[Federal Register: October 20, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 202)]
[Notices]
[Page 64721-64722]
[DOCID:fr20oc10-55]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

October 8, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER10-2260-001.
    Applicants: Cabrillo Power I LLC.
    Description: Cabrillo Power I LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Cabrillo I--Amendment to Market-Based Rate Tariffs to be effective 10/
11/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101008-5096.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2261-001.
    Applicants: Cabrillo Power II LLC.
    Description: Cabrillo Power II LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Cabrillo Power II--Amendment to Market-Based Rate Tariffs to be
effective 10/11/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101008-5099.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2263-001.
    Applicants: El Segundo Power II LLC.
    Description: El Segundo Power II LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
El Segundo Power II--Amendment to Market-Based Rate Tariffs to be
effective 10/11/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101008-5111.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2264-001.
    Applicants: Long Beach Generation LLC.
    Description: Long Beach Generation LLC submits tariff filing per
35: Long Beach Generation--Amendment to Market-Based Rate Tariffs to be
effective 10/11/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101008-5118.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-29-000.
    Applicants: Safe Harbor Water Power Corporation.
    Description: Safe Harbor Water Power Corporation requests an
extension of time until 11/1/10 to submit the baseline tariff filing of
its cost-based rate etc.
    Filed Date: 10/04/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101004-0041.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 25, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-54-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii:
Cedar Creek E&P Agreement to be effective 9/15/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/07/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101007-5131.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 28, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-55-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii:
Logan City Construction Agreement to be effective 12/7/2010).
    Filed Date: 10/07/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101007-5132.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 28, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-56-000.
    Applicants: Enjet, Inc.
    Description: Enjet, Inc. submits tariff filing per 35.12: Baseline
to be effective 10/7/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/07/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101007-5133.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 28, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-57-000.
    Applicants: Black Hills Power, Inc.
    Description: Black Hills Power, Inc. submits its Spinning Reserve
Service Agreement, to be effective 10/9/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101008-5002.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-60-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: ISA No. 2654, T42, among PJM, PSEG Fossil and PSEG
Company to be effective 9/17/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101008-5042.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-61-000.
    Applicants: 3Degrees Group, Inc.
    Description: 3Degrees Group, Inc. submits tariff filing per 35.12:
3Degrees FERC Electric MBR Filing to be effective 10/8/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101008-5077.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-64-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: 10-8-10 Attachment L Credit
Cap Filing to be effective 12/8/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101008-5128.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-65-000.
    Applicants: Capitol District Energy Center Cogeneration Associates.
    Description: Capitol District Energy Center Cogeneration Associates
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: Revised Market-Based Rate
Tariff Filing to be effective 10/9/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101008-5129.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-66-000.
    Applicants: Saguaro Power Company LP.
    Description: Saguaro Power Company LP submits tariff filing per
35.12: Saguaro Power--Amendment to Market-Based Rate Tariffs to be
effective 10/11/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101008-5130.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 29, 2010.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    As it relates to any qualifying facility filings, the notices of
self-certification [or self-recertification] listed above, do not
institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status. A notice
of self-certification [or self-recertification] simply provides
notification that the entity making the filing has determined the
facility named in the notice meets the applicable criteria to be a
qualifying facility. Intervention and/or protest do not lie in dockets
that are qualifying facility self-certifications or self-
recertifications. Any person seeking to challenge such qualifying
facility status may do so by filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR
292.207(d)(iii). Intervention and protests may be filed in response to
notices of qualifying facility dockets other than self-certifications
and self-recertifications.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26370 Filed 10-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55970-55971]
[FR Doc No: 2019-22767]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-3030]

Site Visit Training Program for Office of Pharmaceutical Quality
Staff; Information Available to Industry

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (CDER) is announcing an invitation for
participation in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 CDER Office of
Pharmaceutical Quality (OPQ) Staff Experiential Learning Site Visit
Program. The purpose of this document is to invite pharmaceutical
companies interested in participating in this program to submit a site
visit proposal to CDER's OPQ.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written proposals for participation
in this program by November 18, 2019. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
information on what to include in such proposals.

ADDRESSES: If your facility is interested in offering a site visit,
submit either an electronic proposal to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or a written proposal to Janet Wilson, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
75, Rm. 4642, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet Wilson, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 75, Rm. 4642, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-3969, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    A critical part of the commitment by CDER to make safe and
effective high-quality drugs available to the American public is
gaining an understanding of all aspects of a drug's development and
commercial life cycle, including the variety of drug manufacturing
operations. To support this commitment, CDER has initiated various
training and development programs including the FY2020 Experiential
Learning Site Visit program. This site visit program is designed to
offer experiential and firsthand learning opportunities that will
provide OPQ staff with a better understanding of the pharmaceutical
industry and its operations, as well as the challenges that impact a
drug's developmental program and commercial life cycle. The goal of
these visits is to enhance OPQ staff exposure to the drug development
and manufacturing processes in industry; therefore, a tour of
pharmaceutical company facilities, including manufacturing and
laboratory operations, is an integral part of the experience.

II. The Site Visit Program

    In this site visit program, groups on average of 15 to 20 OPQ staff
who have experience in a variety of backgrounds, including science,
medicine, statistics, manufacturing, engineering, testing, and project
management will observe operations of commercial manufacturing, pilot
plants (if applicable), and testing over a 1- to 2-day period. To
facilitate the learning process for OPQ staff, overview presentations
by industry related to drug development, manufacturing, and testing may
be included.
    OPQ encourages companies engaging in the development and
manufacturing of both active pharmaceutical ingredients (small and
large molecules) and drug products to respond. Please note that this
site visit program is not intended to supplement or replace a
regulatory inspection, e.g., a preapproval inspection, pre-license
inspection, or a surveillance inspection.
    The OPQ staff participating in this program will benefit by gaining
a better understanding of current industry practices, processes, and
procedures. Participating sites will have an opportunity to showcase
their technologies and actual manufacturing and testing facilities.
    Although observation of all aspects of drug development and
production would be beneficial to OPQ staff, OPQ has identified a
number of areas of particular interest to its staff. The following list
identifies some examples of these areas but is not intended to be
exhaustive, mutually exclusive, or to limit industry response:

 Drug products
    [cir] Solutions, suspensions, emulsions, and semisolids
    [cir] Modified- and immediate-release formulations
    [cir] Drug-device combination products (e.g., inhalation products,
transdermal systems, implants intended for drug delivery, and pre-
filled syringes)
 Active pharmaceutical ingredients
    [cir] Made entirely by chemical synthesis
    [cir] Derived from a biological source (e.g., fermentation,
mammalian cell culture)
 Design, development, manufacturing, and controls
    [cir] Engineering controls for aseptic processes
    [cir] Novel delivery technologies
    [cir] Hot melt extrusion
    [cir] Soft-gel encapsulation
    [cir] Lyophilization
    [cir] Blow-Fill-Seal and isolators
    [cir] Spray-drying
    [cir] Process analytical technology, measurement systems, and real-
time release testing
 Emerging technologies
    [cir] Continuous manufacturing
    [cir] 3-dimensional printing
    [cir] Nanotechnology

III. Site Selection

    Selection of potential facilities will be based on the priorities
developed for OPQ staff training, the facility's current compliance
status with FDA, and in consultation with the appropriate FDA district
office. All travel expenses associated with this program will be the
responsibility of OPQ; therefore, selection will be based on the
availability of funds and resources for the fiscal year. OPQ will not
provide financial compensation to the pharmaceutical site as part of
this program.

IV. Proposals for Participation

    Companies interested in offering a site visit or learning more
about this site visit program should respond by submitting a proposal
directly to Janet Wilson (see ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT). To aid in OPQ's site selection and planning, your proposal
should include the following information:

 A contact person
 The site visit location or locations
 A Facility Establishment Identifier (FEI) and any applicable
Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers
 The maximum number of FDA staff that can be accommodated
during a site visit (maximum of 20)
 A proposed agenda outlining the learning objectives and
associated activities for the site visit
 The maximum number of site visits (no more than two) that your
site would be willing to host by the close of the government fiscal
year (September 30, 2020)
 The proposed dates for each site visit

    Please note that the requested proposed agenda will be reviewed to
determine the educational benefit to OPQ in conducting the visit, and
selected sites may be asked to refine the

agenda to maximize the educational benefit. After a site is selected,
OPQ will communicate with the contact person for the site to determine
the actual dates for the visit. Proposals submitted without this
minimum information will not be considered. Based on response rate and
type of responses, OPQ may or may not consider alternative pathways to
meeting our training goals.

    Dated: October 11, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-22767 Filed 10-17-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


the engineer candidate and on the candidate to contact the State
with the relevant information. FRA requires the certification
candidate to write to the State licensing agency and request that
the agency inform the railroad concerning the person's driving
record. If required by the State agency, the person may have to pay
a nominal fee for providing such data and may have to furnish
written evidence that the prospective operator consents to the
release of the data to the railroad. FRA does not require that a
railroad or a certification candidate go beyond these efforts to
obtain the information in the control of such a State agency, and a
railroad may act upon the pending certification without the data if
an individual State agency fails or refuses to supply the records.
    If the non-issuing State licensing agency does provide the
railroad with the available records, the railroad must verify that
the record pertains to the person being considered for
certification. It is necessary to perform this verification because
in some instances only limited identification information is
furnished for use in the NDR and this might result in data about a
different person being supplied to the railroad. Among the available
means for verifying that the additional State record pertains to the
certification candidate are physical description, photographs, and
handwriting comparisons.
    Once the railroad has obtained the motor vehicle driving
record(s) which, depending on the circumstance, may consist of more
than two documents, the railroad must afford the prospective
engineer an opportunity to review that record and respond in writing
to its contents in accordance with the provisions of Sec.  240.219.
The review opportunity must occur before the railroad evaluates that
record. The railroad's required evaluation and subsequent decision
making must be done in compliance with the provisions of this part.

0
48. Revise appendix D to part 240 to read as follows:

Appendix D to Part 240--Identification of State Agencies That Perform
National Driver Register Checks

    Under the provisions of Sec.  240.111, each person seeking
certification or recertification as a locomotive operator must
request that a check of the National Driver Register (NDR) be
conducted and that the resulting information be furnished to his or
her employer or prospective employer. Under the provisions of
paragraphs (d) and (e) of Sec.  240.111, each person seeking
certification or recertification as a locomotive engineer must
request that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) conduct the NDR check, unless he or she was issued a motor
vehicle driver license by one of the State agencies that perform
such checks, which today includes all State agencies and the
District of Columbia. If the certification candidate received a
license from one of the State agencies or the District of Columbia,
he or she must request the State agency to perform the NDR check.
Since these State agencies can more efficiently supply the desired
data and, in some instances, can provide a higher quality of
information, FRA requires that certification candidates make use of
this method in preference to contacting NHTSA directly.

0
49. Add appendix G to part 240 to read as follows:

Appendix G to Part 240--Application of Revocable Events
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR15DE20.007

PART 242--QUALIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION OF CONDUCTORS

0
50. The authority citation for part 242 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 20103, 20107, 20135, 20138, 20162, 20163,
21301, 21304, 21311; 28 U.S.C. 2461, note; and 49 CFR 1.89.

0
51. Section 242.7 is amended by revising the definitions of ``Main
track'' and ``Substance abuse disorder'' to read as follows:

Sec.  242.7   Definitions.

* * * * *
    Main track means a track upon which the operation of trains is
governed by one or more of the following methods of operation:
Timetable; mandatory directive; signal indication; or any form of
absolute or manual block system.
* * * * *
    Substance abuse disorder refers to a psychological or physical
dependence on alcohol or a drug, or another identifiable and treatable
mental or physical disorder involving the abuse of alcohol or drugs as
a primary manifestation. A substance abuse disorder is ``active''
within the meaning of this part if the person is currently using
alcohol or other drugs, except under medical supervision consistent
with the restrictions described in Sec.  219.103 of this chapter or has
failed to complete primary treatment successfully or participate in
aftercare successfully as directed by a DAC or SAP.
* * * * *

0
52. Section 242.103 is amended by revising paragraphs (b), (c)(1) and
(2), and (d)(2) and (3) to read as follows:

Sec.  242.103   Approval of design of individual railroad programs by
FRA.

* * * * *
    (b) A railroad commencing operations after the pertinent date
specified in paragraph (a) of this section shall submit its written
certification program and request for approval in accordance with the
procedures contained in appendix B to this part at least 60 days prior
to commencing operations. The primary method for a railroad's
submission is by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For those railroads
that are unable to send the program by email, the program may be sent
to the Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety/Chief Safety
Officer, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
    (c) * * *
    (1) Simultaneous with its filing with FRA, provide a copy of the
submission filed pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, a
resubmission filed pursuant to paragraph (h) of this section, or a
material modification filed pursuant to paragraph (i) of this section
to the president of each labor organization that represents the
railroad's employees subject to this part; and
    (2) Include in its submission filed pursuant to paragraph (a) or
(b) of this section, a resubmission filed pursuant to paragraph (h) of
this section, or a material modification filed pursuant to paragraph
(i) of this section a statement affirming that the railroad has
provided a copy to the president of each labor organization that
represents the railroad's employees subject to this part, together with
a list of the names and addresses of persons provided a copy.
    (d) * * *
    (2) Each comment shall be submitted by email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to the Associate Administrator for
Railroad Safety/Chief Safety Officer, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590; and
    (3) The commenter shall affirm that a copy of the comment was
provided to the railroad.
* * * * *

0
53. Section 242.117 is amended by revising and republishing paragraphs
(g), (h), and (i) to read as follows:

Sec.  242.117   Vision and hearing acuity.

* * * * *
    (g) In order to be currently certified as a conductor, except as
permitted by paragraph (j) of this section, a person's vision and
hearing shall meet or exceed the standards prescribed in this section
and appendix D to this part. It is recommended that each test conducted
pursuant to this section should be performed according to any
directions supplied by the manufacturer of such test and any American
National Standards Institute (ANSI) standards that are applicable.
    (h) Except as provided in paragraph (j) of this section, each
person shall have visual acuity that meets or exceeds the following
thresholds:
    (1) For distant viewing, either:
    (i) Distant visual acuity of at least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye
without corrective lenses; or
    (ii) Distant visual acuity separately corrected to at least 20/40
(Snellen) with corrective lenses and distant binocular acuity of at
least 20/40 (Snellen) in both eyes with or without corrective lenses;
    (2) A field of vision of at least 70 degrees in the horizontal
meridian in each eye; and
    (3) The ability to recognize and distinguish between the colors of
railroad signals as demonstrated by successfully completing one of the
tests in appendix D to this part.
    (i) Except as provided in paragraph (j) of this section, each
person shall have a hearing test or audiogram that shows the person's
hearing acuity meets or exceeds the following thresholds: The person
does not have an average hearing loss in the better ear greater than 40
decibels with or without use of a hearing aid, at 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, and
2,000 Hz. The hearing test or audiogram shall meet the requirements of
one of the following:
    (1) As required in 29 CFR 1910.95(h) (Occupational Safety and
Health Administration);
    (2) As required in Sec.  227.111 of this chapter; or
    (3) Conducted using an audiometer that meets the specifications of
and is maintained and used in accordance with a formal industry
standard, such as ANSI S3.6, ``Specifications for Audiometers.''
* * * * *

0
54. Section 242.213 is amended by revising and republishing paragraph
(e) to read as follows:

Sec.  242.213   Multiple certifications.

* * * * *
    (e) If the conductor is removed from a passenger train for a
medical, police or other such emergency after the train departs from an
initial terminal, the train may proceed to the first location where the
conductor can be replaced without incurring undue delay without the
locomotive engineer being a certified conductor. However, an assistant
conductor or brakeman must be on the train and the locomotive engineer
must be informed that there is no certified conductor on the train
prior to any movement.
* * * * *

0
55. Section 242.403 is amended by revising and republishing paragraph
(d) to read as follows:

Sec.  242.403   Criteria for revoking certification.

* * * * *
    (d) In determining whether a person may be or remain certified as a
conductor, a railroad shall consider as operating rule compliance data
only conduct described in paragraphs (e)(1) through (11) of this
section that occurred within a period of 36 consecutive months prior to
the determination. A review of an existing certification shall be
initiated promptly upon the occurrence and documentation of any conduct
described in this section.
* * * * *

0
56. Section 242.503 is amended by revising and republishing paragraph
(c) to read as follows:

Sec.  242.503   Petition requirements.

* * * * *
    (c) A petition seeking review of a railroad's decision to deny
certification or recertification or revoke certification in accordance
with the procedures required by Sec.  242.407 filed with FRA more than
120 days after the date the railroad's denial or revocation decision
was served on the petitioner will be denied as untimely except that the
Operating Crew Review Board for cause shown may extend the petition
filing period at any time in its discretion:
    (1) Provided that the request for extension is filed before the
expiration of the period provided in this paragraph (c); or
    (2) Provided that the failure to file timely was the result of
excusable neglect.
* * * * *

0
57. Section 242.505 is amended by revising paragraphs (h), (i)
introductory text, (j), and (k) to read as follows:

Sec.  242.505   Processing certification review petitions.

* * * * *
    (h) When considering factual issues, the Board will determine
whether there is substantial evidence to support the railroad's
decision, and a negative finding is grounds for granting the petition.
    (i) When considering procedural issues, the Board will determine
whether the petitioner suffered substantial harm that was caused by the
failure to adhere to the dictated procedures for making the railroad's
decision. A finding of substantial harm is grounds for reversing the
railroad's decision. To establish grounds upon which the Board may
grant relief, Petitioner must show:
* * * * *
    (j) Pursuant to its reviewing role, the Board will consider whether
the railroad's legal interpretations are correct based on a de novo
review.
    (k) The Board will determine whether the denial or revocation of
certification or recertification was improper under this part (i.e.,
based on an incorrect determination that the person failed to meet the
certification requirements of this part) and grant or deny the petition
accordingly. The Board will not otherwise consider the propriety of a
railroad's decision, i.e., it will not consider whether the railroad
properly applied its own more stringent requirements.
* * * * *

0
58. Section 242.511 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (f) to
read as follows:

Sec.  242.511   Appeals.

    (a) Any party aggrieved by the presiding officer's decision may
file an appeal in the presiding officer's docket. The appeal must be
filed within 35 days of issuance of the decision. A copy of the appeal
shall be served on each party. The appeal shall set forth objections to
the presiding officer's decision, supported by reference to applicable
laws and regulations and with specific reference to the record. If no
appeal is timely filed, the presiding officer's decision constitutes
final agency action.
* * * * *
    (f) An appeal from an Operating Crew Review Board decision pursuant
to Sec.  242.503(d) must be filed in the Board's docket within 35 days
of issuance of the decision. A copy of the appeal shall be served on
each party. The Administrator may affirm or vacate the Board's
decision, and may remand the petition to the Board for further
proceedings. An Administrator's decision to affirm the Board's decision
constitutes final agency action.

0
59. Revise appendix E to part 242 to read as follows:

Appendix E to Part 242--Application of Revocable Events
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR15DE20.008

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Quintin C. Kendall,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020-27209 Filed 12-14-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:A 75 day period time to review the proposed regulations is insufficient. We are requesting the review period be extended to 180 days.


[Federal Register: December 14, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 239)]
[Notices]
[Page 73993-73994]
[DOCID:fr14de05-43]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR06-6-000]

Dow Pipeline Company; Notice of Petition for Rate Approval

December 8, 2005.
    Take notice that on November 30, 2005, Dow Pipeline Company (Dow
Pipeline) filed a petition for rate approval pursuant to section
284.123(b)(2) of the Commission's regulations. Dow Pipeline states that
it proposes a new system-wide maximum interruptible transportation rate
of $0.0349 per Dth, plus a 0.4 percent in-kind fuel reimbursement.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and

214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211
and 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to
intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be
filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing an
intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time December 30, 2005.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-7312 Filed 12-13-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P