[Federal Register: June 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 114)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33724-33729]
[DOCID:fr15jn10-19]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1999-0013; FRL-9162-3]

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the Many Diversified
Interests, Inc. Superfund Site

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 6 is
publishing a direct final Notice of Deletion of the soils of Operable
Unit 1 and the underlying ground water of the approximately 8-acre
western portion of Operable Unit 1 of the Many Diversified Interests,
Inc. (MDI) Superfund Site located in Houston, Texas (Harris County),
from the National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL, promulgated pursuant
to Section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an
appendix of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct final partial deletion is being
published by EPA with the concurrence of the State of Texas, through
the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, because EPA has
determined that all appropriate response actions at these identified
parcels under CERCLA have been completed. However, this partial
deletion does not preclude future actions under Superfund.
    This partial deletion pertains to the soils of Operable Unit 1 and
the underlying ground water of the approximately 8-acre western portion
of Operable Unit 1 of the MDI Superfund Site. Operable Unit 2, Operable
Unit 3, and the ground water underlying the remainder of Operable Unit
1 will remain on the NPL and are not being considered for deletion as
part of this action.

DATES: This direct final partial deletion is effective August 16, 2010
unless EPA receives adverse comments by July 15, 2010. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final partial deletion in the Federal Register informing the
public that the partial deletion will not take effect.

ADDRESSES:  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1999-0013, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow internet on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail: Rafael Casanova<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Rafael A. Casanova; U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 6; Superfund Division (6SF-RA); 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite
1200; Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 6; 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700; Dallas, Texas 75202-2733;
Contact: Rafael A. Casanova<PHONE_NUMBER>. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-AFUND-
1999-0013. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is

an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
    1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6; 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700; Dallas, Texas 75202-2733; Hours of operation: Monday
thru Friday, 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. Contact: Rafael A.
Casanova<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    2. Blanche Kelso Bruce Music Magnet Elementary School; 510 Jensen;
Houston, Texas 77020; Hours of operation: Monday thru Friday, 9 a.m. to
3:30 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rafael A. Casanova, Remedial Project
Manager; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6; Superfund
Division (6SF-RA); 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200; Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Partial Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Partial Deletion
V. Partial Deletion Action

I. Introduction

    EPA Region 6 is publishing this direct final Notice of Partial
Deletion for the Many Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund Site
(Site), from the National Priorities List (NPL). This partial deletion
pertains to the soils of Operable Unit 1 and the underlying ground
water of the approximately 8-acre western portion of Operable Unit 1 of
the Site. The NPL constitutes appendix B of 40 CFR part 300 which is
the Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP),
which EPA promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of
1980, as amended. EPA maintains the NPL as the list of sites that
appear to present a significant risk to public health, welfare, or the
environment. Sites on the NPL may be the subject of remedial actions
financed by the Hazardous Substance Superfund (Fund). This partial
deletion of the Many Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund Site is
proposed in accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e) and is consistent with
the Notice of Policy Change: Partial Deletion of Sites Listed on the
National Priorities List. 60 FR 55466 (Nov. 1, 1995). As described in
300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a portion of a site deleted from the NPL
remains eligible for Fund-financed remedial action if future conditions
warrant such actions.
    Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, this action will be effective August 16, 2010 unless EPA
receives adverse comments by July 15, 2010. Along with this direct
final Notice of Partial Deletion, EPA is co-publishing a Notice of
Intent for Partial Deletion in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of the
Federal Register. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day
public comment period on this partial deletion action, EPA will publish
a timely withdrawal of this direct final Notice of Partial Deletion
before the effective date of the partial deletion and the partial
deletion will not take effect. EPA, will as appropriate, prepare a
response to comments and continue with the deletion process on the
basis of the Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion and the comments
already received. There will be no additional opportunity to comment.
    Section II of this document explains the criteria for deleting
sites from the NPL. Section III discusses procedures that EPA is using
for this action. Section IV discusses the soils of Operable Unit 1 and
the underlying ground water of the approximately 8-acre western portion
of Operable Unit 1 of the Many Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund
Site and demonstrates how it meets the deletion criteria. Section V
discusses EPA's action to partially delete the Site parcels from the
NPL unless adverse comments are received during the public comment
period.

II. NPL Deletion Criteria

    The NCP establishes the criteria that EPA uses to delete sites from
the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR 300.425(e), EPA will consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any of the following criteria have
been met:
    i. Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required;
    ii. All appropriate Fund-financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
    iii. The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
the taking of remedial measures is not appropriate.
    Pursuant to CERCLA section 121(c) and the NCP, EPA conducts five-
year reviews to ensure the continued protectiveness of remedial actions
where hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain at a
site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure. EPA conducts such five-year reviews even if a site is deleted
from the NPL. The soils of Operable Unit 1 and the underlying ground
water of the approximately 8-acre western portion of Operable Unit 1 of
the Many Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund Site will not require
five-year reviews. EPA may initiate further action to ensure continued
protectiveness at a deleted site if new information becomes available
that indicates it is appropriate. Whenever there is a significant
release from a site deleted from the NPL, the deleted site may be
restored to the NPL without application of the hazard ranking system.

III. Partial Deletion Procedures

    The following procedures apply to the deletion of the soils of
Operable Unit 1 and the underlying ground water of the approximately 8-
acre western portion of Operable Unit 1 of the Many Diversified
Interests, Inc. Superfund Site:
    1. EPA has consulted with the state of Texas prior to developing
this direct final Notice of Partial Deletion and the Notice of Intent
for Partial Deletion co-published in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of
the Federal Register.
    2. EPA has provided the state 30 working days for review of this
notice and the parallel Notice of Intent for

Partial Deletion prior to their publication today, and the state,
through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, has concurred on
this partial deletion of the Site from the NPL.
    3. Concurrently with the publication of this direct final Notice of
Partial Deletion, a notice of the availability of the parallel Notice
of Intent for Partial Deletion is being published in a major local
newspaper, the Houston Chronicle. The newspaper announces the 30-day
public comment period concerning the Notice of Intent for Partial
Deletion of the Site from the NPL.
    4. The EPA placed copies of documents supporting the partial
deletion in the deletion docket and made these items available for
public inspection and copying at the Site information repositories
identified above.
    5. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day public
comment period on this partial deletion action, EPA will publish a
timely notice of withdrawal of this direct final Notice of Partial
Deletion before its effective date and will prepare a response to
comments and continue with the deletion process on the basis of the
Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion and the comments already
received.
    Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not itself
create, alter, or revoke any individual's rights or obligations.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not in any way alter
EPA's right to take enforcement actions, as appropriate. The NPL is
designed primarily for informational purposes and to assist EPA
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP states that the deletion
of a site from the NPL does not preclude eligibility for further
response actions, should future conditions warrant such actions.

IV. Basis for Site Partial Deletion

    The following information provides EPA's rationale for deleting the
soils of Operable Unit 1 and the underlying ground water of the
approximately 8-acre western portion of Operable Unit 1 of the Many
Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund Site from the NPL. A map of the
Site, including the aerial extent of Operable Unit 1 and the underlying
8 acres of ground water proposed for deletion, is available in the
deletion docket.

Site Location and History

    The Many Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund Site (Site, CERCLIS
ID--TXD008083404), a former foundry (Operable Unit 1), occupied a 36-
acre tract of land located at 3617 Baer Street in Houston, Texas
(Harris County). The Site also consists of the residential areas (off-
site soils of Operable Units 2 and 3) surrounding the former foundry.
Figures, with coordinates, of the areas to be deleted will be made
available at the Site information repositories and included with the
deletion docket. The Site is located approximately two miles east of
downtown Houston and one block south of Interstate Highway 10 in an
area of mixed industrial and residential land use. This part of Houston
is known as the ``Fifth Ward.'' The Site is bordered by Hare Street to
the north, National Vinegar Company and Press Street to the east, the
former Texas & New Orleans railroad right-of-way to the south, and
Bringhurst Street to the west. Operable Units 2 and 3 include the
residential yards and ``high access areas'' (e.g., schools, day care
centers, playgrounds, churches, etc.) surrounding the former foundry.
    Operations at the metal casting foundry began in 1926. The facility
primarily manufactured specialty molded parts such as large wheels,
tracks, and mining equipment. The process area consisted of two casting
plants. Various grades of steel, including high carbon, chrome,
molybdenum, high nickel, and stainless steel were cast at the facility.
Scrap metal and iron were melted in the carbon arc furnaces, tested,
corrected for the elements needed for the different grades of steel,
and poured into molds. Molds and cores were constructed by mixing sand
with flour binders. Castings were cleaned (by mechanical grinding, shot
blasting, or sandblasting) and heat-treated. Final machining was
performed either at the site or the customer's shop, if needed.
    During the mid-1980s, the southern portion of the Site was leased
to Can-Am Resource Group (Can-Am). Can-Am conducted a spent catalyst
recycling operation using an experimental process. Catalyst is a
substance that speeds up a chemical reaction to create a desirable
product, such as gasoline for vehicles or other usable products. Can-Am
reportedly obtained several thousand drums of spent catalyst from
chemical plants and refineries located along the Houston Ship Channel
and stored them at the Site.

Site Conditions Resulting in Listing

    The EPA believes that the air emissions from the operations of the
former foundry, which contained particles of lead, may have caused the
on-site (Operable Unit 1) and off-site (Operable Units 2 and 3) soils
to become contaminated through the air deposition of these particles.
Foundry practices may have also contributed to the on-site lead
contamination of the soils. Other probable sources of lead
contamination that may have impacted the on- and off-site soils may
include lead-based paint and historical deposition from vehicular lead-
based fuel emissions, among other possible sources. The leaking drums
of spent catalyst from chemical plants and refineries, stored at the
Site by Can-Am, also caused the soils to become contaminated, posing a
threat to the residential areas of the Site.

Operable Units

    The EPA organized the Site into Operable Units 1 (On-Site Soils and
Ground Water), 2 (Off-Site Residential Yards and High Access Areas),
and 3 (Residential Crawlspaces and Those Residential Areas Not
Addressed Under Operable Unit 2) as discrete actions that address the
distinct geographical portions and the different media (on-site soils
and ground water, and off-site residential yard and crawlspace soils)
affected by the Site. The soils of Operable Unit 1 and the underlying
ground water of the approximately 8-acre western portion of Operable
Unit 1 are the subject of this direct notice for partial deletion.

Operable Unit 1 (On-Site Soils and Ground Water)

    Operable Unit 1 (On-Site Soils and Ground Water) consists of the
soils and ground water within the fenced boundaries of the former
foundry.
    In September 1998, EPA issued an action memorandum to address the
removal of approximately 5,355 deteriorating drums of waste from the
Site and 100,000 yd\3\ of contaminated on-site soils. In May 1999, EPA
issued unilateral administrative orders directing the potentially
responsible parties to conduct a removal action to address the drummed
wastes at the Site.
    The Proposed Plan for Operable Unit 1 was made available for public
comment on February 1, 2004. The Record of Decision for Operable Unit
1, which identified the Selected Remedy for Operable Unit 1, was issued
on July 30, 2004. In September 2006, EPA and Clinton Gregg Investments,
Ltd. (CGI) entered into an ``Agreed Order on Consent and Covenant Not
to Sue.'' This is the first-ever agreement in the nation by a non-
liable party to clean up a Superfund Site. The purchaser of the former
foundry property (Operable Unit 1) agreed to implement and fund the
Selected Remedy. Partial deletion of the soils of Operable Unit 1 and
the underlying ground water of the

approximately 8-acre western portion of Operable Unit 1 of the Site was
requested by CGI to facilitate the residential development of the Site.

Operable Unit 2 (Off-Site Residential Yards and High Access Areas)

    Operable Unit 2 (Off-Site Residential Yards and High Access Areas)
consists of the residential yards and high access areas surrounding the
fenced boundaries of the former foundry (Operable Unit 1). In 1998, the
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (now the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality) performed a removal action that
addressed 89 residential yards, contaminated with lead, in the vicinity
of the Site. In November 2003 and June 2005, EPA completed removal
actions at 59 residential yards and high access areas, which included
the Blanche Kelso Bruce Elementary School, Fifth Ward Multi-Service
Center, and several churches. The purpose of these removal actions was
to remove surface soil with concentrations of lead that equaled or
exceeded the cleanup goal of 500 mg/kg to reduce the exposure of
children and adults to lead. EPA believes that these removal actions
addressed all of the residential yards and High Access Areas that could
have been affected by the air emissions of particulates containing lead
from the former foundry and for which access was granted for sampling.
    The ground water medium was not a component of the investigation
for Operable Unit 2. The Proposed Plan for Operable Unit 2 was made
available for public comment on July 28, 2005. The Record of Decision
for Operable Unit 2, which identified the Selected Remedy for Operable
Unit 2, was issued on September 23, 2005. The Selected Remedy for
Operable Unit 2 was ``no further action'' since the previous removal
actions eliminated the existing and potential risks to human health and
the environment so that no further action was necessary. Operable Unit
2 is not being considered for partial deletion at this time and is not
discussed further in this direct notice of partial deletion.

Operable Unit 3 (Residential Crawlspaces and Those Residential Areas
Not Addressed Under Operable Unit 2)

    Operable Unit 3 (Off-Site Residential Crawlspaces and Those
Residential Areas Not Addressed Under Operable Unit 2) consists of the
residential crawlspaces and yards surrounding the fenced boundaries of
the former foundry (Operable Unit 1) which were not addressed under
Operable Unit 2 because the owners could not be located, or they were
not responsive to the EPA's request for sampling, or they denied the
EPA access for sampling.
    In April 2006 and 2009, the EPA completed removal actions at the
northeastern portion of the Kelly Village Housing Complex and six (6)
additional residential yards of the Site, respectively. The purpose of
these removal actions was to remove surface soil with concentrations of
lead that equaled or exceeded the cleanup goal of 500 mg/kg to reduce
the exposure of children and adults to lead. EPA believes that these
removal actions addressed all of the Kelly Village areas and
surrounding residential yards which could have been affected by the air
emissions of particulates containing lead from the former foundry and
for which the EPA was granted access for sampling.
    The ground water medium was not a component of the investigation
for Operable Unit 3. The Proposed Plan for Operable Unit 3 was made
available for public comment in June 2009. The Record of Decision for
Operable Unit 3, which identified the Selected Remedy for Operable Unit
3, was issued on August 31, 2009. The Selected Remedy for Operable Unit
3 crawlspaces was ``no action warranted'' since the Baseline Human
Health Risk Assessment concluded that current or potential future Site
conditions pose no unacceptable risks to human health or to the
environment so that no action is warranted. The Selected Remedy
Operable Unit 3 residential yards was ``no further action'' since the
previous removal actions eliminated the existing and potential risks to
human health and the environment so that no further action was
necessary. Operable Unit 3 is not being considered for partial deletion
at this time and is not discussed further in this direct notice of
partial deletion.

Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study for Operable Unit 1

    The remedial investigation for Operable Unit 1 addressed the
following key issues in order to determine the nature and extent of
contamination at the Site:
     Determine the distribution of metal concentrations in
near-surface soils (specifically lead deposited as a result of air
dispersion and deposition of emissions from the former foundry),
     Determine the nature and extent of contaminants of
potential concern in soils associated with the historic foundry
operations at the Site, and
     Determine the nature and extent of contamination in ground
water at the Site (Operable Unit 1).
    The contaminant found above risk-based levels in the soils included
lead. The contaminants found above risk-based levels in the ground
water included benzo(a)pyrene, total petroleum hydrocarbons, manganese,
and molybdenum. A total of five alternatives were developed for the
Site during the feasibility study for Operable Unit 1. The EPA chose
stabilization/solidification of lead-contaminated soils with off-site
disposal, source removal and monitored natural attenuation for the
ground water, and the placement of institutional controls for both the
soils and ground water as the Selected Remedy for the Site.

Selected Remedy for Operable Unit 1

    The major components of the Selected Remedy described in the Record
of Decision for Operable Unit 1 (On-Site Soils and Ground Water) for
the Site consisted of:
     Excavation and Treatment (solidification/stabilization, if
necessary) of approximately 13,600 cubic yards (yd\3\) of soils with
lead concentrations equal to or greater than 500 milligrams per
kilogram (mg/kg) to a maximum depth of 1.5 feet below ground surface
(bgs), and approximately 3,000 yd\3\ of soils stockpiled at the Site
from a previous removal action were also treated, if necessary.
Transportation and Disposal (at a permitted off-site waste disposal
facility) of the treated and untreated soils;
     Transportation and Disposal (at a permitted off-site waste
disposal facility) of approximately 31,621 yd\3\ of debris
(nonhazardous debris, foundry sand, and slag), the Asbestos-Containing
Material in the on-site building and scattered throughout the Site, and
an Underground Storage Tank in the vicinity of Monitoring Well (MW) 20;
     Excavation and Disposal (at a permitted off-site waste
disposal facility) of approximately 2,100 yd\3\ of soils contaminated
with benzo(a)pyrene, or other organics, at the MW-3 location; light
nonaqueous-phase liquids at the MW-11 location; and Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons at the MW-20 location. Soil cleanup levels for these
isolated source areas were determined during the remedial design and
remedial action for the Selected Remedy;
     Implementation of Monitored Natural Attenuation for the
ground water, which included source removal and Long-Term Monitoring
for the ground water to ensure that constituents (total petroleum
hydrocarbons and benzo[a]pyrene) above cleanup goals are naturally
attenuating; and
     Implementation of Institutional Controls for both the
soils and ground

water to prevent exposure to soil contamination above acceptable
cleanup levels and to prevent exposure to contaminated ground water in
the shallow water-bearing zone.

Remedial Action Objectives for Operable Unit 1

    The Remedial Action Objectives accomplished for Operable Unit 1 of
the Site were:
     Remove the asbestos-containing material stockpiled on the
Site and left in the existing building,
     Reduce the risk posed to residential receptors by lead
concentrations in the soils equal to or greater than the cleanup goal
for the Site (500 mg/kg),
     Remove soil visibly contaminated with waste oil in the
vicinity of MW-3 and MW-20 that was acting as a potential continuing
source of ground water contamination,
     Remove soil visibly contaminated with waste oil in the
vicinity of MW-11 that has the potential to act as a source of ground
water contamination,
     Remediate ground water in the northwest corner of the
Site, at MW-20, and remove the free product associated with an
underground storage tank, and
     Mitigate the threat posed by exposure to ground water
throughout the rest of the Site.

The basis for the Remedial Action Objectives for the Operable Unit 1
soil was to cleanup the Site to residential standards, the anticipated
future land use for the fenced boundaries of the Site. The basis for
the Remedial Action Objectives for the ground water was to ensure that
current and future receptors are not exposed to contaminated ground
water during the implementation of the Selected Remedy.

Response Actions for Operable Unit 1

    The remedial design for Operable Unit 1 included the following
design determinations:
     Defining the lead removal and sampling techniques
(including confirmation sampling);
     Detailing a lead-impacted soil treatment process;
     Determining source removal criteria for light nonaqueous
phase liquid-impacted areas,
     Defining the disposal/sampling needs for each waste
stream, and
     Defining the monitoring wells for the monitored natural
attenuation program.
    The remedial action for Operable Unit 1 included:
     Demolition and disposal of an abandoned 2-story office
building, and several 1-story utility structures;
     Transportation and disposal of the asbestos-containing
material in the on-site building and scattered throughout the Site;
     Transportation and disposal (at a permitted off-site waste
disposal facility) of approximately 31,621 yd\3\ of debris (non-
hazardous debris, foundry sand, and slag) and the asbestos-containing
material in the on-site building and scattered throughout the Site;
     Removal and disposal of an electrical transformer, and
underground storage tank in the vicinity of MW-20 and Lead Area 1, and
the management and disposal of foundry bag filters identified as a
listed K061 waste material;
     Excavation and treatment (solidification/stabilization, if
necessary) of approximately 13,600 yd\3\ of soils with lead
concentrations equal to or greater than 500 mg/kg to a maximum depth of
1.5 feet bgs and approximately 3,000 yd\3\ of soils stockpiled at the
Site from a previous removal action, and transportation and disposal
(at a permitted off-site wastes disposal facility) of the treated and
untreated soils;
     Excavation and disposal (at a permitted off-site waste
disposal facility) of approximately 2,100 yd\3\ of soils contaminated
with benzo(a)pyrene, or other organics, at the MW-11 location, and
total petroleum hydrocarbons at the MW-20 location;
     Confirmation sampling for several locations identified to
have been impacted by either semi-volatile organic compounds or
polychlorinated biphenyls in the soils; and lead confirmation sampling
for the Site soils;
     Installation of additional monitoring wells to be utilized
during the monitored natural attenuation program.

Cleanup Goals for Operable Unit 1

    Soil remedial action activities were conducted at Operable Unit 1
from May 2007 through June 2008. The soil remedial action for Operable
Unit 1 of the Site consisted of the sampling and excavation, including
the proper disposal, of the soils contaminated with lead equal to or
greater than the 500 mg/kg residential soil lead cleanup level
specified in the Record of Decision for Operable Unit 1. The soil
remedial action also consisted of the sampling and excavation of soils
contaminated with total petroleum hydrocarbons and other organics
identified in the Record of Decision for Operable Unit 1. Confirmation
sampling was also conducted to verify that this area did not contain
soil with lead or organic concentrations (total petroleum hydrocarbons,
benzo(a)pyrene, and polychlorinated biphenyls) equal to or greater than
the cleanup level. Institutional controls were not required for the
soils since sampling indicated that soil lead concentrations did not
exceed the cleanup level below 1.5 feet bgs. Sampling data gathered
from the ground water monitoring wells located in the approximately 8-
acre western portion of Operable Unit 1 indicated that the underlying
ground water had not been impacted by the hazardous substances
identified in the Selected Remedy for Operable Unit 1 of the Site. The
ground water flows to the east southeast at this portion of the Site
and the contaminants are not expected to contaminate the ground water
underlying the 8-acre western portion of the Site. Therefore, EPA
determined that the ground water underlying the approximately 8-acre
western portion of Operable Unit 1 would not require institutional
controls.
    The EPA conducted pre-final and final construction inspections for
Operable Unit 1 on June 25, 2008, and determined that CGI completed the
Selected Remedy for Operable Unit 1 in accordance with the remedial
design plans and specifications, the remedial action sampling and
analysis plan, the Record of Decision for Operable Unit 1, and the
Agreed Order on Consent. The EPA approved the ``Final Soil Remedial
Action Report'' (dated 08/29/08) on December 12, 2008, and issued a
final certification of completion of the soil remedial action on August
19, 2009.
    Since all the contaminants were remediated in the Operable Unit 1
soils, and monitoring data indicated that the ground water underlying
the 8-acre western portion of the Site was not contaminated, no
operation and maintenance, monitoring, or five-year reviews are
required.

Community Involvement

    Public participation activities have been satisfied as required in
CERCLA Section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k) and CERCLA Section 117, 42
U.S.C. 9617. Documents in the partial deletion docket which the EPA
relied on for recommendation for the partial deletion from the NPL are
available to the public in the information repositories, and a notice
of availability of the Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion has been
published in the Houston Chronicle to satisfy public participation
procedures required by 40 CFR 300.425(e)(4).

Determination That the Criteria for Deletion Have Been Met

    In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is

appropriate. The EPA, in consultation with the State of Texas (through
the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality), has determined that the
potentially responsible parties have completed the removal action for
Operable Unit 1 according to the May 1999 ``Unilateral Administrative
Order,'' and that Clinton Gregg Investments, Ltd. has completed the
soil remedial action for Operable Unit 1 according to the July 2004
``Record of Decision'' and the September 2006 ``Agreed Order on Consent
and Covenant Not to Sue.'' Additionally, EPA completed the removal
action at Operable Unit 1 according to the September 1998 ``Action
Memorandum.''

V. Partial Deletion Action

    The EPA, with concurrence of the State of Texas, through the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality, has determined that all
appropriate response actions under CERCLA have been completed.
Therefore, EPA is deleting the soils of Operable Unit 1 and the
underlying ground water of the approximately 8-acre western portion of
Operable Unit 1 of the Many Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund Site
from the NPL.
    Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, EPA is taking it without prior publication. This action will
be effective August 16, 2010 unless EPA receives adverse comments by
July 15, 2010. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day
public comment period, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final notice of partial deletion before the effective date of
the partial deletion and it will not take effect. EPA will prepare a
response to comments and continue with the deletion process on the
basis of the notice of intent to partially delete and the comments
already received. There will be no additional opportunity to comment.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.

    Dated: June 4, 2010.
Lawerence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.

0
For the reasons set out in this document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended as
follows:

PART 300--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923; 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.

Appendix B--[Amended]

0
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300 is amended by revising the entry
under ``Many Diversified Interests, Inc., Texas'' to read as follows:

Appendix B to Part 300--National Priorities List

                                       Table 1--General Superfund Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            State                        Site name                     City/county                Notes (a)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
TX...........................  Many Diversified Interests,    Houston......................  P
                                Inc.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) * * *
* P = Sites with partial deletion(s).

[FR Doc. 2010-14232 Filed 6-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 90 (Friday, May 8, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27334-27337]
[FR Doc No: 2020-09822]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0396; Airspace Docket No. 20-AGL-21]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of Class D and Class E Airspace, Revocation of
Class E Airspace, and Establishment of Class E Airspace; Multiple Ohio
Towns

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend the Class D airspace and Class E
surface airspace at Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton, OH, and Wilmington
Air Park, Wilmington, OH; revoke the Class E airspace designated as an
extension to Class D and Class E surface area at Wilmington Air Park;
and amend the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface at Dayton-Phillipsburg Airport, Dayton, OH; Dayton-Wright
Brothers Airport, Dayton, OH; Greene County-Lewis A. Jackson Regional
Airport, Dayton, OH; James M. Cox Dayton International Airport, Dayton,
OH; Wright-Patterson AFB; Grimes Field, Urbana, OH; and Wilmington Air
Park; and establish Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport,
Springfield, OH. The FAA is proposing this action as the result of
airspace reviews caused by the decommissioning of the Springfield VHF
omnidirectional range (VOR) navigation aid, which provided navigation
information for the instrument procedures these airports, as part of
the VOR Minimum Operational Network (MON) Program, and the
decommissioning of the Springfield localizer and glideslope which
provided navigation information for the instrument procedures at
Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport. The names of Dayton-Phillipsburg
Airport, Dayton-Wright Brothers Airport, and Greene County-Lewis A.
Jackson Regional Airport, and the geographic coordinates of Wright
Patterson AFB, Dayton-Wright Brothers Airport, Greene County-Lewis A.
Jackson Regional Airport, and Grimes Field would also be updated to
coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 22, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone
(202) 366-9826, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2020-0396/Airspace Docket No. 20-AGL-21, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at https://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
    FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11D at NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the

agency's authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the
use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would amend the Class D airspace and Class E surface
airspace at Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton, OH, and Wilmington Air Park,
Wilmington, OH; revoke the Class E airspace designated as an extension
to Class D and Class E surface area at Wilmington Air Park; and amend
the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
at Dayton-Phillipsburg Airport, Dayton, OH; Dayton-Wright Brothers
Airport, Dayton, OH; Greene County-Lewis A. Jackson Regional Airport,
Dayton, OH; James M. Cox Dayton International Airport, Dayton, OH;
Wright-Patterson AFB; Grimes Field, Urbana, OH; and Wilmington Air
Park; and establish Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport,
Springfield, OH, to support instrument flight rule operations at these
airports.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2020-0396/
Airspace Docket No. 20-AGL-21.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Federal Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and effective
September 15, 2019. FAA Order 7400.11D is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11D lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by:
    Amending the Class D airspace at Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton, OH,
by removing the Patterson VORTAC and the associated extension as they
are no longer required; adding an extension 1.2 miles each side of the
046[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 4.6-mile radius to
5.2 miles northeast of the airport; adding an extension 1.2 miles each
side of the 228[deg] bearing form the airport extending from the 4.6-
mile radius to 4.8 miles southwest of the airport; updating the header
of the airspace legal description to Dayton, OH, (previously Dayton,
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH) to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical
database; removing the city name associated with the airport to comply
with changes to FAA Order 7400.2M, Procedures for Handling Airspace
Matters; and replacing the outdated term ``Airport/Facility Directory''
with ``Chart Supplement;''
    Amending the Class D airspace to within a 4.5-mile (increased from
a 4.2-mile) radius of Wilmington Air Park, Wilmington, OH; removing the
cities associated with the airports in the airspace legal description
to comply with changes to FAA Order 7400.2M; and replacing the outdated
term ``Airport/Facility Directory'' with ``Chart Supplement;''
    Amending the Class E surface airspace at Wright-Patterson AFB,
Dayton, OH, by removing the Patterson VORTAC and the associated
extension as they are no longer required; adding an extension 1.2 miles
each side of the 046[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the
4.6-mile radius to 5.2 miles northeast of the airport; adding an
extension 1.2 miles each side of the 228[deg] bearing form the airport
extending from the 4.6-mile radius to 4.8 miles southwest of the
airport; updating the header of the airspace legal description to
Dayton, OH, (previously Dayton, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH) to coincide
with the FAA's aeronautical database; removing the city name associated
with the airport to comply with changes to FAA Order 7400.2M; and
replacing the outdated term ``Airport/Facility Directory'' with ``Chart
Supplement;''
    Amending the Class E surface airspace to within a 4.5-mile
(increased from a 4.2-mile) radius of Wilmington Air Park, Wilmington,
OH; removing the extensions southwest and northeast of the airport as
they are no longer needed; removing the cities associated with the
airports in the airspace legal description to comply with changes to
FAA Order 7400.2M; and replacing the outdated term ``Airport/Facility
Directory'' with ``Chart Supplement;''
    Removing the Class E airspace designated as an extension to Class D
and Class E surface areas at Wilmington Air Park, Wilmington, OH, as it
is no longer needed;
    Amending the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface at Dayton-Phillipsburg Airport (previously Phillipsburg
Airport), Dayton, OH by updating the name of the airport to coincide
with the FAA's aeronautical database; updating the header of the
airspace legal description to Dayton, OH, (previously Phillipsburg, OH)
to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database; and removing the
exclusionary language as it is no longer required;
    Amending the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface to within a 6.5-mile (decreased from a 6.6-mile) radius at
Dayton-Wright Brothers Airport,

Dayton, OH; removing the extension northeast of the airport associated
with the Runway 20 Localizer as it is no longer required; removing the
exclusionary language as it is no longer required; adding an extension
within 1.6 miles each side of the 261[deg] bearing from the Onida NDB
extending from the 6.5-mile radius of the airport to 9.1 miles west of
the airport; and updating the name and the geographic coordinates of
Dayton-Wright Brothers Airport (previously Dayton General Airport
South) to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database;
    Amending the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface to within a 6.5-mile (increased from a 6.3-mile) radius at
Greene County-Lewis A. Jackson Regional Airport, Dayton, OH; removing
the extension northeast of the airport as it is no longer needed;
adding an extension within 1 mile each side of the 243[deg] bearing
from the airport extending from the 6.5-mile radius to 8.1 miles
southwest of the airport; removing the exclusionary language as it is
no longer required; updating the header of the airspace legal
description to Dayton, OH, (previously Dayton, Greene County Airport,
OH) to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database; removing the city
associated with the airport to comply with changes to FAA Order
7400.2M; and updating the name and geographic coordinates of the Greene
County-Lewis A. Jackson Regional Airport (previously Greene County
Airport) to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database;
    Amending the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface at Dayton, OH, by removing the bounded area of ``. . .
bounded by a line beginning at lat. 39[deg]59'00'' N, long.
83[deg]40'00'' W; to lat 39[deg]55'00'' N, long. 83[deg]37'00'' W; to
lat. 39[deg]45'00'' N, long. 83[deg]43'00'' W; to lat. 39[deg]39'00''
N, long. 84[deg]07'00'' W; to lat. 39[deg]45'00'' N, long.
84[deg]24'00'' W; to lat. 39[deg]49'00'' N, long. 84[deg]27'00'' W; to
lat. 40[deg]04'06'' N, long. 84[deg]17'45'' W; to the point of
beginning'' and replacing it as follows: within a 7.5-mile radius of
James M. Cox Dayton International Airport, Dayton, OH; and within 3
miles each side of the 235[deg] bearing from James M. Cox Dayton
International Airport: RWY 24R-LOC extending from the 7.5-mile radius
of James M. Cox Dayton International Airport to 13.2 miles southwest of
the James M. Cox Dayton International Airport: RWY 24R-LOC; and within
a 7.1-mile radius of Wright Patterson-AFB, Dayton, OH;
    Establishing Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface within a 6.9-mile radius of Springfield-Beckley Municipal
Airport, Springfield, OH (This airspace was previously covered by the
Dayton, OH, Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface, but the airspace legal descriptions are being separated to
comply with FAA Order 7400.2M and the FAA's aeronautical database.);
and within 4 miles each side of the 056[deg] bearing from the Clark
County NDB extending from the 6.9-mile radius of the airport to 10.7
miles northeast of the Clark County NDB;
    Amending the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface within a 6.5-mile (decreased from an 8.2-mile) radius of
Grimes Field, Urbana, OH; removing the city associated with the airport
to comply with changes to FAA Order 7400.2M; updating the geographic
coordinates of the airport to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical
database; and removing the exclusionary language as it is no longer
needed;
    And amending the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Wilmington Air Park by removing the Midwest VOR/
DME and associated extensions from the airspace legal description as
they are no longer needed; and adding an extension within 4 miles each
side of the 037[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 7-mile
radius to 10.3 miles northeast of the airport; and removing the city
associated with the airport to comply with changes to FAA Order
7400.2M.
    This action is the result of airspace reviews caused by the
decommissioning of the Springfield VOR, which provided navigation
information for the instrument procedures at these airports, as part of
the VOR MON Program, and the decommissioning of the Springfield
localizer and glideslope which provided navigation information for the
instrument procedures at Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport.
    Class D and E airspace designations are published in paragraph
5000, 6002, 6004, and 6005, respectively of FAA Order 7400.11D, dated
August 8, 2019, and effective September 15, 2019, which is incorporated
by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and E airspace designations
listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and
effective September 15, 2019, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

AGL OH D Dayton, OH [Amended]

Wright-Patterson AFB, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]49'33'' N, long. 84[deg]02'46'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,400 feet MSL within a 4.6-mile radius of Wright-Patterson AFB, and
within 1.2 miles each side of the 046[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the 4.6-mile radius to 5.2 miles northeast of the
airport, and within 1.2 miles each side of the 228[deg] bearing from
the airport extending

from the 4.6-mile radius to 4.8 miles southwest of the airport
excluding that airspace within the Dayton, James M. Cox-Dayton
International Airport, OH, Class C airspace area. This Class D
airspace area is effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by Notice to Airmen. The effective date and
time will thereafter be continuously published in the Chart
Supplement.
* * * * *

AGL OH D Wilmington, OH [Amended]

Wilmington Air Park, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]25'41'' N, long. 083[deg]47'32'' W)
Hollister Field Airport, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]26'15'' N, long. 083[deg]42'30'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,600 feet MSL within a 4.5-mile radius of the Wilmington Air Park,
excluding that portion of airspace within a 1-mile radius of
Hollister Field Airport. This Class D airspace area is effective
during the specific dates and times established in advance by a
Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as a Surface Area.

* * * * *

AGL OH E2 Dayton, OH [Amended]

Wright-Patterson AFB, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]49'33'' N, long. 84[deg]02'46'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,400 feet MSL within a 4.6-mile radius of Wright-Patterson AFB, and
within 1.2 miles each side of the 046[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the 4.6-mile radius to 5.2 miles northeast of the
airport, and within 1.2 miles each side of the 228[deg] bearing from
the airport extending from the 4.6-mile radius to 4.8 miles
southwest of the airport excluding that airspace within the Dayton,
James M. Cox-Dayton International Airport, OH, Class C airspace
area. This Class E airspace area is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by Notice to Airmen. The
effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in
the Chart Supplement.
* * * * *

AGL OH E2 Wilmington, OH [Amended]

Wilmington Air Park, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]25'41'' N, long. 083[deg]47'32'' W)
Hollister Field Airport, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]26'15'' N, long. 083[deg]42'30'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,600 feet MSL within a 4.5-mile radius of the Wilmington Air Park,
excluding that portion of airspace within a 1-mile radius of
Hollister Field Airport. This Class E airspace area is effective
during the specific dates and times established in advance by a
Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to
a Class D or Class E Surface Area.

* * * * *

AGL OH E4 Wilmington, OH [Removed]

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AGL OH E5 Dayton, OH [Amended]

Dayton-Phillipsburg Airport, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]54'48'' N, long. 84[deg]24'01'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.2-mile radius of the Dayton-Phillipsburg Airport.

AGL OH E5 Dayton, OH [Amended]

Dayton-Wright Brothers Airport, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]35'20'' N, long. 84[deg]13'30'' W)
Onida NDB
    (Lat. 39[deg]34'41'' N, long. 84[deg]19'24'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of the Dayton-Wright Brothers Airport, and
within 1.6 miles each side of the 261[deg] bearing from the Onida
NDB extending from the 6.5-mile radius of the airport to 9.1 miles
west of the airport.

AGL OH E5 Dayton, OH [Amended]

Greene County-Lewis A. Jackson Regional Airport, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]41'27'' N, long. 83[deg]59'34'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of the Greene County-Lewis A. Jackson
Regional Airport, and within 1 mile either side of the 243[deg]
bearing from the airport extending from the 6.5-mile radius to 8.1
miles southwest of the airport.

AGL OH E5 Dayton, OH [Amended]

James M. Cox Dayton International Airport, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]54'08'' N, long. 84[deg]13'10'' W)
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]49'33'' N, long. 84[deg]02'46'' W)
James M. Cox Dayton International Airport: RWY 24R-LOC
    (Lat. 39[deg]53'37'' N, long. 84[deg]14'57'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7.5-mile radius of James M. Cox Dayton International
Airport, and within 3 miles each side of the 235[deg] bearing from
the James M. Cox Dayton International Airport: RWY 24R-LOC extending
from the 7.5-mile radius of James M. Cox Dayton International
Airport to 13.2 miles southwest of the James M. Cox Dayton
International Airport: RWY 24R-LOC, and within a 7.1-mile radius of
Wright Patterson AFB.
* * * * *

AGL OH E5 Springfield, OH [Establish]

Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]50'25'' N, long. 83[deg]50'25'' W)
Clark County NDB
    (Lat. 39[deg]52'25'' N, long. 83[deg]46'46'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.9-mile radius of Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport,
and within 4 miles each side of the 056[deg] bearing from the Clark
County NDB extending from the 6.9-mile radius of the Springfield-
Beckley Municipal Airport to 10.7 miles from the Clark County NDB.
* * * * *

AGL OH E5 Urbana, OH [Amended]

Grimes Field, OH
    (Lat. 40[deg]07'57'' N, long. 83[deg]45'15'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of Grimes Field.
* * * * *

AGL OH E5 Wilmington, OH [Amended]

Wilmington Air Park, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]25'41'' N, long. 083[deg]47'32'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7-mile radius of Wilmington Air Park, and within 4 miles
each side of the 037[deg] bearing from the airport extending from
the 7-mile radius to 10.3 miles northeast of the airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 4, 2020.
Steven T. Phillips,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2020-09822 Filed 5-7-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 24 (Monday, February 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7719-7720]
[FR Doc No: 2023-02415]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 9685-037]

Ampersand Cranberry Lake Hydro, LLC; Notice of Application for
Surrender of License, Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Application for surrender of license.
    b. Project No: P-9685-037.
    c. Date Filed: December 7, 2022.
    d. Applicant: Ampersand Cranberry Lake Hydro, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Cranberry Lake Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The project is located on Oswegatchie River, in St.
Lawrence County, New York.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a--825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Sayad Moudachirou, Ampersand Cranberry
Lake Hydro, LLC. 717 Atlantic Avenue Suite 1a, Boston, Massachusetts
02111,<PHONE_NUMBER>, [email protected].
    i. FERC Contact: Jon Cofrancesco,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].
    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and
protests: March 2, 2023.

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, motions to intervene, and protests using the Commission's
eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.
Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without
prior registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact
information at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at [email protected],<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll
free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, you may
submit a paper copy. Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service must
be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.
Submissions sent via any other carrier must be addressed to: Kimberly
D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins
Avenue, Rockville, MD 20852. The first page of any filing should
include the docket number P-9685-037. Comments emailed to Commission
staff are not considered part of the Commission record.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person whose name appears on the official service
list for the project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or
documents with the Commission relating to the merits of an issue that
may affect the responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they
must also serve a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Request: Ampersand Cranberry Lake Hydro
(Ampersand) proposes surrendering its license for the non-operating
project. The project dam and other project facilities are owned by the
Oswegatchie River-Cranberry Regulating District (Regulating District),
a local governmental entity. Ampersand lost its lease to the project,
along with all rights and access to the project. Ampersand is not
proposing any ground disturbing activities as part of the surrender.
Ampersand proposes to adopt the Regulating District's plan to, at the
Regulating District's own expense, remove the project's fuse plug
spillway, complete all needed repairs of the dam, remove the generating
and appurtenant equipment from the powerhouse, and secure the project
site. If the Commission approves the surrender and the surrender
becomes effective, Commission jurisdiction will end over the project
and the project and dam will transition to the jurisdiction of New York
State Department of Environmental Conservation.
    l. Locations of the Application: This filing may be viewed on the
Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. You may also register
online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be
notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or email
[email protected], for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. Agencies may
obtain copies of the application directly from the applicant.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214, respectively. In determining the appropriate action to take, the
Commission will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only
those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with the
Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments,
protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or before the
specified comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Documents: Any filing must (1) bear in all
capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO
INTERVENE'' as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the name of the
applicant and the project number of the application to which the filing
responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the
person commenting, protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise comply
with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, motions to intervene, or protests must set forth their
evidentiary basis. Any filing made by an intervenor must be accompanied
by proof of service on all persons listed in the service list prepared
by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR
385.2010.

    Dated: January 31, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-02415 Filed 2-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 16, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55323-55324]
[FR Doc No: 2019-22471]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2019-0001]

Notice of Maximum Amount of Assistance Under the Individuals and
Households Program

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice of the maximum amount for assistance under
the Individuals and Households Program for emergencies and major
disasters declared on or after October 1, 2019.

DATES: This adjustment applies to emergencies and major disasters
declared on or after October 1, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher B. Smith, Recovery
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 408 of the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster

Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (the Stafford Act), 42 U.S.C. 5174,
prescribes that FEMA must annually adjust the maximum amount for
assistance provided under the Individuals and Households Program (IHP).
FEMA gives notice that the maximum amount of IHP financial assistance
provided to an individual or household under section 408 of the
Stafford Act with respect to any single emergency or major disaster is
$35,500 for housing assistance and $35,500 for other needs assistance.
The increase in award amount is for any single emergency or major
disaster declared on or after October 1, 2019. In addition, in
accordance with 44 CFR 61.17(c), this increases the maximum amount of
available coverage under any Group Flood Insurance Policy (GFIP)
issued.
    FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price
Index for All Urban Consumers of 1.7 percent for the 12-month period,
which ended in August 2019. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S.
Department of Labor released the information on September 12, 2019.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.048, Federal Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared
Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and
Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to
Individuals and Households--Other Needs.

Pete Gaynor,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2019-22471 Filed 10-15-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-11-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26049-26050]
[FR Doc No: 2018-11986]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2246-065--California]

Yuba County Water Agency; Notice of Availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for the Yuba River Development Project

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission)
regulations, 18 CFR part 380, the Office of Energy Projects has
reviewed the application for license for the Yuba River Development
Project (FERC No. 2246) and has prepared a draft environmental impact
statement (EIS) for the project. The project is located on the Yuba
River, North Yuba River, Middle Yuba River, and Oregon Creek in Yuba,
Sierra, and Nevada Counties, California, and occupies 4,416.7 acres of
federal lands administered by the Forest Service and 16.1 acres
administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
    The draft EIS contains staff's evaluations of the applicant's
proposal and the alternatives for relicensing the Yuba River
Development Project. The draft EIS documents the views of governmental
agencies, non-governmental organizations, affected Indian tribes, the
public, the license applicant, and Commission staff.
    A copy of the draft EIS is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Branch, Room 2A, located at 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. The draft EIS also may be viewed on the
Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov under the eLibrary link.
Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket
number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support at [email protected],<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll
free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY).

    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    All comments must be filed by July 30, 2018.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to
6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end of your comments. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support. In lieu of electronic
filing, please send a paper copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. The
first page of any filing should include docket number P-2246-065.
    Anyone may intervene in this proceeding based on this draft EIS (18
CFR 380.10). You must file your request to intervene as specified
above.\1\ You do not need intervenor status to have your comments
considered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Interventions may also be filed electronically via the
internet in lieu of paper. See the previous discussion on filing
comments electronically.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commission staff will hold two public meetings for the purpose of
receiving comments on the draft EIS. The daytime meeting will focus on
resource agency, Indian tribes, and non-governmental organization
comments, while the evening meeting is primarily for receiving input
from the public. All interested individuals and entities will be
invited to attend one or both of the public meetings. A notice
detailing the exact date, time, and location of the public meetings
will be forthcoming.
    For further information, please contact Alan Mitchnick at (202)
502-6074 or at [email protected].

    Dated: May 30, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-11986 Filed 6-4-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 214 (Friday, November 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68343-68346]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28029]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings No. 1

November 1, 2010.

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1438-000.
    Applicants: Sabine Pipe Line LLC.
    Description: Sabine Pipe Line LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Imbalance Cash Outs to be effective 12/1/2010.

    Filed Date: 10/28/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101028-5056.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 9, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1439-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Equitrans, L.P. submits tariff filing per 154.204:
Non-Conforming & Negotiated Rate Agreement Filing to be effective 11/1/
2010.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101028-5080.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 9, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1440-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rate Agreement Filing for PSNC to
be effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101028-5100.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 9, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1441-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Negotiated Rate Filing to be effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101028-5126.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 9, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1442-000.
    Applicants: Horizon Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Horizon Pipeline Company, L.L.C. submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Negotiated Rate Filing to be effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101028-5134.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 9, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1443-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Enerquest-Trans Louisiana CR to be effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101028-5138.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 9, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1444-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Equitrans, L.P. submits tariff filing per 154.204:
Operational Purchases and Sales to be effective 11/28/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101028-5143.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 9, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1445-000.
    Applicants: Southern LNG Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
154.204: SLNG Electric Power Cost Adjustment to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5034.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1446-000.
    Applicants: Midwestern Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Midwestern Gas Transmission Company Annual Cash Out
Report for 2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5036.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1447-000.
    Applicants: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation.
    Description: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation submits tariff
filing per 154.203: IG Rate--November 2010 to be effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1448-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: HK-Texla Capacity Release to be effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5079.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1449-000.
    Applicants: Freebird Gas Storage, L.L.C.
    Description: Freebird Gas Storage, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
154.203: Freebird Gas Storage Order No. 587-U Compliance Filing to be
effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5105.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1450-000.
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC.
    Description: Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rate 2010-10-29 Concord to be
effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5109.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1451-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company.
    Description: El Paso Natural Gas Company submits tariff filing per
154.204: Re-Designation Update to be effective 11/29/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5113.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1452-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Negotiated Rate Agreement 11-1-2010--J Aron to be
effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5115.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1453-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Negotiated Rate Agreements 11-1-2010--BG Energy to be
effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5116.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1454-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Negotiated Rate Agreement 11-1-2010--BP Energy to be
effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5117.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1455-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Negotiated Rate Agreement 11-1-2010--Emera to be effective
11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5119.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1456-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing

per 154.204: Negotiated Rate Agreement 11-1-2010--Hess to be effective
11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5121.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1457-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Negotiated Rate Agreement 11-1-2010--Tenaska to be
effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5122.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1458-000.
    Applicants: MarkWest Pioneer, L.L.C.
    Description: MarkWest Pioneer, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
154.403(d)(2): Interim Fuel Adjustment Filing to be effective 11/1/
2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5126.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1459-000.
    Applicants: Midwestern Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Midwestern Gas Transmission Company submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Non Conforming Agreement--Chevron to be effective
11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5133.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1460-000.
    Applicants: Trunkline Gas Company, LLC.
    Description: Trunkline Gas Company, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.203: Annual Interruptible Storage Rev. Credit Surcharge Adjustment
to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5163.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1461-000.
    Applicants: Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C. submits tariff
filing per 154.403(d)(2): Quarterly FL&U Filing to be effective 12/1/
2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5169.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1462-000.
    Applicants: Trunkline Gas Company, LLC.
    Description: Trunkline Gas Company, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Negotiated Rates Filing--2, to be effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5177.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1463-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Fuel Tracker Filing to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5185.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1465-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rate Filing to be effective 11/1/
2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5196.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1466-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.403: PCB TETLP DEC 2010 FILING to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5200.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1467-000.
    Applicants: Trunkline LNG Company, LLC.
    Description: Trunkline LNG Company, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Housekeeping to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5201.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1468-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 10/29/10 Negotiated Rates--Hess to be effective 11/
1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5203.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1469-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 10/29/10 Negotiated Rates--Iberdrola to be
effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5204.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1470-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 10/29/10 Negotiated Rates--NextEra to be effective
11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5206.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1471-000.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Northern Natural Gas Company submits tariff filing per
154.204: 20101029 Negotiated Rates to be effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5209.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1472-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 10/29/10 Negotiated Rates--Sempra to be effective
11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5214.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1473-000.
    Applicants: Colorado Interstate Gas Company.
    Description: Colorado Interstate Gas Company submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Raton Expansion Non Conforming Agreement Filing to be
effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5215.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1474-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: ANR Pipeline Company submits tariff filing per
154.601: ANR Fall Negotiated Rates to be effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5216.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1475-000.
    Applicants: Empire Pipeline, Inc.
    Description: Empire Pipeline, Inc. submits tariff filing per
154.204: Open

Season Addition to be effective 11/28/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5221.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1476-000.
    Applicants: Steckman Ridge, LP.
    Description: Steckman Ridge, LP submits tariff filing per 154.204:
SR-ConocoPhillips K 920036-R1 to be effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101029-5226.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-28029 Filed 11-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: February 16, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 32)]
[Notices]
[Page 8291]
[DOCID:fr16fe06-50]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR06-9-000]

Crosstex Mississippi Pipeline, L.P.; Notice of Petition for
Approval of Rates

February 9, 2006.
    Take notice that on February 1, 2006, Crosstex Mississippi
Pipeline, L.P. (CMP) filed a petition for approval of rates pursuant to
section 284.123 of the Commission's regulations. CMP requests approval
of an increase in its maximum system-wide rate for the interruptible
transportation of natural gas from $0.2549 per MMBtu to $0.3115 per
MMBtu, effective February 1, 2006. In addition, CMP states that it
proposes to retain the actual amount of gas used, on a pro rata basis,
for compressor fuel, company use, and lost and unaccounted for gas.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken,
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: February 28, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-2243 Filed 2-15-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 36532]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14875]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Commission Staff Attendance

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that
members of the Commission's staff may attend the following meetings
related to the transmission planning activities of the New York
Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO):

Joint Inter-Regional Planning Task Force/Electric System Planning
Working Group

June 18, 2012, 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m., Local Time (teleconference only)
June 26, 2012, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m., Local Time
July 10, 2012, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m., Local Time
July 24, 2012, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m., Local Time
August 6, 2012, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m., Local Time
August 28, 2012, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m., Local Time
September 24, 2012, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m., Local Time

    The above-referenced meetings will be held at: NYISO's offices,
Rensselaer, NY.
    The above-referenced meetings are open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at www.nyiso.com.
    The discussions at the meetings described above may address matters
at issue in the following proceeding:

Docket No. ER08-1281, New York Independent System Operator, Inc.

    For more information, contact James Eason, Office of Energy Market
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: June 13, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-14875 Filed 6-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P