[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 249 (Thursday, December 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80257-80258]
[FR Doc No: 2022-28335]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2021-0096; Notice 2]

Hercules Tire & Rubber Company, Receipt of Petition for Decision
of Inconsequential Noncompliance; Correction

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NHTSA published a document in the Federal Register of August
10, 2022, concerning request for comments on a petition for a decision
of inconsequential noncompliance submitted by Hercules Tire & Rubber
Company, (Hercules), for certain radial trailer tires that do not fully
comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New
Pneumatic Tires for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of More Than 4,536
Kilograms (10,000 Pounds), Specialty Tires, and Tires for Motorcycles.
The document contained the incorrect docket number and the incorrect
FMVSS in section ``III. Noncompliance.''

DATES: The comment period for the notice published August 10, 2022, at
87 FR 48760, is extended. Comments should be received on or before
January 30, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
     Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
except for Federal Holidays.
     Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Comments may also be faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
    All comments and supporting materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated

above will be filed in the docket and will be considered. All comments
and supporting materials received after the closing date will also be
filed and will be considered to the fullest extent possible.
    When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated at the end of this notice.
    All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this petition is shown
in the heading of this notice.
    DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jayton Lindley, General Engineer,
NHTSA, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Correction: In the Federal Register of
August 10, 2022, in FR Doc. 2022-17131, appearing at 87 FR 48760, on
page 48760, in the first column, correct the docket number heading to
read: [Docket No. NHTSA-2021-0096; Notice 1]
    On page 48761, in the first column, correct the ``III.
Noncompliance'' section to read:
    III. Noncompliance: Hercules explains that the noncompliance is due
to a mold error in which the subject tires contain a tire
identification number (TIN) with the second and third numerical symbols
in the date code transposed and therefore, do not meet the requirements
of paragraph S6.5(b) of FMVSS No. 119. Specifically, the TIN on the
subject tires incorrectly states the date code as ``4280,'' when it
should state ``4820.''

Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-28335 Filed 12-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 60736]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19034]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2022-0098]

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    Under part 211 of title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this
document provides the public notice that on August 27, 2023, Brightline
Trains Florida LLC (BLF) \1\ petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) for a waiver of compliance from 49 CFR 213.353(e),
Turnouts, crossovers, and lift rail assemblies or other transition
devices on moveable bridges. For administrative convenience, FRA has
placed BLF's petition in Docket Number FRA-2022-0098.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Florida East Coast Railway (FEC) owns the track involved in
this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    BLF explains that its request for relief is proposed to enable BLF
to proceed with the critical testing processes of Positive Train
Control (PTC) Field Qualification Testing (FQT), PTC Simulated Revenue
Service Demonstration (SRSD), and Simulated Service Demonstration (SSD)
\2\ on the segment of its Phase 2 project connecting West Palm Beach,
Florida, with Cocoa, Florida (Phase 2 N/S Corridor). As such, BLF
requests that the waiver apply to train movements necessary in support
of PTC Testing and crew qualification and would expire upon completion
of SSD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The simulated service demonstration referenced by BLF will
be conducted pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 20170.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Paragraph (e) of 49 CFR 213.353 requires all hand operated switches
to be equipped with a redundant operating mechanism for maintaining the
security of switch point position. BLF notes that there are 55 hand
operated switches in its Phase 2 N/S Corridor, although the proposed
waiver would only apply to 31 switches that are located in Class 6
track. BLF explains existing mitigations will be in place for the
purpose of completing testing and service demonstration (i.e., the PTC
system will provide protection for improperly lined switches through
enforcement of the protecting signals and after passing a signal, if a
switch in the block becomes improperly lined, the automatic train
control (ATC) system will enforce the most restrictive cab signal
state).
    BLF asks for expedited review given scheduled start of the
referenced testing.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment and a public hearing, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and must be submitted to www.regulations.gov,
with a copy to Carolyn Hayward-Williams, Director, Office of Railroad
Systems and Technology, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email: [email protected].
    Communications received by September 12, 2023 will be considered by
FRA before final action is taken. FRA reserves the right to make an
initial decision in this docket in advance of the close of the comment
period and contingent upon subsequent consideration of any comments
submitted to the docket within the comment period.
    Anyone can search the electronic form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)
solicits comments from the public to better inform its processes. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See also https://www.regulations.gov/privacy-notice for the privacy notice of
regulations.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
John Karl Alexy,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-19034 Filed 9-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 61 (Monday, March 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 18098]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07035]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-71790; File No. SR-ICEEU-2014-01]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Europe Limited; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change Regarding New Permitted Cover

March 25, 2014.

I. Introduction

    On February 4, 2014, ICE Clear Europe Limited (``ICE Clear
Europe'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change SR-ICEEU-2014-01 pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\2\ The proposed rule change was published
for comment in the Federal Register on February 18, 2014.\3\ The
Commission received no comment letters regarding the proposed changes.
For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is granting approval of
the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-71518 (February 11,
2014), 79 FR 9304 (February 18, 2014) (SR-ICEEU-2014-01).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description

    ICE Clear Europe is proposing to permit Clearing Members of ICE
Clear Europe to post certain Japanese Government Bonds (``JGBs''),
Japanese Treasury Bills (``JTBs'') and Japanese Treasury Discount Bills
(``JTDBs'' together with JGBs and JTBs, the ``New Permitted Cover'') to
ICE Clear Europe in order to meet initial margin, original margin and
certain other margin requirements, including delivery margin
requirements. The New Permitted Cover will not be accepted to satisfy
variation margin requirements or guaranty fund requirements.
    ICE Clear Europe has stated that the New Permitted Cover will
provide its Clearing Members with a greater range of high-quality
collateral that can be posted to ICE Clear Europe. Furthermore, ICE
Clear Europe has stated that (1) the New Permitted Cover is of minimal
credit risk comparable to that of other sovereign debt currently
accepted by ICE Clear Europe as permitted cover for margin obligations,
and (2) the New Permitted Cover has demonstrated low volatility in
stressed and normal market conditions.
    ICE Clear Europe has established initial valuation haircut levels
and concentration limitations for the New Permitted Cover, and proposes
to review and modify such haircuts and limitations from time to time in
accordance with the Rules and procedures.
    The New Permitted Cover may only constitute up to 10% of a Clearing
Member's total initial and original margin requirement, up to a maximum
amount of JPY 100 billion. The New Permitted Cover will be subject to a
valuation haircut of 3%, except that JGBs with a maturity of more than
eleven years will be subject to a valuation haircut of 5%. The
concentration limitations apply on an aggregate basis across all
product categories. Upon a Clearing Member's use of New Permitted Cover
to cover a margin requirement denominated in a different currency, ICE
Clear Europe has stated than an additional haircut will apply, in
accordance with existing rules, in order to cover exchange rate risk.
    ICE Clear Europe has also stated that it has commenced accepting
the New Permitted Cover as of June 28, 2013.

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \4\ directs the Commission to
approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if the
Commission finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such self-regulatory organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F)
of the Act \5\ requires, among other things, that the rules of a
clearing agency are designed to promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent
applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions, to
assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the
custody or control of the clearing agency and for which it is
responsible and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act,\6\ as Clearing Members
of ICE Clear Europe will have access to a greater range of collateral
that ICE Clear Europe has determined to be of high quality to satisfy
certain margin requirements, and the New Permitted Cover will be
subject to appropriate valuation haircuts and concentration limits,
which will be reviewed and modified periodically by ICE Clear Europe in
accordance with its Rules and procedures. The proposed rule changes
will thereby (1) promote the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent applicable,
derivatives agreements, contracts, and transactions; and (2) help to
protect investors and the public interest, consistent with the
requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in
particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \8\ and the
rules and regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\9\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-ICEEU-2014-01) be,
and hereby is, approved.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \10\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-07035 Filed 3-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8140-8143]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03219]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2015-2460; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-163-AD;
Amendment 39-18396; AD 2016-04-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2010-26-10,
which applied to certain The Boeing Company Model 747-200C, -200F, -
400, -400D, and -400F series airplanes. AD 2010-26-10 required
repetitive inspections for cracking of the lap joints, modification of
certain lap joints, and certain post-repair inspections of the lap
joints. This new AD adds new repetitive post-modification inspections
for cracking in the lap joints, and repair if necessary. This AD was
prompted by an evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH) which
indicated that certain lap joints are subject to widespread fatigue
damage (WFD). We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue
cracking in certain lap joints, which could result in rapid
depressurization and consequent reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective March 24, 2016.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 24,
2016.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the

FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
2460.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
2460; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathan Weigand, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:
425-917-6590; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2010-26-10, Amendment 39-16549 (75 FR 81427,
December 28, 2010). AD 2010-26-10 applied to certain The Boeing Company
Model 747-200C, -200F, -400, -400D, and -400F series airplanes. The
NPRM published in the Federal Register on July 9, 2015 (80 FR 39394).
The NPRM was prompted by an evaluation by the DAH that indicated that
certain lap joints are subject to WFD. The NPRM proposed to continue to
require repetitive inspections for cracking of the lap joints,
modification of certain lap joints, and certain post-repair inspections
of the lap joints. The NPRM also proposed to require new repetitive
post-modification inspections for cracking in the lap joints, and
repair if necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
fatigue cracking in certain lap joints, which could result in rapid
depressurization and consequent reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM (80
FR 39394, July 9, 2015) and the FAA's response to each comment. United
Airlines concurred with the NPRM.

Request To Correct Typographical Error

    Boeing asked that we correct the reference in the ``Related Service
Information under 1 CFR part 51'' from ``. . . sections 41, 42, and
43'' to ``. . . sections 41, 42, and 46.'' Boeing stated that section
43 should be section 46, and noted that this is a typographical error.
    We agree with the commenter's request for the reason provided. We
have corrected this typographical error in ``Related Service
Information under 1 CFR part 51'' accordingly.

Request To Clarify Certain Requirements

    Boeing asked that we clarify paragraph (i)(1) of the proposed AD
(80 FR 39394, July 9, 2015) by including ``per Table 7'' in that
paragraph. Boeing also asked that we clarify paragraph (i)(3) of the
proposed AD by including ``per Table 10'' in that paragraph.
    We agree that clarification is necessary but we do not agree to
change paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(3) of this AD. Paragraph (i) of this
AD specifies doing the applicable inspections in paragraphs (i)(1),
(i)(2), or (i)(3) of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the referenced service information; and repeating the
applicable inspections at the applicable times specified in Tables 7,
8, 9, and 10 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2499, Revision 3, dated July 15, 2014. In each of these
tables the applicable groups are identified and match the groups
identified in paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3) of this AD. We
refer to the tables in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of service
information for the applicable compliance times and not for how to
accomplish the required actions. Therefore, we have not changed this AD
in this regard.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD as proposed, with minor editorial changes. We have determined
that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (80 FR 39394, July 9, 2015) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (80 FR 39394, July 9, 2015).

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2499, Revision 3,
dated July 15, 2014. The service information describes procedures for
body skin lap joint inspections and modifications in sections 41, 42,
and 46. This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 120 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                     Labor cost          Parts cost     Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-modification inspections     Up to 675 work-hours x               $0  Up to $57,375 per   Up to $6,885,000
 [retained action from AD 2010-   $85 per hour = up to                     inspection cycle.   per inspection
 26-10, Amendment 39-16549 (75    $57,375.                                                     cycle.
 FR 81427, December 28, 2010)].
Modification [retained action    Up to 5,819 work-hours                0  Up to $494,615....  Up to $59,353,800.
 from AD 2010-26-10, Amendment    x $85 per hour = up to
 39-16549 (75 FR 81427,           $494,615.
 December 28, 2010)].
New proposed post-modification   Up to 105 work-hours x                0  Up to $8,925 per    Up to $1,071,000
 inspections.                     $85 per hour = up to                     inspection cycle.   per inspection
                                  $8,925.                                                      cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
a cost estimate for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2010-26-10, Amendment 39-16549 (75 FR 81427, December 28, 2010), and
adding the following new AD:

2016-04-02 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18396; Docket No. FAA-
2015-2460; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-163-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective March 24, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2010-26-10, Amendment 39-16549 (75 FR 81427,
December 28, 2010).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-200C, -200F, -
400, -400D, and -400F series airplanes; certificated in any
category; as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2499, Revision 3, dated July 15, 2014.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval
holder indicating that certain lap joints are subject to widespread
fatigue damage. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue
cracking in certain lap joints, which could result in rapid
depressurization and consequent reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Repetitive Lap Joint Inspections

    At the applicable time specified in Table 1 and Table 3 of
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-53A2499, Revision 3, dated July 15, 2014, except as required by
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD: Do eddy current inspections for cracks
in the skin of the lap joints, and do all applicable repairs, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2499, Revision 3, dated July 15, 2014,
except as required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD. Do all applicable
repairs before further flight. Repeat the applicable inspections
thereafter at intervals not to exceed those specified in Table 1 and
Table 3 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2499, Revision 3, dated July 15, 2014.

(h) Lap Joint Modification

    At the applicable time specified in Tables 2, 4, 5, and 6 of
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-53A2499, Revision 3, dated July 15, 2014, except as required by
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD: Modify the applicable lap joints, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2499, Revision 3, dated July 15, 2014,
except as required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD. Accomplishment of
the modification required by this paragraph terminates the
repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD for the
length of the modified lap joint.

(i) Lap Joint Post-Modification Inspections

    At the applicable time specified in Tables 7, 8, 9, and 10 of
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-53A2499, Revision 3, dated July 15, 2014, except as required by
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD: Do the applicable inspections specified
in paragraph (i)(1), (i)(2), or (i)(3) of this AD, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2499, Revision 3, dated July 15, 2014. Repeat the
applicable inspections thereafter at the applicable times specified
in Tables 7, 8, 9, and 10 of paragraph 1.E, ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2499, Revision 3, dated July
15, 2014. If any crack is found during any inspection, repair before
further flight using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this AD.
    (1) For airplanes identified as Groups 2 through 5 and 8 through
10 in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2499, Revision 3, dated
July 15, 2014: Internal detailed and surface high frequency eddy
current (HFEC) inspections for any crack in the skin or internal
doubler.
    (2) For airplanes identified as Groups 6, 11, and 19 in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2499, Revision 3, dated July 15, 2014:
External detailed and low frequency eddy current inspections of the
upper and lower skin panels for cracking, external detailed and HFEC
inspections of the doubler for cracking, and internal detailed and
HFEC inspections of the upper and lower skin panels for cracking
(for airplanes with a stringer 6 lap joint modification installed
between STA 340 and STA 400 as specified in Boeing Service Bulletin
747-53-2272); or internal detailed and surface HFEC inspections for
any crack in the skin or internal doubler (for airplanes with lap
joints modified as specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2499.)
    (3) For airplanes identified as Groups 1, 7, and 12 through 18
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2499, Revision 3, dated July
15, 2014: Internal detailed and surface HFEC inspections for any
crack in the skin or internal doubler.

(j) Exceptions to Service Bulletin Procedures

    (1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2499, Revision 3,
dated July 15, 2014, specifies a compliance time ``after the
Revision 3 date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires
compliance within the specified

compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2499, Revision 3,
dated July 15, 2014, specifies to contact Boeing for repair
instructions: Before further flight, repair using a method approved
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this
AD.

(k) Credit for Previous Actions

    Actions done before the effective date of this AD using the
service information identified in paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this
AD are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding requirements
of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.
    (1) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2499, Revision 1, dated
October 30, 2008, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
    (2) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2499, Revision 2, dated
August 12, 2010, which was incorporated by reference in AD 2010-26-
10, Amendment 39-16549 (75 FR 81427, December 28, 2010).

(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (m)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must
meet the certification basis of the airplane and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) AMOCs approved for AD 2010-26-10, Amendment 39-16549 (75 FR
81427, December 28, 2010), are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of paragraphs (g) and (h) this AD.

(m) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Nathan Weigand,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (n)(3) and (n)(4) of this AD.

(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2499, Revision 3, dated
July 15, 2014.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 7, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-03219 Filed 2-17-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 79 (Monday, April 27, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18995-18997]
[FR Doc No: E9-9436]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0502; FRL-8783-5]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South
Coast Air Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions were proposed in the Federal
Register on July 30, 2008 and concern oxides of nitrogen (NOx)
emissions from gaseous- and liquid-fueled internal combustion engines.
We are approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources
under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on May 27, 2009.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0502 for
this action. The index to the docket is available electronically at
http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment
during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Francisco D[oacute][ntilde]ez, EPA
Region IX,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On July 30, 2008 (73 FR 44204), EPA proposed to approve the
following rule into the California SIP.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Local agency                  Rule No.            Rule title             Adopted        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCAQMD................................          1110.2  Gaseous- and Liquid-            02/01/08        05/20/08
                                                         Fueled Internal
                                                         Combustion Engines.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it
complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rule and our evaluation.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received comments from the following parties.
    1. Charles Humphrey, Jr., Sempra Energy Utilities (SEU); letter
dated August 29, 2008 and received August 29, 2008.
    2. B. Sachau; e-mail message dated July 30, 2008 and received July
30, 2008.
    3. U.S. Citizen (anonymous); web comment submitted July 31, 2008.
    The comments and our responses are summarized below.
    Comment #1: Rule 1110.2, subsection (f)(1)(G), requires that
portable analyzers be operated only by persons appropriately trained
and certified by the District. However, as of the date of the letter,
the District had not initiated training or certification programs for
this purpose. If operators are unable to obtain this required training
in a timely manner, they may be prevented, through no fault of their
own, from certifying compliance by the end of the reporting year as the
rule requires. (SEU)
    Response #1: This comment more regards how Rule 1110.2 is
implemented in the near term rather than the requirements of the rule.
The commenter does not dispute those rule requirements. EPA's proposal
to approve Rule 1110.2 into the California SIP is based on the rule's
requirements as written, which fulfill the relevant CAA criteria for
SIP approval. EPA contacted SCAQMD regarding this question in early
October. The District informed us at that time that some training
sessions had already been scheduled. For further questions, EPA
recommends contacting SCAQMD directly, or referring to the District's
rule support documents at http://www.aqmd.gov/rules/support.html. See
also response 3.
    Comment #2: Rule 1110.2, subsection (f)(1)(C), requires that source
testing shall be conducted in accordance with a District-approved
source test protocol. However, as of the comment letter date the
District had yet to issue written approval of the source test protocols
that SEU submitted for its engines. Therefore, SEU may not be able to
perform the required source tests before the Rule 1110.2 deadline,
putting the affected engines at risk of violating the rule. (SEU)
    Response #2: In a conversation in early October, SCAQMD assured us
that if for some reason the District is unable to act on the submitted
source test protocols in a timely manner, they would extend the
relevant deadlines. Also see Response 1 and Response
3.
    Comment #3: By being constrained from fulfilling certain rule
requirements in a timely manner (as in Comments 1 and
2 above), Title V facilities with engines regulated by Rule
1110.2 risk not being able to certify compliance for the period ending
December 31, 2008. This problem could have significant repercussions
for facilities, including leaving them susceptible to citizen lawsuits
alleging violations of their Title V permits. Similarly, affected
companies may not be able to provide a New Source Review (NSR)
certification for a given Title V facility. We request that EPA
consider these Title V compliance issues if amended Rule 1110.2 becomes
SIP-approved. (SEU)
    Response #3: EPA acknowledges this concern and recognizes that
sources may depend on District action in order to fully comply with the
rule. Although these rule implementation issues do not affect our
decision to approve Rule 1110.2, we are willing to work with SCAQMD to
reasonably resolve concerns with related Title V permitting
requirements.
    The other comments received did not relate to our proposal to
approve Rule 1110.2, and are therefore not addressed here.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted that change our assessment that the
submitted rule complies with the relevant CAA requirements. Therefore,
as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving
this rule into the California SIP.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in

the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days
after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 26, 2009. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: March 2, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

0
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding and reserving paragraph (c)(359)
and by adding paragraph (c)(360) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (359) [Reserved]
    (360) New and amended regulations were submitted on May 20, 2008 by
the Governor's designee.
    (i) Incorporation by Reference.
    (A) South Coast Air Quality Management District
    (1) Rule 1110.2, ``Gaseous- and Liquid-Fueled Internal Combustion
Engines, adopted on August 3, 1990 and amended February 1, 2008.

[FR Doc. E9-9436 Filed 4-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 3 (Friday, January 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 753-755]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31653]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2012-0003; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1286]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Title
44, Part 65 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR part 65). The
LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to calculate
appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and the
contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will become effective on the
dates listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS
report in effect prior to this determination for the listed
communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has ninety (90)
days in which to request through the community that the Deputy
Associate Administrator for Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at

www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Chief executive                       Online location of
        State and county           Location and case      officer of         Community map       Letter of Map        Effective date of       Community
                                          No.              community          repository           Revision              modification            No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona:
    Yavapai.....................  City of Prescott    The Honorable       Public Works        http://             March 11, 2013...........       040098
                                   (12-09-1886P).      Marlin              Department, 201     www.r9map.org/
                                                       Kuykendall,         South Cortez        Docs/12-09-1886P-
                                                       Mayor, City of      Street, Prescott,   040098-102IAC.pdf.
                                                       Prescott, 201       AZ 86303.
                                                       South Cortez
                                                       Street, Prescott,
                                                       AZ 86303.
    Yavapai.....................  City of Prescott    The Honorable       Engineering         http://             March 11, 2013...........       040121
                                   Valley (12-09-      Harvey C. Skoog,    Division, 7501      www.r9map.org/
                                   1886P).             Mayor, Town of      East Civic          Docs/12-09-1886P-
                                                       Prescott Valley,    Circle, Prescott    040121-102IAC.pdf.
                                                       7501 East Civic     Valley, AZ 86314.
                                                       Circle, Prescott
                                                       Valley, AZ 86314.
    Yavapai.....................  Unincorporated      The Honorable       Yavapai County      http://             March 11, 2013...........       040093
                                   areas of Yavapai    Thomas Thurman,     Flood Control       www.r9map.org/
                                   County (12-09-      Chairman, Yavapai   District, 500       Docs/12-09-1886P-
                                   1886P).             County Board of     South Marina        040093-102IAC.pdf.
                                                       Supervisors, 1015   Street, Prescott,
                                                       Fair Street,        AZ 86303.
                                                       Prescott, AZ
                                                       86305.
California:
    Mendocino...................  City of Ukiah (12-  The Honorable Mary  Planning and        http://             February 28, 2013........       060186
                                   09-2827P).          Anne Landis,        Community           www.r9map.org/
                                                       Mayor, City of      Development         Docs/12-09-2827P-
                                                       Ukiah, 300          Department, 300     060186-102IAC.pdf.
                                                       Seminary Avenue,    Seminary Avenue,
                                                       Ukiah, CA 95482.    Ukiah, CA 95482.
    San Bernardino..............  Town of Apple       The Honorable Barb  Engineering         http://             March 11, 2013...........       060752
                                   Valley (12-09-      Stanton, Mayor,     Department, 14955   www.r9map.org/
                                   1907P).             Town of Apple       Dale Evans          Docs/12-09-1907P-
                                                       Valley, 14955       Parkway, Apple      060752-102DA.pdf.
                                                       Dale Evans          Valley, CA 92307.
                                                       Parkway, Apple
                                                       Valley, CA 92307.
    San Diego...................  City of San Marcos  The Honorable Jim   Public Works        http://             March 7, 2013............       060296
                                   (12-09-1029P).      Desmond, Mayor,     Department, 1       www.r9map.org/
                                                       City of San         Civic Center        Docs/12-09-1029P-
                                                       Marcos, 1 Civic     Drive, San          060296-102IAC.pdf.
                                                       Center Drive, San   Marcos, CA 92069.
                                                       Marcos, CA 92069.
    San Mateo...................  City of San Mateo   The Honorable       Community           http://             March 4, 2013............       060328
                                   (12-09-2887P).      Brandt Grotte,      Development         www.r9map.org/
                                                       Mayor, City of      Department, 330     Docs/12-09-2887P-
                                                       San Mateo, 330      West 20th Avenue,   060328-102DA.pdf.
                                                       West 20th Avenue,   San Mateo, CA
                                                       San Mateo, CA       94403.
                                                       94403.
Colorado:
    Larimer.....................  City of Fort        The Honorable       Stormwater          http://             February 28, 2013........       080102
                                   Collins (12-08-     Karen Weitkunat,    Utilities           www.bakeraecom.co
                                   0677P).             Mayor, City of      Department, 700     m/index.php/
                                                       Fort Collins,       Wood Street, Fort   colorado/larimer/.
                                                       P.O. Box 580,       Collins, CO 80521.
                                                       Fort Collins, CO
                                                       80521.
    Larimer.....................  Unincorporated      The Honorable Lew   Larimer County      http://             February 28, 2013........       080101
                                   areas of Larimer    Gaiter III,         Engineering         www.bakeraecom.co
                                   County (12-08-      Chairman, Larimer   Department, 200     m/index.php/
                                   0677P).             County Board of     West Oak Street,    colorado/larimer/.
                                                       Commissioners,      Fort Collins, CO
                                                       P.O. Box 1190,      80521.
                                                       Fort Collins, CO
                                                       80522.
Florida:
    Broward.....................  City of Hallandale  The Honorable Joy   Development         http://             February 28, 2013........       125110
                                   Beach (12-04-       Cooper, Mayor,      Services, 2600      www.bakeraecom.co
                                   5196P).             City of             Hollywood           m/index.php/
                                                       Hallandale Beach,   Boulevard,          florida/broward/.
                                                       400 South Federal   Hallandale Beach,
                                                       Highway,            FL 33009.
                                                       Hallandale Beach,
                                                       FL 33009.

    Lee.........................  Unincorporated      The Honorable John  Lee County          http://             February 28, 2013........       125124
                                   areas of Lee        E. Manning,         Community           www.bakeraecom.co
                                   County (12-04-      Chairman, Lee       Development         m/index.php/
                                   2790P).             County Board of     Department, 1500    florida/lee-5/.
                                                       Commissioners,      Monroe Street,
                                                       P.O. Box 398,       2nd Floor, Fort
                                                       Fort Myers, FL      Myers, FL 33901.
                                                       33902.
    Miami-Dade..................  City of Sunny       The Honorable       Building and        http://             March 11, 2013...........       120688
                                   Isles Beach (12-    Norman S.           Development         www.bakeraecom.co
                                   04-6055P).          Edelcup, Mayor,     Department, 18070   m/index.php/
                                                       City of Sunny       Collins Avenue,     florida/miami-
                                                       Isles Beach,        Sunny Isles         dade/.
                                                       18070 Collins       Beach, FL 33610.
                                                       Avenue, Sunny
                                                       Isles Beach, FL
                                                       33160.
    Monroe......................  Unincorporated      The Honorable       Monroe County       http://             February 18, 2013........       125129
                                   Areas of Monroe     David Rice,         Building            www.bakeraecom.co
                                   County (12-04-      Mayor, Monroe       Department, 2798    m/index.php/
                                   5100P).             County, Marathon    Overseas Highway,   florida/monroe-3/.
                                                       Airport Terminal,   Suite 330,
                                                       9400 Overseas       Marathon, FL
                                                       Highway, Suite      33050.
                                                       210, Marathon, FL
                                                       33050.
    Monroe......................  Unincorporated      The Honorable       Monroe County       http://             February 4, 2013.........       125129
                                   Areas of Monroe     David Rice,         Building            www.bakeraecom.co
                                   County (12-04-      Mayor, Monroe       Department, 2798    m/index.php/
                                   6679P).             County, Marathon    Overseas Highway,   florida/monroe-3/.
                                                       Airport Terminal,   Suite 330,
                                                       9400 Overseas       Marathon, FL
                                                       Highway, Suite      33050.
                                                       210, Marathon, FL
                                                       33050.
    Orange......................  City of Orlando     The Honorable       Permitting          http://             March 8, 2013............       120186
                                   (12-04-5845P).      Buddy Dyer Mayor,   Services, 400       www.bakeraecom.co
                                                       City of Orlando,    South Orange        m/index.php/
                                                       P.O. Box 4990,      Avenue, Orlando,    florida/orange-2/.
                                                       Orlando, FL 32808.  FL 32801.
Hawaii: Hawaii..................  Unincorporated      The Honorable       Hawaii County       http://             March 4, 2013............       155166
                                   Areas of Hawaii     William P. Kenoi,   Office Building,    www.r9map.org/
                                   County (12-09-      Mayor, Hawaii       Department of       Docs/12-09-1607P-
                                   1607P).             County, 25 Aupuni   Public Works, 101   155166-102IAC.pdf.
                                                       Street, Suite       Pauahi Street,
                                                       2603, Hilo, HI      Suite 7, Hilo, HI
                                                       96720.              96720.
Utah: Washington................  City of St. George  The Honorable       Engineering         http://             February 25, 2013........       490177
                                   (12-08-0643P).      Daniel D.           Department, 175     www.bakeraecom.co
                                                       McArthur, Mayor,    East 200 North,     m/index.php/utah/
                                                       City of St.         St. George, UT      washington-4/.
                                                       George, 175 East    84770.
                                                       200 North, St.
                                                       George, UT 84770.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

James A. Walke,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of
Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2012-31653 Filed 1-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P