[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 208 (Friday, October 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 65438]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26503]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

MedLink International, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

October 24, 2012.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
MedLink International, Inc. (``MedLink''). Questions have arisen
concerning the accuracy of publicly disseminated information concerning
the company's public filings and financial statements. MedLink's
securities are quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC Markets Group Inc.
under the ticker symbol MLKNA.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the
above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on
October 24, 2012, through 11:59 p.m. EST on November 6, 2012.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-26503 Filed 10-24-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 125 (Friday, June 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29968-29970]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13708]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81023; File No. SR-GEMX-2017-25]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the
Non-Priority Customer License Surcharge

June 26, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 12, 2017, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``GEMX'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to apply the Non-Priority Customer license
surcharge set forth in Section I of the Schedule of Fees to orders that
are routed to away markets.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to apply the Non-
Priority Customer (i.e., Market Maker,\3\ Non-Nasdaq GEMX Market
Maker,\4\ Firm Proprietary \5\/Broker-Dealer,\6\ and Professional
Customer \7\) license surcharge set forth in Section I of the Schedule
of Fees to NDX \8\ orders that are routed to one or more exchanges in
connection with the Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market
Plan (the ``Plan''). The Exchange initially filed the proposed pricing
changes on June 1, 2017 (SR-GEMX-2017-22). On June 12, 2017, the
Exchange withdrew that filing and submitted this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The term ``Market Makers'' refers to ``Competitive Market
Makers'' and ``Primary Market Makers'' collectively. See Rule
100(a)(25).
    \4\ A ``Non-Nasdaq GEMX Market Maker'' is a market maker as
defined in Section 3(a)(38) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, registered in the same options class on another options
exchange.
    \5\ A ``Firm Proprietary'' order is an order submitted by a
member for its own proprietary account.
    \6\ A ``Broker-Dealer'' order is an order submitted by a member
for a broker-dealer account that is not its own proprietary account.
    \7\ A ``Professional Customer'' is a person or entity that is
not a broker/dealer and is not a Priority Customer. A ``Priority
Customer'' is a person or entity that is not a broker/dealer in
securities, and does not place more than 390 orders in listed
options per day on average during a calendar month for its own
beneficial account(s), as defined in Nasdaq GEMX Rule 100(a)(37A).
    \8\ NDX represents options on the Nasdaq-100 Index traded under
the symbol NDX (``NDX'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Today, the Exchange charges Non-Priority Customers route-out fees
for orders in Non-Penny Symbols \9\ that are routed to away markets in
connection with the Plan. Specifically as set forth in Section II.A of
the Schedule of Fees, Non-Priority Customer orders pay a route-out fee
of $0.95 per contract in Non-Penny Symbols. The route-out fees offset
costs incurred by the Exchange in connection with using unaffiliated
broker-dealers to access other exchanges for linkage executions. Also
as set forth in Section I of the Schedule of Fees, the Exchange
presently charges a $0.25 license surcharge for all Non-Priority
Customer orders in NDX (``NDX Surcharge''). The NDX Surcharge currently
applies to all NDX orders executed on the Exchange, but is not applied
when those orders are routed to away markets in connection with the
Plan. The Exchange therefore proposes to apply the NDX Surcharge to
such orders by adding language in note 9 of Section I of the Schedule
of Fees to state that the NDX Surcharge applies to all NDX executions,
including executions of NDX orders that are routed to one or more
exchanges in connection with the Plan. As such, all Non-Priority
Customer orders in NDX that are routed to away markets would be
assessed a $0.25 per contract NDX Surcharge and a $0.95 per contract
route-out fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ ``Non-Penny Symbols'' are options overlying all symbols that
are not in the Penny Pilot Program. NDX is a Non-Penny Symbol.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\10\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any
facility, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005),
70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Likewise, in NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission
\13\ (``NetCoalition'') the D.C. Circuit upheld

the Commission's use of a market-based approach in evaluating the
fairness of market data fees against a challenge claiming that Congress
mandated a cost-based approach.\14\ As the court emphasized, the
Commission ``intended in Regulation NMS that `market forces, rather
than regulatory requirements' play a role in determining the market
data . . . to be made available to investors and at what cost.'' \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
    \14\ See NetCoalition, at 534-535.
    \15\ Id. at 537.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is
`fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers'. . . .'' \16\ Although the court and
the SEC were discussing the cash equities markets, the Exchange
believes that these views apply with equal force to the options
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ Id. at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No.
59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008)
(SR-NYSEArca-2006-21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that its proposal to apply the NDX Surcharge
to Non-Priority Customer orders in NDX that are routed to away markets
in connection with the Plan is reasonable and equitable because it
offsets both the costs associated with executing orders on away markets
as well as the licensing costs associated with listing and trading NDX.
The Exchange's route-out fees are presently not calculated to cover the
licensing costs for NDX. The Exchange notes that a license agreement is
required to trade NDX regardless of whether the NDX order is executed
on the Exchange or routed to another exchange in connection with the
Plan. As such, the Exchange believes that extending the NDX Surcharge
to NDX orders routed to away markets (in addition to those orders
executed on the Exchange) is a reasonable and equitable means of
recovering the costs of the license. Furthermore, the Exchange must pay
the actual transaction fees charged by the exchange the NDX order is
routed to, which includes the license surcharge that such exchange
assesses for NDX orders. The Exchange's route-out fees are currently
not calculated to cover these license surcharges assessed by other
exchanges and therefore seeks to recover these costs under this
proposal. For example, an NDX order that is routed to the Chicago Board
Options Exchange (``CBOE'') in connection with the Plan would be
assessed a $0.25 license surcharge by CBOE on top of the actual
transaction fees CBOE would charge for the NDX order.\17\ The
Exchange's route-out fees are presently assessed as fixed fees, unlike
other exchanges, which, in addition to a fixed route-out fee, assess
the actual transaction fees charged by the exchange the order is routed
to.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See CBOE's fee schedule, at: https://www.cboe.com/publish/feeschedule/CBOEFeeSchedule.pdf.
    \18\ See, e.g., MIAX Options Fee Schedule, (1) Transaction Fees,
(c) Fees and Rebates for Customer Orders Routed to Another Options
Exchange, at: https://www.miaxoptions.com/sites/default/files/page-files/MIAX_Options_Fee_Schedule_05012017.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that its proposal is reasonable and
equitable because Non-Priority Customers would be able to avoid paying
the NDX Surcharge by sending the Exchange NDX orders to be routed to
another market and only pay the Exchange's route-out fee. The Exchange
would, however, still be required to pay all of the actual transaction
fees (including the license surcharge) charged by the exchange the
order is routed to. For example, a Non-Priority Customer order in NDX
that is routed to CBOE today would only be assessed the $0.95 per
contract route-out fee while the Exchange would pay the $0.25 per
contract license surcharge on top of the actual transaction fees CBOE
would charge for the NDX order. The Exchange therefore believes that it
is reasonable and equitable to assess the NDX Surcharge to NDX orders
that are routed to other exchanges in order to avoid this scenario.
    Finally, the Exchange believes that the proposed fee change is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange will
apply the same fee to all similarly situated members. In particular,
the NDX Surcharge would be applied to all Non-Priority Customer orders
routed to away markets in connection with the Plan. The Exchange
believes it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to assess this
surcharge on all participants other than Priority Customers because the
Exchange seeks to encourage Priority Customer order flow and the
liquidity such order flow brings to the marketplace, which in turn
benefits all market participants.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at
other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own fees in
response, and because market participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which
fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is
extremely limited.
    In this instance, the proposed application of the NDX Surcharge to
NDX orders that are routed to one or more exchanges in connection with
the Plan does not impose a burden on competition because the Exchange's
execution services are completely voluntary and subject to extensive
competition from other exchanges. If the changes proposed herein are
unattractive to market participants, it is likely that the Exchange
will lose market share as a result. Accordingly, the Exchange does not
believe that its proposal will impair the ability of members to
maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\19\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \20\ thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or
appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of
investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-GEMX-2017-25 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-GEMX-2017-25. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-GEMX-2017-25 and should be
submitted on or before July 21, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-13708 Filed 6-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21117-21120]
[FR Doc No: 2023-07397]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2023-0666; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-00555-Q]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Survitec Group Limited (RFD Beaufort
Ltd.) Life Jackets

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Survitec Group Limited (RFD Beaufort Ltd.) Type 102 Mk 3,
102 Mk 4, and 105 Mk 1 life jackets. This proposed AD was prompted by a
report that some life jackets were found packed in the wrong valise
(container). This proposed AD would require an inspection for a
discrepancy (mismatch of the valise/container description and life
jacket type) of life jackets and, if necessary, replacement of the life
jacket. This proposed AD would also limit the installation of affected
parts under certain conditions. The FAA is proposing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 25,
2023.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2023-0666; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this NPRM, the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
     For service information identified in this NPRM, contact
Survitec Group Limited, t/a RFD Beaufort Ltd, Kingsway, Dunmurry,
Belfast BT17 9AF, United Kingdom; telephone +44 2890 301531; fax +44
2890 621765; email survitecgroup.com">[email protected]survitecgroup.com; website
survitecgroup.com.
     You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Kung, Aerospace Engineer,
Aviation Safety Section AIR-7B1, Boston ACO Branch, FAA, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2023-0666; Project Identifier
MCAI-2022-00555-Q'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
the proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Kevin
Kung, Aerospace Engineer, Aviation Safety Section AIR-7B1, Boston ACO
Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; telephone 781-
238-7244; email [email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA
receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in
the public docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), which is the aviation authority
for the United Kingdom (U.K.), has issued U.K. CAA AD G-2022-0009,
dated April 21, 2022 (U.K. CAA AD G-2022-0009) (also referred to after
this as the MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition on certain Survitec
Group Limited (RFD Beaufort Ltd.) Type 102 Mk 3, 102 Mk 4, and 105 Mk 1
life jackets. The MCAI states Type 102 Mk 3 and Type 102 Mk 4 life
jackets are designed for use by an adult or child. Type 105 Mk 1 life
jackets are designed for use by an infant. Each is packed in a clear
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) valise, which is marked ADULT/CHILD, CREW, or
INFANT. Due to differences in parameters such as neck aperture and
buoyancy, an infant life jacket cannot be used by an adult or child;
likewise, an adult/child life jacket cannot be used by an infant. The
MCAI stated that Survitec has found that some life jackets were packed
in the wrong valise. This could cause incorrect life jackets to be
provided for passengers onboard an aircraft.
    The FAA is proposing this AD to address incorrectly labeled life
jackets, which could, in the event of a water landing or evacuation,
result in the unavailability of a life jacket with correct flotation,
and possible drowning.
    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2023-0666.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Survitec [RFD] Alert Service Bulletin 25-207-A,
Version 1, dated November 24, 2021. This service information specifies
procedures for a general visual inspection for a discrepancy (mismatch
of valise/container description and life jacket type) of affected life
jackets, reporting of all inspection results to Survitec, and if a
discrepancy is found, replacement of affected life jackets. (This
service information is identified throughout as ``Survitec,'' while
``RFD'' is identified on only the first page of the document. Although
both ``Survitec'' and ``RFD'' are current company names, the service
information applies to RFD life jackets.) This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority,
it has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
and service information described above. The FAA is issuing this NPRM
after determining that the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information already described. This proposed AD would
also limit the installation of affected parts under certain conditions.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 4 life jackets installed on, but not limited to, aircraft of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                  Labor cost                              Parts cost                product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85.............  None...........................             $85             $340
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition action that would be required based on the results of any
required actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need this on-condition action:

                 Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Cost per
              Labor cost                   Parts cost        product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85......             $55             $140
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate.
According to the manufacturer, however, some or all of the costs of
this proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected operators.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public
reporting for this collection of information is estimated to take
approximately 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Send comments regarding this burden estimate
or any other aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden, to Information Collection
Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

Survitec Group Limited (RFD Beaufort Ltd): Docket No. FAA-2023-0666;
Project Identifier MCAI-2022-00555-Q.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by May 25, 2023.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

 (c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Survitec Group Limited (RFD Beaufort Ltd.)
life jackets identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this AD,
having a part number and serial number identified in tables 2
through 13 of Survitec [RFD] Alert Service Bulletin 25-207-A,
Version 1, dated November 24, 2021, and a date of manufacture
between October 1, 2018, and April 30, 2019, inclusive.
    Note 1 to the introductory text of paragraph (c): This alert
service bulletin is identified throughout as ``Survitec,'' while
``RFD'' is identified on only the first page of the document.
Although both ``Survitec'' and ``RFD'' are current company names,
the alert service bulletin applies to RFD life jackets.
    (1) Type 102 Mk 3 and 102 Mk 4 life jackets, approved under
European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Technical Standard
Order Authorization EASA.21O.799.
    (2) Type 105 Mk 1 life jackets, approved under United Kingdom
Civil Aviation Authority (U.K. CAA) Aircraft Equipment Approval
(AEAR) E15841.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25, Equipment/
Furnishings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report that some life jackets were
found packed in the wrong valise (container). The FAA is issuing
this AD to address incorrectly labeled life jackets. The unsafe
condition, if not addressed, and combined with a water landing or
evacuation, could result in inability to use a life jacket with
correct flotation and possible drowning.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspection

    Within 4 months after the effective date of this AD, do a
general visual inspection for a discrepancy (mismatch of the valise/
container description and life jacket type) of the life jacket, in
accordance with paragraphs 2.A. through 2.C. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Survitec [RFD] Alert Service Bulletin 25-207-A,
Version 1, dated November 24, 2021.

(h) Follow-on and Corrective Action

    Before further flight after accomplishing the requirements of
paragraph (g) of this AD, do the applicable actions required by
paragraph (h)(1) and (2) of this AD.
    (1) If no discrepancies are found during the inspection required
by paragraph (g) of this AD, re-identify that part in accordance
with paragraph 2.D.(1) of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Survitec [RFD] Alert Service Bulletin 25-207-A, Version 1, dated
November 24, 2021.
    (2) If any discrepancy is found during the inspection required
by paragraph (g) of this

AD, do the actions required by paragraphs (h)(2)(i) and (ii) of this
AD.
    (i) Record the unserviceable part in accordance with paragraph
2.E.(1) of the Accomplishment Instructions of Survitec [RFD] Alert
Service Bulletin 25-207-A, Version 1, dated November 24, 2021.
    (ii) Replace the discrepant part with a new or serviceable part,
in accordance with paragraph 2.E.(2) of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Survitec [RFD] Alert Service Bulletin 25-207-A,
Version 1, dated November 24, 2021.

(i) Parts Installation Limitation

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
life jacket identified in paragraph (c) of this AD on any airplane,
unless the life jacket and its valise/container have been inspected,
and re-identified or replaced as applicable, in accordance with the
requirements of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.

 (j) Reporting Requirement

    At the applicable time specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (2) of
this AD, submit a report of the inspection results to Survitec, in
accordance with paragraph 2.F. of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Survitec [RFD] Alert Service Bulletin 25-207-A, Version 1, dated
November 24, 2021.
    (1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
    (2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD.

(k) Special Flight Permits

    Special flight permits, as described in 14 CFR 21.197 and
21.199, are not allowed.

(l) Additional AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Boston ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If
sending information directly to the manager, Boston ACO Branch, mail
it to the address identified in paragraph (m)(2) of this AD or email
to: [email protected]. If mailing information, also submit
information by email. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Boston ACO
Branch, FAA; or the United Kingdom Civil Aviation Authority (U.K.
CAA); or Survitec Group Limited's U.K. CAA's Alternative Procedure
for Design Organization Approval (ADOA). If approved by the ADOA,
the approval must include the ADOA-authorized signature.

(m) Additional Information

    (1) Refer to U.K. CAA AD G-2022-0009, dated April 21, 2022, for
related information. This U.K. CAA AD may be found in the AD docket
at  regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2023-0666.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Kevin Kung,
Aerospace Engineer, Aviation Safety Section AIR-7B1, Boston ACO
Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; telephone
781-238-7244; email [email protected].

(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Survitec [RFD] Alert Service Bulletin 25-207-A, Version 1,
dated November 24, 2021.
    Note 2 to paragraph (n)(2)(i): This alert service bulletin is
identified throughout as ``Survitec,'' while ``RFD'' is identified
on only the first page of the document. Although both ``Survitec''
and ``RFD'' are current company names, the alert service bulletin
applies to RFD life jackets.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Survitec Group Limited, Kingsway, Dunmurry, Belfast BT17 9AF, United
Kingdom; phone: +44 2890 301531, fax: +44 2890 621765; email:
survitecgroup.com">[email protected]survitecgroup.com; website survitecgroup.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email [email protected], or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on April 4, 2023.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-07397 Filed 4-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


3344 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 15 / Friday, January 23, 2004 / Notices II. Background A. What Action is the Agency Taking?

EPA is making available risk assessments that have been developed as part of the Agency's public participation process for making reregistration eligibility and tolerance reassessment decisions for the organophosphate and other pesticides consistent with FFDCA, as amended by FQPA. The Agency's human health risk assessment and other related documents for oryzalin are available in the individual pesticide docket. As additional comments, reviews, and risk assessment modifications become available, these will also be docketed for oryzalin. The Agency cautions that the oryzalin risk assessment is preliminary and that further refinements may be appropriate. These documents reflect only the work and analysis conducted as of the time they were produced and it is appropriate that, as new information becomes available and/ or additional analyses are performed, the conclusions they contain may change. EPA is providing an opportunity, through this notice, for interested parties to provide written comments and input to the Agency on the risk assessment for the pesticide specified in this notice. Such comments and input could address, for example, the availability of additional data to further refine the risk assessment, such as percent crop treated information or submission of residue data from food processing studies, or could address the Agency's risk assessment methodologies and assumptions as applied to this specific chemical. Comments should be limited to issues raised within the risk assessment and associated documents. EPA will provide other opportunities for public comment on other science issues associated with the pesticide tolerance reassessment program. Failure to comment on any such issues as part of this opportunity will in no way prejudice or limit a commenter's opportunity to participate fully in later notice and comment processes. All comments should be submitted by [ insert date 60 days after date of publication in theFederal Register] using the methods in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Comments will become part of the Agency record for oryzalin.

List of Subjects Environmental protection, Chemicals, Pesticides and pests. Dated: January 16, 2004. Peter Caulkins, Acting Director, Special Review and Reregistration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. [ FR Doc. 04   1450 Filed   1   22   04; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ OPPT   2004   0004]; FRL   7342   8]

Certain New Chemicals; Receipt and Status Information AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Section 5 of the Toxic Substances Control Act ( TSCA) requires any person who intends to manufacture ( defined by statute to include import) a new chemical ( i. e., a chemical not on the TSCA Inventory) to notify EPA and comply with the statutory provisions pertaining to the manufacture of new chemicals. Under sections 5( d)( 2) and 5( d)( 3) of TSC, EPA is required to publish a notice of receipt of a premanufacture notice ( PMN) or an application for a test marketing exemption ( TME), and to publish periodic status reports on the chemicals under review and the receipt of notices of commencement to manufacture those chemicals. This status report, which covers the period from December 1, 2003 to December 24, 2003, consists of the PMNs pending or expired, and the notices of commencement to manufacture a new chemical that the Agency has received under TSCA section 5 during this time period. DATES: Comments identified by the docket ID number OPPT   2003   0004 and the specific PMN number or TME number, must be received on or before February 23, 2004. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/ courier. Follow the detailed instructions as provided in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Cunningham, Director, Environmental Assistance Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics ( 7408M), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001; telephone number: ( 202) 554   1404; e mail address: TSCAHotline epa. gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me? This action is directed to the public in general. As such, the Agency has not attempted to describe the specific entities that this action may apply to. Although others may be affected, this action applies directly to the submitter of the premanufacture notices addressed in the action. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information? 1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this action under docket identification ( ID) number OPPT   2003   0004. The official public docket consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other information related to this action. Although a part of the official docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business Information ( CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public docket is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at the EPA Docket Center, Rm. B102 Reading Room, EPA West, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4: 30 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The EPA Docket Center Reading Room telephone number is ( 202) 566   1744 and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket, which is located in EPA Docket Center, is ( 202) 566   0280. 2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the `` Federal Register'' listings at http:// www. epa. gov/ fedrgstr/. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket/ to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I. B. 1. Once in the system, select `` search,'' then key in the appropriate docket ID number. Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA Dockets.

VerDate jul< 14> 2003 16: 30 Jan 22, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 23JAN1. SGM 23JAN1 3345 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 15 / Friday, January 23, 2004 / Notices Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute, which is not included in the official public docket, will not be available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will not be placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in printed, paper form in the official public docket. To the extent feasible, publicly available docket materials will be made available in EPA's electronic public docket. When a document is selected from the index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify whether the document is available for viewing in EPA's electronic public docket. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I. B. 1. EPA intends to work towards providing electronic access to all of the publicly available docket materials through EPA's electronic public docket. For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket. Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public docket. Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public docket. Where practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph will be placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with a brief description written by the docket staff.

C. How and To Whom Do I Submit Comments? You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/ courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate docket ID number and specific PMN number or TME number in the subject line on the first page of your comment. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked `` late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late comments. If you wish to submit CBI or information that is otherwise protected by statute, please follow the instructions in Unit I. D. Do not use EPA Dockets or e mail to submit CBI or information protected by statute. 1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as prescribed in this unit, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other contact information in the body of your comment. Also include this contact information on the outside of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further information on the substance of your comment. EPA's policy is that EPA will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket/, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once in the system, select `` search,'' and then key in docket ID number OPPT   2003   0004. The system is an `` anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity, e mail address, or other contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. ii. E mail. Comments may be sent by e mail to oppt. ncic@ epa. gov, Attention: Docket ID Number OPPT   2003   0004 and PMN Number or TME Number. In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e mail system is not an `` anonymous access'' system. If you send an e mail comment directly to the docket without going through EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e mail system automatically captures your email address. E mail addresses that are automatically captured by EPA's e mail system are included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM that you mail to the mailing address identified in Unit I. C. 2. These electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect or ASCII file format. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption. 2. By mail. Send your comments to: Document Control Office ( 7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics ( OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001. 3. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver your comments to: OPPT Document Control Office ( DCO) in EPA East Bldg., Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. Attention: Docket ID Number OPPT   2003   0004 and PMN Number or TME Number. The DCO is open from 8 a. m. to 4 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the DCO is ( 202) 564   8930.

D. How Should I Submit CBI to the Agency?

Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI electronically through EPA's electronic public docket or by e mail. You may claim information that you submit to EPA as CBI by marking any part or all of that information as CBI ( if you submit CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that is CBI). Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes any information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket and EPA's electronic public docket. If you submit the copy that does not contain CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM clearly that it does not contain CBI. Information not marked as CBI will be included in the public docket and EPA's electronic public docket without prior notice. If you have any questions about CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI, please consult the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

VerDate jul< 14> 2003 16: 30 Jan 22, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 23JAN1. SGM 23JAN1 3346 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 15 / Friday, January 23, 2004 / Notices E. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your comments: 1. Explain your views as clearly as possible. 2. Describe any assumptions that you used. 3. Provide copies of any technical information and/ or data you used that support your views. 4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you arrived at the estimate that you provide. 5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns. 6. Offer alternative ways to improve the notice or collection activity. 7. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline in this document. 8. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket ID number assigned to this action and the specific PMN number you are commenting on in the subject line on the first page of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal Register citation.

II. Why is EPA Taking this Action?

Section 5 of TSCA requires any person who intends to manufacture ( defined by statute to include import) a new chemical ( i. e., a chemical not on the TSCA Inventory to notify EPA and comply with the statutory provisions pertaining to the manufacture of new chemicals. Under sections 5( d)( 2) and 5( d)( 3) of TSCA, EPA is required to publish a notice of receipt of a PMN or an application for a TME and to publish periodic status reports on the chemicals under review and the receipt of notices of commencement to manufacture those chemicals. This status report, which covers the period from December 1, 2003 to December 24, 2003, consists of the PMNs pending or expired, and the notices of commencement to manufacture a new chemical that the Agency has received under TSCA section 5 during this time period.

III. Receipt and Status Report for PMNs This status report identifies the PMNs pending or expired, and the notices of commencement to manufacture a new chemical that the Agency has received under TSCA section 5 during this time period. If you are interested in information that is not included in the following tables, you may contact EPA as described in Unit II. to access additional non CBI information that may be available. In Table I of this unit, EPA provides the following information ( to the extent that such information is not claimed as CBI) on the PMNs received by EPA during this period: the EPA case number assigned to the PMN; the date the PMN was received by EPA; the projected end date for EPA's review of the PMN; the submitting manufacturer; the potential uses identified by the manufacturer in the PMN; and the chemical identity.

I. 50 PREMANUFACTURE NOTICES RECEIVED FROM: 12/ 01/ 03 TO 12/ 24/ 03 Case No. Received Date Projected Notice End Date Manufacturer/ Importer Use Chemical P   04   0153 12/ 01/ 03 02/ 28/ 04 CBI ( G) Phosphor ( G) Rare earth phosphate P   04   0154 12/ 01/ 03 02/ 28/ 04 NA Industries, Inc. ( S) A binder resin for plastics coating ( G) 2 propenoic acid, 2 methyl, polymer with 2 hydroxypropyl 2 propenoate, 2 propenenitrile, alkyl 2 methyl 2 propenoate and 1 propene, homopolymer, chlorinated P   04   0156 12/ 03/ 03 03/ 01/ 04 CBI ( G) Contained use ( G) Cobalt catalyst P   04   0157 12/ 03/ 03 03/ 01/ 04 CBI ( S) A monomer for the production of specialty polymers; export ( G) Diaryl carbonate P   04   0159 12/ 04/ 03 03/ 02/ 04 CBI ( G) By product ( S) Phosphonoacetic acid P   04   0160 12/ 04/ 03 03/ 02/ 04 Biolab, Inc. ( S) Scale/ corrosion control agent for cooling water systems ( G) Derivative of acrylic acid copolymer P   04   0161 12/ 05/ 03 03/ 03/ 04 Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ( G) Lubricant additive ( S) Phosphonic acid, di C12   14 alkyl esters P   04   0162 12/ 05/ 03 03/ 03/ 04 CBI ( G) Processing acid ( G) Salt of a copolymer of acrylic acid and acrylic acid derivatives P   04   0163 12/ 05/ 03 03/ 03/ 04 CBI ( G) open, non dispersive use ( G) Amine prepolymer P   04   0164 12/ 05/ 03 03/ 03/ 04 CBI ( G) Manufacturing of protective devices ( G) Urethane polymer P   04   0165 12/ 04/ 03 03/ 02/ 04 CBI ( G) Additive flame retardant resin component for molding electrical and automotive electronics parts ( S) Phenol, 4,4 ( 1 methylethylidene) bis[ 2,6 dibromo, polymer with ( chloromethyl) oxirane, 2,4,6 tribromophenyl ethers P   04   0166 12/ 08/ 03 03/ 06/ 04 CBI ( S) Crosslinker for polyurethane dispersions crosslinker for acrylic latexes ( G) Carbodiimide crosslinker, polycarbodiimde crosslinker P   04   0167 12/ 09/ 03 03/ 07/ 04 Meadwestvaco Corporation  Specialty Chemicals Division ( S) Asphalt emulsifier salt ( G) Amides, from aliphatic and cycloaliphatic acids, polyamines, hydrochlorides P   04   0168 12/ 09/ 03 03/ 07/ 04 Meadwestvaco Corporation  Specialty Chemicals Division ( S) Asphalt emulsifier salt ( G) Amides, from oil based fatty acids, polyamines, hydrochlorides P   04   0169 12/ 09/ 03 03/ 07/ 04 Meadwestvaco Corporation  Specialty Chemicals Division ( S) Asphalt emulsifier salt ( G) Amides, from glycerides, polyamines, hydrochlorides P   04   0170 12/ 09/ 03 03/ 07/ 04 Meadwestvaco Corporation  Specialty Chemicals Division ( S) Asphalt emulsifier salt ( G) Amides, from fatty acids, polyamines, hydrochlorides VerDate jul< 14> 2003 16: 30 Jan 22, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 23JAN1. SGM 23JAN1 3347 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 15 / Friday, January 23, 2004 / Notices I. 50 PREMANUFACTURE NOTICES RECEIVED FROM: 12/ 01/ 03 TO 12/ 24/ 03   Continued Case No. Received Date Projected Notice End Date Manufacturer/ Importer Use Chemical P   04   0171 12/ 09/ 03 03/ 07/ 04 Meadwestvaco Corporation  Specialty Chemicals Division ( S) Asphalt emulsifier salt ( G) Amides, from plant drived fatty acids, polyamines, hydrochlorides P   04   0172 12/ 09/ 03 03/ 07/ 04 CIBA Specialty Chemicals Corporation ( S) Oxidative catalyst for use in multipurpose stain removers ( G) Organo manganese complex P   04   0173 12/ 10/ 03 03/ 08/ 04 CBI ( G) Additive in radiation cured coatings adhesives and inks. ( G) Metallic acrylate P   04   0174 12/ 10/ 03 03/ 08/ 04 3M ( G) Protective coating ( G) Fluoroacrylate modified urethane P   04   0175 12/ 11/ 03 03/ 09/ 04 CBI ( G) Surfactant/ wetting agent ( G) Alkyl alkoxylate P   04   0176 12/ 11/ 03 03/ 09/ 04 3M ( S) Chemical intermediate ( G) Fluorinated oligomer alcohol P   04   0177 12/ 11/ 03 03/ 09/ 04 Dynea USA ( S) Adhesive for wood products ( G) Melamine resin P   04   0178 12/ 12/ 03 03/ 10/ 04 CBI ( G) Radiation cured coatings and inks ( G) Polyester acrylate P   04   0179 12/ 15/ 03 03/ 13/ 04 CBI ( S) Urethane foam catalyst ( G) Tertiary amine carboxylic acid compound P   04   0180 12/ 15/ 03 03/ 13/ 04 CBI ( G) An open non dispersive use ( G) Rosin modified phenolic resin P   04   0181 12/ 16/ 03 03/ 14/ 04 CBI ( G) Additive for electrical insulating coatings ( G) Phenolic resin P   04   0182 12/ 16/ 03 03/ 14/ 04 CBI ( G) Water reducer in concrete ( G) Polyglycolether polycarboxylate P   04   0183 12/ 17/ 03 03/ 15/ 04 Eastman Kodak Company ( G) Chemical intermediate, destructive use ( G) Heterocyclic substituted nitrobenzenecarboxamide P   04   0184 12/ 17/ 03 03/ 15/ 04 Croda Inc. ( S) Irritancy mitigator for household and industrial specialty products; solubilizer for semi polar and nonpolar compounds into polar media; skin emollient for household and industrial specialty products; pigment wetting agent and dispersant for coatings ( S) Oxirane, methyl, polymer with oxirane, hexanedioate ( 2: 1), ditetradecyl ether P   04   0185 12/ 18/ 03 03/ 16/ 04 CBI ( G) Polymeric admixture for cements ( open, non dispersive use) ( G) Sulfonated ketone resin P   04   0186 12/ 17/ 03 03/ 15/ 04 CBI ( G) Thermal transfer ink ribbon ( S) 2 propenoic acid, 2 methyl, 1,1 dimethylethyl ester, polymer with ethenylbenzene, 2 hydroxyethyl 2 methyl 2 propenoate and methyl 2 methyl 2 propenoate, 2,2  azobis[ 2 methylpropanenitrile] initiated P   04   0187 12/ 18/ 03 03/ 16/ 04 CBI ( G) Packaging and bottle application ( G) Modified polyester P   04   0188 12/ 19/ 03 03/ 17/ 04 Eastman Kodak Company ( G) Chemical intermediate, destructive use ( G) Heterocyclic substituted sulfonyloxybenzenecarboxamide P   04   0189 12/ 19/ 03 03/ 17/ 04 Eastman Kodak Company ( G) Chemical intermediate, destructive use ( G) Alkyl substituted acid chloride P   04   0190 12/ 22/ 03 03/ 20/ 04 CBI ( S) Inks; coatings ( G) Polyester acrylate P   04   0191 12/ 22/ 03 03/ 20/ 04 CBI ( S) Automotive industry ( G) Cycloaliphaticdiisocyanate, homopolymer, compound with alkanedioic acid ester P   04   0192 12/ 22/ 03 03/ 20/ 04 CBI ( G) Ingredients for use in consumer products: highly dispersive ( G) Alkylthioalkane P   04   0193 12/ 22/ 03 03/ 20/ 04 CBI ( G) Chemical intermediate ( S) Hydroxylamine, 0[( 2e) 3 chloro 2 propenyl] P   04   0194 12/ 22/ 03 03/ 20/ 04 CBI ( G) Highly dispersive use ( G) Dioxacycloheptanone P   04   0195 12/ 23/ 03 03/ 21/ 04 Lonza Inc. ( G) As a polymer aid processing ( G) Alkyldimethylbenzylammonium alkylsulfate P   04   0196 12/ 23/ 03 03/ 21/ 04 CBI ( G) Wear resistant additive ( G) Silane reaction products with alumina P   04   0197 12/ 23/ 03 03/ 21/ 04 CBI ( G) Industrial structural materials ( G) Telechelic polyacrylates P   04   0198 12/ 23/ 03 03/ 21/ 04 CBI ( G) Industrial structural materials ( G) Telechelic polyacrylates P   04   0199 12/ 23/ 03 03/ 21/ 04 Cht r. Beitlich Corporation ( S) Hydrophilic silicone softner for textile finishing; hair conditioning agent ( S) Siloxanes and silcones, 3[ 3 ( C12   16 aklyldimethylammonio) 2 hydroxypropoxy] propyl me, di me, [[[ 3[ 3( C12   16 aklyldimethtylammnonio) 2 hydroxy propyl] dimethylsilyl] oxy] terminated acetates ( salts)

VerDate jul< 14> 2003 16: 30 Jan 22, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 23JAN1. SGM 23JAN1 3348 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 15 / Friday, January 23, 2004 / Notices I. 50 PREMANUFACTURE NOTICES RECEIVED FROM: 12/ 01/ 03 TO 12/ 24/ 03   Continued Case No. Received Date Projected Notice End Date Manufacturer/ Importer Use Chemical P   04   0200 12/ 23/ 03 03/ 21/ 04 Cht r. Beitlich Corporation ( S) Hydrophilic silicone softner for textile finishing; hair conditioning agent ( S) Siloxanes and silicones, 3[ 3[[ 3 ( coco acylamino propyl] dimethylammonio] 2 hydroxyproxy] propyl me, 3( 2,3 dihydroxypropy) propyl me. di me, mixed[[[ 3[ 3[[ 3( coco acylamino propyl] dimethylammonio] 2 hydroxypropyl] propyl] dimethylsilyl] oxy] and [[[ 3( 2,3

dihydroxypropxy propyl] dimethylsilyl] oxy] terminated acetates ( salts) P   04   0201 12/ 23/ 03 03/ 21/ 04 CBI ( G) Destructive use for resins. ( G) Substituted norbornene P   04   0202 12/ 24/ 03 03/ 22/ 04 CBI ( G) Resin for protective inductrial coating ( G) Water based acrylic dispersion P   04   0203 12/ 24/ 03 03/ 22/ 04 Reichhold, Inc. ( G) Polyester base resin ( G) Alkanediols, polymer with carboxylic acid anhydrides, reacted with branched alcohol and carboxylic acid. P   04   0235 12/ 22/ 03 03/ 20/ 04 ConocoPhillips Company ( S) Olefin manufacturing feedstock; specialty solvents; alcohol denaturant fuel blendstock ( S) Naphtha, C4   11 alkane, branched and linear In Table II of this unit, EPA provides the following information ( to the extent that such information is not claimed as CBI) on the Notices of Commencement to manufacture received:

II. 37 NOTICES OF COMMENCEMENT FROM: 12/ 01/ 03 TO 12/ 24/ 03 Case No. Received Date Commencement Notice End Date Chemical P   01   0688 12/ 17/ 03 12/ 11/ 03 ( G) Alkyl aryl sulfonate, calcium salt P   01   0900 12/ 18/ 03 12/ 05/ 03 ( G) Carboxylic acid salt P   01   0904 12/ 09/ 03 11/ 15/ 03 ( S) Silane, ethenyltriethoxy, reaction products with silica P   02   0404 12/ 09/ 03 11/ 19/ 03 ( G) Aliphatic polyester polyurethane with tertiary amine P   02   0816 12/ 03/ 03 11/ 20/ 03 ( G) Polyaromatic urethane P   03   0046 12/ 11/ 03 11/ 25/ 03 ( S) 1 propanaminium, 3 amino n( carboxymethyl) n, n dimethyl, n soya acyl derivs., inner salts P   03   0419 12/ 10/ 03 12/ 02/ 03 ( G) Substituted cuprate [ triazin hydroxy. alpha. o][[( hydroxy. alpha. o) sulfophenyl] azo. alpha. n1] methoxyphenyl] azo. alpha. n1] naphthalenedisulfonato, sodium salt P   03   0420 12/ 08/ 03 11/ 21/ 03 ( G) N, n alkenebis n fatty acid amide P   03   0489 12/ 08/ 03 11/ 13/ 03 ( G) Poly ( dimethyl) siloxane P   03   0490 12/ 08/ 03 11/ 13/ 03 ( G) Poly ( dimethyl) siloxane P   03   0491 12/ 08/ 03 11/ 13/ 03 ( G) Poly( dimethyl) siloxane P   03   0533 12/ 18/ 03 11/ 25/ 03 ( S) 2 propenoic acid, 2 methyl, ( trimethoxysilyl) methyl ester P   03   0560 12/ 15/ 03 12/ 03/ 03 ( G) Macrocyclic alkoxy ether P   03   0567 12/ 05/ 03 11/ 05/ 03 ( G) Phosphonium salt of substituted alkylsulfonate P   03   0578 12/ 15/ 03 11/ 21/ 03 ( G) Acrylic solution polymer P   03   0589 12/ 16/ 03 11/ 19/ 03 ( G) Polyurethane prepolymer P   03   0605 12/ 22/ 03 11/ 26/ 03 ( G) Styrene acrylic copolymer P   03   0615 12/ 10/ 03 12/ 02/ 03 ( G) Hydrolyzed silane P   03   0620 12/ 05/ 03 11/ 17/ 03 ( G) Aminocarboxylic acid, alkaline salt P   03   0621 12/ 05/ 03 11/ 17/ 03 ( G) Aminocarboxylic acid, alkaline salt P   03   0622 12/ 18/ 03 11/ 28/ 03 ( G) Substituted alkanediol diacrylate P   03   0637 12/ 08/ 03 10/ 31/ 03 ( G) Polysiloxane P   03   0665 12/ 02/ 03 10/ 27/ 03 ( G) Alkyd resin P   03   0668 12/ 08/ 03 11/ 19/ 03 ( G) Acrylic solution polymer P   03   0672 12/ 17/ 03 11/ 11/ 03 ( S) Boron, trifluoro( tetrahydrofuran), ( t 4), polymer with 3 methyl 3[( 2,2,2 trifluoroethoxy) methyl] oxetane, ether with 2,2 dimethyl 1,3 propanediol ( 2: 1), bis( hydrogen sulfate), diammonium salt P   03   0673 12/ 17/ 03 11/ 11/ 03 ( S) Boron, trifluoro( tetrahydrofuran), ( t 4), polymer with 3 methyl 3[( 2,2,3,3,3 pentafluoropropoxy) methyl] oxetane, ether with 2,2 dimethyl 1,3 propanediol ( 2: 1), bis( hydrogen sulfate), diammonium salt VerDate jul< 14> 2003 16: 30 Jan 22, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 23JAN1. SGM 23JAN1 3349 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 15 / Friday, January 23, 2004 / Notices II. 37 NOTICES OF COMMENCEMENT FROM: 12/ 01/ 03 TO 12/ 24/ 03   Continued Case No. Received Date Commencement Notice End Date Chemical P   03   0697 12/ 11/ 03 11/ 05/ 03 ( G) Rosin, polymer with a monocarboxylic acid, alkylphenol, formaldehyde, maleic anhydride and pentaerythritol. P   03   0705 12/ 02/ 03 11/ 02/ 03 ( G) Polycarboxylate polymer with alkenyloxyalkylol modified poly( oxyalkylenediyl), calcium potassium salt P   03   0723 12/ 18/ 03 12/ 09/ 03 ( G) Substituted alkylamino phenyl azo substitute isoindole P   03   0746 12/ 23/ 03 11/ 26/ 03 ( G) Polymeric aromatic amine colorant P   03   0754 12/ 02/ 03 11/ 10/ 03 ( G) Telechelic polyacrylates P   03   0760 12/ 19/ 03 12/ 11/ 03 ( S) 1 octanesulfonic acid P   03   0765 12/ 18/ 03 12/ 06/ 03 ( G) Phenol, 4,4 ( 1 methylethylidene) bis, polymer with ( chloromethyl) oxirane, reaction products with a cycloaliphatic amine P   03   0766 12/ 15/ 03 11/ 14/ 03 ( G) Alkoxysilyldiesteramine P   03   0768 12/ 18/ 03 12/ 08/ 03 ( G) Reactive azo dye P   96   0434 12/ 02/ 03 11/ 19/ 03 ( G) Isocyanate terminated polyester polyurethane prepolymer P   97   1087 12/ 10/ 03 11/ 17/ 03 ( G) Alkyl me siloxanes List of Subjects Environmental protection, Chemicals, Premanufacturer notices.

Dated: January 16, 2004 Carolyn Thornton, Acting, Director, Information Management Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. [ FR Doc. 04   1448 Filed 1   22   04; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   S FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [ CC Docket Numbers 96   45 and 97   21; FCC 03   313]

Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Ysleta Independent School District, et al.

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission affirmed the Schools and Libraries Division's decisions and denied the Requests for Review filed by Ysleta Independent School District, El Paso, Texas, et al. However, the Commission waived the filing window for Funding Year 2002 to permit the above captioned schools to resubmit requests for eligible products and services for Funding Year 2002. DATES: The Commission's decisions on the Requests for Review addressed in this order were effective December 8, 2003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy Firth, Attorney, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, ( 202) 418   7400, TTY ( 202) 418   0484. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Order in CC Docket Nos. 96   45 and 97   21 released on December 8, 2003. The full text of this document is available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room CY   A257, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.

I. Introduction 1. In this Order, before the Commission is a Request for Review by the Ysleta Independent School District ( Ysleta), El Paso, Texas, and similar Requests for Review filed by seven other schools. International Business Machines, Inc. ( IBM) also files a Request for Review in most of the appeals. The schools and IBM seek review of decisions of the Schools and Libraries Division ( SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company ( Administrator), denying $ 250,977,707.08 in schools and libraries universal service support mechanism discounts to the schools for Funding Year 2002. Because each appeal raises very similar issues, we consolidate our review here. We affirm SLD's decisions and deny the Requests for Review. Under the terms, however, we waive the filing window for Funding Year 2002 to permit the above captioned schools to resubmit requests for eligible products and services for Funding Year 2002 under the terms. 2. The Commission is deeply concerned about a number of practices that undermine the framework of the competitive bidding process established by the Commission's Universal Service Order, 62 FR 32862 ( June 17, 1997). If allowed to persist, the practices that we address in this Order could suppress fair and open competitive bidding, and ultimately thwart the goal of effective, efficient, and equitable distribution of universal service support to eligible schools and libraries. The Commission has directed program applicants to take full advantage of the competitive market to obtain cost effective services and to minimize waste, fraud, and abuse. Reliance on competitive markets also assures that program funds can be distributed as widely and as equitably as possible among the applicants. To enhance competitive market processes, the Commission has developed a process in which applicants first develop detailed technology plans that describe their technology needs and goals in a manner consistent with their educational or informational objectives. Having determined the services for which they would seek E rate discounts, applicants would then submit for posting on the Administrator's website an FCC Form 470, listing the desired services, consistent with the technology plan, with sufficient specificity to enable potential bidders to submit bids for E rate eligible services. Applicants could indicate on the FCC Form 470 if they also had a Request for Proposal ( RFP) providing additional detail on the services sought. Once an applicant received bids with specific prices quoted for eligible services, it would select the most cost effective services, with price as the primary factor. Where consistent with these practices, applicants would rely on state and local procurement processes. This is the foundation upon which the Commission's rules and orders are based. 3. The procurement processes presented in the instant Requests for Review thwart the Commission's competitive bidding policies. The factual scenarios of the different applicants vary to some degree, but all present troubling conduct or outcomes that are inconsistent with the competitive bidding procedures required by our rules and orders. Most of the above captioned applicants selected a Systems Integrator to provide VerDate jul< 14> 2003 16: 30 Jan 22, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 23JAN1. SGM 23JAN1


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49390-49391]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20302]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0707; Airspace Docket No. 11-AEA-17]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Palmyra, PA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E Airspace at Palmyra,
PA, to accommodate new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System
(GPS) Standard Instrument Approach Procedures at Reigle Field. This
action would enhance the safety and airspace management of Instrument
Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 26, 2011. The
Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51,
subject to the annual revision of FAA, Order 7400.9 and publication of
conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001;
Telephone: 1-800-647-5527; Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify the
Docket Number FAA-2011-0707; Airspace Docket No. 11-AEA-17, at the
beginning of your comments. You may also submit and review received
comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O.
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and
suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned
regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited
on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and
energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2011-0707; Airspace Docket No. 11-ASO-17) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Annotators wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket
No. FAA-2011-0707; Airspace Docket No. 11-ASO-17.'' The postcard will
be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded from and
comments submitted through http://www.regulations.gov. Recently
published rulemaking documents can also be accessed through the FAA's
Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. An
informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at
the office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, room 210, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>, to
request a copy of Advisory circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is considering an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to establish Class E airspace at Palmyra,
PA, providing the controlled airspace required to support the new RNAV
GPS standard instrument approach procedures for Reigle Field.
Controlled airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
would be established for the safety and management of IFR operations at
the airport.
    Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.9U, dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15,
2010, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This proposed rulemaking is promulgated under the authority
described in subtitle VII, part, A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under
that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign
the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This proposed regulation is within the scope
of that authority as it would establish Class E airspace at Reigle
Field, Palmyra, PA.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9U, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 18, 2010, effective September 15, 2010,
is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

AEA PA E5 Palmyra, PA [New]

Reigle Field, PA
    (Lat. 40[deg]17'15'' N., long. 76[deg]34'39'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 9.6-mile radius of Reigle Field.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August 1, 2011.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2011-20302 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 2437]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00546]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR14-14-000]

Koch Pipeline Company, L.P.; Notice of Petition for Waiver

    Take notice that on December 16, 2013, pursuant to Rule 202(a)(2)
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR
385.207(a)(2)(2013), Koch Pipeline Company, L.P. (KPL) requests that
the Commission grant a waiver of the Interstate Commerce Act (ICA)
section 6 and section 20 tariff filing and reporting requirements
applicable to interstate common carrier pipelines.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in this proceeding
must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must
serve a copy of that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceeding are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on January 15, 2014.

    Dated: January 8, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-00546 Filed 1-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P