[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 8251]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3384]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-973-000]

Verus Energy Trading, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Verus Energy Trading, LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is February 28, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 8, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-3384 Filed 2-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 236 (Monday, December 9, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67187-67189]
[FR Doc No: 2019-26472]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2019-0486]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Ohio River, Brookport, IL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on a
portion of the Ohio River in Brookport, IL. This action is necessary to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential
hazards created by the demolition of Lock and Dam 52 involving
explosives. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley
or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from December 9,
2019 through December 1, 2020. For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from December 3, 2019 through December 9, 2019

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-

0486 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email MST2, Dylan Caikowski, MSU Paducah, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> ext. 2120, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The purpose of this rule is to ensure the safety of vessels on the
navigable waters of the Ohio River during the demolition of Lock and
Dam 52. During this time, a temporary safety zone on the Ohio River
would be necessary to protect persons, property, and infrastructure
from potential damage and safety hazards associated with the demolition
of Lock and Dam 52. In response, on July 8, 2019, the Coast Guard
published an interim final rule titled Safety Zone; Ohio River,
Brookport, IL (84 FR 34299). There we stated why we issued the interim
final rule, and invited comments on our regulatory action related to
the demolition of the Lock and Dam 52 on the Ohio River. During the
comment period that ended August 19, 2019, we received no comments.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Sector Ohio
Valley (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with
demolition of Lock and Dam 52 involving explosives will be a safety
concern for anyone on the Ohio River from mile marker (MM) 937 to MM
941. This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment in the navigable waters within the safety zone during the
demolition of Lock and Dam 52 involving explosives.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary safety zone that covers all
navigable waters of the Ohio River from MM 937 to MM 941. This rule
will be enforced every day at midday from December 3, 2019 through
December 1, 2020 as necessary to facilitate safe demolition of Lock and
Dam 52. A Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs) will be issued six hours
prior to the start of blasting to notify the public that the safety
zone is being enforced. Vessels will be able to transit the safety zone
when explosives are not being detonated. This safety zone is intended
to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these
navigable waters during the detonation of explosives for the
demolition. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative during demolition operations involving explosives. The
text of the rule remains unchanged, but the effective period is
extended to facilitate safe demolition through the anticipated
completion of the operations.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. This safety
zone will only be enforced between MM 937 to MM 941 for a short period
of time each day and will only impact a small portion of the Ohio
River. Additionally, this safety zone will only be enforced in daytime
hours during the demolition operations of the Lock and Dam 52.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.

    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a temporary safety zone for the
demolition of Lock and Dam 52 involving explosives on the Ohio River in
Brookport, IL. It is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) in Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementing Procedures 5090.1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0486 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T08-0486  Safety Zone; Ohio River, Brookport, IL.

    (a) Location. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters of
the Ohio River from mile marker (MM) 937 to MM 941.
    (b) Effective period. This section is effective without actual
notice from December 9, 2019 through December 1, 2020. For the purposes
of enforcement, actual notice will be used from December 3, 2019
through December 9, 2019
    (c) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced at midday
each day from December 3, 2019 through December 1, 2020, as necessary
to facilitate safe demolition operations.
    (d) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23, entry of vessels or persons into the zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Ohio
Valley (COTP) or designated representative. A designated representative
is a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard
assigned to units under the operational control of USCG Sector Ohio
Valley.
    (2) Vessels requiring entry into the safety zone must request
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. To seek entry
into the safety zone, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or on VHF-FM channel 16.
    (3) Persons and vessels permitted to enter the safety zone must
transit at their slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful
directions issued by the COTP or the designated representative.
    (e) Information broadcasts. The COTP or a designated representative
will inform the public when the safety zone is being enforced via a
Broadcast Notices to Mariners.

    Dated: December 3, 2019.
A.M. Beach,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2019-26472 Filed 12-6-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 59524]
[FR Doc No: 2020-20883]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-10014-92-OA]

Notification of a Public Meeting of the Chartered Science
Advisory Board

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Science Advisory
Board (SAB) Staff Office announces a public meeting of the Chartered
SAB. The Chartered SAB will meet to conduct quality reviews of two
draft SAB reports: (1) SAB Peer Review of EPA's Revised Guidelines for
Preparing Economic Analyses, and (2) Review of EPA's Reduced Form Tools
Evaluation.

DATES: The public meeting of the Chartered Science Advisory Board will
be held on Thursday, November 12, 2020, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. (Eastern
Time).

ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be conducted remotely via webcast
and telephone. Please refer to the SAB website at http://www.epa.gov/sab for information on how to access the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any member of the public who wants
further information concerning the public meeting may contact Dr.
Thomas Armitage, Designated Federal Officer (DFO), U.S. EPA Science
Advisory Board, via telephone/voice mail<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>General information concerning the SAB can be
found on the EPA website at http://www.epa.gov/sab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The SAB was established pursuant
to the Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration
Authorization Act (ERDDAA), codified at 42 U.S.C. 4365, to provide
independent scientific and technical advice to the Administrator on the
scientific and technical basis for agency positions and regulations.
The SAB is a Federal Advisory Committee chartered under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C., App. 2. The SAB will comply
with the provisions of FACA and all appropriate SAB Staff Office
procedural policies. Pursuant to FACA and EPA policy, notice is hereby
given that the Chartered SAB will hold a public meeting to discuss and
deliberate on the topics below.
    The Chartered SAB will conduct a quality review of the SAB Economic
Guidelines Review Panel report titled SAB Peer Review of EPA's Revised
Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses. Background information
about this activity is available on the SAB website at: https://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/0/30D5E59E8DC91C2285258403006EEE00?OpenDocument. The SAB will also
conduct a quality review of the SAB Reduced- Form Tools Review Panel
report titled Review of EPA's Reduced Form Tools Evaluation. Background
information about this activity is available on the SAB website at:
https://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf//0/46C3F741097CD634852585500048F4BA?OpenDocument. The SAB quality review
process ensures that all draft reports developed by SAB panels,
committees or workgroups are reviewed and approved by the Chartered SAB
before being finalized and transmitted to the EPA Administrator. These
reviews are conducted in a public meeting as required by FACA.
    Technical Contacts: Any technical questions concerning EPA's
document titled Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses should be
directed to Dr. Al McGartland<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and Dr.
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Simon. Any technical questions concerning EPA's
document titled Evaluating Reduced-Form Tools for Estimating Air
Quality Benefits should be directed to Dr. Erika Sasser
(sasser.erika@epa.gov).
    Availability of Meeting Materials: Prior to the meeting, an agenda
and other meeting materials will be placed on the SAB website at http://epa.gov/sab.
    Procedures for Providing Public Input: Public comment for
consideration by EPA's federal advisory committees and panels has a
different purpose from public comment provided to EPA program offices.
Therefore, the process for submitting comments to a federal advisory
committee is different from the process used to submit comments to an
EPA program office.
    Federal advisory committees and panels, including scientific
advisory committees, provide independent advice to the EPA. Members of
the public can submit relevant comments pertaining to the committee's
charge or meeting materials. Input from the public to the SAB will have
the most impact if it provides specific scientific or technical
information or analysis for the SAB to consider or if it relates to the
clarity or accuracy of the technical information. Members of the public
wishing to provide comment should contact the DFO directly.
    Oral Statements: In general, individuals or groups requesting an
oral presentation at a public teleconference will be limited to three
minutes. Persons interested in providing oral statements should contact
Dr. Thomas Armitage, DFO, in writing via email) at the contact
information noted above by November 5, 2020, to be placed on the list
of registered speakers.
    Written Statements: Written statements will be accepted throughout
the advisory process; however, for timely consideration by SAB members,
statements should be received in the SAB Staff Office by November 5,
2020, with original signature. Submitters are requested to provide a
signed and unsigned version of each document because the SAB Staff
Office does not publish documents with signatures on its websites.
Members of the public should be aware that their personal contact
information, if included in any written comments, may be posted to the
SAB website. Copyrighted material will not be posted without explicit
permission of the copyright holder.
    Accessibility: For information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities, please contact Dr. Armitage at the phone
number or email address noted above, preferably at least ten days prior
to the meeting, to give the EPA as much time as possible to process
your request.

V. Khanna Johnston,
Deputy Director, EPA Science Advisory Board Staff Office.
[FR Doc. 2020-20883 Filed 9-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 144 (Friday, July 28, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35131-35133]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15865]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0295; Airspace Docket No. 16-AWP-2]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace and Amendment of Class
D and E Airspace; Kaunakakai, HI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes changes to airspace designations at
Molokai Airport, Kaunakakai, HI. The FAA proposes to establish an area
of Class E airspace designated as a surface area; modify Class E
airspace designated as an extension to a Class D or E surface area; and
modify Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface. Also, this action would update the airport's geographic
coordinates for the associated Class D and E airspace areas to reflect
the FAA's current aeronautical database and remove references to the
Molokai VHF Omnidirectional Range/Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC).
These proposed changes would enhance safety and support Instrument
Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 11, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone: 1
(800) 647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2017-0295; Airspace Docket No. 16-AWP-2, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order 7400.11A, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11A at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Clark, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is

promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to
ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority as it would establish
Class E airspace and amend Class D and Class E airspace at Molokai
Airport, Kaunakakai, HI, in support of IFR operations at the airport.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (Docket No. FAA-
2017-0295; Airspace Docket No. 16-AWP-2) and be submitted in triplicate
to DOT Docket Operations (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone
number).
    Persons wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on
this notice must submit with those comments a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket
No. FAA-2017-0295/Airspace Docket No. 16-AWP-2.'' The postcard will be
date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of
the comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed
in the docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined between 8:00 a.m. and
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays, at the
Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal Aviation
Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service Center,
Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057.

Availability and Summary of Documents Proposed for Incorporation by
Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11A, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2016, and effective
September 15, 2016. FAA Order 7400.11A is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11A lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by establishing Class E airspace
designated as surface area at Molokai Airport, Kaunakakai, HI. This new
airspace designation, within a 4.3 mile radius of the airport, would
provide controlled airspace to support increased aircraft operations
under IFR during the hours that the Class D airspace area is not in
effect.
    This proposal also would amend Class E airspace designated as an
extension to Class D or E surface area at the airport by increasing the
area to a 4.3-mile wide segment (from 3.6 miles wide) extending to 8
miles west (from 7.2 miles west) of the airport. The part-time NOTAM
information would also be removed because Class D airspace or Class E
surface airspace would be continuous. We would also remove the Molokai
VORTAC to reflect the FAA's transition from ground-based to satellite-
based navigation aids.
    Additionally, Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface would be enlarged west of the airport from the 6.8-mile
radius of the airport to an area 10 miles wide (from 3.6 miles wide)
extending to 12.4 miles west (from 8.3 miles west).
    This proposal would also update the airport's geographic
coordinates for the associated Class D and E airspace areas to reflect
the FAA's current aeronautical database. Lastly, this action would
replace the outdated term ``Airport/Facility Directory'' with the term
``Chart Supplement'' in the Class D and E airspace legal descriptions.
These modifications are necessary for the safety and management of IFR
operations at the airport.
    Lastly, a technical amendment would be made to rename the airspace
designation for the following airspace areas: AWP HI D Molokai, HI,
would be renamed Kaunakakai, HI; AWP HI E2 Molokai, HI, would be
renamed Kaunakakai, HI; and AWP HI E5 Molokai, HI, would be renamed
Kaunakakai, HI, to remain consistent in the Order.
    Class D and Class E airspace designations are published in
paragraph 5000, 6002, 6004, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order
7400.11A, dated August 3, 2016 and effective September 15, 2016, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal

Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11A,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2016, and
effective September 15, 2016, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

AWP HI D Kaunakakai, HI [Amended]

Molokai Airport, HI
    (Lat. 21[deg]09'10'' N., long. 157[deg]05'47'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,000 feet MSL within a 4.3-mile radius of Molokai Airport. This
Class D airspace area is effective during the specific dates and
times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective
date and time will thereafter be continuously published in the Chart
Supplement.

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

AWP HI E2 Kaunakakai, HI [New]

Molokai Airport, HI
    (Lat. 21[deg]09'10'' N., long. 157[deg]05'47'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 4.3-
mile radius of Molokai Airport. This Class E airspace area is
effective during the specific dates and times established in advance
by a Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter
be continuously published in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to
a Class D or Class E Surface Area.

* * * * *

AWP HI E4 Kaunakakai, HI [Amended]

Molokai Airport, HI
    (Lat. 21[deg]09'10'' N., long. 157[deg]05'47'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 1.5 miles
north and 2.8 miles south of a 255[deg] bearing from Molokai Airport
extending from the 4.3-mile radius to 8 miles west of the airport.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AWP HI E5 Kaunakakai, HI [Amended]

Molokai Airport, HI
    (Lat. 21[deg]09'10'' N., long. 157[deg]05'47'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 6.8-
mile radius of Molokai Airport and within 5.4 miles north and 4.8
miles south of a 255[deg] bearing from Molokai Airport extending
from the 6.8-mile radius to 12.4 miles west of the airport.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on July 19, 2017.
Sam S.L. Shrimpton,
Acting Group Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2017-15865 Filed 7-27-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13969-13971]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05995]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2015-8298; Special Conditions No. 25-611-SC]

Special Conditions: JAMCO America, Inc., Boeing Model 777-300ER,
Dynamic Test Requirements for Single-Occupant Oblique (Side-Facing)
Seats With Inflatable Restraints

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final special condition; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Boeing Model 777-
300ER airplane. This airplane, as modified by JAMCO America, Inc.
(JAMCO), will have a novel or unusual design feature associated with
side-facing, oblique seats equipped with inflatable restraints. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for occupants of seats installed at an
angle of greater than 18 degrees, but substantially less than 90
degrees, to the centerline of the airplane, nor for airbag devices.
These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that
the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.

DATES: This action is effective on March 16, 2016. We must receive your
comments by May 2, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2015-8298
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to http://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Shelden, Airframe and Cabin
Safety, ANM-115, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
425-227-2785; facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice of, and
opportunity for prior public comment on, these special conditions are
impracticable because these procedures would significantly delay
issuance of the design approval and thus delivery of the affected
airplane.
    The FAA therefore finds that good cause exists for making these
special conditions effective upon publication in the Federal Register.

Comments Invited

    We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
    We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We may change these special conditions based on the comments
we receive.

Background

    On April 15, 2015, through FAA project no. JAST1977-0, JAMCO
applied for a supplemental type certificate to allow the installation
of oblique passenger seats, installed at a 43-inch pitch and at an
angle of 30 degrees to the vertical plane of the

airplane longitudinal centerline, and to include inflatable lap belts,
in Boeing Model 777-300ER airplanes. The Boeing Model 777-300ER
airplane is a wide-body, swept-wing, conventional-tail, twin-engine,
turbofan-powered transport airplane, with seating capacity for 550
passengers.
    JAMCO proposes the installation of oblique (side-facing) B/E
Aerospace Super Diamond business-class seats. These seats will include
airbag devices for occupant restraint and injury protection.

Type Certification Basis

    Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101, JAMCO America, Inc., must
show that the Model 777-300ER airplane, as changed, continues to meet
the applicable provisions of the regulations incorporated by reference
in type certificate no. T00001SE or the applicable regulations in
effect on the date of application for the change. The regulations
listed in the type certificate are commonly referred to as the
``original type certification basis.'' The regulations listed in type
certificate no. T00001SE are as follows:
    Sections 25.562 and 25.785; and special conditions no. 25-295-SC
for single-occupant, side-facing seats.
    In addition, the certification basis includes certain special
conditions, exemptions, or later amended sections of the applicable
part that are not relevant to these special conditions.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Boeing Model 777-300ER airplane
because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of Sec.  21.16.
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the applicant apply for a supplemental type
certificate to modify any other model included on the same type
certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature,
these special conditions would also apply to the other model under
Sec.  21.101.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Boeing Model 777-300ER airplane must comply with the
fuel-vent and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the
noise-certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
    The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec.  11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec.  21.101.

Novel or Unusual Design Features

    The Boeing Model 777-300ER airplane, as modified by JAMCO will
incorporate the following novel or unusual design features:
    Installation of B/E Aerospace Super Diamond business-class seats
manufactured by B/E Aerospace, to be installed at an angle of 30
degrees to the airplane centerline. These seats will include airbag
devices for occupant restraint and injury protection. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for occupants of seats installed in the proposed
configuration.
    The seating configuration JAMCO proposes is novel and unusual due
to the seat installation at 30 degrees to the airplane centerline, the
airbag-system installation, and the seat/occupant interface with the
surrounding furniture that introduces occupant alignment and loading
concerns.
    Ongoing research is progressing to establish acceptable occupant-
injury limits. Until those limits become available, the FAA proposes a
set of interim limits based on the current literature available,
current National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
regulations, and preliminary test data from the research program.
    The existing regulations do not provide adequate or appropriate
safety standards for occupants of oblique-angled seats with airbag
systems. To provide a level of safety that is equivalent to that
afforded occupants of forward- and aft-facing seats, additional
airworthiness standards, in the form of special conditions, are
necessary. These special conditions supplement part 25 and, more
specifically, supplement Sec. Sec.  25.562 and 25.785. The requirements
contained in these special conditions consist of both test conditions
and injury pass/fail criteria.

Discussion

    Amendment 25-15 to part 25, dated October 24, 1967, introduced the
subject of side-facing seats and a requirement that each occupant in a
side-facing seat must be protected from head injury by a safety belt
and a cushioned rest that will support the arms, shoulders, head, and
spine.
    Subsequently, Amendment 25-20, dated April 23, 1969, clarified the
definition of side-facing seats to require that each occupant of a seat
that is positioned at more than an 18-degree angle to the vertical
plane containing the airplane centerline must be protected from head
injury by a safety belt and an energy-absorbing rest that supports the
arms, shoulders, head, and spine; or by a safety belt and shoulder
harness that prevents the head from contacting injurious objects. The
FAA concluded that a maximum 18-degree angle would provide an adequate
level of safety based on tests that were performed at the time, and
thus adopted that standard.
    Amendment 25-64, dated June 16, 1988, revised the emergency-landing
conditions that must be considered in the design of the airplane. It
revised the static-load conditions in Sec.  25.561 and added a new
Sec.  25.562, requiring dynamic testing for all seats approved for
occupancy during takeoff and landing. The intent was to provide an
improved level of safety for occupants on transport-category airplanes.
Because most seating on transport-category airplanes is forward-facing,
the pass/fail criteria developed in Amendment 25-64 focused primarily
on forward-facing seats. Therefore, the testing specified in the rule
did not provide a complete measure of occupant injury in seats that are
not forward-facing; although Sec.  25.785 does require occupants of all
seats that are occupied during taxi, takeoff, and landing not suffer
serious injury as a result of the inertia forces specified in
Sec. Sec.  25.561 and 25.562.
    To address recent research findings and accommodate commercial
demand, the FAA developed a methodology to address all fully side-
facing seats (i.e., seats oriented in the airplane with the occupant
facing 90 degrees to the direction of airplane travel) and has
documented those requirements in a set of proposed new special
conditions. The FAA issued policy statement PS-ANM-25-03-R1 on November
12, 2012, titled, ``Technical Criteria for Approving Side-Facing
Seats,'' which conveys the injury criteria to be used in the special
conditions. Some of those criteria are applicable to oblique seats but
others are not because the motion of an occupant in an oblique seat is
different from the motion of an occupant in a fully side-facing seat
during emergency landing conditions.
    For shallower installation angles, the FAA has granted equivalent
level of safety (ELOS) findings for oblique seat installations on the
premise that an occupant's kinematics in an oblique seat during a
forward impact would result in the body aligning with the impact
direction. We predicted that the occupant response would be similar to
an occupant of a forward-facing seat, and would produce a level of
safety equivalent to that of a forward-facing seat. These ELOS findings
were subject to many conditions that reflected the injury-evaluation
criteria and mitigation strategies available at the time of

issuance of the ELOS. However, review of dynamic test results for many
of these oblique seat installations raised concerns that the premise
was not correct. Potential injury mechanisms exist that are unique to
oblique seats and are not mitigated by the ELOS self-alignment approach
even if the occupant appears to respond similarly to a forward-facing
seat.
    These special conditions contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of
safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness
standards.

Applicability

    As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Boeing Model 777-300ER airplane. These special conditions can be
applied to oblique seats installed at an angle greater than 18 degrees
but less than 46 degrees to the vertical plane containing the airplane
centerline.
    Should JAMCO apply at a later date for a supplemental type
certificate to modify any other model included on type certificate no.
T00001SE to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature, these
special conditions would apply to that model as well.

Conclusion

    This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model series of airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability and affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for
approval of these features on the airplane.
    The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been
derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is
unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change
from the substance contained herein. Therefore, because a delay would
significantly affect the certification of the airplane, which is
imminent, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and comment
are unnecessary and impracticable, and good cause exists for adopting
these special conditions upon publication in the Federal Register. The
FAA is requesting comments to allow interested persons to submit views
that may not have been submitted in response to the prior opportunities
for comment described above.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.

The Special Conditions

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for the Boeing Model 777-300ER airplane as
modified by JAMCO.
    In addition to the requirements of Sec.  25.562:

1. Head-Injury Criteria

    Compliance with Sec.  25.562(c)(5) is required, except that, if the
anthropomorphic test device (ATD) has no apparent contact with the
seat/structure but has contact with an airbag, a head-injury criterion
(HIC) unlimited score in excess of 1000 is acceptable, provided the
HIC15 score (calculated in accordance with 49 CFR 571.208) for that
contact is less than 700.

2. Body-to-Wall/Furnishing Contact

    If a seat is installed aft of structure (e.g., an interior wall or
furnishing) that does not provide a homogenous contact surface for the
expected range of occupants and yaw angles, then additional analysis
and/or test(s) may be required to demonstrate that the injury criteria
are met for the area that an occupant could contact. For example, if
different yaw angles could result in different airbag performance, then
additional analysis or separate test(s) may be necessary to evaluate
performance.

3. Neck Injury Criteria

    The seating system must protect the occupant from experiencing
serious neck injury. The assessment of neck injury must be conducted
with the airbag device activated, unless there is reason to also
consider that the neck-injury potential would be higher for impacts
below the airbag-device deployment threshold.
    a. The Nij (calculated in accordance with 49 CFR
571.208) must be below 1.0, where Nij = Fz/
Fzc + My/Myc, and Nij
critical values are:

i. Fzc = 1530 lb for tension
ii. Fzc = 1385 lb for compression
iii. Myc = 229 lb-ft in flexion
iv. Myc = 100 lb-ft in extension

    b. In addition, peak upper-neck Fz must be below 937 lb
of tension and 899 lb of compression.
    c. Rotation of the head about its vertical axis, relative to the
torso, is limited to 105 degrees in either direction from forward-
facing.
    d. The neck must not impact any surface that would produce
concentrated loading on the neck.

4. Spine and Torso Injury Criteria

    a. The shoulders must remain aligned with the hips throughout the
impact sequence, or support for the upper torso must be provided to
prevent forward or lateral flailing beyond 45 degrees from the vertical
during significant spinal loading. Alternatively, the lumbar spine
tension (Fz) cannot exceed 1200 lb.
    b. Significant concentrated loading on the occupant's spine, in the
area between the pelvis and shoulders during impact, including rebound,
is not acceptable. During this type of contact, the interval for any
rearward (X-direction) acceleration exceeding 20g must be less than 3
milliseconds as measured by the thoracic instrumentation specified in
49 CFR part 572, subpart E, filtered in accordance with SAE
International (SAE) J211-1.
    c. Occupant must not interact with the armrest or other seat
components in any manner significantly different than would be expected
for a forward-facing seat installation.
    5. Longitudinal test(s), conducted to measure the injury criteria
above, must be performed with the FAA Hybrid III ATD, as described in
SAE 1999-01-1609. The test(s) must be conducted with an undeformed
floor, at the most-critical yaw case(s) for injury, and with all
lateral structural supports (armrests/walls) installed.

    Note: JAMCO must demonstrate that the installation of seats via
plinths or pallets meets all applicable requirements. Compliance
with the guidance contained in FAA Policy Memorandum PS-ANM-100-
2000-00123, dated February 2, 2000, titled, ``Guidance for
Demonstrating Compliance with Seat Dynamic Testing for Plinths and
Pallets,'' is acceptable to the FAA.

Inflatable Lap Belt Special Conditions

    If inflatable lap belts are installed on single-place side-facing
seats, the lap belts must meet Special Conditions no. 25-187A-SC.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 10, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-05995 Filed 3-15-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70524-70525]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28012]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CD15-2-000]

Consolidated Irrigation Company; Notice of Preliminary
Determination of a Qualifying Conduit Hydropower Facility and
Soliciting Comments and Motions To Intervene

    On November 12, 2014, the Consolidated Irrigation Company filed a
notice of intent to construct a qualifying conduit hydropower facility,
pursuant to section 30 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), as amended by
section 4 of the Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 (HREA).
The proposed Glendale Conduit Hydro Project would have an installed
capacity of 450 kilowatts (kW) and would be located on the existing 36-
inch-diameter Combined Conduit, which joins the Cub River conduit and
Mink Creek conduits. These conduits are used to transport water for
irrigation. The project would be located near the city of Preston in
Franklin County, Idaho.
    Applicant Contact: Lyla Dettmer, 98 East 880 North Suite #5,
Preston, ID 83263, Phone No.<PHONE_NUMBER>, ext 101.
    FERC Contact: Robert Bell, Phone No.<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Qualifying Conduit Hydropower Facility Description: The proposed
project would consist of: (1) One proposed 52.5-foot-long, 36-inch-
diameter pipe; (2) a proposed 36- by 32-foot powerhouse containing a
turbine generator unit with an installed capacity 450 kW; (3) the
proposed tailrace structure which distributes the water into the
irrigation system; and (4) appurtenant facilities. The proposed

project would have an estimated annual generating capacity of 2,631
megawatt-hours.
    A qualifying conduit hydropower facility is one that is determined
or deemed to meet all of the criteria shown in the table below.

      Table 1--Criteria for Qualifying Conduit Hydropower Facility
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Satisfies (Y/
       Statutory provision               Description             N)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FPA 30(a)(3)(A), as amended by    The conduit the facility            Y
 HREA.                             uses is a tunnel,
                                   canal, pipeline,
                                   aqueduct, flume, ditch,
                                   or similar manmade
                                   water conveyance that
                                   is operated for the
                                   distribution of water
                                   for agricultural,
                                   municipal, or
                                   industrial consumption
                                   and not primarily for
                                   the generation of
                                   electricity.
FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(i), as amended    The facility is                     Y
 by HREA.                          constructed, operated,
                                   or maintained for the
                                   generation of electric
                                   power and uses for such
                                   generation only the
                                   hydroelectric potential
                                   of a non-federally
                                   owned conduit.
FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(ii), as amended   The facility has an                 Y
 by HREA.                          installed capacity that
                                   does not exceed 5
                                   megawatts.
FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(iii), as amended  On or before August 9,              Y
 by HREA.                          2013, the facility is
                                   not licensed, or
                                   exempted from the
                                   licensing requirements
                                   of Part I of the FPA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Preliminary Determination: Based upon the above criteria,
Commission staff preliminarily determines that the proposal satisfies
the requirements for a qualifying conduit hydropower facility, which is
not required to be licensed or exempted from licensing.
    Comments and Motions to Intervene: Deadline for filing comments
contesting whether the facility meets the qualifying criteria is 45
days from the issuance date of this notice.
    Deadline for filing motions to intervene is 30 days from the
issuance date of this notice.
    Anyone may submit comments or a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR
385.210 and 385.214. Any motions to intervene must be received on or
before the specified deadline date for the particular proceeding.
    Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: All filings must (1)
bear in all capital letters the ``COMMENTS CONTESTING QUALIFICATION FOR
A CONDUIT HYDROPOWER FACILITY'' or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE,'' as
applicable; (2) state in the heading the name of the applicant and the
project number of the application to which the filing responds; (3)
state the name, address, and telephone number of the person filing; and
(4) otherwise comply with the requirements of sections 385.2001 through
385.2005 of the Commission's regulations.\1\ All comments contesting
Commission staff's preliminary determination that the facility meets
the qualifying criteria must set forth their evidentiary basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 385.2001-2005 (2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
motions to intervene and comments using the Commission's eFiling system
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration,
using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the
end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or
(202) 502-8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper
copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. A copy of all other filings in
reference to this application must be accompanied by proof of service
on all persons listed in the service list prepared by the Commission in
this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.
    Locations of Notice of Intent: Copies of the notice of intent can
be obtained directly from the applicant or such copies can be viewed
and reproduced at the Commission in its Public Reference Room, Room 2A,
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. The filing may also be
viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number (e.g., CD15-2-000) in
the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call
toll-free 1-866-208-3676 or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 19, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28012 Filed 11-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: February 4, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 22)]
[Notices]
[Page 6027]
[DOCID:fr04fe09-34]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EL08-80-003]

American Electric Power Service Corporation; Notice of Filing

January 28, 2009.
    Take notice that on January 26, 2009, American Electric Power
Service Corporation, on behalf of AEP East and AEP West Companies filed
a refund report, pursuant to the Commission's November 26, 2008 Order,
Corporation Commission of the State of Oklahoma v. American Electric
Power Company, 125 FERC ] 61,237 (2008) (the November 26 Order) and the
Notice of Extension of Time issued December 18, 2008.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 17, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-2285 Filed 2-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


application sites on the current VBC Esbiol® 90 Insecticide labels for
Esbiothrin and Esbiol.  Provided the labels are revised to remove these
use sites, a livestock metabolism study will not be required.

860.1480 Meat, Milk, Poultry, and Eggs

The requirement of a meat, milk, poultry and eggs study is reserved
until the livestock nature of the residue study has been received and
reviewed.

860.1520 Processed Food and Feed

Pilot processing studies are required demonstrating the
concentration/reduction of residue

levels in/on the raw agricultural commodities potato tubers and wheat.
Food handling establishment treatments can potentially be applied at
multiple stages of processing.  If there is not significant reduction of
total allethrin residues in/on food commodities, residue levels may
exceed the recommended 1 ppm tolerance for FHE uses.  The petitioner is
required to submit processing data for potato flakes only for potato
tubers, and all wheat processed commodities which includes wheat bran,
flour, middlings, shorts and germ.  Additional processing studies may be
required if residue levels are not reduced by 50% or more in the
processed fractions of potato tubers and wheat.

860.1550 Proposed Tolerances

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1

The petitioner is required to submit a revised Section F to specify a
tolerance level of

1.0 ppm for total allethrin residues including d-trans chrysanthemic
acid of d-allethrolone, d- trans chrysanthemic acid of l-allethrolone,
d-cis chrysanthemic acid of d-allethrolone, and d-cis chrysanthemic acid
of l-allethrolone in/on all foods in food handling establishments.
Since the analytical method submitted is not capable of distinguishing
between allethrin isomers and reports total allethrin, the tolerance
should also be expressed as total allethrin.

860.1650 Submittal of Analytical Reference Standards

Analytical reference standards for the complete allethrin series of
pyrethroids are not currently available in the National Pesticide
Standards Repository.  Standards for Bioallethrin (004003) and Pynamin
Forte (004005) are expired, and no reference standard is available for
Esbiothrin (004007).  The reference standards should be sent to the
Analytical Chemistry Lab, which is located at Fort Meade, to the
attention of Theresa Cole or Frederic Siegelman at the following
address:

USEPA

National Pesticide Standards Repository/Analytical Chemistry Branch/OPP

	701 Mapes Road

	Fort George G. Meade, MD  20755-5350

Note:  Mail will be returned if the extended zip code is not used.

Occupational and Residential Exposure

875.1400 Inhalation Exposure Indoor

A inhalation exposure study is required for the occupational handler
fogger scenario (Mix/Load/Apply liquids with fogger) due to lack of
adequate data.

REFERENCES:  TC \l1 "References:

Allethrins: Acute and Chronic Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessments for
the Section 3 Registration Action for the Use of Esbiothrin and Esbiol
in Food Handling Establishments.  Toiya Goodlow. DP Barcode 294724.

Allethrins: Petition for the Establishment of a Tolerance for Esbiothrin
and Esbiol for Use in Food/Feed Handling Establishments.  Summary of
Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data.  Petition Number: 6H5743. DP
Barcode 324039.

Allethrins: Revised Occupational and Residential Exposure Assessment and
Recommendations for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED).
Timothy Dole.  DP Barcode D340744.

Esbiothrin: Report of the Cancer Assessment Review Committee.  Jessica
Kidwell.  TXR 0051399.  12/2/03.

EPA, 2007.  “Re: Use of the Prallethrin and/or Nigg Studies”, Email
from John Carley to Molly Clayton, March 1, 2007

Benchmark Dose Analysis of 6-Month Dose Feeding Study of Bioallethrin in
Dogs, Philip Villanueva and Kit Farwell.  DP Barcode D339909.

Appendix A:	Toxicology Assessment  TC \l1 "Appendix A:  Toxicology
Assessment

A.1	Toxicology Data Requirements TC \l2 "A.1  Toxicology Data
Requirements

The requirements (40 CFR 158.340) for food use for the allethrins are
listed below. Use of the new guideline numbers does not imply that the
new (1998) guideline protocols were used.

Test

	Technical

	Required	Satisfied

870.1100    Acute Oral Toxicity

870.1200    Acute Dermal Toxicity

870.1300    Acute Inhalation Toxicity

870.2400    Primary Eye Irritation

870.2500    Primary Dermal Irritation

870.2600    Dermal Sensitization		yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes	yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

870.3100    Oral Subchronic (rodent)

870.3150    Oral Subchronic (nonrodent)

870.3200    21-Day Dermal

870.3250    90-Day Dermal

870.3465    90-Day Inhalation		yes

yes

yes

no

yes 	yes

yes

yes

-

yes a

870.3700a  Developmental Toxicity (rodent)

870.3700b  Developmental Toxicity (nonrodent)

870.3800    Reproduction		yes

yes

yes	yes

yes

yes

870.4100a  Chronic Toxicity (rodent)

870.4100b  Chronic Toxicity (nonrodent)

870.4200a  Oncogenicity (rat)

870.4200b  Oncogenicity (mouse)

870.4300    Chronic/Oncogenicity		yes

yes

yes

yes

yes	yes b

yes

yes

yes

yes

870.5100    Mutagenicity—Gene Mutation - bacterial

870.5300    Mutagenicity—Gene Mutation - mammalian

870.5xxx    Mutagenicity—Structural Chromosomal Aberrations

870.5xxx    Mutagenicity—Other Genotoxic Effects		yes

yes

yes

yes	yes

yes

yes

yes

870.6100a  Acute Delayed Neurotox. (hen)

870.6100b  90-Day Neurotoxicity (hen)

870.6200a  Acute Neurotox. Screening Battery (rat)

870.6200b  90-Day Neuro. Screening Battery (rat)

870.6300    Developmental Neurotoxicity		no

no

no

yes

yesC	-

-

yes

yes

no

870.7485    General Metabolism

870.7600    Dermal Penetration		yes

no	yes

-

Special Studies for Ocular Effects

Acute Oral (rat)

Subchronic Oral (rat)

Six-month Oral (dog)

no

no

no

-

-

-

a Requirement for 90-day inhalation study satisfied by 28-day inhalation
study.

b Requirement for chronic toxicity study satisfied by combined
chronic/oncogenicity study

c May be satisfied with a comparative neurotoxicity study.

A.2	Toxicity Profiles TC \l2 "A.2  Toxicity Profiles

Acute Toxicity of Bioallethrin

Guideline	Study Type	MRID	Results	Tox Category

870.1100	Acute Oral	00151444	LD50 709 mg/kg (M)

1042 mg/kg (F)           	III

870.1200	Acute Dermal	41155801	LD50 > 3000 mg/kg (M&F)           	III

870.1300	Acute Inhalation	42906902	LC50 : 2.51 mg/L          	IV

870.2400	Primary Eye Irritation	41155803	Slight to moderate irritant	III

870.2500	Primary Skin Irritation	41155805	Very slight dermal irritant	IV

870.2600	Dermal Sensitization	41155807	negative	N/A

Acute Toxicity of Esbiol

Guideline	Study Type	MRID	Results	Tox Category

870.1100	Acute Oral	00151460	LD50 : 574.5 mg/kg (M)

412.9 mg/kg (F)           	II

870.1200	Acute Dermal	41155802	LD50 > 2000 mg/kg 	III

870.1300	Acute Inhalation	41670801	LC50 : 1.32 mg/L (M)

1.23 mg/L (F)          	III

870.2400	Primary Eye Irritation	41155804	Moderate ocular irritant	III

870.2500	Primary Skin Irritation	41155806	Not a dermal irritant.	IV

870.2600	Dermal Sensitization	41155808	Not a sensitizer	N/A

Acute Toxicity of Esbiothrin

Guideline	Study Type	MRID	Results	Tox Category

870.1100	Acute Oral	00151449	LD50 432 mg/kg (M)

378.0 mg/kg (F)

II

870.1200	Acute Dermal	00151451	LD50 > 2000 mg/kg	III

870.1300	Acute Inhalation	00151452	LC50 : 2.63 g/m3 - unacceptable 	III

870.2400	Primary Eye Irritation	00151454	Minimally 	IV

870.2500	Primary Skin Irritation	00151453	Slightly 	III

870.2600	Dermal Sensitization	42907001	negative	n/a

Acute Toxicity of Pynamin Forte

Guideline	Study Type	MRID	Results	Tox Category

870.1100	Acute Oral	41017101	M:  2150 mg/kg

F:  900 mg/kg	III

870.1200	Acute Dermal	41017102	M:  2660 mg/kg

F:  4390 mg/kg 	III

870.1300	Acute Inhalation	41017103	LC50 > 3.875 mg/L

	870.2400	Primary Eye Irritation	41017104	slight irritant	III

870.2500	Primary Skin Irritation	41017104	negative	IV

870.2600	Dermal Sensitization	41017105	negative	N/A

Summary of Allethrin Toxicity Database

Esbiol  (S-Bioallethrin)

>90% d- trans d-

Esbiothrin

72% d- trans d-

Bioallethrin

46% d- trans d-

Pynamin Forte  (d-allethrin)

36% d- trans d-

Acute Neurotoxicity gavage

NOAEL = 30 mkd

LOAEL = 90 mkd: FOB (hunched posture, tremors, abnormal gait, (grip
strength)  1997.  5, 30, 90 mkd

Subchronic Neurotoxicity

NOAEL = 144 mg/kg/day

LOAEL = 452 mkd:  (BW, no neurotox observed.  Unacceptable (no positive
control data) 2000.

75, 250, 2000, 6000 ppm

5, 6.5, 18, 144, 452 mkd

90-day rat

NOAEL = 18 mkd

LOAEL = 37 mkd: micro pituitary

changes (M)

149 mkd: (BW; (liver/ thyroid wt, thyroid micro changes

594 mkd:  micro liver changes.

1996.

250, 500, 2000, 8000 ppm

18,   37,   149,    594 mkd

NOAEL = 75 mkd

LOAEL = 250 mkd:   (BW gain; ( liver enzymes; (abs/rel liver wt

1972. Unacceptable (no supporting tables)

500, 1500, 5000, 10000 ppm

25,   75,    250,    500  mkd

Chronic/Cancer rat

NOAEL = 27 mkd

LOAEL = 83 mkd:   (BW (F);

( liver enzymes, liver micro.

renal tubular adenomas: HDT males

1990.

100, 500, 1500,4500 ppm

5.5,  27,   83,    259   mkd

NOAEL =  29 mkd

LOAEL = 120 mkd:   (BW (F), (liver wt (M)

Negative for tumor response

1985.

125, 500, 2000 ppm

6,     24,   102   mkd

Subchronic mouse

NOAEL =  229 mkd

LOAEL = 420 mkd:   (liver wt and alkaline phosphatase (115%)

1621 mkd, piloerection and hunched posture during weeks 3/4.

1986.   8- week study.

100, 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000 ppm

22,    229,  420,   843,   1621 mkd

NOAEL = 14 mkd

LOAEL = 43 mkd - enlarged hepatocytes

1986.  5-week study.

423 mkd: ( liver wt

1522 mkd: (BW (83%/92%(PCV (43% vs 48%), (SGPT (45 vs 31)

1986.

100, 300, 1000, 3000, 10000 ppm

14,   43,   144,   423,   1550   mkd

Cancer mouse

NOAEL = 214 mkd, HDT

No treatment-related tumors.

1990.

50, 250, 1250 ppm

8,   42,   214   mkd

NOAEL = 72 mkd, HDT

LOAEL = 350 mkd:  (rel liver wt, microscopic liver changes.  No incr in
tumors.

1989

200, 600, 3000 ppm

14,   72,   350   mkd

Developmental rats

Maternal NOAEL = 20 mkd

   LOAEL = 80 mkd:   clinical signs, mortality

Devel NOAEL = 80 mkd, HDT

   LOAEL > 80 mkd

1998.

5, 20, 80 mkd

Maternal NOAEL = 25 mkd

   LOAEL = 125 mkd: clinical signs,  mortality

Develop NOAEL = 125 mkd, HDT

   LOAEL > 125 mkd

1990.

5, 25, 125 mkd

Maternal NOAEL = 125 mkd

   LOAEL = 195 mkd (mortality)

Devel NOAEL = 195 mkd

1979.   50, 125, 195 mkd

Note:  Not a reliable study for endpoint selection.

Maternal NOAEL = 30 mkd

   LOAEL = 100 mkd:   tremors,(wt gain

Develop NOAEL = 100 mkd  HDT

1989.

10, 30, 100 mkd

Developmental rabbit

Maternal NOAEL = 50 mkd

   LOAEL = 200 mkd:   (BW gain,  tremors

Devel NOAEL = 50 mkd,

   Devel LOAEL = 200 mkd:  (ossification.

1998.   5, 50, 200 mkd

Maternal NOAEL = 100 mkd

   LOAEL = 300 mkd: mortality and clinical signs

Develop NOAEL = 300 mkd, HDT

   LOAEL > 300 mkd

1990.

30, 100, 300 mkd.

Maternal NOAEL = 100 mkd

   LOAEL = 350 mkd :   mortality, (BW gain

Developmental NOAEL = 100 mkd

   LOAEL = 350 mkd:   rib/rib-vertebral malformations

1989.   30, 100, 350 mkd

Reproduction

Parental NOAEL = 50 mkd

   LOAEL = 150 mkd: (body weight

Offspring NOAEL = 50 mkd

   LOAEL = 150 mkd: (viability, BW gain, marginal increase in delayed
developmental milestones (eye opening, auricular duct opening)

1988.

70, 200, 600, 1800 ppm

6,   17,   50,   150   mkd

hä

 hä

hä

⸀⼀㄀$摧籔

!

Þ

{

}

hä

;

U

Š

°

Ã

ß

à

ༀ킄ᄂ킄㄂$葞ː葠ː摧࣑Ô	ༀꂄㄅ$葞֠

j¸

j/

j

hÐ

y

y

찐렕ꐚ速$

y

찐렕ꐚ速$

y

찐렕ꐚ速$

y

찐렕ꐚ速$

y

찐렕ꐚ速$

y

찐렕ꐚ速$

y

y

ò

ò

ò

ò

ò

ò

ò

ò

@

kd

@

 h”

@

@

@

@

@

@

摧⡵2

␱䀀Ħ

hÐ

@

㄀$摧☿_

¹

Ã

Ì

z

°

@

@

@

@

@

$

@

q

q

q

q

q

q

q

q

␱䀀Ħ摧ỉ

萏ː萑ﴰ␱䀀&葞ː葠ﴰ摧ݪÑ

&

&

&

&

&

\

&

&

&

&

&

&

&

&

&

Ff

&

&

&

@

&

@

”ÿ@

¬

 h

”ÿ@

¬

y

 h.

y

y

y

y

y

>*

y

y

y

y

y

 hÖY

 hÖY

ô

ô

ô

ô

ô

ô

ô

ô

ô

ô

ô

ô

ô

ô

ô

 hs

hs

 hs

ytY

gdY

gdY

ytY

gdY

ytY

gdY

ytY

gdY

gdY

ytY

gdY

gdY

ytY

gdY

gdY

ytY

×

×

ༀ×

Ø

Ü

Ý

þ

ÿ

|

hq

Ã

Ä

Ö

×

ó

ô

㄀$摧ୱôༀ|

~

Â

Ã

Ä

Ö

×

ò

hq

hq

hq

摧⚪J

옍)

옍)

옍)

@

$

@

$

@

@

@

@

$

@

@

@

@

@

$

@

hnu

@

@

$

@

$

@

@

@

$

@

@

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

kdH

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

hÐ

ሀparental NOAEL =  13 mkd

  LOAEL = 130 mkd:  (BW,(liver wt, and microscopic liver changes

offspring NOAEL = 15 mkd

  LOAEL = 145 mkd:(pup wt in F2 generation

1989.

 200, 2000, 6000 ppm

13,    130,   387   mkd

Subchronic dog feeding

NOAEL = 38 mkd

LOAEL = 90 mkd: (BW, clinical signs, ( liver wt

1996.   90-day feeding study.

400, 1000, 2250 ppm

16,   38,    90      mkd

NOAEL = 20 mkd

LOAEL = 63 mkd: (liver wt, enzymes.

153 mkd:  clinical signs and death

1986.  4-week feeding study.

50, 200, 800, 3200, 6400 ppm

1,   4.5,  20,   63,    153   mkd

Chronic dog feeding

NOAEL = 70 mkd HDT

LOAEL > 70 mkd

70 mkd:    alkaline phosphatase ( 240% relative to controls, brown/
black livers, ( liver/thyroid wt.

1987.   1-year feeding study.

80, 400, 2000 ppm

3,   14,  70      mkd

NOAEL = 6 mkd

LOAEL = 36 mkd: microscopic liver changes.

162 mkd:  (liver enzymes, cardiac arrhythmias, trembling, (wt gain

1982.   6- month feeding study.

200, 1000, 5000 ppm

6,     36,    162    mkd

Chronic dog capsule

NOAEL = 6 mkd

LOAEL = 20 mkd: clinical signs 1989.

 6, 20, 60, 100 mkd (capsule)

21-day dermal rabbit

systemic NOAEL = 1000 mkd, HDT

1990.

40, 200, 1000 mkd

systemic NOAEL = 300 mkd, HDT

1990.

3, 10, 30, 300 mkd

28-day dermal rat

systemic NOAEL = 1000 mkd, highest dose tested

dermal NOAEL = 1000 mkd, highest dose tested

1998.

10, 100, 1000 mkd

28-day inhalation - rat

NOAEL = 1.3 mkd

LOAEL = 6.5 mkd based on clinical signs in females (limb tremors,
hunched posture, vocalization during handling)

1997.

0.0051,  0.025,  0.073  mg/L

1.3,        6.5,     19        mkd

Unacceptable study

Metabolism / PK

Urinary elimination ~ 25-50%; fecal elimination ~ 50-60% in different
groups.  Several metabolites identified.

Dermal Absorption

Unacceptable study, not upgradeable

NOTE:  For feeding studies,  doses in mg/kg/day are reported for males.

HDT = highest dose tested

Appendix B:	Tolerance Reassessment Summary and Table TC \l1 "Appendix
C:  Tolerance Reassessment Summary and Table

For the purposes of petition 6H5743, HED has determined that the residue
of concern is the parent compound, allethrin.  No Codex, Canadian, or
Mexican MRLs have been established for the allethrins.  Adequate residue
data for food handling establishment uses are available.

VBS proposed the establishment of a 1.0 ppm tolerance for Esbiothrin and
Esbiol use in food FHE for all foods and feeds.  A revised section F
must be submitted reflecting the recommended tolerance for total
allethrin and the correct commodity definition as specified in appendix
Table C.1.  Since the analytical method submitted is not capable of
distinguishing between allethrin isomers and reports total allethrin,
the tolerance should also be expressed as total allethrin.

Provided that the residue chemistry deficiencies outlined in this
document are fulfilled, the available data will support a 1.0 ppm
tolerance for residues of total allethrin on all foods treated in food
handling establishments.

TABLE C.1.       Tolerance Summary for Esbiol and Esbiothrin

Commodity

Established/Proposed Tolerance (ppm)

Recommended Tolerance (ppm)

Comments; Correct Commodity Definition

All food items in food handling establishments	1.0	1.0	A tolerance of
1.0 ppm is established for total allethrin residues including d-trans
chrysanthemic acid of d-allethrolone, d-trans chrysanthemic acid of
l-allethrolone, d-cis chrysanthemic acid of d-allethrolone, and d-cis
chrysanthemic acid of l-allethrolone in or on all food items in food
handling establishments.

Page   PAGE  1  of   NUMPAGES  59


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29872-29873]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12104]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2011-1103; Airspace Docket No. 11-ACE-14]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Pender, NE

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E airspace at Pender, NE.
Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new Area Navigation
(RNAV) Standard Instrument Approach Procedures at Pender Municipal
Airport. The FAA is taking this action to enhance the safety and
management of Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, July 26, 2012. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone 817-321-
7716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On January 31, 2012, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to establish Class E airspace at
Pender Municipal Airport, Pender, NE (77 FR 4712) Docket No. FAA-2011-
1103. Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received. Class E airspace designations are published in
paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9V dated August 9, 2011, and effective
September 15, 2011, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
The Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
Part 71 by establishing Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface to accommodate new standard instrument approach
procedures at

Pender Municipal Airport, Pender, NE. This action is necessary for the
safety and management of IFR operations at the airport.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes controlled airspace at Pender Municipal Airport,
Pender, NE.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9V, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15,
2011, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface.

* * * * *

ACE NE E5 Pender, NE [New]

Pender Municipal Airport, NE
    (Lat. 42[deg]06'48'' N., long. 96[deg]43'40'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.3-mile radius of Pender Municipal Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 10, 2012.
Walter L. Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2012-12104 Filed 5-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 178 (Friday, September 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 51943]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20085]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-92966; File No. 265-33]

Asset Management Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is being provided that the Securities and Exchange
Commission Asset Management Advisory Committee (``AMAC'') will hold a
public meeting on September 27, 2021, by remote means. The meeting will
begin at 9:30 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public via webcast on
the Commission's website at www.sec.gov. Persons needing special
accommodations to take part because of a disability should notify the
contact person listed below. The public is invited to submit written
statements to the Committee. The meeting will include a discussion of
matters in the asset management industry relating to: The Private
Investments Subcommittee, including its potential recommendations; and
the Evolution of Advice and the Small Advisers and Small Funds
Subcommittees, including panel discussions.

DATES: The public meeting will be held on September 27, 2021. Written
statements should be received on or before September 24, 2021.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held by remote means and webcast on
www.sec.gov. Written statements may be submitted by any of the
following methods. To help us process and review your statement more
efficiently, please use only one method. At this time, electronic
statements are preferred.

Electronic Statements

     Use the Commission's internet submission form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/other.shtml); or
     Send an email message to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please
include File Number 265-33 on the subject line; or

Paper Statements

     Send paper statements to Vanessa Countryman, Federal
Advisory Committee Management Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, and 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. 265-33. This file number
should be included on the subject line if email is used. The Commission
will post all statements on the Commission's website at (http://www.sec.gov/comments/265-33/265-33.htm).
    Statements also will be available for website viewing and printing
in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Room 1580,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. For up-to-date information on the availability
of the Public Reference Room, please refer to https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answerspublicdocshtm.html or call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    All statements received will be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christian Broadbent, Senior Special
Counsel, Neil Lombardo, Senior Special Counsel, or Jay Williamson,
Branch Chief, at<PHONE_NUMBER>, Division of Investment Management,
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-3628.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with Section 10(a) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C.-App. 1, and the regulations
thereunder, Sarah ten Siethoff, Designated Federal Officer of the
Committee, has ordered publication of this notice.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Due to scheduling challenges, earlier advance publication
was not possible.

    Dated: September 13, 2021.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-20085 Filed 9-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P