[Federal Register: November 16, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 221)] [CORRECTIONS]                [Page 64708] [DOCID:fr16no07-181]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2007-0030; Notice 1]

  Graco Children's Products, Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision  of Inconsequential Noncompliance

Correction

    In notice document E7-21903 beginning on page 63231 in the issue of  Thursday, November 8, 2007, make the following correction:     On page 63232, in the first column, in the first full paragraph,  ``December 10, 2007'' should read ``November 19, 2007''.

[FR Doc. Z7-21903 Filed 11-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 203 (Friday, October 21, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63978-63980]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22203]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1297; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-00570-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 7X airplanes. This proposed
AD was prompted by a report of smoke in the flightdeck and loss of the
right-hand (RH) primary display unit (PDU) and the secondary flight
display (SFD). This proposed AD would require inspecting the two
electrical power feeders for damage (deterioration), measuring the
clearance between the two electrical power feeders and the forward
lavatory bulkhead, and applicable corrective actions, as specified in a
European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is proposed for
incorporation by reference (IBR). The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 5,
2022.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2022-1297; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this NPRM, the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
     For material that is proposed for IBR in this NPRM,
contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone
+49 221 8999 000; email [email protected]; website easa.europa.eu. You
may find this material on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu. It is
also available in the AD docket at regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2022-1297.
     You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, FAA, International Validation Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2022-1297; Project Identifier
MCAI-2022-00570-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the

following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, FAA,
International Validation Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA
98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected]. Any
commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated
as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2022-0073, dated April 27, 2022
(EASA AD 2022-0073) (also referred to as the MCAI), to correct an
unsafe condition for certain Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 7X
airplanes.
    This proposed AD was prompted by a report of smoke in the
flightdeck and loss of the RH PDU and the SFD. The subsequent
investigation determined that chafing and arcing of the electrical
power feeders with the forward lavatory bulkhead led to smoke and loss
of the RH PDU and the SFD power supply. The FAA is proposing this AD to
address chafing and arcing of the electrical power feeders with the
forward lavatory bulkhead, which could lead to loss of systems
supporting flight automation and flight displays and reduced
situational awareness, possibly resulting in a significant increase of
flightcrew workload and injury to occupants. See the MCAI for
additional background information.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2022-0073 specifies procedures for inspecting the two
electrical power feeders for damage (deterioration), measuring the
clearance between the two electrical power feeders and the forward
lavatory bulkhead, and applicable corrective actions. The corrective
actions include repairing any electrical power feeder with
deterioration and modifying the forward lavatory bulkhead. If a
clearance of more than 1 millimeter (mm) but less than or equal to 13
mm is detected, the corrective action includes installing ROUNDIT200NX
sheath on the affected electrical power feeder using white binding
braid. If a clearance of more than 13 mm is detected, the corrective
action includes looking for the presence of a blue cable grip around
the electrical power feeders and installing it if it is missing. This
material is reasonably available because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, it
has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2022-0073 described previously, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been
coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, the
FAA proposes to incorporate EASA AD 2022-0073 by reference in the FAA
final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with
EASA AD 2022-0073 in its entirety through that incorporation, except
for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of
this proposed AD. Using common terms that are the same as the heading
of a particular section in EASA AD 2022-0073 does not mean that
operators need comply only with that section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ``all required actions and compliance times,''
compliance with this AD requirement is not limited to the section
titled ``Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s)'' in EASA AD 2022-
0073. Service information required by EASA AD 2022-0073 for compliance
will be available at regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2022-1297 after the FAA final rule is published.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD would affect 45 airplanes
of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 work-hours x $85 per hour = $170...........................              $0             $170           $7,650
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition actions that would be required based on the results of any
required actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these on-condition actions:

                 Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Labor cost                 Parts cost       Cost per product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 33 work-hours x $85 per     Up to $431........  Up to $3,236.
 hour = $2,805.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate.
According to the manufacturer, however, some or all of the costs of
this proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected operators.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA-2022-1297; Project Identifier
MCAI-2022-00570-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by December 5, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 7X airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2022-0073, dated April 27, 2022
(EASA AD 2022-0073).

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24, Electrical
power.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of smoke in the flightdeck and
loss of the right-hand primary display unit (PDU) and the secondary
flight display (SFD). The FAA is issuing this AD to address chafing
and arcing of the electrical power feeders with the forward lavatory
bulkhead, which could lead loss of systems supporting flight
automation and flight displays and reduced situational awareness,
possibly resulting in a significant increase of flightcrew workload
and injury to occupants.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2022-0073.

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2022-0073

    (1) Where EASA AD 2022-0073 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2022-0073 does not apply
to this AD.

(i) Additional AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Validation Branch send it to the attention of the person identified
in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Dassault Aviation's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(j) Related Information

    (1) For EASA AD 2022-0073, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; website easa.europa.eu. You may find this EASA
AD on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
This material may be found in the AD docket at regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-1297.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, FAA, International
Validation Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

    Issued on October 6, 2022.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-22203 Filed 10-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 25, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58987-58988]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23246]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 49

[EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0009; FRL-9901-28-Region9]

Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Navajo Nation;
Regional Haze Requirements for Navajo Generating Station; Extension of
Public Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of extended comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 5, 2013, EPA proposed a Best Available Retrofit
Technology (BART) determination for oxides of nitrogen (NOX)
for the Navajo Generating Station (NGS), located on the Navajo Nation,
and provided a three-month period to accept public comments that was
scheduled to close on May 6, 2013. At the request of interested
stakeholders, EPA extended the comment period on two occasions, first
on March 19, 2013, and again on July 9, 2013. The comment period was
scheduled to close October 4, 2013. Additionally, on June 19, 2013, EPA
announced our intention to hold five public hearings to accept written
and oral comment on our proposed BART determination for NGS. On July
26, 2013, a group of stakeholders, known as the Technical Work Group
(TWG), submitted its recommendation for an additional BART Alternative
to EPA for consideration (TWG Alternative). EPA is in the process of
evaluating this alternative. Because EPA has not yet announced the
schedule for the public hearings, and because EPA is still evaluating
the TWG Alternative and may supplement our February 5, 2013 proposal,
EPA is extending the comment period an additional three months. EPA
intends to hold the public hearings prior to the close of this extended
comment period and to announce the schedule shortly.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rulemaking for NGS must be postmarked
no later than January 6, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2013-0009, by one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
    (2) Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (3) Mail or deliver: Anita Lee (Air-2), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    For more detailed instructions concerning how to submit comments on
this proposed rule, and for more information on our proposed rule,
please see the notice of proposed rulemaking, published in the Federal
Register on February 5, 2013 (78 FR 8274).
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an email directly to EPA, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
    Hearings: EPA intends to schedule five public hearings to accept
oral and written comments on the proposed rulemaking. EPA intends to
hold the public hearings at locations on the Navajo Nation and the Hopi
Tribe, as well as in Page, Phoenix, and Tucson, Arizona. EPA will
provide notice and additional details related to the hearings in the
Federal Register, on our Web site, and in the docket for this proposed
rulemaking.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region 9,
75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at EPA Region 9 (e.g., maps, voluminous reports,
copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available in either
location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please
schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anita Lee, EPA Region 9, (415) 972-
3958<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we'', ``us'',
and ``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. Today's Action

I. Background

    NGS is a coal-fired power plant located on the Navajo Nation Indian
Reservation, just east of Page, Arizona, approximately 135 miles north
of Flagstaff, Arizona. Emissions of NOX from NGS affect
visibility at 11 National Parks and Wilderness Areas that are
designated as Class I federal areas (Class I areas), mandated by
Congress to receive heightened protection. NGS is subject to the BART
requirement of the CAA and the Regional Haze Rule (RHR) based on its
age and its effects on visibility in Class I areas.
    On February 5, 2013, EPA proposed a BART determination to require
NGS to achieve a nearly 80 percent reduction of its current overall
NOX emission rate. EPA also proposed an alternative to BART
that would provide flexibility to NGS in the schedule for the
installation of new post-combustion control equipment. As discussed in
more detail in our proposed rulemaking, EPA proposed to exercise its
authority and discretion under section 301(d)(4) of the CAA (42 U.S.C.
Sec.  7601(d)(4)), and the Tribal Authority Rule (40 CFR 49.11(a)), to
credit NGS for its early and voluntary installation of new combustion
controls and to propose an extended timeframe for NGS for alternative
measures to BART under the RHR.
    In recognition that there may be other approaches that could result
in better visibility benefits than BART, as well as the importance of
NGS to the Navajo Nation, Hopi Tribe, the Gila River Indian Community,
and numerous other

tribes located in Arizona, EPA also outlined a framework for evaluating
other BART alternatives (``better than BART'' alternatives) that
provide greater emission reductions than EPA's proposed BART
alternative in exchange for greater flexibility.
    EPA encouraged a robust public discussion of our proposed BART
determination and alternative, as well as other possible alternatives,
and recognized the potential need for a supplemental proposal if
approaches developed by other parties are identified as meeting the
requirements of the CAA.
    EPA received requests for a 90-day extension of the public comment
period from the Navajo Nation, the Gila River Indian Community (Gila
River, or the Community), Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement
and Power District (SRP), and the Central Arizona Water Conservation
District (CAWCD), in order to allow stakeholders time to develop
alternatives to BART for EPA's consideration. On March 19, 2013, EPA
extended the close of the public comment period to August 5, 2013 (78
FR 16825).
    On June 10, 2013, EPA signed a notice, published on June 19, 2013,
of our intent to hold five public hearings throughout the state of
Arizona (78 FR 36716). EPA intends to hold hearings at one location
each on reservation lands of the Navajo Nation and Hopi Tribe, and in
Page, Phoenix, and Tucson, Arizona.
    On June 20, 2013, SRP submitted a letter, on behalf of six
stakeholders, requesting another extension of the comment period for
NGS. On July 9, 2013, EPA extended the close of the public comment
period to October 4, 2013 (78 FR 41012).
    On July 26, 2013, a group of stakeholders known as the Technical
Work Group (TWG) and consisting of the CAWCD, the Environmental Defense
Fund (EDF), Gila River, Navajo Nation, SRP, on behalf of itself and the
other non-federal Participants, Interior, and Western Resource
Advocates, submitted a document to EPA memorializing a multi-party
agreement (the TWG Agreement).\1\ The TWG Alternative to BART was
included as Appendix B to the TWG Agreement. EPA is currently
evaluating the TWG Alternative to determine if it is consistent with
the RHR and the framework for ``better than BART'' Alternatives put
forth in our February 5, 2013 proposed rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See ``Technical Work Group Agreement Related to Navajo
Generating Station (NGS)'' dated July 25, 2013, and submitted to EPA
on July 26, 2013, in the docket for this proposed rulemaking at EPA-
R09-OAR-2013-0009-0122.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because EPA has not yet scheduled the public hearings for NGS and
because we are still evaluating the TWG Alternative, EPA is extending
the close of the comment period to accept written and oral comment on
our proposed rulemaking for NGS.

II. Today's Action

    In today's action, EPA is extending the close of the comment period
for our proposed rulemaking for NGS by three months, to January 6,
2014. EPA intends to announce the schedule for public hearings in a
forthcoming notice in the Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 49

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Indians,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen Dioxide.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: September 16, 2013.
Elizabeth Adams,
Acting Air Division Director, Region 9.
[FR Doc. 2013-23246 Filed 9-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21586-21588]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07745]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0253; Airspace Docket No. 21-ANM-09]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Coeur D'Alene--Pappy
Boyington Field, ID

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify the Class E surface airspace,
and the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface at Coeur D'Alene--Pappy Boyington Field, ID. These airspace
modifications support the addition of the RNAV GPS RWY 2 Instrument
Approach Procedure (IAP, and the removal of the VOR/DME RWY 2 IAP at
the airport). Additionally, this action proposes updates to the legal
description. The Airport's location and use of the term ``Notice to
Airmen'' are not correct and will require modification. These actions
will ensure the safety and management of IFR operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 27, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of

Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone:
1-800-647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2022-0253; Airspace Docket No. 21-ANM-09, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathan A. Chaffman, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western Service Center, Operations Support Group, 2200
S 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority,
as it would modify Class E airspace at Coeur D'Alene--Pappy Boyington
Field, ID, to support IFR operations at the airport.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Persons wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2022-0253;
Airspace Docket No. 21-ANM-09''. The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 2200 S 216th Street, Des Moines, WA
98198.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective
September 15, 2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F
lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service
routes, and reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 by modifying
Class E surface airspace and Class E airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface at Coeur D'Alene--Pappy Boyington Field, ID.
    The area north of the airport requires additional airspace to
properly contain departures due to rising terrain adjoining the Class E
surface area in the northeast. The FAA proposes to widen and extend
both the Class E surface area and Class E airspace extending upward
from 700 feet above the surface to properly contain departures to
points 700 feet above the surface and 1,200 feet above the surface,
respectively.
    Furthermore, the FAA proposes to modify the Class E airspace south
of the airport. Both the current southern extension to the Class E
surface area and the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
require modification to properly contain the 1,000 foot and 1,500 foot
points of the RNAV GPS RWY 2 IAP, respectively.
    Additionally, the FAA proposes to modify the Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet west of the airport to better contain
the 1,500 foot point of the RNAV GPS RWY 6 IAP, and to account for
rising terrain west of the airport.
    Finally, the FAA proposes to make administrative changes to the
current legal descriptions. The Class E airspace extending from 700
feet above the surface is defined on line 1 of the current description
to be located in ``WA'' State, and requires amendment to show the
correct State, annotated as ``ID.'' Additionally, the legal description
of the Class E airspace defined as a surface area uses the phrase
``Notice to Airmen.'' This should be amended to read ``Notice to Air
Missions'' to match the FAA's current definition of ``NOTAM.''
    Class E2 and E5 airspace designations are published in paragraphs
6002 and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order JO 7400.11F, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, which is incorporated by
reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in
this document will be published subsequently in FAA Order JO 7400.11.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial, and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

ANM ID E2 Coeur D'Alene, ID [Amended]

Coeur D'Alene--Pappy Boyington Field
    (Lat. 47[deg]46'28'' N, long. 116[deg]49'11'' W)

    That airspace within a 4.4-mile radius of the Coeur D'Alene--
Pappy Boyington Field, and within 1 mile each side of the 193[deg]
bearing extending from the 4.4-mile radius to 5.5 miles south of the
airport, and that airspace 1.5 miles west and 3.5 miles east of the
019[deg] bearing extending from the 4.4-mile radius to 5.2 miles
northeast of the airport. This Class E airspace is effective during
the specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to
Air Missions. The effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ANM ID E5 Coeur D'Alene, ID [Amended]

Coeur D'Alene--Pappy Boyington Field
    (Lat. 47[deg]46'28'' N, long. 116[deg]49'11'' W)

    That airspace within a 4.4-mile radius of the Coeur D'Alene--
Pappy Boyington Field, and within 2.2 miles each side of the
193[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 4.4-mile radius
to 9 miles south of the airport, and that airspace 4.4 miles each
side of the 251[deg] bearing from the Coeur D'Alene--Pappy Boyington
Field extending from the 4.4-mile radius to 16 miles west of the
airport and that airspace 1.8 miles west and 4 miles east of the
013[deg] bearing from the Coeur D'Alene--Pappy Boyington Field
extending from the 4.4-mile radius to 8.5 miles northeast from the
airport.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on April 5, 2022.
B.G. Chew,
Acting Group Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2022-07745 Filed 4-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 102 (Wednesday, May 28, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30490-30492]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12244]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0286; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-004-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 737-600 and -700 series airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by reports of cracking in a bulkhead
lower frame. This proposed AD would require a detailed and open hole
high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection of the left- and right-
side lower frame webs and inner chords for cracking, if necessary, and
corrective actions and preventative modifications, if necessary. This
proposed AD would also provide for optional terminating action for the
repetitive inspections under certain conditions. We are proposing this
AD to detect and correct cracking in a bulkhead lower frame web and
inner chord, which could result in a severed frame and induced skin
cracks, and lead to rapid decompression of the fuselage.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 14, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0286; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Pohl, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0286;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-004-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy

aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by
the closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of those
comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We have received reports of cracking in the STA 727 bulkhead lower
frame. This condition, if not corrected, could result in a severed
frame and induced skin cracks, and lead to rapid decompression of the
fuselage.

Relevant Service Information

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1325, dated
December 3, 2013. For information on the procedures and compliance
times, see this service information at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for Docket No. FAA-2014-0286.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require a detailed and open hole HFEC
inspection of the left- and right-side lower frame webs and inner
chords for cracking, if necessary, and corrective actions and
preventative modifications, if necessary; except as discussed under
``Differences Between this Proposed AD and the Service Information.''
    The phrase ``corrective actions'' is used in this proposed AD.
``Corrective actions'' are actions that correct or address any
condition found. Corrective actions in an AD could include, for
example, repairs.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information

    The service information specifies to contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to do certain inspections and repair certain
conditions, but this proposed AD would require accomplishing those
actions in one of the following ways:
     In accordance with a method that we approve; or
     Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) whom we have
authorized to make those findings.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 489 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on  U.S.
              Action                        Labor cost            Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections.......................  37 work-hours x $85 per                $0           $3,145       $1,537,905
                                     hour = $3,145.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs that
would be required based on the results of the proposed inspections. We
have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these
repairs:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                   Action                                 Labor cost                Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair (per side)..........................  11 work-hours x $85 per hour = $935          $2,820          $3,755
Modification...............................  17 work-hours x $85 per hour =                1,132           2,577
                                              $1,445.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. Amend Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2014-0286; Directorate Identifier
2014-NM-004-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by July 14, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-600 and -700
series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1325, dated December 3, 2013.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracking in the body station
(STA) 727 bulkhead lower frame. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct cracking in a bulkhead lower frame web and inner chord,
which could result in a severed framed and induced skin cracks, and
lead to rapid decompression of the fuselage.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspections

    At the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1325, dated
December 3, 2013, except as provided by paragraph (i)(1) of this AD:
Do a detailed and open hole high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspection of the left- and right-side lower frame webs and inner
chords for cracking, as applicable, and do all applicable corrective
actions and preventative modifications, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1325, dated December 3, 2013, except as required by paragraph
(i)(2) of this AD. Repeat the applicable inspections required by
this paragraph thereafter at the applicable intervals specified in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1325, dated December 3, 2013. Do all applicable corrective
actions and preventative modifications before further flight.

(h) Terminating Action

    Accomplishment of a modification or a repair in accordance with
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1325, dated December 3, 2013,
terminates the repetitive inspections in this AD for the repaired or
modified side only.

(i) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications

    (1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1325, dated
December 3, 2013, specifies a compliance time ``after the original
issue date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance
within the specified compliance time after the effective date of
this AD.
    (2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1325, dated
December 3, 2013, specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate
action: Before further flight, accomplish the corresponding action
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (k) of this AD.

(j) Post-Repair Inspections

    The post-repair inspections, specified in tables 4, 5, and 6 of
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1325, dated December 3, 2013, are not required by this AD.

    Note 1 to paragraph (j) of this AD: The damage tolerance
inspections specified in tables 4, 5, and 6 of paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1325, dated
December 3, 2013, may be used in support of compliance with Section
121.1109(c)(2) or 129.109(b)(2) of the Federal Aviation Regulations
(14 CFR 121.1109(c)(2) or 14 CFR 129.109(b)(2)). The corresponding
actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1325, dated December 3, 2013, are not
required by this AD.

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

(l) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Alan Pohl,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 15, 2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-12244 Filed 5-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3697-3698]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01503]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP18-49-000]

Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc.; Notice of Application

    Take notice that on January 16, 2018, Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania,
Inc. (CPA), 121 Champion Way, Suite 100, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania
15317, filed in Docket No. CP18-49-000 an application pursuant to
section 7(f) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) requesting a service area
determination within which CPA may, without further Commission
authorization, enlarge or expand its facilities. CPA states that this
determination will allow it to transport natural gas from a delivery
point in Ohio for distribution to consumers in Pennsylvania. CPA
asserts that it recently discovered that one of the Columbia Gas
Transmission, LLC points of delivery that serves CPA is located in
Columbiana County, Ohio, approximately 679 feet from the Pennsylvania
border. CPA avers that it further discovered that there is a Columbia
Gas of Ohio, Inc. customer in Ohio being serviced from the CPA
pipeline. CPA does not contemplate any change in its operations and
does not plan to serve any customers in Ohio. CPA additionally requests
that the Commission determine that CPA qualifies as a local
distribution company for the purposes of transportation under section
311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act and that it be granted waiver of all
reporting and accounting requirements, as well as other rules and
regulations that are normally applicable to natural gas companies
subject to the Commission's jurisdiction, all as more fully set forth
in the application which is on file with the Commission and open to
public inspection. The filing is available for review at the Commission
in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's
website web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter
the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
[email protected] or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,
(202) 502-8659.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to Brooke
E Wancheck, Assistant General Counsel, 290 W Nationwide Blvd.,
Columbus, Ohio 43215, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or Kenneth W
Christman, Assistant General Counsel, 121 Champion Way, Suite 100,
Canonsburg, Pennsylvania 15317, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the EA for this proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's
public record for this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and
state agencies of the timing for the completion of all necessary
reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations
within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to

obtain legal status by becoming a party to the proceedings for this
project should, on or before the comment date stated below file with
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR
157.10). A person obtaining party status will be placed on the service
list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will receive
copies of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other
parties. A party must submit seven copies of filings made in the
proceeding with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant
and to every other party. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for
court review of Commission orders in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentors will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at
http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 12, 2018.

    Dated: January 22, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-01503 Filed 1-25-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 110 (Thursday, June 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30970-30973]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12127]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2021-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2140]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Federal
Regulations. The LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will be finalized on the dates
listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS report in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact

stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Chief executive officer of                                      Online location of letter of                             Community
         State and county           Location and case No.             community               Community map repository               map revision             Date of modification       No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona:
    Apache........................  Town of Eagar (21-09-  The Honorable Bryce Hamblin,    Public Works Department, 1162   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Jul. 21, 2021..........       040103
                                     0424P).                Mayor, Town of Eagar, 22 West   South Water Canyon Road,        advanceSearch.
                                                            2nd Street, Eagar, AZ 85925.    Eagar, AZ 85925.
    Maricopa......................  City of Peoria (20-09- The Honorable Cathy Carlat,     City Hall, 8401 West Monroe     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Sep. 3, 2021...........       040050
                                     2036P).                Mayor, City of Peoria, 8401     Street, Peoria, AZ 85345.       advanceSearch.
                                                            West Monroe Street, Peoria,
                                                            AZ 85345.
    Maricopa......................  City of Peoria (20-09- The Honorable Cathy Carlat,     City Hall, 8401 West Monroe     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Aug. 20, 2021..........       040050
                                     2066P).                Mayor, City of Peoria, 8401     Street, Peoria, AZ 85345.       advanceSearch.
                                                            West Monroe Street, Peoria,
                                                            AZ 85345.
    Maricopa......................  City of Surprise (20-  The Honorable Skip Hall,        Public Works Department,        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Aug. 6, 2021...........       040053
                                     09-2202P).             Mayor, City of Surprise,        Engineering Development         advanceSearch.
                                                            16000 North Civic Center        Services, 16000 North Civic
                                                            Plaza, Surprise, AZ 85374.      Center Plaza, Surprise, AZ
                                                                                85374.
    Maricopa......................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Jack Sellers,     Flood Control District          https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Sep. 3, 2021...........       040037
                                     of Maricopa County     Chairman, Board of              Maricopa County, 2801 West      advanceSearch.
                                     (20-09-2036P).         Supervisors, Maricopa County,   Durango Street, Phoenix, AZ
                                                            301 West Jefferson Street,      85009.
                                                            10th Floor, Phoenix, AZ
                                                            85003.
    Maricopa......................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Jack Sellers,     Flood Control District of       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Aug. 6, 2021...........       040037
                                     of Maricopa County     Chairman, Board of              Maricopa County, 2801 West      advanceSearch.
                                     (20-09-2202P).         Supervisors, Maricopa County,   Durango Street, Phoenix, AZ
                                                            301 West Jefferson Street,      85009.
                                                            10th Floor, Phoenix, AZ
                                                            85003.
    Pinal.........................  Town of Superior (20-  The Honorable Mila Besich-      Town Hall, 199 North Lobb       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Aug. 5, 2021...........       040119
                                     09-1494P).             Lira, Mayor, Town of            Avenue, Superior, AZ 85173.     advanceSearch.
                                                            Superior, 199 North Lobb
                                                            Avenue, Superior, AZ 85173.
    Pinal.........................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Stephen Q.        Pinal County Engineering        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Aug. 5, 2021...........       040077
                                     of Pinal County (20-   Miller, Chairman, Board of      Division, 31 North Pinal        advanceSearch.
                                     09-1494P).             Supervisors, Pinal County,      Street, Building F, Florence,
                                                            P.O. Box 827, Florence, AZ      AZ 85132.
                                                            85132.
California: Riverside.............  City of Corona (20-09- The Honorable Jacque Casillas,  City Hall, 400 South Vicentia   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Sep. 14, 2021..........       060250
                                     0482P).                Mayor, City of Corona, 400      Avenue, Corona, CA 92882.       advanceSearch.
                                                            South Vicentia Avenue,
                                                            Corona, CA 92882.
Colorado: El Paso.................  Unincorporated Areas   Mr. Mark Waller, Chair,         EL Paso County, Pikes Peak      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Aug. 26, 2021..........       080059
                                     of El Paso County      District 2 Commissioner,        Regional Building Department,   advanceSearch.
                                     (19-08-0704P).         Centennial Hall, 200 South      2880 International Circle,
                                                            Cascade Avenue, Suite 100,      Colorado Springs, CO 80910.
                                                            Colorado Springs, CO 80903.
Idaho:
    Blaine........................  City of Ketchum (20-   The Honorable Neil Bradshaw,    City Hall, 480 East Avenue      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Sep. 2, 2021...........       160023
                                     10-0739P).             Mayor, City of Ketchum, P.O.    North, Ketchum, ID 83340.       advanceSearch.
                                                            Box 2315, Ketchum, ID 83340.
    Blaine........................  Unincorporated Areas   Ms. Angenie McCleary, Vice      Blaine County Planning &        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Sep. 2, 2021...........       165167
                                     of Blaine County (20-  Chair, Blaine County            Zoning, 219 1st Avenue South,   advanceSearch.
                                     10-0739P).             Commissioners, 206 1st Avenue   Suite 208, Hailey, ID 83333.
                                                            South, Suite 300, Hailey, ID
                                                            83333.
Illinois: Kane....................  Village of Montgomery  The Honorable Matthew Brolley,  Village Hall, 200 North River   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Sep. 10, 2021..........       170328
                                     (21[dash]05[dash]021   Village President, Village of   Street, Montgomery, IL 60538.   advanceSearch.
                                     3P).                   Montgomery, 200 North River
                                                            Street, Montgomery, IL 60538.

Kansas: Johnson...................  City of Shawnee (20-   The Honorable Michelle          City Hall, 11110 Johnson        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Sep. 1, 2021...........       200177
                                     07-0627P).             Distler, Mayor, City of         Drive, Shawnee, KS 66203.       advanceSearch.
                                                            Shawnee, City Hall, 11110
                                                            Johnson Drive, Shawnee, KS
                                                            66203.
Nevada:
    Elko..........................  City of Elko (20-09-   The Honorable Reece Keener,     City Hall, 1751 College         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Aug. 5, 2021...........       320010
                                     1987P).                Mayor, City of Elko, 1751       Avenue, Elko, NV 89801.         advanceSearch.
                                                            College Avenue, Elko, NV
                                                            89801.
    Washoe........................  City of Reno (21-09-   The Honorable Hillary Schieve,  City Hall, 1 East 1st Street,   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Aug. 10, 2021..........       320020
                                     0352P).                Mayor, City of Reno, 1 East     Reno, NV 89501.                 advanceSearch.
                                                            1st Street, Reno, NV 89501.
    Washoe........................  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Bob Lucey,        Washoe County Administration    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Aug. 10, 2021..........       320019
                                     of Washoe County (21-  Chairman, Board of              Building, Department of         advanceSearch.
                                     09-0352P).             Commissioners, Washoe County,   Public Works, 1001 East 9th
                                                            1001 East 9th Street, Reno,     Street, Reno, NV 89512.
                                                            NV 89512.
Ohio:
    Fairfield.....................  City of Lancaster (21- The Honorable David L.          City Building Department, 121   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Sep 8, 2021............       390161
                                     05-0317P).             Scheffler, Mayor, City of       East Chestnut Street,           advanceSearch.
                                                            Lancaster, 104 East Main        Lancaster, OH 43130.
                                                            Street, Room 101, Lancaster,
                                                            OH 43130.
    Fairfield.....................  Unincorporated Areas   Mr. Dave Levacy, Commissioner,  Fairfield County Regional       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Sep 8, 2021............       390158
                                     of Fairfield County    Fairfield County                Planning Commission, 210 East   advanceSearch.
                                     (21-05-0317P).         Commissioners, 210 East Main    Main Street, Room 104,
                                                            Street, Room 301, Lancaster,    Lancaster, OH 43130.
                                                            OH 43130.
Oregon:
    Lane..........................  City of Eugene (20-10- The Honorable Lucy Vinis,       Planning Department, 99 West    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Aug. 18, 2021..........       410122
                                     1089P).                Mayor, City of Eugene, 101      10th Avenue, Eugene, OR         advanceSearch.
                                                            West 10th Avenue, 2nd Floor,    97401.
                                                            Eugene, OR 97401.
    Lane..........................  Unincorporated Areas   Ms. Heather Buch,               Lane County, Customer Service   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Aug. 18, 2021..........       415591
                                     of Lane County (20-    Commissioner, Board of County   Center, 3050 North Delta        advanceSearch.
                                     10-1089P).             Commissioners, Lane County,     Highway, Eugene, OR 97408.
                                                            Public Service Building, 125
                                                            East 8th Avenue, Eugene, OR
                                                            97401.
Washington:
    King..........................  City of Kent (21-10-   The Honorable Dana Ralph,       City Hall, 220 4th Avenue       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Aug. 27, 2021..........       530080
                                     0511P).                Mayor, City of Kent, 220 4th    South, Kent, WA 98032.          advanceSearch.
                                                            Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032.
    Yakima........................  City of Yakima (20-10- The Honorable Patricia Byers,   City Hall, 129 North 2nd        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Sep. 7, 2021...........       530311
                                     1163P).                Mayor, City of Yakima, 129      Street, Yakima, WA 98901.       advanceSearch.
                                                            North 2nd Street, Yakima, WA
                                                            98901.
    Yakima........................  Unincorporated Areas   Mr. Ron Anderson, District 2,   Yakima County Public Services,  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Sep. 7, 2021...........       530217
                                     of Yakima County (20-  Commissioner, Yakima County,    128 North 2nd Street, Yakima,   advanceSearch.
                                     10-1163P).             128 North 2nd Street, Room      WA 98901.
                                                            232, Yakima, WA 98901.
Wisconsin:
    Brown.........................  Village of Hobart (21- Mr. Rich Heidel, President,     Village Hall, 2456 Glendale     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Sep. 6, 2021...........       550626
                                     05-0115P).             Village of Hobart, 2990 South   Avenue, Green Bay, WI 54313.    advanceSearch.
                                                            Pine Tree Road, Hobart, WI
                                                            54155.
    Ozaukee.......................  City of Cedarburg (19- The Honorable Mike O'Keefe,     City Hall, W63 N645 Washington  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Aug. 25, 2021..........       550312
                                     05-5425P).             Mayor, City of Cedarburg, W63   Avenue, Cedarburg, WI 53012.    advanceSearch.
                                                            N645 Washington Avenue,
                                                            Cedarburg, WI 53012.
    Ozaukee.......................  Unincorporated Areas   Mr. Lee Schlenvogt,             Ozaukee County Administration   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Aug. 25, 2021..........       550310
                                     of Ozaukee County      Chairperson, Ozaukee County     Center, 121 West Main Street,   advanceSearch.
                                     (19-05-5425P).         Board, 121 West Main Street,    Port Washington, WI 53074.
                                                            Port Washington, WI 53074.
    Ozaukee.......................  Village of Grafton     Mr. James A. Brunnquell,        Village Hall, 1971 Washington   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/     Aug. 25, 2021..........       550314
                                     (19-05-5425P).         Village President, Village of   Street, Grafton, WY 53024.      advanceSearch.
                                                            Grafton, 860 Badger Circle,
                                                            Grafton, WI 53024.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2021-12127 Filed 6-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register: September 22, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 182)]
[Notices]
[Page 48259]
[DOCID:fr22se09-68]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-408-000]

PacifiCorp; Notice of Filing

September 15, 2009.
    Take notice that on September 4, 2009, PacifiCorp filed a request
that the Commission reinstitute the deferred section 205 proceeding
referenced above.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 25, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-22709 Filed 9-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P