[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 183 (Thursday, September 20, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47581-47583]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20224]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0744; Airspace Docket No. 18-ASO-14]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace, and Amendment of
Class D Airspace and Class E Airspace; Dothan, AL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E surface airspace at
Dothan Regional Airport, Dothan, AL. The Class E surface airspace would
be established for the safety of aircraft landing and departing the
airport when the air traffic control tower is closed. Also, this action
proposes to amend Class D airspace by updating the airport's name and
geographic coordinates, as well as replacing the outdated term
`Airport/Facility Directory' with `Chart Supplement'. Additionally, the
geographic coordinates of the airport and Wiregrass VORTAC would be
adjusted in the associated Class E airspace to match the FAA's
aeronautical database; as well as removing the part-time status of the
airspace for Class E airspace designated as an extension to a Class D
surface area. Controlled airspace is necessary for the safety and
management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at this airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 5, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Bldg. Ground Floor, Rm. W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; Telephone: 1-
800-647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify the Docket No. FAA-
2018-0744; Airspace Docket No. 18-ASO-14, at the beginning of

your comments. You may also submit and review received comments through
the internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public
docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any final
disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00
p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.
    FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed on line at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11C at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This proposed rulemaking is promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the
use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority, as it would establish Class E surface airspace and amend
Class D airspace and Class E airspace at Dothan Regional Airport,
Dothan, AL, to support IFR operations at this airport.

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to comment on this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (Docket No. FAA-
2018-0744 and Airspace Docket No. 18-ASO-14) and be submitted in
triplicate to DOT Docket Operations (see ADDRESSES section for the
address and phone number.) You may also submit comments through the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Persons wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on
this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2018-0744; Airspace Docket No. 18-ASO-14.'' The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this document may be changed in light of the
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the comment
closing date. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket. All communications received on or before the specified closing
date for comments will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in
light of the comments received. A report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will
be filed in the docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined between 8:00 a.m. and
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays at the office
of the Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, Room
350, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and effective
September 15, 2018. FAA Order 7400.11C is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11C lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is considering an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by:
    Amending Class D airspace at Dothan Regional Airport, Dothan, AL by
recognizing the airport name change to Dothan Regional Airport
(formerly Dothan Airport), and adjusting the geographic coordinates of
the airport to be in concert with the FAA's aeronautical database.
Also, this action would make an editorial change replacing the term
``Airport/Facility Directory'' with the term ``Chart Supplement'' in
the airspace legal description;
    Establishing Class E surface area airspace within a 4.7-mile radius
of Dothan Regional Airport, Dothan, AL, for the safety of aircraft
landing and departing the airport after the air traffic control tower
closes;
    Amending Class E airspace designated as an extension to a Class D
surface area by adjusting the geographic coordinates of the airport and
the Wiregrass VORTAC to be in concert with the FAA's aeronautical
database.
    In addition, the part-time status would be removed from this
airspace description, as the airspace is continuously active; and
    Amending Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface at Dothan Regional Airport, Dothan, AL, by adjusting the
geographic coordinates of the airport and the Wiregrass VORTAC to be in
concert with the FAA's aeronautical database, and by recognizing the
airport name change to Dothan Regional Airport (formerly Dothan
Airport).

    Class D and Class E airspace designations are published in
Paragraphs 5000, 6002, 6004, and 6005, respectively of FAA Order
7400.11C, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15, 2018,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and
Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal would be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15, 2018, is
amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ASO AL D Dothan, AL [Amended]

Dothan Regional Airport, AL
    (Lat. 31[deg]19'16'' N, long. 85[deg]26'58'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,900 feet MSL within a 4.7-mile radius of Dothan Regional Airport.
This Class D airspace area is effective during the specific dates
and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The
effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in
the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

ASO AL E2 Dothan, AL [New]

Dothan Regional Airport, AL
    (Lat. 31[deg]19'16'' N, long. 85[deg]26'58'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 4.7-
mile radius of Dothan Regional Airport. This Class E surface
airspace area is effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective date and
time will thereafter be continuously published in the Chart
Supplement.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Designated as an Extension to a
Class D Surface Area.

* * * * *

ASO AL E4 Dothan, AL [Amended]

Dothan Regional Airport, AL
    (Lat. 31[deg]19'16'' N, long. 85[deg]26'58'' W)
Wiregrass VORTAC
    (Lat. 31[deg]17'05'' N, long. 85[deg]25'52'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 3.2 miles
each side of the Wiregrass VORTAC 156[deg] radial, extending from
the 4.7-mile radius of Dothan Regional Airport to 7-miles southeast
of the VORTAC.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO AL E5 Dothan, AL [Amended]

Dothan Regional Airport, AL
    (Lat. 31[deg]19'16'' N, long. 85[deg]26'58'' W)
Wiregrass VORTAC
    (Lat. 31[deg]17'05'' N, long. 85[deg]25'52'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.7-mile radius of Dothan Regional Airport within 3.2 miles
each side of Wiregrass VORTAC 156[deg] radial, extending from the
6.7-mile radius to 7 miles SE of the VORTAC excluding that airspace
within the Fort Rucker, AL, Class E airspace area.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on September 10, 2018.
Christopher Cox,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2018-20224 Filed 9-19-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 24, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 80)]
[Notices]
[Page 22148-22149]
[DOCID:fr24ap08-41]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-370-002]

Missouri River Energy Services; Notice of Filing

April 18, 2008.
    Take notice that on April 14, 2008, Missouri River Energy Services
(MRES), submitted for filing additional information regarding revisions
to the Midwest ISO open access transmission tariff that would establish
an Attachment O transmission rate formula to its December 20, 2007
filing. MRES and Western Minnesota Municipal Power Agency (Western
Minnesota) are also requesting for a declaratory order permitting MRES
and Western Minnesota to combine their financial information for
Attachment O.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and

interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 5, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-9016 Filed 4-23-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 12 (Friday, January 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 3261]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01034]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, January
22, 2014 at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:
    The Commission will consider whether to approve the 2014 budget of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and will consider the
related annual accounting support fee for the Board under Section 109
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the
Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: January 15, 2014.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-01034 Filed 1-15-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: August 25, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 163)]
[Notices]
[Page 42885-42887]
[DOCID:fr25au09-59]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2157-188]

Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County; Notice of
Application Accepted for Filing, Soliciting Motions To Intervene and
Protests, Ready for Environmental Analysis, and Soliciting Comments,
Recommendations, Preliminary Terms and Conditions, and Preliminary
Fishway Prescriptions

August 18, 2009.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: New Major License.
    b. Project No.: P-2157-188.
    c. Date Filed: June 1, 2009.
    d. Applicant: Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County.
    e. Name of Project: Henry M Jackson Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The existing project is located on the Sultan River in
Snohomish County, Washington, about 20 miles east of Everett,
Washington. The project penstock underlies 10.9 acres of Mount Baker-
Snoqualmie National Forest.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791 (a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish
County (District), Steven J. Klein, General Manager, 2320 California
Street, P.O. Box 1107, Everett, WA 98206-1107.
    i. FERC Contact: David Turner<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. The deadline for filing motions to intervene and protests,
comments, recommendations, preliminary terms and conditions, and
preliminary fishway prescriptions is October 19, 2009; reply comments
are due December 1, 2009.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents

with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each person on
the official service list for the project. Further, if an intervenor
files comments or documents with the Commission relating to the merits
of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a particular
resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document on that
resource agency.
    Motions to intervene, protests, comments, recommendations,
preliminary terms and conditions, and preliminary fishway prescriptions
may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. The
Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
(http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.
    k. This application has been accepted for filing and is ready for
environmental analysis.
    l. The existing project consists of the following: (1) Spada Lake,
with a surface area of 1,802 acres at a normal water surface elevation
of 1,445 feet msl; (2) Culmback dam, a 640-foot-long, 262-foot-high
earth and rockfill dam with a crest elevation of 1,470 feet msl located
at River Mile (RM) 16.5 on the Sultan River; (3) a concrete morning
glory spillway with a crest elevation of 1,450 feet msl located
approximately 250 feet from the right bank; (4) a system of conduits
and valves under the dam which provide the minimum flow downstream of
Culmback dam; (5) a 110-foot-tall concrete intake structure located
approximately 250 feet upstream of the dam with three 20-foot movable
panels to allow withdrawal from different depths; (6) a penstock
consisting of a 3.8-mile-long, 14-foot-diameter unlined tunnel leading
to a 3.7-mile-long, 10-foot-diameter underground pipeline; (7) a two-
story reinforced-concrete powerhouse located at RM 4.3; (8) four
generating units with a total installed capacity of 111.8 MW; Units 1
and 2 are 47.5 MW Pelton turbines which discharge water directly into a
40-foot-long discharge canal to the Sultan River; Units 3 and 4 are 8.4
MW Francis turbines which discharge water through the Lake Chaplain
water supply pipeline; (9) the approximately 3.5-mile-long, 72-inch-
diameter Lake Chaplain water supply pipeline, which routes water from
the Francis turbines to the Portal 2 structure at Lake Chaplain; (10)
the Portal 2 structure, which diverts flows from the Lake Chaplain
pipeline to Lake Chaplain (a 450-acre reservoir which serves as the
City of Everett's water supply) or to the diversion dam tunnel and
pipeline; (11) a 1.5-mile-long, concrete-lined tunnel and a 2,000-foot-
long, 72-inch-diameter concrete pipeline connecting Lake Chaplain and
the Sultan River immediately upstream of the diversion dam; (12) a 120-
foot-long, 20-foot-high, concrete gravity diversion dam which was
originally constructed to divert water from the Sultan River to Lake
Chaplain; and (13) other appurtenant equipment. Project operations are
guided by reservoir rule curves which are designed to minimize spill at
Spada Lake while providing minimum flow releases to the Sultan River
downstream of the diversion dam. The District proposes the following
changes to the project: (1) Modifications to the project boundary that
include additions to and exclusions to the existing project boundary;
(2) a new Operations Plan based on revised Spada Lake rule curves; (3)
several aquatic habitat enhancement measures; (4) measures to protect
and enhance wildlife habitat; (5) measures to enhance recreational
opportunities; and (6) measures to protect historic properties.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-
866-208-3676, or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is also available for
inspection and reproduction at the address in item h above.
    Register online at http://www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm to be
notified via e-mail of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.
    n. Anyone may submit comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene
in accordance with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure,
18 CFR 385.210, .211, .214. In determining the appropriate action to
take, the Commission will consider all protests or other comments
filed, but only those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with
the Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any
comments, protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or
before the specified comment date for the particular application.
    All filings must (1) Bear in all capital letters the title
``PROTEST'', ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', ``COMMENTS,'' ``REPLY COMMENTS,''
``RECOMMENDATIONS,'' ``PRELIMINARY TERMS AND CONDITIONS,'' or
``PRELIMINARY FISHWAY PRESCRIPTIONS;'' (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise
comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, recommendations, terms and conditions or prescriptions must
set forth their evidentiary basis and otherwise comply with the
requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may obtain copies of the
application directly from the applicant. A copy of any protest or
motion to intervene must be served upon each representative of the
applicant specified in the particular application. A copy of all other
filings in reference to this application must be accompanied by proof
of service on all persons listed in the service list prepared by the
Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and
385.2010.
    o. Procedural Schedule: The application will be processed according
to the following Hydro Licensing Schedule. Revisions to the schedule
may be made as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Filing of Interventions,               October 19, 2009.
 Recommendations, Preliminary Terms
 and Conditions, and Fishway
 Prescriptions.
Reply Comments due...................  December 1, 2009.
Issue Draft EA.......................  April 13, 2010.
Comments on Draft EA Due.............  May 13, 2010.
Filing of Modified Mandatory Terms     July 12, 2010.
 and Conditions.
Issue Final EA.......................  October 11, 2010.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    p. Final amendments to the application must be filed with the
Commission no later than 30 days from the issuance date of this notice.
    q. A license applicant must file no later than 60 days following
the date of issuance of the notice of acceptance and ready for
environmental analysis provided for in 5.22: (1) A copy of the water
quality certification; (2) a copy of the request for certification,
including proof of the date on which the certifying agency received the
request; or (3) evidence of waiver of water quality certification.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-20367 Filed 8-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 01/09/2008 02:49 PM

To

Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

RE: O3 implementation rule materials

Ron and Janet,

I'm trying to work out where we might piece together a map of how to

reconcile the Ozone Implementation Cost/Bene estimates in concert with

the Ozone NAAQS RIA estimates.

It was not clear to me that the documents attached below would get me

where I need to go - I thought you mentioned an RIA completed 2 or 3

years ago that showed estimates of bene's and costs through attainment

of .084 ppm?  I could not find that document on ttn.

Could you or someone in your group point me in the right direction?

Thanks,

heidi

-----Original Message-----

From<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 2:20 PM

To: King, Heidi R.; Johansson, Robert

Cc<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> <EMAIL_ADDRESS> Subject: O3 implementation rule materials

O3 implementation OMB-OIRA principals---Art Fraas & Amy Flynne (not

there anymore)

Documents--see below.  don't worry about the 2003 reference in the pdf

and word files..that's the docket number

(See attached file: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0079-0994.wpd)(See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0079-0995.pdf)(See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0079-0996.wpd)


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

Issued by the Department of Transportation on March April XX7, 2006

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2004-17201

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Application of US AIRWAYS, INC., filed 1/13/06, for:

XX	Renewal of exemption for two years under 49 U.S.C. 40109 to provide
the following service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail (1)
from a point or points in the United States, via intermediate points, to
a point or points in Turkey and beyond; (2) from a point or points in
the United States, via intermediate points, to a point or points in
Portugal and beyond; and, to integrate this authority with its existing
certificate and exemption authority.

Applicant rep:	Howard Kass<PHONE_NUMBER>	DOT Analyst: Tretha Chromey
(202) 366-2367

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX	Granted, in part (subject to conditions, see below)

XX	Dismissed, in part (request for route integration authority)

The above action was effective when taken: March April XX7, 2006 through
March April XX7, 2008.

Action taken by:	Paul L. Gretch, Director

Office of International Aviation

XX	 The authority granted is consistent with the aviation agreements
between the United States and Turkey, and the United States and
Portugal.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:	XX	 Holder’s
certificates of public convenience and necessity

XX	 Standard exemption conditions (attached)

XX	Statement of Authorization approving US Airways/Lufthansa code-share
operations and conditions therein (see Docket OST-2003-15946)

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department’s regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted, we denied all requests in the referenced
Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority granted in this
Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

http://dms.dot.gov//reports/report_aviation.asp

U.S. Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the U.S. carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, including, but not limited to, 49 CFR Part 1544.
To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, the holder shall, before commencing any new service
(including charter flights) to or from a foreign airport, contact its
International Principal Security Inspector (IPSI) to advise the IPSI of
its plans and to find out whether the Transportation Security
Administration has determined that security is adequate to allow such
airport(s) to be served; and

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

05/2004

 US Airways states in its application that it intends to continue to
operate this service pursuant to a code-share arrangement with Lufthansa
as well as operate its own flights.  In addition, it may offer
code-share services with other partners.  See Docket OST-2003-15946.

 The carrier’s request for route integration authority has been
superseded by Order 2006-1-1, where the Department awarded the carrier a
blanket route integration certificate.


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 23 (Friday, February 5, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 8355]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02422]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL21-25-000]

Richmond Spider Solar, LLC;

    Notice of Institution of Section 206 Proceeding and Refund
Effective Date
    On January 29, 2021, the Commission issued an order in Docket No.
EL21-25-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16
U.S.C. 824e, instituting an investigation into whether Richmond Spider
Solar, LLC's proposed rate schedule is unjust, unreasonable, unduly
discriminatory, or preferential, or otherwise unlawful. Richmond Spider
Solar, LLC, 174 FERC ] 61,065 (2021).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL21-25-000, established
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication
of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL21-25-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, in
accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214 (2020), within 21 days of the date of
issuance of the order.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the
    Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,
(202) 502-8659.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFile'' link at
http://www.ferc.gov. In lieu of electronic filing, you may submit a
paper copy. Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service must be
addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.
Submissions sent via any other carrier must be addressed to: Kimberly
D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins
Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

    Dated: January 29, 2021.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-02422 Filed 2-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


MEMORANDUM

Date:	November 3, 2011

Subject:	Estimated Cost Impact for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing Industry to Comply with Proposed Residual Risk and Technology Review (RTR) Amendments

Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing RTR

RTI Project No. 0213199.010

From:	Dave Reeves, RTI International

To:	Susan Fairchild

OAQPS/SPPD/NRG (D243-02)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

The purpose of this memorandum is to present the estimated costs for the wool fiberglass manufacturing industry to comply with the proposed RTR amendments.

BACKGROUND

Based on the information provided by the wool fiberglass manufacturing industry and their primary trade association, North American Insulation Manufacturers Association (NAIMA), there are currently 29 facilities in the U.S. producing wool fiberglass. A recent letter from NAIMA dated June 8, 2011, stated “non-formaldehyde binder products represent the vast majority of the industry” and “all major sources have already converted or have announced plans to convert to non-phenol formaldehyde binders.” Based on that information, we estimate that only 2 wool fiberglass manufacturing facilities will be subject to the NESHAP (subpart NNN) requirements on the compliance date of the proposed amendments (e.g., 2013).

We estimate that there are 2 major source facilities with bonded lines producing heavy density products and/or pipe insulation that will incur additional testing costs to demonstrate compliance with the new (proposed) phenol and methanol emission limits for forming and curing operations. Those 2 major source facilities would incur additional testing costs to demonstrate compliance with the new (proposed) chromium (Cr) compounds, hydrogen fluoride (HF) and hydrogen chloride (HCl) emission limits for their melting furnaces.  Table 1 summarizes the above information and associated cost impacts.

Additionally, based on emissions test data received, there are three furnaces (located at three different facilities) that do not currently meet the chrome limit that is being proposed. If for some reason these facilities do not become area sources by the compliance date of the proposed rule, we are estimating that two of the furnaces will have to add additional controls (caustic scrubber) and one, due to exceptionally high chrome emissions, will have to replace the refractory brick lining of the furnace. The cost estimates for this scenario are located in Table 2. Table 1. Summary of Costs for Wool Fiberglass Mfg Facilities to Comply with Proposed RTR Amendments

	Pipe or Heavy Density Product Lines	Melting Furnaces	Forming/Curing Operations

on FA Lines for Pipe Insulation or Heavy Density Products	Total Facility Cost

	Cr Control Eqmt Annualized Cost	# Furnaces

	Testing Costa

Facility	Location

	# FA Lines	Test Cost

1	CertainTeed	Athens, GA	 	0	2	0	0	0	0

	2	CertainTeed	Chowchilla, CA	 	0	1	0	0	0	0

	3	CertainTeed	Kansas City, KS	 	0	2	0	0	0	0

	4	FiberTEK	Lakeland, FL	 	0 	2	 0	0	0	0

	5	Guardian	Albion, MI	 	0	4	0	0	0	0

	6	Guardian	Inwood, WV	 	0	2	0	0	0	0

	7	Guardian	Kingman, AZ	 	0	1	0	0	0	0

	8	Guardian	Mineral Wells, MS	 	0	2	0	0	0	0

	9	Guardian	Winnsboro, SC	 	0	1	0	0	0	0

	10	Johns Manville	Cleburne, TX	 	0	3	0	0	0	0

	11	Johns Manville	Defiance, OH	Yes	0	8	40,000	2	26,000	66,000

	12	Johns Manville	McPherson, KS	 	0	3	0	0	0	0

	13	Johns Manville	Penbryn, NJ	 	0	1	0	0	0	0

	14	Johns Manville	Richmond, IN	 	0	2	0	0	0	0

	15	Johns Manville	Waterville, OH	 	0	6	0	0	0	0

	16	Johns Manville	Willows, CA	 	0	6	0	0	0	0

	17	Johns Manville	Winder, GA	 	0	5	0	0	0	0

	18	Knauf	Lanett, AL	 	0	2	0	0	0	0

	19	Knauf	Shasta Lake, CA	 	0	1	0	0	0	0

	20	Knauf	Shelbyville, IN	 	0	2	0	0	0	0

	21	Owens-Corning	Delmar, NY	 	0	2	0	0	0	0

	22	Owens-Corning	Eloy, AZ	 	0	2	0	0	0	0

	23	Owens-Corning	Fairburn, GA	 	0	3	0	0	0	0

	24	Owens-Corning	Kansas City, KS	 	0	3	0	0	0	0

	25	Owens-Corning	Mount Vernon, OH	 	0	3	0	0	0	0

	26	Owens-Corning	Newark, OH	Yes	0	4	20,000	2	26,000	46,000

	27	Owens-Corning	Salt Lake City, UT	 	0	2	0	0	0	0

	28	Owens-Corning	Santa Clara, CA	 	0	2	0	0	0	0

	29	Owens-Corning	Waxahachie, TX	 	0	3	0	0	0	0

SubTotal  	$0	80	$60,000	4	$52,000	$112,000

Table 1 notes:

Furnace testing costs reflect incremental costs for Cr, HF, and HCl testing; current test requirements for PM not included.

Table 2. Summary of Control Costs for Glass-Melting Furnaces that Do Not Currently Meet the Proposed Chromium Limit

Control Option

Estimated Capital Cost* ($MM)

Estimated Annual Cost ($MM)	Total HAP Emissions Reductions (pounds per year)

Cost Effectiveness in $ per pound

No. Facilities

Change out of refractory brick lining	6.0	0.3	900	333	1

Installation of NaOH scrubber	0.25	0.1	70	1,400	2

* These costs are presented as example costs only and were not used in calculating the cost impacts associated with the proposed amendments.  If the facilities with the 3 existing furnaces currently not meeting the proposed chrome emission limit (based on the most recent test results) do not become area sources and are subject to the NESHAP amendments, these are estimates of the control costs and cost effectiveness for those furnaces.

COMPLIANCE TESTING COSTS

Mr. Steffan Johnson of EPA’s Measurement Policy Group provided the following cost estimates for compliance testing based on the test methods being proposed in the RTR amendments:

Emission Source	HAP	Test

Method	Test Cost (in 2010 $)	Comment

Melting Furnaces	Cr compounds	29	$7,000

HF and HCl	320 	$5,000

	Forming and  Curing  (combined)	Phenol and Methanol (already testing for formaldehyde)

318

$14,000

$12,000 for each additional test

  PAGE  3

  PAGE   \* MERGEFORMAT  2