[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 96 (Friday, May 17, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22541-22542]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10225]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-85845; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2019-043]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Delay
the Operative Date of Rule Change Pursuant to SR-CboeBZX-2019-025

May 13, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 7, 2019, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``BZX'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as
a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``BZX Options'')
proposes to delay the operative date of rule change pursuant to SR-
CboeBZX-2019-025.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On April 8, 2019, the Exchange filed a rule filing, SR-CboeBZX-
2019-025, which, among other things, adopted rules to allow Market
Makers to select class appointments rather than registering for series,
as well as amended Market Makers' continuous quoting obligations.\5\
Pursuant to SR-CboeBZX-2019-025, the proposed changes would not be
implemented until on or around May 10, 2019. However, in order to allow
current and potential Market Makers more time to update their systems
to be compatible with the class appointments under amended Rule 22.3
and continuous quoting requirements under amended Rule 22.6(d), the
Exchange now proposed to extend the operative date stated within SR-
CboeBZX-2019-025 to on or around October 1, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85642 (April 16, 2018),
84 FR 16304 (April 18, 2018) (Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Chapter 22 of the Exchange's Rulebook) (SR-CboeBZX-2019-025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\6\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \7\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \8\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change is merely delaying the operative date of a
rule change previously filed with the Commission. This will ensure
Market Makers on BZX Options are given ample time to modify their
systems and update their surveillance controls as necessary in order to
properly meet the amended class appointments and continuous quoting
obligations. As a result, the amendment of the operative date serves to
protect investors by fostering coordination with the Market Makers
facilitating transactions in securities and by removing impediments to
and perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed change will impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed amendment to the
operative date under SR-CboeBZX-2019-025 is merely delaying the
operative date of a rule change previously filed with the Commission.
The proposed delay to the operative date ensures market participants
are allowed sufficient time to implement necessary modifications and
updates to their systems and surveillance controls in order to comply
with the rule change, which ultimately protects investors. The Exchange
believes the proposed delay to the operative date will have no impact
on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \9\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6)\11\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \12\ permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed
rule change may become effective and operative immediately upon filing.
The Exchange states that the waiver will ensure that the rule change
under SR-CboeBZX-2019-025 does not become operative on or around May
10, 2019. The Exchange further states that the waiver will give market
participants an ample time to make necessary modifications and updates
to meet the amended requirements. The Commission believes that waiver
of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby
waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the proposed rule
change as operative upon filing.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CboeBZX-2019-043 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2019-043. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2019-043 and should be submitted
on or before June 7, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-10225 Filed 5-16-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 170 (Thursday, September 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54518-54520]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22440]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-65209; File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2011-61]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Amex LLC; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change Adding Commentary .01 to Rule 925.1NY To Indicate
That Market Makers Will Not Be Obligated To Quote in Adjusted Option
Series and To Clarify an Existing Exception to the Quoting Obligations

August 26, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 16, 2011, NYSE Amex LLC (the ``Exchange'' or ``NYSE Amex'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which
Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to add Commentary .01 to Rule 925.1NY to
indicate that Market Makers will not be obligated to quote in adjusted
option series and to clarify an existing exception to the quoting
obligations. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the
Exchange, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text

of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV
below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposal is to add Commentary .01 to Rule
925.1NY to relieve Market Makers of the obligation to quote in adjusted
option series and to propose a definition of adjusted options series.
The proposal is similar to a rule change recently approved \3\ for
NASDAQ OMX Phlx (``Phlx'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Commission notes that the Phlx proposal was not approved
by the Commission, but rather designated for immediate effectiveness
by Phlx.
    \4\ See Exchange Act Release No. 61095 (December 2, 2009) 74 FR
64786 (December 8, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 925.1NY discusses the quoting obligations that are applicable
to Market Makers on the Exchange. The Rule states that, in addition to
other requirements, Specialists must provide continuous two-sided
quotations throughout the trading day in its appointed issues for 90%
of the time the Exchange is open for trading in each issue. Similarly,
Market Makers must provide continuous two-sided quotations throughout
the trading day in its appointed issues for 60% of the time the
Exchange is open for trading in each issue.
    Under Commentary .03(a) to Rule 903, LEAPS are series added as part
of an extended far term expiration month, and under the same provision,
the Exchange Rules regarding continuity do not apply to index option
series until the time to expiration is less than 12 months, and do not
apply to equity option series or option series on Exchange Traded Fund
Shares until the time to expiration is less than nine months.
    The Exchange proposes to clarify that the exception for LEAPS is an
exception to the obligations in Rule 925.1NY by adding Commentary .01.
The Exchange further proposes to extend the exception to certain
adjusted series,\5\ and to define ``adjusted series'' for the purposes
of Rule 925.1NY. An ``adjusted series'' under the Rule would be defined
as an option series wherein, as a result of a corporate action by the
issuer of the underlying security, one option contract in the series
represents the delivery of other than 100 shares of underlying stock or
Exchange-Traded Fund Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ NYSE Amex Rule 903(g) states ``Option contracts shall be
subject to adjustments in accordance with the Rules of the Options
Clearing Corporation.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After a corporate action and a subsequent adjustment to the
existing options, the series in question are identified by the Options
Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA'') and at OCC with a separate symbol
consisting of the underlying symbol and a numerical appendage. As a
standard procedure, exchanges listing options on an underlying security
which undergoes a corporate action resulting in adjusted series will
list new standard option series across all appropriate expiration
months the day after the existing series are adjusted. The adjusted
series are generally active for a short period of time following
adjustment, but orders to open an options position in the underlying
are almost exclusively placed in the new standard contracts. Although
the adjusted series may not expire for as much as 27 months, in a short
time the adjusted series become inactive. Thus, the burden of quoting
these series generally outweighs the benefit of being appointed in the
class because of the lack of interest in the series by various market
participants.
    On NYSE Amex, such series may not meet the standards to be
considered active, and, under NYSE Amex Rule 970.1NY, the Exchange
shall no longer disseminate quotes in the series. Thus, the current
obligation holds Market Makers to submit quotes in series that are
generally not published to OPRA unless requested.\6\ Since the
obligation to submit electronic quotes upon request of a Trading
Official will continue if the proposed rule is approved, a fair and
orderly market in the inactive series is readily available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Rule 970.1NY states, in part, ``The Exchange may determine
that a series has become active intraday if (i) the series trades at
any options exchange; (ii) NYSE Amex receives an order in the
series; or (iii) NYSE Amex receives a request for quote from a
customer in that series. If a series becomes active intraday, the
Exchange will immediately disseminate quotes in the series to OPRA,
and continue to disseminate quotes for the balance of the trading
day.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has recently noticed requests for withdrawals from
appointment in classes that include adjusted series by Market Makers,
including Specialists, resulting in a reduction in liquidity in these
classes. Market Makers and Specialists that have withdrawn from
assignments in these classes have informed the Exchange that the
withdrawals were based in part on the obligation to continuously quote
adjusted options series whereby the quoting obligations on these often
less frequently traded option series impacted the risk parameters
acceptable to the Market Makers and Specialists. The Market Makers and
Specialists have also expressed that the adjusted nature of these
series also complicates the calculation of an appropriate quote.
    This lack of interest is exacerbated by Market Makers withdrawing
from the appointments which in turn, has caused liquidity (as well as
volume) to be negatively impacted in the affected options classes
listed on the Exchange. The Exchange believes that the proposed
Commentary will ameliorate the liquidity impact by allowing Market
Makers and Specialists to continue their appointments in these option
classes.
    The proposed rule change is similar to the Phlx rule, in that the
Exchange is merely proposing to exclude the adjusted series from the
continuous quoting obligation, but not from other obligations under
Rules 6.37, 6.37A, 6.37B and 6.82. The Phlx rule excludes adjusted
series (and Quarterly Options) from the Streaming Quote Trader's
assignment. Of particular note, the proposal would not excuse a Market
Maker from the obligation, when called upon by a Trading Official, to
submit a single quote or maintain continuous quotes in one or more
series of an option issue within the Market Maker's appointment
whenever, in the judgment of such Trading Official, it is necessary to
do so in the interest of maintaining fair and orderly markets.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See NYSE Amex Rule 925.1NY(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the proposed rule does not excuse the Market Maker from
the obligations to respond with a two-sided, legal width market to a
call for a market by a Floor Broker.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See NYSE Amex Rule 925NY(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The current quoting obligation in such illiquid series is a minor
part of a Market Maker's overall obligation, and the proposed modicum
of relief is mitigated by the obligation to respond to a request for
quote from a Trading Official or a Floor Broker. Because of the lack of
interest in such series, there is little demonstrable benefit to being
a market maker in them other than the ability to maintain market maker
margins for what little activity may occur. In addition, the burden of
continuous quoting in these series is counter to efforts to mitigate
the number of quotes collected and disseminated.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change should incent
Market Makers and Specialists to continue appointments and thereby
expand liquidity in options classes listed on the Exchange to the
benefit of the Exchange and its ATP Holders and public customers.

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that this proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\9\
in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act
\10\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, promote just and equitable principles
of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with the Act
because, on balance, the elimination of the continuous quoting
obligations in adjusted series is a minor change and should not impact
the quality of Amex's market. Among other things, adjusted series are
not common, and trading interest is often very low after the corporate
event has passed. Consequently, continuous quotes in such series
increases quote traffic and burdens systems without a corresponding
benefit. By not requiring Market Makers to continuously quote in such
series, the Exchange's proposal would further its goal of measured
quote mitigation. Further, while they will not be tasked with
continually quoting such series, Market Makers will be obligated to
quote the series when called upon by a Trading Official. In addition, a
MM [sic] will be required to quote the series becomes ``lit'' in
response to a request for quote being received. Accordingly, the
proposal supports the quality of Amex's market by helping to ensure
that Market Makers will continue to be obligated to quote in adjusted
series when the need arises.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2011-61 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2011-61. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSEAmex-2011-61 and should be submitted on or before September 22,
2011.

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant
to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-22440 Filed 8-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 149 (Friday, August 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46935-46936]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18659]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP13-1094-000.
    Applicants: Vector Pipeline L.P.
    Description: ACA Compliance Filing Effective 10-1-2013 to be
effective 10/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 7/25/13.
    Accession Number: 20130725-5012.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/6/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP13-1095-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: ANR Pipeline Company submits tariff filing per
154.203: Annual Charge Adjustment 2013 to be effective 10/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 7/25/13.
    Accession Number: 20130725-5029.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/6/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP13-1096-000.
    Applicants: ANR Storage Company.
    Description: ANR Storage Company submits tariff filing per 154.203:
ACA Filing 2013 to be effective 10/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 7/25/13.
    Accession Number: 20130725-5030.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/6/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP13-1097-000.
    Applicants: Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Storage Tracker Filing--October 1,2012 to be
effective 10/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 7/25/13.
    Accession Number: 20130725-5032.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/6/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP13-1098-000.
    Applicants: Bison Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Bison Pipeline LLC submits tariff filing per 154.203:
ACA Filing 2013 to be effective 10/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 7/25/13.
    Accession Number: 20130725-5033.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/6/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP13-1099-000.
    Applicants: Blue Lake Gas Storage Company.
    Description: Blue Lake Gas Storage Company submits tariff filing
per 154.203: ACA Filing 2013 to be effective 10/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 7/25/13.
    Accession Number: 20130725-5034.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/6/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP13-1100-000.
    Applicants: Gas Transmission Northwest LLC.
    Description: Gas Transmission Northwest LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.203: ACA Filing 2013 to be effective 10/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 7/25/13.
    Accession Number: 20130725-5035.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/6/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP13-1101-000.
    Applicants: Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Par.
    Description: Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership
submits tariff filing per 154.203: ACA Filing 2013 to be effective 10/
1/2013.
    Filed Date: 7/25/13.
    Accession Number: 20130725-5036.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/6/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP13-1102-000.
    Applicants: North Baja Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: North Baja Pipeline, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.203: ACA Filing 2013 to be effective 10/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 7/25/13.
    Accession Number: 20130725-5037.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/6/13.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1083-006.
    Applicants: Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Order No. 776 Compliance Filing to be effective 10/1/
2013.
    Filed Date: 7/24/13.
    Accession Number: 20130724-5090.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/5/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-813-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Motion to Place Accepted and Suspended Tariff Records
into Effect to be effective 7/24/2013.
    Filed Date: 7/24/13.
    Accession Number: 20130724-5060.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/5/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-814-000.
    Applicants: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Motion to Place Accepted and Suspended Tariff Records
into Effect to be effective 7/24/2013.
    Filed Date: 7/24/13.
    Accession Number: 20130724-5059.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/5/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-820-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Motion to Place Accepted and Suspended Tariff Records
into Effect to be effective 7/24/2013.

    Filed Date: 7/24/13.
    Accession Number: 20130724-5061.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/5/13.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 25, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-18659 Filed 8-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: September 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 174)]
[Notices]
[Page 54939-54940]
[DOCID:fr09se10-131]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[DOT Docket No. DOT-OST-2010-0074]

The Future of Aviation Advisory Committee (FAAC) Subcommittee on
Labor and World-Class Workforce; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Transportation, Department of
Transportation.

ACTION: The Future of Aviation Advisory Committee (FAAC) Subcommittee
on Labor and World-Class Workforce; Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation (DOT), Office of the
Secretary of Transportation, announces a meeting of the FAAC
Subcommittee on Labor and World-class Workforce, which will be held at
the JetBlue Airways Hangar, John F. Kennedy International Airport,
Hangar 81A, South Cargo Road, Jamaica, New York 11430 and via
teleconference at<PHONE_NUMBER> (domestic),<PHONE_NUMBER>
(international); participant code 7160616. This notice announces the
date, time, and location of the meeting, which will be open to the
public. The purpose of the FAAC is to provide advice and
recommendations to the Secretary of Transportation to ensure the
competitiveness of the U.S. aviation industry and its capability to
manage effectively the evolving transportation needs, challenges, and
opportunities of the global economy. The subcommittee is charged with
ensuring the availability and quality of a workforce necessary to
support a robust, expanding commercial aviation industry in light of
the changing socioeconomic dynamics of the world's technologically
advanced economies. Among other matters, the subcommittee will examine
three issues affecting the future employment requirements of the
aviation industry: (1) The need for science, technology, engineering,
and math (STEM) skills in the industry; (2) the creation of a culture
of dignity and respect in the workplace; and (3) the impact of Next
Generation Air Transportation System on various workforces.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 23, 2010, from 1 p.m. to
4:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the JetBlue Airways Hangar, John
F. Kennedy International Airport, Hangar 81A, South Cargo Road,
Jamaica, New York 11430 and via teleconference at<PHONE_NUMBER>
(domestic),<PHONE_NUMBER> (international); participant code 7160616.
    Public Access: The meeting is open to the public. (See below for
registration instructions.)
    Public Comments: Persons wishing to offer written comments and
suggestions concerning the activities of the advisory committee or
subcommittee should file comments in the Public Docket (Docket Number
DOT-OST-2010-0074 at http://www.regulations.gov) or alternatively
through the<EMAIL_ADDRESS>e-mail. If comments and suggestions are
intended specifically for the Subcommittee on Labor and World-class
Workforce, the term ``Labor/Workforce'' should be listed in the subject
line of the message. To ensure such comments can be considered by the
subcommittee before its September 23, 2010, meeting, public comments
must be filed by 5 p.m. EDT on Friday, September 17, 2010.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. App. 2), we are giving notice of a meeting of the FAAC
Subcommittee on Labor and World-class Workforce taking place on
September 23, 2010, from 1 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. EDT at the JetBlue Airways
Hangar, John F. Kennedy International Airport, Hangar 81A, South Cargo
Road, Jamaica, New York 11430 and via teleconference at<PHONE_NUMBER>
(domestic), (210) 276-

3097 (international); participant code 7160616. Background information
may be found at the FAAC Web site, located at http://www.dot.gov/faac.
The agenda includes--
    1. Discussion of topics offered by subcommittee members on the
subject of labor and improving the workforce of the aviation industry.
    2. Establishment of a plan and timeline for further work.
    3. Identification of priority issues for the fourth (October 1,
2010) and fifth (November 15, 2010) subcommittee meetings.

Registration

    The meeting can accommodate up to 100 members of the public.
Persons desiring to attend must pre-register through e-mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The term ``Registration: Labor/Workforce'' must be listed
in the subject line of the message, and admission will be limited to
the first 100 persons to pre-register and receive a confirmation of
their pre-registration.
    The telephone conference can accommodate up to 25 members of the
public. Persons desiring to listen to the discussion must preregister
through e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The term ``Registration: Labor/
Workforce'' must be listed in the subject line of the message, and
access will be limited to the first 25 persons to preregister and
receive a confirmation of their preregistration.
    No arrangements are being made for audio or video transmission or
for oral statements or questions from the public at the meeting.
Minutes of the meeting will be taken and will be posted on the FAAC Web
site at http://www.dot.gov/faac/.

Request for Special Accommodation

    The DOT is committed to providing equal access to this meeting for
all participants. If you need alternative formats or services because
of a disability, please send a request to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>with the term
``Special Accommodations'' listed in the subject line of the message by
close of business on Friday, September 17, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terri L. Williams, Director, Center
for Organizational Excellence, Assistant Administrator for Human
Resources, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20591;<PHONE_NUMBER>, extension 7472; or Regis P.
Milan, Office of Aviation Analysis, U.S. Department of Transportation;
Room 86W309, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590; (202)
366-2349.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 3, 2010.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Designated Federal Official, Future of Aviation Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-22425 Filed 9-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


[Federal Register: December 21, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 243)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 67837-67839]
[DOCID:fr21de09-17]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-1036; Airspace Docket No. 09-AAL-17]

Proposed Revision of Class E Airspace; Iliamna, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to revise Class E airspace at Iliamna,
AK. Amended Area Navigation (RNAV) Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures (SIAPs), conventional SIAPs, and an Obstacle Departure
Procedure (ODP) at Iliamna Airport have made this action necessary to
enhance safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR)
operations.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 4, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the proposal to the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-
0001. You must identify the docket number FAA-2009-1036/Airspace Docket
No. 09-AAL-17, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit
comments on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review
the public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and
any final disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket
Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527) is on the plaza level of the
Department of Transportation NASSIF Building at the above address.
    An informal docket may also be examined during normal business
hours at the office of the Manager, Safety, Alaska Flight Service
Operations, Federal Aviation Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box
14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7587.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Rolf, Federal Aviation
Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7587;
telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet address: http://www.faa.gov/about/
office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/systemops/fs/
alaskan/rulemaking/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2009-1036/
Airspace Docket No. 09-AAL-17.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://
www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_
amendments/.
    Additionally, any person may obtain a copy of this notice by
submitting a request to the Federal Aviation Administration, Office of
Air Traffic Airspace Management, ATA-400, 800 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591 or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. Communications must
identify both docket numbers for this notice. Persons interested in
being placed on a mailing list for future NPRM's should contact the
FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>, to request a copy of
Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Distribution
System, which describes the application procedure.

The Proposal

    This action proposes to amend Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) part 71 by revising Class E airspace at Iliamna Airport, AK,
to accommodate amended RNAV SIAPs at Iliamna Airport. This Class E
airspace would provide adequate controlled airspace upward from the
surface, and from 700 and 1,200 feet above the surface, for the safety
and management of IFR operations at Iliamna Airport.
    The Class E2 surface areas are published in paragraph 6002 in FAA
Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed
August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace areas
designated as 700/1200 foot transition areas are published in paragraph
6005 in FAA Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document would be subsequently published in
the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore --(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Because this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart 1, Section 40103, Sovereignty and use of
airspace. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing
regulations to ensure the safe and efficient use of the navigable
airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because
it proposes to revise Class E airspace at Iliamna Airport, Iliamna, AK,
and represents the FAA's continuing effort to safely and efficiently
use the navigable airspace.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15,
2009, is to be amended as follows:
* * * * *

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

AAL AK E2 Iliamna, AK [Revised]

Iliamna Airport, AK
    (Lat. 59[deg]45'20'' N., long. 154[deg]55'04'' W.)
Iliamna NDB
    (Lat. 59[deg]44'53'' N., long. 154[deg]54'35'' W.)

    Within a 4.9-mile radius of the Iliamna Airport, AK, and within
2.5 miles each side of the 200[deg] bearing of the Iliamna NDB,
extending from the 4.9-mile radius to 7 miles south of the Iliamna
Airport, AK. This Class E airspace area is effective during the
specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Airport/Facility Directory.
* * * * *

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Extending Upward from 700 Feet or
More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AAL AK E5 Iliamna, AK [Revised]

Iliamna Airport, AK
    (Lat. 59[deg]45'20'' N., long. 154[deg]55'04'' W.)
Iliamna NDB
    (Lat. 59[deg]44'53'' N., long. 154[deg]54'35'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7.2-mile radius of the Iliamna Airport, AK, and within 4
west and 8 miles east of the 200[deg] bearing of the Iliamna NDB,
extending from the 7.2-mile radius to 16 miles south of the Iliamna
Airport, AK; and that airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet
above the surface within a 73-mile radius of the Iliamna Airport,
AK.
* * * * *

     Issued in Anchorage, AK, on December 3, 2009.
Michael A. Tarr,
Acting Manager, Alaska Flight Services Information Area Group.
[FR Doc. E9-30281 Filed 12-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, DC 20460

OFFICE OF  PREVENTION, PESTICIDES,  AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES

February 21, 2007

MEMORANDUM:

Subject: 	DIETARY EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT OF OCTHILINONE USE OF INDIRECT
FOOD CONTACT SURFACES

From:	A. Najm Shamim, PhD., Chemist

	Regulatory Management Branch II

	Antimicrobials Division (7510P)

To:	Talia Lindheimer, Risk Assessor for Octhilinone RED

	Risk Assessment and Science Support Branch

	Antimicrobials Division (7510P)

				And

	Diane Isbell, CRM for Octhilinone RED

	Regulatory Management Branch II

	Antimicrobials Division (7510P)

Thru:	Mark Hartman, Chief

	Regulatory Management Branch II

	Antimicrobials Division (7510P)

DP Barcode:

Chemical Name:      2-n-Octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (Octhilinone or OIT)

PC Code:		099901

CAS Registry No.     26530-20-1

Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment:

AD’s label reviews have shown that Octhilinone has the following use
patterns/use sites. Some of which may require  indirect food contact
dietary exposure assessments.: Adhesives ; fillers, wood coatings ,
chaulking, sealants, wall paper, leather and hide, textiles, cooling
towers, fabrics, polymer compounds. Most of the uses listed do not fall
in the category of food use, except for the use in adhesives. Following
labels lists the adhesive use of Octhilinone:

				Table 1

Product Name	EPA Reg#

Skane M-8	707-100

Kathon 893TP 25	707-205

Sanitized: TB83-35	309-217

Ultra Fresh DM-25	10466-32

Ultra Fresh FT-7	10466-42

Thor: Acticide OTW	67071-31

As a matter of policy, AD has assessed adhesive use as an indirect food
use.  Since it is likely that adhesives may end up in the food packaging
materials, and this may result in the migration of the pesticide into
the food indirectly.  For the indirect food dietary assessment, AD has
adopted Food & Drug Administration (FDA) methodology.  For adhesive use,
FDA has provided guidance for dietary estimation that a maximum of 7 ppb
of a pesticide is likely to migrate from the food packaging materials
into the food. The quantity of 7 ppb can be used to calculate the
Estimated Daily Intake (EDI), Daily Dietary Dose (DDD), and using the
acute and dietary end points from toxicity data, one calculates the
overall risks to general and subgroups of populations ( % aPAD, and %
cPAD).

For the present case: FDA’s assumptions are: 1) Maximum migration of
Octhilinone into food from adhesive use = 7 ppb = 7µg/g; 2) Maximum
adult food intake = 3000 g; 3) Maximum food intake for a child = 1500 g.

In general, % PAD =  DDD/% a PAD or % cPAD.

AD’s End Point Selection Committee did not have enough toxicity data
to select acute or chronic dietary end points.

					Table 2

Use	Dietary Conc. (ppb)	Estimated Daily Intake (EDI) µg/p/day	Daily
Dietary Dose (DDD) mg/kg/day

	% aPAD	% cPAD

Adhesive	7	Adult: 7µg/g x 3000g = 21 µg/p/day

Child: 7 µg/g x 1500 g = 10.5 µg/p/day	Adult: 21 µg/70 kg/day =
0.0003 mg/kg/day

Child: 10.5 µg/15kg/day = 0.0007 mg/kg/day	Adult: no data. No concerns.

Child: no data. No concerns.	Adult: no data. No concerns.

Child: no data. No concerns

Hence the Agency has no dietary concerns, acute or chronic from the use
of Octhilinone in adhesives.

RMBII file room: Octhilinone: Dietary exposure assessment. Najm Shamim

 PAGE

Page   PAGE  3  of   NUMPAGES  3


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 9, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41005-41009]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16394]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2013 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0602; Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-010-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Vulcanair S.p.A. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Vulcanair S.p.A. (type certificate previously held by Partenavia)
Models P 68, P 68B, P 68C, P 68C-TC, P 68 ``OBSERVER,'' P68TC
``OBSERVER,'' and P68 ``OBSERVER 2'' airplanes that would supersede AD
2008-24-11, Amendment 39-15751. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as cracking and/or corrosion of the wing spar, which could
result in structural failure of the wing. We are issuing this proposed
AD to require actions to address the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 23, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Vulcanair Airworthiness Office, Via G Pascoli, 7, 80026 Casoria, Italy;
phone: +39 081 59 18 135; fax: +39 081 59 18 172; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.vulcanair.com/page-view.php?pagename=Service Bulletins. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Safety
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0602;
Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-010-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On November 19, 2008, we issued AD 2008-24-11, Amendment 39-15751
(73 FR 72314; November 28, 2008). That AD required actions intended to
address an unsafe condition on the Vulcanair S.p.A. Models P 68, P 68B,
P 68C, P 68C-TC, P 68 ``OBSERVER,'' AP68TP300 ``SPARTACUS,'' P68TC
``OBSERVER,'' AP68TP 600 ``VIATOR,'' and P68 ``OBSERVER 2'' airplanes.
    Since we issued AD 2008-24-11 (73 FR 72314; November 28, 2008),
Vulcanair S.p.A. developed modification kits to repair certain lower
spar caps. They also developed a maintenance manual supplement with
special inspections of the wing and stabilator structures and new
limitations for the wing structure.
    The FAA also realized that the Models AP68TP300 ''SPARTACUS'' and
AP68TP 600 ''VIATOR'' were inadvertenly included in AD 2008-24-11.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued AD
No.: 2010-0051, dated March 25, 2010 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:

    Safe Life Limits of the wing structure of P.68 Series aeroplanes
have now been extended up to a maximum of 23 900 Flight Hours (FH),
depending on the condition of the spar lower cap angles and on the
embodiment of some modification kits. Furthermore, special
inspections of the wing and stabilator structures, different from
those previously required by EASA AD 2007-0027, have also been
introduced. This change has been developed by Vulcanair under change
No. MOD. P68/144 approved by EASA with approval No. 10028661 on 02
February 2010.
    Consequently this AD, which supersedes EASA AD 2007-0027, allows
the implementation of the extended Safe Life Limits, in accordance
with the instructions of Vulcanair SB 162, and requires the
accomplishment of special inspections for the wing and stabilator
structures, in accordance with the Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM)
Supplement part number (P/N) NOR 10.771-52.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
    EASA AD No.: 2010-0051, dated March 25, 2010; Vulcanair S.p.A.
Maintenance Manual Supplement NOR10.771-52, dated March 1, 2010;
Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010;
Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Instruction No. 88, dated March 1, 2010; and
Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Instruction No. 89, dated March 1, 2010, base
the extended safe life limits on repetitive inspections and other
required preventive and corrective actions that under certain
conditions allow flight with known cracks in critical structure. The
FAA's Small Airplane Directorate does not allow further flight with
known cracks in critical structure without additional substantiating
data. Advisory Circular (AC) 23-13A, Chapter 6, dated September 29,
2005, describes what additional data is required to allow flight with
known cracks (found on the Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf).

Relevant Service Information

    Vulcanair S.p.A. has issued Maintenance Manual Supplement
NOR10.771-52, dated March 1, 2010; Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Bulletin
No. 162, dated March 1, 2010; Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Instruction No.
88, dated March 1, 2010; and Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Instruction No.
89, dated March 1, 2010. The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 75 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 60 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $382,500, or $5,100 per product.
    We estimate that the wing replacement would take about 300 work-
hours and require parts costing $443,406, for a cost of $468,906 per
product. Wing replacement is only required when the wing structure
exceeds the safe life established in this AD.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions for
kit installation would take about 120 work-hours and require parts
costing $2,595, for a cost of $12,795 per product. We have no way of
determining the number of products that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    This section presents the initial regulatory flexibility analysis
(IRFA) that was done for this action. We have reworded and reformatted
for Federal Register publication purposes. The IRFA in its original
form can be found in the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

Introduction and Purpose of This Analysis

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) (RFA)
establishes ``as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall
endeavor, consistent with the objectives of the rule and of applicable
statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to regulation.'' To achieve this principle, the RFA requires
agencies to solicit and consider flexible regulatory proposals and to
explain the rationale for their actions to assure that such proposals
are seriously considered.'' The RFA covers a wide-range of small
entities, including small businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and
small governmental jurisdictions.
    Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a rule will
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. If the agency determines that it will, the agency must
prepare an IRFA as described in the RFA.
    Section 603(a) of the RFA requires that each initial regulatory
flexibility analysis contain the following information:
     A description of the reasons action by the agency is being
considered;
     A succinct statement of the objectives of, and legal basis
for, the proposed rule;
     A description of and, where feasible, an estimate of the
number of small entities to which the proposed rule will apply;
     A description of the projected reporting, recordkeeping
and other compliance requirements of the proposed rule, including an
estimate of the classes of small entities which will be subject to the
requirement and the type of professional skills necessary for
preparation of the report or record;
     To the extent practicable, an identification of all
relevant Federal rules which may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
the proposed rule; and
     A description of any significant alternatives to the
proposed rule which accomplish the stated objectives of applicable
statues and which minimize any significant economic impact of the
proposed rule on small entities.
    The following represents a detailed description of the six items
required by section 603(a) of the RFA.
1. A Description of the Reasons Action by the Agency Is Being
Considered
    This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by EASA and would supersede AD 2008-24-
11, Amendment 39-15751 (73 FR 72314; November 28, 2008). AD 2008-24-11
established safe limits for the wing structure of Vulcanair P 68 series
airplanes and required repetitive inspection and repair of the wing and
stabilator structures when the airplanes reach safe life limits.
Operation beyond existing conservative safe limits (with inspections
and repair) is allowed pending establishment of final safe limits and a
terminating action.
    The proposed AD significantly increases wing structure life limits
(in a few cases requiring kit modification of

the wing structure), but establishes a terminating action requiring
replacement of the wing structure and wing fuselage attachments and
bolts when new established safe limits are reached. Prior to the wing
structure safe life limit being reached, the proposed AD also requires
special inspections of the wing structure with time limits, since new,
of 6,000; 12,000; and 18,000 flight hours.
2. Objectives of, and Legal Basis for, the Proposed Rule
    Title 49 of the U.S. Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the FAA's authority. We propose
this rulemaking under the authority described in subtitle VII, part A,
subpart III, section 44701, ``General requirements.'' Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices,
methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in
air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on the airplanes identified in this AD.
3. A Description of and an Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to
Which the Proposed Rule Will Apply
    This proposed rule would affect 67 U.S.-registered airplanes, of
which 40 are owned by corporations, 8 by individuals, 2 by the Federal
Government, and 17 by state governments. Of the 48 airplanes held by
private sector parties, one financing firm owns 2 of them, and 2
operators each own 2 of them. The remaining 36 airplanes are owned by
36 corporations and individuals. The FAA believes that all, or nearly
all, of these private sector owners are privately held small firms, for
which we cannot obtain financial records. We conclude that the proposed
rule would affect a substantial number of small entities.
4. Reporting, Record Keeping, and Other Compliance Requirements of the
Proposed Rule
    Small entities will incur no new reporting and record-keeping
requirements as a result of this rule.
    The additional requirements of the proposed AD compared to AD 2008-
24-11, Amendment 39-15751 (73 FR 72314; November 28, 2008) are the
special wing structure inspections at 6,000; 12,000; and 18,000 flight
hours; the terminating action to replace the wing structure when the
wing structure safe limit is reached; and, for airplanes with serial
numbers 1-256 for which a spar crack was found under previous
Partenavia Costruzioni Aeronautiche S.p.A. Service Bulletin No. 65,
Revison 3, dated September 30, 1985, replacement of the four main spar
lower cap angles using Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Bulletin No. 162, dated
March 1, 2010. The costs of the required actions provided in the
proposed AD are as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost of
                   Requirement                      Work-hours      Labor cost       materials      Total cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special inspections.............................              60          $5,100
Wing structure replacement......................             300          25,500        $443,406        $468,906
Replacement of lower spar cap angles with                    120          10,200           2,595          12,795
 Service Bulletin 162 (S/N 1-256)...............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 1 of the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in this AD.

    The requirement to replace the wing structure, at considerable
cost, occurs when the airplanes are old and have low value, often less
than the cost of wing structure replacement. Therefore, in many cases
airplane retirement is the least cost alternative, in which case the
effective cost of the requirement is the loss in airplane value net of
salvage value. The requirement to replace the lower spar cap angles
applies to at most ten U.S.-registered airplanes and only if a front
spar crack was previously found under Partenavia Costruzioni
Aeronautiche S.p.A. Service Bulletin No. 65, Revison 3, dated September
30, 1985. The expected present value cost of this requirement is thus
minimal. The requirement for special inspections at 6,000; 12,000; and
18,000 flight hours applies to all AD-affected airplanes.

Economic Impact on Small Entities

    Since we have no financial information of the privately held firms
that constitute most of the operators of the affected airplanes, we
assess the economic impact of the proposed rule using airplane values.
As the Vulcanair P 68 airplanes are not listed in the Aircraft Bluebook
Price Digest, we undertook an internet search and found that the resale
value of older P 68 airplanes, manufactured between 1975 and 1984
ranged from about $80,000 to $300,000. Many of these airplanes will be
subject to the special inspection at 6,000 hours or even the special
inspection at 12,000 hours. Using a significant economic impact
criterion of 2 percent of airplane value, for operators of many of
these airplanes there is a significant economic impact based on just
one $5,100 inspection. Taking into account the present value cost of
two to three possible future inspections and possible repair, as well
as the present value cost of forced early retirement, there is a
significant economic impact on most if not all of these operators.
    Therefore, we conclude that this proposed rule will have a
significant impact on a substantial number of firms.
5. Duplicative, Overlapping or Conflicting Federal Rules
    The FAA is unaware of any Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this proposed rule.
6. Significant Alternatives to the Proposed Rule
    Because of an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop
on the airplanes identified in this proposed AD, there is no feasible
significant alternative to requiring the actions of this proposed AD.
The FAA invites public comment on this determination.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),

    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will have a significant economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15751 (73 FR
72314; November 28, 2008), and adding the following new AD:

Vulcanair S.p.A. (Type Certificate Previously Held by Partenavia):
Docket No. FAA-2013-0602; Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-010-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by August 23, 2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 2008-24-11, Amendment 39-15751 (73 FR
72314; November 28, 2008).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Vulcanair S.p.A. Models P 68, P 68B, P 68C, P
68C-TC, P 68 ``OBSERVER,'' P68TC ``OBSERVER,'' and P68 ``OBSERVER
2'' airplanes, serial numbers (S/N) 01 through 429, S/Ns 431 through
452, and S/N 454, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 57: Wings.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as cracking and/or
corrosion of the wing spar. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct cracking and corrosion of the wing spars, which, if not
corrected, could result in structural failure of the wing.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions specified in
paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(8) of this AD, to include all
subparagraphs.
    (1) Within 10 days after the effective date of this AD,
incorporate Vulcanair S.p.A. Maintenance Manual Supplement
NOR10.771-52, dated March 1, 2010, into the FAA-approved maintenance
program (maintenance manual) following Vulcanair S.p.A. Service
Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010.
    (2) Within 10 days after the effective date of this AD,
determine the safe life limit of the wing structure as follows:
    (i) For all rows except rows (c) and (e) in table 1, of
paragraph 1.3, of Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Bulletin No. 162, dated
March 1, 2010, use the safe life limit specified in the appropriate
row of the table; and
    (ii) For rows (c) and (e) in table 1, of paragraph 1.3, of
Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010,
before further flight, you must modify the wing structure following
Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010.
After modification, use the safe life limit specified in the
appropriate row of the table.
    (3) Before reaching the life limit as determined in paragraph
(f)(2) of this AD, before further flight, you must replace the wing
structure and wing fuselage attachments and bolts with new ones. Do
the replacement following Vulcanair S.p.A Maintenance Manual
Supplement NOR10.771-52, dated March 1, 2010, as specified in the
instructions in WORK PROCEDURE, paragraph 2 of Vulcanair S.p.A.
Service Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010.
    (4) Do an initial inspection of the wing structure as specified
in the instructions in paragraph 2.1 of Vulcanair S.p.A. Service
Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010, at the applicable times as
specified in paragraphs (f)(4)(i) and (f)(4)(ii). Repetitively
thereafter inspect and replace the wing structure following the
limitations in Vulcanair S.p.A. Maintenance Manual Supplement
NOR10.771-52, dated March 1, 2010.
    (i) For aircraft that have not exceeded the safe life limit
hours time-in-service (TIS) on the wing structure as determined in
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD: Before accumulating 6,000 hours TIS on
the wing structure or within 100 hours TIS after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs later, follow Vulcanair S.p.A.
Maintenance Manual Supplement NOR10.771-52, dated March 1, 2010. You
may take unless already done credit for this inspection if inspected
in compliance with AD 2008-24-11 (73 FR 72314; November 28, 2008);
or
    (ii) For aircraft that have exceeded the safe life limit hours
TIS on the wing structure as determined in paragraph (f)(2) of this
AD: Within 100 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD, follow
Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010.
    (5) Before accumulating 8,500 hours TIS since new on the
stabilator, within 500 hours TIS after January 2, 2009 (the
effective date of AD 2008-24-11 (73 FR 72314; November 28, 2008)),
or within 500 hours TIS from the last inspection done in compliance
with AD 2008-24-11, whichever occurs later, do the initial
inspection of the stabilator following Vulcanair S.p.A. Maintenance
Manual Supplement NOR10.771-52, paragraph 2.2, dated March 1, 2010,
or Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Bulletin No. 120 Rev. 1, dated June 7,
2006. Repetitively thereafter inspect the stabilator following the
limitations in Vulcanair S.p.A. Maintenance Manual Supplement
NOR10.771-52, dated March 1, 2010.
    (6) If any cracks are found during the inspections required in
paragraphs (f)(4) and/or (f)(5) of this AD, before further flight,
modify the wing structure following Vulcanair S.p.A. Service
Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010.
    (7) For certain Model P 68 airplanes, AD 2009-24-03, Amendment
39-16090 (74 FR 62211, November 27, 2009) requires repetitive
inspections of the front and rear wing spars for cracks and
modification if cracks are found. The modification terminates the
repetitive inspections required in AD 2009-24-03 and may be done
regardless if cracks are found. The actions of AD 2009-24-03 are
independent of this AD action and remain in effect.
    (8) EASA AD No.: 2010-0051, dated March 25, 2010; Vulcanair
S.p.A. Maintenance Manual Supplement NOR10.771-52, dated March 1,
2010; Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1,
2010; Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Instruction No. 88, dated March 1,
2010; and Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Instruction No. 89, dated March
1, 2010, base the required preventive and corrective actions on
allowing flight with known cracks in critical structure. The FAA's
Small Airplane Directorate does not allow further flight with known
cracks in critical structure without additional substantiating data.
Advisory Circular (AC) 23-13A,Chapter 6, dated September 29, 2005,
describes what additional data is required to allow flight with
known cracks (found on the Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf).

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Safety Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal
inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(h) Related Information

    (1) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.
2010-0051,

dated March 25, 2010, which may be found in the AD docket on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; Vulcanair S.p.A. Service
Instruction No. 88, dated March 1, 2010; and Vulcanair S.p.A.
Service Instruction No. 89, dated March 1, 2010, for related
information.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Vulcanair Airworthiness Office, Via G Pascoli, 7, 80026 Casoria,
Italy; phone: +39 081 59 18 135; fax: +39 081 59 18 172; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.vulcanair.com/page-view.php?pagename=Service-Bulletins.
    (3) You may view this service information at FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on July 2, 2013.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2013-16394 Filed 7-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P