[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 130 (Tuesday, July 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 40632]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14526]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EL20-55-000, QF15-28-001, QF15-29-001]

CF CVEC Owner One LLC; Notice of Petition for Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on June 26, 2020, pursuant to Rule 207 of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207 (2019), CF CVEC Owner One LLC on behalf
of CF Katama LLC and CF Nunnepog LLC (Petitioner) hereby submits a
petition for declaratory order (Petition) requesting that the
Commission issue a declaratory order granting limited waiver, or to the
extent necessary remedial relief, of the filing requirements applicable
to small power production facilities, as more fully explained in the
petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Petitioner.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the
eLibrary link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the document. At this time, the
Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public Reference
Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency concerning
the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the President on
March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free, (886) 208-
3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at
http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically may mail
similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in
docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services,
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on July 27, 2020.

    Dated: June 30, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-14526 Filed 7-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 13, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 115)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33665-33666]
[DOCID:fr13jn08-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0328; Airspace Docket No. 08-ASW-4]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Hinton, OK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date of the direct final
rule that establishes Class E airspace at Hinton, OK, published in the
Federal Register March 26, 2008 (73 FR 15881), Docket No. FAA-2008-
0328, Airspace Docket No. 08-ASW-4.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC June 5, 2008. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
Title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary A. Mallett, Central Service
Center, Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration,
Southwest Region, Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0530; at telephone (817) 222-
4949.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    The FAA published a direct final rule with request for comments in
the Federal Register March 26, 2008 (73 FR

9452), Docket No. FAA-2008-0328, Airspace Docket No. 08-ASW-4,
establishing Class E airspace at Hinton, OK. The FAA uses the direct
final rule procedure for non-controversial rules where the FAA believes
that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule
advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that
unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to
submit an adverse comment, was received within the comment period, the
regulation would become effective on June 5, 2008.
    No adverse comments were received; thus, this notice confirms that
the direct final rule will become effective on this date.
    Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet or more above
the surface of the earth are published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9R, signed August 1, 2007, and effective September 15, 2007, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.
* * * * *

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 28, 2008.
Ronnie L. Uhlenhaker,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. E8-12906 Filed 6-12-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 133 (Thursday, July 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37318-37319]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15057]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 15021-000]

Bard College, New York; Notice of Application Ready for
Environmental Analysis and Soliciting Comments, Recommendations, and
Terms and Conditions

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Exemption from Licensing.
    b. Project No.: 15021-000.
    c. Date filed: December 23, 2019.
    d. Applicant: Bard College, New York.
    e. Name of Project: Annandale Micro Hydropower Project (Annandale
Project).
    f. Location: On Saw Kill, a tributary of the Hudson River, in the
Town of Red Hook, Dutchess County, New York. The project does not
occupy federal land.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of
1978, 16 U.S.C. 2705, 2708 (2018), amended by the Hydropower Regulatory
Efficiency Act of 2013, Public Law 113-23, 127 Stat. 493 (2013).
    h. Applicant Contact: Randy Clum, Director, Buildings and Grounds,
Bard College, 30 Campus Road, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504; and/or
Joel Herm/Jan Borchert, Current Hydro, Inc., P.O. Box 224, Rhinebeck,
NY 12572.
    i. FERC Contact: Monir Chowdhury,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, recommendations, and terms and
conditions: 60 days from the issuance date of this notice; reply
comments are due 105 days from the issuance date of this notice.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, recommendations, and terms and conditions using the
Commission's eFiling system at https://ferconline.ferc.gov/FERCOnline.aspx. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000
characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at
https://ferconline.ferc.gov/QuickComment.aspx. You must include your
name and contact information at the end of your comments. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, you may submit a paper copy.
Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service must be addressed

to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426. Submissions sent
via any other carrier must be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue,
Rockville, Maryland 20852. The first page of any filing should include
docket number P-15021-000.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
interveners filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person on the official service list for the
project. Further, if an intervener files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. This application has been accepted and is ready for
environmental analysis at this time.
    The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) issued a final rule on
July 15, 2020, revising the regulations under 40 CFR parts 1500-1518
that federal agencies use to implement the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) (see Update to the Regulations Implementing the
Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act, 85 FR
43,304). The Final Rule became effective on and applies to any NEPA
process begun after September 14, 2020. An agency may also apply the
regulations to ongoing activities and environmental documents begun
before September 14, 2020, which includes the proposed Annandale
Project. Commission staff intends to conduct its NEPA review in
accordance with CEQ's new regulations.
    l. Project Description: The Annandale Project would consist of: (1)
An existing 240-foot-long dam with a maximum height of 13 feet
impounding a 3-acre reservoir at a normal pool elevation of 148 feet
North American Vertical datum of 1988; (2) one new 9-foot-wide, 9-foot-
long, 8-foot-high concrete tank with a spiral internal shape and
housing a 10-kilowatt gravitational vortex turbine-generator unit; (3)
a new 60-foot-long, 480-volt underground generator lead connecting the
turbine-generator unit with an electrical panel that is connected to a
step-up transformer via a new 10-foot-long, 480-volt underground
transmission line; (4) a new 50-foot-long, 7.6-kilovolt underground
transmission line connecting the step-up transformer to the local grid;
and (5) appurtenant facilities. The project is estimated to generate an
average of 51 megawatt-hours annually. The applicant proposes to
operate the project in a run-of-river mode.
    m. A copy of the application can be viewed on the Commission's
website at https://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online
Support.
    All filings must (1) bear in all capital letters the title
``COMMENTS,'' ``REPLY COMMENTS,'' ``RECOMMENDATIONS,'' or ``TERMS AND
CONDITIONS;'' (2) set forth in the heading the name of the applicant
and the project number of the application to which the filing responds;
(3) furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the person
submitting the filing; and (4) otherwise comply with the requirements
of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All comments, recommendations, and
terms and conditions must set forth their evidentiary basis and
otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may
obtain copies of the application directly from the applicant. Each
filing must be accompanied by proof of service on all persons listed on
the service list prepared by the Commission in this proceeding, in
accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    n. Public notice of the filing of the initial development
application, which has already been given, established the due date for
filing competing applications or notices of intent. Under the
Commission's regulations, any competing development application must be
filed in response to and in compliance with public notice of the
initial development application. No competing applications or notices
of intent may be filed in response to this notice.
    o. With this notice, we are initiating informal consultation with
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and NOAA Fisheries under section 7
of the Endangered Species Act and the joint agency regulations
thereunder at 50 CFR part 402; and NOAA Fisheries under section 305(b)
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and
implementing regulations at 50 CFR 600.920. We are also initiating
consultation with the New York State Historic Preservation Officer, as
required by section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, and
the implementing regulations of the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation at 36 CFR 800.2.
    p. Updated procedural schedule and final amendments: The
application will be processed according to the following procedural
schedule. Revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deadline for Filing Comments,             September 2021.
 Recommendations, and Agency Terms and
 Conditions/Prescriptions.
Deadline for Filing Reply Comments......  October 2021.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    q. Final amendments to the application must be filed with the
Commission no later than 30 days from the issuance date of the notice
of ready for environmental analysis.

    Dated: July 9, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-15057 Filed 7-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 21, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12259-12260]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05688]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 4

[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0424]

Immediately in Effect Guidance for Industry; Compliance Policy
for Combination Product Postmarketing Safety Reporting; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notification of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing the
availability of an immediately in effect guidance for industry entitled
``Compliance Policy for Combination Product Postmarketing Safety
Reporting.'' This guidance describes FDA's compliance policy for
combination product applicants and constituent part applicants and
activities under FDA regulations that addresses combination product
postmarketing safety reporting. This guidance is immediately in effect,
but it remains subject to comment in accordance with the Agency's good
guidance practices.

DATES: The announcement of the guidance is published in the Federal
Register on March 21, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit either electronic or written comments on
Agency guidances at any time as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2008-N-0424 for ``Compliance Policy for Combination Product
Postmarketing Safety Reporting.'' Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential
Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at
the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
    Submit written requests for single copies of the guidance to the
Office of Combination Products, Food and Drug Administration, Bldg. 32,
Rm. 5129, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993. Send one
self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Burns, Office of Combination

Products, Food and Drug Administration,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of an immediately in effect
guidance for industry entitled ``Compliance Policy for Combination
Product Postmarketing Safety Reporting.'' This guidance describes FDA's
compliance policy for combination product applicants and constituent
part applicants and activities under 21 CFR part 4, subpart B, which
was published in the Federal Register of December 20, 2016 (81 FR
92603) and addresses postmarketing safety reporting for combination
products. We are issuing this guidance consistent with our good
guidance practices (GGP) regulation (Sec.  10.115 (21 CFR 10.115)). We
are implementing this guidance without prior public comment, because we
have determined that prior public participation is not feasible or
appropriate (see section 701(h)(1)(C)(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 371(h)(1)(C)(i)) and Sec.  10.115(g)(2)). We
made this determination because FDA needs to communicate its compliance
policy in a timely manner given the upcoming compliance deadlines for
certain provisions in 21 CFR part 4, subpart B, and the amount of time
needed for firms to prepare for them. Although this guidance is
immediately effective, it remains subject to comment in accordance with
FDA's GGP regulation.
    Published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is
announcing the availability of the draft guidance entitled
``Postmarketing Safety Reporting for Combination Products.''
    This guidance represents the current thinking of FDA on this topic.
It does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on
FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies
the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. This
guidance is not subject to Executive Order 12866.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collections of information in 21 CFR 314.80(c) and (e), as well as for
21 CFR 314.81(b) are approved under OMB control numbers 0910-0001,
0910-0230, and 0910-0291. The information collection provisions for 21
CFR 600.80 and 600.81 are approved under OMB control number 0910-0308.
Those for 21 CFR 606.170 are approved under OMB control number 0910-
0116. Those for 21 CFR 606.171 are approved under OMB control number
0910-0458. The information collection provisions for 21 CFR 803.50,
803.53, and 803.56 are approved under OMB control numbers 0910-0291 and
0910-0437. The information collection provisions for 21 CFR 806.10 and
806.20 are approved under OMB control number 0910-0359. The information
collection provisions for Sec. Sec.  4.102, 4.103, and 4.105 are
approved under OMB control number 0910-0834.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the internet may obtain the guidance at
either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or
https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: March 15, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-05688 Filed 3-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 20, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16172-16174]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6588]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 67

[Docket No. USCG-2010-1124]

Application for Foreign Rebuilding Determination

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability and response to comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 25, 2011, the Coast Guard published a document
seeking comments on a petition for rulemaking to amend the Coast Guard
regulation concerning foreign-rebuilt determinations for vessels
entitled to a coastwise trade endorsement. Under the Jones Act, to
maintain a coastwise trade endorsement, a vessel must not be rebuilt
outside the United States. This document responds to the comments we
received on our February 25, 2011 request for comments, and announces
the availability of our response to the petitioners denying their
petition.

DATES: On March 13, 2012, the Coast Guard denied the December 9, 2010
petition to amend 46 CFR 67.177.

ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this document as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2010-1124 and are available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this
docket online by going to http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG-2010-1124 in the ``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
document, call or email Lieutenant Commander Erin Ledford, Executive
Secretary, Maritime Safety and Security Council, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have
questions on viewing material in the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    In a petition dated December 9, 2010, Marc J. Fink, on behalf of a
coalition of maritime organizations, petitioned the Coast Guard to
amend 46 CFR 67.177, Application for foreign rebuilding determination.
On February 25, 2011, we published a document in the Federal Register
(76 FR 10553) seeking comments on that petition for rulemaking.
    The regulation the petition seeks to amend sets the parameters for
rebuilt-foreign determinations and directs when vessels with coastwise
trade endorsements whose hulls or superstructure are altered outside
the United States must submit a written statement to the National
Vessel Documentation Center. Section 67.177 also states when vessel
owners considering such alterations may seek a preliminary rebuilt
determination.
    Under 46 U.S.C. 12132(b), to maintain a coastwise endorsement a
vessel must not be rebuilt outside the United States. For definitions
of ``coastwise endorsement'' and ``rebuilt in the United States,'' see
46 U.S.C. 12101.
    We received five submissions in response to our February 25, 2011
request for comments, and have responded to these comments below. After
considering these comments we responded to the petitioners in a letter.
    As reflected in that letter, we concluded that amendments to 46 CFR
67.177 are neither needed nor desired, and therefore we denied the
petition. The petition and its three exhibits, along with our letter
responding to the petition, are available in the docket as indicated
under ADDRESSES.

Discussion of Comments

    All five submissions to the docket in response to our February 25,
2011 document, including a submission from the petitioners, supported
the petition. Four of the five specifically requested that that we move
forward expeditiously with a rulemaking in order to clarify what types
and amounts of foreign shipyard work on vessels are allowed under the
Merchant Marine Act of 1920, known as the Jones Act, 41 Stat. 988, c.
250; see specifically 46 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  12101, 12112, 12132(b), and
55102.
    In their submission in response to the request for comments, the
petitioners stated that amending Sec.  67.177 is necessary to resolve a
number of industry disputes over what types and amounts of foreign
shipyard work on vessels are and are not permissible under the Jones
Act. The petitioners also stated that amending Sec.  67.177 as they
proposed would be beneficial because this regulation would then--
     Specifically define ``major component,'' and thus clarify
what constitutes a major component.
     Establish clear and uniform guidance to the industry
regarding the Coast Guard's standards for determining when certain work
on a vessel in a foreign shipyard constitutes a rebuilding of that
vessel pursuant to the Second Proviso to the Jones Act.
     Resolve ambiguities and open questions in the current
rules that are currently left unanswered by mixed court decisions,
including what is the relationship between the ``major component'' test
and the ``considerable part'' test.
    A shipyard company stated that a definition of what constitutes a
major component is needed for purposes of determining whether a vessel
is rebuilt, and of when subassemblies individually added to a vessel
become, in totality, a major component. This company noted that the
existing discretionary rebuild test of 7.5 to 10 percent of hull or
superstructure steel weight is ambiguous when applied to a vessel
modification for purposes of evaluating compliance with the Jones Act,
and that amending this provision to establish a single threshold for
applying the rebuild test will significantly improve the conflicting
interpretations of compliance that currently exist.
    The Coast Guard believes that, as a result of the recent decision
of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Shipbuilders Council of
America v. U.S. Coast Guard, 578 F.3d 234 (2009) involving the SEABULK
TRADER, certainty and predictability have been achieved on the foreign
rebuild regulation, and particularly its major component test and the
relationship between that test and the corresponding ``considerable
part test''. The Coast Guard believes there is now a settled
understanding of the interpretation of 46 CFR 67.177 to a greater
degree than there has been over the course of many years of attempts to
address this contentious issue.
    The Coast Guard notes that the current regulation was promulgated
after controversy surrounding the previous attempt to regulate on this
subject. That previous regulation--46 CFR 67.27-3, Required application
for rebuilt determination (1988)--was challenged in court and
overturned in 1989. See American Hawaii Cruises v. Skinner, 713 F.Supp.
452 (D.D.C. 1989). The current regulation was then issued in 1996, in
response to that successful challenge. See 60 FR 17290, April 5, 1995,
and 61 FR 17814, April 22, 1996. However, it was also challenged in
court in the SEABULK TRADER case in 2006, with initial success at the
District Court level. See Shipbuilders Council of America v. U.S. Dept.
of Homeland Sec., 551 F.Supp.2d 447 (E.D.Va. 2008). But this time the
Fourth Circuit Court of

Appeals reversed that District Court decision and held, instead, that
the Coast Guard's ``interpretive scheme has the great virtue of
construing each provision of the regulation to have functional
significance'' and, further, that its interpretation ``offers a
holistic vision of the regulation that gives effect to each of its
provisions.'' Id. at 245. Thus, the current regulation now enjoys the
strong imprimatur of support, giving rise to certainty and
predictability in its interpretation, by a Court of Appeals of the
United States.
    The petitioners may disagree with the substance and effect that the
clarity established by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has
revealed. However, the changes sought by the petition would, in the
name of clarity, change the substantive outcomes of Coast Guard
determinations and upset a regulatory regime that has been in place
since 1996.
    Prior to the decision by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, and
the Coast Guard determinations that it affirmed, the foreign rebuild
regulation may have appeared to some to be less than clear. However,
that lack of clarity related less to the lack of a definition of
``major component,'' which is the centerpiece of petitioners' proposal,
and more so to a structural tension in the rule itself; specifically,
the uneasy combination of a quantitative test (the considerable part
test) with a qualitative test (the major component test). The Fourth
Circuit Court of Appeals examined the Coast Guard's balancing of these
tests and, as noted above, found that the Coast Guard's interpretive
scheme had resolved those tensions.
    For example, among the items deemed by petitioner's proposed rule
to be major components are container racks. Even by petitioner's
definition, major components are components of the hull or
superstructure of a vessel. However, ``hull'' and ``superstructure''
remain defined terms at 46 CFR 67.3 and, in both cases, the central
characteristic for any item to be considered a component of either is
that it be structural in nature. It has long been the case that
container racks (excluding their foundations, pedestals or required
reinforcements) have been determined by the Coast Guard National Vessel
Documentation Center (NVDC), aided with technical support from naval
architects and marine engineers at the Coast Guard Naval Architecture
Division (NAD), to be non-structural ``outfit.'' As such, they would be
and have been excluded from consideration under the major component
test as well as, for that matter, from the calculation of the
considerable part test. For a recent analysis of the structural or non-
structural nature of container racks see the NVDC's U.S. build
determination letter dated August 1, 2011, and accompanying analysis of
the NAD dated July 15, 2011, in the case of a NASSCO flat-deck
container barge, both of which are now posted on the NVDC Web site,
http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/nvdc/, under ``Latest News''.
    Consequently, while apparently retaining the requirement that major
components must be structural components of the hull or superstructure,
petitioners would nevertheless, as part of the same definition,
specifically deem an item, long-established by expert analysis to be
non-structural in nature, to be a major component. Including this
specific item (the container rack) as a major component in the
definition by regulatory fiat, would be inconsistent with Coast Guard
prior practice; it would also be inconsistent with the proposed rule
itself. While acknowledging the requirement that major components of
the hull and superstructure must, at the very least, have a structural
characteristic, the proposal would completely revamp that basic
understanding.
    The petitioners' proposed amendments, in the name of clarity, seek
to re-balance the ``holistic approach'' found to characterize the
current rule and its interpretation by the Fourth Circuit Court of
Appeals. By expanding the definition of ``major component'' it would
give significantly greater weight to the major component test over the
considerable part test. The reason for this effect is that the
steelweight percentage threshold for an item to be considered a major
component is 1.5 percent, while the steelweight percentage threshold of
the considerable part test (even if amended as the petitioners'
propose) is 10 percent. Consequently, by expanding the scope of what
would be deemed a major component, it would become far more likely that
proposed foreign work would be barred by that 1.5 percent threshold
without even having to take into account the 10 percent threshold.
    The NVDC's regulatory interpretations have been quite clear and
consistent. In making its determinations, it considers the greater of
steel added or steel removed. This is the conservative middle ground
between those in industry who have advocated, on the one hand, that we
consider both steel added and steel removed, and those who have
advocated, on the other hand, that we consider only the net of steel
added and steel removed.
    The petitioners' proposed amendments would introduce other
substantive changes. For example, the Coast Guard believes that none of
the determinations leading up to the increase in Agency appeals,
litigation and Court appeals of the last few years (including the
MOKIHANA, SEABULK TRADER, SEABULK CHALLENGE, DELAWARE TRADER,
PHILADELPHIA and NEW YORK) would be decided the same way under the
petitioners' proposed amendments.
    In addition, petitioner's proposal would establish new and onerous
procedural impediments to any applicant seeking to have work done at a
foreign shipyard. Their proposal would make the process slower, more
cumbersome, inflexible, conducive to adversarial disputes and appeals
by third parties--whether or not directly affected, and more resource-
intensive for the Coast Guard.
    For example, new determinations would be required as to whether
proposed work was, or was not, casualty-related as well as whether no
shipyard in the United States is capable or available to perform the
desired work. Notices as to all actions and proposed actions would have
to be posted in the Federal Register. As already mentioned, appeals
would be opened and available to any person, without regard to whether
or not they are directly affected by the determination. The Coast Guard
would be obligated, somehow, to compel parties to enter into protective
orders in connection with those appeals and, of course, it would then
be incumbent upon the Coast Guard to police and enforce violations of
those protective orders.
    Moreover, virtually all applicants consider the information
submitted to the Coast Guard in connection with requests for foreign
rebuild determinations to be highly proprietary. When those
determinations have been contested in the past, including in all of the
cases already mentioned, they have been contested by direct commercial
competitors of those applicants. Consequently, even a protective order
might not offer sufficient proprietary protection to a potential
applicant.
    The effect of these procedural changes would be to present
additional impediments, and thus, likely discourage potential
applicants from even applying in the first place.
    Finally, because of--
     The substantive re-balancing at the heart of the petition
which would raise the bar (by lowering the applicable steelweight
percentage in most cases) for any foreign work,

     The inclusion of items as major components which have
never before been so included because they represent non-structural
``outfit,''
     The procedural impediments which would have the effect of
discouraging applicants, and
     Other more restrictive measures, such as the proposal to
take into account the weight of both the steel added and the steel
removed rather than the greater of the weight of either the steel added
or the steel removed,
alone or in combination, by amending the current regulation as
petitioners propose may cause other countries to challenge the
continued applicability of the exemption from certain provisions of the
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (``GATT 1994'') that the
Jones Act statutes and regulations currently enjoy.
    The Coast Guard understands that the national treatment obligation
in the GATT 1994 requires the United States to treat imported goods no
less favorably than domestic goods, including with regard to the sale,
lease and use of the goods. Vessels engaged in the coastwise trade are
considered goods for purposes of the GATT 1994.
    The United States has a specific exemption from the national
treatment and certain other obligations of the GATT 1994 for the Jones
Act statutes and measures, such as the Coast Guard regulations
implementing those statutes. That exemption is contained in paragraph 3
of the GATT 1994. Any changes to the Jones Act statutes or measures
implementing those statutes must not make them less consistent with
GATT 1994.
    For a more detailed response to the specific amendments proposed by
the petitioners, please see the March 13, 2012 letter in the docket
responding to the petition for rulemaking. This document is issued
under authority of 33 CFR 1.05-20 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a).

    Dated: March 13, 2012.
F.J. Kenney,
RDML, U.S. Coast Guard, Judge Advocate General, Chairman, Marine Safety
and Security Council.
[FR Doc. 2012-6588 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 55783]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22100]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1888-000]

 York Haven Power Company, LLC; Notice of Authorization for
Continued Project Operation

    On August 30, 2012, the York Haven Power Company, LLC, licensee for
the York Haven Hydroelectric Project, filed an Application for a New
License pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the Commission's
regulations thereunder. The York Haven Hydroelectric Project is located
on the Susquehanna River, in Dauphin, Lancaster and York, Counties,
Pennsylvania.
    The license for Project No. 1888 was issued for a period ending
September 1, 2014. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1),
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue
from year-to-year an annual license to the then licensee under the
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior
license waived the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based
on section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c),
and as set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project
has filed an application for a subsequent license, the licensee may
continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license
expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee
of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent
license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to
continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a
license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 1888 is issued to
the licensee for a period effective September 2, 2014 through September
1, 2015 or until the issuance of a new license for the project or other
disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If issuance of a new
license (or other disposition) does not take place on or before
September 1, 2015, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR
16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is
hereby given that the licensee, York Haven Power Company, LLC, is
authorized to continue operation of the York Haven Hydroelectric
Project, until such time as the Commission acts on its application for
a subsequent license.

    Dated: September 10, 2014.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-22100 Filed 9-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 146 (Monday, August 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 46952]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16420]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER22-2482-000]

25 Mile Creek Windfarm LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
25 Mile Creek Windfarm LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is August 15, 2022.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 26, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-16420 Filed 7-29-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 104 (Thursday, May 30, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32347-32349]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12519]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-1162; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-002-AD;
Amendment 39-17459; AD 2013-10-06]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A330-200 Freighter, A330-200, A330-300, A340-200, A340-
300, A340-500, and A340-600 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by
several reports of a burning smell and/or smoke in the cockpit during
cruise phase leading, in some cases, to diversion to alternate
airports. This AD requires an inspection to identify the installed
windshields and replacement of any affected windshield. We are issuing
this AD to prevent significantly increased workload for the flightcrew,
which could, under some flight phases and/or circumstances, constitute
an unsafe condition.

DATES: This AD becomes effective July 5, 2013.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of July 5, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on November 7, 2012 (77
FR 66760). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which
is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community,
has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2011-0242, dated December 19,
2011 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) states:

    Several operators have reported cases of burning smell and/or
smoke in the cockpit during cruise phase leading in some cases to
diversion.
    Findings have shown that the cause of these events is the
burning of the Saint-Gobain Sully (SGS) windshield connector
terminal block.
    This condition, if not corrected, could significantly increase
the flight crew workload which would, under some flight phases and/
or circumstances, constitute an unsafe condition.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires the
identification of the installed windshields and replacement of the
affected part.
* * * * *
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Revised Service Information

    Since the NPRM (77 FR 66760, November 7, 2012) was published, we
have received the following service information:
     Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-56-3009, Revision
02, including Appendix 01, dated February 8, 2012;
     Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-56-4008, Revision
01, including Appendix 01, dated February 8, 2012; and
     Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-56-5002, Revision
01, including Appendix 01, dated February 8, 2012.

We have determined that these service bulletins do not add any
additional actions to those proposed in the NPRM. Therefore, we have
revised paragraphs (g), (h), and (j) of this AD to refer to these
service bulletins, and have revised paragraph (i) of this AD to provide
credit for actions performed before the effective date of this AD using
the previous revisions of those service bulletins.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received. The Air Line Pilots
Association (ALPA) stated that it supports the NPRM (77 FR 66760,
November 7, 2012).

Request To Revise Applicability

    Airbus requested that the applicability stated in the NPRM (77 FR
66760, November 7, 2012) be revised to state the generic Model ``A330-
200/-300'' and ``A340-500/-600'' series airplanes instead of the
specific airplane models. Airbus stated that the actions of the NPRM
are actually required for all the series airplanes instead of only the
models stated in the NPRM.
    We disagree. The models stated in paragraph (c) of the NPRM (77 FR
66760, November 7, 2012) correspond to the model and series airplanes
validated by the FAA and identified in an FAA type certificate data
sheet (TCDS). Some series airplanes that were identified in the MCAI
are not listed on any FAA TCDS and cannot be imported and placed on the
U.S. register until that model is validated and identified on an FAA
TCDS. If a model identified in the MCAI is identified on an FAA TCDS in
the future, we might consider additional rulemaking. We have not
changed this AD in this regard.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (77 FR 66760, November 7, 2012) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 66760, November 7, 2012).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 55 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $9,350, or $170 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 10 work-hours and require parts costing $0, for a cost of
$850 per product. Where the service information lists required parts
costs that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will
be no charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage
for affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than
estimated here. We have no way of determining the number of products
that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (77 FR 66760, November 7,
2012), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2013-10-06 Airbus: Amendment 39-17459. Docket No. FAA-2012-1162;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-002-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective July 5,
2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and
(c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category, all manufacturer
serial numbers.
    (1) Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, -243F,
-301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes.
    (2) Airbus Model A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312, -313, -541,
and -642 airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 56, Windows.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by several reports of a burning smell and/
or smoke in the cockpit during cruise phase leading, in some cases,
to diversion to alternate airports. We are issuing this AD to
prevent significantly increased workload for the flightcrew, which
could, under some flight phases and/or circumstances, constitute an
unsafe condition.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Inspection

    Within 1,200 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
inspect to identify the manufacturer, the part number, and the
serial number of the left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH) windshields
installed on the airplane, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable Airbus service information identified
in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD. A review of
airplane delivery or maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of
this inspection if the manufacturer, part number, and serial number
of the installed windshields can be conclusively determined from
that review.
    (1) For Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, -243F, -
301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes:
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-56-3009, Revision 02,
including Appendix 01, dated February 8, 2012.
    (2) For Model A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312, and -313
airplanes: Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-56-4008, Revision
01, including Appendix 01, dated February 8, 2012.
    (3) For Model A340-541 and -642 airplanes: Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A340-56-5002, Revision 01, including Appendix 01,
dated February 8, 2012.

(h) Replacement

    If it is found, during the inspection required by paragraph (g)
of this AD, that any installed LH or RH windshield was manufactured
by Saint-Gobain Sully (SGS) and the part number and serial number
are identified in the applicable Airbus service information
identified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD: Within
9 months or 1,200 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, replace all affected LH and RH windshields,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable
Airbus service information identified in paragraph (h)(1), (h)(2),
or (h)(3) of this AD.
    (1) For Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, -243F, -
301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes:
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-56-3009, Revision 02,
including Appendix 01, dated February 8, 2012.
    (2) For Model A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312, and -313
airplanes: Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-56-4008, Revision
01, including Appendix 01, dated February 8, 2012.
    (3) For Model A340-541 and -642 airplanes: Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin

A340-56-5002, Revision 01, including Appendix 01, dated February 8,
2012.

(i) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using the applicable service
information identified in paragraphs (i)(1) through (i)(4) of this
AD, which are not incorporated by reference in this AD.
    (1) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-56-3009, dated May 4, 2010 (for
Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, -243F, -301, -302, -
303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes).
    (2) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-56-3009, Revision 01, dated
January 27, 2011 (for Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -223F, -243,
-243F, -301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343
airplanes).
    (3) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-56-4008, dated May 4, 2010 (for
Model A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312, and -313 airplanes).
    (4) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-56-5002, dated May 4, 2010 (for
Model A340-541 and -642 airplanes).

(j) Parts Installation Limitation

    As of the effective date of this AD, do not install on an
airplane any affected windshield from SGS having a part number and
serial number identified in the applicable service information
identified in paragraphs (j)(1), (j)(2), and (j)(3) of this AD,
unless a suffix ``U'' is present at the end of the serial number.
    (1) For Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, -243F, -
301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes:
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-56-3009, Revision 02,
including Appendix 01, dated February 8, 2012.
    (2) For Model A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312, and -313
airplanes: Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-56-4008, Revision
01, including Appendix 01, dated February 8, 2012.
    (3) For Model A340-541 and -642 airplanes: Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A340-56-5002, Revision 01, including Appendix 01,
dated February 8, 2012.

(k) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(l) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2011-0242,
dated December 19, 2011 (corrected February 15, 2012), and the
service information identified in paragraphs (l)(1)(i) through
(l)(1)(iii) of this AD, for related information.
    (i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-56-3009, Revision 02,
including Appendix 01, dated February 8, 2012.
    (ii) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-56-4008, Revision
01, including Appendix 01, dated February 8, 2012.
    (iii) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-56-5002, Revision
01, including Appendix 01, dated February 8, 2012.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS--Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.

(m) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-56-3009, Revision 02,
including Appendix 01, dated February 8, 2012.
    (ii) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-56-4008, Revision
01, including Appendix 01, dated February 8, 2012.
    (iii) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-56-5002, Revision
01, including Appendix 01, dated February 8, 2012.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS--Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.airbus.com.
    (4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 16, 2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-12519 Filed 5-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


ial dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP Page 621 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 wall dry other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other other other other other other other other other other other other tangential dry Fabric Filter + Wet Scrubber other other other other other other other other other other other other cyclone wet Cold side ESP + Fuel Reburning other other other other other other Page 622 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 other other other other other other other cyclone wet Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP + SCR other other other other cyclone wet Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP other other other other other other other cyclone wet Cold side ESP tangential dry Hot side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other other other other cyclone wet Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP tangential dry Hot side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other other other other other other other other tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP Page 623 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 cyclone wet Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP wall dry tangential dry tangential dry other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other tangential dry tangential dry tangential dry tangential dry tangential dry tangential dry Hot side ESP tangential dry tangential dry wall dry Hot side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other other other other other other other other tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other tangential dry tangential dry tangential dry Page 624 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 tangential dry Hot side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other other other other other other other other other other other other other other dry other dry other dry other dry other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other Page 625 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other Page 626 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other wall dry wall dry other other cyclone wet Hot side ESP + Wet Scrubber cyclone wet Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber tangential wet Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber cyclone wet Hot side ESP cyclone wet Hot side ESP other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other unknown Page 627 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 unknown unknown unknown unknown other other cyclone wet Hot side ESP cyclone wet Hot side ESP cyclone wet Hot side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber tangential dry Fabric Filter cyclone wet Cold side ESP wall wet Cold side ESP + SCR wall wet Cold side ESP + SCR wall wet Cold side ESP + SCR wall wet Cold side ESP + SCR wall wet Cold side ESP + SCR wall wet Hot side ESP unknown unknown vertical dry Cold side ESP vertical dry Cold side ESP vertical dry Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP other other tangential tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential other other other other other other tangential wet tangential wet tangential wet Cold side ESP tangential dry Hot side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown Page 628 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 unknown other tangential dry Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber tangential dry Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber tangential dry Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber tangential dry Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber other other other cyclone wet Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber cyclone wet Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber other wall dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other other other cyclone wet Cold side ESP cyclone wet cyclone wet cyclone wet other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other other other SCR PC unknown Cold side ESP + SCR + Wet Scrubber other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR PC unknown Cold side ESP + SCR + Wet Scrubber Page 629 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR PC unknown Cold side ESP + SCR + Wet Scrubber other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR Page 630 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR PC unknown Cold side ESP + SCR + Wet Scrubber other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR + Wet Scrubber Page 631 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 PC unknown Cold side ESP + SCR + Wet Scrubber other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR Page 632 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 ExistingNOxControl SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 633 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR Low NOx Burner Page 634 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 635 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 636 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 637 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR SNCR Page 638 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR Overfire Air Page 639 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Advanced Overfire Air Page 640 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Advanced Overfire Air Low Excess Air Overfire Air Page 641 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Page 642 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 643 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air Page 644 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 645 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 646 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 647 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Page 648 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Page 649 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 650 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Page 651 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 652 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 653 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air Low NOx Burner SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 654 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Other Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 655 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Low NOx Burner Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Low NOx Burner Not Applicable Fluidized Bed Combustor Fluidized Bed Combustor Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Page 656 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 657 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Low NOx Burner SCR Page 658 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 659 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning SCR Overfire Air Overfire Air Page 660 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air Overfire Air SNCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SNCR SNCR SNCR SNCR Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low Excess Air SNCR Low NOx Burner Page 661 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Not Applicable Low NOx Burner Technology with Close coupled and Separated OFA ( Tangentially fired units only)

Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 662 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR Page 663 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Page 664 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Page 665 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Other Other Other Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 666 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Page 667 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 668 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 669 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 670 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 671 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 672 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 673 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Other Page 674 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 675 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 676 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 677 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 678 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Page 679 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 680 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Page 681 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Overfire Air Page 682 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 683 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SNCR SNCR SNCR SNCR SNCR SNCR Page 684 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SCR Other SCR Page 685 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 686 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air Overfire Air Biased Firing ( alternate burners) Biased Firing ( alternate burners)

Flue Gas Recirculation Biased Firing ( alternate burners) Biased Firing ( alternate burners)

Page 687 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Other Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 688 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Biased Firing ( alternate burners) Biased Firing ( alternate burners) Biased Firing ( alternate burners) Biased Firing ( alternate burners)

Fuel Reburning Low Excess Air Page 689 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Fuel Reburning SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 690 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Overfire Air Low NOx Burner SNCR SNCR SNCR SNCR SNCR Low NOx Burner SNCR Page 691 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR Fuel Reburning Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Flue Gas Recirculation SCR Low NOx Burner SCR Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 692 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Flue Gas Recirculation Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 693 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air SCR SCR SCR SNCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SNCR Low NOx Burner Page 694 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR Low NOx Burner Other Overfire Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 695 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SNCR Low NOx Burner SNCR SNCR Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Page 696 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Page 697 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Flue Gas Recirculation Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 698 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low Excess Air Overfire Air Page 699 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Other Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation SCR SCR Page 700 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning SNCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner SNCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 701 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 702 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SNCR SNCR SNCR SNCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SNCR Overfire Air Page 703 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR SNCR SNCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR Page 704 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SNCR SNCR SCR SNCR SNCR SNCR SCR SCR Page 705 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SNCR SNCR Page 706 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Other Low NOx Burner Other Other Other Other Page 707 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Other Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Page 708 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Other Other Low NOx Burner Overfire Air SCR Overfire Air Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Page 709 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation SCR Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Other Other Other Flue Gas Recirculation Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Advanced Overfire Air Advanced Overfire Air Low Excess Air Page 710 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air Fuel Reburning Biased Firing ( alternate burners) Biased Firing ( alternate burners)

Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Overfire Air Overfire Air Fuel Reburning Flue Gas Recirculation SCR SCR Page 711 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Fuel Reburning Flue Gas Recirculation Low NOx Burner Flue Gas Recirculation Page 712 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR SNCR SCR SCR Flue Gas Recirculation Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 713 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Page 714 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Page 715 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Flue Gas Recirculation Low NOx Burner Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning SNCR Page 716 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR SNCR SNCR SCR SCR Overfire Air SNCR SNCR Page 717 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SNCR SCR SCR SCR Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SCR Page 718 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation SCR SCR Page 719 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR SNCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Flue Gas Recirculation Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Fuel Reburning Low NOx Burner Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Page 720 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 721 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR Page 722 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Other Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Page 723 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Flue Gas Recirculation Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Page 724 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 725 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR Page 726 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR Page 727 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Page 728 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 729 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 730 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR Page 731 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SNCR Page 732 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 733 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 734 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Fluidized Bed Combustor SCR SCR SCR Page 735 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Page 736 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Page 737 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 738 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR SCR Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Page 739 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 740 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR SCR SCR Page 741 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR SNCR SCR Page 742 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR Page 743 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Page 744 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 745 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 746 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 747 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 748 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 749 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low Excess Air Low Excess Air SNCR Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner SCR Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner SNCR SNCR Overfire Air SNCR SNCR Low NOx Burner Page 750 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 751 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Other Other Other SCR Page 752 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner SCR Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 753 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Other Low NOx Burner SCR Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Page 754 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low Excess Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Other Other Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 755 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 756 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Page 757 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 758 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 759 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Other Page 760 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Page 761 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Page 762 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Fuel Reburning Low NOx Burner SCR Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR Page 763 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Biased Firing ( alternate burners)

SCR SCR SCR SCR Fluidized Bed Combustor Fluidized Bed Combustor Page 764 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Low NOx Burner Page 765 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SNCR SNCR Page 766 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 767 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Overfire Air SCR Page 768 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 769 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Page 770 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Page 771 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR Page 772 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 773 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Page 774 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Page 775 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SCR Page 776 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low Excess Air Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Overfire Air Overfire Air SCR SCR Page 777 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air SCR SCR Page 778 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 779 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Fuel Reburning Page 780 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 781 MACT basecase 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Biased Firing ( alternate burners) Biased Firing ( alternate burners)