VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4755 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1740 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 5. C TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   INITIAL COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR HYDROGEN CHLORIDE FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL SOLID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You have demonstrated initial compliance if . . .

1. Each new or reconstructed industrial commercial, or institutional boiler or process heater in the large solid fuel subcategory. a. Either no add on controls or an add on control other than a wet scrubber or a dry scrubber. i. 0.02 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input, measured using hydrogen chloride emissions concentration and Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific fuel chlorine content level for each test run over the three run performance test during which hydrogen chloride emissions did not exceed the emissions limit. b. A wet scrubber ......................... i. 0.02 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input, measured using hydrogen chloride emissions concentration and Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber for each test run over the three run performance test during which hydrogen chloride emissions did not exceed the emissions limit. c. A dry scrubber .......................... i. 0.02 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input, measured using hydrogen chloride emissions concentration and Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific sorbent injection rate of the dry scrubber for each test run over the three run performance test during which hydrogen chloride emissions did not exceed the emissions limit.

2. Each new or reconstructed industrial commercial, or institutional boiler or process heater in the limited use solid fuel subcategory or the small solid fuel subcategory. a. Either no add on controls or an add on control other than a wet scrubber or a dry scrubber. i. 0.02 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input, measured using hydrogen chloride emissions concentration and Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific fuel chlorine content level for each test run over the three run performance test during which hydrogen chloride emissions did not exceed the emissions limit.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1741 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 5. C TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   INITIAL COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR HYDROGEN CHLORIDE FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL SOLID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES   Continued For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You have demonstrated initial compliance if . . .

b. A wet scrubber ......................... i. 0.02 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input, measured using hydrogen chloride emissions concentration and Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber for each test run over the three run performance test during which hydrogen chloride emissions did not exceed the emissions limit. c. A dry scrubber .......................... i. 0.02 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb hydrogen chloride per chloride per MMBtu heat input, measured using hydrogen chloride emissions concentration and Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific sorbent injection rate of the dry scrubber for each test run over the three run performance test during which hydrogen chloride emissions did not exceed the emissions limit.

3. Each existing industrial, commercial institutional boiler or process heater in the large solid fuel subcategory. a. Either no add on controls or an add on control other than a wet scrubber or a dry scrubber. i. 0.09 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu per heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input, measured using hydrogen chloride emissions concentration and Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific fuel chlorine content level for each test run over the three run performance test during which hydrogen chloride emissions did not exceed the emissions limit. b. A wet scrubber ......................... i. 0.09 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input, measured using hydrogen chloride emissions concentration and Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber for each test run over the three run performance test during which hydrogen chloride emissions did not exceed the emissions limit.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1742 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 5. C TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   INITIAL COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR HYDROGEN CHLORIDE FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL SOLID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES   Continued For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You have demonstrated initial compliance if . . .

c. A dry scrubber .......................... i. 0.09 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input, measured using hydrogen chloride emissions concentration and Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific sorbent injection rate of the dry scrubber for each test run over the three run performance test during which hydrogen chloride emissions did not exceed the emissions limit.

As stated in § 63.7530, you must show initial compliance with the emission limitations for affected sources according to the following:

TABLE 5. D TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   INITIAL COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR HYDROGEN CHLORIDE FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL LIQUID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You have demonstrated initial compliance if . . .

1. Each new or reconstructed commercial or industrial, boiler or process heater in the liquid fuel subcategory ( boilers or process heaters in one of the liquid fuel subcategories that burn only fossil fuels and other gases and do not burn any residual oil are excluded from this requirement). a. Either no add on controls or an add on control other than a wet scrubber or a dry scrubber. i. 0.0005 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input, measured using hydrogen chloride emissions concentration and Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific fuel chlorine content level for each test run over the three run performance test during which hydrogen chloride emissions did not exceed the emissions limit. b. A wet scrubber ......................... i. 0.0005 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input, measured using hydrogen chloride emissions concentration and Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber for each test run over the three run performance test during which hydrogen chloride emissions did not exceed the emissions limit.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1743 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 5. D TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   INITIAL COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR HYDROGEN CHLORIDE FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL LIQUID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES   Continued For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You have demonstrated initial compliance if . . .

c. A dry scrubber .......................... i. 0.0005 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input, measured using hydrogen chloride emissions concentration and Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific sorbent injection rate of the dry scrubber for each test run over the three run performance test during which hydrogen chloride emissions did not exceed the emissions limit.

2. Each new or reconstructed industrial commercial, or institutional boiler or process heater in the large limited use liquid fuel subcategory or the small liquid fuel subcategory ( boilers or process heaters in one of the liquid fuel subcategories that burn only fossil fuels and other gases and do not burn any residual oil are excluded from this requirement). a. Either no add on controls or an add on control other than a web scrubber or a dry scrubber. i. 0.0009 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input, measured using hydrogen chloride emissions concentration and Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific fuel chlorine content level for each test run over the three run performance test during which hydrogen chloride emissions did not exceed the emissions limit.

3. Each new or reconstructed industrial commercial, or institutional boiler or process heater in the limited use liquid fuel subcategory or the small liquid fuel subcategory ( boilers or process heaters in one of the liquid fuel subcategories that burn only fossil fuels and other gases and do not burn any residual oil are excluded from this requirement). a. A wet scrubber ......................... i. 0.0009 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb hydrogen per MMBtu heat input, measured using hydrogen chloride emissions concentration and Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber for each test run over the three run performance test during which hydrogen chloride emissions did not exceed the emissions limit.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1744 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 5. D TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   INITIAL COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR HYDROGEN CHLORIDE FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL LIQUID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES   Continued For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You have demonstrated initial compliance if . . .

b. A dry scrubber .......................... i. 0.0009 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input, measured using hydrogen chloride emissions concentration and Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific sorbent injection rate of the dry scrubber for each test run over the three run performance test during which hydrogen chloride emissions did not exceed the emissions limit.

4. Each new or reconstructed industrial commercial, or institutional boiler or process heater in one of the liquid fuel subcategories that burns only liquid fossil fuels other than residual oil either alone or in combination with gaseous fuels. a. Any type of device .................... i. 0.0005 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input for units in the large liquid fuel subcategory or 0.0009 lb hydrogen chloride per MMBtu heat input for units in the limited use or small liquid fuel subcategories. ( 1) You submit a signed statement in the Notification of Compliance Status report required in § 63.7545( e) that indicates you burn only liquid fossil fuels other than residual oil either alone or in combination with gaseous fuels; and ( 2) You keep records, as required in § 63.7555, that demonstrate that you burn only liquid fossil fuels other than residual oil either alone or in combination with gaseous fuels.

As stated in § 63.7530, you must show initial compliance with the emission limitations for affected sources according to the following:

TABLE 5. E TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   INITIAL COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR MERCURY FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL SOLID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You have demonstrated initial compliance if . . .

1. Each new or reconstructed industrial commercial or institutional boiler or process heater in large solid fuel subcategory, the limited use solid fuel subcategory or the small solid fuel subcategory. a. Either no add on control or an add on control other than wet scrubber. i. 0.000003 lb merecury per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb mercury per MMBtu heat input, measured using mercury emissions concentration and sections 12.2 and 12.3 of Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific opacity level for each test run over the three run performance test during which mercury emissions did not exceed the emissions limit; or if the unit is controlled with a fabric filter, instead of establishing a site specific opacity level you keep records of the installation and calibration data and the manufacturer's certification of the bag leak detection system as required in § 63.7525( i).

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1745 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 5. E TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   INITIAL COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR MERCURY FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL SOLID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES   Continued For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You have demonstrated initial compliance if . . .

b. A wet scrubber ......................... i. 0.000003 lb mercury per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb mercury per MMBtu heat input, measured using mercury emissions concentration and sections 12.2 and 12.3 of Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific pressure drop and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber for each test run over the three run performance test during which mercury emissions did not exceed the emissions limit. c. A wet scrubber in combination with a fabric filter. i. 0.000003 lb mercury per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb mercury per MMBtu heat input, measured using mercury emissions concentrations and sections 12.2 and 12.3 of Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific pressure drop and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber for each test run over the three run performance test during which mercury emissions did not exceed the emissions limit; and ( 3) You keep records of the installation and calibration data and the manufacturers certification of the bag leak detection system as required in § 63.7525( i). d. A wet scrubber in combination with an electrostatic precipitator. i. 0.000003 lb mercury per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb mercury per MMBtu heat input, measured using mercury emissions concentration and sections 12.2 and 12.3 of Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific pressure drop and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber and the average secondary current and voltage or total power input of the electrostatic precipitator for each test run.

2. Each new or reconstructed industrial commercial, or institutional boiler or process heater in the large solid fuel subcategory, the limited use solid fuel subcategory or the small solid fuel subcategory ( this is an option for those units that can demonstrate compliance on the basis of fuel analysis without controls). a. Either no add on controls or an add on control for which you do not wish to take credit for reductions in mercury. i. 0.000003 lb mercury per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The calculated emissions using Equation 3 of § 63.7530( c) and converted to lb mercury per MMBtu heat input does exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of fuel analysis, calculations, and the maximum fuel mercury input at which you demonstrated compliance

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1746 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 5. E TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   INITIAL COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR MERCURY FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL SOLID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES   Continued For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You have demonstrated initial compliance if . . .

3. Each existing industrial, commercial or institutional boiler or process heater in the large solid fuel subcategory. a. Either no add on controls or an add on control other than a wet scrubber. i. 0.000007 lb mercury MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb mercury per MMBtu heat input, measured using mercury emissions concentration and sections 12.2 and 12.3 of Method 19 of appendix A over three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific opacity level for each test run over the 3 hour performance test during which mercury emissions did not exceed the emissions limit; or if the unit is controlled with a fabric filter, instead of establishing a site specific opacity level you keep records of the installation and calibration data and the manufacturer's certification of the bag leak detection system as required in § 63.7525( i). b. A wet scrubber ......................... i. 0.000007 lb mercury per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb mercury per MMBtu heat input, measured using mercury emissions concentration and sections 12.2 and 12.3 of Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific pressure drop and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber for each test run over the three run performance test during which mercury metals emissions did not exceed the emissions limit. c. A wet scrubber in combination with a fabric filter. i. 0.000007 lb mercury per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb mercury per MMBtu heat input, measured using mercury emissions concentration and sections 12.2 and 12.3 of Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific pressure drop and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber for each test run over the three run performance test during which mercury emissions did not exceed the emissions limit; and ( 3) You keep records of the installation and calibration data and the manufacturer's certification of the bag leak detection system as required in § 63.7525( i).

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1747 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 5. E TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   INITIAL COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR MERCURY FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL SOLID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES   Continued For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You have demonstrated initial compliance if . . .

d. A wet scrubber in combination with an electrostatic precipitator. i. 0.000007 lb mercury per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The average emissions in units of lb mercury per MMBtu heat input, measured using mercury emissions concentration and sections 12.2 and 12.3 of Method 19 of appendix A over the three run performance test period, do not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the average site specific pressure drop and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber and the average secondary current and voltage or total power input of the electrostatic precipitator for each test run.

4. Each existing industrial, commercial or institutional boiler or process heater in the large solid fuel subcategory ( this is an option for those units that can demonstrate compliance on the basis of fuel analysis without controls). a. Either no add on controls or an add on control for which you do not wish to take credit for reductions in mercury. i. 0.000007 per mercury per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) The calculated mercury emissions using Equation 3 of § 63.7530( c) and converted to lb mercury per MMBtu heat input does not exceed the emission limit; and ( 2) You keep a record of the fuel analysis, calculations, and maximum fuel mercury input at which you demonstrated compliance

As stated in § 63.7530, you must show initial compliance with the applicable work practice standards for affected sources according to the following:

TABLE 6 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   INITIAL COMPLIANCE WITH WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS For each . . . For the following work practice standard . . . You have demonstrated initial compliance if . . .

1. New or reconstructed industrial, commercial, or institutional boiler or process heater in the large solid fuel subcategory, the large liquid fuel subcategory, or the large gaseous fuel subcategory. a. Continuously monitor carbon monoxide emissions according to the procedures in § 63.7525( a) to maintain carbon monoxide emissions at or below an exhaust concentration of 400 ppm by volume on a dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen ( the averaging time shall be one calendar day). i. You have met work practice standard; and ii. As part of the Notification of Compliance Status, you submit the carbon monoxide emissions monitoring data recorded during the performance test collected according to the procedures required in § 63.7525( a); and iii. Report the maximum carbon monoxide emissions levels that occurred during the test that demonstrates the carbon monoxide concentrations were below the 400 ppm concentration.

2. New or reconstructed industrial, commercial, or institutional boiler or process heater in the limited use solid fuel subcategory, the limited use liquid fuel subcategory, or the limited use gaseous fuel subcategory. a. Continuously monitor carbon monoxide emissions according to the procedures in § 63.7525( a) to maintain carbon monoxide emissions at or below an exhaust concentration of 400 ppm by volume on a dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen. The average time shall be 1 calendar day. i. You have met the work practice standard; and ii. As part of the Notification of Compliance Status, you submit the carbon monoxide emissions monitoring data recorded during the performance test collected according to the procedures required in § 63.7525( a); and iii. Report the maximum carbon monoxide emissions levels that occurred during the test that demonstrates the carbon monoxide concentrations were below the 400 ppm concentration.

As stated in § 63.7540, you must show continuous compliance with the emission limitations for affected sources according to the following:

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4755 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1748 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 7. A TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL SOLID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You must demonstrate continuous compliance by . . .

1. Each new or reconstructed industrial commercial, or institutional boiler or process heater in the large solid fuel subcategory, the limited use solid fuel subcategory or the small solid fuel subcategory. a. Either no add on controls or an add on control other than a wet scrubber or dry scrubber. i. Opacity levels must not exceed the operating limit set during the PM or total selected metals and mercury performance tests and fuel chlorine content must not exceed the maximum operating limit set during the hydrogen chloride performance test according to the procedures in § 63.7530( c). ( 1) Collecting the opacity monitoring system data according to § § 63.7525( b) and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the opacity monitoring data to 6 minute averages and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour block average opacity levels at or below the limit established during the performance test; or if the unit is controlled with a fabric filter, instead of maintaining opacity maintaining the operation of the fabric filter such that the requirements in § 63.7540( a)( 9) are met; and ( 4) Keeping daily records of fuel use and following the procedures in § 63.7540( a) and, therefore, maintaining the fuel chlorine content level at or below the limit set during the performance test. b. A wet scrubber ......................... i. pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate must be greater than or equal to the minimum operating limits set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate monitoring system data according to § § 63.7525 and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the data to 3 hour block averages; and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour average pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate levels at or above the limits established during the performance test. c. A wet scrubber in combination with a fabric filter. i. pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate for the wet scrubber and pressure drop for the fabric filter must be greater than or equal to the minimum operating limits set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate monitoring system data for the wet scrubber and the pressure drop monitoring system data for the fabric filter according to § § 63.7525 and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the data to 3 hour block averages; and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour average pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber and the 3 hour average pressure drop of the fabric filter at or above the limits established during the performance test; and ( 4) Maintaining the fabric filter operation such that the requirements in 63.7540( a)( 9) are met.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1749 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 7. A TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL SOLID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES   Continued For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You must demonstrate continuous compliance by . . .

d. A wet scrubber in combination with an electrostatic precipitator. i. pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate for the wet scrubber and secondary current and voltage or total power input for the electrostatic precipitator must be greater than or equal to the minimum operating limits set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate monitoring system data for the wet scrubber and the secondary current and voltage monitoring system data or total power input data for the electrostatic precipitator according to § § 63.7525 and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the data to 3 hour block averages; and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour average pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber and the 3 hour average secondary current and voltage or total power input of the electrostatic precipitator at or above the limits established during the performance test. e. A dry scrubber .......................... i. Opacity levels must not exceed the operating limit set during the performance test and sorbent injection rate of the dry scrubber must be greater than or equal to the minimum operating limits set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the opacity monitoring system data according to § § 63.7525( b) and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the opacity monitoring data to 6 minute averages and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour block average opacity levels at or below the limit established during the performance test; and ( 4) Collecting the sorbent injection rate monitoring system data for the dry scrubber according to § § 63.7525 and 63.7535; and ( 5) Reducing the data to 3 hour block averages; and ( 6) Maintaining the 3 hour average sorbent injection rate level at or above the limits established during the performance test.

2. Each new or reconstructed industrial commercial, or institutional boiler or process heater in the large solid fuel subcategory, the limited use solid fuel subcategory or the small solid fuel subcategory that is complying with the alternative total selected metals emission limit instead of the particulate matter emission limit ( this is an option for those that can demonstrate compliance on the basis of fuel analysis without controls). Either no add on controls or an add on control for which you do not wish to take credit for reductions in total selected metals. Fuel total selected metals content must not exceed the operating limit set during the performance test according to the provisions in § 63.7530( a). Keeping daily records of fuel use and follow the procedures in § 63.7540( a) and, therefore, maintain the fuel total selected metals content level at or below the limit set during the performance test.

3. Each new or reconstructed industrial commercial, or institutional boiler or process heater in the large solid fuel subcategory, the limited use solid fuel subcategory or the small solid fuel subcategory that can demonstrate compliance with the mercury emission limit on the basis of fuel analysis without controls). Either no add on controls or an add on control for which you do not wish to take credit for reductions in mercury. Fuel mercury content must not exceed the operating limit set during the performance test according to the provisions in § 63.7530)( a). Keeping daily records of fuel use and follow the procedures in § 63.7540( a) and, therefore, maintain the fuel mercury content level at or below the limit set during the performance test.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1750 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 7. A TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL SOLID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES   Continued For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You must demonstrate continuous compliance by . . .

4. Each existing industrial, commercial or institutional boiler or process heater in the large solid fuel subcategory. a. Either no add on controls or an add on control other than a wet scrubber or dry scrubber. i. Opacity levels must not exceed the operating limit set during the PM or total selected metals and mercury performance test and fuel chlorine content must not exceed the maximum operating limit set during the hydrogen chloride performance test according to the procedures in § 63.7530( c). ( 1) Collecting the opacity monitoring system data according to § § 63.7525( b) and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the opacity monitoring data to 6 minute averages and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour block average opacity levels at or below the limit established during the performance test; or if the unit is controlled with a fabric filter, instead of maintaining opacity maintaining the operation of the fabric filter such that the requirements in § 63.7540( a)( 9) are met; and ( 4) Keeping daily records of fuel use and following the procedures in § 63.7540( a) and, therefore, maintaining the fuel chlorine content level at or below the limit set during the performance test. b. A wet scrubber ......................... i. pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate must be greater than or equal to the minimum operating limits set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate monitoring system data according to § § 63.7525 and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the data to 3 hour block averages; and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour average pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate levels at or above the limits established during the performance test. c. A wet scrubber in combination with a fabric filter. i. pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate for the wet scrubber and pressure drop for the fabric filter must be greater than or equal to minimum operating limits set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate monitoring system data for the wet scrubber and the pressure drop monitoring system data for the fabric filter according to § § 63.7525 and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducting the data to 3 hour block averages; and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour average pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber and the 3 hour average pressure drop of the fabric filter at or above the limits established during the performance test; and ( 4) Maintaining the fabric filter operation such that the requirements in § 63.7540( a)( 9) are met.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1751 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 7. A TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL SOLID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES   Continued For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You must demonstrate continuous compliance by . . .

d. A wet scrubber in combination with an electrostatic precipitator. i. pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate for the wet scrubber and secondary current and voltage or total power input for the electrostatic precipitator must be greater than or equal to the minimum operating limits set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate monitoring system data for the wet scrubber and the secondary current and voltage monitoring system data or total power input data for electrostatic precipitator according to § § 63.7525 and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the data to 3 hour block averages; and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour average pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber and the 3 hour average secondary current and voltage or total power input of the electrostatic precipitator at or above the limits established during the performance test. e. A dry scrubber .......................... i. Opacity levels must not exceed the operating limit set during the performance test and sorbent injection rate of the dry scrubber must be greater than or equal to the minimum operating limits set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the opacity monitoring system data according to § § 63.7525( b) and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the opacity monitoring data to 6 minute averages and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour block average opacity levels at or below the limit established during the performance test; and ( 4) Collecting the sorbent injection rate monitoring system data for the dry scrubber according to § § 63.7525 and 63.7535; and ( 5) Reducing the data to 3 hour block averages; and ( 6) Maintaining the 3 hour average sorbent injection rate levels at or above the limits established during the performance test.

5. Each existing industrial, commercial or institutional boiler or process heater in the large solid fuel subcategory that is complying with the alternative total selected metals emission limit instead of the particulate matter emission limit ( this is an option for those that can demonstrate compliance on the basis of fuel analysis without controls). Either no add on controls or an add on control for which you do not wish to take credit for reductions in total selected metals. Fuel total selected metals content must not exceed the operating limit set during the performance test according to the provisions in § 63.7530( a) keeping daily records of fuel use and following the procedures in § 63.7540( a) and, therefore, maintaining the fuel total selected metals content level at or below the limit set during the performance tests.

6. Each existing industrial, commercial or institutional boiler or process heater in the large solid fuel subcategory that can demonstrate compliance with the mercury emission limit on the basis of fuel analysis without controls. Either no add on controls or an add on control for which you do not wish to take credit for reductions in mercury. Fuel mercury content must not exceed the operating limit set during the performance test according to the provisions in § 63.7530( a). Keeping daily records of fuel use and following the procedures in § 63.7540( a) and, therefore, maintaining the fuel mercury content level at or below the limit set during the performance test.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1752 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 7. A TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL SOLID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES   Continued For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You must demonstrate continuous compliance by . . .

7. Each existing industrial, commercial or institutional boiler or process heater in the limited use solid fuel subcategory. a. Either no add on controls or an add on control other than a wet scrubber or dry scrubber. i. Opacity levels must not exceed the operating limit set during the PM or total selected metals performance test according to the procedures in § 63.7530( c). ( 1) Collecting the opacity monitoring system data according to § § 63.7525( b) and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the opacity monitoring data to 6 minute averages and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour block average opacity levels at or below the limit established during the performance test; and ( 4) If the unit is controlled with a fabric filter, maintaining the operation of the fabric filter such that the requirements in § 63.7540( a)( 9) are met. b. A wet scrubber ......................... i. Pressure drop and liquid flowrate must be greater than or equal to the minimum operating limits set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the pressure drop and liquid flow rate monitoring system data according to § § 63.7525 and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the data to 3 hour block averages; and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour average pressure drop and liquid flow rate levels at or above the limits established during the performance test. c. A wet scrubber in combination with a fabric filter. i. Pressure drop and liquid flowrate for the wet scrubber and pressure drop for the fabric filter must be greater than or equal to the minimum operating limits set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the pressure drop and liquid flow rate monitoring system data for the wet scrubber and the pressure drop monitoring system data for the fabric filter according to § § 63.7525 and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the data to 3 hour block averages; and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour average pressure drop and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber and the 3 hour average pressure drop of the fabric filter at or above the limits established during the performance test; and ( 4) Maintaining the fabric filter operation such that the requirements in § 63.7540( a)( 9) are met. d. A wet scrubber in combination with an electrostatic precipitator. i. Pressure drop and liquid flowrate for the wet scrubber and secondary current and voltage or total power input for the electrostatic precipitator must be greater than or equal to the minimum operating limits set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the pressure drop and liquid flow rate monitoring system data for the wet scrubber and the secondary current and voltage monitoring system data or total power input data for the electrostatic precipitator according to § § 63.7525 and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the data to 3 hour block averages; and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour average pressure drop and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber and the 3 hour average secondary current and voltage or total power input of the electrostatic precipitator at or above the limits established during the performance test.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1753 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 7. A TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL SOLID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES   Continued For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You must demonstrate continuous compliance by . . .

e. A dry scrubber .......................... i. Opacity levels must not exceed the operating limit set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the opacity monitoring system data according to § § 63.7525( b) and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the opacity monitoring data to 6 minute averages and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour block average opacity levels at or below the limit established during the performance test.

8. Each existing industrial commercial and institutional boiler or process in the limited use solid fuel subcategory that is complying with the alternative total selected metals emission limit instead of the particulate matter emission limit ( this is an option for those that can demonstrate compliance on the basis of fuel analysis without controls). Either no add on controls or an add on control for which you do not wish to take credit for reductions in total selected metals. Fuel total selected metals content must not exceed the operating limit set during the performance test according to the provisions in § 63.7530( a). Keeping daily records of fuel use and following the procedures in § 63.7540( a) and, therefore, maintaining the fuel total selected metals content level at or below the limit set during the performance test.

As stated in § 63.7540, you must show continuous compliance with the emission limitation for affected sources according to the following:

TABLE 7. B TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL LIQUID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You must demonstrate continuous compliance by. . .

1. Each new or reconstructed industrial commercial, or institutional boiler or process heater in the large liquid fuel subcategory, the limited use liquid fuel subcategory or the small liquid fuel subcategory ( boilers or process heaters in one of the liquid fuel subcategories that burn only fossil fuels and gases and do not burn any residual oil are excluded from this requirement). a. Either no add on controls or an add on control other than a wet scrubber or a dry scrubber. i. Opacity levels must not exceed the operating limit set during the performance test and fuel chlorine content must not exceed the maximum operating limit set during the performance test according to the procedures in § 63.7530( c). ( 1) Collecting the opacity monitoring system data according to § § 63.7525( b) and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the opacity monitoring data to 6 minute averages and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour block average opacity levels at or below the limit established during the performance test; or if the unit is controlled with a fabric filter, instead of maintaining opacity maintaining the operation of the fabric filter such that the requirements in § 63.7540( a)( 9) are met; and ( 4) Keeping daily records of fuel use and following the procedures in § 63.7540( a) and, therefore, maintaining the fuel chlorine content level at or below the limit set during the performance test. b. A wet scrubber ......................... i. pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate must be greater than or equal to the minimum operating limits set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate monitoring system data according to § § 63.7525 and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the data to 3 hour block averages; and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour average pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate levels at or above the limits established during the performance test.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 21: 19 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1754 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 7. B TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL LIQUID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES   Continued For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You must demonstrate continuous compliance by. . .

c. A wet scrubber in combination with a fabric filter. i. pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate for the wet scrubber and pressure drop for the fabric filter must be greater than or equal to the minimum operating limits set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate monitoring system data for the wet scrubber and the pressure drop monitoring system data for the fabric filter according to § § 63.7525 and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the data to 3 hour block averages; and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour average pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber and the 3 hour average pressure drop of the fabric filter at or above the limits established during the performance test; and ( 4) Maintaining the operation of the fabric filter such that the requirements in § 63.7540( a)( 9) are met.

d. A wet scrubber in combination with an electrostatic precipitator. i. pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate for the wet scrubber and secondary current and voltage or total power input for the electrostatic precipitator must be greater than or equal to the minimum operating limits set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate monitoring system data for the wet scrubber and the secondary current and voltage monitoring system data or total power input data for the electrostatic precipitator according to § § 63.7525 and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the data to 3 hour block averages; and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour average pH, pressure drop, and liquid flow rate of the wet scrubber and the 3 hour average secondary current and voltage or total power input of the electrostatic precipitator at or above the limits established during the performance test. e. A dry scrubber .......................... i. Sorbent injection rate of the dry scrubber must be greater than or equal to the minimum operating limits set during the performance test and opacity levels must not exceed the operating limit set during the performance test. ( 1) Collecting the sorbent injection rate monitoring system data according to § § 63.7525 and 63.7535; and ( 2) Reducing the data to 3 hour block averages; and ( 3) Maintaining the 3 hour average sorbent injection rate levels at or above the limits established during the performance test; and ( 4) Collecting the opacity monitoring system data according to § 63.7525( b) and reducing the opacity monitoring data to 6 minute averages and maintaining the 3 hour average opacity levels at or below the limit established during the performance test.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1755 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 7. B TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR BOILERS OR PROCESS HEATERS IN LARGE, LIMITED USE, OR SMALL LIQUID FUEL SUBCATEGORIES   Continued For . . . That is controlled with . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You must demonstrate continuous compliance by. . .

2. Each new or reconstructed industrial commercial, or institutional boiler or process heater in one of the liquid fuel subcategories that burns only liquid fossil fuels other than residual oil either alone or in combination with gaseous fuels. a. Any type of device .................... i. 0.03 lb particulate matter per MMBtu heat input. ( 1) Including a signed statement in each semiannual compliance report required in § 63.7550 that indicates you burned only liquid fossil fuels other than residual oil either alone or in combination with gaseous fuels during the compliance period; and ( 2) By keeping records, as required in § 63.7555, that demonstrate that you burn only liquid fossil fuels other than residual oil either alone or in combination with gaseous fuels.

As stated in § 63.7540, you must show continuous compliance with the applicable work practice standards for affected sources according to the following:

TABLE 8 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE WITH WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS For the following work practice standard . . . You must demonstrate continuous compliance by . . .

1. Carbon monoxide limit for new or reconstructed industrial, commercial or institutional boilers or process heaters in the large solid fuel subcategory, the large liquid fuel subcategory, the large gaseous fuel subcategory, the limited use solid fuel subcategory, the limited use liquid fuel subcategory, or the limited use gaseous fuel subcategory. a. Continuously monitoring carbon monoxide levels according to § § 63.7525( a) and 63.7535; and b. Maintaining a carbon monoxide level below an exhaust concentration of 400 ppm by volume on a dry basis at all times except during startup, shutdown, or malfunction; and c. Keeping records of carbon monoxide levels as required in § 63.7555( b). The averaging period shall be a calendar day.

As stated in § 63.7550, you must comply with the following requirements for reports:

TABLE 9 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   REQUIREMENTS FOR REPORTS You must submit a( n) The report must contain . . . You must submit the report . . .

1. Compliance report .......................................... a. Information required in § 63.7550( c)( 1)   ( 11); and Semiannually according to the requirements in § 63.7550( b). b. If there are no deviations from any emission limitation ( emission limit and operating limit) that applies to you and there are no deviations from the requirements for work practice standards in Table 8 to this subpart that apply to you, a statement that there were no deviations from the emission limitations and work practice standards during the reporting period. If there were no periods during which the continuous monitoring systems, including continuous emissions monitoring system, continuous opacity monitoring system, and operating parameter monitoring systems, were out of control as specified in § 63.8( c)( 7), a statement that there were no periods during which the continuous monitoring systems were out ofcontrol during the reporting period; and See item 1. a of this table.

c. If you have a deviation from any emission limitation ( emission limit and operating limit) or work practice standard during the reporting period, the report must contain the information in § 63.7550( d). If there were periods during which the continuous monitoring systems, including continuous emissions monitoring system, continuous opacity monitoring system, and operating parameter monitoring systems, were out of control, as specified in § 63.8( c)( 7), the report must contain the information in § 63.7550( e); and See item 1. a of this table.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1756 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 9 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   REQUIREMENTS FOR REPORTS   Continued You must submit a( n) The report must contain . . . You must submit the report . . .

d. If you had a startup, shutdown, or malfunction during the reporting period and you took actions consistent with your startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, the compliance report must include the information in § 63.10( d)( 5)( i). See item 1. a of this table.

2. An immediate startup, shutdown, and malfunction report if you had a startup, shutdown or malfunction during the reporting period that is not consistent with your startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan. a. Actions taken for the event and the information in § 63.10( d)( 5)( ii). i. By fax or telephone within 2 working days after starting actions inconsistent with the plan; and ii. By letter within 7 working days after the end of the event unless you have made alternative arrangements with the permitting authority. ( § 63.10( d)( 5)( ii)).

As stated in § 63.7565, you must comply with the applicable General Provisions according to the following:

TABLE 10 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART DDDDD Citation Subject Brief description Explanation § 63.1 ....................................... Applicability ............................................ Initial Applicability Determination; Applicability After Standard Established; Permit Requirements; Extensions Notifications. Yes.

§ 63.2 ....................................... Definitions .............................................. Definitions for part 63 standards ................................. Yes.

§ 63.3 ....................................... Units and Abbreviations ......................... Units and abbreviations for part 63 standards ............ Yes.

§ 63.4 ....................................... Prohibited Activities ................................ Prohibited Activities; Compliance date; Circumvention Severability. Yes.

§ 63.5 ....................................... Construction/ Reconstruction .................. Applicability; applications; approvals ........................... Yes.

§ 63.6( a) .................................. Applicability ............................................ i. GP apply unless compliance extension; and Yes. ii. GP apply to area sources that become major ........ Yes.

§ 63.6( b)( 1)   ( 4) ........................ Compliance Dates for New and Reconstructed sources. Standards apply at effective date; 3 years after effective date; upon startup; 10 years after construction or reconstruction commences for 112( f). Yes.

§ 63.6( b)( 5) .............................. Notification ............................................. Must notify if commenced construction or reconstruction after proposal. Yes.

§ 63.6( b)( 6) .............................. [ Reserved].

§ 63.6( b)( 7) .............................. Compliance Dates for New and Reconstructed Area Sources That Become Major. Area sources that become major must comply with major source standards immediately upon becoming major, regardless of whether required to comply when they were an area source. Yes.

§ 63.6( c)( 1)   ( 2) ........................ Compliance Dates for Existing Sources i. Comply according to date in subpart, which must be no later than 3 years after effective date; and Yes.

ii. For 112( f) standards, comply within 90 days of effective date unless compliance extension. Yes.

§ 63.6( c)( 3)   ( 4) ........................ [ Reserved].

§ 63.6( c)( 5) .............................. Compliance Dates for Existing Area Sources That Become Major. Area sources that become major must comply with major source standards by date indicated in subpart or by equivalent time period ( for example, 3 years). Yes.

§ 63.6( d) .................................. [ Reserved].

§ 63.6( e)( 1)   ( 2) ........................ Operation & Maintenance ...................... i. Operate to minimize emissions at all times; and Yes.

ii. Correct malfunctions as soon as practicable; and Yes. iii. Operation and maintenance requirements independently enforceable information Administrator will use to determine if operation and maintenance requirements were met. Yes.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1757 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 10 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART DDDDD   Continued Citation Subject Brief description Explanation § 63.6( e)( 3) .............................. Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Plan ( SSMP). Requirement for SSM and startup, shutdown, malfunction plan. Content of SSMP ......................................................... Yes.

§ 63.6( f)( 1) ............................... Compliance Except During SSM ........... Comply with emission standards at all times except during SSM. Yes.

§ 63.6( f)( 2)   ( 3) ......................... Methods for Determining Compliance ... Compliance based on performance test, operation and maintenance plans, records, inspection. Yes.

§ 63.6( g)( 1)   ( 3) ........................ Alternative Standard .............................. Procedures for getting an alternative standard ........... Yes.

§ 63.6( h)( 1) .............................. Compliance with Opacity/ VE Standards Comply with opacity/ VE emission limitations at all times except during SSM. Yes.

§ 63.6( h)( 2)( i) ........................... Determining Compliance with Opacity/ Visible Emission ( VE) Standards. If standard does not state test method, use Method 9 for opacity and Method 22 for VE. No.

§ 63.6( h)( 2)( ii) .......................... [ Reserved].

§ 63.6( h)( 2)( iii) ......................... Using Previous Tests to Demonstrate Compliance with Opacity/ VE Standards Criteria for when previous opacity/ VE testing can be used to show compliance with this rule. Yes.

§ 63.6( h)( 3) .............................. [ Reserved].

§ 63.6( h)( 4) .............................. Notification of Opacity/ VE Observation Date. Notify Administrator of anticipated date of observation No.

§ 63.6( h)( 5)( i), ( iii)   ( v) .............. Conducting Opacity/ VE Observations ... Dates and Schedule for conducting opacity/ VE observations No.

§ 63.6( h)( 5)( ii) .......................... Opacity Test Duration and Averaging Times. Must have at least 3 hours of observation with thirty, 6 minute averages. No.

§ 63.6( h)( 6) .............................. Records of Conditions During Opacity/ VE Observations. Keep records available and allow Administrator to inspect No.

§ 63.6( h)( 7)( i) ........................... Report continuous opacity monitoring system Monitoring Data from Performance Test. Submit continuous opacity monitoring system data with other performance test data. Yes.

§ 63.6( h)( 7)( ii) .......................... Using continuous opacity monitoring system instead of Method 9. Can submit continuous opacity monitoring system data instead of Method 9 results even if rule requires Method 9, but must notify Administrator before performance test. No.

§ 63.6( h)( 7)( iii) ......................... Averaging time for continuous opacity monitoring system during performance test. To determine compliance, must reduce continuous opacity monitoring system data to 6 minute averages Yes.

§ 63.6( h)( 7)( iv) ......................... Continuous opacity monitoring system requirements. Demonstrate that continuous opacity monitoring system performance evaluations are conducted according to § § 63.8( e), continuous opacity monitoring system are properly maintained and operated according to 63.8( c) and data quality as § 63.8( d). Yes.

§ 63.6( h)( 7)( v) .......................... Determining Compliance with Opacity/ VE Standards. Continuous opacity monitoring system is probative but not conclusive evidence of compliance with opacity standard, even if Method 9 observation shows otherwise. Requirements for continuous opacity monitoring system to be probative evidence proper maintenance, meeting PS 1, and data have not been altered. Yes.

§ 63.6( h)( 8) .............................. Determining Compliance with Opacity/ VE Standards. Administrator will use all continuous opacity monitoring system, Method 9, and Method 22 results, as well as information about operation and maintenance to determine compliance. Yes.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1758 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 10 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART DDDDD   Continued Citation Subject Brief description Explanation § 63.6( h)( 9) .............................. Adjusted Opacity Standard .................... Procedures for Administrator to adjust an opacity standard. Yes.

§ 63.6( i)( 1)   ( 14) ....................... Compliance Extension ........................... Procedures and criteria for Administrator to grant compliance extension. Yes.

§ 63.6( j) .................................... Presidential Compliance Exemption ...... President may exempt source category from requirement to comply with rule. Yes.

§ 63.7( a)( 1) .............................. Performance Test Dates ........................ Dates for Conducting Initial Performance Testing and Other Compliance Demonstrations. Yes.

§ 63.7( a)( 2)( i) ........................... Performance Test Dates ........................ New source with initial startup date before effective date has 180 days after effective date to demonstrate compliance. Yes.

§ 63.7( a)( 2)( ii) .......................... Performance Test Dates ........................ New source with initial startup date after effective date has 180 days after initial startup date to demonstrate compliance. Yes.

§ 63.7( a)( 2)( iii) ......................... Performance Test Dates ........................ i. Existing source subject to standard established pursuant to 112( d) has 180 days after compliance date to demonstrate compliance; and No.

ii. Existing source with startup date after effective date has 180 days after startup to demonstrate compliance. Yes.

§ 63.7( a)( 2)( iv) ......................... Performance Test Dates ........................ Existing source subject to standard established pursuant to 112( f) has 180 days after compliance date to demonstrate compliance. No.

§ 63.7( a)( 2)( v) .......................... Performance Test Dates ........................ Existing source that applied for extension of compliance has 180 days after termination date of extension to demonstrate compliance. Yes.

§ 63.7( a)( 2)( vi) ......................... Performance Test Dates ........................ New source subject to standard established pursuant to 112( f) that commenced construction after proposal date of 112( d) standard but before proposal date of 112( f) standard, has 180 days after compliance date to demonstrate compliance. No.

§ 63.7( a)( 2)( vii   viii) .................. [ Reserved].

§ 63.7( a)( 2)( ix) ......................... Performance Test Dates ........................ i. New source that commenced construction between proposal and promulgation dates, when promulgated standard is more stringent than proposed standard, has 180 days after effective date or 180 days after startup of source, whichever is later, to demonstrate compliance; and. Yes.

ii. If source initially demonstrates compliance with less stringent proposed standard, it has 3 years and 180 days after the effective date of the standard or 180 days after startup of source, whichever is later, to demonstrate compliance with promulgated standard. No.

§ 63.7( a)( 3) .............................. Section 114 Authority ............................. Administrator may require a performance test under CAA Section 114 at any time. Yes.

§ 63.7( b)( 1) .............................. Notification of Performance Test ........... Must notify Administrator 60 days before the test ...... Yes.

§ 63.7( b)( 2) .............................. Notification of Rescheduling .................. If rescheduling a performance test is necessary, must notify Administrator 5 days before scheduled date of rescheduled date. Yes.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1759 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 10 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART DDDDD   Continued Citation Subject Brief description Explanation § 63.7( c) ................................... Quality Assurance/ Test Plan ................. Requirement to submit site specific test plan 60 days before the test or on date Administrator agrees with: i. Test plan approval procedures; and ii. Performance audit requirements; and iii. Internal and External QA procedures for testing. Yes.

§ 63.7( d) .................................. Testing Facilities .................................... Requirements for test facilities .................................... Yes.

§ 63.7( e)( 1) .............................. Conditions for Conducting Performance Tests. i. Performance tests must be conducted under representative conditions; and No.

ii. Cannot conduct performance tests during SSM; and Yes.

iii. Not a deviation to exceed standard during SSM; and Yes.

iv. Upon request of Administrator, make available records necessary to determine conditions of performance tests Yes.

§ 63.7( e)( 2) .............................. Conditions for Conducting Performance Tests. Must conduct according to rule and EPA test methods unless Administrator approves alternative. Yes.

§ 63.7( e)( 3) .............................. Test Run Duration .................................. i. Must have three separate test runs; and Yes. ii. Compliance is based on arithmetic mean of three runs; and Yes.

iii. Conditions when data from an additional test run can be used Yes.

§ 63.7( f) ................................... Alternative Test Method ......................... Procedures by which Administrator can grant approval to use an alternative test method. Yes.

§ 63.7( g) .................................. Performance Test Data Analysis ........... i. Must include raw data in performance test report; and Yes.

ii. Must submit performance test data 60 days after end of test with the Notification of Compliance Status and Yes.

iii. Keep data for 5 years ............................................. Yes.

§ 63.7( h) .................................. Waiver of Tests ...................................... Procedures for Administrator to waive performance test. Yes.

§ 63.8( a)( 1) .............................. Applicability of Monitoring Requirements Subject to all monitoring requirements in standard .... Yes.

§ 63.8( a)( 2) .............................. Performance Specifications ................... Performance Specifications in appendix B of part 60 apply. Yes.

§ 63.8( a)( 3) .............................. [ Reserved].

§ 63.8( a)( 4) .............................. Monitoring with Flares ............................ Unless your rule says otherwise, the requirements for flares in § 63.11 apply. No.

§ 63.8( b)( 1)( i)   ( ii) ..................... Monitoring .............................................. Must conduct monitoring according to standard unless Administrator approves alternative. Yes.

§ 63.8( b)( 1)( iii) ......................... Monitoring .............................................. Flares not subject to this section unless otherwise specified in relevant standard. No.

§ 63.8( b)( 2)   ( 3) ........................ Multiple Effluents and Multiple Monitoring Systems. i. Specific requirements for installing monitoring systems and Yes.

ii. Must install on each effluent before it is combined and before it is released to the atmosphere unless Administrator approves otherwise; and Yes.

iii. If more than one monitoring system on an emission point, must report all monitoring system results unless one monitoring system is a backup. Yes.

§ 63.8( c)( 1) .............................. Monitoring System Operation and Maintenance Maintain monitoring system in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices. Yes.

§ 63.8( c)( 1)( i) ........................... Routine and Predictable SSM ............... i. Follow the SSM plan for routine repairs. Keep parts for routine repairs readily available. Yes.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1760 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 10 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART DDDDD   Continued Citation Subject Brief description Explanation ii. Reporting requirements for SSM when action is described in SSM plan. Yes.

§ 63.8( c)( 1)( ii) .......................... SSM not in SSMP .................................. Reporting requirements SSM when action is not described in SSM plan. Yes.

§ 63.8( c)( 1)( iii) ......................... Compliance with Operation and Maintenance Requirements. i. How Administrator determines if source complying with operation and maintenance requirements; and Yes.

ii. Review of source O& M procedures, records, Manufacturer's instructions, recommendations, and inspection of monitoring system. Yes.

§ 63.8( c)( 2)   ( 3) ........................ Monitoring System Installation ............... i. Must install to get representative emission and parameter measurements; and Yes.

ii. Must verify operational status before or at performance test. Yes.

§ 63.8( c)( 4) .............................. Continuous Monitoring System ( CMS) Requirements. Continuous monitoring systems must be operating except during breakdown, out of control, repair, maintenance, and high level calibration drifts. No.

§ 63.8( c)( 4)( i) ........................... Continuous Monitoring System ( CMS) Requirements. Continuous opacity monitoring system must have a minimum of one cycle of sampling and analysis for each successive 10 second period and one cycle of data recording for each successive 6 minute period Yes.

§ 63.8( c)( 4)( ii) .......................... Continuous Monitoring System ( CMS) Requirements. Continuous emissions monitoring system must have a minimum of one cycle of operation for each successive 15 minute period. No.

§ 63.8( c)( 7)   ( 8) ........................ Continuous monitoring systems Requirements Out of control periods, including reporting .................. Yes.

§ 63.8( d) .................................. Continuous monitoring systems Quality Control. i. Requirements for continuous monitoring systems quality control, including calibration, etc.; and Yes.

ii. Must keep quality control plan on record for the life of the affected source. Keep old versions for 5 years after revisions. Yes.

§ 63.8( e) .................................. Continuous monitoring systems Performance Evaluation. Notification, performance evaluation test plan, reports Yes.

§ 63.8( f)( 1)   ( 5) ......................... Alternative Monitoring Method ............... Procedures for Administrator to approve alternative monitoring. Yes.

§ 63.8( f)( 6) ............................... Alternative to Relative Accuracy Test .... Procedures for Administrator to approve alternative relative accuracy tests for continuous emissions monitoring system. No.

§ 63.8( g)( 1)   ( 4) ........................ Data Reduction ...................................... i. Continuous opacity monitoring system 6 minute averages calculated over at least 36 evenly spaced data points; and Yes.

ii. Continuous emissions monitoring system 1 hour averages computed over at least 4 equally spaced data points. Yes.

§ 63.8( g)( 5) .............................. Data Reduction ...................................... Data that cannot be used in computing averages for continuous emissions monitoring system and continuous opacity monitoring system. No.

§ 63.9( a) .................................. Notification Requirements ...................... Applicability and State Delegation ............................... Yes.

§ 63.9( b)( 1)   ( 5) ........................ Initial Notifications .................................. i. Submit notification 120 days after effective date; and Yes.

ii. Notification of intent to construct/ reconstruct; and Yes. iii. Notification of commencement of construct/ reconstruct Notification of startup; and Yes.

iv. contents of each ..................................................... Yes.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 19: 25 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1761 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 10 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART DDDDD   Continued Citation Subject Brief description Explanation § 63.9( c) ................................... Request for Compliance Extension ....... Can request if cannot comply by date or if installed BACT/ LAER. Yes.

§ 63.9( d) .................................. Notification of Special Compliance Requirements for New Source. For sources that commence construction between proposal and promulgation and want to comply 3 years after effective date. Yes.

§ 63.9( e) .................................. Notification of Performance Test ........... Notify Administrator 60 days prior ............................... Yes.

§ 63.9( f) ................................... Notification of VE/ Opacity Test .............. Notify Administrator 30 days prior ............................... Yes.

§ 63.9( g) .................................. Additional Notifications When Using Continuous Monitoring Systems. i. Notification of performance evaluation; and ii. Notification using continuous opacity monitoring system data; and iii. Notification that exceeded criterion for relative accuracy Yes. Yes.

Yes.

§ 63.9( h)( 1)   ( 6) ........................ Notification of Compliance Status .......... i. Contents; and ........................................................... ii. Due 60 days after end of performance test or other compliance demonstration, except for opacity/ VE, which are due 30 days after. iii. When to submit to Federal vs. State authority ....... Yes. Yes.

Yes.

§ 63.9( i) .................................... Adjustment of Submittal Deadlines ........ Procedures for Administrator to approve change in when notifications must be submitted. Yes.

§ 63.9( j) .................................... Change in Previous Information ............ Must submit within 15 days after the change ............. Yes.

§ 63.10( a) ................................ Recordkeeping/ Reporting ...................... i. Applies to all, unless compliance extension; and ii. When to submit to Federal vx. State authority; and iii. Procedures for owners of more than 1 source ....... Yes. Yes. Yes.

§ 63.10( b)( 1) ............................ Recordkeeping/ Reporting ...................... i. General Requirements; and ..................................... ii. Keep all records readily available; and iii. Keep for 5 years ..................................................... Yes. Yes. Yes.

§ 63.10( b)( 2)( i)   ( v) ................... Records related to Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction. i. Occurrence of each of operation ( process equipment and Yes.

ii. Occurrence of each malfunction of air pollution equipment; and Yes.

iii. Maintenance on air pollution control equipment; and Yes.

iv. Actions during startup, shutdown, and malfunction. Yes.

§ 63.10( b)( 2)( vi) and ( x   xi) ...... Continuous monitoring systems Records. i. Malfunctions, inoperative, out of control; and monitoring inoperative, out of systems control; and Yes.

ii. Calibration checks; and ........................................... Yes. iii. Adjustments, maintenance ...................................... Yes.

§ 63.10( b)( 2)( vii)   ( ix) ............... Records .................................................. i. Measurements to demonstrate compliance with emission limitations; and Yes.

ii. Performance test, performance evaluation, and visible emission observation results; and Yes.

iii. Measurements to determine conditions of performance tests and performance evaluations. Yes.

§ 63.10( b)( 2)( xii) ...................... Records .................................................. Records when under waiver ........................................ Yes.

§ 63.10( b)( 2)( xiii) ..................... Records .................................................. Records when using alternative to relative accuracy test. Yes.

§ 63.10( b)( 2)( xiv) ..................... Records .................................................. All documentation supporting Initial Notification and Notification of Compliance Status. Yes.

§ 63.10( b)( 3) ............................ Records .................................................. Applicability Determinations Yes.

§ 63.10( c)( 1)   ( 6), ( 9)   ( 15) ....... Records .................................................. Additional Records for continuous monitoring systems Yes.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 21: 19 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00103 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1762 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 10 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART DDDDD   Continued Citation Subject Brief description Explanation § 63.10( c)( 7)   ( 8) ...................... Records .................................................. Records of excess emissions and parameter monitoring exceedances for continuous monitoring systems No.

§ 63.10( d)( 1) ............................ General Reporting Requirements .......... Requirement to report ................................................. Yes.

§ 63.10( d)( 2) ............................ Report of Performance Test Results ..... When to submit to Federal or State authority ............. Yes.

§ 63.10( d)( 3) ............................ Reporting Opacity or VE Observations .. What to report and when ............................................. Yes.

§ 63.10( d)( 4) ............................ Progress Reports ................................... Must submit progress reports on schedule if under compliance extension. Yes.

§ 63.10( d)( 5) ............................ Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Reports Contents and submission ............................................ Yes.

§ 63.10( e)( 1)   ( 2) ...................... Additional continuous monitoring systems Reports. i. Must report results for each CEM on a unit; and Yes.

ii. Written copy of performance evaluation; and Yes. iii. Three copies of continuous opacity monitoring system performance evaluation. Yes.

§ 63.10( e)( 3) ............................ Reports ................................................... Excess Emission Reports ............................................ No.

§ 63.10( e)( 3)( i   iii) .................... Reports ................................................... Schedule for reporting excess emissions and parameter monitor exceedance ( now defined as deviations No.

§ 63.10( e)( 3)( iv   v) ................... Excess Emissions Reports .................... i. Requirement to revert to quarterly submission if there is an excess emissions and parameter monitor exceedance ( now defined as deviations); and No.

ii. Provisions to request semiannual reporting after compliance for one year; and No.

iii. Submit report by 30th day following end of quarter or calendar half; and No.

iv. If there has not been an exceedance or excess emission ( now defined as deviations), report contents is a statement that there have been no deviations No.

§ 63.10( e)( 3)( iv   v) ................... Excess Emissions Reports .................... Must submit report containing all of the information in § 63.10( c)( 5   13), § 63.8( c)( 7   8). No.

§ 63.10( e)( 3)( vi   viii) ................. Excess Emissions Report and Summary Report. i. Requirements for reporting excess emissions for continuous monitoring systems ( now called deviations No.

ii. Requires all of the information in § 63.10( c)( 5   13), § 63.8( c)( 7   8). No.

§ 63.10( e)( 4) ............................ Reporting continuous opacity monitoring system data. Must submit continuous opacity monitoring system data with performance test data. Yes.

§ 63.10( f) ................................. Waiver for Recordkeeping/ Reporting ..... Procedures for Administrator to waive ........................ Yes.

VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 21: 33 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2 1763 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2003 / Proposed Rules TABLE 10 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63   APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART DDDDD   Continued Citation Subject Brief description Explanation § 63.11 ..................................... Flares ..................................................... Requirements for flares ............................................... No. § 63.12 ..................................... Delegation .............................................. State authority to enforce standards ........................... Yes.

§ 63.13 ..................................... Addresses .............................................. Addresses where reports, notifications, and requests are sent. Yes.

§ 63.14 ..................................... Incorporation by Reference ................... Test methods incorporated by reference .................... Yes.

§ 63.15 ..................................... Availability of Information ....................... Public and confidential information ............................. Yes.

[ FR Doc. 03   85 Filed 1   10   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   P VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 21: 33 Jan 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 13JAP2. SGM 13JAP2


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 175 (Friday, September 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62494-62495]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21679]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC16-175-000.
    Applicants: Grand View PV Solar Two LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of
Grand View PV Solar Two LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/31/16.
    Accession Number: 20160831-5364.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/21/16.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2641-026; ER10-2663-026; ER10-2881-026; ER10-
2882-027; ER10-2883-026; ER10-2884-026; ER10-2885-026; ER10-2886-027;
ER13-1101-022; ER13-1541-021; ER14-661-013; ER14-787-015; ER15-54-007;
ER15-55-007; ER15-647-004; ER15-1475-008; ER15-2191-003; ER15-2453-003;
ER15-2593-007; ER16-452-007; ER16-705-005; ER16-706-005; ER16-1154-005.
    Applicants: Oleander Power Project, L.P., Southern Company--Florida
LLC, Southern Power Company, Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power
Company, Mississippi Power Company, Gulf Power Company, Southern Turner
Cimarron I, LLC, Spectrum Nevada Solar, LLC, Campo Verde Solar, LLC,
SG2 Imperial Valley LLC, Macho Springs Solar, LLC, Lost Hills Solar,
LLC, Blackwell Solar, LLC, Kay Wind, LLC, North Star Solar, LLC, Grant
Wind, LLC, Passadumkeag Windpark, LLC, Desert Stateline LLC, RE
Tranquillity LLC, RE Garland A LLC, RE Garland LLC, Parrey, LLC.
    Description: Errata to August 1, 2016 Notification of Non-Material
of Change

in Status of Oleander Power Project, Limited Partnership, et al.
    Filed Date: 8/31/16.
    Accession Number: 20160831-5404.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4028-008.
    Applicants: Portsmouth Genco, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Portsmouth
Genco, LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/31/16.
    Accession Number: 20160831-5398.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-1255-001.
    Applicants: Antelope Big Sky Ranch LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Antelope Big Sky Ranch LLC MBR
Tariff to be effective 5/21/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/31/16.
    Accession Number: 20160831-5158.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2522-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: 3243 City of Piggott, AR
Municipal Light, Water and Sewer NITSA NOA to be effective 8/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/31/16.
    Accession Number: 20160831-5360.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2523-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: 3244 City of Malden ?
Board of Public Works NITSA NOA to be effective 8/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/31/16.
    Accession Number: 20160831-5361.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2524-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Louisiana, LLC.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: EES LBA Agreements to be
effective 9/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/31/16.
    Accession Number: 20160831-5363.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2525-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Notice of cancellation of Three Service Agreements of
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Filed Date: 8/31/16.
    Accession Number: 20160831-5375.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2526-000.
    Applicants: WSPP Inc.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: Schedule Q PacifiCorp
Normal 2016 to be effective 6/9/2016.
    Filed Date: 9/1/16.
    Accession Number: 20160901-5037.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/22/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2527-000.
    Applicants: Caprock Solar I LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: MBR Tariff and Application to
be effective 11/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 9/1/16.
    Accession Number: 20160901-5049.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/22/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2528-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: 2016-09-01_SA
6507_Termination of White Pine 1 SSR Agreement to be effective 11/26/
2016.
    Filed Date: 9/1/16.
    Accession Number: 20160901-5057.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/22/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2529-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc., New England Power Pool
Participants Committee.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to Net
Commitment Period Compensation Calculation for Dual Fuel Audits to be
effective 11/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 9/1/16.
    Accession Number: 20160901-5087.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/22/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2530-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: 2028R9 Sunflower Electric
Power Corporation NITSA NOA Notice of Cancellation to be effective 6/1/
2016.
    Filed Date: 9/1/16.
    Accession Number: 20160901-5107.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/22/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2531-000.
    Applicants: NYSEG Solutions, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Cancellation to be effective 9/
30/2016.
    Filed Date: 9/1/16.
    Accession Number: 20160901-5146.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/22/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2532-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: 2016-09-01_Filing to Amend
RPU Attachment O and Protocols to be effective 11/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 9/1/16.
    Accession Number: 20160901-5156.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/22/16.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 1, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-21679 Filed 9-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: January 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 18)]
[Notices]
[Page 4547-4548]
[DOCID:fr28ja10-41]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Commission Staff Attendance at North American Electric
Reliability Corporation Meetings From January-June 2010

January 21, 2010.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that
members of the Commission and Commission staff may attend the following
NERC related meetings:
     NERC Planning Committee Meetings and its sub-committee
meetings.
    [cir] Tuesday--Wednesday, March 16-17, 2010 (TBD).
    [cir] Tuesday--Wednesday, June 15-16, 2010 (TBD).
     NERC Operating Committee Meetings and its sub-committee
meetings.
    [cir] Tuesday--Wednesday, March 16-17, 2010 (TBD).
    [cir] Tuesday--Wednesday, June 15-16, 2010 (TBD).
     NERC Standards Committee Meetings and its sub-committee
meetings.
    [cir] Wednesday--Thursday, January 13-14, 2010 Phoenix, AZ (2).
    [cir] Thursday, February 11, 2010 Teleconference (1).
    [cir] Thursday, March 11, 2010 Teleconference (1).
    [cir] Wednesday-Thursday, April 14-15, 2010 Tampa, FL (TBD).
    [cir] Thursday, May 13, 2010 Teleconference (1).
    [cir] Thursday, June 10, 2010 Teleconference (1).
     NERC Member Representative Committee Meetings and its sub-
committee meetings.
    [cir] TBD.

     NERC Board of Trustees Meetings and its sub-committee
meetings.
    [cir] Monday, February 15, 2010 Phoenix, AZ (3).
    [cir] Tuesday--Wednesday, May 11-12, 2010 Baltimore, MD (4).
     NERC Finance and Audit Committee Meetings.
    [cir] TBD.
     Critical Infrastructure Protection Committee Quarterly
Meetings and its sub-committee meetings.
    [cir] Wednesday--Thursday, March 17-18, 2010 (TBD).
    [cir] Wednesday--Thursday, June 16-17, 2010 (TBD).
    The meetings will be held at the following locations:
    1. North American Electric Reliability Corporation,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    2. Hilton Phoenix Airport, 2435 S. 47th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034,
480-894-1600.
    3. Arizona Grand Resort, 800 South Arizona Grand Parkway, Phoenix,
AZ 85044,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    4. Hyatt Regency Baltimore on the Inner Harbor, 300 Light Street,
Baltimore, MD 21202,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Further information may be found at http://www.nerc.com.
    The above-referenced meetings are open to the public.
    For more information, contact Mary Agnes Nimis, Office of Electric
Reliability, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Nicholas Snyder, Office of Electric
Reliability, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-1676 Filed 1-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P