[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58132-58133]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23092]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9729-7]

Public Water System Supervision Program Revision for the State of
Colorado

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the provisions of Section 1413 of the Safe
Drinking Water Act (SDWA), 42 U.S.C. 300g-2, public notice is hereby
given that the state of Colorado has revised its Public Water System
Supervision (PWSS) Program by adopting regulations for the Long Term 2
Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule and the Stage 2 Disinfectants and
Disinfection Byproducts Rule that correspond to the National Primary
Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWR). The EPA has completed its review of
this revision in accordance with the SDWA and proposes to approve
Colorado's primacy revision for the Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule and the Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection
Byproducts Rule.
    Today's approval action does not extend to public water systems in
Indian country as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Please see Supplementary
Information, Item B.

DATES: Any member of the public is invited to submit written comments
and/or request a public hearing on this determination by [insert date
30 days after publication in the Federal Register]. Please see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, Item C, for details. Should no timely and
appropriate request for a hearing be received, and the Regional
Administrator (RA) does not elect to hold a hearing on his own motion,
this determination shall become effective October 19, 2012. If a public
hearing is requested and granted, then this determination shall not
become effective until such time following the hearing as the RA issues
an order affirming or rescinding this action.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and requests for a public hearing should be
addressed to: James B. Martin, Regional Administrator, c/o Robert
Clement, Drinking Water Unit (8P-W-DW), U.S. EPA, Region 8, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO 80202-1129.
    All documents relating to this determination are available for
inspection at the following locations: (1) U.S. EPA, Region 8, Drinking
Water Unit (7th floor), 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO 80202-1129; (2)
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), Drinking
Water Section, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Clement, Drinking Water Unit
(8P-W-DW), U.S. EPA, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO 80202-
1129,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA approved Colorado's application for
assuming primary enforcement authority for the PWSS program, pursuant
to Section 1413 of the SDWA, 42 U.S.C. 300g-2, and 40 C.F.R. Part 142.
The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment administers
Colorado's PWSS program.

A. Why are revisions to State programs necessary?

    States with primary PWSS enforcement authority must comply with the
requirements of 40 C.F.R. Part 142 for maintaining primacy. They must
adopt regulations that are at least as stringent as the NPDWRs at 40
CFR Parts 141 and 142, as well as adopt all new and revised NPDWRs in
order to retain primacy (40 CFR 142.12(a)).

B. How does today's action affect Indian country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in
Colorado?

    Colorado is not authorized to carry out its PWSS program in Indian
country, as that term is defined at 18 U.S.C. 1151. Indian country
includes, but is not limited to, land within the formal Indian
Reservations located within or abutting the state of Colorado,
including the Southern Ute Indian Reservation and the Ute Mountain Ute
Indian Reservation, any land held in trust by the United States for an
Indian Tribe, and any other areas which are ``Indian country'' within
the meaning of 18 U.S.C. 1151.

C. Requesting a Hearing

    Any request for a public hearing shall include: (1) The name,
address, and telephone number of the individual, organization, or other
entity requesting a hearing; (2) a brief statement of the requester's
interest in the RA's determination and of information that he/she
intends to submit at such hearing; and (3) the signature of the
requester or responsible official, if made on behalf of an organization
or other entity.
    Notice of any hearing shall be given not less than fifteen (15)
days prior to the time scheduled for the hearing and will be made by
the RA in the Federal Register and in a newspaper of general
circulation in the state. A notice will also be sent to both the
person(s) requesting the hearing and the state. The hearing notice will
include a statement of purpose, information regarding time and
location, and the address and telephone number where interested persons
may obtain further information. The RA will issue a final determination
upon review of the hearing record.
    Frivolous or insubstantial requests for a hearing may be denied by
the RA. However, if a substantial request is made within thirty (30)
days after this notice, a public hearing will be held.
    Please bring this notice to the attention of any persons known by
you to have an interest in this determination.

    Dated: August 13, 2012.
James B. Martin,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2012-23092 Filed 9-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: July 24, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 141)]
[Notices]
[Page 36805-36807]
[DOCID:fr24jy09-156]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60337; File No. SR-BX-2009-038]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Extend a
Pilot Program That Allows for No Minimum Size Order Requirement for the
Price Improvement Period Process on the Boston Options Exchange
Facility

July 17, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 13, 2009 NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (the ``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Exchange filed the
proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act,\3\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective
upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the Supplementary Material to
Section 18 (the Price Improvement Period ``PIP'') of Chapter V of the
Rules of the Boston Options Exchange Group, LLC (``BOX'') to extend a
pilot program that permits BOX to have no minimum size requirement for
orders entered into the PIP and under certain circumstances permits the
premature termination of the PIP process (``PIP Pilot Program''). The
text of the proposed rule change is available from the principal office
of the Exchange, at the Commission's Public Reference Room and also on
the Exchange's Internet Web site at http://
nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXBX/Filings/.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to extend the PIP Pilot
Program under the BOX Rules for twelve (12) additional months. The PIP
Pilot Program allows BOX to have no minimum size requirement for orders
entered into the PIP process and under certain circumstances permits
the premature termination of the PIP process.\5\ The proposed rule
change reflects change to the text of Supplementary Material .01 to
Section 18 of Chapter V of the BOX Rules and seeks to extend the
operation of the PIP Pilot Program until July 17, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Pilot Program is currently set to expire on July 18,
2009. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58942 (November 13,
2008), 73 FR 70394 (November 20, 2008) (SR-BSE-2008-49); See also
Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 58195 (July 18, 2008), 73 FR
43801 (July 28, 2008) (SR-BSE-2008-39); See also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 55999 (July 2, 2007), 72 FR 37549 (July 10, 2007)
(SR-BSE-2007-27); See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54066
(June 29, 2006), 71 FR 38434 (July 6, 2006) (SR-BSE-2006-24); See
also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52149 (July 28, 2005), 70
FR 44704 (August 3, 2005) (SR-BSE-2005-22); See also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 49068 (January 13, 2004), 69 FR 2775
(January 20, 2004) (SR-BSE-2002-15) (``Original PIP Pilot Program
Approval Order''). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No.
51821 (June 10, 2005), 70 FR 35143 (June 16, 2005) (SR-BSE-2004-51)
(Order approving, among other things, under certain circumstances,
the premature termination of a PIP process).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that the PIP Pilot Program provides small
customer orders with benefits not available under the rules of some
other exchanges. One of the important factors of the PIP Pilot Program
is that it guarantees Participants the right to trade with their
customer orders that are less than 50 contracts. In particular, any
order

entered into the PIP is guaranteed an execution at the end of the
auction at a price at least equal to the national best bid or offer.
    In further support of this proposed rule change, and as required by
the Original PIP Pilot Program Approval Order, the Exchange represents
that BOX has been submitting to the Exchange and to the Commission a
PIP Pilot Program Report, offering detailed data from, and analysis of,
the PIP Pilot Program. Although BOX is submitting the reports, the
Exchange notes that it is also responsible for the timeliness and the
accuracy of the information.
    To aid the Commission in its evaluation of the PIP Pilot Program,
BOX has represented to the Exchange that BOX will provide the following
additional information each month: (1) The number of orders of 50
contracts or greater entered into the PIP auction; (2) The percentage
of all orders of 50 contracts or greater sent to BOX that are entered
into BOX's PIP auction; (3) The spread in the option, at the time an
order of 50 contracts or greater is submitted to the PIP auction; (4)
Of PIP trades for orders of fewer than 50 contracts, the percentage
done at the National Best Bid or Offer (``NBBO'') plus $.01, plus $.02,
plus $.03, etc.; (5) Of PIP trades for orders of 50 contracts or
greater, the percentage done at the NBBO plus $.01, plus $.02, plus
$.03, etc.; (6) The number of orders submitted by Order Flow Providers
(``OFPs'') when the spread was $.05, $.10, $.15, etc. For each spread,
BOX will specify the percentage of contracts in orders of fewer than 50
contracts submitted to BOX's PIP that were traded by: (a) The OFP that
submitted the order to the PIP; (b) BOX Market Makers assigned to the
class; (c) other BOX Participants; (d) Public Customer Orders
(including Customer PIP Orders (``CPOs'')); and (e) unrelated orders
(orders in standard increments entered during the PIP). For each
spread, BOX will also specify the percentage of contracts in orders of
50 contracts or greater submitted to BOX's PIP that were traded by: (a)
The OFP that submitted the order to the PIP; (b) BOX Market Makers
assigned to the class; (c) other BOX Participants; (d) Public Customer
Orders (including CPOs); and (e) unrelated orders (orders in standard
increments entered during PIP); (7) For the first Wednesday of each
month: (a) The total number of PIP auctions on that date; (b) the
number of PIP auctions where the order submitted to the PIP was fewer
than 50 contracts; (c) the number of PIP auctions where the order
submitted to the PIP was 50 contracts or greater; (d) the number of PIP
auctions (for orders of fewer than 50 contracts) with 0 participants
(excluding the initiating participant), 1 participant (excluding the
initiating participant), 2 participants (excluding the initiating
participant), 3 participants (excluding the initiating participant), 4
participants (excluding the initiating participant), etc., and (e) the
number of PIP auctions (for orders of 50 contracts or greater) with 0
participants (excluding the initiating participant), 1 participant
(excluding the initiating participant), 2 participants (excluding the
initiating participant), 3 participants (excluding the initiating
participant), 4 participants (excluding the initiating participant),
etc.; and (8) For the third Wednesday of each month: (a) The total
number of PIP auctions on that date; (b) the number of PIP auctions
where the order submitted to the PIP was fewer than 50 contracts; (c)
the number of PIP auctions where the order submitted to the PIP was 50
contracts or greater; (d) the number of PIP auctions (for orders of
fewer than 50 contracts) with 0 participants (excluding the initiating
participant), 1 participant (excluding the initiating participant), 2
participants (excluding the initiating participant), 3 participants
(excluding the initiating participant), 4 participants (excluding the
initiating participant), etc., and (e) the number of PIP auctions (for
orders of 50 contracts or greater) with 0 participants (excluding the
initiating participant), 1 participant (excluding the initiating
participant), 2 participants (excluding the initiating participant), 3
participants (excluding the initiating participant), 4 participants
(excluding the initiating participant), etc.
2. Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it is designed to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
The Exchange believes that the data demonstrates that there is
sufficient investor interest and demand to extend the PIP Pilot Program
for an additional twelve (12) months. The Exchange represents that the
Pilot Program is designed to provide investors with real and
significant price improvement regardless of the size of the order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change, as amended: (1) Does
not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition;
and (3) by its terms does not become operative for 30 days after the
date of this filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \8\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to provide the Commission
with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has fulfilled this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \10\ normally
may not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of filing.
However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \11\ permits the Commission to designate
a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The Exchange requests that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative delay, as specified in Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii),\12\ which would make the rule change operative upon
filing. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay
is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest
because such waiver will allow the PIP Pilot Program to continue
without interruption.\13\ Accordingly, the

Commission designates the proposed rule change operative upon filing
with the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Id.
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \12\ Id.
    \13\ For purposes only of waiving the operative delay for this
proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BX-2009-038 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2009-038. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the self-regulatory
organization. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-
2009-038 and should be submitted on or before August 14, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-17637 Filed 7-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 141 (Wednesday, July 23, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42708-42710]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17332]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0548; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-008-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of
comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposed airworthiness directive
(AD) for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-700-1A11 airplanes. The NPRM
proposed to require replacement of certain oxygen mask lanyards. The
NPRM was prompted by a report that certain lanyards for the passenger
oxygen masks are longer than the specified length, possibly leading to
inactive oxygen masks in an emergency. This action revises the NPRM by
proposing to require revised service information with corrected
instructions. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct lanyards
of incorrect length, which might not activate the flow of oxygen in an
emergency, resulting in injury to passengers. Since these actions
impose an additional burden over that proposed in the NPRM, we are
reopening the comment period to allow the public the chance to comment
on these proposed changes.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 8,
2014.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You
may review this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI), the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0548;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-008-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that
would apply to certain Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-700-1A11 airplanes.
The NPRM published in the Federal Register on July 18, 2013 (78 FR
42893). The NPRM proposed to require replacement of certain oxygen mask
lanyards.

Actions Since Previous NPRM Was Issued

    Since we issued the NPRM (78 FR 42893, July 18, 2013), the airplane
manufacturer found that the service information cited in the NPRM had
information that caused some airplanes to not be corrected. Also, we
have identified an additional Supplemental Type Certificate that is
affected by the identified unsafe condition.
    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2012-31R1, dated September 17, 2013 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for the specified products, because the
previous MCAI referred to the faulty service information. The MCAI
states:

    The aeroplane manufacturer has determined that the Oxygen
Dispensing Unit (ODU) lanyards, in several locations throughout the
aeroplane cabin, are excessively long. In an emergency situation
where oxygen is required, it is possible that certain occupants may
put their oxygen mask on without automatically activating the oxygen
flow which could result in a fatal injury.
    The original issue of this [TCCA] AD mandated the replacement of
the existing ODU lanyards with lanyards of the correct length.
    After the issuance of the original [TCCA] AD, the aeroplane
manufacturer discovered that operators had not replaced all of the
affected ODU lanyards due to misinterpretation of the accomplishment
instructions of the Basic Issue of SB 700-1A11-35-009. Revision 1 of
this [TCCA] AD is issued to mandate the incorporation of the revised
SB with clarified accomplishment instructions.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0548-0002.

Relevant Service Information

    Bombardier, Inc. has issued Service Bulletin 700-1A11-35-009,
Revision 02, dated May 28, 2013. The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to comment on the NPRM (78 FR
42893, July 18, 2013). We received no comments on the NPRM or on the
determination of the cost to the public.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another

country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
    Certain changes described above expand the scope of the NPRM (78 FR
42893, July 18, 2013). As a result, we have determined that it is
necessary to reopen the comment period to provide additional
opportunity for the public to comment on this proposed AD.

``Contacting the Manufacturer'' Paragraph in This Proposed AD

    Since late 2006, we have included a standard paragraph titled
``Airworthy Product'' in all MCAI ADs in which the FAA develops an AD
based on a foreign authority's AD.
    The MCAI or referenced service information in an FAA AD often
directs the owner/operator to contact the manufacturer for corrective
actions, such as a repair. Briefly, the Airworthy Product paragraph
allowed owners/operators to use corrective actions provided by the
manufacturer if those actions were FAA-approved. In addition, the
paragraph stated that any actions approved by the State of Design
Authority (or its delegated agent) are considered to be FAA-approved.
    In another NPRM, Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-101-AD (78 FR
78285, December 26, 2013), we proposed to prevent the use of repairs
that were not specifically developed to correct the unsafe condition,
by requiring that the repair approval provided by the State of Design
Authority or its delegated agent specifically refer to the FAA AD. This
change was intended to clarify the method of compliance and to provide
operators with better visibility of repairs that are specifically
developed and approved to correct the unsafe condition. In addition, we
proposed to change the phrase ``its delegated agent'' to include a
design approval holder (DAH) with State of Design Authority design
organization approval (DOA), as applicable, to refer to a DAH
authorized to approve required repairs for the proposed AD.
    One commenter to the other NPRM, Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-
101-AD (78 FR 78285, December 26, 2013), stated the following: ``The
proposed wording, being specific to repairs, eliminates the
interpretation that Airbus messages are acceptable for approving minor
deviations (corrective actions) needed during accomplishment of an AD
mandated Airbus service bulletin.''
    This comment has made the FAA aware that some operators have
misunderstood or misinterpreted the Airworthy Product paragraph to
allow the owner/operator to use messages provided by the manufacturer
as approval of deviations during the accomplishment of an AD-mandated
action. The Airworthy Product paragraph does not approve messages or
other information provided by the manufacturer for deviations to the
requirements of the AD-mandated actions. The Airworthy Product
paragraph only addresses the requirement to contact the manufacturer
for corrective actions for the identified unsafe condition and does not
cover deviations from other AD requirements. However, deviations to AD-
required actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17, and anyone may request
the approval for an alternative method of compliance to the AD-required
actions using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    To address this misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the
Airworthy Product paragraph, we have changed that paragraph and
retitled it ``Contacting the Manufacturer.'' This paragraph now
clarifies that for any requirement in this proposed AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished
using a method approved by the FAA, TCCA, or Bombardier's TCCA Design
Approval Organization (DAO). Where necessary throughout this proposed
AD, we also replaced any reference to approvals of corrective actions
with a reference to the Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph.
    The Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph also clarifies that, if
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature. The DAO signature indicates that the data and information
contained in the document are TCCA-approved, which is also FAA-
approved. Messages and other information provided by the manufacturer
that do not contain the DAO-authorized signature approval are not TCCA-
approved, unless TCCA directly approves the manufacturer's message or
other information.
    This clarification does not remove flexibility previously afforded
by the Airworthy Product paragraph. Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never intended for required actions. This
is also consistent with the recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by identifying those actions in
manufacturers' service instructions that are ``Required for
Compliance'' with ADs. We continue to work with manufacturers to
implement this recommendation. But once we determine that an action is
required, any deviation from the requirement must be approved as an
alternative method of compliance.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 22 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 16 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost
about $0 per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $29,920, or $1,360 per
product.
    Where the service information lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge
for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This proposed regulation is
within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in
this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2013-0548; Directorate Identifier
2013-NM-008-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by September 8, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-700-1A11 airplanes,
certificated in any category, modified by FAA Supplemental Type
Certificate (STC) ST02140NY, issued October 14, 2005 (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/6B8CF26D01F5E6DE862570C7006DCD7E?OpenDocument&Highlight=st02140ny)
and to airplanes, certificated in any category, modified by FAA STC
ST02033NY, issued December 2, 2004 (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/99FF781E0BD20AD886256FA300558250?OpenDocument&Highlight=02033).

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35, Oxygen.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report that certain lanyards for the
passenger oxygen masks are longer than the specified length,
possibly leading to inactive oxygen masks in an emergency. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct lanyards of incorrect length,
which might not activate the flow of oxygen in an emergency,
resulting in injury to passengers.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Replacement

    Within 750 flight hours or 15 months after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs first: Replace lanyards having part
numbers (PN) B431564-503 and -505 for all passenger oxygen
dispensing units, with lanyards having PN B431564-507, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
700-1A11-35-009, Revision 02, dated May 28, 2013.

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO,
ANE-170, Engine and Propeller Directorate, FAA; or Transport Canada
Civil Aviation (TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must
include the DAO-authorized signature.

(i) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2012-31, dated December
7, 2012, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating it in Docket No. FAA-2013-0548.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You may review this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 15, 2014.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-17332 Filed 7-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: March 10, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 45)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 10195-10197]
[DOCID:fr10mr09-16]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0218; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-006-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Piper Aircraft, Inc. PA-23, PA-31, and
PA-42 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Piper Aircraft, Inc. (Piper) PA-23 series airplanes and all PA-
31 and PA-42 series airplanes. This proposed AD would establish life
limits for safety-critical nose baggage door components. This proposed
AD would also require you to replace those safety-critical nose baggage
door components and repetitively inspect and lubricate the nose baggage
door latching mechanism and lock assembly. This proposed AD results
from several incidents and accidents, including fatal accidents, where
the nose baggage door opening in flight was listed as a causal factor.
We are proposing this AD to detect and correct worn, corroded, or non-
conforming nose baggage door components, which could result in the nose
baggage door opening in flight. The door opening in flight could
significantly affect the handling and performance of the aircraft. It
could also allow baggage to be ejected from the nose baggage
compartment and strike the propeller. This failure could lead to loss
of control.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 11, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Piper Aircraft, Inc., 2926 Piper Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet: http://
www.newpiper.com/company/publications.asp.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory K. Noles, Aerospace Engineer,
One Crown Center, 1895 Phoenix Blvd., Suite 450, Atlanta, Georgia
30349; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number, ``FAA-
2009-0218; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-006-AD'' at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall
regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed
AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may
amend the proposed AD in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive concerning this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On January 5, 2008, a Piper PA-31-350 airplane crashed shortly
after takeoff. The National Transportation Safety Board preliminary
report of the fatal accident indicates the nose baggage door opened in
flight. Our investigation of the accident indicates the nose baggage
door opening in flight was a causal factor in the accident. The
investigation also indicated that the baggage door did not conform to
the type design and was not in a condition for safe operation. We have
also received several other incident and accident reports where the
nose baggage door opening in flight was listed as a causal factor.
    Our investigation of PA-31 airplanes has found additional
nonconforming nose baggage door components. Examples of problems
discovered are: key locks that have been replaced with locks that allow
the key to be removed when the door is unlocked; bent, corroded, worn,
or broken parts; parts installed backwards; inoperative warning
systems; and installation of secondary latches that are not strong
enough to secure the door in a closed position.
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in the nose baggage
door opening in flight. The door opening in flight could significantly
affect the handling and performance of the aircraft. It could also
allow baggage to be ejected from the nose baggage compartment and
strike the propeller. This failure could lead to loss of control.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed Piper Aircraft, Inc. Service Bulletin No. 1194A,
dated November 10, 2008.
    The service information describes procedures for:
     Repetitive inspection of the nose baggage door latching
mechanism and lock assembly and replacement of life limited parts as
identified in the service bulletin; and
     Repetitive lubrication and inspection of the nose baggage
door latching and locking components.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all information and
determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist
or develop on other products of the same type design. This proposed AD
would require you to replace safety-critical nose baggage door
components and repetitively inspect and lubricate the nose baggage door
latching mechanism and lock assembly. This proposed AD would also
establish life limits for

safety-critical nose baggage door components.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information

    The applicability of this AD is expanded to include Models PA-23,
PA-23-160, and PA-23-235 airplanes that have a nose baggage door
installed. These models were not manufactured with a nose baggage door
and are not included in Piper Aircraft, Inc. Service Bulletin No.
1194A, dated November 10, 2008. However there are PA-23, PA-23-160, and
PA-23-235 airplanes in service that may have been modified with the
applicable nose baggage door installed. The requirements of this
proposed AD, if adopted as a final rule, would take precedence over the
provisions in the service information.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 8,000 airplanes in
the U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to do the proposed inspection and
parts replacement:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Total cost per   Total cost on
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        airplane      U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 work-hours x $80 per hour = $320...........................            $190             $510       $4,080,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket that contains the proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>)
is located at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Piper Aircraft, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2009-0218; Directorate
Identifier 2009-CE-006-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) action by May 11, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Models PA-23, PA-23-160, PA-23-235, PA-
23-250, PA-23-250 (Navy UO-1), PA-31, PA-31-300, PA-31-325, PA-31-
350, PA-31P, PA-31P-350, PA-31T, PA-31T1, PA-31T2, PA-31T3, PA-42,
PA-42-720, PA-42-1000, and PA-E23-250 airplanes, all serial numbers,
that are:
    (1) Certificated in any category; and
    (2) Equipped with a baggage door in the fuselage nose section (a
nose baggage door).

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from several incidents and accidents,
including some fatal accidents, where the nose baggage door opening
in flight was listed as a causal factor. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct worn, corroded, or non-conforming nose baggage
door components, which could result in the nose baggage door opening
in flight. The door opening in flight could significantly affect the
handling and performance of the aircraft. It could also allow
baggage to be ejected from the nose baggage compartment and strike
the propeller. This failure could lead to loss of control.

Compliance

    (e) To address this problem, you must do the following, unless
already done:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Actions                  Compliance              Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) For all aircraft:      (A) Initially: Within     Follow
(i) Inspect the nose        1,000 hours time-in-      INSTRUCTIONS: PART
 baggage door assembly      service (TIS) since all   I of Piper
 for damaged, worn, or      life-limited components   Aircraft, Inc.
 corroded components;       were installed new        Service Bulletin
(ii) Replace life-limited   following Piper           No. 1194A, dated
 components specified in    Aircraft, Inc. Service    November 10, 2008.
 the service information;   Bulletin No. 1194A,
 and                        dated November 10,
(iii) Install or inspect,   2008, or within the
 as applicable, the nose    next 100 hours TIS
 baggage placard            after the effective
 following the service      date of this AD,
 information.               whichever occurs later;
                            and
                           (B) Repetitively
                            thereafter: At
                            intervals not to exceed
                            1,000 hours TIS.
(2) For all aircraft:      (A) Initially: Within     Follow
(i) Lubricate and inspect   100 hours TIS after the   INSTRUCTIONS: PART
 all nose baggage door      effective date of this    II of Piper
 latching and locking       AD; and                   Aircraft, Inc.
 components for damaged,   (B) Repetitively           Service Bulletin
 worn, or corroded          thereafter: At            No. 1194A, dated
 components; and            intervals not to exceed   November 10, 2008.
(ii) Verify the key can     100 hours TIS.
 only be removed from the
 lock assembly in the
 locked position in
 accordance with the
 service instructions.
(3) For all aircraft with  Before further flight     Follow Piper
 damaged, worn, or          after any inspection      Aircraft, Inc.
 corroded components:       required in paragraphs    Service Bulletin
 Repair/replace any         (e)(1) and (e)(2) of      No. 1194A, dated
 damaged, worn, or          this AD where any         November 10, 2008.
 corroded components.       evidence of damaged,
                            worn, or corroded
                            components was found.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (f) The Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
Attn: Gregory K. Noles, Aerospace Engineer, One Crown Center, 1895
Phoenix Blvd., Suite 450, Atlanta, Georgia 30349; telephone: (770)
703-6085; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

Related Information

    (g) To get copies of the service information referenced in this
AD, contact Piper Aircraft, Inc., 2926 Piper Drive, Vero Beach,
Florida 32960; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
Internet: http://www.newpiper.com/company/publications.asp. To view
the AD docket, go to U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 3, 2009.
David R. Showers,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E9-4987 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 192 (Friday, October 2, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62295-62296]
[FR Doc No: 2020-21831]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Number: PR20-73-000.
    Applicants: DTE Gas Company.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: DTE Gas Operating
Statement Update to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/23/2020.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>44.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/14/2020.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1208-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 092420 Negotiated Rates--
Castleton Commodities Merchant Trading L.P. R-4010-24 to be effective
11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/24/20.
    Accession Number: 20200924-5023.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1209-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 092420 Negotiated Rates--
Citadel Energy Marketing LLC R-7705-02 to be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/24/20.
    Accession Number: 20200924-5024.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1210-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 092420 Negotiated Rates--
Citadel Energy Marketing LLC R-7705-03 to be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/24/20.
    Accession Number: 20200924-5033.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1211-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 092420 Negotiated Rates--DTE
Energy Trading, Inc. R-1830-14 to be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/24/20.
    Accession Number: 20200924-5038.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1212-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 092420 Negotiated Rates--
Mercuria Energy America, LLC R-7540-02 to be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/24/20.
    Accession Number: 20200924-5041.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1213-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cover Page Contact
Information- Address Change to be effective 9/28/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/24/20.
    Accession Number: 20200924-5052.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1214-000.
    Applicants: Enable Mississippi River Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 2020 MRT Annual Fuel Filing to
be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/24/20.
    Accession Number: 20200924-5131.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1215-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing AGT 2020 OFO Penalty Disbursement
Report.
    Filed Date: 9/24/20.
    Accession Number: 20200924-5138.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1216-000.
    Applicants: Enable Mississippi River Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Annual Penalty Revenue Credit Report of Enable
Mississippi River Transmission, LLC under RP20-1216.
    Filed Date: 9/24/20.
    Accession Number: 20200924-5146.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1217-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Rate Schedule SS-2 Tracker
Filing eff September 1, 2020 and October 1, 2020 to be effective 9/1/
2020.
    Filed Date: 9/25/20.
    Accession Number: 20200925-5006.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1218-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: SENA Negotiated Rate Agreement
to be effective 11/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/25/20.
    Accession Number: 20200925-5011.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1219-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Non-conforming Agmt Filing
(FPL 52990) to be effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/25/20.
    Accession Number: 20200925-5018.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1221-000.
    Applicants: Trunkline Gas Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Annual Report of Flow Through filed
9-25-20.
    Filed Date: 9/25/20.
    Accession Number: 20200925-5052.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1224-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Chevron
911109 Releases eff 10-01-2020 to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/25/20.
    Accession Number: 20200925-5084.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/7/20.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 28, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-21831 Filed 10-1-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76314-76315]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31122]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-68490; File No. SR-CME-2012-46]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the Fee Schedule Applicable to its OTC Credit Default Swap
Clearing Offering

December 20, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 18, 2012, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (``CME'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared primarily by CME. CME
filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) \3\
of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \4\ thereunder so that the proposal was
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the
Proposed Rule Change

    CME is proposing to amend the fee schedule that currently applies
to its OTC Credit Default Swap clearing offering. The text of the
proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's Web site at http://www.cmegroup.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the clearing agency included
statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule
change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule
change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places
specified in Item IV below. The clearing agency has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections (A), (B) and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.

(A) Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change

    This filing proposes to make minor amendments to the current fee
schedule that applies to CDX North American Index Credit Default Swaps
cleared at CME. The only modification that is proposed is to extend the
current twenty five percent (25%) discount of base clearing fees for
all market participants that clear OTC North American Index CDS
products at CME for another year. This discount was scheduled to expire
as of December 31, 2012.
    The proposed changes are related to fees and therefore will become
effective immediately. However, the proposed fee changes will become
operative as of January 2, 2013. CME has also certified the proposed
rule changes that are the subject of this filing to the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC''), in CFTC Submission 12-464.
    The proposed CME rule amendments establish or change a member due,
fee, or other charge imposed by CME under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder.
CME believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and
regulations thereunder and, in particular, to 17A(b)(3)(D), in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among participants. The proposed changes apply to all
market participants clearing trades at CME. CME believes the
modifications should encourage firms to submit additional volume into
the system which should help ensure readiness and also help build open
interest ahead of a regulatory mandate. CME notes that it operates in a
highly competitive market in which market participants can readily
direct business to competing venues.

(B) Clearing Agency's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition.

(C) Clearing Agency's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change
Received From Members, Participants or Others

    CME has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, comments
regarding this proposed rule change. CME has not received any
unsolicited written comments from interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has been filed pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) \5\ of the Act and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 \6\
thereunder and became effective on filing. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml) or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CME-2012-46 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CME-2012-46. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of CME and on CME's
Web site (http://www.cmegroup.com).
    All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CME-2012-46
and should be submitted on or before January 17, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-31122 Filed 12-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P