[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 40606]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16750]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14405-000]

Town of Waterville; Notice of Intent To File License Application,
Filing of Pre-Application Document, and Approving Use of the
Traditional Licensing Process

    a. Type of Filing: Notice of Intent to File License Application and
Request to Use the Traditional Licensing Process.
    b. Project No.: 14405-000.
    c. Date filed: May 7, 2012.
    d. Submitted By: Town of Waterville.
    e. Name of Project: Waterville Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On Kelley River, in the Town of Waterville, Lamoille
County, Vermont. The project would not occupy lands of the United
States.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR 5.3 of the Commission's regulations.
    h. Potential Applicant Contact: Scott Johnson, Town of Waterville
Planning
    Commission, PO Box 31, 850 VT Route 109, Waterville, VT 05492,
(802) 888-5229 Ext. 124<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: Samantha Davidson,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Town of Waterville filed its request to use the Traditional
Licensing Process on May 7, 2012. Town of Waterville provided public
notice of its request on June 6, 2012. In a letter dated July 2, 2012,
the Director of the Division of Hydropower Licensing approved Town of
Waterville's request to use the Traditional Licensing Process.
    k. With this notice, we are initiating informal consultation with:
(a) The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and NOAA Fisheries under section
7 of the Endangered Species Act and the joint agency regulations
thereunder at 50 CFR, Part 402; (b) NOAA Fisheries under section 305(b)
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and
implementing regulations at 50 CFR 600.920; and (c) the Vermont State
Historic Preservation Officer, as required by section 106, National
Historical Preservation Act, and the implementing regulations of the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation at 36 CFR 800.2.
    l. Town of Waterville filed a Pre-Application Document (PAD;
including a proposed process plan and schedule) with the Commission,
pursuant to 18 CFR 5.6 of the Commission's regulations.
    m. A copy of the PAD is available for review at the Commission in
the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site
(http://www.ferc.gov), using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number, excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,
(202) 502-8659. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in paragraph h.
    n. Register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filing and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.

    Dated: July 2, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-16750 Filed 7-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 208)]
[Notices]
[Page 66382-66384]
[DOCID:fr28oc10-48]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0001]

Request for Notification From Industry Organizations Interested
in Participating in the Selection Process for Nonvoting Industry
Representatives on Public Advisory Committees and Panels and Request
for Nonvoting Industry Representatives on Public Advisory Committees
and Panels

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting that any
industry organization interested in participating in the selection of
nonvoting industry representatives to serve on the National Mammography
Quality Assurance Advisory Committee (NMQAAC) and certain device panels
of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee (MDAC) in the Center for
Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) notify FDA in writing. A nominee
may either be self nominated or nominated by an organization to serve
as a nonvoting industry representative. Nominations will be accepted
for current vacancies effective with this notice.

DATES: Any industry organizations interested in participating in the
selection of an appropriate nonvoting member to represent industry
interests must send a letter stating that interest to the FDA by
November 29, 2010, for the vacancies listed in this document.
Concurrently, nomination materials for prospective candidates should be
sent to FDA by November 29, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Send all letters of interest and nominations to Margaret J.
Ames (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret J. Ames, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. 5234, Silver Spring,

MD 20993,<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agency intends to add nonvoting industry
representatives to the following advisory committees:

I. CDRH--Various Committees and Panels

A. National Mammography Quality Assurance Advisory Committee (NMQAAC)

    The Mammography Quality Standards Reauthorization Act of 2004 (Pub.
L. 108-365) requires the addition of at least two industry
representatives with expertise in mammography equipment to the NMQAAC.

B. Medical Devices Advisory Committee (MDAC)

    Section 520(f)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C
Act) (21 U.S.C. 360j(f)(3)), as amended by the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, provides that each medical device panel include one
nonvoting member to represent the interests of the medical device
manufacturing industry.

II. CDRH--Committee and Panels Functions

    FDA is requesting nominations for nonvoting members representing
industry interests for vacancies listed in table 1 of this document as
follows:

    TABLE 1--Nominations Requested for Nonvoting Members Representing
       Industry Interests on Public Advisory Committees and Panels
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Committee name or panel              Approximate date needed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NMQAAC...............................  February 1, 2011.
Anesthesiology and Respiratory         December 1, 2011.
 Therapy Devices Panel.
General and Plastic Surgery Devices    September 1, 2011.
 Panel.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. NMQAAC

    The functions of the NMQAAC are to advise FDA on: (1) Developing
appropriate quality standards and regulations for mammography
facilities; (2) developing appropriate standards and regulations for
bodies accrediting mammography facilities under this program; (3)
developing regulations with respect to sanctions; (4) developing
procedures for monitoring compliance with standards; (5) establishing a
mechanism to investigate consumer complaints; (6) reporting new
developments concerning breast imaging which should be considered in
the oversight of mammography facilities; (7) determining whether there
exists a shortage of mammography facilities in rural and health
professional shortage areas and determining the effects of personnel on
access to the services of such facilities in such areas; (8)
determining whether there will exist a sufficient number of medical
physicists after October 1, 1999; and (9) determining the costs and
benefits of compliance with these requirements.

B. Certain Panels of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee

    The medical device panels perform the following functions: (1)
Review and evaluate data on the safety and effectiveness of marketed
and investigational devices and make recommendations for their
regulation; (2) advise the Commissioner of Food and Drugs (the
Commissioner) regarding recommended classification or reclassification
of these devices into one of three regulatory categories; (3) advise on
any possible risks to health associated with the use of devices; (4)
advise on formulation of product development protocols; (5) review
premarket approval applications for medical devices; (6) review
guidelines and guidance documents; (7) recommend exemption to certain
devices from the application of portions of the FD&C Act; (8) advise on
the necessity to ban a device; (9) respond to requests from the agency
to review and make recommendations on specific issues or problems
concerning the safety and effectiveness of devices; and (10) make
recommendations on the quality in the design of clinical studies
regarding the safety and effectiveness of marketed and investigational
devices.

III. Selection Procedure

    Any industry organization interested in participating in the
selection of an appropriate nonvoting member to represent industry
interests should send a letter stating that interest to the contact
person (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) within 30 days of
publication of this notice. Within the subsequent 30 days, FDA will
send a letter to each organization that has expressed an interest,
attaching a complete list of all such organizations, and a list of all
nominees along with their current r[eacute]sum[eacute]s. The letter
will also state that it is the responsibility of the interested
organizations to confer with one another and to select a candidate,
within 60 days after the receipt of the FDA letter, to serve as the
nonvoting member to represent industry interests for a particular
committee or device panel. The interested organizations are not bound
by the list of nominees in selecting a candidate. However, if no
individual is selected within the 60 days, the Commissioner of Food and
Drugs will select the nonvoting member to represent industry interests.

IV. Qualifications

A. NMQAAC

    Persons nominated for membership as an industry representative on
the NMQAAC must meet the following criteria: (1) Demonstrate expertise
in mammography equipment; and (2) be able to discuss equipment
specifications and quality control procedures affecting mammography
equipment. The industry representative must be able to represent the
industry perspective on issues and actions before the advisory
committee, serve as liaison between the committee and interested
industry parties, and facilitate dialogue with the advisory committee
on mammography equipment issues.

B. MDAC

    Persons nominated for the device panels should be full-time
employees of firms that manufacture products that would come before the
panel, or consulting firms that represent manufacturers, or have
similar appropriate ties to industry.

V. Application Procedure

    Individuals may self nominate and/or an organization may nominate
one or more individuals to serve as a nonvoting industry
representative. Within 30 days, the following information should be
sent to the FDA contact person (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT): A
current curriculum vitae of each nominee, current business and/or home
address, telephone number, e-mail address, and the name of the
committee or device panel of interest. FDA will forward all nominations
to the organizations expressing interest in participating in the
selection process for the committee or panel. (Persons who nominate
themselves as nonvoting industry representatives will not participate
in the selection process).
    FDA has a special interest in ensuring that women, minority groups,
individuals with physical disabilities, and small businesses are
adequately represented on its advisory committees, and therefore,
encourages nominations for appropriately qualified candidates from
these groups.
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5

U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to advisory committees.

    Dated: October 22, 2010.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010-27230 Filed 10-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register: January 12, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 7)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 1159-1164]
[DOCID:fr12ja09-13]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2002-NM-12-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-300, -400, -500, -600,
-700, -700C, -800, and -900, and 747-400 Series Airplanes; and Model
757, 767, and 777 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking; reopening of
comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document revises an earlier supplemental notice of
proposed

rulemaking (NPRM), applicable to certain Boeing Model 737-300, -400, -
500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900, and 747-400 series airplanes;
and Model 757, 767, and 777 airplanes. The first supplemental NPRM
would have required modifying the static inverter by replacing resistor
R170 with a new resistor and relocating the new resistor. This new
action revises the first supplemental NPRM by adding certain airplanes
to the applicability, changing certain airplane groups, and adding
certain part numbers. The actions specified by this second supplemental
NPRM are intended to prevent a standby static inverter from
overheating, which could result in smoke in the flight deck and cabin
and loss of the electrical standby power system. This action is
intended to address the identified unsafe condition.

DATES: Comments must be received by February 6, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2002-NM-12-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057-3356. Comments may be inspected at this
location between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. Comments may be submitted via fax to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Comments may also be sent via the Internet using the following address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments sent via fax or the Internet must
contain ``Docket No. 2002-NM-12-AD'' in the subject line and need not
be submitted in triplicate. Comments sent via the Internet as attached
electronic files must be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 or 2000 or
ASCII text.
    The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Binh V. Tran, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-
4056; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this action may be changed in
light of the comments received.
    Submit comments using the following format:
     Organize comments issue-by-issue. For example, discuss a
request to change the compliance time and a request to change the
service bulletin reference as two separate issues.
     For each issue, state what specific change to the proposed
AD is being requested.
     Include justification (e.g., reasons or data) for each
request.
    Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this action must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 2002-NM-12-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules
Docket No. 2002-NM-12-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356.

Discussion

    A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR part 39) to add an airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to
certain Boeing Model 737-300, -400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and
-900, and 747-400 series airplanes; and Model 757, 767, and 777
airplanes, was published as a supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register on May 26, 2006 (71 FR
30331). The first supplemental NPRM would have required modifying the
static inverter by replacing resistor R170 with a new resistor and
relocating the new resistor. The first supplemental NPRM was prompted
by further evaluation of the carbon resistor, which revealed a failure
mode that can cause the resistor to ignite, involving adjacent
capacitors as well. Those conditions, if not corrected, could result in
smoke in the flight deck and cabin and loss of the electrical standby
power system.

Actions Since Issuance of First Supplemental NPRM

    Since issuance of the first supplemental NPRM, Boeing has revised
the service bulletins listed in the following table:

                        Revised Service Bulletins
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Action             Service bulletin                Model
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification........  Boeing Alert Service      737-300, -400, -500
                       Bulletin 737-24A1166,     series airplanes.
                       Revision 2, dated
                       January 29, 2007.
Modification........  Boeing Alert Service      737-300, -400, -500
                       Bulletin 737-24A1166,     series airplanes.
                       Revision 3, dated July
                       25, 2007.
Modification........  Boeing Service Bulletin   747-400, -400D, -400F
                       747-24-2254, Revision     series airplanes.
                       1, dated March 5, 2007.
Modification........  Boeing Service Bulletin   777-200, -300, -300ER
                       777-24-0095, Revision     series airplanes.
                       1, dated January 3,
                       2007.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The changes in these revisions are minor and no additional work is
necessary for certain airplanes modified by the previous issues.
However, more work is necessary on airplanes with certain static
inverters installed. In addition, the revisions all add airplanes to
those specified in the effectivity or move airplanes to different
groups. Alert

Service Bulletin 737-24A1166, Revision 2, also adds two missing
supplier part numbers, which are related to the existing Boeing part
numbers, for the static inverters. Airplanes that were modified by
installing the correct static inverter having the correct part number,
as specified in Service Bulletin 737-24A1166, Revision 1, dated October
20, 2005, or 747-24-2254, dated July 21, 2005, are not affected by the
modification in the revised service information. Airplanes that were
modified as specified in Service Bulletin 777-24-0095, dated June 30,
2005, are not affected by the modification specified in Revision 1 of
that bulletin. We have changed the second supplemental NPRM to refer to
this revised service information as the appropriate source of service
information for accomplishing the specified modification.
    The revised service bulletins refer to Avionic Instruments Inc.
Service Bulletin 1-002-0102-1000-24-28, Revision B, dated July 24,
2006, as an additional source of service information for modifying the
static inverter.

Comments on First Supplemental NPRM

    Due consideration has been given to the comments received in
response to the first supplemental NPRM.

Support for the First Supplemental NPRM

    The National Transportation Safety Board, Northwest Airlines, and
Alaska Airlines support the intent of the first supplemental NPRM.

Request To Approve Revised Avionic Instruments Inc. (AII) Service
Bulletin

    United Airlines (UA) asks that we approve the latest AII Service
Bulletin 1-002-0102-1000-24-28; Revision A, dated June 22, 2005, was
referenced in the first supplemental NPRM as an additional source of
service information for doing the modification. UA adds that certain
references to service information related to this AD on the Boeing Web
site do not have cross references to the AII service bulletin. UA
suggests that, to avoid confusion, Revision A remain as an additional
source of service information for the rework.
    We agree to leave Revision A of the referenced service bulletin in
the note in the second supplemental NPRM. We have reviewed AII Service
Bulletin 1-002-0102-1000-24-28, Revision B, dated July 24, 2006
(hereafter referred to as the AII service bulletin). We find that both
Revision A and Revision B of the AII service bulletin are still
acceptable as additional sources of service information for modifying
the static inverter. We have changed Note 1 of the second supplemental
NPRM to include Revision B of the service bulletin; Revision A remains
in Note 1.

Request for Work Instructions To Apply To Both Airplane Groups

    UA suggests that the group separation specified in the Work
Instructions in Boeing Service Bulletin 757-24-0110, dated April 28,
2005, be disregarded, and the Group 1 Work Instructions apply to all
airplanes. That service bulletin was referred to in the first
supplemental NPRM as the appropriate source of service information for
accomplishing the modification for Model 757-200, -200CB, -200PF
airplanes. UA states that the Work Instructions are divided into Group
1 and Group 2, based on the inverter part number as delivered
configuration. UA adds that the current Boeing Illustrated Parts
Catalog shows inverter part numbers are applicable to the entire 757
fleet, which conflicts with the purpose of the service bulletin in
separating the Work Instructions into two airplane groups.
    We acknowledge UA's request; however, Boeing has informed us that
Service Bulletin 757-24-0110 will not be revised to incorporate the
requested changes. Under the provisions of paragraph (b) of the second
supplemental NPRM, however, we could consider requests for combining
the Work Instructions if data are submitted to substantiate that using
the Group 1 Work Instructions for all airplanes would provide an
acceptable level of safety. We have made no change to the second
supplemental NPRM in this regard.

Request To Include Certain Part Numbers

    UA states that the FAA response to the comment ``Request for
Clarification of Part Number'' specified in the first supplemental NPRM
indicates that supplier part number 1-001-0102-0265 is not an inverter
part number; UA disagrees with the response. UA adds that Boeing
Illustrated Parts Catalog, for Model 737-300/400/500 and Model 747-400,
indicates that Specification Number S282T004-5 corresponds to both part
numbers 1-001-0102-0265 and 1-002-0102-0265. UA asks that, in order to
avoid confusion, the second supplemental NPRM clarify the existence and
applicability of both part numbers.
    We agree with the request. Revision B of AII Service Bulletin 1-
002-0102-1000-24-28, dated July 24, 2006, includes the subject part
numbers, and we have included Revision B in the second supplemental
NPRM as an additional source of service information for modifying the
static inverter.

Request To Include Future Revisions of Service Information

    Boeing asks that we address imminent revisions of the service
bulletins identified in the first supplemental NPRM, as well as
possible future revisions to any of the identified bulletins. Boeing
states that revisions to the 747 and 777 service bulletins, which will
add several airplanes to the effectivity lists in the bulletins, are
imminent. Boeing notes that, as written, the applicability paragraph in
the first supplemental NPRM will not include the added airplanes.
Boeing suggests the applicability paragraph be changed to read ``* * *
the applicable service bulletin specified in Table 1 of this AD or
subsequent revision(s) to that bulletin.''
    We understand the commenter's concern, and we have included the
revised service information specified under ``Actions Since Issuance of
First Supplemental NPRM,'' which adds airplanes to the applicability
section of this AD. However, we cannot use the phrase, ``or later FAA-
approved revisions'' in an AD because doing so violates Office of the
Federal Register (OFR) regulations for approval of materials
``incorporated by reference'' in rules. In general terms, we are
required by these OFR regulations either to publish the service
document contents as part of the actual AD language; or to submit the
service document to the OFR for approval as ``referenced'' material, in
which case we may refer to such material in the text of an AD. The AD
may refer to the service document only if the OFR approved it for
``incorporation by reference.'' To allow operators to use later
revisions of the referenced documents (issued after publication of the
AD), Boeing or operators must request approval to use later revisions
as an alternative method of compliance with the AD under the provisions
of paragraph (b) of the AD.

Request To Remove Model 747 and 777 Airplanes From the Applicability

    Air Transport Association (ATA), on behalf of its member American
Airlines (AA), and Boeing, asks that we remove Model 747 and 777
airplanes from the applicability of the first supplemental NPRM. ATA
and AA state that we should delete Model 777 airplanes from the
applicability of the first supplemental NPRM because the inverters on
those airplanes have a different configuration and are not

susceptible to the subject unsafe condition. Boeing Safety Review Board
made a finding of ``Not Safety'' for the Model 747 and 777 airplanes.
Boeing adds that there have been no failures on these models, and the
inverters on these models are not running during normal operations.
    We do not agree with the requests. Model 747 and 777 airplanes have
the same type of static inverters that were installed on the airplanes
specified in the first supplemental NPRM. Those static inverters could
overheat at anytime during operation due to a faulty resistor. As
stated in Boeing Service Bulletins 747-24-2254 and 777-24-0095, the
static inverter change will prevent the possible unwanted smoke and
fire from a faulty resistor in the static inverter. Therefore, Model
747 and 777 airplanes will remain in the applicability of the second
supplemental NPRM. We acknowledge that the static inverters are not
running during normal operations, but they could overheat during
emergency operations (standby conditions). However, we have determined
that due to the reduced risk on Model 747 and 777 airplanes, the
compliance time for those airplanes can be extended to 60 months. We
have revised paragraph (a) of this AD accordingly.

Requests To Extend Compliance Time

    ATA, on behalf of its member American Airlines, asks that we extend
the proposed compliance time to 10 years for airplanes on which the AII
service bulletin has been incorporated. AA asks that, due to existing
maintenance intervals, the compliance time be extended to 60 months for
operators that accomplished the first supplemental NPRM. AA adds that
its justification stems from the heat being reduced in the area of the
capacitors C50 and C51, with the resistor R170 on the solder side of
the printed circuit board.
    We do not agree with the request. As stated in ``Actions Since
Issuance of Previous Proposal,'' in the first supplemental NPRM, recent
in-service experience has shown that simply relocating the carbon
composition-style resistor, which was installed in production until
late 1999, did not prevent the overheat condition. Further evaluation
of the carbon resistor has shown a failure mode that can cause the
resistor to ignite. Incorporation of the AII service bulletin will not
mitigate the safety concern. In developing an appropriate compliance
time for this action, we considered the urgency associated with the
subject unsafe condition, the availability of required parts, and the
practical aspect of accomplishing the required modification within a
period of time that corresponds to the normal scheduled maintenance for
most affected operators. According to the manufacturer, an ample number
of required parts will be available to modify the U.S. fleet within the
proposed compliance time. Therefore, we find that 42 months is
sufficient time in which to do the modification. However, according to
the provisions of paragraph (b) of the second supplemental NPRM, we
could approve requests to adjust the compliance time if the request
includes data that prove that the new compliance time would provide an
acceptable level of safety.

Request for Component AD

    AirTran Airways Inc. (AirTran) reiterates the comments under
``Request for a Component AD'' specified in the first supplemental NPRM
and states that this second supplemental NPRM should be a ``component
AD'' rather than an aircraft AD. AirTran states that once an aircraft
delivers from the factory with a component installed, that component is
likely to be replaced due to failure and subsequently installed on
another aircraft outside of the effectivity range. AirTran notes that
it is unrealistic to expect that a component that has qualified
interchangeables will still be installed on the aircraft on which it
was delivered. AirTran states that the AD should be written in a manner
that best ensures the safety of the flying public; this involves
considering how operators use the aircraft and not necessarily how the
manufacturer built the aircraft. AirTran adds that by making the AD
applicable to the part number unit, operators are more likely to
identify all affected units and remove them from their system,
including spares that are not addressed in the first supplemental NPRM,
than if the AD is effective to aircraft line or serial numbers.
    We do not agree with the request. We have confirmed with Boeing
that the service bulletins cited in the applicability list all the
airplanes on which the parts addressed by this AD are eligible for
installation. We have also confirmed with Boeing that the Illustrated
Parts Catalogs have been properly updated. For these reasons, there is
no need to further define the applicability. We have made no change to
the second supplemental NPRM in this regard.

Request To Change Cost Impact Section

    ATA, on behalf of its member American Airlines, asks that the cost
impact section be changed. ATA states that the proposed modification
could be accomplished by either a repair facility or the operator. ATA
adds that the FAA should amend the cost impact to include both of these
alternatives. Both commenters recommend adding 2 hours of labor and the
value of materials for the modification of the inverter to the cost
section.
    We acknowledge the commenters' concerns. We recognize that, in
accomplishing the requirements of any AD, operators might incur
``incidental'' costs in addition to the ``direct'' costs that are
reflected in the cost analysis presented in the AD preamble. However,
the cost analysis in AD rulemaking actions typically does not include
incidental costs.
    Further, because ADs require specific actions to address specific
unsafe conditions (i.e., using a repair facility) they appear to impose
costs that would not otherwise be borne by operators. However, because
of the general obligation of operators to maintain and operate their
airplanes in an airworthy condition, this appearance is deceptive.
Attributing those costs solely to the issuance of this AD is
unrealistic because, in the interest of maintaining and operating safe
airplanes, prudent operators would accomplish the required actions even
if they were not required to do so by the AD. In any case, we have
determined that direct and incidental costs are still outweighed by the
safety benefits of the AD. We have made no change to the second
supplemental NPRM in this regard.

Clarification of Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOC) Paragraph

    We have revised this action to clarify the appropriate procedure
for notifying the principal inspector before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies.

Conclusion

    Since certain changes expand the scope of the first supplemental
NPRM, we have determined that it is necessary to reopen the comment
period to provide additional opportunity for public comment.

Cost Impact

    There are approximately 3,856 airplanes of the affected design in
the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 1,882 airplanes of U.S.
registry would be affected by the second supplemental NPRM. The
following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with the second supplemental NPRM.

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of U.S.-
             Action                    Work hours       Average labor        Parts        Cost per airplane      registered            Fleet cost
                                                        rate per hour                                            airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification....................  Up to 2 hours,                  $80               $0   Between $80 and               1,882   Up to $301,120.
                                   depending on                                           $160.
                                   airplane
                                   configuration.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of
this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in
the future if the second supplemental NPRM were not adopted. The cost
impact figures discussed in AD rulemaking actions represent only the
time necessary to perform the specific actions actually required by the
AD. These figures typically do not include incidental costs, such as
the time required to gain access and close up, planning time, or time
necessitated by other administrative actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Impact

    The regulations proposed herein would not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this proposal would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed
regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact,
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:

Boeing: Docket 2002-NM-12-AD.

    Applicability: This AD applies to the following airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in the applicable Boeing
service bulletin specified in Table 1 of this AD:

                         Table 1--Applicability
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Airplane model                  Boeing service bulletin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900 series  Special Attention Service
 airplanes.                               Bulletin 737-24-1165, Revision
                                          1, dated October 20, 2005.
737-300, -400, -500 series airplanes...  Alert Service Bulletin 737-
                                          24A1166, Revision 3, dated
                                          July 25, 2007.
747-400, -400D, -400F series airplanes.  Service Bulletin 747-24-2254,
                                          Revision 1, dated March 5,
                                          2007.
757-200, -200CB, -200PF series           Special Attention Service
 airplanes.                               Bulletin 757-24-0110, dated
                                          April 28, 2005.
757-300 series airplanes...............  Special Attention Service
                                          Bulletin 757-24-0111, dated
                                          April 28, 2005.
767-200, -300, -300F series airplanes..  Special Attention Service
                                          Bulletin 767-24-0160, dated
                                          June 30, 2005.
767-400ER series airplanes.............  Special Attention Service
                                          Bulletin 767-24-0161, dated
                                          June 30, 2005.
777-200, -300, -300ER series airplanes.  Service Bulletin 777-24-0095,
                                          Revision 1, dated January 3,
                                          2007.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
    To prevent a standby static inverter from overheating, which
could result in smoke in the flight deck and cabin and loss of the
electrical standby power system, accomplish the following:

Modification

    (a) At the time specified in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this
AD, as applicable: Modify the static inverter by removing resistor
R170 from the logic control card assembly and replacing it with a
new resistor, and relocating the new resistor to the solder side of
the printed circuit board in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service bulletin specified in Table 1
of this AD.
    (1) For Model 737, 757, and 767 airplanes: Within 42 months
after the effective date of this AD.
    (2) For Model 747 and 777 airplanes: Within 60 months after the
effective date of this AD.

    Note 1:
    The Boeing service bulletins specified in Table 1 of this AD
refer to Avionic Instruments Inc. Service Bulletins 1-002-0102-1000-
24-28, Revision A, dated June 22, 2005; and Revision B, dated July
24, 2006, as additional sources of service information for
accomplishing the

modification required by paragraph (a) of this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

    (b)(1) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an
appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Seattle ACO.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 18, 2008.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service. 16
 [FR Doc. E9-322 Filed 1-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request Environmental Protection Agency 2. OMB control number b. G None 2060 0395 __ __ __ __

3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. G New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. X Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. X Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. X Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title Exclusion Determinations for New Non road Spark ignited Engines At or Below 19 Kilowatts, New Non road Compressionignited Engines, New Marine Engines, and New On road Heavy Duty Engines ( 40 CFR 85 Subpart R, 40 CFR 89 Subpart A, 40 CFR 90 Subpart J, 40 CFR 91 Subpart K)

8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) EPA ICR No. 1852.02 9. Keywords Exclusions, nonroad, engines, motor vehicle, emission requirements, on road, heavy duty engine 10. Abstract Some types of engines are excluded from compliance with current regulations. A manufacturer may make an exclusion determination by itself; however, manufacturers and importers may routinely request EPA to make such determination to ensure that their determination does not differ from EPA's. Only needed information such as engine type, horsepower rating, intended usage, etc., is requested to make an exclusion determination.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. X Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. G Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 12 b. Total annual responses 12 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 0 % c. Total hours requested 69 d. Current OMB inventory 16 e. Difference 53 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 0 2. Adjustment 53 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) 1 c. Total annualized cost requested 1 d. Current OMB inventory 0 e. Difference 1 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change 0 2. Adjustment 1 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. P Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. Q Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. X Reporting 1. X On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. Q Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. Q Other ( describe)

17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes X No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Nydia Y. Reyes Morales Phone: 202 564 9264 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( I) Why the information is being collected' ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( I) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Gregory A. Green, Director Certification & Compliance Division Office of Transportation & Air Quality Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Environmental Information Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95 Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions 5 CFR 1320.9 reads " As part of the agency submission to OMB of a proposed collection of information, the agency ( through the head of the agency, the Senior Official or their designee) shall certify ( and provide a record supporting such certification) that the proposed collection of information

"( a) is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including that the information to be collected will have practical utility;

"( b) is not unnecessarily duplicative of information otherwise reasonably accessible to the agency;

"( c) reduces to the extent practicable and appropriate the burden on persons who shall provide information to or for the agency, including with respect to small entities, as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U. S. C § 601( 6)), the use of such techniques as:

"( 1) establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to those who are to respond; "( 2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements; or collection of information , or any part thereof; "( 3) an exemption from coverage of the collection of information, or any part thereof;

"( d) is written using plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology and is understandable to those who are to respond;

"( e) is to be implemented in ways consistent and compatible, to the maximum extent practicable, with the existing reporting and recordkeeping practices of those who are to respond;

"( f) indicates for each recordkeeping requirement the length of time persons are required to maintain the records specified;

"( g) informs potential respondents of the information called for under § 1320.8( b)( 3); [ see below]

"( h) has been developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected, including the processing of the information in a manner which shall enhance, where appropriate, the utility of the information to agencies and the public;

"( I) uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology appropriate to the purpose for which the information is to be collected; and "( j) to the maximum extent practicable, uses appropriate information technology to reduce burden and improve data quality, agency efficiency and responsiveness to the public."

NOTE: 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3) requires that each collection of information:

"( 3) informs and provides reasonable notice to the potential persons to whom the collection of information is addressed of: "( I) the reasons the information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( ii) the way such information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( iii) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the average burden of the collection ( together with a request that the public direct to the agency any comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden); "( iv) whether responses to the collection of information are voluntary, required to obtain or retain a benefit ( citing authority), or mandatory ( citing authority); "( v) the nature and extent of confidentiality to be provided, if any ( citing authority); and "( vi) the fact that any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number."

OMB 83 I ( Instructions) 10/ 95


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55263-55264]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21892]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2007-D-0369]

Draft Guidance for Industry on Bioequivalence Recommendations for
Fluticasone Propionate; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Bioequivalence
Recommendations for Fluticasone Propionate; Salmeterol Xinafoate.'' The
recommendations provide specific guidance on the design of
bioequivalence (BE) studies to support abbreviated new drug
applications (ANDAs) for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate.

DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comments on
this draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by November 12, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing
your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.
    Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bhawana Saluja, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (HFD-600), Food and Drug Administration, 7519
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In the Federal Register of June 11, 2010 (75 FR 33311), FDA
announced the availability of a guidance for industry entitled
``Bioequivalence Recommendations for Specific Products,'' which
explained the process that would be used to make product-specific BE
recommendations available to the public on FDA's Web site at http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm. As described in that guidance, FDA adopted this process as
a means to develop and disseminate product-specific BE recommendations
and provide a meaningful opportunity for the public to consider and
comment on those recommendations. This notice announces the
availability of draft BE recommendations for fluticasone propionate;
salmeterol xinafoate.
    Advair Diskus (fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate), new
drug application 021077, was initially approved by FDA in August 2000.
There are no approved ANDAs for this product. FDA is now issuing a
draft guidance for industry on BE recommendations for generic
fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate (Draft Fluticasone
Propionate; Salmeterol Xinafoate BE Recommendations).
    In December 2009, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), manufacturer of the
reference listed drug Advair Diskus, submitted a citizen petition
requesting that FDA withhold approval of any ANDA or 505(b)(2)
application for generic oral inhalation products containing fluticasone
propionate and/or salmeterol xinafoate unless certain conditions were
satisfied, including conditions related to demonstrating BE (Docket No.
FDA-2009-P-0597). FDA is reviewing the issues raised in the petition.
FDA will consider any comments on the Draft Fluticasone Propionate;
Salmeterol Xinafoate BE Recommendations before responding to GSK's
citizen petition.
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the Agency's current thinking on the design
of BE studies to support ANDAs for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol
xinafoate. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person
and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach
may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.

II. Comments

    Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to http://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: September 3, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-21892 Filed 9-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register: January 10, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 7)]
[Notices]
[Page 1874]
[DOCID:fr10ja08-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP07-62-000, CP07-63-000, CP07-64-000, CP07-65-000]

AES Sparrows Point LNG, L.C.C., Mid-Atlantic Express, L.L.C.;
Notice of Technical Conference

January 3, 2008.
    On Tuesday, January 15, 2008, staff of the Office of Energy
Projects will convene a technical conference regarding the proposed
Sparrows Point Import Terminal and Pipeline Project. The technical
conference will be held at the Commission Headquarters in Washington,
DC, room 3M-3.
    The conference will be held in two sessions, morning and afternoon.
The morning session will commence at 10 a.m. (EDT) and discuss issues
related to Mid-Atlantic Express's proposal to construct some of its
proposed pipeline in Baltimore Gas & Electric's right of way. The
afternoon session will commence at 1 p.m. (EDT) and discuss liquefied
natural gas (LNG) technical issues.
    The morning session is open to the public. Due to the nature of
critical energy infrastructure information (CEII) and security issues
to be explored discussing LNG issues, the afternoon session is not open
to the public. Attendance to the afternoon session will be limited to
existing parties to the above-referenced proceeding (anyone who has
specifically requested to intervene as a party) and to representatives
of interested federal, state, and local agencies. Any person planning
to attend the January 15th technical conference must register by close
of business on Monday, January 14, 2008. Registration may be submitted
either online at https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/registration/tech-conf-01-15-form.asp
 or by faxing a copy of the form (found at the referenced

online link) to<PHONE_NUMBER>. Attendees to the afternoon session must
sign a non-disclosure statement prior to entering that session. For
additional information regarding the technical conference, please
contact Joanne Wachholder at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-229 Filed 1-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 1747]
[FR Doc No: 2016-32052]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2016-0026; OMB No. 1660-0115]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Environmental and Historic Preservation
Screening Form

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will submit the
information collection abstracted below to the Office of Management and
Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The submission will describe the
nature of the information collection, the categories of respondents,
the estimated burden (i.e., the time, effort and resources used by
respondents to respond) and cost, and the actual data collection
instruments FEMA will use.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 6, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the proposed information
collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the Desk
Officer for the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection should be made to Director,
Records Management Division, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472-
3100, or email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This information collection previously
published in the Federal Register on October 26, 2016 at 81 FR 74462
with a 60 day public comment period. No comments were received. The
purpose of this notice is to notify the public that FEMA will submit
the information collection abstracted below to the Office of Management
and Budget for review and clearance.

Collection of Information

    Title: Environmental and Historic Preservation Screening Form.
    Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-0115.
    Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA Form 024-0-1, Environmental and
Historic Preservation Screening Form.
    Abstract: NEPA requires that each Federal agency to examine the
impact of its actions (including the actions of recipients using grant
funds) on the human environment, to look at potential alternatives to
that action, and to inform both decision-makers and the public of those
impacts through a transparent process. This Screening Form will
facilitate FEMA's review of recipient actions in FEMA's effort to
comply with the environmental requirements.
    Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal Government; Not-for-Profit
Institutions.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,000.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 16,000 hours.
    Estimated Cost: The estimated annual cost to respondents for the
hour burden is $796,320. There are no annual costs to respondents'
operations and maintenance costs for technical services. There are no
annual start-up or capital costs. The cost to the Federal Government is
$5,504,580.

    Dated: December 27, 2016.
Richard W. Mattison,
Records Management Program Chief, Mission Support, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2016-32052 Filed 1-5-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-46-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81529-81530]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25862]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2023-2183; Summary Notice No. 2023-46]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; Gulfstream

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations. The
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and
participation in, the FAA's exemption process. Neither publication of
this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary
is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final
disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before December 12, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2023-2183
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.

     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deana Stedman, AIR-646, Federal
Aviation Administration, phone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email [email protected]. This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 17, 2023.
Daniel J. Commins,
Manager, Integration and Performance.

PETITION FOR EXEMPTION

    Docket No.: FAA-2023-2183.
    Petitioner: Gulfstream.
    Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: Sec. Sec.  25.951(c), 25.952(a), and
25.901(d).
    Description of Relief Sought: The petitioner has requested a
partial exemption from the affected sections of 14 CFR for a period of
3 years, in order to develop and conduct a full-scale test of the fuel
system to show that the fuel system icing threat has been adequately
mitigated for the Model GVIII-G700 and Model GVIII-G800 airplanes.

[FR Doc. 2023-25862 Filed 11-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P