[Federal Register: April 5, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 65)]
[Notices]
[Page 16777-16778]
[DOCID:fr05ap07-60]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings  1

March 30, 2007.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
    Docket Numbers: EG07-44-000.
    Applicants: Brush Cogeneration Partners.
    Description: Altura Power, LP submits notice of self-certification
of exempt wholesale generator status under EG07-14.
    Filed Date: 3/28/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070330-0018.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 18, 2007.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER07-371-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. submits its response to
FERC's 2/27/07 additional information request regarding a proposal to
revise Schedule 2 of its Open Access Transmission Tariff.
    Filed Date: 3/29/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070330-0013.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, April 19, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-663-000.
    Applicants: Conectiv Energy Supply, Inc.
    Description: Conectiv Energy Supply, Inc requests authorization to
make wholesale power sales to its affiliate Delmarva Power & Light Co
under the terms of CESI's market-based rate tariff.
    Filed Date: 3/27/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070328-0025.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 17, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-665-000.
    Applicants: RC Cape May Holdings, LLC.
    Description: RC Cape May Holdings, LLC submits a rate schedule that
specifies its revenue requirement for providing Reactive Support and
Voltage Control from Generation Sources Service.
    Filed Date: 3/27/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070330-0010.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 17, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-666-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc
submits an executed Small Generator Interconnection Agreement with
Hardin Hilltop Wind, LLC et al.
    Filed Date: 3/27/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070330-0009.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 17, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-668-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits an executed Wholesale
Market Participation Agreement with Emporia Hydropower Limited
Partnership et al.
    Filed Date: 3/28/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070329-0069
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 18, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-670-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Services, Inc.
    Description: Entergy Services, Inc acting as agent for the Entergy
Operating Companies submits an executed Network Integration
Transmission Service Agreement w/Louisiana Energy and Power Authority
etc.
    Filed Date: 3/28/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070330-0021.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 18, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-671-000.
    Applicants: Trigen-St. Louis Energy Corporation.
    Description: Trigen-St Louis Energy Corporation submits an
Application for order granting blanket approvals, proposed market-based
rate tariff.
    Filed Date: 3/28/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070330-0017.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 18, 2007.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES07-28-000.
    Applicants: PSEG Nuclear LLC; PSEG Fossil LLC; PSEG Energy. Trade &
Resources LLC.
    Description: PSEG Power Companies submit their request for Blanket
Authorization to Issue Securities.
    Filed Date: 3/28/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070328-5047.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 18, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic

service, persons with Internet access who will eFile a document and/or
be listed as a contact for an intervenor must create and validate an
eRegistration account using the eRegistration link. Select the eFiling
link to log on and submit the intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-6332 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 81413]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32641]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on a Request for Change in Designation
of On-Airport Property Purchased With Airport Improvement Program (AIP)
Funding From Aeronautical to Non-Aeronautical at the Lancaster Airport,
Lititz, PA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of a request for a change in designation of on-airport
property purchased with AIP funding from aeronautical to non-
aeronautical use.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is requesting public comment on the Lancaster Airport
Authority's proposal to change 6.191 acres of airport property at
Lancaster Airport, Lititz, Pennsylvania from aeronautical to non-
aeronautical use. This acreage was purchased with federal financial
assistance through the Airport Improvement Program under Grant
Agreements 3-42-0049-13-95, 3-42-0049-16-98, and 3-42-0049-19-01 under
49 U.S.C. 47107(c). In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 47107(h), this notice
is required to be published in the Federal Register 30 days before
modifying the land-use assurance that requires the property to be used
for an aeronautical purpose.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 28, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to
the following address: David Eberly, Manager, Lancaster Airport, 500
Airport Road, Suite G, Lititz, PA 17543-9340,<PHONE_NUMBER> and at the
FAA Harrisburg Airports District Office: Lori K. Pagnanelli, Manager,
Harrisburg Airports District Office, 3905 Hartzdale Dr., Suite 508,
Camp Hill, PA 17011,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Sacavage, Project Manager,
Harrisburg Airports District Office, location listed above.
    The request for change in designation of on-airport property may be
reviewed in person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    The Lancaster Airport Authority requests to change the designation
of 6.191 acres of on-airport property from aeronautical to non-
aeronautical use. No land shall be sold as part of this land request.
The property is situated on the northwest corner of the intersection of
Stauffer Road and Millport Road in Warwick Township. The 6.191 acres
are part of a 29.855 acre parcel that was purchased on June 27, 1997 to
protect the Runway 26 Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) from incompatible
development. The subject area itself, however, is located outside the
designated RPZ. The 6.191 acre area requested to be designated as non-
aeronautical is unable to be utilized for aviation purposes because it
is located across a public road (Millport Road) from the air operations
area and is inaccessible by aircraft. The subject acreage is currently
being used as a yard waste reclamation collection center. The purpose
of this request is to permanently change the designation of the
property given there is no potential for future aviation use, as
demonstrated by the Airport Layout Plan. Subsequent to the
implementation of the proposed redesignation, rents received by the
airport from this property must be used in accordance with FAA's Policy
and Procedures Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue, published in the
Federal Register on February 16, 1999.
    Any person may inspect the request by appointment at the FAA office
address listed above. Interested persons are invited to comment. All
comments will be considered by the FAA to the extent practicable.

    Issued in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, December 17, 2015.
Lori K. Pagnanelli,
Manager, Harrisburg Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 2015-32641 Filed 12-28-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 238 (Monday, December 12, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77128-77131]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31708]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 126

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0966]
RIN 1625-AB82

Alternate Tonnage Threshold for Oil Spill Response Vessels

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing an alternate size threshold
based on the measurement system established under the International
Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969, for Oil Spill
Response Vessels (OSRVs), which are properly certificated under 46 CFR
subchapter L. The present size threshold of 500 gross registered tons
is based on the U.S. regulatory measurement system. This rule provides
an alternative for owners and operators of offshore supply vessels
(OSVs) that may result in an increase in oil spill response capacity
and capability.

DATES: This interim rule is effective December 12, 2011. Comments and
related material must either be submitted to our online docket via
http://www.regulations.gov on or before February 10, 2012 or reach the
Docket Management Facility by that date.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-0966 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
email or call Mr. Brian T. Ellis, Coast Guard Marine Safety Center;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-
9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents for Preamble

I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
    A. Submitting Comments
    B. Viewing Comments and Documents
    C. Privacy Act
    D. Public Meeting
II. Abbreviations
III. Regulatory History
IV. Basis and Purpose
V. Discussion of the Interim Rule
VI. Regulatory Analyses
    A. Regulatory Planning and Review
    B. Small Entities
    C. Assistance for Small Entities
    D. Collection of Information
    E. Federalism
    F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    G. Taking of Private Property
    H. Civil Justice Reform
    I. Protection of Children
    J. Indian Tribal Governments
    K. Energy Effects
    L. Technical Standards
    M. Environment

I. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

A. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-0966), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online, or by fax, mail or hand delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing
address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2011-0966'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change this rule
based on your comments.

B. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-0966'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
If you do not have access to the Internet, you may view the docket
online by visiting the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.

C. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the

individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted
on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may
review a Privacy Act notice regarding our public dockets in the January
17, 2008, issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

D. Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting, but you may submit a
request for one to the docket using one of the methods specified under
ADDRESSES. In your request, explain why you believe a public meeting
would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.

II. Abbreviations

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
GRT Gross Register Tons
GT ITC Gross Tonnage International Tonnage Convention
OSV Offshore Supply Vessel
OSRV Oil Spill Response Vessel
U.S.C. United States Code

III. Regulatory History

    This rule is issued as an interpretive rule as authorized by
section 702 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1996 (the Act)
(Pub. L. 104-324; October 19, 1996) (46 U.S.C. 14104). The Conference
Report on the Act (H. Rept. 104-854) states that, because this rule is
considered to be an interpretive rule under the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.), the notice of proposed
rulemaking, the comment requirements, and the 30-day delay of the
effective date under 5 U.S.C. 553 are not required.\1\ Therefore, this
interpretive rule is effective on the date of publication in the
Federal Register. However, the Coast Guard values input from the
public, and as such, we are issuing this interpretive rule as an
interim rule, and seeking comments from the public. Please see the
section above titled ``Public Participation and Request for Comments.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ House Report 104-854 at p. 116.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Basis and Purpose

    This interpretive rule establishes an alternate tonnage threshold
at 6000 Gross Tonnage International Tonnage Convention (GT ITC) for oil
spill response vessels (OSRVs) that are also certificated as offshore
supply vessels (OSVs). The alternate tonnage framework enacted by the
Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1996 provided a mechanism for the
Coast Guard to regulate vessels under tonnages assigned using the
system of the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships,
1969 (implemented into U.S. law as the ``convention measurement
system''), instead of the U.S. domestic measurement system (now
referred to in U.S. law as the ``regulatory measurement system'')(46
U.S.C. 14104(b)). The selected alternate tonnage threshold is
consistent with a 6000 GT ITC alternate threshold established for OSVs
in 1996.\2\ As discussed further below, this will allow owners of OSVs
regulated under the alternate tonnage framework to also have their
vessels certificated as OSRVs without the need to meet significantly
higher standards applicable to tank vessels.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Offshore Supply Vessels: Alternate Tonnage, 61 FR 66613
(Dec. 18, 1996), amending 46 CFR 125.160.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Use of alternate tonnage facilitates the design, construction, and
operation of vessels without the need for the fitting of undesirable
design features, whose sole purpose is to artificially reduce tonnages
assigned under the regulatory measurement system. Because the
rulemaking provides for optional use of an alternative approach to meet
an existing requirement, there is no mandatory cost to the public. The
authority for this rulemaking is the 1996 Coast Guard Authorization Act
(Pub. L. 104-324), as codified in 46 U.S.C. Sections 3702(f)(2)(A) and
14104(b).

V. Discussion of the Interpretive Rule

    Both domestically and internationally, a vessel's gross or net
tonnage assignment is the basis for applying requirements of a
multitude of laws, regulations, and standards, including the 500 gross
register ton (GRT) size threshold that is the subject of this
interpretive rule. The primary U.S. domestic measurement system used to
assign tonnages to U.S. flag vessels evolved from an older British
measurement system and involves a complex series of exemptions and
deductions. It is now a subset of the regulatory measurement system,
and is called the ``standard measurement system.'' This system is
highly susceptible to manipulation through inclusion of costly and
inefficient design features, such as so-called ``tonnage openings'' and
``deep frames''. Although in 1986 the U.S. implemented the
internationally accepted measurement system of the International
Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969, the standard
measurement system may still be used to measure any U.S. flag vessel,
at the vessel owner's option.
    To help facilitate conversion to tonnage assignments under the
convention measurement system, in 1996 Congress gave the Coast Guard
the authority to establish tonnage thresholds based on the convention
measurement system as an alternative to existing thresholds specified
in U.S. law that were based on the regulatory measurement system. This
authority included a mandate that any regulations used to establish
alternate tonnage thresholds be interpretive rules. While the Coast
Guard promptly issued an interpretive rule establishing an alternate
tonnage threshold bounding the upper size for OSVs (61 FR 66614 dated
December 18, 1996), little additional progress has been made on this
initiative due to its complexity, broad scope, and competing
priorities.
    Experience with cleanup of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill
generated interest, in both the public and private sectors, for
expanding spill response capability and capacity by using certificated
OSVs as OSRVs. Many of the newer OSVs that were constructed under the
alternate tonnage framework established in 1996 exceed the 500 GRT
threshold for multi-service OSRVs specified in 46 U.S.C. 3702(f)(2)(A).
Therefore, they are currently precluded from also being certificated as
OSRVs, unless they meet tank vessel standards. This rule, in effect,
removes this obstacle to OSRV certification. Safety, design and
operational standards for OSRVs may be the subject of a future
rulemaking by the U.S. Coast Guard.
    Tonnage thresholds in all tonnage-based laws of the United States
are applied to the vessel using convention measurement system tonnage
when a vessel is optionally assigned convention measurement system
tonnage only (i.e., GRT tonnage not assigned). This includes the 6000
GT ITC alternate tonnage threshold established under this rule. The
vessel's assigned regulatory measurement tonnage is used to apply these
thresholds when the option is not exercised. This includes the 500 GRT
threshold that is the subject of this rule. There are no restrictions
that would preclude the vessel owner, or a future owner, from reverting
to a previous decision in this regard.

VI. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this interpretive rule after considering numerous
statutes and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize
our analyses based on 14 of these statutes or executive orders.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review'') and
13563 (``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'') direct agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives
and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental,
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both
costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of
promoting flexibility.
    This interpretive rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
    This interpretive rule establishes a tonnage threshold of 6000 GT
ITC for OSRVs under the alternate tonnage framework, which offers a
mechanism for the Coast Guard to regulate vessels under tonnages
assigned using the convention measurement system, instead of the
regulatory measurement system. Therefore, this interpretive rule
provides an option to owners of vessels certificated as OSVs (under 46
CFR subchapter L) to seek OSRV certification based on this alternate
tonnage threshold. We believe that a vessel owner will opt to use the
alternate tonnage framework described in this interpretive rule only if
it will be beneficial to the owner's business.
    We expect this interpretive rule to be beneficial to the public and
to the maritime industry because it provides the opportunity to
increase oil spill response capacity and capability.
    This interpretive rule provides for optional and voluntary use of
an alternative approach to meet an existing requirement. Accordingly,
there is no mandatory cost to the public.

B. Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), this rule
is considered an interpretive rule and is not subject to the
requirement under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) for publication of a general notice
of proposed rulemaking. Therefore, under 5 U.S.C. 601, it is not a rule
that is subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.).
    As previously discussed in Section III (Regulatory History) of this
preamble, the Coast Guard is issuing this rule as an interpretive rule
as authorized by section 702 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of
1996 (the Act) (Pub. L. 104-324; October 19, 1996). The Conference
Report on the Act (H. Rept. 104-854) states that, because this rule is
considered to be an interpretive rule under the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.), the notice of proposed rulemaking
and comment requirements and the 30-day delay of effective date under 5
U.S.C. 553 would not be required in order to expedite this rulemaking.
    This interpretive rule provides for optional and voluntary use of
an alternative approach to owners of vessels certificated as OSVs to
seek an OSRV certification based on an alternate tonnage threshold. We
believe that a vessel owner will opt to use the alternate tonnage
framework described in this interpretive final rule only if it will be
beneficial to the owner's business. We expect this interim rule to be
beneficial to the public and to the maritime industry because it
provides the opportunity to increase the availability and capacity of
OSRVs.

C. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please consult Brian T. Ellis, U. S. Coast
Guard Marine Safety Center, Tonnage Division,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-(888) 734-3247).

D. Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

E. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them.
    We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined
that it does not have implications for federalism.

F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

G. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

H. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

I. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

J. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.

K. Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy.

L. Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

M. Environment

    We have analyzed this interpretive rule under Department of
Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant
Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have concluded that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This interpretive rule is
categorically excluded under section 2.B.2, figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(d) of the Instruction. Exclusion under paragraph (34)(d) applies
because this interpretive rule pertains to regulations concerning
documentation and admeasurement of vessels. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 126

    Cargo vessels, Marine safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
46 CFR part 126 as follows:

PART 126--INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION

0
1. The authority citation for part 126 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(j); 46 U.S.C. 3205, 3306, 3307, 3702,
14104; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; Executive Order 11735, 38 FR 21243; 3
CFR 1971-1975 Comp., p. 793; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  126.225 to read as follows:

Sec.  126.225  Alternate tonnage for offshore supply vessels seeking
oil spill response vessel certification.

    An offshore supply vessel certificated under this subchapter that
is less than 500 gross register tons (GRT) as measured under section
14502 of Title 46, United States Code, or 6,000 gross tonnage (GT ITC)
as measured under section 14302 of Title 46, United States Code when
GRT is not assigned, may also be certificated as an oil spill response
vessel.

    Dated: December 5, 2011.
J.G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2011-31708 Filed 12-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 3, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 69522-69525]
[FR Doc No: 2020-24041]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0976; Product Identifier 2020-NM-095-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2020-04-22, which applies to certain Dassault Aviation Model FALCON
2000EX airplanes. AD 2020-04-22 requires revising the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or
more restrictive airworthiness limitations. Since the FAA issued AD
2020-04-22, the FAA has determined that new or more restrictive
airworthiness limitations are necessary. This proposed AD would require
revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable,
to incorporate new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations, as
specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which
will be incorporated by reference. The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by December
18, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For EASA material that will be incorporated by reference (IBR) in
this AD, contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website
at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. For Dassault Aviation service information
identified in this proposed AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet
Corporation, Teterboro Airport, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, NJ
07606; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.dassaultfalcon.com.
You may view this IBR material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2020-0976.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0976; or in person at Docket Operations

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed
above. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2020-0976; Product Identifier
2020-NM-095-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
the proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this proposed AD.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Any
commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated
as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.

Discussion

    The FAA issued AD 2020-04-22, Amendment 39-19858 (85 FR 17487,
March 30, 2020) (``AD 2020-04-22''), for certain Dassault Aviation
Model FALCON 2000EX airplanes. AD 2020-04-22 requires revising the
existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations. The FAA
issued AD 2020-04-22 to address reduced structural integrity of the
airplane. AD 2020-04-22 specifies that accomplishing the revision
required by paragraph (g) or (i) of that AD terminates the requirements
of paragraph (g)(1) of AD 2010-26-05, Amendment 39-16544 (75 FR 79952,
December 21, 2010), for Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 2000EX
airplanes.

Actions Since AD 2020-04-22 Was Issued

    Since the FAA issued AD 2020-04-22, the FAA has determined that new
or more restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary.
    The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2020-0114, dated May 20, 2020
(``EASA AD 2020-0114'') (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for all Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 2000EX airplanes.
    Airplanes with an original airworthiness certificate or original
export certificate of airworthiness issued after February 15, 2020,
must comply with the airworthiness limitations specified as part of the
approved type design and referenced on the type certificate data sheet
for those airplanes; this AD therefore does not include these airplanes
in the applicability.
    This proposed AD was prompted by a determination that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. The FAA is
proposing this AD to address reduced structural integrity of the
airplane. See the MCAI for additional background information.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2020-0114 describes new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations for airplane structures and safe life limits.
    This proposed AD would also require Chapter 5-40, Airworthiness
Limitations, DGT 113877, Revision 12, dated November 2018, of the
Dassault Falcon 2000EX Maintenance Manual, which the Director of the
Federal Register approved for incorporation by reference as of May 4,
2020 (85 FR 17487, March 30, 2020).
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
and service information referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD
because the FAA has evaluated all pertinent information and determined
an unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would retain the requirements of AD 2020-04-22.
This proposed AD would also require revising the existing maintenance
or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations, which are specified in EASA AD
2020-0114 described previously, as incorporated by reference. Any
differences with EASA AD 2020-0114 are identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this AD.
    This proposed AD would require revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections).
Compliance with these actions is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For
airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by this proposed AD, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the actions described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request
approval for an alternative method of compliance according to paragraph
(m)(1) of this proposed AD.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA initially worked with Airbus and EASA to develop a
process to use certain EASA ADs as the primary source of information
for compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has
since coordinated with other manufacturers and civil aviation
authorities (CAAs) to use this process. As a result, EASA AD 2020-0114
will be incorporated by reference in the FAA final rule. This proposed
AD would, therefore, require compliance with EASA AD 2020-0114 in its
entirety, through that incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same as the heading of a particular
section in the EASA AD does not mean that operators need comply only
with that section. For example, where the AD requirement refers to
``all required actions and compliance times,'' compliance with this AD
requirement is not limited to the section titled ``Required Action(s)
and Compliance Time(s)'' in the EASA AD.
    Service information specified in EASA AD 2020-0114 that is required
for compliance with EASA AD 2020-0114 will be available on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2020-0976 after the FAA final rule is published.

Airworthiness Limitation ADs Using the New Process

    The FAA's process of incorporating by reference MCAI ADs as the
primary source of information for compliance with corresponding FAA ADs
has been limited to certain MCAI ADs (primarily those with service
bulletins as the primary source of information for accomplishing the
actions required by the FAA AD). However, the FAA is now expanding the
process to include MCAI ADs that require a change to airworthiness
limitation documents, such as airworthiness limitation sections.
    For these ADs that incorporate by reference an MCAI AD that changes
airworthiness limitations, the FAA requirements are unchanged.
Operators must revise the existing maintenance or inspection program,
as applicable, to incorporate the information specified in the new
airworthiness limitation document. The airworthiness limitations must
be followed according to 14 CFR 91.403(c) and 91.409(e).
    The previous format of the airworthiness limitation ADs included a
paragraph that specified that no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections) or intervals may be used unless the actions or intervals
are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in
accordance with the procedures specified in the AMOCs paragraph under
``Other FAA Provisions.'' This new format includes a ``New Provisions
for Alternative Actions and Intervals'' paragraph that does not
specifically refer to AMOCs, but operators may still request an AMOC to
use an alternative action or interval.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 17 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:
    The FAA estimates the total cost per operator for the retained
actions from AD 2020-04-22 to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-
hour).
    The FAA has determined that revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator,
although the agency recognizes that this number may vary from operator
to operator. In the past, the agency has estimated that this action
takes 1 work-hour per airplane. Since operators incorporate maintenance
or inspection program changes for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has
determined that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-
airplane estimate.
    The FAA estimates the total cost per operator for the new revision
to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2020-04-22, Amendment 39-19858
(85 FR 17487, March 30, 2020), and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:

Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA-2020-0976; Product Identifier
2020-NM-095-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments by December 18, 2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    (1) This AD replaces AD 2020-04-22, Amendment 39-19858 (85 FR
17489, March 20, 2020) (``AD 2020-04-22'').
    (2) This AD affects AD 2010-26-05, Amendment 39-16544 (75 FR
79952, December 21, 2010) (``AD 2010-26-05'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 2000EX
airplanes, certificated in any category, with an original
airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of
airworthiness issued on or before February 15, 2020.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Time Limits/
Maintenance Checks.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a determination that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision, With No
Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD
2020-04-22, with no changes. For airplanes an original airworthiness
certificate or original export certificate of airworthiness issued
on or before January 15, 2019: Within 90 days after May 4, 2020 (the
effective date of AD 2020-04-22), revise the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate the information
specified in Chapter 5-40, Airworthiness Limitations, DGT 113877,
Revision 12, dated November 2018, of the Dassault Falcon 2000EX
Maintenance Manual. The initial compliance times for doing the tasks
are at the time specified in Chapter 5-40, Airworthiness
Limitations, DGT 113877, Revision 12, dated November 2018, of the
Dassault Falcon 2000EX Maintenance Manual, or within 90 days after
May 4, 2020, whichever occurs later; except for task number 52-20-
00-610-801-01, the initial compliance time is within 24 months after
October 8, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2014-16-12, Amendment 39-
17936 (79 FR 52187, September 3, 2014)). The term ``LDG'' in the
``First Inspection'' column of any table in the service information
specified in this paragraph means total airplane landings. The term
``FH'' in the ``First Inspection'' column of any table in the
service information specified in this paragraph means total flight
hours. The term ``FC'' in the ``First Inspection'' column of any
table in the service information specified in this paragraph means
total flight cycles. Accomplishing the maintenance or inspection
program revision required by paragraph (i) of this AD terminates the
requirements of this paragraph.

(h) Retained Provision: No Alternative Actions or Intervals, With a New
Exception

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (j) of AD
2020-04-22, with a new exception. Except as required by paragraph
(k) of this AD, after the existing maintenance or inspection program
has been revised as required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no
alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be used
unless the actions or intervals are approved as an AMOC in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (m)(1) of this
AD.

(i) New Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision

    Except as specified in paragraph (j) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2020-0114, dated May 20, 2020 (``EASA AD 2020-0114''). Accomplishing
the maintenance or inspection program revision required by this
paragraph terminates the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.

(j) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020-0114

    (1) The requirements specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of EASA
AD 2020-0114 do not apply to this AD.
    (2) Paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2020-0114 specifies revising ``the
approved AMP'' within 12 months after its effective date, but this
AD requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program,
as applicable, to incorporate the ``limitations, tasks and
associated thresholds and intervals'' specified in paragraph (3) of
EASA AD 2020-0114 within 90 days after the effective date of this
AD.
    (3) The initial compliance time for doing the tasks specified in
paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2020-0114 is at the applicable ``associated
thresholds'' specified in paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2020-0114, or
within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later.
    (4) The provisions specified in paragraphs (4) and (5) of EASA
AD 2020-0114 do not apply to this AD.
    (5) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2020-0114 does not apply
to this AD.

(k) New Provisions for Alternative Actions and Intervals

    After the maintenance or inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (i) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections), and intervals are allowed unless they are approved as
specified in the provisions of the ``Ref. Publications'' section of
EASA AD 2020-0114.

(l) Terminating Action for Certain Actions in AD 2010-26-05

    Accomplishing the actions required by paragraph (g) or (i) of
this AD terminates the requirements of paragraph (g)(1) of AD 2010-
26-05, for Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 2000EX airplanes only.

(m) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (n)(4) of this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Dassault
Aviation's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(n) Related Information

    (1) For information about EASA AD 2020-0114, contact the EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet www.easa.europa.eu. You
may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (2) For Dassault service information identified in this AD,
contact Dassault Falcon Jet Corporation, Teterboro Airport, P.O. Box
2000, South Hackensack, NJ 07606; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet:
https://www.dassaultfalcon.com.
    (3) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. This material may be found in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0976.
    (4) For more information about this AD, contact Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Issued on October 26, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-24041 Filed 11-2-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P