           United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX

                                 Air Division

                          Technical Support Document

                                      for

                      EPA's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

                                    for the

                     California State Implementation Plan

           San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

                            Rule 4103, Open Burning

                            Prepared by Al Petersen

                          Approved by Andrew Steckel

                                 May 28, 2009

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD)

Submitted Rule
* SJVUAPCD Rule 4103, Open Burning (amended on May 17, 2007, submitted on April 6, 2009, submittal determined complete on May 13, 2009).

There are no other submitted versions on which EPA has not acted.

Applicable SIP Rule
* SJVUAPCD Rule 4103, Open Burning (originally adopted on June 18, 1992, SIP rule amended on May 19, 2005, submitted on October 20, 2005, approved on April 11, 2006, 71 FR 18216).

Purpose of Rule Amendments
The purpose of the SJVUAPCD Rule 4103 amendments are as follows:
* 4103.3.0: Definitions have been added or revised to improve the clarity of the rule.
* 4<IP_ADDRESS>.3: This section is added to allow the issuance of burn permits for up to 50% per year of the rice stubble planted in the years between June 1, 2010, and June 1, 2015, excluding the amount of material that may be burned pursuant to <IP_ADDRESS>.
* 4<IP_ADDRESS>.4: This section is added to allow the issuance of burn permits for burning until June 1, 2015, of residual rice stubble, spot burning of rice stubble, and burning of weeds and vegetative materials on rice field levees and banks.
* 4<IP_ADDRESS>: This section is added to prohibit burning beginning June 1, 2007, of orchard removal materials from all crops, except for orchard removal from citrus, apples, pears, quince, figs, and orchard removal from a total of 20 acres or less per single location.
* 4103. <IP_ADDRESS>: This section is added to prohibit burning beginning June 1, 2010, of orchard removal matter from citrus, apples, pears, quince, and figs.
* 4103. <IP_ADDRESS>: This section is added to prohibit burning beginning June 1, 2010, of orchard removal matter from a total of 20 acres or less per single location.  This provision does not apply if more than 20 acres are removed in a single year.
* 4103.5.8: This section on burning of tumbleweeds is revised to clarify how the District historically implemented this provision.

Rule Evaluation
Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the CAA) and must not relax existing requirements (see sections 110(l) and 193).  Section 189(b) of the CAA requires serious nonattainment areas with significant PM-10 sources to adopt best available control measures (BACM), including best available control technology (BACT).  BACM/BACT is not required for source categories that are not significant.  See Addendum to the General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, 59 FR 41998 (August 16, 1994).  There are no specific BACM/BACT or RACM/RACT requirements for attainment areas (not including maintenance attainment areas).  San Joaquin Valley was formerly a serious PM-10 nonattainment area that has achieved attainment ahead of schedule on November 12, 2008 (73 FR 66759).  San Joaquin Valley is therefore a maintenance attainment area for PM-10.  SJVUAPCD continues to fulfill the requirements of BACM/BACT for Rule 4103 in order to prevent returning to PM-10 nonattainment.

SIP Rules must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for each category of volatile organic compound (VOC) sources covered by a control technique guideline (CTG) document as well as each major VOC source in nonattainment areas (see section 182(a)(2).  RACT requirements are extended to oxides of nitrogen (NOX) (see section 182(f)).  Other existing sources in the area must also fulfill RACT (see section 172(c)).  The SJVUAPCD regulates an 8-hr extreme ozone nonattainment area (see 40 CFR part 81) and must fulfill the requirements of RACT with respect to VOC and NOX.

The District intends by revision of this rule to satisfy the State requirements in California Health and Safety Code (H&SC) 41855.5 and 43855.6.  These requirements are for the prohibition of burning of certain categories of orchard agricultural waste commencing on certain specified dates, with an allowance under certain conditions for the postponement of prohibition to future dates.  In addition, the revisions of this rule implement Phase III of the open burning control measure listed in the District's 2007 Ozone Plan.  See guidance document 5.

The amendments to SJVUAPCD Rule 4103 Section 5.5 incorporate the burn prohibitions required in H&SC 43855.5.  H&SC 43855.6 allows postponement of the burn prohibition deadlines if all of the following criteria are met:
(a) The district determines that there is no economically feasible alternative means of eliminating the waste.
(b) The district determines that there is no long-term federal or state funding commitment for the continued operation of biomass facilities in the San Joaquin Valley or development of alternatives to burning.
(c) The district determines that the continued issuance of permits for that specific category or crop will not cause, or substantially contribute to, a violation of an applicable federal ambient air quality standard.
(d) The state board concurs with the district's determinations pursuant to this section.

The SJVUAPCD is exercising the authority in H&SC 43855.6 to allow the issuance of burn permits until June 1, 2010, for orchard removal matter from citrus, apples, pears, quince, and fig crops, and from a total of 20 acres or less at a single location.  The District is also incorporating a phased schedule until June 1, 2015, for the burn prohibition for rice stubble.  The District has determined that, for these categories, there is no feasible alternative that would allow the District to completely prohibit burning at this time, and has made a demonstration that the criteria of H&SC 43855.6 have been met.

BACM/BACT Demonstration for Rule 4103
The SIP Rule 4103 was approved as a BACM/BACT rule on April 11, 2006 (71 FR 18216).  We believe that the revised SJVUAPCD Rule 4103 continues to fulfill the requirements of BACM/BACT.  The rule is generally more stringent than similar rules in other Districts (South Coast AQMD Rule 444, Maricopa County AQD Rule 314, Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Rule 417, and Great Basin APCD Rule 406).  The prohibition revisions added in this action are not present in any of the other District rules cited.  An analysis of the feasibility of the implementation of the prohibitions is included in the SJVUAPCD Staff Report submitted with Rule 4103.  See docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0272.  The revised rule fulfills the requirements of BACM/BACT.

RACT Demonstration for Rule 4103
On April 16, 2009, SJVUAPCD adopted its "RACT Demonstration for Ozone SIP," which provides the District's demonstration that RACT is implemented for all appropriate rules.  See guidance document 6.

In summary, SJVUAPCD found the following for Rule 4103:
* There is no national guidance (CTG or ACT) or regulation (NSPS, NESHAP, or MACT) to help define RACT for this category.
* Similar requirements are imposed in other large California nonattainment areas.

We concur with SJVUAPCD's finding that Rule 4103 implements RACT for reasons including:
* The lack of relevant national guidance or regulation suggests that EPA believes state/local regulations for the activity are generally appropriate.
* SJVUAPCD, SCAQMD, and the other large California nonattainment agencies generally have among the most stringent stationary source requirements nationwide, and we are not aware of other reasonably available technological or operational controls likely to significantly reduce emissions from this activity.

Guidance Documents
The following guidance documents were used in the evaluation of Rule 4103:
   1. Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of Implementation Plans, U.S. EPA, 40 CFR part 51.
   2. Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations, EPA (May 25, 1988).  [The Bluebook]
   3. Addendum to the General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, 59 FR 41998 (August 16, 1994).
   4. PM-10 Guideline Document (EPA-452/R-93-008).
   5. 2007 Ozone Plan, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (April 30, 2007). http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/2007sip/sjv8hr/sjvozone.htm
   6. RACT Demonstration for Ozone SIP, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (April 16, 2009). http://www.valleyair.org/Workshops/public_workshops_idx.htm#8hrOzoneRactSIP%2004-16-10

Recommended Action
The submitted Rule 4103 is enforceable, fulfills the requirements of BACM/BACT, fulfills the requirements of RACT, and improves the SIP.  EPA staff recommends full approval under section 110(k) of the CAA of the following rule for incorporation into the California SIP to replace the existing SIP rule cited above:
* SJVUAPCD Rule 4103, Open Burning (amended on May 17, 2007, submitted on April 6, 2009).

Attachments
1. Submitted SJVUAPCD Rule 4103.
2. SIP-Approved SJVUAPCD Rule 4103.
3. SJVUAPCD RACT SIP Demonstration for Rule 4103.


[Federal Register: September 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 170)]
[Notices]
[Page 53998-53999]
[DOCID:fr02se10-98]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62787; File No. SR-FINRA-2010-045]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Security Futures Risk Disclosure
Statement

August 27, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 16, 2010, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC''
or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
and II, which Items have been prepared by FINRA. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    FINRA is proposing a supplement to the security futures risk
disclosure statement to accommodate proposed changes by OneChicago, LLC
to list a class of security futures for which adjustments will be made
for ordinary dividends.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on FINRA's Web
site at http://www.finra.org, at the principal office of FINRA and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    In 2002, FINRA developed sales practice rules governing security
futures.\3\ Among those rules' requirements is the obligation of every
member to deliver the current security futures risk disclosure
statement (``Statement'') to each customer at or prior to the time such
customer's account is approved for trading security futures.\4\ The
current Statement was approved by the SEC in 2002.\5\ FINRA is
proposing a supplement to the Statement to accommodate proposed changes
by OneChicago, LLC to list a class of security futures for which
adjustments will be made for ordinary dividends. The proposed
supplement is intended to be read in conjunction with the Statement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46663 (October 15,
2002), 67 FR 64944 (October 22, 2002) (Order Approving File No. SR-
NASD-2002-040).
    \4\ FINRA Rule 2370(b)(11).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46612 (October 7,
2002), 67 FR 64151 (October 17, 2002) (Notice of Filing and Summary
Effectiveness of File No. SR-NASD-2002-128).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA will announce the implementation date of the proposed rule
change in a Regulatory Notice to be published no later than 60 days
following Commission notice of the filing of the rule change for
immediate effectiveness. The implementation date will be no later than
90 days after the date of the filing.
2. Statutory Basis
    FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\6\ which requires, among
other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. FINRA believes that the proposed rule change, which
will be provided to customers, will help to accurately inform customers
of the characteristics and risks of security futures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
FINRA has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-FINRA-2010-045 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2010-045. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use

only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the
Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of FINRA. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2010-045 and should be submitted
on or before September 23, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2010-21934 Filed 9-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 71 (Friday, April 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21946-21948]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08690]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9801-7]

Request for Nominations of Candidates to the EPA's Clean Air
Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) and EPA's Science Advisory Board
(SAB)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) invites
nominations of scientific experts from a diverse range of disciplines
to be considered for appointment to the Clean Air Scientific Advisory
Committee (CASAC), the Science Advisory Board (SAB) and six SAB
committees described in this notice. Appointments are anticipated to be
filled by the start of Fiscal Year 2014 (October 2013).

DATES: Nominations should be submitted in time to arrive no later than
May 13, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nominators unable to submit
nominations electronically as described below may submit a paper copy
to the Designated Federal Officers for the committees, as identified
below. General inquiries regarding the work of the CASAC and SAB or SAB
committees may also be directed to the designated DFOs.
    Background: Established by statute, the CASAC (42 U.S.C. 7409) and
SAB (42 U.S.C. 4365) are chartered Federal Advisory Committees that
provide independent scientific and technical peer review, consultation,
advice and recommendations directly to the EPA Administrator on the
scientific bases for EPA's actions and programs. Members of the CASAC
and the SAB constitute distinguished bodies of non-EPA scientists,
engineers, economists, and behavioral and social scientists who are
nationally and internationally recognized experts in their respective
fields. Members are appointed by the EPA Administrator for a three-year
term.
    Expertise Sought for CASAC: Established in 1977 under the Clean Air
Act (CAA) Amendments, the chartered CASAC reviews and offers scientific
advice to the EPA Administrator on technical aspects of national
ambient air quality standards for criteria pollutants (ozone;
particulate matter; carbon monoxide; nitrogen oxides; sulfur dioxide;
and lead). As required under the CAA section 109(d), CASAC is composed
of seven members, with at least one member of the National Academy of
Sciences, one physician, and one person representing state air
pollution control agencies. The SAB Staff Office is seeking nominations
of experts to serve on the CASAC who represent state air pollution
control agencies and who have demonstrated experience in the following
science related to the environment: Health sciences; medicine; public
health; atmospheric sciences; modeling; and/or risk assessment. The SAB
Staff Office is especially interested in scientists with expertise
described above who have knowledge and experience in air quality
relating to criteria pollutants. For further information about the
CASAC membership appointment process and schedule, please contact Dr.
Holly Stallworth, DFO, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Expertise Sought for the SAB: The SAB was established in 1978 by
the Environmental Research, Development and Demonstration Authorization
Act to provide independent advice to the Administrator on general
scientific and technical matters underlying the agency's policies and
actions. The chartered SAB provides strategic advice to the EPA
Administrator on a variety of EPA science and research programs. All
the work of SAB committees and panels is under the direction of the
chartered SAB. The chartered SAB reviews all SAB committee and panel
draft reports and determines whether they are appropriate to send to
the EPA Administrator.
    The SAB Staff Office is seeking nominations of experts to serve on
the chartered SAB in the following disciplines as they relate to the
human health and the environment: Ecological sciences and ecological
assessment; economics; engineering; geochemistry, health disparities;
health sciences; medicine; microbiology; modeling; pediatrics; public
health; risk assessment; social, behavioral and decision sciences; and
statistics. The SAB Staff Office is especially interested in scientists
with expertise described above who have knowledge and experience in air
quality; climate change; energy and the environment; water quality;
water quantity; water re-use; ecosystem services; community
environmental health; sustainability; chemical safety; green chemistry;
human health risk assessment; homeland security; and waste management.
For further information about the SAB membership appointment process
and schedule, please contact Dr. Angela Nugent, DFO, by telephone at
202-564-2218 or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    The SAB Staff Office is also seeking nominations for experts for
six SAB committees: The Chemical Assessment Advisory Committee; the
Drinking Water Committee; the Ecological Processes and Effects
Committee; the Environmental Economics Advisory Committee; the
Environmental Engineering Committee; and the Radiation Advisory
Committee.
    (1) The SAB Chemical Assessment Advisory Committee (CAAC) provides
advice through the chartered SAB regarding selected toxicological
reviews of environmental chemicals available on EPA's Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS). The SAB Staff Office is seeking nominations
of experts with experience in chemical assessments. Members should have
expertise in one or more of the following disciplines: Public health;
epidemiology; toxicology; modeling; biostatistics; risk assessment; and
health disparities. For further information about the CAAC membership
appointment process and schedule, please contact Dr. Suhair Shallal,
DFO, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) The SAB Drinking Water Committee (DWC) provides advice on the
scientific and technical aspects of EPA's national drinking water
program. The SAB Staff Office is seeking nominations of experts with
experience in drinking water issues. Members should have expertise in
one or more of the following disciplines: Epidemiology; infectious
disease; microbiology; and public health. For further information about
the DWC membership appointment process and schedule, please contact Mr.
Thomas Carpenter, DFO, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (3) The SAB Ecological Processes and Effects Committee (EPEC)
provides advice on science and research to assess, protect and restore
the health of ecosystems. The SAB Staff Office is seeking nominations
of experts with demonstrated expertise in the following disciplines:
Landscape ecology; terrestrial ecology; systems ecology; and ecological
risk assessment. For further information about the EPEC membership
appointment process and schedule, please contact Dr. Thomas Armitage,
DFO, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (4) The SAB Environmental Economics Advisory Committee (EEAC)
provides advice on methods and analyses related to economics, costs,
and benefits of EPA environmental programs. The SAB Staff Office is
seeking nominations of experts in environmental economics to serve on
the EEAC. For further information about the EEAC membership appointment
process and schedule, please contact Dr. Holly Stallworth, DFO, by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (5) The SAB Environmental Engineering Committee (EEC) provides
advice on risk management technologies to control and prevent
pollution. The SAB Staff Office is seeking nominations of experts in
geochemistry; hazardous and solid waste management; and wastewater
treatment to serve on the EEC. For further information about the EEC
membership appointment process and schedule, please contact Mr. Edward
Hanlon, DFO, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (6) The Radiation Advisory Committee (RAC) provides advice on
radiation protection, radiation science, and radiation risk assessment.
The SAB

Staff Office is seeking nominations of experts to serve on the RAC with
demonstrated expertise in the following disciplines: Radiation
epidemiology; risk assessment as related to cancer risks from exposures
to environmental radiation; and biostatistics. For further information
about the RAC membership appointment process and schedule, please
contact Mr. Edward Hanlon, DFO, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Selection Criteria for the CASAC, SAB and six SAB Committees
includes:

--Demonstrated scientific credentials and disciplinary expertise in
relevant fields;
--Willingness to commit time to the committee and demonstrated ability
to work constructively and effectively on committees;
--Background and experiences that would help members contribute to the
diversity of perspectives on the committee, e.g., geographic, economic,
social, cultural, educational backgrounds, professional affiliations;
and other considerations; and
--For the committee as a whole, consideration of the collective breadth
and depth of scientific expertise; and a balance of scientific
perspectives.

    As these committees undertake specific advisory activities, the SAB
Staff Office will consider two additional criteria for each new
activity: absence of financial conflicts of interest and absence of an
appearance of a loss of impartiality.
    How To Submit Nominations: Any interested person or organization
may nominate qualified persons to be considered for appointment to
these advisory committees. Individuals may self-nominate. Nominations
should be submitted in electronic format (preferred) following the
instructions for ``Nominating Experts for Annual Membership'' provided
on the SAB Web site. The form can be accessed through the ``Nomination
of Experts'' link on the blue navigational bar on the SAB Web site at
http://www.epa.gov/sab. To be considered, all nominations should
include the information requested. EPA values and welcomes diversity.
In an effort to obtain nominations of diverse candidates, EPA
encourages nominations of women and men of all racial and ethnic
groups.
    Nominators are asked to identify the specific committee for which
nominees are to be considered. The following information should be
provided on the nomination form: Contact information for the person
making the nomination; contact information for the nominee; the
disciplinary and specific areas of expertise of the nominee; the
nominee's curriculum vitae; and a biographical sketch of the nominee
indicating current position, educational background; research
activities; sources of research funding for the last two years; and
recent service on other national advisory committees or national
professional organizations. To help the agency evaluate the
effectiveness of its outreach efforts, please indicate how you learned
of this nomination opportunity. Persons having questions about the
nomination process or the public comment process described below, or
who are unable to submit nominations through the SAB Web site, should
contact the Designated Federal Officer for the committee, as identified
above. The DFO will acknowledge receipt of nominations and in that
acknowledgement will invite the nominee to provide any additional
information that the nominee feels would be useful in considering the
nomination, such as availability to participate as a member of the
committee; how the nominee's background, skills and experience would
contribute to the diversity of the committee; and any questions the
nominee has regarding membership. The names and biosketches of
qualified nominees identified by respondents to this Federal Register
notice, and additional experts identified by the SAB Staff, will be
posted in a List of Candidates on the SAB Web site at http://www.epa.gov/sab. Public comments on this List of Candidates will be
accepted for 21 days from the date the list is posted. The public will
be requested to provide relevant information or other documentation on
nominees that the SAB Staff Office should consider in evaluating
candidates.
    Candidates invited to serve will be asked to submit the
``Confidential Financial Disclosure Form for Special Government
Employees Serving on Federal Advisory Committees at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency'' (EPA Form 3110-48). This confidential
form allows EPA to determine whether there is a statutory conflict
between that person's public responsibilities as a Special Government
Employee and private interests and activities, or the appearance of a
loss of impartiality, as defined by Federal regulation. The form may be
viewed and downloaded through the ``Ethics Requirements for Advisors''
link on the blue navigational bar on the SAB Web site at http://www.epa.gov/sab.

    Dated: April 4, 2013.
Thomas H. Brennan,
Deputy Director, EPA Science Advisory Board Staff Office.
[FR Doc. 2013-08690 Filed 4-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Supporting Statement

for

Marine Transportation System Recovery (MTSR) Essential Elements of
Information and Facility Status

OMB No.:  1625-new

COLLECTION INSTRUMENTS:  Instruction, CG-11410 and CG-11410A

A.  Justification

1.  Circumstances that make the collection of information necessary.

33 U.S.C. §1225, 46 U.S.C. §70103, and 50 U.S.C. §191 require the
Coast Guard to take action to prevent damage to, or the destruction of,
bridges, other structures, on or in navigable waters or shore area
adjacent; to minimize damage from and respond to a transportation
security incident; and to safeguard against destruction of vessels,
harbors, ports and waterfront facilities in the United States and all
territorial waters during a national emergency.  To be prepared to
execute these missions, U.S. Coast Guard policy requires Sector
Commanders to develop Essential Elements of Information regarding the
Marine Transportation System (MTS) within their Captain of the Port
Zones.  This form is used to capture data on facilities, vessels, and
shared transportation i9nfrastructure prior to a port disruption to be
able to characterize the port in its normal fully functioning condition.
 Following a port disruption, the U.S. Coast Guard intends to gather
information on the status of the MTS using the MTSR Facility Status
sheet to compare the pre-disruption condition to the post-disruption
condition.

2.  Purpose of the information collection.

This information may be sent in electronically or mailed to the U.S.
Coast Guard Marine Transportation System Recovery Unit (MTSRU) to
establish the normal fully functioning condition of a port prior to a
port condition to the disrupted port condition, enabling the MTSRU to
assist in prioritizing recovery efforts, and gauge the effectiveness of
the response.  Gathering essential elements of information before a port
disruption enables the U.S. Coast Guard to establish a normal port
condition baseline.  Then, following a port disruption, the port’s
condition can be measured against the normal baseline to provide
critical input to those federal, state, and local response organizations
that are engaging in restoring the port to its pre-disruption condition.

3.  Consideration of the use of improved technology.

CG-11410 and CG-11410A may involve the use of email, fax, direct
uploading to a website or other courier service.  If approved, the
industry may use any of these means to pass information to the MTSRU.

4.  Efforts to identify duplication.

This information is not normally available requiring a form requesting
the information.

5.  Methods to minimize the burden to small businesses if involved.

This information collection does not have an impact on small businesses
or other small entities.

6.  Consequences to the Federal program if collection were not done or
conducted less frequently.

Without accurate baseline data, following a port disruption the U.S.
Coast Guard would not be able to provide the best recommendations for
prioritizing recovery efforts or gauging the effectiveness of federal,
state, local, and contracted response efforts.

7.  Special collection circumstances.

This information collection is conducted in a manner consistent with the
guidelines in 5 CFR 1320(d)(2).

8.  Consultation.

A 60-day Notice will be published in the Federal Register to obtain
public comment on this collection.

9.  Provide any payment or gift to respondents.

The U.S. Coast Guard does not provide payment or gifts to respondents in
exchange for a benefit sought.

10.  Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents.

There are no assurances of confidentiality provided to the respondents
for this information collection.

11.  Additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature.

There are no questions of sensitive language.

12.  Estimates of annual hour and cost burdens to respondents.

The estimated annual number of respondents is 6,000.

The estimated annual number of responses is 6,000.

The estimated annual hour burden is 2,250 hours.

The estimated annual cost burden is $45,000.

The manager of the facility or vessel could answer these questions
without resorting to an internal records search.  There is no annual
collection of data.  The MTSR Essential Elements of Information (EEI) is
collected from the approximately 3,000 respondents one time.  The MTSR
Facility Status information is only used following a significant port
disruption.  Significant port disruptions do not occur every year so the
3,000 respondents is a gross estimate over time.  The last significant
disruption occurred in 2012 following Hurricane Sandy.  It is estimated
that less than 200 facility Status sheets would have been filled out
following that event.  Since 2012, no significant disruptions have
occurred requiring the use of the Facility Status sheet.  It is
estimated that over the 10 year life of this form, less than 3,000
Facility Status sheets will be completed.

Type of Respondent	Form Name /

Form Number	No. of Respondents	No. of Responses per Respondent	Total
Annual No. of Responses	Avg. Burden per Response (in hours)	Total Annual
Burden (in hours)	Avg. Hourly Wage Rate	Total Annual Respondent Cost

Maritime Industry	CG-11410	3000	1

3000	.5	1500	20

$30,000

Maritime Industry	CG-11410.A	3000	1

3000	.25	750

20

$15,000

Total

6000

2250

$45,000

13.  Estimates of annualized capital and start-up costs.

There are no recordkeeping, capital, start-up or maintenance costs
associated with this information collection.

14.  Estimates of annualized Federal Government costs.

The estimated one-time Federal Government cost is $135,000.  We estimate
that it will take .75 hour by a GS-12 to review and process each
submission.  The wage rate for a GS-12 is $29 to $38 per hour according
to GSA wage schedules.

	Hours	Wage Rate	One-time Cost

6000	.75	4500	$30	$135,000

15.  Explain the reasons for change in burden.

This is a new collection.

16.  Plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.

This information collection will not be published for statistical
purposes.

17.  Approval for not explaining the expiration date for OMB approval.

The Coast Guard will display the expiration date for OMB approval of
this information collection.

18.  Exception to the certification statement.

The Coast Guard does not request an exception to the certification of
this information collection.

B.  Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods

This collection does not employ statistical methods.

1625-new

  PAGE  1  of 3

Please explain what “Hours in Cart”  means.


Questions for Magnetic Tape Residual Risk 1. Are the facilities on the list part of the magnetic tape source category?

2. Are the magnetic tape facilities still operating?

3. Are there title V permits or permit applications available for these facilities?

4. For each facility, can you provide information specific to magnetic tape operations on emission rate, stack height, stack diameter, stack gas temperature, stack gas velocity, plant location, emission point locations, and control techniques?

5. What proportion of the emissions can be attributed to magnetic tape operations? Can you provide this information for each pollutant?

6. How do the emissions for each facility break out relative to fugitive and stack?

7. Has any modeling been done for these facilities? Are there health risk assessments available for these facilities? Can you break out just the magnetic tape operations?


Project No.: 0<IP_ADDRESS>7 Page    1	 of     1

Project Name: 2011 Prelim Cat Rev CBI? 	Yes 	No                              TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 	Incoming 	Outgoing Date: 05/5/11 Time: 1:00 	am 	pm

Company Name: Clean Harbors Baton Rouge ERG Staff Name: Kimberly Landick Contact Name: Billy Clark Contact Phone Number: (225) 778-3570 General Subject: 2009 DMR Hexachlorobenzene Discharges

                       TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On May 5, 2011 at 1pm I called Clean Harbors Baton Rouge and left a message for Billy Clark requesting confirmation on their 2009 DMR hexachlorobenzene discharges. He had confirmed the benzidine discharges in March 2011 and stated that there was a missing BDL indicator in those values. He also stated that the December 2009 values were higher than normal due to dilution factors. At 4:47pm, Mr. Clark returned my call and left a message.

On May 9, 2011 at 10:50am, Mr. Clark returned my call and left a message. At 11:42am, I returned Mr. Clark's call and left a message.

On May 12, 2011 at 2:50pm, I called Mr. Clark and left a message. At 4:00pm Mr. Clark returned my call. He stated that the hexachlorobenzene discharge in Dec 2009 was due to a dilution factor in the lab, similar to the benzidine discharges confirmed in March 2011. He stated that their lab had a dilution factor issue which forced the reporting limits up 40 times their normal values. Hexachlorobenzene discharges came back non detect but because the reporting limit increased (to 400 ppb), they weren't sure whether the discharges were 399 ppb or 0 ppb. Therefore they reported the reporting limit to the state and included an explanation of the high value in their cover letter.  Mr. Clark stated that hexachlorobenzene has always been non detect in this waste stream, this one-time increase was due to a laboratory error. I thanked Mr. Clark for his time and told him I'd call back with any further questions.


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58315-58318]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23712]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0716; Product Identifier 2019-NM-168-AD; Amendment
39-19764; AD 2019-20-11]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; ATR-GIE Avions de Transport
R[eacute]gional Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional Model ATR72 airplanes. This
AD was prompted by reports of incorrectly installed main landing gear
(MLG) bushings. This AD requires a one-time general visual inspection
of the bushing installation on the left-hand and right-hand MLG, and
replacement of incorrectly installed bushings, as specified in a
European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is incorporated
by reference. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective November 15, 2019.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publications listed in this AD as of November
15, 2019.
    The FAA must receive comments on this AD by December 16, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For the material incorporated by reference (IBR) in this AD,
contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 89990 1000; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA
website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this IBR material at
the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available in the AD docket on the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2019-0716.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0716; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2019-0236, dated September 23, 2019
(``EASA AD 2019-0236'') (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for all ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional Model
ATR72 airplanes.
    This AD was prompted by reports of incorrectly installed MLG
bushings. The FAA is issuing this AD to address MLG bushings installed
in the inverted position, which could lead to MLG structural failure
and subsequent collapse of the MLG, possibly resulting in damage to the
airplane and injury to occupants. See the MCAI for additional
background information.

Related IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2019-0236 describes procedures for a one-time general
visual inspection of the bushing installation on the left-hand and
right-hand MLG, and replacement of incorrectly installed bushings. This
material is reasonably available because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to a bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, the FAA
has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA is issuing this AD because the agency
evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Requirements of This AD

    This AD requires accomplishing the actions specified in EASA AD
2019-0236 described previously, as incorporated by reference, except
for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of
this AD. This AD also requires sending the inspection results to ATR.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA initially worked with Airbus and EASA to develop a
process to use certain EASA ADs as the primary source of information
for compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has
since coordinated with other manufacturers and civil aviation
authorities (CAAs) to use this process. As a result, EASA AD 2019-0236
will be incorporated by reference in the FAA final rule. This AD,
therefore, requires compliance with EASA AD 2019-0236 in its entirety,
through that incorporation, except for any differences identified as
exceptions in the regulatory text of this AD. Using common terms that
are the same as the heading of a particular section in the EASA AD does
not mean that operators need comply only with that section. For
example, where the AD requirement refers to ``all required actions and
compliance times,'' compliance with this AD requirement is not limited
to the section titled ``Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s)'' in
the EASA AD. Service information specified in EASA AD 2019-0236 that is
required for compliance with EASA AD 2019-0236 will be available on the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2019-0716 after the FAA final rule is published.

FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD without providing an opportunity for public comments prior to
adoption. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public
justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule
because MLG bushings installed in the inverted position could lead to
MLG structural failure and subsequent collapse of the MLG, possibly
resulting in damage to the airplane and injury to occupants. Therefore,
the FAA finds good cause that notice and opportunity for prior public
comment are impracticable. In addition, for the reasons stated above,
the FAA finds that good cause exists for making this amendment
effective in less than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and the FAA did not precede it by notice and opportunity for
public comment. The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data,
views, or arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2019-0716;
Product Identifier 2019-NM-168-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The FAA specifically invites comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. The FAA will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
AD based on those comments.
    The FAA will post all comments received, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this AD.

Interim Action

    The FAA considers this AD interim action. The manufacturer is
currently developing a modification to address the unsafe condition
identified in this AD. Once this modification is developed, approved,
and available, the FAA might consider additional rulemaking.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) do not
apply when an agency finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt
a rule without prior notice and comment. Because the FAA has determined
that it has good cause to adopt this rule without notice

and comment, RFA analysis is not required.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 19 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                     Estimated Costs for Required Actions *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on  U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85.............................              $0              $85           $1,615
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Table does not include estimated costs for reporting the inspection results.

    The FAA estimates that it takes about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the reporting requirement in this AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per hour. Based on these figures, the FAA estimates the
cost of reporting the inspection results on U.S. operators to be
$1,615, or $85 per product.
    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition actions that would be required based on the results of any
required actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these on-condition actions:

                 Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Cost per
              Labor cost                   Parts cost        product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
27 work-hours x $85 per hour = $2,295.         $14,982          $17,277
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paperwork Reduction Act

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information required by this AD is 2120-
0056. The paperwork cost associated with this AD has been detailed in
the Costs of Compliance section of this document and includes time for
reviewing instructions, as well as completing and reviewing the
collection of information. Therefore, all reporting associated with
this AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden
and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the
Information Collection Clearance Officer, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Parkway,
Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866, and
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2019-20-11 ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional: Amendment
39-19764; Docket No. FAA-2019-0716; Product Identifier 2019-NM-168-
AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective November 15, 2019.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional
Model ATR72-101, -102, -201, -202, -211, -212, and -212A airplanes,
all manufacturer serial numbers, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Landing
gear.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of incorrectly installed main
landing gear (MLG) bushings. The FAA is issuing this AD to address
MLG bushings installed in the inverted position, which could lead to
MLG structural failure and subsequent collapse of the MLG, possibly
resulting in damage to the airplane and injury to occupants.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2019-0236, dated September 23, 2019 (``EASA AD 2019-0236'').

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2019-0236

    (1) For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements
of this AD: Where EASA AD 2019-0236 refers to its effective date,
this AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2019-0236 does not apply
to this AD.
    (3) Paragraph (6) of EASA AD 2019-0236 specifies to report
inspection results to ATR within a certain compliance time. For this
AD, report inspection results at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (h)(3)(i) or (ii) of this AD.
    (i) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
    (ii) If the inspection was done before the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD.

(i) No Requirement for Return of Parts

    Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2019-0236
specifies to return parts to the manufacturer, this AD does not
include that requirement.

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA; or ATR-GIE Avions
de Transport R[eacute]gional's EASA Design Organization Approval
(DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-
authorized signature.
    (3) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement: A federal agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond
to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 1
hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of information. All
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing
the burden should be directed to the Information Collection
Clearance Officer, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177-1524.

(k) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Shahram Daneshmandi,
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2019-0236,
dated September 23, 2019.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For information about EASA AD 2019-0236, contact the EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
89990 6017; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet www.easa.europa.eu.
You may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (4) You may view this material at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. This
material may be found in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2019-0716.
    (5) You may view this material that is incorporated by reference
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on October 10, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-23712 Filed 10-30-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P