burden per
            Activity                respondents    responses per     responses     response  (in    Total hours
                                                    respondent                        hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Small-Scale Manufacturer                      75               1              75               2             150
 Reporting......................
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total Small-Scale             ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............             150
     Manufacturer Report........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

    Generally, FDA considers a ``small-scale tobacco product
manufacturer'' to be a manufacturer of any regulated tobacco product
that employs 150 or fewer full-time equivalent employees and has annual
total revenues of $5,000,000 or less. FDA considers a manufacturer to
include each entity that it controls, is controlled by, or is under
common control with such manufacturer. To help make FDA's individual
enforcement decisions more efficient, a manufacturer may voluntarily
submit information regarding employment and revenues. FDA does not
believe many manufacturers who fit the criteria of a small-scale
tobacco product manufacturer would submit the voluntary information.
    FDA estimates that there are approximately 75 small-scale
manufacturers who will voluntarily submit information. FDA believes it
will take respondents 2 hours to voluntarily submit information
regarding employment and revenues for a total of 150 hours.
    The total estimated burden for this information collection is
1,286,950 reporting hours, and 1,040 annual responses. Our estimated
burden for the information collection reflects an overall decrease of
39,050 hours and a corresponding decrease of 315 responses. We
attribute this adjustment to updated information in the number of
submissions we received over the last few years.

    Dated: July 19, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-15791 Filed 7-24-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: June 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 119)]
[Notices]
[Page 29736]
[DOCID:fr23jn09-100]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Advisory Circular 33-7A, Guidance for 30-Second and 2-Minute One-
Engine-Inoperative (OEI) Ratings for Rotorcraft Turbine Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of issuance of advisory circular.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the issuance of Advisory Circular (AC)
33-7A, Guidance for 30-Second and 2-Minute One-Engine-Inoperative (OEI)
Ratings for Rotorcraft Turbine Engines. This AC provides guidance and
acceptable means, but not the only means, for demonstrating compliance
with the specific requirements applicable to 30-second and 2-minute OEI
rotorcraft turbine engine ratings in part 33 of Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR part 33).

DATES: The Engine and Propeller Directorate issued AC 33-7A on June 11,
2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Federal Aviation Administration,
Attn: Donna Mihail, Engine and Propeller Standards Staff, ANE-111, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone: (781)
238-7153; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    We have filed in the docket all substantive comments received, and
a report summarizing them. If you wish to review the docket in person,
you may go to the above address between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you wish to contact the
above individual directly, you can use the above telephone number or e-
mail address provided. How to Obtain Copies: A paper copy of AC 33-7A
may be obtained by writing to the U.S. Department of Transportation,
Subsequent Distribution Office, DOT Warehouse, SVC-121.23, Ardmore East
Business Center, 3341Q 75th Ave., Landover, MD 20785, telephone (301)
322-5377, or by faxing your request to the warehouse at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
The AC will also be available on the Internet at http://www.faa.gov/
regulations policies (then click on ``Advisory Circulars'').

(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44704.)

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on June 11, 2009.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-14617 Filed 6-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register: March 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 43)]
[Notices]
[Page 10341]
[DOCID:fr05mr10-149]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending February
13, 2010

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21
days after the filing of the application.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0031.
    Date Filed: February 9, 2010.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 621.

Special Passenger Amending Resolution 010n, from Hong Kong SAR to
India, (Memo 1355).
Intended effective date: 22 February 2010.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0032.
    Date Filed: February 9, 2010.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 619.

TC3 Special Passenger Amending Resolution 010m between Korea (Rep. of)
and China excluding Hong Kong SAR and Macao SAR, (Memo 1354).
Intended effective date: 15 February 2010.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0033.
    Date Filed: February 12, 2010.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 622.

TC3 Within South East Asia, Special Passenger Amending Resolution 010o
between Viet Nam and Myanmar (Memo 1356).
Intended effective date: 22 February 2010.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-4674 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


[Federal Register: August 6, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 152)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 45610-45611]
[DOCID:fr06au08-6]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 520

[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0039]

Oral Dosage Form New Animal Drugs; Amprolium

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the

animal drug regulations to reflect approval of a supplemental new
animal drug application (NADA) filed by Phibro Animal Health. The
supplemental NADA provides for label revisions associated with a
previous change of sponsorship and other minor changes for amprolium
concentrate solution to make medicated drinking water for chickens and
turkeys for the treatment of coccidiosis. The product approval is being
codified for the first time.

DATES: This rule is effective August 6, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald A. Prater, Center for
Veterinary Medicine (HFV-130), Food and Drug Administration, 7500
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Phibro Animal Health, 65 Challenger Rd., 3d
floor, Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660, filed a supplement to NADA 13-663
that provides for the use of COCCIPROL (amprolium) 9.6% Oral Solution
to make medicated drinking water for chickens and turkeys for the
treatment of coccidiosis. The supplemental NADA provides for label
revisions associated with a previous change of sponsorship and other
minor changes. The supplemental NADA is approved as of July 8, 2008,
and the regulations are amended in 21 CFR 520.100 to reflect the
approval. The product approval is being codified for the first time.
Also, Sec.  520.100 is revised to reflect current pathogen spelling.
    Approval of this supplemental NADA did not require review of
additional safety or effectiveness data or information. Therefore, a
freedom of information summary is not required.
    The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.33(a)(1) that this action
is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is
required.
    This rule does not meet the definition of ``rule'' in 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(A) because it is a rule of ``particular applicability.''
Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements
in 5 U.S.C. 801-808.

List of Subject in 21 CFR Part 520

    Animal drugs.

0
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and
redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 520 is
amended as follows:

PART 520--ORAL DOSAGE FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 520 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.

0
2. In Sec.  520.100, revise paragraph (b), remove paragraph (d),
redesignate paragraph (e) as paragraph (d), and revise new paragraphs
(d)(2)(i)(A) and (d)(2)(i)(B) to read as follows:

Sec.  520.100  Amprolium.

* * * * *
    (b) Sponsors. See sponsors in 510.600(c) of this chapter.
    (1) No. 016592 for use of products described in paragraph (a) of
this section as in paragraph (d) of this section.
    (2) Nos. 051311 and 066104 for use of product described in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section as in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section.
    (3) No. 059130 for use of product described in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section as in paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (i) * * * (A) As an aid in the prevention of coccidiosis caused by
Eimeria bovis and E. zurnii, administer 5 mg per kilogram (mg/kg) body
weight for 21 days during periods of exposure or when experience
indicates that coccidiosis is likely to be a hazard.
    (B) As an aid in the treatment of coccidiosis caused by E. bovis
and E. zurnii, administer 10 mg/kg body weight for 5 days.
* * * * *

    Dated: July 28, 2008.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. E8-18093 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1681]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00419]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, January
15, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Gallagher, as duty officer, voted to consider the
items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.

    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the
Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: January 8, 2015.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-00419 Filed 1-9-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: January 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 14)]
[Notices]
[Page 4179-4180]
[DOCID:fr23ja09-46]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-505-000]

WC Landfill Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

January 14, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
WC Landfill Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is February 3, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed

dockets(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-1352 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14424-14425]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05384]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 15060-000]

Kinet, Inc.; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application Accepted
For Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing
Applications

    On December 3, 2020, Kinet, Inc., filed an application for a
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act
(FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of a conventional hydropower
project located in Jessamine, Woodford, and Mercer Counties, Kentucky.
The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the
permit holder priority to file a license application during the permit
term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder to
perform any land-disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands or
waters owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed Kentucky River Lock and Dam No. 6 Hydroelectric
Project would consist of the following: (1) An existing 465-foot-long,
34-foot-high, timber crib dam with concrete overlay connected to a 280-
foot-long, and 45-foot-wide abandoned navigation lock, which are owned
by the Kentucky River

Authority; (2) a reservoir with a surface area of 666 acres and a
storage capacity of 12,000 acre-feet; (3) five, proposed, 32-foot-long,
9-foot-diameter penstocks connected to five generating units with a
combined capacity of 2.1 megawatts, within the existing lock; (4) a
proposed powerhouse/control room adjacent to the lock; (5) a 30-foot-
long by 63-foot-wide tailrace; and (6) a 270-foot-long, 12.47 kilo-Volt
transmission line. The proposed project would have an estimated annual
generation of 13,998 megawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Dan Panko, Kinet, Inc., 2401 Monarch Street,
Alameda, CA 9401; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Joshua Dub; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications using the Commission's eFiling system at https://ferconline.ferc.gov/FERCOnline.aspx. Commenters can submit brief
comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the
eComment system at https://ferconline.ferc.gov/QuickComment.aspx. You
must include your name and contact information at the end of your
comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, you may submit a paper copy.
Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service must be addressed to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426. Submissions sent via
any other carrier must be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville,
Maryland 20852.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the
Commission's website at https://elibrary.ferc.gov/eLibrary/search.
Enter the docket number (P-15060) in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: March 10, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-05384 Filed 3-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20460

OFFICE OF

PREVENTION, PESTICIDES

AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES

May 24, 2007

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:   	Triadimefon (Chemical No. 109901).  Federal Register Notice;
Close-out of the 	180-day public comment period for Voluntary Use
Cancellations

This memorandum serves to finalize the Agency’s actions regarding the
close-out of the 180-day public comment period for the Federal Register
Notice (FRN) announcing voluntary cancellations of all use on apples,
pears, grapes, and raspberries (commercial and residential) as well as
use on residential turf for certain products containing the pesticide
triadimefon. During the 180-day public comment period for the FRN, the
Agency did not receive any comments in reference to the above-mentioned
use cancellations.  Therefore, the Agency considers the voluntary
cancellations for the specified uses of triadimefon to be complete and
final.  The FRN addressed, herein, as well as all other supporting
documents pertaining to triadimefon, are available via the Agency’s
electronic docket on the internet at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.regulations.gov"  http://www.regulations.gov  under docket
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0258.


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38397-38400]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15342]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-92407; File No. SR-CboeBYX-2021-016]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Its Fee Schedule

July 14, 2021.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 1, 2021, Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``BYX'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``BYX'') proposes to
amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/byx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to adopt a new
Step-Up Tier under footnote 2 of the Fee Schedule, effective July 1,
2021.
    The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the
Exchange is only one of 16 registered equities exchanges, as well as a
number of alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues
that do not have similar self-regulatory responsibilities under the
Exchange Act, to which market participants may direct their order flow.
Based on publicly available information, no single registered equities
exchange has more than 16% of the market share.\3\ Thus, in such a low-
concentrated and highly competitive market, no single equities exchange
possesses significant pricing power in the execution of order flow. The
Exchange in particular operates a ``Taker-Maker'' model whereby it pays
credits to members that remove liquidity and assesses fees to those
that add liquidity. The Exchange's Fee Schedule sets forth the standard
rebates and rates applied per share for orders that remove and provide
liquidity, respectively. Particularly, for securities at or above
$1.00, the Exchange provides a standard rebate of $0.00020 per share
for orders that remove liquidity and assesses a fee of $0.00200 per
share for orders that add liquidity. For orders priced below $1.00, the
Exchange does not assess a fee or provide a rebate for orders that add
liquidity and assesses a fee of 0.10% of total dollar value for orders
that remove liquidity. The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting
market share among the exchanges from month to month demonstrates that
market participants can shift order flow or discontinue to reduce use
of certain categories of products, in response to fee changes.
Accordingly, competitive forces constrain the Exchange's transaction
fees, and market participants can readily trade on competing venues if
they deem pricing levels at those other venues to be more favorable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, Month-to-Date (June 29, 2021), available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_statistics/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, in response to the competitive environment, the
Exchange also offers tiered pricing which provides Members
opportunities to qualify for higher rebates or reduced fees where
certain volume criteria and thresholds are met. Tiered pricing provides
an incremental incentive for Members to strive for higher tier levels,
which provides increasingly higher benefits or discounts for satisfying
increasingly more stringent criteria. For example, the Exchange
currently offers various Add/Remove Volume Tiers under footnote 1 of
the Fee Schedule, which offer various enhanced rebates and reduced fees
for reaching certain, incrementally more challenging volume-based
thresholds.
    The Exchange now proposes to adopt a new Step-Up Tier under
footnote 2 of the Fee Schedule, which offers a reduced fee to Members
that increase their relative add volume order flow each month over a
predetermined baseline as well as add liquidity over an established
threshold. Specifically, the new Step-Up Tier provides Members an
opportunity to qualify for a reduced fee of $0.0014 on their qualifying
orders that yield B, V, and Y,\4\ where a Member 1) adds a Step-Up ADAV
\5\ from June 2021 greater than or equal to 0.05% of TCV \6\ or adds a
Step-Up ADAV from June 2021 greater than or equal to 2,000,000, and 2)
has a total add ADAV greater than or equal to 0.25% of TCV. The
proposed Step-Up Tier is designed to encourage Members that provide
displayed liquidity on the Exchange to increase their overall add
volume order flow, which would benefit all Members by providing greater
execution opportunities on the Exchange and to contribute to a deeper,
more liquid market, to the benefit of all investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Orders yielding Fee Code B are displayed orders that add
liquidity to BYX (Tape B), Orders yielding Fee Code V are displayed
orders that add liquidity to BYX (Tape A), and orders yielding Fee
Code Y are displayed orders that add liquidity to BYX (Tape C). Each
is assessed a standard fee of $0.00200.
    \5\ ``ADAV'' means average daily volume calculated as the number
of shares added per day and is calculated on a monthly basis.
``Step-Up ADAV'' means ADAV in the relevant baseline month
subtracted from current ADAV.
    \6\ ``TCV'' means total consolidated volume calculated as the
volume reported by all exchanges and trade reporting facilities to a
consolidated transaction reporting plan for the month for which the
fees apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\7\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\8\ in particular, as it is
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among its Members and issuers and other persons
using its facilities. The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \9\
requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest, and, particularly, is not
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As described above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. The proposed rule changes
reflect a competitive pricing structure designed to incentivize market
participants to direct their order flow to the Exchange, which the
Exchange believes would enhance market quality to the benefit of all
Members. Also, as described above, the Exchange notes that relative
volume-based incentives and discounts have been widely adopted by
exchanges,\10\ including the Exchange,\11\ and are reasonable,
equitable and non-discriminatory because they are open to all members
on an equal basis and provide additional benefits or discounts that are
reasonably related to (i) the value to an exchange's market quality and
(ii) associated higher levels of market activity, such as higher levels
of liquidity provision and/or growth patterns. Competing equity
exchanges offer similar tiered pricing structures, including schedules
of rebates and fees that apply based upon members achieving certain
volume and/or growth thresholds, as well as assess similar fees or
rebates for similar types of orders, to that of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See generally NYSE Price List, Transaction Fees; Nasdaq
Equity 7, Section 118(a)(1), Fees for Execution and Routing of
Orders in Nasdaq-Listed Securities; and BZX Equities Fee Schedule,
Footnote 2, Step-Up Tiers.
    \11\ See BYX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 1, Add/Remove
Volume Tiers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes the proposed Step-Up Tier is a

reasonable means to encourage Members to increase their relative add
liquidity on the Exchange each month over a predetermined baseline as
well as over a set threshold by offering Members an additional
opportunity to meet criteria to receive a reduced fee. More
specifically, the Exchange notes that greater add volume order flow may
provide for deeper, more liquid markets and execution opportunities at
improved prices, which the Exchange believes signals an increase in
activity from other market participants. This overall increase in
activity deepens the Exchange's liquidity pool, offers additional cost
savings, supports the quality of price discovery, promotes market
transparency and improves market quality, for all investors.
    Further, the Exchange believes that the proposed Step-Up Tier is
reasonable as it does not represent a significant departure from the
criteria or corresponding rates currently offered under in the Fee
Schedule, and that the proposed reduced fee is commensurate with the
new criteria. For example, Remove Volume Tier 7 under footnote 1 of the
Fee Schedule provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0016 per share for
qualifying orders, where a Member increases certain order flow on the
Exchange each month over a predetermined baseline as well as over a set
threshold. The Exchange notes that this enhanced rebate ($0.0016) over
the standard rebate ($0.00020) is essentially equivalent to the
proposed $0.0014 reduced fee offer in the new Step-Up Tier.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change represents
an equitable allocation of fees and rebates and is not unfairly
discriminatory because all Members are eligible for the new Step-Up
Tier and have the opportunity to meet the tier's criteria and receive
the proposed reduced fee if such criteria is met. Without having a view
of activity on other markets and off-exchange venues, the Exchange has
no way of knowing whether this proposed rule change would definitely
result in any Members qualifying for the proposed tier. While the
Exchange has no way of predicting with certainty how the proposed tier
will impact Member activity, the Exchange anticipates that at least
three Members will be able to satisfy the criteria proposed under the
new tier. The Exchange also notes that the proposed tier will not
adversely impact any Member's ability to qualify for reduced fees or
enhanced rebate offered under other tiers. Should a Member not meet the
proposed new criteria, the Member will merely not receive the
corresponding proposed reduced fee.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as discussed above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed change would encourage the
submission of additional order flow to a public exchange, thereby
promoting market depth, execution incentives and enhanced execution
opportunities, as well as price discovery and transparency for all
Members. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed change
furthers the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering
competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of
individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.''
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change does not impose any
burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, the proposed
new Step-Up Tier applies to all Members equally in that all Members are
eligible for these tiers, have a reasonable opportunity to meet the
tiers' criteria and will receive the reduced fee on their qualifying
orders if such criteria is met. The Exchange does not believe the
proposed change to adopt a new Step-Up Tier burdens competition, but
rather, enhances competition as it is intended to increase the
competitiveness of BYX by adopting an additional pricing incentive in
order to attract order flow and incentivize participants to increase
their participation on the Exchange, providing for additional execution
opportunities for market participants and improved price transparency.
Greater overall order flow, trading opportunities, and pricing
transparency benefits all market participants on the Exchange by
enhancing market quality and continuing to encourage Members to send
orders, thereby contributing towards a robust and well-balanced market
ecosystem.
    Next, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change does not
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. In
such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider
adjusting, its fees and rebates to remain competitive with other
exchanges. Members have numerous alternative venues that they may
participate on and direct their order flow, including other equities
exchanges, off-exchange venues, and alternative trading systems.
Additionally, the Exchange represents a small percentage of the overall
market. Based on publicly available information, no single equities
exchange has more than 15% of the market share.\12\ Therefore, no
exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of order
flow. Indeed, participants can readily choose to send their orders to
other exchange and off-exchange venues if they deem fee levels at those
other venues to be more favorable. Moreover, the Commission has
repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices, products, and services in the
securities markets. Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and
SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the
market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting market
competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors
and listed companies.'' \13\ The fact that this market is competitive
has also long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v.
Securities and Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows:
``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . .
As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and
sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-
routing agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders
for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly,
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker
dealers'. . . .''.\14\ Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its
proposed fee changes imposes any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See supra note 3.
    \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
    \14\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \15\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \16\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CboeBYX-2021-016 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeBYX-2021-016. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeBYX-2021-016 and should be submitted
on or before August 10, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-15342 Filed 7-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 84 (Thursday, April 30, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23921-23922]
[FR Doc No: 2020-08417]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 64

[Docket ID FEMA-2020-0005; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-8627]

Suspension of Community Eligibility

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule identifies communities where the sale of flood
insurance has been authorized under the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) that are scheduled for suspension on the effective dates
listed within this rule because of noncompliance with the floodplain
management requirements of the program. If the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) receives documentation that the community has
adopted the required floodplain management measures prior to the
effective suspension date given in this rule, the suspension will not
occur and a notice of this will be provided by publication in the
Federal Register on a subsequent date. Also, information identifying
the current participation status of a community can be obtained from
FEMA's Community Status Book (CSB). The CSB is available at https://www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program-community-status-book.

DATES: The effective date of each community's scheduled suspension is
the third date (``Susp.'') listed in the third column of the following
tables.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you want to determine whether a
particular community was suspended on the suspension date or for
further information, contact Adrienne L. Sheldon, PE, CFM, Federal
Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP enables property owners to purchase
Federal flood insurance that is not otherwise generally available from
private insurers. In return, communities agree to adopt and administer
local floodplain management measures aimed at protecting lives and new
construction from future flooding. Section 1315 of the National Flood
Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022, prohibits the sale
of NFIP flood insurance unless an appropriate public body adopts
adequate floodplain management measures with effective enforcement
measures. The communities listed in this document no longer meet that
statutory requirement for compliance with program regulations, 44 CFR
part 59. Accordingly, the communities will be suspended on the
effective date in the third column. As of that date, flood insurance
will no longer be available in the community. We recognize that some of
these communities may adopt and submit the required documentation of
legally enforceable floodplain management measures after this rule is
published but prior to the actual suspension date. These communities
will not be suspended and will continue to be eligible for the sale of
NFIP flood insurance. A notice withdrawing the suspension of such
communities will be published in the Federal Register.
    In addition, FEMA publishes a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that
identifies the Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) in these communities.
The date of the FIRM, if one has been published, is indicated in the
fourth column of the table. No direct Federal financial assistance
(except assistance pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act not in connection with a flood) may be
provided for construction or acquisition of buildings in identified
SFHAs for communities not participating in the NFIP and identified for
more than a year on FEMA's initial FIRM for the community as having
flood-prone areas (section 202(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act
of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4106(a), as amended). This prohibition against
certain types of Federal assistance becomes effective for the
communities listed on the date shown in the last column. The
Administrator finds that notice and public comment procedures under 5
U.S.C. 553(b), are impracticable and unnecessary because communities
listed in this final rule have been adequately notified.
    Each community receives 6-month, 90-day, and 30-day notification
letters addressed to the Chief Executive Officer stating that the
community will be suspended unless the required floodplain management
measures are met prior to the effective suspension date. Since these
notifications were made, this final rule may take effect within less
than 30 days.
    National Environmental Policy Act. FEMA has determined that the
community suspension(s) included in this rule is a non-discretionary
action and therefore the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) does not apply.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. The Administrator has determined that
this rule is exempt from the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act because the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended,
Section 1315, 42 U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance coverage unless
an appropriate public body adopts adequate floodplain management
measures with effective enforcement measures. The communities listed no
longer comply with the statutory requirements, and after the effective
date, flood insurance will no longer be available in the communities
unless remedial action takes place.
    Regulatory Classification. This final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 of September 30, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735.
    Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This rule involves no policies
that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
    Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule meets the
applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.
    Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule does not involve any collection
of information for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64

    Flood insurance, Floodplains.
    Accordingly, 44 CFR part 64 is amended as follows:

PART 64--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 64 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp.; p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp.; p. 376.

Sec.  64.6  [Amended]

0
2. The tables published under the authority of Sec.  64.6 are amended
as follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Effective date
                                                           authorization/
    State and location Region VII        Community    cancellation of sale of        Current effective map date       Date certain Federal assistance no
                                            No.          flood insurance in                                               longer available in SFHAs
                                                             community
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri:
    Nevada, City of, Vernon County...        290442  June 11, 1974, Emerg;      May 1, 2020........................  May 1, 2020.
                                                      February 15, 1985, Reg;
                                                     May 1, 2020, Susp.
Nebraska:
    Beaver Crossing, Village of,             310208  June 1, 1976, Emerg;       ......do *.........................   Do.
     Seward County.                                   August 19, 1987, Reg;
                                                     May 1, 2020, Susp.
    Seward, City of, Seward County...        310210  September 20, 1974,        ......do...........................   Do.
                                                      Emerg; September 30,
                                                      1980, Reg;
                                                     May 1, 2020, Susp.
    Seward County, Unincorporated            310474  October 4, 1989, Emerg;    ......do...........................   Do.
     Areas..                                          September 1, 1990, Reg;
                                                     May 1, 2020, Susp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*-do- =Ditto.
Code for reading third column: Emerg. --Emergency; Reg. --Regular; Susp. --Suspension.

Katherine B. Fox,
Assistant Administrator for Mitigation, Federal Insurance and
Mitigation Administration--FEMA Resilience, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-08417 Filed 4-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7871-7873]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02743]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0109; Airspace Docket No. 19-ASO-2]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of the Class D and Class E Airspace, Establishment of
Class E Airspace, and Revocation of Class E Airspace; Louisville, KY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action modifies the Class D airspace and Class E surface
airspace at Bowman Field, Louisville, KY; establishes Class E surface
airspace designated as an extension to a Class C surface area at
Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport, Louisville, KY; revokes
the Class E airspace designated as an extension to a Class D or Class E
surface area at Bowman Field Airport; and modifies the Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Louisville Muhammad
Ali International Airport and Bowman Field Airport. This action is due
to an airspace review caused by the decommissioning of the Bowman VHF
omnidirectional range (VOR), which provided navigation information to
the instrument procedures at this airport, as part of the VOR Minimum
Operational Network (MON) Program. The name of the Louisville Muhammad
Ali International Airport is also being updated to coincide with the
FAA's aeronautical database.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, May 21, 2020. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under Title 1
Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11D at NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it modifies the Class D airspace and Class E surface airspace at
Bowman Field, Louisville, KY; establishes Class E surface airspace
designated as an extension to a Class C surface area at Louisville
Muhammad Ali International Airport, Louisville, KY; revokes the Class E
airspace designated as an extension to a Class D or Class E surface
area at Bowman Field Airport; and modifies the Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Louisville Muhammad
Ali International Airport and Bowman Field Airport to support
instrument flight rule operations at these airports.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (84 FR 35044; July 22, 2019) for Docket No. FAA-2019-0109 to
amend the Class D airspace and Class E surface airspace at Bowman
Field, Louisville, KY; establish Class E surface airspace designated as
an extension to a Class C surface area at Louisville Muhammad Ali
International Airport, Louisville, KY; revoke the Class E airspace
designated as an extension to a Class D or Class E surface area at
Bowman Field Airport; and amend Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at Louisville Muhammad Ali International
Airport and Bowman Field Airport. Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on
the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received.
    Subsequent to publication, the FAA discovered an error in the
proposed amendment of the Class E airspace extending upward form 700
feet above the surface at Louisville Muhammad Ali International
Airport, Louisville, KY. The extension ``. . . and within 2.4 miles
each side of the ILS localizer east course, extending from the 10-mile
radius to 7 miles east of the LOM . . .'' should have been removed in
the proposed action and from the airspace legal description as it is no
longer needed. Those errors are corrected in this action.
    Class D and E airspace designations are published in paragraph
5000, 6002, 6003, 6004, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.11D,
dated August 8, 2019, and effective September 15, 2019, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and effective September 15,
2019. FAA Order 7400.11D is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11D lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by:
    Amending the Class D airspace to within a 4-mile radius (increased
from a 3.9-mile radius) of Bowman Field Airport, Louisville, KY; and
updating the name of the Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport
(previously Louisville International Airport), Louisville, KY, to
coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database;
    Amending the Class E surface airspace to within a 4-mile radius
(increased from a 3.9-mile radius) of Bowman Field Airport to 2,200
feet MSL; adding an exclusion area above 2,200 MSL; and updating the
name of the Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport (previously
Louisville International Airport) to coincide with the FAA's
aeronautical database;
    Establishing Class E surface airspace designated as an extension to
a Class C surface area at Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport
extending within 1 mile each side of the 165[deg] bearing of the
Louisville Muhammad Ali International: RWY 35R-LOC extending from the
5-mile radius of Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport to 5.5
miles south of the Louisville Muhammad Ali International: RWY 35R-LOC;
and within 1 mile each side of the 165[deg] bearing of the Louisville
Muhammad Ali International: RWY 35L-LOC extending from the 5-mile
radius of Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport to 5.5 miles
south of the Louisville Muhammad Ali International: RWY 35L-LOC; and
within 1 mile each side of the 165[deg] bearing of the Louisville
Muhammad Ali International Airport extending from the 5-mile radius of
Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport to 5.5 miles south of the
Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport;
    Removing the Class E airspace designated as an extension to Class D
and Class E surface area at Bowman Field Airport, as it is no longer
required;
    And amending the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface to within a 7.5-mile radius (decreased from a 10-mile
radius) of Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport; removing the
extension to the east of the LOM as it is no longer needed; within a
6.5-mile radius (decreased from a 10-mile radius) of Bowman Field
Airport; and updating the name of Louisville Muhammad Ali International
Airport to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database.
    This action is the result of an airspace review caused by the
decommissioning of the Bowman VOR, which provided navigation
information for the instrument procedures at these airports, as part of
the VOR MON Program.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is

published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected
to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and
effective September 15, 2019, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ASO KY D Louisville, KY [Amended]

Bowman Field Airport, KY
    (Lat. 38[deg]13'41'' N, long. 85[deg]39'49'' W)
Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport, KY
    (Lat. 38[deg]10'27'' N, long. 85[deg]44'11'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to but not
including 2,200 feet MSL within a 4-mile radius of Bowman Field
Airport, excluding that portion within the Louisville Muhammad Ali
International Airport Class C airspace area, and excluding that
portion south of the 081[deg] bearing from Louisville Muhammad Ali
International Airport, and also excluding that portion north of the
Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport Class C airspace area
and west of a line drawn from lat. 38[deg]11'28'' N, long.
85[deg]42'01'' W direct thru the point where the 030[deg] bearing
from Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport intersects the 5-
mile radius from Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport to
the point of intersection with the 4-mile radius from Bowman Field
Airport. This Class D airspace area is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The
effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in
the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as a Surface Area.

* * * * *

ASO KY E2 Louisville, KY [Amended]

Bowman Field Airport, KY
    (Lat. 38[deg]13'41'' N, long. 85[deg]39'49'' W)
Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport, KY
    (Lat. 38[deg]10'27'' N, long. 85[deg]44'11'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to but not
including 2,200 feet MSL within a 4-mile radius of Bowman Field
Airport, excluding that portion within the Louisville Muhammad Ali
International Airport Class C airspace area, and excluding that
portion south of the 081[deg] bearing from Louisville Muhammad Ali
International Airport, and also excluding that portion north of the
Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport Class C airspace area
and west of a line drawn from lat. 38[deg]11'28'' N, long.
85[deg]42'01'' W direct thru the point where the 030[deg] bearing
from Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport intersects the 5-
mile radius from Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport to
the point of intersection with the 4-mile radius from Bowman Field
Airport. This Class E airspace area is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The
effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in
the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6003 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to
a Class C Surface Area.

* * * * *

ASO KY E3 Louisville, KY [Established]

Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport, KY
    (Lat. 38[deg]10'27'' N, long. 85[deg]44'11'' W)
Louisville Muhammad Ali International: RWY 35R-LOC
    (Lat. 38[deg]11'21'' N, long. 85[deg]43'55'' W)
Louisville Muhammad Ali International: RWY 35L-LOC
    (Lat. 38[deg]11'17'' N, long. 85[deg]44'57'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 1 mile
each side of the 165[deg] bearing from the Louisville Muhammad Ali
International: RWY 35R-LOC extending from the 5-mile radius of the
Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport to 5.5 miles south of
the Louisville Muhammad Ali International: RWY 35R-LOC, and within 1
mile each side of the 165[deg] bearing from the Louisville Muhammad
Ali International: RWY 35L-LOC extending from the 5-mile radius of
the Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport to 5.5 miles south
of the Louisville Muhammad Ali International: RWY 35L-LOC, and
within 1 mile each side of the 165[deg] bearing from the Louisville
Muhammad Ali International Airport extending from the 5-mile radius
of the Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport to 5.5 miles
south of the Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to
a Class D or Class E Surface Area.

* * * * *

ASO KY E4 Louisville Bowman Field, KY [Removed]

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO KY E5 Louisville, KY [Amended]

Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport, KY
    (Lat. 38[deg]10'27'' N, long. 85[deg]44'11'' W)
Bowman Field Airport, KY
    (Lat. 38[deg]13'41'' N, long. 85[deg]39'49'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7.5-mile radius of Louisville Muhammad Ali International
Airport, and within a 6.5-mile radius of Bowman Field Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on February 5, 2020.
Marty Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2020-02743 Filed 2-11-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


P-19-0170 Sanitized Support Documents Index:
 P-19-0170 Sanitized Determination Document (linked)
 P-19-0170 Sanitized CHEM Report (attached)
 P-19-0170 Sanitized ECO Report (attached)
 P-19-0170 Sanitized ENG Report (attached)
 P-19-0170 Sanitized EXP Report (attached)
 P-19-0170 Sanitized Fate Report (attached)
 P-19-0170 Sanitized HLTH Report_POST-FOCUS FINAL (attached)