[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15039-15041]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6325]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Commercial Space Transportation Grants Program

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request for grant proposals for the Commercial Space
Transportation Grant Program.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice solicits Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 grant proposals to
continue the development of a Commercial Space Transportation
infrastructure system, which supports the National Space Policy and
Congressional intent. Begun in 2010, the program supports the
Commercial Space Transportation industry by identification,
prioritization, and funding for Commercial Space Transportation
infrastructure projects.
    It must be noted that with the FY 2011 Congressional appropriation
not yet enacted, the FAA's Office of Commercial Space Transportation
(AST) does not currently have funding for the Commercial Space
Transportation Grants Program. Should there be an appropriation for the
Commercial Space Transportation Grants Program; the FAA/AST intends to
swiftly execute grant awards within FY 2011. To facilitate this, the
FAA/AST is requesting grant applications at this time. The FAA/AST
intends to receive, process, and evaluate the applications in a timely
manner, and in accordance with the notional schedule listed below, so
should there be an appropriation, the recipients will already be
selected and the awards can be made within FY 2011. There remains the
possibility that no funds will be appropriated in FY 2011 for the
Commercial Space Transportation Grants Program. If no funds are
appropriated, no grant applications submitted in response to this
Notice will be approved and funded.
    Due to time constraints, this Notice will be the only solicitation
made for FY 2011 projects and proposals. The FAA/AST will review and
evaluate all applications for a grant received by the deadline,
pursuant to 49 United States Code (U.S.C.) Chapter 703 (to be
recodified at 51 U.S.C. Chapter 511). The FAA/AST may make one or more
grant awards based upon its evaluations of the submissions. All grants
awarded under the Commercial Space Transportation Grants Program are
discretionary awards. Projects to be funded under the Commercial Space
Transportation Grants Program must carry out commercial space
transportation infrastructure development, as defined in 49 U.S.C.
70301 (to be recodified as 51 U.S.C. 51101).

DATES: In order for the FAA/AST to award funds (if appropriated) prior
to the end of FY 2011, the following notional schedule is provided.

Submission Open Period Opens: March 18, 2011
Submission Open Period Closes: May 13, 2011
Review and Approval Period: May 16, 2011 thru June 30, 2011
Announcement: July 15, 2011

ADDRESSES: Applicants can get more information about the Commercial
Space Transportation Grants Program, to include a checklist for the
submission package, by:
    1. Accessing the Office of Commercial Space Transportation website
at: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast; or
    2. Contacting Glenn Rizner or Julie Price, AST-100, for program
questions; or
    3. Contacting Greg Carter, AGC-510, for legal questions.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Office              Fax                         E-mail
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Rizner.......................<PHONE_NUMBER><PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Julie Price........................<PHONE_NUMBER><PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Greg Carter........................<PHONE_NUMBER><PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Commercial Space Transportation Grants Program is intended to
``ensure the resiliency of the space transportation infrastructure in
the United States.'' To help further establish United States'
Commercial Space Transportation-related goals, Congress established a
Space Transportation Infrastructure Grants Program codified under 49
U.S.C. Chapter 703--Space Transportation Infrastructure Matching
Grants. Congressional authorization was established FY 1994 for the use
of Federal monies to fund up to fifty percent (50%) of total project
cost in conjunction with state and local government funding. The
legislation also requires a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the total
project cost come from private funding. The first Congressional
appropriation for the Commercial Space Transportation Grants Program
came in FY 2010.
    The FAA/AST reviews, evaluates, and oversees the Commercial Space
Transportation Grants Program. Notionally, the award of the grant
monies will be on or about July 15, 2011. To meet this award date,
applicants must submit their grant proposals on or before May 13, 2011.
Additional information related to the Commercial Space Transportation
Grants Program can be found at the Office of Commercial Space
Transportation website or by contacting one of the Points of Contacts;
this information is listed above.

The Commercial Space Transportation Grants Program

    To meet the intent of the program, development projects eligible
for funding include:
    1. Technical and environmental studies; or
    2. Construction, improvement, design, and engineering of space
transportation infrastructure (including facilities and associated
equipment).
    The Commercial Space Transportation Grants Program will not fund
more than 50% of the total project cost, and project financing must
include a private component of at least 10% of the total project cost.
    Given that the FAA/AST may award multiple grants, applicants may
submit multiple grant proposals, provided they are for separate
projects and meet the matching requirements independently.

Environmental Requirements

    Approval of grant funding is a major federal action subject to
review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq., as implemented by the regulations of the Council
on Environmental Quality at 40 CFR part 1500 and FAA Order 1050.1E, and
other Federal environmental laws. Because of this, the FAA anticipates
that it may be most cost-effective for applicants who have already
undergone NEPA review to apply for a grant this fiscal year.
    In order for a launch site to receive a license to operate, a NEPA
review will already have been conducted. The launch site operator could
seek a grant for projects that the FAA considered as part of that
license. Although having a license is not a requirement for a grant
award, the environmental requirements may already be met for launch
sites with a license.
    Under 49 U.S.C. 70304 (to be recodified as 51 U.S.C. 51104),
infrastructure development projects selected for a Commercial Space
Transportation Grant must meet three additional environmental
requirements:
    1. The project must provide for the protection and enhancement of
the natural resources and the quality of the environment of the United
States. Specifically, if a project will have a significant, adverse
environmental impact, the FAA/AST shall approve the grant application
only after finding that no feasible and prudent alternative to the
project exists and that all reasonable steps have been taken to
minimize the adverse effect.
    2. The sponsor must certify that an opportunity for a public
hearing has been provided to consider the economic, social, and
environmental impacts of the project and its consistency with the goals
of any planning carried out by the community.
    3. The Governor of the State in which the project is located, or
his/her designee, must certify that there is reasonable assurance the
project will be located, designed, constructed, and operated to comply
with applicable air and water quality standards.
    Planning projects, such as technical and environmental studies,
normally qualify for categorical exclusion (CATEX) under NEPA and would
not trigger the requirements listed above. If, the project normally
qualifies for a CATEX from environmental review, the grant proposal
should reference the relevant paragraph in FAA Order 1050.1E, Policies
and Procedures from Considering Environmental Impacts, and address
whether extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of
an environmental assessment (EA) or environmental impact statement
(EIS).
    For more details about the environmental review for commercial
space transportation activities, please see Guidelines for Compliance
with the National Environmental Policy Act and Related Environmental
Review Statutes for the Licensing of Commercial Launches and Launch
Sites at http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/environmental/review.

Who May Apply for a Commercial Space Transportation Grant

    The FAA/AST may make project grant awards to ``sponsors,'' per 49
U.S.C. 70302 (to be recodified as 51 U.S.C. 51102). Per 49 U.S.C.
70301(6) (to be recodified as 51 U.S.C. 51101(6)), a ``sponsor'' is a
public agency that submits an application for a project grant. Per 49
U.S.C. 70301(5) (to be recodified as 51 U.S.C. 51101(5)), a ``public
agency'' is a State or agency of a State, a political subdivision of a
State, or a tax-supported organization.

Grant Award

    The FAA/AST intends to award Commercial Space Transportation Grants
on or about July 15, 2011. An FAA/AST grant offer letter may contain
requirements for assurances to ensure the grants are consistent with 49
U.S.C. Chapter 703 (to be recodified as 51 U.S.C. Chapter 511).

How To Apply for a Commercial Space Transportation Grant

    The application submission must include the following:
    1. Cover letter, signed by public agency senior official,
demonstrating the legal authority to engage in the project.
    2. Detail as to how the proposed grant project meets the
requirements of Chapter 703 (recodified as Chapter 703):

    a. Documentation demonstrating authority as a public agency.
    b. Demonstration that the grant will not be for more than 50% of
the total cost of the project.
    c. Letter(s) of Commitment from the private sector for at least 10%
of the total cost of the project
    d. Detailed description of the project
    e. Contributions to capabilities that serve the United States'
space transportation needs
    f. Impacts on the competitiveness of the United States space
transportation industry
    g. Discussion of environmental considerations, if applicable
    3. Consent from the head of the appropriate agency, should the
project use Government property (land, equipment, etc.)
    4. SF-424, Application for Federal Assistance (OMB Number 4040-
0004)
    5. One of the following:
    a. SF-424A for non-construction proposals
    b. SF-424C for construction proposals
    The forms request specific applicant information, project
information, and an estimate of the funding and duration of the
project. They are available at http://www.grants.gov.
    Applicants for the Commercial Space Transportation Grants Program
must submit grant applications to the FAA/AST. Applicants must submit
an original copy of the completed grant proposal, plus four additional
copies. One copy (not the original) may be submitted electronically to
Mr. Glenn Rizner at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and Ms. Julie Price at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>however the original and additional copies must be
submitted to: Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Commercial
Space Transportation, AST-100, c/o Mr. Glenn Rizner or Ms. Julie Price,
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Suite 325, Washington, DC 20591.
    Should one copy be submitted electronically, a time stamp will be
recorded for the submission. The original and all other copies must
reach the office on or before 12 p.m. (noon), Eastern Time, Friday, May
13, 2011. Should no copy be submitted electronically, the original and
additional copies still must reach the office on or before 12 p.m.
(noon), Eastern Time, Friday, May 13, 2011. There will be no allowance
for extensions of time.
    Previously submitted grant applications do not carry over and will
not be considered. Applicants must resubmit past projects for
consideration in the new fiscal year.

     Issued in Washington, DC, March 10, 2011.
George C. Nield,
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2011-6325 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:	Technical Support Document for Approval of a Missouri State Implementation Plan Revision relating to Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions From Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations Processes in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry

FROM:		Jason Heitman
			ARD/AQPB/ATPS

TO:			EPA-R07-OAR-2022-0236; MO-431

THROUGH: 		Andy Hawkins, Branch Chief
			ARD/AQPB
SUMMARY:
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions to the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP). The EPA received the Missouri Department of Natural Resources' (MoDNR) SIP revision submission on February 11, 2020.
Specifically, the revisions are to a state rule at Title 10, Division 10 of the Code of State Regulations (CSR)- 10 CSR 10-5.550, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions From Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations Processes in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry, which is SIP approved at 40 CFR § 52.1320(c). The purpose of the state regulation is to limit volatile organic compound emissions from reactor processes and distillation operations in the St. Louis 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment area.
These proposed revisions amend the rule applicability section for sources subject to this rule, remove unnecessary words, update incorporations by reference, amend definitions specific to this rule, update test and reference methods, and make other minor edits.
RULE REVISIONS:
Below is EPA's description of the changes made to each rule section and the text of the revised rule.
Revisions that are additions to MoDNR's existing approved SIP rule text are bold. Revisions that are deletions to the existing approved SIP rule text are stricken through. The rule text with changes is listed first and is followed by a summary of the EPA's review of the changes.

10 CSR 10-5.550 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions From Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations Processes in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry

(1) Applicability.

(A) The provisions of this rule apply to any vent stream originating from a process unit in which with a reactor process or distillation operations is located in St. Louis City and Jefferson, St. Charles, Franklin and St. Louis Counties existing on February 29, 2000.

(B) Exemptions from the provisions of this rule are as follows:

      1. Any reactor process or distillation operation that is designed and operated in a batch mode is not subject to the provisions of this rule;

      2. Any reactor process or distillation operation that is part of a polymer manufacturing operation is not subject to the provisions of this rule;

      3. Any reactor process or distillation operation operating in a process unit with a total design capacity of less than one (1) gigagram (1,100 tons) per year for all chemicals produced within that unit is not subject to the provisions of this rule except for the reporting and recordkeeping requirements listed in subsection (4)(D) of this rule; and

      4. Any vent stream for a reactor process or distillation operation with a flow rate less than 0.0085 standard cubic meter per minute or a total volatile organic compound (VOC) concentration less than five hundred (500) parts per million by volume is not subject to the provisions of this rule except for the performance testing requirement listed in subparagraph (3)(B)3.B., paragraph (3)(B)9. And the reporting and recordkeeping requirements listed in subsection (4)(C) of this rule.

(C) In the event that other rules in Title 10 Division 10 of the Code of State Regulations are also applicable to reactor processes and distillation operation processes in the chemical manufacturing industry, the more stringent rule shall apply applies.

EPA Analysis:  The revision to the applicability date in section (1) incorporates the effective date of the rule when promulgated in the SIP by EPA as meeting the ozone reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements for existing sources at the time of promulgation of the original rule. The revisions to include the relevant counties in section (1) merely restate the applicable geographic location because this rule is part of Chapter 5 of Missouri's Code of State Regulations, titled "Chapter 5 -- Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Rules Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan Area." Based on EPA's analysis,  EPA finds the revisions in section (1) do not affect the stringency of the SIP.

(2) Definitions.

(A) Batch mode -- A noncontinuous operation or process in which a discrete quantity or batch of feed is charged into a process unit and distilled or reacted at one time.

(B) Boiler -- Any enclosed combustion device that extracts useful energy in the form of steam.

(C) By compound -- By individual stream components, not carbon equivalents.

(D) Continuous recorder -- A data recording device recording an instantaneous data value at least once every fifteen (15) minutes.

(E) Distillation operation -- An operation separating one or more feed stream(s) into two(2) or more exit stream(s), each exit stream having component concentration different from those in the feed stream(s). The separation is achieved by the redistribution of the components between the liquid and vapor-phase as they approach equilibrium within the distillation unit.
(F) Distillation unit -- A device or vessel in which distillation operations occur, including all associated internals (such as trays or packing) and accessories (such as reboiler, condenser, vacuum pump, stream jet, etc.), plus any associated recovery system.

(G) Flame zone -- The portion of the combustion chamber in a boiler occupied by the flame envelope.

(H) Flow indicator -- A device that indicates whether gas flow is present in a vent stream.

(I) Halogenated vent stream -- Any vent stream determined to have a total concentration of halogen atoms (by volume) contained in organic compounds of two hundred (200) parts per million by volume or greater determined by Method 18 of 40 CFR part 60, Appendix A, as specified in 10 CSR 10-6.030(22), or other test or data validated by Method 301 or of 40 CFR part 63, Appendix A, or by engineering assessment or process knowledge that no halogenated organic compounds are present. Method 301 of 40 CFR 63, Appendix A, promulgated as of July 1, 2018 is hereby incorporated by reference in this rule, as published by the Office of the Federal Register. Copies can be obtained from the U.S. Publishing Office Bookstore, 710 N. Capitol Street NW, Washington DC 20401. This rule does not incorporate any subsequent amendments or additions. For example, one hundred fifty (150) parts per million by volume of ethylene dichloride would contain three hundred (300) parts per million by volume of total halogen atoms.

EPA Analysis:  The revisions to section (2)(I) are administrative in nature and do not affect the stringency of the SIP.

(J) Incinerator -- Any enclosed combustion device that is used for destroying organic compounds. Auxiliary fuel may be used to heat waste gas to combustion temperatures. Any energy recovery section present is not physically formed into one section; rather, the energy recovery system is a separate section following the combustion section and the two are joined by ducting or connections that carry fuel gas.

(K) Primary fuel -- The fuel that provides the principal heat input to the device. To be considered primary, the fuel must be able to sustain operation without the addition of other fuels.

(L) Process heater -- A device that transfers heat liberated by burning fuel to fluids contained in tubes, including all fluids except water that is heated to produce steam.

(M) Process unit -- Equipment assembled and connected by pipes or ducts to produce, as intermediates or final products, one or more SOCMI chemicals (see included in Appendix A of Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations Processes in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry, EPA-450/4-91-031, incorporated by reference). Appendix A of Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations Processes in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry, EPA-450/4-91-031 promulgated August 1993 is hereby incorporated by reference in this rule. Copies can be obtained from the National Service Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP), P.O. Box 42419, Cincinnati, Ohio 45242-0419. A process unit can operate independently if supplied with sufficient feed or raw materials and sufficient product storage facilities.

EPA Analysis:  The revisions to section (2)(M) are administrative in nature and do not affect the stringency of the SIP.

(N) Product -- Any compound or SOCMI chemical (see Appendix A of Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations Processes in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry, EPA-450/4-91-031, as incorporated by
reference in subsection (2)(M) of this rule) that is produced as that chemical for sales as a product, by-product, co-product, or intermediate or for use in the production of other chemicals or compounds.

EPA Analysis:  The revisions to section (2)(N) are administrative in nature and do not affect the stringency of the SIP.

(O) Reactor processes -- Unit operations in which one or more chemicals, or reactants other than air, are combined or decomposed in such a way that their molecular structures are altered and one or more new organic compounds are formed.

(P) Recovery device -- An individual unit of equipment, such as an adsorber, carbon adsorber, or condenser, capable of and used for the purpose of recovering chemicals for use, reuse, or sale.

(Q) Recovery system -- An individual recovery device or series of such devices applied to the same vent stream.

(R) Total organic compounds or "TOC" -- Those compounds measured according to the procedures of Method 18 of 40 CFR part 60, Appendix A. For the purposes of measuring molar compositions as required in subparagraph (3)(B)3.D.; hourly emissions rate as required in subparagraph (3)(B)5.D. and paragraph (3)(B)2.; and TOC concentration as required in paragraph (4)(A)4. The definition of TOC excluded those compounds that the Administrator designates as having negligible photochemical reactivity. The Administrator has designated
the following organic compounds negligibly reactive: methane; ethane; 1,1,1-trichloroethane; methylene chloride; trichlorofluoromethane; dichlorodifluoromethane; chlorodifluoromethane; trifluoromethane; trichlorotrifluoroethane; dichlorotetrafluoroethane; and chloropentafluoroethane.

(S) Total resource effectiveness index value or "TRE index value" -- A measure of the supplemental total resource requirement per unit reduction of organic hazardous air pollutants associated with a process vent stream, based on vent stream flow rate, emission rate of volatile organic compound, net heating value, and corrosion properties (whether or not the vent stream contains halogenated compounds) as quantified by the given equations. The TRE index is a
decision tool used to determine if the annual cost of controlling a given vent gas stream is acceptable when considering the emissions reduction achieved.

(T) Vent stream -- Any gas stream discharge directly from a distillation operation or reactor process to the atmosphere or indirectly to the atmosphere after diversion through other process equipment. The vent stream excludes relief valve discharges and equipment leaks including, but not limited to pumps, compressors, and valves.

(U) Definitions of certain terms specified in this rule, other than those specified in this rule section, may be found in 10 CSR 10-6.020.

(3) General Provisions.

(A) Control Requirements.

      1. For individual vent streams within a process unit with a TRE index value less than or equal to one (1.0), the owner or operator shall--

      A. Reduce emissions of TOC (less methane and ethane) by ninety-eight (98) weight-percent, or to twenty (20) parts per million by volume, on a dry basis corrected to three percent (3%) oxygen, whichever is less stringent. If a boiler or process heater is used to comply with this paragraph, then the vent stream shall be introduced into the flame zone of the boiler or process heater; or

      B. Combust emissions in a flare. Flares used to comply with this paragraph shall comply with the requirements of 40 CFR 60.18. 40 CFR 60.18 promulgated as of July 1, 2018 is hereby incorporated by reference in this rule, as published by the Office of the Federal
Register. Copies can be obtained from the U.S. Publishing Office Bookstore, 710 N. Capitol Street NW, Washington DC 20401. The flare operation requirement does not apply if a process, not subject to this rule, vents an emergency relief discharge into a common flare
header and causes the flare servicing the process subject to this rule to be out of compliance with one or more of the provisions of the flare operation rule.

      2. For each individual vent stream(s) within a process unit with a TRE index value greater than one (1.0), the owner or operator shall maintain vent stream parameters that result in a calculated total resource effectiveness greater than one (1.0) without the use of a volatile organic compound control device. The TRE index shall be calculated at the outlet of the final recovery device.

EPA Analysis:  The revisions to section (3)(A) are administrative in nature and do not affect the stringency of the SIP.

(B) Total Resource Effectiveness Determination, Performance Testing, and Exemption Testing.

      1. For the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the TRE index value in paragraph (3)(A)2. of this rule, engineering assessment may be used to determine process vent stream flow rate, net heating value, and TOC emission rate for the representative operating condition expected to yield the lowest TRE index value.

      A. If the TRE value calculated using such engineering assessment and the TRE equation in subparagraph (3)(B)6.A. of this rule is greater than four (4.0), then it is not recommended that the owner or operator perform the measures specified in paragraph (3)(B)5. of this rule,

      B. If the TRE value calculated using such engineering assessment and the TRE equation in subparagraph (3)(B)6.A. of this rule is less than or equal to four (4.0), then it is recommended that the owner or operator perform the measurements specified in paragraph (3)(B)5. of this rule.

      C. Engineering assessment includes, but is not limited to, the following:

      (I) Previous test results proved the test are representative of current operating practices at the process unit;

      (II) Bench-scale or pilot-scale test data representative of the process under representative operating conditions;

      (III) Maximum flow rate specified or implied within a permit limit applicable to the process vent;

      (IV) Design analysis based on accepted chemical engineering principles, measurable process parameters, or physical or chemical laws or properties. Examples for analytical methods include, but are not limited to --

      (a) Use of material balances based on process stoichiometry to estimate maximum VOC concentration;

      (b) Estimation of maximum flow rate based on physical equipment design such as pump or blower capacities;

      (c) Estimation of TOC concentrations based on saturation conditions; and

      (d) Estimation of maximum expected net heating value based on the stream concentration of each organic compound, or, alternatively, as if all TOC in the stream were the compound with the highest heating value; and

      (V) All data, assumptions, and procedures used in the engineering assessment shall be documented.

      2. For the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the control requirements of this rule, the process unit shall be run at representative operating conditions and flow rates during any performance test.

      3. The following methods in 40 CFR part 60, Appendix A, as specified in 10 CSR 10-6.030(22), shall be used demonstrate compliance with the emission limit or percent reduction efficiency requirement listed in subparagraph (3)(A)1.A. of this rule:

EPA Analysis:  Because the added reference in section (3)(B)3. is already SIP-approved, EPA finds that this revision does not affect the stringency of the SIP.

      A. Method 1 or 1A, as appropriate, for selection of the sampling sites. The control device inlet sampling site for determination of vent stream molar composition or TOC (less methane and ethane) reduction efficiency shall be located after the last recovery device but prior to the inlet of the control device, prior to any dilution of the process vent stream, and prior to release to the atmosphere;

      B. Method 2, 2A, 2C, or 2D, as appropriate, for determination of gas stream volumetric flow rate;

      C. The emission rate correction factor, integrated sampling, and analysis procedure of Method 3 to determine the oxygen concentration (% O2d) for the purpose of determining compliance with the twenty (20) parts per million by volume limit. The sampling site shall be the
same as that of the TOC samples, and samples shall be taken during the same time that the TOC samples are taken. The TOC concentration corrected to three percent (3%) oxygen (Cc) shall be computed using the following equation:

                  17.9
      Cc = CTOC x (  --  --  --  --  --  --  )
                 20.9 - % O2d

where:
      Cc = Concentration of TOC (minus methane and ethane) corrected to three percent (3%) O2, dry basis, parts per million by volume.

      CTOC = Concentration of TOC (minus methane and ethane), dry basis, parts per million by volume; and

      % O2d = Concentration of oxygen, dry basis, percent by volume;

      D. Method 18 to determine the concentration of TOC (less methane and ethane) at the outlet of the control device when determining compliance with the twenty (20) parts per million by volume limit, or at both the control device inlet and outlet when the reduction efficiency of the control device is to be determined.

      (I) The minimum sampling time for each run shall be one (1) hour in which either an integrated sample or four (4) grab samples shall be taken. If grab sampling is used then the samples shall be taken at fifteen (15) minute intervals.

      (II) The emission reduction (R) of TOC (less methane and ethane) shall be determined using the following equation:

            Ei - Eo
      R =  --  --  --  --  --  --  x 100
                    Ei

where:

      R = Emission reduction, percent by weight.

      Ei = Mass rate of TOC (minus methane and ethane) entering the control device, kilogram TOC per hour.

      Eo = Mass rate of TOC (minus methane and ethane) discharged to the atmosphere, kilogram TOC per hour.

      (III) The mass rates of TOC (Ei, Eo) shall be computed using the following equations:

            n
      Ei = K2 (3CijMij) Qi
            j=1;

      and

            n
      Eo = K2 (3CojMoj) Qo
            j=1

where:

      Cij, Coj = Concentration of sample component "j" of the gas stream at the inlet and outlet of the control device, respectively, dry basis, parts per million by volume.

      Mij, Moj = Molecular weight of sample component "j" of the gas stream at the inlet and outlet of the control device, respectively, grams per gram-mole.

      Qi, Qo = Flow rate of gas stream at the inlet and outlet of the control device, respectively, dry standard cubic meters per minute.

      K2 = 2.494 x 10-6 (liters per minute) (gram-mole per standard cubic meter)(kilogram per gram)(minute per hour), where standard temperature for (gram-mole per standard cubic meter) is twenty degrees Celsius (20[o]C); and

      n = Number of components in the sample.

      (IV) The TOC concentration (CTOC) is the sum of the individual components and shall be computed for each run using the following equation:

            n
      CTOC = Σ Cj
            j=1

where:

      CTOC = Concentration of TOC (minus methane and ethane), dry basis, parts per million by volume;

      Cj = Concentration of sample component "j", dry basis, parts per million by volume; and

      n = Number of components in the sample; and

      E. When a boiler or process heater with a design heat input capacity of forty-four (44) megawatts or greater, or a boiler or process heater into which the process vent stream is introduced with the primary fuel, is used to comply with the control requirements, an
initial performance test is not required.

      4. When a flare is used to comply with the control requirements of this rule, the flare shall comply with the requirements of 40 CFR part 60.18.

      5. The following test methods shall be used to determine compliance with the TRE index value:

      A. Method 1 or 1A, as appropriate, for selection of the sampling site.

      (I) The sampling site for the vent stream molar composition determination and flow rate prescribed in subparagraph (3)(B)5.B. and subparagraph (3)(B)5.C. of this rule shall be, except for the situations outlined in part (3)(B)5.A.(II) of this rule, after the final recovery device, if a recovery system is present, prior to the inlet of any control device, and prior to any post-reactor or post-distillation unit introduction of halogenated compounds into the process vent stream. No traverse site selection method is needed for vents smaller than ten (10) centimeters in diameter.

      (II) If any gas stream other than the reactor or distillation vent stream is normally conducted through the final recovery device  --

      (a) The sampling site for vent stream flow rate and molar composition shall be prior to the final recovery device and prior to the point at which any nonreactor or nondistillation stream or stream from a nonaffected reactor or distillation unit is introduced. Method 18 shall be used to measure organic compound concentrations at this site;

      (b) The efficiency of the final recovery device shall be determined by measuring the organic compound concentrations using Method 18 at the inlet to the final recovery device after the introduction of all vent streams and at the outlet of the final recovery device; and

      (c) The efficiency of the final recovery device determined according to subpart (3)(B)5.A.(II)(b) of this rule shall be applied to the organic compound concentrations measured according to subpart (3)(B)5.A.(II)(a) of this rule to determine the concentrations of organic compounds from the final recovery device attributable to the reactor or distillation vent stream. The resulting organic compound concentrations are then used to perform the calculations outlined in subparagraph (3)(B)5.D. of this rule;

      B. The molar composition of the vent stream shall be determined as follows:

      (I) Method 18 to measure the concentration of organic compounds including those containing halogens; and
      (II) ASTM D1946-77 D1946-90(2015)e1, as specified in 10 CSR 10-6.040(16), to measure the concentration of carbon monoxide and hydrogen;

      C. The volumetric flow rate shall be determined using Method 2, 2A, 2C, or 2D, as appropriate;

      D. The emission rate of TOC (minus methane and ethane), (ETOC), in the vent stream shall be calculated using the following equation:

                  n
      ETOC = K2 Σ CjMjQs
                  j=1

where:

      ETOC = Emission rate of TOC (minus methane and ethane) in the sample, kilograms per hour.

      K2 = Constant, 2.494 x 10-6 (liters per parts per million)(gram-moles per standard cubic meter)(kilogram per gram)(minute per hour), where standard temperature for (gram-mole per standard cubic meter)(g-mole/scm) is twenty degrees Celsius (20[o]C).

      Cj = Concentration of compound "j", on a dry basis, in parts per million as measured by Method 18, as indicated in subparagraph (3)(B)3.C. of this rule;

      Mj = Molecular weight of sample "j", grams per grammole;

      Qs = Vent stream flow rate (standard cubic meters per minute) at a temperature of twenty degrees Celsius (20oC); and

      n = Number of components in the sample;

      E. The total process vent stream concentration (by volume) of compounds containing halogens (parts per million by volume, by compound) shall be summed from the individual concentrations of compounds containing halogens which were measured by Method 18; and

      F. The net heating value of the vent stream shall be calculated using the equation:

            n
      HT = K1 Σ CjHj (1 - Bws)
            j=1

where:

      HT = Net heating value of the sample (megajoule per standard cubic meter), where the net enthalpy per mole of vent stream is based on combustion at twenty five degrees Celsius (25[o]C) and seven hundred sixty (760) millimeters of mercury, but the standard temperature for determining the volume corresponding to one mole is twenty degrees Celsius (20[o]C), as in the definition of Qs (vent stream flow rate);

      K1 = Constant, 1.740 x 10[-7] (parts per million)[-1] (gram-mole per standard cubic meter), (megajoule per kilocalorie), where standard temperature for (gram-mole per standard cubic meter) is twenty degrees Celsius (20[o]C);

      Bws = Water vapor content of the vent stream, proportion by volume: except that if the vent stream passes through a final stream jet and is not condensed, it shall be assumed that Bws = 0.023 in order to correct to 2.3 percent moisture;

      Cj = Concentration on a dry basis of compound "j" in parts per million, as measured for all organic compounds by Method 18 and measured for hydrogen and carbon monoxide by the American Society for Testing and Materials D1946-77 D1946-90(2015)e1, as specified in 10 CSR 10-6.040(16);

      Hj = Net heat of combustion of compound "j", kilocalorie per gram-mole, based on combustion at twenty five degrees Celsius (25[o]C) and seven hundred sixty (760) millimeters of mercury. The heat of combustion of vent stream components shall be determined using ASTM D2382-76 D4809-13, as specified in 10 CSR 10-6.040(25), if published values are not available or cannot be calculated; and

      n = Number of components in the sample.

EPA Analysis:  Because the revised references in section (3)(B)5. are already SIP-approved, EPA finds that this revision does not affect the stringency of the SIP.

      6. The Total Resource Effectiveness (TRE) index.

      A. The TRE index value of the vent shall be calculated using the following equation:

                  1
      TRE =  --  --  --  [a + b (Qs) + c (Ht) + d(ETOC)]
                  ETOC

where:

      TRE = TRE index value;

      ETOC = Hourly emission rate of TOC (minus methane and ethane), (kilograms per hour) as calculated in subparagraph (3)(B)5.D. of this rule;

      Qs = Vent stream flow rate standard cubic meters per minute at a standard temperature of twenty degrees Celsius (20[o]C);

      HT = Vent stream net heating value (megajoules per standard cubic meter), as calculated in subparagraph (3)(B)5.F. of this rule; and

      a,b,c,d = Coefficients presented in Table 1.

      B. The owner or operator of a vent stream shall use the applicable coefficients in Table 1 to calculate the TRE index value based on a flare, a thermal incinerator with zero percent (0%) heat recovery, and a thermal incinerator with seventy percent (70%) heat recovery, and shall select the lowest TRE index value.

      C. The owner or operator of a unit with a halogenated vent stream, determined as any stream with a total concentration of halogen atoms contained in organic compounds of two hundred (200) parts per million by volume or greater, shall use the applicable coefficients in Table 1 to calculate the total resource effectiveness index value based on a thermal incinerator and scrubber.

      7. Each owner or operator of an affected facility seeking to comply with paragraph (3)(A)2. of this rule shall recalculate the flow rate and TOC concentration for that affected facility whenever process changes are made. Examples of process changes include changes in production capacity, feedstock type, or catalyst type, or whenever there is replacement, removal, or addition of recovery equipment. The flow rate and VOC concentration shall be recalculated based on test data, or on best engineering estimates of the effects of the change to the recovery system.

      8. Where the recalculated values yield a TRE index < 1.0, the owner or operator shall notify the state Air Pollution Control Program within one (1) week of the recalculation and shall conduct a performance test according to the methods and procedures required by subsection (3)(B) of this rule.

      9. For the purpose of demonstrating that a process vent stream has a VOC concentration below five hundred (500) parts per million by volume, the following procedures shall be followed:

      A. The sampling site shall be selected as specified in subparagraph (3)(B)3.A. of this rule;

      B. Method 18 or Method 25A of 40 CFR part 60, Appendix A, as specified in 10 CSR 10-6.030(22), shall be used to measure concentration; alternatively, any other method or data that has been validated according to the protocol in Method 301 of 40 CFR part 63, Appendix A may be used;

      (I) Where Method 18 is used, the following procedures shall be used to calculate parts per million by volume concentration:

      (a) The minimum sampling time for each run shall be one (1) hour in which either an integrated sample or four grab samples shall be taken. If grab sampling is used, then the samples shall be taken at approximately equal intervals in time, such as fifteen (15) minute intervals during the run; and

      (b) The concentration of TOC (minus methane and ethane) shall be calculated using Method 18 according to subparagraph (3)(B)3.D. of this rule.

      (II) Where Method 25A is used, the following procedures shall be used to calculate parts per million by volume TOC concentration:

      (a) Method 25A shall be used only if a single VOC is greater than fifty (50) percent of total VOC, by volume, in the process vent stream.

      (b) The process vent stream composition may be determined by either process knowledge, test data collected using an appropriate EPA method or a method of data collection validated according to the protocol in Method 301 of 40 CFR part 63, Appendix A. Examples of information that could constitute process knowledge include calculations based on material balances, process stoichiometry, or previous test results provided the results are still relevant to the current process vent stream conditions;

      (c) The VOC used as the calibration gas for Method 25A shall be the single VOC present at greater than fifty percent (50%) of the total VOC by volume;

      (d) The span value for Method 25A shall be fifty (50) parts per million by volume;

      (e) Use of Method 25A is acceptable if the response from the high-level calibration gas is at least twenty (20) times the standard deviation of the response from the zero calibration gas when the instrument is zeroed on the most sensitive scale; and

      (f) The concentration of TOC shall be corrected to three percent (3%) oxygen using the procedures and equation in subparagraph (3)(B)3.C. of this rule; and

      C. The owner or operator shall demonstrate that the concentration of TOC including methane and ethane measured by Method 25A is below two hundred fifty (250) parts per million by volume with VOC concentration below five hundred (500) parts per million by volume to qualify for the low concentration exclusion.

EPA Analysis:  Because the added reference in section (3)(B)9. is already SIP-approved, EPA finds that this revision does not affect the stringency of the SIP.

(C) Monitoring Requirements.

      1. The owner or operator of an affected facility that uses an incinerator to seek to comply with the TOC emission limit specified under subparagraph (3)(A)1.A. of this rule shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate according to manufacturer's specifications: a temperature monitoring device equipped with a continuous recorder and having a minimum accuracy of plus or minus one percent (+ 1 %) of the temperature being measured expressed in degrees Celsius or plus or minus (+) 0.5[o]C, whichever is more accurate.

      A. Where an incinerator other than a catalytic incinerator is used, a temperature monitoring device shall be installed in the firebox.

      B. Where a catalytic incinerator is used, temperature monitoring devices shall be installed in the gas stream immediately before and after the catalyst bed.

      2. The owner or operator of an affected facility that uses a flare to seek to comply with subparagraph (3)(A)1.B. of this rule shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate according to
manufacturer's specifications, a heat-sensing device, such as a ultraviolet beam sensor or thermocouple, at the pilot light to indicate continuous presence of a flame.

      3. The owner or operator of an affected facility that uses a boiler or process heater with a design heat input capacity less than forty-four (44) megawatts to seek to comply with subparagraph (3)(A)1.A. of this rule shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate according to the manufacturer's specifications, a temperature monitoring device in the firebox. The monitoring device should be equipped with a continuous recorder and have a minimum accuracy of plus or minus one percent (+ 1 %) of the temperature being measured expressed in degrees Celsius or plus or minus (+) 0.5[o]C, whichever is more accurate. Any boiler or process heater in which all vent streams are introduced with primary fuel is exempt from this requirement.

      4. The owner or operator of an affected facility that seeks to demonstrate compliance with the total resource effectiveness index limit specified under paragraph (3)(A)2. of this rule shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate according to manufacturer's specifications the following equipment:

      A. Where an absorber is the final recovery device in the recovery system  --

      (I) A scrubbing liquid temperature monitor equipped with a continuous recorder; and

      (II) Specific gravity monitor equipped with a continuous recorders;

      B. Where a condenser is the final recovery device in the recovery system, a condenser exit (product side) temperature monitoring device equipped with a continuous recorder and having a minimum accuracy of plus or minus one percent (+ 1 %) of the temperature being monitored expressed in degrees Celsius or plus or minus (+) 0.5[o]C, whichever is more accurate;

      C. Where a carbon adsorber is the final recovery device unit in the recovery system, in integrating regeneration stream flow monitoring device having a minimum accuracy of + 10 percent, capable of recording the total regeneration stream mass flow for each regeneration cycle; and a carbon bed temperature monitoring device having a minimum accuracy of + 1 percent of the temperature being monitored expressed in degrees Celsius or + 0.5[o]C, whichever is more accurate, and capable of recording the carbon bed temperature after each regeneration and within fifteen (15) minutes of completing any cooling cycle; or

      D. Where an absorber scrubs halogenated streams after an incinerator, boiler, or process heater, the following monitoring equipment is required for the scrubber  --

      (I) A pH monitoring device equipped with a continuous recorder; and

      (II) Flow meters equipped with a continuous recorders to be located at the scrubber influent for liquid flow and the scrubber inlet for gas stream flow.

      5. The owner or operator of a process vent using a vent system that contains bypass lines that could divert a vent stream away from the combustion device used shall either  --

      A. Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a flow indicator that provides a record of vent stream flow at least once every fifteen (15) minutes. The flow indicator shall be installed at the entrance to any bypass line that could divert the vent stream away from the combustion device to the atmosphere; or

      B. Secure the bypass line valve in the closed position with a car-seal or a lock-and-key type configuration. A visual inspection of the seal or closure mechanism shall be performed at least once every month to ensure that the valve is maintained in the closed position and the vent stream is not diverted through the bypass line.

(4) Reporting and Record Keeping.

(A) Each reactor process or distillation operation subject to this rule shall keep records of the following parameters measured during a performance test or TRE determination required under subsection (3)(B) of this rule and required to be monitored under subsection (3)(C) of this rule.

      1. Where an owner or operator subject to the provisions of this rule seeks to demonstrate compliance with subparagraph (3)(A)1.A. of this rule through the use of either a thermal or catalytic incinerator  --

      A. The average firebox temperature of the incinerator (or the average temperature upstream and downstream of the catalyst bed for a catalytic incinerator), measured at least every fifteen (15) minutes and averaged over the same time period of the performance testing; and

      B. The percent reduction of TOC determined as specified in paragraph (3)(B)3. of this rule achieved by the incinerator, or the concentration of TOC (parts per million by volume, by compound) determined as specified in paragraph (3)(B)3. of this rule at the outlet of the control device on a dry basis corrected to three percent (3%) oxygen.

      2. Where an owner or operator subject to the provisions of this rule seeks to demonstrate compliance with subparagraph (3)(A)1.A. of this rule through the use of a boiler or process heater and the boiler or process heater is not exempt from these requirements due to all vent streams being introduced with primary fuel --

      A. A description of the location at which the vent stream is introduced into the boiler or process heater; and

      B. The average combustion temperature of the boiler or process heater with a design heat input capacity of less than forty-four (44) megawatts measured at least every fifteen (15) minutes and averaged over the same time period of the performance test.

      3. Where an owner or operator subject to the provisions of this rule seeks to demonstrate compliance with subparagraph (3)(A)1.B. of this rule through the use of a smokeless flare; flare design (i.e., steam-assisted, air-assisted, or nonassisted), all visible emission readings, heat content determinations, flow rate measurements, and exit velocity determinations made during the performance test, continuous records of the flare pilot flame monitoring, and records of all periods of operations during which the pilot flame is absent.

      4. Where an owner or operator subject to the provisions of this rule seeks to demonstrate compliance with paragraph (3)(A)2. of this rule  --

      A. All measurements and calculations performed to determine the flow rate, and volatile organic compound concentration, heating value, and TRE index value of the vent stream; and

      B. Records shall be kept of the following final recovery device parameters:

      (I) Where an absorber is the final recovery device in the recovery system, the exit specific gravity (or alternative parameter which is a measure of the degree of absorbing liquid saturation, if approved, by the permitting authority), and average exit temperature of the absorbing liquid measured at least fifteen (15) minutes and averaged over the same time period of the performance testing (both measured while the vent stream is normally routed and constituted);

      (II) Where a condenser is the final recovery device in the recovery system, the average exit (product side) temperature measured at least every fifteen (15) minutes and averaged over the same time period of the performance testing while the vent stream is routed and constituted normally; or

      (III) Where a carbon adsorber is the final recovery device in the recovery system, the total stream mass or volumetric flow measured at least every fifteen (15) minutes and averaged over the same time period of the performance test (full carbon bed cycle), temperature of the carbon bed after regeneration (and within fifteen (15) minutes of completion of any cooling cycle(s)), and duration of the carbon bed steaming cycle (all measured while the vent stream is routed and constituted normally).

      5. As an alternative to subparagraphs (4)(A)4.A. or (4)(A)4.B. of this rule, the concentration level or reading indicated by the organics monitoring device at the outlet of the absorber, condenser, or carbon adsorber, measured at least every fifteen (15) minutes and averaged over the same time period as the performance testing while the vent stream is normally routed and constituted.

(B) Each reactor process or distillation operation seeking to comply with paragraph (3)(A)2. of this rule shall also keep records of the following information:

      1. Any changes in production capacity, feedstock type, or catalyst type, or of any replacement, removal, and addition of recovery equipment or reactors and distillation units; and

      2. Any recalculation of the flow rate, TOC concentration, or TRE value performed according to paragraph (3)(B)7. of this rule.

(C) Each reactor process or distillation operation seeking to comply with the flow rate or concentration exemption level in paragraph (1)(B)4. of this rule shall keep records to indicate that the stream flow rate is less than 0.0085 standard cubic meters per minute or the concentration is less than five hundred (500) parts per million by volume.

(D) Each reactor process or distillation operation seeking to comply with the production capacity exemption level of one (1) gigagrams per year shall keep records of the design production capacity and changes in equipment or process operation that may affect design production capacity to the affected process unity.

(E) All records must be kept on site for a period of five (5) years and made available to the department upon request.

(5) Test Methods. See section (3) of this rule for applicable test methods.

EPA Analysis: As part of the state comment period on the rule, EPA provided general comments on this rule which was part of a larger rulemaking package. EPA has determined that MoDNR has adequately addressed those comments. The other comments were largely related to administrative changes and did not affect the approvability or the stringency of the rule. Therefore, EPA finds that MoDNR has adequately addressed the comments. The comments EPA provided relevant to this rule and the state's responses are included in the state submittal in the docket.