Date Modified 5/ 25/ 2006 By: Abt Associates Inc. Data Sources: Economic Census CD, Annual Survey of Manufactures Description: Data for profile Purpose: Census Data and ASM Data for manufacturing profile The original version of this file contains, or is linked to a file that contains, confidential business inform used to reveal CBI. As a result, the values for any variables determined by EPA to be CBI, or that cou replaced with dummy values. Such variables have been marked with light orange highlight. It should added to illustrate how the spreadsheets work; they may not always be consistent with other data provi observed patterns of the dummy values is for illustration purposes only and has no significance with re be noted that any information that uses the dummy values will not show the true results of EPA's analy Many of the spreadsheets in this part of the docket are linked to other spreadsheets so that the user ca analysis. When opening such a linked spreadsheet, click " No" at the initial message box to avoid dela Also, in some cases, a formula may exhibit a value of "# VALUE!". In this case, open the spreadsheet information to reestablish the broken link. If the user wishes to replace the existing data with their own other linked spreadsheets need to be opened for the change to take effect throughout the analysis. To given spreadsheet, go to Edit | Links. rmation ( CBI), or information that could be ould be used to reveal CBI, have been ld be noted that the dummy values have been ovided for the same model facility. Any respect to the original values. It should also alysis.

can follow the flow of data through the lays while the spreadsheet tries to update. et from which the cell in question pulls its wn data to see the effect of such changes, To see a list of all spreadsheets linked to a Source: U. S. DOC. 1997 Economic Census Bridge Between NAICS and SIC, 2002 Economic Census 2002 Data SIC Code SIC Description NAICS Code NAICS Description # of Establishments Sales, Shipments, or Receipts ($ 000) 2911 Petroleum Refining 324110 Petroleum refineries 203 193,547,214 # of Employees 61,585 Source: Table 5.8 Refinery Input and Output, Selected Years, 1949 2004 Annual Energy Review 2004 Year Motor Gasoline Distillate Fuel Oil Jet Fuel Residual Fuel Oil Other Productsa Total Output Percent Change 1990 6.96 2.93 1.49 0.95 0.78 15.27 1991 6.98 2.96 1.44 0.93 0.76 15.26  0.1% 1992 7.06 2.97 1.4 0.89 0.8 15.4 0.9% 1993 7.3 3.13 1.42 0.84 0.78 15.79 2.5% 1994 7.18 3.2 1.45 0.83 0.79 15.79 0.0% 1995 7.46 3.16 1.42 0.79 0.78 15.99 1.3% 1996 7.57 3.32 1.52 0.73 0.76 16.32 2.1% 1997 7.74 3.39 1.55 0.71 0.84 16.76 2.7% 1998 7.89 3.42 1.53 0.76 0.89 17.03 1.6% 1999 7.93 3.4 1.57 0.7 0.84 16.99  0.2% 2000 7.95 3.58 1.61 0.7 0.79 17.24 1.5% 2001 8.02 3.7 1.53 0.72 0.73 17.29 0.3% 2002 8.18 3.59 1.51 0.6 0.77 17.27  0.1% 2003 8.19 3.71 1.5 0.66 0.78 17.49 1.3% 2004 8.23 3.82 1.55 0.65 0.83 17.77 1.6% 1990 2004 18.2% 30.4% 4.0%  31.6% 6.4% 16.4% AAGR 1.2% 1.9% 0.3%  2.7% 0.4% 1.1% Dollar values in millions, $ 2005 Year Value of Shipments Percent Change Year Value of Shipments 1987 181,027 n/ a 1987 1988 176,008  2.8% AAGR 1988 1989 187,227 6.4% 187,227 1989 1990 219,025 17.0% 219,025 1990 1991 193,023  11.9% 193,023 1991 1992 176,809  8.4% 176,809 1992 1993 164,853  6.8% 164,853 1993 1994 159,839  3.0% 159,839 1994 1995 165,743 3.7% 165,743 1995 1996 188,817 13.9% 188,817 1996 188,817 1997 186,428  1.3% 186,428 1997 186,428 1998 137,306  26.3% 137,306 1998 137,306 1999 165,289 20.4% 165,289 1999 165,289 2000 241,662 46.2% 241,662 2000 241,662 2001 218,854  9.4% 218,854 2001 218,854 2002 208,236  4.9% 208,236 2002 208,236 2003 235,916 13.3% 235,916 2003 235,916 2004 296,038 25.5% 296,038 2004 296,038 % Change 1987 2004 63.5% 3.10% AAGR 2.9% Petroleum Refineries ( NAICS 324110) Petroleum Refineries ( SIC 2911)

120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 300,000 320,000 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Petroleum Refineries ( NAICS 324110)

Petroleum Refineries ( SIC 2911) Dollar values in millions, $ 2005 Petroleum Refineries ( SIC 2911) Petroleum Refineries ( NAICS 32410)

Year Value Added % Change Year Value Added 1987 21,779 1987 1988 30,642 40.7% 1988 1989 30,797 0.5% 1989 1990 31,357 1.8% 1990 1991 26,281  16.2% 1991 1992 24,789  5.7% 1992 1993 23,734  4.3% 1993 1994 29,569 24.6% 1994 1995 29,185  1.3% 1995 1996 31,065 6.4% 1996 31,065 1997 36,281 16.8% 1997 36,281 1998 27,917  23.1% 1998 27,917 1999 36,103 29.3% 1999 36,103 2000 41,069 13.8% 2000 41,069 2001 44,145 7.5% 2001 44,145 2002 30,533  30.8% 2002 30,533 2003 41,240 35.1% 2003 41,240 2004 53,070 28.7% 2004 53,070 % Change 1987 2004 143.7% AAGR 5.4%

15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 55,000 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Petroleum Refineries ( NAICS 32410)

Petroleum Refineries ( SIC 2911) Record for the Proposed § 316( b) New Facility Rule 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Source: http:// stats. bls. gov/ ppihome. htm as of 2/ 2/ 2006 Year PPI 1987 68.6 1988 65.4 1989 73.6 1990 90.1 1991 80.9 1992 78.3 1993 75.2 1994 72.2 1995 74.5 1996 85.3 1997 83.1 1998 62.3 1999 73.6 2000 111.6 2001 103.1 2002 96.3 2003 121.2 2004 151.5 2005 205.5 * 2005 value is preliminary Series Id: PCU324110324110 Industry: Petroleum refineries Product: Petroleum refineries Base Date: 8506 Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual 1987 61.3 65 63.9 66.9 67.6 69.7 71.3 74 71.1 71.3 72.3 69 68.6 1988 65.1 65 63.4 66.1 68.4 67.1 67 67.4 64.3 62 64.9 64.4 65.4 1989 66.2 67 69.4 78.2 81.3 78.7 75.7 70.7 73.5 75.4 73.8 73.9 73.6 1990 85.9 79 76.5 78 78.2 76.7 75.1 89 104.2 116.9 116.3 105.3 90.1 1991 96.2 87 77.2 76.8 79.7 78.6 75.9 79.7 81.5 80.7 81.9 76.4 80.9 1992 70.1 72 71.8 75 80 84.1 82.5 81.7 82.7 82.9 81.1 75.2 78.3 1993 74.9 76 77.5 79 80.5 78.1 75.4 73.3 74.3 76.4 73.4 64.4 75.2 1994 64.3 68 67.8 69.2 70.8 72.1 75.7 80.5 77.3 73.6 75.4 70.7 72.2 1995 71.5 72 72.5 77.7 81.1 79.5 75.3 74.7 74.8 72.4 70.2 72.4 74.5 1996 76.7 75 79.2 88.6 91 85.2 84.1 84.7 87.9 90.2 90.7 90.7 85.3 1997 91.1 89 85 83.4 83.1 80.9 78.5 82.8 83.7 82.3 81 76.2 83.1 1998 70.4 66 61.5 64 66.6 64.1 63.1 59.4 60 61.5 59.1 51.6 62.3 1999 54 52 55.5 70.4 72.2 70.9 76.6 82.8 88 84.5 87.2 89.5 73.6 2000 91.8 103 109.9 103.9 107.5 119.2 114.6 111.3 124.8 121.2 121.2 111.6 111.6 2001 111.3 110 104.6 113.9 122 114.6 99.2 102.5 113.4 91.5 82.5 71.3 103.1 2002 73.3 75 85.9 98.3 97.2 96.3 98.8 101 108 116.6 105 100.2 96.3 2003 115.6 139 147.4 117.4 109.1 114.5 117 123.3 121.2 119.9 114 116.2 121.2 2004 131.6 131 134.6 142.9 153.9 145.2 154.1 157.7 161.3 180.7 173.5 151.6 151.5 2005 157.6 166 186.8 194 187.7 193.9 210.2 221.9 250 270.2( P) 214.4( P) 213.3( P) 205.5( P)

40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Petroleum Refineries ( NAICS 324110)

July 20, 2000 8 of 31 DCTM_ ARP. xls  PPI Raw Data Source: ' US90_ 98S. xls' SIC Desc 90_ TOTAL 91_ TOTAL 92_ TOTAL 2911 Firms 215 215 185 2911 Estab. 340 346 303 2911 Emp. 73,547 77,213 76,451 2911 Ann. Pay. 3,275,817 3,583,919 3,728,972 2911 Est. Rec. NA NA 139,949,023 Raw Data Source: ' SUSB by SIC 2002. xls' SIC codes 98_ Estab 99_ Estab 00_ Estab 01_ Estab 2911 304 292 298 302 Number of Firms and Facilities in the Petroleum Refining Industry Firms Facilities Year Number % change Number % change 1990 215 340 1991 215 0.0% 346 1.8% 1992 185  14.0% 303  12.4% 1993 148  20.0% 251  17.2% 1994 161 8.8% 265 5.6% 1995 150  6.8% 251  5.3% 1996 173 15.3% 275 9.6% 1997 128  26.0% 248  9.8% 1998 155 21.1% 304 22.6% 1999 145  6.5% 292  3.9% 2000 162 11.7% 298 2.1% 2001 165 1.9% 302 1.3% 2002 202 22.4% 349 15.6% 2003 142  29.7% 274  21.5% % Change  34.0%  19.4% AAGR  3.1%  1.6%

2003 Data Source: " 3a  Data by SIC, for selected SIC codes  SUSB" Query in NAICS to SIC 2004. mdb Raw Data Sour SIC codes 03_ Firms_ LT20 03_ Firms_ 20_ 99 03_ Firms_ 100_ 499 03_ Firms_ 500+ 2911 59 21 21 41 Emp. Size Category No. of Firms No. of Facilities 0 19 59 60 20 99 21 25 100 499 21 26 500+ 41 163 Total 142 274 Petroleum Refineries 93_ TOTAL 94_ TOTAL 95_ TOTAL 96_ TOTAL 97_ TOTAL 148 161 150 173 128 251 265 251 275 248 72,900 73,428 71,697 70,049 67,023 3,686,974 3,866,062 3,836,885 3,857,438 4,023,680 NA NA NA NA 160,443,354 02_ Estab 03_ Estab 98_ Firms 99_ Firms 00_ Firms 349 274 155 145 162 ource: ' SUSB by SIC 2003. xls' 03_ Estab_ LT20 03_ Estab_ 20_ 99 03_ Estab_ 100_ 499 03_ Estab_ 500+ 60 25 26 163 98_ TOTAL 157 306 NA NA NA 01_ Firms 02_ Firms 03_ Firms 165 202 142 Petroleum Refineries ( SIC 2911) Petroleum Refineries ( NAICS 324110) Year Employees % Change Year Employees 1987 74,600 1987 1988 73,200  1.9% 1988 1989 72,400  1.1% 1989 1990 71,900  0.7% 1990 1991 73,900 2.8% 1991 1992 74,800 1.2% 1992 1993 73,100  2.3% 1993 1994 72,000  1.5% 1994 1995 70,400  2.2% 1995 1996 67,200  4.5% 1996 67,200 1997 65,448  2.6% 1997 65,448 1998 64,920  0.8% 1998 64,920 1999 63,619  2.0% 1999 63,619 2000 62,118  2.4% 2000 62,118 2001 63,258 1.8% 2001 63,258 2002 61,874  2.2% 2002 61,874 2003 60,015  3.0% 2003 60,015 2004 58,331  2.8% 2004 58,331 % Change  21.8% AAGR  1.4%

54,000 56,000 58,000 60,000 62,000 64,000 66,000 68,000 70,000 72,000 74,000 76,000 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Petroleum Refineries ( NAICS 324110)

Petroleum Refineries ( SIC 2911) Year Production Hours ( million) Percent Change 1987 103 n/ a 1988 103  0.4% 1989 105 1.7% 1990 106 1.1% 1991 107 0.7% 1992 109 2.6% 1993 107  2.6% 1994 110 3.3% 1995 107  3.0% 1996 103  3.8% 1997 100  2.7% 1998 98  2.1% 1999 94  3.8% 2000 92  1.9% 2001 94 1.3% 2002 85  9.6% 2003 86 1.3% 2004 85  0.3%

Total Percent Change 1987 2004  17.3%

Dollar values in $ 2005 Petroleum Refineries ( SIC 2911)

1987 21,779 103 211 n/ a 1988 30,642 103 298 41.2% 1989 30,797 105 294  1.1% 1990 31,357 106 296 0.7% 1991 26,281 107 247  16.7% 1992 24,789 109 227  8.1% 1993 23,734 107 223  1.7% 1994 29,569 110 269 20.6% 1995 29,185 107 274 1.8% 1996 31,065 103 303 10.7% 1997 36,281 100 363 20.0% 1998 27,917 98 285  21.4% 1999 36,103 94 384 34.4% 2000 41,069 92 445 15.9% 2001 44,145 94 472 6.1% 2002 30,533 85 361  23.5% 2003 41,240 86 482 33.3% 2004 53,070 85 621 29.0% Total Percent Change 1987 2004 143.7%  17.3% 194.7% Annual Average Growth Rate 5.4%  1.1% 6.6% % Change in Value Added Year Production Hours ( millions) Value Added ( millions) $/ Hr Record for the Proposed § 316( b) New Facility Rule 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 A B C Dollar values in millions, $ 2005 Petroleum Refineries ( 2911)

YR Capital Expenditures % Change 1987 3,117 1988 3,446 10.6%

1989 4,263 23.7%

1990 5,247 23.1%

1991 7,436 41.7%

1992 7,968 7.2%

1993 7,593  4.7%

1994 6,862  9.6%

1995 7,140 4.1%

1996 6,208  13.1%

1997 4,987  19.7%

1998 4,845  2.9%

1999 4,517  6.8%

2000 5,252 16.3%

2001 7,463 42.1%

2002 7,956 6.6%

2003 7,268  8.6%

2004 6,710  7.7%

% Change 1987 2004 115.3%

AAGR 4.6%

July 20, 2000 14 of 31 DCTM_ ARP. xls  CapEx Record for the Proposed § 316( b) New Facility Rule 1 2 3 456789 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 A B C D E F G H I J K L Source: U. S. Census Bureau, Current Industrial Reports, Survey of Plant Capacity, 1994, 1996, 2001, 2004 Full Production Capacity Utilization Rate ( Fourth Quarter)

Year Petroleum Refineries ( SIC 2911) Petroleum Refineries ( NAICS 324110)

1989 90 1990 87 1991 91 1992 93 1993 93 1994 95 1995 88 1996 90 90 1997 91 1998 91 1999 93 2000 94 2001 91 2002 91 2003 90 2004 93 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Petroleum Refineries ( NAICS 324110) Petroleum Refineries ( SIC 2911)

July 20, 2000 15 of 31 DCTM_ ARP. xls  CapUtil Record for the Proposed § 316( b) New Facility Rule 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 A B C D E F G H I J K L M U. S. Department of Commerce: Bureau of the Census; International Trade Administration. Outlook Trend Tables, Petroleum Refining Source: http:// www. ita. doc. gov/ td/ industry/ otea/ industry_ sector/ tables_ naics. htm Source: http:// www. ita. doc. gov/ td/ industry/ otea/ industry_ sector/ tables. htm As of 2/ 2/ 2006 Year Value of Imports ( millions) Value of Exports ( millions) Value of Imports ( millions) Value of Exports ( millions)

1989 11,798 4,318 1990 14,269 5,988 1991 10,890 6,356 1992 10,185 5,759 1993 9,742 5,641 1994 9,274 4,958 1995 8,765 5,333 1996 18,510 6,300 1997 20,434 6,882 1998 17,060 5,187 1999 21,886 5,763 2000 40,069 8,728 2001 35,127 8,074 2002 31,857 7,734 Dollar values in millions, $ 2005 Year SIC Value of Imports Value of Exports Value of Shipments Implied Domestic Consumption Import Penetration Export Dependence NAICS Import values for graph NAICS Export values for graph 1989 2911 16,837 6,162 187,227 197,902 9% 3%

1990 2911 19,605 8,227 219,025 230,403 9% 4%

1991 2911 14,458 8,438 193,023 199,042 7% 4%

1992 2911 13,218 7,474 176,809 182,553 7% 4%

1993 2911 12,358 7,155 164,853 170,055 7% 4%

1994 2911 11,519 6,158 159,839 165,200 7% 4%

1995 2911 10,668 6,491 165,743 169,920 6% 4%

1996 2911 22,111 7,526 188,817 203,402 11% 4% 22,111 7,526 1997 2911 24,009 8,087 186,428 202,351 12% 4% 24,009 8,087 1998 2911 19,825 6,027 137,306 151,104 13% 4% 19,825 6,027 1999 2911 25,071 6,602 165,289 183,759 14% 4% 25,071 6,602 2000 2911 44,920 9,784 241,662 276,797 16% 4% 44,920 9,784 2001 2911 38,456 8,839 218,854 248,471 15% 4% 38,456 8,839 2002 2911 34,278 8,322 208,236 234,192 15% 4% 34,278 8,322 Total Percent Change 1989 200 103.6% 35.0% 11.2% 18.3%

Avg. Annual Growth Rate 5.6% 2.3% 0.8% 1.3%

Petroleum Refineries ( SIC 2911) Petroleum Refineries ( NAICS 324110)

Outlook Trends Table by NAICS Outlook Trends Table by SIC 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Imports ( NAICS 324110)

Imports ( SIC 2911)

Exports ( NAICS 324110)

Exports ( SIC 2911)

July 20, 2000 16 of 31 DCTM_ ARP. xls  Trade Source: Value Line Data Net Profit Margin Industry 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Petroleum Refining 0.0337 0.0418 0.0368 0.0479 0.0534 0.0630 0.0448 0.0442 0.0761 0.0611 0.0362 Return on Total Capital Industry 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Petroleum Refining 0.0882 0.1010 0.0838 0.1079 0.1229 0.1431 0.0994 0.0995 0.2020 0.1479 0.0848 Values " Hard Copied" from Net Profit Margin, Return on Total Capital. xls, " Summary" page Net Profit Margin (%) Industry 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Petroleum Refining 3.373 4.181 3.676 4.791 5.336 6.297 4.477 4.424 7.614 6.11 3.615 Return on Total Capital (%) Industry 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Petroleum Refining 8.819 10.1 8.376 10.79 12.29 14.31 9.941 9.948 20.2 14.79 8.476 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Return on T  Petroleum Net Profit M Petroleum R 2003 2004 2005 96 98 Ttl Period 0.0611 0.0775 0.0792 0.0537 0.0540 1.00644219 2003 2004 2005 96 98 Ttl Period 0.1549 0.2132 0.2277 0.1218 0.1340 1.10034977 2003 2004 2005 6.107 7.7479 7.9168 2003 2004 2005 15.49 21.318 22.77 Return on Total Capital  Petroleum Refining Net Profit Margin  Petroleum Refining Source: http:// www. economagic. com/ frbg17. htm# IPMarket section: INDUSTRY SUBTOTALS, INDIVIDUAL SERIE Seasonably Adjusted, Annual Averages Extracted 2/ 2/ 2006 Year Index % Change 1989 88.4 1990 88.3 0.0% 1991 88.3  0.1% 1992 86.1  2.4% 1993 85.0  1.3% 1994 88.4 4.0% 1995 90.2 2.1% 1996 92.0 1.9% 1997 93.7 1.9% 1998 90.1  3.9% 1999 96.7 7.3% 2000 97.0 0.3% 2001 97.3 0.2% 2002 100.0 2.8% 2003 97.4  2.6% 2004 101.5 4.3% 2005 100.3  1.2% 1989 2005 13.5% AAGR 0.8%

Series Title: Industrial Production Index: Petroleum refineries NAICS= 32411; 2002= 100; SA Year Month x Value Average of Value 1989 1 5590.715 90.7 Year Total 1989 2 8888.984 89.0 1989 88.4 1989 3 8888.487 88.5 1990 88.3 1989 4 2287.944 87.9 1991 88.3 1989 5 87.521 87.5 1992 86.1 1989 6 88.761 88.8 1993 85.0 1989 7 8888.84 88.8 1994 88.4 1989 8 7788.131 88.1 1995 90.2 1989 9 2288.747 88.7 1996 92.0 1989 10 88.295 88.3 1997 93.7 1989 11 4488.84 88.8 1998 90.1 1989 12 7784.994 85.0 1999 96.7 1990 1 7789.98 90.0 2000 97.0 1990 2 3392.217 92.2 2001 97.3 1990 3 2287.257 87.3 2002 100.0 1990 4 9987.42 87.4 2003 97.4 1990 5 3385.421 85.4 2004 101.5 1990 6 8886.942 86.9 2005 100.3 1990 7 1189.142 89.1 Grand Total 93.0 1990 8 8890.168 90.2 1990 9 1190.238 90.2 1990 10 9988.405 88.4 1990 11 87.275 87.3 1990 12 1185.357 85.4 Petroleum Refineries NAICS= 32411 1991 1 5586.92 86.9 1991 2 9989.914 89.9 1991 3 5587.748 87.7 1991 4 3387.149 87.1 1991 5 7788.874 88.9 1991 6 2290.147 90.1 1991 7 1188.684 88.7 1991 8 4489.034 89.0 1991 9 9988.463 88.5 1991 10 9986.618 86.6 1991 11 9986.584 86.6 1991 12 7788.984 89.0 1992 1 7787.358 87.4 1992 2 5586.06 86.1 1992 3 8886.856 86.9 1992 4 6688.083 88.1 1992 5 8887.069 87.1 1992 6 1186.363 86.4 1992 7 5586.546 86.5 1992 8 4483 83.0 1992 9 7784.67 84.7 1992 10 6687.056 87.1 1992 11 2285.916 85.9 1992 12 7784.608 84.6 1993 1 9984.809 84.8 1993 2 2285.406 85.4 1993 3 1184.561 84.6 1993 4 8884.252 84.3 1993 5 3383.861 83.9 1993 6 3384.048 84.0 1993 7 5583.738 83.7 1993 8 8883.159 83.2 1993 9 6684.806 84.8 1993 10 5587.476 87.5 1993 11 4487.728 87.7 1993 12 9986.35 86.4 1994 1 4485.429 85.4 1994 2 7785.954 86.0 1994 3 85.933 85.9 1994 4 2289.039 89.0 1994 5 3389.84 89.8 1994 6 3388.54 88.5 1994 7 7787.815 87.8 1994 8 5589.437 89.4 1994 9 9988.746 88.7 1994 10 1188.657 88.7 1994 11 9990.871 90.9 1994 12 90.672 90.7 1995 1 90.832 90.8 1995 2 90.63 90.6 1995 3 2290.908 90.9 1995 4 4489.638 89.6 1995 5 89.26 89.3 1995 6 89.904 89.9 1995 7 3390.715 90.7 1995 8 7790.138 90.1 1995 9 1191.768 91.8 1995 10 9988.838 88.8 1995 11 9989.577 89.6 1995 12 2290.513 90.5 1996 1 7790.749 90.7 1996 2 91.778 91.8 1996 3 6691.397 91.4 1996 4 5591.205 91.2 1996 5 3391.274 91.3 1996 6 1191.695 91.7 1996 7 5590.686 90.7 1996 8 2292.234 92.2 1996 9 7792.652 92.7 1996 10 1193.61 93.6 1996 11 9993.266 93.3 1996 12 92.979 93.0 1997 1 6692.692 92.7 1997 2 93.27 93.3 1997 3 3393.726 93.7 1997 4 8894.28 94.3 1997 5 2295.935 95.9 1997 6 2295.822 95.8 1997 7 7793.216 93.2 1997 8 7793.936 93.9 1997 9 9994.171 94.2 1997 10 5594.002 94.0 1997 11 7791.719 91.7 1997 12 7792.029 92.0 1998 1 91.25 91.3 1998 2 8889.12 89.1 1998 3 2290.343 90.3 1998 4 4489.759 89.8 1998 5 7788.373 88.4 1998 6 8888.856 88.9 1998 7 6690.034 90.0 1998 8 1190.863 90.9 1998 9 9988.849 88.8 1998 10 3388.936 88.9 1998 11 7792.261 92.3 1998 12 6692.744 92.7 1999 1 5596.052 96.1 1999 2 8896.342 96.3 1999 3 9994.866 94.9 1999 4 5596.352 96.4 1999 5 9996.111 96.1 1999 6 5595.593 95.6 1999 7 6697.093 97.1 1999 8 3397.272 97.3 1999 9 98.195 98.2 1999 10 7797.827 97.8 1999 11 96.588 96.6 1999 12 5597.856 97.9 2000 1 9995.066 95.1 2000 2 1195.247 95.2 2000 3 2298.463 98.5 2000 4 2296.253 96.3 2000 5 3397.469 97.5 2000 6 3397.775 97.8 2000 7 2296.97 97.0 2000 8 5597.26 97.3 2000 9 3398.624 98.6 2000 10 5596.784 96.8 2000 11 7797.946 97.9 2000 12 4496.333 96.3 2001 1 7796.006 96.0 2001 2 6696.919 96.9 2001 3 6696.368 96.4 2001 4 6697.08 97.1 2001 5 3397.747 97.7 2001 6 7798.556 98.6 2001 7 8897.894 97.9 2001 8 9996.42 96.4 2001 9 3397.102 97.1 2001 10 3398.481 98.5 2001 11 98.07 98.1 2001 12 7796.397 96.4 2002 1 5599.657 99.7 2002 2 4101.329 101.3 2002 3 6101.016 101.0 2002 4 8101.342 101.3 2002 5 2100.383 100.4 2002 6 3100.399 100.4 2002 7 100.781 100.8 2002 8 9100.104 100.1 2002 9 6699.165 99.2 2002 10 2295.494 95.5 2002 11 8100.126 100.1 2002 12 1100.204 100.2 2003 1 2297.975 98.0 2003 2 4496.72 96.7 2003 3 9998.37 98.4 2003 4 7796.215 96.2 2003 5 2297.942 97.9 2003 6 2294.594 94.6 2003 7 5595.271 95.3 2003 8 4496.889 96.9 2003 9 2298.257 98.3 2003 10 2298.496 98.5 2003 11 9998.557 98.6 2003 12 7799.16 99.2 2004 1 4498.721 98.7 2004 2 3398.978 99.0 2004 3 5101.81 101.8 2004 4 9101.005 101.0 2004 5 7101.498 101.5 2004 6 4101.482 101.5 2004 7 9102.756 102.8 2004 8 103.103 103.1 2004 9 1100.198 100.2 2004 10 1101.176 101.2 2004 11 9102.985 103.0 2004 12 9104.685 104.7 2005 1 4103.165 103.2 2005 2 7104.938 104.9 2005 3 5103.043 103.0 2005 4 1103.945 103.9 2005 5 7102.439 102.4 2005 6 8104.976 105.0 2005 7 4102.151 102.2 2005 8 1100.551 100.6 2005 9 7794.01 94.0 2005 10 5590.411 90.4 2005 11 1197.186 97.2 2005 12 6696.46 96.5 RIES, AND SPECIAL AGGREGATES Convert Data to $ 2005 4 Digit SIC Code Year Value of Shipments ($ 1,000) Employees Payroll ($ 1,000) Production Workers Production Worker Hours ( 1,000) Production Worker Wages ($ 1,000) SICKEY YR VALUE ( 000) EMP PAY WORKERS HOURS WAGES 2911 1987 181,027,321 74,600 4,357,723 50,000 103,300 2,752,028 2911 1988 176,007,709 73,200 4,338,224 49,500 102,900 2,712,334 2911 1989 187,226,938 72,400 4,258,664 47,900 104,600 2,652,442 2911 1990 219,024,924 71,900 4,390,636 47,300 105,800 2,697,913 2911 1991 193,022,541 73,900 4,578,114 47,600 106,500 2,751,329 2911 1992 176,809,454 74,800 4,719,150 47,900 109,300 2,799,720 2911 1993 164,852,779 73,100 4,738,145 47,300 106,500 2,842,405 2911 1994 159,839,248 72,000 4,732,711 46,600 110,000 2,891,694 2911 1995 165,743,208 70,400 4,613,844 45,600 106,700 2,829,991 2911 1996 188,816,992 67,200 4,464,793 43,400 102,600 2,746,820 2911 1997 186,428,191 65,448 4,564,568 42,227 99,837 2,800,911 2911 1998 137,305,982 64,920 4,607,235 0 97,788 0 2911 1999 165,289,297 63,619 4,562,728 0 94,107 0 2911 2000 241,661,541 62,118 4,474,946 0 92,334 0 2911 2001 218,854,288 63,258 4,634,229 0 93,533 0 2911 2002 208,236,023 61,874 4,719,084 0 84,532 0 2911 2003 235,916,089 60,015 5,011,361 0 85,643 0 2911 2004 296,038,187 58,331 5,275,573 0 85,415 0 Value Added ($ 1,000) Cost of Materials ($ 1,000) New Capital Expenditures ($ 1,000) End of Year Inventories ($ 1,000) VALADD MATERLS CAPEXP INVET 21,779,272 160,524,885 3,117,036 13,468,198 2 30,642,030 144,149,335 3,446,258 11,863,204 3 30,797,214 157,727,403 4,262,660 13,155,320 4 31,356,579 190,344,686 5,246,752 16,305,504 5 26,280,878 164,512,613 7,435,652 13,140,240 6 24,788,546 151,721,898 7,968,034 12,616,714 7 23,733,601 139,886,471 7,592,855 10,937,577 8 29,568,542 131,041,419 6,861,642 11,725,392 9 29,184,901 136,968,486 7,140,156 11,575,201 10 31,064,693 158,729,544 6,207,969 12,803,205 11 36,280,972 149,872,202 4,986,969 12,593,464 12 27,917,255 107,157,167 4,844,547 0 13 36,102,623 130,739,258 4,516,849 0 14 41,069,150 202,428,190 5,251,860 0 15 44,145,407 173,775,938 7,463,194 0 16 30,533,123 179,011,691 7,956,111 0 17 41,239,669 195,492,599 7,268,214 0 18 53,069,580 245,220,887 6,710,383 0 Source: GDP  2005. xls Title: Gross Dom Bureau of Economic Analysis  Implicit Price Deflator. Series ID: GDPDEF Source: U. S. Depart Convert dollar values to what year? 2005 Release: Gross Dom GDP Value for $ 2005 112.103 Seasonal Adjustment: Seasonally Frequency: Quarterly Units: Index 2000= GDP Deflator Date Range: 1947 01 01 1987 73.188 1.532 Last Updated: 2006 01 27 1988 75.685 1.481 1989 78.552 1.427 1990 81.591 1.374 1991 84.440 1.328 1992 86.380 1.298 1993 88.376 1.268 1994 90.254 1.242 1995 92.103 1.217 1996 93.847 1.195 1997 95.410 1.175 1998 96.468 1.162 1999 97.862 1.146 2000 99.997 1.121 2001 102.399 1.095 2002 104.185 1.076 2003 106.298 1.055 2004 109.091 1.028 2005 112.103 1.000 mestic Product: Implicit Price Deflator artment of Commerce: Bureau of Economic Analysis mestic Product lly Adjusted 00= 100 01 to 2005 10 01 27 10: 05 AM CT Record for the Proposed § 316( b) New Facility Rule 1 2 3 456789 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 A B C D E F G H I J K L Source: Department of Commerce, Census of Manufactures and Annual Survey of Manufactures, 1987 1997 Source: 2002 Economic Census ( for 1997 2001 data) and Annual Survey of Manufactures 2003 ( for 2002 and 2003 data). Copied from ' 1997  2003 NAICS to SIC Final Data. xls'

4 Digit SIC Code Year Value of Shipments ($ 1,000) Employees Payroll ($ 1,000) Production Workers Production Worker Hours ( 1,000) Production Worker Wages ($ 1,000) Value Added ($ 1,000) Cost of Materials ($ 1,000) New Capital Expenditures ($ 1,000) End of Year Inventories ($ 1,000)

SICKEY YR VALUE EMP PAY WORKERS HOURS WAGES VALADD MATERLS CAPEXP INVET 2911 1987 118,186,200 74,600 2,845,000 50,000 103,300 1,796,700 14,218,900 104,800,900 2,035,000 8,792,900 2911 1988 118,829,500 73,200 2,928,900 49,500 102,900 1,831,200 20,687,600 97,320,700 2,326,700 8,009,300 2911 1989 131,192,300 72,400 2,984,100 47,900 104,600 1,858,600 21,580,000 110,521,600 2,986,900 9,218,100 2911 1990 159,411,100 71,900 3,195,600 47,300 105,800 1,963,600 22,822,000 138,537,000 3,818,700 11,867,500 2911 1991 145,391,500 73,900 3,448,400 47,600 106,500 2,072,400 19,795,700 123,916,800 5,600,800 9,897,700 2911 1992 136,239,000 74,800 3,636,300 47,900 109,300 2,157,300 19,100,600 116,908,000 6,139,700 9,721,700 2911 1993 129,961,100 73,100 3,735,300 47,300 106,500 2,240,800 18,710,300 110,279,000 5,985,800 8,622,600 2911 1994 128,686,400 72,000 3,810,300 46,600 110,000 2,328,100 23,805,600 105,501,300 5,524,300 9,440,100 2911 1995 136,173,400 70,400 3,790,700 45,600 106,700 2,325,100 23,978,100 112,532,300 5,866,300 9,510,100 2911 1996 158,068,100 67,200 3,737,700 43,400 102,600 2,299,500 26,005,800 132,880,400 5,197,000 10,718,200 2911 1997 158,667,598 65,448 3,884,869 42,227 99,837 2,383,834 30,878,456 127,555,077 4,244,371 10,718,200 2911 1998 118,155,923 64,920 3,964,664 97,788 24,023,637 92,211,962 4,168,878 2911 1999 144,291,778 63,619 3,983,102 94,107 31,516,328 114,130,802 3,943,051 2911 2000 215,564,518 62,118 3,991,697 92,334 36,634,094 180,567,975 4,684,712 2911 2001 199,909,550 63,258 4,233,075 93,533 40,324,037 158,733,328 6,817,156 2911 2002 193,528,006 61,874 4,385,768 84,532 28,376,524 166,367,832 7,394,159 2911 2003 223,699,709 60,015 4,751,859 85,643 39,104,166 185,369,457 6,891,846 2911 2004 288,084,189 58,331 5,133,828 85,415 51,643,699 238,632,256 6,530,087 July 20, 2000 29 of 31 DCTM_ ARP. xls  Raw Data  ASM Record for the Proposed § 316( b) New Facility Rule 123456789 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 A B C D E F G H I J K L SICKEY YR SIZEKEY ESTAB EMP VALADD VALUE CAPEXP Value($ 1999, mill) Value of Shipment ( in $ 1992, mill)

2911 1992 all estab 232 74,800 19,100,600 136,239,000 6,139,700 128,061 136,239 2911 1992 1 4 17 0 9,600 31,500 1,000 30 32 2911 1992 5 9 7 0 34,600 59,600 0 56 60 2911 1992 10 19 11 200 15,900 80,700 500 76 81 2911 1992 20 49 35 1,200 117,600 1,087,500 14,000 1,022 1,088 2911 1992 50 99 22 1,700 240,100 1,878,400 32,100 1,766 1,878 2911 1992 100 249 45 8,000 2,274,400 14,005,100 497,300 13,164 14,005 2911 1992 250 499 49 16,900 4,429,500 34,518,700 1,346,400 32,447 34,519 2911 1992 500 999 26 18,100 5,889,000 35,005,300 1,697,500 32,904 35,005 2911 1992 1,000 2,499 20 28,900 6,089,900 49,572,300 2,550,900 46,597 49,572 Less than 100 40% Value of Shipments ($ 1992, mill) by Employment Size Category YR 1987 1992 COMPANY 131 VALUE 136,579,300 LARGE4 30 LARGE8 49 LARGE20 78 LARGE50 97 HERFIND 414 SPECIAL 99 99 COVERAG 99 99 YR 1992 COMPANY 132 ESTAB 232 EST_ SZ1 35 EST_ SZ2 57 EST_ SZ3 140 EMP 74,800 TOTCOMP 4,570,800 PAY 3,636,300 WORKERS 47,900 HOURS 109,300 WAGES 2,157,300 MATERLS 116,908,000 PARTS 107,872,200 FUELS 2,113,400 ELECT 1,388,300 CONWORK 1,566,500 ELECTPQ 33,027,600 ELECTGS 11,591,400 VALUE 136,239,000 VALADD 19,100,600 INVBT 9,830,900 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 1 4 5 9 10 19 20 49 50 99 100 249 250 499 500 999 1,000 2,499 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 1 4 5 9 10 19 20 49 50 99 100 249 250 499 500 999 1,000 2,499 July 20, 2000 30 of 31 DCTM_ ARP. xls  census Record for the Proposed § 316( b) New Facility Rule 1 2 3 45 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 A B C D E Petroleum Refineries ( SIC 2911)

Year Value of Shipments ($ 2003 millions) Cost of Materials ($ 2003 millions) Payroll ( all employees) ($ 2003 millions) Operating Margin 1987 181,027 160,525 4,358 9%

1988 176,008 144,149 4,338 16%

1989 187,227 157,727 4,259 13%

1990 219,025 190,345 4,391 11%

1991 193,023 164,513 4,578 12%

1992 176,809 151,722 4,719 12%

1993 164,853 139,886 4,738 12%

1994 159,839 131,041 4,733 15%

1995 165,743 136,968 4,614 15%

1996 188,817 158,730 4,465 14%

1997 186,428 149,872 4,565 17%

1998 137,306 107,157 4,607 19%

1999 165,289 130,739 4,563 18%

2000 241,662 202,428 4,475 14%

2001 218,854 173,776 4,634 18%

July 20, 2000 31 of 31 DCTM_ ARP. xls  asm opmar


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 35718]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12601]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

49 CFR Parts 525 and 531

[NHTSA-2008-0115]

Exemptions From Average Fuel Economy Standards; Passenger
Automobile Average Fuel Economy Standards

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NHTSA is withdrawing a proposed decision granting an exemption
to Mosler Automotive (Mosler) from the industry-wide passenger car
Corporate Average Fuel Economy standard for model years 2008-2010 and
setting alternative standards for Mosler for those model years. Mosler
did not produce any vehicles during those model years, and therefore
granting the exemption would serve no useful purpose.

DATES: NHTSA is withdrawing the proposed rule published June 17, 2008
(73 FR 34242) as of June 13, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Bayer, Engineer, Fuel Economy
Division, Office of Rulemaking, by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by fax at
(202) 493-2290 or Hannah Fish, Attorney Advisor, Vehicle Standards and
Harmonization, Office of the Chief Counsel, by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER>
or by fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NHTSA received a petition from Mosler on
June 19, 2007, seeking exemption from the passenger automobile fuel
economy standards for model years (MYs) 2008 through 2010. In its
petition, Mosler stated that it manufactured 15 vehicles in 2004.
Mosler estimated that it would produce 40 vehicles in 2008, 50 vehicles
in 2009, and 60 vehicles in 2010. NHTSA published a proposed decision
establishing an alternative standard for Mosler for MYs 2008-2010 at 73
FR 34242 (June 17, 2008). NHTSA has since confirmed that Mosler did not
produce any vehicles for those model years. Therefore, NHTSA is
withdrawing the June 17, 2008 proposed grant of exemption and
establishment of alternative standards, because granting the exemption
would serve no useful purpose.

    Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.95.
Steven S. Cliff,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022-12601 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 61424]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24701]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4077-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2012-0002]

Ohio; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Ohio (FEMA-4077-DR), dated August 20, 2012, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 20, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Ohio is hereby amended to include the following areas
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the
event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of
August 20, 2012.

    Vinton and Wyandot Counties for Public Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2012-24701 Filed 10-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 208 (Friday, October 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65280-65282]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23464]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Noise Compatibility Program for Duluth International Airport, St.
Louis County, Minnesota

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Approval of a Duluth International Airport (DLH) noise
compatibility program.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces its
findings for the noise compatibility program submitted by DLH, see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for details. On April 11, 2022 the FAA
determined that the noise exposure maps submitted by DLH were in
compliance with applicable requirements. On October 6, 2022, the FAA
approved the DLH noise compatibility program. All of the
recommendations of the program were approved. No program elements
relating to new or revised flight procedures for noise abatement were
proposed by the DLH.

DATES: The effective date of the FAA's approval of the DLH noise
compatibility program is October 6. 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Josh Fitzpatrick, Federal Aviation
Administration, Environmental Protection Specialist, 6020 South 28th
Avenue, Room 102, Minneapolis, MN 55450,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces FAA's approval of the
noise compatibility program for DLH, effective on October 6, 2022. Per
United States Code section 47504 (49 U.S.C. 47504) and Title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR), part 150, an airport sponsor who
previously submitted a noise exposure map may submit to the FAA a noise
compatibility program which sets forth the measures taken or proposed
by the airport sponsor for the reduction of existing non-compatible
land uses and prevention of additional non-compatible land uses within
the area covered by the noise exposure maps. As required by 49 U.S.C.
47504, such programs must be developed in consultation with interested
and affected parties including local communities, government agencies,
airport users, and the FAA. The FAA does not substitute its judgment
for that of the airport sponsor with respect to which measures should
be recommended for action. The FAA approval or disapproval of an
airports recommendations in their noise compatibility program are made
in accordance with the requirements and standards pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
47504 and 14 CFR part 150, which is limited to the following
determinations:
    a. The noise compatibility program was developed in accordance with
the provisions and procedures of 14 CFR 150.23;
    b. Program measures are reasonably consistent with achieving the
goals of reducing existing non-compatible land uses around the airport
and preventing the introduction of additional non-compatible land uses;
    c. Program measures would not create an undue burden on interstate
or foreign commerce, unjustly discriminate against types or classes of
aeronautical uses, violate the terms of airport grant agreements, or
intrude into areas preempted by the Federal Government; and
    d. Program measures relating to the use of flight procedures can be
implemented within the period covered by the program without derogating
safety, adversely affecting the efficient use and management of the
navigable airspace and air traffic control systems, or adversely
affecting other powers and responsibilities of the Administrator
prescribed by law.
    Specific limitations of FAA's approval of noise compatibility
programs are delineated in 14 CFR 150.5. Approval is not a
determination concerning the acceptability of land uses under Federal,
state, or local law. Approval does not by itself constitute an FAA
implementing action. A request for Federal action or approval to
implement specific noise compatibility measures may be required, and an
FAA decision on the request may require an environmental assessment of
the proposed action. Approval does not constitute a commitment by the
FAA to financially assist in the implementation of the noise
compatibility program nor a determination that all measures covered by
the noise compatibility program are eligible for grant-in-aid funding
from the FAA. Where federal funding is sought, requests must be
submitted to the FAA Airports District Office at 6020 South 28th
Avenue, Room 102, Minneapolis, MN 55450.
    DLH submitted to the FAA on December 13, 2021 the noise exposure
maps, descriptions, and other documentation produced during the noise
compatibility planning study conducted from October 2, 2019 and
December 13, 2021. The DLH noise exposure maps were determined by FAA
to be in compliance with applicable requirements on April 11, 2022.
Notice of this determination was published in the Federal Register on
April 15, 2022 ``87 FR 22616''.
    The DLH proposed noise compatibility program is comprised of
actions designed for phased implementation by airport management and
adjacent jurisdictions from December 13, 2021 to 2026. It was requested
that the FAA evaluate and approve this material as a noise
compatibility program as described in 49 U.S.C. 47504. The FAA began
its review of the program on April 11, 2022 and was required by a
provision of 49 U.S.C. 47504 to approve or disapprove the program
within 180 days, other than the use of new or modified flight
procedures for noise control. Failure to approve or disapprove such
program within the 180-day period shall be deemed an approval of such
program.
    The submitted program contained 12 proposed measures to minimize
impacts of aviation noise on and off the airport. The FAA completed its
review and determined that the procedural and substantive requirements
of the 49 U.S.C. 47504 and 14 CFR part 150 were satisfied. The overall
program, therefore, was approved by the FAA effective October 6, 2022.
    Outright approval was granted for all the specific program
elements. Program elements include:
    Measure M-A: Offer Residential Sound-insulation Treatment to
Single- and Multi-Family Homes (47 units) within the Average Day-Night
Sound Level (DNL) 65 decibels (dB) and above Noise Contours. Offer
Residential Sound-insulation treatment to Single- Family Homes (17
units) within the Block Rounding Area outside the DNL 65 dB Noise
Contour.
    Measure M-B (1997 NCP Measure M-1): Offer Land Acquisition Program
to Single-Family Homes (7 units) within the DNL 70 dB and above Noise
Contour.
    Measure M-C: Offer Land Acquisition to Birchwood Mobile Estates
(102 Mobile Homes) within the Noise Mitigation Program Area (NMPA) #1
boundary and 1 additional mobile home property located to the northwest
of the airport within the DNL 65 dB and above noise contour.
    Measure M-D: Offer Avigation Easements to owner-occupied single-
family homes within NMPA #1 if acquisition (within DNL 70 dB noise
contour only) and sound-insulation is declined.
    Measure M-E: Offer Avigation Easements to one (1) mobile home
within NMPA #1, located along Lavaque Bypass Road, if acquisition is
declined.
    Measure M-F: Develop an Airport Land Use Management District
(ALUMD).
    Measure M-G: Adopt Updated Subdivision Regulations.
    Measure M-H: Adopt Improved Building Codes.
    Measure M-I: Develop a Voluntary Fair Disclosure Program.
    Measure P-A: Continue Logging of Noise Complaints.
    Measure P-B: Initiate Community Roundtable or Noise Abatement
Committee.
    Measure P-C: Perform Regular Updates to the noise exposure map and
review of the noise compatibility program.
    These determinations are set forth in detail in the Record of
Approval signed by the FAA Airports Great Lakes Division Director on
October 6, 2022. The Record of Approval, as well as other evaluation
materials and the documents comprising the submittal, are available for
review at the FAA office listed above and at the administrative offices
of the Duluth Airports Authority (DAA). The Record of Approval also
will be available on the internet on the FAAs website at http://www.faa.gov/airports/environmental/airport_noise/part_150/states/ and
the DLH website at https://duluthairport.com/noise-study/#documents.

    Issued in Chicago, IL, on October 6, 2022.
Susan Mowery-Schalk,
Director, Office of Airports, AGL-600, FAA Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. 2022-23464 Filed 10-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: May 27, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 100)]
[Notices]
[Page 25234-25235]
[DOCID:fr27my09-29]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER05-1410-000; EL05-148-000; ER09-412-000]

PJM Interconnection L.L.C.; Notice of Filings

May 19, 2009.
    On March 26, 2009, the Commission issued an order accepting new
tariff provisions relating to PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM's)
Reliability Pricing Model (RPM) capacity market, including changes to
the procedures governing Incremental Auctions that became effective
March 27, 2009.\1\ One such revision was to the table of default
Avoidable Cost Rate (ACR) values for the Base Residual Auction and
three subsequent Incremental Auctions that PJM administers for each
Delivery Year. Capacity suppliers who fail the market power test may
use these ACR values as default bids when they offer capacity into the
Incremental Auctions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 126 FERC ] 61,275 (2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On April 29, 2009, the PJM Market Monitor filed a letter to the
Commission stating that, due to an oversight on its part, it believes
the ACR values contained in those provisions are higher than
appropriate for the upcoming Incremental Auctions in June 2009 and
January 2010. The Market Monitor is concerned that use of these ACR
values may lead to non-competitive market outcomes in the first
Incremental Auction (June 1-5, 2009) for Delivery

Year 2011/2012 and the third Incremental Auction (January 4-8, 2010)
for Delivery Year 2010/2011 and asks the Commission to take action as
necessary to correct this condition, if it agrees with the Market
Monitor's views regarding non-competitive market outcomes.
    PJM filed a responsive letter on April 29, 2009, containing
correspondence between PJM and the Market Monitor. In this
correspondence, PJM stated that, in its view, an expedited tariff
change is not necessary, and that it believes that the prices produced
by use of the ACR values accepted in the March 26 Order will lead to
rates that are within the range of reasonable variation. PJM also
stated that the RPM market design does not anticipate the default ACR
values changing for each Delivery Year, and recommends that rather than
seeking a tariff change on an emergency basis, PJM's stakeholders
should consider this issue and, if they so choose, present this issue
to the Commission in an orderly fashion. Therefore, while indicating
that ACR changes are not feasible or advisable for the June 2009
Incremental Auction, PJM commits to add the topic of default ACR values
to the agenda for the Capacity Markets Evolution Committee as an item
to be discussed and resolved by stakeholders by September 1, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission in lieu of paper
using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to
file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of comments
to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment date: June 3, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12214 Filed 5-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76411-76412]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26414]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA 2016-0002-N-22]

Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment
Request

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) and its
implementing regulations, FRA seeks the Office of Management and
Budget's (OMB) approval of the proposed information collection
activities abstracted below. However, before submitting this proposed
information collection request (ICR) to OMB for clearance, FRA is
soliciting public comment on specific aspects of the activities
identified below.

DATES: Comments must be received no later than January 3, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on any or all of the information
activities described in this notice by mail to either Ms. Rachel Grice,
Engineering Psychologist or Michael Jones, Engineering Psychologist,
Office of Railroad Policy and Development, Human Factors Division, RPD-
34, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Mail Stop 20, Washington, DC
20590; or Ms. Kimberly Toone, Information Collection Clearance Officer,
Office of Information Technology, RAD-20, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC 20590. Commenters requesting that FRA
acknowledge receipt of their respective comments must include a self-
addressed stamped postcard stating, ``Comments on OMB Control Number
2130-New,'' and should also include the title of the collection of
information. Alternatively, comments may be faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER> or
(202) 493-6630, or emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please refer to the
assigned OMB control number in any correspondence submitted. FRA will
summarize comments received in response to this notice in a subsequent
notice and include them in its information collection submission to OMB
for approval.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Rachel Grice at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
Mr. Michael Jones at<PHONE_NUMBER> or Ms. Kimberly Toone, at (202) 493-
6132. These telephone numbers are not toll-free.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520, and its
implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, Rulemaking Procedures,
require Federal agencies to provide 60 days' notice to the public for
comment on information collection activities before seeking OMB
approval. See 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A); 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1),
1320.10(e)(1), and 1320.12(a). Specifically, FRA invites interested
respondents to comment on the following summary of proposed information
collection activities regarding: (1) Whether the information collection
activities are necessary for FRA to properly execute its functions,
including whether the activities will have practical utility; (2) the
accuracy of FRA's estimates of the burden of the information collection
activities, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used to determine the estimates; (3) ways FRA can enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information being collected; and (4) ways
FRA can minimize the burden of information collection activities on the
public by automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of information technology (e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses). See 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A); 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1).
    FRA believes soliciting public comment will promote its efforts to
reduce the administrative and paperwork burdens associated with the
collection of information Federal regulations mandate, including: (1)
Reducing reporting burdens; (2) organizing information collection
requirements in a ``user friendly'' format to improve the use of such
information; and (3) accurately assessing the resources expended to
retrieve and produce information requested. See 44 U.S.C. 3501.
    Below is a brief summary of the proposed ICR that FRA will submit
for OMB approval as required under the PRA:
    Title: Cab Technology Integration Lab (CTIL) Head-up Display
Survey.
    OMB Control Number: 2130-New.
    Abstract: FRA is proposing a study which will focus on railroad
engineer performance. Distraction is a common problem in locomotive
cabs and preliminary research suggests that the dispatch radio may have
significant effects on crew workload and performance. Anecdotal
evidence from four train engineers indicates that the radio is the most
distracting technology in the cab. There are generally two categories
of dispatcher-engineer communications. Some require immediate action
and should be provided in the usual manner (over the radio). However,
others do not require immediate action and could be provided as a
written message.
    FRA seeks to develop an understanding of how the dispatch radio
communications could potentially lead to human-performance degradation
in the railroad engineer, and if a Head-Up Display (HUD) would be an
alternative and superior technology to communicating information
usually conveyed over the dispatch radio.

    HUDs have been incorporated and researched extensively in aviation
and motor vehicle applications because of their relative advantage over
head-down displays (HDDs). Research in the Cab Technology Integration
Lab (CTIL), FRA's locomotive simulator at the Volpe Center in
Cambridge, MA, has shown that in-cab displays, such as moving maps, can
lead to prolonged heads-down time (Young, et al., 2015). Additionally,
research done in the field in naturalistic studies using passenger
vehicles has also shown that looking inside a vehicle for interface
control features increases the risk of an accident (Liang, Lee, &
Yekhsatyan, 2012). Thus, a HUD has real advantages over an HDD. An
investigation of alternative technologies that increase forward-track
viewing time is worth pursuing.
    To test the hypothesis that display communications on a HUD can
reduce workload and distractions while increasing the time the engineer
keeps his or her eyes on the forward track, an experiment will be run
in the CTIL with four different conditions: HUD presence (present or
absent) will be crossed with radio communications (present or absent).
Forty train engineers will participate in the simulator study and
survey data collection. The HUD will be developed and installed by the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    A subjective measure of workload, such as the NASA TLX, will be
utilized in this study and provided to the train engineers after the
simulator experiment. In addition, usability of the system will be
rated with a usability scale by the train engineers. Analysis of the
simulator data, workload data, and usability survey data will allow FRA
to assess whether the HUD has a relative advantage over the HDD in
rail, and if it could mitigate performance declines related to the
radio communications.
    Affected Public: Railroad Workers.
    Respondent Universe: 40 Railroad Engineers.
    Frequency of Submission: On occasion.

                                                Reporting Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Average  time
             Form No.               Respondent  universe      Total  annual       per response    Total  annual
                                                                responses           (hours)       burden  hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Form FRA F 6180.168--Simulator      40 Engineers........  40 surveys..........             6.5              260
 Survey.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Total Responses: 40.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 260 hours.
    Type of Request: Approval of a new information collection.
    Status: Regular Review.
    Under 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5 CFR 1320.5(b) and 1320.8(b)(3)(vi),
FRA informs all interested parties that FRA may not conduct or sponsor,
and a respondent is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

    Authority:  44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 26, 2016.
Patrick Warren,
Acting Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2016-26414 Filed 11-1-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


5637 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 23 / Tuesday, February 4, 2003 / Notices 31, 2002), or go to http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket. Title: NSPS for Petroleum Dry Cleaners ( 40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJ) ( OMB Control No. 2060   0079, EPA ICR Number 0997.07). This is a request to renew an existing approved collection that is scheduled to expire on January 31, 2003. Under the OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards ( NSPS) for the Petroleum Dry Cleaning industry ( subpart JJJ) were proposed on December 14, 1982 and promulgated on September 21, 1984. These standards apply to the owners or operators of petroleum dry cleaning facilities constructed, reconstructed, or modified after December 14, 1982 whose total manufacturer's rated dryer capacity is equal to or greater than 38 kilograms ( 84 pounds). This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJ. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15, and are identified on the form and/ or instrument, if applicable. Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 16 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. Respondents/ Affected Entities: Petroleum Dry Cleaners. Estimated Number of Respondents: 18. Frequency of Response: initial. Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 1,483 hours. Estimated Total Annual Cost: $ 84,720, includes $ 0 annualized capital or O& M costs. Changes in the Estimates: There is no change of 1,483 hours in the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens.

Dated: January 28, 2003. Oscar Morales, Director, Collection Strategies Division. [ FR Doc. 03   2538 Filed 2   3   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ OECA   2002   0020; FRL   7447   4]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission of EPA ICR No. 0659.09 ( OMB No. 2060   0108) to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act ( 44 U. S. C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that the following Information Collection Request ( ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget ( OMB) for review and approval: NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances ( 40 CFR part 60, subpart SS), ( OMB Control No. 2060   0108, EPA ICR No. 0659.09) The ICR, which is abstracted below, describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated burden and cost. DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before March 6, 2003. ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leonard Lazarus, Compliance Assessment and Media Programs Division, Office of Enforcement and Compliance, Milked 2223A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: ( 202) 564   6369; fax number: ( 202) 564   0050; e mail address: lazarus. leonard@ epa. gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 1320.12. On June 20, 2002 ( 67 FR 41981), EPA sought comments on this ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8( d). EPA received no comments. EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID No. OECA   2002   0020, which is available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center ( ECDIC) in the EPA Docket Center ( EPA/ DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4: 30 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is ( 202) 566   1744, and the telephone number for the NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliance ( 40 CFR part 60, subpart SS) Docket is ( 202) 566   1514). An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA Dockets ( DOCKET) at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket. Use DOCKET to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select `` search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified above. Any comments related to this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days of this notice, and according to the following detailed instructions: ( 1) Submit your comments to EPA online using DOCKET ( our preferred method), by e mail to docket. oeca@ epa. gov, or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code; 2201T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, and ( 2) Mail your comments to OMB at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget ( OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503. EPA's policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing in DOCKET as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version of the comment that is placed in DOCKET. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket. Although identified as an item in the official docket, information claimed as CBI, or whose disclosure is otherwise restricted by statute, is not included in the official public docket, and will not be available for public viewing in DOCKET. For further information about the electronic docket, see EPA's Federal VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 21: 08 Feb 03, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 04FEN1. SGM 04FEN1 5638 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 23 / Tuesday, February 4, 2003 / Notices Register notice describing the electronic docket at 67 FR 38102 ( May 31, 2002), or go to http:// www. epa. gov./ edocket. Title: NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances ( 40 CFR part 60, subpart SS) ( OMB Control No. 2060   0108, EPA ICR Number 0659.09). This is a request to renew an existing approved collection that is scheduled to expire on January 31, 2003. Under the OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards ( NSPS) for Surface Coating of Large Appliances, published at 40 CFR part 60, subpart SS were proposed on December 24, 1980 and promulgated on October 27, 1982. These standards apply to each large appliance surface coating operation in which organic coatings are applied that commenced construction, modification or reconstruction after December 24, 1980. Approximately 72 sources are currently subject to the standards, and it is estimated that zero sources per year will become subject to the standard while an equal number will go off line during this time period. Volatile Organic Compounds ( VOCs) are the pollutants regulated under this subpart, and this information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 60, subpart SS. Owners or operators of the affected facilities described must make initial reports when a source becomes subject; conduct and report on a performance test; demonstrate and report on continuous monitor performance; and maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility. Semiannual reports of excess emissions are required. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance; and are required, in general, of all sources subject to NSPS. Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least 2 years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records. The estimated total cost of this ICR will be $ 1,093,710 over the next three years ( including labor hours, operating & maintenance costs, and start up costs; $ 365,570 per year x 3 years). All reports are sent to the delegated State or Local authority. In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent directly to the EPA Regional Office. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15, and are identified on the form and/ or instrument, if applicable. Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 6 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. Respondents/ Affected Entities: Owners/ Operators of facilities manufacturing large appliances in which organic surface coatings are applied. Estimated Number of Respondents: 72. Frequency of Response: Semiannual/ quarterly, every other year for excess emission report. Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 6,288 hours. Estimated Total Annual Cost: $ 365,570, which includes $ 5,400 annualized capital or O& M costs. Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 23,276 hours and $ 613,000 in the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens. This decrease is caused by several factors. The wage estimates were revised based on the current prevailing rates for both the Agency and the sources. This included the appropriate calculation of wage overhead in both categories. The number respondents were based on date collected for these same source categories for the development of a Maximum Achievable Control Technology ( MACT) emission standard for hazardous air pollutants. This date showed a much smaller universe of sources and also revealed that a very small percentage of these respondents use thermal control devises ( less than 5 percent). The total number of sources covered by this ICR has decreased greatly since the last renewal was prepared and no growth is occurring in the industry. These factors significantly reduced the burden on the facilities and the Agency.

Dated: January 28, 2003. Oscar Morales, Director, Collection Strategies Division. [ FR Doc. 03   2539 Filed 2   4   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ CO   001   0073; FRL   7447   9 ]

Adequacy Status of the Fort Collins, Colorado Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for Transportation Conformity Purposes AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Notice of adequacy.

SUMMARY: In this document, EPA is notifying the public that we have found that the motor vehicle emissions budgets in the Fort Collins, Colorado carbon monoxide ( CO) maintenance plan, that was submitted by the Governor on August 9, 2002, are adequate for conformity purposes. On March 2, 1999, the DC Circuit Court ruled that budgets in submitted State Implementation Plans ( SIPs) cannot be used for conformity determinations until EPA has affirmatively found them adequate. As a result of our finding, the North Front Range Transportation & Air Quality Planning Council, the City of Fort Collins, the Colorado Department of Transportation and the U. S. Department of Transportation are required to use the motor vehicle emissions budgets from this submitted maintenance plan for future conformity determinations. DATES: This finding is effective February 19, 2003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kerri Fiedler, Air & Radiation Program ( 8P   AR), United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, 999 18th Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado 80202   2466, ( 303) 312   6493. The letter documenting our finding is available at EPA's conformity Web site: http:// www. epa. gov/ otaq/ transp/ conform/ adequacy. htm.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever `` we'', `` us'', or `` our'' are used we mean EPA. This action is simply an announcement of a finding that we have already made. We sent a letter to the Colorado Air Pollution Control Division VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 21: 08 Feb 03, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 04FEN1. SGM 04FEN1