[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 56 (Friday, March 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17749-17750]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06613]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2008-0224]

Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Exemption
Renewal for Greyhound Lines, Inc.

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of exemption; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA renews Greyhound Lines, Inc.'s (Greyhound) exemption
which allows the placement of video event recorders at the top of the
windshields on its buses. Greyhound may continue to use the video event
recorders to increase safety through (1) Identification and remediation
of risky driving behaviors such as distracted driving and drowsiness;
(2) enhanced monitoring of passenger behavior; and (3) enhanced
collision review and analysis. The Agency has concluded that granting
this exemption renewal will maintain a level of safety that is
equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety achieved without
the exemption. However, the Agency requests comments on this issue,
especially from anyone who believes this standard will not be
maintained.

DATES: This decision is effective March 21, 2013. Comments must be
received on or before April 22, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments bearing the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) number FMCSA-by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Ground Floor, Room W12-140, DOT Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and
docket number for this notice. For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information on the exemption process, see the
``Public Participation'' heading below. Note that all comments received
will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided. Please see the ``Privacy Act''
heading for further information.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov or to Room W12-140,
DOT Building, New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) is available 24 hours each day, 365
days each year. If you want acknowledgement that we received your
comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope or postcard
or print the acknowledgement page that appears after submitting
comments on-line.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement for the FDMS published in the Federal
Register published on December 29, 2010 (73 FR 82132) or you may visit
http://edocket/access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-785.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brian J. Routhier, Vehicle and
Roadside Operations Division, Office of Bus and Truck Standards and
Operations, MC-PSV,<PHONE_NUMBER>, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315(b)(1), FMCSA may renew an
exemption from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations for a two-
year period if it finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would
be achieved absent such exemption.'' Greyhound has requested a two-year
extension for its exemption from 49 CFR 393.60(e). The procedures for
requesting an exemption (including renewals) are set out in 49 CFR part
381.

Basis for Renewing Exemption

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(1), an exemption may be granted for no
longer than two years from its approval date and may be renewed upon
application for additional two-year periods. On March 19, 2008,
Greyhound applied for an exemption from 49 CFR 393.60(e)(1) to allow it
to install video event

recorders on some or all of its bus fleet. On March 19, 2009, FMCSA
published a notice of final disposition in the Federal Register
granting the exemption (74 FR 11807). On March 22, 2011, FMCSA
published a notice of final disposition renewing this exemption until
March 20, 2013.The renewal outlined in this notice extends the
exemption through March 20, 2015, and requests public comment.
    FMCSA is not aware of any evidence showing that the installation of
video event recorders on Greyhound's buses, in accordance with the
conditions of the original exemption, has resulted in any degradation
in safety. The Agency believes that extending the exemption for a
period of two years will likely achieve a level of safety that is
equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety achieved without
the exemption because: (1) The video event recorders will not obstruct
drivers' views of the roadway, highway signs and surrounding traffic
due to the fact that the panoramic windshields installed on Greyhound's
buses encompass a large percentage of the front of buses and extend
well above the driver's sight lines; (2) larger windshield wipers
installed on Greyhound's buses increase the swept area well beyond that
which is recommended by SAE International's guidelines for commercial
vehicles; and (3) placement of video event recorders just below the
larger swept area of the wipers will be well outside of the driver's
useable sight lines. Finally, Greyhound installed DriveCam video event
recorders on 90 of its buses operated by their BoltBus division and
experienced a 27% reduction in collisions in 2011.

Request for Comments

    FMCSA requests comments from parties with data concerning the
safety record of CMVs operated by Greyhound and equipped with video
event recorders by April 22, 2013. The Agency will evaluate any adverse
evidence submitted and, if safety is being compromised or if
continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals
and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315(b)(1), FMCSA will take
immediate steps to revoke the Greyhound exemption.

    Issued on: March 18, 2013.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-06613 Filed 3-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 99 (Monday, May 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29758-29760]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12556]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0345]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Experimental Study on Consumer Responses to Nutrition
Facts Labels With Various Footnote Formats and Disclosure of Amounts of
Vitamins and Minerals

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information and
to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the notice. This
notice solicits comments on a study entitled ``Experimental Study on
Consumer Responses to Nutrition Facts Labels With Various Footnote
Formats and Disclosure of Amounts of Vitamins and Minerals.''

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by July 22, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Jr., Office of
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information before
submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether

the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of FDA's functions, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information
technology.

I. Experimental Study on Consumer Responses to Nutrition Facts Labels
With Various Footnote Formats and Disclosure of Amounts of Vitamins and
Minerals--(OMB Control Number 0910-New)

    Under the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 (Pub. L.
101-535), the Nutrition Facts label is required on most packaged foods,
and this information must be provided in a specific format in
accordance with the provisions of Sec.  101.9 (21 CFR 101.9). When FDA
was determining which Nutrition Facts label format to require, the
Agency undertook consumer research to evaluate alternatives (Refs. 1
through 3). More recently, FDA conducted qualitative consumer research
on the format of the Nutrition Facts label on behalf of the Agency's
Obesity Working Group (Ref. 4), which was formed in 2003 and tasked
with outlining a plan to help confront the problem of obesity in the
United States (Ref. 5). In addition to conducting consumer research, in
the Federal Register of November 2, 2007 (72 FR 62149) FDA issued an
advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) entitled, ``Food
Labeling: Revision of Reference Values and Mandatory Nutrients'' (the
2007 ANPRM), which requested comments on a variety of topics related to
a future proposed rule to update the presentation of nutrients and
content of nutrient values on food labels. In the 2007 ANPRM, the
Agency included a request for comments on how consumers use the percent
Daily Value in the Nutrition Facts label when evaluating the
nutritional content of food items and making purchases.
    Research has suggested that consumers use the Nutrition Facts label
in various ways, including, but not limited to, using the Nutrition
Facts label to determine if products are high or low in a specific
nutrient and to compare products (Ref. 6). One component of the
Nutrition Facts label that serves as an aid in these uses is the
percent Daily Value. Early consumer research indicated that the percent
Daily Value format improved consumers' abilities to make correct
dietary judgments about a food in the context of a total daily diet
(Ref. 3), which led FDA to require both quantitative and percentage
declarations of nutrient daily values in the Nutrition Facts label in
the 1993 Nutrition Labeling final rule (58 FR 2079, January 6, 1993).
    Research in subsequent years, however, suggested that consumers'
understanding and use of percent Daily Value may be somewhat
inconsistent (Refs. 7 and 8). Additionally, FDA has received several
public comments suggesting that further research on percent Daily
Values may be warranted, along with research on other modifications to
the Nutrition Facts label. Suggested research on potential
modifications includes research on: (1) The removal of the statements,
``Percent Daily Values are based on a 2,000 calorie diet. Your daily
values may be higher or lower depending on your calorie needs''; (2)
the removal of the table in the footnote that lists the Daily Values
for total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium, total carbohydrate,
and dietary fiber based on 2,000 and 2,500 calorie diets as described
in Sec.  101.9(d)(9); and (3) changes to the presentation of and amount
of information provided in the Nutrition Facts label. Therefore, FDA,
as part of its effort to promote public health, proposes to use this
study to explore consumer responses to various food label formats for
the footnote area of the Nutrition Facts label, including those that
exhibit information such as various definitions for percent Daily Value
and general guidelines for high and low nutrient levels. In addition,
the Agency will use this study to explore consumer responses to
inclusion of weight amount information in the declaration of vitamins
and minerals described in Sec.  101.9(c)(8)(ii) (i.e., vitamin A,
vitamin C, calcium, and iron), which may have potential health value to
consumers (Ref. 9).
    The proposed collection of information is a controlled, randomized,
experimental study. The study will use a Web-based survey, which will
take about 15 minutes to complete, to collect information from 10,000
English-speaking adult members of an online consumer panel maintained
by a contractor. The study will aim to recruit a sample that reflects
the U.S. Census on gender, education, age, and ethnicity/race.
    The study will randomly assign each of its participants to view a
total of three label images from a set of food labels that will be
created for the study and systematically varied in the presence or
absence of the following items: (1) A definition for percent Daily
Value, (2) a general guideline for ``high'' and ``low'' nutrient
levels, and (3) weight amounts for vitamins and minerals. Various
definitions for percent Daily Value may include, for example, ``The
percent Daily Value is the amount of a nutrient listed above that one
serving of this product contributes to the daily diet''; ``The percent
Daily Value is the amount of a nutrient listed above that one serving
of this product contributes to what you eat in a day''; and ``The
percent Daily Value is the amount of a nutrient listed above that one
serving of this product contributes to a 2,000 calorie diet.'' A sample
guideline for high and low nutrient levels may include, for example,
``A percent Daily Value that is 5 percent or less is low, and 20
percent or more is high.'' To correspond with FDA's other experimental
study of Nutrition Facts label formats described in the November 17,
2010, Federal Register (75 FR 70266), this study will evaluate
performance of the footnote statements in combination with single and
dual column labeling. Finally, the study will also examine effects of
including reference to FDA within the Nutrition Facts footnote. All
label images will be mock-ups resembling food labels that may be found
in the marketplace. Images will show product identity (e.g., potato
chips), but not any real or fictitious brand name.
    The survey will ask its participants to view label images and
answer questions about their understanding, perceptions, and reactions
related to the viewed label. The study will focus on the following
types of consumer reactions: (1) Judgments about a food product in
terms of its nutritional attributes and overall healthiness; (2)
ability to use the Nutrition Facts label to, for example, compare
products and calculate the number of servings of a product needed to
meet nutritional objectives; and (3) label perceptions (e.g.,
helpfulness and credibility). To help understand consumer reactions,
the study will also collect information on participants' background,
including but not limited to use of the Nutrition Facts label and
health status.
    The study is part of the Agency's continuing effort to enable
consumers to make informed dietary choices and construct healthful
diets. Results of the study will be used primarily to enhance the
Agency's understanding of how various potential modifications to the
Nutrition Facts label may affect how consumers perceive a product or a
label,

which may in turn affect their dietary choices. Results of the study
will not be used to develop population estimates.
    To help design and refine the questionnaire, FDA plans to conduct
cognitive interviews by screening 72 panelists in order to obtain 9
participants in the interviews. Each screening is expected to take 5
minutes (0.083 hour) and each cognitive interview is expected to take 1
hour. The total for cognitive interview activities is 15 hours (6 hours
+ 9 hours). Subsequently, we plan to conduct pretests of the
questionnaire before it is administered in the study. We expect that
1,600 invitations, each taking 2 minutes (0.033 hour), will need to be
sent to panelists to have 200 of them complete a 15-minute (0.25 hour)
pretest. The total for the pretest activities is 103 hours (53 hours +
50 hours). For the survey, we estimate that 80,000 invitations, each
taking 2 minutes (0.033 hour) to complete, will need to be sent to the
consumer panel to have 10,000 of its members complete a 15-minute (0.25
hour) questionnaire. The total for the survey activities is 5,140 hours
(2,640 hours + 2,500 hours). Thus, the total estimated burden is 5,258
hours. FDA's burden estimate is based on prior experience with research
that is similar to this proposed study.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                 Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Average
                                     Number of       Number of     Total annual     burden per
            Activity                respondents    responses per     responses     response  (in    Total hours
                                                    respondent                      hours) \2\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cognitive interview screener....              72               1              72            5/60               6
Cognitive interview.............               9               1               9               1               9
Pretest invitation..............           1,600               1           1,600            2/60              53
Pretest.........................             200               1             200           15/60              50
Survey invitation...............          80,000               1          80,000            2/60           2,640
Survey..........................          10,000               1          10,000           15/60           2,500
    Total.......................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............           5,258
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.
\2\ Burden estimates of less than 1 hour are expressed as a fraction of an hour in the format ``[number of
  minutes per response]/60''.

II. References

    The following references are on display in the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

1. Levy, A.S., Fein, S.B., and Schucker, R.E. ``Nutrition Labeling
Formats: Performance and Preference,'' Food Technology, 45: 116-121,
1991.
2. Levy, A.S., Fein, S.B., and Schucker, R.E. ``More Effective
Nutrition Label Formats Are Not Necessarily Preferred,'' Journal of
the American Dietetic Association, 92: 1230-1234, 1992.
3. Levy, A.S., Fein, S.B., and Schucker, R.E. ``Performance
Characteristics of Seven Nutrition Label Formats,'' Journal of
Public Policy and Marketing, 15: 1-15, 1996.
4. Lando, A.M. and Labiner-Wolfe, J. ``Helping Consumers to Make
More Healthful Food Choices: Consumer Views on Modifying Food Labels
and Providing Point-of-Purchase Nutrition Information at Quick-
Service Restaurants,'' Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior,
39: 157-163, 2007.
5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Calories Count: Report of the
Working Group on Obesity, 2004, available at http://www.fda.gov/Food/LabelingNutrition/ReportsResearch/ucm081696.htm.
6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. ``2008 Health and Diet
Survey--Preliminary Topline Frequencies (Weighted),'' 2010,
available at http://www.fda.gov/Food/ScienceResearch/ResearchAreas/ConsumerResearch/ucm193895.htm.
7. Li, F., Miniard, P.W., and Barone, M.J. ``The Facilitating
Influence of Consumer Knowledge on the Effectiveness of Daily Value
Reference Information,'' Journal of the Academy of Marketing
Science, 28: 425-436, 2000.
8. Levy, L., Patterson, R.E., Kristal, A.R., and Li, S.S. ``How Well
Do Consumers Understand Percentage Daily Value on Food Labels?''
American Journal of Health Promotion, 14: 157-160, 2000.
9. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes: Guiding
Principles for Nutrition Labeling and Fortification. Washington, DC:
National Academies Press, 2003.

    Dated: May 16, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-12556 Filed 5-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


The Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Applying Aluminum Parts --

Total Tin Data

Facility Name	City	State	Sample Date	Sample ID	Duplicate Indicator Constituent Name	Total Actual or Calculated	Analytical Method	Total Concentration Result	Units	Total Non-Detect Indicator	Total Detection Limit mg/kg	Total Detection Limit Data Qualifier	Description

DaimlerChrysler Jefferson North Assembly Plant	DETROIT	MI

JN-1	N	tin	actual

754	mg/kg

DaimlerChrysler Jefferson North Assembly Plant	DETROIT	MI

JN-2	N	tin	actual

780	mg/kg

DaimlerChrysler Jefferson North Assembly Plant	DETROIT	MI

JN-3	N	tin	actual

860	mg/kg

DaimlerChrysler Jefferson North Assembly Plant	DETROIT	MI

JN-4	N	tin	actual

666	mg/kg

DaimlerChrysler Jefferson North Assembly Plant	DETROIT	MI

JN-5	N	tin	actual

664	mg/kg

DaimlerChrysler Jefferson North Assembly Plant	DETROIT	MI

JN-6	N	tin	actual

804	mg/kg

DaimlerChrysler Jefferson North Assembly Plant	DETROIT	MI

JN-7	N	tin	actual

712	mg/kg

Ford MI Truck/Wayne Integrated Stamping & Assembly	WAYNE	MI

Drum #2	N	tin	actual

165	mg/kg

100

Ford MI Truck/Wayne Integrated Stamping & Assembly	WAYNE	MI

Drum #2 Duplicate	Y	tin	actual

148	mg/kg

100

Ford MI Truck/Wayne Integrated Stamping & Assembly	WAYNE	MI

Drum #3	N	tin	actual

119	mg/kg

100

Ford MI Truck/Wayne Integrated Stamping & Assembly	WAYNE	MI

Drum #4	N	tin	actual

134	mg/kg

100

Ford MI Truck/Wayne Integrated Stamping & Assembly	WAYNE	MI

Drum #5	N	tin	actual

103	mg/kg

100

Ford Wixom Assembly Plant	WIXOM	MI

Drum #1	N	tin	actual

138	mg/kg

100

Ford Wixom Assembly Plant	WIXOM	MI

Drum #2	N	tin	actual

154	mg/kg

100

Ford Wixom Assembly Plant	WIXOM	MI

Drum #2 Duplicate	Y	tin	actual

133	mg/kg

100

Ford Wixom Assembly Plant	WIXOM	MI

Drum #3	N	tin	actual

144	mg/kg

100

Ford Wixom Assembly Plant	WIXOM	MI

Drum #4	N	tin	actual

145	mg/kg

100

Ford Wixom Assembly Plant	WIXOM	MI

Drum #5	N	tin	actual

148	mg/kg

100

Ford Wixom Assembly Plant	WIXOM	MI

Drum #6	N	tin	actual

148	mg/kg

100

GM Flint Truck	FLINT	MI

FT-1	N	tin	actual

116	mg/kg

GM Flint Truck	FLINT	MI

FT-2	N	tin	actual

151	mg/kg

GM Flint Truck	FLINT	MI

FT-3	N	tin	actual

168	mg/kg

GM Flint Truck	FLINT	MI

FT-4	N	tin	actual

242	mg/kg

GM Flint Truck	FLINT	MI

FT-5	N	tin	actual

194	mg/kg

GM Flint Truck	FLINT	MI

FT-6	N	tin	actual

189	mg/kg

GM Flint Truck	FLINT	MI

FT-7	N	tin	actual

150	mg/kg

GM Grand River Plant	LANSING	MI

LGR-1	N	tin	actual

1250	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Grand River Plant	LANSING	MI

LGR-2	N	tin	actual

2000	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Grand River Plant	LANSING	MI

LGR-3	N	tin	actual

2120	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Grand River Plant	LANSING	MI

LGR-4	N	tin	actual

747	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Grand River Plant	LANSING	MI

LGR-5	N	tin	actual

497	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Grand River Plant	LANSING	MI

LGR-6	N	tin	actual

481	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Grand River Plant	LANSING	MI

LGR-7	N	tin	actual

2000	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H1-1	N	tin	actual

680	mg/kg

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H1-2	N	tin	actual

936	mg/kg

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H1-3	N	tin	actual

890	mg/kg

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H1-4	N	tin	actual

1040	mg/kg

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H1-5	N	tin	actual

681	mg/kg

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H1-6	N	tin	actual

707	mg/kg

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H1-7	N	tin	actual

925	mg/kg

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H2-1	N	tin	actual

186	mg/kg

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H2-2	N	tin	actual

171	mg/kg

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H2-3	N	tin	actual

184	mg/kg

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H2-4	N	tin	actual

197	mg/kg

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H2-5	N	tin	actual

194	mg/kg

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H2-6	N	tin	actual

228	mg/kg

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H2-7	N	tin	actual

275	mg/kg

GM Lansing Assembly Center	LANSING	MI	12/19/1997	LAN-S01-01	N	tin	actual Method 6020	355	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Lansing Assembly Center	LANSING	MI	12/19/1997	LAN-S01-02	N	tin	actual Method 6020	500	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Lansing Assembly Center	LANSING	MI	12/19/1997	LAN-S01-03	N	tin	actual Method 6020	438	mg/kg

GM Lansing Assembly Center	LANSING	MI	1/29/1998	LAN-S02-01	N	tin	actual Method 6020	2310	mg/kg

GM Lansing Assembly Center	LANSING	MI	1/29/1998	LAN-S02-02	N	tin	actual Method 6020	2040	mg/kg

GM Lansing Assembly Center	LANSING	MI	1/29/1998	LAN-S02-03	N	tin	actual Method 6020	2040	mg/kg

GM Lordstown Assembly Plant	LORDSTOWN	OH	12/16/1997	LOR-S01-01	N	tin actual

227	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Lordstown Assembly Plant	LORDSTOWN	OH	12/16/1997	LOR-S01-02	N	tin actual

222	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Lordstown Assembly Plant	LORDSTOWN	OH	12/16/1997	LOR-S01-03	N	tin actual

156	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Lordstown Assembly Plant	LORDSTOWN	OH	12/16/1997	LOR-S01-04	N	tin actual

262	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Lordstown Assembly Plant	LORDSTOWN	OH	12/16/1997	LOR-S01-05	N	tin actual

189	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Lordstown Assembly Plant	LORDSTOWN	OH	6/9/1998	LOR-S02-01	N	tin actual

609	mg/kg

GM Lordstown Assembly Plant	LORDSTOWN	OH	6/9/1998	LOR-S02-02	N	tin actual

251	mg/kg

GM Oklahoma City	OKLAHOMA CITY	OK	12/16/1997	OKL-S01-01	N	tin	actual

204	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Oklahoma City	OKLAHOMA CITY	OK	12/16/1997	OKL-S01-02	N	tin	actual

209	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Oklahoma City	OKLAHOMA CITY	OK	12/16/1997	OKL-S01-03	N	tin	actual

219	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Oklahoma City	OKLAHOMA CITY	OK	12/16/1997	OKL-S01-04	N	tin	actual

250	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Oklahoma City	OKLAHOMA CITY	OK	12/16/1997	OKL-S01-05	N	tin	actual

348	mg/kg

	J	Estimate

GM Oklahoma City	OKLAHOMA CITY	OK	6/11/1998	OKL-S02-01	N	tin	actual

236	mg/kg

GM Oklahoma City	OKLAHOMA CITY	OK	6/11/1998	OKL-S02-02	N	tin	actual

226	mg/kg

GM Oklahoma City	OKLAHOMA CITY	OK	6/11/1998	OKL-S02-03	N	tin	actual

241	mg/kg

GM Oklahoma City	OKLAHOMA CITY	OK	6/11/1998	OKL-S02-04	N	tin	actual

204	mg/kg

GM Oklahoma City	OKLAHOMA CITY	OK	6/11/1998	OKL-S02-05	N	tin	actual

212	mg/kg

GM Orion Assembly Center	LAKE ORION	MI	2/20/1995	UPCU 4103788/255-008 - RB-4	N	tin	actual

220	mg/kg

GM Orion Assembly Center	LAKE ORION	MI	2/20/1995	UPCU<PHONE_NUMBER>-007 - RB-3	N	tin	actual

180	mg/kg

GM Orion Assembly Center	LAKE ORION	MI	2/20/1995	UPCU 4108183/255-002 - RB-3-Dup	Y	tin	actual

210	mg/kg

GM Orion Assembly Center	LAKE ORION	MI	2/20/1995	UPCU 4108183/255-003 - RB-1	N	tin	actual

220	mg/kg

GM Orion Assembly Center	LAKE ORION	MI	2/20/1995	UPCU 4117098/255-004 - RB-2	N	tin	actual

210	mg/kg

GM Pontiac East Plant	PONTIAC	MI

PE-1	N	tin	actual

409	mg/kg

GM Pontiac East Plant	PONTIAC	MI

PE-2	N	tin	actual

394	mg/kg

GM Pontiac East Plant	PONTIAC	MI

PE-3	N	tin	actual

262	mg/kg

GM Pontiac East Plant	PONTIAC	MI

PE-4	N	tin	actual

312	mg/kg

GM Pontiac East Plant	PONTIAC	MI

PE-5	N	tin	actual

359	mg/kg

GM Pontiac East Plant	PONTIAC	MI

PE-6	N	tin	actual

500	mg/kg

GM Pontiac East Plant	PONTIAC	MI

PE-7	N	tin	actual

277	mg/kg

n 	82

	MAXIMUM	2310

	MEAN<PHONE_NUMBER>

	MEDIAN	241.5

	Std. Dev.<PHONE_NUMBER>

	90th Percentile	934.9

	50th Percentile	241.5