[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 194 (Monday, October 7, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 53556]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21709]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. FAA-2019-61]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; Southern
Utah University

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations. The
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and
participation in, the FAA's exemption process. Neither publication of
this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary
is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final
disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before October 28, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2019-0744
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140,
West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brent Hart<PHONE_NUMBER>, Office of
Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 30, 2019.
Brandon Roberts,
Acting Executive Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2019-0744.
    Petitioner: Southern Utah University.
    Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: Sec.  141.38.
    Description of Relief Sought: To allow Southern Utah University
(SUU) to operate SUU's aviation program under 14 CFR part 141 training
at Cedar City Regional Airport (KCDC) during a construction project if
performance requirements are met under current aircraft weight,
temperature, and wind conditions for the time of the operation.

[FR Doc. 2019-21709 Filed 10-4-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 67359]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26962]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER14-166-000]

Rigby Energy Resources, LP; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding,
of Rigby Energy Resources, LP's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability is November 19, 2013.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 29, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-26962 Filed 11-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI  48105-2498

									     OFFICE OF

									AIR AND RADIATION

1/28/16

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Test Procedure Review with Cummins, Volvo, Navistar, Paccar, Daimler Eaton and Allison

FROM: James Sanchez

TO:  Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and

Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles - Phase 2 - Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0827

This memo documents communication on January 28, 2016 between representatives of Cummins, Volvo, Navistar, Paccar, Eaton, Allison, Daimler, Hino, EMA and EPA to discuss heavy-duty test procedures proposed in the Phase 2 greenhouse gas and fuel efficiency standards for heavy-duty vehicles notice of proposed rulemaking.  The draft document is attached.

Participants:

Allison – Mike Howenstein

Cummins – Jackie Yeager

Daimler – Anirban Sett, Gerald Freitag, David Kayes, Inderpal Singh

Eaton –

EMA – Tim Blubaugh

EPA – Houshun Zhang

Hino –

Navistar – Dave Gardner, Laura Ricart, Matt Hunkler

PACCAR – Mark Malowicki

Volvo – Marc Miller, Tony Greszler, Yuesheng He

Discussion and follow-up items (with owner's name in bold):

Open questions/work planning – All

Updated per attached document

PACCAR planning to run test soon but found issue with speed/load cycle generated by GEM

EPA looking for mfr input on vehicles to be excluded (for example, vehicles geared to run only below 55 mph)

GEM has capability to accept more than 8-9 map points if that is allowed

Other topics – All

GEM

Debugging version includes regression model for fuel mass as a function of N/V and cycle work

Road grade

Houshun requested Volvo to look at mass of 70k, 60k, 0 payload – Marc

Daimler is in process of doing their own analysis

Topics for future calls:

(2/11) N13 365 results – Houshun

(TBD) Impact of mass in road grade analysis – Volvo

(2/11) SEA process – All


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73313-73314]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26000]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-D-0811]

Enforcement Policy Regarding Investigational New Drug
Requirements for Use of Fecal Microbiota for Transplantation To Treat
Clostridioides difficile Infection Not Responsive to Standard
Therapies; Guidance for Industry; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
announcing the availability of a final guidance entitled ``Enforcement
Policy Regarding Investigational New Drug Requirements for Use of Fecal
Microbiota for Transplantation to Treat Clostridioides difficile
Infection Not Responsive to Standard Therapies; Guidance for
Industry.'' The guidance document informs members of the medical and
scientific community and other interested persons notice that, at this
time, we intend to exercise enforcement discretion with respect to the
investigational new drug application (IND) requirements for the use of
fecal microbiota for transplantation (FMT) to treat Clostridioides
difficile (C. difficile) infection not responding to standard therapies
under limited circumstances described in the guidance. The guidance
announced in this notice finalizes the draft guidance entitled
``Enforcement Policy Regarding Investigational New Drug Requirements
for Use of Fecal Microbiota for Transplantation to Treat Clostridium
difficile Infection Not Responsive to Standard Therapies'' dated March
2016, and supersedes the guidance entitled ``Enforcement Policy
Regarding Investigational New Drug Requirements for Use of Fecal
Microbiota for Transplantation to Treat Clostridium difficile Infection
Not Responsive to Standard Therapies'' dated July 2013.

DATES: The announcement of the guidance is published in the Federal
Register on November 29, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit either electronic or written comments on
Agency guidances at any time as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2013-D-0811 for ``Enforcement Policy Regarding Investigational New
Drug Requirements for Use of Fecal Microbiota for Transplantation to
Treat Clostridium difficile Infection Not Responsive to Standard
Therapies; Final Guidance for Industry.'' Received comments will be
placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential
Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at
the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.

    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
    Submit written requests for single copies of the guidance to the
Office of Communication, Outreach and Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist the office in processing
your requests. The guidance may also be obtained by mail by calling
CBER at 1-800-835-4709 or<PHONE_NUMBER>. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phillip Kurs, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-7911.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a document entitled
``Enforcement Policy Regarding Investigational New Drug Requirements
for Use of Fecal Microbiota for Transplantation to Treat Clostridioides
difficile Infection Not Responsive to Standard Therapies; Guidance for
Industry.'' The guidance informs members of the medical and scientific
community and other interested persons of our policy regarding the IND
requirements for the use of FMT to treat C. difficile infection not
responding to standard therapies. In light of the considerations
described in the guidance, at this time, FDA intends to exercise
enforcement discretion with respect to the applicable IND requirements
when the FMT product is not obtained from a stool bank and where: (1)
the licensed health care provider treating the patient obtains
appropriate consent from the patient or his or her legally authorized
representative for the use of FMT product. The consent should include,
at a minimum, a statement that the use of FMT products to treat C.
difficile is investigational and a discussion of the product's
reasonably foreseeable risks; (2) the stool donor and stool are
qualified by screening and testing performed under the direction of the
licensed health care provider for the purpose of providing the FMT
product for treatment of the patient; and (3) the use of the FMT
product does not raise reported safety concerns or potential
significant safety concerns (e.g., concerns regarding inappropriate
storage or handling or concerns regarding administration of product
collected without appropriate screening or testing).
    FDA has developed this policy to help facilitate access to FMT for
patients with C. difficile infection not responding to standard
therapies, while addressing and controlling the risks that centralized
manufacturing in stool banks presents to individuals receiving such
products. We have concluded this policy appropriately balances
considerations regarding patient safety and facilitating access to
unapproved FMT products for unmet medical needs. FDA will continue to
work with sponsors who intend to submit INDs for use of FMT to treat C.
difficile infection not responding to standard therapies.
    In the Federal Register of March 1, 2016 (81 FR 10632), FDA
announced the availability of the draft guidance entitled ``Enforcement
Policy Regarding Investigational New Drug Requirements for Use of Fecal
Microbiota for Transplantation to Treat Clostridium difficile Infection
Not Responsive to Standard Therapies'' dated March 2016. FDA received
several comments on the draft guidance and those comments were
considered as the guidance was finalized. In the Federal Register on
September 11, 2019 (84 FR 47911), FDA announced a part 15 hearing on
the Use of Fecal Microbiota for Transplantation to Treat Clostridium
difficile Infection Not Responsive to Standard Therapies. The hearing
was held on November 4, 2019. FDA considered input from stakeholders
received as part of the hearing as the guidance was finalized. A
summary of changes includes changes to make clear that situations where
use of an FMT product raises reported safety concerns or potential
significant safety concerns are outside the scope of this enforcement
policy; clarification of the products that are the subject of the
guidance; and other editorial changes to improve clarity. The guidance
announced in this notice finalizes the draft guidance entitled
``Enforcement Policy Regarding Investigational New Drug Requirements
for Use of Fecal Microbiota for Transplantation to Treat Clostridium
difficile Infection Not Responsive to Standard Therapies'' dated March
2016, and supersedes the guidance entitled ``Enforcement Policy
Regarding Investigational New Drug Requirements for Use of Fecal
Microbiota for Transplantation to Treat Clostridium difficile Infection
Not Responsive to Standard Therapies'' dated July 2013.
    This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
current thinking of FDA on ``Enforcement Policy Regarding
Investigational New Drug Requirements for Use of Fecal Microbiota for
Transplantation to Treat Clostridioides difficile Infection Not
Responsive to Standard Therapies.'' It does not establish any rights
for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    While this guidance contains no collection of information, it does
refer to previously approved FDA collections of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) is not
required for this guidance. The previously approved collections of
information are subject to review by OMB under the PRA. The collections
of information in 21 CFR part 312 have been approved under control
number 0910-0014. The collections of information in 21 CFR part 50 have
been approved under OMB control number 0910-0130.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the internet may obtain the guidance at
either https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information-biologics/biologics-guidances,
https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents, or https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: November 22, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-26000 Filed 11-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: December 31, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 251)]
[Notices]
[Page 80447-80448]
[DOCID:fr31de08-98]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon written request, copies available from: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549-0213.

Extension: Rule 12d2-1; OMB Control No. 3235-0081; SEC File No. 270-
98.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a
request for extension of the previously approved collections of
information for the following rule: Rule 12d2-1 (17 CFR 240.12d2-1).
    On February 12, 1935, the Commission adopted Rule 12d2-1,\1\ under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (``Act''),
which sets forth the conditions and procedures under which a security
may be suspended from trading under Section 12(d) of the Act.\2\ Rule
12d2-1 provides the procedures by which a national securities exchange
may suspend from trading a security that is listed and registered on
the exchange. Under Rule 12d2-1, an exchange is permitted to suspend
from trading a listed security in accordance with its rules, and must
promptly notify the Commission of any such suspension, along with the
effective date and the reasons for the suspension.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98 (February 12,
1935).
    \2\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 7011 (February 5,
1963), 28 FR 1506 (February 16, 1963).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any such suspension may be continued until such time as the
Commission may determine that the suspension is designed to evade the
provisions of Section 12(d) of the Act and Rule 12d2-2 thereunder.\3\
During the continuance of such suspension under Rule 12d2-1, the
exchange is required to notify the Commission promptly of any change in
the reasons for the suspension. Upon the restoration to trading of any
security suspended under Rule 12d2-1, the exchange must notify the
Commission promptly of the effective date of such restoration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Rule 12d2-2 prescribes the circumstances under which a
security may be delisted from an exchange and withdrawn from
registration under Section 12(b) of the Act, and provides the
procedures for taking such action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The trading suspension notices serve a number of purposes. First,
they inform the Commission that an exchange has suspended from trading
a listed security or reintroduced trading in a previously suspended
security. They also provide the Commission with information necessary
for it to determine that the suspension has been accomplished in
accordance with the rules of the exchange, and to verify that the
exchange has not evaded the requirements of Section 12(d) of the Act
and Rule 12d2-2 thereunder by improperly employing a trading
suspension. Without Rule 12d2-1, the Commission would be unable to
fully implement these statutory responsibilities.
    There are ten national securities exchanges that are subject to
Rule 12d2-1. The burden of complying with Rule 12d2-1 is not evenly
distributed among the exchanges, however, since there are many more
securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., the NASDAQ
Stock Exchange, and the American Stock Exchange LLC than on the other
exchanges.\4\ However, for purposes of this filing, the Commission
staff has assumed that the number of responses is evenly divided among
the exchanges. There are approximately 1,500 responses under Rule 12d2-
1 for the purpose of suspension of trading from the national securities
exchanges each year, the resultant aggregate annual reporting hour
burden would be, assuming on average one-half reporting hour per
response, 750 annual burden hours for all exchanges. The related costs
associated with these burden hours are $41,625.00.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ In fact, some exchanges do not file any trading suspension
reports in a given year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The collection of information obligations imposed by Rule 12d2-1
are mandatory. The response will be available to the public and will
not be kept confidential.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Comments should be directed to (i) Desk Officer for the Securities
and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or by sending an e-mail to: Shagufta_
Ahmed@omb.eop.gov); and (ii) Charles Boucher Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley Martinson,
6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted within 30 days of this
notice.

    Dated: December 22, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-31092 Filed 12-30-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 235 (Friday, December 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57968-57969]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26498]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP18-224-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Capacity Release
Agreements--12/1/2017 to be effective 12/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/1/17.
    Accession Number: 20171201-5029.

    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/13/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-225-000.
    Applicants: Portland Natural Gas Transmission System.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: C2C Negotiated Rate Agreements
to be effective 12/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/1/17.
    Accession Number: 20171201-5065.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/13/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-226-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: AVC Retainage Tracker to be
effective 1/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 12/1/17.
    Accession Number: 20171201-5079.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/13/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-227-000.
    Applicants: Cameron Interstate Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Cameron Interstate Pipeline Annual
Adjustment of Fuel Retainage Percentage to be effective 1/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 12/1/17.
    Accession Number: 20171201-5176.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/13/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-228-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to Provisions for
FL&U and Power Cost Tracker to be effective 4/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 12/1/17.
    Accession Number: 20171201-5195.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/13/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-229-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Administrative Updates to
Tariff to be effective 1/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 12/1/17.
    Accession Number: 20171201-5265.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/13/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-230-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Access South Adair Southwest
Lebanon Extension Compliance Filing to be effective 1/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 12/1/17.
    Accession Number: 20171201-5274.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/13/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-231-000.
    Applicants: Sierrita Gas Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Non-Conforming Agreement
Filing (CFEI) to be effective 1/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 12/1/17.
    Accession Number: 20171201-5310.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/13/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 4, 2017.
 Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
 Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-26498 Filed 12-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 17886]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06062]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 34861; File No. 812-15329]

AGTB Fund Manager, LLC and AG Twin Brook Capital Income Fund

March 20, 2023.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'').

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') for an exemption from sections
18(a)(2), 18(c) and 18(i) and section 61(a) of the Act.

Summary of Application: Applicants request an order to permit certain
closed-end management investment companies that have elected to be
regulated as business development companies (``BDCs'') to issue
multiple classes of shares with varying sales loads and asset-based
service and/or distribution fees.

Applicants: AGTB Fund Manager, LLC and AG Twin Brook Capital Income
Fund.

Filing Dates: The application was filed on April 29, 2022 and amended
on June 2, 2022, June 22, 2022, September 29, 2022, and March 14, 2023.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing on any application by emailing
the Commission's Secretary at [email protected] and serving the
Applicants with a copy of the request by email, if an email address is
listed for the relevant Applicant below, or personally or by mail, if a
physical address is listed for the relevant Applicant below. Hearing
requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on April 14,
2023, and should be accompanied by proof of service on the Applicants,
in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the
desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason for the request,
and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing
may request notification by emailing the Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: The Commission: [email protected]. Applicants: Jenny
B. Neslin, [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Reid Ragen, Branch Chief, at
(202) 551-6825 (Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's
Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For Applicants' representations, legal
analysis, and conditions, please refer to Applicants' fourth amended
and restated application, dated March 14, 2023, which may be obtained
via the Commission's website by searching for the file number at the
top of this document, or for an Applicant using the Company name search
field, on the SEC's EDGAR system. The SEC's EDGAR system may be
searched at https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/legacy/companysearch.html. You may also call the SEC's Public Reference Room
at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-06062 Filed 3-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38792-38794]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13808]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-176, OMB Control No. 3235-0311]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension: Rule 7d-1

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the
collections of information summarized below. The Commission plans to
submit these existing collection of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension and approval.
    Section 7(d) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-
7(d)) (the ``Act'' or ``Investment Company Act'') requires an
investment company (``fund'') organized outside the United States
(``foreign fund'') to obtain an order from the Commission allowing the
fund to register under the Act before making a public offering of its
securities through the United States mail or any means of interstate
commerce. The Commission may issue an order only if it finds that it is
both legally and practically feasible effectively to enforce the
provisions of the Act against the foreign fund, and that the
registration of the fund is consistent with the public interest and
protection of investors.
    Rule 7d-1 (17 CFR 270.7d-1) under the Act, which was adopted in
1954, specifies the conditions under which a Canadian management
investment company (``Canadian fund'') may request an order from the
Commission permitting it to register under the Act. Although rule 7d-1
by its terms applies only to Canadian funds, other foreign funds
generally have agreed to comply with the requirements of rule 7d-1 as a
prerequisite to receiving an order permitting those foreign funds'
registration under the Act.
    The rule requires a Canadian fund that wishes to register to file
an application with the Commission that contains various undertakings
and agreements by the fund. The requirement of the Canadian fund to
file an application is a collection of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act. Certain of the undertakings and agreements, in turn,
impose the following additional information collection requirements:

    (1) the fund must file with the Commission agreements between
the fund and its directors, officers, and service providers
requiring them to comply with the fund's charter and bylaws, the
Act, and certain other obligations relating to the undertakings and
agreements in the application;
    (2) the fund and each of its directors, officers, and investment
advisers that is not a U.S. resident, must file with the Commission
an irrevocable designation of the fund's custodian in the United
States as agent for service of process;
    (3) the fund's charter and bylaws must provide that (a) the fund
will comply with certain provisions of the Act applicable to all
funds, (b) the fund will maintain originals or copies of its books
and records in the United States, and (c) the fund's contracts with
its custodian, investment adviser, and principal underwriter, will
contain certain terms, including a requirement that the adviser
maintain originals or copies of pertinent records in the United
States;
    (4) the fund's contracts with service providers will require
that the provider perform the contract in accordance with the Act,
the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a), and the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a), as applicable; and
    (5) the fund must file, and periodically revise, a list of
persons affiliated with the fund or its adviser or underwriter.

    As noted above, under section 7(d) of the Act the Commission may
issue an

order permitting a foreign fund's registration only if the Commission
finds that ``by reason of special circumstances or arrangements, it is
both legally and practically feasible effectively to enforce the
provisions of the (Act).'' The information collection requirements are
necessary to ensure that the substantive provisions of the Act may be
enforced as a matter of contract right in the United States or Canada
by the fund's shareholders or by the Commission.
    Rule 7d-1 also contains certain information collection requirements
that are associated with other provisions of the Act. These
requirements are applicable to all registered funds and are outside the
scope of this request.
    The Commission believes that one foreign fund is registered under
rule 7d-1 and currently active. Apart from requirements under the Act
applicable to all registered funds, rule 7d-1 imposes ongoing burdens
to maintain records in the United States, and to update, as necessary,
certain fund agreements, designations of the fund's custodian as
service agent, and the fund's list of affiliated persons. The
Commission staff estimates that each year under the rule, the active
registrant and its directors, officers, and service providers engage in
the following collections of information and associated burden hours:
    For the fund and its investment adviser to maintain records in the
United States: \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The rule requires an applicant and its investment adviser to
maintain records in the United States (which, without the
requirement, might be maintained in Canada or another foreign
jurisdiction), which facilitates routine inspections and any special
investigations of the fund by Commission staff. The registrant and
its investment adviser, however, already maintain the registrant's
records in the United States and in no other jurisdiction.
Therefore, maintenance of the registrant's records in the United
States does not impose an additional burden beyond that imposed by
other provisions of the Act. Those provisions are applicable to all
registered funds and the compliance burden of those provisions is
outside the scope of this request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    0 hours: 0 minutes of compliance clerk time.
     For the fund to update its list of affiliated persons:
    2 hours: 2 hours of support staff time.
     For new officers, directors, and service providers to
enter into and file agreements requiring them to comply with the fund's
charter and bylaws, the Act, and certain other obligations:
    0.5 hours: 7.5 minutes of director time; 2.5 minutes of officer
time; 20 minutes of support staff time.
     For new officers, directors, and investment advisers who
are not residents of the United States to file irrevocable designation
of the fund's custodian as agent for process of service:
    0.25 hours: 5 minutes of director time; 10 minutes of support staff
time.
    Based on the estimates above, the Commission estimates that the
total annual burden of the rule's paperwork requirements is 2.75
hours.\2\ If a fund were to file an application under rule 7d-1 to
register under the Act, the Commission estimates that the rule would
impose initial information collection burdens (for filing an
application, preparing the specified charter, bylaw, and contract
provisions, designations of agents for service of process, and an
initial list of affiliated persons, and establishing a means of keeping
records in the United States) of approximately 90 hours for the fund
and its associated persons. The Commission is not including these hours
in its calculation of the annual burden because no fund has applied to
register under the Act pursuant to rule 7d-1 in the last three years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: (0 + 2
+ 0.5 + 0.25) = 2.75 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, after registration, a Canadian fund may file a
supplemental application seeking special relief designed for the fund's
particular circumstances. Rule 7d-1 does not mandate these
applications. For purposes of this PRA we are assuming one registrant
has filed a substantive supplemental application within the past three
years. The Commission staff estimates that the rule would impose an
additional information collection burden of 5 hours on a fund to comply
with the Commission's application process. The staff understands that
funds also obtain assistance from outside counsel to comply with the
Commission's application process and the cost burden of using outside
counsel is discussed below.
    Therefore, the Commission staff estimates the aggregate annual
burden hours of the collection of information associated with rule 7d-1
is 13.25 hours.\3\ Amortized over three years we estimate an hourly
annual burden of 4.42 hours.\4\ These estimates of average burden hours
are made solely for the purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act. The
estimate is not derived from a comprehensive or even a representative
survey or study of Commission rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: 2.75
hours year 1 + 5 hours year 1 + 2.75 hours year 2 + 2.75 hours year
3 = 13.25 hours.
    \4\ The estimates are based on the following calculations: 4.42
hours = 13.25 cumulative burden hours/3 years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If a Canadian or other foreign fund in the future applied to
register under the Act under rule 7d-1, the fund initially might have
capital and start-up costs (not including hourly burdens) of an
estimated $20,000 to comply with the rule's initial information
collection requirements. These costs include legal and processing-
related fees for preparing the required documentation (such as the
application, charter, bylaw, and contract provisions, designations for
service of process, and the list of affiliated persons). Other related
costs would include fees for establishing arrangements with a custodian
or other agent for maintaining records in the United States, copying
and transportation costs for records, and the costs of purchasing or
leasing computer equipment, software, or other record storage equipment
for records maintained in electronic or photographic form.
    The Commission expects that a fund and its sponsors would incur
these costs immediately, and that the annualized cost of the
expenditures would be $20,000 in the first year. Some expenditures
might involve capital improvements, such as computer equipment, having
expected useful lives for which annualized figures beyond the first
year would be meaningful.
    These annualized figures are not provided, however, because, in
most cases, the expenses would be incurred immediately rather than on
an annual basis. The Commission is not including these costs in its
calculation of the annualized capital/start-up costs because no fund
has applied under rule 7d-1 to register under the Act pursuant to rule
7d-1 in the last three years.
    As indicated above, a Canadian or fund may file a supplemental
application seeking special relief designed for the fund's particular
circumstances. Rule 7d-1 does not mandate these applications. The
active registrant filed a substantive supplemental application in the
past three years. As noted above, the staff understands that funds
generally use outside counsel to prepare the application. The staff
estimates that outside counsel spends 10 hours preparing a supplemental
application, including 8 hours by an associate and 2 hours by a
partner. Outside counsel billing arrangements and rates vary based on
numerous factors, but the staff has estimated the average cost of
outside counsel as $531 per hour, based on information received from
funds, intermediaries and their counsel. The Commission staff therefore
estimates that the fund would obtain assistance

from outside counsel at a cost of $5,130.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: 10
hours x $531 per hour = $5,130.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The estimates of average burden hours and average cost burdens are
made solely for the purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and are
not derived from a comprehensive or even a representative survey or
study. Compliance with the collection of information requirements of
the rule is necessary to obtain the benefit of relying on the rule. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid control number.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimate of the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted by August 29, 2022.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: David Bottom, Acting
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an
email to: [email protected].

    Dated: June 23, 2022.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-13808 Filed 6-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 144 (Friday, July 30, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 41158]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16256]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides notice of intent to release 14.03
acres at the Melbourne International Airport, Melbourne, FL from the
conditions, reservations, and restrictions as contained in a Quitclaim
Deed agreement between the FAA and the City of Melbourne, dated August
6, 1947. The release of property will allow the City of Melbourne to
use the property for other than aeronautical purposes. The property is
located located on the Northeast Corner of Martin Luther King Jr.
Boulevard and NASA Boulevard at the Melbourne International Airport in
Brevard County. The parcel is currently designated as surplus property.
The property will be released of its federal obligations for the
purpose of building a consolidated City of Melbourne Police
Headquarters. The fair market value lease of this parcel has been
determined to be $3,367,000. Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request
are available, by appointment only, for inspection at the Melbourne
International Airport and the FAA Airports District Office.

DATES: Comments are due on or before August 30, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review at Melbourne
International Airport, and the FAA Airports District Office, 8427
SouthPark Circle, Suite 524, Orlando, FL 32819. Written comments on the
Sponsor's request must be delivered or mailed to: Marisol Elliott,
Community Planner, Orlando Airports District Office, 8427 SouthPark
Circle, Suite 524, Orlando, FL 32819.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisol Elliott,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
Community Planner, Orlando Airports District Office, 8427 SouthPark
Circle, Suite 524, Orlando, FL 32819.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) requires the
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment prior to
the ``waiver'' or ``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to
use certain airport land for non-aeronautical purposes.

Bartholomew Vernace,
Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2021-16256 Filed 7-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Docket Number FAA-2003-14293, otherwise known as “Ineligibility for an Airmen Certificate based on Security Grounds”, is ill conceived, poorly crafted legislation at best, and an egregious disintegration of civil liberties at worst.  The intention to safeguard the general populous from potential terrorist threats is a noble one.  However, going about protecting the public welfare by enacting knee-jerk regulation without due process, without evidence of an imminent, let alone potential threat, is bad governing and needs to be halted.  This regulation has been bulldozed into place in response (supposedly) to the terrorist acts of September 11, and will deny applicants seeking airmen certification, or suspend and possibly revoke the certificates of pilots deemed by the TSA to pose a security threat.  The flaws in this rule are many, not the least of which include:

1. The FAA did not follow it’s own established procedures for rule making.  There was no notice, no comment period, and no review.  This rule was presented as an “emergency” measure, albeit some 16 months after the event which supposedly inspired it.

2. Determination of who presents a risk, or even seemingly presents a risk, is left solely to the TSA.  No criteria have been provided for how the TSA will arrive at their judgment, and no review of their findings by a separate entity is required.  This flies in the face of some of our most basic principles, such as innocent until proven guilty, and judicial review.

3. There seem to be no protections against abuse of this policy.  If well-placed, faulty, and even anonymous accusations are made against a pilot, I’m sure the TSA will take them very seriously.  The innocent pilot will be left to provide a defense against engineered accusations.

4. There is no apparent recourse in the event an individual has been deemed a threat in error.  There is no redress of grievance.  Even our own framers of the Constitution had much to say against this method of governing.

5. Even with all of the butchered democracy set aside, no evidence has been presented suggesting that denying or revoking an airmen certificate will have any effect whatsoever on preventing aviation-related terrorist acts from occurring.  Did the FAA issue any certificates to any of the 9/11 hijackers?  It is not reasonable to assume that enacting this malformed regulation will have any effect on aviation security.  It is reasonable to assume, however, that denying or revoking a slip of paper from a determined terrorist will have no affect on their heinous mission.

Perhaps the most ludicrous part of this docket is it’s attempt to justify itself based upon possibilities: “pilots could drop chemical or biological agents from an aircraft or... crash aircraft into buildings... and flight instructors could teach terrorists how to operate aircraft.”  I’ll concede that any of these things could happen.  However, along that line of reasoning, truck drivers could load their trailers with explosives, chemical or biological agents and crash them into buildings or explode them in congested cities.  Has the TSA issued a rule to deny or revoke commercial driver’s licenses from persons known to pose, or suspected of posing, a security risk?  Taken further, is the TSA monitoring the public at large, and ordering state governments to deny or revoke driver’s licenses should an individual be deemed by the TSA to pose a security risk?  After all, anyone could rent a moving van, load it full of explosives, and set it off in front of a federal building.  Oh wait, that did happen.  That event was a tragedy to be sure, but did the government overreact by enacting broad, ill-conceived legislation to egress on the civil privileges of all drivers?  Has fertilizer been outlawed?  No.  Those things were simply a means to an end.  Taking away Timothy McVeigh’s driver’s license would not have stopped him.  Denying Mohamed Atta a pilot’s license would not have stopped him.  Extreme measures enacted on the basis of what could happen without due process, without reasonable justification, is not the way of a society whose culture was founded upon individual freedom and democratic process.

Let us protect our citizens as best we can, but do so by being diligent and mindful of our surroundings, not by needlessly terminating civil freedoms, and certainly not in this manner.  This legislation is dangerous, not so much in the actions it takes directly, but in the path it’s forging.  It opens the door for, dare I say it, Gestapo-like tactics where innocent pilots are accused of being a risk (or even a potential risk), and their rights are summarily revoked without due process.  What’s next?

Tim Keen

Commercial Pilot (at least for now)


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15184]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6060]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2012-0018]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Revision of a
Currently-Approved Information Collection Request: Designation of
Agents, Motor Carriers, Brokers and Freight Forwarders

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FMCSA
announces its plan to submit the Information Collection Request (ICR)
described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review
and approval. The FMCSA requests approval to revise an ICR entitled,
``Designation of Agents, Motor Carriers, Brokers and Freight Forwarders
(OMB Control Number 2126-0015),'' which is used to provide registered
motor carriers, property brokers, and freight forwarders a means of
meeting the Agency's process agent requirements.
    On November 29, 2011, FMCSA published a Federal Register notice
allowing for a 60-day comment period on the ICR. The Agency did not
receive any comments on the notice.

DATES: Please send your comments by April 13, 2012. OMB must receive
your comments by this date in order to act quickly on the ICR.

ADDRESSES: All comments should reference Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) Docket Number FMCSA-2012-0018. Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on the proposed information
collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the attention
of the Desk Officer, Department of Transportation/Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, and sent via electronic mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC
20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Tura Gatling, Customer Support
Team Leader, Commercial Enforcement Division, Department of
Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Telephone Number: (202)
385-2412; Email Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Office hours are from 8
a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Designation of Agents, Motor Carriers, Brokers and Freight
Forwarders.
    OMB Control Number: 2126-0015.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently-approved information
collection.
    Respondents: Motor carriers, freight forwarders and brokers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 35,000.
    Estimated Time per Response: 10 minutes.
    Expiration Date: May 31, 2012.
    Frequency of Response: Form BOC-3 must be filed by all for-hire
motor carriers, freight forwarders and brokers when the transportation
entity first registers with the FMCSA. All brokers shall make a
designation for each State in which it has an office or in which
contracts are written. Subsequent filings are made only if the motor
carrier, broker or freight forwarder changes their process agent
designations.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 5,833 hours [35,000 Form BOC-3
filings per year x 10 minutes/60 minutes to complete form = 5,833
hours].
    Background: The Secretary of Transportation (Secretary) is
authorized to register for-hire motor carriers of regulated commodities
under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 13902; freight forwarders under the
provisions of 49 U.S.C. 13903; and property brokers under provisions of
49 U.S.C. 13904. These persons may conduct transportation services only
if they are registered pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 13901. The Secretary has
delegated authority pertaining to these registration requirements to
the FMCSA pursuant to 49 CFR 1.73(a)(5).
    Registered motor carriers (including private carriers), brokers and
freight forwarders must designate an agent on whom service of notices
in proceedings before the Secretary may be made (49 U.S.C. 13303).
Registered motor carriers must also designate an agent for every State
in which they operate and traverse in the United States during such
operations, agents on whom process issued by a court may be served in
actions brought against the registered transportation entity (49 U.S.C.
13304, 49 CFR 366.4). Every broker shall make a designation for each
State in which its offices are located or in which contracts are
written (49 U.S.C. 13304, 49 CFR 366.4). Regulations governing the
designation of process agents are found at 49 CFR part 366. While part
366 is silent regarding its applicability to freight forwarders, as
noted above, they are also required by statute to designate process
agents (see 49 U.S.C. 13303). These designations are filed with the
FMCSA on Form BOC-3, ``Designation of Agents for Service of Process.''
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including: (1) Whether the proposed
collection is necessary for the FMCSA to perform its functions; (2) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways for FMCSA to enhance the
quality, usefulness, and clarity of the collected information; and (4)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information.

    Issued on: March 5, 2012.
Kelly Leone,
Associate Administrator for Research and Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2012-6060 Filed 3-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 8, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37011-37012]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16644]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2017-0524]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Mill River, New Haven, CT

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation; modification.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has modified a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the Chapel Street Bridge across the
Mill River, mile 0.4 at New Haven, Connecticut. This modified deviation
is necessary to accommodate delays to the bridge deck replacement and
various repairs. This modified deviation allows the bridge to open for
the passage of vessels upon two hours of advance notice as well as a
twelve day closure of the draw to all vessel traffic.

DATES: This modified deviation is effective without actual notice from
August 8, 2017 through 11:59 p.m. on September 9, 2017. For purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used from 12:01 a.m. on August 1,
2017 until August 8, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this deviation, USCG-2017-0524, is available
at http://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number in the ``SEARCH''
box and click ``SEARCH''. Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary deviation, call or email James M. Moore, Bridge Management
Specialist, First District Bridge Branch, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
212-514-4334, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The City of New Haven, the owner of the
bridge, requested a temporary deviation from the normal operating
schedule to facilitate rehabilitation of the bridge, specifically
replacement of the bridge deck. The Chapel Street Bridge, across the
Mill River, mile 0.4 at New Haven, Connecticut offers mariners a
vertical clearance of 7.9 feet at mean high water and 14 feet at mean
low water in the closed position. The existing drawbridge operating
regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.213(d).
    On July 6, 2017, the Coast Guard published a temporary deviation
entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Mill River, New Haven, CT''
in the Federal Register (82 FR 31253). Under that temporary deviation,
the Chapel Street Bridge would open for mariners provided a two hour
advance notice was furnished to the owner of the bridge (with the
bridge authorized to remain closed during weekday rush hour timeframes
with the exception of recognized federal holidays) and the draw would
remain closed to all vessels requiring an opening from 12:01 a.m. July
27, 2017 until 11:59 p.m. August 7, 2017 to facilitate the pouring/
curing of new bridge deck material. The draw would then revert to
opening for mariners given two hours of advance notice until September
9, 2017.
    Due to project delays precipitated by the discovery of advanced
corrosion of the steel deck grid prior to the planned pouring of
concrete deck material as well as associated remediation of the same
corrosion, the City of New Haven has requested that until 11:59 p.m.
August 9, 2017 the draw of the Chapel Street Bridge open for the
passage of vessels requiring an opening provided two hours of advance
notice is furnished to the owner of the bridge; except that, from 7:30
a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays, the draw need not open for the passage of
vessel traffic. The bridge will remain closed to all vessels requiring
an opening from 12:01 a.m. August 10, 2017 until 11:59 p.m. August 21,
2017 to facilitate the pouring/curing of new bridge deck material. From
12:01 a.m. August 22, 2017 until 11:59 p.m. September 9, 2017 the
bridge will open for the passage of vessels requiring an opening
provided two hours of advance notice is furnished to the owner of the
bridge; except that from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, the draw need not
open for the passage of vessel traffic.
    The bridge routinely opens for commercial vessels. Nevertheless,
the requirement for two hours of advance notice has not impeded routine
waterway operations. Mariners have offered no objection to a twelve day
closure of the draw in order to complete the necessary deck
replacement. The concrete pour and curing process can be accomplished
in four days, but a twelve day closure period has been requested in
order to take inclement weather into account. The bridge will resume
operations as soon as the curing process has been completed. The City
of New Haven has maintained open lines of communication with waterway
operators and ensured all project developments are quickly disseminated
to all relevant parties.
    Vessels that can pass under the bridge without an opening may do so
at all times. The bridge will be not able to open for emergencies.
There is no alternate route for vessels to pass.
    The Coast Guard will also inform the users of the waterways through
our Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the change in operating
schedule for the bridge so that vessel operators can arrange their
transits to minimize any impact caused by the temporary deviation.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the effective
period of this temporary deviation. This deviation

from the operating regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: August 2, 2017.
Christopher J. Bisignano,
Supervisory Bridge Management Specialist, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017-16644 Filed 8-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


particular, with the requirements of Sections 17A(b)(3)(F),
17A(b)(3)(G), and 17A(b)(3)(H) of the Act, and Rules 17Ad-22(e)(1),
(e)(2)(i), 17Ad-22(e)(6)(ii), 17Ad-22(e)(10), 17Ad-22(e)(13), 17Ad-
22(e)(14), 17Ad-22(e)(17)(i), and (e)(18).\69\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \69\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F); 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(G); 15
U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(H); 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(1), (e)(2)(i),
(e)(6)(ii), (e)(10), (e)(13), (e)(14), (e)(17)(i), and (e)(18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act
\70\ that the proposed rule change, as modified by Partial Amendment
No. 1 (SR-ICEEU-2021-010), be, and hereby is, approved.\71\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \70\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \71\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \72\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\72\
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-18941 Filed 9-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 16, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15657-15658]
[FR Doc No: 2019-07507]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-85586; File No. SR-CboeBYX-2018-014]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Make Permanent Exchange Rule
11.24, Which Sets Forth the Exchange's Pilot Retail Price Improvement
Program

April 10, 2019.
    On July 30, 2018, Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (``BYX'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to make permanent Exchange Rule 11.24, which sets
forth the Exchange's pilot Retail Price Improvement Program. The

proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on August 17, 2018.\3\ On September 27, 2018, the Commission extended
to November 15, 2018, the time period in which to approve, disapprove,
or institute proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove,
the proposed rule change.\4\ On November 15, 2018, the Commission
instituted proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \5\ to
determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\6\
On December 26, 2018, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\7\ the
Commission extended to April 14, 2019 the time period in which to issue
an order approving or disapproving the proposed rule change.\8\ The
Commission received no comments on the proposed rule change. On April
3, 2019, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-CboeBYX-
2018-014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83831 (August 13,
2018), 83 FR 41128 (``Notice'').
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84297, 83 FR 49959
(October 3, 2018).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78(s)(b)(2)(B).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84600, 83 FR 58802
(November 21, 2018).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84972, 84 FR 867
(January 31, 2019).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-07507 Filed 4-15-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 42808]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19247]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-2428-000]

Just Energy Pennsylvania Corp.; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding,
of Just Energy Pennsylvania Corp.'s application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is September 26, 2017.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 6, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19247 Filed 9-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2302-2303]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00592]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2014-1066]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atchafalaya River, Morgan City,
LA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from drawbridge regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the
regulation governing the operation of the Morgan City(Berwick Bay)
Railroad Bridge across the Atchafalaya River, mile 17.5 (Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway (Morgan City-Port Allen Alternate Route) mile
0.3) in Morgan City, St. Mary's Parish, Louisiana. This deviation
provides for the bridge to remain closed to navigation for four
consecutive hours in the morning and three hours in the afternoon with
an opening in the middle to pass vessels. This will last for six
consecutive days. The purpose of the closure is to conduct scheduled
maintenance and repairs to the drawbridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 7 a.m. to 11 a.m. and then
again from 1 p.m. through 4 p.m. daily from January 26 through January
31, 2015.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this deviation, [USCG-2014-1066] is available
at http://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number in the ``SEARCH''
box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary

deviation, call or email Jim Wetherington, Bridge Administration
Branch, Coast Guard, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Cheryl F. Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BNSF Railway Company requested a
temporary deviation from the normal operation of the drawbridge in
order to perform the installation of new generators and the removal of
the old festoon cable. These repairs and scheduled maintenance are
necessary for the continued operation of the bridge. This deviation
allows the draw of the Morgan City (Berwick Bay) Railroad Bridge across
the Atchafalaya River, mile 17.5 (Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (Morgan
City-Port Allen Alternate Route) mile 0.3), to remain closed to
navigation for four consecutive hours in the morning and three hours in
the afternoon with an opening in the middle to pass vessels. The
deviation is effective from 7 a.m. to 11 a.m. and then again from 1
p.m. through 4 p.m. daily from January 26 through January 31, 2015.
    Broadcast Notice to Mariners will be used to update mariners of any
changes in this deviation.
    The bridge has a vertical clearance of 4 feet above high water in
the closed-to-navigation position and 73 feet above high water in the
open-to-navigation position. Navigation on the waterway consists of
tugs with tows, oil industry related work boats and crew boats,
commercial fishing vessels and some recreational craft. In accordance
with 33 CFR 117.5, the draw of the bridge shall open on signal. The
Morgan City-Port Allen Landside route through Amelia, LA is the
alternate route.
    BNSF and the Coast Guard have coordinated the closure with waterway
users, industry, and other Coast Guard units. This date and this
schedule were chosen to minimize the significant effects on vessel
traffic.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the effective
period of this temporary deviation. This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: January 9, 2015.
David M. Frank,
Bridge Administrator, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015-00592 Filed 1-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P