[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82098-82106]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32731]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63597; File No. SR-BX-2010-059]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of Amendment No. 1 to Proposed Rule Change To Create a Listing
Market on the Exchange

December 22, 2010.
    On August 20, 2010, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (the ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change
to create a listing market on the Exchange. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the Federal Register on September 8,
2010.\3\ The Commission received three comments on the proposal.\4\ The
Commission subsequently extended the time period in which to either
approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change,
or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the
proposed rule change, to December 7, 2010.\5\ On December 6, 2010, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change as described
in Items I and II below, which items have been prepared by the
Exchange. On December 7, 2010, the Commission instituted proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified
by Amendment No. 1.\6\ Although the Order Instituting Proceedings
included a summary of Amendment No. 1, the Commission is publishing the
full text of Amendment No. 1 for the benefit of interested persons who
wish to comment on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62818 (September 1,
2010), 75 FR 54665 (``Notice'').
    \4\ See Letters to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Commission,
from Tom A. Alberg, Managing Director and Founder, Madrona Venture
Group, dated December 1, 2010; Michael R. Trocchio, Bingham
McCutchen LLP, dated October 3, 2010; and William F. Galvin,
Secretary of the Commonwealth, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, dated
September 28, 2010. For a summary of these comments, see Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 63448 (December 7, 2010), 75 FR 77036
(December 10, 2010) (``Order Instituting Proceedings'').
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63105 (October 14,
2010), 75 FR 64772 (October 20, 2010).
    \6\ See Order Instituting Proceedings, supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of Amendment No. 1 to the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to create a listing market, which will be
called ``BX'' [sic].\7\ Following Commission approval, the Exchange
will announce the operational date of the new market in an Equity
Trader Alert and press release. The proposed rules will become
effective on the operational date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Commission notes that BX has proposed, in this Amendment
No. 1, to name the new listing market as ``The BX Venture Market,''
rather than ``BX.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at http://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com, at BX's principal office, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    In connection with the acquisition of the former Boston Stock
Exchange by The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc., the Exchange discontinued its
listing marketplace and delisted all securities previously listed on
the Exchange.\8\ Since January 2009, the Exchange has operated as a
trading venue only, allowing market participants to trade securities
listed on other national securities exchanges pursuant to unlisted
trading privileges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59265 (January 16,
2009), 74 FR 4790 (January 27, 2009) (approving SR-BSE-2008-36
relating to the delisting of all securities from the Exchange in
connection with the Exchange's discontinuation of trading).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is proposing to begin listing securities again,
through the creation of a new listing market, to be called ``The BX
Venture Market.'' The BX Venture Market will have minimal quantitative
listing standards, but have qualitative requirements, which are, in

many respects, similar to those required for listing on The NASDAQ
Stock Market (``Nasdaq'') and other national securities exchanges.\9\
The Exchange believes that this market will provide an attractive
alternative to companies being delisted from another national
securities exchange for failure to meet quantitative listing standards
(including price or other market value measures) and to smaller
companies contemplating an initial exchange listing. The Exchange
further believes that the proposed listing venue will provide a
transparent, well-regulated marketplace for these companies and their
investors.\10\ As is currently the case with respect to the trading
occurring on the Exchange pursuant to unlisted trading privileges,
FINRA will regulate market activity and staff of the Exchange will
monitor real-time trading of securities listed on the BX Venture
Market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The Exchange notes that not all qualitative requirements
imposed by other exchanges would be required. See Listing
Requirements, infra, for a full discussion of the proposed
quantitative and qualitative requirements for listing on BX.
    \10\ The Exchange will propose in a separate rule filing changes
to the BX Equities Platform to govern trading of, and reporting of
transactions in, these listed securities and introducing and
modifying market data products to permit dissemination of accurate
quotation information and reporting of transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange will disseminate quotation and transaction information
about securities listed on the BX Venture Market via several market
data products to ensure broad dissemination of quotation and last sale
information consistent with that provided by the network processors for
national market system securities. This information will include a
market center identifier and the Exchange will adopt a display
requirement such that data vendors who receive data from the Exchange
will have to identify when the BX Venture Market is the listing market
for a security and clearly differentiate those securities from
securities listed on Nasdaq or other exchanges or traded over-the-
counter when displaying information to external users on their single
security quotation screens.
    The Exchange is also committed to ensuring that quotations and
transaction information from BX are consolidated fully with similar
information from over-the-counter quoting and trading that FINRA
supervises, and is working with FINRA in that regard.
    The assignment of symbols for companies listed on the BX Venture
Market will be governed by the existing National Market System Plan for
the Selection and Reservation of Securities Symbols, which is the
exclusive means of allocating and using trading symbols. Pursuant to
that Plan, securities listed on the BX Venture Market, like every other
national securities exchange today, are eligible to have a trading
symbol of from [sic] one to five characters. This eligibility is
important because the BX Venture Market is intended to afford a listing
venue for companies formerly listed on other national securities
exchanges, which will want to retain their symbols.\11\ In approving
the symbology Plan, the Commission distinguished securities listed on
an exchange, which can trade with a symbol of from [sic] one to five
characters, from those trading over the counter, which can trade only
with a four or five character symbol, noting that ``[e]xchange listing
standards are approved by the Commission and must include corporate
governance requirements that comply with Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange
[sic] Act. Issuers traded on over-the-counter equity venues (including
the OTCBB and Pink Sheets) are not subject to such listing standards.''
\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Commission found that allowing all exchanges to utilize
from one to five characters minimizes investor confusion when a
company changes its listing from one venue to another. Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 58904 (November 6, 2008), 73 FR 67218 at
67227 (November 13, 2008) (``The Commission finds that allowing the
automatic portability of a symbol in the event that an issuer
transfers its listing to another exchange will further the purposes
of the Act and should reduce investor confusion by allowing the
symbol already associated with the issuer to continue to be used by
the issuer on the new exchange.''). The Commission also noted that
the portability feature of the plan would promote ``competition
among listing markets, including potential new listing markets.''
Id. at 67224 (emphasis added).
    \12\ Id. at 67225 (footnotes omitted). The Exchange notes that
it will have listing standards approved by the Commission, including
corporate governance requirements that comply with Rule 10A-3, and
go far beyond those requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Listing Requirements
    The BX Venture Market would list Common Stock, Preferred Stock,
Ordinary Shares, Shares or Certificates of Beneficial Interest of
Trust, Limited Partnership Interests, American Depositary Receipts
(ADR), American Depositary Shares (ADS), Units, Rights and Warrants. To
be listed on the BX Venture Market, companies will need to meet the
following qualitative listing standards, each of which is equivalent to
the comparable listing standard of Nasdaq or is derived from the
Federal securities laws:
    (a) The company must be registered under Section 12(b) of the Act
\13\ and current in its periodic filings with the Commission and, as a
result, subject to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
\14\ (proposed Rule 5210(a) [sic] \15\);
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(b).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 7201-7266.
    \15\ The Commission notes that the correct reference should be
proposed Rule 5210(a) and 5210(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (b) The company must have a fully independent Audit Committee
comprised of at least three members and comply with the requirements of
SEC Rule 10A-3, promulgated under the Act \16\ (proposed Rule 5605(c));
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 240.10A-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (c) The company must have independent directors make compensation
decisions for executive officers (proposed Rule 5605(d));
    (d) The company will be prohibited from taking any corporate action
with the effect of nullifying, restricting or disparately reducing the
per share voting rights of holders of an outstanding class of the
company's common stock registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Act
(proposed Rule 5640);
    (e) The company's auditor will be required to be registered with
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board \17\ (proposed Rules
5210(b) and 5250(c)(3));
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Section 102 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 15 U.S.C. 7212.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (f) The company will be required to hold an annual shareholders'
meeting and solicit proxies for each shareholders' meeting (proposed
Rule 5620);
    (g) The company will be required to obtain shareholder approval for
the use of equity compensation (proposed Rule 5635);
    (h) The company will be required to adopt a code of conduct,
applicable to all directors, officers and employees (proposed Rule
5610);
    (i) The company will be required to conduct an appropriate review
and oversight of all related party transactions, to address potential
conflict of interest situations (proposed Rule 5630);
    (j) The company will be required to disclose material information
through any Regulation FD compliant method (or combination of methods)
(proposed Rule 5250(b) and IM-5250-1);
    (k) The listed securities must be eligible for a Direct
Registration Program operated by a clearing agency registered under
Section 17A of the Act \18\ (proposed Rules 5210(c) and 5255);
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (l) Public ``shells'' would not be allowed to list (proposed Rule
5101); and
    (m) The Exchange will conduct a public interest review of the
company and significant persons associated with

it (proposed Rule 5101 and IM-5101-1). A company would not be eligible
for listing if any executive officer or director was involved in any
event that occurred during the prior five years that is required to be
disclosed under Item 401(f)(2)--(8) of Regulation S-K.
    In addition, the BX Venture Market would apply the following
quantitative listing standards, set out in proposed Rules 5505 (initial
listing) and 5550 (continued listing), which are designed to assure a
minimum level of trading consistent with a public market for the
securities:
    (a) 200,000 publicly held shares;
    (b) 200 public shareholders, at least 100 of which must be round
lot holders for initial listing, and 200 public shareholders for
continued listing;
    (c) A market value of listed securities of at least $2 million for
initial listing and $1 million for continued listing;
    (d) Two market makers; and
    (e) A minimum initial listing price of $0.25 per share for
securities previously listed on a national securities exchange and
$1.00 per share for securities previously quoted in the over-the-
counter market. For continued listing, securities will be required to
maintain a minimum $0.25 per share bid price.

Further, with respect to companies not previously listed on a national
securities exchange, the BX Venture Market will also require for
initial listing that the company have either $1 million stockholders'
equity or $5 million total assets, a one year operating history, and a
plan to maintain sufficient working capital for the company's planned
business for at least twelve months after the first day of listing.
    The Exchange would also require that rights and warrants will only
be eligible for initial and continued listing if the underlying
security is listed on the BX Venture Market or is a covered security,
as described in Section 18(b) of the Securities Act of 1933.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 77r(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed listing standards are designed to allow companies that
are being delisted from another national securities exchange for
failure to meet that exchange's quantitative listing requirements the
opportunity to provide their investors with a better regulated, more
transparent trading environment than may otherwise be available in the
over-the-counter markets. In addition, the Exchange believes that
allowing these companies to continue trading on a national securities
exchange may enable some institutional investors to continue their
ownership stake in the company, which could provide greater stability
to the company's shareholder base and possibly avoid forced sales by
such investors.\20\ The Exchange also believes that companies currently
traded over-the-counter could view this market as an aspirational step
towards a listing on another national securities exchange. The Exchange
believes that the agreement of such companies to comply with the
Exchange's corporate governance standards and the application of the
Exchange's public interest authority will provide additional
protections to their investors than would be available in their present
trading venue. Moreover, the Exchange believes that a listing on the BX
Venture Market could help such companies raise capital, in turn
promoting job creation within the United States. Finally, the Exchange
believes that the BX Venture Market will be a more attractive
alternative to domestic companies that might otherwise have considered
a listing on non-U.S. junior markets, which generally have lower
listing requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ Many institutional investors have investment policies that
limit their ownership to securities listed on a national securities
exchange, or that prohibit the ownership of securities that only are
traded in the over-the-counter market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nonetheless, the Exchange recognizes that the listing requirements
for the BX Venture Market will be lower than those of the NASDAQ Stock
Market and other national securities exchanges, and that the market
will, therefore, attract smaller, less liquid companies, which may
create higher risks for investors. As such, to avoid investor
confusion, we will make every effort to distinguish the proposed BX
Venture Market from the NASDAQ Stock Market, which is also owned by the
NASDAQ OMX Group. In that regard, the listing rules of the BX Venture
Market will specify that a BX Venture Market-listed company should
refer to its listing as on the BX Venture Market, unless otherwise
required by applicable rules or regulations, and that such company
should never represent that it is listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market. To
enforce this prohibition, the Exchange will monitor the press releases
issued by a BX Venture Market-listed company and will annually review
the company's Web site to determine how the company is referring to its
listing. Similarly, in describing this listing venue, the Exchange will
generally refer to it as the BX Venture Market and not as NASDAQ OMX
BX. The Exchange will also include information on its Web site
describing the differences between the BX Venture Market and other
national securities exchanges, including Nasdaq. Finally, as noted
earlier, the Exchange will require data vendors to identify when the BX
Venture Market is the listing market for a security and clearly
differentiate those securities from securities listed on Nasdaq or
other exchanges or traded over-the-counter when displaying information
to external users on their single security quotation screens.
    The BX Venture Market will not initially list a company if an
executive officer or director of the company was involved in any event
that occurred during the prior five years that is required to be
disclosed under Item 401(f)(2)--(8) of Regulation S-K.\21\ These events
include criminal convictions and pending charges, violations of
securities laws, and court or administrative actions barring or
limiting the individual from certain security related activities.
Similarly, the Exchange will review proxy statements and other public
filings of listed companies. If a listed company discloses a proceeding
against an executive officer or director under Item 401(f)(2)--(8) of
Regulation S-K, the Exchange would provide the company with thirty days
to remove the executive officer or director. If the company does not do
so, the Exchange would send a delisting notification to the company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 17 CFR 229.401(f)(2)-(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange will have the discretionary authority to
deny listing to or delist any otherwise qualified security when
necessary to preserve and strengthen the quality of and public
confidence in its market. Proposed IM-5101-1 provides a non-exclusive
description of circumstances where the Exchange may exercise that
discretion, including when an individual associated with the company
has a history of regulatory misconduct that does not implicate the
automatic bar described above. This would arise, for example, where an
executive officer or director has reported misconduct that occurred
between five and ten years before the disclosure or misconduct not
required to be disclosed under Item 401 of Regulation S-K. This would
also arise when an individual who is not an executive officer or
director, but who has significant influence on or importance to the
company, has a history of regulatory misconduct. In that regard, the
Exchange ordinarily would apply its discretionary authority to deny
initial or continued listing to a company if a control person, such as
a significant shareholder, has a regulatory history, which is required
to be disclosed under Item 401(g) of Regulation S-K.\22\ In

order to apply this authority, the Exchange intends to conduct
background investigations of executive officers and directors and other
significant people associated with a company in connection with its
review of applications for initial listing, as well as whenever a new
executive officer or director is associated with a BX Venture Market-
listed company, using public databases, such as Lexis-Nexis. The
Exchange will also retain outside firms to assist in its review as
needed, including investigative, accounting and law firms. In that
regard, the Exchange expects that it would especially rely on outside
firms when researching a regulatory history that may have occurred in
jurisdictions outside of the United States, where the availability of
information and language barriers could otherwise complicate such
research. The Exchange's listing application will also solicit
information about certain inquiries, investigations, lawsuits,
litigation, arbitrations, hearings, or other legal or administrative
proceedings against the Company and its executive officers, directors,
and ten percent or greater shareholders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ The Exchange may, however, in rare circumstances, permit
the listing of a company if, for example, the shareholder did not
acquire its shares directly from the company and has no role in the
management or operations of the company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The head of the Exchange's Listing Department, who will have no
marketing responsibilities and will report to NASDAQ OMX's Chief
Regulatory Officer, will be involved in all decisions concerning
whether to permit or deny listing to a company based on a public
interest concern and the Exchange's Chief Regulatory Officer will be
required to approve the listing of any company that has disclosed
information about an executive officer, director, or control person
under Items 401(f)(2)-(8) or 401(g) of Regulation S-K that does not
trigger the automatic bar described above.
    The Exchange will not approve for initial listing, or allow the
continued listing, of shell companies.\23\ This prohibition is based on
concerns that the investors in shell companies are unaware of the
ultimate business in which they are investing and that trading in such
securities is more susceptible to market manipulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ Proposed Rule 5101 sets forth a number of factors that the
Exchange will consider in determining whether a Company is a shell,
including whether the Company is considered a ``shell company'' as
defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Act, 17 CFR 240.12b-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    BX listings and delistings will be processed by the same staff
currently in Nasdaq's Listing Qualifications Department, which
presently includes 13 continued listing analysts and four initial
listing analysts. This staff is extremely experienced in regulatory
analysis, with the average person having over ten years of experience
at Nasdaq. Should the workload resulting from the new BX Venture Market
prove sufficiently high, the Exchange and Nasdaq have each committed to
hiring additional staff, as necessary. In that regard, the staffing
within Listing Qualifications is now, and will continue to be, reviewed
regularly by Nasdaq's Chief Regulatory Officer and Regulatory Oversight
Committee and will also be reviewed by the Exchange's Regulatory
Oversight Committee.
    The Exchange proposes that any company that meets the quantitative
(e.g., financial) requirements for listing on Nasdaq will not be
allowed to initially list on the BX Venture Market. This will assure
that such companies only become listed on the exchange with higher
listing standards.
    Given that the Exchange expects to list companies that do not meet
the quantitative listing requirements of the primary existing national
securities exchanges, it is expected that BX Venture Market-listed
companies will include smaller companies and companies facing business
or other challenges. Thus, the proposed quantitative standards for the
BX Venture Market were deliberately structured to be lower than those
of the other primary exchanges. In that regard, the minimum price
requirement for listing on the BX Venture Market will be $0.25 per
share for a security previously listed on another national securities
exchange and $1.00 per share for a security previously quoted in the
over-the-counter market or listing in connection with its initial
public offering. Until September 30, 2011, the Exchange would consider
any company that was listed on another national securities exchange at
any time since January 1, 2008, to be eligible to list with a $0.25 per
share price. The Exchange believes it appropriate to consider a company
delisted since January 1, 2008, as previously quoted on another
national securities exchange because the BX Venture Market would not
have been available to such companies when they were delisted. The
Exchange believes it is reasonable to look back to January 1, 2008,
when the financial markets began facing difficulties, which resulted in
an unusually large number of companies being delisted. Furthermore, the
Exchange believes it is appropriate to continue this treatment until
September 30, 2011, to assure that such companies have an adequate
opportunity to learn about the BX Venture Market and sufficient time to
complete their application and have that application processed by the
Exchange. After September 30, 2011, a company will be considered to
have been previously listed on a national securities exchange, and
therefore eligible to list with a $0.25 per share price, only if it was
listed on such an exchange at any time during the three months prior to
its listing on the BX Venture Market. The Exchange believes that this
three month period will allow the company sufficient time to apply for
listing on the BX Venture Market and have its application processed.
    For continued listing, a security will be required to maintain a
minimum $0.25 per share bid price.\24\ If the security does not
maintain a minimum $0.25 per share bid price for 20 consecutive trading
days, Exchange staff would issue a Staff Delisting Determination and
the security would be suspended from trading on the BX Venture
Market.\25\ A company could appeal that determination to a Hearings
Panel; however, such an appeal would not stay the suspension of the
security.\26\ During the Hearings Panel process, the security could
regain compliance by achieving a $0.25 per share minimum bid price
while trading on another venue, such as the over-the-counter market,
for ten consecutive days. However, if the company has received three or
more Staff Delisting Determinations for failure to comply with minimum
price requirement in the prior 12 months, the company could only regain
compliance by achieving a closing bid price of $0.25 per share or more
for at least 20 consecutive trading days. The Exchange believes that
this higher requirement for companies that were previously non-
compliant is appropriate to reduce the likelihood of future instances
of non-compliance and the concomitant investor confusion concerning the
ability of the company to remain listed. If the Hearings Panel
determines that the security has satisfied the applicable standard to
regain compliance, the trading halt would be terminated and the
security would resume trading on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ The Exchange notes there is also no price requirement for
initial or continued listing on the National Stock Exchange or for
continued listing on NYSE Amex and therefore that the proposed
continued listing requirement exceeds the requirement of those
exchanges.
    \25\ Proposed Rule 4120(a)(12).
    \26\ Proposed Rule 5815(a)(1)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To be eligible for initial listing, a company not previously listed
on a national securities exchange must have at least one year operating
history, a minimum of either $1 million in

stockholders' equity or $5 million in total assets, and demonstrate
that it has a plan to maintain sufficient working capital for its
planned business for at least twelve months after the first day of
listing. The Exchange believes that these requirements will help assure
that a company that was not previously subject to exchange regulation
nonetheless has a credible and sustainable business.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed public float, holder and
market maker requirements, together with the minimum market value of
listed securities requirement, will assure sufficient liquidity in
listed securities. In that regard, the Exchange notes that the
shareholder and publicly held shares requirements are comparable to, or
higher than, requirements for listing a preferred stock or secondary
class of common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market, which require 100
round lot shareholders and 200,000 publicly held shares. The Exchange
is not aware of any difficulties in the trading in securities meeting
these requirements. Further, requiring two market makers will assure
competing quotations for potential buyers and sellers of the securities
listed on the BX Venture Market. Finally, the Exchange believes that
the minimum market value of listed securities requirement will help
assure that the company issuing the securities is of a sufficient size
to generate interest from investors and market participants. While
these proposed standards may be lower than those of other exchanges,
investors will be protected by the fact that securities listed on the
BX Venture Market would be considered penny stocks under Exchange Act
Rule 3a51-1, unless they qualify for an exemption from the definition
of a penny stock.\27\ As such, broker-dealers would be required to pre-
approve their customers for trading in penny stocks and investors will
obtain the disclosures required to be made by broker-dealers in
connection with penny stock transactions, providing them with trade and
market information prior to effecting a transaction. Further, there
will be no ``blue sky'' exemption available under Section 18 of the
Securities Act of 1933,\28\ so companies will be required to satisfy
State law registration requirements and other State laws that regulate
the sale and offering of securities. Because some State laws and
regulations may provide an exemption from certain registration or
``blue sky'' requirements for companies listed on the former Boston
Stock Exchange, based on the higher listing standards previously
applied by that Exchange, proposed Rule 5001 would provide that the
Exchange will take action to delist any company listed on BX that
attempts to rely on such an exemption. Companies will also agree not to
rely on any such exemption as a provision of the BX Listing Agreement.
Listed companies will be required to represent to the Exchange that
they are not relying on any such exemption in connection with any
securities offering and will be required to provide the Exchange with
copies of any ``blue sky memoranda'' prepared in connection with the
issuance of shares.\29\ These steps will allow the Exchange to assure
that the company is not inappropriately relying on such an exemption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 17 CFR 240.3a51-1. The Exchange is not seeking an exemption
from the penny stock rules for securities listed on BX; however, a
security may be excluded from the definition of a penny stock as a
result of the security having a price in excess of $5 or its issuer
having net tangible assets in excess of $2 million (if the issuer
has been in continuous operation for at least three years) or $5
million (if the issuer has been in continuous operation for less
than three years) or average revenue of at least $6 million for the
last three years. Rule 3a51-1(d) and (g), 17 CFR 240.3a51-1(d) and
(g).
    \28\ 15 U.S.C. 77r.
    \29\ Proposed Rule 5250(e)(7). The Exchange has proposed to add
these requirements in response to comments submitted on the original
proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The BX Venture Market corporate governance requirements are
generally comparable to those of the other exchanges. The Exchange
would require that a listed company have an audit committee comprised
of at least three independent directors that also meet the requirements
of SEC Rule 10A-3.\30\ For a director to be considered an independent
director, the company's board would have to determine that the
individual does not have a relationship which, in the board's opinion,
would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying
out the responsibilities of a director.\31\ The board would be
precluded from finding a director independent based on certain
relationships, including if that director is currently an employee of
the company or was employed by the company during the prior three years
(including as an executive officer), accepted certain compensation or
payments from the company during the prior three years, or had a family
member with certain affiliations with the company.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ 17 CFR 240.10A-3. See proposed Rule 5605(c)(2). Companies
may be eligible for a phase-in or cure period with respect to
certain of these requirements.
    \31\ Proposed Rule 5605(a)(2) and IM-5605-1. The proposed
definition of an independent director is identical to Nasdaq's
definition of an independent director.
    \32\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The audit committee would be required to have a charter setting out
its responsibilities, including the committee's purpose of overseeing
the accounting and financial reporting processes of the company and the
audits of the company's financial statements and the responsibilities
and authority necessary to comply with SEC Rule 10A-3.\33\ The audit
committee, or another independent body of the board, will also be
required to conduct an appropriate review and oversight of any related
party transaction.\34\ The Exchange believes that this requirement will
limit the potential for self-dealing in connection with any related
party transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ Proposed Rule 5605(c)(1).
    \34\ Proposed Rule 5630.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange would also require that independent directors make
compensation decisions concerning the chief executive officer and other
executive officers.\35\ Independent directors would be required to meet
on a regular basis in executive sessions.\36\ These requirements for
audit committees, compensation decisions, and executive sessions are
identical to those of Nasdaq and substantially similar to those of the
other national securities exchanges and the Exchange believes they will
serve to empower the independent directors of its listed companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ Proposed Rule 5605(d) and IM-5605-6. A company can satisfy
this requirement by having their independent directors make these
decisions in executive session, or by having independent directors
sit on a compensation committee. If the company chooses to use a
compensation committee and the committee is comprised of at least
three members, one director who is not independent as defined in
Rule 5605(a)(2) and is not a current officer or employee or a Family
Member of an officer or employee, may be appointed to the
compensation committee under exceptional and limited circumstances,
provided the company makes appropriate disclosure. Of course the
Exchange will adopt rules required by Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act following the
necessary SEC rulemaking related to that provision.
    \36\ Proposed Rule 5605(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While the Exchange would require that a listed company have at
least three independent directors to satisfy the audit committee
requirement described above, it would not require that a majority of
the company's board of directors be independent or an independent
nomination committee because the Exchange believes those requirements
could impose significant additional costs on these smaller companies
and therefore discourage companies from pursuing an otherwise
beneficial listing. In that regard, given the significant
responsibilities imposed on audit and compensation committee

members, directors who serve on these committees are sometimes
reluctant to serve on other committees. As such, if the BX Venture
Market were to also require an independent nominations committee,
companies may have to increase the size of their boards and add
additional independent directors. Similarly, requiring that independent
directors comprise a majority of a company's board could also require
companies to add additional independent directors. In each case, the
need to add independent directors would impose additional costs on the
company.\37\ Moreover, nothing in the Commission's rules or the Act
mandate these requirements.\38\ However, the Exchange believes that the
requirement for executive sessions of the independent directors will
provide a forum for the independent directors to consider whether the
governance structure of the company is appropriate and raise any
concerns, notwithstanding the lack of a majority independence and
nominations committee requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ The 2008-2009 Director Compensation Report prepared by the
National Association of Corporate Directors (available from http://www.nacdonline.org/) found that the median total direct compensation
per director was $78,060 for smaller companies (defined as companies
with annual revenues of $50 to $500 million).
    \38\ See, e.g., Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K, which requires
disclosure of non-independent directors who serve on nomination
committees, implicitly allowing such service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Companies listing on the BX Venture Market will be permitted to
phase in compliance with the audit committee and compensation committee
requirements following their listing. With respect to the audit
committee requirements, a company listing in connection with its
initial public offering would be required to have one independent
director on the committee at the time of listing; a majority of
independent members within 90 days of the date of effectiveness of the
company's registration statement; and all independent members within
one year of the date of effectiveness of the company's registration
statement. For this purposes, a company will be considered to be
listing in conjunction with an initial public offering only if it meets
the conditions in SEC Rule 10A-3(b)(1)(iv)(A), namely that the company
was not, immediately prior to the effective date of its registration
statement, required to file reports with the Commission pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Act.
    With respect to the compensation committee requirement, a company
listing in connection with its initial public offering, upon emerging
from bankruptcy, or that otherwise was not subject to a substantially
similar requirement prior to listing (such as a company only traded in
the over-the-counter market) would be required to have one independent
director on the committee at the time of listing; a majority of
independent members within 90 days of listing; and all independent
members within one year of listing. For this purposes, a company will
be considered to be listing in conjunction with an initial public
offering if immediately prior to listing it does not have a class of
common stock registered under the Act.
    A company that transfers to the BX Venture Market from another
national securities exchange with a substantially similar requirement
will be immediately subject to the audit and compensation committee
requirements, provided that the company will be afforded the balance of
any grace period afforded by the other market.
    The Exchange will require companies to adopt a code of conduct
applicable to all directors, officers and employees.\39\ Any waivers of
the code for directors or executive officers must be approved by the
board and disclosed. The Exchange believes that this requirement will
help promote the ethical behavior of individuals associated with
companies listed on the BX Venture Market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\ Proposed Rule 5610.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange will require shareholder approval when a
company adopts or materially amends a stock option or purchase plan or
other equity compensation arrangement pursuant to which stock may be
acquired by officers, directors, employees, or consultants.\40\ The
Exchange would not require shareholder approval for other share
issuances, however, given that the companies expected to list on the
Exchange may have a greater need to issue shares more frequently or
more quickly, due to their expected smaller size and the business
challenges they may be facing. As such, the Exchange believes that the
cost and delay associated with seeking approval for share issuances
would discourage companies from pursuing an otherwise beneficial
listing.\41\ Nonetheless, the Exchange will require listed Companies to
provide notice of any 5% change in its shares outstanding \42\ and the
Exchange Staff will review such issuances for public interest concerns,
such as issuances significantly below the market price or for the
benefit of related parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ Proposed Rule 5635.
    \41\ In this regard, the proposed rules are comparable to the
rules of the National Stock Exchange, which require shareholder
approval for equity compensation issuances but not for other share
issuances. See National Stock Exchange Rule 15.6.
    \42\ Proposed Rule 5250(e)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Review Process
    Companies denied initial or continued listing would be afforded a
review process similar to that contained in the existing Rule 4800
Series of the Exchange's rules, which was modeled on the process
available to companies listed on Nasdaq.\43\ The Exchange's Listing
Qualifications staff only will be able to allow time-limited exceptions
for certain deficiencies from the continued listing standards, such as
the failure to file periodic reports, certain of the corporate
governance requirements and any quantitative deficiency which does not
contain a compliance period.\44\ Other of the continued listing
requirements would provide for automatic compliance periods, including
the market maker, market value of publicly held shares and audit
committee requirements.\45\ If the company fails to timely solicit
proxies or hold its annual meeting or fails to meet the minimum price
requirement, or if staff has public interest concerns in connection
with the company, Listing Qualifications staff will issue an immediate
delisting letter to the company.\46\ Any other deficiency would result
in the Listing Qualifications staff issuing a Public Reprimand Letter
or a delisting notification.\47\ Hearings Panels composed of
individuals not affiliated with the Exchange would be permitted to
grant additional time to companies that received a delisting
notification, or that were denied initial listing. A company could
appeal a decision of the Hearings Panel to the Listing and Hearing
Review Council, which is a committee appointed by the Exchange's Board
to act for the Board with respect to listing decisions.\48\ The Listing
and Hearing Review Council decision would be final, unless it is called
for a discretionary review by the Exchange Board. The compliance
periods and discretion to allow a non-compliant company to remain
listed are generally shorter on the BX Venture Exchange than would be
allowed an equivalent company listed on Nasdaq. For example, a Hearings
Panel would only be permitted to grant 90 calendar days for a company
to regain compliance with a listing standard, instead of the

180 calendar days available on Nasdaq. Similarly, a company that falls
below the market value of listed securities requirement would be
provided a 90 calendar day compliance period, instead of the 180 days
available to a Nasdaq company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ Nasdaq Listing Rules 5800-5899.
    \44\ Proposed Rule 5810(c)(2).
    \45\ Proposed Rule 5810(c)(3).
    \46\ Proposed Rule 5810(c)(1).
    \47\ Proposed Rule 5810(c).
    \48\ Section 6.1 of the By-Laws on NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oversight
    FINRA will regulate market activity on the BX Venture Market, as it
does today for Nasdaq. Based on its breadth of experience overseeing
the over-the-counter markets, FINRA will also enhance its review
process by calibrating its surveillance patterns to detect potential
issues that may arise particularly in low priced stocks. FINRA's review
will include trading which takes place on the over-the-counter market
in securities listed on the BX Venture Market. In addition, SMARTS
Group, which is a world-leading technology provider of market
surveillance solutions to exchanges and regulators around the
world,\49\ will create a new suite of quoting and trading patterns to
detect suspicious activity in low priced and less widely traded
securities. Further, FINRA will review the activity of member firms
quoting on the BX Venture Market when conducting their reviews of these
firms. This review will include ``focused exams'' concentrated on sales
practices and firm oversight.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ SMARTS Group is a subsidiary of NASDAQ OMX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange will provide a monthly report to the SEC staff
describing any significant developments on the BX Venture Exchange,
including companies added or removed from the market during that
period. In addition, the Exchange's Chief Regulatory Officer will
provide quarterly reports describing the listing and surveillance
activities of the Exchange during the prior quarter. The Exchange will
also provide copies of the Listing Department's procedures manuals to
the Commission's Office of Compliance, Inspections and Examinations.
Fees
    Companies would be required to submit an application review fee of
$7,500 with their application for listing on the BX Venture Market, and
would be required to pay a $15,000 annual fee for the first class
listed on the Exchange and $5,000 for each additional class. The annual
fee would be pro-rated for a company's first year of their listing. The
application review fee will allow the Exchange to recover some of the
costs associated with the initial review of the company's application,
including staff time and the systems supporting the initial review
process. The annual fee would similarly offset the staff and system
costs of continued monitoring of the company. The proposed application
and annual fees are substantially less than those charged by other
national securities exchanges.\50\ Companies that were previously
listed on Nasdaq would receive a credit, which can only be used to
offset the annual fee, for any annual fees paid to Nasdaq during the
same calendar year that they initially list on the BX Venture Market,
for the months following their delisting from Nasdaq. The Exchange
believes this credit is a reasonable allocation of fees under the Act
because the Exchange and Nasdaq have the same ultimate parent, The
NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc., and the company will have paid Nasdaq a non-
refundable fee to provide similar services as those that will be
provided by the Exchange under its annual fee. As such, the Exchange
believes it would be inequitable to charge the company a second fee in
the same year to support the provision of those services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ For example, the initial listing fees for listing common
stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market range from $50,000 to $75,000 and
the annual fees are $27,500; the initial listing fees for listing
common stock on NYSE Amex range from $50,000 to $70,000 and the
annual fees range from $27,500 to $40,000; the initial listing fees
for listing common stock on the New York Stock Exchange range from
$150,000 to $250,000 and the annual fees range from $38,000 to
$500,000. See Nasdaq Rule 5920(a)(1) and (c)(1)(A), NYSE Amex Listed
Company Guide Sections 140 and 141, and NYSE Listed Company Manual
902.03.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Fees would also be assessed for certain one-time events, such as a
$7,500 fee for substitution listing events, a $2,500 fee for record-
keeping changes, and a $4,000 or $5,000 fee for a written or oral
hearing, respectively. These fees are identical to those charged on
Nasdaq.
    Under Proposed Rule 5602, a company considering a specific action
or transaction can request an interpretation from the Exchange, and in
return, the Exchange will prepare a responsive letter as to how the
rules apply to the proposed action or transaction. No company is
required to request an interpretation, and staff will orally discuss
the application of the Exchange's rules with companies without any
additional charge. However, if the company seeks a written response,
the Exchange proposes to charge a $15,000 fee to recoup the cost of
staff's time in reviewing and responding to the request.\51\ The
Exchange believes that the fee is appropriate, as the written response
is applicable only to the company that requests it. The Exchange also
believes that the written interpretive process, and the associated fee,
will provide an additional public benefit in that staff will prepare
anonymous summaries of interpretations, as well as frequently asked
questions based on requests received from companies, including those
withdrawn before a written response is issued. These summaries and
questions will be posted on the Exchange's Web site so that the general
public, practitioners, and other companies can better understand how
the Exchange applies its rules and policies. In this way, the overall
need to request such interpretations is minimized, thus reducing
burdens on companies and staff alike.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ No fee would be charged in connection with requests
involving a company's initial listing application given that the
company will pay an application fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other Changes
    As part of the proposed rule change, the Exchange is deleting
portions of the Rule 4000 Series related to the listing and trading of
securities eligible to be listed on the BX Venture Market and
correcting cross-references to those deleted sections. The Exchange is
maintaining those provisions of the Rule 4000 applicable to securities
that will not be eligible to be listed on the BX Venture Market, such
as Portfolio Depository Receipts, Index Fund Shares, Trust Issued
Receipts, Securities Linked to the Performance of Indexes and
Commodities, and Managed Fund Shares, to enable the continued trading
of such securities on the Exchange pursuant to unlisted trading
privileges.
    The Exchange is deleting Rule 4430, which provided listing criteria
for limited partnership rollup transactions using language that was
substantially similar to language contained in FINRA Rule 2310.
Instead, the Exchange addresses these issues in proposed Rule 5210(h).
This rule adopts the same approach taken by Nasdaq and NYSE AMEX by
incorporating the FINRA rule by reference.\52\ In this manner, the
Exchange satisfies the requirement of Section 6(b)(9) of the Exchange
Act,\53\ which requires that the rules of a national securities
exchange prohibit certain limited partnership rollup transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ Nasdaq Rule 5210(h) and NYSE Amex Listed Company Guide
Section 126.
    \53\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is also moving the additional requirements applicable
to the listing of securities issued by NASDAQ OMX or its affiliates
from Rule 4370 to Rule 5701.

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\54\ in general and with
Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,\55\ in particular in that it is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. The proposed new listing
venue will advance these goals by allowing qualified issuers to list on
a transparent, well-regulated marketplace with increased transparency
about the trading of these securities, thereby protecting investors and
the public interest and helping to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \54\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \55\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed market is
consistent with Section 17B of the Act, which codifies Congress'
findings that it is in the public interest and appropriate for the
protection of investors and the maintenance of fair and orderly markets
to improve significantly the information available to brokers, dealers,
investors, and regulators with respect to quotations for and
transactions in penny stocks and that a fully implemented automated
quotation system for penny stocks would meet the information needs of
investors and market participants and would add visibility and
regulatory and surveillance data to that market. Section 17B further
instructs the Commission to facilitate the widespread dissemination of
reliable and accurate last sale and quotation information with respect
to penny stocks, as the Exchange will for securities listed on the BX
Venture Market, through one or more automated quotation systems
operated by a registered securities association or a national
securities exchange, providing reliable pricing information and
reporting of transactions.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Procedure: Request for Written Comments

    In the Order Instituting Proceedings, the Commission requested that
interested persons provide written submissions of their views, data and
arguments with respect to the issues identified above, as well as any
others they may have identified with the proposal. In particular, the
Commission invited the written views of interested persons concerning
whether the proposed rule change is inconsistent with Section 6(b)(5)
or any other provision of the Act, or the rules and regulations
thereunder. The Commission also stated that, although there do not
appear to be any issues relevant to approval or disapproval which would
be facilitated by an oral presentation of views, data, and arguments,
the Commission will consider, pursuant to Rule 19b-4, any request for
an opportunity to make an oral presentation.\56\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \56\ Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, as amended by the Securities
Acts Amendments of 1975, Public Law 94-29, 89 Stat. 97 (1975),
grants the Commission flexibility to determine what type of
proceeding--either oral or notice and opportunity for written
comments--is appropriate for consideration of a particular proposal
by a self-regulatory organization. See Securities Acts Amendments of
1975, Report of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban
Affairs to Accompany S. 249, S. Rep. No. 75, 94th Cong., 1st Sess.
30 (1975).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted in the Order Instituting Proceedings, interested persons
are invited to submit written data, views and arguments regarding
whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved by January 24,
2011.\57\ Any person who wishes to file a rebuttal to any other
person's submission must file that rebuttal by February 8, 2011.\58\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \57\ See Order Instituting Proceedings, supra note 4.
    \58\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the Order Instituting Proceedings, the Commission asked that
commenters address the merit of BX's statements in support of the
proposal, in addition to any other comments they may wish to submit
about the proposed rule change.\59\ The Commission also specifically
asked for comment on the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \59\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Do commenters agree with BX's belief that the proposed BX
listing market will provide a transparent, well-regulated marketplace
for companies with smaller market capitalization contemplating an
initial exchange listing and companies delisted from another national
securities exchange for failure to meet quantitative listing standards?
Why or why not?
     Is the proposed vetting and due diligence process of
prospective issuers on the BX listing market sufficient to prevent
companies that might erode investor confidence (due to potential fraud)
in the market from listing? Why or why not?
     Given that BX-listed companies are likely to be smaller
than listed companies on other exchanges, should BX undertake any
additional measures (including additional surveillances) to reduce the
risk of fraudulent and manipulative behavior with respect to the
listing and/or trading of BX-listed securities? Why or why not?
     Do commenters believe there is any likelihood of investor
confusion regarding the BX listing market? Would investors be inclined
to believe that a BX-listed company is listed on Nasdaq? Are the
Exchange's proposed actions to reduce or avoid investor confusion
sufficient? Why or why not? If not, what additional measures should the
Exchange undertake?
     Do the proposed initial and continued listing standards
for the BX listing market assure sufficient liquidity in listed
securities? Why or why not? Are there other listing criteria that
commenters would suggest to better assure sufficient liquidity in
listed securities?
     Are the proposed initial and continued listing standards
for the BX listing market sufficiently designed to reduce the risk that
an individual or small group of shareholders will be in a position to
manipulate the listed security? Why or why not?
     Are the proposed initial and continued listing standards
and the delisting process for the BX listing market sufficiently
designed to prevent stocks that are of a type that historically have
been prone to fraudulent schemes from being listed? Why or why not?
     Do commenters believe that the proposed delisting and
appeals procedures and timeframes are sufficient and appropriate? Are
the timeframes too long or too short? Why or why not?
     Are the proposed corporate governance standards for the BX
listing market sufficiently designed to assure an appropriate level of
corporate governance? Why or why not?
     Do commenters agree with the Exchange's belief that a BX
listing could help companies raise capital and thus promote job
creation within the United States? Why or why not?

     Has BX sufficiently addressed how quotations and
transactions reports relating to BX-listed securities will be
disseminated? Will this result in fragmentation of pricing information
relating to these securities? Will this undermine the ability of
investors to receive best execution? Why or why not?
    Comments may continue to be submitted by any of the following
methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BX-2010-059 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2010-059. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2010-059 and should be
submitted on or before January 24, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \60\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\60\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-32731 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7511-7513]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2926]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0038; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-153-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 Airplanes; and Model ERJ 190-100 STD, ERJ 190-
100 LR, ERJ 190-100 IGW, ERJ 190-200 STD, ERJ 190-200 LR, and ERJ 190-
200 IGW Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    [T]he occurrence of drill marks [has been found] at the lower
ring region of the rear pressure bulkhead between [the]
circumferential splice joint and rear skin located between stringers
12 and 13. These marks may result in formation of fatigue cracks
accelerated by corrosion reducing the structural strength of the
rear pressure bulkhead, which may cause a sudden decompression of
the passenger cabin.
* * * * *
    The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 28, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170--Putim--
12227-901 S[atilde]o Jose dos Campos--SP--BRASIL; telephone +55 12
3927-5852 or +55 12 3309-0732; fax +55 12 3927-7546; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.flyembraer.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone 425-
227-2768; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0038;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-153-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC),
which is the aviation authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian
Airworthiness Directives 2010-06-01R1 and 2010-06-02R1, both dated
August 25, 2010 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    [T]he occurrence of drill marks [has been found] at the lower
ring region of the rear pressure bulkhead between [the]
circumferential splice joint and rear skin located between stringers
12 and 13. These marks may result in formation of fatigue cracks
accelerated by corrosion reducing the structural strength of the
rear pressure bulkhead, which may cause a sudden decompression of
the passenger cabin.

    The required actions include doing a detailed inspection for signs
of drill marks and repairing if necessary. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    EMBRAER has issued Service Bulletins 170-53-0082 and 190-53-0042,
both Revision 01, both dated April 28, 2010. The actions described in
this service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe

condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of
the same type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 241 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $20,485, or $85 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 2 work-hours and require parts costing $20, for a cost of
$190 per product. We have no way of determining the number of products
that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA-
2011-0038; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-153-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by March 28, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170-100 LR, -100 STD, -100 SE, and -100 SU
airplanes; and Model ERJ 170-200 LR, -200 SU, and -200 STD
airplanes; certificated in any category; serial numbers 17000002,
17000004 through 17000013 inclusive, 17000015 through 17000212
inclusive, 17000216 through 17000233 inclusive, 17000236, 17000269,
17000281 through 17000291 inclusive, and 17000293; and Model ERJ
190-100 STD, ERJ 190-100 LR, ERJ 190-100 IGW, ERJ 190-200 STD, ERJ
190-200 LR, and ERJ 190-200 IGW airplanes; certificated in any
category; serial numbers 19000002, 19000004, 19000006 through
19000108 inclusive, 19000110 through 19000139 inclusive, 19000141
through 19000157 inclusive, 19000160, 19000165, 19000167 through
19000176 inclusive, 19000178 through 19000199 inclusive, 19000273
through 19000276 inclusive, 19000279 through 19000286 inclusive,
19000288 through 19000295 inclusive, 19000297 through 19000304
inclusive, and 19000309.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53:
Fuselage.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    [T]he occurrence of drill marks [has been found] at the lower
ring region of the rear pressure bulkhead between [the]
circumferential splice joint and rear skin located between stringers
12 and 13. These marks may result in formation of fatigue cracks
accelerated by corrosion reducing the structural strength of the
rear pressure bulkhead, which may cause a sudden decompression of
the passenger cabin.
* * * * *

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Actions

    (g) Before the accumulation of 20,000 flight cycles, do a
detailed inspection for signs of drill marks at the left and right
lower ring region of the rear pressure bulkhead between the
circumferential splice joint and rear skin between stringers 12 and
13, in accordance with EMBRAER Service Bulletin 170-53-0082 or 190-
53-0042, both Revision 01, both dated April 28, 2010, as applicable.
If drill marks are found, repair before further flight, in
accordance with EMBRAER Service Bulletin 170-53-0082 or 190-53-0042,
both Revision 01, both dated April 28, 2010, as applicable.

    Note 1:  For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: Although EMBRAER Service Bulletins 170-53-
0082 and 190-53-0042, both Revision 01, both dated April 28, 2010,
specify doing a

general visual inspection, this AD requires doing a detailed
inspection.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Cindy Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Information may be e-mailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

Related Information

    (i) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness Directives 2010-06-
01R1 and 2010-06-02R1, both dated August 25, 2010; and EMBRAER
Service Bulletins 170-53-0082 and 190-53-0042, both Revision 01,
both dated April 28, 2010; for related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 3, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-2926 Filed 2-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47723-47724]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19186]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket No. PHMSA-2013-0004]

Pipeline Safety: Information Collection Activities, Revision to
Gas Distribution Annual Report

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 28, 2014, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA) published a notice in the Federal Register (79 FR 23403) of its
intent to revise the gas distribution annual report (PHMSA F7100.1-1)
to improve the granularity of the data collected. In addition to making
several minor changes to the report, PHMSA will also request a new
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number for this
information collection.
    PHMSA received comments from one commenter in response to that
notice. PHMSA is publishing this notice to respond to the comments,
provide the public with an additional 30 days to comment on the
proposed revisions to the forms and the instructions and announce that
the revised information collection will be submitted to the OMB for
approval.

DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by September 15, 2014
to be assured of consideration.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Blaine Keener by telephone at 202-366-
0970, by fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the docket number
PHMSA-2013-0004 by any of the following methods:
     Fax: 1-202-395-5806.
     Mail: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA),
Records Management Center, Room 10102 NEOB, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503, ATTN: Desk Officer for the U.S. Department of
Transportation\PHMSA.
     Email: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB,
at the following email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Requests for a copy of the information collection should be
directed to Angela Dow by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, by fax at 202-366-
4566, by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail at U.S. Department of
Transportation, PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., PHP-30, Washington,
DC 20590-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Section 1320.8(d), Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations requires
PHMSA to provide interested members of the public and affected agencies
an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping
requests. This notice identifies a revised information collection
request that PHMSA will submit to OMB for approval. The information
collection is titled: ``Annual Report for Gas Distribution Pipeline
Operators'' (2137-0522).

Summary of Topic Comments/Responses

    During the two-month response period, PHMSA received comments on
the Gas Distribution Annual Report from the American Gas Association
(AGA).
    This notice responds to the comments, which may be found at http://www.regulations.gov, at docket number PHMSA-2013-0004. The docket also
contains the form and instructions as amended in response to the
comment. The AGA comments are summarized below and followed by the
PHMSA response.
    Comment: Under Part C, Cause of Leak, AGA proposes a new leak cause
category for operators to use in those instances when the leak is
eliminated by replacement and abandonment of the leaking pipe. AGA
indicates that operators prefer to indicate the cause of the leak and
avoid using ``other'' whenever possible for the reporting of a leak
cause, but it is difficult to determine the cause of a leak when a
pipeline is replaced in its entirety rather than making a repair.
    Response: PHMSA's instructions for the ``Other Cause'' category
encourage operators to use one of the specific categories whenever
possible. A ``Repair by Replacement'' category would provide no insight
into the cause of the leak. A single, non-specific category of ``Other
Cause'' is sufficient to capture the number of leaks for which the
operator cannot determine or assign the cause.
    Comment: Under Part D, Excavation Damage, AGA recommends an
additional root cause, ``Failure to Call.'' AGA believes that this is
different from ``One-Call Notification Practices Not Sufficient'' in
that this item covers insufficiencies of action between the call center
and the excavator. AGA believes it is critical to capture ``Failure to
Call'' as a separate excavation damage metric in order to attain future

enhancements to one-call laws. AGA also notes numbering errors in Part
D.
    Response: PHMSA believes that the proposed information on the
apparent root cause of excavation damages is adequate. The four
apparent root cause categories are those established by the
international Common Ground Alliance (CGA) in their Damage Information
and Reporting Tool (DIRT). In DIRT, and in the PHMSA incident and
accident reports, ``Failure to Call'' is one of three subcategories
under ``One-Call Notification Practices Not Sufficient.'' For
incidents, the additional level of detail is appropriate since there
are fewer reports. PHMSA intentionally chose to limit the reporting
burden for damages on the annual report by collecting the apparent root
cause at a ``higher'' level. It appears that AGA was reviewing a 2013
edition of the report when they noted errors in the Part D numbering.
The 2014 edition of the report in the docket has no numbering errors in
Part D.
    Comment: AGA recommended that Part H, Additional Information, which
allows operators to provide text explaining information submitted
elsewhere in the annual report, be retained.
    Response: It appears that AGA was reviewing a 2013 edition of the
report when they noted the proposal to eliminate Part H. The 2014
edition of the report in the docket does not propose the elimination of
Part H.
    Comment: AGA expressed concern about portions of the proposed
definition for ``Reconditioned Cast Iron.'' AGA also noted an error in
the instructions regarding where to describe ``other'' pipe materials.
    Response: PHMSA concurs with these comments. We revised the
definition of ``Reconditioned Cast Iron'' in line with AGA's comments.
We clarified where operators should enter the description of ``other''
pipe materials.
    Comment: Under Part C, Total Leaks And Hazardous Leaks Eliminated/
Repaired During The Year, AGA commented that the leak cause category
``Pipe, Weld Or Joint Failure'' may exclude certain items, such as
leaks on fittings. In addition, AGA commented that the new definition
seems to only cover installation errors due to force applied during
construction.
    Response: PHMSA proposes changing the ``Material or Weld'' category
name to ``Pipe, Weld Or Joint Failure'' to match the name used in the
gas distribution incident report. PHMSA concurs with AGA's comments
about fittings and installation errors. PHMSA has revised the
instructions for the leak cause category ``Pipe, Weld Or Joint
Failure'' accordingly.
    Comment: Under Part D, Excavation Damage, AGA recommends that PHMSA
should include damage to tracer wire in the description of excavation
damage. AGA notes that some operators are currently reporting tracer
wire damage to DIRT as excavation damage, but the annual report
instructions do not specify that tracer wire damages should be reported
as excavation damage.
    Response: PHMSA concurs with the recommendation and has revised the
instructions to include damage to tracer wire as excavation damage.

Proposed Information Collection Revisions and Request for Comments

    The following information is provided for each revised information
collection: (1) Title of the information collection; (2) OMB control
number; (3) Type of request; (4) Abstract of the information collection
activity; (5) Description of affected public; (6) Estimate of total
annual reporting and recordkeeping burden; and (7) Frequency of
collection. PHMSA will request a three-year term of approval for this
information collection activity.
    Title: Incident and Annual Reports for Gas Pipeline Operators.
    OMB Control Number: N/A.
    Current Expiration Date: N/A.
    Type of Request: Revision.
    Abstract: PHMSA is looking to revise the Gas Distribution Annual
Report (PHMSA F 7100.1-1) to make several minor changes related to data
collection.
    Affected Public: Gas distribution pipeline operators.
    Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:
    Total Annual Responses: 1,440.
    Total Annual Burden Hours: 23,040.
    Frequency of Collection: Annually.
    Comments are invited on:
    (a) The need for the proposed collection of information for the
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether
the information will have practical utility;
    (b) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
    (c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
    (d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques.

    Issued in Washington, DC on August 6, 2014.
Jeffrey D. Wiese,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2014-19186 Filed 8-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register: December 28, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 248)]
[Notices]
[Page 76793]
[DOCID:fr28de05-75]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-145-000]

Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in
FERC Gas Tariff

December 20, 2005.
    Take notice that on December 15, 2005, Columbia Gulf Transmission
Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on
Appendix A to the filing, bearing a proposed effective date of January
14, 2006.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Sec.  154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone
filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on
the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before
the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-7929 Filed 12-27-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P