[Federal Register: August 8, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 152)]
[Notices]
[Page 44516-44518]
[DOCID:fr08au07-63]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0435; FRL-8133-7]

Ethyl Parathion; Proposal Not to Initiate the Special Review and
Tributyltin Antifoulants; Proposal to Terminate Special Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the Agency's intention not to initiate a
Special Review of Ethyl Parathion and its proposal to terminate the
Special Review of Tributyltin (TBT) used in antifouling paints. The
Agency is proposing these actions because all pesticide registrations
of ethyl parathion and all TBT antifouling paints are canceled.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 7, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0435, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2007-0435. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The Federal regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available in regulations.gov. To access the electronic docket, go to
http://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced Search,'' then ``Docket

Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where indicated and select the
``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on the regulations.gov web
site to view the docket index or access available documents. Although
listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either in the
electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available

in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard P. Dumas, Special Review and
Reregistration Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide
users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution,
or use of pesticides. Since others also may be interested, the Agency
has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be
affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date, and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Background

A. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    1. Ethyl Parathion: On May 16, 1986, as required by 40 CFR 154.21,
EPA provided the registrants a preliminary notification that EPA was
considering initiating a Special Review of Ethyl Parathion. The basis
for the concern was acute toxicity to humans from oral and dermal
exposure and to birds from dietary and dermal exposures. In 1991, to
address the human health concerns, the registrants voluntarily canceled
many uses of ethyl parathion and imposed several mitigation measures
for the remaining nine uses.
    In 2002, all products being manufactured for sale in the U.S. were
voluntarily canceled. However, four ethyl parathion product
registrations held by Drexel Chemical Company that had not been
manufactured for several years were not included in the 2002
cancellation actions. On March 16, 2005, Drexel Chemical Company
requested voluntary cancellation for the four registrations. The
cancellation of the four remaining ethyl parathion product
registrations was effective on December 13, 2006.
    Under 40 CFR 154.23, the Administrator must provide his rationale
for not initiating a Special Review and provide an opportunity for
comment. Because there are no remaining product registrations, and thus
the risk concerns have been mitigated, EPA is proposing not to initiate
a Special Review for Ethyl Parathion. The public will have until
September 7, 2007 to comment on this proposal. Once comments are
reviewed, EPA will issue a notice in the Federal Register with its
final determination as to whether or not to initiate a Special Review
for Ethyl Parathion.
    2. Tribuyltin Antifoulants: The Special Review of Tribuyltin
Antifoulants was initiated on January 8, 1986. Studies indicated
toxicity to non-target marine and fresh water organisms at low levels,
in some cases, at the parts per trillion level. On October 4, 1988, EPA
partially concluded the Special Review for Tributyltin Antifoulants (53
FR 390222-41). The Special Review was concluded except for the issue of
the release rates of TBT from antifoulant paints into the environment.
Since that time, all antifouling paint products containing TBT have
been voluntarily canceled. The last cancellation was effective on
December 1, 2005. Under 40 CFR 154.31, the Administrator must provide
his rationale for terminating a Special Review and provide an
opportunity for comment. Because there are no remaining pesticide
registrations for the antifouling paint use, EPA is proposing to
terminate the Special Review of Tributytin Anitfoulants. The public
will have until September 7, 2007 to comment on this proposal. Once
comments are reviewed, EPA will issue a notice in the Federal Register
with its final determination as to whether or not to terminate the
Special Review of Tributytin Antifoulants.

B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

    A pesticide product may be sold or distributed in the United States
only if it is registered or exempt from registration under the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) as amended (7 U.S.C.
136 et seq.). Before a product can be registered it must be shown that
it can be used without causing ``unreasonable adverse effects on the
environment,'' FIFRA section 3(c)(5). The term ``unreasonable adverse
effects on the environment'' is defined in FIFRA section 2(bb) as ``any
unreasonable risk to man or the environment, taking into account the
economic, social, and environmental costs and benefits of the use of
any pesticide.'' The burden of proving that a pesticide meets this
standard for registration is, at all times, on the proponent of initial
or continued registration. If at any time the Agency determines that a
pesticide no longer meets this standard, the Administrator may cancel
this registration under section 6 of FIFRA.
    The Special Review process provides a mechanism to permit public
participation in EPA's deliberations prior to issuance of any Notice of
Final Determination describing the regulatory action which the
Administrator has selected. The Special Review process, which was
previously called the Rebuttable Presumption Against Registration
(RPAR) process, is described in 40 CFR part 154, published in the
Federal Register of November 25, 1985 (50 FR 49015). The purpose of
this process is to determine whether some or all registrations of a
particular active ingredient or ingredients meet the FIFRA standard for
registration, or whether amendment of the terms and conditions of
registration or cancellation of portions or all of the registrations is
appropriate.
    Prior to formal initiation of a Special Review, a preliminary
notification is sent to registrants and applicants for registration
pursuant to 40 CFR part 154.21 announcing that the Agency is
considering commencing a Special Review. Registrants and applicants for
registration are allowed 30 days from receipt of the notification to
comment on the Agency's proposal to commence a Special Review.
    If the Agency determines, after issuance of a notification pursuant
to 40 CFR 154.21, that it will not conduct a Special Review, it is
required under 40 CFR 154.23(b) to issue a proposed decision to be
published in the Federal Register. The portion of this Notice
concerning ethyl parathion is being issued pursuant to 40 CFR
154.23(b). That regulation requires that a period of not less than 30
days be provided for public comment on the Proposed Decision Not to
Initiate a Special Review. Subsequent to receipt and evaluation of
comments on the Proposed Decision Not to Initiate a Special Review,
pursuant to 40 CFR 154.25 the Administrator must publish in the Federal
Register his final decision regarding whether or not to initiate a
Special Review.
    If the Agency determines, after issuance of a notification pursuant
to 40 CFR 154.21, that it will initiate a Special Review, 40 CFR
154.23(c) requires the Administrator to publish a Notice of Special
Review in the Federal Register. To conclude the Special Review after a
Special Review has been initiated, 40 CFR 154.31 requires the
Administrator to first publish a Notice of Preliminary Determination in
the Federal Register. The portion of this Notice concerning the
Tributylin Antifoulants is being issued pursuant to 40 CFR 154.31. That
regulation requires the Administrator to respond to all significant
comments received on the Notice of Special Review and, among other
things, make a preliminary determination of whether any of the
applicable risk criteria have been satisfied. Finally, after receipt
and evaluation of comments on the Notice of Preliminary Determination,
40 CFR 154.33 requires that the Administrator

publish in the Federal Register a Notice of Final Determination,
including the reasons for the determination.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides, Pests.

    Dated: July 30, 2007.
James B. Gulliford,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances.
[FR Doc. E7-15110 Filed 8-7-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 163 (Friday, August 21, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51648-51650]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17482]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2020-0415]
RIN 1625-AA00

Emergency Safety Zone; Lower Mississippi River, Rosedale, MS

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
emergency purposes for all waters of the Lower Mississippi River (LMR),
extending from River Mile Marker (MM) 592.0 to MM 595.0. The emergency
safety zone is needed to protect persons, property, infrastructure, and
the marine environment from the potential safety hazards associated
with the salvage and diving effort of two sunken barges at MM 593.5, in
the vicinity of the Victoria Bend Revetment, Rosedale, Mississippi.
Deviation from the safety zone is prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port Lower Mississippi River or a
designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from August 21,
2020 through August 31, 2020, or until all salvage and diving work is
complete, whichever occurs earlier. For purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from August 3, 2020 through August 21, 2020.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2020-0415 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LT Adam J. Paz, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
LMR Lower Mississippi River
MM River Mile Marker
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because salvage efforts for two sunken barges
mid-river will impede the safe navigation of vessel traffic, and
immediate action is needed to protect persons and property. Completing
the full NPRM process is impracticable because we must establish this
safety zone by August 3, 2020.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest
because immediate action is needed to respond to the potential safety
hazards associated with salvage operations in the vicinity of Victoria
Bend Revetment.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port (COTP) Lower
Mississippi River (LMR) has determined that potential hazards
associated with the salvage of two sunken barges will be a safety
concern for anyone within a one and one-half mile radius of the salvage
and diving vessels and machinery. This rule is needed to protect
persons, property, infrastructure, and the marine environment in all
waters of the LMR within the safety zone while the salvage and diving
work is being conducted.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary emergency safety zone from August
3, 2020 through August 31, 2020, or until all salvage and diving work
is complete, whichever occurs earlier. The safety zone will cover all
waters of the LMR from MM 592.0 to MM 595.0, extending the entire width
of the river. The safety

zone will only be activated during daylight hours when salvage work
precludes safe navigation of the established channel. The duration of
the zone is intended to protect persons, property, infrastructure, and
the marine environment in these navigable waters while salvage and
diving work is being conducted. No vessel or person will be permitted
to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or
a designated representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the safety zone. This emergency safety zone
will temporarily restrict navigation during daylight hours on the LMR
from MM 592.0 to MM 595.0 in the vicinity of Rosedale, Mississippi,
from August 3, 2020 through August 31, 2020, or until all salvage and
diving work is complete, whichever occurs earlier. The Coast Guard will
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16
informing the public of the times that the zone will be activated, and
the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone on a
case-by-case basis.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
temporary emergency safety zone on the LMR from MM 592.0 to MM 595.0,
that will prohibit entry into this zone unless permission has been
granted by the COTP Lower Mississippi or a designated representative.
The safety zone will only be enforced for short durations during
daylight hours while salvage and diving work precludes the safe
navigation of the established channel. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph L60(d) of Appendix A, Table 1 of
DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS.

0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0415 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T08-0415  Emergency Safety Zone; Lower Mississippi River,
Rosedale, MS.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Mississippi River from MM 592.0 to MM 595.0.
    (b) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by telephone or email. Those in the safety zone must
comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP
or the COTP's designated representative.
    (c) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced as needed
during daylight hours from August 3, 2020 through August 31, 2020, or
until all salvage and diving work is complete, whichever occurs
earlier. Periods of activation will be promulgated by Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.

    Dated: July 30, 2020.
R.S. Rhodes,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Lower Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2020-17482 Filed 8-20-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 197 (Thursday, October 11, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51366-51369]
[FR Doc No: 2018-21653]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2018-0507; FRL-9984-97-Region 3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) Ozone Season Emissions Caps for Non-
Trading Large NOX Units and Associated Revisions to General
Administrative Provisions and Kraft Pulp Mill Regulation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a state
implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Maryland.
The revision (Maryland SIP Revision #18-03) pertains to a new Maryland
regulation that establishes ozone season nitrogen oxides
(NOX) emissions caps and other requirements for large non-
electric generating units (non-EGU) in Maryland and includes associated
revisions to two other Maryland regulations. The revision will enable
Maryland to meet NOX reduction requirements related to
interstate transport of pollution that contributes to other states'
nonattainment or interferes with other states' maintenance of the ozone
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). EPA is approving these
revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).

DATES: This final rule is effective on November 13, 2018.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2018-0507. All documents in the docket are listed on
the http://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through
http://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn Powers,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On August 8, 2018 (83 FR 39014), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) for the State of Maryland. In the NPRM, EPA proposed
approval of new Code of Maryland Regulation (COMAR) 26.11.40--NOX Ozone
Season Emission Caps for Non-Trading Large NOX Units and revisions to
two regulations presently included in the Maryland SIP, COMAR
<IP_ADDRESS>--General Administrative Provisions and COMAR 26.11.14--
Control of Emissions from Kraft Pulp Mills. The formal SIP revision was
submitted by Maryland on May 15, 2018. The SIP revision was submitted
to address Maryland's requirements under the NOX SIP Call.
(63 FR 57356, October 27, 1998.)
    The NOX SIP Call, issued pursuant to Section 110 of the
CAA and codified at 40 CFR 51.121 and 51.122, was designed to mitigate
significant transport of NOX, one of the precursors of
ozone.\1\ EPA developed the NOX Budget Trading Program, an
EPA-administered allowance trading program that states could adopt to
meet their obligations under the NOX SIP Call. The
NOX Budget Trading Program allowed electric generating units
(EGUs) greater than 25 megawatts and industrial non-electric generating
units, such as boilers and turbines, with a rated heat input greater
than 250 million British thermal units per hour (MMBtu/hr), referred to
as ``large non-EGUs,'' to participate in a regional NOX cap
and trade program. Maryland complied with the NOX SIP call
by participation of its large EGUs and large non-EGUs in the
NOX Budget Trading Program. EPA discontinued administration
of the NOX Budget Trading Program in 2009 upon the start of
the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) trading programs (70 FR 25162, May
12, 2005). The NOX SIP Call requirements continued to apply,
however, and EGUs in most states (including Maryland) that formerly
participated in the NOX Budget Trading Program continued to
meet their NOX SIP Call requirements under the generally
more stringent requirements of the CAIR NOX Ozone Season
trading program, either pursuant to CAIR Federal implementation plans
(FIP) (71 FR 25328, April 28, 2006) or pursuant to approved CAIR SIP
revisions.\2\ For the large non-EGUs, states needed to take regulatory
action to ensure that their obligations under the NOX SIP
Call continued to be met, either through an option to submit a CAIR SIP
revision that allowed the large non-EGUs to participate in the CAIR
NOX Ozone Season trading program or through adoption of
other replacement regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In October 27, 1998 (63 FR 57356), EPA finalized the
``Finding of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking for Certain
States in the Ozone Transport Assessment Group Region for Purposes
of Reducing Regional Transport of Ozone''--commonly called the
NOX SIP Call.
    \2\ EPA approved a CAIR SIP revision replacing the CAIR FIP for
Maryland on October 30, 2009 (74 FR 56118).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Maryland, Luke Paper Mill (formerly the Westvaco pulp and paper
mill) was the only facility with large non-EGUs that participated in
the NOX Budget Trading Program. When the CAIR NOX
Ozone Season trading program replaced the NOX Budget Trading
Program, Maryland adopted the CAIR program as it applied to large EGUs,
but chose not to include the non-EGUs at Luke as participants in the
CAIR NOX Ozone Season trading program.\3\ Instead, in 2010,
Maryland adopted COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>--Control of Emissions from Kraft
Pulp Mills, which, among other requirements, included provisions that
address the NOX SIP Call non-EGU requirements in Maryland
through a NOX ozone season tonnage cap of 947 tons for the
Luke non-EGUs and monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting in
accordance with 40 CFR part 75.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ EPA stopped administering the CAIR trading programs upon
implementation of the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) trading
programs. Maryland subsequently took action rescinding its CAIR
regulation (COMAR 26.11.28), and submitted a SIP revision to EPA
which sought removal of the regulation in its entirety from the
approved Maryland SIP. On July 17, 2017 (82 FR 32641), EPA approved
the SIP revision removing the CAIR regulation from Maryland's SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Subsequent to adoption of COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>, Maryland determined
that additional applicable units have either started operation or were
previously not subject but have become subject to the requirements for
non-EGUs under the NOX SIP Call as the units have heat input
ratings greater than 250 MMBtu/hr. A review of the applicability of the
NOX SIP Call to large non-EGUs in the State showed that
there are three additional facilities having non-EGUs that are covered
under the NOX SIP Call. Maryland adopted new regulation
COMAR 26.11.40 to reallocate the statewide NOX emissions cap
among the affected sources, and concurrently revised COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>
to reflect a reduced cap for Luke.

II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis

    New COMAR 26.11.40 establishes NOX ozone season tonnage
caps and

NOX monitoring requirements for large non-EGUs in the State
that are not covered under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group
2 Trading Program to meet requirements of the NOX SIP Call.
NOX emissions caps are specified for non-EGUs located at
four facilities (American Sugar Refining, Dominion Energy Cove Point
LNG, Luke Paper Mill, and National Institutes of Health). A portion of
the statewide cap is set aside for new units or modified existing units
that may become subject to the NOX SIP Call in the future.
Title 40 CFR part 75, subpart H, monitoring of NOX emissions
at affected units is required in accordance with 40 CFR 51.121(i)(4).
    COMAR 26.11.14 was revised to reflect the changed NOX
caps for Luke Paper Mill in COMAR 26.11.40. COMAR 26.11.14 was also
revised to remove the provision for paper mills to acquire
NOX allowances if the facility's ozone season NOX
cap is exceeded. With the removal of the requirement to purchase
NOX allowances, a corresponding definition in COMAR 26.11.01
for NOX allowances was also removed.
    EPA finds that this May 2018 SIP submittal meets Maryland's
NOX SIP Call requirements (including requirements in CAA
section 110 and 40 CFR 51.121) for non-EGUs through new regulation
COMAR 24.11.40, including (1) the applicability provisions in COMAR
<IP_ADDRESS>, which update the State's requirements to include all
currently applicable large non-EGUs and any new non-EGUs under the
NOX SIP Call; (2) the specified statewide ozone season
NOX emissions cap of 1,013 tons in COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>, which
is consistent with the portion of the overall Maryland NOX
emissions budget under the NOX Budget Trading Program
attributable to non-EGUs; and (3) the 40 CFR part 75 monitoring,
recordkeeping and reporting requirements in COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>, which
apply for the affected non-EGUs. In addition, the revisions remove the
ability of Kraft pulp mills that exceed their NOX limits and
caps to comply by purchasing or otherwise acquiring NOX
allowances from EPA's ozone season NOX Trading Program by
removing these provisions in COMAR 26.11.14 and 26.11.01. The removal
of the provisions allowing purchase of additional allowances removes
the potential for increased local NOX emissions. Other
specific requirements of Maryland's May 15, 2018 SIP submittal and the
rationale for EPA's proposed action are explained in the NPRM and will
not be restated here. The SIP submittal does not result in increased
NOX emissions in the State, and therefore EPA finds it has
no impact on any requirements related to attainment, reasonable further
progress, or any other NAAQS requirements under the CAA. The submittal
therefore meets section 110(l) of the CAA for SIP revisions.

III. Public Comments and EPA's Responses

    EPA received three anonymous comments on the NPRM, all of which are
in the docket for this rulemaking at www.federalregister.gov. Two of
the comments did not concern any of the specific issues raised in the
NPRM, nor did they address EPA's rationale for the proposed approval of
MDE's submittal. Therefore, EPA is not responding to those comments.
One comment was addressed as follows:
    Comment: A comment was made about a term used in EPA's completeness
determination for the Maryland SIP submittal. EPA's completeness
determination is available in the docket for this rulemaking. The
commenter states: ``The docket contains a document entitled [sic] ``MD
305 Completeness Checklist 2018-08-27-033843.'' In that document, EPA
Requirement number 8 (Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how
compliance will be determined in practice) says ``DITTO'' under the
``State Submittal'' column. What does ``DITTO'' mean here? I don't
believe this is an environmental, regulatory, or technical term. I
can't understand how you determined this submittal to be complete if
you use such terms.''
    Response: EPA used the word ``DITTO'' in EPA Requirement 8 on page
5 of the ``SIP Submittal Completeness Checklist'' (completeness
checklist) as shorthand to indicate that EPA found the State SIP
submittal is meeting the EPA requirements for item 8 with the same
COMAR regulations as that listed and shown by EPA in the completeness
checklist in response to item 7 in the ``State Submittal'' column
directly above item 8. In effect, EPA's use of the word ``DITTO'' in
the completeness checklist for item 8 means that the EPA found the
requirements for ``Compliance/Enforcement strategies, including how
compliance will be determined in practice.'' is met by the requirements
in COMAR 26.11.40 and COMAR <IP_ADDRESS> for monitoring, recordkeeping,
and reporting in accordance with 40 CFR part 75 as explained in EPA's
response to item 7 which contains those regulatory citations. According
to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, ``ditto'' means ``a thing mentioned
previously or above --used to avoid repeating a word --often symbolized
by inverted commas or apostrophe.'' Thus, EPA employed this commonly
used word ``ditto'' in the completeness checklist in response to item 8
instead of repeating our answer from item 7 as our answers were
intended to be identical to both. As this comment does not concern any
of the specific issues raised in the NPRM nor EPA's rationale for
approval of MDE's SIP submittal, EPA provides no further response.

IV. Final Action

    EPA is approving Maryland's May 15, 2018 SIP revision submittal as
a revision to the Maryland SIP in accordance with section 110 of the
CAA as the SIP meets requirements in the CAA and in 40 CFR 51.121
related to the NOX SIP Call requirements.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of new Maryland
regulation COMAR 26.11.40 and revisions to COMAR 26.11.01 and 26.11.17
to meet the requirements for non-EGUs under the NOX SIP
Call. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials
generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region
III Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in
the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are
fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of
the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will
be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP
compilation.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond

those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by December 10, 2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action approving new Maryland regulation COMAR 26.11.40
and revisions to COMAR 26.11.01 and COMAR 26.11.14 to address the
requirements of the NOX SIP Call may not be challenged later
in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.

    Dated: September 24, 2018.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

     Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart V--Maryland

0
2. In Sec.  52.1070, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by:
0
a. Revising the entries ``<IP_ADDRESS>'' and ``<IP_ADDRESS>''; and
0
 b. Adding a heading and the entries ``<IP_ADDRESS>'' through
``<IP_ADDRESS>'' in numerical order.
    The revisions and additions read as follows:

Sec.  52.1070   Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                 EPA-Approved Regulations, Technical Memoranda, and Statutes in the Maryland SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Code of Maryland                                 State                            Additional explanation/
  Administrative Regulations       Title/subject      effective     EPA approval date      citation at 40 CFR
       (COMAR) citation                                  date                                    52.1100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   26.11.01 General Administrative Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<IP_ADDRESS>..................  Definitions.........     04/23/18  10/11/18, [Insert     Section .01B is revised
                                                                   Federal Register      to remove definition 24-
                                                                   citation].            1 for ``NOX ozone
                                                                                season allowance''
                                                                                Previous approval 7/17/
                                                                                2017.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               26.11.14 Control of Emissions From Kraft Pulp Mills
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
<IP_ADDRESS>..................  Control of NOX           04/23/18  10/11/18, [Insert     Sections .07A and .07B
                                Emissions from Fuel                Federal Register      are revised, Section
                                Burning Equipment.                 citation].            .07C is removed,
                                                                                Section .07D is revised
                                                                                and recodified as
                                                                                Section .07C.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      26.11.40 NO Ozone Season Emission Caps for Non-trading Large NO Units
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<IP_ADDRESS>..................  Definitions.........     04/23/18  10/11/18, [Insert     ........................
                                                                   Federal Register
                                                                   citation].
<IP_ADDRESS>..................  Applicability.......     04/23/18  10/11/18, [Insert     ........................
                                                                   Federal Register
                                                                   citation].
<IP_ADDRESS>..................  NOX Ozone Season         04/23/18  10/11/18, [Insert     ........................
                                Emission Caps.                     Federal Register
                                                                   citation].
<IP_ADDRESS>..................  Monitoring and           04/23/18  10/11/18, [Insert     ........................
                                Reporting                          Federal Register
                                Requirements.                      citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-21653 Filed 10-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: March 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 49)]
[Notices]
[Page 12326-12328]
[DOCID:fr15mr10-102]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61671; File No. SR-CHX-2010-05]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Increase the Provide Credit for Transactions Involving Issues Priced
Less Than One Dollar

March 8, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 3, 2010, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III

below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. CHX filed the
proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon filing
with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The CHX proposes to amend its Schedule of Participant Fees and
Assessments (the ``Fee Schedule''), effective March 3, 2010, to change
its transaction fees and rebates to Exchange Participants for
transactions involving issues priced less than one dollar that occur
within the Exchange's Matching System. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange's Web site at http://www.chx.com/
rules/proposed_rules.htm, on the Commission's Web site at http://
www.sec.gov, at CHX, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the CHX included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule changes and
discussed any comments it received regarding the proposal. The text of
these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV
below. The CHX has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C
below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Through this filing, the Exchange would amend its Fee Schedule to
increase the provide credit to Exchange Participants for transactions
involving issues priced less than one dollar that occur within the
Exchange's Matching System.
    The Exchange proposes to increase the provide credit in the
transactions described above from 0.15% to 0.25% of the trade value.\5\
Due to this increased provide credit and the fact that tiered pricing
does not apply to transactions in issues priced under $1, the Exchange
proposes to exclude transactions in issues priced under $1 from the
calculation of a Participant's average daily volume (``ADV'') for
monthly tiered pricing purposes. The Exchange believes that the
increased rebate will help attract additional orders to be displayed
and executed on our trading facilities. The Exchange notes that some of
our competitors have recently raised their provide rebates for
securities priced under $1, and that our proposed increase will help us
remain competitive with these entities.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ ``Trade value'' is defined in our Fee Schedule as ``a dollar
amount equal to the price per share multiplied by the number of
shares executed.''
    \6\ The National Stock Exchange raised its provide credit to
0.25% for transactions under $1 in Tape A, B and C securities
beginning in the month of February 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \7\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \8\ in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among its members. Among other things, the change to the
fee schedule would provide incentives to Participants to increase the
amount of liquidity provided on our trading facilities for securities
priced less than $1, which may contribute to an increase in trading
volume on the Exchange and in the income derived therefrom.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(B)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \9\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder \10\ because it establishes or changes a due, fee, or other
charge applicable only to a member imposed by the self-regulatory
organization. Accordingly, the proposal is effective upon Commission
receipt of the filing. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purpose of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CHX-2010-05 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2010-05. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/
shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make

available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CHX-
2010-05 and should be submitted on or before April 5, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-5532 Filed 3-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 71601]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28545]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR14-9-000]

Shell Pipeline Company LP; Notice of Petition for Declaratory
Order

    Take notice that on November 14, 2013, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2)
of the Commission's Rules of Practices and Procedure, 18 CFR
385.207(a)(2)(2013), Shell Pipeline Company LP (SPLC) filed a petition
requesting a declaratory order approving SPLC's proposed contract rates
and proposed service priority rights and prorationing provisions for
shippers that have executed Transportation Service Agreements in
accordance with the terms of the recently concluded binding open
season, for SPLC's proposed transportation service from Nederland and
Port Neches, TX to St. James and Clovelly, LA, and any other additional
further receipt or delivery points, as explained more fully in the
petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in this proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must
serve a copy of that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on December 16, 2013.

    Dated: November 20, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-28545 Filed 11-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 76 (Friday, April 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23629-23630]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09161]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Commercial Space Transportation; Notice of Availability
and Request for Comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for
the SpaceX Texas Launch Site

AGENCY: DOT, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), lead Federal
agency; and National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National
Park Service, U.S. Army White Sands Missile Range, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, cooperating agencies.

ACTION: Notice of Availability, Notice of Public Comment Period, Notice
of Public Hearing, and Request for Comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA; 42 United States Code [U.S.C.] 4321 et seq.),
Council on Environmental Quality NEPA implementing regulations (40 Code
of Federal Regulations parts 1500 to 1508), and FAA Order 1050.1E,
Change 1, the FAA, Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) is
announcing the availability of and requesting comments on the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for the SpaceX Texas Launch Site (Draft
EIS). This Draft EIS is also submitted for review pursuant to the
following public law requirements: Section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. Section 303); Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470); Executive Order 11988,
Floodplain Management; DOT Order 5650.2, Floodplain Management and
Protection; Executive Order 11990, Protection of Wetlands; and DOT
Order 5660.1A, Preservation of the Nation's Wetlands.
    An electronic version of the Draft EIS is available on the FAA/AST
Web site: http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/environmental/nepa_docs/review/documents_progress/spacex_texas_launch_site_environmental_impact_statement/. In addition, copies of
the Draft EIS were sent to persons and agencies on the distribution
list (found in Chapter 11 of the Draft EIS). A paper copy and an
electronic version of the Draft EIS may be reviewed during regular
business hours at the following Brownsville locations:
     Brownsville Public Library Main Branch, 2600 Central Blvd.
     Southmost Branch Library, 4320 Southmost Blvd.
     University of Texas at Brownsville, Oliveira Library, 80
Fort Brown St.
    The FAA will hold a public hearing to solicit comments from the
public concerning the scope and content of the Draft EIS.
     May 7, 2013, 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., at the International
Technology, Education, and Commerce (ITEC) Center, located at 301
Mexico Boulevard, Suite G-1, Brownsville, TX 78520.
    The public hearing will include a poster information session from
5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., FAA presentation from 6:00 p.m. to 6:15 p.m.,
followed by a public statement period in which members of the public
may provide up to a 3-minute statement. The FAA will transcribe all
oral comments. All comments received during the comment period will be
given equal weight and be taken into consideration in the preparation
of the Final EIS.

DATES: The public comment period for the Draft EIS begins with the
issuance of this Notice of Availability and last 45 days. The FAA
encourages interested agencies, organizations, Native American tribes,
and members of the public to submit comments concerning the scope and
content of the Draft EIS by June 3, 2013. Comments on the Draft EIS
should be as specific as possible and address the analysis of potential
environmental impacts and the adequacy of the Proposed Action or merits
of alternatives and the mitigation being considered. Reviewers should
organize their participation so that it is meaningful and makes the
agency aware of the reviewer's interests and concerns using quotations
and other specific references to the text of the Draft EIS and related
documents. Matters that could have been raised with specificity during
the comment period on the Draft EIS may not be considered if they are
raised for the first time later in the decision process. This
commenting procedure is intended to ensure that substantive comments
and concerns are made available to the FAA in a timely manner so that
the FAA has an opportunity to address them.

ADDRESSES: Please submit comments or questions regarding the Draft EIS
to Ms. Stacey M. Zee, FAA Environmental Specialist, SpaceX EIS c/o
Cardno TEC Inc., 275 West Street, Suite 110, Annapolis, MD 21401.
Comments may also be submitted via email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by fax to<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Stacey M. Zee, Environmental
Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue
SW., Suite 325, Washington, DC 20591; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Additional Information

    The Proposed Action is for the FAA to issue launch licenses and/or
experimental permits to SpaceX that would allow SpaceX to launch the
Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy orbital vertical launch vehicles and a
variety of reusable suborbital launch vehicles from a launch site on
privately-owned property in Cameron County, Texas. As part of the
Proposed Action, SpaceX plans to construct facilities, structures, and
utility connections in order to support the launch of the Falcon 9 and
Falcon Heavy launch vehicles. The facilities would be located in two
areas:

vertical launch area and control center area. The proposed vertical
launch area site is currently undeveloped and is located directly
adjacent to the eastern terminus of Texas State Highway 4 (Boca Chica
Boulevard) and approximately 3 miles north of the Mexican border on the
Gulf Coast. It is located approximately 5 miles south of Port Isabel
and South Padre Island. At the vertical launch area, the new facilities
required would include an integration and processing hangar, a launch
pad and stand with its associated flame duct, a water tower, a
retention basic for deluge water, propellant storage and handling
areas, a workshop and office area, and a warehouse for parts storage.
    The command and control functions for a launch are required to be
conducted at a safe separation distance from the actual launch pad. The
control center area would be located inland, approximately 2 miles west
of the vertical launch area and would include control center buildings,
payload processing facilities, a launch vehicle processing hangar,
generators and diesel storage facilities, and a satellite fuels storage
facility. All facilities would be constructed through private funding,
on currently undeveloped private property that would be purchased or
leased by SpaceX. In addition, new underground power lines would be
installed in the State Highway 4 Right-of-Way from the control center
area to the vertical launch area.
    Operations would consist of up to 12 launches per year with a
maximum of two Falcon Heavy launches. All Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy
launches would be expected to have commercial payloads, including
satellites or experimental payloads. In addition to standard payloads,
the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy may also carry a capsule, such as the
SpaceX Dragon capsule. All launch trajectories would be to the east
over the Gulf of Mexico.
    Alternatives under consideration include the Proposed Action and
the No Action Alternative. Under the No Action Alternative, the FAA
would not issue a license or experimental permit to SpaceX. The Draft
EIS evaluates the direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental
impacts of the Proposed Action and No Action Alternative on several
environmental impact categories, including compatible land use
(including farmlands and coastal resources); Section 4(f) properties;
noise; visual resources and light emissions; historical, architectural,
archaeological, and cultural resources; air quality; water resources
(including wetlands, floodplains, surface waters, groundwater, and wild
and scenic rivers); biological resources (including fish, wildlife, and
plants); hazardous materials, pollution prevention, and solid waste;
socioeconomics, environmental justice, and children's environmental
health risks and safety risks; energy supply and natural resources; and
secondary (induced) impacts. Additional resources were also considered
including airspace, health and safety, and ground traffic and
transportation. The Proposed Action would include a significant
encroachment on floodplains per DOT Order 5650.2, Floodplain Management
Protection.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 11, 2013.
Daniel Murray,
Deputy Manager, Space Transportation Development Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-09161 Filed 4-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 87 (Friday, May 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24647-24650]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09629]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2021-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2133]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Federal
Regulations. The LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will be finalized on the dates
listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS report in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood

hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Chief executive officer of                                    Online location of letter of map                            Community
         State and county          Location and case No.             community               Community map repository                 revision                Date of modification       No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colorado:
    Arapahoe.....................  City of Centennial     Mr. Matt Sturgeon, Manager,     Southeast Metro Stormwater     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 30, 2021.........       080315
                                    (20-08-0573P).         City of Centennial, 13133       Authority, 7437 South          advanceSearch.
                                                           East Arapahoe Road,             Fairplay Street, Centennial,
                                                           Centennial, CO 80112.           CO 80112.
    Arapahoe.....................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Nancy Jackson,    Arapahoe County Public Works   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 30, 2021.........       080011
                                    of Arapahoe County     Chair, Arapahoe County Board    and Development Department,    advanceSearch.
                                    (20-08-0573P).         of Commissioners, 5334 South    6924 South Lima Street,
                                                           Prince Street, Littleton, CO    Centennial, CO 80112.
                                                           80120.
    Douglas......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Lora Thomas,      Douglas County Department of   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 30, 2021.........       080049
                                    of Douglas County      Chair, Douglas County Board     Public Works Engineering,      advanceSearch.
                                    (21-08-0166P).         of Commissioners, 100 3rd       100 3rd Street, Castle Rock,
                                                           Street, Castle Rock, CO         CO 80104.
                                                           80104.
Florida:
    Bay..........................  City of Lynn Haven     The Honorable Dan Russell,      Development and Planning       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 16, 2021.........       120009
                                    (20-04-2912P).         Mayor, City of Lynn Haven,      Department, 817 Ohio Avenue,   advanceSearch.
                                                           817 Ohio Avenue, Lynn Haven,    Lynn Haven, FL 32444.
                                                           FL 32444.
    Bay..........................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Robert Carroll,   Bay County Planning            https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 16, 2021.........       120004
                                    of Bay County (20-04-  Chairman, Bay County Board of   Department, 840 West 11th      advanceSearch.
                                    2912P).                Commissioners, 840 West 11th    Street, Panama City, FL
                                                           Street, Panama City, FL         32401.
                                                           32401.
    Charlotte....................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Bill Truex,       Charlotte County Building      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 20, 2021.........       120061
                                    of Charlotte County    Chairman, Charlotte County      Department, 18400 Murdock      advanceSearch.
                                    (21-04-1486P).         Board of Commissioners, 18500   Circle, Port Charlotte, FL
                                                           Murdock Circle, Port            33948.
                                                           Charlotte, FL 33948.
    Collier......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Penny Taylor,     Collier County Growth          https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 23, 2021.........       120067
                                    of Collier County      Chair, Collier County Board     Management Department, 2800    advanceSearch.
                                    (21-04-0329P).         of Commissioners, 3299          North Horseshoe Drive,
                                                           Tamiami Trail East, Suite       Naples, FL 34104.
                                                           303, Naples, FL 34112.
    Lee..........................  City of Bonita         The Honorable Rick Steinmeyer,  Community Development          https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 10, 2021.........       120680
                                    Springs (21-04-        Mayor, City of Bonita           Department, 9220 Bonita        advanceSearch.
                                    1316P).                Springs, 9101 Bonita Beach      Beach Road, Bonita Springs,
                                                           Road, Bonita Springs, FL        FL 34135.
                                                           34135.
    Monroe.......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Michelle          Monroe County Building         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 19, 2021.........       125129
                                    of Monroe County (21-  Coldiron, Mayor, Monroe         Department, 2798 Overseas      advanceSearch.
                                    04-1092P).             County Board of                 Highway, Suite 300,
                                                           Commissioners, 25 Ships Way,    Marathon, FL 33050.
                                                           Big Pine Key, FL 33042.

    Monroe.......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Michelle          Monroe County Building         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 9, 2021..........       125129
                                    of Monroe County (21-  Coldiron, Mayor, Monroe         Department, 2798 Overseas      advanceSearch.
                                    04-1580P).             County Board of                 Highway, Suite 300,
                                                           Commissioners, 25 Ships Way,    Marathon, FL 33050.
                                                           Big Pine Key, FL 33042.
    Volusia......................  City of Daytona Beach  Mr. James Chisholm, Manager,    Utilities Engineering          https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 2, 2021..........       125099
                                    (20-04-3525P).         City of Daytona Beach, 301      Division, 125 Basin Street,    advanceSearch.
                                                           South Ridgewood Avenue,         Suite 100, Daytona Beach, FL
                                                           Daytona Beach, FL 32114.        32114.
    Volusia......................  City of Port Orange    The Honorable Donald O.         Community Development          https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 13, 2021.........       120313
                                    (20-04-5567P).         Burnette, Mayor, City of Port   Department, 1000 City Center   advanceSearch.
                                                           Orange, 1000 City Center        Circle, Port Orange, FL
                                                           Circle, Port Orange, FL         32129.
                                                           32129.
    Volusia......................  Unincorporated areas   Mr. George Recktenwald,         Volusia County Planning and    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 2, 2021..........       125155
                                    of Volusia County      Volusia County Manager, 123     Development Services           advanceSearch.
                                    (20-04-3525P).         West Indiana Avenue, Deland,    Department, 123 West Indiana
                                                           FL 32720.                       Avenue, Deland, FL 32720.
    Volusia......................  Unincorporated areas   Mr. George Recktenwald,         Volusia County Planning and    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 13, 2021.........       125155
                                    of Volusia County      Volusia County Manager, 123     Development Services           advanceSearch.
                                    (20-04-5567P).         West Indiana Avenue, Deland,    Department, 123 West Indiana
                                                           FL 32720.                       Avenue, Deland, FL 32720.
Louisiana:
    St. Tammany..................  City of Mandeville     The Honorable Clay Madden,      City Hall, 3101 East Causeway  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 11, 2021.........       220202
                                    (20-06-2506P).         Mayor, City of Mandeville,      Approach, Mandeville, LA       advanceSearch.
                                                           3101 East Causeway Approach,    70448.
                                                           Mandeville, LA 70448.
    St. Tammany..................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Michael B.        St. Tammany Parish             https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 10, 2021.........       225205
                                    of St. Tammany         Cooper, President, St.          Inspections and Enforcement    advanceSearch.
                                    Parish (21-06-         Tammany Parish, 21490 Koop      Department, 21454 Koop
                                    0797P).                Drive, Mandeville, LA 70471.    Drive, Mandeville, LA 70471.
Massachusetts: Barnstable........  Town of Barnstable     Mr. Mark S. Ells, Manager,      Inspectional Services          https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 6, 2021..........       250001
                                    (20-01-1587P).         Town of Barnstable, 367 Main    Department, 200 Main Street,   advanceSearch.
                                                           Street, Hyannis, MA 02601.      Hyannis, MA 02601.
New Mexico: Taos.................  Unincorporated areas   Mr. Brent Jaramillo, Taos       Taos County Planning           https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 20, 2021.........       350078
                                    of Taos County (20-    County Manager, 105 Albright    Department, 105 Albright       advanceSearch.
                                    06-2988P).             Street, Suite G, Taos, NM       Street, Taos, NM 87571.
                                                           87571.
South Carolina: Horry............  City of North Myrtle   Mr. Michael Mahaney, Manager,   Planning and Development       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 18, 2021.........       450110
                                    Beach (21-04-0539P).   City of North Myrtle Beach,     Department, 1018 2nd Avenue    advanceSearch.
                                                           1018 2nd Avenue South, North    South, North Myrtle Beach,
                                                           Myrtle Beach, SC 29582.         SC 29582.
Tennessee:
    Wilson.......................  City of Lebanon (20-   The Honorable Rick Bell,        Engineering Department, 200    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 28, 2021.........       470208
                                    04-4425P).             Mayor, City of Lebanon, 106     Castle Heights Avenue North,   advanceSearch.
                                                           North Castle Heights Avenue,    Lebanon, TN 37087.
                                                           Lebanon, TN 37087.
    Wilson.......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Randall Hutto,    Wilson County Planning         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 28, 2021.........       470207
                                    of Wilson County (20-  Mayor, Wilson County, 228       Department, 228 East Main      advanceSearch.
                                    04-4425P).             East Main Street, Room 104,     Street, Room 5, Lebanon, TN
                                                           Lebanon, TN 37087.              37087.
Texas:
    Dallas.......................  City of Irving (20-06- The Honorable Rick Stopfer,     Engineering Department, 825    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 2, 2021..........       480180
                                    2875P).                Mayor, City of Irving, 825      West Irving Boulevard,         advanceSearch.
                                                           West Irving Boulevard,          Irving, TX 75060.
                                                           Irving, TX 75060.
    Harris.......................  City of Houston (20-   The Honorable Sylvester         Floodplain Management          https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 2, 2021..........       480296
                                    06-2472P).             Turner, Mayor, City of          Department, 1002 Washington    advanceSearch.
                                                           Houston, P.O. Box 1562,         Avenue, Houston, TX 77002.
                                                           Houston, TX 77251.
    Rockwall.....................  City of Royse City     The Honorable Clay Ellis,       City Hall, 305 North Archer    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 9, 2021..........       480548
                                    (20-06-3214P).         Mayor Pro Tem, City of Royse    Road, Royse City, TX 75189.    advanceSearch.
                                                           City, P.O. Box 638, Royse
                                                           City, TX 75189.

    Tarrant......................  City of Fort Worth     The Honorable Betsy Price,      Department of Transportation   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 2, 2021..........       480596
                                    (21-06-0615P).         Mayor, City of Fort Worth,      and Public Works, 200 Texas    advanceSearch.
                                                           200 Texas Street, Fort Worth,   Street, Fort Worth, TX
                                                           TX 76102.                       76102.
    Tarrant......................  City of North          The Honorable Oscar Trevino,    City Hall, 4301 City Point     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 16, 2021.........       480607
                                    Richland Hills (21-    Jr., Mayor, City of North       Drive, North Richland Hills,   advanceSearch.
                                    06-0066P).             Richland Hills, 4301 City       TX 76180.
                                                           Point Drive, North Richland
                                                           Hills, TX 76180.
    Williamson...................  City of Cedar Park     The Honorable Corbin Van        Engineering Department, 450    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 30, 2021.........       481282
                                    (21-06-0028P).         Arsdale, Mayor, City of Cedar   Cypress Creek Road, Building   advanceSearch.
                                                           Park, 450 Cypress Creek Road,   1, Cedar Park, TX 78613.
                                                           Building 1, Cedar Park, TX
                                                           78613.
Vermont: Bennington..............  Town of Bennington     Mr. Stuart Hurd, Manager, Town  Town Hall, 205 South Street,   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 19, 2021.........       500013
                                    (20-01-1034P).         of Bennington, P.O. Box 469,    Bennington, VT 05201.          advanceSearch.
                                                           Bennington, VT 05201.
Virginia:
    Frederick....................  City of Winchester     The Honorable John David        Engineering Division, 15       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 10, 2021.........       510173
                                    (21-03-0704X).         Smith, Jr., Mayor, City of      North Cameron Street,          advanceSearch.
                                                           Winchester, 15 North Cameron    Winchester, VA 22601.
                                                           Street, Winchester, VA 22601.
    Frederick....................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Charles S.        Frederick County Zoning        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Aug. 10, 2021.........       510163
                                    of Frederick County    DeHaven, Jr., Chairman-at-      Department, 107 North Kent     advanceSearch.
                                    (21-03-0704X).         Large, Frederick County Board   Street, Suite 202,
                                                           of Supervisors, 107 North       Winchester, VA 22601.
                                                           Kent Street, Winchester, VA
                                                           22601.
West Virginia:
    Cabell.......................  City of Huntington     The Honorable Steve Williams,   Planning & and Zoning          https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 7, 2021..........       540018
                                    (21-03-0357P).         Mayor, City of Huntington,      Department, 800 5th Avenue,    advanceSearch.
                                                           P.O. Box 1659, Huntington, WV   Suite 2, Huntington, WV
                                                           25701.                          25701.
    Cabell.......................  Unincorporated areas   Ms. Beth Thompson, Cabell       Cabell County Assessor's       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 7, 2021..........       540016
                                    of Cabell County (21-  County Administrator, 750 5th   Office, 750 5th Avenue,        advanceSearch.
                                    03-0357P).             Avenue, Suite 300,              Suite 300, Huntington, WV
                                                           Huntington, WV 25701.           25701.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2021-09629 Filed 5-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P