[Federal Register: May 27, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 102)]
[Notices]
[Page 30414]
[DOCID:fr27my08-80]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1753-DR]

Mississippi; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1753-DR), dated May 8,
2008, and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 8, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated May 8, 2008, the President declared a major disaster under the
authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5206 (the Stafford Act), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State
of Mississippi resulting from severe storms and flooding beginning
on March 20, 2008, and continuing, is of sufficient severity and
magnitude to warrant a major disaster declaration under the Robert
T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C.
5121-5206 (the Stafford Act). Therefore, I declare that such a major
disaster exists in the State of Mississippi.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Individual Assistance in the
designated areas, Hazard Mitigation throughout the State, and any
other forms of assistance under the Stafford Act that you deem
appropriate. Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance
be supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act
for Hazard Mitigation and Other Needs Assistance will be limited to
75 percent of the total eligible costs. If Public Assistance is
later requested and warranted, Federal funds provided under that
program also will be limited to 75 percent of the total eligible
costs, except for any particular projects that are eligible for a
higher Federal cost-sharing percentage under the FEMA Public
Assistance Pilot Program instituted pursuant to 6 U.S.C. 777.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
to the extent allowable under the Stafford Act.

    The time period prescribed for the implementation of section
310(a), Priority to Certain Applications for Public Facility and Public
Housing Assistance, 42 U.S.C. 5153, shall be for a period not to exceed
six months after the date of this declaration.
    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, Michael L. Parker, of FEMA is
appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared
disaster.
    The following areas of the State of Mississippi have been
designated as adversely affected by this declared major disaster:

    Bolivar, Warren, Washington, and Wilkinson Counties for
Individual Assistance.
    All counties within the State of Mississippi are eligible to
apply for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in
Presidential Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidential Declared
Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and
Households; 97.050, Presidential Declared Disaster Assistance to
Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-11686 Filed 5-23-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P


 tc \l2 "SF SUPPORTING STATEMENT

	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NESHAP for Stationary Combustion Turbines

1.  Identification of the Information Collection

1(a)  Title of the Information Collection

	NESHAP for Stationary Combustion Turbines (40 CFR part 63, subpart YYYY) (Renewal)

1(b)  Short Characterization/Abstract

The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the regulations published at 40 CFR Part 63, subpart YYYY, were proposed on January 14, 2003, and promulgated on March 5, 2004.  In addition, the standard was amended on August 18, 2004, to stay the effectiveness of two subcategories of turbines: lean pre-mix gas-fired turbines and diffusion flame gas-fired turbines.  These regulations apply to new sources that commenced construction or reconstruction after the date of the final rule.  This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart YYYY.

In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/operators of the affected facilities.  They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative.  These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP.

Any owner/operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records.  All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority.  In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent directly to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office.

  There is an average of one affected facilities at each plant site and that each plant site has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator of the plant site).  Over the next three years, an average of 22 respondents per year will be subject to the standard, and 9 additional respondents per year will become subject to the standard.

OMB approved the currently active ICR without any “Terms of Clearance.”

2.  Need for and Use of the Collection

2(a)  Need/Authority for the Collection

The EPA is charged under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants.  These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction.  In addition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any owner/operator subject to any requirement of this Act to:

(A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports; (C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonably require.

In the Administrator's judgment, formaldehyde emissions from the combustion of oil cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.  Therefore, the NESHAP was promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR part 63, subpart YYYY.

2(b)  Practical Utility/Users of the Data

The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard(s) ensure compliance with the applicable regulations which where promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act.  The collected information is also used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings.

Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility’s initial capability to comply with the emission standard(s). Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the standard(s) at all times.  During the performance test a record of the operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission monitor.

The notifications required in the standard(s) are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations.  The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properly installed and operated and the standard(s) are being met.  The performance test may also be observed.

The required semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess emissions, identify problems at the facility, verify operation/maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations.

3.  Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria

The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part 63, subpart YYYY.

3(a)  Nonduplication

 If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directly to the appropriate EPA regional office.  Otherwise, the information is sent directly to the delegated state or local agency.  If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a copy of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards.  Therefore, no duplication exists.

3(b)  Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this ICR was published in the Federal Register (71 FR 58853) on October 5, 2006.  No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register.

3(c)  Consultations

	Stationary combustion turbines are used in more than 30 different industry sectors.  Consultation with industry associations for each of these industry sectors, if they exist, would be very resource intensive and is unlikely to produce accurate burden estimates.  Instead, we relied on data submitted by industry used in the economic analysis as part of the rule development.  In addition, the Agency’s industry experts have been consulted, and the Agency’s internal data sources and projections of industry growth over the next three years were considered.  The primary source of information as reported by industry, in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the standard, is the AFS (AIRS Facility Subsystem) which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance.  AFS is EPA’s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of all compliance data.  The growth rate for the industry is based on our consultations with the Agency’s internal industry experts. Approximately 22 respondents will be subject to the standard over the three year period covered by this ICR.

3(d)  Effects of Less Frequent Collection

Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards.  Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met.  If the information required by these standards was collected less frequently, the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility of detecting violations would be less likely.

3(e)  General Guidelines

These reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated by OMB under 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5.

	These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least five years.  This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards.  EPA believes that the five year records retention requirement is consistent with the part 70 permit program and the five year statute of limitations on which the permit program is based.  The retention of records for five years allows EPA to establish the compliance history of a source, any pattern of non-compliance and to determine the appropriate level of enforcement action.  EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have violations extending beyond five years.  In addition, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of essential records.

3(f)  Confidentiality

Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B - Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).

3(g)  Sensitive Questions

The reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive questions.

4.  The Respondents and the Information Requested

4(a)  Respondents/SIC Codes

The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are owners and/or operators of stationary combustion turbines.  Stationary combustion turbines are used in more than 34 different industry and government sectors.  However, the majority of the sources covered by Subpart YYYY fall into five Standard Industrial code (SIC) and North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code categories listed in the table below.

Standard

SIC

NAICS

40 CFR part 63, subpart YYYY

49, 46, 13, 28, 29

221, 486, 211, 325, 324

4(b)  Information Requested

(i)  Data Items

In this ICR, all the data that is recorded or reported is required by NESHAP for Stationary Combustion Turbines (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYY).

A source must make the following reports:

Notifications

Initial Notification for Gas-Fired Turbines	63.6095(d)

Notification of Construction/Reconstruction.	63.6145

Notification of Actual Startup.	63.9(b)

Notification of Performance Test.	63.7(b)(1), 63.6145(e)

Notification of Compliance Status	63.(h)(2)(ii), 63.6145(f)

Reports

Performance Test Plan	63.7(c)

Semi-annual Compliance Report.	63.6150(a)

A source must keep the following records:

Recordkeeping

Maintain records of monitoring data.

63.6155

Maintain records for five years.

63.6160(b)

Electronic Reporting

Some of the respondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data.  Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping at a plant site.

Also, regulatory agencies in cooperation with the respondents, continue to create reporting systems to transmit data electronically.  However, electronic reporting systems are still not widely used.  At this time, it is estimated that approximately 10 percent of the respondents use electronic reporting.

(ii)  Respondent Activities

Respondent Activities

Read instructions.

Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate the catalyst inlet temperature monitor

Perform initial performance test, Reference Method 320 test, and repeat performance tests if necessary.

Write the notifications and reports listed above.

Enter information required to be recorded above.

Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information.

Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information.

Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information.

.  The Information Collected:  Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management

5(a)  Agency Activities

EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required information.

Agency Activities

Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry.

Audit facility records.

Input, analyze, and maintain data in the AIRS Facility Subsystem (AFS).

5(b)  Collection Methodology and Management

Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are properly installed and operated.  Performance test reports are used by the Agency to discern a source’s initial capability to comply with the emission standard.  Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs.  The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.

Information contained in the reports is entered into the AFS which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance.  AFS is EPA’s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government-owned facilities.  EPA uses the AFS for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement by local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters.  EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data.

 The records required by this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for five years.

5(c)  Small Entity Flexibility

	A majority of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large businesses).  However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the regulation.  Due to technical considerations involving the process operations and the types of control equipment employed, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and large entities.  The Agency considers these to be the minimum requirements needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small entities.  To the extent that larger businesses can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced.

5(d)  Collection Schedule

The specific frequency for each information collection activity within this request is shown in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost, NESHAP for Stationary Combustion Turbines (40 CFR part 63, subpart YYYY).

6.  Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection

Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this ICR.  The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act.  Where appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified.  Responses to this information collection are mandatory.

The Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.

6(a)  Estimating Respondent Burden

The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated to be 435 ( Total Labor Hours from Table 1).   The recordkeeping hours shown in Table 1 are 255.3 The reporting requirement hours shown in Table 1 are 179.4.  These hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously approved ICR, and any comments received.

6(b)  Estimating Respondent Costs

(i)  Estimating Labor Costs

This ICR uses the following labor rates:

Managerial	$105.36 ($50.17 + 110%)

Technical	$92.09   ($43.85 + 110%)

Clerical	$47.25   ($22.50 + 110%)

These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2006, Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group.  The rates are from column 1, Total compensation.  The rates have been increased by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.

(ii)  Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs

The type of industry costs associated with the information collection activities in the subject standard(s) are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring.  The capital/startup costs are one time costs when a facility becomes subject to the regulation.  The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor(s) and other costs such as photocopying and postage.

(iii)  Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

(A)

Continuous Monitoring Device

(B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent

(C)

Number of New Respondents

(D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost,  (B X C)

(E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent

(F)

Number of Respondents  with O&M

(G)

Total O&M,

(E X F)

 Catalyst Inlet Temperature

$500.00

3

$1,500.00

0

17.5

0

The total capital/startup costs for this ICR are $1,500.  This is the total of column D in the above table.  There are no annual operation and maintenance costs associated with this standard.  We expect the catalyst inlet temperature monitor to be maintenance free.

The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the ICR is estimated to be $1,500.

6(c)  Estimating Agency Burden and Cost

The only costs to the Agency are those costs associated with analysis of the reported information.  EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as the examination of records maintained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information.

The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $11,135.00.

This cost is based on the average hourly labor rate as follows:

           Managerial	$58.18  (GS-13, Step 5, $36.36 + 60%)

           Technical	$43.17  (GS-12, Step 1, $26.98 + 60%)

           Clerical		$23.36  (GS-6, Step 3, $14.60 + 60%)

These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2007 General Schedule which excludes locality rates of pay.  The rates have been increased by 60% to acco                 unt for the benefit packages available to government employees.  Details upon which this estimate is based appear in Table 2: NESHAP for Stationary Combustion Turbines (40 CFR part 63, subpart YYYY), below.

6(d)  Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

Based on our research for this ICR, on average over the next three years, approximately 13 existing respondents will be subject to the standard.  It is estimated that an additional 9 respondents per year will become subject.  The overall average number of respondents, as shown in the table below is 31 per year.

The number of respondents is calculated using the following table that addresses the three years covered by this ICR.

Number of Respondents

Respondents That Submit Reports

Respondents That Do Not Submit Any Reports

Year

(A)

Number of New Respondents 1

(B)

Number of Existing Respondents2

(C)

Number of Existing  Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports

(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents

(E)

Number of Respondents

(E=A+B+C-D)

1

9

13

0

0

22

2

9

22

0

0

31

3

9

31

0

0

40

Average

9

22

0

0

31

1 New respondents include sources with constructed, reconstructed and modified affected facilities.  We estimate that six (6) of the nine (9) sources will be gas fired turbines and the remaining three (3) will be oil fired turbines.  Gas fired turbines are only subject to a one-time initial notification requirement.

2 Although there are a number of gas fired turbines that previously submitted one-time initial notifications during the pervious ICR period, they have no additional compliance responsibilities, including recordkeeping and reporting, over the next three years.  Therefore, they are not included as respondents for the purpose of this ICR.

.

Column D is subtracted to avoid double-counting respondents.  As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three year period of this ICR is 31.The total number of annual responses per year is calculated using the following table:

Total Annual Responses

(A)

Information Collection Activity

(B)

Number of Respondents

(C)

Number of Responses

(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports

(E)

Total Annual  Responses

E=(BxC)+D

Initial Notification

6

1

0

6

Notification of Construction

3

1

0

3

Notification of Startup

3

1

0

3

Performance Test Notification

3

1

0

3

Notification of Compliance

3

1

0

3

Semi-Annual Compliance Report

17.51

2

0

35

Total

53

1 We estimate that there are 13 existing sources currently subject to Subpart YYYY.  We also estimate that three (3) new sources will come on-line each year that will be required to submit semi-annual compliance reports.  Therefore, the average number of respondents submitting semi-annual compliance reports over the next three years is estimated to be 17.5 (13 existing + 4.5 new sources).  The average of 4.5 new sources over the next three years was estimated by dividing the total number of new sources over the next three years (9) by two (2).

	The number of Total Annual Responses is 53.  The total annual labor costs are $38,508.  Details regarding these estimates may be found in Table 1.  Annual Respondent Burden and Cost, NESHAP for Stationary Combustion Turbines (40 CFR part 63, subpart YYYY).

The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entities are $1,500.  The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.

The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 265 labor hours at a cost of  $11,135.  See Table 2.  Annual Agency Burden and Cost,

NESHAP for Stationary Combustion Turbines (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYY.)

6(e)  Bottom Line Burden Hours Burden Hours and Cost Tables

The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively, and summarized below.

(i) Respondent Tally

The total annual labor hours are 435.  Details regarding these estimates may be found in Table 1.  Annual Respondent Burden and Cost, NESHAP for Stationary Combustion Turbines (40 CFR part 63, subpart YYYY.)  Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 8 (rounded) hours per response.

The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity are $1,500.  The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.

(ii) The Agency Tally

The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 265 labor hours at a cost of  $11,135.  See Table 2.  Annual Agency Burden and Cost NESHAP for Stationary Combustion Turbines (40 CFR part 63, subpart YYYY.)

6(f)  Reasons for Change in Burden

The decrease in burden from the most recently approved ICR is due to a change in the regulation.  On August 18, 2004 (69 FR 51184), the EPA stayed the effectiveness of this standard for gas fired turbines.  As a result, only new oil fired turbines located at major HAP sources are subject to Subpart YYYY at this time.  We do not expect new standards for the gas fired units under this standard to be promulgated within the next three years.  However, new gas fired units are required to submit a one-time initial notification.

	The change in the Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs as  calculated in section 6(b)(iii) also decreased as a result of the regulatory change on August 18, 2004.

6(g)  Burden Statement

The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 8 hours (rounded) per response.  Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency.  This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number.  The OMB Control Numbers for EPA’s regulations are listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

	To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0776.  An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov which may be used to obtain a copy of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically.  When in the system, select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified in this document.  The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC.  The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.  The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the Enforcement and Compliance Information Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>.  Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA.  Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0776 and OMB Control Number 2060-0540 in any correspondence.

Part B of the Supporting Statement

This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information

Table

    1.

Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of the Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements:

NESHAP for Stationary Combustion Turbines (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYY)

REPORTING/RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT	Hours/  Occur-ence     (A) Occur-ences/Yr              (B)	Hours/Year (C=A*B)            (C) Respondents/Yr                  (D)	Technical Hours/Yr                 (E)	Mgt. Hours/Yr (0.05*E)                 (F)	Clerical Hours/Hr (0.10*E)                  (G)	Total Hours/Yr        (E=C*D)        (H)	          Costs/Year                                                 (I)

1.	APPLICATIONS	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

2.	SURVEY AND STUDIES	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

3.	REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

a.	Read Instructions	4	1	4	9	36	1.80	3.60	41.4	$3,667.43

	b.	Required Activities

Performance Tests	12	1	12	3	36	2	4	41.4	$3,667.43

	c.	Create Information

------------------------Included in 3b----------------------------

	d.	Gather Existing Information

------------------------Included in 3b----------------------------

	e.	Write Report

	Notification for Gas-Fired Turbines	2	1	2	6	12	0.60	1	13.8	$1,222.48

	Notification of Construction/Reconstruction	2	1	2	3	6	0.30	1	6.9 $611.24

	Notification of Initial Performance Test	2	1	2	3	6	0.30	1	6.9	$611.24

	Notification of Actual Startup	2	1	2	3	6	0.30	1	6.9	$611.24

	Notification of Compliance Status	2	1	2	3	6	0.30	1	6.9	$611.24

	Semi-Annual Compliance Report	8	2	16	3	48	2	5	55.2	$4,889.90

4.	RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS

a.	Read Instructions

------------------------Included in 3a----------------------------

b.	Plan Activities

------------------------Included in 3b----------------------------

c.	Implement Activities

------------------------Included in 3b----------------------------

e.	Time to Enter Information*

Purchase and Install Catalyst Inlet Temperature Monitor	30	1	30	3	90 4.50	9.00	103.5	$9,168.57

	Records of Operating Parameters	0.5	12	6	22	132	6.60	13.20	151.8 $13,447.24

	f.	Train Personnel	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

	g.	Audits	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

	TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN

435	$38,508

	(rounded)	(rounded)

	Assumptions

Number of plants	22

	Time required to read instructions (hours)	4

	Time required to complete performance test (hours)	12

	Time required to record operating parameters (hours)	0.5

	Time Required to Prepare Semi-Annual Compliance Report (hours)	8

	Time Required for notification preparation (hours)	2

	Technical Labor Rate	$92.09

	Management Labor Rate	$105.36

	Clerical Labor Rate	$45.15

Ta-ble

2

Annual Agency Burden and Cost, NESHAP for Stationary Combustion Turbines (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYY)

	REPORTING/RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT	EPA Hours/ Occurence     (A) Occurences/Plant/Yr       (B)	EPA Hours/   Yr     (C=A*B)    (C) Plants/Yr       (D)	Technical Hours/Yr                 (E)	Mgt. Hours/Yr (0.05*E)                 (F)	Clerical Hours/Hr (0.10*E)                  (G)	Total       Hours/ Yr (E=C*D)        (H)	Cost/ Yr        (I)

REPORT REVIEW

	New or Reconstructed

Review Initial Notification for Gas-Fired Turbines	2	1	2	6	12	0.6	1.2 13.8	$580.98

Review Notification of Construction/Reconstruction	2	1	2	3	6	0.3	0.6	6.9 $290.49

Review Notification of Actual Startup	2	1	2	3	6	0.3	0.6	6.9	$290.49

Notification of Initial Performance Test	2	1	2	3	6	0.3	0.6	6.9	$290.49

Review Review Performance Test Results	8	1	8	3	24	1.2	2.4	27.6	$1,161.96

Review Semi-Annual Compliance Reports	8	1	8	22	176	8.8	17.6	202.4 $8,521.04

	TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN

265	$11,135

(Rounded)	(Rounded)

	Assumptions

	Average Number of Exisitng Sources	22

Number of new or reconstructed turbines  per year	9

Number of New Gas Fired Turbines	6

Number of New Oil Fired Turbines	3

Time Required to Review Notifications (hours)	2

Time Required to Review Performance Test Reports (hours)	8

Time Required to Semi-Annual Compliance Reports (hours)	8

Technical Labor Rate	$43.17

Management Labor Rate	$58.18

Clerical Labor Rate	$23.36

 PAGE

 PAGE   17


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Dear Sir: I am an individual consumer requesting an extension to the comment period of the FDA's Proposed Rule Deeming Tobacco Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug , and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking and Prevention and Tobacco Control Act published at 79 Fed. Reg.23,142.  I am requesting that the comment period be extended an additional 105 days to a total 180 days.

The proposed rule raises issues and questions that are important to me and I would like to, in time, respond and comment on them.  The FD has had years to propose these rules, Myself and other consumers deserve a chance to make a response.

I feel very strongly about e-cigarettes as an alternative to combustible cigarettes. I believe they have saved my life. I have in fact not smoked a traditional cigarette in 6 months thanks to e-cigs.

Thanks for consideration of my request.


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 107 (Monday, June 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33010-33013]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13405]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-67066; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2012-46]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Regarding the
Extension of Unlisted Trading Privileges to New Derivative Securities
Products That Are Listed on Another Exchange and To Make Other
Conforming and Technical Amendments

May 29, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on May 16, 2012, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``NYSE
Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has
designated the proposed rule change as constituting a rule change under
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\
which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.1(a) to
set forth rules regarding the extension of unlisted trading privileges
(``UTP'') to a new derivative securities product that is listed on
another exchange and to make other conforming and technical amendments.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.1(a) to
set forth rules regarding the extension of UTP to a new derivative
securities product \5\ that is listed on another exchange and to make
other technical and conforming amendments. The purpose of the proposed
rule change is to amend the Exchange's rules to consolidate into a
single rule certain requirements for trading products on the Exchange
pursuant to UTP that have been established in various new product
proposals previously approved by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ A ``new derivative securities product'' means any type of
option, warrant, hybrid securities product or any other security,
other than a single equity option or a security futures product,
whose value is based, in whole or in part, upon the performance of,
or interest in, an underlying instrument. See 17 CFR 240.19b-4(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under current NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.1, only listed or UTP
securities may be dealt in on the Corporation. Securities may be listed
or admitted to UTP on a ``when issued'' or ``when distributed'' basis.
The Exchange proposes to clarify the Rule by putting the current text
of the Rule in a new subparagraph (a)(1) and adding text to note that a
security must be eligible for UTP under Section 12(f) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''). The Exchange also proposes to add
text that would provide that unlisted trading privileges may be
extended to any security that is an NMS Stock (as defined in Rule 600
of Regulation NMS under the Act) that is listed on another national
securities exchange and any such security would be subject to all the
Exchange trading rules applicable to NMS Stocks, unless otherwise
noted.
    The Exchange proposes to add a new Rule 5.1(a)(2) to govern new
derivative securities products. Any new derivative securities product
would be subject to all Exchange trading rules applicable to equity
securities, unless otherwise noted. Under proposed NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 5.1(a)(2)(i), the Exchange would file a Form 19b-4(e) with the
Commission for any security that is a

new derivative securities product as defined in Rule 19b-4(e) under the
Act.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.1(a)(2)(ii), the Exchange
would distribute an information circular prior to the commencement of
trading in such a new derivative securities product that generally
would include the same information as the information circular provided
by the listing exchange, including (1) the special risks of trading the
new derivative securities product, (2) the Exchange's rules that will
apply to the new derivative securities product, including the
suitability rule,\7\ (3) information about the dissemination of value
of the underlying assets or indices, and (4) the risk of trading during
irregular trading hours due to the lack of calculation or dissemination
of the intraday indicative value or a similar value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 9.2(a)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.1(a)(2)(iii) would remind ETP
Holders \8\ that they are subject to the prospectus delivery
requirements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
``Securities Act''), unless the new derivative securities product is
the subject of an order by the Commission exempting the product from
certain prospectus delivery requirements under Section 24(d) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ``1940 Act''), and the
product is not otherwise subject to prospectus delivery requirements
under the Securities Act. The Exchange would inform its ETP Holders
regarding the application of the provisions of this new subparagraph to
a particular series of exchange-traded funds governed by the 1940 Act
by means of an information circular.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The term ``ETP Holder'' refers to a sole proprietorship,
partnership, corporation, limited liability company or other
organization in good standing that has been issued an Equity Trading
Permit. An ETP Holder must be a registered broker or dealer pursuant
to Section 15 of the Act. See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.1(a)(2)(iv) would address
trading halts in the new derivative securities products traded on the
Exchange pursuant to UTP. Under the proposed rule change, if a
temporary interruption occurs in the calculation or wide dissemination
of the intraday indicative value (or similar value) or the value of the
underlying index or instrument and the listing market halts trading in
the product, the Exchange, upon notification by the listing market of
such halt due to such temporary interruption, also would immediately
halt trading in that product on the Exchange. If the intraday
indicative value (or similar value) or the value of the underlying
index or instrument continues not to be calculated or widely available
as of the commencement of trading on the Exchange on the next business
day, the Exchange would not commence trading of the product that day.
If an interruption in the calculation or wide dissemination of the
intraday indicative value (or similar value) or the value of the
underlying index or instrument continues, the Exchange could resume
trading in the product only if calculation and wide dissemination of
the intraday indicative value (or similar value) or the value of the
underlying index or instrument resumes or trading in such series
resumes in the listing market. The Exchange also would halt trading in
a new derivative securities product listed on the Exchange for which a
net asset value (and in the case of managed fund shares or actively
managed exchange-traded funds, a ``disclosed portfolio'') is
disseminated if the Exchange became aware that the net asset value or,
if applicable, the disclosed portfolio was not being disseminated to
all market participants at the same time. The Exchange would maintain
the trading halt until such time as the Exchange became aware that the
net asset value and, if applicable, the disclosed portfolio was
available to all market participants. Nothing in the proposed rule
would limit the power of the Exchange under the Rules (including
without limitation Rules 7.12, 7.13, 7.18, and 7.34) or procedures of
the Exchange with respect to the Exchange's ability to suspend trading
in any securities if such suspension is necessary for the protection of
investors or in the public interest.
    Proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.1(a)(v) would provide for
restrictions for any ETP Holder registered as a Market Maker in a new
derivative securities product that derives its value from one or more
currencies, commodities, or derivatives based on one or more currencies
or commodities, or is based on a basket or index composed of currencies
or commodities (collectively, ``Reference Assets''). Specifically, the
ETP Holder acting as a registered Market Maker in a new derivative
securities product must file with the Exchange, in a manner prescribed
by the Exchange, and keep current a list identifying all accounts for
trading the underlying physical asset or commodity, related futures or
options on futures, or any other related derivatives, which the ETP
Holder acting as registered Market Maker may have or over which it may
exercise investment discretion. No ETP Holder acting as registered
Market Maker in the new derivative securities product shall trade in
the underlying physical asset or commodity, related futures or options
on futures, or any other related derivatives, in an account in which an
ETP Holder acting as a registered Market Maker, directly or indirectly,
controls trading activities, or has a direct interest in the profits or
losses thereof, which has not been reported to the Exchange as required
by this Rule. A Market Maker would be required, in a manner prescribed
by the Exchange, to file with the Exchange and keep current a list
identifying any accounts (``Related Instrument Trading Accounts'') for
which Related Instruments are traded (1) in which the Market Maker
holds an interest, (2) over which it has investment discretion, or (3)
in which it shares in the profits and/or losses. In addition, a Market
Maker would not be permitted to have an interest in, exercise
investment discretion over, or share in the profits and/or losses of a
Related Instrument Trading Account that has not been reported to the
Exchange as required by the proposed rule. In addition to the existing
obligations under Exchange rules regarding the production of books and
records, a Market Maker would be required, upon request by the
Exchange, to make available to the Exchange any books, records, or
other information pertaining to any Related Instrument Trading Account
or to the account of any registered or non-registered employee
affiliated with the Market Maker for which Related Instruments are
traded. Finally, a Market Maker could not use any material nonpublic
information in connection with trading a Related Instrument.
    The Exchange represents that its surveillance procedures for new
derivative securities products traded on NYSE Arca Equities pursuant to
UTP would be similar to the procedures used for equity securities
traded on the Exchange and would incorporate and rely upon existing
Exchange surveillance systems. The Exchange would closely monitor
activity in new derivative securities products traded on the Exchange
pursuant to UTP and deter any potential improper trading activity. The
proposed rule change also provides that the Exchange would enter into a
comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement (``CSSA'') with a market
that trades components of the index or portfolio on which the new
derivative securities product is based to the same extent that the
listing exchange's rules require the listing market to enter into a
CSSA with such market.

    Lastly, the Exchange proposes to remove references in NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) Commentaries .01, .02, and .03; Rule 8.100
Commentaries .01, .02, and .03; and Rule 8.202 Commentary .04 that
refer to the current UTP policy. The Exchange proposes to delete these
references as they will be rendered obsolete by the proposed rule
change or are unnecessary. The proposed deletions address the
dissemination of information, surveillance procedures, and disclosures
that are addressed by the proposed rule change, or cross-reference the
Exchange's trading hours in a manner that is unnecessary. The Exchange
also proposes to amend the definitions of ``UTP Listing Market'' in
NYSE Arca Equities Rules 1(jj) and to amend the provisions for UTP
regulatory halts in NYSE Arca Equities 7.18 to reflect that securities
traded UTP may be listed on any exchange.
2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act
\9\ in general and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \10\ in
particular in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system. The proposed rule change also is
consistent with Section 11A(a)(1) of the Act,\11\ in that it seeks to
ensure the economically efficient execution of securities transactions
and fair competition among brokers and dealers and among exchange
markets, and Section 12(f) of the Act,\12\ which governs the trading of
securities pursuant to UTP consistent with the maintenance of fair and
orderly markets, the protection of investors and the public interest,
and the impact of extending the existing markets for such securities.
The Exchange believes that the proposed amendment is consistent with
the goal of removing impediments to a free and open market because it
will harmonize NYSE Arca's UTP policy with rules of other exchanges,
further promote fair competition in trading among exchanges, and be
consistent with the requirements for UTP under the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Other

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative
delay. The Commission believes that such waiver is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest because such waiver
should benefit investors by creating, without undue delay, additional
competition in the trading of new derivative securities products,
subject to consistent and reasonable standards. Proposed NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 5.1(a) is closely modeled after similar rules of other
national securities exchanges \15\ and does not raise any novel or
significant regulatory issues. Therefore, the Commission designates the
proposed rule change as operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See BATS Exchange Rule 14.1 and Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 58623 (September 23, 2008), 73 FR 57169 (October 1,
2008) (SR-BATS-2008-004); National Stock Exchange Rule 15.9 and
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57448 (March 6, 2008), 73 FR
13597 (March 13, 2008) (SR-NSX-2008-05); NASDAQ OMX PHLX Rule 803(o)
and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57806 (May 9, 2008), 73 FR
28541 (May 16, 2008) (SR-Phlx-2008-34); NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5740
and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59663 (March 31, 2009), 74
FR 15552 (April 6, 2009) (SR-NASDAQ-2009-018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Exchange Act. Comments may be submitted
by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2012-46 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2012-46. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from

submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSEArca-2012-46 and should be submitted on or before June 25, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-13405 Filed 6-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P