[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 46 (Friday, March 8, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8413-8414]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04154]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0917; Airspace Docket No. 18-ASW-14]
RIN 2120-AA66

Revocation of Class E Airspace; Beeville-Chase Field, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action removes Class E airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface at Chase Field Industrial Airport, Beeville-
Chase Field, TX. This action is due to the cancellation of the
instrument procedures at the airport making this airspace no longer
necessary.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, April 25, 2019. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under Title 1
Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11C at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Shelby, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it supports the removal of Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at Chase Field Industrial Airport, Beeville-
Chase Field, TX.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (83 FR 55306; November 5, 2018) for Docket No. FAA-2018-0917
to remove Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface at Chase Field Industrial Airport, Beeville-Chase Field, TX.
Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraphs 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.11C, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15,
2018, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15,
2018. FAA Order 7400.11C is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11C lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 removes the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Chase Field Industrial Airport, Beeville-Chase
Field, TX.
    This action due to the cancellation of the instrument procedures at
the airport making the airspace no longer necessary.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,''

paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected to cause any
potentially significant environmental impacts, and no extraordinary
circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an environmental
assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11C,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points dated August 13, 2018, and
effective September 15, 2018, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASW TX E5 Beeville-Chase Field, TX [Removed]

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on March 1, 2019.
John A. Witucki,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2019-04154 Filed 3-7-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


ATTACHMENT C 8 HR O3 NAAQS HYPOTHETICAL NONATTAINMENT AREAS ( 2000 to 2002 data)

Areas that may have continuing 1 hr ROP & attainment demonstration obligations A B C D E F AREA 1 hr DV 8 hr DV 1hr class 8 hr Class Potential Planning Preference?

Atlanta, GA 0.144 0.099 Severe 15 Moderate Baton Rouge, LA 0.135 0.086 Severe 15 Marginal Beaumont Port Arthur,

TX 0.144 0.090 Moderate ( may be bumped to severe 15) Marginal Dallas Fort Worth, TX 0.135 0.099 Serious ( may be bumped to severe 15) Moderate Portland, ME 0.126 0.090 Moderate ( may be bumped up to serious) Marginal San Joaquin Valley, CA 0.151 0.115 Severe 15 ( contemplating voluntary bump up to extreme)* Serious Washington Baltimore,

DC MD VA WV 0.143 0.106 Severe 15 Moderate Column Definition A Name of hypothetical 8 hr O3 nonattainment area B 1 hr O3 design value for 2000 2002 ( ppm O3)

C 8 hr O3 design value for 2000 2002 ( ppm O3)

D Area's current classification if nonattainment under 1 hr O3 NAAQS E Area's 8 hr classification under final rule F Potential preference of area for option on unmet attainment demo obligation * It is not clear whether a voluntary bump up would carry the 1 hr obligation for the new classification " by operation of law."


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26785-26786]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10889]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-D-0722]

Guidance for Industry: Implementation of an Acceptable
Abbreviated Donor History Questionnaire and Accompanying Materials for
Use in Screening Frequent Donors of Blood and Blood Components;
Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a document entitled ``Guidance for Industry:
Implementation of an Acceptable Abbreviated Donor History Questionnaire
and Accompanying Materials for Use in Screening Frequent Donors of
Blood and Blood Components'' dated May 2013. The guidance document
recognizes the abbreviated donor history questionnaire and accompanying
materials (aDHQ documents), version 1.3 dated December 2012, prepared
by the AABB Donor History Task Force, as an acceptable mechanism for
collecting blood donor history information from frequent donors of
blood and blood components that is consistent with FDA's requirements
and recommendations for collecting donor history information. The aDHQ
documents will provide blood establishments that collect blood and
blood components with a specific process for administering questions to
frequent donors of blood and blood components to determine their
eligibility to donate. The guidance announced in this notice finalizes
the draft guidance of the same title dated October 2011.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the guidance to
the Office of Communication, Outreach and Development (HFM-40), Center
for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852-
1448. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist the office in
processing your requests. The guidance may also be obtained by mail by
calling CBER at 1-800-835-4709 or<PHONE_NUMBER>. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance document.
    Submit electronic comments on the guidance to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tami Belouin, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (HFM-17), Food and Drug Administration, 1401
Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852-1448,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a document entitled
``Guidance for Industry: Implementation of an Acceptable Abbreviated
Donor History Questionnaire and Accompanying Materials for Use in
Screening Frequent Donors of Blood and Blood Components'' dated May
2013. The guidance document recognizes the aDHQ documents, version 1.3
dated December 2012, prepared by the AABB Donor History Task Force, as
an acceptable mechanism for collecting blood donor history information
from frequent donors of blood and blood components that is consistent
with FDA's requirements and recommendations. The aDHQ User Brochure
defines a frequent donor as a donor who has previously donated two
times using the full-length donor history questionnaire, one donation
of which occurred within the previous 6 months. The aDHQ documents will
provide blood establishments that collect blood and blood components
with a specific process for administering questions to frequent donors
of blood and blood components to determine their eligibility to donate.
The guidance also advises licensed manufacturers who choose to
implement the acceptable aDHQ documents on how to report the
manufacturing change consisting of the implementation of the aDHQ
documents under 21 CFR 601.12.
    In the Federal Register of October 24, 2011 (76 FR 65735), FDA
announced the availability of the draft guidance of the same title
dated October 2011. FDA received some comments on the draft guidance
and those comments were considered as the guidance was finalized. A
summary of changes includes: Referencing the most current version of
the acceptable aDHQ documents, clarifying that the full-length and
abbreviated questionnaires are designed to be implemented together, and
editorial changes to improve clarity. The guidance announced in this
notice finalizes the draft guidance dated October 2011.
    The guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents FDA's
current thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer any rights
for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An
alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collections of information in 21 CFR 601.12 and Form FDA 356(h) have
been approved under OMB control number 0910-0338; and the collections
of information in 21 CFR 640.63 have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0116.

III. Comments

    Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to http://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

IV. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the guidance at
either http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: May 2, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-10889 Filed 5-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


 [Federal Register Volume 82, Number 109 (Thursday, June 8, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 26603] [FR Doc No: 2017-11894]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 232

404 Program Definitions; Exempt Activities Not Requiring 404  Permits

CFR Correction

0 In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 190 to 259,  revised as of July 1, 2016, on page 319, in Sec.  232.2, the first  definition of Waters of the United States is removed.

[FR Doc. 2017-11894 Filed 6-7-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1301-00-D


0.15
                                     0.65

CC-Middletown-OH
Coke Oven Battery
                                      152
                                     1.7%
                                     1.7%
                                     0.16
                                     0.70
                                     0.70
CC-BurnsHarbor-IN
Battery #1
                                      164
                                     2.6%
                                     1.8%
                                     0.26
                                      1.1
                                      1.6
CC-BurnsHarbor-IN
Battery #2
                                      164
                                     1.1%

                                     0.11
                                     0.47

CC-Monessen-PA
Battery 1B
                                      74
                                    0.086%
                                     0.11%
                                    0.0039
                                     0.017
                                     0.031
CC-Monessen-PA
Battery 2
                                      38
                                     0.14%

                                    0.0032
                                     0.014

CC-Warren-OH
No. 4 Battery
                                      170
                                     1.2%
                                     1.2%
                                     0.12
                                     0.54
                                     0.54
BLU-Birmingham-AL
Coke Battery No. 3
                                      60
                                     1.63%
                                     1.4%
                                     0.060
                                     0.26
                                     0.87
BLU-Birmingham-AL
Coke Battery No. 4
                                      60
                                     1.62%

                                     0.060
                                     0.26

BLU-Birmingham-AL
Coke Battery No. 5
                                      120
                                     1.07%

                                     0.079
                                     0.35

EES-RiverRouge-MI
Coke Battery #5
                                      170
                                     0.12%
                                     0.12%
                                     0.012
                                     0.053
                                     0.053
USS-Clairton-PA
Battery 1
                                      128
                                     0.87%
                                     0.46%
                                     0.068
                                     0.30
                                      1.7
USS-Clairton-PA
Battery 2
                                      128
                                     0.85%

                                     0.067
                                     0.29

USS-Clairton-PA
Battery 3
                                      128
                                     0.47%

                                     0.037
                                     0.16

USS-Clairton-PA
Battery 13
                                      122
                                     0.18%

                                     0.014
                                     0.060

USS-Clairton-PA
Battery 14
                                      122
                                     0.22%

                                     0.016
                                     0.071

USS-Clairton-PA
Battery 15
                                      122
                                     0.39%

                                     0.029
                                     0.13

USS-Clairton-PA
Battery 19
                                      174
                                     0.29%

                                     0.031
                                     0.14

USS-Clairton-PA
Battery 20
                                      174
                                     0.29%

                                     0.031
                                     0.14

USS-Clairton-PA
B Battery
                                      150
                                     0.54%

                                     0.050
                                     0.22

USS-Clairton-PA
C Battery
                                      168
                                     0.50%

                                     0.052
                                     0.23

[1] From CAA 114 request .
[2] COEdoors (lb/hr) = ND x (PLDYARD/100) x (0.04 lb/hr) + ND x 0.94 x (PLDYARD/100) x (0.023 lb/hr). Leaks are assumed to occur 8,760 hours per year.


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 66 (Friday, April 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 20705]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07983]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-69275; File No. 4-660]

Fixed Income Roundtable

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Notice of roundtable discussion; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission will host a one day
roundtable to discuss the current market structure and potential ways
to improve the transparency, liquidity, efficiency, and other aspects
of fixed income markets. The roundtable will focus on the municipal
securities, corporate bonds, and asset-backed securities markets.
    The roundtable discussion will be held in the multi-purpose room of
the Securities and Exchange Commission headquarters at 100 F Street
NE., in Washington, DC on April 16, 2013 beginning at 8:45 a.m. and
ending at approximately 4:15 p.m. The public is invited to observe the
roundtable discussion. Seating will be available on a first-come,
first-served basis. The roundtable discussion also will be available
via webcast on the Commission's Web site at www.sec.gov.
    The roundtable will consist of four panels. The participants in the
first panel will discuss the current market structure for municipal
securities. The participants in the second panel will discuss the
current market structure for corporate bonds and asset-backed
securities. The participants in the third panel will discuss potential
improvements to the market structure for municipal securities. The
participants in the fourth panel will discuss potential improvements to
the market structure for corporate bonds and asset-backed securities.

DATES: The roundtable discussion will take place on April 16, 2013. The
Commission will accept comments regarding issues addressed at the
roundtable until May 7, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/other.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number 4-660 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submission should refer to File Number 4-660. This file number
should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help us
process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one
method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/other.shtml). Comments are
also available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's
Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on
official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.
All comments received will be posted without change; we do not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronesha A. Butler, Special Counsel, at
(202) 551-5629, Division of Trading and Markets, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-7010.

     Dated: April 2, 2013.
    By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-07983 Filed 4-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 109 (Thursday, June 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26680-26681]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11905]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9956-78-OEI]

Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision
Approval, State of Vermont

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's approval of the State of Vermont's
request to revise/modify certain of its EPA-authorized programs to
allow electronic reporting.

DATES: EPA's approval is effective July 10, 2017 for the State of
Vermont's National Primary Drinking Water Regulations Implementation
program, if no timely request for a public hearing is received and
accepted by the Agency, and on June 8, 2017 for the State of Vermont's
other authorized programs.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Seeh, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop
2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566-
1175<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media
Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal
Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR.
CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory
alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure
that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper
counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local
government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving,
electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to
EPA for a revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA
approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on
consideration of the electronic document receiving systems that the
state, tribe, or local government will use to implement the electronic
reporting. Additionally, Sec.  3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3,
subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and
modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option
of the state, tribe or local government in place of procedures
available under existing program-specific authorization regulations. An
application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the
state, tribe or local government has sufficient

legal authority to implement the electronic reporting components of the
programs covered by the application and will use electronic document
receiving systems that meet the applicable subpart D requirements.
    On March 24, 2017, the Vermont Department of Environmental
Conservation (VT DEC) submitted an application titled ``Agency of
Natural Resources Online System'' for revisions/modifications to its
EPA-approved programs under title 40 CFR to allow new electronic
reporting. EPA reviewed VT DEC's request to revise/modify its EPA-
authorized programs and, based on this review, EPA determined that the
application met the standards for approval of authorized program
revisions/modifications set out in 40 CFR part 3, subpart D. In
accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of EPA's decision to
approve Vermont's request to revise/modify its following EPA-authorized
programs to allow electronic reporting under 40 CFR parts 50-52, 60-63,
65, 70, 122, 125, 141, 144, 146, 240-270, 272-280, and 403-471, is
being published in the Federal Register:

    Part 52--Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans;
    Part 60--Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources;
    Part 62--Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated
Facilities and Pollutants;
    Part 63--National Emission Standards For Hazardous Air
Pollutants For Source Categories;
    Part 70--State Operating Permit Programs;
    Part 123--EPA Administered Permit Programs: The National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System;
    Part 142--National Primary Drinking Water Regulations
Implementation;
    Part 145--State Underground Injection Control Programs;
    Part 239--Requirements for State Permit Program Determination of
Adequacy;
    Part 271--Requirements for Authorization of State Hazardous:
Waste Program;
    Part 281--Approved Underground Storage Tank Programs; and
    Part 403--General Pretreatment Regulations For Existing And New
Sources Of Pollution.

    VT DEC was notified of EPA's determination to approve its
application with respect to the authorized programs listed above.
    Also, in today's notice, EPA is informing interested persons that
they may request a public hearing on EPA's action to approve the State
of Vermont's request to revise its authorized public water system
program under 40 CFR part 142, in accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(f).
Requests for a hearing must be submitted to EPA within 30 days of
publication of today's Federal Register notice. Such requests should
include the following information: (1) The name, address and telephone
number of the individual, organization or other entity requesting a
hearing;
    (2) A brief statement of the requesting person's interest in EPA's
determination, a brief explanation as to why EPA should hold a hearing,
and any other information that the requesting person wants EPA to
consider when determining whether to grant the request;
    (3) The signature of the individual making the request, or, if the
request is made on behalf of an organization or other entity, the
signature of a responsible official of the organization or other
entity.
    In the event a hearing is requested and granted, EPA will provide
notice of the hearing in the Federal Register not less than 15 days
prior to the scheduled hearing date. Frivolous or insubstantial
requests for hearing may be denied by EPA. Following such a public
hearing, EPA will review the record of the hearing and issue an order
either affirming today's determination or rescinding such
determination. If no timely request for a hearing is received and
granted, EPA's approval of the State of Vermont's request to revise its
part 142--National Primary Drinking Water Regulations Implementation
program to allow electronic reporting will become effective 30 days
after today's notice is published, pursuant to CROMERR section
3.1000(f)(4).

Matthew Leopard,
Director, Office of Information Management.
[FR Doc. 2017-11905 Filed 6-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 208 (Monday, October 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 74179]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23804]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-R08-SFUND-2023-0488; FRL-11438-01-R8]

Administrative Settlement Agreement, Commodore Mining Company,
Del Monte Mining Company, Kanawha Mines, LLC, Settling Parties, Mineral
County, Colorado, Purchaser

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed agreement; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, of an Administrative Settlement Agreement
between the United States on behalf of the EPA, the State of Colorado,
Commodore Mining Company, Del Monte Mining Company, Kanawha Mines, LLC,
and Mineral County, Colorado (collectively ``Parties''), at the Nelson
Tunnel/Commodore Waste Rock Superfund Site in Mineral County, Colorado.
The settlement provides that settling Parties will transfer certain
mining claims to purchaser, which will in turn support purchaser's
efforts to preserve the important historical structures on these mining
claims. The Parties acknowledge that this settlement is structured to
support purchaser's efforts to stabilize and preserve the historical
structures. In exchange, this settlement resolves the settling Parties'
alleged civil liability for the site. In exchange, this settlement also
resolves purchaser's potential CERCLA liability.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 29, 2023.

ADDRESSES: The proposed agreement and additional background information
relating to the agreement will be available upon request and will be
posted at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/nelson-tunnel. Comments and
requests for an electronic copy of the proposed agreement should be
addressed to Natalie Timmons, Enforcement Specialist, Superfund and
Emergency Management Division, Environmental Protection Agency--Region
8, Mail Code 8SEM-PAC, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202,
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER> or email address:
[email protected] and should reference the Nelson Tunnel/
Commodore Waste Rock Superfund Site.
    You may also send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
SFUND-2023-0488 to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Agee, Assistant Regional Counsel,
Office of Regional Counsel, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8,
Mail Code 8 ORC-LEC, 1595 Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado 80202, telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For thirty (30) days following the date of
publication of this document, the Agency will receive written comments
relating to the agreement. The Agency will consider all comments
received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the agreement if
comments received disclose facts or considerations that indicate that
the agreement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

Ben Bielenberg,
Acting Division Director, Superfund and Emergency Management Division,
Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2023-23804 Filed 10-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 20, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66501-66502]
[FR Doc No: 2020-22607]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2020-0573]
RIN 1625-AA09

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Little Manatee River, Ruskin,
Hillsborough County, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to modify the operating schedule that
governs the Seaboard Systems Railroad Bridge across the Little Manatee
River, mile 2.4, at Ruskin, Hillsborough County, FL. This proposed rule
would allow the swing bridge to be remotely operated and provide an
opening when a three hour notice is given. The proposed rule would also
change the name of the bridge to reflect current ownership.

DATES: Comments and relate material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before December 21, 2020.

ADDRESSES:  You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2020-0573 using Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email LT Clark W. Sanford with the Coast Guard Sector St
Petersburg Florida, Waterways Office; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> x8105,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Advance, Supplemental)
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis

    CSX Transportation requested the Coast Guard consider allowing the
Seaboard Systems Railroad Bridge 33 CFR 117.297, across the Little
Manatee River to be remotely operated. The name of the bridge would be
updated to reflect the current bridge owner and will be referred to as
the CSX Railroad Bridge. The Seaboard System Railroad Bridge across the
Little Manatee River, mile 2.4, at Ruskin, Hillsborough County, FL is a
swing bridge. The bridge is currently maintained in the closed position
with a three hour advance notice for an opening. It has a vertical
clearance of 5 feet at mean high water in the closed position and a
horizontal clearance of 35 feet.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to modify the operating schedule of the
Seaboard System Railroad Bridge across Little Manatee River, mile 2.4,
in Ruskin, Hillsborough County, FL. This proposed regulation would
change the name of the bridge and allow the bridge to be remotely
monitored and operated. This proposal will allow vessels to pass
through the bridge while taking into account the reasonable needs of
other modes of transportation.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that
vessels can still transit the bridge given advanced notice. Vessels
that can transit under the bridge without an opening may do so at any
time.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A
above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact
on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, (Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments), because it would not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01, Rev.1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning Policy COMDTINST 5090.1
(series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f). The
Coast Guard has determined that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule simply promulgates
the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from further review, under paragraph
L49, of Chapter 3, Table 3-1 of the U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementation Procedures.
    Neither a Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum
for the Record are required for this rule. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System
of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in this docket
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; DHS Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Revise Sec.  117.297 to read as follows:

Sec.  117.297  Little Manatee River.

    The draw for the CSX Railroad Bridge, mile 2.4 near Ruskin FL,
shall operate as follows:
    (a) The bridge is normally maintained in the closed position.
    (b) The bridge is not tendered locally, but will be monitored and
operated by a remote bridge tender. The draw must open if at least
three hours advance notice is requested via marine radio channel 9 VHF
or telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (c) Marine radio communication shall be maintained, by the remote
bridge tender, with mariners near the bridge for the safety of
navigation. Visual monitoring of the waterway shall be maintained with
the use of cameras. Detection sensors shall be installed for the
detection of vessels approaching the spans.
    (d) The bridge shall not be operated from the remote location in
the following events: Failure or obstruction of the detection sensors,
cameras or marine radio communications. In these situations, a bridge
tender must be on-site and locally operate the bridge.

    Dated: October 7, 2020.
Eric C. Jones,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2020-22607 Filed 10-19-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P