[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38670-38672]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16834]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0608]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation; Battle of the Bridges, Intracoastal
Waterway, Venice, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary special
local regulation for certain waters of the Intracoastal Waterway. This
action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these
navigable waters in Venice, FL, during the Battle of the Bridges on
September 15, 2018. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and
vessels from being in the race area unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port St. Petersburg (COTP) or a designated representative. We
invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 22, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0608 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Marine Science Technician First
Class Michael Shackleford, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On November 7, 2017, the Sarasota Scullers Youth Rowing Program
notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting the Battle of the
Bridges sculler race from 7 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. on September 15, 2018.
The race will take place in portions of the Intracoastal Waterway in
Venice, FL. The Captain of the Port St. Petersburg (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards associated with the race to be a
safety concern for anyone within area where the race is taking place.
    The Coast Guard is requesting that interested parties provide
comments within a shortened comment period of 15 days instead of a
standard 30 days for this notice of proposed rulemaking. The Coast
Guard believes a shortened comment period is necessary and reasonable
because the special local regulation is necessary to ensure the safety
of vessels and the navigable waters within, or near the race area
during the scheduled event. Any delay in making this final rule
effective by allowing comments for more than 15 days would not be in
the best interest of public safety.
    The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33
U.S.C. 1233.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP proposes to establish a temporary special local regulation
from 7 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. on September 15, 2018. The regulation would
cover a race which would take place on approximately 3.5 miles of the
Intracoastal Waterway starting near the Shamrock Park & Nature Center
and ending near the Tamiami Trail Bridge in Venice, FL. The duration of
the regulation is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these
navigable waters during the scheduled 7 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. race. No
vessel or person would be permitted to enter the regulated area without
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative.
Persons or vessels receiving permission to enter the regulated area
must comply with the instructions of the COTP or a designated
representative. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end
of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory

approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs
agencies to control regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This
NPRM has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance
it is exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the special local regulation.
This regulation would impact approximately 3.5 miles of the
Intracoastal Waterway in Venice, FL for twelve and half hours on one
day. The Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the regulation, and the rule would allow
vessels to seek permission to enter the race area in emergency
situations. Advance notice of the regulation will provide the local
community with ample time to plan around the race event accordingly.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
regulation area may be small entities, for the reasons stated in
section IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary
determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule involves special local regulation which
temporarily limits access to the portions of the Intracoastal Waterway
in Venice, FL to race participants only, except in emergency
situations. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L[61] of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.

    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1233; 33 CFR 1.05-1.

0
2. Add Sec.  100.35T07-0195 to read as follows:

Sec.  100.35T07-0195   Special Local Regulation; Battle of the Bridges,
Intracoastal Waterway; Venice, FL.

    (a) Regulated Area. A regulated area is established to include a
race area located on all waters of the Intracoastal Waterway south of a
line made connecting the following points: 27[deg]06'15'' N,
082[deg]26'43'' W, to position 27[deg]06'12'' N, 082[deg]26'43'' W, and
all waters of the Intracoastal Waterway north of a line made connecting
the following points: 27[deg]03'21'' N, 082[deg]26'17'' W, to position
27[deg]03'19'' N, 082[deg]26'15'' W. All coordinates are North American
Datum 1983.
    (b) Definitions. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the COTP
St. Petersburg in the enforcement of the regulated areas.
    (c) Regulations.(1) All non-participant persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the race area unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port (COTP) St. Petersburg or a designated representative.
    (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the race area may contact the COTP St. Petersburg
by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via VHF-FM radio Channel 16 to
request authorization.
    (3) If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the race area is granted, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization shall comply with the instructions of the
COTP or a designated representative.
    (4) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated areas by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, or by on-scene
designated representatives.
    (d) Enforcement Period. This rule will be enforced from 7 a.m.
until 7:30 p.m. on September 15, 2018.

Holly L. Najarian,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Saint Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2018-16834 Filed 8-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: June 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 109)]
[Notices]
[Page 32531-32532]
[DOCID:fr08jn10-161]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62195; File No. SR-ISE-2010-46]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to Fee Changes

May 28, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on May 18, 2010, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the
``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to amend its Schedule of Fees. The text
of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at
http://www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and at the Commission's
Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    (a) Purpose--The Exchange currently identifies on its Schedule of
Fees certain ETF products whose options are listed only on ISE and for
which the Exchange charges a fee of $0.18 per contract for customer
transactions. Currently, the First Trust ISE Water ETF (``FIW''), the
Claymore China Technology ETF (``CQQQ''), the ProShares UltraPro Short
Dow30 (``SDOW''), the ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (``UDOW''), the
ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 (``SMDD''), the ProShares UltraPro
MidCap400 (``UMDD''), the ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000
(``SRTY''), the ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (``URTY''), the First
Trust ISE Global Copper Index Fund (``CU'') and the First Trust ISE
Global Platinum Index Fund (``PLTM'') are the only such ETFs listed on
the Exchange's fee schedule. On May 18, 2010, ISE began listing options
on the First Trust Amex Biotechnology Index Fund (``FBT''), the First
Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund (``FXO'') and the First Trust NASDAQ 100
Weighted Index Fund (``QQEW''). As of the date of this filing, FBT, FXO
and QQEW are singly listed on ISE. The Exchange therefore proposes to
charge a fee of $0.18 per contract for customer transactions in options
on FBT, FXO and QQEW. The Exchange also proposes to charge a Payment
for Order Flow fee for transactions in options on these products.
    (b) Basis--The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\3\ in general,
and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\4\ in particular, in
that it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its members and other
persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3) of

the Act \5\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \6\ thereunder. At any time within 60
days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission may
summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \6\ 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2010-46 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2010-46. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100
F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090 on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing will also
be available for inspection and copying at ISE's principal office and
on its Internet Web site at http://www.ise.com. All comments received
will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2010-46 and should be submitted on
or before June 29, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-13664 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10938-10940]
[FR Doc No: 2023-03638]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2023-0001]

PSM On-Site Consultation Agreements; in Use Without an OMB Number
and Seeks Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of
Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comments concerning the proposal of a new
collection subject to Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) approval
for the information collection requirements specified in the PSM On-
Site Consultation Agreements.

DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by
April 24, 2023.

ADDRESSES:
    Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting
comments.
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to https://

www.regulations.gov. Documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index; however, some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to read or download through the
website. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available
for inspection through the OSHA Docket Office. Contact the OSHA Docket
Office at<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>) for assistance in
locating docket submissions.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and OSHA
docket number OSHA-2023-0001 for the Information Collection Request
(ICR). OSHA will place all comments, including any personal
information, in the public docket, which may be made available online.
Therefore, OSHA cautions interested parties about submitting personal
information such as social security numbers and birthdates.
    For further information on submitting comments, see the ``Public
Participation'' heading in the section of this notice titled
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seleda Perryman or Theda Kenney,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Department of Labor, as part of the continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information
collection requirements in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that
information is in the desired format, reporting burden (time and costs)
is minimal, the collection instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA's estimate of the information collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the OSH Act or for developing
information regarding the causes and prevention of occupational
injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also
requires that OSHA obtain such information with minimum burden upon
employers, especially those operating small businesses, and to reduce
to the maximum extent feasible unnecessary duplication of effort in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
    Section 7(c)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (i.e.,
``the OSH Act'' or ``the Act'') authorizes the Secretary of Labor to,
``with the consent of any State or political subdivision thereof,
accept and use the services, facilities, and personnel of any agency of
such State or subdivision with reimbursement.'' Section 21(c) of the
Act authorizes the Secretary of Labor to ``consult with and advise
employers and workers . . . as to effective means of preventing
occupational illnesses and injuries.'' To satisfy the intent of these
and other sections of the Act, the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) codified the terms that govern cooperative
agreements between OSHA and State governments or U.S. Territories
whereby State agencies and U.S. Territories provide On-Site
Consultation services to private sector, small business employers to
assist them in complying with the requirements of the Act. The terms
were codified as the On-Site Consultation Program regulations (29 CFR
part 1908).
    OSHA's Compliance Assistance Authorization Act of 1998 (CAAA)
amended Section 21 of the OSH Act by adding paragraph (d), authorizing
the Secretary of Labor to enter into agreements with the States and
U.S. Territories to provide On-Site Consultation services, and
established rules under which employers may qualify for an inspection
exemption. To achieve the intent of the CAAA, OSHA published a final
rule to amend 29 CFR part 1908. The rule became effective on December
26, 2000. The On-Site Consultation Program regulations specify services
to be provided, as well as practices and procedures to be followed by
the State On-Site Consultation programs. The Federal government
provides 90 percent of funds for On-Site Consultation services.

II. Special Issues for Comment

    OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
     Whether the proposed information collection requirements
are necessary for the proper performance of the agency's functions to
protect workers, including whether the information is useful;
     The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
     Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply;
for example, by using automated or other technological information
collection, and transmission techniques.

III. Proposed Actions

    OSHA is requesting that OMB approves the new information collection
requirements contained in the PSM On-Site Consultation Agreements. The
agency is requesting that OMB approves 26,766 burden hours for this
collection.
    OSHA will summarize the comments submitted in response to this
notice and will include this summary in the request to OMB to extend
the approval of the information collection requirements.
    Type of Review: In Use Without an OMB Number.
    Title: PSM On-Site Consultation Agreements.
    OMB Control Number: 1218-0NEW.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profits.
    Number of Respondents: 34.
    Number of Responses: 6,841.
    Frequency of Responses: On occasion.
    Average Time per Response: Varies.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 26,766.
    Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $0.

IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on This Notice and
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions

    You may submit comments in response to this document as follows:
(1) electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile (fax); if your comments, including
attachments, are not longer than 10 pages you may fax them to the OSHA
Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>; or (3) by hard copy. Please note: While
OSHA's Docket Office is continuing to accept and process submissions by
regular mail due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Docket Office is closed
to the public and not able to receive submissions to the docket by
hand, express mail, messenger, and courier service. All comments,
attachments, and other material must identify the agency name and the
OSHA docket number for the ICR (OSHA-2023-0001). You may supplement
electronic submissions by uploading document files electronically. If
you wish to mail additional materials in reference to an electronic or
a facsimile submission, you must submit them to the OSHA Docket Office
(see the section of this notice titled ADDRESSES). The additional
materials must clearly identify your electronic comments by your name,
date, and the docket number so that the agency can attach them to your
comments.

    Due to security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of comments.
    Comments and submissions are posted without change at http://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about
submitting personal information such as social security numbers and
dates of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index, some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to read or download from this
website. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available
for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. Information on
using the https://www.regulations.gov website to submit comments and
access the docket is available at the website's ``User Tips'' link.
Contact the OSHA Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>, (TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>)
for information about materials not available from the website, and for
assistance in using the internet to locate docket submissions.

V. Authority and Signature

    James S. Frederick, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this
notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 8-2020
(85 FR 58393).

    Signed at Washington, DC.
James S. Frederick,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2023-03638 Filed 2-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P