[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 124 (Thursday, June 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42114-42116]
[FR Doc No: 2023-13791]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-97789; File No. SR-ICEEU-2023-016]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Europe Limited; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating
to Amendments FTSE 100 Index Contracts and SARON Futures Contracts

June 22, 2023.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 9, 2023, ICE Clear Europe Limited filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule changes
described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared
by ICE Clear Europe. ICE Clear Europe filed the proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder,\4\ such that the proposed rule change was immediately
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the
Proposed Rule Change

    ICE Clear Europe Limited (``ICE Clear Europe'' or the ``Clearing
House'') proposes to amend certain clearing transaction fees for FTSE
100 index contracts and SARON futures contracts (the ``Contracts'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the
meanings specified in the IFEU Equity Index Contracts and SARON
Futures or, if not defined therein, the ICE Clear Europe Clearing
Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, ICE Clear Europe included
statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule
change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule
change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places
specified in Item IV below. ICE Clear Europe has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections (A), (B), and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.

(A) Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change

(a) Purpose
    ICE Clear Europe is proposing to increase certain clearing fees for
specified ICE Futures Europe (``IFEU'') contracts, specifically the ICE
Futures Europe FTSE 100 Futures and Options Contracts, FTSE 100
Dividend Index Futures Contracts (collectively the ``Equity Index
Contracts'') and Three-Month SARON[supreg] Index Futures Contracts (the
``SARON Futures.'') The proposed fee changes are set forth in the
following tables:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Existing      Proposed new
                                           clearing fee    clearing fee
                                             ([pound]/       ([pound]/
                                             contract)       contract)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             CONTRACT--FTSE 100 Futures and Options Contract
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outrights/Basis.........................            0.24            0.27
Block...................................            0.29            0.33
Block with Delayed Publication..........            0.33            0.35
Cash Settlement fee (Futures)...........            0.35            0.40
Exercise/Assignment fee (Options).......            0.35            0.40
Block fee cap (Options).................           2,080           2,350
Block fee cap with Delayed Publication             2,800           3,100
 (Options)..............................
Exercise/Assignment fee cap (Options)...           2,400           2,700
FTSE 100 Trade at Index Close Published.            0.28            0.31
FTSE 100 Trade at Index Close Delayed               0.35            0.38
 Published..............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           CONTRACT--FTSE 100 Dividend Index Futures Contract
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outrights/Basis.........................            0.24            0.27
Block...................................            0.29            0.33
Block with Delayed Publication..........            0.33            0.35
Cash Settlement fee.....................            0.35            0.40
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      CONTRACT--SARON Index Futures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outrights/Basis.........................            0.40            0.48
Block...................................            0.40            0.48
Block with Delayed Publication..........            0.56            0.68
Cash Settlement fee.....................            0.50            0.60
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed fee changes are intended to become operative on July
1, 2023, subject to regulatory approval.
    The proposed increases in clearing fees for the Equity Index
Contracts are intended to provide additional revenue to support the
ongoing investments by ICE Clear Europe in developing clearing for
derivative products on FTSE indexes, including the Equity Index
Contracts. The amendments are also intended to bring fees into line
with the fees of similar equity index contracts traded on other
European exchanges, which have increased in 2023.
    The proposed increases in fees for SARON Futures are intended to
provide additional revenue to support ongoing clearing of the SARON
Futures, including to support marketing and business development
efforts relating to Swiss franc denominated interest rate derivatives
in light of the continued evolution of European markets as a result of
ongoing regulatory changes under EU law and other factors.

    The amendments to the fees for both Equity Index Contracts and
SARON Futures will also generally provide additional revenue to support
Clearing House investments that enhance the services provided to market
participants, including through new clearing technology to augment the
existing clearing platform, reduce systems risk, and add additional
regulatory reporting related to MIFID and other regulations. Fee
increases also reflect the current inflationary macroeconomic
environment.
(b) Statutory Basis
    ICE Clear Europe believes that the proposed fee amendments for the
Equity Index Contracts and SARON Futures are consistent with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act \6\ and the regulations
thereunder applicable to it. In particular, Section 17A(b)(3)(D) of the
Act \7\ requires that ``[t]he rules of the clearing agency provide for
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among its participants.'' ICE Clear Europe believes that its clearing
fees, as proposed to be amended, would be reasonable and appropriate
for the Contracts. ICE Clear Europe's fees are imposed at the product
level on a per transaction basis (as are the applicable exchange fees),
and would be generally applicable to market participants trading in the
contracts. ICE Clear Europe has determined that the increased clearing
fees are appropriate to support continued investments in clearing
operations. Specifically, the increased fees for the Equity Index
Contracts would support ongoing development of clearing of derivatives
on FTSE indices, and will be consistent with fees for other contract
for similar equity index futures contracts traded on other exchanges.
The increased fees for the SARON Futures would facilitate ongoing
market and business development with respect to that contract. ICE
Clear Europe has further determined that the increased fees would be
commensurate with the size and nature of the contracts and would
provide an appropriate balance between the costs of clearing for market
participants and the expenses incurred by ICE Clear Europe in offering
clearing of the relevant contracts, taking into account the investments
ICE Clear Europe has made and will continue to make in clearing such
products. As such, in ICE Clear Europe's view, the amendments are
consistent with the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its Clearing Members and other market participants,
within the meaning of Section 17A(b)(3)(D) of the Act.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(D).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed amendments are also consistent with the requirements
of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \9\ which requires, among other
things, that the ``rules of a clearing agency [. . .] are not designed
to permit unfair discrimination in the admission of participants or
among participants in the use of the clearing agency.'' As noted above,
the proposed fee changes for the Contracts would apply on a per
transaction basis and would apply to Clearing Members and market
participants generally. As a result, the amendments would not result in
any unfair discrimination among Clearing Members in their use of the
Clearing House, within the meaning of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the
Act.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Clearing Agency's Statement on Burden on Competition

    ICE Clear Europe does not believe the proposed amendments would
have any impact, or impose any burden, on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Although ICE is
increasing certain clearing fees, as set forth herein, it believes such
changes are appropriate to reflect the costs and expenses incurred by
the Clearing House and to support continued investment in its
operations and infrastructure to support clearing activities for these
and other contracts. Further, as discussed above, because fees are
imposed on a per transaction basis at the product level, the revised
fees would be applied equally to all Clearing Members and other market
participants who transact in the Contracts. ICE does not believe that
the amendments would adversely affect the ability of such Clearing
Members or other market participants generally to access clearing
services for the Contracts. Further, since the revised fees will apply
to market participants generally, ICE believes that the amendments
would not otherwise affect competition among Clearing Members,
adversely affect the market for clearing services or limit market
participants' choices for obtaining clearing services. Accordingly, ICE
Clear Europe does not believe that the amendments would impose any
impact or burden on competition that is not appropriate in furtherance
of the purpose of the Act.

(C) Clearing Agency's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change
Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments relating to the proposed amendment have not been
solicited or received by ICE Clear Europe. ICE Clear Europe will notify
the Commission of any written comments received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change, Security-Based
Swap Submission and Advance Notice and Timing for Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \12\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml) or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-ICEEU-2023-016 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-ICEEU-2023-016. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written

communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
such filings will also be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of ICE Clear Europe and on ICE Clear Europe's website
at https://www.theice.com/clear-europe/regulation.
    Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICEEU-2023-016 and
should be submitted on or before July 20, 2023.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-13791 Filed 6-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8323-8325]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03495]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-9519; Product Identifier 2016-NM-099-AD; Amendment
39-19200; AD 2018-04-05]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A319-112, A319-115, A320-214, A320-232, and A321-211
airplanes. This AD was prompted by in-service experience and further
analysis, which showed that the galley 5 without kick-load retainers,
was unable to withstand the expected loading during several flight
phases or in case of emergency landing. This AD requires modification
of galley 5 trolley compartments by adding kick-load retainers. We are
issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective April 3, 2018.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of April 3,
2018.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax
+33 5 61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; internet
http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th Street, Des
Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9519.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9519; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone
800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 206-
231-3398.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to
amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Airbus
Model A319-112, A319-115, A320-214, A320-232, and A321-211 airplanes.
The SNPRM published in the Federal Register on November 9, 2017 (82 FR
52022) (``the SNPRM''). We preceded the SNPRM with a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) that published in the Federal Register on January 3,
2017 (82 FR 50) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by in-service
experience and further analysis, which showed that the galley 5 without
kick-load retainers was unable to withstand the expected loading during
several flight phases or in case of an emergency landing. The NPRM
proposed to require modification of galley 5 trolley compartments by
adding kick-load retainers. The SNPRM proposed to modify the
applicability. We are issuing this AD to prevent galley/trolley
detachment and collapse into an adjacent cabin aisle or cabin zone,
possibly spreading loose galley equipment items, compartment doors, or
leaking fluids. These hazards could block an evacuation route and
result in injury to crew or passengers.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2016-0040, dated March 2, 2016 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Airbus Model
A319-112, A319-115, A320-214, A320-232, and A321-211 airplanes. The
MCAI states:

    Following in-service experience and further analyses, it was
ascertained that the galley 5 without kick load retainers on
external position could not withstand the expected loading during
several flight phases or in case of emergency landing.

    This condition, if not corrected, could lead to galley/trolley
detachment and collapse into an adjacent cabin aisle or cabin zone,
possibly spreading loose galley equipment items, compartment doors
or leaking fluids, blocking an evacuation route, and consequently
resulting in injury to crew or passengers.
    To address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus issued 6
Service Bulletins (SB) to provide modification instructions for the
affected aeroplanes.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires
modification of galley 5 trolley compartments to install kick load
retainers.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9519.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the SNPRM and
the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Change the Applicability To Be Based on Galley 5 Part and
Serial Number

    Etihad Airways (Etihad) requested that the applicability of the
proposed AD (in the SNPRM) be changed to list specific galley 5 part
numbers and serial numbers. Etihad noted that the same galley 5 part
number installed on the airplanes listed in the applicability of the
proposed AD (in the SNPRM) was also installed on certain Model A320-232
airplanes under supplemental type certificates (STCs). Etihad noted
that the proposed change would help to ensure all affected parts are
addressed.
    We disagree with the commenter's request. We appreciate Etihad's
initiative in attempting to address the unsafe condition on their
fleet, including airplanes modified by STCs or other approved
installation methods. However, making the requested change would
require us to issue another supplemental NPRM, delaying the issuance of
a final rule. To delay this action would be inappropriate, since we
have determined that an unsafe condition exists and that galley
modifications must be made to ensure continued safety. We will consider
additional rulemaking to address airplanes modified by STCs. We have
not changed this AD in this regard.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
SNPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the SNPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A320-25-1B29, dated June 19,
2014; and Service Bulletin A320-25-1B30, dated June 19, 2014. This
service information describes procedures for installing kick-load
retainers on certain galley 5 trolley compartments. These documents are
distinct since they apply to different airplane configurations. This
service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 19 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification..........................  2 work-hours x $85 per                $0            $170          $3,230
                                         hour = $170.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to
the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2018-04-05 Airbus: Amendment 39-19200; Docket No. FAA-2016-9519;
Product Identifier 2016-NM-099-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective April 3, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus Model A319-112, A319-115, A320-214,
A320-232, and A321-211 airplanes, certificated in any category,
manufacturer's serial numbers 1479, 3096, 3693, 3713, 3739, 3791,
3896, 3902, 3907, 3931, 3949, 3969, 4030, 4045, 4049, 4059, 4066,
4077, 4083, 4124, 4146, 4158, 4188, 4198, 4206, 4209, 4218, 4235,
4255, 4264, 4304, 4321, 4371, 4374, 4395, 4411, 4417, 4431, 4485,
4492, 4502, 4528, 4541, 4548, 4592, 4595, 4638, 4651, 4669, 4703,
4724, 4737, 4746, 4770, 4780, 4783, 4826, 4827, 4860, 4863, 4865,
4902, 4934, 4945, 4951, 4952, 4971, 4996, 5023, 5029, 5042, 5088,
5095, 5132, 5159, 5164, 5171, 5175, 5192, 5210, 5227, 5241, 5247,
5251, 5275, 5277, 5297, 5306, 5340, 5343, 5348, 5356, 5366, 5370,
5385, 5387, 5392, 5396, 5400, 5407, 5418, 5427, 5438, 5456, 5458,
5469, 5495, 5517, 5555, 5624, 5674, 5678, 5698, 5699, 5704, 5709,
5714, 5791, 5745, 5753, 5761, 5781, 5786, 5788, 5789, 5798, 5804,
5810, 5821, 5827, 5842, 5874, 5882, 5889, 5903, 5907, 5916, 5924,
5958, 5984, 5994, 6000, 6004, 6054, 6080, 6107, 6166, 6176, 6234,
6266, 6293, 6335, 6344, 6365, 6430, and 6444.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25, Equipment/
furnishings.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by in-service experience and further
analysis, which showed that the galley 5 without kick-load retainers
was unable to withstand the expected loading during several flight
phases or in case of emergency landing. We are issuing this AD to
prevent galley/trolley detachment and collapse into an adjacent
cabin aisle or cabin zone, possibly spreading loose galley equipment
items, compartment doors, or leaking fluids. These hazards could
block an evacuation route and result in injury to crew or
passengers.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Install Kick-Load Retainers

    Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, install
kick-load retainers on the galley 5 trolley compartments as
specified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD, as
applicable. For airplanes on which galley 5 is not installed, no
action is required by this paragraph.
    (1) For Airbus Model A319-115 airplanes, manufacturer's serial
numbers 5678, 5698, 5704, 5745, 5753, 5761, 5781, 5786, 5788, 5789,
5798, 5810, 5827, and 5842, do the installation in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-
1B29, dated June 19, 2014.
    (2) For Airbus Model A320-232 airplanes, manufacturer's serial
numbers 5458, 5517, 5624, and 5804, do the installation in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-25-1B30, dated June 19, 2014.
    (3) For airplanes not identified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2)
of this AD, do the installation using a method approved by the
Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or
the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA
Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the
approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(i) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2016-0040, dated March 2, 2016,
for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on
the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2016-9519.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Sanjay Ralhan,
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-1B29, dated June 19, 2014.
    (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-1B30, dated June 19, 2014.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; internet http://www.airbus.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on February 9, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-03495 Filed 2-26-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 17, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73268-73269]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25440]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

    The following notice of meeting is published pursuant to section
3(a) of the government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. 94-409), 5 U.S.C.
552b:

Agency Holding Meeting: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

TIME AND DATE: November 19, 2020, 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Open to the public via audio Webcast only.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Join FERC online to listen live at http://ferc.capitolconnection.org/.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Agenda. *Note--Items listed on the agenda may
be deleted without further notice.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For a recorded message listing items struck from or added to the
meeting, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    This is a list of matters to be considered by the Commission. It
does not include a listing of all documents relevant to the items on
the agenda. All public documents, however, may be viewed on line at the
Commission's website at http://ferc.capitolconnection.org/ using the
eLibrary link.

                                          1072nd--Meeting, Open Meeting
                                         [November 19, 2020, 10:00 a.m.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Item No.                           Docket No.                           Company
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Administrative
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-1.....................................  AD21-1-000.................  Agency Administrative Matters.
A-2.....................................  AD21-2-000.................  Customer Matters, Reliability, Security
                                                                        and Market Operations.
A-3.....................................  AD07-13-014................  FY2020 Report on Enforcement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Electric
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E-1.....................................  RM20-16-000................  Managing Transmission Line Ratings.
E-2.....................................  RM19-15-001................  Qualifying Facility Rates and
                                                                        Requirements.
                                          AD16-16-001................  Implementation Issues Under the Public
                                                                        Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978.
E-3.....................................  EL14-12-015................  Association of Businesses Advocating
                                                                        Tariff Equity, Coalition of MISO
                                                                        Transmission Customers, Illinois
                                                                        Industrial Energy Consumers, Indiana
                                                                        Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc.,
                                                                        Minnesota Large Industrial Group, and
                                                                        Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group v.
                                                                        Midcontinent Independent System
                                                                        Operator, Inc., ALLETE, Inc., Ameren
                                                                        Illinois Company, Ameren Missouri,
                                                                        Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois,
                                                                        American Transmission Company LLC, Cleco
                                                                        Power LLC, Duke Energy Business
                                                                        Services, LLC, Entergy Arkansas, Inc.,
                                                                        Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, LLC,
                                                                        Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy
                                                                        Mississippi, Inc., Entergy New Orleans,
                                                                        Inc., Entergy Texas, Inc., Indianapolis
                                                                        Power & Light Company, International
                                                                        Transmission Company, ITC Midwest LLC,
                                                                        Michigan Electric Transmission Company,
                                                                        LLC, MidAmerican Energy Company, Montana-
                                                                        Dakota Utilities Co., Northen Indiana
                                                                        Public Service Company, Northern States
                                                                        Power Company-Minnesota, Northern States
                                                                        Power Company-Wisconsin, Otter Tail
                                                                        Power Company, and Southern Indiana Gas
                                                                        & Electric Company.

                                          EL15-45-014................  Arkansas Electric Cooperative
                                                                        Corporation, Mississippi Delta Energy
                                                                        Agency, Clarksdale Public Utilities
                                                                        Commission, Public Service Commission of
                                                                        Yazoo City, and Hoosier Energy Rural
                                                                        Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ALLETE,
                                                                        Inc., Ameren Illinois Company, Ameren
                                                                        Missouri, Ameren Transmssion Company of
                                                                        Illinois, American Transmission Company
                                                                        LLC, Cleco Power LLC, Duke Energy
                                                                        Business Services, LLC, Entergy
                                                                        Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States
                                                                        Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Louisiana, LLC,
                                                                        Entergy Mississippi, Inc., Entergy New
                                                                        Orleans, Inc., Entergy Texas, Inc.,
                                                                        Indianapolis Power & Light Company,
                                                                        International Transmission Company, ITC
                                                                        Midwest LLC, Michigan Electric
                                                                        Transmission Company, LLC, MidAmerican
                                                                        Energy Company, Montana-Dakota Utilities
                                                                        Co., Northern Indiana Public Service
                                                                        Company, Northern States Power Company-
                                                                        Minnesota, Northern States Power Company-
                                                                        Wisconsin, Otter Tail Power Company, and
                                                                        Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Company.
E-4.....................................  ER20-850-000...............  Bulb US LLC.
                                          ER20-851-000...............  Bulb Energy US Inc.
E-5.....................................  ER20-2890-000..............  California Independent System Operator
                                                                        Corporation.
E-6.....................................  EL20-39-000................  Avista Corporation.
                                          ER20-2347-000..............
E-7.....................................  ER20-841-001...............  Appalachian Power Company.
                                                                       PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
E-8.....................................  ER18-2497-002..............  Lawrenceburg Power, LLC.
E-9.....................................  ER19-229-001...............  Allegheny Ridge Wind Farm, LLC.
E-10....................................  ER20-1901-000..............  Midcontinent Independent System Operator,
                                                                        Inc.
E-11....................................  ER19-2846-002..............  Trans Bay Cable LLC.
E-12....................................  ER20-2435-000..............  Smoky Mountain Transmission LLC.
                                          TS20-6-000.................
                                          ER19-2233-003..............
E-13....................................  ER21-30-000................  Pattern Energy Wind Development LLC
E-14....................................  ER18-2358-004..............  Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
                                          ER19-1357-003..............  GridLiance High Plains LLC.
E-15....................................  EL10-65-007................  Louisiana Public Service Commission v.
                                                                        Entergy Corporation, Entergy Services,
                                                                        Inc., Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy
                                                                        Arkansas, Inc., Entergy New Orleans,
                                                                        Inc., Entergy Gulf States Louisiana,
                                                                        L.L.C., and Entergy Texas, Inc.
                                          ER14-2085-003..............  Entergy Services, Inc.
                                          ER11-3658-003
                                          ER12-1920-003
                                          ER13-1595-003
                                          (Consolidated).............
E-16....................................  OMITTED....................
E-17....................................  EL19-80-001................  Kansas Corporation Commission v. ITC
                                                                        Great Plains, LLC.
E-18....................................  EL20-49-000................  Shell Energy North America (US), L.P.
E-19....................................  ER20-1068-001..............  The Dayton Power and Light Company.
                                          ER20-2100-001..............  PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and The
                                                                        Dayton Power and Light Company.
E-20....................................  ER18-619-001...............  ISO New England Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Gas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G-1.....................................  OR18-9-000.................  White Cliffs Pipeline, L.L.C.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      HYDRO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H-1.....................................  P-2629-014.................  Village of Morrisville, Vermont.
H-2.....................................  P-2486-087.................  Wisconsin Electric Power Company.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Certificates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C-1.....................................  RM20-15-001................  Limiting Authorizations to Proceed with
                                                                        Construction Activities Pending
                                                                        Rehearing.
C-2.....................................  CP20-486-001...............  Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company.
C-3.....................................  CP15-17-005................  Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The public is invited to listen to the meeting live at http://ferc.capitolconnection.org/. Anyone with internet access who desires to
hear this event can do so by navigating to www.ferc.gov's Calendar of
Events and locating this event in the Calendar. The event will contain
a link to its audio webcast. The Capitol Connection provides technical
support for this free audio webcast. It will also offer access to this
event via phone bridge for a fee. If you have any questions, visit
http://ferc.capitolconnection.org/ or contact Shirley Al-Jarani at 703-
993-3104.

    Issued: November 12, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-25440 Filed 11-13-20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[ Federal Register: December 11, 2002 ( Volume 67, Number 238)] [ Notices] [ Page 76175 76176] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [ wais. access. gpo. gov] [ DOCID: fr11de02 34]

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ OPP 2002 0251; FRL 7283 9]

Diazinon; Availability of Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document for Comment; Reopening of Comment Period AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA).

ACTION: Notice; reopening of comment period.

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of September 25, 2002, announcing the availability and start of a 60 day public comment period on the Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( IRED) document for the pesticide active ingredient diazinon. This document is reopening the comment period from November 25, 2002, to January 10, 2003.

DATES: Comments identified by docket ID number OPP 2002 0251 must be received on or before January 10, 2003.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/ courier. Follow the detailed instructions as provided in Unit I. C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION of the September 25, 2002 Federal Register document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Parsons, Special Review and Reregistration Division ( 7508C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460 0001; telephone number: ( 703) 305 5776; e mail address: parsons. laura@ epa. gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

The Agency included in the September 25, 2002 Federal Register Notice, a list of those who may be potentially affected by this action. If you have questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?

1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this action under docket ID number OPP 2002 0251. The official public docket consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other information related to this action. Although, a part of the official docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business Information ( CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public docket is the collection of materials that are available for public viewing at the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch ( PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket telephone number is ( 703) 305 5805. 2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA internet under the `` Federal Register'' listings at http:// www. epa. gov/ fedrgstr/. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket/ to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select `` search,'' then key in the appropriate docket ID number.

C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?

To submit comments, or access the official public docket, please follow the detailed instructions as provided in Unit I. C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION of the September 25, 2002 Federal Register document. If you have questions, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

II. What Action is EPA Taking?

This document reopens the public comment period established in the Federal Register of September 25, 2002 ( 67 FR 60231) ( FRL 7274 4). In that document, EPA announced the availability of the IRED for the pesticide active ingredient diazinon and invited comment on the benefit assessments and risk mitigation in the document. EPA is hereby reopening the comment [[ Page 76176]]

period, which ended on November 25, 2002, to January 10, 2003.

List of Subjects Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

Dated: November 27, 2002. Lois Rossi, Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. [ FR Doc. 02 31242 Filed 12 10 02; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560 50 S


Schering-Plough’s response to Section 114 letter regarding CFC stocks owned.

Confidential Business Information located at EPA headquarters 1310 L St NW.


[Federal Register: September 8, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 172)]
[Notices]
[Page 46189]
[DOCID:fr08se09-57]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13535-000]

Muskingum Valley Hydro; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications

September 1, 2009.
    On July 6, 2009, Muskingum Valley Hydro filed an application for a
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act,
proposing to study the feasibility of the Muskingum Valley Hoover Dam
Hydroelectric Project No. 13535, to be located at the existing Hoover
Dam, on the Big Walnut River, in Franklin County, Ohio. The sole
purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the permit
holder priority to file a license application during the permit term. A
preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder to perform any
land disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands or waters
owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The existing Hoover Dam is owned and operated by the Ohio
Department of Natural Resources and includes the existing reservoir,
dam, outlet works, and tailrace. The proposed project would consist of:
(1) The existing 85.5-foot-high earth fill concrete gravity Hoover Dam
equipped with a 680-foot-long ogee spillway; (2) an existing 3,272-acre
impoundment with a normal water surface elevation 890 feet mean sea
level; (3) a new 30-foot-long by 30-foot-wide powerhouse containing two
turbine generator units for a total installed capacity of 3.5
megawatts; (4) a new 600-foot-long, 14.7-kilovolt transmission line;
and (5) appurtenant facilities. The proposed project would operate in
run-of-river mode and generate an estimated average annual generation
of 30,600,000 kilowatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Randall J. Smith, Muskingum Valley Hydro, 4950
Frazeysburg Road, Zanesville, Ohio 43701,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Michael Watts,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``eFiling'' link. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-
comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13535) in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-21626 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: December 11, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 237)]
[Notices]
[Page 65850]
[DOCID:fr11de09-116]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Percentage Rates of Covered
Aviation Employees for the Period of January 1, 2010, Through December
31, 2010

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA has determined that the minimum random drug and
alcohol testing percentage rates for the period January 1, 2010,
through December 31, 2010, will remain at 25 percent of safety-
sensitive employees for random drug testing and 10 percent of safety-
sensitive employees for random alcohol testing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeff Stookey, Office of Aerospace
Medicine, Drug Abatement Division, Program Administration Branch (AAM-
810), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Discussion: Pursuant to 14 CFR 120.109(b), the FAA Administrator's
decision on whether to change the minimum annual random drug testing
rate is based on the reported random drug test positive rate for the
entire aviation industry. If the reported random drug test positive
rate is less than 1.00%, the Administrator may continue the minimum
random drug testing rate at 25%. In 2008, the random drug test positive
rate was 0.588%. Therefore, the minimum random drug testing rate will
remain at 25% for calendar year 2010.
    Similarly, 14 CFR 120.217(c), requires the decision on the minimum
annual random alcohol testing rate to be based on the random alcohol
test violation rate. If the violation rate remains less than 0.50%, the
Administrator may continue the minimum random alcohol testing rate at
10%. In 2008, the random alcohol test violation rate was 0.123%.
Therefore, the minimum random alcohol testing rate will remain at 10%
for calendar year 2010.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you have questions about how the annual
random testing percentage rates are determined please refer to the Code
of Federal Regulations Title 14, section 120.109(b) (for drug testing),
and 120.217(c) (for alcohol testing).

    Issued in Washington, DC on December 8, 2009.
James R. Fraser,
Deputy Federal Air Surgeon.
[FR Doc. E9-29601 Filed 12-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


units), or solid oil-derived   emission rate for each hour of shutdown.
 fuel-fired EGU during         While firing coal, residual oil, or solid
 shutdown.                      oil-derived fuel during shutdown, you
                                must vent emissions to the main stack(s)
                                and operate all applicable control
                                devices and continue to operate those
                                control devices after the cessation of
                                coal, residual oil, or solid oil-derived
                                fuel being fed into the EGU and for as
                                long as possible thereafter considering
                                operational and safety concerns. In any
                                case, you must operate your controls
                                when necessary to comply with other
                                standards made applicable to the EGU by
                                a permit limit or a rule other than this
                                Subpart and that require operation of
                                the control devices.
                               If, in addition to the fuel used prior to
                                initiation of shutdown, another fuel
                                must be used to support the shutdown
                                process, that additional fuel must be
                                one or a combination of the clean fuels
                                defined in Sec.   63.10042 and must be
                                used to the maximum extent possible.
                               Relative to the syngas not fired in the
                                combustion turbine of an IGCC EGU during
                                shutdown, you must either: (1) flare the
                                syngas, or (2) route the syngas to duct
                                burners, which may need to be installed,
                                and route the flue gas from the duct
                                burners to the heat recovery steam
                                generator.
                               You must comply with all applicable
                                emission limits at all times except
                                during startup periods and shutdown
                                periods at which time you must meet this
                                work practice. You must collect
                                monitoring data during shutdown periods,
                                as specified in Sec.   63.10020(a). You
                                must keep records during shutdown
                                periods, as provided in Sec.  Sec.
                                63.10032 and 63.10021(h). Any fraction
                                of an hour in which shutdown occurs
                                constitutes a full hour of shutdown. You
                                must provide reports concerning
                                activities and shutdown periods, as
                                specified in Sec.  Sec.   63.10011(g),
                                63.10021(i), and 63.10031.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

0
17. Revise Table 9 to subpart UUUUU of part 63 to read as follows:

            Table 9 to Subpart UUUUU of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions to Subpart UUUUU
     [As stated in Sec.   63.10040, you must comply with the applicable General Provisions according to the
                                                   following]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Citation                             Subject                     Applies to subpart UUUUU
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.   63.1...........................  Applicability.................  Yes.
Sec.   63.2...........................  Definitions...................  Yes. Additional terms defined in Sec.
                                                                         63.10042.
Sec.   63.3...........................  Units and Abbreviations.......  Yes.
Sec.   63.4...........................  Prohibited Activities and       Yes.
                                         Circumvention.
Sec.   63.5...........................  Preconstruction Review and      Yes.
                                         Notification Requirements.
Sec.   63.6(a), (b)(1)-(5), (b)(7),     Compliance with Standards and   Yes.
 (c), (f)(2)-(3), (h)(2)-(9), (i), (j).  Maintenance Requirements.
Sec.   63.6(e)(1)(i)..................  General Duty to minimize        No. See Sec.   63.10000(b) for general
                                         emissions.                      duty requirement.
Sec.   63.6(e)(1)(ii).................  Requirement to correct          No.
                                         malfunctions ASAP.
Sec.   63.6(e)(3).....................  SSM Plan requirements.........  No.
Sec.   63.6(f)(1).....................  SSM exemption.................  No.
Sec.   63.6(h)(1).....................  SSM exemption.................  No.
Sec.   63.6(g)........................  Compliance with Standards and   Yes. See Sec.  Sec.   63.10011(g)(4) and
                                         Maintenance Requirements, Use   63.10021(h)(4) for additional
                                         of an alternative non-opacity   requirements.
                                         emission standard.
Sec.   63.7(e)(1).....................  Performance testing...........  No. See Sec.   63.10007.
Sec.   63.8...........................  Monitoring Requirements.......  Yes.
Sec.   63.8(c)(1)(i)..................  General duty to minimize        No. See Sec.   63.10000(b) for general
                                         emissions and CMS operation.    duty requirement.
Sec.   63.8(c)(1)(iii)................  Requirement to develop SSM      No.
                                         Plan for CMS.
Sec.   63.8(d)(3).....................  Written procedures for CMS....  Yes, except for last sentence, which
                                                                         refers to an SSM plan. SSM plans are
                                                                         not required.
Sec.   63.9...........................  Notification Requirements.....  Yes.
Sec.   63.10(a), (b)(1), (c), (d)(1)-   Recordkeeping and Reporting     Yes, except for the requirements to
 (2), (e), and (f).                      Requirements.                   submit written reports under Sec.
                                                                         63.10(e)(3)(v).
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(i).................  Recordkeeping of occurrence     No.
                                         and duration of startups and
                                         shutdowns.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(ii)................  Recordkeeping of malfunctions.  No. See Sec.   63.10001 for
                                                                         recordkeeping of (1) occurrence and
                                                                         duration and (2) actions taken during
                                                                         malfunction.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(iii)...............  Maintenance records...........  Yes.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(iv)................  Actions taken to minimize       No.
                                         emissions during SSM.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(v).................  Actions taken to minimize       No.
                                         emissions during SSM.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(vi)................  Recordkeeping for CMS           Yes.
                                         malfunctions.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(vii)-(ix)..........  Other CMS requirements........  Yes.
Sec.   63.10(b)(3), and (d)(3)-(5)....  ..............................  No.
Sec.   63.10(c)(7)....................  Additional recordkeeping        Yes.
                                         requirements for CMS--
                                         identifying exceedances and
                                         excess emissions.
Sec.   63.10(c)(8)....................  Additional recordkeeping        Yes.
                                         requirements for CMS--
                                         identifying exceedances and
                                         excess emissions.
Sec.   63.10(c)(10)...................  Recording nature and cause of   No. See Sec.   63.10032(g) and (h) for
                                         malfunctions.                   malfunctions recordkeeping
                                                                         requirements.
Sec.   63.10(c)(11)...................  Recording corrective actions..  No. See Sec.   63.10032(g) and (h) for
                                                                         malfunctions recordkeeping
                                                                         requirements.
Sec.   63.10(c)(15)...................  Use of SSM Plan...............  No.
Sec.   63.10(d)(5)....................  SSM reports...................  No. See Sec.   63.10021(h) and (i) for
                                                                         malfunction reporting requirements.
Sec.   63.11..........................  Control Device Requirements...  No.
Sec.   63.12..........................  State Authority and Delegation  Yes.
Sec.  Sec.   63.13-63.16..............  Addresses, Incorporation by     Yes.
                                         Reference, Availability of
                                         Information, Performance
                                         Track Provisions.
Sec.  Sec.   63.1(a)(5), (a)(7)-(9),    Reserved......................  No.
 (b)(2), (c)(3)-(4), (d), 63.6(b)(6),
 (c)(3), (c)(4), (d), (e)(2),
 (e)(3)(ii), (h)(3), (h)(5)(iv),
 63.8(a)(3), 63.9(b)(3), (h)(4),
 63.10(c)(2)-(4), (c)(9).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0
18. Appendix A to subpart UUUUU is amended by adding sections <IP_ADDRESS>,
<IP_ADDRESS>, and <IP_ADDRESS>, to read as follows:

Appendix A to Subpart UUUUU of Part 63--Hg Monitoring Provisions

* * * * *
    7. Recordkeeping and Reporting
* * * * *
    7.1.2 Operating Parameter Records. * * *
* * * * *
    <IP_ADDRESS> If applicable, a flag to indicate that the hour is a
startup or shutdown hour (as defined in Sec.  63.10042).
* * * * *
    7.1.8 Hg Emission Rate Records. * * *
* * * * *
    <IP_ADDRESS> If applicable, a code to indicate that the default
electrical load (as defined in Sec.  63.10042) was used to calculate
the Hg emission rate.
    <IP_ADDRESS> If applicable, a code to indicate that the diluent cap (as
defined in Sec.  63.10042) was used to calculate the Hg emission rate.
* * * * *
0
19. Appendix B to subpart UUUUU is amended by revising section 9.3.1
and adding sections <IP_ADDRESS>, <IP_ADDRESS>, and <IP_ADDRESS> to read as
follows:

Appendix B to Subpart UUUUU of Part 63---HCl and HF Monitoring
Provisions

* * * * *
    9. Data Reduction and Calculations
* * * * *
    9.3.1 For heat input-based emission rates, select an appropriate
emission rate equation from among Equations 19-1 through 19-9 in EPA
Method 19 in Appendix A-7 to part 60 of this chapter, to calculate the
HCl or HF emission rate in lb/MMBtu. Multiply the HCl concentration
value (ppm) by 9.43 x 10-8 to convert it to lb/scf, for use
in the applicable Method 19 equation. For HF, the conversion constant
from ppm to lb/scf is 5.18 x 10-8. The appropriate diluent
cap value from section <IP_ADDRESS> of Appendix A to this subpart may be
used to calculate the HCl or HF emission rate (lb/MMBtu) during startup
or shutdown hours.
* * * * *
    10. Recordkeeping Requirements
* * * * *
    10.1.2 Operating Parameter Records. * * *
* * * * *
    <IP_ADDRESS> If applicable, a flag to indicate that the hour is a
startup or shutdown hour (as defined in Sec.  63.10042).
* * * * *
    10.1.7 HCl and HF Emission Rate Records. * * *
* * * * *
    <IP_ADDRESS> If applicable, a code to indicate that the default
electrical load (as defined in Sec.  63.10042) was used to calculate
the HCl or HF emission rate.
    <IP_ADDRESS> If applicable, a code to indicate that the diluent cap (as
defined in Sec.  63.10042) was used to calculate the HCl or HF emission
rate.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-27125 Filed 11-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: February 27, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 38)]
[Notices]
[Page 9012-9013]
[DOCID:fr27fe09-127]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59434; File No. SR-BSE-2008-56]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change Relating to BOX Rules
Governing Doing Business With the Public

February 23, 2009.
    On December 9, 2008, the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. (``BSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\2\ The proposed rule change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on January 13, 2009.\3\ The Commission received no
comments on the proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed
rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59211 (January 7,
2009), 74 FR 1734 (January 13, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposed to amend Chapter XI of the Boston Options
Exchange (``BOX'') Rules by replacing the term ``Registered Options and
Security Futures Principal'' (``ROSFP'') with ``Registered Options
Principal'' (``ROP''). Although ROP was recently changed to ROSFP in
the BOX Rules, the Exchange believes that the change from ROP to ROSFP
may have created confusion among BOX participants, and that reverting
to ROP will alleviate this confusion. Furthermore, the Exchange
believes that reverting to ROP will provide consistency with the rules
of other options exchanges, most of which use ROP rather than ROSFP.\4\
The Exchange notes that the reversion to ROP does not affect the
qualifications required to transact options business with the public.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58932 (November 12,
2008), 73 FR 69696 (November 19, 2008) (SR-FINRA-2008-032) (changing
the term ``Registered Options and Security Futures Principal'' to
``Registered Options Principal''). See also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 58129 (July 9, 2008), 73 FR 40895 (SR-ISE-2008-21);
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57738 (April 29, 2008), 73 FR
25805 (May 7, 2008) (SR-Amex-2007-129); and Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 56971 (December 14, 2007), 72 FR 72804 (December 21,
2007) (SR-CBOE-2007-106) (approving elimination of the positions and
titles of Senior Registered Options Principal and Compliance
Registered Options Principal).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposed amending Chapter XI, Section 13 of the
BOX Rules to clarify that an options confirmation need not disclose the
exchange or exchanges on which an options transaction is executed. The
rule will continue to require that written confirmations contain a
description of each transaction in the options contract, the underlying
security, the type of option, the option expiration month, exercise
price, number of option contracts, premium, commissions, date of
transaction and settlement date, and shall indicate whether the
transaction is a purchase or sale and whether a principal or agency
transaction. The confirmation shall also distinguish by appropriate
symbols between Exchange transactions and other transactions in options
contracts. This change will maintain consistency with other exchanges
which have recently filed similar rule proposals.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58980 (November 19,
2008), 73 FR 72091 (November 26, 2008) (SR-CBOE-2008-61). See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58932 (November 12, 2008), 73 FR
69696 (November 19, 2008) (SR-FINRA-2008-032) (approving change
clarifying confirmation disclosure requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Lastly, the Exchange proposed elimination of the definition of
``closing purchase transaction'' as defined in Chapter I, Section 1 of
the BOX Rules. The term ``closing purchase transaction'' does not
appear in any other provision of the BOX Rules. Therefore, the
definition is unnecessary.

II. Discussion and Findings

    After careful review of the proposed rule change, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements
of Section 6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,\7\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, facilitate transactions in securities,
remove

impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and protect investors and the public
interest.\8\ The Commission believes that the proposal is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act because the proposed rule
change will clarify the use of certain terms consistent with their use
by other self-regulatory organizations, and also will clarify the
Exchange's options confirmation procedure rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b)(5).
    \8\ In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered
the proposed rule change's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 17c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,
that the proposed rule change (SR-BSE-2008-56) be, and hereby is,
approved.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-4183 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Changes in calculated burden are a result of updating relevant baseline information for each rule with the most current and accurate information available (e.g., PWS inventories) and updating burden to incorporate the results of consultation with stakeholders. Where appropriate and available, estimated violation, waiver, and other associated rates have also been updated to reflect current information on rule compliance.  Exhibits 13 and 14 summarize reasons for these changes and quantify the changes by rule.  Burden adjustments associated with PWS activities resulted in a burden decrease of 295,912 hours and are detailed in Exhibit 12.  Burden adjustments for primacy agencies result in a decrease of 89,012 hours per year, as shown in Exhibit 13.

Exhibit 12
Adjustments to PWS Burden from Previous ICR Estimates

Activity
Previous Annual
Burden Estimate
(hours)
2012 Annual
Burden Estimate
(Hours)
Annual Change in
Burden
(Hours)
Reason for Change in Annual Burden
Stage 1 DBPR
503,145
596,454
93,309
The increase in burden hours is
attributable to the use of updated
system inventories, numbers of entry
points per system, and percentages of
systems disinfecting, all of which are
used to calculate monitoring costs.
There was also a slight increase in
burden due incorporation of
consultation results.
Stage 2 DBPR
324,108
30,842
(293,266)
The decrease in burden hours is
attributable to the completion of various
activities required in the first 6 years
after promulgation. Implementation,
IDSEs, and monitoring plans were all
completed during the previous ICR
period.
Chemical Phases
Rules (Phases
II/IIB/V)
404,751
365,561
(39,190)
The decrease in PWS burden is
attributable to a combination of updated
system inventories and entry points per
system used to calculate monitoring
costs.
Radionuclides
35,278
14,448
(20,830)
The decrease in burden is attributable
to the fact that many systems only have
to monitor every 6 or 9 years and do not
have to take samples during this ICR
period.
Disinfectant Residual
Monitoring and
Associated Activities
under SWTR
1,013,976
1,039,257
25,281
The increase in burden is attributable to
the use of updated system inventories
and entry points per system to calculate
monitoring costs.
Arsenic Rule
98,735
71,761
(26,974)
The decrease in PWS burden is
attributable to a combination of updated
system inventories and entry points per
system used to calculate monitoring
costs. Also, the number of samples
decreased from the previous ICR
period; the previous period included
burden for systems exceeding the MCL
and taking quarterly samples for a year
before returning to compliance.
Lead and Copper
Rule
1,703,448
1,669,205
(34,243)
The decrease in burden is attributable
to the use of updated system
inventories and data on action level
exceedances, as well as updates to and
QA of the model.
TOTAL
4,083,440
3,787,528
(295,912)
Adjusted PWS Burden
Exhibit 13
Adjustments to Primacy Agency Burden from Previous ICR Estimates

                                   Activity
Previous Annual
Burden Estimate
(hours)
2012 Annual
Burden Estimate
(Hours)
Annual
Change
in Burden
(Hours)
Reason for Change in Annual Burden
Stage 1 DBPR
145,168
148,335
3,167
The increase in burden hours is attributable to the
use of updated system inventories and entry
points per system to calculate monitoring burden,
and State burden is based on system burden.
Stage 2 DBPR
29,511
50,822
21,311
The increase in burden hours is attributable to the
need for states to oversee compliance monitoring,
which begins in 2012.
Chemical Phases Rules
(Phases II/IIB/V)
1,354,532
1,354,532
0
The State burden for this rule is based on the State
Workload Model, which has not changed.
Radionuclides
4,233
1,734
(2,499)
The decrease in burden is attributable to the fact
that many systems only have to monitor every 6 or
9 years and do not have to take samples during
this ICR period; State burden is based on system
burden.
Disinfectant Residual
Monitoring and
Associated Activities
under SWTR
271,310
150,462
(120,848)
Because total SWTR primacy agency burden is
derived from the State Workload Model, a single
burden value is given for the SWTR. Therefore, in
order to estimate burden for SWTR activities
covered under this ICR,  burden hours were
apportioned based on the relative proportion of
burden hours for PWS activities covered under
this ICR and the Microbial Rules ICR.
Arsenic Rule
28,210
18,765
(9,445)
The  decrease in burden is attributable to a
decrease in the system burden; state burden is
based on system burden. System burden
decreased due to a combination of updated system
inventories and entry points per system used to
calculate monitoring costs. Also, the number of
samples decreased from the previous ICR period;
the previous period included burden for systems
exceeding the MCL and taking quarterly samples
for a year before returning to compliance.
Lead and Copper Rule
202,855
222,157
19,302
The increase in burden is due to updates to and
QA of the model.
TOTAL
2,035,819
1,946,807
(89,012)
Adjusted Primacy Agency Burden
Note: Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.

	Exhibit 14 shows the affect of these adjustments on the bottom line burden.  Subtracting 295,912 hours to account for the adjustment for the PWS burden and 89,012 hours to account for the downward adjustment for the primacy burden yields 5,734,335 hours.

Exhibit 14
Adjustments to Annual Burden Carried Forward from Previous ICR Estimates (Includes both PWS and Primacy Agency Burden)

                                    Action
Annual Burden Hours
Brief Explanation
None
6,119,259
2008 DDBP/Chem/Rads Rules ICR inventory based on current burden
inventories (see Exhibit 11).
Add
(295,912)
Adjustment to the PWS burden carried forward from previous ICRs (see
Exhibit 12).
Add
(89,012)
Adjustment to the primacy agency burden carried forward from previous
ICRs (see Exhibit 13).
Total
5,734,335
Hours requested in 2012 DDBP/Chem/Rads Rules ICR.
Note: Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.

6(g)	Burden Statement

	The public reporting burden for collections included in this ICR is detailed in Exhibit 14 above. The annual respondent burden is estimated to average approximately 5,734,335 hours, of which 3,787,528 hours are attributable to PWSs and 1,946,807 hours to primacy agencies (numbers may not add due to rounding).  These estimates include time for gathering information as well as developing and maintaining records.

	Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by people to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology, and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information collection unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.

      To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0439, which is available for online viewing at www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the Water Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. An electronic version of the public docket is available at www.regulations.gov. This site can be used to submit or view public comments, to access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. When in the system, select "search," then key in the Docket ID Number identified above. Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0439 and the OMB Control Number 2040-0204 in any correspondence.