[Federal Register: July 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 126)]
[Notices]
[Page 38172-38173]
[DOCID:fr01jy10-136]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration
(FRA) has received a request for a waiver of compliance from certain
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.

DesertXpress Enterprises, LLC

[Docket Number FRA-2010-0098]

    The DesertXpress Enterprises, LLC (DXE) seeks a waiver of
compliance from certain provisions of Title 49 of the CFR.
Specifically, DXE is considering purchasing vehicles that are
constructed to and meet European safety standards for crash-worthiness
and related safety measures for use on its proposed high-speed rail
corridor between Victorville, California, and Las Vegas, Nevada. DXE
seeks relief from certain requirements of 49 CFR part 238, Passenger
Equipment Safety Standards (Sec. Sec.  238.115, 238.121, 238.435,
238.447, 238.403, 238.405, 238.407, 238.409, 238.411, 238.413, 238.417,
238.419); 49 CFR part 231, Railroad Safety Appliance Standards (Sec.
231.14); and 49 CFR part 229, Railroad Locomotive Safety Standards
(Sec.  229.141).
    DXE intends to design, develop, and construct an intercity high-
speed passenger-only rail corridor, exclusive of freight operations,
connecting Victorville, CA, and Las Vegas, NV, along a 183-mile long,
double track alignment. The system will feature a high-speed train
operation at speeds up to 150 mph (FRA Class 8), featuring preferred
electric multiple unit (EMU) technology train-sets based upon the
Regina system, which was developed by Bombardier in Sweden. Most of the
alignment will run parallel to the Interstate-15 (I-15) highway
corridor, making maximum use of excess freeway right of way and
minimizing impact upon the largely undeveloped land alongside the
highway. There will be no highway-rail grade crossings with road
vehicles.
    DXE is considering purchasing non-FRA compliant EMU Regina train-
sets for this high-speed rail system, and is requesting this relief
primarily as a result of DXE's decision to construct and operate this
project as a grade-separated, passenger-only system, with no freight
trains or any other dissimilar trains operating on the line and no
highway-rail grade crossings. DXE asserts that an added level of safety
is further provided by DXE's exclusive, grade-separated system, in
combination with advanced positive train control, broken rail
detection, unique highway/rail barrier protection, and use of an
intrusion detection system. According to DXE, these EMU's will offer
higher reliability than typical FRA-compliant equipment, higher energy
efficiency due to light vehicle weight, and better performance due to
power-to-weight ratio which will enable these train-sets to climb steep
grades. No push-pull or locomotive-hauled trains will be used, so that
in the event of a collision, only identical train-sets will be
involved, thereby simplifying the design requirements for crash-
worthiness.
    Noting that certain provisions in 49 CFR part 231 pertaining to
safety appliances are statutorily required, and therefore not subject
to FRA's waiver authority, DXE also requests that FRA exercise its
authority under 49 U.S.C. 20306 to exempt DXE from certain provisions
of Chapter 203, Title 49 of the United States Code because the EMU
Regina vehicles will be equipped with their own array of safety devices
resulting in equivalent safety.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.

    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-
2010-0098) and may be submitted by any of the following methods:
     Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
    Communications received within 45 days of the date of this notice
will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.--5 p.m.) at the above
facility. All documents in the public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web
site at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the document (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in
the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477) or at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.html.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 25, 2010.
Michael J. Logue,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Compliance and Program
Implementation.
[FR Doc. 2010-16053 Filed 6-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register: November 1, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 211)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64125-64127]
[DOCID:fr01no06-7]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R08-OAR-2006-0564, FRL-8236-8]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Utah; Revisions to the Utah Administrative Code; Direct Final Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Utah on
February 7, 2006. These changes to the Utah Administrative Code revise
some minor technical requirements of Utah's continuous emission
monitoring rules and correct several grammatical errors. The intended
effect of this action is to make federally enforceable those provisions
that EPA is approving. This action is being taken under section 110 of
the Clean Air Act.

DATES: This rule is effective on January 2, 2007 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by December 1, 2006. If
adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that
the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
OAR-2006-0564, by one of the following methods:
      http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for

submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER> (please alert the individual listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing comments).
     Mail: Richard R. Long, Director, Air and Radiation
Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P-
AR, 999 18th Street, Suite 200, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466.
     Hand Delivery: Richard R. Long, Director, Air and
Radiation Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
Mailcode 8P-AR, 999 18th Street, Suite 200, Denver, Colorado 80202-
2466. Such deliveries are only accepted Monday through Friday, 8 a.m.
to 4:55 p.m., excluding federal holidays. Special arrangements should
be made for deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-
2006-0564. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov including any personal information provided, unless

the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or
otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which

means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to EPA, without going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail

address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. For additional

instructions on submitting comments, go to Section I: General
Information portion in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some

information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation

Program, Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA), Region 8, 999 18th Street, Suite 200, Denver, Colorado 80202-
2466. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard
copy of the docket. You may view the hard copy of the docket Monday
through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Kimes, Air and Radiation
Program, Mailcode 8P-AR, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region
8, 999 18th Street, Suite 200, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466, (303) 312-
6445<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. General Information
II. Background
III. EPA's Review of the State of Utah's February 7, 2006 Submittal
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Definitions

    For the purpose of this document, we are giving meaning to certain
words or initials as follows:
    (i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean or refer to the Clean Air
Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.
    (ii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or refer to the United
States Environmental Protection Agency.
    (iii) The initials SIP mean or refer to State Implementation Plan.
    (iv) The words State or Utah mean the State of Utah, unless the
context indicates otherwise.

I. General Information

A. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the

information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    a. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    b. Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to specific
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    c. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    d. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    e. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    f. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
    g. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    h. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.

II. Background

    On February 7, 2006, the Governor of Utah submitted a SIP revision
that contains amendments to Rule R307-170 of the Utah Administrative
Code. The amendments update a key provision of the State's continuous
emissions monitoring rule to be consistent with 40 CFR part 75,
Appendix A, Section 6.2 on which part of the State's rule is based. In
addition, the revision corrects several inconsequential grammatical
errors. The Utah Air Quality Board adopted these amendments on January
4, 2006 and they became effective on January 5, 2006.

III. EPA's Review of the State of Utah's February 7, 2006 Submittal

A. Revisions to the Utah Administrative Code Adopted January 4, 2006
and Effective January 5, 2006

1. Changes to R307-170-7 (1). Performance Specification Audits
    a. The state is adding language consistent with 40 CFR part 75,
Appendix A, Section 6.2, Acid Rain program provisions. This will exempt
sources with monitors subject to the Acid Rain rules from the
requirement for quarterly monitor audits. Under 40 CFR part 75,
Appendix A, Section 6.2, acid rain related monitors require only annual
audits. Without the addition of this exemption the acid rain monitors
would be unnecessarily subject to the same quarterly audits required
under 40 CFR part 60, Appendix B (Standards of Performance for New
Stationary Sources) monitoring standards. EPA is approving the revision
to R307-170-7(1).
2. Typographical and Grammatical Corrections to R307-170-4. Definitions
    a. The state is making typographical and grammatical corrections to
several definitions. EPA is approving the paragraphs which are the
definitions of the following terms: Continuous Emission Monitoring
System; Description Report; Excess Emission Report; Monitor; State
Electronic Data Report; and Summary Report.
3. Typographical and Grammatical Corrections to Assorted Sections
    a. The state is making numerous typographical and grammatical
corrections to several sections. EPA is approving these inconsequential
corrections in the following sections: R307-170-5 (7); R307-170-7 (6);
R307-170-7(6)(a) and (b); and in R307-170-9 sections (5)(a) and (b),
(6)(b), (7)(b), and (9)(a).

IV. Final Action

    EPA is approving the following changes to the Utah Administrative
Code that were submitted by the Governor on February 7, 2006 and
effective on January 5, 2006: R307-170-7(1); R307-170-4; R307-170-5
(7); R307-170-7 (6); R307-170-7(6)(a) and (b); and in R307-170-9
sections (5)(a) and (b), (6)(b), (7)(b), and (9)(a).
    Section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act states that a SIP revision
cannot be approved if the revision would interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress
towards attainment of any National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) or any other applicable requirements of the Act. The Utah SIP
revisions that are the subject of this document do not interfere with
attainment or maintenance of any NAAQS or any other applicable
requirement of the Act. The Governor's February 7, 2006 submittal
merely makes changes to the operational audits of Acid Rain monitors
and inconsequential typographical and grammatical changes. Therefore,
section 110(l) requirements are satisfied.
    EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no
adverse comments; we are approving one minor change and typographical
and grammatical corrections to Utah's air quality rules. However, in
the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register publication,
EPA is publishing a separate document that

will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse
comments are filed. This rule will be effective January 1, 2007 without
further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by December
1, 2006. If the EPA receives adverse comments, EPA will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect. EPA will address all public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if
EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of
the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are
not the subject of an adverse comment.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 2, 2007. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.

    Dated: September 27, 2006.
Carol Rushin,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.

0
40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

 Subpart TT--Utah

0
2. Section 52.2320 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(64) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.2320  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (64) Revisions to State Implementation Plan were submitted by the
State of Utah on February 7, 2006. The revisions are to the Utah
Administrative Code to revise the continuous emission monitoring
requirements for performance audits of acid rain monitors and to
correct several typographical and grammatical errors.
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) Utah Administrative Code sections: R307-170-7(1); R307-170-4;
R307-170-5 (7); R307-170-7 (6); R307-170-7(6)(a) and (b); and in R307-
170-9 sections (5)(a) and (b), (6)(b), (7)(b), and (9)(a); effective
January 5, 2006.

[FR Doc. E6-18377 Filed 10-31-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 134 (Thursday, July 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32302-32303]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14870]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2018-D-2236]

Human Gene Therapy for Retinal Disorders; Draft Guidance for
Industry; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a draft document entitled ``Human Gene Therapy for
Retinal Disorders; Draft Guidance for Industry.'' The draft guidance
provides recommendations to stakeholders developing human gene therapy
(GT) products for retinal disorders affecting adult and pediatric
patients. The draft guidance focuses on issues specific to GT products
for retinal disorders and provides recommendations related to product
development, preclinical testing, and clinical trial design for such GT
products.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by October 10, 2018 to ensure that the Agency considers your
comment on this draft guidance before it begins work on the final
version of the guidance.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on any guidance at any time as
follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for Written/Paper
Submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2018-D-2236 for ``Human Gene Therapy for Retinal Disorders; Draft
Guidance for Industry.'' Received comments will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets
Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available

for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this information as ``confidential.''
Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not be disclosed except
in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law.
For more information about FDA's posting of comments to public dockets,
see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at:
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
    Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance to
the Office of Communication, Outreach and Development, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist the office in
processing your requests. The draft guidance may also be obtained by
mail by calling CBER at 1-800-835-4709 or<PHONE_NUMBER>. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft
guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Moy, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-7911.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft document entitled
``Human Gene Therapy for Retinal Disorders; Draft Guidance for
Industry.'' The draft guidance provides recommendations to stakeholders
developing GT products for retinal disorders affecting adult and
pediatric patients. These disorders vary in etiology, prevalence,
diagnosis, and management, and include genetic as well as age-related
diseases. These disorders manifest with central or peripheral visual
impairment and often with progressive visual loss. The draft guidance
focuses on issues specific to GT products for retinal disorders and
provides recommendations related to product development, preclinical
testing, and clinical trial design for such GT products.
    Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is announcing
the availability of two other human gene therapy draft guidance
documents entitled ``Human Gene Therapy for Hemophilia; Draft Guidance
for Industry'' and ``Human Gene Therapy for Rare Diseases; Draft
Guidance for Industry.''
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on ``Human Gene
Therapy for Retinal Disorders.'' It does not establish any rights for
any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations. This guidance is not subject to Executive
Order 12866.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This draft guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
The collections of information in 21 CFR part 50 have been approved
under OMB control number 0910-0755; the collections of information in
21 CFR part 58 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0119;
the collections of information in 21 CFR part 211 have been approved
under OMB control number 0910-0139; the collections of information in
21 CFR part 312 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0014;
the collections of information in 21 CFR part 601 have been approved
under OMB control number 0910-0338; the collections of information in
the guidance entitled ``Expedited Programs for Serious Conditions--
Drugs and Biologics'' have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0765; and the collections of information in the guidance entitled
``Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants'' have
been approved under OMB control number 0910-0429.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the internet may obtain the draft guidance
at either https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or
https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: July 5, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-14870 Filed 7-11-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 30337]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12528]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:  [to be published].

STATUS:  Closed Meeting.

PLACE:  100 F Street NE., Washington, DC.

DATE AND TIME OF PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED MEETING:  Friday, May 18, 2012 at
11:00 a.m.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING:  Time Change.
    The Closed Meeting scheduled for Friday, May 18, 2012 at 11:00 a.m.
has been changed to Friday, May 18, 2012 at 3:00 p.m.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed,
please contact the Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 18, 2012.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary
[FR Doc. 2012-12528 Filed 5-18-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: March 14, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 49)]
[Notices]
[Page 13123-13124]
[DOCID:fr14mr06-81]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Application for Amendment of License and Soliciting
Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

March 7, 2006.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Amendment of license to upgrade the installed
capacity.
    b. Project No.: 309-053.
    c. Date Filed: February 24, 2006.
    d. Applicant: Brookfield Power Piney & Deep Creek, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Piney Project.
    f. Location: The Project is located on the Clarion River in Clarion
County, Pennsylvania.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Sam Hirschey, Brookfield Power New York,
225 Greenfield Parkway, Suite 201, Liverpool, NY 13088. Tel: (315) 413-
2790.
    i. FERC Contact: Any questions on this notice should be addressed
to Vedula Sarma at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments and/or motions: April 7, 2006.
    k. Description of Filing: Brookfield Power Piney & Deep Creek, LLC
proposes to replace the existing Unit 2 runner with a new runner. The
proposed upgrade would increase the installed capacity of the project
from 28,000 kilowatts to 30,000 kilowatts, and the hydraulic capacity
from 5,400 cfs to 5,600 cfs.
    l. Locations of Applications: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission in the
Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A,
Washington, DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may
also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov

using

the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. You may also
register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to

be notified via e-mail of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3676
or e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A
copy is also available for inspection and reproduction at the address
in item (h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filings must
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS'', ``PROTEST'', OR ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as
applicable, and the Project Number of the particular application to
which the filing refers. All documents (original and eight copies)
should be filed with: Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington DC 20426. A
copy of any motion to intervene must also be served upon each
representative of the Applicant specified in the particular
application.
    p. Agency Comments: Federal, state, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.
    q. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov

under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-3599 Filed 3-13-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66280-66282]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26437]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0483; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-082-AD;
Amendment 39-18012; AD 2014-22-07]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013-16-08 for
certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700,
701, & 702) airplanes, Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705)
airplanes, and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes.
AD 2013-16-08 required inspection of the main landing gear (MLG)
retraction actuator components; corrective actions if necessary; and,
for certain retraction actuators, installation of a new jam nut. This
new AD continues to require those actions. This AD was prompted by a
determination that a certain part was incorrectly identified in a
certain section of AD 2013-16-08. We are issuing this AD to prevent
disconnection of the MLG retraction actuator, which could result in
extension of the MLG without damping, and consequent structural damage
and collapse of the MLG during landing.

DATES: This AD becomes effective December 12, 2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of September 24,
2013 (78 FR 51055, August 20, 2013).

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0483; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
    For Bombardier service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com.
    For Goodrich service information identified in this AD, contact
Goodrich Corporation, Landing Gear, 1400 South Service Road, West
Oakville L6L 5Y7, Ontario, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.goodrich.com/TechPubs.
    You may view this referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2013-16-08, Amendment 39-17546 (78 FR 51055,
August 20, 2013). AD 2013-16-08 applied to certain Bombardier, Inc.
Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702) airplanes,
Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, and Model CL-
600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on July 25, 2014 (79 FR 43322). The NPRM was prompted
by a determination that a certain part was incorrectly identified in a
certain section of AD 2013-16-08.
    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2011-36R1, dated October 3, 2012 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-
2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702) airplanes, Model CL-600-2D15
(Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional
Jet Series 900) airplanes. The MCAI states:

    Corrosion of the main landing gear (MLG) retraction actuator
components was found in-service, either at the interface of the rod
end and the piston or at the bracket and its related pins. This can
cause the MLG retraction actuator to disconnect, leading to an MLG
extension without damping, and a potential for MLG structural damage
and possible collapse during landing.
    This [Canadian] AD mandates the inspection and rectification
[corrective action] of the MLG retraction actuator components.
    This revision is to mandate [, for certain MLG retraction
actuators,] the installation of the new retraction actuator jam nut.
This revision also corrects the background information and updates
Service Bulletin (SB) references.

You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0483-0002.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (79 FR 43322, July 25,
2014) or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed, except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (79 FR 43322, July 25, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 43322, July 25, 2014).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 391 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    The actions required by AD 2013-16-08, Amendment 39-17546 (78 FR
51055, August 20, 2013), and retained in this AD take up to 16 work-
hours per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per work-hour.
Required parts cost about $1,018 per product. Based on these figures,
the estimated cost of the actions that are required by AD 2013-16-08 is
$2,378 per product.
    The new requirements of this AD add no additional economic burden.
    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:

General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by
prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the
Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses
an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products
identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0483; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2013-16-08, Amendment 39-17546 (78 FR 51055, August 20, 2013), and
adding the following new AD:

2014-22-07: Amendment 39-18012. Docket No. FAA-2014-0483;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-082-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective December 12, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2013-16-08, Amendment 39-17546 (78 FR 51055,
August 20, 2013).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the airplanes specified in paragraphs (c)(1)
and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category.
    (1) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700,
701, & 702) airplanes, serial numbers 10002 and subsequent.
    (2) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705)
and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, serial
numbers15001 and subsequent.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Landing
Gear.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report of corrosion of the components
of the main landing gear (MLG) retraction actuator found in service;
the corrosion was found at the interface of the rod end and the
piston, and at the bracket and related pins. We are issuing this AD
to prevent disconnection of the MLG retraction actuator, which could
result in extension of the MLG without damping, and consequent
structural damage and collapse of the MLG during landing.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Inspection of the MLG Retraction Actuator and Corrective
Actions With No Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2013-16-08, Amendment 39-17546 (78 FR 51055, August 20, 2013), with
no changes. For any airplane with an MLG retraction actuator
assembly having any part number and serial number identified in
paragraph 1.A., Effectivity, of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-
32-031, Revision C, dated April 17, 2012, except airplanes on which
modification status ``32-64'' is marked on the identification plate:
At the applicable time specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of
this AD, perform a detailed inspection of the retraction actuator
assembly for evidence of corrosion and security of the jam nut, as
applicable, in accordance with Part A of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-031, Revision
C, dated April 17, 2012; and Goodrich Service Bulletin 49600-32-63
R1, dated May 17, 2011. If any corrosion or unsecured jam nut is
found, before further flight, replace the retract actuator with a
new or serviceable retract actuator; and install the retract
actuator, in accordance with Part A of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-031, Revision
C, dated April 17, 2012. Repeat the inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 1,200 flight hours or 12 months, whichever
occurs first.
    (1) For MLG retraction actuator assemblies on which, as of
September 24, 2013 (the effective date of AD 2013-16-08, Amendment
39-17546 (78 FR 51055, August 20, 2013)), 8,000 or more total flight
hours have accumulated since new or since overhaul, or that have
been in service for more than 4 years since new or since overhaul:
Inspect within 1,200 flight hours or 12 months after September 24,
2013, whichever occurs first.
    (2) For MLG retraction actuator assemblies on which, as of
September 24, 2013 (the effective date of AD 2013-16-08, Amendment
39-17546 (78 FR 51055, August 20, 2013)), less than 8,000 total
flight hours have accumulated since new or since overhaul, and that
have been in service for 4 years or less since new or since
overhaul: Inspect before the accumulation of 9,200 total flight
hours on the MLG retraction actuator assembly since new or since
overhaul or within 5 years in service since new or since overhaul,
whichever occurs first.

(h) Retained Inspection of MLG Retraction Actuator Bracket and Related
Pins, and Corrective Actions With No Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2013-16-08, Amendment 39-17546 (78 FR 51055, August 20, 2013), with
no changes. For any airplane with an MLG dressed shock strut having
any part number and serial number identified in paragraph 1.A.,
Effectivity, of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-033, Revision
B, dated June 26, 2012: Within 4,400 flight hours or 24 months after
September 24, 2013 (the effective date of AD 2013-16-08), whichever
occurs first, perform a detailed inspection of the retract actuator
bracket assembly, associated pins, and the mating lugs on the outer
cylinder for evidence of corrosion, in accordance with Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670BA-32-033, Revision B, dated June 26, 2012; and
Goodrich Service Bulletin 49000-32-46 R2, dated November 11, 2011.
Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight (i.e.,
replace retract actuator bracket assembly and pins, or outer
cylinder lugs, as applicable).

(i) Retained Installation of New Jam Nut With No Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD
2013-16-08, Amendment 39-17546 (78 FR 51055, August 20, 2013), with
no changes. For any airplane with an MLG retraction actuator
assembly having any part number and serial number identified in
paragraph 1.A., Effectivity, of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-
32-031, Revision C,

dated April 17, 2012, except airplanes on which modification status
``32-64'' is marked on the identification plate: Within 20,000
flight hours or 10 years after September 24, 2013 (the effective
date of AD 2013-16-08), whichever occurs first, install a new jam
nut having part number 49606-5, in accordance with Part B of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-
031, Revision C, dated April 17, 2012; and Goodrich Service Bulletin
49600-32-64 R3, dated December 15, 2011.

(j) Retained Credit for Previous Actions With Change to Paragraph
(j)(1)(iii) of This AD

    (1) This paragraph restates the credit provided by paragraph
(j)(1) of AD 2013-16-08, Amendment 39-17546 (78 FR 51055, August 20,
2013), with a change to the service information citation in
paragraph (j)(1)(iii) of this AD. This paragraph provides credit for
the actions required by paragraphs (g) and (i) of this AD, if those
actions were performed before September 24, 2013 (the effective date
of AD 2013-16-08), using the service information specified in
paragraph (j)(1)(i), (j)(1)(ii), or (j)(1)(iii) of this AD, which is
not incorporated by reference in this AD.
    (i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-031, dated March 14,
2011.
    (ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-031, Revision A, dated
June 9, 2011.
    (iii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-031, Revision B,
dated July 29, 2011.
    (2) This paragraph restates the credit provided by paragraph
(j)(2) of AD 2013-16-08, Amendment 39-17546 (78 FR 51055, August 20,
2013), with no changes. This paragraph provides credit for the
actions required by paragraph (h) of this AD, if those actions were
performed before September 24, 2013 (the effective date of AD 2013-
16-08), using the service information specified in paragraph
(j)(2)(i) or (j)(2)(ii) of this AD, which is not incorporated by
reference in this AD.
    (i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-033, dated March 14,
2011.
    (ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-033, Revision A, dated
July 29, 2011.

(k) Retained Parts Installation Limitations With Change to Paragraph
(k)(2) of This AD

    (1) This paragraph restates the parts installation limitation
specified in paragraph (k)(1) of AD 2013-16-08, Amendment 39-17546
(78 FR 51055, August 20, 2013), with no changes. As of September 24,
2013 (the effective date of AD 2013-16-08), no person may install on
any airplane an MLG retraction actuator assembly having any part
number and serial number identified in paragraph 1.A., Effectivity,
of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-031, Revision C, dated April
17, 2012, unless that retraction actuator assembly has been
inspected as specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, and all
applicable corrective actions (i.e., replacement of the retract
actuator) specified in paragraph (g) of this AD have been done.
Repeat the inspection specified in paragraph (g) of this AD
thereafter at the intervals specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (2) This paragraph restates the parts installation limitation
specified in paragraph (k)(2) of AD 2013-16-08, Amendment 39-17546
(78 FR 51055, August 20, 2013), with a revised part name. As of the
effective date of this AD, no person may install on any airplane an
MLG dressed shock strut having any part number and serial number
identified in paragraph 1.A., Effectivity, of Bombardier Service
Bulletin 670BA-32-033, Revision B, dated June 26, 2012, unless that
retraction actuator assembly has been inspected and all applicable
corrective actions have been done, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-
033, Revision B, dated June 26, 2012.

(l) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO,
ANE-170, Engine and Propeller Directorate, FAA; or Transport Canada
Civil Aviation (TCCA); or Bombardier's TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must
include the DAO-authorized signature.

(m) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2011-36R1, dated October
3, 2012, for related information. You may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0483-0002.
    (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (n)(4), (n)(5), and (n)(6) of this AD.

(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
September 24, 2013 (78 FR 51055, August 20, 2013).
    (i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-031, Revision C, dated
April 17, 2012.
    (ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-033, Revision B, dated
June 26, 2012.
    (iii) Goodrich Service Bulletin 49000-32-46 R2, dated November
11, 2011.
    (iv) Goodrich Service Bulletin 49600-32-63 R1, dated May 17,
2011.
    (v) Goodrich Service Bulletin 49600-32-64 R3, dated December 15,
2011.
    (4) For Bombardier service information identified in this AD,
contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com.
    (5) For Goodrich service information identified in this AD,
contact Goodrich Corporation, Landing Gear, 1400 South Service Road,
West Oakville L6L 5Y7, Ontario, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.goodrich.com/TechPubs.
    (6) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (7) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 28, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-26437 Filed 11-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: June 12, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 112)]
[Notices]
[Page 28083-28085]
[DOCID:fr12jn09-108]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60046; File No. SR-Phlx--2009-44]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
the Cancellation Fee

June 4, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 1, 2009, NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below,
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to: (i) Increase the Cancellation Fee from
$1.10 per order to $2.10 per order; (ii) modify the Cancellation Fee by
limiting its applicability to cancelled AUTOM-delivered customer orders
instead of all cancelled AUTOM-delivered orders; and (iii) specify the
types of order activity that are exempt from the Cancellation Fee. The
Exchange also proposes to amend an endnote to reflect recently approved
Exchange By-Laws and a Rule.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXPHLX/
Filings/, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the
Cancellation Fee to assist the Exchange in recouping costs associated
with a large number of order cancellations. Specifically, the costs
arise from increased bandwidth and capacity concerns related to
increased message traffic.
    The Exchange proposes to increase the Cancellation Fee from $1.10
per order for each cancelled AUTOM-delivered \3\ order in excess of the
number of orders executed on the Exchange by a member organization in a
given month to $2.10 per order. The Exchange believes this increase
will cover costs to the Exchange associated with system congestion
resulting from a rising number of cancellation orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ AUTOM is the Exchange's electronic order delivery, routing,
execution and reporting system, which provides for the automatic
entry and routing of equity option and index option orders to the
Exchange trading floor. See Exchange Rule 1080. See also proposed
rule change SR-Phlx-2009-32 which proposes to amend Rule 1080 to
state, ``AUTOM and AUTO-X were replaced by the Phlx XL System, such
that references to both terms refer to Phlx XL.'' Therefore, in
light of proposed rule change SR-Phlx-2009-32, references throughout
this rule filing to AUTOM-delivered orders would be referenced as
electronically delivered orders upon the approval of SR-Phlx-2009-
32.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, the Exchange assesses a Cancellation Fee of $ 1.10 per
order on member organizations for each cancelled AUTOM-delivered order
in excess of the number of orders executed on the Exchange by that
member organization in a given month. The Exchange calculates the
Cancellation Fee by aggregating all orders and cancels received by the
Exchange and totaling those orders by member organization. At least 500
cancellations must be made in a given month by a member organization in
order for a member organization to be assessed the Cancellation Fee.
The Cancellation Fee is not assessed in a month in which fewer than 500
AUTOM-delivered orders are cancelled. Simple cancels and cancel-
replacement orders are the types of orders that are counted when
calculating the number of AUTOM-delivered orders.\4\ Also, pre-market
cancellations \5\ are not included in the calculation of the
Cancellation Fee as well as Complex Orders \6\ that are submitted
electronically.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ A cancel-replacement order is a contingency order consisting
of two or more parts which require the immediate cancellation of a
previously received order prior to the replacement of a new order
with new terms and conditions. If the previously placed order is
already filled partially or in its entirety the replacement order is
automatically canceled or reduced by such number. See Exchange Rule
1066(c)(7).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 53226 (February 3,
2006), 71 FR 7602 (February 13, 2006) (SR-Phlx-2005-92); and 53670
(April 18, 2006), 71 FR 21087 (April 24, 2006) (SR-Phlx-2006-21).
    \6\ A Complex Order is composed of two or more option components
and is priced as a single order (a ``Complex Order Strategy'') on a
net debit or net credit basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to modify the Cancellation Fee to limit its
applicability to cancelled AUTOM-delivered customer \7\ orders instead
of all cancelled AUTOM-delivered orders. This proposal would assess the
$2.10

proposed Cancellation Fee on cancelled customer orders that are in
excess of the number of customer orders executed on the Exchange by a
member organization in a given month. The Exchange believes that by
modifying the cancellation calculation to customer orders, the Exchange
would be able to fairly allocate costs among members according to
system use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See e.g. Exchange Rule 1080(b)(i)(A) ``* * * is any order
entered on behalf of a public customer, and does not include any
order entered for the account of a broker-dealer, or any account in
which a broker-dealer or an associated person of a broker-dealer has
any direct or indirect interest.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to amend the types of order activity
that are exempt from the Cancellation Fee. As previously stated,
currently the Cancellation Fee is not assessed in a month in which
fewer than 500 AUTOM-delivered orders are cancelled; only simple
cancels and cancel-replacement orders are the types of orders that are
counted when calculating the number of AUTOM-delivered orders. Also,
currently pre-market cancellations and Complex Orders that are
submitted electronically are not included in the calculation of the
Cancellation Fee.
    The Exchange proposes to continue to exempt fewer than 500 AUTOM-
delivered orders that are cancelled, but proposes to amend that
provision to state that it will exempt fewer than 500 AUTOM-delivered
customer orders that are cancelled in a month. Additionally, the
Exchange proposes to exempt unfilled Immediate-or-Cancel \8\ customer
orders and cancelled customer orders that improved the Exchange's
prevailing bid or offer (PBBO) market at the time the customer orders
were received by the Exchange. The Exchange believes that these types
of order activity should be exempt from the Cancellation Fee because
the activity does not contribute excessively to system congestion. The
pre-market cancellations and Complex Orders that are submitted
electronically will continue to not be included in the calculation of
the Cancellation Fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ An Immediate-or-Cancel (IOC) order is a limit order that is
to be executed in whole or in part upon receipt. Any portion not so
executed shall be cancelled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As previously stated, the Exchange currently exempts these types of
order activities. However, the Exchange proposes to specifically
mention the pre-market cancellation exemption in the Fee Schedule by
noting that pre-market cancellations are exempt.\9\ The Exchange
inadvertently excluded such language from the Fee Schedule in the past
and believes that the addition of such language will clarify the Fee
Schedule. Similarly, the Exchange still believes that the pre-market
cancellation and Complex Order activity do not excessively contribute
to increased order flow traffic.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The Complex Order exemption is currently specified in the
Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange proposes to amend endnote 70 to reflect the
recently approved changes to proposed rules SR-Phlx-2009-23 \10\ and
SR-Phlx-2009-17,\11\ which amended Exchange By-Law Article VI, Sections
11-1 and 11-3 and Exchange Rule 960.9 to rename certain standing
committees and eliminate reference to a Hearing Officer. These proposed
amendments to endnote 70 will conform the endnote to the Exchange's
current By-Laws and Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59924 (May 14,
2009), 74 FR 23759 (May 20, 2009) (SR-Phlx-2009-23).
    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59794 (April 20,
2009), 74 FR 18761 (April 24, 2009) (SR-Phlx-2009-17).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its schedule of
fees is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \12\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \13\ in
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees
and other charges among Exchange members. The Exchange believes that
the proposed amendments to the Cancellation Fee will continue to fairly
allocate costs among members according to system use as well as ease
system congestion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \14\ and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 \15\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2009-44 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2009-44. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2009-44 and should be
submitted on or before July 6, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-13809 Filed 6-11-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: March 25, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 56)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 12646-12648]
[DOCID:fr25mr09-29]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 65

[Docket ID FEMA-2008-0020; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1036]

Changes in Flood Elevation Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Interim rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This interim rule lists communities where modification of the
Base (1 % annual-chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) is appropriate because
of new scientific or technical data. New flood insurance premium rates
will be calculated from the modified BFEs for new buildings and their
contents.

DATES: These modified BFEs are currently in effect on the dates listed
in the table below and revise the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of these changes in a
newspaper of local circulation, any person has ninety (90) days in
which to request through the community that the Mitigation Assistant
Administrator of FEMA reconsider the changes. The modified BFEs may be
changed during the 90-day period.

ADDRESSES: The modified BFEs for each community are available for
inspection at the office of the Chief Executive Officer of each
community. The respective addresses are listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William R. Blanton, Jr., Engineering
Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The modified BFEs are not listed for each
community in this interim rule. However, the address of the Chief
Executive Officer of the community where the modified BFE
determinations are available for inspection is provided.
    Any request for reconsideration must be based on knowledge of
changed conditions or new scientific or technical data.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    For rating purposes, the currently effective community number is
shown and must be used for all new policies and renewals.
    The modified BFEs are the basis for the floodplain management
measures that the community is required to either adopt or to show
evidence of being already in effect in order to qualify or to remain
qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
    These modified BFEs, together with the floodplain management
criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are required.
They should not be construed to mean that the community must change any
existing ordinances that are more stringent in their floodplain
management requirements. The community may at any time enact stricter
requirements of its own, or pursuant to policies established by the
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The changes BFEs are in
accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    National Environmental Policy Act. This interim rule is
categorically excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR part 10,
Environmental Consideration. An environmental impact assessment has not
been prepared.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood elevation determinations are
not within the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
    Regulatory Classification. This interim rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 of September 30, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735.
    Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This interim rule involves no
policies that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism.
    Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This interim rule
meets the applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 65

    Flood insurance, Floodplains, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

0
Accordingly, 44 CFR part 65 is amended to read as follows:

PART 65--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 65 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp., p. 376.

Sec.  65.4   [Amended]

0
2. The tables published under the authority of Sec.  65.4 are amended
as follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Date and name of
         State and county           Location and case No.     newspaper where     Chief executive officer   Effective date of  modification   Community
                                                           notice was published         of community                                             No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama: St. Clair................  Town of Moody (08-04-  January 9, 2009;      The Honorable Joe Lee,     May 18, 2009...................       010187
                                     4404P).                January 16, 2009;     Mayor, Town of Moody,
                                                            The Birmingham News.  670 Park Avenue, Moody,
                                                                                AL 35004.
Arizona:
    Maricopa......................  Unincorporated areas   December 25, 2008;    The Honorable Andrew W.    May 4, 2009....................       040037
                                     of Maricopa County     January 1, 2009;      Kunasek, Chairman,
                                     (08-09-1420P).         Arizona Business      Maricopa County, Board
                                                            Gazette.              of Supervisors301 West
                                                                                Jefferson, 10th Floor,
                                                                                Phoenix, AZ 85003.
    Pinal.........................  City of Apache         January 12, 2009;     The Honorable Douglas      May 19, 2009...................       040120
                                     Junction (08-09-       January 19, 2009;     Coleman, Mayor, City of
                                     1318P).                Apache Junction       Apache Junction, 300
                                                            News.                 East Superstition
                                                                                Boulevard, Apache
                                                                                Junction, AZ 85219.
California: Monterey..............  City of Salinas (08-   January 12, 2009;     The Honorable Dennis       May 19, 2009...................       060202
                                     09-1361P).             January 19, 2009;     Donohue, Mayor, City of
                                                            The Salinas           Salinas, 200 Lincoln
                                                            Californian.          Avenue, Salinas, CA
                                                                                93901.

Colorado: Jefferson...............  Unincorporated areas   January 7, 2009;      The Honorable Kathy        May 14, 2009...................       080087
                                     of Jefferson County    January 14, 2009;     Hartman, Chairman,
                                     (08-08-0667P).         High Timber Times.    Jefferson County, Board
                                                                                of Commissioners, 100
                                                                                Jefferson County
                                                                                Parkway, Golden, CO
                                                                                80419-5550.
Florida:
    Lake..........................  Town of Lady Lake (08- January 12, 2009;     The Honorable Jim          January 30, 2009...............       120613
                                     04-5093P).             January 19, 2009;     Richards, Mayor, Town of
                                                            The Villages Daily    Lady Lake, 409 Fennell
                                                            Sun.                  Boulevard, Lady Lake, FL
                                                                                32159.
    Miami-Dade....................  City of Coral Gables   January 12, 2009;     The Honorable Don          December 31, 2008..............       120639
                                     (09-04-0251P).         January 20, 2009;     Slesnick, II, Mayor,
                                                            Miami Daily           City of Coral Gables,
                                                            Business Review.      405 Biltmore Way, Second
                                                                                Floor, Coral Gables, FL
                                                                                33134.
Georgia: Barrow...................  Unincorporated areas   January 7, 2009;      Mr. Douglas H. Garrison,   May 14, 2009...................       130497
                                     of Barrow County (08-  January 14, 2009;     Chairman, Barrow County,
                                     04-5850P).             The Barrow County     Board of Commissioners,
                                                            News.                 233 East Broad Street,
                                                                                Winder, GA 30680.
Illinois:
    DuPage........................  Unincorporated areas   March 7, 2008; March  The Honorable Robert J.    July 14, 2008..................       170197
                                     of DuPage County (08-  14, 2008; Daily       Schillerstorm, Chairman,
                                     05-0519P).             Herald.               DuPage County Board, 505
                                                                                North County Farm Road,
                                                                                Wheaton, IL 60187.
    DuPage........................  City of Elmhurst (08-  March 7, 2008; March  The Honorable Thomas D.    July 14, 2008..................       170205
                                     05-0519P).             14, 2008; Daily       Marcucci, Mayor, City of
                                                            Herald.               Elmhurst, 209 North York
                                                                                Street, Elmhurst, IL
                                                                                60126.
Kansas: Pottawatomie..............  Unincorporated areas   January 8, 2009;      The Honorable Corwin       May 15, 2009...................       200621
                                     of Pottawatomie        January 15, 2009;     Seamans, Chairman,
                                     County (08-07-1722P).  The Wamego Times.     Pottawatomie County
                                                                                Commissioners, 207 North
                                                                                First Street,
                                                                                Westmoreland, KS 66549.
Missouri: St. Charles.............  Unincorporated areas   January 12, 2009;     The Honorable Steve        May 19, 2009...................       290315
                                     of St. Charles         January 19, 2009;     Ehlmann, County
                                     County (09-07-0032P).  St. Charles County    Executive, St. Charles
                                                            Business Record.      County, Administration
                                                                                Building, 201 North
                                                                                Second Street, St.
                                                                                Charles, MO 63301.
New Jersey:
    Somerset......................  Borough of Bound       January 9, 2009;      The Honorable Carey        December 24, 2008..............       340430
                                     Brook (09-02-0051P).   January 16, 2009;     Pilato, Mayor, Borough
                                                            Courier News.         of Bound Brook, 230
                                                                                Hamilton Street, Bound
                                                                                Brook, NJ 08805.
    Somerset......................  Township of            January 9, 2009;      The Honorable Patricia     December 24, 2008..............       340432
                                     Bridgewater (09-02-    January 16, 2009;     Flannery, Mayor,
                                     0051P).                Courier News.         Township of Bridgewater,
                                                                                P.O. Box 6300,
                                                                                Bridgewater, NJ 08807.
North Carolina: Onslow............  City of Jacksonville   December 23, 2008;    The Honorable Sammy        January 14, 2009...............       370178
                                     (08-04-3999P).         December 30, 2008;    Phillips, Mayor, City of
                                                            The Daily News.       Jacksonville, P.O. Box
                                                                                128, Jacksonville, NC
                                                                                28541.
Oklahoma:
    Oklahoma......................  Town of Arcadia (08-   January 7, 2009;      The Honorable Marilyn      December 23, 2008..............       400551
                                     06-2651P).             January 14, 2009;     Murrell, Mayor, Town of
                                                            The Oklahoman.        Arcadia, P.O. Box 268,
                                                                                Arcadia, OK 73004.
    Tulsa.........................  City of Broken Arrow   January 9, 2009;      The Honorable Wade         December 24, 2008..............       400236
                                     (08-06-2075P).         January 16, 2009;     McCaleb, Mayor, City of
                                                            Tulsa Daily           Broken Arrow, P.O. Box
                                                            Commerce & Legal      610, Broken Arrow, OK
                                                            News.                 74013.
Pennsylvania: Allegheny...........  Municipality of        January 12, 2009;     The Honorable Gregory      December 31, 2008..............       420054
                                     Monroeville (09-03-    January 19, 2009;     Rosenko, Mayor,
                                     0036P).                Pittsburgh Post       Municipality of
                                                            Gazette.              Monroeville, 2700
                                                                                Monroeville Boulevard,
                                                                                Monroeville, PA 15146.
Puerto Rico: Puerto Rico..........  Commonwealth of        January 9, 2009;      The Honorable Anibal       May 18, 2009...................       720000
                                     Puerto Rico (08-02-    January 16, 2009;     Acevedo-Vila, Governor,
                                     1455P).                Puerto Rico Daily     Commonwealth of Puerto
                                                            Sun.                  Rico, P.O. Box 82, La
                                                                                Fortaleza, San Juan, PR
                                                                                00901.
Tennessee: Rutherford.............  City of Murfreesboro   January 11, 2009;     The Honorable Tommy        May 18, 2009...................       470168
                                     (08-04-3762P).         January 18, 2009;     Bragg, Mayor, City of
                                                            The Murfreesboro      Murfreesboro, 111 West
                                                            Post.                 Vine Street,
                                                                                Murfreesboro, TN 37130.
Texas:
    Bexar.........................  City of San Antonio    January 12, 2009;     The Honorable Phil         May 19, 2009...................       480045
                                     (08-06-0269P).         January 19, 2009;     Hardberger, Mayor, City
                                                            San Antonio Express   of San Antonio, P.O. Box
                                                            News.                 839966, San Antonio, TX
                                                                                78283.
    Caldwell......................  Unincorporated areas   October 9, 2008;      The Honorable H.T.         February 20, 2009..............       480094
                                     of Caldwell County     October 16, 2008;     Wright, Caldwell County
                                     (07-06-2617P).         Lockhart Post         Judge, 110 South Main
                                                            Register.             Street, Lockhart, TX
                                                                                78644.
    Caldwell......................  Town of Martindale     October 9, 2008;      The Honorable Patricia     February 20, 2009..............       481587
                                     (07-06-2617P).         October 16, 2008;     Peterson, Mayor, Town of
                                                            Lockhart Post         Martindale, P.O. Box
                                                            Register.             365, Martindale, TX
                                                                                78655.
    Dallas........................  City of Garland (08-   January 5, 2009;      The Honorable Ronald E.    May 12, 2009...................       485471
                                     06-0905P).             January 12, 2009;     Jones, Mayor, City of
                                                            Dallas Morning News.  Garland, P.O. Box
                                                                                469002, Garland, TX
                                                                                75046-9002.
    Fort Bend.....................  Fort Bend County       January 9, 2009;      The Honorable Ellen        December 31, 2008..............       481590
                                     M.U.D. 23     January 16, 2009;     Hughes, Board President,
                                     (08-06-2237P).         Fort Bend Herald.     Fort Bend County
                                                                                Municipal Utility
                                                                                District No. 23, 1715
                                                                                Misty Fawn Lane, Fresno,
                                                                                TX 77545.

    Guadalupe.....................  Unincorporated areas   October 16, 2008;     The Honorable Mike         February 20, 2009..............       480266
                                     of Guadalupe County    October 23, 2008;     Wiggins, Guadalupe
                                     (07-06-2617P).         Seguin Gazette        County Judge, 307 West
                                                            Enterprise.           Court Street, Seguin,
                                                                                Texas 78155.
    Harris........................  Unincorporated areas   January 9, 2009;      The Honorable Ed Emmett,   January 30, 2009...............       480287
                                     of Harris County (08-  January 16, 2009;     Harris County Judge,
                                     06-2044P).             Houston Chronicle.    1001 Preston Street,
                                                                                Suite 911, Houston, TX
                                                                                77002.
    Hays..........................  Unincorporated areas   October 16, 2008;     The Honorable Liz Sumter,  February 20, 2009..............       480321
                                     of Hays County (07-    October 23, 2008;     Hays County Judge, 111
                                     06-2617P).             San Marcos Daily      East San Antonio Street,
                                                            Record.               Suite 300, San Marcos,
                                                                                TX 78666.
    McLennan......................  Unincorporated areas   January 9, 2009;      The Honorable Jim Lewis,   May 18, 2009...................       480456
                                     of McLennan County     January 16, 2009;     McLennan County Judge,
                                     (09-06-0208P).         Waco Tribune-Herald.  P.O. Box 1728, Waco, TX
                                                                                76701.
    McLennan......................  City of Waco (09-06-   January 9, 2009;      The Honorable Virginia     May 18, 2009...................       480461
                                     0208P).                January 16, 2009;     Dupuy, Mayor, City of
                                                            Waco Tribune-Herald.  Waco, P.O. Box 2570,
                                                                                Waco, TX 76702.
    Tarrant.......................  Unincorporated areas   January 9, 2009;      The Honorable B. Glen      May 18, 2009...................       480582
                                     of Tarrant County      January 16, 2009;     Whitley, Tarrant County
                                     (08-06-1292P).         Commercial Recorder.  Judge, 100 East
                                                                                Weatherford Street, Fort
                                                                                Worth, TX 76196.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: February 6, 2009.
Michael K. Buckley,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Mitigation Directorate, Department of
Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-6575 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-12-P