[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 58 (Wednesday, March 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 16800]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06616]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0731]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office
of Management and Budget Approval; Eligibility Determination for Donors
of Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
collection of information entitled ``Eligibility Determination for
Donors of Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based
Products'' has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville,
MD 20850<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 28, 2014, the Agency submitted a
proposed collection of information entitled ``Eligibility Determination
for Donors of Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based
Products'' to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information
collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0543. The approval
expires on March 31, 2017. A copy of the supporting statement for this
information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: March 20, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-06616 Filed 3-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 30935]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13138]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2015-0208]

Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks, Berkeley Marina, San
Francisco Bay, Berkeley, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone for the Berkeley
Marina Fourth of July Fireworks display in the Captain of the Port, San
Francisco area of responsibility during the dates and times noted
below. This action is necessary to protect life and property of the
maritime public from the hazards associated with the fireworks display.
During the enforcement period, unauthorized persons or vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring in the
safety zone, unless authorized by the Patrol Commander (PATCOM).

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.1191, Table 1, Item number 8 will
be enforced from 9:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice,
call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade Joshua Dykman, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector San Francisco; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce a 1,000 foot
safety zone around the Berkeley Pier in approximate position
37[deg]51'40'' N., 122[deg]19'19'' W. (NAD 83) from 9:30 p.m. until 10
p.m. on July 4, 2015. Upon the commencement of the 30 minute fireworks
display, scheduled to begin at 9:30 p.m. on July 4, 2015, the safety
zone will encompass the navigable waters around and under the Berkeley
Pier within a radius 1,000 feet in approximate position 37[deg]51'40''
N., 122[deg]19'19'' W. (NAD83) for the Fourth of July Fireworks,
Berkeley Marina in 33 CFR 165.1191, Table 1, Item number 8. At the
conclusion of the fireworks display the safety zone shall terminate.
This safety zone will be in effect from 9:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4,
2015.
    Under the provisions of 33 CFR 165.1191, unauthorized persons or
vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring in the safety zone during all applicable effective dates and
times, unless authorized to do so by the PATCOM. Additionally, each
person who receives notice of a lawful order or direction issued by an
official patrol vessel shall obey the order or direction. The PATCOM is
empowered to forbid entry into and control the regulated area. The
PATCOM shall be designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector San
Francisco. The PATCOM may, upon request, allow the transit of
commercial vessels through regulated areas when it is safe to do so.
    This notice is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.1191 and 5
U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the
Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with extensive advance
notification of the safety zone and its enforcement period via the
Local Notice to Mariners.
    If the Captain of the Port determines that the regulated area need
not be enforced for the full duration stated in this notice, a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners may be used to grant general permission to
enter the regulated area.

    Dated: April 7, 2015.
Gregory G. Stump,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2015-13138 Filed 5-29-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 175 (Friday, September 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62497-62498]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21745]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 4285-046]

The City of Logan, Utah; Notice of Availability of Environmental
Assessment

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969,
as amended, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations
(18 CFR part 380), Commission staff has reviewed the application for
non-capacity amendment of license, filed May 8, 2015, to replace or
rehabilitate several portions of the Third Dam facilities that are part
of the Logan No. 2 Project, which is located on the Logan River, near
the City of Logan, in Cache County, Utah.
    The project licensee, the City of Logan (City), is proposing to:
(1) Replace the spillway crest gates with Obermeyer weirs; (2) replace
spillway abutment walls; (3) armor the abutments of the dam, which may
consist of a combination of riprap and/or roller compacted concrete;
(4) replace the penstock isolation gate (radial gate) with an Obermeyer
weir gate; (5) replace the trash rack at the intake structure; (6)
replace the low level sluice gatehouse; (7) rehabilitate the upstream
face of dam; (8) dredge about 100,000 cubic yards of sediment from the
reservoir; (9) refurbish the electrical generating equipment, which
includes replacing the existing runners, wicket gates, and associated
parts that are damaged; (10) recoat the interior and exterior of the
steel portion of the penstock to reduce corrosion potential; and (11)
replace the roof and repair the walls of the existing surge tank.
    An environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared as part of
staff's review of the proposal. In the EA, Commission staff analyzed
the probable environmental effects of the planned work and concluded
that approval of the work, with appropriate environmental measures,
would not constitute a major federal action

significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    The EA is available for review and reproduction at the Commission's
Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A,
Washington, DC 20426. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's Web
site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the
docket number (P-4285) in the docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-866-208-3372, or for TTY,
(202) 502-8659.
    All comments on the EA and supplement must be filed by October 3,
2016, and should reference Project No. 4285-046. The Commission
strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file comments using the
Commission's efiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000
characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end of your comments. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support. In lieu of electronic
filing, please send a paper copy to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426.
    For further information, contact Rebecca Martin at<PHONE_NUMBER>
or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: September 2, 2016.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-21745 Filed 9-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: November 2, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 212)]
[Notices]
[Page 62250-62251]
[DOCID:fr02no07-58]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2007-0028]

Navigation Safety Advisory Council; Meeting

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Navigation Safety Advisory Council (NAVSAC) will meet to
discuss various issues relating to the safety of navigation. The
meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: NAVSAC will meet on Tuesday, December 04, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4
p.m.; Wednesday, December 05, 2007, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.; and
Thursday, December 06, 2007 from 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. The meeting
may close early if all business is finished. Written material and
requests to make oral presentations should reach the Coast Guard on or
before November 20, 2007. Requests to have a copy of your material
distributed to each member of the committee should reach the Coast
Guard on or before November 20, 2007.

ADDRESSES: NAVSAC will meet in the Phoenix Park Hotel, 520 N. Capitol
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001. Send written material and requests
to make oral presentations to Mr. John Bobb, Commandant (CG-54121),
U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street, SW., Washington, DC
20593-0001. This notice is available on our online docket, USCG-2007-
0028 at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mike Sollosi, Executive Director
of NAVSAC, or Mr. John Bobb, Assistant to the Executive Director,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER> or e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of the meeting is given under the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (Pub. L. 92-493).

Agenda of Meeting

    The agenda for the December 4-6, 2007 NAVSAC meeting is as follows:
    (1) Introduction and swearing-in of new members.
    (2) VTS Program.
    (3) Navigation Subcommittee Report.
    (4) NOAA Update.

Procedural

    The meeting is open to the public. Please note that the meeting may
close early if all business is finished. At the Chair's discretion,
members of the public may make oral presentations during the meeting.
If you would like to make an oral presentation at the meeting, please
notify the Executive Director no later than November 20, 2007. Written
material for distribution at the meeting should reach the Coast Guard
no later than November 20, 2007. If you would like a copy of your
material distributed to each member of the committee in advance of the
meeting, please submit 20 copies to the Executive Director no later
than November 20, 2007.

Information on Services for Individuals With Disabilities

    For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the meeting, contact
the Executive Director as soon as possible.

    Dated: October 29, 2007.
Wayne A. Muilenburg,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Waterways Management.
 [FR Doc. E7-21588 Filed 11-1-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


Thank you for your participation in this important survey!
Please write any comments you may have on this survey below.
OMB Control No. 2090-0028                      Approval expires 6/30/2015

NOTE THAT PAGE NUMBERS ARE OUT OF SEQUENCE ON THIS REVIEW DRAFT ELECTRONIC FILE SO THAT IT WILL PRINT CORRECTLY DOUBLE-SIDED
Photo sequence showing reduced water at a location on the Santa Cruz River. At this location, it changed from having year-round flow to being dry except during stormflows. Open this survey to learn more and to submit your opinion on Santa Cruz River management.

                                   Survey:
                           Your Opinion Needed on an
                              Arizona River Issue
                                                                                We need the following questions to ensure votes from all groups   have been fairly represented in this survey.
Question 15: 	What year were you born?   19__ __
Question 16: 	Are you male or female?       O  Male	           O  Female
Question 17: 	How many years have you lived in Arizona? ______________
Question 18: 	Including yourself, how many people currently live at your  	 	residence? ______________
Question 19: 	How many of those people are 18 or older? ________________
Question 20: 	Does anyone in your household belong to an environmental 	organization (such as Sierra Club, or National Audubon Society)?
O  Yes	           O  No
Question 21: From the following options, do you consider yourself to be:
O  American Indian	 	O  Latino/Hispanic
O  Asian			O  White
O  African American		O  Other __________________________
Question 22: From the following income categories, please indicate the one that  	            		includes your estimated household income for 2012.
O  Less than $20,000  	O  $80,000 to $99,000
O  $20,000 to $39,999  	O  $100,000 to $149,999
O  $40,000 to $59,999  	O  Above $150,000
O  $60,000 to $79,999

d

This survey asks for your opinion on how to manage the Santa Cruz River. It is important for authorities to hear from all perspectives, so please take the time to read the background and answer the questions. Your responses will help authorities select the best option. This survey is being sent to randomly selected households in southern Arizona.

The Santa Cruz River is in southern Arizona. It flows north through several communities such as Rio Rico, Tubac, Amado, Green Valley, Sahuarita, Tucson, and Marana. It also flows through Tumacácori National Park near the border with Mexico. The Santa Cruz joins the Gila River south of Phoenix which then joins the Colorado River at Yuma. People have lived in the Santa Cruz valley for thousands of years, and water was found in the Santa Cruz River in some places all-year. Pumping groundwater over the last 80 to 100 years lowered groundwater levels and dried up many of the wet areas along the river.

23
2
             THE SANTA CRUZ RIVER IN             SOUTHERN ARIZONA
   TREATED WASTEWATER IN                               THE SANTA CRUZ RIVER

Question 14:  How much did the following factors affect your answers for
Q 2 to Q6?  Check one box for each.

         Since the 1950's, treated wastewater has been released into the Santa Cruz River in two places, in the North near Tucson, and in the South near the border with Mexico. At first this was just a method of disposing of the treated wastewater. It was then found that the water is helping to provide wet river ecosystems, and associated plants and animals that are scarce in southern Arizona. The treatment is currently being upgraded to provide water of higher quality and to eliminate odor. Having wastewater of higher quality raises new questions about how to best manage the water.

d

                   Effect on my answers for questions 2 - 4

                                   Very Low

                                   Moderate

                                   Very High
.

Wanting more visible flow and or more forest
                                     1
                                      2
                                     3
                                      4
                                      5
Wanting to benefit river ecosystems
                                     1
                                      2
                                     3
                                      4
                                      5
Wanting to improve recreational opportunities
                                     1
                                      2
                                     3
                                      4
                                      5
Wanting to improve river conditions close to my home
                                     1
                                      2
                                     3
                                      4
                                      5
Wanting to pay my fair share for the environment
                                     1
                                      2
                                     3
                                      4
                                      5
Wanting to improve water quality
                                     1
                                      2
                                     3
                                      4
                                      5
Wanting to improve river conditions for future generations
                                     1
                                      2
                                     3
                                      4
                                      5
Wanting to minimize increases in taxes or costs to my household
                                     1
                                      2
                                     3
                                      4
                                      5
Other____________________________________________________
                                     1
                                      2
                                     3
                                      4
                                      5

3
                          NORTH
Treated wastewater now supports about 23 miles of flow, and about 160 acres of forest along the river. The flow starts in NW Tucson near Prince Rd and I-10 and flows past Marana.

22
3
SOUTH
Treated wastewater now supports about 19 miles of flow, and about 490 acres of forest along the river. The flow starts in southern Rio Rico and flows past Tubac.

                          WHAT HAPPENS TO THE WATER?

                                   Activity

     Not                   Somewhat                   Very
Important              Important                Important

Walking
    1              2              3              4               5
Biking
    1              2              3              4               5
Safe Partial Body Contact with Water (wading)
    1              2              3              4               5
Safe Full Body Contact with Water (submersion)
    1              2              3              4               5
Birdwatching
    1              2              3              4               5
Horseback Riding
    1              2              3              4               5
Off Road Vehicle Use
    1              2              3              4               5
Flood Viewing
    1              2              3              4               5
Picnicking
    1              2              3              4               5
Other_______________________________________

    1              2              3              4               5

Question 13: Rate the importance of different recreational activities for
your household along the Santa Cruz River or along its riverbanks

   * About 10% of the treated wastewater evaporates or is consumed by plants and animals, the remaining 90% becomes groundwater.

   * Of the 10% consumed, most of it is used by trees. An acre of forest along the river requires about as much water as 44 people per year. An acre is almost the same size as a football field without the endzones.

21
10%

Evaporation, Plant Use, & Animal Use
4
To Groundwater

  90%

        WHAT DOES THE WATER MEAN                  FOR THE ENVIRONMENT?

   * The constant release of treated wastewater supports a wet river ecosystem that used to be more common in southern Arizona.

   * If a river does not have water year-round there is still an ecosystem, just not a wet river ecosystem.

   * The wet river ecosystem along the Santa Cruz River includes cottonwood and willow trees, tall shade trees dependent on moist soil.  This is one of the rarest forest types in southern Arizona.

   * In the desert, wet river ecosystems contain a large concentration of plant and animal species. Along the wet areas of the Santa Cruz River, there is a variety of birds and small mammals, and minnow-sized fish have been found.

20
5
Question 12:
   * How often do members of your household engage in recreation where rivers, streams, canals, dry washes, or arroyos are an important part of the experience?  Examples are a car trip to a river, or walking to a river. Just write "0" if there are no such trips and go to Q13.
	_____________ trips per year.

   * How many of those trips are within a 2 hour drive of your home?
            _____________ trips per year.

   * How many of those trips are within your city or community?
            _____________ trips per year.

   * How many of those trips involve any portion of the Santa Cruz River?
	_____________ trips per year.

   > Note that there are less forest acres per mile of flow in the North than the South.

   > In the South, treated wastewater results in 4 to 5 times more forest per mile of flow. This is because adding treated wastewater in the South allows tree roots to reach the groundwater which is relatively close to the surface there.

   > Refer to the photos on the next page to compare typical scenes of the North and South. Photos are also shown downstream of where water flows currently end.

   * FLOW & FOREST:  People can vote to maintain more miles of river flow and cottonwood and willow forest acres in the North and the South. This is in contrast to the Expected Future which cuts back flows and forest acreage. Again, the current condition is 23 flow miles and 160 forest acres in the North, and 19 flow miles and 490 forest acres in the South. Choosing Flow & Forest more than the Expected Future would mean an increase in taxes to pay for the water consumed by the larger wet river ecosystem.

                     .

   > All options including the Expected Future include the new wastewater treatment upgrades that increase water quality and eliminate odor.

   * EXPECTED FUTURE:  In the future, river flows are expected to be cut back to reduce the amount of water used by the river ecosystem. This would reduce the extent of river flow and the wet river ecosystem to 12 flow miles and 45 forest acres in the North, and 10 miles and 250 forest acres in the South. There would still be trees, plants, birds, mammals, and minnow-sized fish in the North and South. This option does not require new taxpayer costs.

                     .

19
6
Question 10: If you voted for an option with more Flow & Forest than
"Expected Future", in Q2 to Q6, why?
CHOOSE ONE ANSWER THAT FITS BEST
O  NEVER CHOSE more Flow & Forest than Expected Future.
O  Prefer visible flow in the river
O  Prefer more vegetation along the river
O  Prefer both more flow and more vegetation along the river
O  I was forced to choose Flow & Forest in order to get Full Body Contact
O  Other reasons: ____________________________________

Question 11: If you voted for an option containing "Full Body Contact" in Q2 to
Q6, why?
CHOOSE ONE ANSWER THAT FITS BEST
O  NEVER CHOSE an option that included "Full Body Contact"
O  My household is interested in recreational contact with the treated water
O  I want other people to be able to recreationally contact the treated water
O  I was forced to choose Full Body Contact in order to get Flow & Forest
O  Other reasons: ____________________________________

              YOU WILL BE ASKED TO VOTE ON THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS

   > Photos show the changes that could happen in the North and South if a part of the river no longer receives treated wastewater.

                             North With Water Flow

                        North Downstream of Water Flow

                        South Downstream of Water Flow

                             South With Water Flow

7
Question 7:  Before reading this survey were you aware of the location of any part of the Santa Cruz River?
O  Yes
O  No

Question 8:  Before reading this survey were you aware that the Santa Cruz River has water all-year in the two places shown on page 3?
CHOOSE ONE ANSWER THAT FITS BEST
O  Aware of the water in the North
O  Aware of the water in the South
O  Aware of the water in both the North and the South
O  Not aware of the water in the North or the South

Question 9:  If you ever voted for "Expected Future" in Q2 to Q6, why?
CHOOSE ONE ANSWER THAT FITS BEST
O  Never chose "Expected Future"
O  No ability to pay
O  Other options were not worth it to my household
O  Prefer to make a donation than to increase taxes
O  Don't think the other options are realistic
O  Other________________________

QUESTION 6
 If you ever chose an option that kept river flow and habitat, why? Choose the reason that is the best match
O  NEVER CHOSE Options B or C
O  Prefer visible flow in the river
O  Prefer to have more forest
O  Prefer higher habitat value
O  Other________________________

18

   Question 6.  Given a choice between Expected Future, Option A, and Option B for the Santa Cruz River, how would you vote?

   * FULL BODY CONTACT:  During stormflows, the water quality is not considered safe for any type of human contact. However, during low-flow times the water in the North and South is currently considered safe for wading. Water quality could be improved to be considered safe for full body contact such as submersion during low-flow times. This would require further controls on bacteria, which would mean an increase in taxes to pay for these controls.

                             Location & Effect

                               Expected Future

                                    Option A
                                    Option B
                                    North
                              Flow & Forest

                                 12 flow miles
                               45 forest acres

                                 17 flow miles
                                95 forest acres
                                 12 flow miles
                               45 forest acres

                                    North
                               Full Body Contact

                                      No
                                      Yes
                                      Yes

                                     South
                               Flow & Forest

                                10 flow miles
                               250 forest acres

                                 19 flow miles
                               490 forest acres
                                10 flow miles
                               250 forest acres

                                     South
                               Full Body Contact

                                      No
                                      Yes
                                      No

                                       $
                        Cost to your Household per Year

                                      $0
                         Increase in      Annual Taxes
                                      $50
                                 Increase in
                                 Annual Taxes
                                      $20
                                 Increase in
                                 Annual Taxes
                              HOW WOULD YOU VOTE?
                               (CHOOSE ONE ONLY)

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                Expected Future

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                   Option A

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                   Option B

17
8
This concludes the description of the options. Different options for "Flow and

Forest" and "Full Body Contact" are possible for the North and South. You will

have an opportunity to vote on different options, including "Expected Future".
8
 EXAMPLE VOTE                                  questions will look like the sample below

   Question 5.  Given a choice between Expected Future, Option A, and Option B for the Santa Cruz River, how would you vote?

                             Location & Effect

                               Expected Future

                                    Option A
                                    Option B
                                    North
                              Flow & Forest

                                 12 flow miles
                               45 forest acres

                                 23 flow miles
                               160 forest acres
                                 17 flow miles
                                95 forest acres
                                    North
                               Full Body Contact

                                      No
                                      No
                                      Yes

                                     South
                               Flow & Forest

                                10 flow miles
                               250 forest acres

                                 15 flow miles
                               385 forest acres
                                 19 flow miles
                               490 forest acres
                                     South
                               Full Body Contact

                                      No
                                      Yes
                                      No

                                       $
                        Cost to your Household per Year

                                      $0

Increase in      Annual Taxes                                      $15
                                 Increase in
                                 Annual Taxes
                                      $20
                                 Increase in
                                 Annual Taxes
                              HOW WOULD YOU VOTE?
                               (CHOOSE ONE ONLY)

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                Expected Future

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                   Option A

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                   Option B

                             Location & Effect

                               Expected Future

                                    Option A
                                    Option B
                                    North
                              Flow & Forest

                                 12 flow miles
                               45 forest acres

                                 23 flow miles
                               160 forest acres
                                 12 flow miles
                               45 forest acres

                                    North
                               Full Body Contact

                                      No
                                      No
                                      No

                                     South
                               Flow & Forest

                                10 flow miles
                               250 forest acres

                                10 flow miles
                               250 forest acres

                                 19 flow miles
                               490 forest acres
                                     South
                               Full Body Contact

                                      No
                                      No
                                      No

                                       $
                        Cost to your Household per Year

                                      $0
                         Increase in      Annual Taxes
                                      $20
                                 Increase in
                                 Annual Taxes
                                      $20
                                 Increase in
                                 Annual Taxes
                  HOW WOULD YOU VOTE?       (CHOOSE ONE ONLY)

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                Expected Future

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                   Option A

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                   Option B

16
                                If you prefer
                               Expected Future,
                                  check here

                                If you prefer
                                   Option A,
                                  check here

                                If you prefer
                                   Option B,
                                  check here

9

                             Location & Effect

                               Expected Future

                                    Option A
                                    Option B
                                    North
                              Flow & Forest

                                 12 flow miles
                               45 forest acres

                                 12 flow miles
                               45 forest acres

                                 12 flow miles
                               45 forest acres

                                    North
                               Full Body Contact

                                      No
                                      No
                                      No

                                     South
                               Flow & Forest

                                10 flow miles
                               250 forest acres

                                 15 flow miles
                               385 forest acres
                                 19 flow miles
                               490 forest acres
                                     South
                               Full Body Contact

                                      No
                                      Yes
                                      No

                                       $
                        Cost to your Household per Year

                                      $0
                         Increase in      Annual Taxes
                                      $10
                                 Increase in
                                 Annual Taxes
                                      $5
                                 Increase in
                                 Annual Taxes
                              HOW WOULD YOU VOTE?
                               (CHOOSE ONE ONLY)

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                Expected Future

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                   Option A

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                   Option B

                             Location & Effect

Description

                                    North
                               Flow & Forest

Approximate Miles of year-round flow; &
Approximate Acres of cottonwood/willow forest along the river, tall shade trees dependent on wet soils.

                                    North
                               Full Body Contact

Yes it is safe for full body contact at low-flow times, or No, it is only safe for wading at low-flow times.

                                     South
                              Flow & Forest

Approximate Miles of year-round flow; &
Approximate Acres of cottonwood/willow forest along the river, tall shade trees dependent on wet soils.

                                    South
                               Full Body Contact

Yes it is safe for full body contact at low-flow times, or No, it is only safe for wading at low-flow times.

                                       $
                        Cost to your Household per Year

How much the option will cost your household in unavoidable taxes per year. These taxes would not increase or decrease over time.
            THIS SURVEY IS SIMILAR TO                 A PUBLIC VOTE

15
The questions starting on the next page ask you how you would vote for different options for the Santa Cruz River.

Effects of each Option will be described with the following information:

   Question 4.  Given a choice between Expected Future, Option A, and Option B for the Santa Cruz River, how would you vote?

10

                             Location & Effect

     Not                           Somewhat                         Very
Important                      Important                     Important

                                    North
                              Flow & Forest

         1              2              3              4               5
                                    North
                               Full Body Contact

         1              2              3              4               5
                                    South
                              Flow & Forest

         1              2              3              4               5
                                    South
                               Full Body Contact

         1              2              3              4               5
                                       $
                        Cost to your Household per Year

         1              2              3              4               5
   Question 3.  Given a choice between Expected Future, Option A, and Option B for the Santa Cruz River, how would you vote?

              HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF THESE EFFECTS?

Question 1.  Rate each of the following in terms of their importance to your household.  For each, use "1" for the least important, and "5" for the most important.

11
14

                             Location & Effect

                               Expected Future

                                    Option A
                                    Option B
                                    North
                              Flow & Forest

                                 12 flow miles
                               45 forest acres

                                 17 flow miles
                                95 forest acres
                                 17 flow miles
                                95 forest acres
                                    North
                               Full Body Contact

                                      No
                                      No
                                      Yes

                                     South
                               Flow & Forest

                                10 flow miles
                               250 forest acres

                                10 flow miles
                               250 forest acres

                                10 flow miles
                               250 forest acres

                                     South
                               Full Body Contact

                                      No
                                      No
                                      No

                                       $
                        Cost to your Household per Year

                                      $0
                         Increase in      Annual Taxes
                                      $5
                                 Increase in
                                 Annual Taxes
                                      $10
                                 Increase in
                                 Annual Taxes
                              HOW WOULD YOU VOTE?
                               (CHOOSE ONE ONLY)

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                Expected Future

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                   Option A

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                   Option B

                             Location & Effect

                               Expected Future

                                    Option A
                                    Option B
                                    North
                              Flow & Forest

                                 12 flow miles
                               45 forest acres

                                 17 flow miles
                                95 forest acres
                                 23 flow miles
                               160 forest acres
                                    North
                               Full Body Contact

                                      No
                                      Yes
                                      No

                                     South
                               Flow & Forest

                                10 flow miles
                               250 forest acres

                                 15 flow miles
                               385 forest acres
                                 19 flow miles
                               490 forest acres
                                     South
                               Full Body Contact

                                      No
                                      Yes
                                      No

                                       $
                        Cost to your Household per Year

                                      $0
                         Increase in      Annual Taxes
                                      $35
                                 Increase in
                                 Annual Taxes
                                      $15
                                 Increase in
                                 Annual Taxes
                              HOW WOULD YOU VOTE?
                               (CHOOSE ONE ONLY)

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                Expected Future

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                   Option A

                                     
                                  I vote for
                                   Option B

   Question 2.  Given a choice between Expected Future, Option A, and Option B for the Santa Cruz River, how would you vote?

13
12
                 AS YOU VOTE, REMEMBER THESE IMPORTANT DETAILS

   +      There are 3 voting questions, each on a different page.

   +      Each question describes a different tradeoff to help us better understand your household's opinion.

   +      Review each question carefully.  Your votes are important and will help determine the best option for the Santa Cruz River.

   +      Costs to your household will range from $0 to $50 per year, depending on the option.  All funds are legally guaranteed to be used for the designated purpose.

   +      The "Expected Future" option shows the expected future at no added cost. Choose this if other options are not worth it to your household.


[Federal Register: September 18, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 180)]
[Notices]
[Page 47947-47948]
[DOCID:fr18se09-72]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-D-0427]

Draft Guidance for Industry: Clinical Considerations for
Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines; Availability

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft document entitled ``Guidance for Industry:
Clinical Considerations for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines'' dated
September 2009. The draft guidance document provides recommendations to
sponsors who wish to submit an Investigational New Drug application
(IND) for a therapeutic cancer vaccine on critical clinical
considerations for investigational studies of these products. The draft
guidance applies to therapeutic cancer vaccines that are intended to be
administered to patients with an existing cancer for the purpose of
treatment. The draft guidance does not apply to products intended to be
administered to patients to prevent or decrease the incidence of cancer
and does not apply to adoptive immunotherapeutic products such as T
cell or NK cell products.

DATES:  Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21
CFR 10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency considers your comment on
this draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit written or electronic comments on the draft guidance
by December 17, 2009.

ADDRESSES:  Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance to the Office of Communication, Outreach and Development (HFM-
40), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852-
1448. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist the office in
processing your requests. The draft guidance may also be obtained by
mail by calling CBER at 1-800-835-4709 or<PHONE_NUMBER>. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft
guidance document.
    Submit written comments on the draft guidance to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori Jo Churchyard, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research (HFM-17), Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852-
1448,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft document entitled
``Guidance for Industry: Clinical Considerations for Therapeutic Cancer
Vaccines'' dated September 2009. The draft guidance document provides
recommendations to sponsors who wish to submit an IND for a therapeutic
cancer vaccine on critical clinical considerations for early and late
phase investigational studies intended to support a biologics license
application. Development of a therapeutic cancer vaccine can present
different considerations for clinical trial design than development of
a traditional cytotoxic drug or biological product, due to differences
in the proposed

mechanisms of action. The draft guidance applies to therapeutic cancer
vaccines intended to be administered to patients with an existing
cancer for the purpose of treatment. It does not apply to products
intended to be administered to patients to prevent or decrease the
incidence of cancer. Also, it does not apply to adoptive
immunotherapeutic products such as T cell or NK cell products.
    The draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent FDA's current thinking on this topic. It does
not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not
operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used
if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    The draft guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collections of information in 21 CFR part 312 have been approved under
OMB control number 0910-0014; and the collections of information in 21
CFR part 50 on informed consent have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0130.

III. Comments

    The draft guidance is being distributed for comment purposes only
and is not intended for implementation at this time. Interested persons
may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
written or electronic comments regarding the draft guidance. Submit a
single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any mailed
comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy. Comments
are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. A copy of the draft guidance and received
comments are available for public examination in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

IV. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the draft guidance
at either http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/
GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/default.htm or http://
www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: September 15, 2009.
David Horowitz,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-22531 Filed 9-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28820-28821]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10104]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER22-1794-000]

Green USA, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Green USA, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.

    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is May 25, 2022.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 5, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10104 Filed 5-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: February 23, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 36)]
[Notices]
[Page 9406-9407]
[DOCID:fr23fe06-108]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-53315; File No. SR-PCX-2006-09]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Extending
the SizeQuote Mechanism Pilot Program for a Period of One Year

February 15, 2006.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 6, 2006, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``PCX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by PCX. The Exchange filed the
proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to
section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act\3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\
which renders it effective upon filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    PCX proposes to amend its rules in order to extend the SizeQuote
Mechanism Pilot Program (``Pilot Program'') contained in PCX Rule
6.47(g), for a one-year period ending February 15, 2007. The text of
the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site
(http://www.pacificex.com), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary

and at the Commission.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the PCX included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposal is to extend for one year the
Exchange's SizeQuote Mechanism Pilot Program (``Pilot Program''). The
current Pilot Program, established when the PCX filed SR-PCX-2005-
35,\5\ was effective upon filing, and expires on February 15, 2006. At
the time SR-PCX-2005-35 was filed, the Exchange represented that at the
completion of the Pilot Program the PCX would provide to the Commission
a report summarizing the effectiveness of the SizeQuote program. While
the Exchange believes that the SizeQuote Mechanism can be an effective
tool for Floor Brokers to use while executing large size orders in open
outcry, the mechanism has not been used frequently enough to supply
sufficient evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of the Pilot Program.
In order to allow for additional time to compile sufficient evidence as
to the effectiveness of the Pilot Program, the PCX proposes to extend
the Pilot Program for a one-year period ending February 15, 2007. At
the end of the extended Pilot Program the PCX feels it will be able to
supply the Commission with a report summarizing the effectiveness of
the program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51576 (April 19,
2005), 70 FR 21488 (April 26, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with section 6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it
is designed to facilitate transactions in securities, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade and to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited
nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:
    (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest;
    (ii) Impose any significant burden on competition; and
    (iii) Become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was
filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act\8\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\9\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of
the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such
rule change if it appears to the Commission such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). Pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
under the Act, the Exchange is required to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Commission notes that the Exchange provided notice of the filing
at least five business days prior to the date of filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under section 19b-4(f)(6) normally may
not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of its filing.\10\
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) permits the Commission to designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest.\11\ PCX has requested that the Commission waive
the 30-day operative delay. The Commission believes that waiving the
30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest so that the Pilot Program may continue until
February 15, 2007 without interruption.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \11\ Id.
    \12\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-PCX-2006-09 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2006-09. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2006-09 and should be
submitted on or before March 16, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-2535 Filed 2-22-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P