PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request US EPA/ Office of Environmental Information/ Office of Information Collection 2. OMB control number b. x None a _ __ __ 2025 3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. X New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. G Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. X Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. X Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title Cross Media Electronic Reporting and Recordkeeping Rule ( Final Rule)

8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) ICR # 2002.03 9. Keywords Electronic Reporting, Environmental Compliance Reporting 10. Abstract The final electronic reporting components of CROMERRR is designed to allow EPA to comply with the Government Paperwork Elimination Act of 1998; to provide a uniform, technology neutral framework for electronic reporting across all EPA programs; to allow EPA programs to offer electronic reporting as they become ready, CROMERRR; and to provide states with a streamlined process   together with uniform set of criteria   for approval of their electronic reporting provisions for all their EPA authorized programs.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. x Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. P State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. P Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. G Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 220,826 b. Total annual responses 220,826 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 100 % c. Total hours requested 151,963 d. Current OMB inventory 0 e. Difference 151,963 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 151,963 2. Adjustment 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs $ 4,451 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) $ 664 c. Total annualized cost requested $ 5,115 d. Current OMB inventory $ 0 e. Difference $ 5,115 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change $ 5,115 2. Adjustment 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. P Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. X Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. X Reporting 1. X On occasion 2. X Weekly 3. X Monthly 4. X Quarterly 5. X Semi annually 6. X Annually 7. X Biannually 8. Q Other ( describe)

17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes X No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Evi Huffer Phone: ( 202) 566 1697 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( I) Why the information is being collected' ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( I) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Andrew Battin, Director Collection Services Division Office of Environmental Information Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Environmental Information Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 71 (Friday, April 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 22024]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08553]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Request To Release Airport Property at the Oakley Municipal
Airport (OEL), Oakley, Kansas

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the
release of land at the Oakley Municipal Airport (OEL), Oakley, Kansas,
under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 13, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to
the FAA at the following address: Lynn D. Martin, Airports Compliance
Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Airports Division, ACE-
610C, 901 Locust Room 364, Kansas City, MO 64106.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to: Jacob Wood, City Administrator, Oakley
Municipal Airport, City of Oakley, 209 Hudson Ave., Oakley, KS 67748,
(785) 671-3136<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynn D. Martin, Airports Compliance
Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Airports Division, ACE-
610C, 901 Locust Room 364, Kansas City, MO 64106,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    The request to release property may be reviewed, by appointment, in
person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the
request to release approximately 2.5 acres of airport property at the
Oakley Municipal Airport (OEL) under the provisions of 49 U.S.C.
47107(h)(2). On October 22, 2012, the City of Oakley's City
Administrator requested from the FAA that approximately 2.5 acres of
property be released for sale to Matt Mildenberger of Mitten's, Inc.
for a restaurant. On March 5, 2013, the FAA determined that the request
to release property at Oakley Municipal Airport (OEL) submitted by the
Sponsor meets the procedural requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration and the release of the property does not and will not
impact future aviation needs at the airport. The FAA may approve the
request, in whole or in part, no sooner than thirty days after the
publication of this Notice. The following is a brief overview of the
request:
    Oakley Municipal Airport (OEL) is proposing the release of a
parcel, totaling 2.5 acres. The release of land is necessary to comply
with Federal Aviation Administration Grant Assurances that do not allow
federally acquired airport property to be used for non-aviation
purposes. The sale of the subject property will result in the land at
the Oakley Municipal Airport (OEL) being changed from aeronautical to
nonaeronautical use and release the lands from the conditions of the
AIP Grant Agreement Grant Assurances. In accordance with 49 U.S.C.
47107(c)(2)(B)(i) and (iii), the airport will receive fair market value
for the property, which will be subsequently reinvested in another
eligible airport improvement project for general aviation facilities at
the Oakley Municipal Airport. Any person may inspect, by appointment,
the request in person at the FAA office listed above under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon appointment and request, inspect
the application, notice and other documents determined by the FAA to be
related to the application in person at the Oakley Municipal Airport.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on March 26, 2013.
Jim A. Johnson
 Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-08553 Filed 4-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


                              Row tracking number
                      Citation from 06/14/2010 submittal

                      Number of the Rule and Rule Title
                      Citation from 06/20/2011 submittal

                       Number of the Rule and Rule Title

                                  Discussion
                      Action we are taking in this notice
1
74:36:01

1. Minor changes to this chapter are proposed such as grammatical changes and renumbering. All definitions previously approved on 10/11/2007 (72 FR 57864) except for "construction permit" and" commenced construction".

2
74:36:01:01
(Definitions)

3
74:36:01:01 (4) "Administrator"

Grammatical change which does not change the meaning of the definition.
Proposing approval
4
 74:36:01:01(8) "Allowable Emissions"

Updating the federal reference.
Proposing approval
5
74:36:01:01 (15)
"Clean Air Act"

Updating the federal reference
Proposing approval
6
 74:36:01:01(24) "Emission Unit" or "Unit"

Grammatical change which does not change the meaning of the definition. Also adds pollutants listed under 112(b) of the CAA. Comparable definition is under 40 CFR 51.166(a)(7).  Note that the South Dakota PSD program incorporates the federal definition at 40 CFR 52.21 by reference.
Proposing approval
7
 74:36:01:01(29) "Federally Enforceable"

Updating the federal reference.
Proposing approval
8
74:36:01:01 (31) "Fixed Capital Cost"

This definition is being deleted because it is not being used in 74:36. The State did not IBR this definition (52.21(b)(57)) (which is marked as stayed) in its PSD regulations at 74:36:09:02.
Proposing approval
9
74:36:01:01 (39)
"Municipal-type solid waste"

This definition is being deleted because it is not being used in 74:36.
Proposing approval
10
74:36:01:01 (43)
"Operating permit"

Modified to reflect the separation of the construction and operating permit programs.
Proposing approval
11
 74:36:01:01(49)
"Permit Modification"

Grammatical change which does not change the meaning of the definition.
Proposing approval
12
74:36:01:01 (50)
"Permit Revision"

Grammatical change which specifies the term permit revision applies to minor source operating permits or Part 70 operating permits.
Proposing approval
13
74:36:01:01 (65) "Title II"

This definition is being deleted because it is not being used in 74:36.
Proposing approval .
14
74:36:01:01 (66) "Title III"

This definition is being deleted because it is not being used in 74:36.
Proposing approval .
15
 74:36:01:01 (70) "Title VII"

This definition is being deleted because it is not being used in 74:36.
Proposing approval
16
74:36:01:01(71) "Title VIII"

This definition is being deleted because it is not being used in 74:36.
Proposing approval
17
74:36:01:01(72) "Title IX"

This definition is being deleted because it is not being used in 74:36.
Proposing approval
18
74:36:01:01(73) "Title X"

This definition is being deleted because it is not being used in 74:36.
Proposing approval
19
74:36:01:01(74) "Title XI"

This definition is being deleted because it is not being used in 74:36.
Proposing approval
20
74:36:01:01(75) "Unit or emission unit"

This definition is being deleted because the definition of "unit" is added to 74:36:01:01(24)
Proposing approval
21
74:36:01:01(67) "VOC", "volatile organic compounds"

The definition is being updated to reference the federal definition in 40 CFR 51.100(s). This is consistent with 40 CFR 52.21(b)(30).
Proposing approval
22
74:36:01:01(72) "Construction Permit"

This new phrase is being defined in this chapter associated with the addition of a new construction permit program. The proposed definition will define what constitutes a "construction permit". There is no federal definition of "construction permit".
Proposing approval
23
74:36:01:05
(Applicable Requirements of the Clean Air Act defined)

Updating the federal reference
Proposing approval
24
74:36:01:10
(Modification defined)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the definition. There is no comparable federal definition.
Proposing approval
25
74:36:01:20
 (Physical change in or change in the method of operation defined)

Updating the federal reference
Proposing approval
26
74:36:01:21 (Commenced construction defined)

This new phrase is being defined in this chapter associated with the addition of a new construction permit program. The proposed definition will define what constitutes "commenced construction". This definition is similar to the federal definition of "commence" in 40 CFR 52.21(b)(9), except it does not have the phrase "within a reasonable time". The State did IBR the PSD definition, 52.21(b)(9), in its PSD regulations at 74:36:09:02.
Proposing approval
27
74:36:02
 (Ambient Air Quality)

Updating  federal references throughout. This chapter was previously approved on 10/11/2007 (72 FR 57864)
Proposing approval
28
74:36:03
 (Air Quality Episodes)

Updating federal references throughout. This chapter was previously approved on 10/11/2007 (72 FR 57864)
Proposing approval
29
74:36:04
 (Operating Permits for Minor Sources)

South Dakota is proposing a new construction program in 74:36:20. Therefore, this chapter is revised to only cover the operation of the source.

30
74:36:04:02
(Minor Source Operating Permit Required)

Grammatical change. South Dakota is proposing a new construction program in 74:36:20. Therefore, this chapter needs only to cover the operation of the source. This rule was originally approved on 10/19/1998 in 63 FR 55804.
Proposing approval
31
74:36:04:02.01
(Minor Source Operating Permit Exemption)

The exemptions in 74:36:04:03 are being separated into two separate sections. 74:36:04:02.01 identifies the criteria for a source as a whole to meet before an operating permit is required.  These exemptions were approved on 8/14/2006 in 71 FR 46403.
Proposing approval
32
74:36:04:03
(Minor Source Operating Permit Exemption)

The exemptions in 74:36:04:03 are being separated into two separate sections. 74:36:04:03 identifies the emission units that are not required to be included in a minor permit.  Most of these exemptions were approved on 8/14/2006 in 71 FR 46403.

The State removed exemptions for:
1) A unit fueled by natural gas that is used exclusively for space heating;
2) Emergency electrical generators powered by petroleum products; and
3) Units fueled by waste oil.

The State decreased the scope of the exemption for units with a heat input capability of not more than 3,500,000 Btus per hour.

The State added an exemption for routine housekeeping or plant upkeep activities.  See the discussion in our proposal.
Proposing approval
33
74:36:04:03.01
(Minor Source Operating Permit Variance)

This section is superseded by the July 29, 2013 submittal which we are proposing action on in this rulemaking.
Proposing approval of deletion
34
74:36:04:04
(Standard of issuance of a Minor Source Operating Permit)

Updating the federal reference and grammatical changes which do not significantly change the meaning of the rule . This chapter was previously approved on 10/11/2007 (72 FR 57864)
Proposing approval
35
74:36:04:06
(Timely and complete application for operating permit required)

This section is being revised to separate application requirements for an operating permit. This section also adds a note at the end which references requirements for a construction permit. This rule was originally approved on 8/14/2006 in 71 FR 46403.
Proposing approval
36
74:36:04:07
(Required contents of  complete application for operating permit)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the rule. This rule was originally approved on 10/19/1998 in 63 FR 55804.
Proposing approval
37
74:36:04:08
(Applicant required to supplement or correct application)

No changes from current approved rule. This rule was originally approved on 10/19/1998 in 63 FR 55804.
No action required
38
74:36:04:09
(Permit Application  -  Completeness review)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the rule. This rule was originally approved on 04/07/2003 in 68 FR 16726.
Proposing approval
39
74:36:04:10
(Time period for department's recommendation)

Grammatical change which combines language from 74:36:04:11.
This rule was originally approved on 10/19/1998 in 63 FR 55804.
Proposing approval
40
74:36:04:11
(Department's recommendation on operating permits)

This section is being deleted since the main portion of this section is included in 74:36:04:10.

Proposing approval
41
74:36:04:12
(Public Participation in permitting process)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the rule. This rule was originally approved on 04/07/2003 in 68 FR 16726.
Proposing approval
42
74:36:04:12.01
(Public review of department's draft permit)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the rule. This rule was originally approved on 04/07/2003 in 68 FR 16726.
Proposing approval
43
74:36:04:13
(Final Permit Decision  -  Notice to interested persons)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the rule. This rule was originally approved on 04/07/2003 in 68 FR 16726.
Proposing approval
44
74:36:04:15
(Contents of operating permit)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the rule. This rule was originally approved on 10/19/1998 in 63 FR 55804 .
Proposing approval
45
74:36:04:16
(Operating permit expiration)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the rule. This rule was originally approved on 10/19/1998 in 63 FR 55804 .
Proposing approval
46
74:36:04:17
(Renewal of operating permit)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the rule. This rule was originally approved on 10/19/1998 in 63 FR 55804 .
Proposing approval
47
74:36:04:18
(Operating permit revision)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the rule. This rule was originally approved on 04/07/2003 in 68 FR 16726.
Proposing approval
48
74:36:04:20
(Procedures for administrative permit amendment)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the rule. This rule was originally approved on 04/07/2003 in 68 FR 16726.
Proposing approval
49
74:36:04:20.01
(Minor permit amendment required)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the rule. This rule was originally approved on 04/07/2003 in 68 FR 16726.
Proposing approval
50
74:36:04:20.04
(Department deadline to approve minor permit amendment)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the rule. This rule was originally approved on 04/07/2003 in 68 FR 16726.
Proposing approval
51
74:36:04:23
(Reopening operating permit for cause)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the rule. This rule was originally approved on 10/18/1998 in 63 FR 55804 .
Proposing approval
52
74:36:04:27
(Operating permit termination, revision, and revocation)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the rule. This rule was originally approved on 10/18/1998 in 63 FR 55804 .
Proposing approval
53
74:36:04:32
(General permits)

Grammatical change which does not significantly change the meaning of the rule, and changed to reflect separation of construction permit program. This rule was originally approved on 5/10/2004 in 69 FR 25839 .  See discussion of general permits in the proposal notice.
Proposing approval
54
74:36:05      (Operating Permits for Part 70 Sources)

We are not taking action on this chapter.  The title V permit program is not part of the SIP.
No action needed
55
74:36:07
(New Source Performance Standards)

We are not taking action on this chapter.  NSPS are not part of the SIP.
No action needed
56
74:36:08
(NESHAPS)

We are not taking action on this chapter.  NESHAPS are not part of the SIP.
No action needed
57
74:36:09
(Prevention of Significant Deterioration)

The proposed changes were acted on on 07/22/2011 in 76 FR 43912.
No action needed
58
74:36:10
(New Source Review)

This section is superseded by the July 29, 2013 submittal which we are proposing action on in this rulemaking.
Proposing approval
59
74:36:11
(Performance Testing)

Updating the federal reference throughout chapter 11
Proposing approval
60
74:36:12
(Control of Visible Emissions)

Updating the federal reference throughout chapter 12
Proposing approval
61
74:36:13
(Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems)

Updating the federal reference throughout chapter 13
Proposing approval
62
74:36:16
(Acid Rain Program)

We are not taking action on this chapter

63
74:36:18
(Regulations for State Facilities In The Rapid City Area)

Updates 74:36:18:10 (Visible emission limit for construction and continuous operation activities) to update test method to EPA's Method 9 in 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A (July 1, 2009).
Proposing approval
64
74:36:19
(Mercury Budget Trading Program)

The DC Circuit vacated the Clean Air Mercury Rule and the State is proposing to delete Chapter 19. This rule is already removed from the SIP.
No action needed
65
74:36:20
(Construction Permits For New Sources Or Modifications)

The new construction permit program meets the requirements of the CAA and 40 CFR 51.160 and is therefore approvable.  See discussion in the proposal notice.

Proposing approval
66

74:36:20
(Construction Permits For New Sources Or Modifications)
Adds new section 74:36:20:02.01 (Initiating construction prior to permit issuance).  We are proposing to disapprove  this rule as it is not in compliance with 40 CFR 51.160 and the CAA. We are also proposing to disapprove the phrase "unless it meet the requirements in 74:36:20:02.01" in 74:36:20:02.  See discussion in the proposal notice.
Proposing disapproval


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 22, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11325-11327]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03262]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-9575; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-168-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014-20-
09 for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. AD
2014-20-09 currently requires an inspection for missing clamps that are
required to provide positive separation between the alternating current
(AC) feeder cables and the hydraulic line of the landing gear alternate
extension, and related investigative and corrective actions if
necessary. Since we issued AD 2014-20-09, it was determined that
certain airplane serial numbers are not subject to the identified
unsafe condition. This proposed AD would remove airplanes from the AD
applicability. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 10, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact
Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard,
Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 416-375-
4539; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You may view this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9575; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assata Dessaline, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Services Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-9575;
Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-168-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On September 23, 2014, we issued AD 2014-20-09, Amendment 39-17982
(79 FR 59630, October 3, 2014) (``AD 2014-20-09''), for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. AD 2014-20-09 was
prompted by reports of missing clamps that are required to provide
positive separation between the AC feeder cables and the hydraulic line
of the landing gear alternate extension. AD 2014-20-09 requires an
inspection for missing clamps that are required to provide positive
separation between the AC feeder cables and the hydraulic line of the
landing gear alternate extension, and related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary. We issued AD 2014-20-09 to detect and
correct chafing of the AC feeder cable. A chafed and arcing AC feeder
cable could puncture the adjacent hydraulic line, which, in combination
with the use of the alternate extension system, could result in an in-
flight fire.
    Since we issued AD 2014-20-09, it was determined that certain
airplane serial numbers are in a Pre-modification MS 4M153025
configuration, which allows sufficient space between the AC feeder
cables and the landing gear alternate extension hydraulic line do not
pose an in-flight fire risk. Therefore, these airplanes are not subject
to the identified unsafe condition.
    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2013-16R1, effective July 26, 2016 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-
400 series airplanes. The MCAI states:

    During production checks, it was found that the appropriate
clamps required to provide positive separation between the AC feeder
cables and the hydraulic line of the landing gear alternate
extension were omitted. The AC feeder cable could sag and be in
direct contact with the swage fitting of the landing gear alternate
extension hydraulic line, resulting in chafing of the AC feeder
cable. The chafed and arcing AC feeder cable could puncture the
adjacent hydraulic line. In combination with the use of the
alternate extension system, this could result in an in-flight fire.
    The original issue of this [Canadian] AD was issued to mandate
the incorporation of [Bombardier] service bulletin (SB) 84-24-53 to
* * * [do a general visual inspection for the presence of correctly
installed clamps] and rectify, as necessary, for proper clamp
installation.
    Bombardier, Inc. has revised SB 84-24-53 to remove serial
numbers 4001 through 4034 from the Effectivity section, as it was
determined that these serial numbers are Pre-Mod MS 4M153025, which
allowed sufficient space between the AC feeder cables and the
landing gear alternate extension hydraulic line to not pose an in-
flight fire risk. Accordingly, revision 1 of this [Canadian] AD is
issued to revise the

Applicability section to reflect the Effectivity changes in
[Bombardier Service Bulletin] SB 84-24-53 Revision B, dated 10
September 2015.

    The related investigative action is a general visual inspection of
the AC power feeder cables and the hydraulic line for damage due to
chafing. The corrective actions include repair of chafed parts and
replacement of missing clamps. You may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-9575.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-24-53, Revision B, dated
September 10, 2015. The service information describes procedures for a
general visual inspection for installation of clamps between the AC
feeder cables and hydraulic line, and related investigative and
corrective actions. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 52 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    The actions required by AD 2014-20-09, and retained in this
proposed AD, take about 2 work-hours per product, at an average labor
rate of $85 per work-hour. Required parts cost about $170 per product.
Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the actions that are
required by AD 2014-20-09 is $17,680 per product.
    This proposed AD merely removes certain airplanes and, therefore,
adds no new actions or economic burden.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2014-20-09, Amendment 39-17982 (79 FR 59630, October 3, 2014), and
adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2016-9575; Directorate Identifier
2016-NM-168-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by April 10, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2014-20-09, Amendment 39-17982 (79 FR 59630,
October 3, 2014) (``AD 2014-20-09'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-400, -401, and -
402 airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers 4035
through 4347 inclusive.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24, Electrical
power.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of missing clamps that are
required to provide positive separation between the alternating
current (AC) feeder cables and the hydraulic line of the landing
gear alternate extension. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct chafing of the AC feeder cable. A chafed and arcing AC
feeder cable could puncture the adjacent hydraulic line, which, in
combination with the use of the alternate extension system, could
result in an in-flight fire.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Clamp Inspection, Related Investigative Actions, and
Corrective Actions, With Revised Service Information Having Reduced
Effectivity

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2014-20-09, with revised service information having reduced
Effectivity. Within 6,000 flight hours or 36 months after November
7, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2014-20-09), whichever occurs
earlier: Do a general visual inspection for correctly installed
clamps between the AC feeder cables and hydraulic line, and do all
applicable related investigative and corrective actions; in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-24-53, Revision B, dated September 10, 2015. Do
all applicable related investigative and corrective actions before
further flight. After the effective date of this AD, only Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-24-53, Revision B, dated September 10, 2015, may
be used.

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before November 7,
2014 (the effective date of AD 2014-20-09), using Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84-24-53, dated May 11, 2012; or Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84-24-53, Revision A, dated May 16, 2013.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, New York ACO, ANE-170, FAA; or Transport
Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design
Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval
must include the DAO-authorized signature.

(j) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2013-16R1, effective July
26, 2016, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-9575.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt
Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet
http://www.bombardier.com. You may view this service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 3, 2017.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-03262 Filed 2-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 2, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 190)]
[Notices]
[Page 57937]
[DOCID:fr02oc06-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-605-000]

Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.; Notice of Filing

September 26, 2006.
    Take notice that on September 22, 2006, Iroquois Gas Transmission
System; L.P. (Iroquois) filed an update to the Iroquois Deferred Asset
Surcharge Adjustment, pursuant to part 154 of the Commission's
regulations and section 12.3 of the general terms and conditions of its
FERC Gas Tariff, Iroquois herewith tenders for filing this report
relating to its Deferred Asset Surcharge. Iroquois states that because
there is no change in the Deferred Asset Surcharge, as shown in the
calculation on the attached work papers, no tariff sheet is being
submitted.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-16157 Filed 9-29-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P