[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 173 (Friday, September 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42566-42567]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19072]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Rule 0-1, SEC File No. 270-472, OMB Control No. 3235-0531

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 350l et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') plans to submit to the Office of Management
and Budget a request for extension of the previous approved collection
of information discussed below.
    The Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') \1\ establishes a
comprehensive framework for regulating the organization and operation
of investment companies (``funds''). A principal objective of the Act
is to protect fund investors by addressing the conflicts of interest
that exist between funds and their investment advisers and other
affiliated persons. The Act places significant responsibility on the
fund board of directors in overseeing the operations of the fund and
policing the relevant conflicts of interest.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 80a.
    \2\ For example, fund directors must approve investment advisory
and distribution contracts. See 15 U.S.C. 80a-15(a), (b), and (c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In one of its first releases, the Commission exercised its
rulemaking authority pursuant to sections 38(a) and 40(b) of the Act by
adopting rule 0-1 (17 CFR 270.0-1).\3\ Rule 0-1, as subsequently
amended on numerous occasions, provides definitions for the terms used
by the Commission in the rules and regulations it has adopted pursuant
to the Act. The rule also contains a number of rules of construction
for terms that are defined either in the Act itself or elsewhere in the
Commission's rules and regulations. Finally, rule 0-1 defines terms
that serve as conditions to the availability of certain of the
Commission's exemptive rules. More specifically, the term ``independent
legal counsel,'' as defined in rule 0-1, sets out conditions that funds
must meet in order to rely on any of ten exemptive rules (``exemptive
rules'') under the Act.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Investment Company Act Release No. 4 (Oct. 29, 1940) (5 FR
4316 (Oct. 31, 1940)). Note that rule 0-1 was originally adopted as
rule N-1.
    \4\ The relevant exemptive rules are: Rule 10f-3 (17 CFR
270.10f-3), rule 12b-1 (17 CFR 270.12b-1), rule 15a-4(b)(2) (17 CFR
270.15a-4(b)(2)), rule 17a-7 (17 CFR 270.17a-7), rule 17a-8 (17 CFR
270.17a-8), rule 17d-1(d)(7) (17 CFR 270.17d-1(d)(7)), rule 17e-1(c)
(17 CFR 270.17e-1(c)), rule 17g-1 (17 CFR 270.17g-1), rule 18f-3 (17
CFR 270.18f-3), and rule 23c-3 (17 CFR 270.23c-3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission amended rule 0-1 to include the definition of the
term ``independent legal counsel'' in 2001.\5\ This amendment was
designed to enhance the effectiveness of fund boards of directors and
to better enable investors to assess the independence of those
directors. The Commission also amended the exemptive rules to require
that any person who serves as legal counsel to the independent
directors of any fund that relies on any of the exemptive rules must be
an ``independent legal counsel.'' This requirement was added because
independent directors can better perform the responsibilities assigned
to them under the Act and the rules if they have the assistance of
truly independent legal counsel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Role of Independent Directors of Investment Companies,
Investment Company Act Release No. 24816 (Jan. 2, 2001) (66 FR 3735
(Jan. 16, 2001)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the board's counsel has represented the fund's investment
adviser, principal underwriter, administrator (collectively,
``management organizations'') or their ``control persons'' \6\ during
the past two years, rule 0-1 requires that the board's independent
directors make a determination about the adequacy of the counsel's
independence. A majority of the board's independent directors are
required to reasonably determine, in the exercise of their judgment,
that the counsel's prior or current representation of the management
organizations or their control persons was sufficiently limited to
conclude that it is unlikely to adversely affect the counsel's
professional judgment and legal representation. Rule 0-1 also requires
that a record for the basis of this determination is made in the
minutes of the directors' meeting. In addition, the independent
directors must have obtained an undertaking from the counsel to provide
them with the information necessary to make their determination and to
update promptly that information when the person begins to represent a
management organization or control person, or when he or she materially
increases his or her representation. Generally, the independent
directors must re-evaluate their determination no less frequently than
annually.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ A ``control person'' is any person--other than a fund--
directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common
control, with any of the fund's management organizations. See 17 CFR
270.01(a)(6)(iv)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any fund that relies on one of the exemptive rules must comply with
the requirements in the definition of ``independent legal counsel''
under rule 0-1. We assume that approximately 3,108 funds rely on at
least one of the exemptive rules annually.\7\ We further assume that
the independent directors of approximately one-third (1,036) of those
funds would need to make the required determination in order for their
counsel to meet the definition of

independent legal counsel.\8\ We estimate that each of these 1,036
funds would be required to spend, on average, 0.75 hours annually to
comply with the recordkeeping requirement associated with this
determination, for a total annual burden of approximately 777 hours.
Based on this estimate, the total annual cost for all funds' compliance
with this rule is approximately $168,350. To calculate this total
annual cost, the Commission staff assumed that approximately two-thirds
of the total annual hour burden (518 hours) would be incurred by a
compliance manager with an average hourly wage rate of $292 per
hour,\9\ and one-third of the annual hour burden (259 hours) would be
incurred by compliance clerk with an average hourly wage rate of $66
per hour.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Based on statistics compiled by Commission staff, we
estimate that there are approximately 3,453 funds that could rely on
one or more of the exemptive rules (this figure reflects the three-
year average of open-end and closed-end funds (3,349) and business
development companies (104)). Of those funds, we assume that
approximately 90 percent (3,108) actually rely on at least one
exemptive rules annually.
    \8\ We assume that the independent directors of the remaining
two-thirds of those funds will choose not to have counsel, or will
rely on counsel who has not recently represented the fund's
management organizations or control persons. In both circumstances,
it would not be necessary for the fund's independent directors to
make a determination about their counsel's independence.
    \9\ The estimated hourly wages used in this PRA analysis were
derived from the Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association's Reports on Management and Professional Earnings in the
Securities Industry (2013) (modified to account for an 1800-hour
work year and multiplied by 5.35 to account for bonuses, firm size,
employee benefits and overhead) (adjusted for inflation), and Office
Salaries in the Securities Industry (2013) (modified to account for
an 1800-hour work year and multiplied by 2.93 to account for
bonuses, firm size, employee benefits and overhead) (adjusted for
inflation).
    \10\ (518 x $292/hour) + (259 x $66/hour) = $168,350.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    These burden hour estimates are based upon the Commission staff's
experience and discussions with the fund industry. The estimates of
average burden hours are made solely for the purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act. These estimates are not derived from a comprehensive or
even a representative survey or study of the costs of Commission rules.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information has practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burdens
of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burdens of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549; or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: September 5, 2017.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-19072 Filed 9-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: July 5, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 128)]
[Notices]
[Page 39087-39089]
[DOCID:fr05jy11-60]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC11-90-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Indiana, Inc., Wabash Valley Power
Association, Inc., Duke Energy Vermillion II, LLC.

    Description: Duke Energy Vermillion II, LLC, et al. application for
authorization under section 203 of the Federal Power Act.
    Filed Date: 06/22/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110622-5076.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 13, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG11-96-000.
    Applicants: Stony Creek Energy LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Stony Creek Energy LLC under EG11-96.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110623-5036.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 14, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2547-002.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator, Inc. submits
tariff filing per 35: Clarification of Import Supplier Guarantee
Formula to be effective 5/18/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/22/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110622-5075.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 6, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3120-001.
    Applicants: Genon Power Midwest, LP.
    Description: Genon Power Midwest, LP submits tariff filing per 35:
Reactive Rate Schedule Compliance to be effective 6/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/22/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110622-5057.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3443-002.
    Applicants: UNS Electric, Inc.
    Description: UNS Electric, Inc. submits tariff filing per 35: UNSE
SGIA Compliance Filing to be effective 4/28/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/22/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110622-5066.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3444-002.
    Applicants: Tucson Electric Power Company.
    Description: Tucson Electric Power Company submits tariff filing
per 35: TEP SGIA Compliance Filing to be effective 4/28/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/22/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110622-5052.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3458-001.
    Applicants: Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin.
    Description: Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation
submits tariff filing per 35.17(b): 2011-6-23--NSPW-DPC R&R Pole Lic
Agmt--295 to be effective 3/31/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110623-5040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 14, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3581-001.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC, Monongahela Power Company.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.17(b): Monongahela Power, et al., submits Errata to the Third
Revised Service Agreement 1395 to be effective 5/17/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/22/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110622-5026.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3847-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Mexico.
    Description: Public Service Company of New Mexico submits tariff
filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: First Revised Service Agreement No. 317 to
be effective 6/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/22/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110622-5000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3848-000.
    Applicants: NSTAR Electric Company.
    Description: Tariff Filing of NSTAR Electric Company.
    Filed Date: 06/21/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110621-5121.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, July 12, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3849-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits tariff
filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: Amendment to IFA with CSDLA to be effective
6/23/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/22/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110622-5032.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3850-000.
    Applicants: NorthWestern Corporation.
    Description: NorthWestern Corporation submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: OATT (MT) Revision for Intra-Hour Scheduling to be
effective 7/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/22/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110622-5045.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3851-000.
    Applicants: Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation.
    Description: Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: 2011-6-22--NSP-WPL-Cert of
Con--311 to be effective 6/20/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/22/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110622-5047.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3852-000.
    Applicants: Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation.
    Description: Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: 2011-6-22--NSPW-WPL-Cert of
Con--311 to be effective 6/20/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/22/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110622-5048.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3853-000.
    Applicants: Black Hills Power, Inc.
    Description: Black Hills Power, Inc. submits tariff filing per 35:
Revised Baseline OATT of Black Hills Power, Inc. to be effective 9/30/
2010.
    Filed Date: 06/22/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110622-5079.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3854-000.
    Applicants: New York State Electric & Gas Corporation.
    Description: New York State Electric & Gas Corporation submits
tariff filing per 35.1: NYSEG Facilities Agreement with NYPA 2011
Update to be effective 9/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/22/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110622-5080.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3855-000.
    Applicants: Black Hills Power, Inc.
    Description: Black Hills Power, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: Black Hills Power, Inc., JOATT Section 23 to be
effective 6/23/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/22/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110622-5085.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3856-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: 2011-06-22 CAISO BCR-ED
Amendment to be effective 6/23/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/22/2011.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 13, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3857-000.
    Applicants: Milford Power Company, LLC.
    Description: Milford Power Company, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.37: Revisions to Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 6/24/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110623-5016.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 14, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3858-000.
    Applicants: ECP Energy I, LLC.
    Description: ECP Energy I, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.37:
Revisions to Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 6/24/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110623-5038.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 14, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3859-000.
    Applicants: Dighton Power, LLC.
    Description: Dighton Power, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.37:
Revisions to Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 6/24/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110623-5039.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 14, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3860-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: KEPCo, Revisions to Attachment A--Delivery Points to
be effective 8/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110623-5041.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 14, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3861-000.
    Applicants: Empire Generating Co, LLC.
    Description: Empire Generating Co, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.37: Revisions to Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 6/24/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110623-5050.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 14, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3862-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp's Notice of Termination of Installation
Agreement between PacifiCorp and WAPA of Spring Creek Substation
Capacitor Bank.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110623-5068.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 14, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3863-000.
    Applicants: ECP Energy I, LLC.
    Description: ECP Energy I, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.37:
Revisions to Market-Based Rate Filing to be effective 6/24/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110623-5072.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 14, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3864-000.
    Applicants: EquiPower Resources Management, LLC.
    Description: EquiPower Resources Management, LLC submits tariff
filing per 35.37: Revisions to Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective
6/24/2011.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110623-5073.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 14, 2011.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    As it relates to any qualifying facility filings, the notices of
self-certification [or self-recertification] listed above, do not
institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status. A notice
of self-certification [or self-recertification] simply provides
notification that the entity making the filing has determined the
facility named in the notice meets the applicable criteria to be a
qualifying facility. Intervention and/or protest do not lie in dockets
that are qualifying facility self-certifications or self-
recertifications. Any person seeking to challenge such qualifying
facility status may do so by filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR
292.207(d)(iii). Intervention and protests may be filed in response to
notices of qualifying facility dockets other than self-certifications
and self-recertifications.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: June 23, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-16692 Filed 7-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 180 (Monday, September 17, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56987-56989]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22542]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 180 / Monday, September 17, 2012 /
Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0634; Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-016-AD;
Amendment 39-17182; AD 2012-18-06]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Piaggio
Aero Industries S.p.A. Model P-180 Airplanes. This AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an
aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as jamming of the external bearing of the screwjack drive
gear, which resulted in failure of the main wing outboard flap external
actuator. We are issuing this AD to require actions to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective October 22, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of October 22,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Piaggio Aero
Industries S.p.A--Airworthiness Office, Via Luigi Cibrario, 4-16154
Genova-Italy; phone: +39<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: +39<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.piaggioaero.com/#/en/aftersales/service-support. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on June 15, 2012 (77 FR
35888). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    Failures of the Main Wing Outboard Flap external actuator have
been reported by P.180 operators.
    The investigation revealed that due to jamming of the external
bearing, the screwjack drive gear disengaged from its seat and the
external actuator stopped, while the inner one continued its run.
    This condition, if not corrected, could lead to an asymmetrical
flap actuators operation and cause an interference between the flap
and adjacent aileron, possibly resulting in reduced control of the
aeroplane.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires the
installation of a covering cage on the screwjack, as a temporary
corrective action, which does not allow the disengagement of the
affected gear.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (77 FR 35888, June 15, 2012) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 110 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take about 6 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $2,770 per
product.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the AD on U.S.
operators to be $360,800, or $3,280 per product.
    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States,

or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2012-18-06 PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A: Amendment 39-17182; Docket
No. FAA-2012-0634; Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-016-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective October 22,
2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A Model P-180
airplanes, serial numbers (S/Ns) 1002 and 1004 through 1223,
certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 27: Flight
Controls.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. We are issuing this AD to require actions to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, before October 22, 2012 (the effective date
of this AD), following the Accomplishment Instructions of Piaggio
Aero Industries S.p.A. Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 80-0318,
revision 2, dated March 28, 2012, do the following actions:
    (1) For S/Ns 1002 and 1004 through 1135:
    (i) For aircraft with less than 1,500 hours total time-in-
service (TIS) at the effective date of this AD: Within 1,500 hours
TIS after October 22, 2012 (the effective date of this AD) or within
12 calendar months after October 22, 2012 (the effective date of
this AD), whichever occurs first, install covering cages on both
left and right wing outboard flap external screwjacks. Follow the
Accomplishment Instructions of Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A.
Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 80-0318, revision 2, dated March 28,
2012.
    (ii) For aircraft with 1,500 hours total TIS or more but less
than 2,800 hours total TIS at October 22, 2012 (the effective date
of this AD): Upon or before reaching a total of 3,000 hours TIS
after October 22, 2012 (the effective date of this AD) or within 12
calendar months after October 22, 2012 (the effective date of this
AD), whichever occurs first, install covering cages on both left and
right wing outboard flap external screwjacks. Follow the
Accomplishment Instructions of Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A.
Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 80-0318, revision 2, dated March 28,
2012.
    (iii) For aircraft with 2,800 hours total TIS or more at October
22, 2012 (the effective date of this AD): Within 200 hours TIS after
October 22, 2012 (the effective date of this AD) or within 12
calendar months after October 22, 2012 (the effective date of this
AD), whichever occurs first, install covering cages on both left and
right wing outboard flap external screwjacks. Follow the
Accomplishment Instructions of Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A.
Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 80-0318, revision 2, dated March 28,
2012.
    (2) For S/Ns 1136 through 1223 (inclusive): Within 1,500 hours
TIS after October 22, 2012 (the effective date of this AD) or within
12 calendar months after October 22, 2012 (the effective date of
this AD), whichever occurs first, install covering cages on both
left and right wing outboard flap external screwjacks. Follow the
Accomplishment Instructions of Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A.
Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 80-0318, revision 2, dated March 28,
2012.
    Note to paragraph (f) of this AD: S/Ns 1224 and subsequent have
covering cages on both left and right wing outboard flap external
screwjacks installed during production.

(g) Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information

    This AD provides credit for the actions required in this AD if
already done before October 22, 2012 (the effective date of this AD)
following Service Bulletin No. 80-0318, dated October 24, 2011;
Service Bulletin No. 80-0318, revision 1, dated February 3, 2012;
and Service Bulletin No. 80-0318, revision 2, dated March 28, 2012.

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal
inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

(i) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.:
2012-0066, dated April 24, 2012; Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A.
Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 80-0318, dated October 24, 2011;
Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A. Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 80-
0318, revision 1, dated February 3, 2012; and Piaggio Aero
Industries S.p.A. Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 80-0318,

revision 2, dated March 28, 2012, for related information.

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A. Mandatory Service Bulletin
No. 80-0318, dated October 24, 2011;
    (ii) Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A. Mandatory Service Bulletin
No. 80-0318, revision 1, dated February 3, 2012; and
    (iii) Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A. Mandatory Service Bulletin
No. 80-0318, revision 2, dated March 28, 2012.
    (3) For PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A service information
identified in this AD, contact Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A--
Airworthiness Office, Via Luigi Cibrario, 4-16154 Genova-Italy;
phone: +39<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: +39<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.piaggioaero.com/#/en/aftersales/service-support.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 29, 2012.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-22542 Filed 9-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


888's OATTs.
INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT.......         [check]   ...............  Contract that provides the terms and
                                                                     conditions for a generator, distribution
                                                                     system owner, transmission owner,
                                                                     transmission provider, or transmission
                                                                     system to physically connect to a
                                                                     transmission system or distribution system.
MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT............         [check]   ...............  Agreement to participate and be subject to
                                                                     rules of a system operator.
MUST RUN AGREEMENT..............         [check]   ...............  An agreement that requires a unit to run.
NEGOTIATED-RATE TRANSMISSION....         [check]          [check]   Transmission performed under a negotiated
                                                                     rate contract (applies only to merchant
                                                                     transmission companies).
NETWORK.........................         [check]   ...............  Transmission service under contract
                                                                     providing network service.
NETWORK OPERATING AGREEMENT.....         [check]   ...............  An executed agreement that contains the
                                                                     terms and conditions under which a network
                                                                     customer operates its facilities and the
                                                                     technical and operational matters
                                                                     associated with the implementation of
                                                                     network integration transmission service.
OTHER...........................         [check]          [check]   Product name not otherwise included.
POINT-TO-POINT AGREEMENT........         [check]   ...............  Transmission service under contract between
                                                                     specified Points of Receipt and Delivery.
REACTIVE SUPPLY & VOLTAGE                [check]          [check]   Production or absorption of reactive power
 CONTROL.                                                            to maintain voltage levels on transmission
                                                                     systems (Ancillary Service).
REAL POWER TRANSMISSION LOSS....         [check]          [check]   The loss of energy, resulting from
                                                                     transporting power over a transmission
                                                                     system.
REGULATION & FREQUENCY RESPONSE.         [check]          [check]   Service providing for continuous balancing
                                                                     of resources (generation and interchange)
                                                                     with load, and for maintaining scheduled
                                                                     interconnection frequency by committing on-
                                                                     line generation where output is raised or
                                                                     lowered and by other non-generation
                                                                     resources capable of providing this service
                                                                     as necessary to follow the moment-by-moment
                                                                     changes in load (Ancillary Service).
REQUIREMENTS SERVICE............         [check]          [check]   Firm, load-following power supply necessary
                                                                     to serve a specified share of customer's
                                                                     aggregate load during the term of the
                                                                     agreement. Requirements service may include
                                                                     some or all of the energy, capacity and
                                                                     ancillary service products. (If the
                                                                     components of the requirements service are
                                                                     priced separately, they should be reported
                                                                     separately in the transactions tab.)
SCHEDULE SYSTEM CONTROL &                [check]          [check]   Scheduling, confirming and implementing an
 DISPATCH.                                                           interchange schedule with other Balancing
                                                                     Authorities, including intermediary
                                                                     Balancing Authorities providing
                                                                     transmission service, and ensuring
                                                                     operational security during the interchange
                                                                     transaction (Ancillary Service).
SPINNING RESERVE................         [check]          [check]   Unloaded synchronized generating capacity
                                                                     that is immediately responsive to system
                                                                     frequency and that is capable of being
                                                                     loaded in a short time period or non-
                                                                     generation resources capable of providing
                                                                     this service (Ancillary Service).

SUPPLEMENTAL RESERVE............         [check]          [check]   Service needed to serve load in the event of
                                                                     a system contingency, available with
                                                                     greater delay than SPINNING RESERVE. This
                                                                     service may be provided by generating units
                                                                     that are on-line but unloaded, by quick-
                                                                     start generation, or by interruptible load
                                                                     or other non-generation resources capable
                                                                     of providing this service (Ancillary
                                                                     Service).
SYSTEM OPERATING AGREEMENTS.....         [check]   ...............  An executed agreement that contains the
                                                                     terms and conditions under which a system
                                                                     or network customer shall operate its
                                                                     facilities and the technical and
                                                                     operational matters associated with the
                                                                     implementation of network.
TOLLING ENERGY..................         [check]          [check]   Energy sold from a plant whereby the buyer
                                                                     provides fuel to a generator (seller) and
                                                                     receives power in return for pre-
                                                                     established fees.
TRANSMISSION OWNERS AGREEMENT...         [check]   ...............  The agreement that establishes the terms and
                                                                     conditions under which a transmission owner
                                                                     transfers operational control over
                                                                     designated transmission facilities.
UPLIFT..........................         [check]          [check]   A make-whole payment by an RTO/ISO to a
                                                                     utility.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              EQR Data Dictionary--Appendix B. Balancing Authority
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Balancing authority                                 Abbreviation               Outside U.S.*
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AESC, LLC--Wheatland CIN.................................  AEWC................................  ...............
Alabama Electric Cooperative, Inc........................  AEC.................................  ...............
Alberta Electric System Operator.........................  AESO................................         [check]
Alliant Energy Corporate Services, LLC--East.............  ALTE................................  ...............
Alliant Energy Corporate Services, LLC--West.............  ALTW................................  ...............
Ameren Transmission......................................  AMRN................................  ...............
Ameren Transmission. Illinois............................  AMIL................................  ...............
Ameren Transmission. Missouri............................  AMMO................................  ...............
American Transmission Systems, Inc.......................  FE..................................  ...............
Aquila Networks--Kansas..................................  WPEK................................  ...............
Aquila Networks--Missouri Public Service.................  MPS.................................  ...............
Aquila Networks--West Plains Dispatch....................  WPEC................................  ...............
Arizona Public Service Company...........................  AZPS................................  ...............
Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc.....................  AECI................................  ...............
Avista Corp..............................................  AVA.................................  ...............
Batesville Balancing Authority...........................  BBA.................................  ...............
Big Rivers Electric Corp.................................  BREC................................  ...............
Board of Public Utilities................................  KACY................................  ...............
Bonneville Power Administration Transmission.............  BPAT................................  ...............
British Columbia Transmission Corporation................  BCTC................................         [check]
California Independent System Operator...................  CISO................................  ...............
Carolina Power & Light Company--CPLW.....................  CPLW................................  ...............
Carolina Power and Light Company--East...................  CPLE................................  ...............
Central and Southwest....................................  CSWS................................  ...............
Central Illinois Light Co................................  CILC................................  ...............
Chelan County PUD........................................  CHPD................................  ...............
Cinergy Corporation......................................  CIN.................................  ...............
City of Homestead........................................  HST.................................  ...............
City of Independence P&L Dept............................  INDN................................  ...............
City of Tallahassee......................................  TAL.................................  ...............
City Water Light & Power.................................  CWLP................................  ...............
Cleco Power LLC..........................................  CLEC................................  ...............
Columbia Water & Light...................................  CWLD................................  ...............
Comision Federal de Electricidad.........................  CFE.................................         [check]
Constellation Energy Control and Dispatch--Arkansas......  PUPP................................  ...............
Constellation Energy Control and Dispatch--City of         BUBA................................  ...............
 Benton, AR.
Constellation Energy Control and Dispatch--City of         DERS................................  ...............
 Ruston, LA.
Constellation Energy Control and Dispatch--Conway,         CNWY................................  ...............
 Arkansas.
Constellation Energy Control and Dispatch--Gila River....  GRMA................................  ...............
Constellation Energy Control and Dispatch--Harquehala....  HGMA................................  ...............
Constellation Energy Control and Dispatch--North Little    DENL................................  ...............
 Rock, Arkansas.
Constellation Energy Control and Dispatch--West Memphis,   WMUC................................  ...............
 Arkansas.
Dairyland Power Cooperative..............................  DPC.................................  ...............
DECA, LLC--Arlington Valley..............................  DEAA................................  ...............
Duke Energy Corporation..................................  DUK.................................  ...............
East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc.....................  EKPC................................  ...............
El Paso Electric.........................................  EPE.................................  ...............
Electric Energy, Inc.....................................  EEI.................................  ...............
Empire District Electric Co., The........................  EDE.................................  ...............

Entergy..................................................  EES.................................  ...............
ERCOT ISO................................................  ERCO................................  ...............
Florida Municipal Power Pool.............................  FMPP................................  ...............
Florida Power & Light....................................  FPL.................................  ...............
Florida Power Corporation................................  FPC.................................  ...............
Gainesville Regional Utilities...........................  GVL.................................  ...............
Georgia System Operations Corporation....................  GSOC................................  ...............
Georgia Transmission Corporation.........................  GTC.................................  ...............
Grand River Dam Authority................................  GRDA................................  ...............
Grant County PUD No. 2...................................  GCPD................................  ...............
Great River Energy.......................................  GRE.................................  ...............
Great River Energy.......................................  GREC................................  ...............
Great River Energy.......................................  GREN................................  ...............
Great River Energy.......................................  GRES................................  ...............
GridAmerica..............................................  GA..................................  ...............
Hoosier Energy...........................................  HE..................................  ...............
Hydro-Quebec, TransEnergie...............................  HQT.................................         [check]
Idaho Power Company......................................  IPCO................................  ...............
Illinois Power Co........................................  IP..................................  ...............
Illinois Power Co........................................  IPRV................................  ...............
Imperial Irrigation District.............................  IID.................................  ...............
Indianapolis Power & Light Company.......................  IPL.................................  ...............
ISO New England Inc......................................  ISNE................................  ...............
JEA......................................................  JEA.................................  ...............
Kansas City Power & Light, Co............................  KCPL................................  ...............
Lafayette Utilities System...............................  LAFA................................  ...............
LG&E Energy Transmission Services........................  LGEE................................  ...............
Lincoln Electric System..................................  LES.................................  ...............
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power................  LDWP................................  ...............
Louisiana Energy & Power Authority.......................  LEPA................................  ...............
Louisiana Generating, LLC................................  LAGN................................  ...............
Madison Gas and Electric Company.........................  MGE.................................  ...............
Manitoba Hydro Electric Board, Transmission Services.....  MHEB................................         [check]
Michigan Electric Coordinated System.....................  MECS................................  ...............
Michigan Electric Coordinated System--CONS...............  CONS................................  ...............
Michigan Electric Coordinated System--DECO...............  DECO................................  ...............
MidAmerican Energy Company...............................  MEC.................................  ...............
Midwest ISO..............................................  MISO................................  ...............
Minnesota Power, Inc.....................................  MP..................................  ...............
Montana-Dakota Utilities Co..............................  MDU.................................  ...............
Muscatine Power and Water................................  MPW.................................  ...............
Nebraska Public Power District...........................  NPPD................................  ...............
Nevada Power Company.....................................  NEVP................................  ...............
New Brunswick Power Corporation..........................  NBPC................................         [check]
New Horizons Electric Cooperative........................  NHC1................................  ...............
New York Independent System Operator.....................  NYIS................................  ...............
North American Electric Reliability Council..............  TEST................................  ...............
Northern Indiana Public Service Company..................  NIPS................................  ...............
Northern States Power Company............................  NSP.................................  ...............
NorthWestern Energy......................................  NWMT................................  ...............
Ohio Valley Electric Corporation.........................  OVEC................................  ...............
Oklahoma Gas and Electric................................  OKGE................................  ...............
Ontario--Independent Electricity Market Operator.........  IMO.................................         [check]
OPPD CA/TP...............................................  OPPD................................  ...............
Otter Tail Power Company.................................  OTP.................................  ...............
P.U.D. No. 1 of Douglas County...........................  DOPD................................  ...............
PacifiCorp--East.........................................  PACE................................  ...............
PacifiCorp--West.........................................  PACW................................  ...............
PJM Interconnection......................................  PJM.................................  ...............
Portland General Electric................................  PGE.................................  ...............
Public Service Company of Colorado.......................  PSCO................................  ...............
Public Service Company of New Mexico.....................  PNM.................................  ...............
Puget Sound Energy Transmission..........................  PSEI................................  ...............
Reedy Creek Improvement District.........................  RC..................................  ...............
Sacramento Municipal Utility District....................  SMUD................................  ...............
Salt River Project.......................................  SRP.................................  ...............
Santee Cooper............................................  SC..................................  ...............
SaskPower Grid Control Centre............................  SPC.................................         [check]
Seattle City Light.......................................  SCL.................................  ...............
Seminole Electric Cooperative............................  SEC.................................  ...............
Sierra Pacific Power Co.--Transmission...................  SPPC................................  ...............
South Carolina Electric & Gas Company....................  SCEG................................  ...............

South Mississippi Electric Power Association.............  SME.................................  ...............
South Mississippi Electric Power Association.............  SMEE................................  ...............
Southeastern Power Administration--Hartwell..............  SEHA................................  ...............
Southeastern Power Administration--Russell...............  SERU................................  ...............
Southeastern Power Administration--Thurmond..............  SETH................................  ...............
Southern Company Services, Inc...........................  SOCO................................  ...............
Southern Illinois Power Cooperative......................  SIPC................................  ...............
Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.......................  SIGE................................  ...............
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency................  SMP.................................  ...............
Southwest Power Pool.....................................  SWPP................................  ...............
Southwestern Power Administration........................  SPA.................................  ...............
Southwestern Public Service Company......................  SPS.................................  ...............
Sunflower Electric Power Corporation.....................  SECI................................  ...............
Tacoma Power.............................................  TPWR................................  ...............
Tampa Electric Company...................................  TEC.................................  ...............
Tennessee Valley Authority ESO...........................  TVA.................................  ...............
Trading Hub..............................................  HUB.................................  ...............
TRANSLink Management Company.............................  TLKN................................  ...............
Tucson Electric Power Company............................  TEPC................................  ...............
Turlock Irrigation District..............................  TIDC................................  ...............
Upper Peninsula Power Co.................................  UPPC................................  ...............
Utilities Commission, City of New Smyrna Beach...........  NSB.................................  ...............
Westar Energy--MoPEP Cities..............................  MOWR................................  ...............
Western Area Power Administration--Colorado-Missouri.....  WACM................................  ...............
Western Area Power Administration--Lower Colorado........  WALC................................  ...............
Western Area Power Administration--Upper Great Plains      WAUE................................  ...............
 East.
Western Area Power Administration--Upper Great Plains      WAUW................................  ...............
 West.
Western Farmers Electric Cooperative.....................  WFEC................................  ...............
Western Resources dba Westar Energy......................  WR..................................  ...............
Wisconsin Energy Corporation.............................  WEC.................................  ...............
Wisconsin Public Service Corporation.....................  WPS.................................  ...............
Yadkin, Inc..............................................  YAD.................................  ...............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Balancing authorities outside the United States may only be used in the Contract Data section to identify
  specified receipt/delivery points in jurisdictional transmission contracts.

                  EQR Data Dictonary.--Appendix C. Hub
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             HUB                               Definition
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADHUB........................  The aggregated Locational Marginal Price
                                (``LMP'') nodes defined by PJM
                                Interconnection, LLC as the AEP/Dayton
                                Hub.
AEPGenHub....................  The aggregated Locational Marginal Price
                                (``LMP'') nodes defined by PJM
                                Interconnection, LLC as the AEPGenHub.
COB..........................  The set of delivery points along the
                                California-Oregon commonly identified as
                                and agreed to by the counterparties to
                                constitute the COB Hub.
Cinergy (into)...............  The set of delivery points commonly
                                identified as and agreed to by the
                                counterparties to constitute delivery
                                into the Cinergy balancing authority.
Cinergy Hub (MISO)...........  The aggregated Elemental Pricing nodes
                                (``Epnodes'') nodes defined by the
                                Midwest Independent Transmission System
                                Operator, Inc., as Cinergy Hub (MISO).
Entergy (into)...............  The set of delivery points commonly
                                identified as and agreed to by the
                                counterparties to constitute delivery
                                into the Entergy balancing authority.
FE Hub.......................  The aggregated Elemental Pricing nodes
                                (``Epnodes'') nodes defined by the
                                Midwest Independent Transmission System
                                Operator, Inc., as FE Hub (MISO).
Four Corners.................  The set of delivery points at the Four
                                Corners power plant commonly identified
                                as and agreed to by the counterparties
                                to constitute the Four Corners Hub.
Illinois Hub (MISO)..........  The aggregated Elemental Pricing nodes
                                (``Epnodes'') nodes defined by the
                                Midwest Independent Transmission System
                                Operator, Inc., as Illinois Hub (MISO).
Mead.........................  The set of delivery points at or near
                                Hoover Dam commonly identified as and
                                agreed to by the counterparties to
                                constitute the Mead Hub.
Michigan Hub (MISO)..........  The aggregated Elemental Pricing nodes
                                (``Epnodes'') nodes defined by the
                                Midwest Independent Transmission System
                                Operator, Inc., as Michigan Hub (MISO).
Mid-Columbia (Mid-C).........  The set of delivery points along the
                                Columbia River commonly identified as
                                and agreed to by the counterparties to
                                constitute the Mid-Columbia Hub.
Minnesota Hub (MISO).........  The aggregated Elemental Pricing nodes
                                (``Epnodes'') nodes defined by the
                                Midwest Independent Transmission System
                                Operator, Inc., as Minnesota Hub (MISO).
NEPOOL (Mass Hub)............  The aggregated Locational Marginal Price
                                (``LMP'') nodes defined by ISO New
                                England Inc., as Mass Hub.
NIHUB........................  The aggregated Locational Marginal Price
                                (``LMP'') nodes defined by PJM
                                Interconnection, LLC as the Northern
                                Illinois Hub.
NOB..........................  The set of delivery points along the
                                Nevada-Oregon border commonly identified
                                as and agreed to by the counterparties
                                to constitute the NOB Hub.

NP15.........................  The set of delivery points north of Path
                                15 on the California transmission grid
                                commonly identified as and agreed to by
                                the counterparties to constitute the
                                NP15 Hub.
NWMT.........................  The set of delivery points commonly
                                identified as and agreed to by the
                                counterparties to constitute delivery
                                into the Northwestern Energy Montana
                                balancing authority.
PJM East Hub.................  The aggregated Locational Marginal Price
                                nodes (``LMP'') defined by PJM
                                Interconnection, LLC as the PJM East
                                Hub.
PJM South Hub................  The aggregated Locational Marginal Price
                                (``LMP'') nodes defined by PJM
                                Interconnection, LLC as the PJM South
                                Hub.
PJM West Hub.................  The aggregated Locational Marginal Price
                                (``LMP'') nodes defined by PJM
                                Interconnection, LLC as the PJM Western
                                Hub.
Palo Verde...................  The switch yard at the Palo Verde nuclear
                                power station west of Phoenix in
                                Arizona. Palo Verde Hub includes the
                                Hassayampa switchyard 2 miles south of
                                Palo Verde.
SOCO (into)..................  The set of delivery points commonly
                                identified as and agreed to by the
                                counterparties to constitute delivery
                                into the Southern Company balancing
                                authority.
SP15.........................  The set of delivery points south of Path
                                15 on the California transmission grid
                                commonly identified as and agreed to by
                                the counterparties to constitute the
                                SP15 Hub.
TVA (into)...................  The set of delivery points commonly
                                identified as and agreed to by the
                                counterparties to constitute delivery
                                into the Tennessee Valley Authority
                                balancing authority.
ZP26.........................  The set of delivery points associated
                                with Path 26 on the California
                                transmission grid commonly identified as
                                and agreed to by the counterparties to
                                constitute the ZP26 Hub.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

               EQR Data Dictionary--Appendix D. Time Zone
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Time zone                           Definition
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AD..................................  Atlantic Daylight.
AP..................................  Atlantic Prevailing.
AS..................................  Atlantic Standard.
CD..................................  Central Daylight.
CP..................................  Central Prevailing.
CS..................................  Central Standard.
ED..................................  Eastern Daylight.
EP..................................  Eastern Prevailing.
ES..................................  Eastern Standard.
MD..................................  Mountain Daylight.
MP..................................  Mountain Prevailing.
MS..................................  Mountain Standard.
NA..................................  Not Applicable.
PD..................................  Pacific Daylight.
PP..................................  Pacific Prevailing.
PS..................................  Pacific Standard.
UT..................................  Universal Time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 EQR Data Dictionary--Appendix E. Units
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Units                              Definition
------------------------------------------------------------------------
KV...................................  Kilovolt.
KVA..................................  Kilovolt Amperes.
KVR..................................  Kilovar.
KW...................................  Kilowatt.
KWH..................................  Kilowatt Hour.
KW-DAY...............................  Kilowatt Day.
KW-MO................................  Kilowatt Month.
KW-WK................................  Kilowatt Week.
KW-YR................................  Kilowatt Year.
MVAR-YR..............................  Megavar Year.
MW...................................  Megawatt.
MWH..................................  Megawatt Hour.
MW-DAY...............................  Megawatt Day.
MW-MO................................  Megawatt Month.
MW-WK................................  Megawatt Week.
MW-YR................................  Megawatt Year.
RKVA.................................  Reactive Kilovolt
                                       Amperes.
FLAT RATE............................  Flat Rate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

               EQR Data Dictionary--Appendix F. Rate Units
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Rate units                           Definition
------------------------------------------------------------------------
$/KV..........................  Dollars per kilovolt.
$/KVA.........................  Dollars per kilovolt amperes.
$/KVR.........................  Dollars per kilovar.
$/KW..........................  Dollars per kilowatt.
$/KWH.........................  Dollars per kilowatt hour.
$/KW-DAY......................  Dollars per kilowatt day.
$/KW-MO.......................  Dollars per kilowatt month.
$/KW-WK.......................  Dollars per kilowatt week.
$/KW-YR.......................  Dollars per kilowatt year.
$/MW..........................  Dollars per megawatt.
$/MWH.........................  Dollars per megawatt hour.
$/MW-DAY......................  Dollars per megawatt day.
$/MW-MO.......................  Dollars per megawatt month.
$/MW-WK.......................  Dollars per megawatt week.
$/MW-YR.......................  Dollars per megawatt year.
$/MVAR-YR.....................  Dollars per megavar year.
$/RKVA........................  Dollars per reactive kilovar
                                amperes.
CENTS.........................  Cents.
CENTS/KVR.....................  Cents per kilovolt amperes.
CENTS/KWH.....................  Cents per kilowatt hour.
FLAT RATE.....................  Rate not specified in any
                                other units.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. E7-19484 Filed 10-3-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58417-58418]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23935]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 12:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 5, 2019.

PLACE: The meeting will be held at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS:  This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners,
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date,
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10),
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matters of the closed meeting will consist of the
following topics:

    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202)
551-5400.

    Dated: October 29, 2019.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-23935 Filed 10-29-19; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P