[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8936-8937]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04251]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2018-0091]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Petaluma River, Haystack Landing
(Petaluma), CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations; request for
comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the Northwestern Pacific (SMART)
railroad bridge across the Petaluma River, mile 12.4, at Haystack
Landing (Petaluma), CA. This deviation will test a change to the
drawbridge operation schedule to determine whether a permanent change
to the schedule is appropriate. This test deviation will modify the
existing regulation to add an advance notification requirement for
obtaining bridge openings.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 6 a.m. on March 19, 2018 to 6
a.m. on June 17, 2018.
    Comments and related materials must reach the Coast Guard on or
before July 2, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0091 using Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this test
deviation, call or email Carl T. Hausner, Chief, Bridge Section,
Eleventh Coast Guard District; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis

    Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) owns the Northwestern
Pacific railroad bridge across the Petaluma River, mile 12.4, at
Haystack Landing (Petaluma), CA. The bridge has a vertical clearance of
3.6 feet above mean high water in the closed-to-navigation position and
unlimited vertical clearance in the open-to-navigation position, and
currently operates under 33 CFR 117.187(a).
    In 2015, SMART replaced the original swing bridge with a single
leaf bascule bridge. Prior to 2015, the swing bridge was rarely used
and was maintained in the fully open position. Commuter rail service
began on August 25, 2017. Currently 32 trains cross the bridge each
day. The Petaluma River supports commercial and recreational traffic.
Due to an increase in said rail traffic, SMART has requested the
drawspan remain in the closed-to-navigation position to avoid
unnecessary bridge openings. The Coast Guard is publishing this
temporary deviation to test the proposed schedule change SMART has

requested to determine whether a permanent change to the schedule is
appropriate to better balance the needs of marine and rail traffic.
    Under this temporary deviation, in effect from 6 a.m. on March 19,
2018 to 6 a.m. on June 17, 2018, the bridge shall open on signal from 3
a.m. to 11 p.m. if at least 2 hours notice is given to the drawtender.
At all other times, the draw shall be maintained in the fully open
position, except for the passage of trains or for maintenance. To
request an opening, mariners can contact the drawtender via marine
radio VHF-FM channel 16/9 or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>. Vessels
able to pass through the bridge in the closed position may do so at
anytime. The bridge will be required to open as soon as practicable for
vessels engaged in emergency response. SMART will log dates and times
of vessels requesting openings. There are no alternate routes for
vessels transiting upstream of the bridge on the Petaluma River.
    The Coast Guard will also inform the users of the waterways through
our Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners and through direct outreach
to local harbors, marinas, and water-based business of the temporary
change in the operating schedule for the bridge so that vessel
operators can arrange their transits to minimize any impact caused by
the temporary deviation.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the effective
period of this temporary deviation. This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

II. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and materials received during the
comment period. Your comments can help shape the outcome of this
rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the docket number
for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to
which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
    Documents mentioned in this document as being available in this
docket and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

    Dated: February 26, 2018.
Carl T. Hausner,
District Bridge Chief, Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2018-04251 Filed 3-1-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: July 22, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 139)]
[Notices]
[Page 36184-36185]
[DOCID:fr22jy09-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

July 13, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP09-586-001.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC submits Fourth Revised
Sheet 503 of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume 1, to be
effective 7/13/09.
    Filed Date: 06/12/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090615-0030.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 17, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-658-001.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC submits Second Revised
Sheet No 385 et al to its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No 1.
    Filed Date: 07/08/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090709-0333.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 20, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-713-001.
    Applicants: Columbia Gulf Transmission Company.
    Description: Columbia Gas Transmission Company submits Twelfth
Revised Sheet No 286 et al to its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised
Volume No 1.
    Filed Date: 07/08/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090709-0334.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 20, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-714-001.
    Applicants: Crossroads Pipeline Company.
    Description: Crossroads Pipeline Company submits Sixth Revised
Sheet No 380 et al to its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No 1.
    Filed Date: 07/08/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090709-0335.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 20, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-715-001.
    Applicants: Hardy Storage Company, LLC.
    Description: Hardy Storage Company, LLC submits Second Revised
Sheet No 186 et al to its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Revised Volume No
1.
    Filed Date: 07/08/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090709-0336.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 20, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-716-001.
    Applicants: Central Kentucky Transmission Company.
    Description: Central Kentucky Transmission Company submits Second
Revised Sheet No 254 et al to its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Revised
Volume No 1.
    Filed Date: 07/08/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090709-0337.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 20, 2009.

    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Such protests must be filed on or before 5 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date. Anyone filing a protest must serve
a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-17368 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


10370 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2003 / Rules and Regulations Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ACE KS E5 Moundridge, KS Moundridge Municipal Airport, KS ( Lat. 38 ° 12  25  N., Long. 97 ° 30  11  W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface of the earth within a 6.5 mile radius of Moundridge Municipal Airport.

* * * * *

Issued in Kansas City, MO on February 19, 2003. Herman J. Lyons, Jr., Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region. [ FR Doc. 03   5130 Filed 3   4   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910   13   M ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 82 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone CFR Correction In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 81 to 85, revised as of July 1, 2002, on page 342, in § 82.4, remove Table I at the end of paragraph ( t)( 4).

[ FR Doc. 03   55508 Filed 3   4   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505   01   D ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [ OPP   2003   0036; FRL   7292   8]

Hexythiazox; Pesticide Tolerance AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a tolerance for combined residues of hexythiazox in or on date, dried fruit. The Interregional Research Project Number 4 ( IR 4) requested this tolerance under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ( FFDCA), as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 ( FQPA). DATES: This regulation is effective March 5, 2003. Objections and requests for hearings, identified by docket ID number OPP   2003   0036, must be received on or before May 5, 2003. ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests may be submitted electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/ courier. Follow the detailed instructions as provided in Unit VI. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hoyt Jamerson, Registration Division ( 7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001; telephone number: ( 703) 308   9368; e mail address: jamerson. hoyt@ epa. gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are potentially affected by this action if you an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:   Crop production ( NAICS 111)   Animal production ( NAICS 112)   Food manufacturing ( NAICS 311)   Pesticide manufacturing ( NAICS 32532) This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be affected. The North American Industrial Classification System ( NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?

1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this action under docket identification ( ID) number OPP   2003   0036. The official public docket consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other information related to this action. Although a part of the official docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business Information ( CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public docket is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch ( PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall # 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket telephone number is ( 703) 305   5805. 2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the `` Federal Register'' listings at http:// www. epa. gov/ fedrgstr/. A frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 is available at http:// www. access. gpo. gov/ nara/ cfr/ cfrhtml_ 00/ Title_ 40/ 40cfr180_ 00. html, a beta site currently under development. To access the OPPTS Harmonized Guidelines referenced in this document, go directly to the guidelines at http:// www. epa. gov/ opptsfrs/ home/ guidelin. htm. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket/ to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I. B. 1. Once in the system, select `` search,'' then key in the appropriate docket ID number.

II. Background and Statutory Findings In the Federal Register of March 14, 2002 ( 67 FR 11480) ( FRL   6826   3), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408 of FFDCA, 21 U. S. C. 346a, as amended by FQPA ( Public Law 104   170), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition ( 1E6325) by the Interregional Research Project Number 4 ( IR 4), 681 U. S. Highway # 1 South, North Brunswick, NJ 08902   3390. That notice included a summary of the petition prepared by Gowan Company, the registrant. There were no comments received in response to the notice of filing. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.448 be amended by establishing a tolerance for combined residues of the miticide, hexythiazox, trans 5( 4 chlorophenyl) N cyclohexyl 4 methyl 2 oxothiazolidine 3 carboxamide and its metabolites containing the 4 chlorophenyl 4 methyl 2 oxo 3 thiazolidine moiety in or on date, dried fruit at 1.0 parts per million ( ppm). Section 408( b)( 2)( A)( i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish a tolerance ( the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is `` safe.'' Section 408( b)( 2)( A)( ii) of the FFDCA defines `` safe'' to mean that `` there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 18: 49 Mar 04, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 05MRR1. SGM 05MRR1 10371 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2003 / Rules and Regulations all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure. Section 408( b)( 2)( C) of the FFDCA requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to `` ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue....'' EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. For further discussion of the regulatory requirements of section 408 of the FFDCA and a complete description of the risk assessment process, see the final rule on Bifenthrin Pesticide Tolerances November 26, 1997 ( 62 FR 62961) ( FRL   5754   7).

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety Consistent with section 408( b)( 2)( D) of the FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on aggregate exposure, consistent with section 408( b)( 2) of the FFDCA, for a tolerance for combined residues of hexythiazox on date, dried fruit at 1.0 ppm. EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with establishing the tolerance follows.

A. Toxicological Profile and Endpoints EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and children. The nature of the toxic effects caused by hexythiazox and the endpoints use in risk assessment are discussed in Unit III. A. and B. of the final rule on hexythiazox pesticide tolerances published in the Federal Register of April 18, 2001 ( 66 FR 19879) ( FRL   6778   8). Please refer to this document should you desire detailed toxicological information on hexythiazox. The Agency has identified an acute dietary endpoint for females 13 years and older. The acute population adjusted dose ( aPAD) for females is 2.4 milligrams/ kilograms/ day ( mg/ kg/ day). No acute dietary endpoint was identified for the general population including infants and children; a dose and endpoint attributable to a single exposure were not identified from the available oral toxicity studies, including maternal toxicity in the developmental toxicity studies. The chronic population adjusted dose ( cPAD) for all populations is 0.025 mg/ kg/ day. Hexythiazox has been classified as a category C, possible human carcinogen, for cancer. The calculated Q* for hexythiazox is 2.22 x 10 2.

B. Exposure Assessment 1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. Tolerances have been established ( 40 CFR 180.448) for the combined residues of hexythiazox, trans 5( 4 chlorophenyl) N cyclohexyl 4 methyl 2 oxothiazolidine 3 carboxamide and its metabolites containing the 4 chlorophenyl 4 methyl 2 oxo 3 thiazolidine moiety in or on a variety of raw agricultural commodities ( RAC) including tolerances for milk, fat, and meat byproducts of cattle, goat, horse, sheep, and swine. Risk assessments were conducted by EPA to assess dietary exposures from hexythiazox in food as follows: i. Acute exposure. Acute dietary risk assessments are performed for a fooduse pesticide if a toxicological study has indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring as a result of a 1   day or single exposure. The dietary exposure evaluation model ( DEEMTM) analysis evaluated the individual food consumption as reported by respondents in the Department of Agriculture ( USDA) 1989   1992 nationwide Continuing Surveys of Food Intake by Individuals ( CSFII) and accumulated exposure to the chemical for each commodity. The following assumptions were made for the acute exposure assessments: Default processing factors were used, and 100 percent crop treated ( PCT) information for all commodities. ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting this chronic dietary risk assessment the DEEMTM analysis evaluated the individual food consumption as reported by respondents in the USDA 1989   1992 nationwide CSFII and accumulated exposure to the chemical for each commodity. The following assumptions were made for the chronic exposure assessments: A partiallyrefined dietary analysis was performed using anticipated residue levels for most crops ( calculated from field trial data) and PCT or anticipated market share information for all crops. iii. Cancer. A partially refined dietary exposure analysis was performed using anticipated residue ( AR) levels for most crops, processing factors where applicable, and PCT or anticipated market share information for all crops. iv. Anticipated residue and PCT information. Section 408( b)( 2)( E) of the FFDCA authorizes EPA to use available data and information on the anticipated residue levels of pesticide residues in food and the actual levels of pesticide chemicals that have been measured in food. If EPA relies on such information, EPA must require that data be provided 5 years after the tolerance is established, modified, or left in effect, demonstrating that the levels in food are not above the levels anticipated. Following the initial data submission, EPA is authorized to require similar data on a time frame it deems appropriate. As required by section 408( b)( 2)( E) of the FFDCA, EPA will issue a data call in for information relating to anticipated residues to be submitted no later than 5 years from the date of issuance of this tolerance. Section 408( b)( 2)( F) of the FFDCA states that the Agency may use data on the actual percent of food treated for assessing chronic dietary risk only if the Agency can make the following findings: Condition 1, that the data used are reliable and provide a valid basis to show what percentage of the food derived from such crop is likely to contain such pesticide residue; Condition 2, that the exposure estimate does not underestimate exposure for any significant subpopulation group, and Condition 3, if data are available on pesticide use and food consumption in a particular area, the exposure estimate does not understate exposure for the population in such area. In addition, the Agency must provide for periodic evaluation of any estimates used. To provide for the periodic evaluation of the estimate of PCT as required by section 408( b)( 2)( F) of the FFDCA, EPA may require registrants to submit data on PCT. The following Table 1 provides a summary of the anticipated residue ( AR) and PCT information used for the chronic and cancer exposure assessments. The Agency has issued emergency exemptions to the state of California for use of hexythiazox on dates since 1998. The PCT information for dates is based on applications made under these emergency exemptions. The majority of dates grown in the United States are grown in California.

VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 18: 49 Mar 04, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 05MRR1. SGM 05MRR1 10372 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2003 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 1.   SUMMARY OF HEXYTHIAZOX ANTICIPATED RESIDUES ( AR) FOR CHRONIC AND CANCER DIETARY EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT BASED ON FIELD TRIAL DATA Commodity Established or HED Recommended Tolerances ( ppm) AR ( ppm) CT/ Anticipated Market Share (%)

Almond hulls 10 2.7 2 Almond nutmeat 0.30 0.046 2 Apples 0.50 0.12 4 Apple juice 0.50 0.12 4 Apricots 1.0 0.20 2 Caneberry crop subgroup 1.0 0.34 15 Cherries 1.0 0.20 < 1 Cottonseed meal 0.20 0.059 1 Dates 1.0 0.24 45 Fat 0.02 0.0000076 Hog Fat 0.02 6.3 x 10 10 Hog Liver 0.02 4.8 x 10 9 Hog Meat by products ( except liver) 0.02 2.0 x 10 9 Hops 2.0 2.0 45 Liver 0.02 0.000058 Meat by products ( except liver) 0.02 0.000024 Milk 0.02 0.0000053 Nectarines 1.0 0.054 2 Other nutmeat 0.30 0.046 < 1 Peaches 1.0 0.14 1 Pears 0.30 0.30 3 Pecans 0.30 0.01 < 1 Peppermint, tops 2.0 0.77 5 Plum 0.10 0.050 1 Plum, prune, dried 0.40 0.050 < 1 Plum, prune, fresh 0.10 0.050 < 1 Refined cottonseed oil 0.20 0.059 1 Spearmint, tops 2.0 0.77 5 Strawberries 3.0 0.75 14 Undelinted cottonseed 0.20 0.059 1 Wet apple pomace 0.80 0.12 4 The Agency believes that the three conditions listed above have been met. With respect to Condition 1, PCT estimates are derived from Federal and private market survey data, which are reliable and have a valid basis. EPA uses a weighted average PCT for chronic dietary exposure estimates. This weighted average PCT figure is derived by averaging State level data for a period of up to 10 years, and weighting for the more robust and recent data. A weighted average of the PCT reasonably represents a person's dietary exposure over a lifetime, and is unlikely to underestimate exposure to an individual because of the fact that pesticide use patterns ( both regionally and nationally)

VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 18: 49 Mar 04, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 05MRR1. SGM 05MRR1 10373 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2003 / Rules and Regulations tend to change continuously over time, such that an individual is unlikely to be exposed to more than the average PCT over a lifetime. The Agency is reasonably certain that the percentage of the food treated is not likely to be an underestimation. As to Conditions 2 and 3, regional consumption information and consumption information for significant subpopulations is taken into account through EPA's computer based model for evaluating the exposure of significant subpopulations including several regional groups. Use of this consumption information in EPA's risk assessment process ensures that EPA's exposure estimate does not understate exposure for any significant subpopulation group and allows the Agency to be reasonably certain that no regional population is exposed to residue levels higher than those estimated by the Agency. Other than the data available through national food consumption surveys, EPA does not have available information on the regional consumption of food to which hexythiazox may be applied in a particular area. 2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency lacks sufficient monitoring exposure data to complete a comprehensive dietary exposure analysis and risk assessment for hexythiazox in drinking water. Because the Agency does not have comprehensive monitoring data, drinking water concentration estimates are made by reliance on simulation or modeling taking into account data on the physical characteristics of hexythiazox. The Agency uses the generic estimated environmental concentration ( GENEEC) or the pesticide root zone/ exposure analysis modeling system ( PRZM/ EXAMS) to estimate pesticide concentrations in surface water and SCIGROW which predicts pesticide concentrations in groundwater. In general, EPA will use GENEEC ( a tier 1 model) before using PRZM/ EXAMS ( a tier 2 model) for a screening level assessment for surface water. The GENEEC model is a subset of the PRZM/ EXAMS model that uses a specific highend runoff scenario for pesticides. GENEEC incorporates a farm pond scenario, while PRZM/ EXAMS incorporate an index reservoir environment in place of the previous pond scenario. The PRZM/ EXAMS model includes a percent crop area factor as an adjustment to account for the maximum percent crop coverage within a watershed or drainage basin. None of these models include consideration of the impact processing ( mixing, dilution, or treatment) of raw water for distribution as drinking water would likely have on the removal of pesticides from the source water. The primary use of these models by the Agency at this stage is to provide a coarse screen for sorting out pesticides for which it is highly unlikely that drinking water concentrations would ever exceed human health levels of concern. Since the models used are considered to be screening tools in the risk assessment process, the Agency does not use estimated environmental concentrations ( EECs) from these models to quantify drinking water exposure and risk as a percent reference dose (% RfD) or percent population adjusted dose (% PAD). Instead, drinking water levels of comparison ( DWLOCs) are calculated and used as a point of comparison against the model estimates of a pesticide's concentration in water. DWLOCs are theoretical upper limits on a pesticide's concentration in drinking water in light of total aggregate exposure to a pesticide in food, and from residential uses. Since DWLOCs address total aggregate exposure to hexythiazox they are further discussed in the aggregate risk sections below. Based on the GENEEC and SCI GROW models the EECs of hexythiazox for acute exposures are estimated to be 1.81 parts per billion ( ppb) for surface water and 0.009 ppb for ground water. The EECs for chronic exposures are estimated to be 0.91 ppb for surface water and 0.009 ppb for ground water. 3. From non dietary exposure. The term `` residential exposure'' is used in this document to refer to nonoccupational non dietary exposure ( e. g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control, termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets). Hexythiazox is not registered for use on any sites that would result in residential exposure. 4. Cumulative exposure to substances with a common mechanism of toxicity. Section 408( b)( 2)( D)( v) of the FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider `` available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues and `` other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.'' EPA does not have, at this time, available data to determine whether hexythiazox has a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances or how to include this pesticide in a cumulative risk assessment. Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, hexythiazox does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has not assumed that hexythiazox has a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see the final rule for Bifenthrin Pesticide Tolerances ( 62 FR 62961, November 26, 1997).

D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children Section 408 of the FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an additional tenfold margin of safety for infants and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the data base on toxicity and exposure unless EPA determines that a different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. Margins of safety are incorporated into EPA risk assessments either directly through use of a margin of exposure ( MOE) analysis or through using uncertainty ( safety) factors ( UF) in calculating a dose level that poses no appreciable risk to humans. The prenatal and postnatal toxicology data base for hexythiazox is complete with respect to FQPA considerations. The nature of the toxic effects caused by hexythiazox are discussed in Unit III. D. of the final rule on hexythiazox pesticide tolerances published in the Federal Register of April 18, 2001 ( 66 FR 19879) ( FRL   6778   8). Please refer to this document should you desire detailed toxicological information on hexythiazox regarding FQPA considerations. The results of the prenatal and postnatal toxicology studies indicated no increased susceptibility of rats or rabbits to in utero and/ or postnatal exposure to hexythiazox. There is a complete toxicity data base for hexythiazox and exposure data are complete or are estimated based on data that reasonably accounts for potential exposures. EPA determined that the 10X safety factor to protect infants and children should be removed and reduced to 1X. The FQPA factor is removed because an additional safety factor is not needed to protect the safety of infants and children.

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety To estimate total aggregate exposure to a pesticide from food, drinking water, and residential uses, the Agency calculates DWLOCs which are used as a VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 18: 49 Mar 04, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 05MRR1. SGM 05MRR1 10374 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2003 / Rules and Regulations point of comparison against the model estimates of a pesticide's concentration in water ( EECs). DWLOC values are not regulatory standards for drinking water. DWLOCs are theoretical upper limits on a pesticide's concentration in drinking water in light of total aggregate exposure to a pesticide in food and residential uses. In calculating a DWLOC, the Agency determines how much of the acceptable exposure ( i. e., the PAD) is available for exposure through drinking water e. g., allowable chronic water exposure ( mg/ kg/ day) = chronic ( cPAD)

¥ ( average food + residential exposure). This allowable exposure through drinking water is used to calculate a DWLOC. A DWLOC will vary depending on the toxic endpoint, drinking water consumption, and body weights. Default body weights and consumption values as used by the U. S. EPA Office of Water are used to calculate DWLOCs: 2 liter ( L)/ 70 kg ( adult male), 2L/ 60 kg ( adult female), and 1L/ 10 kg ( child). Default body weights and drinking water consumption values vary on an individual basis. This variation will be taken into account in more refined screening level and quantitative drinking water exposure assessments. Different populations will have different DWLOCs. Generally, a DWLOC is calculated for each type of risk assessment used: Acute, short term, intermediate term, chronic, and cancer. When EECs for surface water and ground water are less than the calculated DWLOCs, EPA concludes with reasonable certainty that exposures to the pesticide in drinking water ( when considered along with other sources of exposure for which EPA has reliable data) would not result in unacceptable levels of aggregate human health risk at this time. Because EPA considers the aggregate risk resulting from multiple exposure pathways associated with a pesticide's uses, levels of comparison in drinking water may vary as those uses change. If new uses are added in the future, EPA will reassess the potential impacts of residues of the pesticide in drinking water as a part of the aggregate risk assessment process. 1. Acute risk. An acute dietary endpoint has only been identified for females ( 13 years and older). Using the exposure assumptions discussed in this unit for acute exposure, the acute dietary exposure from food to hexythiazox will occupy less than 1% of the aPAD for females 13 years and older. In addition, there is potential for acute dietary exposure to hexythiazox in drinking water. After calculating DWLOCs and comparing them to the EECs for surface and ground water, EPA does not expect the aggregate exposure to exceed 100% of the aPAD, as shown in the following Table 2:

TABLE 2.   AGGREGATE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ACUTE EXPOSURE TO HEXYTHIAZOX Population Subgroup aPAD ( mg/ kg) % aPAD ( Food) Surface Water EEC ( ppb) Ground Water EEC ( ppb) Acute DWLOC ( ppb)

Females 13 years and older 2.4 < 1% 1.81 0.009 72,000 2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that exposure to hexythiazox from food will utilize less than 1% of the cPAD for the U. S. population and all infants and children subpopulations. There are no residential uses for hexythiazox. There is potential for chronic dietary exposure to hexythiazox in drinking water. After calculating DWLOCs and comparing them to the EECs for surface water and ground water, EPA does not expect the aggregate exposure to exceed 100% of the cPAD, as shown in the following Table 3:

TABLE 3.   AGGREGATE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CHRONIC ( NON CANCER) EXPOSURE TO HEXYTHIAZOX Population Subgroup cPAD mg/ kg/ day % cPAD ( Food) Surface Water EEC ( ppb) Ground Water EEC ( ppb) Chronic DWLOC ( ppb)

U. S. population 0.025 < 1% 0.91 0.009 870 Children 0.025 < 1% 0.91 0.009 250 Infants 0.025 < 1% 0.91 0.009 250 3. Short term and intermediate term risk. Short term and intermediate term aggregate exposures take into account residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food and water ( considered to be a background exposure level). Hexythiazox is not registered for use on any sites that would result in residential exposure. Therefore, the aggregate risk is the sum of the risk from food and water, which do not exceed the Agency's level of concern. 4. Aggregate cancer risk for U. S. population. Hexythiazox has been classified as a Category C possible human carcinogen ( Q1 * = 2.22 x 10 2). Using the exposure assumptions discussed in this unit for cancer, the carcinogenic risk estimate from food for the general U. S. population is 2.5 x 10 7. There is potential for chronic dietary exposure to hexythiazox in drinking water. After calculating DWLOCs and comparing them to the EECs for surface water and ground water, EPA does not expect the estimated cancer risk for aggregate exposure to exceed 1 x 10 6 as shown in the following Table 4:

VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 18: 49 Mar 04, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 05MRR1. SGM 05MRR1 10375 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2003 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 4.   AGGREGATE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CHRONIC ( NON CANCER) EXPOSURE TO HEXYTHIAZOX Population Subgroup Q1 * Estimated Carcinogenic Risk ( Food) Surface Water EEC ( ppb) Ground Water EEC ( ppb) Cancer DWLOC ( ppb)

U. S. population 2.22 x 10 2 2.5 x 10 7 0.91 0.009 1.2 5. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general population, and to infants and children from aggregate exposure to hexythiazox residues.

IV. Other Considerations A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology The high performance liquid chromatography/ ultraviolet ( HPLC/ UV) analytical method used for determining the combined residues of hexythiazox and its metabolites in dates is adequate for data collection purposes. Adequate method validation data were submitted. This method is based on Method AMR 985   87, which has been deemed acceptable as a tolerance enforcement method in conjunction with a petition for use on apples. The method has been validated for use on various crop commodities, and has been forwarded to the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA) for inclusion in Pesticide Analytical Method Volume II ( PAM II). This earlier method is considered sufficient to enforce the proposed permanent tolerances for residues in or on dates.

B. International Residue Limits There are no Mexican, Canadian or Codex maximum residue limits ( MRLs) established for hexythiazox in or on dates.

C. Magnitude of Residues An adequate number of residue field trials reflecting the proposed use directions were submitted to EPA to demonstrate that the tolerance for date, dried fruits at 1.0 ppm will not be exceeded when hexythiazox products labeled for this use are used as directed.

D. Rotational Crop Restrictions As dates are a perennial crop, confined and field rotational crop studies are not required to support the subject petitions.

V. Conclusion Therefore, the tolerance is established for combined residues of hexythiazox, trans 5( 4 chlorophenyl) N cyclohexyl 4 methyl 2 oxothiazolidine 3 carboxamide and its metabolites containing the 4 chlorophenyl 4 methyl 2 oxo 3 thiazolidine moiety, in or on date, dried fruit at 1.0 ppm.

VI. Objections and Hearing Requests Under section 408( g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. Although the procedures in those regulations require some modification to reflect the amendments made to the FFDCA by the FQPA, EPA will continue to use those procedures, with appropriate adjustments, until the necessary modifications can be made. The new section 408( g) of the FFDCA provides essentially the same process for persons to `` object'' to a regulation for an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance issued by EPA under new section 408( d) of FFDCA, as was provided in the old sections 408 and 409 of the FFDCA. However, the period for filing objections is now 60 days, rather than 30 days.

A. What Do I Need to Do to File an Objection or Request a Hearing?

You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in this unit and in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number OPP   2002   0036 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before May 5, 2003. 1. Filing the request. Your objection must specify the specific provisions in the regulation that you object to, and the grounds for the objections ( 40 CFR 178.25). If a hearing is requested, the objections must include a statement of the factual issues( s) on which a hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on such issues, and a summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector ( 40 CFR 178.27). Information submitted in connection with an objection or hearing request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the information that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public record. Information not marked confidential may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Mail your written request to: Office of the Hearing Clerk ( 1900C), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001. You may also deliver your request to the Office of the Hearing Clerk in Rm. 104, Crystal Mall # 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA. The Office of the Hearing Clerk is open from 8 a. m. to 4 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Office of the Hearing Clerk is ( 703) 603   0061. 2. Tolerance fee payment. If you file an objection or request a hearing, you must also pay the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 180.33( i) or request a waiver of that fee pursuant to 40 CFR 180.33( m). You must mail the fee to: EPA Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, Office of Pesticide Programs, P. O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. Please identify the fee submission by labeling it `` Tolerance Petition Fees.'' EPA is authorized to waive any fee requirement `` when in the judgement of the Administrator such a waiver or refund is equitable and not contrary to the purpose of this subsection.'' For additional information regarding the waiver of these fees, you may contact James Tompkins by phone at ( 703) 305   5697, by e mail at tompkins. jim@ epa. gov, or by mailing a request for information to Mr. Tompkins at Registration Division ( 7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001. If you would like to request a waiver of the tolerance objection fees, you must mail your request for such a waiver to: James Hollins, Information Resources and Services Division ( 7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001. 3. Copies for the Docket. In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in Unit VI. A., you should also send a copy of your request to the PIRIB for its VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 18: 49 Mar 04, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 05MRR1. SGM 05MRR1 10376 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2003 / Rules and Regulations inclusion in the official record that is described in Unit I. B. 1. Mail your copies, identified by docket ID number OPP   2002   0036, to: Public Information and Records Integrity Branch ( PIRIB), Information Resources and Services Division ( 7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001. In person or by courier, bring a copy to the location of the PIRIB described in Unit I. B. 1. You may also send an electronic copy of your request via e mail to: oppdocket epa. gov. Please use an ASCII file format and avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption. Copies of electronic objections and hearing requests will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 6.1/ 8.0 or ASCII file format. Do not include any CBI in your electronic copy. You may also submit an electronic copy of your request at many Federal Depository Libraries.

B. When Will the Agency Grant a Request for a Hearing? A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would, if established resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the contrary; and resolution of the factual issues( s) in the manner sought by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested ( 40 CFR 178.32).

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408( d) of the FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget ( OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review ( 58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of significance, this rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use ( 66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act ( PRA), 44 U. S. C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 ( UMRA) ( Public Law 104   4). Nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations ( 59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks ( 62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12( d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 ( NTTAA), Public Law 104   113, section 12( d) ( 15 U. S. C. 272 note). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under section 408( d) of the FFDCA, such as the tolerance in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act ( RFA) ( 5 U. S. C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. In addition, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism ( 64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure `` meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' `` Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations that have `` substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers and food retailers, not States. This action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of section 408( n)( 4) of the FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency has determined that this rule does not have any `` tribal implications'' as described in Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments ( 65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure `` meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.'' `` Policies that have tribal implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations that have `` substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.'' This rule will not have substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.

VIII. Congressional Review Act The Congressional Review Act, 5 U. S. C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U. S. Senate, the U. S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final rule is not a `` major rule'' as defined by 5 U. S. C. 804( 2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: February 24, 2003. Debra Edwards, Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180   [ AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U. S. C. 321( q), 346( a) and 371.

2. Section 180.448 is amended by alphabetically adding the commodity `` date, dried fruit'' to the table in VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 18: 49 Mar 04, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 05MRR1. SGM 05MRR1 10377 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2003 / Rules and Regulations paragraph ( a), and by removing and reserving paragraph ( b) as follows: § 180.448 Hexythiazox; tolerances for residues. ( a) * * *

Commodity Parts per million Date, dried fruit 1.0 ( b) [ Reserved] * * * * * [ FR Doc. 03   5194 Filed 3   4   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [ OPP   2003   0075; FRL   7296   2]

Folpet; Pesticide Tolerance AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a tolerance for residues of folpet ( N ( trichloromethylthio) phthalimide) in or on hop, dried cones. Makhteshim Agan of North America Inc. requested this tolerance under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ( FFDCA), as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 ( FQPA). DATES: This regulation is effective March 5, 2003. Objections and requests for hearings, identified by docket ID number OPP   2003   0075, must be received on or before May 5, 2003. ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests   may be submitted electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/ courier. Follow the detailed instructions as provided in Unit VI. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Registration Division ( 7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001; telephone number: ( 703) 305   7618; email address: keigwin. richard@ epa. gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:   Industry ( NAICS 111), Crop production.   Industry ( NAICS 112), Animal production.   Industry ( NAICS 311), Food manufacturing.   Industry ( NAICS 32532), Pesticide manufacturing. This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be affected. The North American Industrial Classification System ( NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information? 1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this action under docket identification ( ID) number OPP   2003   0075. The official public docket consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other information related to this action. Although a part of the official docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business Information ( CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public docket is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch ( PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall # 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket telephone number is ( 703) 305   5805. 2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the `` Federal Register'' listings at http:// www. epa. gov/ fedrgstr/. A frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 is available at http:// www. access. gpo. gov/ nara/ cfr/ cfrhtml__ 00/ Title__ 40/ 40cfr180_(_ 00. html, a beta site currently under development. To access the OPPTS Harmonized Guidelines referenced in this document, go directly to the guidelines at http:// www. epa. gov/ opptsfrs/ home/ guidelin. htm. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket/ to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I. B. 1. Once in the system, select `` search,'' then key in the appropriate docket ID number.

II. Background and Statutory Findings In the Federal Register of January 9, 2003 ( 68 FR 1182) ( FRL   7287   7), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408 of FFDCA, 21 U. S. C. 346a, as amended by FQPA ( Public Law 104   170), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition ( PP 2E6512) by Makhteshim Agan of North America Inc., 551 Fifth Ave., Suite 1100 New York, NY 10176. That notice included a summary of the petition prepared by Makhteshim Agan of North America Inc., the registrant. There were no comments received in response to the notice of filing. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.191 be amended by establishing a tolerance for residues of the fungicide folpet, ( N   ( trichloromethylthio) phthalimide), in or on hop at 120 parts per million ( ppm). Section 408( b)( 2)( A)( i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish a tolerance ( the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is `` safe.'' Section 408( b)( 2)( A)( ii) of the FFDCA defines `` safe'' to mean that `` there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure. Section 408( b)( 2)( C) of the FFDCA requires EPA to give special consideration to VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 18: 49 Mar 04, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 05MRR1. SGM 05MRR1


7534 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2003 / Notices Dated: February 10, 2003. Vanessa T. Vu, Director, EPA Science Advisory Board Staff Office. [ FR Doc. 03   3703 Filed 2   13   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ OPP   2003   0038; FRL   7291   5]

Eastern Research Group, Inc. and Geologics Corp.; Transfer of Data AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice announces that pesticide related information submitted to EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs ( OPP) pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act ( FIFRA) and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ( FFDCA), including information that may have been claimed as Confidential Business Information ( CBI) by the submitter, will be tranferred to Eastern Research Group, Inc. and its subcontractor, Geologics Corp., in accordance with 40 CFR 2.307( h)( 3) and 2.308( i)( 2). Eastern Research Group, Inc. and its subcontractor, Geologics Corp. have been awarded a contract to perform work for the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance ( OECA), and access to this information will enable Eastern Research Group, Inc. and its subcontractor, Geologics Corp., to fulfill the obligations of the contract. DATES: Eastern Research Group, Inc. and its subcontractor, Geologics Corp., will be given access to this information on or before February 19, 2003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erik R. Johnson, FIFRA Security Officer, Information Resources and Services Division ( 7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001; telephone number: ( 703) 305   7248; e mail address: johnson. erik@ epa. gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

This action applies to the public in general. As such, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?

1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this action under docket identification ( ID) number OPP   2003   0038. The official public docket consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other information related to this action. Although a part of the official docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business Information ( CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public docket is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch ( PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall # 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket telephone number is ( 703) 305   5805. 2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the `` Federal Register'' listings at http:// www. epa. gov/ fedrgstr/. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket/ to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I. B. 1. Once in the system, select `` search,'' then key in the appropriate docket ID number.

II. Contractor Requirements Under Contract No. 68   W9   9057, Eastern Research Group, Inc. and its subcontractor, Contract No. 68   W0   1031, Geologics Corp., will support EPA's compliance monitoring and enforcement efforts under the Office of Compliance, by performing tasks in the following areas: Training, data management, compliance monitoring, compliance inspections, targeting, sector based support, outreach, sampling and sample analysis, and pollution prevention. OPP has determined that access by Eastern Research Group, Inc., and its subcontractor, Geologics Corp., to information on all pesticide chemicals is necessary for the performance of this contract. Some of this information may be entitled to confidential treatment. The information has been submitted to EPA under sections 3, 4, 6, and 7 of FIFRA and under sections 408 and 409 of FFDCA. In accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR 2.307( h)( 2), the contract with Eastern Research Group, Inc. and its subcontractor, Geologics Corp., prohibits use of the information for any purpose not specified in the contract; prohibits disclosure of the information to a third party without prior written approval from the Agency; and requires that each official and employee of the contractor sign an agreement to protect the information from unauthorized release and to handle it in accordance with the FIFRA Information Security Manual. In addition, Eastern Research Group, Inc. and its subcontractor, Geologics Corp., are required to submit for EPA approval a security plan under which any CBI will be secured and protected against unauthorized release or compromise. No information will be provided to Eastern Research Group, Inc., and its subcontractor, Geologics Corp., until the requirements in this document have been fully satisfied. Records of information provided to Eastern Research Group, Inc., and its subcontractor, Geologics Corp., will be maintained by EPA Project Officers for this contract. All information supplied to Eastern Research Group, Inc. and its subcontractor, Geologics Corp., by EPA for use in connection with this contract will be returned to EPA when Eastern Research Group, Inc. and its subcontractor, Geologics Corp., have completed their work.

List of Subjects Environmental protection, Business and industry, Government contracts, Government property, Security measures.

Dated: February 3, 2003.

Linda Vlier Moos,

Acting Director, Information Resources and Services Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. [ FR Doc. 03   3581 Filed 2   13   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   S VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 19: 15 Feb 13, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 14FEN1. SGM 14FEN1