[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 140 (Friday, July 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 42719]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17658]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[EG12-43-000, EG12-53-000, EG12-54-000, et al.]

Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator or Foreign
Utility Company Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherbino I Wind Farm LLC...............  EG12-43-000
Eagle Point Power Generation LLC.......  EG12-53-000
Cimarron Windpower II, LLC.............  EG12-54-000
Ironwood Windpower, LLC................  EG12-55-000
NRG Solar Alpine LLC...................  EG12-56-000
Cayuga Operating Company, LLC..........  EG12-57-000
Somerset Operating Company, LLC........  EG12-58-000
Copper Mountain Solar 2, LLC...........  EG12-59-000
Minok Wind, LLC........................  EG12-60-000
Senate Wind, LLC.......................  EG12-61-000
Canadian Hills Wind, LLC...............  EG12-62-000
Moore Solar, Inc.......................  FC12-6-000
Sombra Solar, Inc......................  FC12-7-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of June 2012, the status of the
above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign
Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's
regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a).

    Dated: July 12, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary..
[FR Doc. 2012-17658 Filed 7-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Date:  July 22, 2014

Meeting:  SEE Action Network Executive Group summer meeting

Rule(s) and Topics Discussed:  Clean Power Plan/111(d). Agenda is attached.

Written Materials? Yes  -  one page handout with basic information. See attached.

                                           Name          Organization         Phone Number    Registration list is attached


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28700]
[FR Doc No: E9-14246]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8919-6; Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-ORD-2009-0210]

Draft Toxicological Review of 1,4-Dioxane: In Support of the
Summary Information in the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS);
Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA published a notice in the Federal Register of Tuesday,
June 9, 2009 (74 FR, 27313-27315), announcing a listening session for
the external review draft document titled, ``Toxicological Review of
1,4-Dioxane: In Support of Summary Information on the Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS)'' (EPA/635/R-09/005). The notice contained
incorrect dates.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on the public
listening session, please contact Christine Ross, IRIS Staff, National
Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA), (8601P), U.S. EPA, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone: 703-347-
8592; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>; or e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Correction

    In the Federal Register of June 9, 2009, in FR Doc. FRL-8914-2, on
page 27314, in the second column, correct the Dates and Addresses
captions to read:

DATES: The listening session on the draft IRIS health assessment for
1,4-dioxane will be held on Monday, July 6, 2009, beginning at 9 a.m.
and ending at 4 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time. If you wish to make a
presentation at the listening session, you should register by Monday,
June 29, 2009, and indicate that you wish to make oral comments at the
session, and indicate the length of your presentation. At the time of
your registration, please indicate if you require audio-visual aid
(e.g., lap top and slide projector). In general, each presentation
should be no more than 30 minutes. If, however, there are more requests
for presentations than the allotted time will allow, then the time
limit for each presentation will be adjusted accordingly. A copy of the
agenda for the listening session will be available at the meeting. If
no speakers have registered by Monday, June 29, the listening session
will be cancelled. EPA will notify those registered to attend of the
cancellation.

ADDRESSES: The listening session on the draft 1,4-dioxane assessment
will be held at the EPA offices at Two Potomac Yard (North Building),
7th Floor, Room 7100, 2733 South Crystal Drive, Arlington, Virginia
22202. To attend the listening session, register by Monday, June 29,
2009, via the Internet at http://epa.versar.com/14dioxane/listening.
You may also register via e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(subject line:
1,4-Dioxane Listening Session), by phone<PHONE_NUMBER>, ext. 316 or
toll free at 1-800-2-VERSAR (1-800-283-7727), (ask for the 1,4-Dioxane
listening session coordinator, Stephanie Sarraino), or by faxing a
registration request to<PHONE_NUMBER> (please reference the ``1,4-
Dioxane Listening Session'' and include your name, title, affiliation,
full address and contact information).

    Dated: June 11, 2009.
Rebecca Clark,
Acting Director, National Center for Environmental Assessment.
[FR Doc. E9-14246 Filed 6-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: November 15, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 220)]
[Notices]
[Page 64218-64219]
[DOCID:fr15no07-66]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2004-0109; FRL-8156-9]

Draft List of Initial Pesticide Active Ingredients and Pesticide
Inerts to be Considered for Screening under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; second extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of June 18, 2007,
concerning the draft list of the first group of chemicals that will be
screened in the Agency's Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP).
The draft list was produced using the approach described in the
September 2005 notice, and includes chemicals that the Agency, in its
discretion, has decided should be tested first, based upon exposure
potential.The June 18, 2007 Federal Register notice provided for a 90-
day public comment period. EPA extended the comment period an
additional 60 days in the Federal Register of September 12, 2007. This
document is extending the comment period for a second time for 45 days.
The new comment period extends to December 31, 2007.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPPT-2004-0109 must be received on or before December 31, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES
in the Federal Register document of June 18, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Phillips, Office of Science
Coordination and Policy (7203M), Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and
Toxic Substances, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    The Agency included in the June 18, 2007 notice a list of those who
may be potentially affected by this action. If you have questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    When preparing comments follow the procedures and suggestions given
in Unit I.B. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION of the June 18,
2007Federal Register notice.

C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?

    To submit comments, or access the public docket, please follow the
detailed instructions as provided in Unit I.B.3. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION of the June 18, 2007 Federal Register notice. If you have
questions, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

II. What Action is EPA Taking?

    This document extends the public comment period that was originally
established in theFederal Register of June 18, 2007 (72 FR 33486) (FRL-
8129-3) and was extended in the Federal Register of September 12, 2007
(72 FR 52108) (FRL-8146-3). In the Federal Register notice of June 18,
2007, EPA announced the draft list of the first group of chemicals that
will be screened in the Agency's EDSP. The draft list was developed
using the approach described in theFederal Register notice of September
27, 2005 (70 FR 56449) (FRL-7716-9). As required by the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), all pesticides must eventually be
screened under the EDSP, and this first group is simply a starting
point. Because EPA developed this draft list of chemicals based upon
exposure potential, it should not be construed as a list of known or
likely endocrine disruptors, and it would be inappropriate to do so.
Following consideration of comments on this draft list of chemicals,
EPA will issue a Federal Register notice containing the final list of
chemicals. EPA is hereby extending the comment period, which was set to
end on November 16, 2007, to December 31, 2007.

III. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

    Section 408(p) of FFDCA requires EPA to ``develop a screening
program, using appropriate validated test systems and other
scientifically relevant information, to determine whether certain
substances may have an effect in humans that is similar to an effect
produced by a naturally occurring

estrogen, or such other endocrine effect as [EPA] may designate.'' (21
U.S.C. 346a(p)). The statute generally requires EPA to ``provide for
the testing of all pesticide chemicals.'' (21 U.S.C. 346a(p)(3)).
However, EPA is authorized to exempt a chemical, by order upon a
determination that ``the substance is anticipated not to produce any
effect in humans similar to an effect produced by a naturally occurring
estrogen.'' (21 U.S.C. 346a(p)(4)). ``Pesticide chemical'' is defined
as ``any substance that is a pesticide within the meaning of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, including all
active and inert ingredients of such pesticide.'' (21 U.S.C.
321(q)(1)).

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Chemicals, Endocrine Disruptors,
Pesticides.

    Dated: November 8, 2007.
James Jones,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and
Toxic Substances.
[FR Doc. E7-22379 Filed 11-14-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 Form for Compliance with E.O. 12866 Docket
Requirements

Title of Regulation:

  Standards of Performance for Petroleum Refineries; Proposed Rule

Contact person:   Bob Lucas

Phone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Was this  regulation reviewed by OMB under Executive Order  12866 -
Regulatory Planning and Review?

Yes          No.

If you checked “no”, you are done with this form.  Simply place it
in the docket for your regulation.  If you checked “yes”, please
fill out the remainder of the form before placing it in the docket.
Also docket any relevant documents referenced in the form.

For regulations that are checked “Yes” above:

This regulation was reviewed by OMB under Executive Order  12866 -
Regulatory Planning and Review.

Attached is the draft regulation and any other documents sent to OMB for
review, such as analyses and assessments.   E.O. 12866 requires agencies
to make these publicly available.

E.O. 12866 also requires agencies to identify the substantive changes
between the draft regulation sent to OMB for review and the regulation
subsequently announced  [Please check the appropriate box below:]

        	EPA made substantive changes to this regulation

(includes changes initiated by EPA or OMB).

Attached is a document which: (1) identifies all the substantive changes
made, and (2) notes those changes OMB suggested or recommended.

     X   	No substantive changes were made to this regulation

	Therefore, no further attachments are required..

If you have questions about this regulation, please call the EPA contact
person listed above.

퀁萏ː萑ﴰ葞ː葠ﴰ摧憟]ऀ


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 23454]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10724]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD18-12-000; Docket No. EL17-45-000; Docket No. ER18-370-
000]

Notice Inviting Post-Technical Conference Comments; Transmission
Planning Within the California Independent System Operator Corporation;
California Public Utilities Commission, Northern California Power
Agency, City and County of San Francisco, State Water Contractors,
Transmission Agency of Northern California v. Pacific Gas and Electric
Company; Southern California Edison Company

    On May 1, 2018, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission)
staff convened a technical conference to discuss the processes used by
participating transmission owners (PTOs) in the California Independent
System Operator Corporation (CAISO) to determine which transmission-
related maintenance and compliance activities/facilities, including,
but not limited to, transmission-related capital additions, are subject
to the CAISO Transmission Planning Process (TPP).
    All interested persons are invited to file post-technical
conference comments on the topics relating to the processes used by
PTOs to determine which activities/facilities are subject to the CAISO
TPP as discussed during the technical conference, including the
questions listed in the Supplemental Notice issued in this proceeding
on April 10, 2018. Commission staff is particularly interested in
comments on the following topics:
    1. Technical conference participants used the terms asset
management and asset management program during the technical
conference. Please provide a definition for those terms when they are
used to address or administer transmission capability.
    2. Describe the criteria, standards, or industry best practices
that the PTOs use in their asset management programs or activities.
    3. Technical conference participants used the terms ``incremental''
and ``incidental'' at the technical conference. Provide a definition
for those terms when they are used to describe any increases to
transmission capability that result from the use of new technology when
replacing one-for-one assets.
    4. Explain how any incremental or incidental increases to
transmission capacity are accounted for by each PTO in relation to
``asset management'' activities, and how these increases in
transmission capacity are communicated to CAISO.
    5. Technical conference participants used the terms ``expansion''
and ``enhancement'' at the technical conference. Provide the
definitions of those terms when they are used to describe certain
changes to the configuration of the CAISO transmission system resulting
from ``asset management'' activities that are subject to the CAISO TPP.
    6. Do CAISO's tariff or BPMs provide guidance and clarity to CAISO
PTOs regarding what transmission-related maintenance and compliance
activities/facilities must be considered and reviewed through CAISO's
TPP? If so, please list the relevant sections.
    7. How does each CAISO PTO decide whether to pursue reliability
related transmission-related maintenance and compliance activities/
facilities that are not required by the North American Electric
Reliability Corporation (NERC), Western Electricity Coordinating
Council (WECC), or other regulatory entities? What criteria or
parameters are used by each CAISO PTO to make this decision? Where are
such criteria or parameters documented or otherwise made available?
    8. Is there a difference between (a) the process through which each
CAISO PTO pursues solutions to transmission-related maintenance and
compliance activities/facilities that arise from NERC and WECC
reliability standards or reliability standards established by other
regulatory entities, and (b) the process through which each CAISO PTO
pursues solutions to other transmission-related maintenance and
compliance activities/facilities? If so, please explain (1) the
difference between the two processes and (2) elaborate on the reasons
for the differences.
    9. What benefits and/or concerns, if any, would arise from
introducing greater transparency and more opportunities for stakeholder
input into each CAISO PTO's asset management process in the early
stages of the assessment, ranking, and selection of particular ``asset
management'' projects? To the extent that you support additional
opportunities for stakeholder input, please describe the ideal format
and/or frequency of such opportunities.
    Commenters need not respond to all topics or questions asked.
Commenters may reference materials previously filed in the above-
captioned dockets, including the technical conference transcript, but
are encouraged to avoid repetition or replication of previous material.
Initial comments must be submitted on or before May 31, 2018, and reply
comments must be submitted on or before June 15, 2018. Initial comments
should not exceed 15 pages and reply comments should not exceed 10
pages.
    For further information, please contact individuals identified for
each topic:

Technical Information, Laura Switzer, Office of Energy Markets
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>, [email protected].
Legal Information for Docket Nos. AD18-12-000 and EL17-45-000, Linda
Kizuka, Office of the General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].
Legal Information for Docket Nos. AD18-12-000 and ER18-370-000, Susanna
Ehrlich, Office of the General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].

    Dated: May 15, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-10724 Filed 5-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Eileen Pritchard/DC/USEPA/US

05/19/2008 01:56 PM

To

<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Brian Heninger/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Joseph-J Dougherty"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Eileen Pritchard/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Mary Henigin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Nathalie Simon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Neal Fann/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rosalina Rodriguez/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Alan Rush"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

 Pb RIA Chapters for OMB

Heidi

 By this email EPA/ OAQPS is transmitting revised  Chapters 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 of the Pb NAAQS RIA, as well as  the Executive Summary, to OPEI for OMB review.

 The most recent changes in response to OMB comments are highlighted or colored.

The chapters are attached below.

Again, your contact for this package is Kathy Kaufman, who can be reached on<PHONE_NUMBER>

************************

Eileen Pritchard

EPA/OPEI/OPRM

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Room 3521-C

Mailcode 1804-A

Washington, DC 20460

(202)564-6578

(202)566-0268 - FAX

email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 32117]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14834]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-1960-000]

Tenaska Pennsylvania Partners, LLC; Supplemental Notice That
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section
204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Tenaska Pennsylvania Partners, LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is July 25, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
[email protected]. or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 5, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14834 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 29 (Friday, February 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 7546]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02882]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0114]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office
of Management and Budget Approval; Request for Samples and Protocols

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
collection of information entitled ``Request for Samples and
Protocols'' has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd., COLE-14526, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 24, 2015, the Agency submitted
a proposed collection of information entitled ``Request for Samples and
Protocols'' to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information
collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0206. The approval
expires on December 31, 2018. A copy of the supporting statement for
this information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: February 8, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-02882 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 109 (Thursday, June 6, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26377-26379]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11778]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0358; Airspace Docket No. 19-AEA-7]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Minersville, PA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at Primrose Heliport,
Minersville, PA, to accommodate new area navigation (RNAV) global
positioning system (GPS) standard instrument approach procedures
serving this heliport. Controlled airspace is necessary for the safety
and management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at this
heliport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 22, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposed rule to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Bldg. Ground Floor Rm W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; Telephone: 1-800-
647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify the Docket No. FAA-2019-
0358; Airspace Docket No. 19-

AEA-7, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit and
review received comments through the internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
    FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed on line at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC, 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11C at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>..

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This proposed rulemaking is promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the
use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority, as it would establish Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at Primrose Heliport, Minersville, PA, to
support standard instrument approach procedures for IFR operations at
this heliport.

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to comment on this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted
in triplicate to the address listed above. You may also submit comments
through the internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Persons wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on
this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2019-0358; Airspace Docket No. 19-AEA-7.'' The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this document may be changed in light of the
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the comment
closing date. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined between 8:00 a.m. and
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays at the
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, Room 350, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and effective
September 15, 2018. FAA Order 7400.11C is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11C lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is considering an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to establish Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6-mile radius of
Primrose Heliport, Minersville, PA, providing the controlled airspace
required to support the new RNAV (GPS) standard instrument approach
procedures for IFR operations at the heliport.
    Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.11C, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15,
2018, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal would be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15, 2018, is
amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AEA PA E5 Minersville, PA [New]

Primrose Heliport, PA
    (Lat. 40[deg]41'21'' N, long. 76[deg]16'47'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6-mile radius of Primrose Heliport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 23, 2019,
Geoff Lelliott,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2019-11778 Filed 6-5-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


1 SF 83 SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE NESHAP Subpart EE, Magnetic Tape Manufacturing Operations 1. Identification of the Information Collection 1( a) Title of the Information Collection ICR for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants ( NESHAP) Subpart EE,

Magnetic Tape Manufacturing Operations 1( b) Short Characterization/ Abstract In general all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports. Owners or operators are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance; and are required, in general, of all sources subject 2 to NESHAP.

Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least 5 years following the date of such measurements,

maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated State or Local authority.

In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent directly to the EPA Regional Office.

The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants ( NESHAP) Magnetic Tape Manufacturing Operations were proposed on March 11, 1994 and promulgated on December 15, 1994 ( 59 FR 64596). These standards apply to the following magnetic tape manufacturing operations located at major sources of hazardous air pollutants ( HAP): solvent storage tank, mix preparation equipment, coating operation, waste handling device, and condenser vent in solvent recovery commencing construction or reconstruction after March 11, 1994.

Exceptions include research or laboratory facilities, and coating operation that produce a quantity of magnetic tape that is one percent or less of total production. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart EE.

Approximately thirteen ( 13) sources are currently subject to the standard, and we estimated that no additional sources will become subject to the standard in the next three years.

We assumed that three coating lines are expected to be constructed at existing sources over the next three years. This information was developed from previous estimates and checked against the Agency's IDEA database.

2. Need for and Use of the Collection 3 2( a) Need/ Authority for the Collection The EPA is charged under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants. These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction:

. . . applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air pollutants shall require the maximum degree of reduction in emissions of the hazardous air pollutants subject to this section ( Section 112( d)( 2)).

In addition, Section 114( a) states that the Administrator may require any owner or operator subject to any requirement of this Act to:

. . . ( A) establish and maintain such records; ( B) make such reports; ( C) install, use,

and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods;

( D) sample such emissions ( in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); ( E) keep records on control equipment parameters,

production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; ( F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with section 114( a)( 3);

and ( G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonably require.

In the Administrator's judgment, HAP emissions from magnetic tape manufacturing 4 operations cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, NESHAP were promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart EE.

2( b) PRACTICAL UTILITY/ USERS OF THE DATA The control of emissions of HAP from magnetic tape manufacturing operations requires not only the installation of properly designed equipment, but also the operation and maintenance of that equipment. Emissions of methyl ethyl ketone, toluene, methyl isobutyl ketone, xylene and ethyl benzene, and magnetic particles containing chromium dioxide and cobalt compounds from magnetic tape manufacturing operations are the result of operation of the facilities that are specifically associated with the manufacture of magnetic tape. These standards rely on the reduction of HAP emissions by capturing and destroying HAP by using carbon adsorbers,

incinerators or condensers, or using reduced HAP coating mix. The required notifications are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the standard.

The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properly installed and operated and the standard is being met. Performance test reports are needed as these are the Agency's record of a source's initial capability to comply with the emission standard, and serve as a record of the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved.

Each CEM shall record the inlet and outlet concentrations when determining percent efficiency if this is applied to the control device. Thermal incinerators and catalytic incinerators require thermocouples to measure the minimum combustion temperature and temperature across the catalyst bed as established as site specific operating parameters. Each thermocouple calibration 5 shall be verified or replaced every three months.

The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations. The information generated by the monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements described in this ICR is used by the Agency to ensure that facilities affected by the NESHAP continue to operate the control equipment and achieve compliance with the regulation. Adequate monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting is necessary to ensure compliance with these standards, as required by the Clean Air Act. The information collected from recordkeeping and reporting requirements is also used for targeting inspections, and is of sufficient quality to be used as evidence in court.

3. Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria The recordkeeping and reporting requested is required under 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart EE.

3( a) Nonduplication If the standard has not been delegated, the information is sent to the appropriate EPA Regional Office. Otherwise, the information is sent directly to the delegated State or Local Agency. If a State or Local Agency has adopted their own similar regulation to implement the Federal Regulation, a copy of the report submitted to the State or Local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal Standard. Therefore, no duplication exists. 6 3( b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this ICR was published in the Federal Register on April 18, 2000.

3( c) Consultations No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register.

3( d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the required standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequently, the likelihood of detecting poor operation and maintenance of control equipment and noncompliance would decrease.

3( e) General Guidelines None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violate any of the regulations established by OMB in 5 CFR 1320.6.

3( f) Confidentiality The required information consists of emissions data and other information that have been determined not to be private. However, any information submitted to the Agency for which a 7 claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 2, Subpart B  Confidentiality of Business Information ( see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251,

September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).

3( g) Sensitive Questions None of the reporting or recordkeeping requirements contain sensitive questions.

4. The Respondents and the Information Requested 4( a) Respondents/ SIC Codes The respondents of the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are owners or operators of magnetic tape manufacturing operations. The primary SIC and NAICS Codes for the respondents affected by the standards are SIC Code 3695 and NAICS Code 334613 ( Magnetic and Optical Recording Media), and SIC Code 2675 and NAICS Code 322226 ( Die cut Paper and Paperboard and Cardboard).

4( b) INFORMATION REQUESTED ( i) Data Items All data in this ICR that is recorded and/ or reported is required by 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart EE.

A source must make the following reports 8 Requirement Regulation reference General Provision reference Reports for NESHAP Subpart EE  Notification of intent to construct or reconstruct 63.707( a) 63.9( b), 63.5( b)

 Notification and report of construction date 63.707( a) 63.9( b)( 4)

 Notification of anticipated startup 63.7.7( a) 63.9( b)( 4)

 Actual startup notification 63.707( a) 63.9( b)( 4)

 Notification of applicability of the standard 63.707( a), ( b), and ( c) 63.9( b)( 2)( 3)

 Develop startup, shutdown, malfunction plan, submit reports 63.707( a) and 63.707( i) 63.6( e)( 3) and 63.10( d)( 5)

 Develop quality control plan for CMS 63.707( a) 63.8( d)

 Notification and report of performance tests and results 63.707( a) 63.7( b), 63.8( e), 63.9( e) and ( g), 63.10( d)( 2) and ( e)( 2)

 Report of when exceed HAP usage cutoff or when area source becomes major 63.707( j) 63.9( b), 63.9( h)

 Notification and report of compliance status 63.707( a) 63.9( h)( 2)( 3)

 Notification and report for waiver application 63.707( a) 63.7( h)

 Semiannual reports of no excess emissions 63.707( a) and ( i) 63.10( e)( 3)

 Quarterly reports of monitoring exceedances and excess emissions 63.707( a) and ( i) 63.10( e)( 3)

Recordkeeping for NESHAP Subpart EE  5 year retention of records 63.706( a) and ( h) 63.10( b)( 1)

 Records of monitored values, maintenance, startup, shutdown, malfunction 63.706( a) 63.10( b)( 2), 63.10( c), and 63.6( e)

 Records of the freeboard ratio 63.706( b) 63.10( b)( 2)

 Records of CMS maintenance, calibration 63.706( a) 63.8( c), 63.8( d)( 3), 63.10( b)( 2), 63.10( c)

 Records of performance tests 63.705, 63.706( a) 63.10( b)( 2) 9  Records of material balance calculation 63.706( a) and ( d) 63.10( b)( 2)

 Records of HAP usage 63.706( e) 63.10( b)( 2)

ii. Respondent Activities Respondent Activities Read instructions.

Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate CEM for VOC inlet/ outlet concentration to measure efficiency of control device, and thermocouples to measure minimum combustion temperature and temperature across catalyst bed for site specific operating parameters. Maintain records of coating mix HAP concentration and measure freeboard ratio.

Perform initial performance test, EPA Method 24 for VOC content in coatings, EPA Method 18 or EPA Method 25A to determine HAP or VOC concentrations of air exhaust streams, EPA Method 22 to determine visible emissions, and repeat performance tests if necessary.

Write the notifications and reports listed above.

Enter information required to be recorded above.

Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information.

Adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements.

Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information.

Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information.

5. The Information Collected  Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management 5( a) Agency Activities EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analysis, storage, 10 and distribution of the required information.

Agency Activities Observe initial performance tests and repeat performance tests if necessary.

Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, excess emissions reports, startup, shutdown, malfunction plan, and quality control plan for CMS required to be submitted by industry.

Audit facility records.

Input, analyze, and maintain data in the Aerometric Information Retrieval System ( AIRS) database.

5( b) Collection Methodology and Management Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority might inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are properly installed and operated. Performance test reports are used by the Agency to discern a source's initial capability to comply with the emission standard. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.

Information contained in the reports is entered into AIRS which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. AIRS is EPA's database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance and annual emission inventory data for over 100,000 industrial and government owned facilities. EPA uses AIRS for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement by Local and State regulatory agencies, and EPA Regional 11 Offices and Headquarters. EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data.

The records required by this regulation must be retained by the owner or operator for five years.

5( c) Small Entity Flexibility Three of the 13 facilities in this source category that meet the applicability criteria are small businesses. The rule will significantly impact one small business. The recordkeeping and reporting requirements were selected within the context of this specific subpart and the specific process equipment and pollutants. The impact on small businesses was accounted for in the regulation development. The requirements reflect the burden on small businesses. Even though,

the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for small and larger businesses. To the extent that larger businesses can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced. The Agency considers these requirements the minimum needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small businesses. Small facilities can minimize their recordkeeping and reporting burden by continuing to stay in compliance with the regulations. More detailed reporting is necessary for deviations from compliance.

5( d) Collection Schedule The specific frequency for each information collection activity within this request is shown in Table 2: Industry Burden. 12 6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection Table 2 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for each of the subparts included in this ICR.

The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Where appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory.

The Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

6( a) Estimating Respondent Burden The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated at 7042 person hours. These hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the standards or test methods,

Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously approved ICR, and any comments received.

6( b) Estimating Respondent Costs ( i) Estimating Labor Costs This ICR uses technical labor rates of $ 54.94 per hour. These rates are from the United States Department of Commerce Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 1999, Table 10:

Employment Costs for Private Industry by Occupational and Industry Group. The rates are from 13 column 1: Total compensation. The wage rates have been loaded by adding 110% overhead.

( ii) Estimating Capital and Operations and Maintenance Costs The type of industry costs associated with the information collection activity in the standards are labor, continuous emission monitoring, a material balance of solvent in the coating operation ( available to solvent recovery devices like carbon absorbers and condensers), or recordkeeping of coating mix HAP concentration. The capital start up costs are one time costs when a facility becomes subject to the standard. The annual operations and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor.

( iii) Capital/ Start up vs. Operating and Maintenance ( O& M) Costs Capital/ Start up vs. Operating and Maintenance ( O& M) Costs ( A)

Continuous Monitoring device ( B)

Start up cost ($) for 1 affected facility ( C)

# of new affected facilities to start up ( D)

Total start up ( B X C) ( E)

Annual O& M costs ($) for 1 affected facility ( F)

# of affected facilities with O& M ( G)

Total O& M ( E X F)

Total enclosure $ 10,000 1 $ 10,000 0 0 0 VOC CEM 0 0 0 $ 7,000 8 $ 56,000 Thermocouples 0 0 0 $ 1,800 13 $ 23,400 The total Capital/ Start up costs for this ICR are $ 10,000. This is the total of column D.

This cost is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 14 letter a: Total annualized capital/ startup 14 costs. The numbers in block 14 of the OMB 83 I form are truncated to show the cost in thousands of dollars.

The total Operating and Maintenance ( O& M) Costs for this ICR are $ 79,400. This is the total of column G. This cost is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 14 letter b: Total annual costs ( O& M). The numbers in block 14 of the OMB 83 I form are truncated to show the cost in thousands of dollars.

The total respondent costs have been calculated on the addition of the capital start up costs and the annual operations and maintenance costs. The average annual cost for capital and operations and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 89,400. This cost is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 14 letter c: Total annualized cost requested. The numbers in block 14 of the OMB 83 I form are truncated to show the cost in thousands of dollars.

6( c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost The only Federal costs are user costs associated with analysis of the reported information.

Publication and distribution of the information are part of the AIRS program. Examination of records to be maintained by the respondents will occur as part of the periodic inspection of sources, which is part of EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program.

The average annual Federal Government cost during the 3 years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 3626.00. This cost is based on an average wage of a GS 10 step 1 employee rate, $ 17.09 hr + 110% overhead = $ 35.89. This rate is from OPM's 2000 General Schedule, excluding locality pay, basic rates and travel associated with compliance activities. Details upon which this estimate 15 is based appear in Table 1: Agency Burden.

6( d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs The number of total respondents is 13. It is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 13 a..

This is the number of existing sources plus the number of sources anticipated in one year. The total annual responses is 26. It is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 13 b. The total annual labor costs are $ 386,889. This number is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 13 c. Details upon which this estimate is based appear in Table 2: Industry Burden.

The total annual capital and O& M costs to the regulated entities are $ 89,400. This number is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 14 c. These costs are detailed in section 6 b ( iii) Capital/ Start up vs. Operating and Maintenance ( O& M) Costs.

6( e) Bottom Line Burden Hours And Cost Tables See Tables 1 and 2 6( f) Reasons for Change in Burden The increase in burden from the most recently approved ICR is solely due to an increase in the labor rate estimates. The burden hours have not changed.

6( g) Burden Statement Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This 16 includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.

Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, Office of Environmental Information ( OEI), U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Mail code 2822, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, D. C. 20460; and to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW,

Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Include the EPA ICR number and OMB control number in any correspondence.

Part B of the Supporting Statement This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information. TABLE 1: AGENCY BURDEN ( A)

EPA Hours Per Occurrence ( B)

Occurrences Per Year ( C) EPA Person Hours Per Plant Per Year ( C= AxB) ( D)

Plants Per Year ( E)

EPA Person Hours Per Year ( E= CxD) ( F)

Cost a ($)

Initial performance test b 60 0 0 0 0 0 Repeat initial performance test c 1. Retesting preparation 16 0 0 0 0 0 2. Retesting 60 0 0 0 0 0 Report review Notification of intent to constr./ reconstr. d 2 1 2 1 2 72 Notification of construction date d 2 1 2 1 2 72 Notification of anticipated startup d 2 1 2 1 2 72 Notification of actual startup d 2 1 2 1 2 72 Notification of applicability existing sources e 2 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of applicability new/ reconstr. Sources d 2 1 2 1 2 72 Notification of initial performance test f 2 1 2 1 2 72 Report of initial test f 8 1 8 1 8 287 Notification of compliance status g 4 0 0 0 0 0 Startup, shutdown, malfunction plan h 4 0 0 0 0 0 Quality control plan for CMS h 4 0 0 0 0 0 Report of monitoring exceedances and i periods of noncompliance 8 1 8 4 32 1148 Report of no excess emissions i 2 2 4 12 48 1723 Report for facilities below cutoff j 1 1 1 1 1 36 Report of area source becoming a major k source or exceeding HAP usage cutoff 8 0 0 0 0 0 Waiver application l 8 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL BURDEN AND COST ( SALARY) 101 3626 a Costs are based on an hourly rate of $ 17.09 plus 110 percent of overhead which equals $ 35.89. b Assumes 10 percent of the number of tests conducted are attended by EPA. c Assumes that 20 percent fail the initial performance tests and retest. d Assumes that one new coating line will be added per year. This line will be at an existing facility. e The notification of the applicability of the standard for existing sources has already occurred. f Based on one facility conducting test, including retest. g Assumes no facilities require notification. h Assumes that EPA will review no startup, shutdown, malfunction plans and CMS quality control plans. i The number of noncompliance reports and reports of no excess emissions correspond to the respondents per year reported in Table 1 ( column D) multiplied by the number of occurrences per year reported in Table 1 ( column B). j One existing facility is expected to be below the solvent usage cutoff. k No existing area sources are expected to exceed the HAP usage cutoff or become area sources. l Assumes all waiver applications have been submitted. TABLE 2: INDUSTRY BURDEN Burden Item a ( A)

Person Hours Per Occurrence ( B)

Number of Occurrences Per Year ( C)

Person Hours Per Respondent Per Year ( C= AxB) ( D)

Respondents Per Year ( E)

Person Hours Per Year ( E= CxD) ( F)

Cost b ($)

1. Applications N/ A 2. Surveys and Studies N/ A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read instructions c 1 1 1 0 0 0 B. Required activities Tests Initial performance test APCD d 445 1 445 0 0 0 Conduct performance test method audits d 27 1 27 0 0 0 Repeat initial performance test APCD e 445 1 445 0 0 0 Repeat performance test method audits e 27 1 27 0 0 0 Initial performance test total enclosure f 215 1 215 1 215 11812 Repeat initial performance test total enclosure e 215 1 215 0 0 0 Performance test for VOC CEM's g 175 1 175 0 0 0 Quarterly VOC CEM audits g 10 4 40 8 320 17581 C. Create information Included in 3B and 4E D. Gather existing information Included in 3B and 4E E. Write report Notification of intent to constr./ reconstr. f 6 1 6 1 6 330 Notification of construction date f 2 1 2 1 2 110 Notification of anticipated start up f 2 1 2 1 2 110 Actual start up notification f 2 1 2 1 2 110 Notification of applicability of the standard existing sources c 2 1 2 0 0 0 Notification of applicability of the standard new/ reconstructed sources f 2 1 2 1 2 110 Notification of initial performance test h 2 1 2 0 0 0 Report of initial test Included in 3B Notification of compliance status i 4 1 4 0 0 0 Submit startup, shutdown, malfunction plan i 20 1 20 0 0 0 Develop and implement quality control plan for continuous monitoring systems ( CMS) i 50 1 50 0 0 0 Burden Item a ( A)

Person Hours Per Occurrence ( B)

Number of Occurrences Per Year ( C)

Person Hours Per Respondent Per Year ( C= AxB) ( D)

Respondents Per Year ( E)

Person Hours Per Year ( E= CxD) ( F)

Cost b ($)

Report when exceed HAP usage cutoff ( or report area source becoming major source) j 2 1 2 0 0 0 Waiver application c 6 1 6 0 0 0 Report of monitoring exceedances and periods of noncompliance, including inconsistencies with startup, shutdown, malfunction plan k 16 4 64 1 64 3516 Report of no excess emissions, including startup, shutdown, malfunction reports k 4 2 8 12 96 5274 4. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read instructions Included in 3A B. Plan activities N/ A C. Implement activities Included in 4D D. Develop record system i, l 40 1 40 0 0 0 E. Time to enter information Facilities above cutoff m  including records associated with startup, shutdown, malfunction, maintenance of APCD, and measurement of freeboard ratio  maintain, adjust, and calibrate CMS n and maintain records of this and any CMS malfunction that occurs 0.5 6 350 52 175 312 13 13 2275 4056 124989 222837 Facilities below cutoff o 2 1 2 1 2 110 F. Time to train personnel N/ A G. Time for audits N/ A TOTAL BURDEN AND COST NATIONWIDE: 7042 386889 Average cost per facility p 29761 a Numbers are rounded to avoid fractions. b Person hours are charged at $ 26.16/ hr plus 110 percent overhead costs which equals $ 54.94/ hr. c This cost will only be incurred during the first year. d Hours associated with the initial performance test include preparation of a site specific test plan. Hours for performance test method audits are estimated as 6 percent of the performance test hours. No facility is expected to conduct testing for the APCD and CEM's. e Assumes 20 percent of sources will have to be retested. f It is projected that, on the average, new coating lines will be added at the rate of one per year. These coating lines will be located at existing facilities which will already be meeting the reporting and recordkeeping requirements of the standard. Also, additional emission points will likely be tied into the existing APCD. Therefore, new compliance tests for the APCD and continuous monitors will not be necessary. However, a new total enclosure would be built and must be tested. g All facilities using VOC continuous emission monitors ( CEM's) will have to perform quarterly audits of monitors, estimated at 8 facilities. h No facilities are expected to conduct an initial performance test. i No facilities are expected to be required to report on status, or develop a startup, shutdown, malfunction plan, quality control plan for CMS, or record system. j No existing area sources are expected to exceed the HAP usage cutoff or become a major source. k These reports will include data based on CMS performance and/ or material balance results. It is assumed that 90 percent of the facilities in this source category will have no excess emission: reporting will therefore be semiannual. Ten percent of the facilities in this source category will have excess emissions; these facilities will need to report quarterly each year. All 13 facilities subject to the control requirements will be submitting reports. l Activities that must be implemented at all facilities include maintaining a 75 percent freeboard ration in wash sinks, the use of a closed system for flushing fixed lines, and the use of a closed system for particulate transfer. A record system will need to be developed to maintain records associated with the freeboard ratio, performance tests, notifications, and CMS QA/ QC program. m All facilities subject to the control requirements of the standard will be keeping records. n All but one of the 13 facilities subject to the rule will operate a continuous monitoring system ( CMS), as defined in section 63.2 of the proposed General Provisions. The one facility that will not operate a CMS has only one control device and will perform a materials balance to show compliance. o Facilities that fall below the HAP usage cutoff will have to submit an annual report certifying this usage. One facility is expected to be subject to this requirement. p The average facility burden is calculated by dividing the total facility burden by the number of facilities ( 13) subject to the control provisions of the standard