[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 216 (Thursday, November 7, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60130-60132]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24257]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-87445; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2019-060]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order Instituting Proceedings
To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change,
as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Amend Rules 4120 and 4753

November 1, 2019.

I. Introduction

    On July 18, 2019, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Exchange'' or
``Nasdaq'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend Rules 4120 and 4753 to permit the
Exchange to declare a regulatory halt in a security that traded in the
over-the-counter (``OTC'') market prior to the initial pricing on the
Exchange and to allow for the initial pricing of such a security
through the IPO Cross. The proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on August 6, 2019.\3\ On September 19,
2019, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\ the Commission
designated a longer period within which to approve the proposed rule
change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings
to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change.\5\ On
September 19, 2019, the Exchange also filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change, which amended and superseded the proposed rule
change as originally filed.\6\ The Commission received no comment
letters on the proposed rule change. The Commission is publishing this
notice and order to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1, from interested persons and to institute
proceedings pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \7\ to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified
by Amendment No. 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86537 (July 31,
2019), 84 FR 38321.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87012, 84 FR 50490
(September 25, 2019). The Commission designated November 4, 2019 as
the date by which the Commission shall approve or disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the
proposed rule change.
    \6\ In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange revised the proposal to:
(1) Clarify that when a security previously traded in the OTC market
is initially priced using the IPO Cross, the fourth tie-breaker for
each of the Current Reference Price disseminated in the Nasdaq Order
Imbalance Indicator and the price at which the cross will occur will
be the price that is closest to the most recent transaction price in
the OTC market; (2) specify that, for purposes of this proposed rule
change, the use of the term ``regulatory halt'' refers to Nasdaq's
authority to halt trading in a security under Rule 4120(a)(7); (3)
clarify that, currently, a security that traded in the OTC market
immediately prior to listing on Nasdaq is released for initial
trading on Nasdaq through the Opening Cross under Rule 4752(d) and,
pursuant to the proposal, if such an issuer does not retain a
financial advisor, the initial pricing will continue to be effected
through the Opening Cross; (4) include additional justification in
support of the proposed rule change; and (5) make technical and
conforming changes. Amendment No. 1 is available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasdaq-2019-060/srnasdaq2019060-6163792-192369.pdf.
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    Currently, a security that traded in the OTC market immediately
prior to listing on the Exchange is released for initial trading on the
Exchange by utilizing the Opening Cross pursuant to Rule

4752(d).\8\ The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 4120 to permit the
Exchange to declare a regulatory halt \9\ in a security that traded in
the OTC market prior to its initial pricing on the Exchange.\10\ The
Exchange also proposes to amend Rules 4120 and 4753 to allow for the
initial pricing on the Exchange of such a security through the IPO
Cross (described in Rules 4120(c)(8) and 4753) if a broker-dealer
serving in the role of financial advisor to the issuer is willing to
perform the functions under Rule 4120(c)(8) that are performed by an
underwriter in an initial public offering.\11\ If the issuer does not
retain a financial advisor, the initial pricing on the Exchange of such
a security will continue to be effected through the Opening Cross.\12\
Moreover, the Exchange proposes to adopt Rules 4753(a)(3)(A)(iv)(e) and
4753(b)(2)(D)(v) to provide that, in the case of the initial pricing of
a security that traded in the OTC market pursuant to FINRA Form 211
immediately prior to its initial pricing, the fourth tie-breaker used
in calculating each of the Current Reference Price disseminated in the
Nasdaq Order Imbalance Indicator for purposes of the IPO Cross and the
price at which the IPO Cross will occur will be the price that is
closest to the most recent transaction price in the OTC market.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Amendment 1, supra note 6, at 4 n.4.
    \9\ For purposes of this proposed rule change, the term
``regulatory halt'' refers to Nasdaq's authority to halt trading in
a security under Rule 4120(a)(7). See id. at 4 n.3.
    \10\ The Exchange states that its proposal would facilitate a
more orderly start to trading by permitting the Exchange to declare
a regulatory halt in a security that traded in the OTC market prior
to its initial pricing on the Exchange, before trading on the
Exchange begins, which the Exchange believes would avoid potential
price disparities or anomalies that may occur during any unlisted
trading privileges (``UTP'') trading before the first transaction on
the primary listing exchange. See id. at 7.
    \11\ Rule 4120(c)(9) currently provides that the IPO Cross
process is available for the initial pricing of a security that has
not been listed on a national securities exchange or traded in the
OTC market pursuant to FINRA Form 211 immediately prior to the
initial pricing where a broker-dealer serving in the role of
financial advisor to the issuer is willing to perform the functions
under Rule 4120(c)(8) that are performed by an underwriter with
respect to an initial public offering. The Exchange states that the
IPO Cross will be a better mechanism to open trading in securities
that traded in the OTC market given that these companies may attract
significant interest upon listing on the Exchange from investors who
previously could not invest in such securities, and that it will be
beneficial to allow significant financial advisor involvement in
determining when to launch trading. See id. at 8-9.
    \12\ See id. at 4 n.4.
    \13\ The Exchange states that the most recent transaction price
in the OTC market is predictive of the price that will develop upon
the listing of the security on the Exchange. See id. at 8. This
proposed change to the fourth tie-breaker will not affect the
pricing of a security if the issuer does not retain a financial
advisor. See id. at 4 n.5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove SR-
NASDAQ-2019-060, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, and Grounds for
Disapproval Under Consideration

    The Commission is instituting proceedings pursuant to Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \14\ to determine whether the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, should be approved or
disapproved. Institution of proceedings is appropriate at this time in
view of the legal and policy issues raised by the proposal, as
discussed below. Institution of proceedings does not indicate that the
Commission has reached any conclusions with respect to any of the
issues involved. Rather, as described below, the Commission seeks and
encourages interested persons to provide additional comment on the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act,\15\ the Commission is
providing notice of the grounds for disapproval under consideration.
The Commission is instituting proceedings to allow for additional
analysis of, and input from commenters with respect to, the consistency
of the proposal with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.\16\ Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act requires that the rules of a national securities exchange be
designed, among other things, to promote just and equitable principles
of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free
and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Id.
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed above, the proposal would allow the Exchange to
declare a regulatory halt in a security that traded in the OTC market
prior to its initial pricing on the Exchange. The proposal would also
allow the Exchange to use the IPO Cross to initially price such a
security provided that a broker-dealer serving in the role of financial
advisor to the issuer is willing to perform the functions under Rule
4120(c)(8) that are performed by an underwriter with respect to an
initial public offering, and would establish the fourth tie-breaker
used in calculating the Current Reference Price and the IPO Cross
price. Currently, the functions performed by an underwriter with
respect to an initial public offering under Rule 4120(c)(8) include,
for example, providing notice to the Exchange that the security is
ready to trade, selecting price bands for the price validation test,
and determining to postpone and reschedule the initial public offering.
The underwriter functions under Rule 4120(c)(8) currently also apply to
a broker-dealer serving in the role of financial advisor to the issuer
of a security that has not been listed on a national securities
exchange or traded in the OTC market pursuant to FINRA Form 211
immediately prior to its initial pricing on the Exchange, if the IPO
Cross is used for the initial pricing of such a security on the
Exchange. In the current proposal, the Exchange states that the IPO
Cross will be a better mechanism to open trading in securities that
traded in the OTC market given that these companies may attract
significant interest upon listing on the Exchange from investors who
previously could not invest in a security that was traded in the OTC
market, and it would be beneficial to allow significant financial
advisor involvement in determining when to launch trading.\17\ The
Commission seeks commenters' views on the sufficiency and merit of the
Exchange's statements in support of the proposal, which are set forth
in Amendment No. 1,\18\ in addition to any other comments they may wish
to submit about the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Amendment 1, supra note 6, at 8-9.
    \18\ See Amendment 1, supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Procedure: Request for Written Comments

    The Commission requests that interested persons provide written
submissions of their data, views, and arguments with respect to the
issues identified above, as well as any other concerns they may have
with the proposal. In particular, the Commission invites the written
views of interested persons concerning whether the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) or any other provision of the Act, or the rules and regulations
thereunder. Although there does not appear to be any issues relevant to
approval or disapproval which would be facilitated by an oral
presentation of data, views, and arguments, the Commission will
consider, pursuant to Rule 19b-4 under the Act,\19\ any request for an
opportunity to make an oral presentation.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \20\ Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, as amended by the Securities
Acts Amendments of 1975, Public Law 94-29 (June 4, 1975), grants to
the Commission flexibility to determine what type of proceeding--
either oral or notice and opportunity for written comments--is
appropriate for consideration of a particular proposal by a self-
regulatory organization. See Securities Acts Amendments of 1975,
Senate Comm. on Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs, S. Rep. No. 75,
94th Cong., 1st Sess. 30 (1975).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments regarding whether the proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1, should be approved or disapproved by November 29,
2019. Any person who wishes to file a rebuttal to any other person's
submission must file that rebuttal by December 12, 2019.
    Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-NASDAQ-2019-060 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NASDAQ-2019-060. The file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR-NASDAQ-2019-060 and should be submitted by
November 29, 2019. Rebuttal comments should be submitted by December
12, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12); 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-24257 Filed 11-6-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24769-24770]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11060]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection:
Representatives of the Administrator

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew a previously approved
information collection. The collection of information is for the
purpose of obtaining essential information concerning the applicant's
professional and personal qualifications. The FAA uses the information
provided to screen and select designees who act as representatives of
the FAA Administrator in performing various certification and
examination functions under Title VI of Federal Aviation Act.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by June 29, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of
Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronda Thompson by email at:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0033.
    Title: Representatives of the Administrator.
    Form Numbers: FAA Forms 8110-14, 8110-28, 8520-2, 8710-6, 8710-10.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the following collection of information
was published on March 14, 2017 (82 FR 13709). There were no comments.
Title 49, United States Code, Section 44702 authorizes the appointment
of appropriately qualified persons to be representatives of the
Administrator to allow those persons to examine, test and certify other
persons for the purpose of issuing them pilot and instructor
certificates. The collection of information is for the purpose of
obtaining essential information concerning the applicant's professional
and personal qualifications. The FAA uses the information provided to
screen and select designees who act as representatives of the FAA
Administrator in performing various certification and examination
functions under Title VI of Federal Aviation Act.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.
    Respondents: Approximately 4515 applicants.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 1.5 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 6,623 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 24, 2017.
Ronda L. Thompson,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, Performance, Policy &
Records Management Branch, ASP-110.
[FR Doc. 2017-11060 Filed 5-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68871-68872]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27325]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 102, SEC File No. 270-409, OMB Control No. 3235-0467.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in Rule 102 of Regulation M (17
CFR 242.102), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a
et seq.). The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of
information to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') for
extension and approval.
    Rule 102--Activities by Issuers and Selling Security Holders During
a Distribution--prohibits distribution participants, issuers, and
selling security holders from purchasing activities at specified times
during a distribution of securities. Persons otherwise covered by these
rules may seek to use several applicable exceptions such as exclusion
for actively traded reference securities and the maintenance of
policies regarding information barriers between their affiliates.
    There are approximately 945 respondents per year that require an
aggregate total of 1,845 hours to comply with this rule. Each
respondent makes an estimated 1 annual response. Each response takes on
average approximately 1.952 hours to complete. Thus, the total
compliance burden per year is 1,845 burden hours. The total compliance
cost for the respondents is approximately $116,235.00, resulting in a
cost of compliance for the respondent per response of approximately
$123.00 (i.e., $116,235.00/945 responses). These are internal labor
costs and there are no other costs.

    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: Thomas Bayer, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: November 8, 2013.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-27325 Filed 11-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53885-53889]
[FR Doc No: 2023-16971]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP23-507-000]

Equitrans, L.P.; Notice of Scoping Period Requesting Comments on
Environmental Issues for the Proposed Swarts and Hunters Cave Well
Replacement Project

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental document, that will discuss
the environmental impacts of the Swarts and Hunters Cave Well
Replacement Project involving abandonment, construction, and operation
of facilities by Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans) in Greene County,
Pennsylvania. The Commission will use this environmental document in
its decision-making process to determine whether the project is in the
public convenience and necessity.
    This notice announces the opening of the scoping process the
Commission will use to gather input from the public and interested
agencies regarding the project. As part of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) review process, the Commission takes into account
concerns the public may have about proposals and the environmental
impacts that could result from its action whenever it considers the
issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. This
gathering of public input is referred to as ``scoping.'' The main goal
of the scoping process is to focus the analysis in the environmental
document on the important environmental issues. Additional information
about the Commission's NEPA process is described below in the NEPA
Process and Environmental Document section of this notice.
    By this notice, the Commission requests public comments on the
scope of issues to address in the environmental document. To ensure
that your comments are timely and properly recorded, please submit your
comments so that the Commission receives them in Washington, DC on or
before 5:00pm Eastern Time on September 1, 2023. Further details on how
to submit comments are provided in the Public Participation section of
this notice.
    Your comments should focus on the potential environmental effects,
reasonable alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental
impacts. Your input will help the Commission staff determine what
issues they need to evaluate in the environmental document. Commission
staff will consider all written comments during the preparation of the
environmental document.
    If you submitted comments on this project to the Commission before
the opening of this docket on June 30, 2023, you will need to file
those comments in Docket No. CP23-507-000 to ensure they are considered
as part of this proceeding.
    This notice is being sent to the Commission's current environmental
mailing list for this project. State and local government
representatives should notify their constituents of this proposed
project and encourage them to comment on their areas of concern.

    If you are a landowner receiving this notice, a pipeline company
representative may contact you about the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the proposed facilities. The company
would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable easement agreement. You
are not required to enter into an agreement. However, if the Commission
approves the project, the Natural Gas Act conveys the right of eminent
domain to the company. Therefore, if you and the company do not reach
an easement agreement, the pipeline company could initiate condemnation
proceedings in court. In such instances, compensation would be
determined by a judge in accordance with state law. The Commission does
not subsequently grant, exercise, or oversee the exercise of that
eminent domain authority. The courts have exclusive authority to handle
eminent domain cases; the Commission has no jurisdiction over these
matters.
    Equitrans provided landowners with a fact sheet prepared by the
FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural Gas Facility On My Land? What Do
I Need To Know?'' which addresses typically asked questions, including
the use of eminent domain and how to participate in the Commission's
proceedings. This fact sheet along with other landowner topics of
interest are available for viewing on the FERC website (www.ferc.gov)
under the Natural Gas, Landowner Topics link.

Public Participation

    There are three methods you can use to submit your comments to the
Commission. Please carefully follow these instructions so that your
comments are properly recorded. The Commission encourages electronic
filing of comments and has staff available to assist you at (866) 208-
3676 or [email protected].
    (1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature, which is located on the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov)
under the link to FERC Online. Using eComment is an easy method for
submitting brief, text-only comments on a project;
    (2) You can file your comments electronically by using the eFiling
feature, which is located on the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov)
under the link to FERC Online. With eFiling, you can provide comments
in a variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your
submission. New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking
on ``eRegister.'' You will be asked to select the type of filing you
are making; a comment on a particular project is considered a ``Comment
on a Filing''; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the Commission. Be sure to reference the project docket number (CP23-
507-000) on your letter. Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service
must be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC
20426. Submissions sent via any other carrier must be addressed to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Additionally, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which makes it easy to stay informed of all issuances and
submittals regarding the dockets/projects to which you subscribe. These
instant email notifications are the fastest way to receive notification
and provide a link to the document files which can reduce the amount of
time you spend researching proceedings. Go to https://www.ferc.gov/ferc-online/overview to register for eSubscription.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners,
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is
encouraged to contact OPP at<PHONE_NUMBER> or [email protected].

Summary of the Proposed Project

    Equitrans proposes to abandon, construct and operate certain
facilities within the Swarts Complex and Hunters Cave Storage Fields in
Greene County, Pennsylvania. According to Equitrans, the Swarts and
Hunters Cave Well Replacement Project is necessary because of planned
mining activity from CONSOL Pennsylvania Coal Company LLC (CONSOL).
According to Pennsylvania state law, any active storage well within
2,000 feet of active mining activities would need to be plugged or
upgraded to current mining standards.
    The Swarts and Hunters Cave Well Replacement Project would consist
of the following facilities:
     abandonment by-sale of a series of 19 injection/withdrawal
wells at Equitrans' Hunters Cave Storage Field abandonment in-place of
the associated well pipelines and any associated facilities;
     construction and operation of a new horizontal well,
associated pipelines, and ancillary facilities at the Hunters Cave
Storage Field;
     construction and operation of a new horizontal well,
associated pipelines, and ancillary facilities at the Swarts Complex;
     expansions of the existing Morris Interconnect and Pierce
Gates Valve Yards at the Hunters Cave Storage Field;
     acquisition of non-jurisdictional gathering assets from
EQM Gathering Opco, LLC (pipelines and related equipment) for operation
of the new Swarts Horizontal Storage Well; and
     the sale of 580 million cubic feet of base gas from the
Swarts Complex.
    The general location of the project facilities is shown in appendix
1.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The appendices referenced in this notice will not appear in
the Federal Register. Copies of the appendices were sent to all
those receiving this notice in the mail and are available at
www.ferc.gov using the link called ``eLibrary''. For instructions on
connecting to eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice. At
this time, the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's
Public Reference Room. For assistance, contact FERC at
[email protected] or call toll free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY
(202) 502-8659.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Land Requirements for Construction

    Construction of the Swarts and Hunters Cave Well Replacement
Project would disturb about 77.86 acres of land in Greene County,
Pennsylvania. Following construction, Equitrans would maintain about
12.4 acres for permanent operation of the project's facilities; the
remaining acreage would be restored and revert to former uses.

NEPA Process and the Environmental Document

    Any environmental document issued by the Commission will discuss
impacts that could occur as a result of the construction and operation
of the proposed project under the relevant general resource areas:

 geology and soils;
 water resources and wetlands;
 vegetation and wildlife;
 threatened and endangered species;
 cultural resources;
 land use;
 environmental justice;
 socioeconomics;
 air quality and noise; and
 reliability and safety.

    Commission staff will also evaluate reasonable alternatives to the
proposed project or portions of the project and make recommendations on
how to lessen or avoid impacts on the various resource areas. Your
comments will help Commission staff identify and

focus on the issues that might have an effect on the human environment
and potentially eliminate others from further study and discussion in
the environmental document.
    Following this scoping period, Commission staff will determine
whether to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) or an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS). The EA or the EIS will present Commission
staff's independent analysis of the issues. If Commission staff
prepares an EA, a Notice of Schedule for the Preparation of an
Environmental Assessment will be issued. The EA may be issued for an
allotted public comment period. The Commission would consider timely
comments on the EA before making its decision regarding the proposed
project. If Commission staff prepares an EIS, a Notice of Intent to
Prepare an EIS/Notice of Schedule will be issued, which will open up an
additional comment period. Staff will then prepare a draft EIS which
will be issued for public comment. Commission staff will consider all
timely comments received during the comment period on the draft EIS and
revise the document, as necessary, before issuing a final EIS. Any EA
or draft and final EIS will be available in electronic format in the
public record through eLibrary \2\ and the Commission's natural gas
environmental documents web page (https://www.ferc.gov/industries-data/natural-gas/environment/environmental-documents). If eSubscribed, you
will receive instant email notification when the environmental document
is issued.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ For instructions on connecting to eLibrary, refer to the
last page of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With this notice, the Commission is asking agencies with
jurisdiction by law and/or special expertise with respect to the
environmental issues of this project to formally cooperate in the
preparation of the environmental document.\3\ Agencies that would like
to request cooperating agency status should follow the instructions for
filing comments provided under the Public Participation section of this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Council on Environmental Quality regulations addressing
cooperating agency responsibilities are at title 40, Code of Federal
Regulations, section 1501.8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultation Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act

    In accordance with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
implementing regulations for section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, the Commission is using this notice to initiate
consultation with the applicable State Historic Preservation Office(s),
and to solicit their views and those of other government agencies,
interested Indian tribes, and the public on the project's potential
effects on historic properties.\4\ The environmental document for this
project will document findings on the impacts on historic properties
and summarize the status of consultations under section 106.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations
are at title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, part 800. Those
regulations define historic properties as any prehistoric or
historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in
or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Environmental Mailing List

    The environmental mailing list includes Federal, State, and local
government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American Tribes; other
interested parties; and local libraries and newspapers. This list also
includes all affected landowners (as defined in the Commission's
regulations) who are potential right-of-way grantors, whose property
may be used temporarily for project purposes, or who own homes within
certain distances of aboveground facilities, and anyone who submits
comments on the project and includes a mailing address with their
comments. Commission staff will update the environmental mailing list
as the analysis proceeds to ensure that Commission notices related to
this environmental review are sent to all individuals, organizations,
and government entities interested in and/or potentially affected by
the proposed project.
    If you need to make changes to your name/address, or if you would
like to remove your name from the mailing list, please complete one of
the following steps:
    (1) Send an email to [email protected] stating your
request. You must include the docket number CP23-507-000 in your
request. If you are requesting a change to your address, please be sure
to include your name and the correct address. If you are requesting to
delete your address from the mailing list, please include your name and
address as it appeared on this notice. This email address is unable to
accept comments.
    OR
    (2) Return the attached ``Mailing List Update Form'' (appendix 2).

Additional Information

    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC website at www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the docket number
in the ``Docket Number'' field. Be sure you have selected an
appropriate date range. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at [email protected] or<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of all formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
    Public sessions or site visits will be posted on the Commission's
calendar located at https://www.ferc.gov/news-events/events along with
other related information.

    Dated: August 3, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.

Appendix 1

    Project Location Map
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09AU23.030

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09AU23.031

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09AU23.032

[FR Doc. 2023-16971 Filed 8-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-C


[Federal Register: March 11, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 47)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11433-11435]
[DOCID:fr11mr10-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-1176; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-062-AD;
Amendment 39-16226; AD 2010-06-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model G58
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model G58 airplanes. This AD requires
inspecting the installation of stand-off hardware between the heater
fuel line and the heater over-temperature sensor wires and also brake
reservoir tubing and the heater fuel pump wiring for minimum clearance
and installing acceptable stand-off hardware if stand-off hardware is
missing or inadequate. This AD results from reports received of a power
wire shorting out on the brake reservoir tube. We are issuing this AD
to detect and correct inadequate clearance of the brake reservoir
tubing and the heater fuel pump wiring, which could result in chafing
and shorting out of the electrical wiring and chafing of the tubing
carrying flammable fluids. This condition could lead to a fire in the
nose wheel well.

DATES: This AD becomes effective on April 15, 2010.
    On April 15, 2010, the Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this
AD.

ADDRESSES: To get the service information identified in this AD,
contact Hawker Beechcraft Corporation, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas
67201-0085; telephone: 1<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (316)
676-3340; Internet: http://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com.
    To view the AD docket, go to U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov. The docket number is FAA-2009-1176;
Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-062-AD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Schwemmer, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    On December 8, 2009, we issued a proposal to amend part 39 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that
would apply to certain Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model G58
airplanes. This proposal was published in the Federal Register as a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on December 17, 2009 (74 FR
66930). The NPRM proposed to require inspecting the installation of
stand-off hardware between the heater fuel line and the heater over-
temperature sensor wires and also brake reservoir tubing and the heater
fuel pump wiring for minimum clearance and installing acceptable stand-
off hardware if stand-off hardware is missing or inadequate.

Comments

    We provided the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
and FAA's response to each comment:

Comment Issue No. 1: Effective Date

    Mr. Busby states we should make the effective date of the AD
immediate.
    The FAA disagrees. We carefully reviewed the data for this safety
concern to assess the risk level of this particular event. After
reviewing the data, we compared this safety concern with similar safety
concerns in the past. Then, we assigned a level of risk for this
particular event equivalent to the level of risk assigned to the
similar past safety concerns we used for comparison. With the
information we have at this time, we set the time frame to comply with
the actions for this AD similar to the time frame that was set for
similar safety concerns that had equivalent risk levels. Without
additional information to increase the risk level of this safety
concern we have determined that the time frame set for complying with
this safety concern is in line with past precedent.
    We are not changing the final rule AD action based on this comment.

Comment Issue No. 2: Work-Hours

    Mr. Busby states that the work-hours allotted to do the proposed
inspection are not enough. We infer the commenter wants us to increase
the work-hours to do the proposed inspection to relieve the pressure on
mechanics.
    The FAA disagrees. For this AD, we derived the work-hours from the
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation service information. Those work-hours
were used to calculate the estimated cost impact on the owners/
operators of the affected airplanes. The FAA uses that cost estimate in
the economic analysis to determine if the AD will have a substantial
impact on small entities. In general, the direct cost to an operator is
the most significant economic consideration of an AD. Since the work-
hours in the AD are estimates for determining cost impact to the
operator, maintenance personnel may take more or less time to do the
inspection and/or maintenance as is necessary for that particular
aircraft or task. Moderately increasing the estimated work-hours for
the initial inspection does not significantly increase the cost impact
on the operator.
    We are not changing the final rule AD action based on this comment.

Conclusion

    We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that
air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed
except for minor editorial corrections. We have determined that these
minor corrections:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 71 airplanes in the U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to do the inspection of the heater
fuel line, the heater over-temperature sensor wires, the brake
reservoir line, and the fuel heater power wire:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                               Total cost per     Total cost on
                 Labor cost                             Parts cost                airplane       U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85............  Not applicable................               $85            $6,035
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We estimate the following costs to do any necessary stand-off
hardware installation that would be required based on the results of
the inspection. We have no way of determining the number of airplanes
that may need this installation:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Total cost
               Labor cost                   Parts cost     per airplane
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.5 work-hour x $85 per hour = $42.50....             $50          $92.50
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacement of
the brake line that would be required based on the results of the
inspection. We have no way of determining the number of airplanes that
may need this installation:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Total cost
               Labor cost                   Parts cost     per airplane
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 work-hours x $85 per hour = $510......            $100            $610
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Hawker Beechcraft Corporation will allow warranty credit as
specified in Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 32-3898,
dated November 2008.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this AD.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD (and
other information as included in the Regulatory Evaluation) and placed
it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by sending a
request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket
No. FAA-2009-1176; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-062-AD'' in your
request.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding a new AD to read as follows:

2010-06-02 Hawker Beechcraft Corporation: Amendment 39-16226; Docket
No. FAA-2009-1176; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-062-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD becomes effective on April 15, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Model G58 airplanes, serial numbers TH-
2125 through TH-2172 and TH-2174 through TH-2220, that are
certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 32: Landing
Gear.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD results from reports received of a power wire
shorting out on the brake reservoir tube. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct inadequate clearance of the brake reservoir
tubing and the heater fuel pump wiring, which could result in
chafing and shorting out of the electrical wiring and chafing of the
tubing carrying flammable fluids. This condition could lead to a
fire in the nose wheel well.

Compliance

    (f) To address this problem, you must do the following, unless
already done:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Actions                 Compliance            Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Inspect the installation  Within the next 50    Follow Hawker
 of the stand-off hardware     hours time-in-        Beechcraft
 between the heater fuel       service (TIS) after   Mandatory Service
 line and heater over-         April 15, 2010 (the   Bulletin SB 32-
 temperature sensor wires      effective date of     3898, dated
 for minimum clearance.        this AD) or within    November 2008.
                               the next 12 months
                               after April 15,
                               2010 (the effective
                               date of this AD),
                               whichever occurs
                               first.
(2) If, during the            Before further        Follow Hawker
 inspection required in        flight after the      Beechcraft
 paragraph (f)(1) of this      inspection where      Mandatory Service
 AD, the stand-off hardware    the missing stand-    Bulletin SB 32-
 is not installed or it does   off hardware and/or   3898, dated
 not maintain the minimum      inadequate            November 2008.
 clearance, install stand-     clearance was found.
 off hardware as specified
 in the service information.
(3) Inspect the brake         Within the next 50    Follow Hawker
 reservoir line and the fuel   hours TIS after       Beechcraft
 heater power wire for         April 15, 2010 (the   Mandatory Service
 damage.                       effective date of     Bulletin SB 32-
                               this AD) or within    3898, dated
                               the next 12 months    November 2008.
                               after April 15,
                               2010 (the effective
                               date of this AD),
                               whichever occurs
                               first.
(4) If, during the            Before further        Follow Hawker
 inspection required in        flight after the      Beechcraft
 paragraph (f)(3) of this      inspection where      Mandatory Service
 AD, damage is found, repair   damaged tubing and/   Bulletin SB 32-
 or replace damaged tubing     or wiring was found.  3898, dated
 and/or wiring found.                                November 2008.
(5) Inspect the installation  Within the next 50    Follow Hawker
 of the stand-off hardware     hours TIS after       Beechcraft
 between the brake reservoir   April 15, 2010 (the   Mandatory Service
 line and the fuel heater      effective date of     Bulletin SB 32-
 power wire for minimum        this AD) or within    3898, dated
 clearance.                    the next 12 months    November 2008.
                               after April 15,
                               2010 (the effective
                               date of this AD),
                               whichever occurs
                               first.
(6) If, during the            Before further        Follow Hawker
 inspection required in        flight after the      Beechcraft
 paragraph (f)(5) of this      inspection where      Mandatory Service
 AD, the stand-off hardware    the missing stand-    Bulletin SB 32-
 is not installed or it does   off hardware and/or   3898, dated
 not maintain the minimum      inadequate            November 2008.
 clearance, install stand-     clearance was found.
 off hardware as specified
 in the service information.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (g) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Kevin Schwemmer, Aerospace Engineer, FAA Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Wichita, Kansas
67209; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (h) You must use Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB
32-3898, dated November 2008, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-
0085; telephone: 1<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (316) 676-
3340; Internet: http://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the FAA, Central Region,
Office of the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the
Central Region, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 2, 2010.
Sandra J. Campbell,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-5024 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: May 1, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 83)]
[Notices]
[Page 23814-23815]
[DOCID:fr01my07-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2385-021]

Finch, Pruyn and Company, Finch Hydro Holdings LLC; Notice of
Application for Transfer of License and Soliciting Comments, Motions To
Intervene, and Protests

April 24, 2007.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Transfer of License.
    b. Project No.: 2385-021.
    c. Date Filed: April 20, 2007.
    d. Applicants: Finch, Pruyn and Company, Inc. (FP&C)(Transferor)
and Finch Hydro Holdings LLC (FHH) (Transferee).
    e. Name and Location of Project: The Glens Falls Hydroelectric
Project is located on the Hudson River, in Warren and Saratoga
Counties, New York.
    f. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    g. Applicant Contacts: For FP&C (Transferor): Mr. David P. Manny,
Finch, Pruyn and Company, Inc., 1 Glen Street, Glen Falls, NY 10821-
0396. Charles G. Banino, Wormser, Kiely, Galef & Jacobs LLP, 825 Third
Avenue, New York, NY 10022,<PHONE_NUMBER>. For FHH (Transferee): Finch
Hydro Holdings LLC, Attn: Andrew Bursky, One Sound Shore Drive, Suite
302, Greenwich, CT 06830. Douglas W. Smith, John Clements, Van Ness
Feldman, PC, 1050 Thomas Jefferson St., NW., Washington, DC 20007,
(202) 298-1800.
    h. FERC Contact: Etta L. Foster<PHONE_NUMBER>, and e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    i. Deadline for filing comments, protests, and motions to
intervene: May 9, 2007.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper, see 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing''
link. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. Please
include the project number (P-2385-021) on any comments, protests, or
motions filed.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
interveners filing a document with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person in the official service list for the
project. Further, if an intervener files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the documents on that resource agency.
    j. Description of Application: Applicants request approval, under
Section 8 of the Federal Power Act, of a transfer of license for the
Glens Falls Hydroelectric Project No. 2385 from Finch, Pruyn and
Company, Inc. to Finch Hydro Holdings LLC.
    k. This filing is available for review at the Commission in the
Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the project

number excluding the last three digits (P-2385) in the docket number
field to access the document. For online assistance, contact
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free<PHONE_NUMBER>, for TTY,

call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the addresses in item g.
    l. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    m. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene--Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    n. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents--Any filings must
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTESTS'', OR
``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable, and the Project Number of the
particular application to which the filing refers. Any of the above-
named documents must be filed by providing the original and the number
of copies provided by the Commission's regulations to: The Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. A copy of any motion to intervene must also be
served upon each representative

of the Applicant specified in the particular application.
    o. Agency Comments--Federal, state, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filling
comments, it will be assumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8216 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


                               US. EPA Region 9
                Docket Index for Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
                            [EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0732]

Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; California; Eastern Kern, Imperial, Placer, Yolo-Solano; Prevention of Significant Deterioration

Note: Copies of the Federal Register (FR) notices listed in Section 2 are only provided if they are pre-1994 FR notices. Please visit http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=FR to view FR notices from 1994 to the present.

                                   Document
                              Docket Index Number
Section 1 - SIP Submittal Documents

Eastern Kern Rule 210.4

SIP submittal letter from CARB to EPA dated April 25, 2012
                                                                            1.1
EKAPCD SIP submittal to CARB dated February 3, 2012
                                                                            1.2
EKAPCD, Final Staff Report, Rule 210.4 Prevention of Significant Deterioration, January 19, 2012
                                                                            1.3
Rule 210.4, Prevention of Significant Deterioration, adopted January 12, 2012
                                                                            1.4
Eastern Kern SIP Completeness Checklist
                                                                            1.5
Eastern Kern Rule Evaluation Form
                                                                            1.6
Eastern Kern Board Resolution
                                                                            1.7
Eastern Kern Proof of Publication - Public Notice
                                                                            1.8
Imperial Rule 904

SIP submittal letter from CARB dated February 1, 2012
                                                                            1.9
ICAPCD SIP submittal to CARB dated February 3, 2012
                                                                           1.10
ICAPCD, Final Staff Report, Rule Revisions to Permit Greenhouse Gases, December 20, 2011
                                                                           1.11
Rule 904, Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit Program, adopted DATE
                                                                           1.12
Imperial SIP Completeness Checklist
                                                                           1.13
Imperial Rule Evaluation Form
                                                                           1.14
Imperial Board Resolution
                                                                           1.15
Imperial Proof of Publication - Public Notice
                                                                           1.16
Placer Rule 518

SIP submittal letter from CARB dated June 21, 2011
                                                                           1.17
PCAPCD, Final Staff Report, Proposed New Rule, Prevention of Significant Deterioration, January 4, 2011
                                                                           1.18
Rule 518, Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit Program, adopted February 10, 2011
                                                                           1.19
Placer SIP Completeness Checklist
                                                                           1.20
Placer Rule Evaluation Form
                                                                           1.21
Placer Board Resolution
                                                                           1.22
Placer Proof of Publication - Public Notice
                                                                           1.23
Yolo-Solano Rule 3.24

SIP submittal letter from CARB dated July 3, 2012
                                                                           1.24
Yolo-Solano, Final Staff Report, Proposed Adoption of Rule 3.24, Prevention of Significant Deterioration, May 29, 2012
                                                                           1.25
Rule 3.24, Prevention of Significant Deterioration, adopted June 13, 2012
                                                                           1.26
Yolo-Solano SIP Completeness Checklist
                                                                           1.27
Yolo-Solano Rule Evaluation Form
                                                                           1.28
Yolo-Solano Board Resolution
                                                                           1.29
Yolo-Solano Certification of Publication - Public Notice
                                                                           1.30

Section 2 - Federal Register Notices

Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Baseline Emissions Determination, Actual-to-Future-Actual Methodology, Plantwide Applicability Limitations, Clean Units, Pollution Control Projects - 67 FR 80186 on December 31, 2002
                                                                            2.1

Section 3 - Other Supporting Documents

Technical Support Document, EPA Region 9, September 21, 2012
                                                                            3.1
Letter from EKAPCD to EPA regarding Rule 210.4 Clarifications, July 19, 2012
                                                                            3.2
Letter from ICAPCD to EPA regarding Rule 904 Clarifications, July 10, 2012
                                                                            3.3
Letter from PCAPCD to EPA regarding Rule 518 Clarifications, July 6, 2012
                                                                            3.4
Letter from YSAQMD to EPA regarding Rule 3.24, August 7, 2012
                                                                            3.5
Evaluation of Eastern Kern Rule 210.4 and 40 CFR 51.166
                                                                            3.6
Evaluation of Imperial Rule 904, Placer Rule 518, and Yolo-Solano Rule 3.24 and 40 CFR 51.166
                                                                            3.7
Letter from EKAPCD to EPA regarding PM2.5 SILs, August 21, 2012
                                                                            3.8
Letter from ICAPCD to EPA regarding PM2.5 SILs, August 21, 2012
                                                                            3.9
Letter from PCAPCD to EPA regarding PM2.5 SILs, August 20, 2012
                                                                           3.10
List of EPA-issued PSD Permits, EPA Region 9, September 2012
                                                                           3.11
EKAPCD SIP Submittal Completeness Letter from EPA, June 7, 2012
                                                                           3.12
ICAPCD SIP Submittal Completeness Letter from EPA, March 13, 2012
                                                                           3.13
PCAPCD SIP Submittal Completeness Letter from EPA, July 15, 2011
                                                                           3.14
YSAQMD SIP Submittal Completeness Letter from EPA, September 13, 2012
                                                                           3.15
Letters from EPA to EKAPCD, ICAPCD, PCAPCD, YSAQMD requesting additional information, June-July 2012
                                                                           3.16

Section 4 - EPA Rulemaking Documents

[Reserved]

Section 5 - Comments on Proposed Action

[Reserved]