[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9166-9169]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3618]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

 [Docket No. FAA-2012-0107; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-018-AD;
Amendment 39-16955; AD 2012-03-51]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airplanes Originally Manufactured by
Lockheed for the Military as P2V Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
airplanes originally manufactured by Lockheed for the military as P2V
airplanes. This emergency AD was sent previously to all known U.S.
owners and operators of these airplanes. This AD requires cleaning of
the forward lower spar cap between wing stations 40 and 84.5 (right and
left), and doing a detailed inspection for cracks, working fasteners,
and other anomalies, including surface damage in the form of a nick,
gouge, or corrosion; and repairing if necessary. This AD was prompted
by a report of a significant crack in the principle wing structure. We
are issuing this AD to detect and

correct cracks, working fasteners, and other anomalies in the principle
wing structure, which could cause significant loss of structural
integrity of the wing.

DATES: This AD is effective March 2, 2012 to all persons except those
persons to whom it was made immediately effective by Emergency AD 2012-
03-51, issued on February 6, 2012, which contained the requirements of
this amendment.
    We must receive comments on this AD by April 2, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Caldwell, Aerospace Engineer,
Denver Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 26805 East 68th Avenue,
Denver, CO 80249; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    On February 6, 2012, we issued Emergency AD 2012-03-51, which
requires cleaning of the forward lower spar cap between wing stations
40 and 84.5 (right and left), and doing a detailed inspection for
cracks, working fasteners, and other anomalies, including surface
damage in the form of a nick, gouge, or corrosion; and repairing if
necessary. That AD also requires sending inspection results (both
positive and negative) to the FAA. This AD was prompted by a report of
a significant crack in the principle wing structure on a Neptune
Aviation Service, Inc. Model SP-2H (P2V-7) airplane. A crack
approximately 24 inches long was found in the left side wing front spar
and lower skin just outboard of the fuselage side of wing station 40.
The crack propagated through the wing front spar web, lower chord, and
wing lower skin through stringer No. 22 and aft to stringer No. 21. The
cause of the cracking is unknown at this time. This condition, if not
detected and corrected, could result in significant loss of structural
integrity of the wing.

FAA's Determination

    We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

AD Requirements

    This AD requires cleaning of the forward lower spar cap between
wing stations 40 and 84.5 (right and left), and doing a detailed
inspection for cracks, working fasteners, and other anomalies,
including surface damage in the form of a nick, gouge, or corrosion;
and repairing if necessary. This AD also requires sending inspection
results (both positive and negative) to the FAA.

Interim Action

    We consider this AD interim action. If final action is later
identified, we might consider further rulemaking then.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because of a
report of a significant crack in the principle wing structure on a
Neptune Aviation Service, Inc. Model SP-2H (P2V-7) airplane. This
condition, if not detected and corrected, could result in significant
loss of structural integrity of the wing. Therefore, we find that
notice and opportunity for prior public comment are impracticable and
that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than
30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public
comment. However, we invite you to send any written data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number FAA-2012-0107 and
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-018-AD at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 38 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Action              Labor cost          Parts cost          Cost per product     Cost on U.S.  operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection              Up to 80 work-                   $100   Up to $6,900...........  Up to $262,200.
                         hours x $85 per
                         hour = $6,800.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No definitive data are available for repair costs at this time.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2012-03-51 Lockheed (Original Manufacturer): Amendment 39-16955;
Docket No. FAA-2012-0107; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-018-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective March 2, 2012 to all persons except those
persons to whom it was made immediately effective by Emergency AD
2012-03-51, issued on February 6, 2012, which contained the
requirements of this amendment.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all of the airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), (c)(4), (c)(5), (c)(6), and (c)(7) of this
AD, certificated in any category:
    (1) Aero Union Corporation Model SP-2H (P2V-7) airplanes;
    (2) Central Air Service, Inc. Model SP-2H (P2V-7) airplanes;
    (3) Evergreen Air Center Model SP-2H (P2V-7) airplanes;
    (4) Hawkins and Powers Aviation, Inc. Model HP-P2V-7 airplanes;
    (5) Minden Air Corp Model SP-2H (P2V-7) airplanes;
    (6) Neptune Aviation Service, Inc. Model SP-2H (P2V-7)
airplanes; and
    (7) USDA Forest Service (type certificate previously held by
U.S. Department of Agriculture) Model P2V-5F (SP-2E) airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of a significant crack in the
principle wing structure on a Neptune Aviation Service, Inc. Model
SP-2H (P2V-7) airplane. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
cracks, working fasteners, and other anomalies in the principle wing
structure, which could cause significant loss of structural
integrity of the wing.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified.

(g) Inspections

    Within one day after the effective date of this AD: Do the
actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this
AD.
    (1) Gain access to the wing spar box between wing stations 40
and 84.5 (right and left sides of the airplane) through an access
panel that allows for inspecting the forward lower spar cap assembly
and remove or reposition any internal fuel bladder assembly that
impedes access.
    (2) Clean the exposed surface of the forward lower spar cap
between wing stations 40 and 84.5 (right and left), and do a
detailed inspection for cracks, working fasteners, and other
anomalies, including surface damage in the form of a nick, gouge, or
corrosion, of the forward lower spar cap between wing stations 40
and 84.5 (right and left).
    (3) If any crack, working fastener, or other anomaly is found
during any inspection required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD,
before further flight, repair in accordance with a method approved
by the Manager, Denver Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA. For
a repair method to be approved by the Manager, Denver ACO, as
required by this paragraph, the Manager's approval letter must
specifically refer to this AD.

(h) Definition

    For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is: ``An
intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or assembly
to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at an
intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning and
elaborate procedures may be required.

(i) Reporting

    Within 10 days after doing the inspection required by paragraph
(g) of this AD: Submit a report of the findings (both positive and
negative) of the inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD to
the Denver ACO, FAA, Attention: Roger Caldwell, 26805 East 68th
Avenue, Denver, CO 80249; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-
mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The report must include a detailed
figure or picture of all cracks and damage and the location,
orientation, and size of all cracks and damage. The report must also
include the airplane serial number, the number of landings and
flight hours on the airplane, and a description of how the airplane
is operated (e.g., firefighting, photography, etc.).

(j) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to
the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

(k) Special Flight Permit

    Special flight permits, as described in Section 21.197 and
Section 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199), are not allowed unless approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this AD.

(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Denver ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,

send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the
person identified in the Related Information section of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(m) Related Information

    For further information about this AD, contact: Roger Caldwell,
Aerospace Engineer, Denver Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 26805
East 68th Avenue, Denver, CO 80249; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 303-
342-1088; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    None.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 9, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-3618 Filed 2-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63594-63596]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25376]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 174 and 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0008; FRL-9916-03]

Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of
Pesticide Chemicals In or On Various Commodities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the Agency's receipt of several
initial filings of pesticide petitions requesting the establishment or
modification of regulations for residues of pesticide chemicals in or
on various commodities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 24, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number and the pesticide petition number (PP) of interest as shown
in the body of this document, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD)

(7511P); main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and Daniel Rosenblatt, Registration Division (RD)
(7505P); main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The mailing address for each contact person is:
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. As part of the
mailing address, include the contact person's name, division, and mail
code. The division to contact is listed at the end of each pesticide
petition summary.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this
action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT for the division listed at the end of the
pesticide petition summary of interest.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low-income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.

II. What action is the Agency taking?

    EPA is announcing its receipt of several pesticide petitions filed
under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
21 U.S.C. 346a, requesting the establishment or modification of
regulations in 40 CFR parts 174 and 180 for residues of pesticide
chemicals in or on various food commodities. The Agency is taking
public comment on the requests before responding to the petitioners.
EPA is not proposing any particular action at this time. EPA has
determined that the pesticide petitions described in this document
contain the data or information prescribed in FFDCA section 408(d)(2);
however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted
data at this time or whether the data support granting of the pesticide
petitions. After considering the public comments, EPA intends to
evaluate whether and what action may be warranted. Additional data may
be needed before EPA can make a final determination on these pesticide
petitions.
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a summary of each of the petitions
that are the subject of this document, prepared by the petitioner, is
included in a docket EPA has created for each rulemaking. The docket
for each of the petitions is available at http://www.regulations.gov.
    As specified in FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), EPA
is publishing notice of the petition so that the public has an
opportunity to comment on this request for the establishment or
modification of regulations for residues of pesticides in or on food
commodities. Further information on the petition may be obtained
through the petition summary referenced in this unit.

New Tolerance

    1. PP 4G8247. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0379). Cheminova, Inc., 1600 Wilson
Blvd., Suite 700, Arlington, VA 22209-2510, requests to establish a
tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the fungicide flutriafol,
()-[alpha]-(2-fluorophenyl)-[alpha]-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-
1,2,4-triazole-1-ethanol, including its metabolites and degradates, in
or on corn, sweet, forage at 5 parts per million (ppm); corn, sweet,
kernel plus cob with husks removed at 0.01 ppm; and corn, sweet, stover
at 15 ppm. The Zeneca Agrochemicals Method RAM 219/04, entitled ``The
Determination of Residues of Flutriafol (R122450) in Crops,'' dated
July 5, 2000, and various subsequent modifications is used to measure
and evaluate the chemical flutriafol. RD
    2. PP 4F8277. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0496). Syngenta Crop Protection,
LLC, 410 Swing Rd., Greensboro, NC 27419, requests to establish a
tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the fungicide,
fludioxonil, in or on rapeseed, subgroup 20A, except flax seed at 0.01
parts per million (ppm). The Syngenta Crop Protection Method AG-597B is
used to measure and evaluate the chemical fludioxonil, 4-(2, 2-
difluoro-1,3-benzodioxol-4-yl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carbonitrile. RD

New Tolerance Exemption

    1. PP 3F8221. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0560). SciReg International, 12733
Director's Loop, Woodbridge, VA 22192, on behalf of Andermatt
Biocontrol AG., Stahlermatten 6 CH-6146, Grossdietwil, Switzerland,
requests to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance
for residues of the microbial pesticide, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
strain FZB42, in or on all food commodities. The pesticide is intended
to control soil borne diseases. The petitioner believes no analytical
method is needed because Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain FZB42 is
virtually non-toxic and is not pathogenic. Andermatt Biocontrol AG is,
therefore, submitting a petition to establish an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance and an analytical method is not required.
BPPD
    2. PP 4F8251. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0457). J.R. Simplot Company, 5369 W.
Irving St., Boise, IN 83706, requests to establish an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance for residues of the plant incorporated
protectant (PIP), Potato Late Blight Resistance Gene (also known as
Rpi-vnt1), in or on potato. The petitioner believes no

analytical method is needed because the petitioner is seeking an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. BPPD
    3. PP 4F8275. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0454). Monsanto Company, 800 North
Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63167, requests to establish an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of the
plant-incorporated protectant (PIP), Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A.105
protein, in or on soybean. The petitioner believes no analytical method
is needed because the petitioner is seeking an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. BPPD
    4. PP 4F8276. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0454). Monsanto Company, 800 North
Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, Missouri 63167, requests to establish an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of the
plant-incorporated protectant (PIP), Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2Ab2
protein, in or on soybean. The petitioner believes no analytical method
is needed because the petitioner is seeking an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. BPPD
    5. PP IN-10661. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0122). Exponent, 1150 Connecticut
Ave. NW., Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20036, on behalf of Clariant
Corporation, 4000 Monroe Rd., Charlotte, NC 28205, requests to
establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues
of C.I. Pigment Yellow 1 (butanamide, 2-(4-methyl-2-nitrophenyl)azo-3-
oxo-N-phenyl-) (CAS No. 2512-29-0) when used as a pesticide inert
ingredient in pesticide formulations for pre-harvest use (seed
treatments) not to exceed 10% weight (wt)/wt. The petitioner believes
no analytical method is needed because it is not required for the
establishment of a tolerance exemption for inert ingredients. RD
    6. PP IN-10682. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0265). Exponet, Inc., 1150
Connecticut Ave. NW., Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20036, on behalf of
Huntsman Corp., 8600 Gosling Rd., The Woodlands, TX 77381, requests to
establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues
of n-butyl benzoate (CAS No. 136-60-7) when used as a pesticide inert
ingredient in pesticide formulations for pre- and post-harvest use and
in antimicrobial formulations (food-contact surface sanitizing
solutions). The petitioner believes no analytical method is needed
because it is not required for the establishment of a tolerance
exemption for inert ingredients.

RD

List of Subjects in Parts 174 and 180

    Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives,
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: October 16, 2014.
Daniel J. Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-25376 Filed 10-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P