[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 18, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18221-18223]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07834]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0189]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation; Lake Ferguson; Greenville, MS

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary special local
regulation controlling movement of vessels for certain waters of Lake
Ferguson, Greenville, MS. This rule is necessary to provide for the
safety of life on navigable waters during a paddling event on April 22,
2017. This regulation prohibits entry by all vessels, mariners, and
persons into the event area, an approximate 300-yard stretch of Lake
Ferguson extending approximately 150-yards west from the Greenville
boat launch. All vessels transiting Lake Ferguson west-northwest of the
regulated area will be limited to slowest speed for safe navigation to
minimize wake unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port
Memphis or an on-scene representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m. until 4 p.m. on April 22,
2017.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2017-0189 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Todd Manow, Waterways Management, Sector
Lower Mississippi River, U.S. Coast Guard, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior

notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency, for good cause, finds that
those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) with respect to this rule because doing so would be
impracticable. The Greater Greenville Development Foundation did not
notify the Coast Guard that it will be sponsoring the ``Delta Dragon
Boat Race'' on April 22, 2017 with sufficient time remaining to publish
an NPRM. It is impracticable to publish an NPRM because we must
establish this safety zone by April 22, 2017.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for making this temporary rule
effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
For the same reasons discussed in the preceding paragraph, waiting for
a 30 day notice period to run would be impracticable.

III. Legal Authority and Need for a Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1233. The COTP has determined that potential hazards posed to
participants of a rowing regatta in Lake Ferguson would be a safety
concern for anyone transiting this waterway in the vicinity of the
Greenville boat launch in Greenville, Mississippi. The purpose of this
rulemaking is to ensure the safety of event participants and other
waterway users before, during, and after the scheduled event in the
navigable waters of Lake Ferguson.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a special local regulation, enforced from 8
a.m. until 4 p.m. on April 22, 2017. In light of the aforementioned
hazards, the COTP has determined that a special local regulation is
necessary to protect spectators, vessels, and participants. The special
local regulation will encompass the following in Lake Ferguson in the
vicinity of Greenville, MS: starting from a point on shore at
33[deg]24.83' N., 091[deg]03.95' W., proceeding 150 yards west-
northwest into the lake at 33[deg]24.88' N., 091[deg]04.02' W., then
proceeding approximately 390 yards south-southwest to 33[deg]24.71' N.,
091[deg]04.15' W., then proceeding 160 yards east-southeast to a point
on shore at 33[deg]24.67' N., 091[deg]04.07' W., before returning
north-northeast along the shoreline to the point of origin.
    This regulation prohibits entry by all vessels, mariners, and
persons into the event area, an approximate 300-yard stretch of Lake
Ferguson extending approximately 150-yards west-northwest from the
Greenville boat launch. All vessels transiting Lake Ferguson through
the spectator zone, west-northwest of the regulated area to the state
line, will be limited to slowest speed for safe navigation to minimize
wake unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Memphis
or an on-scene representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review'') and 13563
(``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'') direct agencies to
assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits including potential economic, environmental,
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity.
E.O.13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs''), directs agencies to reduce regulation
and control regulatory costs and provides that ``for every one new
regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for
elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be prudently
managed and controlled through a budgeting process.''
    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not designated this
rule a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
not reviewed it.
    As this rule is not a significant regulatory action, this rule is
exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See OMB's
Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the
Executive Order of January 30, 2017 titled `Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
    The Coast Guard's use of this special local regulation will be only
eight hours in duration on a Saturday in April, and it is designed to
minimize the impact on navigation. Moreover, vessels will be allowed to
transit Lake Ferguson west-northwest of the event area at the slowest
speed for safe navigation to minimize wake. Overall, the Coast Guard
expects minimal impact to vessel movement from the enforcement of this
special local regulation.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in this portion of Lake Ferguson in the vicinity of
Greenville, MS between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. on April 22, 2017.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule will affect your small
business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and

preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because
it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has
implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary
determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a special local
regulation lasting eight hours on a Saturday in April. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
34(h) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental
analysis checklist and Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1233.

0
2. Add Sec.  100.35T08-0189 to read as follows:

Sec.  100.35 T08-0189  Special Local Regulation; Lake Ferguson,
Greenville, MS.

    (a) Regulated area. (1) A regulated area is established to
encompass all waters of Lake Ferguson, in the vicinity of the
Greenville Boat Launch, within an area starting from a point on shore
at 33[deg]24.83' N., 091[deg]03.95' W., proceeding approximately 150
yards WNW into the lake at 33[deg]24.88' N., 091[deg]04.02' W., then
proceeding approximately 390 yards SSW to 33[deg]24.71' N.,
091[deg]04.15' W., then proceeding 160 yards ESE to a point on shore at
33[deg]24.67' N., 091[deg]04.07' W., before returning NNE along the
shoreline to the point of origin.
    (2) A spectator zone will be established in Lake Ferguson, west-
northwest of the regulated area to the state line.
    (b) Effective period. This section is effective and will be
enforced from 8 a.m. until 4 p.m. on April 22, 2017.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  100.801 of this part, all vessels, mariners, and persons are
prohibited from entering the event area, without permission of the
Captain of the Port Memphis (COTP) or an on-scene representative. All
vessel operators desiring to operate in the event area of this special
local regulation must contact the COTP or an on-scene representative to
request permission to do so. The COTP or may be contacted via VHF
Channel 16 or by telephone at 1-866-777-2784. An on-scene
representative may be a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the
United States Coast Guard or a federal, state or local law enforcement
officer.
    (2) During enforcement, all Vessels transiting Lake Ferguson
through the spectator zone will be limited to slowest speed for safe
navigation to minimize wake unless specifically authorized by the COTP
or an on-scene representative.
    (d) Informational broadcasts. The COTP will inform the public
through broadcast notices to mariners of the enforcement period for the
regulated area as well as any changes in the dates and times of
enforcement.

    Dated: March 31, 2017.
T.J. Wendt,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Memphis, Tennessee.
[FR Doc. 2017-07834 Filed 4-17-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: October 13, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 196)]
[Notices]
[Page 52481-52482]
[DOCID:fr13oc09-59]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL05-146-009]

Notice of Compliance Filing; Independent Energy Producers
Association v. California Independent System Operator Corporation

October 5, 2009.
    Take notice that on October 2, 2009, RRI Energy Services, Inc., on
behalf of itself, RRI Energy Coolwater, Inc., RRI Energy Ellwood, Inc.,
RRI Energy Etiwanda, Inc., RRI Energy Mandalay, Inc., and RRI Energy
Ormond Beach, Inc. filed a compliance refund report pursuant to the
Commission's order issued on August 18, 2009, 128 FERC ] 61,165 (2009)
(Order on Remand).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on October 23, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-24492 Filed 10-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 227 (Monday, November 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70306-70307]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28084]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-D-0305]

Distribution of In Vitro Diagnostic Products Labeled for Research
Use Only or Investigational Use Only: Guidance for Industry and Food
and Drug Administration Staff; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of the guidance entitled ``Distribution of In Vitro
Diagnostic Products Labeled for Research Use Only or Investigational
Use Only.'' This guidance document is intended for manufacturers and
distributors of ``for research use only'' (RUO) and ``for
investigational use only'' (IUO) in vitro diagnostic (IVD) products and
any other entities who label IVD products, as well as FDA staff.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on this guidance at
any time. General comments on Agency guidance documents are welcome at
any time.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the guidance
document entitled ``Distribution of In Vitro Diagnostic Products
Labeled for Research Use Only or Investigational Use Only'' to the
Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance,
Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4613, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002; or the Office of Communication, Outreach and
Development (HFM-40), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
(CBER), Food and Drug Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, Suite 200N,
Rockville, MD 20852-1448. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist that office in processing your request, or fax your request to
301-847-8149. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for information
on electronic access to the guidance.
    Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit
written comments concerning this guidance to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Mansfield, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5676, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
301-796-4664.
    For questions relating to devices regulated by CBER, contact:
Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (HFM-17),
Food and Drug Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, Suite 200N,
Rockville, MD 20852-1448,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    This guidance document is intended for manufacturers, and any other
entities legally responsible for the labeling of IVD products that are
distributing such products they have labeled RUO or IUO (subsequently
referred to collectively as ``manufacturers''). This guidance is
intended to provide the current thinking of CDRH and CBER on when IVD
products are properly labeled RUO and IUO.
    This guidance is being issued because FDA is concerned that the
distribution of unapproved and uncleared IVD products labeled RUO or
IUO, but intended for purposes other than research or investigation
(for example, for clinical diagnostic use \1\), has led, in some cases,
to the diagnostic use of products with unproven performance
characteristics, and with manufacturing controls that are inadequate to
ensure consistent manufacturing of the finished product. Use of such
tests for clinical diagnostic purposes may mislead healthcare providers
and cause serious adverse health consequences to patients who are not
aware that they are being diagnosed with or treated based on the
results of tests with research or investigational products. This
guidance is thus intended to remind manufacturers that RUO and IUO
labeling must be consistent with the manufacturer's intended use of the
device.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Throughout this guidance document, references to ``clinical
diagnostic use'' and ``use in clinical diagnosis'' include use in
making medical treatment decisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the Federal Register of June 1, 2011 (76 FR 31615), FDA
announced the availability of the draft guidance document under the
title ``Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration
Staff: Commercially Distributed In Vitro Diagnostic Products Labeled
for Research Use Only or Investigational Use Only: Frequently Asked
Questions.'' Interested persons were invited to comment by August 30,
2011. The FDA received 55 sets of comments regarding the guidance. As a
result of these comments, FDA revised the guidance and changed its
format. Due to these revisions, FDA also changed the name of the
guidance document.

II. Significance of Guidance

    This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
Agency's current thinking on ``Distribution of In Vitro Diagnostic
Products Labeled for Research Use Only or Investigational Use Only.''
It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does
not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be
used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statute and regulations.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons interested in obtaining a copy of the guidance may do so by
using the Internet. A search capability for all CDRH guidance documents
is available at http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm. Guidance
documents are also available at http://www.regulations.gov or from CBER
at http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/default.htm. To receive
``Distribution of In Vitro Diagnostic Products Labeled for Research Use
Only or Investigational Use Only'' you may either send an email request
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>to receive an electronic copy of the document or
send a fax request to<PHONE_NUMBER> to receive a hard copy. Please use
the document number 1723 to identify the guidance you are requesting.

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collections of information in 21 CFR part 809.10 and part 812 have been
approved under OMB control numbers 0910-0485 and 0910-0078,
respectively.

V. Comments

    Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to http://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It

is only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify comments with
the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to
the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: November 19, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-28084 Filed 11-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19678-19680]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7788]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2012-0220]

Cooperative Research and Development Agreement: Asset Tracking
and Reporting Technology

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of intent; request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is announcing its intent to enter into a
Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with General
Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc. (General Dynamics), to test, evaluate, and
document the strengths and weaknesses of at least one technical
approach for exchanging asset position, status, and brief collaborative
messages between the Coast Guard Incident Command Staff (ICS), deployed
Coast Guard and non-Coast Guard personnel, and other mobile assets
which are engaged within an ICS managed, Incident of National
Significance Response. While the Coast Guard is currently considering
partnering with General Dynamics, we are soliciting public comment on
the nature of and participation of other parties in the proposed CRADA.
In addition, the Coast Guard also invites other potential participants
to submit proposals for consideration in similar CRADAs.

DATES: Comments and related material on the proposed CRADA must either
be submitted to our online docket via http://www.regulations.gov on or
before May 2, 2012, or reach the Docket Management Facility by that
date. Notifications from parties interested in participating as a non-
Federal participant in a CRADA similar to the one described in this
notice must reach the Docket Management Facility on or before May 2,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit written comments on this notice identified by
docket number USCG-2012-0220 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
    Do not submit detailed proposals for different CRADAs to the Docket
Management Facility. Instead, if you are interested in being a non-
Federal participant in a different CRADA, you may submit detailed
proposals to Ms. Monica Cisternelli, U.S. Coast Guard Research and
Development Center, 1 Chelsea Street, New London, CT 06320 email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions concerning this
notice or desire to submit a CRADA proposal, please contact Ms. Monica
Cisternelli, U.S. Coast Guard Research and Development Center, 1
Chelsea Street, New London, CT 06320, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Ms. Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments and related material on this
notice. All comments received will be posted, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have
provided.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
notice (USCG-2012-0220) and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online via
http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online via
http://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the Coast
Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax, hand
deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as having been
received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov and
type ``USCG-2012-0220'' in the ``Keyword'' box. If you submit your
comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard
or envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period.

Viewing Comments and Related Material

    To view the comments and related material, go to http://www.regulations.gov, click on the ``read comments'' box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box, insert ``USCG-
2012-0220'' and click ``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in
the ``Actions'' column. If you do not have access to the Internet, you
may view the docket online by visiting the Docket Management Facility
in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to
use the Docket Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act, system of
records notice regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008,
issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Cooperative Research and Development Agreements

    Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs), are
authorized by the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-
502, codified at 15 U.S.C. 3710(a)). A CRADA promotes the transfer of
technology to the private sector for commercial use as well as
specified research or development efforts that are consistent with the
mission of the Federal parties to the CRADA. The Federal party or
parties agree with one or more non-Federal parties to share research
resources, but the Federal party does not contribute funding. The
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), as an executive agency under 5
U.S.C. 105, is a Federal agency for purposes of 15 U.S.C. 3710(a) and
may enter into a CRADA. DHS delegated its authority to the Commandant
of the Coast Guard (see DHS Delegation No. 0160.1, para. 2.B(34)), and
the Commandant has delegated his authority to the Coast Guard's
Research and Development Center (R&DC).
    CRADAs are not procurement contracts. Care is taken to ensure that
CRADAs are not used to circumvent the contracting process. CRADAs have
a specific purpose and should not be confused with other types of
agreements such as procurement contracts, grants, and cooperative
agreements.

Goal of Proposed CRADA

    Under the proposed CRADA, the Coast Guard's R&DC would collaborate
with non-Federal participants. Together, the R&DC and the non-Federal
participants would test, evaluate, and document the strengths and
weaknesses of at least one technical approach for exchanging asset
position, status, and brief collaborative messages between the Coast
Guard Incident Command Staff (ICS), deployed Coast Guard and non-Coast
Guard personnel, and other mobile assets, which are engaged within an
ICS-managed, Incident of National Significance (IONS) Response. The
CRADA partners will determine the viability of technical approaches for
asset tracking and non-verbal communications exchange by conducting a
live test in conjunction with a Coast Guard response exercise. The
response exercise will utilize emergency personnel, such as Oil Spill
Response Organizations (OSROs) and non-Federal CRADA partner-provided
handheld devices and interoperable communications technology.

Party Contributions

    We anticipate that the Coast Guard's contributions under the
proposed CRADA will include the following:
    (1) Provide CRADA partners with access to, and appropriate use of
Coast Guard assets, facilities and personnel engaged in a Coast Guard
response exercise;
    (2) Provide CRADA partners with all necessary approvals and access
for their installation of the asset tracking and non-verbal
communications exchange technology on at least one Coast Guard vessel
or shore facility; and
    (3) Develop the Technology Demonstration Concept Document,
Technology Test Objectives, Test Plan, and Project Report for the CRADA
work.
    We anticipate that the non-Federal participants' contributions
under the proposed CRADA will include the following:

    (1) Provide appropriate input to the R&DC for the development of
the Technology Demonstration Concept Document, Technology Test
Objectives, Test Plan, and Project Report;
    (2) Provide, install, operate, maintain, and remove all material
(including hardware, software, and test equipment), along with the
associated labor, needed for the Technology Demonstration as set forth
within the Test Plan; and
    (3) Provide the R&DC with a Test Report documenting the results of
the Technology Demonstration.

Selection Criteria

    The Coast Guard reserves the right to select for CRADA participants
all, some, or none of the proposals received in response to this
notice. The Coast Guard will provide no funding for reimbursement of
proposal development costs. Proposals (or any other material) submitted
in response to this notice will not be returned. Proposals submitted
are expected to be unclassified and have no more than four single-sided
pages (excluding cover page and resumes). The Coast Guard will select
proposals at its sole discretion on the basis of:
    (1) How well they communicate an understanding of, and ability to
meet, the proposed CRADA's goal; and
    (2) How well they address the following criteria:
    (a) Technical capability to support the non-Federal party
contributions described; and
    (b) Resources available for supporting the non-Federal party
contributions described.
    Currently, the Coast Guard is considering General Dynamics for
participation in this CRADA. This consideration is based on General
Dynamics': (1) Expertise, experience, and interest in asset tracking
and non-verbal communications exchange technology; and (2) capability
to provide the significant contributions required for the CRADA work.
However, we do not wish to exclude other viable participants from this
or future similar CRADAs.
    This is a technology transfer/development effort. Presently, the
Coast Guard has no plan to acquire asset tracking and non-verbal
communications exchange technology. Since the goal of this CRADA is to
identify and investigate the advantages, disadvantages, performance,
costs, and other issues associated with using asset tracking and non-
verbal communications exchange technology, and not to set future Coast
Guard acquisition requirements for such technology, non-Federal CRADA
partners will not be excluded from any future Coast Guard procurements
based solely on their participation within this CRADA.
    Special consideration will be given to small business firms/
consortia, and preference will be given to business units located in
the U.S.

Authority

    This notice is issued under the authority of 15 U.S.C. 3710(a), 5
U.S.C. 552(a), and 33 CFR 1.05-1.

    Dated: March 19, 2012.
Alan N. Arsenault,
Captain, USCG, Commanding Officer, Research and Development Center.
[FR Doc. 2012-7788 Filed 3-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 15, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52827-52830]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24066]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0659; Product Identifier 2017-CE-014-AD; Amendment
39-19094; AD 2017-22-14]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Rockwell Collins, Inc. Traffic
Surveillance System Processing Unit

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Rockwell Collins, Inc. TSS-4100 Traffic Surveillance System Processing
Units that incorporate TSSA-4100 Field Loadable Software (FLS) Rockwell
Collins part numbers 810-0052-002/-003/-010/-011/-012/-100/-101 and are
installed on airplanes. This AD was prompted by five instances of air
traffic control observing coasting (extrapolated stale data) of
automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast data (position/velocity
data). This AD requires installing the TSSA-4100 FLS upgrades on the
TSS-4100 units. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective December 20, 2017.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of December 20,
2017.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Rockwell Collins, Inc., Collins Aviation Services, 400 Collins
Road NE., M/S 164-100, Cedar Rapids, IA 52498-0001; telephone: 888-265-
5467 (U.S.) or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER> (outside U.S.); email:
[email protected]; Internet: https://portal.rockwellcollins.com/web/publications-and-training. You may view
this service information at the FAA, Policy and Innovation Division,
901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is
also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0659.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0659; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office
(phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Document Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Rau, Aerospace Engineer, Wichita
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Rockwell Collins,
Inc. TSS-4100 Traffic Surveillance System Processing Units that
incorporate TSSA-4100 Field Loadable Software (FLS) Rockwell Collins
part numbers 810-0052-002/-003/-010/-011/-012/-100/-101 and are
installed on airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on
July 3, 2017 (82 FR 30802). The NPRM was prompted by five instances of
air traffic control observing coasting (extrapolated stale data)
automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast data (ADS-B position/
velocity data) on a related Rockwell Collins, Inc. platform that shares
a common architecture with the TSS-4100 Traffic Surveillance System
Processing Units. An investigation of the events determined that the
ADS-B position and the Mode S/traffic alert and collision avoidance
system (TCAS) altitude of the TSS-4100 are affected. This condition, if
not corrected, could result in misleading position and/or altitude
being reported by the airplane. Misleading altitude data can adversely
affect TCAS and possibly lead to mid-air collision due to an incorrect
initial resolution advisory (RA) and/or an incorrect RA modification.
The extrapolation of the data occurs with no warning to the crew. The
NPRM proposed to require updating the TSSA-4100 FLS on the TSS-4100
Traffic Surveillance System Processing Unit. We are issuing this AD to
correct the unsafe condition on these products.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request Reduced Compliance Time

    The Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) requested we reduce the
compliance time for the AD actions. The ALPA requested this change
because of the high number of reports the FAA received and because the
equipment is installed on a variety of airframe types that may operate
in heavily trafficked airspace.
    We disagree with this comment. We considered the variety of
airframe types and operations when we determined the compliance time
for the proposed AD. We proposed within 12 months or 750 hours time-in-
service (TIS), whichever occurs first, and we expect that airframes
with the heaviest usage will require compliance in less than 4 months
after the effective date of the AD. Reducing the compliance time would
create an additional burden not supported by the risk assessments.
    We have not changed this AD based on this comment.

Request a Delayed Effective Date

    Bombardier, Inc. requested we delay the effective date of this AD
until January 1, 2020, when the requirements of 14 CFR 91.225 take
effect. In November 2017, Bombardier, Inc. plans to release service
information for CRJ airplane models that will change the affected TSSA-
4100 FLS part numbers to different part numbers that are not included
the applicability of the AD. Because of the heavy usage of the CRJ
airplanes and the 750 hours TIS of the AD, most CRJ airplanes will
require compliance with the AD by the end of 2017. Also, Bombardier,
Inc. states that air traffic controllers cannot use ADS-B data as a
primary source until 2020; as such, the mid-air collision risk does not
seem clear to them.
    We disagree with this comment. Based on the stated usage, a delay
of the effective date until January 1, 2020, could result in airplanes
accumulating an additional 5,000 hours TIS beyond the 750 hours TIS
compliance proposed in the NPRM. The risk assessment does not support
that significant of an increase in the compliance time for this AD. The
stale or coasting Mode S altitude data interferes with proper TCAS
operation, potentially resulting in an incorrect RA or RA modification.
ADS-B operation is not required for that unsafe condition to exist. As
of August

1, 2017, ADS-B is the primary source of data by air traffic controllers
for separation at all FAA enroute air traffic control facilities and at
over 60 percent of U.S. terminal air traffic control facilities. ADS-B
is also widely used by general aviation airplanes for traffic
awareness. You may provide substantiating data to adjust the compliance
time of this AD and request an alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    We have not changed this AD based on this comment.

Request To Allow Subsequent FLS Part Numbers for Compliance

    Delta Air Lines, Inc. requested we change the language in this AD
to allow the use of subsequent FLS part numbers for compliance with
this AD. They request, for example, we add the words, ``or subsequent''
or ``any subsequent FLS part number that complies with the intent of
this AD'' to allow the use of future part numbers that may comply with
the AD actions.
    We disagree with this comment. RCPN 810-0052-013 or 810-0052-102
are the only part numbers currently available that comply with this AD.
We cannot use language ``or subsequent'' or similar language because we
cannot approve documents or materials that do not currently exist. The
AD only applies to the FLS part numbers listed in the Applicability,
paragraph (c) of this AD, so future software upgrades not listed in
paragraph (c) of this AD are not affected by this AD. Operators may
request an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) to use future FLS
part numbers if they become available using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
    We have not changed this AD based on this comment.

Request To Allow Credit for Work Done With Other Instructions

    Bombardier, Inc. requested that we allow AD credit for operators
who have already completed the replacement of the affected part numbers
using parts found in aircraft illustrated parts catalogs (AIPCs) not
identified in the Applicability, paragraph (c) of this AD. Certain
AIPCs already allow operators to replace some of the affected TSSA-4100
FLS part numbers with part numbers not identified in the Applicability,
paragraph (c) of this AD.
    We disagree with this comment. We recognize that other instructions
for upgrade of the TSSA-4100 exist. However, the actions of this AD
must be completed using the service information cited in the AD and
incorporated by reference into the AD. Operators may request an AMOC,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19, to use service information
other than those referenced in this AD. If, as of the effective date of
this AD, the affected TSSA-4100 FLS part numbers identified in the
Applicability, paragraph (c) of this AD, are not installed on the
airplane, the AD does not apply to that airplane. Therefore, if before
the effective date of this AD, operators replaced the affected TSSA-
4100 FLS part numbers with part numbers not identified in the
Applicability, paragraph (c) of this AD, using the AIPC, they do not
require credit for compliance with this AD because this AD does not
apply to those airplanes.
    We have not changed this AD based on this comment.

Request Changes to the List of Possible Affected Airplanes

    Delta Air Lines, Inc. and Bombardier, Inc. requested we add
Bombardier, Inc. Models CS 100 (BD-500-1A10) and CS300 (BD-500-1A11)
airplanes and remove Bombardier, Inc. Models Global 5000 (BD-700-1A11)
and Challenger 605 (CL-600-2B16) from the Applicability, paragraph (c)
of this AD. The C series include the TSSA-4100 system; however, the
Global 5000 and the Challenger 605 do not have the affected part
numbers installed.
    We agree with this comment. The list of possible affected airplanes
is intended to include airplanes known to have the TSS-4100 installed.
The Bombardier C series airplanes were inadvertently omitted, and we
added them to the Applicability, paragraph (c) of this AD. The Global
5000 without the Global Vision Flight Deck and the Challenger 605 did
not include the installation of the TSS-4100, and we removed them from
the Applicability, paragraph (c) of this AD. However, this AD applies
specifically to TSS-4100 units, RCPN 822-2132-001, that incorporate
TSSA-4100 FLS RCPN 810-0052-002/-003/-010/-011/-012/-100/-101 installed
on airplanes. If the TSS-4100 unit with the affected part numbers is
installed, for example, through an avionics upgrade, on an airplane not
listed in paragraph (c) of this AD, the AD would apply to that
airplane.

Request Clarification of the Unsafe Condition

    Bombardier, Inc. requested we change the language in the Unsafe
Condition, paragraph (e) of this AD, to more accurately describe the
instances of coasting errors. The five observed coasting errors were
not observed on the TSS-4100 units but on different units with similar
software.
    We agree with this comment. We did include more descriptive
language in the preamble of the NPRM and this final rule. We added
similar language to the Unsafe Condition in paragraph (e) of this AD to
clarify the specific units where coasting error were observed.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this final rule with the changes described previously and minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Rockwell Collins Service Information Letter, TSSA-4100-
SIL-10-1, Revision No. 9, dated March 31, 2017; and Rockwell Collins
Service Information Letter, TSSA-4100-SIL-10-1, Revision No. 10, dated
July 10, 2017. The service letters both describe procedures for
determining the part number of the affected FLS and the installation
procedure for updating the FLS; however, Revision No. 10 contains minor
editorial changes not included Revision No. 9. This service information
is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to
it through their normal course of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 1,000 products installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
               Action                         Labor cost            Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upgrade the FLS to RCPN 810-0052-    1 work-hour x $85 per hour             $700            $785        $785,000
 013 or 810-0052-102.                 = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered by the manufacturer, thereby reducing the cost impact
on affected individuals. We do not control manufacturer coverage for
affected individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our
cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to small airplanes and domestic
business jet transport airplanes to the Director of the Policy and
Innovation Division.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2017-22-14 Rockwell Collins, Inc.: Amendment 39-19094; Docket No.
FAA-2017-0659; Product Identifier 2017-CE-014-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective December 20, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    Rockwell Collins, Inc. TSSA-4100 Field Loadable Software (FLS)
Rockwell Collins part numbers (RCPNs) 810-0052-002, -003, -010, -
011, -012, -100, or -101 found on TSS-4100 Traffic Surveillance
System Processing Units, (RCPN) 822-2132-001 installed on airplanes.
    (1) The FLS RCPNs 810-0052-002, -003, -010, -011, -012, -100, or
-101 found on TSS-4100 Traffic Surveillance System Processing Units
are known to be installed on but not limited to the airplanes listed
in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (14) of this AD and are certificated
in any category.

(i) Bombardier Challenger 300 (BD-100-1A10)
(ii) Bombardier Challenger 350 (BD-100-1A10)
(iii) Bombardier Challenger 650 (CL-600-2B16)
(iv) Bombardier CRJ-700 (CL-600-2C10)
(v) Bombardier CRJ-900 (CL-600-2D24)
(vi) Bombardier CRJ-1000 (CL-600-2E25)
(vii) Bombardier CS100 (BD-500-1A10)
(viii) Bombardier CS300 (BD-500-1A11)
(ix) Bombardier Global 5000 equipped with Global Vision Flight Deck
(BD-700-1A11)
(x) Bombardier Global 6000 (BD-700-1A10)
(xi) Cessna Citation CJ4 (525C)
(xii) Embraer Legacy (EMB-550)
(xiii) Embraer Legacy 450 (EMB-545)
(xiv) Gulfstream G280

    (2) Earlier revision levels of the Rockwell Collins, Inc.
service information and service information issued by airplane
manufacturers before the effective date of this AD may have
specified the installation of FLS with different FAA-approved part
numbers than the part numbers listed in paragraph (c) of this AD.
If, before December 20, 2017 (the effective date of this AD), a part
number that is different than the TSSA-4100 RCPNs listed in
paragraph (c) of this AD is installed on the airplane, this AD does
not apply to that airplane.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 34, Navigation.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by five instances of air traffic control
observing coasting (extrapolated stale data) automatic dependent
surveillance-broadcast data (ADS-B position/velocity data) on a
related Rockwell Collins, Inc. platform that shares a common
architecture with the TSS-4100 Traffic Surveillance System
Processing Units. We are issuing this AD to prevent erroneous
extrapolation of position/velocity and altitude data that could
result in misleading position and/or altitude being reported by the
airplane and possibly lead to mid-air collision.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Upgrade of FLS

    Within the next 12 months after December 20, 2017 (the effective
date of this AD) or within the next 750 hours time-in-service after
December 20, 2017 (the effective date of this AD), whichever occurs
first, upgrade the TSSA-4100 FLS to RCPN 810-0052-013 or 810-0052-
102, as applicable, following Rockwell Collins Service Information
Letter, TSSA-4100-SIL-10-1, Revision No. 9, dated

March 31, 2017; or Rockwell Collins Service Information Letter TSSA-
4100-SIL-10-1, Revision No. 10, dated July 10, 2017.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Wichita ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

 (i) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Paul Rau, Aerospace
Engineer, Wichita ACO, FAA, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Wichita,
Kansas 67209; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Rockwell Collins Service Information Letter, TSSA-4100-SIL-
10-1, Revision No. 9, dated March 31, 2017.
    (ii) Rockwell Collins Service Information Letter, TSSA-4100-SIL-
10-1, Revision No. 10, dated July 10, 2017.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Rockwell Collins, Inc., Collins Aviation Services, 400 Collins Road
NE., M/S 164-100, Cedar Rapids, IA 52498-0001; telephone: 888-265-
5467 (U.S.) or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER> (outside U.S.);
email: [email protected]; Internet: https://portal.rockwellcollins.com/web/publications-and-training.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Policy and
Innovation Division, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148. It is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2017-0659.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to:

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on October 26, 2017.
Pat Mullen,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-24066 Filed 11-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 13, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 71)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 19124-19126]
[DOCID:fr13ap06-13]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2005-TN-0008-200534(a); FRL-8157-8]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Tennessee:
Revisions to Volatile Organic Compound Definition

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the Tennessee State
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted by the Tennessee Department of
Environment and Conservation (TDEC) on September 7, 1998. This revision
adds 16 compounds to the list of compounds excluded from the definition
of ``Volatile Organic Compound'' (VOC).

DATES: This direct final rule is effective June 12, 2006 without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by May 15, 2006. If
adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2005-TN-0008, by one of the following methods:
    1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for

submitting comments.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2005-TN-0008,'' Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
    5. Hand Delivery or Courier: James Hou, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division 12th floor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. ``EPA-R04-OAR-
2005-TN-0008.'' EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal

information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through http://www.regulations.gov
 or e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI

or otherwise protected. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an

``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be

automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm
.

    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some

information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov
 or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30
excluding legal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Hou, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404)
562-8965. Mr. Hou can also be reached via electronic mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Analysis of State's Submittal

    On September 7, 1998, the TDEC submitted a revision to the
Tennessee SIP. In response to EPA's revision to its definition of VOC,
published on August 25, 1997, in the Federal Register (62 FR 4490), the
State of Tennessee has changed Chapter 1200-3-18 Tennessee Code
Annotated, by adding 16 compounds to the list of compounds excluded
from the definition of VOC, on the basis that these compounds have
negligible contribution to tropospheric ozone formation. The 16
compounds added to the list of negligibly reactive compounds are shown
below in Table 1. Additionally, the State of Tennessee has added methyl
acetate and perflurocarbon compounds to the list of compounds excluded
from the definition of VOC in accordance with EPA's VOC definition, as
published on April 9, 1998, in the Federal Register (63 FR 17331).
Methyl acetate and perflurocarbon compounds excluded from the
definition of VOC are those that fall into the following categories:

    (i) Cyclic, branched, or linear; completely fluorinated alkanes;
    (ii) Cyclic, branched or linear completely fluorinated ethers with
no unsaturations;
    (iii) Cyclic, branched, or linear completely fluorinated tertiary
amines with no unsaturations; and
    (iv) Sulfur containing perflouocarbons with no unsaturations and
with sulfur bonds only to carbon and fluorine.

      Compounds Added to the List of Negligibly Reactive Compounds
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Compound                          Chemical name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
HFC-32...............................  Difluoromethane.
HFC-161..............................  Ethylfluoride.
HFC-236fa............................  1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoropropane.
HFC-245ca............................  1,1,2,2,3-pentafluoropropane.
HFC-245ea............................  1,1,2,3,3-pentafluoropropane.
HFC-245eb............................  1,1,1,2,3-pentafluoropropane.
HFC-245fa............................  1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane.
HFC-236ea............................  1,1,1,2,3,3-hexafluoropropane.
HFC-365mfc...........................  1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane.
HCFC-31..............................  Chlorofluoromethane.
HCFC-123a............................  1,2-dichloro-1,1,2-
                                        trifluoroethane.
HCFC-151a............................  1-chloro-1-fluoroethane.
C4F9OCH3.............................  1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4-nonafluoro-4-
                                        methoxybutane.
(CF3)2CFCF2OCH3......................  2-(difluoromethoxymethyl)-
                                        1,1,1,2,3,3,3-
                                        heptafluoropropane.
C4F9OC2H5............................  1-ethoxy-1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4-
                                        nonafluorobutane.
(CF3)CFCF2OC2H5......................  2-(ethoxydifluoromethyl)-
                                        1,1,1,2,3,3,3-
                                        heptafluoropropane.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Final Action

    EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to the State of
Tennessee SIP, because they are consistent with EPA policy and the
Clean Air Act (CAA). EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal
because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and
anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate
document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision
should adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective June 12,
2006 without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments
by May 15, 2006.
    If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public
is advised that this rule will be effective on June 12, 2006 and no
further action will be taken on the proposed rule. Please note that if
we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of
the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are
not the subject of an adverse comment.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Review

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA.
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to
disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 12, 2006. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: March 31, 2006.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

0
40 CFR part 52, is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart (RR)--(Tennessee)

0
2. Section 52.2220(c) is amended by revising the entry for ``Section
1200-3-18-.01'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.220(c).  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                      EPA-Approved (Tennessee) Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     EPA approval
         State citation            Title/subject     Adoption date       date         Federal Register  notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
1200-3-18-.01..................  Definitions......        09/01/99        04/13/06  [Insert first page of
                                                                                publication]

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 06-3490 Filed 4-12-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46709-46711]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18830]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-2012-0567; FRL-9914-94-Region-5]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Indiana; Indiana PSD Increments

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a component of a state implementation plan (SIP)
submission from Indiana addressing EPA's requirements for the
prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) program. The proposed
rulemaking associated with today's final action was published on August
19, 2013.

DATES: This final rule is effective on September 10, 2014.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2012-0567. All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be
publicly-available only in hard copy. Publicly-available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air
and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We recommend that you
telephone Andy Chang at<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting the Region 5
office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy Chang, Environmental Engineer,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. What is the background of the SIP submissions?
    A. What state SIP submissions does this rulemaking address?
    B. Why did the state make these SIP submissions?
    C. What is the scope of this rulemaking?
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What is the background of the SIP submissions?

A. What state SIP submissions does this rulemaking address?

    This final rulemaking addresses a portion of a July 12, 2012,
submission and a December 12, 2012, supplemental submission from the
Indiana Department of Environmental Quality (IDEM). These submissions
were made to satisfy certain EPA requirements for the state's PSD
program.

B. Why did the state make these SIP submissions?

    On October 20, 2010, EPA issued the final rule on the ``Prevention
of Significant Deterioration (PSD) for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5
Micrometers (PM2.5)--Increments, Significant Impact Levels
(SILs) and Significant Monitoring Concentration (SMC)'' (2010 NSR
Rule). This rule established several components for making PSD
permitting determinations for PM2.5, including a system of
``increments'' which is the mechanism used to estimate significant
deterioration of ambient air quality for a pollutant. These increments
are codified in 40 CFR 51.166(c) and 40 CFR 52.21(c), and are included
in the table below.

Table 1: PM2.5 Increments Established by the 2010 NSR Rule in Micrograms
                             per Cubic Meter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Annual
                                     arithmetic mean      24-hour max
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Class I...........................                  1                  2
Class II..........................                  4                  9
Class III.........................                  8                 18
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On July 12, 2012, and supplemented on December 12, 2012, IDEM
submitted revisions intended to address the increments established by
the 2010 NSR Rule for incorporation into the SIP. Specifically,
revisions to 326 IAC 2-2-6(b) contained the Federal increments for
PM2.5 for Class II areas.

C. What is the scope of this rulemaking?

    On August 19, 2013, EPA proposed to approve various Clean Air Act
(CAA) requirements, including Indiana's satisfaction of the
infrastructure SIP requirements \1\ for the 2008 ozone and 2008 lead
National Ambient Air Quality Standards, Indiana's satisfaction of the
state board requirements obligated by section 128 of the CAA, and
Indiana's satisfaction of the PSD requirements obligated by the 2010
NSR Rule. Among these components was 326 IAC 2-2-6(b), which contains
the Federally promulgated PM2.5 increments for Class II
areas in the state. Currently, there are no Class I or Class III areas
in the state, and EPA did not receive any comments related to its
proposed approval of this provision.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The infrastructure SIP requirements are designed to ensure
that the structural components of each state's air quality
management program are adequate to meet the state's responsibilities
under the CAA.
    \2\ EPA did receive an adverse comment related to Indiana's lack
of increments for Class I and Class III areas. We will address this
comment in a future rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. What action Is EPA taking?

    For the reasons discussed in our August 19, 2013, proposed
rulemaking, EPA is taking final action to approve, as proposed, 326 IAC
2-2-6(b) into Indiana's SIP. Specifically, 326 IAC 2-2-6(b) contains
the Federally promulgated PM2.5 increments for Class II
areas, pursuant to 40 CFR 51.166(c) and 40 CFR 52.21(c).

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 10, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: July 29, 2014.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  52.770 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry for ``2-2-6'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.770  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                        EPA-Approved Indiana Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Indiana effective
        Indiana citation              Subject              date          EPA approval date          Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
                       Rule 2. Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
2-2-6...........................       Increment   7/11/2012..........  8/11/2014, [INSERT   (b) only
                                    consumption;                         Federal Register
                                    requirements                         CITATION].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-18830 Filed 8-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 145 (Thursday, July 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45333-45334]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18837]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; Notice of Application for
Special Permits

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: List of applications for special permits

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations (49 CFR Part 107,
Subpart B), notice is hereby given that the Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety has received the application described herein. Each
mode of transportation for which a particular special permit is
requested is indicated by a number in the ``Nature of Application''
portion of the table below as follows: 1--Motor vehicle, 2--Rail
freight, 3--Cargo vessel, 4--Cargo aircraft only, 5--Passenger-carrying
aircraft.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 29, 2011.
    Address Comments To: Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials, Safety Administration U.S. Department of Transportation,
Washington, DC 20590.
    Comments should refer to the application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of comments is desired, include
a self-addressed stamped postcard showing the special permit number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the applications are
available for inspection in the Records Center, East Building, PHH-30,
1200 New Jersey Avenue Southeast, Washington DC or at http://regulations.gov.
    This notice of receipt of applications for special permit is
published in accordance with Part 107 of the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 21, 2011.
Donald Burger,
Chief, General Approvals and Permits.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Regulation(s)     Nature of special permits
    Application No.        Docket No.           Applicant              affected                 thereof
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               NEW SPECIAL PERMITS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15220-N...............  ................  GasCon (Pty) Ltd Cape  49 CFR 178.274(b)     To authorize the
                                           Town.                  and 178.277(b)(1).    manufacture, marking,
                                                                                sale and use of UN
                                                                                portable tanks that are
                                                                                designed, constructed,
                                                                                certified and stamped in
                                                                                accordance with Section
                                                                                VIII Division 1, latest
                                                                                edition, of ASME Code.
                                                                                (modes 1, 2, 3)
15381-N...............  ................  ATK Clearfield, UT...  49 CFR 178.71.......  To authorize the
                                                                                transportation in
                                                                                commerce of certain UN
                                                                                cylinders which have
                                                                                been alternatively
                                                                                tested. (modes 1,4)
15382-N...............  ................  Lockheed Martin Space  49 CFR 177.834(1)(1)  To authorize the
                                           Systems Company                              transportation in
                                           Sunnyvale, CA.                               commerce of certain
                                                                                Division 1.4 explosives
                                                                                in a motor vehicle
                                                                                equipped with a cargo
                                                                                heater that has not been
                                                                                rendered inoperable.
                                                                                (mode 1)
15384-N...............  ................  TEA Technologies,      49 CFR 180.509......  To authorize an
                                           Inc. Amarillo, TX.                           alternative method of
                                                                                retest for DOT
                                                                                Specification 107A
                                                                                cylinders for use in
                                                                                transporting liquified
                                                                                or nonliquefied
                                                                                compressed gases, or
                                                                                mixtures. (modes 1, 2,
                                                                                3)
15386-N...............  ................  MAC, LLC Bay Saint     49 CFR 173.56.......  To authorize the one-
                                           Louis, MS.                                   time, one-way
                                                                                transportation in
                                                                                commerce of two (2) 5-
                                                                                gallon buckets
                                                                                containing wetted waste
                                                                                primers and three (3) 5-
                                                                                gallon buckets
                                                                                containing wetted waste
                                                                                propellant by a contract
                                                                                carrier for disposal
                                                                                without an EX approval.
                                                                                (mode 1)
15389-N...............  ................  AMETEK Ameron LLC d/b/ 9 CFR 49 CFR          To authorize the
                                           a MASS Systems         173.301(a)(1),        manufacture, marking,
                                           Baldwin Park, CA.      173.301(a)(1),        sale and use of on-DOT
                                                                  173302a(a)(1), and    specification
                                                                  173.304a(a)(1).       highpressure
                                                                                longitudinal welded and
                                                                                drawn cylinder for
                                                                                transportation of
                                                                                compressed oxygen,
                                                                                flammable or non-
                                                                                flammable gases. (modes
                                                                                1, 2, 3, 4, 5)

15397-N...............  ................  Northern Pioneer       49 CFR 172.101        To authorize the
                                           Helicopters, LLC Big   Column (9B),          transportation in
                                           Lake, AK.              172.204(c)(3),        commerce of certain
                                                                  173.27(b)(2),         hazardous materials by
                                                                  175.30(a)(1),         cargo aircraft including
                                                                  172.200, 172.300      by external load in
                                                                  and 172.400.          remote areas of Alaska
                                                                                without being subject to
                                                                                hazard communication
                                                                                requirements and
                                                                                quantity limitations
                                                                                where no other means of
                                                                                transportation is
                                                                                available. (mode 4)
15399-N...............  ................  Cheyenne Light Fuel    49 CFR 173.301(a)(1)  To authorize the
                                           and Power Company.     and 173.302a.         transportation in
                                                                                commerce of a Type 4
                                                                                cylinder, resin
                                                                                impregnated, and fully
                                                                                wrapped continuous
                                                                                filament with a non-
                                                                                metallic liner
                                                                                containing methane.
                                                                                (mode 1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2011-18837 Filed 7-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4909-60-M