[Federal Register: April 2, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 64)]
[Notices]
[Page 18016-18018]
[DOCID:fr02ap08-106]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57568; File No. SR-CBOE-2008-32]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Related to Off-Floor DPMs

March 26, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on March 24, 2008, the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the

``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the Exchange.
The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed
rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend CBOE rules relating to DPMs. The
text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, at the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and at http://www.cboe.org/Legal.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Last year, CBOE amended its rules to provide DPMs with the
flexibility to operate remotely away from CBOE's trading floor as a so-
called ``Off-Floor DPM.'' \5\ At the time, CBOE stated that a DPM could
function as an Off-Floor DPM in equity option classes. CBOE now
proposes to amend its rules to provide DPMs with the same flexibility
to operate as an Off-Floor DPM in any option class traded on the Hybrid
Trading System and Hybrid 2.0 Platform. Specifically, CBOE proposes to
amend CBOE Rule 8.80 and CBOE Rule 8.83, which describe the option
classes in which an Off-Floor DPM can function.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55531 (March 26,
2007), 72 FR 15736 (April 2, 2007) (SR-CBOE-2006-94) (the ``original
filing'').
    \6\ CBOE also proposes to amend CBOE Rule 6.45B to clarify, as
it did CBOE Rule 6.45A in the original filing, that the DPM
participation entitlement for orders represented in open outcry is
only applicable to an On-Floor DPM. See CBOE Rules 8.83 and 8.87.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CBOE proposes to clarify that an Off-Floor DPM can function in
option classes traded on the Hybrid 2.0 Platform \7\ in addition to the
Hybrid Trading System.\8\ At the time CBOE's rule filing to allow Off-
Floor DPMs was approved, CBOE's trading platforms included the Hybrid
Trading System and the Hybrid 2.0 Platform, the latter of which was
encompassed in the definition of Hybrid Trading System under CBOE Rule
1.1(aaa). Later in 2007, however, CBOE established a new trading
platform--the Hybrid 3.0 Platform.\9\ Accordingly, CBOE wishes to
clarify that Off-Floor DPMs can function in the Hybrid Trading System
and the Hybrid 2.0 Platform, but not the Hybrid 3.0 Platform.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Hybrid 2.0 Platform is an enhanced platform that allows
remote quoting by authorized categories of members.
    \8\ See CBOE Rule 1.1(aaa).
    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55874 (June 7,
2007), 72 FR 32688 (June 13, 2007) (SR-CBOE-2006-101).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By expanding the types of option classes in which an Off-Floor DPM
can function, CBOE believes that the rule change will provide
flexibility to member organizations that may wish to function remotely
in various types of option classes. It will further provide flexibility
to CBOE when allocating option classes, as CBOE could determine to
allocate non-equity option classes to a DPM or an Off-Floor DPM.
Expanding the category of option classes in which a DPM can function as
an Off-Floor DPM also removes a potential operational issue for a DPM
that has been allocated equity and non-equity option classes. Absent
this change to CBOE's rules, a DPM organization that is approved to
function as an Off-Floor DPM would need to maintain a presence on the
trading floor as a DPM for its non-equity option classes, while being
permitted to function as an Off-Floor DPM in its equity option classes.
Accordingly, CBOE believes that the proposed rule change is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade and also promotes
efficiency.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations under the Act applicable to a
national securities exchange and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.\10\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \11\ that the rules of an exchange be designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposal.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing rule does not (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, provided that the self-regulatory organization
has given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \12\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\13\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of
such proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such
rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the Act
requires a self-regulatory organization to give written notice of a
proposed rule change filed pursuant to this subsection at least five
business days prior to filing. CBOE complied with this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.

Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2008-32 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2008-32. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2008-32 and should be
submitted on or before April 23, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary. 6
 [FR Doc. E8-6733 Filed 4-1-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 160 (Monday, August 19, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50369-50370]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20157]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2010-0566; FRL-9900-18-Region 5]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Michigan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 6, 2013, EPA proposed to approve revisions to the
State of Michigan's Clean Air Act State Implementation Plan (SIP) that
Michigan had submitted on March 24, 2009. Michigan's submittal included
revisions to Part 1, Definitions; Part 2, Air Use Approval; and Part
19, New Source Review for Sources Impacting Nonattainment Areas, of the
Michigan rules. EPA is revising the February 6, 2013, proposed approval
to announce that we will not take action on the changes to Part 2 Air
Use Approval rules and of the Part 2 revision submittals on November
12, 1993, May 16, 1996, April 3, 1998, September 2, 2003, and March 24,
2009, at this time. EPA is proposing to rescind Michigan's rule
336.1220 from its SIP. Michigan included this request to rescind this
portion of the rule in its March 24, 2009, submittal as part of the
Part 19 New Source Review rule approval. The rescission of rule
336.1220 will eliminate having differing nonattainment rules in the
State SIP.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 18, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2010-0566, by one of the following methods:
    1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    4. Mail: Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    5. Hand Delivery: Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2010-0566. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
instructions on submitting comments, go to Section I of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
We recommend that you telephone Constantine Blathras, Environmental
Engineer, at<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Constantine Blathras, Environmental
Engineer, Air Permits, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.

I. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    When submitting comments, remember to:
    1. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    2. Follow directions--EPA may ask you to respond to specific
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    3. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    4. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    5. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    6. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
    7. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    8. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.

II. What action is EPA taking?

    On February 6, 2013, EPA proposed to approve revisions to Part 1,
Definitions; Part 2, Air Use Approval; and Part 19, New Source Review
for Sources Impacting Nonattainment Areas, into the State of Michigan's
SIP (78 FR 8485). With this notice, EPA is withdrawing our proposed
action to approve the revisions to Michigan Part 2, Air Use Approval,
into the Michigan SIP. The proposed approval of the Michigan Part 1 and
Part 19 rules remains as proposed in the February 6, 2013, rulemaking
action.
    EPA is also proposing to rescind Michigan rule 336.1220 from the
Michigan SIP. On March 6, 2013, Michigan submitted a letter to EPA
regarding their March 24, 2009, submittal and its request to rescind
rule 336.1220. This rule contains Michigan's current permitting rule
for major sources of air pollution located in nonattainment areas. This
rule is being rescinded and replaced with Part 19 which contains rules
reflecting current Federal permitting requirements for major sources of
air pollution in nonattainment areas. The new rules reflect all recent
changes to Federal nonattainment area New Source Review rules that were
promulgated by EPA. On December 31, 2002, EPA published revisions to
the Federal Prevention of Significant Deterioration and nonattainment
area New Source Review regulations in 40 CFR Parts 51 and 52 (67 FR
80186). These revisions are commonly referred to as ``NSR Reform''
regulations and became effective on March 3, 2003. EPA is now
soliciting comments on the proposed rescission of rule 336.1220 from
the Michigan SIP.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: August 7, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2013-20157 Filed 8-16-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Provide the following additional information and documentation:
   1. A statement as to whether Tully seeks an interim order for its permanent variance request.  If granted, an interim order will permit Tully to operate under the alternate decompression conditions specified in the variance application, and any other conditions OSHA requires, until OSHA makes a final determination regarding the variance application.
Tully/OHL USA JV is seeking an interim order for its permanent variance request.
   2. Information about Tully's partners in its present joint ventures, including the name, mailing and email addresses, and telephone number for a designated project representative for each partner.  Note that the variance, if granted, will apply only to named employers (including subcontractors); if not named, the variance would not cover any of their employees exposed to the alternate decompression conditions.
   * OHL USA Inc.
780 Third Av. 9[th] Floor
New York, NY-10017
Tel.<PHONE_NUMBER> /<PHONE_NUMBER>

Mr. Luis Alonso
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
   * Ballard Diving & Salvage
               800 NE Tenney Rd
               Suite 110-530
      Vancouver WA 98685
      Tel.<PHONE_NUMBER>

      Mr. Joe Olsen
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
   3. A projected start date for the tunneling work.
Tunneling work has already started on July 25[th] 2012. First hyperbaric work is scheduled by October 16[th].

   4. A projected date by which Tully will be able to provide on-site training to local emergency responders to ensure the availability of trained personnel ready to provide emergency assistance to Tully if needed, including assistance during emergencies related to hyperbaric exposures.
Tully-OHL USA JV has already started that process with FDNY, they are aware of the emergency plans and they are following the performance of the tunnel. Staten Island FDNY has also a rescue team specialized in confined spaces, they know the project and visit it on a regular basis.
Tully-OHL USA JV will have  medical staff on site during hyperbaric inspections.
   5. Information about whether Tully provided project training to compliance safety and health officers in State-Plan states in the past and, if so, whether it will provide such training to OSHA's compliance safety and health officers and national-office personnel, and an approximate date by which it will do so.
We'll notify local compliance office when training takes place by Ballard Diving (Hyperbaric expert) and we'll be glad to invite him to attend.
Monday October 15[th]  Ballard will provide first training on site.
   6. Information regarding the hyperbaric-design features for the tunnel-boring machine and all associated components such as piping, including whether the machine and its components meet ASME standards and specifications or, if not, how the hyperbaric design features of the machine and components compare to ASME standards and specifications.
See attached document from CATERPILLAR.
Sent to Amanda L. Edens (Director of Technical Support and Emergency Management).
   7. Information about whether a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) tested and certified the tunnel-boring machine or its components in accordance with OSHA standards such as 29 CFR 1926.403(a) and (b) and 1926.449 and, if so, to which test standards.
See attached document from CATERPILLAR.
Sent to Amanda L. Edens (Director of Technical Support and Emergency Management).
   8. A detailed description of the dual-chamber man locks and how the man locks differ from the requirements contained in 29 CFR 1926.803(g)(2).  Include the number of planned occupants of a man lock, the volume of a man lock, and the estimated cubic feet of airspace allotted per worker in a man lock.
See attached document from CATERPILLAR.
Sent to Amanda L. Edens (Director of Technical Support and Emergency Management).
   9. A description of the precautions Tully will implement to keep intake-ventilation air compressors away from possible sources of contamination, such as truck exhaust.
      * There will be no operation performed in the vicinity of the compressor intakes that will contaminate the compressed air supply.  These prohibited operations would include welding, burning, running unnecessary engines, volatile chemical use or any other processes that could create hazardous atmosphere in the compressed air environment.
      * The air intakes to the air compressors are located and positioned so that exhaust fumes from diesel or gasoline powered engines are not drawn into the intakes.
      * The Plant Manager will check conditions around intakes for all air compressors to ensure that diesel or gasoline engines are not operating in the area prior to and during all hyperbaric interventions.
      * The air compressors are equipped with carbon monoxide (CO) monitors.

   10. A description of whether Tully will use, transport, and store compressed gases in the tunnel in accordance with OSHA standards such as 29 CFR 1926.800(m) and (n), and how Tully would accomplish these tasks in this setting.
Oxygen will be used during decompression.  This will require oxygen cylinders to be transported into the tunnel.

  1. Only qualified personnel will supervise transport of breathing oxygen within the tunnel.
  2. A suitable maximum quantity of oxygen will be calculated for normal operation and this volume will not be exceeded for storage purposes.
  3. Oxygen cylinders, when not manifolded at a lock position, will be stored in a designated area on the surface in a protected, clearly marked area.
  4. The location of all surface stored oxygen will be clearly marked on a site plan that will be made available to responding Fire and Emergency Services.
  5. Used or partially used cylinders will be stored on site for the minimum time possible.
  6. High Pressure Oxygen will only remain in the tunnel while compressed air exposures are in progress.  It will not be stored in-tunnel under any circumstances.
  7. The oxygen distribution system design is such that no high pressure connection or disconnection takes place in the tunnel.
  8. Oxygen pressure is regulated to the lowest possible pressure as close as possible to the oxygen cylinder.
  9. Defective or leaking cylinders will be isolated, marked and removed from underground areas immediately.
  10. All oxygen cylinders will be properly secured.

   11. A statement as to whether Tully expects methane gas or other potentially flammable atmospheric gases to be present in the tunnel (at concentrations between the lower and upper explosive limits) and, if so, what precautions Tully will take to avoid explosions.
No methane gas or other potencially flammable atmospheric is expected as per Geotechnical Baseline Report or any other information.
TBM also has a gas detector system implemented.
   12. A description of any hot work Tully will perform in the tunnel, including a description of the hot-work permit system Tully will use (see OSHA's standard regarding permit-required confined spaces at 29 CFR 1910.146(e) for guidance on how to structure a permit system).
No hot work is expected under hyperbaric conditions.
   13. If known, the approximate frequency of planned interventions under hyperbaric conditions that Tully anticipates in this project.
2 Expected interventions. 1 every 3 months.
   14. Your application states that the tunnel "will require compressed air work with only three workers at a time, and only for cutterhead inspection; and limited maintenance and replacement of tools."  However, elsewhere your application states that "the tunnel could be exposed to pressures of up to 58 psi (4 bar) and all equipment and procedures will be designed for the full potential pressure of 58 psi (4 bar)" (both statements come from your cover letter, page 2). Provide clarification on whether Tully will pressurize the entire tunnel or just the cutting face and , if it pressurizes the entire tunnel, clarify if all workers in the tunnel will undergo hyperbaric exposure or just the workers performing interventions in the working chamber.
Only the cutting face (excavation chamber) is pressurized during normal excavation mode.  During maintenance, the motor chamber, located adjacent to the excavation chamber, is also pressurized.  The manlock is then pressurized to permit the passage of the three workers into the pressurized work area.  These three chambers are the only sections of the tunnel boring machine that are pressurized.  The tunnel itself is never pressurized and only the workers performing interventions in the working chamber undergo hyperbaric exposure.
   15. Information regarding the maximum pressure and working time at which employees will conduct interventions under hyperbaric conditions, expressed in both units of bar and psig.
The maximum anticipated pressure is 4 bar (approx. 58 psig). The French Tables permit a working time of 1 hour at that pressure.
   16. Information about whether Tully will be using diving subcontractors other than Ballard Diving & Hyperbaric Services to perform work under hyperbaric conditions while employees conduct interventions and, if possible, the identification of those subcontractors.
Ballard Diving & Hyperbaric Services will be the only diving subcontractor to perform work under hyperbaric conditions while employees conduct interventions.
   17. Information about which medical personnel will be on-site, including what periods they will be on-site (e.g., will such personnel always be on-site during interventions).
A minimum of one physician will be on-call at all times when workers are engaged in compressed air work and for a minimum of twenty-four (24) hours after the last workers have completed decompression.  The physician or a physician's assistant under the physician's direction will be on site during all interventions and for five hours after the last worker has completed his decompression.
   18. Information about any certifications held by the man-lock attendants, hyperbaric-operations manager, man-lock tenders, surface man-lock tenders, and medical attendants, and whether any of these certifications include training in the compression and decompression protocols specified in Tully's variance application.
All man-lock attendants, hyperbaric-operations managers, man-lock tenders, surface man-lock tenders, and medical attendants hold one or more of the following certifications:
   * Commercial diving certification
   * Diving Medical Technician (DMT)
   * Life Support Technician (LST)
Each of the above certifications include training in compression and decompression theory and protocols.  Additionally, all of the above listed personnel have undergone additional training in the use of the specific protocols specified in this variance application, including the use of the French decompression tables.

   19. Information about Tully's hyperbaric physician, including: whether the physician is board certified in undersea and hyperbaric medicine; the location of the physician during periods when employees are conducting interventions under hyperbaric conditions, and during decompression and treatment of hyperbaric-related injuries/illnesses (when necessary); and the hours the physician will be at this location.
A minimum of one physician, board certified in undersea and hyperbaric medicine, will be on-call at all times when workers are engaged in compressed air work and for a minimum of twenty-four (24) hours after the last workers have completed decompression.  The physician or a physician's assistant under the physician's direction will be on site during all interventions and for five hours after the last worker has completed his decompression.

   20. Information about any additional medical support Tully is arranging, including any arrangements with local emergency-medical services or a hospital emergency department with hyperbaric chambers, and any arrangements for transport of employees requiring treatment for hyperbaric-related injuries and illnesses.
   * Compressed Air Medical Services, LLC
      5050 NE HOYT #203
      Portland, Oregon 97213

   * Richmond University Medical Center
355 Barrd Ave.
Staten Island, NY 10310

   21. Describe the procedures that Tully will use to summon off-site medical resources, including the physician and emergency-medical services, and the estimated time it will take these resources to arrive on-site.
TBM has a phone system that can dial 911 and Rescue 5 dispatcher for emergency response and rescue.
TBM has also a radio system connecting tunnel and outside installations and also medical staff at site.
   22. Is Tully using trimix breathing gas while the workers are conducting interventions under hyperbaric conditions or for decompression?  If used during interventions, provide information on the rate of oxygen toxicity (in %) during these exposures.  If used for decompression, provide OSHA with a copy of the tables used and any supporting documentation, including peer-reviewed English-language documentation, addressing validation of the trimix decompression tables.
Trimix breathing gas will not be utilized for interventions.
   23. Describe when Tully will use the various French decompression tables (tables n2 and n3, and back-up tables for air decompression and oxygen decompression).  Will any compressed-air worker (CAW) have a repetitive hyperbaric exposure during any 24-hour period?  If so, what decompression procedure will Tully use for repetitive exposures?
The French Air Standard Tables  -  Air Decompression (Table n2) will be used for work at pressures from 0 to 1.05 bar.  The French Air Standard Tables  -  Oxygen Decompression (Table n3) will be used for work at pressures from 1.05 to 4.2 bar.  Table n2 will be used at pressures from 1.05 to 4.2 bar only in the event of a failure of the oxygen system.  The back-up tables are only for emergency use.  No repetitive exposures are permitted.
   24. Provide information and evidence (beyond anecdotal evidence) comparing decompression-illness and oxygen-toxicity rates (in %) experienced by divers and/or CAWs using the OSHA decompression tables and the French decompression tables (for both air and trimix breathing gases, if Tully will use trimix breathing gas) under similar hyperbaric work exposures (i.e., for similar working times and pressures).
See Exhibit 3 of the original submittal (French Tables 1992 Operational Results - Pechon) and attached paper (Optimum schedules for caisson decompression"  -  Kindwall, 1992).

Trimix will not be utilized on this project.
   25. Provide any written documentation supporting the claim that it is safe to allow decompression times up to 360 minutes in the tunnel-boring machine.  In addition, include a statement that at no point in the project will decompression times exceed 360 minutes.
The maximum decompression time under normal conditions using the French tables is 153 minutes.  This occurs at a pressure between 2.7 and 3.0 bar (approx. 39 - 43.5 psig), with a working time of 2 hours using table n3 (Oxygen decompression).  At no point in the project will decompression times exceed 153 minutes under normal conditions.
   26. Provide a description of the procedure Tully will use to decant a hyperbaric-exposed employee when transferring the employee from the man lock to the medical lock.
In the event of an emergency decompression profile being required from the TBM lock system in potentially life threatening circumstances, then this will take the form of omitted decompression, "decanting", from either working pressure or the current pressure level in decompression.

In this situation, where possible, workers should breathe oxygen via the BIBS system throughout the decompression.  The intention would be to complete as much of the decompression in the manlock as conditions and time allow, remove all workers from pressure in the TBM Lock, place the workers on oxygen, transport them directly to the Medical Lock and then be pressurized to a decompression or treatment pressure.

Workers would then be treated as per the Medical Advisor's recommendations.

NOTE:  Decanting is a last resort and should only be applied in extreme emergency and with the knowledge and advice of the Contract Medical Advisor.


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 128 (Thursday, July 3, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 37976]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15564]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0269; FRL-9911-00-Region 9]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Placer
County Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a revision to the Placer County portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns the necessary
procedures to create emission reduction credits from the reduction of
volatile organic compound (VOC), oxides of nitrogen (NOX),
oxides of sulfur (SOX), particulate matter (PM), and carbon
monoxide (CO) emissions due to the permanent curtailment of burning
rice straw.
    We are proposing to approve a local rule that provides
administrative procedures for creating emissions reduction credits,
consistent with Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) requirements.

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by August 4, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2014-0269, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
    Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901.
While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be
publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, (415) 942-
3848<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local
rule: Placer County Air Pollution Control District Rule 516, Rice Straw
Emission Reduction Credits. In the Rules and Regulations section of
this Federal Register, we are approving this local rule in a direct
final action without prior proposal because we believe these SIP
revisions are not controversial. If we receive adverse comments,
however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule
and address the comments in subsequent action based on this proposed
rule. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
    We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
information, please see the direct final action.

    Dated: April 25, 2014.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2014-15564 Filed 7-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 130 (Monday, July 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31777-31778]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14322]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0292; FRL-9963-16]

Lambda-Cyhalothrin; Receipt of Application for Emergency
Exemption, Solicitation of Public Comment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has received a specific exemption request from the
Washington State Department of Agriculture to use the pesticide lambda-
cyhalothrin (CAS No. 91465-08-6) to treat up to 7,000 acres of
asparagus to control the European asparagus aphid. The applicant
proposes a use which is supported by the Interregional Research Project
number 4 (IR-4) program and has been requested in 5 or more previous
years, and a petition for tolerance has not yet been submitted to the
Agency. Therefore, in accordance with regulatory requirements, EPA is
soliciting public comment before making the decision whether or not to
grant the exemption.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 25, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0292, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/where-send-comments-epa-dockets.

Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael L. Goodis, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets#tips.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticide
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.

II. What action is the Agency taking?

    Under section 18 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136p), at the discretion of the EPA
Administrator, a Federal or State agency may be exempted from any
provision of FIFRA if the EPA Administrator determines that emergency
conditions exist which require the exemption. The Washington State
Department of Agriculture has requested the EPA Administrator to issue
a specific exemption for the use of lambda-cyhalothrin on asparagus to
control the European asparagus aphid. Information in accordance with 40
CFR part 166 was submitted as part of the request.
    As part of the request, the applicant asserts that the cancellation
of the previously relied-upon tool, disulfoton, has left asparagus
growers in the state of Washington with no adequate alternatives to
control the European asparagus aphid, and significant economic losses
will occur without sufficient control.
    The Applicant proposes to make no more than 3 applications at a
maximum rate of 0.03 pounds (lb.) (total of 0.09 lb.) per acre of
lambda-cyhalothrin on up to 7,000 acres of asparagus grown in the state
of Washington from June 15 to October 30, 2017. Treatment of the
maximum acreage at the maximum rate would result in a total use of
lambda-cyhalothrin of 630 lbs.
    This notice does not constitute a decision by EPA on the
application itself. The regulations governing FIFRA section 18 at 40
CFR 166.32(a)(7), require publication of a notice of receipt of an
application for a specific exemption proposing a use which is supported
by the Inter-Regional Project Number 4 (IR-4) program and has been
requested in 5 or more previous years, and a petition for tolerance has
not yet been submitted to the Agency.
    The notice provides an opportunity for public comment on the
application. The Agency will review and consider all comments received
during the comment period in determining whether to issue the specific
exemption requested by the Washington State Department of Agriculture.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: June 8, 2017.
Michael L. Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2017-14322 Filed 7-7-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 218 (Thursday, November 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 69958]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28637]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER16-161-000]

New-Indy Oxnard LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding
New-Indy Oxnard LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is November 24, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 4, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-28637 Filed 11-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 8, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30399-30400]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11939]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0418; Airspace Docket No. 21-ACE-12]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; New Madrid, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at County Memorial Airport, New
Madrid, MO. The FAA is proposing this action as a result of an airspace
review caused by the decommissioning of the Malden Very High Frequency
Omnidirectional Range collocated with Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC)
navigation aid as part of the VOR Minimum Operational Network (MON)
Program. Controlled airspace is necessary for the safety and management
of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations in the area.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 23, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to: The U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify the
Docket No. FAA-2021-0418; Airspace Docket No. 21-ACE-12, at the
beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order 7400.11E Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; Telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11E at NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority,
as it amends Class E airspace in New Madrid, MO, to support IFR
operations in the area.

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to comment on this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (Docket No. FAA-
2021-0418 and Airspace Docket No. 21-ACE-12) and be submitted in
triplicate to DOT Docket Operations (see ADDRESSES section for the
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    Persons wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on
this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2021-0418; Airspace Docket No. 21-ACE-12.'' The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this document may be changed in light of the
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the comment
closing date. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined between 8:00 a.m. and
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays at the office
of the Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, Room
350, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and effective
September 15, 2020. FAA Order 7400.11E is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA proposes an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to amend Class E
airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface for County
Memorial Airport, New Madrid, MO, as the Malden VORTAC has been
decommissioned and all associated airspace extensions of Class E
airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface, off the
Malden VORTAC have been eliminated. The Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface would be amended by increasing
the radius to 10.3 miles (previously 6.3 miles).
    Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraph 6005, of
FAA Order 7400.11E, dated July 21, 2020, and effective September 15,
2020, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'', prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated July 21, 2020, and effective September 15, 2020, is
amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ACE MO E5 New Madrid, MO [Amend]

County Memorial Airport, New Madrid, MO
    (Lat. 36[deg]32'07'' N, long. 89[deg]35'59'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 10.3-mile radius of the County Memorial Airport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on June 3, 2021.
Andreese C. Davis,
Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2021-11939 Filed 6-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 62)]
[Notices]
[Page 16533-16534]
[DOCID:fr01ap10-129]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61787; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2010-015]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change To Apply Retroactively a Correction of a
Drafting Error in Rule 7018

March 26, 2010.

I. Introduction

    On January 26, 2010, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change that would
apply retroactively, to the period from July 24, 2009 through January
25, 2010, the correction made by SR-NASDAQ-2010-014 \3\ of a
``typographical error'' \4\ formerly in Rule 7018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61515 (February 12,
2010), 75 FR 7642 (February 22, 2010).
    \4\ The Commission notes that the ``typographical error'' is
more accurately characterized as a drafting error by Nasdaq that
resulted in the omission and misplacement of rule language.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal
Register on February 23, 2010.\5\ The Commission received no comments
on the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61524 (February 16,
2010), 75 FR 8160.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    In August 2009, Nasdaq filed SR-NASDAQ-2009-072,\6\ to make
clerical changes designed to streamline and simplify Rule 7018. In the
``Purpose'' section of the proposed rule change, Nasdaq stated ``[n]one
of the clerical changes will modify any fee assessed or credit earned
for trading on the NASDAQ Market Center.'' However, due to a drafting
error, Exhibit 5 to the proposed rule change (which sets out the actual
language of the proposed rule change) introduced changes to the fees
for orders in securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange
(``NYSE'') that are routed to other venues without attempting to
execute in Nasdaq for the full size of the order prior to routing.
Nasdaq has been billing members in accordance with the fees that were
in place before it filed SR-NASDAQ-2009-072. Nasdaq filed SR-NASDAQ-
2010-014 \7\ to correct the error; that proposed rule change was
effective upon filing with the Commission, and changed the fees from
the day it was filed (January 26, 2010) going forward. The instant
proposed rule change would apply the same changes retroactively to the
period from July 24, 2009 through January 25, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60430 (August 4, 2009),
74 FR 40279 (August 11, 2009).
    \7\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61515 (February 12,
2010), 75 FR 7642 (February 22, 2010) (SR-NASDAQ-2010-014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\8\ In
particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\9\ in general,
and with Section 6(b)(4) of the

Act,\10\ in particular, in that it provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and
issuers and other persons using any facility or system which Nasdaq
operates or controls. The proposed rule change would allow the fee
changes implemented by SR-NASDAQ-2010-014 to be applied retroactively
throughout the entire period when the error was in the rule.
Additionally, the proposed rule change would conform the text of the
rule to the description of the proposed rule change that Nasdaq
provided in SR-NASDAQ-2009-072, thereby eliminating any confusion as to
the appropriate fees and Nasdaq's intentions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission notes that it
received no comments on the proposal, and that Nasdaq stated it ``has
been billing members in accordance with the correct fees since the
effective date of SR-NASDAQ-2009-072 on July 24, 2009, and accordingly
believes that all of its members are cognizant of the correct fee.''
    The Commission urges Nasdaq to carefully proofread future proposed
rule changes before filing them with the Commission, to minimize errors
and the additional proposed rule changes required to correct them.

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\11\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2010-015), be, and it
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-7278 Filed 3-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 165 (Monday, August 26, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 44612]
[FR Doc No: 2019-18290]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP19-1353-000]

Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Technical Conference

    Take notice that a technical conference will be held on Tuesday,
September 24, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time), at a room to
be designated, at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington DC 20426.
    At the technical conference, the Commission Staff and the parties
to the proceeding should be prepared to discuss all issues raised by
the filing and set for technical conference by the Commission in its
July 31, 2019 order, Northern Natural Gas Co., 168 FERC ] 61,069. All
interested persons are permitted to attend.
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please
send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll free 1-866-208-
3372 (voice) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY); or send a fax to<PHONE_NUMBER> with
the required accommodations.
    For more information about this technical conference please contact
Cyril McNeill at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: August 20, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-18290 Filed 8-23-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: September 19, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 181)]
[Notices]
[Page 53614-53615]
[DOCID:fr19se07-131]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-56390; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2007-075]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Regarding Fees for the VTE Terminal

September 12, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 30, 2007, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been substantially prepared by Nasdaq. Nasdaq has filed the
proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon filing
with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Nasdaq proposes to modify the pricing for its members using the VTE
terminal to connect to the Nasdaq Market Center and to make other
clarifying changes to the relevant rule text. Nasdaq proposes to
implement the proposed rule change on October 1, 2007. The text of the
proposed rule change is available at Nasdaq, the Commission's Public
Reference Room, and http://www.nasdaq.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing is to modify fees for Nasdaq members
using the VTE terminal (formerly the INET terminal), to move the rule
text under existing Rule 7034 to Rule 7015, and to make other
clarifying changes to the relevant rule text.
    The VTE terminal is a former INET protocol that is used by Nasdaq
members to connect to, and enter orders in, The Nasdaq Market Center.
Since Nasdaq acquired INET, VTE users have paid a $50 monthly fee for
access to the terminal via an Internet connection (which is optional)
and a $50 monthly minimum commission fee for users executing orders
totaling less than 100,000 shares per month. In addition, VTE users pay
the exchanges directly for data feeds and services provided by Nasdaq
and other exchanges or market centers through VTE at the Commission-
approved rate that they would pay to receive the data feeds through
other means. The data feeds provide information that is necessary for
users to enter orders through VTE.
    Nasdaq is increasing the monthly fee for accessing the VTE terminal
through the Internet from $50 to $100 per month per user. In addition,
Nasdaq is increasing the monthly minimum commission fee for users
executing orders totaling less that 100,000 shares per month from $50
to $100 per month per user. Users will continue to be charged directly
for Nasdaq and non-Nasdaq data feeds and services at Commission-
approved rates by the exchange or market center providing the service.
    Based on Nasdaq's operation of the VTE since it was acquired from
INET, Nasdaq believes that the pricing changes are warranted in order
to appropriately balance the demand for the product with increasing
platform, overhead, and technology infrastructure costs.
    The proposed rule change also moves the text of Rule 7034 to Rule
7015 ``Access Services'' to further consolidate access services fees in
one rule, removes references to access alternatives no longer in use
(dedicated FIX server and Brut Workstation), and updates the rule
language by replacing references to ``INET Terminal'' with the term
``VTE Terminal'' to reflect the new name of this protocol after Nasdaq
system integration.
    In addition, the proposed rule change also eliminates from the rule
text references to INET and the locations of data centers (because the
relevant fees do not vary based on data center location) and INET, and
eliminates the reference to and pricing for Instinet Portal (a product
now available from INET's former owner, Instinet, which INET was
supporting on a transitional basis).
2. Statutory Basis
    Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\5\ in general, and with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that the proposal provides for
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among its members and issuers and other persons using any facility or
system which Nasdaq operates or controls. Nasdaq believes that the fees
are reasonably allocated among members based on their usage of the
trading systems operated by Nasdaq, and are generally consistent with
fees charged by other market centers for comparable services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \7\ and

subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder \8\ because it establishes
or changes a due, fee, or other charge applicable only to a member
imposed by the self-regulatory organization. Accordingly, the proposal
is effective upon Commission receipt of the filing. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may
summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NASDAQ-2007-075 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2007-075. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of Nasdaq. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2007-075 and should
be submitted on or before October 10, 2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-18390 Filed 9-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68926-68927]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27324]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Sunshine Act Meeting

    The following notice of meeting is published pursuant to section
3(a) of the government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. 94-409), 5 U.S.C.
552b:

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

DATE AND TIME: December 19, 2019, 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 2C, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Agenda.
    * NOTE--Items listed on the agenda may be deleted without further
notice.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For a recorded message listing items struck from or added to the
meeting, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    This is a list of matters to be considered by the Commission. It
does not include a listing of all documents relevant to the items on
the agenda. All public documents, however, may be viewed on line at the
Commission's website at http://ferc.capitolconnection.org/ using the
eLibrary link, or may be examined in the Commission's Public Reference
Room.

                                                 1062th--Meeting
                                  [Open Meeting; December 19, 2019; 10:00 a.m.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Item No.                     Docket No.                                   Company
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 ADMINISTRATIVE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-1......................  AD20-1-000......................  Agency Administrative Matters.
A-2......................  AD20-2-000......................  Customer Matters, Reliability, Security and Market
                                                              Operations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    ELECTRIC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E-1......................  EL16-49-000, EL18-178-000,        Calpine Corporation, Dynegy Inc., Eastern
                            (Consolidated).                   Generation, LLC, Homer City Generation, L.P., NRG
                                                              Power Marketing LLC, GenOn Energy Management, LLC,
                                                              Carroll County Energy LLC, C.P. Crane LLC,
                                                              Essential Power, LLC, Essential Power OPP, LLC,
                                                              Essential Power Rock Springs, LLC, Lakewood
                                                              Cogeneration, L.P., GDF SUEZ Energy Marketing NA,
                                                              Inc., Oregon Clean Energy, LLC and Panda Power
                                                              Generation Infrastructure Fund, LLC v. PJM
                                                              Interconnection, L.L.C.
E-2......................  OMITTED.........................
E-3......................  OMITTED.........................
E-4......................  OMITTED.........................
E-5......................  ER19-1959-000...................  Avista Corporation.
E-6......................  ER19-1507-004...................  Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Duke Energy Progress,
                                                              LLC,
                                                             and Duke Energy Florida, LLC.
E-7......................  ER19-1823-001, ER19-1960-000....  Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
E-8......................  ER19-1948-000, ER19-1948-001....  PacifiCorp.
E-9......................  ER19-1958-000...................  PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
E-10.....................  ER19-1955-000, ER19-1955-001....  Public Service Company of New Mexico.
E-11.....................  ER19-1864-001...................  Public Service Company of Colorado.
E-12.....................  ER19-1957-000, ER19-1957-001....  Alabama Power Company.
E-13.....................  ER19-467-000, ER19-467-001, ER19- New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
                            467-002.
E-14.....................  RM01-8-012......................  Revised Public Utility Filing Requirements for
                                                              Electric Quarterly Reports.
E-15.....................  AC19-75-000.....................  Duke Energy Corporation.
E-16.....................  EC19-100-000....................  Tucson Electric Power Company.
E-17.....................  ER20-227-000....................  PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., Jersey Central Power &
                                                              Light Company.
E-18.....................  EL15-68-003, EL15-68-004........  Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
                           EL15-36-003, EL15-36-004........  Otter Tail Power Company v. Midcontinent
                                                              Independent System Operator, Inc.
                           ER16-696-004, ER16-696-005, ER18- Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
                            2513-000.
E-19.....................  ER19-2488-000...................  GridLiance Heartland LLC, GridLiance High Plains
                                                              LLC, and GridLiance West LLC.
E-20.....................  ER20-153-000....................  Exelon Corporation.
E-21.....................  ER13-535-005....................  PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

E-22.....................  EL19-11-001.....................  American Wind Energy Association and The Wind
                                                              Coalition v. Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
                           ER19-2522-000, ER19-2523-000....  Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
E-23.....................  ER17-905-002....................  New York Independent System Operator, Inc. PJM
                                                              Interconnection, L.L.C.
E-24.....................  EL19-39-001.....................  Light Power & Gas of NY LLC v. New York Independent
                                                              System Operator, Inc.
E-25.....................  EL18-189-000....................  Independent Power Producers of New York, Inc. v.
                                                              New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
E-26.....................  EL19-27-000.....................  Independent Market Monitor for PJM Interconnection,
                                                              L.L.C. v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
E-27.....................  EL05-121-013, ER18-2102-000,      PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
                            ER18-2102-001.
E-28.....................  EL15-95-005.....................  Delaware Public Service Commission and Maryland
                                                              Public Service Commission v. PJM Interconnection,
                                                              L.L.C. and Certain Transmission Owners Designated
                                                              under CTOA RS FERC No. 42.
                           ER19-1501-000...................  PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and PECO Energy
                                                              Company.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       GAS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G-1......................  RP19-1598-000...................  Castex Offshore, Inc., EnVen Energy Ventures, LLC,
                                                              Fieldwood Energy LLC, M21K, LLC, and W&T Offshore,
                                                              Inc. v. Stingray Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
G-2......................  RP20-216-000, RP20-216-001......  Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
G-3......................  RP16-618-000, RP16-618-001......  Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      HYDRO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H-1......................  P-2829-005, P-2829-010..........  City of Loveland, Colorado.
H-2......................  P-12569-018.....................  Public Utility District No. 1 of Okanogan County,
                                                              Washington.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  CERTIFICATES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C-1......................  CP19-191-000....................  Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
C-2......................  CP19-31-000.....................  Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc.
C-3......................  CP18-548-000....................  Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company.
C-4......................  CP19-26-000.....................  Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc.
C-5......................  CP18-46-000, CP18-46-001........  Adelphia Gateway, LLC.
C-6......................  CP19-7-000......................  Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued: December 12, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.

    A free webcast of this event is available through http://ferc.capitolconnection.org/. Anyone with internet access who desires to
view this event can do so by navigating to www.ferc.gov's Calendar of
Events and locating this event in the Calendar. The event will contain
a link to its webcast. The Capitol Connection provides technical
support for the free webcasts. It also offers access to this event via
television in the DC area and via phone bridge for a fee. If you have
any questions, visit http://ferc.capitolconnection.org/ or contact
Shirley Al-Jarani at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Immediately following the conclusion of the Commission Meeting, a
press briefing will be held in the Commission Meeting Room. Members of
the public may view this briefing in the designated overflow room. This
statement is intended to notify the public that the press briefings
that follow Commission meetings may now be viewed remotely at
Commission headquarters, but will not be telecast through the Capitol
Connection service.

[FR Doc. 2019-27324 Filed 12-13-19; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P