[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75243-75250]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30547]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-68434; File Numbers SR-OCC-2012-14 and AN-OCC-2012-01]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Options Clearing Corporation;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1
Thereto, and Notice of No Objection to Advance Notice, Modified by
Amendment No. 1 Thereto, Relating to the Clearance and Settlement of
Over-the-Counter Options

December 14, 2012.

I. Introduction

    On August 30, 2012, the Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change SR-OCC-2012-14 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder
\2\ (``Proposed Rule Change'') and as an Advance Notice (SR-OCC-2012-
01) pursuant to Section 806(e) of Title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Act
(``Title VIII'' or ``Clearing Supervision Act'') \3\ (the Proposed Rule
Change with the Advance Notice, the ``Proposal''). The Proposed Rule
Change and Advance Notice were published for comment in the Federal
Register on September 18, 2012 \4\ and September 27, 2012,\5\
respectively. On October 26, 2012, the Commission extended the time
within which to act on the Proposal.\6\ The Commission received no
comment letters. On November 30, 2012, OCC filed Amendment No. 1 to the
Proposal.\7\ This Order approves the Proposed Rule Change and serves as
notice of no objection to the Advance Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 12 U.S.C. 5465(e).
    \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67835 (September 12,
2012), 77 FR 57602 (September 18, 2012).
    \5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67906 (September 21,
2012), 77 FR 59431 (September 27, 2012).
    \6\ Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission
Action on Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Clearance and
Settlement of Over-the-Counter Options, Release No. 34-68112
(October 26, 2012); 77 FR 66497 (November 5, 2012); Notice of
Extension of Review Period of Advance Notice to Establish the Legal
and Operational Framework for Providing Central Clearing of OTC
Index Options on the S&P 500 Index That Are Negotiated Bilaterally
in the Over-The-Counter Market and Submitted to OCC for Clearance,
Release No. 34-68111 (October 26, 2012), 77 FR 66196 (November 2,
2012).
    \7\ In Amendment No. 1, OCC proposed to amend Article XVII of
its By-laws to clarify that Section 6 of that Article, pertaining to
OTC Index Options, are inoperative until further notice by OCC, as
well as to amend Item 3 of the proposed rule change to clarify that
the clearing of OTC Options will not occur until certain
enhancements related to longer-tenor options have been approved and
implemented.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    The purpose of this Proposal is to establish a legal and
operational framework for OCC to provide central clearing of certain
OTC index options on the S&P 500 Index (``OTC S&P 500 Index
Options'').\8\ OCC will not commence clearing of OTC S&P 500 Index
Options until a subsequent proposal concerning certain enhancements to
OCC's risk modeling and risk management procedures (``Risk Management
Proposal'') \9\ is approved by the Commission and implemented by
OCC.\10\ OCC anticipates using the same legal and operational framework
as contained in the Proposal for clearing additional OTC equity options
or OTC equity index options in the future, subject to the requisite
regulatory approvals.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The proposed rule change replaces a previously proposed rule
change which was withdrawn by OCC. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 34-66090 (January 3, 2012), 77 FR 1107 (January 9, 2012)
(SR-OCC-2011-19).
    \9\ OCC is in the process of implementing risk modeling
enhancements with respect to longer-tenor options, including OTC S&P
500 Index Options. The enhancements are part of OCC's ongoing
efforts to test and improve its risk management operations with
respect to all longer-tenor options that OCC currently clears. These
procedures will be submitted for review in a separate proposed rule
change and advance notice filing, and OCC represents that it will
not commence clearing of OTC S&P 500 Index Options until such
procedures have been approved and implemented. See also supra note
7.
    \10\ Notice of Filing of Advance Notice Relating to the
Clearance and Settlement of Over-the-Counter Options, Rel. No. 34-
67906 at 15 (Sept. 21, 2012), 77 FR 59431, 59434 (Sept. 27, 2012);
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Clearance
and Settlement of Over-the-Counter Options, Rel. No. 34-67835 at 15
(Sept. 12, 2012), 77 FR 57602, 57606 (Sept. 18, 2012). See also
supra note 7.
    \11\ See supra notes 9 and 10 and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

OTC Options

    OCC has entered into a license agreement with Standard & Poor's
Financial Services LLC (``S&P'') that allows OCC to clear OTC options
on three equity indices published by the S&P: The S&P 500 Index, the
S&P MidCap 400 Index, and the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. The Proposal
would allow OCC to clear only OTC S&P 500 Index Options,\12\ and only
subject to the filing and approval of the Risk Management Proposal, as
discussed above.\13\ OTC S&P 500 Index Options are limited in tenor to
between four months and five years and have minimum notional values of
either 500,000 or 100,000 times the value of the S&P 500 Index.\14\ OCC
may propose to clear OTC options on other indices and on individual
equity securities in the future, subject to Commission approval of one
or more additional rule filings. In establishing a legal and
operational framework for the potential future clearing of OTC options
referencing other equities or equity indices, the Proposal defines
``OTC option'' and ``OTC index option'' (both of which terms include
OTC S&P 500 Index Options) generically in order to simplify future
amendments to provide for additional underlying interests. As noted
above, however, the Proposal by its terms would permit only the
clearing of OTC S&P 500 Index Options,\15\ and only after the
Commission's approval and OCC's implementation of a subsequent Risk
Management Proposal.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Proposed By-laws, Section 6, Interpretations and
Policies .01, Proposed Rule Change and Advance Notice by OCC (SR-
OCC-2012-14), available at http://www.theocc.com/components/docs/legal/rules_and_bylaws/sr_occ_12_14.pdf.
    \13\ See supra notes 10 and 10 and accompanying text.
    \14\ See Proposed By-laws, Section 6, Interpretations and
Policies .01, Proposed Rule Change and Advance Notice by OCC (SR-
OCC-2012-14), available at http://www.theocc.com/components/docs/legal/rules_and_bylaws/sr_occ_12_14.pdf.
    \15\ See id. See also supra notes 9 and 10 and accompanying
text.
    \16\ See supra notes 10 and 10 and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OTC S&P 500 Index Options will be similar to exchange-traded
standardized equity index options called ``FLEX Options.'' FLEX Options
are put and call options traded on various options exchanges that allow
for customization of certain terms. For example, FLEX index Options
traded on the Chicago Board Options Exchange have six customizable
terms: (1) Underlying index, (2) put or call, (3) expiration date, (4)
exercise price, (5) American or European exercise style, and (6) method
of calculating settlement value.\17\ OCC is the issuer and guarantor of
FLEX Options and clears FLEX Options traded on multiple exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See CBOE Rule 24A.4, Terms of FLEX Options, available at
http://www.cchwallstreet.com/CBOETools/PlatformViewer.asp?selectednode=chp%5F1%5F1%5F25%5F5&manual=%2FCBOE%2Frules%2Fcboe%2Drules%2F.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Similar to FLEX Options referencing the S&P 500 Index, OTC S&P 500
Index Options will allow for customization of a limited number of
variable terms with a specified range of values that may be assigned to
each as agreed between the buyer and seller. Parties submitting
transactions in OTC Options for clearing by OCC will be able to
customize six

discrete terms: (1) Underlying index; \18\ (2) put or call; (3)
exercise price; (4) expiration date; (5) American or European exercise
style; and (6) method of calculating exercise settlement value on the
expiration date.\19\ The variable terms and permitted values will be
specified in the proposed Section 6 of Article XVII of the By-Laws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Initially, pursuant to this Proposal, the S&P 500 Index
will be the only permitted underlying index.
    \19\ The expiration date of an OTC option must fall on a
business day. The method of determining the exercise settlement
value of an OTC option on its expiration date may be either the
opening settlement value or the closing settlement value of the
underlying index (calculated by S&P using the opening or closing
price, as applicable, in the primary market of each component
security of the underlying index on the specified expiration date),
in each case as reported to OCC by CBOE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Clearing of OTC Options

    OCC proposes to clear OTC S&P 500 Index Options subject to the same
basic rules and procedures used for the clearance of listed index
options, with such modifications to reflect the unique characteristics
of OTC Options. Transactions in OTC options \20\ will not be executed
through the facilities of any exchange, but will instead be entered
into bilaterally and submitted to OCC for clearance through one or more
providers of trade affirmation services.\21\ In addition, the proposed
rules require that the counterparties to the OTC Options must be
eligible contract participants (``ECPs''), as defined in Section 3a(65)
of the Act,\22\ and Section 1a(18) of the Commodity Exchange Act,\23\
as amended (the ``CEA''). Because an OTC S&P 500 Index Option is a
``security'' as defined in the Act, the proposed rules also require
that the transactions be cleared through a clearing member of OCC that
is registered with the Commission as a broker-dealer or one of the
small number of clearing members that are ``non-U.S. securities firms''
as defined in OCC's By-Laws. OCC is not requiring clearing members to
meet any different financial standards for clearing OTC Index Options,
as defined in OCC's By-laws and Rules, than those to which they are
presently subject. However, clearing members must be specifically
approved by OCC to clear OTC Index Options pursuant to proposed new
Interpretation and Policy .11 to Section 1 of Article V in order to
ensure the operational readiness of such clearing members to clear OTC
Index Options. Clearing members seeking to clear OTC Index Options will
be required to submit a business expansion request and complete an
operational review. The operational review is to consist of an initial
meeting with the clearing member's staff to evaluate the staff's
experience, confirming the staff's familiarity with current OCC systems
and procedures, completion of an operational questionnaire, performing
a high level review of the clearing member's systems and processing
capabilities, and reviewing other pertinent operational information.
Successful testing of messaging capability between the clearing member,
the OTC Trade Source,\24\ and OCC is also necessary. These procedures
will determine whether the firm is operationally ready to clear OTC
Index Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ As noted above, the Proposal by its terms would permit only
the clearing of OTC S&P 500 Index Options, and only after the
Commission's approval and OCC's implementation of a subsequent Risk
Management Proposal. See supra notes 9, 10, and 14 and accompanying
text. Also as discussed above, while OCC anticipates using the same
legal and operational framework contained in the Proposal to clear
additional OTC equity options or OTC equity index options in the
future, OCC could only do so upon OCC's filing and the Commission's
approval of one or more additional rule filings.
    \21\ See infra note 266 and accompanying text.
    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(65).
    \23\ 7 U.S.C. 1a(18).
    \24\ See infra note 266 and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Exercise of an OTC S&P 500 Index Option will be settled by payment
of cash by the assigned writer and to the exercising holder through
OCC's cash settlement system on the business day following exercise in
exactly the same manner as is the case with exercise settlement of
listed index options. As in the case of listed index options, the
exercise-settlement amount will be equal to the difference between the
current value of the underlying interest and the exercise price of the
OTC Index Option, times the multiplier that determines the size of the
OTC Index Option. In the case of OTC S&P 500 Index Options, the
multiplier will be fixed at 1 (i.e., equal to the value of the S&P 500
Index).
    OTC S&P 500 Index Options may be carried in a clearing member's
firm account, in market-maker accounts or in its securities customers'
account, as applicable. Although customer positions in OTC S&P 500
Index Options will be carried in the securities customers' account (an
omnibus account), OCC will use a ``customer ID'' to identify positions
of individual customers based on information provided by clearing
members.\25\ However, positions are not presently intended to be
carried in individual customer sub-accounts, and positions in OTC S&P
500 Index Options will be margined at OCC in the omnibus customers'
account on the same basis as listed options. If a clearing member takes
the other side of a transaction with its customer in an OTC S&P 500
Index Option, the transaction will result in the creation of a long or
short position (as applicable) in the clearing member's customers'
account and the opposite short or long position in the clearing
member's firm account. The positions could also be includable in the
internal cross-margining account, subject to any necessary regulatory
approvals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ Such customer IDs are necessary in order to allow OCC to
comply with certain terms of OCC's license agreement with S&P. As
described further below, customer IDs will be used for other
purposes as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OCC has stated that OTC S&P 500 Index Options will be fungible with
each other to the extent that there are OTC S&P 500 Index Options in
the system with identical terms. However, OCC has stated that it will
not treat OTC S&P 500 Index Options as fungible with index options
listed on any exchange, even if an OTC S&P 500 Index Option has terms
identical to the terms of the exchange-listed option.
    Clearing members that carry customer positions in cleared OTC S&P
500 Index Options will be subject to all OCC rules governing OCC-
cleared options generally, as well as all applicable rules of the
Commission and of any self-regulatory organization, including the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (``FINRA''), of which they are
a member. Section 8 of Article III of OCC's By-Laws provides that,
subject to the By-Laws and Rules, ``the Board of Directors may suspend
Clearing Members and may prescribe and impose penalties for the
violation of the By-Laws or the Rules of the Corporation, and it may,
by Rule or otherwise, establish all disciplinary procedures applicable
to Clearing Members and their partners, officers, directors, and
employees.'' As a condition to admission, Section 3(c) of Article V of
the By-Laws provides that a clearing member must agree, among other
things, to ``pay such fines as may be imposed on it in accordance with
the By-Laws and Rules.'' OCC Rule 305 permits OCC to impose
restrictions on the clearing activities of a clearing member if it
finds that the financial or operational condition of the clearing
member makes it necessary or advisable to do so for the protection of
OCC, other clearing members, or the general public. OCC Rule 1201(a)
provides that OCC ``may censure, suspend, expel or limit the
activities, functions or operations of any Clearing Member for any
violation of the By-Laws and Rules or its agreements with the
Corporation.'' In addition to, or in lieu of, such actions, OCC is
permitted under the same paragraph to impose fines. OCC Rule 1202(b)
establishes procedures for

taking any such disciplinary actions. The foregoing provisions are
sufficient to permit OCC to fine or otherwise discipline a clearing
member that fails to abide by OCC's By-Laws and Rules applicable to OTC
options, or to prohibit such clearing member from continuing to clear
such options.

MarkitSERV Trade Submission Mechanics

    The trade data for an OTC S&P 500 Index Option trade will be
entered into the system of MarkitSERV or another trade confirmation/
affirmation vendor approved by OCC for this purpose (``OTC Trade
Source'').\26\ While MarkitSERV will be the only OTC Trade Source at
launch, OCC has stated that it will permit additional OTC Trade Sources
in the future in response to sufficient market demand from OCC's
clearing members and subject to the ability of any such OTC Trade
Source to meet OCC's requirements for operational readiness and
interoperability with OCC's systems, as well as requirements with
respect to relevant business experience and reputation, adequate
personnel and expertise, financial qualification, and such other
factors as OCC deems relevant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ MarkitSERV, LLC is owned by Markit Group Limited, Markit
Group Holdings Limited and The Depository Trust & Clearing
Corporation. MarkitSERV Limited is a wholly-owned U.K. subsidiary of
MarkitSERV, LLC. MarkitSERV, LLC and MarkitSERV Limited
(collectively, ``MarkitSERV'') provide derivatives transaction
processing, electronic confirmation, portfolio reconciliation
services, and other related services for firms that conduct business
in the over-the-counter derivatives markets through a variety of
electronic systems, including the MarkitWire system. MarkitWire,
owned by MarkitSERV Limited, is an OTC derivatives electronic
confirmation/affirmation service offered by MarkitSERV as part of
its post-trade processing suite of products. The role of MarkitSERV
and MarkitWire in OCC's clearing of OTC options is described in
further detail below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    MarkitSERV will provide an interface to OCC that allows OCC to
receive messages containing details of transactions in OTC S&P 500
Index Options submitted for clearing by clearing members with access to
MarketWire and also allows OCC to transmit messages to MarkitWire
participants identifying the status of submitted transactions.
MarkitSERV will use a ``confirmation/affirmation'' procedure in which
one party to the trade enters the trade data to the MarkitWire
platform, which issues a confirmation to the counterparty to be
affirmed, rejected, or requested to be revised. If the trade details
are confirmed, the trade will then be submitted to OCC for clearance
and MarkitSERV will affirm such submission to both parties. OCC will
then validate the trade information for compliance with applicable
requirements, such as the identification of an account of an eligible
clearing member in which each side of the trade will be cleared, that
the variable terms are within permissible ranges, and that minimum size
requirements under OCC's license agreement with S&P are met.\27\ This
validation will be completed by OCC immediately upon submission. OCC's
clearing system will automatically accept the trade if it passes the
validation process and will otherwise reject it. Once accepted, a trade
is guaranteed by OCC.\28\ A trade that is rejected by OCC may be
corrected and submitted as a new transaction. Parties may submit trades
for clearance that were entered into bilaterally at any time in the
past, provided that the eligibility for clearance will be determined as
of the date the trade is submitted to OCC for clearance.\29\ Clearing
members and customers with access to MarkitSERV will be able to
determine whether a trade has been accepted or rejected both through
MarkitSERV and, in the case of clearing members, through their
interface with OCC's clearing system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ MarkitWire applications use product-specific templates to
simplify deal entry and negotiations. The templates specify the data
required for a given product and also the business validation rules
for each field. MarkitSERV has included OCC's validation
requirements for OTC options in its trade templates.
    \28\ Note, however, that OTC options for which the premium
payment date communicated by MarkitSERV to OCC is prior to the
business day on which the OTC option is submitted to OCC for
clearing (``Backloaded OTC Option'') will not be accepted and
guaranteed until the selling clearing member has met its initial
morning cash settlement obligations to OCC on the following business
day.
    \29\ OCC's license agreement with S&P imposes certain
requirements relating to minimum time remaining to expiration of an
OTC option.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed By-Law and Rule Changes \30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ As noted above, the Proposal by its terms would permit only
the clearing of OTC S&P 500 Index Options, and only after the
Commission's approval and OCC's implementation of a subsequent Risk
Management Proposal. See supra notes 9, 10, and 12 and accompanying
text. Also as discussed above, while OCC anticipates using the same
legal and operational framework contained in the Proposal to clear
additional OTC equity options or OTC equity index options in the
future, OCC could only do so upon OCC's filing and the Commission's
approval of one or more additional rule filings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Article I of the By-Laws contains defined terms used throughout the
By-Laws and Rules. OCC proposes to modify certain existing definitions
and include certain new definitions in order to incorporate OTC options
into existing rules and facilitate the creation of new provisions
unique to OTC options. Throughout the By-Laws and Rules, OCC proposes
to replace the term ``Exchange transaction,'' which is currently
defined in Article I, in relevant part, as ``a transaction on or
through the facilities of an Exchange for the purchase, writing or sale
of a cleared contract'' with the term ``confirmed trade'' so as to make
the relevant portions of the By-Laws and Rules applicable to
transactions in OTC options as well as listed options. ``Confirmed
trade'' is proposed to be defined in Article I to include transactions
``effected on or through the facilities of an exchange'' or ``affirmed
through the facilities of an OTC Trade Source'' in order to include
transactions in both listed options and OTC options. The current
definition of ``confirmed trade'' in OCC Rule 101 is proposed to be
deleted as unnecessary given the new definition. OCC is also proposing
to add an Interpretation and Policy to the new definition of
``confirmed trade'' in order to avoid any ambiguity concerning how such
terms should be interpreted in any such agreement.
    OCC proposes to add a new Interpretation and Policy .11 to Section
1 of Article V of the By-Laws, providing the additional criteria that
must be met by a clearing member in order to clear OTC index options.
Among these new criteria are that clearing members seeking to clear OTC
index options on underlying indices published by S&P must execute and
maintain in effect a short-form license agreement in such form as
specified from time to time by S&P.
    The Interpretations and Policies under Section 1, Article VI allow
clearing members to adjust their positions with OCC for certain
enumerated reasons. OCC proposes to amend the Interpretations and
Policies to clarify that adjustment of positions in OTC options will be
effected through a manual process (as opposed to the electronic process
available to post-trade adjustments in listed options), to the extent
permitted by OCC. For the same reason, OCC is proposing to amend OCC
Rule 403 to prohibit clearing member trade assignment (``CMTA'')
transactions in OTC options. Trade ``give-ups'' that are effected
through the CMTA process in the case of listed options will, in the
case of OTC options, be effected through MarkitSERV before the trades
are submitted to OCC for clearing.
    Article XVII of the By-Laws governs index options in general and
OCC is proposing amendments to Article XVII in order to set forth the
terms applicable to the initial OTC options proposed to be cleared by
OCC--options on the S&P

500 Index--and to differentiate OTC index options from other index
options cleared by OCC. For example, certain amendments to the
definitions are necessary because OTC options will be permitted to have
a much wider range of expiration dates than exchange-traded options
(other than FLEX Options). Additional definitional amendments ensure
that OTC index options will constitute a separate class of options from
other cash-settled index options even if both index options have the
same terms and cover the same underlying interest.
    Section 3 of Article XVII provides for adjustment of the terms of
outstanding index options as necessary to reflect possible changes in
the underlying index--such as those creating a discontinuity in the
level of the index--that could theoretically make an adjustment
necessary to protect the legitimate expectations of holders and writers
of options on the index. Pursuant to paragraph (g) of Section 3, most
but not all such adjustments would be made, in the case of listed index
options, by an adjustment panel consisting of representatives of the
exchanges on which the options are traded. In the case of OTC options,
any such adjustments will be made by OCC in its sole discretion.
However, in exercising that discretion, OCC may take into consideration
any adjustment made by the adjustment panel with respect to exchange-
traded options covering the same underlying index.
    OCC proposes to add a new Section 6 to Article XVII to set forth
certain provisions unique to OTC index options, including the variable
terms allowed for OTC index options and the general limitations on such
variable terms. In general, all OTC index options must conform to the
terms and limitations set forth in Section 6, and additional specific
requirements applicable to specific OTC index options will either be
set forth in the Interpretations and Policies under Section 6 or
published separately on OCC's Web site. Section 6 also makes clear that
although OTC index options are not fungible with exchange-traded index
options, OTC index options of the same series (i.e., options having
identical terms) will be fungible with each other. Interpretations and
Policies .01 to Section 6 would provide that only the S&P 500 Index
will have been approved by OCC as an underlying index for OTC Index
Options and would specify the additional terms for an OTC S&P 500 Index
Option.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See supra note 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Unless another exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933 (``Securities Act'') \32\ is available, OCC
intends to rely upon Rule 506 of Regulation D \33\ under the Securities
Act, which is a safe harbor under the Securities Act exemption in
Section 4(a)(2) \34\ for offerings by an issuer not involving a public
offering.\35\ OCC represents that it intends to satisfy the conditions
of Rule 506 of Regulation D as in effect at the time OCC relies upon
the safe harbor. OTC Index Options will be available for purchase only
by highly sophisticated investors that are both ``eligible contract
participants,'' as defined in Section 3a(65) of the Act,\36\ and
``accredited investors,'' as defined in Rule 501(a) under Regulation
D.\37\ Accordingly, Section 6(f) of Article XVII will establish that
clearing members will be deemed to have made a number of
representations and warranties to OCC in connection with their
activities in OTC options each time they affirm a confirmed trade
entered into an OTC Trade Source. These representations and warranties
include, among others, that (i) the offer and sale of the OTC Index
Option are exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities
Act; (ii) in the case where the transaction is effected for the account
of a customer, the customer is an ECP, as defined in Section 3a(65) of
the Act; (iii) unless OCC notifies clearing members that the OTC Index
Options will no longer be offered and sold pursuant to Rule 506 of
Regulation D under the Securities Act, the clearing member has not
offered or sold the OTC Index Options to any person that is not an
``accredited investor'', as defined in Rule 501(a) under Regulation D
and has otherwise complied with applicable conditions to the exemption
set forth in Rule 506; and (vi) unless OCC notifies clearing members
that such restriction no longer applies, the clearing member has not
offered or sold the OTC Index Options by any form of general
solicitation or general advertising that, at the time of such
activities, is or may be deemed to constitute general solicitation or
general advertising, as described in Rule 502(c) of Regulation D.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ 15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.
    \33\ 17 CFR 230.506.
    \34\ 15 U.S.C. 77d(a)(2).
    \35\ The OCC submitted a rulemaking petition requesting
exemptions under the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, and the Trust
Indenture Act. See SEC File No. 4-644 (submitted January 13, 2012),
available at http://www.sec.gov/rules/petitions/2012/petn4-644.pdf.
This Order does not address the relief requested under the
rulemaking petition, nor does it represent a position on the
availability of any exemption under the Securities Act.
    \36\ 15 U.S.C. 77c(a)(65).
    \37\ 17 CFR 230.501.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, each clearing member would represent and warrant to
OCC that the transaction has been effected by the clearing member in
accordance with, the clearing member's participation in such
transaction is in compliance with, and the clearing member will
continue with respect to such transaction to comply with, all
applicable laws and regulations including, without limitation, all
applicable rules and regulations of the Commission, of FINRA, and any
other regulatory or self-regulatory organization to which the clearing
member is subject.
    Chapter IV of the OCC's Rules sets forth the requirements for
reporting of confirmed trades to OCC, and OCC Rule 401 thereunder
governs reporting of transactions in listed options by participant
Exchanges. OCC is proposing to add new Rule 404 to govern the details
of reporting of confirmed trades in OTC options by an OTC Trade Source.
    OCC has stated that positions in OTC options will generally be
margined in the same manner as positions in listed options using STANS
and pursuant to Chapter VI of the OCC's Rules. However, OCC proposes to
amend its Rule 611 to establish different procedures for the
segregation of long positions in OTC options for margining
purposes.\38\ Long positions in listed options are held in a clearing
member's customers' account or firm non-lien account and by default are
deemed to be ``segregated,'' meaning that they are not subject to OCC's
lien and are given no collateral value when determining the margin
requirement in the account. Such positions may be unsegregated only
when a clearing member instructs OCC to unsegregate a long position and
represents to OCC that the long position is part of a spread
transaction carried for

a single customer whose margin requirement on the corresponding short
position has been reduced in recognition of the spread. OCC will then
unsegregate the long position and so reduce OCC's margin requirement.
However, in case of long positions in OTC options that are carried in a
clearing member's customers' account and for which OCC has received a
customer ID, OCC proposes that it will automatically unsegregate such
long positions if OCC identifies a qualifying short position in OTC
options carried under the same customer ID. Clearing members will not
be required to give an affirmative instruction to OCC to unsegregate a
long position in OTC options or make a separate representation
regarding the spread transaction. Instead, by carrying a qualifying
spread position in a customer account, clearing members are deemed to
have represented to OCC that the customer's margin has been reduced in
recognition of the spread. Based on discussion with its clearing
members, OCC's understanding is that, in practice, broker-dealers
reduce customers' margin requirements to reflect spread positions.
Therefore, OCC has stated that it believes automatic recognition of
such spreads by OCC together with the deemed representation will
greatly increase operational efficiency while providing equal assurance
that long positions in OTC options will be unsegregated only if an
identified customer will receive the benefit of the reduced margin
required for spread transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ Specifically, Proposed OCC Rule 611(d) provides:
    (d) In the case of a long position in OTC options carried in the
securities customers' account of a Clearing Member and for which the
Corporation has received a customer ID, to the extent permitted
under all applicable laws and regulations (including the rules of
the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. and any other
regulatory or self-regulatory organization to which the Clearing
Member is subject), the Corporation shall automatically unsegregate
such long position to the extent that the Corporation identifies a
qualifying spread position where the short leg of the spread is
carried under the same customer ID. The Clearing Member shall not
carry a qualifying spread position for a customer unless the
customer's margin requirement has been reduced in recognition of the
spread, and the carrying of a qualifying spread position for the
account of a customer shall constitute a representation to the
Corporation that the customer's margin has been so reduced.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OCC Rule 1001 sets forth the amount of the contribution that each
clearing member is required to make to the clearing fund. OCC proposes
to amend OCC Rule 1001(c) so that, for purposes of calculating the
daily average number of cleared contracts held by a clearing member in
open positions with OCC during a calendar month (which number is used
in turn to determine the clearing member's contribution to the clearing
fund), open positions in OTC options will be adjusted as needed to
account for any differences between the multiplier or unit of trading
with respect to OTC options relative to non-OTC options covering the
same underlying index or interest so that OTC options and non-OTC
options are given comparable weight in the computation.\39\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\ For example, the index multiplier applicable to OTC index
options on the S&P 500 Index will be fixed at 1. In comparison, the
index multiplier applicable to listed index options is 100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In general, the rules in Chapter XI governing the suspension of a
clearing member will apply equally to clearing members that transact in
OTC options. OCC Rule 1104 provides broad authority for OCC to
liquidate a suspended clearing member's margin and clearing fund
deposits ``in the most orderly manner practicable.'' OCC Rule 1106
provides similarly worded authority to close out open positions in
options and certain other cleared contacts carried by a suspended
clearing member. In 2011, the Commission approved an OCC rule change
providing OCC the express authority to use a private auction as one of
the means by which OCC may close out open positions and liquidate
margin and clearing fund deposits of a suspended clearing member.\40\
OCC has stated that it anticipates it will use this auction process for
OTC options as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-65654 (October
28, 2011), 76 FR 68238 (November 3, 2011) (SR-OCC-2011-08). OCC
subsequently filed and obtained approval for a rule change to
provide for detailed procedures for the conduct of such an auction.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-67443 (July 16, 2012), 77
FR 42784 (July 20, 2012) (SR-OCC-2012-11); Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 34-67733 (August 27, 2012), 77 FR 53241 (August 31,
2012) (approving SR-OCC-2012-11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As an additional tool to ensure its ability to close out positions
in OTC options promptly, OCC is proposing to amend OCC Rule 1106 to
provide for an alternative auction procedure specifically applicable
only to OTC index options and related positions hedging, or hedged by,
OTC index options (``OTC Options Auction''). An OTC Options Auction
would be used only in unusual circumstances where OCC determines it is
not feasible to close out open positions in OTC index options through
the other means provided in OCC's Rules and By-Laws.\41\ The amendments
to OCC Rule 1106 summarize the OTC Options Auction procedures and
incorporate by reference the detailed procedures contained in a
document entitled ``OTC Options Auction Procedures,'' which will be
posted on the OCC's Web site and otherwise made available to clearing
members upon request of OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ OCC anticipates that it would propose to apply these
procedures to other OTC derivatives that may be cleared by OCC in
the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OCC Rule 1106(e)(2)(C) clarifies that, in the event that the
liquidation of a clearing member results in a deficiency that would
otherwise result in a proportionate charge against the clearing fund
contributions of other clearing members, each OTC Index Option Member
(as defined below) that failed to purchase or assume its share of an
auction portfolio will be the first to absorb the deficiency, through a
``Priority Charge'' against such clearing members' clearing fund
contributions. The Priority Charge is a ``first loss'' mechanism, and
is not intended to increase a clearing member's total maximum exposure
to OCC.
    Under the OTC Options Auction procedures, all clearing members
authorized to clear transactions in OTC index options (``OTC Index
Option Members''), other than the defaulting clearing member, will be
required to participate in the OTC Options Auction by submitting
competitive bids for all or a portion of the defaulting clearing
member's OTC index option portfolio. Each such participant will be
subject to a minimum participation level based on the participant's
proportionate share of the total ``risk margin'' requirement posted by
all OTC Index Options Members in the previous month for all positions
(not limited to OTC option positions) held in accounts eligible to hold
OTC options positions (``OTC Eligible Accounts''), after removing the
defaulting clearing member.\42\ This method of calculating the minimum
participation level in the OTC Options Auction results in all OTC Index
Option Members being required to participate in the OTC Options Auction
based on their clearing activity related to all positions in OTC
Eligible Accounts. Required participation ensures that the OTC Options
Auction will have sufficient participants authorized to clear
transactions in OTC index options and that the most active clearing
members in OTC index options will submit bids for the largest
percentage of the auction portfolio, increasing the likelihood of the
acquisition of OTC index options positions by clearing members with
appropriate financial strength, risk management capabilities, and
trading expertise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ This minimum participation level will be multiplied by 1.15
to calculate each participant's minimum bid size, such that the sum
of all participants' bids will equal 115% of the auction portfolio,
in order to increase the likelihood that the entire auction
portfolio will be allocated to participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Each participant may submit bids at varying quantities and varying
prices, so long as the participant's bids equal or exceed its minimum
participation level. A participant may use bids from non-OTC Index
Options Members and non-clearing members in order to meet its minimum
participation level, subject to certain OCC requirements including that
it guarantee the performance of such third parties. Each bid will
indicate what percentage of the auction portfolio the participant is
bidding on and the amount of the bid. Bids will be stated in terms of a
price for the entire auction portfolio, and may be either positive or

negative. (Negative bids imply an auction portfolio that has a negative
net asset value and indicate how much OCC would be required to pay the
participant to assume the relevant percentage of the auction
portfolio.) OCC will rank the submitted bids from best to worst and the
auction portfolio will be allocated among the bidding participants
accordingly until the auction portfolio is exhausted. The bid price
that is sufficient to clear the entire auction portfolio will become
the single price to be used for all winning bids, even if a
participant's stated bid was better.
    In order to provide a strong incentive to ensure competitive
bidding by the OTC Index Option Members required to participate in an
OTC Options Auction, OTC Index Options Members who fail to win their
minimum participation in the auction will be subject to a potential
priority charge against its clearing fund contribution. If all OTC
Options Auction participants submit bids such that each receives an
allocation of OTC index options positions equal to its minimum
participation level, no priority charge will be made regardless of
whether or not there is a liquidation shortfall. If a liquidation
shortfall remains after any priority charges, or if no priority charges
were required, OCC will then make a proportionate charge against the
clearing fund contributions of all clearing members, including those
that participated in the OTC Options Auction, in the usual manner
pursuant to Section 5 of Article VIII of OCC's By-Laws.
    In order to protect the estate of the suspended clearing member,
OCC reserves some discretion in supervising the auction. In the event
that the bid price that clears the entire auction portfolio is
determined by OCC to be an outlier bid, OCC may choose as the winning
bid a price that clears at least 80% of the auction portfolio. The
remaining auction portfolio will then be re-auctioned as described
above.

Impact of Clearing OTC Options on Other OCC-Cleared Products

    An OTC option may have economic characteristics that are
substantially similar or identical to the characteristics of options in
series of listed options that OCC clears. While it is possible that in
any given instance a market participant may elect to enter into an OTC
S&P 500 Index Option in lieu of an economically similar listed product,
OCC has stated that it does not believe that its clearing of OTC
options will adversely affect the efficiency or liquidity of the listed
markets. According to OCC, the OTC options markets accommodate a
variety of commercial and other needs of market participants, including
the ability to customize the terms of transactions. While the
availability of an OCC guarantee for OTC transactions in which the
parties would otherwise be exposed to each other's creditworthiness may
cause transactions that currently occur in the non-cleared OTC markets
to migrate to the cleared-OTC markets, OCC does not believe it will
cause significant migration from the listed markets to the cleared-OTC
options markets. OCC has stated that the limitation of the OTC options
markets to ECPs as well as the significant minimum transaction size and
tenor requirements that are applicable to OTC options under the S&P
License Agreement will limit their use appropriately and should help to
ensure that there is no substantial migration from the listed markets
to the OTC markets for this product. OCC has stated that the existing
bilateral OTC options markets have existed for years alongside the
listed options markets, and OCC believes that dealers in such bilateral
options often use the listed markets to hedge positions taken in such
bilateral options and other OTC derivatives.

III. Analysis of the Proposed Rule Change

    Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \43\ directs the Commission to
approve a proposed rule change of a SRO if the Commission finds that
the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such
organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires, among other
things, that the rules of the clearing agency be designed to promote
the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities
transactions and, to the extent applicable, derivative agreements,
contracts, and transactions, to assure the safeguarding of securities
and funds which are in the custody or control of the clearing agency or
for which it is responsible, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a national system for the prompt and accurate clearance
and settlement of securities transactions and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.\44\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \44\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Proposal contains provisions requiring clearing members to make
representations necessary to ensure that OTC S&P 500 Index Options
trades submitted to OCC for clearing involve only parties that are
ECPs, were transacted in accordance with the conditions of Regulation D
under the Securities Act, and are in compliance with other regulatory
requirements. Consistent with the objective of OCC's safeguarding
securities and funds within its control, such provisions help to ensure
that OCC avoids clearing trades that are not in compliance with
regulatory requirements.
    The Proposal, as an initial step toward enabling OCC to provide
central clearing for OTC S&P 500 Index Options, is consistent with the
objective under Section 17A(b)(3)(A) of the Exchange Act of removing
impediments to and perfecting the mechanism of a national system for
the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities
transactions. Clearing OTC options using the existing market
infrastructure at OCC will allow market participants to retain the
benefits of the features of OTC options on the S&P 500 Index, such as
expiration dates and strike prices that can be customized to match
market participants' unique needs, while reducing less favorable
aspects such as counterparty risk. Clearing OTC S&P 500 Index Options
may also allow for capital and market efficiencies because it extends
the use of existing market infrastructure at OCC into a related new
product category, and eliminates the need for individual counterparties
to bilaterally exchange option premiums and collect and maintain margin
on a daily basis. As such, cleared OTC S&P 500 Index Options should
represent a safer and more efficient use of capital than their
uncleared counterpart.
    Additionally, clearing OTC S&P 500 Index Options should benefit the
markets and regulators by centralizing and allowing for access to
information about the OTC markets that has otherwise been unavailable.
    The Proposal is consistent with the protection of customers and the
public interest. Only OTC S&P 500 Index Options between counterparties
that are ECPs and that meet the notional minimums and other OCC
requirements, as well as the conditions of Rule 506 of Regulation D
under the Securities Act and other regulatory requirements, will be
eligible for clearing by OCC. In addition, customers are expected
benefit from substituting their credit exposure to a clearing member
with exposure to OCC itself.
    Although customer positions in OTC S&P 500 Index Options will be
carried in an omnibus account, OCC will use a ``customer ID'' to
identify OTC S&P 500 Index Options positions of individual customers
based on information provided by the clearing member. This should allow
customers holding OTC

S&P 500 Index Options to benefit from additional capital efficiencies
resulting from OCC's ability to unsegregate and offset long positions
in OTC S&P 500 Index Options with qualifying short spread positions
belonging to the same customer without compromising customer
protections.\45\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \45\ See supra 38 and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Proposal is in the public interest in that it
represents an initial step in enabling OCC to provide central clearing
for OTC S&P 500 Index Options, which ultimately should help to reduce
systemic risk. Allowing for the substitution of OCC as the buyer for
every seller and the seller for every buyer should reduce bilateral
credit risk, replacing it with the credit risk of the more robustly
risk-managed central counterparty. Thus, clearing OTC S&P 500 Index
Options could potentially decrease risk to end-users of such products
and, as a result, decrease systemic risk overall.
    The Proposal is designed to bring about the clearing of options in
sizes that are not already traded in the listed (cleared) markets.
While the availability of an OCC guarantee for OTC transactions in
which the parties would otherwise be exposed to each other's credit
risk could cause transactions that currently occur in the listed
markets to migrate to less transparent cleared-OTC markets, OCC has
indicated that it does not believe this will be the case for OTC S&P
500 Index Options. The limitation to ECPs, as well as the significant
minimum transaction size and tenor requirements established as part of
OCC's license with S&P, are intended to minimize and should limit
migration of index options referencing the S&P 500 Index from the
listed to the OTC markets. OTC S&P 500 Index Options will have a
minimum notional value of $500,000 times the value of the S&P 500 Index
for initial maturities greater than four months but less than or equal
to nine months, and a minimum notional value of at least $100,000 times
the value of the S&P 500 Index for initial maturities greater than nine
months but less than three years after the date the trade was
originally executed.\46\ The Commission expects to monitor the clearing
of OTC S&P 500 Index Options and the trading of equivalent options on
listed markets to consider the possible impact the clearing of OTC S&P
500 Index Options may have on the listed markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \46\ The value of the S&P 500 Index has hovered around 1,400
points in recent months; therefore, the current notional values of
such minimum transaction amounts are approximately $700,000,000 and
$140,000,000, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OCC has stated, and the Commission notes, that the existing
bilateral OTC options markets have existed for years alongside the
listed options markets and believes that dealers in bilateral options
often use the listed markets to hedge positions taken in bilateral
options and other OTC derivatives.
    The Commission believes OCC's clearing of OTC S&P 500 Index Options
can lead to greater efficiency. Increases in efficiency may be achieved
through lower transaction costs and appropriately risk-based margin
reductions for clearing members and customers. Clearing of OTC S&P 500
Index Options will increase the volume of transactions cleared at OCC
and should thereby reduce transaction costs.
    Another improvement in efficiency will come from margin offsets,
which will free up costly capital for other uses. In particular, in
clearing OTC S&P 500 Index Options, clearing members would be expected
to gain margin efficiencies by (i) clearing in the same account both
OTC contracts and the hedges to those positions that are traded on the
listed markets; and (ii) netting positions and/or obtaining margin
offsets among OTC positions in the same account that would otherwise be
spread across multiple accounts and OTC counterparties. Customers may
gain margin efficiencies from OCC's ability to identify unsegregated
long and short positions associated with the same customer ID. By
moving OTC S&P 500 Index Options to OCC for clearing, OCC clearing
members and their customers trading these products may be expected to
benefit from reduced counterparty credit risk by introducing OCC as
central counterparty.
    Finally, central clearing of OTC derivatives will bring more
transparency for regulators concerning a market that is presently more
asymmetric in terms of information available to regulators than the
exchange-traded derivatives market. The Commission believes that the
introduction of OTC S&P 500 Index Options for clearing by OCC should
result in OCC and the Commission having more complete information
regarding options market activity and clearing member positions
overall. This should assist OCC in its risk management practices and
the Commission in its supervisory and other regulatory efforts.
    The impact of OCC's clearing of OTC S&P 500 Index Options on
capital formation is not as direct as it is on efficiency and
competition. Derivative contracts are risk management products used to
hedge different risks, a practice that supports the investments that
lead to capital formation. However, it is unclear whether the effects
of the Proposal would be large enough to affect capital formation.

IV. Analysis of the Advance Notice

Standard of Review

    A registered clearing agency that has been designated as a
systemically important financial market utility (``FMU'') by the
Financial Stability Oversight Council (``FSOC'') \47\ must provide
advance notice of all changes to its rules, procedures or operations
that could, as defined in the rules of the supervisory agency,
materially affect the nature or level of risk presented by the clearing
agency.\48\ Absent an extension or request for additional information,
as discussed in greater detail below, the Commission is required to
notify the clearing agency of any objection regarding the proposed
change within the 60 day time frame established by Title VIII.\49\ A
designated clearing agency may not implement a change to which its
supervisory agency has objected; \50\ however, the clearing agency is
explicitly permitted to implement a change if it has not received an
objection from its supervisory agency within the same 60 day time
period.\51\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \47\ On July 18, 2012, the FSOC designated OCC as a systemically
important FMU. See Financial Stability Oversight Council, 2012
Annual Report 145 (2012).
    \48\ 12 U.S.C. 5465(e). See also, Process for Submissions for
Review of Security-Based Swaps for Mandatory Clearing and Notice
Filing Requirements for Clearing Agencies; Technical Amendments to
Rule 19b-4 and Form 19b-4 Applicable to All Self-Regulatory
Organizations, Rel. No. 34-63557 (December 15, 2010), 75 FR 82490
(December 30, 2010) (Proposing Release); Rel. No. 34-67286 (June 28,
2012), 77 FR 41602 (July 13, 2012) (Adopting Release).
    \49\ 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(E).
    \50\ 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(F).
    \51\ 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(G).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Although Title VIII does not specify a standard that the Commission
must apply to determine whether to object to an advance notice, the
Commission believes that the purpose of Title VIII, stated under
Section 802(b),\52\ is relevant to the review of advance notices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ 12 U.S.C. 5461(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The stated purpose of Title VIII is to mitigate systemic risk in
the financial system and promote financial stability, by (among other
things) authorizing the Federal Reserve Board to promote uniform risk
management standards for systemically important FMUs, and providing an
enhanced role for the Federal Reserve Board in the supervising of risk
management standards for systemically important

FMUs.\53\ Therefore, the Commission believes that when reviewing
advance notices related for FMUs, the consistency of an advance notice
with Title VIII may be judged principally by reference to the
consistency of the advance notice with applicable rules of the Federal
Reserve Board governing payment, clearing, and settlement activity of
the designated FMU.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \53\ 12 U.S.C. 5461(b).
    \54\ See Financial Market Utilities, 77 FR 45907 (Aug. 2, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 805(a) requires the Federal Reserve Board and authorizes
the Commission to prescribe standards for the payment, clearing, and
settlement activities of FMUs designated as systemically important, in
consultation with the supervisory agencies. Section 805(b) of the
Clearing Supervision Act \55\ requires that the objectives and
principles for the risk management standards prescribed under Section
805(a) shall be to:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \55\ 12 U.S.C. 5464(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Promote robust risk management and safety and soundness;
     Reduce systemic risks; and
     Support the stability of the broader financial system.
    The relevant rules of the Federal Reserve Board prescribing risk
management standards for designated FMUs by their terms do not apply to
designated FMUs that are clearing agencies registered with the
Commission.\56\ Therefore, the Commission believes that the objectives
and principles by which the Federal Reserve Board is authorized to
promulgate such rules, as expressed in Section 805(b) of Title
VIII,\57\ are the appropriate standards at this time by which to
evaluate advance notices.\58\ Accordingly, the analysis set forth below
is organized by reference to the stated objectives and principles in
Section 805(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \56\ 12 CFR 234.1(b).
    \57\ 12 U.S.C. 5464(b).
    \58\ The risk management standards that have been adopted by the
Commission in Rule 17Ad-22 are substantially similar to those of the
Federal Reserve Board applicable to designated FMUs other than those
designated clearing organizations registered with the CFTC or
clearing agencies registered with the Commission. See Clearing
Agency Standards, Exchange Act Release No. 68080 (Oct. 22, 2012), 77
FR 66220 (November 2, 2012). To the extent such Commission standards
are in effect at the time advance notices are reviewed in the
future, the analysis of clearing agency rule filings under the
Exchange Act would incorporate such standards directly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Promote Robust Risk Management and Safety and Soundness

    By establishing the legal and operational framework for central
clearing of OTC S&P 500 Index Options, the Proposal paves the way for
shifting counterparty credit risk stemming from the over-the-counter
trading of these products between bilateral counterparties to OCC. As a
central counterparty that collects margin and mutualizes the risk of
loss among its members in the event of a member default, OCC is
generally expected to be better situated to manage the risks associated
with OTC S&P 500 Index Options than the original bilateral
counterparties. By laying the groundwork for OCC's clearing of OTC S&P
500 Index Options, the Proposal is consistent with the objective of
promoting safety and soundness.
    With regard to the credit risk that OCC would face once it begins
to clear OTC S&P 500 Index Options, changes in membership or additional
trading in OTC S&P 500 Index Options that results from the OTC S&P 500
Index Options being available for clearing (i.e., is not listed traffic
that is migrating to OCC) could increase OCC's total exposure to its
members and hence credit risk to OCC. On the other hand, credit risk to
OCC could decrease because, by clearing OTC S&P 500 Index Options, OCC
would have better visibility into the OTC S&P 500 Index Options
positions of its members and thereby be better able to monitor its
members' financial conditions, thus improving its own credit risk
management. OCC's financial risks are managed through a set of
financial safeguards, including strict membership rules, the collection
of high-quality collateral, and additional assessment powers that
protect OCC in the event of a default by a member.

Reduce Systemic Risks

    As discussed above, the Proposal would allow OCC to lay the
groundwork for clearing OTC S&P 500 Index Options. Substitution of a
central counterparty as a buyer to each seller and seller to each buyer
is expected to reduce counterparty risk inherent in the markets for OTC
derivatives, including OTC options. To the extent the Proposal
eventually leads to eliminating bilateral credit risk in OTC S&P 500
Index Options and replacing it with the credit risk of OCC, the more
robustly risk-managed central counterparty, the Proposal should
decrease risk to end-users of such products and, as a result, should
reduce systemic risk overall.

Support the Stability of the Broader Financial System

    OCC is the only central counterparty currently clearing exchange-
listed options; any prolonged interruption to these services likely
would prevent the exchanges from trading until they were restored. As
such, OCC plays a primary role in the trading and clearing of options
in the United States. OCC also maintains relationships with financial
market utilities, settlement banks, clearing members, credit facility
lenders, custodians, exchanges, cross-margining entities, and pricing
vendors.
    OTC options directly indexed to the S&P 500 amounted to more than
$1.1 trillion as of 2010,\59\ representing a market with a significant
trading volume that currently does not reap any of the risk mitigation
benefits of central clearing. The Commission believes that, by
establishing the legal and operational framework for clearing OTC S&P
500 Index Options, the Proposal will pave the way for systemic risk
reducing benefits and thus support the stability of the broader
financial system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \59\ See Nina Mehta, Nandini Sukumar, and Jeff Kearns, Over-The-
Counter S&P 500 Index Options Will Shift to Clearinghouse in 2011,
Sept. 20, 2010, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-20/over-the-counter-s-p-500-index-options-will-shift-to-clearinghouse-in-2011.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\60\ that the Proposed Rule Change (File No. SR-OCC-2012-14), as
Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto, be and hereby is approved as of
the date of this order, provided that OCC will not commence clearing of
OTC S&P 500 Index Options until the Risk Management Proposal referenced
above is filed by OCC, approved by the Commission, and implemented by
OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \60\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore noticed, pursuant to Section 806(e)(1)(I) of the
Clearing Supervision Act,\61\ that the Commission does not object to
proposed rule change (File No. AN-OCC-2012-01), as Modified by
Amendment No. 1 Thereto, provided that OCC will not commence clearing
of OTC S&P 500 Index Options until the Risk Management Proposal
referenced above is filed by OCC, approved by the Commission, and
implemented by OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \61\ 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(I).

    By the Commission.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-30547 Filed 12-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: November 1, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 211)]
[Notices]
[Page 64260]
[DOCID:fr01no06-59]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP06-34-001]

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Filing

October 25, 2006.
    Take notice that on October 20, 2006, Transcontinental Gas Pipe
Line Corporation (Transco), Post Office Box 1396, Houston, Texas 77251,
filed an abbreviated application, pursuant to section 7(c) of the
Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part 157 of the Commission's Rules and
Regulations to amend its Leidy to Long Island certificate issued on May
18, 2006. The application is on file with the Commission and open for
public inspection. This filing is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''

link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, please
contact FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Transco requests authorization to include in the scope of the Leidy
to Long Island Expansion Project three new gas heaters and appurtenant
facilities at its existing Long Beach meter and regulator station, and
to adjust the cost of facilities and rates. The total cost adjustment,
including $4.2 million for the heaters and appurtenant facilities, is
an increase of $5.3 million.
    Any questions regarding the application are to be directed to Scott
Turkington, Director, Rates and Regulatory, Transcontinental Gas Pipe
Line Corporation, P.O. Box 1396, Houston, Texas 77251-1396; phone
number<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any person wishing to obtain legal status by becoming a party to
the proceedings for this project should, on or before the below listed
comment date, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene in
accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary
of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the
applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of
filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant
and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the
proceeding.
    Motions to intervene, protests and comments may be filed
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper, see, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time at November 20, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-18345 Filed 10-31-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 37807]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16179]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14212-000]

Albion Hydro, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications

    On June 13, 2011, Albion Hydro, LLC, filed an application for a
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act
(FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of the Albion Hydropower
Project (Albion Dam Project or project) to be located on the Blackstone
River, in the Town of Cumberland, in Providence County, Rhode Island.
The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the
permit holder priority to file a license application during the permit
term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder to
perform any land-disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands or
waters owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed run-of-the-river project would consist of: (1) The
existing 400-foot-long, 25-foot-high Albion Dam, which is owned by the
Rhode Island Department of Transportation and includes a 300-foot-long
overflow spillway and a two-gated outlet structure; (2) an existing 55
acre reservoir having a normal storage capacity of about 235 acre-feet
(ac-ft) at elevation of 87.5 feet and a maximum storage capacity of
about 347 ac-ft; (3) a new intake on the upstream face of the existing
dam; (4) a new powerhouse that would be integrated into the existing
dam at the existing outlet structure containing a single 1.2 megawatt
bulb turbine-generating unit; (5) a new 600-foot-long, 13.8-kilovolt
transmission line extending from the new switchyard/substation to the
existing Bell Atlantic utility pole number 31-1 in Cumberland, Rhode
Island; and (6) fish passage/protection measures. The estimated annual
generation of the project would be 4.0 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Bruce DiGennaro, Managing Partner, Essex
Energy Partners, LLC, 27 Vaughan Ave., Newport, Rhode Island 02840;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: John Ramer; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-14212-000) in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: June 21, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-16179 Filed 6-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29145-29146]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11130]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2016-0137]

Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks, City of Eureka, Humboldt
Bay, Eureka, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone for the Fourth of
July Fireworks, City of Eureka in the Captain of the Port, San
Francisco area of responsibility during the dates and times noted
below. This action is necessary to protect life and property of the
maritime public from the hazards associated with the fireworks display.
During the enforcement period, unauthorized persons or vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring in the
safety zone, unless authorized by the Patrol Commander (PATCOM).

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.1191, Table 1, Item number 3, will
be enforced from 10 a.m. on July 3, 2016 through 10:40 p.m. on July 4,
2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice,
call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade Christina Ramirez, Sector San
Francisco Waterways Safety Division, U.S. Coast

Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce a safety zone
in navigable waters around and under the fireworks barge within a
radius of 100 feet during the loading, transit, and arrival of the
fireworks barge to the display location and until the start of the
fireworks display.
    From 10 a.m. until 6 p.m. on July 3, 2016 the fireworks barge will
be loaded off of Schneider Dock in Eureka, CA in approximate position
40[deg]47'50'' N, 124[deg]11'11'' W (NAD 83). The fireworks barge will
remain at the Schneider Dock until the start of the transit. From 2:30
p.m. to 3:30 p.m. on July 4, 2016 the loaded barge will transit from
Schneider Dock to the launch site off of Woodley Island near Eureka, CA
at approximate position 40[deg]48'29'' N, 124[deg]10'06'' W (NAD 83)
where it will remain until the commencement of the fireworks display.
Upon the commencement of the 25 minute fireworks display, scheduled to
begin at 10 p.m. on July 4, 2016, the safety zone will increase in size
to encompass the navigable waters around and under the fireworks barge
within a radius 1,000 feet at approximate position 40[deg]48'29'' N,
124[deg]10'06'' W (NAD 83) for the Fourth of July Fireworks, City of
Eureka in 33 CFR 165.1191, Table 1, Item number 3.
    This safety zone will be in effect from 10 a.m. on July 3, 2016
until 10:40 p.m. on July 4, 2016.
    Under the provisions of 33 CFR 165.1191, unauthorized persons or
vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring in the safety zone during all applicable effective dates and
times, unless authorized to do so by the PATCOM. Additionally, each
person who receives notice of a lawful order or direction issued by an
official patrol vessel shall obey the order or direction. The PATCOM is
empowered to forbid entry into and control the regulated area. The
PATCOM shall be designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector San
Francisco. The PATCOM may, upon request, allow the transit of
commercial vessels through regulated areas when it is safe to do so.
    This rule is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.1191 and 5 U.S.C.
552(a). In addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the Coast
Guard will provide the maritime community with extensive advance
notification of the safety zone and its enforcement period via the
Local Notice to Mariners.
    If the Captain of the Port determines that the regulated area need
not be enforced for the full duration stated in this notice, a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners may be used to grant general permission to
enter the regulated area.

    Dated: April 15, 2016.
Gregory G. Stump,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2016-11130 Filed 5-10-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P