[Federal Register: April 5, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 65)]
[Notices]
[Page 16838-16839]
[DOCID:fr05ap07-138]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-55557; File No. SR-ISE-2006-78]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the
Facilitation Mechanism

March 29, 2007.
    On December 13, 2006, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ to amend ISE Rule 716(d) to
allow an Electronic Access Member (``EAM'') to execute a transaction
through the Exchange's Facilitation Mechanism wherein the EAM has
solicited interest from other parties to execute against a block-sized
order it represents as agent, in addition to facilitating such orders
with orders from the EAM's proprietary account. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on February
12, 2007.\3\ The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This
order approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55236 (February 2,
2007), 72 FR 6633.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange \4\ and, in
particular, the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.\5\
Specifically, the Commission believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Act because it is a reasonable modification
designed to provide additional flexibility for the Exchange's members
to obtain block-sized executions on behalf of their customers. The
Commission notes that Supplementary Material .01 to ISE Rule 716
provides that the use of the Facilitation Mechanism does not alter a
member's best execution duty to obtain the best price for its customer.
The Commission also notes that Supplementary Material .05 to ISE Rule
716 requires that any solicited contra orders entered by Exchange
members to trade against agency orders may not be for the account of an
ISE market maker that is assigned to the options class.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \6\ The Exchange confirmed that, in addition to orders solicited
pursuant to paragraph (e) of ISE Rule 716, the last sentence of
Supplement .05 to ISE Rule 716 also applies to orders solicited
pursuant to paragraph (d) of ISE Rule 716. Telephone conversation on
March 28, 2007 between Joseph Ferraro, Associate General Counsel,
ISE and Jennifer Dodd, Special Counsel, Division of Market
Regulation, Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\7\ that the proposed rule change (SR-ISE-2006-78) be, and hereby
is approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-6377 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:This document concerns pages 2946 through 3149 of BMI France response to an information collection request.


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 197 (Friday, October 9, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64084-64089]
[FR Doc No: 2020-21986]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2020-0161; FRL-10014-82-Region 6]

Air Plan Approval; Texas; Reasonable Further Progress Plan for
the Dallas-Fort Worth Ozone Nonattainment Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions
to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) to meet the Reasonable
Further Progress (RFP) requirements for the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW)
serious ozone nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve
the RFP demonstration and associated motor vehicle emission budgets,
contingency measures should the area fail to make RFP emissions
reductions or attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS by the applicable attainment
date, and a revised 2011 base year emissions inventory for the DFW
area.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 9, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2020-0161, at https://www.regulations.gov or via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written
comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please contact Carrie Paige, 214-665-
6521<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance
on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may not be publicly
available due to docket file size restrictions or content (e.g., CBI).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carrie Paige, EPA Region 6 Office,
Infrastructure & Ozone Section,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Out
of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our staff, the
EPA Region 6 office may be closed to the public to reduce the risk of
transmitting COVID-19. We encourage the public to submit comments via
https://www.regulations.gov, as there may be a delay in processing mail
and courier or hand deliveries may not be accepted. Please call or
email the contact listed above if you need alternative access to
material indexed but not provided in the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' means the EPA.

I. Introduction

    On May 13, 2020, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
(TCEQ or State) submitted to EPA a SIP revision addressing RFP
requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the two serious ozone
nonattainment areas in Texas (``the TCEQ submittal''). These two areas
are the DFW and the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria (HGB) areas. The TCEQ
submittal also establishes motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for
the year 2020 and includes contingency measures for each of the DFW and
HGB areas, should either area fail to make reasonable further progress,
or to attain the NAAQS by the applicable attainment date.
    In this rulemaking action, we are addressing only that portion of
the TCEQ submittal that refers to the DFW area. We are proposing to
approve the RFP demonstration and associated contingency measures for
RFP or failure to attain and MVEBs for the DFW area. We are also
proposing to approve a revised 2011 base year emissions inventory (EI)
for the DFW area. The portion of the TCEQ submittal that refers to the
HGB area will be addressed in a separate rulemaking action.

II. Background

    In 2008, we revised the 8-hour ozone primary and secondary NAAQS to
a level of 0.075 parts per million (ppm) to provide increased
protection of public health and the environment (73 FR 16436, March 27,
2008).\1\ The DFW area was classified as a moderate ozone nonattainment
area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS \2\ and given an attainment date

of no later than December 31, 2018 (77 FR 30088, May 21, 2012). The DFW
area consists of Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman,
Parker, Tarrant, Rockwall, and Wise counties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On October 1, 2015, the EPA promulgated a more protective 8-
hour ozone standard of 0.070 ppm (80 FR 65292, October 26, 2015). On
April 30, 2018, the EPA promulgated designations under the 2015
ozone standard (83 FR 25776, June 4, 2018) and in that action, the
EPA designated Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman,
Parker, Tarrant, and Wise counties as a marginal ozone nonattainment
area. The RFP plan is not required for a marginal nonattainment area
under the 2015 ozone standard. The TCEQ submittal does not
specifically address the 2015 ozone standard, but provides progress
toward attaining the new standard. For more information on ozone,
see our Technical Support Document (TSD) in the docket for this
rulemaking and visit https://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozone-pollution.
    \2\ Throughout this document, we refer to the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS as the ``2008 ozone NAAQS.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 23, 2014, the D.C. Circuit Court issued a decision
rejecting, among other things, our attainment deadlines for the 2008
ozone nonattainment areas, finding that we did not have statutory
authority under the CAA to extend those deadlines to the end of the
calendar year. NRDC v. EPA, 777 F.3d 456, 464-69 (D.C. Cir. 2014).
Consistent with the court's decision we modified the attainment
deadlines for all nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone NAAQS and set
the attainment deadline for all 2008 ozone moderate nonattainment
areas, including the DFW area as July 20, 2018 (80 FR 12264, March 6,
2015). The DFW area did not meet the moderate attainment date and was
reclassified as a serious ozone nonattainment area (84 FR 44238, August
23, 2019).\3\ Accordingly, the State was required to submit revisions
to the DFW SIP to meet serious area requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ For more on the history of ozone in the DFW area, see our
TSD in the docket for this rulemaking and visit https://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/sip/dfw/dfw-ozone-history.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The CAA requires that areas designated as nonattainment for ozone
and classified as moderate or worse demonstrate RFP by reducing
emissions of ozone precursors (nitrogen oxides or NOX and
volatile organic compounds or VOC).\4\ The EPA's final rule to
implement the 2008 ozone standard (the ``SIP Requirements Rule'' or
``SRR'') addressed, among other things, the RFP control and planning
obligations as they apply to areas designated nonattainment for the
2008 ozone standard (80 FR 12264). In the SRR, RFP was defined (for the
purposes of the 2008 ozone standard) as meaning the progress reductions
required under sections 172(c)(2) and 182(b)(1) and (c)(2)(B) and
(c)(2)(C) of the CAA (80 FR 12264, 12313).\5\ RFP plans must also
include a MVEB, which provides the allowable on-road mobile emissions
an area can produce and continue to demonstrate RFP (57 FR 13498,
13558, April 16, 1992).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See CAA sections 172(c)(2) and 182(b)(1) and 40 CFR 51.1110.
    \5\ See 40 CFR 51.1110.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The RFP plan for the DFW moderate ozone nonattainment area for the
2008 ozone NAAQS was approved on December 7, 2016 and it demonstrated
required emissions reductions through the end of calendar year 2017 (81
FR 88124). Because the DFW area was reclassified as a serious ozone
nonattainment area, pursuant to CAA section 182(c)(2) and 40 CFR
51.1110, the RFP SIP for the DFW area must demonstrate NOX
and/or VOC emissions reductions of at least 3 percent for each of
calendar years 2018, 2019, and 2020 and an additional 3 percent for
contingency measures in 2021, should the area fail to meet RFP or fail
to attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS by the July 20, 2021 attainment date.
Finally, the emissions reductions must occur within the DFW area.

III. EPA's Evaluation of the TCEQ Submittal

    We reviewed the TCEQ submittal for consistency with the
requirements of the CAA and EPA regulations and guidance. A summary of
our analysis and findings are provided below. For a more detailed
discussion of our evaluation, please see our TSD in the docket for this
rulemaking action.

A. Revised 2011 Base Year Emissions Inventory

    An emissions inventory (EI) is a collection of data that lists, by
source, the amount of air pollutants discharged into the atmosphere,
during a year or other time period. The EI includes estimates of the
emissions associated with the air quality problems in the area (in this
case, NOX and VOC) from various pollution sources.
    Pursuant to the EI regulations at 40 CFR 51.1115, the State
submitted a base year EI for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, which we approved
for the DFW area.\6\ The State submitted a revised 2011 base year EI
for the moderate nonattainment area RFP plan for the DFW area, which we
approved (81 FR 88124). In the TCEQ submittal, the State further
refined the 2011 base year EI for the DFW area. Pursuant to 40 CFR
51.1110(b), the values in the submitted 2011 base year EI are actual
ozone season day emissions. Pursuant to CAA sections 172(c)(3) and
182(b)(1), the submitted 2011 base year EI consists of NOX
and VOC emissions from all sources inside the nonattainment area.
Compared with the 2011 base year EI that we previously approved at 81
FR 88124 (December 7, 2016), the submitted 2011 base year
NOX emissions decrease by 26.97 tons per day (tpd) and VOC
emissions increase by 14.94 tpd. The revised 2011 base year EI was
developed using EPA-approved guidelines for point, mobile, and area
emission sources. Point source emissions data for 2011 were pulled from
the State of Texas Air Reporting System (STARS) database--these data
also include all authorized/planned Startup, Shutdown and Maintenance
emissions.\7\ On-road and nonroad mobile source emissions were
calculated using the EPA's MOVES2014a model \8\ combined with local
activity inputs including vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and average
speed data, as well as local fleet, age distribution, and fuels
information. Area sources include many categories of emissions. The EPA
finds that these sources were adequately accounted for in the revised
2011 base year EI. The methodology used to calculate emissions for each
respective category followed relevant EPA EI guidance \9\ and was
sufficiently documented in the TCEQ submittal.\10\ We are proposing to
approve the revised 2011 base year EI. Table 1 summarizes the revised
EI for the DFW area. See our TSD for more detail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 80 FR 9204, February 20, 2015.
    \7\ States are not obligated to include malfunction emissions in
the base year inventory for RFP plans. See the discussion beginning
on page 83 of Emissions Inventory Guidance for Implementation of
Ozone and Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) and Regional Haze Regulations EPA-454/B-17-003, available at
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-07/documents/ei_guidance_may_2017_final_rev.pdf (hereinafter referred to as
``EPA's EI Guidance'') (July 2017).
    \8\ EPA's Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) is a state-
of-the-science emission modeling system that estimates emissions for
mobile sources at the national, county, and project level for
criteria air pollutants, greenhouse gases, and air toxics. See
https://www.epa.gov/moves.
    \9\ In addition to EPA's EI Guidance, see MOVES2014 and
MOVES2014a Technical Guidance: Using MOVES to Prepare Emission
Inventories for State Implementation Plans and Transportation
Conformity, EPA-420-B-15-093, available at https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P100NN9L.PDF?Dockey=P100NN9L.pdf (Nov. 2015).
    \10\ See our TSD and the TCEQ submittal with appendices in the
docket for this rulemaking.

                          Table 1--Previously Approved (81 FR 88124), and Updated RFP Base Year EIs for the DFW Area 2011 Base Year Inventory, Reported in Tons per Day
                                                                                [tpd]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                NOX                                                             VOC
                                                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Source type                                Approved at 81 FR 88124             TCEQ submittal              Approved at 81 FR 88124             TCEQ submittal
                                                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    9 Counties         Wise         9 Counties         Wise         9 Counties         Wise         9 Counties         Wise
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point...........................................................           31.34            8.61           31.34            8.61           27.66            2.14           27.54            2.35
Area............................................................           37.69           13.29           37.69           13.29          262.36           28.95          262.35           28.95
Non-road Mobile.................................................          110.26            6.69           86.08            5.96           53.38            1.25           40.28            1.21
On-road Mobile..................................................          235.23            5.90          231.83            7.24          102.39            1.73          100.19            2.05
Subtotal........................................................          414.52           34.49          386.94           35.10          445.79           34.07          430.36           34.56
                                                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................................................              449.01
                                                                              422.04
                                                                              479.86
                                                                              464.92
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Reasonable Further Progress Demonstration

    To calculate the required RFP emission reductions, CAA section 182
and 40 CFR 51.1110(b) require that the percent reduction be calculated
from the base year EI. The required reductions are then subtracted from
the 2011 base year EI to provide the RFP emissions target numbers. See
our TSD and the TCEQ submittal for more detail. The RFP calculations
are shown in Table 2.

   Table 2--Calculation of RFP Target Emission Reductions Through 2020
                                  [tpd]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Description                      NOX             VOC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. 2011 Emissions Inventory for Wise               35.10           34.56
 County (from Table 1)..................
b. Percent of VOC to meet 15% reduction   ..............              15
 for Wise County........................
c. 2011 Emissions Inventory for the 9             386.94          430.36
 Counties (from Table 1)................
d. Percent of NOX and VOC to meet 15%                 14               1
 reduction for the 9 Counties
 (percentages must total 15)............
e. Total Emissions Inventory for all 10           422.04          464.92
 Counties (from Table 1)................
f. Percent of NOX and VOC to meet 9%                   8               1
 reduction..............................
g. 15% NOX and VOC reduction, 2011-2017,  ..............            5.18
 for Wise County (row a multiplied by
 row b) (34.56 x 0.15 = 5.18)...........
h. 15% NOX and VOC reduction, 2011-2017,           54.17            4.30
 for the 9 Counties (row c multiplied by
 row d) (386.94 x 0.14 = 54.17) and
 (430.36 x 0.01 = 4.30).................
i. 9% NOX and VOC reduction, 2018-2020             33.76            4.65
 (row e multiplied by row f) (422.04 x
 0.08 = 33.76) and (464.92 x 0.01 =
 4.65)..................................
j. Total emissions reductions for 2011-            87.93           14.13
 2020 (add rows g, h, and i)............
k. 2020 Target Level of Emissions (row e          334.11          450.79
 minus row j)...........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To determine whether the area is able to meet the RFP target, the
State must establish the future year (2020) EI and subtract any control
measures that will be applied to sources in the DFW area. Section
182(b)(1)(A) of the Act requires that states provide sufficient control
measures in their RFP plans to offset growth in emissions. The controls
identified by the State to achieve RFP are listed in Table 3. For more
detail on these controls, see our TSD and the TCEQ submittal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ I/M is not implemented in Wise County--see 82 FR 27122
(June 14, 2017).
    \12\ The increase in NOX emissions is due to the
engine modifications required to meet the VOC and CO standards of
the Small SI Phase 1.

  Table 3--DFW Area Control Measures and Projected Emission Reductions,
                                2011-2020
                                  [tpd]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Control strategy description              NOX             VOC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Motor Vehicle Control Program             796.66          290.23
 (FMVCP)................................
Reformulated Gasoline (RFG)/East Texas             54.23           15.17
 Regional use of gasoline with low Reid
 Vapor Pressure (RVP)/Low Sulfur
 Gasoline/Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD)
Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) \11\...            6.87            8.14
On-road Texas Low Emission Diesel                   2.65            0.00
 (TxLED)................................
Tier I and II locomotive NOX standards..           19.15            0.74
Small non-road Spark Ignition (SI)                 -3.88           33.19
 engines (Phase I) \12\.................
Heavy duty non-road engines.............           37.44           14.79
Tiers 2 and 3 non-road diesel engines...           38.06            3.15
Small non-road SI engines (Phase II)....            2.71           32.19
Large non-road SI and recreational                 36.77           16.48
 marine.................................
Non-road TxLED..........................            3.89            0.00
Non-road RFG............................            0.01            0.49
Tier 4 non-road diesel engines..........           25.93            1.14

Small SI (Phase III)....................            2.47           16.99
Drilling rigs: Federal engine standards             0.31            0.11
 and TxLED..............................
                                         -------------------------------
    Total Projected Emission Reductions.        1,023.27          432.81
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To determine whether the area will meet the RFP targets, we
subtract the projected emission reductions (Table 3) from the projected
EI of uncontrolled emissions for 2020. The projected EI will reflect
emissions resulting from anticipated changes in activity from 2011 to
2020, such as emissions increases due to growth in population and VMT.
The projected EI was also adjusted to account for available (unused)
emissions credits--to account for the possible use of banked emissions,
all banked emissions reduction credit (ERC) and discrete emissions
reduction credit (DERC) data were also used to forecast growth.\13\ The
methodology used to forecast the 2020 emissions for each respective
category followed relevant EPA EI guidance and was sufficiently
documented in the TCEQ submittal. The projected EI data in Table 4 are
labeled as ``uncontrolled'' emissions. To achieve RFP, the amount of
emissions remaining after subtracting the emissions reductions from the
control measures must be equal to or less than the target inventories
calculated in Table 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Emissions credits are banked emissions reductions that may
return to the air shed in the future when these emissions credits
are used either to modify existing facilities, construct new
facilities, or demonstrate compliance with source-specific emissions
limit obligations where provided for in Texas SIP rules. For more
detail, see the TSD and the TCEQ submittal.

   Table 4--Summary of RFP Demonstration for the DFW Area Through 2020
                                  [tpd]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Description                      NOX             VOC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. 2020 Uncontrolled emissions..........        1,307.93          855.96
b. Projected emissions reductions               1,023.27          432.81
 through 2020 (from Table 3)............
c. Projected Emissions after Reductions           284.66          423.15
 (subtract line b from line a)..........
d. 3% reductions reserved for prior                 8.44            4.65
 (2017-2018) RFP milestone contingency
 measures...............................
e. Projected emissions, including prior           293.10          427.80
 contingency requirement (add lines c
 and d).................................
f. 2020 Target (from Table 3 above, line          334.11          450.79
 k).....................................
If the projected emissions (line e) are              Yes             Yes
 less than the RFP target (line f), the
 area demonstrates RFP. Is line e less
 than line f?...........................
g. Subtract line e from line f for                 41.01           22.99
 surplus................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Table 4, we see that the projected emissions in row e, after
accounting for reductions from controls and the 2017-2018 contingency
measures, are less than the 2020 RFP target emissions and thus,
demonstrate RFP. We are proposing that the emissions reductions
projected for 2020 are sufficient to meet the 2020 RFP targets.

C. Contingency Measures

    As noted earlier, RFP plans for moderate and above nonattainment
areas must include contingency measures, which, consistent with CAA
section 172(c)(9), ``shall provide for the implementation of specific
measures to be undertaken if the area fails to make reasonable further
progress, or to attain the national primary ambient air quality
standard by the attainment date applicable under this part.'' EPA has
long interpreted the contingency measures provision to allow states to
rely on measures already in place and implemented so long as those
reductions are beyond those relied on for purposes of the attainment or
RFP planning SIP.\14\ In addition, the April 16, 1992 General Preamble
provided the following guidance: ``States must show that their
contingency measures can be implemented with minimal further action on
their part and with no additional rulemaking actions such as public
hearings or legislative review. In general, EPA will expect all actions
needed to affect full implementation of the measures to occur within 60
days after EPA notifies the State of its failure'' (57 FR 13512, April
16, 1992).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ This interpretation has been upheld by the Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals (and the State of Texas is within the Fifth Circuit
jurisdiction). See LEAN v. EPA, 382 F.3d 575 (5th Cir. 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While the CAA does not specify the type of measures or quantity of
emissions reductions required, EPA interprets the CAA to mean that
implementation of these contingency measures would provide additional
emissions reductions of up to 3 percent of the adjusted base year
inventory (or a lesser percentage that will make up the identified
shortfall) in the year following the missed milestone, whether it be
RFP or attainment.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See the April 16, 1992 General Preamble section III.A.3.c
(57 FR 13498 at 13511).
    \16\ As noted earlier in this rulemaking, the I/M program was
approved into the SIP in 2001 (66 FR 57261). See footnotes 14 and 15
regarding approval of RFG and TxLED in the SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The TCEQ submittal provides NOX and VOC emission
reductions to meet the requirement for contingency measures for the DFW
area. These contingency measure reductions are not otherwise relied
upon for RFP or for attainment. The TCEQ submittal includes but is not
limited to surplus emissions reductions from the 2020 RFP demonstration
(see Table 4, line g) for the DFW area contingency measure
demonstration. The TCEQ submittal also includes emission reductions
that will take place during calendar year 2021 for the DFW area
contingency measure demonstration--these contingency measures consist
of State mobile source measures that are already approved in the SIP
(I/M, RFG, and TxLED) \16\ and federal measures (FMVCP and ULSD). Thus,
the contingency measures for 2021 are

reliable, permanent, and enforceable. The contingency measures are
listed in Table 5.

     Table 5--Demonstration of the DFW Area RFP Contingency Measures
                                  [tpd]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Description                      NOX             VOC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. 2011 Base year emissions (from Table           422.04          464.92
 1).....................................
b. Percent of NOX and VOC to meet                      2               1
 contingency measure requirement
 (percentage must total 3)..............
c. 3% NOX reduction for 2021 (row a                 8.44            4.65
 multiplied by row b) (422.04 x 0.02 =
 8.44, and 464.92 x 0.01 = 4.65)........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excess reductions to meet contingency                NOX             VOC
 requirement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
d. Surplus RFP reductions (from Table 4)           41.01           22.99
e. Subtract 2020 RFP MVEB safety margin.           -9.76           -5.68
f. 2020 to 2021 emission reductions                24.69            9.12
 (FMVCP, I/M, RFG, East Texas Regional
 low RVP, 2017 low sulfur gasoline
 standard on-road TxLED, and ULSD)......
g. 2020 to 2021 emission reductions                 2.75            2.48
 (federal non-road mobile new vehicle
 certification standards, non-road RFG,
 and non-road TxLED)....................
h. Total projected emissions reductions,           58.69           28.91
 accounting for MVEB safety margin (add
 lines d, e, f, and g)..................
If the projected reductions (line h) are             Yes             Yes
 greater or equal to the reductions
 needed to meet the contingency
 requirement (line c), then the
 contingency requirement is met. Is line
 h greater than line c?.................
Subtract line c from line h for surplus.           50.25           24.26
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Table 5, we see that the contingency measures provided for the
DFW area, after accounting for the MVEB safety margin, are more than
sufficient to meet the 3 percent contingency requirement. Indeed, if
the DFW area relied only on the contingency measures scheduled for
implementation during 2021 (Table 5, lines f and g), after accounting
for the MVEB safety margin, those contingency measures alone would be
adequate to meet the 3 percent contingency requirement. In addition,
the contingency measures that occur from 2020 to 2021 are State and
Federal measures that are already approved into the Texas SIP and as
such are expected to be implemented with no further action by the State
and with no additional rulemaking actions. Our evaluation of these
contingency measures finds that the full implementation of such
measures within 60 days after EPA notifies the State of its failure is
achievable because the contingency measures that occur from 2020 to
2021 are State and Federal measures already approved into the Texas SIP
and as such are expected to be implemented with no further action by
the State. We are proposing to approve the contingency measures for the
DFW area.

D. Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets

    The MVEB is the mechanism to determine if future transportation
plans conform to the SIP. Transportation conformity is required by CAA
section 176(c) and mandates that future transportation plans must not
produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, delay
RFP milestones, or delay timely attainment of the NAAQS. Thus, pursuant
to CAA section 176(c), the RFP plan must include MVEBs for
transportation conformity purposes. The MVEB is the maximum amount of
emissions allowed in the SIP for on-road motor vehicles. The DFW RFP
SIP contains VOC and NOX MVEBs for RFP milestone year 2020
(see Table 6). On-road emissions must be shown in future transportation
plans to be less than the MVEBs for 2020 and subsequent years.
    EPA is evaluating the adequacy of the submitted MVEBs in parallel
to this proposed approval action. Once EPA finds the submitted MVEBs
are adequate for transportation conformity purposes, those MVEBs must
be used by State and Federal agencies in determining whether proposed
transportation projects conform to the SIP as required by section
176(c) of the CAA. EPA's criteria for determining adequacy of a MVEB
are set out in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). The process for determining
adequacy is described in our TSD.
    EPA intends to make its determination on the adequacy of the 2020
RFP MVEBs for the DFW area for transportation conformity purposes soon,
by completing the adequacy process that was started on June 3,
2020.\17\ After EPA finds the 2020 MVEBs adequate or approves them, the
new MVEBs for NOX and VOC must be used for future
transportation conformity determinations. For required regional
emissions analysis years 2020 and beyond, the applicable budgets will
be the new 2020 MVEBs. We are proposing to approve the 2020 MVEBs for
the DFW area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ On June 3, 2020, EPA posted the DFW area NOX and
VOC MVEBs on EPA's website for the purpose of soliciting public
comments, as part of the adequacy process. The comment period closed
on July 3, 2020, and we received no comments. For more information,
visit https://www.epa.gov/state-and-local-transportation/state-implementation-plans-sip-submissions-currently-under-epa#dallas-fort-worth-rea.

          Table 6--RFP Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets for DFW
                                  [tpd]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      Year                            NOX         VOC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2020............................................     107.25       62.41
------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Proposed Action

    We are proposing to approve revisions to the Texas SIP that address
the RFP requirements for the DFW serious ozone nonattainment area for
the 2008 ozone NAAQS. Specifically, we are proposing to approve the RFP
demonstration and associated MVEBs, contingency measures for RFP or
failure-to-attain, and the revised 2011 base year EI for the DFW area.
Further, as part of today's action, EPA is describing the status of its
adequacy determination for the NOX and VOC MVEBs for 2020 in
accordance with 40 CFR 93.118(f)(2). Within 24 months from the
effective date of EPA's adequacy determination for the MVEBs or the
publication date for the final rule for this action, whichever is
earlier, the transportation partners will need to demonstrate
conformity to the new NOX and VOC MVEBs pursuant to 40 CFR
93.104(e)(3).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will
not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: September 30, 2020.
Kenley McQueen,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2020-21986 Filed 10-8-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 154 (Thursday, August 11, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49515-49519]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16612]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0462; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-00647-T;
Amendment 39-22104; AD 2022-13-18]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 737-700, 737-800, 747-400, 747-8, 767-
400ER, and 777-200 airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report that
there is the potential for electrical current to pass through low
pressure (LP) oxygen flex-hoses in the gaseous passenger oxygen system.
This AD requires replacing each conductive oxygen flex-hose installed
on LP gaseous passenger oxygen systems with a serviceable non-
conductive oxygen flex-hose. This AD also prohibits installation of a
conductive oxygen flex-hose on LP gaseous passenger oxygen systems. The
FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: This AD is effective September 15, 2022.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of September 15,
2022.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Lufthansa Technik AG, Weg beim J[auml]ger 193 22335 Hamburg,
Germany; telephone 49-40-5070-67428; internet www.lufthansa-technik.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the
internet at www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2022-0462.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at
www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-
0462; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chirayu Gupta, Aerospace Engineer,
Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services Section, FAA, New York
ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the
Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued
EASA AD 2021-0135, dated June 2, 2021 (EASA AD 2021-0135) (also
referred to as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
the MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition for certain The Boeing
Company Model 737-700, 737-800, 747-400, 747-8, 767-400ER, and 777-200
airplanes with certain Lufthansa Technik AG supplemental type
certificates (STCs), which resulted in the installation of conductive
oxygen flex-hoses. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the
internet at www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2022-0462.
    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing
Company Model 737-700, 737-800, 747-400, 747-8, 767-400ER, and 777-200
airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on April 22, 2022
(87 FR 24073). The NPRM was prompted by a report that there is the
potential for electrical current to pass through LP oxygen flex-hoses
in the gaseous passenger oxygen system. Exposure to electrical faults,
such as unintended short circuits, can result in localized electrical
heating of the LP oxygen flex-hoses. The NPRM proposed to require
replacing each conductive oxygen flex-hose installed on LP gaseous
passenger oxygen systems with a serviceable non-conductive oxygen flex-
hose. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the possibility of
electrical current passing through the LP oxygen flex-hoses in the
gaseous passenger oxygen system, which could cause the flex-hoses to
melt or burn and result in an oxygen-fed fire in the passenger cabin.
See the MCAI for additional background information.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received a comment from Boeing who supported the NPRM
without change. The FAA also received a comment from United Airlines
who stated that the NPRM does not apply to any of its airplanes.

Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment of the Proposed Actions

    Aviation Partners Boeing stated that the installation of winglets
per STC ST00830SE does not affect the accomplishment of the
manufacturer's service instructions. The commenter noted that this STC
is for the applicable Model 737-700 and 737-800 airplanes identified in
the proposed AD and that it does not have any STCs for the other models
in the proposed AD.
    The FAA agrees with the commenter that STC ST00830SE does not
affect the accomplishment of the manufacturer's service instructions.
Therefore, the installation of STC ST00830SE does not affect the
ability to accomplish the actions required by this AD. The FAA has not
changed this AD in this regard.

Clarification of AD Applicability Revision

    Paragraph (c) of the proposed AD referred only to FAA STC ST04127NY
that the FAA has since determined only applies to a modification of a
Boeing Model 747-8 airplane that included the installation of
conductive oxygen flex-hoses. The FAA intended the AD applicability to
not be limited to just manufacturer serial number (MSN) 37500 that was
modified by STC ST04127NY, but to all MSNs identified in the proposed
AD that were modified by a Lufthansa Technik AG STC, which resulted in
the installation of conductive oxygen flex-hoses. Therefore, the FAA
has determined that including reference to the STCs that installed the
conductive oxygen flex-hoses is redundant and unnecessary. Paragraph
(c) of this AD has been revised in order to clarify this AD is
applicable to the MSNs identified in paragraph (c) of this AD that have
conductive oxygen flex-hoses specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as
proposed. Except for minor editorial changes, this AD is adopted as
proposed in the NPRM. None of the changes will increase the economic
burden on any operator.

Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Lufthansa Technik AG has issued the following service information.
     Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary ASN-00-DCS-01,
Revision 8, dated November 5, 2020.
     Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary ATB-25-DCS-01,
Revision 10, dated January 7, 2021.
     Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary ATR-23-DCS-01,
Revision 2, dated January 7, 2021.
     Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCM-35-DCS-01,
dated January 4, 2021.
     Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCP-35-DCS-01,
Revision 1, dated April 20, 2021.
     Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCQ-35-DCS-01,
Revision 1, dated April 20, 2021.
     Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCR-35-DCS-01,
Revision 1, dated April 20, 2021.
     Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCS-35-DCS-01,
dated January 5, 2021.
     Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCU-35-DCS-01,
dated January 5, 2021.
     Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCV-35-DCS-01,
dated February 4, 2021.
     Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCW-35-DCS-01,
dated January 4, 2021.
     Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCX-35-DCS-01,
Revision 1, dated February 4, 2021.
    This service information describes procedures for replacing each
conductive oxygen flex-hose installed on LP gaseous passenger oxygen
systems with a serviceable non-conductive oxygen flex-hose. These
documents are distinct since they apply to different airplane models
and manufacturer serial numbers.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD will affect 7 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Labor cost                   Parts cost         Cost per product         Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 17 work-hours x $85 per hour = Up          $10,090  Up to $11,535.............  Up to $80,745.
 to $1,445.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2022-13-18 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-22104; Docket No. FAA-
2022-0462; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-00647-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective September 15,
2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-700, 737-800,
747-400, 747-8, 767-400ER, and 777-200 airplanes, certificated in
any category, manufacturer serial numbers (MSN) 28551, 28961, 29953,
30791, 30884, 32445, 32575, 32915, 32970, 32971, 33010, 33102,
33361, 33684, 34205, 37500, and 37544, with conductive oxygen flex-
hose having part number specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35, Oxygen.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report that there is the potential for
electrical current to pass through low pressure (LP) oxygen flex-
hoses in the gaseous passenger oxygen system. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address this condition, which could cause the flex-hoses
to melt or burn and result in an oxygen-fed fire in the passenger
cabin.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Replacement

    Within 48 months after the effective date of this AD: Replace
each conductive oxygen flex-hose installed on LP gaseous passenger
oxygen systems with a serviceable non-

conductive oxygen flex-hose, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable Lufthansa Technik Design Change
Summary (TS-145 Installation Document Number) corresponding to the
affected part numbers specified in figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this
AD.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR11AU22.010

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR11AU22.011

BILLING CODE 4910-13-C

(h) Parts Installation Prohibition

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
prohibited conductive oxygen flex-hose specified in figure 1 to
paragraph (g) of this AD, on LP gaseous passenger oxygen systems on
any airplane.

(i) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using the service information in paragraphs (i)(1)
through (6) of this AD.
    (1) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary ASN-00-DCS-01,
Revision 6, dated June 25, 2020.

    (2) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary ASN-00-DCS-01,
Revision 7, dated August 26, 2020.
    (3) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCP-35-DCS-01, dated
January 5, 2021.
    (4) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCQ-35-DCS-01, dated
January 7, 2021.
    (5) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCR-35-DCS-01, dated
January 7, 2021.
    (6) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCX-35-DCS-01, dated
January 7, 2021.

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If
sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight
Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or the European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Lufthansa Technik AG's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(k) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA AD 2021-0135, dated June 2, 2021, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2022-0462.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Chirayu Gupta,
Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services
Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].
    (3) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(4) and (5) of this AD.

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary ASN-00-DCS-01,
Revision 8, dated November 5, 2020.
    (ii) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary ATB-25-DCS-01,
Revision 10, dated January 7, 2021.
    (iii) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary ATR-23-DCS-01,
Revision 2, dated January 7, 2021.
    (iv) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCM-35-DCS-01,
dated January 4, 2021.
    (v) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCP-35-DCS-01,
Revision 1, dated April 20, 2021.
    (vi) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCQ-35-DCS-01,
Revision 1, dated April 20, 2021.
    (vii) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCR-35-DCS-01,
Revision 1, dated April 20, 2021.
    (viii) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCS-35-DCS-01,
dated January 5, 2021.
    (ix) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCU-35-DCS-01,
dated January 5, 2021.
    (x) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCV-35-DCS-01, dated
February 4, 2021.
    (xi) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCW-35-DCS-01,
dated January 4, 2021.
    (xii) Lufthansa Technik Design Change Summary BCX-35-DCS-01,
Revision 1, dated February 4, 2021.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Lufthansa Technik AG, Weg beim J[auml]ger 193 22335 Hamburg,
Germany; telephone 49-40-5070-67428; internet www.lufthansa-technik.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email [email protected], or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on June 17, 2022.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-16612 Filed 8-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: January 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 19)]
[Notices]
[Page 4904]
[DOCID:fr29ja10-132]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2009-61]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received

Correction

    In notice document 2010-808 beginning on page 2925 in the issue of
Tuesday, January 19, 2010, make the following correction:
    On page 2925, in the third column, under the DATE: heading,
``August 10, 2010'' is corrected to read ``February 8, 2010''.

[FR Doc. C1-2010-808 Filed 1-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D