[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24347-24349]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9395]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-1223; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-173-AD;
Amendment 39-17027; AD 2012-08-10]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-604 Variant) airplanes. This AD
was prompted by reports of the air driven generator (ADG) failing to
power essential buses during functional tests, due to the low threshold
setting of the circuit protection on the ADG's generator control unit
(GCU) preventing the ADG from supplying power to the essential buses.
This AD requires installing a new or serviceable ADG GCU. We are
issuing this AD to prevent loss of power from the ADG to the essential
buses which, in the event of an emergency, could prevent continued safe
flight.

DATES: This AD becomes effective May 29, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference

of certain publications listed in this AD as of May 29, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assata Dessaline, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on November 8, 2011 (76
FR 69155). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    There have been several occurrences of the air driven generator
(ADG) failure to power essential buses during functional tests of
the ADG. It was found that the low threshold setting of the circuit
protection on the ADG generator control unit (GCU) can prevent the
supply of power from the ADG to the essential buses. In the event of
an emergency, loss of power to the essential buses can prevent
continued safe flight.
    This [TCCA] directive mandates the replacement of the ADG GCU.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received.

Request To Remove Unaffected Airplane Models

    Bombardier requested that we revise the proposed applicability to
remove Model CL-601-3A and CL-601-3R airplanes.
    We agree. We have removed these models from the Summary and
paragraph (c) of this AD, since only the Model CL-604 variant is
affected.

Explanation of Change to Costs of Compliance Section

    The Costs of Compliance section has been updated to show a more
accurate cost to operators. The work-hours quoted in Bombardier Service
Bulletins 604-24-023 and 605-24-003, dated April 27, 2011, include only
the labor time required for replacement, while Hamilton Sundstrand
Service Bulletin ERPS10G-24-1, dated February 9, 2011, estimates 4
work-hours for replacing the printed wiring assemblies in the GCU and
functional testing of the ADG. Because it may be necessary to do a non-
destructive test (NDT) inspection on some airplanes, we have added an
additional work-hour, for a total estimate of 6 work-hours.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 70 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 6 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $0 per product.
Where the service information lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge
for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators
to be $35,700, or $510 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (76 FR 69155, November 8,
2011), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2012-08-10 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-17027. Docket No. FAA-
2011-1223; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-173-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective May 29,
2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-604
Variant) airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers
5408 through 5665 inclusive, and 5701 through 5856 inclusive.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24: Electrical
Power.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of the air driven generator
(ADG) failing to power essential buses during functional tests, due
to the low threshold setting of the circuit protection on the ADG's
generator control unit (GCU) preventing the ADG from supplying power
to the essential buses. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of
power from the ADG to the essential buses which, in the event of an
emergency, could prevent continued safe flight.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Actions

    Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, remove the
ADG GCU, Bombardier part number (P/N) 604-90800-7 (Hamilton
Sundstrand P/N 761341A), and install a new or serviceable ADG GCU
Bombardier P/N 604-90800-27 (Hamilton Sundstrand P/N 761341B), in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 605-24-003, dated April 25, 2011 (for airplane
serial numbers 5701 through 5856); or Bombardier Service Bulletin
604-24-023, dated April 25, 2011 (for airplane serial numbers 5408
through 5665).

    Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD:  Bombardier Service
Bulletins 605-24-003 and 604-24-023, both dated April 25, 2011,
refer to Hamilton Sundstrand Service Bulletin ERPS10G-24-1, dated
February 9, 2011, as an additional source of guidance for modifying
and testing the ADG GCU with new printed wiring assemblies, and re-
identifying the GCU using a new part number.

(h) Parts Installation

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install an
ADG GCU, Bombardier P/N 604-90800-7 (Hamilton Sundstrand P/N
761341A), on any airplane.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
10, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 516-794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(j) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2011-25, dated
July 25, 2011; Bombardier Service Bulletin 605-24-003, dated April
25, 2011; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 604-24-023, dated April
25, 2011; for related information.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) You must use the following service information to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference (IBR) of the following service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51:
    (i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 605-24-003, dated April 25,
2011.
    (ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 604-24-023, dated April 25,
2011.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 10, 2012.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-9395 Filed 4-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31899-31900]
[FR Doc No: E9-15877]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0231; Airspace Docket No. 09-AAL-6]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Chuathbaluk, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace at
Chuathbaluk, AK. One Standard Instrument Approach Procedure (SIAP) is
being developed for the Chuathbaluk Airport at Chuathbaluk, AK.
Adoption of this proposal would result in creating Class E airspace
upward from 700 feet (ft.) above the surface at the Chuathbaluk
Airport, Chuathbaluk, AK.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 20, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the proposal to the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-
0001. You must identify the docket number FAA-2009-0231/Airspace Docket
No. 09-AAL-6, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit
comments on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review
the public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and
any final disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket
Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527) is on the plaza level of the
Department of Transportation NASSIF Building at the above address.
    An informal docket may also be examined during normal business
hours at the office of the Manager, Safety, Alaska Flight Service
Operations, Federal Aviation Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box
14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7587.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Rolf, Federal Aviation
Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7587;
telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet address: http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/systemops/fs/alaskan/rulemaking/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2009-0231/
Airspace Docket No. 08-AAL-6.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of Notice of Proposed Rulemakings (NPRMs)

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov or the Superintendent of Document's Web page at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html.
    Additionally, any person may obtain a copy of this notice by
submitting a request to the Federal Aviation Administration, Office of
Air Traffic Airspace Management, ATA-400, 800 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591 or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. Communications must
identify both docket numbers for this notice. Persons interested in
being placed on a mailing list for future NPRMs should contact the
FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>, to request a copy of
Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Distribution
System, which describes the application procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is considering an amendment to the Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR part 71), which would establish Class E airspace at
the Chuathbaluk Airport, in Chuathbaluk, AK. The intended effect of
this proposal is to create Class E airspace upward from 700 ft. above
the surface to contain Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the
Chuathbaluk Airport, Chuathbaluk, AK.

    The FAA Instrument Flight Procedures Production and Maintenance
Branch has created one new SIAP for the Chuathbaluk Airport. The SIAP
is the Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System (GPS) Runway
(RWY) 9, Original. Class E controlled airspace extending upward from
700 ft. above the surface in the Chuathbaluk Airport area would be
established by this action. The proposed airspace is sufficient in size
to contain aircraft executing this instrument procedure at the
Chuathbaluk Airport, Chuathbaluk, AK.
    The area would be depicted on aeronautical charts for pilot
reference. The coordinates for this airspace docket are based on North
American Datum 83. The Class E airspace areas designated as 700/1200
foot transition areas are published in paragraph 6005 in FAA Order
7400.9S, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed October 3,
2008, and effective October 31, 2008, which is incorporated by
reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in
this document would be published subsequently in the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore --(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Because this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart 1, Section 40103, Sovereignty and use of
airspace. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing
regulations to ensure the safe and efficient use of the navigable
airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because
it proposes to create Class E airspace sufficient in size to contain
aircraft executing instrument procedures at the Chuathbaluk Airport,
AK, and represents the FAA's continuing effort to safely and
efficiently use the navigable airspace.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9S, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, signed October 3, 2008, and effective October 31,
2008, is to be amended as follows:
* * * * *

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Extending Upward From 700 Feet or
More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AAL AK E5 Chuathbaluk, AK [New]

Chuathbaluk, Chuathbaluk Airport, AK
    (Lat. 61[deg]34'44'' N., long. 159[deg]12'56'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7.5-mile radius of the Chuathbaluk Airport, AK, and within
3.5 miles either side of the 286[deg] bearing from the Chuathbaluk
Airport, AK, extending from the 6.5 mile radius, to 10.3 miles west
of the Chuathbaluk, Airport, AK.
* * * * *

    Issued in Anchorage, AK, on June 24, 2009.
Anthony M. Wylie,
Manager, Alaska Flight Services Information Area Group.
[FR Doc. E9-15877 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF
AIR QUALITY

Inspection Report
Date:  02/16/2017
Winston-Salem Regional Office
MillerCoors LLC - Eden Brewery
NC Facility ID  7900090
County/FIPS: Rockingham/157
Facility Data
MillerCoors LLC - Eden Brewery
863 East Meadow Road
Eden, NC       27288
Lat: 36d 31.1333m     Long: 79d 42.9500m
SIC:  2082 / Malt Beverages
NAICS:  31212 / Breweries

Permit Data
Permit     03116 / R24
Issued     10/26/2015
Expires   9/30/2023
Classification  Synthetic Minor
Permit Status  Active
Current Permit Application(s) None

                             Program Applicability

SIP / 112r
MACT Part 63:  Subpart 6C, Subpart ZZZZ
NSPS:  Subpart IIII

Contact Data

Facility Contact
Michael Lozano
Unit Manager-Utilities &WWTP
(336) 627-2502
Authorized Contact
Yves Owens
Technical Service Manager
(336) 627-2502
Technical Contact
Michael Lozano
Unit Manager-Utilities &WWTP
(336) 627-2502

Comments:

Inspector's Signature:

Date of Signature:                                                                                RS
Compliance Data
Inspection Date  02/14/2017
Inspector's Name  Maria Aloyo
Operating Status  Operating
Compliance Code   Compliance - inspection
Action Code            PCE
On-Site Inspection Result     Compliance
  Total Actual emissions in TONS/YEAR:

                                      TSP
                                      SO2
                                      NOX
                                      VOC
                                      CO
                                     PM10
                                     * HAP
2015
0.5800
 ---
0.0500
72.49
0.0500
0.4800
4899.64
2014
24.20
371.08
211.39
79.24
5.00
4.33
22953.60

                                              * Highest HAP Emitted (in pounds)
Five Year Violation History:
Date
Letter Type
Rule Violated
Violation Resolution Date

04/09/2013
NOV/NRE
Permit Permit Condition
04/19/2013
03/11/2013
NOV
Permit Late Title V ACC
03/20/2013
03/11/2013
NOV
Permit Permit Condition
03/20/2013

Performed Stack Tests since last FCE: None
Date
Test Results
Test Method(s)
Source(s) Tested

INTRODUCTION
ON FEBRUARY 14, 2017, Maria Aloyo, DAQ-WSRO Environmental Engineer, made contact with Mr. Michael Lozano, Utilities & WWTP Unit Manager, and Mr. Drew Lucas, Consultant, at the above referenced facility for an unannounced compliance inspection.  The facility is a beer brewing and packaging facility.  Blair Palmer, of DAQ-WSRO previously inspected this facility on September 22, 2016 and was found to be in compliance with all applicable Air Quality regulations.  During Mr. Palmer's inspection, he noted that the "facility is essentially closed and the facility will request a permit rescission soon."  Based on the two most recent quarterly reports received at DAQ-WSRO on October 20, 2016 and January 23, 2017, the facility has not been in operation since September 2016.  Since the facility is not operating and has not submitted a permit rescission request, this compliance inspection served as a status update.

PERMITTED SOURCES
EMISSION
Source ID
                          Emission Source
Description
                               Control
System ID
                          Control System
Description
                                     ES-15
                     One brewhouse cleaning vacuum system
                                   CD-15A.2
                                   CD-15B.2
One cyclone (30 inches in diameter) (CD-15A.2) and one bagfilter (86 square feet of filter area) (CD-15B.2) in series

                                   CD-15A.1
                                   CD-15B.1
One cyclone (30 inches in diameter) (CD-15A.1) and one bagfilter (86 square feet of filter area) (CD-15B.1) in series
                                     ES-24
                                 Cold services
                                      N/A
                                      N/A
                                     ES-31
                               Product packaging
                                      N/A
                                      N/A
                                     ES-32
       One quality control coding ink application on the packaging lines
                                      N/A
                                      N/A
                  ES-37 (EmGen) (NSPS IIII & NESHAP ZZZZ)
                        One (150 kW electrical output;
                           270 hp engine) emergency
                          diesel fuel fired generator
                                      N/A
                                      N/A
                                    ES-39
                         (NSPS IIII & NESHAP ZZZZ)
                         One (140 HP) Diesel Fire Pump
                                      N/A
                                      N/A
                                     ES40
                   Cold cleaner degreasers (six degreasers)
                                      N/A
                                      N/A
                                      ES9
                        Hot melt adhesives application
                                      N/A
                                      N/A
                                     ES30
                           Application of label glue
                                      N/A
                                      N/A
                                    ES-41
                         (NSPS IIII & NESHAP ZZZZ)
                         One (140 Hp) Diesel Fire Pump
                                      N/A
                                      N/A
INSIGNIFICANT/EXEMPT SOURCES
SOURCE
                             Exemption Regulation
                                Source of TAPs?
                         Source of Title V Pollutants?
                        IES1 - Warehousing operations
                        (including bottle warehousing)
                             2Q .0102 (c)(2)(E)(i)
                                      No
                                      Yes
                            IES2 - Spent grain silo

                                      No
                                      Yes
                      IES5 - Ammonia refrigerator system

                                      Yes
                                      Yes
                          IES6 - CO2 recovery system

                                      No
                                      No
                   IES7 - Specialty malt handling/receiving

                                      No
                                      Yes
                   IES8 - Spice addition system to brewhouse

                                      No
                                      Yes
                      IES12.1, IES12.2 - Two diesel fuel
                  storage tanks (2,500-gallon capacity each)
                             2Q .0102 (c)(1)(D)(i)
                                      Yes
                                      Yes
                          IES13 (NESHAP CCCCCC)  -
                          One gasoline storage tank
                            (2,500-gallon capacity)
                            2Q .0102 (c)(1)(D)(ii)
                                      Yes
                                      Yes
                            IES14 - Cooling towers
                             2Q .0102 (c)(2)(E)(i)
                                      Yes
                                      Yes
                 IES15 - Utilities carbon regeneration system

                                      No
                                      No
                          IES16 - One used oil tank
                            (1,000-gallon capacity)
                             2Q .0102 (c)(1)(D)(i)
                                      Yes
                                      Yes
IES18 - One raw materials unloading and transfer system, including the unloading pit, and malt, grit, black malt, and
                caramel malt silos with associated bagfilters
                   (Nos. CD-11A and CD-11B) (formerly ES11)
                             2Q .0102 (c)(2)(E)(i)
                                      No
                                      Yes
IES19 - One grain transfer system, including Nos. 1 and 2 malt receivers, grit receiver, and malt mills with associated bagfilters
               (Nos. CD-12A, CD-12B, and CD-12D) (formerly ES12)

IES20 - One wastewater treatment plant lime storage silo with associated bagfilter
                          (No. CD-21) (formerly ES21)

       IES21 - General maintenance - welding, degreasing, grinding, etc.
                            2Q .0102 (c)(1)(L)(xii)
                                      Yes
                                      Yes
IES22 - Premix room, DE warehouse, Precoat and Body feed and outside the ceramic filter room controlled by multiple fabric filters
                    for diatomaceous earth handling system
                             2Q .0102 (c)(2)(E)(i)
                                      No
                                      Yes
                   IES23 - Brewhouse (including wort tanks)

                    IES26 - Diatomaceous earth premix tanks

                   IES27 - One Igniter Oil Storage Tank for
                      ES1 and ES2 (8000-gallon capacity)
                             2Q .0102 (c)(1)(D)(i)
                                      Yes
                                      Yes
IES28.1 - One Diesel Fuel Storage Tank for Fire Pump IES 3.1 (550-gallon capacity)

IES28.2 - One Diesel Fuel Storage Tank for Fire Pump IES 3.2 (550-gallon capacity)

IES29 - One No. 2 Oil Storage Tank for WWTP Boiler ES6 (10,000-gallon capacity)

                      IES-36 - Wastewater treatment plant
                              2Q .0102 (c)(1)(F)
                                      No
                                      No
                      IES33 - Diatomaceous earth handling
                             2Q .0102 (c)(2)(E)(i)
                                      No
                                      Yes
SAFETY/SECURITY
WHEN IN OPERATION, Safety shoes, safety glasses, hard hat and hearing protection are required at the facility.  General safety practices should always be followed.  Security guards allow state inspectors to park in the parking lot inside the facility rather than the visitors' parking lot.

LATITUDE/LONGITUDE VERIFICATION
THE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE COORDINATES OF THE FACILITY WERE VERIFIED AND ARE CORRECTLY DOCUMENTED IN IBEAM.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
MILLERCOORS, LLC is subject to the following regulations:  Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC), Subchapter 2D .0202, 2D .0515, 2D .0516, 2D .0521, 2D .0524 (40 CFR 60, Subpart IIII), 2D .0535, 2D .0540, 2D .0605, 2D .1100, 2D .1111 (40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ), 2D .1806, 2D .2100, 2Q .0102, and 2Q .0315.
DISCUSSION
UPON ARRIVAL TO THE FACILITY, IT WAS EVIDENT THAT MILLERCOORS, LLC in Eden, NC was shut down.  This inspector met with Mr. Lozano and Mr. Lucas who confirmed that the brewing operations ceased since July 2016 and the last shipment of beer from the facility was in September 2016.  Mr. Lozano stated that the cold cleaner degreasers (ES40), hot melt adhesive application (ES9), application of label glue (ES30), and the spice addition system to brewhouse (IES8) are no longer onsite.  The only sources currently operating are the one emergency diesel-fired generator (ES-37) and the two diesel-fired emergency fire pumps (ES-39 & ES-41).  The two 550-gallons diesel fuel tanks for the fire pumps (IES28.1 & IES28.2) and the one 2,500-gallons gasoline storage tank (IES13) still contain fuel.  All other sources onsite have been cleaned /flushed and are not in operation.  Mr. Lozano and Mr. Lucas are aware of the permit recession procedure but are unsure of exactly when corporate will submit a permit rescission request to DAQ.  This inspector explained to Mr. Lozano and Mr. Lucas that although the facility is shutdown, the facility is still responsible for the reporting, recordkeeping, maintenance, and work practice requirements outlined in the permit.  After reviewing records, Mr. Lozano guided this inspector to the emergency equipment.

PERMIT CONDITIONS
CONDITION A.2 contains the 2D .0202 permit renewal and emissions inventory requirements. The facility is required to prepare and submit a permit application and emissions inventory 90 days prior to the expiration date of the permit. The facility's permit expires on September 30, 2023 and an emissions inventory will be due for CY2022.  However, the facility plans to rescind their permit due to cessation of operations but Mr. Lozano and Mr. Lucas were unaware of the exactly when the permit rescission request will be submitted.  The facility appears to be in compliance with 2D .0202.

Condition A.3 contains the 2D .0515 requirements for controlling particulate matter emissions from miscellaneous industrial processes.  The Brew House Cleaning Vacuum System (ES-15), the Raw Materials Unloading and Transfer System (IES18), the Grain Transfer System (IES19) and the Wastewater Treatment Plant Lime Storage Silo (IES20) are subject to this rule.  According to permit review R24, the allowable emission rates for ES-15, IES18, IES19, and IES20 are 1.03 lbs./hr., 21.7 lbs./hr., 21.7 lbs./hr., and 20.3 lbs./hr., respectively.  Based on permit review R24, the facility has demonstrated compliance with this regulation.

Condition A.4 contains the 2D .0516 requirements for controlling sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from combustion sources.  According to this regulation, all combustion sources that discharge SO2 emissions from any stack, vent, or chimney must not emit more than 2.3 pounds of SO2 per million BTU input.  This regulation applies to the one emergency diesel-fired generator (ES-37) and the two diesel-fired emergency fire pumps (ES-39 & ES-41).  Based on permit review R24, this facility has demonstrated compliance with this regulation.

Condition A.5 contains the 2D .0521 requirements for controlling visible emissions from emission sources. According to this permit condition, visible emissions are not to exceed 20 percent opacity when averaged over a six-minute period.  Visible emission standards outlined in 15A NCAC 2D .0524 (NSPS) and 15A NCAC 2D .1111 (NESHAP) shall take precedence over the ones listed under this rule.  During the inspection, none of the emission sources were in operation.  The facility appears to be in compliance with 2D .0521.

Condition A.6 contains the 2D .0524 the requirements for complying with the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) federal regulations promulgated by the EPA.  The one emergency diesel-fired generator (ES-37) and the two diesel-fired emergency fire pumps (ES-39 & ES-41) are subject to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart IIII "Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines" and are required to use diesel fuel with a maximum sulfur content of 15 ppm, and a minimum cetane index of 40 or a maximum aromatic content of 35% volume.  These engines are also required to have a non-resettable hour meter installed prior to start-up.  The facility is required to purchase an engine certified to the emission standards as specified under 40 CFR 60, Subpart IIII.  These units are allowed 100 hours per year for maintenance and testing.  The engines can be used for non-emergency purposes up to 50 hours per year which are counted towards the previously allotted 100 hours per year for maintenance and testing.

During the inspection, none of the engines were running.  Each engine was equipped with a non-resettable hour meter and are all certified to EPA standards.  Records show that the engines were only operated for the purpose of maintenance or testing.   Each engine runs for about 15 minutes per week as recommended by the manufacturer for testing purposes.  Mr. Lozano checks the non-resettable hour meter on each engine once per day and he provided this inspector with the logs.  In 2016, ES-37, ES-39, and ES-41 operated for 8.5, 59.1, and 41.1 hours, respectively.  Based on the non-resettable hour meters observed during the inspection, ES-37, ES-39, and ES-41 operated for 0.4, 9.4, and 6.4 hours, respectively, so far in 2017.   The most recent maintenance check performed on the three engines was on February 7, 2017.  This facility is not part of the any emergency demand response program according to Mr. Lozano.  The facility appears to be in compliance with 2D .0524 and 40 CFR 60, Subpart IIII.

Condition A.7 contains the 2D .0535 rule requiring the facility to notify the director of any excess emissions lasting longer than four hours resulting from a malfunction, a breakdown of process or control equipment.  Mr. Lozano and Mr. Lucas indicated that there had not been any excess emissions lasting more than four hours since the last inspection, especially since the facility has not been in operation since September 2016. The facility appears to be in compliance with 2D .0535.

Condition A.8 contains the 2D .0540 fugitive dust control requirements.  At the time of inspection, fugitive dust was not observed beyond the property boundary.  The property has a mixture of paved and green surfaces; therefore, fugitive dust is unlikely.  A review of the facility's file shows no recent fugitive dust complaints have been received by this office.  The facility appears to be in compliance with 2D .0540.

Condition A.9 contains the 2D .0958 work practices for sources of VOC emissions.  This regulation establishes work practices for facilities in nonattainment areas for 8-hour ozone that uses, mixes, manufactures, or emits VOCs.  On November 1, 2016, this regulation was amended and only applies to sources located in any of the designated nonattainment areas for 8-hour ozone listed under 15A NCAC 02D .0902.  Since this facility is located in Rockingham County and this county is classified as in attainment/unclassifiable for all regulated pollutants, this regulation no longer applies. However, since this facility is not operating and most of the equipment has been cleaned, it is likely that the facility is in compliance with this regulation.

Condition A.10 contains the 2D. 1111 requirements for complying with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) federal regulations promulgated by the EPA.  The one emergency diesel-fired generator (ES-37) and the two diesel-fired emergency fire pumps (ES-39 & ES-41) are subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZ "National Emissions Standards for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines."  Since engines are classified as new stationary RICE located at an area source of HAP emissions, the facility meets the requirements of Subpart ZZZZ by meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 60, Subpart IIII as discussed in Condition A.6.  The facility appears to be in compliance with 2D .1111.

Condition A.11 contains the 2D .1806 control and prohibition of odorous emissions requirements.  At the time of inspection, no objectionable odors were detected outside of the facility.  A review of the facility's file shows no recent odor complaints have been received by this office.  The facility appears to be in compliance with 2D .1806.

Condition A.12 contains the 2D .2100 Risk Management Plan requirements under 40 CFR Part 68.  This facility is specifically subject to the Program Level 3 section of 112(r) of the Clean Air Act due to the 100,000 pounds of anhydrous ammonia stored onsite.  On August 15, 2012, a full 112(r) compliance inspection was performed by Mr. Ray Stewart of DAQ-WSRO and the facility was deemed in compliance.  Since the facility ceased production, Mr. Lucas stated that the anhydrous ammonia has been removed from the facility and that the facility had deregistered from the 112(r) program.  The current 112(r) inspector from the DAQ-WSRO, Mr. Robert Barker, confirmed that the facility deregistered effective on August 30, 2016.  This condition no longer applies.

Condition A.13 requires the facility to comply with any federal rule that is applicable to sources exempted from air permitting requirements.  The exempt 2,500-gallons gasoline storage tank (IES13) is subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCCCCC "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Category: Gasoline Dispensing Facilities."  The gasoline storage tank is used for providing fuel to vehicles used onsite.  Currently the tank's throughput is less than 10,000 gallons per month.  Therefore, the tank is only subject to the work practice and recordkeeping requirements.  The facility must not allow gasoline to be handled in a way that would result in vapor releases.  This includes minimizing spills, cleaning up spills quickly, covering all opening to the tanks when not in use, etc.  Mr. Lozano confirmed that the facility continues to tracks the gasoline usage and to implement the work practices.  The facility appears to be in compliance with this regulation.

Condition A.14 contains the 2Q. 0315 (Synthetic Minor) requirements in order to avoid the requirements of 2Q. 0501 (Title V).  To maintain the synthetic minor classification, the facility is limited 100 tons per consecutive 12-month period of PM10 and VOC emissions.  To ensure compliance with this requirement, the facility must perform an annual inspection of the bagfilters and cyclones.  Thirty (30) days after each calendar quarter, the facility must submit to DAQ the tons of VOC emitted for each of the three 12 month periods over the previous 14 months.

The most recent internal inspections for the cyclones and bagfilters were performed on March 9, 2016.  The VOC emissions for 2016 were estimated to be 26.04 tons per year.  The facility adequately maintains the required monthly and annual records.  The most recent quarterly report was received by DAQ on January 23, 2017.  The facility appears to be in compliance with 2Q. 0315.

NSPS/NESHAP/112(r) APPLICABILITY
THE FACILITY IS SUBJECT TO the following National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations.

    40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZ, "National Emissions Standards for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines" as discussed under Condition A.10 above.

    40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCCCCC, "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Category: Gasoline Dispensing Facilities" as discussed under Condition A.13 above.

 The facility is subject to the following New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) regulations.

    40 CFR Part 60, Subpart IIII, "Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines" as discussed under Condition A.6 above.

The facility was subject to 40 CFR Part 68, "Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions" as discussed under Condition A.12 above.

FACILITY EMISSIONS
THE FACILITY-WIDE ACTUAL Emissions are listed in the table below for CY2014 and CY2015.

                                   Pollutant
                           CY 2014 Actual Emissions
                                  [tons/yr.]
                           CY 2015 Actual Emissions
                                  [tons/yr.]
                                      PM
                                     24.2
                                     0.58
                                     PM10
                                     4.33
                                     0.48
                                     PM2.5
                                     2.17
                                     0.36
                                      SO2
                                    371.08
                                 Not Reported
                                      NOx
                                    211.39
                                     0.05
                                      CO
                                      5.0
                                     0.05
                                      VOC
                                     79.24
                                     72.49
                                   HAPTotal
                                    14.950
                                     2.54
                                  HAPHighest
                          11.477 (Hydrogen Chloride)
                                2.45 (Methanol)
PERMIT CONSIDERATIONS
THE facility plans to rescind the permit due to cessation of operations.
COMPLIANCE HISTORY
ON April 9, 2013, a Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement (NOV/NRE) was issued to the facility for failing to conduct the internal inspection of bagfilter CD-15B.2 within 12 months of the previous internal inspection.  Since the facility notified DAQ of this violation, DAQ did not pursue enforcement actions against the facility as noted in the enforcement memo issued May 10, 2013.

On March 11, 2013, the facility received a Notice of Violation (NOV) for submitting a semiannual report and annual compliance certification with inaccurate information.  The reports did not reflect that a deviation occurred during the first half of 2012.

On August 2, 2012, a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) was issued to the facility for a late submittal of the semiannual report.  The report was due by July 30, 2012 but was received by DAQ-WSRO on August 1, 2012.
CONCLUSION
BASED ON A REVIEW OF RECORDS AND VISUAL OBSERVATIONS, the MillerCoors, LLC appeared to be operating in compliance with Air Quality rules and regulations at the time of this inspection.


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 16 (Friday, January 24, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4229-4231]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00516]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2019-0656; FRL-10004-15-Region 7]

Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Sampling Methods for Air Pollution
Sources

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for
the State of Missouri submitted by the State on October 25, 2019. The
revisions will amend the SIP by providing a more efficient way to
perform emissions sampling on air pollution sources throughout
Missouri. The State requested approval of incorporating by reference
the federally defined methods for stack testing. These revisions are
administrative in nature and do not affect the stringency of the SIP.
The EPA's approval of this rule revision is being done in accordance
with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: This final rule is effective on February 24, 2020.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2019-0656. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan Simpson, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    On December 3, 2019, the EPA proposed in the Federal Register
approval of the SIP submission. See 84 FR 66096. The proposed revisions
would amend the SIP by providing a more efficient way to perform
emissions sampling on air pollution sources throughout Missouri. The
State requested approval of incorporating by reference the federally
defined methods for stack testing. The EPA solicited comments on the
proposed revisions to Missouri's SIP and received no comments.

II. What is being addressed in this document?

    The EPA is approving revisions to the Missouri SIP submitted by the
State of Missouri to the EPA on October 25, 2019. The revisions to the
previously federally approved Missouri State rule 10 CSR 10-6.030
Sampling Methods for Air Pollution Sources are administrative in nature
and do not affect the stringency of the SIP. The revisions will provide
a more efficient way to perform emissions sampling by incorporating by
reference federally promulgated methods.
    A detailed discussion of the revision to Missouri's SIP and was
provided in EPA's December 3, 2019, Federal Register document. See 84
FR 66096.

III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?

    The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
State provided public notice on this SIP revision from May 15, 2018 to
August 2, 2018 and received eight comments. Based on the comments
received the State made revisions to rule text in sections (21) (22)
and (23) that incorporated by reference specific appendices and
subparts. The State provided a second public notice on this SIP
revision from April 15, 2019 to June 6, 2019 and received no comments.
In addition, as explained above, the revision meets the substantive SIP
requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing
regulations.

IV. What action is the EPA taking?

    We are taking final action to approve revisions to Missouri's SIP
by approving the State's request to revise 10 CSR 10-6.030, Sampling
Methods for Air Pollution Sources.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that
includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of
1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
Missouri Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set
forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region 7 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).

    Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for
inclusion in the State Implementation Plan, have been incorporated by
reference by EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final
rulemaking of the EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference
in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by March 24, 2020. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: January 9, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart AA--Missouri

0
2. In Sec.  52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry ``10-6.030'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1320  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                        EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            State
        Missouri  citation                 Title          effective     EPA approval date        Explanation
                                                             date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control
                                      Regulations for the State of Missouri
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
10-6.030.........................  Sampling Methods for   11/30/2019  1/24/2020, [insert    ....................
                                    Air Pollution                      Federal Register
                                    Sources.                           citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-00516 Filed 1-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 81514-81515]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32576]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2010-1172; Airspace Docket No. 10-ACE-14]

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Point Lookout, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class E airspace at Point
Lookout, MO. Additional controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate
new Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAP) at M. Graham Clark-
Taney Field Airport. The FAA is taking this action to enhance the
safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at
the airport. This action also changes the airport name.

DATES: 0901 UTC. Comments must be received on or before February 11,
2011.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building

Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001. You must
identify the docket number FAA-2010-1172/Airspace Docket No. 10-ACE-14,
at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public
docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any final
disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office
(telephone 1-800-647-5527), is on the ground floor of the building at
the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone: (817) 321-
7716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2010-1172/
Airspace Docket No. 10-ACE-14.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. An
informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at
the office of the Central Service Center, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, TX 76137.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking<PHONE_NUMBER>, to
request a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    This action proposes to amend Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR), part 71 by amending Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface for SIAP operations at M. Graham Clark-Taney
Field Airport, Point Lookout, MO. Controlled airspace is needed for the
safety and management of IFR operations at the airport. The airport
name also would be changed from M. Graham Clark Airport to M. Graham
Clark-Taney Field Airport.
    Class E airspace areas are published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9U, dated August 18, 2010 and effective September 15, 2010, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designation listed in this document would be published subsequently in
the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, section 106 describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend controlled airspace at M. Graham Clark-Taney Field
Airport, Point Lookout, MO.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order
7400.9U, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 18,
2010, and effective September 15, 2010, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ACE MO E5 Point Lookout, MO [Amended]

Point Lookout, M. Graham Clark--Taney County Airport, MO
    (Lat. 36[deg]37'33'' N., long. 93[deg]13'44'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of M. Graham Clark--Taney County Airport
and within 3.1 miles each side of the 119[deg] bearing from the
airport extending from the 6.5-mile radius to 9.7 miles southeast of
the airport, and within 3.9 miles each side of the 299[deg] bearing
from the airport extending from the 6.5-mile radius to 10.6 miles
southeast of the airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX on December 15, 2010.
Walter L. Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2010-32576 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4901-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 149 (Friday, August 2, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46810-46813]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18617]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2013-0612]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Motion Picture Filming; Chicago River; Chicago, IL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing three temporary safety

zones on the Chicago River in Chicago, IL. These safety zones are
intended to restrict vessels from a portion of the Chicago River due to
the filming of a motion picture. These temporary safety zones are
necessary to protect the surrounding public and vessels from the
hazards associated with the stunt work, rigging, and other hazards
involved in the filming of a motion picture.

DATES: This rule will be enforced with actual notice from 4 a.m. on
July 21, 2013, until August 2, 2013. This rule is effective in the Code
of Federal Regulations from August 2, 2013, until 9 p.m. on August 31,
2013. This rule will be enforced intermittently from 4 a.m. to 9 p.m.
daily between July 21, 2013, and August 31, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2013-0612. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, contact or email MST1 Joseph McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan, at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Barbara Hairston,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM with respect to this rule
because doing so would be impracticable. The final details for this
event were not known to the Coast Guard until there was insufficient
time remaining before the event to publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the
effective date of this rule to wait for a comment period to run would
be impracticable because it would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to
protect spectators and vessels from the hazards associated with the
filming of a motion picture, which are discussed further below.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), The Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this temporary rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish regulated navigation areas and limited access areas: 33
U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
    From July 21, 2013, until August 31, 2013, the Coast Guard
anticipates that Rozar Pictures, LLC will film scenes for a motion
picture on the Chicago River. In late July, stunt work involving wire-
suspension is expected to be filmed at the West Lake Street Bridge on
the South Branch of the Chicago River. In August, Rozar Pictures, LLC
is expected to film the length of the Main Branch of the Chicago River
using a low-flying helicopter and/or multiple boats. Also in August,
stunts and special effects involving an inflatable boat and two
helicopters are expected to be filmed in the vicinity of the North Lake
Shore Drive Bridge on the Main Branch of the Chicago River.
    The Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, has determined that this
filming event--with associated stunts, boats, and helicopters--will
pose a significant risk to public safety and property. Such hazards
include the collision of stunt, film, and spectator vessels in a
congested area.
    Because of the possibility of bad weather on one or more of the
filming days listed above, and considering the unpredictability
involved in filming stunt work, this rule was written with a wider
range of dates and times to give the Coast Guard flexibility to
accommodate changes in the film schedule between July 21 and August 21.

 C. Discussion of the Final Rule

    With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan, has determined that three temporary safety zones are
necessary to ensure the safety of persons and vessels during the
filming of a motion picture on the Chicago River. These zones are
effective from 4 a.m. on July 21, 2013, until 9 p.m. on August 31,
2013. During this date range, these safety zones will be enforced
during the time of filming and associated stunt work, between 4 a.m. to
9 p.m. The Coast Guard anticipates that no more than one safety zone
will be enforced on a given day. The Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners to provide the public with advanced notice of those
days that these safety zones will be enforced. The Coast Guard on-scene
Captain of the Port Representative will provide actual notice on-scene.
    Three safety zones will be established as follows:
    (1) All waters of the Chicago River within a 150-yard radius of the
West Lake Street Bridge in position 41[deg]53'8.6'' N,
087[deg]38'15.9'' W (NAD 83).
    (2) All waters of the Chicago River and Lake Michigan within a 150-
yard radius of a position in the vicinity of the North Lake Shore Drive
bridge at 41[deg]53'18.8'' N, 087[deg]36'43.1'' W (NAD 83).
    (3) All waters of the Chicago River from the West Lake Street
Bridge in position 41[deg]53'8.6'' N, 087[deg]38'15.9'' W, then north
to an imaginary line connecting positions 41[deg]53'11.6'' N,
087[deg]38'20.5'' W and 41[deg]53'14.0'' N, 087[deg]38'17.2'' W, then
east along the main branch of the river to a position of 41[deg]53'19''
N, 087[deg]36'33'' W (NAD 83) in the vicinity of the North Lake Shore
Drive Bridge.
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zones is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan,
or his designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or under section 1 of
Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under those Orders. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security.
    We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy,
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel
legal or policy issues. The safety zones created by this rule will be
small and enforced during for a limited time on a limited number of
days in July and August. Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels
may still transit through the safety zones when permitted by the
Captain of the Port. Furthermore, the Coast Guard anticipates that only
one of the three safety zones will be enforced on each day.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this temporary rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending
to transit or anchor in a portion of the Chicago River during the times
in which the safety zones are enforced in July and August, 2013.
    These safety zones will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the reasons cited in the
Regulatory Planning and Review section. Additionally, before the
enforcement of these zones, we would issue local Broadcast Notice to
Mariners so vessel owners and operators can plan accordingly.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference With Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone and,
therefore it is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant

Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting this
determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are available
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0612 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T09-0612  Safety Zone; Motion picture filming; Chicago River;
Chicago, IL.

    (a) Safety Zones. The following are designated as safety zones:
    (1) All waters of the Chicago River within a 150-yard radius of the
West Lake Street Bridge in position 41[deg]53'8.6'' N,
087[deg]38'15.9'' W (NAD 83).
    (2) All waters of the Chicago River and Lake Michigan within a 150-
yard radius of a position in the vicinity of the North Lake Shore Drive
bridge at 41[deg]53'18.8'' N, 087[deg]36'43.1'' W (NAD 83).
    (3) All waters of the Chicago River from the West Lake Street
Bridge in position 41[deg]53'8.6'' N, 087[deg]38'15.9'' W, then north
to an imaginary line connecting positions 41[deg]53'11.6'' N,
087[deg]38'20.5'' W and 41[deg]53'14.0'' N, 087[deg]38'17.2'' W, then
east along the main branch of the river to a position of 41[deg]53'19''
N, 087[deg]36'33'' W (NAD 83) in the vicinity of the North Lake Shore
Drive Bridge.
    (b) Effective and Enforcement Period. These zones are effective
from July 21, 2013, until August 31, 2013. These zones will be enforced
on intermittent dates between July 21 through August 31, 2013.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within
these safety zones is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port, Lake Michigan or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) These safety zones are closed to all vessel traffic, except as
may be permitted by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or his
designated on-scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been designated by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan to
act on his behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zones shall contact the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or his on-
scene representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan or his on-scene representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate
in the safety zones must comply with all directions given to them by
the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or his on-scene representative.

    Dated: July 18, 2013.
M. W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2013-18617 Filed 8-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 136 (Wednesday, July 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41547-41548]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16738]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0013, FRL-9913-95-OW]

Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request: Title
IV of the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002: Drinking Water Security and Safety (Act)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is planning to submit an
information collection request (ICR), ``Title IV of the Public Health
Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002:
Drinking Water Security and Safety (Act) Renewal'' (EPA ICR No.
2103.05, OMB Control No. 2040-0253) to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Before doing so, EPA is
soliciting public comments on specific aspects of the proposed
information collection as described below. This is a proposed extension
of the ICR, which is currently approved through November 30, 2014. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 15, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-
2003-0013, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), or
by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Edwards, Water Security
Division, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, Mailcode: 4608T,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number: 202-
566-0055; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR.

How can I access the docket and/or submit comments?

    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0013, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Water Docket in
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), WJC West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone for the Water Docket is 202-
566-2426. Use http://www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the draft
collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once
in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified in this document.

What information is EPA particularly interested in?

    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA solicits comments
and information to enable it to:
    (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    (ii) evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden
of the

proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
    (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
    (iv) minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses affected by this collection.

What should I consider when I prepare my comments for EPA?

    You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
    1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific
examples.
    2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
    4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
    5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.
    6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified
under the DATES section.
    7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.

What information collection activity or ICR does this apply to?

    Affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
community water systems serving more than 3,300 persons.
    Title: Title IV of the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism
Preparedness and Response Act of 2002: Drinking Water Security and
Safety (Act).
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 2103.05; OMB Control No. 2040-0253.
    ICR status: This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on November
30, 2014. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal
Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and are displayed
either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate
means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if
applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: Section 1433 of the Safe Drinking Water Act, as amended
by the Bioterrorism Act requires each community water system serving a
population of more than 3,300 people to conduct a vulnerability
assessment of its water system and to prepare or revise an emergency
response plan that incorporates the results of the vulnerability
assessment. These requirements are mandatory under the statute. EPA
will continue to use the information collected under this ICR to
determine whether community water systems have conducted vulnerability
assessments and prepared or revised emergency response plans in
compliance with Section 1433. EPA is required to protect all
vulnerability assessments and all information derived from them from
disclosure to unauthorized parties and has established an Information
Protection Protocol describing how that will be accomplished.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 117.9
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 80.
    Frequency of response: Once.
    Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent: 1.
    Estimated total annual burden hours: 8,994.
    Estimated total annual costs: $77,252. This includes an estimated
burden cost of $1,035/respondent and an estimated cost of $16,849 for
capital and maintenance/operational costs.

Are there changes in the estimates from the last approval?

    There is no decrease in the total estimated respondent burden
compared with that identified in the ICR currently approved by OMB.
This reflects EPA's continued need to collect documents that were
included in the original estimate, but still have not been submitted to
the Agency.

What is the next step in the process for this ICR?

    EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. At that time, EPA will
issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you have any
questions about this ICR or the approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

    Dated: July 7, 2014.
Peter C. Gravatt,
Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.
[FR Doc. 2014-16738 Filed 7-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 132 (Thursday, July 9, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 41233]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14420]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ Docket No. CP20-27-000]

North Baja Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Revised Schedule for
Environmental Review of the North Baja Xpress Project

    This notice identifies the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
staff's revised schedule for the completion of the environmental
assessment (EA) for North Baja Pipeline, LLC's (North Baja) North Baja
XPress Project. The first notice of schedule, issued on February 14,
2020, identified July 17, 2020 as the EA issuance date. However, the
schedule has been extended in order to accommodate the U.S. Bureau of
Land Management's (BLM) review of North Baja's Plan of Development for
the project, which North Baja has not yet provided but states it will
file with the BLM in early July. The BLM is a cooperating agency in the
development of the EA. As a result, staff has revised the schedule for
issuance of the EA.

Schedule for Environmental Review

Issuance of the EA--September 8, 2020
90-day Federal Authorization Decision Deadline--December 7, 2020

    If a schedule change becomes necessary, an additional notice will
be provided so that the relevant agencies are kept informed of the
project's progress.

Additional Information

    In order to receive notification of the issuance of the EA and to
keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in specific dockets,
the Commission offers a free service called eSubscription. This can
reduce the amount of time you spend researching proceedings by
automatically providing you with notification of these filings,
document summaries, and direct links to the documents. Go to https://www.ferc.gov/ferc-online/overview to register for eSubscription.
    Comments may be filed electronically via the internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii). Additional information about the Project is
available from the Commission's Office of External Affairs at (866)
208-FERC or on the FERC website (www.ferc.gov). Using the https://elibrary.ferc.gov/IDMWS/search/fercgensearch.asp eLibrary link, enter
the Docket Number excluding the last three digits (i.e., CP20-27),
select a date range, and follow the instructions. For assistance with
access to eLibrary, the helpline can be reached at<PHONE_NUMBER>, TTY
(202) 502-8659, or at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The eLibrary link on
the FERC website also provides access to the texts of formal documents
issued by the Commission, such as orders, notices, and rule makings.

    Dated: June 29, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-14420 Filed 7-8-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P