[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 36769]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14599]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER13-1641-000]

Chestnut Flats Lessee, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding,
of Chestnut Flats Lessee, LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability is June 27, 2013.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: June 7, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-14599 Filed 6-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: January 26, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 15)]
[Notices]
[Page 4432-4433]
[DOCID:fr26ja09-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2008-0295; FRL-8767-4]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; NSPS for Grain Elevators
(Renewal), EPA ICR Number 1130.09, OMB Control Number 2060-0082

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR which is abstracted below describes the
nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before February 25,
2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2008-0295, to: (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov
(our preferred method), or by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(2) or by
mail to: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency,
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center, mail code
2201T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB
at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Learia Williams, Compliance Assessment
and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail Code 2223A,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(202) 564-0050; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On May 30, 2008 (73 FR 31088), EPA sought comments on this ICR
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any additional
comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days
of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OECA-2008-0295, which is available for public viewing
either online at http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at
the Enforcement and Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/
DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket is (202)
566-1927.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to http://
www.regulations.gov.
    Title: NSPS for Grain Elevators (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1130.09, OMB Control Number 2060-0082.
    ICR Status: This ICR is schedule to expire on March 31, 2009. Under
OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the
collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for grain
elevators were proposed on January 18, 1977 (40 CFR part 60, subpart
DD), promulgated on August 3, 1978, and amended on October 17, 2000 (65
FR 61759). These standards apply to each affected facility at any grain
terminal elevator or any grain storage elevator. The facilities are
each truck unloading station, truck loading station, barge and ship
loading station, railcar loading station, railcar unloading station,
grain dryer and all grain handling operations that commenced
construction, modification or reconstruction after August 3, 1978.

    Owners or operators of the affected facilities must make a one-
time-only report of the date of construction or reconstruction,
notification of the actual date of startup, notification of any
physical or operational change to existing facility that may increase
the rate of emission of the regulated pollutant, notification of
initial performance test; and results of initial performance test.
Owners or operators are also required to maintain records of the
occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction, or
any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative.
Performance tests are the Agency's records of a source's initial
capability to comply with emissions standards and not the operating
conditions under which compliance was to achieve. An annual summary
report is also required.
    Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this subpart
must maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at
least two years following the collection of such measurements,
maintenance reports, and records.
    All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority. In
the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are
sent directly to the EPA regional office. This information is being
collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 60, subpart DD, as
authorized in sections 112 and 114(a) of the Clean Air Act. The
required information consists of emissions data and other information
that have been determined to be private.
    An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for EPA
regulations listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15, are
identified on the form and/or instrument, if applicable.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information estimated to average 10 hours
per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose and provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information; processing and
maintaining information; and disclosing and providing information. All
existing ways will have to adjust to comply with any previously
applicable instructions and requirements that have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners and operators of grain
elevators.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 200.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion, initially and annually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 2,070.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $167,108, which is comprised of labor
costs inclusively, with neither capital/startup costs nor O&M costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is no change in the labor cost in
this ICR compared to the previous ICR. This is due to two
considerations. First, the regulations have not changed over the past
three years and are not anticipated to change over the next three
years. Secondly, the growth rate for the industry is very low, negative
or non-existent, so there is no significant change in the overall
burden.
    Since there are no changes in the regulatory requirements and there
is no significant industry growth, the labor hours and cost figures in
the previous ICR was used in this ICR, and there is no change in the
burden to industry.

    Dated: January 15, 2009.
John Moses,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
 [FR Doc. E9-1621 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 26300]
[FR Doc No: 2023-09046]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-10770-01-R6]

Notice of Proposed Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order
on Consent for Cost Reimbursement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), notice is hereby given
that a proposed CERCLA Section 122(h)(1) Settlement Agreement
(``Proposed Agreement'') associated with the ITC Tank Fire Superfund
Site in Deer Park, Harris County, Texas (``Site'') was executed by the
Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'') and is now subject to public
comment, after which EPA may modify or withdraw its consent if comments
received disclose facts or considerations that indicate that the
Proposed Agreement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The
Proposed Agreement would resolve potential EPA claims under Section
107(a) of CERCLA, against Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC
(``Settling Party'') for EPA response costs at the Deer Park Superfund
Site in Texas. The settlement is $5.25 million and was based on
negotiations which concluded with the settling party agreeing to make
partial payment for EPA response costs.
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this
notice, EPA will receive electronic comments relating to the Proposed
Agreement. EPA's response to any comments received will be available
for public inspection by request. Please see the ADDRESSES section of
this notice for special instructions in effect due to impacts related
to the COVID-19 pandemic.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 30, 2023.

ADDRESSES: As a result of impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic,
requests for documents and submission of comments must be via
electronic mail except as provided below. The Proposed Agreement and
additional background information relating to the Proposed Agreement
are available for public inspection upon request by contacting EPA
Assistant Regional Counsel Edwin Quinones at [email protected].
Comments must be submitted via electronic mail to this same email
address and should reference the ``ITC Tank Fire'' Superfund Site,
Proposed Settlement Agreement'' and ``EPA CERCLA Docket No. 06-03-23''.
Persons without access to electronic mail may call Mr. Quinones at
(214) 665-8035 to make alternative arrangements.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edwin Quinones at EPA by phone (214)
665-8035 or email at: [email protected].

Earthea Nance,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2023-09046 Filed 4-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6801-6803]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02327]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2014 /
Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0891; Airspace Docket No. 12-ASO-37]
RIN 2120-AA66

Establishment of Area Navigation (RNAV) Routes; Atlanta, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes nine low-altitude RNAV routes (T-
routes) in the Atlanta, GA, area. The new routes enhance the efficiency
of the National Airspace System (NAS) by providing routing through,
around and over the busy Atlanta terminal airspace and by providing
connectivity to the existing airway structure.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, April 3, 2014. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace Policy and
Regulations Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On November 15, 2013, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to establish nine new RNAV routes
in the Atlanta, GA area (78 FR 68777). Interested parties were invited
to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments
on the proposal. Four comments were received.

Discussion of Comments

    The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) and a pilot who
often flies in the area, both wrote in support of the proposal. Two
other commenters, the City of College Park, GA, and the Woodward
Academy, expressed concerns about the proximity of proposed route T-319
to the Woodward Academy campus in College Park, GA. The City and the
Academy stated concerns about possible environmental and related
economic impacts that might result from the establishment of the route.
Additionally, the City advised that they had not been informed as to
potential changes to the types and frequency of traffic along the path
due to the creation of T-319. The commenters also were concerned about
the potential impact of helicopter noise from T-319.
    Route T-319 is almost congruent with an existing VOR Federal airway
(V-97) which passes through the same area near the Woodward Academy
campus. Additionally, this area has long been used by air traffic
control (ATC) as a corridor to vector aircraft north and south over the
Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International airport (ATL). We do not
anticipate an increase in traffic with the establishment of T-319. Air
traffic is already utilizing that airspace. There are no plans to move
additional small propeller aircraft, small jets or helicopters over
this route. Further, the route is being established for aircraft
transiting through the area and is not intended for aircraft or
helicopters circling the area. Aircraft using T-319 will be assigned an
altitude of 5,000 feet MSL or 6,000 feet MSL as they are today in the
corridor. Additionally, with this RNAV route, ATC will be able to move
some traffic through the area at higher altitudes (e.g., 12,000 feet
MSL and 13,000 feet MSL). This should reduce the potential for noise
impacts. The commenters recommended that the FAA consider moving T-319
to the east along a line approximately 0.3 miles east of Harrison Road
(the east edge of the City). Regarding the placement of T-319, the
route must be located as proposed in the NPRM so that separation can be
provided between the transiting traffic and ATL departures that are
climbing to 10,000 feet MSL when ATL is on either an east or west
operation.

Differences from the NPRM

    The description of T-297 in the NPRM contained a one minute error
in the longitude coordinate of the RKMRT, GA, waypoint. The NPRM read
``long. 85[deg]14'03'' W.'' The correct point is ``long. 85[deg]15'03''
W.''
    The NPRM stated that this action would support the Atlanta
Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in a Metroplex (OAPM) Project.
That statement resulted in some confusion over the status of the T-
route proposal versus the Metroplex project. While these new routes
will enhance airspace efficiency in the Atlanta terminal area, the T-
routes in this rule have independent utility from the Metroplex
project, and environmental evaluations were conducted independently.

The Rule

    The FAA is amending Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 to establish nine low altitude RNAV routes (T-routes) in the
Atlanta, GA, area to provide published routes for aircraft to use to
circumnavigate the busy Atlanta terminal area airspace. The new routes
are described below.
    T-290: T-290 provides a route south of Atlanta from the SCAIL, AL,
waypoint (WP), near Tallapoosa County, AL, to the JACET, GA, WP, near
Augusta, GA.
    T-292: T-292 provides a route to the north of Atlanta from the
RKMRT, GA, WP (near Polk County Airport, GA) to the JACET, GA, WP.
    T-293: T-293 extends around the west of the Atlanta area from the
CHUTT, AL, WP, in Alabama (south of Columbus, GA) to the DAISI, GA, WP
(near Pickens County Airport, GA [JZP]). Aligning the route segments
between the RTLRY, HONRR and POLLL waypoints keeps T-293 within Atlanta
TRACON's airspace and provides vertical and lateral separation from
three separate published arrival procedures used by aircraft descending
to land at airports within the Metroplex area.
    T-294: T-294 provides an alternative RNAV route through the Atlanta
area on the southwest side, between the GRANT, GA, WP (near Thomaston,
GA) and the HEFIN, AL, WP (near Heflin, AL).

    T-296: T-296 provides a route southeast of Atlanta between the
JMPPR, GA, WP (near Woodbury, GA) and the TACKL, GA, WP (southwest of
Athens, GA).
    T-297: T-297 provides an alternative route around the west side of
the Atlanta area between the PAIRA, GA, WP (south of Atlanta, near
Geneva, GA) and the REELL, GA, WP (northwest of Athens, GA). The route
has altitude limitations so that T-297 flights are procedurally
separated from all optimized published departure and arrival
procedures.
    T-319: T-319 provides an RNAV route directly over the Hartsfield-
Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL) for aircraft transitioning
Class B airspace from north-to-south and vice versa.
    T-321: T-321 provides a north-south oriented route east of ATL,
between the BBOAT, GA, WP (near Eatonton, GA) and the BIGNN, GA, WP
(abeam Habersham County, GA). The BBOAT and BIGNN waypoints also
connect to T-290 and T-323, respectively, enabling more flexibility in
routing options.
    T-323: T-323 allows aircraft to transition the Atlanta area between
a point approximately 110 NM northeast of ATL from the HIGGI, NC, WP
and a point 110 NM southeast of ATL at the CROCS, GA, WP. T-323
intersects the new T-290 and T-321 enabling alternative routing between
the Knoxville, TN, area and locations south of the Atlanta area.
    These new T-routes provide access through, around and over the
Atlanta terminal area that are procedurally deconflicted from arrivals,
departures and other airspace areas. This will benefit the efficiency
and safety of the NAS by establishing published routes that are more
direct and by reducing air traffic controller and pilot workload.
    Low altitude RNAV routes are published in paragraph 6011 of FAA
Order 7400.9X dated August 7, 2013, and effective September 15, 2013,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The RNAV routes
listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so
minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it modifies the route structure as required to enhance the
safe and efficient flow of air traffic in the Atlanta, GA area.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9X,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 7, 2013, and
effective September 15, 2013, is amended as follows:

    Paragraph 6011--United States Area Navigation Routes.

* * * * *

T-290 SCAIL, AL to JACET, GA [New]

 SCAIL, AL              WP                     (lat. 33[deg]02'01'' N., long. 85[deg]39'32'' W.)
BBAIT, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]07'14'' N., long. 84[deg]46'13'' W.)
BBASS, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]11'33'' N., long. 83[deg]59'21'' W.)
BBOAT, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]16'51'' N., long. 83[deg]28'10'' W.)
BOBBR, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]19'57'' N., long. 83[deg]08'19'' W.)
JACET, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]29'41'' N., long. 82[deg]06'28'' W.)

T-292 RKMRT, GA to JACET, GA [New]

RKMRT, GA               WP                     (lat. 34[deg]03'37'' N., long. 85[deg]15'03'' W.)
POLLL, GA               WP                     (lat. 34[deg]08'57'' N., long. 84[deg]46'50'' W.)
CCATT, GA               WP                     (lat. 34[deg]16'15'' N., long. 84[deg]09'05'' W.)
REELL, GA               WP                     (lat. 34[deg]01'33'' N., long. 83[deg]31'44'' W.)
TRREE, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]47'15'' N., long. 82[deg]55'30'' W.)
JACET, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]29'41'' N., long. 82[deg]06'28'' W.)

T-293 CHUTT, AL to DAISI, GA [New]

CHUTT, AL               WP                     (lat. 32[deg]13'23'' N., long. 85[deg]03'06'' W.)
NFTRY, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]02'03'' N., long. 85[deg]09'06'' W.)
RTLRY, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]45'18'' N., long. 85[deg]07'48'' W.)
HONRR, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]57'35'' N., long. 85[deg]01'28'' W.)

POLLL, GA               WP                     (lat. 34[deg]08'57'' N., long. 84[deg]46'50'' W.)
DAISI, GA               WP                     (lat. 34[deg]26'08'' N., long. 84[deg]25'51'' W.)

T-294 HEFIN, AL to GRANT, GA [New]

HEFIN, AL               Fix                    (lat. 33[deg]35'55'' N., long. 85[deg]25'11'' W.)
BBAIT, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]07'14'' N., long. 84[deg]46'13'' W.)
JMPPR, GA               WP                     (lat. 32[deg]57'42'' N., long. 84[deg]33'19'' W.)
GRANT, GA               Fix                    (lat. 32[deg]49'45'' N., long. 84[deg]22'36'' W.)

T-296 JMPPR, GA to TACKL, GA [New]

JMPPR, GA               WP                     (lat. 32[deg]57'42'' N., long. 84[deg]33'19'' W.)
BBASS, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]11'33'' N., long. 83[deg]59'21'' W.)
TATRS, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]20'37'' N., long. 83[deg]51'37'' W.)
TACKL, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]44'25'' N., long. 83[deg]30'31'' W.)

T-297 PAIRA, GA to REELL, GA [New]

PAIRA, GA               WP                     (lat. 32[deg]31'48'' N., long. 84[deg]31'42'' W.)
NFTRY, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]02'03'' N., long. 85[deg]09'06'' W.)
HEFIN, AL               Fix                    (lat. 33[deg]35'55'' N., long. 85[deg]25'11'' W.)
RKMRT, GA               WP                     (lat. 34[deg]03'37'' N., long. 85[deg]15'03'' W.)
CHTTE, GA               WP                     (lat. 34[deg]23'18'' N., long. 84[deg]52'55'' W.)
DAISI, GA               WP                     (lat. 34[deg]26'08'' N., long. 84[deg]25'51'' W.)
AWSON. GA               Fix                    (lat. 34[deg]28'49'' N., long. 83[deg]59'03'' W.)
REELL, GA               WP                     (lat. 34[deg]01'33'' N., long. 83[deg]31'44'' W.)

T-319 CCLAY, GA to BLEWW, GA [New]

CCLAY, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]18'11'' N., long. 84[deg]24'41'' W.)
DUNCS, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]27'34'' N., long. 84[deg]25'23'' W.)
SHURT, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]32'13'' N., long. 84[deg]25'50'' W.)
KLOWD, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]43'59'' N., long. 84[deg]26'05'' W.)
BLEWW, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]58'14'' N., long. 84[deg]25'43'' W.)

T-321 BBOAT, GA to BIGNN, GA [New]

BBOAT, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]16'51'' N., long. 83[deg]28'10'' W.)
TACKL, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]44'25'' N., long. 83[deg]30'31'' W.)
REELL, GA               WP                     (lat. 34[deg]01'33'' N., long. 83[deg]31'44'' W.)
BIGNN, GA               WP                     (lat. 34[deg]20'34'' N., long. 83[deg]33'07'' W.)

T-323 CROCS, GA to HIGGI, NC [New]

CROCS, GA               WP                     (lat. 32[deg]27'18'' N., long. 82[deg]46'29'' W.)
BOBBR, GA               WP                     (lat. 33[deg]19'57'' N., long. 83[deg]08'19'' W.)
BIGNN, GA               WP                     (lat. 34[deg]20'34'' N., long. 83[deg]33'07'' W.)
ZPPLN, NC               WP                     (lat. 34[deg]59'47'' N., long. 83[deg]49'38'' W.)
HIGGI, NC               WP                     (lat. 35[deg]26'47'' N., long. 83[deg]46'41'' W.)

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 29, 2014.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2014-02327 Filed 2-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35104-35106]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14922]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0433]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Waterway Closure, Atchafalaya River From Mile Marker
117 (Morgan City Railroad Bridge) to Mile Marker 0 (Simmesport, LA)

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone
closing the Atchafalaya River to all commercial traffic from MM 117
(Morgan City Railroad Bridge) to MM 0 (Simmesport, LA). This temporary
safety zone is needed to protect the general public, vessels and tows
from destruction, and the levee system from destruction, loss or injury
due to hazards associated with rising flood water.

DATES: Effective Date: this rule is effective in the CFR from June 16,
2011 until 11:59 p.m. July 31, 2011. This rule is effective with actual
notice for purposes of enforcement beginning 12:01 a.m. May 16, 2011
through 11:59 p.m. July 31, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0433 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0433 the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant (LT) Russell Pickering, Coast
Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because publishing a NPRM would be
impracticable since immediate action is needed to protect the general
public, levee system, vessels and tows from the hazards associated with
rising flood water on the Atchafalaya River.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Publishing a NPRM and delaying its
effective date would be impracticable since immediate action is needed
to protect the general public, levee system, vessels and tows from
destruction, loss or injury due to the

hazards associated with rising flood water in the Atchafalaya River.

Basis and Purpose

    Captain of the Port Morgan City, Louisiana has determined that
there is a need to establish a temporary safety zone due to high water.
This temporary safety zone is needed to protect the general public,
levee system, vessels and tows from destruction, loss or injury from
flood waters and associated hazards.

Discussion of Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary Safety Zone in the
Atchafalaya River for all commercial traffic from MM 117 (Morgan City
Railroad Bridge) to MM 0 (Simmesport, LA). Vessels and tows may not
enter this zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Morgan
City or designated representative.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
    Although this regulation will restrict access to the area, the
effect of the rule will not be significant because vessels requiring
entry into or passage through the Safety Zone may request permission
from the Captain of the Port Morgan City, or a designated
representative and entry will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to
minimize impact and protect the general public, levee system, vessels
and tows from destruction, loss or injury due to the hazards associated
with rising flood water. Notifications to the marine community will be
made through broadcast notices to mariners and Local Notices to
Mariners and Marine Safety Information Bulletins.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit through the Safety Zone from May 16, 2011 through July 31,
2011. This temporary safety zone is not expected to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because
vessels and tows requiring entry into or passage through the temporary
safety zone may request permission from the Captain of the Port Morgan
City, or a designated representative. If you are a small business
entity and are significantly affected by this regulation, please
contact LT Russell Pickering, Marine Safety Unit Morgan City, at (985)
380-5334.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not

likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement
of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)
(g.), of the Instruction. This rule involves an emergency situation and
will be in effect for over one week, but is not expected to result in
any significant adverse environmental impact as described in NEPA.
    An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination will be provided and made available at the docket as
indicated in the ADDRESSES section.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (Water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. A new temporary Sec.  165.T08-0433 is added to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T08-0433  Safety Zone; Waterway Closure, Atchafalaya River
from Mile Marker 117 (Morgan City Railroad Bridge) to Mile Marker 0
(Simmesport, LA).

    (a) Location. This temporary safety zone is located on the
specified waters of the Atchafalaya River between MM 117 (Morgan City
Railroad Bridge) and MM 0 (Simmesport, LA).
    (b) Effective date. This rule is effective May 16, 2011 through
July 31, 2011 and enforceable with actual notice upon signature, May
16, 2011.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Morgan City.
    (2) Vessels requiring entry into or passage through the Safety Zone
must request permission from the Captain of the Port Morgan City, or a
designated representative. They may be contacted on VHF Channel 13 or
16, or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port Morgan City and designated on-scene patrol
personnel. On-scene patrol personnel include commissioned, warrant, and
petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard.

    Dated: May 16, 2011.
J.C. Burton,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Morgan City, Louisiana.
E.M. Stanton,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port New Orleans, Louisiana.
[FR Doc. 2011-14922 Filed 6-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 172 (Friday, September 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53600-53601]
[FR Doc No: 2015-21957]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-75793; File No. SR-NYSE-2015-37]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Its Price List To Raise the NYSE Crossing Session II Fee Cap

August 31, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on August 21, 2015, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE''
or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to raise the NYSE
Crossing Session II (``NYSE CSII'') fee cap. The Exchange proposes to
implement the fee change effective September 1, 2015. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to raise the NYSE
CSII fee cap.
    Currently, the Exchange charges a fee of $0.0004 per share for
executions in CSII.\4\ Fees for executions in CSII are capped at
$100,000 per month per member organization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ CSII runs on the Exchange from 4:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.
Eastern Time and handles member organization crosses of baskets of
securities of aggregate-priced buy and sell orders. See NYSE Rules
900-907.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to increase the monthly fee cap from $100,000
to $200,000. The $0.0004 per share fee for executions in CSII would
remain unchanged.
    The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other
issues, and the Exchange is not aware of any problems that member
organizations would have in complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\5\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\ in
particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and
other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed increase in the monthly fee
cap for CSII transactions is reasonable and an equitable allocation of
fees because all similarly situated member organizations will be
subject to the same fee structure and access to the Exchange's market
is offered on fair and non-discriminatory terms. The Exchange also
believes that maintaining a cap for member organizations that are
particularly active during NYSE CSII is reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory. The Exchange notes that the last time this cap
was changed was in 2012.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66600 (March 14,
2012), 77 FR 16298 (March 20, 2012) (SR-NYSE-2012-07).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that it is subject to significant competitive
forces,

as described below in the Exchange's statement regarding the burden on
competition.
    For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal
is consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\8\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Rather, the increase in the fee cap for member
organizations that are particularly active in CS II would not burden
competition because it would apply to all member organizations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust
its fees and rebates to remain competitive with other exchanges and
with alternative trading systems that have been exempted from
compliance with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges.
Because competitors are free to modify their own fees and credits in
response, and because market participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which
fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is
extremely limited. As a result of all of these considerations, the
Exchange does not believe that the proposed changes will impair the
ability of member organizations or competing order execution venues to
maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \9\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-
4 \10\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \11\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2015-37 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2015-37. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2015-37, and should be
submitted on or before September 25, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-21957 Filed 9-3-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P