[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 54 (Wednesday, March 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14714-14715]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05662]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0563; FRL-9959-73-OAR]

Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request;
National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Consumer
Products (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to
submit an information collection request (ICR), ``National Volatile
Organic Compound Emission Standards for Consumer Products (40 CFR part
59, subpart C) (Renewal), OMB Control No. 2060-0348, EPA ICR No.
1764.07,'' to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). Before
doing so, the EPA is soliciting public comments on specific aspects of
the proposed information collection as described below. This is a
proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through June
30, 2017. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before May 22, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2007-0563 online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by
email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Tina Ndoh, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Sector
Policies and Programs Division, Minerals and Manufacturing Group (D243-
04), Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina 27711; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number: 919-541-
5450; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA WJC West
Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The
telephone number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about the EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. The
EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval. At that time, the EPA will issue another Federal
Register notice to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB.
    Abstract: The information collection includes initial reports and
periodic recordkeeping necessary for the EPA to ensure compliance with
Federal standards for volatile organic compounds in consumer products.
Respondents are manufacturers, distributors, and importers of consumer
products. All information submitted to the EPA for which a claim of
confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency
policies set forth in 40 CFR part 2, subpart B, Confidentiality of
Business Information.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Manufacturers, distributors, and
importers of consumer products.
    Respondent's Obligation To Respond: Responses to the collection are
mandatory under 40 CFR part 59, subpart C, National Volatile Organic
Compound Emission Standards for Consumer Products.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 300 (total).
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Total Estimated Burden: 16,126 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total Estimated Cost: $1,765,427 (per year), includes $0 annualized
capital or operation and maintenance costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is a decrease of 13,487 hours in the
total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently
approved by OMB. This decrease is due to adjustments to the estimated
hours for each level of review. These adjustments are consistent with
the assumptions used routinely in ICR renewals, and are discussed in
the supporting statements for this action.

    Dated: February 24, 2017.
Peter Tsirigotis,
Director, Sector Policies and Programs Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-05662 Filed 3-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: March 14, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 49)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 11812-11817]
[DOCID:fr14mr07-12]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[Docket No. EPA-R02-OAR-2006-0162; FRL-8287-4]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Implementation
Plan Revision; State of New Jersey

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to approve
a request from the State of New Jersey to revise its State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for ozone to incorporate state-adopted
amendments to Subchapter 19 ``Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution
from Oxides of Nitrogen'' and related amendments to Subchapter 16
``Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution by Volatile Organic
Compounds.'' The amendments relate to the control of oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) emissions from stationary industrial sources. This SIP
revision consists of control measures needed to meet the shortfall in
emission reductions in New Jersey's 1-hour ozone attainment
demonstration SIP as identified by EPA.
    The intended effect of this proposed rule is to approve the state
control strategy, which will result in emission reductions that will
help achieve attainment of the national ambient air quality standards
for ozone required by the Clean Air Act (the Act).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 13, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R02-
OAR-2006-0162, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for

submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Raymond Werner, Chief, Air Programs Branch, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866.
     Hand Delivery: Raymond Werner, Chief, Air Programs Branch,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway,
25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866. Hand deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation. The
Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R02-OAR-
2006-0162. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,

unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail.

The http://www.regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system,

which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov,

your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony (Ted) Gardella
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>at the Air Programs Branch, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
New York 10007-1866, telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax number (212)
637-3901.
    Copies of the New Jersey submittals are available at the following
addresses for inspection during normal business hours:
    Air Programs Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2
Office, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866.
    New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Office of
Energy, Bureau of Air Quality Planning, 401 East State Street, CN027,
Trenton, New Jersey 08625.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For detailed information on New Jersey's SIP
revisions see the Technical Support Document (TSD), prepared in support
of today's proposed action. A copy of the TSD is available upon request
from the EPA Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES section or it can
be viewed at http://www.regulations.gov.

    The following table of contents describes the format for this
notice:

I. EPA's Proposed Action
    A. What Action Is EPA Proposing Today?
    B. Why Is EPA Proposing This Action?
    C. What Are the Clean Air Act Requirements for NOX
RACT?
    D. What Were the Clean Air Act Requirements for Attainment of
the 1-Hour Ozone Standard?
    E. When Was New Jersey's Additional NOX RACT
Requirement Proposed and Adopted?
    F. What Is EPA's Evaluation of New Jersey's Submittal?
II. Conclusion
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. EPA's Proposed Action

A. What Action Is EPA Proposing Today?

    EPA proposes to act on a New Jersey submission that includes a new
rule and amendments to Subchapter 19 ``Control and Prohibition of Air
Pollution from Oxides of Nitrogen''; Subchapter 16 ``Control and
Prohibition of Air Pollution by Volatile Organic Compounds'';
Subchapter 8 ``Permits and Certificates for Minor Facilities (and Major
Facilities Without an Operating Permit)''; and Subchapter 22
``Operating Permits.''
    Except for certain Open Market Emissions Trading (OMET) Program
provisions in Subchapters 8, 16, and 19,

and compliance dates beyond November 15, 2007 for repowering and
innovative control technology, as discussed later in this notice, EPA
proposes to approve, as revisions to the New Jersey ozone SIP, the
state-adopted amendments to Subchapter 19 and Subchapter 16, each
adopted by New Jersey on September 8, 2005, and submitted to EPA on
December 16, 2005. EPA is currently reviewing past amendments to
Subchapter 8 and will address the approvability of all Subchapter 8
amendments at the same time in a future action. Subchapter 22 is New
Jersey's operating permit rule that was separately approved under title
V of the Clean Air Act and therefore Subchapter 22 should not have been
submitted as a SIP revision. EPA has reviewed the new amendments to
Subchapter 22 and will formally respond to New Jersey with a letter.
    New Jersey amended Subchapter 19 to reduce additional emissions of
NOX in response to emission reduction shortfalls, identified
by EPA (64 FR 70380, December 16, 1999), for attainment of New Jersey's
1-hour ozone standard. New Jersey amended Subchapter 16 to be
consistent with amendments to Subchapter 19. Except for certain
provisions discussed later in this notice, EPA proposes that New
Jersey's state-adopted Subchapters 16 and 19 are fully approvable as a
SIP-strengthening measure for New Jersey's ground level ozone SIP. The
amendments to Subchapters 16 and 19 in New Jersey's submittal meet New
Jersey's commitment by adopting control measures for additional
emission reductions to attain the 1-hour ozone standard and close the
shortfall. Therefore, EPA will not proceed with the May 27, 2004 (69 FR
30249) proposed Finding of Failure to Implement.

B. Why Is EPA Proposing This Action?

    EPA is proposing this action to:
     Give the public the opportunity to submit comments on
EPA's proposed action;
     Approve a control measure which reduces NOX
emissions, a precursor of ozone formation, to help attain the national
ambient air quality standards for ozone;
     Fulfill New Jersey's and EPA's requirement under the Act;
and
     Make New Jersey's regulations for additional emission
reductions federally enforceable and available for emission reduction
credit in the SIP.

C. What Are the Clean Air Act Requirements for NOX RACT?

    The Act requires certain states to develop reasonably available
control technology (RACT) regulations for major stationary sources of
NOX and to provide for their implementation as soon as
practicable but, under the 1-hour ozone standard, no later than May 31,
1995. New Jersey amended Subchapter 19, the State's NOX RACT
regulation, to achieve the needed additional NOX reductions.
Under the Act, the definition of major stationary source is based on
the tons per year (tpy) of air pollution a source emits and the quality
of the air in the area in which the source is located. In ozone
transport regions, defined as attainment/unclassified areas as well as
marginal and moderate ozone nonattainment areas, if a major stationary
source of NOX emits or has the potential to emit 100 tpy or
more of NOX, it is subject to the requirements of a moderate
nonattainment area. New Jersey is within the Northeast ozone transport
region, established by section 184(a) of the Act. In New Jersey,
pursuant to Sec.  19.1 of Subchapter 19, a major stationary source for
NOX emits or has the potential to emit 25 tpy, the level set
for severe ozone nonattainment areas. Consequently, under the 1-hour
ozone standard, all sources of NOX that emit or have the
potential to emit 25 tpy within New Jersey were required to implement
RACT no later than May 31, 1995.
    In July 1997, EPA promulgated a revised national ambient air
quality standard for ozone of 0.08 parts per million (ppm). The
standard was based on a three-year average of the annual fourth-highest
daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations measured at each
monitor within an area. On April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23857), EPA
established air quality designations and classifications for every area
in the United States, including New Jersey, for the 8-hour ozone
standard. In the April 2004 rule, EPA designated the entire state of
New Jersey as nonattainment and classified New Jersey as a Subpart 2/
moderate area, effective June 15, 2004. The April 2004 rule also
provided that one year from the effective date of an area's 8-hour
ozone standard designation, the 1-hour ozone standard would no longer
apply (i.e., would be revoked) for that area. In December 2006, the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
vacated the April 2004 rule. S. Coast Air Quality Management Dist. v.
EPA, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31451. The case is still in litigation, thus
its resolution is unclear. Nonetheless, on February 4, 2002 (67 FR
5152), EPA approved New Jersey's commitment to adopt NOX
emission reductions by November 15, 2007 in order to close emissions
shortfalls and attain the 1-hour ozone standard.

D. What Were the Clean Air Act Requirements for Attainment of the 1-
Hour Ozone Standard?

    Section 182 of the Act requires states to submit SIP revisions for
areas classified as nonattainment for ozone and provides dates when the
revisions are to be submitted to EPA by the states. The specific
requirements vary depending upon the severity of the ozone problem. EPA
classified the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island area and the
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton area severe nonattainment areas (NAA)
under the 1-hour ozone standard. Under section 182 of the Act, severe
ozone nonattainment areas were required to submit demonstrations of how
they would attain the 1-hour ozone standard. As noted above, on
February 4, 2002 (67 FR 5152), EPA approved New Jersey's 1-hour ozone
attainment demonstration, which included New Jersey's commitment to
adopt additional volatile organic compound (VOC) and NOX
emission reductions to close the emissions shortfall.
    This proposal addresses the NOX reductions to which New
Jersey committed. For the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island NAA,
the deadline for attainment of the 1-hour ozone standard is November
15, 2007. According to ambient air quality data collected since 2005,
the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton NAA is in attainment for the 1-hour
ozone standard. Although ambient air quality monitors demonstrate
attainment for the 1-hour ozone standard, the Philadelphia-Wilmington-
Trenton NAA has never been reclassified to attainment. As stated above,
EPA has promulgated the 8-hour ozone standard, which, dependant upon
the litigation mentioned above, may supersede the 1-hour ozone standard
from the effective date of the 8-hour ozone designation. If the 1-hour
ozone standard is considered to be revoked, the New York-Northern New
Jersey-Long Island NAA is no longer required to attain the 1-hour ozone
standard by November 15, 2007. In any event, New Jersey is still
required to meet its commitment to reduce additional NOX
emissions to close the emissions shortfall by November 15, 2007. The
emission reductions provided by control measures in the amendments to
Subchapter 19 will also be necessary

for attainment of the 8-hour ozone standard.
    The Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) developed model rules for
potential control measures for achieving NOX reductions for
a number of source categories and estimated the potential emission
reduction benefits from implementing the model rules. The model rules
were designed for use by states in developing their own regulations to
close emission shortfalls. New Jersey used the OTC model rules for
NOX reductions as the basis for the submission upon which
EPA is now acting.

E. When Was New Jersey's NOX RACT Requirement Proposed and
Adopted?

    New Jersey proposed NOX RACT rules and related
requirements on September 20, 2004, accepted written comments on them
until November 19, 2004, and held public hearings on them on October
28, 2004. New Jersey adopted the amended NOX RACT and
related requirements on September 8, 2005, and submitted them to EPA
for approval as revisions to the SIP on December 16, 2005. On January
25, 2006, EPA determined the submittal to be administratively and
technically complete.

F. What Is EPA's Evaluation of New Jersey's Submittal?

    New Jersey previously submitted SIP revisions to Subchapter 19 to
address the NOX RACT requirements, which EPA approved as SIP
revisions on January 27, 1997 (62 FR 3806) and March 29, 1999 (64 FR
14832). New Jersey also developed a NOX Budget Trading
Program (Subchapter 31), which EPA approved on May 22, 2001 (66 FR
28063). The current submission provides amendments that establish more
stringent RACT limits for facilities that emit NOX. The
following is a summary of EPA's evaluation of New Jersey's December 16,
2005 SIP submittal consisting of amendments to Subchapters 16 and 19.
1. Subchapter 19
    New Jersey revised Subchapter 19 to require owners and operators to
implement the following new requirements:
    Stationary reciprocating engines. The amended Subchapter 19, which
has a compliance date of March 7, 2007, lowers the presumptive
NOX emission limits and lowers the applicability threshold
for existing stationary reciprocating engines (REs) used for generating
electricity. These amendments apply regardless of whether the source is
located at a facility classified as major for NOX. The
previous rule that was approved into the SIP applied to any engine
source category capable of producing an output of more than 500 brake
horsepower (bhp) (370 kilowatts (kW)). The new NOX emission
limits apply to the following: (1) An engine that has a rated power
output of 148 kW (about 200 bhp) or greater; and (2) a group of two or
more engines each of which has a rated power output of 37 kW (about 50
bhp) or greater, but less than 148 kW, and whose total combined power
output is 148 kW or greater; and (3) an engine capable of producing an
output of 370 kW (500 bhp) or greater.
    The new NOX emission limits for these three categories
of engines, expressed as grams NOX per bhp-hour (g/bhp-hr),
range from 1.5 to 2.3 depending upon the type of engine and the fuel
combusted, and will result in additional NOX reductions
ranging from zero percent to 71 percent. The rule provides that lean-
burn engines that combust gaseous fuels must meet either a
NOX emission limit of 1.5 g/bhp-hr or an emission limit
equivalent to an 80 percent reduction from the uncontrolled
NOX emission level. The rule also includes NOX
emission limits for the following two new source categories: (1) Rich-
burn engines that combust liquid fuel and (2) lean-burn engines capable
of combusting dual (gas and liquid) fuels.
    New Jersey also amended Subchapter 19 to apply to engines with a
maximum rated power output of 37 kW or greater that are new or modified
on or after March 7, 2007. New engines must meet a NOX
emission limit of 0.90 g/bhp-hr; modified engines are to meet the same
NOX emission limit as new engines or an emission limit that
is equivalent to a 90 percent NOX reduction from the
uncontrolled emission level.
    Pursuant to Sec.  19.3(f) of Subchapter 19, owners or operators of
the category of engines mentioned above may comply by meeting the new
presumptive NOX emission limits or by one of the following
existing options: (1) An emissions averaging plan pursuant to
Sec. Sec.  19.6 and 19.14; (2) an alternative maximum allowable
emission limit pursuant to Sec.  19.13; (3) a plan for phased
compliance through the use of repowering pursuant to Sec.  19.21; or
(4) a plan for phased compliance through the use of innovative control
technology pursuant to Sec.  19.23. In accordance with the phased
compliance plan option, owners or operators planning to comply with a
phased compliance plan must fully implement the plan by November 7,
2009 and have begun to comply with interim control measures and other
requirements by March 7, 2007. Pursuant to Sec.  19.20 of Subchapter
19, New Jersey must approve of any phased compliance plan. Applications
to implement the phased compliance plans were due to New Jersey by
February 7, 2006.
    Each of the compliance options listed above are addressed below.
First, any emissions averaging plan must be approved by New Jersey,
however EPA approval is not required since the emissions averaging
procedures of Subchapter 19.6 have already been approved by EPA into
the New Jersey SIP. Second, any alternative maximum allowable emission
limit must be approved by New Jersey and submitted for EPA approval as
a SIP revision as provided in Sec.  19.13.
    Finally, the phased compliance plan options in Sec. Sec.  19.21 and
19.23 would allow sources to comply with the NOX RACT
requirements in 2009 which is beyond the November 15, 2007 attainment
deadline for the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island NAA. Sources
that implement these phased compliance plan options in 2009 would not
help the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island NAA achieve the
NOX reductions needed for attainment of the 1-hour ozone
standard by the November 15, 2007 attainment date. For this reason, the
new amended 2009 compliance date for phased compliance plan options is
not acceptable to EPA. If the amendments to the phased compliance plan
options had a compliance date prior to the start of the 2007 ozone
season this would be acceptable to EPA.
    It should be noted that New Jersey received no applications for
phased compliance plan options before New Jersey's application deadline
of February 7, 2006. Therefore, the new amendments to the phased
compliance plan options at Sec. Sec.  19.21 and 19.23 have no practical
effect. Accordingly, EPA is not proposing to approve or disapprove
these sections into the SIP. For the reasons stated above, EPA further
recommends that New Jersey delete the new amendments to Sec. Sec.
19.21 and 19.23 from Subchapter 19. These comments also apply to new
amendments to Subchapter 19 that established phased compliance plan
options for owners or operators of stationary combustion turbines and
owners or operators of industrial/commercial/institutional boilers and
other indirect heat exchangers.
    Pursuant to Sec.  19.8(f), effective either in 2005 or 2007,
depending on the engine size, owners and operators of engines used for
generating electricity, whether or not the engine is located at a major
NOX facility or, having a

maximum rated output of at least 37 kW or greater, shall adjust the
engine's combustion process in accordance with the procedures specified
in Subchapter 19. While combustion process adjustment is expected to
reduce emissions of NOX, New Jersey has indicated that it is
not depending upon these reductions to meet the emissions shortfall.
    Stationary combustion turbines. New Jersey amended Subchapter 19 by
lowering the presumptive NOX emission limits and by lowering
the applicability threshold for existing stationary combustion
turbines. The amendments provide that, effective March 7, 2007, the
maximum gross heat input rate applicability threshold for stationary
combustion turbines is 25 MM BTU/hr instead of 30 MM BTU/hr, as was the
case in the previous State rule. Also, New Jersey changed the
NOX emission limits from heat input based limits (pounds per
MM BTU (Lb/MM BTU)) to production output based limits (pounds per
megawatt-hour (Lb/MWh)). Output based limits encourage sources to
improve plant operating efficiency and pollution prevention, such as
clean energy supply, which result in reduced fuel consumption and
reduce emissions of pollutants, including NOX. The new
NOX emission limits for stationary combustion turbines are
in Table 4 of Subchapter 19. For oil fired turbines, the new output
based NOX limits are more stringent, by about 25 percent,
than the previous input based NOX limits. For gas fired
turbines, the new NOX emission limits are as stringent as
the previous NOX emission limits. One exception is that
owners or operators of NOX budget sources, regulated under
Subchapter 31, shall continue to be subject to the current SIP-approved
NOX emission limits provided in Tables 2 and 3 of Subchapter
19.
    Pursuant to Sec.  19.5(d), owners or operators of stationary
combustion turbines, with a maximum gross heat input rate of at least
25 MM BTU/hr, have the option of complying with any one of the
following: (1) The new presumptive output based NOX emission
limits provided in Table 4 of Subchapter 19; (2) the alternative
compliance options, in Sec.  19.3(f) of Subchapter 19, as described
above, for stationary reciprocating engines; and (3) a SIP-approved
compliance option pursuant to Sec.  19.5(c) of Subchapter 19, which
requires the owner or operator to obtain New Jersey's approval of its
application demonstrating an insufficient supply of water to the
turbine suitable for NOX emission control and to establish
that no commercially available dry-low NOX combustor
suitable for use in the specific turbine. It should be noted that EPA
believes that the reference in Sec.  19.5(d) to ``(c)1 through 5
below'' is a typographical error. EPA believes that the reference
should read ``(c)1 through 5 above,'' and that New Jersey should
correct the error accordingly.
    New Jersey also amended Subchapter 19 to require an owner or
operator of a turbine, with a maximum gross heat input rate of at least
25 MM BTU/hr, to adjust the turbine's combustion process in accordance
with the procedures specified in Subchapter 19, starting in either 2005
or 2007, depending upon the turbine's heat input rate.
    Industrial/commercial/institutional boilers and other indirect heat
exchangers. New Jersey amended Subchapter 19 by lowering certain
presumptive NOX emission limits and by lowering the
applicability threshold for annual combustion process adjustments for
industrial/commercial/institutional (ICI) boilers and other indirect
heat exchangers (IHE). The amendments provide that, effective March 7,
2007, the NOX emission limits for natural gas fired ICI
boilers or other IHEs that have a maximum gross heat input rate of at
least 100 MM BTU/hr is lowered to 0.10 lb NOX/MM BTU from
0.20 lb NOX/MM BTU and 0.43 lb NOX/MM BTU. The
change represents a reduction in NOX emissions ranging from
50 percent to almost 77 percent, depending upon whether the firing
method type is tangential, face or cyclone. New Jersey did not revise
the NOX emission limits for other size or type ICI boilers
or other IHEs. The new NOX emission limits for ICI boilers
and other IHEs are in provided Table 7 of Subchapter 19.
    As with owners and operators of stationary combustion turbines and
stationary reciprocating engines, owners and operators of ICI boilers
and other IHEs have the option of complying with either the new
presumptive NOX emission limits or the alternative
compliance options, pursuant to Sec.  19.3(f) of Subchapter 19, as
described above for stationary reciprocating engines.
    New Jersey also amended Subchapter 19 by lowering the applicability
threshold of 20 MM BTU/hr heat input rate for sources required to
annually adjust their combustion process. The amendments provide that,
effective March 7, 2007, the applicability threshold for such sources
is 5 MM BTU/hr maximum gross heat input rate. This threshold applies
regardless of whether the source is located at a facility classified as
major for NOX. Effective in either 2007, 2008, or 2010,
depending upon the source's heat input rate, owners or operators of
such sources are required to adjust the combustion process in
accordance with the procedures specified in Subchapter 19.
    Emergency generators. New Jersey amended Subchapter 19 by adding a
new provision, Sec.  19.11, which requires owners and operators of
emergency generators with a maximum rated output of 37 kW, to maintain
detailed and specific records on site for five years whenever an
emergency generator has been in use. In addition, New Jersey amended
Sec.  19.2(d) by deleting the following two conditions for an emergency
generator exemption from Subchapter 19: (1) 500 hours operating
restriction over any consecutive twelve month period; and (2) potential
to emit (PTE) of less than 25 tpy NOX emissions during an
annual period of operation.
    EPA has determined that New Jersey's additional amendments to Sec.
19.2(d), and to the definition of emergency generators in Sec.  19.1,
clarify when emergency generators shall and shall not be used. These
amendments combined with the new recordkeeping provisions in Sec.
19.11 provide New Jersey and EPA with information for any enforcement
action, if needed.
    During the public comment period, a citizen commented that the
removal of the 500 hour emergency operation time limit made the PTE
analysis and netting analysis for a source ambiguous. EPA's September
1995 guidance entitled, ``Calculating Potential to Emit (PTE) for
Emergency Generators,'' establishes the criteria for determining a
source's PTE and recommends 500 hours as an appropriate default
assumption for estimating the number of hours an emergency generator
could be expected to operate under worst-case conditions. EPA's PTE
guidance for emergency generators also states that alternative
estimates can be made on a case-by-case basis where justified by the
source owner or permitting authority.
    New Jersey deleted the 500 hour operating restriction for emergency
generators from Subchapter 19 because it believed that ``hours of
operation'' is not an appropriate criteria for defining an emergency
generator. In a communication to EPA, New Jersey interpreted the EPA
proposed rule ``Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression
Ignition Internal Combustion Engines'' (70 FR 39869, July 11, 2005), as
further justification for deletion of the 500 hour restriction. In a
February 14, 2006 letter to New Jersey, EPA responded that New Jersey
misinterpreted EPA's July 2005 proposed rule and that ``for purposes of

the NSR and title V programs New Jersey should continue as they have
and permit emergency units at some amount of operation sufficiently
large to cover emergencies (i.e., 500 hours per year). Malfunctions
that may require the operation of the emergency units and that may
exceed the 500 hours/year limit could be handled through enforcement
discretion on a case-by-case basis, as appropriate.'' Therefore, PTE
requirements for emergency generators should be included in New
Jersey's operating permit regulations, i.e., Subchapters 8 and 22, and
should include the provisions that were deleted from the current SIP
approved Subchapter 19, i.e., (1) the 500 hour annual operational
restriction, or some other appropriate operating period in accordance
with EPA's September 1995 guidance, and (2) the exemption for sources
with a PTE of less than 25 tpy NOX.
    While EPA proposes to approve the new emergency generator
provisions, for rule consistency, EPA believes it appropriate, although
not required, that New Jersey revise the currently adopted Subchapter
19 to also include the emergency generator restrictions identified in
the current SIP-approved Subchapter 19. EPA would consider new language
within Subchapter 19 that would allow owners and operators to operate
emergency generators without restriction to operating hours for special
situations such as when the governor of New Jersey declared an
emergency because of an unprecedented and unexpectedly long blackout or
a force majeure event (like a severe hurricane).
    Open Market Emissions Trading (OMET) Program. In July 1996, New
Jersey adopted amendments to Subchapter 19 for consistency with the
state-adopted Subchapter 30, called the OMET Program. The OMET Program,
and amendments to Subchapter 19, permitted a source regulated under
Subchapter 19 to meet its NOX RACT emission requirements by
purchasing discrete emission reduction credits (DERs). The DERs were
generated by a source that reduced NOX emissions beyond its
regulatory requirements. EPA and New Jersey identified a number of
problems with the OMET Program. EPA withdrew its proposed conditional
approval of the OMET Program on October 18, 2002 and New Jersey
terminated Subchapter 30 on February 25, 2004. On April 5, 2004, New
Jersey amended Subchapter 19, withdrew the OMET provisions adopted in
July 1996, and replaced them with new provisions that included a
compliance schedule for the affected OMET sources. The latter OMET
compliance provisions are included in New Jersey's December 2005 SIP
revision to EPA.
    EPA objected to the new OMET compliance schedule, and related
compliance requirements for sources subject to NOX RACT
regulation. The new OMET compliance schedule would allow sources to
comply with the NOX RACT requirements of Subchapter 19
beyond the May 31, 1995 compliance date deadline mandated by the Act.
In a December 2005 SIP submittal letter, New Jersey committed to delete
OMET from Subchapter 19, and from Subchapters 8 and 16. Therefore, EPA
expects New Jersey, in future rulemaking, to delete the OMET-related
provisions in Subchapters 8, 16 and 19, i.e., Sec. Sec.  8.3(o),
8.20(b)(3), 16.1A(g), 16.1A(h), 19.3(g), 19.3(h), 19.27, and the 19.27
Appendix, and is not approving them into the SIP.
    Additional amendments to Subchapter 19. New Jersey adopted a number
of other amendments since EPA last approved amendments to Subchapter 19
(64 FR 14832, March 29, 1999). Among other things, these amendments:
(1) Revised terms and definitions that do not change the meaning or
stringency of the provisions; (2) revised the due date for permit
applications and submittals of NOX Control Plans, pursuant
to Sec.  19.13, to February 7, 2006; (3) revised Sec. Sec.  19.2 and
19.9 by deleting the applicability threshold of 25 tpy PTE
NOX for asphalt plants, which made the provisions more
stringent; (4) revised the ozone season closing date to September 30 to
conform with the closing date provided in Subchapter 31, the
NOX Budget Program; and (5) revised testing requirements to
conform with certain new control measures for stationary reciprocating
engines.
2. Subchapter 16
    The amendments to Subchapter 16 are administrative in nature and
ensure consistency with the amendments to Subchapter 19. The amendments
to Subchapter 16 include the following: (1) Revised terms and
definitions that do not change the meaning or stringency of the
provisions; (2) lowered applicability thresholds for the following
source categories that are required to implement annual combustion
adjustments: (a) Small boilers and IHEs, not used for generating
electricity; (b) stationary combustion turbines; and (c) stationary
reciprocating engines, if used to generate electricity; and (3) a
revised definition and recordkeeping requirements for emergency
generators.
3. Summary of EPA's Evaluation
    EPA expects that the revisions to Subchapter 19 will result in
additional reductions in NOX emissions to help New Jersey
meet the emissions reduction shortfall and attain the ozone standard.
EPA evaluated New Jersey's SIP submittal and proposes to find
Subchapters 16 and 19 approvable. However, as explained above, EPA
takes no action on and expects New Jersey to delete: (1) All OMET
provisions in Subchapters 8, 16 and 19; (2) the new amendments to
phased compliance plan through repowering in Sec.  19.21; and (3) the
new amendments to phased compliance plan through the use of innovative
control technology in Sec.  19.23. The December 16, 2005 SIP submittal
will strengthen New Jersey's SIP for reducing ground level ozone by
providing additional NOX reductions beginning on March 7,
2007.
    EPA completed a detailed analysis and evaluation to determine the
approvability of New Jersey's December 16, 2005 SIP revision. EPA's
evaluation of the SIP submittal is detailed in a document entitled
``Technical Support Document--NOX RACT SIP Revision--State
of New Jersey.'' A copy of that document is available, upon request,
from the EPA Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
document or the Technical Support Document can be viewed at http://www.regulations.gov
.

II. Conclusions

    EPA evaluated New Jersey's submittal for consistency with the Act,
EPA regulations and EPA policy. The proposed new control measures will
strengthen the SIP by providing additional NOX emission
reductions. Accordingly, EPA is proposing to approve the revisions to
Subchapter 19, and related revisions to Subchapter 16, as adopted on
September 8, 2005, except that EPA is not acting, at this time, on OMET
Program provisions in Subchapters 16 and 19 or the new amendments to
phased compliance plans by repowering and innovative control technology
in Sec. Sec.  19.21 and 19.23, respectively. EPA is not approving any
dates that allow for NOX RACT compliance beyond May 31,
1995, in general, and beyond May 1, 1999 for completion of repowering
for sources that should have complied by the date required in the March
29, 1999 EPA-approved SIP. In addition, at a later date, EPA will act
on Subchapter 8, as adopted by New Jersey on September 8, 2005.
    With the adoption of Subchapter 19, New Jersey has fulfilled its
obligation to

adopt all six control measures that New Jersey identified as necessary
to attain the 1-hour ozone standard. Therefore, EPA will not proceed
with the May 27, 2004 (69 FR 30249) proposed Finding of Failure to
Implement.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
proposed action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and
therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that
this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule proposes to approve pre-
existing requirements under state law and does not impose any
additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does
not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect
small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    This proposed rule also does not have tribal implications because
it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not
have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action
merely proposes to approve a state rule implementing a Federal
standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This
proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272) do not apply. This proposed rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: March 6, 2007.
Alan J. Steinberg,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
 [FR Doc. E7-4665 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: November 28, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 228)]
[Notices]
[Page 68814-68815]
[DOCID:fr28no06-47]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0745; FRL-8247-5]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Reformulated Gasoline Commingling
Provisions (Renewal); EPA ICR No. 2228.02, OMB Control No. 2060-0587

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)(44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below, describes the
nature of the information collection and its estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before December 28,
2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2006-0745, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket

Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket,
Environmental Protection Agency; 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB by mail to: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attention:
Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Geanetta Heard, Office of
Transportation and Air Quality, Transportation and Regional Programs
(6406J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12.
    On September 28, 2006 (71 FR 56969), EPA sought comments on this
proposed ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any
additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0745, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, and for in-person viewing at the Air and Radiation

Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA
West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/
DC Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>. The telephone number for the Air Docket
is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at
http://www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index

listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in
the docket that are available electronically. Once in the system,
select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified
above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or on paper, will be made available for public
viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA receives them and without change,

unless the comment contains copyrighted material, confidential business
information (CBI), or other information for which public disclosure is
restricted by statute. For further information about the electronic
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov.

    Title: Reformulated Gasoline Commingling Provisions (Renewal).
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 2228.02, OMB Control No. 2060-0587.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2006.
Under

OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the
collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: With this ICR, we are seeking permission to accept
notifications from gasoline retailers and wholesale purchaser-consumers
related to commingling of ethanol blended and non-ethanol-blended
reformulated gasoline (RFG) under section 1513 of the Energy Policy Act
of 2005 (EPAct) and 40 CFR 80.78(a)(8)(ii)(B); and to provide for a
compliance option whereby a retailer or wholesale purchaser-consumer
may demonstrate compliance via test results under 40 CFR
80.78(a)(8)(iii)(A). These provisions are designed to grant compliance
flexibility. An emergency ICR has been put in place and expires on
November 30, 2006. We are requesting that the OMB renew this ICR and
request that it be effective for three years after approval.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.25
hours (15 minutes) per response. Burden means the total time, effort,
or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain,
retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency.
This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by
this action are gasoline retailers, wholesale purchaser-consumers,
gasoline stations with convenience stores and gasoline stations without
convenience stores.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 56,700.
    Frequency of Response: Occasional.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 27,675.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $1,964,925, includes no capital or O&M
costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is no change in the total estimated
burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR
Burdens.

    Dated: November 16, 2006.
Oscar Morales,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E6-19878 Filed 11-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 6189]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02256]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4509-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

North Dakota; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of North Dakota (FEMA-4509-DR), dated April 1, 2020, and
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on January 7, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Nancy J.
Dragani, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating
Officer for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Tammy L. Littrell as
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-02256 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 212 (Friday, November 1, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58729-58732]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23883]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2019-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1971]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Federal
Regulations. The LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will be finalized on the dates
listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS report in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to

adopt or to show evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or
remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Chief executive officer of                                    Online location of letter of map                            Community
         State and county          Location and case No.             community               Community map repository                 revision                Date of modification       No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona:.........................
    Maricopa.....................  City of Surprise (19-  The Honorable Skip Hall,        Public Works Department,       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 24, 2020.........       040053
                                    09-0616P).             Mayor, City of Surprise,        Engineering Development        advanceSearch.
                                                           16000 North Civic Center        Services, 16000 North Civic
                                                           Plaza, Surprise, AZ 85374.      Center Plaza, Surprise, AZ
                                                                                85374.
    Maricopa.....................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Bill Gates,       Flood Control District of      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 24, 2020.........       040037
                                    of Maricopa County     Chairman, Board of              Maricopa County, 2801 West     advanceSearch.
                                    (19-09-0616P).         Supervisors, Maricopa County,   Durango Street, Phoenix, AZ
                                                           301 West Jefferson Street,      85009.
                                                           10th Floor, Phoenix, AZ
                                                           85003.
    Yavapai......................  City of Prescott (19-  The Honorable Greg Mengarelli,  Public Works Department, 433   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 6, 2020..........       040098
                                    09-1152P).             Mayor, City of Prescott, City   North Virginia Street,         advanceSearch.
                                                           Hall, 201 South Cortez          Prescott, AZ 86301.
                                                           Street, Prescott, AZ 86303.
    Yavapai......................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Randy Garrison,   Yavapai County Flood Control   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 6, 2020..........       040093
                                    of Yavapai County      Chairman, Board of              District, 1120 Commerce        advanceSearch.
                                    (19-09-1152P).         Supervisors, Yavapai County,    Drive, Prescott, AZ 86305.
                                                           10 South 6th Street,
                                                           Cottonwood, AZ 86326.
California:
    Lake.........................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Tina Scott,       Lake County, Department of     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 16, 2020.........       060090
                                    of Lake County (19-    Chair, Board of Supervisors,    Public Works, 255 North        advanceSearch.
                                    09-1004P).             Lake County, 255 North Forbes   Forbes Street, Room 309,
                                                           Street, Lakeport, CA 95453.     Lakeport, CA 95453.
    Placer.......................  City of Roseville (19- The Honorable John B. Allard    Engineering Department, 316    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 21, 2020.........       060243
                                    09-1696P).             II, Mayor, City of Roseville,   Vernon Street, Roseville, CA   advanceSearch.
                                                           311 Vernon Street, Roseville,   95678.
                                                           CA 95678.
    Riverside....................  Agua Caliente Band of  The Honorable Jeff L. Grubbe,   Tribal Administrative Office,  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 31, 2020.........       060763
                                    Cahuilla Indian        Chairman, Tribal Council,       Planning and Natural           advanceSearch.
                                    Reservation (19-09-    Agua Caliente Band of           Resources, 5401 Dinah Shore
                                    1172P).                Cahuilla Indians, 5401 Dinah    Drive, Palm Springs, CA
                                                           Shore Drive, Palm Springs, CA   92264.
                                                           92264.
    Riverside....................  City of Palm Springs   The Honorable Robert Moon,      Public Works and Engineering   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 31, 2020.........       060257
                                    (19-09-1172P).         Mayor, City of Palm Springs,    Department, 3200 East          advanceSearch.
                                                           3200 East Tahquitz Canyon       Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm
                                                           Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262.    Springs, CA 92262.
Idaho:
    Canyon.......................  City of Middleton (19- The Honorable Darin Taylor,     City Hall, 1103 West Main      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 17, 2020.........       160037
                                    10-0311P).             Mayor, City of Middleton,       Street, Middleton, ID 83644.   advanceSearch.
                                                           City Hall, 1103 West Main
                                                           Street, Middleton, ID 83644.

    Canyon.......................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Pam White,        Canyon County Administration   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 17, 2020.........       160208
                                    of Canyon County (19-  Chair, Board of County          Building, 111 North 11th       advanceSearch.
                                    10-0311P).             Commissioners, County           Avenue, Room 101, Caldwell,
                                                           Courthouse, 1115 Albany         ID 83605.
                                                           Street, Room 101, Caldwell,
                                                           ID 83605.
Illinois:
    DuPage.......................  City of Warrenville    The Honorable David L.          City Hall, 28W701 Stafford     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 9, 2020..........       170218
                                    (19-05-2162P).         Brummel, Mayor, City of         Place, Warrenville, IL         advanceSearch.
                                                           Warrenville, 28W701 Stafford    60555.
                                                           Place, Warrenville, IL 60555.
    DuPage.......................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Dan Cronin,       DuPage County Administration   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 9, 2020..........       170197
                                    of DuPage County (19-  Chairman, DuPage County         Building, Stormwater           advanceSearch.
                                    05-2162P).             Board, 421 North County Farm    Management, 421 North County
                                                           Road, Wheaton, IL 60187.        Farm Road, Wheaton, IL
                                                                                60187.
    Marshall.....................  City of Wenona (19-05- The Honorable Jamie Durham,     City Hall, 226 South Chestnut  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 9, 2020..........       170462
                                    3185P).                Mayor, City of Wenona, P.O.     Street, Wenona, IL 61377.      advanceSearch.
                                                           Box 601, Wenona, IL 61377.
    Marshall.....................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Gary R.           Marshall County Courthouse,    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 9, 2020..........       170994
                                    of Marshall County     Kroeschen, Chairman, Marshall   122 North Prairie Street,      advanceSearch.
                                    (19-05-3185P).         County Board, P.O. Box 328,     Lacon, IL 61540.
                                                           Lacon, IL 61540.
Indiana:
    Marion.......................  City of Indianapolis   The Honorable Joe Hogsett,      City Hall, 1200 Madison        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 24, 2020.........       180159
                                    (18-05-2012P)          Mayor, City of Indianapolis,    Avenue, Suite 100,             advanceSearch.
                                                           2501 City-County Building,      Indianapolis, IN 46225.
                                                           200 East Washington Street,
                                                           Indianapolis, IN 46204.
    Marion.......................  Town of Speedway (18-  Mr. Jacob Blasdel, Town         Town Hall, 1450 North          https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 24, 2020.........       180162
                                    05-2012P)              Manager, Town of Speedway,      Lynhurst Drive, Speedway, IN   advanceSearch.
                                                           1450 North Lynhurst Drive,      46224.
                                                           Speedway, IN 46224.
Iowa: Black Hawk.................  City of Waterloo (19-  The Honorable Quentin M. Hart,  City Hall, 715 Mulberry        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 28, 2020.........       190025
                                    07-1540P).             Mayor, City of Waterloo, 715    Street, Waterloo, IA 50703.    advanceSearch.
                                                           Mulberry Street, Waterloo, IA
                                                           50703.
Minnesota: Hennepin..............  City of Maple Grove    The Honorable Mark Steffenson,  Government Center, and Public  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 31, 2020.........       270169
                                    (18-05-4086P).         Mayor, City of Maple Grove,     Safety Facility, 12800 Arbor   advanceSearch.
                                                           Government Center, 12800        Lakes Parkway North, Maple
                                                           Arbor Lakes Parkway North,      Grove, MN 55369.
                                                           Maple Grove, MN 55369.
Missouri:
    St. Charles..................  City of St. Charles    The Honorable Dan Borgmeyer,    City Hall, 200 North 2nd       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 28, 2020.........       290318
                                    (19-07-1154P).         Mayor, City of St. Charles,     Street, St. Charles, MO        advanceSearch.
                                                           200 North 2nd Street, 4th       63301.
                                                           Floor, Room 400, St Charles,
                                                           MO 63301.
    Scott........................  City of Sikeston (18-  The Honorable Steven Burch,     City Hall, 105 East Center     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Feb. 6, 2020..........       295270
                                    07-2115P).             Mayor, City of Sikeston, 105    Street, Sikeston, MO 63801.    advanceSearch.
                                                           East Center Street, Sikeston,
                                                           MO 63801.
    Scott........................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Jim Glueck,       Scott County Courthouse, 131   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Feb. 6, 2020..........       290837
                                    of Scott County (18-   Presiding Scott County          South Winchester Street,       advanceSearch.
                                    07-2115P).             Commissioner, P.O. Box 188,     Benton, MO 63736.
                                                           Benton, MO 63736.
Nebraska: Lincoln................  City of North Platte   The Honorable Dwight            City Hall, 211 West 3rd        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Feb. 7, 2020..........       310143
                                    (19-07-0085P).         Livingston, Mayor, City of      Street, North Platte, NE       advanceSearch.
                                                           North Platte, 211 West 3rd      69101.
                                                           Street, North Platte, NE
                                                           69101.
Nevada: Clark....................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Marilyn           Clark County, Office of the    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 13, 2020.........       320003
                                    of Clark County (19-   Kirkpatrick, Chair, Board of    Director of Public Works,      advanceSearch.
                                    09-1976P).             Commissioners, Clark County,    500 South Grand Central
                                                           500 South Grand Central         Parkway, 2nd Floor, Las
                                                           Parkway, 6th Floor, Las         Vegas, NV 89155.
                                                           Vegas, NV 89106.

Ohio:
    Butler.......................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Donald L. Dixon,  Butler County Administrative   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 27, 2020.........       390037
                                    of Butler County (18-  President, Board of             Center, Building and Zoning    advanceSearch.
                                    05-6293P).             Commissioners, Butler County    Department, 130 High Street,
                                                           Government Services Center,     1st Floor, Hamilton, OH
                                                           315 High Street, 6th Floor,     45011.
                                                           Hamilton, OH 45011.
    Franklin.....................  City of Grove City     The Honorable Richard L.        City Hall, 4035 Broadway,      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 10, 2020.........       390173
                                    (18-05-3157P).         ``Ike'' Stage, Mayor, City of   Grove City, OH 43123.          advanceSearch.
                                                           Grove City, 4035 Broadway,
                                                           Grove City, OH 43123.
    Warren.......................  City of Mason (18-05-  The Honorable Victor Kidd,      Municipal Center, 6000 Mason   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jan. 27, 2020.........       390559
                                    6293P).                Mayor, City of Mason, Mason     Montgomery Road, Mason, OH     advanceSearch.
                                                           Municipal Center, 6000 Mason    45040.
                                                           Montgomery Road, Mason, OH
                                                           45040.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2019-23883 Filed 10-31-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


 [Federal Register: October 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 204)] [ Notices]                [Page 54862-54864] [DOCID:fr23oc09-87]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

  Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange

Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC

20549-0213.

Extension:

    Rule 31a-2; SEC File No. 270-174; OMB Control No. 3235-0179.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the Securities and Exchange

Commission (the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the

collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to

submit this existing collection of information to the Office of

Management and Budget for extension and approval.

    Section 31(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the

``Act'') \1\ requires registered investment companies (``funds'') and

certain principal underwriters, broker-dealers, investment advisers and

depositors of funds to maintain and preserve records as prescribed by

Commission rules. Rule 31a-1 \2\ specifies the books and records that

each of these entities must maintain. Rule 31a-2,\3\ which was adopted

on April 17, 1944, specifies the time periods that entities must retain

books and records required to be maintained under rule 31a-1.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 80a-30(a)(1).

    \2\ 17 CFR 270.31a-1.

    \3\ 17 CFR 270.31a-2.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 31a-2 requires the following:

    1. Every fund must preserve permanently, and in an easily

accessible place for the first two years, all books and records

required under rule 31a-1(b)(1)-(4).\4\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 17 CFR 270.31a-1(b)(1)-(4). These include, among other

records, journals detailing daily purchases and sales of securities

or contracts to purchase and sell securities, general and auxiliary

ledgers reflecting all asset, liability, reserve, capital, income

and expense accounts, separate ledgers reflecting, separately for

each portfolio security as of the trade date all ``long'' and

``short'' positions carried by the fund for its own account, and

corporate charters, certificates of incorporation and by-laws.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Every fund must preserve for at least six years, and in an

easily accessible place for the first two years:

    a. All books and records required under rule 31a-1(b)(5)-(12); \5\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 270.31a-1(b)(5)-(12). These include, among other

records, records of each brokerage order given in connection with

purchases and sales of securities by the fund, all other portfolio

purchases, records of all puts, calls, spreads, straddles or other

options in which the fund has an interest, has granted, or has

guaranteed, records of proof of money balances in all ledger

accounts, files of all advisory material received from the

investment adviser, and memoranda identifying persons, committees or

groups authorizing the purchase or sale of securities for the fund.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    b. All vouchers, memoranda, correspondence, checkbooks, bank

statements, canceled checks, cash reconciliations, canceled stock

certificates and all schedules that support each computation of net

asset value of fund shares;

    c. Any advertisement, pamphlet, circular, form letter or other

sales literature addressed or intended for distribution to prospective

investors;

    d. Any record of the initial determination that a director is not

an interested person of the fund, and each subsequent determination

that the director is not an interested person of the fund, including

any questionnaire and any other document used to determine that a

director is not an interested person of the company;

    e. Any materials used by the disinterested directors of a fund to

determine that a person who is acting as legal counsel to those

directors is an independent legal counsel; and

    f. Any documents or other written information considered by the

directors of the fund pursuant to section 15(c) of the Act in approving

the terms or renewal of a contract or agreement between the company and

an investment advisor.

    3. Every underwriter, broker or dealer that is a majority-owned

subsidiary of a fund must preserve records required to be preserved by

brokers and dealers under rules adopted under section 17 of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 \6\ (``section 17'') for the periods

established in those rules.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. Every depositor of any fund, and every principal underwriter of

any fund other than a closed-end fund, must preserve for at least six

years records required to be preserved by brokers and dealers under

rules adopted under section 17 to the extent the records are necessary

or appropriate to record the entity's transactions with the fund.

    5. Every investment adviser that is a majority-owned subsidiary of

a fund must preserve the records required to be maintained by

investment advisers under rules adopted under section 204 of the

Investment Advisers Act of 1940 \7\ (``section 204'') for the periods

specified in those rules.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 80b-4.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    6. Every investment adviser that is not a majority-owned subsidiary

of a fund must preserve for at least six years records required to be

maintained by registered investment advisers under rules adopted under

section 204 to the extent the records are necessary or appropriate to

reflect the adviser's transactions with the fund.

    The records required to be maintained and preserved under this part

may be maintained and preserved for the required time by, or on behalf

of, a fund on (i) micrographic media, including microfilm, microfiche,

or any similar medium, or (ii) electronic storage media, including any

digital storage medium or system that meets the terms of this section.

The fund, or person that maintains and preserves records on its behalf,

must arrange and index the records in a way that permits easy location,

access, and retrieval of any particular record.\8\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ In addition, the fund, or whoever maintains the documents

for the fund must provide promptly any of the following that the

Commission (by its examiners or other representatives) or the

directors of the fund may request: (A) A legible, true, and complete

copy of the record in the medium and format in which it is stored;

(B) a legible, true, and complete printout of the record; and (C)

means to access, view, and print the records; and separately store,

for the time required for preservation of the original record, a

duplicate copy of the record on any medium allowed by this section.

In the case of records retained on electronic storage media, the

fund, or person that maintains and preserves records on its behalf,

must establish and maintain procedures: (i) To maintain and preserve

the records, so as to reasonably safeguard them from loss,

alteration, or destruction; (ii) to limit access to the records to

properly authorized personnel, the directors of the fund, and the

Commission (including its examiners and other representatives); and

(iii) to reasonably ensure that any reproduction of a non-electronic

original record on electronic storage media is complete, true, and

legible when retrieved.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission periodically inspects the operations of all funds to

ensure their compliance with the provisions of the Act and the rules

under the Act. The Commission staff spends a significant portion of

their time in these inspections reviewing the information contained in

the books and records required to be kept by rule 31a-1 and to be

preserved by rule 31a-2.

    There are approximately 4,522 registered investment companies

(``funds'') as of September 30, 2009, all of which are required to

comply with rule 31a-2. Based on conversations with representatives of

the fund industry and past estimates, our staff estimates that each

fund currently spends 220 hours per year complying with rule 31a-2.

Based on these estimates, our staff estimates that the total annual

burden for a fund to comply with rule 31a-2, is 220 hours, with a total

annual burden for all funds of 994,840 hours.\9\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: 4,522

registered investment companies x 220 hours = 994,840 total hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The hour burden estimates for retaining records under rule 31a-2

are based on our experience with registrants and our experience with

similar requirements under the Act and the rules under the Act. The

number of burden hours may vary depending on, among other things, the

complexity of the fund, the issues faced by the fund, and the number of

series and classes of the fund. The estimated average burden hours are

made solely for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act and are not

derived from quantitative, comprehensive, or even representative

survey or study of the burdens associated with our rules and forms.

    The Commission staff estimates the average cost of preserving books

and records required by rule 31a-2, to be approximately $70,000

annually per fund. As discussed previously, there are approximately

4,522 funds currently operating, for a total cost of preserving records

as required by rule 31a-2 of $316,540,000 per year.\10\ Our staff

understands, however, based on conversations with representatives of

the fund industry, that funds would already spend approximately half of

this amount ($158,270,000) to preserve these same books and records, as

they are also necessary to prepare financial statements, meet various

state reporting requirements, and prepare their annual federal and

state income tax returns. Therefore, we estimate that the total annual

cost burden for funds as a result of compliance with rule 31a-2 is

$158,270,000 per year.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: 4,522

funds x $70,000 = $316,540,000.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    These estimates of average costs are made solely for the purposes

of the Paperwork Reduction Act. The estimate is not derived from a

comprehensive or even a representative survey or study of the costs of

Commission rules. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is

not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid OMB control number.

    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collections of

information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions

of the Commission, including whether the information has practical

utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burdens

of the collections of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,

utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burdens of the collections of information on respondents,

including through the use of automated collection techniques or other

forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to

comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this

publication.

    Please direct your written comments to Charles Boucher, Director/

CIO, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley Martinson, 6432

General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an e-mail to: PRA--

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

    Dated: October 19, 2009.

Florence E. Harmon,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-25487 Filed 10-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P