(570,439)
PWS change in burden after adjustments.
Note: Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.

                                  Exhibit 13
       Adjustments to Primacy Agency Burden from Previous ICR Estimates

                                   Activity
                    Previous Annual Burden Estimate (Hours)
                      2018 Annual Burden Estimate (Hours)
                        Annual Change in Burden (Hours)
                          Reason for Change in Burden
Consumer Confidence Reports
                                                                         73,912
                                                                         45,280
                                                                       (28,632)
The decrease in burden is attributable to the use of updated system inventories. Since the previous ICR, the number of CWSs has decreased, and state burden is based on system inventory.
Variance and Exemptions
                                                                              -
                                                                              -
                                                                              -
The lack of burden is attributed to the expectation that no systems are expected to apply for variances or exemptions. This results in no burden estimated for primacy agencies for this rule. Currently, the rule requires primacy agencies to review each small system variance to determine if the PWS continues to meet eligibility criteria. The burden associated with this reporting and recordkeeping requirement is assumed to be negligible.
Capacity Development
                                                                        102,851
                                                                        262,430
                                                                        159,579
The increase in burden is attributable to shifting burden from PWS to states as a result of expert opinion and industry consultation resulting in increased burden per state.
General State Primacy
                                                                      1,242,199
                                                                      1,538,721
                                                                        296,522
The increase in burden is attributable to expert opinion and estimating burden as a function of burden per PWS per state instead of responses per state. It is partially offset as a result of improved data entry capacity from adopting the cloud-based reporting data system.
Public Notification
                                                                        116,665
                                                                        133,714
                                                                         17,049
The increase in burden is attributable to the decrease in PWS inventory and modification to the model based on industry feedback.
Operator Certification Program
                                                                            832
                                                                            912
                                                                             80
The increase in burden is attributable to the use of updated system inventories and updates to and industry QA of the model and is partially offset by decreased system inventories.
Tribal Operator Certification Program
                                                                            N/A
                                                                            N/A
                                                                            N/A
N/A
Constructed Conveyances
                                                                            N/A
                                                                            N/A
                                                                            N/A
The lack of burden is due to zeroing out the inventory to reflect that no new constructed conveyances are expected to be built going forward.
Proficiency Testing
                                                                            N/A
                                                                            N/A
                                                                            N/A
N/A
TOTAL
                                                                      1,536,459
                                                                      1,981,057
                                                                        444,598
Adjusted Primacy Agency Burden
Note: Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.

                                  Exhibit 14
         Adjustments to Laboratory Burden from Previous ICR Estimates

                                   Activity
                    Previous Annual Burden Estimate (Hours)
                      2018 Annual Burden Estimate (Hours)
                        Annual Change in Burden (Hours)
                          Reason for Change in Burden
Consumer Confidence Reports
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
N/A
Variance and Exemptions
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
N/A
Capacity Development
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
N/A
General State Primacy
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
N/A
Public Notification
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
N/A
Operator Certification Program
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
N/A
Tribal Operator Certification Program
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
N/A
Constructed Conveyances
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
                                                                             -
N/A
Proficiency Testing
                                                                        42,892
                                                                        42,893
                                                                             1
Because no updated information was available on the number of certified laboratories, the assumptions from the previous ICR were used, the increase of 1 hour of burden is due to rounding error in the model.
TOTAL
                                                                         42,892
                                                                         42,893
                                                                              1
Adjusted Laboratory Burden
Note: Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.

      Exhibit 15 shows the effect of these adjustments on the bottom line burden. Subtracting 570,439 hours to account for the adjustment to PWS burden, adding 679,498 hours to account for the adjustment to primacy agency burden, and a 1-hour change in laboratory burden yields 3,878,272 hours.

                                  Exhibit 15
Adjustments to Activities Carried Forward from Previous ICRs
(Includes PWS, Primacy Agency, and Laboratory Burden)

                                    Action
                              Annual Burden Hours
                               Brief Explanation
N/A
                                                                     3,769,213
Inventory after restructuring adjustments, and other adjustments to burden (see Exhibit 11)
Subtract
                                                                      (570,439)
Adjustments for PWS activities carried forward from previous ICRs (see Exhibit 12)
Subtract
                                                                       444,598
Adjustment for primacy agency activities carried forward from previous ICRs (see Exhibit 13)
N/A
                                                                             1
Adjustment for laboratory activities carried forward from previous ICRs (see Exhibit 14)
Total
                                                                     3,643,372
Equals hours requested in 2018 PWSS Program ICR. (See Exhibit 9)
Note: Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.

6(g)	Burden Statement

      The public reporting burden for collections included in this ICR is detailed in Exhibit 15 above. The annual respondent burden is estimated to average approximately 3.6 million hours, of which 1.6 million hours are attributable to PWSs, 2.0 million hours to primacy agencies, and 0.04 million hours to laboratories. These estimates include time for gathering information as well as developing and maintaining records.

      Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by people to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide information to or for a federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology, and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information collection unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.

      To facilitate comment on the EPA's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0443, which is available for online viewing at www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), WJC West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the Water Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. An electronic version of the public docket is available at www.regulations.gov. This site can be used to submit or view public comments, to access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. When in the system, select "search," then key in the Docket ID Number identified above. Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number (EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0443) and the OMB Control Number 2040-0090 in any correspondence.


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 206 (Thursday, October 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49604]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23292]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL18-13-000]

Transource Kansas, LLC; Notice of Institution of Section 206
Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On October 19, 2017, the Commission issued an order in Docket No.
EL18-13-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16
U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into whether the
formula rate protocols of Transource Kansas, LLC may be unjust,
unreasonable, unduly discriminatory or preferential. Transource Kansas,
LLC, 161 FERC 61,050 (2017).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL18-13-000, established
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication
of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL18-13-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21
days of the date of issuance of the order.

    Dated: October 19, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-23292 Filed 10-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22590-22592]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08862]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PF15-33-000]

Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Assessment for the Planned Northern Lights 2017 Expansion
Project, Request for Comments on Environmental Issues

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of the Northern Lights 2017 Expansion
Project involving construction and operation of facilities by Northern
Natural Gas Company (Northern) in Dakota County, Minnesota. The
Commission will use this EA in its decision-making process to determine
whether the project is in the public convenience and necessity.
    This notice announces the opening of the scoping process the
Commission will use to gather input from the public and interested
agencies on the project. You can make a difference by providing us with
your specific comments or concerns about the project. Your comments
should focus on the potential environmental effects, reasonable
alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impacts.
Your input will help the Commission staff determine what issues they
need to evaluate in the EA. To ensure that your comments are timely and
properly recorded, please send your comments so

that the Commission receives them in Washington, DC on or before May
11, 2016.
    If you sent comments on this project to the Commission before the
opening of this docket on September 28, 2015, you will need to file
those comments in Docket No. PF15-33-000 to ensure they are considered
as part of this proceeding.
    This notice is being sent to the Commission's current environmental
mailing list for this project. State and local government
representatives should notify their constituents of this planned
project and encourage them to comment on their areas of concern.
    If you are a landowner receiving this notice, a pipeline company
representative may contact you about the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the planned facilities. The company
would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement. However, if
the Commission approves the project, that approval conveys with it the
right of eminent domain. Therefore, if easement negotiations fail to
produce an agreement, the pipeline company could initiate condemnation
proceedings where compensation would be determined in accordance with
state law.
    A fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural
Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I Need To Know?'' is available for
viewing on the FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov). This fact sheet addresses
a number of typically asked questions, including the use of eminent
domain and how to participate in the Commission's proceedings.

Public Participation

    For your convenience, there are three methods you can use to submit
your comments to the Commission. The Commission will provide equal
consideration to all comments received, whether filed in written form
or provided verbally. The Commission encourages electronic filing of
comments and has expert staff available to assist you at<PHONE_NUMBER>
or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please carefully follow these instructions so that
your comments are properly recorded.
    (1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. This is an easy method for submitting brief,
text-only comments on a project;
    (2) You can file your comments electronically by using the eFiling
feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. With eFiling, you can provide comments in a
variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your submission.
New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking on
``eRegister.'' If you are filing a comment on a particular project,
please select ``Comment on a Filing'' as the filing type; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the following address. Be sure to reference the project docket number
(PF15-33-000) with your submission: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Room 1A,
Washington, DC 20426.

Summary of the Planned Project

    Northern plans to construct and operate approximately 4.8 miles of
branch line loop \1\ extensions in Sherburne and Isanti counties,
Minnesota, and to install an additional 15,900-horsepower compressor
unit to an existing compressor station site in Rice County, Minnesota.
The Northern Lights 2017 Expansion Project would allow Northern to
transport an incremental load of 76 million cubic feet on Northern's
existing system. According to Northern, its project would meet the firm
transportation service elected during an October 2015 open season by
Xcel Energy Inc., CenterPoint Energy, Al-Corn Clean Fuel, and Midwest
Natural Gas, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A pipeline loop is a segment of pipe constructed parallel to
an existing pipeline to increase capacity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Northern Lights 2017 Expansion Project would consist of the
following facilities:
     2.0 miles extending the existing 8-inch-diameter Princeton
branch line loop and a new associated valve;
     2.8 miles extending the existing 12-inch-diameter St.
Cloud branch line loop and a new associated valve;
     a 15,900-horsepower Solar Mars turbine compressor unit at
the Faribault Compressor Station; and
     cathodic protection test stations.
    The general location of the project facilities is shown in appendix
1.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The appendices referenced in this notice will not appear in
the Federal Register. Copies of the appendices were sent to all
those receiving this notice in the mail and are available at
www.ferc.gov using the link called ``eLibrary'' or from the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, or call<PHONE_NUMBER>. For instructions on
connecting to eLibrary, refer to page 7 of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Land Requirements for Construction

    Construction of the planned facilities would disturb about 112.4
acres of land for the aboveground facilities and the pipeline. In
addition to its existing facilities, Northern would maintain about 2.1
acres for permanent operation of the project's facilities following
construction; the remaining acreage would be restored and revert to
former uses. Most of the facilities would be located within Northern's
existing easements, offset 20 to 25 feet from Northern's existing
pipelines, and thus not require any new permanent easements.

The EA Process

    The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could
result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us
\3\ to discover and address concerns the public may have about
proposals. This process is referred to as scoping. The main goal of the
scoping process is to focus the analysis in the EA on the important
environmental issues. By this notice, the Commission requests public
comments on the scope of the issues to address in the EA. We will
consider all filed comments during the preparation of the EA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ ``We,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the Commission's Office of Energy Projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the EA we will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of
the construction and operation of the planned project under these
general headings: Geology and soils; land use; water resources,
fisheries, and wetlands; cultural resources; vegetation and wildlife;
air quality and noise; endangered and threatened species; public
safety; and cumulative impacts.
    We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the planned project
or portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to lessen
or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
    Although no formal application has been filed, we have already
initiated our NEPA review under the Commission's pre-filing process.
The purpose of the pre-filing process is to encourage early involvement
of interested stakeholders and to identify and resolve issues before
the FERC receives an application. As part of our pre-filing review, we
have begun to contact some federal and state agencies to discuss their
involvement in the scoping process and the preparation of the EA.
    The EA will present our independent analysis of the issues. The EA
will be available in the public record through eLibrary. Depending on
the comments received during the scoping process, we

may also publish and distribute the EA to the public for an allotted
comment period. We will consider all comments on the EA before we make
our recommendations to the Commission. To ensure we have the
opportunity to consider and address your comments, please carefully
follow the instructions in the Public Participation section, beginning
on page 2.
    With this notice, we are asking agencies with jurisdiction by law
and/or special expertise with respect to the environmental issues
related to this project to formally cooperate with us in the
preparation of the EA.\4\ Agencies that would like to request
cooperating agency status should follow the instructions for filing
comments provided under the Public Participation section of this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Council on Environmental Quality regulations addressing
cooperating agency responsibilities are at Title 40, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 1501.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultations Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act

    In accordance with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
implementing regulations for section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, we are using this notice to initiate consultation
with the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and to
solicit their views and those of other government agencies, interested
Indian tribes, and the public on the project's potential effects on
historic properties.\5\ We will define the project-specific Area of
Potential Effects (APE) in consultation with the SHPO as the project
develops. On natural gas facility projects, the APE at a minimum
encompasses all areas subject to ground disturbance (examples include
construction right-of-way, contractor/pipe storage yards, compressor
stations, and access roads). Our EA for this project will document our
findings on the impacts on historic properties and summarize the status
of consultations under section 106.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation regulations
are at Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 800. Those
regulations define historic properties as any prehistoric or
historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in
or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Environmental Mailing List

    The environmental mailing list includes federal, state, and local
government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American tribes; other
interested parties; and local libraries and newspapers. This list also
includes all affected landowners (as defined in the Commission's
regulations) who are potential right-of-way grantors, whose property
may be used temporarily for project purposes, or who own homes within
certain distances of aboveground facilities, and anyone who submits
comments on the project. We will update the environmental mailing list
as the analysis proceeds to ensure that we send the information related
to this environmental review to all individuals, organizations, and
government entities interested in and/or potentially affected by the
planned project.
    If we publish and distribute the EA, copies will be sent to the
environmental mailing list for public review and comment. If you would
prefer to receive a paper copy of the document instead of the CD
version or would like to remove your name from the mailing list, please
return the attached Information Request (appendix 2).

Becoming an Intervenor

    Once Northern files its application with the Commission, you may
want to become an ``intervenor'' which is an official party to the
Commission's proceeding. Intervenors play a more formal role in the
process and are able to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be heard
by the courts if they choose to appeal the Commission's final ruling.
An intervenor formally participates in the proceeding by filing a
request to intervene. Motions to intervene are more fully described at
http://www.ferc.gov/resources/guides/how-to/intervene.asp. Instructions
for becoming an intervenor are in the ``Document-less Intervention
Guide'' under the ``e-filing'' link on the Commission's Web site.
Please note that the Commission will not accept requests for intervenor
status at this time. You must wait until the Commission receives a
formal application for the project.

Additional Information

    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field (i.e., PF15-
33). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.
    Finally, public meetings or site visits will be posted on the
Commission's calendar located at www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along with other related information.

    Dated: April 11, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-08862 Filed 4-15-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: November 12, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 219)]
[Notices]
[Page 66889]
[DOCID:fr12no08-78]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 459-238]

Ameren/UE; Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment

November 4, 2008.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR Part
380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879) the Office of Energy Projects has
prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for an application filed by
Ameren/UE (licensee) on September 10, 2008, requesting Commission
approval to permit Utley Development Company, LLC, to construct one new
multi-slip boat dock at the Summer Hill development. The project would
be located near mile marker 31.2+5.4 of in Barnes Hollow Cove of the
Lake of the Ozarks in Camden County, Missouri. The dock would have a
total of 14 boat slips, with 12 slips 32 feet long and 12 feet wide and
2 slips 32 feet long and 10 feet wide and would include a central
walkway 4 feet wide. No fuel-dispensing and sewage-pumping facilities
or dredging are proposed.
    The EA evaluates the environmental impacts that would result from
approving the licensee's proposal. The EA finds that approval of the
application would not constitute a major federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment.
    The EA is attached to a Commission order titled ``Order Modifying
and Approving Non-Project Use of Project Lands and Waters'' which was
issued October 31, 2008, and is available for review and reproduction
at the Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street,
NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426. The EA may also be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number (P-459) excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free
at 1-866-208-3372, or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-26782 Filed 11-10-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46819]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21635]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4335-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

Virgin Islands; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the
territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands (FEMA-4335-DR), dated September 7,
2017, and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 28, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated September 26, 2017, the President amended the cost-sharing
arrangements regarding Federal funds provided under the authority of
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42
U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford Act''), in a letter to Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of
Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the
territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands resulting from Hurricane Irma
during the period of September 5-7, 2017, is of sufficient severity
and magnitude that special cost sharing arrangements are warranted
regarding Federal funds provided under the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.
(the ``Stafford Act'').
    Therefore, I amend my declarations of September 7, 2017 and
September 9, 2017, to authorize a 100 percent Federal cost share for
debris removal and emergency protective measures, including direct
Federal assistance, for 180 days from the start of the incident
period.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-21635 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P