[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 251 (Friday, December 30, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 96364-96366]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31597]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 11 and 101

[Docket No. FDA-2011-F-0172]
RIN 0910-AG57

Food Labeling; Nutrition Labeling of Standard Menu Items in
Restaurants and Similar Retail Food Establishments; Extension of
Compliance Date

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; extension of compliance date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is extending the
compliance date for the final rule requiring disclosure of certain
nutrition information for standard menu items in certain restaurants
and retail food establishments. The final rule appeared in the Federal
Register of December 1, 2014, and on May 5, 2016, we stated in the
Federal Register that the enforcement of the final rule would begin on
May 5, 2017. We are taking this action to clarify and confirm that the
compliance date for the final rule is May 5, 2017.

DATES: Effective date: This final rule is effective December 30, 2016.
Compliance date: Covered establishments must comply with the rule
published December 1, 2014 (79 FR 71156) by May 5, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ashley Rulffes, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-820), Food and Drug Administration, 5001
Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In the Federal Register of December 1, 2014 (79 FR 71156), we
published a final rule requiring disclosure of certain nutrition
information for standard menu

items in certain restaurants and retail food establishments. The final
rule, which is now codified at Sec.  101.11 (21 CFR 101.11), implements
provisions of section 403(q)(5)(H) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 343(q)(5)(H)) and:
     Defines terms, including terms that describe criteria for
determining whether an establishment is subject to the rule;
     establishes which foods are subject to the nutrition
labeling requirements and which foods are not subject to these
requirements;
     requires that calories for standard menu items be declared
on menus and menu boards that list such foods for sale;
     requires that calories for standard menu items that are
self-service or on display be declared on signs adjacent to such foods;
     requires that written nutrition information for standard
menu items be available to consumers who ask to see it;
     requires, on menus and menu boards, a succinct statement
concerning suggested daily caloric intake (succinct statement),
designed to help the public understand the significance of the calorie
declarations;
     requires, on menus and menu boards, a statement regarding
the availability of the written nutrition information (statement of
availability);
     establishes requirements for determination of nutrient
content of standard menu items;
     establishes requirements for substantiation of nutrient
content determined for standard menu items, including requirements for
records that a covered establishment must make available to FDA within
a reasonable period of time upon request; and
     establishes terms and conditions under which restaurants
and similar retail food establishments not otherwise subject to the
rule could elect to be subject to the requirements by registering with
FDA.
    In the preamble to the final rule (79 FR 71156 at 71239 through
71241), we stated that the rule would be effective on December 1, 2015,
and also provided a compliance date of December 1, 2015, for covered
establishments. The final rule (at Sec.  101.11(a)) defines ``covered
establishment'' as a restaurant or similar retail food establishment
that is a part of a chain with 20 or more locations doing business
under the same name (regardless of the type of ownership, e.g.,
individual franchises) and offering for sale substantially the same
menu items, as well as a restaurant or similar retail food
establishment that is voluntarily registered to be covered under Sec.
101.11(d).

II. Extending the Compliance Date

    In the Federal Register of July 10, 2015 (80 FR 39675), in response
to requests from affected entities, we announced our decision to extend
the compliance date for the final rule to December 1, 2016. The final
rule requirements are intended to ensure that consumers are provided
accurate, clear, and consistent nutrition information for foods sold in
covered establishments in a direct and accessible manner to enable
consumers to make informed and healthful dietary choices. We stated in
that extension that allowing adequate time for covered establishments
to fully implement the final rule's requirements, as described in the
requests, would help accomplish the primary objective of the final rule
and is in the public interest.
    On December 18, 2015, the President signed the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2016 (Pub. L. 114-113). Section 747 of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act states that none of the funds made
available under the Consolidated Appropriations Act may be used to
implement, administer, or enforce the final rule entitled ``Food
Labeling; Nutrition Labeling of Standard Menu Items in Restaurants and
Similar Retail Food Establishments'' until 1 year after the date we
publish a Level 1 guidance with respect to nutrition labeling of
standard menu items in restaurants and similar retail food
establishments.
    In the Federal Register of May 5, 2016 (81 FR 27067), we announced
the availability of the Level 1 guidance document and stated that
enforcement of the final rule published December 1, 2014, would
commence on May 5, 2017 (81 FR 27067 at 27068). While FDA made clear
that we would not begin enforcing menu labeling requirements prior to
May 5, 2017, we did not at that time formally make a change to the
compliance date through rulemaking.
    Therefore, through this final rule, we are clarifying and
confirming that the compliance date for the final rule entitled ``Food
Labeling; Nutrition Labeling of Standard Menu Items in Restaurants and
Similar Retail Food Establishments,'' codified at Sec.  101.11, is May
5, 2017.

III. Economic Analysis of Impacts

    We have examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive
Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601-612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4). Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct us to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation
is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net
benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). We
have developed a comprehensive Economic Analysis of Impacts that
assesses the impacts of the final rule. We believe that this final rule
is not a significant regulatory action as defined by Executive Order
12866.
    The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires Agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Because this rule provides more flexibility by
further extending the compliance date for the ``Food Labeling:
Nutrition Labeling of Standard Menu Items in Restaurants and Similar
Retail Food Establishments'' final rule (79 FR 71156) (menu labeling
final rule), we certify that the final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (section 202(a)) requires
us to prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits, before issuing ``any rule that includes
any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any one
year.'' The current threshold after adjustment for inflation is $146
million, using the most current (2015) Implicit Price Deflator for the
Gross Domestic Product. This final rule would not result in an
expenditure in any year that meets or exceeds this amount.
    This rule extends the compliance date of the menu labeling final
rule by approximately 5 months: From December 1, 2016, to May 5, 2017.
The estimated costs and benefits accrued in any given year that the
menu labeling rule is in effect, relative to the first year of
compliance, does not change; however, because the compliance date is
being extended by 5 months, the discounted value of both total costs
and total benefits decreases. The principal benefit of this final rule
will be the reduction in costs associated with extending the compliance
date by 5 months. The principal cost of this final rule will be the
reduction in benefits associated with extending the compliance date by
5 months. Extending the compliance date of the menu labeling final rule
by 5 months reduces the annualized net benefits (discounted at 3
percent) approximately 3 percent, from $457 million to $442

million. While average annualized net benefits decrease by $15 million,
they are still positive. We note that this extension of the compliance
date will not have an actual effect on the cost or benefits of the menu
labeling rule, because, under section 747 of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2016, FDA was not authorized to spend funds to
``implement, administer, or enforce'' the rule until May 5, 2017, a
year after the date on which published a Level 1 guidance with respect
to nutrition labeling of standard menu items in restaurants and similar
retail food establishments. We are presenting the benefits and costs of
the menu labeling final rule, which takes effect according to the dates
in this rule.
    The full analysis of economic impacts is available in the docket
for this final rule (Ref. 1) and at http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Reports/EconomicAnalyses/default.htm.

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This final rule contains no collection of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.

V. Analysis of Environmental Impact

    We have determined under 21 CFR 25.30(k) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

VI. Reference

    The following reference is on display in the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, and is available for viewing by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday; it
is also available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov. FDA
has verified the Web site addresses, as of the date this document
publishes in the Federal Register, but Web sites are subject to change
over time.

1. FDA, ``Food Labeling; Nutrition Labeling of Standard Menu Items
in Restaurants and Similar Retail Food Establishments; Extension of
Compliance Date,'' 2015. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Reports/EconomicAnalyses/.

    Dated: December 23, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-31597 Filed 12-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 19 (Friday, January 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4589-4590]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01688]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0089; FRL-9511-01-OMS]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Chromium Emissions From Hard and
Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks
(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), NESHAP for Chromium Emissions
from Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing
Tanks (EPA ICR Number 1611.13, OMB Control Number 2060-0327), to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a proposed
extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through March 31,
2022. Public comments were previously requested, via the Federal
Register, on February 08, 2021 during a 60-day comment period. This
notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller
description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden
and cost to the public. An agency may neither conduct nor sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before February 28,
2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OAR-2021-0089, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method)
or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
    Submit written comments and recommendations to OMB for the proposed
information collection within 30 days of publication of this notice to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information
collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for
Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Muntasir Ali, Sector Policies and
Program Division (D243-05), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina, 27711; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC
West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC.
The telephone number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For
additional information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Chromium Emissions from Hard and Decorative
Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks (40 CFR part 63,
subpart N) apply to both existing and new facilities that emit chromium
compounds from hard chromium electroplating, decorative chromium
electroplating, and chromium anodizing tanks at major and area sources.
In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications,
performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/operators of the
affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the
occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the
operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the
monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and
records are essential in determining compliance with 40 CFR part 63,
subpart N.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Owners and operators of chromium
electroplating and anodizing facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart N).
    Estimated number of respondents: 1,343 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, annually, semiannually, and
quarterly.
    Total estimated burden: 242,000 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).

    Total estimated cost: $49,000,000 (per year), which includes
$20,400,000 in annualized capital/startup and/or operation &
maintenance costs.
    Changes in the estimates: There is no change in burden from the
most-recently approved ICR as currently identified in the OMB Inventory
of Approved Burdens. This situation is due to two considerations: (1)
The regulations have not changed over the past three years and are not
anticipated to change over the next three years; and (2) the growth
rate for this industry is very low or non-existent, so there is no
significant change in the overall burden. Since there are no changes in
the regulatory requirements and there is no significant industry
growth, there are also no changes in the capital/startup or operation
and maintenance (O&M) costs.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-01688 Filed 1-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: January 16, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 11)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 2797-2799]
[DOCID:fr16ja08-3]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-0129; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-099-AD;
Amendment 39-15331; AD 2008-02-01]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; EMBRAER Model EMB-135BJ Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    It has been found that some adhesive tapes used in the interior
furnishings do not comply with the applicable flammability
requirements. In case of some nearby ignition source, fire may
propagate to the aircraft.

We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective February 20, 2008.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of February 20,
2008.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
 or in person at the U.S. Department of

Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1175; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on November 1, 2007 (72
FR 61822). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    It has been found that some adhesive tapes used in the interior
furnishings do not comply with the applicable flammability
requirements. In case of some nearby ignition source, fire may
propagate to the aircraft.

The corrective actions include an inspection to determine the presence
of cotton adhesive tape, and replacement of the tape with new tape if
necessary. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI

to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In
making these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the
information provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect about 41 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about 2 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to be $6,560, or $160 per
product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
; or in person at the Docket Operations office

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2008-02-01 Empresa Brasileira De Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER):
Amendment 39-15331. Docket No. FAA-2007-0129; Directorate Identifier
2007-NM-099-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective February
20, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to EMBRAER Model EMB-135BJ airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in EMBRAER Service
Bulletin 145LEG-25-0080, dated October 10, 2006.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25:
Equipment/Furnishings.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    It has been found that some adhesive tapes used in the interior
furnishings do not comply with the applicable flammability
requirements. In case of some nearby ignition source, fire may
propagate to the aircraft.

The corrective actions include an inspection to determine the
presence of cotton adhesive tape, and replacement of the tape with
new tape if necessary.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Within 48 months or 5,000 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first, unless already done: Carry
out a general visual inspection (GVI) for presence of cotton
adhesive tape, part number (P/N) FMM 1121-5, in the interior of
center-passenger cabin furnishings, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145LEG-25-
0080, dated October 10, 2006. If any cotton tape, P/N FMM 1121-5, is
found, before further flight, replace it with new PVF adhesive tape
bearing P/N KB42/75, as specified in paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of
this AD.
    (1) Replace cotton adhesive tapes, P/N FMM 1121-5, located under
the center-passenger cabin carpet, with new PVF adhesive tapes
bearing P/N KB42/75, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the service bulletin.
    (2) Replace cotton adhesive tapes, P/N FMM 1121-5, applied to
electrical cables in the bottom of the forward galley assembly, to
electrical cables and inside the left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH)
forward and LH aft side ledges, and to electrical cables, flexible
hose of the video monitor, soundproofing blanket, and in the LH and
RH forward and RH aft pocket door covers and partitions, with new
PVF adhesive tapes bearing P/N KB42/75 with heat-shrinkable sleeve,
P/N RNF-100-1-0, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of the service bulletin.

    Note 1: For the purpose of this AD, a general visual inspection
(GVI) is: ``A visual examination of the interior or exterior area of
an installation or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure or
irregularity. This level of inspection is made from within touching
distance, unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to
enhance visual access to all exposed surfaces in the inspection
area. This level of inspection is made under normally available
lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight or
drop-light, and may require removal or opening of access panels or
doors. Stands, ladders or platforms may be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked.''

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Todd
Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,

ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (425)
227-1149. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which
the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI)
in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI,
your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2007-03-04,
effective April 10, 2007, and EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145LEG-25-
0080, dated October 10, 2006, for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145LEG-25-0080, dated
October 10, 2006, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the
AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER), P.O. Box 343--CEP
12.225, Sao Jose dos Campos--SP, Brazil.
    (3) You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html
.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 4, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-470 Filed 1-15-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: July 19, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 137)]
[Notices]
[Page 41850]
[DOCID:fr19jy10-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13565-000-VT]

Charlie Hotchkin and Claire Fay; Notice of Availability of
Environmental Assessment

July 13, 2010.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR part
380 (Order No. 486, 52 F.R. 47879), the Office of Energy Projects has
reviewed the application for a small hydro (5 megawatts or less)
exemption from licensing for the Alder Brook Mini-Hydro Project, to be
located on Alder Brook, near the town of Richford, Franklin County,
Vermont, and has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA). In the EA,
Commission staff analyzes the potential environmental effects of the
project and concludes that issuing an exemption for the project, with
appropriate environmental measures, would not constitute a major
federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human
environment.
    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available
for public inspection. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. For further information, contact Michael
Spencer at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-17559 Filed 7-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P