[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 82 (Monday, April 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25069-25070]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09989]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ Project No. 516-474]

South Carolina Electric & Gas Company; Notice of Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Non-project use of project lands and
waters.
    b. Project No: 516-474.
    c. Date Filed: November 29, 2012 and March 19, 2013.
    d. Applicant: South Carolina Electric & Gas Company.
    e. Name of Project: Saluda Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The project is located on the Saluda River in
Lexington, Newberry, Richland, and Saluda counties, South Carolina. The
proposed action would occur on Lake Murray in Lexington County, South
Carolina.
    g. Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Tommy Boozer, Manager, Lake Management
Programs, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, 6248 Bush River Road,
Columbia, SC 29212, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Mr. Lorance Yates at<PHONE_NUMBER> or email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments and/or motions: May 20, 2013.
    All documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Please include the project number (P-516-474) on any comments, motions,
or recommendations filed.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person whose name appears on the official service
list for the project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or
documents with the Commission relating to the merits of an issue that
may affect the responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they
must also serve a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Application: South Carolina Electric and Gas
Company proposes to permit Lake Murray Docks, Inc./Windward Point Yacht
Club to use project waters to expand an existing boat dock facility
through the addition of an 8-slip floating dock to accommodate a
maximum of 12 additional boats. The proposed new structures would be
for the private use of members of the Windward Point Yacht Club. The
new work would consist of attaching the proposed addition to the
existing floating facility.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed on
the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits

(P-516) in the docket number field to access the document. You may also
register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to
be notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is also
available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item (h)
above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Documents: Any filing must (1) Bear in all
capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO
INTERVENE'' as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the name of the
applicant and the project number of the application to which the filing
responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the
person commenting, protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise comply
with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, motions to intervene, or protests must set forth their
evidentiary basis. Any filing made by an intervenor must be accompanied
by proof of service on all persons listed in the service list prepared
by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR
385.2010.

    Dated: April 19, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-09989 Filed 4-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18763-18765]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08959]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0291; Airspace Docket No. 18-AGL-10]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Ionia, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend the Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at Ionia County Airport, Ionia,
MI. The FAA is proposing this action as a result of an airspace review
due to the decommissioning of the Lansing VHF omnidirectional range
(VOR) navigation aid as part of the VOR Minimum Operational Network
(MON) Program. The geographic coordinates of the airport would also be
updated to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 14, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone
(202) 366-9826, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2018-0291; Airspace Docket No. 18-AGL-10, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in

person in the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11B at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface at Ionia County Airport, Ionia, MI, to support instrument
flight rule operations.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2018-0291/
Airspace Docket No. 18-AGL-10.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Federal Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and effective
September 15, 2017. FAA Order 7400.11B is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11B lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by amending the Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface to within a 6.5-mile radius
(decreased from a 7.4-mile radius) at Ionia County Airport, Ionia, MI.
The geographic coordinates of the airport would also be updated to
coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database.
    This action is necessary due to an airspace review caused by the
decommissioning of the Lansing VOR as part of the VOR MON Program.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.11B, dated August 3, 2017, and effective September 15,
2017, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11B,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and
effective September 15, 2017, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth

* * * * *

AGL MI E5 Ionia, MI [Amended]

Ionia County Airport, MI
    (Lat. 42[deg]56'17'' N, long. 85[deg]03'38'' W)
    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of the Ionia County Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 23, 2018.
Christopher L. Southerland,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2018-08959 Filed 4-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: November 19, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 222)]
[Notices]
[Page 60006-60008]
[DOCID:fr19no09-81]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60991; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2009-092]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
To Eliminate Rules Related to Nasdaq's PORTAL Market

November 12, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 26, 2009, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by Nasdaq. Nasdaq has designated the proposed
rule change as constituting a non-controversial rule change under Rule
19b-4(f)(6) under the Act,\3\ which renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    Nasdaq proposes to eliminate rules related to Nasdaq's PORTAL
Market. The text of the proposed rule change is below. The text of the
proposed rule change is attached as Exhibit 5 and [sic] is available at
http://www.cchwallstreet.com/nasdaq.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Changes are marked to the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC found at http://nasdaqomx.cchwallstreet.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Nasdaq proposes to eliminate rules related to its PORTAL Market.

Background

    The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (``NASD'')
created the PORTAL Market in 1990,\5\ simultaneously with the SEC's
adoption of Rule 144A,\6\ to be a new trading system for the purpose of
quoting, trading, and reporting trades in securities deemed eligible
for resale by Qualified Institutional Buyers under Rule 144A. Rule 144A
provides an exemption from registration under Section 5 of the
Securities Act \7\ for resales of privately placed securities to
investors that meet the eligibility requirements of being a qualified
institutional buyer (``QIB'') under Rule 144A(a)(1),\8\ i.e.,
institutional investors that in the aggregate own or invest on a
discretionary basis at least $100 million in securities and broker/
dealers that in the aggregate own or invest on a discretionary basis at
least $10 million in securities. The PORTAL Market did

not develop as anticipated.\9\ For many years, the sole function of the
NASD related to the PORTAL market was to review whether an issue of
privately placed securities met the eligibility requirements of Rule
144A, thereby qualifying the securities for book-entry services offered
by the Depository Trust Company (``DTC'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 27956 (Apr. 27, 1990);
55 FR 18781 (May 4, 1990) (the ``original PORTAL rule filing'').
    \6\ Securities Act Release No. 6862 (April 23, 1990); 55 FR
17933 (April 30, 1990).
    \7\ 17 U.S.C. 77e.
    \8\ 17 CFR 230.144A(a)(1).
    \9\ For more information related to the background of The PORTAL
Market, see Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55669 (April 25,
2007); 72 FR 23874 (May 1, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The staff of Nasdaq has historically had responsibility for review
of PORTAL applications to determine the eligibility of securities and,
originally, PORTAL participants (including broker/dealers and
investors). Upon the separation of Nasdaq from the NASD and the
approval of Nasdaq as a registered national securities exchange under
Section 6 of the Act, the review functions for PORTAL market
eligibility were retained by Nasdaq and the PORTAL Market Rules in the
NASD Rule 5300 Series became the Nasdaq Rule 6500 Series.\10\ The NASD
continued, however, to regulate trading [sic] reporting for PORTAL-
designated securities. On July 31, 2007, the SEC approved amendments to
the PORTAL rules that reestablished a trading system for the purpose of
quoting and trading securities eligible for resale by qualified
institutional buyers under SEC Rule 144A.\11\ During the period
following the reestablishment of the Nasdaq PORTAL Market, Nasdaq
reexamined the operational and ownership structure of PORTAL with a
view to adopting changes that reflected the preferences of market
participants and enhanced the operation of the system. As a result of
this review, Nasdaq filed with the Commission rules that terminated the
operation of the Nasdaq PORTAL Market for trading PORTAL equity
securities, while allowing Nasdaq to continue to review and designate
both restricted debt and equity securities as PORTAL-eligible
securities in its SRO capacity. Nasdaq also indicated its intention to
enter into agreements with certain of its members or their affiliates
(the ``Firms'') to create, and take a minority interest in, the PORTAL
Alliance, a Delaware limited liability company principally formed to
operate a private open-access over-the-counter platform to facilitate
transactions in 144A restricted securities.\12\ Nasdaq has entered into
such agreements and will be providing technological and operational
support, in a non-SRO capacity, to that over-the-counter platform.
Recently, DTC eliminated its book-entry eligibility requirement that
certain Rule 144A securities be included in an SRO Rule 144A System,
like PORTAL. As such, market participants no longer need to seek PORTAL
designation to obtain DTC book-entry.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53128 (Jan. 13, 2006);
71 FR 3550 (Jan. 23, 2006).
    \11\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56172 (July 31, 2007);
72 FR 44196 (SR-NASDAQ-2006-065). At the time of approval, Nasdaq
indicated that it would first operate a system for trading PORTAL
equity, and thereafter would enable the system to trade PORTAL debt
securities. While the PORTAL equity functionality was made available
on August 15, 2007, Nasdaq did not, and has not, implemented any
trading functionality for PORTAL debt securities.
    \12\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58638 (September 24,
2008); 73 FR 57188 (October 1, 2008).
    \13\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59384 (February 11,
2009); 74 FR 7941 (February 20, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Proposal

    Based on the foregoing, Nasdaq has determined to terminate its
PORTAL security designation processes, as well as remove rules related
to the PORTAL Market from its rulebook.\14\ Nasdaq notes in making this
proposal that the vast majority of PORTAL Market rules describe a
system for the trading of PORTAL debt securities, a system that is not
in operation. Further, Nasdaq's PORTAL security designation rules are
no longer necessary as a result of DTC's elimination of the SRO Rule
144A System requirement.\15\ Finally, Nasdaq specifically notes that
nothing in this proposal is intended to impact securities previously
designated as PORTAL securities or alter any existing regulatory
obligation applicable to such securities, including, but not limited
to, any trade reporting obligation imposed by any self-regulatory
organization.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Nasdaq will continue to impose fees for The PORTAL
Reference Database. See NASDAQ Rule 7050.
    \15\ Nasdaq is no longer accepting new applications for debt or
equity securities seeking PORTAL designation.
    \16\ For example, FINRA Rule 6630.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\17\ in general, and with
Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,\18\ in particular, in that the proposal is
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. In
particular, Nasdaq's current PORTAL operations are limited,\19\ and its
security designation processes are no longer need to [sic] for issuers
to obtain DTC book-entry services. As such, elimination of the PORTAL
rules will provide clarity regarding the status of the PORTAL Market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \19\ The Commission understands that Nasdaq no longer performs
any functions related to PORTAL.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, as amended.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) \20\ of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires that a self-regulatory organization submit to the
Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of
the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission notes that the Exchange has satisfied the
five-day pre-filing notice requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.

Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2009-092 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2009-092. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official
business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of Nasdaq. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2009-092 and should be submitted on or before
December 10, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-27747 Filed 11-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 1, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 52085]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21338]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-10000-61-Region 8]

Settlement Agreement for Past Costs: State Painting Site, West
Valley City, Utah

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed agreement; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as
amended (''CERCLA''), notice is hereby given of the proposed settlement
under CERCLA, between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(``EPA''), the Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District (JVWCD), and
the Guarantee Company of North America (GCNA) (collectively, ``Settling
Parties'') to settle liabilities at the State Painting Site in West
Valley City, Utah.
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to the
agreement. The Agency will consider all comments received and may
modify or withdraw its consent to the agreement if comments received
disclose facts or considerations that indicate that the agreement is
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 31, 2019.

ADDRESSES: The proposed agreement and additional background information
relating to the agreement, as well as the Agency's response to any
comments are or will be available for public inspection at the EPA
Superfund Record Center, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado, by
appointment.
    Comments and requests for a copy of the proposed agreement should
be addressed to Julie Nicholson, Enforcement Specialist, Superfund and
Emergency Management Division, Environmental Protection Agency--Region
8, Mail Code 8SEM PAC, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202,
(303) 312-6343 and should reference the State Painting Site.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amelia Piggott, Senior Assistant
Regional Counsel, Office of Regional Counsel, Environmental Protection
Agency--Region 8, Mail Code 80RC LEC, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed Settlement Agreement requires
the Settling Parties to reimburse the EPA for past response costs. The
Settling Parties will pay ($257,179.00) within 30 days after the
Effective Date of the Proposed Agreement to the EPA. The Settling
Parties consent to and will not contest the authority of the United
States to enter into the Agreement or to implement or enforce its
terms. The Settling Parties recognize that the Agreement has been
negotiated in good faith and that the Agreement is entered into without
the admission or adjudication of any issue of fact or law.

    Dated: September 16, 2019.
Betsy Smidinger,
Division Director, Superfund and Emergency Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII.
[FR Doc. 2019-21338 Filed 9-30-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


From:
SINGLETON, KRIS E<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Wednesday, December 23, 2020 4:05 PM
To:
Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>BATTEN, KATIE M<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:
Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
RE: SunCoke's review - target date

Hello! Please see below for information requested. More to come....

Kris

<< Enclosure 2 Report Appendix G-1.pdf >>

From: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 12:13 PM
To: SINGLETON, KRIS E<EMAIL_ADDRESS>BATTEN, KATIE M<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: Re: SunCoke's review - target date

I forgot to mention that we are looking for all industry comments to be returned to EPA by 12/24 so we can work on the revisions between holiday breaks (when its quiet around EPA).

The items we need from SunCoke are listed below:

Whole Industry EF and ICR Data:
 Control efficiency from the pushing multiclone; We have not tested the efficiency of the multiclones, however, from our permit application for Middletown, the estimated particulate control efficiency is 98% (based on AP-42 factors).
 How to calculate lb/ton coal charged for charging units; Our ICR stack test report already calculated emission factors on a lb/ton of coal charged. See attached portion of the ICR test report Appendix G (PCM test results start on page 87).
 Confirm lb/ton coke produced is okay for pushing units.  Yes, lb/ton coke produced is appropriate for the pushing units.

Will send the following separately -
·  Modeling Shell:
 Review and respond to EPA's responses.
Other Emissions Files:
 Review and respond.
Thanks!

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

Pronouns - She/Her/Hers
Salutation - Dr./Ms.

From: SINGLETON, KRIS E<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 9:02 AM
To: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>BATTEN, KATIE M<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: RE: EPA responses to SunCoke's review of coke modeling file shell

Thanks Donna Lee. We will let you know if we have any follow-up comments.

Hope you have a nice holiday as well!

Kris

From: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 5:10 PM
To: BATTEN, KATIE M<EMAIL_ADDRESS>SINGLETON, KRIS E<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: EPA responses to SunCoke's review of coke modeling file shell

 Hello Kris and Katie,

Thank you again for your review of the coke modeling file shell. Please see attached for EPA Responses to SunCoke's review of the coke modeling file shell. CokeOven_CategoryNonCategory_RTR_ModFile_20201015-Suncoke_comments_EPA-responses-11-23-20.xlsx.  Column F in this file has the EPA responses. Please provide any follow-up industry responses in Column E and also let us know if we have missed anything that already has been revised.

Color Key:
EPA concurs and will update
EPA has followup questions/does not concur

We noticed that SunCoke made revisions/comments to the model file shell in the following two main categories:
-Changing pushing&charging units from mobile line sources to point sources.
-Combining pushing&charging units that serve multiple batteries.

For EP-9 HNR Pushing (CD) line source units, the release point width will be the width of the stack. For fugitive pushing emissions, the source width will be the default width of 0.9 m (to represent edge of the battery where the escaping emissions would come from). For EP-8 HNR Charging (CD) line source units, the width will be the physical battery width.

This is the same protocol used for all mobile units and pushing fugitives in the by-product industry.

We hope you both have a good holiday, as best as possible under these unique circumstances.

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER> Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated." - anon.
Pronouns - She/Her/Hers
Salutation - Dr./Ms.