ZIP FILES NOT IN ELECTRONIC DOCKET FOR NEBRASKA RH PROPOSAL EPA-R07-OAR-2012-0158
February 28, 2012

The following files are a part of the docket for this rulemaking, but were in file formats which could not be uploaded into the electronic docket.  If you would like copies of these files, please contact Chrissy Wolfersberger, EPA Region 7, at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

Chapter 8, Appendix 8.1: 2002 Emissions Inventory
Access Databases:
   * AREA_2002_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip
   * FIRE_2002_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip
   * MOBILE_2002_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip
   * OTHER_2002_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip
   * POINT_2002_SMOKE_REPORTS[1].zip
   * SMOKEREPORTS_2002.zip

Chapter 8, Appendix 8.2: 2018 Emissions Inventory
Access Databases:
   * ALL_SECTORS_2018_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip
   * AREA_2018_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip
   * FIRE_2018_REPORTS.zip
   * MOBILE_2018_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip
   * OTHER_2018_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip
   * POINT_2018_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip

Chapter 10, Appendix 10.5: Modeling Results
CALPOST files for Gerald Gentleman Station and Nebraska City Station:
   * MODELING CD  -  GGS.zip
   * MODELING CD  -  NCS.zip


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 20, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16193-16196]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6622]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0142; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-275-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700,
701, & 702), CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and CL-600-2D24
(Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by
reports of failures of a hydraulic accumulator's screw-cap/end cap
while on the ground that resulted in loss of use of that hydraulic
system and in high-energy impact damage to adjacent systems and
structures. This proposed AD would require an inspection for part
numbers; repetitive inspections for any cracking of certain hydraulic
system accumulators, and replacement, if necessary; and revising the
maintenance program to include a life limit for certain hydraulic
system accumulators. We are proposing this AD to prevent loss of use of
a hydraulic system, which could result in reduced controllability of
the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 4, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0142;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-275-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2010-35R1, dated June 28, 2011 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:

    Seven cases of on-ground hydraulic accumulator screw cap/end cap
failure have been experienced on CL-600-2B19 aeroplanes resulting in
loss of the associated hydraulic system and high-energy impact
damage to adjacent systems and structure. The lowest number of
flight cycles accumulated at the time of failure, to date, has been
6,991 flight cycles.
    Although there have been no failures to date on any CL-600-2C10,
CL-600-2D15 or CL-600-2D24 aeroplanes, similar accumulators to those
installed on the CL-600-2B19, are installed. The part numbers (P/Ns)
of the accumulators installed on CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15 and CL-
600-2D24 aeroplanes are 900096-1 (Hydraulic System No. 1 and
Hydraulic System No. 2 accumulators), 900097-1 (Hydraulic System No.
3 accumulator) and 08-60204-001 (Inboard Brake and Outboard Brake
accumulators).
    A detailed analysis of the calculated line of trajectory of a
failed screw cap/end cap for each of the accumulators has been
conducted, resulting in the identification of

several areas where systems and/or structural components could
potentially be damaged. Although all of the failures to date have
occurred on the ground, an in-flight failure affecting such
components could potentially have an adverse effect on the
controllability of the aeroplane.
    This [Canadian] directive gives instructions to conduct [an
inspection to determine if certain hydraulic accumulators are
installed and, if necessary,] repetitive ultrasonic inspections [for
cracking] of the Hydraulic System No. 1, Hydraulic System No. 2,
Hydraulic System No. 3, Inboard Brake and Outboard Brake
accumulators, P/Ns 900096-1, 900097-1, and 08-60204-001, that are
not identified by the letter ``M'' or ``T'' after the S/N [serial
number] on the identification plate.
* * * * *

    Required actions include revising the maintenance program to
include a life limit for certain accumulators, and for airplanes on
which cracking is found during an ultrasonic inspection, replacing the
accumulator with a new accumulator containing the letter ``M'' or
``T'', as applicable, after the serial number on the identification
plate or with a new accumulator with a different part number, and
eventual replacement of certain accumulators with new accumulators. You
may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Bombardier has issued the following service information.
     Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-29-011, Revision
A, dated July 27, 2010, including Appendix A, Revision A, dated July
26, 2010.
     Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-29-012, including
Appendix A, Revision A, dated July 27, 2010.
     Bombardier Service Bulletin A670BA-32-021, Revision C,
dated July 27, 2010, including Appendix A, Revision A, dated October
18, 2007.
     Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-29-013, Revision A,
dated July 27, 2010, including Appendix A, dated January 29, 2010.
     Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-026, Revision A,
dated July 27, 2010, including Appendix A, dated January 29, 2010.
     Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-29-014, dated December
22, 2010.
     Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-29-015, dated December
22, 2010.
     Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-028, dated December
22, 2010.
     Tasks 29-11-11-000-801 and 29-11-11-400-801 of Section
1.3, Safe Life Components, of Part 2, Airworthiness Limitations, of the
Bombardier CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15, CL-600-2D24, CL-600-2E25
Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP B-053, Revision 11, dated October
20, 2010.
    The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 389 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take up to 21 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $8,988 per product. Where
the service information lists required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these
parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be up to $4,190,697, or $10,773 per product, per inspection cycle.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take up to 7 work-hours and require parts costing $8,988, for a cost of
$9,583 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2012-0142; Directorate Identifier
2010-NM-275-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by May 4, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1)
and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category.
    (1) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700,
701, & 702) airplanes, with serial number (S/N) 10003 through 10314
inclusive.
    (2) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705)
and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, with S/N 15001
through 15259 inclusive.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 29: Hydraulic
Power, and 32: Landing Gear.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of failures of a hydraulic
accumulator's screw-cap/end cap while on the ground that resulted in
loss of use of that hydraulic system and in high-energy impact
damage to adjacent systems and structures. We are issuing this AD to
prevent loss of use of a hydraulic system, which could result in
reduced controllability of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Inspection for Part Numbers (P/Ns)

    At the applicable time specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2),
and (g)(3) of this AD, inspect the hydraulic accumulators in the
hydraulic systems No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3, and the inboard and
outboard brake systems, to determine the part number of the
accumulator. A review of airplane maintenance records is acceptable
in lieu of this inspection if the part number of the accumulator can
be conclusively determined from that review.
    (1) For an accumulator with more than 4,500 total flight cycles
as of the effective date of this AD, inspect that accumulator within
500 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD.
    (2) For an accumulator with 4,500 or less total flight cycles as
of the effective date of this AD, inspect that accumulator before it
has accumulated 5,000 total flight cycles.
    (3) If it is not possible to determine the total flight cycles
accumulated on an accumulator, inspect that accumulator within 500
flight cycles after the effective date of this AD.

(h) Inspection for Letter Designation After the Serial Number

    If, during an inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD,
an accumulator having P/N 900096-1 (for hydraulic systems No. 1 and
No. 2 accumulators), 900097-1 (for hydraulic system No. 3
accumulator), or 08-60204-001 (for inboard and outboard brake
accumulators) is found, at the applicable time specified in
paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD, do an inspection
of the identification plate on the hydraulic accumulator to
determine if an ``M'' (for hydraulic system accumulators) or a ``T''
(for brake system accumulators) follows the serial number on the
identification plate. A review of airplane maintenance records is
acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the part number and the
letter of the accumulator can be conclusively determined from that
review.

    Note 1 to paragraphs (h), (i), (k), (l)(2), and (m): The letter
``M'' after the serial number on the identification plate is
applicable to accumulators, P/Ns 900096-1 and 900097-1, on hydraulic
systems No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3. The letter ``T'' after the serial
number on the identification plate is applicable to accumulators, P/
N 08-60204-001, on the brake system.

(i) Initial Ultrasonic Inspections of Hydraulic System No. 1, Hydraulic
System No. 2, Hydraulic System No. 3, Inboard Brake, and Outboard Brake
Accumulators

    If, during any inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD,
any accumulator without the letter ``M'' (for hydraulic system
accumulators) or a ``T'' (for brake system accumulators) after the
serial number is found, at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD: Do an ultrasonic
inspection of the inner shoulders of the accumulator screw-cap for
cracking, in accordance with Part B of the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable Bombardier service bulletin
identified in paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3) of this AD, and
at the internal threads of the screw-caps, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable Bombardier service
bulletin identified in paragraphs (i)(4), (i)(5), and (i)(6) of this
AD.
    (1) For hydraulic system No. 1, and hydraulic system No. 2
accumulators: Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-29-011,
Revision A, dated July 27, 2010, including Appendix A, Revision A,
dated July 26, 2010.
    (2) For hydraulic system No. 3 accumulators: Bombardier Alert
Service Bulletin A670BA-29-012, including Appendix A, Revision A,
dated July 27, 2010.
    (3) For inboard brake, outboard brake accumulators: Bombardier
Service Bulletin A670BA-32-021, Revision C, dated July 27, 2010,
including Appendix A, Revision A, dated October 18, 2007.
    (4) For hydraulic system No. 1 accumulators: Bombardier Service
Bulletin 670BA-29-013, Revision A, dated July 27, 2010, including
Appendix A, dated January 29, 2010.
    (5) For hydraulic system No. 2 accumulators: Bombardier Service
Bulletin 670BA-29-013, Revision A, dated July 27, 2010, including
Appendix A, dated January 29, 2010.
    (6) For inboard brake, outboard brake accumulators: Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670BA-32-026, Revision A, dated July 27, 2010,
including Appendix A, dated January 29, 2010.

(j) No Cracking Found During Accomplishment of Paragraph (i) of This AD

    If no cracking is found during the inspections required by
paragraph (i) of this AD, do the actions required by paragraph (l)
of this AD.

(k) Any Cracking Found During Accomplishment of Paragraph (i) of This
AD

    If any cracking is found during the inspections required by
paragraph (i) of this AD, before further flight, replace the
accumulator with a new accumulator containing the letter ``M'' or
``T'', as applicable, after the serial number on the identification
plate, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service bulletin identified in paragraphs (i)(1) through
(i)(6) of this AD, or replace the accumulator with a new accumulator
as specified in paragraphs (k)(1) through (k)(3) of this AD, as
applicable.
    (1) For any cracked hydraulic system No. 1 or No. 2 accumulator,
replace the cracked accumulator with a new accumulator, P/N 900121-
1, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670BA-29-014, dated December 22, 2010.
    (2) For any cracked hydraulic system No. 3 accumulator, replace
the cracked accumulator with a new accumulator, P/N 900122-1, in
accordance with the replacement specified in paragraph (o) of this
AD.
    (3) For any cracked inboard brake or outboard brake accumulator
replaced the cracked accumulator with a new accumulator, P/N
90006691, in accordance with the replacement specified in paragraph
(p) of this AD.

(l) Repetitive Ultrasonic Inspections of Hydraulic System No. 1,
Hydraulic System No. 2, Hydraulic System No. 3, Inboard Brake, and
Outboard Brake Accumulators

    For each accumulator on which no cracking was found during any
inspection required by paragraph (i) of this AD, within 500 flight
cycles after the previous ultrasonic inspection, inspect the
accumulator in accordance with paragraph (i) of this AD.
    (1) If no cracking is found, do the actions required by
paragraph (l) of this AD and repeat thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 500 flight cycles.
    (2) If any cracking is found, before further flight, replace the
accumulator with a new accumulator containing the letter ``M'' or
``T'', as applicable, after the serial number on the identification
plate, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service bulletin identified in paragraphs (i)(1) through
(i)(6) of this AD, or replace the accumulator with a new accumulator
as specified in paragraphs (k)(1), (k)(2), and (k)(3) of this AD, as
applicable.

(m) Replacement of Hydraulic System No. 1 and No. 2 Accumulators

    For airplanes on which a hydraulic system No. 1 or No. 2
accumulator having P/N 900096-1 without the letter ``M'' after the
serial number is installed: At the applicable time specified in
paragraphs (m)(1) and (m)(2) of this AD, replace the accumulator

with a new one having P/N 900096-1 with the letter ``M'' after the
serial number; or having P/N 900121-1, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-29-
014, dated December 22, 2010.
    (1) For an accumulator with more than 19,500 total flight cycles
as of the effective date of this AD, replace that accumulator within
500 flight cycles after accomplishing the most recent inspection
required by paragraph (i) or (l) of this AD.
    (2) For an accumulator with 19,500 or less total flight cycles
as of the effective date of this AD, replace that accumulator before
it has accumulated 20,000 total flight cycles.
    (3) If it is not possible to determine the total flight cycles
accumulated on an accumulator, replace that accumulator within 500
flight cycles after accomplishing the most recent ultrasonic
inspection required by paragraph (i) or (l) of this AD.

(n) Hydraulic System Safe Life Limit Introduction

    Within 60 days after the effective date or this AD, revise the
maintenance program to include a safe life limit for the hydraulic
system No. 1 and No. 2 accumulators, P/N 900096-1, by incorporating
Tasks 29-11-11-000-801 and 29-11-11-400-801 of Section 1.3, Safe
Life Components, of Part 2, Airworthiness Limitations, of the
Bombardier CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15, CL-600-2D24, CL-600-2E25
Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP B-053, Revision 11, dated
October 20, 2010.

(o) Replacement of Hydraulic System No. 3 Accumulator

    Within 4,000 flight cycles or 24 months after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first, replace any hydraulic system No.
3 accumulator having P/N 900097-1 with a new accumulator having P/N
900122-1, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-29-015, dated December 22, 2010.

(p) Replacement of Inboard or Outboard Brake System Accumulators

    Within 4,000 flight cycles or 24 months after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first, replace any inboard or outboard
brake system accumulator having P/N 08-60204-001 with a new
accumulator having P/N 90006691, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-
028, dated December 22, 2010.

(q) Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information

    (1) Actions done before the effective date of this AD using Part
B of the Accomplishment Instructions of the Bombardier service
bulletin identified in paragraph (q)(1)(i), (q)(1)(ii), (q)(1)(iii),
(q)(1)(iv), or (q)(1)(v) of this AD is acceptable for compliance
with the corresponding requirements of this AD.
    (i) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-29-011, dated
October 18, 2007.
    (ii) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-29-012, dated
March 13, 2008.
    (iii) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-32-021, dated
November 21, 2006.
    (iv) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-32-021, Revision
A, dated March 7, 2007.
    (v) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-32-021, Revision B,
dated October 18, 2007.
    (2) Actions done before the effective date of this AD using the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-29-
013, dated January 29, 2010; or 670BA-32-026, dated January 29,
2010; are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding
requirements of this AD.

(r) Terminating Actions

    Accomplishing the actions required by paragraphs (m), (n), (o),
and (p) of this AD terminates the requirements of this AD for the
accumulator at that location only.

(s) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office, ANE-170, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the manager of the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 516-794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(t) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2010-35R1,
dated June 28, 2011, and the service information identified in
paragraphs (t)(1) through (t)(9) of this AD, for related
information.
    (1) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-29-011, Revision A,
dated July 27, 2010, including Appendix A, Revision A, dated July
26, 2010.
    (2) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-29-012, including
Appendix A, Revision A, dated July 27, 2010.
    (3) Bombardier Service Bulletin A670BA-32-021, Revision C, dated
July 27, 2010, including Appendix A, Revision A, dated October 18,
2007.
    (4) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-29-013, Revision A, dated
July 27, 2010, including Appendix A, dated January 29, 2010.
    (5) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-026, Revision A, dated
July 27, 2010, including Appendix A, dated January 29, 2010.
    (6) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-29-014, dated December 22,
2010.
    (7) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-29-015, dated December 22,
2010.
    (8) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-028, dated December 22,
2010.
    (9) Tasks 29-11-11-000-801 and 29-11-11-400-801 of Section 1.3,
Safe Life Components, of Part 2, Airworthiness Limitations, of the
Bombardier CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15, CL-600-2D24, CL-600-2E25
Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP B-053, Revision 11, dated
October 20, 2010.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 26, 2012.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-6622 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: February 6, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 25)]
[Notices]
[Page 6957]
[DOCID:fr06fe08-47]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP08-55-000]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Application

January 29, 2008.
    Take notice that on January 15, 2008, Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company (Tennessee), 1001 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas 77002, filed
an abbreviated application pursuant to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas
Act for authorization to acquire certain onshore and offshore natural
gas facilities located in the Gulf of Mexico and Louisiana from
Columbia Gulf Transmission Company (Columbia Gulf) and Columbia Deep
Water Services Company, an affiliate of Columbia Gulf. The facilities
include the Blue Water System, the South Timbalier System and the South
Pass 77 System, as well as several contiguous pipeline laterals that
are connected to these three systems and certain supply laterals, all
as more fully set forth in the application. In addition, to the
acquisition of facilities, Tennessee seeks authorization pursuant to
section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act to abandon Tennessee's lease of
115,000 Mcf per day of capacity to Columbia Gulf from the terminus of
the South Pass 77 System to Columbia Gulf's mainline system at Egan,
Louisiana; abandon Rate Schedules X-33 and X-56; and abandon two
compressor units at the Pecan Island Facility, each with 20,000
horsepower, and one 4,000 horsepower compressor unit on the Vermilion
Block 245 offshore platform. This filing is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''

link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, please
contact FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free
at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any initial questions regarding Tennessee's proposal in this
application should be directed to Jacquelyne M. Rocan, Senior Counsel,
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, 1001 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas
77002-2511; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant. On or before the comment date, it is
not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons
other than the Applicant.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit the

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    Comment Date: February 19, 2008.

 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-2108 Filed 2-5-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: April 14, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 71)]
[Notices]
[Page 19413-19414]
[DOCID:fr14ap10-86]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[USCG-2010-0231]

Information Collection Request to Office of Management and
Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625-0089.

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Sixty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request
(ICR) and Analysis to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
requesting an approval for re-instatement with change of the following
collection of information: 1625-0089, National Recreational Boating
Survey. Before submitting this ICR to OMB, the Coast Guard is inviting
comments as described below.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before June 14, 2010.

ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate submissions to the docket [USCG-2010-
0231], please use only one of the following means:
    (1) Online: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Mail: Docket Management Facility (DMF) (M-30), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT), West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (3) Hand Deliver: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The DMF maintains the public docket for this Notice. Comments and
material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in
this Notice as being available in the docket, will become part of the
docket and will be available for inspection or copying at room W12-140
on the West Building Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also find the docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available from:
Commandant (CG-611), Attn Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, U.S. Coast
Guard, 2100 2nd St., SW., Stop 7101, Washington, DC 20593-7101.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Arthur Requina, Office of
Information Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for questions on these documents. Contact Ms. Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations,<PHONE_NUMBER>, for questions on the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be
granted based on the collection being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information
subject to the collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
collections on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. We will post all comments received, without
change, to http://www.regulations.gov. They will include any personal
information you provide. We have an agreement with DOT to use their
DMF. Please see the ``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.
    Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include the
docket number [USCG-2010-0231], indicate the specific section of the
document to which each comment applies, providing a reason for each
comment. We recommend you include your name, mailing address, an e-mail
address, or other contact information in the body of your document so
that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
You may submit your comments and material by electronic means, mail,
fax, or delivery to the DMF at the address under ADDRESSES; but please
submit them by only one means. If you submit them by mail or delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no

larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic
filing.
    If you submit them by mail and would like to know that they reached
the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period and will address them accordingly.
    Viewing comments and documents: Go to http://www.regulations.gov to
view documents mentioned in this Notice as being available in the
docket. Click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2010-0231''
and click ``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the
``Actions'' column. You may also visit the DMF in room W12-140 on the
West Building Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
    Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments
received in dockets by the name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the Privacy
Act statement regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008
issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Information Collection Request

    Title: National Recreational Boating Survey.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0089.
    Summary: The Coast Guard National Recreational Boating Survey
collects data on recreational boating participation and exposure to
hazards. The goal is for the Office of Boating Safety to draw a general
statistical profile of the U.S. recreational boating population. Of
particular importance will be statistics on the type of boats used,
activities associated with them, boat operators' knowledge of safety
measures, and duration of a typical boating day (referred to as
``exposure''). Exposure data will be used to derive a reliable measure
of the risk associated with recreational boating that can be used in
all jurisdictions.
    Need: The Federal Boat Safety Act of 1971 determines the framework
of the Coast Guard Recreational Boating Safety Program. This Program,
as set forth in 46 U.S.C., Chapter 131, requires the Coast Guard to
``encourage greater State participation and uniformity in boating
safety efforts, and particularly to permit the States to assume a
greater share of boating safety education, assistance, and enforcement
activities.'' See 46 U.S.C. 13102. The Coast Guard Office of Boating
Safety achieves these goals by providing timely and relevant
information on subject activities that occur in each respective
jurisdiction. The boating information provided by the Coast Guard
enables each State agency to tailor and implement safety initiatives
addressing specific needs of boaters in local jurisdictions. The
primary objective of this collection is to provide the Coast Guard with
the required information in a format suitable to effectively manage the
Program.
    Forms: None.
    Respondents: Recreational boating participants and owners of
recreational vessels.
    Frequency: Every two years.
    Burden Estimate: This is a biennial requirement. In the year the
survey is conducted, the burden is estimated to be 10,880 hours.

    Dated: April 7, 2010.
M.B. Lytle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Assistant Commandant for Command,
Control, Communications, Computers and Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2010-8473 Filed 4-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 156 (Monday, August 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 50077]
[FR Doc No: 2022-17489]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR22-5-000]

TransMontaigne Partners LLC and TransMontaigne Operating Company
LP v. Colonial Pipeline Company; Notice of Complaint

    Take notice that on August 8, 2022, pursuant to sections 1(4),
1(6), 3, 6, 13(1), and 15(1) of the Interstate Commerce Act (ICA), 49
U.S.C. App. 1(4), 1(6), 3, 6, 13(1), and 15(1); Rule 206 of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 (2021); and Rules 343.1(a) and 343.2(c) of
the Commission's Procedural Rules Applicable to Oil Pipeline
Proceedings, 18 CFR 343.1(a) and 343.2(c) (2021), TransMontaigne
Partners LLC and TransMontaigne Operating Company LP (collectively
TransMontaigne or Complainants) filed a formal complaint against
Colonial Pipeline Company, (Colonial or Respondent) challenging the
lawfulness of Colonial's denial of In-Transit storage privileges
associated with TransMontaigne's Collins, Mississippi terminal/storage
facility and the corresponding rate structure and terms and conditions
of service, all as more fully explained in the complaint.
    The Complainant certifies that copies of the complaint were served
on the contacts listed for Respondent in the Commission's list of
Corporate Officials.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically may mail
similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in
docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services,
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 7, 2022.

    Dated: August 9, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-17489 Filed 8-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45472-45473]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20821]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R02-OAR-2016-0413; FRL-9968-63-Region 2]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Jersey;
Regional Haze Five-Year Progress Report State Implementation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving New
Jersey's regional haze progress report, submitted on June 28, 2016, as
a revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP). New Jersey's SIP
revision addresses requirements of the Clean Air Act and the EPA's
rules that require each state to submit periodic reports describing
progress towards reasonable progress goals established for regional
haze and a determination of the adequacy of the state's existing
regional haze SIP. The EPA is approving New Jersey's determination that
the State's regional haze SIP is adequate to meet these reasonable
progress goals for the first implementation period which extends
through 2018.

DATES: This rule is effective on October 30, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R02-OAR-2016-0413. All documents in the docket are
listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential
business information or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available through www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person
identified in the For Further Information Contact section for
additional availability information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kirk J. Wieber, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
New York 10278,<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Under the Regional Haze Rule,\1\ each state was required to submit
its first implementation plan addressing regional haze visibility
impairment to the EPA no later than December 17, 2007. See 40 CFR
51.308(b). New Jersey submitted its regional haze plan on July 28,
2009. On January 3, 2012, the EPA approved New Jersey's regional haze
SIP submittal addressing the requirements of the first implementation
period for regional haze. 77 FR 19 (Jan.3, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 40 CFR part 51, subpart P.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Each state is also required to submit a progress report in the form
of a SIP revision that evaluates progress towards the reasonable
progress goals (RPGs) for each mandatory Class I Federal area within
the state and for each mandatory Class I Federal area outside the state
which may be affected by emissions from within the state. See 40 CFR
51.308(g). Each state is also required to submit, at the same time as
the progress report, a determination of the adequacy of its existing
regional haze SIP. See 40 CFR 51.308(h). The progress report SIP was
due five years after submittal of the initial regional haze SIP.
    On June 28, 2016, New Jersey submitted to the EPA, as a revision to
its SIP, a report on progress made towards the RPGs for Class I areas
in the State and for Class I areas outside the State that are affected
by emissions from sources within the State. In its progress report SIP,
New Jersey concludes the elements and strategies relied on in its
original regional haze SIP are sufficient to enable New Jersey and
neighboring states to meet all established RPGs. In a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published on August 1, 2017 (82 FR 35734),
the EPA proposed to approve New Jersey's progress report as satisfying
the requirements of 40 CFR 51.308(g) and 51.308(h). No comments were
received on the August 1, 2017 proposed rulemaking.

II. Final Action

    EPA is finalizing approval of New Jersey's Regional Haze Progress
Report SIP revision, submitted by New Jersey on June 28, 2016, as
meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 51.308(g) and 51.308(h).

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate,

the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register.
A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in
the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 28, 2017. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.

    Dated: September 19, 2017.
Catherine R. McCabe,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 2.

    Part 52 chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart FF--New Jersey

0
2. In Sec.  52.1570(e), the table titled ``EPA APPROVED NEW JERSEY
NONREGULATORY AND QUASI-REGULATORY PROVISIONS'' is amended by adding
the entry ``Regional Haze Five-Year Progress Report'' at the end of the
table to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1570  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                                          EPA-Approved New Jersey Nonregulatory and Quasi-Regulatory Provisions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Applicable geographic or
            SIP element                      nonattainment area            New Jersey  submittal date      EPA approval date           Explanation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      * * * * * * *
Regional Haze Five-Year Progress     State-wide........................  June 28, 2016................  September 29, 2017,     ........................
 Report.                                                                                [Federal Register
                                                                                page citation].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-20821 Filed 9-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: December 12, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 238)]
[Notices]
[Page 70580]
[DOCID:fr12de07-33]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR08-4-000]

Valero Marketing and Supply Company Complainant, v. Longhorn
Pipeline Partners and Flying J, Inc. Respondents; Notice of Complaint

December 4, 2007.
    Take notice that on November 30, 2007, Valero Marketing and Supply
Company (VMSC), tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission a complaint against Longhorn Pipeline Partners (Longhorn)
and Flying J, Inc., (Flying J), for undue discrimination and
unreasonable preferential treatment of an affiliate in the
transportation of refined petroleum products on Longhorn's common
carrier pipeline. VMSC alleges that Longhorn, acting in concert with
its affiliate owner, Flying J, engaged in unduly preferential and
abusive affiliate activity and unreasonably discriminated against VMSC,
resulting in an undue economic advantage, by refusing to provide common
carrier transportation services to VMSC in violation of the Interstate
Commerce Act. VMSC therefore requests that the Commission set this
complaint for investigation, discovery, and hearing and that
reparations and damages be awarded to compensate VMSC for injuries
incurred as a result of Longhorn's and Flying J's unlawful and illegal
actions. In addition, VMSC requests the Commission order disgorgement
of all improper profits and benefits obtained by Flying J as a result
of the complained of activity.
    VMSC states that copies of the complaint were served on Longhorn
and Flying J.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on December 20, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-24029 Filed 12-11-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 123 (Thursday, June 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36313-36314]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14887]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2013-0458; FRL 9912-35-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Chemical-Specific Rules, TSCA Section 8(a)
(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has submitted the following information collection request
(ICR), to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.): Chemical-Specific Rules, TSCA Section 8(a) (EPA ICR No.
1198.10, OMB Control No. 2070-0067). EPA did not receive any comments
in response to the previously provided public review opportunity issued
in the Federal Register on November 22, 2013 (78 FR 70037). With this
submission, EPA is providing an additional 30 days for public comments.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments muse be submitted on or before July 28, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OPPT-2013-0458, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method) or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, or
information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela Myrick, Deputy Director,
Environmental Assistance Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics, Mail code: 7408M, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202-554-
1404; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Docket: Supporting documents, including the ICR that explains in
detail the information collection activities and the related burden and
cost estimates which is summarized in this document, are available in
the docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, William
Jefferson Clinton (WJC) West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is 202-566-
1744. For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit
http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    ICR Title: Chemical-Specific Rules, TSCA Section 8(a).
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No.1198.10, OMB Control No. 2070-0067.
    ICR status: The current OMB approval for this ICR is scheduled to
expire on June 30, 2014. Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue
to conduct or sponsor the collection of information while this
submission is pending at OMB.
    Abstract: Section 8(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
authorizes EPA to promulgate rules that require persons who
manufacture, import or process chemical substances and mixtures, or who
propose to manufacture, import, or process chemical substances and
mixtures, to maintain such records and submit such reports to EPA as
may be reasonably required. Any chemical covered by TSCA for which EPA
or another Federal agency has a reasonable need for information and
which cannot be satisfied via other sources is a proper potential
subject for a Chemical-Specific TSCA Section 8(a) Rulemaking.
Information that may be collected under TSCA section 8(a) includes, but
is not limited to, chemical names; categories of use; production or
processing volume, byproducts of chemical production, processing, use
or disposal; existing data concerning environmental and health effects;
exposure data; and disposal information.
    Generally, EPA uses chemical-specific information under TSCA
section 8(a) to evaluate the potential for adverse human health and
environmental effects caused by the manufacture (including import),
processing, use or disposal of identified chemical substances and
mixtures. Additionally, EPA may use TSCA section 8(a) information to
assess the need or set priorities for testing and/or further regulatory
action. To the extent that the submitter considers the reported
information not to be confidential, environmental groups, environmental
justice advocates, state and local government entities and other
members of the public will also have access to this information for
their use.
    Respondents may claim all or part of a response confidential. EPA
will disclose information that is covered by a claim of confidentiality
only to the extent permitted by, and in accordance with, the procedures
in TSCA section 14 and 40 CFR part 2.
    Respondents/affected entities: Entities potentially affected by
this action are primarily those businesses that fall under NAICS codes
325, Chemical Manufacturers and Processors, and 324110, Petroleum
Refineries.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (see 40 CFR 704).
    Estimated number of respondents: 4 (total).
    Frequency of response: On occasion.
    Total estimated burden: 275 hours per year. Burden is defined at 5
CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $16,551 per year, includes $0 annualized
capital or operation and maintenance costs.
    Changes in the estimates: There is no change in the number of hours
in the total estimated respondent burden compared with that identified
in the ICR currently approved by OMB.

Spencer W. Clark,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-14887 Filed 6-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75223-75225]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29511]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73815; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2014-121]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Modify NASDAQ Rule 7021 Fees

December 11, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 5, 2014, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and
III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    NASDAQ is proposing to modify fees assessed under NASDAQ Rule 7021
for the NasdaqTrader.com Trading and Compliance Data Package (``Data
Package''). While the changes proposed herein are effective upon
filing, the Exchange has designated that the amendments be operative on
January 2, 2015.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at
nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com at NASDAQ's principal office, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NASDAQ included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    NASDAQ is proposing to amend Rule 7021 to increase the fee assessed
for subscription to the Data Package and eliminate a little-used
report.\3\  The Data Package allows member firms to obtain information
regarding their own historical quoting and trading activity on NASDAQ.
The Data Package also provides member firms with information concerning
their compliance with NASDAQ and FINRA rules. When NASDAQ last
increased the fees for the Data Package in February 2012,\4\ the
service provided subscribers the following reports: Monthly Compliance
Report Cards, which outline a firm's own compliance with various FINRA
rules; Monthly Summaries, which provide monthly trading volume
statistics for the top 50 market participants broken down by industry
sector, security or type of trading; and Historical Research Reports,
which provide a variety of historical trading data such as a market
maker's quote updates, order activity, and detailed trade reporting
information. Additionally, NASDAQ offered subscribers the ability to
receive the detailed trade report (Equity Trade Journal) via a secure
FTP dissemination as an option. These reports, which continue to be
offered as part of Data Package, are based on the subscribing member
firm's historical trade

information taken from NASDAQ and the FINRA/NASDAQ Trade Reporting
Facility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Data Package is also commonly referred to as the Report
Center.
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66078 (January 3,
2012), 77 FR 1125 (January 9, 2012) (SR-NASDAQ-2011-173).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NASDAQ has continued to enhance what is offered in the Data Package
to make it a more useful tool to member firms.\5\ In this regard,
NASDAQ now provides the following new historical reports, which do not
count toward the 25 and 100 monthly report limits under the rule when
accessed: Execution Invoice Detail, which provides a member firm with
enhanced detail of its executions; Month to Date Invoice Summary, which
provides a member firm with a summary of its trading at any point in
the month; Excessive Messaging Invoice Detail, which informs a member
firm of whether its order activity at any point in a month will qualify
for the Excess Order Fee under Rule 7018(m); Investor Support Program
Invoice Detail, which informs a member firm of whether its order
activity at any point in the month will qualify for the Investor
Support Program under Rule 7014; and Qualified Market Maker Invoice
Detail, which informs a member firm of whether its order activity at
any point in the month will qualify for the Qualified Market Maker
Program under Rule 7014. In addition, NASDAQ has enhanced the service
with the following new reports, which do count toward the 25 and 100
monthly report limits under the rule when accessed: NASDAQ Order
Execution and Routing, which provides a detailed daily summary of a
member firm's executions on NASDAQ and those routed to other markets;
Market Recap, which provides a daily snapshot in a timeline format of
all market events occurring during the day, such as trading halts and
limit up/limit down pauses; QView \6\ Historical Reports, which provide
both daily and monthly summaries of trading based on volume, routing
strategy, and order type; and Real-Time Registered Market Maker Report,
which provides a market maker with a real-time assessment of whether it
is meeting its market making obligations in the securities for which it
is a market maker. NASDAQ is also proposing to eliminate the Monthly
Compliance Report Card report from the service. NASDAQ notes that the
report is not used significantly by subscribers to the service. In
addition to having very little demand, the Monthly Compliance Report
Card is similar to reports offered by FINRA at no cost.\7\ NASDAQ
currently offers two monthly Data Package subscriptions: a basic
subscription of $175 providing up to 25 reports per month; and a
premium subscription of $225 providing up to 100 reports per month. As
noted above, NASDAQ last increased the fee for Data Package in February
2012,\8\ and since then has enhanced the service with several new
reports noted above. NASDAQ is proposing to increase the monthly fee
assessed for up to 100 reports from $225 to $250 to cover the costs
associated with enhancing and offering the service, and to ensure that
the service continues to provide NASDAQ with a profit. In addition to
increasing the fee assessed for the 100 report subscription, NASDAQ is
proposing to eliminate the basic level subscription. As described
above, NASDAQ has substantially increased the number of reports
available to subscribers, including those that count against the
monthly report limits of the two fee tiers. As a consequence, NASDAQ
has observed that the lower tier provides an inadequate number of
reports to be useful to most subscribers. Accordingly, NASDAQ is
proposing to eliminate the lower tier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/trader.aspx?id=reportcenter.
    \6\ QView provides a member firm with the ability to track its
order flow on NASDAQ, and view both real-time data and download
reports of such order flow. See Rule 7058. Data Package offers QView
historical data, but not real-time reports of order flow.
    \7\ FINRA offers Equity Report Cards, which allow firms to track
their compliance with equity trading rules related to OATS, best
execution, market order timeliness, trade reporting, Reg NMS Trade
Throughs, and the NASDAQ Market Center. See http://www.finra.org/Industry/Compliance/ReportCenter/P015063.
    \8\ Supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Lastly, NASDAQ is proposing to rename the service as the NASDAQ
Report Center. NASDAQ notes that the service is commonly referred to as
the Report Center, and changing the name to reflect the commonly-used
name will avoid any market participant confusion caused by the two
names. Moreover, NASDAQ believes that the proposed new name is more
reflective of the nature of the service.
2. Statutory Basis
    NASDAQ believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\9\ in general, and with
Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any
facility or system which the Exchange operates or controls, and is
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest; and are not
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NASDAQ believes that the proposed increase to the fee assessed
under the rule is reasonable because it will allow NASDAQ to realign
the fees assessed for the service with the costs it incurs in offering
and enhancing it, while also ensuring that NASDAQ continues to realize
a profit. The Exchange notes that it has substantially enhanced the
service since the last time the fee was increased. Moreover,
eliminating the lower tier is reasonable because NASDAQ has observed
that the 25 report limit is too low for most member firms given the
expansion of reports available to them through the service. As a
consequence, the lower tier has limited applicability, yet represents a
cost to NASDAQ in monitoring and administering the fee in relation to a
subscriber's usage.
    NASDAQ believes that the increased fee and elimination of the lower
fee tier is an equitable allocation because the increased fee will
apply to all subscribers uniformly. NASDAQ notes that under the
proposed changes member firms currently subscribing to the lower tier
will experience a greater fee increase than those currently subscribing
to the higher tier. NASDAQ believes elimination of the lower tier is
equitable because the limited number of member firms that subscribe to
the lower tier will receive the benefit of a substantially increased
monthly report limit.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed changes are not unfairly
discriminatory because they now apply a uniform fee per subscription,
thus eliminating a distinction made in the fee assessed based on the
number of reports available per month. The Exchange notes that some
member firms may incur a disproportionate increase in fees as compared
to others under the proposed change as a result of the elimination of
the lower tier subscription. The Exchange does not believe that this
change is unfairly discriminatory because it eliminates a distinction
in the fee assessed based on the number of reports, which is of
declining applicability and use, and provides all member firms with the
same level of service at the same cost.

As noted, NASDAQ incurs costs in monitoring a subscribing member firm's
report limit and in administering the fee. Consequently, reducing the
number of fee tiers will reduce NASDAQ's costs, thereby allowing NASDAQ
to keep the fee lower than it would otherwise be. In addition, NASDAQ
does not believe that elimination of the Monthly Compliance Report Card
reports from the service is unfairly discriminatory. As noted, the
report is used very little by subscribing member firms and any member
firm that seeks similar information may obtain similar reports from
FINRA at no cost.
    Lastly, NASDAQ believes that the proposed name change will avoid
any market participant confusion due to the name of the service used in
the rule and the commonly-used name. NASDAQ notes that the proposed
change does not affect what is offered by the service in any way.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    NASDAQ does not believe that the proposed rule changes will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.\11\ NASDAQ notes
that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market
participants can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels
at a particular venue to be excessive. In such an environment, NASDAQ
must carefully balance the fees it assesses with the costs incurred to
remain competitive with other exchanges. To the extent NASDAQ's fees
are too high or another exchange's products and services provide
greater value, NASDAQ will likely lose subscriber revenue. As such,
NASDAQ believes that the degree to which fee changes in this market may
impose any burden on competition is extremely limited. In this
instance, NASDAQ last increased the Data Package fees in February 2012
and NASDAQ is now realigning the fee assessed for the subscription to
the service with the costs it incurs in offering it. Such costs include
adding enhancements to the service to make it more useful to
subscribers. Moreover, increasing the fees also allows NASDAQ to
continue to derive a profit from the service, which will allow NASDAQ
to continue to offer the service in the long term. Moreover, NASDAQ
believes that the fee increase does not impose a burden on competition
because the service is optional and member firms may develop their own
alternatives to the service or acquire similar functionality through
third parties. For these reasons, NASDAQ does not believe that the
proposed changes will impose any unnecessary burden on competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act,\12\ and paragraph (f) \13\ of Rule 19b-4,
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2014-121 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2014-121. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2014-
121, and should be submitted on or before January 7, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29511 Filed 12-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 127 (Friday, July 1, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 43194]
[FR Doc No: 2016-15586]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL16-66-000]

Midwest Generation, LLC; Notice of Institution of Section 206
Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On June 21, 2016, the Commission issued an order in Docket No.
EL16-66-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16
U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into the justness and
reasonableness of Midwest Generation, LLC's Reactive Supply tariff
rate. Midwest Generation, LLC, 155 FERC ] 61,289 (2016).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL16-66-000, established
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication
of this notice in the Federal Register.

    Dated: June 22, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-15586 Filed 6-30-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: April 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 77)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 20942]
[DOCID:fr22ap10-16]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2005-NM-0007; FRL-9140-1]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
New Mexico; Transportation Conformity Requirement for Bernalillo County

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the New Mexico State
Implementation Plan (SIP) at New Mexico Administrative Code 20.11.3,
concerning transportation conformity rules for Bernalillo County, New
Mexico. The plan revision is intended to ensure consistency with
amendments to the federal Transportation Conformity Rule. These plan
revisions meet statutory and regulatory requirements, and are
consistent with EPA's guidance.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before May 24, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Please see the related direct final rule, which is located
in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, for
detailed instructions on how to submit comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Riley, Air Planning Section
(6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number
214-665-7263; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document proposes to take action on SIP
revisions submitted by the Governor of New Mexico on behalf of the
Albuquerque Environmental Health Department. We have published a direct
final rule approving the State's SIP revisions in the ``Rules and
Regulations'' section of this Federal Register because we view this as
a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment. We have
explained our reasons for this action in the preamble to the direct
final rule.
    If we receive no adverse comment, we will not take further action
on this proposed rule. If we receive adverse comment, we will withdraw
the direct final rule and it will not take effect. We would address all
public comments in any subsequent final rule based upon this proposed
rule.
    We do not intend to institute a second comment period on this
action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
For further information, please see the information provided in the
ADDRESSES section of this document.

    Dated: April 9, 2010.
Lawrence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2010-9197 Filed 4-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 135 (Monday, July 15, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33721-33722]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14880]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1983-0002; FRL-9996-41-Region 6]

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of the comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reopening the
comment period for a proposed rule published on July 31, 2018. In the
July 31, 2018 notice of proposed rulemaking, EPA proposed to delete
portions of the South Valley Superfund Site from the National
Priorities List. EPA is reopening the comment period subsequent to a
meeting requested by commenters to discuss the partial deletion
activities. All comments submitted from the July 31, 2018, initiation
of the original comment period will be accepted.

DATES: The comment period for the proposed rule published on July 31,
2018 (83 FR 36838) is reopened. Comments must be received by August 14,
2019. All comments received will be entered into the public record and
considered by EPA before taking final action on the proposed rule.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1983-0002, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary

submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance
on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Mail: Michael A. Hebert, Remedial Project Manager, EPA
Region 6, Mail Code--6SEDRL, 1201 Elm Street, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas
75270-2102.
     Hand delivery:
    [cir] Michael A. Hebert, Remedial Project Manager, EPA Region 6,
Mail Code--6SEDRL, 5th Floor Reception Area, 1201 Elm Street, Suite
500, Dallas, Texas 75270-2102.
    [cir] Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal
hours of operation (Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 4 p.m.) except for
Federal holidays and special arrangements should be made for deliveries
of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
1983-0002. The http://www.regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous
access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an email comment directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in the hard
copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
Zimmerman Library, Government Information Department University of New
Mexico, Albuquerque NM 87131,<PHONE_NUMBER>:

Monday-Thursday--7 a.m.-2 a.m.
Friday--7 a.m.-9 p.m.
Saturday--10 a.m.-6 p.m.
Sunday--12 p.m.-2 a.m.

    New Mexico Environment Department, Harold Runnels Building, 1190
St. Francis Drive, Santa Fe, NM 87505,<PHONE_NUMBER>: Monday-Friday 8
a.m.-5 p.m.
    In addition, documents concerning the site can be found at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/south-valley.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael A. Hebert, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Mail Code--
6SEDRL, 1201 Elm Street, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 75270-2102, (214)
665-8315, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed rule published on July 31, 2018
at 83 FR 36838 provides information about NPL Deletion Criteria, NPL
Deletion Procedures, and the Basis for the South Valley site partial
deletion.

    Dated: June 26, 2019.
David Gray,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2019-14880 Filed 7-12-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P