[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 175 (Friday, September 9, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62378-62381]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21453]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R01-OAR-2015-0238; FRL-9951-94-Region 1]

Air Plan Approval; Connecticut; NOX Emission Trading
Orders as Single Source SIP Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of
Connecticut. This revision continues to allow facilities to create and/
or use emission credits using NOX Emission Trading and
Agreement Orders (TAOs) to comply with the NOX emission
limits required by Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies (RCSA)
section 22a-174-22 (Control of Nitrogen Oxides). The intended effect of
this action is to approve the individual trading orders to allow
facilities to determine the most cost-effective way to comply with the
state regulation. This action is being taken in accordance with the
Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: This final rule is effective on October 11, 2016.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R01-OAR-2015-0238. All documents in the docket are
listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available electronically
through http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Dahl, Air Permits, Toxics, and
Indoor Programs Unit, Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5
Post Office Square, Suite 100, (OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912, phone
number<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Summary of SIP Revision
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Summary of SIP Revision

    On November 15, 2011, the Connecticut Department of Energy and
Environmental Protection (CT DEEP) submitted a formal revision to its
State Implementation Plan (SIP). This SIP revision consists of eighty-
nine source-specific Trading Agreement and Orders (TAOs) that allow
twenty-four individual stationary sources of nitrogen oxide
(NOX) emissions to create and/or trade NOX
emission credits in order to ensure more effective compliance with EPA
SIP-approved state regulations for reducing NOX emissions.
We previously approved source-specific TAOs of the same kind issued by
CT DEEP under this program for these same sources on September 28, 1999
(64 FR 52233), March 23, 2001 (66 FR 16135), and September 9, 2013 (78
FR 54962). The November 15, 2011 SIP submittal also includes Consent
Order 8029A issued to Hamilton Sundstrand which addresses Volatile
Organic Compound (VOC) emissions.
    On June 15, 2016 (81 FR 38999) EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of Connecticut's 2011 SIP revision
submittal, proposing approval of the TAOs, except for Consent Order
8029A. The NPR also proposed approval of the revised TAO 8110A issued
to Yale University. This TAO was originally submitted as part of a July
1, 2004 SIP revision from Connecticut, and was modified by CT DEEP on
May 29, 2015.
    The rationale supporting EPA's proposed rulemaking action is
explained in the published NPR. The NPR is available in the docket for
this

rulemaking at www.regulations.gov, Docket ID Number EPA-R01-OAR-2015-
0238. EPA did not receive any public comments on the NPR.

II. Final Action

    The EPA is approving into the Connecticut SIP the 89 TAOs contained
in the State of Connecticut's 2011 SIP revision request as well as the
revised TAO 8110A for Yale University.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. Section 804, however, exempts from section 801 the
following types of rules: Rules of particular applicability; rules
relating to agency management or personnel; and Rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect
the rights or obligations of non-agency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3).
Because this is a rule of particular applicability, EPA is not required
to submit a rule report regarding this action under section 801.
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 8, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: August 17, 2016.
H. Curtis Spalding,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.

    Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart H--Connecticut

0
2. Section 52.377 is amended by adding paragraph (m)(2) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.377  Control Strategy: Ozone.

* * * * *
    (m) * * *
    (2) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection on
November 15, 2011 and July 1, 2004. The revisions consist of 90 single
source emission trading orders necessary for satisfying Reasonable
Available Control Technology requirements for nitrogen oxides during
specific time periods.
    (i) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8093C, Modification No. 2
issued to Pfizer in Groton.
    (ii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8093C, Modification No. 3
issued to Pfizer in Groton.
    (iii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8136A, Modification No. 1
issued to Pfizer in Groton.
    (iv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8136A, Modification No. 2
issued to Pfizer in Groton.
    (v) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8296 issued to Pfizer in
Groton.
    (vi) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8109, Modification No. 1
issued to Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation in Windsor Locks.
    (vii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8109, Modification No. 2
issued to Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation in Windsor Locks.
    (viii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8109, Modification No. 3
issued to Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation in Windsor Locks.
    (ix) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8291 issued to Hamilton
Sundstrand Corporation in Windsor Locks.
    (x) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8291, Modification No. 1 issued
to Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation in Windsor Locks.
    (xi) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8114A, Modification No. 1
issued to Cytec Industries, Inc. in Wallingford.
    (xii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8114A, Modification No. 2
issued to Cytec Industries, Inc. in Wallingford.
    (xiii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8115B, Modification No. 1
issued to University of Connecticut in Storrs.

    (xiv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8115B, Modification No. 2
issued to University of Connecticut in Storrs.
    (xv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8115B, Modification No. 3
issued to University of Connecticut in Storrs.
    (xvi) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8116B, Modification No. 1
issued to Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority in Hartford.
    (xvii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8116B, Modification No. 2
issued to Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority in Hartford.
    (xviii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8302 issued to Connecticut
Resources Recovery Authority in Hartford.
    (xix) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8119A, Modification No. 2
issued to City of Norwich, Department of Public Utilities in Norwich.
    (xx) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8119A, Modification No. 3
issued to City of Norwich, Department of Public Utilities in Norwich.
    (xxi) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8304 issued to City of
Norwich, Department of Public Utilities in Norwich.
    (xxii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8120A, Modification No. 1
issued to Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation in Stratford.
    (xxiii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8120A, Modification No. 2
issued to Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation in Stratford.
    (xxiv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8293 issued to Sikorsky
Aircraft Corporation in Stratford.
    (xxv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8293, Modification No. 1
issued to Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation in Stratford.
    (xxvi) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8123A, Modification No. 1
issued to Algonquin Gas Transmission Company in Cromwell.
    (xxvii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8123A, Modification No. 2
issued to Algonquin Gas Transmission Company in Cromwell.
    (xxviii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8134A, Modification No. 1
issued to United Technologies Corporation in East Hartford.
    (xxix) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8134A, Modification No. 2
issued to United Technologies Corporation in East Hartford.
    (xxx) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8289 issued to United
Technologies Corporation in East Hartford.
    (xxxi) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8154A, Modification No. 1
issued to Combustion Engineering, Inc. in Windsor.
    (xxxii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8154A, Modification No. 2
issued to Combustion Engineering, Inc. in Windsor.
    (xxxiii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8180A, Modification No. 2
issued to Connecticut Jet Power LLC in Branford, Greenwich, and
Torrington.
    (xxxiv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8180A, Modification No. 3
issued to Connecticut Jet Power LLC in Branford, Greenwich, and
Torrington.
    (xxxv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8181A, Modification No. 2
issued to Devon Power LLC in Milford.
    (xxxvi) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8181A, Modification No. 3
issued to Devon Power LLC in Milford.
    (xxxvii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8219A, Modification No. 2
issued to Devon Power LLC in Milford.
    (xxxviii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8251A, Modification No. 2
issued to Devon Power LLC in Milford.
    (xxxix) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8251A, Modification No. 3
issued to Devon Power LLC in Milford.
    (xl) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8182A, Modification No. 2
issued to Middleton Power LLC in Middleton.
    (xli) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8182A, Modification No. 3
issued to Middleton Power LLC in Middleton.
    (xlii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8213A, Modification No. 2
issued to Middleton Power LLC in Middleton.
    (xliii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8213A, Modification No. 3
issued to Middleton Power LLC in Middleton.
    (xliv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8214A, Modification No. 2
issued to Middleton Power LLC in Middleton.
    (xlv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8214A, Modification No. 3
issued to Middleton Power LLC in Middleton.
    (xlvi) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8215A, Modification No. 2
issued to Middleton Power LLC in Middleton.
    (xlvii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8215A, Modification No. 3
issued to Middleton Power LLC in Middleton.
    (xlviii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8183A, Modification No. 2
issued to Montville Power LLC in Montville.
    (xlix) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8183A, Modification No. 3
issued to Montville Power LLC in Montville.
    (l) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8216A, Modification No. 2
issued to Montville Power LLC in Montville.
    (li) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8216A, Modification No. 3
issued to Montville Power LLC in Montville.
    (lii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8217A, Modification No. 2
issued to Montville Power LLC in Montville.
    (liii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8217A, Modification No. 3
issued to Montville Power LLC in Montville.
    (liv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8184A, Modification No. 2
issued to Norwalk Power LLC in Norwalk.
    (lv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8184A, Modification No. 3
issued to Norwalk Power LLC in Norwalk.
    (lvi) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8218A, Modification No. 2
issued to Norwalk Power LLC in Norwalk.
    (lvii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8218A, Modification No. 3
issued to Norwalk Power LLC in Norwalk.
    (lviii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8221A, Modification No. 1
issued to Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. in Waterford.
    (lix) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8221A, Modification No. 2
issued to Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. in Waterford.
    (lx) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8222A, Modification No. 1
issued to Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. in Waterford.
    (lxi) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8222A, Modification No. 2
issued to Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. in Waterford.
    (lxii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8288 issued to Dominion
Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. in Waterford.
    (lxiii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8288, Modification No. 1
issued to Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. in Waterford.
    (lxiv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8240, Modification No. 2
issued to PSEG Power Connecticut LLC in New Haven.
    (lxv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8240, Modification No. 3
issued to PSEG Power Connecticut LLC in New Haven.
    (lxvi) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8243, Modification No. 1
issued to PSEG Power Connecticut LLC in New Haven.
    (lxvii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8243, Modification No. 2
issued to PSEG Power Connecticut LLC in New Haven.
    (lxviii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8241, Modification No. 2
issued to PSEG Power Connecticut LLC in Bridgeport.
    (lxix) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8241, Modification No. 3
issued to PSEG Power Connecticut LLC in Bridgeport.
    (lxx) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8244, Modification No. 2
issued to PSEG Power Connecticut LLC in Bridgeport.
    (lxxi) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8244, Modification No. 3
issued to PSEG Power Connecticut LLC in Bridgeport.
    (lxxii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8253, Modification No. 2
issued to PSEG Power Connecticut LLC in Bridgeport.
    (lxxiii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8253, Modification No. 3
issued to

PSEG Power Connecticut LLC in Bridgeport.
    (lxxiv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8301 issued to PSEG Power
LLC, PSEG Fossil LLC, and PSEG Power Connecticut LLC in Bridgeport.
    (lxxv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8305 issued to PSEG Power
LLC, PSEG Fossil LLC, and PSEG Power Connecticut LLC in New Haven and
Bridgeport.
    (lxxvi) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8249, Modification No. 2
issued to Capitol District Energy Center Cogeneration Associates in
Hartford.
    (lxxvii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8249, Modification No. 3
issued to Capitol District Energy Center Cogeneration Associates in
Hartford.
    (lxxviii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8298 issued to Capitol
District Energy Center Cogeneration Associates in Hartford.
    (lxxix) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8261, Modification No. 1
issued to Algonquin Power Windsor Locks LLC in Windsor Locks.
    (lxxx) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8261, Modification No. 2
issued to Algonquin Power Windsor Locks LLC in Windsor Locks.
    (lxxxi) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8299 issued to Algonquin
Power Windsor Locks LLC in Windsor Locks.
    (lxxxii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8269 issued to Cascades
Boxboard Group Connecticut LLC in Versailles.
    (lxxxiii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8269, Modification No. 1
issued to Cascades Boxboard Group Connecticut LLC in Versailles.
    (lxxxiv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8297 issued to Cascades
Boxboard Group Connecticut LLC in Versailles.
    (lxxxv) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8272 issued to NE Hydro
Generating Company in Preston.
    (lxxxvi) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8279 issued to First Light
Hydro Generating Company in Preston.
    (lxxxvii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8303 issued to First
Light Hydro Generating Company in Preston.
    (lxxxviii) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8300 issued to NRG
Energy, Inc., Middletown Power LLC, NRG Middletown Operations Inc.,
Montville Power LLC, NRG Montville Operations Inc., Norwalk Power LLC,
NRG Norwalk Harbor Operations Inc., and Connecticut Jet Power LLC in
Branford, Greenwich, Torrington, Middletown, Norwalk, Milford, and
Montville.
    (lxxxix) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8306 issued to NRG Energy,
Inc., Middletown Power LLC, NRG Middletown Operations Inc., Montville
Power LLC, NRG Montville Operations Inc., Norwalk Power LLC, and NRG
Norwalk Harbor Operations Inc. in Middletown, Montville, and Norwalk.
    (xc) Trading Agreement and Order No. 8110A issued to Yale
University in New Haven.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-21453 Filed 9-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: February 24, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 35)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 8177-8180]
[DOCID:fr24fe09-17]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30650; Amdt. No. 3307]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective February 24, 2009. The compliance date
for each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of February 24, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_
federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability--All SIAPs are available online free of charge. Visit
http://nfdc.faa.gov to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and
Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry J. Hodges, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS-420) Flight Technologies and Programs Division,
Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by amending the referenced SIAPs.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP is listed on the
appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National Flight Data
Center (FDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is incorporated
by reference in the amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and
Sec.  97.20 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use the regulatory
text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction on charts
printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and

publication of the complete description of each SIAP contained in FAA
form documents is unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR
sections and specifies the types of SIAP and the corresponding
effective dates. This amendment also identifies the airport and its
location, the procedure and the amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP as amended in the transmittal. For safety and
timeliness of change considerations, this amendment incorporates only
specific changes contained for each SIAP as modified by FDC/P-NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs, as modified by FDC P-NOTAM, and contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these changes to
SIAPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific conditions
existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in this rule
have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an emergency
action of immediate flight safety relating directly to published
aeronautical charts. The circumstances which created the need for all
these SIAP amendments requires making them effective in less than 30
days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs
and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and public procedure
before adopting these SIAPs are impracticable and contrary to the
public interest and, where applicable, that good cause exists for
making these SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (Air).

    Issued in Washington, DC on January 23, 2009.
John M. Allen,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations, Part 97, 14 CFR part 97, is amended by amending
Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, effective at 0901 UTC on the
dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:
    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, ISMLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SIAPs; Sec.  97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SIAPs,

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    FDC date        State           City             Airport        FDC No.                 Subject
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
01/06/09.......  NJ          WOODBINE.........  WOODBINE MUNI....     9/0353  GPS RWY 19, ORIG-A
01/07/09.......  TN          TRULLAHOMA.......  TULLAHOMA GNL/WM      9/0398  VOR RWY 24, ORIG-A
                                                 NORTHERN FLD.
01/07/09.......  TN          TULLAHOMA........  TULLAHOMA RGNL/WM     9/0399  RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, ORIG
                                                 NORTHERN FLD.
01/07/09.......  TN          TULLAHOMA........  TULLAHOMA RGNL/WM     9/0412  RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, ORIG-B
                                                 NORTHERN FLD.
01/07/09.......  HI          HILO.............  HILO INTL........     9/0577  ILS RWY 26, AMDT 12A
01/07/09.......  HI          HILO.............  HILO INTL........     9/0581  VOR/DME OR TACAN RWY 26, AMDT 5B
01/07/09.......  HI          HILO.............  HILO INTL........     9/0582  VOR/DME OR TACAN-A, AMDT 7A
01/07/09.......  HI          HILO.............  HILO INTL........     9/0583  VOR-B, ORIG-A
01/07/09.......  WA          WALLA WALLA......  WALLA WALLA           9/0603  NDB RWY 20, AMDT 5A
                                                 REGIONAL.
01/06/09.......  MN          BEMIDJI..........  BEMIDJI RGNL.....     9/0635  ILS OR LOC RWY 31, AMDT 4
01/08/09.......  IL          CHICAGO..........  CHICAGO-O HARE        9/0639  ILS OR LOC RWY 9R, AMDT 9
                                                 INTL.
01/08/09.......  IL          CHICAGO..........  CHICAGO-O HARE        9/0640  ILS OR LOC RWY 27L, ILS RWY 27L
                                                 INTL.                         (CAT II), ILS RWY 27L (CAT III),
                                                                               AMDT 28
01/08/09.......  IL          CHICAGO..........  CHICAGO-O HARE        9/0641  ILS OR LOC RWY 9L, ILS RWY 9L (CAT
                                                 INTL.                         II), ILS RWY 9L (CAT III), ORIG
01/08/09.......  IL          CHICAGO..........  CHICAGO-O HARE        9/0642  ILS OR LOC RWY 27R, ILS RWY 27R
                                                 INTL.                         (CAT II), ILS RWY 27R (CAT III),
                                                                               ORIG
01/08/09.......  IL          CHICAGO..........  CHICAGO-O HARE        9/0643  TAKEOFF MINIMUMS AND OBSTACLE DP,
                                                 INTL.                         AMDT 16

01/08/09.......  MN          MINNEAPOLIS......  MINNEAPOLIS-ST        9/0652  ILS OR LOC RWY 35, ILS RWY 35 (CAT
                                                 PAUL INTL/WOLD                II), ILS RWY 35 (CAT III), AMDT 1
                                                 CHAMBERLAIN.
01/08/09.......  GQ          AGANA............  GUAM INTL........     9/0787  RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 6L, ORIG-A
01/12/09.......  WA          PUYALLUP.........  PIERCE COUNTY-        9/1072  TAKEOFF MINIMUMS AND OBSTACLE DP,
                                                 THUN FIELD.                   AMDT 1
01/12/09.......  CA          SAN BERNARDINO...  SAN BERNARDINO        9/1074  ILS OR LOC Z RWY 6, AMDT 2A
                                                 INTL.
01/13/09.......  NC          WILSON...........  WILSON INDUSTRIAL     9/1202  RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, AMDT 1
                                                 AIR CENTER.
01/13/09.......  NC          WILSON...........  WILSON INDUSTRIAL     9/1203  RNAV (GPS) RWY 21, ORIG
                                                 AIR CENTER.
01/13/09.......  NC          WILSON...........  WILSON INDUSTRIAL     9/1204  RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, AMDT 1
                                                 AIR CENTER.
01/13/09.......  NC          WILSON...........  WILSON INDUSTRIAL     9/1205  RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, ORIG
                                                 AIR CENTER.
01/13/09.......  NC          WILSON...........  WILSON INDUSTRIAL     9/1206  RNAV (GPS) RWY 3, AMDT 1
                                                 AIR CENTER.
01/13/09.......  AZ          PHOENIX..........  PHOENIX SKY           9/1273  TAKEOFF MINIMUMS AND OBSTACLE DP,
                                                 HARBOR INTL.                  AMDT 4
01/13/09.......  AZ          PHOENIX..........  PHOENIX SKY           9/1274  ILS OR LOC RWY 7R, AMDT 1C
                                                 HARBOR INTL.
01/13/09.......  AZ          PHOENIX..........  PHOENIX SKY           9/1275  ILS OR LOC RWY 8, ORIG-A
                                                 HARBOR INTL.
01/13/09.......  AZ          PHOENIX..........  PHOENIX SKY           9/1276  ILS OR LOC RWY 26, ORIG-B
                                                 HARBOR INTL.
01/13/09.......  AZ          PHOENIX..........  PHOENIX SKY           9/1277  ILS RWY 25L, AMDT 1B
                                                 HARBOR INTL.
01/13/09.......  AZ          PHOENIX..........  PHOENIX SKY           9/1278  ILS OR LOC RWY 7L, AMDT 10B
                                                 HARBOR INTL.
01/14/09.......  AL          MUSCLE SHOALS....  NORTHWEST ALABAMA     9/1355  VOR RWY 29, AMDT 27
                                                 REGIONAL.
01/14/09.......  CA          SANTA ANA........  JOHN WAYNE-ORANGE     9/1413  RNAV (GPS) RWY 19R, AMDT 1
                                                 COUNTY.
01/15/09.......  TX          MOUNT PLEASANT...  MOUNT PLEASANT        9/1597  VOR/DME A, ORIG
                                                 RGNL.
01/15/09.......  CO          DURANGO..........  DURANGO-LA PLATA      9/1650  VOR/DME RWY 2, AMDT 4B
                                                 COUNTY.
01/15/09.......  AS          PAGO PAGO........  PAGO PAGO INTL...     9/1651  TAKEOFF MINIMUMS AND OBSTACLE DP,
                                                                               ORIG
01/15/09.......  AS          PAGO PAGO........  PAGO PAGO INTL...     9/1652  ILS/DME RWY 5, AMDT 13C
01/15/09.......  AS          PAGO PAGO........  PAGO PAGO INTL...     9/1654  NDB-C, AMDT 6A
01/15/09.......  AS          PAGO PAGO........  PAGO PAGO INTL...     9/1655  VOR/DME OR TACAN-B, AMDT 5B
01/15/09.......  AS          PAGO PAGO........  PAGO PAGO INTL...     9/1657  VOR/DME OR TACAN-A, AMDT 4
01/15/09.......  ID          COEUR D ALENE....  COEUR D ALENE AIR     9/1668  VOR RWY 5, ORIG
                                                 TERMINAL.
01/15/09.......  ID          COEUR D ALENE....  COEUR D ALENE AIR     9/1669  VOR/DME RWY 1, AMDT 1
                                                 TERMINAL.
01/15/09.......  ID          COEUR D ALENE....  COEUR D ALENE AIR     9/1670  NDB RWY 5, AMDT 2
                                                 TERMINAL.
01/15/09.......  ID          COEUR D ALENE....  COEUR D ALENE AIR     9/1671  ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 5, AMDT 5
                                                 TERMINAL.
01/16/09.......  FL          TALLAHASSEE......  TALLAHASSEE           9/1948  ILS OR LOC RWY 27, AMDT 9
                                                 REGIONAL.
01/16/09.......  OH          COLUMBUS.........  RICKENBACKER INTL     9/2429  ILS RWY 5R, ILS RWY 5R (CAT II),
                                                                               AMDT 2
01/16/09.......  OH          CLEVELAND........  CLEVELAND-HOPKINS     9/2430  ILS OR LOC RWY 24L, AMDT 21
                                                 INTL.
01/16/09.......  OH          COLUMBUS.........  RICKENBACKER INTL     9/2432  ILS RWY 23L, ORIG-D
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. E9-3000 Filed 2-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 142 (Thursday, July 23, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44496-44498]
[FR Doc No: 2020-15602]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0127; FRL-10012-23-Region 9]

Air Plan Approval; California; Sacramento Metropolitan Air
Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management
District (SMAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These revisions concern emissions of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) from the surface coating operations of plastic parts and
products. We are proposing to approve a local rule to regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the ``Act'') and we
are proposing to approve a negative declaration for a subcategory of a
control techniques guidelines (CTG) source in the SMAQMD.
    We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a
final action.

DATES: Any comments must arrive by August 24, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2019-0127 at https://www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at
Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written
comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public
comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and
general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3024<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rule and negative declaration did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of this rule and negative
declaration?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule and the negative
declaration?
    B. Do the submissions meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. Public Comment and Proposed Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rule and negative declaration did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rule and the negative declaration addressed by
this proposal with the dates that they were adopted by the local air
agency and submitted to the EPA by the California Air Resources Board.

                                Table 1--Submitted Rule and Negative Declaration
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Local agency              Rule No.                Rule title                 Adopted        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SMAQMD........................             468  Surface Coating of Plastic Parts      03/22/2018      05/23/2018
                                                 and Products.
SMAQMD........................  ..............  Negative Declaration for              03/22/2018       6/11/2018
                                                 ``Control Techniques Guidelines
                                                 for Miscellaneous Metal and
                                                 Plastic Parts Coatings,'' EPA-
                                                 453/R-08-003, September 2008
                                                 (Pleasure Craft Coating Portion
                                                 Only) (``Pleasure Craft Coating
                                                 Neg Dec'').
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 23, 2018, the EPA determined that the submittal for
SMAQMD Rule 468 and the Pleasure Craft Coating Neg Dec met the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met
before formal EPA review.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Letter from Elizabeth Adams, Director, Air Division,
Environmental Protection Agency to Richard Corey, Executive Officer,
California Air Resources Board, stating fulfillment of completeness
criteria of 40 CFR part 51, Appendix V, dated August 23, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Are there other versions of this rule and negative declaration?

    There are no previous versions of Rule 468 in the SIP. There are no
previous versions of the Pleasure Craft Neg Dec in the SMAQMD portion
of the California SIP for the 1997, 2008 and 2015 8-hour ozone national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule?

    VOCs contribute to the production of ground-level ozone or
``smog,'' and particulate matter, which harm human health and the
environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit
regulations that control VOC emissions. Rule 468 controls VOC emissions
from plastic parts and products; and automotive/transportation and
business machines plastic parts coating operations. The EPA's technical
support document (TSD) has more information about this rule and EPA's
evaluation.

II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule and the negative declaration?

    Rules in the SIP must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)),
must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment
and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA
section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements
in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions
reductions (see CAA section 193).
    Generally, SIP rules must require reasonably available control
technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a CTG
document and for each non-CTG major source of VOCs in ozone
nonattainment areas classified as Moderate or above (see CAA section
182(b)(2)). The SMAQMD regulates an ozone nonattainment area classified
as Severe nonattainment for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour NAAQS (40 CFR
81.305), and Moderate nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
Therefore, this rule must implement RACT.
    States should submit for SIP approval negative declarations for
those source categories for which they have not adopted CTG-based
regulations (because they have no sources above the CTG-recommended
applicability threshold), regardless of whether such negative
declarations were made for an earlier SIP.\2\ To do so, the submittal
should provide reasonable assurance that no sources subject to the CTG
requirements currently exist in the ozone nonattainment area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 57 FR 13498, 13512 (April 16, 1992).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Guidance and policy documents that we used to evaluate
enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements
for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following:

    1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,''
57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992).
    2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies,
and Deviations,'' EPA, May 5, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January
11, 1990).
    3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
    4. ``Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and
Plastic Parts Coatings,'' EPA-453/R-08-003, September 2008.

B. Do the submissions meet the evaluation criteria?

    This rule is consistent with CAA requirements and relevant guidance
regarding enforceability, RACT and SIP revisions. The TSDs for the rule
and negative declaration have more information on our evaluation.
Moreover, the negative declaration satisfies the certification
requirement, and the EPA's independent research yielded no indication
of sources in the SMAQMD portion of the nonattainment area that would
be subject to the CTG subcategory.

C. Public Comment and Proposed Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA proposes to
fully approve the submitted rule and the negative declaration because
they fulfill all relevant requirements. We will accept comments from
the public on this proposal until August 24, 2020. If we take final
action to approve the submitted rule and negative declaration, our
final action will incorporate the rule and the negative declaration
into the federally enforceable SIP.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule,
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the SMAQMD rule and the negative declaration described in
Table 1 of this preamble. The EPA has made, and will continue to make,
these materials available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve state law
as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: July 14, 2020.
John Busterud,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2020-15602 Filed 7-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 62 (Tuesday, March 31, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 17929]
[FR Doc No: 2020-06610]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-88476; File No. SR-PEARL-2020-03]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of
Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on Proposed Rule
Change To Adopt Rules Governing the Trading of Equity Securities

March 25, 2020.
    On January 24, 2020, MIAX PEARL, LLC (``MIAX PEARL'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to adopt rules governing the trading of equity
securities. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on February 12, 2020.\3\ The Commission has received
no comment letters on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88132 (February 6,
2020), 85 FR 8053.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day for this filing is March 28, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is extending the 45-day time period for Commission
action on the proposed rule change. The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period within which to take action on
the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the
proposed rule change.
    Accordingly, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I) of the Act \5\
and for the reasons stated above, the Commission designates May 12,
2020, as the date by which the Commission shall either approve,
disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-PEARL-2020-03).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-06610 Filed 3-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73611-73612]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30701]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC12-35-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Solar One LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act for the Disposition of Jurisdictional Facilities,
Request for Expedited Consideration and Confidential Treatment of
Arizona Solar One LLC.
    Filed Date: 11/18/11.
    Accession Number: 20111118-5200.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/9/11.

    Docket Numbers: EC12-36-000.
    Applicants: Cross-Sound Cable Company, LLC, Brookfield
Infrastructure Corporation.
    Description: Application for Authorization under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act, and for Expedited Consideration, Confidential
Treatment and Waivers of Cross-Sound Cable Company, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 11/18/11.
    Accession Number: 20111118-5203.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/9/11.

    Docket Numbers: EC12-37-000.
    Applicants: MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company, Elk Wind Energy
LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization of Transaction Under
Section 203 of the Federal Power Act and Request for Expedited
Consideration of Elk Wind Energy LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 11/18/11.
    Accession Number: 20111118-5205.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/9/11.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4665-001.
    Applicants: North Branch Resources, LLC.
    Description: Supplement to Category 1 Status Request to be
effective 11/18/2011.
    Filed Date: 11/18/11.
    Accession Number: 20111118-5159.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/9/11.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-440-000.
    Applicants: Bishop Hill Energy LLC.
    Description: Assignment, Co-Tenancy, and Shared Facilities
Agreement to be effective 12/21/2011.
    Filed Date: 11/18/11.
    Accession Number: 20111118-5130.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/9/11.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-441-000.
    Applicants: Bishop Hill Energy II LLC.
    Description: Assignment, Co-Tenancy, and Shared Facilities
Agreement to be effective 12/21/2011.
    Filed Date: 11/18/11.
    Accession Number: 20111118-5131.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/9/11.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-442-000.
    Applicants: Bishop Hill Energy III LLC.
    Description: Assignment, Co-Tenancy, and Shared Facilities
Agreement to be effective 12/21/2011.
    Filed Date: 11/18/11.
    Accession Number: 20111118-5132.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/9/11.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-443-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: 2273 Western Farmers Electric Coop., Inc Contingency
Connection Agreement to be effective 10/19/2011.
    Filed Date: 11/18/11.
    Accession Number: 20111118-5157.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/9/11.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-444-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: 1148R14 American Electric Power Service Corporation
NITSA NOA to be effective 11/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 11/18/11.
    Accession Number: 20111118-5160.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/9/11.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-445-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: Revisions to the PJM Tariff Schedule 12 Appendices re
the RTEP to be effective 2/16/2012.
    Filed Date: 11/18/11.
    Accession Number: 20111118-5167.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/19/11.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-446-000.
    Applicants: PJS Capital LLC.
    Description: PJS Capital, LLC Electric Tariff Original Volume No 1
Cancellation Notice to be effective 12/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 11/18/11.

    Accession Number: 20111118-5193.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/9/11.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 21, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-30701 Filed 11-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: February 27, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 38)]
[Notices]
[Page 8721]
[DOCID:fr27fe07-62]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-312-162]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Termination of
Negotiated Rate Agreement

February 21, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 12, 2007, Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company (Tennessee) tendered for filing a notice of termination of a
negotiated rate agreement between Tennessee and Inergy Gas Marketing,
LLC (Inergy), effective February 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-3353 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 250 (Monday, December 31, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77162-77165]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31256]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-68526; File No. SR-FINRA-2012-010]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
FINRA Rule 6440 (Trading and Quotation Halt in OTC Equity Securities)

December 21, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 20, 2012, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC''
or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by FINRA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA Rule 6440 (Trading and Quotation
Halt in OTC Equity Securities to clarify that FINRA may (1) initiate a
trading and quotation halt in an OTC Equity Security upon notice of a
foreign regulatory halt for news pending, including notice from a
reliable third-party source; (2) continue to halt trading and quoting
in such OTC Equity Security until notice from the appropriate foreign
regulatory authority is received that it has or intends to resume
trading in the security, even if such halt is longer than 10 business
days; and (3) extend a halt initiated under Rule 6440(a)(3) for an
extraordinary event beyond 10 business days if it determines that the
basis for the halt still exists.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on FINRA's Web
site at http://www.finra.org, at the principal office of FINRA and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    FINRA Rule 6440 (Trading and Quotation Halt in OTC Equity
Securities) provides FINRA with the authority to initiate a trading and
quotation halt for OTC Equity Securities.\3\ Generally, Rule 6440(a)
provides that, in circumstances where it is necessary to protect
investors and the public interest, FINRA may direct members to halt
trading and quotations of an OTC Equity Security when: (1) A foreign
securities exchange or market halts trading in its market, for
regulatory reasons, in an OTC Equity Security or the security
underlying an American Depository Receipt (``ADR'') that is an OTC
Equity Security (``OTC ADR'') that is listed on or registered with such
foreign securities exchange or market, except that FINRA will not
impose halts if the foreign halt was imposed solely for material news,
a regulatory filing deficiency or operational reasons (``Foreign
Regulatory Halt''); (2) a national securities exchange or foreign
securities exchange halts trading in a listed security of which the OTC
Equity Security or the security underlying the OTC ADR is a derivative
or component (``Derivative Halt''); or (3) FINRA determines an
extraordinary event has occurred or is ongoing that has a material
effect on the market for the OTC Equity Security, or has the potential
to cause major disruption to the marketplace or significant uncertainty
in the settlement and clearing process (``Extraordinary Event Halt'').
Pursuant to Rule 6440(b)(3), FINRA has authority to halt trading and
quotations in the OTC market pursuant

to an Extraordinary Event Halt for up to 10 business days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ ``OTC Equity Security'' means any equity security that is
not an ``NMS stock'' as that term is defined in Rule 600(b)(47) of
SEC Regulation NMS; provided, however, that the term ``OTC Equity
Security'' shall not include any Restricted Equity Security. See
FINRA Rule 6420(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA is proposing to amend Rule 6440 to: (1) Eliminate the
restriction in Rule 6440(a)(1) on FINRA's ability to initiate a Foreign
Regulatory Halt when the foreign halt is imposed for material news; (2)
modify the halt procedures outlined in paragraph (b) of the Rule to
clarify that FINRA may initiate a trading and quotation halt in an OTC
Equity Security as a result of a Foreign Regulatory Halt or Derivative
Halt upon notice from a reliable third-party source; (3) modify the
halt procedures outlined in paragraph (b) of the Rule to clarify that
in instances where FINRA initiates a trading and quotation halt upon
notice of a foreign halt pursuant to a Foreign Regulatory Halt or
Derivative Halt, trading and quotation in the OTC Equity Security or
the OTC ADR, FINRA may continue the halt until such time as FINRA
receives notice that trading has been resumed in the security on the
appropriate securities exchange on which it is listed or registered or
by the other applicable regulatory authority, even if such halt is
longer than 10 business days; and (4) amend Rule 6440 Supplementary
Material .01 to clarify that FINRA may extend and continue in effect an
Extraordinary Event Halt for subsequent periods of up to 10 business
days each if, at the time of any such extension, FINRA finds that the
basis for the halt still exists and determines that the continuation of
the halt beyond the prior 10 business day period is necessary in the
public interest and for the protection of investors.
Background
    FINRA performs several critical functions with respect to the OTC
market in furtherance of its obligations under Exchange Act Section 15A
to have rules that are designed ``to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.'' \4\ In particular, FINRA
believes its authority to halt trading and quotations in OTC Equity
Securities pursuant to Rule 6440 is a valuable tool for maintaining
fair and orderly markets, as provided in Exchange Act Section 15A.
However, FINRA does not operate a ``listed'' market and thus has no
ability to compel issuers to disclose information. While FINRA may
obtain halt information provided by issuers to national securities
markets or foreign securities exchanges or markets on which their
securities are listed or registered, such markets are under no
obligation to provide halt information to FINRA. For this reason,
FINRA's current authority to halt trading and quotations in an OTC
Equity Security as a result of a Foreign Regulatory Halt provides that
FINRA will not halt for material news, regulatory deficiencies or
operational reasons. However, FINRA believes that with the
globalization of securities markets, cross-border coordination of
trading and quotation halts is important to ensure fairness in trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposal
    FINRA is proposing several amendments to Rule 6440. The first
amendment that FINRA is proposing would eliminate the restriction in
Rule 6440(a)(1) on FINRA's ability to initiate a halt as a result of a
Foreign Regulatory Halt when the foreign halt is imposed for material
news. FINRA has historically not halted in these instances because, as
noted above, FINRA lacks privity with OTC issuers and cannot compel
such issuers to disclose information to FINRA. However, with the growth
of foreign securities markets and the ease at which trading can occur
across jurisdictions and markets (especially exchanges in Canada where
many issuers of OTC Equity Securities are listed), FINRA believes
increased coordination of trading halts across markets will protect
investors by reducing instances of potentially material disparities in
information regarding the security or even fraudulent or manipulative
trading in the security and act to protect U.S. investors. Moreover,
such coordination is consistent with how FINRA currently imposes news
pending trading halts on OTC Equity Securities that are derivatives or
components of securities listed on national or foreign securities
exchanges pursuant to Rule 6440(a)(2).
    As noted above, FINRA would be relying on the ability of the
foreign market on which the security is listed or registered to oversee
the issuer and evaluate news pending or other information regarding the
issuer and the securities to determine if a trading halt is warranted.
For example, a foreign exchange may halt trading and quoting in the
security of an issuer on its market when the issuer is the subject of a
significant corporate event, such as a change in ownership or corporate
structuring as a result of a merger or acquisition, borrows a
significant amount of funds or triggers events of default, enters into
or terminates a significant contract, or is subject to major
litigation.
    The limitations in Rule 6440(a)(1) relating to FINRA's halt
authority where the Foreign Regulatory Halt is imposed solely for a
regulatory filing deficiency would remain because FINRA believes that
the regulatory filing deficiency may be a listing jurisdiction
requirement that is not consistent across market centers and may be of
less concern to market participants outside that jurisdiction. For
example, in some instances, a foreign regulatory jurisdiction may
impose a regulatory filing deficiency halt for failure to file timely
financials or information related to significant corporate events. The
limitation with regard to the operational halt would also remain
because these halts may reflect local market trading conditions only.
Rules relating to regulatory filing deficiency halts and operational
halts are not consistent across market centers.
    It is important to note that with respect to ``domestic'' OTC
Equity Securities (e.g., securities that are not ADRs or are listed or
registered with a foreign securities exchange or market), FINRA will
have the authority to halt trading and quotation solely for news
pending, only if such OTC Equity Security is a derivative or component
of a security listed on or registered with a national securities
exchange. Where the domestic OTC Equity Security is not a derivative or
component of a security listed or registered with an exchange, FINRA
will not have the authority to halt trading or quotation of the
security in the OTC market. FINRA believes this distinction is
consistent with the authority it is proposing with respect to foreign
stocks given that in both cases, FINRA would be relying on the market
on which the stock is listed or registered or the regulator with direct
authority over the issuer, to compel timely notification of news
pending events and determine whether trading should be halted.
    The second amendment that FINRA is proposing would modify the halt
procedures outlined in paragraph (b)(1) of the Rule to clarify that
FINRA may initiate a trading and quotation halt in an OTC Equity
Security as a result of a Foreign Regulatory Halt or Derivative Halt
upon notice from another reliable third-party source where FINRA can
validate the information provided. Rule 6440(b)(1) currently provides
that, upon receipt of information from a securities exchange or market,
or regulatory authority overseeing the issuer, exchange or market,
FINRA will promptly evaluate the information and determine if a trading
and quotation halt in the OTC Equity Security is

appropriate. Proposed Rule 6440(b)(1) would clarify that upon notice,
not simply receipt of information, of a Foreign Regulatory Halt or
Derivative Halt from: (i) the national or foreign securities exchange
or market on which the OTC Equity Security or the security underlying
the OTC ADR is listed or registered; (ii) a regulatory authority
overseeing such issuer, exchange or market; or (iii) another reliable
third-party source where FINRA can validate the information provided,
FINRA will promptly initiate a trading and quotation halt in the OTC
Equity Security. FINRA generally receives notice of foreign trading and
quotation halts from official sources, such as the relevant foreign
exchange or regulator (i.e., the Canadian Securities Commission, the
Toronto Stock Exchange, the London Stock Exchange, etc.). However, in
some cases, notice of a trading and quotation halt may be received from
reliable third-party sources, such as The Depository Trust & Clearing
Corporation, broker-dealers or financial news data vendors. FINRA
verifies all third-party information relating to trading and quotation
halts in foreign markets before it acts upon such information.
    FINRA believes having the authority to halt trading and quotation
in an OTC Equity Security upon notice from a reliable third-party
source that can be validated provides a valuable tool that will allow
FINRA to act more promptly to initiate trading and quotation halts in
such securities.
    The third amendment that FINRA is proposing would modify the halt
procedures outlined in paragraph (b)(2) of the Rule to clarify the
circumstances under which FINRA will resume trading after initiating a
Foreign Regulatory Halt or Derivative Halt. Proposed Rule 6440(b)(2)
clarifies that FINRA may continue the halt in trading and quoting in
the OTC market for the OTC Equity Security until such time as FINRA
receives notice that trading has resumed in the security on the
national or foreign securities exchange on which it is listed or
registered, even if such halt is longer than 10 business days. FINRA
adopted the 10-business day halt standard largely to be consistent with
trading suspensions ordered by the SEC pursuant to Exchange Act Section
12(k).\5\ However, with respect to halts in OTC securities as a result
of a Foreign Regulatory Halt or a Derivative Halt for a security listed
on or registered with a national or foreign securities exchange, FINRA
believes that such halt should run concurrently with, and for as long
as, the halt imposed on the security in the market on which it is
listed or registered. FINRA will disseminate an appropriate public
notice that a trading and quotation halt under the Rule is no longer in
effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(k).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The fourth amendment that FINRA is proposing would modify Rule 6440
Supplementary Material .01 to clarify that FINRA may extend and
continue in effect a trading and quotation halt under the Extraordinary
Event Halt authority for subsequent periods of up to 10 business days
each, if at the time of any such extension, FINRA finds that the basis
for the halt still exists and determines that the continuation of the
halt beyond the prior 10 business day period is necessary in the public
interest and for the protection of investors. FINRA believes the
authority to halt beyond the initial 10 business day period is vital in
the OTC marketplace where concerns regarding settlement and clearance,
pricing, or other extraordinary events can take time to be resolved.
FINRA is also proposing to add headings to Rule 6440 Supplementary
Material .01 and .02 for clarity.
    FINRA will announce the effective date of the proposed rule change
in a Regulatory Notice to be published no later than 60 days following
Commission approval. The effective date will be no later than 30 days
following publication of the Regulatory Notice announcing Commission
approval.
2. Statutory Basis
    FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\6\ which requires, among
other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. FINRA believes that the proposed amendments to Rule
6440 will act to increase coordination of trading halts across markets
and help reduce the potential for investors' trading based on
materially disparate levels of information, and even fraudulent or
manipulative activities in an OTC security, while it is halted by
another regulatory authority. In addition, FINRA believes the authority
to extend Extraordinary Event Halts for the additional 10 business day
periods is vital in the OTC marketplace where concerns regarding
settlement and clearance, pricing, or other extraordinary events can
take time to be resolved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. FINRA will exercise judgment in
each trading halt situation to assure that the halt is necessary to
protect investors and not unnecessarily burden competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-FINRA-2012-010 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2012-010. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the

Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please
use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the
Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of FINRA. All comments received
will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2012-010, and should be submitted
on or before January 22, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-31256 Filed 12-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P