[Federal Register: October 9, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 197)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 59573-59575]
[DOCID:fr09oc08-29]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-1081; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-143-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; ATR Model ATR72 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    Incomplete accomplishment instructions in SB [service bulletin]
ATR72-27-1059 original issue and Revision 1, failed to mention
installation of cotter pins to secure the self locking nuts after
re-installation of the modified Pitch Uncoupling Mechanism (PUM),
when connecting the elevator control linkage rods to the PUM input
levers and the PUM output rods to the elevator bellcranks (on both
sides).
    Because of the non-installation of these four cotter pins, the
fail-safe criteria of the design requirements on the pitch control
are no longer met. Such a failure could cause the loss of one self
locking nut and would result in the loss of pitch control on one
side--Captain or First Officer--or the loss of control of one
elevator surface. The symmetrical loss of two concerned self-locking
nuts could lead to a complete loss of the pitch control.
* * * * *
    The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 10,
2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-1081;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-143-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Emergency Airworthiness Directive 2008-0137-E, dated July 23, 2008
(referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    Incomplete accomplishment instructions in SB [service bulletin]
ATR72-27-1059 original issue and Revision 1, failed to mention
installation of cotter pins to secure the self locking nuts after
re-installation of the modified Pitch Uncoupling Mechanism (PUM),
when connecting the elevator control linkage rods to the PUM input
levers and the PUM output rods to the elevator bellcranks (on both
sides).
    Because of the non-installation of these four cotter pins, the
fail-safe criteria of the design requirements on the pitch control
are no longer met. Such a failure could cause the loss of one self
locking nut and would result in the loss of pitch control on one
side--Captain or First Officer--or the loss of control of one
elevator surface. The symmetrical loss of two concerned self-locking
nuts could lead to a complete loss of the pitch control.
    For the reasons stated above, this AD requires you to check
[for] the presence of the four cotter pins and [perform] their
installation if they are found to be missing.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    ATR has issued Avions de Transport Regional Service Bulletin ATR72-
27-1059, Revision 02, dated May 19, 2008. The actions described in this
service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But

we might have found it necessary to use different words from those in
the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. operators and is
enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 20 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 2 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $3,200, or $160 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

ATR-GIE Avions De Transport R[eacute]gional (Formerly Aerospatiale):
Docket No. FAA-2008-1081; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-143-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by November 10, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to ATR Model ATR72-101, -102, -201, -202, -
211, -212, and -212A airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in
any category; as identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this
AD, as applicable.
    (1) This AD applies to airplanes on which ATR Service Bulletin
ATR72-27-1059 was done in service at original issue, dated October
3, 2006, or Revision 01, dated March 14, 2007, except as provided by
paragraph (c)(2) of this AD.
    (2) This AD does not apply to airplanes on which Revision 02 of
ATR Service Bulletin ATR72-27-1059 was done in service, or ATR
Modification 05572 was done in production. Modification 05572 is
factory-incorporated on ATR72-212A airplanes from manufacturer's
serial number (MSN) 730.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
controls.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    Incomplete accomplishment instructions in SB [service bulletin]
ATR72-27-1059 original issue and Revision 1, failed to mention
installation of cotter pins to secure the self locking nuts after
re-installation of the modified Pitch Uncoupling Mechanism (PUM),
when connecting the elevator control linkage rods to the PUM input
levers and the PUM output rods to the elevator bellcranks (on both
sides).
    Because of the non-installation of these four cotter pins, the
fail-safe criteria of the design requirements on the pitch control
are no longer met. Such a failure could cause the loss of one self
locking nut and would result in the loss of pitch control on one
side--Captain or First Officer--or the loss of control of one
elevator surface. The symmetrical loss of two concerned self-locking
nuts could lead to a complete loss of the pitch control.
    For the reasons stated above, this AD requires you to check
[for] the presence of the four cotter pins and [perform] their
installation if they are found to be missing.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 10 days after the effective date of this AD: Verify
installation of the four cotter pins securing the nuts of the
fastener assemblies connecting the elevator control rods to the
elevator bellcranks as shown in Figure 1 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Avions de Transport Regional Service Bulletin ATR72-
27-1059, Revision 02, dated May 19, 2008.
    (2) If any cotter pin is found missing, before further flight,
install a new cotter pin with part number MS24665-164 by doing all
the applicable actions in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Avions de Transport Regional Service Bulletin ATR72-
27-1059, Revision 02, dated May 19, 2008.
    Note 1: For accessing the zone to be inspected, panels 325BL,
325BR, 327HL, 327KL, 327KR, 327JR, 327JL, 333BB, and 334BB may need
to be removed. AMM (airplane maintenance manual) 06-41-30 contains
removal procedures.
    (3) Before further flight after accomplishment of paragraph
(f)(2) of this AD, perform an operational test of the elevator
control as specified in paragraph 3.D., ``Tests,'' of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Avions de Transport Regional Service
Bulletin ATR72-27-1059, Revision 02, dated May 19, 2008. If any
elevator control rod fails the operational test, before further
flight, repair using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or its delegated agent).

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
    The MCAI does not specify corrective action for failure of the
operational test (binding or friction) specified in paragraph (f)(3)
of this AD. This AD requires using a method approved by the Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116 or the EASA

(or its delegated agent) and performing corrective action before
further flight.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to Attn: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-1137; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI EASA Emergency Airworthiness Directive 2008-
0137-E, dated July 23, 2008, and Avions de Transport Regional
Service Bulletin ATR72-27-1059, Revision 02, dated May 19, 2008, for
related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 3, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-23982 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

Issued by the Department of Transportation on July 5, 2006

   NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2006-24984

________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Joint Application of ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES, INC. (ASA) and

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. (Delta), filed 6/1/06 for:

XX  Exemption authority for both ASA and Delta for two years under 49
U.S.C. 40109 to provide the following service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail
between Los Angeles, California, on the one hand, and the following
Mexico points, on the other hand:  Culiacan, Hermosillo, La Paz, Loreto,
Los Mochis, Manzanillo, Mazatlan, Torreon, and Zacatecas.  The carriers
state that they will use the authority by placing Delta’s “DL”
code on the flights of ASA, which will operate the year-round service as
a “Delta Connection” carrier.  The applicants further request that
ASA be granted authority to combine this exemption authority with
ASA’s existing certificate and exemption authority, consistent with
applicable agreements.

Applicant rep: Robert E. Cohn<PHONE_NUMBER>  DOT Analyst: Linda Lundell
(202)366-2336

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX	Granted with respect to the Los Angeles-Culiacan, Los
Angeles-Hermosillo, Los Angeles-Loreto, Los Angeles-Manzanillo, Los
Angeles-Mazatlan, Los Angeles-La Paz, Los Angeles-Torreon, and Los
Angeles-Zacatecas exemption authority, including corresponding route
integration authority for ASA (subject to conditions, see below)

XX	Deferred with respect to the Los Angeles-Los Mochis request,
including corresponding route integration authority for ASA (see
remarks, below)

The above action granting exemption authority to ASA and Delta,
including corresponding route integration authority to ASA, was
effective when taken: July 5, 2006, through July 5, 2008.

The above action deferring on the ASA/Delta request for exemption
authority, including corresponding route integration authority for ASA,
was effective when taken: July 5, 2006.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

XX  The authority granted is consistent with the aviation agreement
between the United States and Mexico.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

	XX  The holder’s certificates of public convenience and necessity

	XX  Standard exemption conditions (attached)

Remarks:

Los Angeles-La Paz

Alaska filed an answer stating that it had no objection to the ASA/Delta
application as long as the Department grants contemporaneously
Alaska’s application, in Docket OST-2006-25107, for Los Angeles-La Paz
exemption authority (filed the same day as Alaska’s answer to
ASA/Delta’s application here).  ASA/Delta filed a reply to Alaska’s
answer, urging the Department to grant immediately ASA/Delta’s ripe
and otherwise unopposed application without awaiting expiration of the
answer period to Alaska’s application in Docket OST-2006-25107.
Alaska filed a surreply, stating that it had been advised that at least
one other U.S. carrier was considering seeking Los Angeles-La Paz
authority, which would result in a carrier selection proceeding for that
market.  As the ASA/Delta application (in Docket OST-2006-24984), and
the Alaska application (in Docket OST-2006-25107), are now ripe and no
other U.S. carrier has sought authority to serve the Los Angeles-La Paz
route, we are now able to grant contemporaneously the Los Angeles-La Paz
requests.  ASA and Alaska will be authorized to provide direct-carrier
service on the route, and Delta will be authorized to provide code-share
service on the route consistent with the aviation agreement.

Los Angeles-Los Mochis

We are deferring action on the carriers’ request to serve the Los
Angeles-Los Mochis market pending the necessary security clearances.

Conditions:  The U.S.-Mexico exemption authority granted is subject to
the dormancy notice requirements set forth in condition 7 of Appendix A
of Order 88-10-2.  The exemption authority granted to Delta is limited
to code-share services only.  Consistent with our standard policy, the
dormancy notice period will begin on December 1, 2006, for the Los
Angeles-Loreto and Los Angeles-La Paz markets and, for the other subject
markets, where the carriers have proposed a significantly later startup
date, we will require them to institute the proposed service on their
proposed startup dates, as follows:  February 1, 2007, for the Los
Angeles-Hermosillo and Los Angeles-Mazatlan services; March 6, 2007, for
the Los Angeles-Torreon services; March 13, 2007, for the Los
Angeles-Manzanillo and Los Angeles-Zacatecas services; and March 15,
2007, for the Los Angeles-Culiacan services.

The route integration authority granted to ASA is subject to the
condition that any service provided under this exemption shall be
consistent with all applicable agreements between the United States and
the foreign countries involved.  Furthermore, (a) nothing in the award
of the route integration authority granted should be construed as
conferring upon ASA rights (including fifth-freedom intermediate and/or
beyond rights) to serve markets where U.S. carrier entry is limited
unless ASA notifies the Department of its intent to serve such a market
and unless and until the Department has completed any necessary carrier
selection procedures to determine which carrier(s) should be authorized
to exercise such rights; and (b) should there be a request by any such
carrier to use the limited-entry route rights that are included in
ASA’s authority by virtue of the route integration authority granted
here, but that are not then being used by ASA, the holding of such
authority by route integration will not be considered as providing any
preference for ASA in a competitive carrier selection proceeding to
determine which carrier(s) should be entitled to use the authority at
issue.

The code-share operations conducted under this authorization are subject
to the following conditions:

The code-sharing operations conducted under this authority must comply
with 14 CFR 257 and with any amendment to the Department’s regulations
concerning code-share arrangements that may be adopted.  Notwithstanding
any provisions in the contract between the carriers, our approval here
is expressly conditioned upon the requirements that the subject foreign
air transportation be sold in the name of the carrier holding out such
service in computer reservation systems and elsewhere; that the carrier
selling such transportation (i.e., the carrier shown on the ticket)
accept responsibility for the entirety of the code-share journey for all
obligations established in its contract of carriage with the passenger;
and that the passenger liability of the operating carrier be unaffected.

(b)	 The authority granted here is specifically conditioned so that
neither ASA nor Delta shall give any force or effect to any contractual
provisions between themselves that are contrary to these conditions.

________________________________________________________________________
______

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department's regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the exemption services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted or deferred, we denied all requests in the
referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

				APPENDIX

U.S. Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the U.S. carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, including, but not limited to, 49 CFR Part 1544.
To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, the holder shall, before commencing any new service
(including charter flights) to or from a foreign airport, contact its
International Principal Security Inspector (IPSI) to advise the IPSI of
its plans and to find out whether the Transportation Security
Administration has determined that security is adequate to allow such
airport(s) to be served; and

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

05/2004

   Delta holds blanket route integration authority under Order 2006-1-1.

   Under the U.S.-Mexico aviation agreement, two U.S. carriers may be
designated to provide direct-carrier (own aircraft) service on the Los
Angeles-La Paz route, and up to ten U.S. carriers may be authorized to
provide code-share service on the Los Angeles-La Paz route.  Currently,
no U.S. carrier is authorized to provide direct-carrier or code-share
service in the market.


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 140 (Friday, July 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34561-34562]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15493]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER18-459-002.
    Applicants: Ohio Valley Electric Corporation, PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.

    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing RE: OATT, OA and
RAA OVEC Integration Effective Date to be effective 12/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 7/12/18.
    Accession Number: 20180712-5087.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-460-002.
    Applicants: Ohio Valley Electric Corporation, PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing RE: CTOA OVEC
Integration Effective Date to be effective 12/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 7/12/18.
    Accession Number: 20180712-5092.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-2004-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 3461 Mid-Kansas and City of
Anthony, KS Interconnection Agr to be effective 6/29/2018.
    Filed Date: 7/12/18.
    Accession Number: 20180712-5007.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-2005-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of Service
Agreement No. 4411; Queue No. AA1-059 to be effective 7/23/2018.
    Filed Date: 7/12/18.
    Accession Number: 20180712-5036.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-2006-000.
    Applicants: Interstate Power and Light Company, MidAmerican Energy
Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: IPL--MEC Remote LBA
Agreement to be effective 9/10/2018.
    Filed Date: 7/12/18.
    Accession Number: 20180712-5066.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-2008-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Tri-State Construct Agmt ?
Monolith Tap IC Rev 2 to be effective 9/11/2018.
    Filed Date: 7/12/18.
    Accession Number: 20180712-5096.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-2009-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to Attachment AE
to Enhance Regulation Deployment of DVERs to be effective 12/18/2018.
    Filed Date: 7/12/18.
    Accession Number: 20180712-5102.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-2010-000.
    Applicants: Old Dominion Electric Cooperative.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: ODEC Notice of Cancellation of
Rate Schedule and Request for Waiver to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 7/12/18.
    Accession Number: 20180712-5119.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-2011-000.
    Applicants: Terra-Gen Dixie Valley, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation to be
effective 7/13/2018.
    Filed Date: 7/12/18.
    Accession Number: 20180712-5128.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-2013-000.
    Applicants: Terra-Gen Dixie Valley, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: MBR Application to be
effective 7/13/2018.
    Filed Date: 7/12/18.
    Accession Number: 20180712-5171.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/2/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 12, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-15493 Filed 7-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24304-24305]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10187]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

In the Matter of Jet Neko, Inc., Order of Suspension of Trading

April 28, 2015.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Jet Neko, Inc. (CIK No. 1541371), a void Delaware corporation with its
principal place of business listed as Miyazaki, Japan with stock quoted
on OTC Link (previously, ``Pink Sheets'') operated by OTC Markets
Group, Inc. (``OTC Link'') under the ticker symbol NEKO, because it has
not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10 registration
statement on February 9, 2012. On February 5, 2015, a delinquency
letter was sent by the Division of Corporation Finance to Jet Neko,
Inc. requesting compliance with their periodic filing obligations, but
Jet Neko, Inc. did not receive the delinquency letter due to its
failure to maintain a valid address on file with the Commission as
required by Commission rules (Rule 301 of Regulation S-T, 17 CFR
232.301 and Section 5.4 of EDGAR Filer Manual).
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of Jet Neko, Inc.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the

securities of Jet Neko, Inc. is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m.
EDT on April 28, 2015, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 11, 2015.

    By the Commission.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-10187 Filed 4-28-15; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


April 12, 2005 NOTE SUBJECT: Evidence of Condensed Moisture for HWCs w/ Wet Scrubbers FROM: Bob Holloway EPA/ OSWER/ OSW/ HWMMD/ WTB TO: The Docket   OAR 2004 0022 On April 7, 2005, I called Mel Keener, Director for the Coalition for Responsible Waste Incineration ( CRWI), to ask if he could document by engineering information or data that there is condensed moisture in stack gas for HWCs controlled w/ wet scrubbers. This request is in response to comments from CRWI and Ely Lilly and Company ( Lilly) at proposal that water droplets are present at levels that could cause a low bias in HCl and Cl2 emissions measured w/ M26.

Mike Foster, Lilly, responded with the attachment. ATTACHMENT Message to Bob Holloway, EPA Via e mail 4/ 8/ 05 Mel passed along your request for examples of situations where there are water droplets in the stacks.

In my experience in performing stack tests, this situation is most prevalent on incinerators with simple scrubbing systems consisting of an adiabatic quench followed by a venturistyle scrubber. Adiabatic quench temperatures are typically 180 +/ 20 oF. At these temperatures, the dry gas carries large amounts of moisture as evidenced by the steepness of the saturation line on a high temperature psychrometric chart. This steepness also indicates that even slight amounts of cooling after the scrubber can result in the formation of significant free water in the gas stream. In a real stack with laminar flow ( which is what is desired for stack sampling), the cooling first takes place along the stack walls with the rate of heat transfer being a function of the stack gas temperature, the stack material, and the ambient temperature. Thus, it is easy to see how a saturated gas exiting a scrubber can develop water droplets on the way up the stack to the sampling probe. Often times the water will run down the stack wall and then drip across the stack intake opening where the high velocity stack gas will entrain the droplets.

During a stack test, the most obvious indication of the presence of such droplets is that the impingers in the sampling train will collect excessive amounts of water. Experienced stack samplers will, in such situations, calculate the stack gas moisture percentage based on the impinger catch, and then, as a check, perform a psychrometric calculation to determine the saturation moisture content ( i. e. the moisture content at 100 percent relative humidity). The lower moisture content calculated is then used in subsequent calculations to determine emission levels. In other words, if the moisture content determined from the impinger catch exceeds the saturation level, then water droplets were sucked into the sampling probe during the test run.

Lilly had an example of this phenomenon on our Trane incinerator at Clinton during a trial burn in 1986. ( This source is included in the HWC MACT database). The data are as follows: Run # Stack Temperature o F Measured Moisture (%) Saturation Moisture (%) Water Droplets? 6 1 170 43 41.3 Yes 6 2 160 33.9 32.7 Yes 6 3 161 34.5 33.4 Yes Making a cursory inspection of the sources in the database that CRWI perceives are the HCl/ Cl2 top performers, I note that sources 349, 478, and 706 are operating at the saturation level and very likely have water droplets in the stack. The data are as follows: Source/ Run# Stack Temperature o F Reported Moisture (%) Saturation Moisture Range (%)* Water Droplets Likely?

349C11/ 1 181 53.4 50.4 53.9 Yes 349C11/ 2 181 54.1 50.4 53.9 Yes 349C11/ 3 180 53.2 49.3 52.3 Yes 706C2/ 1 183 54.3 52.7 56.4 Yes 706C2/ 2 184 51.8 53.9 57.6 No 706C2/ 3 185 56 55.1 58.9 Yes 478C10/ 1 184 55.1 53.9 57.6 Yes 478C10/ 2 185 54.8 55.1 58.9 Yes 478C10/ 3 183 55.2 52.7 56.4 Yes * Range is due to saturation being a function of barometric pressure and static pressure which are not available in the database. Barometric pressure range of 29 to 31 inches assumed with 0.0 static pressure.

I hope this answers your question. Please contact me if you need further explanation.

Mike Foster Eli Lilly and Company 317 277 1094