[Federal Register: March 4, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 42)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 9756-9760]
[DOCID:fr04mr10-2]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0712; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-152-AD;
Amendment 39-16205; AD 2010-04-12]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-100 and
DHC-8-200 Series Airplanes, and Model DHC-8-301, -311, and -315
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model DHC-8-100 and DHC-8-200 series airplanes, and DHC-8-301, -311,
and -315 airplanes. This AD requires implementing a corrosion
prevention and control program (CPCP) either by accomplishing specific
tasks or by revising the maintenance inspection program to include a
CPCP. This AD results from the determination that, as airplanes age,
they are more likely to exhibit indications of corrosion. We are
issuing this AD to prevent structural failure of the airplane due to
corrosion.

DATES: This AD is effective April 8, 2010.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of April 8,
2010.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig Yates, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-100 and DHC-8-200 series airplanes, and
DHC-8-301, -311, and -315 airplanes. That NPRM was published in the
Federal Register on August 13, 2009 (74 FR 40778). That NPRM proposed
to require implementing a corrosion prevention and control program
(CPCP) either by accomplishing specific tasks or by revising the
maintenance inspection program to include a CPCP.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received from the single commenter.

Request for Clarification of Inspections

    Mesa Airlines requests that we restate that the inspections
required by paragraph (h) of this AD to specify to inspect for
Environmental Damage and/or Corrosion Protection and Control Program
(ED/CPCP). The commenter asserts that the NPRM would require only tasks
identified as both ED and CPCP. Mesa Airlines notes that accomplishing
the ED/CPCP inspections only does not encompass the Air Transport
Association (ATA) of America Codes listed in the NPRM.
    We agree. Canadian AD CF-2007-06, dated April 10, 2007, describes
doing ``ED/CPCP'' inspections. The required actions include ``ED''
inspections and inspections identified as both ``ED'' and ``CPCP.'' We
have clarified this in paragraph (h) of this AD. This has been
coordinated with TCCA. We have also revised paragraphs (i) and (i)(2)
of this AD to clarify the inspections.

Explanation of Change Made to This AD

    We have revised this AD to identify the legal name of the
manufacturer as published in the most recent type certificate data
sheet for the affected airplane models.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD with the changes described previously. We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.

Explanation of Change to Costs of Compliance

    Since issuance of the NPRM, we have increased the labor rate used
in the Costs of Compliance from $80 per work-hour to $85 per work-hour.
The Costs of Compliance information, below, reflects this increase in
the specified hourly labor rate.

Costs of Compliance

    This AD affects about 154 airplanes of U.S. registry. There are
between 16 and 17 specific inspections, depending on the applicable
manual identified in Table 1 of this AD. The inspections take about 53
work hours per airplane, per inspection cycle, at an average labor rate
of $85 per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of
this AD for U.S. operators is $693,770, or $4,505 per airplane, per
inspection cycle.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,

    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
Reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2010-04-12 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16205. Docket No. FAA-
2009-0712; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-152-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective April 8,
2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-101, DHC-8-
102, DHC-8-103, DHC-8-106, DHC-8-201, DHC-8-202, DHC-8-301, DHC-8-
311, and DHC-8-315 airplanes, certificated in any category; serial
numbers 003 and subsequent.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Codes 32: Landing
Gear, 51: Standard Practices/Structures; 52: Doors; 53: Fuselage;
54: Nacelles/Pylons; 55: Stabilizers; and 57: Wings.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD results from the determination that, as airplanes
age, they are more likely to exhibit indications of corrosion. We
are issuing this AD to prevent structural failure of the airplane
due to corrosion.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Manual References

    (g) This AD refers to the manuals listed in Table 1 of this AD.

                       Table 1--Applicable Manuals
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Bombardier model                          Manual
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) DHC-8-101, -102, -103,     Part 1, Section 3, Structural Inspection
 and -106 airplanes.            Program, of the Bombardier de Havilland
                                Dash 8 Maintenance Program Maintenance
                                Review Board Report Dash 8 Series 100
                                Program Support Manual (PSM) 1-8-7,
                                Revision 22, dated November 1, 2008.
(2) DHC-8-201 and DHC-8-202    Part 1, Section 3, Structural Inspection
 airplanes.                     Program, of the Bombardier de Havilland
                                Dash 8 Maintenance Program Maintenance
                                Review Board Report Dash 8 Series 200
                                PSM 1-82-7, Revision 13, dated November
                                1, 2008.
(3) Model DHC-8-301, DHC-8-    Part 1, Section 3, Structural Inspection
 311, and DHC-8-315 airplanes.  Program, of the Bombardier de Havilland
                                Dash 8 Maintenance Program Maintenance
                                Review Board Report Dash 8 Series 300,
                                PSM 1-83-7, Revision 22, dated November
                                1, 2008.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Inspections

    (h) At the later of the times specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and
(h)(2) of this AD, do each of the Environmental Damage/Corrosion
Protection and Control Program (ED/CPCP) inspections identified with
both ``ED'' and ``CPCP,'' or with only ``ED,'' including re-
protection tasks, as applicable, which are found in the ``Type of
Damage'' column of the applicable manual found in Table 1 of this
AD, in accordance with the applicable manual identified in Table 1
of this AD. Except as provided by paragraph (i) of this AD, repeat
each task thereafter at intervals not to exceed the compliance time
specified in the ``Repeat'' column of the applicable manual
identified in Table 1 of this AD.
    (1) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD.
    (2) At the compliance time specified in the ``Threshold'' column
of the applicable manual identified in Table 1 of this AD since the
date of issuance of the original Canadian airworthiness certificate
or the date of issuance of the original Canadian export certificate
of airworthiness. If there is no value in the ``Threshold'' column,
use the time specified in the ``Repeat'' column.
    (i) After accomplishment of each initial ED/CPCP and ED task
required by paragraph (h) of this AD, the FAA may approve the
incorporation into the operator's approved maintenance/inspection
program of the CPCP specified in the applicable manual identified in
Table 1 of this AD; or the equivalent program that is approved in
accordance with this AD. In all cases, the initial corrosion task
for each airplane area must be completed by the initial compliance
time specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.
    (1) Any operator complying with paragraph (i) of this AD may use
an alternative recordkeeping method to that otherwise required by
section 91.417 (``Maintenance records'') or section 121.380
(``Maintenance recording requirements'') of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 91.417 or 14 CFR 121.380, respectively) for the
actions required by this AD, provided that the recordkeeping method
is approved by the FAA and is included in a revision to the
maintenance/inspection program. For the purposes of this paragraph,
``the FAA'' is defined as the cognizant Principal Maintenance
Inspector (PMI) for operators that are assigned a PMI (i.e., part
121, 125, and 135 operators), and the cognizant Flight Standards
District Office for other operators (i.e., part 91 operators).
    (2) After the initial accomplishment of the ED/CPCP and ED tasks
required by paragraph (h) of this AD, any extension of the
repetitive intervals specified in the manual must be approved by the
Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA.

Corrective Actions

    (j) If any corrosion is found during accomplishment of any
action required by paragraph (h) of this AD: Before further flight,
rework, repair, or replace, as applicable, in accordance with a
method approved by either the Manager, New York ACO, FAA; or
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) (or its delegated agent).

Reporting Requirements for Level 3 Corrosion Findings

    (k) If any Level 3 corrosion, as defined in Part 1 of the
Bombardier (de Havilland) DHC-6 Twin Otter, Dash 7 & Dash 8
Corrosion Prevention and Control Manual, PSM 1-GEN-5, Revision 3,
dated November 30, 1998, is found during the accomplishment of any
action required by this AD, do paragraphs (k)(1), (k)(2), and (k)(3)
of this AD. Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
    (1) Within 3 days after the finding of Level 3 corrosion, report
findings to the Manager, New York ACO, FAA, in accordance with the
Bombardier (de Havilland) DHC-6 Twin Otter, Dash 7 & Dash 8
Corrosion Prevention and Control Manual, PSM 1-GEN-5, Revision 3,
dated November 30, 1998.

    (2) Within 10 days after the finding of Level 3 corrosion,
either submit a plan to the FAA to identify a schedule for
accomplishing the applicable CPCP task on the remainder of the
airplanes in the operator's fleet that are subject to this AD, or
provide data substantiating that the Level 3 corrosion that was
found is an isolated case. The FAA may impose a schedule other than
that proposed in the plan upon finding that a change to the schedule
is needed to ensure that any other Level 3 corrosion is detected in
a timely manner. For the purposes of this paragraph, ``the FAA'' is
defined as the cognizant Principal Maintenance Inspector (PMI) for
operators that are assigned a PMI (i.e., part 121, 125, and 135
operators), and the cognizant Flight Standards District Office for
other operators (i.e., part 91 operators).
    (3) Within the time schedule approved in accordance with
paragraph (k)(2) of this AD, accomplish the applicable task on the
remainder of the airplanes in the operator's fleet that are subject
to this AD.

Limiting Future Corrosion Findings

    (l) If corrosion findings that exceed Level 1 are found in any
area during any repeat of any CPCP task after the initial
accomplishment required by paragraph (h) of this AD: Within 60 days
after such finding, implement a means approved by the FAA to reduce
future findings of corrosion in that area to Level 1 or better. For
the purposes of this paragraph, ``the FAA'' is defined as the
cognizant PMI for operators that are assigned a PMI (i.e., part 121,
125, and 135 operators), and the cognizant Flight Standards District
Office for other operators (i.e., part 91 operators).

Scheduling Corrosion Tasks for Transferred Airplanes

    (m) Before any airplane subject to this AD is transferred and
placed into service by an operator: Establish a schedule for
accomplishing the CPCP tasks required by this AD in accordance with
paragraph (m)(1) or (m)(2) of this AD, as applicable.
    (1) For airplanes on which the CPCP tasks required by this AD
have been accomplished previously at the schedule established by
this AD: Perform the first CPCP task in each area in accordance with
the previous operator's schedule, or in accordance with the new
operator's schedule, whichever results in an earlier accomplishment
of that CPCP task. After the initial accomplishment of each CPCP
task in each area as required by this paragraph, repeat each CPCP
task in accordance with the new operator's schedule.
    (2) For airplanes on which the CPCP tasks required by this AD
have not been accomplished previously, or have not been accomplished
at the schedule established by this AD: The new operator must
perform each initial CPCP task in each area before further flight or
in accordance with a schedule approved by the FAA. For the purposes
of this paragraph, ``the FAA'' is defined as the cognizant Principal
Maintenance Inspector (PMI) for operators that are assigned a PMI
(i.e., part 121, 125, and 135 operators), and the cognizant Flight
Standards District Office for other operators (i.e., part 91
operators).

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (n)(1) The Manager, New York ACO, ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Program
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone 516-
228-7300; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.

Related Information

    (o) Canadian airworthiness directive CF-2007-06, dated April 10,
2007, also addresses the subject of this AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (p) You must use the service information contained in Table 2 of
this AD, as applicable, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.

                                   Table 2--Material Incorporated by Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Document                            Revision                     Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part 1, Section 3, Structural Inspection Program, of the           22  November 1, 2008.
 Bombardier de Havilland Dash 8 Maintenance Program
 Maintenance Review Board Report Dash 8 Series 100 Program
 Support Manual (PSM) 1-8-7.
Part 1, Section 3, Structural Inspection Program, of the           13  November 1, 2008.
 Bombardier de Havilland Dash 8 Maintenance Program
 Maintenance Review Board Report Series 200 PSM 1-82-7.
Part 1, Section 3, Structural Inspection Program, of the           22  November 1, 2008.
 Bombardier de Havilland Dash 8 Maintenance Program
 Maintenance Review Board Report Dash 8 Series 300, PSM 1-
 83-7.
Bombardier (de Havilland) DHC-6 Twin Otter, Dash 7 & Dash           3  November 30, 1998.
 8 Corrosion Prevention and Control Manual, PSM 1[dash]GEN-
 5, Part 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Bombardier de Havilland Dash 8 Maintenance Program Maintenance
Review Board Report Dash 8 Series 100 PSM 1-8-7, Revision 22, dated
November 1, 2008, contains the following effective pages:

                                             List of Effective Pages
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Page title/ description           Page number(s)        Revision number          Date shown on page(s)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title Page........................  None shown...........  22...................  November 1, 2008.
List of Effective Pages...........  1-4..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
Log of Revisions..................  1-18.................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
Record of Revisions...............  1-2..................  22...................  November 1, 2008.
Contents..........................  1-4..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
Section 3:
    Subject 3-0...................  1-4..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-32..................  1-2..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-52..................  1-2..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-53..................  1-16.................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-54..................  1-4..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-55..................  1-8..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-57..................  1-12.................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Bombardier de Havilland Dash 8 Maintenance Program Maintenance
Review Board Report Dash 8 Series 200 PSM 1-82-7, Revision 13, dated
November 1, 2008, contains the following effective pages:

                                             List of Effective Pages
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Page title/ description           Page number(s)        Revision number          Date shown on page(s)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title Page........................  None shown...........  13...................  November 1, 2008.
List of Effective Pages...........  1-4..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
Log of Revisions..................  1-8..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
Record of Revisions...............  1-2..................  13...................  November 1, 2008.
Contents..........................  1-4..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
Section 3:
    Subject 3-0...................  1-4..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-32..................  1-2..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-52..................  1-2..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-53..................  1-16.................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-54..................  1-4..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-55..................  1-6..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-57..................  1-12.................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Bombardier de Havilland Dash 8 Maintenance Program Maintenance
Review Board Report Dash 8 Series 300 PSM 1-83-7, Revision 22, dated
November 1, 2008, contains the following effective pages:

                                             List of Effective Pages
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Page title/description            Page number(s)        Revision number          Date shown on page(s)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title Page........................  None shown...........  22...................  November 1, 2008.
List of Effective Pages...........  1-4..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
Log of Revisions..................  1-18.................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
Record of Revisions...............  1-2..................  22...................  November 1, 2008.
Contents..........................  1-4..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
Section 3:
    Subject 3-0...................  1-4..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-32..................  1-2..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-52..................  1-2..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-53..................  1-18.................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-54..................  1-4..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-55..................  1-8..................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
    Subject 3-57..................  1-12.................  None shown*..........  November 1, 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(*Only the title page and Record of Revisions of these documents specify the revision level of these documents.)

    Bombardier (de Havilland) DHC-6 Twin Otter, Dash 7 & Dash 8
Corrosion Prevention and Control Manual PSM 1-GEN-5, Part 1,
Revision 3, dated November 30, 1998, contains the following
effective pages:

                                             List of Effective Pages
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Page title/ description           Page number(s)        Revision number          Date shown on page(s)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title Page........................  None shown...........  None shown*..........  November 8, 1993.
Record of Revisions...............  1....................  3....................  August 27, 1991.
                                    2....................  None shown*..........  August 27, 1991.
Part 1 List of Effective Pages....  1-2..................  None shown*..........  November 30, 1998.
Part 1 Table of Contents..........  1-4..................  None shown*..........  November 8, 1993.
Part 1 List of Illustrations......  1-2..................  None shown*..........  November 8, 1993.
Part 1 List of Tables.............  1....................  None shown*..........  November 8, 1993.
                                    2....................  None shown*..........  August 27, 1991.
Introduction......................  1-2..................  None shown*..........  November 8, 1993.
                                    3-4..................  None shown*..........  November 5, 1992.
Chapter 1.........................  1-1 through 1-10.....  None shown*..........  November 8, 1993.
Chapter 2.........................  2-1 through 2-6......  None shown*..........  November 8, 1993.
Chapter 3.........................  3-1 through 3-4......  None shown*..........  November 8, 1993.
Chapter 4.........................  4-1 through 4-44.....  None shown*..........  November 8, 1993.
Chapter 5.........................  5-1 through 5-48.....  None shown*..........  November 8, 1993.
Chapter 6.........................  6-1 through 6-8,.....  None shown*..........  August 27, 1991.
                                    6-11 through 6-16....

                                    6-9..................  None shown*..........  November 8, 1993.
                                    6-10.................  None shown*..........  November 5, 1992.
Chapter 7.........................  7-1 through 7-2......  None shown*..........  November 8, 1993.
Chapter 8.........................  8-1 through 8-4......  None shown*..........  November 8, 1993.
Chapter 9.........................  9-1 through 9-4......  None shown*..........  November 30, 1998.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(*Only page 1 of the Record of Revisions of Bombardier (de Havilland) DHC-6 Twin Otter, Dash 7 & Dash 8
  Corrosion Prevention and Control Manual PSM 1-GEN- 5, Part 1, Revision 3, contains the revision level of this
  document.)

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://
www.bombardier.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 11, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-3226 Filed 3-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 65 (Friday, April 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18903-18904]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07494]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP13-73-000; CP13-74-000]

Sierrita Gas Pipeline LLC; Notice of Availability of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Sierrita Pipeline
Project

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared a final environmental impact statement (EIS)
for the Sierrita Pipeline Project, proposed by Sierrita Gas Pipeline
LLC (Sierrita) in the above-referenced dockets. Sierrita requests
authorization to link El Paso Natural Gas Company's existing South
Mainline System near Tucson to an interconnect with the S[aacute]sabe-
Guaymas Pipeline at the U.S.-Mexico border near the town of Sasabe,
Arizona, that would provide up to 200,846 dekatherms per day of natural
gas to markets in Mexico.
    The final EIS assesses the potential environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the Sierrita Pipeline Project in
accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA). The FERC staff concludes that approval of the proposed
project, with the mitigation measures recommended in the EIS, would
have some adverse environmental impact; however, most of these impacts
would be reduced to less-than-significant levels.
    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)--Arizona Ecological
Services Office; the FWS--Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge; the
Arizona Game and Fish Department; and the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection participated as cooperating agencies in the preparation of
the EIS. Cooperating agencies have jurisdiction by law or special
expertise with respect to resources potentially affected by the
proposal and participate in the NEPA analysis. Although the cooperating
agencies provided input to the conclusions and recommendations
presented in the final EIS, the agencies will present their own
conclusions and recommendations in their respective Records of Decision
for the project.
    The final EIS addresses the potential environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the following project facilities:
     60.9 miles of 36-inch-diameter natural gas pipeline in
Pima County, Arizona;
     two meter stations;
     two pig launchers and two pig receivers \1\; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A pig is an internal tool that can be used to clean and dry
a pipeline and/or to inspect it for damage or corrosion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     six mainline valves.
    The FERC staff mailed copies of the EIS to federal, state, and
local government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American tribes;
potentially affected landowners and other interested individuals and
groups; newspapers and libraries in the project area; and parties to
this proceeding. Paper copy versions of the EIS were mailed to those
specifically requesting them; all others received a CD version. In
addition, the EIS is available for public viewing on the FERC's Web
site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. A limited number of copies
are available for distribution and public inspection at: Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, Public Reference Room, 888 First Street NE.,
Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on ``General Search,'' and enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field (i.e., CP13-
73 or CP13-74). Be sure you have selected

an appropriate date range. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>;
for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access
to the texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as
orders, notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm.

    Dated: March 28, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-07494 Filed 4-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 102 (Friday, May 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25782-25783]
[FR Doc No: E9-12450]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59956; File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2009-15]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Amex LLC; Order Granting
Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment
No. 1, Amending Rule 935NY--Order Exposure Requirements To Reduce the
Exposure Periods From Three Seconds to One Second

May 21, 2009.

I. Introduction

    On April 21, 2009, NYSE Amex LLC (``NYSE Amex'' or the
``Exchange''), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to reduce certain order exposure periods from
three seconds to one second. The proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on May 5, 2009.\3\ The Commission
received no comments on the proposal. The Exchange filed Amendment No.
1 to the proposal on May 20, 2009.\4\ This order approves the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(l).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59825 (April 27,
2009), 74 FR 20771 (``Notice'').
    \4\ Amendment No. 1 was a technical amendment to correct an
inadvertent error in language in the Purpose Section of 19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to reduce the exposure
time during which Amex Users may not execute as principal against
orders they represent as agent from three seconds to one second. Under
the current Rule 935NY, Order Exposure Requirements, Users may not
execute as principal orders they represent as agent unless agency
orders are first exposed on the Exchange for at least three seconds, or
the User has been bidding or offering on the Exchange for at least
three seconds prior to receiving an agency order that is executable
against such bid or offer. During this three-second exposure period,
other market participants may enter orders to trade against the exposed
order. Under this proposal, the exposure periods contained in Rule
935NY would be reduced to one second.

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    After carefully reviewing the proposed rule change, the Commission
finds that the proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.\5\ In particular, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\
which, among other things, requires that the rules of a national
securities exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The Commission also finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\7\ which requires
that the rules of an exchange not impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that, given the electronic nature of the
NYSE Amex System, reducing the exposure periods from three seconds to
one second could facilitate the prompt execution of orders, while
continuing to provide market participants with an opportunity to
compete for exposed bids and offers. To substantiate that NYSE Amex
members could receive, process, and communicate a response back to the
Exchange within one second, the Exchange stated that it conducted a
survey of Amex Trading Permit Holders (``ATP Holders'') to find out
whether their systems were capable of receiving, processing, and
responding to orders in a meaningful way within one second. NYSE Amex
stated that of the six member firms that responded to the Exchange's
survey, four indicated that the turnaround time was less than one
second, one declined to comment regarding its turnaround time, and one
stated that it was not exactly sure of its turnaround time.\8\ NYSE
Amex also stated that none of the responding ATP Holders anticipated
any problems related to order processing if the Exchange reduced the
exposure periods to one second, and none of the responding ATP Holders
were opposed to the reduced exposure periods.\9\ Based on NYSE Amex's
statements regarding the survey results, the Commission believes that
market participants should continue to have opportunities to compete
for exposed bids and offers within a one second exposure period.
Accordingly, the Commission believes that it is consistent with the Act
for NYSE Amex to reduce the exposure times discussed herein from three
seconds to one second.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Notice.
    \9\ Id. NYSE Amex stated that one respondent, when asked about
the proposed one second exposure periods, indicated that it ``might
be hard to respond that rapidly'' but then went on to state that
they felt NYSE Amex should make the change in order to match other
option exchanges' rules. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds good cause to approve the proposed rule change
prior to the thirtieth day after publication for comment in the Federal
Register. The Commission notes that the proposed rule change was
noticed for a fifteen-day comment period, and no comments were
received. The Commission believes that the Exchange has provided
reasonable support for its belief that the Exchange's market
participants would continue to have an opportunity to compete for
exposed bids and offers if the exposure periods were reduced to one
second as proposed. Finally, the

Commission also notes that the proposed rule change is similar to
recently approved proposals submitted by the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated, the International Securities Exchange, LLC,
NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc., and NYSE Arca, Inc.\10\ Therefore, the
Commission finds good cause, consistent with Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\11\ to approve the proposed rule change on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 58088 (July 2,
2008), 73 FR 39747 (July 10, 2008) (SR-CBOE-2008-16); 58224 (July
25, 2008), 73 FR 44303 (July 30, 2008) (SR-ISE-2007-94); 59081
(December 11, 2008), 73 FR 76432 (December 16, 2008) (SR-Phlx-2008-
79); and 59194 (January 5, 2009), 74 FR 976 (January 9, 2009).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\12\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEAmex-2009-15), as
modified by Amendment No. 1, be, and hereby is, approved on an
accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12450 Filed 5-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 867]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00482]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-84972; File No. SR-CboeBYX-2018-014]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on Proposed Rule
Change To Make Permanent Rule 11.24, Which Sets Forth the Exchange's
Pilot Retail Price Improvement Program

December 26, 2018.
    On July 30, 2018, Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BYX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to make permanent Rule 11.24, which sets forth the
Exchange's pilot Retail Price Improvement Program. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on August 17,
2018.\3\ On September 27, 2018, the Commission designated a longer
period within which to approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove the proposed rule change.\4\ On November 15, 2018, the
Commission instituted proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act
\5\ to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule
change.\6\ The Commission has received no comments on the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83831 (August 13,
2018), 83 FR 41128.
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84297, 83 FR 49959
(October 3, 2018). The Commission designated November 15, 2018, as
the date by which the Commission shall approve or disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the
proposed rule change.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78(s)(b)(2)(B).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84600, 83 FR 58802
(November 21, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \7\ provides that, after initiating
proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180 days after the
date of publication of notice of filing of the proposed rule change.
The Commission may, however, extend the period for issuing an order
approving or disapproving the proposed rule change by not more than 60
days if the Commission determines that a longer period is appropriate
and publishes the reasons for such determination. The proposed rule
change was published for notice and comment in the Federal Register on
August 17, 2018.\8\ February 13, 2019 is 180 days from that date, and
April 14, 2019 is 240 days from that date. The Commission finds it
appropriate to designate a longer period within which to issue an order
approving or disapproving the proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \8\ See supra note 3.
    \9\ The Commission notes that on December 11, 2018, the Exchange
filed a proposed rule change to extend the pilot period to June 30,
2019. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84830, 83 FR 65769
(December 21, 2018) (SR-CboeBYX-2018-025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\10\ a designates April 14, 2019, as the date by which the
Commission shall approve or disapprove the proposed rule change (File
No. SR-CboeBYX-2018-014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-00482 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 21 (Wednesday, January 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4531-4532]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01904]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 32994]

Notice of Applications for Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940

January 26, 2018.
    The following is a notice of applications for deregistration under
section 8(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for the month of
January 2018. A copy of each application may be obtained via the
Commission's website by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. An order granting each
application will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing on any application by writing to the
SEC's Secretary at the address below and serving the relevant applicant
with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on February 21, 2018, and
should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in the form of
an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to
Rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the nature of the
writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing
on the matter, the reason for the request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification
by writing to the Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES:  The Commission: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Jill Ehrlich, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551-6819 or Chief Counsel's Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>; SEC,
Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office, 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549-8010.

Ashmore Emerging Markets Income Fund [File No. 811-22775]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. Applicant has
never made a public offering of its securities and does not propose to
make a public offering or engage in business of any kind.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on October 20, 2017, and
amended on January 10, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: 61 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4AE, England.

MSAM Completion Portfolio [File No. 811-22596]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On July 1, 2016, applicant made a liquidating
distribution to its shareholders, based on net asset value. No expenses
were incurred in connection with the liquidation.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on October 27, 2017, and
amended on January 9, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts
02110.

Currency Income Advantage Portfolio [File No. 811-22855]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On April 29, 2017, applicant made a
liquidating distribution to its shareholders, based on net asset value.
No expenses were incurred in connection with the liquidation.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on October 27, 2017, and
amended on January 9, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts
02110.

CMBS Portfolio [File No. 811-22741]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On June 29, 2016, applicant made a
liquidating distribution to its shareholders, based on net asset value.
No expenses were incurred in connection with the liquidation.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on October 27, 2017, and
amended on January 9, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts
02110.

Montage Managers Trust [File No. 811-23023]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. The applicant has transferred its assets to
Managed Portfolio Series and, on March 21, 2017, made a final
distribution to its shareholders based on net asset value. Expenses of
$105,889.59 incurred in connection with the reorganization were paid by
the majority owner of the applicant's adviser.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on November 14, 2017.
    Applicant's Address: 5700 W 112th Street, Suite 500, Overland Park,
Kansas 66211.

Nuveen Quality Municipal 2018 Term Fund [File No. 811-22892]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. Applicant has
never made a public offering of its securities and does not propose to
make a public offering or engage in business of any kind.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on November 15, 2017, and
amended on December 13, 2017.
    Applicant's Address: 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois
60606.

Nuveen Technology Opportunities Fund [File No. 811-23009]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. Applicant has
never made a public offering of its securities and does not propose to
make a public offering or engage in business of any kind.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on November 15, 2017, and
amended on December 13, 2017.
    Applicant's Address: 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois
60606.

EnTrustPermal Hedge Strategies Fund I [File No. 811-22628]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On November
28, 2017 and November 30, 2017, applicant made liquidating
distributions to its shareholders, based on net asset value. Expenses
of $40,981 incurred in connection with the liquidation were paid by the
applicant's adviser or an affiliate thereof.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on December 1, 2017, and
amended on January 4, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10018.

EnTrustPermal Hedge Strategies Fund II [File No. 811-22836]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On November
28, 2017 and November 30, 2017, applicant made liquidating
distributions to its shareholders, based on net asset value. Expenses
of $41,120 incurred in connection with the liquidation were paid by the
applicant's adviser or an affiliate thereof.

    Filing Date: The application was filed on December 1, 2017, and
amended on January 4, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10018.

EnTrustPermal Hedge Strategies Portfolio [File No. 811-22850]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On November
28, 2017, applicant made a liquidating distribution to its
shareholders, based on net asset value. Expenses of $32,052 incurred in
connection with the liquidation were paid by the applicant's adviser or
an affiliate thereof.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on December 1, 2017, and
amended on January 4, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10018.

Salient Alternative Strategies I Fund [File No. 811-22389]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On April 1,
2015, July 29, 2015, January 27, 2016, June 24, 2016, and December 18,
2017, applicant made liquidating distributions to its shareholders,
based on net asset value. No expenses were incurred in connection with
the liquidation.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on December 19, 2017.
    Applicant's Address: 4265 San Felipe Street, 8th Floor, Houston,
Texas 77027.

Salient Alternative Strategies Master Fund [File No. 811-22387]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On March 31,
2015, July 29, 2015, January 27, 2016, June 24, 2016, and November 30,
2017, applicant made liquidating distributions to its shareholders,
based on net asset value. Expenses of $4,185 incurred in connection
with the liquidation were paid by the applicant.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on December 19, 2017.
    Applicant's Address: 4265 San Felipe Street, 8th Floor, Houston,
Texas 77027.

Marketocracy Funds [File No. 811-09445]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On September 15, 2017, applicant made a
liquidating distribution to its shareholders, based on net asset value.
Expenses of $1,595 incurred in connection with the liquidation were
paid by the applicant's adviser.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on December 21, 2017.
    Applicant's Address: 26888 Almaden Court, Los Altos, California
94022.

NorthStar Corporate Income Fund [File No. 811-23081]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On December
26, 2017, applicant made a liquidating distribution to its
shareholders, based on net asset value. Expenses of $22,000 incurred in
connection with the liquidation were paid by the applicant.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on December 26, 2017, and
amended on January 18, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: 590 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, New
York 10022.

NorthStar Corporate Income Fund-T [File No. 811-23116]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On December
26, 2017, applicant made a liquidating distribution to its
shareholders, based on net asset value. Expenses of $22,000 incurred in
connection with the liquidation were paid by the applicant.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on December 26, 2017, and
amended on January 18, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: 590 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, New
York 10022.

NorthStar Corporate Income Master Fund [File No. 811-23118]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On December
26, 2017, applicant made a liquidating distribution to its
shareholders, based on net asset value. Expenses of $22,000 incurred in
connection with the liquidation were paid by the applicant.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on December 26, 2017, and
amended on January 18, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: 590 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, New
York 10022.

Prospect Marketplace Lending Corporation [File No. 811-23204]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. Applicant has
never made a public offering of its securities and does not propose to
make a public offering or engage in business of any kind.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on January 4, 2018, and
amended on January 11, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: 10 East 40th Street, 42d Floor, New York, New
York 10016.

Cushing MLP Infrastructure Fund I [File No. 811-22727]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. The applicant
has transferred its assets to Cushing Mutual Funds Trust and, on
December 15, 2017, made a final distribution to its shareholders based
on net asset value. Expenses of $235,871 incurred in connection with
the reorganization were paid by the applicant's adviser.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on January 5, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: 8117 Preston Road, Suite 440, Dallas, Texas
75225.

Cushing MLP Infrastructure Master Fund [File No. 811-23069]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On December
15, 2017, applicant made a liquidating distribution to its
shareholders, based on net asset value. Expenses of $40,000 incurred in
connection with the liquidation were paid by the applicant's adviser.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on January 5, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: 8117 Preston Road, Suite 440, Dallas, Texas
75225.

TSC UITS [File No. 811-22719]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On December
5, 2017, applicant made a liquidating distribution to its shareholders,
based on net asset value. No expenses were incurred in connection with
the liquidation.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on January 10, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: 10 High Street, Suite 701, Boston,
Massachusetts 02210.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-01904 Filed 1-30-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 227 (Monday, November 26, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70369-70372]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28181]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0676; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-182-AD;
Amendment 39-17266; AD 2012-23-10]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by reports of the escape slide of the raft inflation system
not deploying when activated due to the rotation of the cable guide in
a direction which resulted in jamming of the inflation control cable.
This AD requires modifying the affected slide rafts. We are issuing
this AD to prevent non-deployment of the inflation system of the escape
slide raft, which could result in delayed evacuation from the airplane
during an emergency, and consequent injury to the passengers.

DATES: This AD becomes effective December 31, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of December 31,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1405; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on July 2, 2012 (77 FR
39186). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) states:

    Two occurrences on Airbus A320 aeroplanes have been reported
where the escape slide raft inflation system did not deploy when
activated, due to the rotation of the cable guide in a direction
which resulted in jamming of the inflation control cable.
Additionally, there has been one reported case where the system did
not deploy properly due to a cracked inflation hose fitting.
    Investigation conducted by the slide raft manufacturer showed
that the hose fitting could be subject to a bending moment if
improperly packed. Subsequently, the hose fitting could separate
from the reservoir and the inflation of the slide raft may be
impaired.
    This condition, if not corrected, could delay the evacuation
from the aeroplane in case of emergency, possibly resulting in
injury to the occupants.
    For the reasons described above, this [European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA)] AD requires modification of the affected slide rafts
or [optional] replacement thereof with modified units.

* * * * *
The modification includes installing a cable guide adaptor, an anti-
rotation bracket, and a new hose assembly. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received. United Airlines (UAL)
supports the compliance time of 36 months after the effective date of
this AD.

Request To Clarify Concurrent Requirements

    UAL requested we highlight that Air Cruisers Service Bulletin
S.B.A320 004-25-85 has a concurrent requirement to accomplish Air
Cruisers Service Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-56. UAL stated that it would
like to receive a confirmation that Air Cruisers Service Bulletin
S.B.A320 004-25-56 must also be accomplished to comply with the
proposed AD (77 FR 39186, July 2, 2012).
    We agree with UAL's comment. For the optional replacement in
paragraph (h) of this final rule, we have clarified that the concurrent
requirement specified in paragraph 1.B. of Air Cruisers Service
Bulletin S.B. A320 004-25-85, Revision 2, dated January 3, 2012, is
necessary. We have revised paragraphs (h), (j)(1), and (j)(2) in this
final rule accordingly.

Request To Remove the Parts Installation Limitation in Paragraph (j)(1)
of the Proposed AD (77 FR 39186, July 2, 2012)

    UAL requested that the parts installation limitation in paragraph
(j)(1) of the proposed AD (77 FR 39186, July 2, 2012) be removed. UAL
stated that the proposed requirement will remove the operator's
flexibility to replace a post-AD part number with a pre-AD part number
prior to the AD limit. UAL stated that, after the proposed AD effective
date, it agrees that any new slide-rafts released by the home shop
should have the AD requirements incorporated to prevent unit on-wing
installation beyond the AD limit, but not on the ones currently
installed on-wing. UAL stated that it believes the intent of the
proposed AD is to eliminate pre-AD part numbers after 36 months of the
effective date.

    We disagree with UAL's request to remove paragraph (j)(1) of this
final rule. Paragraph (j)(1) of this final rule only applies to those
airplanes that have accomplished the modification or replacement. The
intent of this AD is to prevent installation of the unsafe escape slide
rafts after accomplishing the required modification or replacement.
Operators have a compliance time of within 36 months after the
effective date of this AD to do the modification required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, or the alternative action specified in paragraph (h) of
this AD. We have not changed the AD in this regard.

Request To Incorporate New Service Information

    Airbus requested that we revise the proposed AD (77 FR 39186, July
2, 2012) to incorporate Air Cruisers Service Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-
85, Revision 1, dated September 30, 2011, and Revision 2, dated January
3, 2012; and to refer to EASA AD 2011-0160R1, dated March 15, 2012;
into the proposed AD.
    We agree with Airbus' request to reference the latest service
information. We have revised this AD to reference Air Cruisers Service
Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-85, Revision 2, dated January 3, 2012, for the
actions specified in paragraphs (h) and (j) of this AD. Air Cruisers
Service Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-85, Revision 2, dated January 3, 2012,
clarifies certain actions and figures. We have also added new paragraph
(k) of this AD to provide credit for actions done using Air Cruisers
Service Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-85, dated November 30, 2010; or Air
Cruisers Service Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-85, Revision 1, dated
September 30, 2011; before the effective date of this AD. In addition,
we have revised paragraph (m) of this AD to reference EASA AD 2011-
0160R1, dated March 15, 2012, which clarifies the parts installation
limitations specified in that EASA AD.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously--except for minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in NPRM
(77 FR 39186, July 2, 2012) for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 39186, July 2, 2012).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 745 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 19 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $341 per product.
Where the service information lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge
for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators
to be $1,457,220, or $1,956 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (77 FR 39186, July 2, 2012),
the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2012-23-10 Airbus: Amendment 39-17266. Docket No. FAA-2012-0676;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-182-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective December 31,
2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Airbus Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -
122 airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132,
and -133 airplanes; Model A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, -232,
and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -
213, -231, and -232 airplanes; certificated in any category; all
manufacturer serial numbers.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25: Equipment/
Furnishings.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of the escape slide of the raft
inflation system not deploying when activated due to the rotation of
the cable guide in a direction which

resulted in jamming of the inflation control table. We are issuing
this AD to prevent non-deployment of the inflation system of the
escape slide raft, which could result in delayed evacuation from the
airplane during an emergency, and consequent injury to the
passengers.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Modification

    Except as provided by paragraph (i) of this AD, within 36 months
after the effective date of this AD: Modify the escape slide rafts
that have a part number (P/N) specified in table 1 to paragraph (g)
of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-1723, dated December 17, 2010 (for
Model A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes); or Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-25-1724, dated December 17, 2010 (for Model A318
series airplanes).

         Table 1 to Paragraph (g) of This AD--Escape Slide Raft
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air Cruisers and Aerazur escape slide rafts part number if fitted with a
      reservoir and valve assembly P/N D18309-105 or P/N D18309-205
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               D30664-105
                               D30664-107
                               D30664-109
                               D30664-305
                               D30664-307
                               D30664-309
                               D30664-311
                               D30665-105
                               D30665-107
                               D30665-109
                               D30665-305
                               D30665-307
                               D30665-309
                               D30665-311
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(h) Replacement in Accordance With Air Cruisers Service Bulletin

    Replacement of all affected escape slide rafts on any affected
airplane with slide rafts that have been modified in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Air Cruisers Service Bulletin
S.B.A320 004-25-85, Revision 2, dated January 3, 2012, is acceptable
for compliance with the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD,
provided that prior to or concurrently with accomplishing the
modification, the installation of the cable guide assembly is done
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Air Cruisers
Service Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-56, dated November 12, 1999.

(i) Airplanes Not Affected by Paragraph (g) of This AD

    Airplanes on which Airbus modification 151459 or modification
151502 has been embodied in production, and on which no escape slide
raft replacements have been made since first flight, are not
affected by the requirement specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.

(j) Parts Installation Limitations

    (1) For airplanes other than those identified in paragraph (i)
of this AD: After accomplishment of the modification required by
paragraph (g) of this AD or after accomplishment of the alternative
modification specified in paragraph (h) of this AD, no person may
install, on any airplane, an escape slide raft specified in table 1
to paragraph (g) of this AD, unless it has been modified in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-25-1723, dated December 17, 2010 (for Model A319,
A320, and A321 series airplanes); Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-
1724, dated December 17, 2010 (for Model A318 series airplanes); or
Air Cruisers Service Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-85, Revision 2, dated
January 3, 2012 (for Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series
airplanes), including the installation of the cable guide assembly
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Air Cruisers
Service Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-56, dated, November 12, 1999.
    (2) For airplanes identified in paragraph (i) of this AD: As the
effective date of this AD, no person may install, on any airplane,
an escape slide raft specified in table 1 to paragraph (g) of this
AD, unless it has been modified in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-1723,
dated December 17, 2010 (for Model A319, A320, and A321 series
airplanes); Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-1724, dated December 17,
2010 (for Model A318 series airplanes); or Air Cruisers Service
Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-85, Revision 2, dated January 3, 2012 (for
Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes), including the
installation of the cable guide assembly in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Air Cruisers Service Bulletin
S.B.A320 004-25-56, dated, November 12, 1999.

(k) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraphs (h) and (j) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using Air Cruisers Service
Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-85, dated November 30, 2010; or Air
Cruisers Service Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-85, Revision 1, dated
September 30, 2011; which are not incorporated by reference in this
AD.

 (l) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1405; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district
office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(m) Related Information

    (1) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2011-0160R1, dated March 15, 2012, and the service
information specified in paragraphs (m)(1)(i) through (m)(1)(iv) of
this AD, for related information.
    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-1723, dated December 17,
2010.
    (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-1724, dated December 17,
2010.
    (iii) Air Cruisers Service Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-85, Revision
2, dated January 3, 2012.
    (iv) Air Cruisers Service Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-56, dated,
November 12, 1999.
    (2) For Air Cruisers service information identified in this AD,
contact Zodiac Services Americas, Cage Code 567V9, 4900 St. Joe
Boulevard, Building 200, Suite 400, College Park, Georgia 30337;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.zodiacaerospace.com.

(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-1723, dated December 17,
2010.
    (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-1724, dated December 17,
2010.
    (iii) Air Cruisers Service Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-85, Revision
2, dated January 3, 2012.
    (iv) Air Cruisers Service Bulletin S.B.A320 004-25-56, dated,
November 12, 1999.
    (3) For Airbus service information identified in this AD,
contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.airbus.com. For Air Cruisers service information
identified in this AD, contact Zodiac Services Americas, Cage Code
567V9, 4900 St. Joe Boulevard, Building 200, Suite 400, College
Park, Georgia 30337; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.zodiacaerospace.com.
    (4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 13, 2012.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-28181 Filed 11-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P