[Federal Register: October 29, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 208)]
[Notices]
[Page 55836-55837]
[DOCID:fr29oc09-73]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13356-000]

Slatersville Hydro, LLC; Notice of Intent To Waive Scoping

October 22, 2009.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Exemption From Licensing.
    b. Project No.: P-13356-000.
    c. Date Filed: January 15, 2009.
    d. Applicant: Slatersville Hydro, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Slatersville Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Branch River in Providence County, Rhode
Island. The project would not occupy any land of the United States.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act of
1978, 16 U.S.C. 2705, 2708.
    h. Applicant Contact: Michael P. DeFrancesco, 87 Hall Road, Exeter,
RI 02822,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Tom Dean,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    j. On May 8, 2009, Commission staff requested additional
information from Slatersville Hydro including interim water quality
monitoring reports. On August 5, 2009, Slatersville Hydro filed the
requested information, and on August 13 and October 15, 2009,
Slatersville Hydro filed interim water quality reports (the final water
quality report is due January 15, 2010).
    Based on a review of the exemption application, additional
environmental information subsequently filed by Slatersville Hydro,
resource agency consultation letters and comments filed to date,
Commission staff intend to prepare a single environmental assessment
(EA). The EA will assess the potential effects of project construction

and operation on geology and soils, aquatic, terrestrial, threatened
and endangered species, recreation and land use, aesthetic, and
cultural and historic resources. Because staff believe the issues that
need to be addressed in its EA have been adequately identified, with
this notice, we are soliciting comments on our intent to waive scoping
for the Slatersville Project.
    k. The deadline for filing comments is 30 days from the issuance
date of this notice.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    l. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the three digits in the docket
number field to access the document. For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at (866)
208-3676, or for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is also available
for inspection and reproduction at the address in item h above.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-25978 Filed 10-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33295-33297]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15263]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2006-24210; FMCSA-2010-0162; FMCSA-2012-0162; FMCSA-
2012-0163; FMCSA-2014-0018]

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of exemptions; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to renew exemptions for 94
individuals from its prohibition in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs) against persons with insulin-treated diabetes
mellitus (ITDM) from operating commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in
interstate commerce. The exemptions enable these individuals with ITDM
to continue to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.

DATES: Each group of renewed exemptions were applicable on the dates
stated in the discussions below and will expire on the dates stated in
the discussions below. Comments must be received on or before August
16, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments bearing the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Docket No. FMCSA-2006-24210; FMCSA-2010-0162;
FMCSA-2012-0162; FMCSA-2012-0163; FMCSA-2014-0018 using any of the
following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the
docket number(s) for this notice. Note that all comments received will
be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below
for further information.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The FDMS is available 24 hours each day e.t.,
365 days each year. If you want acknowledgment that we received your
comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope or postcard
or print the acknowledgement page that appears after submitting
comments online.
    Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed
at http://www.dot.gov/privacy.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Christine A. Hydock, Chief,
Medical Programs Division,<PHONE_NUMBER>, [email protected], FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W64-224,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30
p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have
questions regarding viewing or submitting material to the docket,
contact Docket Services, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
for five years if it finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety that is equivalent to or greater than the level that
would be achieved absent such exemption.'' The statute also allows the
Agency to renew exemptions at the end of the five-year period. FMCSA
grants exemptions from the FMCSRs for a two-year period to align with
the maximum duration of a driver's medical certification.
    The physical qualification standard for drivers regarding diabetes
found in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) states that a person is physically
qualified to drive a CMV if that person has no established medical
history or clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus currently requiring
insulin for control.
    The 94 individuals listed in this notice have requested renewal of
their exemptions from the diabetes standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3), in
accordance with FMCSA procedures. Accordingly, FMCSA has evaluated
these applications for renewal on their merits and decided to extend
each exemption for a renewable two-year period.

II. Request for Comments

    Interested parties or organizations possessing information that
would otherwise show that any, or all, of these drivers are not
currently achieving the statutory level of safety should immediately
notify FMCSA. The Agency will evaluate any adverse evidence submitted
and, if safety is being compromised or if continuation of the exemption
would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA will take immediate steps to revoke the
exemption of a driver.

III. Basis for Renewing Exemptions

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(1), an exemption may be granted for no
longer than two years from its approval date and may be renewed upon
application. In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each of
the 94 applicants has satisfied the renewal conditions for obtaining an
exemption from the diabetes requirement (71 FR 32177; 71 FR 45097; 75
FR 36775; 75 FR 50797; 77 FR 36333; 77 FR 40941; 77 FR 46791; 77 FR
51845; 79 FR 41723; 79 FR 56105; 81 FR 91242). They have maintained
their required medical monitoring and have not exhibited any medical
issues that would compromise their ability to safely operate a CMV
during the previous two-year exemption period. These factors provide an
adequate basis for predicting each driver's ability to continue to
drive safely in interstate commerce. Therefore, FMCSA concludes that
extending the exemption for each of these drivers for a period of two
years is likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing
without the exemption.
    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, the following
groups of drivers received renewed exemptions in the month of August
and are discussed below:
    As of August 6, 2018, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315, the following ten individuals have satisfied the renewal
conditions for obtaining an exemption from the rule prohibiting drivers
with ITDM from

driving CMVs in interstate commerce (77 FR 36333; 77 FR 46791; 81 FR
91242):

Bruce R. Bennett (MN)
Stephen W. Best (PA)
Steven D. Hancock (IN)
Michael A. Hendrickson (OR)
James B. Hills (KS)
Charles Keegan, Jr. (NJ)
Londell W. Luther (MD)
Darrell L. Meadows (TX)
Allyn E. Smith (SD)
Jason R. Zeorian (NE)

    The drivers were included in docket number FMCSA-2012-0162. Their
exemptions are applicable as of August 6, 2018, and will expire on
August 6, 2020.
    As of August 8, 2018, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315, the following 23 individuals have satisfied the renewal
conditions for obtaining an exemption from the rule prohibiting drivers
with ITDM from driving CMVs in interstate commerce (71 FR 32177; 71 FR
45097; 81 FR 91242):

Scott R. Anderson (WI)
Robert R. Chase (NE)
Todd A. Dean (WV)
Dale R. Gansz (IL)
Donald W. Havourd, Sr. (CT)
Jeffrey M. King (OR)
Jeffrey S. Knight (WA)
Edward V. Kruse (IA)
Lee P. Lembke (WI)
Dominick T. Mastroni (KS)
Derril W. Nunnally (GA)
Robert L. Pflugler, Jr. (PA)
Ronald B. Purdum (IL)
Wilbert C. Rasely, Jr. (PA)
Ron R. Rawson (AZ)
Duane C. Rieger (ND)
Gregory A. Rigg (MI)
Vernon L. Small (CO)
Walter D. Stowman (NJ)
Henry B. Walker-Waltz (OR)
Arthur C. Webber (PA)
Scott A. Wertz (ND)
Danny R. Wood (MO)

    The drivers were included in docket number FMCSA-2006-24210. Their
exemptions are applicable as of August 8, 2018, and will expire on
August 8, 2020.
    As of August 17, 2018, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, the following 7 individuals have satisfied the renewal
conditions for obtaining an exemption from the rule prohibiting drivers
with ITDM from driving CMVs in interstate commerce (75 FR 36775; 75 FR
50797; 81 FR 91242):

Gary L. Alexander (MO)
Daniel E. Bergstresser (NY)
Stephen F. Clendenin (NY)
Pradip B. Desai (PA)
Howard M. Galton (IL)
Steve Gumienny (CA)
Hubert S. Paxton (KY)

    The drivers were included in docket number FMCSA-2010-0162. Their
exemptions are applicable as of August 17, 2018, and will expire on
August 17, 2020.
    As of August 19, 2018, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, the following 45 individuals have satisfied the renewal
conditions for obtaining an exemption from the rule prohibiting drivers
with ITDM from driving CMVs in interstate commerce (79 FR 41723; 79 FR
56105; 81 FR 91242):

Charles Ackerman Jr. (NJ)
William J. Applebee (WI)
Benjamin L. Baxter (MI)
Stephen M. Berggren (MN)
Patrick J. Burns (MN)
Robert L. Caudill (OH)
Charles L. Cran (WI)
Kevin W. Elder (NC)
Michael J. Eldridge, Sr. (IA)
Kevin D. Erickson (WI)
Dale A. Godejohn (ND)
Robert R. Gonzales (CA)
Norman D. Groves (MO)
Kenneth F. Gwaltney (IN)
Mathew R. Hale (KS)
Donald K. Hamilton (FL)
John L. Holtzclaw (MO)
Christopher H. Horn (NH)
Kip J. Kauffman (WI)
Christopher J. Kittoe (WI)
Joshua L. Kroetch (MN)
Salvador Lopez (AZ)
Joseph M. Macias (NM)
Robert J. Marino (NJ)
David J. McCoy (UT)
William E. Medlin (MN)
Carlos A. Napoles, Jr. (NJ)
Kathryn J. Nelms (KS)
Antonio C. Oliveira (PA)
Christopher P. Overton (IL)
Stephen J. Pelton (PA)
Bryant S. Perry (NC)
Kenneth R. Perschon (IL)
Joseph R. Polhamus (LA)
Rodney B. Roberts (MS)
Mark J. Rone (IL)
John J. Steigauf (MN)
William L. Thompson (MN)
Robert D. Watts (TX)
Cindy L. Wells (NY)
Charles W. White (IN)
Michael G. Worl (MT)
Tommy W. Wornick (TX)
Robert T. Yeftich (IN)
Chad C. Yerkey (PA)

    The drivers were included in docket number FMCSA-2014-0018. Their
exemptions are applicable as of August 19, 2018, and will expire on
August 19, 2020.
    As of August 27, 2018, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, the following nine individuals have satisfied the renewal
conditions for obtaining an exemption from the rule prohibiting drivers
with ITDM from driving CMVs in interstate commerce (77 FR 40941; 77 FR
51845; 81 FR 91242):

Randall W. Amtower (WV)
Steven Brickey (CO)
Randall L. Corrick (ND)
Raymond G. Gravesandy (NY)
Gregory M. Harris (TX)
Kelly M. Keller (ND)
Joseph L. Miska (MN)
Jacob D. Oxford (ID)
Ramon I. Zamora-Ortiz (WA)

    The drivers were included in docket number FMCSA-2012-0163. Their
exemptions are applicable as of August 27, 2018, and will expire on
August 27, 2020.

IV. Conditions and Requirements:

    The exemptions are extended subject to the following conditions:
(1) Each driver must submit a quarterly monitoring checklist completed
by the treating endocrinologist as well as an annual checklist with a
comprehensive medical evaluation; (2) each driver must report within
two business days of occurrence, all episodes of severe hypoglycemia,
significant complications, or inability to manage diabetes; also, any
involvement in an accident or any other adverse event in a CMV or
personal vehicle, whether or not it is related to an episode of
hypoglycemia; (3) each driver must submit an annual ophthalmologist's
or optometrist's report; and (4) each driver must provide a copy of the
annual medical certification to the employer for retention in the
driver's qualification file, or keep a copy in his/her driver's
qualification file if he/she is self-employed. The driver must also
have a copy of the exemption when driving, for presentation to a duly
authorized Federal, State, or local enforcement official. The exemption
will be rescinded if: (1) The person fails to comply with the terms and
conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a lower
level of safety than was maintained before it was granted; or (3)
continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals
and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315.

V. Preemption

    During the period the exemption is in effect, no State shall
enforce any law or regulation that conflicts with this exemption with
respect to a person operating under the exemption.

VI. Conclusion

    Based upon its evaluation of the 94 exemption applications, FMCSA
renews the exemptions of the aforementioned drivers from the rule
prohibiting drivers with ITDM from driving CMVs in interstate commerce.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each exemption will be
valid for two years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA.

    Issued on: July 12, 2018.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-15263 Filed 7-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 69 (Monday, April 11, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21056-21057]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07569]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0243; Airspace Docket No. 20-AWP-10]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Modification of Class D Airspace, Proposed Removal and
Establishment of Class E Airspace; Oxnard Airport, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to remove the Class E airspace,
designated as an extension to a Class D or Class E surface area.
Additionally, this action proposes to establish Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface. Lastly, this action
proposes administrative updates to the Class D airspace legal
description. These actions will ensure the safety and management of
instrument flight rules (IFR) at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 26, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone:
1-800-647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2021-0243; Airspace Docket No. 20-AWP-10, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathan A. Chaffman, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western Service Center, Operations Support Group, 2200
S 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority,
as it would modify Class D and Class E airspace, and establish Class E
airspace at Oxnard Airport, to support IFR operations at the airport.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Persons wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2021-0243;
Airspace Docket No. 20-AWP-10''. The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 2200 S 216th Street, Des Moines, WA
98198.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective
September 15, 2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F
lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service
routes, and reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 by removing the
Class E airspace, designated as an extension to a Class D or Class E
surface area. This airspace is west of the airport and is no longer
required to contain IFR arrivals descending below 1,000 feet above the
surface.
    This action also proposes to establish Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface. This airspace is designated to
contain arriving IFR aircraft descending below 1,500 feet above the
surface, and departing IFR aircraft until they reach 1,200 feet above
the surface.
    Finally, the FAA proposes several administrative updates to the
Class D legal description. The current description requires
modification to replace the use of the phrases ``Notice to Airmen'' and
``Airport/Facility Directive.'' These phrases should read ``Notice to
Air Missions'' and ``Chart Supplement,'' respectively, in the Oxnard
Class D airspace legal description. Additionally, the Oxnard Airport's
Class D airspace abuts the Class D areas of Point Mugu Naval Air
Station Airport and Camarillo Airport. The geographic coordinates in
the Oxnard Airport Class D legal description should be updated to more
accurately define the common borders of the three Class D surface
areas, which would not represent a change to the current boundaries.
    Class D, Class E4 and Class E5 airspace designations are published
in paragraphs 5000, 6004, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September 15, 2021,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
FAA Order JO 7400.11.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial, and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

AWP CA D Oxnard, CA [Amended]

Oxnard Airport, CA
    (Lat. 34[deg]12'03'' N, long. 119[deg]12'26'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,000 feet MSL within a 4.3-mile radius of the airport, excluding
that portion east and southeast of a line beginning at lat.
34[deg]15'38.75'' N, long. 119[deg]09'34.88'' W, to lat.
34[deg]10'22'' N, long. 119[deg]09'27'' W, to lat. 34[deg]07'44.53''
N, long. 119[deg]12'18.39'' W. This Class D airspace area is
effective during the specific dates and times established in advance
by a Notice to Air Missions. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continuously published in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to
a Class D or Class E Surface Area.

* * * * *

AWP CA E4 Oxnard, CA [Removed]

Oxnard Airport, CA
    (Lat. 34[deg]12'03'' N, long. 119[deg]12'26'' W)

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AWP CA E5 Oxnard, CA [New]

Oxnard Airport, CA
    (Lat. 34[deg]12'03'' N, long. 119[deg]12'26'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 4.8-mile radius of the airport, and within 2 miles each
side of the 091[deg] bearing from the airport, extending from the
4.8-mile radius to 12.4 miles east of the airport, and within 1.8
miles each side of the 265[deg] bearing from the airport, extending
from the 4.8-mile radius to 6.5 miles west of Oxnard Airport.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on April 4, 2022.
B.G. Chew,
Acting Group Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2022-07569 Filed 4-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Page 1 of 2 Memorandum From: Carey A. Johnston, P. E. USEPA/ OW/ OST ph: ( 202) 566 1014 johnston. carey@ epa. gov To: Public Record for the 2006 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan EPA Docket Number OW 2004 0032 ( www. epa. gov/ edockets/)

Date: November 10, 2005 Re: Global Environmental Management Initiative Website ( http:// www. gemi. org/ water/ casestudies. htm)

This memorandum incorporates by reference case studies identified by Global Environmental Management Initiative website: http:// www. gemi. org/ water/ casestudies. htm into the public record for the " 2006 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan," EPA Docket Number: OW 2004 0032.

Since 1990, the Global Environmental Management Initiative ( GEMI) has created tools and provided strategies to help business foster global environmental, healthy and safety excellence and economic success. GEMI is an organization of leading companies dedicated to foster global environmental, health and safety ( EHS) excellence through the sharing of tools and information to help business achieve EHS excellence.

GEMI's website states that there are emerging signals that the business case is building for companies to develop more coordinated, forward looking, and sustainable water strategies. Businesses, communities, and ecosystems everywhere depend on clean freshwater to survive and prosper. Global demand for freshwater, however, continues to grow, while many water sources are showing signs of stress. Companies that understand the trends shaping the global business environment will be better positioned to identify new market opportunities, mitigate risk, develop sustainable water strategies, and create shareholder value. See: http:// www. gemi. org/ water/.

GEMI's Water Sustainability Work Group has developed a tool   the Water Sustainability Tool   to help businesses better understand and guide your own organization's relationship to water. The Water Sustainability Tool can assist individual companies and other organizations to better understand what emerging water issues might mean for them, given their operations, needs, and circumstances. The tool is designed to help individual companies build a business water strategy. GEMI states that the tool encourages businesses to: Page 2 of 2 C Conduct a systematic assessment of their relationship to water;

C Identify specific opportunities and risks associated with this relationship;

C Assess the business case for action;

C Tailor a water strategy that addresses specific needs and circumstances of the organization; and C Ensure that water related opportunities and risks are tracked and managed effectively into the future using a continual improvement framework.

The GEMI website has a number of case studies involving facilities employing water conservation techniques and technologies to more efficiently use water. For example, the GEMI case studies website provides the following example:

ConAgra Foods' Butterball Turkey facility in Huntsville, Arkansas employed a variety of technical fixes, including installing water meters, using a vacuum pump recycle tank and re piping supply water, to save about 300,000 gallons of water a day. This will allow the facility to double production yet only increase its total water use by 15%.

ConAgra Foods' Golden Valley Microwave Foods facility in Edina, Minnesota installed new pipes, introduced new controls to shut off water during downtime, and used recycled water during some phases of the manufacturing process to reduce water purchases by 70% ( 15 million gallons) annually. This reduced the city's total water demands by nearly 1%, and earned recognition from the Minnesota Council of Environmental Services.

Source: http:// www. gemi. org/ water/ conagra2. htm


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 21, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55480-55481]
[FR Doc No: 2017-25137]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-82086; File No. SR-NYSE-2017-58]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Section 902.06 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual

November 15, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on November 1, 2017, New York Stock Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange''
or ``NYSE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Section 902.06 of the NYSE Listed
Company Manual (the ``Manual''). The proposed rule change is available
on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On October 11, 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') approved the Exchange's proposed rule change to adopt
initial and continued listing standards for subscription receipts.\3\
After approval, it was discovered that the proposed rule text attached
as Exhibit 5 to the Exchange's Rule 19b-4 filing contained an error to
the part of the filing amending the listing fees in Section 902.06. The
Exchange proposes to correct the inadvertent error.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81856 (October 11,
2017), 82 FR 48296 (October 17, 2017) (SR-NYSE-2017-31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In connection with adopting initial and continued listing standards
for subscription receipts, the Exchange amended Section 902.06 of the
Manual to specify how listing fees for subscription receipts would be
charged. Section 902.06 of the Manual sets forth listing fees for
``short-term'' securities, i.e., securities with a life of seven years
or less. Because subscription receipts listed under Section 102.08 of
the Manual have a maximum life of 12 months, the Exchange stated in the
Purpose Section of its proposed rule change that it would amend Section
902.06 to make explicit that such section would apply to subscription
receipts. However, in drafting the proposed rule text contained in
Exhibit 5 to its Rule 19b-4 filing, the Exchange inadvertently included
subscription receipts in a list of securities to which Section 902.06
of the Manual does not apply. The Exchange now proposes to amend
Section 902.06 to correct the error in the actual rule text that was
adopted to make clear that Section 902.06 does apply to subscription
receipts.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\4\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(5) \5\ of the Act, in particular, in that
it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
The Exchange believes that the proposed amendment is consistent with
the protection of investors because it seeks to amend the Manual to
accurately reflect how the Exchange intends to charge listing fees for
subscription receipts as stated in the description of

the application of listing fees to subscription receipts as contained
in the Purpose Section of SR-NYSE-2017-31. The Exchange believes that
it is to the benefit of investors and the public interest that it
correct the error in the actual rule text that was adopted to make
clear that Section 902.06 does apply to subscription receipts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. The Exchange notes
that the proposed rule change will correct an unintentional error in
the rule text about how it intends to charge listing fees for
subscription receipts.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, provided that the self-regulatory organization
has given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission,\6\ the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does
not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing.
However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\9\ the Commission may
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has
requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay. In its
proposal, the Exchange stated that waiving the 30-day operative delay
would be consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest because it would ensure that the rule text contained in
Section 902.06 of the Manual accurately reflects the Exchange's
intended change as described in the purpose section of NYSE-2017-31.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay
should help prevent potential confusion to market participants as to
the applicable listing and annual fees for subscription receipts under
NYSE rules by correcting an error made in a prior approved
proposal.\10\ The Commission further notes that it received no comments
on the description of the proposed fees contained in the prior
proposal, and that the correction being made in this rule filing will
conform the applicable fees for subscription receipts to those that
were originally intended by NYSE.\11\ Therefore, the Commission
believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest and designates the
proposed rule change as operative upon filing.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81856 (October 11,
2017), 82 FR 48296 (October 17, 2017) (order approving SR-NYSE-2017-
31).
    \11\ See id. See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81102
(July 7, 2017), 82 FR 32413 (July 13, 2017) (notice of filing of SR-
NYSE-2017-31).
    \12\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \13\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is
consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the
following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File No. SR-NYSE-2017-58 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSE-2017-58. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSE-2017-58, and should be
submitted on or before December 12, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-25137 Filed 11-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 235 (Friday, December 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57973-57974]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26529]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0599; FRL-9971-44-OAR]

Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request;
Recordkeeping and Reporting for the Renewable Fuel Standard Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is planning to submit an
information collection request (ICR), ``Recordkeeping and Reporting for
the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Program,'' EPA ICR No. 2546.01, OMB
Control No. 2060-NEW) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Before doing so, EPA is soliciting public
comments on specific aspects of the proposed information collection as
described below. This is a request for approval of a new collection. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 6, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2017-0599, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by
email to [email protected], or by mail to: EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information for which disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Anne-Marie Pastorkovich, Attorney/
Advisor, Office of Air and Radiation/Office of Transportation and Air
Quality, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
(6405A), Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. EPA
will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate.
The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and
approval. At that time, EPA will issue another Federal Register notice
to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to
submit additional comments to OMB.
    This ICR package is a new information collection that is intended
to streamline and update estimates related to RFS. This new collection
includes elements of some existing RFS ICRs. The goal of this new,
consolidated ICR is to put all RFS estimates into one, consistent, and
easy-to-understand format. We hope that this single RFS ICR package
will assist interested parties in better understanding all of the
information collection activities associated with RFS.

What is the RFS program?

    The RFS program was created under the Energy Policy Act of 2005
(EPAct), which amended the Clean Air Act (CAA). The Energy Independence
and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) further amended the CAA by expanding
the RFS program. EPA implements RFS in consultation with U.S.
Department of Agriculture and the Department of Energy. The RFS program
is a national policy that requires a certain volume of renewable fuel
to replace or reduce the quantity of petroleum-based transportation
fuel, heating oil or jet fuel.
    Obligated parties under the RFS program are refiners or importers
of gasoline or diesel fuel. Obligated parties, and exporters of
renewable fuel, must meet an annual Renewable Volume Obligation (RVO).
Parties meet their RVO by blending renewable fuels into transportation
fuel, or by obtaining credits (called ``Renewable Identification
Numbers'', or RINs). EPA calculates and establishes RVOs every year
through rulemaking, based on the CAA volume requirements and
projections of gasoline and diesel production for the coming year. The
standards are converted into a percentage and obligated parties must

demonstrate compliance annually. RINs are the credits that obligated
parties use to demonstrate compliance with the standard. RINS are
generated by producers and importers of renewable fuels and traded by
various parties. Obligated parties must obtain sufficient RINs for each
category in order to demonstrate compliance with the annual standard.
    In order to track compliance with the RFS program, various parties
involved with the production and blending of renewable fuels, and who
generate, trade or use RINs, must register with EPA and submit various
types of compliance reports related to the activity they engage in
under the program. Our estimates as to burden are explained in the
supporting statement that has been placed in the public docket.
Domestic and foreign entities may be subject to these regulations and
to the associated information collection. The RFS program was developed
with certain flexibilities, including for small entities such as small
refiners and small refineries, small blenders, and small volume
production facilities and importers.

What are the recordkeeping and reporting requirements associated with
the RFS program?

    The reporting requirements of the RFS program typically fall under
registration and compliance reporting. Recordkeeping requirements
include product transfer documents (PTDs) and retention of records that
support items reported. Recordkeeping and reporting are based upon the
role the party fills under the regulations. A party may be registered
in more than one role. Basing the recordkeeping and reporting upon a
party's roles in the program ensures that parties must sustain only the
burden necessary under the program. EPA continuously assesses its
registration and reporting systems in an effort to provide the best
possible service to the regulated community and in order to enhance,
simplify, and streamline the experience. Because RFS relies upon a
marketplace of RINs, EPA has created and maintains the EPA Moderated
Transaction System (EMTS) capable of handling a high volume of RIN
trading activities.

Who are the respondents for the RFS program?

    The respondents to this ICR are: RIN Generators (producers and
importers of renewable fuel), Obligated Parties (refiners and importers
of gasoline and diesel), Exporters (of renewable fuel), RIN Owners,
independent third-party Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) Providers, and
certain petitioners under the international aggregate compliance
approach (such petitions are infrequent). These parties and their
associated information collections are described in detail in the
supporting statement and tables, which have been placed in the docket.

Which ICRs are being consolidated into this new collection?

    This proposed ICR will supersede and replace existing information
collection currently approved under the following titles and OMB
control numbers (with expiration dates shown):
     Renewable Fuels Standard Program (RFS2-Supplemental), OMB
Control Number 2060-0637; expires 10/31/2017;
     Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2) Program, OMB Control Number
2060-0640; expires 10/31/2017;
     RFS2 Voluntary RIN Quality Assurance Program, OMB Control
Number 2060-0688; expires 4/30/2019; and
     Cellulosic Production Volume Projections and Efficient
Producer Reporting, OMB Control Number 2060-0707, expires 12/31/2019.
    This proposed new ICR includes burdens associated with Renewable
Fuel Pathways II and Technical Amendments to the RFS2 Standards, for
which a final rule was published on July 18, 2014. 79 FR 42128.
Although ICR estimates were prepared for the proposed rule, it appears
they were not submitted to OMB with the final rule through an
administrative error. This proposed new ICR also includes burdens
associated with the following previously approved, but not currently
approved, ICRs: Regulation of Fuel and Fuel Additives: 2011 Renewable
Fuel Standards--Petition for International Aggregate Compliance
Approach, OMB Control Number 2060-0655; expired 5/31/2017; and
Production Outlook Report for Unregistered Renewable Fuels Producers,
OMB Control Number 2060-0660; expired 7/31/2017.
    Form Numbers: RFS0104: RFS Activity Report, RFS0303: RFS Annual
Compliance Report, RFS0601: RFS Renewable Fuel Producer Supplemental
Report, RFS0701: RFS Renewable Fuel Producer Co-Products Report,
RFS0801: RFS Renewable Biomass Report, RFS0901: RFS Production Outlook
Report, RFS1400: Reporting Fuels under 80.1451(b)(1)(ii)(T), RFS1500:
Reporting Fuels under 80.1451(b)(1)(ii)(T)--Finished Fuel Blending,
RFS1600: Reporting Fuels under 80.1451(b)(1)(ii)(T)--Blender Contact,
RFS2000: Batch Verification, RFS2100: Aggregate RIN Verification.
RFS2200: On-Site Audit Report, RFS2300: List of Potentially Invalid
RINs, RFS2400: Mass Balance, RFS2500: RFS Efficient Producer Data
Report, RFS2700: RFS Cellulosic Biofuel Producer Questionnaire, EMTS:
RFS RIN Generation Report, EMTS: RFS RIN Transaction Report.
    Respondents/affected entities: RIN Generators, Obligated Parties,
RIN Owners, Exporters, QAP Providers, and Petitioners under the
international aggregate compliance approach. These parties include
producers and importers of renewable fuels and refiners and importers
of gasoline and diesel transportation fuels.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: The RFS program represents a
mixture of voluntary and mandatory reporting, depending upon activity.
A single party may register with multiple program roles--e.g., a party
might be both an obligated party and a RIN owner.
    Estimated number of respondents: 20,425
    Frequency of response: On occasion/daily, quarterly, annual.
    Total estimated burden: 530,336 (per year). Burden is defined at 5
CFR 1320.03(b)
    Total estimated cost: $52,845,438 (per year), includes $0
annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.

    Dated: November 27, 2017.
Byron J. Bunker,
Director, Compliance Division, Office of Transportation & Air Quality,
Office of Air & Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2017-26529 Filed 12-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 130 (Monday, July 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 36590]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14691]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-92329; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2021-027]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change To Introduce a New Data Product
To Be Known as Short Sale Volume Data

July 6, 2021.
    On May 28, 2021, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to introduce a
new data product to be known as Short Sale Volume data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal
Register on June 16, 2021.\3\ On June 30, 2021, the Exchange withdrew
the proposed rule change (SR-CboeEDGX-2021-027).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92147 (June 10,
2021), 86 FR 32085. Comment on the proposed rule change is located
at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboeedgx-2021-027/srcboeedgx2021027.htm.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-14691 Filed 7-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P