Instructions for Submitting Data Corrections

Introduction

EPA seeks comments on hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions and other
model input data that we used to assess risks from selected industrial
major source categories, as required by section 112(f) of the Clean Air
Act. The source of this information is the most recent version of the
2005 National Emissions Inventory (2005 NEI), updated with data
collected by EPA’s Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. For
more information about the 2005 National Emissions Inventory (NEI),
please go to:    HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html"
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html .

The Microsoft Access file  will enable you to review and suggest
revisions to HAP emissions and other descriptive information associated
with all facilities in a single Maximum Achievable Control Technology
(MACT) category. Instructions for using this file to review the data,
revise the data, and submit revisions to EPA are outlined below.
HYPERLINK  \l "Submit"  Section 6  lists specific steps for submitting
your final changes to the EPA.   HYPERLINK  \l "DataDict"  Section 7  of
this document defines important terms (e.g., MACT, SIC, SCC, etc.) and
all data elements found in this file. The complete outline for this
document is listed below:

  HYPERLINK  \l "Application"  Application Overview

  HYPERLINK  \l "Summary"  View Summary Data

 HYPERLINK  \l "ChangeData" Options

MACT HAP Emissions

State County MACT Emissions

Facility MACT HAP Emissions

All Data

  HYPERLINK  \l "FilterBy"  Filter Data

  HYPERLINK  \l "Revise"  Revise Data

 HYPERLINK  \l "RevEmissions1" Revise Emission Fields

 HYPERLINK  \l "RevStack" Revise Stack Fields

 HYPERLINK  \l "RevProcess2" Revise Process Fields

   HYPERLINK  \l "RevFacil1"  Revise Facility Information

  HYPERLINK  \l "AddFacil2"  Add Data to an Existing Facility

  HYPERLINK  \l "Add"  Add a Facility

  HYPERLINK  \l "Print"  Review Revisions

  HYPERLINK  \l "Submit1"  Submit Revisions

   HYPERLINK  \l "DataDict"  Term Definitions

Please note that the category-specific files contain all emissions data
for the facilities identified as belonging to a MACT category. Thus,
some of the emissions may be from processes NOT associated with the MACT
category of interest. The column labeled “MACT Code” indicates if
the HAP pollutant emissions are associated with the MACT category of
interest or another MACT category at the facility. For example, if the
MACT code is labeled 0107-2, the emissions are described as being
associated with “Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers & Process
Heaters – gas.” These are shown to provide a complete dataset for
the facility and/or to help the reviewer spot additional processes which
should be assigned to the MACT category.

1.	Application Overview

When this Microsoft Access file opens you are presented with a “Main
Page” containing five buttons:

  HYPERLINK  \l "Summary"  View Summary Data

  HYPERLINK  \l "Revise"  Revise Data

  HYPERLINK  \l "Review"  Review Revisions

  HYPERLINK  \l "Submit1"  Submit Revisions

 5.   Exit Database

After reading these instructions, you should select the “View Summary
Data” button to view summary data before making revisions or adding
any facilities to this file. After reviewing the current data for your
MACT category, you can proceed to the “  HYPERLINK  \l "Revise"
Revise Data ” forms. After making corrections to this file, you should
  HYPERLINK  \l "Print"  review your corrections  and then submit your
revisions to EPA as outlined on the “Submit Revisions” form.

2.	View Summary Data

After selecting and clicking the “View Summary Data” button, the
form displays national level summary data for all pollutants associated
with the MACT category of interest. You can sort the columns in
ascending or descending order if you wish to see the highest or lowest
emissions and/or if you want to sort by pollutant name alphabetically.
This form also provides buttons that allow you to change the aggregation
level (“Options”) of the data and/or filter by pollutant (“Filter
Data”).

a.	Options – These buttons allow you to view summary data at varying
levels of detail. When you click these buttons, new forms open with data
level and filter buttons appropriate to the dataset displayed. These
buttons and their accompanying forms are as follows:

MACT HAP Emissions (View National Data Form) – Discussed above, this
form displays national level summary data for all pollutants associated
with the MACT category of interest. This is the default form that opens
when you select “View Summary Data” on the “Main Page.”

State County MACT Emissions (View State, County, MACT, HAP, and
Emissions Data Form) – All emissions for the MACT category are shown
at the county – pollutant level. This form would allow you, for
example, to find your county and view total emissions by pollutant from
the MACT category. After viewing emissions at the county level, you
might want to view all facilities in the county to determine where high
(or low) emissions values for a given pollutant are originating. To do
this, proceed to the Facility MACT HAP Emissions data level.

Facility MACT HAP Emissions (View Facility, MACT, HAP, and Emissions
Data Form) – Total emissions by pollutant are shown for all processes
at all facilities assigned to this MACT category. The column labeled
“MACT Code” indicates if the HAP pollutant emissions are associated
with the MACT category or another MACT category at the facility. For
example, if the MACT code is labeled 0107-2, the emissions are described
as being associated with “Industrial/Commercial/ Institutional Boilers
& Process Heaters – gas.” These are shown to provide a complete
dataset for the facility and/or to help you spot additional processes
which should be assigned to the MACT category.

After viewing emissions at the facility level, you might want to view
all data associated with that facility to make sure that
latitude/longitudes, stack parameters, Source Classification Codes
(SCC), Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes, North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes, and other descriptive
information are correct. To view this information, select the “All
Data” button.

iv.	All Data (View All Data Form) – Detailed records are shown for all
facilities included in this MACT category. This detail includes process
level HAP emissions, SCCs, stack parameters, latitude/longitudes and
address information.

b.	Filter Data – These buttons allow you to filter the current dataset
by different attributes. The available filters change depending upon the
detail level of the displayed data (e.g., the county level filter is not
available on the national level summary form, but is available at the
State County MACT level). You can choose one filter after another to
progressively narrow down the data to records of interest. For example,
on the State County MACT Emissions level, you can filter by state and
then by pollutant. The filters available on each data level are:

National Data – Pollutant filter.

State County MACT Emissions – Pollutant, state, and county filters.

Facility MACT HAP Emissions – Facility, pollutant, state, county, and
MACT code filters.

All Data – Facility, pollutant, state, county, and MACT code filters.

Filters can be removed by clicking the “Remove Filter” Button.
Clicking “Remove Filter” removes all filters applied and returns the
dataset to its original form.

After viewing emissions at the facility level, proceed to “Revise
Data” on the “Main Page” if there any omissions or errors that
need correction.

3.	Revise Data

When you select “Revise Data” the “Reviewer Information” form
first opens. You must complete this form before continuing. This form
collects contact information on the reviewer:

Name

Organization

Phone Number

Email Address

Please note:  If you suggest changes to or add emissions values you will
need to provide additional documentation for these emission revisions to
the docket. (See Section 6 for more information.)

The “Reviewer Information” form will appear every time you return to
the revised data forms, however, your contact information will be saved
in the drop down list and you can readily select your email address from
the list. The “Facility Selection” form opens and allows the user to
select a facility for revision. The name of the facility and address
information are shown in the selection list as multiple facilities may
have similar names. At this point, you can select one of five actions:
“Revise Data for Selected Facility,” “Add a Facility,” “Add
Data to an Existing Facility,” “Export Facility Data to an Excel
File,” or “Back to Main.” The “Add a Facility” button is
discussed in Section 4; the rest are described below.

Revise Data for Selected Facility – Selecting this button opens a form
which allows you to select the specific data attributes to be revised.
These attributes are:

a.	Revise Emissions Fields – Selecting this option brings up data
fields relevant to the emissions value. Fields that can be revised here
are: start date, end date, routine emissions (tons per year), pollutant
code, and HAP performance level. If an emissions value is changed, the
start date, end date, HAP performance level, control measure
information, and emissions calculation method code must be updated as
well. Because EPA is modeling both short- and long-term risks, you are
also asked to indicate the routine emissions maximum hourly rate (in lbs
per hour), as well as startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) annual
and maximum hourly emissions (and use the comment field to indicate
number of SSM occurrences). For EPA to better understand current control
measures that are in operation, we are requesting that reviewers
indicate the type of control measure associated with each unit. You can
indicate if the process is controlled (check box for Yes), select a
control measure from the drop down list, and provide additional
information in the comment field. If the control measure information is
not provided, the emission process will be considered uncontrolled. You
can also indicate that the HAP emissions value should be deleted, and
provide a reason for this deletion. Please note that you can only enter
data into the revision fields. The remaining fields are locked. When you
are finished making your changes, select “Save Records” at the
bottom of the form to save your revisions and move to another form.

Please note:  If you suggest changes to or add emissions values, you
will need to provide additional documentation for these emission
revisions. (See Section 6 for more information.)

b.	Revise Stack Fields – Selecting this option brings up data fields
relevant to the emissions release point. Fields that can be revised here
are stack height, stack diameter, stack temperature, exit gas velocity,
exit gas flow rate, the emission release point type (stack vs.
fugitive), fugitive length, fugitive width, fugitive angle, latitude and
longitude, and North American Datum. You can also enter a general
comment on the revision. Please note that you can only enter data into
the revision fields. The remaining fields are locked. When you are
finished making your changes, select “Save Records.”

c.	Revise Process Fields – Selecting this option brings up data fields
relevant to the process. Fields that can be revised here are MACT code
and SCC. You can also enter a general comment on the revision. You only
enter data into the revision fields. The remaining fields are locked.
When you are finished making your changes, select “Save Records.”

d.	Revise Facility Information – Selecting this option brings up data
fields that describe the facility. Fields that can be revised here are:
tribal code, county name, facility registry identifier, facility
category code (major or area), facility name, location address, city,
state, and zip code. You can also enter a general comment on the
revision, indicate that the facility should be removed from the NEI if
it has permanently closed and when it closed, or indicate the facility
should be removed from the MACT category. Please note that you can only
enter data into the revision fields. The remaining fields are locked.
When you are finished making your changes, select “Save Records.”

No Revisions – Select this button to indicate you have reviewed the
facility data and have no revisions.  You cannot select this button if
you have made revisions to the facility. After you make this selection,
you will not be able to make revisions to the facility data.

Add Data to an Existing Facility – Selecting the “Add Data to an
Existing Facility” button opens a form which shows all the current HAP
emissions for the selected facility. You should scroll to the last row
to enter any missing pollutant data. All data fields should be filled
in. In addition to providing additional annual emission estimates, you
are also asked to indicate the routine emissions maximum hourly rate (in
lbs per hour), as well as startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM)
annual and maximum hourly emissions (and use the comment field to
indicate number of SSM occurrences).  You can select “RTR11,” Risk
and Technology Review 2011 as the data source. When you are finished
making your changes, select “Save Records.”

Export Facility Data to an Excel File – Selecting this option allows
you to export the facility data to an Excel file if it facilitates your
review of the original NEI facility and emissions data. After clicking
this button, you will be asked to which local directory you would like
to save the file. If you select this option after making revisions, your
revised records will be included.

Other Options – You also have the option of selecting a different
facility, returning to the Main Page, reviewing your changes, or
preparing the file to submit your changes to EPA.

4.	Add a Facility

When you select “Add a Facility” on the “Revise Data” form
button a new form opens with a single blank record. You can add a
facility to this MACT category and enter the HAP emissions and
associated descriptive facility and emission release point information.
This information includes: tribal code; county name; facility category
code (major or area); facility name; location address city, state, and
zip code; SIC code; NAICS code; SCC; MACT code; pollutant; routine,
startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) emissions values and rates (and
number of SSM occurrences); stack parameters; and latitude/longitude.
The reviewer should also enter one set of appropriate identifiers:
facility registry identifier, unit ID, process ID, and emission release
point ID.  Required fields are noted.  If you add emissions for a
process that is not associated with the MACT category, please select the
appropriate MACT code (from the drop down list) or indicate that it is
not a MACT-associated process. When you are finished making your
changes, select “Save Records.”  To create additional emission unit,
process, and HAP emissions records, now select “Add Data to an
Existing Facility” and continue with your data entry.

5.	Review Revisions

When you open the “Review Revisions” form, you can export your
suggested revisions to Microsoft Excel so that you can print and review
them. This form contains five buttons:

1.	View Emissions Revisions;

2.	View Facility Revisions;

3.	Export Revisions to Excel File;

4.	Submit Revisions; and

5.	Back to Main

After selecting options 1 or 2, the corresponding form will open which
will display the selected revisions. The Emissions Revisions form
contains all additions and revisions entered under the   HYPERLINK  \l
"RevEmissions1"  Revise Emissions Fields ,  HYPERLINK  \l "RevProcess2"
Revise Process Fields , and   HYPERLINK  \l "RevStack"  Revise Stack
Fields  forms as described above.  The Facility Revisions form contains
all additions and revisions entered under “  HYPERLINK  \l "AddFacil2"
 Revise Facility Information ” form. You can export these revisions by
clicking the “Export Revisions to Excel file” button. After clicking
this button, you will be asked to which local directory you would like
to save the file. The selected revisions will then be exported to a
Microsoft Excel spreadsheet.

You should print out these spreadsheets, review them, and make
corrections as necessary. To make corrections, return to the appropriate
revision form (as described under   HYPERLINK  \l "Revise"  Revise Data
). Any previously revised data will appear in the revise data forms.

6.	Submit Revisions

Upon completion of all additions and corrections, or acceptance of the
data with no revisions, you need to submit your corrections to EPA.
First, create a new file containing just the changes. To do so, select
the “Submit Revisions” button found on the “Main Page” and on
the revision and review summary data forms. Clicking the “Create
Revisions File” button will create a spreadsheet file that contains
the reviewer’s changes. The file will be assigned a name using the
following convention: XXXX_Revisions_LastName.xls, where XXXX = 4-6
digit MACT code and LastName = reviewer’s last name. You will be
prompted to save the new file to a local directory of your choice. In
addition to submitting the spreadsheet file to the docket, if you
corrected or added emissions values, you should prepare supporting
documentation. This can include source test reports, permit information
and/or computational information such as emission factors and activity
data (throughput). The spreadsheet and supporting documentation must be
submitted manually to one of the addresses listed in the next paragraph.

Submit your revision database, identified by Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505, by one of the following methods:

  HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov"  http://www.regulations.gov :
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.

E-mail:   HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>. Attention Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505.

Mail: U.S. Postal Service, send comments to: EPA Docket Center, EPA West
(Air Docket) Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,  Mailcode 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460.  Please include a total of two copies.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA West (Air
Docket), Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20004.
Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket’s normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.

Instructions:  Direct your comments to Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505. The EPA’s policy is that all comments received
will be included in the public docket without change and may be made
available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to
be confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.  Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or
e-mail.  The www.regulations.gov website is an “anonymous access”
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.

If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet.  If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit.  If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment.  Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.

For additional information about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm"
http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm .  All documents in the docket
are listed in the Federal Docket Management System index at
www.regulations.gov.  Although listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute.  Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form.  Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air and Radiation Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West Building, Room
B-102, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC.  The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays.  The telephone number for the Public Reading
Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the Air and
Radiation Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

7.	Term Definitions

The table below lists and defines all of the data elements listed in the
summary and revision forms found in the database.

Data Element	Definition

City	City where the MACT facility is located

Commenter Email Address	Email address for person providing comments

Commenter General Comment	A general descriptive comment on the revision

Commenter Name	Name of person providing comments

Commenter Organization	Commenter's affiliation - state/local/agency,
trade association, company, etc.

Commenter Phone Number	Phone number for person providing comments

Control Measure In Place	Are control measures in place? (Yes or No)

Control Measure 	Select control measure from list provided, and briefly
describe the control measure

County Name	County name for MACT facility

Data  Source Description	Descriptive text associated with data source
code

Data Source Code	Code indicating source of emissions estimate (state,
EPA, TRI, etc.). All codes are defined in lookup tables at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html"
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html .

Delete	Indicate here if the facility or record should be deleted

Delete Comment	Describes the reason for deletion

Emission Calculation Method Code For Revised Emissions	Code description
of the method used to derive emissions. For example, CEM, material
balance, stack test, etc.

Emission Release Point ID	State/local/tribal ID for point/location where
emissions are released to ambient air

Emission Release Point Type	The code for physical configuration of the
release point, i.e. vertical, fugitive, etc.

Emission Release Point Type Description	Descriptive text for
EmissionReleasePointType code

Emission Type	Code describing temporal designation of emissions
reported, i.e., entire period, average weekday, etc.

Emission Unit ID	Unique ID reported consistently over time by
state/local/tribal agency

Emissions (TPY)	Numeric value of routine emissions in tons/year

End Date	End date of the period in which reported emissions occur, e.g.,
20051231 = December 31, 2005

EPA Region	EPA Regional Code. All codes are defined in lookup tables at
 HYPERLINK "http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html"
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html .

Exit Gas Flow Rate	Numeric value of stack gas flow rate in actual cubic
feet per second

Exit Gas Temperature	The temperature of an exit gas stream (degree
Fahrenheit)

Exit Gas Velocity	The velocity of an exit gas stream (feet per second)

Facility Category Desc	Definition associated with Facility Category Code

Facility Category	Code indicating if HAP emitting facility is major or
area. All codes are defined in lookup tables at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html"
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html .

Facility Name	The name of the facility of the MACT facility

Facility Registry Identifier	The ID number assigned by the EPA Facility
Registry System. FRS IDs can be found at:   HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/enviro/html/facility.html"
http://www.epa.gov/enviro/html/facility.html .

FIPS	5 digit code assigned to state and county. All codes are defined in
lookup tables at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html"
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html .

Fugitive Width (N-S) (ft)	Dimension of the source in the north-south
(y-) direction, commonly referred to as width

Fugitive Angle (degrees)	Release angle (clockwise from true North);
orientation of the y-dimension relative to true North, measured positive
for clockwise starting at 0 degrees (maximum 89 degrees); will assume 0
degrees if it is not provided in data submittal

Fugitive Length (E-W) (ft)	Dimension of the source in the east-west (x-)
direction, commonly referred to as length

HAP Category Name	Broader grouping to which an individual chemical
compound is assigned to by EPA. For example, “lead and compounds”
contains all pollutants containing lead.

HAP Emissions Performance Level	Code that represents the performance
level, or operating scenario, for the HAP emissions reported. Actual,
allowable, maximum and potential.

HAP Emissions Performance Level Description	Descriptive text associated
with code for HAP Performance Level

Latitude (decimal degrees)	Latitude measure in decimal degrees of the
angular distance on a meridian north or south of the equator. Positive
(+) data point for N America. Include (+) sign, Ex. +78.123456. For
point sources this represents the center of the source; for fugitive
sources this is the southwest corner if the fugitive angle is zero, or
the western most corner if the fugitive angle is greater than zero.

Location Address	Physical street address for MACT facility

Location Default Flag	Code that indicates source of locational
coordinates. All codes are defined in lookup tables at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html"
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html . For example,
SITEAVG indicates site average.

Longitude (decimal degrees)	Longitude measure in decimal degrees of the
angular distance on a meridian east or west of the prime meridian.
Negative (-) data point for N America. Include (-) sign, Ex.
-123.234561. For point sources this represents the center of the source;
for fugitive sources this is the southwest corner if the fugitive angle
is zero, or the western most corner if the fugitive angle is greater
than zero.

MACT Code	Code assigned to Maximum Achievable Control Technology
regulated sources. Identifies one or more similar processes that cause
hazardous air pollutant emissions that are subject to a MACT
determination.

MACT Source Category	Descriptive text associated with MACT code

MACT Compliance Status	Describes Major/Area classification and status
under CAAA Sections 112&129. Codes and definitions are as follows:

01 – Major Source (>10/25 tpy), compliance date has not yet occurred.

02 – Major Source (>10/25 tpy), compliance date has occurred.

03 – Area Source (<10/25tpy) category listed in, and subject to,
Section 112 &129 standards.

04 – Area Source (<10/25tpy) category listed in, but not subject to,
Section 112 &129 standards as a synthetic minor.

05 – Area Source (<10/25tpy) category listed in, but not subject to,
Section 112 &129 standards as true area or natural minor source.

06 – Rule only affects major sources; area may be flagged.

07 – Rule only covers certain HAPs; all HAPs flagged.

MACT flag	Describes how MACT Code was assigned. Codes are as follows:

- EFIG-BASED – MACT Code assigned by U.S. EPA Emission Factor and
Inventory Group (emissions data provided by various sources);

- ESD-BASED – MACT Code assigned by U.S. EPA Emission Standards
Division (ESD) (emissions data usually provided by ESD);

- FACILLIST-* MACT code assigned to facilities listed on MACT category
lists compiled by EPA (emissions data provided by various sources);

- NAICS-DEFAULT – MACT Code assigned based on NAICS code;

- SCC-DEFAULT – MACT Code assigned based on SCC;

- SIC-DEFAULT – MACT Code assigned based on SIC code;

- STATE-BASED – MACT Code assigned by state agency.

Malfunction Emissions (TPY)	Emissions that occurred during periods of
malfunction.

Malfunction  Emissions Max Hourly Rate (lbs per hour)	Maximum hourly
emission rate for emissions that occurred during periods of malfunction.

NAICS Code	North American Industry Classification Code. An industry
classification system, NAICS is erected on a production-oriented
conceptual framework that groups establishments into industries
according to similarity in the process used to produce goods or
services.

NEI Site ID	Unique identifier assigned by EPA to NEI Facility

North American Datum	North American Datum (NAD) for longitude and
latitude coordinates (NAD27 or NAD83). If left blank NAD83 is assumed.

Pollutant_Code_Desc	Descriptive text associated with pollutant code

Pollutant Code	Code assigned by EPA to individual pollutants. All codes
are defined in lookup tables at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html"
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html .

Process ID	Unique ID reported consistently over time by state/local/
tribal agency

REVISED City	Enter revised city name here

REVISED County Name	Enter revised county name here

REVISED Emission Release Point Type	Enter revised
EmissionReleasePointType here

REVISED Emissions (TPY)	Enter revised routine emissions value here

REVISED End Date	Enter revised End Date here

REVISED Exit Gas Flow Rate (cuft/sec)	Enter revised Exit Gas Flowrate
here

REVISED Exit Gas Temperature (F)	Enter revised Exit Gas Temperature here

REVISED Exit Gas Velocity (ft/sec)	Enter revised Exit Gas Velocity here

REVISED Facility Category Code	Enter revised Facility Category Code here

REVISED Facility Name	Enter revised Facility Name here

REVISED Facility Registry Identifier	Enter revised Facility Registry
Identifier here

REVISED HAP Emissions Performance Level	Enter revised HAP Emissions
Performance Level here

REVISED Latitude (decimal degrees)	Enter revised Latitude here

REVISED Location Address	Enter revised Location Address here

REVISED Longitude (decimal degrees)	Enter revised Longitude here

REVISED MACT Code	Enter revised MACT Code here

REVISED Pollutant Code	Enter revised Pollutant Code here

REVISED SCC	Enter revised SCC Code here

REVISED Stack Diameter (ft)	Enter revised Stack Diameter here

REVISED Stack Height (ft)	Enter revised Stack Height here

REVISED Start Date	Enter revised Start Date here

REVISED State	Enter revised State here

REVISED Tribal Code	Enter revised Tribal Code here

REVISED Zip Code	Enter revised Zip Code here

Routine Emissions Max Hourly Rate (lbs per hour)	Maximum hourly emission
rate for routine emissions.

SCC	Source Classification Code. All codes are defined in lookup tables
at   HYPERLINK "http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html"
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html .

SCC Description	Descriptive text associated with SCC code

SIC Code	Standard Industrial Classification code. The Standard
Industrial Classification (abbreviated 'SIC') was a United States
government system for classifying industries by a four-digit code.
Established in the 1930s, it is being supplanted by the six-digit NAICS

SIC Code Description	Descriptive text associated with SIC Code

Stack Default Flag	The stack default code is a 5-digit code that
indicates if and how the stack parameters were defaulted. Each digit
represents a stack parameter in the following order:  stack height, exit
gas temperature, stack diameter, exit gas velocity, and exit gas
flowrate. The individual digits in the string indicate the source of the
defaulted parameters: 0= Original Value, 1 = SCC Default, 2 = SIC
Default, 3 = National Default, 4 = Calculated Value, 5 = MACT Default,
6 = State Revision, 8 = CAMD Value. Thus, 22222 means all 5 parameters
were defaulted using SIC Default List.

Stack Default Flag Description	Descriptive text associated with
StackDefaultFlag

Stack Diameter	The diameter (in feet) of a stack

Stack Height	The height (in feet) of a stack

Start Date	Start date of the period in which reported emissions occur,
e.g., 20050101 = January 1, 2005

Startup Emissions (TPY)	Emissions that occurred during startup periods.

Startup Emissions Max Hourly Rate (lbs per hour)	Maximum hourly emission
rate for startup period emissions.

State	State where MACT facility is located

State Abbreviation	Two-character alphabetical code for state

State County FIPs	5 digit code assigned to state and county. All codes
are defined in lookup tables at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html"
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html

State Facility Identifier	Unique ID number used by a state/local/tribal
agency to identify a facility

Shutdown Emissions (TPY)	Emissions that occurred during shutdown
periods.

Shutdown Emissions Max Hourly Rate (lbs per hour)	Maximum hourly
emission rate for shutdown period emissions.

Tribal Code	Code that represent American Indian tribes and Alaskan
Native entities. All codes are defined in lookup tables at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html"
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2005inventory.html

Tribe Name	Tribal name

Year Closed	Indicate the year closed if the facility is no longer in
operation (permanently closed)

Zip Code	Zip Code for the MACT facility

  Underlined text in this document indicates hyperlinks to text both
inside and outside the document.

  Please note: this directory should already exist on your PC. The
program will not create new subdirectories.

  Please note: this directory should already exist on your PC. The
program will not create new subdirectories.

 PAGE

 PAGE   11

07/25/11


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 121 (Monday, June 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28846-28847]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13270]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1510-018]

Kaukauna Utilities; Notice Soliciting Scoping Comments

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: New Major License.
    b. Project No.: P-1510-018.
    c. Date filed: March 24, 2017.
    d. Applicant: Kaukauna Utilities.
    e. Name of Project: Kaukauna City Plant Hydropower Project.
    f. Location: On the Fox River in Outagamie County, Wisconsin. There
are no federal or tribal lands within the project boundary.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Mike Pedersen, Kaukauna Utilities, 777
Island Street, P.O. Box 1777, Kaukauna, WI 54130;<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Erin Kimsey,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing scoping comments: August 21, 2017.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
scoping comments using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief
comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the
eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You
must include your name and contact information at the end of your
comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should include
docket number P-1510-018.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission

relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities
of a particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the
document on that resource agency.
    k. This application is not ready for environmental analysis at this
time.
    l. The existing Kaukauna City Plant Hydroelectric Project consists
of: (1) A 3,527-foot-long, 14-foot-high dam that includes: (a) A 930-
foot-long, 14-foot-high rubble masonry retaining wall section (left
forebay dam) with a remnant concrete headwall structure and a trash
sluice; (b) a 92-foot-long, 47.5-foot-high concrete intake and
powerhouse section; (c) a 365-foot-long, 20-foot-high rubble masonry
retaining wall section (right forebay dam) with a masonry abutment
section and a concrete gravity section with a trash sluice; (d) a 66-
foot-long gated spillway section with two 30-foot-wide, 8.8-foot-high
spillway gates; and (e) a 2,074-foot-long, 10-foot-high overflow
spillway section that includes a 1,305-foot-long concrete ogee section,
a 75-foot-long natural rock section, a 125-foot-long concrete gravity
section, and a 569-foot-long concrete gravity section; (2) a 19-acre
1.5-mile-long impoundment with a normal maximum elevation of 629.0
above mean seal level; (3) an intake structure with two head gates and
two 25-foot-high, 88-foot-long trashracks with 5 inch clear-bar
spacing; (4) a 92-foot-long, 47.5-foot-high concrete and brick
powerhouse containing two 2.4-megawatt (MW) turbine-generator units for
a total capacity of 4.8 MW; (5) a 440-foot-wide, 49-foot-deep, 1,200-
foot-long excavated tailrace; (6) two 68-foot-long, 2.4-kilovolt
generator leads that connect the turbine-generator units to the
regional distribution line; and (7) appurtenant facilities.
    Kaukauna Utilities operates the project in a run-of-river mode with
an annual average generation of approximately 29,704 megawatt-hours.
Kaukauna Utilities is not proposing any new project facilities or
changes in project operation.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to address the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support. A copy is available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item h above.
    n. You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    o. Scoping Process
    The Commission staff intends to prepare a single Environmental
Assessment (EA) for the Kaukauna City Plant Hydroelectric Project in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. The EA will
consider both site-specific and cumulative environmental impacts and
reasonable alternatives to the proposed action.
    Commission staff does not propose to conduct any on-site scoping
meetings at this time. Instead, we are soliciting comments,
recommendations, and information, on Scoping Document 1 (SD1) issued on
June 20, 2017.
    Copies of SD1 outlining the subject areas to be addressed in the EA
were distributed to the parties on the Commission's mailing list and
the applicant's distribution list. Copies of SD1 may be viewed on the
web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or
for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: June 20, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-13270 Filed 6-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 11, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 46)]
[Notices]
[Page 10566]
[DOCID:fr11mr09-53]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filing

February 27, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP09-366-001.
    Applicants: Mississippi Canyon Gas Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Mississippi Canyon Gas Pipeline, LLC submits
Substitute First Revised Sheet No 85 to FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised
Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 02/24/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090225-0217.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 9, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-388-000.
    Applicants: Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC submits Fifth
Revised Sheet No 15 to FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No 1.
    Filed Date: 02/24/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090225-0216.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 9, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-389-000.
    Applicants: Steckman Ridge, LP.
    Description: Steckman Ridge, LP submits Original Sheet 1 et al to
FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume 1 re Steckman Ridge Storage Project,
to be effective 4/1/09.
    Filed Date: 02/24/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090225-0218.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 9, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-390-000.
    Applicants: Discovery Gas Transmission LLC.
    Description: Discovery Gas Transmission LLC submits Sixteenth
Revised Sheet No. 20 to its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume 1, to be
effective 4/1/09.
    Filed Date: 02/25/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090226-0208.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 9, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-391-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC submits Ninety-First
Revised Sheet No. 25 et al. to FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume
No. 1, to be effective 4/1/09.
    Filed Date: 02/25/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090226-0207.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 9, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-392-000.
    Applicants: Central Kentucky Transmission Company.
    Description: Central Kentucky Transmission Co submits Seventh
Revised Sheet No. 6 to FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, to be
effective 4/1/09.
    Filed Date: 02/25/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090226-0205.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 9, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-393-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC submits Nineteenth
Revised Sheet No. 644 to FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1,
to be effective 4/1/09.
    Filed Date: 02/25/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090226-0206.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 9, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-394-000.
    Applicants: KO Transmission Company.
    Description: KO Transmission Company submits First Revised Sheet 7
et al. to its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 02/25/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090226-0200.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 9, 2009.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-5149 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 316-319]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33746]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-66065; File Nos. SR-BATS-2011-038; SR-BYX-2011-025; SR-
BX-2011-068; SR-CBOE-2011-087; SR-C2-2011-024; SR-CHX-2011-30; SR-EDGA-
2011-31; SR-EDGX-2011-30; SR-FINRA-2011-054; SR-ISE-2011-61; SR-NASDAQ-
2011-131; SR-NSX-2011-11; SR-NYSE-2011-48; SR-NYSEAmex-2011-73; SR-
NYSEArca-2011-68; SR-Phlx-2011-129]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; BATS Y-
Exchange, Inc.; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; Chicago Stock
Exchange, Inc.; EDGA Exchange, Inc.; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; International Securities Exchange
LLC; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; New York Stock Exchange LLC; NYSE
Amex LLC; NYSE Arca, Inc.; National Stock Exchange, Inc.; NASDAQ OMX
PHLX LLC; Order Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To
Disapprove Proposed Rule Changes Relating to Trading Halts Due to
Extraordinary Market Volatility

December 28, 2011.

I. Introduction

    On September 27, 2011, each of BATS Exchange, Inc. (``BATS''), BATS
Y-Exchange, Inc. (``BYX''), NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX''), Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated (``CBOE''), C2 Options Exchange,
Incorporated (``C2''), Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX''), EDGA
Exchange, Inc. (``EDGA''), EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX''), Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA''), International
Securities

Exchange LLC (``ISE''), The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq''),
National Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NSX''), New York Stock Exchange LLC
(``NYSE''), NYSE Amex LLC (``NYSE Amex''), NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE
Arca''), and NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'') (collectively, the
``SROs'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\
proposed rule changes (the ``SRO Proposals'') to amend certain of their
respective rules relating to trading halts due to extraordinary market
volatility. The SRO Proposals were published for comment in the Federal
Register on October 4, 2011.\3\ The Commission received seven comment
letters on the SRO Proposals.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 65437 (September
28, 2011), 76 FR 61466 (October 4, 2011); 65428 (September 28,
2011), 76 FR 61453 (October 4, 2011); 65429 (September 28, 2011), 76
FR 61432 (October 4, 2011); 65433 (September 28, 2011), 76 FR 61453
(October 4, 2011); 65438 (September 28, 2011), 76 FR 61447 (October
4, 2011); 65426 (September 28, 2011), 76 FR 61460 (October 4, 2011);
65431 (September 28, 2011), 76 FR 61425 (May 12, 2011); 65440
(September 28, 2011), 76 FR 61444 (October 4, 2011); 65430
(September 28, 2011), 76 FR 61429 (October 4, 2011); 65425
(September 28, 2011), 76 FR 61438 (October 4, 2011); 65435 (May 6,
2011), 76 FR 61416 (October 4, 2011); 65436 (September 28, 2011), 76
FR 61450 (October 4, 2011); 65427 (September 28, 2011), 76 FR 61457
(October 4, 2011); 65432 (September 28, 2011), 76 FR 61422 (October
4, 2011); 65439 (September 28, 2011), 76 FR 61463 (October 4, 2011);
65434 (September 28, 2011), 76 FR 61419 (October 4, 2011)
(collectively, the ``Notices'').
    \4\ See Letter to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Commission,
from Ann L. Vlcek, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel,
the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, dated
October 27, 2011 (``SIFMA Letter''); Letter to Commission, from
James J. Angel, Ph.D., CFA, Associate Professor of Finance,
Georgetown University, McDonough School of Business, dated October
25, 2011 (``Angel Letter''); Letter to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Commission, from Craig S. Donohue, CME Group, Inc., dated
October 25, 2011 (``CME Group Letter''); Letter to Elizabeth M.
Murphy, Secretary, Commission, from Commissioner Bart Chilton,
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, dated October 25, 2011
(``Commissioner Chilton Letter''); Letter to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Commission, from Richard H. Baker, President and CEO,
Managed Funds Association, dated October 25, 2011 (``MFA Letter'');
Letter from Suzanne H. Shatto, dated October 20, 2011; Letter from
Mark Roszak, dated October 4, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 17, 2011, the Commission extended the time period in
which to either approve the SRO Proposals, disapprove the SRO
Proposals, or to institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove the SRO Proposals, to December 30, 2011.\5\ This order
institutes proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act to
determine whether to disapprove the SRO Proposals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65770, 76 FR 72492
(November 23, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposals

    In the SRO Proposals, the exchanges and FINRA propose to revise the
existing market-wide circuit breakers, which halt trading in all NMS
securities in the event of extraordinary market volatility, in order to
make them more meaningful in today's high-speed electronic markets. In
so doing, the exchanges and FINRA took into account the events of May
6, 2010, where the markets experienced excessive volatility in a short
period of time, as well as the recommendations of the Joint CFTC-SEC
Advisory Committee on Emerging Regulatory Issues.
    The existing market-wide circuit breakers provide for specified
trading halts following certain ``Level 1,'' ``Level 2,'' and ``Level
3'' market declines.\6\ The values of Levels 1, 2 and 3 are calculated
at the beginning of each calendar quarter, using 10%, 20% and 30%,
respectively, of the average closing value of the Dow Jones Industrial
Average (``DJIA'') for the month prior to the beginning of the
quarter.\7\ The existing Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 circuit breakers
operate as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See NYSE Rule 80B.
    \7\ Each percentage calculation is rounded to the nearest 50
points, and remains in effect until the next quarterly calculation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Level 1 Halt

    Before 2 p.m.--one hour;
    At or after 2 p.m. but before 2:30 p.m.--30 minutes;
    At or after 2:30 p.m.--trading shall continue, unless there is a
Level 2 Halt.

Level 2 Halt

    Before 1 p.m.--two hours;
    At or after 1 p.m. but before 2 p.m.--one hour;
    At or after 2 p.m.--trading shall halt and not resume for the rest
of the day.

Level 3 Halt

    At any time--trading shall halt and not resume for the rest of the
day.
    As described in detail in the Notices, the SRO Proposals, among
other things, would: (i) Replace the DJIA with the S&P 500[supreg]
Index (``S&P 500'') as the reference index; (ii) recalculate the values
of the triggers daily instead of each calendar quarter; (iii) reduce
the 10%, 20%, and 30% market decline trigger percentages to 7%, 13%,
and 20%; (iv) shorten the length of the trading halts associated with
each market decline level; and (v) modify the times when a trading halt
may be triggered. The proposed Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 circuit
breakers would operate as follows:

Level 1 Halt

    Before 3:25 p.m.--15 minutes;
    At or after 3:25 p.m.--trading shall continue, unless there is a
Level 3 halt.

Level 2 Halt

    Before 3:25 p.m.--15 minutes;
    At or after 3:25 p.m.--trading shall continue, unless there is a
Level 3 halt.

Level 3 Halt

    At any time--trading shall halt and not resume for the rest of the
day.

III. Limit Up-Limit Down Plan

    Separately, there currently is pending before the Commission a
proposal by the equities exchanges and FINRA to establish a new
mechanism to address extraordinary market volatility in individual
securities, pursuant to a national market system plan under Rule 608 of
Regulation NMS to address extraordinary market volatility (the National
Market System Plan to Address Extraordinary Market Volatility, or, the
``Limit Up-Limit Down Plan'').\8\ The new Limit Up-Limit Down Plan,
which would replace the existing single-stock circuit breaker
mechanism,\9\ would prevent trades in individual securities from
occurring outside of a specified price band, and would be coupled with
a trading pause mechanism to accommodate more fundamental price moves.
In essence, a security would enter a ``limit state'' if its price moves
a certain percentage--generally 5%, 10% or 20%, depending on the stock
and the time of day--over a 5-minute period. If the market does not
naturally exit the limit state within 15 seconds, there would be a
five-minute trading pause. The Commission currently is reviewing the
comments received.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64547 (May 25,
2011), 76 FR 31647 (June 1, 2011).
    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64735 (June 23,
2011), 76 FR 38243 (June 29, 2011) (order approving the current
single-stock circuit breaker mechanism). The single-stock circuit
breaker mechanism, which was approved as a pilot program, is
currently scheduled to expire on January 31, 2012. See, e.g.,
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65090 (August 10, 2011), 76 FR
50790 (August 16, 2011) (SR-NYSE-2011-40).
    \10\ The final date for Commission action on the Limit Up-Limit
Down Plan is February 29, 2012 unless the Participants consent to a
further extension. See Letter from Janet M. McGinness, Senior Vice
President, Legal and Corporate Secretary, NYSE Euronext, to
Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Commission, dated November 18, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed below, the Commission, in the Notices for the SRO
Proposals, specifically requested comment on how the proposed changes
to the market-wide circuit breakers would interact

with the limit up/limit down mechanism for individual securities, if
approved, and several commenters expressed views on this issue.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Commissioner Chilton Letter, CME Group Letter, SIFMA
Letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Comment Letters

    The Commission received seven comment letters on the SRO
Proposals.\12\ Several commenters expressed concern that the Level II
circuit breaker would not apply after 3:25 p.m.\13\ As explained in the
Notices, the SROs adopted this approach to avoid disrupting the normal
4 p.m. market close. The Commission, however, specifically solicited
comment on whether some provision should be made to end the regular
trading session if a market decline suddenly occurs after 3:25 p.m.,
even if the decline is less than 20%. These commenters believed that
the proposal would potentially leave the market vulnerable to a severe
decline that occurs late in the trading day, and instead suggested that
a Level II circuit breaker triggered at or after 3:25 p.m. halt trading
for the remainder of the trading session.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See supra note 4.
    \13\ See CME Group Letter, Commissioner Chilton Letter, and MFA
Letter.
    \14\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission also specifically requested comment on how the
proposed changes would interact with the single-stock circuit breaker
pilot program or, if approved, the proposed limit up/limit down
mechanism for individual securities. The Commission further asked
whether the market-wide circuit breaker should be triggered if a
sufficient number of single-stock circuit breakers or price limits are
triggered. One commenter believed that the market-wide circuit breaker
should be triggered if a sufficient number of single-stock circuit
breakers or price limits are triggered, given the potential
difficulties of accurately calculating the value of the S&P 500 Index
in such circumstances.\15\ Two other commenters also expressed concern
about the interaction of market-wide circuit breakers and single-stock
circuit breakers, and the impact that might have on index calculations,
particularly in macro-market events.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See SIFMA Letter. SIFMA also believed it was critical to
coordinate the market-wide circuit breakers with the options and
futures markets.
    \16\ See CME Group Letter and Commissioner Chilton Letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Two commenters also expressed views on how market centers should
treat pending orders in the event a market-wide circuit breaker is
triggered. One commenter believed that orders pending with a market
center at the time of a Level I or Level II circuit breaker should
remain queued by the market center during the halt and be eligible for
execution after the halt.\17\ However, in the event of a Level III
circuit breaker, that commenter was of the view that all pending orders
should be cancelled, since trading will cease for the remainder of the
day. Another commenter generally took the position that the SROs should
not cancel pending orders during a trading halt, in order to preserve
the queue priority of market participants.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See SIFMA Letter.
    \18\ See CME Group Letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission sought comment on whether a provision should be made
for a closing auction in the event of a Level III circuit breaker
decline. One commenter responded that allowing a closing auction under
these extreme circumstances would risk greater market dislocations, and
therefore was unadvisable,\19\ but another believed there should be a
normal closing process so that, among other things, mutual fund prices
are properly determined.\20\ The Commission also sought comment on
whether the primary market should have a longer period (e.g. 30
minutes) to re-open trading following a Level II circuit breaker
decline. One commenter responded that trading halts should be as short
as operationally practicable, and was of the view that the 15-minute
trading halt remained appropriate in this circumstance.\21\ Finally,
one commenter questioned whether the Level 1 circuit breaker should be
narrowed from 10% to 7%.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Id.
    \20\ See Angel Letter.
    \21\ See CME Letter.
    \22\ See Angel Letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Proceedings To Determine Whether To Disapprove SR-BATS-2011-038; SR-
BYX-2011-025; SR-BX-2011-068; SR-CBOE-2011-087; SR-C2-2011-024; SR-CHX-
2011-30; SR-EDGA-2011-31; SR-EDGX-2011-30; SR-FINRA-2011-054; SR-ISE-
2011-61; SR-NASDAQ-2011-131; SR-NSX-2011-11; SR-NYSE-2011-48; SR-
NYSEAmex-2011-73; SR-NYSEArca-2011-68; SR-Phlx-2011-129 and Grounds for
Disapproval Under Consideration

    The Commission is instituting proceedings pursuant to Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act to determine whether the SRO Proposals should be
disapproved. Institution of such proceedings is appropriate at this
time in view of the legal and policy issues raised by the SRO Proposals
that are discussed below. Institution of disapproval proceedings does
not indicate that the Commission has reached any conclusions with
respect to any of the issues involved. Rather, as described in greater
detail below, the Commission seeks and encourages interested persons to
provide additional comment on the SRO Proposals.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B), the Commission is providing notice
of the grounds for disapproval under consideration. In particular,
Sections 6(b)(5) and 15A(b)(6) of the Act \23\ require that the rules
of an exchange and FINRA, respectively, be designed, among other
things, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The SRO Proposals would update the market-wide circuit breakers by,
among other things, reducing the market decline percentage thresholds
necessary to trigger a circuit breaker, shortening the duration of the
resulting trading halts, and changing the reference index used to
measure a market decline. The market-wide circuit breakers were not
triggered during the severe market disruption of May 6, 2010, which led
the exchanges and FINRA in consultation with Commission staff to assess
whether the circuit breakers needed to be modified or updated in light
of today's market structure. In addition, the Joint CFTC-SEC Advisory
Committee on Emerging Regulatory Issues recommended that the SEC and
CFTC review the current operation of the market-wide circuit breakers,
and consider appropriate modifications.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See Report of the Staffs of the CFTC and SEC to the Joint
Advisory Committee on Emerging Regulatory Issues, ``Findings
Regarding the Market Events of May 6, 2010,'' dated September 30,
2010 at 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed above, there is currently pending before the
Commission a proposal by the equities exchanges and FINRA to establish
the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan, which would create a new mechanism to
address extraordinary market volatility in individual securities.
Several commenters on the SRO Proposals stressed the need to consider
the SRO Proposals together with the proposed Limit Up-Limit Down Plan,
given the potential interaction between the mechanisms for moderating
volatility in individual securities and those for moderating volatility
market-wide. In addition, commenters

expressed some concerns with the details of the SRO Proposals,
including whether only the Level III circuit breaker should halt
trading after 3:25 p.m. and whether the market-wide circuit breakers
should be triggered if a significant number of volatility moderators
for individual securities are triggered.
    The Commission shares the desire of the exchanges and FINRA to
appropriately update the market-wide circuit breakers in light of the
current market structure and the lessons learned from the events of May
6, 2010. Because of the importance of both the market-wide and
individual security volatility moderators to the maintenance of fair
and orderly markets and the protection of investors, however, the
Commission believes the SRO Proposals should be considered together
with the proposed Limit Up-Limit Down Plan, to help assure these
mechanisms interact appropriately with one another, and that details of
the market-wide circuit breakers are fully evaluated. Accordingly, in
light of the pending proposal to establish the Limit Up-Limit Down
Plan, and the concerns raised by commenters, the Commission believes
that questions remain as to whether the SRO Proposals are consistent
with the requirements of Sections 6(b)(5) and 15A(b)(6) of the Act,
including whether the proposed market-wide circuit breakers would
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a national market
system, or protect investors and the public interest.

VI. Solicitation of Comments

    The Commission requests that interested persons provide written
submissions of their views, data and arguments with respect to the
concerns identified above, as well as any others they may have with the
SRO Proposals. In particular, the Commission invites the written views
of interested persons concerning whether the SRO Proposals are
inconsistent with Section 6(b)(5), Section 15A(b)(6), or any other
provision of the Act, or the rules and regulation thereunder. Although
there do not appear to be any issues relevant to approval or
disapproval which would be facilitated by an oral presentation of
views, data, and arguments, the Commission will consider, pursuant to
Rule 19b-4, any request for an opportunity to make an oral
presentation.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, as amended by the Securities
Act Amendments of 1975, Public Law 94-29 (June 4, 1975), grants the
Commission flexibility to determine what type of proceeding--either
oral or notice and opportunity for written comments--is appropriate
for consideration of a particular proposal by a self-regulatory
organization. See Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Senate Comm. on
Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs, S. Rep. No. 75, 94th Cong., 1st
Sess. 30 (1975).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments regarding whether the SRO Proposals should be disapproved by
January 25, 2012. Any person who wishes to file a rebuttal to any other
person's submission must file that rebuttal by February 8, 2012.
    Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Numbers SR-BATS-2011-038; SR-BYX-2011-025; SR-BX-2011-068; SR-
CBOE-2011-087; SR-C2-2011-024; SR-CHX-2011-30; SR-EDGA-2011-31; SR-
EDGX-2011-30; SR-FINRA-2011-054; SR-ISE-2011-61; SR-NASDAQ-2011-131;
SR-NSX-2011-11; SR-NYSE-2011-48; SR-NYSEAmex-2011-73; SR-NYSEArca-2011-
68; SR-Phlx-2011-129 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Numbers SR-BATS-2011-038; SR-BYX-
2011-025; SR-BX-2011-068; SR-CBOE-2011-087; SR-C2-2011-024; SR-CHX-
2011-30; SR-EDGA-2011-31; SR-EDGX-2011-30; SR-FINRA-2011-054; SR-ISE-
2011-61; SR-NASDAQ-2011-131; SR-NSX-2011-11; SR-NYSE-2011-48; SR-
NYSEAmex-2011-73; SR-NYSEArca-2011-68; SR-Phlx-2011-129. These file
numbers should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the SRO Proposals that are filed
with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the SRO
Proposals between the Commission and any person, other than those that
may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5
U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of such filings also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchanges and FINRA. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Numbers SR-BATS-2011-038; SR-BYX-2011-
025; SR-BX-2011-068; SR-CBOE-2011-087; SR-C2-2011-024; SR-CHX-2011-30;
SR-EDGA-2011-31; SR-EDGX-2011-30; SR-FINRA-2011-054; SR-ISE-2011-61;
SR-NASDAQ-2011-131; SR-NSX-2011-11; SR-NYSE-2011-48; SR-NYSEAmex-2011-
73; SR-NYSEArca-2011-68; SR-Phlx-2011-129 and should be submitted on or
before January 25, 2012. Rebuttal comments should be submitted by
February 8, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-33746 Filed 1-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: October 30, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 211)]
[Notices]
[Page 64658]
[DOCID:fr30oc08-87]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory
Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management
Advisory Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory
Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held December 4, 2008, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Holiday Inn Capitol,
Columbia II Ballroom, 550 C Street, SW., Corner of 6th & C Streets,
SW., Washington, DC 20024. (Via Metro: L'Enfant Plaza Station, Use 7th
& Maryland Exit).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW.,
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (202)
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given for the Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee
meeting. The agenda will include:
     Opening Plenary (Welcome and Introductions).
     Assessment of New York 77 Initiatives.
     FAA Airspace Management Program Review.
     NextGen Integration and Implementation.
     Closing Plenary (Other Business, Establish 2009 Meeting
Schedule, ATMAC Member Discussion, Adjourn).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the ``FOR FUTHER INFORMATION CONTACT'' section. Members of the public
may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 24, 2008.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E8-25939 Filed 10-29-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 146 (Wednesday, July 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44199-44201]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17958]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2011-0057]

Excavations (Design of Cave-In Protection Systems); Extension of
the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information
Collection (Paperwork) Requirements

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comments concerning its proposal to
extend OMB approval of the information collection requirements
contained in the Standard on Excavations (Design of Cave-in Protection
Systems) (29 CFR part 1926, subpart P).

DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by
September 29, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting
comments.
    Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
    Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service:
When using this method, you must submit a copy of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, OSHA Docket No. OSHA-2011-0057,
U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210. Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger, and courier
service) are accepted during the Department of Labor's and Docket
Office's normal business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and the
OSHA docket number (OSHA-2011-0057) for the Information Collection
Request (ICR). All comments, including any personal information you
provide, are placed in the public docket without change, and may be
made available online at http://www.regulations.gov. For further
information on submitting comments see the ``Public Participation''
heading in the section of this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the

docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at
the address above. All documents in the docket (including this Federal
Register notice) are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index;
however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly
available to read or download from the Web site. All submissions,
including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and
copying at the OSHA Docket Office. You may also contact Michael Buchet
at the address below to obtain a copy of the ICR.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Buchet, Directorate of
Construction, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-3468, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 693-
2020.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information
collection requirements in accord with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (PRA-95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that
information is in the desired format, reporting burden (time and costs)
is minimal, collection instruments are clearly understood, and OSHA's
estimate of the information collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651
et seq.) authorizes information collection by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the Act or for developing information
regarding the causes and prevention of occupational injuries,
illnesses, and accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also requires
that OSHA obtain such information with minimum burden upon employers,
especially those operating small businesses, and to reduce to the
maximum extent feasible unnecessary duplication of efforts in obtaining
information (29 U.S.C. 657).
    Paragraphs (b) and (c) of Sec.  1926.652 (``Requirements for
Protective Systems''; the ``Standard'') contain paperwork requirements
that impose burden hours or costs on employers. These paragraphs
require employers to use protective systems to prevent cave-ins during
excavation work; these systems include sloping the side of the trench,
benching the soil away from the excavation, or using a support system
or shield (such as a trench box). The Standard specifies allowable
configurations and slopes for excavations, and provides appendices to
assist employers in designing protective systems. However, paragraphs
(b)(3) and (b)(4) of the Standard permit employers to design sloping or
benching systems based on tabulated data (Option 3), or to use a design
approved by a registered professional engineer (Option 4).
    Under Option 3, employers must provide the tabulated data in a
written form that also identifies the registered professional engineer
who approved the data and the parameters used to select the sloping or
benching system drawn from the data, as well as the limitations of the
data (including the magnitude and configuration of slopes determined to
be safe). The document must also provide any explanatory information
necessary to select the correct benching system based on the data.
Option 2 requires employers to develop a written design approved by a
registered professional engineer. The design information must include
the magnitude and configuration of the slopes determined to be safe,
and the identity of the registered professional engineer who approved
the design.
    Paragraph (c)(2)(iii) allows employers to use manufacturer's
tabulated data or to deviate from the data provided. The manufacturer's
specification, recommendations and limitations as well as the
manufacturer's approval to deviate from these items shall be in
writing. Paragraphs (c)(3) and (c)(4) allow employers to design support
systems, shield systems, and other protective systems based on
tabulated data provided by a system manufacturer (Option 3) or obtained
from other sources including a registered professional engineer and
approved by a registered professional engineer (Option 4).
    Each of these provisions requires employers to maintain a copy of
the documents described in these options at the jobsite during
construction. After construction is completed, employers may store the
documents off-site provided they make them available to an OSHA
compliance officer on request. These documents provide both the
employer and the compliance officer with information needed to
determine if the selection and design of a protective system are
appropriate to the excavation work, thereby assuring workers of maximum
protection against cave-ins.

II. Special Issues for Comment

    OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
     Whether the proposed information collection requirements
are necessary for the proper performance of the Agency's functions,
including whether the information is useful;
     The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
     Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply;
for example, by using automated or other technological information
collection and transmission techniques.

III. Proposed Actions

    The Agency is requesting that OMB extend its approval of the
information collection requirements contained in the Standard on
Excavations (Design of Cave-in Protection Systems). An increase in the
number of construction starts from 706,000 starts to 761,873 contracted
for projects/sites has resulted in an adjustment increase in burden
hours from 11,813 to 14,266, a total increase of 2,453 burden hours.
    OSHA reduced the number of apartment and non-residential
construction sites that would use outside contractor engineering
services for the required protective system design approval from 5,900
to 2,038. While there was an increase in the hourly wage for a civil
engineer from $49.04 to $53.17, there is an overall adjustment decrease
of -$359,687 from $578,672 to $218,985.
    The Agency will summarize any comments submitted in response to
this notice and will include this summary in the request to OMB to
extend the approval of the information collection requirements
contained in the Standard.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Excavations (Design of Cave-in Protection Systems) (29 CFR
part 1926, subpart P).
    OMB Control Number: 1218-0137.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profits.
    Number of Respondents: 8,152.
    Number of Responses: 24,453.
    Frequency of Responses: On occasion.
    Average Time per Response: Two hours to obtain information on the
design of cave-in protection systems.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 14,266 hours.
    Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $218,895.

IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on This Notice and
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions

    You may submit comments in response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://

www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal eRulemaking Portal; (2) by
facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All comments, attachments, and
other material must identify the Agency name and the OSHA docket number
(Docket No. OSHA-2011-0057) for the ICR. You may supplement electronic
submissions by uploading document files electronically. If you wish to
mail additional materials in reference to an electronic or facsimile
submission, you must submit them to the OSHA Docket Office (see the
section of this notice titled ADDRESSES). The additional materials must
clearly identify your electronic comments by your name, date, and the
docket number so the Agency can attach them to your comments.
    Because of security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the delivery of materials by hand,
express delivery, messenger, or courier service, please contact the
OSHA Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>, (TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>).
    Comments and submissions are posted without change at http://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about
submitting personal information such as social security numbers and
date of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index, some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to read or download from this Web
site. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available
for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. Information on
using the http://www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments and
access the docket is available at the Web site's ``User Tips'' link.
Contact the OSHA Docket Office for information about materials not
available from the Web site and for assistance in using the Internet to
locate docket submissions.

V. Authority and Signature

    David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this
notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012
(77 FR 3912).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on July 25, 2014.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2014-17958 Filed 7-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 102 (Wednesday, May 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30602-30603]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12196]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD06-6-000]

Joint Meeting of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; Notice of Joint Meeting of the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) will hold a joint meeting on Wednesday, May
28, 2014 at the headquarters of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The
open meeting is expected to begin at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 10:30
a.m. Eastern Time. Members of the public may attend the open session.
This meeting will be followed by a session that is closed pursuant to
the attached certification of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Commissioners from both agencies are expected to participate.
    The format for the joint meeting will consist of discussions
between the two sets of Commissioners following presentations by their
respective staffs. In addition, representatives of the North American
Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) will attend and participate in
this meeting. A copy of the agenda for the open meeting is attached.
    A free webcast of this event will be made available through the NRC
Web site, at www.nrc.gov. In addition, the event will be transcribed
and the transcription will be made available through the NRC Web site
approximately three business days after the meeting.
    All interested persons are invited. Pre-registration is not
required and there is no fee to attend this joint meeting. Questions
about the meeting should be directed to Sarah McKinley at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 19, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
Attachment A

CERTIFICATION

    I, Margaret M. Doane, General Counsel of the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, hereby Certify, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(f)(1) and 10 CFR
Sec. 9.108(a), that on the basis of information presently available to
me, the meeting of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on the subject of
``Joint Meeting with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Grid Reliability'' scheduled for May
28, 2014, at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville
Maryland may be closed to the public pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3)
and 10 CFR Sec. 9.104(a)(3).

Dated at Rockville, Maryland

This 14th Day of May, 2014.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Margaret M. Doane,
General Counsel.
Attachment B
Title: JOINT MEETING OF THE (FERC) AND THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION (NRC) ON GRID RELIABILITY
Scheduled: May 28, 2014
    9:00 a.m. (Public Session)
Duration: Approx. 1 hour and 35 minutes
Location: Commissioners' Conference Room, 1st fl, NRC Headquarters
Building, One White Flint North, Rockville, MD

Participants:
FERC Chairman and Commissioners:
    Acting Chairman Cheryl A. LaFleur
    Commissioner Philip D. Moeller
    Commissioner John R. Norris
    Commissioner Tony Clark

NRC Chairman and Commissioners:
    Chairman Allison M. Macfarlane
    Commissioner Kristine L. Svinicki
    Commissioner George Apostolakis
    Commissioner William D. Magwood, IV
    Commissioner William C. Ostendorff

FERC Staff
    Arnie Quinn, Director, Division of Economics and Technical
Analysis, Office of Energy Policy and Innovation
    Bill Allerton, Director, Division of Dam Safety and Inspections,
Office of Energy Projects
    Barry Kuehnle, Critical Infrastructure Protection Senior Advisor,
Office of Energy Infrastructure Security
    Mike Peters, Energy Infrastructure & Cyber Security Advisor, Office
of Energy Infrastructure Security

North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Staff
    Tom Burgess, Vice President and Director, Reliability Assessment
and Performance Analysis
    Tim Roxey, Chief Security Officer, Senior Director--Electricity
Sector Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ES-ISAC)

NRC Staff
    Brian Smith, Acting Deputy Director, Division of Engineering,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
    Brian McDermott, Deputy Director, Office of Nuclear Security and
Incident Response

Presentations
     Introductions and Opening Statements.....  10 mins.
     Grid Reliability, Markets, and Extended    55 mins.
     Loss of All AC Power.
Mr. Burgess, NERC.....................................  10 mins.*
    [cir] 2014 State of Reliability Report Q&A........  10 mins.
    Mr. Quinn, FERC...................................  5 mins.*
            [cir] Market Dynamics that May Affect the   10 mins.
             Financial Viability of Nuclear Power
             Plants Q&A.
    Mr. Smith, NRC....................................  10 mins.*
    [cir] Nuclear Power Plants--License Renewals and
     Projections of New Units
    [cir] Extended Loss of All AC Power Mitigation      10 mins.
     Strategies--Order Implementation and the Scope of
     the Rulemaking Activity Q&A.
     Dam Safety...............................  30 mins.
    Mr. Allerton, FERC................................  5 mins.*
        [cir] MOU between FERC and NRC; Inspections;
         and Flood Evaluations

    Mr. Smith, NRC....................................  5 mins.*
        Areas of Cooperation with FERC: Inspections,    20 mins.
         Dams Upstream of Nuclear Power Plants, and
         Flooding Reevaluations Q&A.

*For presentations only and does not include time for Q & A's

[FR Doc. 2014-12196 Filed 5-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: December 17, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 243)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 76517-76518]
[DOCID:fr17de08-3]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0960; Airspace Docket No. 08-ASW-17]

Establishment of Class D and Class E Airspace; Conroe, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class D airspace and Class E airspace
at Lone Star Executive Airport, Conroe, TX. Establishment of an air
traffic control tower at Lone Star Executive Airport has made this
action necessary for the safety of Instrument Flight Rule (IFR)
operations at the airport. Class D airspace will revert to a Class E
Surface Area during periods when the control tower is not operating.
This action also corrects the radials used to define the airspace.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, March 12, 2009. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Ft. Worth, TX 76193-0530; telephone (817)
222-5582.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On October 7, 2008, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to establish Class D airspace and Class E
airspace at Conroe, TX (73 FR 58512, Docket No. FAA-2008-0960).
Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received. Subsequent to publication, the FAA found that a
minor correction to the radials defining the airspace was needed. This
action makes that correction. With the exception of editorial changes,
and the changes described above, this rule is the same as that proposed
in the NPRM. Class D airspace designations are published in paragraph
5000 of FAA Order 7400.9S signed October 3, 2008, and effective October
31, 2008, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. Class
E Surface Area airspace designations are published in paragraph 6002 of
FAA Order 7400.9S signed October 3, 2008, and effective October 31,
2008, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class
D airspace and Class E airspace designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in that Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by establishing Class D airspace and Class E Surface Area
airspace extending upward from the surface to and including 2,700 feet
MSL within a 4.1-mile radius of Lone Star Executive Airport, excluding
that airspace within the 4.1-mile radius north and east of the
intersection of the IAH 357[deg] radial and the TNV 083[deg] radial.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use

of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it establishes controlled airspace at Lone Star Executive
Airport, Conroe, TX.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9S, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, signed October 3, 2008, and effective October 31,
2008, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ASW TX D Conroe, TX [New]

Lone Star Executive Airport, TX
    (Lat. 30[deg]21'09'' N., long. 95[deg]24'52'' W.)
Humble VORTAC
    (Lat. 29[deg]57'25'' N., long. 95[deg]20'45'' W.)
Navasota VORTAC
    (Lat. 30[deg]17'19'' N., long. 96[deg]03'30'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,700 feet MSL within a 4.1-mile radius of Lone Star Executive
Airport, excluding that airspace within the 4.1-mile radius north
and east of the intersection of the IAH 357[deg] radial and the TNV
083[deg] radial. This Class D airspace area is effective during the
specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

ASW TX E2 Conroe, TX [New]

Lone Star Executive Airport, TX
    (Lat. 30[deg]21'09'' N., long. 95[deg]24'52'' W.)
Humble VORTAC
    (Lat. 29[deg]57'25'' N., long. 95[deg]20'45'' W.)
Navasota VORTAC
    (Lat. 30[deg]17'19'' N., long. 96[deg]03'30'' W.)

    Within a 4.1-mile radius of Lone Star Executive Airport,
excluding that airspace within the 4.1-mile radius north and east of
the intersection of the IAH 357[deg] radial and the TNV 083[deg]
radial. This Class E airspace area is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The
effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in
the Airport/Facility Directory.
* * * * *

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on December 9, 2008.
Walter L. Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. E8-29756 Filed 12-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P