[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 164 (Thursday, August 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42737-42739]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18166]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83881; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2018-034]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the Options Regulatory Fee

August 17, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on August 9, 2018, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one establishing or
changing a member due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange
under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposed rule change effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend its fee schedule related to
the Options Regulatory Fee.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
website at www.markets.cboe.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to modify the fee schedule applicable to the
Exchange's options platform (``EDGX Options'') to amend the rate of its
Options Regulatory Fee (``ORF'').\5\ Currently, the Exchange charges an
ORF in the amount of $0.0004 per contract side. The Exchange proposes
to decrease the amount of ORF from $0.0004 per contract side to $0.0001
per contract side. The proposed change to ORF should continue to
balance the Exchange's regulatory expenses against the anticipated
revenue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee change on
August 1, 2018 (SR-CboeEDGX-2018-028) for August 1, 2018
effectiveness. On business date August 9, 2018, the Exchange
withdrew that filing and submitted this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The ORF is assessed by the Exchange on each Member for options
transactions cleared by the Member that are cleared by the Options
Clearing Corporation (OCC) in the customer range, regardless of the
exchange on which the transaction occurs. In other words, the Exchange
imposes the ORF on all customer-range transactions cleared by a Member,
even if the transactions do not take place on the Exchange. The ORF is
collected by OCC on behalf of the Exchange from the Clearing Member or
non-Clearing Member that ultimately clears the transaction. With
respect to linkage transactions, the Exchange reimburses its routing
broker providing Routing Services for options regulatory fees it incurs
in connection with the Routing Services it provides.
    Revenue generated from ORF, when combined with all of the
Exchange's other regulatory fees and fines, is designed to recover a
material portion of the regulatory costs to the Exchange of the
supervision and regulation of Member customer options business.
Regulatory costs include direct regulatory expenses and certain
indirect expenses for work allocated in support of the regulatory
function. The direct expenses include in-house and third party service
provider costs to support

the day to day regulatory work such as surveillances, investigations
and examinations. The indirect expenses include support from such areas
as human resources, legal, information technology and accounting. These
indirect expenses are estimated to be approximately 12% of EDGX
Options' total regulatory costs for 2018. Thus, direct expenses are
estimated to be approximately 88% of total regulatory costs for 2018.
In addition, it is EDGX Options' practice that revenue generated from
ORF not exceed more than 75% of total annual regulatory costs. These
expectations are estimated, preliminary and may change. There can be no
assurance that our final costs for 2018 will not differ materially from
these expectations and prior practice; however, the Exchange believes
that revenue generated from the ORF, when combined with all of the
Exchange's other regulatory fees and fines, will cover a material
portion, but not all, of the Exchange's regulatory costs.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Exchange notes that its regulatory responsibilities with
respect to compliance with options sales practice rules has been
allocated to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') under a 17d-2 Agreement. The ORF is not designed to
cover the cost of options sales practice regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange will continue to monitor the amount of revenue
collected from the ORF to ensure that it, in combination with its other
regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed the Exchange's total
regulatory costs. The Exchange monitors its regulatory costs and
revenues at a minimum on a semi-annual basis. If the Exchange
determines regulatory revenues exceed or are insufficient to cover a
material portion of its regulatory costs, the Exchange will adjust the
ORF by submitting a fee change filing to the Commission. The Exchange
notifies Members of adjustments to the ORF via regulatory circular. The
Exchange provides Members with such notice at least 30 calendar days
prior to the effective date of the change.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and,
in particular, with the requirements of Section 6 of the Act.\7\
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\8\ in that it provides for
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and other persons using its facilities. The Exchange
notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market
participants can readily direct order flow to competing venues or
providers of routing services if they deem fee levels to be excessive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the decreased ORF is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because it would be objectively allocated to
Members in that it would be charged to all Members on all their
transactions that clear as customer transactions at the OCC. The
Exchange believes that decreasing the ORF is reasonable because the
Exchange's collection of ORF needs to be balanced against the amount of
regulatory revenue collected by the Exchange. The Exchange believes
that the proposed adjustment noted herein will serve to continue to
balance the Exchange's regulatory revenue against its anticipated
regulatory costs.
    The Exchange has designed the ORF to generate revenues that, when
combined with all of the Exchange's other regulatory fees, will be less
than or equal to the Exchange's regulatory costs, which is consistent
with the Commission's view that regulatory fees be used for regulatory
purposes and not to support the Exchange's business side. In this
regard, the Exchange believes that the decreased level of the fee is
reasonable and appropriate.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. This proposal does not create
an unnecessary or inappropriate intra-market burden on competition
because the ORF applies to all customer activity, thereby raising
regulatory revenue to offset regulatory expenses. It also supplements
the regulatory revenue derived from non-customer activity. This
proposal does not create an unnecessary or inappropriate inter-market
burden on competition because it is a regulatory fee that supports
regulation in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange is
obligated to ensure that the amount of regulatory revenue collected
from the ORF, in combination with its other regulatory fees and fines,
does not exceed regulatory costs.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any written comments from members or other interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\10\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2018-034 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2018-034. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the

proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2018-034, and should
be submitted on or before September 13, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-18166 Filed 8-22-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13342-13343]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06201]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Bureau of Transportation Statistics

[Docket ID Number DOT-OST-2014-0031 BTS Paperwork Reduction Notice]

Agency Information Collection; Activity Under OMB Review;
Submission of Audit Reports--Part 248

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology
(OST-R), Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), Department of
Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public
Law 104-13, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics invites the general
public, industry and other governmental parties to comment on the
continuing need for and usefulness of BTS requiring U.S. large
certificated air carriers to submit two true and complete copies of its
annual audit that is made by an independent public accountant. If a
carrier does not have an annual audit, the carrier must file a
statement that no audit has been performed. Comments are requested
concerning whether (1) the audit reports are needed by BTS and DOT; (2)
BTS accurately estimated the reporting burden; (3) there are other ways
to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information
collected; and (4) there are ways to minimize reporting burden,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by May 29, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket ID Number
DOT-OST-2014-0031 by any of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
    Mail: Docket Services: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington,
DC 20590-0001.
    Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Identify docket number, DOT-OST-2014-0031, at the
beginning of your comments, and send two copies. To receive
confirmation that DOT received your comments, include a self-addressed
stamped postcard. Internet users may access all comments received by
DOT at http://www.regulations.gov. All comments are posted
electronically without charge or edits, including any personal
information provided.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit http://DocketInfo.dot.gov.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov. or the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets.

Electronic Access

    You may access comments received for this notice at http://www.regulations.gov, by searching docket DOT-OST-2014-0031.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: [email protected], Office of Airline
Information, RTS-42, Room E34, Bureau of Transportation Statistics,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: OMB Approval No.: 2138-0004.
    Title: Submission of Audit Reports--Part 248.
    Form No.: None.
    Type Of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Respondents: Large certificated air carriers.
    Number of Respondents: 60.
    Number of Responses: 60.
    Total Annual Burden: 20 hours.
    Needs and Uses: BTS collects independent audited financial reports
from U.S. certificated air carriers. Carriers not having an annual
audit must file a statement that no such audit has been performed. In
lieu of the audit report, BTS will accept the annual report submitted
to the stockholders. The audited reports are needed by the Department
of Transportation as (1) a means to monitor an air carrier's continuing
fitness to operate, (2) reference material used by analysts in
examining foreign route cases (3) reference material used by analyst in
examining proposed mergers, acquisitions and consolidations, (4) a
means whereby BTS sends a copy of the report to the International Civil
Aviation Organization (ICAO) in fulfillment of a United States treaty
obligation, and (5) corroboration of a carrier's Form 41 filings.

    The Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency
Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note), requires a statistical agency to
clearly identify information it collects for non-statistical purposes.
BTS hereby notifies the respondents and the public that BTS uses the
information it collects under this OMB approval for non-statistical
purposes including, but not limited to, publication of both
Respondent's identity and its data, submission of the information to
agencies outside BTS for review, analysis and possible use in
regulatory and other administrative matters.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 20, 2018.
William Chadwick, Jr.,
Director, Office of Airline Information, Bureau of Transportation
Statistics.
[FR Doc. 2018-06201 Filed 3-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 223 (Monday, November 19, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58194-58196]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24965]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0920; Product Identifier 2016-NE-09-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney Division Turbofan
Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2016-22-
05, which applies to certain Pratt & Whitney Division (PW) PW4164,
PW4164-1D, PW4168, PW4168-1D, PW4168A, PW4168A-1D, and PW4170 turbofan
engines. AD 2016-22-05 requires initial and repetitive inspections of
the affected fuel nozzles and their replacement with parts eligible for
installation. Since we issued AD 2016-22-05, PW introduced newly forged
fuel nozzles, fuel manifold brackets, and clamps. This proposed AD
would require initial and repetitive inspections of the affected fuel
nozzles and fuel nozzle supply manifold assemblies, replacement of the
affected fuel nozzles with parts eligible for installation, and the
installation of new brackets and clamps on the fuel supply manifold
assemblies with parts eligible for installation. We are proposing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 3, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Pratt &
Whitney Division, 400 Main St., East Hartford, CT 06108; phone: 860-
565-8770; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. You may view this service information at
the FAA, Engine & Propeller Standards Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0920; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is listed above. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Hopper, Aerospace Engineer, ECO
Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-
238-7154; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2018-0920;
Product Identifier 2016-NE-09-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM because
of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We issued AD 2016-22-05, Amendment 39-18694 (81 FR 75686, November
1, 2016), (``AD 2016-22-05''), for certain PW PW4164, PW4164-1D,
PW4168, PW4168-1D, PW4168A, PW4168A-1D, and PW4170 turbofan engines. AD
2016-22-05 requires initial and repetitive inspections of the affected
fuel nozzles and their replacement with parts eligible for
installation. AD 2016-22-05 resulted from several instances of fuel
leaks on PW engines installed with the Talon IIB combustion chamber
configuration. We issued AD 2016-22-05 to prevent failure of the fuel
nozzles, which could lead to engine fire and damage to the airplane.

Actions Since AD 2016-22-05 Was Issued

    Since we issued AD 2016-22-05, multiple PW4000 turbofan engines
experienced fuel leaks resulting in engine fires. A subsequent review
of the potential causes identified cracks in the fuel manifold at the
braze joint. As a result, PW published PW Alert Service Bulletin (ASB)
PW4G-100-A73-47, dated March 10, 2017, and PW Service Bulletin (SB)
PW4G-100-73-48, Revision No. 1, dated April 24, 2018, to introduce a
forged fuel nozzle that removes the brazed inlet fitting and adds new
brackets and clamps to the fuel supply manifolds to dampen combustion
chamber vibrations.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed PW ASB PW4G-100-A73-45, dated February 16, 2016; PW ASB
PW4G-100-A73-47, dated March 10, 2017; and PW SB PW4G-100-73-48,
Revision No. 1, dated April 24, 2018. PW ASB PW4G-100-A73-45 describes
procedures for inspecting and replacing the fuel nozzles. PW ASB PW4G-
100-A73-47 describes procedures for replacing the fuel nozzle and
support assembly. PW SB PW4G-100-73-48 describes procedures for
replacing the fuel nozzle manifold assemblies and installing new
brackets and clamps on the manifolds. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would retain all requirements of AD 2016-22-05.
This proposed AD would require initial and repetitive inspections and
replacement of the affected fuel nozzles. This proposed AD would also
require replacement of the affected fuel nozzle supply manifold
assemblies and the installation of new brackets and clamps on the fuel
supply manifold assemblies with parts eligible for installation.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information

    PW ASB PW4G-100-A73-47, dated March 10, 2017, requires the
installation of the new fuel nozzles by April 1, 2019, which is
approximately 24 months from the PW ASB issue date. This AD requires
initial inspection and replacement of failed fuel nozzles before
further flight and installation of new fuel nozzles within 24 months
after the effective date of this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 72 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
               Action                         Labor cost            Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspect fuel nozzles...............  2.2 work-hours x $85 per                 $0            $187         $13,464
                                      hour = $187.
Open and close cowl doors (on-wing)  1 work-hour x $85 per hour                0              85           6,120
                                      = $85.
Remove and replace (24) fuel         48 work-hours x $85 per          423,471.12      427,551.12   30,783,680.64
 nozzles.                             hour = $4,080.
Remove and re-install necessary      23 work-hours x $85 per                   0           1,955         140,760
 hardware according to AMM.           hour = $1,955.
Replace Fuel Supply Manifold Tubes   16 work-hours x $85 per           77,158.97       78,518.97    5,653,365.84
 and install new clamps/brackets.     hour = $1,360.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to engines, propellers, and
associated appliances to the Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2016-22-05, Amendment 39-18694 (81 FR 75686, November 1, 2016), and
adding the following new AD:

Pratt & Whitney Division: Docket No. FAA-2018-0920; Product
Identifier 2016-NE-09-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by January 3,
2019.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2016-22-05, Amendment 39-18694 (81 FR 75686,
November 1, 2016).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Pratt & Whitney Division (PW):
    (1) PW4164, PW4168, and PW4168A model engines that have fuel
nozzles, part number (P/N) 51J345, installed, and that have any of
the following installed: Talon IIB combustion chamber per PW Service
Bulletin (SB) PW4G-100-72-214, dated December 15, 2011; ring case
configuration (RRC) high-pressure compressor (HPC) per PW SB PW4G-
100-72-219, Revision No. 1, dated October 5, 2011, or original
issue; or the outer combustion chamber assembly waspaloy nuts per PW
SB PW4G-100-72-253, dated November 24, 2014;
    (2) PW4168A model engines with Talon IIA outer combustion
chamber assembly, P/N 51J100 or 51J382, and fuel nozzles, P/N
51J345, with serial numbers CGGUA19703 through CGGUA19718,
inclusive, or CGGUA22996 and higher, installed;
    (3) PW4168A-1D and PW4170 model engines with engine serial
numbers P735001 through P735190, inclusive, and fuel nozzles, P/N
51J345, installed; and
    (4) PW4164-1D, PW4168-1D, PW4168A-1D, and PW4170 model engines
that have installed the RRC HPC per PW SB PW4G-100-72-220, Revision
No. 4, dated September 30, 2011, or earlier revision, and have fuel
nozzles, P/N 51J345, installed.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7310, Engine Fuel
Distribution.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by several instances of fuel leaks on PW
engines with the Talon IIB combustion chamber configuration
installed. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the fuel
nozzles. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in
engine fire and damage to the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    (1) Within 800 flight hours (FHs) after December 6, 2016, the
effective date of AD 2016-22-05, or before further flight, whichever
occurs later, and after that within every 800 FHs accumulated on the
fuel nozzles, perform the following:
    (i) Inspect all fuel nozzles, P/N 51J345, in accordance with
Part A, of PW Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) PW4G-100-A73-45, dated
February 16, 2016.
    (ii) For any fuel nozzle that fails the inspection, before
further flight, remove and replace with a part that is eligible for
installation.
    (2) At next shop visit or within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first, perform the following:
    (i) Remove all fuel nozzles, P/N 51J345, in accordance with Part
A, of PW ASB PW4G-100-A73-47, dated March 10, 2017, and replace with
parts eligible for installation.
    (ii) Replace the fuel nozzle manifold supply assemblies and
install the new brackets and clamps on the fuel supply manifolds in
accordance with Accomplishment Instructions, ``For Engines Installed
on Aircraft'' or ``For Engines Not Installed on Aircraft,'' of PW SB
PW4G-100-73-48, Revision No. 1, dated April 24, 2018.

(h) Definitions

    (1) For the purpose of this AD, an ``engine shop visit'' is the
induction of an engine into the shop for maintenance involving the
separation of pairs of major mating engine case flanges, except for
the following situations, which do not constitute an engine shop
visit:
    (i) Separation of engine flanges solely for the purposes of
transportation of the engine without subsequent maintenance.
    (ii) Separation of engine flanges solely for the purpose of
replacing the fan or propulsor without subsequent engine
maintenance.
    (2) For the purpose of this AD, a part that is ``eligible for
installation'' is a fuel nozzle with a P/N other than 51J345 that is
FAA-approved for installation, and that meets the requirements of
Part A, paragraph 5.B., or Part B, paragraph 2, of PW ASB PW4G-100-
A73-47, dated March 10, 2017.

(i) Terminating Action

    Installation of the eligible fuel nozzles, replacement of
manifold supply assemblies, and installation of brackets and clamps
in accordance with (g)(2) of this AD constitutes terminating action
for the repetitive inspection requirements of paragraph (g)(1) of
this AD.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. You may email your
request to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(k) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Scott Hopper,
Aerospace Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Pratt
& Whitney Division, 400 Main St., East Hartford, CT 06108; phone:
860-565-8770; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Standards Branch, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on November 9, 2018.
Karen M. Grant,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-24965 Filed 11-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


                    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

            DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

                    OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

                             WASHINGTON, DC

Issued by the Department of Transportation on November 16, 2007

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET DOT-OST-2002-12259

________________________________________________________________________
______________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Application of US AIRWAYS, INC. (US AIRWAYS) filed 2/24/06 for:

XX Renewal of exemption under 49 U.S.C. §40109 to provide the following
service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail
between a point or points in the United States and a point or points in
Belize.

Applicant rep:   Howard Kass<PHONE_NUMBER>   DOT Analyst:  Thuy H.
Cooper<PHONE_NUMBER>

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX  Granted (subject to conditions, see below)

The above action was effective when taken: November 16, 2007, through
November 16, 2009.

Action taken by: Paul L. Gretch, Director

		    Office of International Aviation

XX  The authority granted is consistent with the U.S.-U.K. Air Services
Agreement, to which Belize acceded upon its independence.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated: XX  Holder’s
certificates of public convenience and necessity

XX  Standard exemption conditions (attached)

________________________________________________________________________
____________________

Remarks: The authority for which US Airways requested renewal expired
April 26, 2006, but has been kept in force pursuant to the provisions of
the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), as implemented by 14
CFR Part 377, pending action on its timely-filed renewal application.

________________________________________________________________________
____________________

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department’s regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted, we denied all requests in the referenced
Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority granted in this
Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR §
385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date of
issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and the
filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this order is available on the World Wide Web
at

  HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov"  http://www.regulations.gov

ATTACHMENT

U.S. Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the U.S. carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, the Transportation Security Administration, and with all
applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning security, including,
but not limited to, 49 CFR Part 1544.  To assure compliance with all
applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning security, the holder
shall, before commencing any new service (including charter flights) to
or from a foreign airport, contact its International Principal Security
Inspector (IPSI) to advise the IPSI of its plans and to find out whether
the Transportation Security Administration has determined that security
is adequate to allow such airport(s) to be served;

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

11/2006


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34101-34102]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14031]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Notice of Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the

Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange
Commission held a Closed Meeting on Monday, June 4, 2012 at 3:00 p.m.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions as set
forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (6), (8) and (9)(A) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(2), (6), (8) and (9)(A) permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who had
an interest in the matters were present.
    Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session, and determined that
no earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matters of the Closed Meeting on June 4, 2012 were a
matter related to financial institutions and markets and a personnel
matter.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed,
please contact the Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: June 5, 2012.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-14031 Filed 6-6-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


  Tribal Chair Addresses and Tribal Contacts for OR Aquatic Life Criteria Consultation/Coordination - November 15, 2012

The Honorable Charlotte Rodrique
Chairperson
Burns Paiute Tribe of the Burns Paiute Indian Colony of Oregon
100 Pasigo Street
Burns, Oregon 97720
Jason Fenton, Environmental Program Manager,<PHONE_NUMBER>, x5<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

The Honorable Mark Ingersoll
Chairman
Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua & Siuslaw Indians
1245 Fulton Avenue
Coos Bay, Oregon 97420
   Margaret Corvi, Interim DNR Director,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>

The Honorable Brenda Meade
Chairperson
Coquille Indian Tribe
3050 Tremont Street
North Bend, Oregon 97459
      Peter Wakeland, NRD Director<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

The Honorable Delores Pigsley
Chairwoman
Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians
P.O. Box 549
Siletz, Oregon 97380
   Mike Kennedy, Natural Resource Manager,<PHONE_NUMBER> ext.1232
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

The Honorable Reyn Leno
Chairman
Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde
9615 Grand Ronde Road
Grand Ronde, Oregon 97347
   Mike Wilson, Natural Resources Director<EMAIL_ADDRESS>   Michael Karnosh, Ceded Lands Coordinator,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>

The Honorable Don Gentry
Chairman
The Klamath Tribes
P.O. Box 436
Chiloquin, Oregon 97624
   Kris Fischer, Aquatic Program Director,<PHONE_NUMBER>, x22<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
The Honorable Gary Burke
Board of Trustees Chairman
Confederated Tribes of Umatilla Indian Reservation
Nixyaawii Governance Center
46411 Timine Way
Pendleton, Oregon 97801
   Robin Harris, Director Water Resources<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Note: Jim Zokan works with Umatilla.

The Honorable Eugene Greene, Jr.
Chairman
Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation
P.O. Box C
Warm Springs, Oregon 97761
   Bobby Brunoe, Director of Natural Resources,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>   Deepak Sehgal, Manager, Tribal Environmental Office,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
The Honorable Dan Courtney
Chairman
Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians
2371 NE Stephens Street
Roseburg, OR 97470
   Amy Amoroso, Natural Resources Director,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
The Honorable Anthony D. Johnson (expires May 2016)
Chairman
Nez Perce Tribe of Idaho
P.O. Box 305
Lapwai, ID 83540
James Holt, Director of Water Resources Department<EMAIL_ADDRESS>      Ken Clark, Water Quality Coordinator<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
The Honorable JoDe L. Goudy
Chairman
Yakama Nation Tribal Council
P.O. Box 151
Toppenish, Washington  98948
      Phil Rigdon, Deputy Director, Yakama Nation Department of Natural Resources
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>509-865-5121, ext, 4655
      Paul Ward, Fisheries Program Director<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

Mr. Paul Lumley								Kristine
Executive Director
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission
700 NE Multnomah St, Suite 1200
Portland, Oregon  97232
      Dianne Barton, Water Quality Coordinator<EMAIL_ADDRESS>      General Line:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Direct Line:<PHONE_NUMBER>


JACOBS & CRUMPLAR, P. A. 2 E. 7th Street P. O. Box 1271 Wilmington, DE 19899 ( 302) 656 5445  ( Phone) ( 302) 656 5875  ( Fax)

November 21, 2003 Information Quality Guidelines Staff Mail Code 28220T, U. S. EPA 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N. W. Washington, DC 20460 Quality. guidelines@ epa. gov RE: ( 1986) EPA " Gold Book" Guidance for Preventing Asbestos Related Disease Among Auto Mechanics To Whom It May Concern:

We represent a large number of people who have been diagnosed with an asbestos related disease from exposure to brakes. Included in this group are a number of people who died from mesothelioma, an incurable cancer whose only known cause is asbestos exposure. I have recently reviewed the request made by Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius to withdraw the EPA report referred as Gold Book. Contrary to what the asbestos defendants may state, we do not use the Gold Book in our asbestos trials.

Withdrawing the Gold Book, however, will have a devastating consequence on our clients, both current and future. First, the withdrawal will enable the defendants to use the removal of the Gold Book to convince the Court and the Jury that the defendants have no liability. Secondly, we are constantly learning of more people being exposed to asbestos containing brakes. Withdrawal of the Gold Book will inevitably cause more asbestos exposure to brakes.

If the EPA improperly withdraws the " Gold Book", I suspect our law firm as well as several other law firms, will take legal action. We will view the withdrawal as a major public health concern.

Sincerely,

/ s/ Thomas C. Crumplar Thomas C. Crumplar TCC/ mpl CC. Senator Joe Biden, Senator Tom Carper, Representative Mike Castle


[Federal Register: October 15, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 198)]
[Notices]
[Page 52961-52963]
[DOCID:fr15oc09-52]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0912, FRL-8969-3]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Notification of Regulated Waste
Activity and 2009 Hazardous Waste Report (Renewal); EPA ICR Number
0976.14; OMB Control Number 2050-0024

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an
existing approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below,
describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated
burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before November 16,
2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-

RCRA-2008-0912, to (1) EPA, either online using http://
www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), or by e-mail to rcra-
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: RCRA Docket (28221T), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460;
and (2) OMB, by mail to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA,
725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Vyas, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On May 15, 2009 (74 FR 22922), EPA sought comments on this ICR
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any additional
comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days
of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0912, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Docket in the EPA Docket Center
(EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for
the RCRA Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, confidential business information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to http://
www.regulations.gov.
    Title: Notification of Regulated Waste Activity and 2009 Hazardous
Waste Report.
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR No. 0976.14, OMB Control No. 2050-0024.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2009.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: This ICR combines two separate ICRs into one: The
biennial ``Hazardous Waste Report'' ICR and the ``Notification of
Regulated Waste Activities'' ICR.
    Both sections 3002 and 3004 of RCRA require EPA to establish
standards for recordkeeping and reporting of hazardous waste generation
and management. Section 3002 applies to hazardous waste generators, and
section 3004 applies to hazardous waste treatment, storage, and
disposal facilities. The implementing regulations are found at 40 CFR
262.40(b) and (d); 262.41(a)(1)-(5), (a)(8), and (b); 264.75(a)-(e) and
(j); 265.75(a)-(e) and (j); and 270.30(l)(9). This is mandatory
reporting by the respondents. This collection is done on a two-year
cycle as required by Sections 3002 and 3004 of RCRA. The information is
collected via a mechanism known as the Hazardous Waste Report for the
required reporting year (EPA Form 8700-13 A/B). This form is also known
as the Biennial Report form.
    The beginning part of the Hazardous Waste Report form is the RCRA
subtitle C Site Identification Form (EPA Form 8700-12). This form is
also a stand alone form which is used to comply with section 3010 of
RCRA, which requires any person who generates or transports regulated
waste or who owns or operates a facility for the treatment, storage, or
disposal of regulated waste to notify EPA of their activities,
including the location and general description of activities and the
regulated wastes handled. This form is also known as the Notification
form.
    EPA has revised the Hazardous Waste Report form this cycle,
particularly the RCRA subtitle C Site Identification portion, because
of recent promulgated rules affecting the RCRA universe, as well as
ongoing efforts by the Agency and States to improve the forms and their
instructions.
    Burden Statement: The reporting burden for the 2009 Hazardous Waste
Report is estimated to average 16.63 hours per respondent, and includes
time for reviewing instructions, gathering data, completing and
reviewing the forms, and submitting the report. The recordkeeping
requirement is estimated to average 3.97 hours per response and
includes the time for filing and storing the 2009 Hazardous Waste
Report submission for three years.
    The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for the
Notification of Regulated Waste Activity is estimated to average 2
hours per response for the initial notification, and 1 hour per
response for any subsequent notifications.
    Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements
which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond
to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by
this action are businesses or other for-profits as well as State,
Local, or Tribal governments.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 56,763.
    Frequency of Response: Biennially.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 422,133 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $16,510,025, includes $16,309,358
annualized labor costs and $200,667 annualized capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 263,063 hours in
the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of
Approved ICR Burdens.

    The decrease in respondent burden for Notification of Regulated
Waste Activity has occurred for two primary reasons. First, there was a
decrease in the estimated total number of notifications under RCRA
section 3010; 40 CFR part 273, subpart C; and 40 CFR part 279. Second,
the burden associated with the notification activities decreased
because of adjustments made to the hourly burden estimates for the Site
ID Form. In addition, adjustments were made to the hourly burden
estimates for the Site ID Form to take into account the option given to
respondents in the Site ID Form's instructions to use their most
recently submitted form in making a subsequent notification. These
optional procedures relieve them of the need to complete the form in
its entirety. These adjustments do not reflect any change in
requirements; they represent instead a more accurate representation of
the burden that respondents will incur as a result of this information
collection.
    The decrease in respondent burden and State agency burden estimates
for the Hazardous Waste Report occurred because there was a decrease in
the projected number of respondents and Hazardous Waste Report forms.

    Dated: October 8, 2009.
John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E9-24814 Filed 10-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 168 (Friday, August 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 51635]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20737]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

In the Matter of Clavis Technologies International Co., Ltd.;
Order of Suspension of Trading

August 27, 2014.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Clavis Technologies International Co., Ltd. because it has not filed
any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2011.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is ordered,
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that
trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for
the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on August 27, 2014, through 11:59 p.m.
EDT on September 10, 2014.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-20737 Filed 8-27-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74113-74115]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29239]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2011-0059]

Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories
Standard; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB)
Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comments concerning its proposal to
extend OMB approval of the information collection requirements
specified in the Standard on Occupational Exposure to Hazardous
Chemicals in Laboratories.

DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by
February 13, 2015.

ADDRESSES:
    Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting
comments.
    Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
    Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service:
When using this method, you must submit your comments and attachments
to the

OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-2011-0059, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger, and courier service) are
accepted during the Department of Labor's and Docket Office's normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and the
OSHA docket number (OSHA-2011-0059) for the Information Collection
Request (ICR). All comments, including any personal information you
provide, are placed in the public docket without change, and may be
made available online at http://www.regulations.gov. For further
information on submitting comments see the ``Public Participation''
heading in the section of this notice titled ``SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.''
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at
the address above. All documents in the docket (including this Federal
Register notice) are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index;
however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly
available to read or download from the Web site. All submissions,
including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and
copying at the OSHA Docket Office. You may also contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of the ICR.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theda Kenney or Todd Owen, Directorate
of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-3609,
200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 693-
2222.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information
collection requirements in accord with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (PRA-95)(44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that
information is in the desired format, reporting burden (time and costs)
is minimal, collection instruments are clearly understood, and OSHA's
estimate of the information collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651
et seq.) authorizes information collection by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the OSH Act or for developing
information regarding the causes and prevention of occupational
injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also
requires that OSHA obtain such information with minimum burden upon
employers, especially those operating small businesses, and to reduce
to the maximum extent feasible unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
    The Standard entitled ``Occupational Exposure to Hazardous
Chemicals in Laboratories'' (29 CFR 1910.1450; the ``Standard'')
applies to laboratories that use hazardous chemicals in accord with the
Standard's definitions for ``laboratory use of hazardous chemicals''
and ``laboratory scale.'' The Standard requires these laboratories to
maintain worker exposures at or below the permissible exposure limits
specified for the hazardous chemicals in 29 CFR part 1910, subpart Z.
The laboratories do so by developing a written Chemical Hygiene Plan
(CHP) that describes the following: standard operating procedures for
using hazardous chemicals; hazard-control techniques; equipment-
reliability measures; worker information and training programs;
conditions under which the employer must approve operations,
procedures, and activities before implementation; and medical
consultations and examinations. The CHP also designates personnel
responsible for implementing the CHP, and specifies the procedures to
be used to provide additional protection to workers exposed to
particularly hazardous chemicals.
    Other information collection requirements of the Standard include:
documenting exposure monitoring results; notifying workers in writing
of these results; presenting specified information and training to
workers; establishing a medical surveillance program for overexposed
workers; providing required information to the physician; obtaining the
physician's written opinion on using proper respiratory equipment; and
establishing, maintaining, transferring, and disclosing exposure
monitoring and medical records. These collection of information
requirements, including the CHP, control worker overexposure to
hazardous laboratory chemicals, thereby preventing serious illnesses
and death among workers exposed to such chemicals.

II. Special Issues for Comment

    OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
     Whether the proposed information collection requirements
are necessary for the proper performance of the Agency's functions to
protect workers, including whether the information is useful;
     The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
     Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply;
for example, by using automated or other technological information
collection and transmission techniques.

III. Proposed Actions

    OSHA is proposing to extend the information collection requirements
contained in the Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in
Laboratories Standard (29 CFR 1910.1450). The Agency is requesting to
increase the existing burden hour estimate for the collection of
information requirements in the Standard. In this regard, the Agency is
requesting to adjust the current burden hour estimate from 293,373 to
332,350 hours a total increase of 38,977 hours.
    Type of Review: Extension of currently approved collections.
    Title: Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in
Laboratories.
    OMB Number: 1218-0131.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profits.
    Number of Respondents: 64,404.
    Frequency of Responses: Annually; monthly, quarterly, semi-
annually, on occasion.
    Total Responses: 990,403.
    Average Time per Response: Varies from 3 minutes (.05 hour) to
replace the safe practice manual to 1 hour to develop a new manual.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 332,350.
    Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $0.

IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on this Notice and
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions

    You may submit comments in response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other material must identify the Agency name

and the OSHA docket number (Docket No. OSHA-2011-0059) for the ICR. You
may supplement electronic submissions by uploading document files
electronically. If you wish to mail additional materials in reference
to an electronic or a facsimile submission, you must submit them to the
OSHA Docket Office (see the section of this notice titled ADDRESSES).
The additional materials must clearly identify your electronic comments
by your name, date, and the docket number so the Agency can attach them
to your comments.
    Because of security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the delivery of materials by hand,
express delivery, messenger or courier service, please contact the OSHA
Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>).
    Comments and submissions are posted without change at http://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about
submitting personal information such as social security numbers and
date of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index, some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to read or download from this Web
site. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available
for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. Information on
using the http://www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments and
access the docket is available at the Web site's ``User Tips'' link.
Contact the OSHA Docket Office for information about materials not
available from the Web site, and for assistance in using the Internet
to locate docket submissions.

V. Authority and Signature

    David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this
notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012
(77 FR 3912).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on December 9, 2014.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2014-29239 Filed 12-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 11 (Thursday, January 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2921-2922]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00689]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-71284; File No. SR-BATS-2014-002]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Extend
the Applicability of the Competitive Liquidity Provider Program

January 10, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on January 3, 2014, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BATS'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend Interpretation and Policy
.02 to Rule 11.8, entitled ``Competitive Liquidity Provider Program.''
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at http://www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing is to amend Interpretation and Policy
.02 to Rule 11.8 in order to allow both corporate issues and ETPs \3\
listed on the Exchange (collectively, ``CLP Securities'') to
participate in the CLP program (the ``Program'') for a maximum of three
years instead of two years. Currently, a CLP Security is eligible to
participate in the Program unless and until such CLP Security has: (i)
Had a consolidated average daily volume (``CADV'') of equal to or
greater than 2 million shares for two consecutive calendar months; or
(ii) where the CLP Security has been subject to the Program for two
years. The Exchange is proposing to extend the period during which a
CLP Security is eligible for participation in the Program from two
years to three years and to make the necessary corresponding changes so
that a CLP Security will still be ineligible for participation in the
Program where it has a CADV of equal to or greater than 2 million
shares for two consecutive calendar months.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ As defined in paragraph (d)(2) of Interpretation and Policy
.02 to Rule 11.8, ETPs means any-Exchange listed security that is
listed on the Exchange pursuant to Rule 14.11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    When the Program was first proposed,\4\ the Exchange did not want
to allow CLP Securities to participate in the Program indefinitely and,
thus, needed to create a threshold for CLP Securities at which point
they would no longer be eligible for the Program. The Exchange decided
to implement a two year limit on the basis that it was a reasonable
length of time during which the Exchange could evaluate the Program and
its listings program generally. Since the Program was implemented, the
Program has been at least partly responsible for attracting and
retaining the listing of certain CLP Securities on the Exchange and the
Exchange believes that allowing CLP Securities to continue to
participate in the Program is integral to continue to expand the
listings program and to retain existing listings. As such, the Exchange
is proposing to extend the maximum eligibility window for CLP
Securities to three years from the date of the CLP Security has been
subject to the Program. The Exchange is proposing that these changes
apply both to newly listed CLP Securities and CLP Securities already
listed on the Exchange, meaning that any CLP Securities currently
listed on the Exchange will also be eligible for participation in the
Program for an additional year.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Exchange Act Release No. 66307 (February 2, 2012), 77 FR
6608 (February 8, 2012) (SR-BATS-2011-051).
    \5\ The first Exchange-listed securities began participating in
the Program on February 9, 2012 and, under the current rules, would
be ineligible for participation in the Program beginning on February
9, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular,
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\6\ Specifically, the
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \7\ because it
would promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general,
protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that
the proposal is not unfairly discriminatory because it is merely a
continuation of the Program as it is implemented today and will apply
equally to all participating CLP Securities and issuers. The Exchange
believes that lengthening the period during which a CLP Security is
eligible for the Program will continue to encourage the development of
new financial products, provide a better trading environment for
investors in Exchange-listed securities, and generally encourage
greater competition between listing venues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposal is designed to maintain and further enhance the
Exchange's competitiveness as a listing venue and its market quality
for Exchange-listed securities. The Exchange believes that the proposed
change will enhance market quality by extending the period of
eligibility for CLP Securities to participate in the Program, which
will further incent Exchange Market Makers to register as CLPs and
quote in Exchange-listed securities, thus maintaining or improving the
quality of quoting in Exchange-listed securities subject to the Program
and helping to reduce imbalances in Exchange auctions. The Exchange
also believes that the proposed change will further assist the Exchange
in competing as a listing venue by providing an even longer window
during which the Program is applied and competitive quoting is incented
on the Exchange. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the proposal
will enhance the existing Program for CLP Securities subject to the
Program, which will, in turn, provide issuers of CLP Securities with
another option for raising capital in the public markets, thereby
promoting the principles discussed in Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition.
The

Exchange believes that the proposal will extend the period during which
CLP Securities will be eligible to participate in the Program and which
will enhance the result of the Program, thereby enhancing competition
both among listing venues as well as among participants in the CLP
Program.

(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule
change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act
\9\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is
consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the
following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-BATS-2014-002 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-BATS-2014-002. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule changes between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing will also be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-BATS-2014-002 and should be
submitted on or before February 6, 2014.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-00689 Filed 1-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 219 (Tuesday, November 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67639-67640]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27506]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP13-10-000]

Liberty Energy (Georgia) Corp.; Notice of Application

    Take notice that on October 25, Liberty Energy (Georgia) Corp.
(Liberty Georgia), 2845 Bristol Circle, Oakville, Ontario, Canada L6H
7H7, filed in Docket No. CP13-10-000, an application pursuant to
section 7(f) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) requesting the determination
of a service area within which Liberty Georgia may, without further
Commission authorization, enlarge or expand its natural gas
distribution facilities. Liberty Georgia also requests: (i) A waiver of
the Commission's accounting and reporting requirements and other
regulatory requirements ordinarily applicable to natural gas companies
under the NGA and the NGPA; (ii) pregranted abandonment of this
service; and (iii) such further relief the Commission may deem
appropriate, all as more fully set forth in the application, which is
on file with the Commission and open to public inspection. The filing
may also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-
free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Liberty Georgia, a newly created entity, states that it agreed on
August 8, 2012, to purchase natural gas distribution assets owned by
Atmos Energy Corporation (Atmos) in Georgia.\1\ Liberty Georgia now
seeks a section 7(f) service area determination in order to provide
natural gas service to approximately 64,000 customers in Georgia. The
purchased Georgia facilities will include approximately 1,313 miles of
gas transmission and distribution mains in Barrow, Chattahoochee, Hall,
Harris, Jackson, Muscogee, and Oconee Counties. The Georgia facilities
also include the distribution systems serving Columbus, Georgia, and
Gainesville, Georgia.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Atmos Energy Corp., 126 FERC ] 62,118 (2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Liberty Georgia states that it would also acquire from Atmos (i)
approximately 7,078 feet of 6-inch diameter pipeline (ii) 14,040 feet
of 6-inch diameter pipeline, and (iii) approximately 14,150 feet of 10-
inch pipeline that extend from an interconnection with Southern Natural
Gas Company in Russell County, Alabama, to the Alabama-Georgia border
at the northern bank of the Chattahoochee River (Alabama facilities),
where they interconnect with Atmos' Georgia facilities that serve the
distribution system on the U.S. Army base at Fort Benning, Georgia.
    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to
William F. Demarest, Jr., Husch Blackwell LLP, 750 17th St. NW., Suite
900, Washington, DC 20006, or at<PHONE_NUMBER> (telephone) or email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's

environmental review process. Environmental commenters will not be
required to serve copies of filed documents on all other parties.
However, the non-party commenters will not receive copies of all
documents filed by other parties or issued by the Commission (except
for the mailing of environmental documents issued by the Commission)
and will not have the right to seek court review of the Commission's
final order.
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing''
link.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on Tuesday, November 27, 2012.

    Dated: November 6, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-27506 Filed 11-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


 MEMORANDUM

DATE:06/04/2014 FROM: 		Laura Farris/EPA Region 8 TO:CLEAN Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR - 2013-0602 SUBJECT:UTAH Governor's Energy Summit held on 06/04/2014

SUMMARY:

EPA Region 8 attended the Utah Governor's Energy Summit held on 06/04/2014 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

External Stakeholders Members of the Public and Press

ATTACHMENTS Clean Power Plan PowerPoint slides.