[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 227 (Monday, November 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 73014]
[FR Doc No: 2022-25897]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2022-0026; OMB No. 1660-0023]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Community Assistance Contact (CAC) and
Community Assistance Visits (CAV) Reports

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: 30-Day notice of revision and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will submit the
information collection abstracted below to the Office of Management and
Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This notice seeks comments
concerning the effectiveness of a community's implementation of the
National Flood Insurance Program's Community Assistance Program (CAC)
and Community Assistance Visits (CAV) Reports.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 28, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection should be made to Director,
Information Management Division, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,
email address [email protected] or
Sarah Owen, Program Specialist, Floodplain Management Division,
Mitigation Directorate, Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration, FEMA at [email protected] or<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
codified as 42 U.S.C. 4001, et seq. is authorized by Public Law 90-448
(1968) and expanded by Public Law 93-234 (1973). The Department of
Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
administers the NFIP. The NFIP's major objective is to assure that
participating communities are achieving the flood loss reduction
objectives through adoption and enforcement of adequate land use and
control measures. Sections 1315 and 1361 provide the basis for FEMA's
process to evaluate how well communities are implementing their
floodplain management programs. Title 44 CFR 59.22 directs the
respondent to submit evidence of the corrective and preventive measures
taken to meet the flood loss reduction objectives.
    The two key methods FEMA uses in determining community assistance
needs are through the Community Assistance Contact (CAC) and Community
Assistance Visit (CAV), which serve to provide a systematic means of
monitoring community NFIP compliance. Through the CAC and CAV, FEMA can
also determine to what extent communities are achieving the flood loss
reduction objectives of the NFIP. By providing assistance to
communities, the CAC and CAV also serve to enhance FEMA's goals of
reducing future flood losses, thereby achieving the NFIP's cost-
containment objective. The burden hours and costs associated with this
collection were re-evaluated which led to the main revision in this
extension request.
    This proposed information collection previously published in the
Federal Register on September 1, 2022, at 87 FR 53760 with a 60 day
public comment period. No comments were received. The purpose of this
notice is to notify the public that FEMA will submit the information
collection abstracted below to the Office of Management and Budget for
review and clearance.

Collection of Information

    Title: Community Assistance Contact (CAC) and Community Assistance
Visits (CAV) Reports.
    Type of Information Collection: Extension, with change, of a
currently approved information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-0023.
    FEMA Forms: FEMA Form FF-206-FY-21-141 (formerly 086-0-28(E)),
Community Assistance Visit (CAV) Report; FEMA Form FF-206-FY-21-142
(formerly 086-0-29(E)), Community Assistance Contact (CAC) Report.
    Abstract: Through the use of a Community Assistance Contact (CAC)
or Community Assistance Visit (CAV), FEMA can make a comprehensive
assessment of a community's floodplain management program. Through this
assessment, FEMA can assist the community to understand the NFIP's
requirements, and implement effective flood loss reductions measures.
Communities can achieve cost savings through flood mitigation actions
by way of insurance premium discounts and reduced property damage.
    Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 100.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 2,000.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 60,000.
    Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost: $2,505,600.
    Estimated Respondents' Operation and Maintenance Costs: $0.
    Estimated Respondents' Capital and Start-Up Costs: $0.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost to the Federal Government: $2,181,968.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

Millicent Brown Wilson,
Records Management Branch Chief, Office of the Chief Administrative
Officer, Mission Support, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2022-25897 Filed 11-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-47-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 26, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 44535]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18871]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0042; FRL-9279-4]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Northern
Sierra Air Quality Management District, Sacramento Metropolitan Air
Quality Management District, and South Coast Air Quality Management
District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Northern Sierra
Air Quality Management District (NSAQMD), Sacramento Metropolitan Air
Quality Management District (SMAQMD), and South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) portions of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from gasoline dispensing facilities, polyester
resin operations, and spray booth facilities. We are proposing to
approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean
Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by August 25, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2011-0042, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system,
and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send e-mail directly to
EPA, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as
part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information
may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g.,
copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available in either
location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please
schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Grounds, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3019<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local
rules: NSAQMD Rule 215, SMAQMD Rule 465, and SCAQMD Rules 1132 and
1162. In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, we
are approving these local rules in a direct final action without prior
proposal because we believe these SIP revisions are not controversial.
If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in
subsequent action based on this proposed rule. Please note that if we
receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this
rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the
rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not
the subject of an adverse comment.
    We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
information, please see the direct final action.

    Dated: February 15, 2011.
 Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2011-18871 Filed 7-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22164]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9520]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2011-18]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to
improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of
FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to
affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before May 2, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA-2008-
0348 using any of the following methods:
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to the Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax: Fax comments to the Docket Management Facility at
202-493-2251.
     Hand Delivery: Bring comments to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Privacy: We will post all comments we receive, without change, to
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. Using the search function of our docket Web site, anyone can
find and read the comments received into any of our dockets, including
the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment
for an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
    Docket: To read background documents or comments received, go to
http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenna Sinclair, ANM-113, (425) 227-
1556, Federal Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW, Renton, WA
98057-3356, or Frances Shaver,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Office of Rulemaking
(ARM-1), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 14, 2011.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2008-0348.
    Petitioner: The Boeing Company.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: Sec.  25.812.
    Description of Relief Sought: Boeing requests an amendment to an
existing exemption for the Model 747-8F to modify Limitation 12, which
requires illumination at the ground end of the assist means used at the
crew door for all gear collapse conditions.

[FR Doc. 2011-9520 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


(i) If the state demonstrates through air quality modeling that the area can attain the applicable PM2.5 NAAQS by the end of the sixth calendar year following the effective date of designation of the area, the state shall adopt and implement all technologically and economically feasible control measures identified under paragraph (a)(3) of this section that are necessary to bring the area into attainment by such date. The state shall also adopt and implement all other technologically and economically feasible measures identified under paragraph (a)(3) of this section that, when considered collectively, would advance the attainment date for the area by at least 1 year. If the state demonstrates through this analysis that control measures for reducing emissions of a PM2.5 precursor would not be necessary for attainment as expeditiously as practicable or to advance the attainment date, then the state would not be required to include control measures for the precursor in the Moderate area attainment plan, nor be required to address the precursor in the RFP plan, quantitative milestones and associated reports, and contingency measures.
(A) Any control measure identified for adoption and implementation under this paragraph that can be implemented in whole or in part by 4 years after the effective date of designation of the Moderate PM2.5 nonattainment area shall be considered RACM for the area. Any such control measure that is also a control technology shall be considered RACT for the area.
(B) Any control measure identified for adoption and implementation under this paragraph that can only be implemented in whole or in part during the period beginning 4 years after the effective date of designation of the Moderate PM2.5 nonattainment area and the beginning of the calendar year that includes the applicable attainment date for the area shall be considered an additional reasonable measure for the area.
(ii) If the state demonstrates that the area cannot practicably attain the applicable PM2.5 NAAQS by the end of the sixth calendar year following the effective date of designation of the area, the state shall adopt all technologically and economically feasible control measures identified under paragraph (a)(3) of this section. This requirement also applies to areas that demonstrate pursuant to section 179B that the plan would be adequate to attain or maintain the standard but for emissions emanating from outside the United States.
(A) Any control measure identified for adoption and implementation under this paragraph that can be implemented in whole or in part by 4 years after the effective date of designation of the Moderate PM2.5 nonattainment area shall be considered RACM for the area. Any such control measure that is also a control technology shall be considered RACT for the area.
(B) Any control measure identified for adoption and implementation under this paragraph that can only be implemented in whole or in part during the period beginning 4 years after the effective date of designation of the Moderate PM2.5 nonattainment area through the end of the sixth calendar year following the effective date of designation of the area shall be considered an additional reasonable measure for the area.
(b) The state shall adopt control measures, including control technologies, on sources of direct PM2.5 emissions and sources of emissions of PM2.5 precursors located within the state but outside the Moderate PM2.5 nonattainment area if adopting such control measures is necessary to provide for attainment or will expedite attainment of the applicable PM2.5 NAAQS in such area.
(c) For new or revised source emissions limitations on sources of direct PM2.5 emissions, the state shall establish such emission limitations to apply either to the total of the filterable plus condensable fractions of direct PM2.5, or to filterable PM2.5 and condensable PM2.5 separately.
§ 51.1010	Serious area attainment plan control strategy requirements.
 (a) The state shall identify, adopt, and implement best available control measures, including control technologies, on sources of direct PM2.5 emissions and sources of emissions of PM2.5 precursors located in any Serious PM2.5 nonattainment area or portion thereof located within the state and consistent with the following:
(1) The state shall identify all sources of direct PM2.5 emissions and all sources of emissions of PM2.5 precursors in the nonattainment area in accordance with the emissions inventory requirements of § 51.1008(b);
(2) The state shall identify all potential control measures to reduce emissions from all sources of direct PM2.5 emissions and sources of emissions of PM2.5 precursors in the nonattainment area identified under paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
(i) The state shall survey other NAAQS nonattainment areas in the U.S. and identify any measures for direct PM2.5 and PM2.5 plan precursors not previously identified by the state during the development of the Moderate area attainment plan for the area.
(ii) The state may elect not to identify potential control measures to reduce emissions from any sources of a particular PM2.5 precursor if the state submits a comprehensive or major stationary source precursor demonstration consistent with § 51.1006 that can be deemed adequate by the EPA.
(3) The state may make a demonstration that any measure identified under paragraph (a)(2) of this section is not technologically or economically feasible to implement in whole or in part by the end of the tenth calendar year following the effective date of designation of the area, and may eliminate such whole or partial measure from further consideration under this paragraph.
(i) For purposes of evaluating the technological feasibility of a potential control measure, the state may consider factors including but not limited to a source's processes and operating procedures, raw materials, physical plant layout, and potential environmental impacts such as increased water pollution, waste disposal, and energy requirements.
(ii) For purposes of evaluating the economic feasibility of a potential control measure, the state may consider capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, and cost effectiveness of the measure.
(iii) The state shall submit to the EPA as part of its Serious area attainment plan submission a detailed written justification for eliminating from further consideration any potential control measure identified under paragraph (a)(2) of this section on the basis of technological or economic infeasibility. The state shall provide as part of its written justification an explanation of how its criteria for determining the technological and economic feasibility of potential control measures under paragraphs (a)(3)(i) and (ii) of this section are more stringent than its criteria for determining the technological and economic feasibility of potential control measures under § 51.1009(a)(3)(i) and (ii) for the same sources in the PM2.5 nonattainment area.
(4) Except as provided under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the state shall adopt and implement all potential control measures identified under paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(i) Any control measure that can be implemented in whole or in part by the end of the fourth year following the date of reclassification of the area to Serious shall be considered a best available control measure for the area. Any such control measure that is also a control technology for a stationary source in the area shall be considered a best available control technology for the area.
(ii) Any control measure that can be implemented in whole or in part between the end of the fourth year following the date of reclassification of the area to Serious and the applicable attainment date for the area shall be considered an additional feasible measure.
(5) The state shall use air quality modeling that meets the requirements of § 51.1011(b) and that accounts for emissions reductions estimated due to all best available control measures, including best available control technologies, and additional feasible measures identified for sources of direct PM2.5 emissions and sources of emissions of PM2.5 precursors in the area to demonstrate that the area can attain the PM2.5 NAAQS as expeditiously as practicable but no later than the end of the tenth calendar year following the effective date of designation of the area, or to demonstrate that the Serious PM2.5 nonattainment area cannot practicably attain the applicable PM2.5 NAAQS by such date.
(b) For a Serious PM2.5 nonattainment area for which air quality modeling demonstrates the area cannot practicably attain the applicable PM2.5 NAAQS by the end of the tenth calendar year following the date of designation of the area, the state shall identify, adopt, and implement the most stringent control measures that are included in the attainment plan for any state or are achieved in practice in any state, and can be feasibly implemented in the area, consistent with the following requirements.
(1) The state shall identify all sources of direct PM2.5 emissions and sources of emissions of PM2.5 precursors in the nonattainment area in accordance with the emissions inventory requirements of § 51.1008(b).
(2) The state shall identify all potential control measures to reduce emissions from all sources of direct PM2.5 emissions and sources of emissions of PM2.5 precursors in the nonattainment area identified under paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(i) For the sources and source categories represented in the emission inventory for the nonattainment area, the state shall identify the most stringent measures for reducing direct PM2.5 and PM2.5 plan precursors adopted into any SIP or used in practice to control emissions in any state.
(ii) The state shall reconsider and reassess any measures previously rejected by the state during the development of any previous Moderate area or Serious area attainment plan control strategy for the area.
(3) The state may make a demonstration that a measure identified under paragraph (b)(2) of this section is not technologically or economically feasible to implement in whole or in part by 5 years after the applicable attainment date for the area, and may eliminate such whole or partial measure from further consideration under this paragraph.
(i) For purposes of evaluating the technological feasibility of a potential control measure, the state may consider factors including but not limited to a source's processes and operating procedures, raw materials, physical plant layout, and potential environmental impacts such as increased water pollution, waste disposal, and energy requirements.
(ii) For purposes of evaluating the economic feasibility of a potential control measure, the state may consider capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, and cost effectiveness of the measure.
 (iii) The state shall submit to the EPA as part of its Serious area attainment plan submission a detailed written justification for eliminating from further consideration any potential control measure identified under paragraph (b)(2) of this section on the basis of technological or economic infeasibility.
(4) Except as provided under paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the state shall adopt and implement all control measures identified under paragraph (b)(2) of this section that collectively shall achieve attainment as expeditiously as practicable but no later than 5 years after the applicable attainment date for the area.
(5) The state shall use air quality modeling that meets the requirements of § 51.1011(b) and that accounts for emissions reductions estimated due to all most stringent measures; best available control measures, including best available control technologies; and additional feasible measures identified for sources of direct PM2.5 emissions and sources of emissions of PM2.5 precursors in the area to demonstrate that the area can attain the PM2.5 NAAQS as expeditiously as practicable but no later than the end of the fifteenth calendar year following the effective date of designation of the area.
(c) For a Serious PM2.5 nonattainment area that the EPA has determined has failed to attain by the applicable attainment date, the state shall submit a revised attainment plan with a control strategy that demonstrates that each year the area will achieve at least a 5 percent reduction in emissions of direct PM2.5 or a 5 percent reduction in emissions of a PM2.5 plan precursor based on the most recent emissions inventory for the area; and that the area will attain the standard as expeditiously as practicable consistent with section 51.1004(a)(3). The plan shall meet the requirements of section 51.1003(c)-(d), and the following requirements:
(1) The state shall identify all sources of direct PM2.5 emissions and sources of emissions of PM2.5 precursors in the nonattainment area in accordance with the emissions inventory requirements of § 51.1008(b).
(2) The state shall identify all potential control measures to reduce emissions from all sources of direct PM2.5 emissions and sources of emissions of PM2.5 precursors in the nonattainment area identified under paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
(i) For the sources and source categories represented in the emission inventory for the nonattainment area, the state shall identify the most stringent measures for reducing direct PM2.5 and PM2.5 plan precursors adopted into any SIP or used in practice to control emissions in any state.
(ii) The state shall reconsider and reassess any measures previously rejected by the state during the development of any Moderate area or Serious area attainment plan control strategy for the area.
(3) The state may make a demonstration that a measure identified under paragraph (b)(2) of this section is not technologically or economically feasible to implement in whole or in part within 5 years or such longer period as the EPA may determine is appropriate after the EPA's determination that the area failed to attain by the Serious area attainment date, and may eliminate such whole or partial measure from further consideration under this paragraph.
(i) For purposes of evaluating the technological feasibility of a potential control measure, the state may consider factors including but not limited to a source's processes and operating procedures, raw materials, physical plant layout, and potential environmental impacts such as increased water pollution, waste disposal, and energy requirements.
(ii) For purposes of evaluating the economic feasibility of a potential control measure, the state may consider capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, and cost effectiveness of the measure.
 (iii) The state shall submit to the EPA as part of its Serious area attainment plan submission a detailed written justification for eliminating from further consideration any potential control measure identified under paragraph (c)(2) of this section on the basis of technological or economic infeasibility.
(4) Except as provided under paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the state shall adopt and implement all control measures identified under paragraph (c)(2) of this section that collectively achieve attainment of the standard as expeditiously as practicable pursuant to section 51.1004(a)(3).
(5) The state shall conduct air quality modeling that meets the requirements of § 51.1011(b) and that accounts for emissions reductions due to control measures needed to meet the annual reduction requirement of 5 percent of direct PM2.5 or a PM2.5 plan precursor; most stringent measures; best available control measures, including best available control technologies; and additional feasible measures identified for sources of direct PM2.5 emissions and sources of emissions of PM2.5 precursors in the area in order to demonstrate that the area can attain the PM2.5 NAAQS as expeditiously as practicable.(d) The state shall adopt control measures, including control technologies, on sources of direct PM2.5 emissions and sources of emissions of PM2.5 precursors located within the state but outside the Serious PM2.5 nonattainment area if adopting such control measures is necessary to provide for attainment or will expedite attainment of the applicable PM2.5 NAAQS in such area.
 (e) For new or revised source emissions limitations on sources of direct PM2.5 emissions, the state shall establish such emission limitations to apply either to the total of the filterable plus condensable fractions of direct PM2.5, or to filterable PM2.5 and condensable PM2.5 separately.
§ 51.1011	Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements.
(a) Nonattainment areas initially classified as Moderate. The attainment demonstration due to the EPA as part of any Moderate area attainment plan required under § 51.1003(a) shall meet all of the following criteria:
(1) The attainment demonstration shall show the projected attainment date for the Moderate nonattainment area that is as expeditious as practicable in accordance with the requirements of § 51.1004(a)(1).
(2) The attainment demonstration shall meet the requirements of Appendix W of this part and shall include inventory data, modeling results, and emission reduction analyses on which the state has based its projected attainment date.
(3) The base year for the emissions inventory required for an attainment demonstration under this paragraph shall be one of the 3 years used for designations or another technically appropriate inventory year if justified by the state in the plan submission.
(4) The control strategies modeled as part of the attainment demonstration shall be consistent with the following as applicable:
(i) For a Moderate area that can demonstrate attainment of the applicable PM2.5 NAAQS no later than the end of the sixth calendar year following the date of designation of the area with the implementation of RACM and RACT and additional reasonable measures, the control strategies modeled as part of the attainment demonstration shall be consistent with control strategy requirements under § 51.1009(a).
(ii) For a Moderate area that cannot practicably attain the applicable PM2.5 NAAQS by the end of the sixth calendar year following the date of designation of the area with the implementation of RACM and RACT and additional reasonable measures, the control strategies modeled as part of the attainment demonstration shall be consistent with control strategy requirements under § 51.1009(b).
 (5) Required time frame for obtaining emissions reductions. For each Moderate nonattainment area, the attainment plan must provide for implementation of all control measures needed for attainment as expeditiously as practicable. All control measures in the attainment demonstration must be implemented no later than the beginning of the year containing the applicable attainment date, notwithstanding RACM implementation deadline requirements in § 51.1009.
(b) Nonattainment areas reclassified as Serious. The attainment demonstration due to the EPA as part of a Serious area attainment plan required under § 51.1003(b) or (c) shall meet all of the following criteria:
(1) The attainment demonstration shall show the projected attainment date for the Serious nonattainment area that is as expeditious as practicable.
 (2) The attainment demonstration shall meet the requirements of Appendix W of this part and shall include inventory data, modeling results, and emission reduction analyses on which the state has based its projected attainment date.
(3) The base year for the emissions inventories required for attainment demonstrations under this paragraph shall be one of the 3 years used for designations or another technically appropriate inventory year if justified by the state in the plan submission.
(4) The control strategies modeled as part of a Serious area attainment demonstration shall be consistent with the control strategies required pursuant to sections 51.1003 and 51.1010.
 (5) Required timeframe for obtaining emissions reductions. For each Serious nonattainment area, the attainment plan must provide for implementation of all control measures needed for attainment as expeditiously as practicable. All control measures must be implemented no later than the beginning of the year containing the applicable attainment date, notwithstanding BACM implementation deadline requirements in § 51.1010.
§ 51.1012	Reasonable further progress (RFP) requirements.
(a) Each attainment plan for a PM2.5 nonattainment area shall include an RFP plan that demonstrates that sources in the area will achieve such annual incremental reductions in emissions of direct PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors as are necessary to ensure attainment of the applicable PM2.5 NAAQS as expeditiously as practicable. The RFP plan shall include all of the following:
(1) A schedule describing the implementation of control measures during each year of the applicable attainment plan. Control measures for Moderate area attainment plans are required in § 51.1009, and control measures for Serious area attainment plans are required in § 51.1010.
(2) RFP projected emissions for direct PM2.5 and all PM2.5 plan precursors for each applicable milestone year, based on the anticipated implementation schedule for control measures required in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. For purposes of establishing motor vehicle emissions budgets for transportation conformity purposes (as required in 40 CFR part 93) for a PM2.5 nonattainment area, the state shall include in its RFP submission an inventory of on-road mobile source emissions in the nonattainment area for each milestone year.
(3) An analysis that presents the schedule of control measures and estimated emissions changes to be achieved by each milestone year, and that demonstrates that the control strategy will achieve reasonable progress toward attainment between the applicable base year and the attainment year. The analysis shall rely on information from the base year inventory required in 51.1008(a)(1) and the attainment projected inventory required in 51.1008(a)(2), in addition to the RFP projected emissions required in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(4) An analysis that demonstrates that by the end of the calendar year for each milestone date for the area determined in accordance with § 51.1013(a), pollutant emissions will be at levels that reflect either generally linear progress or step-wise progress in reducing emissions on an annual basis between the base year and the attainment year. A demonstration of step-wise progress must be accompanied by appropriate justification for the selected implementation schedule.
(5) At the state's election, an analysis that identifies air quality targets associated with the RFP projected emissions identified for the milestone years at the design value monitor locations.
(b) For a multi-state or multi-jurisdictional nonattainment area, the RFP plans for each state represented in the nonattainment area shall demonstrate RFP on the basis of common multi-state inventories. The states or jurisdictions within which the area is located must provide a coordinated RFP plan. Each state in a multi-state nonattainment area must ensure that the sources within its boundaries comply with enforceable emission levels and other requirements that in combination with the reductions planned in other state(s) within the nonattainment area will provide for attainment as expeditiously as practicable and demonstrate RFP consistent with these regulations.
§ 51.1013	Quantitative milestone requirements.
(a) Consistent with CAA section 189(c)(1), the state must submit in each attainment plan for a PM2.5 nonattainment area specific quantitative milestones that demonstrate reasonable further progress toward attainment of the applicable PM2.5 NAAQS in the area and that meet the following requirements:
(1) Nonattainment areas initially classified as Moderate.
(i) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, each attainment plan submittal for a Moderate PM2.5 nonattainment area shall contain quantitative milestones to be achieved no later than a milestone date of 4.5 years and 7.5 years from the date of designation of the area.
 (ii) The plan shall contain quantitative milestones to be achieved by the milestone dates specified in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section, as applicable, and that provide for objective evaluation of reasonable further progress toward timely attainment of the applicable PM2.5 NAAQS in the area. At a minimum, each quantitative milestone plan must include a milestone for tracking progress achieved in implementing the SIP control measures, including RACM and RACT, by each milestone date.
(2) Nonattainment areas reclassified as Serious.
(i) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, each attainment plan submission that demonstrates that a Serious PM2.5 nonattainment area can attain a particular PM2.5 NAAQS by the end of the tenth calendar year following the effective date of designation of the area with the implementation of control measures as required under § 51.1010(a) shall contain quantitative milestones to be achieved no later than milestone dates of 7.5 years and 10.5 years, respectively, from the date of designation of the area.
(ii) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, each attainment plan submission that demonstrates that a Serious PM2.5 nonattainment area cannot practicably attain a particular PM2.5 NAAQS by the end of the tenth calendar year following the date of designation of the area with the implementation of control measures required under § 51.1010(a) shall contain quantitative milestones to be achieved no later than milestone dates of 7.5 years, 10.5 years, and 13.5 years from the date of designation of the area. If the attainment date is beyond 13.5 years from the date of designation of the area, such attainment plan shall also contain a quantitative milestones to be achieved no later than milestone dates of 16.5 years, respectively, from the date of designation of the area.
(iii) The plan shall contain quantitative milestones to be achieved by the milestone dates specified in paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section, as applicable, and that provide for objective evaluation of reasonable further progress toward timely attainment of the applicable PM2.5 NAAQS in the area. At a minimum, each quantitative milestone plan must include a milestone for tracking progress achieved in implementing SIP control measures, including BACM and BACT, by each milestone date.
(3) Serious areas that fail to attain by the applicable Serious area attainment date.
(i) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, each attainment plan submission for a Serious area that failed to attain a particular PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable Serious area attainment date and is therefore subject to the requirements of CAA section 189(d) and § 51.1003(c) shall contain quantitative milestones.
(A) If the attainment plan is due prior to a date 13.5 years from designation of the area, then the plan shall contain milestones to be achieved by no later than a milestone date of 13.5 years from the date of designation of the area, and every 3 years thereafter, until the milestone date that falls within three years after the applicable attainment date.
(B) If the attainment plan is due later than a date 13.5 years from designation of the area, then the plan shall contain milestones to be achieved by no later than a milestone date of 16.5 years from the date of designation of the area, and every 3 years thereafter, until the milestone date that falls within three years after the applicable attainment date.
(ii) The plan shall contain quantitative milestones to be achieved by the milestone dates for the area, and that provide for objective evaluation of reasonable further progress toward timely attainment of the applicable PM2.5 NAAQS in the area. At a minimum, each quantitative milestone plan must include a milestone for tracking progress achieved in implementing the SIP control measures by each milestone date.
(4) Each attainment plan submission for an area designated nonattainment for the 1997 and/or 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS before January 15, 2015, shall contain quantitative milestones to be achieved no later than 3 years after December 31, 2014, and every 3 years thereafter until the milestone date that falls within three years after the applicable attainment date.
(b) Not later than 90 days after the date on which a milestone applicable to a PM2.5 nonattainment area occurs, each state in which all or part of such area is located shall submit to the Administrator a milestone report that contains all of the following:
(1) A certification by the Governor or Governor's designee that the SIP control strategy is being implemented consistent with the RFP plan, as described in the applicable attainment plan;
(2) Technical support, including calculations, sufficient to document completion statistics for appropriate milestones and to demonstrate that the quantitative milestones have been satisfied and how the emissions reductions achieved to date compare to those required or scheduled to meet RFP; and,
(3) A discussion of whether the area will attain the applicable PM2.5 NAAQS by the projected attainment date for the area.
 (c) If a state fails to submit a milestone report by the date specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the Administrator shall require the state to submit, within 9 months after such failure, a plan revision that assures that the area will achieve the next milestone or attain the applicable NAAQS by the applicable date, whichever is earlier. If the Administrator determines that an area has not met any applicable milestone by the milestone date, the state shall submit, within 9 months after such determination, a plan revision that assures that the area will achieve the next milestone or attain the applicable NAAQS by the applicable date, whichever is earlier.
§ 51.1014	Contingency measure requirements.
(a) The state must include as part of each attainment plan submitted under this subpart for a PM2.5 nonattainment area specific contingency measures that shall take effect with minimal further action by the state or the EPA following a determination by the Administrator that the area has failed:
(1) to meet any RFP requirement in an attainment plan approved in accordance with § 51.1012;
(2) to meet any quantitative milestone in an attainment plan approved in accordance with § 51.1013;
(3) to submit a quantitative milestone report required under § 51.1013(b); or,
(4) to attain the applicable PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date.
(b) The contingency measures adopted as part of a PM2.5 attainment plan shall meet all of the following requirements:
(1) The contingency measures shall consist of control measures that are not otherwise included in the control strategy or that achieve emission reductions not otherwise relied upon in the control strategy for the area; and,
(2) Each contingency measure shall specify the timeframe within which its requirements become effective following a determination by the Administrator under paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) The attainment plan submission shall contain a description of the specific trigger mechanisms for the contingency measures and specify a schedule for implementation.
§ 51.1015	Clean data requirements.
(a) Nonattainment areas initially classified as Moderate. Upon a determination by the EPA that a Moderate PM2.5 nonattainment area has attained the PM2.5 NAAQS, the requirements for the state to submit an attainment demonstration, provisions demonstrating that reasonably available control measures (including reasonably available control technology for stationary sources) shall be implemented no later than 4 years following the date of designation of the area, reasonable further progress plan, quantitative milestones and quantitative milestone reports, and contingency measures for the area shall be suspended until such time as:
(1) The area is redesignated to attainment, after which such requirements are permanently discharged; or,
(2) The EPA determines that the area has re-violated the PM2.5 NAAQS, at which time the state shall submit such attainment plan elements for the Moderate nonattainment area by a future date to be determined by the EPA and announced through publication in the Federal Register at the time EPA determines the area is violating the PM2.5 NAAQS.
(b) Nonattainment areas reclassified as Serious. Upon a determination by the EPA that a Serious PM2.5 nonattainment area has attained the PM2.5 NAAQS, the requirements for the state to submit an attainment demonstration, reasonable further progress plan, quantitative milestones and quantitative milestone reports, and contingency measures for the area shall be suspended until such time as:
(1) The area is redesignated to attainment, after which such requirements are permanently discharged; or,
(2) The EPA determines that the area has re-violated the PM2.5 NAAQS, at which time the state shall submit such attainment plan elements for the Serious nonattainment area by a future date to be determined by the EPA and announced through publication in the Federal Register at the time the EPA determines the area is violating the PM2.5 NAAQS.
§ 51.1016 	Continued applicability of the FIP and SIP requirements pertaining to interstate transport under CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and (ii) after revocation of the 1997 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
All control requirements associated with a FIP or approved SIP in effect for an area pursuant to obligations arising from CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and (ii) as of [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS FROM PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], such as the CAIR or the CSAPR, shall continue to apply after revocation of the 1997 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Control requirements associated with a FIP or approved into the SIP pursuant to obligations arising from CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and (ii), including 40 CFR 51.123, 51.124, 52.35, 52.36, 52.38 and 52.39, may be modified by the state only if the requirements of §§ 51.123, 51.124, 52.35, 52.36, 52.38 and 52.39, including statewide annual SO2 and annual NOx emission budgets, continue to be in effect. Any such modification must meet the requirements of CAA section 110(l).

PART 93--DETERMINING CONFORMITY OF FEDERAL ACTIONS TO STATE OR FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
7. The authority citation for part 93 continues to read as follows:
    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Subpart B -- Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plans
8. In §93.153, revise paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) to read as follows:
§93.153 Applicability.
*   *   *   *   *
     (b) *   *   *
    (1) For purposes of paragraph (b) of this section the following rates apply in nonattainment areas (NAA's):

Tons/year
Ozone (VOC's or NOx):

       Serious NAA's
                                                                             50
       Severe NAA's
                                                                             25
       Extreme NAA's
                                                                             10
       Other ozone NAA's outside an ozone transport region
                                                                            100
Other ozone NAA's inside an ozone transport region:

       VOC
                                                                             50
       NOx
                                                                            100
Carbon Monoxide: All maintenance areas
                                                                            100
SO2 or NO2: All NAA's
                                                                            100
PM10:

       Moderate NAA's
                                                                            100
       Serious NAA's
                                                                             70
PM2.5 (direct emissions, SO2, NOx, VOC, and ammonia):

       Moderate NAA's
                                                                            100
       Serious NAA's
                                                                             70
Pb: All NAA's
                                                                             25

    (2) For purposes of paragraph (b) of this section the following rates apply in maintenance areas:

Tons/year
Ozone (NOx, SO2 or NO2):

All maintenance areas
                                                                            100
Ozone (VOC's):

Maintenance areas inside an ozone transport region
                                                                             50
Maintenance areas outside an ozone transport region
                                                                            100
Carbon monoxide: All maintenance areas
                                                                            100
PM10: All maintenance areas
                                                                            100
PM2.5 (direct emissions, SO2, NOx, VOC, and ammonia)
                                                                            100
All maintenance areas
                                                                            100
Pb: All maintenance areas
                                                                             25

      *   *   *   *   *
9. In Appendix A to subpart A of part 51: revise table 1 (includes changes to cells and removing footnote 4)
Appendix A to Subpart A of Part 51--Tables
Table 1 to Appendix A of Subpart A  -  Emission Thresholds[1] by Pollutant for Treatment as Point Source Under 40 CFR 51.30

Pollutant
Every-year
                                   Triennial

Type A Sources 2
Type B
Sources
NAA
Sources[3]
(1) SO2
>=2500
>=100
>=100

PM2.5 (serious) >= 70
(2) VOC
>=250
>=100
>= 100

O3 (serious) >= 50

O3 (severe) >= 25

O3 (extreme) >= 10

PM2.5 (serious) >= 70
(3) NOx
>=2500
>=100
>=100

PM2.5 (serious) >= 70
(4) CO
>=2500
>=1000
O3 (all areas) >= 100

CO (all areas) >= 100
(5) Lead

>=0.5 (actual)
>=0.5 (actual)
(6) Primary PM10
>=250
>=100
>=100

PM10 (serious) >=70
(7) Primary PM2.5
>=250
>=100
>=100

PM2.5 (serious) >=70
(8) NH3
>=250
>=100
>=100

PM2.5 (serious) >=70
1 Thresholds for point source determination shown in tons per year of potential to emit as defined in 40 CFR part 70, with the exception of lead. Reported emissions should be in actual tons emitted for the required time period.
[2] Type A sources are a subset of the Type B sources and are the larger emitting sources by pollutant.
[3] NAA = Nonattainment Area. The point source reporting thresholds vary by attainment status for SO2, VOC, NOx, CO, PM2.5, and PM10.


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 21785]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08991]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copy Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Form N-5, SEC File No. 270-172, OMB Control No. 3235-0169.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the
collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to
submit this existing collection of information to the Office of
Management and Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
    Form N-5 (17 CFR 239.24 and 274.5) is the form used by small
business investment companies (``SBICs'') to register their securities
under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) (``Securities
Act'') and the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.)
(``Investment Company Act''). Form N-5 is the registration statement
form adopted by the Commission for use by an SBIC that has been
licensed as such under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 or
which has received the preliminary approval of the Small Business
Administration (``SBA'') and has been notified by the SBA that the
company may submit a license application Form N-5 is an integrated
registration form and may be used as the registration statement under
both the Securities Act and the Investment Company Act. The purpose of
Form N-5 is to meet the filing and disclosure requirements of both the
Securities Act and Investment Company Act, and to provide investors
with information sufficient to evaluate an investment in an SBIC. The
information that is required to be filed with the Commission permits
verification of compliance with securities law requirements and assures
the public availability and dissemination of the information.
    The Commission has received one filing on Form N-5 in the last
three years, and we therefore estimate that SBICs will file about 0.333
filings on Form N-5 per year. The currently approved burden of Form N-5
is 352 hours per response. Therefore, the number of currently approved
aggregate burden hours, when calculated using the current estimate for
number of filings is about 117 hours per year. The currently approved
cost burden of Form N-5 is $30,000 per filing. We continue to believe
this estimate for Form N-5's cost burden is appropriate. Therefore, we
estimate that the aggregate cost burden, when calculated using the
Commission's estimate of 0.333 filings per year, is about $10,000 in
external costs per year.
    Estimates of average burden hours and costs are made solely for the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and are not derived from a
comprehensive or even representative survey or study of the costs of
Commission rules and forms. Compliance with the collection of
information requirements of Form N-5 is mandatory. Responses to the
collection of information will not be kept confidential. An agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information has practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burden of
the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549; or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    April 15, 2015.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08991 Filed 4-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Dear Mr. Zeller:

I am an individual consumer writing to request an extension of the comment period for the Food and Drug Administration's Proposed Rule Deeming Tobacco Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking and Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the "Proposed Rule") published at 79 Fed. Reg. 23,142 and Federal Register No. 2014-09491. On behalf of myself, I am requesting that the comment period for the Proposed Rule be extended by the FDA for an additional 105 days, from its current 75-day period, to 180 days.

The Proposed Rule raises a number of significant issues and questions that are important and relevant to me, as a consumer of products that are proposed for regulation under the Proposed Rule. The Proposed Rule asks approximately one hundred different questions that I would like to respond to. I want to provide my thoughts and comments on many of these issues, but my time to devote to researching and providing thoughtful comments on these important questions is limited. I know that the FDA took many years to even come up with the Proposed Rule, so I do not think it is at all unreasonable to allow the public a mere six months to comment on it. This is our only opportunity, as consumers, to provide our feedback.

I feel very strongly that electronic cigarettes are a less hazardous alternative to tobacco cigarettes. I absolutely believe that they saved my life. I would like to provide you with my personal story, as well as science and evidence-based responses to your questions so that you can take my comment into account. I realize that the FDA has the authority under 21 CFR 10.40 to extend this time frame and that the FDA has exercised this authority on numerous occasions in the past. I would therefore ask that you also do so here, so that all stakeholders have the opportunity to provide their comments on this proposed regulation.

I appreciate your consideration of my request and am happy to discuss this issue with you further.

Chris J. Rodriguez Fort Worth, Texas


[Federal Register: July 9, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 132)]
[Notices]
[Page 39371]
[DOCID:fr09jy08-121]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2008-25]

Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of certain petitions seeking
relief from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this
notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and participation in,
this aspect of FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this
notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is
intended to affect the legal status of any petition or its final
disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket
number involved and must be received on or before July 21, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA-2006-
25466 using any of the following methods:
     Government-wide Rulemaking Web Site: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to the Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax: Fax comments to the Docket Management Facility at
202-493-2251.
     Hand Delivery: Bring comments to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Docket: To read background documents or comments received,
go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor
at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We will post all comments we receive,
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. Using the search function of our docket Web
Site, anyone can find and read the comments received into any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tyneka Thomas<PHONE_NUMBER> or
Frances Shaver<PHONE_NUMBER>, Office of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 2, 2008.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petitions for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2006-25466.
    Petitioner: Southwest Airlines Co.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: Sec. Sec.  121.391(a) and 121.393(b).
    Description of Relief Sought: To clarify or amend Southwest
Airlines, Co. (Southwest), current Exemption No. 9382, which allows
Southwest to substitute a pilot for one required flight attendant
crewmember during boarding at an intermediate stop and to reduce the
number of required flight attendants onboard during the deplaning of
passengers at an intermediate stop. The clarification or amendment
Southwest seeks would broaden the exemption to include all stops from
the time the aircraft door is opened upon arrival at the gate until the
door is closed prior to the next flight operation. Southwest also
requests that the certificate holder may substitute for the required
flight attendants other persons qualified in the emergency evacuation
procedures for that aircraft as required in Sec.  121.417, for all
stops, if these persons are identified to the passengers.
[FR Doc. E8-15481 Filed 7-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35665-35668]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14767]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 201 and 310

[Docket No. FDA-2010-D-0509]

Draft Guidance for Industry on Enforcement Policy for Over-the-
Counter Sunscreen Drug Products Marketed Without an Approved
Application; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Enforcement
Policy--OTC Sunscreen Drug Products Marketed Without an Approved
Application.'' The draft guidance is intended to inform manufacturers
of over-the-counter (OTC) sunscreen products about our enforcement
policy for certain OTC sunscreen products marketed without an approved
new drug application. The draft guidance describes our intended
approach to enforcement for certain OTC sunscreen products prior to an
effective final monograph.

DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers all comments on this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by August 16, 2011. Submit written comments on the proposed
collection of information by August 16, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing
your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.
    Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reynold Tan, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New

Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, rm. 5411, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-2090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry
entitled ``Enforcement Policy--OTC Sunscreen Drug Products Marketed
Without an Approved Application.'' Certain OTC sunscreen products
without an approved new drug application \1\ have been marketed under
our enforcement discretion while we work to establish a final monograph
for OTC sunscreen products. These products are not yet the subject of
an effective final monograph.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
(21 U.S.C. 355). Approved applications under section 505 include
both new drug applications (NDAs) and abbreviated new drug
applications (ANDAs).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We continue to evaluate information to determine appropriate
conditions for OTC sunscreen products to be generally recognized as
safe and effective (GRASE) and not misbranded. In a final rule
published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, we establish
in Sec.  201.327 (21 CFR 201.327) and Sec.  310.545 (21 CFR 310.545)
labeling and testing requirements for OTC sunscreen products that
contain certain active ingredients and are marketed without approved
applications. We are also publishing a proposed rule elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register that would, if finalized, limit the
maximum labeled sun protection factor (SPF) value for OTC sunscreen
products to ``50 +''or ``50 plus.'' In addition to both rules mentioned
previously, we are publishing an ANPRM where we are asking sunscreen
manufacturers and other interested parties to submit data on OTC
sunscreen drug products marketed without approved applications that are
formulated in certain dosage forms. For spray dosage forms, we are
requesting data to resolve specific questions about both effectiveness
and safety. We are also inviting comment on possible labeling and
testing requirements for spray dosage forms.
    Because of this complex regulatory backdrop, we are developing a
guidance to clarify our enforcement policy towards certain OTC
sunscreen products before a final monograph becomes effective. The
draft guidance applies only to OTC sunscreen products marketed without
an approved application that contain only active ingredients or
combinations of active ingredients identified as GRASE in a 1999
sunscreen final rule published in the Federal Register of May 21, 1999
(64 FR 27666) (the 1999 final rule) that was stayed before becoming
effective (69 FR 53801, September 3, 2004);
    The draft guidance states our intention to continue to exercise
enforcement discretion for these types of products under certain
circumstances. The draft guidance addresses OTC sunscreen products
subject to the final rule codified in Sec.  201.327 (i.e., products
with Broad Spectrum SPF values of 15 or higher, products that do not
provide broad spectrum protection, and products with Broad Spectrum SPF
values between 2 and 14). The draft guidance also indicates the
Agency's enforcement approach for sunscreen products labeled with
specific SPF values higher than 50, sunscreens formulated in various
dosage forms, and products that contain an insect repellent active
ingredient registered with the Environmental Protection Agency. In
addition, the draft guidance addresses enforcement policy with regard
to the continued labeling of certain OTC sunscreens with SPF values
determined using the SPF test methods contained in either the Agency's
1999 final rule (64 FR 27666 at 27689 through 27693) or a proposed rule
that published in the Federal Register of August 27, 2007 (the 2007
proposed rule) (72 FR 49070 at 49114 through 49119).
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the Agency's current thinking on
``Enforcement Policy--OTC Sunscreen Drug Products Marketed Without an
Approved Application.'' It does not create or confer any rights for or
on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An
alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This draft guidance discusses our intended enforcement policy for
OTC sunscreen products marketed without approved applications,
including recommendations for labeling and testing of these products.
Certain of these provisions are subject to review and approval by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). These provisions are discussed
further in the following paragraphs.
    The draft guidance also references submissions under 21 CFR 330.14.
The information collections provisions of that regulation have been
submitted to OMB for approval, in accordance with the PRA (76 FR 6801,
February 8, 2011).
    Under the PRA, Federal Agencies must obtain approval from OMB for
each collection of information that they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register for each proposed collection of information before
submitting the collection to OMB for approval.
    This draft guidance refers to labeling and testing requirements
applicable to certain OTC sunscreen products under Sec.  201.327.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, in accordance with
section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, we are publishing a 60-day notice
soliciting public comment on the collections of information in that
regulation and will then submit these information collection provisions
to OMB for approval. These requirements will not be effective until we
obtain OMB approval.
    This draft guidance also contains additional information collection
provisions that are not addressed by the notice regarding the
provisions of Sec.  201.327. To comply with the requirements of the
PRA, we are publishing this notice of the additional proposed
collection of information set forth in this guidance document and
inviting comments on the following topics: (1) Whether the proposed
information collected is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimated burden of the proposed
information collected, including the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of
information collected on the respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.

Information Collections Applicable to Sunscreens That Choose To Defer
Retesting of SPF Values and Continue Labeling With a Previously-
Calculated SPF Value

    As already noted, the information collection provisions resulting
from

Sec.  201.327 addressed in this draft guidance are the subject of a 60-
day PRA notice published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register. This draft guidance proposes to temporarily modify that
information collection by stating that we do not intend to initiate
enforcement action before June 17, 2013, if an OTC sunscreen subject to
Sec.  201.327 that was initially marketed prior to June 17, 2011, the
date of publication of the 2011 final rule, continues to include an SPF
value in its labeling that was determined prior to that date according
to either the SPF test method described in the 1999 final rule (64 FR
27666 at 27689 through 27693) or the SPF test method described in the
2007 proposed rule (72 FR 49070 at 49114 through 49119). We believe
that the majority of currently-marketed sunscreen formulations will
meet this standard and, therefore, may defer their conduct of new SPF
testing. However, this one-time testing will need to be conducted
within 2 years after publication of the 2011 final rule (Sec.
201.327), which is within the period addressed in the PRA notice for
that regulation. We, therefore, do not expect this draft guidance will
alter the burden calculated for SPF testing under 201.327(i) or
calculated for developing the PDP (principal display panel) label in
compliance with 201.327(a)(1), as indicated in that document.
    Under the draft guidance, manufacturers who do choose to delay SPF
testing in accordance with 201.327(i) would nonetheless be expected to
include on their product's PDP the effectiveness statement required by
201.327(a)(1)--either ``Broad Spectrum SPF'' or ``SPF'', as
applicable--followed by the numerical SPF value resulting from prior
testing. This creates a burden for third-party disclosure. With respect
to the 2011 final rule, we estimated that there are approximately 100
manufacturers of sunscreens (respondents) and we anticipated that it
would require no more than 0.5 hours per stock keeping units (SKU) for
these manufacturers to prepare and review labeling that inserts the SPF
value into the effectiveness statement provided by 201.327(a)(1).\2\ We
anticipate that manufacturers will choose to avail themselves of the
delay of SPF testing provided for under the guidance for as many as
half (1,175) of the 2,350 formulations estimated in the 2011 final
rule. Based on the estimate that there are about 1.53 SKUs for every
formulation, we estimate that as many as 1,798 SKUs may have to be re-
labeled. For these 1,798 SKUs, we estimate that it will take no more
than 0.5 hours per SKU to prepare and review labeling that inserts a
previously derived SPF value into the effectiveness (SPF) statement
required under 201.327(a)(1). Therefore, the total burden is estimated
be 899 hours (1,798 SKUs times 0.5 hours per SKU).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ By the terms of our enforcement policy, such manufacturers
would be employing an existing test value, and thus would not incur
any additional burden of testing associated with this information
collection provision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The final rule becomes effective 1 year after its date of
publication, so that firms that seek to fall within the enforcement
policy described in the guidance will need to begin labeling products
with their previously-derived SPF value within the first year after
publication of the rule. (Under the enforcement policy guidance,
labeling bearing a previously derived SPF value will have to be
discontinued and replaced by the labeling required by 201.327(a)(1) no
later than 2 years after the date of publication of the final rule.) We
therefore assume that the entire burden of labeling products with
previously derived SPF values will be incurred in the first year, with
no recurrence. This burden estimate is presented in table 1 of this
document.

                           Table 1--Estimated Annual Third-Party Disclosure Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Annual
            Activity                 Number of     frequency per   Total annual      Hours per      Total hours
                                    respondents      response        responses       response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create PDP labeling statement                100           17.98           1,798             0.5             899
 ``Broad Spectrum SPF [fill in
 value]'' based on existing SPF
 test results \2\...............
                                                                                ---------------
    Total first-year burden.....  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............             899
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.
\2\ First-year burden.

    We conclude that other labeling recommendations of the draft
guidance are not subject to review by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The labeling statements for
additional directions and warnings recommended in the guidance for
sunscreens formulated as sprays are a ``public disclosure of
information originally supplied by the Federal Government to the
recipient for the purpose of disclosure to the public'' (5 CFR
1320.3(c)(2)) and, therefore, are not collections of information.

III. Comments

    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no
longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

IV. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the draft guidance
document at either http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: June 9, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-14767 Filed 6-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 23326]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09704]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket No. FRA-2015-0007-N-8]

Agency Request for Emergency Processing of Collection of
Information by the Office of Management and Budget

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), United States Department
of Transportation (USDOT).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FRA hereby gives notice that it is submitting the following
Information Collection request (ICR) to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for emergency processing under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995. FRA requests that OMB authorize the collection of information
identified below immediately upon publication of this Notice for a
period of 180 days.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of this individual ICR, with
applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by telephoning
FRA's Office of Railroad Safety Clearance Officer: Robert Brogan (tel.
(202) 493-6292) or FRA's Office of Administration Clearance Officer:
Kimberly Toone (tel.<PHONE_NUMBER>) (these numbers are not toll-free);
or by contacting Mr. Brogan via facsimile at<PHONE_NUMBER> or Ms.
Toone via facsimile at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or via email by contacting Mr.
Brogan at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by contacting Ms. Toone at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments and questions about the ICR identified
below should be directed to OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attn: FRA OMB Desk Officer.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Recent derailments have occurred involving
trains transporting large quantities of petroleum crude oil and
ethanol. Preliminary investigation of one of these recent derailments
involving a crude oil train indicates that a mechanical defect
involving a broken tank car wheel may have caused or contributed to the
incident. FRA is is issuing Safety Advisory 2015-01 to make
recommendations to enhance the mechanical safety of the cars in trains
transporting large quantities of flammable liquids. The Safety Advisory
recommends that railroads use highly qualified individuals to conduct
the brake and mechanical inspections and recommends a reduction to the
impact threshold levels the industry currently uses for wayside
detectors that measure wheel impacts to ensure the wheel integrity of
tank cars in those trains.
    Title: Mechanical Inspections and Wheel Impact Detector Standards
for Trains Transporting Large Amounts of Class 3 Flammable Liquids.
    Reporting Burden:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Average time
   Safety advisory 2015-01      Respondent  universe   Total annual  responses    per response     Total annual
                                                                                (minutes)      burden (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Maintenance Advisories    70 Railroads...........  350,000 Advisories.....                1            5,833
 from Railroads to Car
 Owners after Wheel Impact
 Load Detector (WILD)
 Automatic Notification that
 Detects an Impact Above
 Threshold of 60kips.
(2) Records of Initial        70 Railroads...........  1,000 Inspections/                    30              500
 Terminal Brake Inspection                              Records.
 by Qualified Mechanical
 Inspector and Records of
 Freight Car Inspections at
 Initial Terminals with
 Designated Inspectors.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Number(s): N/A.
    Respondent Universe: 70 Railroads.
    Frequency of Submission: One-time; on occasion.
    Total Estimated Responses: 351,000.
    Total Estimated Annual Burden: 6,333 hours.
    Status: Emergency Review.
    Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5 CFR 320.5(b), 1320.8(b)(3)(vi),
FRA informs all interested parties that it may not conduct or sponsor,
and a respondent is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

    Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.

Erin McCartney,
Budget Director.
[FR Doc. 2015-09704 Filed 4-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 81 (Friday, April 26, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17892-17893]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08433]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2009-0026]

Curtis-Strauss LLC: Grant of Expansion of Recognition

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this notice, OSHA announces the final decision to expand
the scope of recognition for Curtis-Strauss LLC (CSL), as a Nationally
Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL).

DATES: The expansion of the scope of recognition becomes effective on
April 26, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information regarding this notice is
available from the following sources:
    Press inquiries: Contact Mr. Frank Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office
of Communications, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email: [email protected].
    General and technical information: Contact Mr. Kevin Robinson,
Director, Office of Technical Programs and Coordination Activities,
Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone:
(202) 693-2110; email: [email protected]. OSHA's web page includes
information about the NRTL Program (see http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/index.html).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Notice of Final Decision

    OSHA hereby gives notice of the expansion of the scope of
recognition of Curtis-Strauss LLC, as a NRTL. CSL's expansion covers
the addition of one test standard to its scope of recognition.
    OSHA recognition of a NRTL signifies that the organization meets
the requirements specified by 29 CFR 1910.7. Recognition is an
acknowledgment that the organization can perform independent safety
testing and certification of the specific products covered within its
scope of recognition and is not a delegation or grant of government
authority. As a result of recognition, employers may use products
properly approved by the NRTL to meet OSHA standards that require
testing and certification of the products.
    The agency processes applications by a NRTL for initial
recognition, or for expansion or renewal of this recognition, following
requirements in Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. This appendix requires
that the agency publish two notices in the Federal Register in
processing an application. In the first notice, OSHA announces the
application and provides a preliminary finding and, in the second
notice, the agency provides the final decision on the application.
These notices set forth the NRTL's scope of recognition or
modifications of that scope. OSHA maintains an informational web page
for each NRTL that details its scope of recognition. These pages are
available from the agency's website at http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/index.html.
    CSL submitted an application, dated January 2, 2018 (OSHA-2009-
0026-0079), to expand its recognition to include one additional test
standard. OSHA staff performed a detailed analysis of the application
packet and reviewed other pertinent information. OSHA did not perform
any on-site reviews in relation to this application.
    OSHA published the preliminary notice announcing CSL's expansion
application in the Federal Register on December 26, 2018 (83 FR 66311).
The agency requested comments by January 10, 2019, but received no
comments in response to this notice. OSHA now is proceeding with this
final notice to grant expansion of CSL's scope of recognition.
    To obtain or review copies of all public documents pertaining to
CSL's application, go to http://www.regulations.gov or contact the
Docket Office, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Room N-3653,
Washington, DC 20210. Docket No. OSHA-2009-0026 contains all materials
in the record concerning CSL's recognition.

II. Final Decision and Order

    OSHA staff examined CSL's expansion application, the capability to
meet the requirements of the test standards, and other pertinent
information. Based on a review of this evidence, OSHA finds that CSL
meets the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.7 for expansion of the
recognition, subject to the specified limitation, and conditions
listed. OSHA, therefore, is proceeding with this final notice to grant
CSL's scope of recognition. OSHA limits the expansion of CSL's
recognition to testing and certification of products for demonstration
of conformance to the test standard listed, in Table 1.

 Table 1--List of Appropriate Test Standard for Inclusion in CSL's NRTL
                          Scope of Recognition
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Test standard                     Test standard title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
UL 962....................................  Household and Commercial
                                             Furnishings.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OSHA's recognition of any NRTL for a particular test standard is
limited to equipment or materials for which OSHA standards require
third-party testing and certification before using them in the
workplace. Consequently, if a test standard also covers any products
for which OSHA does not require such testing and certification, a
NRTL's scope of recognition does not include these products.
    The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) may approve the
test standards listed above as American National Standards. However,
for convenience, the use of the designation of the standards-developing
organization for the standard as opposed to the ANSI designation may
occur. Under the NRTL Program's policy (see OSHA Instruction CPL 1-0.3,
Appendix C, paragraph XIV), any NRTL

recognized for a particular test standard may use either the
proprietary version of the test standard or the ANSI version of that
standard. Contact ANSI to determine whether a test standard is
currently ANSI-approved.

A. Conditions

    In addition to those conditions already required by 29 CFR 1910.7,
CSL must abide by the following conditions of the recognition:
    1. CSL must inform OSHA as soon as possible, in writing, of any
change of ownership, facilities, or key personnel, and of any major
change in its operations as a NRTL, and provide details of the
change(s);
    2. CSL must meet all the terms of its recognition and comply with
all OSHA policies pertaining to this recognition; and
    3. CSL must continue to meet the requirements for recognition,
including all previously published conditions on CSL's scope of
recognition, in all areas for which it has recognition.
    Pursuant to the authority in 29 CFR 1910.7, OSHA hereby expands the
scope of recognition of CSL, subject to the limitation and conditions
specified above.

III. Authority and Signature

    Loren Sweatt, Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, authorized the preparation of this notice.
Accordingly, the agency is issuing this notice pursuant to 29 U.S.C.
657(g)(2), Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (77 FR 3912, Jan. 25,
2012), and 29 CFR 1910.7.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on April 23, 2019.
Loren Sweatt,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2019-08433 Filed 4-25-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-26-P