[Federal Register: October 4, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 192)]
[Notices]
[Page 56733-56735]
[DOCID:fr04oc07-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings  1

September 26, 2007.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG07-87-000.
    Applicants: Tatanka Wind Power, LLC.
    Description: Exempt Wholesale Generator Notice of Self
Certification of Tatanka Wind Power, LLC.
    Filed Date: 09/25/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070925-5046.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 16, 2007.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER98-1150-010.
    Applicants: Tucson Electric Power Company.
    Description: Tucson Electric Company and UNS Electric, Inc submits
an amended tariff sheet impacted by the supplement which is a new
tariff sheet--Original Sheet 3 under ER98-1150.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070924-0281.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 3, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER98-6-010; ER99-2387-003; ER96-2585-005; ER02-
1470-003; ER02-1573-003; ER05-1249-003.
    Applicants: New England Power Service Company; KeySpan Ravenswood,
Inc.; Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation; KeySpan-Glenwood Energy Center,
LLC; KeySpan-Port Jefferson Energy Center, LLC; Granite State Electric
Company; National Grid plc and Keyspan Corporation.
    Description: National Grid USA submits a Notice of Change in Status
for Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
    Filed Date: 09/21/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070925-0198.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 12, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER99-3077-005.
    Applicants: Colorado Power Partners.
    Description: Colorado Power Partners submits Substitute Original
Sheet 2 to its 8/9/07 filing of a notice of change in status with a
revised tariff designated as FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised Volume
1.
    Filed Date: 09/21/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070925-0187.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 12, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER99-3197-005.
    Applicants: BIV Generation Company, LLC.
    Description: BIV Generation Co, LLC submits Substitute Original
Sheet 2 to its 8/9/07 filing of a notice of change in status with a
revised tariff designated as FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised Volume
1.
    Filed Date: 09/21/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070925-0186.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 12, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER01-751-009.
    Applicants: Mountain View Power Partners, LLC.
    Description: Mountain View Power Partners, LLC submits Substitute
Original Sheet 1 et al to its 8/9/07 filing of a notice of change in
status with a revised tariff designated as FERC Electric Tariff, First
Revised Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 09/21/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070925-0189.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 12, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER03-563-063; EL04-102-018.
    Applicants: Devon Power, LLC.
    Description: Devon Power, LLC, et al. submit an Eleventh Compliance
Report of ISO New England, Inc.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070924-5041.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 15, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER04-157-023; ER04-714-013; EL05-89-003.
    Applicants: Central Vermont Public Service Corporation.
    Description: Central Vermont Public Service Corporation submits its
refund report in compliance with Commission's Opinion 489 Order as
revised on 7/26/07.
    Filed Date: 09/20/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070924-0317.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 11, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-282-002.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits Exhibit I to correct
the 6/27/07 filing of the Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service with
Kansas Municipal Energy Agency.
    Filed Date: 09/12/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070914-0121.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 03, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1094-001.
    Applicants: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.
    Description: Niagara Mohawk Power Corp dba National Grid submits
information in response to FERC's 8/21/07 letter.
    Filed Date: 09/20/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070924-0307.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 11, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1096-001.
    Applicants: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.
    Description: Niagara Mohawk Power Corp dba National Grid submits
information in response to FERC's 8/21/07 letter.
    Filed Date: 09/20/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070924-0306.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 11, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1103-001.
    Applicants: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.
    Description: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation dba National Grid
submits additional information to FERC's letter dated 8/21/07.

    Filed Date: 09/20/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070924-0330.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 11, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1125-001.
    Applicants: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.
    Description: Niagara Mohawk Power Corp dba National Grid submits
information in response to FERC's 8/21/07 letter.
    Filed Date: 09/20/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070924-0308.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 11, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1187-001.
    Applicants: Louisville Gas & Electric Company.
    Description: Louisville Gas & Electric Company, et al. submits
Exhibit A--First Amended & Restated Service Agreement under the Tariff
for Cost-Based Sales of Capacity & Energy between LG&E/KU & Illinois
Municipal Electric Agency.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070926-0103.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 15, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1238-001.
    Applicants: E. ON U.S., LLC.
    Description: E. ON US, LLC, et al. requests leave to amend its 8/3/
07 filing by withdrawing the Letter Agreement designated as Original
Sheet 570a to the LG&E/KU OATT.
    Filed Date: 09/21/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070924-0309.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 12, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1249-001.
    Applicants: Lockport Energy Associates, LP.
    Description: Lockport Energy Associates, LP submits FERC Electric
Tariff, First Revised Volume 1 and revisions to its proposed market-
based rate tariff filed on 8/6/07 pursuant to the requirements of Order
697.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070925-0184.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 15, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1258-001.
    Applicants: Rocky Mountain Power, LLC.
    Description: Rocky Mountain Power, LLC submits Substitute Original
Sheet 2 to its 8/9/07 filing of a notice of succession with a revised
tariff designated as FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 09/21/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070925-0188.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 12, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1259-001.
    Applicants: San Joaquin Cogen, LLC.
    Description: San Joaquin Cogen, LLC submits Substitute Original
Sheet 1 et al to its 8/9/07 filing of a notice of succession with a
revised tariff designated as FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 09/21/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070925-0190.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 12, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1269-001.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits updated tariff sheets and
supporting calculation charts that reflect the use of the correct
figure.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070926-0101.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 15, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1372-001.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc
submits proposed amendments to the 9/14/07 filing in order to correct
minor typographical errors and inadvertently omitted language in
certain definitions & EMT sections.
    Filed Date: 09/19/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070925-0180.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 10, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1388-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits proposed amendments to clarifiy & correct the recently
submitted 6/18/07 compliance revisions to the Emergency Markets Tarrif
re the ARR, etc.
    Filed Date: 09/12/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070913-0083.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 03, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1391-000.
    Applicants: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.
    Description: Niagara Mohawk Power Corp dba National Grid submits a
Notice of Termination of the First Amended and Restated Termination
Agreement with City of Jamestown Board of Public Utilities.
    Filed Date: 09/21/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070924-0310.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 12, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1392-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits an executed service agreements for
Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service with Powerex Corp, etc.
    Filed Date: 09/21/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070925-0183.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 12, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1393-000.
    Applicants: American Electric Power Service Corp.
    Description: American Electric Power Service Corporation submits
its proposed revisions to the Station Agreement dated 1/1/68 as amended
among Ohio Power Company, et al.
    Filed Date: 09/21/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070925-0185.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 12, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1394-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits an executed
interconnection service agreement with Ameresco Stafford, LLC and
Virginia Electric and Power Company.
    Filed Date: 09/21/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070925-0182.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 12, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1395-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: PJM Interconnection LLC submits a revised
interconnection service agreement among PJM, PSEG Nuclear LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 09/21/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070925-0181.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 12, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1396-000.
    Applicants: American Electric Power Service Corp.
    Description: American Electric Power Service Corporation agent for
Ohio Power Company et al submits and requests acceptance of Exhibit A-
10 (Repair Agreement) Facilities Construction, Operation, Maintenance &
Repair Agreement.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070926-0104.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 15, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1397-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Co. submits Service
Agreement for Wholesale Distribution Service & the Ehrenberg Wholesale
Distribution Load Interconnection Facilities Agreement with Arizona
Public Service Co.
    Filed Date: 09/25/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070926-0105.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 16, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1398-000.

    Applicants: Southwest Reserve Sharing Group.
    Description: Tucson Electric Power Company on behalf of members of
Southwest Reserve Group submits an amendment to the SRG Participation
Agreement reflecting the termination of the membership of PPL Enregy
Plus, LLC.
    Filed Date: 09/25/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070926-0102.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 16, 2007.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES07-26-003.
    Applicants: Entergy Gulf States, Inc.
    Description: Entergy Services, Inc and Entergy Gulf States, Inc et
al submit additional information with respect to their request for
authorization re proposed jurisdictional separation plan.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070926-0106.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 4, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ES07-64-000.
    Applicants: Commonwealth Edison Company.
    Description: Application of Commonwealth Edison Company Under
Section 204 of the Federal Power Act for Authorization of the Issuance
of Securities.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070924-5045.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 15, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ES07-65-000.
    Applicants: PECO Energy Company.
    Description: Application of PECO Energy Company Under Section 204
of the Federal Power Act for Authorization of the Issuance of
Securities.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070924-5049.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 15, 2007.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following open access
transmission tariff filings:

    Docket Numbers: OA07-32-001; OA07-17-001.
    Applicants: Entergy Services Inc.
    Description: Entergy Operating Companies submits corrected Second
Substitute First Revised Sheet 142 to its Open Access Transmission
Tariff, adopting the terms and conditions of Order 890 pro forma
Schedule 4 etc under ER07-17, et al.
    Filed Date: 09/13/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070917-0130.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 4, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: OA07-60-001.
    Applicants: Idaho Power Company.
    Description: Substitute Tariff Sheets to Order No. 890 OATT of
Idaho Power Company under OA07-60.
    Filed Date: 09/18/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070917-5093.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 9, 2007.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following PURPA
210(m)(3) filings:

    Docket Numbers: QM07-5-000.
    Applicants: Xcel Energy Services Inc. and American E.
    Description: Southwestern Public Service Co, et al. submits an
application to terminate the requirement to enter into new contracts or
obligations with qualifying facilities under QM07-5.
    Filed Date: 09/25/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070926-0118.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 23, 2007.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Acting Deputy Director.
 [FR Doc. E7-19586 Filed 10-3-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 209 (Friday, October 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 66924]
[FR Doc No: 2011-27954]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Commissioner and Staff Attendance at North American
Electric Reliability Corporation Meetings

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that
members of the Commission and/or Commission staff may attend the
following meetings:
    North American Electric Reliability Corporation, Member
Representatives Committee and Board of Trustees Meetings.
    Westin Buckhead Atlanta, 3391 Peachtree Road, NE., Atlanta, GA
30326.
    November 2 (1 p.m.-5 p.m.) and 3 (8 a.m.-1 p.m.), 2011.
    Further information regarding these meetings may be found at:
http://www.nerc.com/calendar.php.
    The discussions at the meetings, which are open to the public, may
address matters at issue in the following Commission proceedings:

Docket No. RC08-5, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RC11-1, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RC11-2, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RC11-5, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RC11-6, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RR08-4, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RR10-11, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RR11-1, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RR11-2, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RR11-3, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RR11-4, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RR11-5, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RR11-7, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RD09-11, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RD10-2, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RD11-3, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RD11-5, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RD11-8, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RD11-9, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RD11-10, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. RD11-11, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. NP10-160, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Docket No. NP11-238, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
    For further information, please contact Jonathan First, (202) 502-
8529, or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: October 24, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-27954 Filed 10-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 160 (Monday, August 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56820-56821]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17384]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-11042-01-OA]

Public Meeting of the Science Advisory Board

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Science Advisory
Board (SAB) Staff Office is announcing a public meeting of the
chartered Science Advisory Board. The purpose of the meeting is to:
receive briefings from EPA; discuss a proposed SAB project to provide
advice to EPA on environmental justice analysis; conduct quality
reviews of three draft SAB reports titled: SAB Review of EPA's
Standardized Framework for Sewage Sludge Chemical Risk Assessment,
Review of the Updated Methodology of EPA's Environmental Justice Screen
(EJScreen) Mapping and Screening Tool (version 2.1), and Review of
EPA's draft IRIS Toxicological Review of Hexavalent Chromium; discuss a
draft SAB commentary on Volume Requirements for 2023 and Beyond under
the Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RIN 2060-AV14), and discuss
recommendations received from the SAB Work Group for Review of Science
Supporting EPA Decisions concerning SAB review of EPA planned
regulatory actions.

DATES:
    Public meeting: The chartered Science Advisory Board will meet on
the following dates. All times listed are in Eastern Time.
    1. Thursday, September 21, 2023, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    2. Friday, September 22, 2023, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Comments: See the section titled ``Procedures for providing public
input'' under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for instructions and deadlines.

ADDRESSES: The September 21-22, 2023 meeting will be conducted in
person at the Washington Plaza Hotel, located at 10 Thomas Circle NW,
Washington, DC 20005, and virtually. Please refer to the SAB website at
https://sab.epa.gov for information on how to attend the meeting
virtually.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any member of the public who wants
further information concerning this notice may contact Dr. Thomas
Armitage, Designated Federal Officer (DFO), via telephone (202) 564-
2155, or email at [email protected]. General information about
the SAB, as well as any updates concerning the meeting announced in
this notice, can be found on the SAB website at https://sab.epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background: The SAB was established pursuant to the Environmental
Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization Act (ERDDAA),
codified at 42 U.S.C. 4365, to provide independent scientific and
technical advice to the EPA Administrator on the scientific and
technical basis for agency positions and regulations. The SAB is a
Federal Advisory Committee chartered under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S. Code 10. The SAB will comply with the
provisions of FACA and all appropriate SAB Staff Office procedural
policies. Pursuant to FACA and EPA policy, notice is hereby given that
the chartered Science Advisory Board will hold a public meeting to
receive briefings from EPA and deliberate on the following topics. (1)
The SAB will discuss whether to undertake a proposed self-initiated
project to provide advice to EPA on environmental justice analysis. (2)
The SAB will conduct quality reviews of three draft reports developed
by SAB panels. The draft reports are titled: Review of EPA's
Standardized Framework for Sewage Sludge Chemical Risk Assessment,
Review of the Updated Methodology of EPA's Environmental Justice Screen
(EJScreen) Mapping and Screening Tool (version 2.1), and Review of
EPA's draft IRIS Toxicological Review of Hexavalent Chromium. The SAB
quality review process ensures that draft reports developed by SAB
panels, committees, or workgroups are reviewed by the Chartered SAB
before being finalized and transmitted to the EPA Administrator. (3)
The SAB will discuss a draft commentary developed by an SAB workgroup
on Volume Requirements for 2023 and Beyond under the Renewable Fuel
Standard Program (RIN 2060-AV14). (4) The SAB will discuss
recommendations received from the SAB Workgroup for Review of Science
Supporting EPA Decisions concerning SAB review of EPA planned
regulatory actions. Under the SAB's authorizing statute, the SAB ``may
make available to the Administrator, within the time specified by the
Administrator, its advice and comments on the adequacy of the
scientific and technical basis'' of proposed rules. The SAB Workgroup
for Review of Science Supporting EPA Decisions (SAB SSD Workgroup) is
charged with identifying EPA planned actions that may warrant SAB
review.
    Availability of meeting materials: All meeting materials, including
the agenda, will be available on the SAB web page at https://sab.epa.gov.
    Procedures for providing public input: Public comment for
consideration by EPA's Federal advisory committees and panels has a
different purpose from public comment provided to EPA program offices.
Therefore, the process for submitting comments to a Federal advisory
committee is different from the process used to submit comments to an
EPA program office. Federal advisory committees and panels, including
scientific advisory committees, provide independent advice to the EPA.
Members of the public can submit relevant comments pertaining to the
committee's charge or meeting materials. Input from the public to the

SAB will have the most impact if it provides specific scientific or
technical information or analysis for the SAB to consider or if it
relates to the clarity or accuracy of the technical information.
Members of the public wishing to provide comments should follow the
instruction below to submit comments.
    Oral statements: In general, individuals or groups requesting an
oral presentation will be limited to three minutes. Each person making
an oral statement should consider providing written comments as well as
their oral statement so that the points presented orally can be
expanded upon in writing. Persons interested in providing oral
statements should contact the DFO, in writing (preferably via email) at
the contact information noted under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, by
September 14, 2023, to be placed on the list of registered speakers.
    Written statements: Written statements will be accepted throughout
the advisory process; however, for timely consideration by SAB members,
statements should be submitted to the DFO by September 14, 2023, for
consideration at the September 21-22, 2023, meeting. Written statements
should be supplied to the DFO at the contact information above via
email. Submitters are requested to provide an unsigned version of each
document because the SAB Staff Office does not publish documents with
signatures on its websites. Members of the public should be aware that
their personal contact information if included in any written comments,
may be posted to the SAB website. Copyrighted material will not be
posted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.
    Accessibility: For information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities, please contact the DFO, at the contact
information noted above, preferably at least ten days before the
meeting, to give the EPA as much time as possible to process your
request.

V Khanna Johnston,
Deputy Director, Science Advisory Board Staff Office.
[FR Doc. 2023-17384 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: April 2, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 64)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 17893-17896]
[DOCID:fr02ap08-7]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2008-0103; FRL-8549-8]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision to
exempt initial fueling of motor vehicles at automobile assembly plants
in the St. Louis metropolitan area from the Missouri Performance
Evaluation Test Procedures (MO/PETP) approval test requirements. MO/
PETP requirements were initially implemented to maintain the integrity
of local air quality by regulating gasoline fueling emissions. The
Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provided an air quality
analysis and it was determined that removal of these test requirements
for initial fueling at automobile assembly plants will not adversely
affect air quality in the St. Louis area. In addition, certain portions
of the rule were renumbered and reformatted. This revision will ensure
consistency between the state and the federally-approved rules.

DATES: This direct final rule will be effective June 2, 2008, without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by May 2, 2008. If
adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that
the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2008-0103, by one of the following methods:
    1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail: Amy Algoe-Eakin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101.
    4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to Amy Algoe-
Eakin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development
Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-
2008-0103. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or e-
mail information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on

the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street,
Kansas City, Kansas 66101. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding
Federal holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine these
documents should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours
in advance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Algoe-Eakin at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
by e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This section provides
additional information by addressing the following questions:

What is a SIP?
What is the Federal approval process for a SIP?
What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me?
What is being addressed in this document?
Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
What action is EPA taking?

What is a SIP?

    Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop
air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state
air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards
established by EPA. These ambient standards are established under
section 109 of the CAA, and they currently address six criteria
pollutants. These pollutants are: carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide,
ozone, lead, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide.
    Each state must submit these regulations and control strategies to
us for approval and incorporation into the federally-enforceable SIP.
    Each federally-approved SIP protects air quality primarily by
addressing air pollution at its point of origin. These SIPs can be
extensive, containing state regulations or other enforceable documents
and supporting information such as emission inventories, monitoring
networks, and modeling demonstrations.

What is the Federal approval process for a SIP?

    In order for state regulations to be incorporated into the
federally-enforceable SIP, states must formally adopt the regulations
and control strategies consistent with state and Federal requirements.
This process generally includes a public notice, public hearing, public
comment period, and a formal adoption by a state-authorized rulemaking
body.
    Once a state rule, regulation, or control strategy is adopted, the
state submits it to us for inclusion into the SIP. We must provide
public notice and seek additional public comment regarding the proposed
Federal action on the state submission. If adverse comments are
received, they must be addressed prior to any final Federal action by
us.
    All state regulations and supporting information approved by EPA
under section 110 of the CAA are incorporated into the federally-
approved SIP. Records of such SIP actions are maintained in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) at title 40, part 52, entitled ``Approval and
Promulgation of Implementation Plans.'' The actual state regulations
which are approved are not reproduced in their entirety in the CFR
outright but are ``incorporated by reference,'' which means that we
have approved a given state regulation with a specific effective date.

What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me?

    Enforcement of the state regulation before and after it is
incorporated into the federally-approved SIP is primarily a state
responsibility. However, after the regulation is Federally approved, we
are authorized to take enforcement action against violators. Citizens
are also offered legal recourse to address violations as described in
section 304 of the CAA.

What is being addressed in this document?

    On October 1, 2007, EPA received a request from the MDNR to approve
a revision to the SIP to exempt initial fueling of motor vehicles at
automobile assembly plants in the St. Louis metropolitan area from the
Missouri Performance Evaluation Test Procedures (MO/PETP) approval test
requirements. The MO/PETP requirements were initially implemented to
maintain the integrity of local air quality by regulating gasoline
fueling emissions (volatile organic compounds--VOCs) in St. Louis.
    The MO/PETP is a bank of individual test procedures that apply to
manufacturers of vapor recovery components. The MDNR uses these test
procedures to evaluate the overall efficiency of various types of
gasoline vapor recovery systems (including Stage I and Stage II
systems). Stage I vapor recovery is the capture and control of gasoline
vapors that would normally be released into the atmosphere during the
storage of gasoline at a terminal or bulk plant, or during the loading
of a gasoline delivery vessel and the subsequent delivery and unloading
of a gasoline delivery into another storage tank, usually at a gasoline
dispensing facility (GDF). Stage II is the capture and control of
gasoline vapors that would normally be released in the atmosphere
during the refueling of motor vehicles at the GDF. Stage II involves
the installation of a black boot on the gasoline nozzle at gas stations
in the St. Louis area which captures the vapors from the automobile
tank and returns these vapors to the underground storage tank at the
GDF.
    In implementing the tests, the automobile industry determined that
the testing requirements were costly and burdensome with little or no
emissions benefits. Representatives of the automobile manufacturing
industry in the St. Louis area met with MDNR representatives with
regard to the MO/PETP test requirements and provided MDNR with
information that indicated that emissions were already controlled
pursuant to the CAA and pertinent Missouri rules. In addition, the air
quality benefit of MO/PETP testing for initial fueling at the
automobile assembly plants was nominal. These issues, coupled with the
extensive costs, initiated the change to 10 CSR 10-5.220.
    The St. Louis metropolitan area is currently designated
nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone standard. The EPA Region 7 requested
that MDNR demonstrate that revisions to this rule would not negatively
impact air quality. The CAA Section 110(l), provides in part, that SIP
revisions cannot interfere with attainment of a National Ambient Air
Quality Standard or with reasonable further progress towards
attainment. CAA Section 193 contains anti-backsliding provisions as
well, but it does not apply here because the testing requirements at
issue do not predate the 1990 amendments to the CAA. To address these
concerns, MDNR submitted an air emission impact worksheet that
concluded the emissions not captured at the automobile assembly plants'
initial fueling operations were negligible compared to the total VOCs
in the St. Louis nonattainment areas. Based on this analysis, EPA
concluded that this change would not relax SIP requirements so as to
adversely impact air emissions.
    It should be noted that the only portion of the MO/PETP rule
affected by the revision is the portion that applies at automobile
manufacturing plants. The remaining requirements for Stage I

and Stage II vapor recovery remain in place. MDNR rules include the
requirement to obtain construction permits before replacement or
addition of equipment that may affect vapor tightness of the vapor
recovery system. Operating permits for these facilities are required in
accordance with 10 CSR 10-6.065 and Title V of the CAA. In addition,
certain portions of the rule were renumbered and reformatted. The
renumbering and reformatting of the rule makes this rule consistent
with the general format of Missouri air rules and does not change any
requirements.

Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?

    The submittal satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. In addition, the state submittal has met the public
notice requirements for SIP submission in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102
and met the substantive SIP requirements of the CAA including section
110.

What action is EPA taking?

    We are approving the request to amend the Missouri SIP (10 CSR 10-
5.220) to exempt the MO/PETP approval test requirements for initial
fueling of motor vehicles at automobile assembly plants in St. Louis.
This rule was also renumbered and reformatted. The appropriate air
quality analysis was included with the SIP submittal and it has been
determined that these changes will not relax the SIP or adversely
impact air emissions.
    We are processing this action as a direct final action because the
revisions make routine changes to the existing rules which are
noncontroversial and make regulatory revisions, required by state
statute. Therefore, we do not anticipate any adverse comments. Please
note that if EPA receives adverse comment on a part of this rule and if
that part can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those parts of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse
comment.

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA.
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997) because it approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to
disapprove a state submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA when it reviews a state
submission, to use VCS in place of a state submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 2, 2008. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: March 20, 2008.
William Rice,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.

0
Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart AA--Missouri

0
2. In Sec.  52.1320(c) the table is amended under Chapter 5 by revising
the entry for ``10-5.220'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1320  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                                            EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                           State
          Missouri citation                        Title              effective date        EPA approval date                    Explanation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Missouri Department of Natural Resources
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      * * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       Chapter 5--Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      * * * * * * *
10-5.220............................  Control of Petroleum Liquid            9/30/07  4/02/08 [insert FR page
                                       Storage, Loading and Transfer.                  number where the document
                                                                                begins].

                                                                      * * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-6666 Filed 4-1-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 227 (Monday, November 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70396-70398]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28205]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2010-0166]

Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Renewal of
Exemption for Con-Way Freight, TK Holdings, Inc., and Bendix

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of exemption; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) renews
an exemption which enables motor carriers to mount lane departure
warning system sensors lower in the windshield of a commercial motor
vehicle (CMV) than is currently permitted by the Agency's regulations.
The Agency has concluded that granting this renewed exemption will
maintain a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level of safety achieved without the exemption. However, the Agency
requests comments on this issue, especially from anyone who believes
this standard will not be maintained.

DATES: This decision is effective November 18, 2013. Comments must be
received on or before December 26, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments bearing the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) number FMCSA-by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Ground Floor, Room W12-140, DOT Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and
docket number for this notice. For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information on the exemption process, see the
``Public Participation'' heading below. Note that all comments received
will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided. Please see the ``Privacy Act''
heading for further information.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov or to Room W12-140,
DOT Building, New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) is available 24 hours each day, 365
days each year. If you want acknowledgement that we received your
comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope or postcard
or print the acknowledgement page that appears after submitting
comments on-line.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement for the FDMS published in the Federal
Register published on December 29, 2010 (73 FR 82132) or you may visit
http://edocket/access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-785.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Luke W. Loy, Vehicle and Roadside
Operations Division, Office of Bus and Truck Standards and Operations,
MC-PSV,<PHONE_NUMBER>, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e), FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the prohibition on obstructions to the driver's field of view
requirements in 49 CFR 393.60(e) for a two-year period if it finds
``such exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is
equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety that would be
achieved absent such exemption'' (49 CFR 381.305(a)).

Applications for Exemptions

    On November 11, 2009, Con-way applied for an exemption from 49 CFR
393.60(e)(1) to allow it to install lane departure warning system
sensors on 1,272 of its newly purchased power units. Takata and Iteris
submitted nearly identical exemption applications for their lane
departure warning system sensors on December 15, 2009 and on February
25, 2010, respectively. On June 14, 2010, FMCSA published a notice of
these applications, and asked for public comment (75 FR 33666).
    Section 393.60(e)(1) of the FMCSRs prohibits the obstruction of the
driver's field of view by devices mounted at the top of the windshield.
Antennas, transponders and similar devices (collectively, devices) must
not be mounted more than 152 mm (6 inches) below the upper edge of the
windshield. These devices must be located outside the area swept by the
windshield wipers and outside the driver's sight lines to the road and
highway signs and signals.
    Con-way, Takata, and Iteris stated that over the last several
years, truck manufacturers have increased the windshield area to
maximize driver visibility. As a result, manufacturers

have installed larger windshield wipers that increase the swept area
beyond the minimum required by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 104, ``Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems.'' FMVSS No.
104 establishes minimum windshield wiper standards to be used by
manufacturers of passenger cars, multi-purpose passenger vehicles,
trucks, and buses.
    Con-way, Takata, and Iteris provided diagrams and photos showing
the dimensions of their lane departure sensors and their mounting
locations on vehicle windshields. Specifically, the lane departure
sensor device itself measures 2 inches by 3.5 inches and is mounted
within the top 2 inches of the windshield wiper sweep. The lane
departure system requires the forward lens of the sensor to be in the
swept area of the windshield for a clear view during inclement weather.
    Con-way, Takata, and Iteris cited the findings of a report
published by FMCSA's Office of Analysis, Research and Technology titled
``Benefit-Cost Analyses of Onboard Safety Systems,'' which summarizes
the projected safety benefits for various CMV onboard safety
technologies, including lane departure warning systems. Using projected
efficacy rates ranging from 23 percent to 53 percent, the report
estimated that, based on industry-wide use, lane departure warning
systems have the potential to eliminate approximately 1,609-2,463
single-vehicle roadway departure crashes, 627-1,307 single-vehicle
roadway departure rollovers, 1,111-2,223 same-direction lane departure
sideswipes, 997-1,992 opposite-direction lane departure sideswipes, and
59-118 opposite-direction lane departure head-on collisions. Con-way,
Takata, and Iteris each stated that without the exemption, they would
be unable to (1) implement the lane departure warning system, and (2)
realize the potential safety benefits that could be expected with the
utilization of this technology, as estimated in the FMCSA report
described above.

2011 Notice of Final Disposition

    On November 18, 2011 (76 FR 71619), FMCSA published a notice of
final disposition granting the Con-way, Takata, and Iteris exemption
applications. FMCSA determined that granting the temporary exemptions
to allow the placement of lane departure warning system sensors lower
in the windshield than is currently permitted by the Agency's
regulations would provide a level of safety that is equivalent to, or
greater than the level of safety achieved without the exemption because
(1) based on the technical information available, there was no
indication that the lane departure warning system sensors would
obstruct drivers' views of the roadway, highway signs and surrounding
traffic; (2) generally, trucks and buses have an elevated seating
position that greatly improves the forward visual field of the driver,
and any impairment of available sight lines would be minimal; and (3)
the location within the top two inches of the area swept by the
windshield wiper and out of the driver's normal sightline would be
reasonable and enforceable at roadside. In addition, the Agency
believed that the use of lane departure warning systems by fleets would
be likely to improve the overall level of safety to the motoring
public.

Bendix's Request for the Renewal of the Exemption

    In 2011, Iteris, Inc. completed the sale of its vehicle sensors
business to Bendix, which is continuing to sell the Iteris-developed
lane departure warning systems. Bendix is seeking renewal of the 2011
exemption.

FMCSA Decision

    The Agency believes that granting the exemption renewal to continue
allowing the placement of lane departure warning system sensors lower
in the windshield than is currently permitted by the Agency's
regulations will provide a level of safety that is equivalent to, or
greater than the level of safety achieved without the exemption because
(1) based on the technical information available, there is no
indication that the lane departure warning system sensors would
obstruct drivers' views of the roadway, highway signs and surrounding
traffic; (2) generally, trucks and buses have an elevated seating
position that greatly improves the forward visual field of the driver,
and any impairment of available sight lines would be minimal; and (3)
the location within the top two inches of the area swept by the
windshield wiper and out of the driver's normal sightline will be
reasonable and enforceable at roadside. The Agency is unaware of any
incidents wherein a crash involving vehicles equipped with these lane
departure warning systems could be attributed to the minimal visual
intrusion of the devices into the drivers' field of vision. In
addition, the Agency believes that the use of lane departure warning
systems by fleets is likely to improve the overall level of safety to
the motoring public.
    While the November 2011 exemption granted relief to motor carriers
using only the Takata and Iteris lane departure warning systems, the
Agency has determined--given it is unaware of any reduction in the
level of safety associated with the use of those systems--that it is
appropriate to extend the scope of this exemption at this time to
encompass motor carriers using any lane departure warning system,
provided that the sensor that is mounted in the vehicle windshield (1)
is the same size (2 inches by 3.5 inches) or smaller than the Takata
and Bendix sensors, and (2) mounted in the windshield in accordance
with the provisions of the original exemption, and as restated below.
If, however, a motor carrier wishes to utilize a lane departure warning
system using sensors larger than those identified above, a new
exemption application will need to be submitted to FMCSA in accordance
with the requirements of 49 CFR 381.300.

Terms and Conditions for the Exemption

    The Agency hereby grants the exemptions for a two-year period,
beginning November 25, 2013 and ending November 25, 2015. During the
temporary exemption period, motor carriers using lane departure warning
systems with sensors measuring 2 inches by 3.5 inches or smaller must
ensure that the sensors are mounted not more than 50 mm (2 inches)
below the upper edge of the area swept by the windshield wipers, and
outside the driver's sight lines to the road and highway signs and
signals. The exemption will be valid for two years unless rescinded
earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will be rescinded if: (1) Motor
carriers and/or commercial motor vehicles fail to comply with the terms
and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a
lower level of safety than was maintained before it was granted; or (3)
continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals
and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315(b).
    Interested parties possessing information that would demonstrate
that CMVs operated by motor carriers using lane departure warning
systems are not achieving the requisite statutory level of safety
should immediately notify FMCSA. The Agency will evaluate any such
information and, if safety is being compromised or if the continuation
of the exemption is not consistent with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315(b), will take immediate steps to revoke the exemption.

Preemption

    During the period the exemption is in effect, no State shall
enforce any law or

regulation that conflicts with or is inconsistent with this exemption
with respect to a person operating under the exemption.

    Issued on: November 18, 2013.
William Bronrott,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-28205 Filed 11-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on January 31, 2005

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2004-19966

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Application of BRENDAN AIRWAYS, LLC d/b/a USA 3000 AIRLINES (USA 3000)
filed 12/22/04 for:

XX  Exemption for two years under 49 U.S.C. 40109 to provide the
following service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail
between (1) the terminal point Chicago, Illinois, and the terminal point
Zihuatanejo, Mexico, (2) the terminal point Detroit, Michigan, and the
terminal point Cozumel, Mexico, and (3) the terminal point Detroit,
Michigan, and the terminal point Puerto Vallarta, Mexico.   USA 3000
intends to begin service on these routes on or about January 27, 2005.
USA 3000 proposes to serve the Chicago-Zihuatanejo/Ixtapa and
Detroit-Cozumel markets on a seasonal basis.

Applicant rep:   Pierre Murphy<PHONE_NUMBER>     DOT Analyst:  Thuy H.
Cooper<PHONE_NUMBER>

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX  Granted (subject to conditions, see below)

XX  Granted sua sponte

The above action was effective when taken: January 31, 2005, through
January 31, 2007.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

XX   The authority granted is consistent with the aviation agreement
between the United States and Mexico.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

XX  Holder’s certificate of public convenience and necessity

		XX  Standard Exemption Conditions (attached)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------

Responsive Pleadings:  On January 6, 2005, United Air Lines, Inc.
(United) filed an answer in partial objection to USA 3000’s
application.  United states that it has no objection to USA 3000’s
application for Detroit-Puerto Vallarta and Detroit-Cozumel authority.
United states, however, that it does object to USA 3000’s application
to the extent that it is requesting two-year exemption authority to
serve the Chicago-Zihuatanejo market.  In this regard, United maintains
that it has recently begun service to Zihuatanejo from Los Angeles and
Denver and that, after the end of the winter 2004-2005 season, it will
have completed its analysis of that service, along with an assessment of
the feasibility of introducing additional service to Zihuatanejo from
Chicago.  United states that, under these circumstances, the Department
should grant to USA 3000 a temporary exemption to permit USA 3000 to
operate the Chicago-Zihuatanejo service during the Winter 2005 season,
and invite applications for longer-term authority after the winter
season has concluded.

On January 12, 2005, USA 3000 filed a reply to United’s answer.  USA
3000 argues that United’s proposal to award to USA 3000 temporary
authority for a few months and then institute a carrier-selection
proceeding if United ultimately decides it might want to serve the
Chicago-Zihuatanejo market is without precedent and would be patently
unfair and commercially unworkable.  USA 3000 maintains that, unlike
United, USA 3000 clearly has made the decision to operate
Chicago-Zihuatanejo service, and no other U.S. carrier has filed an
application for such service.  USA 3000 states that, in these
circumstances, USA 3000’s application should be promptly granted
without regard to United’s “contingent future plans,” and that
United’s answer should be dismissed.

On January 14, 2005, United filed a response to USA 3000’s reply.
United states that, on January 6, 2005, USA 3000 announced its
introduction of three-weekly charter flights in the Chicago-Zihuatanejo
market, beginning January 17, 2005.  United argues that this is the same
service pattern which USA 3000 proposes in the captioned application.
United states that, given USA 3000’s willingness and ability to
introduce Chicago-Zihuatenejo seasonal charter service without the
exemption authority it has requested here, USA 3000 “can hardly claim
that the grant of the limited relief sought by United would prevent it
from proceeding with its plans for the Winter 2005 season.”  United
further argues that, while an immediate grant of long-term authority to
USA 3000 might serve USA 3000’s interest, by precluding United as a
potential competitor, it would also deprive the public of the
opportunity to secure superior service benefits for the subject market.

Decision:  We have decided to grant the uncontested requests of USA 3000
for two-year exemption authority to serve the Detroit-Puerto Vallarta
and Detroit-Cozumel markets.  We have also decided to grant the request
of USA 3000 for two-year exemption authority to serve the
Chicago-Zihuatanejo market.

Under the U.S.-Mexico aviation agreement, only two U.S. carriers may be
designated to serve a given city-pair market.    Currently, ATA
Airlines, Inc. (ATA) holds authority and is designated to provide
direct-carrier service on the Chicago-Zihuatanejo route.  Thus, there is
only one designation opportunity available for Chicago-Zihuatanejo
service.

Only one U.S. carrier, USA 3000, has filed an application for
Chicago-Zihuatanejo services with firm plans to initiate service in the
near future.  Neither United nor any other carrier has filed a competing
request for this authority.  The Chicago-Zihuatanejo route rights
involved here constitute a valuable resource obtained in exchange for
granting Mexico route opportunities for its airlines to serve the United
States, and the public interest calls for use of these rights.  In light
of the fact that USA 3000 has presented an application to use these
valuable limited-route rights, along with a firm service proposal, and
no other U.S. carrier has filed a competing request, we find that grant
of the application for the full term requested (which is in fact the
standard duration of the exemption awards we issue to U.S. carriers for
service to Mexico) is in the public interest.  United has not provided
any evidence to persuade us to take a different approach here.

Conditions:  The U.S.-Mexico exemption authority granted is subject to
the dormancy notice requirements set forth in condition 7 of Appendix A
of Order 88-10-2.
________________________________________________________________________
_______________

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department’s regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the application was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted, we denied all requests in the referenced
Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority granted in this
Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at: http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.aspU.S. Carrier
Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the U.S. carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, including, but not limited to, 49 CFR Part 1544.
To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, the holder shall, before commencing any new service
(including charter flights) to or from a foreign airport, contact its
International Principal Security Inspector (IPSI) to advise the IPSI of
its plans and to find out whether the Transportation Security
Administration has determined that security is adequate to allow such
airport(s) to be served; and

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

05/2004

   Although the applicant did not specifically request authority for
Zihuatnejo to include Ixtapa, we have consistently granted
Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo as a joint point in our U.S.-Mexico authorizations.
Thus, we will grant, sua sponte, the Ixtapa authority here as well.

   United further states that, by that time, the results of the current
U.S.-Mexico aviation negotiations will be known and it may be possible
for both USA 3000 and United to offer Chicago-Zihuatanejo services.

   USA 3000 accompanied its reply with a motion for leave to file an
otherwise unauthorized document.  We grant that motion.

   United accompanied its response with a motion for leave to file an
otherw獩湵畡桴牯穩摥搠捯浵湥⹴†敗朠慲瑮琠慨⁴潭
楴湯മ

h


[Federal Register: May 19, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 97)]
[Notices]
[Page 28815-28816]
[DOCID:fr19my08-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2582-027]

Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation; Notice of Application
Accepted for Filing, Soliciting Motions To Intervene and Protests,
Ready for Environmental Analysis, and Soliciting Comments,
Recommendations, Terms and Conditions, and Fishway Prescriptions

May 12, 2008.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Amendment of License.
    b. Project No.: 2582-027.
    c. Date Filed: April 3, 2008.
    d. Applicant: Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation.
    e. Name of Project: Station No. 2.
    f. Location: The project is located on the Genesee River in the
City of Rochester, Monroe County, New York.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contacts: Cindy D. Witt, Hydro License Coordinator,
Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation, 89 East Avenue, Rochester, New
York 14649. Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER> and Elizabeth W. Whittle, Nixon
Peabody, LLC, 401 Ninth Street, Suite 900, Washington, DC 20004. Tel:
(202) 585-8338.
    i. FERC Contact: Mr. Vedula Sarma, Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, and e-
mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, protests, motions to intervene,
recommendations, preliminary terms and conditions, and fishway
prescriptions is due 60 days from the issuance date of this notice;
reply comments are due 105 days from the issuance date of this notice.
All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Please include the project
number (P-2582-027) on any comments or motions filed.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person in the official service list for the
project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Request: The licensee proposes to upgrade the
existing 6.5 MW unit to 8.5 MW, and install a new 6.3 MW unit in a new
powerhouse adjacent to the existing powerhouse. The hydraulic capacity
of the project would increase from 1,250 cfs to 2,400 cfs. The project
will continue to operate as run-of-river with no change to impoundment
elevation. Proposed modifications include: (a) Increasing the height of
the needle dam, (b) deepening of intake structure forebay and
trashracks, (c) new penstock with low-level bifurcation, (d)
modification to fish bypass, and (e) new electric substation.
    l. Locations of Applications: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission in the
Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A,
Washington, DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may
also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov
using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last
three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item h
above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene--Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    Comments, protests, interventions, recommendations, terms and
conditions, and fishway prescriptions may be filed electronically via
the Internet in lieu of paper; See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link.
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing.

    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: All filings must (1)
bear in all capital letters the title ``PROTEST,'' ``MOTION TO
INTERVENE,'' ``COMMENTS,'' ``REPLY COMMENTS,'' ``RECOMMENDATIONS,'' ``
TERMS AND CONDITIONS,'' or `` FISHWAY PRESCRIPTIONS;'' (2) set forth in
the heading the name of the applicant and the project number of the
application to which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name,
address, and telephone number of the person protesting or intervening;
and (4) otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001
through 385.2005. All comments, recommendations, terms and conditions
or prescriptions must set forth their evidentiary basis and otherwise
comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). All comments,
recommendations, terms and conditions or prescriptions should relate to
project works, which are the subject of the license amendment. Agencies
may obtain copies of the application directly from the applicant. A
copy of all other filings in reference to this application must be
accompanied by proof of service on all persons listed in the service
list prepared by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with
18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.
    p. As provided for in 18 CFR 4.34(b)(5)(i), a license applicant
must file, no later than 60 days following the date of issuance of this
notice of acceptance and ready for environmental analysis: (1) A copy
of the water quality certification; (2) a copy of the request for
certification, including proof of the date on which the certifying
agency received the request; or (3) evidence of waiver of water quality
certification.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-11092 Filed 5-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Panel Members for the Meeting of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory Panel (FIFRA SAP) to
           Consider and Review Scientific Issues Associated with the
 Proposed Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP)Tier 2 Ecotoxicity Tests

                               June 25-28, 2013

              EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0182			OPP Docket Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER>

FIFRA SAP Chair

Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D.
Professor of Aquatic Ecotoxicology & Environmental Toxicology
Department of Environmental Sciences
University of California, Riverside
Riverside, CA

FIFRA SAP Session Chair

Martha S. Sandy, Ph.D., M.P.H.
Supervisory Toxicologist and Chief
Reproductive & Cancer Hazard Assessment Branch
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
California Environmental Protection Agency
Oakland, CA

Designated Federal Official

Sharlene R. Matten, Ph.D.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Science Coordination & Policy
FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel
EPA East Building, MC 7201M
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>
E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

 FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Members

 K. Barry Delclos, Ph.D.
 Research Pharmacologist
 Division of Biochemical Toxicology
 National Center for Toxicological Research
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Jefferson, AR

 Marion F. Ehrich, Ph.D., D.A.B.T., A.T.S.
 Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
 Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology
 Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine
 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
 Blacksburg, VA

 Stephen J. Klaine, Ph.D.
 Professor and Director
 Clemson University Institute of Environmental Toxicology
 Department of Biological Sciences
 Pendleton, SC

 James L. McManaman, Ph.D.
 Professor and Chief
 Section of Basic Reproductive Sciences
 Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology & Physiology and Biophysics
 University of Colorado-Denver
 Aurora, CO

FQPA Science Review Board Members

George Bentley, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Integrative Biology
University of California - Berkeley
Berkeley, CA

Vicki Blazer, Ph.D.
Research Fish Biologist
Fish Health Branch, Leetown Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
Kearneysville, WV

Mary C. Christman, Ph.D.
MCC Statistical Consulting, LLC
Gainesville, FL

Robert Denver, Ph.D.
Professor
Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI

Jennifer Freeman, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
School of Health Sciences
Purdue University
West Lafayette, IN

Dallas E. Johnson, Ph.D.
Professor Emeritus
Department of Statistics
Kansas State University
Manhattan, KS

Seth Kullman, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology
North Carolina State University
Raleigh, NC

John P. McCarty, Ph.D.
Professor of Biology
Director of Environmental Studies
Department of Biology
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Omaha, NE

Reynaldo Patiño, Ph.D.
Unit Leader and Professor
Texas Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit
U.S. Geological Survey
Texas Tech University
Lubbock, TX

Edward J. Perkins, Ph.D.
Senior Research Scientist
Environmental Networks and Genetic Toxicology
Environmental Laboratory
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center
U.S. Army Corps Engineers
Vicksburg, MS

Catherine R. Propper, Ph.D.
Professor
Department of Biological Sciences
Northern Arizona University
Flagstaff, AZ

Colin G. Scanes, Ph.D., Sc.D.
Department of Animal Science
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Milwaukee, WI

Kenneth M. Portier, Ph.D.
Program Director, Statistics
American Cancer Society
National Home Office
Atlanta, GA

Geoffrey I. Scott, Ph.D.
Director
Center for Coastal Environmental Health
and Biomolecular Research
National Ocean Services
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Charleston, SC

Shea Tuberty, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Invertebrate Physiology
Appalachian State University
Boone, NC


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 24, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17153-17154]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08237]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC19-79-000.
    Applicants: Cobalt Power, L.L.C., Garrison Energy Center LLC,
RockGen Energy LLC.
    Description: Joint Application for Authorization Under Section 203
of the Federal Power Act, et al. of Cobalt Power, L.L.C.
    Filed Date: 4/18/19.
    Accession Number: 20190418-5158.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/19.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1267-006.
    Applicants: GridLiance High Plains LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Supplemental Revisions to OATT
Attchmt K and Resubmission of Attchmt Q to be effective 3/31/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/18/19.
    Accession Number: 20190418-5146.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1743-003.
    Applicants: Doswell Limited Partnership.
    Description: Report Filing: Refund Report? Informational Filing to
be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 4/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190417-5155.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1600-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: E&P Agreement for VP
Development--es Volta to be effective 4/18/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190417-5143.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1601-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of WMPA/SA
No. 3656; Queue No. V4-022 to be effective 5/13/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190417-5146.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1602-000.
    Applicants: Mirabito Power & Gas, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: MBR baseline refile to be effective
3/31/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190417-5151.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1603-000.
    Applicants: Lorenzo Wind, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Lorenzo Wind,
LLC Triennial Amendment to Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 4/
18/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190417-5156.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1604-000.
    Applicants: Minco Wind IV, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Minco Wind IV,
LLC Triennial Amendment to Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 4/
18/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190417-5157.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1605-000.
    Applicants: Minco Wind V, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Minco Wind V,
LLC Triennial Amendment to Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 4/
18/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190417-5158.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1606-000.
    Applicants: Ninnescah Wind Energy, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Ninnescah Wind
Energy, LLC Triennial Amendment to Market-Based Rate Tariff to be
effective 4/18/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190417-5162.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1607-000.
    Applicants: Osborn Wind Energy, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Osborn Wind
Energy, LLC Triennial Amendment Market-Based Rate Tariff to be
effective 4/18/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190417-5163.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1608-000.
    Applicants: Pratt Wind, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Pratt Wind, LLC
Triennial Amendment to Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 4/18/
2019.
    Filed Date: 4/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190417-5164.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1609-000.
    Applicants: Rush Springs Wind Energy, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Rush Springs
Wind Energy, LLC Triennial Amendment to Market-Based Rate Tariff to be
effective 4/18/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/17/19.
    Accession Number: 20190417-5165.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1610-000.
    Applicants: Louisville Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: OMU Amended NITSA Svc Agmt
No 15 to be effective 3/20/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/18/19.
    Accession Number: 20190418-5002.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1611-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of WMPA/SA
No. 4361; Queue No. AA1-096 to be effective 4/8/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/18/19.
    Accession Number: 20190418-5095.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1612-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-04-18 EIM Agreement
between CAISO and Seattle City Light Dept. to be effective 6/18/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/18/19.
    Accession Number: 20190418-5106.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1613-000.
    Applicants: Southwestern Public Service Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Hale Wind Project to be
effective 6/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/18/19.
    Accession Number: 20190418-5116.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1614-000.
    Applicants: Minco IV & V Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Minco IV & V
Interconnection, LLC Triennial Amendment to MBR Tariff to be effective
4/19/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/18/19.
    Accession Number: 20190418-5118.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1615-000.
    Applicants: Palo Duro Wind Interconnection Services, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Palo Duro Wind

Interconnection Services, LLC Triennial Amendment to MBR Tariff to be
effective 4/19/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/18/19.
    Accession Number: 20190418-5119.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1616-000.
    Applicants: Seiling Wind Interconnection Services, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Seiling Wind
Interconnection Services, LLC Triennial Amendment to MBR Tariff to be
effective 4/19/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/18/19.
    Accession Number: 20190418-5120.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1617-000.
    Applicants: Sholes Wind, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Sholes Wind, LLC
Triennial Amendment to Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 4/19/
2019.
    Filed Date: 4/18/19.
    Accession Number: 20190418-5121.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1618-000.
    Applicants: Steele Flats Wind Project, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Steele Flats
Wind Project, LLC Triennial Amendment to Market-Based Rate Tariff to be
effective 4/19/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/18/19.
    Accession Number: 20190418-5122.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1619-000.
    Applicants: Wildcat Ranch Wind Project, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Wildcat Ranch
Wind Project, LLC Triennial Amendment to Market-Based Rate Tariff to be
effective 4/19/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/18/19.
    Accession Number: 20190418-5123.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1620-000.
    Applicants: AEP Texas Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: AEPTX-Shakes Solar
Interconnection Agreement Second Amend & Restated to be effective 4/4/
2019.
    Filed Date: 4/18/19.
    Accession Number: 20190418-5153.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/19.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 18, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-08237 Filed 4-23-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P