[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 26, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48532-48537]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20954]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Part 744

[Docket No. 180910826-8826-01]
RIN 0694-AH63

Addition of Certain Entities to the Entity List, Revision of an
Entry on the Entity List and Removal of an Entity From the Entity List

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule amends the Export Administration Regulations
(EAR) by adding fourteen entities to the Entity List. These fourteen
entities have been determined by the U.S. Government to be acting
contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the
United States and will be listed on the Entity List under the
destinations of Belarus, Iran, Russia, and Singapore. This rule also
modifies one entry on the Entity List under the destination of the
United Arab Emirates. Lastly, this rule removes one entity under the
destination of Hong Kong from the Entity List. The removal is made in
connection with a request for removal BIS received pursuant to the EAR
and a review of information provided in that request.

DATES: This rule is effective September 26, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chair, End-User Review Committee,
Office of the Assistant Secretary, Export Administration, Bureau of
Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>,
Email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Entity List (15 CFR, Subchapter C, part 744, Supplement No. 4)
identifies entities reasonably believed to be involved, or to pose a
significant risk of being or becoming involved, in activities contrary
to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United
States. The Export Administration Regulations (EAR) (15 CFR, Subchapter
C, parts 730-774) imposes additional license requirements on, and
limits the availability of most license exceptions for, exports,
reexports, and transfers (in-country) to listed entities. The license
review policy for each listed entity is identified in the ``License
review policy'' column on the Entity List, and the impact on the
availability of license exceptions is described in the relevant Federal
Register notice adding entities to the Entity List. BIS places entities
on the Entity List pursuant to part 744 (Control Policy: End-User and
End-Use Based) and part 746 (Embargoes and Other Special Controls) of
the EAR.
    The End-User Review Committee (ERC), composed of representatives of
the Departments of Commerce (Chair), State, Defense, Energy and, where
appropriate, the Treasury, makes all decisions regarding additions to,
removals from, or other modifications to the Entity List. The ERC makes
all decisions to add an entry to the Entity List by majority vote, and
makes all decisions to remove or modify an entry by unanimous vote.

ERC Entity List Decisions

Additions to the Entity List

    This rule implements the decision of the ERC to add fourteen
entities to the Entity List. The addition of these fourteen entities
involves sixteen Entity List entries, as one of the entities being
added has locations in three destinations. The fourteen entities are
being added based on Sec.  744.11 (License requirements that apply to
entities acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States) of the EAR. The sixteen entries consist
of two entries located in Belarus, one entry located in Iran, twelve
entries located in Russia and one entry located in Singapore.
    The ERC reviewed Sec.  744.11(b) (Criteria for revising the Entity
List) in making the determination to add these fourteen entities to the
Entity List. Under that paragraph, persons for whom there is reasonable
cause to believe, based on specific and articulable facts, that they
have been involved, are involved, or pose a significant risk of being
or becoming involved in, activities that are contrary to the national
security or foreign policy interests of the United States, along with
those acting on behalf of such persons, may be added to the Entity
List. Paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(5) of Sec.  744.11 provide an
illustrative list of activities that could be contrary to the national
security or foreign policy interests of the United States. For each of
the fourteen entities described below, the ERC made the requisite
determination under the standard set forth in Sec.  744.11(b).
    Pursuant to Sec.  744.11(b) of the EAR, the ERC determined that
Nilco Group, located in Belarus, Iran, and Russia, and Mohammad Najafi,
located in Belarus, be added to the Entity List based on their
involvement in providing material support to Iranian missile programs.
    The ERC also determined that four commercial companies--Joint Stock
Company Scientific-Research Institute ``Vektor'', Open Joint Stock
Company Information Technology and Communication Systems, Federal State
Unitary Enterprise Scientific Production Enterprise ``GAMMA'', and
Syrus Systems--located in Russia be added to the Entity List. These
entities have enabled the activities of malicious Russian cyber actors.
In addition, the ERC determined that two entities, Divetechnoservices
and Oceanos, be added to the Entity List under the destination of
Russia for providing equipment and support to the Russian Navy. The ERC
also determined that five entities--AeroComposit; Obinsk Research and
Production Enterprise (ORPE), Open Joint Stock Company Aviadvigatel,
Open Joint Stock Company Scientific and Production Corporation of
Precision Instruments Engineering (NPK-SPP), and Voronezh Scientific
Research Institute ``Vega''--be added to the Entity List for supporting
Russian military aerospace production activities.
    Under the destination of Singapore, the ERC determined that one
entity, All Industrial Manufacturing (AIM) Pte Ltd., be added to the
Entity List based on its involvement in the proliferation of
unsafeguarded nuclear activities.
    Pursuant to Sec.  744.11(b) of the EAR, the ERC determined that the
conduct of these fourteen entities raises sufficient concern that prior
review of exports, reexports or transfers (in-country) of all items
subject to the EAR involving these entities, and the possible
imposition of license conditions or license denials on shipments to the
persons, will enhance BIS's ability to prevent violations of the EAR.
    For thirteen of the fourteen entities described above that are
being added to the Entity List, BIS imposes a license requirement for
all items subject to the EAR and a license review policy of presumption
of denial. For All Industrial Manufacturing (AIM) Pte Ltd, the entity
added under Singapore, BIS imposes a license requirement for all items
subject to the EAR and will exercise the license review policy set
forth in subpart (d) of EAR Sec.  744.2, a nuclear end-user and end-use
based provision. For all fourteen entities, the license requirements
apply to any transaction in which items are to be exported, reexported,
or transferred (in-country) to any of the entities or in which such
entities act as purchaser, intermediate consignee, ultimate consignee,
or end-user. In addition, no

license exceptions are available for exports, reexports, or transfers
(in-country) to the entities being added to the Entity List in this
rule. The acronym ``a.k.a.'' (also known as) is used in entries on the
Entity List to identify aliases, thereby assisting exporters,
reexporters and transferors in identifying entities on the Entity List.
    This final rule adds the following fourteen entities to the Entity
List, including one entity listed under three entries:

Belarus

    (1) Mohammad Ghassem Najafi,
    Unit 705, No. 103, Potbediteley Ave., Minsk, Belarus; and
    (2) Nilco Group, a.k.a., the following one alias:

--Nilfam Khazar Co.

    Unit 705, No. 103, Potbediteley Ave., Minsk, Belarus (see alternate
addresses under Iran and Russia).

Iran

    (1) Nilco Group, a.k.a., the following one alias:

--Nilfam Khazar Co.

    Unit 6, No. 1, Mehr Alley, Gilan St., Boostan 2, Pasdaran Ave.,
Tehran, Iran (see alternate addresses under Belarus and Russia).

Russia

    (1) AeroComposit,
    Antonova Prospekt 1, Zavolzhsky District, Ulyanovsk, 432072,
Russia;
    (2) Divetechnoservices, a.k.a., the following five aliases:

--OOO Divetechnoservice;
--OOO Daivtekhnoservis;
--OOO Dayvtekhnoservis;
--OOO NPP DTS; and
--OOO DTS.

    Ulitsa Zheleznovodskaya, 18/2 Litera A, Saint Petersburg, 199155,
Russia;
    (3) Federal State Unitary Enterprise Scientific Production
Enterprise ``GAMMA'',
    Ul. Profsoyuznaya d. 78 str. 4, Moscow, 117393, Russia;
    (4) Joint Stock Company Scientific-Research Institute ``Vektor'',
    Ul. Akademika Pavlova, d. 14-A, Saint Petersburg, 197376, Russia;
    (5) Nilco Group, a.k.a., the following one alias:

--Nilfam Khazar Co.

    Unit 439, 2 Mozhayskoe Road, Moscow, Russia (see alternate
addresses under Belarus and Iran);
    (6) Obinsk Research and Production Enterprise (ORPE), a.k.a., the
following three aliases:

--ORPE Technologiya;
--ONPP Technologiya; and
--Obinsk Composite Materials Plant.

    Kievskoe Shosse 15, Obinsk, 249031, Russia;
    (7) Oceanos,
    19/2 Esenina Street, Saint Petersburg, 194295, Russia; and 16/2 A-H
Engelsa Prospekt, Saint Petersburg, 195156, Russia;
    (8) Open Joint Stock Company Aviadvigatel, a.k.a., the following
one alias:

--AVI.

    Komsomolsky Prospekt 93, Perm, 614990, Russia;
    (9) Open Joint Stock Company Information Technology and
Communication Systems, a.k.a., the following two aliases:

--OJSC Infoteks; and
--OJSC Infotecs.

    Proezd Petrovsko-Razumovski Star, d. 1/23 str. 1 Business Center
``Vympel,'' Moscow, 127287, Russia;
    (10) Open Joint Stock Company Scientific and Production Corporation
of Precision Instruments Engineering (NPK-SPP), a.k.a., the following
one alias:

--OJC RPC PSI.

    Aviamotornaya Ulitsa 53, Moscow, 111024, Russia;
    (11) Syrus Systems,
    3-Y Novyy Pereulok, 5, Moscow, 107140, Russia; and
    (12) Voronezh Scientific Research Institute ``Vega'', a.k.a., the
following two aliases:

--Voronezhskiy Nauchno-Issledovatelskiy Institut ``Vega''; and
--VNII ``Vega''.

    Moskovskiy Prospekt 7B, Voronezh, 394026, Russia.

Singapore

    (1) All Industrial Manufacturing (AIM) Pte Ltd.,
    4 Kaki Bukit Ave 1, #02-05, 417939, Singapore.

Modifications to the Entity List

    This final rule implements the decision of the ERC to modify one
existing entry, AdCom Systems, which was added to the Entity List under
the destination of the United Arab Emirates on March 21, 2016 (81 FR
14958) for attempting to export Missile Technology Control Regime
(MTCR) Category I unmanned aerial vehicles to countries that are not
MTCR members. The ERC determined that AdCom Systems has been using two
aliases, Sky Global Communications and Sky Global Communications
Systems. Consequently, BIS is revising the entry for AdCom Systems by
adding two aliases and a new address.
    This final rule makes the following modifications to one entry on
the Entity List:

United Arab Emirates

    (1) AdCom Systems, a.k.a., the following two aliases:

--Sky Global Communications; and
--Sky Global Communication Systems.

    Industrial City of Abu Dhabi--ICAD1, Mussafah, Abu Dhabi, UAE; and
#2 Mezzanine Level, Block 19, Sharq 40 Al Morour Street, Abu Dhabi
Island, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Removal From the Entity List

    This rule implements a decision of the ERC to remove Antony
Emmanuel, an entity located in Hong Kong, from the Entity List on the
basis of a removal request. The entry for Antony Emmanuel was added to
the Entity List on October 22, 2008 (73 FR 54505). The ERC decided to
remove this entry based on information BIS received pursuant to Sec.
744.16 of the EAR and the review the ERC conducted in accordance with
procedures described in Supplement No. 5 to part 744.
    This final rule implements the decision to remove the following
entity located in Hong Kong from the Entity List:

Hong Kong

    (1) Antony Emmanuel,
    No. 3 & 4, 12F Commercial VIP Building, 112-116 Canton Rd., Tsim
Sha Tsui, Hong Kong.

Savings Clause

    Shipments of items removed from eligibility for a License Exception
or for export or reexport without a license (NLR) as a result of this
regulatory action that were en route aboard a carrier to a port of
export or reexport, on September 26, 2018, pursuant to actual orders
for export or reexport to a foreign destination, may proceed to that
destination under the previous eligibility for a License Exception or
export or reexport without a license (NLR).

Export Control Reform Act of 2018

    On August 13, 2018, the President signed into law the John S.
McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, which
included the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA) (Title XVII,
Subtitle B of Pub. L. 115-232), which provides the legal basis for
BIS's principal authorities and serves as the authority under which BIS
issues this rule. As set forth in Sec.  1768 of ECRA, all delegations,
rules, regulations, orders, determinations, licenses, or other forms of

administrative action that have been made, issued, conducted, or
allowed to become effective under the Export Administration Act of 1979
(50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.) (as in effect prior to August 13, 2018 and as
continued in effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) and Executive Order 13222 of August
17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by Executive
Order 13637 of March 8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013), and as
extended by the Notice of August 8, 2018, 83 FR 39871 (August 13,
2018)), or the Export Administration Regulations, and are in effect as
of August 13, 2018, shall continue in effect according to their terms
until modified, superseded, set aside, or revoked under the authority
of ECRA.

Rulemaking Requirements

    1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866. This rule is not an Executive Order
13771 regulatory action because this rule is not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
    2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to or be subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with a collection of information, subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA), unless
that collection of information displays a currently valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This regulation involves
collections previously approved by OMB under control number 0694-0088,
Simplified Network Application Processing System, which includes, among
other things, license applications, and carries a burden estimate of
43.8 minutes for a manual or electronic submission.
    Total burden hours associated with the PRA and OMB control number
0694-0088 are not expected to increase as a result of this rule. You
may send comments regarding the collection of information associated
with this rule, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to
Jasmeet K. Seehra, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), by email to
[email protected], or by fax to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
    4. Pursuant to Sec.  1762 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018
(Title XVII, Subtitle B of Pub. L. 115-232), which was included in the
John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019,
this action is exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) requirements for notice of proposed rulemaking, opportunity for
public participation, and delay in effective date.
    5. This action involves the removal of an entity from the Entity
List. Removals from the Entity List involve interagency deliberation
and result from review of public and non-public sources, including,
where applicable, sensitive law enforcement information and classified
information, and the measurement of such information against the Entity
List removal criteria. This information is reviewed according to the
procedures and criteria for evaluating removal requests from the Entity
List, as set forth in 15 CFR 744.11, 15 CFR 744.16, and 15 CFR part
744, Supplement No. 5. For reasons of national security, BIS is not at
liberty to provide to the public detailed information on which the ERC
relies to make the decisions to remove these entities. In addition, the
information included in a removal request is exchanged between the
applicant and the ERC, which by law (Sec.  1761(h) of the ECRA), BIS is
restricted from sharing with the public. Moreover, removal requests
from the Entity List may contain confidential business information that
is necessary for the extensive review conducted by the ERC.
    6. Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C.
553, or by any other law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., are not applicable.
Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required and none
has been prepared.

List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 744

    Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Terrorism.

    Accordingly, part 744 of the Export Administration Regulations (15
CFR parts 730-774) is amended as follows:

PART 744--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 744 continues to read as
follows:

     Authority: Pub. L. 115-232, Title XVII, Subtitle B. 50 U.S.C.
4601 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42
U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43
FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR,
1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p.
950; E.O. 12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 356; E.O. 13026,
61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3
CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp.,
p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; Notice
of September 18, 2017, 82 FR 43825 (September 19, 2017); Notice of
November 6, 2017, 82 FR 51971 (November 8, 2017); Notice of January
17, 2018, 83 FR 2731 (January 18, 2018); Notice of August 8, 2018,
83 FR 39871 (August 13, 2018).

0
2. Supplement No. 4 to part 744 is amended:
0
a. Under Belarus, by adding in alphabetical order, two Belarusian
entities, ``Mohammad Ghassem Najafi'' and ``Nilco Group'';
0
b. Under Hong Kong, by removing one Hong Kong entity, ``Antony
Emmanuel, No. 3 & 4, 12F Commercial VIP Building, 112-116 Canton Rd.,
Tsim Sha Tsui, Hong Kong'';
0
c. Under Iran, by adding in alphabetical order, one Iranian entity,
``Nilco Group'';
0
d. Under Russia, by adding in alphabetical order, twelve Russian
entities, ``AeroComposit,'' '' Divetechnoservices,'' ``Federal State
Unitary Enterprise Scientific Production Enterprise ``GAMMA'',''
``Joint Stock Company Scientific-Research Institute ``Vektor'',''
``Nilco Group,'' ``Obinsk Research and Production Enterprise (ORPE),''
``Oceanos,'' ``Open Joint Stock Company Aviadvigatel,'' ``Open Joint
Stock Company Information Technology and Communication Systems,''
``Open Joint Stock Company Scientific and Production Corporation of
Precision Instruments Engineering (NPK-SPP),'' ``Syrus Systems,'' and
``Voronezh Scientific Research Institute ``Vega'' '';
0
e. Under Singapore, by adding in alphabetical order, one Singaporean
entity, ``All Industrial Manufacturing (AIM) Pte Ltd.'';
0
f. Under the United Arab Emirates, by revising Emirati entity, ``AdCom
Systems''.
    The additions and revisions read as follows:

                                    Supplement No. 4 to Part 744--Entity List
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             License         License  review   Federal  Register
        Country                     Entity                 requirement            policy            citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BELARUS................   * * * * * *
                         Mohammad Ghassem Najafi,      For all items        Presumption of     83 FR [INSERT FR
                          Unit 705, No. 103,            subject to the       denial.            PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                          Potbediteley Ave., Minsk,     EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                          Belarus.                      744.11 of the
                                                        EAR.)
                          * * * * * *
                         Nilco Group, a.k.a., the      For all items        Presumption of     83 FR [INSERT FR
                          following one alias:          subject to the       denial.            PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                         --Nilfam Khazar Co.            EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                         Unit 705, No. 103,             744.11 of the
                          Potbediteley Ave., Minsk,     EAR.)
                          Belarus (see alternate
                          addresses under Iran and
                          Russia.)
                          * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IRAN...................   * * * * * *
                         Nilco Group, a.k.a., the      For all items        Presumption of     83 FR [INSERT FR
                          following one alias:          subject to the       denial.            PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                         --Nilfam Khazar Co.            EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                         Unit 6, No. 1, Mehr Alley,     744.11 of the
                          Gilan St., Boostan 2,         EAR.)
                          Pasdaran Ave., Tehran, Iran
                          (see alternate addresses
                          under Belarus and Russia).
                          * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RUSSIA.................   * * * * * *
                         AeroComposit, Antonova        For all items        Presumption of     83 FR [INSERT FR
                          Prospekt 1, Zavolzhsky        subject to the       denial.            PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                          District, Ulyanovsk,          EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                          432072, Russia.               744.11 of the
                                                        EAR.)
                          * * * * * *
                         Divetechnoservices, a.k.a.,   For all items        Presumption of     83 FR [INSERT FR
                          the following five aliases:   subject to the       denial.            PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                         --OOO Divetechnoservice;       EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                         --OOO Daivtekhnoservis;        744.11 of the
                         --OOO Dayvtekhnoservis;        EAR.)
                         --OOO NPP DTS; and
                         --OOO DTS.
                         Ulitsa Zheleznovodskaya, 18/
                          2 Litera A, Saint
                          Petersburg, 199155, Russia.
                          * * * * * *
                         Federal State Unitary         For all items        Presumption of     83 FR [INSERT FR
                          Enterprise Scientific         subject to the       denial.            PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                          Production Enterprise         EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                          ``GAMMA'', Ul.                744.11 of the
                          Profsoyuznaya d. 78 str. 4,   EAR.)
                          Moscow, 117393, Russia.
                          * * * * * *
                         Joint Stock Company           For all items        Presumption of     83 FR [INSERT FR
                          Scientific-Research           subject to the       denial.            PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                          Institute ``Vektor'', Ul.     EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                          Akademika Pavlova, d. 14-A,   744.11 of the
                          Saint Petersburg, 197376,     EAR.)
                          Russia.
                          * * * * * *
                         Nilco Group, a.k.a., the      For all items        Presumption of     83 FR [INSERT FR
                          following one alias:          subject to the       denial.            PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                         --Nilfam Khazar Co.            EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                         Unit 439, 2 Mozhayskoe Road,   744.11 of the
                          Moscow, Russia (see           EAR.)
                          alternate addresses under
                          Belarus and Iran).
                          * * * * * *

                         Obinsk Research and           For all items        Presumption of     83 FR [INSERT FR
                          Production Enterprise         subject to the       denial.            PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                          (ORPE), a.k.a., the           EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                          following three aliases:      744.11 of the
                         --ORPE Technologiya;           EAR.)
                         --ONPP Technologiya; and
                         --Obinsk Composite Materials
                          Plant.
                         Kievskoe Shosse 15, Obinsk,
                          249031, Russia.
                          * * * * * *
                         Oceanos, 19/2 Esenina         For all items        Presumption of     83 FR [INSERT FR
                          Street, Saint Petersburg,     subject to the       denial.            PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                          194295, Russia; and 16/2 A-   EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                          H Engelsa Prospekt, Saint     744.11 of the
                          Petersburg, 195156, Russia.   EAR.)
                          * * * * * *
                         Open Joint Stock Company      For all items        Presumption of     83 FR [INSERT FR
                          Aviadvigatel, a.k.a., the     subject to the       denial.            PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                          following one alias:          EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                         --AVI.                         744.11 of the
                         Komsomolsky Prospekt 93,       EAR.)
                          Perm, 614990, Russia.
                          * * * * * *
                         Open Joint Stock Company      For all items        Presumption of     83 FR [INSERT FR
                          Information Technology and    subject to the       denial.            PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                          Communication Systems,        EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                          a.k.a., the following two     744.11 of the
                          aliases:                      EAR.)
                         --OJSC Infoteks; and
                         --OJSC Infotecs.
                         Proezd Petrovsko-Razumovski
                          Star, d. 1/23 str. 1
                          Business Center ``Vympel,''
                          Moscow, 127287, Russia.
                          * * * * * *
                         Open Joint Stock Company      For all items        Presumption of     83 FR [INSERT FR
                          Scientific and Production     subject to the       denial.            PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                          Corporation of Precision      EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                          Instruments Engineering       744.11 of the
                          (NPK-SPP), a.k.a., the        EAR.)
                          following one alias:
                         --OJC RPC PSI.
                         Aviamotornaya Ulitsa 53,
                          Moscow, 111024, Russia.
                          * * * * * *
                         Syrus Systems, 3-Y Novyy      For all items        Presumption of     83 FR [INSERT FR
                          Pereulok, 5, Moscow,          subject to the       denial.            PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                          107140, Russia.               EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                                                        744.11 of the
                                                        EAR.)
                          * * * * * *
                         Voronezh Scientific Research  For all items        Presumption of     83 FR [INSERT FR
                          Institute ``Vega``, a.k.a.,   subject to the       denial.            PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                          the following two aliases:    EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                         --Voronezhskiy Nauchno-        744.11 of the
                          Issledovatelskiy Institut     EAR.)
                          ``Vega``; and
                         --VNII Vega.
                         Moskovskiy Prospekt 7B,
                          Voronezh, 394026, Russia.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SINGAPORE..............   * * * * * *
                         All Industrial Manufacturing  For all items        See 744.2(d) of    83 FR [INSERT FR
                          (AIM) Pte Ltd., 4 Kaki        subject to the       the EAR.           PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                          Bukit Ave 1, #02-05,          EAR. (See Sec.                          2018].
                          417939, Singapore.            744.11 of the
                                                        EAR.)
                          * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES...   * * * * * *

                         AdCom Systems, a.k.a. the     For all items        Presumption of     81 FR 14958, 3/21/
                          following two aliases:        subject to the       denial.            16.
                         --Sky Global Communications;   EAR. (See Sec.                         83 FR [INSERT FR
                          and                           744.11 of the                           PAGE NUMBER 9/26/
                         --Sky Global Communication     EAR.)                                   2018].
                          Systems.
                         Industrial City of Abu
                          Dhabi--ICAD1, Mussafah, Abu
                          Dhabi, UAE; and #2
                          Mezzanine Level, Block 19,
                          Sharq 40 Al Morour Street,
                          Abu Dhabi Island, Abu
                          Dhabi, UAE.
                          * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: September 21, 2018.
Richard E. Ashooh,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2018-20954 Filed 9-25-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P


EO12866_Transportation Conformity 2060-AR03 NPRM_20110613

 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 40 CFR Part 93
 EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0393; FRL_XXXX-X
 RIN 2060-AR03
 Transportation Conformity Rule:  MOVES Regional Grace Period Extension
 AGENCY:  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

 ACTION:  Proposed rule.

 SUMMARY:  EPA is proposing to extend the grace period before the MOtor Vehicle Emission Simulator model (currently MOVES2010a) is required for regional emissions analyses for transportation conformity determinations ("regional conformity analyses").  This proposal would provide an additional year to the previously established two-year conformity grace period, so that MOVES2010a would not be required for regional conformity analyses until March 2, 2013.  This proposal would not affect EPA's previous approval of the use of MOVES in official state air quality implementation plan (SIP) submissions or the existing grace period before MOVES2010a is required for carbon monoxide and particulate matter hot-spot analyses for project-level conformity determinations.
 DATES: Written comments on this proposal must be received on or before [insert date 30 days after publication in the Federal Register].
 ADDRESSES:  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-OAR-2011-0393, by one of the following methods:
   * www.regulations.gov:  Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
   * Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>   * Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>
   * Mail:  Air Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C., 20460, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0393.  Please include a total of two copies.
   * Hand Delivery:  Air Docket, Environmental Protection Agency:  EPA West Building, EPA Docket Center (Room 3334), 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, D.C., Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0393.  Please include two copies.  Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
 Instructions:  Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0393.  EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.  Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or e-mail.  The www.regulations.gov website is an "anonymous access" system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.  If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet.  If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit.  If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.  Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.  For additional information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.  For additional instructions on submitting comments, go to Section I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket:  All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index.  Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.  Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.  Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC.  The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.  The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER> and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Meg Patulski, State Measures and Conformity Group, Transportation and Regional Programs Division, Environmental Protection Agency, 2000 Traverwood Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Astrid Larsen, State Measures and Conformity Group, Transportation and Regional Programs Division, Environmental Protection Agency, 2000 Traverwood Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  The content of this preamble are listed in the following outline:
I. General Information
II. Background
III. Extension of MOVES2010a Regional Conformity Grace Period
IV. Conformity SIPs
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Availability of MOVES2010a and Support Materials
Copies of the official version of the MOVES2010a motor vehicle emissions model, along with user guides and supporting documentation, are available on EPA's MOVES website: www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/index.htm.
Guidance on how to apply MOVES2010a for SIPs and transportation conformity purposes, including "Policy Guidance on the Use of MOVES2010 for State Implementation Plan Development, Transportation Conformity, and Other Purposes" (EPA-420-B-09-046, December 2009) and "Technical Guidance on the Use of MOVES2010 for Emission Inventory Preparation in State Implementation Plans and Transportation Conformity" (EPA-420-B-10-023, April 2010) can be found on the EPA's transportation conformity website at: www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/policy.htm.
   I. General Information
A.  	Does This Action Apply to Me?
       Entities potentially regulated by the transportation conformity rule are those that adopt, approve, or fund transportation plans, programs, or projects under title 23 U.S.C. or title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53.  Regulated categories and entities affected by today's action include:
 Category
 Examples of regulated entities
 Local government
 Local transportation and air quality agencies, including metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs).
 State government
 State transportation and air quality agencies.
 Federal government
 Department of Transportation (Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA)).

 	This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this proposal.  This table lists the types of entities of which EPA is aware that potentially could be regulated by the transportation conformity rule.  Other types of entities not listed in the table could also be regulated.  To determine whether your organization is regulated by this action, you should carefully examine the applicability requirements in 40 CFR 93.102.  If you have questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the persons listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
 B. 	What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1.	Submitting CBI
	Do not submit this information to EPA through www.regulations.gov or e-mail.  Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI.  For CBI information in a disk or CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI.  In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.  Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR Part 2.
2.	Tips for Preparing Your Comments
	When submitting comments, remember to:
 Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
 Follow directions - The Agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
 Explain why you agree or disagree, suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes.
 Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/or data that you used.
 If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced.
 Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and suggest alternatives.
 Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats.
 Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified.
3.	Docket Copying Costs
 	You may be required to pay a reasonable fee for copying docket materials.
 C.	How Do I Get Copies of This Proposed Rule and Other Documents?
 1.	Docket
 	EPA has established an official public docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0393.  You can get a paper copy of this Federal Register document, as well as the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other information related to this action at the official public docket.  See the ADDRESSES section for its location.
 2.	Electronic Access
 	You may access this Federal Register document electronically through EPA's Transportation Conformity website at www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/index.htm.  You may also access this document electronically under the Federal Register listings at www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
 	An electronic version of the official public docket is available through www.regulations.gov.  You may use www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically.  Once in the system, select "search," then key in the appropriate docket identification number.
 	Certain types of information will not be placed in the electronic public docket.  Information claimed as CBI and other information for which disclosure is restricted by statute is not available for public viewing in the electronic public docket.  EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will not be placed in the electronic public docket but will be available only in printed, paper form in the official public docket.
       To the extent feasible, publicly available docket materials will be made available in the electronic public docket.  When a document is selected from the index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify whether the document is available for viewing in the electronic public docket.  Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in the ADDRESSES section.  EPA intends to provide electronic access in the future to all of the publicly available docket materials through the electronic public docket.
 	Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be transferred to the electronic public docket.  Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be scanned and placed in the electronic public docket.  Where practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph will be placed in the electronic public docket along with a brief description written by the docket staff.
	For additional information about the electronic public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
II.	Background
A.	What Is Transportation Conformity?
       Transportation conformity is required under Clean Air Act (CAA) section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)) to ensure that transportation plans, transportation improvement programs (TIPs), and federally supported highway and transit projects are consistent with the purpose of the SIP.  Conformity to the purpose of the SIP means that transportation activities will not cause or contribute to new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the relevant national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) or required interim milestones.
       Transportation conformity (hereafter, "conformity") applies to areas that are designated nonattainment, and those areas redesignated to attainment after 1990 ("maintenance areas") for transportation-related criteria pollutants:  ozone, particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2).  EPA's conformity rule (40 CFR Parts 51 and 93) establishes the criteria and procedures for determining whether transportation activities conform to the SIP.  EPA first promulgated the conformity rule on November 24, 1993 (58 FR 62188) and subsequently published several other amendments.  The Department of Transportation (DOT) is EPA's federal partner in implementing the conformity regulation.  EPA has coordinated with DOT, and they concur with this proposal.
 B.	What Is MOVES2010a, and How Has It Been Implemented to Date?
The MOtor Vehicle Emission Simulator model (MOVES) is EPA's state-of-the-art model for estimating emissions from highway vehicles, based on analyses of millions of emission test results and considerable advances in the Agency's understanding of vehicle emissions.  MOVES is currently EPA's official emissions model for state and local agencies to estimate volatile organic compounds (VOCs), nitrogen oxides (NOx), PM, CO, and other precursors from cars, trucks, buses, and motorcycles for SIP purposes and conformity determinations outside of California.  MOVES' database-centered design allows EPA to update emissions data more frequently and allows users much greater flexibility in organizing input and output data.
      MOVES2010a is the latest official version of MOVES that EPA has approved for SIP and conformity purposes.  EPA originally announced the release of MOVES2010 in the Federal Register on March 2, 2010 (75 FR 9411) and subsequently released MOVES2010a on September 8, 2010.  MOVES2010a includes minor revisions that enhance model performance and did not significantly affect criteria pollutant emissions results.  Since these are minor revisions to MOVES2010, MOVES2010a is not considered a "new model" under section 93.111 of the conformity rule, as described further below.
      MOVES2010a is a significant improvement over the previous emissions model, MOBILE6.2, in terms of quality of results and overall functionality.  It incorporates the latest emissions data, more sophisticated calculation algorithms, increased user flexibility, new software design, and significant new capabilities.  While these changes improve the quality of on-road mobile source inventories, the overall degree of change in the model's function also adds to the start-up time required for the transition from MOBILE6.2 to MOVES2010a.
      EPA developed MOVES as a completely new model.  Whereas MOBILE6.2 was written in FORTRAN and used simple text files for data input and output, MOVES2010a is written in JAVA and uses a relational database structure in MYSQL to handle input and output as data tables.  These changes make MOVES more flexible, and the analysis of new data incorporated within MOVES will enhance state and local agency understanding of how on-road mobile sources contribute to emissions inventories and the relative effectiveness of various control strategies.  However, this new model framework has created a significant learning curve for state and local agency staff that are required to use MOVES.
      In addition to the challenges of learning new software, state and local agencies also have to make substantial changes in the processes they have developed to create model input and apply model output.  While there were incremental changes between each previous version of the MOBILE model, the basic input and output structure of that model was essentially unchanged since the early 1980s.  Over time, state and local agencies developed their own methods for incorporating local inputs in MOBILE format and for post-processing MOBILE results for inventory development and air quality modeling.  To help state and local agencies with this part of the current transition, EPA created a number of tools that take input data formatted for MOBILE6.2 and convert that data for use in MOVES2010a.
      EPA anticipated many of these challenges when it released MOVES. In order to assist in this model transition, EPA and DOT have already provided hands-on MOVES training in many states.  Additional MOVES training for regional inventories has been requested, and will continue to be offered for the foreseeable future.  EPA continues to provide other technical assistance to state and local agencies via on-going conference calls with user groups, e-mail and phone support, a frequently asked questions web page, and web-based presentations.  All of these efforts are helping state and local agencies make the transition to MOVES2010a, and many agencies are making significant progress in applying the model for official purposes.  However, other state and local agencies are still developing the technical capacity to use MOVES2010a, and need more time to transition for future conformity determinations.
C.	Why Is EPA Conducting This Rulemaking?
      If finalized, today's action would provide additional time that may be critical for nonattainment and maintenance areas to learn and apply MOVES2010a for regional conformity analyses.  EPA has been contacted by several state and local transportation and air quality agencies and associations that are concerned that there has not been sufficient transition time for using MOVES2010a in regional conformity analyses.  These concerns revolve around the time needed to build technical capacity for using MOVES2010a as well as completing necessary SIP and/or transportation plan/TIP changes to assure conformity in the future.  Further details on today's action are provided below.
      Today's proposal would not affect EPA's previous approval of MOVES2010a for official SIP submissions developed outside of California.  Today's rulemaking would also not affect the existing grace period before MOVES2010a is required for PM2.5, PM10, and CO hot-spot analyses for project-level conformity determinations (75 FR 79370).  EPA coordinated closely with DOT in developing today's action, and DOT concurs on this proposed rule.
III.	Extension of MOVES2010a Regional Conformity Grace Period
   A.       Background
CAA section 176(c)(1) states that "...[t]he determination of conformity shall be based on the most recent estimates of emissions, and such estimates shall be determined from the most recent population, employment, travel, and congestion estimates...."  To meet this requirement, section 93.111 of the conformity rule requires that conformity determinations be based on the latest motor vehicle emissions model approved by EPA.  When EPA approves a new emissions model, EPA consults with DOT to establish a grace period before the model is required for conformity analyses (40 CFR 93.111(b)).  EPA must consider many factors when establishing a grace period for conformity determinations (40 CFR 93.111(b)(2)):
      "The length of the grace period will depend on the degree of change in the model and the scope of re-planning likely to be necessary for MPOs in order to assure conformity."
The conformity rule provides for a grace period for new emissions models of between three and 24 months (40 CFR 93.111(b)(1)).
In the preamble to the original 1993 conformity rule, EPA articulated its intentions for establishing the length of conformity grace period for a new emissions model (58 FR 62211):
         "EPA and DOT will consider extending the grace period if the effects of the new emissions model are so significant that previous SIP demonstrations of what emission levels are consistent with attainment would be substantially affected.  In such cases, states should have an opportunity to revise their SIPs before MPOs must use the model's new emissions factors.  EPA encourages all agencies to inform EPA of the impacts of new emissions models in their area, and EPA may pause to seek such input before determining the length of the grace period."
Section 93.111 conformity requirements have not changed since 1993, and have been implemented successfully for many previous model transitions.
      On March 2, 2010, EPA announced the official release of MOVES2010 and established a two-year grace period before this model was required for new regional conformity analyses (75 FR 9411).  Although the original grace period was established for MOVES2010, EPA clarified in September 2010 that the same grace period for regional conformity analyses also applies to MOVES2010a.  EPA based its decision to establish a two-year conformity grace period on the factors under section 93.111(b)(2), and advised areas to use the interagency consultation process to examine the impact of using MOVES in their future regional conformity analyses.
      Without further EPA action, MOVES2010a would be required for regional conformity analyses that begin after March 2, 2012.  As discussed further in today's action, the special circumstances of the transition from MOBILE to MOVES2010a require a reevaluation of the length of this conformity grace period.
B.	Description of Proposed Rule
       In today's action, EPA is proposing to provide an additional year before MOVES2010a is required for regional conformity analyses.  If finalized, MOVES2010a would be required for new regional conformity analyses that begin after March 2, 2013.  State and local agencies outside California would use MOVES2010a for regional conformity analyses earlier than March 2, 2013, if desired, and would be required to do so under limited circumstances such as after MOVES2010a SIP motor vehicle emissions budgets have been found adequate or approved for conformity purposes.
       EPA is proposing to add a new paragraph (b)(3) to section 93.111 of the conformity rule, and this provision would apply to MOVES2010a and any future minor revisions to this model that EPA releases before March 2, 2013.  Such minor revisions would not start a new grace period for regional conformity analyses and could include performance enhancements that reduce MOVES run time or model improvements to reduce errors in operating the model.  Any major model updates, such as an update that significantly changes MOVES results for criteria pollutant emissions, would be evaluated separately as a "new model" under conformity rule section 93.111.
Before the end of the extended conformity grace period (March 2, 2013), areas would use the interagency consultation process to examine how MOVES2010a would impact their future MPO transportation plan/TIP conformity determinations.  Isolated rural areas would also consider the impact of using MOVES2010a on future regional conformity analyses.  If finalized, agencies should carefully consider whether the SIP and its motor vehicle emissions budgets should be revised with MOVES2010a or if transportation plans and TIPs should be revised before the end of the conformity grace period, since doing so may be necessary to ensure conformity in the future.
      The proposal would allow regional conformity analyses that are started during the grace period to be based on either MOBILE6.2 or MOVES2010a.  If the grace period ended on March 2, 2013, MOVES2010a would become the only approved motor vehicle emissions model for regional conformity analyses outside California at that time.  This would mean that all new regional conformity analyses started after the end of the grace period must be based on MOVES2010a, even if the SIP is based on MOBILE6.2 or earlier versions of MOBILE.
       For complete explanations of how MOVES2010a is to be implemented for transportation conformity, including details about using MOVES2010a during the grace period, refer to EPA's existing MOVES policy guidance.
C.	Rationale
      MOVES2010a is EPA's best tool for estimating criteria pollutant emissions, and it is a significant improvement over previous MOBILE models.  State and local agencies have made significant progress to date in using MOVES2010a, and EPA supports these efforts and encourages that they continue.  However, as discussed above, challenges related to start-up and model application have been much greater in the transition to MOVES2010a, compared to past transitions between MOBILE model versions.  As a result, EPA has determined that a one-year extension of the MOVES2010a grace period is necessary for state and local agencies to complete the current transition.  Today's action would ensure that state and local governments have the necessary time to implement the conformity rule as originally intended.
      Since 1993, the fundamental purpose of section 93.111(b) of the conformity rule has been to provide a sufficient amount of time for MPOs and other state and local agencies to adapt to using new emissions tools.  As discussed above, the transition to a new emissions model for conformity involves more than learning to use the new model and preparing input data and model output.  After model start-up is complete, state and local agencies also need to consider how the model affects regional conformity analysis results and whether SIP and/or transportation plan/TIP changes are necessary to assure future conformity determinations.  EPA believes that the proposed one-time extension of the current MOVES2010a regional grace period is critical to assure future conformity determinations based on MOVES2010a.
      EPA has the discretion to establish an extended grace period for MOVES2010a, and today's action is consistent with CAA section 176(c)(1) requirements.  EPA believes that the proposal to provide one additional year is appropriate due to technical challenges in the transition from MOBILE6.2 to MOVES2010a.  This decision is consistent with the existing conformity criteria in section 93.111(b)(2) of the conformity rule that requires the length of the grace period to be based on "the degree of change in the model and the scope of re-planning likely to be necessary by MPOs in order to assure conformity."
      Today's proposal would not delay the use of MOVES2010a in SIP development or slow down past progress toward using the new model for regional conformity analyses.  As noted above, many state and local agencies are already learning and applying MOVES2010a.  Some are revising existing SIP budgets using the new model, while others may be incorporating MOVES2010a into new maintenance plans or clean data determinations.  Under EPA's existing MOVES policy guidance, new or revised SIP budgets must still be based on MOVES2010a.  For example, MOVES2010a continues to be required for attainment SIPs for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.  Under the proposal, MOVES2010a would also be required for any regional conformity analyses prior to March 2, 2013 if SIP budgets based on MOVES2010 or MOVES2010a are approved or found adequate sooner.
      In addition, today's action would not change the current MOVES2010a grace period for new PM2.5, PM10, and CO hot-spot analyses for project-level conformity determinations.  EPA noted previously that a two-year conformity grace period was necessary to apply MOVES2010a for hot-spot analyses (75 FR 79370).  However, the transition to MOVES2010a for project-level hot-spot analyses does not involve the complexity associated with the regional level, where SIP budgets and/or transportation plans/TIPs may need to be revised before regional conformity analyses based on MOVES2010a can be completed.
      Finally, EPA is not proposing to reopen as a general matter the process and length of conformity grace periods for future emissions model approvals.  The unique set of circumstances involved in the current transition warrants the proposed additional state and local flexibility before MOVES2010a is required for regional conformity analyses.
IV.	Conformity SIPs
      The proposed MOVES2010a regional grace period extension would apply on the effective date of a final rule in all nonattainment and maintenance areas.  Section 51.390(a) of the conformity rule states that the federal rule applies for the portion of the requirements that are not included in a state's approved conformity SIP.  Section 51.390(b) further allows state conformity provisions to contain criteria and procedures that are more stringent than the federal requirements.  However, in the case of states with conformity SIPs that include the grace period provision in 40 CFR 93.111(b)(1), EPA concludes that such states did not intend to require a shorter grace period than EPA, in consultation with DOT, believes is needed.  Therefore, since the MOVES2010a grace period extension would be a new provision being added to the conformity rule, it is not included in any current state conformity SIP and therefore would apply immediately, if finalized, in all areas pursuant to section 51.390(a).
      In addition, section 51.390(c) of the conformity rule requires states to submit a new or revised conformity SIP to EPA within 12 months of the Federal Register publication date of final conformity rules in certain situations.  States with approved conformity SIPs that are prepared in accordance with current CAA requirements would not be required to submit new conformity SIP revisions under a final rule, since section 93.111 of the conformity rule is not contained in these SIPs.  A conformity SIP prepared in accordance with current CAA requirements contains only the state's criteria and procedures for interagency consultation (40 CFR 93.105) and two additional provisions related to written commitments for certain control and mitigation measures (40 CFR 93.122(a)(4)(ii) and 93.125(c)).  However, states with approved conformity SIPs that include section 93.111 from a previous rulemaking would be required to submit a SIP revision within 12 months of the publication date of any final rule, although EPA strongly encourages these states to submit a SIP revision with only the three required provisions.  A state without an approved conformity SIP would not be required to submit a new conformity SIP within one year of a final rule, but previous conformity SIP deadlines continue to apply.
      For additional information on conformity SIPs, please refer to the January 2009 guidance entitled, "Guidance for Developing Transportation Conformity State Implementation Plans" available on EPA's website at:  www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/policy/420b09001.pdf.
V.	Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A.	Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
	Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is a "significant regulatory action."     Accordingly, EPA submitted this action to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011) and any changes made in response to OMB recommendations have been documented in the docket for this action.

B.	Paperwork Reduction Act
      This action would not impose any new information collection burden.  The information collection requirements of EPA's existing transportation conformity regulations and the proposed revisions in today's action are already covered by EPA information collection request (ICR) entitled, "Transportation Conformity Determinations for Federally Funded and Approved Transportation Plans, Programs and Projects."  OMB has previously approved the information collection requirements contained in the existing regulations at 40 CFR Part 93 under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and has assigned OMB control number 2060-0561.  The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR Part 9.
C.	Regulatory Flexibility Act
	The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an Agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of rules subject to notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute unless the Agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.  Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit organizations and small government jurisdictions.
	For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's proposal on small entities, small entity is defined as: (1) a small business as defined by the Small Business Administration's (SBA) regulations at 13 CFR 121.201; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town, school district or special district with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.  After considering the economic impacts of today's proposed rule on small entities, I certify that this action would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.  This proposal would directly affect federal agencies and MPOs that, by definition, are designated under federal transportation laws only for metropolitan areas with a population of at least 50,000.  These organizations do not constitute small entities within the meaning of the RFA.  Therefore, this proposal would not impose any requirements on small entities.
D.	Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
	This proposal does not contain a Federal mandate that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more for state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector in any one year.  This rule would merely implement already established law that imposes conformity requirements and would not itself impose requirements that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more in any year.  Thus, today's proposal is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
	This proposal is also not subject to the requirements of section 203 of UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments.  This proposal would not significantly or uniquely impact small governments because it directly affects federal agencies and MPOs that, by definition, are designated under federal transportation laws only for metropolitan areas with a population of at least 50,000.
E.	Executive Order 13132: Federalism
      This proposal does not have federalism implications.  It would not have substantial direct effects on states, on the relationship between the national government and states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132.  The CAA requires conformity to apply in certain nonattainment and maintenance areas as a matter of law, and today's action would merely revise one provision for transportation planning entities in subject areas to follow in meeting their existing statutory obligations.  Thus, EO 13132 does not apply to this proposal.
F.	Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments
 	This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).  The CAA requires transportation conformity to apply in any area that is designated nonattainment or maintenance by EPA.  Because today's proposal would not significantly or uniquely affect the communities of Indian tribal governments, EO 13175 does not apply to this action.
G.	Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children from Environmental Health and Safety Risks
      This proposal is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because the Agency does not believe the environmental health or safety risks addressed by this action present a disproportionate risk to children.
H.	Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
      This proposal is not a "significant energy action" as defined in Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 18355 (May 22, 2001)), because it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy.  It would not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency regarding energy.  This action is not subject to EO 13211 because it does not have any adverse energy effects.
I.	National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
      Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law No. 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical.  Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., material specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies.  The NTTAA directs EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards.  This proposal does not involve technical standards.  Therefore, EPA is not considering the use of any voluntary consensus standards.
J.	Executive Order 12898:  Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
      Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes federal executive policy on environmental justice.  Its main provision directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the United States.
	EPA has determined that this action would not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority or low-income populations.  The proposed rule involves a minor revision that provides administrative relief but does not change the conformity rule's underlying requirements for regional conformity analyses.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 93
Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Clean Air Act, Environmental protection, Highways and roads, Intergovernmental relations, Mass transportation, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Transportation, Volatile organic compounds.

DATED: _________________________________

_____________________________________________

Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26682-26683]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12453]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0295; FRL-9979-19-OAR]
RIN 2060-AT40, 2060-AT39, 2060-AT38, 2060-AT37, 2060-AT36

Response to Clean Air Act Section 126(b) Petitions From Delaware
and Maryland

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing that a
public hearing will be held on the EPA's proposed response to petitions
from Delaware and Maryland pursuant to section 126 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA or Act). The EPA is proposing to deny four CAA section 126(b)
petitions submitted by the state of Delaware and one CAA section 126(b)
petition submitted by the state of Maryland between July and November
2016. The hearing will be held on June 22, 2018, in Washington, DC.

DATES: The public hearing will be held on June 22, 2018, in Washington,
DC. Please refer to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for additional
information on the public hearing.

ADDRESSES:
    Public Hearing. The June 22, 2018, public hearing will be held at
the EPA, William Jefferson Clinton East Building, Room 1153, 1201
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004. Identification is
required. If your driver's license is issued by America Samoa, you must
present an additional form of identification to enter (see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for additional information on this location).
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be
publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Docket Center Reading Room,
William Jefferson Clinton West Building, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20004. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The phone

number for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you would like to speak at the
public hearing, please contact Ms. Pamela Long, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
(OAQPS), Air Quality Planning Division (C504-01), Research Triangle
Park, NC 27711, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email address [email protected], no later than June 20, 2018. If you
have any questions relating to the public hearing, please contact Ms.
Long.
    If you have questions concerning the petitions from Maryland and
Delaware, please contact Mr. Lev Gabrilovich, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
(OAQPS), Air Quality Planning Division, (C539-01), Research Triangle
Park, NC 27711, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The public hearing will provide interested
parties the opportunity to present data, views, or arguments concerning
the EPA's proposed response to the petitions from Maryland and
Delaware. The EPA may ask clarifying questions during the oral
presentations, but will not respond to the presentations at that time.
Written statements and supporting information that are submitted during
the comment period will be considered with the same weight as any oral
comments and supporting information presented at the public hearing.
Written comments must be postmarked by the last day of the comment
period.
    The public hearing will convene at 9:00 a.m. and end at 6:00 p.m.
Eastern Time (ET) or at least two hours after the last registered
speaker has spoken. The EPA will make every effort to accommodate all
individuals interested in providing oral testimony. A lunch break is
scheduled from 12:00 p.m. until 1:00 p.m. Please note that this hearing
will be held at a U.S. government facility. Individuals planning to
attend the hearing should be prepared to show valid picture
identification to the security staff in order to gain access to the
meeting room. The REAL ID Act, passed by Congress in 2005, established
new requirements for entering federal facilities. These requirements
took effect on July 21, 2014. If your driver's license is issued by
American Samoa, you must present an additional form of identification
to enter the federal building where the public hearing will be held.
Acceptable alternative forms of identification include: Federal
employee badges, passports, enhanced driver's licenses and military
identification cards. For additional information for the status of your
state regarding REAL ID, go to http://www.dhs.gov/real-id-enforcement-brief.
    If you would like to present oral testimony at the hearing, please
notify Ms. Pamela Long, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS), Air Quality Planning
Division (C504-01), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone (919)
541-0641, fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address [email protected], no
later than 4:00 p.m. ET on June 20, 2018. Ms. Long will arrange a
general time slot for you to speak. The EPA will make every effort to
follow the schedule as closely as possible on the day of the hearing.
    Oral testimony will be limited to 5 minutes for each commenter. The
EPA encourages commenters to provide the EPA with a copy of their oral
testimony electronically (via email) or in hard copy form. Commenters
should notify Ms. Long if they need specific translation services for
non-English speaking commenters.
    The hearing schedule, including the list of speakers, will be
posted on the EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution/ozone-national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs-section-126-petitions prior to the hearing. Verbatim transcripts of the hearing and
written statements will be included in the docket for the action.

How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0295 (available at http://www.regulations.gov). The
EPA has made available information related to the proposed action on
the following website: https://www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution/ozone-national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs-section-126-petitions.

    Dated: June 5, 2018.
Panagiotis Tsirigotis,
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2018-12453 Filed 6-7-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P