[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 24465]
[FR Doc No: 2018-11383]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL18-144-000]

St. Joseph Energy Center, LLC; Notice of Institution of Section
206 Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On May 21, 2018, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. EL18-
144-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16
U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into whether St.
Joseph Energy Center, LLC's rates for Reactive Service may be unjust
and unreasonable. St. Joseph Energy Center, LLC, 163 FERC ] 61, 130
(2018).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL18-144-000, established
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication
of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL18-144-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21
days of the date of issuance of the order.

    Dated: May 22, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-11383 Filed 5-25-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


3 The annual number of respondents for the 2003 Biennial Report ( 10,178) is based on the total number of large quantity generators responding to the 2001 Hazardous Waste Report ( i. e., 20,356 divided by 2).

19 6( d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Cost EPA estimates that the total number of respondents to the 2003 Biennial Report will be approximately 20,356, which annualized over the two year report cycle equals 10,178 per year. 3 We considered other methods of estimating the number of responses ( such as looking at the number of respondents in past Biennial Reports, but the numbers fluctuated, and we could not develop projections). The number of respondents and forms for each respondent activity is presented below. These estimates assume that all questions and forms are submitted in accordance with the Biennial Report instructions. Exhibit 1 calculates the annual respondent burden and cost for the activities examined.

Read the Instructions EPA estimates that all 20,356 respondents will read the instructions to the 2003 Biennial Report. Annualized over the two year report cycle, this results in 10,178 facilities reading the instructions each year.

Gather Information and Prepare Site Identification Form EPA estimates that all 20,356 respondents will prepare and submit a Site Identification Form with the 2003 Biennial Report. Annualized over the two year report cycle, this results in 10,178 respondents preparing and submitting a Site Identification Form each year. EPA further assumes that 50 percent of forms will be pre populated by States, in which case respondents need only review and update the data. Respondents receiving blank forms will need to complete the form. EPA estimates that, on average, a pre populated Site Identification Form will take about 0.5 hours to update and a blank Site Identification Form will take about 0.7 hours to prepare. Thus, on average, EPA assumes each respondent will take about 0.6 hours ( weighted average) to update/ prepare a Site Identification Form.

Gather Information and Prepare Form GM EPA anticipates that each year 10,178 respondents will submit 116,901 GM Forms to EPA. EPA estimates that, on average, a Form GM will take about 1.26 hours to prepare manually and 0.08 hours to prepare electronically. EPA further assumes that 30 percent of forms will be prepared manually and 70 percent will be prepared electronically. Thus, on average, EPA assumes each respondent will take about 0.43 hours ( weighted average) to prepare each Form GM. 4 The annual number of respondents submitting 2001 Forms WR ( 272) is based on the total number of respondents submitting Forms WR for the 1997 Biennial Report ( i. e., 543/ 2).

20 Gather Information and Prepare Form WR EPA expects that each year 272 ( 543/ 2) respondents will each submit a total of 377,172 Forms WR to EPA. 4 Note that the number of WR Forms represents the number of blocks on Form WR that have been completed; the paper form actually contains three blocks of the same WR information ( i. e., the same questions, repeated three times on the same page). EPA estimates that a Form WR will take, on average, about 1.31 hours to prepare manually and 0.13 hours to prepare electronically. EPA further assumes that 10 percent of forms will be prepared manually and 90 percent will be prepared electronically. Thus, on average, EPA assumes each respondent will take about 0.25 hours ( weighted average) to prepare each Form WR.

Gather Information and Prepare Form OI Because this form is a State optional form, EPA does not expect any facilities to submit Form OI and therefore does not calculate the burden for this form.

Submit the Biennial Report to State/ Region EPA expects each respondent, 10,178 facilities per year, to submit the report to the appropriate State or Region.

Maintain a Copy of Each Form EPA expects facilities to retain an estimated 505,251 ( 10,178 + 116,901 + 377,172) forms each year.

6( e) Bottom Line Burden and Cost Tables Respondent Tally Exhibit 3 presents the bottom line respondent burden and costs associated with the 2003 Biennial Report. EPA estimates that respondents will incur an annual burden of 196,976 hours and a cost of $ 10,311,438. Exhibit 3 also presents cost estimates by type ( labor, capital/ startup, or O& M) as well as two year totals for burden and costs ( to reflect the overall burden and costs incurred by respondents over the two year period covered by this ICR). 21 EXHIBIT 3 THE 2003 BIENNIAL REPORT TOTAL ESTIMATED RESPONDENT BURDEN AND COST SUMMARY ( FROM EXHIBIT 1)

Burden Labor Cost Capital/ Startup Cost O& M Cost Total Cost Annual Total 196,976 $ 10,286,102 $ 0 $ 25,336 $ 10,311,438 2 Year Total 393,952 $ 20,572,204 $ 0 $ 50,673 $ 20,622,877 Agency Tally Exhibit 4 presents the bottom line Agency burden and costs associated with the 2003 Biennial Report. EPA estimates an Agency annual burden of 232,820 hours and a cost of $ 7,750,798. Exhibit 4 also presents cost estimates by type ( labor, capital/ startup, or O& M) as well as two year totals for burden and costs ( to reflect the overall burden and costs incurred by the Agency over the two year period covered by this ICR).

EXHIBIT 4 THE 2003 BIENNIAL REPORT TOTAL ESTIMATED AGENCY/ STATE BURDEN AND COST SUMMARY ( FROM EXHIBIT 2)

Burden Labor Cost Capital/ Startup Cost O& M Cost Total Cost Annual Total 232,820 $ 7,750,798 $ 0 $ 370,236 $ 8,121,034 2 Year Total 465,640 $ 15,501,596 $ 0 $ 740,471 $ 16,242,067 6( f) Reasons For Change In Burden As shown in Exhibit 3, the overall ( two year) burden estimate for the 2003 Hazardous Waste Report is 393,952 hours. Based on reported data for the 2001Hazardous Waste Report, EPA estimates a slight increase of 3,524 hours from the estimated burden of the 2001Hazardous Waste Report ( 390,428 hours). This change in burden has occurred for several reasons. Based on reported data for the 2001Hazardous Waste Report, EPA estimates a slight increase in the number of respondents, an additional 42; we estimate the increase in the number of submitted forms to be 15,218. The completion of the RCRA Subtitle C Site Identification Form will require an estimated additional 20 minutes. This has resulted in a minor increase of 2% in the time to complete the report.

6( g) Burden Statement The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 19.35 hours per response. The annual reporting burden is estimated to average 16.87 hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, gathering data, completing and reviewing the forms, and submitting the report. The annual recordkeeping 22 requirement is estimated to average 2.48 hours per respondent including the time for filing and storing the Biennial Report submission for three years. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15. To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number RCRA 2002 0024, which is available for public viewing at the RCRA Docket in the EPA Docket Center ( EPA/ DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4: 30 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is ( 202) 566 1744, and the telephone number for the RCRA Docket is ( 202) 566 0270. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA Dockets ( EDOCKET) at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket. Use EDOCKET to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select " search," then key in the docket ID number identified above. Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Office for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number RCRA 2002 0024 and OMB Control Number 2050 0024 in any correspondence.


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 7, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 69181-69182]
[FR Doc No: 2021-26418]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 7, 2021 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-1049; Airspace Docket No. 21-ASO-36]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Hampton, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface for Atlanta Speedway Airport
(formerly Clayton County-Tara Field) by updating the airport's name and
updating the geographical coordinates to coincide with the FAA's
database. Also, during a review of the airspace, it was determined that
an increase in the radius was needed. This action would also remove
excessive verbiage from the legal description of the airport.
Controlled airspace is necessary for the safety and management of
instrument flight rules (IFR) operations in the area.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 21, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to: the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify the
Docket No. FAA-2021-1049; Airspace Docket No. 21-ASO-36 at the
beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; Telephone: (202) 267-
8783. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of FAA Order JO 7400.11F at NARA, email
[email protected] or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  John Goodson, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106,
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority,
as it would amend Class E airspace for Hampton, GA to support IFR
operations in the area.

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to comment on this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (Docket No. FAA-
2021-1049 and Airspace Docket No. 21-ASO-36) and be submitted in
triplicate to DOT Docket Operations (see ADDRESSES section for the
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    Persons wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on
this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2021-1049; Airspace Docket No. 21-ASO-36.'' The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this document may be changed in light of the
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the comment
closing date. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined between 8:00 a.m. and
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays, at the
office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration,
Room 350, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective
September 15, 2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as
listed

in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA proposes an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to amend Class E
airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Atlanta
Speedway Airport (formerly Clayton County-Tara Field), Hampton, GA by
updating the airports name and updating the geographical coordinates of
the airport to coincide with the FAA's database. This action would also
increase the radius to 9.2 miles (formerly 6.8 miles) and eliminate
excessive verbiage in the legal description.
    Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraphs 6005 of
FAA Order JO 7400.11F, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September
15, 2021, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class
E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in FAA Order JO 7400.11.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'', prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO GA E5 Hampton, GA [Amended]

Atlanta Speedway Airport, GA
    (Lat. 33[deg]23'24'' N. long. 84[deg]19'52'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 9.2-mile radius of Atlanta Speedway Airport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on December 1, 2021.
Andreese C. Davis,
Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2021-26418 Filed 12-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57501-57502]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22744]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2012-0465; FRL-9827-9]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Amendments to Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program for
Wisconsin

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a state implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources on June 7,
2012, concerning the state's vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M)
program in southeast Wisconsin. The revision amends I/M program
requirements in the active control measures portion of the ozone SIP to
reflect changes that have been implemented at the state level since EPA
fully approved the I/M program on August 16, 2001. The submittal also
includes a demonstration under section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) addressing lost emission reductions associated with the program
changes.

DATES: This final rule is effective on October 21, 2013.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2012-0465. All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not
placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Francisco J. Acevedo,
Mobile Source Program Manager, at<PHONE_NUMBER>, before visiting the
Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Francisco J. Acevedo, Mobile Source
Program Manager, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. What is being addressed by this document?
II. What comments did we receive on the proposed rule?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What is being addressed by this document?

    On April 25, 2013, at 78 FR 24373, EPA proposed to approve into the
state's Federally-approved SIP several regulatory changes to the
previously approved I/M program operating in southeast Wisconsin. The
most significant changes to the Wisconsin I/M program took effect
beginning on July 2008 and include:
     The elimination of I/M program testing requirements for
vehicles not equipped with computerized second generation on-board
diagnostic systems. This change impacted model year (MY) 1968 through
1995 vehicles. These vehicles were previously subject to tailpipe
testing.
     The elimination of I/M program testing requirements for
gasoline vehicles with gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) between 8,500
to 10,000 pounds (lbs). This change impacted MY 1996 through 2006
vehicles. Previously, all vehicles up to 10,000 lbs were subject to
testing.
     The addition of I/M program testing requirements for
gasoline vehicles with a GVWR of 10,000 to 14,000 lbs. This change
impacted MY 2007 and later vehicles.
     The addition of I/M program testing requirements for
diesel vehicles with a GVWR up to 14,000 lbs. This change impacted MY
2007 and later vehicles.
    In addition to the changes discussed above, EPA is approving a
number of minor revisions to the program that do not have a significant
impact on overall program operations or the emissions reductions
associated with it. A full list of the changes submitted by Wisconsin
for EPA approval include:
     Revisions to Section 100.20, Wisconsin Statutes (2001
Wisconsin Act 16, published August 31, 2001; 2003 Wisconsin Act 220,
published April 22, 2003; 2005 Wisconsin Act 49, published October 27,
2005; 2007 Wisconsin Act 20, published October 26, 2007; 2009 Wisconsin
Act 228, published May 19, 2010);
     revisions to Section 285.30, Wisconsin Statutes (2003
Wisconsin Act 192, published April 21, 2004; 2007 Wisconsin Act 20,
published October 26, 2007; 2007 Wisconsin Act 33, published December
3, 2007; 2009 Wisconsin Act 157, published March 24, 2010; 2009
Wisconsin Act 311, published May 26, 2010);
     revisions to Wisconsin Administrative Code, Chapter NR 485
(Clearinghouse Rule CR 05-072 effective April 1, 2006; Clearinghouse
Rule CR 10-049 effective December 1, 2010);
     revisions to Wisconsin Administrative Code, Chapter Trans
131 (Clearinghouse Rule CR 01-121 effective April 1, 2002;
Clearinghouse Rule CR 07-114 effective July 1, 2008; Clearinghouse Rule
CR 10-088 effective January 1, 2011).

II. What comments did we receive on the proposed rule?

    EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period. The comment period
closed on May 28, 2013. EPA received no adverse comments.

III. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is approving the revisions to the Wisconsin ozone SIP submitted
on June 7, 2012, concerning the I/M program in southeast Wisconsin. EPA
finds that the revisions meet all applicable requirements and will not
interfere with reasonable further progress or attainment of any of the
national ambient air quality standards.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 18, 2013. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone,
Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: June 12, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. Section 52.2570 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(128) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.2570  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (128) On June 7, 2012, the Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources submitted a request to revise Wisconsin's vehicle inspection
and maintenance (I/M) program to reflect changes that have been made to
the program since EPA fully approved the I/M program on August 16,
2001.
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) Wisconsin Administrative Code, NR 485.01 Applicability;
purpose, as published in the Wisconsin Administrative Register May
1992, No. 437, effective June 1, 1992.
    (B) Wisconsin Administrative Code, NR 485.02 Definitions, NR 485.04
Motor vehicle emission limitations; exemptions, and NR 485.045 Repair
cost limit for vehicle inspection program, as published in the
Wisconsin Administrative Register November 2010, No. 659, effective
December 1, 2010.
    (C) Wisconsin Administrative Code, NR 485.06 Tampering with air
pollution control equipment, as published in the Wisconsin
Administrative Register March 2006, No. 603, effective April 1, 2006.
    (D) Wisconsin Administrative Code, NR 485.07 Inspection requirement
for motor vehicle tampering, as published in the Wisconsin
Administrative Register January 1997, No. 493, effective February 1,
1997.
    (E) Wisconsin Administrative Code, Trans 131.01 Purpose and scope,
Trans 131.02 Definitions, Trans 131.03 Emission inspection and
reinspection, Trans 131.04 Waiver of compliance, Trans 131.05 Waiver
emission equipment inspection, Trans 131.06 Inspection compliance,
Trans 131.07 Voluntary inspections, Trans 131.11 Audits of inspection
facilities, Trans 131.12 Equipment specifications and quality control,
Trans 131.13 Licensing of inspectors, Trans 131.14 Remote sensing,
Trans 131.15 Performance monitoring of repair facilities, as published
in the Wisconsin Administrative Register December 2010, No. 660,
effective January 01, 2011.
    (F) Wisconsin Administrative Code, Trans 131.08 Letter of temporary
exemption from emission inspection requirements, and Trans 131.10
Reciprocity, as published in the Wisconsin Administrative Register
March 2002, No. 555, effective April 01, 2002.
    (G) Wisconsin Administrative Code, Trans 131.09 Temporary operating
permits, and Trans 131.16 Automotive emission repair technician
training, as published in the Wisconsin Administrative Register June
2008, No. 630, effective July 01, 2008.
    (H) Wisconsin Administrative Code, Trans 131.17 Notification of
inspection requirements, as published in the Wisconsin Administrative
Register April 1996, No. 484, effective May 01, 1996.
    (I) Wisconsin Statutes, section 110.20 Motor vehicle emission
inspection and maintenance program, as revised by 2009 Wisconsin Act
228, enacted on May 5, 2010. (A copy of 2009 Wisconsin Act 228 is
attached to section 110.20 to verify the enactment date.)
    (J) Wisconsin Statutes, section 285.30 Motor vehicle emissions
limitations; inspections, as revised by 2009 Wisconsin Act 311, enacted
on May 12, 2010. (A copy of 2009 Wisconsin Act 311 is attached to
section 285.30 to verify the enactment date.)

[FR Doc. 2013-22744 Filed 9-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 28, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22336-22338]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9839]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2010-0214]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; North Jetty, Named the Barview Jetty, Tillamook Bay,
OR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes the establishment of a safety zone
surrounding the north jetty, named the Barview Jetty near Tillamook
Bay, Oregon. The safety zone is necessary to help ensure the safety of
work crews and the maritime public while the jetty is being repaired
and will do so by prohibiting all persons and vessels from entering or
remaining within 250 feet of the jetty unless specifically authorized
by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 28, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2010-0214 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail MST1 Jaime Sayers, Waterways Management Division,
Coast Guard Sector Portland; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2010-0214), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via http://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via http://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2010-0214'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2010-0214'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.

Basis and Purpose

    The north jetty, named the Barview Jetty, near Tillamook Bay,
Oregon has deteriorated to the point that the United States Army Corps
of Engineers has contracted Kiewit Corporation to repair the jetty. The
repairs will begin in June 2010 and will involve the use of a track
mounted Manitowoc 18,000 lb crane with as much as 200 feet of boom. The
crane will be used to move large granite boulders weighing
approximately 20 to 50 tons each by lifting them up, circling them out
over the waterway on either side of the north jetty, and placing them
into the jetty.
    Due to the inherent dangers associated with such operations, the
Coast Guard is proposing the establishment of a safety zone covering
all waters within 250 feet in every direction of the north jetty, named
the Barview Jetty. The safety zone will help ensure the safety of work
crews and the maritime public while the jetty is being repaired by
prohibiting all persons and vessels from entering or remaining in the
zone unless specifically authorized

by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The proposed safety zone created by this rule will be in effect
from 12:01 a.m. June 15, 2010 until 11:59 p.m. September 30, 2010. The
proposed safety zone will cover all waters within 250 feet in every
direction of the north jetty, named the Barview Jetty, near Tillamook
Bay, Oregon starting at latitude 45[deg]34'12'' N, longitude
123[deg]57'31'' W; thence heading offshore to latitude 45[deg]34'12''
N, longitude 123[deg]57'02'' W; thence across the tip of the jetty to
latitude 45[deg]34'17.5'' N, longitude 123[deg]57'02'' W; thence back
inland to latitude 45[deg]34'15'' N, longitude 123[deg]57'31'' W. All
persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering or remaining in
the zone unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative. Unless other safety concerns exist,
maritime traffic will generally be given permission to transit the zone
when work is not actively being conducted.
    The Coast Guard expects the temporary final rule will be effective
less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register because
delaying the effective date would be contrary to the public interest
due to the need to protect the public from the dangers associated with
construction projects, such as the use of heavy machinery in jetty
repair operations.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. Although this proposed
regulation restricts access to the safety zone, the effect of the rule
will not be significant because: (i) The safety zone will only be in
effect during the 3\1/2\ months repairs are being made to the north
jetty, named the Barview Jetty; (ii) the zone is of limited size; and
(iii) maritime traffic will be able to transit the zone with the
permission of the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule may affect the following entities
some of which may be small entities: The owners and operators of
vessels intending to operate in the area covered by the safety zone.
The safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, however, because the safety zone
will only be in effect during the 3\1/2\ months repairs are being made
to the north jetty, named the Barview Jetty, and maritime traffic will
be able to transit the zone with the permission of the Captain of the
Port or his designated representative.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact MST1 Jaime Sayers at phone
number<PHONE_NUMBER> or by e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast
Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed
rule involves the establishment of a safety zone. We seek any comments
or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

    1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

    2. Add Sec.  165.T13-137 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T13-137  Safety Zone; North Jetty, Named the Barview Jetty,
Tillamook Bay, OR.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters
within 250 feet in every direction of the north jetty, named the
Barview Jetty, near Tillamook Bay, Oregon starting at latitude
45[deg]34'12'' N, longitude 123[deg]57'31'' W; thence heading offshore
to latitude 45[deg]34'12'' N, longitude 123[deg]57'02'' W; thence
across the tip of the jetty to latitude 45[deg]34'17.5'' N, longitude
123[deg]57'02'' W; thence back inland to latitude 45[deg]34'15'' N,
longitude 123[deg]57'31'' W.
    (b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR Part 165, Subpart C, no person may enter or remain in the safety
zone created in paragraph (a) of this section or bring, cause to be
brought, or allow to remain in the safety zone created in paragraph (a)
of this section any vehicle, vessel or object unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
    (c) Effective Period. The safety zone created in paragraph (a) of
this section will be in effect from 12:01 a.m. June 15, 2010 until
11:59 p.m. September 30, 2010.

    Dated: April 14, 2010.
F.G. Myer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Portland.
[FR Doc. 2010-9839 Filed 4-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P