[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55927-55930]
[FR Doc No: 2022-19472]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1113 Airspace Docket No. 22-AGL-20]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of V-6, V-10, V-30, V-100, and V-233 in the
Vicinity of Litchfield, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend VHF Omnidirectional Range (VOR)
Federal airways V-6, V-10, V-30, V-100, and V-233 in the vicinity of
Litchfield, MI. The airway modifications are necessary due to the
planned decommissioning of the VOR portion of

the Litchfield, MI, VOR/Distance Measuring Equipment (VOR/DME)
navigational aid (NAVAID). The Litchfield VOR/DME NAVAID provides
navigational guidance for portions of the affected VOR Federal airways
listed above and is planned to be decommissioned as part of the FAA's
VOR Minimum Operational Network (MON) program.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 28, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone:
(800) 647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2022-1113; Airspace Docket No. 22-AGL-20 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at
www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would modify the route structure as necessary to
preserve the safe and efficient flow of air traffic within the National
Airspace System (NAS).

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket
No.FAA-2022-1113; Airspace Docket No. 22-AGL-20) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
internet at www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to FAA Docket No.FAA-2022-1113; Airspace Docket No. 22-AGL-20.'' The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified comment
closing date will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the comment
closing date. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Operations Support Group, Central
Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021 and effective
September 15, 2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F
lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service
routes, and reporting points.

Background

    The FAA is planning decommissioning activities for the VOR portion
of the Litchfield, MI, VOR/DME in April 2023. The Litchfield, MI, VOR
is a candidate VOR identified for discontinuance by the FAA's VOR MON
program and listed in the final policy statement notice, ``Provision of
Navigation Services for the Next Generation Air Transportation System
(NextGen) Transition to Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) (Plan for
Establishing a VOR Minimum Operational Network),'' published in the
Federal Register of July 26, 2016 (81 FR 48694), Docket No. FAA-2011-
1082.
    Although the VOR portion of the Litchfield VOR/DME is planned for
decommissioning, the co-located DME portion of the NAVAID is being
retained.
    The existing ATS route dependencies to the Litchfield, MI, VOR/DME
NAVAID are VOR Federal airways V-6, V-10, V-30, V-100, and V-233. With
the planned decommissioning of the VOR portion of the Litchfield VOR/
DME, the remaining ground-based NAVAID coverage in the area is
insufficient to enable the continuity of the affected airways. As such,
proposed modifications to the affected VOR Federal airways would result
in expanding the existing gaps in four of the airways (V-6, V-10, V-30,
and V-233) and redefining an airway end point in the remaining airway
(V-100).
    To overcome the loss of the airway segments on all five affected
airways, instrument flight rules (IFR) traffic may request air traffic
control (ATC) radar vectors to fly through or circumnavigate the
affected area. Additionally, IFR pilots equipped with area navigation
(RNAV) capabilities may also navigate point to point using the existing
Fixes that will remain in place as fixes or waypoints to support
continued operations though the affected area. Visual flight rules
(VFR) pilots who elect to navigate via the airways through the affected
area could also take

advantage of the ATC services listed previously.
    Prior to this NPRM, the FAA published a rule for Docket No. FAA-
2021-1043 in the Federal Register (87 FR 50563; August 17, 2022),
amending VOR Federal airway V-100 by removing the airway segment
between the Fort Dodge, IA, VOR/Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC) and
the Waterloo, IA, VOR/DME. That airway amendment, effective November 3,
2022, is included in this NPRM.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to amend VOR
Federal airways V-6, V-10, V-30, V-100, and V-233. The planned
decommissioning of the VOR portion of the Litchfield, MI, VOR/DME has
made this action necessary. The proposed VOR Federal airway changes are
outlined below.
    V-6: V-6 currently extends between the Oakland, CA, VOR/DME and the
DuPage, IL, VOR/DME; between the intersection of the Chicago Heights,
IL, VORTAC 358[deg] and Gipper, MI, VORTAC 271[deg] radials (NILES Fix)
and the intersection of the Gipper, MI, VORTAC 092[deg] and Litchfield,
MI, VOR/DME 196[deg] radials (MODEM Fix); and between the Philipsburg,
PA, VORTAC and the La Guardia, NY, VOR/DME. The FAA proposes to remove
the airway segment between the intersection of the Chicago Heights, IL,
VORTAC 358[deg] and Gipper, MI, VORTAC 271[deg] radials (NILES Fix) and
the intersection of the Gipper, MI, VORTAC 092[deg] and Litchfield, MI,
VOR/DME 196[deg] radials (MODEM Fix). The unaffected portions of the
existing airway would remain as charted.
    V-10: V-10 currently extends between the Pueblo, CO, VORTAC and the
intersection of the Bradford, IL, VORTAC 058[deg] and Joliet, IL, VOR/
DME 287[deg] radials (PLANO Fix); between the intersection of the
Chicago Heights, IL, VORTAC 358[deg] and Gipper, MI, VORTAC 271[deg]
radials (NILES Fix) and the Litchfield, MI, VOR/DME; and between the
Youngstown, OH, VORTAC and the Lancaster, PA, VOR/DME. The FAA proposes
to remove the airway segment between the Gipper, MI, VORTAC and the
Litchfield, MI, VOR/DME. The unaffected portions of the existing airway
would remain as charted.
    V-30: V-30 currently extends between the Badger, WI, VOR/DME and
the Litchfield, MI, VOR/DME; and between the Philipsburg, PA, VORTAC
and the Solberg, NJ, VOR/DME. The FAA proposes to remove the airway
segment between the Pullman, MI, VOR/DME and the Litchfield, MI, VOR/
DME. The unaffected portions of the existing airway would remain as
charted.
    V-100: V-100 currently extends between the Medicine Bow, WY, VOR/
DME and the O'Neill, NE, VORTAC; between the Waterloo, IA, VOR/DME and
the Dubuque, IA, VORTAC; and between the Northbrook, IL, VOR/DME and
the Litchfield, MI, VOR/DME. The FAA proposes to remove the airway
segment between the Keeler, MI, VOR/DME and the Litchfield, MI, VOR/
DME. The unaffected portions of the existing airway would remain as
charted.
    V-233: V-233 currently extends between the Spinner, IL, VORTAC and
the Litchfield, MI, VOR/DME; and between the Mount Pleasant, MI, VOR/
DME and the Pellston, MI, VORTAC. The FAA proposes to remove the airway
segment between the Goshen, IN, VORTAC and the Litchfield, MI, VOR/DME.
The unaffected portions of the existing airway would remain as charted.
    All radials listed in the VOR Federal airway descriptions below are
unchanged and stated in True degrees.
    VOR Federal airways are published in paragraph 6010(a) of FAA Order
JO 7400.11F, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September 15, 2021,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The VOR Federal
airways listed in this document would be published subsequently in the
FAA Order JO 7400.11.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this proposed rule,
when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal Airways.

* * * * *

V-6 [Amended]

    From Oakland, CA; INT Oakland 039[deg] and Sacramento, CA,
212[deg] radials; Sacramento; Squaw Valley, CA; Mustang, NV;
Lovelock, NV; Battle Mountain, NV; INT Battle Mountain 062[deg] and
Wells, NV, 256[deg] radials; Wells; 5 miles, 40 miles, 98 MSL, 85
MSL, Lucin, UT; 43 miles, 85 MSL, Ogden, UT; 11 miles, 50 miles, 105
MSL, Fort Bridger, WY; Rock Springs, WY; 20 miles, 39 miles, 95 MSL,
Cherokee, WY; 39 miles, 27 miles, 95 MSL, Medicine Bow, WY; INT
Medicine Bow 106[deg] and Sidney, NE, 291[deg] radials; Sidney;
North Platte, NE; Grand Island, NE; Omaha, IA; Des Moines, IA; Iowa
City, IA; Davenport, IA; INT Davenport 087[deg] and DuPage, IL,
255[deg] radials; to DuPage. From Philipsburg, PA; Selinsgrove, PA;
Allentown, PA; Solberg, NJ; INT Solberg 107[deg] and Yardley, PA,
068[deg] radials; INT Yardley 068[deg] and La Guardia, NY, 213[deg]
radials; to La Guardia.
* * * * *

V-10 [Amended]

    From Pueblo, CO; 18 miles, 48 miles, 60 MSL, Lamar, CO; Garden
City, KS; Dodge City, KS; Hutchinson, KS; Emporia, KS; INT Emporia
063[deg]and Napoleon, MO, 243[deg] radials; Napoleon; Kirksville,
MO; Burlington, IA; Bradford, IL; to INT Bradford 058[deg] and
Joliet, IL, 287[deg] radials. From INT Chicago Heights, IL, 358[deg]
and Gipper, MI,

271[deg] radials; to Gipper. From Youngstown, OH; INT Youngstown
116[deg] and Revloc, PA, 300[deg] radials; Revloc; INT Revloc
107[deg] and Lancaster, PA, 280[deg] radials; to Lancaster.
* * * * *

V-30 [Amended]

    From Badger, WI; INT Badger 102[deg] and Pullman, MI, 303[deg]
radials; to Pullman. From Philipsburg, PA; Selinsgrove, PA; East
Texas, PA; INT East Texas 095[deg] and Solberg, NJ, 264[deg]
radials; to Solberg.
* * * * *

V-100 [Amended]

    From Medicine Bow, WY; Scottsbluff, NE; Alliance, NE; Ainsworth,
NE; to O'Neill, NE. From Waterloo, IA; to Dubuque, IA. From
Northbrook, IL; INT Northbrook 095[deg] and Keeler, MI, 271[deg]
radials; to Keeler.
* * * * *

V-233 [Amended]

    From Spinner, IL; INT Spinner 061[deg] and Roberts, IL, 233[deg]
radials; Roberts; Knox, IN; to Goshen, IN. From Mount Pleasant, MI;
INT Mount Pleasant 351[deg] and Gaylord, MI, 207[deg] radials;
Gaylord; to Pellston, MI.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 1, 2022.
Scott M. Rosenbloom,
Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2022-19472 Filed 9-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34699-34700]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12117]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2022-0018; OMB No. 1660-0024]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Federal Assistance for Offsite Radiological Emergency
Preparedness and Planning

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: 60-Day notice of revision and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites
the general public to take this opportunity to comment on a revision of
a currently approved information collection. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice seeks comments concerning
all information collections related to FEMA Radiological Emergency
Preparedness Program requirements.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 8, 2022.

ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate submissions to the docket, please submit
comments at www.regulations.gov under Docket ID FEMA-2022-0018. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
    All submissions received must include the agency name and Docket
ID. Regardless of the method used for submitting comments or material,
all submissions will be posted, without change, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov, and will include any
personal information you provide. Therefore, submitting this
information makes it public. You may wish to read the Privacy and
Security Notice that is available via a link on the homepage of
www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Renae Connell, Emergency Management
Specialist, FEMA/NPD/THD, [email protected]. You may contact
the Information Management Division for copies of the proposed
collection of information at email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency's
(FEMA')s Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program coordinates
the National effort to provide State, Tribal and local governments with
relevant and executable planning, training, technical assistance, and
exercise guidance and policies necessary to ensure that adequate
capabilities exist to prepare for, respond to, and recover from
incidents involving commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs). The REP
Program assists State, Tribal and local governments in the development
and conduct of off-site emergency planning and preparedness activities
within the emergency planning zones (EPZs) of Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC)-licensed commercial nuclear power facilities.
    Sec. 109 of the NRC Authorization Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-295)
directed the NRC to establish emergency preparedness as a criterion for
licensing commercial NPPs. Specifically, section 109 of Public Law 96-
295 directed the NRC to establish through rulemaking, (a) standards,
developed with FEMA, for the evaluation of State and local government
radiological emergency planning and preparedness; and (b) a requirement
that the NRC will issue operating licenses. Before issuing a license,
the NRC must determine that there is (i) a State or local emergency
response plan compliant with the standards developed with FEMA or (ii)
in the absence of such a plan, a State, local, or utility emergency
response plan that provides reasonable assurance that public health and
safety is not endangered by the NPP's operation. See Public Law 96-295,
109 (b)(1)(A)-(B)). The NRC revised its regulations in part 50 of title
10 of the CFR to incorporate additional emergency preparedness
requirements, including 16 planning standards for onsite and offsite
emergency plans as required by Public Law 96-295. FEMA mirrors these 16
planning standards in Part 350, specifically at 44 CFR 350.5.
    In the communities surrounding commercial NPP, 44 CFR 350.5(b)
directs FEMA's REP Program to review offsite radiological emergency
plans and preparedness. In addition, 44 CFR 350.9 describes the
exercise process and

requirements that States, together with all appropriate local
governments, must conduct a joint exercise of that State plan,
involving full participation of appropriate local government entities,
the State and the appropriate licensee of the NRC. Approved plans and
preparedness ``must be determined to adequately protect the public
health and safety by providing reasonable assurance that appropriate
protective measures can be taken offsite in the event of a radiological
emergency.''
    FEMA defines reasonable assurance as a determination that State,
Tribal, local, and utility offsite plans and preparedness are adequate
to protect public health and safety in the EPZ of commercial NPP. FEMA
will consider plans, procedures, personnel, training, facilities,
equipment, drills, and exercises, which in its professional judgment
are critical for effective implementation of protective measures
offsite in the event of any incident at a commercial NPP. FEMA will
make its adequacy determination, supported by other Federal agencies,
as necessary, by conducting inspections, providing Staff Assistance
Visits (SAVs), organizing, conducting and reviewing training,
participating in, observing and evaluating drills and exercises, and by
being an engaged partner with Federal, State, Tribal, and local
government officials and industry stakeholders.
    State, Tribal, or local government participation in offsite
radiological emergency planning and preparedness is voluntary. However,
participation in the REP planning and preparedness process necessitates
adherence to the program requirements as set forth in 44 CFR part 350,
the joint NRC/FEMA document NUREG-0645/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 2, ``Criteria
for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans
and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants'' (and
supplements), and the REP Program Manual (RPM). The RPM consolidates
many of the REP Program's operative guidance and policy documents into
one location and provides guidance that interprets the planning
standards and evaluation criteria contained in NUREG-0654 and 44 CFR
part 350. See 76 FR 72431, November 23, 2011.
    As part of our collection to fulfill one of FEMA's missions, each
instrument is required for the performance of duties related to the
mission. Therefore, due to the maturity of the program and the
opportunity to reduce burden cost, there is an opportunity to
consolidate, improve, or remove collection instruments. Consequently,
collection instrument 44 CFR 350.9 (c) was added to collect information
and relief requests from exercise schedule outlined in 44 CFR 350.9.
Additionally, to further reduce burden cost, 44 CFR 352.4 has been
removed as it currently does not require approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) with FEMA only receiving one or no responses in a
given year.

Collection of Information

    Title: Federal Assistance for Offsite Radiological Emergency
Preparedness and Planning.
    Type of Information Collection: Extension, without change, of a
currently approved information collection].
    OMB Number: 1660-0024.
    FEMA Forms: There are no forms for this collection; rather the
regulatory text details the content in which information is transmitted
to FEMA.
    Abstract: The intent of this request is the collection of comments
on an extension, without change, of a currently approved information
collection an OMB control number representing all information
collections related to FEMA REP Program requirements described in 44
CFR parts 350 and 352.
    Affected Public: State, local or Tribal government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 104.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 104.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 3,400.
    Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost: $223,176.
    Estimated Respondents' Operation and Maintenance Costs: $0.
    Estimated Respondents' Capital and Start-Up Costs: $0.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost to the Federal Government: $652,598.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

Millicent Brown Wilson,
Records Management Branch Chief, Office of the Chief Administrative
Officer, Mission Support, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2022-12117 Filed 6-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-21-P


[Federal Register: March 17, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 51)]
[Notices]
[Page 12809]
[DOCID:fr17mr10-117]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Release Certain Properties From All Terms,
Conditions, Reservations and Restrictions of a Quitclaim Deed Agreement
Between the City of Melbourne and the Federal Aviation Administration
for the Melbourne International Airport, Melbourne, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides notice of intent to release certain
airport properties, 15.819 acres at the Melbourne International
Airport, Melbourne, Florida from the conditions, reservations, and
restrictions as contained in a Quitclaim Deed agreement between the FAA
and the City of Melbourne, dated August 6, 1947. The release of
property will allow the Melbourne Airport Authority to dispose of the
property for other than aeronautical purposes. The property is located
in the the Southwest \1/4\ of Section 21, Township 27 South, Range 37
East, Brevard County, Florida. The parcel is currently designated as
non-aeronautical use. The property will be disposed of for the purpose
of municipal use. The fair market value of the property has been
determined by appraisal to be $1,061,211. The airport will receive fair
market value for the property, which will be subsequently reinvested in
another eligible airport improvement project.
    Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are available, by
appointment only, for inspection at the Melbourne International Airport
and the FAA Airports District Office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) requires the
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment prior to
the ``waiver'' or ``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to
use certain airport land for non-aeronautical purposes.

DATE: Comments are due on or before April 16, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review at the Melbourne
International Airport, and the FAA Airports District Office, 5950
Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822. Written
comments on the Sponsor's request must be delivered or mailed to:
Rebecca R. Henry, Program Manager, Orlando Airports District Office,
5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca R. Henry, Program Manager,
Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite
400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

W. Dean Stringer,
Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2010-5522 Filed 3-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 69)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18403]
[DOCID:fr12ap10-6]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-1014; Airspace Docket No. 09-ANM-10]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Rifle, CO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action will establish Class E airspace at Rifle, CO.
Additional controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate aircraft
executing new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System (GPS)
Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) at Garfield County
Regional Airport. This will improve the safety of Instrument Flight
Rules (IFR) operations at the airport. This action also changes the
airport name in the existing Class E airspace description.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, June 3, 2010. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On November 27, 2009, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to establish additional controlled
airspace at Rifle, CO (74 FR 62259). Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on
the proposal to the FAA. One comment was received in support of the
proposed Class E-2 Airspace.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6002 and
6005, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9T signed August 27, 2009, and
effective September 15, 2009, which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR part 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this
document will be published subsequently in that Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by amending the Class E airspace for the Rifle, CO, area, by
establishing surface airspace to accommodate IFR aircraft executing a
new RNAV (GPS) approach procedure at Garfield County Regional Airport,
Rifle, CO. This action is necessary for the safety and management of
IFR operations at the airport. This will also change the airport name
from Garfield County Airport to Garfield County Regional Airport.
    The FAA has determined this regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments
are necessary to keep them operationally current. Therefore, this
regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The FAA's authority to
issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the U.S.
Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106 discusses the authority of the FAA
Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency's authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to
ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority as it establishes
additional controlled airspace at Garfield County Regional Airport,
Rifle, CO.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E. O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15,
2009, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6002. Class E airspace designated as surface areas.

* * * * *

ANM CO E2 Rifle, CO [New]

Garfield County Regional Airport, Rifle, CO
    (Lat. 39[deg]31'35'' N., long. 107[deg]43' 37'' W.)

    Within a 4.1-mile radius of Garfield County Regional Airport,
and within 1 mile each side of the 093[deg] bearing extending from
the 4.1-mile radius to 5.5 miles east of the Garfield County
Regional Airport. This Class E airspace area is effective during the
specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Airport/Facility directory.

Paragraph 6005. Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ANM CO E5 Rifle, CO [Amended]

Garfield County Regional Airport, Rifle, CO
    (Lat. 39[deg]31'35'' N., long. 107[deg]43'37'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7-mile radius of the Garfield County Regional Airport, and
within 4.3 miles each side of the 090[deg] bearing from the airport,
extending from the 7-mile radius to 18.3 miles east of the airport,
and within 4.5 miles each side of the 321[deg] bearing from the
airport, extending from the 7-mile radius to 14.5 miles northwest of
the airport.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on March 31, 2010.
Robert E. Henry,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2010-8192 Filed 4-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: March 11, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 48)]
[Notices]
[Page 13066-13067]
[DOCID:fr11mr08-121]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

RTCA Program Management Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Program Management Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of the RTCA Program Management Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 13, 2008 starting at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW.,
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW.,
Suite 850, Washington, DC 20036; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (202)
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., appendix 2), notice
is hereby given for a Program Management Committee meeting. The agenda
will include:

March 13:
    Opening Session (Welcome and Introductory Remarks, Review/Approve
Summary of December 6, 2007 Meeting, Paper No. 021-08/PMC-593)
Publication Consideration/Approval:
    Final Draft, New Document, Minimum Operational Performance
Standards (MOPS) for Helicopter Terrain Awareness and Warning System
(HTAWS) Airborne Equipment, RTCA Paper No. 015-08/PMC-592, prepared by
SC-212
    Final Draft, New Document, Minimum Operational Performance
Standards for Rechargeable Lithium Battery Systems, RTCA Paper 037-OS/
PMC-594, prepared by SC-211
    Final Draft, New Document, Minimum Operational Performance
Standards for GPS Ground-based

Regional Augmentation System Airborne Equipment, RTCA Paper No. 040-08/
PMC-597, prepared by SC-159
    Final Draft, Revised DO-235A, Assessment of Radio Frequency
Interference Relevant to the GNSS LI Frequency Band, RTCA Paper No.
039-07/PMC-595, prepared by SC 159
Discussion:
    Terrain, Obstacle and Aerodrome Mapping Data--Discussion--Possible
New Special Committee
    SC-205--Software Considerations--Presentation
    Department of Homeland Security eLORAN News Release--Discussion
    Special Committee Chairman's Reports
    RICA Annual Awards--Review Nominations
Action Item Review:
    SC-147--Traffic Alert & Collision Avoidance System-Discussion PMC
Ad Hoc Subgroup--Report--New Special Committee Recommendation
    SC-203--Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)--Discussion-Status Review--
PMC Ad Hoc Subgroup--Report
    SC-214--Standards for Air Traffic Data Communications Services--
Discussion--Review/Approve Terms of Reference

Closing Session (Other Business, Document Production, Date and Place of
Next Meeting, Adjourn)

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 14, 2008.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E8-4519 Filed 3-10-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


From: Kissell. Mary@ epamail. epa. gov [ mailto: Kissell. Mary@ epamail. epa. gov] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 10: 36 AM To: Edmond_ Toy@ omb. eop. gov Cc: Chamberlin. Johnb@ epamail. epa. gov; Hustvedt. Ken@ epamail. epa. gov; Clemons. Teresa@ epamail. epa. gov; kphanks@ rti. org Subject: PCWP  AF& PA's Comments ( See attached file: afpa2_ AF& PA Wood MACT Comments FINAL 3 7 03. DOC) Docket Nos. OAR 2003 0048 and A 44 98 The document Comments of the American Forest & Paper Association, Inc.: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Plywood and Composite Wood Products; Proposed Rule; 68 Fed. Reg. 1276 ( January 9, 2003): Volume I ( filename: afpa2_ AF& PA Wood MACT Comments FINAL 3 7 03. DOC) is filed in Docket No. A 44 98, item IV D 27.


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15814-15818]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5172]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0090; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-312-AD;
Amendment 39-16627; AD 2011-06-03]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD requires measuring the electrical bond
resistance between the motor operated valve (MOV) actuators and
airplane structure for the main, center, auxiliary, and horizontal
stabilizer fuel tanks, as applicable, and corrective action if
necessary; revising the maintenance program to incorporate
airworthiness limitation (AWL) No. 28-AWL-21 or AWL No. 28-AWL-27, as
applicable; and replacing production-installed laminate phenolic
spacers with metallic spacers between the fuel jettison MOV and the
airplane structure, as applicable. This AD was prompted by fuel system
reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to
prevent electrical current from flowing through an MOV actuator into a
fuel tank, which could create a potential ignition source inside the
fuel tank. This condition, in combination with flammable fuel vapors,
could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the
airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective April 26, 2011.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of April 26,
2011.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tung Tran, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, ANM-140S,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone: 425-
917-6505; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to
amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that
would apply to the specified products. That SNPRM published in the
Federal Register on November 19, 2010 (75 FR 70863). That SNPRM
proposed to require measuring the electrical bond resistance between
the motor operated valve (MOV) actuators and airplane structure for the
main, center, auxiliary, and horizontal stabilizer fuel tanks, as
applicable, and corrective action if

necessary; revising the maintenance program to incorporate
airworthiness limitation (AWL) No. 28-AWL-21 or AWL No. 28-AWL-27, as
applicable; and replacing production-installed laminate phenolic
spacers with metallic spacers between the fuel jettison MOV and the
airplane structure, as applicable.

Actions Since Supplemental NPRM Was Issued

    Since the supplemental NPRM was issued, Boeing issued Service
Bulletin 747-28A2292, Revision 3, dated December 9, 2010. The changes
described in this service bulletin are minor and editorial in nature.
Paragraphs (c) and (g) of this AD have been revised to refer to
Revision 3 of this service bulletin. In addition, credit for
accomplishing the actions in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28A2292,
Revision 2, dated May 13, 2010, has been included in paragraph (o) of
this AD.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We have considered the comment received. Boeing supports the
NPRM.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD as proposed--except for the changes that were described above. We
have determined that these changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 222 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                          Labor cost                   Parts cost                Cost per product          Cost on U.S. operators
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measurement.........................  Up to 7 work-hours x $85     Up to $350.................  Up to $945.................  Up to $209,790.
                                       per hour = Up to $595.
Replacement (Up to 60 airplanes)....  Up to 4 work-hours x $85     $1,305.....................  Up to $1,645...............  Up to $98,700.
                                       per hour = Up to $340.
Maintenance program revision........  1 work-hour x $85 per hour   $0.........................  $85........................  $18,870.
                                       = $85.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary modification
that would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection.
We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need
this modification.

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Action                      Labor cost               Parts cost               Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change electrical bond and rework   436 work-hours x $85   Up to $35,760.............  Up to $72,820.
 part contact surface.               per hour = $37,060.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2011-06-03 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-16627; Docket No. FAA-
2008-0090; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-312-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD is effective April 26, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-
100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400,
747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes, certificated
in any category; as identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-
28A2292, Revision 3, dated December 9, 2010.

    Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
according to paragraph (q) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the airplane.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD results from fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer. The Federal Aviation Administration is issuing this AD
to prevent electrical current from flowing through a motor operated
valve (MOV) actuator into a fuel tank, which could create a
potential ignition source inside the fuel tank. This condition, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Measurement, Corrective Action, and Replacement

    (g) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions required by paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, as
applicable.
    (1) Measure the electrical bond resistance between the MOV
actuators and the airplane structure for the main, center, and
auxiliary fuel tanks, as applicable; and do all applicable
corrective actions; by accomplishing all of the applicable actions
in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-
28A2292, Revision 3, dated December 9, 2010. The corrective actions
must be accomplished before further flight.
    (2) For airplanes in Groups 12, 16, 17, 18, and 19, as
identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28A2292, Revision 3, dated
December 9, 2010: Within 60 months after the effective date of this
AD, replace production-installed laminate phenolic spacers with
metallic spacers, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28A2292, Revision 3, dated December
9, 2010.
    (h) For airplanes identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-
28A2294, Revision 1, dated March 5, 2009: Within 60 months after the
effective date of this AD, measure the electrical bond resistance
between the MOV actuators and airplane structure for the horizontal
stabilizer fuel tanks (HST), and do all the applicable corrective
actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28A2294, Revision 1, dated March 5,
2009. The corrective actions must be accomplished before further
flight.

Deactivation of the HST

    (i) For airplanes identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-
28A2294, Revision 1, dated March 5, 2009: Deactivation of the HST,
in accordance with the applicable Boeing service information
specified in table 1 of this AD, terminates the requirements of
paragraph (h) of this AD, except as provided by paragraph (j) of
this AD. Deactivation of the HST before the effective date of this
AD in accordance with the applicable service information specified
in table 2 of this AD also terminates the requirements of paragraph
(h) of this AD, except as provided by paragraph (j) of this AD.

                Table 1--Deactivation Service Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Boeing--                   Revision--             Dated--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Bulletin 747-28-2265..  Original..............  February 22,
                                                         2006.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2272..  Original..............  February 21,
                                                         2006.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2274..  1.....................  May 21, 2008.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2275..  4.....................  February 2,
                                                         2009.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2279..  2.....................  October 16,
                                                         2007.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2285..  3.....................  August 30, 2007.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2293..  2.....................  March 4, 2008.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2295..  2.....................  January 19,
                                                         2009.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2296..  Original..............  July 13, 2007.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2300..  1.....................  June 2, 2008.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2314..  Original..............  December 9,
                                                         2008.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            Table 2--Deactivation Credit Service Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Boeing--                   Revision--             Dated--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Bulletin 747-28-2274..  Original..............  March 13, 2006.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2275..  Original..............  June 12, 2006.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2275..  1.....................  March 16, 2007.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2275..  2.....................  July 2, 2007.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2275..  3.....................  March 11, 2008.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2279..  Original..............  June 12, 2006.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2279..  1.....................  May 25, 2007.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2285..  Original..............  January 23,
                                                         2007.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2285..  1.....................  May 9, 2007.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2285..  2.....................  August 3, 2007.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2293..  Original..............  May 9, 2007.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2293..  1.....................  August 29, 2007.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2295..  Original..............  November 17,
                                                         2006.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2295..  1.....................  March 20, 2008.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2300..  Original..............  January 16,
                                                         2008.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reactivation of the HST

    (j) For airplanes identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-
28A2294, Revision 1, dated March 5, 2009, on which the HST is
reactivated, the HST must be reactivated in accordance with a method
approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA. For any airplane on which the HST is reactivated, the
requirements of paragraphs (h) and (l) of this AD must be done
before further flight following the reactivation, or within 60
months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
For a reactivation method to be approved, the reactivation method
must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval
must specifically reference this AD.

Maintenance Program Revision

    (k) For Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-
200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes:
Concurrently with accomplishing the actions required by paragraph
(g)(1) of this AD, revise the maintenance program by incorporating
airworthiness limitation (AWL) No. 28-AWL-21 of Section D of Boeing
747-100/200/300/SP Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and
Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMRs), Document D6-13747-
CMR, Revision March 2008.
    (l) For Model 747-400, 747-400D, and 747-400F series airplanes:
Concurrently with accomplishing the actions required by paragraph
(g)(1) of this AD, revise the maintenance program by incorporating
AWL No. 28-AWL-27 of Subsection D of Boeing 747-400 Maintenance
Planning Data (MPD) Document, Section 9, D621U400-9, Revision
December 2009.

No Alternative Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations
(CDCCLs)

    (m) After accomplishing the applicable action required in
paragraph (k) or (l) of this AD, no alternative CDCCLs may be used
unless the CDCCLs are approved as an AMOC in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (q) of this AD.

Terminating Action for Maintenance Program Revision

    (n) For Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-
200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes:
Incorporating AWL No. 28-AWL-21 into the maintenance program in
accordance with paragraph (g) of AD 2008-10-07, Amendment 39-15513;
or AD 2008-10-07 R1, Amendment 39-16070; terminates the action
required by paragraph (k) of this AD.

Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information

    (o) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-28A2294, dated
September 21, 2007; and Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28A2292,
Revision 2, dated May 13, 2010; are acceptable for compliance with
the corresponding requirements of this AD.

Incorporation of Previous Issues of Airworthiness Limitation (AWL)

    (p) Incorporation of AWL No. 28-AWL-21 of Section D of the
Boeing 747-100/200/300/SP Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and
Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMRs), Document D6-13747-
CMR, Revision January 2007, September 2007, or January 2008, is
acceptable for compliance with the corresponding requirements of
this AD if done before the effective date of this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (q)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person
identified in the Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be e-mailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

Related Information

    (r) For more information about this AD, contact Tung Tran,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, ANM-140S, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-
mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Material Incorporated by Reference

    (s) You must use the applicable service information contained in
table 3 of this AD to do the actions required by this AD, unless the
AD specifies otherwise. If you accomplish the optional terminating
action specified in this AD, you must use the applicable service
information specified in table 4 of this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.

    Table 3--Material Incorporated by Reference for Required Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Document               Revision               Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-              3  December 9, 2010.
 28A2292.
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-              1  March 5, 2009.
 28A2294.
Boeing 747-100/200/300/SP                    March 2008.
 Airworthiness Limitations
 (AWLs) and Certification
 Maintenance Requirements
 (CMRs), Document D6-13747-CMR.
Section 9 of Boeing 747-400                  December 2009.
 Maintenance Planning Data
 (MPD) Document, Section 9,
 D621U400-9.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                   Table 4--Material Incorporated by Reference for Optional Terminating Action
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Boeing--                            Revision--                           Dated--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Bulletin 747-28-2265.............  Original.....................  February 22, 2006.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2272.............  Original.....................  February 21, 2006.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2274.............  1............................  May 21, 2008.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2275.............  4............................  February 2, 2009.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2279.............  2............................  October 16, 2007.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2285.............  3............................  August 30, 2007.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2293.............  2............................  March 4, 2008.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2295.............  2............................  January 19, 2009.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2296.............  Original.....................  July 13, 2007.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2300.............  1............................  June 2, 2008.
Service Bulletin 747-28-2314.............  Original.....................  December 9, 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.

    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 23, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-5172 Filed 3-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: May 11, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 89)]
[Notices]
[Page 21839]
[DOCID:fr11my09-593]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Thursday, May 14,
2009 at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:
    The Commission will consider custody-related matters, including
whether to propose amendments to rule 206(4)-2 under the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940 and related forms and rules. The proposed
amendments would enhance the protections provided advisory clients when
they entrust their funds and securities to an investment adviser. If
adopted, the amendments would require investment advisers having
custody of client funds and securities to obtain a surprise examination
by an independent public accountant, and, unless the client assets are
maintained with an independent custodian, obtain a review of custodial
controls from an independent public accountant.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 7, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-11077 Filed 5-7-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


Description / Abstract: This Standard applies to the preparation of SDSs and precautionary labeling for hazardous chemicals used under occupational conditions. It presents basic information on how to develop and write SDSs and precautionary labels. It also identifies information that must be included to comply with the HCS. Additional information is provided to help comply with state and federal environmental and safety laws and regulations. Elements of this Standard may also be acceptable for international use. This Standard is not intended to address the distribution of SDSs.

This Standard is not intended to provide a rote specification for complying with the HCS or any other government requirements. Safety data sheet and precautionary labeling requirements and definitions are subject to change. It is the responsibility of the SDS and label preparer to be aware of current HCS requirements.

This Standard must be applied in a manner consistent with all statutory and regulatory requirements, including the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard (HCS; 29 CFR 1910.1200) and the substance specific standards (29 CFR 1910.1001-1052).

There are use-specific statutory and regulatory requirements for some chemical products that are outside the scope of OSHA HCS and therefore may have different SDS and/or labeling requirements. Some examples include:

:: consumer products regulated by the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA),

:: medical products regulated by the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),

:: pesticides regulated by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA),

:: materials in transportation regulated by the Department of Transportation (DOT) Hazardous Materials Regulations, and

:: laboratory chemicals regulated under 29 CFR 1910.1450, the "OSHA Laboratory Standard".

See 29 CFR 1910.1200(b) for information on the scope and application of the HCS.

For example, a company that manufactures aspirin tablets does not need to produce and distribute SDSs to individuals that are taking aspirin to treat pain or some other medical condition. This includes aspirin tablets taken by a worker in the workplace. In this scenario, the aspirin would fall under the jurisdiction of the FDA, not OSHA. However, the company would be required to produce OSHA hazard communication documents (such as an SDS and labels) for workers who may be exposed to aspirin powder during the manufacture of the tablets.

It is not the intent of this Standard to substitute for specific regulatory requirements or to list each and every unique requirement. Where there is a conflict between the applicable regulations and this Standard, the regulations must take precedence over this Standard. References to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in the Standard are to the January 1, 2009 edition of the CFR.

Purpose

The purpose of this Standard is to provide:

:: a common and consistent approach for assessing chemical hazards;

:: a framework to communicate useful and understandable information on hazardous workplace chemicals;

:: an SDS format that will allow inclusion of information to comply with applicable laws; and

:: guidance for the preparation of precautionary labeling.

This Standard is based on two general principles. Foremost, SDSs and precautionary labeling should provide sufficient information for the safe handling of the chemical. The precautionary information should be based on the inherent properties of the chemical and include recommendations on how to avoid potentially hazardous exposures resulting from customary and reasonably foreseeable occupational use, misuse, handling and storage.

Second, the precautionary information should neither overstate nor minimize the hazards or precautions for the chemical. Some chemicals may not be inherently hazardous and do not present a potential for harm in customary or reasonably foreseeable occupational use, misuse, handling and storage. For these chemicals, SDSs and precautionary labeling may not be necessary.


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9009-9012]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3455]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC11-40-000.
    Applicants: Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
    Description: Application of Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. for
an order pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5137.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1809-002.
    Applicants: RED-Scotia, LLC.
    Description: Notification of Change in Facts Under Market-Based
Rate Authority of RED-Scotia, LLC.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5154.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3269-001.
    Applicants: West Oaks Energy LP.
    Description: West Oaks Energy LP submits tariff filing per 35: West
Oaks Energy, LP, FERC Electric MBR Tariff No. 1 to be effective 2/4/
2011.
    Filed Date: 02/07/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110207-5002.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 28, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3311-001.
    Applicants: BJ Energy, LLC.
    Description: BJ Energy, LLC submits tariff filing per 35: BJ
Energy, LLC, FERC Electric MBR Tariff No. 1 to be effective 2/4/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/07/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110207-5000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 28, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3312-001.
    Applicants: Pure Energy Inc.
    Description: Pure Energy Inc. submits tariff filing per 35: Pure
Energy, Compliance File Baseline LLC to be effective 9/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5125.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3315-001.
    Applicants: Indeck-Oswego Limited Partnership.
    Description: Indeck-Oswego Limited Partnership submits tariff
filing per 35: Indeck-Oswego, Limited Partnership, FERC Electric MBR
Tariff No. 1 to be effective 2/4/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/07/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110207-5001.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 28, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3316-001.
    Applicants: Indeck Energy Services of Silver Springs.
    Description: Indeck Energy Services of Silver Springs Inc. submits
tariff filing per 35: Indeck Energy Services of Silver Springs, Inc.,
FERC Electric MBR Tariff No. 1 to be effective 2/4/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5135.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3320-001.

    Applicants: MAG Energy Solutions Inc.
    Description: MAG Energy Solutions Inc. submits tariff filing per
35: MAG Energy Solutions, Inc., FERC Electric MBR Tariff No. 1 to be
effective 2/4/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5136.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3323-001.
    Applicants: Indeck-Olean Limited Partnership.
    Description: Indeck-Olean Limited Partnership submits tariff filing
per 35: Indeck-Olean Compliance File Baseline FERC Electric MBR Tariff
No. 1 to be effective 9/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 02/07/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110207-5003.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 28, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3324-001.
    Applicants: Indeck-Yerkes Limited Partnership.
    Description: Indeck-Yerkes Limited Partnership submits tariff
filing per 35: Indeck-Yerkes, Compliance File Baseline FERC Electric
MBR Tariff No. 1 to be effective 9/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5123.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3325-001.
    Applicants: SESCO CALISO.
    Description: SESCO CALISO submits tariff filing per 35: SESCO
CALISO, LLC, Comp Filing to Baseline FERC Electric Tariff Schedule No.
1 to be effective 9/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5128.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3326-001.
    Applicants: SESCO Enterprises LLC.
    Description: SESCO Enterprises LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
SESCO Enterprises, LLC Comp Filing to baseline FERC Elec Tariff Sched
No. 1 to be effective 9/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5129.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3327-001.
    Applicants: Jump Power LLC.
    Description: Jump Power LLC submits tariff filing per 35: Jump
Power Compliance File Baseline FERC Electric MBR Tariff No. 1 to be
effective 9/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5124.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3328-001.
    Applicants: SESCO Enterprises Canada Ltd.
    Description: SESCO Enterprises Canada Ltd. submits tariff filing
per 35: SESCO Enterpr Comp Filing to Baseline FERC Elec Tariff Sched
No. 1 to be effective 9/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5119.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3329-001.
    Applicants: Round Rock Energy LP.
    Description: Round Rock Energy LP submits tariff filing per 35:
Round Rock Energy, LP Comp Filing Baseline FERC Electric Tariff Sched
No. 1 to be effective 9/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5127.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3330-001.
    Applicants: Round Rock Energy LLC.
    Description: Round Rock Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Round Rock Energy, LLC Comp Filing to Baseline FERC Elec Tariff Sched
No. 1 to be effective 9/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5126.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3331-001.
    Applicants: West Oaks Energy NY/NE, LP.
    Description: West Oaks Energy NY/NE, LP submits tariff filing per
35: W Oaks Energy LP Comp Filing to Baseline FERC Electric Tariff Sched
No. 1 to be effective 9/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5131.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-5-001.
    Applicants: Great Bay Energy, LLC.
    Description: Great Bay Energy, LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Great Bay Energy Compliance File Baseline FERC Electric Tariff Schedule
No. 1 to be effective 9/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5121.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-6-001.
    Applicants: Great Bay Energy I LLC.
    Description: Great Bay Energy I LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Great Bay Energy I Compliance File Baseline FERC Electric Tariff Sched
No. 1 to be effective 9/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5133.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2053-001.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits tariff filing per 35: 02-04-11 Interface Pricing Compliance to
be effective 11/9/2010.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5120.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2375-001.
    Applicants: Consolidated Edison Company of New York.
    Description: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. submits
tariff filing per 35: Supplemental Information Order 697 Compliance
Filing to be effective 2/4/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5039.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2376-001.
    Applicants: Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
    Description: Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. submits tariff
filing per 35: Supplemental Information Order 697 Compliance Filing to
be effective 1/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5132.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2378-001.
    Applicants: Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc.
    Description: Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc. submits tariff filing
per 35: Supplemental Information Order 697 Compliance Filing to be
effective 1/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/07/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110207-5005.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 28, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2379-001.
    Applicants: Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc.
    Description: Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc. submits tariff
filing per 35: Supplemental Information Order 697 Compliance Filing to
be effective 1/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/07/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110207-5006.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 28, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2607-001; ER11-2598-001; ER11-2612-001.
    Applicants: Sempra Energy Trading LLC, MxEnergy Electric Inc.,
Gateway Energy Services Corporation.
    Description: Supplemental to Notice of Category 1 Seller Status of
Sempra Energy Trading LLC, et al.

    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5138.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2607-002.
    Applicants: Sempra Energy Trading LLC.
    Description: Sempra Energy Trading LLC submits tariff filing per
35: SET Revised Category 1 Status re MBR Tariff to be effective 3/4/
2011.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5055.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2649-001.
    Applicants: 3C Solar LLC.
    Description: 3C Solar LLC submits tariff filing per 35: 3C Solar
LLC Revised MBR Tariff to be effective 3/8/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5037.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2833-000.
    Applicants: California Pacific Electric Company, LLC.
    Description: California Pacific Electric Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 35.15: Cancellation of CalPeco Filing to be effective
12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5043.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2834-000.
    Applicants: California Pacific Electric Company, LLC.
    Description: California Pacific Electric Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 35.15: Cancellation of Baseline Tariff for DCA and
BCA to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5044.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2835-000.
    Applicants: California Pacific Electric Company, LLC.
    Description: California Pacific Electric Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 35.15: Cancellation of CalPeco Rate Schedule No. 5 to
be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5052.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2836-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Pacific Gas and Electric Company submits tariff filing
per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Small Generator Interconnection Agreement for
PG&E's Stroud Solar Station to be effective 2/7/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5053.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2837-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2151 TPW Petersburg, LLC GIA to be effective 1/5/
2011.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5054.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2838-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Mexico.
    Description: Public Service Company of New Mexico submits tariff
filing per 35.13(a)(1): Change to Operating Procedure 9 to be effective
6/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5058.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2839-000.
    Applicants: California Pacific Electric Company, LLC.
    Description: California Pacific Electric Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 35.1: EBSA BCA DCA RSA ESA to be effective 2/4/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5099.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2840-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): ISA No. 2774, Queue Nos. V1-033 and W1-033, Energy
Answers and BG&E to be effective 1/5/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5122.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2841-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): WMPA No. 2723, Queue No. W2-052, PSE&G and PSE&G to
be effective 1/13/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5134.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2842-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator, Inc. submits
tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): NYISO 205 Filing--Interconnection
Study Cost Allocation to be effective 3/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/07/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110207-5025.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 28, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2843-000.
    Applicants: Oak Creek Wind Power, LLC.
    Description: Oak Creek Wind Power, LLC submits tariff filing per
35: Oak Creek Wind Power, LLC First Revised MBR Tariff to be effective
2/8/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/07/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110207-5055.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 28, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2844-000.
    Applicants: Adagio Energy LLC.
    Description: Adagio Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35.1:
Baseline 714 compliance to be effective 4/4/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/07/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110207-5102.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 28, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES11-18-000.
    Applicants: Rockland Electric Company.
    Description: Application of Rockland Electric Company for an order
pursuant to Section 204 of the Federal Power Act.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5093.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 25, 2011.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic

service, persons with Internet access who will eFile a document and/or
be listed as a contact for an intervenor must create and validate an
eRegistration account using the eRegistration link. Select the eFiling
link to log on and submit the intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 7, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-3455 Filed 2-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78677-78678]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26906]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-79220; File No. SR-ICC-2016-010]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change To Revise the ICC Risk Management Model
Description Document and the ICC Risk Management Framework

November 2, 2016

I. Introduction

    On July 15, 2016, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICC'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to revise the ICC
Risk Management Framework to incorporate changes to the single name
credit default swap (``CDS'') liquidity charge methodology and make
additional minor, clarifying changes (SR-ICC-2016-010). The proposed
rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on August
4, 2016.\3\ On September 15, 2016, the Commission extended the time
period in which to either approve, disapprove, or institute proceedings
to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change to November
2, 2016.\4\ The Commission did not receive comments on the proposed
rule change. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is
approving the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-78448 (July 29,
2016), 81 FR 51532 (Aug. 4, 2016) (SR-ICC-2016-010).
    \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-78846 (Sept. 15,
2016), 81 FR 64574 (Sept. 20, 2016) (SR-ICC-2016-010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

    ICC proposes revising the ICC Risk Management Framework to
incorporate certain risk model enhancements related to its single name
CDS liquidity charge methodology. ICC also proposes minor clarifying
edits to the ICC Risk Management Model Description document and the ICC
Risk Management Framework. These revisions do not require any changes
to the ICC Clearing Rules.
    Specifically, ICC proposes to introduce minimum instrument
liquidity requirements independent of instrument maturities. ICC's
current approach features instrument liquidity requirements that decay
with time to maturity for fixed credit spread levels. The proposed
approach introduces minimum liquidity requirements for individual
instruments, independent of time to maturity for the considered
instruments. ICC believes the proposal thus establishes minimum
liquidity charges that do not decay over time as maturity is
approached. The revised calculation for single name CDS liquidity
charges at the instrument level will incorporate a price-based bid-
offer width (``BOW'') floor component, which ICC asserts will provide
stability of requirements, as well as a dynamic spread-based BOW
component, which ICC asserts will reflect the additional risk
associated with distressed market conditions. The values of such price-
based BOW and spread-based BOW will be fixed factors, which will be
subject to at least monthly reviews and updates by ICC Risk Management
Department with consultation with the Risk Committee.
    ICC also proposes enhancements to the liquidity charge calculation
at the risk factor level. ICC's current risk factor level liquidity
requirements are based on forward CDS spread levels. Under the revised
calculation, liquidity charges at the risk factor level will be
computed by first calculating the liquidity requirements for each
individual instrument position in the portfolio, and then summing all
instrument liquidity requirements for positions with the same
directionality, i.e. bought or sold protection. The risk factor
liquidity requirement will be the greatest liquidity requirement
associated with either the sum of all bought protection position
liquidity requirements, or the sum of all sold protection position
liquidity requirements. ICC is not proposing any changes to the
liquidity charge calculation at the portfolio level. ICC expects these
enhancements will ensure more stable liquidity requirements for
instruments across the curve and simplify ICC's liquidity charge
methodology, which ICC believes should promote ease of understanding.
In ICC's view, the current risk factor level liquidity requirements,
based on forward CDS spread levels, are, in general, more difficult to
replicate due

to the need for knowledge of spread levels across the entire term
structure.
    Additionally, to facilitate replication of the enhanced liquidity
charge calculations, ICC will provide end-of-day data for instruments
in which clients have open positions, allowing for additional
transparency and easier replication for clients who wish to estimate
liquidity charges for hypothetical and current positions.
    ICC also proposes updating liquidity scaling factors to reflect the
methodology enhancements. There is no price based component under the
current methodology. To reflect the introduction of a price based
component, the liquidity scaling factors will be decomposed and
adjusted in order to maintain the same overall composition with both
price and spread based components.
    ICC has also proposed minor clarifying edits to the ICC Risk
Management Framework and the ICC Risk Management Model Description
document. ICC will add language to the Overview section of the Risk
Management Framework to identify which ICC documents provide additional
details regarding ICC's risk management approach. ICC will add language
to the Governance and Organization section of the Risk Management
Framework to note that the reporting line of ICC's Chief Risk Officer
to the Chairperson of the ICC Risk Committee, who is also a non-
executive manager on the Board, allows the Chief Risk Officer to bring
any issues or concerns directly to the Board without intermediation by
other ICC personnel. ICC will also make edits to the Governance and
Organization section of the Risk Management Framework to revise the
list of documents reviewed by the Risk Committee on at least an annual
basis to include the ICC End-of-Day Price Discovery Policies and
Procedures and the ICC Operational Risk Management Framework. Finally,
ICC will add minor clarifying details to the technical calculation
descriptions set forth in the ICC Risk Management Model Description
document, specifically in the Recovery Rate Sensitivity Risk Analysis,
Interest Rate Sensitivity Risk Analysis, Spread Risk Analysis, and
Guaranty Fund Size Estimation sections.

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \5\ directs the Commission to
approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if the
Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such self-regulatory organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F)
of the Act \6\ requires, among other things, that the rules of a
clearing agency are designed to promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent
applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions and to
comply with the provisions of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \7\ and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to ICC. ICC asserts that the proposed
change will simplify its initial margin methodology and lead to more
stable initial margin requirements. The Commission believes that ICC's
proposed revisions to the ICC Risk Management Framework and the ICC
Risk Model Description Document, including the introduction of minimum
liquidity requirements for the relevant instruments that do not decay
over time and therefore are independent of instrument maturities, are
reasonably designed to meet the margin and financial resource
requirements of Rule 17Ad-22(b)(2-3).\8\ In addition, the Commission
believes that the revised methodology should assist market participants
clearing or deciding whether to clear instruments through ICC to
estimate liquidity charges for hypothetical and current positions. This
enhancement in transparency is consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(d)(9),\9\
which requires clearing agencies to establish, implement, maintain, and
enforce policies and procedures reasonably designed to provide market
participants with sufficient information for them to identify and
evaluate the risks and costs associated with using its service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(2-3).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in
particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \10\ and the
rules and regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\11\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-ICC-2016-010) be,
and hereby is, approved.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \12\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-26906 Filed 11-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P