Sec.  63.988(c)(2) and the related recordkeeping requirements specified
in Sec.  63.998(a)(2)(ii)(B)(2) and (c)(2)(ii), you may elect to comply
with the requirements specified in paragraphs (k)(4)(i) through (iv) of
this section.
    (i) Monitor and record the inlet temperature as specified in
subpart SS of this part 63.
* * * * *
    (iv) Recording the downstream temperature and temperature
difference across the catalyst bed as specified in Sec.
63.998(a)(2)(ii)(B)(2) and (b)(2)(ii) is not required.
    (5) In addition to the monitoring and recordkeeping requirements
specified in Sec. Sec.  63.990(c)(1), 63.993(c)(1), and
63.998(a)(2)(ii)(C) for absorbers, you must use a flow meter capable of
providing a continuous record of the absorber influent liquid flow,
determine gas stream flow using one of the procedures specified in
Sec.  63.994(c)(1)(ii)(A) through (D), and record the absorber liquid-
to-gas ratio averaged over the time period of any performance test.
* * * * *
    5. Section 63.2460 is amended as follows:
    a. Revising paragraph (b) introductory text and paragraphs (b)(1)
and (b)(2);
    b. Redesignating paragraph (b)(4) as paragraph (b)(5) and amending
newly redesignated (b)(5) introductory text by revising ``paragraph
(b)(4)(i), (ii), or (iii)'' to read ``paragraph (b)(5)(i), (ii), or
(iii)'';
    c. Adding new paragraphs (b)(4), (b)(6), and (b)(7);
    d. Revising paragraph (c) introductory text, paragraph (c)(1),
paragraph (c)(2)(iii), and the first sentence in paragraph (c)(2)(v);
and
    e. Adding new paragraphs (c)(8) and (c)(9).
    The additions and revisions read as follows:

Sec.  63.2460  What requirements must I meet for batch process vents?

* * * * *
    (b) Group status. If a process has batch process vents, as defined
in Sec.  63.2550, you must determine the group status of the batch
process vents by determining and summing the uncontrolled organic HAP
emissions from each of the batch process vents within the process using
the procedures specified in Sec.  63.1257(d)(2)(i) and (ii), except as
specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (7) of this section.
    (1) To calculate emissions caused by the heating of a vessel
without a process condenser to a temperature lower than the boiling
point, you must use the procedures in Sec.  63.1257(d)(2)(i)(C)(3).
    (2) To calculate emissions from depressurization of a vessel
without a process condenser, you must use the procedures in Sec.
63.1257(d)(2)(i)(D)(10).
* * * * *
    (4) To calculate uncontrolled emissions when a vessel is equipped
with a process condenser, you must use the procedures in Sec.
63.1257(d)(3)(i)(B).
* * * * *
    (6) You may change from Group 2 to Group 1 in accordance with
either paragraph (b)(6)(i) or (ii) of this section. You must comply
with the requirements of this section and submit the test report in the
next Compliance report.
    (i) You may switch at anytime after operating as Group 2 for at
least one year so that you can show compliance with the 10,000 lb/yr
threshold for Group 2 batch process vents for at least 365 days before
the switch. You may elect to start keeping records of emissions from
Group 2 batch process vents before the compliance date. Report a switch
based on this provision in your next compliance report in accordance
with Sec.  63.2520(e)(10)(i).
    (ii) If the conditions in paragraph (b)(6)(i) of this section are
not applicable, you must provide a 60-day advance notice in accordance
with Sec.  63.2520(e)(10)(ii) before switching.
    (7) As an alternative to determining the uncontrolled organic HAP
emissions as specified in Sec.  63.1257(d)(2)(i) and (ii), you may
elect to demonstrate that non-reactive organic HAP usage in a process
is less than 10,000 lb/yr. You must provide data and supporting
rationale in your notification of compliance status report explaining
why the non-reactive organic HAP usage will be less than 10,000 lb/yr.
You must keep records of the non-reactive organic HAP usage as
specified in Sec.  63.2525(e)(2) and include

information in compliance reports as specified in Sec.
63.2520(e)(5)(iv).
    (c) Exceptions to the requirements in subparts SS and WW of this
part 63 are specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (9) of this section.
    (1) Process condensers. Process condensers, as defined in Sec.
63.2550(i), are not considered to be control devices for batch process
vents. You must determine whether a condenser is a control device for a
batch process vent or a process condenser from which the uncontrolled
HAP emissions are evaluated as part of the initial compliance
demonstration for each MCPU and report the results with supporting
rationale in your notification of compliance status report.
    (2) * * *
    (iii) As an alternative to conducting a performance test or design
evaluation to demonstrate initial compliance with a percent reduction
requirement for a condenser, you may determine controlled emissions
using the procedures specified in Sec.  63.1257(d)(3)(i)(B).
* * * * *
    (v) If a process condenser is used for any boiling operations, you
must demonstrate that it is properly operated according to the
procedures specified in Sec.  63.1257(d)(2)(i)(C)(4)(ii) and
(d)(3)(iii)(B), and the demonstration must occur only during the
boiling operation. * * *
* * * * *
    (8) Terminology. When the term ``storage vessel'' is used in
subpart WW of this part 63, the term ``process tank,'' as defined in
Sec.  63.2550(i), applies for the purposes of this section.
    (9) Requirements for a biofilter. If you use a biofilter to meet
either the 95 percent reduction requirement or outlet concentration
requirement specified in Table 2 to this subpart, you must meet the
requirements specified in paragraphs (c)(9)(i) through (iv) of this
section.
    (i) Operational requirements. The biofilter must be operated at all
times when emissions are vented to it.
    (ii) Performance tests. To demonstrate initial compliance, you must
conduct a performance test according to the procedures in Sec.  63.997
and paragraphs (c)(9)(ii)(A) through (D) of this section. The design
evaluation option for small control devices is not applicable if you
use a biofilter.
    (A) Keep up-to-date, readily accessible continuous records of
either the biofilter bed temperature averaged over the full period of
the performance test or the outlet total organic HAP or TOC
concentration averaged over the full period of the performance test.
Include these data in your notification of compliance status report as
required by Sec.  63.999(b)(3)(ii).
    (B) Record either the percent reduction of total organic HAP
achieved by the biofilter determined as specified in Sec.
63.997(e)(2)(iv) or the concentration of TOC or total organic HAP
determined as specified in Sec.  63.997(e)(2)(iii) at the outlet of the
biofilter, as applicable.
    (C) If you monitor the biofilter bed temperature, you may elect to
use multiple thermocouples in representative locations throughout the
biofilter bed and calculate the average biofilter bed temperature
across these thermocouples prior to reducing the temperature data to 15
minute (or shorter) averages for purposes of establishing operating
limits for the biofilter. If you use multiple thermocouples, include
your rationale for their site selection in your notification of
compliance status report.
    (D) Submit a performance test report as specified in Sec.
63.999(a)(2)(i) and (ii). Include the records from paragraph
(c)(9)(ii)(B) of this section in your performance test report.
    (iii) Monitoring requirements. Use either a biofilter bed
temperature monitoring device (or multiple devices) capable of
providing a continuous record or an organic monitoring device capable
of providing a continuous record. Keep records of temperature
monitoring results as specified in Sec.  63.998(b) and (c), as
applicable. General requirements for monitoring and continuous
temperature monitoring systems are contained in Sec.  63.996, and
requirements for using a CEMS are specified in Sec.  63.2450(j) and
Table 12 to this subpart. If you monitor temperature, the operating
temperature range must be based on only the temperatures measured
during the performance test; these data may not be supplemented by
engineering assessments or manufacturer's recommendations as otherwise
allowed in Sec.  63.999(b)(3)(ii)(A). If you establish the operating
range (minimum and maximum temperatures) using data from previous
performance tests in accordance with Sec.  63.996(c)(6), replacement of
the biofilter media with the same type of media is not considered a
process change under Sec.  63.997(b)(1). You may expand your biofilter
bed temperature operating range by conducting a repeat performance test
that demonstrates compliance with the 95 percent reduction requirement
or outlet concentration limit, as applicable.
    (iv) Repeat performance tests. You must conduct a repeat
performance test using the applicable methods specified in Sec.  63.997
within 2 years following the previous performance test and within 150
days after each replacement of any portion of the biofilter bed media
with a different type of media or each replacement of more than 50
percent (by volume) of the biofilter bed media with the same type of
media.
    6. Section 63.2465 is amended by revising the section heading,
paragraph (b), and paragraph (d) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.2465  What requirements must I meet for process vents that
emit hydrogen halide and halogen HAP or HAP metals?

* * * * *
    (b) If any process vents within a process emit hydrogen halide and
halogen HAP, you must determine and sum the uncontrolled hydrogen
halide and halogen HAP emissions from each of the process vents within
the process using the procedures specified in Sec.  63.1257(d)(2)(i)
and/or (ii), as appropriate.
* * * * *
    (d) To demonstrate compliance with the emission limit in Table 3 to
this subpart for HAP metals at a new source, you must comply with
paragraphs (d)(1) through (3) of this section.
    (1) Determine the mass emission rate of HAP metals based on process
knowledge, engineering assessment, or test data.
    (2) Conduct an initial performance test of each control device that
is used to comply with the emission limit for HAP metals specified in
Table 3 to this subpart. Conduct the performance test according to the
procedures in Sec.  63.997. Use Method 29 of appendix A of 40 CFR part
60 to determine the HAP metals at the inlet and outlet of each control
device, or use Method 5 of appendix A of 40 CFR part 60 to determine
the total particulate matter at the inlet and outlet of each control
device. You have demonstrated initial compliance if the overall
reduction of either HAP metals or total PM from the process is greater
than or equal to 97 percent by weight.
    (3) Comply with the monitoring requirements specified in Sec.
63.1366(b)(1)(xi) for each fabric filter used to control HAP metals.

Sec.  63.2470  [Amended]

    7. Section 63.2470 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph
(b).

Sec.  63.2475  [Amended]

    8. Section 63.2475 is amended by removing paragraph (c).
    9. Section 63.2480 is revised to read as follows:

Sec.  63.2480  What requirements must I meet for equipment leaks?

    (a) You must meet each requirement in Table 6 to this subpart that
applies to your equipment leaks, except as specified in paragraph (b)
or (c) of this section.
    (b) If you comply with subpart UU of this part 63, you may elect to
comply with the provisions in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this
section as an alternative to the referenced provisions in subpart UU.
    (1) The requirements for pressure testing in Sec.  63.1036(b) may
be applied to all processes, not just batch processes.
    (2) For the purposes of this subpart, pressure testing for leaks in
accordance with Sec.  63.1036(b) is not required after reconfiguration
of an equipment train if flexible hose connections are the only
disturbed equipment.
    (3) For an existing source, you are not required to develop an
initial list of identification numbers for connectors as would
otherwise be required under Sec.  63.1022(b)(1).
    (4) For connectors in gas/vapor and light liquid service at an
existing source, you may elect to comply with the requirements in Sec.
63.1029 for connectors in heavy liquid service, including all
associated recordkeeping and reporting requirements, rather than the
requirements of Sec.  63.1027.
    (c) If you comply with 40 CFR part 65, subpart F, you may elect to
comply with the provisions in paragraphs (c)(1) through (6) of this
section as an alternative to the referenced provisions in 40 CFR part
65, subpart F.
    (1) The requirements for pressure testing in Sec.  65.117(b) may be
applied to all processes, not just batch processes.
    (2) For the purposes of this subpart, pressure testing for leaks in
accordance with Sec.  65.117(b) is not required after reconfiguration
of an equipment train if flexible hose connections are the only
disturbed equipment.
    (3) For an existing source, you are not required to develop an
initial list of identification numbers for connectors as would
otherwise be required under Sec.  65.103(b)(1).
    (4) You may elect to comply with the monitoring and repair
requirements specified in Sec.  65.108(e)(3) as an alternative to the
requirements specified in Sec.  65.108(a) through (d) for any
connectors at your affected source.
    (5) When 40 CFR part 65, subpart F refers to the implementation
date specified in Sec.  65.1(f), it means the compliance date specified
in Sec.  63.2445.
    (6) When Sec. Sec.  65.105(f) and 65.117(d)(3) refer to Sec.  65.4,
it means Sec.  63.2525.
    (7) When Sec.  65.120(a) refers to Sec.  65.5(d), it means Sec.
63.2515.
    (8) When Sec.  65.120(b) refers to Sec.  65.5(e), it means Sec.
63.2520.
    10. Section 63.2485 is amended by revising paragraph (a) and
paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) and by adding new paragraphs (m), (n),
and (o) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.2485  What requirements must I meet for wastewater streams and
liquid streams within an MCPU?

    (a) You must meet each requirement in Table 7 to this subpart that
applies to your wastewater streams and liquid streams in open systems
within an MCPU, except as specified in paragraphs (b) through (o) of
this section.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) The total annual average concentration of compounds in Table 8
to this subpart is greater than or equal to 10,000 ppmw at any
flowrate, and the total annual load of compounds in Table 8 to this
subpart is greater than or equal to 200 lb/yr.
    (2) The total annual average concentration of compounds in Table 8
to this subpart is greater than or equal to 1,000 ppmw, and the annual
average flowrate is greater than or equal to 1 l/min.
    (3) The combined total annual average concentration of compounds in
Tables 8 and 9 to this subpart is greater than or equal to 30,000 ppmw,
and the combined total annual load of compounds in Tables 8 and 9 to
this subpart is greater than or equal to 1 tpy.
* * * * *
    (m) When Sec.  63.132(f) refers to ``a concentration of greater
than 10,000 ppmw of Table 9 compounds,'' it means ``a concentration of
greater than 30,000 ppmw of total partially soluble HAP (PSHAP) and
soluble HAP (SHAP) or greater than 10,000 ppmw of PSHAP'' for the
purposes of this subpart.
    (n) Alternative requirements for wastewater that is Group 1 for
soluble HAP only. The option specified in this paragraph (n) applies to
wastewater that is Group 1 for soluble HAP in accordance with paragraph
(c)(3) of this section and is discharged to biological treatment.
Except as provided in paragraph (n)(4) of this section, this option
does not apply to wastewater that is Group 1 for partially soluble HAP
in accordance with paragraph (c)(1), (2), or (4) of this section. For
wastewater that is Group 1 for soluble HAP, you need not comply with
Sec. Sec.  63.133 through 63.137 for any equalization unit,
neutralization unit, and/or clarifier prior to the activated sludge
unit, and you need not comply with the venting requirements in Sec.
63.136(e)(2)(ii)(A) for lift stations with a volume larger than 10,000
gal, provided you comply with the requirements specified in paragraphs
(n)(1) through (3) of this section and all otherwise applicable
requirements specified in Table 7 to this subpart. For this option, the
treatment requirements in Sec.  63.138 and the performance testing
requirements in Sec.  63.145 do not apply to the biological treatment
unit, except as specified in paragraphs (n)(2)(i) through (iv) of this
section.
    (1) Wastewater must be hard-piped between the equalization unit,
clarifier, and activated sludge unit. This requirement does not apply
to the transfer between any of these types of units that are part of
the same structure and one unit overflows into the next.
    (2) Calculate the destruction efficiency of the biological
treatment unit using Equation 1 of this section in accordance with the
procedures described in paragraphs (n)(2)(i) through (vi) of this
section. You have demonstrated initial compliance if E is greater than
or equal to 90 percent.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP08DE05.000

Where:
E = Destruction efficiency of total PSHAP and SHAP for the biological
treatment unit including the equalization unit, neutralization unit,
and/or clarifier, percent
QMWa = mass flow rate of total PSHAP and SHAP compounds
entering the equalization unit (or whichever of the three types of
units is first), kg/hr
QMGe = mass flow rate of total PSHAP and SHAP compounds
emitted from the equalization unit, kg/hr

QMGn = mass flow rate of total PSHAP and SHAP compounds
emitted from the neutralization unit, kg/hr
QMGc = mass flow rate of total PSHAP and SHAP compounds
emitted from the clarifier, kg/hr
Fbio = Site-specific fraction of PSHAP and SHAP compounds
biodegraded in the biological treatment unit

    (i) Include all PSHAP and SHAP compounds in both Group 1 and Group
2 wastewater streams from all MCPUs, except you may exclude any
compounds that meet the criteria specified in Sec.  63.145(a)(6)(ii) or
(iii).
    (ii) Conduct the demonstration under representative process unit
and treatment unit operating conditions in accordance with Sec.
63.145(a)(3) and (4).
    (iii) Determine PSHAP and SHAP concentrations and the total
wastewater flow rate at the inlet to the equalization unit in
accordance with Sec.  63.145(f)(1) and (2). References in Sec.
63.145(f)(1) and (2) to RMR and AMR do not apply for the purposes of
this section.
    (iv) Determine Fbio for the activated sludge unit as
specified in Sec.  63.145(h), except as specified in paragraph
(n)(2)(iv)(A) or (B) of this section.
    (A) If the biological treatment process meets both of the
requirements specified in Sec.  63.145(h)(1)(i) and (ii), you may elect
to replace the Fbio term in Equation 1 of this section with
the numeral ``1.''
    (B) You may elect to assume Fbio is zero for any
compounds on List 2 of Table 36 in subpart G.
    (v) Determine QMGe, QMGn, and QMGc
using EPA's WATER9 model or the most recent update to this model, and
conduct testing or use other procedures to validate the modeling
results.
    (vi) Submit the data and results of your demonstration, including
both a description of and the results of your WATER9 modeling
validation procedures, in your notification of compliance status report
as specified in Sec.  63.2520(d)(2)(ii).
    (3) As an alternative to the venting requirements in Sec.
63.136(e)(2)(ii)(A), a lift station with a volume larger than 10,000
gal may have openings necessary for proper venting of the lift station.
The size and other design characteristics of these openings may be
established based on manufacturer recommendations or engineering
judgment for venting under normal operating conditions. You must
describe the design of such openings and your supporting calculations
and other rationale in your notification of compliance status report.
    (4) For any wastewater streams that are Group 1 for both PSHAP and
SHAP, you may elect to meet the requirements specified in Table 7 to
this subpart for the PSHAP and then comply with paragraphs (n)(1)
through (3) of this section for the SHAP in the wastewater system. You
may determine the SHAP mass removal rate, in kg/hr, in treatment units
that are used to meet the requirements for PSHAP and add this amount to
both the numerator and denominator in equation 1 of this section.
    (o) Compliance records. (1) If you use a flare to meet a
requirement specified in Table 7 to this subpart, you must keep records
of the times and durations of all periods during which the pilot flame
monitor is not operating. This information must be submitted in the
compliance reports as specified in Sec.  63.2520(e)(5)(iii)(A).
    (2) For each CPMS used to monitor a nonflare control device for
wastewater emissions, you must keep records as specified in Sec.
63.998(c)(1) in addition to the records required in Sec.  63.147(d).
    11. Section 63.2520 is amended as follows:
    a. Revising paragraph (c)(4);
    b. Revising paragraph (d)(2)(i);
    c. Revising paragraphs (e)(5) introductory text, (e)(5)(ii)(C), and
(e)(5)(iii)(K) and adding new paragraph (e)(5)(iv);
    d. Revising paragraph (e)(9); and
    e. Revising the first two sentences of paragraph (e)(10)(i) and
paragraph (e)(10)(ii)(C).
    The additions and revisions read as follows:

Sec.  63.2520  What reports must I submit and when?

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (4) Data and rationale used to support an engineering assessment to
calculate uncontrolled emissions in accordance with Sec.
63.1257(d)(2)(ii). This requirement does not apply if you determine the
total HAP concentration to be less than 50 ppmv or if you use previous
test data to establish the uncontrolled emissions.
    (d) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (i) The results of any applicability determinations, emission
calculations, or analyses used to identify and quantify HAP usage or
HAP emissions from the affected source.
* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (5) The compliance report must contain the information on
deviations, as defined in Sec.  63.2550, according to paragraphs
(e)(5)(i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) of this section.
* * * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (C) Operating logs of processes with batch vents for the day(s)
during which the deviation occurred, except operating logs are not
required for deviations of the work practice standards for equipment
leaks.
    (iii) * * *
    (K) Operating logs of processes with batch vents for each day(s)
during which the deviation occurred.
* * * * *
    (iv) If you documented in your notification of compliance status
report that an MCPU has Group 2 batch process vents because the non-
reactive HAP usage is less than 10,000 lb/yr, the total uncontrolled
organic HAP emissions from the batch process vents in an MCPU will be
less than 1,000 lb/yr for the anticipated number of standard batches,
or total uncontrolled hydrogen halide and halogen HAP emissions from
all batch process vents and continuous process vents in a process are
less than 1,000 lb/yr, include the records associated with each
calculation required by Sec.  63.2525(e) that exceeds an applicable HAP
usage or emissions threshold.
* * * * *
    (9) Applicable records and information for periodic reports as
specified in referenced subparts F, G, SS, WW, and GGG of this part and
subpart F of 40 CFR part 65.
    (10) * * *
    (i) Except as specified in paragraph (e)(10)(ii) of this section,
whenever you make a process change, or change any of the information
submitted in the notification of compliance status report or a previous
compliance report, that is not within the scope of an existing
operating scenario, you must document the change in your compliance
report. A process change does not include moving within a range of
conditions identified in the standard batch, and a nonstandard batch
does not constitute a process change. * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (C) A change from Group 2 to Group 1 for any emission point except
for batch process vents that meet the conditions specified in Sec.
63.2460(b)(6)(i).
    12. Section 63.2525 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (c), and
(e) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.2525  What records must I keep?

    (a) Each applicable record required by subpart A of this part 63
and in referenced subparts F, G, SS, WW, and GGG of this part 63 and in
referenced subpart F of 40 CFR part 65.
* * * * *

    (c) A schedule or log of operating scenarios for processes with
batch vents updated each time a different operating scenario is put
into effect.
* * * * *
    (e) The information specified in paragraph (e)(2), (3), or (4) of
this section, as applicable, for each process with Group 2 batch
process vents or uncontrolled hydrogen halide and halogen HAP emissions
from the sum of all batch and continuous process vents less than 1,000
lb/yr. No records are required for situations described in paragraph
(e)(1) of this section.
    (1) No records are required if you documented in your notification
of compliance status report that the MCPU meets any of the situations
described in paragraph (e)(1)(i), (ii), or (iii) of this section.
    (i) The MCPU does not process, use, or produce HAP.
    (ii) You control the Group 2 batch process vents using a flare that
meets the requirements of Sec.  63.987.
    (iii) You control the Group 2 batch process vents using a control
device for which your determination of worst case for initial
compliance includes the contribution of all Group 2 batches.
    (2) If you documented in your notification of compliance status
report that an MCPU has Group 2 batch process vents because the non-
reactive organic HAP usage is less than 10,000 lb/yr, as specified in
Sec.  63.2460(b)(7), you must keep records of the amount of HAP
material used, and calculate the daily rolling annual sum of the amount
used no less frequently than monthly. If a record indicates usage
exceeds 10,000 lb/yr, you must estimate emissions for the preceding 12
months based on the number of batches operated and the estimated
emissions for a standard batch, and you must begin recordkeeping as
specified in paragraph (e)(4) of this section. After 1 year, you may
revert to recording only usage if the usage during the year is less
than 10,000 lb.
    (3) If you documented in your notification of compliance status
report that total uncontrolled organic HAP emissions from the batch
process vents in an MCPU will be less than 1,000 lb/yr for the
anticipated number of standard batches, then you must keep records of
the number of batches operated and calculate a daily rolling annual sum
of batches operated no less frequently than monthly. If the number of
batches operated results in organic HAP emissions that exceed 1,000 lb/
yr, you must estimate emissions for the preceding 12 months based on
the number of batches operated and the estimated emissions for a
standard batch, and you must begin recordkeeping as specified in
paragraph (e)(4) of this section. After one year, you may revert to
recording only the number of batches if the number of batches operated
during the year results in less than 1,000 lb of organic HAP emissions.
    (4) If you meet none of the conditions specified in paragraphs
(e)(1) through (3) of this section, you must keep records of the
information specified in paragraphs (e)(4)(i) through (iv) of this
section.
    (i) A record of the day each batch was completed and/or the
operating hours per day for continuous operations with hydrogen halide
and halogen emissions.
    (ii) A record of whether each batch operated was considered a
standard batch.
    (iii) The estimated uncontrolled and controlled emissions for each
batch that is considered to be a nonstandard batch.
    (iv) Records of the daily 365-day rolling summations of emissions,
or alternative records that correlate to the emissions (e.g., number of
batches), calculated no less frequently than monthly.
* * * * *
    13. Section 63.2535 is amended by revising paragraph (k) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.2535  What compliance options do I have if part of my plant is
subject to both this subpart and another subpart?

* * * * *
    (k) Compliance with 40 CFR part 60, subpart VV, and 40 CFR part 61,
subpart V. After the compliance date specified in Sec.  63.2445, if you
have an affected source with equipment that is also subject to the
requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart VV, or 40 CFR part 61, subpart
V, you may elect to apply this subpart to all such equipment. If you
elect this method of compliance, you must consider all total organic
compounds, minus methane and ethane, in such equipment for purposes of
compliance with this subpart, as if they were organic HAP. Compliance
with the provisions of this subpart, in the manner described in this
paragraph (k), will constitute compliance with 40 VFR part 60, subpart
VV and 40 CFR part 61, subpart V, as applicable.
* * * * *
    14. Section 63.2550 is amended as follows:
    a. Removing and reserving paragraphs (b) and (c);
    b. Revising the last sentence in paragraph (i) introductory text;
    c. Revising paragraph (8) in the definition of the term ``batch
process vent'' in paragraph (i);
    d. Adding new paragraphs (6) and (7) to the definition of the term
``continuous process vent'' in paragraph (i);
    e. Revising the definition of the term ``Group 1 continuous process
vent'' in paragraph (i);
    f. Adding new paragraph (6) to the definition of the term
``miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing process'' in paragraph
(i);
    g. Revising the definition of the term ``surge control vessel'' in
paragraph (i);
    h. Revising the introductory text of the definition of the term
``wastewater'' in paragraph (i); and
    i. Adding, in alphabetical order, new definitions for the terms
``biofilter,'' ``continuous operation,'' ``halogen atoms,'' ``HAP
metals,'' and ``process condenser'' in paragraph (i).
    The additions and revisions read as follows:

Sec.  63.2550  What definitions apply to this subpart?

* * * * *
    (i) * * * If a term is defined in Sec.  63.2, Sec.  63.101, Sec.
63.111, Sec.  63.981, Sec.  63.1061, Sec.  63.1251, or Sec.  65.2 and
in this paragraph (i), the definition in this paragraph (i) applies for
the purposes of this subpart.
* * * * *
    Batch process vent * * *
    (8) Emission streams from emission episodes that are undiluted and
uncontrolled containing less than 50 ppmv HAP are not part of any batch
process vent. A vent from a unit operation, or a vent from multiple
unit operations that are manifolded together, from which total
uncontrolled HAP emissions are less than 200 lb/yr is not a batch
process vent; emissions for all emission episodes associated with the
unit operation(s) must be included in the determination of the total
mass emitted. The HAP concentration or mass emission rate may be
determined using any of the following: Process knowledge that no HAP
are present in the emission stream; an engineering assessment as
discussed in Sec.  63.1257(d)(2)(ii), except that you do not need to
demonstrate that the equations in Sec.  63.1257(d)(2)(i) do not apply,
and the precompliance reporting requirements specified in Sec.
63.1257(d)(2)(ii)(E) do not apply for the purposes of this
demonstration; equations specified in Sec.  63.1257(d)(2)(i), as
applicable; test data using Method 18 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A; or
any other test method that has been validated according to the
procedures in Method 301 of appendix A of this part.
* * * * *
    Biofilter means an enclosed control system such as a tank or series
of tanks

with a fixed roof that contact emissions with a solid media (such as
bark) and use microbiological activity to transform organic pollutants
in a process vent stream to innocuous compounds such as carbon dioxide,
water, and inorganic salts. Wastewater treatment processes such as
aeration lagoons or activated sludge systems are not considered to be
biofilters.
* * * * *
    Continuous operation means any operation that is not a batch
operation.
* * * * *
    Continuous process vent * * *
    (6) The references to an ``air oxidation reactor, distillation
unit, or reactor'' in Sec.  63.107 mean any continuous operation for
the purposes of this subpart.
    (7) If a gas stream that originates as a continuous flow from a
continuous operation is combined with gas streams from other process
operations, but not items in Sec.  63.107(h), the determination of
whether the gas stream is a continuous process vent must be made at a
point prior to the combination of the gas streams. The phrase ``point
of discharge to the atmosphere (or the point of entry to a control
device, if any)'' in Sec.  63.107(c), (d), and (f) means ``a point
prior to the combination of the gas streams'' when such gas streams are
combined.
* * * * *
    Group 1 continuous process vent means a continuous process vent for
which the flow rate is greater than or equal to 0.005 standard cubic
meter per minute, and the total resource effectiveness index value,
calculated according to Sec.  63.2455(b), is less than or equal to 1.9
at an existing source and less than or equal to 5.0 at a new source.
* * * * *
    Halogen atoms mean chlorine and fluorine.
* * * * *
    HAP metals means the metal portion of antimony compounds, arsenic
compounds, beryllium compounds, cadmium compounds, chromium compounds,
cobalt compounds, lead compounds, manganese compounds, mercury
compounds, nickel compounds, and selenium compounds.
* * * * *
    Miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing process * * *
    (6) The end of a process that produces a solid material is either
up to and including the dryer or, for a polymer production process
without a dryer, up to and including the extruder or die plate, except
in two cases. If the dryer, extruder, or die plate is followed by an
operation that is designed and operated to remove HAP solvent or
residual HAP monomer from the solid, then the solvent removal operation
is the last step in the process. If the dried solid is diluted or mixed
with a HAP-based solvent, then the solvent removal operation is the
last step in the process.
* * * * *
    Process condenser means a condenser whose primary purpose is to
recover material as an integral part of an MCPU. A primary condenser or
condensers in series are considered to be integral to the MCPU if they
are capable of and normally used for the purpose of recovering
chemicals for fuel value (i.e., net positive heating value) use, reuse
or for sale for fuel value use, or reuse. All condensers recovering
condensate from an MCPU at or above the boiling point or all condensers
in line prior to a vacuum source are considered process condensers.
* * * * *
    Surge control vessel means feed drums, recycle drums, and
intermediate vessels as part of any continuous operation. Surge control
vessels are used within an MCPU when in-process storage, mixing, or
management of flowrates or volumes is needed to introduce material into
continuous operations.
* * * * *
    Wastewater means water that is discarded from an MCPU through a POD
and that contains either: an annual average concentration of compounds
in Tables 8 and 9 to this subpart of at least 5 ppmw and has an annual
average flowrate of 0.02 liters per minute or greater; or an annual
average concentration of compounds in Tables 8 and 9 to this subpart of
at least 10,000 ppmw at any flowrate. Wastewater means process
wastewater or maintenance wastewater. The following are not considered
wastewater for the purposes of this subpart: * * *
* * * * *
    15. Table 2 to subpart FFFF of part 63 is amended by revising entry
1 to read as follows:

 Table 2 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63.--Emission Limits and Work Practice
                    Standards for Batch Process Vents
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       For each . . .          Then you must . . .   And you must . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Process with Group 1       a. Reduce collective  Not applicable.
 batch process vents.          uncontrolled
                               organic HAP
                               emissions from the
                               sum of all batch
                               process vents
                               within the process
                               by >=98 percent by
                               weight by venting
                               emissions from a
                               sufficient number
                               of the vents
                               through a closed-
                               vent system to any
                               combination of
                               control devices.
                               (except a flare);
                               or
                              b. Reduce collective  Not applicable.
                               uncontrolled
                               organic HAP
                               emissions from the
                               sum of all batch
                               process vents
                               within the process
                               by >=95 percent by
                               weight by venting
                               emissions from a
                               sufficient number
                               of the vents
                               through a closed-
                               vent system to any
                               combination of
                               recovery devices or
                               a biofilter, except
                               you may elect to
                               comply with the
                               requirements of
                               subpart WW of this
                               part for any
                               process tank; or.
                              c. Reduce             For all other batch
                               uncontrolled          process vents
                               organic HAP           within the process,
                               emissions from one    reduce collective
                               or more batch         organic HAP
                               process vents         emissions as
                               within the process    specified in item
                               by venting through    1.a and/or item 1.b
                               a closed-vent         of this table.
                               system to a flare
                               or by venting
                               through a closed-
                               vent to any
                               combination of
                               control devices
                               (excluding a flare)
                               that reduce organic
                               HAP to an outlet
                               concentration < =20
                               ppmv as TOC or
                               total organic HAP.

                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    16. Table 3 to subpart FFFF of part 63 is revised to read as
follows:

Table 3 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63.--Emission Limits for Hydrogen Halide
  and Halogen HAP Emissions or HAP Metals Emissions From Process Vents
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             For each . . .                       You must . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Process with uncontrolled hydrogen    a. Reduce collective hydrogen
 halide and halogen HAP emissions from    halide and halogen HAP with
 process vents >=1,000 lb/yr.             emissions by >=99 percent by
                                          weight or to an outlet
                                          concentration < =20 ppmv by
                                          venting through a closed-vent
                                          system to any combination of
                                          control devices, or
                                         b. Reduce the halogen atom mass
                                          emission rate to < =0.45
                                          halogen HAP kg/hr by venting
                                          through a closed-vent system
                                          to a halogen reduction device.
2. Process at a new source with          Reduce overall emissions of HAP
 uncontrolled emissions from process      metals by >=97 percent by at a
 vents >=150 lb/yr of HAP metals.         new weight.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    17. Table 4 to subpart FFFF of part 63 is amended by revising entry
1 to read as follows:

 Table 4 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63.--Emission Limits for Storage Tanks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       For each . . .            For which . . .     Then you must . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Group 1 storage tank.....  a. The maximum true   i. Reduce total HAP
                               vapor pressure of     emissions by >=95
                               total HAP at the      percent by weight
                               storage temperature   or to < =20 ppmv of
                               of >=76.6             TOC or organic HAP
                               kilopascals.          and < =20 ppmv of
                                                     hydrogen halide and
                                                     halogen HAP by
                                                     venting emissions
                                                     through a closed
                                                     vent system to any
                                                     combination of
                                                     control devices
                                                     (excluding a
                                                     flare); or
                                                    ii. Reduce total
                                                     organic HAP
                                                     emissions by
                                                     venting emissions
                                                     through a closed
                                                     vent system to a
                                                     flare; or
                                                    iii. Reduce total
                                                     HAP emissions by
                                                     venting emissions
                                                     to a fuel gas
                                                     system or process
                                                     in accordance with
                                                     Sec.   63.984 and
                                                     the requirements
                                                     referenced therein.

                              b. The maximum true   i. Comply with the
                               vapor pressure of     requirements of
                               total HAP at the      subpart WW of this
                               storage temperature   part, except as
                               is < 76.6              specified in Sec.
                               kilopascals.          63.2470; or
                                                    ii. Reduce total HAP
                                                     emissions by >=95
                                                     percent at the
                                                     storage by weight
                                                     or to < =20 ppmv of
                                                     TOC or organic HAP
                                                     and < =20 ppmv of
                                                     hydrogen halide and
                                                     halogen HAP by
                                                     venting emissions
                                                     through a closed
                                                     vent system to any
                                                     combination of
                                                     control devices
                                                     (excluding a
                                                     flare); or
                                                    iii. Reduce total
                                                     organic HAP
                                                     emissions by
                                                     venting emissions
                                                     through a closed
                                                     vent system to a
                                                     flare; or
                                                    iv. Reduce total HAP
                                                     emissions by
                                                     venting emissions
                                                     to a fuel gas
                                                     system or process
                                                     in accordance with
                                                     Sec.   63.984 and
                                                     the requirements
                                                     referenced therein.

                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    18. Table 5 to subpart FFFF of part 63 is amended by revising entry
1 to read as follows:

 Table 5 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63.--Emission Limits and Work Practice
                      Standards for Transfer Racks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        For each . . .                       You must . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Group 1 transfer rack.....  a. Reduce emissions of total organic HAP
                                by >=98 percent by weight or to an
                                outlet concentration < =20 ppmv as
                                organic HAP or TOC by venting emissions
                                through a closed-vent system to any
                                combination of control devices (except a
                                flare); or
                               b. Reduce emissions of total organic HAP
                                by venting emissions through a closed-
                                vent system to a flare; or
                               c. Reduce emissions of total organic HAP
                                by venting emissions to a fuel gas
                                system or process in accordance with
                                Sec.   63.984 and the requirements
                                referenced therein; or
                               d. Use a vapor balancing system designed
                                and operated to collect organic HAP
                                vapors displaced from tank trucks and
                                railcars during loading and route the
                                collected HAP vapors to the storage tank
                                from which the liquid being loaded
                                originated or to another storage tank
                                connected by a common header.

                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    19. Table 6 to subpart FFFF of part 63 is revised to read as
follows:

  Table 6 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63.--Requirements for Equipment Leaks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        For all . . .                        You must . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Equipment that is in        a. Comply with the requirements of
 organic HAP service.           subpart UU of this part 63 and the
                                requirements referenced therein, except
                                as specified in Sec.   63.2480(b), or
                               b. Comply with the requirements of 40 CFR
                                part 65, subpart F and the requirements
                                referenced therein, except as specified
                                in Sec.   63.2480(c).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    20. Table 12 to subpart FFFF of part 63 is amended as follows:
    a. Removing the entries for Sec. Sec.  63.8(c)(4)(i)-(ii) and
63.10(e)(1)-(2);
    b. Adding new entries for Sec. Sec.  63.8(c)(4)(i), 63.8(c)(4)(ii),
63.10(e)(1), 63.10(e)(2)(i), and 63.10(e)(2)(ii); and
    c. Revising the entries for Sec. Sec.  63.8(c)(4), 63.8(c)(6),
63.8(c)(7)-(8), 63.8(d), 63.8(e), 63.9(g), 63.10(b)(2)(xiii), and
63.10(c)(1)-(6), (9)-(15).

     Table 12 to Subpart FFFF of Part 63.--Applicability of General
                       Provisions to Subpart FFFF
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Citation                   Subject             Explanation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.   63.8(c)(4)...........  CMS Requirements....  Only for CEMS.
                                                     Requirements for
                                                     CPMS are specified
                                                     in referenced
                                                     subparts G and SS
                                                     of part 63.
                                                     Requirements for
                                                     COMS do not apply
                                                     because subpart
                                                     FFFF does not
                                                     require COMS.
Sec.   63.8(c)(4)(i)........  COMS Measurement and  No; subpart FFFF
                               Recording Frequency.  does not require
                                                     COMS.
Sec.   63.8(c)(4)(ii).......  CEMS Measurement and  Yes.
                               Recording Frequency.

                              * * * * * * *
Sec.   63.8(c)(6)...........  CMS Requirements....  Only for CEMS;
                                                     requirements for
                                                     CPMS are specified
                                                     in referenced
                                                     subparts G and SS
                                                     of this part 63.
                                                     Requirements for
                                                     COMS do not apply
                                                     because subpart
                                                     FFFF does not
                                                     require COMS.
Sec.   63.8(c)(7)-(8).......  CMS Requirements....  Only for CEMS.
                                                     Requirements for
                                                     CPMS are specified
                                                     in referenced
                                                     subparts G and SS
                                                     of part 63.
                                                     Requirements for
                                                     COMS do not apply
                                                     because subpart
                                                     FFFF does not
                                                     require COMS.
Sec.   63.8(d)..............  CMS Quality Control.  Only for CEMS.
Sec.   63.8(e)..............  CMS Performance       Only for CEMS.
                               Evaluation.           Section
                                                     63.8(e)(5)(ii) does
                                                     not apply because
                                                     subpart FFFF does
                                                     not require COMS.

                              * * * * * * *
Sec.   63.9(g)..............  Additional            Only for CEMS.
                               Notifications When    Section 63.9(g)(2)
                               Using CMS.            does not apply
                                                     because subpart
                                                     FFFF does not
                                                     require COMS.

                              * * * * * * *
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(xiii)....  Records.............  Only for CEMS.

                              * * * * * * *
Sec.   63.10(c)(1)-(6), (9)-  Records.............  Only for CEMS.
 (15).                                               Recordkeeping
                                                     requirements for
                                                     CPMS are specified
                                                     in referenced
                                                     subparts G and SS
                                                     of this part 63.

                              * * * * * * *
Sec.   63.10(e)(1)..........  Additional CEMS       Yes.
                               Reports.
Sec.   63.10(e)(2)(i).......  Additional CMS        Only for CEMS.
                               Reports.
Sec.   63.10(e)(2)(ii)......  Additional COMS       No. Subpart FFFF
                               Reports.              does not require
                                                     COMS.

                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 05-23666 Filed 12-7-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: November 24, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 226)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 71538-71540]
[DOCID:fr24no10-8]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-1110; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-052-AD;
Amendment 39-16517; AD 2010-23-27]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A340-500 and A340-600
Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    An A340-642 operator reported [fault messages ``Main Fuel Pump
4'' and ``Eng 4 Stall/Surge''] * * * and finally the engine had an
auto shutdown [along] with [fault message ``Engine 4 Fail''] * * *.
* * * * *
    Simultaneous loss of at least two Main Pumps along with other
potential failures related to the in-service event may lead to a
dual engine loss.
* * * * *

    This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: This AD becomes effective December 9, 2010.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of December 9,
2010.
    We must receive comments on this AD by January 10, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1138; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2010-0013, dated January 26, 2010 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    An A340-642 operator reported a Main Fuel Pump 4 fault that
occurred during descent. Afterwards it was followed by a 2 times Eng
4 Stall/Surge Message and finally the engine had an auto shutdown
with Message Engine 4 Fail.
    Analysis of the A340-500/600 aircraft fuel-pump electrical-
circuit design has shown that when a main fuel pump becomes
unserviceable and the fuel pressure indication system indicates
abnormal High (HI) pressure, these unwanted conditions occur:

--There is no Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitor (ECAM) caution
or fault light of the unserviceable fuel pump.
--The crew cannot manually set the standby fuel pump to `ON' because
of the main pump pressure abnormal HI condition. Simultaneous loss
of at least two Main Pumps along with other potential failures
related to the in-service event may lead to a dual engine loss.
    This AD mandates the modification of the main and standby pump
wiring logic which will let the related standby fuel pump be set
`ON' irrespective of the status of the main fuel pump pressure
switch in each of the conditions that follow:

--After the main fuel pump becomes unserviceable;
--When the push-button switch of the related main fuel pump is set
to `OFF', even if the fuel pump pressure indicates abnormally HI.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Airbus has issued Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-28-5050,
including Appendix 1, dated October 8, 2009. The actions described in
this service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe

condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of
the same type design.
    There are no products of this type currently registered in the
United States. However, this rule is necessary to ensure that the
described unsafe condition is addressed if any of these products are
placed on the U.S. Register in the future.

Differences Between the AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the AD.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    Since there are currently no domestic operators of this product,
notice and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are
unnecessary.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-1110; Directorate
Identifier 2010-NM-052-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2010-23-27 Airbus: Amendment 39-16517. Docket No. FAA-2010-1110;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-052-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective December
9, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A340-541 and A340-642
airplanes, certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continued airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    An A340-642 operator reported [fault messages ``Main Fuel Pump
4'' and ``Eng 4 Stall/Surge''] * * * and finally the engine had an
auto shutdown [along] with [fault message ``Engine 4 Fail''] * * *.
* * * * *
    Simultaneous loss of at least two Main Pumps along with other
potential failures related to the in-service event may lead to a
dual engine loss.
* * * * *

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Actions

    (g) Within 13,500 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD, modify the equipment and the wiring connected to the main and
standby pumps in the left and right wing, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A340-28-5050, dated October 8, 2009.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District

Office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (i) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness
Directive 2010-0013, dated January 26, 2010; and Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A340-28-5050, dated October 8, 2009; for related
information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (j) You must use Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-28-5050,
including Appendix 1, dated October 8, 2009, to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS--Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.airbus.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 2, 2010.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-28591 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16827]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6882]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG12-44-000.
    Applicants: Diamond State Generation Partners, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Diamond State
Generation Partners, LLC of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status.
    Filed Date: 3/15/12.
    Accession Number: 20120315-5038.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/5/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2605-004.
    Applicants: Tyr Energy LLC.
    Description: Tyr Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Compliance Filing--Market-Based Rate Tariff Amendment to be effective
5/14/2012.
    Filed Date: 3/15/12.
    Accession Number: 20120315-5090.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/5/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-726-001.
    Applicants: Spring Valley Wind LLC.
    Description: Spring Valley Wind LLC submits tariff filing per
35.17(b): Amended Application for Market-Based Rate Authority to be
effective 2/28/2012.
    Filed Date: 3/15/12.
    Accession Number: 20120315-5089.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/5/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1131-000.
    Applicants: Parkview AMC Energy, LLC.
    Description: Parkview AMC Energy, LLC submits tariff filing per:
Supplemental Information Filing to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 3/15/12.
    Accession Number: 20120315-5040.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/5/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1269-000.
    Applicants: BlueRock Energy, Inc.
    Description: BlueRock Energy, Inc. submits tariff filing per 35.1:
Market-Based Rate Tariff Baseline to be effective 3/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 3/15/12.
    Accession Number: 20120315-5024.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/5/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1270-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: 03-15-12 Schedule 20 to be
effective 5/15/2012.
    Filed Date: 3/15/12.
    Accession Number: 20120315-5085.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/5/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
reliability filings:

    Docket Numbers: RR12-5-000.
    Applicants: North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
    Description: Petition of the North American Electric Reliability
Corporation for Approval of Amendments to Delegation Agreement with
SERC Reliability Corporation--Amendments to SERC's Bylaws and Regional
Standards Development Procedure.
    Filed Date: 3/15/12.
    Accession Number: 20120315-5056.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/5/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 15, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6882 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 20755]
[FR Doc No: 2021-08139]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-125, OMB Control No. 3235-0104]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
    Form 3

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved
collection[s] of information discussed below.
    Under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act'') (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.), every person who owns more
than ten percent of any class of equity security (other than an
exempted security) which is requested under Section 12 of the Exchange
Act, or who is a director or an officer of the issuer of such security
(collectively ``reporting persons'') are required to file statements
disclosing their ownership of the issuer's equity securities. Form 3
must be filed within ten days after the event by which the person
becomes a reporting person. Approximately 21,968 insiders file Form 3
annually and it takes approximately 0.50 hours to prepare for a total
of 10,984 annual burden hours (0.50 hours per response x 21,968
responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice
to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) David Bottom,
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o Cynthia Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by
sending an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: April 15, 2021.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-08139 Filed 4-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 52644]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20969]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP14-1202-000.
    Applicants: Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Tariff Waiver--ROFR
Posting to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 8/26/14.
    Accession Number: 20140826-5055.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/8/14.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered,
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 27, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-20969 Filed 9-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Exhibit 2: Agency Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Total Agency Hours per Labor Category Legal Manager Technical Clerical Consultant Total Labor Capital/ O& M # Of Total Total $ 77.87 $ 66.21 $ 49.44 $ 24.99 $ 66.21 Respondent Cost Startup Cost Respond. Hours Cost INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY / hr / hr / hr / hr / hr hr/ yr $/ yr $/ yr $/ yr or Activities hr/ yr $/ yr STANDARDS Nothing 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 $ 0 Total ( Standards) 0.0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 $ 0 COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS Compliance with alternative MACT standards Review operating record documenting compliance with all applicable CAA requirements and standards when not burning hazardous waste 0.0 0.5 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 $ 132 $ 0 $ 0 4.0 9.9 $ 521 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 4.0 2.0 $ 94 Subtotal 0.0 0.8 2.0 0.3 0.0 3.0 $ 155 $ 0 $ 1 11.9 $ 615 Extension of compliance with emission standards Review requests for extension of the compliance date 0.0 0.5 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 $ 231 $ 0 $ 0 15.8 71.1 $ 3,648 Review progress reports, if required by EPA 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 $ 83 $ 0 $ 0 7.9 11.9 $ 652 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 5 15.8 7.9 $ 439 Subtotal 0.0 1.3 5.0 0.3 0.0 6.5 $ 336 $ 0 $ 5 90.9 $ 4,739 Data in lieu for DRE testing Review data in lieu submission 0.0 3.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 $ 446 $ 0 $ 0 59.3 474.0 $ 26,415 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 59.3 29.6 $ 1,410 Subtotal 0.0 3.3 5.0 0.3 0.0 8.5 $ 469 $ 0 $ 1 503.6 $ 27,825 Hazardous waste residence time Review determination of hazardous waste residence time 0.0 0.3 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 $ 115 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 177.8 $ 9,119 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 79.0 39.5 $ 1,880 Subtotal 0.0 0.5 2.0 0.3 0.0 2.8 $ 138 $ 0 $ 1 217.3 $ 10,999 Changes in design, operation, or maintenance Review notifications of changes in design, operation, or maintenance 0.0 3.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 18.0 $ 940 $ 0 $ 0 39.5 711.0 $ 37,139 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 39.5 19.8 $ 940 Subtotal 0.0 3.3 15.0 0.3 0.0 18.5 $ 963 $ 0 $ 1 730.8 $ 38,079 Applicability of particulate matter and opacity standards during PM CEMS correlation tests Review of PM CEMS correlation test plans 0.0 0.3 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.3 $ 511 $ 0 $ 0 13.0 133.3 $ 6,642 Notify applicants of EPA' determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 13.0 6.5 $ 309 Subtotal 0.0 0.5 10.0 0.3 0.0 10.8 $ 534 $ 0 $ 1 139.8 $ 6,952 Alternative particulate matter standard for liquid fuel boilers with low feedrates of metals Page 1 of 9 Exhibit 2: Agency Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Total Agency Hours per Labor Category Legal Manager Technical Clerical Consultant Total Labor Capital/ O& M # Of Total Total $ 77.87 $ 66.21 $ 49.44 $ 24.99 $ 66.21 Respondent Cost Startup Cost Respond. Hours Cost INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY / hr / hr / hr / hr / hr hr/ yr $/ yr $/ yr $/ yr or Activities hr/ yr $/ yr Review petitions for alternative particulate matter standard for liquid boilers with low feedrates of metals 0.0 0.5 15.0 0.0 0.0 15.5 $ 775 7.9 122.5 $ 6,120 Notify applicants of EPA' determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 0 7.9 4.0 $ 180 Subtotal 0.0 0.8 15.0 0.3 0.0 16.0 $ 798 $ 0 $ 0 126.4 $ 6,300 Startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan Review startup, shutdown, and malfunction plans, notify applicant of results of review 0.0 0.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 $ 280 $ 0 $ 1 79.0 434.5 $ 22,223 Subtotal 0.0 0.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 $ 280 $ 0 $ 1 434.5 $ 22,223 Automatic waste feed cutoff Review excessive exceedance reports 0.0 0.3 5.0 0.1 0.0 5.4 $ 266 $ 0 $ 0 7.9 42.3 $ 2,103 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 7.9 4.0 $ 188 Subtotal 0.0 0.5 5.0 0.4 0.0 5.9 $ 289 $ 0 $ 1 46.2 $ 2,291 ESV openings Review ESV openings report 0.0 0.3 5.0 0.1 0.0 5.4 $ 266 $ 0 $ 0 18.7 100.0 $ 4,979 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 18.7 9.4 $ 445 Subtotal 0.0 0.5 5.0 0.4 0.0 5.9 $ 289 $ 0 $ 1 109.4 $ 5,424 Combustion system leaks Review requests for approval of alternative means of combustion system leak control 0.0 0.5 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 $ 132 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 197.5 $ 10,427 Notify applicants of EPA' determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 79.0 39.5 $ 1,880 Subtotal 0.0 0.8 2.0 0.3 0.0 3.0 $ 155 $ 0 $ 1 237.0 $ 12,307 Operator training and certification Review operator training and certification programs 0.0 0.3 15.0 0.0 0.0 15.3 $ 758 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 1204.8 $ 59,894 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 20 79.0 39.5 $ 3,381 Subtotal 0.0 0.5 15.0 0.3 0.0 15.8 $ 781 $ 0 $ 20 1244.3 $ 63,275 Operation and Maintenance Plan Review request to use alternative OPLs for ESP and ISWs 0.0 0.3 8.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 $ 412 $ 0 $ 0 14.0 115.5 $ 5,769 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 20 14.0 7.0 $ 599 Subtotal 0.0 0.5 8.0 0.3 0.0 8.8 $ 435 $ 0 $ 20 122.5 $ 6,368 Total ( Compliance and Standards) 110.7 $ 5,621 $ 0 $ 54 4014.3 $ 207,399 PERFORMANCE TESTING REQUIREMENTS Data in lieu of the initial comprehensive performance test Review requests to base initial compliance data in lieu of a Page 2 of 9 Exhibit 2: Agency Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Total Agency Hours per Labor Category Legal Manager Technical Clerical Consultant Total Labor Capital/ O& M # Of Total Total $ 77.87 $ 66.21 $ 49.44 $ 24.99 $ 66.21 Respondent Cost Startup Cost Respond. Hours Cost INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY / hr / hr / hr / hr / hr hr/ yr $/ yr $/ yr $/ yr or Activities hr/ yr $/ yr comprehensice performance test 0.0 2.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 22.0 $ 1,121 $ 0 $ 0 7.9 173.8 $ 8,858 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 7.9 4.0 $ 188 Subtotal 0.0 2.3 20.0 0.3 0.0 22.5 $ 1,144 $ 0 $ 1 177.8 $ 9,046 Notifcation of performance test and CMS performance evaluation and approval of test plan and CMS performance evaluation plan Review notifications of intention to conduct a performance test 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 $ 29 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 39.5 $ 2,284 Review notifications of delay in conducting a performance test 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 $ 29 $ 0 $ 0 7.9 4.0 $ 228 Review site specific comprehensive performance test plans 0.0 5.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 55.0 $ 2,803 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 4345.0 $ 221,440 Review site specific confirmatory performance test plans 0.0 2.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 $ 627 $ 0 $ 0 5.9 70.8 $ 3,698 Request additional relevant information 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 20 15.7 7.8 $ 671 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 20 79.0 39.5 $ 3,381 Subtotal 0.0 8.0 60.5 0.5 0.0 69.0 $ 3,533 $ 0 $ 40 4506.6 $ 231,703 Time extension for subsequent performance tests Review requests for an extension for conducting a performance test ( other than the initial comprehensive performance test) 0.0 4.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 $ 1,056 $ 0 $ 0 15.8 316.0 $ 16,683 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 15.8 7.9 $ 376 Subtotal 0.0 4.3 16.0 0.3 0.0 20.5 $ 1,079 $ 0 $ 1 323.9 $ 17,059 Notification of compliance Review notifications of compliance 0.0 3.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 43.0 $ 2,176 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 3397.0 $ 171,922 Review requests for a time extension for Notification of Compliance 0.0 0.3 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 $ 214 $ 0 $ 0 19.8 83.9 $ 4,233 Notify applicants of the EPA' s determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 0 19.8 9.9 $ 450 Subtotal 0.0 3.5 44.0 0.3 0.0 47.8 $ 2,413 $ 0 $ 0 3490.8 $ 176,605 Waiver of performance tests Review requests to waive a performance test 0.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 $ 264 $ 0 $ 0 15.8 79.0 $ 4,171 Notify applicants of EPA' s determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 0 15.8 7.9 $ 360 Subtotal 0.0 1.3 4.0 0.3 0.0 5.5 $ 287 $ 0 $ 0 86.9 $ 4,531 Total ( Performance Testing) 165.3 $ 8,456 $ 0 $ 42 8585.9 $ 438,943 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Analysis of feedstream Request feedstream analysis plan 0.0 0.8 10.0 0.3 0.0 11.0 $ 550 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Page 3 of 9 Exhibit 2: Agency Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Total Agency Hours per Labor Category Legal Manager Technical Clerical Consultant Total Labor Capital/ O& M # Of Total Total $ 77.87 $ 66.21 $ 49.44 $ 24.99 $ 66.21 Respondent Cost Startup Cost Respond. Hours Cost INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY / hr / hr / hr / hr / hr hr/ yr $/ yr $/ yr $/ yr or Activities hr/ yr $/ yr Subtotal 0.0 0.8 10.0 0.3 0.0 11.0 $ 550 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Alternative compliance, monitoring requirements for standards other than those monitored with a CEMS Review requests for approval of alternative monitoring methods, except for standards that must be monitored with a CEMS 0.0 0.5 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.5 $ 528 $ 0 $ 0 7.9 83.0 $ 4,167 Review requests for approval of a waiver of an operating parameter limit 0.0 1.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 $ 561 $ 0 $ 0 7.9 86.9 $ 4,429 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval of alternative monitoring requirements 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 7.9 4.0 $ 188 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval of a waiver of an operating parameter limit 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 7.9 4.0 $ 188 Subtotal 0.0 2.0 20.0 0.5 0.0 22.5 $ 1,134 $ 0 $ 2 177.8 $ 8,972 DRE Review DRE operating parameter limits 0.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 $ 264 $ 0 $ 0 39.0 195.0 $ 10,295 Subtotal 0.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 $ 264 $ 0 $ 0 195.0 $ 10,295 Dioxins and furans Review dioxin and furan operating parameter limits 0.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 $ 264 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 395.0 $ 20,853 Review requests for approval to substitute a different brand or type of carbon 0.0 0.5 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 $ 132 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Review requesrs for approval to substitute a different brand or type of inhibitor 0.0 0.5 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 $ 132 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval to substitute a different brand or type of carbon 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.8 $ 33 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval to substitute a different brand or type of inhibitor 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.8 $ 33 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.0 3.0 8.0 0.0 0.5 11.5 $ 594 $ 0 $ 2 395.0 $ 20,853 Mercury Review mercury operating parameter limits 0.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 $ 264 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 395.0 $ 20,853 Review requests to extrapolate mercury feedrate limits 0.0 0.3 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 $ 115 $ 0 $ 0 7.9 17.8 $ 912 Review requesrs for approval to use a CEMS in lieu of operating parameter limtis 0.0 0.3 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 $ 115 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination to extrapolate mercury feedrate limits 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 7.9 4.0 $ 188 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval to use a CEMS 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.0 2.0 8.0 0.5 0.0 10.5 $ 540 $ 0 $ 2 416.7 $ 21,953 Particulate matter Page 4 of 9 Exhibit 2: Agency Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Total Agency Hours per Labor Category Legal Manager Technical Clerical Consultant Total Labor Capital/ O& M # Of Total Total $ 77.87 $ 66.21 $ 49.44 $ 24.99 $ 66.21 Respondent Cost Startup Cost Respond. Hours Cost INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY / hr / hr / hr / hr / hr hr/ yr $/ yr $/ yr $/ yr or Activities hr/ yr $/ yr Review particulate matter operating parameter limits 0.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 $ 264 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 395.0 $ 20,853 Subtotal 0.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 $ 264 $ 0 $ 0 395.0 $ 20,853 Semivolatile and low semivolatile metals Review semivolatile metal and low volatile metal operating parameter limit 0.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 $ 264 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 395.0 $ 20,853 Review requests to extrapolate semivolatile metal and low volatile metal feedrate limits 0.0 0.3 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 $ 115 $ 0 $ 0 7.9 17.8 $ 912 Review requests for approval to use a CEMS in lieu of operating parameter limtis 0.0 0.3 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 $ 115 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination to extrapolate SVM and LVM feedrates 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 7.9 4.0 $ 188 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval to use a CEMS 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.0 2.0 8.0 0.5 0.0 10.5 $ 540 $ 0 $ 2 416.7 $ 21,953 Total chlorine ( hydrogen chloride and chlorine gas)

Review total chlorine operating parameter limits 0.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 $ 264 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 395.0 $ 20,853 Review requests for approval to substitute a different brand or type of sorbent 0.0 0.3 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 $ 115 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Review requests for approval to use a CEMS in lieu of operating parameter limtis 0.0 0.3 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 $ 115 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval to substitute a different brand or type of sorbent 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination for approval to use a CEMS 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.0 2.0 8.0 0.5 0.0 10.5 $ 540 $ 0 $ 2 395.0 $ 20,853 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Quality control program Review CMS quality control program 0.0 0.3 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.3 $ 511 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 809.8 $ 40,365 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 20 $ 22 79.0 39.5 $ 5,119 Subtotal 0.0 0.5 10.0 0.3 0.0 10.8 $ 534 $ 20 $ 22 849.3 $ 45,484 Notification of performance evaluation Review notifications of CMS performance evaluation 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.4 $ 15 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 27.7 $ 1,174 Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.4 $ 15 $ 0 $ 0 27.7 $ 1,174 Additional notification requirements for sources with continuous monitoring systems Review additional notification requirements for source with CMS 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 $ 66 $ 0 $ 0 7.9 9.9 $ 521 Subtotal 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 $ 66 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 $ 521 Page 5 of 9 Exhibit 2: Agency Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Total Agency Hours per Labor Category Legal Manager Technical Clerical Consultant Total Labor Capital/ O& M # Of Total Total $ 77.87 $ 66.21 $ 49.44 $ 24.99 $ 66.21 Respondent Cost Startup Cost Respond. Hours Cost INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY / hr / hr / hr / hr / hr hr/ yr $/ yr $/ yr $/ yr or Activities hr/ yr $/ yr Submission of site specific performance evaluation test plan Review site specific performance evaluation test plans 0.0 1.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 $ 561 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 869.0 $ 44,288 Request additional relavant information 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 10 59.3 29.6 $ 1,943 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 20 79.0 39.5 $ 3,381 Subtotal 0.0 1.5 10.0 0.5 0.0 12.0 $ 606 $ 0 $ 30 938.1 $ 49,613 Reporting results of continuous monitoring system performance evaluations Review written reports of the results of the CMS performance evaluation 0.0 0.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 $ 280 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 434.5 $ 22,144 Subtotal 0.0 0.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 $ 280 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 $ 22,144 Total ( Monitoring and Performance Evaluation) 116.4 $ 5,929 $ 20 $ 62 4206.2 $ 244,670 MISCELLANEOUS NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Notice of Intent to Comply Review draft and final NIC 0.0 2.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 32.0 $ 1,616 $ 0 $ 20 79.0 2528.0 $ 129,214 Attend public meeting 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 $ 494 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 790.0 $ 39,058 Subtotal 0.0 2.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 42.0 $ 2,110 $ 0 $ 20 3318.0 $ 168,271 Initial notification Review intial notifications 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 $ 66 $ 0 $ 0 9.0 11.3 $ 594 Review applications of approval of construction 0.0 0.3 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.3 $ 511 $ 0 $ 0 4.0 40.5 $ 2,018 Review applications of approval of reconstruction, as applicable 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 $ 66 $ 0 $ 0 4.0 4.9 $ 261 Request additional relevant information 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 4.0 2.0 $ 94 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 7.9 4.0 $ 188 Subtotal 0.0 1.3 12.0 0.5 0.0 13.8 $ 689 $ 0 $ 2 62.6 $ 3,155 Adjustment to time periods or postmark deadlines for submittal and review of equiped communications Review requests for an adjustment to time periods or postmark deadlines for submittal and review of required informaiton 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 $ 83 $ 0 $ 0 19.8 29.6 $ 1,630 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 19.8 9.9 $ 470 Subtotal 0.0 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.0 2.0 $ 105 $ 0 $ 1 39.5 $ 2,100 Change in information already provided Review notifications of change( s) in the information already provided 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 $ 66 $ 0 $ 0 19.8 24.7 $ 1,303 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 19.8 9.9 $ 470 Page 6 of 9 Exhibit 2: Agency Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Total Agency Hours per Labor Category Legal Manager Technical Clerical Consultant Total Labor Capital/ O& M # Of Total Total $ 77.87 $ 66.21 $ 49.44 $ 24.99 $ 66.21 Respondent Cost Startup Cost Respond. Hours Cost INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY / hr / hr / hr / hr / hr hr/ yr $/ yr $/ yr $/ yr or Activities hr/ yr $/ yr Subtotal 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.3 0.0 1.8 $ 89 $ 0 $ 1 34.6 $ 1,773 Request to reduce frequency of excess emissions an continuous monitoring system performance results Review requests to reduce the frequency of excess emissions and CMS performance reports 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 $ 83 $ 0 $ 0 7.9 11.9 $ 652 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 7.9 4.0 $ 188 Subtotal 0.0 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.0 2.0 $ 105 $ 0 $ 1 15.8 $ 840 Waiver of record keeping and reporting requirements Review waivers of recordkeeping or reporting 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 $ 83 $ 0 $ 0 4.0 5.9 $ 326 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 4.0 2.0 $ 94 Subtotal 0.0 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.0 2.0 $ 105 $ 0 $ 1 7.9 $ 420 Data compression Review requests for approval to use date compression technigues to record data on a less frequent basis 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 $ 83 $ 0 $ 0 19.8 29.6 $ 1,630 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 19.8 9.9 $ 470 Subtotal 0.0 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.0 2.0 $ 105 $ 0 $ 1 39.5 $ 2,100 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Startup shutdown and malfunction reports Review startup, shutdown, and malfunction report, as applicable 0.0 0.3 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 $ 264 $ 0 $ 0 19.8 103.7 $ 5,209 Review immediate startup, shutdown, and malfunction report, as applicable 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 $ 66 $ 0 $ 0 7.9 9.9 $ 521 Subtotal 0.0 0.5 6.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 $ 330 $ 0 $ 0 113.6 $ 5,730 Excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report Review excess emissions and monitoring system performance reports and summary reports 0.0 0.3 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 $ 264 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 414.8 $ 20,836 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 79.0 39.5 $ 1,880 Subtotal 0.0 0.5 5.0 0.3 0.0 5.8 $ 287 $ 0 $ 1 454.3 $ 22,717 RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS General recordkeeping requirements Inspect and review the files of all information ( including all reports and notifications), as necessary 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 15.0 $ 375 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 1185.0 $ 29,616 Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 15.0 $ 375 $ 0 $ 0 1185.0 $ 29,616 EXTENSION OF THE COMPLIANCE DATE FOR WASTE MINIMIZATION OR POLLUTION PREVENTION Extension of the compliance date to install pollution prevention waste minimization controls Review requests for an extension of compliance date 0.0 1.0 4.0 0.3 0.0 5.3 $ 270 $ 0 $ 1 7.9 41.5 $ 2,143 Subtotal 0.0 1.0 4.0 0.3 0.0 5.3 $ 270 $ 0 $ 1 41.5 $ 2,143 Page 7 of 9 Exhibit 2: Agency Burden and Cost Hours and Costs Per Respondent or Activity Total Hours and Costs Total Agency Hours per Labor Category Legal Manager Technical Clerical Consultant Total Labor Capital/ O& M # Of Total Total $ 77.87 $ 66.21 $ 49.44 $ 24.99 $ 66.21 Respondent Cost Startup Cost Respond. Hours Cost INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY / hr / hr / hr / hr / hr hr/ yr $/ yr $/ yr $/ yr or Activities hr/ yr $/ yr QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES FOR CEMS Performance Evaluation Review data collected from CEMS performance evaluation 0.0 0.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 $ 280 $ 0 $ 0 79.0 434.5 $ 22,144 Notify applicants of EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 79.0 39.5 $ 1,880 Subtotal 0.0 0.8 5.0 0.3 0.0 6.0 $ 303 $ 0 $ 1 474.0 $ 24,024 Use of alternative CEMS spans Review requests for approval to use alternative CEMS spans and ranges 0.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 $ 264 $ 0 $ 0 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Notify applicants of the EPA's determination 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 $ 23 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 0.0 $ 0 Subtotal 0.0 1.3 4.0 0.3 0.0 5.5 $ 287 $ 0 $ 1 0.0 $ 0 MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS Alternative Risk Based Chlorine Standards Review request for use of alternative risk based chlorine standards 0.0 3.0 20.0 2.0 0.0 25.0 $ 1,237 $ 0 $ 1 18.9 472.9 $ 23,427 Subtotal 0.0 3.0 20.0 2.0 0.0 25.0 $ 1,237 $ 0 $ 1 472.9 23426.6 HCl Production Furnace Storage and Transfer Activities Review LDAR plan and compliance with control efficiency req's 0.0 1.0 10.0 1.0 0.0 12.0 $ 586 $ 0 $ 1 0.3 4.0 $ 196 Subtotal 0.0 1.0 10.0 1.0 0.0 12.0 $ 586 $ 0 $ 1 4.0 $ 196 Total ( Notification, Recordkeeping, Pollution Prevention, Quality Assurance for CEMS) 146.5 $ 6,983 $ 0 $ 33 6,263.1 $ 286,512 GRAND TOTAL 538.8 $ 26,989 $ 20 $ 191 23,069.6 $ 1,177,523 Page 8 of 9