period following the procedures described in the particular method.
Note: Caution! Heater or non-approved electrical probes should not
be used around explosive or flammable sources.
* * * * *
    16.0 * * *
    5. Letter to RAMCON Environmental Corp. from Robert Kellam,
December 27, 1992.
* * * * *

Performance Specification 11-- Specifications and Test Procedures for
Particulate Matter Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at Stationary
Sources

* * * * *
    12.1 * * *
    (1) Calculate the upscale drift (UD) using Equation 11-1:
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.017

Where:

UD = The upscale (high-level) drift of your PM CEMS in percent,
RCEM = The measured PM CEMS response to the upscale
reference standard, and
RU = The pre-established numerical value of the upscale
reference standard.
FS= Full-scale value.
(2) Calculate the zero drift (ZD) using Equation 11-2:

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.018

Where:

ZD = The zero (low-level) drift of your PM CEMS in percent,
RCEM = The measured PM CEMS response to the zero
reference standard,
RL = The pre-established numerical value of the zero
reference standard, and
FS = Full-scale value.
* * * * *

Performance Specification 12B--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Monitoring Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emissions from Stationary Sources
Using a Sorbent Trap Monitoring System

* * * * *
    9.0 * * *

                         Table 12B-1--QA/QC Criteria for Sorbent Trap Monitoring Systems
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     QA/QC test or  specification        Acceptance criteria           Frequency         Consequences if not met
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-test leak check..................  <=4% of target sampling  Prior to monitoring....  Monitoring must not
                                        rate.                                             commence until the
                                                                                leak check is passed.
Post-test leak check.................  <=4% of average          After monitoring.......  Invalidate the data
                                        sampling rate.                                    from the paired traps
                                                                                or, if certain
                                                                                conditions are met,
                                                                                report adjusted data
                                                                                from a single trap
                                                                                (see Section 12.8.3).
Ratio of stack gas flow rate to        No more than 5% of the   Every hour throughout    Invalidate the data
 sample flow rate.                      hourly ratios or 5       monitoring period.       from the paired traps
                                        hourly ratios                                     or, if certain
                                        (whichever is less                                conditions are met,
                                        restrictive) may                                  report adjusted data
                                        deviate from the                                  from a single trap
                                        reference ratio by                                (see Section 12.8.3).
                                        more than 25%.
Sorbent trap section 2 breakthrough..  <=5% of Section 1 Hg     Every sample...........  Invalidate the data
                                        mass.                                             from the paired traps
                                       <=10% of Section 1 Hg                              or, if certain
                                        mass if average Hg                                conditions are met,
                                        concentration is <=0.5                            report adjusted data
                                        [micro]g/scm.                                     from a single trap
                                                                                (see Section 12.8.3).
                                       No criterion when Hg
                                        concentration for trap
                                        less than 10% of the
                                        applicable emission
                                        limit (must meet all
                                        other QA/QC
                                        specifications).
Paired sorbent trap agreement........  <=10% Relative           Every sample...........  Either invalidate the
                                        Deviation (RD) if the                             data from the paired
                                        average concentration                             traps or report the
                                        is > 1.0 [micro]g/m\3\.                           results from the trap
                                       <=20% RD if the average                            with the higher Hg
                                        concentration is <=1.0                            concentration.
                                        [micro]g/m\3\.
                                       Results also acceptable
                                        if absolute difference
                                        between concentrations
                                        from paired traps is
                                        <= 0.03 [micro]g/m\3\.
Spike Recovery Study.................  Average recovery         Prior to analyzing       Field samples must not
                                        between 85% and 115%     field samples and        be analyzed until the
                                        for each of the 3        prior to use of new      percent recovery
                                        spike concentration      sorbent media.           criteria have been
                                        levels.                                           met.
Multipoint analyzer calibration......  Each analyzer reading    On the day of analysis,  Recalibrate until
                                        within       before analyzing any     successful.
                                        10% of true value and    samples.
                                        r\2\ >= 0.99.
Analysis of independent calibration    Within  10%  Following daily          Recalibrate and repeat
 standard.                              of true value.           calibration, prior to    independent standard
                                                                 analyzing field          analysis until
                                                                 samples.                 successful.
Spike recovery from section 3 of both  75-125% of spike amount  Every sample...........  Invalidate the data
 sorbent traps.                                                                           from the paired traps
                                                                                or, if certain
                                                                                conditions are met,
                                                                                report adjusted data
                                                                                from a single trap
                                                                                (see Section 12.8.3).
Relative Accuracy....................  RA <= 20.0% of RM mean   RA specification must    Data from the system
                                        value; or if RM mean     be met for initial       are invalid until a RA
                                        value <=5.0 [micro]g/    certification.           test is passed.
                                        scm, absolute
                                        difference between RM
                                        and sorbent trap
                                        monitoring system mean
                                        values <=1.0 [micro]g/
                                        scm.

Gas flow meter calibration...........  An initial calibration   At 3 settings prior to   Recalibrate meter at 3
                                        factor (Y) has been      initial use and at       settings to determine
                                        determined at 3          least quarterly at one   a new value of Y.
                                        settings; for mass       setting thereafter.
                                        flow meters, initial
                                        calibration with stack
                                        gas has been
                                        performed. For
                                        subsequent
                                        calibrations, Y within
                                        5% of
                                        average value from the
                                        most recent 3-point
                                        calibration.
Temperature sensor calibration.......  Absolute temperature     Prior to initial use     Recalibrate; sensor may
                                        measured by sensor       and at least quarterly   not be used until
                                        within       thereafter.              specification is met.
                                        1.5% of a reference
                                        sensor.
Barometer calibration................  Absolute pressure        Prior to initial use     Recalibrate; instrument
                                        measured by instrument   and at least quarterly   may not be used until
                                        within  10   thereafter.              specification is met.
                                        mm Hg of reading with
                                        a NIST-traceable
                                        barometer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    12.8.3 For the routine, day-to-day operation of the monitoring
system, when one of the two sorbent trap samples or sampling systems
either: (a) Fails the post-monitoring leak check; or (b) has
excessive section 2 breakthrough; or (c) fails to maintain the
proper stack flow-to-sample flow ratio; or (d) fails to achieve the
required section 3 spike recovery; or (e) is lost, broken, or
damaged, provided that the other trap meets the acceptance criteria
for all four of these QC specifications, the Hg concentration
measured by the valid trap may be multiplied by a factor of 1.111
and then used for reporting purposes. Further, if both traps meet
the acceptance criteria for all four of these QC specifications, but
the acceptance criterion for paired trap agreement is not met, the
owner or operator may report the higher of the two Hg concentrations
measured by the traps, in lieu of invalidating the data from the
paired traps.
* * * * *

Performance Specification 15--Performance Specification for Extractive
FTIR Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources

* * * * *
    <IP_ADDRESS>.2 RMs Using a Grab Sampling Technique. Synchronize the
RM and FTIR CEM measurements as closely as possible. For a grab
sampling RM, record the volume collected and the exact sampling
period for each sample. Synchronize the FTIR CEM so that the FTIR
measures a spectrum of a similar cell volume at the same time as the
RM grab sample was collected. Measure at least five independent
samples with both the FTIR CEM and the RM for each of the minimum
nine runs. Compare the run concentration averages by using the
relative accuracy analysis procedure in Performance Specification 2
of appendix B of 40 CFR part 60.
    <IP_ADDRESS>.3 Continuous Emission Monitors as RMs. If the RM is a
CEM, synchronize the sampling flow rates of the RM and the FTIR CEM.
Each run is at least 1 hour long and consists of at least 10 FTIR
CEM measurements and the corresponding 10 RM measurements (or
averages). For the statistical comparison, use the relative accuracy
analysis procedure in Performance Specification 2 of appendix B of
40 CFR part 60. If the RM time constant is < \1/2\ the FTIR CEM time
constant, brief fluctuations in analyte concentrations that are not
adequately measured with the slower FTIR CEM time constant can be
excluded from the run average along with the corresponding RM
measurements. However, the FTIR CEM run average must still include
at least 10 measurements over a 1-hour period.
* * * * *

Performance Specification 16--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Predictive Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources

* * * * *
    6.1.7 Sensor Location and Repair. We recommend you install
sensors in an accessible location in order to perform repairs and
replacements. Permanently-installed platforms or ladders may not be
needed. If you install sensors in an area that is not accessible,
you may be required to shut down the emissions unit to repair or
replace a sensor. Conduct a new RATA after replacing a sensor that
supplies a critical PEMS parameter if the new sensor provides a
different output or scaling or changes the historical training
dataset of the PEMS. Replacement of a non-critical sensor that does
not cause an impact in the accuracy of the PEMS does not trigger a
RATA. All sensors must be calibrated as often as needed but at least
as often as recommended by the manufacturers.
* * * * *
    8.2.1 Reference Methods. Unless otherwise specified in the
applicable regulations, you must use the test methods in appendix A
of this part for the RM test. Conduct the RM tests at three
operating levels. The RM tests shall be performed at a low-load (or
production) level between the minimum safe, stable load and 50
percent of the maximum level load, at the mid-load level (an
intermediary level between the low and high levels), and at a high-
load level between 80 percent and the maximum load. Alternatively,
if practicable, you may test at three levels of the key operating
parameter (e.g. selected based on a covariance analysis between each
parameter and the PEMS output) equally spaced within the normal
range of the parameter.
* * * * *
    9.1 QA/QC Summary. Conduct the applicable ongoing tests listed
below.

                                         Ongoing Quality Assurance Tests
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           PEMS regulatory
                 Test                          purpose               Acceptability              Frequency
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sensor Evaluation....................  All....................  .......................  Daily.
RAA..................................  Compliance.............  3-test avg <=10% of      Each quarter except
                                                                 simultaneous analyzer    quarter when RATA
                                                                 or RM average.           performed.
RATA.................................  All....................  Same as for RA in Sec.   Yearly in quarter when
                                                                 13.1.                    RAA not performed.
Bias Correction......................  All....................  If davg <=               Bias test passed (no
                                                                 [bond]cc[bond].          correction factor
                                                                                needed).
PEMS Training........................  All....................  If Fcritical >=F.......  Optional after initial
                                                                r >=0.8................   and subsequent RATAs.

Sensor Evaluation Alert Test           All....................  See Section 6.1.8......  After each PEMS
 (optional).                                                                              training.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    9.3 Quarterly Relative Accuracy Audits. In the first year of
operation after the initial certification, perform a RAA consisting
of at least three 30-minute portable analyzer or RM determinations
each quarter a RATA is not performed. To conduct a RAA, follow the
procedures in Section 8.2 for the relative accuracy test, except
that only three sets of measurement data are required, and the
statistical tests are not required. The average of the three or more
portable analyzer or RM determinations must not exceed the limits
given in Section 13.5. Report the data from all sets of measurement
data. If a PEMS passes all quarterly RAAs in the first year and also
passes the subsequent yearly RATA in the second year, you may elect
to perform a single mid-year RAA in the second year in place of the
quarterly RAAs. This option may be repeated, but only until the PEMS
fails either a mid-year RAA or a yearly RATA. When such a failure
occurs, you must resume quarterly RAAs in the quarter following the
failure and continue conducting quarterly RAAs until the PEMS
successfully passes both a year of quarterly RAAs and a subsequent
RATA.
    9.4 Yearly Relative Accuracy Test. Perform a minimum 9-run RATA
at the normal operating level on a yearly basis in the quarter that
the RAA is not performed. The statistical tests in Section 8.3 are
not required for the yearly RATA.
* * * * *
    12.4 Relative Accuracy Audit. Calculate the quarterly RAA using
Equation 16-9.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.019

* * * * *
    13.5 Relative Accuracy Audits. The average of the three portable
analyzer or RM determinations must not differ from the simultaneous
PEMS average value by more than 10 percent of the analyzer or RM for
concentrations greater than 100 ppm or 20 percent for concentrations
between 100 and 20 ppm, or the test is failed. For measurements at
20 ppm or less, this difference must not exceed 2 ppm for a
pollutant PEMS and 1 percent absolute for a diluents PEMS.
* * * * *

0
31. Amend appendix F to Part 60 as follows:
0
a. By revising Procedure 1, section 6.2.
0
b. By revising Procedure 2, paragraphs (3) and (4) of section 12.0.
0
c. By redesignating the second listing of section 6.2.6 as section
6.2.7 in Procedure 5.

Appendix F to Part 60--Quality Assurance Procedures

* * * * *

Procedure 1--Quality Assurance Requirements for Gas Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems Used for Compliance Determination

* * * * *
    6.2 RAA Accuracy Calculation. Use the calculation procedure in
the relevant performance specification to calculate the accuracy for
the RAA. The RAA must be calculated in the units of the applicable
emission standard.
* * * * *

Procedure 2--Quality Assurance Requirements for Particulate Matter
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources

* * * * *

12.0 What calculations and data analysis must I perform for my PM
CEMS?

* * * * *
    (3) How do I calculate daily upscale and zero drift? You must
calculate the upscale drift using Equation 2-2 and the zero drift
using Equation 2-3:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.021

Where:

UD = The upscale drift of your PM CEMS, in percent,
RCEM = Your PM CEMS response to the upscale check value,
and
RU = The upscale check value.
FS = Full-scale value.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.022

Where:

ZD = The zero (low-level) drift of your PM CEMS, in percent,
RCEM = Your PM CEMS response of the zero check value,
RL = The zero check value.
    (4) How do I calculate SVA accuracy? You must use Equation 2-4
to calculate the accuracy, in percent, for each of the three SVA
tests or the daily sample volume check:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.023

Where:

VM = Sample gas volume determined/reported by your PM
CEMS (e.g., dscm),
VR = Sample gas volume measured by the independent
calibrated reference device (e.g., dscm) for the SVA or the
reference value for the daily sample volume check.

    Note: Before calculating SVA accuracy, you must correct the
sample gas volumes measured by your PM CEMS and the independent
calibrated reference device to the same basis of temperature,
pressure, and moisture content. You must document all data and
calculations.

* * * * *

PART 61--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS

0
32. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart A--[Amended]

0
33. Amend Sec.  61.13 by revising paragraph (e)(1)(i) to read as
follows:

Sec.  61.13  Emission tests and waiver of emission tests.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) The source owner, operator, or representative of the tested
facility shall obtain an audit sample, if commercially available, from
an AASP for each test method used for regulatory compliance purposes.
No audit samples are required for the following test methods: Methods
3A and 3C of appendix A-3 of part 60; Methods 6C, 7E, 9, and 10 of
appendix A-4 of part 60; Method 18 and 19 of appendix A-6 of part 60;
Methods 20, 22, and 25A of appendix A-7 of part 60; and Methods 303,
318, 320, and 321 of appendix A of part 63. If multiple sources at a
single facility are tested during a compliance test event, only one
audit sample is required for each method used during a compliance test.
The compliance authority responsible for the compliance test may waive
the requirement to include an audit sample if they believe that an
audit sample is not necessary. ``Commercially available'' means that
two or more independent AASPs have blind audit samples available for
purchase. If the source owner, operator, or representative cannot find
an audit sample for a specific method, the owner, operator, or
representative shall consult the EPA Web site at the following URL,
www.epa.gov/ttn/emc, to confirm whether there is a source that can
supply an audit sample for that method. If the EPA Web site does not
list an available audit sample at least 60 days prior to the beginning
of the compliance test, the source owner, operator, or representative
shall not be required to include an audit sample as part of the quality
assurance program for the compliance test. When ordering an audit
sample, the source owner, operator, or representative shall give the
sample provider an estimate for the concentration of each pollutant
that is emitted by the source or the estimated concentration of each
pollutant based on the permitted level and the name, address, and phone
number of the compliance authority. The source owner, operator, or
representative shall report the results for the audit sample along with
a summary of the emission test results for the audited pollutant to the
compliance authority and shall report the results of the audit sample
to the AASP. The source owner, operator, or representative shall make
both reports at the same time and in the same manner or shall report to
the compliance authority first and report to the AASP. If the method
being audited is a method that allows the samples to be analyzed in the
field and the tester plans to analyze the samples in the field, the
tester may analyze the audit samples prior to collecting the emission
samples provided a representative of the compliance authority is
present at the testing site. The tester may request, and the compliance
authority may grant, a waiver to the requirement that a representative
of the compliance authority must be present at the testing site during
the field analysis of an audit sample. The source owner, operator, or
representative may report the results of the audit sample to the
compliance authority and then report the results of the audit sample to
the AASP prior to collecting any emission samples. The test protocol
and final test report shall document whether an audit sample was
ordered and utilized and the pass/fail results as applicable.
* * * * *

Subpart C--[Amended]

0
34. Amend Sec.  61.33 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:

Sec.  61.33  Stack sampling.

    (a) Unless a waiver of emission testing is obtained under Sec.
61.13, each owner or operator required to comply with Sec.  61.32(a)
shall test emissions from the source according to Method 104 of
appendix B to this part or according to Method 29 of appendix A to part
60. Method 103 of appendix B to this part is approved by the
Administrator as an alternative method for sources subject to Sec.
61.32(a). The emission test shall be performed:
    (1) By May 28, 2014 in the case of an existing source or a new
source which has an initial startup date preceding February 27, 2014;
or
    (2) Within 90 days of startup in the case of a new source which did
not have an initial startup date preceding February 27, 2014.
* * * * *

Subpart D--[Amended]

0
35. Amend Sec.  61.42 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:

Sec.  61.42  Emission standard.

    (a) Emissions to the atmosphere from rocket-motor test sites shall
not cause time-weighted atmospheric concentrations of beryllium to
exceed 75 microgram minutes per cubic meter ([micro]g-min/m\3\)(4.68 x
10-9 pound minutes per cubic foot (lb-min/ft\3\)) of air
within the limits of 10 to 60 minutes, accumulated during any 2
consecutive weeks, in any area in which an adverse effect to public
health could occur.
* * * * *

Subpart E--[Amended]

0
36. Amend Sec.  61.53 by revising paragraph (d)(2) to read as follows:

Sec.  61.53  Stack sampling.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (2) Method 101A in appendix B or Method 29 in appendix A to part 60
shall be used to test emissions as follows:
    (i) The test shall be performed by May 28, 2014 in the case of an
existing source or a new source which has an initial startup date
preceding February 27, 2014.
    (ii) The test shall be performed within 90 days of startup in the
case of a new source which did not have an initial startup date
preceding February 27, 2014.
* * * * *

Subpart N--[Amended]

0
37. Amend Sec.  61.164 as follows:
0
a. By revising paragraph (d)(2)(i).
0
b. By revising paragraph (e)(1)(i).
0
c. By revising paragraph (e)(2) to read as follows:

Sec.  61.164  Test methods and procedures.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (i) Use Method 108 in appendix B to this part or Method 29 in
appendix A to part 60 for determining the arsenic

emission rate, g/hr (lb/hr). The emission rate shall equal the
arithmetic mean of the results of three 60-minute test runs.
* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) Use Method 108 in appendix B to this part or Method 29 in
appendix A to part 60 to determine the concentration of arsenic in the
gas streams entering and exiting the control device. Conduct three 60-
minute test runs, each consisting of simultaneous testing of the inlet
and outlet gas streams. The gas streams shall contain all the gas
exhausted from the glass melting furnace.
* * * * *
    (2) Calculate the percent emission reduction for each run as
follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.024

Where:

D = the percent emission reduction.
Cb = the arsenic concentration of the stack gas entering
the control device, as measured by Method 108 or Method 29.
Ca = the arsenic concentration of the stack gas exiting
the control device, as measured by Method 108 or Method 29.
* * * * *
0
38. Amend appendix B to part 61 to read as follows:
0
a. By amending Method 101 by redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as
sections 17.0 and 18.0, respectively, and by adding a new section 16.0.
0
b. By amending Method 101A by redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as
sections 17.0 and 18.0, respectively, and by adding a new section 16.0.
0
c. By revising Method 102, section <IP_ADDRESS>.
0
d. By amending Method 104 as follows:
0
i. By revising sections 4.1 and 11.5.3.
0
ii. By redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as sections 17.0 and 18.0,
respectively.
0
iii. By adding a new section 16.0.
0
e. By amending Method 108 by redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as
sections 17.0 and 18.0, respectively, and by adding a new section 16.0.
0
f. By amending Method 108A by redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as
sections 17.0 and 18.0 respectively, and by adding a new section 16.0.

Appendix B to Part 61--Test Methods

* * * * *

Method 101--Determination of Particulate and Gaseous Mercury Emissions
From Chlor-Alkali Plants (Air Streams)

* * * * *

16.0 Alternative Procedures

    16.1 Alternative Analyzer. Samples may also be analyzed by cold
vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry.
* * * * *

Method 101A--Determination of Particulate and Gaseous Mercury Emissions
From Sewage Sludge Incinerators

* * * * *

16.0 Alternative Procedures

    16.1 Alternative Analyzers.
    16.1.1 Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry
(ICP-AES) may be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis provided the following conditions are met:
    <IP_ADDRESS> Sample collection, sample preparation, and analytical
preparation procedures are as defined in the method except as
necessary for the ICP-AES application.
    <IP_ADDRESS> The quality control procedures are conducted as
prescribed.
    <IP_ADDRESS> The limit of quantitation for the ICP-AES must be
demonstrated and the sample concentrations reported should be no
less than two times the limit of quantitation. The limit of
quantitation is defined as ten times the standard deviation of the
blank value. The standard deviation of the blank value is determined
from the analysis of seven blanks. It has been reported that for
mercury and those elements that form hydrides, a continuous-flow
generator coupled to an ICP-AES offers detection limits comparable
to cold vapor atomic absorption.
    16.1.2 Samples may also be analyzed by cold vapor atomic
fluorescence spectrometry.
* * * * *

Method 102--Determination of Particulate and Gaseous Mercury Emissions
From Chlor-Alkali Plants (Hydrogen Streams)

* * * * *
    <IP_ADDRESS> Calibrate the meter box orifice. Use the techniques
described in APTD-0576 (see Reference 9 in Section 17.0 of Method 5
of appendix A to part 60). Calibration of the orifice meter at flow
conditions that simulate the conditions at the source is suggested.
Calibration should either be done with hydrogen or with some other
gas having a similar Reynolds Number so that there is similarity
between the Reynolds Numbers during calibration and during sampling.
Alternative mercury-free thermometers may be used if the
thermometers are, at a minimum, equivalent in terms of performance
or suitably effective for the specific temperature measurement
application.
* * * * *

Method 104--Determination of Beryllium Emissions From Stationary
Sources

* * * * *
    4.1 Matrix Effects. Analysis for Be by flame atomic absorption
spectrophotometry is sensitive to the chemical composition and to
the physical properties (e.g., viscosity, pH) of the sample.
Aluminum and silicon, in particular, are known to interfere when
present in appreciable quantities. The analytical procedure includes
(optionally) the use of the Method of Standard Additions to check
for these matrix effects, and sample analysis using the Method of
Standard Additions if significant matrix effects are found to be
present (see Reference 2 in Section 17.0).
* * * * *
    11.5.3 Check for Matrix Effects (optional). Use the Method of
Standard Additions (see Reference 2 in Section 17.0) to check at
least one sample from each source for matrix effects on the Be
results. If the results of the Method of Standard Additions
procedure used on the single source sample do not agree to within 5
percent of the value obtained by the routine atomic absorption
analysis, then reanalyze all samples from the source using the
Method of Standard Additions procedure.
* * * * *

16.0 Alternative Procedures

    16.1 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry
(ICP-AES) Analysis. ICP-AES may be used as an alternative to atomic
absorption analysis provided the following conditions are met:
    16.1.1 Sample collection, sample preparation, and analytical
preparation procedures are as defined in the method except as
necessary for the ICP-AES application.
    16.1.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures, including
audit material analysis, are conducted as prescribed in the method.
The QA acceptance conditions must be met.
    16.1.3 The limit of quantitation for the ICP-AES must be
demonstrated and the sample concentrations reported should be no
less than two times the limit of quantitation. The limit of
quantitation is defined as ten times the standard deviation of the
blank value. The standard deviation of the blank value is determined
from the analysis of seven blanks. It has been reported that for
mercury and those elements that form hydrides, a continuous-flow
generator coupled to an ICP-AES offers detection limits comparable
to cold vapor atomic absorption.
    16.2 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)
Analysis. ICP-MS may be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis.
    16.3 Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry (CVAFS)
Analysis. CVAFS may be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis.
* * * * *

Method 108--Determination of Particulate and Gaseous Arsenic Emissions

* * * * *

16.0 Alternative Procedures

    16.1 Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry
(ICP-AES) Analysis. ICP-AES may be used as an alternative to atomic
absorption analysis provided the following conditions are met:
    16.1.1 Sample collection, sample preparation, and analytical
preparation procedures are as defined in the method

except as necessary for the ICP-AES application.
    16.1.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures, including
audit material analysis, are conducted as prescribed in the method.
The QA acceptance conditions must be met.
    16.1.3 The limit of quantitation for the ICP-AES must be
demonstrated and the sample concentrations reported should be no
less than two times the limit of quantitation. The limit of
quantitation is defined as ten times the standard deviation of the
blank value. The standard deviation of the blank value is determined
from the analysis of seven blanks. It has been reported that for
mercury and those elements that form hydrides, a continuous-flow
generator coupled to an ICP-AES offers detection limits comparable
to cold vapor atomic absorption.
    16.2 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)
Analysis. ICP-MS may be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis.
    16.3 Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry (CVAFS)
Analysis. CVAFS may be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis.
* * * * *

Method 108A--Determination of Arsenic Content in Ore Samples From
Nonferrous Smelters

* * * * *

16.0 Alternative Procedures

    16.1 Alternative Analyzer. Inductively coupled plasma-atomic
emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) may be used as an alternative to
atomic absorption analysis provided the following conditions are
met:
    16.1.1 Sample collection, sample preparation, and analytical
preparation procedures are as defined in the method except as
necessary for the ICP-AES application.
    16.1.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures, including
audit material analysis, are conducted as prescribed in the method.
The QA acceptance conditions must be met.
    16.1.3 The limit of quantitation for the ICP-AES must be
demonstrated and the sample concentrations reported should be no
less than two times the limit of quantitation. The limit of
quantitation is defined as ten times the standard deviation of the
blank value. The standard deviation of the blank value is determined
from the analysis of seven blanks. It has been reported that for
mercury and those elements that form hydrides, a continuous-flow
generator coupled to an ICP-AES offers detection limits comparable
to cold vapor atomic absorption.
* * * * *

PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES

0
39. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart A--[Amended]

0
40. Amend Sec.  63.7 by revising paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(A) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.7  Performance testing requirements.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (iii) * * *
    (A) The source owner, operator, or representative of the tested
facility shall obtain an audit sample, if commercially available, from
an AASP for each test method used for regulatory compliance purposes.
No audit samples are required for the following test methods: Methods
3A and 3C of appendix A-3 of part 60; Methods 6C, 7E, 9, and 10 of
appendix A-4 of part 60; Methods 18 and 19 of appendix A-6 of part 60;
Methods 20, 22, and 25A of appendix A-7 of part 60; and Methods 303,
318, 320, and 321 of appendix A of part 63. If multiple sources at a
single facility are tested during a compliance test event, only one
audit sample is required for each method used during a compliance test.
The compliance authority responsible for the compliance test may waive
the requirement to include an audit sample if they believe that an
audit sample is not necessary. ``Commercially available'' means that
two or more independent AASPs have blind audit samples available for
purchase. If the source owner, operator, or representative cannot find
an audit sample for a specific method, the owner, operator, or
representative shall consult the EPA Web site at the following URL,
www.epa.gov/ttn/emc, to confirm whether there is a source that can
supply an audit sample for that method. If the EPA Web site does not
list an available audit sample at least 60 days prior to the beginning
of the compliance test, the source owner, operator, or representative
shall not be required to include an audit sample as part of the quality
assurance program for the compliance test. When ordering an audit
sample, the source owner, operator, or representative shall give the
sample provider an estimate for the concentration of each pollutant
that is emitted by the source or the estimated concentration of each
pollutant based on the permitted level and the name, address, and phone
number of the compliance authority. The source owner, operator, or
representative shall report the results for the audit sample along with
a summary of the emission test results for the audited pollutant to the
compliance authority and shall report the results of the audit sample
to the AASP. The source owner, operator, or representative shall make
both reports at the same time and in the same manner or shall report to
the compliance authority first and report to the AASP. If the method
being audited is a method that allows the samples to be analyzed in the
field and the tester plans to analyze the samples in the field, the
tester may analyze the audit samples prior to collecting the emission
samples provided a representative of the compliance authority is
present at the testing site. The tester may request, and the compliance
authority may grant, a waiver to the requirement that a representative
of the compliance authority must be present at the testing site during
the field analysis of an audit sample. The source owner, operator, or
representative may report the results of the audit sample to the
compliance authority and then report the results of the audit sample to
the AASP prior to collecting any emission samples. The test protocol
and final test report shall document whether an audit sample was
ordered and utilized and the pass/fail results as applicable.
* * * * *

0
41. Amend Sec.  63.8 by adding a sentence to the end of paragraph
(f)(6)(iii) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.8  Monitoring requirements.

* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (6) * * *
    (iii) * * * The Administrator will review the notification and may
rescind permission to use an alternative and require the owner or
operator to conduct a relative accuracy test of the CEMS as specified
in section 8.4 of Performance Specification 2.
* * * * *

0
42. Revise Sec.  63.14 to read as follows:

Sec.  63.14  Incorporations by reference.

    (a) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part
with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that
specified in this section, the EPA must publish notice of change in the
Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All
approved material is available for inspection at the Air and Radiation
Docket and Information Center, U.S. EPA, 401 M St. SW., Washington, DC,
telephone number 202-566, and is available from the sources listed
below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For

information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030 or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    (b) The Association of Florida Phosphate Chemists, P.O. Box 1645,
Bartow, Florida 33830.
    (1) Book of Methods Used and Adopted By The Association of Florida
Phosphate Chemists, Seventh Edition 1991:
    (i) Section IX, Methods of Analysis for Phosphate Rock, No. 1
Preparation of Sample, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.606(c) and
63.626(c).
    (ii) Section IX, Methods of Analysis for Phosphate Rock, No. 3
Phosphorus--P2O5 or
Ca3(PO4)2, Method A--Volumetric
Method, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.606(c) and 63.626(c).
    (iii) Section IX, Methods of Analysis for Phosphate Rock, No. 3
Phosphorus-P2O5 or
Ca3(PO4)2, Method B--Gravimetric
Quimociac Method, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.606(c) and 63.626(c).
    (iv) Section IX, Methods of Analysis For Phosphate Rock, No. 3
Phosphorus--P2O5 or
Ca3(PO4)2, Method C--
Spectrophotometric Method, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.606(c) and
63.626(c).
    (v) Section XI, Methods of Analysis for Phosphoric Acid,
Superphosphate, Triple Superphosphate, and Ammonium Phosphates, No. 3
Total Phosphorus--P2O5, Method A--Volumetric
Method, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.606(c) and 63.626(c) and (d).
    (vi) Section XI, Methods of Analysis for Phosphoric Acid,
Superphosphate, Triple Superphosphate, and Ammonium Phosphates, No. 3
Total Phosphorus--P2O5, Method B--Gravimetric
Quimociac Method, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.606(c) and 63.626(c)
and (d).
    (vii) Section XI, Methods of Analysis for Phosphoric Acid,
Superphosphate, Triple Superphosphate, and Ammonium Phosphates, No. 3
Total Phosphorus--P2O5, Method C--
Spectrophotometric Method, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.606(c) and
63.626(c) and (d).
    (2) [Reserved]
    (c) Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC)
International, Customer Services, Suite 400, 2200 Wilson Boulevard,
Arlington, Virginia 22201-3301, Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, Fax (703)
522-5468.
    (1) AOAC Official Method 929.01 Sampling of Solid Fertilizers,
Sixteenth edition, 1995, IBR approved for Sec.  63.626(d).
    (2) AOAC Official Method 929.02 Preparation of Fertilizer Sample,
Sixteenth edition, 1995, IBR approved for Sec.  63.626(d).
    (3) AOAC Official Method 957.02 Phosphorus (Total) in Fertilizers,
Preparation of Sample Solution, Sixteenth edition, 1995, IBR approved
for Sec.  63.626(d).
    (4) AOAC Official Method 958.01 Phosphorus (Total) in Fertilizers,
Spectrophotometric Molybdovanadophosphate Method, Sixteenth edition,
1995, IBR approved for Sec.  63.626(d).
    (5) AOAC Official Method 962.02 Phosphorus (Total) in Fertilizers,
Gravimetric Quinolinium Molybdophosphate Method, Sixteenth edition,
1995, IBR approved for Sec.  63.626(d).
    (6) AOAC Official Method 969.02 Phosphorus (Total) in Fertilizers,
Alkalimetric Quinolinium Molybdophosphate Method, Sixteenth edition,
1995, IBR approved for Sec.  63.626(d).
    (7) AOAC Official Method 978.01 Phosphorus (Total) in Fertilizers,
Automated Method, Sixteenth edition, 1995, IBR approved for Sec.
63.626(d).
    (d) American Petroleum Institute (API), 1220 L Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20005.
    (1) API Publication 2517, Evaporative Loss from External Floating-
Roof Tanks, Third Edition, February 1989, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.111 and 63.2406.
    (2) API Publication 2518, Evaporative Loss from Fixed-roof Tanks,
Second Edition, October 1991, IBR approved for Sec.  63.150(g).
    (3) API Manual of Petroleum Measurement Specifications (MPMS)
Chapter 19.2 (API MPMS 19.2), Evaporative Loss From Floating-Roof
Tanks, First Edition, April 1997, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.1251
and 63.12005.
    (e) American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-
Conditioning Engineers at 1791 Tullie Circle, NE., Atlanta, GA 30329
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (1) American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air
Conditioning Engineers Method 52.1, ``Gravimetric and Dust-Spot
Procedures for Testing Air-Cleaning Devices Used in General Ventilation
for Removing Particulate Matter, June 4, 1992,'' IBR approved for
Sec. Sec.  63.11173(e) and 63.11516(d).
    (2) [Reserved]
    (f) American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Three Park
Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990, Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, http://www.asme.org; also available from HIS, Incorporated, 15 Inverness Way
East, Englewood, CO 80112, Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, http://global.ihs.com.
    (1) ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10-1981, Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses [Part
10, Instruments and Apparatus], issued August 31, 1981, IBR approved
for Sec. Sec.  63.309(k), 63.457(k), 63.772(e) and (h), 63.865(b),
63.1282(d) and (g), 63.3166(a), 63.3360(e), 63.3545(a), 63.3555(a),
63.4166(a), 63.4362(a), 63.4766(a), 63.4965(a), 63.5160(d), table 4 to
subpart UUUU, 63.9307(c), 63.9323(a), 63.11148(e), 63.11155(e),
63.11162(f), 63.11163(g), 63.11410(j), 63.11551(a), 63.11646(a), and
63.11945, table 5 to subpart DDDDD, table 4 to subpart JJJJJ, tables 4
and 5 of subpart UUUUU, and table 1 to subpart ZZZZZ.
    (2) [Reserved]
    (g) American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 100 Barr
Harbor Drive, Post Office Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, http://www.astm.org; also available from
ProQuest, 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346,
Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, http://www.proquest.com.
    (1) ASTM D95-05 (Reapproved 2010), Standard Test Method for Water
in Petroleum Products and Bituminous Materials by Distillation,
approved May 1, 2010, IBR approved for Sec.  63.10005(i) and table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
    (2) ASTM D240-09 Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter, approved July 1, 2009,
IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (3) ASTM Method D388-05, Standard Classification of Coals by Rank,
approved September 15, 2005, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.7575,
63.10042, and 63.11237.
    (4) ASTM Method D396-10, Standard Specification for Fuel Oils,
including Appendix X1, approved October 1, 2010, IBR approved for Sec.
63.10042.
    (5) ASTM D396-10, Standard Specification for Fuel Oils, approved
October 1, 2010, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.7575 and 63.11237.
    (6) ASTM D523-89, Standard Test Method for Specular Gloss, IBR
approved for Sec.  63.782.
    (7) ASTM D975-11b, Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils,
approved December 1, 2011, IBR approved for Sec.  63.7575.
    (8) ASTM D1193-77, Standard Specification for Reagent Water, IBR
approved for appendix A to part 63: Method 306, Sections 7.1.1 and
7.4.2.
    (9) ASTM D1193-91, Standard Specification for Reagent Water, IBR
approved for appendix A to part 63: Method 306, Sections 7.1.1 and
7.4.2.
    (10) ASTM D1331-89, Standard Test Methods for Surface and
Interfacial Tension of Solutions of Surface Active Agents, IBR approved
for appendix A to part 63: Method 306B, Sections 6.2, 11.1, and 12.2.2.

    (11) ASTM D1475-90, Standard Test Method for Density of Paint,
Varnish Lacquer, and Related Products, IBR approved for appendix A to
subpart II.
    (12) ASTM D1475-98 (Reapproved 2003), ``Standard Test Method for
Density of Liquid Coatings, Inks, and Related Products,'' IBR approved
for Sec. Sec.  63.3151(b), 63.3941(b) and (c), 63.3951(c), 63.4141(b)
and (c), and 63.4551(c).
    (13) ASTM Method D1835-05, Standard Specification for Liquefied
Petroleum (LP) Gases, approved April 1, 2005, IBR approved for
Sec. Sec.  63.7575 and 63.11237.
    (14) ASTM D1945-03 (Reapproved 2010), Standard Test Method for
Analysis of Natural Gas by Gas Chromatography, (Approved January 1,
2010), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.772(h), and 63.1282(g).
    (15) ASTM D1946-77, Standard Method for Analysis of Reformed Gas by
Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec.  63.11(b).
    (16) ASTM D1946-90 (Reapproved 1994), Standard Method for Analysis
of Reformed Gas by Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec.  63.11(b).
    (17) ASTM D2013/D2013M-09, Standard Practice for Preparing Coal
Samples for Analysis, (Approved November 1, 2009), IBR approved for
table 6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
    (18) ASTM D2099-00, Standard Test Method for Dynamic Water
Resistance of Shoe Upper Leather by the Maeser Water Penetration
Tester, IBR approved for Sec.  63.5350.
    (19) ASTM D2216-05, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory
Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass, IBR
approved for the definition of ``Free organic liquids'' in Sec.
63.10692.
    (20) ASTM D2234/D2234M-10, Standard Practice for Collection of a
Gross Sample of Coal, approved January 1, 2010, IBR approved for table
6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ .
    (21) ASTM D2369-93, Standard Test Method for Volatile Content of
Coatings, IBR approved for appendix A to subpart II.
    (22) ASTM D2369-95, Standard Test Method for Volatile Content of
Coatings, IBR approved for appendix A to subpart II.
    (23) ASTM D2382-76, Heat of Combustion of Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb
Calorimeter (High-Precision Method), IBR approved for Sec.  63.11(b).
    (24) ASTM D2382-88, Heat of Combustion of Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb
Calorimeter (High-Precision Method), IBR approved for Sec.  63.11(b).
    (25) ASTM D2697-86 (Reapproved 1998), Standard Test Method for
Volume Nonvolatile Matter in Clear or Pigmented Coatings, IBR approved
for Sec. Sec.  63.3161(f), 63.3521(b), 63.3941(b), 63.4141(b),
63.4741(b), 63.4941(b), and 63.5160(c).
    (26) ASTM D2879-83, Standard Method for Vapor Pressure-Temperature
Relationship and Initial Decomposition Temperature of Liquids by
Isoteniscope, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.111, 63.2406, and
63.12005.
    (27) ASTM D2879-96, Test Method for Vapor Pressure-Temperature
Relationship and Initial Decomposition Temperature of Liquids by
Isoteniscope, (Approved 1996), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.111,
63.2406, and 63.12005.
    (28) ASTM D3173-03 (Reapproved 2008), Standard Test Method for
Moisture in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke, (Approved February 1,
2008), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart
JJJJJJ.
    (29) ASTM D3257-93, Standard Test Methods for Aromatics in Mineral
Spirits by Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec.  63.786(b).
    (30) ASTM D3588-98 (Reapproved 2003), Standard Practice for
Calculating Heat Value, Compressibility Factor, and Relative Density of
Gaseous Fuels, (Approved May 10, 2003), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.772(h) and 63.1282(g).
    (31) ASTM D3695-88, Standard Test Method for Volatile Alcohols in
Water by Direct Aqueous-Injection Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for
Sec.  63.365(e).
    (32) ASTM D3792-91, Standard Method for Water Content of Water-
Reducible Paints by Direct Injection into a Gas Chromatograph, IBR
approved for appendix A to subpart II.
    (33) ASTM D3912-80, Standard Test Method for Chemical Resistance of
Coatings Used in Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants, IBR approved for
Sec.  63.782.
    (34) ASTM D4006-11, Standard Test Method for Water in Crude Oil by
Distillation, including Annex A1 and Appendix X1, (Approved June 1,
2011), IBR approved for Sec.  63.10005(i) and table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (35) ASTM D4017-81, Standard Test Method for Water in Paints and
Paint Materials by the Karl Fischer Titration Method, IBR approved for
appendix A to subpart II.
    (36) ASTM D4017-90, Standard Test Method for Water in Paints and
Paint Materials by the Karl Fischer Titration Method, IBR approved for
appendix A to subpart II.
    (37) ASTM D4017-96a, Standard Test Method for Water in Paints and
Paint Materials by the Karl Fischer Titration Method, IBR approved for
appendix A to subpart II.
    (38) ASTM D4057-06 (Reapproved 2011), Standard Practice for Manual
Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products, including Annex A1,
(Approved June 1, 2011), IBR approved for Sec.  63.10005(i) and table 6
to subpart DDDDD.
    (39) ASTM D4082-89, Standard Test Method for Effects of Gamma
Radiation on Coatings for Use in Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants, IBR
approved for Sec.  63.782.
    (40) ASTM D4084-07, Standard Test Method for Analysis of Hydrogen
Sulfide in Gaseous Fuels (Lead Acetate Reaction Rate Method), (Approved
June 1, 2007), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (41) ASTM D4177-95 (Reapproved 2010), Standard Practice for
Automatic Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products, including
Annexes A1 through A6 and Appendices X1 and X2, (Approved May 1, 2010),
IBR approved for Sec.  63.10005(i) and table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (42) ASTM D4208-02 (Reapproved 2007), Standard Test Method for
Total Chlorine in Coal by the Oxygen Bomb Combustion/Ion Selective
Electrode Method, approved May 1, 2007, IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
    (43) ASTM D4256-89, Standard Test Method for Determination of the
Decontaminability of Coatings Used in Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants,
IBR approved for Sec.  63.782.
    (44) ASTM D4256-89 (Reapproved 94), Standard Test Method for
Determination of the Decontaminability of Coatings Used in Light-Water
Nuclear Power Plants, IBR approved for Sec.  63.782.
    (45) ASTM D4606-03 (Reapproved 2007), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Arsenic and Selenium in Coal by the Hydride
Generation/Atomic Absorption Method, (Approved October 1, 2007), IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (46) ASTM D4809-95, Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter (Precision Method), IBR
approved for Sec.  63.11(b).
    (47) ASTM D4891-89 (Reapproved 2006), Standard Test Method for
Heating Value of Gases in Natural Gas Range by Stoichiometric
Combustion, (Approved June 1, 2006), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.772(h) and 63.1282(g).
    (48) ASTM D5066-91 (Reapproved 2001), Standard Test Method for
Determination of the Transfer Efficiency Under Production Conditions
for Spray Application of Automotive Paints-

Weight Basis, IBR approved for Sec.  63.3161(g).
    (49) ASTM D5087-02, Standard Test Method for Determining Amount of
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Released from Solventborne Automotive
Coatings and Available for Removal in a VOC Control Device (Abatement),
IBR approved for Sec.  63.3165(e) and appendix A to subpart IIII.
    (50) ASTM D5192-09, Standard Practice for Collection of Coal
Samples from Core, (Approved June 1, 2009), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
    (51) ASTM D5198-09, Standard Practice for Nitric Acid Digestion of
Solid Waste, (Approved February 1, 2009), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
    (52) ASTM D5228-92, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Butane Working Capacity of Activated Carbon, (Reapproved 2005), IBR
approved for Sec.  63.11092(b).
    (53) ASTM D5291-02, Standard Test Methods for Instrumental
Determination of Carbon, Hydrogen, and Nitrogen in Petroleum Products
and Lubricants, IBR approved for appendix A to subpart MMMM.
    (54) ASTM D5790-95, Standard Test Method for Measurement of
Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Capillary Column Gas
Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, IBR approved for Table 4 to subpart
UUUU.
    (55) ASTM D5864-11, Standard Test Method for Determining Aerobic
Aquatic Biodegradation of Lubricants or Their Components, (Approved
March 1, 2011), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (56) ASTM D5865-10a, Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value
of Coal and Coke, (Approved May 1, 2010), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
    (57) ASTM D5954-98 (Reapproved 2006), Test Method for Mercury
Sampling and Measurement in Natural Gas by Atomic Absorption
Spectroscopy, (Approved December 1, 2006), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
    (58) ASTM D5965-02, Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of
Coating Powders, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.3151(b) and 63.3951(c).
    (59) ASTM D6053-00, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Content of Electrical Insulating
Varnishes, IBR approved for appendix A to subpart MMMM.
    (60) ASTM D6093-97 (Reapproved 2003), Standard Test Method for
Percent Volume Nonvolatile Matter in Clear or Pigmented Coatings Using
a Helium Gas Pycnometer, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.3161, 63.3521,
63.3941, 63.4141, 63.4741(b), 63.4941(b), and 63.5160(c).
    (61) ASTM D6266-00a, Test Method for Determining the Amount of
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Released from Waterborne Automotive
Coatings and Available for Removal in a VOC Control Device (Abatement),
IBR approved for Sec.  63.3165(e).
    (62) ASTM D6323-98 (Reapproved 2003), Standard Guide for Laboratory
Subsampling of Media Related to Waste Management Activities, (Approved
August 10, 2003), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5
to subpart JJJJJJ.
    (63) ASTM D6348-03, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Gaseous Compounds by Extractive Direct Interface Fourier Transform
Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.457(b) and
63.1349, table 4 to subpart DDDD, table 4 to subpart ZZZZ, and table 8
to subpart HHHHHHH.
    (64) ASTM D6348-03 (Reapproved 2010), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Gaseous Compounds by Extractive Direct Interface
Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy, including Annexes A1
through A8, (Approved October 1, 2010), IBR approved for tables 1, 2,
and 5 to subpart UUUUU and appendix B to subpart UUUUU.
    (65) ASTM D6350-98 (Reapproved 2003), Standard Test Method for
Mercury Sampling and Analysis in Natural Gas by Atomic Fluorescence
Spectroscopy, (Approved May 10, 2003), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
    (66) ASTM D6357-11, Test Methods for Determination of Trace
Elements in Coal, Coke, and Combustion Residues from Coal Utilization
Processes by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry,
(Approved April 1, 2011), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (67) ASTM D6420-99, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Gaseous Organic Compounds by Direct Interface Gas Chromatography-Mass
Spectrometry, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.5799, 63.5850, and Table 4
of Subpart UUUU.
    (68) ASTM D6420-99 (Reapproved 2004), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Gaseous Organic Compounds by Direct Interface Gas
Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, (Approved October 1, 2004), IBR
approved for Sec. Sec.  63.457(b), 63.485(g), 60.485a(g), 63.772(a),
63.772(e), 63.1282(a) and (d), 63.2351(b), and 63.2354(b), and table 8
to subpart HHHHHHH.
    (69) ASTM D6522-00, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, and Oxygen Concentrations in
Emissions from Natural Gas Fired Reciprocating Engines, Combustion
Turbines, Boilers, and Process Heaters Using Portable Analyzers, IBR
approved for Sec.  63.9307(c).
    (70) ASTM D6522-00 (Reapproved 2005), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, and Oxygen
Concentrations in Emissions from Natural Gas Fired Reciprocating
Engines, Combustion Turbines, Boilers, and Process Heaters Using
Portable Analyzers, (Approved October 1, 2005), IBR approved for table
4 to subpart ZZZZ, table 5 to subpart DDDDDD, table 4 to subpart
JJJJJJ, and Sec. Sec.  63.772(e) and (h)) and 63.1282(d) and (g).
    (71) ASTM D6721-01 (Reapproved 2006), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Chlorine in Coal by Oxidative Hydrolysis
Microcoulometry, (Approved April 1, 2006), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
    (72) ASTM D6722-01 (Reapproved 2006), Standard Test Method for
Total Mercury in Coal and Coal Combustion Residues by the Direct
Combustion Analysis, (Approved April 1, 2006), IBR approved for Table 6
to subpart DDDDD and Table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
    (73) ASTM D6751-11b, Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel
Blend Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels, (Approved July 15,
2011), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.7575 and 63.11237.
    (74) ASTM D6784-02 (Reapproved 2008), Standard Test Method for
Elemental, Oxidized, Particle-Bound and Total Mercury in Flue Gas
Generated from Coal-Fired Stationary Sources (Ontario Hydro Method),
(Approved April 1, 2008), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.11646(a),
63.11647(a) and (d), tables 1, 2, 5, 11, 12t, and 13 to subpart DDDDD,
table 4 to subpart JJJJJJ, table 5 to subpart UUUUU, and appendix A to
subpart UUUUU.
    (75) ASTM D6883-04, Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of
Stationary Coal from Railroad Cars, Barges, Trucks, or Stockpiles,
(Approved June 1, 2004), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (76) ASTM D7430-11ae1, Standard Practice for Mechanical Sampling of
Coal, (Approved October 1, 2011), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart
DDDDD.
    (77) ASTM E145-94 (Reapproved 2001), Standard Specification for
Gravity-Convection and Forced-Ventilation Ovens, IBR approved for
appendix A to subpart PPPP.
    (78) ASTM E180-93, Standard Practice for Determining the Precision
of

ASTM Methods for Analysis and Testing of Industrial Chemicals, IBR
approved for Sec.  63.786(b).
    (79) ASTM E260-91, General Practice for Packed Column Gas
Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.750(b) and 63.786(b).
    (80) ASTM E260-96, General Practice for Packed Column Gas
Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.750(b) and 63.786(b).
    (81) ASTM E515-95 (Reapproved 2000), Standard Test Method for Leaks
Using Bubble Emission Techniques, IBR approved for Sec.  63.425(i).
    (82) ASTM E711-87 (Reapproved 2004), Standard Test Method for Gross
Calorific Value of Refuse-Derived Fuel by the Bomb Calorimeter,
(Approved August 28, 1987), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD
and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
    (83) ASTM E776-87 (Reapproved 2009), Standard Test Method for Forms
of Chlorine in Refuse-Derived Fuel, (Approved July 1, 2009), IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (84) ASTM E871-82 (Reapproved 2006), Standard Test Method for
Moisture Analysis of Particulate Wood Fuels, (Approved November 1,
2006), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart
JJJJJJ.
    (h) Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), 939 Ellis
Street, San Francisco, California 94109, http://www.arb.ca.gov/DRDB/BA/CURHTML/ST/st30.pdf.
    (1) ``BAAQMD Source Test Procedure ST-30--Static Pressure Integrity
Test, Underground Storage Tanks,'' adopted November 30, 1983, and
amended December 21, 1994, IBR approved for Sec.  63.11120(a).
    (2) [Reserved]
    (i) British Standards Institute, 389 Chiswick High Road, London W4
4AL, United Kingdom.
    (1) BS EN 1593:1999, Non-destructive Testing: Leak Testing--Bubble
Emission Techniques, IBR approved for Sec.  63.425(i).
    (2) [Reserved]
    (j) California Air Resources Board (CARB), Engineering and
Certification Branch, 1001 I Street, P.O. Box 2815, Sacramento, CA
95812-2815, Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, http://www.arb.ca.gov/vapor/vapor.htm.
    (1) California Air Resources Board Vapor Recovery Test Procedure
TP-201.1--``Volumetric Efficiency for Phase I Vapor Recovery Systems,''
adopted April 12, 1996, and amended February 1, 2001 and October 8,
2003, IBR approved for Sec.  63.11120(b).
    (2) California Air Resources Board Vapor Recovery Test Procedure
TP-201.1E--``Leak Rate and Cracking Pressure of Pressure/Vacuum Vent
Valves,'' adopted October 8, 2003, IBR approved for Sec.  63.11120(a).
    (3) California Air Resources Board Vapor Recovery Test Procedure
TP-201.3--``Determination of 2-Inch WC Static Pressure Performance of
Vapor Recovery Systems of Dispensing Facilities,'' adopted April 12,
1996 and amended March 17, 1999, IBR approved for Sec.  63.11120(a).
    (k) Environmental Protection Agency. Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460,
telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (1) California Regulatory Requirements Applicable to the Air Toxics
Program, November 16, 2010, IBR approved for Sec.  63.99(a).
    (2) New Jersey's Toxic Catastrophe Prevention Act Program, (July
20, 1998), IBR approved for Sec.  63.99(a).
    (3) Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental
Control, Division of Air and Waste Management, Accidental Release
Prevention Regulation, sections 1 through 5 and sections 7 through 14,
effective January 11, 1999, IBR approved for Sec.  63.99(a).
    (4) State of Delaware Regulations Governing the Control of Air
Pollution (October 2000), IBR approved for Sec.  63.99(a).
    (5) Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
regulations at 310 CMR 7.26(10)-(16), Air Pollution Control, effective
as of September 5, 2008, corrected March 6, 2009, and 310 CMR 70.00,
Environmental Results Program Certification, effective as of December
28, 2007. IBR approved for Sec.  63.99(a).
    (6)(i) New Hampshire Regulations Applicable to Hazardous Air
Pollutants, March, 2003. IBR approved for Sec.  63.99(a).
    (ii) New Hampshire Regulations Applicable to Hazardous Air
Pollutants, September 2006. IBR approved for Sec.  63.99(a).
    (7) Maine Department of Environmental Protection regulations at
Chapter 125, Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaner Regulation, effective as of
June 2, 1991, last amended on June 24, 2009. IBR approved for Sec.
63.99(a).
    (8) California South Coast Air Quality Management District's
``Spray Equipment Transfer Efficiency Test Procedure for Equipment
User, May 24, 1989,'' IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.11173(e) and
63.11516(d).
    (9) California South Coast Air Quality Management District's
``Guidelines for Demonstrating Equivalency with District Approved
Transfer Efficient Spray Guns, September 26, 2002,'' Revision 0, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec.  63.11173(e) and 63.11516(d).
    (10) Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
regulations at Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 36, Control of
Emissions from Organic Solvent Cleaning, effective April 8, 1996, last
amended October 9, 2008, IBR approved for Sec.  63.99(a).
    (11) Rhode Island Air Pollution Control, General Definitions
Regulation, effective July 19, 2007, last amended October 9, 2008. IBR
approved for Sec.  63.99(a).
    (12) Alaska Statute 42.45.045. Renewable energy grant fund and
recommendation program, available at http://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/folio.asp, IBR approved for Sec.  63.6675.
    (l) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20460,<PHONE_NUMBER>, http://www.epa.gov.
    (1) EPA-453/R-01-005, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Integrated Iron and Steel Plants--Background
Information for Proposed Standards, Final Report, January 2001, IBR
approved for Sec.  63.7491(g).
    (2) EPA-454/R-98-015, Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards
(OAQPS), Fabric Filter Bag Leak Detection Guidance, September 1997, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec.  63.548(e), 63.7525(j), and 63.11224(f).
    (3) SW-846-3020A, Acid Digestion of Aqueous Samples And Extracts
For Total Metals For Analysis By GFAA Spectroscopy, Revision 1, July
1992, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved for table
6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
    (4) SW-846-3050B, Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Soils,
Revision 2, December 1996, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition,
IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart
JJJJJJ.
    (5) SW-846-7470A, Mercury In Liquid Waste (Manual Cold-Vapor
Technique), Revision 1, September 1994, in EPA Publication No. SW-846,
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to
subpart JJJJJJ.
    (6) SW-846-7471B, Mercury In Solid Or Semisolid Waste (Manual Cold-
Vapor Technique), Revision 2, February 2007, in EPA Publication No. SW-
846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods,

Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to
subpart JJJJJJ.
    (7) SW-846-8015C, Nonhalogenated Organics by Gas Chromatography,
Revision 3, February 2007, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition,
IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.11960, 63.11980, and table 10 to subpart
HHHHHHH.
    (8) SW-846-8260B, Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), Revision 2, December 1996, in EPA
Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.11960, 63.11980, and table 10 to subpart HHHHHHH.
    (9) SW-846-8270D, Semivolatile Organic Compounds by Gas
Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), Revision 4, February 2007, in
EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.11960, 63.11980, and table 10 to subpart HHHHHHH.
    (10) SW-846-8315A, Determination of Carbonyl Compounds by High
Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), Revision 1, December 1996, in
EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.11960 and 63.11980, and table 10 to subpart HHHHHHH.
    (11) SW-846-5050, Bomb Preparation Method for Solid Waste, Revision
0, September 1994, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (12) SW-846-6010C, Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission
Spectrometry, Revision 3, February 2007, in EPA Publication No. SW-846,
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (13) SW-846-6020A, Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry,
Revision 1, February 2007, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition,
IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (14) SW-846-7060A, Arsenic (Atomic Absorption, Furnace Technique),
Revision 1, September 1994, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition,
IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (15) SW-846-7740, Selenium (Atomic Absorption, Furnace Technique),
Revision 0, September 1986, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition,
IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (16) SW-846-9056, Determination of Inorganic Anions by Ion
Chromatography, Revision 1, February 2007, in EPA Publication No. SW-
846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (17) SW-846-9076, Test Method for Total Chlorine in New and Used
Petroleum Products by Oxidative Combustion and Microcoulometry,
Revision 0, September 1994, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition,
IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (18) SW-846-9250, Chloride (Colorimetric, Automated Ferricyanide
AAI), Revision 0, September 1986, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third
Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (19) Method 200.8, Determination of Trace Elements in Waters and
Wastes by Inductively Coupled Plasma--Mass Spectrometry, Revision 5.4,
1994, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (20) Method 1631 Revision E, Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge
and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Fluorescence Spectrometry,
Revision E, EPA-821-R-02-019, August 2002, IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
    (m) International Standards Organization (ISO), 1, ch. de la Voie-
Creuse, Case postale 56, CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland, +41 22 749 01
11, http://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm.
    (1) ISO 6978-1:2003(E), Natural Gas--Determination of Mercury--Part
1: Sampling of Mercury by Chemisorption on Iodine, First edition,
October 15, 2003, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (2) ISO 6978-2:2003(E), Natural gas--Determination of Mercury--Part
2: Sampling of Mercury by Amalgamation on Gold/Platinum Alloy, First
edition, October 15, 2003, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (n) National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream
Improvement, Inc. (NCASI), P.O. Box 133318, Research Triangle Park, NC
27709-3318 or at http://www.ncasi.org.
    (1) NCASI Method DI/MEOH-94.03, Methanol in Process Liquids and
Wastewaters by GC/FID, Issued May 2000, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.457 and 63.459.
    (2) NCASI Method CI/WP-98.01, Chilled Impinger Method For Use At
Wood Products Mills to Measure Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Phenol,
1998, Methods Manual, IBR approved for table 4 to subpart DDDD.
    (3) NCASI Method DI/HAPS-99.01, Selected HAPs In Condensates by GC/
FID, Issued February 2000, IBR approved for Sec.  63.459(b).
    (4) NCASI Method IM/CAN/WP-99.02, Impinger/Canister Source Sampling
Method for Selected HAPs and Other Compounds at Wood Products
Facilities, January 2004, Methods Manual, IBR approved for table 4 to
subpart DDDD.
    (5) NCASI Method ISS/FP A105.01, Impinger Source Sampling Method
for Selected Aldehydes, Ketones, and Polar Compounds, December 2005,
Methods Manual, IBR approved for table 4 to subpart DDDD.
    (o) National Technical Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal
Road, Springfield, VA 22161,<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>; or for
purchase from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing
Office, Washington, DC 20402,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (1) Handbook 44, Specificiations, Tolerances, and Other Technical
Requirements for Weighing and Measuring Devices 1998, IBR approved for
Sec.  63.1303(e).
    (2) ``Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods,'' EPA Publication SW-846, Third Edition. (A suffix of ``A'' in
the method number indicates revision one (the method has been revised
once). A suffix of ``B'' in the method number indicates revision two
(the method has been revised twice).
    (i) Method 0023A, ``Sampling Method for Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-
Dioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofuran Emissions from Stationary
Sources,'' dated December 1996, IBR approved for Sec.  63.1208(b).
    (ii) Method 9071B, ``n-Hexane Extractable Material (HEM) for
Sludge, Sediment, and Solid Samples,'' dated April 1998, IBR approved
for Sec.  63.7824(e).
    (iii) Method 9095A, ``Paint Filter Liquids Test,'' dated December
1996, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.7700(b) and 63.7765.
    (iv) Method 9095B, ``Paint Filter Liquids Test,'' (revision 2),
dated November 2004, IBR approved for the definition of ``Free organic
liquids'' in Sec. Sec.  63.10692, 63.10885(a), and the definition of
``Free liquids'' in Sec.  63.10906.

    (v) SW-846 74741B, Revision 2, ``Mercury in Solid or Semisolid
Waste (Manual Cold-Vapor Technique),'' February 2007, IBR approved for
Sec.  63.11647(f).
    (3) National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
test method compendium, ``NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods,'' NIOSH
publication no. 94-113, Fourth Edition, August 15, 1994.
    (i) NIOSH Method 2010, ``Amines, Aliphatic,'' Issue 2, August 15,
1994, IBR approved for Sec.  63.7732(g).
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (p) North American Electric Reliability Corporation, 1325 G Street,
NW., Suite 600, Washington, DC 20005-3801, http://www.nerc.com, http://www.nerc.com/files/EOP0002-3_1.pdf.
    (1) North American Electric Reliability Corporation Reliability
Standard EOP-002-3, Capacity and Energy Emergencies, adopted August 5,
2010, IBR approved for Sec.  63.6640(f).
    (2)[Reserved]
    (q) Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry (TAPPI),
15 Technology Parkway South, Norcross, GA 30092,<PHONE_NUMBER>, http://www.tappi.org.
    (1) TAPPI T 266, Determination of Sodium, Calcium, Copper, Iron,
and Manganese in Pulp and Paper by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
(Reaffirmation of T 266 om-02), Draft No. 2, July 2006, IBR approved
for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
    (2) [Reserved]
    (r) Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Library, Post
Office Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087, telephone number (512) 239-
0028, http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/assets/public/implementation/air/sip/sipdocs/2002-12-HGB/02046sipapp_ado.pdf.
    (1) ``Air Stripping Method (Modified El Paso Method) for
Determination of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Water
Sources,'' Revision Number One, dated January 2003, Sampling Procedures
Manual, Appendix P: Cooling Tower Monitoring, January 31, 2003, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec.  63.654 and 63.11920.
    (2) [Reserved]

Subpart G--[Amended]

0
43. Amend Sec.  63.144 by adding paragraphs (b)(5)(i)(G) and (H) to
read as follows:

Sec.  63.144  Process wastewater provisions--test methods and
procedures for determining applicability and Group 1/Group 2
determinations (determining which wastewater streams require control).

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (5) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (G) Method 8260B. Use procedures specified in Method 8260B in the
SW-846 Compendium of Methods.
    (H) Method 316. Use Method 316 to determine formaldehyde
concentration.
* * * * *

Subpart N--[Amended]

0
44. Amend Sec.  63.344 by adding paragraph (c)(5) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.344  Performance test requirements and test methods.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (5) The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Method
205.1 (which is available by contacting the South Coast AQMD, 21865
Copley Dr, Diamond Bar, CA 91765) may be used to determine the total
chromium concentration from hard and decorative chromium electroplating
tanks and chromium anodizing tanks.
* * * * *

Subpart O--[Amended]

0
45. Amend Sec.  63.364 by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.364  Monitoring requirements.

* * * * *
    (e) Measure and record once per hour the ethylene oxide
concentration at the outlet to the atmosphere after any control device
according to the procedures specified in Sec.  63.365(c)(1). The owner
or operator shall compute and record a 24-hour average daily. The owner
or operator will install, calibrate, operate, and maintain a monitor
consistent with the requirements of performance specification (PS) 8 or
9 in 40 CFR part 60, appendix B, to measure ethylene oxide. The daily
calibration requirements of section 7.2 of PS-9 or Section 13.1 of PS-8
are required only on days when ethylene oxide emissions are vented to
the control device.
* * * * *

0
46. Amend Sec.  63.365 by revising the introductory text of paragraph
(b) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.365  Test methods and procedures.

* * * * *
    (b) Efficiency at the sterilization chamber vent. California Air
Resources Board (CARB) Method 431 or the following procedures shall be
used to determine the efficiency of all types of control devices used
to comply with Sec.  63.362(c), sterilization chamber vent standard.
* * * * *

Subpart Y--[Amended]

0
47. Amend Sec.  63.565 by revising paragraphs (d)(5), (8), and (10) and
(g) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.565  Test methods and procedures.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (5) Recovery devices. The average VOC concentration in the vent
upstream and downstream of the control device shall be determined using
Method 25A or 25B of appendix A-7 to part 60 of this chapter for
recovery devices. The average VOC concentration shall correspond to the
volume measurement by taking into account the sampling system response
time.
* * * * *
    (8) Where Method 25, 25A, or 25B is used to measure the percent
reduction in VOC, the percent reduction across the combustion or
recovery device shall be calculated as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.025

Where:

R = control efficiency of control device, percent.
Ei = mass flow rate of VOC at the inlet to the combustion
or recovery device as calculated under paragraph (c)(7) of this
section, kg/hr.
Eo = mass flow rate of VOC at the outlet of the
combustion or recovery device, as calculated under paragraph (c)(7)
of this section, kg/hr.
* * * * *
    (10) Use of methods other than Method 25, 25A, or 25B shall be
validated pursuant to Method 301 of appendix A to part 63 of this
chapter.
* * * * *
    (g) Baseline outlet VOC concentration. The procedures in this
paragraph shall be used to determine the outlet VOC concentration
required in Sec.  63.563(b)(4), (6), (7), and (8) for combustion
devices except flare, carbon adsorbers, condenser/refrigeration units,
and absorbers, respectively, and to monitor the VOC concentration as
required in Sec.  63.564(e), (g), (h), and (i). The owner or operator
shall use the procedures outlined in Method 25A or 25B. For the
baseline VOC concentration, the arithmetic average of the outlet VOC
concentration from three test runs from paragraph (d) of this section
shall be calculated for the control device. The VOC concentration shall
be measured at least every 15 minutes. Compliance testing of VOC CEMS
shall be performed using PS 8.
* * * * *

Subpart GG--[Amended]

0
48. Amend Sec.  63.750 by revising paragraph (o) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.750  Test methods and procedures.

* * * * *
    (o) Inorganic HAP emissions--dry particulate filter certification
requirements. Dry particulate filters used to comply with Sec.
63.745(g)(2) or Sec.  63.746(b)(4) must be certified by the filter
manufacturer or distributor, paint/depainting booth supplier, and/or
the facility owner or operator using method 319 in appendix A of this
part, to meet or exceed the efficiency data points found in Tables 1
and 2, or 3 and 4 of Sec.  63.745 for existing or new sources
respectively.

Subpart GGG--[Amended]

0
49. Amend Sec.  63.1251 by revising the definition of ``Process vent''
to read as follows:

Sec.  63.1251  Definitions.

* * * * *
    Process vent means a vent from a unit operation or vents from
multiple unit operations within a process that are manifolded together
into a common header, through which a HAP-containing gas stream is, or
has the potential to be, released to the atmosphere. Examples of
process vents include, but are not limited to, vents on condensers used
for product recovery, bottom receivers, surge control vessels,
reactors, filters, centrifuges, and process tanks. Emission streams
that are undiluted and uncontrolled containing less than 50 ppmv HAP,
as determined through process knowledge that no HAP are present in the
emission stream or using an engineering assessment as discussed in
Sec.  63.1257(d)(2)(ii); test data using Method 18 of 40 CFR part 60,
appendix A-6; Method 320 of 40 CFR part 63; or any other test method
that has been validated according to the procedures in Method 301 of
appendix A of this part, are not considered process vents. Process
vents do not include vents on storage tanks regulated under Sec.
63.1253, vents on wastewater emission sources regulated under Sec.
63.1256, or pieces of equipment regulated under Sec.  63.1255.
* * * * *

Subpart RRR--[Amended]

0
50. Amend Sec.  63.1511 by revising paragraph (c)(9) as to read
follows:

Sec.  63.1511  Performance test/compliance demonstration general
requirements.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (9) Method 26A for the concentration of HCl. Where a lime-injected
fabric filter is used as the control device to comply with the 90
percent reduction standard, the owner or operator must measure the
fabric filter inlet concentration of HCl at a point before lime is
introduced to the system. Method 26 may be used in place of Method 26A
where it can be demonstrated that there are no water droplets in the
emission stream. This can be demonstrated by showing that the vapor
pressure of water in the emission stream that you are testing is less
than the equilibrium vapor pressure of water at the emission stream
temperature, and by certifying that the emission stream is not
controlled by a wet scrubber.
* * * * *

Subpart CCCC--[Amended]

0
51. Revise Table 2 to subpart CCCC to read as follows:
    As stated in Sec.  63.2161, if you demonstrate compliance by
monitoring brew ethanol, you must comply with the requirements for
performance tests in the following table:

 Table 2 to Subpart CCCC of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
                     [Brew Ethanol Monitoring Only]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each fed-batch fermenter
   for which compliance is
  determined by monitoring
 brew ethanol concentration
     and calculating VOC                              According to the
    concentration in the           Using . . .            following
 fermenter exhaust according                         requirements . . .
  to the procedures in Sec.
   63.2161, you must . . .

------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Measure VOC as propane...  Method 25A *, or an   You must measure the
                               alternative           VOC concentration
                               validated by EPA      in the fermenter
                               Method 301 * and      exhaust at any
                               approved by the       point prior to the
                               Administrator.        dilution of the
                                                     exhaust stream.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* EPA Test Methods found in Appendix A of 40 CFR part 60.

Subpart UUUU--[Amended]

0
52. Revise Table 4 to subpart UUUU to read as follows:
    As required in Sec. Sec.  63.5530(b) and 63.5535(a), (b), (g)(1),
and (h)(1), you must conduct performance tests, other initial
compliance demonstrations, and CEMS performance evaluations and
establish operating limits according to the requirements in the
following table:

                     Table 4 to Subpart UUUU of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                according to the
           For . . .                  at . . .        you must . . .      using . . .     following requirements
                                                                                . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. the sum of all process vents  a. each existing   i. select          EPA Method 1 or    sampling sites must be
                                  or new affected    sampling port's    1A in appendix A   located at the inlet
                                  source.            location and the   to 40 CFR Sec.     and outlet to each
                                                     number of          63.7(d)(1)(i);     control device;
                                                     traverse points;
                                                    ii. determine      EPA Method 2, 2A,  you may use EPA Method
                                                     velocity and       2C, 2D, 2F, or     2A, 2C, 2D, 2F, or 2G
                                                     volumetric flow    2G in appendices   as an alternative to
                                                     rate;              A-1 and A-2 to     using EPA Method 2,
                                                                        part 60 of this    as appropriate;
                                                                        chapter;

                                                    iii. conduct gas   (1) EPA Method 3,  you may use EPA Method
                                                     analysis; and,     3A, or 3B in       3A or 3B as an
                                                                        appendix A-2 to    alternative to using
                                                                        part 60 of this    EPA Method 3; or,
                                                                        chapter; or,
                                                                       (2) ASME PTC       you may use ASME PTC
                                                                        19.10-1981--Part   19.10-1981--Part 10
                                                                        10; and,           (available for
                                                                                purchase from Three
                                                                                Park Avenue, New
                                                                                York, NY 10016-5990)
                                                                                as an alternative to
                                                                                using EPA Method 3B.
                                                    iv. measure        EPA Method 4 in
                                                     moisture content   appendix A-3 to
                                                     of the stack       part 60 of this
                                                     gas.               chapter.
2. the sum of all viscose        a. each existing   i. measure total   (1) EPA Method 15  (a) you must conduct
 process vents.                   or new viscose     sulfide            in appendix A-5    testing of emissions
                                  process source.    emissions.         to part 60 of      at the inlet and
                                                                        this chapter; or   outlet of each
                                                                                control device;
                                                                                (b) you must conduct
                                                                                testing of emissions
                                                                                from continuous
                                                                                viscose process vents
                                                                                and combinations of
                                                                                batch and continuous
                                                                                viscose process vents
                                                                                at normal operating
                                                                                conditions, as
                                                                                specified in Sec.
                                                                                Sec.   63.7(e)(1) and
                                                                                63.5535;
                                                                                (c) you must conduct
                                                                                testing of emissions
                                                                                from batch viscose
                                                                                process vents as
                                                                                specified in Sec.
                                                                                63.490(c), except
                                                                                that the emission
                                                                                reductions required
                                                                                for process vents
                                                                                under this subpart
                                                                                supersede the
                                                                                emission reductions
                                                                                required for process
                                                                                vents under subpart U
                                                                                of this part; and
                                                                                (d) you must collect
                                                                                CPMS data during the
                                                                                period of the initial
                                                                                compliance
                                                                                demonstration and
                                                                                determine the CPMS
                                                                                operating limit
                                                                                during the period of
                                                                                the initial
                                                                                compliance
                                                                                demonstration; or
                                                                       (2) carbon         (a) you must measure
                                                                        disulfide and/or   emissions at the
                                                                        hydrogen sulfide   inlet and outlet of
                                                                        CEMS, as           each control device
                                                                        applicable;        using CEMS;
                                                                                (b) you must install,
                                                                                operate, and maintain
                                                                                the CEMS according to
                                                                                the applicable
                                                                                performance
                                                                                specification (PS-7,
                                                                                PS-8, PS-9, or PS-15)
                                                                                of 40 CFR part 60,
                                                                                appendix B; and
                                                                                (c) you must collect
                                                                                CEMS emissions data
                                                                                at the inlet and
                                                                                outlet of each
                                                                                control device during
                                                                                the period of the
                                                                                initial compliance
                                                                                demonstration and
                                                                                determine the CEMS
                                                                                operating limit
                                                                                during the period of
                                                                                the initial
                                                                                compliance
                                                                                demonstration.
3. the sum of all solvent        a. each existing   i. measure         (1) EPA Method 18  (a) you must conduct
 coating process vents.           or new             toluene            in appendix A-6    testing of emissions
                                  cellophane         emissions.         to part 60 of      at the inlet and
                                  operation.                            this chapter, or   outlet of each
                                                                        Method 320 in      control device;
                                                                        appendix A to
                                                                        part 63, or
                                                                                (b) you may use EPA
                                                                                Method 18 or 320 to
                                                                                determine the control
                                                                                efficiency of any
                                                                                control device for
                                                                                organic compounds;
                                                                                for a combustion
                                                                                device, you must use
                                                                                only HAP that are
                                                                                present in the inlet
                                                                                to the control device
                                                                                to characterize the
                                                                                percent reduction
                                                                                across the combustion
                                                                                device;
                                                                                (c) you must conduct
                                                                                testing of emissions
                                                                                from continuous
                                                                                solvent coating
                                                                                process vents and
                                                                                combinations of batch
                                                                                and continuous
                                                                                solvent coating
                                                                                process vents at
                                                                                normal operating
                                                                                conditions, as
                                                                                specified in Sec.
                                                                                Sec.   63.7(e)(1) and
                                                                                63.5535;

                                                                                (d) you must conduct
                                                                                testing of emissions
                                                                                from batch solvent
                                                                                coating process vents
                                                                                as specified in Sec.
                                                                                63.490(c), except
                                                                                that the emission
                                                                                reductions required
                                                                                for process vents
                                                                                under this subpart
                                                                                supersede the
                                                                                emission reductions
                                                                                required for process
                                                                                vents under subpart U
                                                                                of this part; and
                                                                                (e) you must collect
                                                                                CPMS data during the
                                                                                period of the initial
                                                                                compliance
                                                                                demonstration and
                                                                                determine the CPMS
                                                                                operating limit
                                                                                during the initial
                                                                                compliance
                                                                                demonstration; or
                                                                       (2) ASTM D6420-99  (a) you must conduct
                                                                                testing of emissions
                                                                                at the inlet and
                                                                                outlet of each
                                                                                control device;
                                                                                (b) you may use ASTM
                                                                                D6420-99 (available
                                                                                for purchase from at
                                                                                least one of the
                                                                                following addresses:
                                                                                100 Barr Harbor
                                                                                Drive, West
                                                                                Conshohocken, PA
                                                                                19428-2959; or
                                                                                University Microfilms
                                                                                International, 300
                                                                                North Zeeb Road, Ann
                                                                                Arbor, MI 48106) as
                                                                                an alternative to EPA
                                                                                Method 18 only where:
                                                                                the target
                                                                                compound(s) are those
                                                                                listed in Section 1.1
                                                                                of ASTM D6420-99; and
                                                                                the target
                                                                                concentration is
                                                                                between 150 parts per
                                                                                billion by volume
                                                                                (ppbv) and 100 ppmv;
                                                                                for target
                                                                                compound(s) not
                                                                                listed in Section 1.1
                                                                                of ASTM D6420-99, but
                                                                                potentially detected
                                                                                by mass spectrometry,
                                                                                the additional system
                                                                                continuing
                                                                                calibration check
                                                                                after each run, as
                                                                                detailed in Section
                                                                                10.5.3 of the ASTM
                                                                                method, must be
                                                                                followed, met,
                                                                                documented, and
                                                                                submitted with the
                                                                                data report even if
                                                                                there is no moisture
                                                                                condenser used or the
                                                                                compound is not
                                                                                considered water
                                                                                soluble; and for
                                                                                target compound(s)
                                                                                not listed in Section
                                                                                1.1 of ASTM D6420-99
                                                                                and not amenable to
                                                                                detection by mass
                                                                                spectrometry, ASTM
                                                                                D6420-99 does not
                                                                                apply;
                                                                                (c) you must conduct
                                                                                testing of emissions
                                                                                from continuous
                                                                                solvent coating
                                                                                process vents and
                                                                                combinations of batch
                                                                                and continuous
                                                                                solvent coating
                                                                                process vents at
                                                                                normal operating
                                                                                conditions, as
                                                                                specified in Sec.
                                                                                Sec.   63.7(e)(1) and
                                                                                63.5535;
                                                                                (d) you must conduct
                                                                                testing of emissions
                                                                                from batch solvent
                                                                                coating process vents
                                                                                as specified in Sec.
                                                                                63.490(c), except
                                                                                that the emission
                                                                                reductions required
                                                                                for process vents
                                                                                under this subpart
                                                                                supersede the
                                                                                emission reductions
                                                                                required for process
                                                                                vents under subpart U
                                                                                of this part; and,
                                                                                (e) you must collect
                                                                                CPMS data during the
                                                                                period of the initial
                                                                                compliance
                                                                                demonstration and
                                                                                determine the CPMS
                                                                                operating limit
                                                                                during the period of
                                                                                the initial
                                                                                compliance
                                                                                demonstration.
4. the sum of all cellulose      a. each existing   i. measure total   (1) EPA Method 18  (a) you must conduct
 ether process vents.             or new cellulose   organic HAP        in appendix A-6    testing of emissions
                                  ether operation.   emissions.         to part 60 of      at the inlet and
                                                                        this chapter or    outlet of each
                                                                        Method 320 in      control device;
                                                                        appendix A to     (b) you may use EPA
                                                                        part 63, or        Method 18 or 320 to
                                                                                determine the control
                                                                                efficiency of any
                                                                                control device for
                                                                                organic compounds;
                                                                                for a combustion
                                                                                device, you must use
                                                                                only HAP that are
                                                                                present in the inlet
                                                                                to the control device
                                                                                to characterize the
                                                                                percent reduction
                                                                                across the combustion
                                                                                device;

                                                                                (c) you must conduct
                                                                                testing of emissions
                                                                                from continuous
                                                                                cellulose ether
                                                                                process vents and
                                                                                combinations of batch
                                                                                and continuous
                                                                                cellulose ether
                                                                                process vents at
                                                                                normal operating
                                                                                conditions, as
                                                                                specified in Sec.
                                                                                Sec.   63.7(e)(1) and
                                                                                63.5535;
                                                                                (d) you must conduct
                                                                                testing of emissions
                                                                                from batch cellulose
                                                                                ether process vents
                                                                                as specified in Sec.
                                                                                63.490(c), except
                                                                                that the emission
                                                                                reductions required
                                                                                for process vents
                                                                                under this subpart
                                                                                supersede the
                                                                                emission reductions
                                                                                required for process
                                                                                vents under subpart U
                                                                                of this part; and
                                                                                (e) you must collect
                                                                                CPMS data during the
                                                                                period of the initial
                                                                                performance test and
                                                                                determine the CPMS
                                                                                operating limit
                                                                                during the period of
                                                                                the initial
                                                                                performance test;
                                                                       (2) ASTM D6420-99  (a) you must conduct
                                                                                testing of emissions
                                                                                at the inlet and
                                                                                outlet of each
                                                                                control device;
                                                                                (b) you may use ASTM
                                                                                D6420-99 (available
                                                                                for purchase from at
                                                                                least one of the
                                                                                following addresses:
                                                                                100 Barr Harbor
                                                                                Drive, West
                                                                                Conshohocken, PA
                                                                                19428-2959; or
                                                                                University Microfilms
                                                                                International, 300
                                                                                North Zeeb Road, Ann
                                                                                Arbor, MI 48106) as
                                                                                an alternative to EPA
                                                                                Method 18 only where:
                                                                                the target
                                                                                compound(s) are those
                                                                                listed in Section 1.1
                                                                                of ASTM D6420-99; and
                                                                                the target
                                                                                concentration is
                                                                                between 150 ppbv and
                                                                                100 ppmv; for target
                                                                                compound(s) not
                                                                                listed in Section 1.1
                                                                                of ASTM D6420-99, but
                                                                                potentially detected
                                                                                by mass spectrometry,
                                                                                the additional system
                                                                                continuing
                                                                                calibration check
                                                                                after each run, as
                                                                                detailed in Section
                                                                                10.5.3 of the ASTM