[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71460-71461]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28307]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-2736.

Extension:
    Rule 12f-3, SEC File No. 270-141, OMB Control No. 3235-0249.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in Rule 12f-3 (17 CFR 240.12f-
3), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of information
to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') for extension and
approval.
    Rule 12f-3 (the ``Rule''), which was originally adopted in 1934
pursuant to Sections 12(f) and 23(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (``Act''), as modified in 1995, prescribes
the information which must be included in applications for and notices
of termination or suspension of unlisted trading privileges for a
security as contemplated in Section 12(f)(4) of the Act. An application
must provide, among other things, the name of the applicant; a brief
statement of the applicant's interest in the question of termination or
suspension of such unlisted trading privileges; the title of the
security; the name of the issuer; certain information regarding the
size of the class of security and its recent trading history; and a
statement indicating that the applicant has provided a copy of such
application to the exchange from which the suspension or termination of
unlisted trading privileges are sought, and to any other exchange on
which the security is listed or admitted to unlisted trading
privileges.
    The information required to be included in applications submitted
pursuant to Rule 12f-3, is intended to provide the Commission with
sufficient information to make the necessary findings under the Act to
terminate or suspend by order the unlisted trading privileges granted a
security on a national securities exchange. Without the Rule, the
Commission would be unable to fulfill these statutory responsibilities.
    The burden of complying with Rule 12f-3 arises when a potential
respondent, having a demonstrable bona fide interest in the question of
termination or suspension of the unlisted trading privileges of a
security, determines to seek such termination or suspension. The staff
estimates that each such application to terminate or suspend unlisted
trading privileges requires approximately one hour to complete. Thus
each potential respondent would incur on average one burden hour in
complying with the Rule.
    The Commission staff estimates that there could be as many as 18
responses annually and that each respondent's related cost of
compliance with Rule 12f-3 would be $199.00, or, the cost of one hour
of professional work of a paralegal needed to complete the application.
The total annual related reporting cost for all potential respondents,
therefore, is $3,582.00 (18 responses x $199.00/response).
    Compliance with the application requirements of Rule 12f-3 is
mandatory, though the filing of such applications is undertaken
voluntarily. Rule 12f-3 does not have a record retention requirement
per se. However, responses made pursuant to Rule 12f-3

are subject to the recordkeeping requirements of Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
of the Act. Information received in response to Rule 12f-3 shall not be
kept confidential; the information collected is public information.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information on
respondents; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: Pamela Dyson, Acting
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington DC, 20549 or send
an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: November 25, 2014.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28307 Filed 12-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


 ADVANCE \y63

	UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

	REGION III

1650 Arch Street

	Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

									March 25, 2014

Honorable Collin P. O’Mara, Secretary								 Delaware Department of
Natural Resources

  and Environmental Control

89 Kings Highway

Dover, Delaware 19901

Dear Secretary O’Mara:

On February 21, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
received a revision to the Delaware State Implementation Plan (SIP) from
the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control.
The SIP revision pertains to 7 Del. Admin Code 1103 – Ambient Air
Quality Standards, which brings Delaware’s regulatory standards up to
date with current Federal requirements.  EPA has determined that the
submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is being
reviewed to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notice.

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to
Rose Quinto, Office of Air Program Planning at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS> She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

Sincerely,

							/s/

        	Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division

cc:  Mr. Ali Mirzakhalili, DNREC

       Mr. Ronald D. Amirikian, DNREC

	Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474


[Federal Register: October 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 192)]
[Notices]
[Page 61480]
[DOCID:fr05oc10-91]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12711-004]

Cobscook Bay OCGen\TM\ Power; Notice of Preliminary Permit
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To
Intervene, and Competing Applications

September 24, 2010.
    On July 1, 2010, ORPC Maine, LLC (ORPC Maine) filed an application
for a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power
Act, proposing to study the feasibility of the Cobscook Bay OCGen\TM\
Power Project, located in the Cobscook Bay, near the City of Eastport,
Washington County, Maine. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if
issued, is to grant the permit holder priority to file a license
application during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not
authorize the permit holder to perform any land-disturbing activities
or otherwise enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the
owners' express permission.
    The proposed project would consist of: (1) 5 TidGenTM
hydrokinetic tidal devices each consisting of a bottom support frame
and a single 150-kilowatt turbine generator unit for a combined
capacity of 750 kilowatts; (2) a 4,530-foot-long submersible cable
connecting the turbine-generating units of each device to a shore
station; (3) a 100-foot-long, 13-kilovolt transmission line connecting
the shore station to an existing distribution line; and (4) appurtenant
facilities. The estimated annual generation of the Cobscook Bay OCGen
Power Project would be 1.95 to 2.48 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Christopher R. Sauer, President and CEO, Ocean
Renewable Power Company, LLC, 120 Exchange Street, Suite 508, Portland,
Maine 04101; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Michael Watts,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site (http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ferconline.asp) under the
``eFiling'' link. For a simpler method of submitting text only
comments, click on ``Quick Comment.'' For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>call toll-free at
(866) 208-3676; or, for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the
Commission strongly encourages electronic filing, documents may also be
paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an original and eight copies to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-12711) in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24933 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: September 10, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 174)]
[Notices]
[Page 46587-46588]
[DOCID:fr10se09-55]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8946-8]

National Recommended Final Water Quality Criteria for Acrolein

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability of final criteria.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 304(a) of the Clean Water Act (CWA), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the availability of
final national recommended water quality criteria for the protection of
aquatic life for acrolein. Draft national recommended water quality
criteria for acrolein were published for scientific views from the
public on December 17, 2008 at 73 FR 76644. The final criteria
published today are based on EPA's Guidelines for Deriving Numerical
National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms
and Their Uses (1985), (EPA/R-85-100). EPA's recommended section 304(a)
water quality criteria provide guidance to States and authorized Tribes
in adopting water quality standards for protecting aquatic life and
human health and provide guidance to EPA for promulgating Federal
regulations under CWA section 303(c), when such action is necessary.

ADDRESSES: Scientific views received from the public on the draft
acrolein criteria are available from the EPA Docket Center and are
identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0795. They may be accessed
online at:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for reviewing comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) Water Docket, MC 2822T; 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
     On Site: EPA Docket Center, 1301 Constitution Ave, NW.,
EPA West, Room 3334, Washington DC 20460.
    For additional information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Office of Water
Docket/EPA/DC, 1301 Constitution Ave, NW., EPA West, Room 3334,
Washington DC 20460. This Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. until
4:30 p.m., EST, Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Office of Water is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Frank Gostomski, Health and
Ecological Criteria Division (4304T), U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20460;<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. What Are Water Quality Criteria?

    Water quality criteria are scientifically derived numeric values
that protect aquatic life or human health from the deleterious effects
of pollutants in ambient water.
    Section 304(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act requires EPA to develop
and publish and, from time to time, revise, criteria for water quality
accurately reflecting the latest scientific knowledge. Water quality
criteria developed under section 304(a) are based solely on data and
scientific judgments on the relationship between pollutant
concentrations and environmental and human health effects. Section
304(a) criteria do not reflect consideration of economic impacts or the
technological feasibility of meeting the chemical concentrations in
ambient water.
    Section 304(a) criteria provide guidance to States and authorized
Tribes in adopting water quality standards that ultimately provide a
basis for controlling discharges or releases of pollutants. The
criteria also provide guidance to EPA when promulgating Federal
regulations under section 303(c) when such action is necessary. Under
the CWA and its implementing regulations, States and authorized Tribes
are to adopt water quality criteria to protect designated uses (e.g.,
public

water supply, recreational use, industrial use). EPA's recommended
water quality criteria do not substitute for the CWA or regulations,
nor are they regulations themselves. Thus, EPA's recommended criteria
do not impose legally binding requirements. States and authorized
Tribes have the discretion to adopt, where appropriate, other
scientifically defensible water quality standards that differ from
these recommendations.

II. What Are the Acrolein Criteria?

    Today, EPA is publishing final national recommended water quality
criteria (NRWQC) for protecting aquatic life for acrolein. These final
criteria are based on EPA's Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National
Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and
Their Uses (1985), (EPA/R-85-100). These Guidelines describe the
Agency's current approach for deriving national recommended water
quality criteria to protect aquatic life. Reliable sources provided
toxicity data and other information on the effects of acrolein, which
were subjected to both internal and external peer review. Scientific
views were also received from the public on the draft acrolein
criteria. The comments received did not warrant modification of the
draft criteria for acrolein. The comments and EPA responses can be
found in the docket.
    Freshwater: Freshwater aquatic organisms and their uses should not
be affected unacceptably if the acute (one-hour average) concentration
of acrolein does not exceed 3.0 [mu]g/l more than once every three
years on the average, and if the chronic (four-day average)
concentration of acrolein does not exceed 3.0 [mu]g/l more than once
every three years on the average.
    Saltwater: Saltwater criteria cannot be derived for acrolein at
this time because of a lack of acute and chronic toxicity data.

III. What Is the Relationship Between the Water Quality Criteria and
State or Tribal Water Quality Standards?

    As part of the water quality standards triennial review process
defined in Section 303(c)(1) of the CWA, the States and authorized
Tribes are responsible for maintaining and revising water quality
standards. Water quality standards consist of designated uses, water
quality criteria to protect those uses, a policy for antidegradation,
and general policies for application and implementation. Section
303(c)(1) requires States and authorized Tribes to review and modify,
if appropriate, their water quality standards at least once every three
years.
    States and authorized Tribes must adopt water quality criteria that
protect designated uses. Protective criteria are based on a sound
scientific rationale and contain sufficient parameters or constituents
to protect the designated uses.
    Consistent with 40 CFR131.21 (see: EPA Review and Approval of State
and Tribal Water Quality Standards (65 FR 24641, April 27, 2000)),
water quality criteria adopted by law or regulation by States and
authorized Tribes prior to May 30, 2000, are in effect for CWA purposes
unless superseded by Federal regulations (see, for example, the
National Toxics Rule, 40 CFR 131.36; Water Quality Standards for Idaho,
40 CFR 131.33). New or revised water quality criteria adopted into law
or regulation by States and authorized Tribes on or after May 30, 2000
are in effect for CWA purposes only after EPA approval.

IV. Where Can I Find More Information About Water Quality Criteria and
Water Quality Standards?

    For more information about water quality criteria and Water Quality
Standards refer to the following: Water Quality Standards Handbook (EPA
823-B94-005a); Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule Making (ANPRM),
(63FR36742); Water Quality Criteria and Standards Plan--Priorities for
the Future (EPA 822-R-98-003); Guidelines and Methodologies Used in the
Preparation of Health Effects Assessment Chapters of the Consent Decree
Water Criteria Documents (45FR79347); Methodology for Deriving Ambient
Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Human Health (2000), (EPA-
822-B-00-004); Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National Water Quality
Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses (EPA
822/R-85-100); National Strategy for the Development of Regional
Nutrient Criteria (EPA 822-R-98-002); and EPA Review and Approval of
State and Tribal Water Quality Standards (65 FR 24641).
    You can find these publications through EPA's National Service
Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP, previously NCEPI) or on
the Office of Science and Technology's Home-page (http://www.epa.gov/
waterscience).

    Dated: August 12, 2009.
Peter S. Silva,
Assistant Administrator for Water.
[FR Doc. E9-21820 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7399-7400]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02584]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

 [EPA-R06-OAR-2011-0938; FRL-9922-72-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Mexico;
Transportation Conformity and Conformity of General Federal Actions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the
State of New Mexico on October 28, 2011, November 1, 2013, and August
8, 2014 on behalf of the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED).
These revisions amend the State transportation conformity provisions
and remove the State general conformity provisions from the SIP as
allowed by the 2005 amendments to the Clean Air Act (Act or CAA). These
revisions also establish transportation conformity criteria and
procedures related to interagency consultation and enforceability of
certain transportation-related control measures and mitigation
measures. If finalized, upon the effective date of this final action,
the EPA federal rules will govern conformity of transportation Federal
actions and general Federal actions within the State of New Mexico.
This action is being taken in accordance with sections 110 and 176 of
the Act.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before March 12, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be
submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following
the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final
rule located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Riley,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct rule
without prior proposal because the Agency views this as
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this
action no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives relevant
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment
period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do
so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: January 28, 2015.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2015-02584 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8807-8810]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04150]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0117; Product Identifier 2017-NM-104-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2017-01-
07, which applies to all Dassault Aviation Model FAN JET FALCON
airplanes, FAN JET FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G airplanes; Model
MYSTERE-FALCON 200 airplanes; Model MYSTERE-FALCON 20-C5, 20-D5, 20-E5,
and 20-F5 airplanes; and MYSTERE-FALCON 50 airplanes. AD 2017-01-07
requires a functional test or check of the main entry door closure and
warning system, and applicable door closing inspections, adjustments,
operational tests, and corrective actions if necessary. Since we issued
AD 2017-01-07, we have determined that the required actions must be
repetitively performed to ensure continued safety. This proposed AD
would require repetitive door closing inspections, adjustments,
operational tests, and corrective actions if necessary. We are
proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 16, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Dassault
Falcon Jet Corporation, Teterboro Airport, P.O. Box 2000, South
Hackensack, NJ 07606; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet: http://www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may view this referenced service

information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0117; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received,
and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2018-0117;
Product Identifier 2017-NM-104-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed
AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We issued AD 2017-01-07, Amendment 39-18774 (82 FR 1595, January 6,
2017) (``AD 2017-01-07''), for all Dassault Aviation Model FAN JET
FALCON airplanes, FAN JET FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G airplanes;
Model MYSTERE-FALCON 200 airplanes; Model MYSTERE-FALCON 20-C5, 20-D5,
20-E5, and 20-F5 airplanes; and MYSTERE-FALCON 50 airplanes. AD 2017-
01-07 requires a functional test or check of the main entry door
closure and warning system, and applicable door closing inspections,
adjustments, operational tests, and corrective actions if necessary. AD
2017-01-07 resulted from a report that, during approach for landing,
the main entry door detached from an airplane. We issued AD 2017-01-07
to detect and correct defective crew/passenger doors. Such a condition
could result in the in-flight opening or detachment of the crew/
passenger door, which could result in loss of control of the airplane
and injury to persons on the ground.

Actions Since AD 2017-01-07 Was Issued

    Since we issued AD 2017-01-07, we have determined that repetitive
door closing inspections, adjustments, operational tests, and
corrective actions if necessary, must be repetitively performed to
ensure continued safety.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD
2017-0123, dated July 20, 2017 (referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an
unsafe condition for all Dassault Aviation Model FAN JET FALCON, FAN
JET FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G airplanes; Model MYSTERE-FALCON 200
airplanes; Model MYSTERE-FALCON 20-C5, 20-D5, 20-E5, and 20-F5
airplanes; and Model MYSTERE-FALCON 50 airplanes. The MCAI states:

    During approach for landing, at an altitude of 7,000 feet, a
MF20-D5 lost the main entry door (MED). The flight crew maintained
control of the aeroplane to land uneventfully. The results of the
preliminary technical investigations concluded that the cause of
this event could be either a broken cable, or an unlocked safety
catch, associated with one or two deficient micro switches.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to in-
flight opening and/or detachment of the MED, possibly resulting in
loss of control of the aeroplane, and/or injury to persons on the
ground.
    To address this potential unsafe condition, Dassault issued
Service Bulletin (SB) F20-789, SB F200-133 and SB MF50-531,
providing instructions for inspection/adjustment, and an operational
test of the MED closure. Consequently, EASA issued AD 2015-0007
[which corresponds to FAA AD 2017-01-07] to require a one-time
accomplishment of a functional test/check of the MED closure/warning
system. It also required [a general visual] inspection and
operational test of the MED [including the control and latching
mechanisms] and, depending on findings, accomplishment of applicable
corrective action(s).
    Since that [EASA] AD was issued, EASA determined that the
inspection and operational test of the MED must be repeated to
ensure continued safety.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2015-0007, which is superseded, and
additionally requires repetitive inspections and operational tests
of the MED.

    Corrective actions include adjusting the telescopic rod bolts on
the door until the clearance between the lower part of the door and the
fuselage is within the specified tolerances. The corrective actions for
the control and latching mechanisms include adjusting components and
replacing damaged components (including pull latches, microswitches,
pulleys, and cables). Signs of damage include cracks, corrosion, wear,
and distortion. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2018-0117.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Dassault Aviation has issued the following service information.
     Dassault Service Bulletin F20-789, also referred to as
789, dated December 9, 2014.
     Dassault Service Bulletin F50-531, also referred to as
531, dated December 9, 2014.
     Dassault Service Bulletin F200-133, also referred to as
133, dated December 9, 2014.
    This service information describes procedures for inspections,
adjustments, and operational tests of certain doors and corrective
actions. These documents are distinct since they apply to different
airplane models. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these
same type designs.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 392 airplanes of U.S.
registry.

    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
              Action                    Labor cost        Parts cost      Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections/adjustments/           4 work-hours x $85               $0  $340...............  $133,280.
 operational tests (retained        per hour = $340.
 actions from AD
 2017[dash]01[dash]07).
Inspections/adjustments/           4 work-hours x $85                0  $340 per inspection  $133,280 per
 operational tests (new proposed    per hour = $340                      cycle.               inspection cycle.
 action).                           per inspection
                                    cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes to the Director of the System Oversight
Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2017-01-07, Amendment 39-18774 (82 FR 1595, January 6, 2017), and
adding the following new AD:

Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA-2018-0117; Product Identifier
2017-NM-104-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by April 16, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2017-01-07, Amendment 39-18774 (82 FR 1595,
January 6, 2017) (``AD 2017-01-07'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the airplanes specified in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (c)(4) of this AD, certificated in any category, all serial
numbers.
    (1) Dassault Aviation Model FAN JET FALCON, FAN JET FALCON
SERIES C, D, E, F, and G airplanes.
    (2) Dassault Aviation Model MYSTERE-FALCON 200 airplanes.
    (3) Dassault Aviation Model MYSTERE-FALCON 20-C5, 20-D5, 20-E5,
and 20-F5 airplanes.
    (4) Dassault Aviation Model MYSTERE-FALCON 50 airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 52, Doors.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report indicating that during approach
for landing, the main entry door detached from an airplane. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct defective crew/passenger
doors. Such a condition could result in the in-flight opening or
detachment of the crew/passenger door, which could result in loss of
control of the airplane and injury to persons on the ground.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Main Entry/Passenger/Crew Door Closing Inspections,
Adjustments, and Operational Tests and Corrective Actions, With No
Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2017-01-07, with no changes. Within 330 flight hours or 13 months,
whichever occurs first after February 10, 2017 (the effective date
of AD 2017-01-07), unless already done: Do the applicable door
closing inspections, adjustments, and operational tests, and do all
applicable corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service information identified in
paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD. Do all applicable
corrective actions before further flight.
    (1) For Model FAN JET FALCON airplanes; Model FAN JET FALCON
SERIES C, D, E, F, and G airplanes; and Model MYSTERE-FALCON 20-C5,
20-D5, 20-E5, and 20-F5 airplanes: Dassault Service Bulletin F20-
789, also referred to as 789, dated December 9, 2014.

    (2) For Model MYSTERE-FALCON 200 airplanes: Dassault Service
Bulletin F200-133, also referred to as 133, dated December 9, 2014.
    (3) For Model MYSTERE-FALCON 50 airplanes: Dassault Service
Bulletin F50-531, also referred to as 531, dated December 9, 2014.

(h) New Requirement of This AD: Repetitive Main Entry/Passenger/Crew
Door Closing Inspections, Adjustments, and Operational Tests and
Corrective Actions

    Within 72 months after accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed
72 months, repeat the actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD,
and do all applicable corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information
identified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD. Do all
applicable corrective actions before further flight.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to: [email protected].
    (i) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (ii) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2017-01-07, Amendment 39-
18774 (82 FR 1595, January 6, 2017), are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or
Dassault Aviation's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.

(j) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA AD 2017-0123, dated July 20, 2017, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2018-0117.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Dassault Falcon Jet Corporation, Teterboro Airport, P.O. Box 2000,
South Hackensack, NJ 07606; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet http://www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 20, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-04150 Filed 2-28-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: September 18, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 182)]
[Notices]
[Page 54184-54186]
[DOCID:fr18se08-89]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-58516; File No. SR-Amex-2008-69]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Related to the Listing and Trading of Options on Section 107 Securities

September 11, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 3, 2008, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'' or
``Exchange''), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. Amex filed
the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to add new Commentary .11 to Rule 915 and new
Commentary .12 to Rule 916 to enable the listing and trading of options
on securities meeting the requirements of Sections 107D, 107E, 107F,
107G, 107H or 107I of the Amex Company Guide (the ``Company Guide'').
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Amex's Web
site at http://www.amex.com, the Office of the Secretary, the Amex and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections (A), (B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of
such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to adopt new Commentary .11 to Rule 915 and
new Commentary .12 to Rule 916 to enable the listing and trading of
options on index-linked securities (``Index-Linked Securities''),
commodity-linked securities (``Commodity-Linked Securities''),
currency-linked securities (``Currency-Linked Securities''), fixed
income-linked securities (``Fixed Income-Linked Securities''), futures-
linked securities (``Futures-Linked Securities'') and combination-
linked securities (``Combination-Linked Securities'') (collectively
known as ``Section 107 Securities'' as defined in Sections 107D, 107E,
107F, 107G, 107H and 107I, respectively, of the Company Guide) that are
principally traded on a national securities exchange and an ``NMS
Stock'' (as defined in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``1934 Act'')).
    Section 107 Securities are designed for investors who desire to
participate in a specific market segment by providing

exposure to one or more identifiable underlying securities,
commodities, currencies, derivative instruments or market indexes of
the foregoing (``Underlying Index'' or ``underlying Indexes''). Section
107 Securities are the non-convertible debt of an issuer that have a
term of at least one (1) year but not greater than thirty (30) years.
Despite the fact that Section 107 Securities are linked to an
underlying index, each trades as a single, exchange-listed security.
Accordingly, rules pertaining to the listing and trading of standard
equity options will apply to Section 107 Securities. The Exchange does
not propose any changes to rules pertaining to Stock Index Options.
Listing Criteria
    The Exchange will consider listing and trading options on Section
107 Securities provided the Section 107 Securities meet the criteria
for underlying securities set forth in Commentary .01 to Rule 915. The
Exchange proposes that Section 107 Securities deemed appropriate for
options trading represent ownership of a security that provides for the
payment at maturity, as described below.
     Index-Linked Securities are securities that provide for
the payment at maturity of a cash amount based on the performance of an
underlying index or indexes of equity securities (``Equity Reference
Asset'').
     Commodity-Linked Securities are securities that provide
for the payment at maturity of a cash amount based on the performance
of one or more physical commodities or commodity futures, options or
other commodity derivatives or Commodity-Based Trust Shares or a basket
or index of any of the foregoing (``Commodity Reference Asset'').
     Currency-Linked Securities are securities that provide for
the payment at maturity of a cash amount based on the performance of
one or more currencies, or options or currency futures or other
currency derivatives or Currency Trust Shares \5\ or a basket or index
of any of the foregoing (``Currency Reference Asset'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Amex Rule 1200B-AEMI(b). The term ``Currency Trust
Shares'' means a security that (i) is issued by a trust that holds a
specified non-U.S. currency deposited with the trust; (ii) when
aggregated in some specified minimum number may be surrendered to
the trust by the beneficial owner to receive the specified non-U.S.
currency; and (iii) pays beneficial owners interest and other
distributions on the deposited non-U.S. currency, if any, declared
and paid by the trust.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Fixed Income-Linked Securities are securities that provide
for the payment at maturity of a cash amount based on the performance
of one or more notes, bonds, debentures or evidence of indebtedness
that include, but are not limited to, U.S. Department of the Treasury
securities (``Treasury Securities''), government-sponsored entity
securities (``GSE Securities''), municipal securities, trust preferred
securities, supranational debt and debt of a foreign country or a
subdivision thereof or a basket or index of any of the foregoing
(``Fixed Income Reference Asset'');
     Futures-Linked Securities are securities that provide for
the payment at maturity of a cash amount based on the performance of an
index of (a) futures on Treasury Securities, GSE Securities,
supranational debt and debt of a foreign country or a subdivision
thereof, or options or other derivatives on any of the foregoing; or
(b) interest rate futures or options or derivatives on the foregoing in
this subparagraph (b) (``Futures Reference Asset''); and
     Combination-Linked Securities are securities that provide
for the payment at maturity of a cash amount based on the performance
of any combination of two or more Equity Reference Assets, Commodity
Reference Assets, Currency Reference Assets, Fixed Income Reference
Assets or Futures Reference Assets (``Combination Reference Asset'').
    For the purposes of Commentary .11 to Rule 915, Equity Reference
Assets, Commodity Reference Assets, Currency Reference Assets, Fixed
Income Reference Assets, Futures Reference Assets and Combination
Reference Assets, will be collectively referred to as ``Reference
Assets,'' as defined in Sections 107D, 107E, 107F, 107G, 107H and 107I,
respectively, of the Company Guide. Section 107 Securities must meet
the criteria and guidelines for underlying securities set forth in
Commentary .01 to Rule 915, or the Section 107 Securities must be
redeemable at the option of the holder at least on a weekly basis
through the issuer at a price related to the applicable underlying
Reference Asset. In addition, the issuing company is obligated to issue
or repurchase the securities in aggregation units for cash or cash
equivalents satisfactory to the issuer of Section 107 Securities which
underlie the option as described in the Section 107 Securities
prospectus.
Continued Listing Requirements
    Options on Section 107 Securities will be subject to all Exchange
rules governing the trading of equity options. The current continuing
or maintenance listing standards for options traded on the Amex will
continue to apply.
    The Exchange proposes to establish Commentary .12 to Rule 916 which
will include criteria related to the continued listing of options on
Section 107 Securities.
    Under the applicable continued listing criteria in proposed
Commentary .12 to Rule 916, options on Section 107 Securities initially
approved for trading pursuant to proposed Commentary .11 to Rule 915
may be subject to the suspension of opening transactions as follows:
(1) Non-compliance with the terms of proposed Commentary .11 to Rule
915; (2) non-compliance with the terms of Commentary .01 to Rule 916,
except that in the case of options covering Section 107 Securities
approved pursuant to proposed Commentary .11(c)(2) to Rule 915 that are
redeemable at the option of the holder at least on a weekly basis, then
option contracts of the class covering such Securities may only
continue to be open for trading as long as the Securities are listed on
a national securities exchange and are an ``NMS stock'' as defined in
Rule 600 of Regulation NMS; (3) in the case of any Section 107 Security
trading pursuant to Commentary .11 to Rule 915, the value of the
Reference Asset is no longer calculated or available; or (4) such other
event shall occur or condition exist that in the opinion of the
Exchange makes further dealing in such options on the Exchange
inadvisable.
    The Exchange represents that the listing and trading of options on
Section 107 Securities pursuant to proposed Commentary .11 to Rule 915
will not have any effect on the rules pertaining to position and
exercise limits \6\ or margin.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Amex Rules 904 and 905.
    \7\ See Amex Rules 462.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange will implement surveillance procedures for options on
Section 107 Securities, including adequate comprehensive surveillance
sharing agreements with markets trading in non-U.S. components, as
applicable. The Amex represents that these procedures will be adequate
to properly monitor Exchange trading of options on these securities and
to deter and detect violations of Exchange rules.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with Section
6 of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5),\9\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with

persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The Exchange submits that the instant proposal to
adopt generic initial and continued listing criteria for options on
Section 107 Securities will serve to provide enhanced risk management
tools for investors that, to date, have been absent in connection with
Section 107 Securities. In addition, the Exchange further believes that
the proposed listing criteria together with the Exchange's surveillance
procedures will serve to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited nor received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change: (1) Does not
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition;
and (3) by its terms does not become operative for 30 days after the
date of this filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to provide the Commission
with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has fulfilled this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does
not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing. However,
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) permits the Commission to designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest. The Exchange requests that the Commission waive
the 30-day operative delay so that the Exchange is able to compete with
other options exchanges that are currently permitted to list and trade
options on Section 107 Securities. The Commission believes that waiving
the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest.\12\ The Commission notes the
proposal is substantively identical to proposals that were recently
approved by the Commission, and does not raise any new regulatory
issues.\13\ For these reasons, the Commission designates the proposed
rule change as operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
    \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 58203 (July 22,
2008), 73 FR 43812 (July 28, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2008-57) and 58204
(July 22, 2008), 73 FR 43807 (July 28, 2008) (SR-CBOE-2008-64).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Amex-2008-69 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2008-69. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2008-69 and should be
submitted on or before October 9, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-21761 Filed 9-17-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: July 9, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 130)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 32803-32804]
[DOCID:fr09jy09-5]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 91

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0937; Amendment No. 91-308]
RIN 2120-AJ37

Drug and Alcohol Testing Program; Technical Amendment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is making minor
technical changes to a final rule published in the Federal Register on
May 14, 2009. That final rule amended the FAA's drug and alcohol
regulations to place them in a new part. In that final rule the FAA
inadvertently did not include an instruction to amend a cross-reference
to two appendices.

DATES: Effective Dates:
    Effective on July 13, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rafael Ramos, Office of Aerospace
Medicine, Drug Abatement Division, AAM-800, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
published a document in the Federal Register May 14, 2009, in 74 FR
22649 that amended the regulations governing FAA-required drug and
alcohol testing requirements. The FAA inadvertently did not include an
instruction to revise language in Sec.  91.146 to change the reference
to the drug and alcohol testing program regulation title from the old
(14 CFR part 121, appendices I and J) to new, 14 CFR part 120. This
amendment will not impose any additional restrictions on operators
affected by these regulations.

Technical Amendment

    The technical amendment will further amend part 91 by updating a
cross-reference in Sec.  91.146(b).

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 91

    Aircraft, Airmen, Aviation safety.

0
Accordingly, Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 91
is amended as follows:

PART 91--GENERAL OPERATING AND FLIGHT RULES

0
1. The authority citation for part 91 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 1155, 40103, 40113, 40120, 44101,
44111, 44701, 44704, 44709, 44711, 44712, 44715, 44716, 44717,
44722, 46306, 46315, 46316, 46504, 46506-46507, 47122, 47508, 47528-
47531, articles 12 and 29 of the Convention on International Civil
Aviation (61 Stat. 1180).

0
2. Section 91.146(b) introductory text is revised to read as follows:

Sec.  91.146  Passenger-carrying flights for the benefit of a
charitable, nonprofit, or community event.

* * * * *
    (b) Passenger carrying flights for the benefit of a charitable,
nonprofit, or community event identified in paragraph (c) of this
section are not subject to the certification requirements of part 119
or the drug and alcohol testing requirements in part 120 of this
chapter, provided the following conditions are satisfied and the
limitations in paragraphs (c) and (d) are not exceeded:
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 2, 2009.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E9-16059 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 92 (Tuesday, May 12, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27996-27997]
[FR Doc No: 2020-10119]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2105-089; 2105-126]

Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Petition for
Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on April 24, 2020, Pacific Gas and Electric
Company (PG&E), applicant for relicensing the Upper North Fork Feather
River Hydroelectric Project No. 2105, filed a petition for declaratory
order (petition) pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2) of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR
385.207(a)(2). PG&E requests that the Commission declare that the
California State Water Resources Control Board has waived its authority
to issue a certification for the Upper North Fork Feather River Project
under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1), as more
fully explained in the petition.
    Any person wishing to comment on PG&E's petition may do so.\1\ The
deadline for filing comments is 30 days from the issuance of this
notice. The Commission encourages electronic submission of comments in
lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons
unable to file electronically should send comments to the following
address: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852. Be sure to reference the
project docket numbers (P-2105-089 and -126) with your submission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ PG&E's request is part of its relicensing proceeding in
Project No. 2105-089. Thus, any person that intervened in the
relicensing proceeding is already a party. The filing of the
petition in this case does not trigger a new opportunity to
intervene.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number excluding the

last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. At
this time, the Commission has suspended access to Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,
(202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on June 5, 2020.

    Dated: May 6, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-10119 Filed 5-11-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P