[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 196 (Thursday, October 14, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57027-57030]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22293]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0261; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01502-T;
Amendment 39-21753; AD 2021-20-15]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2019-19-
06, which applied to certain Airbus SAS Model A330-202, -243, -243F, -
302, -323, and -343 airplanes. AD 2019-19-06 required an inspection to
determine the part number and serial number of the slat geared rotary
actuators (SGRAs), and replacement of each affected SGRA with a
serviceable part. This AD continues to require replacement of each
affected SGRA with a serviceable part, expands the applicability to
include all airplanes on which the affected part may be installed, and
also prohibits installation of an affected part; as specified in a
European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is incorporated
by reference. This AD was prompted by a report that cracks have been
found within the ring gears of the SGRAs due to a change in the
manufacturing process and inadequate post-production non-destructive
testing for potential cracking, and a determination that the
requirements of AD 2019-19-06 may not ensure the permanent removal from
service of affected SGRAs. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective November 18, 2021.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of November 18,
2021.

ADDRESSES: For material incorporated by reference (IBR) in this AD,
contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone
+49 221 8999 000; email [email protected]; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website
at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available in
the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0261.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-
0261; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2020-0245, dated November 9, 2020
(EASA AD 2020-0245) (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or the MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition
for all Airbus A330-201, A330-202, A330-203, A330-223, A330-223F, A330-
243, A330-243F, A330-301, A330-302, A330-303, A330-321, A330-322, A330-
323, A330-341, A330-342, A330-343, A330-743L, A330-841, and A330-941
airplanes. EASA AD 2020-0245 supersedes EASA AD 2019-0093 (which
corresponds to FAA AD 2019-19-06, Amendment 39-19742 (84 FR 51960,
October 1, 2019) (AD 2019-19-06)). Model A330-743L airplanes are not
certificated by the FAA and are not included on the U.S. type
certificate data sheet; this AD therefore does not include those
airplanes in the applicability.
    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2019-19-06. AD 2019-19-06 applied to
certain Airbus SAS Model A330-202, -243, -243F, -302, -323, and -343
airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on April 7, 2021
(86 FR 17995). The NPRM was prompted by a report that cracks have been
found within the ring gears of the SGRAs due to a change in the
manufacturing process and inadequate post-production non-destructive
testing for potential cracking, and a determination that the
requirements of AD 2019-19-06 may not ensure the permanent removal from
service of affected SGRAs. The NPRM proposed to continue to require
replacement of each affected SGRA with a serviceable part, would expand
the applicability to include all airplanes on which the affected part
may be installed, and would also prohibit installation of an affected
part, as specified in EASA AD 2020-0245.
    The FAA is issuing this AD to address cracking of an SGRA, which,
in combination with an independent failure on the second SGRA of the
same slat surface, could lead to an uncontrolled movement of the
affected slat surface in flight, or detachment of the slat surface, and
could possibly result in damage to the stabilizers and reduced
controllability of the airplane. See the MCAI for additional background
information.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment. The Air
Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) expressed support for the
NPRM.

Request To Clarify Service Bulletin Reference

    Delta Air Lines (DAL) requested clarification of the reference to
``the SB'' in the statement ``in accordance with the instructions of
the SB'' in EASA AD 2020-0245. DAL gave no justification for the
request.
    The FAA agrees to clarify. The Definitions section of EASA AD 2020-
0245 clearly defines ``The SB'' and ``The Liebherr SB.'' Therefore,
``the SB'' in the specified statement refers to Airbus Service Bulletin
A330-27-3233, dated March 7, 2019. This AD has not been changed as a
result of this comment.

Request To Add Paragraph Identifying Certain Parts as Not Affected

    DAL requested that paragraph (h)(5) be added to the proposed AD to
specify that ``units listed [in] Liebherr SB 926C-27-01 Table 1 are not
considered an affected part.'' DAL refers to the Note that accompanies
Table 1 in the Liebherr Service Bulletin 926C-27-01, dated December 18,
2018 (Liebherr SB 926C-27-01), as justification for the request.
    The FAA disagrees with the request to add the specified paragraph
because it is an incorrect statement. Table 1 in Liebherr SB 926C-27-01
is titled ``Affected Serial Numbers'' and contains the list of three
different serial number ranges. Parts with serial numbers included in
those ranges are considered affected parts, except for parts mentioned
in the Note, that is, parts already inspected during the final assembly
line that are specifically marked as ``WOI-01'' on the identification
plate. This is consistent with the definition of ``Affected part'' in
the MCAI, which identifies the serial numbers in the table as affected
parts ``except those that have passed (no defects found) an inspection,
or have been repaired, as applicable, in accordance with the
instructions of the Liebherr SB.'' This AD has not been changed with
regard to this request.

Change to This Final Rule

    The FAA has revised the format of paragraph (h)(2) of this AD.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this final rule with the change described previously
and minor editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these minor
changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
    The FAA also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2020-0245 describes procedures for replacing each affected
SGRA, and specifies a prohibition against installation of an affected
part.
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 123 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Action                Labor cost       Parts cost        Cost per product     Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retained action from AD 2019-  17 work-hours x             * $0  $1,445.................  $177,735.
 19-06.                         $85 per hour =
                                $1,445.
New actions..................  Up to 15 work-               * 0  Up to $1,275...........  Up to $156,825.
                                hours x $85 per
                                hour = Up to
                                $1,275.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The FAA has received no definitive data on which to base the cost estimates for the parts specified in this
  AD.

    According to the manufacturer, some or all of the costs of this AD
may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected operators. The FAA does not control warranty coverage for
affected operators. As a result, the FAA has included all known costs
in the cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2019-19-06, Amendment 39-19742
(84 FR 51960, October 1, 2019); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:

2021-20-15 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39-21753; Docket No. FAA-2021-0261;
Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01502-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective November 18,
2021.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2019-19-06, Amendment 39-19742 (84 FR 51960,
October 1, 2019) (AD 2019-19-06).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Airbus SAS airplanes specified in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of this AD, certificated in any
category.
    (1) Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, and -243 airplanes.
    (2) Model A330-223F and -243F airplanes.
    (3) Model A330-301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342,
and -343 airplanes.
    (4) Model A330-841 airplanes.
    (5) Model A330-941 airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27, Flight
controls.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report that cracks have been found
within the ring gears of the slat geared rotary actuators (SGRAs)
due to a change in the manufacturing process and inadequate post-
production non-destructive testing for potential cracking, and a
determination that the requirements of AD 2019-19-06 may not ensure
the permanent removal from service of affected SGRAs. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address cracking of an SGRA, which, in
combination with an independent failure on the second SGRA of the
same slat surface, could lead to an uncontrolled movement of the
affected slat surface in flight, or detachment of the slat surface,
and could possibly result in damage to the stabilizers and reduced
controllability of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2020-0245, dated November 9, 2020 (EASA AD 2020-0245).

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020-0245

    (1) Where EASA AD 2020-0245 refers to May 10, 2019 (the
effective date of EASA AD 2019-0093), this AD requires using
November 5, 2019 (the effective date of AD 2019-19-06).
    (2) Where paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2020-0245 specifies a method
of accomplishment of certain actions, replace the text ``replace
each affected part with a serviceable part in accordance with the
instructions of the SB,'' with ``removal of each affected part and
installation of a serviceable part in accordance with paragraphs
3.C. (2) and 3.C. (3) of the SB.''
    (3) Where EASA AD 2020-0245 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (4) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2020-0245 does not apply
to this AD.

 (i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, send it
to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (j) of this
AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus
SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by
paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, if any service information contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and
tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests
that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the
airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC
require approval of an AMOC.

(j) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Vladimir Ulyanov,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200

South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-
3229; email [email protected].

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
November 18, 2021.
    (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2020-0245,
dated November 9, 2020.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (4) For EASA AD 2020-0245, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (5) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. This material may be found in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0261.
    (6) You may view this material that is incorporated by reference
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
[email protected], or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on September 22, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-22293 Filed 10-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15467-15468]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05704]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 34531; File No. 812-15267]

Panagram Capital, LLC, et al.

March 14, 2022.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'').

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of application for an order under section 17(d) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') and rule 17d-1 under the
Act to permit certain joint transactions otherwise prohibited by
section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act.

Summary of Application: Applicants request an order to permit certain
closed-end management investment companies to co-invest in portfolio
companies with each other and with certain affiliated investment
entities.

Applicants: Panagram Capital, LLC; Panagram Structured Asset
Management, LLC; Panagram Senior Loan Fund I, LP; Panagram Senior Loan
Fund II, LP; Panagram Senior Loan Fund III, LP; Panagram Senior Loan
Fund IV, LP; Panagram Senior Loan Fund V, LP; Panagram Senior Loan Fund
VI, LP; Panagram Senior Loan Fund VII, LP; and Panagram Senior Loan
Fund VIII, LP.

Filing Dates: The application was filed on September 24, 2021, and
amended on October 15, 2021, and January 7, 2022.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing on any application by emailing
the Commission's Secretary at [email protected] and serving the
Applicants with a copy of the request by email, if an email address is
listed for the relevant Applicant below, or personally or by mail, if a
physical address is listed for the relevant Applicant below. Hearing
requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on April 8,
2022, and should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in
the form of an affidavit, or, for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the
desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason for the request,
and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing
may request notification by emailing the Commission's Secretary at
[email protected].

ADDRESSES: The Commission: [email protected]. Applicants: Jamie
Kim, Esq. Panagram Structured Asset Management, LLC, 51 Astor Place,
12th Floor, New York, NY 10003 and [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura L. Solomon, Senior Counsel, or
Lisa Reid Ragen, Branch Chief, at<PHONE_NUMBER> (Division of
Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For Applicants' representations, legal
analysis, and conditions, please refer to Applicants' second amended
and restated application, dated January 7, 2022, which may be obtained
via the Commission's website by searching for the file number at the
top of this document, or for an Applicant using the Company name search
field on the SEC's EDGAR system. The SEC's EDGAR system may be searched
at http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/legacy/companysearch.html. You
may also call the SEC's Public Reference Room at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-05704 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 168 (Thursday, August 31, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60146-60147]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18926]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[USCG-2023-0706]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River MM 476, Davenport, IA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
all navigable waters in the Upper Mississippi River at Mile Marker (MM)
476.6. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment from all potential hazards associated with the power
line crossing project. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector Upper Mississippi River (COTP) or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from August 31,
2023 through September 11, 2023. For the purposes of enforcement,
actual notice will be used from August 28, 2023 until August 31, 2023.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2023-0706 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email MSTC Nathaniel Dibley, Sector Upper Mississippi River
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 314-269-
2560, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because potential hazards created by the
power line crossing over the Upper Mississippi River and lack
sufficient time to provide a reasonable comment period and then
consider those comments before issuing the rule. It is impracticable to
publish an NPRM because we must establish this safety zone by August
28, 2023.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards associated with the power line
crossing starting August 28, 2023.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The Captain of the Port Sector Upper Mississippi (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards associated with the power line
crossing starting August 28, 2023, will be a safety concern for anyone
operating or transiting within the Upper Mississippi River from MM 476-
477. This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment in the navigable waters within the safety zone while the
power line crossing is being conducted.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone during an power line crossing
project over the Upper Mississippi River on August 28, 2023 through
September 11, 2023. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters
from MM 476-477. The duration of the zone is intended to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these navigable
waters while the power line crosses the Upper Mississippi River. No
vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative via
VHF-FM channel 16, or through USCG Sector Upper Mississippi River at
314-269-2332. Persons and vessels permitted to enter the safety zone
must comply with all lawful orders or directions issued by the COTP or
designated representative. The COTP or a designated representative will
inform the public of the effective period for the safety zone as well
as any changes in the dates and times of enforcement, as well as
reductions in the size of the safety zone as conditions improve,
through Local Notice to Mariners (LNMs), Broadcast Notices to Mariners
(BNMs), and/or Safety Marine Information Broadcast (SMIB), as
appropriate.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on a safety zone
located on the Upper Mississippi River MM 476-477 near Davenport, IA.
The safety zone will be active only while work associated with the
power line crossing is being conducted, from August 28, 2023, until
September 11, 2023.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121),

we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone encompassing the width of the Upper Mississippi River from
MM 476 to MM 477. It is categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual
023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket. For
instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0706 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T08-0706  Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River, Mile Markers
476-477, Davenport, IA.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: all navigable
waters within the Upper Mississippi River, Mile Markers (MM) 476-477.
    (b) Enforcement period. This section is subject to enforcement from
August 28, 2023 through September 11, 2023.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general safety zone
regulations in Sec.  165.23, entry of persons or vessels into the
safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited
unless authorized by the COTP or a designated representative. A
designated representative is a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
of the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) assigned to units under the operational
control of USCG Sector Upper Mississippi River.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or a designated
representative via VHF-FM channel 16, or through USCG Sector Upper
Mississippi River at<PHONE_NUMBER>. Persons and vessels permitted to
enter the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions
issued by the COTP or designated representative.
    (d) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public of the effective period for the
safety zone as well as any changes in the dates and times of
enforcement, as well as reductions in size or scope of the safety zone
as ice or flood conditions improve, through Local Notice to Mariners
(LNMs), Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs), and/or Safety Marine
Information Broadcast (SMIB) as appropriate.

    Dated: August 28, 2023.
D.J. Every,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Sector Upper
Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2023-18926 Filed 8-29-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: February 13, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 29)]
[Notices]
[Page 7280]
[DOCID:fr13fe09-95]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activity Seeking OMB Approval

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA invites public comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) revision of a current
information collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day
comment period soliciting comments on the following collection of
information was published on October 31, 2008, vol. 73, no. 212, page
65004. This collection is necessary in order to determine applicants'
qualifications for certification as an Aviation Medical Examiner (AME).

DATES: Please submit comments by March 16, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Mauney at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

    Title: Aviation Medical Examiner Program.
    Type of Request: Extension without change of a currently approved
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0604.
    Form(s): FAA Form 8520-2.
    Affected Public: An estimated 450 respondents.
    Frequency: This information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: Approximately 30 minutes per
response.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An estimated 225 hours annually.
    Abstract: This collection is necessary in order to determine
applicants' qualifications for certification as an Aviation Medical
Examiner (AME).

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs. Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of
Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to oira_
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20503.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimates of the burden of
the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.

Carla Mauney,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business
Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. E9-3008 Filed 2-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register: July 25, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 142)]
[Notices]
[Page 40848-40849]
[DOCID:fr25jy07-57]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

July 16, 2007.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC07-115-000
    Applicants: Iberdrola Energias Renovables S.A.U.
    Description: Iberdrola Energias Renovables SAU submits an
Application for order under Section 203(a)(1) of the FPA authorizing
disposition of Jurisdictional Facilities resulting from an initial
public offering & request for waivers.
    Filed Date: 07/13/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070716-0188.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 03, 2007.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER97-2801-018.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: Change in Status of PacifiCorp.
    Filed Date: 07/13/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070713-5022.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 03, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER00-2706-005; ER06-754-002; ER01-2760-004; ER01-
2066-005; ER02-963-007; ER98-4515-009; ER06-744-003; ER03-28-003; ER03-
398-010; ER01-1418-009; ER02-1238-009; ER99-3450-007; ER99-2769-008;
ER01-390-004; ER06-733-004.
    Applicants: Foote Creek IV, LLC; Auburndale Power Partners LP;
Ridge Crest Wind Partners, LLC; Allegheny Energy Supply Lincoln
Generation; Crete Energy Venture, LLC; Cadillac Renewable Energy LLC;
Sabine Cogen, LP; Walton County Power, LLC; Washington County Power,
LLC; Effingham County Power, LLC; MPC Generating, LLC; Foote Creek II,
LLC; Foote Creek III, LLC; Chandler Wind Partners, LLC; Midland
Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership.
    Description: ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC et al. submits this
notification of a change-in-status for Entities with Market-Based Rate
Authority.
    Filed Date: 07/11/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070713-0050.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 01, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER02-1330-008; ER03-358-003.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Calpine Corporation.
    Description: Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and Calpine Corporation
submit a Settlement Agreement re the Generator Special Facilities
Agreements and Generator Interconnection Agreements for Los Medanos
Energy Center, LLC.
    Filed Date: 07/05/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070712-0162.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 26, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-591-002.
    Applicants: Exel Power Sources, LLC.
    Description: Exel Power Sources, LLC submits a Petition for
Acceptance of Initial Tariff, Waivers and Blanket Authority etc.
    Filed Date: 07/11/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070713-0053.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 01, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-911-001.
    Applicants: RPL Holdings, LLC.
    Description: RPL Holdings, Inc submits this report on refunds with
respect to the delivery of test power from RPL Holdings 65 MW Facility
to the PJM Interconnection, LLC electricity market.
    Filed Date: 07/11/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070713-0055.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 01, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-939-001.

    Applicants: Columbia Utilities Power, LLC.
    Description: Columbia Utilities Power, LLC submits an amendment to
its petition for acceptance of initial rate filing.
    Filed Date: 07/12/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070716-0184.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 02, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-959-001.
    Applicants: Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative, Inc. amends its
May 30, 2007 Filing by submitting First Revised Sheet 1 to FERC
Electric Tariff, First Revised Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 07/10/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070712-0174.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, July 31, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-960-001.
    Applicants: Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative, Inc. amends its
May 30, 2007 Filing of the Wholesale Distribution Service Agreement
with Tower Kleber Limited Partnership.
    Filed Date: 07/10/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070712-0175.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, July 31, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1031-001.
    Applicants: KeyTex Energy LLC.
    Description: KeyTex Energy LLC submits an amendment to its June 13,
2007, Petition for Acceptance of Initial Rate Schedule, Waivers and
Blanket Authority.
    Filed Date: 07/11/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070713-0054.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 01, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1090-001.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits a corrected version
of its Wholesale Market Participation Agreement.
    Filed Date: 07/10/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070711-0033.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, July 31, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1142-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Arizona Public Service Company submits revisions to
their Open Access Transmission Tariff.
    Filed Date: 07/10/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070712-0179.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, July 31, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1143-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits revised
rate sheets to the Expedited Service and Interconnection Agreement with
Wintec Energy LTD designated as Service Agreement 28.
    Filed Date: 07/13/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070716-0186.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 03, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1144-000.
    Applicants: American Transmission Company LLC and Midwest
Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: American Transmission Co. LLC et al. submits the
proposed Attachment FF-ATCLLC to its Open Access Transmission and
Energy Market Tariff.
    Filed Date: 07/11/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070713-0056.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 01, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1145-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Services, Inc.
    Description: Entergy Services, Inc., agent for Entergy Arkansas,
Inc. et al., submits revisions to the Interconnection and Operating
Agreement with Mississippi Delta Energy Agency.
    Filed Date: 07/11/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070713-0057.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 01, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1147-000.
    Applicants: American Electric Power Service Corporation.
    Description: American Electric Power Service Corporation, agent for
Indiana Michigan Power Company, submits an executed Letter Agreement 2
w/Michigan Electric Transmission Company dated 7/2/07.
    Filed Date: 07/13/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070716-0185.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 03, 2007.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following foreign
utility company status filings:
    Docket Numbers: FC07-53-000.
    Applicants: Transportista Electrica Centroamericana.
    Description: Foreign Utility Company Notice of Self-Certification.
    Filed Date: 07/11/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070711-5041.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 01, 2007.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-14309 Filed 7-24-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 82 (Thursday, April 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25234-25235]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09125]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 8936-000]

Far West Power Corporation; Notice of Authorization for Continued
Project Operation

    The Power Canal Hydroelectric Project is located on the tailrace
canal of Pacific Gas and Electric Company's (PG&E) existing Potter
Valley Project No. 77, on the East Fork Russian River, in Mendocino
County, California. The license for Project No. 8936 was issued for a
period ending April 14, 2022.
    Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires the
Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year-to-
year an annual license to the then licensee(s) under the terms and
conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the
project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other
applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior license waived
the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b)
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth
at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the
Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project
has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations
until the Commission issues someone else a license for the project or
otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 8936 is issued to
the Far West Power Corporation for a period effective April 15, 2022
through April 14, 2023 or until the issuance of a new license for the
project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If
issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place on
or before April 14, 2023, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18
CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the

FPA is renewed automatically without further order or notice by the
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is
hereby given that the Far West Power Corporation is authorized to
continue operation of the Power Canal Hydroelectric Project, until such
time as the Commission orders disposition of the project.

    Dated: April 22, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-09125 Filed 4-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 152 (Thursday, August 6, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47794-47796]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17197]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0312]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Extralabel Drug Use in Animals

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection
of certain information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on reporting requirements
associated with extralabel drug use in animals.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by October 5, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. Electronic comments
must be submitted on or before October 5, 2020. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of October 5, 2020. Comments
received by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions)
will be considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or before that date.

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or

confidential business information, such as a manufacturing process.
Please note that if you include your name, contact information, or
other information that identifies you in the body of your comments,
that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2008-N-0312 for ``Agency Information Collection Activities;
Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extralabel Drug Use in Animals.''
Received comments, those filed in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will
be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as
``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JonnaLynn Capezzuto, Office of
Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-
12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Extralabel Drug Use for Animals--21 CFR 530

OMB Control Number 0910-0325--Extension

    The Animal Medicinal Drug Use Clarification Act of 1994 (Pub. L.
103-396) allows a veterinarian to prescribe the extralabel use of
approved new animal drugs. Also, it permits FDA, if it finds that there
is a reasonable probability that the extralabel use of an animal drug
may prevent the risk to the public health, to establish a safe level
for a residue from the extralabel use of the drug, and to require the
development of an analytical method for the detection of residues above
that established safe level (21 CFR 530.22(b)). Although to date, we
have not established a safe level for a residue from the extralabel use
of any new animal drug and, therefore, have not required the
development of analytical methodology, we believe that there may be
instances when analytical methodology will be required. We are,
therefore, estimating the reporting burden based on two methods being
required annually. The requirement to establish an analytical method
may be fulfilled by any interested person. We believe that the sponsor
of the drug will be willing to develop the method in most cases.
Alternatively, FDA, the sponsor, and perhaps a third party may
cooperatively arrange for method development. The respondents may be
sponsors of new animal drugs; State, Federal, and/or State Agencies;
academia; or individuals.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                     Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of
                            21 CFR Part                                 Number of      responses per     Total annual    Average burden    Total hours
                                                                       respondents       respondent       responses       per response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
530.22(b); Submission(s) of Analytical Method......................               2                1                2            4,160            8,320
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    Based on a review of the information collection since our last
request for OMB approval, we have made no adjustments to our burden
estimate.

    Dated: July 31, 2020.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-17197 Filed 8-5-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: October 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 204)]
[Notices]
[Page 65310-65311]
[DOCID:fr22oc10-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP11-1-000]

Pine Prairie Energy Center, LLC; Notice of Application

October 15, 2010.
    Take notice that on October 4, 2010, Pine Prairie Energy Center,
LLC (Pine Prairie), 333 Clay Street, Suite 1500, Houston, TX 77002
filed an application in Docket No. CP11-1-000 pursuant to Section 7(c)
of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part 157 of the Commission's
Regulations, for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to
construct and operate its Phase III Expansion Project. Pine Prairie's
Phase III Expansion Project would expand upon its existing storage
facilities located in Evangeline Parish, Louisiana. Specifically, Pine
Prairie would: (i) Construct two additional natural gas storage
caverns, each having a working gas capacity of 12.0 billion cubic feet
(Bcf), bringing the total number of caverns at the facility to seven;
(ii) increase the working gas capacity of four of the five authorized
natural gas storage caverns from 10 Bcf to 12 Bcf; (iii) restate the
total capacity of Cavern No. 1 as being 10.2 Bcf to reflect an increase
in the quantity of base gas to be maintained in that cavern from 1.6
Bcf to 2.2 Bcf; (iv) construct extensions of the existing storage
facility piping in order to connect the proposed caverns to Pine
Prairie's existing systems; (v) construct approximately 2.50 miles of
24, 20, and 16-inch diameter leaching pipeline looping and related
enhancements; (vi) install two incremental electric drive compressor
units totaling 11,500 horsepower; and (vii) increase the authorized
maximum daily receipt and delivery capacities at interconnections with
two interstate pipelines from 600 MMcf/day to 900 MMcf/day, all as
described in more detail in the application which is on file with the
Commission and open for public inspection.
    Pine Prairie states that the Phase III Expansion Project will
increase the Pine Prairie Energy Center's total working gas capacity to
80 Bcf, supported by base gas capacity of 22.6 Bcf (for a total storage
capacity of 102.6 Bcf). Pine Prairie also requests a reaffirmation of
the previously granted authorization to charge market-based rates for
its storage and hub services.
    This filing is available for review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://
www.ferc.gov using the ``e-Library'' link. Enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for
TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Any questions concerning this Application may be
directed to James F. Bowe, Jr., Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP, 1101 New York
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20005,<PHONE_NUMBER> (phone)<PHONE_NUMBER>
(fax<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either complete
its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the Commission's
public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below file with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426, a motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 14 copies of filings made in the proceeding with the Commission
and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other party. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    Protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the
Internet in lieu of paper; see, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link.
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings.
    Comment Date: November 5, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26687 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18699-18702]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06615]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2020-0522; FRL-9666-02-R3]

Air Plan Approval; Delaware; Amendments To Control of Volatile
Organic Compounds Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing Rule
Regulation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a state
implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Delaware Department
of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC). This SIP
revision consists of the 2010 amendments to the State of Delaware's
Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing (MERR) regulations to
incorporate the Ozone Transport Commission's (OTC) 2009 Motor Vehicle
and Mobile Equipment Non-Assembly Line Coating Operations regulations
(MVMERR) model rule. The MVMERR rule establishes updated volatile
organic compounds (VOC) content limits for coating and cleaning
solvents used in vehicle refinishing and standards for coating
application, work practices, monitoring, and recordkeeping. EPA is
approving these revisions to the Delaware SIP in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: This final rule is effective on May 2, 2022.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2020-0522. All documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through
https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Silverman, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air & Radiation Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650

Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone number is
(215) 814-5511. Mr. Silverman can also be reached via electronic mail
at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On February 8, 2021 (86 FR 8561), EPA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for the State of Delaware. In the NPRM, EPA
proposed approval of a formal SIP Revision submitted on May 6, 2020 on
behalf of the State of Delaware by DNREC.
    Ozone is formed in the atmosphere by photochemical reactions
between VOCs and nitrogen oxides (NOX) in the presence of
sunlight. In order to reduce these ozone concentrations, the CAA
requires control of certain VOC and NOX emission sources to
achieve emission reductions in ozone nonattainment areas classified as
Moderate and above. The 2002 MERR Model Rule was developed to reduce
VOC emissions from automotive coatings and cleaning solvents associated
with non-assembly line refinishing or recoating of motor vehicles,
mobile equipment, and their associated parts and components. This rule
was originally approved by EPA into Delaware's SIP on November 22, 2002
(67 FR 70315) as part of a regional effort to attain and maintain the
1-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).
    The OTC 2009 MVMERR Model Rule \1\ is a revision of the 2002 MERR
Model Rule developed by the OTC. The OTC's 2009 MVMERR Model Rule is
based upon the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) Suggested
Control Measure (SCM) for Automotive Coatings, published October 2005.
In order to keep Delaware's regulations up to date with the OTC's 2009
MVMERR Model Rule, Delaware revised its regulations, found at 7 Del.
Admin. Code 1124, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions;
Section 11.0 Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing (Delaware's 2010
amended MERR rule), on September 17, 2010. Delaware then submitted
these 2010 amendments to EPA as a SIP revision on May 6, 2020.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The OTC 2009 MVMERR Model Rule is available online at
https://otcair.org/document.asp?fview=modelrules and included in the
docket for this rulemaking, available online at https://www.regulations.gov, Docket ID: EPA-R03-OAR-2020-0522.
    \2\ During a recent internal review of the Delaware SIP, DNREC
discovered that it had never submitted the 2010 Delaware regulatory
changes adopting the 2009 OTC MVMERR Model Rule to EPA as a SIP
revision. DNREC therefore submitted this SIP revision in May 2020 so
that the EPA-approved SIP would correctly reflect the Delaware
regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis

    EPA has reviewed Delaware's May 6, 2020 MERR SIP submittal in the
context of the requirements of CAA Sections 176a and 184 (interstate
transport commissions and control of interstate ozone air pollution
respectively). Delaware has amended 7 Del. Admin. Code 1124 Control of
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions Section 11.0 Mobile Equipment
Repair and Refinishing to meet these requirements in its May 6, 2020
MERR SIP submittal. In this action, EPA is determining that the
submitted MERR SIP meets the above-cited requirements of the CAA.
    Other specific requirements of Delaware's May 6, 2020 submittal and
the rationale for EPA's proposed action are explained in the NPRM, and
will not be restated here.

III. EPA's Response to Comments Received

    EPA received five sets of comments in response to the NPRM that are
available in the docket for this action. Of these five sets of
comments, one was outside of the scope of this rulemaking, and another
was supportive, neither of which require a response by EPA. EPA
provides summaries of the three sets of significant adverse comments
and our responses below.
    Comment 1: One commenter claims that the DE MERR Rule should be
disapproved due to rounding error that results from converting the
regulatory VOC limits from pounds per gallon (lb/gal) to grams per
liter (gm/l) and vice versa. The commenter uses the example that
converting ``5.5 pounds per gallon to grams per liter we get 659.045
grams per liter'' and converting ``660 grams per liter to pounds per
gallon we get 5.50797 pounds per gallon.'' The commenter goes on to say
``allowing these fractional amounts to be rounded off EPA is deceiving
the public and allowing harmful VOC compounds to be emitted into the
atmosphere. EPA can't allow duel [sic] limits in different units unless
those units of measure are exactly equal.''
    Response 1: EPA does not agree that the SIP revision should be
disapproved due to minor discrepancies that arise in table 11-1 which
converts imperial units to metric units. The SIP revision explicitly
defines the VOC Coating Regulatory content in equation 11-1 and states
that units are in gm/l. Furthermore, certain EPA regulations also give
limits in both imperial and metric units. Examples can be found in
EPA's New Source Performance Standards (Standards of Performance for
Electric Utility Steam Generating Units, 40 CFR part 60 subpart Da) and
National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Surface
Coating of Metal Furniture: National Emission Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants, 40 CFR part 63 subpart RRRR). In these examples and in
this SIP revision, these limits would be better conceived of as a limit
defined by a range of possible compliant concentrations with any
concentrations within the range (whether measured in imperial or SI
units) representing compliance, rather than ``duel [sic] limits.''
However, in all cases the limits in Delaware's MERR are more stringent
than the corresponding limits in the current SIP. This SIP revision is
therefore approvable because it increases the stringency of the
Delaware SIP.
    Comment 2: The commenter asserts that EPA cannot approve the DE
MERR rule on grounds that it ``has yet to approve previous fixes to the
same rule which address impermissible Startup Shutdowns and
Malfunctions as detailed in EPA's 2015 SIP call.'' The commenter
asserts that ``EPA must address the impermissible exceptions detailed
in the SIP call for Rule 1124 before it adds new rules to the SIP
otherwise these new rules can just be ignored in the same way. . . .''
    Response 2: The commenter asserts that EPA must resolve issues
relating to Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) as described in
the 2015 SIP call (80 FR 33840, June 12, 2015) before it can modify
regulations pertaining to Delaware's MERR. The commenter correctly
notes that an SSM provision subject to the 2015 SIP call is contained
in Title 7 of the Delaware Administrative Code, Regulation 1124
(Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions), Section 1.0 (General
Provisions), subsection 1.4. 7 Del. Admin. Code Section 1124-1.4. This
SSM subsection is not addressed in this rule. This rule pertains solely
to revisions to Delaware Code section 11.0 (and its various
subsections), and comprises SIP-strengthening changes to Delaware's
rules that pertain to ``Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing.''
Revisions to address the SSM provision in 7 Del. Admin. Code Section
1124-1.4 have been submitted to EPA and will be addressed in a separate
action.
    It is worth noting the commenter does not articulate any reason why
EPA must address the SSM provision before EPA can act on this SIP
revision beyond drawing an analogy to hypothetical traffic regulations,
and EPA does not know of any policy or legal reason why

we need to await resolution of an SSM provision contained in a
different subsection of the same regulatory chapter prior to taking
action on these SIP-strengthening measures.
    The updates to the MERR rule in 7 Del. Admin. Code Section 1124-11
contain no SSM provisions or changes relating to SSM. Nothing in 7 Del.
Admin. Code Section 1124-11 was subject to the 2015 SIP call cited by
the commenter. Furthermore, the approval of the MERR provisions in 7
Del. Admin. Code Section 1124-11 will be SIP strengthening independent
of the outcome of action pertaining to 7 Del. Admin. Code Section 1124-
1.4. The new SIP strengthening requirements Delaware added to section
11 include reduced VOC coating contents, specifications for the type of
equipment that can be used for application techniques and the addition
of requirements to document the manufacturer and VOC content of
coatings. EPA believes that delaying the federal enforceability of
these benefits through SIP approval of the MERR rule revisions will
delay potential environmental benefits of having the strengthened
provisions in the SIP. EPA therefore does not view this comment as a
basis to alter the proposed action and is finalizing approval of the
MERR as a revision to the Delaware SIP.
    Comment 3: The commenter asserts EPA cannot approve this SIP
because this regulation will increase the cost for businesses in
Delaware resulting from ``increased chemical use by some companies that
are not located in Delaware, thereby driving up costs for Delaware
businesses, which must bear the cost of treating the chemicals . . .''
The commenter goes on to suggest that the resulting cost outweighs the
benefits.
    Response 3: EPA disagrees that the MERR SIP Revision should be
disapproved based on the reasons given by the commenter. Although the
commenter speculates that the SIP revision will result in ``increased
chemical use by some companies that are not located in Delaware,
thereby driving up costs for Delaware businesses, which must bear the
cost of treating the chemicals'' the commenter does not offer any
factual support for or data to back up this assertion. Comments that
are no more than broad assertions that an agency ``got it wrong'' do
not provide a basis for EPA to change its decision. See, e.g.,
International Fabricare Institute v. E.P.A., 972 F.2d 384 (D.C. Cir.
1992). Furthermore, this SIP revision in no way impacts treatment of
materials, so the mechanism suggested by the commenter for driving up
costs is unrelated to the revisions as written. Therefore, EPA
disagrees with the commenter that this comment provides a basis for
disapproving this SIP Revision.

IV. Final Action

    EPA is approving the 2010 amended MERR rule as a revision to the
Delaware SIP. EPA has determined that Delaware's 2010 amended MERR rule
is consistent with the requirements and limits in the 2009 OTC MVMERR
Model Rule. Therefore, its approval into the Delaware SIP would result
in the VOC reductions in the 2010 amended MERR rule becoming federally
enforceable and strengthen the SIP.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of revisions to
7 Del Admin. Code 1124 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions
Section 11.0 Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials generally available through https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region III Office (please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information). Therefore, these materials have
been approved by EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated
by reference by EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable
under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the
final rule of EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference in
the next update to the SIP compilation.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and

the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until
60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is
not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by May 31, 2022. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action.
    This action pertaining to revisions to 7 Del. Admin. Code 1124
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions Section 11.0 Mobile
Equipment Repair and Refinishing may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: March 23, 2022.
Diana Esher,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart I--Delaware

0
2. In Sec.  52.420, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry ``Section 11.0'' under ``1124 Control of Volatile Organic
Compound Emissions'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.420   Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                State
 State regulation  (7 DNREC 1100)       Title/subject         effective      EPA approval date      Additional
                                                                date                                explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               1124 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
Section 11.0......................  Mobile Equipment           10/11/2010  3/31/2022, [insert
                                     Repair and                             Federal Register
                                     Refinishing.                           citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-06615 Filed 3-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


MEMORANDUM

DATE:		November 24, 2014

TO:		Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR - 2013-0602

FROM:	Region 7, EPA

SUBJECT:	July 14, 2014, Meeting Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY

      Karl Brooks and Ward Burns of EPA gave a summary presentation on July 14, 2014, to the Utilities State Government Organization (USGO).  The majority of the presentation centered on highlighting the four major building blocks in the Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.        ATTENDEES

EPA Region 7: Karl Brooks Ward Burns

Other Attendees included members of Utilities State Government Organization- attendee list not available.