[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50935-50936]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23845]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2017-0104]

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    Under Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this
provides the public notice that on October 2, 2017, Caltrain petitioned
the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for a waiver of compliance
from certain provisions of the Federal railroad safety regulations
contained at 49 CFR part 238. FRA assigned the petition Docket Number
FRA-2017-0104.
    Caltrain operates commuter rail passenger service throughout
California's Peninsula corridor from San Francisco to Gilroy under the
auspices of the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB). In this
petition, Caltrain seeks a waiver of compliance from a portion of 49
CFR 238.113(a)(2), Emergency window exits, for the Caltrain Electric
Multiple Unit (EMU) restroom car. The Americans With Disabilities Act
(ADA)-compliant restroom facility extends from the exterior side door
to nearly the centerline of the car, thus precluding the placement of
the emergency window exit in this quadrant of the car in the lower main
level. Caltrain believes the intent of the emergency window requirement
is met, since the position of the window provides the closest practical
fulfillment of the location requirements, without otherwise
compromising access to either the emergency window exit or the ADA
restroom facility. Additionally, passengers have ready access to the
exterior side door with a clear opening of 51 inches. However, since
the design does not meet the literal interpretation of ``each end
(half) of the car,'' Caltrain is requesting a waiver of this
requirement for this restroom car.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations
Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested parties
desire an opportunity for oral comment and a public hearing, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
    Communications received by December 18, 2017 will be considered by
FRA before final action is taken. Comments received after that date
will be considered if practicable.
    Anyone can search the electronic form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better
inform its processes. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the commenter

provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See also https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice for the privacy notice of regulations.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 26, 2017.
John K. Alexy,
Director, Office of Safety Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2017-23845 Filed 11-1-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register: July 14, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 135)]
[Notices]
[Page 40091-40092]
[DOCID:fr14jy06-65]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Application Ready for Environmental Analysis and
Soliciting Comments, Recommendations, Terms and Conditions, and
Prescriptions

July 6, 2006.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: New Major License.
    b. Project No: 11910-002.
    c. Date Filed: August 31, 2004.
    d. Applicant: Symbiotics, LLC.

    e. Name of Project: Applegate Dam Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Applegate River, near the town of Medford,
Jackson County, Oregon. The proposed project would be located at the
existing Applegate dam and reservoir, which are owned and operated by
the Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers. The proposed project
boundary would include approximately 8.3 acres of U.S. lands.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791 (a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Brent L. Smith, Northwest Power Services,
Inc. P.O. Box 535, Rigby, Idaho 83442,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Tim Looney,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, recommendations, terms and
conditions, and prescriptions is 60 days from the issuance of this
notice; reply comments are due 105 days from the issuance date of this
notice.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    Comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, and prescriptions
may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. The
Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
(http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.

    k. This application has been accepted and is now ready for
environmental analysis.
    l. The Applicant proposes to utilize the existing Applegate Dam,
Applegate Reservoir, outlet works, and spillway, owned and operated by
the Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers. The Applicant proposes
to construct a powerhouse with an installed capacity of 10 megawatts at
the area downstream from the dam. The Applicant also proposes to
construct a new 15-mile-long, 69-kilovolt overhead power transmission
line to connect the powerhouse with a substation located at Ruch,
Oregon. The average annual generation is estimated to be 44,300,000
kilowatt-hours.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''

link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-
866-208-3676, or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is also available for
inspection and reproduction at the address in item h above.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp
 to be notified via e-mail of new filings and

issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.
    All filings must (1) bear in all capital letters the title
``COMMENTS'', ``REPLY COMMENTS'', ``RECOMMENDATIONS,'' ``TERMS AND
CONDITIONS,'' or ``PRESCRIPTIONS;'' (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person submitting the filing; and (4) otherwise comply
with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, recommendations, terms and conditions or prescriptions must
set forth their evidentiary basis and otherwise comply with the
requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may obtain copies of the
application directly from the applicant. Each filing must be
accompanied by proof of service on all persons listed on the service
list prepared by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with
18 CFR 4.34(b), and 385.2010.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp
 to be notified via e-mail of new filings and

issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.
    n. Public notice of the filing of the initial development
application, which has already been given, established the due date for
filing competing applications or notices of intent. Under the
Commission's regulations, any competing development application must be
filed in response to and in compliance with public notice of the
initial development application. No competing applications or notices
of intent may be filed in response to this notice.
    o. Procedural schedule and final amendments: Revisions to the
schedule will be made as appropriate. The schedule given in the April
10, 2006 Notice of Application Accepted for Filing is revised as
follows:
    Notice that application is ready for environmental analysis (EA):
July 2006.
    Notice of the availability of the EA: January 2007.
    Ready for Commission's decision on the application: April 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-11169 Filed 7-13-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44415-44417]
[FR Doc No: 2023-14666]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-97843; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2023-039]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Its Fee Schedule

July 6, 2023.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 22, 2023, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``BZX'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``BZX'') proposes to
amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule applicable to its
equities trading platform (``BZX Equities'') by amending the definition
of the Russell Reconstitution Day. The Exchange proposes to implement
these changes effective June 22, 2023.
    The ``definitions'' section of the Exchange's Fee Schedule defines
various terms used throughout the Fee Schedule. As explained under the
definitions of ADAV, ADV, and TCV,\3\ the Exchange currently excludes
the Russell Reconstitution Day from the calculation of ADAV, ADV, and
TCV, each of which are calculated on a monthly basis.\4\ The Russell
Reconstitution Day is defined in the Fee Schedule as ``the last Friday
in June.'' \5\ While generally the Russell Reconstitution Day does
occur on the last Friday in June, in months where there are five
Fridays in June the Russell Reconstitution Day instead falls on the
fourth Friday in June. The Exchange proposes to amend the definition of
Russell Reconstitution Day to ``the fourth Friday in June'' \6\ in
order to provide a more accurate description of the date which will not
be included in the calculation of ADAV, ADV, and TCV to its Members.\7\
The Exchange is not proposing to make any other changes to the
Definitions in its Fee Schedule and will announce the change via a
Trade Desk notice to Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ ``ADAV'' means average daily added volume calculated as the
number of shares added per day and ``ADV'' means average daily
volume calculated as the number of shares added or removed,
combined, per day. ADAV and ADV are calculated on a monthly basis.
``TCV'' means total consolidated volume as the volume reported by
all exchanges and trade reporting facilities to a consolidated
transaction reporting plan for the month for which the fees apply.
    \4\ The Russell Reconstitution Day is generally characterized by
high trading volumes, much of which are derived from market
participants who are not generally as active entering the market to
rebalance their holdings in-line with the annual rebalancing of the
Russell indices. The Exchange, along with other competing exchanges,
excludes the Russell Reconstitution Day from certain volume
calculations as the high trading volumes can significantly impact
trading and quoting calculations.
    \5\ See BZX Equities Fee Schedule, Definitions.
    \6\ See Russell U.S. Equity Indices Construction and
Methodology, available at https://research.ftserussell.com/products/downloads/Russell-US-indexes.pdf (last accessed June 21, 2023).
    \7\ See Rule 1.5(n) (``Member''). The term ``Member'' shall mean
any registered broker or dealer that has been admitted to membership
in the Exchange. A Member will have the status of a ``member'' of
the Exchange as that term is defined in Section 3(a)(3) of the Act.
Membership may be granted to a sole proprietor, partnership,
corporation, limited liability company or other organization which
is a registered broker or dealer pursuant to Section 15 of the Act,
and which has been approved by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\8\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers as well as Section 6(b)(4) \11\
as it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among its Members and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \10\ Id.
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes its proposal to amend the
definition of the ``Russell Reconstitution Day'' is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between customer, issuers, brokers, or
dealers and is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of
fees. Specifically, the proposal is intended only to add clarity to the
Exchange's Fee Schedule by providing Members with additional certainty
as to their level of rebates and costs for trading during the month of
June and involves no substantive change. Additionally, the proposed
change promotes just and equitable principles of trade and is designed
to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system as it provides transparency to
Members regarding which date in the month of June will not be included
in the calculation of ADAV, ADV, and TCV.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as discussed above,
the Exchange believes that the proposed changes would encourage the
submission of additional order flow to a public exchange, thereby
promoting market depth, execution incentives and enhanced execution
opportunities, as well as price discovery and transparency for all
Members. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes
further the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering
competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of
individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.''
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule changes do not impose any
burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange
does not believe that its proposal to revise the definition of
``Russell Reconstitution Day'' will have any impact on competition as
the change is only intended to add clarity to the Exchange's Fee
Schedule and involves no substantive change.
    Next, the Exchange believes the proposed rule changes does not
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market.
Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on
and direct their order flow, including other equities exchanges, off-
exchange venues, and alternative trading systems. Additionally, the
Exchange represents a small percentage of the overall market. By
providing Members with a greater level of certainty as to which date in
the month of June will be excluded from the calculation of ADAV, ADV,
and TCV, the Exchange is providing additional certainty as to the level
of rebates and costs for trading during the month of the Russell
reconstitution, which could promote competition between the Exchange
and other execution venues. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe
its proposed fee change imposes any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \12\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \13\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number
    SR-CboeBZX-2023-039 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-039. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-039 and should
be submitted on or before August 2, 2023.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-14666 Filed 7-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 25, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27981-27984]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10983]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 81

[EPA-R04-OAR-2020-0482; FRL-10024-20-Region 4]

Air Quality Designation; TN: Redesignation of the Sumner County
2010 Sulfur Dioxide Unclassifiable Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a
submission by the State of Tennessee, through the Tennessee Department
of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), on September 29, 2020, to
redesignate the Sumner County, Tennessee, unclassifiable area
(hereinafter referred to as the ``Sumner County Area'' or ``Area'') to
attainment/unclassifiable for the 2010 1-hour primary sulfur dioxide
(SO2) national ambient air quality standard (hereinafter
referred to as the 2010 SO2 1-hour NAAQS). EPA now has
sufficient information to determine that the Sumner County Area is
attaining the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS and is approving the
State's request and redesignating the Area to attainment/unclassifiable
for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS.

DATES: This rule is effective June 24, 2021.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2020-0482. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the
index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evan Adams, Air Regulatory Management
Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Adams can be reached by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via electronic mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) establishes a process for air
quality management through the establishment and implementation of the
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). On June 2, 2010, EPA
revised the primary SO2 NAAQS, establishing a new 1-hour
SO2 standard of 75 parts per billion (ppb). See 75 FR 35520
(June 22, 2010).\1\ After the promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS,
EPA is required to designate all areas of the country, pursuant to
section 107(d)(1)-(2) of the CAA. For the 2010 1-hour SO2
NAAQS, designations were based on EPA's application of the nationwide
analytical approach to, and technical assessment of, the weight of
evidence for each area, including but not limited to available air
quality monitoring data and air quality modeling results. In advance of
designating the Sumner County Area, EPA issued updated designations
guidance through a March 20, 2015, memorandum from Stephen D. Page,
Director, U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, to
Air Division Directors, U.S. EPA Regions 1-10, titled ``Updated
Guidance for Area Designations for the 2010 Primary Sulfur Dioxide
National Ambient Air Quality Standard,'' which contains the factors
that EPA evaluated in determining the appropriate designations and
associated boundaries when designating the Sumner County Area,
including: (1) Air quality characterization via ambient monitoring or
dispersion modeling results; (2) emissions-related data; (3)
meteorology; (4) geography and topography; and (5) jurisdictional
boundaries.2 3 The guidance also references EPA's non-
binding Monitoring Technical Assistance Document (Monitoring TAD) and
Modeling Technical Assistance Document (Modeling TAD),\4\ which contain
scientifically sound recommendations on how air agencies should conduct
such monitoring or modeling.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On February 25, 2019 (effective April 17, 2019), based on a
review of the full body of currently available scientific evidence
and exposure/risk information, EPA issued a decision to retain the
existing NAAQS for SO2. See 84 FR 9866.
    \2\ The 2015 memorandum is available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-04/documents/20150320so2designations.pdf.
    \3\ This designation guidance has since been superseded by a
July 22, 2016, designation guidance memorandum from Stephen D. Page,
Director, U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, to
Regional Air Division Directors, U.S. EPA Regions 1-10. The 2016
memorandum is available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-07/documents/areadesign.pdf.
    \4\ ``Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air
Quality Standards Designations Modeling Technical Assistance
Document,'' August 2016 draft, available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-06/documents/so2modelingtad.pdf. Note,
EPA released earlier drafts of this document in May 2013 and
February 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA completed the first set of initial area designations for the
2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS in 2013 (Round 1). Pursuant to a March
2, 2015, consent decree and court-ordered schedule,\5\ EPA finalized a
second set of initial area designations for the 2010 1-hour
SO2 NAAQS in 2016 (Round 2). The March 2, 2015, consent
decree identified the following emissions criteria such that EPA must
designate, in Round 2, an area surrounding any stationary source which
had: (a) Annual emissions in 2012 exceeding 16,000 tons of
SO2, or (b) both an annual average emissions rate of at
least 0.45 pounds of SO2 per one million British thermal
units, according to EPA's Clean Air Markets Division Database, and
annual emissions of at least 2,600 tons of SO2 in 2012.
Sumner County, Tennessee, contained one source, Tennessee Valley
Authority (TVA) Gallatin Fossil Plant (TVA Gallatin), that met these
Round 2 criteria. EPA evaluated the Area, using the five factors
identified previously, during the Round 2 designations. TVA Gallatin is
a large Electric Generating Unit located in north central Tennessee in
the southern portion of Sumner County, approximately five kilometers
(km) southeast of the center of Gallatin, Tennessee. The facility was
included in the list of facilities to be designated pursuant to the
March 2, 2015, Consent Decree.6 7
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Sierra Club et. al. v. McCarthy, Civil Action No. 3:13-
cv-3953-SI (N.D. Cal.), and 79 FR 31325 (June 2, 2014).
    \6\ TVA Gallatin was also subject to EPA's 2015 Data
Requirements Rule (DRR) for the 2010 SO2 1-hour NAAQS.
See https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-06/documents/tn.pdf for Tennessee's letter dated January 15, 2016, with the Data
Requirements Rule (DRR) source list.
    \7\ In accordance with the DRR, 40 CFR part 51, subpart BB,
through a letter dated June 7, 2016, Tennessee notified EPA that the
State chose to characterize peak 1-hour SO2
concentrations for TVA Gallatin using air quality dispersion
modeling.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA's March 20, 2015, guidance specified the designation category
definitions to be used in the Round 2 designations.\8\ EPA was unable
to determine whether the Sumner County Area met the definition of a
nonattainment area or the definition of an attainment area based on the
available information at the time of the Round 2 designations. As a
result, EPA designated the Sumner County Area as unclassifiable in the
Round 2 designations published on July 12, 2016.\9\ The boundary for
this designation was the jurisdictional boundary of Sumner County.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Specifically, EPA defined a ``nonattainment'' area as an
area that EPA has determined violates the 2010 1-hour SO2
NAAQS based on the most recent three years of ambient air quality
monitoring data or an appropriate modeling analysis, or that EPA has
determined contributes to a violation in a nearby area; and defined
an ``attainment'' area as an area that EPA has determined meets the
2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS and does not contribute to a
violation of the NAAQS in a nearby area based on either: (a) The
most recent 3 years of ambient air quality monitoring data from a
monitoring network in an area that is sufficient to be compared to
the NAAQS per EPA interpretations in the Monitoring TAD, or (b) an
appropriate modeling analysis.
    \9\ See 81 FR 45039 (July 12, 2016), codified at 40 CFR 81.343.
    \10\ Detailed rationale, analyses, and other information
supporting EPA's original Round 2 designation for this Area can be
found in the intended and final Round 2 designation's TSD for
Tennessee. This document, along with all other supporting materials
for the original 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS designation for
Sumner County, can be found on EPA's SO2 designations
website. EPA SO2 designations website can be found at
https://www.epa.gov/sulfur-dioxide-designations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In support of this final redesignation action, EPA evaluated new
modeling for the Sumner County Area provided by Tennessee and developed
a new technical support document (TSD).\11\ On September 29, 2020,
Tennessee submitted a request for EPA to redesignate the Sumner County
Area to attainment/unclassifiable for the 2010 1-hour primary
SO2 NAAQS based on air quality dispersion modeling showing
that the Area is in compliance with the 2010 1-hour primary
SO2 NAAQS.12 13 14

The updated modeling was performed using the current version of EPA's
recommended dispersion model, AERMOD version 19191, with the most
recent three years of actual SO2 emissions (2017-2019) from
the TVA Gallatin facility and concurrent meteorology data.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The TSD for this proposed action is included in the docket.
    \12\ The demonstration of attainment through air quality
dispersion modeling requires an area to review and report annual
SO2 emissions pursuant to DRR ongoing verification at 40
CFR 51.1205(b). In its September 29, 2020, redesignation request
letter, Tennessee also requested to terminate the section 51.1205(b)
annual reporting requirement because the modeling analyses
demonstrated a value of at least 50 percent below the 2010 1-hour
SO2 NAAQS at all receptors. EPA will address the annual
reporting termination request in a separate action which has no
bearing on the final approval of the redesignation.
    \13\ See letter signed by Michelle Owenby, Director of TDEC's
Division of Air Pollution Control, September 29, 2020, requesting
that EPA redesignate Sumner County, Tennessee, to attainment/
unclassifiable for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS.
    \14\ EPA is redesignating the area to ``attainment/
unclassifiable'' because, as noted in the proposal, EPA reserves the
``attainment'' category for when EPA redesignates a nonattainment
area that has attained the relevant NAAQS and has an approved
maintenance plan.
    \15\ The TSD included in the docket for this proposed
redesignation action provides a detailed summary of Tennessee's
modeling analysis and EPA's evaluation of the modeling. The modeling
files are not included in the electronic docket for this action due
to their nature, size, and incompatibility with the Federal Docket
Management System. These files are available at the EPA Region 4
office for review. To request these files, please contact the person
listed in the notice under the section titled FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After reviewing Tennessee's request under CAA section 107(d)(3)(D)
and all available information, EPA has determined that the modeling
provided by the State comports with EPA's current Modeling TAD and
EPA's Guideline on Air Quality Models (40 CFR part 51 Appendix W) and
is acceptable for assessing the attainment status of the Sumner County
Area. The State's modeling indicates that the predicted maximum design
value at any receptor in the modeling domain is 60.5 micrograms per
cubic meter ([mu]g/m\3\), or 23.1 ppb. EPA's review confirms that the
modeling results appropriately characterize the air quality in the
Sumner County Area and that predicted ambient SO2
concentrations are below the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS of 196.4
[mu]g/m\3\, or 75 ppb. Additionally, there is no evidence of monitored
or modeled violations in the surrounding counties such that the source
is contributing to any nearby area that does not meet the NAAQS.
    EPA is taking final action to approve Tennessee's redesignation
request and is redesignating the entirety of Sumner County that was
designated as unclassifiable in July 2016 to attainment/unclassifiable
based on the currently available information that demonstrates
attainment of the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS.\16\ In a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published on March 5, 2021 (86 FR 12892),
EPA proposed to approve the State's redesignation request. The details
of Tennessee's submittal and the rationale for EPA's actions are
further explained in the NPRM. Comments on the NPRM were due on or
before April 5, 2021. EPA did not receive any adverse comments on the
action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ For redesignations of unclassifiable areas, the necessary
analysis is equivalent to what would be required in a designation in
the first instance since EPA has not found the area to be attainment
or nonattainment. In this first instance, the goal is to
characterize existing ambient air quality. As such, it is
appropriate to use actual emissions for estimating existing air
quality. EPA's acceptance of modeling using actual emissions in this
instance should not be construed to define what would be needed for
a demonstration of attainment and maintenance for purposes of a
redesignation of a nonattainment area to attainment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Final Action

    EPA is approving Tennessee's September 29, 2020, request to
redesignate the Sumner County Area from unclassifiable to attainment/
unclassifiable for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. EPA has
reviewed the modeling provided by the State with its redesignation
request and finds that it complies with EPA's current Modeling TAD and
EPA's Guideline on Air Quality Models (40 CFR part 51 Appendix W) and
is acceptable for assessing the attainment status of the Sumner County
Area. This approval of the redesignation request changes the legal
designation, found at 40 CFR part 81, of Sumner County from
unclassifiable to attainment/unclassifiable for the 2010 1-hour
SO2 NAAQS.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, redesignation of an area to attainment/
unclassifiable is an action that affects the status of a geographical
area and does not impose any additional regulatory requirements on
sources beyond those imposed by state law. A redesignation to
attainment/unclassifiable does not in and of itself create any new
requirements, but rather results in the applicability of requirements
contained in the CAA for areas that have been redesignated to
attainment. Accordingly, this action merely redesignates an area to
attainment/unclassifiable and does not impose additional requirements.
For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Will not have disproportionate human health or
environmental effects under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February
16, 1994).
    This final redesignation does not apply to any Indian reservation
land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated
that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the
rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 26, 2021. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial

review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.

    Dated: May 17, 2021.
John Blevins,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 81
as follows:

PART 81--DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES

0
1. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  81.343, the table titled ``Tennessee-2010 Sulfur Dioxide
NAAQS (Primary)'' is amended by revising the entry for ``Sumner County,
TN'' to read as follows:

Sec.  81.343  Tennessee.

* * * * *

                  Tennessee--2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS
                                [Primary]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Designation
       Designated area       -------------------------------------------
                                     Date 1                 Type
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              * * * * * * *
    Sumner County, TN \2\...  June 24, 2021.......  Attainment/
                                                     Unclassifiable.
Sumner County

                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This date is April 9, 2018, unless otherwise noted.
\2\ Excludes Indian country located in each area, if any, unless
  otherwise specified.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2021-10983 Filed 5-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69926-69927]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28252]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket No. PHMSA-2009-0126; Notice No. 12-12]

Advisory Notice: Notice of Intent To Provide Compliance Date
Extension for Air-Passenger Notification of Hazardous Material
Restrictions

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Advisory notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: PHMSA and the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Office
of Security and Hazardous Materials Safety hereby provide notification
of our intent to extend the compliance date for certain provisions
adopted in a January 19, 2011 final rule (PHMSA-2009-0126; 76 FR 3308)
by no less than one year beyond the current January 1, 2013 compliance
date in a future rulemaking action. This notice is intended to provide
the widest dissemination of our planned future action to all
potentially affected parties and to allow for development of a
collaborative approach to implementing air-passenger notifications
between interested government, commercial, and private entities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Stevens, Department of
Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration,
Standards and Rulemaking Division (PHH-10),<PHONE_NUMBER>, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Section 175.25 of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR
Parts 171-180) prescribes the requirements for air-passenger
notification of hazardous materials restrictions. One primary purpose
for this regulation is to enhance public safety awareness regarding the
carriage of hazardous materials onboard aircraft, either as carry-on
items or in checked baggage. Improved public safety awareness
facilitates passenger compliance with applicable regulatory
requirements, thus enhancing overall aviation safety by reducing the
likelihood of inappropriate items being transported onboard aircraft.
On January 19, 2011, PHMSA amended 49 CFR 175.25 (PHMSA-2009-0126; 76
FR 3308). The amendments included requirements for passenger
notification during ticket purchase and flight check-in, and are
effective January 1, 2013. While PHMSA has the primary responsibility
for issuing 49 CFR regulations, the FAA has primary responsibility for
overseeing compliance with these regulations as they pertain to air
transport. Since publication of the January 19, 2011 final rule, PHMSA
and the FAA have received numerous inquiries regarding specific
interpretations of the amended requirements and the acceptability of
certain means of compliance with the revised regulations. This notice
responds to administrative appeals that request up to a two-year
extension of the compliance date of the adopted passenger notification
provisions under Sec.  175.25 of the HMR.

II. Public Meeting

    Subsequent to issuance of the January 19, 2011 final rule, PHMSA
and the FAA received numerous written and oral comments requesting
additional time for affected entities to implement the new provisions
in a more effective and cooperative manner. As a result, a public
meeting was held on August 16, 2012, in Washington, DC, to discuss
issues and concerns of participants and regulators alike. Consequently,
PHMSA and the FAA jointly announced that we seek further collaboration
with the air-passenger transportation community in defining what
constitutes compliance with the new provisions, to reduce or eliminate
any ambiguities, and to bring more transparency to the process.

III. Conclusion

    PHMSA and FAA agree that delaying the full compliance date of
revised Sec.  175.25 is warranted, particularly if a

delay supports the implementation of more effective methods for
increasing passenger awareness of, and compliance with, the HMR.
Additionally, we acknowledge that better notification of industry
stakeholders is necessary if we wish to gain widespread support of the
collaborative approach to implementing effective and value-added
solutions as discussed during the August 16, 2012 public meeting.
    Therefore, PHMSA and FAA are providing this notification of our
intent to extend in a future rulemaking action, the compliance date by
no less than one year, beyond the current January 1, 2013 compliance
date. We look forward to collaborating with all interested parties as
we move forward to address this issue and enhance aviation safety.

    Issued in Washington, DC on November 15, 2012 under authority
delegated in 49 CFR Part 106.
Magdy El-Sibaie,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-28252 Filed 11-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register: August 7, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 151)]
[Notices]
[Page 44689-44690]
[DOCID:fr07au06-65]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Motions
To Intervene, Protests, and Comments

July 28, 2006.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Preliminary Permit.
    b. Project No.: 12715-000.
    c. Date filed: July 18, 2006.
    d. Applicant: Fairlawn Hydroelectric Company LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Jennings Randolph Dam Project.
    f. Location: The project would be located on the Potomac River, in
Mineral County, West Virginia, and Garrett County, Maryland. The
project would use the Jennings Randolph Dam owned by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. M. Clifford Phillips, Fairlawn
Hydroelectric Company LLC, 150 North Miller Road, Suite 450C, Fairlawn,
OH 44333, Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Robert Bell,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    j. Deadline for filing comments, protests, and motions to
intervene: 60 days from the issuance date of this notice.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person in the official service list for the
project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Project: The proposed project would use the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineer's Jennings

Randolph Dam and consist of: (1) A proposed powerhouse containing two
generating units with a total installed capacity of 10.5 megawatts, (2)
a proposed 4-mile-long, 14.7-kilovolt transmission line; and (3)
appurtenant facilities. The project would have an annual generation of
48 gigawatt hours, which would be sold to a local utility.
    l. Locations of Applications: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission in the
Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A,
Washington DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also
be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the

``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is

also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item h
above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Competing Preliminary Permit: Anyone desiring to file a
competing application for preliminary permit for a proposed project
must submit the competing application itself, or a notice of intent to
file such an application, to the Commission on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application (see 18 CFR 4.36).
Submission of a timely notice of intent allows an interested person to
file the competing preliminary permit application no later than 30 days
after the specified comment date for the particular application. A
competing preliminary permit application must conform with 18 CFR
4.30(b) and 4.36.
    o. Competing Development Application: Any qualified development
applicant desiring to file a competing development application must
submit to the Commission, on or before a specified comment date for the
particular application, either a competing development application or a
notice of intent to file such an application. Submission of a timely
notice of intent to file a development application allows an interested
person to file the competing application no later than 120 days after
the specified comment date for the particular application. A competing
license application must conform with 18 CFR 4.30(b) and 4.36.
    p. Notice of Intent: A notice of intent must specify the exact
name, business address, and telephone number of the prospective
applicant, and must include an unequivocal statement of intent to
submit, if such an application may be filed, either a preliminary
permit application or a development application (specify which type of
application). A notice of intent must be served on the applicant(s)
named in this public notice.
    q. Proposed Scope of Studies under Permit: A preliminary permit, if
issued, does not authorize construction. The term of the proposed
preliminary permit would be 36 months. The work proposed under the
preliminary permit would include economic analysis, preparation of
preliminary engineering plans, and a study of environmental impacts.
Based on the results of these studies, the Applicant would decide
whether to proceed with the preparation of a development application to
construct and operate the project.
    r. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site under ``e-filing'' link.
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing.
    s. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filings must
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``COMPETING
APPLICATION'', ``RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS'',
``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable, and the Project
Number of the particular application to which the filing refers. Any of
the above-named documents must be filed by providing the original and
the number of copies provided by the Commission's regulations to: The
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. A copy of any motion to intervene must also be
served upon each representative of the Applicant specified in the
particular application.
    t. Agency Comments: Federal, State, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-12715 Filed 8-4-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 26, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24678-24680]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09595]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-77659; File No. SR-CBOE-2016-037]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees Schedule

April 20, 2016.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 11, 2016, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial''
proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this
notice to

solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the Frequent Trader Program. The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule.\5\ By way of
background, on April 1, 2016, the Exchange adopted a program that
offers transaction fee rebates to Customers (origin code ``C'') that
meet certain volume thresholds in CBOE VIX Volatility Index options
(``VIX options'') and S&P 500 Index options (``SPX''), weekly S&P 500
options (``SPXW'') and p.m.-settled SPX Index options (``SPXpm'')
(collectively referred to as ``SPX options'') provided the Customer
registers for the program (the ``Frequent Trader Program'' or
``Program'').\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed change on April 4,
2016 (SR-CBOE-2016-035). On April 11, 2016, the Exchange withdrew
that filing and replaced it with SR-CBOE-2016-037.
    \6\ See SR-CBOE-2016-023
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To participate in the Frequent Trader Program, Customers register
with the Exchange. Once registered, the Customer is provided a unique
identification number (``FTID'') that can be affixed to each of its
orders. The FTID allows the Exchange to identify and aggregate all
electronic and manual trades during both the Regular Trading Hours and
Extended Trading Hours sessions from that Customer for purposes of
determining whether the Customer meets any of the various volume
thresholds. The Customer has to provide its FTID to the Trading Permit
Holder (``TPH'') submitting that Customer's order to the Exchange
(executing agent'' or ``executing TPH'') and that executing TPH would
have to enter the Customer's FTID on each of that Customer's orders.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Exchange notes that it is the responsibility of the
Customer to request that the executing TPH affix its FTID to its
order(s), and that it is voluntarily for the executing TPH to do so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that there are instances however, in which a
Customer's FTID was not or could not be, affixed to an order. For
example, an executing TPH may receive an order with multiple contra
parties, including parties that are also customers with their own
unique FTIDs. The executing TPH's front end system however, may only
allow it to input only one FTID on the order. Thus the other Customers
to the trade would not have their FTID represented at the time of
submission. Additionally, an executing TPH's front end system may not
yet allow for the input of an FTID on an order upon submission
altogether. The Exchange also notes that it is possible that an
executing TPH inadvertently enters an incorrect FTID number on an
order. Accordingly, the Exchange is proposing to provide executing TPHs
the ability to submit to the exchange a form (the ``Frequent Trader
Program--Volume Corrections Form'' or ``Form'') that would provide a
mechanism for executing TPHs to identify transactions to the Exchange
that should have been, but were not, associated with particular FTIDs.
More specifically, the executing TPH would identify on the form the
``correct'' FTID that should be associated with a specific transaction,
so that such volume is properly counted towards the appropriate
Customer's aggregated volume for purposes of determining what tier, if
any, the customer meets. The Exchange notes that transactions
identified on the Form will only be counted towards the identified
Customer's volume if that Customer was already registered for the
Frequent Trader Program prior to the time the transaction occurred
(e.g., if a customer trades 1,000 contracts the morning of April 1 and
registers for the Frequent Trader Program the afternoon of April 1,
that customer cannot have its executing TPH submit a form on its behalf
for those 1,000 contracts executed prior to registration in the
Program). The Exchange lastly proposes to provide that the Frequent
Trader Program--Volume Corrections Form be submitted to the Exchange
within 3 business days in order to ensure timely processing.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\8\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes providing executing TPHs the
ability to submit to the exchange a form that identifies transactions
that should have been, but were not, associated with particular FTIDs,
removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and protects investors and the
public interest because there are a number of instances in which a
Customer's FTID may not be affixed to a particular transaction at the
time of execution even though the traded contracts, or a portion
thereof, is actually associated with that Customer. The Exchange notes
that providing a mechanism to ``correct'' FTIDs post-trade, helps
ensure that a Customer's total volume at the end of the month
accurately reflects their real trading volume, including volume from
transactions that, upon submission of the order, did not reflect their
FTID. The Exchange believes it's reasonable to provide that the Form be
submitted within 3 business days in order to ensure timely processing
and finality. The Exchange also believes it's reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly

discriminatory to provide that transactions identified on the Form will
only be counted towards the identified Customer's volume if that
Customer was already registered for the Frequent Trader Program because
the Exchange does not wish to encourage or allow the Frequent Trader
Program to be applied retroactively. Additionally, by establishing a
clear process for identifying transactions in order for them to qualify
for the Frequent Trader Program rebates, the proposed rule change
eliminates confusion, thereby removing an impediment to and perfecting
the mechanism of a free and open market system. The establishment of
this process will also make it easier for CBOE to administer the
Frequent Trader Program and ensure that it is appropriately assessed
when it is applicable.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the proposed change
applies uniformly to all executing TPHs of Customer FTID orders and
because it provides for a clear process to rectify scenarios in which a
Customer's FTID was not applied to that Customer's order. The Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change will not cause an unnecessary
burden on intermarket competition because it only applies to trading on
CBOE. To the extent that the proposed changes make CBOE a more
attractive marketplace for market participants at other exchanges, such
market participants are welcome to become CBOE market participants.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \13\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \14\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. Consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest, waiver of the
30-day operative delay will facilitate the implementation of the
Frequent Trader Program and allow executing TPHs to use the Exchange's
process to claim rebates for their customers. Therefore, the Commission
hereby waives the operative delay and designates the proposal operative
upon filing.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \15\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2016-037 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2016-037. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2016-037, and should be
submitted on or before May 17, 2016.
    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-09595 Filed 4-25-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46682-46685]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21504]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2017-0105; FRL-9968-92-Region 4]

Air Plan Approval; Florida; Permitting Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing
approval of portions of five State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of Florida, Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP), through the Florida Division of Air Resource
Management, on June 23, 1999, July 1, 2011, December 12, 2011, February
27, 2013, and February 1, 2017. Florida's SIP revisions recodify,
clarify, and reorganize the State's non-title V air permitting and
compliance assurance program regulations consistent with flexibility
provided

under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA's rules which address new
source preconstruction permitting. EPA is finalizing approval of
Florida's SIP revisions on the basis that they are consistent with the
CAA and EPA's requirements for permitting air emission sources.

DATES: This rule will be effective November 6, 2017.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2017-0105. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential
Business Information or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michele Notarianni, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. Ms. Notarianni can be reached by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER>
and via electronic mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDEP submitted to EPA for adoption into the Florida SIP five
revisions, three of which were submitted on June 23, 1999, July 1,
2011, and February 27, 2013, as part of the State's efforts to clarify
and streamline Florida's non-title V air permitting and compliance
assurance program and to address EPA's minor source preconstruction
requirements under 40 CFR 51.160-51.164. In addition, on December 12,
2011, FDEP submitted a SIP revision to add a definition of ``North
American Industry Classification System,'' or ``NAICS,'' to the Florida
SIP. On February 1, 2017, FDEP submitted a SIP revision to address
requirements for emissions monitoring at stationary sources. The 1999
SIP submission includes amendments to 16 rule sections in the Florida
Administrative Code (F.A.C.) that were adopted by the State between
1997 and 1999 to clarify and streamline FDEP's permitting process. The
2011 SIP submission includes clarifying and corrective amendments to 11
F.A.C. rule sections affecting FDEP's permitting regulations that were
adopted by the State between 1997 and 2010. In its 2013 SIP submission,
FDEP updates the 1999 and 2011 SIP submissions by either resubmitting
or withdrawing 12 of the 16 F.A.C. rule sections originally included in
those submittals, and providing updated versions of the remaining four
rule sections for incorporation into the Florida SIP.
    In a proposed rulemaking published on August 10, 2017 (82 FR
37379), EPA proposed to approve specified portions of the five Florida
SIP revisions on June 23, 1999, July 1, 2011, December 12, 2011,
February 27, 2013, and February 1, 2017. The details of Florida's
submissions and the rationale for EPA's actions are explained in the
proposed rulemaking. Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due on or
before September 11, 2017. EPA received no adverse comments on the
proposed action. Accordingly, in this action, EPA is finalizing action
regarding the relevant regulations (or portions thereof) from these
five SIP submissions.

II. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of Florida
Chapters 62-210.200 ``Definitions,'' which was state effective 3/28/12;
62-210.310 ``Air General Permits,'' state effective 6/29/11; 62-210.350
``Public Notice and Comment,'' state effective 10/12/08; 62-296.100
``Purpose and Scope,'' state effective 10/6/08; 62-296.405 ``Fossil
Fuel Steam Generators with More Than 250 Million Btu Per Hour Heat
Input,'' state effective 3/2/99; 62-296.406 ``Fossil Fuel Steam
Generators with Less Than 250 Million Btu Per Hour Heat Input, New and
Existing Emissions Units,'' state effective 3/2/99; 62-296.412 ``Dry
Cleaning Facilities,'' state effective 3/11/10; 62-296.414 ``Concrete
Batching Plants,'' state effective 1/10/07; 62-296.418 ``Bulk Gasoline
Plants,'' state effective 3/11/10; 62-296.500 ``Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT)--Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and
Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) Emitting Facilities,'' state effective
3/11/10; 62-296.508 ``Petroleum Liquid Storage,'' state effective 10/6/
08; 62-297.310 ``General Emissions Test Requirements,'' state effective
3/9/15; and 62-297.450 ``EPA VOC Capture Efficiency Test Procedures,''
state effective 3/2/99. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and/or at the
EPA Region 4 Office (please contact the person identified in the ``For
Further Information Contact'' section of this preamble for more
information). Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for
inclusion in the State implementation plan, have been incorporated by
reference by EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final
rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference by
the Director of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP
compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Final Action

    EPA is finalizing approval of portions of the five Florida SIP
revisions submitted to EPA on June 23, 1999, July 1, 2011, December 12,
2011, February 27, 2013, and February 1, 2017, on the basis that they
are consistent with the CAA and EPA's requirements for permitting air
emission sources.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the Act. This action merely
approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that
reason, these actions:
     Are not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     do not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

     are certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     do not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     are not an economically significant regulatory action
based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     are not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     are not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA and
     do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by December 5, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur dioxide,
Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: September 22, 2017.
Onis ``Trey'' Glenn, III,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart K--Florida

0
2. Section 52.520(c) is amended:
0
a. Under the heading ``Chapter 62-210 Stationary Sources--General
Requirements'' by revising the entries for ``62-210.200'', ``62-
210.310'' and ``62-210.350'';
0
b. Under the heading ``Chapter 62-210 Stationary Sources--General
Requirements'' by removing the entry for ``62-210.920'';
0
c. Under the heading ``Chapter 62-296 Stationary Sources--Emission
Standards'' by revising the entries for ``62-296.100'', ``62-296.405'',
``62-296.406'', ``62-296.412'', ``62-296.414'', ``62-296.418'', ``62-
296.500'' and ``62-296.508'', and
0
d. Under the heading ``Chapter 62-297 Stationary Sources--Emissions
Monitoring'' by revising the entries for ``62-297.310'' and ``62-
297.450''.
    The revisions read as follows:

Sec.  52.520  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                        EPA-Approved Florida Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           State
   State citation (section)        Title/subject      effective date    EPA approval date        Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Chapter 62-210 Stationary Sources--General Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
62-210.200...................  Definitions..........         3/28/12  10/6/17, [Insert      Selected definitions
                                                                       Federal Register      are approved into
                                                                       citation].            the SIP.

                                                  * * * * * * *
62-210.310...................  Air General Permits..         6/29/11  10/6/17, [Insert
                                                                       Federal Register
                                                                       citation].
62-210.350...................  Public Notice and            10/12/08  10/6/17, [Insert      Excludes revisions
                                Comment.                               Federal Register      state effective
                                                                       citation].            February 11, 1999,
                                                                                which added 62-
                                                                                210.350(1)(c) and
                                                                                62-210.350(4)(a)2,
                                                                                and revised 62-
                                                                                210.350(4)(b).

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              Chapter 62-296 Stationary Sources--Emission Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
62-296.100...................  Purpose and Scope....         10/6/08  10/6/17, [Insert
                                                                       Federal Register
                                                                       citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
62-296.405...................  Fossil Fuel Steam              3/2/99  10/6/17, [Insert
                                Generators with More                   Federal Register
                                Than 250 Million Btu                   citation].
                                Per Hour Heat Input.
62-296.406...................  Fossil Fuel Steam              3/2/99  10/6/17, [Insert
                                Generators with Less                   Federal Register
                                Than 250 Million Btu                   citation].
                                Per Hour Heat Input,
                                New and Existing
                                Emissions Units.

                                                  * * * * * * *
62-296.412...................  Dry Cleaning                  3/11/10  10/6/17, [Insert
                                Facilities.                            Federal Register
                                                                       citation].
62-296.414...................  Concrete Batching             1/10/07  10/6/17, [Insert
                                Plants.                                Federal Register
                                                                       citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
62-296.418...................  Bulk Gasoline Plants.         3/11/10  10/6/17, [Insert
                                                                       Federal Register
                                                                       citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
62-296.500...................  Reasonably Available          3/11/10  10/6/17, [Insert
                                Control Technology                     Federal Register
                                (RACT)--Volatile                       citation].
                                Organic Compounds
                                (VOC) and Nitrogen
                                Oxides (NOX)
                                Emitting Facilities.

                                                  * * * * * * *
62-296.508...................  Petroleum Liquid              10/6/08  10/6/17, [Insert      Amendments effective
                                Storage.                               Federal Register      10/6/08
                                                                       citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Chapter 62-297 Stationary Sources--Emissions Monitoring
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
62-297.310...................  General Emissions              3/9/15  10/6/17, [Insert
                                Test Requirements.                     Federal Register
                                                                       citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
62-297.450...................  EPA VOC Capture                3/2/99  10/6/17, [Insert
                                Efficiency Test                        Federal Register
                                Procedures.                            citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-21504 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 7, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 38619]
[FR Doc No: 2019-16845]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER19-2513-000]

Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing
Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization: Wilton Wind
Energy II, LLC

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced Wilton Wind
Energy II, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is August 21, 2019.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 1, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-16845 Filed 8-6-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P