[Federal Register: January 4, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 2)]
[Notices]
[Page 341-342]
[DOCID:fr04ja07-36]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No.: P-906-006]

Virginia Electric and Power Company; Notice of Application Ready
for Environmental Analysis and Soliciting Comments, Recommendations,
Terms and Conditions, and Prescriptions

December 26, 2006.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: New Major License.
    b. Project No.: P-906-006.
    c. Date filed: June 12, 2006.
    d. Applicant: Virginia Electric and Power Company, doing business
as Dominion Virginia Power.
    e. Name of Project: Cushaw Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the James River in near Glasgow, Virginia, in
Bedford and Amherst Counties, Virginia. The project occupies 4.1 acres
of United States Forest Service lands.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: James Thornton, Dominion Virginia Power, 5000
Dominion Boulevard, 1 NE, Glen Allen, VA 23060<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Kristen Murphy,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    j. Deadline for filing comments, recommendations, terms and
conditions, and prescriptions: February 24, 2007; reply comments are
due: April 10, 2007.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    Comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, and prescriptions
may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. The
Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web

site (http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.

    k. This application has been accepted, and is ready for
environmental analysis at this time.
    l. Description of Project: The Cushaw Project consists of the
following: (1) A 1,550-foot-long and 27-foot-high reinforced concrete
dam extending diagonally across the James River; (2) a 138-acre
reservoir with a surface elevation of 656 feet mean sea level; (3) an
integral powerhouse with the dam containing five generating units with
a total installed capacity of 7,500 kilowatts; (4) a 2.3-kVcable
connecting the powerhouse to the Cushaw substation; and (5) appurtenant
facilities. The project is operated in a run-of-river mode, and the
average annual electrical generation is approximately 16,971,000
kilowatthours.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''

link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-
866-208-3676, or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is also available for
inspection and reproduction at the address in item h above.
    All filings must (1) bear in all capital letters the title
``COMMENTS'', ``REPLY COMMENTS'', ``RECOMMENDATIONS,'' ``TERMS AND
CONDITIONS,'' or ``PRESCRIPTIONS;'' (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person submitting the filing; and (4) otherwise comply
with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, recommendations, terms and conditions or prescriptions must
set forth their evidentiary basis and otherwise comply with the
requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may obtain copies of the
application directly from the applicant. Each filing must be
accompanied by proof of service on all persons listed on the service
list prepared by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with
18 CFR 4.34(b), and 385.2010.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp
 to be notified via e-mail of new filings and

issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.
    n. A license applicant must file no later than 60 days following
the date of issuance of this notice: (1) A copy of the water quality
certification; (2) a copy of the request for certification, including
proof of the date on which the certifying agency received the request;
or (3) evidence of waiver of water quality certification.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-22525 Filed 1-3-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 135 (Tuesday, July 14, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42466-42474]
[FR Doc No: 2020-15104]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 33922; 812-14909]

OFS Capital Corp., et al.

July 8, 2020.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of application for an order under sections 17(d) and 57(i)
of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') and rule 17d-1
under the Act to permit certain joint transactions otherwise prohibited
by sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act.

Summary of Application: Applicants request an order to permit business
development companies (``BDCs'') and closed-end management investment
companies to co-invest in portfolio companies with each other and with
certain affiliated investment funds and accounts.

Applicants: OFS Capital Corporation (``OFS BDC''), Hancock Park
Corporate Income, Inc. (``Hancock BDC''), OFS Credit Company, Inc.
(``OFS Credit''), CIM Real Assets & Credit Fund (``CIM RACR''), LFTW-
OFS, Inc., MAC-OFS Holdings, LLC, Convene Holdings LLC, DRSOFSCC, Inc.,
PB-OFSC, Inc., OFSCC-CR, LLC, OFSCC-FS Holdings, LLC, OFSCC-FS, LLC,
OFSCC-MB, Inc., OFSCC-TTG, LLC, OFSCC-TS, LLC, OFS SBIC I LP, LFTW-
HPCI, Inc., DRS-HPCI, Inc., HPCI-CR, LLC, HPCI-MB, Inc., HPCITTG, LLC,
OFS Capital Management, LLC (``OFS Adviser''), OFS CLO Management, LLC
(``OFS CLO Adviser''), OFSI Fund V, LTD., OFSI Fund VI, LTD., OFSI Fund
VII, LTD., OFSI BSL VIII, LTD., OFSI BSL IX, LTD., Orchard First Source
Asset Management, LLC (``OFSAM''), OFS Funding I, LLC, CIM Capital, LLC
(``CIM Capital Advisor''), CIM Capital IC Management, LLC (``CIM IC
Advisor''), CIM Capital SA Management, LLC (``CIMSA''), CIM Urban Real
Estate Fund, L.P., CIM Urban REIT, LLC, CIM Fund III, L.P., CIM
Infrastructure Fund, L.P., CIM VI (Urban REIT), LLC, CIM Fund VIII,
L.P., CIM Infrastructure Fund II, L.P., CIM Urban Income Investments,
L.P., CMMT Partners, L.P., CIM Fund IX, L.P., CIM Income NAV
Management, LLC, CIM Real Estate Finance Management, LLC, Cole REIT
Management V, LLC, Cole Corporate Income Management II, LLC, Cole
Corporate Income Management III, LLC, CIM Income NAV, Inc., CIM Real
Estate Finance Trust, Inc., Cole Credit Property Trust V, Inc., Cole
Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT II), Inc., and Cole Office & Industrial
REIT (CCIT III), Inc.

Filing Dates: The application was filed on May 23, 2018, and amended on
September 18, 2019, December 31, 2019, April 3, 2020 and June 29, 2020.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by emailing the Commission's
Secretary at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and serving applicants with a
copy of the request by email. Hearing requests should be received by
the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on August 3, 2020, and should be
accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to rule
0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the nature of the
writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing
on the matter, the reason for the request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification
by emailing the Commission's Secretary at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Applicants: Tod K. Reichert, OFS Capital
Management, LLC<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Mukya Porter, CIM Group,
LLC<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer O. Palmer, Senior Counsel, at
(303) 844-1012, or David J. Marcinkus, Branch Chief, at<PHONE_NUMBER>
(Chief Counsel's Office, Division of Investment Management).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's website by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Introduction

    1. The Applicants request an order of the Commission under Sections
17(d) and 57(i) and Rule 17d-1 thereunder (the ``Order'') to permit,
subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the application (the
``Conditions''), one or more Regulated Funds \1\ and/or one or more
Affiliated Funds \2\ to enter into Co-Investment Transactions with each
other. ``Co-Investment Transaction'' means any transaction in which one
or more Regulated Funds (or its Wholly-Owned Investment Sub, defined
below) participated together with one or more Affiliated Funds and/or
one or more other Regulated Funds in reliance on the Order. ``Potential
Co-Investment Transaction'' means any investment opportunity in which a
Regulated Fund (or its Wholly-Owned Investment Sub) could not
participate together with one or more Affiliated Funds and/or one or
more other Regulated Funds without obtaining and relying on the
Order.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ ``Regulated Funds'' means CIM RACR, OFS BDC, Hancock BDC and
OFS Credit (the ``Existing Regulated Funds'') and any Future
Regulated Funds. ``Future Regulated Fund'' means a closed-end
management investment company (a) that is registered under the Act
or has elected to be regulated as a BDC, (b) whose investment
adviser (and sub-adviser(s), if any) is an Adviser, and (c) that
intends to participate in the program of co-investment described in
the application.
    ``Adviser'' means any Existing Adviser and any Future Adviser.
``Existing Adviser'' means CIMSA, OFS Adviser, OFS CLO Adviser, CIM
Capital Advisor and CIM IC Advisor. ``Future Adviser'' means any
investment adviser that in the future (i) controls, is controlled by
or is under common control with OFSAM, CIM Capital Advisor, CIM IC
Advisor or CIMSA, (ii) (a) is registered as an investment adviser
under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the ``Advisers Act'') or
(b) is a relying adviser of an investment adviser that is registered
under the Advisers Act and that controls, is controlled by or is
under common control with OFSAM, CIM Capital Advisor, CIM IC Advisor
or CIMSA, and (iii) is not a Regulated Fund or a subsidiary of a
Regulated Fund.
    \2\ ``Affiliated Fund'' means any Existing Affiliated Fund
(defined below) or any Future Affiliated Fund. ``Future Affiliated
Fund'' means an entity (a) whose investment adviser or sub-adviser
is an Adviser, (b)(i)(x) that would be an investment company but for
Section 3(c)(1), 3(c)(5)(C) or 3(c)(7) of the Act or (y) relies on
Rule 3a-7 under the Act, or (ii) that does not meet the definition
of investment company under the Act and qualifies as a REIT within
the meaning of Section 856 of the Code because substantially all of
its assets would consist of real properties, and (c) that intends to
participate in the program of co-investment described in the
application; provided that an entity sub-advised by an Adviser is
not included in this term with respect to such Affiliated Fund if:
(i) Such Adviser serving as sub-adviser does not control the entity,
and (ii) the primary investment adviser is not an Adviser.
    \3\ All existing entities that currently intend to rely on the
Order have been named as Applicants and any existing or future
entities that may rely on the Order in the future will comply with
the terms and Conditions set forth in the application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Applicants

    2. OFS BDC, a Delaware corporation, and Hancock BDC, a Maryland
corporation, have elected to be regulated as business development
companies

(``BDCs'') under the Act.\4\ OFS Credit, a Delaware corporation, and
CIM RACR, a Delaware statutory trust, are closed-end management
investment companies registered as investment companies under the Act.
The Board \5\ of each of these Existing Regulated Funds will be
comprised of a majority of members who are Independent Directors.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Section 2(a)(48) defines a BDC to be any closed-end
investment company that operates for the purpose of making
investments in securities described in Section 55(a)(1) through
55(a)(3) and makes available significant managerial assistance with
respect to the issuers of such securities.
    \5\ ``Board'' means the board of directors (or the equivalent)
of a Regulated Fund.
    \6\ ``Independent Director'' means a member of the Board of any
relevant entity who is not an ``interested person'' as defined in
Section 2(a)(19) of the Act. No Independent Director of a Regulated
Fund will have a financial interest in any Co-Investment
Transaction, other than indirectly through share ownership in one of
the Regulated Funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. OFS Adviser serves as investment adviser to OFS BDC, Hancock BDC
and OFS Credit. CIM IC Advisor is responsible for the overall
management of CIM RACR and has engaged CIMSA and OFS Adviser to serve
as investment sub-advisers to CIM RACR. Each of OFS Adviser, CIM IC
Advisor and CIMSA is a Delaware limited liability company that is
registered under the Advisers Act.
    4. The Existing Affiliated Funds are the Existing OFS Proprietary
Accounts, Existing OFS Affiliated Funds, Existing CIM Funds and
Existing Cole Funds. The Existing OFS Proprietary Accounts, OFSAM and
its subsidiary OFS Funding I, LLC, hold various financial assets in a
principal capacity. The Existing OFS Affiliated Funds, Existing CIM
Funds and Existing Cole Funds are identified in Appendices A, B and C,
respectively, to the application. Applicants represent that each
Existing Affiliated Fund is a separate and distinct legal entity and
each: (i) Would be an investment company but for Section 3(c)(1),
3(c)(5)(C) or 3(c)(7) of the Act; (ii) relies on Rule 3a-7 under the
Act; or (iii) does not meet the definition of investment company under
the Act and qualifies as a real estate investment trust (``REIT'')
within the meaning of Section 856 of the Internal Revenue Code (the
``Code'') because substantially all of its assets would consist of real
properties. Certain of the Existing Advisers serve as investment
advisers to the Existing OFS Affiliated Funds and Existing CIM Funds.
Each Existing Cole Fund will engage an Adviser to serve as investment
adviser and/or sub-adviser with respect to any securities that would be
subject to the Order.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The current advisers to the Existing Cole Funds, identified
in Appendix C to the application, are not Advisers, will not source
Potential Co-Investment Transactions under the required Order and
are only deemed to be Advisers for purposes of Conditions 2(c)(iv),
13 and 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. Each of the Applicants may be deemed to be directly or
indirectly controlled by Orchard Investments III, LLC (``OI3''), a
Delaware limited liability company. Applicants state that OI3 is a
holding company and does not currently offer investment advisory
services to any person and is not expected to do so in the future.
Applicants state that, as a result, OI3 has not been included as an
Applicant.
    6. Applicants state that a Regulated Fund may, from time to time,
form one or more Wholly-Owned Investment Subs.\8\ Such a subsidiary may
be prohibited from investing in a Co-Investment Transaction with a
Regulated Fund (other than its parent) or any Affiliated Fund because
it would be a company controlled by its parent Regulated Fund for
purposes of Section 57(a)(4) and Rule 17d-1. Applicants request that
each Wholly-Owned Investment Sub be permitted to participate in Co-
Investment Transactions in lieu of the Regulated Fund that owns it and
that the Wholly-Owned Investment Sub's participation in any such
transaction be treated, for purposes of the Order, as though the parent
Regulated Fund were participating directly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ ``Wholly-Owned Investment Sub'' means an entity (i) that is
wholly-owned by a Regulated Fund (with such Regulated Fund at all
times holding, beneficially and of record, directly or indirectly,
95% or more of the voting and economic interests); (ii) whose sole
business purpose is to hold one or more investments on behalf of
such Regulated Fund (and, in the case of a SBIC Subsidiary (defined
below), maintain a license under the SBA Act (defined below) and
issue debentures guaranteed by the SBA (defined below)); (iii) with
respect to which such Regulated Fund's Board has the sole authority
to make all determinations with respect to the entity's
participation under the Conditions; and (iv)(A) that would be an
investment company but for Section 3(c)(1), 3(c)(5)(C), or 3(c)(7)
of the Act, (B) relies on Rule 3a-7 under the Act, or (C) qualifies
as a REIT within the meaning of Section 856 of the Code because
substantially all of its assets would consist of real properties.
``SBIC Subsidiary'' means a Wholly-Owned Investment Sub that is
licensed by the Small Business Administration (the ``SBA'') to
operate under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended,
(the ``SBA Act'') as a small business investment company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Applicants' Representations

A. Allocation Process

    7. Applicants state that the Advisers are presented with thousands
of investment opportunities each year on behalf of their clients and
the Advisers must determine how to allocate those opportunities in a
manner that, over time, is fair and equitable to all of their clients.
Such investment opportunities may be Potential Co-Investment
Transactions.
    8. Applicants represent that the Existing Advisers have
established, and each Future Adviser will establish, processes for
allocating initial investment opportunities, opportunities for
subsequent investments in an issuer and dispositions of securities
holdings reasonably designed to treat all clients fairly and equitably.
Further, Applicants represent that these processes will be extended and
modified in a manner reasonably designed to ensure that the additional
transactions permitted under the Order will both (i) be fair and
equitable to the Regulated Funds and the Affiliated Funds and (ii)
comply with the Conditions.
    9. Specifically, applicants state that the Advisers are organized
and managed such that the portfolio managers and investment teams
responsible for evaluating investment opportunities and making
investment decisions on behalf of clients are promptly notified of the
opportunities. If the requested Order is granted, the Advisers will
establish, maintain and implement policies and procedures reasonably
designed to ensure that, when such opportunities arise, the Advisers to
the relevant Regulated Funds are promptly notified and receive the same
information about the opportunity as any other Advisers considering the
opportunity for their clients. In particular, consistent with Condition
1, if a Potential Co-Investment Transaction falls within the then-
current Objectives and Strategies \9\ and any Board-Established
Criteria \10\ of

a Regulated Fund, the policies and procedures will require that the
relevant portfolio managers, investment teams and/or investment
committees responsible for that Regulated Fund receive sufficient
information to allow the Regulated Fund's Adviser to make its
independent determination and recommendations under the Conditions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ ``Objectives and Strategies'' means a Regulated Fund's
investment objectives and strategies, as described in its most
current registration statement on Form N-2, other current filings
with the Commission under the Securities Act of 1933 (the
``Securities Act'') or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and its most current report to stockholders.
    \10\ ``Board-Established Criteria'' means criteria that the
Board of a Regulated Fund may establish from time to time to
describe the characteristics of Potential Co-Investment Transactions
regarding which the Adviser to the Regulated Fund should be notified
under Condition 1. The Board-Established Criteria will be consistent
with the Regulated Fund's Objectives and Strategies. If no Board-
Established Criteria are in effect, then the applicable Regulated
Fund's Adviser(s) will be notified of all Potential Co-Investment
Transactions that fall within the Regulated Fund's then-current
Objectives and Strategies. Board-Established Criteria will be
objective and testable, meaning that they will be based on
observable information, such as industry/sector of the issuer,
minimum EBITDA of the issuer, asset class of the investment
opportunity or required commitment size, and not on characteristics
that involve a discretionary assessment. The Adviser(s) to the
Regulated Fund may from time to time recommend criteria for the
Board's consideration, but Board-Established Criteria will only
become effective if approved by a majority of the Independent
Directors. The Independent Directors of a Regulated Fund may at any
time rescind, suspend or qualify its approval of any Board-
Established Criteria, though Applicants anticipate that, under
normal circumstances, the Board would not modify these criteria more
often than quarterly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    10. The Adviser to each applicable Regulated Fund will then make an
independent determination of the appropriateness of the investment for
the Regulated Fund in light of the Regulated Fund's then-current
circumstances. If the Adviser to a Regulated Fund deems the Regulated
Fund's participation in such Potential Co-Investment Transaction to be
appropriate, then it will formulate a recommendation regarding the
proposed order amount for the Regulated Fund.
    11. Applicants state that, for each Regulated Fund and Affiliated
Fund whose Adviser recommends participating in a Potential Co-
Investment Transaction, the Adviser will submit a proposed order amount
to an allocation committee on which senior management and legal or
compliance personnel participate. Applicants state further that, at
this stage, each proposed order amount may be reviewed and adjusted, in
accordance with the Advisers' written allocation policies and
procedures.\11\ The order of a Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund
resulting from this process is referred to as its ``Internal Order.''
The Internal Order will be submitted for approval by the Required
Majority of any participating Regulated Funds in accordance with the
Conditions.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The reason for any such adjustment to a proposed order
amount will be documented in writing and preserved in the records of
the Advisers.
    \12\ ``Required Majority'' means a required majority, as defined
in Section 57(o) of the Act. In the case of a Regulated Fund that is
a registered closed-end fund, the Board members that make up the
Required Majority will be determined as if the Regulated Fund were a
BDC subject to Section 57(o).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    12. If the aggregate Internal Orders for a Potential Co-Investment
Transaction do not exceed the size of the investment opportunity
immediately prior to the submission of the orders to the underwriter,
broker, dealer or issuer, as applicable (the ``External Submission''),
then each Internal Order will be placed with the expectation that it
will be fulfilled as placed. If, on the other hand, the aggregate
Internal Orders for a Potential Co-Investment Transaction exceed the
size of the investment opportunity immediately prior to the External
Submission, then the allocation of the opportunity will be made pro
rata on the basis of the size of the Internal Orders.\13\ If,
subsequent to such External Submission, the size of the opportunity is
increased or decreased, or if the terms of such opportunity, or the
facts and circumstances applicable to the Regulated Funds' or the
Affiliated Funds' consideration of the opportunity, change, the
participants will be permitted to submit revised Internal Orders in
accordance with written allocation policies and procedures that the
Advisers will establish, implement and maintain.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The Advisers will maintain records of all proposed order
amounts, Internal Orders and External Submissions in conjunction
with Potential Co-Investment Transactions. Each applicable Adviser
will provide the Eligible Directors with information concerning the
Affiliated Funds' and Regulated Funds' order sizes to assist the
Eligible Directors with their review of the applicable Regulated
Fund's investments for compliance with the Conditions. ``Eligible
Directors'' means, with respect to a Regulated Fund and a Potential
Co-Investment Transaction, the members of the Regulated Fund's Board
eligible to vote on that Potential Co-Investment Transaction under
Section 57(o) of the Act.
    \14\ The Board of the Regulated Fund will then either approve or
disapprove of the investment opportunity in accordance with
condition 2, 6, 7, 8 or 9, as applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Follow-On Investments

    13. Applicants state that from time to time the Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds may have opportunities to make Follow-On Investments
\15\ in an issuer in which a Regulated Fund and one or more other
Regulated Funds and/or Affiliated Funds previously have invested.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ ``Follow-On Investment'' means an additional investment in
the same issuer, including, but not limited to, through the exercise
of warrants, conversion privileges or other rights to purchase
securities of the issuer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    14. Applicants propose that Follow-On Investments would be divided
into two categories depending on whether the prior investment was a Co-
Investment Transaction or a Pre-Boarding Investment.\16\ If the
Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds had previously participated in a
Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer, then the terms
and approval of the Follow-On Investment would be subject to the
Standard Review Follow-Ons described in Condition 8. If the Regulated
Funds and Affiliated Funds have not previously participated in a Co-
Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer but hold a Pre-
Boarding Investment, then the terms and approval of the Follow-On
Investment would be subject to the Enhanced-Review Follow-Ons described
in Condition 9. All Enhanced Review Follow-Ons require the approval of
the Required Majority. For a given issuer, the participating Regulated
Funds and Affiliated Funds would need to comply with the requirements
of Enhanced-Review Follow-Ons only for the first Co-Investment
Transaction. Subsequent Co-Investment Transactions with respect to the
issuer would be governed by the requirements of Standard Review Follow-
Ons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ ``Pre-Boarding Investments'' are investments in an issuer
held by a Regulated Fund as well as one or more Affiliated Funds
and/or one or more other Regulated Funds that were acquired prior to
participating in any Co-Investment Transaction: (i) In transactions
in which the only term negotiated by or on behalf of such funds was
price in reliance on one of the JT No-Action Letters (defined
below); or (ii) in transactions occurring at least 90 days apart and
without coordination between the Regulated Fund and any Affiliated
Fund or other Regulated Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    15. A Regulated Fund would be permitted to invest in Standard
Review Follow-Ons either with the approval of the Required Majority
under Condition 8(c) or without Board approval under Condition 8(b) if
it is (i) a Pro Rata Follow-On Investment \17\ or (ii) a Non-Negotiated
Follow-On Investment.\18\ Applicants believe that these Pro Rata and
Non-Negotiated Follow-On Investments do not present a significant
opportunity for overreaching on the part of any Adviser and thus do not
warrant the time or the attention of the Board. Pro Rata Follow-On
Investments and Non-Negotiated Follow-On Investments remain subject to
the Board's periodic review in accordance with Condition 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ A ``Pro Rata Follow-On Investment'' is a Follow-On
Investment (i) in which the participation of each Affiliated Fund
and each Regulated Fund is proportionate to its outstanding
investments in the issuer or security, as appropriate, immediately
preceding the Follow-On Investment, and (ii) in the case of a
Regulated Fund, a majority of the Board has approved the Regulated
Fund's participation in the pro rata Follow-On Investments as being
in the best interests of the Regulated Fund. The Regulated Fund's
Board may refuse to approve, or at any time rescind, suspend or
qualify, its approval of Pro Rata Follow-On Investments, in which
case all subsequent Follow-On Investments will be submitted to the
Regulated Fund's Eligible Directors in accordance with Condition
8(c).
    \18\ A ``Non-Negotiated Follow-On Investment'' is a Follow-On
Investment in which a Regulated Fund participates together with one
or more Affiliated Funds and/or one or more other Regulated Funds
(i) in which the only term negotiated by or on behalf of the funds
is price and (ii) with respect to which, if the transaction were
considered on its own, the funds would be entitled to rely on one of
the JT No-Action Letters. ``JT No-Action Letters'' means SMC
Capital, Inc., SEC No-Action Letter (pub. avail. Sept. 5, 1995) and
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, SEC No-Action Letter
(pub. avail. June 7, 2000).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Dispositions

    16. Applicants propose that Dispositions \19\ would be divided into
two categories. If the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds holding
investments in the issuer had previously participated in a Co-
Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer, then the terms and
approval of the Disposition would be subject to the Standard Review
Dispositions described in Condition 6. If the Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds have not previously participated in a Co-Investment
Transaction with respect to the issuer but hold a Pre-Boarding
Investment, then the terms and approval of the Disposition would be
subject to the Enhanced Review Dispositions described in Condition 7.
Subsequent Dispositions with respect to the same issuer would be
governed by Condition 6 under the Standard Review Dispositions.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ ``Disposition'' means the sale, exchange or other
disposition of an interest in a security of an issuer.
    \20\ However, with respect to an issuer, if a Regulated Fund's
first Co-Investment Transaction is an Enhanced Review Disposition,
and the Regulated Fund does not dispose of its entire position in
the Enhanced Review Disposition, then before such Regulated Fund may
complete its first Standard Review Follow-On in such issuer, the
Eligible Directors must review the proposed Follow-On Investment not
only on a stand-alone basis but also in relation to the total
economic exposure in such issuer (i.e., in combination with the
portion of the Pre-Boarding Investment not disposed of in the
Enhanced Review Disposition), and the other terms of the
investments. This additional review would be required because such
findings would not have been required in connection with the prior
Enhanced Review Disposition, but they would have been required had
the first Co-Investment Transaction been an Enhanced Review Follow-
On.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    17. A Regulated Fund may participate in a Standard Review
Disposition either with the approval of the Required Majority under
Condition 6(d) or without Board approval under Condition 6(c) if (i)
the Disposition is a Pro Rata Disposition \21\ or (ii) the securities
are Tradable Securities \22\ and the Disposition meets the other
requirements of Condition 6(c)(ii). Pro Rata Dispositions and
Dispositions of a Tradable Security remain subject to the Board's
periodic review in accordance with Condition 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ A ``Pro Rata Disposition'' is a Disposition (i) in which
the participation of each Affiliated Fund and each Regulated Fund is
proportionate to its outstanding investment in the security subject
to Disposition immediately preceding the Disposition; and (ii) in
the case of a Regulated Fund, a majority of the Board has approved
the Regulated Fund's participation in pro rata Dispositions as being
in the best interests of the Regulated Fund. The Regulated Fund's
Board may refuse to approve, or at any time rescind, suspend or
qualify, its approval of Pro Rata Dispositions, in which case all
subsequent Dispositions will be submitted to the Regulated Fund's
Eligible Directors.
    \22\ ``Tradable Security'' means a security that meets the
following criteria at the time of Disposition: (i) It trades on a
national securities exchange or designated offshore securities
market as defined in rule 902(b) under the Securities Act; (ii) it
is not subject to restrictive agreements with the issuer or other
security holders; and (iii) it trades with sufficient volume and
liquidity (findings as to which are documented by the Advisers to
any Regulated Funds holding investments in the issuer and retained
for the life of the Regulated Fund) to allow each Regulated Fund to
dispose of its entire position remaining after the proposed
Disposition within a short period of time not exceeding 30 days at
approximately the value (as defined by section 2(a)(41) of the Act)
at which the Regulated Fund has valued the investment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Delayed Settlement

    18. Applicants represent that under the terms and Conditions of the
application, all Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds participating in
a Co-Investment Transaction will invest at the same time, for the same
price and with the same terms, conditions, class, registration rights
and any other rights, so that none of them receives terms more
favorable than any other. However, the settlement date for an
Affiliated Fund in a Co-Investment Transaction may occur up to ten
business days after the settlement date for the Regulated Fund, and
vice versa. Nevertheless, in all cases, (i) the date on which the
commitment of the Affiliated Funds and Regulated Funds is made will be
the same even where the settlement date is not and (ii) the earliest
settlement date and the latest settlement date of any Affiliated Fund
or Regulated Fund participating in the transaction will occur within
ten business days of each other.

E. Holders

    19. Under Condition 15, if an Adviser, its principals, or any
person controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the
Adviser or its principals, and the Affiliated Funds (collectively, the
``Holders'') own in the aggregate more than 25 percent of the
outstanding voting shares of a Regulated Fund (the ``Shares''), then
the Holders will vote such Shares as directed by an independent third
party when voting on matters specified in the Condition. Applicants
believe that this Condition will ensure that the Independent Directors
will act independently in evaluating Co-Investment Transactions,
because the ability of the Adviser or its principals to influence the
Independent Directors by a suggestion, explicit or implied, that the
Independent Directors can be removed will be limited significantly. The
Independent Directors shall evaluate and approve any independent party,
taking into account its qualifications, reputation for independence,
cost to the shareholders, and other factors that they deem relevant.

Applicants' Legal Analysis

    1. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act prohibit
participation by a registered investment company and an affiliated
person in any ``joint enterprise or other joint arrangement or profit-
sharing plan,'' as defined in the rule, without prior approval by the
Commission by order upon application. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule
17d-1 under the Act are applicable to Regulated Funds that are
registered closed-end investment companies.
    2. Similarly, with regard to BDCs, section 57(a)(4) of the Act
generally prohibits certain persons specified in section 57(b) from
participating in joint transactions with the BDC or a company
controlled by the BDC in contravention of rules as prescribed by the
Commission. Section 57(i) of the Act provides that, until the
Commission prescribes rules under section 57(a)(4), the Commission's
rules under section 17(d) of the Act applicable to registered closed-
end investment companies will be deemed to apply to transactions
subject to section 57(a)(4). Because the Commission has not adopted any
rules under section 57(a)(4), rule 17d-1 also applies to joint
transactions with Regulated Funds that are BDCs.
    3. Co-Investment Transactions are prohibited by either or both of
Rule 17d-1 and Section 57(a)(4) without a prior exemptive order of the
Commission to the extent that the Affiliated Funds and the Regulated
Funds participating in such transactions fall within the category of
persons described by Rule 17d-1 and/or Section 57(b), as applicable,
vis-[agrave]-vis each participating Regulated Fund. Each of the
participating Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds may be deemed to be
affiliated persons vis-[agrave]-vis a Regulated Fund within the meaning
of section 2(a)(3) by reason of common control because: (i) OFS Adviser
serves as the Adviser to and may be deemed to control each of OFS BDC,
Hancock BDC, and OFS Credit; (ii) CIM IC Advisor may be deemed to
control CIM RACR because it will serve as the Adviser to CIM RACR;
(iii) each of OFS Adviser and CIMSA may be deemed to control CIM RACR
because they will serve as sub-advisers to CIM RACR; (iii) OFS Adviser
manages and may be deemed to control the Affiliated Funds for which it
currently serves as investment adviser; (iv) OFS CLO Adviser manages
and may be deemed to control the Affiliated

Funds that it manages; (v) CIM Capital Advisor manages and may be
deemed to control the Affiliated Funds for which it serves as
investment adviser; (vi) an Adviser will serve as investment adviser
(and sub-adviser, if any) to, and will be deemed to control, any Cole
Fund that relies on the Order; (vii) an Adviser will serve as
investment adviser (and sub-adviser, if any) to, and will be deemed to
control, any Future Regulated Fund or Future Affiliated Fund; and
(viii) the Existing Advisers are all under common control, any Future
Advisers will be under common control with the Existing Advisers and
CIM IC Advisor is under common control with the Advisers. Thus, each
Regulated Fund and each Affiliated Fund may be deemed to be a person
related to a Regulated Fund in a manner described by Section 57(b) and
Rule 17d-1, as applicable; and therefore the prohibitions of Rule 17d-1
and Section 57(a)(4) would apply respectively to prohibit the Regulated
Funds and Affiliated Funds from participating in Co-Investment
Transactions with the Regulated Funds.
    4. Further, because the Wholly-Owned Investment Subs are controlled
by the Regulated Funds, the Wholly-Owned Investment Subs are subject to
Section 57(a)(4) (or Section 17(d) in the case of Wholly-Owned
Investment Subs controlled by Regulated Funds that are registered under
the Act), and thus also subject to the provisions of Rule 17d-1, and
therefore would be prohibited from participating in Co-Investment
Transactions.
    5. In addition, because the OFS Proprietary Accounts are controlled
by OFSAM, which is the parent company of OFS Adviser and OFS CLO
Adviser and, therefore, are under common control with the Regulated
Funds, the OFS Proprietary Accounts could be deemed to be persons
related to the Regulated Funds (or a company controlled by the
Regulated Funds) in a manner described by Section 57(b) and also
prohibited from participating in the program of co-investment described
in the application.
    6. In passing upon applications under rule 17d-1, the Commission
considers whether the company's participation in the joint transaction
is consistent with the provisions, policies, and purposes of the Act
and the extent to which such participation is on a basis different from
or less advantageous than that of other participants.
    7. Applicants state that in the absence of the requested relief, in
many circumstances the Regulated Funds would be limited in their
ability to participate in attractive and appropriate investment
opportunities. Applicants state that, as required by Rule 17d-1(b), the
Conditions ensure that the terms on which Co-Investment Transactions
may be made will be consistent with the participation of the Regulated
Funds being on a basis that it is neither different from nor less
advantageous than other participants, thus protecting the equity
holders of any participant from being disadvantaged. Applicants further
state that the Conditions ensure that all Co-Investment Transactions
are reasonable and fair to the Regulated Funds and their shareholders
and do not involve overreaching by any person concerned, including the
Advisers. Applicants state that the Regulated Funds' participation in
the Co-Investment Transactions in accordance with the Conditions will
be consistent with the provisions, policies, and purposes of the Act
and would be done in a manner that is not different from, or less
advantageous than, that of other participants.

Applicants' Conditions

    Applicants agree that the Order will be subject to the following
Conditions:
    1. Identification and Referral of Potential Co-Investment
Transactions.
    (a) The Advisers will establish, maintain and implement policies
and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that each Adviser is
promptly notified of all Potential Co-Investment Transactions that fall
within the then-current Objectives and Strategies and Board-Established
Criteria of any Regulated Fund such Adviser manages.
    (b) When an Adviser to a Regulated Fund is notified of a Potential
Co-Investment Transaction under Condition 1(a), it will make an
independent determination of the appropriateness of the investment for
the Regulated Fund in light of the Regulated Fund's then-current
circumstances.
    2. Board Approvals of Co-Investment Transactions.
    (a) If the Adviser deems a Regulated Fund's participation in any
Potential Co-Investment Transaction to be appropriate for the Regulated
Fund, it will then determine an appropriate level of investment for the
Regulated Fund.
    (b) If the aggregate amount recommended by the Advisers to be
invested in the Potential Co-Investment Transaction by the
participating Regulated Funds and any participating Affiliated Funds,
collectively, exceeds the amount of the investment opportunity, the
investment opportunity will be allocated among them pro rata based on
the size of the Internal Orders, as described in Section III.A.1.b. of
the application. Each Adviser to a participating Regulated Fund will
promptly notify and provide the Eligible Directors with information
concerning the Affiliated Funds' and Regulated Funds' order sizes to
assist the Eligible Directors with their review of the applicable
Regulated Fund's investments for compliance with these Conditions.
    (c) After making the determinations required in Condition 1(b)
above, each Adviser to a participating Regulated Fund will distribute
written information concerning the Potential Co-Investment Transaction
(including the amount proposed to be invested by each participating
Regulated Fund and each participating Affiliated Fund) to the Eligible
Directors of its participating Regulated Fund(s) for their
consideration. A Regulated Fund will enter into a Co-Investment
Transaction with one or more other Regulated Funds or Affiliated Funds
only if, prior to the Regulated Fund's participation in the Potential
Co-Investment Transaction, a Required Majority concludes that:
    (i) The terms of the transaction, including the consideration to be
paid, are reasonable and fair to the Regulated Fund and its equity
holders and do not involve overreaching in respect of the Regulated
Fund or its equity holders on the part of any person concerned;
    (ii) the transaction is consistent with:
    (A) The interests of the Regulated Fund's equity holders; and
    (B) the Regulated Fund's then-current Objectives and Strategies;
    (iii) the investment by any other Regulated Fund(s) or Affiliated
Fund(s) would not disadvantage the Regulated Fund, and participation by
the Regulated Fund would not be on a basis different from, or less
advantageous than, that of any other Regulated Fund(s) or Affiliated
Fund(s) participating in the transaction; provided that the Required
Majority shall not be prohibited from reaching the conclusions required
by this Condition 2(c)(iii) if:
    (A) The settlement date for another Regulated Fund or an Affiliated
Fund in a Co-Investment Transaction is later than the settlement date
for the Regulated Fund by no more than ten business days or earlier
than the settlement date for the Regulated Fund by no more than ten
business days, in either case, so long as: (x) The date on which the
commitment of the Affiliated Funds and Regulated Funds is made is the
same; and (y) the earliest settlement date and the latest settlement
date of any Affiliated Fund or Regulated Fund participating in the
transaction will occur within ten business days of each other; or

    (B) any other Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund, but not the
Regulated Fund itself, gains the right to nominate a director for
election to a portfolio company's board of directors, the right to have
a board observer or any similar right to participate in the governance
or management of the portfolio company so long as: (x) The Eligible
Directors will have the right to ratify the selection of such director
or board observer, if any; (y) the Adviser agrees to, and does, provide
periodic reports to the Regulated Fund's Board with respect to the
actions of such director or the information received by such board
observer or obtained through the exercise of any similar right to
participate in the governance or management of the portfolio company;
and (z) any fees or other compensation that any other Regulated Fund or
Affiliated Fund or any affiliated person of any other Regulated Fund or
Affiliated Fund receives in connection with the right of one or more
Regulated Funds or Affiliated Funds to nominate a director or appoint a
board observer or otherwise to participate in the governance or
management of the portfolio company will be shared proportionately
among any participating Affiliated Funds (who may, in turn, share their
portion with their affiliated persons) and any participating Regulated
Fund(s) in accordance with the amount of each such party's investment;
and
    (iv) the proposed investment by the Regulated Fund will not involve
compensation, remuneration or a direct or indirect \23\ financial
benefit to the Advisers, any other Regulated Fund, the Affiliated Funds
or any affiliated person of any of them (other than the parties to the
Co-Investment Transaction), except (A) to the extent permitted by
Condition 14, (B) to the extent permitted by Section 17(e) or 57(k), as
applicable, (C) indirectly, as a result of an interest in the
securities issued by one of the parties to the Co-Investment
Transaction, or (D) in the case of fees or other compensation described
in Condition 2(c)(iii)(B)(z).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ For example, procuring the Regulated Fund's investment in a
Potential Co-Investment Transaction to permit an affiliate to
complete or obtain better terms in a separate transaction would
constitute an indirect financial benefit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. Right to Decline. Each Regulated Fund has the right to decline
to participate in any Potential Co-Investment Transaction or to invest
less than the amount proposed.
    4. General Limitation. Except for Follow-On Investments made in
accordance with Conditions 8 and 9 below,\24\ a Regulated Fund will not
invest in reliance on the Order in any issuer in which a Related Party
has an investment.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ This exception applies only to Follow-On Investments by a
Regulated Fund in issuers in which that Regulated Fund already holds
investments.
    \25\ ``Related Party'' means (i) any Close Affiliate and (ii) in
respect of matters as to which any Adviser has knowledge, any Remote
Affiliate. ``Close Affiliate'' means the Advisers, the Regulated
Funds, the Affiliated Funds and any other person described in
Section 57(b) (after giving effect to Rule 57b-1) in respect of any
Regulated Fund (treating any registered investment company or series
thereof as a BDC for this purpose) except for limited partners
included solely by reason of the reference in Section 57(b) to
Section 2(a)(3)(D). ``Remote Affiliate'' means any person described
in Section 57(e) in respect of any Regulated Fund (treating any
registered investment company or series thereof as a BDC for this
purpose) and any limited partner holding 5% or more of the relevant
limited partner interests that would be a Close Affiliate but for
the exclusion in that definition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. Same Terms and Conditions. A Regulated Fund will not participate
in any Potential Co-Investment Transaction unless (i) the terms,
conditions, price, class of securities to be purchased, date on which
the commitment is entered into and registration rights (if any) will be
the same for each participating Regulated Fund and Affiliated Fund and
(ii) the earliest settlement date and the latest settlement date of any
participating Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund will occur as close in
time as practicable and in no event more than ten business days apart.
The grant to one or more Regulated Funds or Affiliated Funds, but not
the respective Regulated Fund, of the right to nominate a director for
election to a portfolio company's board of directors, the right to have
an observer on the board of directors or similar rights to participate
in the governance or management of the portfolio company will not be
interpreted so as to violate this Condition 5, if Condition
2(c)(iii)(B) is met.
    6. Standard Review Dispositions.
    (a) General. If any Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund elects to
sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of an interest in a security and
one or more Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds have previously
participated in a Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer,
then:
    (i) the Adviser to such Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund \26\ will
notify each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in the issuer of
the proposed Disposition at the earliest practical time; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ Any OFS Proprietary Account that is not advised by an
Adviser is itself deemed to be an Adviser for purposes of Conditions
6(a)(i), 7(a)(i), 8(a)(i) and 9(a)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (ii) the Adviser to each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in
the issuer will formulate a recommendation as to participation by such
Regulated Fund in the Disposition.
    (b) Same Terms and Conditions. Each Regulated Fund will have the
right to participate in such Disposition on a proportionate basis, at
the same price and on the same terms and conditions as those applicable
to the Affiliated Funds and any other Regulated Fund.
    (c) No Board Approval Required. A Regulated Fund may participate in
such a Disposition without obtaining prior approval of the Required
Majority if:
    (i) (A) The participation of each Regulated Fund and Affiliated
Fund in such Disposition is proportionate to its then-current holding
of the security (or securities) of the issuer that is (or are) the
subject of the Disposition \27\; (B) the Board of the Regulated Fund
has approved as being in the best interests of the Regulated Fund the
ability to participate in such Dispositions on a pro rata basis (as
described in greater detail in the application); and (C) the Board of
the Regulated Fund is provided on a quarterly basis with a list of all
Dispositions made in accordance with this Condition; or
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ In the case of any Disposition, proportionality will be
measured by each participating Regulated Fund's and Affiliated
Fund's outstanding investment in the security in question
immediately preceding the Disposition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (ii) each security is a Tradable Security and (A) the Disposition
is not to the issuer or any affiliated person of the issuer; and (B)
the security is sold for cash in a transaction in which the only term
negotiated by or on behalf of the participating Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds is price.
    (d) Standard Board Approval. In all other cases, the Adviser will
provide its written recommendation as to the Regulated Fund's
participation to the Eligible Directors and the Regulated Fund will
participate in such Disposition solely to the extent that a Required
Majority determines that it is in the Regulated Fund's best interests.
    7. Enhanced Review Dispositions.
    (a) General. If any Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund elects to
sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of a Pre-Boarding Investment in a
Potential Co-Investment Transaction and the Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds have not previously participated in a Co-Investment
Transaction with respect to the issuer:
    (i) The Adviser to such Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund will
notify each Regulated Fund that holds an

investment in the issuer of the proposed Disposition at the earliest
practical time;
    (ii) the Adviser to each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in
the issuer will formulate a recommendation as to participation by such
Regulated Fund in the Disposition; and
    (iii) the Advisers will provide to the Board of each Regulated Fund
that holds an investment in the issuer all information relating to the
existing investments in the issuer of the Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds, including the terms of such investments and how they
were made, that is necessary for the Required Majority to make the
findings required by this Condition.
    (b) Enhanced Board Approval. The Adviser will provide its written
recommendation as to the Regulated Fund's participation to the Eligible
Directors, and the Regulated Fund will participate in such Disposition
solely to the extent that a Required Majority determines that:
    (i) The Disposition complies with Condition 2(c)(i), (ii),
(iii)(A), and (iv); and
    (ii) the making and holding of the Pre-Boarding Investments were
not prohibited by Section 57 or Rule 17d-1, as applicable, and records
the basis for the finding in the Board minutes.
    (c) Additional Requirements. The Disposition may only be completed
in reliance on the Order if:
    (i) Same Terms and Conditions. Each Regulated Fund has the right to
participate in such Disposition on a proportionate basis, at the same
price and on the same terms and Conditions as those applicable to the
Affiliated Funds and any other Regulated Fund;
    (ii) Original Investments. All of the Affiliated Funds' and
Regulated Funds' investments in the issuer are Pre-Boarding
Investments;
    (iii) Advice of counsel. Independent counsel to the Board advises
that the making and holding of the investments in the Pre-Boarding
Investments were not prohibited by Section 57 (as modified by Rule 57b-
1) or Rule 17d-1, as applicable;
    (iv) Multiple Classes of Securities. All Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds that hold Pre-Boarding Investments in the issuer
immediately before the time of completion of the Co-Investment
Transaction hold the same security or securities of the issuer. For the
purpose of determining whether the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds
hold the same security or securities, they may disregard any security
held by some but not all of them if, prior to relying on the Order, the
Required Majority is presented with all information necessary to make a
finding, and finds, that: (x) Any Regulated Fund's or Affiliated Fund's
holding of a different class of securities (including for this purpose
a security with a different maturity date) is immaterial \28\ in
amount, including immaterial relative to the size of the issuer; and
(y) the Board records the basis for any such finding in its minutes. In
addition, securities that differ only in respect of issuance date,
currency, or denominations may be treated as the same security; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ In determining whether a holding is ``immaterial'' for
purposes of the Order, the Required Majority will consider whether
the nature and extent of the interest in the transaction or
arrangement is sufficiently small that a reasonable person would not
believe that the interest affected the determination of whether to
enter into the transaction or arrangement or the terms of the
transaction or arrangement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (v) No control. The Affiliated Funds, the other Regulated Funds and
their affiliated persons (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3)(C) of
the Act), individually or in the aggregate, do not control the issuer
of the securities (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(9) of the Act).
    8. Standard Review Follow-Ons.
    (a) General. If any Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund desires to
make a Follow-On Investment in an issuer and the Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds holding investments in the issuer previously
participated in a Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer:
    (i) The Adviser to each such Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund will
notify each Regulated Fund that holds securities of the portfolio
company of the proposed transaction at the earliest practical time; and
    (ii) the Adviser to each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in
the issuer will formulate a recommendation as to the proposed
participation, including the amount of the proposed investment, by such
Regulated Fund.
    (b) No Board Approval Required. A Regulated Fund may participate in
the Follow-On Investment without obtaining prior approval of the
Required Majority if:
    (i) (A) The proposed participation of each Regulated Fund and each
Affiliated Fund in such investment is proportionate to its outstanding
investments in the issuer or the security at issue, as appropriate,\29\
immediately preceding the Follow-On Investment; and (B) the Board of
the Regulated Fund has approved as being in the best interests of the
Regulated Fund the ability to participate in Follow-On Investments on a
pro rata basis (as described in greater detail in the application); or
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ To the extent that a Follow-On Investment opportunity is in
a security or arises in respect of a security held by the
participating Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds, proportionality
will be measured by each participating Regulated Fund's and
Affiliated Fund's outstanding investment in the security in question
immediately preceding the Follow-On Investment using the most recent
available valuation thereof. To the extent that a Follow-On
Investment opportunity relates to an opportunity to invest in a
security that is not in respect of any security held by any of the
participating Regulated Funds or Affiliated Funds, proportionality
will be measured by each participating Regulated Fund's and
Affiliated Fund's outstanding investment in the issuer immediately
preceding the Follow-On Investment using the most recent available
valuation thereof.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (ii) it is a Non-Negotiated Follow-On Investment.
    (c) Standard Board Approval. In all other cases, the Adviser will
provide its written recommendation as to the Regulated Fund's
participation to the Eligible Directors and the Regulated Fund will
participate in such Follow-On Investment solely to the extent that a
Required Majority makes the determinations set forth in Condition 2(c).
If the only previous Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the
issuer was an Enhanced Review Disposition the Eligible Directors must
complete this review of the proposed Follow-On Investment both on a
stand-alone basis and together with the Pre-Boarding Investments in
relation to the total economic exposure and other terms of the
investment.
    (d) Allocation. If, with respect to any such Follow-On Investment:
    (i) The amount of the opportunity proposed to be made available to
any Regulated Fund is not based on the Regulated Funds' and the
Affiliated Funds' outstanding investments in the issuer or the security
at issue, as appropriate, immediately preceding the Follow-On
Investment; and
    (ii) the aggregate amount recommended by the Advisers to be
invested in the Follow-On Investment by the participating Regulated
Funds and any participating Affiliated Funds, collectively, exceeds the
amount of the investment opportunity, then the Follow-On Investment
opportunity will be allocated among them pro rata based on the size of
the Internal Orders, as described in section III.A.1.b. of the
application.
    (e) Other Conditions. The acquisition of Follow-On Investments as
permitted by this Condition will be considered a Co-Investment
Transaction for all purposes and subject to the other Conditions set
forth in the application.
    9. Enhanced Review Follow-Ons.
    (a) General. If any Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund desires to
make a

Follow-On Investment in an issuer that is a Potential Co-Investment
Transaction and the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds holding
investments in the issuer have not previously participated in a Co-
Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer:
    (i) The Adviser to each such Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund will
notify each Regulated Fund that holds securities of the portfolio
company of the proposed transaction at the earliest practical time;
    (ii) the Adviser to each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in
the issuer will formulate a recommendation as to the proposed
participation, including the amount of the proposed investment, by such
Regulated Fund; and
    (iii) the Advisers will provide to the Board of each Regulated Fund
that holds an investment in the issuer all information relating to the
existing investments in the issuer of the Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds, including the terms of such investments and how they
were made, that is necessary for the Required Majority to make the
findings required by this Condition.
    (b) Enhanced Board Approval. The Adviser will provide its written
recommendation as to the Regulated Fund's participation to the Eligible
Directors, and the Regulated Fund will participate in such Follow-On
Investment solely to the extent that a Required Majority reviews the
proposed Follow-On Investment both on a stand-alone basis and together
with the Pre-Boarding Investments in relation to the total economic
exposure and other terms and makes the determinations set forth in
Condition 2(c). In addition, the Follow-On Investment may only be
completed in reliance on the Order if the Required Majority of each
participating Regulated Fund determines that the making and holding of
the Pre-Boarding Investments were not prohibited by Section 57 (as
modified by Rule 57b-1) or Rule 17d-1, as applicable. The basis for the
Board's findings will be recorded in its minutes.
    (c) Additional Requirements. The Follow-On Investment may only be
completed in reliance on the Order if:
    (i) Original Investments. All of the Affiliated Funds' and
Regulated Funds' investments in the issuer are Pre-Boarding
Investments;
    (ii) Advice of counsel. Independent counsel to the Board advises
that the making and holding of the investments in the Pre-Boarding
Investments were not prohibited by Section 57 (as modified by Rule 57b-
1) or Rule 17d-1, as applicable;
    (iii) Multiple Classes of Securities. All Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds that hold Pre-Boarding Investments in the issuer
immediately before the time of completion of the Co-Investment
Transaction hold the same security or securities of the issuer. For the
purpose of determining whether the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds
hold the same security or securities, they may disregard any security
held by some but not all of them if, prior to relying on the Order, the
Required Majority is presented with all information necessary to make a
finding, and finds, that: (x) Any Regulated Fund's or Affiliated Fund's
holding of a different class of securities (including for this purpose
a security with a different maturity date) is immaterial in amount,
including immaterial relative to the size of the issuer; and (y) the
Board records the basis for any such finding in its minutes. In
addition, securities that differ only in respect of issuance date,
currency, or denominations may be treated as the same security; and
    (iv) No control. The Affiliated Funds, the other Regulated Funds
and their affiliated persons (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3)(C)
of the Act), individually or in the aggregate, do not control the
issuer of the securities (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(9) of the
Act).
    (d) Allocation. If, with respect to any such Follow-On Investment:
    (i) The amount of the opportunity proposed to be made available to
any Regulated Fund is not based on the Regulated Funds' and the
Affiliated Funds' outstanding investments in the issuer or the security
at issue, as appropriate, immediately preceding the Follow-On
Investment; and
    (ii) the aggregate amount recommended by the Advisers to be
invested in the Follow-On Investment by the participating Regulated
Funds and any participating Affiliated Funds, collectively, exceeds the
amount of the investment opportunity, then the Follow-On Investment
opportunity will be allocated among them pro rata based on the size of
the Internal Orders, as described in Section III.A.1.(b) of the
application.
    (e) Other Conditions. The acquisition of Follow-On Investments as
permitted by this Condition will be considered a Co-Investment
Transaction for all purposes and subject to the other Conditions set
forth in the application. 10. Board Reporting, Compliance and Annual
Re-Approval. (a) Each Adviser to a Regulated Fund will present to the
Board of each Regulated Fund, on a quarterly basis, and at such other
times as the Board may request, (i) a record of all investments in
Potential Co-Investment Transactions made by any of the other Regulated
Funds or any of the Affiliated Funds during the preceding quarter that
fell within the Regulated Fund's then-current Objectives and Strategies
and Board-Established Criteria that were not made available to the
Regulated Fund, and an explanation of why such investment opportunities
were not made available to the Regulated Fund; (ii) a record of all
Follow-On Investments in and Dispositions of investments in any issuer
in which the Regulated Fund holds any investments by any Affiliated
Fund or other Regulated Fund during the prior quarter; and (iii) all
information concerning Potential Co-Investment Transactions and Co-
Investment Transactions, including investments made by other Regulated
Funds or Affiliated Funds that the Regulated Fund considered but
declined to participate in, so that the Independent Directors, may
determine whether all Potential Co-Investment Transactions and Co-
Investment Transactions during the preceding quarter, including those
investments that the Regulated Fund considered but declined to
participate in, comply with the Conditions.
    (b) All information presented to the Regulated Fund's Board
pursuant to this Condition will be kept for the life of the Regulated
Fund and at least two years thereafter, and will be subject to
examination by the Commission and its staff.
    (c) Each Regulated Fund's chief compliance officer, as defined in
rule 38a-1(a)(4), will prepare an annual report for its Board each year
that evaluates (and documents the basis of that evaluation) the
Regulated Fund's compliance with the terms and Conditions of the
application and the procedures established to achieve such compliance.
    (d) The Independent Directors will consider at least annually
whether continued participation in new and existing Co-Investment
Transactions is in the Regulated Fund's best interests.
    11. Record Keeping. Each Regulated Fund will maintain the records
required by Section 57(f)(3) of the Act as if each of the Regulated
Funds were a BDC and each of the investments permitted under these
Conditions were approved by the Required Majority under Section 57(f).
    12. Director Independence. No Independent Director of a Regulated
Fund will also be a director, general partner, managing member or
principal, or otherwise be an ``affiliated person''

(as defined in the Act) of any Affiliated Fund.
    13. Expenses. The expenses, if any, associated with acquiring,
holding or disposing of any securities acquired in a Co-Investment
Transaction (including, without limitation, the expenses of the
distribution of any such securities registered for sale under the
Securities Act) will, to the extent not payable by the Advisers under
their respective advisory agreements with the Regulated Funds and the
Affiliated Funds, be shared by the Regulated Funds and the
participating Affiliated Funds in proportion to the relative amounts of
the securities held or being acquired or disposed of, as the case may
be.
    14. Transaction Fees.\30\ Any transaction fee (including break-up,
structuring, monitoring or commitment fees but excluding brokerage or
underwriting compensation permitted by Section 17(e) or 57(k)) received
in connection with any Co-Investment Transaction will be distributed to
the participants on a pro rata basis based on the amounts they invested
or committed, as the case may be, in such Co-Investment Transaction. If
any transaction fee is to be held by an Adviser pending consummation of
the transaction, the fee will be deposited into an account maintained
by the Adviser at a bank or banks having the qualifications prescribed
in Section 26(a)(1), and the account will earn a competitive rate of
interest that will also be divided pro rata among the participants.
None of the Advisers, the Affiliated Funds, the other Regulated Funds
or any affiliated person of the Affiliated Funds or the Regulated Funds
will receive any additional compensation or remuneration of any kind as
a result of or in connection with a Co-Investment Transaction other
than (i) in the case of the Regulated Funds and the Affiliated Funds,
the pro rata transaction fees described above and fees or other
compensation described in Condition 2(c)(iii)(B)(z), (ii) brokerage or
underwriting compensation permitted by Section 17(e) or 57(k) or (iii)
in the case of the Advisers, investment advisory compensation paid in
accordance with investment advisory agreements between the applicable
Regulated Fund(s) or Affiliated Fund(s) and its Adviser.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ Applicants are not requesting and the Commission is not
providing any relief for transaction fees received in connection
with any Co-Investment Transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    15. Independence. If the Holders own in the aggregate more than 25
percent of the Shares of a Regulated Fund, then the Holders will vote
such Shares as directed by an independent third party when voting on
(1) the election of directors; (2) the removal of one or more
directors; or (3) any other matter under either the Act or applicable
State law affecting the Board's composition, size or manner of
election.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-15104 Filed 7-13-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63534-63536]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25383]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2014-0922]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone: Semisubmersible Loading Operation Safety Zone, South
San Francisco Bay, San Francisco, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
navigable waters of South San Francisco Bay in support of the
Semisubmersible Loading Operation taking place between October 14 and
23, 2014 for a 24-hour period. This safety zone is established to
ensure the safety of workers, mariners, and other vessels transiting
the area from the dangers associated with the loading operations.
Unauthorized persons or vessels are prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or remaining in the safety zone without permission
of the Captain of the Port or their designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from 12:01 a.m. to
11:59 p.m. on October 24, 2014. For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from October 14, 2014, until October 24, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2014-0922. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade Joshua V. Dykman, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Francisco; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call the Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
PATCOM U.S. Coast Guard Patrol Commander
ULCV Ultra Large Container Vessel

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Notice and comment procedures would be impracticable as the
Coast Guard received the final information about the date and time of
the Semisubmersible Loading Operation on October 1, 2014, and the
operation would occur before the rulemaking process would be completed.
Because of the dangers posed by this operation, the safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the workers, mariners, and other
vessels transiting the area.
    For similar reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal Register. For the safety
concerns noted, it is in the public interest to have these regulations
in effect during the event.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for the rule is 33 U.S.C 1231; 46 U.S.C Chapter
701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6,
160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast
Guard to establish safety zones.
    The Port of San Francisco will sponsor the Semisubmersible Loading
Operation Safety Zone taking place between October 14 and 23, 2014, for
a 24-hour period, in South San Francisco Bay, CA as depicted in
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Charts 18649 and
18651. This safety zone establishes a temporary restricted area on the
waters within 500 feet of the anchored semisubmersible and all support
vessels engaged in the loading operation at Anchorage 9 in approximate
position 37[deg]46'09'' N, 122[deg]21'31'' W (NAD83). This restricted
area around the vessels engaged in the loading operation is necessary
to provide for the safety of workers, mariners, and other vessels
transiting the area from the hazards associated with the loading
operation.

C. Discussion of the Final Rule

    The Coast Guard will enforce a safety zone in navigable waters
around and under the semisubmersible and all support vessels within 500
feet in South San Francisco Bay during the loading operation taking
place between October 14 and 23, 2014 for a 24-hour period. Upon the
conclusion of the loading operation the safety zone shall terminate.
    The effect of the temporary safety zone will be to restrict
navigation in the vicinity of the loading operation until the
conclusion of the operation. Except

for persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain in the restricted area. These
regulations are needed to keep vessels away from the vessels engaged in
the loading operation to ensure the freedom of movement of workers and
ensure the safety of mariners transiting the area.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    We expect the economic impact of this rule will not rise to the
level of necessitating a full Regulatory Evaluation. The safety zone is
limited in duration, and is limited to a narrowly tailored geographic
area. In addition, although this rule restricts access to the waters
encompassed by the safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be
significant because the local waterway users will be notified via
public Broadcast Notice to Mariners to ensure the safety zone will
result in minimum impact. The entities most likely to be affected are
waterfront facilities, commercial vessels, and pleasure craft engaged
in recreational activities.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
    This rule may affect owners and operators of waterfront facilities,
commercial vessels, and pleasure craft engaged in recreational
activities and sightseeing. This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This safety zone would be activated, and
thus subject to enforcement, for a limited duration. When the safety
zone is activated, vessel traffic may coordinate movements around the
safety zone by contacting PATCOM on VHF channel 16. The maritime public
will be advised in advance of this safety zone via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety zone of limited size and
duration. This rule is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR Part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3707; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T11-670 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T11-670  Safety zone; Semisubmersible Loading Operation
Safety Zone, South San Francisco Bay, San Francisco, CA.

    (a) Location. This temporary safety zone is established in the
navigable waters of South San Francisco Bay within 500 feet of the
anchored semisubmersible and all support vessels engaged in the loading
operation at Anchorage 9 in approximate position 37[deg]46'09'' N,
122[deg]21'31'' W (NAD83).
    (b) Enforcement Period. The zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section will be enforced for a 24-hour period between October 14 and
23, 2014. The Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP) will notify the
maritime community of periods during which this zone will be enforced
via Broadcast Notice to Mariners in accordance with 33 CFR 165.7.
    (c) Definitions. As used in this section, ``designated
representative'' means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer on a Coast Guard
vessel or a Federal, State, or local officer designated by or assisting
the COTP pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding with that agency, to
assist in the enforcement of the safety zone.
    (d) Regulations. (1) Under the general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165, Subpart C, entry into, transiting or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated
representative.
    (2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or a designated representative.
    (3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or a designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or a designated representative. Persons and vessels
may request permission to enter the safety zone by contacting the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander on VHF channel 23A.

    Dated: October 9, 2014.
Gregory G. Stump,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2014-25383 Filed 10-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 111 (Thursday, June 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 35272]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12399]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-95034; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2021-078]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proceedings To
Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change, as
Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Introduce a New Data Product To Be
Known as the Short Volume Report

June 3, 2022.
    On November 17, 2021, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend Exchange Rule 11.22(f) to introduce a new
data product to be known as the Short Volume Report. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on December 7,
2021.\3\ On January 20, 2022, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\4\ the Commission designated a longer period within which to
approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change,
or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the
proposed rule change.\5\ On March 7, 2022, the Commission instituted
proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\ On March
30, 2022, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change, which superseded the proposed rule change as originally filed.
The proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, was published
for comment in the Federal Register on April 28, 2022.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93688 (December 1,
2021), 86 FR 69319 (``Notice''). The comment letters received on the
proposed rule change are available on the Commission's website at:
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboebzx-2021-078/srcboebzx2021078.htm.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94010, 87 FR 4075
(January 26, 2022). The Commission designated March 7, 2022 as the
date by which the Commission shall approve or disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the
proposed rule change.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94372, 87 FR 14053
(March 11, 2022).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94788 (April 22,
2022), 87 FR 25328.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \9\ provides that, after initiating
proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180 days after the
date of publication of notice of the filing of the proposed rule
change. The Commission may extend the period for issuing an order
approving or disapproving the proposed rule change, however, by not
more than 60 days if the Commission determines that a longer period is
appropriate and publishes the reasons for such determination. The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on December 7, 2021.\10\ The 180th day after publication of the
proposed rule change is June 5, 2022. The Commission is extending the
time period for approving or disapproving the proposal for an
additional 60 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \10\ See Notice, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the
proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, and the comments
that have been submitted in connection therewith. Accordingly, the
Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\11\ designates
August 4, 2022, as the date by which the Commission should either
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change (File No. SR-CboeBZX-
2021-078), as modified by Amendment No. 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-12399 Filed 6-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 199 (Monday, October 15, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51910-51911]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22399]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 9 and 721

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2017-0366; FRL-9984-72]
RIN 2070-AB27

Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Substances;
Reopening of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; reopening of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a proposed rule in the Federal Register of August
1, 2018 (FRL-9981-16) for significant new use rules (SNURs) for 145
chemical substances. This document reopens the comment period for the
proposed rule until November 14, 2018. EPA is reopening the comment
period because it received a request to extend the comment period but
the request was received too late to publish an extension of the
comment period before the comment period expired.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPPT-2017-0366 must be received on or before November 14, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in
the Federal Register document of August 1, 2018 (83 FR 37455) (FRL-
9981-16).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For technical information contact: Kenneth Moss, Chemical Control
Division (7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
[email protected].
    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document reopens the public comment
period established in the Federal Register document of August 1, 2018.
In that document, EPA proposed SNURs for 145 chemical substances. EPA
received a request to extend the comment period for 30 days but the
request was received too late to publish an extension of the comment
period before the comment period expired. EPA is hereby reopening the
comment period for 30 days.
    Note that in the August 1, 2018 issue of the Federal Register
including the

proposed SNURs for 145 chemical substances, the Agency also issued
direct final SNURs for these chemical substances (83 FR 37702) (FRL-
9970-23); that action was withdrawn on September 26, 2018 (83 FR 48546)
(FRL-9983-72) before it became effective because of the receipt of
negative comments. EPA will address all adverse public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule.
    To submit comments, or access the docket, please follow the
detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in the Federal Register
document of August 1, 2018. If you have questions, consult the
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 9

    Environmental protection, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

40 CFR Part 721

    Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: October 5, 2018.
Tala R. Henry,
Acting Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2018-22399 Filed 10-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P