[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 168 (Friday, August 28, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53156-53158]
[FR Doc No: 2020-18936]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0217; Product Identifier 2019-NM-193-AD; Amendment
39-21183; AD 2020-15-20]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2019-03-
11, which applied to certain Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041
airplanes. AD 2019-03-11 required revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more
restrictive maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations.
This AD requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection
program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more restrictive
airworthiness limitations as specified in a European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is incorporated by reference. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective October 2, 2020.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of October 2,
2020.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain other publications listed in this AD as of March
29, 2019 (84 FR 5584, February 22, 2019).

ADDRESSES: For EASA material incorporated by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website
at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. For Airbus SAS service information
identified in this final rule, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
Office--EAL, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex,
France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this IBR material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0217.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0217; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace
Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-
3218; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2019-0288, dated November 28, 2019
(``EASA AD 2019-0288'') (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for all Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041 airplanes.
    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2019-03-11, Amendment 39-19563 (84 FR 5584,
February 22, 2019) (``AD 2019-03-11''). AD 2019-03-11 applied to
certain Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041 airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on April 10, 2020 (85 FR 20206). The
NPRM was prompted by a determination that new or more restrictive
airworthiness limitations are necessary. The NPRM proposed to require
revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable,
to incorporate new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations, as
specified in an EASA AD.
    The FAA is issuing this AD to address safety-significant latent
failures that would, in combination with one or more other specific
failures or events, result in a hazardous or catastrophic failure
condition. See the MCAI for additional background information.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The FAA received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety
and the public interest require adopting this final rule as proposed,
except for minor editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these
minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2019-0288 describes airworthiness limitations for
certification maintenance requirements.
    This AD also requires Airbus A350 Airworthiness Limitations Section
(ALS) Part 3, Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMR), Revision
04, dated December 15, 2017; and Airbus A350 ALS Part 3, Certification
Maintenance Requirements (CMR), Variation 4.2, dated July 26, 2018,
which the Director of the Federal Register approved for incorporation
by reference as of March 29, 2019 (84 FR 5584, February 22, 2019).
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 13 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

    The FAA estimates the total cost per operator for the retained
actions from AD 2019-03-11 to be $7,650 (90 workhours x $85 per work-
hour).
    The FAA has determined that revising the maintenance or inspection
program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator, although the
agency recognizes that this number may vary from operator to operator.
In the past, the agency has estimated that this action takes 1 work-
hour per airplane. Since operators incorporate maintenance or
inspection program changes for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has
determined that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-
airplane estimate. The FAA estimates the total cost per operator for
the new actions to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2019-03-11, Amendment 39-19563 (84 FR 5584, February 22, 2019), and
adding the following new AD:

2020-15-20 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39-21183; Docket No. FAA-2020-0217;
Product Identifier 2019-NM-193-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective October 2, 2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2019-03-11, Amendment 39-19563 (84 FR 5584,
February 22, 2019) (``AD 2019-03-11'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041
airplanes, certificated in any category, with an original
airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of
airworthiness issued on or before August 20, 2019.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Time Limits/
Maintenance Checks.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a determination that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address safety-significant latent failures that
would, in combination with one or more other specific failures or
events, result in a hazardous or catastrophic failure condition.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision, With No
Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2019-03-11, with no changes. Within 90 days after March 29, 2019
(the effective date of AD 2019-03-11), revise the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate
Airbus A350 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part 3,
Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMR), Revision 04, dated
December 15, 2017, as supplemented by Airbus A350 ALS Part 3,
Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMR), Variation 4.2, dated
July 26, 2018. The initial compliance time for accomplishing the
actions is at the applicable times specified in Airbus A350
Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part 3, Certification
Maintenance Requirements (CMR), Revision 04, dated December 15,
2017, as supplemented by Airbus A350 ALS Part 3, Certification
Maintenance Requirements (CMR), Variation 4.2, dated July 26, 2018;
or within 90 days after March 29, 2019; whichever occurs later.

(h) Retained No Alternative Actions or Intervals, With a New Exception

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2019-03-11, with a new exception. Except as required by paragraph
(i) of this AD, after the existing maintenance or inspection program
has been revised as required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no
alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals, may be used
unless the actions or intervals are approved as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.

(i) New Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision

    Except as specified in paragraph (j) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2019-0288, dated November 28, 2019 (``EASA AD 2019-0288'').
Accomplishing the maintenance or inspection program revision
required by this paragraph terminates the requirements of paragraph
(g) of this AD.

(j) Exceptions to EASA AD 2019-0288

    (1) The requirements specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of EASA
AD 2019-0288 do not apply to this AD.
    (2) Paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2019-0288 specifies revising ``the
approved AMP'' within 12 months after its effective date, but this
AD requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program,
as applicable, to incorporate the ``maintenance tasks and associated
thresholds and intervals'' specified in paragraph (3) of EASA AD
2019-0288 within 90 days after the effective date of this AD.
    (3) The initial compliance time for doing the tasks specified in
paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2019-0288 is at the applicable ``associated
thresholds'' specified in paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2019-0288, or
within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later.
    (4) The provisions specified in paragraphs (4) and (5) of EASA
AD 2019-0288 do not apply to this AD.
    (5) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2019-0288 does not apply
to this AD.

(k) New Provisions for Alternative Actions or Intervals

    After the maintenance or inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (i) of this AD, no alternative

actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals are allowed unless they are
approved as specified in the provisions of the ``Ref. Publications''
section of EASA AD 2019-0288.

(l) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (m) of this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus
SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any service information
referenced in EASA AD 2019-0288 that contains RC procedures and
tests: Except as required by paragraph (l)(2) of this AD, RC
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.

(m) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Kathleen Arrigotti,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
October 2, 2020.
    (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2019-0288,
dated November 28, 2019.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (4) The following service information was approved for IBR on
March 29, 2019 (84 FR 5584, February 22, 2019).
    (i) Airbus A350 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part 3,
Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMR), Revision 04, dated
December 15, 2017.
    (ii) Airbus A350 ALS Part 3, Certification Maintenance
Requirements (CMR), Variation 4.2, dated July 26, 2018.
    (5) For information about EASA AD 2019-0288, contact the EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet www.easa.europa.eu. You
may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (6) For information about Airbus SAS material, contact Airbus
SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine No: 2,
31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet
http://www.airbus.com.
    (7) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. This material may be found in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0217.
    (8) You may view this material that is incorporated by reference
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on July 16, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-18936 Filed 8-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


OSHA’S ERRATA SHEET

Transcript of the October 28, 2009, Public Hearing for

Minimum Approach Distances in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s

Proposed Standards for Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution

(Docket No. OSHA-S215-2006-0063)

CORRECTION NUMBER	PAGE	LINE(S)	CORRECTED

LANGUAGE	ORIGINAL

LANGUAGE

1	2	2	On behalf of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration

	On behalf of the Plaintiffs

2	2	20	Washington, DC	Washington, CD

3	7	12	to solicit information	to elicit information

4	8	12	should hand me these documents	should hand these documents

5	14	14	all of us here	all of here

6	15	1	and as part of this public hearing	and part of this public hearing

7	19	21

	not certain I’m understanding

	not certain understanding

8	20	1	we have allowed for the comment period?

	we have allowed comment period?

9	20	5	Well, that is not an entirely accurate

	Well, not an entirely accurate

10	20	12	time frames based on	time frames on

11	21	10	final Rule issued	final Rule issue

12	25	20	Subpart v rulemaking.

	Subpart V making.

CORRECTION NUMBER	PAGE	LINE(S)	CORRECTED

LANGUAGE	ORIGINAL

LANGUAGE

13	29	9-10	what David is trying

	what David trying

14	29	17-18	the OSHA team reviews the record	the OSHA and team review the record

15	58	9	indicated that employers may do	indicated that employers my do

16	58	13	if that has proved	if that is proved

17	61	6	Then we can treat that later.	Then we can trade later.

18	62	1-3	You mentioned that the MAD’s have evolved and changed many times over the years.  When did they more recently change in your Code?

	You mentioned that the MAD’s has evolved in change many times over the years.  When did they more recently change in you Code?

19	63	4	upon which it bases	upon which it basis

20	100	19	to the record	to the records

21	101	6	approach distances in OSHA’s 2005	approach distances and OSHA’s 2005

22	102	5	or a version like the IEEE	or a version like IEEE

23	103	22	On Page 7	One Page 7

24	106	2	with the current numbers in the OSHA

	with the correct numbers in that OSHA

CORRECTION NUMBER	PAGE	LINE	CORRECTED

LANGUAGE	ORIGINAL

LANGUAGE

25	112	5	documentation of field measured	documentation of Rule measured

26	113	15	period and to the extent

	period into the extent

27	114	4	those steps	those step

28	116	4-5	outages for performing maintenance based on insulator length. outages for perform maintenance based on insulator life.

29	116	21	different than the proposal?	different in the proposal?

30	119	11	questions	question

31	160	21	IBEW Testimony”	IBEW Testimony

32	161	8	most of the rulemaking

	most of the ruling

33	162	16	no safety problems identified with

	no safety problems identified in

34	177	13	ask them to	ask to them to

35	195	22	second date to	second date of

 PAGE

 PAGE   3


[Federal Register: February 3, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 23)]
[Notices]
[Page 5823-5824]
[DOCID:fr03fe06-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EC06-67-000]

Quachita Power, LLC; Notice of Filing

January 26, 2006.
    Take notice that on January 18, 2006, Quachita Power, LLC
(Applicant)

submitted an application pursuant to section 203 of the Federal Power
Act for authorization for the disposition of jurisdictional facilities
related to the transfer of a 50% direct non-managing membership
interest to Cogentrix Ouachita Holdings, Inc. (Holdings). As a result
of the proposed transfer, Applicant states it will be a wholly-owned
direct subsidiary of Holdings, which is a wholly-owned indirect
subsidiary of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Applicant further states it
is an exempt wholesale generator that owns and operates an 816 MW
electric generating facility located in Ouachita Parish near the City
of Sterlington, Louisiana. Applicant has requested confidential
treatment for Exhibit I, because it contains sensitive commercial and
financial information that is not publicly available.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant. On or before the comment date, it is
not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons
other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 8, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-1449 Filed 2-2-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 235 (Friday, December 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 70494]
[FR Doc No: 2021-26825]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8925-01-OMS]

Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision
Approval, Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) approval of the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE)
request to revise/modify certain of its EPA-authorized programs to
allow electronic reporting.

DATES: EPA approves the authorized program revisions/modifications as
of December 10, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shirley M. Miller, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Information Management, Mail Stop 2824T,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media
Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal
Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR.
CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory
alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure
that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper
counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local
government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving,
electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to
EPA for a revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA
approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on
consideration of the electronic document receiving systems that the
state, tribe, or local government will use to implement the electronic
reporting. Additionally, Sec.  3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3,
subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and
modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option
of the state, tribe or local government in place of procedures
available under existing program-specific authorization regulations. An
application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the
state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to
implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered
by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems
that meet the applicable subpart D requirements.
    On June 24, 2021, the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE)
submitted an application titled Industrial Pretreatment Program for
revisions/modifications to its EPA-approved programs under title 40 CFR
to allow new electronic reporting. EPA reviewed MDE's request to
revise/modify its EPA-authorized programs and, based on this review,
EPA determined that the application met the standards for approval of
authorized program revisions/modifications set out in 40 CFR part 3,
subpart D. In accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of EPA's
decision to approve MDE's request to revise/modify its following EPA-
authorized programs to allow electronic reporting under 40 CFR is being
published in the Federal Register: Part 142: National Primary Drinking
Water Regulations Implementation (NPDWR) reporting under CFR 141 MDE
was notified of EPA's determination to approve its application with
respect to the authorized programs listed above.

    Dated: December 7, 2021.
Jennifer Campbell,
Director, Office of Information Management.
[FR Doc. 2021-26825 Filed 12-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42572-42573]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16932]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-69956; File No. SR-CME-2013-09]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Regarding Interest Rate Swap Clearing Changes

July 10, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 28, 2013, Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (``CME'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule change described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have
been prepared primarily by CME. CME filed the proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(4)(ii)
\4\ thereunder, so that the proposal was effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(4)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    CME is filing proposed rules changes that are limited to its
business as a derivatives clearing organization offering interest rate
swap (``IRS'') clearing services. More specifically, the proposed rule
changes that are the subject of this filing would facilitate the
addition of new IRS products for clearing and would also include
certain changes to its existing IRS clearing offering.
    The text of the proposed rule changes is also available at the
CME's Web site at http://www.cmegroup.com, at the principal office of
CME, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose and basis for the proposed
rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule
change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places
specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    CME is registered as a derivatives clearing organization with the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission and currently offers clearing
services for interest rate swaps (``IRS''). With this filing, CME
proposes to accept the following swaps for clearing beginning July 1,
2013:
     Fixed-Floating IRS denominated in Hong Kong Dollar
(``HKD''), New Zealand Dollar (``NZD'') and Singapore Dollar (``SGD'')
with Termination Dates up to 15 years.

Additionally, CME will amend CME Rules 90002.F and 90102.E to add the
following swap specifications to its existing offering of IRS:
     OIS swaps with Termination Dates up to 30 years;
     Variable notional amounts (amortizing, roller coaster and
accreting) for fixed-floating and basis swaps;
     Swaps with straight and spread compounding; and
     New Zealand as an acceptable calendar adjustment for
Business Day Conventions.
    The changes to CME Rule 90002.F reflect the addition of variable
notional amounts. The changes to CME Rule 90102.E reflect the addition
of certain Floating Rate Options for HKD, NZD and SGD swaps and certain
addition OIS rates. The Manual of Operations for CME Cleared Interest
Rate Swaps (the ``IRS Manual'') is also being updated in connection
with these proposed changes described in this filing.
    The changes that are described in this filing are limited to CME's
IRS clearing offering and do not materially impact CME's credit default
swap clearing

business in any way. CME notes that it has also submitted the proposed
rule changes that are the subject of this filing to its primary
regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC''), in CME
Submission 13-164.
    CME believes the proposed rule changes are consistent with the
requirements of the Exchange Act including Section 17A of the Exchange
Act. The proposed rule changes involve enhancements to CME's interest
rate swap product offering for investors, including new products for
clearing, and as such are designed to promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities transactions and derivatives
agreements, contracts and transactions, and to assure the safeguarding
of securities and funds which are in the custody or control of the
clearing agency and, in general, help to protect investors and the
public interest. Furthermore, the proposed changes are limited to
listing new IRS for clearing and making changes to CME's existing IRS
clearing offering. IRS is under the exclusive jurisdiction of the CFTC.
As such, the proposed CME changes are limited to CME's activities as a
derivatives clearing organization clearing swaps that are not security-
based swaps; CME notes that the policies of the CFTC with respect to
administering the Commodity Exchange Act are comparable to a number of
the policies underlying the Exchange Act, such as promoting market
transparency for over-the-counter derivatives markets, promoting the
prompt and accurate clearance of transactions and protecting investors
and the public interest. In summary, the proposed CME changes do not
significantly affect the security-based swap clearing operations of CME
or any related rights or obligations of CME security-based swap
clearing participants. The changes are therefore consistent with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Exchange and are properly filed
under Section 19(b)(3)(A) and Rule 19b-4(f)(4)(ii) thereunder.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CME does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any
impact, or impose any burden, on competition. The rule changes simply
add new types of interest rates swaps to the CME rulebook and make
certain other additions to the existing swap certifications in the CME
Rulebook.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    CME has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, comments
regarding this proposed rule change. CME has not received any
unsolicited written comments from interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has been filed pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) \5\ of the Act and paragraph (f)(4)(ii) of Rule 19b-4 \6\
thereunder and will become effective on filing. At any time within 60
days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Supra note 3.
    \6\ Supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml) or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CME-2013-09 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CME-2013-09. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of CME and on CME's
Web site (http://www.cmegroup.com/market-regulation/files/sec_19b-4_13-09.pdf).
    All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CME-2013-09
and should be submitted on or before August 6, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-16932 Filed 7-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 203 (Monday, October 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58908-58910]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23190]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2021-0146; FRL-8682-05-OCSPP]

Certain New Chemicals or Significant New Uses; Statements of
Findings for August 2021

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires EPA to
publish in the Federal Register a statement of its findings after its
review of certain TSCA

notices when EPA makes a finding that a new chemical substance or
significant new use is not likely to present an unreasonable risk of
injury to health or the environment. Such statements apply to
premanufacture notices (PMNs), microbial commercial activity notices
(MCANs), and significant new use notices (SNUNs) submitted to EPA under
TSCA. This document presents statements of findings made by EPA on such
submissions during the period from August 1, 2021 to August 31, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact:
Rebecca Edelstein, Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 202-
564-1667 email address: [email protected].
    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. As such, the
Agency has not attempted to describe the specific entities that this
action may apply to. Although others may be affected, this action
applies directly to the submitters of the PMNs addressed in this
action.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The docket for this action, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2021-0146, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics
Docket (OPPT Docket), Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center
(EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202) 566-
0280.
    Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. What action is the Agency taking?

    This document lists the statements of findings made by EPA after
review of notices submitted under TSCA section 5(a) that certain new
chemical substances or significant new uses are not likely to present
an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment. This
document presents statements of findings made by EPA during the period
from August 1, 2021 to August 31, 2021.

III. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?

    TSCA section 5(a)(3) requires EPA to review a TSCA section 5(a)
notice and make one of the following specific findings:
     The chemical substance or significant new use presents an
unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment;
     The information available to EPA is insufficient to permit
a reasoned evaluation of the health and environmental effects of the
chemical substance or significant new use;
     The information available to EPA is insufficient to permit
a reasoned evaluation of the health and environmental effects and the
chemical substance or significant new use may present an unreasonable
risk of injury to health or the environment;
     The chemical substance is or will be produced in
substantial quantities, and such substance either enters or may
reasonably be anticipated to enter the environment in substantial
quantities or there is or may be significant or substantial human
exposure to the substance; or
     The chemical substance or significant new use is not
likely to present an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the
environment.
    Unreasonable risk findings must be made without consideration of
costs or other non-risk factors, including an unreasonable risk to a
potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulation identified as relevant
under the conditions of use. The term ``conditions of use'' is defined
in TSCA section 3 to mean ``the circumstances, as determined by the
Administrator, under which a chemical substance is intended, known, or
reasonably foreseen to be manufactured, processed, distributed in
commerce, used, or disposed of.''
    EPA is required under TSCA section 5(g) to publish in the Federal
Register a statement of its findings after its review of a TSCA section
5(a) notice when EPA makes a finding that a new chemical substance or
significant new use is not likely to present an unreasonable risk of
injury to health or the environment. Such statements apply to PMNs,
MCANs, and SNUNs submitted to EPA under TSCA section 5.
    Anyone who plans to manufacture (which includes import) a new
chemical substance for a non-exempt commercial purpose and any
manufacturer or processor wishing to engage in a use of a chemical
substance designated by EPA as a significant new use must submit a
notice to EPA at least 90 days before commencing manufacture of the new
chemical substance or before engaging in the significant new use.
    The submitter of a notice to EPA for which EPA has made a finding
of ``not likely to present an unreasonable risk of injury to health or
the environment'' may commence manufacture of the chemical substance or
manufacture or processing for the significant new use notwithstanding
any remaining portion of the applicable review period.

IV. Statements of Administrator Findings Under TSCA Section 5(a)(3)(C)

    In this unit, EPA provides the following information (to the extent
that such information is not claimed as Confidential Business
Information (CBI)) on the PMNs, MCANs and SNUNs for which, during this
period, EPA has made findings under TSCA section 5(a)(3)(C) that the
new chemical substances or significant new uses are not likely to
present an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment:
     EPA case number assigned to the TSCA section 5(a) notice.
     Chemical identity (generic name if the specific name is
claimed as CBI).
     website link to EPA's decision document describing the
basis of the ``not likely to present an unreasonable risk'' finding
made by EPA under TSCA section 5(a)(3)(C).

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         EPA Case No.           Chemical identity       Website link
------------------------------------------------------------------------
P-20-0148,....................  Hydroxyalkanoic    https://www.epa.gov/
P-20-0149,....................   acid, salt,        system/files/
P-20-0150,....................   oxidized           documents/2021-09/p-
P-20-0151.....................   (Generic Name).    20-0148-
                                                    0151_determination_n
                                                    on-cbi_final_0.pdf.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.

    Dated: October 19, 2021.
Madison Le,
Director, New Chemicals Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2021-23190 Filed 10-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 213 (Monday, November 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66101-66103]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26319]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2011-0063; Notice 2]

Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, on behalf of Jaguar Cars
Limited, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Grant of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, on behalf of Jaguar Cars
Limited (collectively referred to as ``Jaguar'') has determined that
model year 2010 and certain 2011 Jaguar XJ passenger cars manufactured
between September 11, 2009 and March 28, 2011, do not fully comply with
paragraphs S5.2.1 and S5.5.2 of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 101, Controls and displays, regarding brake system-related
telltales. Jaguar has filed an appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR
Part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports, dated
April 15, 2011.

ADDRESSES: For further information on this decision contact Mr. Stuart
Seigel, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Jaguar's Petition

    Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and the rule
implementing those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556, Jaguar has petitioned
for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49
U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
    Notice of receipt of the petition was published, with a 30-day
public comment period, on August 26, 2011 in the Federal Register (76
FR 53532). No comments were received. To view the petition, and all
supporting documents log onto the Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at: http://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online
search instructions to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2011-0063.''

II. Vehicles Involved

    Affected are approximately 8,621 model year 2010 and 2011 Jaguar XJ
passenger cars that were manufactured at Jaguar's Castle Bromwich
assembly plant between September 11, 2009 and March 28, 2011.

III. Rule Text

    Paragraphs S5.2.1 and S5.5.2 of FMVSS No. 101 specifically state:

    S5.2.1 Except for the Low Tire Pressure Telltale, each control,
telltale and indicator that is listed in column 1 of Table 1 or
Table 2 must be identified by the symbol specified for it in column
2 or the word or abbreviation specified for it in column 3 of Table
1 or Table 2. If a symbol is used, each symbol provided pursuant to
this paragraph must be substantially similar in form to the symbol
as it appears in Table 1 or Table 2. If a symbol is used, each
symbol provided pursuant to this paragraph must have the
proportional dimensional characteristics of the symbol as it appears
in Table 1 or Table . . .
    S5.5.2 The telltales for any brake system malfunction required
by Table 1 to be red, air bag malfunction, low tire pressure,
electronic stability control malfunction (as of September 1, 2011),
passenger air bag off, high beam, turn signal, and seat belt must
not be shown in the same common space.

Additionally, Table 1 Note 9 states:

    Refer to FMVSS 105 or FMVSS 135, as appropriate, for additional
specific requirements for brake telltale labeling and color. If a
single telltale is to be used to indicate more than one brake system
condition, the brake system malfunction identifier must be used.

FMVSS No. 135 is applicable to the subject vehicles. Section 5.5.5,
Labeling, states in pertinent part:

    S5.5.5. Labeling.
    (a) Each visual indicator shall display a word or words in
accordance with the requirements of Standard No. 101 (49 CFR
571.101) and this section, which shall be legible to the driver
under all daytime and nighttime conditions when activated. Unless
otherwise specified, the words shall have letters not less than 3.2
mm (\1/8\ inch) high and the letters and background shall be of
contrasting colors, one of which is red.

Words or symbols in addition to those required by Standard No. 101
and this section may be provided for purposes of clarity.
    (d) If separate indicators are used for one or more of the
conditions described in S5.5.1(a) through S5.5.1(g), the indicators
shall display the following wording:
    (1) If a separate indicator is provided for the low brake fluid
condition in S5.5.1(a)(1), the words ``Brake Fluid'' (emphasis
added) shall be used except for vehicles using hydraulic system
mineral oil.
    (2) If a separate indicator is provided for the gross loss of
pressure condition in S5.5.1(a)(2), the words ``Brake Pressure''
(emphasis added) shall be used.
    (3) If a separate indicator is provided for the condition
specified in S5.5.1(b), the letters and background shall be of
contrasting colors, one of which is yellow. The indicator shall be
labeled with the words ``Antilock'' or ``Anti-lock'' or ``ABS'';
(emphasis added) or ``Brake Proportioning,'' in accordance with
Table 2 of Standard No. 101.
    (4) If a separate indicator is provided for application of the
parking brake as specified for S5.5.1(c), the single word ``Park''
(emphasis added) or the words ``Parking Brake'' (emphasis added) may
be used.

IV. Summary of Jaguar's Analyses

    Jaguar explains that the noncompliance for the 8,621 XJ vehicles is
that the telltales used for brake warning, park brake warning and
Antilock Braking System (ABS) failure warnings are displayed using
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) symbols instead of
the telltale symbols required by FMVSS No. 101.
    Jaguar stated its belief that although the instrument cluster
telltales are marked with ISO symbols, the noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety for the following reasons:
    (1) The functionality of all primary braking systems is not
affected by this noncompliance and the vehicle will operate as
intended.
    (2) The owner's manual shows clearly the ISO warning symbols that
may be displayed along with the FMVSS No. 101 compliant equivalents.
Further, the owner's manual instructions on required actions to take in
the event of a warning being displayed are the same for each telltale
regardless of it being marked with an ISO symbol or with its FMVSS No.
101 compliant equivalent.
    (3) The colors of the telltales adhere to a common color scheme and
are consistent between ISO and FMVSS requirements. The owner's manual
provides the following guidance to the driver:
    a. RED warning lamps are for primary warnings. A primary warning
must be investigated immediately by the driver or seek qualified
assistance as soon as possible.
    b. AMBER warning lamps are for secondary warnings. Some indicate
that a vehicle system is in operation, others indicate that the driver
must take action and then seek qualified assistance as soon as
possible.
    (4) The driver will receive ISO symbol based warnings of any
affected system malfunction. These warnings, although displaying
telltales marked with ISO symbols, are augmented with a message center
text providing further details as to the nature of the warning symbol:
    a. If low brake fluid is detected or an Electronic Brakeforce
Distribution (EBD) fault identified, the ISO Brake Warning Symbol and
the words ``Brake Fluid Low'' or ``EBD Fault'' will be displayed in the
message center.
    b. If the park brake is applied, the ISO Parking Brake symbol will
be displayed. If the vehicle is moving in excess of 1.8 mph, the
message displayed in the message center is ``Caution! Park Brake
Applied'' and a continuous chime will sound.
    c. If an antilock brake system (ABS) malfunction is detected, the
ISO ABS symbol illuminates display a message in the message center
stating ``ABS Fault''.
    (5) Jaguar is not aware of any incidents or injuries related to
this condition.
    Jaguar also explains that all unsold vehicles in the dealer stock
will have the instrument cluster software configuration file settings
updated to display the correct warning telltales as required by FMVSS
No. 101 prior to sale.
    In summation, Jaguar believes that the described noncompliance of
its vehicles to be inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that
its petition, to exempt Jaguar from providing recall notification of
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.

V. NHTSA'S Analyses

    Since these vehicles are equipped with a split service brake
system, a low brake fluid condition will potentially reduce the ability
of the brakes on two of the four wheels to stop it. When this condition
occurs in Jaguar's affected vehicles, the telltale labeled with the ISO
brake symbol, which resembles a brake assembly but has no words, is
displayed. In addition, in the message center, ``Brake Fluid Low'' is
displayed. Likewise, Jaguar's ISO Park brake applied symbol (P) is
accompanied by a message ``Caution! Park Brake Applied'' and a chime.
Regarding the ``ABS'' telltale, the agency has learned that Jaguar
labeled the ``ABS'' telltale as required by FMVSS Nos. 101 and 135,
with letters 3.2 mm high. Therefore, Jaguar incorrectly identified this
telltale in its Part 573 report, and this portion of its petition is
moot.
    Jaguar notified NHTSA that, as of September 19, 2013, they had
corrected 95 percent of the noncompliant vehicles by its Field Service
Action (FSA). Jaguar also agreed to address the remaining vehicles as
part of a supplemental customer notification satisfaction campaign
(CNSC) and to continue to notify NHTSA of its progress. While NHTSA
believes \1\ that telltales labeled ``BRAKE FLUID'' and ``PARK BRAKE''
or ``PARK'' are more readily identified by drivers than an ISO brake
symbol, the motor vehicle safety impact of the noncompliances on the
remaining uncorrected vehicles is mitigated due to the unique set of
indicators available to operators of the subject vehicles as well as
Jaguar's ongoing CNSC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 60 FR 6414, February 2, 1995 and 70 FR 48295, August 17,
2005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NHTSA has also not received any consumer complaints on issues
related to the subject noncompliances.

VI. NHTSA Decision

    In consideration of Jaguar's actions and intent to remedy all
vehicles, NHTSA has determined that Jaguar has met its burden of
persuasion that the FMVSS No. 101 and 135 noncompliances of the subject
vehicles, i.e. labeling of the brake system malfunction and park brake
applied telltales, are inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, Jaguar's petition is hereby granted.
    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this decision
only applies to the vehicles that Jaguar no longer controlled at the
time that it determined that a noncompliance existed in the subject
vehicles. However, the granting of this petition does not relieve
vehicle distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer
for sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after Jaguar
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.

    Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
CFR 1.95 and 501.8)

    Issued On: October 29, 2013.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2013-26319 Filed 11-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 149 (Thursday, August 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47807-47809]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16660]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-95393; File No. SR-ISE-2022-13]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Order Granting
Approval of a Proposed Rule Change To Permit the Listing and Trading of
P.M.-Settled Nasdaq-100 Index Options That Expire on Tuesday or
Thursday Under Its Nonstandard Expirations Pilot Program

July 29, 2022.

I. Introduction

    On June 1, 2022, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or the Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to add P.M.-
settled Nasdaq-100 Index (``NDX'') options that expire on Tuesday or
Thursday to the Exchange's Nonstandard Expirations Pilot Program
(``Pilot Program''). The proposed rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on June 21, 2022.\3\ No comments were received.
The Commission is approving the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95101 (June 14,
2022), 87 FR 36894 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    The Exchange proposes to amend Supplementary Material .07 to
Options 4A, Section 12, which governs its Pilot Program, to permit
P.M.-settled Nasdaq-100 Index (``NDXP'') options that expire on Tuesday
or Thursday. Under the existing Pilot Program, the Exchange is
permitted to list P.M.-settled options on broad-based indexes that
expire on: (1) any Monday, Wednesday, or Friday (``Weekly
Expirations'') and (2) the last trading day of the month (``End of
Month Expirations'' or ``EOMs'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Supplementary Material .07 to Options 4A, Section 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, the proposed rule change amends Supplementary
Material .07(a) Options 4A, Section 12 to add NDXP options (P.M.-
settled) that expire on Tuesday or Thursday (``Tuesday and Thursday
NDXP Expirations'') as permissible Weekly Expirations under the Pilot
Program (currently set to expire on November 4, 2022).\5\ The Exchange
notes that permitting Tuesday and Thursday NDXP Expirations, as
proposed, is in addition to the NDXP options with Monday, Wednesday and
Friday expirations that the Exchange may (and does) already list
pursuant to Supplementary Material .07(a) to Options 4A, Section 12.\6\
The Pilot Program for Weekly Expirations will apply to Tuesday and
Thursday NDXP Expirations in the same manner as it currently applies to
P.M.-settled broad-based index options with Monday, Wednesday and
Friday expirations.\7\ As proposed, Supplementary Material .07(a) to
Options 4A, Section 12 provides that the Exchange may open for trading
Weekly Expirations on NDX options to expire on any Tuesday or Thursday
(other than days that coincide with the third Friday-of-the-month or an
EOM expiration).\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 36894.
    \6\ See id.
    \7\ See id.
    \8\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed weekly Tuesday and Thursday NDXP Expirations will be
subject to all provisions of Supplementary Material .07(a) to Options
4A, Section 12 in the same manner as existing Monday, Wednesday, and
Friday expirations.\9\ The maximum number of expirations that may be
listed for each Weekly Expiration (i.e., a Monday expiration, Tuesday
expiration, Wednesday expiration, Thursday expiration, or Friday
expiration, as applicable) in a given class is the same as the maximum
number of expirations permitted in Options 4A, Section 12(a)(3) for
standard options on the same broad-based index (which is 12 for NDXP
options).\10\ Further, other expirations in the same class are not
counted as part of the maximum number of Weekly Expirations for an
applicable broad-based index class.\11\ Weekly Expirations need not be
for consecutive Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday
expirations as applicable; however, the expiration date of a non-
consecutive expiration may not be beyond what would be considered the
last expiration date if the maximum number of expirations were listed
consecutively.\12\ Weekly Expirations that are initially listed in a
given class may expire up to four weeks from the actual listing
date.\13\ Additionally, the Tuesday and Thursday NDXP Expirations will
be treated the same as options on the same underlying index that expire
on the third Friday of the expiration month, except that they will be
P.M.-settled and new series in Weekly Expirations may be added up to
and including on the expiration date for an expiring Weekly
Expiration.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See id.
    \10\ See proposed Supplementary Material .07(a) to Options 4A,
Section 12. See also Notice, supra note 3, at 36895.
    \11\ See proposed Supplementary Material .07(a) to Options 4A,
Section 12.
    \12\ See id.
    \13\ See id.
    \14\ See also Notice, supra note 3, at 36894.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the Exchange is not open for business on a Tuesday or Thursday,
the normally Tuesday- or Thursday-expiring NDXP options will expire on
the previous business day.\15\ The proposed rule change also adds that,
if two different Weekly Expirations on NDX would expire on the same day
because the Exchange is not open for business on a certain weekday, the
Exchange will list only one of such

Weekly Expirations.\16\ Transactions in Weekly Expirations may be
effected on the Exchange between the hours of 9:30 a.m. (Eastern Time)
and 4:15 p.m. (Eastern Time), except that on the last trading day,
transactions in expiring Weekly Expirations may be effected on the
Exchange between the hours of 9:30 a.m. (Eastern time) and 4:00 p.m.
(Eastern time).\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See id. at 36895.
    \16\ See id. The Exchange believes it is appropriate to clarify
in the rule text that the Exchange will list just one Weekly
Expiration in such a case, as the two Weekly Expirations would
essentially be the same options contract. Id.
    \17\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pilot Report
    The Exchange proposes to abide by the same reporting requirements
for the trading of Tuesday and Thursday NDXP Expirations that it does
for the trading of P.M.-settled options on broad-based indexes that
expire on any Monday, Wednesday, or Friday pursuant to the Pilot
Program.\18\ The Exchange represented that it will continue to provide
the Commission with ongoing data regarding Tuesday and Thursday NDXP
Expirations unless and until the Nonstandard Pilot is made permanent or
discontinued.\19\ As provided in the Pilot Program Approval Order,\20\
the annual report will contain an analysis of volume, open interest and
trading patterns. In addition, for series that exceed certain minimum
open interest parameters, the annual report will provide analysis of
index price volatility and, if needed, share trading activity.\21\
Additionally, the Exchange will provide the Commission with any
additional data or analyses the Commission requests because it deems
such data or analyses necessary to determine whether the Pilot Program,
including Tuesday and Thursday NDXP Expirations as proposed, is
consistent with the Exchange Act.\22\ As it does for current Pilot
Program products, the Exchange will make public on its website all data
and analyses in connection with Tuesday and Thursday NDXP Expirations
it submits to the Commission under the Pilot Program.\23\ Going
forward, the Exchange states that it will include the same areas of
analysis for Tuesday and Thursday NDXP Expirations.\24\ The Exchange
also proposes to include the following market quality data, over sample
periods determined by the Exchange and the Commission, for NDXP options
(NDXP and standard NDX options) as part of the annual reports going
forward: (1) time-weighted relative quoted spreads; (2) relative
effective spreads; and (3) time-weighted bid and offer sizes.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See id.
    \19\ See id.
    \20\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82612 (February 1,
2018), 83 FR 5470 (February 7, 2018) (approving SR-ISE-2017-111)
(Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Establish a Nonstandard
Expirations Pilot Program).
    \21\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 36895.
    \22\ See id.
    \23\ See id.
    \24\ See id.
    \25\ See id. at 36895-96.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Implementation
    The Exchange proposes to implement this rule change on or before
August 1, 2022. The Exchange will issue an Options Trader Alert to
notify members and member organizations of the implementation date.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See id. at 36896.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange
and, in particular, with Section 6(b) of the Act.\27\ In particular,
the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, \28\ which requires, among other things,
that a national securities exchange have rules designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). In approving this proposed rule change,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
    \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As the Commission noted in its recent order approving the listing
and trading of P.M.-settled options on the S&P 500 Index that expire on
Tuesday or Thursday, the Commission has had concerns about the
potential adverse effects and impact of P.M. settlement upon market
volatility and the operation of fair and orderly markets on the
underlying cash markets at or near the close of trading, including for
cash-settled derivatives contracts based on a broad-based index.\29\
The potential impact today remains unclear, given the significant
changes in the closing procedures of the primary markets in recent
decades. The Commission is mindful of the historical experience with
the impact of P.M. settlement of cash-settled index derivatives on the
underlying cash markets, but recognizes that these risks may be
mitigated today by the enhanced closing procedures that are now in use
at the primary equity markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94682 (April 12,
2022), 87 FR 22993 (April 18, 2022) (CBOE-2022-005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposal to add Tuesday and Thursday NDXP
Expirations to the existing Pilot Program would offer additional
investment options to investors and may be useful for their investment
or hedging objectives while providing the Commission with data to
monitor the effects of Tuesday and Thursday NDXP Expirations and the
impact of P.M. settlement on the markets. To assist the Commission in
assessing any potential impact of Tuesday and Thursday NDXP Expirations
on the options markets as well as the underlying cash equities markets,
the Exchange will be required to submit data to the Commission in
connection with the Pilot Program.\30\ Further, including the proposed
Tuesday and Thursday NDXP Expirations in the Pilot Program, together
with the data and analysis that the Exchange will provide to the
Commission, will allow the Exchange and the Commission to monitor for
and assess any potential for adverse market effects of allowing Tuesday
and Thursday NDXP Expirations, including on the underlying component
stocks. In particular, the data collected from the Pilot Program will
help inform the Commission's consideration of whether the Pilot
Program, as amended to include Tuesday and Thursday NDXP Expirations,
should be modified, discontinued, extended, or permanently approved.
Furthermore, the Exchange's ongoing analysis of the Pilot Program
should help it monitor any potential risks from large P.M.-settled
positions and take appropriate action if warranted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 36895-96.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the foregoing reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Ac t.

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\31\ that the proposed rule change (SR-ISE-2022-13), be, and hereby
is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-16660 Filed 8-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 199 (Friday, October 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 63964]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26797]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Wednesday,
October 19, 2011 at 10 a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday,
October 19, 2011 will be:

    Institution of administrative proceedings; and other matters
relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 12, 2011.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-26797 Filed 10-12-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 9, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62163-62165]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24479]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP14-517-001]

Golden Pass LNG Terminal LLC, Golden Pass Products LLC; Notice of
Amendment of Authorizations and Establishing Intervention Deadline

    Take notice that on February 25, 2021 and May 19, 2021, Golden Pass
Products LLC, (Golden Pass LNG), 811 Louisiana Street Suite 1400,
Houston, TX 77002, filed its Golden Pass LNG Export Project Variance
Request No. 15 (Variance No. 15).\1\ On June 3, 2021, Golden Pass LNG
received a data request regarding the information provided in Variance
Request No. 15, responding on June 8 with all of the information
requested. Variance No. 15 describes Golden Pass LNG's identified need
for traffic volume and work week/hour limits in excess of what was
originally authorized under Section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for
construction of the Golden Pass LNG Export Project Docket No. CP14-517-
001 which the Commission authorized on December 21, 2016.\2\ If
authorized, Variance No. 15 which would modify their original
authorizations to such an extent that it is appropriate to treat these
plans as amendments to the Section 3 approvals for issued for the
projects. The plan and subsequent filings are on file with the
Commission and open for public inspection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ We note that in the February 25, 2021, May 19, 2021 and June
8, 2021 filings references were made to Golden Pass LNG Terminal LLC
holding the Section 3 authorization for the LNG Terminal.
    \2\ In 2016, the Commission authorized Golden Pass Products, LLC
to site, construct, and operate facilities for the export of LNG
under section 3 of the NGA. Specifically, the 2016 Authorization
Order authorized the construction and operation of three
liquefaction trains with a total LNG production capacity of 15.6
mtpa, plus feed gas treatment facilities consisting of a mercury
removal system, amine system, and heavy hydrocarbon removal system.
These facilities, known as the Golden Pass Export Terminal Project,
will be constructed adjacent to and integrated with the existing
Golden Pass Terminal in Sabine Pass, Texas. Golden Pass LNG has
commenced construction of the Golden Pass Export Terminal Project
facilities and anticipates commencing service in 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions regarding the proposed project should be directed to
Kevin M. Sweeney, Legal Counsel, Golden Pass Products, LLC, Law Office
of Kevin M. Sweeney 1625 K Street NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20006,
or by phone at

202-609-7709, or email at [email protected].
    Golden Pass LNG is directed to provide this notice to all affected
landowners and towns, communities, and local, state, and federal
governments and agencies involved in the project within 10 business
days of its publication in the Federal Register.
    Pursuant to Section 157.9 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure,\3\ within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will
either: Complete its environmental review and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or environmental
assessment (EA) for this proposal. The filing of an EA in the
Commission's public record for this proceeding or the issuance of a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to notify
federal and state agencies of the timing for the completion of all
necessary reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal
authorizations within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission
staff's FEIS or EA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 18 CFR 157.9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Participation

    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
the companies' proposals: You can file comments on the proposals, and
you can file a motion to intervene in the proceeding. There is no fee
or cost for filing comments or intervening. The deadline for filing a
motion to intervene is 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time November 24, 2021.

Comments

    Any person wishing to comment on the proposals may do so. Comments
may include statements of support or objections to the proposals as a
whole or specific aspects of the proposal. The more specific your
comments, the more useful they will be. To ensure that your comments
are timely and properly recorded, please submit your comments on or
before November 24, 2021.
    There are three methods you can use to submit your comments to the
Commission. In all instances, please reference the Project docket
number CP14-517-001 in your submission. Identify your comments
separately with regard to one or more of these proposals.
    (1) You may file your comments electronically by using the eComment
feature, which is located on the Commission's website at www.ferc.gov
under the link to Documents and Filings. Using eComment is an easy
method for interested persons to submit brief, text-only comments on a
project.
    (2) You may file your comments electronically by using the eFiling
feature, which is located on the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov)
under the link to Documents and Filings. With eFiling, you can provide
comments in a variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your
submission. New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking
on ``eRegister.'' You will be asked to select the type of filing you
are making; first select ``General'' and then select ``Comment on a
Filing''; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the following address below. Your written comments must reference the
Project docket CP14-517-001.
    To mail via USPS, use the following address: Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426.
    To mail via any other courier, use the following address: Kimberly
D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins
Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    The Commission encourages electronic filing of comments (options 1
and 2 above) and has eFiling staff available to assist you at (202)
502-8258 or [email protected]
    Persons who comment on the environmental review of this project,
and provide their mailing address, will be placed on the Commission's
environmental mailing list, and will receive notification when the
environmental documents (EA or EIS) are issued for this project and
will be notified of meetings associated with the Commission's
environmental review process.
    The Commission considers all comments received about the project in
determining the appropriate action to be taken. However, the filing of
a comment alone will not serve to make the filer a party to the
proceeding. To become a party, you must intervene in the proceeding.
For instructions on how to intervene, see below.

Interventions

    All intervenors in the previous proceedings for the projects CP14-
517-001, will be considered intervenors in this amendment proceeding
and do not need to file a new motion to intervene.
    Any other person, which includes individuals, organizations,
businesses, municipalities, and other entities,\4\ has the option to
file a motion to intervene in this proceeding. Only intervenors have
the right to request rehearing of Commission orders issued in this
proceeding and to subsequently challenge the Commission's orders in the
U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 18 CFR 385.102(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To intervene, you must submit a motion to intervene to the
Commission in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure \5\ and the regulations under the NGA \6\ by the
intervention deadline for the project, which is November 24, 2021. As
described further in Rule 214, your motion to intervene must state, to
the extent known, your position regarding the proceeding, as well as
your interest in the proceeding. [For an individual, this could include
your status as a landowner, ratepayer, resident of an impacted
community, or recreationist. You do not need to have property directly
impacted by the project in order to intervene.] For more information
about motions to intervene, refer to the FERC website at https://www.ferc.gov/resources/guides/how-to/intervene.asp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 18 CFR 385.214.
    \6\ 18 CFR 157.10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There are two ways to submit your motion to intervene. In both
instances, please reference the Project docket number CP14-517-001 in
your submission.
    (1) You may file your motion to intervene by using the Commission's
eFiling feature, which is located on the Commission's website
(www.ferc.gov) under the link to Documents and Filings. New eFiling
users must first create an account by clicking on ``eRegister.'' You
will be asked to select the type of filing you are making; first select
``General'' and then select ``Intervention.'' The eFiling feature
includes a document-less intervention option; for more information,
visit https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/document-less-intervention.pdf; or
    (2) You can file a paper copy of your motion to intervene, along
with three copies, by mailing the documents to the address below. Your
motion to intervene must reference the Project docket number CP14-517-
001.
    To mail via USPS, use the following address: Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426.
    To mail via any other courier, use the following address: Kimberly
D. Bose,

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue,
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    The Commission encourages electronic filing of motions to intervene
(option 1 above) and has eFiling staff available to assist you at (202)
502-8258 or [email protected]
    Motions to intervene must be served on the applicant either by mail
or email at: Kevin M. Sweeney, Legal Counsel, Golden Pass Products,
LLC, Law Office of Kevin M. Sweeney, 1625 K Street NW, Suite 1100,
Washington, DC 20006, or by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email at
[email protected]. Any subsequent submissions by an intervenor
must be served on the applicant and all other parties to the
proceeding. Contact information for parties can be downloaded from the
service list at the eService link on FERC Online. Service can be via
email with a link to the document.
    All timely, unopposed \7\ motions to intervene are automatically
granted by operation of Rule 214(c)(1).\8\ Motions to intervene that
are filed after the intervention deadline are untimely and may be
denied. Any late-filed motion to intervene must show good cause for
being late and must explain why the time limitation should be waived
and provide justification by reference to factors set forth in Rule
214(d) of the Commission's Rules and Regulations.\9\ A person obtaining
party status will be placed on the service list maintained by the
Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies (paper or
electronic) of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other
parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The applicant has 15 days from the submittal of a motion to
intervene to file a written objection to the intervention.
    \8\ 18 CFR 385.214(c)(1).
    \9\ 18 CFR 385.214(b)(3) and (d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tracking the Proceeding

    Throughout the proceeding, additional information about the project
will be available from the Commission's Office of External Affairs, at
(866) 208-FERC, or on the FERC website at www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link as described above. The eLibrary link also provides
access to the texts of all formal documents issued by the Commission,
such as orders, notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. For more information and to register, go to
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.
    Intervention and Scoping Comments Deadline: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time
on November 24, 2021.

    Dated: November 3, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-24479 Filed 11-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 215 (Monday, November 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68829-68830]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28815]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket No. PHMSA-2011-0246; Notice No. 11-11]

International Standards on the Transport of Dangerous Goods;
Public Meeting

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is to advise interested persons that PHMSA will
conduct a public meeting in preparation for the 40th session of the
United Nations Sub-Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous
Goods (UNSCOE TDG) to be held November 28 to December 7, 2011, in
Geneva, Switzerland. During this meeting, PHMSA is also soliciting
comments relative to potential new work items which may be considered
for inclusion in its international agenda.
    Information Regarding the UNSCOE TDG Meeting:

DATES: Thursday, November 17, 2011; 1 p.m.-4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the DOT Headquarters, West
Building, Conference Rooms 8-10, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
    Registration: Pre-registration for this meeting is not required.
Participants are encouraged to arrive early to allow time for security
checks necessary to obtain access to the building.
    Conference Call Capability/Live Meeting Information: Conference
call-in and ``live meeting'' capability will be provided for this
meeting. Specific information on call-in and live meeting access will
be posted when available at http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/hazmat/regs/international.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Shane Kelley, Senior International
Transportation Specialist, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety,
Department of Transportation, Washington, DC 20590;<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The primary purpose of this meeting will be
to prepare for the 40th session of the UNSCOE TDG. The 40th session of
the UNSCOE TDG is the second of four meetings scheduled for the 2011-
2012 biennium. The UNSCOE will consider proposals for the 18th Revised
Edition of the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of
Dangerous Goods Model Regulations which will be implemented within
relevant domestic, regional, and international regulations from January
1, 2015. Copies of proposals and the meeting agenda may be obtained
from the United Nations Transport Division's Web site at: http://www.unece.org/trans/main/dgdb/dgsubc/c32011.html.
    General topics on the agenda for the UNSCOE TDG meeting include:
     Listing, classification and packing
     Electric storage systems
     Miscellaneous proposals of amendments to the Model
Regulations
     Electronic data interchange (EDI) for documentation
purposes
     Cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency
(IAEA)
     Global harmonization of transport of dangerous goods
regulations
     Guiding principles for the Model Regulations
     Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling
of Chemicals (GHS)
    In addition, PHMSA is soliciting comments on how to further enhance
harmonization for international transport of hazardous materials. PHMSA
has finalized a broad international strategic plan and

welcomes input on items which stakeholders believe should be included
as specific initiatives within this plan. PHMSA's Office of
International Standards Strategic Plan can be accessed at: http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/hazmat/regs/international.
    Following the 40th session of the UNSCOE TDG, PHMSA will place a
copy of the Sub-Committee's report and a summary of the results on
PHMSA's Hazardous Materials Safety Web site at http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/hazmat/regs/international. PHMSA's site at http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/hazmat/regs/international provides additional
information regarding the UNSCOE TDG and related matters such as
summaries of decisions taken at previous sessions of the UNSCOE TDG.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 2, 2011.
Magdy El-Sibaie,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety.
[FR Doc. 2011-28815 Filed 11-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P