[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8270-8271]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02894]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC20-34-000.
    Applicants: MATL LLP, BHE U.S. Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Joint Application for Authorization Under Section 203
of the Federal Power Act, et al. of MATL LLP, et al.
    Filed Date: 1/31/20.
    Accession Number: 20200131-5347.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/20.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1355-008.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Notification of Change in Status of Southern
California Edison Company.
    Filed Date: 1/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200130-5251.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/20/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2042-033; ER10-1942-025; ER17-696-013; ER10-
1938-028; ER10-1934-027; ER10-1893-027; ER10-3051-032; ER10-2985-031;
ER10-3049-032; ER11-4369-012; ER16-2218-012; ER10-1862-027.
    Applicants: Calpine Energy Services, L.P., Calpine Construction
Finance Company, LP, Calpine Energy Solutions, LLC, Calpine Power
America--CA, LLC, CES Marketing IX, LLC, CES Marketing X, LLC, Champion
Energy, LLC, Champion Energy Marketing LLC, Champion Energy Services,
LLC, North American Power and Gas, LLC, North American Power Business,
LLC, Power Contract Financing, L.L.C.
    Description: Notification of Change in Status of the Indicated
Calpine MBR Sellers.
    Filed Date: 1/31/20.
    Accession Number: 20200131-5396.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2854-002.
    Applicants: ConocoPhillips Company.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of ConocoPhillips Company.
    Filed Date: 1/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200130-5252.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/20/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3097-010.
    Applicants: Bruce Power Inc.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Bruce Power
Inc.
    Filed Date: 1/31/20.
    Accession Number: 20200131-5397.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2059-006.
    Applicants: Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Puget Sound
Energy, Inc.
    Filed Date: 1/31/20.
    Accession Number: 20200131-5399.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-849-001; ER18-850-001; ER18-851-001.
    Applicants: Mill Run Windpower LLC, Somerset Windpower LLC, Waymart
Wind Farm LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Market-Based Rate
Status of Mill Run Wind Farm LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 1/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200130-5254.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/20/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-792-001.
    Applicants: Oklahoma Wind, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Oklahoma Wind, LLC Amendment to
Application for MBR Rates to be effective 3/15/2020.
    Filed Date: 2/3/20.
    Accession Number: 20200203-5037.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/24/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-931-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Progress, LLC.
    Description: Application for the Establishment and Recovery of a
Regulatory Asset of Duke Energy Progress, LLC.
    Filed Date: 1/31/20.
    Accession Number: 20200131-5345.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-932-000.
    Applicants: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Filing of Unexecuted NITSA
and NOA between Tri-State and ARPA to be effective 2/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 2/3/20.
    Accession Number: 20200203-5020.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/24/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-933-000.
    Applicants: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Con Edison RY1 1-31-2020 to
be effective 2/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 2/3/20.
    Accession Number: 20200203-5024.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/24/20.
    Docket Numbers: ER20-934-000.
    Applicants: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: WDS Tariff to be effective
2/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 2/3/20.
    Accession Number: 20200203-5026.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/24/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-935-000.

    Applicants: MATL LLP, BHE U.S. Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Request for Negotiated Rate Authority of MATL LLP, et
al.
    Filed Date: 1/31/20.
    Accession Number: 20200131-5349.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-936-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Arkansas, LLC.
    Description: Application to Reduce Nuclear Decommissioning Costs of
Entergy Services, LLC, on behalf of Entergy Arkansas, LLC.
    Filed Date: 1/31/20.
    Accession Number: 20200131-5376.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-937-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original WMPA SA No. 5588;
Queue No. AE2-114 to be effective 1/8/2020.
    Filed Date: 2/3/20.
    Accession Number: 20200203-5097.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/24/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-938-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2020-02-03_Revisions to the
SPP JOA to Improve Clarity of Affected Systems to be effective 4/4/
2020.
    Filed Date: 2/3/20.
    Accession Number: 20200203-5143.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/24/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-939-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance filing per Commission's
9/19/2019 order in EL18-26--Tariff Revisions to be effective 4/6/2020.
    Filed Date: 2/3/20.
    Accession Number: 20200203-5154.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/24/20.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES20-14-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., South Carolina
Generating Company, Inc.
    Description: Application Under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act
for Authorization to Issue Securities of Dominion Energy South
Carolina, Inc., et al.
    Filed Date: 1/30/20.
    Accession Number: 20200130-5253.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/20/20.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 3, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-02894 Filed 2-12-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 247 (Friday, December 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 94386-94388]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30966]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2016-N-4319]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Unique Device
Identification System

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by January
23, 2017.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0720.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.

Unique Device Identification System OMB Control Number 0910-0720--
Extension

    In accordance with the collection of information entitled ``Unique
Device Identification System (UDI),'' medical device labelers, unless
excepted, are required to design and use medical device labels and
device packages that bear a UDI, present dates on labels in a
particular format, and submit data concerning each version or model of
a device to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) no
later than the date the label of the device must bear a UDI. Once a
device becomes subject to UDI requirements, respondents will be
required to update the information reported whenever the information
changes.
    The recordkeeping, reporting, and third-party disclosure
requirements referenced in this document are imposed on any person who
causes a label to be applied to a device, or who causes the label to be
modified, with the intent that the device will be commercially
distributed without any subsequent replacement or modification of the
label. In most instances, the labeler would be the device manufacturer,
but other types of labelers include a specification developer, a
single-use device reprocessor, a convenience kit assembler, a
repackager, or a relabeler. Respondents may also include any private
organization that applies for accreditation by FDA as an issuing
agency.
    FDA has identified the following requirements as having burdens
that must be accounted for under the PRA; the burdens associated with
these requirements are summarized in the table that follows:
    Section 801.18 requires that whenever a labeler of a medical device
includes an expiration date, a date of manufacture, or any other date
intended to be brought to the attention of the user of the device, the
labeler must present the date on the label in a format that meets the
requirements of this section.
    Section 801.20 requires every medical device label and package to
bear a UDI.
    Under Sec.  801.35, any labeler of a device that is not required to
bear a UDI on its label may include a UDI on the label of that device
and utilize the GUDID.
    Under Sec.  801.45, any device that has to be labeled with a UDI
also has to bear a permanent marking providing the UDI on the device
itself if the device is intended for more than one use and intended to
be reprocessed before each use.
    Section 801.50 requires stand-alone software to comply with
specific labeling requirements that identify the software.
    Section 801.55 authorizes additional, case-by-case, labeling
exceptions and alternatives to standard UDI labeling requirements.
    If a labeler relabels or modifies a label of a device that is
required to bear a UDI, under Sec.  830.60 it has to keep a record
showing the relationship of the original device identifier to the new
device identifier.
    Section 830.110 requires an applicant seeking initial FDA
accreditation as a UDI-issuing agency to furnish FDA an application
containing certain information, materials, and supporting
documentation.
    Under Sec.  830.120, an FDA-accredited issuing agency is required
to disclose information concerning its system for the assignment of
UDIs; maintain a list of labelers that use its system for the
assignment of UDIs, and provide FDA a copy of such list; and upon
request, provide FDA with information concerning a labeler that is
employing the issuing agency's system for assignment of UDIs.
    Sections 830.310 and 830.320 require the labeler to provide certain
information to the GUDID concerning the labeler and each version or
model of a device required to be labeled with a UDI, unless the labeler
obtains a waiver.
    Section 830.360 requires each labeler to retain records showing all
UDIs used to identify devices that must be labeled with a UDI and the
particular version or model associated with each device identifier,
until 3 years after it ceases to market a version or model of a device.
    Respondents who are required to submit data to the Agency under
certain other approved information collections (listed below) are
required to include UDI data elements for the device that is the
subject of such information

collection. Addition of the UDI data elements is included in this
burden estimate for the conforming amendments in the following 21 CFR
parts:
     Part 803--Medical Device Reporting (OMB control number
0910-0437).
     Part 806--Medical Devices; Reports of Corrections and
Removals (OMB control number 0910-0359).
     Part 814--Premarket Approval of Medical Devices (OMB
control number 0910-0231).
     Part 820--Quality System Regulation (OMB control number
0910-0073).
     Part 821--Medical Device Tracking Requirements (OMB
control number 0910-0442).
     Part 822--Postmarket Surveillance (OMB control number
0910-0449).
    In the Federal Register of September 16, 2016 (81 FR 63768), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. FDA received one letter in response to the
notice, containing multiple comments.
    (Comment 1) The commenter questioned the practical utility of
certain data elements (``Kit'' and ``Unit of Use DI number'') in the
GUDID and stated that they do not consider them necessary for the
proper performance of FDA's functions.
    (Response 1) Kit is an optional data element in the GUDID. The
respondent may choose not to provide this information. Certain kits may
include individual devices that may not be required to have a UDI. It
is therefore useful to be able to identify whether a device reported in
GUDID is an individual device or a kit. The Unit of Use data element is
used when the base package contains multiple units of the same device.
Although not included on the device label, the Unit of Use DI number
can specifically identify device use on the patient by either pulling
it from AccessGUDID or hospital systems and linking/populating the
information to the patient electronic health record. The UDI
stakeholder community, which includes clinicians, healthcare providers
and labelers, have expressed to us that this is a valuable data element
to be in included in GUDID.
    (Comment 2) The commenter expressed concern that capital or
operating and maintenance costs were excluded from the PRA burden
analysis.
    (Response 2) While we did include an estimate of costs in the
economic analysis of the final rule, this information was not in the
PRA section of the final rule or subsequently, the 60-day notice for
comment on the extension of this information collection. We appreciate
the comment and have included estimated costs of $85.7 million, based
on the economic analysis of the final rule, in our analysis of the
information collection burden. The estimate includes planning and
administration and the costs to integrate the UDI into existing
information systems; to install, test, and validate barcode printing
software; and to train employees. Other significant components of one-
time costs include costs to redesign labels of devices to incorporate
the barcode and date format, and to purchase and install equipment
needed to print and verify the UDI on labels. In addition, labelers
will incur one-time costs for recordkeeping and reporting requirements,
and the direct marking of certain devices. The largest annual cost
components include labor, operating, and maintenance associated with
equipment for printing operations, and labor related to software
maintenance and training needed to maintain the UDI information system.
The total cost, which includes both capital costs and operating and
maintenance costs, has been annualized over 10 years. We have included
the total under capital costs for purposes of this information
collection request.
    (Comment 3) The commenter suggested the following opportunities for
FDA to enhance data quality, utility, and clarity of the information,
including for FDA to:
     Provide data structure information for relevant conforming
amendments;
     clarify how to address challenges of device systems;
     make more timely updates to related FDA databases and
enhance interaction between systems; and
     increase GUDID performance to be more consistent and
predictable.
    Additionally, the commenter suggested additional ways that FDA
could minimize the burden of collection of information if FDA were to
identify PMA supplement numbers through the PMA database, rather than
having the data provided again through GUDID by the labeler.
     More timely updates of Global Medical Device Nomenclature
codes.
     Added transparency regarding logic and validation rule
changes.
     Auto-populating data elements which already reside in
another FDA system.
    (Response 3) These comments continue to be evaluated, but FDA is
making no change to the information collection at this time.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                            Table 1--Estimated Annual Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Total
                                                        Number of       Number of     Total annual    Average burden per    Total hours    operating and
                                                       respondents    responses per   responses \3\  response (in hours)        \5\         maintenance
                                                           \1\       respondent \2\                          \4\                               costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reporting..........................................           6,199              51         316,149     0.023 (1 minute)           7,289        $425,000
Recordkeeping......................................           5,987              51         305,337   0.989 (59 minutes)         302,121      14,733,333
Third-Party Disclosure.............................           5,987              51         305,337   0.885 (53 minutes)         270,143      13,033,333
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Maximum No. of Respondents for any regulatory requirement within each category. Individual regulatory requirements within the category may involve
  fewer respondents.
\2\ Maximum No. of Responses for any regulatory requirement within each category. Individual regulatory requirements within the category may involve
  fewer responses.
\3\ Maximum Total Annual Responses for any regulatory requirement within each category. Individual regulatory requirements within the category may
  involve fewer total annual responses.
\4\ Rounded to three decimals. Total Hours reflects a more precise, non-rounded Average Burden per Response. An approximate (non-rounded) conversion to
  minutes is shown in parentheses.
\5\ Total Hours is based on a more precise Burden per Response than the rounded value shown in this table.

    Dated: December 19, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-30966 Filed 12-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on August 8, 2003

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST 2003-15748

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  AEROZANO, S.A. de C.V.
                              Date Filed:  July 23, 2003

Relief requested:  Exemption from 49 USC section 41301 to permit the
applicant to conduct passenger charter operations between Mexico and the
United States, and other passenger charters in accordance with 14 CFR
Part 212, using small equipment.

Applicant representative:  Humberto Siller, 011 52<PHONE_NUMBER>
DOT analyst:  Allen Brown,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  None.

	DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved
                                               Action date:  August 8,
2003

Effective dates of authority granted:  August 8, 2003, through August 8,
2004

Basis for approval (bilateral agreement/reciprocity):  United
States-Mexico Air Transport Services Agreement of August 15, 1960, as
amended and extended (Agreement).

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the
terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

     X  Standard exemption conditions.

Special conditions/Partial grant/Denial basis/Remarks:  In the conduct
of these operations, the carrier must adhere to all applicable
provisions of the U.S.-Mexico Agreement.  In the conduct of these
operations, the carrier may only use aircraft capable of carrying no
more than 60 passengers and having a maximum payload capacity of no more
than 18,000 pounds (small equipment).  The above grant includes
authority to conduct Third and Fourth Freedom charter operations.  While
we have subjected, consistent with the provisions of the Agreement,
Mexican carriers conducting charter operations with large aircraft to
prior approval or submission of notice for their Third and Fourth
Freedom charters, we determined that any such requirement was not
necessary on public interest grounds in this case, since the carrier
will be conducting these operations solely with small aircraft.  (Other
charter operations to/from the United States under this authority,
however, are subject to prior approval under 14 CFR Part 212.)  Further,
we are continuing to allow Mexican carriers conducting passenger
charters using small equipment to make stopovers in the United States in
the conduct of such operations.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) the applicant was qualified to perform its proposed
operations; (3) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (4) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted/deferred/dismissed, we denied all requests in
the referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this
docume瑮椠⁳癡楡慬汢湯琠敨圠牯摬圠摩敗瑡ഺ瑨
灴⼺搯獭搮瑯朮癯⼯敲潰瑲⽳敲潰瑲彳癡慩楴湯愮灳


October 8, 2007

Robert D. Brenner, Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator

Office of Air and Radiation, Ariel Rios Building

Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20460

RE: Comments on the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone;

Proposed Rule, 72 Fed. Reg. p. 37818-919, July 11, 2007

Dear Mr. Brenner:

On behalf of the over 2,000 member businesses and organizations of the
Asheville Area Chamber of Commerce, we wish to provide the following
comments in response to the EPA’s request for input on proposed
revisions to the current National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
for ozone.

The Asheville Area Chamber of Commerce affirms the vital importance of
good air quality and supports continuing efforts to improve and protect
this invaluable natural resource by appropriate regionally coordinated
action.

The Asheville Area Chamber of Commerce has supported balanced
initiatives to protect both the air quality and the economic health of
families and businesses in our region by partnering with other
organizations to support the NC Clean Smokestacks Act and other
initiatives to reduce pollution. The Chamber recognizes that the air
quality in the Asheville area and in North Carolina is heavily
influenced by air quality pollution sources in the Ohio Valley and
Tennessee Valley Authority areas.

The EPA, state environmental and energy regulators, state legislatures,
and industry have spent years planning and implementing strategies for
how best to implement the nitrogen oxides reductions mandated by current
regulatory programs. According to the EPA, current federal regulations
will significantly reduce ground-level, ozone-causing emissions over the
next two decades.  Under the current rule, emissions from power plants
will be cut in half by 2015, and emissions from cars and trucks will be
reduced by more than 70 percent by 2030.  A revised standard could undo
much of that planning by unraveling the state plans that were crafted to
cost-effectively reduce emissions, and forcing prohibitively expensive
retrofits of control equipment on small, old facilities.

The Asheville Chamber of Commerce recommends that a cost benefit
analysis be applied to any proposed regulation to ensure that a reasoned
and balanced solution is based on sound science, that data is available
for public review, that there is a balance between environmental
protection objectives and the sustainable needs of communities and
business, and laws are enforced fairly and equitably. The Chamber
supports the efforts of the Environmental Protection Agency to focus on
helping our communities meet the current standard.

Sincerely,

Laura Copeland

Vice President, Workforce Development/Public Policy

Asheville Area Chamber of Commerce

P.O. Box 1010

Asheville, NC 28802

(828) 258-6126


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 26, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24594-24595]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09664]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP16-155-000]

Puget Sound Energy, Inc.; Notice of Request Under Blanket
Authorization

    Take notice that on April 13, 2016, Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
(Puget), 10885 NE 4th Street, Bellevue, Washington 98004, filed in
Docket No. CP16-155-000 a prior notice request pursuant to sections
157.205 and 157.216 of the Commission's regulations under the Natural
Gas Act (NGA) as amended, requesting authorization to plug and abandon
fifteen wells and associated surface appurtenances at its Jackson
Prairie Storage Facility (Jackson Prairie) in Lewis County, Washington.
Puget states that the wells proposed for abandonment are not currently
used for injection/withdrawal and the potential for internal and
external corrosion exists. Puget asserts that abandoning these
facilities will reduce the costs associated with ongoing maintenance
and remediation, while improving the overall integrity of the storage
facility. Puget states that the proposed abandonment will have no
effect on Jackson Prairie's certificated parameters and no adverse
impact on Puget's storage service. Puget estimates the cost

of the Project to be approximately $15,461,000, all as more fully set
forth in the application which is on file with the Commission and open
to public inspection. The filing may also be viewed on the web at
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support
at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to
William F. Donahue, Manager, Natural Gas Resources, Puget Sound Energy,
Inc., P.O. Box 94034, Bellevue, WA 98004, by telephone at (425) 456-
2356, or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 60 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to section 157.205 of
the regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to the
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and
not withdrawn within 30 days after the allowed time for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to section 7 of the NGA.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding, or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters, will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and seven copies of the protest or intervention to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.

    Dated: April 20, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-09664 Filed 4-25-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12045-12046]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4602]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2011-0236; FRL-9512-6]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Ferroalloys Production
Area Sources (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR which is abstracted below describes the
nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before March 29,
2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2011-0236, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency,
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center, mail code
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB
at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Learia Williams, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On May 9, 2011 (76 FR 26900), EPA sought comments on this ICR
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any additional
comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days
of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OECA-2011-0236, which is available for public viewing
online at http://www.regulations.gov, in person viewing at the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The
EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number
for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in
the docket that are available electronically. Once in the system,
select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified
above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public
viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, as EPA receives them and without
change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, Confidential
Business Information (CBI), or other information whose public
disclosure is restricted by statute. For further information about the
electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov.
    Title: NESHAP for Ferroalloys Production Area Sources (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2303.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0625.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on March 31, 2012.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
    Abstract: The affected entities are subject to the General
Provisions of the NESHAP at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, and any changes,
or additions to the Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart
YYYYYY.
    Owners or operators of the affected facilities must submit initial
notification, performance tests, and periodic reports and results.
Owners or operators are also required to maintain records of the
occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the
operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the
monitoring system is inoperative.
    All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority. In
the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are
sent directly to the EPA regional office. This information is being
collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart YYYYYY, as
authorized in section 112 and 114(a) of the Clean Air Act. The required
information consists of emissions data and other information that have
been determined to be private.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for the EPA
regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15, and are
identified on the form and/or instrument, if applicable.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 11
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Ferroalloys production area sources
facilities.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 10.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, and annually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 345.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $33,035, which includes $33,035 in
labor costs, no capital/startup costs, and no operation and maintenance
(O&M) costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease in Respondent labor
burden and cost from the most recently approved ICR. The decrease is
due to a reduction in initial compliance costs as existing respondents
are already expected to be in compliance with the regulations. Also,
there is an increase in Agency costs due to an adjustment in labor
rates, which have increased over the past three years and the cost
calculations in this ICR have been updated to reflect the most recent
labor rates.

John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-4602 Filed 2-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P